alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE03551

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Biavaschi, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 439]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), entered on or about July 6, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure *(see People v Gillotti,*23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying crime, which involved the forcible, predatory rape of a young child. Defendant failed to sufficiently elaborate on his medical conditions or present any detailed evidence to suggest that a level two adjudication overassesses his dangerousness and risk of *470sexual recidivism. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Richter, Gesmer, Kern and Moulton, JJ.
Exhibit 31

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth J. Eaken, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 21, 2005    /S/Kenneth J. Eaken
                         Principal Executive Officer
                         Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          39,782
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,872
<INVENTORY>                                     40,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,911
<PP&E>                                          61,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 249,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,517
<BONDS>                                          5,226
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,721
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   249,010
<SALES>                                        362,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,412
<CGS>                                          137,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               191,669
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   646
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,434
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,585
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,849
<DISCONTINUED>                                  12,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,849
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.66
        

</TABLE>
New Chemical Substance: TS- 11KK6F

Redacted
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.

Robert W. Kneisley

Associate General Counsel

1901 L Street, N.W., Suite 640

Washington, D.C. 20036

(202) 263

- 6284

(202) 263

- 6291

- Fax

Bob.kneisley@wnco.com

______________________________________________________________________________

July 24 , 2012

VIA E

- MAIL & FIRST CLASS MAIL

Rebecca B. MacPherson, Esq.

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

rebecca

. macpherson @ faa .gov

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption No. 8112E

Dear Ms. MacPherson :

On Ju ly 9, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) granted the request

of AirTran Airways, a wholly owned subsidiary of Southwest Airlines, for renewal of

E xemption N o. 8112 from 14 CFR § 93.123 . This exemption allocate s three slot

exemptions to Air Tran to conduct scheduled operations at Ronal d Reagan Washington

National Airport (“DCA”). FAA renewed the authority as Exemption 8112E, for use by

AirTran and/or Southwest for a five

- year term

.

The FAA’s renewal authorized operations under the exemption in the 0700,

0800, and 0900 hours, but specified that “the FAA may adjust the time period for each

operation if necessary for air traffic control or other operational purposes.” Southwest

hereby requests that the FAA amend E xemption 8112E to allow AirTran to continue

operating the slot exemptions at their current times: 0800 (slot ID 1648), 1100 (slot ID

1194) and 1600 (slot ID 1531). AirTran has been operating these slot exemptions with

daily frequencies at these times for the past several years , with the knowledge and

approval of the FAA

. Accordingly, Southwest requests confirmation of the ability to

continue to conduct operations at those times through the term of Exemption 8112E

.

We appreciate your assistance with this matter.

Sincerely,

___________________ Robert W. Kneisley

c c: Brian Meehan

Rob Hawks, Attorney
2017-1519.

#### State v. Carter.

Mahoning App. No. 15 MA 0225, 2017-0hio-8220. Appellant’s motion to file an amended memorandum in support of jurisdiction denied as moot.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
#### Jerry E. Clements et al., Appellants, v 201 Water Street LLC, Respondent.

[70 NYS3d 4]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Erika M. Edwards, J.), entered August 28, 2017, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and for attorneys’ fees and costs on the motion, and declared that the parties’ purchase agreement is not void, illusory, or unenforceable and that plaintiffs are not entitled to the return of their down payment, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny defendant’s motion to dismiss, and to vacate the declaration that plaintiffs are not entitled to the return of their down payment, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to plaintiffs’ conclusory allegations, the purchase agreement does not place sole and absolute discretion in defendant sponsor to set a closing date on plaintiffs’ condominium unit. Rather, the agreement requires defendant to set a closing date either concurrently with or after the attainment of appropriate certificates of occupancy for the building or plaintiffs’ unit, which was under construction when the parties entered into the agreement. Defendant is also obligated under the agreement to use best efforts to procure the certificates within two years of the issuance of the building’s or any unit’s first temporary certificate of occupancy. At the time plaintiffs commenced the instant action, the requisite certificates of occupancy were not yet obtained, and the complaint makes no allegation of unreasonable delays on defendant’s part in the progress of the condominium’s construction. While the agreement does not specify a closing date, the law provides for a reasonable time to close *(see Grace v Nappa,*46 NY2d 560, 565 [1979]; *Kaiser-Haidri v Battery Place Green, LLC,*85 AD3d 730, 733 [2d Dept 2011]). Accordingly, the agreement is not illusory or unenforceable *(see Kaiser-Haidri,*85 AD3d 730).

The motion court correctly ruled that defendant is entitled to recover attorneys’ fees and costs for the instant motion pursuant to the express terms of the agreement *(see Board of Mgrs. of 55 Walker St. Condominium v Walker St.,*6 AD3d 279 [1st Dept 2004]).

We modify to declare in defendant’s favor, rather than dismiss the complaint *(Hunter v Seneca Ins. Co., Inc.,*114 AD3d 556, 557 [1st Dept 2014]). We also modify to strike the declaration that plaintiffs are not entitled to a return of their down payment as premature, since they may still close on their unit.

Concur—Sweeny, J.R, Richter, Andrias, Webber, Oing, JJ.
No. 10-5109.

#### Sukit N. Kumvachirapitag, Petitioner v. Microsoft Corporation, et al.

562 U.S. 1104, 131 S. Ct. 816,

178 L. Ed. 2d 550,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9524.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

The Chief Justice and Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 953, 131 S. Ct. 242, 178 L. Ed. 2d 251, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7776.
# C_2014093EN.01002302.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/23

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 January 2014 — Romonta v Commission

(Case T-614/13 R)

(Interim measures - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - System of exchange of greenhouse gas emission allowances - Free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances from 2013 - Application for recognition of hardship - Lack of urgency)

2014/C 93/40

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Romonta GmbH (Amsdorf, Seebebiet Mansfelder Land, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke, M. Vollmer, C. Telschow and A. Schultze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. White, C. Hermes and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2013/448/EU of 5 September 2013 concerning national implementation measures for the transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances in accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2013 L 240, p. 27), in so far as the allocation of emission allowances to the applicant for hardship is refused.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2014329EN.01002602.xml

| 22.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/26

---

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2014 — Zehnder v OHIM — UAB ‘Amalva’ (komfovent)

(Case T-577/13) (1)

1

2014/C 329/42

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
No. 10-7245.

#### Michael E. Nance, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1076, 131 S. Ct. 680,

178 L. Ed. 2d 505,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9160.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 611 F.3d 409.
Exhibit 21.1**Subsidiaries of Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc.**     **Entity** **Jurisdiction****AquaSource, Inc.***(Inactive)* Delaware**Cherrington Insurance, Ltd.** Bermuda**DQE Capital Corporation** Delaware**DQE Enterprises, Inc.** PennsylvaniaAllegheny Development Corporation *(Inactive)* PennsylvaniaBodyMedia, Inc. DelawareIn-Transition, Inc. *(Inactive)* PennsylvaniaJLK Technology, Inc. *(Inactive)* DelawareLab Cor, Inc. OregonNWP Services Corp. DelawareProperty Ventures, Ltd. *(Inactive)* Pennsylvania     **DQE Financial Corp.** DelawareDuquesne Power, LLC DelawareMariner Investment Strategies, LLC. DelawareDiemen No. 33 LLC DelawareDiemen-Flevo Co. DelawareAlkmaar, LLC DelawareSchiphol LLC DelawareHolyhead LLC DelawareMaasvlakte LLC DelawareMonticello Two Corporation DelawareMonticello Leasing Limited Partnership* DelawareUtrecht LLC DelawareMontauk Energy Capital, LLC DelawareApollo Energy III, LLC WashingtonChautauqua LFG, L.L.C. DelawareCOP LFG, L.L.C. DelawareCRMC Bethlehem LLC DelawareDade County LGP, L.L.C. DelawareEnviroGas Holdings, Inc. DelawareCBM Capital, L.L.C. *(Inactive)* DelawareLFG Capital, L.L.C. *(Inactive)* DelawareGlacier Ridge LFG, LLC DelawareGSF Energy, L.L.C. DelawareLandfill Gas Production, L.L.C. DelawareLFG Management Services, L.L.C. DelawareMASS Energy, LLC DelawareMontauk Synfuels, LLC DelawareRolling Hills LFG, L.L.C. DelawareRoosevelt Landfill Gas Recovery, L.L.C. DelawareSan Antonio LGP, L.L.C. DelawareVB LFG, L.L.C. DelawareWaste Energy Technology, LLC NevadaHereford Contracting & Excavating, Inc. WashingtonZion LFG, LLC DelawareNorth Shore Affordable Housing, LLC DelawareMonticello Leasing Limited Partnership* Delaware     **DQE Systems, Inc.***(Inactive)* PennsylvaniaDQE Communications, LLC. PennsylvaniaDQE Communications Network Services LLC PennsylvaniaDuquesne Broadband LLC DelawareDuquesne Broadband Smart Grid LLC Delaware
 

 
     **Entity** **Jurisdiction****Duquesne Energy Solutions, LLC** DelawareDES Corporate Services, Inc. DelawareDES Operating Services, Inc. DelawareDH Energy, L.P. * PennsylvaniaDQE Synfuels, L.P. * PennsylvaniaDES Synfuel Operating Services, Inc. DelawareDH Energy, LLC PennsylvaniaDH Energy, L.P. * PennsylvaniaDQE Synfuels LLC DelawareDH Canada, Inc. New BrunswickDQE Synfuels, L.P. * PennsylvaniaM T Detroit, Inc. *(Inactive)* DelawareMonmouth Energy, Inc. New JerseyDTE Pittsburgh, LLC DelawareM T Energy, Inc. Pennsylvania     **Duquesne Light Company** PennsylvaniaDuquesne Financial, L. P*. (Inactive)* PennsylvaniaDuquesne Power Two, LLC *(Inactive)* DelawareMonongahela Light and Power Company PennsylvaniaDataCom Information Systems, LLC DelawareMaglev, Inc. PennsylvaniaOakridge Resources, Inc. *(Inactive)* Pennsylvania     **Duquesne Light Energy, LLC** Delaware     **Duquesne Generation Company** Pennsylvania**Subsidiaries of Duquesne Light Company**     **Entity** **Jurisdiction**Duquesne Financial, L. P*. (Inactive)* PennsylvaniaDuquesne Power Two, LLC *(Inactive)* DelawareMonongahela Light and Power Company PennsylvaniaDataCom Information Systems, LLC DelawareMaglev, Inc. PennsylvaniaOakridge Resources, Inc. *(Inactive)* Pennsylvania * Multiple Parents
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2761 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2761

   To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to 
    immediately release certain grant funds awarded for mitigation 
activities under the Community Development Block Grant program, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2019

 Mrs. Fletcher (for herself, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Babin, Mr. Brady, 
  Mr. Carter of Texas, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Flores, Ms. Garcia of Texas, 
Miss Gonzalez-Colon of Puerto Rico, Mr. Graves of Louisiana, Mr. Green 
of Texas, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. McCaul, Mr. Rice of South Carolina, Mr. 
   Yoho, Mr. Olson, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Cunningham, and Mr. Butterfield) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to 
    immediately release certain grant funds awarded for mitigation 
activities under the Community Development Block Grant program, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bipartisan Disaster Recovery Funding 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Funding for mitigation activities was appropriated to 
        the Department of Housing and Urban Development by Congress in 
        February 2018 under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (Public 
        Law 115-123; 132 Stat. 64).
            (2) The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development told 
        Congress that the funding described in paragraph (1) would be 
        released by May 1, 2019.
            (3) May 1, 2019, has come and gone with no official 
        explanation as to the reason for the continued delay in 
        releasing the funds.

SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT.

    For all amounts made available for mitigation activities under the 
heading ``Department of Housing and Urban Development--Community 
Planning and Development--Community Development Fund'' in Public Law 
115-123, and awarded as grants by the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
Development, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall, 
not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, release 
such amounts awarded to all eligible grantees, regardless of any 
further studies as may be otherwise required by law.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2013367EN.01002503.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Strasbourg (France) lodged on 8 October 2013 — Geoffrey Léger v Ministre des affaires sociales et de la santé, Établissement français du sang

(Case C-528/13)

2013/C 367/46

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal administratif de Strasbourg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Geoffrey Léger

Applicant:

Defendants: Ministre des affaires sociales et de la santé, Établissement français du sang

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

In the light of Annex III to Directive 2004/33/EC, (1) does the fact that a man has sexual relations with another man constitute in itself sexual behaviour placing him at a high risk of acquiring severe infectious diseases that can be transmitted by blood and justifying a permanent deferral from blood donation for persons having engaged in that sexual behaviour, or is it merely capable of constituting, in the light of the circumstances of the individual case, sexual behaviour placing him at a risk of acquiring infectious diseases that can be transmitted by blood and justifying a temporary deferral from blood donation for a period determined after the cessation of the risk behaviour?

1

---

(1)  Commission Directive 2004/33/EC of 22 March 2004 implementing Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for blood and blood components (OJ 2004 L 91, p. 25).

1

---