alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Yokosuka distribution center hosts annual Forklift Rodeo and Safety Rally

/ Published Oct. 26, 2015
YOKOSUKA, Japan, 
On Oct. 9, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Yokosuka, Japan hosted their 10th annual Forklift Rodeo and Safety Rally, a five-event competition designed to test safe and efficient forklift operating skills. 
The Forklift Rodeo showcased the operational skill of 41 drivers in eight teams, representing Navy Exchange Yokosuka, DLA Distribution Yokosuka Japan, and Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center Yokosuka A-61 Shop.  The drivers participated in events including “Soft Touch,” “Honest Officer, I Wasn’t Speeding,” “Having a Ball,” Shoot the Bull,” and “The Square Dance.”

The competition was fierce this year with the NEX Team 1 taking third place, FLCY A-61 Shop taking second, and DLA Distribution Yokosuka’s Transportation Division taking first place. The Best Individual Performance Award went to Yoshitaka Nakamura from the FLCY A-61 Shop.

The Safety Rally was strongly supported by the Commander Naval Forces Japan Regional Fire Department with its fire engine display, smoke-filled room simulator, and an 8.0 magnitude earthquake simulator. The smoke-filled room simulator reinforced previous training on the proper way to egress a burning building, and the earthquake simulator demonstrated the power of a major earthquake.

The Safety Rally also included information on bicycle safety from the Commander Fleet Activities Yokosuka Safety Office, and refresher safety training for forklift operations from Sumitomo Nacco Forklift Company.

The Forklift Rodeo has evolved from its start in 2006 as a DLA Distribution Yokosuka internal event.  Partner commands joined in 2008, and the Safety Rally was added in 2011.  Rodeo events were modified in 2014 to increase the emphasis on safe and precise handling.
2017-0678.

#### State v. D.F.

Montgomery App. No. 27032, 2017-Ohio-2882. On appellant’s application for dismissal. Application granted. Cause dismissed.
EXHIBIT 4.2

                                  AMENDMENT TO
             CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF PREFERENCES AND RIGHTS OF
                      SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
                                       OF
                     INTERNATIONAL CARD ESTABLISHMENT, INC.
                             a Delaware corporation

         The undersigned, Jonathan Severn and William J. Lopshire, certify that:

They are the duly acting President and Secretary, respectively, of International
Card Establishment, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the
Corporation Code of the State of Delaware (the "CORPORATION").

Pursuant to authority conferred upon the Board of Directors by the Certificate
of Incorporation of the Corporation, and pursuant to the provisions of
Corporations Code of the State of Delaware, said Board of Directors, pursuant to
a meeting held on December 1, 2004, adopted a resolution amending the
Certificate of Designations of Preferences and Rights of the Corporation's
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, as follows:

         (a) 1. Section (b) Authorized Shares is deleted in its entirety and the
following is inserted: "(b) Authorized Shares. The number of authorized shares
constituting the Series A Preferred Stock shall be sixty-two thousand (62,000)
shares of such series."

         2. The definition of Floor Price in Section (f)(iii) is amended such
that the Floor Price shall equal $0.375 per share.

         3. In all other respects the Certificate of Designations shall remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.

         4. The undersigned represent and warrant that approval of the
shareholders of International Card Establishment, Inc., is not required for this
Amendment.

Each of the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury that the matters set
out in the foregoing Certificate are true of his own knowledge. Executed at
Oxnard, California, on this 6th day of December, 2004.



                                            _______________________________
                                            Name:    Jonathan Severn
                                            Title:   President


                                            _______________________________
                                            Name:    William J. Lopshire
                                            Title:   Secretary



                                      -1-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          64,904
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,764
<INVENTORY>                                     48,882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               200,597
<PP&E>                                          68,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 288,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,806
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,721
<OTHER-SE>                                     198,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   288,130
<SALES>                                        472,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               472,948
<CGS>                                          157,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               199,140
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 70,807
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,031
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,776
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,776
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.40
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of James Joseph Becker, an Attorney.

[55 NYS3d 675]—

Per Curiam.

James Joseph Becker was admitted to practice by this Court in 2012 and lists a business address in Williston, Vermont with the Office of Court Administration. Becker has *948applied to this Court, by affidavit sworn to April 28, 2017, for leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons *(see*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application, contending that he is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation because he has failed to fulfill his attorney registration requirements for the 2014 and 2016 biennial periods *(see*Judiciary Law § 468-a; *Matter of Bretschger,*148 AD3d 1450, 1451 [2017]; *Matter of Bomba,*146 AD3d 1226, 1226-1227 [2017]; Rules of Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1).

In reply to AGC’s opposition, however, Becker has submitted a supplemental affidavit, sworn to June 27, 2017, in which he attests that he is now current in his New York attorney registration requirements. Furthermore, Office of Court Administration records likewise establish that Becker has duly registered and cured any preexisting registration delinquency. Accordingly, with AGC voicing no other substantive objection to his application, and having determined that Becker is now eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons *(see Matter of Kushner,*151 AD3d 1268, 1269 [2017]; *Matter of Waldron,*150 AD3d 1542 [2017]), we grant the application and accept his resignation.

McCarthy, J.R, Garry, Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that James Joseph Becker’s application for permission to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further ordered that James Joseph Becker’s name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court *(see generally*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]); and it is further ordered that, effective immediately, James Joseph Becker is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Becker is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further ordered that James Joseph Becker shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him.
No. 10-6545.

#### LaVern Berryhill, Petitioner v. Ronald A. White, Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.

562 U.S. 1106, 131 S. Ct. 849,

178 L. Ed. 2d 554,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9631.

December 13, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
#### People v Baez

App Term, 1st Dept: 54 Misc 3d 134(A) (NY)

denied 3/27/17 (Stein, J.)
No. 10-391.

#### Xiu Feng Li, Petitioner v. Douglas Hock and SMP Inc.

562 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 576,

178 L. Ed. 2d 415,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8771.

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 171.
No. D-2558.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Thomas Daniel Brown.

562 U.S. 816, 131 S. Ct. 408,

178 L. Ed. 2d 273,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7550.

October 4, 2010.

Thomas Daniel Brown, of Charlotte, North Carolina, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
# Oklahoma City recognized with Global Distribution Excellence: MG Kenneth L. Privratsky Award for Distribution Center Excellence 

/ Published Aug. 27, 2015
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Oklahoma City, Okla., has been awarded the Global Distribution Excellence: MG Kenneth L. Privratsky Award for Distribution Center Excellence for its support to DLA Distribution’s mission, effective and efficient use of resources and quality working conditions.

The team improved customer support by reducing Z to A time from approximately three days to two days, a 32 percent reduction. Z to A time measures the time that elapses between when an Air Force craftsman repairs a component, and DLA processes a receipt, which updates the serviceable balance within the Distribution Standard System. 

“Our team exceeded our on-time delivery goal of 85 percent by more than four percent,” said DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, Okla., director Ned LaViolette. “Additionally we exceeded the 24 hour goal by 25 percent.”

Utilizing good stewardship the team avoided a loss of $800,000 by salvaging and reutilizing 42 percent of the tools the Air Force was turning into DLA Disposition. By deploying 16 additional tool boxes of reutilized tools throughout the packing branch, they were able to increase the operational workstations by 40 percent. This initiative resulted in a 20 percent increase in productivity.

By supporting DLA Director’s “clean the attic” initiative by picking over 13,000 disposal release orders, over 425,000 assets were shipped to disposal, generating over 12,500 cubic feet of space for reallocation. Fiscal responsibility was key in returning nearly seven percent of the allocated budget to DLA Distribution headquarters. 

“Our adherence to mission essential spending has helped save over $700,000 in labor costs,” said LaViolette.

In addition to the work focus, Oklahoma City takes community spirit and quality of life very seriously. The distribution center has provided free on-site cardiac risk profiles screenings for the employees. 

“By fostering positive and safe work environments, the 2014 culture climate score improved by 12 percent,” explained LaViolette.

The team embraced the Voluntary Protection Program, leading to a 40 percent drop in material handling equipment incidents. This directly contributed to a less than four percent total case incident rate, which is lower than the established VPP goal of almost six percent.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of VitalWorks Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Joseph M. Walsh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael A. Manto,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that to our knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                        /s/ Joseph M. Walsh                       March 27, 2003
                        ------------------------------------      --------------
                        Joseph M. Walsh                                     Date
                        Chief Executive Officer


                        /s/ Michael A. Manto                      March 27, 2003
                        ------------------------------------      --------------
                        Michael A. Manto                                    Date
                        Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to VitalWorks Inc. and will be retained by VitalWorks Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2015279EN.01003301.xml

| 24.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2015 — CMT v OHIM — Camomilla (CAMOMILLA)

(Case T-100/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark CAMOMILLA - Earlier national figurative mark Camomilla - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the Community trade mark - Relative ground for refusal - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Additional evidence brought before the Board of Appeal))

(2015/C 279/40)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: CMT Compagnia manifatture tessili Srl (CMT Srl) (Naples, Italy) (represented by: G. Floridia, R. Floridia, M. Franzoni and G. Rubino, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Camomilla SpA (Buccinasco, Italy) (represented by: A. Tornato and M. Mussi, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 November 2012 (case R 1616/2011-1), concerning invalidity proceedings between CMT — Compagnia manifatture tessili Srl (CMT Srl) and Camomilla SpA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM) of 29 November 2012 (case R 1616/2011-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM) of 29 November 2012 (case R 1616/2011-1);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay its own costs and those incurred by CMT Compagnia manifatture tessili Srl (CMT Srl). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay its own costs and those incurred by CMT Compagnia manifatture tessili Srl (CMT Srl).

| 3. | Orders CAMOMILLA SpA to pay its own cost. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders CAMOMILLA SpA to pay its own cost.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.

---
No. 09-11534.

#### In re Antonio Kendrick, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 217,

178 L. Ed. 2d 256,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7838.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 10-6490.

#### Cedric Greene, Petitioner v. Kelly Services, Inc.

562 U.S. 1033, 131 S. Ct. 575,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8793,

178 L. Ed. 2d 420,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
No. 09-11523.

#### Carlton J. Blount, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 885, 131 S. Ct. 214,

178 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7095.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 983 A.2d 1064.
No. 10-240.

#### John Steadman Nilsen, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1108, 131 S. Ct. 821,

178 L. Ed. 2d 556,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9653.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
#### In the Matter of Edward Mundinger, Petitioner, v Smithtown Central School District, Respondent.

[59 NYS3d 62]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Smithtown Central School District dated July 30, 2014, which adopted the report and recommendation of a hearing officer, made after a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law article 75, finding the petitioner guilty of certain disciplinary charges, and terminated the petitioner’s employment.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The standard of review of an administrative determination made after a quasi-judicial hearing required by law is limited to considering whether the determination was based on substantial evidence *(see Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*71 NY2d 135, 140 [1987]; *300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]; *Matter of Bosch v City of Middletown, N.Y.,*127 AD3d 855, 855-856 [2015]; *Matter of Martin v Board of Trustees of the Vil. of Pelham Manor,*86 AD3d 645 [2011]). It is the function of the administrative agency, not the reviewing court, to weigh the evidence, assess the credibility of witnesses, and determine which testimony to accept and which to reject *(see Matter of Bosch v City of Middletown, N.Y.,*127 AD3d at 855-856; *Matter of Morales-Reyes v Westchester County Dept. of Social Servs.,*81 AD3d 831 [2011]; *Matter of Duda v Board of Educ. of Uniondale Union Free School Dist.,*34 AD3d 580 [2006]). Where evidence is conflicting and room for choice exists, a reviewing court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the administrative agency *(see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 444 [1987]; *Matter of Bosch v City of Middletown, N.Y.,*127 AD3d at 856; *Matter of Ammann v Odestick,*73 AD3d 915 [2010]). Here, substantial evidence supported the determination of the respondent, Smithtown Central School District, that the petitioner committed certain acts of misconduct or insubordination.

The penalty of termination of the petitioner’s employment was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(see Matter of Kreisler v New York City Tr. Auth.,*2 NY3d 775, 776 [2004]; *Matter of Bosch v City of*
      *608
      *Middletown, N.Y.,*127 AD3d at 856; *Matter of Ware v Board of Fire Commr. of the Roosevelt Fire Dist.,*98 AD3d 523, 523 [2012]; *Matter of Loscuito v Scoppetta,*50 AD3d 905, 906 [2008]).

Balkin, J.P., Chambers, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.
No. 10-6933.

#### Leroy Carr, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1050, 131 S. Ct. 612,

178 L. Ed. 2d 446,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8842.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 388 Fed. Appx. 713.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 2-78465, 2-81026, 2-82260, 2-85387, 2-86457,
2-92391, 2-94757, 33-365, 33-2387, 33-5544, 33-17169, 33-24058, 33-30610, 33-
62551 and 333-35476), on Form S-4 (File No. 333-44933) and on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 2-87779, 33-10465, 33-17243, 33-42427, 33-50768, 33-57491, 33-57495, 33-
16461, 333-01639, and 333-75797) of Dynatech Corporation of our reports dated
June 21, 2000 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                          /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
June 21, 2000
# DSCC Operations Center celebrates 20th anniversary 

/ Published Oct. 31, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
For many of the employees who arrived at the newly opened Operations Center at Defense Supply Center Columbus in 1996, it was their first time working in a high-rise building. 

Thousands of associates have passed through its doors in the two decades since that summer morning when it officially opened, and a group of current and former workers came together Oct. 21 to celebrate its history at a ceremony inside the Ops Center’s auditorium.  

Home to the Defense Logistics Agency’s Land and Maritime command and a variety of installation tenants, the seven-story granite building known commonly as Building 20 has seen many upgrades over the years. 

Designed to accommodate the growing demands of digital communication, the building contains more than 450 miles of telephone and data processing cables, allowing associates to provide innovative logistics support to warfighters worldwide. 

During the ceremony, members of the audience who were present when the building first opened were invited on stage to be recognized and to take a group photo. DLA Land and Maritime’s acting commander, James McClaugherty referred to these employees during his remarks as “plank owners”, harkening back to the popular naval term for members of a crew who were present when the vessel was first commissioned. 

McClaugherty presented each plank owner with a special memento to represent their longstanding loyalty and history with the building.   

The ceremony also included a retrospective video showcasing the history of Building 20 and its people, with archival photos documenting the subtle changes in fashion and the not-so-subtle advancements in computer technology.

“This facility represents more than just granite and steel,” McClaugherty said. “This building is symbol of the excellence of this workforce, and the important mission that you all do each day.”

McClaugherty himself is a member of the Building 20 plank owners. He was director of Readiness and Business Operations at DSCC during the building’s construction and completion.  

 “As we look forward to the next 20 years we can all be sure that more improvements on this outstanding installation will continue to take place,” he said.

“Having witnessed the passage of time here as both a military officer and civilian I can tell you that we are blessed to have this building, and to have this collection of men and women who push themselves each day to do what we do.”