alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-11166.

#### Jerome Scott and Charles Lawrence, Petitioners v. United States.

562 U.S. 1061, 131 S. Ct. 636,

178 L. Ed. 2d 477,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9170.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 365 Fed. Appx. 702.
No. 10-6748.

#### Roberto Aponte, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1071, 131 S. Ct. 662,

178 L. Ed. 2d 495,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9048.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2014093EN.01002301.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2014 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — Semtee (CALDEA)

(Case T-26/13) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark CALDEA - Earlier international word mark BALEA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2014/C 93/39

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: O. Bludovsky, B. Beinert and A. Bender, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Semtee (Escaldes Engordany, Andorra)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2012 (Case R 2432/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG and Semtee.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.

1

---
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

July 10, 2012 Session

KIMBERLIE EDMONSON v. JEREMY JAMES McCOSH ET AL.

Appeal from the Chancery Court for McMinn County

No. 23964 Jerri S. Bryant, Chancellor

No. E2010-01588-COA-R3-CV-FILED-SEPTEMBER 6, 2012

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., Judge, concurring in result.

I concur completely in the result reached by the majority. I write separately to express

my disagreement with the following dicta in the majority opinion:

While the wording of [Tennessee Supreme Court] Rule 13

[§1(d)(2)(B)] indicates that Grandmother may have had a

statutory right to an attorney during the termination proceeding,

. . .

(Emphasis in original.)

As relevant to the facts of this case, Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 13 §1(d)(2)(B)

provides as follows:

In the following proceedings, . . . the court . . . shall advise any

party without counsel of the right to be represented throughout

the case by counsel and that counsel will be appointed if the

party is indigent and, . . . requests appointment of counsel. . . .

(B) Cases under Titles 36 and 37 of the Tennessee Code

Annotated involving allegations against parentsthat could result

in finding a child dependent or neglected or in terminating

parental rights;

In my opinion, this provision does not apply to Kimberlie Edmonson because she is not a

“party” to the termination case and is not a “parent[]” of the child at issue in Father and
Stepmother’s petition to terminate Mother’s parental rights. Accordingly, I would hold that

Ms. Edmonson was not entitled to the appointment of counsel in the termination action of

which she was not a party; and that, based upon well-established precedent cited in the

majority opinion, she has no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in the

custody case of which she is a party.

_______________________________

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE

-2-
No. 10-7038.

#### Dewey B. Powell, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1052, 131 S. Ct. 619,

178 L. Ed. 2d 449,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8978.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# Pearl Harbor’s Inventory Support Team named Team of the Quarter

/ Published Aug. 24, 2015
PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii, 
DLA Distribution Pearl Harbor’s Inventory Support Team has been named Team of the Quarter for the third quarter of fiscal year 2015.

The team, comprised of members Robert Kirts, Sandra Nakamura, Susan Dela Pina, Matthew Hoapili, Grosvenor Catbagan, Ikaika Anderson, and Army Tech. Sgt. Suzette Green, displayed their determination, perseverance, drive and absolute “can do” attitude through notable accomplishments.  

According to Kirts, the team’s supervisor, the group embodied the “team” concept in executing inventory functions for more than 240,000 locations covering over 80,500 line items, including retail and wholesale materiel.  

Despite three newly hired employees, the team completed 68 percent of the wholesale annual location survey within two months, achieveing a 99.9 percent accuracy rate.  In total, the team conducted over 1,400 floor-to-book counts, increasing inventory accuracy across 35,000 line items.  Eradicating potential discrepancies across wholesale and retail stocks, the team boasted a 0.22 percent denial rate, almost 50 percent below the 0.4 standard.  

Finally, the Inventory Support Team revitalized the retail inventory program.  Conducting two direct material inventories and performing over 2,000 inventory counts, the team achieved a 99.7 and 99.4 percent accuracy, respectively.
# C&T employee receives local Federal Executive Board leadership award

/ Published May 16, 2024
PHILADELPHIA, 
An inventory management specialist in the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support’s Clothing and Textiles supply chain, received the Leadership Category award from the Federal Executive Board on May 14 at DLA Troop Support Headquarters in Philadelphia.

Ligia Perkins was honored for being an outstanding team lead and for her success of supporting several DLA Troop Support high visibility initiatives.

While the official FEB Excellence in Government Awards was held earlier this month, FEB Eastern Region Director Steve Millen made a special visit to DLA Troop Support to present Perkins with her trophy.

“The leadership category in excellence in government is a pivotal category for celebrating federal employees,” Millen said. "It is my pleasure to take the time out of my day to come here and present this award to Ligia.”

Perkins works on the C&T Organizational Clothing and Individual Equipment Planning Division team and was nominated for the award by her supervisor Jorge Valentin Torres, who says Perkins is so deserving of this recognition.

“I believe that every hard-working employee who makes a difference in any agency should be honored for their dedication and commitment to the nation,” Torres said. “Ligia is one of those employees who truly made a difference to the Clothing and Textiles Planning Division.”

Perkins said her dedication to the warfighter stems from her own deployment in the Army.

“My favorite thing is the feeling of paying it forward to the warfighter,” she said. “Planning and fulfilling their needs is like a small token of appreciation for what they do. I served seven years of active duty in the Army. I’ve been in their shoes, so I know what is like to be on the receiving end. It’s really an honor to be a part of this great team.”

Each year during Public Service Recognition Week, FEBs nationwide recognize high-performing federal employees in their local communities and highlight innovative efforts that advance their respective agency’s missions. 

Perkins is not the only award winner from DLA Troop Support.

Out of 15 Philadelphia Federal Agencies and 75 nominations submitted, DLA Troop Support won three gold medals and one bronze medals in the 11 award categories.

Additional DLA Troop Support 2024 FEB Excellence in Government Awardees include:

**Outstanding Achievement** - Supervisor/Manager – Thomas Strain (C&E) – Gold medal

**Collaboration Champions** – Flu Team (Medical) – Gold medal

**Leadership Award** – Ligia Perkins (C&T) – Gold medal

**EEO Special Emphasis Committee Team**—Adele Mayo EEO Diversity Leadership Award –– Bronze medal
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**          We have issued our reports dated September 12, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedule in the Annual Report of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of saidreports in the Registration Statements of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8(File No. 33-19288, effective December 23, 1987; File No. 33-26065, effective February 18, 1988;File No. 33-32984, effective January 12, 1990; File No. 33-38914, effective February 8, 1991; FileNo. 33-38914, effective September 26, 1994; File No. 333-18515, effective December 20, 1996 andFile No. 333-128312, effective September 14, 2005) and Forms S-3 (File No. 333-60987, effectiveAugust 21, 1998, File No. 333-32144, effective March 10, 2000, File No. 333-58506, effective April23, 2001, File No. 333-65580, effective August 3, 2001 and File No. 333-73796, effective November20, 2001).
#### People v Gee

App Div, 4th Dept, 6/6/16 (Monroe)

dismissed 8/10/16 (DiFiore, Ch. J.)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF GREATE BAY CASINO CORPORATION

                                                                        State
    Name                         Address                              Organized

PPI Corporation            Two Galleria Tower                         New Jersey
                           13455 Noel Road, Suite 2200
                           Dallas, Texas 75240

PPI Funding Corp.          Two Galleria Tower                         Delaware
                           13455 Noel Road, Suite 2200
                           Dallas, Texas 75240

PCPI Funding Corp.         Two Galleria Tower                         Delaware
                           13455 Noel Road, Suite 2200
                           Dallas, Texas 75240

Advanced Casino Systems    200 Decadon Drive, Suite 100               Delaware
 Corporation               Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey 08234
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1

<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                98
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      98
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        4,553,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 409,642
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           14
<COMMON>                                              19,552
<OTHER-SE>                                            4,143,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          4,553,598
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      621,410
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    17,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (638,573)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (638,573)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (638,573)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.03)



</TABLE>
No. 09-11343.

#### Ronald F. Martinez, Petitioner v. L. E. Scribner, Warden.

562 U.S. 875, 131 S. Ct. 182,

178 L. Ed. 2d 109,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6451.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
2016-1776.

#### State ex rel. Hogan Lovells US, L.L.P. v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion denied. Alternative writ granted. Briefing schedule set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05.

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Eric Haskell, Chief Financial Officer of SunCom Wireless, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SunCom Wireless, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293] for the registrant and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293]; 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 13, 2007
# C_2016364EN.01004502.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/45

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 August 2016 –Mommer v Commission

(Case F-74/13) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes - Decision recognising years of pensionable service applying the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 364/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Anne Mommer (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. de Abreu Caldas, lawyers, and subsequently by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: C. Ehrbar and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and finally by: G. Gattinara, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights to the European Union pension scheme, which decision applies the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013, p. 33.

---
# C_2015081EN.01001701.xml

| 9.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2015 — Novomatic v OHIM — Simba Toys (AFRICAN SIMBA)

(Case T-172/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark AFRICAN SIMBA - Earlier national figurative mark Simba - Relative ground for refusal - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 081/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novomatic AG (Gumpoldskirchen, Austria) (represented by: W. Mosing, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG (Fürth, Germany) (represented by: O. Ruhl and C. Sachs, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 January 2013 (Case R 157/2012-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Simba Toys GmbH & Co. KG and Novomatic AG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Novomatic AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Novomatic AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Principal Financial OfficerRequired by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)of theExchange Act**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAdvanstar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the threemonths ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W. Montgomery, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge:

 (1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| By:    | /s/ David W. Montgomery |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | David W. Montgomery     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                    |
|   | Date: May 15, 2006 |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ JACK C. BRIDGESJack C. BridgesExecutive Vice-PresidentMarch 30, 2004Date
No. 10-6442.

#### Kevin A. Tolliver, Petitioner v. Michael Sheets, Warden.

562 U.S. 1047, 131 S. Ct. 605,

178 L. Ed. 2d 441,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8817.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 900.
No. 10-5025 (R46-003).

#### Ivan Silva-Arzeta, aka Ivan Selva, aka Tony Arellano Cebrero, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 997, 131 S. Ct. 504,

178 L. Ed. 2d 365,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8660.

November 1, 2010.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 1208.