alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA support praised by logisticians from Army global-response aviation unit in new video

/ Published Aug. 29, 2016
RICHMOND, Va., 

A new video in the Defense Logistics Agency’s “Logistics On Location” series highlights the support DLA Aviation personnel provide the Army’s 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade, based in Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

The brigade must be ready at all times to deploy anywhere in the world with as little as 96 hours’ notice, Army Chief Warrant Officer 2 Roger Passie, the aviation materiel officer for the brigade, explains in the approximately three-minute segment. 

The main aircraft the unit supports are the OH-58 Kiowa, UH-60 Black Hawk and CH-47 Chinook helicopters.

To keep the aircraft ready to go, they rely on DLA Aviation to supply any of the 349 line items of stock materiel. “On a daily basis, we could order $500 to $2 million worth of parts, depending on the maintenance criteria,” Passie said.

DLA provides 30-40 percent of those parts, added Chief Warrant Officer 2 Claudia Snowden. “The items I get and the service I get is really excellent with DLA,” she notes in the video.

Soldiers from other activities in the brigade also discuss their support for the unit's rotary-wing aircraft, including ordering, receiving and transporting repair parts; repairing avionics, weapons and engines; and filtering and pumping approximately 1,500 gallons of fuel per day.

“It’s important for us to get our parts immediately so we can meet the missions and support the other units that have field exercises and support the daily flights,” explained Army Spc. Colton Sheridan, an avionics, weapons and electronics repairer.
# Employee Spotlight: Marlon Wentz

/ Published April 27, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs.*

**Name:**Marlon Wentz

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City

**Years of service to DLA:** 12.5 years

**What is your job title and what do you do specifically?** As a supply technician, I process orders for aircraft engine parts placed by the production control technicians for the mechanics. When the replacement parts are processed and sent to me, I restock them and enter the receipts into our electronic parts database.  

**How do you support the warfighter?**While processing orders for jet engine parts, I ensure the correct national stock number and quantity are sent to the mechanics. My efficiency has a direct effect on maximizing the production process of the aircraft used to empower our national defense system.

**What do you like most about your job and why?**My job gives me a fantastic feeling of accomplishment since I know I have an important role in maintaining the aircraft that support our nation’s security. I have the best co-workers and supervisor in this mission who are quick to assist me on more difficult tasks. Everyone has a pleasant disposition, and they care very much about my well-being.

**What is your fondest memory of working for DLA Aviation?**My fondest memories of being a part of DLA Aviation are the Christmas parties and picnics.  It gives me the opportunity to connect with coworkers that I haven’t seen in a while. The food is always good at these events, but the people are the best. Working at DLA is like having a second family.

**What is your favorite military aircraft? Why?**The Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II is my favorite aircraft. I’m impressed by its ability to fly quietly when so close to the ground on low-level runs.
EXHIBIT 32.2
    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), the undersigned, David C. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of Network-1 Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify to his knowledge, that:
 
 The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/ David C. Kahn
 Chief Financial Officer
 November 14, 2013
# Former Susquehanna first sergeant departs DLA; receives medal for service

/ Published May 20, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Completing a 1-year tour as Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna installation senior enlisted advisor, Army 1st Sgt. Michael S. Warren, handed over the organization’s colors on May 13 and received the Defense Meritorious Service Medal for his service from April 2015 to May 2016.

Discussing Warren’s time with DLA Distribution Susquehanna and the installation, commander Army Col. Corey New said “1st Sgt. Warren has contributed immeasurably to this organization.  He’s one of the finest [Non-Commissioned Officers] I’ve ever had the privilege of serving with in my 25 years in the Army.”

New went on to describe Warren as an “outstanding and dedicated Senior Enlisted Advisor and leader, commitment to excellence, leadership, mission support and engagement.”  

During his time with DLA, Warren increased focus on training management, leadership engagement and enhanced opportunities for military members within the organization.

He contributed to the development of the DLA Distribution Susquehanna leadership training program, created in August 2015, revamping of the new hire on-boarding process, and increasing training opportunities for non-supervisory employees.

Warren coordinated the efforts for two of DLA Distribution’s largest missions during his tenure.  During July and August 2015, he was utilized the reservist support of the 304th Sustainment Brigade, ensuring metrics were delivered, and he aided in developing the concept of using organic and non-organic reservists from the Army, Navy and Air Force to remain on-time in HAZMAT operations.

He established a week-long training class that taught 80 first line civilian supervisors “Leadership 101.”  He continued monthly leadership sustainment training to ensure that all leaders were providing leadership necessary in accomplishing the mission. 

According to New, Warren’s commitment to the Non-Commissioned Officer Corps and leadership principles was on constant display on a daily basis through his interaction with military members, the civilian workforce and the installation agencies.  He was instrumental in establishing NCO professional development with distribution centers through the network.  He also established a military night that brought together military members of DLA, US Army Recruiting Command, Marine Corps Recruiting Command and Carlisle Barracks for the enhancement of the military community.  

He also gave back to the surrounding community, supporting organizations such as the Bridge Street Community Food Bank and Middleton VFW.  

Warren’s next assignment is at Ft. Bliss, Texas, where he will attend the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy.  After completing the 9-month long program, he will be promoted to the rank of Sergeant Major.
#### Kristen M. Lanicci, Appellant, v Dean J. Hansen, Jr., et al., Respondents.

[59 NYS3d 753]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), dated October 24, 2016, which denied that branch of her motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability and, in effect, denied that branch of her motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the affirmative defenses that allege comparative negligence.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and dismissing the affirmative defenses that allege comparative negligence is granted.

On August 22, 2014, a vehicle operated by the plaintiff and a vehicle owned by the defendant Dean J. Hansen, Sr., and operated by the defendant Dean J. Hansen, Jr., collided in the intersection of Route 9W and Westside Avenue in Haverstraw, Rockland County. The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants to recover damages for personal injuries she alleges that she sustained in the accident. The plaintiff subsequently moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability and dismissing the affirmative defenses that allege comparative negligence. The Supreme Court denied that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability and, in effect, denied that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the affirmative defenses that allege comparative negligence. We reverse.

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, a plaintiff must establish, prima facie, not only that the opposing party was negligent, but also that the plaintiff was free from comparative fault *(see Thoma v Ronai,*82 NY2d 736, 737 [1993]; *Bentick v Gatchalian,*147 AD3d 890, 891 [2017]; *Moluh v Vord,*143 AD3d 680 [2016]; *Phillip v D&D*
      *688
      *Carting Co., Inc.,*136 AD3d 18, 24 [2015]). Here, the plaintiff established her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability. The evidence submitted on her motion, which included her deposition testimony and a certified copy of the police accident report, demonstrated, prima facie, that she was not at fault in the happening of the accident, and that the sole proximate cause of the accident was the conduct of the defendant driver in entering the intersection without stopping at a red traffic signal, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1110 (a) and 1111 (d) (1) *(see Bentick v Gatchalian,*147 AD3d 890 [2017]; *Chuachingco v Christ,*132 AD3d 798, 798-799 [2015]; *see also Turner v Butler,*139 AD3d 715, 716 [2016]; *Farris v Reyes,*119 AD3d 734, 734 [2014]; *Joaquin v Franco,*116 AD3d 1009, 1009-1010 [2014]). In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiffs motion.

Balkin, J.P., Sgroi, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                         CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triton PCS,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, Michael E.
Kalogris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                             /s/ Michael E. Kalogris
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name: Michael E. Kalogris
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                             Date: November 12, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34473-34474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-130-1020-00; GP8-0233]


Cancellation of Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council Tour 
and Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District.


[[Page 34474]]


ACTION: The tour and meeting of the Eastern Washington Resource 
Advisory Council scheduled June 25, 1998, in Spokane, Washington has 
been canceled.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Hubbard, Bureau of Land 
Management, Spokane District Office, 1103 N. Fancher Road, Spokane, 
Washington, 99212; or call 509-536-1200.

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
Joseph K. Buesing,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-16901 Filed 6-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
No. D-2537.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Nicholas Andres Manzini.

562 U.S. 813, 131 S. Ct. 404,

178 L. Ed. 2d 269,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7628.

October 4, 2010.

Nicholas Andres Man-zini, of Miami, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 10-390.

#### Edwin A. Ehlers, II, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1005, 131 S. Ct. 536,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8610.

178 L. Ed. 2d 375,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.

Same case below, 69 M.J. 190.
No. 10-6.

#### Global-Tech Appliances, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. SEB S.A.

562 U.S. 960, 131 S. Ct. 458,

178 L. Ed. 2d 286,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8068.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 1360.
NO. SEMS ID DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES

1 140791- 140794 1/16/88 - 7/14/88 U.S. EPA Public Administrative Record Site Index for the Remeidal Action at the Belvidere Municipal Landfill- Original - Update 2 (Documents on this index are included by reference into this deletion docket) -

2 140790 6/7/90 U.S. EPA Public Administrative Record Site Index for the Removal Action at the Belvidere Municipal Landfill - Original (Documents on this index are included by reference into this deletion docket) 3

3 465045 5/8/10 IL Dept. of Public Health None Water Well Sealing Form 1

4 465046 11/4/11 IL EPA None Laboratory Results - Fish Contamination at Deppit Pond 3

5 465047 11/29/11 IL EPA None Laboratory Results - Soil Contamination at Deppit Pond 6

6 468093 3/31/14 Bonnet, L., IEPA Karl, R., U.S. EPA IEPA Letter re: Concurrence with the Final Close-Out Report at the Belvidere Municipal Landfill Site 1 

## Belvidere, Boone County, Illinois

June 23, 2014 SEMS ID: 913781 

## Belvidere Municipal Landfill U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Remedial Action

Deletion Docket For
No. 10-5796.

#### Robert C. Cook, Petitioner v. Michigan Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 938, 131 S. Ct. 395,

178 L. Ed. 2d 225,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7538,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00200-CR

EX PARTE: MELISSA DAWN WRAGG

On Appeal from the 276th District Court

Marion County, Texas

Trial Court No. F14444-A

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Melissa Dawn Wragg was arrested after officers found her in a home where

methamphetamine was being manufactured. She filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas 

corpus, alleging that her detention in the Marion County Jail was unlawful because “no probable 

cause exists for the detention.” Specifically, Wragg challenged the State’s belief that exigent 

circumstances justified the warrantless search that led to her arrest. The trial court denied the 

application after a hearing, finding that there was probable cause to support the detention. 

Wragg appeals the denial of her application. 

We review a trial court’s grant or denial of relief under an application for writ of habeas 

corpus for an abuse of discretion. In re Shaw, 204 S.W.3d 9, 14 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, 

pet. ref’d). The writ of habeas corpus is an extraordinary remedy which will issue only if the 

applicant has no adequate remedy at law. Ex parte Weise, 55 S.W.3d 617, 619 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2001); Shaw, 204 S.W.3d at 14; Ex parte Brooks, 97 S.W.3d 639, 640 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, 

no pet.) (denying review of pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus which alleged accused’s 

arrest was based solely on racial profiling without probable cause or reasonable suspicion 

because accused could raise issues in suppression motion). 

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has “held that an applicant may not use a pretrial 

writ to . . . challenge the denial of a motion to suppress.” Weise, 55 S.W.3d at 620. We find that 

Wragg has an adequate remedy at law. She can pursue the claims asserted in her habeas 

application in a suppression motion. Id.; Brooks, 97 S.W.3d at 640 (Also noting, “If the State 
3

does not promptly file a case against [the accused] by indictment or information or does not 

promptly proceed to trial, the Code of Criminal Procedure provides other remedies as well.”). 

Because Wragg has an adequate remedy at law, the trial court did not abuse its discretion 

by denying the application. Accordingly, we affirm the order denying Wragg’s habeas 

application.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: November 25, 2013

Date Decided: November 26, 2013

Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001064435
<NAME>                          Cluett American Corp
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Oct-02-1999
<CASH>                          7,062
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   51,368
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     89,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                151,361
<PP&E>                          47,596
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  249,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           61,937
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     54,724
<COMMON>                        1
<OTHER-SE>                      (165,325)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    249,097
<SALES>                         247,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                247,756
<CGS>                           179,043
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   57,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                79
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              19,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (10,877)
<INCOME-TAX>                    751
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (11,628)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (11,628)
<EPS-BASIC>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
#### People v Guzman-Moore

3d Dept: 144 AD3d 1267 (Albany)

denied 3/21/17 (Garcia, J.)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16859]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, July 6, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-16859 Filed 6-19-98; 4:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
No. 10-5349.

#### Ruby Spencer, Petitioner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

562 U.S. 954, 131 S. Ct. 282,

178 L. Ed. 2d 253,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7667,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 554.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, (the Report), of Triton PCS, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, David D. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David D. ClarkName:

David D. ClarkTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

May 10, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Triton PCS, Inc. and will be retained by Triton PCS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filings of Triton PCS, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.