**SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST** (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)
SIP Submitted by : West Virginia Department of the Environmental Protection Date Submitted: June 6, 2012 Subject: Amendments to the Ambient Air Quality Standards (45CSR8) Completeness Review Completed by : Asrah Khadr Date Completed: July

18 , 2012
**Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE** 

**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)** 1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof. 1. L etter dated June 6, 2012 from Randy C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretary , West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to Shawn M. Garvin, Region III Administrator. X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 2. L egislative Rule was filed by the West Virginia DEP

Division of Air Quality

on May 1, 2012 , in accordance with the West Virginia Legislature and 40 CFR Part 51. Effective date of the revision is June 1, 2012

. X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. West Virginia has legal authority to adopt and implement the plan under section 22

- 5

- 4 of the West Virginia Code. X
4. A cop y of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 4. Notice of Final Filing and Adoption of a Legislative Rule Authorized by

the West Virgi nia Legislature shows Title 45 S eries 8, 45CSR8, Ambient Air Quality Standards was filed on May 1, 2012, and became effective on June 1, 2012 via the authorization of Randy

C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretary . West Virginia provided a cop y of the Legislative R ule which indicates the changes made. X**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)**

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. A letter dated June 6, 2012 from Randy C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretary , West Virginia DEP to Shawn M. Garvin, Region III Administrator indicates that all state and federal administrative procedural requirements had been met. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved b y EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. A cop y of the public hearing noti ce run in the Charleston Newspapers on June 10, 2011

. A Copy of the public hearing notice run in the West Virginia Register on June 10, 2011. X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. A l etter dated June 6, 2012 from Randy C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretary , West Virginia DEP to Shawn M. Garvin, Region III Administrator indicates that all state and federal administrative procedural requirements had been met. X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. 8. Public H earing’s Reporter’s Certification shows an oral comment was received; but no written comments were received . Th e comment was addressed b y West Virginia DEP. X**Technical Materials EPA REQUIREMENT**  **STATE SUBMITTAL (X)**  1. I dentification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Sulfur oxide s , particulate matter, carbon monoxi de, ozone,

nitrogen dioxid e , and lead

. X
2. I dentification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. Not applicable. NA

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from af fected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 3. Not applicable. NA

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemente d. 4. The SIP revision establishes ambient air quality standards equivalent to the national primary and secondary

ambient air quality standards established under section 109 of the Clean Air Act, and promulgated b y the EPA under 40 CFR Part 50

. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analy sis. 5. Not applicable. NA

6. Evidence, where necessary , that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology

. 6. Not applicable. NA
7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary , to ensure emission levels. 7. Not applicable. NA**EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL**  **(X)**

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 8. Not applicable. NA
9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why .) 9. Not applicable. NA

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. Not applicable. NA