alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PSA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,938
<SECURITIES>                                       967
<RECEIVABLES>                                      872
<ALLOWANCES>                                        29
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,030
<PP&E>                                           3,506
<DEPRECIATION>                                     265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,459
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,154
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,726
<CGS>                                            3,965
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    90
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (21)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,022)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Carmen P., Appellant, v Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[50 NYS3d 275]

Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Susan K. Knipps, J.), entered on or about March 29, 2016, which granted the attorney for the children’s motion to dismiss with prejudice the petition for custody of the subject children brought pursuant to article 6 of the Family Court Act, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

Petitioner’s request for custody of the subject children is now moot as the children’s adoption by their foster parent was finalized in May 2016 (see *Matter of Alexis C. [Jacqueline A.],*99 AD3d 542, 543 [1st Dept 2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 856 [2013]; *Matter of Iyanna KK. [Edward KK.],*141 AD3d 885, 886 [3d Dept 2016]). In any event, the Family Court properly dismissed the petition for lack of standing, as the children had already been freed for adoption (see *Matter of Arnetta S. v Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y.,*186 AD2d 519 [1st Dept 1992]).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6860

LAFAYETTE T. EDWARDS, SR., 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

ISLE OF WIGHT CIRCUIT COURT, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:08-cv-00396-GBL-TCB) 

Submitted: October 17, 2008 Decided: October 29, 2008 

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Lafayette T. Edwards, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Lafayette T. Edwards, Sr., seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition for failing to exhaust state 

remedies. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We 

have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Edwards 

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND THE CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         748,116
<SECURITIES>                                 5,397,218
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,050,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                   166,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,212,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,983,466
<PP&E>                                       3,683,718
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,395,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,155,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,213,693
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       601,156
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,239,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,155,973
<SALES>                                      9,065,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,065,057
<CGS>                                        3,119,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,119,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,586,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,359,345
<INCOME-TAX>                                   755,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,604,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,604,345
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

F:rom: ,, :·~~~sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Dear Sir, 

stuart maki <maki25944@centurylink.net> 

Friday, August 17, 2012 2:21PM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Brainerd MN. Regional Airport 

We are emailing you to urge you to choose Sky West airline to serve the Brainerd regional airport. 

Regards, 

Stuart&Christine Maki 

Maki25944@centurylink.net 

25944 455th Pl. 

Aitkin, MN. 56431 

1
II

Calendar No. 661

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2395

To designate the United States Federal Building and Courthouse in Detroit,

Michigan, as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Federal Building and Courthouse’’,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 16 (legislative day, AUGUST 11), 1994

Mr. RIEGLE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. BAUCUS, with amendments and an amendment to the title

[Omit the part struck through]

A BILL

To designate the United States Federal Building and Courthouse in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Federal Building and Courthouse’’, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. THEODORE LEVIN FEDERAL BUILDING AND

4 COURTHOUSE.

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The courthouse facility lo6 cated at 231 West Lafayette, in Detroit, Michigan, shall
2

•S 2395 RS

1 be known and designated as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Federal

2 Building and Courthouse’’.

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

5 States to the courthouse facility referred to in subsection

6 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Theodore

7 Levin Federal Building and Courthouse’’.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘To designate the

United States Courthouse in Detroit, Michigan, as the

‘Theodore Levin Courthouse’, and for other purposes.’’.

Calendar No. 661

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2395

A BILL

To designate the United States Federal Building

house’’, and for other purposes.‘‘Theodore Levin Federal Building and Courtand Courthouse in Detroit, Michigan, as the

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported with amendments and an amendment to the

title
No. D-2563.

#### In the Matter of Joseph Cosmas Steinkrauss.

562 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 589,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8804.

178 L. Ed. 2d 429,

November 8, 2010.

Joseph Cosmas Steinkrauss, of Medford, Massachusetts, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys permitted to the practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on October 4, 2010, is discharged.
Interview with Lisa Jung, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy
 
  By DLA Energy Public Affairs
  *Editor’s note: Lisa Jung, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, spoke to DLA Energy public affairs during the 2019 Worldwide Energy Conference, May 22.* **1.    What is your role/responsibility in Department of Defense Energy?**
I am the policy lead for the Department of Defense’s global energy portfolio. The mission of my office is to “sustain warfighting readiness and lethality by providing all energy-related policy and governance for programs and activities that enable resilient, efficient and cyber-secure energy for the Joint Forces, weapons systems and installations.” Simply put, my office works to ensure our Warfighters have the energy they need to support their military operations to ensure the mission. **2.    How important is energy to the Warfighter?**
Energy is a critical enabler for the Warfighter and the DoD is the nation’s largest consumer of energy. In fiscal year 2018, the department consumed over 85 million barrels of fuel to power ships, aircraft, combat vehicles and contingency bases at a cost of more than $9 billion. At our more than 500 worldwide military installations, the department spent nearly $3.5 billion last fiscal year on energy to power over 585,000 facilities and 160,000 non-tactical vehicles. Without energy, the DoD components cannot execute their missions. **3.    How does DLA Energy support the DoD Energy strategy including the department’s future operational and facility energy needs?**
For our installations, DLA Energy plays a critical role in helping the department acquire the necessary power and services it needs to strengthen its energy assurance posture. Whether through appropriated or third party financed programs, DLA Energy is helping our installations enhance their energy performance and cost effectiveness in support of our broader energy resilience and cybersecurity goals.
For our forces, DLA Energy is the global provider of bulk petroleum fuel for the department. They provide for the procurement and distribution of fuel as well as the management of fuel storage, ensuring our Warfighters have the fuel they need “on time, on target, and within budget.” **4.    Is there anything else you would like to add?**
I would like to thank DLA Energy for all the great work that it does every day to enable our Warfighters. I look forward to a continued partnership with them as we navigate through and work together to resolve complex energy issues in these unprecedented times.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated March 31, 2008,accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of saidreport in the registration statements of Cobra Electronics Corporation on Form S-8 Nos. 333-63501 (effective September 16, 1998), 333-42164 (effective July 25, 2000), 333-42166 (effective July 25, 2000) and 333-91078 (effectiveJune 24, 2002). 

/S/    GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 31, 2008
No. 10-5425.

#### Richard Ellison, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 921, 131 S. Ct. 295,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7239.

178 L. Ed. 2d 193,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 632 F.3d 727.
# C_2014380EN.01001202.xml

| 27.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/12

---

Order of the Court of 2 September 2014 — Borghezio v Parliament

(Case T-336/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Declaration of the President of the European Parliament, in plenary session, informing the assembly of the exclusion of an MEP from the political group to which he was attached - Act not amenable to review - Action manifestly inadmissible))

2014/C 380/16

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mario Borghezio (Turin, Italy) (represented by: H. Laquay, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, N. Görlitz and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Parliament, in the form of a declaration of its President on 10 July 2013, in plenary session, according to which the applicant was, since 3 June 2013, sitting as a non-attached MEP, as a result of his exclusion from the political group ‘Europe of Freedom & Democracy’ as from that date.

Operative part

Operative part

| 1) | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The action is dismissed.

| 2) | Mr Mario Borghezio shall bear his own costs, and pay those of the European Parliament, including those incurred in the interim relief proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Mr Mario Borghezio shall bear his own costs, and pay those of the European Parliament, including those incurred in the interim relief proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.

1

---
DLA delivers Christmas cheer to deployed service members
 
  By Michael Tuttle, Troop Support
# Partners in Protection:  Safety Tips on Barbecuing

/ Published July 11, 2016
RICHMOND, Va., 
It’s that time of the year when we pull out the grills, whether it is charcoal or gas, and start barbecuing.  July is a peak month for grill fires. Here are some tips on a good safe barbecuing.

Before grilling with your gas grill, check all components attached to your gas supply by using light soap and water on all connections to ensure no leaks are present. If you see bubbles coming from any area you have sprayed, immediately turn off the gas. Ensure all connections are tight. If you are still having operational problems with your grill, call a representative from the company you bought the grill from or a representative from a gas company.

Additional tips include:                                                                                                                     

1.  Read the owner’s manual.

2.  Grills are for outside use only.                                                          

3 . Use grills in a well ventilated area.

4.  Keep grill stable.

5.  Use long handle utensils.

6.  Wear safe clothing. (nothing with tails or frills)

7.  Keep fire under control. (watch for flare-ups)

8.  Be ready to extinguish flames with baking soda, sand, or a fire extinguisher. Always ensure good extinguishment of the charcoal by saturating with water until there are no hot embers.

9.  Consider placing a grill pad or splatter mat beneath the grill.

10. Never leave the grill unattended.

11.  Keep children and others away from the grill while preheating, cooking, or during cool down to ensure no one gets burned. 

12.  If using electrically-powered accessories, like a rotisserie, be sure they are properly grounded in accordance with local code. 

13.  Prior to lighting a gas grill, be sure to open the lid to prevent a buildup of gas. 

14.  Be sure the grill is placed away from your house or any other combustibles.

If at any time you feel unsafe or your grill has gotten out of control while grilling, call 911 for your local fire department to respond.

More safety facts can be found at: Hearth, Patio and Barbecue Association - General Grilling Safety and NFPA – Grilling Safety

Have an enjoyable and safe grilling season!
#### Com. v. Sistrunk

03/30/2016

33 MAL(2016)

Denied

No. 116 MDA (2015)
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2505

To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

to exempt from preemption under such title certain provisions of the

law of the State of Washington relating to health plans.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 5 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to exempt from preemption under such

title certain provisions of the law of the State of Washington relating to health plans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington State

5 Health Services Reform Enabling Act of 1994’’.
2

•S 2505 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM ERISA PREEMPTION OF CERTAIN

2 PROVISIONS OF THE LAW OF THE STATE OF

3 WASHINGTON RELATING TO HEALTH PLANS.

4 Section 514(b) of the Employee Retirement Income

5 Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1144(b)) is amended by

6 adding at the end the following new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(9)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B),

8 subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to the follow9 ing provisions of the law of the State of Washington—

10 ‘‘(i) section 212 of Chapter 492, Laws of 1993

11 (relating to enrollment of certain employees in the

12 Washington basic health plan);

13 ‘‘(ii) sections 301 and 304 of Chapter 492,

14 Laws of 1993 (relating to taxation of premiums and

15 hospitals);

16 ‘‘(iii) sections 406(7) and 454 of Chapter 492,

17 Laws of 1993 (relating to medical risk adjustment

18 mechanisms);

19 ‘‘(iv) section 427 of Chapter 492, Laws of 1993

20 (relating to benefits required to be offered by reg21 istered employer health plans);

22 ‘‘(v) section 430 of Chapter 492, Laws of 1993

23 (relating to requirements applicable to registered

24 employer health plans); and

25 ‘‘(vi) section 464 of Chapter 492, Laws of

26 1993, as amended by section 3 of Chapter 494,
3

•S 2505 IS

1 Laws of 1993 (relating to requirements that employ2 ers offer and pay a portion of the costs of employee

3 health care coverage).’’.

4 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply if any provi5 sion cited in such subparagraph, as applied, reduces or

6 restricts benefits or options obtained or to be obtained

7 pursuant to—

8 ‘‘(i) collective bargaining between bona fide em9 ployee representatives and one or more employers; or

10 ‘‘(ii) voluntary, participant-paid arrangements

11 sponsored by bona fide employee representatives or

12 their members.’’.

Æ
#### Saleh Alsaedi, Appellant, v Ninth Avenue Realty, LLC, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 316]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered May 9, 2003, which, inter alia, in this action seeking a declaration that there is a valid lease entitling plaintiff to continued tenancy of the subject commercial premises, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of declaring in defendant’s favor that there is no lease pursuant to which plaintiff may continue to tenant the premises, and otherwise affirmed, with costs to defendant payable by plaintiff.

Assuming that defendant, by forwarding plaintiff a lease extension and modification agreement, offered to extend the term of plaintiffs expiring lease—which contained no renewal option—the offer was effectively withdrawn some three months after it had been made, prior to plaintiffs putative acceptance. Moreover, the agreement, even if timely executed by plaintiff, would not have been binding on defendant because defendant did not execute it and deliver it to plaintiff *(see*General Obligations Law § 5-703 [2]; *and see 219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander’s, Inc.,*46 NY2d 506, 511 [1979]; *Jaffe v Gordon,*240 AD2d 232 [1997]).

We modify only to declare in defendant’s favor *(see Lanza v Wagner,*11 NY2d 317, 334 [1962], *appeal dismissed*371 US 74*234[1962], *cert denied*371 US 901 [1962]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams and Lerner, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James
DiLorenzo , Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc. and will be retained by Cedric
Kushner Promotions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.







/s/ James DiLorenzo
--------------------------------------------------------
Name: James DiLorenzo
Title: Acting Chief Financial Officer



Date: December 22, 2003