alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Echelon Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-62045, 333-44198, 333-88880, 333-110679, 333-125395, and 333-149783) of Echelon Corporation of our report dated March 17, 2008, except as to Note 2, which is as of May 16, 2008, with respect tothe consolidated balance sheets of Echelon Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule, and our report dated March 17, 2008, except as to the third through sixth paragraphs of Management’s Annual Report on InternalControl over Financial Reporting (as restated), which are as of May 16, 2008, with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. 

Our report dated March 17, 2008, except as to the third through sixth paragraphs of Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (asRestated), which are as of May 16, 2008, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, expresses our opinion that Echelon Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2007, because of the effect of material weaknesses on the achievement of objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states that material weaknesses existed in the accounting forstock-based compensation and leases. 

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the consolidated financial statements as ofDecember 31, 2007 and 2006, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, have been restated. 

As discussed in Note1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), *Share-Based Paymen*t. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Mountain View, California 

May 16, 2008
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2667 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make employers of spouses 

of military personnel eligible for the work opportunity credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2019 

Mr. CARTER of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

employers of spouses of military personnel eligible for 

the work opportunity credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Spouses Em5 ployment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF SPOUSES OF MILITARY PERSONNEL 

7 FOR THE WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (I), by striking the period 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2667 IH

1 at the end of subparagraph (J) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and 

2 by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(K) a qualified military spouse.’’. 

4 (b) QUALIFIED MILITARY SPOUSE.—Subsection (d) 

5 of section 51 of such Code is amended by redesignating 

6 paragraphs (12) through (15) as paragraphs (13) through 

7 (16), respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (9) the 

8 following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(11) QUALIFIED MILITARY SPOUSE.—The 

10 term ‘qualified military spouse’ means any individual 

11 who is certified by the designated local agency as 

12 being a spouse (determined as of the hiring date) of 

13 a member of the Armed Forces of the United States 

14 who is serving on a period of extended active duty 

15 which includes the hiring date. For purposes of the 

16 preceding sentence, the term ‘extended active duty’ 

17 means any period of active duty pursuant to a call 

18 or order to such duty for a period in excess of 90 

19 days or for an indefinite period.’’. 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made this 

21 section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after the 

22 date of the enactment of this Act to individuals who begin 

23 work for the employer after such date. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
#### Lourdes Guilbe, Respondent, v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 547]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered March 29, 2016, which, in this action for personal injuries sustained in a slip and fall, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it was an out-of-possession landlord. The lease provisions cited by defendant show that it did not have a contractual obligation to maintain or repair the premises. Plaintiff argues that the lease attached to defendant’s summary judgment motion expired before plaintiff’s accident, and thus defendant cannot rely on those provisions. However, defendant’s senior property representative testified that there was a restated lease agreement in effect at the time of plaintiff’s accident, which did not change defendant’s obligations regarding repairs and maintenance of the premises. The restated lease agreement that was subsequently submitted confirmed the testimony *(see Sapp v S.J.C. 308 Lenox Ave. Family L.P.,*150 AD3d 525, 527-528 [1st Dept 2017]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact since she did not demonstrate that the allegedly defective condition that caused her fall constituted a structural or design defect contrary to a specific statutory provision *(see Ross v Betty G. Reader Revocable Trust,*86 AD3d 419, 420 [1st Dept 2011]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Gesmer and Singh, JJ.
# C_2015026EN.01003001.xml

| 26.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/30

---

Order of the General Court of 10 November 2014 — Evangelou v Commission and ECB

(Case T-292/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment and compensation - Stability support programme for Cyprus - Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the ESM - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Causal link - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 026/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Christos Evangelou (Derynia, Cyprus); and Yvonne Evangelou (Derynia) (represented by: C. Paschalides, Solicitor, and A. Paschalides, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders and J.-P. Keppenne, Agents); and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, Agents, and by W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

First, application for annulment of paragraphs 1.23 to 1.27 of the Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) on 26 April 2013, and, second, for compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the inclusion of paragraphs 1.23 to 1.27 in the Memorandum of Understanding and an infringement of the Commission’s supervisory obligation.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Christos Evangelou and Ms Yvonne Evangelou shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Christos Evangelou and Ms Yvonne Evangelou shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.

1

---
EXHIBIT23.2 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 toRegistration Statement No. 333-112929 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-52782 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-63602 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-72408 on Form S-3, and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to RegistrationStatement Nos. 33-53563 and 33-53563-01 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 24, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Duquesne Light Company and management’s report on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duquesne Light Company for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

March 28, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas R.
McMahon, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/S/ THOMAS R. MCMAHON                                
|Thomas R. McMahon                                    
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|May 12, 2011
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6969

JIMMY CLAYTON WALKER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J N BROWNING; ROBERTA LAWSON; CITY OF

GREENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-04-946-20AK-6)

Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 24, 2004

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Clayton Walker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Clayton Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge

recommended that relief be denied and advised Walker that failure

to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive

appellate review of a district court order based upon the

recommendation. Despite this warning, Walker failed to object to

the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See

Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Walker has waived appellate

review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Scott E. Willkomm, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Scott E. Willkomm

Scott E. Willkomm
President
May 8, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and will be retained by
Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Latisia N. Pagan, Appellant, v Daunte C. Gray, Respondent.

[48 NYS3d 750]

Appeal by the father from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Dean T. Kusakabe, J.), dated September 29, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a hearing, in effect, denied his petition to modify a prior visitation order of that court (Bernard J. Graham, J.) dated November 16, 2009, by, in effect, increasing his visitation, and granted that branch of the mother’s petition which was, in effect, to modify the prior visitation order by limiting his visitation.

Ordered that the order dated September 29, 2015, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

*812An existing visitation order may be modified only “upon a showing that there has been a subsequent change of circumstances and modification is required” (Family Ct Act § 467 [b] [ii]; see *Matter of Boggio v Boggio,*96 AD3d 834, 835 [2012]). The paramount concern in any custody or visitation determination is the best interests of the child, under the totality of circumstances (see *Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167 [1982]; *Matter of Boggio v Boggio,*96 AD3d at 835). The determination of visitation issues is entrusted to the sound discretion of the Family Court and will not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see *Matter of Boggio v Boggio,*96 AD3d at 835; *Matter of Mohabir v Singh,*78 AD3d 1056 [2010]).

Here, the Family Court’s determination that the mother satisfied her burden of demonstrating that there existed a change in circumstances warranting a reduction in the amount of visitation time allowed to the father is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record. The father’s repeated failure to visit or communicate with the subject children over an extended period of time constituted a change of circumstances warranting modification of the visitation provisions set forth in a 2009 visitation order. Further, the record supports the court’s determination that it would be in the best interests of the children for visitation to resume incrementally with the father by permitting him unsupervised daytime visitation on Sundays, which could expand to holiday and summertime visitations upon the parties’ consent. We note that the court also gave appropriate weight to the wishes of the children *(see Matter of Ottaviano v Ippolito,*132 AD3d 681 [2015]; *Matter of Boggio v Boggio,*96 AD3d at 835).

Hall, J.P., Austin, Sgroi and Connolly, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Rayside, Appellant.

[53 NYS3d 553]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), rendered October 7, 2015, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]). Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Dillon, J.P., Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.
# San Joaquin engages in healthy competition for audit readiness

/ Published Aug. 20, 2015
SAN JOAQUIN, California, 
Employees of DLA Distribution San Joaquin’s Freight Terminal incorporated audit preparedness into a recent stand-up morning meeting by playing Audit Readiness Jeopardy. Three teams competed against each other to be crowned as the Audit Readiness Jeopardy champions.

San Joaquin’s former Audit Readiness program manager Air Force Maj. Patrick Carpizo originally developed the audit readiness-themed game, which resembles the popular television series “Jeopardy.”

“I took the opportunity to incorporate audit readiness information into a Jeopardy game during the leadership forum to ensure all had fun during my last interaction with the leaders of our organization,” said Carpizo. “This game creates healthy competition and teamwork throughout the organization while retaining important audit readiness information.”

The game’s format consisted of six categories, all relating directly to audit readiness: Audit Readiness Acronyms, Job Breakdown Sheet Symbols, Compliance, Audit Readiness Advocates, Audit Readiness Improvement Plan, and Potpourri.

According to the Freight Terminal branch chief Henry Martin, the competition was well received by employees, who had a great time working together while retaining invaluable audit readiness information.

“This game took off like a wild fire and has been incorporated into the various divisions across the installation, providing deliberate audit readiness information in preparation for our upcoming 2016 Independent Public Accountant Audit,” said Martin.
|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                  
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Lithuania (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                  
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Lithuania (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 11.21  | 12.21  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 99-1



Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63

of Title 18 of the United States Code



I, James R. Bazet, the chief executive officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the attached Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.



/S/    JAMES R.
BAZETJames R. Bazet March 28, 2003
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER








18 U.S.C.
Certification of Jon A. Ramsey


Interim
Chief Financial Officer of


Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and
Subsidiaries, a Kansas corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended
February 3, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:





(a) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and;





(b) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.  and Subsidiaries and will be retained by
Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and Subsidiaries and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  April
28, 2008


By: /s/ Jon A. Ramsey


Jon
A. Ramsey


Interim
Chief Financial Officer