Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search

		Submit


Smoking & Tobacco Use


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home








Smokefree Policies Improve Health										Related Pages
										Smokefree Policy HomeSmokefree Policy Fact SheetsSmokefree Policies Do Not Hurt the Hospitality Industry
Smokefree Policies Improve Air Quality in Hospitality Settings
**Smokefree Policies Improve Health**
Smokefree Policies Receive Public Support
Smokefree Policies Reduce Secondhand Smoke Exposure
Smokefree Policies Reduce Smoking
Smokefree Policies Result in High Levels of Compliance
Ventilation Does Not Effectively Protect People Who Don’t Smoke from Secondhand SmokeExposure to secondhand smoke from burning tobacco products causes disease and premature death among people who do not smoke.1 There is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke, and even brief exposure can cause immediate harm.1 Studies have shown that smokefree laws that prohibit smoking in public places like bars and restaurants help improve the health of workers and the general population.1-17 Some of these improvements in health outcomes, such as reductions in hospital admissions for heart attacks, begin to be realized shortly after the laws take effect.1–5 Smokefree laws also can make it easier for people who smoke to quit, reducing their risk of disease.Scientific ReviewsHospitality Workers’ Health
In 2009, a report by the International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that there is sufficient evidence (the highest level of evidence under the report’s rating scale) that implementation of smokefree legislation decreases respiratory symptoms in workers.4
In 2009, a report by the International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that there is strong evidence (the second highest level of evidence under the report’s rating scale) that implementation of smokefree legislation causes a decline in heart disease morbidity.4
In 2010, a report by the Institute of Medicine concluded that there is a causal relationship between smokefree laws and decreases in acute coronary events, although the report was unable to estimate the magnitude of this association.5
In 2010, a Cochrane review of 12 studies found consistent evidence of a reduction in hospital admissions for cardiac events following implementation of smokefree laws.6
In 2010, a meta-analysis of 17 studies of the effect of smokefree laws on acute coronary events reported a pooled estimate of relative risk of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.86 to 0.94) and concluded that a large body of evidence exists supporting a reduction in acute coronary events following the implementation of smokefree laws, with the effect increasing over time.7
In 2012, a random-effects meta-analysis of 45 studies of 33 smokefree laws with a median follow-up of 24 months (range: 2–57 months) found that comprehensive smokefree laws were associated with lower rates of hospital admissions or deaths for:
Coronary events (relative risk: 0.848)
Other heart disease (relative risk: 0.610)
Cerebrovascular accidents (relative risk: 0.840)
Respiratory disease (relative risk: 0.760)The difference in risk did not change with longer follow-up. More comprehensive laws were associated with larger decreases in risk.8Selected Studies: Hospitality Workers’ HealthStudies on hospitality workers’ health
Studies in:
Found that:
Was associated with:Scotland (2006)9
Implementing a comprehensive national smokefree law prohibiting smoking in all indoor areas of workplaces, restaurants, and bars
Rapid (within 2 months) improvements in a number of health outcomes in nonsmoking bar workers, including:
Reductions in respiratory symptoms, like coughing, wheezing, and shortness of breath
Reductions in sensory symptoms, like eye and throat irritations and runny nose
improvements in lung function
Reductions in inflammation or swelling of airways
Improved quality of life among bar employees with asthmaIreland (2007)10
Implementing a comprehensive national smokefree law prohibiting smoking in all indoor areas of workplaces, restaurants, and bars
Improvements in the respiratory health of nonsmoking bar workers, including:
Improvements in lung function
Reductions in coughing and phlegm production
Reductions in sensory symptoms, like eye and throat irritationsSelected Studies: Population Health—Acute Coronary EventsStudies on population health regarding coronary events
Studies in:
Found that:
Was associated with:New York (2007)11
Implementing a comprehensive state smokefree law prohibiting smoking in all indoor areas of workplaces, restaurants, and bars
An 8% reduction in hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction in 2004, the year after the state smokefree law took effect, accounting for 3,813 fewer admission and $56 million in savings on hospital costsScotland (2008)12
Implementing a comprehensive national smokefree law prohibiting smoking in all indoor areas of workplaces, restaurants, and bars
Improvements in the respiratory health of nonsmoking bar workers, including:
A 17% reduction in hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome, compared with a 4% reduction in England, which had no national smokefree law at this point
Admissions falling by 21% among people who have never smoked, , 19% among people who used to smoke, and 14% among those who currently smokeSelected Studies: Population Health—AsthmaStudies on population health regarding asthma
Studies in:
Found that:
Was associated with:Scotland (2010)13
Implementing a comprehensive national smokefree law prohibiting smoking in all indoor areas of workplaces, restaurants, and bars
An average reduction of 18.2% per year in the rate of hospital admissions for asthma in children aged < 15 years relative to the rate on the date the law took effectEngland (2013)14
Implementing a comprehensive national smokefree law prohibiting smoking in all indoor areas of workplaces, restaurants, and bars
Improvements in the respiratory health of nonsmoking bar workers, including:
A significant immediate change of -8.9% in the emergency hospital admission rate of children aged ≤ 14 years with a principal diagnosis of asthma
6,802 fewer admissions in the first 3 years after the law took effectSelected Studies: Population Health—Multiple OutcomesStudies on population health regarding multiple outcomes
Studies in:
Found that:
Was associated with:Arizona (2011)15
Implementing a comprehensive state smokefree law prohibiting smoking in all indoor areas of workplaces, restaurants, and bars
Reductions in monthly hospital admissions for heart attacks, angina, stroke, and asthma in counties with no municipal or county smokefree laws predating the state law compared with counties with such laws.United States
(2012)16
Implementing state or local smokefree laws in workplaces, restaurants, and/or bars covering 50% or more of county’s population
Substantial health improvement among Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years, including:
A 20-21% decrease in hospital admission rates for acute myocardial infarctions (heart attacks)
An 11% reduction in hospital admission rates for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseUnited States
(2012)17
Implementing comprehensive smokefree laws covering workplaces, restaurants, and bars in 387 U.S. counties between January 2000 and December 2007
A decrease in heart attack admissions among Medicare enrollees in the 12 months after the smokefree law took effect*
**Note: There was a reduction in the strength of the association after pre-existing declines in cardiovascular disease were taken into account.*ReferencesU.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2006 [accessed 2014 May 12].
Hahn EJ. Smoke-free Legislation: A Review of Health and Economic Outcomes Research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2010;39(6S1):S66–S76 [cited 2014 May 12].
Goodman PG, Haw S, Kabir Z, Clancy L. Are There Health Benefits Associated With Comprehensive Smoke-Free Laws?. International Journal of Public Health 2009; 54:367–78 [cited 2014 May 12].
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, Tobacco Control, Vol. 13: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Smoke-Free Policies [PDF–2.67 MB]. Lyon, France: WHO, 2009 [accessed 2014 May 12].
Institute of Medicine. Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Cardiovascular Effects: Making Sense of the Evidence. Washington: The National Academies Press, 2010 [accessed 2014 May 12].
Callinan JE, Clarke A, Doherty K, and Kelleher C. Legislative Smoking Bans for Reducing Secondhand Smoke Exposure, Smoking Prevalence and Tobacco Consumption (Review). [accessed 2014 May 12].
Mackay DF, Irfan MO, Haw S, Pell JP. Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Comprehensive Smoke-Free Legislation on Acute Coronary Events. Heart 2010;96:1525–30 [cited 2014 May 12].
Tan CE, Glantz SA. Association Between Smoke-Free Legislation and Hospitalizations for Cardiac, Cerebrovascular, and Respiratory Diseases: A Meta-Analysis. Circulation 2012;126:2177–83 [cited 2014 May 12].
Menzies D, Nair A, Williamson PA, Schembri S, Al-Khairalla MZH, Barnes M, et al. Respiratory Symptoms, Pulmonary Function, and Markers of Inflammation Among Bar Workers Before and After a Legislative Ban on Smoking in Public Places. Journal of the American Medical Association 2006;296(14):1742–8 [cited 2014 May 12].
Goodman P, Agnew M, McCaffrey M, Paul G, Clancy L. Effects of the Irish Smoking Ban on Respiratory Health of Bar Workers and Air Quality in Dublin Pubs. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2007;175(8):840–5 [cited 2014 May 12].
Juster HR, Loomis BR, Hinman TM, Farrelly MC, Hyland A, Bauer UE, Birkhead GS. Declines in Hospital Admissions for Acute Myocardial Infarction in New York State After Implementation of a Comprehensive Smoking Ban. American Journal of Public Health 2007;97(11):2035-39 [cited 2014 May 12].
Pell JP, Haw S, Cobbe S, Newby DE, Pell ACH, Fischbacher C, et al. Smoke-Free Legislation and Hospitalizations for Acute Coronary Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;359:482–91 [cited 2014 May 12].
Mackay D, Haw S, Ayres JG, Fischbacher C, Pell JP. Smoke-Free Legislation and Hospitalizations for Childhood Asthma. New England Journal of Medicine 2010;363:1139–45 [cited 2014 May 12].
Millett C, Lee JT, Laverty AA, Glantz SA, Majeed A. Hospital Admissions for Childhood Asthma After Smoke-Free Legislation in England. Pediatrics 2013;131(2):e485–e501 [cited 2014 May 12].
Herman PM, Walsh ME. Hospital Admissions for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Angina, Stroke, and Asthma After Implementation of Arizona’s Comprehensive Statewide Smoking Ban. American Journal of Public Health 2011;101(3):491–-496 [cited 2014 May 12].
Barr CD, Diez DM, Wang Y, Dominici F, Samet JM. Comprehensive Smoking Bans and Acute Myocardial Infarction Among Medicare Enrollees in 387 US Counties: 1999–-2008. American Journal of Epidemiology 2012;176(7):642–-648 [cited 2014 May 12].
Vander Weg MW, Rosenthal GE, Sarrazin MV. Smoking Bans Linked to Lower Hospitalizations for Heart Attacks and Lung Disease Among Medicare Beneficiaries. Health Affairs 2012;31(12):2699–2707 [cited 2014 May 12].Top of Page
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  November 30, 2021						Source: 	Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeHomeOffice on Smoking and Health (OSH)plus iconOSH Partners with StatesFunding Opportunity AnnouncementsInteragency Committee on Smoking and Healthplus iconMembership RosterNewsroomStay ConnectedOrganizationSmoking & Tobacco Use FeaturesQuit Smokingplus iconHow to Quitplus iconBenefits of QuittingCessation Materials for Tobacco Control Programsplus iconNational Quitline Data WarehouseBasic Informationplus iconHealth Effectsplus iconCancerHeart Disease and StrokeChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Smoking During PregnancyEquality in Smoking & Disease: Nobody Wins!Electronic Cigarettesplus iconAbout Electronic Cigarettes (E-Cigarettes)Quick Facts on the Risks of E-cigarettes for Kids, Teens, and Young AdultsMenthol Tobacco Productsplus iconMenthol Tobacco Products are a Public Health ProblemMenthol Smoking and Related Health DisparitiesAddressing Menthol Tobacco ProductsHeated Tobacco ProductsPolicy and Legislationplus iconLegislationRegulationYouth Tobacco PreventionRelated ResourcesCommercial Tobacco and Health Equityplus iconBlack and African American Peopleplus iconHealth BurdenUnfair and Unjust Practices and ConditionsSecondhand SmokeQuitting TobaccoAmerican Indian and Alaska Native Peopleplus iconHealth BurdenUnfair and Unjust Practices and ConditionsSecondhand SmokeQuitting TobaccoAsian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Peopleplus iconHealth BurdenUnfair and Unjust Practices and ConditionsQuitting TobaccoHispanic and Latino Peopleplus iconHealth BurdenUnfair and Unjust Practices and ConditionsSecondhand SmokeQuitting TobaccoLGBTQ+ Peopleplus iconHealth BurdenUnfair and Unjust Practices and ConditionsQuitting TobaccoPeople Across Geographic Regionsplus iconHealth BurdenUnfair and Unjust Practices and ConditionsSecondhand SmokeQuitting TobaccoPeople with Behavioral Health Conditionsplus iconHealth BurdenUnfair and Unjust Practices and ConditionsCommercial Tobacco Product Use and Behavioral Health Conditions can Affect Each OtherQuitting TobaccoPeople with Low Socioeconomic Statusplus iconHealth BurdenUnfair and Unjust Practices and ConditionsSecondhand SmokeQuitting TobaccoSecondhand Smokeplus iconGeneral InformationTrends and DisparitiesHealth ProblemsSecondhand Smoke in the CommunitySecondhand Smoke in the HomeSmokefree PoliciesResourcesGoing Smokefree Mattersplus iconBars and RestaurantsCasinosIn Your HomeMultiunit HousingSurgeon General's Reports on Smoking and Tobacco Useplus icon2020 SGR—Smoking Cessation2016 SGR—E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young AdultsHistorical ReportsA Brief HistoryArchiveData and Statisticsplus iconFast Facts and Fact Sheetsplus icon**Smoking and Cigarettes**Diseases and DeathHealth Effects of Cigarette SmokingTobacco-Related MortalityCigarette Smoking in the U.S.Adult DataCessationCost and ExpendituresEconomics**Smokeless Tobacco**Health EffectsProducts and MarketingSmokeless Tobacco Product Use in the United States**Other Tobacco Products**CigarsHookahsBidis and KreteksLow Yield Cigarettes**Secondhand Smoke****Youth Tobacco Use**Youth DataSmoking in the MoviesTrends in Tobacco Use Among Youth**Tobacco Industry**Tobacco Brand PreferencesIndustry MarketingSurveysplus iconNational Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS)Alaska Native Adult Tobacco Survey Guidance ManualAmerican Indian Adult Tobacco SurveyScientific Evidence BriefsSTATE SystemMorbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports (MMWR)Vital SignsPatient Careplus iconPatient Care Settings and Smoking Cessationplus iconCardiovascular Care SettingsRespiratory Care SettingsCancer Care SettingsMaternal and Infant Care SettingsClinical Interventions to Treat Tobacco Use and Dependence Among AdultsClinical Cessation ToolsPatient Cessation MaterialsQuitlines and Other Cessation Support ResourcesClinical Education and TrainingE-Cigarettes and Patient CareState and Community Workplus iconTobacco Control Programsplus iconNetworking2Save: Co-op AgreementGuidelines and ResourcesProgram FundingPrograms in Actionplus iconAlabama in ActionIndiana in ActionKentucky in ActionNebraska in ActionNew York in ActionWest Virginia in ActionPromising Policies And Practices To Address Tobacco Use By Persons With Mental And Substance Use DisordersEvidence Based Guides for StatesState Fact SheetsTobacco Ingredient and Nicotine Reportingplus iconDescription of the LawsReporting InstructionsFederal Register NoticesLegal RequirementsFrequently Asked QuestionsKey TermsRecommended FormatsTobacco Counter-Marketing CampaignGlobal Tobacco Controlplus iconAbout GTSSThe GATS AtlasMultimedia & Toolsplus iconMedia Campaign Resource Center (MCRC)InfographicsShareable MediaPublication Catalog


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue