alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19603-19604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07802]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[9944-65-Region 6]

Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), notice is hereby given of a 
proposed administrative settlement concerning the Rab Valley Wood 
Preserving Superfund Site, located in Panama, LeFlore County, Oklahoma.
    The settlement requires Joslyn Manufacturing Company, settling 
party,

[[Page 19604]]

to pay a total of $280,000 as payment of past response costs to the 
Hazardous Substances Superfund. The settlement includes a covenant not 
to sue pursuant to Sections 106 and 107(a) of CERCLA, 42, U.S.C. 9606 
and 9607(a).
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this 
notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement. 
The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose 
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any 
comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 5, 2016.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement and additional background 
information relating to the settlement are available for public 
inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. A copy of the 
proposed settlement may be obtained from Kenneth Talton, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling (214) 665-7475. Comments 
should reference the Rab Valley Wood Preserving Superfund Site, Panama, 
LeFlore County, Oklahoma, and EPA Docket Number 6-02-16, and should be 
addressed to Kenneth Talton at the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Pletan, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or call (214) 665-8525.

    Dated: March 28, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2016-07802 Filed 4-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-08-00095 -CV NO. 03-08-00096- CV

Aud r e y A r le ne Ne sbit t, App e lla nt

v. P ete r Daniel Nesbitt, A ppellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF B ASTROP COUNTY , 335TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 02- 0762 8 , HO NORAB LE REVA TOWSLEE CO RB ETT , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant Audr ey

Arlene Nesbitt attempted to appe al pro se two orders e ntere d by the c ounty

c ourt at la w o n N ov e mbe r 1 4, 20 07 , d e nyinghe r m oti on s f or summa ry jud g me nt. B oth of the orders ar e i n t erlocutory and not appe alable. See B aker H ughes, Inc . v. Kec o R. &D., Inc ., 12 S.W. 3d

1, 5 ( Te x. 20 05 ); Du

Po nt Pho tom as k

s, In c . v . S

tra y ho rn , 219 S.W .3d 414, 418 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006, pet. denied). Wi thout a final judg ment or an othe rwise a ppeala ble orde r, we may not exer ci s e ap p el l ate jurisdiction. See Tex. Ci v. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (We st Su pp . 2 00 7) ; Lehmann v. Har- Con Corp. , 39 S.W .3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). On Marc h 2 7, 20 08 , this Court re qu e ste d th at N e sb itt

fi le a wr itt e n r e sp on se demonstratingthis Court’s jurisdiction over her appea ls. Nesbitt filed a r esponse on Apr il 3, 2008, but failed to demonstrate this Court’s jurisdiction. According ly , we dismiss both of Nesbitt’s appea ls for wa

nt of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(a)
.2 W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Apr il 18, 2008
No. 10-352.

#### Thomas McCoy Richardson, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 982, 131 S. Ct. 427,

178 L. Ed. 2d 324,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8195.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 607 F.3d 357.
No. 10-5603.

#### Harry Wheeler, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 931, 131 S. Ct. 325,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7488.

178 L. Ed. 2d 211,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 977 A.2d 973 and 987 A.2d 431.
No. 10-5706.

#### Sandako Meshawn Brandon, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 997, 131 S. Ct. 508,

178 L. Ed. 2d 365,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8655.

November 1, 2010.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 560 U.S. 563, 130 S. Ct. 2577, 177 L. Ed. 2d 68 (2010).

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 343.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


U.S.-South Africa Business Development Committee

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of membership opportunity.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice supplements the Federal Register Notice of April 
29, 1998 (63 FR 23420-23421) announcing membership opportunities for 
the U.S.-South Africa Business Development Committee. All information 
in the previous announcement remains current, except for the change to 
the closing date, as explained herein.

DATES: This notice extends the closing date of the referenced Federal 
Register Notice for one month to July 5, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Finn Holm-Olsen, South Africa Desk 
Officer, Office of Africa, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, telephone: (202) 482-5148, facsimile: (202) 
482-5198.
Sally K. Miller,
Director, Office of Africa.
[FR Doc. 98-16082 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DA-U
# C_2015056EN.01001501.xml

| 16.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 January 2015 — Club Hotel Loutraki and Others v Commission

(Case T-58/13) (1)

1

((State aid - Operation of Video Lottery Terminals - Grant by the Hellenic Republic of an exclusive licence - Decision finding no State aid - Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure - Serious difficulties - Procedural rights of the interested parties - Obligation to state reasons - Right to effective judicial protection - Advantage - Joint assessment of the notified measures))

(2015/C 056/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Club Hotel Loutraki AE (Loutraki, Greece); Vivere Entertainment AE (Athens, Greece); Theros International Gaming, Inc. (Patra, Greece); Elliniko Casino Kerkyras (Athens); Casino Rodos (Rhodes, Greece); Porto Carras AE (Alimos, Greece); Kazino Aigaiou AE (Syros, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Afonso and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-M. Mamouna and K. Boskovits, acting as Agents); and Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou AE (OPAP) (Athens, Greece) (represented: initially by K. Fountoukakos-Kyriakakos, Solicitor, L. Van den Hende and M. Sánchez Rydelski, lawyers, and subsequently by M. Petite and A. Tomtsis, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 6777 final of 3 October 2012 on State aid SA.33  988 (2011/N) — Greece — Arrangements for the extension of OPAP’s exclusive right to operate 13 games of chance and the granting of an exclusive licence to operate 35  000 Video Lottery Terminals for a period of 10 years.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Club Hotel Loutraki AE, Vivere Entertainment AE, Theros International Gaming, Inc., Elliniko Casino Kerkyras, Casino Rodos, Porto Carras AE and Kazino Aigaiou AE to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou AE (OPAP); |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Club Hotel Loutraki AE, Vivere Entertainment AE, Theros International Gaming, Inc., Elliniko Casino Kerkyras, Casino Rodos, Porto Carras AE and Kazino Aigaiou AE to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou AE (OPAP);

| 3) | Orders the Hellenic Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Hellenic Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.

1

---
# Troop Support Academy shows workforce their impact on warfighter

/ Published Nov. 9, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

On a base with no tanks, ships or jets, and while tucked away in office cubicles, many Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employees rarely encounter the military might they help provide.

That is why more than 100 employees attended Troop Support Academy, a three-day course aimed at providing an expanded perspective of the organization and its impact on its primary customer - the warfighter. 

Two days of the course were devoted to presentations and discussions by senior leaders and representatives of DLA Troop Support’s five supply chains and other support offices. 

“Troop Support Academy reinforced the magnitude all the supply chains take part in, regarding the safety and sustainment of our troops,” said Henia Montague, a purchasing agent in the Subsistence supply chain. “It's a concerted effort by everyone at DLA that keeps the cog operational.”

Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton, DLA Troop Support commander, told the class about a logistics-related predicament he faced as a combat-zone commander. He explained how his soldiers needed more tents in order to better execute their mission. 

One call to DLA Troop Support got it done.

“Within weeks, we had equipment that saved lives,” he said. “It’s not just a transaction. It’s the real thing.” 

Montague said Hamilton’s story was one of her favorite parts of Troop Support Academy.

“There is a quote from John Quincy Adams, ‘If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.’” Montague said. 

When measured against Adams’ quote, she said her commander met the mark because his story made her feel more inspired about her role within the organization.  

The presentations provided a big-picture perspective of the organization, but the academy’s planners decided that no Troop Support lesson would be complete without a visit to the troops themselves. The class visited Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey Nov. 2.

They toured two mobility aircraft, a firehouse, a crisis-response unit and a dining facility, talking with service members at each stop.

“Meeting with many troops and having the privilege of seeing how they live and how they defend us, and also seeing how the job I perform impacts their life, it really was incredible,” said John Procopio, a contract specialist in the Subsistence supply chain. “The role I perform day-to-day, and the efforts I put into carrying out my duties, is satisfying because it is going toward a great cause, and that is to support the real superheroes in this world, our warfighters.”

Procopio said that both the presentations and the base tour were enlightening.

“Troop Support Academy was a great experience and taught me a lot about both DLA and the warfighter,” Procopio said. “It brought the knowledge and experience I have obtained working here full circle, and I now better understand the crucial role we play in supporting our customers.”
#### Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc., Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Hanover Insurance Company, Respondent.

[67 NYS3d 455]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, J.), entered June 23, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment declaring that defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify it on a primary, noncontributory basis in the underlying personal injury action and to reimburse it for all reasonable costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees expended by it in that action, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion granted, and it is so declared.

The insurance policy issued by defendant to Peter Pan provides coverage for damages owed because of, inter alia, “ ‘bodily injury’. . . caused by an ‘accident’ and resulting from the ownership, maintenance or use of a covered ‘auto.’ ” Regardless of whether the plaintiff in the underlying action, having arrived at her destination on a Peter Pan bus and seen the driver unloading the passengers’ luggage, tripped over a *611suitcase while approaching her own suitcase or tripped on the curb while looking for her suitcase, her accident resulted from Peter Pan’s use of the bus, a covered auto, and defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify Peter Pan in the underlying action (see *BP A.C. Corp. v One Beacon Ins. Group,*8 NY3d 708, 714 [2007]; *Axton Cross Co. v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.,*176 AD2d 482 [1st Dept 1991], *lv dismissed*79 NY2d 822 [1991]; *Cosmopolitan Mut. Ins. Co. v Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co.,*18 AD2d 460 [1st Dept 1963]).

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Kapnick, Kahn, Kern, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          9
<CIK>                  0001064160
<NAME>           IBL BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             314
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,887
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,823
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,577
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,530
<LOANS>                                         18,281
<ALLOWANCE>                                        402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,799
<DEPOSITS>                                      23,764
<SHORT-TERM>                                       495
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 89
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  27,799
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    732
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  116
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    74
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   921
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 443
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 454
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              467
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        6
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    140
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        89
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.47
<LOANS-NON>                                        186
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    101
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   399
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  402
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               120
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            282


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tomas Domena, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 881]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael Gross, J.), rendered August 8, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Gesmer and Singh, JJ.
# Jacksonville materiel planner named DLA Aviation EOM

/ Published June 20, 2016
RICHMOND, Va., 
Richard McGrory received the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation April Employee of the Month award for spearheading and aligning DLA Aviation at Jacksonville with “Better Buying Power concepts and practices.”  DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Allan Day congratulated McGrory during a video teleconference award ceremony held from Richmond, Virginia, June 8.

McGrory, a materiel planner, who works in Jacksonville, Florida, in the DLA Aviation Customer Operations Directorate’s Industrial Planning and Support, Aircraft and Components Cell, works with internal and external customers on a daily basis.  During April, his collaborative efforts with commercial industry resulted in vendor price breaks optimizing a cost saving in excess of $257,000.

Bradley Shepherd, McGrory’s supervisor and his cell chief, nominated him for the award.

“A renowned materiel planner, Richard collaborates daily with the customer service supervisors, demand planners and sustainment specialists,” said Shepherd. “He possesses an incalculable level of knowledge to identify and offer viable technical solutions to encompass safety stock, replacement factors and inspired quantum increases to the Gross Demand Plan.”  Shepherd mentioned other notable actions by McGrory in the nomination packet he submitted for him to include his superior ability to use DLA and Navy systems in identifying and forecasting stock requirements.

McGrory was a little surprised and embarrassed to receive the award. He attributes his selection to his passion for the mission and supporting our warfighters.

“We all work so well together as a team here in Jacksonville; it's a little hard for me to accept an individual award, but, I really do appreciate it,”he said. “Our combined efforts really do make a difference. Our team/cross process approach to this support is the key to our success.”

Shepherd also spoke of McGrory as a “key orchestrator” in holding knowledge transfer sessions that have practical applications.

“Richard infuses enthusiasm with best practice solutions within the planning section and his team-building efforts lead to cohesiveness within DLA Aviation at Jacksonville,” said Shepherd.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

December 14, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 133597 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. GHALEB NAJIB HADDAD, Stephen J. Markman, Personal Representative of the Justices Estate of Shibli Jamil Haddad, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 133597 COA: 266646 Macomb CC: 2 004-001381-NH DR. WALEED MAMMO, D.D.S., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of September 24, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the February 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals was he ld in abeyance pending the decision in Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on November 28, 2007 , ___ Mich ___ (2007), the application is again considered and, pursuan t to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Cour t of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Macomb Ci rcuit Court for entry of an ord er denying the defendant's motion for summary disposition and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order and the order in Mullins

.

l1211 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 14, 2007
Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Terry Eleftheriou, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Terry Eleftheriou
-----------------------
Terry Eleftheriou
Chief Financial Officer
July 11, 2008

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re
Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
No. 10-5665.

#### John Rhett, Petitioner v. New Jersey.

562 U.S. 964, 131 S. Ct. 460,

178 L. Ed. 2d 293,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8054.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.