Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 1998 / Notices 33959

TA–W–34,502; Master Casual Wear,

Ripley, TN: April 17, 1997.

TA–W–34,221; Pekin Plastics, Pekin, IN:

January 23, 1997.

TA–W–34,394; Action West, Div. Of Don

Shapiro Industries, El Paso, TX:

March 16, 1997.

TA–W–34,353; Lane Plywood, Engene,

OR: March 12, 1997.

TA–W–34,365; Smith of Galeton Gloves,

Galeton, PA: March 19, 1997.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with Section

250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the month of June, 1998.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of Section 250

of the Trade Act must be met:

(1) that a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, (including workers

in any agricultural firm or appropriate

subdivision thereof) have become totally

or partially separated from employment

and either—

(2) that sales or production, or both,

of such firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely,

(3) that imports from Mexico or

Canada of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

such firm or subdivision have increased,

and that the increases in ports

contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of

separation and to the decline in sales or

production of such firm or subdivision;

or

(4) that there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

There was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–02327; Lone Star Cutting

Services, Inc., El Paso, TX

NAFTA–TAA–02270, A & B; Forstmann

& Co., Dublin, GA, Milledgeville

Plant, Milledgeville, GA and

Louisville Plant, Louisville, GA

NAFTA–TAA–02303; General

Dynamics, Defense Systems,

Pittsfield, MA

NAFTA–TAA–02260; The Sero Co., Inc.,

Cordele, GA

NAFTA–TAA–02280; Denise Lingerie,

Div. of House of Ronnie, Inc.,

Johnson City, TN

The investigation revealed that the

criteria for eligibility have not been met

for the reasons specified.

NAFTA–TAA–02375; Transcity

Terminal Warehouse, Indiana,

Distribution Warehouse,

Indianapolis, IN

NAFTA–TAA–02330; Young and

Morgan Trucking, Lyons, OR

NAFTA–TAA–02292; Caliber Logistics,

Inc., Vancouver, WA

NAFTA–TAA–02367; Independent

Order of Foresters, San Diego, CA

The investigation revealed that the

workers of the subject firm did not

produce an article within the meaning

of Section 250(a) of the Trade Act, as

amended.

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

NAFTA–TAA–02333; The Proctor and

Gamble Manufacturing Co., Health

Care Div., Greenville, SC: April 15,

1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02313; Champion

Products, Inc., ‘‘Screen Printing

Department’’ and ‘‘Embroidery

Department’’ Dunn, NC: March 31,

1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02355; Megas Beauty

Care, Inc., Div. of American Safety

Razor, Sparks, NE: March 31, 1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02326; Bugatti, Inc., New

England Leater, Rochester, NH:

March 31, 1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02362; Rotadyne,

Engineered Roller Div., Lancaster,

NY: April 27, 1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02363; Sheldahl. Inc.,

Aberdeen, SD: March 30, 1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02372; Sinclair

Technologies, Inc., Tonawanda,

NY: April 30, 1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02337; Kaufman

Footwear Corp., Dushore, PA: April

15, 1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02357; J.C. Viramontes,

Inc., d/b/a/ International Garment

Finishers, Inc., El Paso, TX: April

29, 1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02339; Eagle Precision

Technologies, Jackson Plant,

Jackson, MI: April 1, 1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02380; Kimberly Clark

Corp., Tecnol Products, Inc., Del

Rio, TX: May 8, 1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02386; Jostens

Photography, Inc., Webster, NY:

May 11, 1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02416; Easton Corp.,

Commercial Controls Div.,

Salisbury, MD: May 11, 1997.

NAFTA–TAA–02370; Garland

Commerical Industries, Inc., Div. of

Welbilt Corp., Freeland, PA: May 5,

1997.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of June 1998.

Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20210 during normal

business hours or will be mailed to

persons who write to the above address.

Dated: June 11, 1998.

Grant D. Beale,

Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 98–16560 Filed 6–19–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[NAFTA–02329]

Penske Logistics, Incorporated,

Bloomington, IN; Dismissal of

Application for Reconsideration

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an

application for administrative

reconsideration was filed with the

Acting Director of the Office of Trade

Adjustment Assistance for workers at

Penske Logistics, Incorporated,

Bloomington, Indiana. The review

indicated that the application contained

no new substantial information which

would bear importantly on the

Department’s determination. Therefore,

dismissal of the application was issued.

NAFTA–02329; Penske Logistics,

Incorporated, Bloomington, Indiana (June

11, 1998).

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 12th day

of June, 1998.

Grant D. Beale,

Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 98–16551 Filed 6–19–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M