alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Irons and putters were swinging during annual golf tournament hosted by DLA Aviation at OKC

/ Published April 28, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
On a sunny and surprisingly warm early April day, close to 100 people, making up 24 teams, took part in the 13th annual Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Golf Classic played at Choctaw Creek Golf Course in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma April 9.

DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City’s Sunshine Club sponsored the outing, which was also open to the public. The club was formed in 2009 as a morale building organization by aviation employees working in Oklahoma City on Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma.

Material Expediter Supervisor Keith Dietz is the club’s president. He said funds raised though events like the golf tournament, go toward future employee enrichment activities as well many local charities including the Boys & Girls Club and the Ronald McDonald House Foundation.

Tournament participants not only got a chance to practice their swings and lay claims to bragging rights for a year, but some also walked away with prizes like an indoor grill and gift certificates from local restaurants.
# C_2013260EN.01002602.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/26

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma (Italia) lodged on 24 June 2013 — Cristiano Blanco v Agenzia delle Entrate

(Case C-344/13)

2013/C 260/46

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Cristiano Blanco

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale I di Roma — Ufficio Controlli

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is it incompatible with Article 49 of the EC Treaty for persons resident in Italy to be required to declare for tax purposes, and be liable for tax on, winnings obtained from casinos in Member States of the European Union, as provided for by Article 67(1)(d) of Presidential Decree No 917 of 22.12.1986 (‘the TUIR’), or must this be regarded as justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health, pursuant to Article 46 of the EC Treaty?

---
# C_2015406EN.01002901.xml

| 7.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 October 2015 — Enosi Mastichoparagogon v OHIM — Gaba International (ELMA)

(Case T-309/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark ELMA - Earlier Community word mark ELMEX - Refusal to register - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 406/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou (Chios, Greece) (represented by: A.-E. Malami, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Gaba International Holding GmbH (Therwil, Switzerland) (represented by: G. Schindler, M. Zintler and P. Nagel, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 March 2013 (Case R 1539/2012-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Gaba International Holding GmbH and Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 2263, 3.8.2013.

---
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2010 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: November 15, 2010/s/ Richard L. Feinstein
Richard L. Feinstein
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014045EN.01004702.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/47

---

Action brought on 23 December 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-126/13)

2014/C 45/89

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the PMO to pay the family allowances directly to the mother of the applicant’s daughter, with retroactive effect to 1 October 2012

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 21 May 2013 by which the PMO informs the applicant of its decision to pay the family allowances, including the household allowance, the dependent child allowance and the education allowance, directly to the mother of his daughter, retroactively from 1 October 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 21 May 2013 by which the PMO informs the applicant of its decision to pay the family allowances, including the household allowance, the dependent child allowance and the education allowance, directly to the mother of his daughter, retroactively from 1 October 2012;

| — | Annul the decision adopted on 23 September 2013 rejecting the applicant’s claim; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision adopted on 23 September 2013 rejecting the applicant’s claim;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the applicant the entirely of the sums due in respect of family allowances unduly withheld since 1 October 2012 until the date of execution of the judgment to be give in this case, together with late-payment interest calculated at the rate of 4 % per annum from 1 October 2012 until payment in full; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the applicant the entirely of the sums due in respect of family allowances unduly withheld since 1 October 2012 until the date of execution of the judgment to be give in this case, together with late-payment interest calculated at the rate of 4 % per annum from 1 October 2012 until payment in full;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

NEHEMIAH REID and ENID REID
, Appellant s ,

v.

HURRICANE METAL SUPPLY, LLC and HIGHLANDER ROOFING, INC.
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 19

- 1314

[ October 3, 2019 ]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; David A. Haimes , Judge; L.T. Case No.

CACE 14

- 016288

.

Erik B. Espinosa of The Law Offices of Erik B. Espinosa, P.A., Sunrise, for appellants.

Richard J. Delg ado of Law Office of Delgado & Delgado, P.A., Hialeah, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, D AMOORGIAN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34370-34371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16721]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM 98-2127-002]

Cove Point LNG Limited Partnership; Notice of compliance filing

June 18, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 10, 1998, Cove Point LNG Limited 
Partnership (Cove Point) tendered for fling to become a part of Cove 
Point's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, Third Revised 
Sheet No. 99, to be effective July 10, 1998.
    Cove Point states that this tariff sheet is being filed in order to 
comply with the Commission's letter order issued in the above captioned 
proceedings on June 1, 1998, to correct an error in reference to a 
Storage Turnover Provision.
    Cove Point states that copies of the filing were served upon Cove 
Point's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protests 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and

[[Page 34371]]

Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies 
if this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers.
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16721 Filed 6-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
No. 10-6557.

#### Helodoro Velasquez-Torrez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 990, 131 S. Ct. 438,

178 L. Ed. 2d 339,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8223.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 609 F.3d 743.
# Contingency planner rewarded for role in joint task force

/ Published Nov. 6, 2015
HATTIESBURG, Mississippi, Army’s coverage of the event
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2408 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2408

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the 
      nonrecognition of gain on long-term real property which is 
   involuntarily converted as the result of the exercise of eminent 
 domain, without regard to whether the replacement property is similar 
                            or of like kind.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 19 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

 Ms. Moseley-Braun introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the 
      nonrecognition of gain on long-term real property which is 
   involuntarily converted as the result of the exercise of eminent 
 domain, without regard to whether the replacement property is similar 
                            or of like kind.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NONRECOGNITION TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY 
              INVOLUNTARILY CONVERTED AS RESULT OF EXERCISE OF EMINENT 
              DOMAIN.

    (a) In General.--Section 1033 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to involuntary conversions) is amended by redesignating 
subsection (i) as subsection (j), and by inserting after subsection (h) 
the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Condemnation of Real Property Held for at Least 10 Years.--
For purposes of subsection (a), if real property held by the taxpayer 
for at least 10 years is (as the result of its seizure, requisition, or 
condemnation, or threat or imminence thereof) compulsorily or 
involuntarily converted, any other property shall (at the election of 
the taxpayer) be treated as property similar or related in service or 
use to the property so converted.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to dispositions of converted property occurring on or after 
October 1, 1991.
                                 <all>
```
----

|   | (1)    | U.S.                  Subsidiary Wholly Owned by LaserCard Corporation:                 |                                     |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                                                                    |                                     |   |
|   |   | Name of Subsidiary                                                                      | State                  of Incorporation  |   |
|   |   |                                                                                    |                                     |   |
|   |   | LaserCard Corporation                                                                   | California                               |   |
|   |   |                                                                                    |                                     |   |
|   | (2)    | Foreign Subsidiary Wholly Owned by                LaserCard                Corporation: |                                     |   |
|   |   |                                                                                    |                                     |   |
|   |   | Name of Subsidiary                                                                      | Nation                  of Incorporation |   |
|   |   |                                                                                    |                                     |   |
|   |   | Challenge Card Design Plastikkarten                GmbH                                 | Germany                                  |   |
* Judge King did not participate in consideration of this

case. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (1994).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6381

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PAUL ANDERSON ROBERTS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-96-81, CA-97-517-2)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING,* Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Anderson Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Paul Anderson Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Roberts, Nos. CR-96-81;

CA-97-517-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 4, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 10M46.

#### Eddie Taylor, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1041, 131 S. Ct. 623,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8977.

178 L. Ed. 2d 431,

November 15, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2119 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2119

To prohibit the imposition of additional fees for attendance by United 
     States citizens at the United States Merchant Marine Academy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 17 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

   Mr. Breaux (for himself, Mr. Lott, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Inouye, Mr. 
Stevens, Mr. D'Amato, and Mr. Moynihan) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the imposition of additional fees for attendance by United 
     States citizens at the United States Merchant Marine Academy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL CHARGES OR FEES FOR 
              ATTENDANCE AT THE UNITED STATES MERCHANT MARINE ACADEMY.

    (a) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (b), no charge 
or fee for tuition, room, or board for attendance by United States 
citizens at the United States Merchant Marine Academy may be imposed.
    (b) Exception.--The prohibition specified in subsection (a) shall 
not apply with respect to any item or service provided to midshipmen at 
the United States Merchant Marine Academy for which a charge or fee is 
imposed as of the date of the enactment of this Act. The Secretary of 
Transportation shall notify the Congress of any change made by the 
United States Merchant Marine Academy in the amount of a charge or fee 
authorized under this subsection.

                                 <all>
```
No. 10-173.

#### Ralph T. Byrd, et ux., Petitioners v. James M. Hoffman, et al.

562 U.S. 962, 131 S. Ct. 463,

178 L. Ed. 2d 288,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8093.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 352 Fed. Appx. 775.
#### Reinlasoder v. City of Colstrip

DA 16-0690

05/09/17

2017 MT 114N

Affirmed

Dist. 13 (Yellowstone)
No. 10-6367.

#### Jorge O. Zavala-Rosales, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 975, 131 S. Ct. 494,

178 L. Ed. 2d 312,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7925.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 316.
No. 10-335.

#### Pearl Cottier, et al., Petitioners v. City of Martin, South Dakota, et al.

562 U.S. 1044, 131 S. Ct. 598,

178 L. Ed. 2d 435,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8887.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 604 F.3d 553.
#### Green Tree Servicing Mortg. Co. v. Rauso; Rauso, In re

05/10/2016

30 MAL (2016)

Denied

No. 2157 EDA 2015
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,296]


Doehler-Jarvis, Toledo, OH; Notice of Negative Determination 
Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated May 5, 1998, the United Automobile, Aerospace, 
Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Local 1058, requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative 
determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the 
subject firm. The denial notice applicable to workers of the subject 
firm located in Toledo, Ohio, was signed on April 8, 1998 and published 
in the Federal Register on May 6, 1998 (63 FR 25081).
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.
    The TAA petition, filed on behalf of workers of Doehler-Jarvis, 
Toledo, Ohio, producing transmission cases was denied based on the 
finding that the ``contributed importantly'' group eligibility 
requirement of Section 222(3) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, was 
not met. The ``contributed importantly'' test is generally demonstrated 
through a survey of the workers' firm's customers. None of the Doehler-
Jarvis customers reported increased import purchases while decreasing 
purchases of transmission cases from the Toledo plant.
    In support of their application for reconsideration, the UAW Local 
1058 submitted documents concerning a foreign company that will supply 
transmission cases to one of the major Doehler-Jarvis customers. A 
follow-up with this customer confirms that there were no imports of 
transmission cases during the time period relevant to the petition 
investigation. The customer reported that once Doehler-Jarvis made the 
announcement to close the Toledo production facility, they were 
required to pursue other suppliers of transmission cases.

Conclusion

    After review of the application and investigative findings, I 
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law 
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department 
of Labor's prior decisions. Accordingly, the application is denied.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 10th day of June 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-16547 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M