alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the quarterly report on Form
10-Q, (the Report), of SunCom Wireless, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, Michael E. Kalogris, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael E. KalogrisName:

Michael E. KalogrisTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 13, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
# Disposition Services contract supports Better Buying Power goals  

/ Published May 5, 2015
BATTLE CREEK, Michigan, A hazardous waste disposal contract awarded in January is an example of how DLA Disposition Services supports Better Buying Power by promoting competition and improving tradecraft in acquisition through increased small-business participation.  The long-term, $8.2 million contract was the result of a competitive solicitation and went to Tri-State Government Services, a woman-owned small business located in Chattanooga, Tennessee. The contract provides disposal of a variety of hazardous wastes for Defense Department customers around Jacksonville, Florida.  It also provides services such as testing and the handling of retrograded waste from Puerto Rico.  Contracting Officer Sarah Rutkowski said the robust competition for the contract came primarily from market research. She said a sources sought announcement in Federal Business Opportunities paid off “as eight small businesses submitted responsive proposals this time around, and offers were very competitive.”  A reverse auction to further support effective competition was held, according to DLA Disposition Services Acquisition Director Tracy Hart.  She said that approach resulted in a cost avoidance of $525,000.Sheryl Woods, Disposition Services’ special assistant for small business, expressed appreciation for the efforts of  small businesses that provide hazardous waste disposal support to warfighters.  She said that in addition to providing environmental stewardship for the armed services, the effort is vital to unit and base commanders who can be held personally accountable for how hazardous waste is stored and handled.All DLA Disposition Services service contracts for transportation, removal and disposal of hazardous waste for military units and bases are executed via individual task orders. Hart said that as DoD’s designated hazardous waste disposal provider, Disposition Services issues around 6,000 task orders a year, with an average of 160,000 items per order.  Hart said that the people handling disposal contracts know how critical they are for military customers.  “As a result, it’s ingrained in the staff’s culture to provide quick turnaround on task order requests,” she said.  The result is that DLA Disposition Services beats overall DLA goals on how long it takes to issue a task order by a wide margin.  The quick issuance of individual task orders also reduces cycle times for the overall process, another BBP 3.0 goal, Hart said. Editor’s note: This is part of a series of articles that DLA will highlight on BBP 3.0 called "Better Buying Power in Focus."
No. 10-6332.

#### Rodney Karl Blackwell, Petitioner v. Luella York.

562 U.S. 1046, 131 S. Ct. 599,

178 L. Ed. 2d 438,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8995.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-211.

#### Transocean Enterprise, Inc., Petitioner v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.

562 U.S. 962, 131 S. Ct. 473,

178 L. Ed. 2d 289,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8067.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.

Same case below, 33 So. 3d 459.
# “Great ShakeOut” at DLA Distribution Hill reinforces emergency preparedness

/ Published May 24, 2016
HILL, Utah, 
In late April, the Utah Division of Emergency Management conducted the Great Utah ShakeOut, an emergency drill to exercise the potential of a 7.5-magnitued earthquake anticipated for the Wasatch Front.  In connection with the Great Utah ShakeOut, Hill Air Force Base and Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Hill conducted an “exercise week,” with drills practicing an increase to the Force Protection Conditions, shelter-in-place, active shooter scenarios, and additional natural and man-made disaster scenarios facing those who live and work within the area.   

Since DLA Distribution is a huge component on Hill Air Force Base, the site seized the opportunity to participate.  “This was a great opportunity to train and exercise our people for the threats we face every day,” said Andrew Konrady, director of the distribution center.  

During the week long exercise, Ray Ross, the antiterrorism officer and emergency manager to DLA at Ogden, conducted multiple events for all the DLA components on Hill Air Force Base.  DLA at Ogden consists of DLA Aviation, Distribution, Information Operations, Documents Services, Dispositions, Environmental and Energy.  

Ross and his team of emergency managers for each of the DLA components stood-up and managed the Unit Control Center, executed FPCON CHARLIE measures (the highest security measure), and conducted drop, cover and hold-on exercises associated with the projected 7.5-magnatude earthquake.  

In the event of an earthquake, drop, cover, and hold means to “drop” to the ground, take “cover” by getting under a sturdy desk or table, and “hold” on until the shaking stops.  If there isn’t a table or desk nearby, personnel should drop to the ground in an inside corner of the building and cover the head and neck with hands and arms.   Employees are encouraged to not try to run to another room and to just to get under a table.  

“This week of major events tested how employees and emergency personnel would respond as if in real life,” said Konrady.  “We tested our DLA Distribution Hill personnel to the fullest, and they rose to the occasion with 100 percent participation.”

During the week’s events, Hill Air Force Base conducted a communication outage.  “The COMM OUT provided a great opportunity for DLA at Ogden to develop and maintain information flow from affected areas to emergency and first responders, as well as gave us a chance to review and update the Continuity of Operations Plan,” said Ross.  

Active shooter drills, a shelter-in-place exercise, and evacuation procedures were also practiced.  By the end of the week, more than 700 DLA at Ogden employees had the opportunity to test their response in the event of both natural and man-made disasters. 

“I am pleased that employees practiced the exercise as if it were real, and applied the appropriate measures for each scenario,” concluded Konrady.
#### M.D. Morris, Appellant, v Cutting Motors, Inc., Respondent.

[770 NYS2d 215]

Spain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Rowley, J.), entered July 23, 2002, which, inter alia, reversed an order of the City Court of the City of Ithaca denying defendant’s motion to set aside the jury verdict.

*1245This is a breach of contract action premised on the following facts. Plaintiff purchased a used vehicle from defendant in September 1998. In March 2000, after experiencing a number of problems with the vehicle, plaintiff returned the vehicle to defendant and requested a credit for its purchase price ($10,754) toward a comparable vehicle, and defendant agreed to look for such a vehicle. No written agreement was executed. Plaintiff left the vehicle, its keys and title documents with defendant and defendant removed its plates and returned them to the Department of Motor Vehicles to be held for plaintiff in escrow. After several months, defendant had not produced a vehicle for plaintiff, prompting plaintiff, in August 2000, to purchase a vehicle from another dealer and then demand that plaintiff pay him the original purchase price. When defendant refused, plaintiff commenced this action for breach of an oral agreement, seeking $10,754 in damages.

A trial was held in Ithaca City Court resulting in a jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor. On defendant’s appeal, County Court reversed and dismissed the claim on statute of frauds grounds. Plaintiff appeals. Because we agree with County Court that the statute of frauds bars plaintiffs claim as a matter of law, we affirm.

The UCC governs this matter and, thus, the alleged oral contract is unenforceable unless one of several exceptions applies to the general requirement that contracts for the sale of goods valued at over $500 be in writing *(see*UCC 2-201). Here, plaintiff relies on UCC 2-201 (3) (c), which provides an exception to the writing requirement where the goods “have been received and accepted” (UCC 2-201 [3] [c]). Plaintiff argues that defendant “accepted” the car by acting in a manner “inconsistent with [plaintiffs] ownership” (UCC 2-606 [1] [c]). We cannot agree. A review of the record reveals no evidence of any act by defendant demonstrating an intention by defendant to resume ownership of the vehicle but, rather, supports the conclusion that defendant was holding the vehicle entirely for plaintiffs convenience and at no benefit to itself, until a trade could be worked out *(cf. Gem Source Intl. v Gem-Works N.S., L.L.C.,*258 AD2d 373, 374 [1999], *lv dismissed*93 NY2d 999 [1999]; *Sears, Roebuck & Co. v Galloway,*195 AD2d 825, 826 [1993]). Likewise, plaintiffs contention on appeal that he actually signed the certificate of title to the vehicle, thereby legally transferring ownership to defendant, is completely without any testimonial or documentary support in the record. Accordingly, as no exception to the statute of frauds applies, the alleged oral contract is unenforceable as a matter of law.

*1246Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-165628 and No. 333-157602 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements No. 333-162109, 333-152639, 333-134512, 333-97903, 333-91458, 333-62404, and 333-55438 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 22, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of CoBiz Financial Inc. and Subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of CoBiz Financial Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoBiz Financial Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 
| /s/   Deloitte & Touche LLP |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Denver,   Colorado                   |   |
| February 22,   2011             |   |

 

----
Exhibit No. 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 2 for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ronald W. Jibson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR CORPORATION   September 19, 2011 /s/Ronald W. Jibson Ronald W. Jibson President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Patch  International,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Michael S. Vandale,  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal  Executive
and Financial Officer) of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


/s/ MICHAEL S. VANDALE
---------------------------------------------
Michael S. Vandale
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Thomas, Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 788]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Carruthers, J.), rendered December 16, 2015, unanimously affirmed.

Although we find that defendant did not make a valid waiver of the right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.
# DLA Distribution employees presented commander’s coins

/ Published July 8, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Distribution Commanding Officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ presented coins to several DLA Distribution headquarters employees at a recent recognition event. Yuna Kocharova was recognized for handling all things Defense Travel System, government travel card, Eagle Cash, government purchase card and assisting command with human resource actions. With DTS, there are many mandatory audit requirements and reports with hard deadlines. Kocharova has made herself available to straighten out travel issues around the clock.Jenny Cook also received a coin and serves as the distribution force provider ensuring all JLOC and J3 requirements are met, and that all well-trained individuals are equipped to accomplish all missions. Maj. Dustin Gilfoil arrived in May as part of Operation Warfighter, Gilfoil received a coin for the immediate contributions he made to Distribution’s strategic mission. He was assigned to work the memorandum of agreement between DLA Distribution and U.S. Army Africa for operations in Djibouti and accomplished this goal despite many challenges. Elaine Deleon was recognized for always responding to requests for information regarding policy. Deleon provides concise and understandable responses to inquiries from customers while taking on difficult and complex projects without hesitation.Mr. Ronald Bell, DLA Distribution’s Ombudsman to industry, received a coin for being vital to the success of DLA Distribution’s Industry Engagement Plan, including the 2nd Industry Day event held on June 11-12. As the coordinator, he was responsible for all of the logistics, support personnel, agenda, briefers, invitations, etc. in support of the two-day event.Rex Temple received a coin for contributing immensely to the Global Weight and Cube program. His efforts are greatly reducing the backlog of data. His efforts exemplify both initiative and a focus on process improvements.Thanks to all these employees for their efforts as part of the DLA Distribution team.
```

[Federal Register: April 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 77)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 20942]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22ap10-16]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2005-NM-0007; FRL-9140-1]

 
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
New Mexico; Transportation Conformity Requirement for Bernalillo County

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the New Mexico State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) at New Mexico Administrative Code 20.11.3, 
concerning transportation conformity rules for Bernalillo County, New 
Mexico. The plan revision is intended to ensure consistency with 
amendments to the federal Transportation Conformity Rule. These plan 
revisions meet statutory and regulatory requirements, and are 
consistent with EPA's guidance.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before May 24, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Please see the related direct final rule, which is located 
in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, for 
detailed instructions on how to submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Riley, Air Planning Section 
(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone 214-665-8542; fax number 
214-665-7263; e-mail address riley.jeffrey@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document proposes to take action on SIP 
revisions submitted by the Governor of New Mexico on behalf of the 
Albuquerque Environmental Health Department. We have published a direct 
final rule approving the State's SIP revisions in the ``Rules and 
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register because we view this as 
a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. We have 
explained our reasons for this action in the preamble to the direct 
final rule.
    If we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action 
on this proposed rule. If we receive adverse comment, we will withdraw 
the direct final rule and it will not take effect. We would address all 
public comments in any subsequent final rule based upon this proposed 
rule.
    We do not intend to institute a second comment period on this 
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. 
For further information, please see the information provided in the 
ADDRESSES section of this document.

    Dated: April 9, 2010.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2010-9197 Filed 4-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
# 2022 DLA Hall of Fame inductee: Kathryn Fantasia

/ Published Aug. 10, 2022
Fort Belvoir, VA, 
*Editor’s Note: This is one of six stories featuring 2022 DLA Hall of Fame inductees. A ceremony highlighting their contributions to the agency will be held Aug. 17 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex.*

Kathryn Fantasia, former head of direct delivery fuels for Defense Logistics Agency Energy, is a member of the 2022 DLA Hall of Fame.

Fantasia began her 23-year career at DLA in 1991 as a GS-3 with the Defense Fuel Supply Center. Moving up the ranks, she became a division chief and contracting officer in Direct Delivery Fuels from 2000 to 2006. From 2006 to 2007, she served as the contracting director for the bulk petroleum.

Fantasia was the director of DLA Energy’s Direct Delivery Fuels Directorate from April 2007 to her retirement in 2014. She provided contracting advice to all levels of the organization and advocated for major reforms that changed the way DLA Energy conducts business. She managed acquisition programs worth over $2 billion in annual sales that support military and federal ground fuel requirements around the world.

In addition, she was named the executive advisor to the commander in 2011. This position was the senior ranking GS-15 position among more than 20 GS-15s throughout the organization.

“Fantasia was hand-selected for this post because of her demonstrated leadership, exceptional business acumen, sage insight of the DLA Energy business, and effective ability to turn requirements and challenges into success and mission accomplishment,” according to her nomination.

She created fuel solutions for U.S. forces in Operation Enduring Freedom by establishing relationships with new vendors in remote areas and arranged fuel supplies for devastated locations after earthquakes and hurricanes.

“As an expert contracting professional highly regarded by her peers and colleagues, Fantasia was continuously sought after for her expertise and mentorship in building a top-quality contracting team within DLA Energy,” according to her nomination. “The confidence and empowerment she instilled in her team continues to be the foundation for successful mentoring to this day. Many of the leaders currently holding positions within DLA Energy were former employees/leaders under Fantasia and were recognized as outstanding under her tenure.”

Fantasia was named to the DLA Energy Hall of Fame in 2018.
No. 10-312.

#### La Union Del Pueblo Entero, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Emergency Management Agency.

562 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 525,

178 L. Ed. 2d 407,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8358.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 608 F.3d 217.
No. 10-6013.

#### Dale Mardis, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 943, 131 S. Ct. 365,

178 L. Ed. 2d 236,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7493.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 600 F.3d 693.