alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Panangeksamen ken Panangagas 

iti Saan nga Aktibo a Sarut (TB)

Agpatingga iti 13 a milion a tattao iti Estados Unidos ti mabalin nga addaan iti saan 

nga aktibo a TB (maawagan met kas latent nga impeksion ti TB). No awan ti 

panagagas, 1 kadagiti 10 a tattao nga addaan iti saan nga aktibo a TB ti agsakitto iti 

aktibo a sakit a TB, ken maiwarasda ti TB iti dadduma babaen iti angin. 

Makatulongka a manglapped iti panagwaras ti TB.

Tapno maammuan ti ad-adu pay maipapan iti TB ken no kasanom a saluadan 

ta bagim ken ti dadduma, bisitaen ti www.cdc.gov/thinktesttreattb

Ti panangagas iti saan nga aktibo a TB ti 

kasayaatan a wagas tapno masaluadanka 

manipud iti aktibo a sakit a TB. No 

mabalin, irekomendar ti CDC ti 

panagusar iti apagbiit ken nanam-ay 

a 3 wenno 4 a bulan a panagagas 

iti rifamycin para iti saan nga 

aktibo a TB.

Uray dagiti tattao a nakaawat iti bakuna iti TB, a 

maaw-awagan met kas bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) a 

bakuna, ket nasken a maeksamen gapu ta kumapsut ti 

bakuna iti panaglabas ti tiempo.

Kapatangmo ti mangipapaay ti pannaripato ti salun-atmo maipanggep 

iti panagpaeksamen no sika ket:

agtrab-trabaho kadagiti luglugar nga 

addaan iti nangato a panagiinnakar ti 

TB, kas kadagiti ospital, pagdagusan 

dagiti awan pagtaenganna, pasilidad ti 

pagbaludan, ken dagiti balay 

ti taripato

agnanaed wenno nagnaed 

idi kadagiti situasion a 

pakasarakan ti dadakkel a 

grupo no sadino a 

kadawyan ti kaso ti TB, 

kas kadagiti pagdagusan 

dagiti awan 

pagtaenganna, preso, 

wenno karsel

nakapsut ti resistensia 

ti bagi gapu iti 

sumagmamano nga 

ag-agas wenno 

kondision ti salun-at 

kas iti diabetes, kanser, 

ken HIV

nakilangen iti nabiit 

pay a tiempo iti maysa 

a tao nga addaan iti 

sakit nga aktibo a TB

naiyanak kadagiti 

wenno masansan a 

mapan kadagiti 

pagilian no sadino a 

kadawyan ti kaso ti 

TB, agraman dagiti 

adda iti Asia, Africa 

ken Latin America

Panunoten Addanak kadi ti peggad para iti impeksion ti TB?

Eksamenen Agasan

Ania dagiti pagpiliak 

a panagagas?

Ania nga eksamen iti 

TB ti masapulko?

Adda dua a kita dagiti eksamen para 

iti impeksion ti TB: ti eksamen ti dara 

para iti TB ken ti eksamen ti kudil 

para iti TB. Ad-adu ti mayat kadagiti 

eksamen ti dara para iti TB kas wagas 

a pangeksamen iti TB para kadagiti 

tattao a nakaawat iti bakuna iti 

TB (BCG). Nasken a pagpatangan 

dagiti mangipapaay ti pannaripato ti salun-at ken 

dagiti pasiente no ania nga eksamen ti kasayaatan.

1

2 3

301128
No. 10-5434.

#### Louis Winters, Petitioner v. Scott P. Fisher, Warden.

562 U.S. 921, 131 S. Ct. 296,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7158.

178 L. Ed. 2d 194,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5917.

#### Nanette Laurence, Petitioner v. Gateway Health System.

562 U.S. 983, 131 S. Ct. 418,

178 L. Ed. 2d 326,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8304.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 668.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesus Carlos Gutierrez, Appellant.

[67 NYS3d 455]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Anthony Ferrara, J.), rendered August 26, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Kapnick, Kahn, Kern, JJ.
#### Lori A. Mangione et al., Appellants, v Christine Bua, Respondent.

[48 NYS3d 518]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Giacomo, J.), dated July 6, 2015, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Lori A. Mangione did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

The defendant failed to meet her prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff Lori A. Mangione (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendant failed to submit competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the injured plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury to the cervical and lumbar regions of her spine under either the permanent consequential limitation of use or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), as the defendant’s experts found significant limitations in the range of motion in those regions of her spine *(see Mercado v Mendoza,*133 AD3d 833, 834 [2015]; *Miller v Bratsilova,*118 AD3d 761 [2014]). Since the defendant failed to meet her prima facie burden, it is unnecessary to determine whether the papers submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; *Che Hong Kim v Kossoff,*90 AD3d 969 [2011]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Mastro, J.R, LaSalle, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                         REGISTRANT'S LETTER TO THE SEC

      In response to the SEC's issuance of Temporary Final Rule and Final Rule:
Requirements for Arthur Andersen LLP Auditing Clients, which was effective March
18, 2002, and in compliance with Temporary Note 3T we hereby include the
following:


May 16, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20549

To Whom It May Concern:

Arthur Andersen LLP, as our independent public accountants, has represented to
us that:

The audit of our financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2001 was
subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate
continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit, and availability of
national office consultation. Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of
Arthur Andersen is not relevant to this audit.


/s/ DREXLER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION


                                       52
No. 09-11449.

#### Aaron Castro, Petitioner v. Brian Williams, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 881, 131 S. Ct. 201,

178 L. Ed. 2d 121,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6769.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-6313.

#### Chung Kao, Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, San Bernardino County, et al.

562 U.S. 1032, 131 S. Ct. 572,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8700.

178 L. Ed. 2d 419,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, denied.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Humphreys, McCullough and Retir ed Judge Hodges 

MISCHELLE BROWN-MAYO MEMORANDUM OPINION  v. Record No. 1084-13-2 PER CURIAM OCTOBER 8, 2013 COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKER S’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Mischelle Brown-Mayo, pro se , on brief). (David W. Robinson, Senior As sistant County Atto rney, on brief), for appellee.

Mischelle Brown-Mayo (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission affirming the termination of an awar d of wage loss benefits on the ground that claimant’s current disability is unrelated to th e compensable accident. Claimant contends the commission erred by (1) discounting the opinion of her treating physician, (2) giving “undue weight to the ‘objective findings ,’” (3) concluding the record demonstrated she was receiving treatment for back pain shortly before her comp ensable accident, and (4) failing to “take into consideration” her testimony desc ribing her symptoms and injury.

We have reviewed the record and the commi ssion’s opinion and find th at this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for th e reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Brown-Mayo v. Chesterfield Cnty., JCN VA00000218265 (May 23, 2013). We

 Retired Judge Hodges took part in the consid eration of this case by designation pursuant to Code § 17.1-400(D).

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designa ted for publication.UNPUBLISHED- 2 - dispense with oral argument and summarily affi rm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th e Court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.
No. 10-299.

#### Yumin Zhao, Petitioner v. Lone Star Engine Installation Center, Inc.

562 U.S. 1004, 131 S. Ct. 520,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8593,

178 L. Ed. 2d 373,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, denied.
No. 10-6715.

#### Gary Wayne Warner, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 1070, 131 S. Ct. 661,

178 L. Ed. 2d 493,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9081.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
EXHIBIT 32.3

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duquesne Light Company (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Morgan K. OBrien, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge:



| | (5) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (6) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WITNESS the due execution hereof this 1st day of March, 2007.



/s/ Morgan K. OBrienMorgan K. OBrienPresident and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be
retained by Duquesne Light Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended August 1, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter S. Teshima, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
for the periods presented therein.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    PETER S.
TESHIMAPeter S. TeshimaCorporate Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 9, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CAO
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMERIGROUP Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Jeffrey L. McWaters, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies to the best of his knowledge, and Kathleen K. Toth, as Chief
Accounting Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, hereby
certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. /s/ Jeffrey L. McWatersJeffrey L. McWatersChairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    August 4, 2004
 /s/ Kathleen K. TothKathleen K. TothExecutive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer(principal financial officer)Date:
    
    August 4, 2004
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# DSCR's Bellwood Elk thrive during pandemic thanks to great care

/ Published April 14, 2021
Richmond, Va., 
This past year has taught us how important it is to take care of ourselves and stay healthy. The same is true with our Bellwood elk herd on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. 

On March 25, David Gartz, a wildlife biologist for Virginia’s Department of Wildlife Resources, gave our elk, and their three pastures an in-depth look-over and inspection. He was particularly interested in the appearance and maintenance of the pastures, the care provided to the elk and the overall well-being of the herd. 

“These visits happen once each year,” said Fred Fennell, an equipment maintenance supervisor with Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond, the organization responsible for the elk. 

“DSCR is the only [Defense Department] installation to have regulatory permits to exhibit elk,” added Fennell, “so we take our management and care responsibilities very seriously. Plus, we know how important the elk are to the history of the installation.”  

 The results of the inspection were all positive. All of the animals are healthy and doing well due to the continued stellar care and upkeep from DLA Installation Management Richmond team members. 

Adhering to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s COVID-19 safety guidelines, many installation management employees continued to come to work on DSCR each day to take care of the installation, its employees and the elk. Their care of the herd continued throughout the year just as it did prior to the pandemic. The elk ate very well during the colder months, enjoying a combination of hay, corn, deer food and vitamins. Once growing season returns, their diet will be supplemented with fresh alfalfa and lemongrass. 

“Our elk are part of the DSCR family,” said Jimmy Parrish, chief of the installation’s Environmental Management Division. “Nearly 80 years ago the War Department made a promise to the Bellwood family that we would take care of their elk. Continuing that care now is just the right thing to do.”

The installation’s elk herd size is currently 24, with eight males and sixteen females.  These numbers include the three calves that were born last year. In addition to the visit by DWR, the elk are also visited yearly by a large-game veterinarian, who gives the herd a much more thorough medical check-up, and places identification tags on the ears of the recently born.

For more information on the history of the Bellwood Elk visit the Bellwood Elk history page.
Form of Note



 Exhibit 4.2 
  
 FORM OF SERIES A SECURITY 
  
 “THIS SECURITY (OR ITS PREDECESSOR) HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES
ACT”), AND, ACCORDINGLY, MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED WITHIN THE UNITED STATES OR TO, OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OR BENEFIT OF, U.S. PERSONS, EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN THE NEXT SENTENCE. BY ITS ACQUISITION HEREOF OR OF A
BENEFICIAL INTEREST HEREIN, THE HOLDER: 
  
 (1)
REPRESENTS THAT (A) IT IS A “QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYER” (AS DEFINED IN RULE 144A UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT) (A “QIB”), OR (B) IT IS ACQUIRING THIS SECURITY IN AN OFFSHORE TRANSACTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION S UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT; 
  
 (2) AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT
RESELL OR OTHERWISE TRANSFER THIS SECURITY EXCEPT (A) TO THE COMPANY OR ANY OF ITS SUBSIDIARIES, (B) TO A PERSON WHOM THE SELLER REASONABLY BELIEVES IS A QIB PURCHASING FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OF A QIB IN A TRANSACTION MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 144A, (C) IN AN OFFSHORE TRANSACTION MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 903 OR 904 OF REGULATION S UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, (D) IN A TRANSACTION MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 144 UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, (E) TO AN
INSTITUTIONAL “ACCREDITED INVESTOR” (AS DEFINED IN RULE 501(A)(1), (2), (3) OR (7) OF REGULATION D UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT) THAT, PRIOR TO SUCH TRANSFER, FURNISHES THE TRUSTEE A SIGNED LETTER CONTAINING CERTAIN REPRESENTATIONS AND
AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE TRANSFER OF THIS SECURITY (THE FORM OF WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE TRUSTEE) AND, IF SUCH TRANSFER IS IN RESPECT OF AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF SECURITIES LESS THAN $250,000, AN OPINION OF COUNSEL ACCEPTABLE TO THE
COMPANY, IF THE COMPANY SO REQUESTS, THAT SUCH TRANSFER IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SECURITIES ACT, (F) IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANOTHER EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT (AND BASED UPON AN OPINION OF COUNSEL ACCEPTABLE TO
THE COMPANY), OR (G) PURSUANT TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND, IN EACH CASE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE JURISDICTION; AND

  
 (3) AGREES THAT IT WILL DELIVER TO EACH
PERSON TO WHOM THIS SECURITY OR AN INTEREST HEREIN IS TRANSFERRED A NOTICE SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE EFFECT OF THIS LEGEND. 
  
 AS USED HEREIN, THE TERMS “OFFSHORE TRANSACTION” AND “UNITED STATES” HAVE THE MEANINGS GIVEN TO THEM BY RULE 902 OF REGULATION S UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT. THE INDENTURE GOVERNING THIS SECURITY CONTAINS A PROVISION REQUIRING THE TRUSTEE TO REFUSE TO REGISTER ANY TRANSFER OF THIS SECURITY IN VIOLATION OF THE FOREGOING.”
2017-0746.

#### Clark v. Adult Parole Auth.

Miscellaneous case. On respondents’ motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
No. 10-6027.

#### Michael A. Nelson, Petitioner v. Harris, N.A., et al.

562 U.S. 1007, 131 S. Ct. 510,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8461.

178 L. Ed. 2d 378,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-6375.

#### Lorenzo Stephens, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 975, 131 S. Ct. 494,

178 L. Ed. 2d 313,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7910.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 282.
No. 10-6245.

#### Edward J. Robinson, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1013, 131 S. Ct. 528,

178 L. Ed. 2d 389,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8492.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                               PIERRE FOODS, INC.

         Pursuant to N.C.G.S. Section 55-10-06 of the General Statutes of North
Carolina, the undersigned Corporation hereby submits the following Articles of
Amendment for the purpose of amending its Articles of Incorporation.

         1. Name. The name of the Corporation is Pierre Foods, Inc.

         2. Amendment. The following amendment to the Articles of the
corporation was adopted by its directors and shareholders on the 18th day of
September, 2002, in the manner prescribed by law:

                  RESOLVED, that the Restated Articles of Incorporation of
                  Pierre Foods, Inc. filed with the Secretary of State on August
                  5, 2002 be amended by the addition of the following new
                  Article.

                  6. Action Without Meeting. To the full extent then permitted
                  by the North Carolina Business Corporation Act as it may be
                  amended from time to time, any action required or permitted to
                  be taken at a meeting may be taken without a meeting and
                  without prior notice by shareholders having not less than the
                  minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take the
                  action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote
                  were present and voted.

         4. Date of Adoption. The date of adoption of the amendment was
September 18, 2002.

         5. Shareholder Approval. The amendment was approved by shareholder
action as required in accordance with Chapter 55 of the North Carolina General
Statutes.

         6. Effective Date. These articles will be effective upon filing.

         This the 18th day of September, 2002.

                                               PIERRE FOODS, INC.

                                               By: /s/ David R. Clark
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   David R. Clark, Vice-Chairman