alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Duncan Hayward, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Duncan Hayward
------------------
Duncan Hayward
Chief Accounting Officer
November 8, 2007

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re
Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# Foreign-travel employee requirements and tips

/ Published Aug. 17, 2016

Are you going on temporary duty travel to a foreign country?

If so, are you aware there are more requirements than just completing your travel orders in the Defense Travel System?  

The DoD Foreign Clearance Guide outlines all the requirements you must complete before traveling. The requirements vary by combatant command and country. And they change continually, based on current threats. 

The DoD FCG is broken down by CCMD and the countries in each one. For some countries, requirements for countries include: 
      - Completion of country clearance in the Aircraft and Personnel Automated Clearance System; 
      - Completion of Level I Antiterrorism within 12 months before travel; 
      - Completion of Isolated Personnel Report training within 12 months before travel; 
      - Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape training within 36 months of travel; and 
      - Receiving a travel threat briefing from an antiterrorism officer. 

Links to all the training requirements are below. 

The traveler must complete all requirements before travel and should begin to complete the requirements 45-60 days in advance. The lead time for completing the country clearance in APACS varies by country and ranges from 21 to 45 days. All DTS orders for foreign travel are routed to the local ATO, who certifies that the traveler has received a travel-threat briefing for each country. 

“With recent events around the world, the required training reminds travelers to maintain awareness of their surroundings while traveling,” said Jeff Benton, a physical security specialist at DLA Security & Emergency Services. 

Employees with a top secret/sensitive compartmented information clearance have additional requirements for travel (whether official or personal) and should consult their special security officer with questions.

For those traveling to a foreign country for pleasure, there are also resources available. It is not required, but you are highly encouraged to receive a travel-threat briefing from your local ATO. 

Also consider visiting the State Department’s website for travel alerts and warnings for countries with an elevated threat. The site also has information on the embassies and consulates; entry, exit and visa requirements; local laws and special circumstances; and health and medical facilities for every country. 

The State Department also encourages citizens to enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program before traveling. This allows you to receive important information from the embassy and to be contacted in the event of a natural disaster, civil unrest or family emergency. Enrollment can also can help family or friends get in touch with you in an emergency.

“With the Smart Traveler, it can be a reassuring thought knowing the U.S. Embassy is aware you are in the country which ensures that your location is accounted for during any type of emergency,” Benton noted.

Helpful Links:

DoD Foreign Clearance Guide

Aircraft and Personnel Automated Clearance System (APACS)

State Department Travel Website

Smart Traveler Enrollment Program

ISOPREP Training

SERE Training
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 32705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16136]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 1998 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 32705]]


                Presidential Determination No. 98-26 of June 3, 1998

                
Determination Under Section 402(d)(1) of the 
                Trade Act of 1974, as Amended--Continuation of Waiver 
                Authority

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me under the Trade 
                Act of 1974, as amended, Public Law 93-618, 88 Stat. 
                1978 (hereinafter ``the Act''), I determine, pursuant 
                to section 402(d)(1) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2432(d)(1), 
                that the further extension of the waiver authority 
                granted by section 402 of the Act will substantially 
                promote the objectives of section 402 of the Act. I 
                further determine that continuation of the waiver 
                applicable to the People's Republic of China will 
                substantially promote the objectives of section 402 of 
                the Act.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                determination in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 3, 1998.

[FR Doc. 98-16136
Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-M
No. 10-6235.

#### Jeremy Pinson, Petitioner v. J. Grimes, et al.

562 U.S. 1013, 131 S. Ct. 527,

178 L. Ed. 2d 388,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8645.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 391 Fed. Appx. 797.
# C_2015089EN.01001902.xml

| 16.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2015 — KSR v OHIM — Lampenwelt (Moon)

(Case T-374/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Proceedings seeking a declaration of invalidity - Community word mark Moon - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptive nature - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 089/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: KSR Kunststoff Rotation GmbH (Wehr, Germany) (represented by: H. Börjes-Pestalozza and M. Nielen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: A. Pohlmann, subsequently by: D. Walicka, and finally by: A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Lampenwelt GmbH & Co. KG (Schlitz, Germany) (represented by: G. Rother, P. Mes, C. Graf von der Groeben, J. Künzel, J. Bühling, D. Jestaedt, M. Bergermann, A. Kramer, J. Vogtmeier and A. Verhauwen, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 May 2013 (Case R 676/2012-4) concerning invalidity proceedings between Lampenwelt GmbH & Co. KG and KSR Kunststoff Rotation GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders KSR Kunststoff Rotation GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders KSR Kunststoff Rotation GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


  CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350),
the undersigned, Edward James, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended June 30, 2003 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



                                           /s/ Edward James
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Edward James
                                           Interim Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           November 14, 2003
# Subsistence team sees Air Force food initiative at Dover AFB 

/ Published May 13, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 
Subsistence employees visited Dover Air Force Base, Delaware April 27 to learn more about the Air Force's Food Transformation Initiative.

The FTI pilot program was launched in 2010 in an effort to provide airmen with more variety and healthier food options, while ensuring that airmen receive training in food service and are ready to deploy.

The FTI was implemented at Dover Air Force Base in the fall of 2015 with the conversion of their dining facility to a college campus-style setup. The initiative allows airmen to use their or meal cards  at other venues on base.

The group explored the FTI at a base dining facility, two Morale, Welfare and Recreation facilities, and a food kiosk on the flight line. The team also took a tour of the kitchen and observed staff preparing food and updating inventory.

“I liked seeing the main dining facility because we got to go back into the kitchen,” said Amanda Holzerman, Subsistence tailored vendor logistics specialist. “It was cool seeing all the products that we manage in the catalog every day on the shelf, like ‘oh yeah we just approved that last week.’”

Subsistence account manager and retired airman William Diaz was impressed by the food kiosk operation.

Diaz said it was helpful to meet the staff at the various facilities.

“When you get to meet the staff and meet the people in charge, you can apply ideas that would help them if they are having issues on our side, versus not being able to see them face-to-face,” said Diaz.

The Subsistence team sampled some of the available FTI items for lunch at the renovated Patterson Dining Facility. The facility now includes a salad bar, smoothie station, a Mongolian style grill, and grab-and-go items. They still offer alternatives like pizza, hamburgers and hotdogs.

The FTI is still in the early stages but is gradually being adopted by other Air Force bases. It may also be adopted by other services in the future, said Diaz
#### People v James (Ovarado)

County Ct, 5/5/16 (Monroe)

denied 8/17/16 (Pigott, J.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1

<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                 494
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       494
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         4,853,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  473,083
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            14
<COMMON>                                               19,207
<OTHER-SE>                                             4,380,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           4,853,994
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       318,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     8,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (327,086)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (327,086)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (327,086)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.02)



</TABLE>
#### Com. v. Thompson 45

03/08/2016

592 MAL (2015)

45

. Justice EAKIN and DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 106 A.3d 742
#### GAI Consultants, Inc. v. Homestead Borough; Borough of Homestead, In re

12/11/2015

313 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 120 A.3d 417
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jaime Lopez-Mendoza, Appellant.

[65 NYS3d 519]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered February 15, 2011, as amended February 22, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Assuming without deciding that the introduction of DNA reports and related expert testimony violated defendant’s right of confrontation, the admission of the testimony and reports was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt *(see People v Douglas,*4 NY3d 777, 779 [2005]; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 240-241 [1975]). The DNA evidence established only that defendant had subjected the complainant to sexual contact—a fact defendant admitted when he told the arresting officer that he had sex with the complainant.

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims are unreviewable on direct appeal because they involve matters not reflected in, or fully explained by, the record *(see People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 998, 999-1000 [1982]). Defendant asserts that his trial counsel failed to adequately review video surveillance evidence that the People turned over before trial. As a result of this failure, defendant argues, trial counsel promised the jury in his opening statement that defendant would testify, but when it became apparent that the video surveillance would have refuted defendant’s testimony, counsel reversed course and did not put his client on the stand.

Despite defendant’s contentions to the contrary, we cannot conclude simply by reviewing the trial record that trial counsel was ineffective *(Love,*57 NY2d at 1000). The brief exchange in which the video surveillance was discussed by trial counsel, the People, and the trial court is insufficient to establish that *527trial counsel promised defendant’s testimony in his opening statement because he did not adequately review the video surveillance before trial. In addition, while defendant notes that he was offered a sentence of five years incarceration by the trial court before starting pretrial hearings, the record before us is insufficient to determine whether trial counsel’s alleged error caused defendant to reject that offer.

The trial court properly admitted carpet fiber evidence, because the circumstances provide “reasonable assurances” that the carpet sample that was used to compare to the fibers found on defendant’s pants were from the same carpet that was in the room at the time of the incident *(see People v Julian,*41 NY2d 340, 343 [1977]). Defendant’s argument to the contrary is speculative, and at best goes to weight rather than admissibility.

Defendant’s challenge to the prosecutor’s summation is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the remarks at issue did not constitute comment on defendant’s failure to testify.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz and Gesmer, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO****SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, David C. Milholm, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Double Eagle Petroleum Co.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
 

 
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date:  March 14, 2006 /s/ David C. Milholm   David C. Milholm, Chief Financial Officer
# Police Week to honor, recognize installation officers

/ Published May 13, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 

Police officers at Defense Supply Center Columbus are hosting a variety of events throughout the week of May 15-21 to recognize the significance of Police Week, including a wreath laying ceremony, a 5k run, an information booth, and a cookout honoring the sacrifices made by the men and women who protect the installation. DSCC Police Division Watch Commander Edward Compton Jr. says the week’s events are a way to acknowledge the contributions of the peace officers who commit their lives to the service of public safety. “Police Week honors fallen police officers, and it also gives recognition to the difficult and dangerous jobs being done by the police,” he said. “This is often a thankless job, meaning we don’t go out seeking thanks. We do it because we’re part of the community.”On the morning of May 16, installation officials will lay a wreath at the future site of a memorial for fallen DSCC police officers. The presentation of the wreath will serve as a solemn tribute to officers who have died in the line of duty. The ceremony will take place at 10 a.m. at Building 58.While many associates are familiar with the daily routine of passing through the security checkpoints to enter the installation, they may not realize the hazards faced each day by the police officers who manage those entry points. Gate personnel protect the installation from outside physical threats as well as illegal and forbidden weapons and materials seized during vehicle inspections.  Police representatives will be on hand May 18 in the Building 20 cafeteria during lunch hours displaying an assortment of contraband that has been confiscated from vehicles during visitor inspections. These items include drug paraphernalia and dangerous weapons.That same day the DSCC police mobile command vehicle will be on display behind Building 20 and open for visitors to tour and learn about. The vehicle, nicknamed “Big Blue”, serves as a self-contained tactical command center which can be used during emergency situations on the installation. The next day the DSCC Morale Welfare and Recreation office will host a Memorial 5k run/walk event to honor police officers and military members who have died while serving. “Police Week allows us to show appreciation for hard work our officers put in every day,” Compton said. “The main focus is the Memorial Day, but we spread it out over the entire week to ensure every officer on every shift can have a chance to receive the recognition they deserve.”Compton added that the best way for all DSCC employees to participate in Police Week is through a simple gesture – just saying thanks when they see a police officer.