alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Dauphin County Crisis Response Team sniper leads weapons course for DLA Police 

/ Published Oct. 25, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Police officers stationed at Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management at Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, participated in an armed vehicle defense course conducted by sniper team leader and AVD Instructor Corporal Walter Cook of the Dauphin County Crisis Response Team.

The training took place on the weapons range at Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna Oct. 11. 

Participants were instructed on the advantages and disadvantages of weapon use inside of the vehicle, proper vehicle positioning and vehicle as a weapon concepts.                 Defense Logistics Agency Police Officer Joseph Delicati participates in an armed vehicle defense class provided by the Dauphin County Crisis Response Team for DLA Police Department team members at Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna, Oct. 11, 2023. Photo provided by DLA Police Lieutenant Richard Michener.                            Dauphin County Crisis Response Team sniper leads weapons course for DLA Police                            Defense Logistics Agency Police Officer Joseph Delicati participates in an armed vehicle defense class provided by the Dauphin County Crisis Response Team for DLA Police Department team members at Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna, Oct. 11, 2023. Photo provided by DLA Police Lieutenant Richard Michener.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Distribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 231010-D-D0441-3920

“Police officers spend a large amount of their time working in and around vehicles,” stated Cook. “When violence occurs, frequently firearms are in that situation and officers need to understand the capabilities and limitations of their firearms. Armed Vehicle Defense training will help officers gain the knowledge to be purposeful and reactive to make them safer when fighting in and around vehicles.”

“The laboratory portion demonstrated the capabilities or limitations of the department’s duty ammunition on different areas of a vehicle,” said DLA Police Instructor, Lieutenant Richard Michener. “Officers first engaged targets from the driver’s seat through the windshield and examined how the points of impact were affected by the glass.”

The vehicle was then shot in the areas believed to provide cover putting testing preconceived notions of protection. This established which areas provided the most effective cover an officer could use in or around a vehicle. Officers were then instructed on how to maximize the use of cover with unconventional shooting positions that also provided increased mobility.

“The training was highly beneficial for everyone that participated. DLA police officers made good use of the opportunity to learn and practice an important skill in a challenging and dynamic setting,” Michener said.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVRIONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6117-1]


Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste in the United States: 
1997 Update

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In recent years, community officials and the general public 
have increased their attention to the waste generated by households, 
institutions, and commercial businesses. They have used information 
about municipal solid waste (MSW) to plan for programs to reduce and 
recycle this waste and to properly dispose of the remainder. The 
``Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste in the United States'' 
report was first prepared by EPA in 1986 in order to determine the 
amounts of waste generated, recovered, and discarded in the nation, and 
to project amounts of waste which will be managed in the future. The 
report has been updated six times since its initial publication in 
1986. Planners nation-wide use this special study to estimate the 
amount and types of MSW that may be generated in their communities, and 
thus are able to plan more effectively for the management of the wastes 
generated, recovered, and/or discarded.
    The Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste in the United States: 
1997 Update report is now available. The 1997 Update is similar to the 
1996 Update, but it contains updated information on the types and 
amounts of municipal solid waste generated, recovered, and discarded in 
the United States through 1996. Some new informational categories are 
also included in the 1997 Update. These include an expanded discussion 
of the markets for recovered recyclable materials.
    Finally, due to sustained interest in tracking national generation, 
recovery, and discard rates for MSW, EPA plans to continue providing 
annual updates of this Report as a service to its stakeholders from 
State and local governments, industry, environmental groups, and the 
public.

DATES: June 26, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
A paper copy of Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste in the United 
States: 1997 Update (EPA Publication Number EPA530-98-R-007) or the 
Report's Executive Summary (EPA Publication Number EPA530-S-98-007) may 
be obtained by calling the RCRA Hotline at 1-800-424-9346. The Report 
is also available in electronic format on the Internet System through 
the EPA Public Access Server at www.epa.gov.

    Dated: May 5, 1998.
Elizabeth A. Cotsworth,
Acting Director, Office of Solid Waste.
[FR Doc. 98-17123 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
2017-0673.

#### State ex rel. Knuckles v. Judges of the 4th Dist. & 9th Dist. Courts of Appeals.

In Mandamus and Procedendo. On respondents’ motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed. On motion to dismiss respondents’ motion to dismiss. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
Mission Checklists

psflight.org

FOR SAFE OPERATIONS OF DRONES

Arrival Checklist

1. If day and operating out of back of vehicle, point

vehicle into sun.!

2. Remove case and place on level surface.!

3. Check distance to nearest airport and/or controlled

airspace using smartphone or tablet app.!

4. If required, use VHF aviation transceiver, to contact

tower of field if closer than 5 NM.!

5. Inform tower / CTAF of UAS ops, location, and max

height of flight.!

Pre-Flight Checklist

1. Remove transmitter.!

2. Router - On!

3. Transmitter - On!

4. Toggle Switches - Full Up!

5. Video Monitor - On!

6. Remove UAS from case.!

7. Gimbal Lock & Lens Cap - Removed!

8. Micro-SD card - Inserted.!

9. UAS Battery - Inserted!

10. Place UAS in clear and safe launch and recovery

position if it returns to home.!

11. UAS Battery - On!

12. Compass calibrated

13. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified!

14. DJI Application - Load!

15. DJI application - Connect to Camera!

16. SD Card - Format!

17. Camera - Full Up!

18. Satellite Connections - Verified!

19. Charge Levels - Safe for Flight!

20. Video Recording - Start!

21. Takeoff!

After Take-Off Checklist

1. Hover approximately ten feet above the ground

to confirm UAS is under control. Look / listen for

defects

2. All sticks operate correctly while in hover

3. Monitor battery power

4. Keep line-of-sight with UAS if possible

5. Monitor signal strenght

Pre-Landing Checklist

1. Camera - Full Up!

2. Video Recorder - Stop!

3. Landing Zone - Clear / Safe

Post-Landing Checklist

Returning to Flight Immediately

1. Battery - Remove & Replace!

2. Wifi Connection to Monitor - Verified!

3. DJI application - Connect to Camera!

4. Takeoff!

End Of Flight Checklist

1. Battery - Off

2. Transmitter - Off

3. Router - Off

4. Notify Tower/CTAF - End of Ops
#### People v Forget

3d Dept: 136 AD3d 1115 (Franklin)

denied 8/15/16 (Fahey, J.)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MANUEL A. DONASTORG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3725

[December 19, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Martin S. Fein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16006342 CF10A.

Carla P. Lowry of Lowry at Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# David M. Koch

/ Published Feb. 1, 2021

David Koch leads the Research and Development program at the Defense Logistics Agency, managing an annual budget valued over $100 million. He maintains oversight of programs focused on Castings, Forgings, Batteries, Additive Manufacturing, Military Uniforms, Combat Rations, Micro-electronics, Energy, Storage and Distribution, and other areas charged with fostering innovation in logistics and supply chain management. Koch has been selected to serve as the Chair of the Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel beginning in January 2024. Prior to this assignment, Koch previously served as the Deputy Executive Director of Mission Support (J32) in HQ DLA’s Logistics Operations (J3). Mission Support Directorate encompassed the Joint Contingency Acquisition Support Office and the Performance Based Logistics office. He was responsible for early engagements with Major Defense Acquisition Programs and DLA’s support to the Joint Strike Fighter program.

Koch is a graduate of the United States Air Force Academy and received a commission in 1989. He earned his first Master’s degree in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the University of Nebraska (1997), his second Masters in Logistics Management from the Air Force Institute of Technology (2004), and a third Master’s degree in National Resource Strategy from the Industrial College of the Armed Forces (2008). Prior to his assignment at DLA, he served on the Air Staff as the Strategic Initiatives Branch Chief, where he was responsible for managing the Air Force Maintenance Strategy (AF Maintenance for the 21st Century) and led the Air Force’s Repair Network Integration Initiative. This initiative completely transformed the Air Force’s approach to off-equipment maintenance and streamlined valuable maintenance resources. Koch retired from the Air Force in 2012 after 23 years of active duty service, attaining the rank of Colonel and served in a variety of positions in maintenance and logistics at the squadron, major command, and Headquarters Air Force levels.

Koch is married to his wife, Dawne, and they have three adult children.
2016-1677.

#### In re L.J.W.

Ashland App. No. 16 COA 013, 2016-Ohio-7054.
No. 92-1331.

#### Pollen v. United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 09-1481.

#### Cynthia Brzak, et al., Petitioners v. The United Nations, et al.

562 U.S. 948, 131 S. Ct. 151,

178 L. Ed. 2d 243,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7796.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 597 F.3d 107.
#### L.R. et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

[66 NYS3d 633]

In an action to recover damages for personal damages, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Genovesi, J.), dated September 9, 2016, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

On May 6, 2013, the then four-year-old infant plaintiff sustained injuries in her pre-kindergarten classroom when she tripped on the foot of a chair as she was carrying her food tray to a trash bin. As a result, the infant plaintiff, and her mother *664suing derivatively, commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries against the City of New York, the New York City Board of Education, and the New York City Department of Education. The Supreme Court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the defendants appeal.

“Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision” *(Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d 44, 49 [1994]; *see Santos v City of New York,*138 AD3d 968 [2016]). “Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students” *(Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d at 49; *see Nash v Port Wash. Union Free School Dist.,*83 AD3d 136, 146 [2011]).

Here, the defendants made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that the level of supervision afforded to the infant plaintiff was adequate *(see Simonides v Eastchester Union Free Sch. Dist.,*140 AD3d 728, 730 [2016]; *O’Brien v Sayville Union Free School Dist.,*87 AD3d 569 [2011]; *Paragas v Comsewogue Union Free School Dist.,*65 AD3d 1111, 1111-1112 [2009]). Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, at the time of the accident, the infant plaintiff was in the midst of executing an age-appropriate task which she and her classmates had performed every single school day since the start of the 2012/2013 academic year *(see Paragas v Comsewogue Union Free School Dist.,*65 AD3d at 1111-1112). Additionally, the mother’s affidavit, which contradicted her own 50-h hearing testimony and the infant plaintiff’s deposition testimony, was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Hall, J.P., Cohen, Barros and Christopher, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: [63 FR 32273, June 
12, 1998].

STATUS: Closed Meeting.

PLACE: 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

DATE PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED: June 12, 1998.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: Correction.
    The Commission considered the following item at a closed meeting 
held on Tuesday, June 16, 1998, at 10:00 a.m. The item was 
inadvertently omitted from the notice announced in the Federal Register 
on June 12, 1998 (63 FR 32273).
    Post argument discussion.
    Commissioner Unger, as duty officer, determined that Commission 
business required the above change and that no earlier notice thereof 
was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: June 16, 1998.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16345 Filed 6-16-98; 11:46 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
No. 10-6831.

#### Otis Lee Stitt, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1035, 131 S. Ct. 580,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8751.

178 L. Ed. 2d 423,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 253.
# DLA ready to ship COVID-19 vaccine to overseas locations, Navy fleet

/ Published Dec. 15, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
With the first FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine in the arms of some healthcare workers, the Defense Logistics Agency is ready to ship doses for Defense Department employees outside the continental U.S. and the deployed U.S. Navy Fleet.DLA has spent months working with Operation Warp Speed and Defense Health Agency officials to refine its plan for delivering the vaccine as it becomes available from manufacturers. The agency already has well-defined cold-chain management practices and has delivered the annual flu vaccine for 20 years.“In some aspects, storage and distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine is pretty similar to what we’ve been doing all along with the flu vaccine, and DLA has had great success getting that to DOD employees around the world,” said Army Col. Anthony Bostick, who leads DLA’s OWS operational planning team.The agency has increased refrigerated storage space and can maintain almost 19 million doses of the 2 to 8 degree Celsius vaccine and 4.6 million of the minus 20 degree Celsius vaccine ahead of shipping products to customers. The agency hasn’t been asked to distribute the -80 degree Celsius vaccine but has developed initial plans to provide support if necessary, Bostick added.DLA Distribution manages six U.S.-based and four overseas centers capable of handling cold-chain items and began training additional employees in cold-chain management processes in June, said Bob Garrettson of DLA Distribution’s special commodities team.“We’ve been involved in very detailed, intense planning with DHA and other key players to make sure there’s a coordinated response that gets the vaccine exactly where it’s needed, and we have contingency plans in place in case they’re needed,” he said.Dana Dallas, DLA Troop Support’s cold chain program manager, helps create policy for managing temperature-sensitive medical material throughout DOD. She works with DLA Distribution to establish packaging and handling procedures that follow manufacturer guidelines.“We have temperature-monitoring devices in all of our cold-chain shipments, so we can do quality analysis for any incidences on cold-chain material during either distribution or post-receipt, such as refrigerator malfunctions,” she said.Shipments from U.S.-based center typically remain cold for up to five days, Garrettson added. Many shipments destined for overseas customers will be cross-docked at other DLA Distribution centers where material handlers will refresh packaging components to maintain cold temperatures. The agency is also coordinating with customers to ensure they’re available to receive the vaccine upon arrival, Garrettson continued.DLA has been involved in the nation’s pandemic response since February and has provided over $2.5 billion in items ranging from face masks and ventilators to test kits.
No. 10-114.

#### Ricky D. Fox, Petitioner v. Billy Ray Vice, Chief of Police for the Town of Vinton, et al.

562 U.S. 1002, 131 S. Ct. 505,

178 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8502.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 423.
# Subsistence employees see field feeding outside their office

/ Published Oct. 1, 2015
PHILADELPHIA,
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 29 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM SHERBURN, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. 96-6236 ) (D.C. No. CIV-95-1836-R) RON WARD; ATTORNEY GENERAL ) (W.D. Oklahoma) OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ) ) Respondents-Appellees. )

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON , LOGANand MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

This matter is before the court on petitioner William Sherburn’s application for a certificate of appealability (formerly a certificate of probable cause). His right to appeal the federal district court’s denial of habeas corpus relief is conditioned upon this court granting a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The law, as recently amended, instructs that we may issue such a certificate “only if the applicant has made a substantial2

showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” and we “indicate which specific issue or issues satisfy [that] showing.” Id. § 2253(c)(2) and (3). Petitioner asserted in his habeas corpus petition numerous grounds for relief from his state court conviction for attempting to obtain merchandise by false pretenses for which he received a twenty-year sentence.

The Petitioner raise[d] the following eight grounds for relief: (1) Violation of his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by allowing him to be “paraded” before the jury in leg shackles; (2) Prosecutorial misconduct; (3) Improper admission of evidence of prior convictions; (4) Improper use of prior convictions which contained a name discrepancy; (5) Error in refusing to permit him to attack the admission of his prior convictions; (6) Error in admitting evidence of a crime with which he was not properly charged; (7) Improperly charging him under a general statute; (8) Error in submitting a flight instruction. I R. doc. 26. After the magistrate judge recommended the petition be dismissed, petitioner filed objections. We have considered the arguments in petitioner’s brief and examined the record, including the transcript of the trial. The magistrate judge and the district court correctly analyzed the facts and law in the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations of February 28, 1996, and the district court’s memorandum opinion and order of June 26, 1996. We conclude that petitioner has failed to make the necessary showing to warrant our issuance of a certificate of appealability. Therefore, we deny his application and DISMISS the appeal. The mandate shall issue forthwith.3 Entered for the Court James K. Logan Circuit Judge
2017-0115.

#### State v. Bonnell.

Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-87-223820-ZA. On appellee’s motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.
# Distribution leadership hosts DLA Command Sergeant Major

/ Published Jan. 27, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 

Defense Logistics Agency Senior Enlisted Leader Army Command Sgt. Maj. Charles Tobin along with USTRANSCOM Command Sgt. Maj. William Turner and Army Sgt. Maj. Rodger Mansker visited DLA Distribution on Jan. 20 to learn how the organization performs storage and distribution functions for the military services and other key customers.
Starting with an office call with Distribution commander Army Brig. Gen. Richard B. Dix, they met with key Distribution staff to receive an organizational overview highlighting DLA Distribution’s 24 distribution centers worldwide as well as its expeditionary team.  
“I am excited to be here, especially with Transcom, the backbone of our organization,” said Tobin. 

Following the briefing, the group toured DLA Distribution Susquehanna’s Eastern Distribution Center, the largest in DoD, to witness storage and distribution in motion.  They then toured the hazmat facility and paid a visit to DLA’s only Airborne Riggers at Distribution Susquehanna’s Aerial Delivery and Textile operation.  

“The visit to Susquehanna was an eye-opener for Sgt. Maj. Turner and Sgt. Maj. Mansker,” explained Tobin. “They both acknowledged the value and role of our Parachute Riggers and the importance of our relationship between TRANSCOM and the Services. They were both blown away with the attitude and positive command climate within our workforce. Well done and kudos to the Distribution leadership.”