alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013274EN.01000801.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 3 July 2013 — Ascendi Beiras Litoral e Alta, Auto Estradas das Beiras Litoral e Alta, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-377/13)

2013/C 274/13

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ascendi Beiras Litoral e Alta, Auto Estradas das Beiras Litoral e Alta, S.A.

Applicant:

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Article 4(1)(c) and (2)(a), Article 7(1) and Article 10(a) of Council Directive 69/335/EEC (1) of 17 July 1969 (as amended by Council Directive 85/303 EEC (2) of 10 June 1985) preclude national legislation, such as Decree-Law No 322-8/2001 of 14 December 2001, which subjected to stamp duty any increases in the capital of capital companies through the conversion into capital of the claims of shareholders in respect of ancillary services provided previously to the company, even if those ancillary services had been provided in cash, bearing in mind that, as at 1 July 1984, national legislation subjected those increases in capital, made in that way, to stamp duty at the rate of 2 %, and that, at the same date, it exempted from stamp duty capital increases made in cash?

1

2

---

(1)  Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital

1

OJ, English Special Edition 1969 (II), p. 412.

(2)  Council Directive 85/303/EEC of 10 June 1985 amending Directive 69/335/EEC concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital

2

OJ 1985 L 156, p. 23.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2571 

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, 

join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2019 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. CARTER of 

Texas, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. DAVIDSON of 

Ohio, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. HICE of Georgia, 

Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. 

SCHWEIKERT, Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. ROONEY of Florida, Mr. BABIN, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. LUCAS, 

Mr. BANKS, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. PERRY, Mr. COLE, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. HUDSON, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. MARCHANT, 

Mr. BUCK, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. COLLINS of 

Georgia, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. BUDD, Mr. GRAVES of Georgia, Mr. HILL of Arkansas, Mr. TIMMONS, Ms. CHENEY, Mr. LONG, Mr. 

YOHO, Mr. PALMER, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. RATCLIFFE, 

and Mr. DUNN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to 

refrain from such activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2571 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Right-to3 Work Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELA5 TIONS ACT. 

6 (a) Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

7 U.S.C. 157) is amended by striking ‘‘except to’’ and all 

8 that follows through ‘‘authorized in section 8(a)(3)’’. 

9 (b) Section 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations 

10 Act (29 U.S.C. 158(a)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘: Pro11 vided, That’’ and all that follows through ‘‘retaining mem12 bership’’. 

13 (c) Section 8(b) of the National Labor Relations Act 

14 (29 U.S.C. 158(b)) is amended— 

15 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or to dis16 criminate’’ and all that follows through ‘‘retaining 

17 membership’’; and 

18 (2) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘covered by 

19 an agreement authorized under subsection (a)(3)’’. 

20 (d) Section 8(f) of the National Labor Relations Act 

21 (29 U.S.C. 158(f)) is amended by striking paragraph (2) 

22 and redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs 

23 (2) and (3), respectively. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2571 IH

1 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT. 

2 Section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152) 

3 is amended by striking paragraph Eleventh. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Com. v. Kennedy

08/17/2016

165 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 205
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35244-35245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.

    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

[[Page 35245]]

    Name of Committee: Minority Programs Review Committee, Mbrs 
Subcommittee B, Minority Biomedical Research Support Review 
Subcommittee.
    Date: July 9-10, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Natcher Building, Conference Room C, 45 Center Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Michael A. Sesma, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, NIGMS, Natcher Bldg., 
Room 1AS19H, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 23, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-17171 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 10-5158.

#### Ramon Hosea McGraw, Petitioner v. Arkansas Department of Correction.

562 U.S. 906, 131 S. Ct. 393,

178 L. Ed. 2d 166,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6966.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 10-86.

#### Judy Johnson, et al., Petitioners v. Estate of Terry Gee, Jr., Deceased, by Special Administrator, Thomas Beeman.

562 U.S. 1061, 131 S. Ct. 641,

178 L. Ed. 2d 478,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9307.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 365 Fed. Appx. 679.
No. D-2554.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Stephen Lile.

562 U.S. 816, 131 S. Ct. 408,

178 L. Ed. 2d 272,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7531.

October 4, 2010.

Stephen Lile, of Law-ton, Oklahoma, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 285 ) ll-K - (I ) -9 8 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:58AM Sheet 285of 325Energ

y Informatio n Administratio n Offic e o f Energ y Market s an d En d Us

e U.S . Departmen

t o f Energ y Washington , D.C.2058

5 P. 2



# ANNUA L ENERG Y OUTLOO K 

# 198 3 Wit h Projection s t o 1995 DOE/EIA4383<83) Dist . Categor

y UC-9 8 Published : Ma y 198 4 

# A-83-2 7 11-K-(I)-9 8

Thi s repor

t was prepare d b

y th e Energ yInformatio n Administra tion , th e independen t statistica l an d analytica l agenc

y withi n th e Departmen t o

f Energy . Th e infor

matio n containe d herei n shoul d no t b e construe d a

s advocatin g o rnecessaril yreflectin g an y polic ypositio n o

f th e Departmen t o f Energ y o ran yothe rorgani zation .
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
I, Norbert E. Woodhams, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pierre Foods, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: January 18, 2005 /s/ Norbert E. Woodhams    Norbert E. Woodhams  *Chief Executive Officer*  (Principal Executive Officer)
34
# C_2014184EN.01003001.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/30

---

Order of the General Court of 3 April 2014 — CFE-CGC France Télécom-Orange v Commission

(Case T-2/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - State aid - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market on certain conditions - Trade union - Not individually affected - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 184/51

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CFE-CGC France Télécom-Orange (Paris, France) (represented by: A.-L. Lefort des Ylouses and A.-S. Gay, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, D. Grespan and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2012/540/EU of 20 December 2011 concerning State aid No C 25/2008 (ex NN 23/2008) — Reform of the method of financing the pensions of public-service employees working for France Télécom implemented by the French Republic in favour of France Télécom (OJ 2012 L 279, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of the French Republic. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of the French Republic.

| 3. | CFE-CGC France Télécom-Orange shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

CFE-CGC France Télécom-Orange shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | The French Republic shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The French Republic shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.

1

---
#### People v Brunson

4th Dept: 145 AD3d 1476 (Onondaga)

denied 3/29/17 (Stein, J.)
# Oklahoma City commander thanks employees for their years of service   

/ Published Nov. 29, 2021
Oklahoma City, 
Air Force Col. Jason Kalin took command of DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City in August and said he was excited to be a part of the team noting their strong work ethic and dedication.

With the challenges of remote and mandatory telework over the last 18 plus months, getting the workforce together to acknowledge that hard work and service has been challenging, according to Calvin Nesiba, Kalin’s chief of staff.                Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Oklahoma City Commander Air Force Col. Jason Kalin poses in his office with Darren McMahon on Sept. 16, 2021, to present him with a certificate marking his 35 years of federal service. McMahon is a customer support specialist in the Material Management Division at DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City on Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma. (Photo by Calvin Nesiba)                            Oklahoma City commander thanks employees for their years of serv                            Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Oklahoma City Commander Air Force Col. Jason Kalin poses in his office with Darren McMahon on Sept. 16, 2021, to present him with a certificate marking his 35 years of federal service. McMahon is a customer support specialist in the Material Management Division at DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City on Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma. (Photo by Calvin Nesiba)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Calvin NesibaVIRIN: 210916-D-D0441-1001

One of Kalin’s first actions as commander was to establish a monthly Commander’s Recognition Awards Program for each of his divisions.

From September to October, Kalin has personally reached to out to 61 employees with 10-40 years of federal service to recognize their length of service and outstanding performance. He offered to mail them their certificates then talk on the phone, meet in their workplace, meet in a local establishment or his office so he could present the certificates and pins. Most employees opted to come into the office to receive their certificates, many meeting Kalin for the first time since he assumed command.

LaToya Madison, a business process analyst who works in the Order Management Division, was recognized for 15 years of federal service.

“It feels really good when you dedicate so many years of your life [to your work], to get acknowledgement like this,” she said. “I could tell he really read my biography, and paid attention to my accomplishments. It made me happy.”

**TAGS**: Defense Logistics Agency at Oklahoma City, DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City, people and culture, employee recognition, Tinker Air Force Base
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shakira Myers, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 921]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered August 6, 2015, convicting her of attempted murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in *874which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]) and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.
164 A.3d 410

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KHALID KHAN (A/K/A KHALID I. KHAN), DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 23, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
No. 10-5252.

#### In re Johnny Ray Gaffney, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 266,

178 L. Ed. 2d 256,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7837,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Order entered September 20, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00546
- CV ARHONDA JONES, Appellant

V. AMERICAN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 06537
- B



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 19, 2019 third motion for an extension of time
to file a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to October 18 , 2019 . We expressly caution appellant that failure to file a brief by October 18, 2019 may result in dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1).

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
1188

Date: April 14, 2008 (M)

SUBJECT: EMERGENCY GEAR EXTENSION CABLE

ROUTING MODIFICATION

MODELS AFFECTED: SERIAL NUMBERS AFFECTED:

PA-44-180 Seminole 44-7995001 through 4496244

PA-44-180T Seminole 44-8107001 through 44-8207020

COMPLIANCE TIME: To coincide with the next regularly scheduled maintenance event, but not to

exceed the next one hundred (100) hours time in service.

APPROVAL: The technical content of this Service Bulletin has been shown to comply with the

applicable Federal Aviation Regulations and is FAA approved.

PURPOSE:

Under a specific set of operating conditions the Emergency Gear Extension

Cable may not provide adequate co-pilot left rudder pedal clearance. An

improved method of securing the Emergency Gear Extension Cable will

eliminate the possibility of interference.

This Service Bulletin requires modification to the hardware that routes and

restrains the Emergency Gear Extension Cable.

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Order and install MOD KIT – EMER GEAR EXT CABLE, Piper part number 88433-002, which provides parts

and instructions for modifications to the routing and restraining of the Emergency Gear Extension Cable, in

the vicinity of the co-pilot’s rudder pedal.

2. Make a logbook entry indicating compliance with this Service Bulletin.

Piper Aircraft, Inc.

2926 Piper Drive

Vero Beach, Florida, U.S.A. 32960

(OVER)

ATA: 3200
SERVICE BULLETIN NO. 1188

PAGE 2 OF 2

MATERIAL REQUIRED:

Qty Piper P/N Nomenclature

1 88433-002 MOD KIT – EMER GEAR EXT CABLE 

AVAILABILITY OF PARTS: Your Piper Service Facility.

EFFECTIVITY DATE: This Service Bulletin is effective upon receipt.

SUMMARY: Applicable Factory Participation is limited to new aircraft in warranty at the time

of compliance. Factory Participation will remain in effect for a period of time not to exceed 180 days from the date

of this Service Bulletin.

Please contact your Factory Authorized Piper Service Facility to make arrangements for compliance with this

Service Bulletin in accordance with the compliance time indicated.

NOTE: If you are no longer in possession of this aircraft, please forward this information to

the present owner/operator and notify the factory of address/ownership corrections.

Changes should include aircraft model, serial number, current owner's name and

address.

Corrections and/or changes should be directed to:

PIPER AIRCRAFT, INC.

Attn: Customer Service

2926 Piper Drive

Vero Beach, FL 32960
# DLA activities at Norfolk awarded VPP recertification

/ Published Dec. 10, 2015
NORFOLK, Virginia, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Primary Level Field Activities at Norfolk, Va., have been officially recertified with the prestigious Occupational Safety and Health Administration Voluntary Protection Program Star site status.  DLA activities at Norfolk include Distribution, Disposition Services, and Document Services.

The VPP Star site designation recognizes employers and employees who demonstrate exemplary achievement in the prevention and control of occupational safety and health hazards and the development, implementation and continuous improvement of their safety and health management systems.

Navy Capt. Harry Thetford, commander of the Distribution activity, was pleased to see the DLA team receive recertification.  “This award is not given to everyone.  Our entire workforce has put forth tremendous effort to once again receive Star status.”  

The field activities went through a rigorous three-stage process to receive the Star, and were the second in DLA to receive the prestigious award, after Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin, Calif.

While the OSHA team was on-hand in Norfolk for the recertification audit, the Distribution staff treated them to a tour of the USS Wasp (LHD 1).  “We wanted to help them understand the importance of the job our employees do day-in and day-out,” said Thetford.

OSHA sites that achieve VPP recognition must perform a self-assessment each year and also go through a recertification process to maintain VPP status every three years.

“It is important for us to continue to all work as ‘One DLA’ to achieve a safe work environment, continue our commitment to safety, and to foster the right culture across the network,” said Thetford.