September 17, 2015

Exemption No. 1 2909 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 20 15

– 1460

Mr. Thomas Ethen President North W est Aerial Perspectives 15414 West Bluegrass Road Nine Mile Falls, WA 99026

Dear Mr. Thomas Ethen :
This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

By letter dated April 28, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of North W est Aerial Perspectives ( h ereinafter petitioner or operator ) for an exemption

. The petitioner requested to operate an unmanned ai rcraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial photography, videography, surveying, and inspections

. See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA des cribing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption

. The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Phantom 2, SynDrone X8, and Gemini fixed

wing UAS

. The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, C ertification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates

. In accordance with the statutory criteria2

provided in Section 333 of P ublic Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U

. S

. C

. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief f rom 14 CFR part 21

, C ertification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is
not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection 1

. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption No s

. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No . FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Lab s , Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater propo rtions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

 They are similar in a ll material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 ;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 also apply to the situation you present; and

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by th e Administrator, North W est Aerial Perspectives is granted an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

1 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF analysis, etc.), chemical measureme nt (particulate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by instruments aboard the UA.3

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, North W est Aerial Perspectives is hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom 2, SynDrone X8, and Gemini fixed

- wing UAS when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exempti on

.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming are not permitted.

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than correctiv e lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate or U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times ;

e lectronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must b e designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct it s operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administra tor upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and4

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator or a ny law enforcement official upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis up on which the FAA granted this exemption, then the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FA A’s UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g.

, replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exempti on. Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operat or is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre

- flight inspection and determine the UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre

- flight in spection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g.

, inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary mainte nance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a

cur rent FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of Col u mbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government. The PIC must also meet the flight revi ew requirements specified in 14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.5

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated und er this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51(b). F lights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs (traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption are p ermitted under the terms of this exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are consider ed nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as denoted in the curre nt FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbo l as denoted on the current FAA

- published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained or otherwi se permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS sign al, the UA must return to a
pre

- determined location within the pr ivate or controlled

- access prope rty.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the int ended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All operations shall be cond ucted in ac cordance with an ATO

- issued COA. The exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA

.6

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be ide ntified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N− Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and activities at all times.

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an a ccident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a mann er ensuring the safety of nonparticipating persons ; and b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to tho se objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or control led

- access property with permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FA A's UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.7

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming and production, the following addition al conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the a rea of proposed filming. The 3

- day notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities must include at l east the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights; b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of th e person responsible for the on

- scene operation of the UAS; d. Make, model, and serial or N− Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming; f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners and/or local officials to conduct the filming production eve nt; the list of those who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;
g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or st ate over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as spe cified in the exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.8

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely, / s/ John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service

EnclosuresNorthWest Aerial Perspectives

1 | Page

– NWAP Exemption Request April 30 , 2015 April 28 , 2015

Thomas M. Ethen 15414 W Bluegrass Rd Nine Mile Falls, WA 99026 (509) 733

- 2928 teimages@sbcglobal.net

Petition of Northwest Aerial Perspectives For Exemp tion Pursuant to Section 333 Of the FAA Moder nization and Reform Act of 2012

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 CFR Part 11, Northwest Aerial Perspectives ( NWAP ), hereby applies for an exemption from Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) identified below, to allow commercial operations of small unmanned aerial system s ( i.e. , sUAS).

This exemption is in accordance with protocols outlined in this petition for exemption, and any other requir ements established by the FAA pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act.

This exemption would permit commercial operation by NWAP , which uses a DJI Phantom 2, a SynDrone X8 multirotor and a Gemini fixed wing sUAS to conduct :

- Aerial surveying

- Event Photography/Videography

- Agriculture purposes

- Real Estate Photography

- Aerial F ilmmaking and P hotography

- Construction S ite I nspections and M onitoring , and

- News G athering and First Responders

.

NWAP ’s operation under the exemption will be subject to strict operating requirements and conditions to ensure an equivale nt level of safety to currently authorized operations using manned aircraft and under c onditions as may be modified by the FAA as required by Section 333.

NWAP 's sUAS will be operated under controlled VFR conditions a t low altitudes

. They will operate the sUAS’s with pilots who have comprehensive UAV / UAS / Drone flight training for competency and new FAA 333 and Part 107 commercial compliance requirements . Finally, when
req uired, the FAA ATC will approve the airspace in which the sUAS will operate in advance

. NorthWest Aerial Perspectives respectfully submits this request for an exemp tion because it operates sUAS's . The FAA can have confidence that the operations will b e conducted at an equivalent level of safety or greater . Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secreta ry of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities under SectionNorthWest Aerial Perspectives

2 | Page

– NWAP Exemption Request April 30 , 2015 333(c) of the Reform Act to “estab lish req uirements for the safe operation of such aircraft s ystems in the national airspace system.”

For your convenience, NWAP has organized this Exemption request as follows: I. Petitioner's Description II. Relevant Statutory Authority III. Qualifications for Approval Under Section 333 of the Reform Act IV. Description of Proposed Operations V. Regulations From Which Exemption is Requested VI. Public Interest VII. Privacy VIII. Federal Registry Summary IX. Conclusion

I. Petitioner's Description: NorthWest Aerial Perspectives
, headquartered in Nine Mile Falls, WA , is a company that provides sUAS support to news and event videography , real estate and construction site photography, film and movie production, precision agricultural purposes, education, and demonstration flights in a compliant and safe envir onment. NWAP plans on providing a wide
range of services as the sUAS market expands.

NWAP 's goal is to operate in an accident

- free environment by:

• Demonstrating a commitment by management and all employee s to operate in a compliant

manner.

• Identify ing haz ard and risk while eliminating or controlling all these risk s

.

• Using steps to intervene and report when unsafe work practices appear to exist.

• Train ing all employees involved in flight operations to operate at the highest standard level.

The contact information for Petitioner is as follows:

NorthWest Aerial Perspectives
, 15414 W Bluegrass Rd Nine Mile Falls, WA 99026

Owners : Thomas Ethen Dave Plouffe Office: ( 509 ) 733

- 2928 Email: teimages@sbcglobal.net II. Relevant Statutory Authority: This petition for exemption is submitted to fulfill Co ngress' goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act. Congress has directed the FAA "to safely accelerate the integration of civil

un manned aircraft sys tems into the national airspace system." Pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform A ct, the FAA Administrator is to consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the National Airspace ("NAS") before completion of t he form al UAS rulemaking, based on the following considerations:

• The UAS's size, weight, speed, and operational capability;NorthWest Aerial Perspectives

3 | Page

– NWAP Exemption Request April 30 , 2015 • Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and

• Operation of the UAS within the visual line of sight of the operator.

If the Secretary determines that such vehicles "may operate safely in the National Airspace System, the Secretary shall establish require ments for the safe operation of such aircraft in the National Airspace System". Additionally, the FAA A dministrator has general authority to grant exemptions from i ts safety regulations and minimum standards , and has done so on numerous occasions, when the Ad ministrator decides a requested exemption is in the public interest. A party requestin g an exemption must explain the reasons why the exemption: (1) would benefit the public as a whole, and (2) would n ot adv ersely affect safety (or how it would provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rules). The Federal Aviation Act express ly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This statutory authority, by its terms, includes exempting civ il aircraft, as the term is defined under 40101 of the Act, from the requirement that all civil aircraft must have a current airworthiness

ce rtificate and those regulations requiring commercial pilots to operate aircraft in commercial service: The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a

regulation prescribed unde r subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any of sections.

III. Qualifications for Approval Under Section 333 of the Reform Act The proposed operations in this petition for exemption qualify for expedited approval under Section 333 of the Reform Act. Each of the statut ory criteria and other relevant factors are satisfied. The proposed operations would permit NWAP the us e of small UAS under controlled conditions in airspace that is: (1) predetermined; (2) co ntrolled as to access; and that (3) provides an increased level of safety beyond that ex isting when fixed or rotor wing aircraft are used to accomplish the
same purpose. NWAP uses s UASs that are multirotor, weighing less th an 30 pounds including payload. They operate, under normal conditions, at speeds no t to exceed 100 mph and have the capability to fly, hover, and move in the vertical and horizontal plane. NWAP ’s s UASs will operate in line of sight, during daylight hours, and wil l only operate within a sterile area. NWAP will operate at or below 500 feet AGL and will file a NOTAM for each flight opera ted in controlled airspace. All required permissions and permits would be obtained fro m territorial, state, county or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcem ent, fire, or other appropriate governmental agencies prior to operating a sUAS. Given the sma ll size of the sUAS’s involved and the restricted sterile environment within which they will operate, NWAP ’s exemption falls within the zone of safety and demonstrate s an equivalent level of safety, in wh ich Congress desired the FAA to permit commercial UA S operations by exemption pe nding completion of formal rulemaking. Also, due to the size of the sUAS’s and the confined area in which the sUAS’s will operate, approval of the application presents no hazard in the NAS. Considering the clear direction in Sec tion 333 of the Reform Act, the authority contained in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended, the equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed operations, and the significa nt public benefit, the grant of the requested exemptions is also in the public interest.NorthWest Aerial Perspectives

4 | Page

– NWAP Exemption Request April 30 , 2015 IV. Description of Proposed Operations To assist the FAA in its safety assessment of NWAP 's proposed sUAS operations, below is a summary of operational limitations and conditions that will ensure an equivalent or highe r level of safety to operations conducted under current regulatory guidelines: 1. The sUAS will weigh less than 30 pounds. 2. Flights will be operated within line of sight of the PIC and observer. 3. Maximum total flight time for each ope rational flight will be lim ited to the amount of time the sUAS ca n be flown and still maintain a reserve battery power of no less than 25%. 4. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 500 feet AGL. 5. Flights will be operated at a lateral dist ance of least 100 feet from any inhabited structures, buildings, vehicles, vessels, people not associated with the operation or who have not si gned a waiver in adv ance of the operation. 6. Minimum crew for each ope ration will consist of the sUAS Pilot in Command and a Visual Observer. 7. The sUAS Pilot in Command will hold at least a sport pilot or recreational pilot certificate and a valid U.S. drivers license. 8. NWAP will designate a Pilot in Command ( PIC) for each mission. 9. The sUAS will operate only with in a confined "Sterile Area". 10. Prior to the operations at a particular l ocation, a site inspection will have been conducted. On the da y of the mission the management person with operational con trol and the PIC will concur on dispatching of the mission. 11. A briefing will be conducted in regard t o the planned sUAS operations prior to each day's missions. It will be mandatory that all personne l who will be performing duties within the boundaries of the sterile area be present for this briefing. 12. NWAP crew will use the checkli st and callouts required in the Operations Manual. 13. All sUAS’s will be maintained in acc ordance with inspection program specified in the manufacturer’s guidelines. 14. In the event of an accident involving an NWAP sUAS, they will cease operations and report the accident to the NTSB an d AFS

- 80. 15. Pilot in Command and Visua l Observer will at all times be able to communicate by voice. 16. Pilot in Command, Visual Observer, Camera Operator, and Operational Personnel will have been trained and tested in accor dance to FAA, NTSB, and AFS

- 80 best practices

. 17. All required permissions and permits would be obtained from territorial, state, county or city jur isdictions, including local law enforcement, fire or other appropriate governmental agencies. 18. NWAP management will submit a written “Plan of Activities” to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) having jurisdiction over the area of propos ed filming three days in advance of operations during film or movie productions. 19. If the sUAS loses communications signal, the sUAS will have the cap ability to return to a
pre

- determined l ocation within the Sterile Area and land. 20. Contingency plans will be in place to s afely terminate flight if there is a loss of communication between the pilot and the observer. 21. The sUAS PIC has the capabili ty to abort a flight in case of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies. 22. NWAP , by following FAA, NTSB, and AFS

- 80 best practices, will assure no individuals’ privacy is violated.NorthWest Aerial Perspectives

5 | Page

– NWAP Exemption Request April 30 , 2015 23. Procedures have been established in NWAP ’s Operations Manual to contact ATC prior to operating in airspace other than G. V. Regulations From Which Exemption is Requested Statutory Authority Section 333, titled “Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems”, provides a mechanism for seeking expedited FAA authorization of safe civil UAS operations in the NAS. Section 333(a) states that the FAA “shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the (comprehensive) plan and rulemaking required by section 332(b)(1) of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act.” In Section 332(b)(1), Congress made it clear that Section 333 provides a mechanism for “expedited operation authorization” if several factors are met. Petitioner meets all requirements to perm it FAA approval of commercial UAS operations. The Petitioner Requests Relief From the Following: A. 14 CFR § 91.103: Preflight Action NWAP requests an exemption from the prefl ight actions requirements of 14 CFR 91.113 that prescribes the preflight actions un der which aircraft may operate: Each pilot in command shall, before beginning a f light, become familiar with all available information concerning that flight.

a. Flight under IFR or a flight not in the vicinity of an airport, weather reports and forecasts, fu el requirements, alternatives availab le if the planned flight
cannot be completed, and any known traffic delays of which the pilot in command has been adv

ised by ATC; b. For any flight, runway lengths at airports of intended use, and the following takeoff and landing distance information: i. For civil aircraft for which an approve d Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual containing takeoff and landing distance data is required, the takeoff and landing distance data contained therein; and ii. For civil aircraft other tha n those specif

ied in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, other reliable information appropria te to the aircraft, relating to aircraft performance under expected values of airport elevation an d runway slope, aircraft gross weight, and wind and temperature. NWAP will not operate sUAS’s under IFR conditions or when the ceilings are below 1000 feet and the visibility is below 3 statute miles. NWAP ’s sUAS’s do not have a published approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual containing takeoff and landing dista nce data. Equivalent Level of Safety In adherence to FAA, NTSB, and AFS

- 80 best practices, the PIC along with the person having operational control must follow regulations to assure that the weath er will be adequate to complete the mission in VFR condition

. B. 14 CFR 91.113: Right

- of

- Way Rules NWAP request s an exemption from 14 CFR 91.11 3 Right

- of

- way rules, requiring vigilance by each person operating an aircraft so as to see and avoid other aircraft. When a rule of this section gives another aircraft the right

- of

- way, the pilot shall give way to that aircraft and may not pass over, under, or ahead of it unless well clear. NorthWest Aerial Perspectives operates small pilotless UAS’s and cannot comply with these rules as they have been written. Equivalent L evel of Safety NWAP operates sUAS’s at or below an altitude of 500 feet AGL, well below the normal operating altitude of other aircraft. NWAP management require s that the Pilot in Command with experienceNorthWest Aerial Perspectives

6 | Page

– NWAP Exemption Request April 30 , 2015 oversee each mission and has knowledge of the see
- an d

- avoid rules. A Visual Observer will assist the PIC in looking for a ircraft entering the operations area. It’s the responsibility of the PIC to cease operatio ns and land the UAS immediately whenever an aircraft comes into the vicinity creating a potential threat. Operations will not recommence until the threat is clear. C. 14 CFR. § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes NWAP requests an exemption from the minimum s afe altitude requirements of 14 CFR 91.119 that prescribes the minimum safe alt itudes under which aircraft may operate:

• Over any congested area of a city, town, or s ettlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet ab ove the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft.

• Over other than congested areas at an altitude of 500 feet above the surface
, except over open water or sparsely populated area s. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure. Section 91.119 (d) allows for a helicopter to ope rate at less than those minimum altitudes when it can be operated "without hazar d to persons or property on the surface," provided that "each person operating the heli copter complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA." To provide the intended operations, the sUAS is n ormally operated below 500 feet AGL. Additionally, due to the nature of the pro posed operations, the sUAS will maintain a lateral distance of at least 100 feet from in habited structures, buildings, vehicles, and vessels, and from people not associated with th e operation. Equivalent Level of Safety Compared to normal aircraft, NWAP ’s multi

- ro tor and fixed wing aircraft weigh a maximum of 30 pounds, and given the lack of flammable fuel, a ny risk associated with these operations is far less than those that presently exist with conventional aircraft. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, and speed of the UAS, as well as the location where it is operated. As s et forth in the FAA, NTSB, and AFS

- 80 best practices , the sUAS will be operated in a sterile

area, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre

- o btained consent. Because of the adv ance notice to the property owners and participants, all affe cted individuals will be well aware of the planned flight operations prior to commencement of operations. Furthermore, by operating at such lower altitudes, t he sUAS will not interfere with aircraft that are subjec t to the minimum safe altitude regulatio ns. Finally, the successful safety record of the Phantom 2, Syndrone X8 and Gemini sUAS’s demonstra tes that the sUAS can be safely used at these lower altitudes and closer operating environments. D. 14 C.F.R. § 91.121: Altimeter Settings NWAP seeks an exemption from 14 CFR 91.121, which requires a person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude or flight level by re ference to an altimeter that is set to the elevation of the departure airport or barom etric pres sure. An exemption is required because the sUAS does not have a baromet

ric altimeter, but rather a GPS altitude read out. Equivalent Level of Safety An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by follow ing the procedures set forth in the FAA, NTSB, and AFS

- 80 best practices

. NWAP will confirm the altit ude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight. Moreover, th e PIC will use the GPS altitude indicator to constantly monitor the sUAS's height, thus ensuring operation at safe alti tudes. E. 14 CFR 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR ConditionsNorthWest Aerial Perspectives

7 | Page

– NWAP Exemption Request April 30 , 2015 NWAP requests an exemption from 14 CFR § 91.151(a)'s fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. Section 91.151 states:

a. No person may begin a flight in a n airplane under VFR condit ions unless (considering wind and foreca st weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing, and assuming normal cruising speed

– i. During the day, to fly after that for at least 25 minutes; or ii. At night, to fly after tha t for at least 45 minutes. The batteries powering NWAP ’s Phantom 2 and Syndrone X8 provide approximately 25

- 35 minutes of powered flight while the Gemini's provide 2 to 3 hours of powered flight . To meet the 30 minutes reserve requirement in 14 CFR 91.151, X8 sUAS flights could not be conducted. Given the limitation s on the sUAS's proposed flight area and the location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a safety margin based o n a reserve am ount of battery life is needed. NWAP will not be conducting any sUAS flights at night. Equivalent Level of Safety An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because t he operations will be conducted on
- site without significant transit time by the sUAS. All flights will be planned to terminate with no less than 25% reserve battery power st ill available. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the sUAS saf

ely to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its confined area of ope ration

eve n in the event of an unexpected occurrence. Operation of the sUAS with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel does not include the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was inten ded to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS, and the pro ximity of the flight operation to the landing zone. Moreover, operation will be limited to controlled areas where only people and property owners, or official representatives who have signed waivers will be allowed. F. 14 CFR § 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409 (a)(2); 91.417(a) and (b): Maintenance Inspections NWAP also seeks an exemption from the maintenance in spection requirements contained in 14 CFR 91.405(a), 91.407(a ) ( 1), 91.409(a ) ( 2), 91.41 7(a) and (b). These regulations specify maintenance and inspection standards in refe rence to 14 CFR Part 43. 14 CFR 91.405(a) (stating that each owner or operator of an ai rcraft "shall have the aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and sha ll between required inspections ...have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter"). An exemption to these regulations is needed because Part 43 and these sections only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, which the sUAS will not have. Equivalent Level of Safety An equiva lent level of safety will be achieved beca use maintenance and inspections will be performed in accordance with FAA, NTSB, and AFS

- 80 best practices. The operator will ensure that the sUAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, pe rform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. The opera tor is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircra ft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent level of safety. If mechanical issues arise, the sUAS's size and carrying cap acity, and the fact that flight operations will only take place in restricted areas for limited periods of time during daylight hours, creates less risk than that associated with conventional roto rcraft or fixe d wing aircraft performing the same operation. VI. PUBLIC INTEREST Granting NorthWest Aerial Perspectives an exemption further s the public interest in and around the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Montana . National policy set by Congress favors early integration of s UA S into the national airspace in controlled, safe working environments suchNorthWest Aerial Perspectives

8 | Page

– NWAP Exemption Request April 30 , 2015 as those propose in this petition. The one vision of NWAP is to help facilitate safe integratio n of sUAS’s into mainstream USA in the following areas:

• Aerial Surveying

o As with construction imaging, aerial imaging flights will be used to capture aerial photos for the purpose of creating orthomosaics (image maps). The image maps will be used to compute volume, create 3D models, DSM’s, DTM’s, profile and contour l ines.

• Movies and Event Photography

o Whether the shot requires unique views and expansive panning or altitude with radical views, the s UAS is desi gned to hold up under demanding conditions. Because of the autopilot fe ature with pre

- designed mission management and R/C control interrupt, the pilot and camera operator can easily create the ultimate shot with HD video or HD s till photos. When working close in on a closed set the hazards to the actors are substantially reduced due to the size of the sUAS.

• Precision Agriculture

o This technology, which uses a variety of spectral data, has potential for several agricultural uses, including: early

- generation crop breeding line evaluations, quick and wide

- scale scouting of croplands for crop conditions and weed densities, grassland conditions and production evaluation, detection of noxious weeds and detection of blue green algae blooms in ponds and reservoirs. In addition, the technology allow the monitoring of water use and will allow the land owner to directly control the quantity of water use.

• News Gathering

o Similar to movies and event photography , eac h news assignment may require a completely different shot or view of a scen e. With budgets for traditional helicopter use being greatly reduced, the s UAS is th e perfect solution to allow for easy news gathering for a fraction of the cost. The sUAS can and will be operated in a sterile area away from the public, w hile the traditional helicopter must hover over persons and property increasing the danger to individ uals.

• Construction and First Responders

o Low level oblique photos and video from several angles are far more effective than ground based imagery for displaying the characteristics of large, complex properties with several buildings and large trees. The applicants in the past have chartered 2

- seat full

sized helicopters for this purpose, which has proven more costly than many potential clients have been able to afford. The benefits of reduced cost and improved quality of presentation from the UA will be v aluable to and benefit many buyers and sellers of real property. Additionally, we request that we be allowed to use our system to benefit first responders nearby who might require assistance, including fire fighters, the police, the sheriff, et al., while remaining subject to all limitations cited in this application.

• Real Estate

o The sUAS can be used in all areas of rea l estate, including commercial, residential and industrial properties. Using a sUAS , real estate professionals can create promotional videos, photos and unique s hots that normal camera aspects cannot capture. NWAP ’s easy

- to

- use video and ph oto platform s enable properties to stand out, providing dazzling views that ar e typically shown via expensive computer animation or costly helicopter rentals. Imagine shooting a view from a high

- rise condo in stunning high definition tha t shows your potential customer the actualNorthWest Aerial Perspectives

9 | Page

– NWAP Exemption Request April 30 , 2015 view from the residence. The r emote platform is great for new planning, zoning and large developments. S imple and easy

- to

- use video and photos allow for multiple height pictures and elevation views.

VII. Privacy NorthWest Aerial Perspectives is deeply committed to protect ing public privacy. NWAP knows that many individual s have concerns about privacy from the operations of sUAS’s. NWAP has created a privacy notice that informs residents, commercial property owners, churches, schools, and governmental organizations of our intent to conduct commercial drone operations in proximity to their property.

VIII. Federal Registry Summary Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal Register, should it be determined that publication is needed:

NorthWest Aerial Perspectives , seeks an exemption from the following rules:

14 C.F.R. Part 21 14 C.F.R. 45. 23 (b) 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) and (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a) 14 C.F.R. 91.9 (b) (2) 14 C.F.R. 91.109 14 C.F.R. 91.119 14 C.F.R. 91.121Page 3 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a) 14 C.F.R. 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.205 (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.215 14 C.F.R. (91.401

- 91.417)

Approval of this exemption request allows NWAP to conduct commercial operations with small and lightweight unmanned aerial systems. NWAP ’s singular vision is to enhance safety of sUAS operations in the NAS while reducing risk to the general public and prop erty owners.

T he SynDrone , the Phantom 2 and Gemini sUAS, each weighing less than 30 pounds and powered by batteries, eliminates virtually all of that risk given the reduced mass and absence of combustible fuel carried on b o ard. The sUAS is transported to the designated mission area and set up there. The sUAS will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights.

The operation of this small UAS will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested herein, including exempting the applicant from the requirements of several regulations and allowing commercial operations. These lightweight sUAS’s operate at slow speeds, close to the ground, and in a steri le environment. As a result, they are far safer than conventional aerial survey and inspection operations conducted with fixed wing aircraft or helicopters.NorthWest Aerial Perspectives

10 | Page

– NWAP Exemption Request April 30 , 2015 If additional information is required, or if you have any questions regarding this Petition for Ex emption, please contact the undersigned at:

IX. Conclusion The petitioner is requesting this exemption for the purposes of aerial surveying
, precision agriculture
, real estate photography, aerial filmmaking and photography
, construction site inspections and monitoring
, news gathering and other flight operations . The reason for such a general and broad based request is that the petitioner wishes to utilize a business strategy of horizontal integration and maximize economies o f scope in order to capitalize on opportunities as they may arise in the future without the long turnaround time associated with additional exemptions. The petitioner's business model is based on the idea of offering ad hoc small UAS services to individual s or companies who wish to employ these services as a safe, effective, and legal option to enhance their business or hobby. The petitioner’s own market research shows pent up demand for these services currently exists in the real estate market , constructio n, movie

- making, and other markets are just beginning to emerge. The petitioner has identified U niversities and other agencies that could benefit from the operation requested in this application. A quick internet search will show that many are currently o perating similar UAS in exactly this fashion without, it is assumed, FAA authorization. The petitioner has refrained from engaging in commercial use of the UAS. The primary purpose of seeking this exemption is to obtain the capability to offer those servic es while remaining in c ompliance. The petitioner has 20 years of experience in the radio control model aircraft hobby

With Best Regards,

Thomas Ethen, President NorthWest Aerial Perspectives Office: (509) 733

- 2928 Email: teimages@sbcglobal.net