alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arlin Ruiz, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 874]

Appeal by the defendant *563from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mattel, J.), dated May 15, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his application for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. The mitigating factors that the defendant identified either were adequately taken into account by the Sex Offender Registration Act Guidelines or did not warrant a downward departure from the presumptive risk level *(see People v*Kaff, 149 AD3d 783 [2017]; *People v Rose,*146 AD3d 911, 912 [2017]; *People v Ibarra,*137 AD3d 1097, 1098 [2016]).

Leventhal, J.R, Hall, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Craig J. Cerny, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harrington West FinancialGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: August 10, 2007                                                /s/ Craig J. Cerny   Craig J. Cerny,   Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

The undersigned officerof Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to hisknowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which thiscertification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. Inaccordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification(A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theExchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and(B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filingunder the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that theCompany specifically incorporates it by reference.
| Date: August 9,  2006 | /s/ Mark T. Frost                            |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                  | Name: Mark T. Frost                          |
|                  | Title: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
exv10w03



 





Exhibit 10.03




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED

ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. 1991 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective February 5, 2004)



     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (“Amendment”), made and entered into on December 6,
2004, by ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Employer”).



R E C I T A L S:




     1. The Employer maintains the Amended and Restated Allied Waste
Industries, Inc. 1991 Incentive Stock Plan (“Plan”), as amended and restated
effective February 5, 2004;



     2. The Employer has reserved the right to amend the Plan in whole or in
part; and



     3. The Employer intends to amend the Plan.



     THEREFORE, the Employer hereby adopts this Amendment, as follows:



     1. Section 6(e) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the
following paragraph at the beginning of Section 6(e), preceding
Sections 6(e)(i)-(v):



          “Except as otherwise determined by the Committee and as otherwise
set forth in the agreement evidencing the Options or in an employment or
any other written agreement with the Company:”



     2. The first two sentences in the third paragraph of Section 7(a) of
the Plan are hereby amended in their entirety to read as follows:




	 	 	“A Participant who is eligible to participate in any
nonqualified deferred compensation plan of the Company
which is currently in effect or subsequently adopted
by the Company (separately and collectively, “Deferred
Compensation Plan”) may elect to defer the Issue
Date(s) for one or more units of Restricted Stock.
The Participant’s election must be made, in writing,
in accordance with the terms of the Deferred
Compensation Plan.”





     3. The Effective Date of this Amendment shall be December 6,
2004.



     4. Except as provided in this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions
of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.



 









 





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC., a

  Delaware corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By	 	 
	

	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	Steven M. Helm, Executive Vice President

and General Counsel








2
EXHIBIT 32.1certification pursuant to 18 u.s.c. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of thesarbanes-oxley act of 2002The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to my knowledgethat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification isprovided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or “filed” for anypurpose whatsoever.                  Date: August 14, 2006   Name: /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton                 Sheldon C. Fenton        Title: Chief Executive Officer  
22
No. 10-6719.

#### Eric Curtis Chapman, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 543,

178 L. Ed. 2d 399,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8350.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 614 F.3d 810.
No. D-2564.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Sandra L. Craig.

562 U.S. 817, 131 S. Ct. 410,

178 L. Ed. 2d 274,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7506.

October 4, 2010.

Sandra L. Craig, of Pacific, Missouri, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
EXHIBIT 31.1
        CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                 DISCLOSURE IN THE REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT



I, Gary C. Granoff, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer of Ameritrans Capital Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ameritrans Capital
Corporation (the "report");

2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the report
(evaluation date); and

(c) Presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the evaluation
date.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data; and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in the report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weakness. Dated: May 14, 2004



                       /s/ GARY C. GRANOFF
                       --------------------------------------
                       GARY C. GRANOFF
                       PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
No. 10-5872.

#### Paul Anthony Smith, Petitioner v. Gary Conder, et al.

562 U.S. 982, 131 S. Ct. 416,

178 L. Ed. 2d 325,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8139.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# Oklahoma City’s Lemons awarded Global Distribution Excellence: Systems Analyst Civilian of the Year

/ Published July 23, 2015
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, 
Sherita Lemons, supply systems analyst with Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Oklahoma City, Okla., has been awarded the Global Distribution Excellence: Systems Analyst Civilian of the Year for her customer support and contributions to audit readiness.

Lemons duties were to monitor the latest program change to the local supply requirements by running queries on the distribution system. Due to audit readiness, the supply office underwent a major change when the base operating supply system transferred to the Distribution Supply System. 

“The tact and diplomacy Ms. Lemons possesses has been the most valuable asset during this monumental change,” said DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, Okla., director Ned LaViolette.

Rather than sit at her desk running reports, Lemons wears protective personal equipment and operates from the center of the supply operation, saving the organization up to ten man hours weekly. By positioning herself within arm’s reach of the team, she is able to resolve issues within minutes. 

Additionally, Lemons helped the team recover approximately 20 stock numbers valued at over $100,000 when these packaging assets could not be stored in a non-controlled area.

An expert in DSS, Lemons has also taken on the task of learning the government purchase card program. By involving herself in all parts of the supply system, Lemons has helped alleviate confusion between the cardholder, requestors, vendors and billing and approving officials.

“The team is now super-efficient and can handle all requests, working as a well-oiled machine,” said LaViolette. “Ms. Lemons is the reason for this. She has a calming effect on the supply team and is extremely easy to talk to.”
EX-32

   SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF JAMES H. ALEXANDER AND DANNIE SHAVER

                      SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Everlert, Inc.
("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated: June 8, 2004                    By: /s/ James H. Alexander
                                       James H. Alexander, President



Dated: June 8, 2004                    By: /s/ Dannie Shaver
                                       Dannie Shaver, Secretary/Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

                               ABERCROMBIE & FITCH

                                   STOCK AWARD
                             STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
                           ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT

This Stock Option Agreement is entered into by and between Abercrombie & Fitch
(the "Company"), and the Director of the Company whose name appears below (the
"Director") in order to set forth the terms and conditions of Options granted to
the Director under The Abercrombie & Fitch 1996 Stock Plan for Non-Associate
Directors (1998 Restatement, as amended) (The "Plan").

           DIRECTOR'S NAME:

           SOCIAL SECURITY #:

           ADDRESS:

           # OPTIONS:

           DATE OF GRANT:

           GRANT PRICE:

           OPTION TYPE:                NON-QUALIFIED

           VESTING:                    Shares vest over four years
                                       25% / 25% / 25% / 25%

Subject to the attached Terms and Conditions and the terms of the Plan, which
are incorporated herein by reference, the Company hereby grants to the Director
Options to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Company, as outlined above.

The Company and the Director have executed this Agreement as of the Date of
Grant set forth above.

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH                        DIRECTOR

_____________________________________      _____________________________________
Michael Jeffries, Chairman and Chief
 Executive Officer
# C_2013226EN.01000701.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 7 June 2013 — Claudiu Roșu v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a Județului Sibiu — Activitatea de Inspecție Fiscală

(Case C-312/13)

(2013/C 226/11)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Claudiu Roșu

Applicant:

Defendant: Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a Județului Sibiu — Activitatea de Inspecție Fiscală

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

If a vendor has been reclassified as a taxable person for VAT purposes and the consideration for (price of) the supply of the immovable property has been determined by the parties, without any reference to VAT, must Articles 73 and 78 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that the taxable amount is:

1

| (a) | the consideration for (price of) the supply of the property determined by the parties, less the rate of VAT, or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the consideration for (price of) the supply of the property determined by the parties, less the rate of VAT, or

| (b) | the consideration for (price of) the supply of the property agreed by the parties? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the consideration for (price of) the supply of the property agreed by the parties?

---

(1)  Council Directive of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
No. 10-5211.

#### Jason Loadholt, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

562 U.S. 956, 131 S. Ct. 459,

178 L. Ed. 2d 282,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8076.

October 12, 2010.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for further consideration in light of McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 742, 130 S. Ct. 3020, 177 L. Ed. 2d 894 (2010).

Same case below, 456 Mass. 411, 923 N.E.2d 1037.
# Former San Joaquin deputy to be inducted into DLA Hall of Fame

/ Published July 15, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
David C. Ennis, former deputy commander at DLA Distribution San Joaquin, Calif., will be one of the newest inductees to the DLA Hall of Fame in honor of his 39 years of exceptional service.

Ennis’ career with the Defense Logistics Agency began on the warehouse floor as a laborer, and later included work in the areas of planning, productivity and financial management.  He worked his way to high-level positions within the distribution center including director of Administrative Service Center West, director of Mission Operations and, finally, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, Calif., deputy commander.

In 1984, he was named one of the 10 Outstanding DLA Personnel and received the DLA Meritorious Civilian Service Award in 1991 and 2001, the second highest civilian award in DLA.

The induction ceremony will be held 10:30 a.m. Sept. 20, at the DLA McNamara Headquarters Complex auditorium.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)

I,
Steven J. Janusek, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation (collectively, "registrant");

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
May 5, 2011

/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek, Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
No. 10-6502.

#### Jerome Howell, Petitioner v. Philip Heath, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 1049, 131 S. Ct. 608,

178 L. Ed. 2d 443,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8972.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# C_2014052EN.01002402.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timișoara (Romania) lodged on 3 June 2013 — Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură (APIA) — Centrul Județean Timiș v Curtea de Conturi a României, Camera de Conturi a Județului Timiș

(Case C-304/13)

2014/C 52/43

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Timișoara

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură (APIA) — Centrul Județean Timiș

Appellant:

Respondents: Curtea de Conturi a României, Camera de Conturi a Județului Timiș

Respondents:

Intervener: Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură (APIA)

Intervener:

Question referred

Question referred

Do the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003, (1) in particular Articles 115 and 135 thereof, preclude a State from making the grant of a premium to a farmer subject to additional conditions, which are not laid down in that regulation, namely the condition that the farmer must ‘have no debts due in respect of the State budget and/or the local budget at the date of application for the premium’?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 (OJ 2003 L 270, p. 1).

1

---