alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, (the
Report), of Triton PCS, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, Michael E. Kalogris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Triton PCS, Inc. and will be retained by Triton PCS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Triton PCS, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
Exhibit 21.  Subsidiaries of the Registrant
  
  
<TABLE>
  
                                                             Percentage
                                       State  or country     of voting
                                            in which         securities
                                         incorporated          owned
<CAPTION>
  <S>                                    <S>                    <C>
  
  Registrant:
    Dravo Corporation                    Pennsylvania            --
  
  Subsidiaries of Dravo Corporation:
    Dravo Basic Materials
      Company, Inc.                      Alabama                100%
    Dravo Equipment Company              Delaware               100
    Dravo Lime Company                   Delaware               100
    Princeton Ridge, Inc.                New Jersey             100
  
  Subsidiary of Dravo Basic Materials
   Company, Inc.:
    Dravo Natural Resources Company     Delaware                50
  
  Subsidiary of Dravo Lime Company:
   Dravo Natural Resources Company      Delaware                50


</TABLE>


                              21-1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR T HA E L E NA C AR P I O G UE R R A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73638 A ge nc yN o. A 072- 118- 162 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a rthaE l e naC a rpi o G ue rr a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

th e B o a r do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e ope n pr oc e e di ngs ba s e d on i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of

c ouns e l . W e ha ve ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . R e v ie w in g f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , Si ng h v. 

# FI LED JU N 09 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 73638 2 G on zales , 41 6 F . 3d 10 06 , 10 09 (9th C i r. 20 05 ), w e grantthe pet i t i on for r evi ew a nd r e m a nd. T he B I A de c i de d thi s c a s e w i thoutthe be ne f i tof ourde c i s i on i n P erdo m o v. H older , in w h ic h w e r e m a n d e df o rth e a g e n c yto d e te rm in e “w h e th e rw o m e n in G uat em al a c on st i tut e apart i cul arsoci algrou p, and, i f s o, w hether [ pet i t i on er ] has dem on strat ed a f

ear of per se cut i on ” on accountof her m em bers hi p i n a prot ec t ed gr oup. 611 F . 3d 662, 669 ( 9th C i r . 2010) . A c c or di ngl y , w e gr antthe pe t i t i on f or r e v ie w a n dr e m a n dto th e B I A f o rf u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s . See IN S v. V en tu ra , 537 U . S . 12 , 16 (200 2) (percuri am ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
Exhibit 21.1

Earth Sciences, Inc.
Listing of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                    BENEFICIAL
                                    PERCENTAGE
NAME                                OWNERSHIP                   DESCRIPTION
----                                ---------                   -----------

Domestic Corporations and Entities
----------------------------------
<S>                                    <C>        <C>                               
ESI Chemicals, Inc. -                  100%       a dormant Colorado corporation
ESI Minerals, Inc. -                   100%       a dormant Colorado corporation
ADA-ES, Inc.                           100%       a Colorado corporation
ADA Environmental Solutions LLC        100%       a Colorado limited liability company

Foreign Corporations and Entities
---------------------------------
ESI Resources Limited -                100%       an Alberta, Canada private corporation
Earth Sciences Extraction Company      100%       an Alberta, Canada registered limited partnership 389337
Alberta Corp.                          100%       an Alberta, Canada private corporation
Recursos Minerales VENESI C.A. -       100%       a Venezuelan private corporation
Minera Antabari C.A.                    83%       a Venezuelan private corporation
Recursos Minerales ESIGEO C.A.          83%       a Venezuelan private corporation
Recursos Minerales Apicharai C.A.       83%       a Venezuelan private corporation
Recursos Minerales Manaima C.A.         83%       a Venezuelan private corporation
Recursos Minerales Mancai C.A.          83%       a Venezuelan private corporation
Recursos Minerales Cudiez C.A.          83%       a Venezuelan private corporation
Proyectos Y Asesorias GEO C.A.          67%       a Venezuelan private corporation

</TABLE>
No. 10-6575.

#### Koleowo Adeyemi Adesoye, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 991, 131 S. Ct. 439,

178 L. Ed. 2d 340,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8274.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 421.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ulysses Tompkins, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 496]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered October 14, 2014, as amended October 17, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 10 years, unanimously affirmed. Order, same court and Justice, entered on or about May 25, 2016, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.20 motion to set aside the sentence, seeking, among other things, a new determination of the length of the final order of protection, unanimously modified, on the law, the matter remanded for a new determination of the duration of the order, and otherwise affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The record as a whole establishes that the plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made. The circum*511stances of the plea were not coercive *(see People v Fiumefreddo,*82 NY2d 536, 544 [1993]), notwithstanding the fact that the court warned defendant that the plea offer would be revoked if not accepted within the 24-hour period given to defendant to consider it, “because defendant had already received an extensive opportunity to consider the strength of the People’s case and confer with counsel about the advisability of pleading guilty” *(see People v Luckey,*149 AD3d 414, 415 [1st Dept 2017], *lv denied*29 NY3d 1082 [2017]). The court’s discussion of defendant’s possible sentencing exposure was not coercive (see *People v Pagan,*297 AD2d 582 [1st Dept 2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 562 [2002]). Defendant received a reasonable opportunity to present all of his claims, and any claim of innocence was contradicted by his admissions during the plea. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims regarding the plea.

As the People concede, the expiration date of the order of protection is erroneous because it was calculated without taking jail time credit into account *(see People v Jackson,*121 AD3d 434 [1st Dept 2014]).

Concur — Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Webber and Oing, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16068]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73


Radio Broadcasting Services; Various Locations

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, on its own motion, editorially amends the 
Table of FM Allotments to specify the actual classes of channels 
allotted to various communities. The changes in channel classifications 
have been authorized in response to applications filed by licensees and 
permittees operating on these channels. This action is taken pursuant 
to Revision of Section 73.3573(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules 
Concerning the Lower Classification of an FM Allotment, 4 FCC Rcd 2413 
(1989), and the Amendment of the Commission's Rules to permit FM 
Channel and Class Modifications [Upgrades] by Applications, 8 FCC Rcd 
4735 (1993).

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 17, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, adopted May 29, 1998, and released June 5, 1998. The full 
text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and 
copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference 
Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete 
text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractors, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th 
Street, NW, Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-
3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Arizona, is 
amended by removing Channel 285C3 and adding Channel 285C2 at Willcox.
    3. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Iowa, is 
amended by removing Channel 298A and adding Channel 298C3 at Castana.
    4. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Missouri, is 
amended by removing Channel 260A and adding Channel 260C3 at Macon.
    5. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Oklahoma, is 
amended by removing Channel 295C1 and adding Channel 294C1 at Clinton.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-16068 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
No. 09-11102.

#### J. F., Petitioner v. South Dakota.

562 U.S. 862, 131 S. Ct. 142,

178 L. Ed. 2d 85,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6202.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Dakota denied.

Same case below, 789 N.W.2d 320.
July 29, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

A.N.A. ENTERPRISES, INC., MUSA ADI, ZUHAIR ADI, STEAKS R US, INC., 

TEXAS GULF COAST ENTERPRISE, INC., ADICO ENTERPRISES, INC. 

AND STAR SERVE, INC., Appellants

NO. 14-14-00321-CV V.

WALLIS STATE BANK, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on January 27, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, A.N.A. Enterprises, Inc., Musa Adi, Zuhair Adi, Steaks R Us, Inc., 

Texas Gulf Coast Enterprise, Inc., Adico Enterprises, Inc. and Star Serve, Inc..

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# Susquehanna’s Brooks named Employee of the Week

/ Published Feb. 19, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Marvin Brooks of DLA DistributionSusquehanna’s storage branch has been named Employee of the Week.

As the “person sought out forhelp in any situation,” Brooks isalways willing to assist new hires in navigating the difficult environment ofActive Bulk.He consistently displays the organizations value of respectfor people in his daily interactions with both peers and supervisors. 

Driven by his daily focus on thecustomer, Brooks provides the very best service to his internal and externalcustomers, and is always focused on audit readiness.He has passed all audits conducted byDistributions Future Operations team and supervisors. He reliably maintains thehighest earned standard hours for active bulk at a 9.0.

Recently, Brooks was involved ina senior management walkthrough concerning the voluntary protection program. Bywalking management through the process, he was able to produce a job hazardanalysis and answer all questions without reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DRAVO
CORPORATION'S DECEMBER 31, 1995 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            1086
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    26481
<ALLOWANCES>                                       934
<INVENTORY>                                      14194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 43072
<PP&E>                                          225835
<DEPRECIATION>                                  109667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  213261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            33307
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         15055
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            20000
<PREFERRED>                                         25
<OTHER-SE>                                       64775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    213261
<SALES>                                         146067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                146067
<CGS>                                           109541
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   109541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  11321
<INCOME-TAX>                                       340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              10981
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     10981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-6369.

#### In re Jeffrey Sanders, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1043, 131 S. Ct. 601,

178 L. Ed. 2d 455,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8890,

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
#### People v Howell

1st Dept: 139 AD3d 484 (Bronx)

denied 8/15/16 (Fahey, J.)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2624 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 

on the deduction for State and local taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2019 

Ms. SHERRILL (for herself, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. CISNEROS, and Mr. KING of 

New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitation on the deduction for State and local taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SALT Relief and Mar5 riage Penalty Elimination Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR 

7 STATE AND LOCAL TAXES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 164(b)(6)(B) of the Inter9 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘$10,000 ($5,000 in the case of a married individual filing 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2624 IH

1 a separate return)’’ and inserting ‘‘an amount equal to 

2 the basic standard deduction in effect with respect to the 

3 taxpayer for the taxable year under paragraph (2) of sec4 tion 63(c) (determined after the application of paragraph 

5 (7) and without regard to paragraphs (5) and (6) of such 

6 section)’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

9 December 31, 2018. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# 2023 DLA Hall of Fame inductees announced

/ Published April 3, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic has announced inductees into the 2023 DLA Hall of Fame.

“The DLA Hall of Fame recognizes former DLA civilian and military team members who made significant and lasting contributions to this agency and its mission and represent the core DLA values and ideals we strive to uphold today,” she said in a memo to DLA senior leaders.

Inductees are:
      - Kay Bushman, former senior counsel, DLA Energy.
      - Alma Charles, former Supplier Operations Division chief, Aviation Commodities Division, DLA Aviation.
      - Thomas Daley, former deputy director of subsistence, DLA Troop Support.
      - David Falvey, former executive director/program executive officer, DLA Information Operations.
      - Retired Air Force Maj. General Mark Johnson, former director, DLA Logistics Operations.
      - John Kurtz, former director, DLA Distribution Finance, DLA Distribution.

The new members will be inducted at 1 p.m. May 18 in the McNamara Headquarters Complex auditorium at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Information on previous inductees is available at the DLA Hall of Fame webpage.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2466 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2466

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic 
      Petroleum Reserve more effectively, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2466

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic 
      Petroleum Reserve more effectively, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be 
cited as the ``Energy Policy and Conservation Act Amendments Act of 
1994''.

                TITLE I--ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION

SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE.

    This title may be cited as the ``Energy Policy and Conservation Act 
Amendments of 1994''.

SEC. 102. TITLE I AMENDMENTS.

    Part D of title I of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act is 
amended in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251), by striking ``September 30, 
1994'' each time it appears and inserting ``June 30, 1996''.

SEC. 103. TITLE II AMENDMENTS.

    Part D of title II of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act is 
amended in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285), by striking ``September 30, 
1994'' each time it appears and inserting ``June 30, 1996''.

            Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day, September 
      12), 1994.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 26, 2014

d1125

Order 

Clerk

November 26, 2014

149479

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149479

COA: 318303

Calhoun CC: 2011-003642-FC

LEO DUWAYNE ACKLEY, a/k/a LEO

DUANE ACKLEY, JR., and LEO

DUWAYNE ACKLEY II,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order 

addressing whether the defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel based on 

trial counsel’s failure to adequately investigate the possibility of obtaining expert 

testimony in support of the defense. The parties should not submit mere restatements of 

their application papers.