alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.42


 


WILMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.


303 Harper Drive


Moorestown, NJ 08057


 


September       , 2000


 


Parthenon Capital, Inc.


200 State Street


Boston,
Massachusetts 02109


 


Gentlemen:


 


1.                                       This
letter (the “Amendment”) amends the letter agreement (the “Management
Agreement”) dated May 16, 2000 between WILMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. (the “Company”)
and PARTHENON CAPITAL, INC. (“PCI”) whereby the Company has engaged PCI to act
as its financial advisor.


 


2.                                       Section
2 of the Management Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the
following substituted in lieu thereof:


 


The engagement of PCI hereunder shall be for
a term of five years commencing on September 29, 2000 and ending on September
29, 2005.


 


3.                                       
Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all of the terms and conditions
of the Management Agreement are ratified and shall remain unchanged and
continue in full force and effect.


 


4.                                       This
letter agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of New York applicable to agreements made and to be performed
entirely in such state.  This letter
agreement may not be amended or otherwise modified except by a written
instrument, signed by PCI and the Company. 
If any provision hereof is determined to be invalid or unenforceable, such
determination shall not affect any other provision of this letter agreement,
each of which shall remain in full force and effect.  This letter agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement.


 






















 


If the foregoing correctly sets forth our
understanding, please indicate so by signing below and returning an executed
copy of this letter agreement to us.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  WILMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted and agreed to as of

  
	
  the date first written above:

  
	
   

  
	
  PARTHENON CAPITAL, INC.

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  
	
  Title:

  
						



 


2
# Feds Feed Families returns to DLA

/ Published July 17, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The annual Feds Feed Families food drive is back, giving people the opportunity to donate food to local food banks and pantries.

Defense Logistics Agency employees can leave nonperishable canned or boxed food donations in marked boxes at pods 1, 7 and 9 on the first floor of the McNamara Headquarters Complex, as well as a box near the main entrance. Donations will go the Capital Area Food Bank.

Employees are also encouraged to look for weekly messages detailing themes and additional campaign information.

Feds Feed Families, a Department of Agriculture program, runs through Sept. 30.

“As Defense Logistics Agency employees, our duty is to support warfighters with what they need when they need it, from fuel to uniforms to food. As concerned citizens, we are called upon to help our neighbors get what they need when times are tough. I know the generous spirit of our workforce will come through again this year for Feds Feed Families, and I thank everyone who chooses to participate,” said DLA Chief of Staff Eric Smith.

In addition to donating food, federal employees can volunteer at a food bank or glean at a farm, which is collecting excess produce for those in need. Information about volunteering is available the Feds Feeds Families website.

Summer can be challenging for the nearly 30 million children who receive free and reduced-priced meals during the school year, according to Feds Feeds Families information. While many of these students rely on the USDA’s summer meal programs, food banks tend to see a decrease in donations but an increase in need during the summer.

Since launching in 2009, Feds Feed Families has collected more than 99 million pounds of food for donation. According to the program, in 2020, about one in seven households with children were food insecure.

For more information, contact Sonya Sierra with DLA Installation Management at 571-767-0735 or sonya.sierra@dla.mil.
Sample of EPA NSR Lawsuits and Targeted Projects

Air Heaters

o Sierra Club v. Dairyland Power Coop. (filed in 2010)

o NOVs issued to American Municipal Power & Painesville Municipal Elec. Plant

(2009)

Steam Turbine Upgrade

o Conservation Law Found. v. Public Service of New. Hamp. (filed in 2011)

o United States v. A meren (filed in 2011)

o U.S. v. AEP, U.S. v. Cinergy , U.S. v. Duke Energy (filed in 1999)

o Mississippi Power Company 114 Letter

Boiler Feed Pumps

o New York v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (filed in 2005)

o NOV issued to Nebraska Public Power District (2008)
# 23-930

20 Dogwood LLC v. Village of Roslyn Harbor

4-3-24

10.05714
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2348 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2348

 To repeal the prohibitions against political recommendations relating 
to Federal employment and United States Postal Service employment, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 2 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

   Mr. Simon introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the prohibitions against political recommendations relating 
to Federal employment and United States Postal Service employment, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITIONS AGAINST POLITICAL RECOMMENDATIONS 
              RELATING TO FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT AND UNITED STATES POSTAL 
              SERVICE EMPLOYMENT.

    (a) Federal Employment.--(1) Section 3303 of title 5, United States 
Code, is repealed.
    (2)(A) The table of sections for chapter 33 of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended by striking out the item relating to section 
3303.
    (B) Section 2302(b)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 
to read as follows:
            ``(2) solicit or consider any recommendation or statement, 
        oral or written, with respect to any individual who requests or 
        is under consideration for any personnel action unless such 
        recommendation or statement is based on the personal knowledge 
        or records of the person furnishing it and consists of--
                    ``(A) an evaluation of the work performance, 
                ability, aptitude, or general qualifications of such 
                individual; or
                    ``(B) an evaluation of the character, loyalty, or 
                suitability of such individual;''.
    (b) United States Postal Service Employment.--(1) Section 1002 of 
title 39, United States Code, is repealed.
    (2) The table of sections for chapter 10 of title 39, United States 
Code, is amended by striking out the item relating to section 1002.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015046EN.01005102.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Faita v EESC

(Case T-619/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Psychological harassment - Lack of assistance and a breach of the duty of care - Error of law - Right of defence))

(2015/C 046/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Carla Faita (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. de Abreu Caldas, M. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, assisted by M. Troncoso Ferrer and F. M. Hislaire, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 September 2013 in Faita v EESC (F-92/11, ECR — SC, EU:F:2013:130), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Ms Carla Faita to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Carla Faita to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC).

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
No. 10-200.

#### John E. Fitzgibbons, Petitioner v. Sally J. Zeman, Trustee.

562 U.S. 981, 131 S. Ct. 415,

178 L. Ed. 2d 323,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8300.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 365 Fed. Appx. 126.
# C_2014071EN.01000201.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 5 November 2013 — Nóra Baczó and János István Vizsnyiczai v Raiffeisen Bank Zrt.

(Case C-567/13)

(2014/C 71/02)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Nóra Baczó, János István Vizsnyiczai

Defendant: Raiffeisen Bank Zrt.

Questions referred

| 1. | In proceedings brought before a local court for a declaration of the invalidity of a contract (standard contract terms), in which the consumer also seeks in his application a declaration of the unfairness of a term of the contract at issue in the proceedings, and thereby provides a basis for the jurisdiction of another court, the county court (törvényszék), is there a disadvantage for the consumer, given that, in proceedings brought by the other party to the contract, the consumer can rely on the unfairness of a contract term (1) before the local court, and transfer to the county court burdens the consumer with higher costs? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In proceedings brought before a local court for a declaration of the invalidity of a contract (standard contract terms), in which the consumer also seeks in his application a declaration of the unfairness of a term of the contract at issue in the proceedings, and thereby provides a basis for the jurisdiction of another court, the county court (törvényszék), is there a disadvantage for the consumer, given that, in proceedings brought by the other party to the contract, the consumer can rely on the unfairness of a contract term (1) before the local court, and transfer to the county court burdens the consumer with higher costs?

| 2. | Would the situation be more equal if, in proceedings brought by the consumer before the local court for a declaration of the invalidity of a contract, the consumer were able also to rely on the unfairness of a term of the contract, as a result of which that local court would have jurisdiction? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Would the situation be more equal if, in proceedings brought by the consumer before the local court for a declaration of the invalidity of a contract, the consumer were able also to rely on the unfairness of a term of the contract, as a result of which that local court would have jurisdiction?

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts; OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

---
No. 10-6418.

#### Drakenold T. Nguyen, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 988, 131 S. Ct. 430,

178 L. Ed. 2d 334,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8235.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 620.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Green, Appellant.

[55 NYS3d 904]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 8, 2014 *(People v Green,*121 AD3d 808 [2014]), determining an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 6, 2010.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*
      *718463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Rivera, J.P., Hall, Miller and Duffy, JJ., concur.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00472- CV

In re Daniel Montes

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM H AY S CO UNTY

M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Daniel Montes filed petitions seeking a writ of mandamus along wi t h numerous other filings. Howeve r, t he record refle cts t h at M ontes has been adjudg ed a vexatious 1 litigant, thus requiring him to comply with pref iling order s u nder chapte r 11 of the civil prac tice and reme dies code for any litigation, orig inal proce eding , appea l, or other claim he prese nts. S ee Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 11.101; see also In re Montes , No. 05-08-00422- CV, 2008 Tex. App.
L EXI S 2593, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 9, 2008, orig

. proce eding ) (mem. op.) (addr essing Dallas County order decla ring Montes a vexatious litigant). Because a vexatious litigant who is subject to a pref

iling order must comply with chapte r 11 by obtaining an order fr o m t h e l o cal admi nistrative judge permitting the litigant’s reque sted filing, we notified Montes on August 14,

Montes filed: (1) a petition for writ of manda m u s ; (2) a brief in support of his petition 1 for writ of mandamus; (3) a supplemental petition for writ of mandamus; (4) an amende d petitio n fo r wr i t of mandamus and supplemental appendix; (5) an emer g ency motion for stay of proce eding s; (6) a second emer g ency motion for stay ; (7) a motion for sanctions ag ainst a rea l party in interest and her counsel; (8) a supplemental brief in suppo rt o f s an ct i ons ag ainst a real party in interest and her counsel; (9) a motion for sanctions ag ainst counsel fo r re al p arties in interest; (10) a reply in support of his a mended petition f

or writ of mandamus, and (11) a motion to decla re the pre filing or der void a

nd to strike the notice of

the orde r.2015 that his petition was subject to the pref iling require ment and reque sted that he p rovide the require d order

by Aug ust 21, 2015. See Tex. Ci v. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 11.102, .1035.
I nstead of providing t h e re q u i red order , Montes filed a motion arguing that the vexatious litigant pref

iling order ag ainst him is void beca use it was not i n co rpora ted into a final judgme nt. There is no such require ment in the statute. See id. § 11.001-.104. Be cause Montes has
not complied with chapte r 11 by o b t ai n i n g the require d order from the local administrative judge permitting his filings, Montes’s petitions for wr it of mandamus, motions for sanctions, motion to decla re the pref

iling order void, a

nd motion to strike the notice of the orde r ar e dismissed. See id. § 11.1035(b). Montes’ s second e merg ency motion for stay

is dismi ssed as moot.

_________________________ _________________ J eff Rose, Chief J ustice
Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field Filed: Aug ust 18, 2015

2
2017-0296.

#### Anderson v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth.

Cuyahoga App. No. 103732, 2017-Ohio-86.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,300
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,882
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,407
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          35,031
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            34,039
<LOANS>                                        257,936
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 358,015
<DEPOSITS>                                     295,362
<SHORT-TERM>                                    24,231
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,172
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,944
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 358,015
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,847
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,296
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   793
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,936
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,484
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,385
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,551
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,283
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,283
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,594
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.02
<LOANS-NON>                                        661
<LOANS-PAST>                                       248
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,686
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       96
<RECOVERIES>                                       109
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,799
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,799
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### *Com. v.*Ryals

11/02/2015

230 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 118 A.3d 447
# Employee Spotlight: Maggie Mieras

/ Published Jan. 24, 2020
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
                Maggie Mieras                            Maggie Mieras was recently hired as the new funds and facilities branch chief within the business support directorate at Battle Creek, Michigan.Mieras retired earlier this year from the military after 32 years of service in the Army with 16 years as a logistics officer.She deployed to Iraq in 2007 for a year as the headquarters commander for the Michigan Army National Guard’s 177th Military Police Brigade. She took 11 ROTC cadets from around the Nation to Costa Rica under the university ROTC Cultural Understanding and Language Program in 2011, and also volunteered for a short training team mission to Liberia in 2014 in support to the Armed Forces of Liberia.She holds a Master of Science in Law Enforcement Intelligence and Analysis from Michigan State University.Mieras enjoys traveling, kayaking, biking and volunteering for the American Legion Post #123 out of Kent City, Michigan.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Jace ArmstrongVIRIN: 200103-D-OS362-002Maggie Mieras was recently hired as the new funds and facilities branch chief within the business support directorate at Battle Creek, Michigan.

Mieras retired earlier this year from the military after 32 years of service in the Army with 16 years as a logistics officer.

She deployed to Iraq in 2007 for a year as the headquarters commander for the Michigan Army National Guard’s 177th Military Police Brigade. She took 11 ROTC cadets from around the Nation to Costa Rica under the university ROTC Cultural Understanding and Language Program in 2011, and also volunteered for a short training team mission to Liberia in 2014 in support to the Armed Forces of Liberia.

She holds a Master of Science in Law Enforcement Intelligence and Analysis from Michigan State University.

Mieras enjoys traveling, kayaking, biking and volunteering for the American Legion Post #123 out of Kent City, Michigan.
#### Reyes, Matter of, v Annucci

3d Dept: 150 AD3d 1373

denied*
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), the undersigned, David C. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify to his knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ David C. Kahn Chief Financial Officer
 May 18, 2011
April 30, 2014

CAAP-12-0001004

#### Balog v. Wakita

Affirmed
# Agency employees help sailors ship out their hazardous wastes

/ Published April 15, 2016
Yokosuka, Japan, 
Anyone who has ever done an oil change or other automobile tune-up work knows it is no fun getting rid of used oils or fluids. Imagine dealing with thousands of pounds of such hazardous wastes from Navy ships.Sailors at Navy Fleet Activities, Yokosuka, Japan, watched recently as DLA Disposition Services personnel provided hazardous-waste disposal and tank cleaning for 19,000 pounds of materials from U.S. 7th Fleet ships. According to Norma Quitugua with DLA Disposition Services' Environmental Branch at Sagami, Japan, the Ship Repair Facility maintains vessels berthed at Yokuska and pumps their used oils, sludge, diesel fuel and antifreeze into above-ground tanks ashore. Quitugua said the holding tanks range from 1,000 to 100,000 gallons.“Once the tank capacity is full, we come in with our HW contractors, ready to perform services,” Quitugua said.For all the hazardous and regulated non-hazardous wastes destined for ultimate disposal in mainland Japan, Quitugua said service is provided by Japan Iron Engineering, or JFE. Special services for the cleaning and purging of all tank requirements is subcontracted to the Asada group, which cleans out the tanks with approved methods such as detergent cleaners and power washing.Sagami receives requests for this type of support once or twice a month. The wastes that are pumped and cleaned out are then transported to a final disposal treatment storage facility in Japan. Navy figures show that, on average, DLA Disposition Services annually processes 642,300 pounds from pump out operations and 73,800 pounds for tank cleaning.