alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Tobyhanna distribution center welcomes new commander

/ Published Sept. 9, 2016
TOBYHANNA, Pennsylvania, 
Army Lt. Col. Jerome (Jay) Barnard assumed command of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Tobyhanna, Pa., in a ceremony on September 9.  The ceremony was officiated by DLA Distribution commander Army Brig. Gen. John Laskodi.

Barnard graduated from Longwood University in 1998 and was commissioned as an ordnance officer.  Following graduation, he attended the Ordnance Officer Basic Course.

From 1999 to 2001, he served as the shop officer and brigade maintenance manager in support of 3rd Brigade, 101st Airborne Division (AASLT).  

Assigned to the 832nd Ordnance Battalion at Redstone Arsenal in 2001, Barnard served as an advanced individual training executive officer and battalion S-1.  In 2003, Barnard graduated from the Combined Logistics Captains Career Course and the Combined Arms and Services Staff School (CAS3).  Upon completing CAS3, he was assigned to 7th Army Training Command, USAREUR and served as the USAREUR training ammunition management officer.  

Barnard was assigned to the 18th Combat Sustainment Support Battalion (CSSB), 16th Sustainment Brigade in Grafenwoehr, Germany, from January 2005 to June 2011 and served in multiple leadership positions.  In the 18th CSSB, his positions included battalion S-4 officer in charge (OIF IV), commander of the 23rd Ordnance Company, battalion executive officer, rear detachment battalion commander, and the support operations officer.  

Barnard graduated from the Command and General Staff College (CGSC) in 2012.  After graduation from CGSC, he became the brigade S-4 of the 4th Combat Aviation Brigade, 4ID.  He deployed to Afghanistan in 2013 and served as the deputy commander of Regional Support Command – North and mayor of Camp Mike Spann.  In 2014, he became the brigade executive officer of the 43d Sustainment Brigade, 4ID.  

His last assignment was at the National Training Center as the senior observer, coach, and trainer for Brigade Support Battalion Support operations officers.   

Barnard’s awards and decorations include: the Bronze Star Medal, the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, the Meritorious Service Medal (with two Oak Leaf Clusters), the Army Commendation Medal (with one Oak Leaf Cluster), the Army Achievement Medal (with one Oak Leaf Cluster), the National Defense Service Medal, the Afghanistan Campaign Ribbon, the Iraq Campaign Medal, the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Army Service Ribbon, the Army Overseas Service Ribbon (Numeral 4), and the NATO ISAF Medal.  He also earned the Air Assault and Parachutist Badges.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1538]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of February 
1998.
    Name: National Advisory Council on the National Health Service 
Corps.
    Date and Time: February 5-8, 1998.
    Place: Arkansas Excelsior Hotel, 3 State House Plaza, Little Rock, 
Arkansas 72201, Telephone: (501) 375-5000.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    Agenda: Agenda items include updates on the NHSC program; reports 
from the State Primary Care Organization, State Primary Care 
Association, and the Area Health Education Center programs and meetings 
of NHSC workgroups on scholarship taxation issues pertaining to the 
NHSC of the 21st century.
    The opening meeting will be held on Thursday, February 5 from 6:00 
p.m. to 9:00 p.m. On Friday and Saturday, meetings will begin at 8:00 
a.m. and conclude around 5:30 p.m. Site visits will be made on Friday.
    Anyone requiring information regarding the subject Council should 
contact Ms. Eve Morrow, National Advisory Council on the National 
Health Service Corps, Health Resources and Services Administration, 8th 
floor, 4350 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, Telephone 
(301) 594-4144.
    Agenda Items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

    Dated: January 16, 1998.
Jane M. Harrison,
Acting Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 98-1538 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
Exhibit 10-7.2



DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION

EXECUTIVE CASH BALANCE
PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1999)



AMENDMENT 2



Pursuant to Section 8 of the Duke Energy Corporation Executive Cash Balance Plan, as amended (Plan), Duke Energy Corporation
(Corporation) hereby amends Section 2.5 of the Plan, effective January 1, 1999, by adding a sentence to the end thereof that reads as follows:



Prior to January 1, 2001, Compensation, as applied to an Employee while both employed by Crescent Resources, Inc. and eligible to participate in the Plan,
shall also include any deferrals by the Employee under the Crescent Resources Incentive Deferral Plan of amounts that could have been deferred as Incentive Plan Deferrals under Section 4.2 under the Duke Energy Corporation Executive Savings Plan.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment to the Plan is executed on
behalf of the Corporation this 6 day of March, 2000.



DUKE ENERGY CORPORATIONBy:

/s/    CHRISTOPHER C.
ROLFEIts:

Vice PresidentCorporate Human Resources
No. 10-5643.

#### Maria Calderon, Petitioner v. Evergreen Owners, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 933, 131 S. Ct. 331,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7263,

178 L. Ed. 2d 215,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 70 App. Div. 3d 742, 895 N.Y.S.2d 154.
#### Warnell Carroll, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

[64 NYS3d 546]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered on or about April 11, 2017, which denied defendants’ motion to vacate and/or modify a prior compliance-conference order directing defendants to produce unredacted copies of documents contained in the Bronx County District Attorney’s files, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the compliance-conference order vacated.

The compliance-conference order should be vacated in this action alleging, inter alia, false arrest and malicious prosecution. “[S]ince the Bronx District Attorney, who is not a party to this action, is not under the control of the City of New York, defendants cannot be expected to produce documents prepared or maintained by any prosecutors” *(Espady v City of New York,*40 AD3d 475, 476 [1st Dept 2007]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
No. 10-5637.

#### Anna M. Buenrostro, Petitioner v. Department of Justice.

562 U.S. 932, 131 S. Ct. 330,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7429,

178 L. Ed. 2d 215,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 115.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2261 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2261

To amend section 922 of title 18, United States Code, to make unlawful 
 a person's failure to comply with firearm purchase requirements after 
                  moving to a new State of residence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 July 1 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 922 of title 18, United States Code, to make unlawful 
 a person's failure to comply with firearm purchase requirements after 
                  moving to a new State of residence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interstate Gun Control Enforcement 
Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH FIREARM PURCHASE REQUIREMENTS IN NEW 
              STATE OF RESIDENCE.

    Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(v)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to transport or cause 
to be transported into a State and thereafter to possess in the State a 
firearm any part or component of which has been transported in or has 
been the object of a transaction affecting interstate commerce if--
            ``(A) the law of the State into which the firearm is 
        transported requires a person to obtain a permit to purchase a 
        firearm; and
            ``(B)(i) within 10 business days after entering the State 
        with intent to reside in the State for a period of more than 30 
        days, the person does not submit an application for such a 
        permit, or another permit for which the standards and 
        procedures for approval are equivalent to a permit to purchase; 
        or
            ``(ii) such an application has been denied, and a period of 
        more than 5 business days has elapsed since the person received 
        notice of the denial.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2013298EN.01000603.xml

| 12.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/6

---

Order of the General Court of 8 July 2013 — ClientEarth and Stichting BirdLife Europe v European Commission

(Case T-56/13) (1)

1

(Access to documents of the institutions - Document held by the Commission concerning European Union energy policy - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 298/10

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom); and Stichting BirdLife Europe (Zeist, Netherlands) (represented by: O. Brouwer, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of the Commission’s implied decision to refuse the applicants access to a document concerning European Union energy policy.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by ClientEarth and Stitching BirdLife Europe. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by ClientEarth and Stitching BirdLife Europe.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.

1

---
# Agency’s fiscal 2021 history, McNamara memoir now available 

/ Published May 23, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
New resources chronicling the Defense Logistics Agency’s recent efforts and the life of its first director are available on the growing history page at DLA’s website. 

The products include DLA’s fiscal 2021 historical report and the World War II memoir of Army Lt. Gen. Andrew McNamara. The annual history captures in one place stories and data on DLA’s worldwide operations, said DLA Historian Colin Williams, who compiled the document with help from agency-wide contributors.

“Our annual histories are meant to be the go-to source for answers to questions about the agency’s past,” he said. “Do you want to know when the Joint Contingency Acquisition Support Office disestablished? Look in the 2021 annual historical report. Do you need to know what hurricanes and other weather events the agency responded to in fiscal 2020? Look in that year’s historical report.” 

The latest report details everything from COVID-19 support to DLA’s designation as the Defense Department’s primary provider of printing services, office print devices and electronic conversation. It’s organized by major subordinate command and directorates, so readers can refer to the table of contents to pinpoint which part of the 256-page document contains information they’re interested in. The report is also cleared by DLA Intelligence and other offices to protect sensitive or classified information. 

Williams said receiving permission from the U.S. Quartermaster Museum to also include McNamara’s World War II memoir on DLA’s history page gives employees and the public access to what he considers amazing stories. 

“They are too good to be kept secret,” he said, adding that McNamara’s reputation was built on his service as quartermaster general for II Corps in North Africa and First Army in Europe. 

Providing useful information is Williams’ goal whether that be through written annual histories, access to DLA charters and strategic plans, or news and feature stories that highlight significant topics. 

“To me, that means including historically significant documents as well as sketches of agency and major subordinate command history,” he said. “By looking at the site now, you can see it’s developing into a document repository with old agency charters and strategic plans among other records.”
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T OCTOB ER 27, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 9

- 1 1 2 7 3 N o n
- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 8

- 0 0 1 7 6

- C R

- W S

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

J A M E S H A R O L D B U R K E , J R

. , a

. k

. a

. S h o r t M a n ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f A l a b a m a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( O c t o b e r 2 7 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e B L A C K , M A R C U S a n d A N D E R S O N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

K r i s t e n G a r t m a n R o g e r s , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r J a m e s H a r o l d B u r k e , J r

. , h a sf

i l e d a m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w o n a p p e a l , s u p p o r t e d b y a b r i e f p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o

A n d e r s v
. C a l i f

o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r
i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e

r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e

e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o i s s u e s o f a r g u a b l e m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s
G R A N T E D , a n d B u r k e ’ s c o n v i c t i o n a n d s e n t e n c e a r e A F F I R M E D
.

2
No. 10-6012.

#### Tanger Anita Harris, Petitioner v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company, et al.

562 U.S. 1007, 131 S. Ct. 509,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8469,

178 L. Ed. 2d 377,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 804.
No. 10-6522.

#### Rodney L. Fuller, Petitioner v. Loretta Kelly, Warden.

562 U.S. 1067, 131 S. Ct. 649,

178 L. Ed. 2d 488,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9394.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 438.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15169]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3078]


State of Tennessee; (Amendment #3)

    In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency dated May 18, 1998, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
on April 16, 1998 and continuing through May 18, 1998.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is June 19, 1998 and for 
economic injury the termination date is January 20, 1999.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: May 21, 1998.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-15169 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
#### People v Sanchez

App Term, 1st Dept: 54 Misc 3d 133(A) (NY)

denied 3/22/17 (Stein, J.)
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Companys chief executive officer certifies as follows:



(a) This Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



(b) The information contained in this Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/Lawrence N. Smith   
|-----------------------
|Lawrence N. Smith      
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: August 11, 2003  



31
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul M. Anderson, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    PAUL M. ANDERSON                                                          
|Paul M. Anderson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer March 31,
2006
*July 12, 2017*

2017-Ohio-5793.]

*14702017-0803.

#### Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. DiMartino.

On certification of default. Dennis Armand DiMartino, Attorney Registration No. 0039270, suspended from the practice of law for an interim period.
#### People v Ramsundar (Gomatee)

2d Dept: 138 AD3d 890 (Queens)

denied 8/26/16 (DiFiore, Ch. J.)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16032]



[[Page 33122]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2838]


Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice; Closed 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State 
Department--Overseas Security Advisory Council on July 15 and 16, at 
the New York Palace Hotel in New York, New York. Pursuant to Section 
10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (1) 
and (4), it has been determined the meeting will be closed to the 
public. Matters relative to classified national security information as 
well as privileged commercial information will be discussed. The agenda 
calls for the discussion of classified and corporate proprietary/
security information as well as private sector physical and procedural 
security policies and protective programs at sensitive U.S. Government 
and private sector locations overseas.
    For more information contact Nick Proctor, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, Department of State, Washington, D.C. 20522-1003, 
phone: 202-663-0869.

    Dated: June 3, 1998.
Peter E. Bergin,
Director of the Diplomatic Security Service.
[FR Doc. 98-16032 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-M
#### Arnulfo Ahumada, Appellant, v Arthur Drogan, as Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Elaine Drogan, Deceased, Respondent.

[55 NYS3d 655]—

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered November 16, 2015, granting defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the jury verdict awarding plaintiff $500,000 for past pain and suffering and $250,000 for future pain and suffering over 10 years as against the weight of the evidence and excessive and remanding for a new trial on damages, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to so remand unless plaintiff stipulates, within 20 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, to reduce the jury award for past pain and suffering to $300,000, and future pain and suffering to $150,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court properly directed a verdict in plaintiff’s favor that he had suffered a fractured fibula, constituting a serious injury *(see*Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Defendant offered no evidence to dispute plaintiff’s medical expert that plaintiff sustained such an injury, as shown on imaging tests, which defendant’s expert testified he could not dispute. Also, Supreme *440Court did not err in allowing plaintiff’s radiologist to testify regarding the MRI films he had interpreted that were not entered into evidence *(Schozer v William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.,*84 NY2d 639, 643-644 [1994]), especially where they had been subpoenaed and where defendant’s expert had reviewed them but defendant chose not to call him to testify.

However, unlike the trial court which opined that the verdict should be at maximum $250,000, we find the verdict excessive only to the extent indicated *(see Gaston v City of New York,*59 AD3d 281 [1st Dept 2009]; *Smith v Vohrer,*62 AD3d 528 [1st Dept 2009]; *Lopez v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc.,*40 AD3d 221 [1st Dept 2007]; *Uriondo v Timberline Camplands, Inc.,*19 AD3d 282 [1st Dept 2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 704 [2006]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Web-ber, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
No. 10-5856.

#### Patricia Buchanan, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 968, 131 S. Ct. 472,

178 L. Ed. 2d 300,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7972.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 395 Ill. App. 3d 1113, 369 Ill. Dec. 491, 986 N.E.2d 804.