alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM UNITED
CAPITAL  CORP.'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE  QUARTER  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND NOTES,
THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1,000
       
<S>                                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                         3,637
<SECURITIES>                                                     379
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 18,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     560
<INVENTORY>                                                    7,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              31,301
<PP&E>                                                        15,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 8,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               116,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         40,162
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                         529
<OTHER-SE>                                                    34,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 116,918
<SALES>                                                       13,670
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              19,560
<CGS>                                                          9,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 16,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               (121)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                2,815
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   1,296
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            1,519
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   1,519
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    .28
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothus Dallas, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 551]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered July 15, 2015, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of three to six years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). Regardless of whether the evidence established that defendant unlawfully entered an office building as a whole, or the portion of the building constituting a private school, the evidence clearly established that defendant was not licensed or privileged to enter a teachers’ lounge, where he was found rummaging through a teacher’s bag. A witness testified, with a sufficient degree of certainty, that the room was marked by a sign indicating that it was for faculty only, and the evidence supports the conclusion that the room was not open to the public *(see e.g. People v Midgette,*115 AD3d 603, 604 [1st Dept 2014], *lv denied*23 NY3d 965 [2014]; *People v Jenkins,*213 AD2d 279 [1st Dept 1995], *lv denied*85 NY2d 974 [1995]). This theory was encompassed in the charge set forth in the indictment. There is no merit to defendant’s interpretation of the sign as barring entry by the school’s students, but permitting entry by strangers.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
No. 10-5560.

#### Joe Mack Brown, Jr., Petitioner v. Don Mills, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution.

562 U.S. 929, 131 S. Ct. 394,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7346.

178 L. Ed. 2d 208,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### State of Florida, ex rel. Fred Waite, ED. O. Brown, Frederick Vanroy, Maurice Lee, Howard Hamp, O. A. Clark, Bertha Boomer, Mrs. W. L. Foster, Fred Kellogg, and C. P. Corrigan, Relators, vs. R. A. Gray, as Secretary of the State of Florida, *Respondent.*

144 So. 356.

*110En Banc.

Opinion filed October 21, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied November 2, 1932.

*H. O. Brdwn,*for Relators.

Per Curiam.

This is a petition for mandamus against the Secretary of State to require that officer to certify to the Boards of County Commissioners of the several counties of Florida the names of nominees of the> “Liberty Party” to be printed upon the general election ballots for the General Election to be held November 8, 1932.

The present status of the statute law on the subject of printing) names upon the general election ballots was exhaustively reviewed and discussed in an opinion of this Court in the case of State ex rel. Barnett v. Gray, Secretary of State, filed October 18, 1932 (107 Fla. 73, 144 So. 349). Upon the authority of that opinion the issuance of an alternative writ in this case must also be denied.

Alternative writ of mandamus denied.

Bueord, C.J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2188 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2188

      For the relief of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for the 
   proportionate share of tribal funds and annuities under treaties 
  between the Pottawatomi Nation and the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 14 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

 Mr. Inouye (for himself and Mr. Simon) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      For the relief of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for the 
   proportionate share of tribal funds and annuities under treaties 
  between the Pottawatomi Nation and the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT.

    Notwithstanding the sovereign immunity of the United States, any 
statute of limitations, lapse of time, bar of laches, res judicata, 
collateral estoppel, or any other procedural defense, or any other 
provision of law, the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay to the 
Pottawatomi Nation in Canada, out of any money in the Treasury of the 
United States not otherwise appropriated, $________, which shall be 
equal to the sum of--
            (1) the proportionate share of the tribal funds and 
        annuities that arise under treaties between the Pottawatomi 
        Nation and the United States that, but for the residence of the 
        Pottawatomi Nation in Canada  and  outside  of  the  
        territorial  limits  of  the United States, would have been 
        compensable under the Indian Claims Commission Act (25 U.S.C. 
        70 et seq.); plus
            (2) interest computed at a rate of 5 percent per year on 
        the amounts calculated under paragraph (1).

SEC. 2. ATTORNEY FEES.

    (a) In General.--Not more than 10 percent of the amount paid to the 
Pottawatomi Nation in Canada pursuant to section 1 may be used to pay 
attorney fees arising from services rendered in connection with claims 
of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada relating to the compensation 
authorized under such section.
    (b) Penalties.--Any person licensed to practice law in the United 
States who knowingly receives a payment in violation of subsection (a) 
shall, upon conviction, be guilty of an infraction under section 
3559(a)(9) of title 18, United States Code, and shall be subject to a 
fine in an amount not to exceed $1,000.

                                 <all>
```
## 1998 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

4-21-1998 

# Unit ed S t a t es v

. C ottm a n
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ock e t 96-5492

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1998

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1998 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U nit e d S t a t e s v

. C ottm a n " (1998). 1998 D e cisio n s . P ape r 83. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1998/83

### Filed April 21, 1998

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 96-5492
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. STANLEY COTTMAN, Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey D.C. Criminal Action No. 95-cr-00661 Before: SLOVITER and ROTH, Circuit Judges, LUDWIG,1 District Judge
ORDER The petition for panel rehearing filed by the appel lee in the above-entitled case having been submitted to th e judges who participated in the decision of this court and all judges who concurred in the decision having asked for rehe aring, the petition for rehearing is granted so that the p anel opinion and the dissent can be amended. The amended opinion and dissent are being filed at this time.

___________________________________________________ ______________ 1. Honorable Edmund V. Ludwig, United States Distri ct Court Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by de signation.

### By the Court,

/s/ Jane R. Roth Circuit Judge Dated: 4/21/98 A True Copy: Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,137
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,435
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,657
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,648
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          62,550
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            61,964
<LOANS>                                        263,954
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 384,133
<DEPOSITS>                                     318,593
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,740
<LONG-TERM>                                     39,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,944
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 384,133
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,662
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,172
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,355
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,189
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,933
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,286
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,903
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,970
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,970
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,407
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.98
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,028
<LOANS-PAST>                                       327
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,686
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      171
<RECOVERIES>                                       111
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,726
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,726
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert C. Silzer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GPS Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is
made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date:  April 19, 2004                /s/Robert C. Silzer
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Robert C. Silzer
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014361EN.01002902.xml

| 13.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/29

---

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2014 — AbbVie v EMA

(Case T-29/13) (1)

1

2014/C 361/44

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.

1

---
No. 10-5812.

#### Michael S. Buford, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 938, 131 S. Ct. 349,

178 L. Ed. 2d 226,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7370.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 831.
No. 09-11268.

#### Dennis Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1061, 131 S. Ct. 637,

178 L. Ed. 2d 477,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9067.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 366 Fed. Appx. 66.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1716]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 United States Code, Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of 
the following National Institute of General Medical Sciences Initial 
Review Group (IRG) meeting:

    Name of IRG: Biomedical Research and Research Training.
    Date: March 12-13, 1998.
    Time: March 12--8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m., March 13--8:00 a.m.-
adjournment.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, Maryland 20815.
    Contact Person: Drs. Carole Latker and Irene Glowinski, 
Scientific Review Administrators, NIGMS, Natcher Building--Room 1AS-
13, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, Telephone: 301-594-3663.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review research training grant 
applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. The 
discussions of these applications could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with these 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.821, 
Biophysics and Physiological Sciences; 93.859, Pharmacological 
Sciences; 93.862, Genetics Research; 93.863, Cellular and Molecular 
Basis of Disease Research; 93.880, Minority Access Research Careers 
(MARC); and 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support (MBRS)], 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: January 16, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-1716 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# DLA Indo-Pacific chief of staff honored in farewell 

/ Published Aug. 26, 2021
JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii, 
Defense Logistics Agency Indo-Pacific, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, bid farewell to Chief of Staff John Hamilton August 11, 2021.  DLA Indo-Pacific Commander, Navy Capt. Jason Adams honored Hamilton for his various accomplishments over the past decade. 

During his tenure as CoS from August 2011 – August 2021, he integrated over 1,400 employees dispersed over DLA Indo-Pacific vast area of responsibility.  He served as the principal advisor to the commander for administration of financial, human resources, administration, communications, safety and occupational health, operations research, security and intelligence and logistics analytical studies. He also served as both the CoS and Deputy Commander as the enterprise worked to fill the Deputy position in light of the incumbent’s retirement. 

He stayed relevant in Agency business and ensured DLA Indo-Pacific coordinated in all regional operations in the areas of Strategic Planning, Enterprise Integration, Agency Governance, Equal Employment Opportunities, Strategic Communications, Legislative Affairs, Installation Support, Intelligence and Security, Regional front office staff management and protocol. Simply put, Hamilton’s care, foresight, skill, and leadership allowed DLA Indo-Pacific to successfully support the Combatant Commander through this dynamic change management period in the Agency’s history.  

“His assignment as the Chief of Staff has been performed flawlessly and highlights the brilliant and outstanding support he will continue to provide in his new role as the Indo-Pacific Director for Installation Management,” Capt. Adams said. Hamilton departs the CoS position proud of the legacy of the professionalism and distinguished record of performance which he will take with him as the new Site Director for DLA Installation Management Indo-Pacific. 

When asked if he could encapsulate the past decade into a couple of sentences, John said, “I think people believe who they are now is who they will be in 10 years.  I thought just that when I joined DLA in 2011.  However, life is a process of growing and changing; I have done both.  I met some of the most amazing people working for DLA that have and will continue to have a purposeful impact in my life.  They taught me the importance of remaining ambitious, while believing and moving others toward being equally ambitious, bring value to what you do every day (personally and professionally) and don’t worry if others see or don’t see that value, focus on strengths and continue to build them through continuous learning, enjoy what I do and try and find ways to bring enjoyment to others, and lastly, never stop caring about doing the right thing all the time.”

Hamilton will be transferring to DLA Installation Management on August 15, 2021 as the new Site Director for the Indo-Pacific Office. His selection also comes with a promotion to GS15. Bravo Zulu, John Hamilton and fair winds and following seas on your new endeavor.