alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1894

LEWIS R. DODDS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

COMMERCIAL ENERGIES, INCORPORATED; GREGORY

KELLAM SCOTT,

Plaintiffs,

versus

UNITED AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation;

METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY;

JANELLE MCARTHUR; CHRISTOPHER D. SMEAL; R. P.

HARRIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CA-93-120-A)

Submitted: September 10, 1996 Decided: September 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Lewis R. Dodds, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Anne Newman, HUNTON &

WILLIAMS, Washington, D.C.; Thomas J. Byrne, Barry Alan Schwartz,

BYRNE, KIELY & WHITE, Denver, Colorado, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) (1994) claim. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Dodds v. United Airlines, Inc., No. CA-93-120-A (E.D. Va.

Mar. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-6790.

#### William Thomas Mason, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 548,

178 L. Ed. 2d 402,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8424.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15564]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental Research; Notice of Closed Meeting 
of the National Institute of Dental Research Special Grants Review 
Committee

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental Research Special 
Grants Review Committee.
    Date: June 18-19, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Place: Hilton Hotel, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, Maryland 
20877.
    Contact Person: Dr. William Gartland, Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIDR Special Grants Review Committee, Natcher 
Building, Room 4AN-38E, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2372.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
contract proposals.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the extramural research review cycle.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Dental 
Research Institute; National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-15564 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of DirectorsDRS Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (No. 333-14487, 333-119977, 333-83700and 333-136909) on Form S-8, in the registration statement (No. 333-130926)on Form S-3 and in the registration statement (No. 333-129948)on Form S-4 of DRS Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated May 29,2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of DRS Technologies, Inc.and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the relatedconsolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and comprehensiveearnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31,2007, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31,2007, which reports appear in the March 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-Kof DRS Technologies, Inc.

Our report onthe consolidated financial statements refers to the Company’s adoption of theprovisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” effective April 1, 2006, and theadoption of SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined BenefitPension and Other Postretirement Plans, an Amendment of FASB StatementsNo. 87, 88, 106 and 132R,” effective at the end of fiscal 2007.

| /s/ KPMG LLP            |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Short Hills, New Jersey |   |
| May 29, 2007       |   |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-51061

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ESTEBAN FLORES-RUBIO, also known as Jose Luis Medina-Flores,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:12-CR-1551-1

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Esteban Flores-Rubio appeals from his conviction and sentence for illegal

reentry following removal from the United States. He contends that his

sentence of supervised release was procedurally and substantively unreasonable

because the district court did not consider U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c) and its

accompanying commentary and failed to explicitly find that the sentence was

justified by the need for an extra measure of deterrence.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 10, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-51061 Document: 00512302769 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/10/2013
No. 12-51061

Flores-Rubio did not raise his arguments in the district court, so our

review is for plain error. See United States v. Dominguez-Alvarado, 695 F.3d

324, 327 (5th Cir. 2012). Most of the district court’s comments at sentencing

were directed at Flores-Rubio’s long-running cycle of entering the United States,

committing crimes, being imprisoned, being removed, then illegally reentering

the United States and beginning the cycle over again. The district court

admonished Flores-Rubio to avoid the temptation to return to this country, as

a return to the United States would result in a new term of imprisonment. 

Flores-Rubio had been removed from the United States four times, and he had

a lengthy and serious criminal history in this country. Although the district

court did not explicitly find that the particular facts of Flores-Rubio’s case

warranted a sentence of supervised release, the district court’s explanation was

adequate to support the supervised release sentence. See United States v.

Cancino-Trinidad, 710 F.3d 601, 607 (5th Cir. 2013).

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-51061 Document: 00512302769 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/10/2013
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Giovanny F. Laguan and Marina Del T. Martinez v. Hilary J. Lloyd and Kimberly A. Lloyd

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0693

- CV

Trial court case number: 12

- DCV

- 202692

Trial court: 240th District C our t of Fort Bend County

On February 10, 2015, t his Court o rdered the appellants to provide written

evidence f

rom the court reporter

, within 15 days

, showing that appellant s ha d requested

and paid

, or made arrangements to pay

, for the reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 34.6(b) (1), (2) , 35.3(b)(2), (3), (c), 37.3(c) (1), (2)

. The February 10th Order further

stated that i f appellants fail ed to timely provide such evidence , t his Court w ould consider and decide only those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a

decision

. See id. at 37.3(c).

On February 11, 2015, the court reporter filed an information sheet stating that she

had just received partial payment for the reporter’s record on January 30, 2015, from appellant Laguan. However, since that date, there has been neither a further update from the court reporter regarding receipt of full payment f or the reporter’s record, which has not been filed, nor have the appellants filed an extension of time to pay for th at record.

Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide only those issues or p oints that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(c). Appellants’

brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order

. See id. at 2,

3 8.6(a)

. Appellees’ brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of appellants’ brief. See id. at 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 28, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINAANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR
ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>   U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,358,750
<SECURITIES>                                 1,160,265
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,193,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                   263,763
<INVENTORY>                                  1,503,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,276,296
<PP&E>                                       4,868,548
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,764,901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,692,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,240,930
<BONDS>                                        743,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,000
<COMMON>                                       157,232
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,383,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,692,894
<SALES>                                      7,197,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,046,832
<CGS>                                        4,697,438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,725,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,191,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                178,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,175
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            140,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   140,875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Agency wins 5 Value Engineering Awards

/ Published June 30, 2016
Arlington, VIRGINIA, One Defense Logistics Agency employee and four teams were awarded Department of Defense Value Engineering Achievement Awards for fiscal 2015 at a Pentagon ceremony, June 28. Value engineering is an organized effort using cost, value and quality analyses to improve mission capabilities of DoD systems, equipment, facilities, procedures and supplies. The Value Engineering Achievement Awards, presented by the assistant secretary of defense for systems engineering, highlight individual and team achievements in VE processes.“This year’s recipients of VE Achievement Awards have executed superior VE-related efforts, providing more capability to the warfighter through cost savings or cost avoidances, quality improvements, and efficiencies to the Department,” Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, Frank Kendall wrote in the memo announcing the winners. DLA’s Value Management Program, which includes the agency’s value engineering efforts, is aimed at reducing the cost of materials while retaining or improving quality, reliability and function. During fiscal 2015, DLA saved more than $307 million through the Value Management program. Award winners were chosen from each DoD component in five categories: program/project, individual, team, organization and contractor. Additional special awards recognized applications or approaches that expanded the scope of value engineering. DLA’s winners were:
- Project: Aviation Engineering Breakout Project (DLA Aviation)
- Individual: Amelia Walling (DLA Land and Maritime)
- Team: Should Cost/Price Challenge Team (DLA Aviation)
- Organization: DLA Land and Maritime Value Management Program
- Special Achievement: DLA Aviation
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I,
      Catherine Thompson, Chief Financial Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer
      of Matrix Resource Holdings, Inc. (The "Registrant"), do hereby certify in
      accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, to which this


certification
      is attached as an exhibit (The "Report"), fully complies


with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(A) of The Securities Exchange Act


of
      1934
      (15 U.S.C. 78M);





And





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all


material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations


of
      the
      registrant.





Date:
      October 13, 2006





/s/
      Catherine Thompson


----------------------


Catherine
      Thompson


Chief
      Financial Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer
Energy Americas at Houston banks on commercial practices
 
  By DLA Energy Americas at Houston
      DLA Energy Americas at Houston
# C_2016048EN.01004601.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Perfetti Van Melle Benelux v OHIM — Intercontinental Great Brands (TRIDENT PURE)

(Case T-491/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark TRIDENT PURE - Earlier Community, national, international and Benelux figurative and word marks PURE WHITE, mentos PURE FRESH PURE BREATH, PURE, PURE FRESH, mentos PURE FRESH and mentos PURE WHITE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 048/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Perfetti Van Melle Benelux BV (Breda, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Perani, G. Ghisletti and F. Braga, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Intercontinental Great Brands LLC (East Hanover, New Jersey, United States) (represented by: M. Haak, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 July 2013 (Case R 706/2012-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Perfetti Van Melle Benelux BV and Kraft Foods Global Brands LLC.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Perfetti Van Melle Benelux BV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Perfetti Van Melle Benelux BV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.

1

---
# Retired Army Maj. Gen. Steve Stivers

/ Published May 3, 2021

Raised in Ripley, Ohio, Steve Stivers learned from his mother and father the importance of family, hard work and public service, which have been the values he has carried with him throughout his life.

In May 2021, he was selected to lead the Ohio Chamber of Commerce as President and CEO. The Ohio Chamber of Commerce is the state’s leading business organization whose mission it is to aggressively champion free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all Ohioans. In addition to his responsibilities as President and CEO, Stivers works with legislators, business leaders and government officials every day on issues affecting Ohio Chamber member companies.

Prior to joining the Ohio Chamber, Stivers represented Ohio’s 15th Congressional District from 2011 until May 16, 2021. He served on the Financial Services Committee and was the Ranking Member on the Subcommittee on Housing, Community Development, and Insurance.

In January 2003, he was appointed to the Ohio Senate and successfully ran for a full term in 2004. He was assigned to various committees and chaired Insurance, Commerce and Labor. He served in the Ohio Senate until 2008. Throughout his career, Steve Stivers has led the way supporting programs and initiatives to encourage job creation, promote economic development, and put our country’s fiscal house in order. A career soldier, Stivers has served over 30 years in the Ohio Army National Guard and holds the rank of Major General.

He served the United States overseas during Operation Iraqi Freedom in Kuwait, Iraq, Qatar and Djibouti where he led 400 soldiers and contractors and is proud that each and every one returned home safely to the United States. Stivers received the Bronze Star for his leadership throughout the deployment. Stivers received both his bachelor’s degree and his MBA from The Ohio State University and a master’s degree in strategic studies from the Army War College. He resides in Upper Arlington with his wife, Karen, and children, Sarah and Sam.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2021

No. 04-20-00611-CV

INTEREST OF L.J.L. AND J.W.L., MINOR CHILDREN,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-08129

Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Unopposed Motion to Exceed Page/Word Limit in Appellee’s brief is hereby 

GRANTED.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Bray, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 920]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gubbay, J.), rendered September 16, 2015, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]). Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Rivera, J.P., Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<LEGEND>
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               jan-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    apr-30-2000
<CASH>                                  801,486
<SECURITIES>                            100,000
<RECEIVABLES>                           275,206
<ALLOWANCES>                            275,206
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        901,486
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          905,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   4,116,788
<BONDS>                                 190,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                58,771
<OTHER-SE>                              (3,460,015)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            905,544
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           4,121,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        (183)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      8,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (4,129,825)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (4,129,825)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.74)



</TABLE>
# Energy commander, French fuel service discuss regional support, experience sharing

/ Published Dec. 16, 2015
FORT LEE, Virginia, visited DLA Energy headquarters