alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6167** 

FELIPE TRUJILLO , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. JOHN PATE, Warden, Allendale Correctional Institution , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 2:14

- cv
- 00361

- TMC )

Submitted : April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON , Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Felipe Trujillo, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Melody Jan e Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appe llee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Felipe Trujillo seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. * The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012) . The magistrate judge

recommended th at relief be denied and advised Trujillo that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could
waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v.

Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Trujillo has waived
appellate review by failing to timely file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny Trujillo’s motion

for a ce rtificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

* To the extent that Trujillo also seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, we lack jurisdiction to consider that order because he did not file a notice of appeal until after the appeal period expired. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) , (a)(4)(B)(ii); Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32

            CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF
                                FINANCIAL OFFICER


                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Distribution Management
Services, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended November 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Leo Greenfield, Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge

(1) The Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


January 20, 2004                            /s/ Leo Greenfield
                                            ------------------------------
                                                  Leo Greenfield,
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Acting Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17322]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ASSASSINATION RECORDS REVIEW BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE: July 7-8, 1998.

PLACE: ARRB, 600 E Street, NW, Washington, DC.

STATUS: Closed: July 7, 1998, 9:00 a.m.; Open: July 8, 1998, 10:00 
a.m.-12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m.-4:00 p.m.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Closed Meeting:
    1. Review and Accept Minutes of Closed Meeting
    2. Review of Assassination Records
    3. Other Business
Open Meeting:
    1. Discussion of Final Report
    2. Review and Accept Minutes of June 4, 1998 Open Meeting
    3. Other Business

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen Sullivan, Press Officer, 
600 E Street, NW, Second Floor, Washington, DC 20530. Telephone: (202) 
724-0088; Fax: (202) 724-0457.
T. Jeremy Gunn,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-17322 Filed 6-25-98; 11:12 am]
BILLING CODE 6118-01-P
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**          We have issued our reports dated September 11, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedule, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting included in the Annual Report of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. and subsidiaries onForm 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference ofsaid reports in the Registration Statements of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. and subsidiaries on FormsS-8 (File No. 33-19288, effective December 23, 1987; File No. 33-26065, effective February 18,1988; File No. 33-32984, effective January 12, 1990; File No. 33-38914, effective February 8, 1991;File No. 33-38914, effective September 26, 1994, File No. 333-18515, effective December 20, 1996and File No. 333-128312, effective September 14, 2005) and Forms S-3 (File No. 333-18479, effectiveDecember 20, 1996, File No. 333-60987, effective August 21, 1998, File No. 333-32144, effectiveMarch 10, 2000, File No. 333-58506, effective April 23, 2001, File No. 333-65580, effective August3, 2001 and File No. 333-73796, effective November 20, 2001)./s/ Grant Thornton LLPMinneapolis, Minnesota
Exhibit 10.1


 


THE
NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC.


2002
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


STOCK
GRANT AWARD CERTIFICATE AND RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT


This Certificate, when executed by a duly authorized
officer of The Navigators Group, Inc. (the “Company”), evidences the grant to
the Participant named herein of a stock grant Award for shares of the Common
Stock of the Company in accordance with the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”).




	
  1.

  	
   

  	
  Participant: Stanley A.
  Galanski

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  2.

  	
   

  	
  Number of shares of
  Common Stock subject to the Award: 13,793

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  3.

  	
   

  	
  Effective date of the
  Award: December 9, 2004

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  4.

  	
   

  	
  Award Vesting Period:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  With respect to the
  shares subject to the Award, 50% of such shares vest on December 9, 2004 and
  the remaining 50% vest on January 1, 2006.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  5.

  	
   

  	
  Employee shall make
  such arrangements with the Company with respect to income tax withholding 

  
	
  as the Company shall
  determine in its sole discretion is appropriate to ensure payment of federal,
  state or local income taxes.

  
	
   

  
	
  6.

  	
   

  	
  Each participant receiving
  Common Stock resulting from an Award agrees that such Award and related 

  
	
  Common Stock shall be
  subject to, and governed by, all of the terms of the Plan, and represents and
  warrants to the Company that such Common Stock is for investment for his or her
  own account and will not sell or otherwise dispose of said Common Stock
  except in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. By
  acceptance of this Certificate, the Participant agrees to abide by all terms
  and conditions of the Plan. Terms defined in the Plan are used in this
  Certificate as so defined.

  
				






This Certificate is not a security and does not
represent the stock grant Award described herein but, rather, describes the
Common Stock granted to the Participant as reflected on the books and records
of the Company.  Neither this Certificate
nor the stock grant Award represented hereby are assignable or transferable by
the Participant except as otherwise permitted under the Plan.


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  The Navigators
  Group, Inc.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By: 

  	
  /s/ Terence N. Deeks

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Terence N. Deeks

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman
EXHIBIT
        32.2*
 
 
 
 
 
 Section
        1350 Certification
 
 I,
        Steven
        G. Larson, the chief financial officer of LaserCard Corporation, a Delaware
        corporation (the “Company”), certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63
        of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge:
 
 (i)  the
        Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31,
        2006 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        and
 
 (ii)  the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  June
        13,
        2006
 
 
 /s/Steven
        G. Larson
 Steven
        G.
        Larson
 
 _______________________
 
 *The
        material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and
        is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
        the
        Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
        before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
        language contained in such filing.
 
    98
No. 10-5866.

#### Danny McGleachie, Petitioner v. Mississippi; and Danny McGleachie, Petitioner v. E.L. *301Sparkman, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary.

562 U.S. 969, 131 S. Ct. 472,

178 L. Ed. 2d 300,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8069.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 10-6102.

#### Mike Settle, Petitioner v. Ricky Bell, Warden.

562 U.S. 970, 131 S. Ct. 480,

178 L. Ed. 2d 304,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8073,

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
p130071.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0071 Focus Ready Draft 11/19/2012

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

Page 1p130071.eng

SAT (concerns) (11/09/2012): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox Related Cases:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P1B1T1 . Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb.), No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

Page 2p130071.eng

Page 3p130071.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0071

Page 4p130071.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0071

Page 5p130071.eng

Page 6p130071.eng Concerning what TSCA CBI?

PMN: 13-0071

Page 7
No. 10-7249.

#### Karen Allen, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1076, 131 S. Ct. 680,

178 L. Ed. 2d 505,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9116.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 603 F.3d 1202.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30766-30767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 19(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 
Special Emphasis Panel meeting:

    Name of SEP: ZDKI GRB-B C2.
    Date: June 3, 1998.
    Time:  12:00 Noon.
    Place: Room 6AS-25S, Natcher Building, NIH (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact: Ned Feder, M.D., Scientific Review Administrator, 
Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 6AS-25S, National 
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-6600, Phone: (301) 
594-8890.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 30767]]

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
above meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.847-849, 
Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases; Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition; and Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, 
National Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: May 28, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
NIH Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-14934 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
## NUMBER 13

- 1 9

- 00 487

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



# ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Perkes

Per Curiam Order

Relator USAA General Indemnity Company f iled a petition for writ of mandamus in

the above cause seeking to compel the trial court to quash a deposition, or alternatively,

limit the scope of the deposition

. T he Court requests that the real party in interest

, Frank

Wearden

, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file

a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days

from the date of this order. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e

1st day of November , 2019

.
# DLA civilian killed in Afghanistan left legacy of service, friendship

/ Published July 13, 2015
Fort Belvoir, Virginia,
#### People v Blond

App Div, 3d Dept: 2016 NY Slip Op 68278(U) (Schenectady)

denied 8/24/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
# C_2014253EN.01002702.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 June 2014 — 1872 Holdings v OHIM — Havana Club International (THE SPIRIT OF CUBA)

(Case T-207/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark THE SPIRIT OF CUBA - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 253/39

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: 1872 Holdings vof (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Antoine-Lalance, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Havana Club International SA (Havana, Cuba) (represented by: M. Pomares Caballero, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 January 2013 (Case R 684/2012-1) concerning invalidity proceedings between Havana Club International SA and 1872 Holdings vof.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders 1872 Holdings vof to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders 1872 Holdings vof to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
No. 10-243.

#### Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, Petitioner v. Douglas E. Rosenthal.

562 U.S. 963, 131 S. Ct. 475,

178 L. Ed. 2d 290,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8020.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 985 A.2d 443.
No. D-2517.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Edward Pepyne, Jr.

562 U.S. 811, 131 S. Ct. 401,

178 L. Ed. 2d 266,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7612.

October 4, 2010.

Edward Pepyne, Jr., of Greenfield, Massachusetts, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 09-11530.

#### Andre Calwise, Petitioner v. Cindi Curtin, Warden.

562 U.S. 886, 131 S. Ct. 216,

178 L. Ed. 2d 130,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7073.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 367 Fed. Appx. 644.
No. 09-11360.

#### Alfonso Rodriguez, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 981, 131 S. Ct. 413,

178 L. Ed. 2d 322,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8158.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 581 F.3d 775.
The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 Ne"v Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590~0001 

Dear Secretary Foxx, 

December 2, 2013 

i'·,,) 

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the Department of Transportation's 

continued support ofEssential Air Service (EAS) at Kalaupapa, Hawaii. 

Situated on a peninsula and due to its geographic isolation, Kalaupapa was the location \vhere 

individuals afflicted 'i\1ith Hansen's disease (then referred to as leprosy) were sent for 

quarantine. This practice began during the Kingdom ofHa\vaii, continued through Hawaii's 

annexation as a territory of the United States, and into our early years of statehood. From 1866 

through 1969, it is estimated that more than 8,000 people were exiled to Kalaupapa. 

While the patient population at Kalaupapa is now 16, the need to provide quality, reliable and 

affordable air service remains. Besides air transportation, the only viable and regular access route 

is via a 3.5 mile extremely steep, cliff trail that the National Park Service notes shou1d only be 

attempted by .. 'very physically fit persons," or by a guided, mule-back tour. Commtmities like 

Kalaupapa demonstrate the very purpose behind the EAS program. 

I am proud to have worked with, and on behalf of, the residents of Kalaupapa during my time in 

the Hawaii State Legislature, as Lieutenant Governor ofthe State ofHav .... ·aii, and as a Member of 

Congress. I strongly support the Department's decision to continue EAS tor Kalaupapa for it is 

in the public interest. As you consider the current proposals, I recommend the Department give 

serious \\·'eight and consideration to input offered by the Kalaupapa community. No other group 

is more affected by the Department's selection, and no other group can attest to the importance 

of air transportation services that are punctual, reliable, and provided \vith the dignity and respect 

they are due. 

Thank you again for your consideration. 

Aloha, 

Mazie K. Hirono 

United States Senator
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS,  STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  AND DEFICIT,  STATEMENTS  OF  SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY,  STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND THE NOTES THERETO,  WHICH MAY BE FOUND ON
PAGES 2 THROUGH 8 OF THE  COMPANY'S  FORM  10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED JUNE 30,
1999,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         8,563
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,563
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,390
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     21
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,461
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,996)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
No. 10-6644.

#### Haiyan Lin, Petitioner v. Toinette Reed.

562 U.S. 1069, 131 S. Ct. 654,

178 L. Ed. 2d 491,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9310.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of South Carolina denied.