alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Alcan, AK Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Alcan, AK Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 1      | 6     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      | 35     | 102    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation by
reference in the  registration  statement on Form S-8 of Duckwall-ALCO  Stores, Inc. of
our report dated April 14, 2006, with respect to the consolidated  balance sheets of
Duckwall-ALCO  Stores, Inc. as of January 29, 2006 and January 30, 2005, and the related
 consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year  period ended January 29, 2006,  which report  appears in the
January 29, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.

Our  report  dated  April  14,
 2006,   on   managements   assessment  of  the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting
as of January 29, 2006,  expresses our opinion that Duckwall-ALCO  Stores, Inc. did not
maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2006
because of the effect of material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the
control criteria related to:

| | 1.
The  Company  has not  established  controls  to require a review of      certain
 information  prepared  for  inclusion in the  Companys  financial      statements.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2.
The Company  has  insufficient  controls  to ensure  that  warehouse      inventory and
cost of sales are properly reflected in the interim financial      statements.
 Specifically,  warehouse  inventory is only  reconciled to the      general ledger
annually.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ KPMG LLP

Omaha, Nebraska May 3, 2006

| |  | 
| |  | 

---
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 Lifecore Subsidiaries
As of September 9, 2006
 State / Country
    
    Percentage of VotingName
    
    of Incorporation
    
    Securities OwnedImplant Support Systems, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    
    100
    %Sustain, Inc.
    
    California
    
    
    100
    %Lifecore Biomedical SpA
    
    Italy
    
    
    100
    %Lifecore Biomedical GmbH
    
    Germany
    
    
    100
    %Lifecore Biomedical, AB
    
    Sweden
    
    
    100
    %Lifecore Biomedical, SAS
    
    France
    
    
    100
    %
No. 10-6577.

#### Michael Raver, Petitioner v. Tim Brunsman, Warden.

562 U.S. 1068, 131 S. Ct. 651,

178 L. Ed. 2d 489,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9325.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 558.
# 3D printing could help DLA cut costs, improve parts support

/ Published Aug. 13, 2015
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, DLA Logistics Operations
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A2 42 0 . PAUL W ADE TAYLOR v . TERRY LEI GH TAYLOR.

In t h i s d iv o rc e a c t i o n , t h e t ri al co u rt gran t ed Terry Lei g h Tay l o r’ s m o t i o n to

en fo rce a s et t l em en t ag reem en t an d en t ered a fi nal ju d g m en t an d d ecree o f d i v o rce.

Pau l W ad e Tay l o r t h en fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap p eal . W e, h o w ev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. A p p e a l s fro m “

j u d gm en t s o r o rd ers in d i v orce, al i m o n y , an d o t her d o m es t i c
rel at i o n s cas es ” m

u st b e m ad e b y ap p l i c a t i o n f or d i scret i o nary ap p eal

. OCGA
§ 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (2 ). “ [C] o m p l ian ce wi th t h e d i s cret i on ary ap p eal s p r o c e d u r e i s ju r i s d ict i o n al .” Fa b e v. Fl oyd

, 1 9 9 Ga. Ap p

. 3 22

, 3 3 2 (1 ) (4 0 5 SE2 d 2 6 5 ) (1 9 9 1 ).

Pau l W ad e Tay l or’ s fai l u re t o fo l l o w t he di s cret i on ary ap peal p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s

o f ju ri sd i ct i o n o v er t hi s d irect ap p eal

. A cco rd i n g l y , t h i s ap peal i s h e r e b y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. July 24, 2019

07/24/2019
# C_2014421EN.01005601.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/56

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 February 2014 — CL v EEA

(Case F-71/13) (1)

1

((Staff cases - Member of the temporary staff - Duty to provide assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Moral harassment on the part of the hierarchical superior - Rejection of the request for an administrative inquiry to be initiated - Action manifestly inadmissible))

2014/C 421/79

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CL (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Environment Agency (represented by: O. Cornu, acting as Agent, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the rejection of the applicant’s request for an administrative inquiry to be initiated with a view to proving or clarifying the facts relating to harassment.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | CL shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Environment Agency. |
| --- | --- |

2.

CL shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Environment Agency.

---

(1)  OJ C 274 of 21/09/2013, p. 32.

1

---
# National Preparedness Month includes emergency prepping for our pets

/ Published Sept. 27, 2021
RICHMOND, Va., 
Being prepared for an emergency means thinking about the needs of all family members—including pets.

During National Preparedness Month the Federal Emergency Management Agency suggests, along with making an emergency kit for your family, make a second kit for your pet and develop a pet care buddy system.

DLA Installation Management Richmond encourages employees to get ready for emergencies by accessing information on the Ready.gov website which includes a Prepare Your Pets for Disasters brochure, and other helpful preparation tips.

Advanced planning is key. If you must wait out a storm or other disaster at home, identify a safe area of the home where you can all stay together. Place the emergency supplies in that room ahead of time and include your pet’s crate and supplies.

If evacuated, do not leave your pet behind! Pets most likely cannot survive alone. Prepare a smaller pet emergency kit to take with you.

Suggested items in a pet emergency kit include food and water for three days, medicine, leash, tags and shot record, special toy, litter pan and food dishes.

Other items pet owners may consider include:-Checking with a local animal shelter or emergency management office to determine if a pet friendly emergency shelter will be set up near your location in the event you have to leave your pet behind.-Making a list of boarding facilities and veterinary offices that may shelter animals and include 24-hour telephone numbers.-Setting up a buddy system with neighbors or friends to help if you can’t get to your pet.-Using a ‘pet inside’ sticker to let first responders know you have a pet.-Getting your pet micro-chipped. A microchip is a small device that can be implanted painlessly under your pet’s skin and will assist in reuniting you with your pet in the event you are separated from them.

Commit today to preparing your family and pets for an emergency.

(Editor’s note: information compiled from FEMA’s Ready.gov website)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Christopher G. Kenber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.

Date: May 10, 2006

| |  | BY: /s/ Christopher G. Kenber
Name:  Christopher G. KenberTitle:  Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24(a)





                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned as an officer and director of both Eagle-Picher Holdings, Inc.
and Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., and as director of Eagle-Picher Technologies,
LLC, hereby consents to and appoints Andries Ruijssenaars and David G. Krall,
and each of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with all
power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2000 fiscal year of
both Eagle-Picher Holdings, Inc. and Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., corporations
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and the State of
Ohio respectively, and of Eagle-Picher Technologies, LLC, a limited liability
company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and any
and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the same as fully to all intents and purposes
as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them, or their or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand on this 21st day
of February, 2001.



/s/ Joel P. Wyler
---------------------------------------
Joel P. Wyler
Director and Chairman of the Board
2018-0037.

#### Clean Energy Future, L.L.C. v. Clean Energy Future-Lordstown, L.L.C.

Trumbull App. No. 2017-T-0110, 2017-0hio-9350. On emergency motion to stay trial court’s order. Motion denied.

French and Fischer, JJ., dissent.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
# C_2014253EN.01006602.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/66

---

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2014 — Othman v Council

(Case T-109/13) (1)

1

2014/C 253/91

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 4.5.2013.

1

---
No. 10-6630.

#### Jaime Avelar Castro, aka Jaime Avelar-Castro, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1016, 131 S. Ct. 537,

178 L. Ed. 2d 394,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8379.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 314.
No. 10-5721.

#### Alan J. Price, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 965, 131 S. Ct. 464,

178 L. Ed. 2d 295,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8103.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated March 30, 2005, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedules and management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the Annual Report
of Dynamics Research Corporation on the Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in
the Registration Statements of Dynamics Research Corporation on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-109973, File No. 333-59706, File No. 333-47838, File No. 333-02805, and
File No. 333-68548).



/s/Grant Thornton LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2005
No. 10-7056.

#### Jose Antonio Celis, Juan Diego Giraldo, and Anayibe Rojas Valderama, Petitioners v. United States.

562 U.S. 1052, 131 S. Ct. 620,

178 L. Ed. 2d 450,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8889.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 U.S. App. D.C. 112, 608 F.3d 818.
#### In the Matter of Martin P.J.S. and Another, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Rhonda Wanda C. J., Appellant; Leake & Watts Services, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[767 NYS2d 607]

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about March 1, 2002, which, insofar as appealed from, terminated respondent-appellant’s parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject children to petitioner agency for the purpose of adoption by their respective foster parents, after a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of the Family Court, that it is in the best interests of the children to terminate parental rights and to free them for adoption by foster families with whom they have bonded and *107who have been providing for their special needs, was supported by the requisite fair preponderance of the evidence *(Matter of Shaka Efion C.,*207 AD2d 740 [1994]). Evidence of the biological mother’s changed circumstances was not sufficient to warrant suspended judgment, given no real relationship between her and her children, and given the strong relationship the children have developed with their respective foster families *(id.; Matter of Latesha Nicole M.,*219 AD2d 521 [1995]). Concur— Buckley, P.J., Saxe, Ellerin, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
No. 10-6148.

#### Michael Joseph Gowan, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1010, 131 S. Ct. 519,

178 L. Ed. 2d 383,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8463.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### Andrew Suckling, Appellant, v Christine Iu et al., Respondents. Christine Iu, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v 35 Spring Street, LLC, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

[54 NYS3d 585]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered July 18, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants’ cross motion to compel arbitration of the eighth through tenth, thirteenth through fifteenth, and eighteenth causes of action in the amended complaint pursuant to the operating agreements governing defendants 52 Reeve LLC and 56 Edison LLC, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The dispute resolution clause (§ 14.11) of the operating agreements for defendants 56 Edison LLC and 52 Reeve LLC provides that “the Members *shall*submit [certain] dispute [s] to an arbitration procedure” (subd [b] [emphasis added]). This unambiguous language evinces the parties’ “unequivocal intent to arbitrate the relevant dispute” *(see Edelman v Poster,*72 AD3d 182, 184 [1st Dept 2010]). The arbitration clause is no mere agreement to agree; it is “clear, explicit and unequivocal,” and does not depend upon “implication or subtlety” *(see Matter of Waldron [Goddess],*61 NY2d 181, 183-184 [1984]). Nor does the lack of a designated arbitration procedure render the clause unenforceable, because CPLR 7504 provides an objective method for supplying that missing term *(see Edelman,*72 AD3d *665at 185-186; *see also Matter of 166 Mamaroneck Ave. Corp. v 151 E. Post Rd. Corp.,*78 NY2d 88, 93 [1991]).

Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, by requiring the parties to engage in an arbitration process, the motion court did not render section 14.11 (c) meaningless. Defendant’s failure to negotiate with plaintiff after receiving notice of the dispute did not constitute an intentional waiver of her right to enforce section 14.11 (b).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.
# C_2014421EN.01006502.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/65

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 April 2014 — Lecolier v Commission

(Case F-123/13) (1)

1

2014/C 421/98

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014, p. 54.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34857-34858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17056]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Kirtland 
Area Office (Sandia)

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Board Committee meeting: Environmental Management 
Site-Specific Advisory Board, Kirtland Area Office (Sandia).

DATES: Wednesday, July 15, 1998; 6:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m. Mountain Daylight 
Time).

ADDRESSES: Citizens' Advisory Board Office, 924 Park Avenue SW-PH #9, 
Albuquerque, New Mexico.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Zamorski, Acting Manager, 
Department of Energy Kirtland Area Office, P.O. Box 5400, Albuquerque, 
NM 87185 (505) 845-4094.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to advise DOE and 
its regulators in the areas of environmental restoration, waste 
management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The Board will conduct a business meeting. A 
final agenda will be available at the meeting Wednesday, July 15, 1998.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Mike Zamorski's office at the address or 
telephone number listed above. Requests must be received 5 days prior 
to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Designated Federal Officer is empowered 
to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly 
conduct of business. Each individual wishing to make public comment 
will

[[Page 34858]]

be provided a maximum of 5 minutes to present their comments.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 
1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585 between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available by writing to Mike Zamorksi, 
Department of Energy Kirtland Area Office, P.O. Box 5400, Albuquerque, 
MN 87185, or by calling (505) 845-4094.

    Issued at Washington, DC on June 23, 1998.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-17056 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 10-6706.

#### Lamarcus Terrell Thomas, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 542,

178 L. Ed. 2d 398,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8368.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 394.
No. 10-5051.

#### Hosea Prescott, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 900, 131 S. Ct. 234,

178 L. Ed. 2d 155,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6191.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.