alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Sara Coury Eagan, an Attorney.

[55 NYS3d. 677]—

*949Per Curiam.

Sara Coury Eagan was admitted to practice by this Court in 2009 and lists a business address in New Orleans, Louisiana with the Office of Court Administration. By affidavit sworn to May 17, 2017 and filed May 22, 2017, Eagan now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons *(see*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) advises that it does not oppose Eagan’s application by correspondence dated June 19, 2017.

Upon reading the affidavit of Eagan, and upon reading the correspondence in response by the Chief Attorney for AGC, and having determined that Eagan is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant her application and accept her resignation.

Garry, J.P., Lynch, Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that Sara Coury Eagan’s application for permission to resign is granted and her nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further ordered that Sara Coury Eagan’s name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court *(see generally*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]); and it is further ordered that, effective immediately, Sara Coury Eagan is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Eagan is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further ordered that Sara Coury Eagan shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to her.
Order entered February 1, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00576-CV

SNP SCHNEIDER-NEUREITHER & PARTNER AG, Appellant

V.

SAMUEL WOOD AND JAMES D. SPIELMAN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14118

ORDER

The Court has determined that oral argument would be appropriate in this case. 

Appellant notified this Court by letter dated January 29, 2019, that its counsel is not available to 

present argument on February 13, 2019, and Appellant has advised in its January 11, 2019 

Unopposed Motion to Reschedule Oral Argument that counsel for all parties are available on 

Wednesday March 6, 2019. Accordingly, we ORDER the parties to appear and present oral 

argument on Wednesday March 6, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. in the Merrill Hartman Courtroom, 

located on the 8th floor of the George Allen Courthouse. 

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
No. 10-5877.

#### Ernest Jones, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 940, 131 S. Ct. 354,

178 L. Ed. 2d 229,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7594.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 205.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-50515

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

David Olmos, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:21-CR-146-1

______________________________

Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Olmos has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Olmos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 2, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50515 Document: 00516633352 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/02/2023
No. 22-50515

2

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-50515 Document: 00516633352 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/02/2023
Letter dated July 29, 2004 from Matthew J. Espe to William S. Urkiel



 Exhibit 10.41 
  
 July 29, 2004 
  
 William S. Urkiel 
 3 Dovecote Lane 
 Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355 
  
  
 Dear Bill: 
  
 This is to confirm our recent discussions regarding your decision to retire from employment with IKON Office Solutions, Inc. 
  
 You have informed me that you intend to retire from IKON by no later than June 30, 2005. IKON will, therefore, begin conducting an executive search to find a new Chief
Financial Officer. While it is understood that the exact date of your retirement is yet to be determined, I have requested that you remain with IKON until such time as a new CFO has been hired and successfully transitioned into the CFO role. Once a
new CFO is hired, we currently anticipate that the transition period should take approximately six weeks to complete. 
  
 Based on our discussions, you have agreed to remain with IKON through this transition period. After the transition period is concluded, we have agreed that you either
will remain at the company in a senior capacity reporting to me through June 30, 2005, or you may decide to leave prior to that time. 
  
 In exchange for your commitment to remain with IKON through the CFO transition period, in the event you decide to leave IKON following the transition period but before
June 30, 2005, IKON will continue to pay your base salary and your pro rated annual bonus through June 30, 2005, upon signing a standard IKON release. 
  
 Bill, on behalf of the Board and the management, I want to thank you for all of your contributions to the company over the past several years and your willingness to
support us in the implementation of your succession plan. 
  
  
 Sincerely, 
  
 /s/    MATTHEW J. ESPE 
  
 Matthew J. Espe 
 Chairman and CEO
# C_2016326EN.01002101.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 July 2016 — Oikonomopoulos v Commission

(Case T-483/13) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Damage caused by the Commission in the context of an OLAF investigation and by OLAF - Actions for damages - Action for a declaration that certain measures taken by OLAF were void and inadmissible for evidentiary purposes before the national authorities - Admissibility - Misuse of powers - Processing of personal data - Rights of the defence))

(2016/C 326/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Athanassios Oikonomopoulos (Athens, Greece) (represented initially by N. Korogiannakis and I. Zarzoura, lawyers, and subsequently by G. Georgios, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, for compensation for the damage caused by the Commission and by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and, secondly, that certain measures taken by OLAF be declared legally void and inadmissible for evidentiary purposes before the national authorities.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Athanassios Oikonomopoulos to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim relief. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Athanassios Oikonomopoulos to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim relief.

---

(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.

1

---
#### People v Layou

4th Dept: 134 AD3d 1510 (Onondaga)

denied reconsideration 8/10/16 (Rivera, J.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                         0001064435
<NAME>                                        Cluett American Corp
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jul-01-2000
<CASH>                                         2,643
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  51,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                   12,268
<INVENTORY>                                    41,068
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,669
<PP&E>                                         28,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          79,197
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    62,167
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (169,540)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,364
<SALES>                                        79,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               79,388
<CGS>                                          50,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               55
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,642)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   497
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,139)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (14,135)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18,274)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Mr. David K. Paylor 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

629 East Main Street 

Richmond, Virginia 23219 

Dear Director Paylor: 

OCT 1 4 2U15 

On July 16,2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

(V ADEQ). The July 2015 submittal addresses the applicable infrastructure elements specified in section 

110(a)(2)(A) through (M) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) which are necessary to implement, maintain, and 

enforce the 2012 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.s) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in 

the Commonwealth ofVirginia. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and 

technically complete, and is reviewing the submittal to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) 

action. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ellen Schmitt, Office 

of Air Program Planning, at 215-814-5787, or sclunitt.eUen@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for 

this rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

-~>~~ 

cc: Michael Dowd, Air Division Director 

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division 

,. 

t:.J Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 1759]


Wisconsin Electric Power Company; Notice of Meetings

June 17, 1998.
    From July 14 to July 16, 1998, the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission staff will be meeting with Wisconsin Electric Power Company 
(WE) and the Collaborative Team to identify and discuss non-project 
uses of project lands and waters and related issues concerning the Way 
Dam and Michigamme Reservoir Project (Project No. 1759), which is 
located on the Michigamme River near Crystal Falls, Michigan. The Way 
Dam impounds the approximate 6,400-acre Michigamme Reservoir. The 
Michigamme Reservoir operates as a storage basin for high spring and 
fall flows, which are released during periods of lower flow in the 
summer and winter. The meetings will be conducted at WE's office, 
located at 800 Industrial Park Drive, Iron Mountain, Michigan 49801. On 
July 14, the meeting will be conducted at 8 a.m., and on July 15 and 
16, 1998, the meetings will be conducted at 9 a.m.
    If you would like more information about the Upper Menominee River 
Basin Projects, in which the Way Dam and Michigamme Reservoir Project 
is part of, please contact one of the individuals:

Patti Leppert-Slack, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE Rm 72-33, Washington, DC 20426, (202) 219-2767, E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c5c4d585e454f454d0240495c5c495e585f404d4f476c4a495e4f024a494802595f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33435247415a505a521d5f564343564147405f52505873555641501d5556571d4640">[email protected]</span></a>
Rita Hayen, Wisconsin Electric Power Company, 333 W. Everett Street, 
Milwaukee, WI 53203, (414) 221-2413, E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e6948f9287c88e879f8388a691838b878f8ac8918f9583888394819f">[email protected]</a>
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16610 Filed 6-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terrell Canty, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 918]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurkin-Torres, J.), rendered March 19, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions concerning the closure of the courtroom during the testimony of the “ghost” undercover police officer are not preserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Sanabria,*301 AD2d 307 [2002]; *People v Davis,*300 AD2d 69 [2002]; *People v Oliphant,*258 AD2d 536 [1999]; *People v Escobar,*226 AD2d 650 [1996]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental brief, either are not properly before this Court, unpreserved for appellate review, or without merit. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Smith and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
No. 10-6850.

#### Bryant William Reed, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1037, 131 S. Ct. 581,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8748.

178 L. Ed. 2d 428,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 389 Fed. Appx. 272.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), Mark E. Kaplan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge:



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WITNESS the due execution hereof this 1st day of March, 2007.



/s/ Mark E. KaplanMark E. KaplanSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be
retained by Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-212.

#### Maria Henrietta Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1044, 131 S. Ct. 597,

178 L. Ed. 2d 435,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8991.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 313.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2318 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2318

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel ENDEAVOUR.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 26 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel ENDEAVOUR.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the 
vessel ENDEAVOUR (United States official number 947869).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                          22,239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  443,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,505
<INVENTORY>                                    694,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,209,569
<PP&E>                                       1,358,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                 635,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,374,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          674,023
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,374
<OTHER-SE>                                     850,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,374,203
<SALES>                                      3,568,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,568,572
<CGS>                                        2,707,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  640,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               225,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,748)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (46,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,906)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.75)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2013325EN.01005201.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/52

---

Action brought on 4 September 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-82/13)

2013/C 325/84

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision on the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights under the European Union pension scheme applying the new General Implementing Provisions for Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations unlawful;

| — | annul the decision to the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights on the basis of the parameters referred to in the General Implementing Provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision to the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights on the basis of the parameters referred to in the General Implementing Provisions for Article 11(2) of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
No. 10-5478.

#### Mauricio Rodriguez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 924, 131 S. Ct. 306,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7357.

178 L. Ed. 2d 199,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 343 Fed. Appx. 223.