alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMERIGROUP Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), Jeffrey L. McWaters, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge, and E. Paul Dunn, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Jeffrey L. McWatersJeffrey L. McWatersChairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 6, 2005 /s/ E. Paul Dunn, Jr.E. Paul Dunn, Jr.Executive Vice President, Chief
  Financial Officer and TreasurerDate: May 6, 2005 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Com. v. Real 24

05/10/2016

28 EAL (2016)

24

. Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 499
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

BINSWANGER OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

INC.,

Petitioner

v.

TSG REAL ESTATE LLC,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 146 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

BINSWANGER OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

INC.,

Petitioner

v.

TSG REAL ESTATE, LLC,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 147 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
No. 10-6079.

#### Susan Stowell, Petitioner v. Toll Brothers, Inc.

562 U.S. 1008, 131 S. Ct. 514,

178 L. Ed. 2d 380,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8505,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
S91A1408.

#### BERESH v. MESSMORE.

(411 SE2d 493)

Clarke, Chief Justice.

In 1988, Jasper Messmore filed a complaint for divorce against Janet Beresh, alleging the existence of a common-law marriage. Beresh filed an answer but did not appear at the hearing on the divorce. The trial court granted a final decree of divorce in 1988. In October 1990, Beresh retained counsel who filed a motion to set aside the judgment. Notice of the hearing on the motion was published, listing Beresh as pro se. Neither Beresh nor her counsel appeared at the hearing on the motion. The motion to set aside was denied. On the day after the hearing Beresh’s attorney filed a motion to reschedule the hearing, pointing out that the notice did not list counsel’s name. Counsel stated that the hearing date did not come to his attention until after the date had passed. The trial court denied the request to reschedule the hearing. Beresh appeals.

Under the rule of *Brown v. C & S Nat. Bank,*245 Ga. 515 (265 SE2d 791) (1980), notice of a hearing that does not contain the counsel’s name is defective. A judgment or order based on a trial or hearing entered against a party without notice to that party is subject to a motion to set aside. Id.

Messmore argues that Beresh failed to comply with Superior Court Rule 4.6 by notifying the calendar clerk of the change in representation. He argues that Beresh is not entitled to complain of defects in the notice that she or her counsel caused. A similar argument was made in *Brown,*supra at 516, n. 1. In that case, the party initially appeared pro se, but was later represented by an attorney who filed signed pleadings. We held that the attorney was entitled to notice of the trial. Id. Similarly, here, although Beresh appeared pro se in the initial divorce in 1988, she hired an attorney to represent her in the motion to set aside. This attorney filed a signed pleading, which constitutes an entry of appearance under Superior Court Rule 4.2. Be*813cause this attorney was Beresh’s first representative, the entry of appearance was sufficient under Superior Court Rule 4.2. No notice of change of representation was required under Superior Court Rule 4.6.

Decided January 9, 1992.

*Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Elizabeth V. Tanis, Laura M. Shamp,*for appellant.

*Clifford H. Hardwick,*for appellee.

In sum, we conclude that Beresh is entitled to a hearing on her motion to set aside the judgment of divorce. We do not reach any issue relating to the merits of the motion to set aside. Nevertheless, we vacate the judgment below to allow the trial court to consider all of the issues at the hearing on the motion.

*Judgment vacated and remanded.*

*Weltner, P. J., Bell, Hunt, Benham and Fletcher, JJ., concur.*
No. 10-5957.

#### Antonio C. Carter, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 969, 131 S. Ct. 476,

178 L. Ed. 2d 302,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7937.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 23 So. 3d 1238.
# C_2013359EN.01001401.xml

| 7.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/14

---

Order of the General Court of 15 October 2013 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-149/13) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Point from which time starts to run - Publication in the Official Journal - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 359/26

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented: initially by S. Centeno Huerta, and subsequently by J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, abogados del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, J. Baquero Cruz and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Notice of Open Competition No EPSO/AST/126/12, to constitute a reserve list of assistants (AST 3), ‘Research’ sector, in the fields of ‘Biology, Life and Health Sciences’, ‘Chemistry’, ‘Physics and Materials Science’, ‘Nuclear Research’, ‘Civil and Mechanical Engineering’ and ‘Electrical Engineering and Electronics’ (OJ 2012, C 394 A, p.11)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Kingdom of Spain is ordered to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 132 (Friday, July 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 39831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16961]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Sixth Meeting: Special Committee 231 (SC 231)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Sixth Meeting Notice of Special Committee 231.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
sixth meeting of the Special Committee 231.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 22nd-September 24th from 9:00 
a.m.-5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th 
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, Tel: (202) 330-0663.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or 
Sophie Bousquet, Program Director, RTCA, Inc., sbousquet@rtca.org, 
(202) 330-0663.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Special Committee 231. The agenda 
will include the following:

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

1. Welcome/Introduction
2. Administrative Remarks
3. Agenda Review
4. Summary of Working Group activities
5. Other Business
6. Date and Place of Next Meeting

Wednesday, September 23, 2015

1. Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

Thursday, September 24, 2015

1. Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 7, 2015.
Latasha Robinson,
Management & Program Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and 
Administration, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-16961 Filed 7-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
# C_2014024EN.01000601.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 7 November 2013 — Annegret Weitkämper-Krug v NRW Bank, an institution governed by public-law

(Case C-571/13)

2014/C 24/10

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Annegret Weitkämper-Krug

Applicant:

Defendant: NRW Bank, an institution governed by public-law

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

| 1. | Is Article 27(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (1) of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) to be interpreted as meaning that the court other than the court first seised, which has exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to Article 22 of Regulation 44/2001, must nevertheless stay its proceedings until such time as the jurisdiction of the court first seised, which does not have exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to Article 22 of Regulation No 44/2001, is definitively established? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 27(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (1) of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) to be interpreted as meaning that the court other than the court first seised, which has exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to Article 22 of Regulation 44/2001, must nevertheless stay its proceedings until such time as the jurisdiction of the court first seised, which does not have exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to Article 22 of Regulation No 44/2001, is definitively established?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).

1

---
DLA Disposition Services helps Texas FD upgrade fleet via used equipment transfer
 By Jeff Landenberger
  Texas’ Minerva Volunteer Fire Department recently increased its fleet capacity by adding an excess military truck received through the Defense Department’s Firefighter Property Program. At the federal level, the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services collects the still-usable military equipment and partners with the U.S. Forest Service to ensure items finds their way to firefighters that can put it to use, often in rural environments. Fire Chief Ernie Glenn of the Minerva Volunteer Fire Department in Texas stands next to the truck his department received through the Defense Department’s Firefighter Property Program. The program puts excess military equipment from DLA Disposition Services into the hands of firefighters where it can be put to use.




Fire Chief Ernie Glenn of the Minerva Volunteer Fire Department in Texas stands next to a former military truck. The truck has been converted into a fire truck and painted red.
        Minerva truck
            Fire Chief Ernie Glenn of the Minerva Volunteer Fire Department in Texas stands next to the truck his department received through the Defense Department’s Firefighter Property Program. The program puts excess military equipment from DLA Disposition Services into the hands of firefighters where it can be put to use.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Minerva Volunteer Fire Department
                    
                    VIRIN: 220128-O-AA987-007 “This new addition will increase our wildland firefighting power and our ability for high water rescues,” said Minerva VFD Fire Chief Ernie Glenn. One of the stipulations for receiving a former military vehicle that that they be painted a nonmilitary color. “Our department members spent a lot of hours painting the truck and making it service ready,” said Glenn. The truck will carry a cache of wildland firefighting equipment and water rescue devices. “This military truck gives the Minerva VFD firefighters a versatile apparatus to help respond to the wide range of emergencies in the area,” said Texas A&M Forest Service Regional Fire Coordinator Matthew Schlaefer. “It will help increase their capacity to save life and property.” Minerva Volunteer Fire Department has been operating since 1974 and its leadership expressed appreciation for the opportunity to add new firefighting capabilities via DLA. “The cost of the truck conversion was met through donations from our community, Chad Harris, Drake McLean, County Judge Steve Young, and Milam County,” said Glenn. “We greatly appreciate all of the support and for Texas A&M Forest Service having the grant programs available to volunteer fire departments.” The DOD FPP was launched in Texas in 2005 to help increase the capacity of the state’s volunteer fire departments.
No. 10-5014.

#### Jason Claycomb, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 899, 131 S. Ct. 228,

178 L. Ed. 2d 151,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6392.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 832.
#### In the Matter of Sciame Construction LLC, Appellant, v Re: Source New Jersey, Inc., Respondent.

[67 NYS3d 462]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered June 16, 2017, which denied petitioner’s petition to permanently stay arbitration, and dismissed this CPLR article 75 proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The typewritten terms of the parties’ subcontract unambiguously and affirmatively establish an express agreement to arbitrate all disputes *(Matter of Waldron [Goddess],*61 NY2d 181, 183-184 [1984]). To the extent any printed riders or exhibits were incorporated into the subcontract by reference, the subcontract’s typewritten portions regarding binding dispute resolution “represent an express manifestation of the parties’ actual intentions and take precedence over any inconsistent provisions in the printed form[s]” *(Matter of Cale Dev. Co. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd.,*94 AD2d 229, 234 [1st Dept 1983], *affd*61 NY2d 976 [1984]). Contrary to petitioner’s argument, an inconsistency provision in one of the purported exhibits is, by its plain terms, inapplicable to the parties’ subcontract; to construe it otherwise would impermissibly rewrite the provision under the guise of contract construction *(Macy’s Inc. v Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.,*127 AD3d 48, 54 [1st Dept 2015]).

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.R, Gische, Tom, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 50 (Thursday, March 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 16356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05819]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8227]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Somalia

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act with respect to Somalia, and I hereby 
waive this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 29, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.
    This document was received by the Office of the Federal Register on 
March 8, 2013.

[FR Doc. 2013-05819 Filed 3-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
```
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Bioenvision, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David P. Luci,
Director of Finance and General Counsel of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                    /s/ David P. Luci
                    ---------------------------------------
                    David P. Luci
                    Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel
                    October 13, 2005
# Distribution commander guides local high school students in future planning

/ Published May 31, 2016
MILLERSVILLE, Pennsylvania, 
DLA Distribution commander Army Brig. Gen. Richard Dix met with approximately 300 Penn Manor High School students, during two assemblies, to discuss their futures on May 20.

Dix discussed using the “Five Year Plan,” a counseling tool used by the Department of the Army, to guide their education and professional development. He was able to explain the plan in a way that allowed the ninth and 10th grade students to map out their next five years culminating at the end of their freshman and sophomore years of college.

Understanding that this generation is extremely visually inclined, Dix explained to the students that when he was coming out of high school computers were not available to the masses. However, he had his five year plan written out on paper. 

Stressing the importance of developing more than one plan in the event something does not work out, Dix used personal experiences to drive the point home to the students. “It is important to include your dream job on the chart, as it gives you something to work toward. But have other goals, in the event of setbacks.”

Additionally, Dix advised the students to take both the SAT and ACT to provide for more options as they look to their future goals.

“Your future is not about anyone else,” explained Dix. “I only ask that you to grow up to be everything you want to be.”
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT OF  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), the
undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation.

Date: November 5, 2010/s/ GILBERT M. CASSAGNE Gilbert M. Cassagne, Chief Executive Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not
a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation and will be retained by
Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-5397.

#### Billy Wayne Williams, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 919, 131 S. Ct. 290,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7387.

178 L. Ed. 2d 190,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-6843.

#### In re Clinton Earl Ross, Jr., Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1001, 131 S. Ct. 551,

178 L. Ed. 2d 409,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8384.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
# C_2013359EN.01001302.xml

| 7.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/13

---

Order of the General Court of 14 October 2013 — Vicente Gandia Pla, SA v OHIM — Tesco Stores (MARQUES DE CHIVÉ)

(Case T-128/13) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Surrender of national trade mark - Action which becomes devoid of purpose in the course of proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 359/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vicente Gandia Pla, SA (Chiva, Spain) (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Tesco Stores Ltd (Cheshunt, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 December 2012 (Case R 854/2012-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Tesco Stores Ltd and Vicente Gandia Pla, SA.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.

1

---
No. 10-6535.

#### In re Jaime A. Davidson, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 959, 131 S. Ct. 496,

178 L. Ed. 2d 316,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7887.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.