alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, (the Report), of SunCom Wireless, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, Michael E. Kalogris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    MICHAEL E.
KALOGRISName:

Michael E. KalogrisTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

November 14, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to SunCom Wireless, Inc. and will be retained by SunCom Wireless, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of SunCom Wireless, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
Exhibit 31.2
I, William W. Phillips, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harrington West FinancialGroup, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.        Date:  May 10, 2005 /s/ WILLIAM W. PHILLIPS   William W. Phillips,   President, Chief Operating Officer andChief Financial Officer
# C_2016118EN.01003101.xml

| 4.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/31

---

Order of the General Court of 15 February 2016 — Ezz and Others v Counsel

(Case T-279/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Egypt - Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and against associated persons and entities - Freezing of funds - Inclusion of the applicants on the list of persons targeted - Legal basis - Failure to fulfil the criteria for listing - Error of law - Error of fact - Right to property - Damage to reputation - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Obligation to state reasons - Amendment of the claims and pleas in law - Lis pendens - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 118/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz (Giza, Egypt), Abla Mohammed Fawzi Ali Ahmed Salama (Cairo, Egypt), Khadiga Ahmed Ahmed Kamel Yassin (Giza) and Shahinaz Abdel Azizabdel Wahab Al Naggar (Giza) (represented by: J. Binns, Solicitor, J. Lewis, QC, B. Kennelly, J. Pobjoy, Barristers, S. Rowe and J.-F. Bellis, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Counsel of the European Union (represented by: I. Gurov and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2011 L 76, p. 63), as amended by Council Decision 2013/144/CFSP of 21 March 2013 (OJ 2013 L 82, p. 54), and, second, of Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 of 21 March 2011‘renewed by decision of the Council notified to the applicants by letter dated 22 March 2013’ concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2011 L 76, p. 4), in so far as those acts concern the applicants.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz, Abla Mohammed Fawzi Ali Ahmed Salama, Khadiga Ahmed Ahmed Kamel Yassin and Shahinaz Abdel Azizabdel Wahab Al Naggar shall bear their own costs and, in addition, pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz, Abla Mohammed Fawzi Ali Ahmed Salama, Khadiga Ahmed Ahmed Kamel Yassin and Shahinaz Abdel Azizabdel Wahab Al Naggar shall bear their own costs and, in addition, pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

 

In our capacities as President and ChiefExecutive Officer and Vice President, Corporate Development and Chief FinancialOfficer of Stressgen Biotechnologies Corporation (the “Company”) we hereby certifybased on our respective knowledge that: (a) the enclosed Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof and for the periods covered in the Quarterly Report.

 

 
| /s/  Daniel L. Korpolinski                                          |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel  L. Korpolinski                                              |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer                              |
|                                                                |
| /s/  Gregory M. McKee                                               |   |
| Gregory  M. McKee                                                   |
| Vice  President, Corporate Development and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
***Exhibit
      32.2*** ****




**Section 1350
      Certification,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant To**


**Section 906
      of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Peter S. Teshima, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my
      knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented therein.




/S/    PETERS.
                TESHIMA**Peter
                S. Teshima****Corporate Vice President
                - Finance and**
              **Chief Financial Officer**November
                8, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
DRS Technologies, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-14487, 333-69751 and 333-83700) on Form S-8 and in
the registration statement (No. 333-101315) on Form S-3 and in the registration statement (No. 333-112423) on Form S-4 of DRS Technologies, Inc. of our
report dated May 25, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of DRS Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and comprehensive earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2004, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the March 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of DRS Technologies, Inc.

| |  | /s/KPMG LLP
| |  | -----------

Short
Hills, New Jersey
June 11, 2004

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-5521.

#### Felton L. Matthews, Petitioner v. Clark County Detention Center, et al.

562 U.S. 927, 131 S. Ct. 313,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7345.

178 L. Ed. 2d 204,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2591 

To prohibit the waste incineration of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2019 

Mr. KHANNA (for himself, Mrs. DINGELL, and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the waste incineration of per- and polyfluoroalkyl 

substances, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PFAS Waste Inciner5 ation Ban Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON WASTE INCINERATION OF PFAS. 

7 Section 3004 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 6924) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(z) PFAS WASTES.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2591 IH

1 ‘‘(1) FIREFIGHTING FOAM.—Not later than 6 

2 months after the date of enactment of this sub3 section, the Administrator shall promulgate regula4 tions prohibiting the disposal by incineration of fire5 fighting foam containing PFAS, which prohibition 

6 shall take effect not later than 9 months after the 

7 date of enactment of this subsection. 

8 ‘‘(2) OTHER PFAS WASTES.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IDENTIFICATION AND PROHIBI10 TION.—Not later than 12 months after the date 

11 of enactment of this subsection, the Adminis12 trator shall promulgate regulations— 

13 ‘‘(i) identifying additional wastes con14 taining PFAS for which a prohibition on 

15 incineration may be necessary to protect 

16 human health and the environment; and 

17 ‘‘(ii) prohibiting the disposal by incin18 eration of such identified wastes beginning 

19 not later than 18 months after the date of 

20 enactment of this subsection. 

21 ‘‘(B) REVIEW AND REVISION.—The Ad22 ministrator shall review and revise the list of 

23 wastes identified under this paragraph as need24 ed, but not less frequently than every 4 years. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2591 IH

1 ‘‘(3) PENALTIES.—For purposes of section 

2 3008(d), a waste subject to a prohibition under this 

3 subsection shall be considered a hazardous waste 

4 identified or listed under this subtitle. 

5 ‘‘(4) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term 

6 ‘PFAS’ means a perfuoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl 

7 substance with at least 1 fully fluorinated carbon 

8 atom.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# DLA Troop Support Employee Retires After 46 Years of Service 

/ Published Sept. 5, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support held a civilian retirement ceremony in honor of Annemarie Ervin on August 31, 2023.  

“Annemarie Ervin is retiring after an illustrious government career of 46 years,” said DLA Troop Support Commander Army Col. Landis C. Maddox, who presided on the ceremony. “That is almost a half century of dedication and support to the warfighters around the globe.”  

Ervin began her federal career in July of 1977 as a clerk stenographer in the subsistence supply chain. She is most proud of her involvement in the introduction of several Army uniforms— especially the implication of the black berets as the official headwear item for the Army. 

 In 2020, Ervin repositioned to her current role as a supervisory customer account specialist in the medical supply chain. 

“DLA Troop Support was a great place to work,” said Ervin. “Yes, there were days I did not want to come in but—majority of the time—I was proud to work here and support the warfighter.” 

“I am really going to miss this place, but I am surely looking forward to my next journey,” Ervin said. 

During her retirement years, Ervin looks forward to spending time with her husband Jim, and their family. 

“Your time here has made an enormous difference and impact to DLA,” said Maddox. “Not only to the accomplishment of the mission but [also] to the people you have mentored, coached, trained, led and supported along the way.”
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 25, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00025

- CR

Guill ermo CAPETILLO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CRB000381 D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s

brief is due on or before December 10, 2019

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of November, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-0262V Filed: October 6, 2017

UNPUBLISHED

SHERRY BRIGGS,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. Colleen Clemons Hartley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On February 23, 2017, Sherry Briggs (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Inju ry Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered right shoulder injuries as a result of an influenz a (“flu”) vaccine she received on October 21, 2015. Amended Petition at Introduction, ¶11. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Offi ce of Special Masters.

On October 6, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) repo rt in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent st ates that “petitioner’s all eged right shoulder injury is consistent with shoulder injury related to vaccine injury (“SIRVA”), and that it was

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reaso ned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Cour t of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).caused in fact by the flu vaccine s he received on October 21, 2015.” Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that no other causes for petiti oner’s SIRVA were identified, and “records show that she suffered the sequela of her injury for more than six months
after vaccination”. Id.

In view of respondent’s positio n and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97N-0489]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``(Petition for) Administrative 
Reconsideration of Action'' has been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(the PRA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of March 26, 1998 
(63 FR 14717), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 
section 3507 of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507). An agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. 
OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB 
control number 0910-0192. The approval expires on May 31, 2001.

    Dated: June 5, 1998.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 98-15602 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
No. 10-6346.

#### Jonathan Melendez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 978, 131 S. Ct. 492,

178 L. Ed. 2d 316,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7900.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 842.
No. 10-7071.

#### Salvador S. Martinez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1053, 131 S. Ct. 621,

178 L. Ed. 2d 451,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8938.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 876.
No. 10-5572.

#### Jeffrey Demond Williams, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1006, 131 S. Ct. 506,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8591.

178 L. Ed. 2d 376,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 291.
Exhibit 32





Section 1350 Certifications




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Shearson American REIT, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:




To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  September 7, 2011







/s/ John Williams


John Williams


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





Dated:  September 7, 2011








/s/ Aaron J. Phipps


AaRON J. PHIPPS


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
2017-0737.

#### Vertex Refining OH, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2016-545 and 2016-546.
Exhibit 99.1

Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

               Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer eachcertify as follows:

           (a)     This Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Sections13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

           (b)     The information contained in this Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|  
  
  
  
/s/ LAWRENCE N. SMITH

  
  
  
  
**Lawrence N. Smith Chief Executive Officer**

  
Date:

**November 12, 2002**

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
/s/ ELEANOR J. WHITEHURST

  
  
  
  
**Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer**

  
Date:

**November 12, 2002**

   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|