alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Distribution’s Weaver named the 2021 GDE Acquisition Workforce Individual Achievement award winner

/ Published Dec. 16, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Jada Weaver, the supervisory contract specialist at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution headquarters, was named the 2021 Global Distribution Excellence Acquisition Workforce Individual Achievement award winner.

Weaver’s major job responsibilities include overseeing a team of contract specialists and supervisory contract specialists and acting as a contracting officer. Her team procures and administers large, complex, and high visibility distribution and warehousing support service contracts for DLA Distribution and its customers.

Weaver was surprised that she was nominated for the award.

“I was shocked at first, but I am very grateful that efforts have been recognized,” she said. “This is really a team recognition award and they have worked extremely hard. It has been a tough couple of years with challenging requirements and new work and I think this is recognition of the team’s hard work and dedication. I am fortunate to have such intelligent and top-notch professionals who have incredible skills, knowledge and work whatever is needed to get the job done and share information to make things more efficient. We have amazing internal and external customers who focus on the mission, which helps our acquisitions run more smoothly.”

Weaver’s team has had a lot of new and changing requirements the past few years with the pandemic and was presented with new challenges to ensure support to all customers. The team has had a lot of pre-award efforts while working through unique post-award issues and complex close-out actions for incentive and cost contracts. They worked closely with their Defense Contract management Agency and Defense Contract Audit Agency counterparts to support rate finalization and contract incorporation in recent years and the team has excelled at addressing issues timely and balancing all the needs requested with it.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31623-31624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15481]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 510


Animal Drugs, Feeds, and Related Products; Change of Sponsor Name

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal 
drug regulations to reflect a change of sponsor name from Boehringer 
Ingelheim Animal Health, Inc., to Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 10, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. McKay, Center for Veterinary 
Medicine (HFV-102), Food and Drug

[[Page 31624]]

Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 301-827-0213.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Inc., 
2621 North Belt Hwy., St. Joseph, MO 65406, has informed FDA of a 
change of sponsor name to Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. 
Accordingly, the agency is amending 21 CFR 510.600(c)(1) and (c)(2) to 
reflect the change of sponsor name.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 510

    Administrative practice and procedure, Animal drugs, Labeling, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and 
redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 510 is 
amended as follows:

PART 510--NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

    1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 510 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 360b, 371, 379e.


Sec. 510.600  [Amended]

    2. Section 510.600 Names, addresses, and drug labeler codes of 
sponsors of approved applications is amended in the table in paragraph 
(c)(1) by removing the entry for ``Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, 
Inc.'' and by alphabetically adding a new entry for ``Boehringer 
Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.''; and in the table in paragraph (c)(2) in 
the entry for ``000010'' by removing the sponsor name ``Boehringer 
Ingelheim Animal Health, Inc.'' and adding in its place ``Boehringer 
Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.''

    Dated: May 22, 1998.
Andrew J. Beaulieu,
Acting Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for 
Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 98-15481 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
# OPM survey to launch early May

/ Published May 9, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
This week Defense Logistics Agency employees will begin receiving emails from the Office of Personnel Management prompting them to take the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. The links are legitimate, and employees are encouraged to take the 91-question survey.

The FEVS is an organizational climate survey that assesses how employees feel about their work experiences, organization and leadership. It is scheduled to run through June 23.

The government-wide survey is sent to all federal employees who have been at their current agency as of Nov. 30. Contractors, non-federal employees, foreign nationals and political appointees are not eligible.

        Look for the FEVS survey link in your inbox this week. The survey will come from EVDD@OPM.GOVDLA Culture Program Manager Shannon Lewis cautioned employees not to confuse the survey with DLA’s 2023 Culture and Climate Survey, which is expected to launch in late July.

“Feedback from both surveys helps us to be in line with the DLA Vision and provides the tools needed to improve our culture,” Lewis said.

The FEVS gives federal employees the chance to provide honest feedback that’s critical to creating effective, responsive agencies, OPM Director Kiran A. Ahuja said in an OPM memorandum to all federal agencies.

“Providing agencies with a reliable method for capturing and analyzing employee feedback, benchmarking successes, and identifying emerging opportunities and challenges is key to retaining the best employees and recruiting talented new hires into the federal government,” she said.

Feedback from the FEVS and DLA’s 2023 Culture and Climate Survey will help DLA measure items like job satisfaction and opinions on leadership. Lewis said results will help the agency build on strengths and address challenges.

The FEVS is one of the largest employee surveys in the country. In 2022, it was sent to 1.6 million employees. Over 500,000 responded, and DLA had a 26.4 % response rate.

OPM first administered FEVS in 2002 as the Federal Human Capital Survey and then again in 2004, 2006 and 2008. The FHCS was renamed the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey in 2010 and revised to focus more on actionable items and has been administered annually since.

Questions about the survey can be sent to EVDD@OPM.GOV
No. 10-6045.

#### Armando Rivera, Petitioner v. Ohio.

562 U.S. 970, 131 S. Ct. 478,

178 L. Ed. 2d 303,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8108.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Butler County, denied.
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John Moerman, Vice President & Controller of SunCom Wireless, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SunCom Wireless, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293] for the registrant and have:

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293]; 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and****

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and****

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 13, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16730]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: United States Enrichment Corporation.

SUBJECT: Board of Directors.

TIME AND DATE: 6:00 p.m., Friday, June 19, 1998.

PLACE: Telephonic meeting.

STATUS: The meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Privatization of the Corporation.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elizabeth Stuckle at 301/564-3399.

    Dated: June 18, 1998.
William H. Timbers, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-16730 Filed 6-18-98; 4:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 8720-01-M
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No. 201700102

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### NICHOLAS D. HATHEWAY Corporal (E

- 4 ) , U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________ Appe al from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Matthew J

. Kent , US MC. Convening Authority: Command ing General , Marine Corps Installations

- West, MCB, Camp Pendleton, CA

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation : Lieutenant Co lonel T. Enge, US MC

. For Appellant: Captain Armando A. Rodriguez

- Feo , JAGC , USN

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq

.

_________________________ Decided 11 July 2017

_________________________ Before M ARKS , R UGH , and J ONES , Appellate Military Ju dges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c)

.

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
No. 10-5789.

#### Nataska Howard, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 937, 131 S. Ct. 345,

178 L. Ed. 2d 224,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7202.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 978.
#### In the Matter of Carnelian Farms, LLC, et al., Respondents, v Village of Muttontown Building Department et al., Appellants.

[56 NYS3d 556]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (John M. Galasso, J.), entered September 13, 2016. The judgment granted a petition, filed pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Village of Muttontown Building Inspector requiring the petitioners to obtain an additional building permit.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The petitioners, Carnelian Farms, LLC, and Hunter’s Moon Farm, LLC, are the owner and lessee, respectively, of an approximately 60-acre commercial horse boarding and training facility. The facility was in the process of being renovated and upgraded to include an indoor riding arena and other site improvements, which had been approved by the Village of Mut-tontown Board of Trustees. The petitioners were in the process of widening and re-paving the driveway on the premises when the Village of Muttontown Building Inspector issued a stop work order on the basis that the petitioners had failed to obtain a permit for that work.

The petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding against the Incorporated Village of Muttontown and the Village of Muttontown Building Department, among others (hereinafter collectively the municipal parties), to review the determination by the Building Inspector that an additional building permit was required for the driveway work. The Supreme Court granted the petition and annulled the determination. The municipal parties appeal.

The standard of judicial review in this CPLR article 78 *848proceeding is whether the determination was made in violation of lawful procedure, was affected by an error of law, or was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion *(see*CPLR 7803 [3]; *Matter of Wilson v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev.,*145 AD3d 905, 907 [2016]). Here, the Building Inspector determined that the work being performed on the driveway, including the widening and re-paving of the driveway, required a separate building permit. While the petitioners contend that the driveway work was approved by the Village of Muttontown Board of Trustees and that the subject work was covered under a building permit issued with respect to the erection of the indoor riding arena and attached structure, the Building Inspector’s determination that an additional permit was necessary was not made in violation of lawful procedure, was not affected by an error of law, was not arbitrary and capricious, and did not constitute an abuse of discretion.

Accordingly, the petition should have been denied and the proceeding dismissed.

Rivera, J.P., Leventhal, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.
#### People v Forde

2d Dept: 140 AD3d 1085 (Queens)

denied 8/23/16 (Stein, J.)
Served: February 21, 2013 

In the matter of Scott Tice, FDMS NO. FAA-2013~0042 (previously designated as Case 

No. 2012NE700211) 

I hereby request that the proceeding be held in Minneapolis or in another location within 

reasonable proximity to my residence in northern Wisconsin. If that is not possible, I 

request that I be allowed to participate by telephone. 

RECEIVED 

Scott Tice MAR- 7 2013 

MEARlNG DOCKET
# C_2014159EN.01001101.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Poitiers (France) lodged on 25 October 2013 — criminal proceedings against Jean-Paul Grimal

(Case C-550/13)

2014/C 159/14

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Poitiers

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Jean-Paul Grimal

By Order of 19 March 2014, the Court (Tenth Chamber) declared the request for a preliminary ruling to be manifestly inadmissible.

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17092]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Combined Arts Panel Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Panel, Theater/Musical Theater, Section A 
(Creation & Presentation Category) to the National Council on the Arts 
will be held on July 27-31, 1998. The panel will meet from 9:30 a.m. to 
6:30 p.m. on July 27-29, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on July 30, and 
from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on July 31, in Room 714 at the Nancy Hanks 
Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C., 20506. A 
portion of this meeting, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on July 30, will 
be open to the public for a policy discussion on field issues and 
needs, Leadership initiatives, Millennium projects, and guidelines.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. 
on July 27-29, from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on July 30, and from 9:30 
a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on July 31, are for the purpose of Panel review, 
discussion, evaluation and recommendation on applications for financial 
assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities 
Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to 
the agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of 
the Chairman of May 14, 1998, these sessions will be closed to the 
public pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of 
Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and, if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal 
employee in attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, 
TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, 
National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C., 20506, or call 202/
682-5691.

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 98-17092 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
# DLA’s Pier awarded the Meritorious Civilian Service Award 

/ Published Nov. 2, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Michael Pier, of Defense Logistics Agency Human Resources Services, and customer account manager for DLA Distribution, is the recipient of the Meritorious Civilian Service Award.

DLA Distribution Deputy Commander, Perry L. Knight, pinned the medal on Pier in a short ceremony held during the command’s leadership summit Oct. 27.

His award citation states, “Pier served with great distinction as the DLA Distribution customer account manager in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, from 2017-2022. The innovations in human resources implemented by Pier during the COVID-19 pandemic enables DLA Distribution to optimize its global distribution system. His work provided DLA Distribution with its greatest resource: it’s people.

Pier created a significant and lasting impact on the organization and the military warfighters that DLA Distribution supports. The people he brought to DLA Distribution increased logistics excellence and maximized warfighting capability and efficiency. Through their hands, Pier touched thousands.”

Receiving the award was quite a surprise for Pier, who said, “It is an honor to receive this award. It is a great feeling to be valued by my customer and to see that my teams’ efforts have made an impact.”

Pier has been with DLA for 15 years and spent approximately 10 of those years serving DLA Distribution in varying roles. He’s been in a CAM role since October 2017.

“DLA Distribution provides HR [human resources] practitioners with variety and volume of work. I have learned so much working with this customer and the challenges presented, which in many ways are unique within DLA,” said Pier.Of his time with DLA Distribution, Pier said working during the initial COIVD-19 pandemic was the most challenging.

“Hands down, the absolute most difficult part of supporting the customer during the initial and enduring phases of the pandemic was ensuring information was shared. In the early days, things were changing hour to hour, and we had to ensure Distribution Command, down to the first line supervisors we aware of the changes so they could support their teams appropriately. These open lines of communication and partnership were essential to success.”

Pier’s next assignment will be strategic talent leader in the Office of Human Capital for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 1350 Certification of**

**the Chief Executive Officer**

I, James R. Bazet, the chief executive officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CobraElectronics Corporation for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information containedin the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.