alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Distribution Current Operations chief retires after 38 years

/ Published Dec. 31, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
DLA’s chief of current operations retired in December, following a 38-year career with the Federal government in which he began as a warehouse worker.

Pat McCormick on Dec. 18 was honored the DLA Exceptional Civilian Service Award, the Quartermaster Corps Order of Saint Martin, and other accolades.

McCormick’s career encompassed all facets of DLA’s support around the world. His leadership was invaluable to DLA Distribution’s support to Operation United Assistance in 2014, in which his directorate helped set up life-saving Ebola treatment facilities in West Africa. He enabled DLA to move critical supplies to this austere environment and helped deploy 28 DLA Distribution employees to serve there. Within 90 days, the team had set up distribution operations in warehouses in Liberia and Senegal; created an accountable, manual system to receive, store and issue items; and executed over 1,300 truck transportation missions to help build 15 Ebola-treatment units.

Stateside as well, McCormick’s leadership made a difference. In 2012, the president of the United States and the DLA director recognized DLA Distribution for its work providing humanitarian relief to Hurricane Sandy.  Nearly 150,000 blankets, 5,000 cots, 5,200 cases of Meals-Ready-To-Eat, and other items—many of which were for the same or next day—were processed and shipped on time.  

His efforts significantly benefited combat operations as well. The same year DLA assisted with Hurricane Sandy relief, McCormick led DLA Distribution Kandahar to begin receiving, storing and distributing of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles (MRAPs). He also spearheaded the use of Army Serviceable Excess materiel in support of U.S. Forces Afghanistan, in which DLA-owned materiel was replaced with excess equipment the Army owned, already in Afghanistan—a move that saved taxpayers over $180 million and made the Army’s supply support there more reliable.

McCormick’s leadership achieved long-term changes to benefit the warfighter. He was instrumental in ensuring effective stock positioning and improving overseas customer support by establishing new overseas distribution centers in Sigonella, Italy; Guam; and Kuwait; South Korea; Afghanistan; and Bahrain—as well as a distribution capability in Djibouti.  These sites dramatically shortened wait times and reduced transportation costs.
# DLA Aviation employees reach out to community during the holidays

/ Published Dec. 17, 2015

On Dec. 11, DLA Aviation at Warner Robins, Georgia employees demonstrated their generosity in supporting local charities by collecting and delivering toys and clothes to the local Salvation Army.  Thirty children, who had provided their Christmas Wish List to the Salvation Army, became Christmas angels for DLA Aviation employees.
The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of * Nebraska, sitting by designation. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-4092SI

_____________ William R. Howell, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security, * * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: April 13, 1998

Filed: April 22, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and STROM, District Judge. *

_____________ PER CURIAM. Wil liam R. Howell appeals the district court's grant of summary judgmen t affirmingthe Commissioner's decision to deny Howell supplemental security income benefits. After careful review of the parties' briefs and the administrative record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the decision of the Commissioner that Howell is not d isabled for Social Security purposes. We affirm for the reasons stated in th e district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Leadership Spotlight: Tim Dauten
 By Public Affairs
  **Operations Director
Battle Creek, Michigan** **Man in black suit, white shirt and red, white, blue tie  in front of American and DLA flag for official photo
        Tim Dauten
            Tim Dauten is the new Operations Director for DLA Disposition Services.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Jace Armstrong
                    
                    VIRIN: 231022-D-OS362-4000** Operations is the most important Directorate in DLA Disposition Services.  We provide guidance, enforce policy, and provide advice to our field sites and customers on the cradle to grave process for all reverse logistics functions. **How long have you worked for the federal government including military service?**17 years, 14 of which have been with DLA Disposition Services. **What is your favorite thing about your line of work?** The people. **What is the best piece of advice someone has given you**?  Listen with your ears, not your mouth. **Awards/Recognition**: Superior Civilian Service Award (2) **What is one characteristic that you believe every leader should possess?**Never forget where you came from. **What keeps you motivated.**  Knowing our customers rely on us. **What do you see as your biggest challenge right now?**WMS **Why is networking to build professional relationships so important in achieving success?**Successful people surround themselves with other successful people. **What would you have done differently in your career if given the opportunity?**  Complete one assignment in Europe. **Name your favorite/recent book(s) you have read**.  Recent book:  Die with Zero, Getting All You Can From Your Money and Your Life **What was your first job?** Cook at Imo’s Pizza in St. Louis **What is your best memory of working here?** 2013 deployment to Afghanistan **What did you want to be when you grew up?**  Center Fielder for the St. Louis Cardinals **What was your favorite thing about growing up?**  Life seemed easier back then...no cell phones, no social media, etc. **What are your hobbies?**MLB, NFL, NHL, woodworking, travel, hiking
S91A1244.

#### GRAVITT et al. v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS.

(407 SE2d 760)

Decided July 10, 1991.

*Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Emmet J. Bondurant II, P. Richard Game,*for appellants.

*McVay & Stubbs, Robert S. Stubbs III, J. Richard Neville, for*appellee.

Weltner, Justice.

This case is controlled by the holding in *Columbus, Ga. v. Bd. of Water Commrs.,*261 Ga. 219 (403 SE2d 791) (1991).1

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 In that case we cited *Hawkins v. The Intendant of Jonesboro,*63 Ga. 527 (1879), which held:

> [W]hen a statute confers the appointing power, and does not expressly authorize self-appointment, the appointment of some one other than self is always contemplated. The creator is not to be his own creature. ... It cannot be sound that an officer having, or sharing, the power of appointment to another office, can, on general principles, become the incumbent of the latter, either *de jure*or *de facto.*[Id. at 529.]
No. 10-6651.

#### Raul Alvarez Hernandez, Petitioner v. William Duncan, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 1033, 131 S. Ct. 577,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8735.

178 L. Ed. 2d 421,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 395 Fed. Appx. 380.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2529

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act with respect to certain criminal

penalties for acts involving the medicare program or State health care

programs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 6 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act with respect

to certain criminal penalties for acts involving the medicare program or State health care programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR ACTS INVOLVING

4 THE MEDICARE PROGRAM OR STATE HEALTH

5 CARE PROGRAMS.

6 Section 1128B(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42

7 U.S.C. 1320a–7b(b)(3)) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara9 graph (D);
2

•S 2529 IS

1 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub2 paragraph (E) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub4 paragraph:

5 ‘‘(F)(i) any premium payment made to a health

6 insurer or health maintenance organization by a

7 State agency in connection with a demonstration

8 project operated under the State medicaid program

9 pursuant to section 1115 with respect to individuals

10 participating in such project; or

11 ‘‘(ii) any payment made by a health insurer or

12 a health maintenance organization to a sales rep13 resentative or a licensed insurance agent for the

14 purpose of servicing, marketing, or enrolling individ15 uals participating in such demonstration project in a

16 health plan offered by such an insurer or organiza17 tion.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald M. Stevens,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the date of the financial statements contained therein.

/s/ RONALD M. STEVENS
---------------------------------------------------
Ronald M. Stevens
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
May 10, 2005

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Loudeye Corp. and will be retained by Loudeye Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Steven J. Bond, Petitioner, v Village of Potsdam, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 684]

Crew III, J.P.

Proceeding initiated in this Court pursuant to EDPL 207 to review a determination of respondent which found that there was a public benefit to be served by the proposed condemnation of petitioner’s property.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to the EDPL seeking to reject respondent’s determination that acquisition of petitioner’s real property, located in the Village of Potsdam, St. Lawrence County, did not serve a valid public purpose and that the proceeding was not in conformity with the statutory provisions provided therefor *(see*EDPL 207 [C] [3] [4]). Petitioner’s litany of objections to the proceeding leading to respondent’s determination merits little discussion. A review of the record makes plain that the proceeding was constitutional, the proposed acquisition was within respondent’s statutory authority, the determination and findings were made in compliance with the EDPL procedural guidelines and the proposed acquisition clearly served a valid public purpose *(see*EDPL 207; *Matter of Waldo’s, Inc. v Village of Johnson City,*74 NY2d 718, 720 [1989]).

Some discussion is, however, merited regarding petitioner’s contention that respondent’s written offer to purchase petitioner’s property was not in compliance with the terms of EDPL 304. Particularly, petitioner contends and respondent concedes that the offer to purchase did not include notice that petitioner could reject or accept same or that the sum offered could be used as an advance payment pending judicial determination of adequate compensation. We need note only that an offer to purchase is not required until eminent domain proceedings have been initiated subsequent to respondent’s determination and findings that the proposed acquisition served a valid public purpose. Indeed, EDPL article 4 specifically provides that “[t]he condemnor may commence proceedings under this article to acquire the property necessary for the proposed public project up to three years . . . [from] publication of its determination and findings pursuant to section [204]” (EDPL 401 [A] [1]). Accordingly, the provisions of EDPL article 3 are not triggered *1108until the proceedings move into the acquisition of title phase as provided in EDPL article 4. Accordingly, respondent’s determination must be confirmed.

Spain, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ivan Acevedo, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 808]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered September 7, 2000, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor’s comments on summation constituted reversible error is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Brown,*297 AD2d 819 [2002]), and, in any event, is without merit. The prosecutor’s summation did not exceed the bounds of rhetorical comment permitted in closing arguments *(see People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105, 109 [1976]), and was harmless under the circumstances *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]; *People v Buehler,*104 AD2d 1045 [1984]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Smith and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
# C_2014431EN.01002002.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/20

---

Order of the General Court of 7 October 2014 — BT v Commission

(Case T-59/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Non-renewal of the contract - Article 76 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal))

(2014/C 431/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: BT (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: N. Visan and G. Coca, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and A.-C. Simon, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 3 December 2012 in Case F-45/12 BT v Commission, ECR-SC, EU:F:2012:168, seeking to have that order set aside.

BT

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | BT shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the course of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

BT shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the course of the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.

1

---
#### People v Devaney

2d Dept: 146 AD3d 803 (Kings)

denied 3/3/17 (Stein, J.)
#### Jennifer Nolletti, Respondent, v David Nolletti, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 810]

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from (1) an order of protection of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), dated January 6, 2003, which, upon the filing by the plaintiff wife of a family offense petition with the Family Court, and the referral of that petition to the Supreme Court, and after a hearing, inter alia, directed him to vacate the marital residence, and (2) so much of an order of the same court entered February 14, 2003, as denied that branch of his motion which was, in effect, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), or to *422compel the plaintiff wife to provide a more definite statement of her allegations.

Ordered that the order dated January 6, 2003, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered February 14, 2003, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff wife.

Contrary to the husband’s contention, the allegations contained in the complaint were sufficient to state a cause of action for divorce based on cruel and inhuman treatment *(see Wanser v Wanser,*214 AD2d 611, 612 [1995]; *Hirschhorn v Hirschhorn,*194 AD2d 768 [1993]; *Horvath v Horvath,*177 AD2d 617, 618 [1991]). Furthermore, the allegations sufficiently apprised the husband of the accusations against him so as to enable him to prepare a defense *(see Pfeil v Pfeil,*100 AD2d 725 [1984]; *Kapchan v Kapchan,*104 AD2d 358, 359 [1984]; *McKilligan v McKilligan,*156 AD2d 904, 907 [1989]).

Moreover, under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court properly issued an order of protection *(see*Family Ct Act § 812 [1]; *Matter of Amy Cohen L. v Howard N.L.,*222 AD2d 677 [1995]).

The husband’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J.P., McGinity, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD 08-98-028]


Drawbridge Operating Regulation; Lafourche Bayou, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District has issued a 
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the 
SR 1 vertical lift bridge across Lafourche Bayou, mile 13.3, in 
Leeville, Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. This deviation allows the 
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development to close the 
bridge to navigation continuously from 7 a.m. on Tuesday through 7 p.m. 
on Thursday each week from July 7, 1998 through July 30, 1998. This 
temporary deviation is issued to allow for the replacement of all four 
sets of lift cables for the vertical lift span.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 7 a.m. on July 7, 1998 until 7 
p.m. on July 9, 1998; from 7 a.m. on July 14, 1998 until 7 p.m. on July 
16, 1998; from 7 a.m. on July 21, 1998 until 7 p.m on July 23, 1998; 
and from 7 a.m. on July 28, 1998 until 7 p.m. on July 30, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Phil Johnson or Mr. David Frank, 
Bridge Administration Branch, Commander (ob), Eighth Coast Guard 
District, 501 Magazine Street, New Orleans, Louisiana, 70130-3396, 
telephone number 504-589-2965.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SR 1 vertical lift span bridge across 
Lafourche Bayou at Leeville, Lafourche Parish, Louisiana has a vertical 
clearance of 40 feet above mean high water in the closed-to-navigation 
position. Mean high water elevation is 3 feet above Mean Sea Level 
(MSL). Navigation on the waterway consists primarily of fishing 
vessels, some tugs with tows and occasional recreational craft. 
Presently, the draw opens on signal for the passage of vessels.
    The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development 
requested a temporary deviation from the normal operation of the bridge 
in order to do maintenance work on the bridge. The work consists of 
replacing all four sets of lift cables of the vertical lift span. The 
cables are worn, have begun to fray, and are in need of immediate 
replacement. This work is essential for the continued safe operation of 
the vertical lift span.
    The District Commander has, therefore, issued a deviation from the 
regulations in 33 CFR 117.5 authorizing the SR 1 vertical lift span 
bridge across Lafourche Bayou, Louisiana to remain in the closed-to-
navigation position continuously from 7 a.m. on Tuesday through 7 p.m. 
on Thursday each week from July 7, 1998 through July 30, 1998.

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
A.L. Gerfin, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, 8th Coast Guard Dist.
[FR Doc. 98-16372 Filed 6-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
# C_2014202EN.01002201.xml

| 30.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 May 2014 — De Luca v Commission

(Case T-200/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Appointment - Classification in grade - Appointment to a post in a higher function group following an open competition - Dismissal of the appeal at first instance after it was referred back by the General Court - Entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Transitional provisions - Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations))

2014/C 202/27

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Patrizia De Luca (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, then S. Orlandi)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, Agent); and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2013 in Case F-20/06 RENV De Luca v Commission, not yet published, requesting that that judgment be set aside.

De Luca

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Ms Patrizia De Luca and the European Commission to each bear their own costs in the two proceedings before the General Court and in the two proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Patrizia De Luca and the European Commission to each bear their own costs in the two proceedings before the General Court and in the two proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs in the two proceedings before the General Court and in the two proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs in the two proceedings before the General Court and in the two proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---