## Ap pendix 2 Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Materials Recycling OperationsAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling

i 

## Appendix 2 Contents Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Operations

Site Name State

American Brass Alabama Interstate Lead Co. (ILCO) Alabama Red River Aluminum Arkansas Alco Pacific California Baron Blakeslee California Berman Steel

- Salinas California Chemical and Pigment Company California Commodity Refining Exchange California Cooper Drum Co. California Davis Chemical Company California Enviropur West Corporation California Federated Metals California Gibson Environmental California GNB Incorporated (Exide Technologies) California John Alexander Research California K&D Salvage California Liquid Chemical Corp. Californi a Lorentz Barrel & Drum Co. California Mobile Smelting California Myers Drum California Omega Chemical Corporation California Quicksilver Products, Inc. California Rho Chem Corp CaliforniaAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling

ii Safety

- Kleen, Inc., El Monte California Safety

- Kleen Corpor ation, Reedley Recycling Center California Safety

- Kleen Corporation, Rohnert Park California Safety

- Kleen (San Jose Facility) California Sierra Battery Sales California United Metal Recovery California Victor Industrial Battery California CoZinCo Co l orado National Oil Services Connecticut Zollo Drum Company Connecticut Chem

- Solv, Inc. Delaware Diamond State Salvage Delaware Standard Chlorine of Delaware Delaware 43rd Street Bay Drum and Steel Company Florida Aerospace Recycling (Gerald B. Stringham, Jr.) Florida Callaway & Son Drum Service Florida Crosby Motors Florida Danmark Inc. Florida Don's Recycling aka All Salvaged Auto Parts Florida Energy Savings LTD, Inc. Florida Florida Petroleum Reprocessors Florida Helms Drum Service Florida Holloway Oil Company Florida International Processing Specialists (IPS) Florida Joel C. Patterson and AC Florida Kempton Brothers, Inc. Florida Miami Battery FloridaAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling

iii Progressive Marketing Group, Inc. Florida Romarc Industries (Ron Roberts) Florida Rouse Steel Drum Florida Rowe Paint and Plas

- Chem Coatings (Wilmer Rowe) Florida Schuylkill Metals Corp. Florida Singleton Battery Florida Singleton Battery/TPA Florida Tri

- City Oil Conservationist, Inc. Florida UNC Florida United Metals, Inc. Florida Yellow Water Road Dump Florida Alternate Energy Resources, Inc. Georgia Exide Technologies (formerly GNB Technologies, Inc) Georgia Joe Sikes Oil Service, Inc. Georgia SoGreen, Parramore Fertilizer, Barren Area Georgia P4 Production LLC

- Mon santo Idaho Circle Smelting Corporation Illinois Clayton Chemical Company Illinois Environmental Waste Resources, Inc. Illinois Hydromet Environmental USA Incorporated Illinois J Pitt Melt Shop Illinois Moreco Energy, Inc. Illinois R. Lavin & Sons, Inc. Illinois Amacor Residential/Amacor Magnesium Fire Indiana Continental Steel Corp. Indiana Crawfordsville Scrap and Salvage IndianaAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling

iv David John Property Indiana Hassan Barrel Company Indiana Hayes Lemmerz International Inc. Indiana Heritage Environmental Services Indiana Delatte Metals Louisiana Marine Shale Processors Louisiana American Recovery Corp., Inc. Maryland Boulden Incorporated Maryland Safety Kleen Corporation Maryland Spectron, Inc. Maryland JG Grant & Sons, Inc. Massachusetts Lubrx Products, Inc. Massachusetts Zimble Drum Massachusetts Carter Industrials Inc. Michigan Pellestar Limited Michigan Saran Protective Coatings Michigan Thermochem Inc. Michigan 2303 Kennedy Street Site Minnesota Hydromex Mississippi Industrial Pollution Control Mississippi Echo Valley Recycling Enterprises Missouri Missouri Electric Works Missouri Rogene French Alcohol Missouri Tetra Micronutrients (formerly American Microtrace) Nebraska Beede Waste Oil New Hampshire Consolidated Recycli ng, Inc. New HampshireAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling

v Harding Metals, Inc. New Hampshire Atlantic Resources Corporation New Jersey Boro Auto Wreckers New Jersey Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc. New Jersey Cycle Chem Incorporated New Jersey Franklin Burn New Jersey Griffin Pipe Products C ompany New Jersey Horseshoe Road New Jersey Lightman Drum Company New Jersey Martin Aaron, Inc. New Jersey Matteo Iron and Metal New Jersey Old Bridge Chemicals, Inc. / Madison Industries New Jersey Pittsburgh Metal & Equipment New Jersey Safety

- Kle en Envirosystems Company New Jersey South Brunswick Asphalt New Jersey Zschiegner Refining Co. New Jersey Cal West Metals New Mexico Pagano Salvage New Mexico Back Waste Oil New York Bern Metals New York Consolidated Iron and Metal New York ENRX, Inc. (formerly Voelker Analysis) New York Feldman Barrel & Drum New York Hudson Technologies, Inc. New York Mercury Refining, Inc. New York Revere Smelting and Refining Corporation of NJ New York Battery Tech (Duracell

- Lexington) North CarolinaAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling

vi Nucor Corporation, Inc. North Carolina American Recycling Company Ohio Century 21 Paints Ohio Columbus Steel Drum Company Ohio County Line Auto Parts (Imthurn Drum Site) Ohio Environmental Processing Services Ohio Master Metals Inc. Ohio Midwest Guardian Ohio ONARP Inc. (Mel's Battery) Ohio Queen City Barrel Co. Ohio River Recycling Industries, Inc. Ohio Safety

- Kleen (Hebron) Ohio Sentco Paints Ohio Smith Chemical Ohio Chief Supply/Greenway Environmental Oklahoma Parawax Reclaiming, Inc. Oklahoma Baron Blakeslee Oregon Bergsoe Metal Corporation Oregon Dennis Residence Oregon Environmental Pacific Corporation Oregon Grant Warehouse Oregon High

- Tech Now Oregon Lighting Recyclers, Inc. Oregon Thermo Fluids Oregon Breslube

- Penn, Inc. Pennsylv ania East Penn Manufacturing Co, Inc. Pennsylvania Franklin Slag Pile (MDC Industries, Inc.) PennsylvaniaAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling

vii Gettysburg Foundry Specialties Company Pennsylvania Industrial Solvents and Chemical Co. Pennsylvania PECO Energy Company (Exelon) Pennsylvania Tonolli Corporation Pennsylvania Scorpio Recycling, Inc. Puerto Rico V&M/Albaladejo Puerto Rico Efros Barrel Co. Rhode Island Metals Recycling, LLC Rhode Island New England Container Co. Rhode Island Aqua

- Tech Environmental, Inc. (Groce Laboratories) South Carolina Conbraco Industries South Carolina Huff Battery Salvage South Carolina College Grove Battery Chip Tennessee Dixie Barrel and Drum Tennessee Far Star Tennessee Jack Goins Waste Oil Tennessee Refined Metals Tennessee Ross Metals, Inc

. Tennessee Aztec Mercury Texas Baldwin Waste Oil Texas CFF Recycling Titanium Fire Texas Dixie Oil Processors, Inc. Texas Encycle/ Texas Inc. Texas J. C. Pennco Waste Oil Service Texas Lyon Property Texas Malone Services Company

- Swan Lake Plant Texas Many Diversified Interests TexasAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling

viii McBay Oil and Gas Texas Melton Kelly Property Texas Poly

- Cycle Industries, Tecula Texas Rockwool Industries, Inc. Texas Voda Petroleum Inc. Texas Intermountain Waste Oil Refinery Utah OMG Air Emissions Utah Petrochem Recycling Corp./Ekotek Plant Utah Bingham & Taylor Virginia Old Salem Tannery II Virginia Safety

- Kleen Systems, Inc. Virginia Bay Zinc Company Inc. Washington Beacon Battery Company Washington CleanCare Corporation Washington Dyno Battery Washington Emerald Recycling Washington Hand in Hand Recycling Washington Island Recycling Washington Maralco Washington Nooksack Valley Disposal Washington Northwest Transformer (Mission/Pole) Washington Reflex Recycling Washington SafCo Environmental Washington Red Jacket Salvage Yard West Virginia Waste Research & Reclamation Co. WisconsinAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Alabama

1 Site Information Site Name: American Brass EPA ID No.: ALD981868466 Address: State Highway 134 West, Headland, AL 36345 County: Henry NPL Site: Fi nal: 5/10/99 In CERCLIS Database: 0406299 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The American Brass Inc., (ABI) site is a former secondary brass smelter/foundry facility. The ABI site area is approximately 148 acres, 24 acres of which are occupied by the former foundry buildings (the developed portion of the site) in a predominantly rural agricultural area. Industrial operations were conducted at the ABI site from the 1960's until December 1992. The process at American Brass, Inc. was a s follows: brass

- and copper

- bearing scrap material were charged into the rotary furnaces and melted. Alloying and fluxing agents were added to obtain a spec alloy. The metal was cast into ingot form and the remaining slag was taken for further processing . The ingots were allowed to cool. The slag was processed through the crusher and then into the ball mill. Brass particles were recovered from the crushed slag and reprocessed in the furnace. The slag was then sent to storage bins. Fume from the furnaces and particulate emissions from the crusher and ballmill were controlled by two baghouses. The baghouse dust was collected and sold as a finished product. Approximately 150,000 tons of heavy metal

- contaminated furnace waste, ball mill residues, and furnace s lag were stockpiled in the facility at various areas on the ground and in a large uncontrolled stockpile approximately one

- third mile southeast of the facility. Residuals from the brass smelting process, which contained high levels of lead, were ground an d recycled as peanut fertilizer. From approximately the mid

- 1980's until the facility closed, ABI was the subject of several RCRA enforcement actions, both state and federal. RCRA violations included the on

site disposal of hazardous waste. Descriptio n of Contamination : On February 22, 1996, the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM ) conducted a site Investigation at American Brass, Inc. ADEM collected aqueous samples and sediment samples from Dunham Creek, Cedar Creek, and the breach in the berm around the ball mill stockpile, which drains into a tributary to Cedar Creek. Aqueous samples collected in Dunham Creek showed a release of barium; the sediment samples indicated a release of barium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, and zinc. Aque ous samples collected from Cedar Creek indicated a release of barium; the sediment samples indicated a release of barium, chromium, and zinc. Aqueous samples collected below the breach in the berm showed a release of barium, copper, lead, and zinc; the sediment samples showed a release of barium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, and zinc. The Remedial Investigation revealed impacts to onsite soils and sediments primarily from heavy metals, boron and PCBs. At the request of ADEM, USEPA conducted an emergency removal at the ABI site in 1996

- 1997. During this removal, excavated lead

- contaminated soils and heavy metal

- laden furnace bricks, as well as heavy metal

- laden process waste materials (ball mill residue) found inside the buildings, were consolidated into a liner

- covered waste pile at the southeast corner of the site. AAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Alabama

2 second USEPA removal action to remove the waste pile and dispose of the materials off site was completed in March 1999. More sampling was scheduled for February 2002 to determine the ex tent of contamination off site in these creeks. The groundwater at the site has been impacted with boron, nitrate , and ammonia. The residential drinking water wells adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site have not been impacted by the site and will co ntinue to be monitored. Total cleanup expenditure at this site as of September 2004 was $7,325,902.41. Sources of Information: EPA Region 4. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 31 October 2005. USEPA. “American Brass.” CERC LIS

. 27 October 2005 . 16 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0406299 USEPA. “American Brass.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 16 J anuary 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110001146778 USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 15 January 2006. USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: American Brass.” 12 December 2005. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/npl/nplal/albrasal.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Narr ative for American Brass.” 7 October 2004. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar1538.htm Additional Contacts: Brian Farrier (Project Manager) , farrier.brian@epa.gov Anna Lesichar (Senior Enforcement Specialist USEPA Region 4) , (404) 562

- 8608Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Alabama

3 Site Information: Site Name: Interstate Lead Co. (ILCO) EPA ID No.: ALD041906173 Address: 1247 Borden Avenue SE, Leeds, AL 35094 County: Jefferson NPL Site: Final: 06/10/86 In CERCLIS Database: 0404344 Description of Recycling Operation: The ILCO facility operated as a secondary lead smelter and lead battery recycling facility from 1970 to 1992 , at which time the site w as abandoned. From approximately 1970 to 1984, the company reportedly used lead

- contaminated materials such as blast furnace slag, battery casings, and wastewater treatment sludge as fill material at seven satellite sites in and around the City of Leeds: ILCO Parking Lot, Gulf/BP Service Station (currently operated as a BP Service Station), J & L Fabricators, Flemmings Patio, the Connell Property, the City of Leeds Landfill, and the Church of God of Prophecy in Acmar (herein referred to as the Acmar Church of God). ILCO ceased operations in March 1992 and declared bankruptcy shortly thereafter. Shortly after this abandonment, USEPA issued Records of Decision ( RODs ) for each of the three operable units comprising the site. This site was never RCRA permi tted. Description of Contamination : ILCO's battery cracking and recycling operations have resulted in extensive lead and cadmium contamination on and near the ILCO main facility in soil, surface water, and groundwater. Monitoring by the company in January and February of 1985 detected lead and cadmium in ground water underlying the facility. The state has measured elevated levels of lead in Dry Creek and an unnamed tributary to Dry Creek adjacent to the facility. The Jefferson County Department of Health in 1983 and 1984 measured elevated lead concentrations in ambient air south and southwest of ILCO. USEPA collected surface water, sediment, and biota samples during 1994 from the unnamed tributary, Dry Creek, and the Little Cahaba River and analyzed them for lead and other chemicals. The estimated cost of implementing selected remedies was approximately $60,000,000. As the state of Alabama did not have sufficient resources to fund the state cost share, a fund

- lead cleanup was not an option. Based upon ILCO's operating records, USEPA identified approximately 979 PRPs who sent spent batteries or other lead

- bearing waste material to the site. USEPA issued notice letters to these potentially responsible parties (PRPs ) in the fall of 1993. Special Notice Letters were issued to large quantity generators in the fall of 1995. On September 30, 1996, the Region requested D epartment of Justice to concur in a settlement with 20 generator PRPs at the ILCO site. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, the settlin g defendants will conduct RD/RA for the entire site , including all seven satellite sites, and will reimburse the United States for $1,823,644 of $16,683,773 in past response costs. Also, the ILCO PRPs will reimburse the United States for future oversight c osts related to the Consent Decree in excess of $300,000. Under the guidance on orphan share compen sation dated June 3, 1996, the Region, with headquarters concurrence, has agreed to compensate the settling defendants by giving themAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Alabama

4 a credit of $14,860,125 against outstanding past costs , which represents 25 percent of the estimated future cleanup costs. This settlement is one of the first to provide for compensation to settlers under the orphan share reform in accordance with the recently issued guidance. In addition, proceeds from de minimis settlements will be evenly split between USEPA and the settling defendants , with USEPA 's share to be applied against outstanding past costs. Based upon de minimis settlements totaling over $1.8 million, the PRPs were wired over $900,000 in May 1999. Total cleanup expenditure as of September 2004 was $13,596,768.92. Sources of Information : USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Interstate Lead Co.” 29 September 1995. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0495243.pdf USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 15 January 2006. USEPA. “Interstate Lead Co.” CERCLIS

. 25 August 2006. 10 October 2006

. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0404344 USEPA. “Interstate Lead Co.” EPA Envirofacts Warehouse . (n.d). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110017418007 USEPA. “Interstate Lead Co.” RCRAInfo . 2 September 2000. 18 January 2006. USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Interstate Lead Co.” 12 December 2005. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/npl/nplal/ilcoal.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Interstate Lead Co.” 10 June 1986. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0404344.pdf USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for ILCO.” 6 June 2006. 10 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=ALD041906173Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Arkansas

5 Site Information Site Name: Red River Aluminum EPA ID No.: AR0000605322 Address: US HWY 80 P.O. Box 99 Stamps, AR 71860 County: Lafayette NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0605322 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This facility is a bankrupt secondary smelter operation which extracted aluminum from the byproduct of conventional aluminum smelting. It reprocessed dross, an impure aluminum surface sum fro m the electrolytic cells of various primary aluminum smelters, to recover additional aluminum. The facility also processed recycled aluminum. The site has been abandoned for several years. It operated from 1988 to 1998 or 1985 to 1997 (sources vary) , during which time it generated a waste pile containing approximately 175,000 cubic yards of aluminum dross and salt cake. Description of Contamination : The primary pollutants are sodium chloride, potassium chloride, and copper. During its operation, USEPA estimates more than 200,000 cubic yards of accumulated salt cake containing elevated levels of copper were exposed to the elements and contaminated nearby soil and surface water and threatened shallow ground water beneath the site. None of the pollutants are present in the groundwater at a level that causes a human health concern. On Nov. 7, 2000, USEPA began taking action at the site to eliminate the most immediate environmental threats posed by the exposed saltcake materials containing elevated level s of copper. Immediate action was taken to prevent the copper

- contaminated runoff from adversely affecting nearby streams and marshes, which also prevented saltcake from being blown by heavy winds into nearby residential areas. Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality ( ADEQ ) Director Richard A. Weiss said that the State of Arkansas and USEPA successfully worked together to secure the site and address the most pressing public health concerns . He added that the federal government's expenditure of $2 mi llion was vital to halting contamination of the environment surrounding the site. Residents allege that site

- related contaminants might have caused the following health conditions: diabetes, high blood pressure, cancer (no type specified), skin, eye, and respiratory tract irritation, asthma, and skin rashes. Sources of Information: Arkansas Department of Health under agreement with Agency for Toxic Substance & Disease Registry. “Health Consultation, Assessment of Indoor Air in Residences Adjacent to the Red River Aluminum Site in Stamps, Arkansas

. ” 17 July 2003. 16 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/redriver/rra_p1.html#back USEPA. “Cleanup Effort at Red River Aluminum Complete.” 11 October 2001. 16 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Arkansas

6 http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/7474083079d775f8852570d6005e7dbe?Ope nDocument USEPA. “Red River Aluminum.” CERCLIS

. 25 August 2006

. 10 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursite s/csitinfo.cfm?id=0605322 USEPA. “Red River Aluminum.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin =110001149294 USEPA. “Red River Aluminum Site Cleanup Begins.” 8 November 2000. 24 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/0290c 4651fdf42e2852570d6005e7d9f?Open Document Additional Contacts: Philip Ofosu (SAM) , (214) 665

- 3178 Susan Webster (OSC) , (214) 665

- 6784Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

7 Site Information Site Name: Alco Pacific EPA ID No.: CAD008387250 Address: 16914 South Broadway, Carson, CA 90248 County: Los Angeles NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Alco Pacific has operated as a lead recycling facility since 1954. The primary sources of lead were automobile batteries. The batteries were cracked open, drained of acid and the lead recovered. The rubber debris from seals and plate separators w as the only part of the battery that was not recyclable. This waste was stored in a pile on

- site. A second pile was comprised of foundry san ds used to make molds. When the facility ceased operations in 1990, 1,248 cubic yards of rubber debris (lead content 43,000 parts per million (ppm)) and 126 cubic yards of sand (lead content 1,300 ppm) were left abandoned on

- site. These piles were located on pavement. H owever, there was no other containment to prevent wind dispersal of wastes or to prevent rain leachate from running off of the property. Ninety

- eight drums of assorted wastes were also found on the site. Forty

- six of these drums were found s cattered throughout the site and were buried in the waste piles that contained resins, catalysts, slag recyclable lead, rainwater/ rinseate, and debris. Fifty

- two of the drums contained "mixed waste." The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC ) Facilities Management Branch, who was handling the issues of illegal operation as a treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD ) facility, referred the Alco Pacific site to the Site Mitigation Branch after it was apparent that there were no funds availabl e to conduct a RCRA closure. Removal of all known wastes (except the 52 drums of mixed waste) was conducted with state funds to eliminate an immediate risk to the public from lead exposure. The waste piles of rubber and sand were disposed in November 1993 and the drummed wastes in April 1994. The mixed waste drums came to be at Alco when in August of 1988, a load of slag being disposed by Alco Pacific tripped a radiation alarm at the Casmalia facility. A subsequent inspection by Los Angeles County determine d that the source of radiation came into Alco Pacific via a shipment of lead gauge holders (radiation shields). Evidently, one gauge (radiation source) was left in the gauge holder. When this shipment went through the furnace, it contaminated the air pollution control system (bag house), slag, and refractory brick (thermal insulation) within the furnace itself. The bag house dust is normally considered to be a "toxic" waste because of the levels of lead and cadmium. By adding the additional radioactive cons tituent of Cesium 137, the waste stream became what is known as a "mixed waste

. " The disposal options for mixed wastes are additionally restricted since the disposal facility must comply with engineering specifications for not only radioactive wastes, but toxic wastes as well. Alco Pacific received a Radioactive License from the Department of Health Services, Radiological Health Branch, to store this material on a long term basis. After failing four stabilization tests, the Environ Facility in Utah accepte d the mixed waste. The mixed waste was removed, under order to J.C. Shepard in June 1997. The USEPA emergency response removed all residual surface contamination, equipment and buildings in September 1998.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

8 Description of Contamination : When operations ce ased at this site there were piles located on pavement. However, there was no other contaminant to prevent wind dispersal of wastes or to prevent rain leachate from running off of the property. Groundwater contamination data is not available at this time. As of September 2004 expense costs at this site totaled $236,844.33. Sources of Information: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Alco Pacific.” EnviroStor Database. (n.d.). 10 October 2006. http://www.envirostor .dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=19340753 USEPA. “Alco Pacific.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000913370 USEPA. “Alco Pacific, Inc.” Archived Sites

. 25 August 2006. 10 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/arcsites/csitinf o.cfm?id=0904453 USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 13 January 2006. USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for ILCO.” 6 June 2006. 10 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=CAD008387250

Additional Contacts: Lori Parnass (PM) , (818) 551

- 2856, lparnass@dtsc.ca.gov Jere Johnson (SAM) , 415

- 972

- 3094 Matt Mitguard (SAM) , 415

- 972

- 3096Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

9 Site Information Site Name: Baron Blakeslee EPA ID No.: CAD074644659 Address: 8333 Enterprise Dr., Newark CA 94560 County: Alameda NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Baron Blakeslee was a chemical storage and distribution center that is no longer in operation. In the past , the facility also operated as a solvent recovery center for recovery of fluorinated and chlorinated solvents from waste liquids. As a result of underground storage tank (UST) closure activities (Clo sure Report, December 13, 1995), the fire department recommended that the facility investigate their groundwater

. As a result, the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) began cleanup activities at the facility. A CWC 13267 request for a technical report (January 27, 1994) stated that the high levels of contaminants in soil and the ground water should be examined. Baron Blakeslee was issued a RCRA permit on November 13, 1992 after its original RCRA permitted issued on November 7, 1983 expired on No vember 7, 1988. Description of Contamination : The facility’s soil and groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and a ground water plume has migrated offsite approximately 1000 feet to the west. Concentrations in ground water are as high as 130 mg/L (ppm) for trichloroethylene (TCE). The revised site cleanup requirements order interim remedial actions for soils and groundwater , as well as the proposal of a final remedial alternative. Cleanup is on

- going. H owever, the current cl eanup cost is not available. Sources of Information : Cherie McCaulou (RWQCB) (510) 622

- 2342, Interview

. 8 December 2005. USEPA. “Baron Blakeslee.” Documentation of Environmental Indicator Determination

. 5 February 1999. 16 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/0/3a3dfc41fe9920c988256ac500795f3d/$FILE/B aron%20659%20EI%2000.pdf USEPA. “Baron Blakeslee.” Enviro facts Data Warehouse . (n.d). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000621284 USEPA. “Baron Blakeslee.” RCRA Correctiv e Action Environmental Indicator Forms Addendum . 3 October 2000. 16 January 2006. http://yosemite. epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/92e28fb9e2f1a35a88256a72006760cb/3a3dfc41fe 9920c988256ac500795f3d/$FILE/Baron%20659%20+%2000.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

10 USEPA. “Baron Blakeslee.” RCRAInfo. 27 June 2002. 10 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcris_web.report?pgm_sys_id=CAD074644659 USEPA. “Baron Blakeslee.” CERCLIS. 25 August 2006. 10 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0900268 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Newark.” 6 June 2006. 10 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=CAD074644659Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

11 Site Information Site Name: Berman Steel

- Salinas EPA ID No.: CAD981624950 Address: Highway 101 at Spence Road, Salinas, CA 93908 County: Monterey NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Berman Steel leased this two

- acre property from Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (SPTCo.) and operated a scrap metal recycling and salvage yard facility. The facility used electrical transformers from Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) , which were dismantled on the property for recycling. During recycling operations, PCBs from used transformers were spilled onto the ground. Heavy metal contamination also resulted from recycling operations. Description of Contamination : Contaminants at this site included lead, PCBs, copper and compounds, and zinc. A remedial action plan was completed on August 26, 1992. 1,377.2 cubic yards of soils were excavated and disposed at a hazardous waste landfill. The existing concrete pads at the site were demolished and used as a foundation for the cap. The entire site was capped with clayey soils and vegetative cover. A deed restriction limiting future use of the property was recorded. Post

closure activities will consist of yearly inspection of the cap for indications of erosion, cracking , or p onding of surface water. Any damage found in the cap will be repaired with soil cap material or topsoil. The cap cover will be sampled yearly to determine if the contaminants are being taken up by the vegetation. Vegetative cover will be cut yearly to prev ent the growth of woody species. Also, there will be a 5

- year review to verify that the cleanup measures remain satisfactory. Sources of Information: Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Berman Steel

- Salinas.” EnviroStor Database

. (n.d.) 15 January 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=27350001 US EPA. “Ebstone & Son, Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.) 20 February 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcris_web.report?pgm_sys_id=CAD981624950 Additional Contacts : Monica Gan (Project Manager) , mgan@dtsc.ca.gov , 510

- 540

- 3748Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

12 Site Information Site Name: Chemical and Pigment Company EPA ID No.: CAD009159476 Address: 600 Nichols Road, Pittsburg , CA 94565 County: Contra Costa NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site Hi story and Description of Recycling Operation: Beginning in 1960 , this facility processed zinc from galvanizing waste (zinc fines and dust containing trace metal contaminants) to manufacture agricultural products, such as fertilizers and soil amendments. The zinc fines contained metals that included lead, cadmium, and copper. On November 5, 1997, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control ( DTSC ) issued an administrative enforcement action against the facility for violations of the California H azardous Waste Control Law. The enforcement action was resolved by a Stipulation and Order, effective March 16, 1998, which required the company to pay $50,000 in penalties. In addition, DTSC determined that in order for the facility to continue its oper ations, a hazardous waste facility permit would be required. Although the facility submitted a standardized permit application in 1998, the facility ceased operations after filing for bankruptcy. It was an unpermitted hazardous waste facility. The site consists of eight buildings and other process equipment, a capped surface impoundment and approximately 15,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil that has been stockpiled on site. The site is completely fenced with an access gate on both the east and north s ides. State funds are being used to investigate the property. Contamination and Relationship to Recycling at the Site: In 1978, a surface impoundment was built to contain fluid by

- products of the manufacturing process. In 1996 , the surface impoundment was capped in

- place. In January 2002, DTSC’s Emergency Response Unit took measures to stabilize the site and protect public health and the environment. These measures included, covering the soil pile, putting locks on the gates, repairing holes in the fence, putting hay bales around the site, removing abandoned chemicals that remained in the company laboratory, removing all liquid waste from the tanks, and removing drummed and bagged waste from the property. In October 2002, DTSC issued an Imminent and S ubstantial Endangerment Determination and Order which gave DTSC the ability to conduct additional investigation and cleanup activities at the site. In December 2002, DTSC collected samples from the storm water runoff and found elevated levels of lead and z inc. In January 2003, a storm water treatment system was installed to collect and treat the rainwater that accumulates on the site. The water is treated to remove the contaminants and discharges into a sanitary sewer under a permit from the Delta Diablo Sanitation district.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

13 Future cleanup actions include plans to stockpile soil and off

- site disposal. The estimated volume of the contaminated soil stockpile to be treated is 15,000 cubic yards. Sources of Information: California Department of Toxic Substanc es and Control. “Chemical & Pigment Company.” EnviroStor database. (n.d.) 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=07280017 California Department of Toxic Substances and Control. “Chemical & Pigment Site Fact Sheet.” May 2003. 23 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Projects/upload/Chemical

- Pigment_FS.pdf California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Docket No. IS&E 02/03

- 005: Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Determination And Order.” 18 October 2002. 23 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca. gov/SiteCleanup/Projects/upload/Chemical

- Pigment

Co_ISE_Order.pdf USEPA. “Chemical and Pigment Company A Division of ESI Chem.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.) 10 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110002635738 Additional Contacts: Jayantha Randeni ( DTSC Project Manager) , (510) 540

- 3806Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

14 Site Information Site Name: Commodity Refining Exchange EPA ID No.: CAD981402522 Address: 11847 United Street, Mojave, CA 93501 County: Kern NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Commodity Refining Exchange (CRE) has been operating since 1970 , recovering precious metals, primaril y silver from photographic film and limited quantities of gold from circuit boards. The site's previous owners recovered copper (Cu) and lead (Pb) from circuit boards and insulated wire. Incineration of these materials produced a waste dioxin ash that was deposited on various portions of the site. The site was identified in 1988 as a result of contamination from discharges

. Description of Contamination : Because of the nature of the waste materials, the major pathway of contamination is airborne transport by prevailing winds. The site is fenced to prevent direct contact to the community. There is contaminated soil , but currently no evidence of groundwater contamination. In May 1990, a polymer coating was applied to portions of the property to prevent migration by wind. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC ) issued an I/SE Order to CRE and other potentially responsible parties (PRPs ) in February 1991. A removal action (RA) was conducted in June 1992 in the effected area. The RA involved the hot spot removal of baghouse ash from the surface soils. These areas were restabilized with a soil sealant.
An remedial investigation and feasibility study ( RI/FS ) characterizing the extent of contamination in the effected area was complete d in June 1993. The responsible party has submitted a draft Remedial Action Plan ( RAP ) for review and approval from the DTSC . The RAP proposes to cap in place, the effected area. DTSC approved a RAP in June of 1995. The RAP calls for the capping of the contaminated areas with a geofab liner under a concrete cap. Because the affected area had been stabilized to give CRE the ability to budget construction cap into its operation, CRE was allowed to construct the cap over a 46

- month period. CRE implemented the Remedial Actions described in the RAP in 1996. Due to its long operating history , much of the contamination probably occurred before 1982. The total amount spent on cleanup at this site is approximately $200,000. Sources of Information: California D epartment of Toxic Substances Control. “Commodity Refining Exchange.” EnviroStor database

. (n.d.)

. 12 October 2006

. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=15330008 Domingo, Danny. California Department of Toxic Substances Control (Project Manager), ddomingo@dtsc.ca.gov, Email

. 8 December 2005

.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

15 Deed Restriction Document. “Commodity Refining Exchange.” 4 February 1997. 16 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Deeds/upload/SMBR_DEED_15330008.pdf USEPA. “Commodity Resource and Environment.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d). 21 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110002695450 Additional Contacts: Danny Domingo (Project Manager) , (559) 297

- 3932 DDomingo@dtsc.ca.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

16 Site Information Site Name: Cooper Drum Co. EPA ID No.: CAD055753370 Addres s: 9316 Atlantic Ave., South Gate , CA 90280 County: Los Angeles NPL Site: Final: 06/14/2001 In CERCLIS Database: 0903253 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: From 1941 until 1992, drum recycling was conducted at this site by various ow ners. From 1971 to 1992, the Cooper Drum Co. reconditioned closed

- topped, steel drums that previously held a variety of industrial chemicals. In a 1991 interview, Cooper Drum Co

. representatives stated that approximately 70 percent of the drums accepted for recycling were from oil companies, with the remaining 30 percent including paint, resin, and solvent drums. The reconditioning operation at this site was set up as an assembly line process along the length of an elevated concrete floor in the so uthern portion of the property. It essentially consisted of flushing and stripping the drums with sodium hydroxide in preparation for painting and resale. Fluids generated by the reconditioning operation were conveyed to two holding tanks and five clarifi ers that bordered the north side of the elevated floor. The settled

- out contents were pumped out and transported off site for recycling or disposal. The liquid was circulated back into the reconditioning process. Prior to the late 1980s, the holding tanks and clarifiers consisted of open concrete sumps that were connected to each other and the reconditioning process tanks (e.g., flushers and strippers) by open concrete trenches. Since then, closed

- top steel tanks were installed over the sumps, with the sumps providing secondary containment, and the trenches were replaced with hard piping. Until 1992, the hard wash operation was conducted in the northern portion of the property and consisted of placing chains and sodium hydroxide inside the drums, and then rotating the drums over four concrete sump s that were fitted with grates. In 1992, the hard wash operation was moved to the east end of the drum reconditioning facility o n the southern portion of the property. The sumps in the former hard wash area are no longer in use. In April 1987, the Los Angeles County Health Department (LACHD) Emergency Response Team responded to an incident at the Tweedy Elementary School property. An unknown quantity of highly caustic liquid waste had migrated via underground seepage from the Cooper Drum Co. property. The waste resulted from the caustic wash water from the drum recycling process line located in the building directly north of the school property. Initially, the waste was thought to comprise mainly sodium hydroxide an d oil. When contamination migrated onto school property, the top layer of soil was excavated and the area was paved. Due to public health concerns, Tweedy Elementary School has remained closed. In 1987, the City of South Gate also closed four municipal wel ls due to volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination. However, evidence suggests that the shallow aquifer and the lower Silverado Aquifer are hydraulically connected, allowing the water to move between them. Municipal wells located within 4 miles of the site supply drinking water to approximately 335,000 people; the nearest of these wells isAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

17 located within 1/2 mile of the site. An estimated 340,000 people live within 4 miles of the site. The Cooper Drum Co. was sold to a new drum company in 1992, which employs 50 on

- site workers. Description of Contamination : Analytical results from soil and sampling events conducted in 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1994, 1996, and 1998, and a soil gas sampling in 1999, indicate that VOCs are present at elevated concentratio ns in soils and soil gas beneath the concrete floor of the reconditioning facility, proximal to the holding tanks and clarifiers, in the former hard wash area, and in other areas of the site. Analytical results from 1996 and 1998 monitoring well groun d water sampling events and a 1998 Hydropunch (TM) groundwater sampling event indicate the presence of VOCs at concentrations significantly above background levels in the two uppermost aquifers (Bellflower and Exposition aquifers) beneath and hydraulically downgradient of the former hard wash area. The Bellflower, Exposition, and Gage aquifers are interconnected within 2 miles of the Cooper Drum Co

. site. Eleven municipal drinking water wells, which draw from the Exposition and Gage aquifers, are located within 4 miles of the site. Immediate actions at this site consisted of the excavation of contaminated soils at the Tweedy Elementary School in April of 1987 and soil and groundwater analysis. The selected remedy for soil uses dual phase extraction for tre atment of VOCs in soil. Other non

- VOC soil contaminants, including SVOCs, PCBs, and lead, will be excavated for disposal. Institutional controls will be implemented to prevent exposure to soil contaminants where excavation is not feasible. The total cos t of this cleanup in 2002 was $2.77 million. The cleanup strategy for groundwater contaminated with VOCs will use a combination of methods to achieve remedial goals and to restore the potential beneficial use of the aquifer as a drinking water source. The total cost in 2002 for this cleanup was $5.36 million. Sources of Information: Agency of Toxic Substances & Disease Registry. “Preliminary Public Health Assessment: Cooper Drum.” 7 February 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/cooperdrum/coo_p1.html NOAA’s National Ocean Service: Office of Response and Restoration. “Coastal Hazardous Waste Site Review: Cooper.” (n.d.) 7 February 2006. http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/book_shelf/159_Cooper.pdf USEPA. “Cooper Drum Company.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 7 February 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0903253 USEPA. “Cooper Drum Company.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d). 7 February 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110001167399

.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

18 USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Cooper Drum Co.” 27 September 2002. 7 February 2006. http ://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0902029.pdf USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Cooper Drum Co.” (n.d.) 7 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplfs/fs0903253.pdf USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Cooper Drum Co.” 14 June 2001. 7 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0903253.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Fact Sheet: Cooper D rum Co.” June 2002. 7 February 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/sfund/fsheet.nsf/024b c4d43f9aa0f48825650f005a714e/d1c4cd bd55c6bfe188256ff900678d10/$FILE/cooper

- drum

- proposed

- plan%2006

- 02.PDF USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Cooper Drum Co. CERCLIS . 25 August 2006. 10 October 2006. Additional Contacts: Eric Yunker (EPA Si te Manager) , (415) 972

- 3159, yunker.eric@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

19 Site Information Site Name: Davis Chemical Company EPA ID No.: CAD070215355 Address: 1550 North Bonnie Beach Pl. Los Angeles, CA 90063 County: Los Angeles NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Davis Chemical Company operated as a recycler of spent solvents and transporter of waste solvents from various small manufacturing operations from 1949 until 1990, when it went out of business. Davis reportedly accepted and processed wastes using distillation chlorinated and petroleum

- based solvents throughout its operational history. Since 1953, the predominant process at the facility has been reclaiming ac etone/polyester resin wastes from the fiberglass industry. However, according to hazardous waste manifests, other types of solvents were also sent to the facility. The property is located on a 1/3

- acre lot in East Los Angeles in a light industrial area that includes some residential use. Davis collected waste polyester resin dissolved in acetone in 55

- gallon drums. The solutions were then pumped into an 800

- gallon feed tank that served as the distillation equipment. After the solids settled, the acetone wa ste was distilled through one of two steam

- heated vaporization units (a 150

- gallon/hour unit and a 40

- gallon/hour unit). The distilled acetone was then placed in 55

- gallon containers for resale. Around 1980, Davis installed four stainless steel undergroun d storage tanks (USTs) at the facility

- two 2,500

- gallon reclaimed solvent tanks and two 6,000

- gallon waste solvent tanks. No secondary containment or release controls were installed on these tanks. These USTs were removed under the supervision of Los An geles County Department of Public Works (LADPW) in November 1989. According to LADPW records, the sampling conducted in 1989 and 1990 by Davis and its contractor did not adequately address the possibility of a release from these tanks. From August 1, 199 0 , to October 23, 1990, Betterbilt Chemicals (EPA ID# CAD981686249) operated fuel blending activities and recovered acetone from waste polyester resins at the facility and also acted as a hazardous waste transporter. Flammable wastes (liquid and solid) were accepted at the facility and then shipped offsite for disposal by incineration at Systech Inc., a cement kiln facility in Lebec, California (EPA ID# CAT080031628). DTSC issued a Directive to Comply on October 23, 1990 , ordering Davis to cease and desist all hazardous waste treatment and storage operations, stating that the facility was conducting unpermitted operations such as accepting flammable solids and liquids, blending flammable solids and liquids as fuel for Systech Inc., and treating waste paint related material by distillation. US EPA conducted a preliminary assessment of the site in 1992 , noting “significant spillage , ” and recommended referral to the state RCRA program for further clean

- up administered by the California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

20 On October 2, 1997, DTSC’s Statewide Compliance Branch referred the site to DTSC’s Site Mitigation Program. In June 1999, i n an effort to commence the remedial investigation (RI) process and recover a ssociated costs, DTSC sent out information request letters to potentially responsible parties, namely Betterbilt, Diana Davis (a trustee of the Ernest Davis Estate), and Donald Williams, former manager of Davis. Betterbilt and Diana Davis responded to the letter but Donald Williams failed to respond. The response from Betterbilt stated that it had never owned or operated the facility but was at one point negotiating to purchase the property. Betterbilt said it never finalized the purchase because it was unable to obtain a permit to operate as a TSD facility. Betterbilt did not provide information concerning the type and quantities of hazardous substances it delivered to the facility, even though it was one of the transporters of hazardous waste to the facili ty, according to hazardous waste manifests obtained from DTSC’s headquarters office. Description of Contamination : A site reconnaissance visit by Ecology and Environment, Inc. in 1992 for the US EPA, revealed evidence of poor housekeeping, significant spi llage of waste solvents and resin, and deteriorated concrete flooring throughout the facility. Currently, hazardous wastes are not known to be stored on the property. The solvents managed at the facility through the recycling process included acetone, methylene chloride, trichloroethane (TCA), trichloroethene (TCE), tetrachloroethene (PCE), xylene, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), isopropyl alcohol (IPA), toluene, methanol, ethanol, and paint thinners. Smith

- Emery Geoservices analyzed 15 soil samples in November 1996. Eight of the samples were found to exceed the action levels of one or more of the following compounds: 1,1,2

- trichloroethane (TCA), tetrachloroethene (PCE), and 1,1,2,2

- tetrachloroethane. The hazardous waste regulatory level at the time for PCE in soil, according to title 22, California Code of Regulations, section 66261.24, was 700 ppb. No hazardous waste levels are specified for TCA and 1,1,2,2,

- tetrachloroethane in soil. The highest concentrations detected for 1,1,2,2

- tetrachloroethane, PCE and TCA were 16 ppb, 1200 ppb, and 64 ppb respectively. The boundary of the Central Groundwater Basin is approximately 1 mile south of the site. Two of the 1996 soil borings showed levels of some volatile organic compounds increasing with depth, thereby raisi ng the possibility that groundwater, if it exists beneath the site, may be contaminated. A 2002 Consent Order determined that the recyclers at the site should undertake the costs of cleanup and pay DTSC $20,000 for previous clean up costs. Sources of Inf

ormation: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Davis Chemical Company.” EnviroStor database. (n.d.) 12 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dt sc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=19281215Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

21 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “ Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Determination and Consent Order.” December 2002. 23 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Projects/upload/DavisChemicalCo_SMBRP_ENF_ ORDER_ISECO.pdf USEPA. “Davis Chem Co.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110002656117 Additional Contacts: Safouh Sayed , (714) 484

- 5478, ssayed@dtsc.ca.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

22 Site Information Site Name: Enviropur West Corporation EPA ID No.: CA0001562370 Address: 1835 E. 29 th St., Signal Hill, CA 90806 County: Los Angeles NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0905333 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Enviropur West Corporation treated h azardous waste and waste oil at its Signal Hill facility from 1984 until it went bankrupt in 1996. The Bankruptcy Trustee abandoned the Enviropur West property in September 1996, leaving behind tanks and drums containing approximately 1 million gallons of ignitable hazardous waste. The site also included abandoned tank trucks and semitrailers full of drums of waste. Many of the tanks and drums were rusted through and were releasing extremely hazardous organic vapors. Description of Contamination : The tank s and drums were releasing extremely hazardous organic vapors. The State of California asked USEPA for assistance with the site. USEPA immediately addressed the emergency by maintaining the flare vapor recovery system, providing site security at Enviropur , and removing the waste for off

- site treatment. USEPA ’s legal team went to work finding potentially responsible parties to pay for the removal. USEPA has reached a proposed agreement with some of the major generators, including 14 federal agencies

—pri marily military

— and nine private parties. Under the proposed agreement, these major generators will pay for 75 percent of the removal costs (estimated at $2.49 million). USEPA intends to pursue nonsettlers for the remaining costs of removal of the aboveground waste. Sources of Information : USEPA. “Enviropur West Corporation.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 16 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id =0905333 USEPA. “Enviropur West Corporation.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin =110000610269 USEPA. “EPA Responds to Emergency at Abandoned Facility: EPA Reaches Settlement to Pay for Waste Removal at Enviropur West Corporation.” June 1997. 16 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/sfund/fsheet.nsf/024bc4d43f9aa0f48825650f005a714e/18325 29aa3e920268825655b006ed2e1/$FILE/ENVPUR.PDF Additional Contacts : Richard Martyn (OSC) (415) 744

- 2 288 Jere Johnson (SAM) (415) 972

- 3094Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

23 Matt Mitguard (SAM) , ( 415 ) 972

- 3096 Dawn Richmond (SAM) , (415) 972

- 3097Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

24 Site Information Site Name: Federated Metals EPA ID No.: CAD009134636 Address: 1901 Cesar Chavez St. (formerly Army St.) San Francisco, CA 941 24 County: San Francisco NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived (as ASARCO) Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The site was previously owned by Federated Metals Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of ASARCO. Historic operation s at the site included the production of lead and brass ingots. Materials used in the production of these ingots were brass and bronze scrap metals, oxides of tin and lead, and pure forms of tin and lead. Oxides formed during the company’s smelting process to produce the ingots were removed and deposited onsite. DTSC estimates that during Federated Metals Corporation’s operations at the site from 1939 to 1987 approximately 122 cubic yards of lead slag and 1,500 cubic yards of crushed and washed battery boxe s (manufactured before 1950) were deposited on the property. Description of Contamination : DTSC found levels of lead and mercury in the site’s soil above US EPA industrial soil screening levels . In spring 2003 , the site was graded and paved with asphalt. A deed restriction was placed on the property to limit future uses of the site to industrial or commercial redevelopment. Bridgeview Management Company, the current property owner, has agreed to maintain the site. The $100,000 cleanup, certified in Novemb er 2003, was funded with state monies. Sources of Information: California Department of Toxic Substances and Control. “DTSC Certifies Federated Metals Site.” 12 December 2003. 16 October 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/PressRoom/upload/NEWS_2003_T

- 37

- 03.pdf California Department of Toxic Substances and Control. “Federated Metals Site Cleanup.” EnviroStor database

. (n.d). 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/publi c/profile_report.asp?global_id=38330005 USEPA. “Federated Metals Corp.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.) 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.g et_list?facility_uin=110002635328 Additional Contacts: Edgardo Gillera , (510) 540

- 3826, EGILLERA@dtsc.ca.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

25 Site Information Site Name: Gibson Environmental EPA ID No.: CAD980883177 Address: 2401 Gibson St. (end of Commercial Drive) , Bakersfield, CA 93308 County: Kern NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Gibson Environmental is an abandoned treatment and storage facility for waste oil and contaminated soil that operated from 1978 until 1 995. The property had been operated as an oil refinery since the 1940s. In 1978 , Gibson Oil and Refining bought the subject property and constructed a crude oil refining operation, which it operated on site until 1986. From June 1987 to October 1995 , the site was operated as Gibson Environmental and was primarily a used oil storage and soil treatment facility. It received used oil and certain other oily wastes , as well as contaminated soils, which were treated using a fixation process on

- site. The fac ility operated under a permit issued by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) on June 28, 1988, and was given interim status authorization obtained for newly regulated wastes on September 18, 1990. The permit and interim status authorization terminated on February 4, 1998 when DTSC denied the facility’s permit renewal and permit application, based in part on repeated violations, including:

• unauthorized acceptance, storage and treatment of hazardous waste;

• failure to comply with design and operating requirements for hazardous waste piles;

• failure to comply with water quality monitoring requirements; and

• failure to provide required liability insurance and closure cost financial assurance. In October 1994, DTSC filed a civil lawsuit against the o wners and operators of Gibson Environmental alleging numerous violations of hazardous waste laws. Gibson filed for bankruptcy and in 1995 stopped accepting new waste. Description of Contamination : DTSC issued an Imminent and/or Substantial Endangerment Determination and Order and Remedial Action Order to over 40 potentially responsible parties (PRPs ) after DTSC sampling of seventeen steel tanks, two poly

- tanks, three sumps, and multiple unlined, weathered waste piles from October 11, 1999, through October 15, 1999. DTSC estimated that there was approximately 850,000 gallons of contaminated wastewater, waste oil, and sludge present. The DTSC investigation uncovered evidence that six tanks had slow leaks, five had leaking valves, and one tank showed evidence of a seep from the sidewall. These tank wastes were contaminated with lead, PCB, benzene, and naphthalene. The tank farms were abandoned in 1995 and eroded until their cleanup.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

26 In 2000 , remediation at the site was being conducted under a state superfund clean up order. The site clean up is being funded and managed by a PRP group under DTSC’s Permitting Branch supervision. The PRP Group, under DTSC oversight, began cleanup work on January 17, 2000. Initial work focused on site security and liquid removal from the above ground storage tanks. The removal of sludge was initiated in September 2000, and demolition began in October of 2000. When the removal action was completed in June of 2001, approximately 740,000 gallons of liquids, including contaminated rainwater, and 1800 tons of sludge had been removed f rom the site and disposed of in several permitted hazardous waste facilities throughout the country. All tanks have been removed. In August 2002, a tall heating tower was taken down and removed from the site. In March 2003, additional surface equipment was taken down and removed. The only remaining surface equipment is a tank that will be used to hold water for future cleanup activities. In January 2003, chemical dust suppressant was applied to stabilize the soil piles. Field work implementing this work plan began in October of 2002. Initial data from this work has been evaluated and a work plan for additional follow

- up investigations was approved on June 16, 2003. This additional fi eld work was completed in July of 2003. As of August 2003, there was approximately 80,000 cubic yards of impacted soil stockpiled on

site in five large soil piles. This impacted soil is related to Gibson Environmental’s soil treatment activities. The PRPs developed a work plan, approved by DTSC in April 2001, to investigate the piles. The work was completed and the analytical results indicate that three of the soil stockpiles contain California hazardou s waste. These piles are contaminated with lead, PC Bs, benzene, naphthalene , and hydrocarbons and were subject to erosion and wind dispersion. As of 2000, the facility had site

- wide soil contamination especially in the tank farm area. Groundwater was also suspected to be contaminated. The site has shall ow groundwater and porous soil. There are residences and businesses nearby. There have been complaints from nearby businesses about particulates coming from the site. Sources of Information : California Department of Toxic Substances Control . “Department Denies Gibson Environmental Permit Appeal.” 18 February 1998. 16 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/PressRoom/upload/t

- 02

- 98.pdf California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Docket No. I&SE 99/00

- 002: Imminent and/or Substantial Endangerment Determination and Order and Remedial Action Order.” (n.d. ). 16 January 2006. http://165.235.1 11.242/HazardousWaste/Projects/upload/Gibson_ENF_order.pdf California Department of Toxic Substances. “I&S Order Issued to Bakersfield Facility.” 16 November 1999. 16 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/PressRoom/upload/t

- 23

- 99.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

27 California Department of Toxic Substances. “Update on Site Cleanup: Gibson Environmental.” August 2003. 16 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/HazardousWaste/Projects/upload/Gibson_FS_CA

- 0803.pdf USEPA. “Documentation of Determination: Gibson Environmental.” 5 February 1999. 16 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/0/2c0ad9846d8d31de88256ac50082b5b9/$FILE/ Gibson_177_EI_00.PDF USEPA. “Gibson Environmental.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000916359 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator Forms: Additional Questions: Gibson Enviro nmental.” 27 April 2000. 16 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/92e28fb9e2f1a35a8825 6a72006760cb/2c0ad9846 d8d31de88256ac50082b5b9/$FILE/Gibson%20177%20+%2000.pdf

Additional Contacts : Gregory Honzay (Project Manager, Hazardous Waste Management Program, DTSC) , (916) 255

- 6678, GHonzay@dtsc.ca.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

28 Site Information Site Name: GNB Incorporated (now Exide Technologies) EPA ID No.: CAD097854541 Address: 2700 S. Indiana St., Vernon CA 90023 County: Los Angeles NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived (as Gould Inc Metals Div LA Smelter) Site History and Description of Recycli ng Operation : The facility, formally known as GNB Incorporated (now Exide Technologies), is a lead smelter that refines and recycles lead bearing scrap materials primarily from spent lead

- acid batteries. The reclaimed lead is used to produce marketable le ad and lead alloys. The facility has been operating since 1922. Although some control measures are reportedly being taken by GNB to reduce future releases, little has been done to identify the nature and extent of past releases or to remediate such relea ses. In 1990, California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) completed a RCRA Facility Assessment. In 2002, DTSC issued a Corrective Action Consent Order requiring Exide to implement corrective action , including characterizing contamination o f 76 different units or areas of concern and Corrective Measures Implementation. In 2003, DTSC issued a Consent Order for the storage of used lead

- acid batteries at three off

- site locations. The Order assessed a $40,000 penalty, but delayed payment in light of Exide's 2002 petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The most recent RCRA compliance evaluation inspection was done by California on May 31, 2005. A compliance order was filed on June 30, 1999. It is unclear whether a penalty was associated with this order. Currently, the facility has an operating permit with approved controls in place. This site was never RCRA permitted. Description of Contamination : Significant contamination is present in all media at the facility. Lead levels in sediment f rom the stormwater retention basin (surface impoundment) were as high as 40 percent. There is also groundwater contamination, including trichloroethylene (TCE) at a maximum concentration of 2,600 ppb. A rendering plant (meat packaging) is located next to the facility, which may receive airborne contaminants from GNB. Additionally, it appears that there has been surface run

- off or discharges that contained lead to surface water from the site. During facility operations, dust is generated from contaminated soil both indoors and outdoors. Sources of Information : California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Docket HWCA 2005

- 0560 Stipulation and Order.” 15 November 2005. 16 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&pageid=1100 73Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

29 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Docket No.: P3

- 01/02

- 010.” 16 January 2006. http://165.235.111.242/HazardousWaste/Projects/upload/Exide_ENF_coraction_hwm_03 1203.pdf California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “GNB Batteries.” EnviroStor database. (n.d.) 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=19280087 EPA Region 9. “Documentation of Determination: GNB Incorporated.” 2 May 1999. 16 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/92e28fb9e2f1a35a88256a72006760cb/dfd67afce9 bbb9c288256ac50082d85e/$FILE/GNB%20541%20EI%2000.pdf EPA Region 9. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 22 November 2005. EPA Region 9. “RCRA Corrective Action Forms Addendum: GNB Incorporated.” 4 May 2 000. 16 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/92e28fb9e2f1a35a88256a72006760cb/dfd67afc e9 bbb9c288256ac50082d85e/$FILE/GNB%20541%20+%2000.pdf USEPA. “Exide Technologies Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 16 January 2006. http://oa spub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000609921 USEPA. “GNB Incorporated.” RCRAInfo . 7 November 2002. 18 January 2006. USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Exide Technologies.” 06 June 2006. 16 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=CAD097854541 Additional Contacts : Thomas Wideman , ( 323 ) 262

- 1101 Penny Nakashima, (818) 551

- 2900, pnakashima@dtsc.ca.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

30 Site Information Site Name: John Alexander Research EPA ID No.: CAD980887350 Address: 1753 Sierra Highway, Rosamond, CA 93560 County: Kern NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Dr. John Alexander recycled nickel catalysts at this 5

- acre site. The site was on the state superfund list and was part of the Rosamond Cancer Cluster Investigation. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC ) conducted an onsite inspection and inventory of waste in 1988 , and in the years that followed , conducted additional site inspections. USEPA issued an Administrative Order to Alexander Research in J anuary 1990. The Order required securing and repackaging all leaking drums; chemically characterizing all drummed materials; transporting off site for disposal or treatment of approximately 2,300 drums; cleaning out the onsite acid pits; and applying a polymer sealant to the soil. This work was completed in June 1990. DTSC issued an Imminent or Substantial Endangerment/ Remedial Action Order (I/SE & RAO) for this site in April 1991. A remedial investigation and feasibility study ( RI/FS ) were completed in May 1992. Bench scale treatability studies were conducted to determine the site specific viability of soil washing for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil. The results of this work did not support use of soil washing. Therefore, the remedial option proposed in the Draft Remedial Action Plan ( RAP ) is to consist of on

- site consolidation and capping. DTSC sued for response cost recovery in 1998. The 2002 court judgment in favor of DTSC was appealed. In 2003 , the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the decision. DTSC and Dr. Alexander negotiated the final settlement amount of $405,000 which covers DTS C costs through September 30, 2000, attorney fees of the Attorney General's office , and the CERCLA post judgment interest. Description of Contamination : The site is contaminated with heavy metals in waste piles, debris , and spillage on soils. The prop erty was reported to have approximately 500 drums containing nickel catalyst onsite. An on

- site sump contains hazardous levels of nickel (Ni), lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn). Copper (Cu), Ni and Pb were found at high concentrations in soil and waste samples obtained from the site. Arsenic (As), barium (Ba), beryllium (Be), cadmium (Cd), antimony (Sb), selenium (Se), thallium (Ti), vanadium (V) and Zn were also found at hazardous levels. A preliminary assessment with soil and groundwater sampling was done by DTSC in August 1988. Sources of Information: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “$405,000 Settlement Reached withAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

31 Dr. John Alexander.” 21 October 2003. 16 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&pageid=5317 3 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “John Alexander.” EnviroStor database

. (n.d.). 16 October 2006

. http://www.envirostor.dts c.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=15330004 EPA Region 9. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 22 November 2005. USEPA. “John Alexander Research.” CERCLIS database . 25 August 2006. 16 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/cactinfo.cfm?id=0903579 USEPA. “John Alexander Research.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 16 October 2006

. http://oaspub.epa.gov/en viro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110006468811 USEPA. “John Alexander Research.” RCRAInfo . 16 October 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

32 Site Information Site Name: K & D Salvage Yard EPA ID No.: Address: 600 South Union Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93307 County: Kern NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: From 1958 to 1989, the site was used as a metal recycler and storage facility. The site encompasses approximately 10 acres of fenced, vacant land, and is located in an area of town that houses light industry , commercial businesses, and some residences. Directly south of the site is the abandoned Benham and Johnson/Double “D” metal recycling facility. Though the sites are adjacent, they are being dealt with as two separate projects due to the different industrial activities that occurred at each of them. The site was used for storage and recycling of metal from 1958 until 1989, when it was abandoned by its owners. For the next 10 years , the site was subject to unauthorized dumping and occupied by transients. In October 1998, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) removed debris, such as household items and furniture, in preparation of conducting preliminary soil sampling in the winter of 1999. Descri ption of Contamination : On June 7, 1990, DTSC received an anonymous phone call indicating that wastes from old transformers and old cars were disposed of at the property. On August 15, 1990, the DTSC inspected the property and collected two soil samples. Field inspections showed the presence of waste materials spreading over the property and into an old pit. Soil samples collected at the site were found to contain elevated levels of copper, lead, and zinc. Samples were not analyzed for other chemicals , such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB s . On April 19, 1996, the Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (Kern County) notified the D TSC that soils at the former K&D Salvage Yard may have been contaminated with elevated levels of PCBs because PCBs were detected in the soils removed from the site. Analyses of the sampling in 1999 confirmed that site soil is contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and heavy metals, including lead and zinc. A remedial investigation report was completed in June 2000, a Risk Assessment was completed in May 2001 , and an Alternative Evaluation (AE) was completed in November 2001. The AE indicated that a removal action could be completed for around $1 million. Sources of Information: California Department of Toxic Substances and Control. “K & D Salvage.” EnviroStor database

. (n.d.) 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=15500001Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

33 California Department of Toxic Substances and Control. “K & D Salvage Fact Sheet.” February 2003. 23 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Projects/upload/K&DSalvage_FS_DRAW.pdf California Department of Toxic Substances and Control. “K & D Salvage Site Cleanup.” (n.d.). 23 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.c a.gov/database/CalSites/CALP001.CFM?IDNUM=15500001 Additional Contacts: Maria Gillette (DTSC ), (916) 255

- 3953, MGILLETT@dtsc.ca.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

34 Site Information Site Name: Liquid Chemical Corp. EPA ID No.: CAD990769465 Address: 10585 Industrial Avenue, Hanford, CA 93230 County: Kings NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0900394 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Liquid Chemical Corporation (LCC) is a former fertilizer manufacturer. The site was operational from 1970 until the late 1980's

. It produced liquid and dry zinc sulfate fertilizers utilizing hazardous waste (RCRA waste code K061) dust from the primary production of steel as a raw material. Mineral King Minerals (MKM) has leased the facility from LCC. MKM continues to produce zinc sulf ate fertilizer and other organic fertilizers utilizing non

- hazardous waste raw materials. LCC was near bankrupt in 2001 and the current lessee, M KM , was under no obligation to collect environmental data or remediate the site. Although not obligated to do so, the lessee has voluntarily conducted extensive soil excavation at the site. MKM has been working voluntarily with USEPA to address the contaminated surface soils by consolidating them into the former disp osal lagoons and capping them. MKM has verbal ly agreed to collect additional groundwater samples to determine if groundwater is impacted. This site was not RCRA permitted. Description of Contamination : Soils at the facility have been heavily impacted by metals contamination consisting of lead (at concentrations up to 7%), zinc, cadmium, chro mium, arsenic and others. Soil contamination is believed to occur primarily in surficial soils down to 2

- 3 feet below ground surface. Several large disposal ponds exist on site and contain waste sludge (now dry granular waste) with high concentrations of metals. Results from ground water monitoring data are inconclusive. H owever, older data is of poor quality, but suggests that metals have leached to groundwater at concentrations of concern. Additional data are needed to determine if LCC has impacted ground water. The primary contaminated media of concern in terms of human exposures is soil. Elevated lead blood levels in site workers were noted in 1985. Surface impoundments were not closed in 1984 because the faci lity was intending to reclaim all the sludges. The product contained 10 percent zinc, 2

- 3 percent lead, along with levels of copper, cadmium, and chrome. Potential sources of contamination (ponds with insufficient freeboard, K061 waste pile without wind controls) were observed after the effective date of RCRA. Sources of Information: EPA Region 9. “Documentation of Determination: Liquid Chemical.” 5 February 1999. 17 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

35 http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/0/22acf29f5bba333688256acc00752419/$FILE/Li quid%20Chemical%20465%20EI%2000.pdf EPA Region 9. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Offic e of Solid Waste)

. 22 November 2005. USEPA. “Liquid Chemical Corp.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 24 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=090 0394 USEPA. “Liquid Chemical Corp.” RCRAInfo

. 6 June 2006

. 10 October 2006. USEPA. “Mineral King Minerals, Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110020489719 USEPA. “RCRA Cleanup Reforms Success Stories: Liquid Chemical Corporation

– Rapid Site Characterization and Contaminant Reduction.” 11 October 2001. 17 January 2 006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/0/CF60DA596A96ACBD88256ED100569379?O penDocument USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator Forms Addendum: Liquid Chemical Corp.” 26 March 1999. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/0/22acf 29f5bba333688256acc00752419/$FILE/Li quid%20Chemical%20465%20+%2000.pdf Additional Contacts : Jere Johnsone (Site Assessment Manager) , (415) 972

- 3094 Matt Mitguard (Site Assessment Manager) , (415) 972

- 3096 Barry Cofer (RCRA inspector) , 415

- 972

- 3303Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

36 Site Information Site Name: Lorentz Barrel & Drum Co. EPA ID No.: CAD029295706 Address: 1515 S 10 th St., San Jose, CA 95112 County: Santa Clara NPL Site: Final: 10/04/89 In CERCLIS Database: 0901287 Site History and Description of Recycling Operatio n: Lorentz Barrel & Drum Co. recycled drums at a plant in San Jose. It began receiving barrels in 1947. Many of the drums contained residual aqueous wastes, organic solvents, acids, oxidizers, caustic residues, and oils. Between 1950 and 1978, a drain age ditch carried process wastes to a large sump in the northern corn er of property, and other pond areas existed on site. Wastes from the sump were discharged to a storm drain system. Sometime between 1968 and 1971, the discharge was diverted to a sanitary sewer; investigations indicate that this discharge occurred until 1983 or 1984. After this time, liquid wastes were reportedly evaporated, drummed, and disposed of as hazardous waste along with incinerator ash, residual liquids, and sludge. Surface runo ff was collected and recycled in a drum wash. The plant received Interim Status under Subtitle C of RCRA concurrently with the company’s filing of Part A of the permit application. This site was removed as a treatment, storage, or disposal facility because it was deemed not to engage in hazardous waste activities. The facility never properly managed the residuals from its drum

- refitting operation. Ultimately, it stored residuals in drums that it was unable to refit. B efore that, it had been known to store residuals in pits and merely drain them down the gutter . The facility was shut down in Feb 1986 and in July 1987 the owner was sentenced to 2 years in jail and fined $2.04 million. Description of Contamination : Monitored wells are contaminated with trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, 1

- 1 dichloroethylene, and tetracholoroethylene (PCE) due to the overflowing of sumps and spills. The California Department of Health Services ( CDHS ) discovered more than 300 drums contaminated by phenols, methylene chl oride, and PCBs stored on the property. In 1988, CDHS and the USEPA capped the site and removed 26,000 drums and 3,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil. Also, the site was fenced, and most of the site area was paved. In 1994, USEPA removed 1033 tons of industrial wastes, 15 tons of hazardous waste liquids, and 1200 containers including 150 drums of solvents, 23 drums of ash, and over a ton of asbestos. Groundwater cleanup remedies were selected in 1988 that included building an on

- site groundwater ex traction and a treatment system which uses an ozone/ultraviolet process for organic removal with discharge of treated water to a local creek. In early 1991, a group of potentially responsible parties completed optimization studies. In late 1992, constructi on of the system was completed, and full

- scale operation and maintenance project began. Groundwater treatment is expected to continue for 30 years.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

37 In 1993, the USEPA completed an investigation to determine the extent and type of contamination at the site . Based on the results from this investigation, the USEPA selected a remedy that includes a soil vapor extraction system to clean contaminated soil and an asphalt

concrete cap to contain soil contaminated with heavy metals. The estimated cost of this cleanup was $1,970,000. In 1996, the remaining underground conduits and contaminated sumps were removed and the contaminated soil and building debris was disposed off site. By 1998 , all remedial action construction for the site was complete. Sources of Information: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Lorentz Barrel & Drum Co.” EnviroStor database

. (n.d.) 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=43300026 USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Deci sion: Lorentz Barrel & Drum Co.” 26 August 1993. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0993094.pdf USEPA. “Five

- Year Review: Lorentz Barrel & D rum Co.” 27 September 2000. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/fiveyear/f00

- 09008.pdf USEPA. “Lorentz Barrel & Drum Co.” CERCLIS . 7 December 2005. 16 October 2006

. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0901287 USEPA. “Lorentz Barrel & Drum Co.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.) 16 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110002641954 USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Lorentz Barrel & Drum Co.” 4 October 1989. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0901287.pdf USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Lorentz Barrel & Drum Co.” 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplfs/fs0901287.pdf Additional Contacts: Shiann

- Jang Chern (RPM) Jere Johnson (SAM) , (415) 972

- 3094 Chris Weden (OSC) , (415) 972

- 3041Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

38 Site Information Site Name: Mobile Smelting EPA ID No.: CAD050096163 A ddress: United Street and Reed Road, Mojave, CA 93501 County: Kern NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Mobile Smelting began operations in 1961 doing automobile restoration. These operations ended in 1970. Beginning sometime in the 1960s, operations expanded to include aluminum and copper recovery ending in 1983, resuming in 1986, and concluding in 1992. Part of the Rosamond Cancer Cluster Investigation, the site operated sporadically throu gh 1990. The Mobile Smelting site consists of a fenced 11

- acre parcel. Copper and aluminum were recovered from insulated wire and scrap metal via an incinerator. Airborne incinerator ash is recovered in the bag house air pollution equipment. Following co llection, the ash is placed in plastic bags and then inside burlap bags which are then stored in a trailer located on

- site. The furnace/bottom ash is collected at the base of the furnace and deposited in piles outside the building. Past ash handling practices are unknown. Contamination was discovered in 1988. Description of Contamination : In March 1994, the smelter was dismantled and decontaminated. Receipts obtained from the facility operator have identified approximately 250 contributors as potential ly responsible parties (PRPs) . The first phase of the potential responsible party search consisted of verifying those PRPs identified from receipts and sending information request letters in order to obtain the source of material and further records of tran sactions. The first phase of the PRP search was completed in May 1993

. The second phase of the PRP search consisted of sending information request letters to additional contributors identified from site records and generators identified by contributors. This phase 2 PRP search report was completed in May 1994. The PRPs will conduct the site investigation and cleanup and pay past costs incurred. California Department of Toxic Substances Control ( DTSC ) cleanup and removal expenditures have exceeded $1.6 million. Soil/ash samples indicate dioxin/furan (2378 TCDD, TEF) contamination as high as 323,000 parts per billion (ppb) in the bag house ash, and 20 ppb in the ash piles outside the building. Also detected in the bag house ash was cadmium as high as 84 0 ppm, copper at 120,000 ppm, and lead at 64,000 ppm. A polymer coating sprayed on the contaminated ash and soil was completed in November 1990. In March 1993, ash material contaminated with heavy metals and dioxins was removed from outside the southern boundary of the site. Residents in a near

- by apartment complex may be subject to exposure via wind or direct contact with contaminated ash or soil. The California Department of Health Services ( DHS ) obtained a court

- approved stipulation agreement for the purpose of obtaining access to the site and preventing future operation of the onsite incineration. In 1998 , a polymer sealant was applied to site soils and ash piles to eliminate the potential off

- site movement of dust and containedAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

39 runoff. DTSC conducted further sampling in August of 2001. There is no known groundwater contamination on site. In 2000 , DTSC entered into a settlement with Herman Berkovics for $75,000. The settlement included $50,000 in insurance proceeds and $25,000 from Mr. Berkovics. DTSC settled with Mr. Berkovics after reviewing his financial status and determining that he had insufficient funds to contribute more than the settlement amount for site cleanup. Sources of Information: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Mobile Smelting.” EnviroStor database (n.d.) 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=15330011 California Department of Toxic Substances Control

– Work Notice. “DTSC to Resume Sampling Around Mob ile Smelting, United Street and Reed Avenue.” August 2001. 17 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Projects/upload/MobileSmelting_fs_WorkNotice_08 01.pdf USEPA. “Mobile Smelting.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 16 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110 008262030 Additional Contacts: Ruben Medina (Project Manager) , (559) 297

- 3908, rmedina@dtsc.ca.gov Nathan Schumacher (Public Participation Specialist) , (916) 255

- 3650, nschumac@dtsc.ca.gov Ron Baker (Media Contact) , (916) 324

- 3142Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

40 Site Information Site Name: Myers Drum EPA ID No.: CAD009123217 Address: 6549 San Pablo Ave, Oakland, CA 94608 County: Alameda NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This facility operated as a drum recycling facility from 1939 through 1991. As late as 1989, 20,000 drums were stored in the yard awaiting reconditioning, 95 percent on their sides. Ninety

- nine percent of all drums accepted at the facility for reconditioning previously held hazardous materials. The facility exhibited evidence of very poor housekeeping including spillage, sump overflow, and structural failure of underground sumps and pipelines . This resulted in massive releases of mobile hazardous compounds under the facility. Potential/confirmed hazardous waste include adhesives, alkaline and aqueous solutions with metals, arsenic, baghouse waste, contaminated soil, halogenated organic compounds, hydrocarbon and oxygenated solvents, lead, metal dust and machining waste, metal sludge, off specific ation, aged, or surplus inorganics and inorganics, organic liquids with metals, organic solids with halogens, pesticide containers, solids or sludges w/ halogenated organic compounds, unspecified alkaline solutions, unspecified organic liquid mixtures, other sludge waste, waste oil , and mixed oil. Description of Contamination : This site is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs ) in soil and groundwater and heavy metals in soil. In 1989 , a completed preliminary assessment indicated that soils at the site were contaminated with metals (lead, zinc, and arsenic), volatile organic compounds (toluene, xylene, and propanol), semi

- volatile organic compounds (naphthalene and phenol), and total petroleum hydrocarbons. Two localized groundwater plume s were identified. Clay soil was added in 1999 to minimize vapor releases, residential development proposed in 2003. Sources of Information: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Myers Drum.” EnviroStor database

. (n.d. )

. 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=01340111 EPA Region 9. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 22 November 2006. USEPA. “Myers Drum.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 16 October 2006

. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110002635131 Additional Contacts: Ted Park (PM) , (510) 540

- 3805, tpark@dtsc.ca.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

41 Site Informati on Site Name: Omega Chemical Corporation EPA ID No.: CAD042245001 Address: 12504 and 12512 E. Whittier Boulevard, Whittier, CA 90602 County: Los Angeles NPL Site: Final: 1/19/99 In CERCLIS Database: 0903349 Site History and Description of Recycli ng Operation: The Omega Chemical Corporation operated as a spent solvent and refrigerant recycling and treatment facility. During its years of operation from 1976 until 1991, drums and bulk loads of waste solvent and chemicals from various industrial acti vities were processed to form commercial products. Chemical, thermal , and physical treatment processes are believed to have been used to recycle and reuse the waste materials. This facility did not report itself as a recycler on RCRA notification forms. In 1995, following four years of effort by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to clean up the facility, the site owner pleaded guilty to two felony counts of illegal storage and disposal of hazardous waste. This site was not RC RA permitted. Description of Contamination : High concentrations of tetrachloroethene (PCE ) , trichloroethene ( TCE ) , and other chlorinated hydrocarbons were found in subsurface soil and groundwater. During 1995, USEPA ’s Superfund Emergency Response Offic e oversaw removal activities, during which several thousand drums of hazardous wastes were removed from the property. In 1996, the p otentially responsible p arty (PRP), with USEPA oversight, undertook the collection and analyses of some preliminary subsurface soil and groundwater samples at the Omega Property and surrounding locations. Analytical results indicated that subsurface soil at the Omega Property is contaminated with chlorinated solvents, primarily PCE, TCE, other chlorinated hydrocarbons, freons , and metals. PCE contamination was detected in soil at concentrations ranging from 1.9 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 510 mg/kg. Groundwater samples collected at the Omega Property contained PCE up to 86,000 micrograms per liter as well as significant concentrations of other chlorinated hydrocarbons and Freon. [Note: The federal drinking water standard for PCE is 5 micrograms per liter.] The presence of PCE and TCE was also detected in groundwater at locations approximately 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 mil e down

- gradient of the Omega Property in the City of Santa Fe Springs. The cleanup expenditure at this site as of September 2004 was $5,510,784.78 . In August 2005, the federal government proposed plans to remediate groundwater contamination from the si te. USEPA has already removed some 2,700 drums of hazardous chemicals and contaminated soil from the site.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

42 Sources of Information: EPA Region 9. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 22 November 2005. USEPA. Integrated Finan cial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 16 January 2006. USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Omega Chemical Corporation.” 19 January 1999. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0903349.pdf USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Omega Chemical Corporation.” (n.d.) 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplfs/fs0903349.pdf USEPA. “Omega Chemical Corporation.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 24 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0903349 USEPA. “Omega Chemical Corporation.” RCRAInfo . 27 June 2002. 18 January 2006. USEPA. “Omega Chemical Site PRP Org GP.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.go v/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000609510 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Omega Chemical Site PRP Organized Group.” 6 June 2006. 16 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=CAD 042245001
Waste News

– Headline News. "EPA proposes cleanup plan for Calif. Chemical recycling plant." 11 August 2005. 17 January 2006. http://www.wastenews.com/headlines2.html?i d=1123786480 Additional Contacts: Jere Johnson (SAM) , (415) 972

- 3094 Christopher Lichens (RPM) , (415) 972

- 3149 Matt Mitguard (SAM) , (415) 972

- 3096 Dawn Richmond (SAM) , (415) 972

- 3097Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

43 Site Information Site Name: Quicksilver Products, Inc. EPA ID No.: C AD981424732 Address: 200 Valley Dr Ste 1, Brisbane, CA 94005 County: San Mateo NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Quicksilver Products, Inc. operated a mercury recycling facility, including fluorescent/mercury lamps and mercury

- contaminated debris, from 1988 to 1995. Their lamps were crushed outside in a unit mounted on top of a 55 gallon drum. An air separation system was used to remove the phosphor powder and mercury from the glass. The faci lity was closed down for violations of safe operating practices. In 1999, the San Mateo County D istrict Attorney‘s Office held a hearing on Mr. Ritchie Vaughn, former owner/operator of the Quicksilver Products, regarding his probation violation stemming from his failure to initiate facility closure following his hazardous waste facility permit revocation. Mr. Vaughn admitted his violation, was placed back on probation by the Court, and was given an additional probation condition of 300 hours of public service work, which must be environmentally related. Quicksilver received a Part B RCRA permit on August 7, 1989; however, it expired. Description of Contamination : Extensive contamination was found arou nd the facility. High concentrations of mercury were measured in the soil, rinse water, and on a nearby roof. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control ( DTSC ) conducted an investigation and cleanup of the site and is now seeking recovery of its costs. In 1999, DTSC identified Berkeley Lab a s one of the parties potentially responsible for these costs because it once sent fluorescent/mercury lamps and mercury

- contaminated debris to the Quicksilver site. Berkeley Lab and other potentially responsible parties are negotiating allocation of the cl eanup costs with DTSC. Sources of Information: Berkeley Lab. “Environmental Program Summary 3: Environmental Restoration (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Program).” 17 January 2006. http://www.lbl.gov/ehs/esg/00ser/00serchp3.html California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Quicksilver Products, Inc.” EnviroStor d atabas e . (n.d.). 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=41280138Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

44 Emissions Standards Division prepared by EC/R Incorporated. “EPA Evaluation of Mercury Emissions from Fluorescent Lamp Crushing. February 1994. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/catc/dir1/mercury.doc EPA Region 9. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 22 November 2005. USEPA. “Quicksilver Products, Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000610027 USEPA. “Quicksilver Product s, Inc.” RCRAInfo

. 6 June 2006

. 16 October 2006. Additional Contacts: Ritchey Vaughn (Public) , (415) 468

- 2000Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

45 Site Information Site Name: Rho Chem Corp. EPA ID No.: CAD008364432 Address: 425 Isis Ave, Inglewood CA 90301 County: Los Angeles NPL S ite: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The Rho

- Chem facility is a solvent recycling facility on a 1

- acre parcel. The facility is currently owned and operated by Philip Environmental Incorporated. Rho Chem’s RCRA Part B permit was issued on December 30, 1983. After expiration it then became effective again in May 1991; however, it has since expired. Description of Contamination : This facility has significant contaminants in groundwater and soil. Chlorinated solvents include trichloroethylene (TCE) (140 ppm) in groundwater, and tetrachloroethylene (PCE) (3600 micrograms/kg) in soil. Methyl ethyl ketone (4,000 micrograms/kg) is also found in soil. A soil

- vapor survey, soil

- vapor extraction system, an d underground storage tanks (UST) removals were planned in 1999. Off

- site groundwater contamination is known. An additional RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) w ork plan phase began in 1999 to identify the extent of groundwater contamination off site. Given the high concentrations of contaminants, indoor air is likely to be a potential issue. In 1999, future steps were projected to include interim measures to pump and treat groundwater on site and soil vapor extraction (SVE) to address soil

- vapor concerns, which therefore assist in containing the groundwater pollution. Sources of Information : California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Rho

- Chem Corporation.” EnviroStor database . (n.d.) 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/publi c/profile_report.asp?global_id=19290198 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Docket HWCA 20030194. Consent Order. Health and Safety Code Section 25187.” July 2003. 17 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/HazardousWaste/Projects/upload/RhoChem_2003_ENF_CO.pdf USEPA. “Documentation of Determination: Rho Chem Corp.” 5 February 1999. 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000475030 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Addendum: Rho Chem Corp.” 2 May 1999. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/allfacilities/73CFD83200BBED3488256ACC007 AE660?OpenDocumentAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

46 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Rho

- Chem Corp.” (n.d.) 16 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=CAD008364432 USEPA. “Rho Chem Corp.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000475030 USEPA. “Rho Chem Corp.” RCRAInfo. 6 June 2006 . 18 January 2006. Additional Contacts : Liang Chiang , (818) 551

- 2964 lchiang@dtsc .ca.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

47 Site Information Site Name: Safety

- Kleen, Inc., El Monte EPA ID No.: CAT00613893 Address: 10625 Hickson St. Unit A, El Monte CA 91731 County: Los Angeles NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : This facility is a branch of Safety

Kleen’s chemical distribution/recycling. Used chemicals, including mineral spirits, spent immersion cleaners, dry cleaning wastes, lacquer thinner wastes , and spent antifreeze are collected from customers and stored at the facility while awaiting shipment to recycling centers. California’s Department of Toxic Substances Control manages the soils on the property. There have been eight inspections in the past three years, and the last inspection was conducted in April 2005

. The facility has had nine quarters in alleged non

- compliance in past 3 years, and there are current alleged significant violations. There have been five informal and one formal enforcement action in past three years. This was a RCRA Correctiv e Action site. Description of Contamination : Contaminated soil was removed from solid waste management units ( SWMUs ) and regulated units. In the past, there were groundwater releases at the site, but as of 2000, there were no detections of groundwater co ntaminants above maximum contaminant levels (MCLs ) at the facility. It is likely that contamination occurred post

- RCRA, but it is unclear when contamination actually occurred. Cost of cleanup is unknown. Sources of Information EPA Region 9 “RCRA Corre ctive Action Environmental Indicator Forms Addendum: Safety Kleen El Monte.” 15 May 2000. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/92e28fb9e2f1a35a88256a72006760cb/d766525a9 715718288256acc007cd0eb/$FILE/Safety%20Kleen%20El%20Monte%20893%20+%20 00.pdf Senga, Robert. (Project Manager, DTSC Cypress) (714) 484

- 5436, Interview

. 7 November 2005

. USEPA. “Enforcement & Compliance History Online: Safety Kleen.” 9 December 2005. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/cgi

- bin/get1cRepo rt.cgi?tool=echo&IDNumber=110000621391 USEPA. “ RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile: Safety Kleen, Inc. El Monte.” 6 June 2006. 16 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=CAT000613893Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

48 USEPA. “Safety Kleen Systems Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000621391 Additi onal Contacts : Robert Senga (Project Manager, DTSC Cypress) , (714) 484

- 5436 rsenga@dtsc.ca.gov Aaron Yue, (714) 484

- 5439 Sara Brothers (Facility Contact) , (503) 341

- 3866Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

49 Site Information Site Name: Safety

- Kleen Corporation, Reedley Recycling Center EPA ID No.: CAD093459485 Address: 1000 S. I St., Reedley, CA 93654 County: Fresno NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : This i s a solvent recycling facility that recycles both halogenated and corrosive solvents. It received a settlement agreement with California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC ) in 2001 and a corrective action consent agreement in 2004. The facility has been in operation since 1972. There have been three inspections in the past three years; last inspection 10/6/2003. Two quarters in alleged non

- compliance in past three years. No alleged current significant violations. Two informal enforc ement actions were done in the past three years. In 2001, DTSC announced that it had reached a settlement agreement with Safety

- Kleen Systems, Inc., which included $38,500 in penalties, for hazardous waste violations at its facility. The facility was c ited by DTSC investigators for the following violations:

• Failure to properly analyze the hazardous waste generated by the activated carbon filtration system prior to shipping it to the company’s Buttonwillow facility for treatment and disposal in August o f 1998. A roll

- off bin containing this hazardous waste caught fire shortly after it was received at the Safety

- Kleen Buttonwillow facility.

• Installation of a different, and larger, activated carbon filtration system on the thermal cooker before receiving approval from DTSC for a permit modification the company submitted in October 1999. A thermal cooker solidifies waste material coming from the treatment tank prior to disposal. The application for the permit modification was subsequently approved by DTSC i n December 1999.

• Installation and use of an activated carbon filtration system on the thermal cooker without prior authorization from DTSC in 1998.

• Failure to give DTSC advance notice of the company’s planned installation of an activated carbon filtratio n system on a thermal cooker in 1998. The contamination was discovered in 1989 when the facility was required to remove all tanks. The facility had a RCRA Part B permit, which was issued and re

- issued on the following dates: 9/11/1984, 9/11/1989, 6/30/19 93, and 12/11/1998. Description of Contamination : The facility’s soil, subsurface soil, and groundwater are known to be contaminated. The main contaminant at the site is methylene chloride. Methylene chlorideAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

50 has been detected in groundwater at level s as high as thousands of ppm. However, soil venting may have reduced these concentrations. Previous monitoring data indicate that the following compounds have been detected above maximum contaminant levels (MCLs): benzene; 1,1

- dichloroethane (DCA); tetrachloroethylene (PCE); 1,1

- dichloroethylene (DCE). Also, methylene chloride has been detected at elevated concentrations (thousands of ppm) in the past, and may have been reduced in part by soil venting. In over eight years of monitoring, there has been no evidence of off

- site contamination (as of 2000). Approximately $2.5 million has been spent for cleanup over the past few years at this site. Sources of Information California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Department Reaches Agreement wi th Safety

- Kleen.” 21 November 2001. 17 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/PressRoom/upload/NEWS_2001_Safety

- Kleen.pdf California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Docket HWCA: P1

- 03/04

- 004: Corrective Action Consent Agreement.” February 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/HazardousWaste/Projects/upload/S K

- Reedley_ENF_CACA.pdf California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Safety Kleen Corporation.” EnviroStor database . (n.d.) 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=10280019 EPA Region 9. “RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator Forms: Safety Kleen Reedl e y Recycling Center.” 3 April 2000. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/92e28fb9e2f1a35a88256a72006760cb/d057b34d7 5f2c00f88256acc007d11c4/$FILE/Safety%20Kleen%20Reedley%20485%20+%2000. pdf USEPA. “Enforcement & Compliance History Online: Safety Kl een Reedley Incorporated.” 9 December 2005. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/cgi

- bin/get1cReport.cgi?tool=echo&IDNumber=110000482102 USEPA. “RCRA Correc tive Action Site Progress Profile for Safety Kleen System, Inc.” 6 June 2006. 16 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=CAD 093459485 USEPA. “Safety Kleen Reedl e y Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000482102 USEPA. “Safety Kleen Reedl e y Incorporated.” RCRAInfo . 7 November 2002. 18 January 2006. Vakili, Farshad (D TSC Sacramento), (916) 255

- 3612, Interview . 28 October 2005.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

51 Additional Contacts: Ninon Stamoulis , (559) 643

- 2105 F arshad Vakili (DTSC Sacramento) , (916) 255

- 3612, fvakili@dtsc.ca.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

52 Site Information Site Name: Safety

- Kleen Corporation, Rohnert Park EPA ID No.: CAT000613943 Address: 5750 Commerce Boulevard, Rohnert Park CA 94928 County: Sonoma NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Safety Kleen operated a proprietary solvent distribution and recycling service. A Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) (#99

- 56) is in effe ct for this facility. The facility is still in operation. It received a RCRA permit in September 1994 . The permit expired in October 2004. Description of Contamination : The facility had two underground storage tanks (USTs), 1,000 gallons each , that l eaked mineral spirits, perchloroethylene (PCE), and tri

- chloroethylene (TCE). The most recent ground water monitoring report indicates the presence of TCE (4 ppb), PCE (24 ppb), cis

- 1,2

- di

- chloroethylene (DCE) (16 ppb) 1, 4

- dichlorobenzene, and 1,1

- DCE (6 ppb). Vinyl chloride in shallow ground water beneath the facility has declined from a maximum of over 500 ppb in 1997 to non

- detection as of an April 2000 sampling . The plume does not extend off site. Soils on and off site were contaminated with various s olvents. A soil vapor extraction (SVE) system began operation in July, 1993. The SVE system was shut down in July, 1996, with RWQCB approval because the removal rate of the system had declined. Both tanks and soil were removed in August 1991. Contaminatio n was not removed beneath buildings because of concerns relating to structural stability. The entire facility is paved and there are no deed restrictions against digging or using the shallow ground water at the present time. The project manager feels that the residual contamination in subsurface soil is probably fairly low; however, there is no data to confirm this opinion. Soil gas investigations have been conducted. Some contamination did occur after RCRA was in place including a surface spill resulting from a drum leak. The site had California state permits. Sources of Information: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Safety

- Kleen.” EnviroStor database

. (n.d.) 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=49280011 EPA Region 9. “Documentation of Environmental Indicator Determination: Safety Kleen Rohnert Park.” 5 February 2002. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/92e28fb9e2f1a35a88256a72006760cb/c2644a773 c83 ec4c88256acc007c3c95/$FILE/Safety_Kleen_(Rohnert_Park)_943_EI_00.PDF EPA Region 9. “RCRA Corrective Action Environmental Indicator Forms Addendum: Safety Kleen Rohnert Park.” 9 November 2000. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/92e28fb9e2f1a35a88256a72006760cb/c2644a773Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

53 c83ec4c88256acc007c3c95/$FILE/Safety%20Kleen%20(Rohnert%20Park)%20943%20 +%2000.pdf Rolandelli, Bonnie (CA SWRCB) , (707) 576

- 2667, Interview

. 22 November 2005. USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Safety Kleen Systems, Inc.” 6 June 2006. 16 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=CAT000613943 USEPA. “Safety Kleen Rohnert Park.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000621408 USEPA. “Safety Kleen Rohnert Park.” RCRAInfo. 6 June 2006

. 16 October 2006. Additional C ontacts: Bonnie Rolandelli , (707) 576

- 2667 rolab@rbl.swrcb.ca.gov Sharon Halper (Family Contact) , (707) 748

- 7507Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

54 Site Information Site Name: Safety

- Kleen (San Jose Facility) (aka Clean Harbors San Jose LLC) EPA ID No.: CAD059494310 Address: 1021 Berryessa Road, San Jose, CA 95112 County: Santa Clara NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Safety Kleen (aka Solvent Services, aka Laidlaw) operates a storage, treatment, and recycling facility for waste chemicals. The site occupies approximately three acres in a predominantly commercial/industrial area of San Jose. The facility began operations in 1974 under the name Solvent Services Company, Inc

. Operations at that time did not include the waste water treatment system which now exists at the facility. The CA Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) issued a permit for storage and treatment of hazardous waste to the facility in 1990. Solv ent Services was acquired by Laidlaw Environmental Services on December 31, 1994 and Solvent Services changed its name to Laidlaw Environmental Services in May 1997. In July 1998, the facility changed its name from Laidlaw Environmental Services (San Jose ), Inc. to Safety

- Kleen (San Jose), Inc. On September 7, 2002, the Safety Kleen site became a Clean Harbors Site. An inspection in April 2000 resulted in the facility being cited for several alleged violations, including labeling discrepancies, container management problems, and record keeping discrepancies. This site h ad an active Part B permit, first received in October 1983 and later re

- issued in November 1989 after it expired. Description of Contamination : Historically, the site was heavily c ontaminated. The contamination was discovered in the early 1980s and it is likely that some contamination may have occurred after 1982. A substantial portion of it occurred in the 1970s. Soils at the site are contaminated with various VOCs. The site is entirely covered with either asphalt or concrete. A full

- scale steam injection and vacuum extraction system was installed and began operating in 1989. This was later converted to a dual

- phase extraction system. Approximately 71,000 VOCs were removed between 1989 and 2001. In 1992, prior to major modification s and remodeling, the facility release d hazardous to the air as a result of an uncontrolled chemical reaction, which occurred during the blending of wastes within a tanker truck at the facility. Thi s accident occurred prior to the installation of new tanks at the facility. Cleanup is ongoing and it is difficult to determine the costs , as ownership has transferred numerous times over the course of clean up. Sources of Information: California Dep artment of Toxic Substances Control. “Draft Hazardous Waste Facility Permit: Safety Kleen: San Jose.” January 2002. 17 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

55 http://www.dtsc.ca .gov/HazardousWaste/Projects/upload/Safety

Kleen_FS_CEQA_NegDec.pdf California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Solvent Services, Inc.” EnviroStor database . (n.d.) 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=43290007 EPA Region 9. “Documentation of Environmental Indicator Determination: Safety Kleen San Jose.” 5 February 1999. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/0/228281032035d08788256acc007cb2c6/$FILE/ Safety_Kleen_(San_Jose)_310_EI_00.pdf
EPA Region 9. “RCRA Corrective Action Forms Addendum: Safety Kleen San Jose.” 27 September 2000. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/0/228281032035d08788256acc007cb2c6/$FILE/ Safety%20Kleen%20(San%20Jose)%20310%20+%2000.pdf Smith, Marty (Remediation Group) , (417) 358

- 0826, Interview . 28 October 2005

. USEPA. “Clean Harbors San Jose.” Envirof acts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000484743 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Pro gress Profile for Clean Harbors San Jose LLC.” 6 June 2006. 16 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=CAD059494310 USEPA. “Safety Kleen San Jose.” RCRAInfo . 27 June 2002. 18 January 2006. Additional Contacts: Marty Smith (Remediation Group) , (417) 358

- 0826 Andrew Bernahicks (Project Officer at CADTSC) , (510) 540

- 3956 Vince Christian , (510) 622

- 2336Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

56 Site Information : Site Name: Sierra Battery Sales EPA ID No.: CAD983650128 Address: 977 Lochbrae Rd (930 Del Paso Blvd) , Sacramento, CA 95815 County: Sacramento NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0904607 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Sierra Battery Sales has been in operation since 1963. The facility bought and sold used automobile batteries and stored non

sellable batteries in the alley prior to shipment off

- site for recycling. State funds have been allocated to excavate and remove the c ontaminated soil on site. In 1995, task orders were being prepared to encumber the money for the removal action. In 1996 , a removal action was performed which consisted of the excavation and disposal of approximately 477 cubic yards of lead

- contaminated soils. DTSC settled its cost recovery action with the defendants when the Settlement Agreement and Consent Decree was filed in the U.S. District Court on November 23, 1999. Description of Contamination : Historical activities at this site included the burial of battery parts underground in two locations in the alley. In 1988 , California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Surveillance and Enforcement responded to a complaint alleging the improper handling of batteries. One

- hundred

- twenty cracked batteries were observed. Soil samples collected on

- site indicated hazardous waste levels of lead as high as 8,920 mg/kg. The operator's private residence and a mobile home park, both adjacent to site, displayed lead contamination. Sources of Information : California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Sierra Battery Sales.” EnviroStor d atabase. (n.d.). 16 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.go v/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=34360054 EPA Region 9. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste) 22 November 2005. USEPA. “Sierra Battery Sales.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 24 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0904607 USEPA. “Sierra Battery Sales.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009268915Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

57 Site Information Site Name: United Metal Recovery EPA ID No.: Address: 12403 United Street, Mojave, CA 93501 County: Kern NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This 8

- acre site was a copper recovery operation consisting of a house trailer, warehouse, and furnace inside an aluminum shed . The facility operated from 1963 to 1988 under various owners and operators. The United Metal Recovery operation purchased copper wire from different scrap dealers and burned off the insulation in a furnace. The site contains several piles of old wire, oil well flanges, glass and aluminum, and used automobile batteries. In 1989 California Department of Toxic Substances Control ( DTSC ) issued an Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Determination to the site owner and started cleanup actions , which included stabilization of the site and the development of a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study. Dioxins were reportedly measured at over 75 ppb. DTSC reached a cost recovery settlement with two former owner/operators and obtained a judgment from the federal court against a third former owner/operator for all past and future costs. Description of Contamination : In 1988, the metal recovery business was identified by Kern County Health. At this time , high concentrations of dioxins, furans, copper, lead, zinc, and low concentrations of p olynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, were found in the onsite soils and ash pil es. In 2004, DTSC announced that "(h)azardous waste at the site was cleaned to an industrial health

- based cleanup level and the site can now be developed for industrial/commercial purposes." It is unclear when the contamination occurred. Cleanup costs are estimated at $300,000.00 Sources of Information: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Department Certifies Cleanup of United Metal Recovery.” 5 No vember 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/PressRoom/upload/NEWS_2004_T

- 70

- 04.pdf California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “United Metal Recovery.” EnviroStor d atabase

. (n.d

. ) 18 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=15330007 Domingo, Danny California Department of Toxic Substances Control (Project Manager), Email

. 8 December 2005

. EPA Region 9. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 22 November 2005.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

58 Additional Contacts: Danny Domingo (Project Manager) , (559) 297

- 3932, ddomingo@dtsc.ca.go vAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling California

59 Site Information: Site Name: Victor Industrial Battery EPA ID No.: Address: 138 N. San Fernando Rd, Los Angeles, CA 90031 County: Los Angeles NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The site w as previously a battery recycler whose owner, Victor Pena, was under investigation by Los Angeles County and the LA City Attorney's Office for the illegal discharge of hazardous waste onto the subject property. The waste materials were being discharged into an unlined pit in the rear of the property and the driveway. The responsible party was subsequently convicted of illegal discharge of hazardous waste, sentenced , and ordered to remediate the site. Description of Contamination : In 1994, it was found that the maximum concentration of lead in the soil was 30,000 mg/kg and minimum pH was 0.48. Groundwater contamination is suspected. Sources of Information: California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Victor Industrial Battery.” EnviroStor d atabas e . (n.d.) 18 October 2006. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/profile_report.asp?global_id=19360528 Additional Contacts: Johnson Abraham (PM), (714) 484

- 5476, jabraham@dtsc.ca.govAppendix A

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Colorado

60 Site Information : Site Name: CoZinCo EPA ID No.: COD094154671 Address: 100 W. Zinc Street, Salida, CO 81201 County: Chaffee NPL Site: Part of Smeltertown Site; Proposed: February 7, 1992 In CERCLIS Database: 0800167 Description of Recycling Operation : CoZinCo has processed zinc sulfate and smelter slag since 1977 . CoZinCo manufactures zinc sulfate soil amendment/animal feed by treating metallic galvanizing wastes called "skimmings" with 94 percent sulfuric acid. Areas of contamination include sev eral drum piles, two ponds used to hold spent processing water, a pile consisting of sludge scraped from the ponds, and an area where sludge was worked into the soil. This facility contaminated the eastern portion of the Smeltertown site . The Smeltertown site covers approximately 100 acres in a rural area near Salida, Choffee County, Colorado. It consists of areas involving operations of Koppers, Inc., CoZinCo, Inc., and a smelter. CoZinCo did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : According to a 1987 EPA report, s oil on the property contains elevated levels of heavy metals, including chromium, lead, z inc, antimony, nickel, and lead

. Contaminants were found in three drum storage areas. Sources of Information: Agency for Toxic Substance & Disease Registry. “Public Health Assessment: CoZinCo.” (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/smeltertown/smel_p1.html Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. “Smeltertown Site.” Hazardous Waste Materials and Management Division . (n.d.) 18 October 2006. http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/hm/rpsmelter.htm#summary USEPA. “C oZinCo.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 17 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0800167 USEPA. “CoZinCo.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000467922 USEPA. “CoZinCo.” RCRAInfo. 13 October 2000. 18 January 2006. USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: CoZinCo.” 4 June 1998. 17 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/superrods/index.cfm?fuseaction=data.siterods&siteid=0801085 USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Smeltertown.” March 2003. 17 January 2005. http://www.epa.gov/region8/superfund/sites/co/smeltown.htmlAppendix A

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Colorado

61 USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Smeltertown.” 7 February 1992. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0801085.pdf USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for CoZinCo.” 6 June 2006. 18 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=COD094154671 USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Smeltertown Site.” 12 October 200 6. 18 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0801085 Additional Contacts : Martin O'Grady (State Project Manager) , 303

- 692

- 3300, 888

- 569

- 1831 toll

- free Stan Christensen (EPA Remedial Project Manager) , 303

- 312

- 6694 Sabri na Forrest, (SAM) , (303) 312

- 6484 Pat Smith (SAM) Martin O’Grady , (303

- 312

- 6638) Walter Avramenko , 303

- 692

- 3300Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Connecticut

62 Site Information Site Name: National Oil Services EPA ID No.: CTD162235782 Address: 16 Elm Street, West Haven, CT 06516

- 3806 County: New Haven NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: National Oil Services Inc. operated as a former waste oil storage, treatment, transfer, recycling , and disposal facility from 1982 to 1997 , at which time it was abandoned. In 1997, after a number of years of attempting to bring the company into compliance, the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection ordered operations to cease. The property owner evicted National Oil Services and its subs idiary business, Atlantic Environmental Laboratory. Prior to vacating, National Oil Services filed for bankruptcy. Description of Contamination : A 1997 investigation found methylene chloride and other halogenated solvents in waste oils, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, chromic acid, sodium hydroxide , and ether at the site. Contaminated wastewater, sludge, debris, drums, and waste oil have been removed from the site. EPA spent approximately $1. 6 million to clean up the site. In 2001, EPA s ettled with 750 businesses, municipalities , and government agencies who sent waste oil to National Oil Services. Ninety three percent of the parties involved in the settlement are being asked to pay no more than $3,000. EPA intends on paying $275,000 of the cleanup costs to cover those companies that sent waste oil to the site and are either insolvent or defunct. Sources of Information: Bazenas, Ted (OSC) , (617) 918

- 1230, Interview. 7 December 200 5

. USEPA. “National Oil Services.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110003019126 USEPA. “Waste Site Cleanup & Reuse in New England: N ational Oil Services.” 15 July 2002. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/R1/npl_pad.nsf/51dc4f173ceef51d85256adf004c7ec8/bdd036037 1edebab85256b4200603554?OpenDocument#top USEPA

– EPA New England Press Release. “EPA Lodges Consent Decree for National Oil Services Site in CT.” 18 September 2001. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/ne/pr/2001/sep/010908.html Additional Contacts: Ted Bazenas (OSC) (617) 918

- 1230 bazenas.edward@epa.gov Gerardo Millan

- Ramos (SAM) 918

- 1377 Alice Kaufman 617

- 918

- 1064Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recy cling Connecticut

63 Site Information Site Name: Zollo Drum Company EPA ID No.: CTD075394254 Address: 100 Railroad Ave, Beacon Falls, CT 06403 County: New Haven NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0100184 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Zollo Drum Company is a 0.75

- acre site that consists of a drum storage area and a gravel parking area. Ownership and operational activities at this site prior to 1964 are unknown. From 1964 to 1990, a small drum reclamation facility operated on the property under various owners and operators. Operations on the property have included the storage of solvents and was te oils in two 20,000

- gallon underground storage tank s located on the adjacent southern property, and the transportation and storage of waste oils and chemical wastes, including industrial sludges and wastewater. Hazardous wastes that have been disposed of, used, or stored on the property include metal sludges, oily wastes, halogenated and nonhalogenated solvents, lacquer thinner, acids, paints, pigments, dyes, inks, rubber solvents, fly ash , pickling liqu ors, and laboratory and pharmaceutical wastes. In 1977, a fire occurred in an on

- site warehouse; it is unknown whether drum contents were released during the fire. In 1984, the transportation of hazardous waste for disposal ceased, and site activities until 1990 consisted of the collection of empty drums for reclamation. This site has been deferred to the C onnecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP ) . It is difficult to determine the exact time of site contamination. It is unclear if the site was abandoned. Zollo Drum Company did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : Analytical results of soil samples collected in 1989 from the property and the adjacent southern property indicated the presence of volatile organic compoun ds (VOCs ) , including tetrachloroethylen e and trichloroethane; inorganic elements, including lead, arsenic, chromium, and zinc; semivolatile organic compounds ( SVOCs ) ; and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs )

. Sources of Information : Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. “List of Contaminate d or Potentially Contaminated Sites.” p . 14. 20 September 2006. 18 October 2006. http://vvv.dep.state.ct.us/wst/remediation/sites/sites_a

- f.pdf Hatzopoulos, Tom ( On

- scene Coordinator) Interview. 8 December 2005

. USEPA. “National Oil Services.” RCRAInfo. 1 September 2000. 18 January 2006. USEPA. “Waste Site Cleanup & Reuse in New England: Zollo Drum Company.” 15 July 2002. 17 July 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recy cling Connecticut

64 http://yosemite.epa.gov/r1/npl_pad.nsf/0/78b5b20e7d4b468e85256b4200605353?OpenD ocument USEPA. “Zollo Drum Company.” CERCLIS . 8 December 2005. 17 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0100184
USEPA. “Zollo Drum Company.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110003018350 Additional Contacts: Richard

- A Zollo , (203) 729

- 6538 Tom Hatzopoulos (OSC) , 617

- 918

- 1284 Gerardo Millan

- Ramos (SAM) , 617

- 918

- 1377 Patricia DeRosa, 860

- 424

- 3501Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Delaware

65 Site Information Site Name: Chem

- Solv, Inc. EPA ID No.: DED98071414 Address: 176A N. Dupont Highway, Dover, DE 19901 County: Kent NPL Site: Final: 8/30/90 In CERCLIS Database: 0300124 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Chem

- So lv, Inc. distilled spent solvents at this 1.5

- acre site between 1982 and 1984. To recycle solvents, drummed wastes were heated over an electric coil heater and distilled solvents were then collected in clean drums. Distilled solvents were sold to customers, and residues from the distillation process were stored on site as RCRA

- regulated hazardous waste. Description of Contamination : An explosion and fire in 1984 destroyed the Chem

- Solv recycling facility. Witnesses saw fluids flowing out of the facility , from a concrete pad. After the fire, high concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) , mainly trichloroethene (TCE ) , were found in the Columbia aquifer beneath the site. In 1985, the state excavated and treated 1,300 cubic yards of contaminate d soil using a process that passes air through the soil to remove VOCs. This process reduced the contaminant concentrations to levels that permitted the soil to be returned to the excavated area. The state also installed a groundwater recovery system which it operated from 1985 to 1988. The extraction of contaminated groundwater reduced TCE concentrations in the Columbia aquifer beneath the site from the 200

- 300 parts per million (ppm) range to the 1 ppm range. Groundwater recovery and treatment operations began in 1997. Following the treatment of 48 million gallons of contaminated ground water, pumping was conditionally terminated based on substantial improvement in groundwater quality and the improbability of exposure to site contaminants. USEPA identifie d increasing levels of TCE in two site monitoring wells and notified the potentially responsible parties (PRPs ) of the need to resume groundwater pumping and tre atment. In addition to the pump

- and

- treat operations, the PRPs will continue to perform the required ground water monitoring at domestic, recovery , and monitoring wells until the cleanup levels are achieved. In 1995, TCE was found down

- gradient of the former Chem

- Solv facility. New, deeper wells were dug for area residents, tapping into a deeper aquifer. More than 114 million gallons of contaminated groundwater has been extracted and treated from the site. C oncentrations of TCE in the Columbia aquifer have decreased by 90 percent. Cleanup construction at this site was completed in 1998. Capital costs for cleanup were estimated between $110,000 and $23 4,000, annual O & M were estimated at $57,000 to $148,000 . The present worth was estimated between $660,000 and $686,000.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Delaware

66 Sources of Information: EPA Region 3. “Current Site Information: Chem

- Solv, Inc.” June 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/npl/DED980714141.htm EPA Region 3 Superfund Fact Sheet. “EPA Completes Construction at Chem

- Solv Superfund Site.” June 1999. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/super/sites/DED980714141/fs/1999

- 06.htm USEPA. “Chem

- Solv, Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 Janu ary 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110005989038 USEPA. “ Superfund Site Progress Profile for Chem

- Solv.” CERCLIS

. 12 October 2 006. 18 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0300124 USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Chem

- Solv, Inc.” 31 March 1992. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0392146.pdf Additional Contacts: Bonnie Gross (EPA Remedial Project Manager) , (215) 814

- 3229, gross.bonnie@epa.gov V ance Evans (Community Involvement Coordinator) , (800) 553

- 2509 or (215) 814

- 5526, evans.vance@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Delaware

67 Site Information Site Name: Diamond State Salvage EPA ID No.: DE0000122218 Address: 702 E. 14th Street, Wilmington, DE 19802 County: New Castle NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0304940 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Diamond State Salvage, situated on 4.25 acres, operated at this site from 1949 to 1992. The owner's father acquired the land from a coal and heating oil company in 1949. During this time, full

- scale salvage operations consisted of removing salvageable metals from automobiles, appliances, batteries, empty compressed gas cylinders, empty drums, and tanks. The salvage operation used torches or machinery to sectio n objects. The most common salvaged materials were aluminum, copper, iron, brass, and lead. The metals were then shipped to several scrap metal buyers. Materials which were not of value, such as rubber and plastics, were stockpiled on site. Other materials were transported to the local landfill. Extensive soil contamination occurred on the site during its operational history. During 1991 and 1992, operations at Diamond State Salvage consisted mainly of excavating the ground surface of the site to lo cate any metals with salvage value. As a result of this excavation, over half of the site is covered with piles of earth mixed with large portions of debris and trash. Weathering effects have formed deep ditches and pools along the edges of the debris pi les. Description of Contamination : The Diamond State Salvage site is a $11.9 million Superfund Removal action. The site is contaminated with lead and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs ) . This removal action will mitigate the potential public exposure to and ongoing discharge of lead and PCBs into the Christina River/Delaware Watershed. On

- site removal of oily waste will likely continue through the end of the removal action. Weather permitting, excavation to remove lead and PCB contamination in the stream bank and sediments will begin after installation o f the water diversion structure. This installation was expected by March 2000, and was expected to be completed in late spring or early summer 2000. Additionally, based on the significant amounts of PCB

- c ontaminated oil encountered on site and under the stream bank , as well as other USEPA costs, USEPA is considering a request from the On

- Scene Coordinator (OSC) for additional funding to allow completion of this removal action, to a total of approximately $ 16.7 million. Since May 1998, USEPA has secured and temporarily stabilized the site. Site buildings and structures have been demolished and removed. Soil contamination outside the former salvage yard property fence has been excavated and restored, and mos t site contamination has been excavated and properly disposed off site. Approximately 80,000 tons of contaminated soils have been excavated and disposed. Sources of Information: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. “Health Consultation: Diamond State Salvage.” 10 July 1998. 18 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/diamond/dss_toc.htmlAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Delaware

68 USEPA. “Diamond State Salvage.” CERCLIS

. 12 October 2006 . 18 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0304940 USEPA. “Diamond State Salvage.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009273641 USEPA. “Mid

- Atlantic Superfund: Diamond State Salvage.” November 2004. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/npl/DE0000122218.htm Additional Contacts: Kevin Boyd (OSC) , (215) 814

- 3418 Vance Evans (CIC) , (800) 553

- 2509, (215) 814

- 5526 Shawn Garvin (Government Relations) , (215) 814

- 299 8 Deborah Carlson (OSC) , (304) 234

- 0249 Peter Schaul, Region 3Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Delaware

69 Site Information Site Name: Standard Chlorine of Delaware EPA ID No.: DED041212473 Address: 745 Governor Lea Rd, PO 319, New Castle, DE 19720 County: New Castle NPL Site: Final: 7/22/1987 In CERCLIS Database: 0300058 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Metachem and its predeces sor, Standard Chlorine (SC), were an organic chemical manufacturer that produced a variety of polychlorobenzenes for more than 35 years. The facility operated as Standard Chlorine from 1966 to late 1998 when it was purchased by Connecticut

- based Charter Oak Capital Partners and renamed Metachem. The site was situated on 85 acres , but only 46 acres of the property was actively used to produce chemic als. Metachem and Standard Chlorine were leading global producers of a class of highly specialized family of chemicals, known as polychlorobenzenes, composed of chlorine and benzene. Standard Chlorine and Metachem's line of chemical products i ncluded, but was not limited to, monochlorobenzene (mono), paradichlorobenzene (para or pDCB for the process), orthodichlorobenzene (ortho), metadichlorobenzene (meta), trichlorobenzene (tri) , and tetrachlorobenzene (tetra) (the last of which was sold up until 1990). The facility used approximately 4 million pounds of liquid benzene per month, transported to the plant by truck and rail cars and stored in above ground storage tanks. The facility also used approximately 7 million pounds of chlorine per month delivered either as a gas through a pipeline from the nearby OxyChem chlorine plant, or as a pressurized liquid in rail cars. Other raw material s used at the facility included iron catalysts, wastewater treatment chemicals, ethylene glycol, refrigerants, lubricants , and oils purchased in drums or smaller containers and stored in the areas where they were used. The chemical production process conducted on site consisted of a series of reaction vessels and distillation columns. The reaction of chlorine with benzene or various isomers of chlorinated benzene produced a "reactor mass" consisting of mixed polychlorobenzenes and anhydrous hydrogen chloride (HCl) as a byproduct. The primary benzene reaction produced para, meta , and ortho. These three chemicals are all dichlorobenzenes and are produced in the same reaction. In addition, tri and tetra were produced in this reaction but in smaller quantities. Thus, paradichlorobenzene, Metachem's most valuable product, could not be created without also producing other chlorobe nzenes for which few buyers existed. Other processes conducted at the facility included a crystallization process for para and a dehalogenation (a.k.a. recycler/hydrogenator) system. The crystallization process involved the purification and chilling of li quid para on a Sandvik belt system to produce a crystalline or flaked para product , which is packaged in paper bags for shipment off site (a.k.a. the Flaker Process). The dehalogenation process involved the heating of tetra in the presence of a metal catalyst and hydrogen to strip chlorine and recover tri, di, and meta. Tetra is primarily produced during chlorination of benzene at the Main Plant and chlorination of para and ortho at the Tri Plant. TheAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Delaware

70 tetra is contained within the polychlorobenzene byproduct streams of these processes. This polychlorobenzene byproduct was then stored for later processing at the recycler unit. Given that Standard Chlorine maintained stockpiles of mixed polychlorobenzenes with high concentrations of tetra on site, the dehal ogenation process allowed Standard Chlorine and Metachem to convert a byproduct material that would otherwise require costly disposal as a hazardous waste into a commercially useful product. In late 1996, after proper construction and operating permits w ere secured from the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC), Standard Chlorine began operating the recycler. The recycler, though beset with problems, operated periodically until the facility

- wide shutdown in May 2002. This process, with the accompanying stockpiles of tetra

- laced polychlorobenzenes (regarded by investors as a potential "gold

- mine") , was one of the prime reasons Charter Oak purchased the Standard Chlorine assets. As part of the chemical production proces s, PCBs and dioxins were generated as a byproduct. The PCB/dioxin

containing waste stream became part of the distillation column bottoms, which were sent off site for incineration. The fact that this material was not regulated as a hazardous waste througho ut the 1990s resulted in a significant subsidy to the operations of Standard Chlorine and then Metachem, as significant management and disposal costs were not incurred. In 2001, with Metachem continuing to allow large quantities of tetra

- laced material to build up, DNREC finally took forceful action through the Stipulation of Final Judgment between Metachem and DNREC. Under that decree, the plant was obligated to recycle tetra at the rate of 3 gallons per minute, which would take 7 years. This consent de cree in effect recognized that a speculative accumulation violation had occurred, and was an attempt to reduce the accumulated stockpile in an orderly and efficient manner. In May 2002, in large part due to overwhelmingly adverse market conditions in the polychlorobenzene business, Metachem went bankrupt and the site was abruptly closed and abandoned. Metachem was guilty of a speculative accumulation violation. There was no commercially viable market for tetrachlorobenzene after 1990. Before 1990, tetra was used as an intermediate or raw material in the production of herbicides, insecticides , and defoliants. It was also used to manufacture other chemicals such as 2,4,5 trichlorophenol and 2,4,5 trichlorophenoxyacetic acid. When Metachem came into the pi cture, it apparently viewed the accumulated stockpile of tetra

laced polychlorobenzene as free feedstock, provided they could convert the waste chemical, via the hydrogenation process, to the marketable products di and tri. However, Metachem surely was aware that this potential "free feedstock" carried with it a significant risk. Without the use of the recycling system, Metachem would be required to dispose of roughly 13 million pounds of tetra as hazardous waste, at a cost of 50

- 65 cents per pound. Only a handful of facilities nationwide could have properly handled the disposal of this chemical. In the face of such risk, it is surprising that Metachem did not conduct more extensive due diligence about the efficacy of the recycling process.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Delaware

71 Before Standard Chlorine was bought by Metachem, DNREC issued 16 Notices of Violation (NOV) between January 22, 1988 and July 16, 1998. During Metachem's existence, it was issued nine Notices of Violation (NOV) by DNREC between October 26, 1999 and November 13, 2001.
This site did not hold a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : In 1987, the site was listed on the National Priorities List (NPL) of most hazardous waste sites due to a 1981 chlorobenzene spill that occurred while workers were filling a railroad tanker car on the property. An additional spill occurred in 1986: 569,000 gallons of various volatile organic compounds (VOCs) spilled after a 375,000

- gallon tank of VOCs split open, collapsed, and damaged three nearby tanks of VOCs, causing the latter tanks to partially spill. Chlorobenzenes from spilled material have been found in the groundwater, soil, sediments, and surface water. Wetlands near the site are also contaminated. Environmental assessments that occurred after the 1986 spill revealed facility l eaks into the groundwater dating back to the mid

- 1970s. The state maintains a fish consumption advisory on Red Lion Creek for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs ) and dioxin. Due to its bankruptcy, Metachem was unable to perform further cleanup, so USEPA is completing the remainder of the original cleanup under the CERCLA Emergency Removal provisions. Initially, USEPA and DNREC discovered approximately 43 million pounds of chemicals throughout the former manufacturing facility at the time of its bankruptcy in 2002. USEPA consolidated liquid chemicals from over 100 holding tanks, cleaned the empty tanks, and demolished and removed some of the tanks from the site. USEPA and DNREC have removed millions of pounds of chemicals from the site. Some of the chemi cals were products and some were wastes. This removal has generated more than $245,000 for site cleanup operations. USEPA has completed steam

- cleaning of the distillation equipment and piping, removing and any chemical residuals. Although the wastewater treatment plant operations have ended, USEPA is continuing to keep technology available until all products and wastes are removed from the site. Facility structures are being dismantled. Currently, USEPA is concentrating on removing the remaining estimated 20 million pounds of chemicals from the site. Removal activities are about 80 percent finished. To date, the remedial design (RD) for the Columbia Aquifer barrier wall and pump

- and

- treat system is 95 percent complete. Construction for the barrier wall and pump

- and

- treat system, also called the “remedial action ,” or RA, should begin this winter. While the wall is being constructed, the pump

- and

- treat system will also be installed. Potomac Aquifer well samples, collected in June 2005, found no signs of site

- related contamination. The total cost of this remedi al action is estimated to be $75 million or more. As of September 2004, cleanup expenditures at this site amounted to $20,242,784.80. US EPA has approved over $10 million for the remedial cleanup at the Standard Chlorine site. The Columbia AquiferAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Delaware

72 containment barrier wall and the pump

- and

- treat system will account for approximately $4.2 million. The chemical disposal associated with the removal action will account for about $6.26 million. As part of the Record of Decision (ROD) Amendment #1, the USEPA ’s remedial program will properly dispose of liquid chemicals that remain on

- site. Sources of Information: EPA Region 3 "EPA August 1992 RCRA Inspection Report. " 17 September 1992. 21 January 2006. http://www.dnrec.state.de.us/DNREC2000/Divisions/AWM/do/MetachemTaskForce/EP A%20Documents/EPA%20August%201992%20RCRA%20Inspection%20Report.pdf EPA Region 3 "EPA Janu ary 1999 SC Reinspection Report. " 15 January 1999. 21 January 2006. http://www.dnrec.state.de.us/DNREC2000/Divisions/AWM/do/MetachemTaskForce/EP A%20Documents/EPA%20January%201999%20SC%20Reinspection%20Report.pdf State of Delaware. "Task Force on Responsible Management of Facilities Handling Hazardous Waste Products (The Metachem Task Force). " 30 May 2003. 21 January 2006. http://www.dnrec.state.de.us/DNREC2000/library/metachemfinal.pdf USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Standard Chlorine of Delaware.” 9 March 1995. 21 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0395193.pdf USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 15 January 2006. USEPA. “MidAtlantic Superfund: Current Site Information.” September 2005. 25 January 2006. http://ep a.gov/reg3hwmd/npl/DED041212473.htm USEPA. “MidAtlantic Superfund: Standard Chlorine Inc.” September 2005. 21 January 2006. http://epa.gov/reg3hwmd/super/sites/DED041212473/ USEPA Proposed Remedial Action Plan Summary: Standard Chlorine Delaware . “EPA Seeks Public Comment on Proposed Remedial Action Plan.” April 2004. 21 January 2006. http://www.dnrec.state.de.us/DNREC2000/Divisions/AWM/do/Spring%202004%20Stan dard%20Chlorine%20PRAP%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf USEPA. “Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 21 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0300058 USEPA. “Standard Chlorine of Delaware.” RCRAInfo . 13 September 2000. 21 January 2006. USEPA. “Standard Chl orine of Delaware Site (AKA Metachem).” On

- Scene CoordinatorAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Delaware

73 Profile . (n.d.). 21 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/metachem USEPA Superfund Site Cleanup Progress Update. “Fact Sheet #15

– Standard Chlorine of Delaware (aka Metachem) Site.” September 2005. 21 January 2006. http://www.dnrec.state.de.us/DNREC2000/Divisions/AWM/do/FactSheet15.pdf Additional Contacts: Hilda Burgos, ORC Region 3 Douglas Fox (OSC) , (215) 814

- 3262 Trish Taylor (CIC) , (215) 814

- 2938 Hilary Thornton (RPM) , (215) 814

- 3323 Michael T Towle (OSC) , (215) 814

- 3272Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

74 Site Information Site Name: 43 rd St. Bay Drum and Steel Company EPA ID No.: FLR000033514 Address: 1608 North 43 rd St, Tampa, FL 33605

- 5938 County: Hillsborough NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0407014 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This drum recycling site operated from mid

- 1996 to June 1999. The Bay Drum and Steel Company specialized in the washing and reconditioning of drums and containers. Although the company was limited by permit to the types of containers that could be processed at the facility, the company accepted any kind of container without questions , including drums that had contained pesticides and solvents. The company was only allowed to accept empty drums for washing. They washed used metal and plastic drums that had contained a variety of products including pesticides, solvents, acids, and caustics. The process included spraying a methylene chloride solution on the labels to aid in their removal, soaking the drums in a caustic solution, pressure washing the drums, drying the drums, and painting them if necessary. It is known that the company accepted and washed drums that contained various amounts of chemicals. Bay Drum and Steel Company was under investigation for almost eight years for suspected violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and RCRA. The owner of the company, Mr. Benkovitz, pleaded guilty to violations of CWA and RCRA in 1997 and 1999. He ordered his employees to illegally discharge wastewater into a storm sewer that empties into Tampa's McKay Bay. Benkovitz also admitted that he directed employees of Bay Drum to dump polluted wastewater on property adjacent to Bay Drum's 43 rd Street facility from April until June 1998. During these periods, the company generated thousands of gallons of wastewater each week that contai ned several pollutants, includi ng spent pesticides and methyl chloride, a highly toxic solvent. While awaiting sentencing Mr. Benkovitz was under a RCRA Order but failed to comply (and committed additional violations). He was sentenced and the site became a CERCLA Emergency Removal Action in October 1999

. Description of Contamination : About 20,000 empty drums and 60,000 gallons of liquid hazardous wastes have been removed from the site. The cleanup costs were $3,285,094.17. The site was transferred to the Florida Brownfields Progr am. The site is contaminated with multiple hazardous substances including lead, chromium, and methylene chloride. Sources of Information: Black, Trevor. (Associate Regional Counsel, Office of Environmental Accountability, EPA Region 4). Email Corresp ondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 31 October 2005.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

75 EPA Region 4. “Administrative Record Index for the Forty

- Third Street Bay Drum Removal Site.” 25 October 2000. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region4/waste/errb/43bayst.pdf EPA Region 4. “Enforcement & Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report.” Fiscal Year 1999. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/ead/attachments/1999_accomplishments_report.pdf US Department of Justice. “Bay Drum and Steel Owner Pleads Guilty to Polluting Florida Bay Company Discharged Toxics Into Tampa’s Sewer System for Years.” 22 March 1999

. 19 January 2006. http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/1999/March/107enr.htm

. USEPA. “43 rd St. Bay Drum and Steel Company.” CERCLIS 27 October 2005. 19 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0407014 USEPA. “43 rd St. Bay Drum and Steel Company.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110005643090 Additional Contacts: Carmen (Julie) Santiago (RPM) , (404) 562

- 894Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

76 Site Information Site Name: Aerospace Recycling (Gerald B. Stringham, Jr.) EPA ID No.: FLD984258707 Address: 9689 and 9745 James Creek Road, Christmas, FL County: Orange NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Aerospace Recycling was a scrap metal recycling site abandoned in 1995 . There were several tanks and drums of circuit boards, capacitors, transformers, electronic equipment, metal shavings, sludge, oily liquids, propane tanks, crucibles for lead smelting, junk vehicles, and other solid waste left lying outside. Description of Contamination : Soil is contaminated with arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead. Sources of Information : Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email Correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. USEPA. “Aerospace Recycling.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110007466081 Additional Contacts : Augusta Posner (FDEP) (850) 245

- 2282, augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

77 Site Information Site Name: Callaway & Son Drum Service EPA ID No.: FLD094590916 Address: 890 East Lake Alfre d Drive, Lake Alfred, FL 33850 County: Polk NPL Site: Final: 5/11/00 In CERCLIS Database: 0400792 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Callaway & Son Drum Service (CSDS) was a family business that operated from 1977 until its abandonment in 1991 as a refurbisher and reseller of used 55

- gallon oil and citrus drums. Operations ceased in February 1991 when the facility came to the attention of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) after an application was submitted to operate and construct an industrial wastewater treatment and disposal system for discharge of rinse water used in its drum cleaning process. In December 1994, CSDS was auctioned and sold because of unpaid back taxes. The site contains an office building, a drum cleaning structure, and a sandblasting/painting structure ; all in dilapidated condition. There is also a 45,000 sq. ft. percolation pond that was located on site. At its peak, the operation processed 500 open

- top citrus drums and 20 spent oil/solv ents drums per day. In 1983, owners estimated that there were more than 60,000 drums on site. Description of Contamination : Contaminants include 1,2

- dichloroethene, tetrachloroethene (PCE ) , trichloroethene ( TCE ) , xylene and vinyl chloride. All of these can be attributed to the drum

- processing activities. The drums were washed and the contents were dumped into storage ponds. T argeting the wide variety of contaminants at the site had made cleanup activities very difficult

. USEPA removed 2,500 empty/partially empty drums from the site during cleanup in 2001. USEPA is developing a proposed plan to remediate the site’s contaminated areas. The site owner at the time of contamination (Ronald Callaway) is deceased and EPA is currently trying to identify gen erator PRPs. The site was sold at a tax sale in 2004 to Don Livingston. A supplemental remedial investigation and feasibility study may be conducted, as well as a remedial action , because of pesticides being found in the soil. The finalization of the site’s remedial plan will take approximately 2 years, and should be completed by 2006. Sources of Information : EPA Region 4. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 31 October 2005. Jackson, Galo (RPM) 404

- 562

- 8937, Interview

. 21 November 2005. USEPA. “ Superfund Site Progress Profile for Callaway & Son Drum Service.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 27 October 2005. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/c sitinfo.cfm?id=0400792 USEPA. “Callaway & Son Drum Service.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

78 http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_li st?facility_uin=110009273151 USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Callaway & Son Drum Service.” 12 December 2005. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/npl/nplfls/callawfl.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Callaway & Son Drum Service.” 11 May 2000. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0400792.pdf USEPA. “Potential Reuse Success Fact Sheet: Callaway & Son Drum Service.” October 2004. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/reuse/fl/callawaypotent.pdf Additional Contacts: Randall Chaffins (RPM) , (404 ) 562

- 8929 Galo Jackson (RPM) , (404) 562

- 8937 Jennifer Wendel (RPM) , (404) 562

- 8799 Tanya Floyd (Region 4) , (404) 562

- 9813Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

79 Site Information Site Name: Crosby Motors EPA ID No.: FL0000562603 Address: 3506 Clifford Lane, Jacksonville, FL 32209 County : Duval NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0406773 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The site has operated as various automotive salvage

- related businesses since 1968. Mr. and Mrs. Hicks were the prior owners and ori ginal operators of the salvage yard. They ceased to operate the business at some point in 1980s. Mr. James Crosby purchased the business and operated the yard from 1988 until as recently as 1994. Mr. Randy Taylor reportedly purchased the property in 1994. A 1994 site assessment by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP ) was completed following a report that there was improper disposal of automotive fluids throughout the site. Description of Contamination : The Crosby site was added to the FDEP state

- action site list in 1998. The IT Corporation, acting as the FDEP State Cleanup Contractor, submitted a Site Assessment Work Plan in August 2000. The FDEP requested a water well survey to be completed at this site after the initial project v isit. This survey indicated two potable wells located within 1⁄4 mile from the site. Sampling and analysis has indicated no water well contamination. The soil is contaminated with PAHs and phthalate esters. Groundwater is contaminated with VOCs, SVOCs, an d inorganic metals. Sediment samples collected from the drainage ditch along the property boundary contained PAHs, pesticides, PCBs, and inorganic metals. There was no water well contamination. Possible sources of contamination may have been from automob ile crushing resulting in the spillage of various fluids (i.e. antifreeze, waste oil, motor oil, gasoline, brake fluid, lead

- acid from batteries). In April 2001, 490 tons of tires, 750 tons of scrap metal , and 680 tons of debris were removed from the site

. Sources of Additional Information: Florida Department of Environmental Protection. “Waste Management Publications: Crosby Motors.” (n.d.) 19 October 2006. http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/quick_topics/publications/wc/sites/summary/115.pdf USEPA. “Crosby Motors.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 19 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0406773 USEPA. “Crosby Motors.” EPA Envirofacts Warehouse . 25 January 2006. 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009328487Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

80 Contacts: Jennifer Wendel (RPM) (404) 562

- 8799 Nancy Murchison (Florida DEP)Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

81 Site Information Site Name: Danmark, Inc. EPA ID No.: FL0001093103 Address: 4808 Paul St., Tampa, FL 33611 County: Hil lsborough NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0406338 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Danmark Co. is a former used oil hauler, collection , and recycling facility that was operated by various Danmark companies from 1989 to 1993. Willi am Michael Shaw was the operator of the Danmark Site and the president and general manager of Danmark. On September 30, 1998, Mr. Shaw pleaded guilty to illegally accepting and managi ng hazardous waste and storing hazardous waste wi thout a permit in violation of S ection 3008(d)(2)(A) of RCRA. He was charged with abandoning the facility in August 1993 and leaving behind 80,000 gallons of contaminated liquid waste and 150 tons of contaminated solid waste. Mr. Shaw did not join the settlement because USEPA determined that Mr. Shaw did not have the financial ability to do so. Since both the operator and most of the largest generators were orphan parties, USEPA agreed to compromise 25 percent of its response costs pursuant to the Orphan Share Policy. This settl ement requires the settling parties to waive their contribution rights against parties that sent less than 2,000 gallons of materials to the site. Description of Contamination : Abandoned materials were left on site. USEPA completed the transportation and disposal phase of the removal action at the Danmark site in March of 1996. During the removal action, approximately 80,000 gallons of liquid waste and 150 tons of solid waste (stockpiled soils, used oil filters and sludge) were processed and disposed of off site. On April 14, 2000, USEPA finalized a settlement with 59 settling parties for recovery of USEPA ’s past costs associated with the removal action taken at the site. This settlement, pursuant to Sections 107(a) and 122(h) of CERCLA , provides for the reimbursement by the settling parties of $516,374.57 in response costs incurred by USEPA

. Sources of Information: Daily Environmental Report No. 191, “State, Federal Officials Crack Down on Criminal Violators in Tampa Bay.” BNA, Inc. 2 October 1998. 21 January 2006. http://pubs.bna.com/NWSSTND/IP/BNA/den.nsf/SearchAllView/6EA088D64F5BF8AD 85256691000BC1D9?Open&highlight=RECYCLER EPA Region 4. “Enforcement & Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report

Fiscal Year 2000. ” (n.d.) 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region4/ead/attachments/2000_accomplishments_report.pdf USEPA. “Danmark Site.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 19 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

82 http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id= 0406338 USEPA. “Danmark Site.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . 25 January 2006. 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009 273838Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

83 Site Information Site Name: Don’s Recycling (aka Al Salvaged Auto Parts) EPA ID No.: FLR000085878 Address: 3141 Sharpe Rd., Apopka, FL 32703 County: Orange NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Don’s Recycling is a 15

- acre property located at the end of a residential neighborhood . The site has been used as an automotive salvage/scrap metal yard for more than 30 years. In 2002, the Florida State Department of Environmental Protection insp ected the facility and observed petroleum stains and piles of battery casings on a large portion of the property. Description of Contamination : The property owner determined the soil lead concentration is over TCLP hazardous waste levels. Additionally, the property has petroleum contamination. The department is currently working with the property owner to dispose of the contaminated soil and continue the assessment. The original property owner passed away and the heir is trying to resume remediation b ut does not have the financial capability to do so at this time. Sources of Information: Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email Correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. US EPA. “Don’s Recycling.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110012550970 Additional Contacts: Augusta Posner (FDEP) , (850) 245

- 2282, augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

84 Site Information Site Name: Energy Savings LTD, Inc EPA ID No.: FLR000032821 Address: 3080 Fowler St., Fort Myers, FL 33901 County: Lee NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database : No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Energy Savings LTD, Inc is a lamp recycling company, which was junking the bulbs into a dumpster out back. The site was abandoned for the landowner to clean up. Description of Contamination : Unknown Sources of Information: Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email Correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. USEPA. “Energy Savings.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.) . 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110005642698 Additional Contacts: Augusta Posner (FDEP) , (850) 245

- 2282, augusta.posner @dep.state.fl.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

85 Site Information: Site Name: Florida Petroleum Reprocessors EPA ID No.: FLD984184127 Address: 3211 S.W. 50th Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314 County: Broward NPL Site: Final: 3/06/98 In CERCLIS Database: 0406469 Site History and/or Description of Recycling Operation: This site is a former waste oil reprocessing facility that operated from 1979 through 1992 under various names. Operations were reported to include the collection of waste oil (i.e., used motor oil, surplus fuels, marine oils and slops, hydraulic oils, aviation oils, and fuels) from local automotive, agricultural, and marine enterprises. Millions of gallons of waste oil were processed at this facility. Incoming waste oils were filtered, graded according to water content, and stored on site in large bulk tanks. The waste oil was typically sold as fuel or to other waste oil marketers. Current records indicate that more than 15 million gallons of waste oil were processed at this facility. The Florida D epartment of Environmental Protection (FDEP) stated that there was hazardous waste on the site but it was difficult to prove its existence. Description of Contamination : Little is known about the actual waste h andling practices at the site. However, studies conducted by the USEPA show that former operations at the facility resulted in contamination of surface and subsurface soils and groundwater by oil and grease, organic chemicals common to gasoline, and chlorinated cleaning and degreasi ng solvents. The studies showed that contaminants were found in a concentrated form floating on top of the water table, as well as in a dispersed form mixed with the underlying groundwater. Contaminants have migrated downward from land surface to a depth of 200 feet into the aquifer. USEPA 's comprehensive investigation of the facility in 1998 documented a plume of groundwater contamination over 600 acres in size, extending into the Biscayne aquifer to a depth over 140 feet, as well as high levels of contaminated soil and residual amounts of highly concentrated non

- aqueous phase liquids (NAPL). These contaminants likely resulted in the contamination of the Peele

- Dixie Wellfield in 1986. In 1997, USEPA removed numerous containers from the site. In 1999, a second removal action excavated approximately 6000 tons of highly contaminated soil to a depth of approximately 15 feet. A third removal action from 2001

- 2003 was very successful in removing the bulk of contaminants in the subsurface soil through in

si tu treatment of subsurface contaminants via chemical oxidation. Samples collected by USEPA from aboveground tanks indicated the presence of 1,1

- dichloroethane, 1,1,1

- trichloroethane, trichloroethene, and tetrachloroethene. Two contaminants, 1,1

- dichloro ethene and vinyl chloride, are present in the groundwater at levels high enough to be a potential health concern.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

86 The cleanup cost at this site was estimated at $4,200,000; however, cleanup costs may reach $6

- $7 million. Sources of Information: Agenc y for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. “Health Consultation: Florida Petroleum Reprocessors.” 2 June 1997. 20 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/florpet/fpr.html Brad Jackson (EPA Superfund Project Manager Region 4) , (404) 562

- 8925, Interview

. 21 November 2005. EPA Region 4. “EPA Record of Decision: Florida Petroleum Reprocessors.” March 2001. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/npl/nplfls/fprrod.pdf USEPA. “ Superfund Site Progress Profile for Florida Petroleum Reprocessors.” CERCLIS

. 11 September 2006. 19 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0406469 USEPA. “Florida Petroleum Reprocessors.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009328049 USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Florida Petroleum Reprocessors.” 12 December 2005. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/npl/nplfls/flpetrfl.htm Additional Contacts: Augusta Posner (FDEP) , (850) 245

- 2282, augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.us Brad Jackson ( EPA Superfund Project Manager Region 4) , (404) 562

- 8925, Jackson.brad@epa.gov Paul Wierzbicki (District Office FDEP SE District Office) , (561) 681

- 6677 Jennifer K. Wills (Assistant Regional Counsel USEPA , Region 4) , (404) 562

- 9562Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

87 Site Information Site Name: Helms Drum Service EPA ID No.: Address: 1764 State Road 655, Auburndale, FL 33823 County: Polk NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Helms Drum Service is approximately 4.5 acres containing f ive buildings an d an access road. Structures on site are the Helms residence, a greenhouse , and three buildings associated with the drum cleaning operation. The facility, owned by Mr. Leroy Helms, began operations in the mid

- 1970s and continued until July 1984. General operations consisted of purchasing and reconditioning spent oil drums and open - top drums from the citrus industry. On a typical day , an estimated 40 drums and up to 300 gallons of spent oil were treated. Drum reconditioning consisted of a seven - step process utilizing kerosene to remove oil residues and a caustic soda (sodium hydroxide) rinse. Spent caustic soda was neutralized with acid (HCl or H 2 SO 4 ) and the process wastewater was discharged to a percolation pond. The percolation pond was a naturally occurring surface depression enlarged to accommodate the volume of wastewater it received. In early 1982, the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) discovered that the Helms facility was discharging to groundwater without a permit. In April 1982, FDER sampled effluent from the drum washing operation. The analysis revealed elevated levels of lead, chromium and zinc. Consequently, Helms applied to FDER in August 1982 for a discharge permit. FDER did not issue the permit. In February 1984, following sampling by both FDER and a consultant representing Helms Drum Service, FDER issued an order to cease all operations and remediate the soil adjacent to the drum reclamation area, the percolation pond , and associated groundwater. Helms agreed to comply with the order. Description of Contamination : By July 1985 , all drum reconditioning equipment was removed from the site and the percolation pond bottom was excavated under the direction of Helms’ consultant . Twenty cubic yards of c ontaminated sediment was also removed. Sample results have indicated that natural attenuation has been an appropriate remediation strategy for groundwater, following the cleanup of contaminated soils. The primary concern at the facility was groundw ater contamination migration of toward the adjacent wetland and potentially Lake Juliana. Groundwater analyses detected lead, chromium, mercury , and sodium concentrations above primary drinking water standards, and zinc levels above secondary drinking water standards. Additionally, several organic compounds and cyanide had been detected. The FDEP Hazardous Waste Cleanup Section spent a total of approximately $145,000 for site investigation activities. There are no records of the costs incurred by the property owner for excavation/disposal . FDEP delisted the site from the State Action List in January 1995.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

88 Sources of Information: Don Harris (Florida Department of Environmental Protection) , Email

. 22 January 2005. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. “Waste Management Publications: Helms Drum Service.” 22 May2000. 20 January 2006. http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/quick_topics/publications/w c/sites/summary/098.pdf USEPA. “Leroy Helms Drum Service.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 19 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0400814

.
Additional Contacts: Don Harris (Environmental Manager, Hazardous Waste Cleanup Section, Florida Department of Environmental Protection) , Don.Harris@dep.state.fl.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

89 Site Information Site Name: Holl oway Waste Oil EPA ID No.: FLD980798946 Address: 6626 Guthrie Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32205 County: Duval NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0406399 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This site operated as a waste oil recycling facility for approximately 20 years under Mr. Floyd Holloway. The exact process employed to recycle the wastes i s unknown. The facility operated until 1995, when the U.S. Internal Revenue Service temporarily seized the property for nonpayment of taxes , at which point the property was abandoned. In 1998, Mr. Holloway was indicted by the state of Florida for improper storage of hazardous waste. His whereabouts are currently unknown. Description of Contamination : In 1995, USEPA conducted an emergency removal action at the site after discovering numerous drums, tanks , and containers, most of which were in poor condition. There was evidence of prior attempts of removal , including areas where surface soils were heavily stained by waste oils. A surface impoundment was observed to be leaking oily waste into a drainage ditch. Elevated levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) , volatile organic compounds, and metals were detected in samples collected from various containers. Elevated levels of s ome contaminants were discovered in groundwater, including chlorobenzene, methyl tertiary

- butyl ether (MTBE ) , PCBs, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDD ) , and various inorganics. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP ) recommended further action at the site in April 1996, and the USEPA conducted a limited excavation of visibly stained soils. A total of 756 cubic yards of soil was removed from the site and transported to the Springhill Landfill in Graceville, Florida. The excavated areas were then backfilled with clean fill material and seeded to prevent erosion. On December 14, 1999, this S uperfund settlement was finalized. The settlement, pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA, provides for the reimbursement by 100+ generators of waste oil of $1,289,852 in response costs incurred by USEPA . The total cos ts at the site were $1,719,803. H owever , USEPA determined that the site was eligible for the Orphan Share Policy and compromised 25 percent of past costs in recognition of the insolvency of the owner/operator. The Holloway Waste Oil site was approved as a state funded cleanup site in September 2001. In May 2003, FDEP issued a work assignment to Arcadis Geraghty & Miller, Inc. (AG&M) for an Initial Site Assessment Work Plan. During development of the Work Plan, AG&M discovered that the adjacent property owner had purchased the former Holloway site , thereby making them potentially responsible for cleanup.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

90 FDEP delisted the site from state cleanup on January 31, 2005 . It returned the site to the Northeast District for potential enforcement actions and possible additional assessment via the Bureau of Waste Cleanup’s Site Investigation Section. Sources of Additional Information: EPA Region 4. “Fiscal Year 2000 Enforcement & Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report.” 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region4/ead/attachments/2000_accomplishments_report.pdf Florida State Department of Environmental Protection. “Publications: Holloway Waste Oil.” (n.d. ). 20 January 2006. http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/quick_topics/publications/wc/sites/summary/126.pdf Kat West (Brownfield and Land Revitalization Legal Coordinator), Interview . 21 November 2005. USEPA. “Holloway Waste Oil.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006

. 19 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0406399 USEPA. “Holloway Waste Oil.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110002541991 Contacts: Ted

- Osc Walden (RPM) Theresa Pepe (Florida Department of Environmental Protection) Kathleen (Kat) West (Associate Regional Counsel, Brownfield and Land Revitalization Leg al Coordinator) , (404) 562

- 9574, (404) 562

- 9486Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

91 Site Information Site Name: International Processing Specialists (IPS) (aka BCX Facility) EPA ID No.: FLD982109761 Address: 1859 East Adams Street, Jacksonville, FL 322020 County: Duval NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0407787 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: International Processing Specialists (IPS) operated a used oil processing facility until June 2001. The operation included storage and treatment of used oil, oily wastewater , and non

- hazardous industrial wastewater in over 11 tanks with a total capacity of approximately 1.3 million gallons. The company abandoned the site, leaving over 1 million gallons of used oil and other waste. Violations at the facility were first uncovered during an inspection in 1995. Following the discovery, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) entered into a Consent Order with IPS to resolve violations while allowing the company to continue to operate. However, four subsequent in spections in 1998 and 1999 revealed repeat violations including operating unpermitted units on and off site; failing to comply with permit conditions; failure to remove used oil from secondary containment ; and failure to clean up spills. As a final remedy, FDEP issued an order to revoke the company’s permit on March 15, 2002. Description of Contamination : In summer 2005 , US EPA completed a major clean up to remove waste from the tanks and stop leakage from the tanks. Sources of Information : Florida State Department of Environmental Protection

– Press Office. “State Revokes Waste Permit.” 10 May 2002. 20 January 2006. http://www.dep.state.fl.us/secretary/news/2002/02

- 051.htm
Po sner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email Correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. USEPA. “International Processing Specialists.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 200 6. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110002562879 USEPA. “BCX Facility.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 19 October 2006. http://cfpub.ep a.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0407787 Additional Contacts: Augusta Posner (FDEP) , (850) 245

- 2282, augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

92 Site Information Site Name: Joel C. Patterson and AC EPA ID No.: FLR000012955 Address: 2919 S. Street, Fort Myers, FL 339160 County: Lee NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Joel C. Patterson and AC was an AC and mercury lamp recycler. It violated hazardous waste, storage tank, petroleum cleanup, solid w aste, air, freon, and TSCA regulations. Description of Contamination : 2,800 waste tires, 1,000

- gallon tank of used oil, and several unmarked 55

- gallon drums were removed by the property owner. Cleanup costs ranged from $500,000

- $1,000,000. Sources of Information : Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email Correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. USEPA. “Joel C. Patterson.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 20 06. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110005633485 Additional Contacts: Augusta Posner (FDEP) (850) 245

- 2282, augusta.posner@dep.state.f l.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

93 Site Information Site Name: Kempton Brothers, Inc. EPA ID No.: FLR000054353 Address: 14525 N. Florida, Tampa, FL 33613 County: Hillsborough NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Kemp ton Brothers recovered and cleaned used automobile parts. B etween 1976 and 1994, solvents and other pollutants were illegally flushed into a gravel

- lined pit. At various times, the defendants excavated sludge containing hazardous waste from the pit and il legally disposed of it by sending it to the scrap yard. On September 18, 1998 , Kempton Brothers pleaded guilty to two counts of knowingly disposing of hazardous waste. Robert Bruce Kempton, president of the salvage operation and auto parts business, ple aded guilty to one count of knowingly disposing of hazardous waste and one count of willfully making a false statement to a law officer. Kempton faces a maximum term of 10 years in prison and fines of $50,000 per day per violation. The violations occurre d daily between September 1992 and May 1994. Description of Contamination : Solvents illegally disposed in gravel

- lined pit. Groundwater studies conducted by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation indicate contamination of wells in the area of the facility operated by Kempton Brothers. Sources of Information: Daily Environmental Report No. 191, “State, Federal Officials Crack Down on Criminal Violators in Tampa Bay.” BNA, Inc. 2 October 1998. 21 January 2006. http://pubs.bna.com/NWSSTND/IP/BNA/den.nsf/SearchAllView/6EA088D64F5BF8AD 85256691000BC1D9?Open&highlight=RECYCLER USEPA. “Florida Auto Salvage Company Charged In Waste Case.” 16 January 1998. 19 October 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/4258bece1914bf83 8525701c005e1fb9/76097c 29d7dc8c578525658e00671265!OpenDocument USEPA. “Kempton Brothers Porsche Parts.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.) 20 January 2006. http://o aspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110005655362Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

94 Site Information Site Name: Miami Battery EPA ID No.: FLD004119426 Address: 1110 NW South River Drive, Miami, FL 33178 County: Miami

- Dade NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archive d Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Miami Battery is a battery manufacturing operation that included smelting. Description of Contamination : Lead contamination is the result of leaking batteries and filter, acid holding tanks, rinsi ng water from sludge collection tanks, and washdown water. The site is being cleaned up under a state consent order. Sources of Information : Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email Correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. USEPA. “Miami Battery Manufacturing Company.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.ep a.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000872878 USEPA. “Miami Battery & Electric Corp.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 19 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0400547

. Contacts: Augusta Posner (FDEP ) , (850) 24 5

- 2285 , augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.us

.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

95 Site Information Site Name: Progressive Marketing Group, Inc. (PMG Finishing) EPA ID No.: FLD982085003 Address: 4701 L.B. McLeod Road, Orlando, FL 32811 County: Hennepin NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : In 1988, the Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy notified the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) that PMG Finishing purchased 500 gallons of paint for $5.00. Possible fraudulent recycling activities were investigated. PMG had just begun metal finishing operations in Orlando and identified the material as usable product. PMG went out of busin ess around 1990. In October, 1994, a semi

- trailer containing numerous drums and containers of waste solvents, corrosives , and paints was found abandoned along side a roadway in Marion County, Florida. Labels on some containers identified PMG as a source. FDEP incurred $26,469 in disposal costs. Description of Contamination : Unknown Sources of Information : Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email Correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. USEPA. “PMG Finishing.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 19 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110007421959 Additional Contacts : Augusta Posner (FDEP ) , (850) 245

- 2285 , augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.us

.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

96 Site Information: Site Name: Romarc Industries EPA ID No.: FL0002072882 Address: 2490 N.E. 200th Avenue, Williston, FL 32696 County: Levy NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 040678 6 Description of Recycling Operation: In the late 1980s and early '90s, Romarc received hazardous wastes, primarily flammable resins, from companies throughout the United States, but minimal recycling occurred. The company stored waste in drums that were kept in an enclosure with a concrete floor and roof. Other drums were kept outside on the ground. Around 1996, the facility went out of business and abandoned the drums of hazardous waste. FDEP believes that the facility tried using polyester resi n to make resin casts and molds for concrete products. The facility marketed a few products , such as railroad cross ties and artificial reef structures , in an attempt to demonstrate that it was producing a valuable product. Romarc received a contract fro m the Solid Waste Research Division of the University of Florida to produce concrete artificial reef structures using the polyester resin casts. The facility did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : US EPA was contacted by the FDEP in February 1998 for assistance with a site assessment and possible removal action. An estimated 1,000 drums of flammable resin waste, in various stages of deterioration, were found at the site. Since minimal recycling occurred at the facility, contamination most likely came from the drums. While there was some soil contamination, the potential for a fire or a future release from deteriorating drums was the biggest concern. The potentially responsible parties (PRP s) cleanup was approximately $535,000. Outs tanding costs at the site were just less than $5 00,000 , of which $25,000 was US EPA’s cost prior to PRP take over. The remaining $475,000 consisted of oversight costs and enforcement costs. Sources of Additional Information: EPA Region 4. Email Corresp ondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 31 October 2005. EPA Region 4 Environmental News. “EPA Superfund Removal to Begin at the Romarc Industries Site, Williston, Levy County, FL.” 26 March 1999. 21 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/oeapages/99press/032699.htm Luetscher, Gregory (EPA Region 4), (404) 562

- 9677, Interview. 22 November 2005. Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email Correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

97 USEPA. “Romarc Industries.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006

. 19 October 2006. http://cfpub .epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0406786 USEPA. “Romarc Industries.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110005634536 Contacts: John Nolen (EPA On

- Scene Coordinator) , (404) 562

- 8750 Augusta Posner (FDEP ) , (850) 245

- 2282, augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.us Beth Knauss (FDEP District Office ) , (813) 744

- 6100 x383 Gregory D. Luet scher (EPA Region 4 ) , (404) 562

- 9677Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

98 Site Information Site Name: Rouse Steel Drum Co. EPA ID No.: FLD032391542 Address: 612 12 th Street East, Jacksonville, FL 32206 County: Duval NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0404733 Site History and Descriptio n of Recycling Operation : This facility was an “empty” drum reconditioning facility. It generated waste water on site from the reconditioning processes and w astes were spilled to the ground. Description of Contamination : The facility went out of busin ess . EPA

- funded CERCLA removals took place in 1993 and 1994, and a PRP

- funded removal occurred in 1997. Sources of Information : Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email Correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Offi ce of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. USEPA. “Rouse Steel Drum.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 19 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0404733 USEPA. “Rouse Steel Drum.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.) 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110002528612 Additional Contacts : Augusta Posner (FDEP ), (850) 245

- 2285, augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

99 Site Information Site Name: Rowe Paint and Plas

- Chem Coatings (Wilmer Rowe) EPA ID No.: FLD984243923 Addre ss: 144 Watts St. Jacksonville, FL 322090 County: Duval NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Waste paint and solvents were dumped onto the floor of a warehouse that had formerly been leased by Mr. R owe. Plas

- Chem Coatings was the main paint manufacturing facility where Mr. Rowe generated waste solvent and waste paint that he claimed he was recycling. Mr. Rowe was eventually incarcerated and the property owner paid $400,000 to dispose of the paints, solvents , and chemicals left behind. Description of Contamination : Unknown Sources of Information : Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email Correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2 005. USEPA. “Rowe Paint.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.) 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110005618885 Additio nal Contacts : Augusta Posner (FDEP ) , (850) 245

- 2285, augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.us ,Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

100 Site Information : Site Name: Schuylkill Metals Corp. EPA ID No.: FLD062794003 Address: 40 2 S Woodrow Wilson Dr., Plant City , FL 33566 County: Hillsborough NPL Site: Deleted: 8/22/2001 In CERCLIS Database: 0400710 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: From 1972 until 1986, this facility recovered lead from storage batteries . The process consisted of transporting the batteries to the site, sawing the tops off, dumping the sulfuric acid on the ground , and loading the lead plates onto a railroad car to go to the smelter. Empty battery casings were put in an on

- site landfill. In October 1988, a RCRA closure permit was issued under the provisions of Section 403.722, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 17

- 3 , 17

- 4, 17

- 21, and 17

- 30. The permit directed Schuylkill Metals to close the unlined hazardous waste pond and specified the closure procedures. The RCRA closure/post

- closure plan for the disposal pond will be addressed by the CERCLA design for remedial action. This site did not have a RCRA Part B permit. Description of Contamination : US EPA determine d that the pollution from this site was due to current operations, thereby subjecting the facility to RCRA Corrective Action , not CERCLA. Groundwater underlying the facility was contaminated with heavy metals such as lead and chromium, as well as sulfate and ammonia. The cleanup expenditure at this site as of September 2004 was $612,421.63. Sources of Information: USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 15 January 2004. USEPA. “Schuylkill Metals Corp.” RCRAInfo . 2 S eptember 2000. 21 January 2006. USEPA. “Schuylkill Metals of Plant City Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000611446 USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile: Schuylkill Metals.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 20 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa .gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0400710 USEPA. “Superfund Record of Decision: Schuylkill Metals Corp.”28 September 1990. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/s ites/rods/fulltext/r0490061.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

101 Additional Contacts: Randall Chaffins (RPM) , (404) 562

- 8929 Galo Jackson (RPM) , (404) 562

- 8937 Don Rigger (OSC) , (404) 347

- 3931 Kelsey Helton FL (850) 245

- 8967 Jennifer K. Wills , (404) 562

- 9562 Annette Hill , (404) 562

- 806 0Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

102 Site Information: Site Name: Singleton Battery EPA ID No.: FLD980845697 Address: 551 North Ellis Road, Jacksonville, FL 322 050 County: Duval NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This facility was a battery recycling facility that discharged waste acid/lead onto the ground at the facility. The facility closed, but site cleanup remains in process under a generator closure consent order. Final RCRA closure was designated in February 2002. Description of Contamination : This facility has off

- site contamination. Sources of Information: Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. US EPA. “Singleton Battery Co Inc” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 19 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcris_web.report?pgm_sys_id=FLD980845697 Additional Contacts: John Saltford (Facility owner) , (904) 783

- 0110 Augusta Posner (Florida Department of Environmental Protection) , (850) 245

- 2285 augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

103 Site Information: Site Name: Singleton Battery/TPA EPA ID No.: FLD047090725 Address: 2120 N. 71 st Street, Tampa , FL 33619 County: Hillsborough NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Singleton Battery is a lead acid battery supply , service, and repair facility. Description of Contamination : Operations resulted in soil and groundwater contamination (lead and low pH). The site is being cleaned up under a generator closure consent order. Sources of Information: Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. USEPA. “Singleton Battery Co Inc” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110002531369 Additional Contacts: Fred Singl eton (Facility Owner) , (813) 621

- 4618 Augusta Posner (Florida Department of Environmental Protection) , (850) 245

- 2285, augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

104 Site Information Site Name: Tri

- City Oil Cons ervationist, Inc. EPA ID No.: FLD070864541 Address: 8767 1⁄2 N. 50 th St, Tampa, FL 33617 County: Hillsborough NPL Site: Deleted: 09/01/1988 In CERCLIS Database: 0400733 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Tri

- City Oil Conservatio nist Corporation property, oc cupying about 1⁄4

- acre, housed a heating oil business from the 1960s to 1975. From 1978 to 1983, the facility acted as a waste oil storage and distribution center. Three aboveground storage tanks and one known underground storage tank were on site. While it operated, the state received complaints about the odor and sloppy practices at the facility. In 1982, 3,000 gallons of oil were spilled. When the owner failed to clean up the site at the request of the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), the USEPA removed the bulk of the oil and later removed contaminated soil. Tri

- City was dissolved involuntarily in 1983, and the owners are in bankruptcy. Description of Contamination : Elevated levels of lead were found in initial groundwater sampling, but no elevated levels were found in later samples. Soil excavated from the area was heavily contaminated with volatile organic compounds and heavy metals from former site activities. In February 1984, USEPA spent approximately $50,000 for immediate removal action at the site. The removal of contaminated soils and sludges in1984 eliminated the threats to human health and the environment. Other owner/operators are in bankruptcy. A cost of recovery action against the potentially responsible parties may be initiated under the authority of S ections 107 and 122(H) of CERCLA. Florida spent approximately $55,000 for a contamination assessment and $145,000 for its May 1985 removal action. The state is currently pursuing a civil c ost recovery action against the owner/operators of the site. In 1986, tests of soil, groundwater, and sediment showed that the source of contamination was removed Sources of Information: USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Tri

- City Oil Conservationist Inc.” 21 September 1987. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0487023.pdf

. USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Tri

- City Oil Conservationist Inc.” 21 September 1984. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0400733.pdf

.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

105 USEPA. “Tri

- City Oil Conservation One

- Page Summary.” 29 June 2004. 20 January 20 06. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle/success/1

- pagers/tricity.htm

. USEPA. “ Superfund Site Progress Profile for Tri

- City Oil C onservationist Inc .” CERCLIS

. 11 September 2006. 19 October 2006 http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0400733 USEPA. “ Tri

- City Oil Conservationist Inc ” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=1100083 28087 A dditional Contacts: K. Cleghron (RPM) , (404) 257

- 2643Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

106 Site Information Site Name: UNC EPA ID No.: FLD984166942 Address: 1 1/2 Mile East of Highway 37 on State Road 640, Mulberry, FL 33860 County: Polk NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: UNC reclaimed cadmium and nickel from 1988

- 1991. Description of Contamination : Soil and groundwater contamination are being remediated by a subsequent owner under a state generator consent order. Sources of Information: Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. USEPA. “ UNC Recovery Corporation .” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110007435374

. Additional Contacts: Augusta Posner (Florida Department of Environmental Protecti on) , (850) 245

- 2285, augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

107 Site Information: Site Name: United Metals, Inc. EPA ID No.: FLD098924038 Address: Highway 71 South, Marianna, FL 32446 County: Jacks on NPL Site: Final: 4/30/2003 In CERCLIS Database: 0400804 Site History and/or Description of Recycling Operation: From 1979 until 1991, United Metals, Inc., processed and recycled lead

- acid and nickel

- cadmium batteries. In 1981, the facility process ed as many as 10,000 to 12,000 batteries per week, resulting in 2,500 gallons of acidic wastes per day. Until 1981, treated and possibly untreated wastewater from the recycling process flowed into a settling basin, then into concrete basins, and finally through a ditch to an unlined holding pond. In 1982, the wastewater system was modified so that wastewater could be neutralized in storage tanks and recycled back into plant operations, which eliminated wastewater discharges to the holding ponds. A second holding pond was constructed to provide additional capacity, but allegedly was never used. The holding ponds subsequently were abandoned, dredged, and backfilled. Dredged sediments from the holding ponds and from contaminated drainage ditches are currently stockpiled in the recycling building on site. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP ) considered the recycling practice to be legitimate at the time. The facility operated under a recycling exemption from RCRA. In August 1981, FDEP and United Metals, Inc., entered into a Consent Order that required numerous actions to be undertaken by United Metals. These actions included payment of a fine; submittal of a detailed plan evaluating the wastewater system; identification of environmental problems; completion of a limited ground water assessment; and proposal of corrective actions. In July 1986, USEPA conducted a RCRA inspection and noted that RCRA violations persisted. The violations included improper closure of the holding p onds foll owing sediment removal; improper storage of hazardous wastes; inadequate ground water monitoring; and operating without appropriate permits for hazardous waste storage and treatment. As a result of these violations, USEPA issued an Amended Complaint and C ompliance Order. United Metals discontinued recycling operations and sold the facility to Anrich Industries, Inc. Anrich subsequently renovated the facility and began battery

- cracking operations in May 1991. On May 22, 1991, FDEP conducted a Hazardous W aste Inspection of the facility and noted several RCRA violations and, in July 1991, ordered that all operations cease. The site is now abandoned and listed on the National Priorities List (NPL)

. Description of Contamination : Releases of lead, chromium, and other metals have been documented in facility soils, in a nearby wetland, and in a habitat used by a federally threatened species. The release also poses a threat to a downstream recreational fishery and additional wetland areas.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

108 In June 1993 , a site inspection included collection of 15 soil samples and the installation of five monitoring wells. Soil samples collected from the facility production area and drainage ditches were contaminated with lead. In 1994, an Expanded Site Investigation c onfirmed the presence of lead at significant levels in facility soils and in the drainage ditch that flows into the wetland area. In March 1995, the USEPA Removal Assessment Team conducted a site visit to determine the site’s eligibility for a removal action. USEPA collected six surface soils samples, four waste samples from 55

- gallon drums and three storage tanks, and two water samples to identify the nature and extent of contamination and the immediate threat to the public and environment. Lead was detected in soils, a flammable liquid was discovered in drums, and 800 gallons of sulfuric acid w ere found in an on

- site storage tank. The main area of concern at the United Metals facility is contaminated soil where the battery recycling activities were performed, as well as contaminated soil along the drainage route to the wetland area located west of the facility. Metals contamination has been documented in the wetland. Sources of Additional Information: EPA Region 4. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). October 2005. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. “United Metals, Inc.” n.d. 20 January 2006. http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/book_shelf/225_UnitedMetals.pdf

. Posner, Augusta. (State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection). Email correspondence to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 17 March 2005. USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for United Metals Inc.” 30 April 2003. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0400804.pdf USEPA. “ Superfund Site Progress Profile for United Metals Inc .” CERCLIS

. 27 October 2005. 19 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0400804 USEPA. “ United Metals .” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 20 January 200 6. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110012597430 Contacts: Augusta Posner (FDEP) , (850) 245

- 2282 , augusta.posner@dep.state.fl.us Jim Byer (Hazardous Waste Section Supervisor, FDEP, Northwest District), (850) 595

- 8360 ext 1264, James.Byer@dep.state.fl.us Joe Al fano (Remedial Project Manager, EPA Region 4 )Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

109 Site Information Site Name: Yellow Water Road Dump EPA ID No.: FLD980844179 Address: 1190 Yellow Water Road, Baldwin, FL 32234 County: Duval NPL Site: Deleted 5/18/1999 In CERCLIS Database: 0400933 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The 14

- acre Yellow Water Road Dump site is a former storage area for PCB

- contaminated liquids and electrical equipment that began in 1981 as a salvage operation for transformers. The property, originally purchased in 1940 for c ommercial development, was later acquired by the American Environmental Energy Corporation (AEEC). In 1981, AEEC entered into a joint venture with two other corporations with the intent of moving an incinerator to the site to destroy PCBs and began on

- site storage of PCB

- contaminated liquids and electrical equipment at the former operational area in anticipation of upcoming on

- site incineration operations. The proper permits for the incinerator were never obtained. In 1982, PCB

- contaminated oils were spil led at the site during on

- site salvage operations to remove valuable metal parts from transformer carcasses. The operation ended in 1984 when the property was rezoned. An estimated 150,000 gallons of PCB

contaminated fluids were stored at the site. Much of this fluid leaked from storage vessels and contaminated site soils and the underlying surficial aquifer. Description of Contamination : Groundwater, sediment , and soil are contaminated with PCBs. In 1984, US EPA conducted a removal action that include d cleaning and storing 719 electrical transformers; securing 100,000 gallons of PCB liquids in onsite holding tanks; and excavating and storing 3,000 cubic yards of PCB

- contaminated soil onsite. In 1988, US EPA directed a second removal action that included demolishing an onsite warehouse; disposing of warehouse debris and stockpiling contaminated soil off site; incinerating 78,854 gallons of PCB liquids off site; and disposing of 704 transformers and 18,690 pounds of capacitors off site. Sources of Information: EPA Region 4. “Florida NPL/NPL Caliber Cleanup Site Summaries.” 13 December 2005. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/npl/nplfln/yellowfl.htm USEPA. “EPA Sup erfund Record of Decision: Yellow Water Road Dump.” 28 September 1990. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0490067.pdf USEPA. “EPA Superfund Re cord of Decision: Yellow Water Road Dump.” 30 June 1992. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0492103.pdf USEPA. “Federal Register Notice

– Noti ce of Deletion of Yellow Water Road Dump Superfund Site from the National Priorities List (NPL).” 18 May 1999. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/d990518.htmAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Florida

110 USEPA. “Final Five

- Year Review Report Second Five

- Year Review for Yellow Water Road Superfund Site.” September 2005. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/fiveyear/f05

- 04018 .pdf USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Yellow Water Road Dump.” 10 June 1986. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0400933.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile: Yellow Water Road Dump.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0400933 USEPA. “Yellow Water Road Dump Superfund Site Five Year Review Report.” 13 September 2000. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/fiveyear/f00

- 04025.pdf Additional Contacts: Dave Keefer (RPM) , (404) 562

- 8932Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Georg ia

111 Site Information Site Name: Alternate Energy Resources, Inc. EPA ID No.: GAD033582461 Address: 2936 Walden Drive, Augusta, GA 30904 County: Richmond NPL Site: Proposed: 9/14/2005 In CERCLIS Database: 0401411 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Alternate Energy Resources (AER) property is a 2.64

- acre abandoned property. From 1975 to 2000, AER operated as a commercial hazardous waste storage and treatment facility until it declared bankruptcy and shut down. It formerly recycled oil and solvents. AER began operations in early 1975, when AER purchased the Nimmons Oil Company property. AER's waste treatment processes included: blending high

BTU hazardous waste to be used as fuel in off

- site industrial boilers and f urnaces; recycling hazardous waste solvents by distillation; and treating used oils, hazardous and non

- hazardous wastewater, and non

- hazardous coolants. AER filed for bankruptcy on December 13, 2000. The site was in RCRA’s corrective action program, but wa s transferred to CERCLA. The State conducted a preliminary assessment/site investigation ( PA/SI)

. USEPA is hoping that a potentially responsible party (PRP ) group will form to conduct the remedial investigation/feasibility study ( RI/FS ) . Units on the si te received RCRA Part B permits in September 1987, December 1989, and September 1997. Description of Contamination : Contamination is the result of poor operation and spills that occurred over a number of years. Improper management of residuals specifi cally led to environmental damage. The sources of site contamination include: soil contamination that is present at significantly elevated concentrations; a 3,000

- gallon toluene and heptane spill; a 500

- gallon release from a rainwater collection basin; a 13,191

- gallon waste oil, inks, and oil processing residues spill; and a 70,000

- gallon former unlined surface impoundment. Contaminants of concern associated with activities at the AER facility include trichloroethene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE). TCE and PCE were detected in ground water samples and soil samples at concentrations significantly above background concentrations . The soil contamination is on site and groundwater contamination is off site. Cleanup costs are currently being developed by EPA Region 4. Sources of Information: EPA Region 4. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 31 October 2005. Michuda, Colleen E. (EPA Region 4) Interview, 21 November 2005. USEPA. “ Alternative Energy Resources .” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 19 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0401411

.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Georg ia

112 USEPA. “ Alternate Energy Resources Inc .” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000611687 USEPA. “Alternate Energy Resources Inc.” RCRAInfo

. 20 January 2006. USEPA. “Site Description Prior to Cleanup: Alternate Energy Resources.” 14 September 2005. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0401411.pdf

. Additional Contacts: Carolyn Callihan (EPA Region 4 , Superfund Remedial Project Manager) , (404) 562

- 8913 Brian Farrier (EPA Region 4 , Superfund Remedial Project Manager), (404) 562

- 8952 Co lleen E. Michuda (EPA Region 4, Associate Regional Counsel ), (404 ) 562

- 9685, michuda.colleen@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Georg ia

113 Site Information: Site Name: Exide Technologies (formerly GNB Technologies, Inc.) EPA ID No.: GAD070330576 Address: 3639 Joy Road, Columbus, GA 31906 County: Muscogee NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and/or Description of Recycling Operation: The Exide site has had historic operations since the 1950s. An old smelter operated on site until the mid

- 90s, and a new smelter was opened in the late 90s. Exide's Battery Recycling Plant recycle s lead in used lead

- acid batteries and various other lead wastes. The process consists of battery breaking, desulfurization, drying, smelting, refining, and casting. In the battery breaking area, the solid lead and lead paste are separated from the plastic casing. The lead paste (primarily lead sulfate) is desulfurized using sodium carbonate to form lead carbonate and sodium sulfate. The lead carbonate is reunited with solid lead and dried in the Rotary Material Dryer. The sodium sulfate is crystallized and sold as a by

- product. The dried lead from the Rotary Material Dryer is stored in bunkers, from which it is charged to the Reverb Furnace for smelting. After smelting, the lead is poured into large kettles where it is refined and cast into ingots. The slag produced by the Reverb Furnace is conveyed to the Rotary Furnace for recovery of remaining lead. The lead from the Rotary Furnace is transferred to the kettles for refining and casting. The sulfuric acid from used batteries is chemically converted to sodium sulfate crystals. The plastic from used battery housings is recovered and sold as plastic chips. The Exide site was also used to manufacture and distribute new batteries. The operations at Exide were considered legitimate; however materials were not managed to minimize loss, a key criterion for recycling legitimacy. This facility is currently in RCRA Corrective Action. The facility was issued a RCRA permit (in March 1988 and April 1998) for storage of the old batteries used in the smelting operation. The smelting facility operated with a recycling exemption from RCRA. Description of Contamination : Improper storage and containment systems for plastic battery casings and lead platelets resulted in significant soil and groundwater co ntamination by lead, chromium and battery acid. Contamination, which occurred after RCRA was in effect, resulted from many aspects of the process besides storage. Trucks bringing the batteries to the site often leaked battery fluids. The battery crackin g operation also resulted in many leaks. Georgia’s Environmental Protection Division fined the company consistently. The estimated closure cost is $8,890,000 and the total cost is approximately $8,089,570.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Georg ia

114 Sources of Information : Georgia Environmental Protection Division. “Facility Information: Exide Technologies.” Georgia Title V Application Warehouse. (n.d.). 20 January 2006. http://airpermit.dnr.state.ga.us/gatv/TitleV.asp Slewin sky, Jim. Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Interview. 21 November 2005. Smith, Mark (Hazardous Waste Management Branch, Georgia Department of Natural Resources). Letter to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste)

. 21 February 2005. USEPA. “Chloride Metals.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0401548 USEPA. “Exide Technologies Incorporated .” Envirof acts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000361359

. USEPA. “Permit Series List.” RCRAInfo

. 20 January 2006. USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Exide Technologies.” RCRAInfo. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=GAD070330576 Contacts: Penny Gaynor (Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Geologist Managing Cleanup ) (404) 656

- 2833 Jim Slewinsky (Georgia Environmental Protection Division) Jim McNamara , (404) 656

- 780 2 Jim Ussery (Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Program Manager, Facilities Compliance Program), (404) 656

- 2833 Dave Yardumian (Unit Manager, Combustion and Treatment Unit 5/24 ), (404) 656

- 2833Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Georg ia

115 Site Information : Site Name: Joe Sikes Oil Service, Inc. EPA ID No.: GAD981262470 Address: 3551 Athens Highway, Jefferson, GA 30549 County: Jackson NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0409809 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Joe Sikes Oil Services is a used oil dealer that collects, bulks, and distributes used motor oil. The facility has 10 oil storage tanks (varying from 2,000 gallon to 18,000 gallon capacity) in one tank farm. A second tank farm contains three diesel tanks for fueling. A third tank farm contains eight tanks for storing coolant water. Two additional tanks containing oily sludge sit in the back of the facility. According to the foreman of Sikes Oil Service, oil has not been processed at the facility since the fall of 1999; however, the facility still rec eives various types of waste oil for storage from industrial (nonautomotive) sources until it can be transported to processing facilities. The facility was granted a solid waste handling permit for storage of municipal solid waste until it is transported off site for disposal. Description of Contamination : Contamination resulted from the transportation of used oil directly connected to recycling practices. At approximately 11:15 PM on June 19, 2005, a tanker truck off

- loading used oil at the facility exploded. The driver was killed instantly and the contents of the tanker truck either burned with the truck or were released to the ground surrounding the facility. The tank purportedly contained used motor oil. The cause of the explosion is unknown. The building sustained significant damage. Approximately 200 to 300 gallons were released to the ground. The spill was contained and cleaned up over a period of five hours by the responsible party, with oversight by EP. The contaminants of concern at thi s facility, based on the nature of operation, are VOCs. At Sikes Oil Service, releases of VOCs to air could have occurred through the following activities: (1) the heating of the oil without the use of, or with faulty, emissions equipment; (2) the storage and transfer of oil products, (3) routine vehicle maintenance, and (4) the storage of solid waste. Sources of Information : EPA Region 4. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). October 2005. Georgia Department of Human Resourc es under a Cooperative Agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. “Petitioned Health Consultation: Sikes Oil Service.” 16 January 2002. 20 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/sikesoil/sos_toc.html USEPA. “Joe Sikes Oil Services.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110001420230Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Georg ia

116 USEPA. “Sikes Oil .” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006

. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0409809 USEPA. “Sikes Oil Services.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.). 20 January 2006. http://www.epaosc.net/site_profile.asp?site_id=1683. Ad ditional Contacts : David Dorian ( USEPA Region 4, On

- Scene Coordinator, Environmental Engineer), (404) 562

- 8767, dorian.david@epa.gov John Kroske (USEPA Region 4, Environmental Engineer), (404) 562

- 8613Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Georg ia

117 Si te Information Site Name: SoGreen Waste Pile, Parramore Fertilizer, Barren Area (contiguous sites) EPA ID No.: GAD984321661 Address: Highland Avenue., Tifton, GA , 31794 County: Tift NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0406099 Site History and Descrip tion of Recycling Operation : SoGreen Waste Pile held a permit for storage of 500 cubic yards of K061 inside of a building. Their primary business was mixing the K061 with six parts of agricultural lime for sale as a micronutrient package. The business declined in 1986, and, in about seven months, the facility had accepted over 60,000 tons of K061 and stored it on the ground in piles up to 30 feet high. Various industrial wastewaters were applied to the pile for dust suppression. Description of Contaminatio n : This site has a known release of cadmium in groundwater at levels exceeding the reportable quantity. No human exposure via drinking water is suspected from this release. The nearest drinking water well is between one and two miles from the area affecte d by the release. Other substances in groundwater include lead, chromium, barium, and mercury. This site, which has unlimited access, has a known release of cadmium in soil at levels exceeding the reportable quantity. The nearest resident individual is between 301 and 1000 feet from the area affected by the release. Other substances on site: lead; chromium; arsenic; barium; beryllium; mercury; silver; selenium; thallium; benzo(a)anthracene; benzo(a)pyrene; benzo(b)fluoranthene; iso(2

- ethylhexyl) phthalate; chrysene; dibenzo(a,h)anthracene; fluoranthene; indeno(1,2,3

- cd)pyrene; phenanthrene; pyrene; acetone; dichloromethane; and tetrachloroethene. Although the recycling was legitimate, the facility accepted too much waste and poor management thereof led to damage. Sources of Information : Georgia Environmental Protection Division. “Site Number 10142 Site Summary: SoGreen Waste Pile.” Hazardous Site Inventory . 1 July 2004. 20 January 2006. http://www.dnr.state.ga.us/environ/gaenviron_files/hazwaste_files/hsi_100

- 199.pdf

. Smith, Mark (Hazardous Waste Management Branch, Georgia Department of Natural Resources). Letter to Dave Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Wa ste)

. 21 February 2005. USEPA. “Parramore Fertilizer.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006 . 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0406099

. USEPA . “Parramore Fertilizer.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009163056

.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Georg ia

118 Additional Contacts : Jim McNamara and Jan Simmons (Georgia Department of Natural Resources) , (404) 656

- 7802Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Idaho

119 Site Information Site Name: P4 Production LLC

- Monsanto EPA ID No.: IDD081830994 Address: Highway 34 North, Soda Springs, ID 83276 County: Caribou NPL Site: Final: 8/30/1990 In CERCLIS Database: 1000213 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Monsanto Soda Springs Plant processes locally mined phosphate ore to produce elemental phosphorus. In 1952, Monsanto purchased the plant site , built the plant, and began operations. The fenced plant consists of more than a dozen administrative and processing buildings plus ore piles, slag piles, by

- product materials, surface impoundments, and a solid

- waste landfill. Recycling operations have i ncluded many process water waste streams and operations continue on the property. It appears that the recyclable materials were not managed to prevent or minimize loss. Description of Contamination : In the past, recycling of the scrubber wastewater from the Bevill exempt nodulizing kiln and entrained, underflow solids, led to extensive groundwater contamination, resulting in an NPL listing. Groundwater underneath the site and the surrounding vicinity is contaminated with cadmium, selenium, fluoride an d nitrate. Management of non

Bevill exempt wastewaters prior to re

- use may also have resulted in groundwater contamination. The solids, some of which are also recycled to the kiln, have high levels of naturally occurring radioactive materials and have res ulted in radionuclide contamination around the plant. Through the 1980s, Monsanto conducted investigations and actions at the site to address many of the known and suspected sources of contamination. In 1987, sampling was conducted as part of a site ins pection , and contamination was found in monitoring and production wells. Investigations into the type and extent of contamination at the site have since been completed. Over the past 30 years, the estimated cost of addressing all the contaminated soils through institutional controls at prices estimated in the f easibility s tudy (FS) is $2,500,000. However, the total cost could be as much as $9,500,000, if the full extent of contaminated soils above the remediation goal in potential residential areas is taken into account through excavation, soil replacement, and containment within the Plant. The estimated cost of the Soil Institutional Control/Groundwater Monitoring alternative in the FS was $400,000 for the initial cost of establishing institutional contro ls and up to $150,000/year for ongoing groundwater monitoring, source/soil monitoring, and dust control. Together these costs add up to a total of $2,500,000 for remediation at the site. Since dust control is required pursuant to the Plant's Idaho permit and is not part of the selected remedy, that cost is not part of the cost of the remedy. However, the cost estimate still seems reasonable, given that the cost of the arbitration which may be needed was not estimated in the FS. The FS cost estimate for the active soil cleanup alternative was $16 million dollars, based on cleanup of 435 acres to meet a 1x10

- 4 cleanup level. Current estimates of the total area to beAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Idaho

120 addressed at the selected 3x 10

- 4 cleanup level , is 250 acres, of which some 25 percent is already owned by Monsanto. Thus , the maximum cost estimate for the soil remedy over 30 years if all soils outside Monsanto's control require active remediation is an additional $7,000,000, for a total cost estimate of $9,500,000. As of September 30, 2004 , total cost expenditures at the site were $944,646.65. Contamination occurred both before and after 1982. Contamination occurred from a variety of sources, some of them not recycling related and the clean up cost, therefore, is not completely related to recycling. Sources of Information: EPA Region 10. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 30 November 2005. USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: P4 Production LLC.” 30 April 1997. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r1097049.pdf USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2006. 13 January 2006. USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: P4 Production LLC.” November 2003. 16 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/nplpad.nsf/88d393e4946e3c478825631200672c95/39dd3205 823cb 6c785256595004b0ea3?OpenDocument USEPA. “P4 Production LLC.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 16 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?f acility_uin=110000743982 USEPA. “ Superfund Site Progress Profile for Monsanto Chemical Co.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006

. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=1000213

Additional Contacts: Sylvia Burges, (206) 553

- 1254 Wally Reid, (206) 553

- 1728Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Illinois

121 Site Information Site Name: Circle Smelting Corporation EPA ID No.: ILD050231976 Address: State Rte 50, Beckemeyer, IL 62231 County: Clinton NPL Site: Proposed: 6/17/1996 In CERCLIS Database: 0500350 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Circle Smelting Corporation facility was originally constructed on a 28 acre parcel of land in 1904 as a primary zinc smelter. In 19 20, it was converted to a secondary smelter recovering zinc and aluminum from scrap metals. A Belgium retort system was used to boil zinc scrap and reclaim pure "Prime Western" grade zinc. The Belgium retort system was discontinued at the facility in the l ate 1960s; smelting operations continued through late 1994. During operations, waste materials were deposited throughout the site, while waste cinders containing lead were used in the Village of Beckemeyer as a surface material for walking paths, driveways , and alleys. Waste material was used over time to fill low

- lying areas on the site including a small, shallow lake that was part of the main operations area. Description of Contamination : Soil and surface water were both contaminated by the site; the area of contaminated soil is approximately 21 million square feet. A 17 acre slag waste pile, up to 15 feet deep in some sections, has high concentrations of zinc, nickel, lead, and cadmium. Residual metals and coal cinders from the smelting process have c ontaminated soils on and off the property and generated air emissions that include metal oxides. Approximately 5,800 feet of forested wetlands north of the site had high levels of zinc resulting from contamination of a nearby creek. Sources of Informati on: EPA Region 5. “Cleanup Work has begun at the Circle Smelting Superfund Site.” April 1999. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region5/sites/circle/circle.pdf Illinois Department of Public Health. “Public Health Assessment: Circle Smelting Corporation.” 25 January 2006. http://www.idph.state.il.us/envhealth/pdf/circle%20smelting%20PHA%20f inal2.pdf USEPA. “ Superfund Site Progress Profile for Circle Smelting Corp.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo .cfm?id=0500350 USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Circle Smelting Corp.” 17 June 1996. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar1475.htm Additional Contacts: Stavros Emm anouil , (312) 886

- 1768 Zenny Sadlon , (312) 886

- 6682Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Illinois

122 Site Information Site Name: Clayton Chemical Company EPA ID No.: ILD066918327 Address: 1 Mobile Avenue, Sauget, IL 62201 County: St. Clair NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 500427 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Clayton Chemical contains a multitude of above ground storage tanks, process units, drum storage buildings, and an office laboratory on the 7.5 acre facility. Prior to 1961, the property was owned by GM&O Rai lroad who operated a roundhouse on the site. In 1961, Clayton Chemical Company leased the facility to recycle and recover solvents and waste oils. On May 12, 1981, the Village of Sauget deeded the site property to the Clayton Chemical Company, whose operations on the site continued until November of 1996. Between 1996 and 1998, the site was operated by the Resource Recovery Group as a waste oil and spent solvents recycling and recovery business. Illinois EPA denied the company a RCRA Part B permit for the site in 1998, halting operations and any further acceptance of hazardous and non

- hazardous wastes. Description of Contamination : An unspecified amount of liquid hazardous and non

- hazardous substances remain on site in the above ground storage tanks and associated piping, 55

- gallon drums, and miscellaneous containers. Lead and PCBs are the primary contaminants of concern both on and off

- site. Sources of Information: USEPA. “Clayton Chem Co.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 16 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0500427 USEPA. “Clayton Chemical Company.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 16 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000612533 USEPA. “Resource Recovery Group Site.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile . (n.d.). 16 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/epaosc USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Resource Recovery.” RCRAInfo. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=ILD066918327 Additional Contacts : Kevin Turner , Turner.Kevin@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Illinois

123 Site Information Site Name: Environmental Waste Resources, Inc. EPA ID No .: ILD087157251 Address: 2390 South Broadway Street & Reed Road, Coal City, IL 60416 County: Grundy NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0500488 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Environmental Waste Resources, Inc. (EWR), a Connecticut corporation, operated this treatment, storage, and recycling facility from 1976 to 1997. During its operation , EWR accepted hazardous and non

- hazardous waste in bulk and container shipments. On July 8, 1997, EWR filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Act (Case No. 97

- 32784). When EWR's bankruptcy proceeding converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding on February 3, 1998, EWR abandoned the site, including hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants. The waste remained on the site in deteriorating drums, and bulk tanks. The waste contained elevated concentrations of some volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as well as lower concentrations of other VOCs and semi volatile organic compounds (SVOCs). In addition, approximately 40 compres sed gas cylinders, many containing flammable gases, were left in outdoor areas of the site. Numerous laboratory chemicals including, concentrated acids, bases, flammables, oxidizers, poisons, and radioactive material were left in an onsite laboratory building. Description of Contamination : Site abandonment as a result of the company’s bankruptcy claim led to significant environmental damage. Shortly after EWR filed for bankruptcy , the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) conducted a site inve s tigation and referred it to US EPA for resp onse actions. US EPA conducted an emergency site assessment which identified 831 full drums containing both hazardous and non

- hazardous waste; several hundred empty and partially full drums stored in three semi

- trai lers; 23 aboveground tanks in outdoor tank farms, most full to capacity of 10,000 to 50,000 gallons each; 4 aboveground tanks in the process building; 29 compressed gas cylinders; and a variety of laboratory chemicals. The inspections also revealed numerous wastewater violations, including discharges into the municipal sewer system containing copper, lead, chromium, cyanide, nickel, oil and grease, tin, zinc, cadmium , and other chemicals in excess of limits established in EWR's Wastewater Discharge Permit. As of September 2004, cleanup expenditures at this site total $260,768.89. Sources of Information: USEPA. “Environmental Waste Resources .” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006

. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0500488 USEPA. “ RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Environmental Waste Resources, Inc.” RCRAInfo

. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=ILD087157251Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Illinois

124 USEPA. “Environmental Waste Resources Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000912932 USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2006. 16 January 2006. Additional Contacts: Stavros Emmanouil , (312) 886

- 1768Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Illinois

125 Site Information Site Name: Hydromet Environmental USA Incorporated EPA ID No.: ILD984766279 Address: 2475 East US Highway 36, Newman, IL 61942

- 2037 County: Douglas NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Hydromet Environmental (USA) Inc. (Hydromet) is a hazardous waste reclamation company. Five of its former company officials have been indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly hiding piles of toxic sludge and pretending it had been processed properly. The indictment claims Hydromet and the five key employees engaged in a criminal conspiracy to illegally transport, store , and dispose of hazardous wastes at its Newman facility in Douglas County from 1999 through February 2003. In addition to Hydromet, those charged include: William A. Morgan, former chairman of the board and chief executive officer; John E. Pugh, former plant manager; Julianna H. Bauter, former environmental compliance official; Douglas Bennett, former chemist; and Ronald I. Martin, former warehouse supervisor. According to the indictments, Hydromet's Newman facility was unsuccessful from the outset because it did not have any viable processes for reclaiming metals from some 3.8 mil lion tons of hazardous wastes it accepted for processing between 1995 and 1998. The company suffered severe financial setbacks and shutdown in January 1998, leaving tons of dangerous wastes containing poisons like cyanide, arsenic, lead , and cadmium stored in on

- site tanks. The state of Illinois began enforcement action against Hydromet that resulted in an injunction in May, 1999, requiring the company to process the materials correctly or dispose of them at a permitted site by May 31, 1999. Rodger A. Heaton, United States Attorney for the Central District of Illinois, claims the defendants illegally shipped the wastes to a rundown warehouse in East Chicago, Ind. , and also hid them on site at their Newman plant to try and convince the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency that it was complying with the court injunction. Heaton also alleges the defendants used false documentation to ship the waste to a non

- hazardous landfill in Indianapolis. Heaton claims the aim was to win permission to start up operatio ns again, and the company was given permission to do so in November of 2002. If convicted, each defendant could face up to five years in prison on each count , as well as a fine of up to $50,000 per day of violation or $250,000, whichever is higher. The c ase has been investigated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's CriminalAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Illinois

126 Investigation Division, the Illinois EPA and the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Description of Contamination : The company shut down in 1998 , leaving tons of dangerous wastes containing poisons like cyanide, arsenic, lead and cadmium stored in on

- site tanks. Sources of Information: Herald & Review. “Federal charges filed against Newman firm for hiding piles of toxic Sludge.” 23 January 2006. 15 February 2006. http://www.herald

- review.com/articles/2006/01/25/news/state/1012625.txt Region 5

- Regional Counsel. “Enforcement Action Summary FY 2006

- January.” 6 February 2006 . 15 February 2006. USEPA. “Hydromet Environmental USA Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse

. (n.d.) 15 February 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2. get_list?facility_uin=110000772343 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Hydromet Environmental Inc.” RCRAInfo . 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=ILD984766279Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Illinois

127 S ite Information Site Name: J Pitt Melt Shop EPA ID No.: ILN000508169 Address: 3151 S. California, Chicago, IL 60608 County: Cook NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0508169 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: In 1918, the owner of the site, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRDGC) leased the property for 99 years. The lease was subsequently assigned to California Auto Reclamation Co., a majority of which is owned by M S Kaplan Company. Kaplan has been subleasing the property to various companies that process steel billet and blooms from scrap steel. The most recent company on the site, J Pitt Steel, c eased operations in 1996 and its parent company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1997. Description of Contamination : On April 5, 2001, the City of Chicago Department of Environment (CDE) discovered abandoned artillery shells and observed oil releasing from the site into the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal. CDE referred the site to USEPA, and received the assistance of the U.S. Army to address the munitions. Subsequent USEPA assessment activities determined that hazardous materials had contaminated the s ite including, up to 54,000 ppm polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); electric arc furnace dust (K061); lead, chromium, and cadmium dust and ash; drums and containers with acids, caustics, and solvents; cesium

- 137 in mold level control devices ; and friable asb estos. On April 10, 2001, Kaplan and the MWRDGC stated that they would perform the work and pay for all site cleanup costs under an A dministrative Order of C onsent to be negotiated with the USEPA. Sources of Information: USEPA. “J Pitt Melt Shop.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 16 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0508169 USEPA. “J. Pitt Melt Shop.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110006819416 USEPA Region 5

– Regional Council. “Enforcement Action Summary FY 2001 I

- L.” http://www.epa.gov/region5/orc/enfactions/enfactions2001/name

- itol.htm Additional Contacts: Brad Benning (OSC) , (312) 353

- 7613 Stuart P. Hersh (Multi

- Media Branch I) , (312) 886

- 6235Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Illinois

128 Site Information Site Name: R. Lavin and Sons EPA ID No.: CERCLIS : ILN000508448 RCRA Info and CERCLIS : ILD097271563 Address: 2028 S. Sheridan Road, North Chicago, IL 60064 County: Lake NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0508448 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The site has operated as a secondary brass smelter since 1941 . It comprises approximately 17.5 acres s urrounded by residential and commercial land

- uses. A variety of copper and brass scraps were imported from off

- site sources, melted and refined, poured into ingots, and shipped to customers. The facility has been upgraded several times in response to enforcement actions by the state of Illinois including, installation of several baghouses, improvement of a closed

- loop, cooling water recirculating system, and implementation of surface run

- off containment and control measures. Description of Contamination : Areas of concern on site include three open top storage tanks, two retention ponds, process water pit , and numerous baghouses that contain elevated levels of lead, cadmium, copper and zinc. State studies have indicated significant downstream contaminatio n of Pettibone Creek with copper, lead , and zinc. Releases of contaminants to the storm sewer as a result of recycling operations have been and continue to be an ongoing problem at this site. Sources of Information : USEPA. “R Lavin and Sons.” CERCLIS

. 12 October 200 6

. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0508448 USEPA. “R Lavin and Sons.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 16 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000429812 USEPA. “R Lavin and Sons.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.) 16 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/RLAVIN USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for R. Lavin and Sons.” RCRAInfo . 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=ILD097271563#List%2 0of%20Cleanup%20Activities

Additional Contacts : Bradley Benning, benning.bradley@epa.gov Cynthia Kawakami, kawakami.cynthia@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Indiana

129 Site Information Site Name: Amacor Residential/Amacor Magnesium Fire EPA ID No.: INN000509963/INN000509962 Address: 1820 E 32 nd Street, Anderson, IN 46013 County: Madison NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0509962/0509963 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : AMACOR (Advanced Magnesium Alloy Corporation) is a magnesium recycling facility occupying approximately 5 acres, enclosed within a 6

- foot chain link fence topped with barbed wire. The site contains three buildings (A, B, and C) where separate steps of the recycling process occur. Description of Contamination : Approximately 300,000 pounds of magnesium at the facility caught fire on January 14, 2005 and continued to burn for approximately 48 hours. The fire and smoke acted as a propellant for encapsulated asbestos insulation located atop a rubber membrane roofing material used in the facility buildings, built around 1969. As a precaution, a 1

- mile radius around the AMACOR facility was evacuated, involving 5,000 to 8,000 residents. Asbestos removal activities on affected residential areas in Anderson, Indiana have been taking place since the fire. As bestos has been detected in some debris that fell in the neighborhood south and southwest of the facility. Sources of Information: EPA Region 5. “Cleanup Work after Amacor Fire.” March 2005. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region5/sites/amacor/amacor

- 200503.pdf EPA Region 5

– Cleanup Sites. “Amacor Magnesium Fire.” 11 January 2006. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region5/sites/amacor/index.htm USEPA. “Amacor Magnesium Fire.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 25 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0509962 USEPA. “Amacor Magnesium Fire.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110022533070
U SEPA. “Amacor Residential.” CERCLIS

. 12 October 2006

. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0509963 USEPA. “Amacor Residential.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110022533089 USEPA. “Amacor Residential.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.). 25 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/AMACORRESIDENTIALAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Indiana

130 Additional Contacts: Joe Muñoz (CIC) , 312

- 886

- 7935 or 800

- 621

- 8431, ext. 67935 , munoz.joe@epa.gov Ken Rhame (OSC) , 312

- 353

- 6720 , rhame.kenneth@epa.gov Tim Johnson (State Project Manager

- IDEM) , (317) 232

- 3220 , tjohnson@idem.in.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Indiana

131 Site Information Site Name: Continental Steel Corp. EPA ID No.: IND0012135 03 Address: W Markland Ave., Kokomo, IN 46902 County: Howard NPL Site: Final: 3/31/89 In CERCLIS Database: 0501228 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Since 1896, manufacturing processes and products on the site have varied, but for much of its recent history , Continental Steel Corp. manufactured rods and wire products from low

- and high

- carbon steel recycled from steel scrap. The site is located in a mixed residential, commercial, and industrial area, zoned for general use. The facility is divided into six operable units, consisting of an abandoned steel manufacturing facility (Main Plant), pickling liquor treatment lagoons (Lagoon Area), a former waste disposal area (Markland Avenue Quarry), a former waste disposal and slag processing area (Slag Processing Area), onsite creeks, and the groundwater under the site The facility reprocessed scrap metal into nails, wire, and wire fencing using reheating, casting, rolling, drawing, pickling, galvanizing, tinning, and tempering proce sses. Waste pickle liquor resulting from these operations was collected in a 10

- acre, 20

- million

- gallon surface impoundment constructed in 1946. The contents were processed through a neutralization system and discharged to Wildcat Creek. Continental Ste el filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Federal bankruptcy code on November 25, 1985, and ceased operations on February 21, 1986. The bankruptcy was converted to Chapter 7 on February 25, 1986. The facility acquired Interim Status under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) when the owner filed a Notification of Hazardous Waste Activity and Part A of a permit application. Description of Contamination : In 1984, 1985, and 1986, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management identified chromium, cadmium, lead, and iron, constituents known to be in the impoundment, in on

- site ground water. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and metals associated with the recycling activity were found in the groundwater, soil, sludges , and sediments around the site following the company’s bankruptcy. The Lagoon Area was proposed for inclusion on the National Priorities List (NPL) in June 1988, and formally place d on the NPL in March 1989. The Markland Avenue Quarry and the Main Plant were proposed for aggregation to the site, and were added in May 1990. In response to a State report of contaminated runoff being released from the drum storage area i n the Markland Quarry, US EPA initiated a removal action in February 1990. This action involved construction of a trench, soil sampling, offsite disposal of 800 cubic yards of soil from the quarryAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Indiana

132 area and 220 drums. USEPA also removed drums and storage tanks from the qu arry pond between June 1991 and August 1991. As a result of a site assessment of the Continental Steel facility itself, initiated in March 1990, U SEPA arranged for the disposal of about a thousand empty, crushed drums, about 200 drums of product material, about 50 containers of lead cadmium batteries, and about 5,000 gallons of base

- neutral liquids. The entire site, including all six operable units , is now listed on the NPL. Two Records of Decision (RODs) were signed in 1996 and 1998 respectively, outlining interim and final decontamination plans for the entire site. However, a ROD Amendment, signed in September 2003, incorporated new information gathered from predesign i nvestigations performed by US EPA in 2000

- 2001 and a five

- year review performed by the state in 2002 which estimate the cost of remedy at $61 million dollars. This figure may be revised downward if a proposed redesign to the Lagoon Area remedy plan is approved by US EPA. For FY 2005, US EPA provide d $3 million to begin construction of sediment dewatering and drying beds at the Lagoon Area and construction is expected to begin soon. Sources of Information: USEPA. “ Continental Steel.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 16 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0501228 USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Continental Steel Corp.” 16 August 1996. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0596310.pdf USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Continental Steel Corp.” 30 September 1998. 16 January 2006. http ://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0598091.pdf USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Continental Steel Corp.” June 2005. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5/superfund/npl/indiana/IND001213503.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Continental Steel Corp.” 24 June 1988. 16 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0501228.pdf Addition al Contacts : Samuel Borries (OSC) , (312) 353

- 8360 Ross Del Rosario (RPM) , (312) 886

- 6195 David Ellison (OSC) Mike Joyce (CIC) , (312) 886

- 0269 Thomas Krueger, Region 5Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Indiana

133 Site Information Site Name: Crawfordsville Scrap and Salvage EPA ID No.: IND065548703 Address: 419 N. Green St., Crawfordsville, IN 47933 County: Montgomery NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0501483 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Crawsfordsville Scrap and Salvage is now participating in Indiana Department of Environmental Management’s (IDEM’s) Voluntary Remediation Program. CSX Transportation (the Responsible Party) has conducted a site characterization and has submitted an ecological risk assessment to determine potential impacts of site contaminants to Shelley Ditch. Description of Contamination : The site is contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs ) and lead found in the soil and surface water. Sources of Information: Indiana Department of Environmental Management. “Hazardous Waste Response Site s: Crawfordsville Scrap and Salvage.” 30 May 2006. 20 October 2006. http://www.in.gov/idem/programs/land/statecleanup/sitesummaries/crawfordsville.html USEPA. “ Crawfordsville Scrap and Salvage.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 16 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0501483 USEPA. “Crawfordsville Scrap and Salvage.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009284522 Additional Contacts: Richard Harris , (317) 233

- 8284Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Indiana

134 Site Information Site Name: David John Property EPA ID No.: Address: South end Vandalia Street on commercial lot, Otterbein, IN County: Benton NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The property owner, Mr. David John, operated a drum recycling operatio n at the site for approximately 20 years. On December 1, 2000, while conducting a spill incident investigation, Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) discovered between 30 to 40 empty drums and soils discolored by paint sludge through out the property. During the incident investigation, Mr. John acknowledged that the residual fluids contained in the drums were dumped onto the ground. Description of Contamination : On December 5, 2000, a remedial investigation was conducted and revealed elevated concentrations of volatile organic compounds in both the subsurface soils and groundwater beneath the property. Sources of Information: Indiana Department of Environmental Management. “Hazardous Waste Response Sites: David John Property.” Oc tober 2001 . 16 January 2006. http://www.in.gov/idem/programs/land/statecleanup/sitesummaries/davidjohn.pdf Additional Contacts: Aaron Green , (317) 234

- 0350Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Indiana

135 Site Information Site Name: Hassan Barrel Company EPA ID No.: INN000509942 Address: 1605 Summer Street, Ft. Wayne, IN 46803 County: Allen NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 509942 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : In1954, drum re cycling operations on the 7

- acre site began in a primarily residential area. The final owner of the recycling facility, Mr. Allen Hersch , totally abandoned the site in July, 2003. Description of Contamination : On October 6, 2004, Northern Indiana Public Service Company entered the site to inspect gas meters due to nonpayment and observed numerous drums stacked throughout the property. Allen County officials were notified and the Indiana Department of Environmental Manag ement (ID EM) has worked with the US EPA to remove approximately 12,000 drums from the site. Sources of Information: USEPA. “Hassan Barrel Company.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.) 16 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/HassanBarrel USEPA. “Hassan Barrel Site.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 16 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0509942 USEPA. “Hassan Barrel Site.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 16 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110003084162 Additio nal Contacts: William Simes (OSC) , simes.william@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Indiana

136 Site Information Site Name: Hayes Lemmerz International Inc. EPA ID No.: IND980904528 Address: 1870 Riverford Drive, Huntington, IN 46750 County: Huntington NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Recycling activities at this facility involved reprocessing aluminum scraps and chips created when wheel castings are machined. The scrap metals are dried before being sent to a furnace for re

- melting, creating a fine aluminum dust. This byproduct dust was conveyed into a dust collector just outside the building. Description of Contamination : An explosion and fire at the Hayes Lemmerz International facility occurred on Oct. 29, 2003, causing fatal burns to a mechanic working near an aluminum melt furnace, injuring a second mechanic nearby, and causing lesser burns to a third worker. Four other workers suffered minor injuries. An October 5, 2005 report by the US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board found the fire was caused by a fine powdered aluminum dust that had accumulated in the dust collection system from inadequate housekeeping in the foundry area and insufficient maintenance of chip processing equipment. Dust collector filters were infrequently cleaned, some eroded ducts leaked dust, maintenance workers were not wearing flame

- retardant clothing, and the company did not have formal written maintenance procedures or employee training in place for the dust collector system. In addition, the company failed to address why the chip drying system was releasing excess dust, and did not identify or address the dangers of aluminum dust ignition, despite having a history of small dust fires inside the factory. Sources of Information: Indiana Department of Air Pollution Control

– Permit Records. “Hayes

- Lemmerz International.” 29 June 2005. 16 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r5/in_permt.nsf/0/34d98faae9f10be68625702f00715f77?OpenDo cument US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Information Report. "Hayes Lemmerz Dust Explosions and Fire." 29 October 2003. 25 January 2006. http://www.csb.gov/index.cfm?folder=current_investigations&page=info&INV_ID=44 USEPA. “Hayes Lemmerz International Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 16 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110001235752 Additional Contacts: Janet Mobley , (317) 232

- 8369 , jmobley@dem.state.in.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Indiana

137 Site Information Site Name: Heritage Environmental Services EPA ID No.: IND093219012 Address: 7901 W. Morris St., Indianapolis, IN 46231 County: Marion NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Heritage Environmental Services was founded in 1970 as Industrial Liquid Waste Disposal in Columbus, Indiana. The first processing facility was designed to reclaim waste oils to produce a fuel that could be burned in the company's hot mix asphalt plants. In the early 1970s, the plant added additional capabilities and facilities to meet the business’s demand. The expansion included treatment of hazardous and non - hazardous wastes from several industrial, individual and government customers. Heritage Environmental Services continues to recycle waste materials, which are then shipped for use as fuel in the company’s cement kilns and other permitted facilities. Hazardous wastes that cannot be fuel blended are collected and shipped to other facilities that can store or treat these wastes. In 1989, Heritage reported that one of its leachate collection tanks had overflowed into underlying and adjacent soils. Heritage received a RCRA Part B permit in March 1993; however, the permit has since expired. Description of Contamination : In October 2002, Heritage Environmental Services LLC entered a consent decree agreeing to pay a penalty of $360,000 to the United States for violations of S ection 113(b) of the Clean Air Act and RCRA. A complaint was filed in connection wi th two of Heritage's hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities located in Indianapolis, Indiana and Lemont, Illinois. Sources of Information: EPA Region 5. “Finding of Violation.” 18 June 1999. 16 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r5/ardcorre.nsf/0/c79dad6e32bdac1f8625679e006ced7e/$FILE/H eritFOV.pdf
EPA Region 5. “Statement of Basis/Final Decision and Response to Comment S ummary: Heritage Environmental Services.” 23 January 1995. 25 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/ca/sbs2/pdfs/in3890.pdf USEPA. “Heritage Environmental.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 16 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000397393 USEPA. “ILWD.” CERCLIS . 12 October 20 06. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0501553Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Indiana

138 USEPA. “ RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Heritage Environmental Service s.” 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=IND093219012 USEPA. “Heritage Environmental Services.” RCRAInfo

. 15 September 2005. 20 January 2006. Additional Contacts: Mike Karpinski, (Quality Manager, Heritage Environmental Services ), (317) 486

- 2785Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Iowa

139 Site Information: Site Name: Moreco Energy, Inc. EPA ID No.: IA0001993799 Address: 0.5 miles W of 350th Ave & 260th St, Dewitt, IA 52742 County: Clinton NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0703085 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Pierce Waste Oil facility began operations in 1932 collecting, storing, and recycling used oil and petrol eum refinery wastes. MORECO Energy, Inc. purchased the facility in the 1980s and continued operations until the Illinois EPA (IEPA) sealed the site on August 16, 1989, due to numerous RCRA and permit violations. USEPA reports that the site was abandoned with the machinery still runnin g . As a result of enforcement action, a Consent Order between IEPA and MORECO was entered into in April 1991 (No. 91

- CH

- 265). After entering into the Order, MORECO declared bankruptcy, and the Springfield facility and MOREC O facilities in Oakwood and Rock Island were abandoned. Description of Contamination : The site featured numerous above ground storage tanks, drums , and exposed wastes at the Springfield site. Also, it was reported that the neighboring property, approx imately 100 feet away, observed oil seeping into an area that was being excavated for the installation of footings for a new conveyor belt. Nearly 60 percent of this 5

- acre site is covered in oil. Subsurface contamination at the site continues to exist. Soon after the USEPA completed testing o f the aboveground hazards, 14 test pits were dug throughout the site. A number of the test pits indicated free product (oil), some as much as 1

- foot thick. Analytical results indicated semi

- volatiles and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs ) in the soils and groundwater collected from the pits. USEPA suspects that as it neared its end, MORECO was accepting a wide variety of wastes , including lab chemicals. Analytical results in 1999 indicated that volatile, semi

- volatile , and metal contamination still remains in the groundwater. The IEPA continue s to restrict access to the site, but n o further cleanup actions have been conducted since the USEPA removal in 1993. The current owner uses the site for truck storage. Sources of Information: DeYong, Maura E. “Public Health Assessment and Risk Assessment for MORECO, Inc. Site Springfield Illinois.” University of Illinois at Springfield Thesis. USEPA. “Moreco Energy Company.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0703085 USEPA. “Moreco Energy Company.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/en viro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009278904 Additional Contacts: Greg Dunn, (217) 785

- 2359Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Louisiana

140 Site Information Site Name: Delatte Metals EPA ID No.: LAD052510344 Address: 1541 Weinberger Road, Ponchatoula, LA 70454 County: Tangipahoa Parish NPL Site: Deleted: 8/8/2005 In CERCLIS Database: 0600428 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The Delatte Metals superfund site encompasses both the former Delatte Metals facility and the inactive Ponchatoula Battery Company. The two faci lities total 56.8 acres and are aggregated because they are adjacent, performed identical lead salvage operations, and generated the same type of waste material. The only difference in operational procedures was that Delatte Metals operated a lead smelter to recover additional lead material. Delatte Metals operated from the early 1970s until the 1980s. The operations performed at the facilities included recycling spent lead

- acid batteries to remove and smelt the associated lead plates to produce lead in gots. The typical process at the facility involved sawing off the tops of the batteries and removing the lead plates in a battery saw building. After opening the battery cases, the battery acid was drained into a sump. During the 1980s, acid was pumped from the sump to an unlined pond located on the north side of the site. After the closure of the acid pond, the acid was pumped through an underground pipe to the acid tank farm onsite. The spent acid was then shipped offsite for recycling. The recovered l ead from the acid was sold to lead recycling facilities located throughout the southern United States and other countries. The facilities were issued several Notice of Violations and Compliance Orders during their operational life, as state and USEPA inspe ctions showed discharges with a pH range from 0.55 to 2. The Joyce Wildlife Management Area is located 1.4 miles downstream, and the Manchac Wildlife Management Area is located 12.5 miles downstream. Wetlands were also identified in the 15

- mile downstream target distance limit. Nine sources were evaluated at the Delatte Metals site during the HRS investigation: two battery chip piles, two slag piles, a waste pile, a buried/backfilled surface impoundment, tote bags, a contaminated soil area (former removal area), and the settling tank basin. Analytical samples collected from on

- site soils, piles, and the tote bags indicated the presence of heavy metals including arsenic, lead, and cadmium. Analytical results obtained from ground water samples collected fro m monitoring wells around the surface impoundment indicated the presence of arsenic, cadmium, and lead at concentrations that met observed release criteria. This facility did not hold a RCRA permit.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Louisiana

141 Description of Contamination: Battery casings were dis carded on site, and investigations revealed two battery chip piles, two slag piles, a waste pile, a buried surface impoundment, and a settling tank basin. Drainage from the facility went through a series of ditches to Selser’s Creek. During the mid 1980s and 1990s, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) worked with the both facilities in attempts to correct site deficiencies in environmental practices, though both companies have since gone bankrupt. In September 1997, Louisiana Governor Mike Foster formally requested that the Delatte Metals site be addressed by USEPA and listed on the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). In September 1998, EPA Region 6 began a removal action at the Delatte Metals facility. The removal activities consis ted of removing above ground wastes at the Delatte Metals facility, which included piles of slag, dust, and battery chips. Other identified source areas removed from the Delatte Metals facility included the acid tank farm, furnace building, drums of metal

- contaminated waste, and tote bags of baghouse dust. The total volume of waste treated and disposed was 85,444 tons. This represents an increase of 32,794 tons over the estimated 52,650 tons presented in the September 26, 2000, Record of Decision (ROD). The final remedial action cost of $13.1 million is an increase of $3.2 million over the ROD estimate of $9.9 million. Sources of Information: Gibson, Kathy (214) 665

- 7196, Interview. 7 December 2005. USEPA. “Delatte Industries, Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000613738 USEPA. “Delatte Metals.” RCRAInfo . 2 September 2000. 20 January 2006. USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Delatte Metals.” 26 September 2000. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0600514.pdf USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 17 January 2006. USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Delatte Metals.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0600428 Additional Contacts: Kathy Gibson (RPM) (214) 665

- 7196 Katrina Higgins (RPM) (214) 665

- 8143 Jon Rinehart (RPM) (214) 665

- 8575 Rosemary Vazquez (CIC) (214) 665

- 8575Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Louisiana

142 Site Information Site Name: Marine Shale Processors EPA ID No.: LAD981057706 Address: Route 5, Box 756, Amelia, LA 70340 County: St. Mary NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0604037 Site History and Description of Recycling Ope ration: Marine Shale Processors, Inc. (MSP), located in Morgan City, was permitted by the state of Louisiana in 1985 to process non

hazardous oilfield wastes. The company then began to burn hundreds of different hazardous wastes, and attempted to sell the metal

- laden residue as fill material to the public for $1 per ton. In 1990, the federal government and the state of Louisiana sued MSP over whether the company could distribute its combustion residue as a recycled product. The federal and state governments alleged that MSP’s recycling claim was a sham, and that the facility had no permit to treat hazardous waste. They also alleged that Marine Shale violated federal clean air and clean water laws, as well as hazardous waste regulations. After a string o f rulings by the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upholding the federal government's arguments, the USEPA shut down Marine Shale's Morgan City incinerator. MSP processes solid and hazardous wastes to produce aggregate for sale. The aggregate has been u sed in construction as a road cover and as a fill material. On

- site buildings onsite house administrative, maintenance, laboratory, and process control functions. Other portions of the facility are used for waste material handling, storage, and preparation for feeding to the process kiln. Process aggregate is also stored on site. MSP has operated at its current location since 1985. MSP burns solid and hazardous materials and pumpable high BTU (high heat value) liquids to produce a residue. That residue can be sold as is if certain criteria are met, or it can be further processed at high temperatures to produce a slagged (molten) aggregate. Solid and hazardous materials fed to the process kiln are weighed and screened before being emptied and mixed in the hol ding feed tanks. About 10 percent of incoming feed materials are sampled to verify their shipping manifests. Incoming shipments are screened for gamma radiation. Shipping containers are shredded and processed in the kiln. All process residue and slagged aggregate is chemically analyzed by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) procedure before being released for sale. If the residue or slagged aggregate exceeds 80 percent of the USEPA TCLP standards, it is reprocessed in the slagging furnace . Fly ash, captured by the plant's air pollution control devices, is also processed with aggregate in the slagging furnace. The primary combustion chamber used in the process is a 275

- foot

- long rotary kiln furnace operated at a minimum of 1,600o F. According to MSP, the flue gas remains in the chamber for 9 seconds. Combustion products from the rotary kiln are further reacted in two "oxidizer sections" or afterburners. The slagging furnace is located between the oxidizers and is operated at 2300o F to 27 00o F. The flue gas residence time of the oxidizers is about 10 to 12 seconds. From the oxidizers, the hot exhaust gasses pass through a wet quench system to cool them before gas cleaning. After cooling, dry powdered hydrated lime is sprayed into the gas s tream to neutralizeAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Louisiana

143 acid gases produced during the combustion process. Finally, the exhaust gases are passed through fabric filters (baghouses) before release to the environment. MSP reports the combustion system has a number of safeguards intended to mini mize the severity and duration of process breakdown conditions. Those conditions could disturb the balance of combustion reactions and ultimately lead to excessive air emissions from the process stack. Automatic waste feed shutoff (AWFSO) devices are used in conjunction with the monitoring of critical operating temperatures, pressures, and exhaust gas quality. If such operating conditions exceed or fall below acceptable limits, waste feed to the kiln is automatically stopped by the AWFSO/feed interlock. A related safeguard is the continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS). Monitored parameters include hydrogen chloride (HCl), sulfur dioxide, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and argon. There are also provisions for monitoring carbon monoxide and total hydrocarbons

. A RCRA permit was issued to GTX in February 1999. Description of Contamination: On September 12, 1997 MSP agreed to pay more than $10 million to settle federal and state allegations that it incinerated hazardous waste without a permit and planned to sell the contaminated ash as fill material to the public. A second company, GTX Inc., is spending $25 million to buy and upgrade the incinerator, and clean up the contaminated ash that remains in Morgan City, near the central coast of Louisiana. As part of the agreement, GTX Inc., will purchase MSP’s incinerator and clean up about 350,000 tons of contaminated ash remaining in Morgan City, at an estimated cost of $15 million. GTX will be allowed to reopen the facility as long as it obtains all of the environmental permits required to operate a hazardous waste incinerator. GTX also will invest $10 million to upgrade the plant's pollution control equipment, which will result in cleaner air and water in the area. Once GTX reopens the incinerator, it will bring all of the combustion ash it produces to a new state

- of

- the

- art disposal facility. The settlement barred the former owners of MSP, who are part owners of GTX, from controlling the new company or having any control over operation of the incinerator. M SP’s former top managers also are prohibited from participating in any environmental compliance or permitting matters. Sources of Information: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. "Petitioned Public Health Assessment, Marin e Shale Processors, Inc. Amelia, St. Mary Parish, Louisiana." 17 October 1994. 20 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/marinesp/msp_toc.html US Department of Justice. "US, Louisiana secure $35 million settlement with two companies to clean up hazardous waste and reopen incinerator." 12 September 1997. 20 January 2006. http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/1997 /September97/379enr.html USEPA. “GTX, Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110 000700563 USEPA. “GTX Inc.” RCRA Info. 2 September 2000. 18 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Louisiana

144 USEPA. "Marine Shale Processors." CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 25 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa. gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0604037 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for GTX Inc.” 6 June 2006. 24 October 2006. http://oaspub.ep a.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=LAD981057706 Additional Contacts: Philip Ofosu (SAM) (214) 665

- 3178 Jon Rinehart (SAM) (214) 665

- 6789 Susan Webster (OSC) (214) 665

- 6784Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Maryland

145 Site Information Site Name: American Recovery Corp., Inc. EPA ID No.: MDD074923392 (formally MDD980552301) Address: 1901 Birch St., Baltimore, MD 21226

- 1410 County: Baltimore NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : From 1932 until 1970, industrial chemical m anufacturing operations operated on this property. From 1970 to 1984, American Recovery Corp (ARC), who leased the property from its owner, operated a hazardous waste recycling, treatment, and storage facility. During the operating period of this facility, ARC performed several general cleanups and partial closure activities. In 1984, in response to repeated violations, the State of Maryland revoked the facility’s permit and required the facility to cease operations and submit closure plans. ARC conducted f inal closure activities during 1985 and 1986. In 1988, the State and ARC signed a Consent Order, which established guidelines for post

closure activities including corrective action. Post

- closure monitoring and corrective action investigations were conducted to confirm that closure removed the active sources of contamination. After 1986, the site owner leased the property for several years for use as a junk yard and for other industrial activities. As of 1999, the site was cleared of most of the junk yard m aterial and is now vacant. This site did not hold a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : Groundwater sampling has detected several volatile organic constituents above drinking water standards including: benzene, methylene chloride, chloroform, trichloroethene, tetrachloroethene, 1,1

- dichloroethene, 1,1

- dichloroethane, cis

- 1,2,

- dichloroethene, 1,1,1

- trichloroethane, and vinyl chloride. Also detected were several inorganics including: cadmium, chromium, cobalt, manganese, nickel, and vanadium. The plumes appear to extend offsite. Groundwater in this area is not currently used as a drinking water supply. In the fall of 2001, ARC began implementing a phased program to confirm the extent of groundwater contamination and determine whether there are continuing sources of contaminants. Two phases of field investigation resulted in the installation and sampling of piezometers, a passive soil gas study, several soil samples, sediment samples, and surface water sampling. This work identified two potential source areas for the groundwater contamination identified at the site. In May 2003, ARC’s parent company, Outsourcing Solutions, filed for bankruptcy. As a result, Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) obtained access to financial assurance funds that were established under a State RCRA Closure Order. MDE is using the funds to direct a contractor to complete the investigation and USEPA is providing technical assistance in this endeavor. In the summer of 2004, MDE installed eight shallow groundwater monitoring wells, four deeper groundwater monitoring wells, and collected soil and groundwater samples from the two suspected source areas. These field activities confirmed the general location of two sourceAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Maryland

146 areas. In 2005, MDE performed additional charac terization of these source areas to determine appropriate remedy options. Sources of Information: EPA Region 3. “Region 3 GPRA Baseline RCRA Corrective Action Facility: American Recovery Company, Inc.” 14 July 2005. 20 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/ca/md/pdf/mdd074923392.pdf USEPA. “American Recovery Company Incorporated.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0300280 USEPA. “American Recovery Company Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse

. (n.d.) 20 February 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000913254 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for American Recovery Company Incorporated.” RCRAInfo . 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=MDD074923392 Additional Contacts : Deborah Goldblum (USEPA

– Region 3) (215) 814

- 3432, goldblum.deborah@epa.gov Art O’Connell (Maryland Department of the Environment) (410) 537

- 3400, aoconnell@mde.state.md.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Maryland

147 Site Information Site Name: Boulden Incorporated EPA ID No.: MDD9805501 98 Address: 895 Nottingham Road, Elkton, MD 21921 County: Cecil NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Boulden Incorporated operated a small

scale parts cleaning and solvent recovery business at the site. The site consisted of aboveground and underground storage tanks, storage space, and a distillation building with solvent distillation equipment. Contamination resulted from the storage of recycled solvents at the site prior to 1998. The business shut down in the early 1990s. The facility had a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : In 1994, due to contamination of on

- site soils, Boulden signed a consent order with EPA Region 3 for RCRA Corrective Action and closure of the facility. Cleanup actions performed at Boulden consisted of: removal of all above ground storage tanks, distillation building, and associated equipment; excavation and closure of two underground storage tanks; removal of all contaminated soil; and soil and groundwater samp ling. Sources of Information: EPA Region 3

- RCRA Baseline Facilities. “Boulden Incorporated.” (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/ca/md/pdf/mdd980550198.pdf
Martinez, Wanda (Project Manager) (215) 814

- 3434, Interview. 16 November 2005. USEPA. “Boulden Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://oaspub .epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000907724 USEPA. “Boulden Incorporated.” RCRAInfo . 12 January 2005. 20 January 2006. USEPA. “ RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Boulden Inc.” 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=MDD980550198 Additional Contacts: Wanda Martinez, EPA Region 3 Project Manager, (215) 814

- 3434, martinez.wanda@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Maryland

148 Site Information: Site Name: Safety Kleen Corporation 2 058 011 EPA ID No.: MDD000737395 Address: 12164 Tech Road, Silver Spring, MD 20904 County: Montgomery NPL Site: No In CERCLIS D atabase: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Safety Kleen Silver Spring Maryland Service Center operated on the site from 1982 until August, 1996. The former service center consisted of approximately 10,300 square feet that was used as an accumulation point for spent solvents and other fluids generated by Safety Kleen customers. All wastes stored at the site were ultimately shipped to an off

- site Safety Kleen recycle center or a contract reclaimer. During operations, two 12, 000

- gallon underground storage tanks were used at the site: one tank was used to store spent parts washer solvents, and the other tank stored mineral spirits based solvent. Two loading units were used to transfer waste parts washer solvent to the underground storage tanks. There were also two areas designated for container storage. The site was a permitted RCRA Part B facility. It received permits on the following dates: June 12, 1990 and July 22, 1994. Its permit expired in September of 1999. Description of Contamination: In January, 1988, and April, 1989, spills were reported from overfilling an underground storage tank. In October, 1989, an underground storage tank failed a tank tightness inspection and leakage was discovered. In December, 1989, 45 gallons of solvents spilled from a storage tank. In June, 1993, 13 gallons of used oil spilled during a truck transfer operation. In 1996, on

- site sampling unearthed evidence of soil and groundwater contamination with petroleum hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds. Groundwater monitoring at this site has been on

- going since July 1989, and has shown consistent detections of TPH, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, and some volatile organic compounds. Based on these findings, the former tank pi t area, the former return and fill station area, and the former piping trench have been the focus of remedial efforts at the site. The Maryland Department of the Environment issued a Post Closure Permit for the area, which includes remediation goals and requirements for the cleanup of the groundwater and soil. RCRA Corrective Actions have included a soil vapor extraction system, removal of the underground storage tanks, and other post

- closure corrective actions. Sources of Information: Hamerburg, Ed (4 10) 537

- 3345, Interview. 28 October 2005. EPA Region 3

- RCRA Baseline Facilities. “Safety Kleen Corporation.” (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/ca/md/pdf/mdd00073 7395.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Maryland

149 USEPA. “ RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Safety Kleen Corp 2

- 058

- 011.” 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/ rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=MDD000737395 USEPA. “Safety Kleen Corp.” RCRAInfo . 12 January 2005. 21 January 2006. USEPA. “Safety Kleen Corp. Silver Spring.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0303873 USEPA. “Safety Kleen Corporation 2 058 011.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 24 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000614005 Additional Contacts: Bob Greaves, Chief RCRA Operations Branch EPA Region 3 (215) 814

- 3423 Amin Yazdanian, Maryland Department of the Environment (410) 537

- 3345 Ed Hamerburg at (410) 537

- 3345 Bill Schmidt (410) 537

- 3345Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Maryland

150 Site Information Site Name: Spectron, Inc. EPA ID No.: MDD000218008 Address: 111 Providence Rd., Elkton, MD 21921 County: Cecil NPL Site: Final: 5/31/1994 In CERCLIS Database: 0300192 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Spectron, Inc., site is comprised of approximately 8 acres located just outside of Elkton, Maryland, in a rural residential area. In 1961, Galaxy Chemicals, Inc., began a solvent recovery operation that treated wastes generated by the electronics, pharmaceutical, paint, and chemical process industries. The site had previously been a paper mill. Galaxy Chemicals went bankrupt in 1975, and the facility was re

opened as Solvent Distill ers, Inc., with primarily the same ownership. Solvent Distillers, which later became Spectron, Inc., closed the facility in 1988 and declared bankruptcy. At the time the facility closed, all of its RCRA Part A permits were expired. Solvent recovery operations used several lagoons onsite to store wastes. Nearby residents repeatedly complained about the odors emanating from the lagoons and a sludge pit. The site has a history of improper management of recyclables and disposal of residuals. During a joint USEPA and Maryland Water Resources Administration inspection at the site in 1979, approximately 1,500 drums were found in the area of the former evaporation lagoon. Approximately 500 of these drums were damaged, rusting, open, and leaking. Adjacent to this lagoon was a sludge pit that received solid residues until it was filled in June, 1969. Also located on the site were between 50 and 73 tanks holding 582,000 gallons of hazardous substances, including chlorinated solvents, other organic compounds, and heavy metals. Description of Contamination : When Spectron went bankrupt and ceased operations, approximately 500,000 gallons of flammable liquids, 1,100 drums, and 67 large storage tanks containing hazardous chemicals and waste were left at the site. USEPA disposed of these wastes and negotiated an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) with potentially responsible parties (PRPs) to clean out flammable sludges from the tanks. Another AOC was signed in 1991, requiring over 100 PRPs (the site has approximately 1,000 PRPs) to control seeps of contaminated groundwater along the west bank of Little Elk Creek. The soil and groundwater are heavily contaminated with predominately chlorinated organic solvents. Little Elk Creek traverses the site and was contaminate d, including pure product in the sediments, by site activities. In April 1998, USEPA and Maryland Department of the Environment decided that a ground water containment, collection, and treatment system would be installed to catch and treat contaminated s eeps discharging from the site. Construction began in the fall of 1998 and was completed in September, 2000.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Maryland

151 In March 2003, a Federal District Judge in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland finalized a settlement that required de minimis parties to pay $5.3 million toward the clean

- up of the Spectron site. The de minimis settlement included approximately 500 parties who sent relatively small amounts of hazardous material to the site while it was in operation. According to the September 16, 2004 Record of Decision, the estimated present worth cost of the remedy was $9,492,014. S ources of Information: EPA Region 3: Mid

- Atlantic Superfund. “Current Site Information: Galaxy/Spectron Inc.” 28 October 2005. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/super/sites/MDD000218008/index.htm Maryland Department of the Environment. “Facts about: Galaxy/Spectron Site.” 8 December 2005. 17 January 2006. http://www.mde.state.md.us/assets/document/brownfields/spectron.pdf Sanchez, Robert (EPA RPM) (215) 814

- 3451. Interview. 15 November 2001. USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Dec ision: Spectron, Inc Site.” 16 September 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/super/sites/MDD000218008/rod/2004

- 09

- 16/index.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Spectron Inc.” 31 May 1994. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0300192.pdf USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Spectron Inc.” 6 June 2006. 24 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=MDD000218008 USEPA. “Spectron, Inc.” Envirofacts Data Wareh ouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110001767268 USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Spectron Inc .” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0300192 Additional Contacts: Robert Sanchez, EPA Region 3 (215) 81 4

- 3451, sanchez.robert@epa.gov Carrie Deitzel, Community Involvement Coordinator (215) 814

- 5525 Rashmi Mathur, Remedial Project Manager (215) 814

- 5234, mathur.ras hmi@epa.gov Kim Lemaster, Maryland Department of the Environment/Federal Superfund Division (410) 537

- 3440Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Massachusetts

152 Site Information Site Name: JG Grant & Sons Inc. EPA ID No.: MAD071707301 Address: 60 Garden Park, Braintree, MA 02184 County: Norfolk NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0100567 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Prior to the early 1970s, this property was an undeveloped wetland located within Cedar Swamp. In the early 1970s, Antonellis Transportation company developed the property by filling in the northern portion with shredded auto parts and sand. In 1977, JG Grant & Sons, Inc. (Grant) began operating a scrap metal salvage yard on the property. The on

- site operations have involved receiving, sorting, cutting, and proc essing scrap metal that is subsequently shipped to smelters for recycling. Scrap processed at the property included iron, aluminum, brass, copper, steel, computer parts, junked automobiles, machinery parts, tanks of many sizes, drums, and other miscellaneous items. Some of the scrap metal processed at the facility may have contained hazardous coatings of paint, solvents, and/or fuel oil. Between 1977 and 1986, Grant accepted approximately 20 to 30 truckloads of metal scraps per day. The primary client at the time was General Dynamic Shipyard. For an unknown period of time, Grant stored waste oil in a 500

- gallon underground storage tank located on site. In 1984, four fires occurred at the Grant property. While investigating the fires, the Braintree Fire Dep artment observed illegally stored marine paints on the property and notified the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and USEPA of possibly hazardous conditions on the Grant property. A 1986 site inspection revealed ripped bags of asbestos, 20 full drums with unknown contents, and an abandoned 600

- gallon waste oil tank. Current operations at the property are unknown. However, in 1995, Grant had continued accepting approximately one truckload of scrap metal per day from General Electric, and additional items from other clients on an intermittent basis. Description of Contamination: Approximately 10.75 miles of wetland frontage, fisheries, and a Clean Water Act (CWA)

- protected water body occur along the 15

- mile surface downstream water pathway. Analytical results of surface water pathway samples collected from Cedar Swamp and the Monatiquot River in 1986 and 1987 indicated the presence of 13 metals, including barium, chromium, lead, and nickel; three volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including benzene and toluene; fuel oil; 12 semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs); three pesticides; and four polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Based on these results, a CWA

- protected water body, a fishery, and a wetland have been impacted.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Massachusetts

153 Sources of Information: EPA Region 1. “Waste Site Cleanup & Reuse in New England: JG Grant & Sons Inc.” 15 July 2002. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r1/npl_pad .nsf/0/8dc91d312e0ff5a085256b4200604a77?OpenDo cument USEPA. “JG Grant and Sons, Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009289787 USEPA. “JG Grant and Sons, Inc.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 24 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csi tinfo.cfm?id=0100567 Additional Contacts: Daniel Keefe (617) 292

- 5940 Daniel.Keefe@state.ma.us Nancy Smith (Site Assessment Manager) (617) 918

- 1436Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Massachusetts

154 Site Information Site Name: Lubrx Products, Inc EPA ID No.: MAD985278654 Address: 342 East Washingto n Street, North Attleboro, MA 02761 County: Bristol NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0102150 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Between 1975 and 1994, Lubrx Products Inc., owned the 0.72

- acre site and manufactured and recycled lubricating oils. The property is currently occupied by a canvas products manufacturing company, a brick recycling business, and an automobile repair business. The site has been occupied by companies with a history of blending and containerizing oil for distribution since 1914. A tank farm was once located onsite, and a number of aboveground storage tanks with unknown contents are currently at the location. Description of Contamination: At the time of facility closure, known hazardous waste sources included tanks and totes of varying volumes containing virgin and waste oil; an abandoned gasoline underground storage tank; the former tank farm location, and a debris pile containing used tires; automobile parts; wood debris; and empty plastic oil containers.
Analytical results of surface soil and waste oil samples collected from the property in October 1996 indicated the presence of three volatile organic compounds (VOCs), eight semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), three pesticides, and eight metals, includi ng elevated levels of chromium and lead. Groundwater samples collected in 1989 also indicated the presence of several chlorinated VOCs, including vinyl chloride. Based on the direction of groundwater flow and the proximity of nearby groundwater drinking w ater supplies to the property, potential impacts to groundwater drinking water sources are unknown. Finally, sediment samples collected in October 1996 from along the Tenmile River indicated the presence of 13 SVOCs, four pesticides, and 11 inorganic el ements, including chromium, lead, and mercury. Several of the substances detected in the sediment samples were also detected in on - site surface soil and waste oil samples. The Lubrx property is classified by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) as a Tier 2 site and is currently in Phase II (Comprehensive Site Assessment) of the five phase Massachusetts Contingency Plan. MADEP has recommended that this site be assigned state lead status. Sources of Information: EPA Region 1. “Waste Site Cleanup & Reuse in New England: Lubrx Products, Inc.” (n.d.). 17 November 2005. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r1/npl_pad.nsf/0/a3a8d7c5e251dafd85256b4200604fd1?OpenDo cumentAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Massachusetts

155 USEPA. “Lubrx Products Inc.,” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0102150 USEPA. “Sanborn Inc dba Lubrx,” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110003420940 Additional Contacts: Nancy Smith (SAM) (617) 918

- 1436 smith.nancya@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Massachusetts

156 Site Information Site Name: Zimble Drum EPA ID No.: MAN000103183 Address: 61 Endicott Street, Norwood, MA 02062 County: Norfolk NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0103183 Site Histo ry and Description of Recycling Operation: The Zimble Drum site is located on a 13

- acre property and is a defunct scrap metal recycling facility. According to the fire department and the town building inspector, the company has not been active at the site for approximately ten years and unauthorized access has been a problem. The site includes four 1

- story buildings. Three of the buildings are brick/masonry construction and one is pre

- finished metal. One of the brick buildings has an unfinished basement, additional office space, and a loading dock. A second building also has an unfinished basement where a number of containers were staged. The Zimble Drum site is a "removal only" site, meaning the Site Assessment program has not had any involvement at this location. Description of Contamination: In May 2002, a number of containers, drums, and cylinders were found left behind at the site. There were approximately 100 containers scattered throughout the four buildings. These included seven cylinders, eight capacitors with “Pyranol” labels, indicative of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) containing oil, a number of 55

- gallon drums, and various sized smaller containers. Some of the cylinders were unlabeled. Stained floors indicated past leaks. Many of the 55

- gallon drums were labeled as containing oil or oil

like product, but they did not appear to be virgin drums. Other container labels indicated the presence of sulfuric acid and mercury. Lead was found at elevated levels in the soil, and some soil samples c ontained semi

- volatile organic compounds and asbestos. According to the November 30, 2005, Federal Register Notice, Gill Pond Realty Trust agreed to pay $300,000 to the Hazardous Substance Superfund and to complete remediation of contaminated surface so ils on Site. Sources of Information: EPA Region 1. “Waste Site Cleanup & Reuse in New England: Zimble Drum.” 9 October 2002. 17 November 2005. http:/ /yosemite.epa.gov/R1/npl_pad.nsf/0/3bcec1dfa2d37d0785256c4d00498046?OpenD ocument Federal Register (Volume 70, Number 229) Page 71846

- 71847. “Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement; Gill Pond Realty Trust, Zimble Drum Superfund Site, Norw ood, MA.” 30 November 2005. 25 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA

- WASTE/2005/November/Day

- 30/f6697.htmAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Massachusetts

157 USEPA. “Zimble Drum.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 23 Oc tober 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0103183 USEPA. “Zimble Drum.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110013802288 USEPA. “Zimble Drum.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.) 24 October 2006. http://www.epaosc.net/site_profile.asp?site_id=AP

Additional Contacts: Gary Lipson (OSC) (617) 918

- 1274; lipson.gary@epa.gov Nancy Smith (SAM) (617) 918

- 1436 Alex Sherrin (OSC) (617) 918

- 1252; sherrin.alex@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Michigan

158 Site Information Site Name: Carter Industrials, Inc. EPA ID No.: MID980274179 Address: 4690 Humboldt, Detroit, MI 48208 County: Wayne NPL Site: Deleted: 3/25/1997 In CERCLIS Database: 0502729 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: From 1966 to 1986, the 3.6 acre site was used to store and salvage scrap metal. The facility changed ownership several times during this period. A portion of the scrap metal items accepted at the Carter Industrials site included electrical capacitors and transformers. On

- site facilities included a furnace for melting aluminum, a furnace for melting copper, a brick warehouse, and an office building. Numerous unsheltered piles of scrap metal and equipment were found throughout the yard. On July 3, 1984, a fire ignited on the west side of the property in an area of wooden pallets and scrap iron mounds. After noting several transformers in the area of the fire, the city asked the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and the fire marshall's office to investigate potential exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the transformer oil. Oil was found near the fire area and near the base of three large transformers. Other transformers on the west side proved to be empty. Four soil samples were taken from various locations, including near the office and 150 feet south of the end of Humboldt Road, to measure background levels. PCBs ranged from 31 to 2,430 parts per million. Except for the areas noted, no conclusive evidence of oil storage or dumping was discovered on the west side of the property. However, other areas were not investigated. Description of Contamination: In 1986, extensive soil contamination was identified at the site. The primary contaminants of concern affecting soil and debris were organics, including PCBs, and metals, including arsenic, cadmium, and lead. During salvage operations at the site, dielectric fluids containing PCBs were spilled from electrical capacitors and transformers, contaminating on site soil. Commercial , municipal, and residential properties adjacent to the site were contaminated by direct runoff of spilled material; contaminated storm water runoff; wind

- blown dust; and tracking of spilled material and contaminated soils by vehicular traffic. In May 198 6, barrels of used PCB oil were found stored on

- site in and around scrap metal piles. Oil leaking from the barrels contained as much as 50 percent PCBs. Additional sampling in June 1986 indicated that contamination had spread well beyond the Carter Indus trials property, including into backyards of nearby residences. According to an estimate in a USEPA Record of Decision, costs for the remedial action amounted to $19,508.00. Sources of Information: EPA Region 5. “NPL Fact Sheets for Michigan: Carter Industrials, Inc.” June 2005. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5/superfund/npl/michigan/MID980274179.htmAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Michigan

159 USEPA. “Carter Industrials Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d). 23 October 2003. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009292210 USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Carter Industrials, Inc.” 18 September 1991. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0591169.pdf USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision Amendment: Carter Industrials, Inc.” 28 February 1995. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/a0595284.pdf USEPA. “Federal Register Notice: Notice of Deletion of the Carter Industrials Site, Michigan from the National Priorities List (NPL).” 25 March 1997. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/d970325.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Narr ative for Carter Industrials, Inc.” 31 March 1989. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0502729.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Carter Industrials, Inc.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 24 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0502729 Additional Contacts: Linda Howard (RPM) (312) 886

- 0 810 Jennifer Ostermeier (CIC) (312) 353

- 0618Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Michigan

160 Site Information Site Name: Pellestar Limited EPA ID No.: MIN000508651 Address: 1201 County Road 492, Negaunee Township, MI 49866 County: Marquette NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0508651 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The Pellestar Limited property is an abandoned industrial property located in an industrial area in Marquette County between Negaunee and Marquette, Michigan. Previous owners had used the property for research and development of pelletizing technologies and for metal recovery. Operations included the recycling of arc furnace dust, arc furnace waste oxides, flue dust, caustic ash, mill scale, plating sludge, medical sharps, automobile air bag inflators, and used oil filters. After Pellestar, Ltd., closed down metal recovery operations in 1997, Marquette County, Michigan took possession of the property. The property covers 18 acres and contains various buildings from previous industrial activities. There are four wastewater treatment lagoons on the northern part of the property. Lagoons 1, 2, and 3 were lined; however, lagoon 4 was unlined. There is an abandoned well on the property located near the northwest corner of the main building. Description of Contamination : 11,474 tons of soil contaminated with heavy metals were disposed of at Marquette County landfill. Four aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), 209 drums, 48 pails, 28 mercury switches, 250 small containers, and 15 compressed cylinders were also disposed. A November 4, 2003, Federal Register Notice details a compromise for payment of past response costs incurred in connection with the Pellestar site. Included in the agreement are the following settling parties: Carpenter Technology Corporation; Cleveland Cliffs Iron Company; General Motors Corporation; Howmet Corporation; Ispat Inland Inc.; Technology Development Corporation and its subsidiaries, including Pellet Technology Corporation; and TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. The settlement require s the settling parties to perform a removal action at the site and reimburse USEPA for costs incurred after April 1, 2003. Past costs (USEPA costs incurred prior to April 1, 2003) in the amount of $118,328 are being compromised in consideration of the settling parties' commitment to perform the removal and pay all costs after April 1, 2003. Sources of Information : Federal Register (Volume 68, Number 213). Page 62454. “Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement; Pellestar Site, Negaunee, MI. ” 4 November 2003. 15 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA

- WASTE/2003/November/Day

- 04/f27676.htmAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Michigan

161 Michigan Department of Community Health. “Health Consultation Report: Pellestar Limited.” 29 January 2002. 17 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/pellestar/pel_toc.html USEPA. “Pellestar.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 24 October 2006

. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0508651 USEPA. “Pellestar.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110002437809 USEPA. “Pellestar.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.) 17 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/pellestar Additional Contacts : Brian Kelly (OSC) kelly.brian@epa.gov (734) 692

- 7677Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Michigan

162 Site Information: Site Name: Saran Protective Coatings EPA ID No.: MIN000509094 Address: 17332 S hields Street, Detroit, MI 48212 County: Wayne NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0509094 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Saran Protective Coatings Co. (SPC) was incorporated in 1950 and operated at this location from 1987 to 2002. Operations included recycling lubricants and manufacturing protective coatings for metal products, specializing in polyurethane coatings. Waste from another SPC facility on Oakman Boulevard in Detroit, Michigan, was also transferred to this location until 1987. SPC ceased operations in August 2002. A main production building, three storage buildings, an office/laboratory building, and a shed occupy the site. Description of Contamination : In October 2003, approximately 400 abandoned drums were observe d by the USEPA on

- site assessment, as well as numerous small containers and laboratory

- sized containers. Analytical results for samples collected from the drums and containers indicated the presence of corrosive and ignitable materials, as well as solvent materials. USEPA has initiated a fund

- lead cleanup, as enforcement efforts were not effective because the potentially responsible party (PRP) claiming the lack of funds needed to conduct the cleanup. Sources of Information: EPA Region 5. “Reports of Si gnificant Developments and Activities ending on October 8, 2004.” 15 October 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5/superfund/significant_actions/2004/041008.txt USEPA. “Saran Protective Coatings.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0509094 USEPA. “Saran Protective Coatings.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110003634274 USEPA. “Saran Protective Coatings.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.). 17 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/SPC Additional Contacts: Jeffrey Kimble (OSC) (734) 692

- 7688 kimb le.jeffrey@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Michigan

163 Site Information Site Name: Thermo

- Chem Inc. EPA ID No.: MID044567162 Address: 4331 Evanston Ave, Muskegon, MI 49443 County: Muskegon NPL Site: Final: 06/10/86 In CERCLIS Database: 0502486 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Thermo

- Chem, Inc., a subsidiary of the Thomas Solvent Co., owned and operated waste solvent reprocessing and storage facilities at this site from 1961 to October 1986. It reclaimed solvents such as trichloroethylene and methylene chloride , paint wastes, and antifreezes. Waste sludges and residues from the process were incinerated onsite, and waste waters were discharged to a clay

- lined lagoon and two seepage lagoons. At one time, 3,500 drums of waste solvents and a 20,000

- gallon tank of liquid waste contaminated with C

- 66 (a pesticide residue) were present onsite. The company has since removed them. These operations resulted in high concentrations of volatile organic compound, semivolatile organic compound, and inorganic compound contami nation of soils and groundwater. The site is being addressed through federal, state, and potentially responsible parties’ (PRPs) actions The operation received Interim Status under Subtitle C of RCRA when the owner filed Part A of a permit application f

or storage tanks. Description of Contamination : Site operations resulted in high concentrations of volatile organic compound, semivolatile organic compound, and inorganic compound contamination of soils and groundwater. PRPs have been conducting cleanup activities under a Unilateral Administrative Order, dated May 6, 1992. To date, PRPs have completed Remedial Action (RA) for Operable Unit 1 (OU1) Record of Decision (ROD): Phase IA, Debris Removal; Phase IB, Soil Excavation, Treatment and Removal; Ph ase II, Groundwater Extraction and Treatment System; and Phase III, In

- Situ Soil Vapor Extraction/Air Sparge System. For OU2, the Remedial Investigation is complete and indicates that no further RA is necessary. An Explanation of Significant Difference (E SD) was issued in September 2002 for OU1 ROD to explain and justify this course of action. Monitoring at the site will continue at the site, based on the Operations & Maintenance Plan. The estimated cost of cleanup was $24,000,000. There was some concern that the extraction system was not intercepting and capturing the plume and that contamination was being allowed into the wetlands. The ESD specified that the plume be captured. A study was conducted by Subterranean Research for US EPA in the fall of 200 3, which indicated the plume was currently being captured, but that the plume capture was integrally associated with the hydraulic gradient north of the extraction system. Changes will be made to the O&M procedures to calculate the required pumping extraction rate as a function of the hydraulic gradient to insure capture of the plume. Additional extraction wells may beAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Michigan

164 required if the groundwater levels at the site return to pre

- remedy levels. In addition, changes will be made to the groundwater monitoring program to insure that the groundwater in the flood plain continues to improve. A new monitoring well will be installed at the western edge of the plume to detect any potential migration of contamination to the west. Sources of Information: Agency for Tox ic Substances and Disease Registry. “Public Health Assessment: Thermo Chem Incorporated.” 20 February 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/thermochem/the_p1.html#_1_2 USEPA. “EPA Record of Decision: Thermo

- Chem, Inc.” 30 September 1991. 20 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0591174.pdf USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Thermo Chem, Inc.” 12 July 2005. 20 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5/superfund/npl/michigan/MID044567162.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Thermo

- Chem, Inc.” 10 June 1986. 20 February 2006.] http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0502486.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Thermo Chem Inc.” CERCLIS . 11 September 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0502486 USEPA. “Thermo Chem Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.) 20 February 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110003594021 Additional Contacts : John Fagiolo (RPM) (312) 886

- 0800, fagiolo.john@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Minnesota

165 S ite Information Site Name: 2303 Kennedy Street Site EPA ID No.: MND985743616 Address: 2303 Kennedy St., Minneapolis, MN County: Hennepin NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Kennedy Building Site was the locati on of a warehouse, manufacturing, and electrical apparatus repair shop operated by Westinghouse Corporation from 1925 to 1980. It is believed that Westinghouse used a piping system to distribute polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)

- containing fluids to various w ork areas throughout the building. Further, at least two underground storage tanks were on the site at one time. One tank, located in a vaunt inside the building, is currently used for fuel storage. A second tank was located outside the building and was removed in 1987. More recently, a known scam recycler was taking electronics waste from schools and non

profits, saying that he would recycle it for free. Instead, components and parts were sold and abandoned in the building onsite. Investigative work has been coordinated by the building owner, and it focused on determining the extent of PCB contamination in soil and groundwater. The landlord sought cleanup costs and lost rent from people who had recycled the equipment. Description of Contamination: Damage at this site was caused by the sham electronics recycler, not from Westinghouse Corporation, which was not involved in the recycling. Soil samples from soil borings at the site contain elevated levels of PCBs, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), an d lead. PCBs were also detected in wipe samples taken from interior surfaces of the building. Ground water samples at the site have high levels of chlorobenzenes and PCBs. Chlorobenzenes were typically used as carriers or solvents for PCBs. Off

- site migration of the contaminants is suspected and two commercial wells are located within one

- tenth mile downgradient of the site. Even though PCBs were detected in the upper two feet of soil at the site, the soil pathway cannot be scored under USEPA’s Hazard Ranki ng System because the soil is covered by asphalt. PCB

- laden oils were widely used as coolants and lubricants in electrical transformers and capacitors until their manufacture was banned in the United States in 1997 because they are persistent, accumulate in the environment, and are toxic to exposed humans and other animals. The former on

- site manufacturing and maintenance of electrical equipment by the Westinghouse Corporation is thought to be the source of the contamination. Sources of Information: Minnesota Department of Health Consultation Report. September 2001. 25 January 2006. http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/hazardous/sites/hennepin/kndyst0900.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Minnesota

166 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. "2001 Superfund List: Permanent List of Priorities." June 2001. 17 January 2006. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/programs/pubs/plp

- 2001.pdf USEPA. “Stev en Cabinets Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.) 24 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009407392 Additional Contacts: Mike Risse (612) 348

- 5790Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Mississippi

167 Site Information Site Name: Hydromex EPA ID No.: Address: Mississippi County: NPL Site: In CERCLIS Database: Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Hydromex is a plastic blast media (PMB) recycler. This facility is still in operation, but the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) issued it a 7003 equivalent around 2004. CID also has a case open. Hydromex was supposedly converting the PMBs into cinder blocks or slabs (via mixing with at concrete mixture). The bricks crumbled on contact, and therefore could not be used in construction. The slabs were soft, and would not support the weight of a person. The PMBs came mostly from military installation. Description of Contaminatio n: Unknown Sources of Information: EPA Region 4. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 31 October 2005. Additional Contacts: Jeffrey T. Pallas (Chief, South Enforcement and Compliance Section, RCRA Enforcement and Compli ance Branch) (404) 562

- 8616Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Mississippi

168 Site Information Site Name: Industrial Pollution Control EPA ID No.: MSD985972983 Address: 810 Poindexter, Jackson, MS 39207 County: Hinds NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0406903 Site History an d Description of Recycling Operation: The Industrial Pollution Control (IPC) site is a former used oil recycling facility that began operations September 1, 1991 and operated until filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1997. The facility appears to have been used to recycle oil under previous ownership predating September of 1991. Under IPC ownership, the facility received, stored, treated, and processed various petroleum waste products, wastewater, and waste oils. Oil and water were separated in a treatment process onsite and then reconditioned for future sale and re

- use. The water continued to undergo treatment until it met the criteria for discharge, as specified in the facility’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. IPC’s li st of acceptable waste waters included petroleum

- based oils, coolants, groundwater (from underground storage tank remediation activities), bilge water, spent mineral oil, fuel oils, unrefined crude, salt water, and process water containing polymers. The f acility also operated a parts washing service. The spend solvents were included in the acceptable wastewaters. The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) contacted the USEPA in November 1998 to evaluate the site for a possible removal action. The site is abandoned and contains evidence of trespasser entry. On December 11, 1998, USEPA On

- Scene Coordinator (OSC) John McKeown met with Ken Whitten and Eric Dear of MDEQ to conduct an initial assessment of the facility. During the assessment, it was noted that numerous drums (some empty and some with contents) were stockpiled onsite in a storage shed. Some of the drums were in very poor condition and obviously contained corrosive materials. The storage tanks containing the waste oil were in poor condition, and the secondary containment was not sufficiently impervious should a rupture of the tanks occur. Wastewater with a thick oily sheen was found in all secondary containment and was overflowing at some locations onsite. The slope of the facility was toward the northeast in the direction of a small stream located across Terry Road approximately 70 meters away. The asphalt/concrete/soil ground surface was stained in many locations and an obvious black stain led from the tank storage area tow ard the northeast corner of the site. Description of Contamination: In 1999, removal plans were announced. During the week of January 25, 1999, USEPA and Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team (START) conducted a Removal Assessment at the IPC Site, which included collecting soil, tank and drum samples; conducting an inventory of tank and drum contents; performing limited hazardous categorization of specific drums based on appearance and Photo

- Ionization Detector readings; and interviewing previous employees and potential vendors for future disposal of the on

- site waste oil. The most likely contaminated soils could not be assessed due to the volume of wastewater contained within the secondary containment. Some of the hazardous substancesAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from Hazardous Waste Recycling Mississippi

169 detec ted in surface soil sampling include pyrene, fluorene, anthracene, benzene, xylene, and ethylbenzene. Additional contaminants include ethylbenzene, phenanthrene, toluene, 4

- methyl

2

- pentanone, and waste oil that is classified as ignitable under RCRA. The hazardous substances found in soils are believed to have been released from the contents of the tank farm and from loading and unloading of trucks in the area. It was also noted that the sides of the tanks and the inside of secondary containment walls were stained where the oil may have reached during previous spills or while being utilized for additional storage space. The removal plans included inventory, analysis, and preparation of the contents of drums and containers; transportation and disposal of waste oils/water and disassembly of tanks; and excavation and disposal of contaminated soils. According to a March 30, 1999 estimate, the removal was expected to be completed at an estimated cost of $1,821,000. Sources of Information: EPA Region 4. “A dministrative Record Index for the Industrial Pollution Control Site.” 23 March 2000. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region4/waste/errb/ipcar.pdf EPA Region 4

- Environmental News. “EPA Superfund Removal to Begin at Industrial Pollution Control Site, Jackson, Hinds County, Mississippi.” 4 April 1999. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region4/oeapages/99press/04 0299.htm USEPA. “Industrial Pollution Control.” CERCLIS. 1 2 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0406903 USEPA. “Industri al Pollution Control.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110001472273 Additional C ontacts: Steve Spurlin (OSC) 404

- 562

- 8723 Sherryl A. Carbonaro (Community Relations Coordinator) 404

- 562

- 8742Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from H azardous Waste Recycling Missouri

170 Site Information Site Name: Echo Valley Recycling Enterprises EPA ID No.: Address: Rolla, MO County: Phelps NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: A cathode ray tube dump was found in Missouri. An electronics reclaimer left a pile of at least 15,000 computer monitors on land outside Rolla, Missouri. Missouri Environmental officials say a reclaimer leased a nearby building in which to undertake electronics demanufacturing. The reclaimer collected computer monitors from businesses, schools, organizations and individuals in several states in order to reclaim the components of the monitors that might have some value; however, the recycling operation was not successful. In addition to the dumping, there is also evidence that the monitors were recently burned at the site. A lawsuit was brought against the defen dants in June 2006. The lawsuit asks the defendants to pay appropriate penalties and costs to the state. Description of Contamination: The computer monitors pose a potential environmental and safety threat because of the toxic materials they contain, s uch as mercury and lead. Sources of Information: Attorney General Office. “Nixon sues to force cleanups of Phelps County dump containing thousands of used computer monitors.” 29 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://www.ago.mo.gov/newsreleases/2006/062906.htm Resource Recycling, May 2003Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from H azardous Waste Recycling Missouri

171 Site Information Site Name: Missouri Electric Works EPA ID No.: MOD980965982 Address: S Highway 61 2 Mile S Highway K, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 County: Cape Girardeau NPL Site: Final: 2/21/1990 In CERCLIS Database: 0701474 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Missouri Electric Works (MEW) operated on this 6.5

- acre site from 1954 until 1992. Missouri Electri c Works sold, serviced, and reconditioned electric motors, transformers, and transformer controls. In addition, it recycled transformer oil and copper wire. More than 16,000 transformers were repaired or scrapped at the site during its time of operation. The transformer oil was filtered and reused, with about 90 percent of the total salvaged. Facility business records indicate that 28,000 gallons of transformer oil was not recycled. The remaining waste oil was sold to local residents for dust control purposes, disposed of by a contractor, or disposed of onsite. Industrial solvents were used to clean the electrical equipment being repaired or serviced. Solvents were reused until they were no longer effective. Spills and disposal of spent solvents on the MEW property were described by past employees during USEPA

- conducted interviews. The facility was issued an order in 1988, that prohibited further incoming shipments of electrical equipment containing oil with polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) levels in exce ss of 1 part per million (ppm). Description of Contamination: The USEPA found PCBs from site operations in on

- and off

site air sampling during 1987. The soils in the area are somewhat permeable, and the bedrock is highly fractured. These conditions have made it easier for PCBs and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as trichloroethene (TCE) to migrate into the groundwater. VOCs, chlorinated hydrocarbons, and PCBs have been found in the groundwater below the site. Sediments in channels draining the site and areas off site contain PCBs. PCB contamination of the soil is widespread and occurs to a depth of at least 5 feet. The estimated present worth cost for the selected remedial action included in the September 28, 1990, Record of Decision is $9,130,000 . This estimate includes an estimated annual O&M cost of $64,010 for 15 years. Sources of Information: EPA Region 7. “First Five Year Review Report for Missouri Electric Works.” September 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/fiveyear/f04

- 07010.pdf EPA Region 7. “Missouri Electric Works Site Profile.” 22 November 2005. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region7/cleanup/npl_files/mod980965982.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from H azardous Waste Recycling Missouri

172 USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Missouri Electric Works.” 28 September 1990. 17 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/superrods/rodinfo.cfm?mRod=07014741990ROD038 USEPA. “Missouri Electric Works.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110017998666 USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Missouri Electric Works.” CERCLIS

. 11 September 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0701474 Additional Contacts: Pauletta France (Remedial Project Manager) (913) 551

- 7701 Debbie Whitaker (Community Involvement Coordinator) (913) 551

- 7598Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases from H azardous Waste Recycling Missouri

173 Site Informati on Site Name: Rogene French Alcohol Plant EPA ID No.: MOD981722481 Address: Rt. 2 Box 214 Osceola, MO 64776 County: St. Clair NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0702064 Recycling Operation: This site is an abandoned alcohol and solvent recovery dis tillation facility. It operated from the early 1980’s to the late 1980’s under a DNR permit for resource recovery. The facility reclaimed spent solvents from industrial uses and then shipped these reclaimed materials back to the originator. Descriptio n of Contamination : When the site was abandoned, approximately 400 55

- gallon drums were left in two storage buildings onsite. Eleven above

- ground storage tanks were also abandoned. The drums and tanks contain ignitable hazardous waste. S ources of Information: USEPA. “Rogene French Alcohol Plant.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 25 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0702064 USEPA. “Rogene French Alcohol Plant.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110015651463 USEPA. “Rog ene French Alcohol Plant.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.). 17 January 2006. www.Epaosc.net/RogeneFrenchAlcoholPlant Additional Contacts Don Lininger Lininger.don@epa.gov (913) 551

- 7724Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Nebraska

174 Site Information: Site Name: Tetra Micronutrients (formerly American Microtrace) EPA ID No.: NED000610550 Address: 71025 569th Avenue, Fairbury, NE 68352

- 5519 County: Jefferson NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Tetra Micronutrients is a zinc micronutrient fertilizer producer that sells half of its product to animal feed suppliers. Tetra Micronutrients produces the zinc micro fertilizer from non

- hazardous galvanized zinc fines and hazardous brass fume dust from foundries. The facility was built in 1979 and was operated by Eagle Picher Industries. In August 1988, American Microtrace, Inc. began operations sold to Tetra Technologies, Inc. in 1995. The site owners obtained multiple Part A RCRA permits, but never a Part B permit due to confusion between USEPA and Nebraska Department of Environmental Control. The federal ruling on the issue was that zinc fume dust was a solid waste in this case, even though it was being recycled into a product that was to be applied to the ground (fertilizer). This facility received an administrative order of conduct in September 1998. Description of Contamination: Potential sources of contamination at the facility include: permitted air emissions; precipitation runoff from the roofs; releases from previous raw material and waste material handling practices; runoff from residual contamination in soil; releases from the sulfuric acid tanks; and releases from the former soil pile. The primary contaminants of concern at the facility are metals, including lead, cadmium, and zinc. The site was cited with six counts of failure to maintain facility to minimize release, three counts of storage, maintaining an il legal hazardous waste pile, and failure to maintain facility operating records. Employees were walking around knee deep in zinc dusts, which resulted in extremely elevated blood lead levels in several instances. The dust was stored on the ground in open piles and in large bins and was transported by rail cars in super sacks. The recycling processes also generated lead sulfate and cadmium sulfate wastes that were stored onsite. There was contamination to a nearby wetland. Sources of Information: Davis, Mike (EPA Official) (913) 551

- 7328, Interview. 20 December 2005. EPA Region 7. “Environmental Indicators at Tetra Micronutrients.” 12 August 2002. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region7/waste/pdf/tetramicronutrientsCA725.pdf USEPA. “Economic Analysis for Regulatory Modifications to the Definition of Solid Waste for Zinc

- Containing Hazardous Waste

- Derived Fertilizers.” November 2000. 17 January 2006. F: \

Us er\KBRUNESK\

mystuff \ METADATA\

rzfp \Fertilizer_EA.PDFAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Nebraska

175 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for International Mineral Technologies LLC.” 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=NED000610550 USEPA. “Tetra Micronutrients.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000447767 USEPA. “Tetra Micronutrients.” RCRAInfo . 5 May 2005. 20 January 2006. Contacts: Belinda Holmes, Associate Regional Counsel, Region VII, (913) 551 7714 Jody Hudson, EPA, RCRA Corrective Action and Permits (913) 551

- 7179 Pat Murrow, EPA, RCRA Corrective Action and Permits (913) 551

- 7627 Don Toensing, EPA, RCRA Enforcement (913) 551

- 7446 Mike Davis, EPA, 913

- 551

- 7328Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Hampshire

176 Site Information Site Name: Beede Was te Oil EPA ID No.: NHD018958140 Address: 7 Kelly Road, Plaistow, NH 03865 County: Rockingham NPL Site: Final: 12/23/1996 In CERCLIS Database: 0102723 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Beede Waste Oil, an inactive waste oil recycling and virgin fuel oil storage and distribution facility, includes two adjacent parcels totaling 39 acres. The site was the location of several oil

- related operations, including waste oil processing and re

- sale, fuel oil sale, contaminated soil processin g into cold

- mix asphalt, anti

freeze recycling, and other related industries. These activities were reportedly conducted from the 1920's until operations ceased in August 1994. The first parcel has been occupied by oil

- related businesses since 1926, wh en Robert Beede operated a waste oil recycling facility on site, receiving waste oils, collecting and storing the oils on site in containers, and then reselling usable oils to asphalt manufacturing facilities and towns for dust suppression. Between 1964 an d 1979, Cash Oil operated on site, and in 1979, Cash Energy, Inc. purchased the property. The last oil

- related business, Tri

- State Resources, left the property in August 1994. Waste oil was deposited in a surface impoundment for an unknown duration betwe en 1960 and 1975 and in an underground storage vault from an unspecified date until its removal in 1991. The oils were periodically pumped into a series of aboveground storage tanks (ASTs). By 1978, 86 ASTs with a total capacity of 1.3 million gallons were in use. Thirty

- eight of these tanks have been documented to contain waste oil, sludge, and/or water contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and/or metals. Several tanks are known to have leaked, including one used to store PCB

- contaminated wa ste oil. This site did not hold a RCRA Part B permit. Description of Contamination: The primary contaminants that have been found in the soil, sediment, surface water, and groundwater include PCBs, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polyaromatic hydroc arbons (PAHs), petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) and lead. VOCs in the groundwater continue to migrate offsite, and have impacted 14 adjacent residential wells. Three underground storage tanks used to store waste oils were removed sometime after 1979. More th an 200 drums of oil, sludge, and contaminated soil are stockpiled on site. The following materials were abandoned when operations ceased in 1994: approximately 100 large above

- ground storage tanks containing hazardous and non

- hazardous oil product; several large piles of soil containing varying levels of contamination; and about 800 drums of oil product, some containing hazardous materials, which were stored in an open, roofed area. The levels of VOCs exceeded the allowable levels in drinking water in the on - site monitoring wells and in two residential off

- site wells. Floating oil was found on the groundwater at the site. The oil has periodically seeped into the Kelley Brook that flows adjacent to the site. In the fall ofAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Hampshire

177 1983, chemical contamination was di scovered in a residential well near the site. By 2004, 80,000 gallons have oil were removed from the site. In January 2004, USEPA announced a $48 million cleanup plan for restoration of Beede Waste Oil Superfund site in Plaistow, New Hampshire. As of January 2004, USEPA and New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services have invested about $19 million for investigation and cleanup work at the site. Sources of Information: EPA Region 1. “Waste Site Cleanup and Reuse: Beede Waste Oil Site.” 3 October 2 005. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region01/superfund/sites/beede/ USEPA. “Beede Waste Oil.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110004088978 USEPA. “Beede Waste Oil.” RCRAInfo . 1 September 2000. 20 January 2006. USEPA. “EPA Announces $48 Million Cleanup Deci sion for the Beede Waste Oil Superfund Site in Plaistow N.H.” 13 January 2004. 6 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region1/pr/2004/jan/040104.html USEPA. “EPA Announces Plan for Fundi ng Cleanup of Beede Superfund Site in N.H.” 8 June 2001. 6 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region1/pr/2001/jun/010609.html USEPA. “EPA Takes Major Step to Fund Cleanup of Beede Superfund Site in N.H.” 3 June 2002. 6 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region1/pr/2002/jun/020603.html USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 17 January 2006. USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Beede Waste Oil. ” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0102723 Additional Contacts: Angela Bonarrigo (CIC) (617) 918

- 1034 T om Condon (OSC) (617) 918

- 1206 James Chow (RPM) (617) 918

- 1394 Dorothy Girten

- Parr (OSC) (617) 918

- 1265 Nancy Smith (SAM) (617) 918

- 1436Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Hampshire

178 Site Information Site Name: Consolidated Recycling, Inc. EPA ID No.: NHD500014436 Address: 164 Mile Slip Rd. Milford, NH 03055 County: Hillsborough NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Consolidated Recycling (CRI) accepted light bulb and light ballast wastes that included mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls (P CBs) from school districts and government agencies in Colorado, New York, North Carolina, Ohio and elsewhere. The owners falsely claimed that CRI had the equipment to recycle the wastes; however, the company never purchased any recycling equipment. The hazardous wastes were collected, stored, and abandoned at locations in Hollis and Merrimack, N.H., and in Fitchburg, Methuen, and Tyngsboro, Mass. The operator of CRI, Franklin D. Sales, was sentenced in May of 2002, to 18 months in prison for misrepresenting the capability of his recycling and disposal operation. Sales pleaded guilty in January to wire fraud, mail fraud, and making false statements. Sales accepted large quantities of fluorescent bulbs containing mercury powder and lighting ballasts contaminated with PCBs that were shipped from out of state to his disposal facilities in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. He deceived customers by claiming that CRI had the equipment and procedures needed to conduct recycling and disposal processes in compliance with federal and state regulations. According to the government, Sales never obtained the necessary equipment or the required permits. Wastes were stockpiled and then abandoned at warehouses in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. As part of the scheme, S ales issued fraudulent "certificates of recycling" to CRI customers, according to prosecutors. One of the customers Sales’ was the U.S. Department of the Army, which shipped bulbs from its base at Fort Drum, N.Y., and received false certificates of recyc ling from the company. The case arose out of violations of environmental statutes, such as RCRA, and was investigated by the USEPA, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. All of the charges, however, involved criminal fraud. In addition to receiving the 18

- month prison term, Sales was ordered to pay restitution totaling more than $280,000 to victims of the scheme. Description of Contamination: Unknown Sources of Informatio n: Daily Environment Report No, 91. “Recycler Sentenced to 18 Months in Prison For Making False Claims about Capabilities.” BNA, Inc. 10 May 2002. 20 January 2006. http://pubs.bna.com/NWSSTND/IP/BNA/den.nsf/SearchAllView/02A1169BADB7BF1F 85256BB5000679F4?Open&highlight=RECYCLERAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Hampshire

179 New Hampshire Supreme Court. “Transcript of the State v. Consolidated Recycling Inc.” 16 December 1 999. 17 January 2006. http://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/1999/consolid.htm USEPA. “Consolidated Recycling Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 17 J anuary 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110007685861 USEPA News Release. “New Hampshire Man Pleads Guilty in Recycling Fraud.” 1 F ebruary 2002. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/6fbf350992c6935c85256b530063747e?Open Document Additional Contacts: Luke C. Hester 202

- 564

- 7818, hester.luke@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Hampshire

180 Site Information Site Name: Harding Metals Inc. EPA ID No.: NHD018955641 Address: Rte. 4, Northwood, NH 03261 County: Rockingham NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database : 0101098 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Though the privately owned property is 100 acres, only 4 acres were used for day

- to

- day operations. Harding Metals Inc. includes an office building, warehouse, precious metals reclamation building, incinerator building, sawdust disposal area, scrap metal area, discarded mixing tanks, landfill area, and a transformer oil disposal area. The remainder of the property consists of undeveloped woodlands, a hayfield, and a wooded wetland. Sinc e 1963, Harding Inc. has operated as a metals reclamation facility, processing and disposing of industrial wastes. Numerous areas of environmental concern have been noted throughout the property, including approximately 3,200 cubic yards of contaminated sawdust, which have been dumped into a landfill and a large pile; 2 areas where polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)

- containing transformer oils were allegedly dumped; 20 containers (volumes unknown) of metal reclamation wastes containing cyanide and acid solution s stored throughout the property; a drainage ditch that carried copper washing away from the incinerator building; air releases of cadmium oxide and possibly PCBs from the incinerator; 6 old 5,000

- gallon mixing tanks with a layer of polyester resin; numerous 55

- gallon drums of unknown contents; and an unknown quantity of solder dross and solder pot dump. Description of Contamination: USEPA investigations conducted at the site include a Preliminary Assessment in 1980, a Screening Site Inspection in May 19 90, and a Site Inspection Prioritization in December 1996. Though the site was discovered in 1987, exactly when the contamination occurred is unknown. Analytical results of surface soil samples collected from the property in 1996 indicated the presence of PCBs, pesticides, 13 semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and metals at levels above background concentrations. Groundwater samples collected in 1990 from 4 on

- site monitoring wells indicated the presence of 12 VOCs. Sources of Information: EPA Region 1. “Waste Site Cleanup & Reuse: Harding Metals Inc.” 15 July 2002. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r1/npl_pad.nsf/0/6ffe37bffbfcd13785256b420060670c?OpenDoc ument McLuskey, Mike (EPA Official) (603) 271

- 2183, Interview. 8 December 2005Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Hampshire

181 USEPA. “Harding Metals, Inc.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 24 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0101098 USEPA. “Harding Metals, Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110007132290 Additional Contacts: Don Smith, Site Assessment Manager, (617) 918

- 1433, smith.donald@epa.gov Nancy Smith, SAM, (617) 918

- 1436Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

182 Site Information Site Name: Atlantic Resources Corporation EPA ID No.: NJD981558430 Address: 1 Horseshoe Rd., Sayreville, NJ 08872 County: Middlesex NPL Site: Final: 9/5/2002 In CERCLIS Database: 0201116 Site History and Descrip tion of Recycling Operation: Operations at this site began in the late 1930s. International Recycling operated on this site from 1968 through 1972. From 1972 until 1985, Atlantic Resources operated on the site. Both companies recovered gold and silver by incineration, reverse plating, smelting, and acid etching from fly ash, film (including x

- rays), circuit boards, building material, silverware, and other waste material containing silver and gold. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were used as fuel in the incinerators. Atlantic Resources filed for bankruptcy in 1985 after investigation for dioxins on the site revealed a substantial amount of contamination. In 2000, USEPA selected a cleanup plan to demolish chemically

- contaminated debris structures l ocated above ground at the 17

- acre Horseshoe Road Complex, a federal Superfund site adjacent to Atlantic Resources Corporation facility. As a result, Atlantic Resources joined the Horseshoe Road Complex as a Superfund site in 2002. The USEPA remediation plan calls for the demolition of buildings and structures; the removal of surface debris, recycling of metal, concrete and brick; and the off

- site disposal of the demolition debris. Total costs are expected to be about $1.4 million ($864,000 for the Atlantic Resources area and $522,000 for the Atlantic Development area). The cleanup will take approximately 13 months to complete. USEPA plans to address soils, groundwater and sediments in the marsh and river in future cleanup actions at the Horseshoe Road Complex federal Superfund site. The agency is currently investigating the Raritan River and nearby wetlands to pinpoint the extent and nature of any site

- related contamination. Past cleanup work has been conducted at the site using federal and state fun ds. In a series of cleanups since 1985, USEPA and the state have removed more than 3,000 drums (found buried and on the surface) and cleaned up dioxin and mercury spills. Materials found in numerous tanks and vats, as well as excavated contaminated soils and debris were also removed from the site. A settlement to reimburse USEPA for a portion of the cleanup costs was reached with some of the parties responsible for the contamination. However, the responsible parties have yet to perform any of the work. Des cription of Contamination : Materials were not managed to minimize loss, and a brushfire in 1981 revealed 70 partially filled drums containing acetonitrile, silver cyanide, and ethyl acetate. Contamination on site includes volatile organic compounds (VOCs ), semi

- VOC’s, base

neutral compounds, heavy metals, pesticides, dioxins, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). During cleanup, USEPA removed acids from leaking vats, and cleaned up mercury spills andAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

183 other hazardous substances found on site. USEPA also disposed of many materials off site, including 152 drums, 5550 gallons of combustible liquid, 70 pounds of mercury, 520 cubic yards of contaminated debris, and 15 gas cylinders. Incineration of film had led to dioxin contamination, and waste solvents leaked out of storage containers. Impact to surface soils was largely contamination from metals, such as mercury and cadmium; impact to groundwater was largely from solvents. Atlantic Resources also was noted to have discharged wastes directly into the Raritan River and the marsh by New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Investigations have shown that these releases are contaminating the Raritan River, which is a fishery, and surrounding marshes. The site was highly contaminated, due to sloppy operation and illegal practices, such as the use of nitric acid for etching and direct dumping of wastes into a nearby run

- off stream. Sources of Information: EPA Region 2

- Newsroom. “EPA Places Three Sites on the Final Superfund National Priorities List in New Jersey.” 4 September 2002. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/748a5f3669ca0b6c852570180055 c8cb/2373b0 695d1dabad85257164006aa7a4!OpenDocument EPA Region 2

- Newsroom. “EPA Selects Cleanup Plan for Above

- Ground Structures at Superfund Site on Horseshoe Road in Sayreville, New Jersey.” 3 October 2000. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/7144dd430c47561885257018004c77a3/0014d 1f1080520348525716a006975b7!OpenDocument USEPA. “Atlantic Resourc es.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110001534475 USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative f or Atlantic Resources Corporation.” 2 September 2002. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0201116.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Atlantic Resources.” 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0201116 Additional Contacts: John Osolin (RPM) (212) 637

- 4412, Interview 6/30/05Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

184 Site Information Site Name: Boro Auto Wreckers, Inc. EPA ID No.: NJD091397299 / NJR000013623 Address: 2271 Hamilton Blvd., South Plainfield, NJ 07080 County: Middlesex NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Descri ption of Recycling Operation: The Boro Auto Wreckers site is a 4

- acre site operating as an auto salvage and scrap metal recycling facility since 1935. The property was owned and operated by Fred and Carol Errickson who recycled all types of scrap metal f rom tanks, appliances, automobiles, etc. The metal was crushed, stripped of non

- metallic materials, weighted, and shipped offsite for recycling. Ferrous and non

- ferrous scrap metals were stockpiled in the open yard along with other soil and debris.
Boro Auto Wreckers failed to complete necessary remedial investigations and actions required by a 1990 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) administrative consent order, a 1997 judicial consent order, and a 2003 NJDEP administrative cons ent order. In 2004, the New Jersey Supreme Court directed Boro Auto Wreckers to cease operations. The court also allowed the NJDEP access to the site for 18 months to clean up the contaminated scrap yard. In addition, the court ordered Boro Auto Wreckers to pay NJDEP a penalty of $25,250. In 2004, NJDEP authorized $500,000 to begin publicly funded testing and cleanup work at the Boro site. Description of Contamination: Stained and oil

- saturated soils and discharges of petroleum products were first identified by the South Plainfield Health Department in 1984. Since this initial inspection, there have been numerous inspections by local health representatives revealing extensive soil contamination and hazardous discharges onsite as, well as contaminate d storm water discharges off site. Groundwater contaminants have included volatile organic compounds generally associated with petroleum hydrocarbon contamination and gasoline constituents, such as benzene, toluene, xylenes, and methyl tertiary

- butyl ether (MTBE). Soil contaminants have included widespread polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination at levels in excess of 50 ppm; heavy metal contamination (primarily lead); and widespread petroleum hydrocarbon contamination, including polyaromatic hydrocar bons (PAHs). Contaminated soil piles currently exist on site and are being characterized and removed by NJDEP contractors. Sources of Information: EPA Region 2. Email Correspondence with Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 31 October 2005. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. “Court Allows Clean

- up of Scrap yard to Begin.” 9 February 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/newsrel/2005/05_0011.htmAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

185 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. “DEP Seeks Scrap Yard Shut Down and Cleanup” 13 December 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/newsrel/2004/04_0141.htm USEPA. “Boro Auto Wreckers.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.) 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009722979Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

186 Site Information Site Name: Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc. EPA ID No.: NJD011717584 Address: 416 Lanza Ave., Saddle Brook Twp, NJ 07662 County: Bergen NPL Site: Construction Complete: 9/30/1997 In CERCLIS Database: 0200273 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc. is where two active scrap metal recycling businesses operated: Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc. and Cirello Iron and Steel Company. The site is approximately 1 acre in size and contains two single

- story buildings that are used primarily as warehouses. The area surrounding the site is comprised of residential homes and industrial properties. Salvaging operations began at the site in the early 1950s. Prior to this, the land was used for dairy farming. In 1952, Curcio purchased the East and West Lots and in 1981, the company purchased the South Lot. Initially, only rags and paper were recycled. In 1975, aluminum, copper, and other ferrous and non

- ferrous metals began to be stored and recycled at the site. In 1977 , the original structures on the site were demolished, the present main building was erected, and sections of the West Lot were paved. In 1978, the truck scale and scale control shed were constructed on the East Lot. The structures at the site have remai ned essentially unchanged since 1985. Description of Contamination: At least three documented polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) spills had occurred on the site. In 1982, the company received a shipment of 50 electrical transformers, salvaging the copper and baling the remaining metal. During the cutting of the transformers, oil containing PCBs spilled onto the ground. An area covering about 200 square feet was blackened with oil and soil that contained PCBs. Run

- off from the site, taken from a drainage ditch at the rear of the property, also contain PCBs. Site soils are relatively permeable, which facilitates movement of contaminants into ground water. The state became aware of the site in 1982 when a citizen became concerned over Curcio’s activities. The state found the soil and runoff from a drainage ditch to be contaminated with PCBs. In 1985, the state discovered an oil spill that flowed from the site to a pond approximately 300 feet from the Curcio site and determined that Cirello was responsible for the spill. The company spilled approximately 200 gallons of hydraulic fluid on the Curcio site. In 1989, Cirello caused a spill of PCB

contaminated oil into on

- site soil, and the state required Cirello to excavate and drum the resulting contaminated soil. Groundwater was contaminated with the following: vinyl chloride, chloroethane, methylene chloride, acetone, carbon disulfide, 1,1

- dichloroethene, 1,1

- dichloroethane, cis

- 1,2

- dichloroethene, trans

- 1,2

- dichoroethene, chloroform, 1,2

- dichloroethane, 2

- butanone, 1,1,1

- trichloroethane, bromodichloromethane, carbon tetrachloride, barium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, benzene, toluene, aluminum, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, nickel, potassium, selenium, sodium, thallium, vanadium, zi nc, and aroclor. On

- site soil was found to be contaminated with three different PCB's, lead, copper, nickel and trichloroethylene.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

187 Sources of Information: New Jersey Department of Health Environmental Health Service. “Public Health Assessment Curcio Scrap Metal, Incorporated.” 11 May 1995. 19 February 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/curcio/Csm_toc.html USEPA. “Curcio Scrap Metal Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110006819639 USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc.” 28 Jun e 1991. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0291143.pdf USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc.” 30 September 1997. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0297107.pdf USEPA. “First Five

- Year Review Report Curcio Scrap Metal Inc. Superfund Site.” September 2002. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/fiveyear/f02

- 02005.pdf USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc.” (n.d.). 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/superfund/npl/0200273c.pdf USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Curio Scrap Metal, Inc.” 22 July 1987. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0200273.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Curcio Scrap Metal, Inc.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0200273 Additional Contacts: Michelle Granger

- Santana (RPM) (212) 637

- 4975Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

188 Site Information Site Name: Cycle Chem Incorporated EPA ID No.: NJD002200046 Address: 217 South First Street, Elizabeth, NJ 07206 County: Union NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Cycle Chem, a commercial transporter, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF) , purchased its two

- acre property from Perk Chemical Company in 1985. Recycling activities at the facility include recovering spent solvents and treating hazardous and non

- hazardous wastes. Solvents, hazardous and non

- hazardous wastes are stored in containers and tanks. Cycle Chem accepts commercially generated , as well as on

site generated hazardous waste for storage, treatment, and transfer. Cycle Chem was issued a RCRA Part B permit in December 1988 and December 1997. Description of Contamination: Current contaminants in the groundwater on site include benzene, trichloroethene, and tetrachloroethene. Contamination can be linked to current and past storage activities. For instance, Perk Company emptied, cleaned, and removed three aboveground storage tanks that used to contain chlorinated solvents. However , there is also groundwater contamination coming onto the site from a higher site, which suggests that it was caused not only from past operations, but also from some off

- site source. In 2002, Cycle Chem was cited by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) for violating the NJ Water Pollution Control Act. NJDEP noted that Cycle Chem stored a large amount of hazardous waste outdoors, where it was exposed to rain, and could wash into the Elizabeth River. However, there is the possibility that some contamination is due to an off site source. A site

wide investigation is being conducted to determine Cycle Chem’s contribution to the contamination. Sources of Information: Environment News Service. “Hazwaste Company Fined for Polluting River.” 18 November 2002. 17 January 2006. http://ens

- newswire.com/ens/nov2002/2002

- 11

- 18

- 09.asp#anchor7 EPA Region 2

- Waste. “Cycle Chem Incorporated Factsheet.” 1 November 2005. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/waste/fscycle.htm USEPA. “Cycle Chem Corp.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.) 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000319780 USEPA. “Cycle Chem Corp.” RCRAInfo . 26 November 2001. 20 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

189 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Cycle Chem, Inc.” 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=NJD002200046#List% 20of%20Cleanup%20Activities Additional Contacts: Clifford Ng (212) 637

- 4113Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

190 Site Information Site Name: Franklin Burn EPA ID No.: NJD986570992 Address: Marshall Mill Road, Franklin Township, NJ 08322 County: Gloucester NPL Site: Final: 6/17/1996 In CERCLIS Database: 0204087 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The overall site is made up of seven land parcels ranging from 480 square feet to 15,000 square feet. To burn off plastic materials coating insulated wires and other electrical components, each parcel contained series of controlled fires. The exposed copper wiring was then recovered and resold. The burnings took place on open, unprotected ground, and created contaminated piles of ash and areas of contaminated s oil. Site burning operations began as early as 1960 and ceased in 1988. The site has remained inactive since that time. In 1988, illegal activity at the site was reported in to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). NJDEP contacted USEPA, which conducted assessment and removal activities until their completion in 1997. Individuals burning plastics

- coated wires and other electrical components were engaged in illegal activities, subject to criminal prosecution. The activities occurring at Franklin Burn were unknown to the public until anonymously reported in 1988. Not all responsible parties were found, and those found were considered insolvent (not fiscally able to support cleanup). Though the total cost of recovery action, i ncluding all excavation and remedial cleanup, was $8,765,961.70, USEPA expenditure spreadsheets from September 2005 list the cleanup expenditure as $3,257,798.69. Description of Contamination: Ash piles and surface soils on site were found to contain high levels of metals, including cadmium, chromium, copper, zinc, and lead. Some ash piles also contained low levels of one or more of the following: pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, furans and organics. USEPA found PCBs in the soil as well. Initially, there was concern about the potential of the dioxin contamination, due to the burning of plastics, but only minimal levels of dioxins were found. Likewise, contamination did not affect local groundwater. From November 1992 through May 1 993, USEPA removed more than 10,000 tons of debris from the Franklin Burn site. Sources of Information: EPA Region 2. “Franklin Burn Site Profile.” (n.d.) 18 January 2006. http://ww w.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/0204087c.pdf EPA Region 2

- Newsroom. “EPA Proposes Plan to Address Franklin Township Superfund Site.” 22 August 2001. 18 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/27166bca9a9490ee852570180055e350/818232 5c473ad57e85257169005ff4f6!OpenDocumentAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

191 Naman, Ron (212) 637

- 4375, Interview. 21 November 2005 USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2005. 18 January 2006. USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Franklin Burn.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0204087 USEPA. “USEPA Region 2 Burn #1.” EPA Envirofacts Warehouse . (n.d.). 24 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110007949934Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

192 Site Information Site Name: Griffin Pipe Products Company EPA ID No.: NJD003951985 Address: 1100 West Front Street, Florence, NJ 08518 County: Burlington NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Griffin Pipe Products Company site covers 293 acres and is surrounded by land largely under industrial use. Operations started on site in the early 1900s, when the company was called the Florence Pipe and Foundry Company. In 1963, Griffin Pipe purchased the facility to manufacture ductile iron pipe from scrap material, iron, coke, and various alloy components. Description of Contamination: The manufacturing process produced s ludge containing lead and cadmium. The sludge was deposited into an unlined landfill on site until the mid 1980s, when the company began treating its sludge before disposal in the landfill. The untreated sludge from Griffin Pipe’s manufacturing processes contaminated site soil and groundwater. However, due to the nature of the pollutants, which do not move readily through groundwater, the contaminants are contained mainly in the vicinity of the landfill. Sources of Information: EPA Region 2

- Waste. “Griffin Pipe Products Fact Sheet.” (n.d.) 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/waste/fsgriffi.htm USEPA. “Amsted Industries Griffin Pipe Products.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.) 18 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000321633 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Amsted Industries Griffin Pipe Products.” 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=NJD003951985 Additional Contacts: NJ DEP Division of Solid & Hazardous Waste Records Center, (609) 777

- 3373 Clifford Ng (EPA Region 2 Contact) (212) 637

- 4113, ng.clifford@epa.gov Jonathan Berg (NJDEP Case Manager) (609) 633

- 0737Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

193 Site Informatio n Site Name: Horseshoe Road EPA ID No.: NJD980663678 Address: Sayreville, NJ 08872 County: Middlesex NPL Site: Final: 9/29/1995 In CERCLIS Database: 0200781 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The former chemical processing site includes three areas: (1) the Horseshoe Road Drum Dump; (2) the former Atlantic Development Corporation facility; and (3) the Sayreville Pesticide Dump. These three areas have been grouped together as one site on the National Priorities List (NPL) based on their close proximity and the assumption that the contaminants are commingled and threatening the same resources. The former Atlantic Resources Corporation site is also located on Horseshoe Road and has been included in the site remedial investigation.
The site was discovered in 1981, when a brush fire at the Horseshoe Road Drum Dump exposed approximately 70 partially filled drums containing acetonitrile, silver cyanide and ethyl acetate. The Horseshoe Road Drum Dump was used for disposal from 1972 into the early 1980s. The Sayreville Pesticide Dump was also used for disposal from about 1957 into the early 1980s. The Atlantic Development Corp. facility contained three buildings that were owned or leased by many companies during the years of operation. His torical aerial photography indicates that the area was developed in the early 1950s and operated into the early 1980s. The operations included the production of roofing materials (coal tar and asbestos), sealants, polymers, urethane and epoxy resins, resin pigments, wetting agents, pesticide intermediates, and recycled chlorinated solvents. The Atlantic Development Corp. recycled precious metals and perhaps solvents between 1972 and 1985. Twice during the winter of 1986

- 87, mercury spilled onto the ground . In March 1987, USEPA used CERCLA emergency funds to remove 70 pounds of mercury and contaminated soil to a hazardous waste facility regulated under Subtitle C of RCRA. USEPA also removed 30 5

- gallon containers of sodium cyanide, which was used in the metal recycling process. Description of Contamination: In 1989, USEPA analyzed the site soils and found that the soils contained volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi

- VOCs, base

- neutral compounds, heavy metals, pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PC Bs). The sediments and surface water onsite are contaminated with VOCs, heavy metals, and pesticides. The site contains wetland areas, and there are additional off

- site wetlands that have been impacted by site contaminants. The Horseshoe Road drum dump contained approximately 70 drums, many corroded and some labeled cyanide. Atlantic Development Corp. owned the land where several companies manufactured, processed, and blended various chemicals. During 1975

- 82, the New Jersey Department of EnvironmentalAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

194 Protection (NJDEP) took numerous legal actions against the companies. In mid

- 1980, NJDEP removed over 1,000 drums from the area after the companies failed to do so. NJDEP analyses of soil samples in 1985 detected VOCs (including toluene), semi

- vocs, and heav y metals. USEPA soil analyses in 1989 detected similar hazardous substances, plus pesticides and PCBs. In an April 1991 onsite inspection, USEPA found 400 5

- gallon containers holding solids and semisolids of various colors. Most containers were open, and m any were crushed as a result of a fire in 1983. Sayreville Pesticide Dump is an abandoned property now in the custody of the State. In the April 1991 inspection, USEPA found at least 160 corroded or crushed drums, many containing a white powder. NJDEP's 1985 analyses detected benzene, ethylbenzene, and toluene in soil. USEPA's 1989 analyses detected 1,2,4

- trichlorobenzene, copper, and mercury. Surface water and sediments in a small stream originating near the Sayreville Pesticide Dump contain heavy metal s (copper, lead, and mercury), phenol, bis (2

- chloroethyl) ether, methoxychlor, lindane, chloroform, and 1,2

- dichloroethane, according to USEPA's 1989 analyses. Hard clams are harvested from Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, coastal tidal waters within 15 mi les downstream of the site. Wetlands on and off the site are also threatened. Since 1987, the USEPA has removed 70 pounds of mercury and contaminated soil and 30 5

- gallon containers of sodium cyanide, used in the metal recycling process. To date, the potentially responsible parties (PRPs) have either declined to perform any of the work required at the site, or have been financially incapable of doing so. Therefore, most of the work has been conducted using federal funds. The September 1, 2000 Record of Decision estimates that the selected remedy costs will be $863,890 for the Atlantic Development Corp. site and $522,021 for the Horseshoe Road site, for a total of $1,385,911. Sources of Information: EPA Region 2. “NPL Fact Sheet: Horseshoe Road.” (n.d. ) 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/0200781c.pdf USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Horseshoe Road.” 1 September 2000. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0200510.pdf USEPA. “Horseshoe Road Sites.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.) 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110015014143 USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Horseshoe Road.” 29 September 1995. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar1373.htm USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Horseshoe Road.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0200781Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

195 Additional Contacts: Peter Capitano (On

- Scene Coordinator) (908) 321

- 6621 John Osolin (Remedial Project Manager) (212) 637

- 4412Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

196 Site Information Site Name: Li ghtman Drum Company EPA ID No.: NJD014743678 Address: Route 73, Winslow Township, NJ 08009 County: Camden NPL Site: Final: 10/22/1999 In CERCLIS Database: 200280 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Lightman Drum Company acquired the site in 1974 and recycled both full and empty drums until operations ceased in 1988. The facility sometimes received full drums which required emptying before they could be cleaned and recycled. An on

- site pit was used to dispose of the contents. After a complaint and legal action, the company agreed to upgrade its disposal technique and a 1977 inspection revealed the presence of 5000

- gallon underground storage tanks on the property. The facility accepted chemical powders, pesticides, waste oils, emulsi ons, oil sludges, paint, pigment, ink residues, ketones, alcohols, mixed solvents, acids, and alkalis. Recycling operations ceased at the site, following a 1988 Administrative Order that found significant contamination of hazardous substances as a result of the company’s operations. Though these recycling operations no longer occur, United Cooperage is currently buying and selling used drums at the location. In March 2000, USEPA sent out 32 letters to potentially responsible parties (PRP) who may have c ontributed to the contamination at the Site and may be liable for costs of the response actions. In November 2000, sixteen PRPs signed an Administrative Order on Consent to perform the remedial investigation and feasibility study at the site. USEPA expects that the ongoing remedial investigation and feasibility study will be completed in late 2006. Description of Contamination : Between 1987 and 1988, both New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) and Lightman Drum Company conducted sampling that revealed the soil at the site was contaminated with various volatile and semi

- volatile organic compounds, metals, and pesticides. Lightman Drum Company subsequently conducted a Remedial Investigation that revealed the ground water at the site was al so contaminated. Sources of Information : Mitchell, Tanya. (212) 637

- 4362, Interview. 21 November 2005. USEPA. “Lightman Drum Co. Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.) 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009299437 USEPA. “NPL Site Fact Sheet: Lightman Drum Company.” (n.d.) 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/superfund/npl/0200280c.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

197 USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Lightman Drum Company.” 22 October 1999. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npls nl/n0200280.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Lightman Drum Company.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csiti nfo.cfm?id=0200280Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

198 Site Information Site Name: Martin Aaron, Inc. EPA ID No.: NJD014623854 Address: 1542 South Broadway, Camden, NJ 08104 County: Camden NPL Site: Final 8/23/1999 In CERCLIS Database: 0200278 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The Martin Aaron, Inc. site has been used by a variety of companies for more than 100 years. Kifferty Morocco Manufacturing Co. operated a tannery at the site from 1887 until 1908. The site was bought by Castle Kid Co. , which manufactured glazed leathers until it was seized for tax delinquency in 1940. The site was then bought by Benjamin Schmerling and leased to H. Preston Lowden Co. for wool and hai r blending and American Chain and Cable Co. for manufacturing. Martin Aaron purchased the property in 1968 and operated a drum reconditioning facility on site until 1987. Martin Aaron purchased solvent

- contaminated drums, reconditioned the drums, and then resold the clean drums. Rhodes Drum and Westfall Ace (WADCO) bought the business in 1985, while Martin Aaron maintained ownership of the property, and ran similar drum reconditioning businesses that operated separately on site. WADCO ran its drum reconditioning operation from 1985 through 1994 when it was liquidated in bankruptcy proceeding; Rhodes Drum ran its operation from 1985 through 1998. All three companies were RCRA

- permitted facilities. During these various reconditioning operations, “empty” drums were turned upside down and allowed to drain into tanks . After this, the drums were pressure washed, steam

- rinsed and dried, sand

- blasted, inspected for integrity, and repainted. The residues from drum contents, rinseate , and steam blow

- down were drained from tanks and floor drains into skimming basins. Sludge was skimmed from the b asins for off

- site disposal, and the acidic water was neutralized and reused in the plant. The process also generated baghouse dust (from sand

- blasting) and spray paint wastes. On October 24, 2005, USEPA announced that it plans to clean up contamination i n the soil and ground water at this site. Under the plan, USEPA will excavate contaminated soil, treat it if necessary, and dispose of the excavated soil off site. Some of the site will be covered with a cap, and future uses of the site will be restricte d to ensure that the capped area is not disturbed. Ground water will be pumped to the surface, cleaned up , and then discharged into the sewer system. As of September 30, 2004, cleanup expenditure at this site was $2,127,078.29. Description of Contamination : From 1981 through 1995, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP ) and USEPA cited operators for numerous violations, including unpermitted discharges, non

- notification of spills and releases, and improper handling, storage, and dispo sal of drums. Site operators used the outdoor paved and unpaved areas of the property for drum storage. Holes were dug throughout the property for the disposal of wastes.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

199 Between 200 and 1,000 containers of waste were buried onsite. According to NJDEP, chemical wastes were illegally disposed of as late as March 1999. In 1997, NJDEP initiated a remedial investigation (RI) , using state funds, for both soil and groundwater to determine the nature and extent of contamination at the site. The NJDEP RI so il results showed that both surface and subsurface soil contamination including chlorinated and aromatic volatile organic compounds (VOCs ) , semi

- VOCs consisting mainly of poly

- aromatic hydrocarbons, metals, pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs ) w ere widespread throughout the Martin Aaron property. The RI found groundwater contamination in both shallow and some of the deeper monitoring wells installed on the property. In 1999, NJDEP requested that USEPA take the lead in completing studies of the contamination on the site. USEPA ’s findings revealed that soil contaminated with VOCs and arsenic is contaminating ground water. The on

- site and off

- site damage is extensive, resulting from improper handlin g of solvent

- contaminated drums; improperly desi gned drum drainage systems, ; leaking and dumping of solvents into soil, grou ndwater, and wastewater streams; and illegal burial of contaminated drums on site. Sources of Information Austin, Mark (RPM) (212) 637

- 3954, Interview

. 20 June 2005. EPA Region 2

- News. “EPA to clean up superfund site in Camden county.” 24 October 2005. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/news/2005/05120.htm EPA Region 2. “Superfund Program Proposed Pl an for Martin Aaron Superfund Site.” July 2005. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/martin_aaron_proposal2005.pdf USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). September 30, 2004. 18 January 2006. USEPA. “Martin Aaron Inc.” CERCLIS. 27 O ctober 2005. 18 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursi tes/csitinfo.cfm?id=0200278 USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Martin Aaron.” (n. d .)

. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/0200278c.pdf USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative f or Martin Aaron, Inc.” 22 July 1999. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar1559.htm USEPA. “Superfund Redevelopment Program: Martin Aaron.” July 2000. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle/pilot/facts/r2_12.htmAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

200 Site Information: Site Name: Matteo Iron and Metal EPA ID No.: NJD991304072 Address: 17 08 Route 130, Thorofare, NJ 08086 County: Gloucester NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0204061 Description of Recycling Operation: A scrap metal recycling facility currently operates at the northeast portion of this site. Prior to its purchase by Matteo Iron and Metal , the property was a farm. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP ) has conducted numerous inspections of the site dating back to the early 1970s. During these inspections , it was noted that portions of the property had been used to landfill domestic and industrial waste. In addition, it has been reported that the current operator recycled vehicle batteries and landfilled the battery casings near Hessian Run. Reviews of historical aerial photographs have confirmed th at significant disturbances occurred at this area in the past. Funding sources for the site include the 1986 Bond Fund ($87,000) and the Corporate Business Tax ($1,102,000). Description of Contamination : A site inspection conducted by NJDEP in1991 revealed partially crushed 55

- gallon drums containing various materials that appeared to be waste petroleum product. Preliminary sampling has confirmed that the soil and ground water at the site and the sediments in Hessian Run are contaminated with organic compounds and lead. Contaminates in the soil included petroleum hydrocarbons, lead, arsenic, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs )

. Sources of Information : New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. “NJ Publicly Funded Cleanups Site Status Report 2003 : Matteo Iron & Metal.” 2003. 15 January 2006. http://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/publications/site_status/2003/pdf/gloucester.pdf New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. “Site Remediation and Waste Management: Matteo Iron & Metal.” 5 October 2004. 18 January 2006. http://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/community/sites/pi/026178.htm USEPA. “Matteo & Sons, Inc.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 18 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0204061Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

201 Site Information Site Name: Old Bridge Chemicals, Inc. / Madison Industries, Inc. EPA ID No.: NJD002460855 / NJD002460855 Address: Old Waterworks Rd, Old Bridge, NJ 08857 County: Middlesex NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Old Bridge Chemicals, Inc. (OBC) and Madison Industries, Inc. (Madison) operate at the same location at Old Waterworks Road. The property is owned by Arnet Realty Company. Operations began at this site in 1964 and approximately 5 acres are active. The site produces copper sulfate, zinc sulfate, zinc chloride, etchants , and iron enrichment additives. The company claimed it conducted recycling at the facility using materials generated at the site (filter press material from the zinc sulfate and zinc chloride processes and from the wastewater treatment plant operations and off

- specification copper products) to produce a “micronutrient fertilizer

. ” A pile of this material existed at the site from at least December 1989 until August 1995 , when it was removed by court order . It was found to be hazardous for lead and cadmium toxicity based on sampling, with results as high as 40 ppm and 300 ppm, respectively. Through 1992, p ortions of the pile were sold to out

- of

- state fertilizer manufacturers for incorporation into its products. The pile was maintained outside, exposed to the elements, and thus was susceptible to moisture and dispersion by wind and precipitation. Discharges to the environment from the pile were observed and documented by the NJDEP in June1993 , September 199 3, and February 1994

. As of November 2001 this site did not hold a RCRA Part B permit. Description of Contamination : In 1995, a pile of micronutrient fertilizer was removed and found to be hazardous for lead and cadmium toxicity, with results as high as 40 ppm and 300 ppm, respectively. A report prepared in July 1996 by Amy S. Greene Environmental Consultants, Inc. for Madison revealed elevated levels of zinc and copper in the leaves within four stressed zones to the west of the site. Groundwater at this site is contaminated with heavy metals, which were identified by NJ DEP. Sources of Information: EPA Region 2. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 31 October 2005. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. “New Jersey Superfund Sites on the National Priorities List as of June 30, 2001.” Site Remediation Program. 9 January 2002. 20 October 2006. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/srp/publications/site_status/2000/html/superfun.htm USEPA. “Old Bridge Chemicals, Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 18 January 2006. http://oas pub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000756469Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

202 USEPA. “Old Bridge Chemicals, Inc.” RCRAInfo. 26 November 2001. 20 January 2006. USEPA. “ RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Old Bridge Metals and Chemicals.” 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006

. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=NJD052204864 Additional Contacts: Susan Gieser (Public Contact) , (732) 727

- 2225Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

203 S ite Information: Site Name: Pittsburgh Metal & Equipment EPA ID No.: NJD000540062 or NJD981490295 Address: 41

- 59 Aetna Street (Foot), Jersey City, NJ 07302 County: Hudson NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0201097 Description of Recycling O peration: This site was a former smelting facility that operated for approximately 35 years. It received used metal and dross from a number of clients, including those in the printing industries. This site did not hold a RCRA Part B permit. Descripti on of Contamination : USEPA confirmed contamination at the s ite as high as 15 percent lead in the top two feet of soil. Other hazardous substances at the site include cadmium, antimony, beryllium, copper, nickel, silver, zinc, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs )

. As a result of the release or threatened release of hazardous substances, USEPA has undertaken response action s at or in connection with the site under S ection 104 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9604. Under the terms of the Agreement, the de minimis settli ng p arties will pay approximately $370,000.00 to reimburse USEPA for clean up costs. incurred at the Site. In addition, a New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection document lists USEPA emergency cleanup costs as $2,864,000 in 2000

. Sources of Addi tional Information: Federal Register (Volume 70, Number 97) Page 29312

- 29313. “Proposed Settlement Under Section 122(g) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Regarding the Pittsburgh Metal and Equipment Superfund Site, Jersey City, NJ.” 20 May 2005. 24 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA

- WASTE/2005/May/Day

- 20/f10147.htm New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. “NJ Publicly Funded Cleanups Site Status Report 2000: Remedial Action/Construction projects completed in 2000.” 18 January 2006. http://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/publications/ site_status/2000/html/2000intro05.htm USEPA. “Pittsburgh Metals & Graphics.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006

. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cf m?id=0201097 USEPA. “Pittsburgh Metals & Graphics.” RCRAInfo . 26 November 2001. 20 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

204 Site Information Site Name: Safety

- Kleen Envirosystems Company EPA ID No.: NJD002153922 Address: 600 Doremus Avenue, Newark, NJ 07105 County: Essex NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Safety

- Kleen Envirosystems Company site is located on approximately 9.5 acres in a heavily industrialized area of Newark, New Jersey. During the 1800s , the site was part of the Balbach Smelting and Refining Corporation Works, which refined lead and copper. The refining operations ceased in 1938 and ownership was transferred to the City of Newark. It was inactive until purchased in 1952 by the Kolker Chemical Company, which manufactured chemicals at the location, including chlorine, methylene chloride, methyl chloride, chloroform , and plasticizers. In 1974, Inland Chemical Corporation purchased the property, phasing out chemical manufacturing and initiating solvent recovery operations in 1975. In 1976, the southern portion of the property was sold to Darling International for rendering of animal byproducts. Inland and McKesson Envirosystems Company merged in 1981. In October 1982, an explosion and fire destroyed much of the operations at the site and it has been inactive and vacant ever since. In 1987, Safety

- Kleen Corporation acquired the stock of McKesson and renamed the company Safety

- Kleen Envirosystems. In 1982, McKesson Envirosystem Company entered into an Administrative Consent Order with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) for investigations of the site. Subsequent investigations and inspections identified many areas of concern . In 1993, Safety

Kleen Envirosystems Company and Bristol

- Myers Squibb Company (which shipped waste to the site) entered into an Administrative Consent Order with NJDEP to conduct remedial investigations and remedial measures, if necessary. This site does not hold a RCRA Part B permit. Description of Contamination : Due to poor manufacturing operation and maintenance practices, the site’s soil and groundwater are contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and volatile and semi

- volatile organics, such as methylene chloride, vinyl chloride , chloroform, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, cis

- 1,2 Dichloroethylene and xylenes. Contamination of soil and groundwater includes PCBs, volatile, and semi

- volatile organics. Some contamination occurred after 1982, and the facility was closed 2 days after the explosion and subsequent fire. The cost of clean up has amounted to $2.75 million for groundwater remedy and $1.76 million for soil remedy

.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

205 Sources of Information: Abdellatif, Sameh (212) 637

- 4103, Interview

. 1 November 2005. EPA Region 2. “Hazardous Waste Cleanup Site Fact Sheet: Safety

- Kleen Envirosystems Co.” 3 November 2005.18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/waste/njstate.htm EPA Region 2. “Hazardous Waste Cl eanup Site Fact Sheet: Safety

- Kleen Envirosystems.” 3 November 2005.18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/waste/fssafene.pdf USEPA. “McKesson Envirosystems Co.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. 18 January 2006. 18 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Safety

- Kleen Envirosystems, Inc.” RCRAInfo . 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=NJD002153922 USEPA. “Safety

- Kleen Envirosystems.” RCRAInfo . 26 November 2001. Additional Contacts: NJ DEP, Division of Solid & Hazardous Waste Records Center, 401 E. State Street, 6th Floor, Trenton, NJ 08625, (609) 777

- 3373 Sameh Abdell atif (EPA Region 2 Contact) , (212) 637

- 4103, abdellatif.sameh@epa.gov Mark Walters , (609) 633

- 1486Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

206 Site Information: Site Name: South Brunswick Asphalt EPA ID No.: NJD986630747 Address: Gladney Avenue, Berkley, NJ 08721 County: Ocean NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0203669 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The South Brunswick Asphalt facility makes asphalt and recycles asphalt wastes, concrete , and tree stumps. Since 1983, a large quantity of coal tar emulsion wastes mixed with san d and gravel were stockpiled on site in an unpaved and unbermed outdoor area. Other environmental concerns at the South Brunswick Asphalt site include an inactive landfill area, abandoned drums, three waste oil lagoons , and discarded electri cal transformers. Funding sources include a corporate business tax ($845,000) and hazardous discharge site cleanup fund ($150,000)

. Description of Contamination : Preliminary sampling conducted by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP ) in 1990 and 1992 confirmed that the soil and ground water at the property were contaminated with various chlorinated and non

- chlorinated volatile organic compounds and semi

- volatile organic compounds. Sources of Information: USEPA. “South Brunswi ck Asphalt.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006

. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0203669 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. “NJ Publicly Funded Cleanups Site Status Report 2003 : South Brunswick Asphalt.” 9 January 2002. 20 October 2006. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/srp/publications/s ite_status/2003/pdf/ocean.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

207 Site Information: Site Name: Zschiegner Refining Co. EPA ID No.: NJD986643153 Address: 1442 Maxim

- Southard Road, Howell Township, NJ 07731 County: Monmouth NPL Site: Final : 3/6/1998 In CERCLIS Database: 0203757 S ite History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Zschiegner Refining Company operated from 1964 to 1992 as a precious metals recovery facility. On

- site operations included chemical stripping of precious metals, including gold, silver, platinum , an d nickel from watch bands, film, and electrical components. In October 1992, the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration raided the facility based on suspicions of illegal drug manufacturing and found the facility owner had been manufacturing methamphetami ne. Approximately 3,000 different chemicals (including peroxide, cyanide, caustics, and acids) were found improperly stored throughout the site.
A USEPA August 2004 proposed Superfund Cleanup Plan estimates total co sts at the site to be $6.7 million. Description of Contamination : Operations at the site resulted in contamination of the building, soil, sediment, ground water, and adjacent wetlands with arsenic, chromium and cyanide. Former employees of the site have noted that spent acid solutions, too weak for "stripping" metals, were regularly decanted into floor drains or emptied by hose. During initial removal actions, approximately 2,000 gallons of acidic solutions, 1,600 gallons of basic solutions, and 1,400 small containers of hazardous substance s were transferred to acceptable containers and disposed of off site. The presence of organic and inorganic contamination in soil, sediments, surface water, and ground water, and inorganic contamination in the building, was found during the remedial investigation. Herbert Zschiegner pled guilty on April 26, 1995, to illegally dumping chemicals into a Monmouth County brook and adjacent wetlands from 1990 to 1992. Zschiegner admitted to violating three counts of the Clean Water Act by illegally discharging, without a permit, acids, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, zinc , and iron from his metals recovery operation into the Haystack Brook and surrounding wetlands between January 1990 and October 31, 1992. On September 28, 1995, Zschiegner was sentenced to 16 months in jail on each of the three counts and 3 years probation. As part of his plea agreement and sentence, Zschiegner is also required to pay $650,000 to the USEPA as partial restitution for the costs incurred by the Agency in cleaning up the former business site. Sources of Information: EPA Region 2. “August 2004 Superfund Proposed Plan: Zschiegner Refining Co.” 24 August 2004. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa .gov/region02/superfund/npl/zschienger_proposal_plan.htmAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Jersey

208 EPA Region 2

- Newsroom. “EPA Proposes Cleanup Plan for Howell Superfund Site.” 24 August 2004. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/news/2004/04132.htm EPA Region 2

- Superfund. “ EPA to Clean Up Howell Superfund Site.” 13 October 2004. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/news/2004/04157.htm
New Jer sey Department of Environmental Protection. “NJ Publicly Funded Cleanups Site Status Report 2003 : Monmouth County Index of Sites.” p. 17. (n.d.) 20 October 2006. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/srp/publications/site_status/2003/pdf/monmouth.pdf New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services. Public Health Assessment: Zschiegner Refining Co.” 1 July 1999. 18 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/zschiegner/zsc_toc.html USEPA. “NPL Site Fact Sheet: Zschiegner Refining.” (n. d .) 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/0203757c.pdf USEPA. “ Superfund Site Progress Profile for Zschiegner Refining.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006

. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa .gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0203757 USEPA. “Zschiegner Refining.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/mu ltisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110004239280 Additional Contacts: Stephanie Vaughn (Project Manager), (212) 637

- 1866 or vaughn.stephanie@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Mexico

209 Site Information Site Name: Cal West Metals EPA ID No.: NMD097960272 Address: I

- 25 & US 60 & 85 W Frontag e, Lemitar, NM 87823 County: Socorro NPL Site: Deleted:12/20/1996 In CERCLIS Database: 0604050 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Cal West Metals site is located one - half mile northwest of Lemitar and approximately 8 miles north of Socorro in Socorro County, New Mexico . The site is bounded on the east by a frontage road for US Interstate 25. The Interstate is located approximately 250 feet east of the site. Land use is predominantly agricultural and residential. There are three households located within 1,100 feet south of the site. The Cal West Metals site is a former battery breaking and recycling facility. The Cal West property includes approximately 43.8 acres, of which 12.5 acres are fenced. Site operations were located within the fenced area. The site consisted of two evaporation ponds, three facility buildings, earth berms, soil and battery waste piles, a concrete surface pad, and a salvage area. Albert and James LaPoint operated the Cal West Metal battery recycling facility and secondary lead smelter. From 1979 to 1981, the facility processed an estimated 20,000 automobile batteries to recover lead, plastics, and hard rubber components for commercial sale. Lead acid batteries were crushed on site and the batteries were separated into plastics, hard rubber, and lead oxides. Floatation and centrifugation in a rotating separator drum separated the plastics, hard rubber, and lead fraction. Water was recycled through the separator drum and ultimately discharged to the lined pon d along with waste sludge. After the discharge line became plugged, sludge was disposed of on the concrete surface pad adjacent to the cotton gin building. From the start of operations to approximately 1989, p iles of crushed battery components, in variou s stages of separation, were stored outdoors. The broken battery piles were stored inside the central building and stockpiled on the concrete pad adjacent (west) to this building. Cal West has been the subje ct of numerous state and f ederal investigations and regulatory actions since 1979. From 1981 through 1989, preliminary investigations were conducted by NMED, USEPA , and the LaPoints. Description of Contamination : Elevated levels of lead were found in soil, sediment, and groundwater. The primary contaminants of concern affecting the battery waste piles, soil, sediment, and debris are organics, including polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs ) and metals, including arsenic and lead. In addition, about 300 drums containing lead oxide and sulfuric acid were identified. In August 1986, USEPA issued an order to the owner/operators under Section 3008(a) of RCRA for failure to operate and maintain the facility in compliance with RCRA hazardous waste management requirements.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Mexico

210 The selected remedial action for this site included excavating, consolidating, and treating an estimated 15,000 cubic yards of contaminated battery waste materials, soil, and sediment on site. The remediation efforts included using stabilization/solidification; disposing of the treated materi als in the southwest corner of the fenced area and capping the disposal area with cement and a 12

- inch soil cover; decontaminating onsite buildings and equipment; and sampling ground water. The estimated present worth cost for this remedial action, accordi ng to a September 1992 Superfund Record of Decisio n was $1,557,000, which included an annual maintenance cost of $5,000 for 30 years. Sources of Information: EPA Region 6. “Cal West Metals Superfund Site Profile.” 13 January 2006. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6sf/pdffiles/0604050.pdf Hendricks, Ashley and Sara Lubchenco. “Analysis and Remediation Plan for Lead Contamination at the Cal West Site in Lemitar, NM.” L & H Environmental Engineering. (n.d.)

. 18 January 2006. http://www.ees.nmt.edu/EPSCoR/GIS_class/Ashley&SaraL.doc USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Cal West Metals (USSBA).” 13 March 1989. 1 8 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0604050.pdf USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Cal West Metals (USSBA).” 29 September 1992. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0692077.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Cal West Metals (USSBA).” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0604050

Additional Contacts: Sairam Appaji (RPM) , (214) 665

- 3126 Ladonna Walker (SAM) , (214) 665

- 6666 Don Williams (RPM) , (214) 665

- 2197Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Mexico

211 Site Information Site Name: Pagano Salvage EPA ID No.: NMD980749980 Address: Los Lunas, NM 87031 County: Valencia NPL Site: Deleted: 10/14/1992 In CERCLIS Database: 0600907 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Pagano Salvage Site covers 1.25 acres near the east bank of the Rio Grande. In 1983, Pagano Salvage purchased electric transformers/capacitors and other scrap metals containing polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB )

- contaminated oil from Sandia National Laboratories, a U.S. Department of Energy facility in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Pagano Salvage removed the oil, poured it over insulated wire, and burned off the insulation to recover the metal. The burning took place on unprotected ground at several locations. Si te inspections in 1984, 1985, and 1986 revealed several areas of soil contamination in the yard due to leaks from scrap materials, which released PCB

- contaminated oil into the soil. These areas included two surface burn areas, a stained soil area, and a s urface pool of oil. Description of Contamination : When the facility ceased operations, 62 drums containing oil remained on site. On

- site soil samples collected by USEPA in March 1987 contained high concentrations of two PCBs: Aroclor 1254 at 1,400 parts p er million (ppm), and Aroclor 1260 at 910 ppm. Pesticides were also detected: DDT at 40 parts per billion (ppb) and DDE at 17 ppb. Contaminants were detected to a depth of 4 feet. All of these contaminants were also detected in on - site soil collected in No vember 1985. Local conditions facilitated movement of contaminants into ground water. On June 8, 1989, USEPA issued a CERCLA Section 106 Administrative Order requiring a number of parties potentially responsible for wastes associated with the site to c onduct a removal action. The parties declined , but proposed to fund the action, estimated to cost $1.5 million. Over 5,100 tons of soil and debris were removed from the site. Sources of Information: USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Pagano Salvag e.” 27 September 1990. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0690058.pdf USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Pagano Salvage.” 12 January 2006. 18 January 2006

. http://www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6sf/pdffiles/0600907.pdf USEPA. “Pagano Salvage Yard.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_lis t?facility_uin=110010646024Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New Mexico

212 USEPA. “ Superfund Site Progress Profile for Pagano Salvage.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursite s/csitinfo.cfm?id=0600907 Additional Contacts: Ladonna Walker (SAM) , (214) 665

- 6666 Don Williams (RPM) , (214) 665

- 2197Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

213 Site Information Site Name: Back Waste Oil EPA ID No.: NYN000204415 Address: 704 County Road 30A, Central Bridge, NY 12035 County : Schoharie NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0204415 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The site is a former machine shop. Over the years , the owner has been accumulating thousands of gallons of waste oil, solvents, paint, and other types of ignitable fluids from his own sources, as well as from unknown individuals who left containers of chemicals at his site. These materials were intended to be used as supplemental fuel by the owner in a small heater inside the machine shop. Havin g been out of business for the past 15 years, the waste fluids have been accumulating on the site. Description of Contamination : In addition to the more than 5,000 gallons of waste oil and other ignitable fluids, there are approximately 40 compressed ga s cylinders of various sizes and a partially filled 300 gallon propane tank. Inside the shop area, in addition to the containers of ignitable wastes, the owner has two boxes of live .50 caliber military ammunition. The rear garage door is missing, which allows for unrestricted access to the building. There are no operating fire or smoke detectors, nor is there a fire alarm system. There are visible signs of waste oil spillage onto the soil. Sources of Information: USEPA. “Back Waste Oil.” CERCLIS. 12 Octob er 2006

. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0204415 USEPA. “Back Waste Oil.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110013799425 USEPA. “Back Waste Oil.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n. d .)

. 19 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/wasteoil Additional Contacts: Paul Kahn (OSC) , kahn.paul@epamail.epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

214 Site Information Site Name: Bern Metals EPA ID No.: RCRAInfo: NYD986910057, CERCLIS: NYD013703632 Address: 22 Bender Ave, Buffalo, NY 14206

- 2803 County: Erie NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0202697 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The Bern/Universal Metals site on the east side of Buffalo was used as a scrap metal processing center for almost 50 years until it was closed in the late 1980s. The state began its involvement in the case in the late 1980s. In 1992, USEPA excavated some contaminated soil, removed barrels, provided soil cover on part of the property and put up fencing. Because the site owners were deceased, the state initiated a proceeding against companies identified as contributing to pollution at the site. Six entities that sent toxic materi al to the site have agreed to conduct cleanup activities at the site which are estimated to cost $1.86 million. The entities include Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, Niagara Frontier Transit Metro System, Inc., Honeywell International Inc., Natio nal Fuel Gas Distribution Corp., General Motors Corporation, and New York State Electric and Gas Corporation. According to a 2002 Federal Register Notice, Consolidated Railroad owned a portion of the site and agreed to pay $300,000. Description of Contamination: Soil at the five

- acre site is heavily contaminated with lead, battery acid and other toxic substances. Sources of Information: Federal Register (Volume 67, Number 53). Page 12573. “Notice of Lodging of Partial Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as Amended.” 19 March 2002. 25 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA

- WASTE/2002/March/Day

- 19/f 6280.htm Office of New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. “Agreement Speeds Cleanup of Buffalo Toxic Site.” 19 July 2002. 19 January 2006. http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2002/jul/jul19a_02.html USEPA. “Bern Metals.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 19 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0202697 Additional Con tacts: Chait Agnihotri (OSC), (908) 906

- 6908Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

215 Site Information: Site Name: Consolidated Iron and Metal EPA ID No.: NY0002455756 Address: East End of Washington St., Newburgh, NY 12550 County: Orange NPL Site: Final: 6/14/2001 In CERCLIS Databas e: 0204175 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Consolidated Iron and Metal (Consolidated) was a car and scrap metal dealer, processor/recycler, and storage facility that operated from 1960 through 1999, when it closed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) due to numerous violations. The facility received whole automobiles; automobile engines, transmissions, and batteries; keypunch machines; computer parts; white goods (appliances); and transformers. The 7

- acre consolidated site is bordered by a boat marina on one side and the Hudson River on another. The facility included a staging area and smelter, a compactor and metal shear, an office, a scale, and a garage. Scrap metal and tire piles were also foun d on site. Smelting operations occurred on site between 1975 and 1995. Primarily, the smelter was used to melt aluminum transmissions into a reusable product, but other metallic materials were smelted as well, resulting in lead

- contaminated ash/slag. Oth er on - site operations included sorting ferrous and non

- ferrous metal scrap for recycling, and baling and shearing large pieces of metal

– including whole cars

– into smaller pieces for transport. Mismanagement on site led to contamination. From 1997 to 1999, NYSDEC conducted several inspections at the facility. In 1999, USEPA cleanup crews greatly reduced any threats of contamination to nearby areas by disposing of a 4,000 to 6,000 ton pile of ash/slag that contained high levels of lead at an USEPA

- approved facility. The Agency spent $1.5 million on this effort. A clearing operation was conducted by USEPA in 2003. The City of Newburgh has foreclosed on the property. Cleanup at the site has not begun. As of September 30, 2004, cleanup expenditure at this site was $4,376,309.28. Description of Contamination: Contamination was caused by mismanagement of useable scrap metal and processing byproducts. Precautions were not taken to minimize contamination during smelting operations, processing, and storage of scraps. In addition, ash/slag and oil/waste liquids were disposed directly on the property without proper containment, allowing contamination of soil, groundwater, and the Hudson River. Between 1997 and 1999, NYSDEC conducted inspections and sampling at the Consolidated facility. NYSDEC observed oil and other waste liquids on facility soils, as well as storm water being discharged into the Hudson River from the property without the appropriate testing or permits. In 2000, the NYS Attorne y General prosecuted Consolidated for violations, including illegal discharge to surface water without a permit. There were three main causes of site contamination: the metal smelting operation; recycling of scrap metals; and storage of scrapAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

216 metals. An ash/slag pile generated by the smelting operation contained lead at 6,350 mg/kg and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at 27,000 μg/kg. USEPA separated the ash/slag pile into ferrous, non

- ferrous and fine (contaminated) piles, and removed the approximately 6,600

- ton fine pile to a RCRA

- approved treatment, storage, and disposal facility. USEPA removed approximately 2,000 tons of soil and debris, with lead contamination at 4,000 mg/kg and PCB contamination at 39,000 μg/kg. In addition, USEPA removed 30,000 tires, 58 truckloads of scrap metal, and 8,000 gallons of hydraulic oil. On

- site sampling of surface and subsurface soil and groundwater, after removal activities, found significantly elevated levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi

- volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), pesticides, PCBs, and metals, primarily beneath the former slag pile. In addition, contaminants found at elevated levels in the Hudson River included benzopyrene, PCBs, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and zinc. Sources of Information: EPA Region 2

- Newsroom. “EPA Places Sites in East Fishkill and Newburgh on the Federal List of Hazardous Waste Sites.” 11 June 2001. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/new s/2001/01066.htm EPA Region 2

- Newsroom. “EPA Poised to Begin Long

- Term Cleanup at Newburgh Superfund Site” 29 September 2003. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/news/2003/0311 1.htm Negrelli, Mike (RPM) (212) 637

- 4278, Interview. 17 November 2005. USEPA. “Consolidated Iron and Metal.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009260726 USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). September 30, 2004. 19 January 2006. USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Consolidated Iron and Metal.” 14 June 2001. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar1614.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Fact Sheet: Consolidated Iron and Metal.” (n.d.) 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/superfund/npl/0204175c.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Consolidated Iron and Metal.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0204175Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

217 Site Information Site Name: ENRX, Inc. (formerly Voelker Analysis) EPA ID No.: NYD991291782 Address: 766 Babcock St., Buffalo, NY 14206 County: Eri e NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This company was a permitted hazardous waste chlorinate organic recovery facility until the permit was revoked in 1989. The source of contamination is un clear, though the initial recycling process was conducted without secondary containment. This was corrected when ENRX, Inc. acquired the site in 1987. However inventory was not removed from the original building, so leaking drums could have contributed to the contamination. In October 1994, the USEPA announced a proposed settlement with ENRX and Buffalo Warehousing. Both sites violated CERCLA and the settlement was entered into by USEPA and 91 parties. Under the agreement, the parties would pay USEPA $1,006,000, plus interest, to reimburse USEPA for costs incurred at the respective sites. Description of Contamination: Source of contamination is unclear. Leaking drums could have contributed to the contamination. Sources of Information: Federal Register. “Environmental Documents: Proposed Administrative Cost Recovery Agreement Under Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, Regarding the ENRX Site and the Buffalo Warehousing Site, Buffalo, NY. ” 17 October 1994. 25 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA

- WASTE/1994/October/Day

- 17/pr

- 23.html USEPA. “ENRX Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000616682 USEPA. “ENRX Incorporated.” RCRAInfo. 21 November 2000. USEPA Office o f Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. FY 1994 Enforcement And Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report. p. A

- 12. (n.d.) http://www.epa.gov/co mpliance/resources/reports/accomplishments/oeca/fy94accomplish ment.pdf USEPA. “Voelker Analysis Inc.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/sup ercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0202421Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

218 USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. “RCRA Monthly Hotline Report.” October 1994. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hotline/94report/10_94.txt Additional Contacts: Albert Steele, (716) 864

- 7313Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

219 Site Information Site Name: Feldman Barrel & Drum EPA ID No.: NYD013721907 Address: 35 Newell Street, Buffalo, NY 14206 County: Erie NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0204376 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Feldman Barrel & Drum Site is an inactive drum reconditioning facility located at 35 Newell Street in Buffalo, Erie County, New York. The facility is located in a predominately industrial and commercial section of Buffalo; however, there are some residential homes bordering the site to the East. According to the owner/operator, the site has been inactive since May 2001. The owner stated that Feldman Barrel & Drum ceas ed operating when some of their major accounts were terminated. A private citizen called the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) when children found numerous drums and detected an unidentifiable odor inside an abandoned buildi ng on the site. NYSDEC subsequently performed an inspection in June 2002 and found several hundred drums in various stages of deterioration. Drums were found with corrosive and flammable labels. NYSDEC requested response and removal assistance from the USEPA. According to a January 30, 2003 On

- Scene Coordinator (OSC) Pollution Report (4), the total project cleanup is budgeted to cost $780,000. Description of Contamination: In July 2002, USEPA and the Removal Support Team (RST) contractor conducted a preliminary assessment and collected drum, tank, and floor drain samples from within this abandoned drum reconditioning facility. A total of 439 drums, in severe stages of deterioration, were identified within the building, of which an estimated 400

- 420 contained waste materials. A 3,500

- gallon caustic bath tank and a 500

- gallon caustic pre

- flush tank were identified and found to contain a caustic liquid and sludge

- like material. On

- site results detected primarily caustic liquids and sludges (pH 12

- 14) and flammable liquids in a majority of the samples collected. Sources of Information: USEPA. “Feldman Barrel & Drum.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa .gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0204376 USEPA. “Feldman Barrel & Drum.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/mu ltisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110012535319 USEPA. “Feldman Barrel & Drum.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.). 19 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/feldmanbarrel USEPA. “Pollution Report: Feldman Barrel & Drum.” 30 January 2003.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

220 Additional Contacts: Jeff M. Bechtel (OSC), (732) 906

- 6807, bechtel.jeff@epa.gov Cris D’Onofrio (OSC) Bob Moody ( Response Manager), (267) 540

- 0048, rmoody@wrsie.comAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

221 Site Information Site Name: Hudson Technologies Inc. EPA ID No.: NY0001392463 Address: 25 Torne Valley Rd, Hillburn, NY 10931 County: Rockland NPL Site: Proposed: 5/11/2000 In CERCLIS Database: 0204251 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Approximately 3 acres in size, the Hudson Technologies Inc. (HTI) site is an active freon recycling facility engaged primarily in the purification of spent refrigerant. HTI began operations on the site in 1994. The site property is currently owned by Ramapo Land Co. Inc and cleanup efforts are ongoing. Hudson Technologies did not hold a RCRA permit while conducting operations. To date, over $1 million has been spent on cleanup efforts. Description of Contamination: Groundwater is contaminated with Freon 11. A 1995 inspection revealed that floor drains were connected to a dry well. HTI closed off its drains to prevent discharge to the dry well and abandoned its on

- site septic system where the highest concentration of Freon 11 was detected. In 1999, a failed connection hose to one of HTI’s outdoor storage tanks resulted in a spill of approximately 8,000 pounds of Freon 11 to the ground surface. HTI immediately began excavation of the soil impacted by the spill. Groundwater was once again contaminated and two supply wells were taken off

- line. HTI installed a ground water remediation system that consists of a recovery well, air stripping tower, and recharge gallery, which removes the Freon 11 from the impacted well water prior to distribution. An air stripping treatment system, completed in March 2001, removes the Freon 11 from the impacted well water prior to distribution. In the past, these releases forced United Water of New York to close some wells in its public drinking water system. Sources of Information: EPA Region 2

- Newsroom. “EPA Proposes Site in Rockland County Linked to Groundwater Contamination for the Federal List of Hazardous Waste Sites.” 11 May 2000. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/news/2000/00085.htm Malcolm, James (PM) (518) 402

- 9669, Interview 17 November 2005 New York State Department of Health. “Public Health Assessment: Hudson Technologies.” 25 January 2002. 19 January 2006. http://nysl.nysed.gov/uhtbin/cgisirsi/zK37W99vE1/64460137/523/4721 Trocher, Sharon (RPM) (212) 637

- 4261, Interview. 17 November 2005 USEPA. “NPL Site Fact Sheet: Hudson Technologies.” 26 September 2006. 20 October 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/superfund/npl/0204251c.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

222 USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Hudson Techno logies, Inc.” 11 May 2000. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar1590.htm USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile: Hudson Technologies.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 19 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0204251Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

223 Site Information Site Name: Mercury Refining, Inc. EPA ID No.: NYD048148175 Address : Railroad Ave., Colonie, NY 12205 County: Albany NPL Site: Final: 9/8/1983 In CERCLIS Database: 0201552 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: From 1955 to 1998, Mercury Refining, Inc. reclaimed mercury from batteries, thermometers, electrical switches, and other mercury

bearing materials. 1998, the operations were sold to Mercury Waste Solutions who currently operates on site. Operations beginning in 1955 included receiving hazardous waste from off site; storing this waste on site; reclaiming silver and other precious metals; and reclaiming metallic mercury from off

- specification metallic mercury, mercury batteries and other mercury

- bearing wastes. The mercury was reclaimed using retort (condensation) furnaces at the facility. Thi s facility was a commercial hazardous waste facility because hazardous waste was received from off

- site for on

- site storage. The 0.5

- acre property was a “dumping area” covered with thousands of battery casings at depths of at least 3 feet. Mercury Refini ng had a RCRA permit to store mercury, and also had a Corrective Action permit. It received its RCRA B permit in December 1996; however, it expired in December 2001. Currently, the site serves as a facility for the recovery of precious metals. This recl amation process is exempt from RCRA regulation. As of September 30, 2004, cleanup costs amounted to $2,615,392.88. Description of Contamination : Site operators dumped waste batteries behind an on

- site building until 1980. After 1980, these wastes were stored in drums or on wooden pallets on pavement. USEPA required the operators to add a container storage facility rather than dumping waste. Groundwater, sediments, and soils on site are contaminated with heavy metals not limited to mercury, zinc, and lead. Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination also exists. A majority of the contamination at the site is due to two fires which occurred in September 1989 and April 1999. These fires caused mercury to mobilize into the environment, which cau sed runoff into a nearby tributary of the Hudson River. Additionally, atmospheric deposition of mercury is an issue in the on

- site buildings. The company failed to comply with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation orders and corrective action permits, leading to USEPA intervention in 1999. USEPA cannot excavate to remove all the mercury because of a railroad track that runs near the site. Studies are being performed by Mississippi State University to explore the use of electro

- kinetics to assist in site cleanup. Sources of Information: EPA Region 2

- Superfund. “Mercury Refining Company, Inc.” February 2004. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/waste/fsmereco. pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

224 USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 19 January 2006. USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Mercury Waste Solutions.” RCRAInfo . 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=NYD048148175 USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Mercury Refining.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0201552 USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Mercury Refining, Inc.” (n.d.) 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/superfund/npl/0201552c.pdf USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Mercury Refining, Inc.” 8 September 1983. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0201552.pdf Additional Contacts: Tom Taccone (RPM), (212) 637

- 4281Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

225 Site Information Site Name: Revere Smelting and Refining Corporation of NJ EPA ID No.: NYD030485288 Address: 65 Ballard Road, Middletown, NY 10941 County Orange NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Revere Smelting and Refining Corporation of NJ (Revere), a subsidiary of Eco

- Bat NY, LLC, recycles batteries. The site is still in op eration. The 55

- acre Revere site is located in a rural area, with about one

- third of the site used for recycling operations. Revere receives and dismantles used batteries. Dismantled batteries and other wastes are stored in a containment building. Lead

- bearing materials are refined on site in a high temperature smelter. Contamination occurred post

- RCRA, and it is possible that contamination may be occurring presently. A 1995 court ruling noted that Revere had filed staff letters of credit with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the amount of $3,669,665. This facility received a RCRA permit on July 28, 1995. Description of Contamination : In the late 1970s and early 1980s, lead slag, battery pieces, and other lead

- beari ng wastes were buried on site by Revere. Battery dismantling activities leaked acid into soil and groundwater, leaching lead from these buried wastes into the groundwater. Lead

- contaminated fill reaches depths of 20 feet in parts of the Revere site. Other on - site contaminants include cadmium, antimony, and arsenic. In total, approximately 100,000 cubic yards of soil was contaminated. Remediation of site soil and groundwater is underway. Sources of Information: EPA Region 2

- Waste. “Hazardous Waste Cleanup Site Fact Sheet: Revere Smelting and Refining Corporation of NJ.” November 2003. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/waste/fsrevere.pdf New York Department of Environmental Conservation. “Revere Smelting and Refining Corp Ruling June 20, 1995.” 20 June 1995. 19 January 2006. http://www.dec.state.ny.us/website/ohms/decis/reverer.htm Stein, Carol (EPA Region 2) (212) 637

- 4181, Interview. 17 November 2005. USEPA. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. “Documentation of Environmental Indicator Determination: Revere Smelting and Refining Corporation.” 30 September 2004. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/waste/rever725.pdf USEPA. “Revere Smelting & Refining Corporation.” RCRAInfo . 20 July 2001.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling New York

226 https://rtnccisland.rtpnc.epa.gov/rcrainfo/permitting/PMT_series_upd.asp?msg_seriesseq =1 Additional Contacts: Paul Patel (NYSDEC Case Manager), (518) 402

- 8594, appatel@gw.dec.state.ny.us Keith Gronwald (NYSDEC Case Manager), (518) 402

- 8594, khgronwald@gw.dec.state.ny.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling North Carolina

227 Site Information Site Name: Battery Tech (Duracell

- Lexington) EPA ID No.: NCD000648402 Address: 305 New Highway 64 E, Lexington, NC 27292 County: Davidson NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0402542 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This 27.5

- acre battery manufacturing facility that is currently owned and operated by the Gillette Company, corporate owner of Duracell. The site began operating in the 1950s. Previous owners/operators at the site , including P.R. Mallory and Duracell, manufactured mercuric oxide batteries, as well as dry cells for commercial and industrial use. Over the years, several plant operations have been added to the site to expand production. The operating facility consis ts of three main buildings. Plant #1 is a battery cell assembly operation where chemicals are mixed and laced into containers to make batteries. Plant #2 was the building where mercuric oxide was formulated from 1977 to 1986. Mercury reclamation operatio ns also took place on the east side of this plant from 1977 to 1986. Plant #2 was demolished and removed from the site in 1995. Plant #3 was purchased in 1976 and is utilized for testing, packaging, shipping, and receiving. Building #4 was built in 1981 to house the mercury reclamation furnace. This building is now used to temporarily store hazardous waste and house the wastewater treatment system. Although the facility did have a mercury reclamation process, it is believed that it did not receive any no n - process materials for recycling. There has been one RCRA inspection performed at this site in the past 3 years, completed in January 2005. Battery Tech has been in RCRA non

- compliance for 6 of the past 12 quarters. There was one formal RCRA enforcem ent in October 2004 and a formal RCRA action taken against it in July 2004. This site is subject to two CERCLA Unilateral Administrative Orders (UAOs) for RD/RA for each operable unit (soils/groundwater). Gillette has completed the soil remediation and the groundwater pump

- and

- treat system. Whether to convert the two UAO’s into Consent Decrees is under discussion. Contamination occurred at this site until 1986. This facility did not hold a RCRA Part B permit. Description of Contamination: Site operations, including recycling hazardous waste such as mercury reclamation, resulted in extensive mercury and manganese contamination in the soil and groundwater at the site. Contamination, however, likely occurred between the mid

- 1970s through the mid 1980's. One source of mercury contamination in the soil involved past operations in the area of Plant #2. Another source of mercury contamination in the soil resulted from spillage while transporting the mercuric oxide from Plant #2 to Plant #1. Leaching of th e mercury to the soil into the groundwater resulted in mercury groundwater contamination. Mercury is present in on

- site ground water at levels significantly higher than both state and federal drinking water standards.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling North Carolina

228 Sources of Information: B lack, Trevor C. (Associate Regional Counsel) (404) 562

- 9581, Interview. 21 November 2005 EPA Region 4. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 31 October 2005. USEPA. “Battery Tech (Duracell

- Lexington).” CERCLIS. 12 October 200 6. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0402542 USEPA. “Duracell GBMG.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.) 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000604187 USEPA. “Duracell GBMG.” Enforcement & Compliance History Online. 8 December 2005. 19 January 2006

. http://www.epa.gov/cgi

- bin/get1cReport.cgi?tool=echo&IDNumber=110000604187 USEPA. “Duracell.” RCRAInfo . 29 September 2005. 20 January 2006. USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Battery Tech (Duracell

- Lexington).” 29 September 2005. 19 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/superrods/index.cfm?fuseaction=data.si terods&siteid=0402542 Additional Contacts: Steve H. Barron (Contact/Regulatory/RCRA), (336) 242

- 6000 Trevor C. Black (Associate Regional Counsel), (404) 562

- 9581Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling North Carolina

229 Site Information Site Name: Nucor Corporation, Inc. EPA ID No.: Address: headquartered in Charlotte, NC County: NPL Site: In CERCLIS Database: Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Nucor Corporation, Inc. (Nucor) will spend nearly $100 million to settle an environmental suit, under an agreement reached December 19, 2000, with the Justice Department and USEPA. The suit alleged that Nucor failed to control the amount of pollution released from its steel factories in seven states. This is the largest and most comprehensive environmental settlement ever with a steel manufacturer. The settlement, filed in U.S. District Court in Florence, SC, requires Nucor to undertake broad environmental improvements at its 14 facilities in Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, Texas and Utah. The settlement terms are a s follows: Nucor will pay a civil penalty of $9 million; and $85 million will be spent on injunction relief. Nucor will pilot air pollution control technologies for control of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from its electric arc and reheat furnaces. This control technology should set a new standard for NOx control in the steel industry. Nucor will also conduct sampling of groundwater and soil at all facilities; conduct sampling of stormwater at all “mini

- mills,” which produce steel by melting scrap metal in large electric arc furnaces; identify areas of contamination and clean up that contamination in accordance with a USEPA

- or state

- approved plan for each facility; implement enhancements to its environmental management of electric arc furnace dust, proce ss waster, and storm water to ensure continued compliance with hazardous waste laws and Clean Water Act requirements; and lastly complete all filings under the Emergency Planning and Community Right

- to

- Know Act of 1986. Nucor will conduct extensive enviro nmental audits to discover and correct any remaining environmental problems, as well as put in place a corporate

- wide environmental management system to prevent future violations. $4 million will be spent on additional environmental projects, $2 million f

or community

- based supplemental environmental projects. Also, $2 million will be spent for the installation of state

- of

- the

- art continuous air emission monitoring (CEM) equipment at Nucor’s minimills that will monitor continuously to ensure that the company complies with emission limits for NOx and sulfur oxides. The installation of CEM equipment is not required by law, and will add significantly to USEPA’s understanding of emissions at Nucor facilities and throughout the steel industry. Under the second settlement term, Nucor will improve its methods for the K061 dust it generates by sampling groundwater and soil at each of its factories, identify those areas that are contaminated with K061 dust, and clean them up under a USEPA

- or state

- approved plan. O nly a small portion of the $100 million settlement pertains directly to recycling operations (the exact amount is unclear). The agreement covers eight Nucor mini

- mills and six steel fabrication plants, where the final molding and painting of steel product s occurs. The settlement resolves allegations, contained in a federal complaint filed along with the agreement, that Nucor violatedAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling North Carolina

230 environmental standards that regulate the release of pollutants into the air, water, and soil. In addition, the complaint al leges that Nucor mismanaged K061 dust, a hazardous waste produced by the steel furnaces. Description of Contamination: Nucor processed ferrous scrap metals, some of which contained hazardous contaminants. The recycling process created K061 dust that co ntained lead and cadmium. This dust was disposed of improperly at eight Nucor factories, resulting in contaminated soil and groundwater. The dust also was discharged illegally through wastewater and storm water. These actions violated several environmental laws, including RCRA. Sources of Information: USEPA. “Nucor Corporation, Inc. Multimedia Settlement.” 16 March 2005. 25 January 2005. http://www.epa.gov/compliance/ resources/cases/civil/mm/nucor.html USEPA. “Nucor Corporation, Inc. Civil Judicial Settlement Fact Sheet.” 19 December 2000. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/complian ce/resources/cases/civil/mm/nucorfs.pdf USEPA. “ U.S. Reaches Environmental Settlement with Steel Manufacturer Nucor.”19 December 2000. 19 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/016bcfb1deb9fecd85256aca005d74df/9eb593c 7e2c54803852569ba006165a8?OpenDocumentAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

231 Site Information Site Name: American Recycling Company EPA ID No.: OHD000720110 Address: 3203 W. 71 st St., Cleveland, OH 44102 County: Cuyahoga NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : American Recycling Company was a mercury lamp and metal reclamation site. It accepted fluorescent lamps, computers, and light ballasts for recycling. The fluorescent bulbs were crushed and the waste streams separated except for the mercury component, which was mostly stockpiled on

- site. Description of Contamination : The facility went out of business, leaving b ehind hundreds of drums of PCB wastes. The materials were abandoned in 2001. The owner of the property is being held responsible for the cleanup. There is no known soil or groundwater contamination at the site. Sources of Information: Hale, Karen (Ohi o EPA). Email correspondence to David Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 24 June 2005. USEPA. “American Recycling Company.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 22 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110004585299 Additional Contacts : Drew Koler, (216) 281

- 9200 Karen Hale (Ohio EPA), (614) 644

- 2927, karen.hale@epa.state.oh.us.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

232 Site Information Site Name: Century 21 Paints EPA ID No.: OHD051413078 Address: 166 South Meridian Road, Austintown, OH 44515 County: Mahoning NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0504361 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Century 21 Paints was a paint retailer, reformulator, and di stributor. It accepted unused paint wastes to recycle or rework. Description of Contamination : On August 9, 1998, a major fire occurred at the site. More than 100,000 paint containers and numerous pallets of asphalt shingles were damaged in the blaze. Paint was also found buried on site. On August 17, 1998, EPA Region 5 and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) began cleanup at the site. The soil at the site was contaminated. In July 2001, Century 21 Paint was required to pay $120,000 to the Hazardous Substance Superfund for recovery of past response costs at the site. Sources of Information : Federal Register (Volume 66, Number 140) Page 37963. “Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement; Budd Brothers, d/b/a Century 21 Paint, Inc.” 20 July 2001. 25 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA

- WASTE/2001/July/Day

- 20/f18192.htm Hale, Karen (Ohio EPA). Email correspondence to David Fagan (EPA Offi ce of Solid Waste). 24 June 2005. USEPA. “Century 21 Paint.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0504361 US EPA. “Century 21 Paint.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. 18 January 2006. 18 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110006427919 USEPA. “US EPA Region 5 1998 News Releases.” 1998. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5/news/1998news_release_archive.pdf Additional Contacts : Joseph Freddle (OSC), (440) 250

- 1740 Leo Rosales (EPA), (312) 353

- 6198 Jennifer Peterson (Ohio EPA), (614) 644

- 2160 Karen Hale (Ohio EPA), (614) 644

- 2927, karen.hale@epa.state.oh.us.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

233 Site Information Site Name: Columbus Steel Drum Company EPA ID No.: OHD004291654 Address: 1385 Blatt Boulevard, Blacklick, OH 43230 County: Franklin NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Columbus Steel Drum Company, Inc. began operations in 1955, and its name changed to the Franklin Steel Company in 1979. The facility was built in 1970. Evans Industries operated the facility from 1997 through the end of 2002, when Queen City Barrel Company leased the site. The facility is currently operated by Queen City Barrel, which i s doing business as Columbus Steel Drum. The 18

- acre facility reconditions used 55

- gallon drums for resale. Closed head drums were placed on a conveyor belt and transported to the process building. In the process building, the drums were cleaned with a ho t caustic solution, rinsed, shot blasted to remove the old paint, and then repainted. Open head drums were turned upside down before they entered the oxidizer to drain any liquids. The oxidizer (furnace) burned off any residual material remaining in the drum. The open head drums were then sent into the process building for caustic rinse, shot blasting, and repainting. The site does not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination: The soil, sediment, surface water, and groundwater showed elevated levels of many metals, as well as semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Franklin Steel processed approximately 4,000 to 6,000 closed

- head and open

- head drums per day. Prior to 1986, when drum inventory was at its pe ak, approximately 450,000 "RCRA empty" (less then one inch of liquid) drums were being stored at the site. At that time, approximately 38 acres, consisting of two separate 10

- acre drum storage areas and the main 18

- acre processing/drum storage area, were b eing used by Franklin Steel for drum storage and processing. Since 1988, only the main 18

- acre drum processing facility has been used for the drum reconditioning operations. Currently, approximately 50,000 empty drums are being stored on site. In February 1980, there was a spill of 15,000 to 20,000 gallons of hazardous waste sludge from Franklin Steel's caustic clarifier, which was caused by an overflow of the system. The released sludge entered the Blacklick Creek drainage system. Sediment and surface water samples taken in March 1980 revealed cadmium, chromium, lead, zinc, and phenol. Sampling of the stormwater holding pond by Ohio EPA in December 1985 indicated elevated levels of various VOCs, SVOCs, and elevated levels of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cyanide, and lead. Testing was completed in October 1998. The soil was contaminated with many metals including arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead, as well as SVOCs and VOCs. The groundwater had elevated levels of numerous metals including aluminum, arsenic, barium, chromium, and lead, SVOCs, and VOCs. Surface water and sediment were also contaminated.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

234 More recently, in June 2005, the Ohio EPA proposed a consent order to address environmental violations at Columbus Steel. These violations include creating a public nuisance through odorous air emissions; exceeding emission limits for several pollutants; failing to obtain several air permits and install required air pollution control measures, storing hazardous waste without a permit; failing to identi fy hazardous waste and shipping hazardous waste to a landfill not permitted to accept it; and polluting waters through storm water runoff from the facility. The proposed consent order, issued June 2, 2005, includes a total civil penalty of $500,000. In 1 993, under RCRA, Columbus Steel Drum was forced to pay $28,100. Sources of Information: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. “Division of Emergency and Remedial Response Site Cleanup Summary Columbus Steel Drum Co., Inc. July 2004. 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.state.oh.us/cdo/colssteeldrm.htm Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. “Ohio EPA Seeks Comments on Proposed Consent Order with Columbus Steel Drum.” 2 June 2005. 18 January 200 6. http://www.epa.state.oh.us/pic/nr/2005/june/columbussteeldrum.html USEPA. “Penalty Report for Fiscal year 1993 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.” 1993. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5/orc/annualreports/1993/pen_93_rcra.htm USEPA. “Columbus Steel Drum.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0506149 USEPA. “Ohio Petition Review Public Meeting.” 13 November 2001. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5/ohioreview/pdf/2001Nov13

- pubmtg

- PalermoRm

evening.pdf USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Columbus Steel Drum.” RCRAInfo. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=OHD004291654 Additional Contacts: Jim Leach, (614) 644

- 2160 Kevin Johnson, (614) 644

- 2160 David O’Toole (Ohio EPA), (614) 728

- 5040Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

235 Site Information Site Name: County Line Auto Parts (Imthurn Drum Site) EPA ID No.: RCRAInfo: OHR000022327, CERCLIS: OH0001887454 Address: 585 The Bend Rd., Ney, OH 43549 County: Defiance NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0507704 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : County Line Auto Parts, also known as Imthurn Drum Site, was a salvage yard recovering drums that was located at an abandoned school. The company also accepted spent solvents that were burned in the school boilers. Imthurn Drum Site, owned by Ellis Imthurn who is now deceased, never had a RCRA permit and never obtained permits of any kind to transport, store, or dispose hazardous waste. Beginning in 1977 and continuing until at least 1991, a Campbell Soup Company food production plant sold or provided Imthurn with 55

- gallon drums of waste material, some of which Imthurn used as fuel. Description of Contamination : Contamination at the site results from the 1,500 leaking drums of solvents, wa ste oil, and sludge that are stored on site. On January 23, 1997, Ohio EPA and USEPA conducted a preliminary assessment at the Imthurn facility. The agencies discovered approximately 1,500 deteriorating 55

- gallon drums of hazardous waste. In 1996 and 1997 , Campbell removed the drums and some of the contaminated soil under an enforcement order from USEPA. Ohio EPA determined that Campbell failed to evaluate the waste generated at the Napoleon facility; ensure that hazardous waste generated at the Napoleon facility was delivered to a permitted treatment, storage, or disposal facility; notify USEPA of hazardous waste fuel activities; and comply with Ohio law. The company also violated Ohio regulations by marketing hazardous waste fuel directly to a burner without obtaining permission. In 2001, Campbell Soup Company and Campbell Soup Supply Company agreed to pay a civil penalty of $67,000. They also agreed to reimburse Ohio EPA $37,571.50 for costs the Agency incurred for hazardous waste violations related to the Imthurn drum site. In addition to paying the civil penalty, Campbell must secure the site to ensure that no further dumping takes place; evaluate ground water to ensure no contamination has occurred; and submit and implement an acceptable hazardous waste closure plan. In order to return the property to residential use, a portion of the civil penalty payment will be used by the Campbell companies to clean up solid waste at the Imthurn facility. Campbell may apply up to $22,000 of the civil penalty to remove and properly dispose of all solid waste on site. The remaining $45,000 will go to Ohio EPA's hazardous waste cleanup fund. Sources of Information: Hale, Karen (Ohio EPA). Email correspondence to David Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 24 June 2005.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

236 Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. “Ohio EPA reaches $104,571.50 Settlement With Campbell Soup Company and Campbell Soup Supply Company for Hazardous Waste Violations.” 23 October 2001. 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.state.oh.us/pic/nr/2001/oct/campbell.html USEPA. “County Line Auto Parts.” RCRA Info. 10 October 2003. 18 January 2006. USEPA. “Imthurn Drum Site.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0507704 USEPA. “County Line Auto Parts.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 22 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000816190 Additional Contacts : Partap Lall (OSC), (734) 692

- 7685 Michael Maringer (Contact/Regulatory), (419) 592

- 1010 Karen Hale (Ohio EPA),(614) 644

- 2927, karen.hale@epa.state.oh.us.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

237 Site Information Site Name: Environmental Processing Services EPA ID No.: OHD000608588 Address: 416 Leo St, Dayton, OH 45404 County: Montgomery NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Environmental Processing Services was a solvent recycler and fuel blender. The facility is out of business. The site never had a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination: Groundwater is contaminated with VOCs. Environmental damage occurred from the 1980s into the early 90s by storage prior to recycling. Waste was stored in an onsite parking lot (unpermitted unit) because waste was determined upon receipt to be not amenable for recycle. Seven hundred drums of waste were stored for an extended period of time in the parking lot while an alternative management method was determined. Leakage occurred during the time the drums were stored in the lot. Sources of Information: Hale, Karen (Ohio EPA). Email correspondence to David Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 24 June 2005. USEPA. “Environmental Processing Services.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 22 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000616735 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Environmental Processing Services.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=OHD000608588 Additional Contacts : Karen Hale (Ohio EPA), (614) 644

- 2927, karen.hale@epa.state.oh.us. William Cernatic (Contact/Regulatory), (513) 222

- 1062Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

238 Site Information Site Name: Master Metals Inc. EPA ID No.: ODH097613871 Address: 2850 West 3 rd St., Cleveland, OH 44113 County: Cuyahoga NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0504506 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Master Metals was a secondary and refining smelting facility of nonferrous metals that accepted lead dross, lead acid batteries, scrap and baghouse dust. NL Lead Industries Inc. operated the facility from 1933 until 1979. Master Metals Inc. bought the facility and continued operations until 1993 when Ohio EPA shut the facility down after a long history of air quality and other violations. The site did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : Contamination is due to storing wastes in piles on the ground. Lead contamination was found in site soil as well as in a residential neighborhood where the residences had contracted with Master Metals for fill dirt. This contamination occurred in the early 1990s. As of September 2004, cleanup expenditures at this site amounted to $309,300.98. Sources of Information : USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 20 January 2006. USEPA. “Final Cleanup Begins at Master Metals Site.” EPA Region 5. 24 March 2003. 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region5/news/news03/03opa043.htm USEPA. “Master Metals Incorporation.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0504506 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Master Metals Inc.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=OHD097613871 Additional Contacts : Bri Bill (CIC), (312) 353

- 6646 Robert Buckley (OSC), (734) 692

- 7662 Rosanne Ellison (OSC), (734) 692

- 7689 Gwenn Massenburg (RPM), (312) 886

- 0983Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

239 Site Information Site Name: Midw est Guardian EPA ID No.: ODH048782049 Address: 100 Keller Drive, Wapakoneta, OH 45895 County: Auglaize NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Midwest Guardian was a lead acid battery reclamation facility that released lead

- laden battery acid from the storage of lead acid batteries in tractor trailers and from chipped battery casings stored in containers. Chipped battery casings also littered the parking lot. The site did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : Contamination of the site occurred in the mid

- 1990s. The Ohio EPA has recently approved a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for Midwest Guardian, but they have not started the work so the extent of contamination is pres ently unknown. In 2001, the owner settled with the state and agreed to pay a $30,557 penalty for violating Ohio hazardous waste laws. In December 2005, the site was reassessed by USEPA under the CERCLA program and given a No Further Action determination

. Sources of Information : Hale, Karen (Ohio EPA). Email correspondence to David Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 24 June 2005. Ohio EPA. “Midwest Guardian Agrees to $30,557 Penalty for Violating Ohio's Hazardous Waste Laws.” 31 August 2000. 20 Oc tober 2006. http://www.epa.state.oh.us/pic/nr/2000/august/mwguard.html USEPA. “Midwest Guardian Inc.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/cactinfo.cfm?id=0506948 USEPA. “Midwest Guardian Inc.” RCRA Info. 15 September 2000. 18 January 2006. Additional Contacts : Donald E. Miller Jr., (419) 738

- 8185 Karen Hale (Ohio EPA), (614) 644

- 2927, karen.hale@epa.state.oh.us.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

240 Site Information Site Name: ONARP Inc.(Mel’s Battery) EPA ID No.: ODH980995963 Address: 459 N. Main St., Lima, OH 45801 County: Allen NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site His tory and Description of Recycling Operation : Mel’s Battery was a lead acid battery recycling facility that is no longer in operation. Lead

- laden battery acid, as well as spent acid resulting from drum washing, has contaminated the site. The company was ordered to complete closure per director’s Findings and Orders but never did. USEPA issued the company a §3008(h) order to clean up site and again, the company did nothing. Although the dates of operation are unknown, the first enforcement was 1987. The site did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : The soils and flooring in site buildings are contaminated with high levels of lead. Sources of Information : Hale, Karen (Ohio EPA). Email correspondence to David Fagan (EPA Office of So lid Waste). 24 June 2005. USEPA. “Injunctive Relief 1993.” EPA Region 5. 1993. 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg5oorc/annualreports/1993/ir93.htm USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Ac tion Site Progress Profile for Onarp Inc.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=OHD980995963

Additional Contacts: Karen Hale (Ohio EPA), (614) 644

- 2927, karen.hale@epa.state.oh.us.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

241 Site Information Site Name: Queen City Barrel Co. EPA ID No.: OHD004477634 Address: 1937 South Street, Cincinnati, OH 45204 County: Hamilton NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 505978 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The Queen City Barrel Emergency Response site consists of a 400,000

- square - foot warehouse commonly referred to as the "Lawson Building." E. Paul Corporation owns the Lawson Buil ding. Queen City Barrel Company (QCB) owns a container reconditioning facility that adjoins the Lawson Building to the north and west. Since at least 1998, QCB has leased the Lawson Building and used it for drum and container storage, fiber drum reconditioning, and equipment and maintenance storage. Since at least 1998, a portion of the Lawson Building has also been leased to a wooden pallet reconditioner, C&H Pallet Company. In March 1984, the site was issued a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : On August 19, 2004, at approximately 6:30 p.m., a fire ignited in the Lawson Building. At the time of the fire, the warehouse contained thousands of fiber, plastic, and metal drums and other containers. The following chemicals were detected in the Whateley Street smoke plume: acetone, 2

- butanone (methyl ethyl ketone), tetrahydrofuran, heptane, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, styrene, and xylene. Drums were noted to be burned, partially burned, and in varying stages of deterioration due to the fire, which was still smoldering. Drums were observed within the fire area, as well as in other parts of the building that were immediately adjacent to the fire areas. Drums were stacked three high in several areas of the building's upper level. As of March 2 5, 2005, approximately 28,436 empty drums have been removed from the drum storage building. A total of 12,971 drums containing liquid and solid wastes were staged, sampled, and hazard categorized for off

- site disposal. In addition, in February 2004, Ohio EPA reached a settlement with Queen City Barrel Co. for violating air pollution control regulations at its drum reconditioning facility. The company agreed to pay a $26,625 civil penalty and shut down a coating line that will result in the reduction of 1.6 tons per year of volatile organic compounds to the air. Between October 30, 2000, and August 13, 2002, HCDES inspectors documented that Queen City Barrel failed to conduct air emissions tests on time or file adequate paperwork to document the effectiv eness of the company's pollution control devices. On October 25, 2002, the company submitted paperwork documenting times that complete air pollution control equipment records were not kept. On October 22, 2003, HCDES investigated an odor complaint in the Lower Price Hill area. The inspection determined that Queen City Barrel was operating an unpermitted steel drum coating line. In addition to paying the fine, Queen City Barrel agreed to stop operating the exterior drum coating line that was the source of the October 2003 odor complaint and conduct tests of the emissions control devices in the presence of HCDES staff. The company has since tested its air emissions and is in compliance with all applicable air laws and regulations.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

242 Sources of Information : Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. “Cincinnati Company Agrees to Pay $26,625 for Air Pollution Violations; Will Stop One Painting Operation.” 20 February 2004. 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.state.oh.us/pic/nr/2004/february/qcb.html USEPA. “Queen City Barrel.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo .cfm?id=0505978 USEPA. “Queen City Barrel.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.) 22 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/queencitybarrel USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Queen C ity Barrel.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=OHD004477634 USEPA. “Reports of Significant Developments and Activities Ending on September 10, 2004.” EPA Region 5. 17 September 2004. 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5superfund/significant_actions/20 04/040910.txt Additional Contacts : Steven Renninger (OSC) (513) 569

- 7539 renninger.steven@epa.gov An additional list of contacts can be found at the following link: http://www.epaosc.net/contact_list.asp?site_id=R5ZZAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

243 Site Information Site Name: River Recycling Industries, Inc. EPA ID No.: OHD004187035 Address: 4195 Bradley Road, Cleveland, OH 44109 County: Cuyahoga NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The facility was originally developed in the later half of the 1800s as a copper refinery and then converted to a brickworks. River Recycling Industries (RRI) purchas ed the facility in 1919 and currently acts as an intermediate dealer of copper alloys. Scrap metals from the plumbing, marine, bearings, electric, automotive, and locomotive industries, as well as from scrap dealers, provide the raw materials for the operation. The materials are combined, melted, and formed into ingots, which are shipped to customers as final products. The slag from the smelting operations is sold to other smelters for further refining. RRI also manufactures resin

- coated sand used to make i ndustrial cores and molds for the metal castings industries. The site did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination: In 2000, it was found that groundwater was contaminated with aluminum, arsenic, lead and mercury and soil was contaminated wi th arsenic, lead, and zinc. Sources of Information: Ohio EPA. “Ohio GPRA Corrective Action Universe Environmental Indicators Status.” 1 March 2005. 19 January 2005. http://www.epa.gov/reg5rcra/wptdiv/cars/caindicators/ohca_tables.pdf USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for River Recycling Industries Inc.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=OHD004187035 USEPA. “River Recycling Industries Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000616913 USEPA. “Statement of Basis for the Selection of Corrective Measures for the River Recycling Industries Facility Cleveland, Ohio 004 187 035.” http://www.epa.gov/reg5rcra/wptdiv/permits/mr_RiverRecyclingSOB.pdf Additional Contacts: Todd Gmitro (Corrective Action Project Manager), (312) 886

- 5909, gmitro.todd@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

24 4 Site Information: Site Name: Safety

- Kleen (Hebron) EPA ID No.: OHD980587364 Address: 581 Milliken Drive SE, Hebron, OH 43025 County: Licking NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Op eration : Safety

- Kleen has been in operation since July 1981 as a large solvent reclamation facility recycling mineral spirits, dry cleaning solvents, paint and lacquer solvents, and other organic solvents. The spent solvents are stored in tanks and contai ners prior to the recycling process and then reclaimed using distillation and fractionating process equipment. Dry cleaning process wastes, spent industrial solvents, and mineral spirits dumpster mud are brought to the facility and the solvents are recovered for reuse through the Safety

- Therm process. The solid residues generated during the recycling process are transported off site for proper disposal. The facility has a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination: The site has extensive soil, surface water, and ground water contamination. Due to a mechanical malfunction of a heat band, a fire occurred in the aboveground storage tank farm in November 1985. The tank farm was destroyed and a release of unknown quantities of spent and reclaimed solvent to soil, surface water and ground water occurred. In September 2002, USEPA Region 5 reached agreement with Safety

- Kleen Systems Inc. for violations of federal hazardous waste rules at its Hebron, Ohio, facility. The company admitted the violations and agreed to pay a $945,018 penalty on approval by the bankruptcy court. The violations, which occurred between Sept. 1, 1996, and Feb. 28, 2000, were failure to properly operate air emissions equipment on recycling machinery and failure to monitor pumps for air emissions regulated under RCRA. Sources of Information: Hale, Karen (Ohio EPA). Email correspondence to David Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 24 June 2005. Ohio EPA. “Ohio EPA to Hold Hearing on a Draft Permit for Safety

- Kleen Corporation.” 5 May 1998. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.state.oh.us/pic/nr/1998/may/safeklee.html USEPA. “Safety Kleen Systems Inc.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. 18 January 2006. 18 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000381471 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Safety Kleen Systems Inc.” RCRA Inf o. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=OHD980587364Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

245 USEPA. “EPA Settles with Safety

- Kleen on Hazardous Waste Violations; Includes $945,018 Fine.” 25 September 2002. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5/news/news02/02opa129.htm USEPA. “Statement of Basis/Final Decision and Response to Comments Summary

– Safety

Kleen Corporation Recycle Center Facility.” 14 July 1998. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/ca/sbs2/pdfs/oh7364.pdf Additional Contacts: Andy Lonzo (Safety Kleen), (740) 929

- 3532 Jim Leach, (614) 728

- 0041 Kim Reinbold (Ohio EPA Hazardous Waste Management), (614) 728

- 3887 Karen Hale (Ohio EPA), (614) 644

- 2927, karen.hale@epa.state.oh.us Sirtaj Ahmed (EPA Project Coordinator), (312) 886

- 4445, ahmed.sirtaj@epamail.epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

246 Site Information : Site Name: Sentco Paints EPA ID No.: OHD981094212 Address: 1301 N Meridian Road, Youngstown, OH 44511 County: Mahoning NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Sentco Paints was a manufacturer and wholesale distributor of paint and asphalt products. The facility accepted unused paint to recycle or rework into their products. Description of Contamination : There is soil contamination as a result of activities that took place in the 1980s. Paint was found stored in leaking drums, buried under a loading dock, and open burned, and drums of paint started showing up in dumpsters around town. Roland Brothers, President of Sentco, Rick Brothers, Plant Manager, and Donald Cole, a company employee, pled guilty in June 1992 to illegal disposal of hazardous waste for burying 56 drums of paint waste under a cement loading dock at the site. The guilty pleas resulted in sentences of 15 months incarceration for Roland Brothers, 18 months incarceration for Rick Brothers, and 6 months home detention for Donald Cole. On March 17, 1994, Sentco Paint Manufacturing Company, Inc. was sentenced to 3 years probation and an $8,000 fine for its part in violating RCRA through the illegal disposal of hazardous wastes. Sources of Information : Hale, Karen (Ohio EPA). Email correspondence to David Fagan (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 24 June 2005. USEPA. “FY 1994 Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report.” p. A

- 84. (n.d.) 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Compliance/resources/reports/planning/results/fy94accomplishment. pdf Additional Contacts: David Taliaferro (Region 5)Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

247 Site Information Site Name: Smith Chemical EPA ID No.: OHN000509086 Address: 1221 3rd Street N.E., Canton, OH C ounty: Stark NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0509086 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The site includes a four

- story brick building with a basement, a parking lot, and the surrounding property. The Smith Chemical Corporation was founded by George and John Smith and began operations in January 1976. The company performed chemical manufacturing; custom chemical blending, packaging and brokerage; and chemical distribution to customers in Ohio and the five contiguous states. The comp any's markets included chemical manufacturers, steel manufacturers, oil and gas producers, oil refiners, drillers and service companies, metal plating, and publicly owned treatment works (POTWs). The company received molten sulfur in bulk tank trucks and converted it into various solid forms, as required by its customers in the steel industry. In addition, the company performed chlorination of spent hydrochloric acid pickle liquor (SPL) and subsequently sold the resulting product (ferric chloride) as a treatment chemical for phosphate removal from wastewater at POTWs. The company also offered leased space in its Canton warehouse to other businesses. On May 18, 1993, Smith Chemical Corporation filed a petition pursuant to Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Service Chem of Ohio (SCO) began operating at the site in 1994 and reportedly ceased operations in November 2001. SCO was owned and operated by the same individuals who owned and operated Smith Chemical Corporation. The current site owner purchased the property for $5 on December 18, 2002, at the County Auditor's Auction (Forfeited Land Sale). Reportedly the current owner planned to donate the property to a local charity for demolition and redevelopment into affordable, single

- family dwellings. Description of Con tamination: In September 2003, nearly 800 drums and smaller containers were observed at the site. Corrosive and flammable materials were present on the site as well as large pools of spilled liquid in the basement and first floor. In addition, containers in the on

- site laboratory that contain hazardous substances were small enough to be easily manipulated or transported off site. Based on laboratory analyses, container labels, and the facility historical chemical inventory records, hazardous substances existed on site and were contained in 55

- gallon drums and smaller containers in varying conditions. Sources of Information: USEPA. “Enforcement Action Summary Fiscal Year 2004 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). ” (n.d.) 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5/orc/enfactions/enfactions2004/law

- cercla.htm#freeman USEPA. “Memorandum: Reports on Significant Developments and Activities Ending on May 7, 2004.” 7 May 2004. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5/superfund/significant_actions/2004/040507.txtAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Ohio

248 USEPA. “Smith Chemical.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 18 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0509086 USEPA. “Smith Chemical Freeman Environmental PRP.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d). 18 January 2006. http://www.epaosc.net/site_profile.asp?site_id=B58F(V

- W

- 04

- C779 Additional Contacts: Reginald Pallesen (EPA), 312

- 886

- 0555 James Augustyn (OSC), (440) 250

- 1742, augustyn.james@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oklahoma

249 Site Information Site Name: Chief Supply/Greenway Environmental EPA ID No.: CERCLIS: OK0000605385, RCRAInfo: OKD089761290 Address: Rt. 2 Box 71, Haskell, OK 74436 County: Wagoner NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0605385 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The 18

- acre site is an inactive RCRA treatment, storage, and recycling facility that op erated from 1977 to 2000. A RCRA Permit was issued in February 1994 after the first permit, which was issued in October 1984, expired in October 1989. The site originally operated under the name of Chief Chemical and Supply Company until 1997 when it clos ed following an explosion at the facility caused by mixing incompatible chemicals. The site also declared bankruptcy at that time. The site re

- opened under the name of Greenway Environmental in 1998 and continued operations until the facility was abandon ed sometime in 2000 when it could not obtain RCRA permits. The facility currently has several vacant office trailers, a shop building, a large main processing building, two above ground storage tanks (reactors), 2 sheet metal buildings, 14 empty tanks, 4 18

- wheeler trailers, 3 Roll

- Off boxes containing various wastes, and several drums, tanks and other debris in an open field referred to as the "bone yard." Operations at the facility primarily included the treatment, storage, and recycling of hazardous and non - hazardous wastes. Early operations at the site consisted of solvent and oil recycling, hazardous waste storage, paint stripping, and drum cleaning. Hazardous materials processed at the facility include petroleum

- based solvents as well as spent halog enated solvents, contaminated soil and debris. Prior to 1998, Chief Supply reported receiving minor amounts of zinc phosphate, phosphoric acid, mercury, selenium, and asbestos. Most of the wastes were stored in containers, roll

- off boxes, and tank trucks . When Greenway Environmental took over operations at the site, they took hazardous liquids, including paint wastes and solvents, and blended them into fuel, which was transported out of state for use in cement kilns and other industrial uses. Descripti on of Contamination: The 1997 fire, which killed an employee and heavily damaged the facility, was the result of improper storage and mixture of wastes. Following the fire, environmental samples detected chlorinated solvents, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene contamination. In December 2003, the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality reached a settlement with Frontier Insurance Company in Rehabilitation, Greenway’s financial assurance provider, for a one

- time $175,000 settlement. The mone y was used for waste removal at the site. After the site was abandoned, there were numerous reports of break

- ins at the site and as much as 33,000 gallons of hazardous waste remain onsite with many deteriorating containers holding unknown contents. Some of the waste streams identified on the site in 2004 included organic liquids, chlorinated liquids and sludge, trash, paint solids with mercury, and household and pesticide aerosols. Sources of Information: Hailes, Cindy, (405) 702

- 5218, Interview. 7 De cember 2005.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oklahoma

250 Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality. “The 2003 Land Report.” 10 January 2004. 18 January 2006. http://www.deq.state.ok.us/pubs/lpd/03lndrprt.pdf Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality. “The 2004 Land Report.” 11 January 2005. 18 January 2006. http://www.deq.state.ok.us/mainlinks/reports/landreport04.pdf Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality. “DEQ and EPA plan Greenway cleanup.” 19 March 2004. 18 January 2006. http://www.deq.state.ok.us/mainlinks/media/04news/march/Greenway.pdf USEPA. “Chi ef Supply/Greenway.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 18 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0605385 USEPA. “Chief Supply/Greenway.” On

- Scene Co ordinator Profile. 21 June 2004. 18 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/greenway USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Greenway Environmental.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=OKD089761290 USEPA. “Greenway Environmen/Haskell Pit.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 18 January 200 6. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110014424140 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action News A Record of Successes.” Spring 2000. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/ca/resource/newsltr/canews/news0600.pdf Additional Contacts: Philip Ofosu (SAM), (214) 665

- 3178 Susan Webster (OSC), (214) 665

- 6784 Rita Engblom (OSC), engblom.rita@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oklahoma

251 Site Information Site Name: Parawax Reclaiming, Inc. EPA ID No.: OKD062270590 Address: 700 South Irving, Oklahoma City, OK 73160 County: Oklahoma NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0601121 Site History and Description of Recycling Operatio n: Parawax operated as a reclaimer of oilfield wastes from 1942 until 1993. Parawax produced various oil and wax products from crude oil exploration and production wastes accepted from local producers. Historically, the crude oil exploration/production w astes were dehydrated using heat from an onsite boiler. Water produced during dehydration was aerated by treatment lagoons. Historical documents indicate up to five lagoons were used in the aeration treatment. Currently only one lagoon remains. Saltwater recovered in the process was disposed of at the Baker

- Townsend injection well approximately 1⁄4

- mile north

- northeast of the site. The current operation was halted by State mandate for environmental violations with orders to cleanup the facility. Insufficient resources were cited as the reason the owner/operator did not observe this State direction. However, solids and wastes had not been removed from the process for an extended time, and had accumulated to such an extent that little capacity for further accumu lation existed on site. Description of Contamination: Contaminants include petroleum and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Soil on site was contaminated with PCBs. USEPA discovered 26 above ground storage tanks in poor condition. These tanks contained nearly 500,000 gallons of oil, oily water, and sludge. Secondary containment berms (where they are present) were filled to near capacity with leaked oily waste. In addition to removing these wastes, USEPA had to remove 25,000 cubic yards of contaminated soils as well. Historical inspections conducted by the Oklahoma Water Resource Board (OWRB) indicate oil spilled from the Parawax site reached the North Canadian River. Offsite migration of oil was observed from piping on the southeastern fence boundary to the railroad right of way, and draining towards the river. USEPA, in cooperation with the US Coast Guard’s National Pollution Funds Center spent approximately $2.5 million in federal resources to clean up the site (as of 2001). Cleanup was completed b y Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), USEPA, the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the City of Oklahoma City, the US Coast Guard, the Native American Cultural and Educational Authority, the Oklahoma Department of Commerce and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Sources of Information: Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality. “Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Annual Report.” 2001. 18 January 2006. http://www.deq.state.ok.us/mainlinks/AR2001/2001AR

- 6.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oklahoma

252 US Coast Guard Department of Homeland Security. “Year in Review FY2001

- FY2002.” National Pollution Funds Center. 2001

- 2002. 18 January 2006. http://www.uscg.mil/hq/npfc/Documents/PDFs/year_in_review_01_02.pdf USEPA. “Parawax Refinery.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 20 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0601121 USEPA. “Pollution Reports (Polreps).” 13 April 2001. 18 January 2006. http://yosemite1.epa.gov/r6/polreps.nsf/0/4fcdffbf71f264ba86256bd500759c28?OpenDo cument USEPA. “Pollution Reports (Polreps).” 9 March 2001. 18 January 2006. http://yosemite1.epa.gov/r6/polreps.nsf/0/cb609b4a768195ed86256bd50074d2b5?OpenD ocument USEPA Region 6. “State, Federal, Local and Tribal Agencies Partners in Cleanup Project.” 15 November 2001. 18 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/b0789fb70f8ff03285257029006e3880/bb09f4f c701020ac852570d6005e7dc1!OpenDocument Additional Contacts: Jame s Mullins (OSC), (214) 665

- 2273 Philip Ofosu (SAM), (214) 665

- 3178 Susan Webster (OSC), (214) 665

- 6784 Rita R. Kottke (Oklahoma DEQ), (405) 702

- 5127Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

253 Site Information: Site Name: Baron Blakeslee EPA ID No.: ORD061483384 Address: 5920 NE 87th Ave. , Portland, OR 97220 County: Multnomah NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and/or Description of Recycling Operation: Prior to 1972, the site was owned by Ethyl Corporation and operated as a chlorinated solvent distribution center. From 1972 to 1993, Baron Blakeslee operated as a permitted hazardous waste storage and solvent recycling business. The facility recovered fluorinated and chlorinated solvents from waste liquids. In July 1991, the site was issued a RCRA permit. When the facility ceased operations in 1993, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality’s RCRA program managed the facility closure plan. Description of Contamination: On

- site soil and on

- site and off

- site groundwater contain significant concentrations of volati le organic compounds (VOCs) and chlorinated solvents. Groundwater is the primary pathway of concern. The solvent constituents detected were acetone, methylene chloride, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), 1,1,1

- trichloroethane, and trichloroethylene. The specific manner and times of release are not known; the source of contamination in general is historical operating practices. Sources of Information: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. “Environmental Cleanup Site Information (ECSI) Database Site Summary Report

– Details for Site ID 1274.” (n.d.) 21 October 2006. http://www.deq.state.or.us/wmc/ECSI/ecsidetail.asp?seqnbr=1274 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. “Facil ity Summary Report.” 11 March 2004. 18 January 2006. http://deq12.deq.state.or.us/FP20/Fpdetail.aspx?SiteID=8918 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Baron B lakeslee.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 20 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=ORD061483384 USEPA. “Documentation of Environmental Indicator Determination RCRA Corrective Action.” April 2005. 18 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/cleanup.nsf/0/35ab1c3dc0f9ce 1788256e01006ae0e7/$FILE/ OR3384_042005.pdf USEPA Region 9: Corrective Action. “Facility Environmental Indicators.” 3 October 2000. 18 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9coract.nsf/0/3A3DFC41FE9920C988256AC500795F3D?Op enDocumentAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

254 Additional Contacts : Bill Robertson, (503) 229

- 6843 robertson.bill@deq.state.or.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

255 Site Information: Site Name: Bergsoe Metal Corporation EPA ID No.: ORD991281460 Address: 444 Port Ave, St. Helens, OR 97051 County: Columbia NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and/or Description of Recycling Operation: The Bergsoe Metal facility, a secondary lead smelting facility, was constructed from 1980

- 1982. Operations started in April 1982 and ceased in October 1986 when BMC was placed in involuntary bankruptcy. During plant operations the site had six main buildings, each dedicated to a specific function of the plant. Also on s ite was a surge pond, the former slag and matte pile area, and employee parking areas. The main process of the BMC plant was smelting and refining scrap lead to produce lead ingots in the form of 60

- to 65

- pound pigs, 1,850

- pound hogs, and other customize d molds. Batteries, battery plates, solder flux waste, and lead scrap were delivered to the plant and smelted to produce elemental lead, which was further refined and alloyed. Used lead/acid batteries brought in by semitrailers were processed through the battery dumper (before August 1984) or battery wrecker (after August 1984). The resulting lead materials were staged in the silo building, then mixed with other raw materials to create a furnace charge. Battery casing chips were washed and sold for rec ycling. The battery acid was collected and sold as reusable material. Crude lead from the furnace was refined in the refinery kettles. Refined lead was then sent to casting machines and formed into ingots, which were sold to a variety of companies, mainly battery manufacturers. Lead alloys were also produced to customer specifications. In addition to scrap lead, a variety of chemicals and metals were used in the smelting and refining processes including coke, millscale, iron oxide, shredded iron, lead dro ss, aluminum, antimony, arsenic, cadmium, selenium, sodium metal, tin, caustic soda, iron pyrite, soda ash, sodium nitrite, sulphur and ammonium chloride. Bergsoe generated liquid and solid wastes throughout its operations. The facility's methods of storage, treatment and disposal were consistent for the duration of plant operation. Liquids included waste acid and acidic wash water. For the first few months of operation, waste acids were disposed of at the hazardous waste landfill in Arlington, Oregon. Af ter that they were sent to Boise Cascade's St. Helens plant as usable material. Wash water generated inside the buildings was recycled for reuse in a closed loop system. Heavily contaminated rinse water was sprayed into one of the afterburners. Storm water was collected through a system of storm drains, and piped to the on

- site surge pond. Process water was not discharged to the pond. Solids in the form of slag and matte were produced from the blast furnace, and were stored on the slag pad north of the furnace building and east of the silo building. Excess material was periodically moved from the slag pad to the slag and matte pile in the northwest corner of the site. Other solids including the baghouse dust were reused as components of the blast furnace charge. Plastics from the battery wrecker were rinsed and recycled. Used refractory brick wasAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

256 drummed and stored outside the electrical substation prior to disposal. Wooden pallets on which batteries had been delivered were stored along the north acces s road. Drums with lead scrap were sporadically stored along the east fence north of the gate. This site was not a RCRA

- permitted facility. Description of Contamination: Environmental damage occurred throughout the life of the facility. Soil was co ntaminated with lead, arsenic, and cadmium. Groundwater was contaminated with sulfate, lead and cadmium. During its operations from 1982

- 1986, air on

- site was contaminated with lead. Two releases of rinse water to the ground are on record. The first was 9 00 gallons in December 1982, the second 25,000 gallons in January 1985. In April 1985, 25,000 gallons of acid wash water were spilled. Acid leaked from the battery acid containment system during temporary storage. The liquid was characterized as corrosi ve and EP toxic for lead. Slag and matte piles located at the facility were characterized as EP toxic for lead and cadmium. Fugitive emissions and operating practices caused accumulation of lead, and to a lesser extent cadmium and arsenic, in soils at the facility site. None of the off

- site soil samples exceeded 500 mg/kg total lead. Dust on roads was heavily contaminated with lead. The on

- site pond contained surface water run

- off from the site which was contaminated with lead. Floor tanks became plug ged and ineffective, corroding out. During one early DEQ inspection of the site, as much as a foot of pooled acid solution was discovered. According to Bob Williams at Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, in the early to mid

90s, $16 million wa s spent on various interim removal actions and the final remedy was estimated to cost $431,000. According to USEPA cost figures, actual expenditures as of September 2004 was $26,056.45. On February 29, 1988 Bergsoe Metal Corporation entered into an administrative consent order with USEPA under CERCLA. Sources: Levin, Anne (Oregon DEQ), (503) 229

- 6258, Interview. 19 December 2005. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. “Environmental Cleanup Site Information (ECSI) Databases Site Summary Report

– Details for Site ID 12.” (n.d.) 20 January 2006. http://www.deq.state.or.us/wmc/ECSI/ecsidetail.asp?seqnbr=12 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. “Record of Decision Selected Final Remedial Action Bergsoe Metal Corporation St. Helens Oregon.” October 1994. 20 January 2006. USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Bergsoe Metal Corporation.” RCRAInfo. 6 June 2006. 21 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=ORD991281460 USEPA. “Bergsoe Metal Corporation.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 21 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/cactinfo.cfm?id=1000003Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

257 Williams, Robert (Oregon DEQ) williams.robert@deq.state.or.us , Email 19 De cember 2005. USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 20 January 2006. Contacts: Robert Williams (Oregon DEQ), (503) 229

- 6802, williams.robert@deq.state.or.us Anne Levine (Oregon DEQ), (503) 229

- 6258 Brett McKnight (Oregon DEQ), (541) 388

- 6146 x236Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

258 Site Information Site Name: Dennis Residence EPA ID No.: ORQ000020297 Address: 25727 Wildwood Rd. Veneta, OR 97487 County: Lane NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: A complaint was received in March 2001, alleging that one of the occupants of the residence was trying to extract gold from computer circuit boards with strong acids. Description of Contamination: During a State Police investigation, 13 55

- gallon drums of chemicals were discovered on site, many of which had corroded and were releasing hazardous constituents into the environment. In addition, vats of acid and arsenic had been dumped on the ground. Over 6,000 pounds of hazardous waste were removed from the site by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. There was evidence of toxic air releases as well as potential drinking water well contamination as a result of this operation. Sources of Information: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. “Environmental Cleanup Site Information (ECSI) Database Site Summary Report

– Details for Site ID 3069.” (n.d.). 20 January 2006. http://www.deq.state.or.us/wmc/ECSI/ecsidetail.asp?seqnbr=3069 Oregon Electronic Product Advisory Committee. “Report to the 2005 Oregon Legislature.” January 2005. 20 January 2006. http:/ /www.econ.state.or.us/ElecProdRpt05.pdf Additional Contacts: Geoffrey Brown (Oregon DEQ), (541) 686

- 7819Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

259 Site Information: Site Name: Environmental Pacific Corporation EPA ID No.: ORD980977334 Address: 111 W 4th St. #B, Amity, OR 97101 County: Yamhill NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and/or Description of Recycling Operation: Environmental Pacific Corporation was a battery recycler. In December 1990, the facility was cited for hazardous waste spills. EPC agreed to immediately cease receipt of all hazardous waste, remove all waste, decontaminate all hazardous waste storage tanks, and ship batteries stored at a Port of Portland terminal to a federally approved hazardous waste s torage facility. The facility ceased operations and filed for bankruptcy in January 1993. In January 1994, a consent degree was lodged against Environmental Pacific Corporation requiring the site to reimburse USEPA $113,055 for response costs under CERCLA and $60,163 under RCRA Corrective Action. In October 1997, a consent decree ordered the site to reimburse USEPA $83,953.68 for past costs incurred by USEPA at the site. The site was never issued a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination: Soil was c ontaminated with cadmium, mercury and sulfuric acid. Several spills occurred at the site. On October 14, 1986, 270 pounds of sulfuric acid (battery electrolyte) were spilled. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) inspected the facility in December 1990 and issued a Notice of Violation (NOV). The Oregon DEQ and Environmental Pacific Corporation agreed on a $32,000 enforcement action settlement. EPC agreed to immediately cease receipt of all hazardous waste, remove all waste, decontaminate all hazardous waste storage tanks, and ship batteries stored at a Port of Portland terminal to a federally

- approved hazardous waste storage facility. Sources of Information: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, “Environmental Cleanup Site Information (ECSI) Database Site Summary Report

– Details for Site ID 38.” (n.d.) 20 January 2006. http://www.deq.state.or.us/wmc/ECSI/ecsidetail.asp?seqnbr=38 USEPA. “Environmental Pacific Corp.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 21 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/arcsites/csitinfo.cfm?id=1001703 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Environmental Pacific Corp Sup.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 21 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=ORD980977334 USEPA . “Monthly Hotline Report.” January 1994. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hotline/94report/01_94.txtAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

260 USEPA. “Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehe nsive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act.” 15 October 1997. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA

- GENERAL/1997/October/Day

- 15/g27210.htm Additional Contacts: Gil Wistar (Oregon DEQ), (503) 229

- 5512, wistar.gil@deq.state.or.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

261 Site Information: Site Name: Grant Warehouse EPA ID No.: ORQ000010405 Address: 3368 NE Martin Luther Kin g Jr. Blvd, Portland OR 97212 County: Multnomah NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Grant Warehouse is owned by Mr. Erwin Grant, who used the warehouse to recover precious metals from waste received from other facilities. Mr. Grant used various chemicals to recover precious metals from various liquids and ores which contained trace amounts of these metals. Large amounts of toxic and reactive chemicals, such as acids, cyanides, ether, and material containing heavy metals were stored in containers ranging from glass vials and jars to 55

- gallon drums. There was also a large amount of debris such as carpet, paper, wood, cardboard, fiberglass insulation, and old industrial equipment. Description of Contamination : Samples from debris and dust in the warehouse show up to 6,000 parts per million of lead and other heavy metals, such as cadmium and chromium. USEPA spent approximately $1.2 million cleaning up the site. Sources of Information : EPA Region 10. “Grant Warehouse, Portland, Oregon. 26 August 2005. 20 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/cleanup.nsf/4 c5259381f6b967d88256b5800611592/82c9736 b1f1fe6ec882567060002af0e!OpenDocument Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, “Environmental Cleanup Site Information (ECSI) Database Site Summary Report

– Details for Site ID 2385.” (n.d.) 21 October 2006. http://www.deq.state.or.us/wmc/ECSI/ecsidetail.asp?seqnbr=2385 USEPA. “Consent Decree Civil No. 00

- 1536

- BR.” January 2004. 19 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/R10/CLEANUP.NSF/9f3c21896330b4898825687b007a0f33/82c 9736b1f1fe6ec882567060002af0e/$FILE/ATT0ONEX/Grant%20CD..pdf USEPA. “Grant Warehouse Removal.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 21 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/cactinfo.cfm?id=1002090 USEPA. “USEPA Grant Warehous e.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 19 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110017344177 USEPA. “Superfund Fact Sheet Grant Warehouse Removal.” January 1999. 19 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/r10earth/offices/oec/grant2.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

262 USEPA. “Superfund Fact Sheet Grant Warehouse Removal.” January 2000. 19 January 2 006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/R10/CLEANUP.NSF/9f3c21896330b4898825687b007a0f33/82c 9736b1f1fe6ec882567060002af0e/$FILE/200grant.PDF Additional Contacts : Jeff Rodin (OSC), (206) 553

- 6709 Krista Rave (Outreach Coordinator), (206) 553

- 6686Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

263 Site Information: Site Name: High

- Tech Now EPA ID No.: ORQ000021402 Address: 2338 NW Reed St., Portland, OR 97210 County: Mu ltnomah NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and/or Description of Recycling Operation: High

- Tech Now processed computer equipment by shredding it prior to sending it off site for metals recovery. The site was incorporated as High

- Tech N ow, Inc. in March 2001. In April 2001, the site was moved to a warehouse in Portland, which was rented from the Freeman Group. The warehouse had two shredders to break down electronic devices into their various components for recycling. The site accepte d everything that could be plugged in or had batteries except for white appliances such as stoves and refrigerators. The site negotiated contracts with large corporations, schools, and municipalities to pick up and recycle their electronics. In February 2002, the site began accepting computer screens that contained cathode ray tubes (CRTs), charging customers between $5 and $10, based on size. High

- Tech Now intended to pulverize the glass and transport it to Encycle, a glass recycler. Description of C ontamination: A major fire occurred at the High

- Tech Now Inc. facility on June 8, 2002, destroying hundreds of computer monitors and other computer

- related components that were stored at the building for the company’s recycling operation. High

- Tech Now and its president, Ryan Henry Kell, leased the building from its owners, The Freeman Group. Kell failed to follow up on hazardous waste determinations after the fire, eventually abandoning the property and forcing the owners to arrange and pay for the proper disposal of about 112 tons of toxic hazardous waste. On Nov. 20, 2003, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issued Kell and High

- Tech Now Inc. a total of $71,962 in penalties. The majority of the total ($52,385) was for storing hazardous waste at the facility from June 9, 2002 through Oct. 17, 2002 without a hazardous waste storage facility permit. In many cases, wastes were left on the ground or in open containers before being cleaned up and disposed in October 2002. DEQ fined Kell another $9,600 for failing to perform a hazardous waste determination at the facility after the fire occurred, and $9,977 for failing to file a hazardous waste generation report with DEQ. In March 2004, Kell was sentenced to 30 days in jail and $5,000 for sec ond degree unlawful disposal, storage or treatment of hazardous waste. Lead from the computers and computer components shredded at the site was present in the wastes left behind after the fire. DEQ alleged six hazardous waste streams in the High

- Tech N ow warehouse after the fire from the lead in the CRTs in three different brands of computer monitors, in the dust from under the grinder and near the door, and in the shredded circuit boards. Testing of these substances revealed unsafe levels of lead. Sources of Information: Bachman, Jeff (Oregon DEQ), (503) 229

- 5950, Interview. 19 December 2005.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

264 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. “DEQ Issues $71,962 in Penalties to Vancouver Man for Hazardous Waste Violations at Portland Computer Recycling Bu siness.” 11 December 2003. 18 January 2006. http://www.deq.state.or.us/news/prDisplay.asp?docID=1441 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. “DEQ Issues $71,962 in Penalties to Vancouver Man for Hazardous Waste Violations at Portland Computer Recycling Business.” 11 December 2003. 18 January 2006. http://www.deq.state.or.us/news/prDisplay.asp?docID=1441 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, “Environmental Cleanup Site Information (ECSI) Database Facility Summary Report

– Details for Location 47083.” (n.d.) 21 October 2006. http://deq12.deq.state.or.us/fp20/FPDetail.aspx?SiteID=47083 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. “Man Sentenced to 30 Days in Jail for Unlawful Disposal, Storage of Hazardous Waste after June 2002 Computer Recycling Warehouse Fire.” 25 March 2004. 22 January 2006. http://www.deq.state.or.us/news/prDisplay.asp?docID=1519 USEPA. “Facility Detail Report: Freeman Group The Former Hitech Now Fac” EnviroFacts Warehouse . (n.d.) 21 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?pgm_sys_id_in=ORQ0 00021402&pgm_sys_acrnm_in=RCRAINFO USEPA. “Freeman Group The Former Hitech Now Fac” RCRAInf o . (n.d.) 21 October 2006. Additional Contacts: Jeff Bachman (Oregon DEQ), (503) 229

- 5950Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

265 Site Information Site Name: Lighting Recyclers, Inc. EPA ID No.: ORQ000005629 Address: 651 N. Russell St., Portland, OR 97227 County: Multnomah NPL Site: N o In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Lighting Recyclers was a state

permitted (solid waste permit) lamp facility operating in northeast Portland from 1997 to 1999. Description of Contamination: During a compl aint investigation in 1999, it was found that the facility had exceeded its permit hazardous waste storage limits. Hazardous waste was found stored in an uncovered dumpster. Waste from the dumpster was found entering a nearby storm drain. The company wa s also found to be mishandling mercury powder, some of which was blowing out through the door of the facility. Also, the company improperly accumulated and stored more than 13,000 pounds of glass contaminated with mercury at the site. Emission control equipment had been removed from the lamp crusher. Lighting Recyclers received a $62,340 civil penalty on April 20, 2000, for violating hazardous waste management laws and the company’s solid waste permit. Required financial assurance was not available to a ssist cleanup when facility closed. Sources of Information : Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. “DEQ Levies Penalties Totaling $367,286 During March

- April.” 25 May 2000. 22 January 2006. http://www.deq.state.or.us/news/prDisplay.asp?docID=434 US Army Corps of Engineers. “HTRW Center of Expertise Information

– TDSF.” (n.d.). 22 January 2006. http://www.environmental.usace.army.mil/library/pubs/tsdf/sec6

- 3

- 4/sec6

- 3

- 4.html USEPA. “Lighting Recyclers Inc.” RCRAInfo . (n.d.) 21 October 2006. Additional Contacts : Les Carlough (Enforcement Program Manager), (503) 229

- 5 422Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

266 Site Information Site Name: ThermoFluids Inc. EPA ID No.: ORQ000001974 Address: 6400 SE 101ST AVE BLDG 4A, Portland, OR 97266 County: Multnomah NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The Thermo Fluids facility conducts used oil recycling. Description of Contamination : The Thermo Fluids facility was the location of a four

- alarm fire fueled by the oil recycling activities of the business the morning of March 15, 2004. A main operations building that contained a used oil pit, with a capacity of nearly 37,000 gallons, ignited, and quickly engulfed the building despite the efforts of over 140 firefighters that responded to the fire. Despite efforts by firefighters from several jurisdictions the fire quickly engulfed the building and spread ash and soot into the air and downwind. Water that was poured onto the fire to contain its spread overwhelmed the industrial property's oil and water separator unit and spread used oil and other potential hazardous chemicals into an adjacent drainage ditch which flows into Johnson Creek, a tributary of the Willamette River. The source of what ignited the used oil pit is unclear. In addition, on April 28, 2003 there was a discharge of 2,500 gallons of used oil from the vehicle which contaminated surface water. Sources of Information : Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. “Facility / Site Information for Location 9801.” Oregon DEQ Facility Profiler 2.0 . (n.d.) 21 October 2006. http://deq12.deq.state.or.us/fp20/FPDetail.aspx?SiteID=9801 USEPA. “Facility Detail Report for Spencer Environmental Incorporated.” Envirofacts Warehouse . (n.d.) 21 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?pgm_sys_id_in=ORQ0 00001974&pgm_sys_acrnm_in=RCRAINFO USEPA. “Thermo Flui ds.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. 22 March 2004. 22 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/Thermofluids USEPA. “Thermo Fluids.” Pollution Reports. 22 March 2004. 22 January 2006. http://www.epaosc.org/polrep_profile.asp?site_id=763 USEPA. “Thermo Fluids Inc.” RCRAInfo (n.d.) 21 October 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Oregon

267 Additional Contacts : Chris Kaufman (State OSC), kaufman.chris@deq.state.or.us Dan Heister (OSC) , heister.dan@epa.gov Michael Szerlog (OSC), szerlog.michael@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

268 Site Information Site Name: Breslube

- Penn, Inc. EPA ID No.: PADO89667695 Address: 84 Montour Rd., Coraopolis, PA 15108 County: Allegheny NPL Site: Final: 06/17/1996 In CERCLIS Database: 0301139 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: In the mid

- 1970s, American Tallow and Wiseman Oil Companies conducted operations at thi s site. American Tallow operated a meat

- rendering business and discontinued operations at the facility around 1977. Wiseman Oil Company operated a waste oil processing and reclamation facility at the site. Used oils were re

refined into fuel oils and sold to residual fuel users. Wiseman Oil also manufactured lubricating oil from the used oils for a short period of time during its operation of the facility. A filtering agent clay was generated as a residue from the filter during this process. The filter cake was stockpiled in the southwestern portion of the property. In February 1981, sampling of accumulated sludge material within the diked areas surrounding the on

- site oil storage tanks indicated elevated levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Wiseman Oil and American Tallow had operated a lagoon in the southwestern end of the property. Oily plating waste from a Westinghouse plant in New Jersey was allegedly disposed of in this lagoon. Runoff from the lagoon and spillage onto the ground throughout the property caused ground water contamination. The lagoon was backfilled in 1979 but the waste was not removed from the lagoon. Breslube

Penn Inc. acquired the property and facility in 1982 after Wiseman Oil declared bankruptcy. Breslube

- Penn continued waste o il reprocessing operations during which time contamination occurred. The company built tanks on the former location of Wiseman's lagoon and also constructed a lubricating oil reprocessing plant. The filter cake from this operation was generally collected i n a roll

- off box and disposed of both off and on site. Breslube

- Penn discontinued fuel oil reprocessing in 1986. The facility was utilized as a waste oil transfer station from 1986 through late 1991 when operations at the facility ceased. Three tanks were installed for use in oil transferring operations. Description of Contamination: A sampling site inspection was conducted at the facility in October 1988. Samples collected from the staged contaminated soil area, the filter cake area, and other areas on site revealed elevated concentrations of volatile and semivolatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs), PCBs, and several inorganic compounds, including cyanide. Downgradient groundwater samples contained volatile and semivolatile contaminants and PCBs. Samples collected from the two on

- site wells indicated elevated levels of VOCs. Sources of Information: Pennsylvania Department of Health Under Cooperative Agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. “Public Health Assessment Breslube

- Penn Inc., Superfund Site.” 14 May 1997. 22 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/breslube/bre_toc.htmlAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

269 USEPA. “Breslube

- Penn Inc.” CERCLIS. 7 December 2005. 23 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0301139 USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Breslube

- Penn, Inc.” August 2005. 22 January 2006. http://epa.gov/reg3hwmd/super/sites/PAD089667695/index.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Breslube

- Penn, Inc.” 17 June 1996. 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0301139.pdf USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Breslube

- Penn Inc.” RCRAInfo . 6 June 2006. 21 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain ?p_handler_id=PAD089667695 Additional Contacts: Marjorie Easton (OSC), (304) 234

- 0251 Bhupendra Khona (RPM), (215) 814

- 3213 Larry C. Johnson (RPM), (215) 814

- 3239Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

270 Site Information Site Name: East Penn Manufacturing Co., Inc. EPA ID No.: PAD002330 165 Address: Deka Road, Lyon Station, PA 19536 County: Berks NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: East Penn Manufacturing Co., Inc. operates a manufacturing facility on 289 acres in a primarily rural area. East Penn manufactures lead

- acid storage batteries, battery cables, hold downs, terminals, and booster cables and operates a secondary lead smelter as part of its battery recycling operations. The site was issued a RCRA Permit in June 1988. In June 1998, the permit expired and was reissued in September 2004. The site is still in operation. Description of Contamination : Onsite soil is contaminated with antimony, lead, and mercury. Onsite groundwater is contaminated with chlorinated organics , trichloroethene (TCE) , and tetrachloroethene (PCE). Corrective action measures include excavation and treatment of contaminated soil and battery case waste (from the past recycling operations), improved wastewater treatment facilities, and ongoing groundwater extraction/treatment, and monitoring. Contamination did occur on the site between 1980 and 1986. RCRA Corrective Action activities at East Penn facility are being conducted under the direction of a joint lead by USEPA and Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). Any necessary clean up and monitoring activities are being implemented in accordance with USEPA Corrective Action Permit. East Penn excavated and removed approximately 3,800 cubic yards of battery case waste and 9,700 cubic yards of contaminated soils above 1,000 parts per million (ppm) lead from the Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) Battery Case Landfill. Sources of Information: Hon, Lee (Project Manager), (215) 814

- 3419, Interview. 18 November 2005. USEPA. “RCRA C orrective Action Site Progress Profile for East Penn Mfg Co.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 21 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler _id=PAD002330165 USEPA. “Redevelopment and Reuse Fact Sheet East Penn Manufacturing Company.” (n.d.). 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/ca/pdf/eastpenn.pdf USEPA. “Region 3 GPRA Baseline RCRA Corrective Action Facility East Penn Manufacturing Co., Inc.” (n.d.). 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/ca/pa/pdf/pad002330165.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

271 Additional Contacts: Hon Lee (EPA Region 3 Project Manager), (215) 814

- 3419, lee.hon@epa.gov Linda Housal (PA Department of Environmental Protection), (717) 705

- 4919 Douglas A. Donor (Sr. RCRA Technical Advisor), (215) 814

- 3394, donor.douglas@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

272 Site Information Site Name: Franklin Slag Pile (MDC Industries, Inc.) EPA ID No.: PASFN0305549 Address: 3110 Castor Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19134 County: Philadelphia NPL Site: Final: 9/5/2002 In CERCLIS Database: 0305549 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The MDC site comprises approximately 4 acres and contains a large copper slag pile of 68,000 cubic yards called the Franklin Slag Pile. The slag in the pile was a byproduct of the nearby copper smelting operation of Franklin Smelting and Refinery Corporation (FSRC). The slag was bought, stored, and then sold by MDC Industries, Inc. (MDC). MDC had been selling the slag as grit for sandblasting, in 50

- lb bags and b y the truckload, since the 1950s. MDC ceased operations and abandoned the site on December 30, 1999, due to bankruptcy. The Franklin Slag Pile was not a RCRA

- permitted facility. Description of Contamination: While in operation, materials from the Franklin Slag Pile migrated beyond property boundaries in all directions. Slag was observed on sidewalks, caked on storm drains emptying into the Delaware River, in a wetland area, and being carried offsite by the wind. In December 1999, MDC was cited by EPA Region 3 for releasing lead in storm water run - off that was captured by storm drains and discharged into the Delaware River. After operation ceased, elevated levels of heavy metals were found onsite and offsite of the MDC property, as contaminants leaked from the perimeter of the Franklin Slag Pile during storage. The contamination was cumulative, occurring throughout the 40

- plus year operation. Air was contaminated with beryllium, copper and lead. Slag samples revealed leachable concentrations of lead above 35,000 μg/L and total lead concentrations above 9,000 mg/kg. Other contaminants include beryllium, copper, and lead in the air. In 2000, USEPA conducted emergency cleanup activities, removing 12,000 tons of contaminated soil and slag, 246 tons of haz ardous debris, and 20 tons of bagged slag. Sources of Information: Matzko, Kristine (RPM), (215) 814

- 5719, Interview 17 June 2005. Taylor, Trish (CIC), (215) 814

- 5539, Interview 15 June 2005. USEPA. “Community Involvement Plan for the Franklin Slag Pile Superfund Site.” January 2006. 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/super/sites/PASFN0305549/cip/01

- 2006.pdf USEPA. “Franklin Slag Pile (MDC).” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 22 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0305549Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

273 USEPA. “Franklin Slag Pile Superfund Site.” 12 September 2006. 21 October 2 006. http://epa.gov/reg3hwmd/super/sites/PASFN0305549/index.htm USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Franklin Slag Pile.” April 2004. 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/npl/PASFN0305549.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Franklin Slag Pile (MDC).” 5 September 2002. 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.g ov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0305549.pdf Additional Contacts Kristine Matzko (RPM), (215) 814

- 5719, matzko.kristine@epa.gov Trish Taylor (CIC), (215) 814

- 5539, taylor.trish@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

274 Site Information Site Name: Gettysburg Foundry Specialties Company EPA ID No.: PAD003009362 Address: 2664 Emmitsburg Rd., Gettysburg, PA 17325 County: Adams NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Descripti on of Recycling Operation: This 49

- acre site was used as a secondary aluminum smelter producing aluminum ingots from recycled aluminum. The company recycled about 100 million pounds of aluminum scrap each year. It was in operation from 1956 to March 13, 1997. Description of Contamination: Site activities resulted in large quantities of dross waste, which consisted of salts, impurities, aluminum oxides and other metals being deposited on site. In July 2000, the former owners of the now

- defunct facility , Creed F. White and Robert L. White were each sentenced to one year of confinement and five years of probation. The owners pled guilty in March 2000 to felony charges of intentional disposal of hazardous waste and operating an illegal hazardous waste tre atment facility and misdemeanor charges of operating an illegal residual waste disposal facility, air pollution, and surface and ground water pollution. The Whites also pleaded guilty to polluting the wetlands, which is a summary offense. In addition, Cre ed White pleaded guilty to a second

- degree felony charge of operating an illegal hazardous waste storage facility. Two former owners of the now

- defunct Gettysburg Foundry Specialist Co. have pleaded guilty in Adams County Court to multiple criminal charges of illegally dumping tons of hazardous waste. The environmental crimes violations resulted in an estimated $5 million cleanup of severe soil, water and wetlands contamination. The owners were ordered to pay up to $5.5 million in restitution for the cleanup of the former foundry site. The now

- defunct Gettysburg Foundry Specialist Company was also ordered to pay $33,100 in fines. The owners instructed their employees to dump baghouse dust, a black powdery material created during the foundry process, into a pit about the size of a football field. The dust, containing cadmium and lead, was collected in the foundry’s filtration system and emptied into 55 gallon drums that were buried in the pit. Approximately 2,000 pounds of baghouse dust were produced each mo nth at the foundry. Emissions from the baghouse collection system created air pollution that migrated into neighboring properties. 90 tons of baghouse dust were illegally stored in barrels at the foundry. Furnace waste from burning scrap metals in the aluminum casting process was also buried in the pit. The dross contained high concentrations of aluminum, copper, zinc and chromium. The owners were also charged with illegally mixing baghouse dust with residual waste that was hauled to two landfills that w ere not permitted to accept hazardous waste. The landfill companies were unaware they were accepting hazardous waste.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

275 Sources of Information: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. “DEP Orders Gettysburg Foundry to Shut Down Furnace.” 22 N ovember 1996. 23 January 2006. http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/polycomm/update/11

- 22

- 96/11229616.htm Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protectio n. “Former Foundry Owners Plead Guilty to Environmental Crimes.” 17 March 2000. 23 January 2006. http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/polycomm/update/03

- 17

- 00/031700u2.htm Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. “Gettysburg Foundry Owners Sentenced to Prison.” 21 July 2000. 23 January 2006. http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/polycomm/update/07

- 21

- 00/072100u4.htm USEPA. “Gettysburg Foundry Specialties Company.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 23 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000841386 Wolf, Cindy (File Room) (717) 705

- 4700, Interview 15 November 2005. Additional Contacts: Sandy Roderick (PA DEP), (717) 705

- 4931 Susan Frank (PA DEP), (717) 705

- 4931Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

276 Site I nformation Site Name: Industrial Solvents and Chemical Co. EPA ID No.: PAD098732118 Address: Box 212, Steven Road, York Haven, PA 17370 County: York NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Industrial Solvents and Chemical Company (ISCC), an 8.9

- acre site, stored, repackaged and sold products; reprocessed solvents; transported, stored and distributed recycled solvents; recycled and distributed used and new oil; and transported and stored haz ardous wastes. The Aerosol Company (Aerosol) owned and operated the site for an unknown period of time prior to ISCC. Aerosol went bankrupt by 1974 and the property was acquired by the York County Industrial Development Authority (YCIDA). At this time, ISCC began leasing from YCIDA. In 1969, complaints reportedly began regarding potentially contaminated groundwater in the vicinity of the site. A supply well was drilled in 1974 and was discovered to be contaminated with volatile organic compounds. Howev er, In June 1990, ISCC and its owners filed for bankruptcy and operations were ceased in May

- June 1990. When ISCC abandoned the site, there were approximately 194 aboveground storage tanks and thousands of 55

- gallon drums, 5

- gallon carboys and other assorted containers of smaller volumes present at the site. The site did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination: Groundwater is contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The contamination affected several residential and commercial wells. The abandoned drums and tanks, totaling more than 600,000 gallons of wastes (the majority being hazardous), were successfully removed from the Site between December 1993 and August 1995. As of 1998, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Quality had paid $3.3 million for clean up costs at ISCC with a final remedy at the site likely to cost another $1 to $1.3 million. As of 1998, PA DEQ had entered into approximately 40 consent decrees and consent order and agreements with over 600 potentially res ponsible parties for a total cost recovery of $4,384,120. Sources of Information: Bilash, Kevin (EPA Project Manager), (215) 814

- 2796, Interview. 18 November 2005. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Quality. “Office of Chief Counsel 19 98 Annual Report.” 1998. 23 January 2006. http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/chiefcounsel/1998_annual_report.pdf Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Qu ality. “Cost Recovery Efforts at Industrial Solvents Prove Successful.” 5 December 1997. 23 January 2006. http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/polycomm/update/ 12

- 05

- 97/12059714.htmAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

277 USEPA. “Region 3 GPRA Baseline RCRA Corrective Action Facility Industrial Solvents & Chemicals Co.” 30 June 2005. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/c a/pa/pdf/pad098732118.pdf USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Industrial Solvents & Chemicals Co.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 21 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=PAD098732118 USEPA. “Industrial Solvents & Chemical Company.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 23 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000701964 Additional Contacts: Kevin Bilash (EPA Project Manager), (215) 814

- 2796 Susan Frank (PA DEP Community Relations Coordinator), (717) 540

- 5013Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

278 Site Information Site Name: PECO Energy Company (Exelon) EPA ID No.: PAD000731026 Address: Jeffrey Street and Delaware Avenue, Chester PA 19013 County: Delaware NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No
Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The PECO Energy Company site is a 90

- acre site bordering the Delaware River. Prior site uses include coal

- fired electricity generation, coke and steel production, industrial chemical and resin manufacturing, and hazardous waste recycling. The Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Company (PICCO) operated its settling basin for resin disposal until 1981, when PECO removed 5,000 cubic yards of resinous material. Chem Clear operated its hazardous waste treatment and recycling facility between 1977 and 1989. Description of Co ntamination: Most contamination is on 17 acres of the site where resin manufacturing and hazardous waste recycling activities took place. The Chem Clear recycling hazardous waste operation was responsible for some of the contamination. On

- site soil is c omposed of fill containing resins and tar fragments. Contaminants include BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), light non

- aqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs), and heavy metals. Onsite groundwater is contaminated with BTEX, PAHs, LNAPL, and semi

- volatile organic compounds. Groundwater contamination led to sheens of BTEX and PAHs spreading onto the surface of the Delaware River. Of the 90 acres, 17 are currently under an agreement to construct a remedy for past h azardous waste activities. The remainder of the site was characterized under Pennsylvania’s Land Recycling and Environmental Remediation Standards Act (“Act 2"). USEPA, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) and PECO worked together to develop a plan to remediate the entire site. Sources of Information: Dao, Khai M. (EPA Region 8), (215) 814

- 5467, Interview 11/18/2005. USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Peco Energy Co Gould Chemclear Inc.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 21 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=PAD000731026 USEPA. “Redevelopment and Reuse Fact Sheet PECO Energy (Philadelphia Electric Company) Chester, PA.” (n.d.). 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/ca/pdf/peco.pdf USEPA. “Region 3 GPRA Baseline RCRA Corrective Action Facility Peco Energy Co., Chester Facility.” (n.d.). 22 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/ca/pa/pdf/pad000731026.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

279 Additional Contacts: Khai M. Dao (EPA Region 3 Contact), (215) 814

- 5467 or

- 5761, dao.khai@epa.gov Renee Gelblat (RCRA Project Manager), (215) 814

- 3421, gelblat.renee@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

280 Site Information Site Name: Tonolli Corporation EPA ID No.: PAD073613663 Address: Rte 54, Nesquehoning, PA 18240 County: Carbon NPL Site: Final: 10/4/1989 In C ERCLIS Database: 301087 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : From the early 1920s to 1972, the site was used as a disposal area for coal mine spoils and incinerator ash from a nearby Pennsylvania Power and Light (PP&L) power generating station. In 1972, Tonolli Corporation purchased 30 acres of the site and from 1974 to January 1986, operated a battery recycling and secondary lead smelting plant onsite. Operations included storage, breaking, processing, and smelting of used batteries, battery components, and other lead

- bearing materials. The site consists of a battery receiving and storage area, crushing operation, smelter, refinery, wastewater treatment plant, above

- ground 500,000

- gallon wastewater storage tank, a rubber

- lined waste lagoo n, and a 10

- acre rubber lined solid waste landfill. Four primary waste streams were generated from site operations; slag from the secondary lead smelting process, which was disposed of in the landfill; calcium sulfate sludge from air pollution control scrubbers, which was pumped to the landfill; plastic battery casings and bakelite chips, which were disposed of in the landfill; and excess process water, battery acid, and stormwater runoff, which went to the wastewater lagoon to be neutralized and recirculated back into the lime slurry air scrubbers. In October 1985, Tonolli filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Federal bankruptcy code. The site did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : The primary contaminants of concern affecting the soil, sediment, debris, ground water, and surface water were metals, including arsenic, cadmium, and lead. Occasionally, liquid from the impoundment has found its way into the landfill. The impoundment held waste water containing arsenic, cadmium, lead , and chromium. On

- site monitoring wells contained arsenic and cadmium in 1985. Contamination definitely occurred prior to 1980 and contamination also probably occurred after 1980. As of September 2004, cleanup expenditures at this site amounted to $3,6 25,983.96. Sources of Information: Cron, Mitch (RPM), (215) 814

- 3286, Interview 18 November 2005. USEPA. “EPA Superfund Explanation of Significant Differences: Tonolli Corp.” 7 January 1997. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/e0397015.pdf USEPA. “EPA Superfund Explanation of Significant Differences: Tonolli Corp.” 12 March 1999. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/e0399129.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Pennsylvania

281 USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Tonolli Corp.” 30 September 1992. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0392156.pdf USEPA. “Five Year Review Report Tonolli Corporation Superfund Site.” 2003. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa. gov/superfund/sites/fiveyear/f03

- 03018.pdf USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 23 January 2006. USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Tonolli Corp.” 4 October 1989. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0301087.pdf USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet: Tonolli Corporation.” June 2005. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/npl/PAD073613663.htm USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Tonolli Corp Superfund Site.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 21 October 2006. http://oa spub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=PAD073613663 USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Tonolli Corp.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 23 January 2006. http ://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0301087 USEPA. “Tonolli Corporation.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 23 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.g ov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110008471073 Additional Contacts: Mitch Cron (RPM), (215) 814

- 3286 Richard M. Fetzer, (215) 814

- 3263 William D. Hudson, (215) 814

- 5532Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Puerto Rico

282 Site Information : Site Name: Scorpio Recycling, Inc. EPA ID No.: PRD9873 76662 Address: State Road #2 KM 19.7 (Acuna Street), Candeleria Ward, Puerto Rico 00759 County: Toa Baja Municipality NPL Site: Final: 2/4/2000 In CERCLIS Database: 0203570 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Scorpio Recycling, Inc. (SRI) is a 6.5

- acre metal recycling company that purchases, accumulates, and processes a variety of scrap metals for resale to foundries in the United States and Brazil. The facility began operating in 1972 as Astur Metals, Inc. and changed its name t o Scorpio Recycling, Inc. in 1988. The site contains five main areas: battery accumulation and aluminum cans compacting building, aluminum processing building, offices and red metals processing building, maintenance shop, and batteries and other metals ac cumulation building. The facility is located between karst hills in an aquifer recharge area. Since the time when battery crushing ceased, the site has been used for the temporary storage of scrap steel. Available facility records indicate that the faci lity receives approximately 9

- million pounds of scrap material per month from outside sources. The site is still in operation today. Description of Contamination : Scorpio Recycling, Inc. is still under investigation by USEPA. Over 2.4 million batteries were crushed and stored at the Scorpio site between 1972 and 1982. Battery fluids were dumped directly onto the soil. Packaging and shipping of batteries continued until 1982. In 1991, poor housekeeping practices were observed at the site, including st ained and corroded floors, spills, batteries on the ground and on pallets, lead battery cells open to the atmosphere, acidic runoff flowing into the sinkhole area, and stressed vegetation. USEPA testing in 1991 and 1993 revealed that onsite soil and water had been contaminated with barium, lead, and vanadium. USEPA testing in 1999 in the former battery crushing area revealed surface soil lead concentrations of 109,000 ppm. Across the entire Scorpio site, the average surface soil lead concentration was approximately 18,000 ppm. Release to area groundwater has occurred and is a potential threat to the aquifer and local drinking water supply. Over 1,000 tons of scrap metal needed to be removed from the site. Sources of Information: Torres, Ramon (EPA RPM ), (787) 977

- 5844, Interview. 8 July 2005. USEPA. “EPA Places Contaminated Scorpio Recycling, Inc. Site in Toa Baja on the Superfund National Priorities List.” 3 February 2000. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region02/news/2000/00022.htm USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet Scorpio Recycling, Inc.” April 2004. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/superfund/npl/0203570c.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Puerto Rico

283 USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Scorpio Recycling, Inc.” 22 October 1999. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0203570.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Scorpio Recycling, Inc.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 21 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0203570 USEPA. “Scorpio Recycling Corp.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 23 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110018864371 Additional Contacts: Juan Davi la (SAM), (212) 637

- 4341 Ramon Torres (RPM), (787) 977

- 5844Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Puerto Rico

284 Site Information Site Name: V&M / Albaladejo EPA ID No.: PRD987366101 Address: Route 160, Almirante Norte Ward, Vega Baja, PR 00694 County: Vega Baja Municipality NPL Site: Deleted: 10/22/2001 In CERCLIS Database: 0202869 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This site consists of more than five contiguous areas where unknown individuals dumped and burned plastic

- coated electrical cables, batteries, and electrical equip ment for metals recovery. The sites are on the boundary of the V&M and Albaladejo Farms, both of which are privately owned. Open burning of refuse began at an unknown point in time and continued until 1986 on the V&M property and until 1988 on the Albaladejo property. The Agency spent about $2.4 million on the site cleanup, which took 4 months to complete. Description of Contamination : A soil removal action was conducted in early 1998 in which nearly 3,000 cubic yards of soil was removed from five identified burn areas where soil was contaminated with various metals, including antimony, cadmium, copper, lead, and silver. Four rounds of groundwater sampling, conducted through groundwater

- monitoring wells, indicate that contamination associated with the metals recovery activities is not present in the groundwater. High levels of lead, arsenic, copper, zinc, antimony and cadmium were detected and heavy metal contamination was also found in surface water on the site and in sinkholes within the immediate vi cinity of the site. As of October 2000, USEPA spent $2.4 million on the site cleanup. Sources of Information: USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: V&M/Albaladejo.” 29 September 2000. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0200511.pdf USEPA. “Federal Register Notice of Direct Final Action.” 22 October 2001. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/d011022.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Fact Sheet V&M/Albaladejo.” January 2004. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/superfund/npl/0202869c.pdf USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for V&M/Albaladejo.” 23 December 1996. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0202869.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for V&M/Albaladejo.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 21 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0202869Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Puerto Rico

285 USEPA. “The V&M / Albaladejo Farms Superfund Site in Vega Baja No Longer a Threat: No Further Federal Action Warranted.” 3 October 2000. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/news/2000/00180.htm USEPA. “V&M/Albaladejo.” 9 Sep tember 2005. 23 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region2/superfund/npl/0202869c.htm Additional Contacts: Juan Davila (EPA Site Assessment Manager), (212) 637

- 4341 Caroline Kwan (EPA Remedial Project Manager), (212) 637

- 4275Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Rhode Island

286 Site Information Site Name: Efros Barrel Co. EPA ID No.: RID980732135 Address: RFD #1 Box 1346 Salvas Avenue, Coventry, RI 02825 County: Kent NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The 0.42

- acre site was an undeveloped property prior to 1969. The property was purchased in 1969 by a private owner. From 1969 to 1990, the property was used to receive, store, and dispatch used 55

- gallon drums for recycling. Description of Contamination: The Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RI DEM) Solid Waste Division inspected the property in 1978, and documented 500 to 600 55

- gallon drums on the property; inspectors also observed spilled material on the ground and detected a chemical odor in the ambient air. Analytical results of sampling indicated the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). In spri ng 1978, RI DEM Division of Air Resources received telephone complaints regarding Efros Barrel. In 1982, a complaint was filed with RI DEM Division of Air and Hazardous Materials, which alleged that partially filled drums had been disposed of on the property. In 1982, RI DEM issued a Notice of Violation and Order to Efros Barrel. There are no groundwater monitoring wells located on the property. In 1981, groundwater samples were collected by RI DEM from two drinking water wells located in the vicinity of the property. Analytical results indicated the presence of VOCs and groundwater has not been sampled since. Analytical results of soil samples collected from the property in 1994, indicated the presence of pesticides and metals at concentrations greater th an concentrations indicated by background samples. Impacts to on

- site soils may be partially attributable to historical operations at the property. Sources of Information: USEPA. “Efros Barrel Co.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 23 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/arcsites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0101294 USEPA. “Efros Barrel Co.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 23 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110009321723 USEPA. “Efros Barrel Co.” RCRAInfo . (n.d.) 21 October 2006. USEPA. “Waste Site Cleanup and Reuse in New England: Efros Barrel Co.” 3 February 2003. 23 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r1/npl_pad.nsf/0/e2956d1334062e7e85256b420060685f?OpenD ocument Additional Contacts:Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Rhode Island

287 Gerardo Millán

- Ramos (SAM), (617) 918

- 1377, millan

- ramos.gerardo@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Rhode Island

288 Site Information Site Name: Metals Recycling, LLC EPA ID No.: RID980732135 Address: 89 Celia Street, Johnston RI 02919 County: Providence NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Metals Recycling LLC is an 18

- acre site which purchases and recycles old cars, appliances and scrap metal. When vehicles arrive on site, they are dismantled and shredded, leaving behind one of three types of by

- products: iron, non - iron metals and auto shredder residue (ASR). From the late 1980s to January 1999, ASR was used as a daily cover at the Central Landfill until a joint state and federal investigation resulted in a cessation of shipments to the Central Landfill. Description of Contamination: In 1999, USEPA testing revealed that auto shredder residue was improperly stored, which caused contamination. The auto shredder residue also contai ned PCBs in excess of 50 parts per million. In November 2001, Metals Recycling LLC entered into two administrative consent orders with USEPA for violations of RCRA. The company agreed to pay $200,000 in penalties and reduce lead contamination in piles of improperly stored, nonmetallic hazardous waste at its 18

- acre site. Metals Recycling violated regulations regarding operation, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous waste and in December 2003, Metals Recycling was ordered to pay $250,000 into the state’s environmental response fund. Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) also issued three air pollution violations in 2000 and 2001 for objectionable odors resulting from their process water holding basin going septic and causing hydrogen sulfide odors throughout the neighborhood. Metals eventually modified their process to prevent large amounts of process water with organics (ASR residues) going into the pond. Metals paid RIDEM $32,500 in penalties on these cases. Metal Recycling was also forced to pay a $25,000 penalty and perform cleanups which amounted to $500,000 for water violations stemming from processing and storing auto shredder residue on their process which was the result of contamination that was initially dis covered in 1993. Sources of Information: Daily Environment Report No. 220. “Rhode Island Recycler to Pay $200,000 Fine.” BNA, Inc. 16 November 2001. 23 January 2006. http://pubs.bna.com/NWSSTND/IP/BNA/den.nsf/SearchAllView/C6E1709CF80A976D8 5256B06001098A9?Open&highlight=RECYCLER Mastrati, Gail (Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

– RI DEM) gail.mastrati@DEM.RI.GOV , Email 18 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Rhode Island

289 USEPA. “Metals Recycling, LLC.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 23 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110002370470 USEPA. “Metals Recycling, LLC.” RCRAInfo . (n.d.) 21 October 2006. Additional Contacts: Mark Merchant (Office of the Regional Administrator, EPA New England), (617) 918

- 11013 G ail Mastrati (RI DEM), 222

- 4700 ext. 2402 Stephanie Powell (RI DEM), 222

- 4700 ext. 4418Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Rhode Island

290 Site Information Site Name: New England Container Co. EPA ID No.: RID048976732 Address: 455 George Washington Hwy, Smithfield, RI 02917 County: Providence NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0101242 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This property was owned by Air Park Industrial Development Corporation until 1968 and Goodyear Realty until 1970. The New England Container Co. has occupied the property since 1970. Since 1971, the New England Container Co. has engaged in the reconditioning and recycling of used 55

- gallon metal drums. There are two large buildings on site: the open head drum plant and the closed head drum plant. Most areas of the property were paved between 1975 and 1981. Wastes generated at the property between 1987 and 1991 were composed of paint sludge, solvents, flammable liquids, and sandblasting grit mixed with paint sludge. Waste was disposed of to the ground surface and to catch basins on the property. The New England Container Co. has been cited by Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management for hazardous waste violations including lack of secondary containment, failure to label containers, and failure to maintain documentation of employee training. Description of Contamination: Contaminants of concern detected in groundwater beneath the property include lead, chlorinated volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and non

- chlorinated VOCs. Soils beneath the asphalt on the property are suspected to be a source of VOCs, including tetrachloroethene (PCE) and 1,1,1

- trichloroethane. Chlorinated VOCs have been detected in private drinking water wells located 0.25 miles north and east of the property. Contaminants detected in the private drinking water wells include tetrachloroethene, trichloroethane, 1,2

- dichloroethane, 1,1

- dichloroethane, dichloromethane, and chloroform at concentrations as high as 17 parts per billion (ppb). Impacts to nearby groundwater drinking water supply sources have been documented. Sources of Information: USEPA. “New England Container Co.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 23 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/c sitinfo.cfm?id=0101242 USEPA. “New England Container.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 23 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000819936 USEPA. “Waste Site Cleanup & Reuse in New England New England Container Co.” 3 February 2003. 24 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.g ov/r1/npl_pad.nsf/0/474b4a3be4843e2285256b4200606d7e?OpenD ocumentAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Rhode Island

291 Additional Contacts: Gerardo Millan

- Ramos (EPA SAM), (617) 918

- 1377, millan

- ramos.gerardo@epa.gov Nancy Smith (EPA SAM), (617) 918

- 1436 Cynthia Gianfrancesco, (401) 222

- 2979 x7126, Cynthia.Gianfrancesco@dem.ri.gov Margaret Bradley, (401) 222

- 2979 x7105Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling South Carolina

292 Site Information Site Name: Aqua

- Tech Environmental, Incorporated (Groc e Laboratories) EPA ID No.: SCD058754789 Address: 340 Robinson Road, Greer, SC 29651 County: Spartanburg NPL Site: Final: 2/4/2000 In CERCLIS Database: 0403310 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: In the 1940s local residents used this site as a general dumping ground. The City of Greer owned 35 acres of the 61.56

- acre property and used 20 acres as a municipal landfill from 1963 until 1968. The landfill was subsequently closed and capped with clay in the early 1970s. In December 19 74, William Groce purchased the 35 acres from the City of Greer. He began accepting hazardous wastes as Groce Laboratories, Incorporated in 1976. Between 1982 and 1986, he purchased the remainder of the 61.56

- acre property. Site operations consisted of st ate

- permitted hazardous waste treatment, recycling, storage, and disposal activities. In April 1987, Aqua

- Tech purchased the facility and continued hazardous waste operations at the site under the name of Aqua

- Tech/Groce Laboratories. In 1990, Aqua

- Tech ch anged the name of the facility to Aqua

- Tech Environmental, Inc. The site also received bio

- medical wastes and low

- level radioactive wastes without obtaining the necessary permits. Aqua

- Tech's clients included manufacturing industries, federal agencies, high schools, universities, and hospitals. Several parcels of the 61.56

- acre property have been sold in county tax auctions since December 1996. From 1981 through 1991, mismanagement, violations, and non

- compliance with state and federal regulations occurre d. The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) and USEPA frequently cited the facility for improper management of hazardous waste containers, leaking and bulging drums, storage violations, spills, unpermitted detonations, an d other management deficiencies. Leaking and open drums, deteriorated compressed

- gas cylinders, spills, and discolored soils were observed at the site on several occasions. In an attempt to correct these problems, several administrative consent orders were issued. According to records, a 55

- gallon drum fire was reported on March 4, 1990. The drum contained elemental phosphorus. One firefighter was reportedly overcome by the dense smoke and 90 people were evacuated from the area. On April 19, 1990, an on

- site explosion occurred when workers attempted to repack two drums containing ignitable mixtures. On July 10, 1990, a controlled explosion was used to destroy two additional drums containing ignitable mixtures. Aqua

- Tech filed for bankruptcy on October 1 1, 1991. The site did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination: Primary contaminants include metals (cadmium, chromium, cobalt, lead, mercury, nickel, and zinc.), various volatile organic compounds, and other contaminants. Soil onsite is c ontaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi

- VOCs (SVOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, and metals. Groundwater is contaminated with VOCs, SVOCs, and metals. Surface water was also contaminated. Upon closing there were appro ximately 7,000 drums and lab packs, 97 above

- ground tanks, 1,200 gas cylinders (some containing phosgene and other toxic gases), unexploded ordnance material, andAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling South Carolina

293 small amounts of low

- level radioactive material and biohazard material at the site. Many of the drums, tanks, and cylinders were deteriorated, leaking, and improperly stored. Containers and debris were located throughout the 35

- acre facility. Over 41,000,000 pounds of hazardous waste were sent to the Aqua

- Tech (Groce Labs) site. Cleanup expenditures at this site as of 2004 were $ 1,927,901.08. Sources of Information: South Carolina Department of Health and Environment Control with Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. “Public Health Assessment

- Aqua

- Tech Environmental, Incorporated .” 23 March 2001. 24 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/aquatechblue/ate_p1.html#backa USEPA. “Aqua

- Tech Environmental Inc.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 25 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0403310 USEPA. “Aqua Technology Environmental Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 23 January 2 006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000618779 USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 23 January 2006. USEPA. “NPL Site Fact Sheet Aqua

- Tech Environmental Inc. (Groce Labs).” 22 December 2005. 25 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/npl/nplsc/aquatesc.htm USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Aqua

- Tech Environmental, Inc.” 16 December 1994. 24 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0403310.pdf USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Aqua

- Tech Environmental Inc.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 21 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=SCD058754789 USEPA. “Record of Decision Summary of Remedial Alternative Selection Aqua

- Tech Environmental Labs Inc. (Groce Labs) Site.” September 2003. 25 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/npl/nplsc/aquarod.pdf Additional Contacts: Ralph Howard (EPA SAM), (404) 562

- 8 829 Yvonne Jones (EPA RPM), (404) 562

- 8793 William Joyner (EPA RPM), (404) 562

- 8795 Mike Norman (EPA RPM), (404) 562

- 8792 Paul Wagner (EPA RPM), (404) 562

- 8792 Craig Zeller (EPA RPM), (404) 562

- 8827Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling South Carolina

294 Site Information Site Name: Conbraco Industri es EPA ID No.: SCR000006155 Address: 1509 S. Van Mungo Boulevard, Pageland, SC 29728 County: Chesterfield NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Conbraco Industries has been in the brass foundry bu siness since 1957. The company has facilities in both North and South Carolina. They originally conducted all foundry operations at their Matthews, North Carolina facility. In March 1998, the foundry operations were moved to Pageland, South Carolina and the Matthews facility stopped manufacturing brass casting products. The facility manufactures brass casting products that are used in brass valves, regulators, and other control devices. Brass casting is manufactured by a process that uses sand for mo lding and for core

- making. The brass used is approximately 85% copper, 5% tin, and 5% lead. The facility uses a process known as the greensand molding process (which is the most common type of molding process in the U.S.). During the process, contaminants entered the system until the level became too high, enough to render them inefficient (approximately 6

- 8 tons a day). To maintain efficiency, some of the sands were sent to a thermal reclamation unit (reclaimer). After being reclaimed, the sands were either reused or disposed. According to Conbraco, all of the sand disposed from mid

- April/October 1998 to January 2000, was either used as fill material at the Steven Kinlaw property in Pageland, SC or stored on

- site at the facility pending pick

- up. Des cription of Contamination: Copper and lead are the contaminants of concern. Conbraco believed that the sands which they treated from 1998 to 2000 were non

- hazardous after being treated in their reclaimer. In January 2000, Conbraco conducted TCLP and disc overed that the treated sand tested above the RCRA level of 5.0 ppm for leachable lead. Conbraco now ships all waste sand to a hazardous waste landfill. In June 1987, the Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch of the North Carolina Department of Hum an Resources (NCDHR) entered into an Order requiring Conbraco to cleanup two piles of lead contaminated waste sand that had been accumulating at its Matthews, NC, site since 1957. The work was completed in 1991. Conbraco stated that in 1997, during the c ourse of performing clean closure on the contaminated sand piles (pursuant to the 1987 Order), they discovered that not all of the foundry sand was legally disposed. As a result of the activities related to the two piles of lead contaminated waste sand an d the sands treated from 1998 to 2000, Conbraco was required to identify and remediate 17 different sites (seven in North Carolina and 10 in South Carolina). At these 17 sites, lead and copper contaminated foundry sand was sold to horse farms as fill for their stable and riding areas. Investigation is on

- going and thus far, it has been determined that no further action is required at six of the facilities.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling South Carolina

295 On September 24, 2002, P&L Bark Nursery, Inc. (P&L) of Pageland, South Carolina, was issued a RCRA § 7003 Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Order. During 1997

- 1998, P&L purchased approximately 375 tons of foundry sand from Conbraco Industries to be bagged and sold as play sand. The sand, which had been treated by Conbraco Industries, contained levels of lead above regulatory limits. P&L packaged and marketed the entire inventory of sands as play sand, and over an 8

- month period in 1997 and 1998, sold the sands to approximately 40 different retailers throughout Georgia, Virginia, North Carolina an d South Carolina. USEPA’s Order requires P&L Bark to undergo a series of investigative measures, including written notifications, to identify as many end users of the play sand product as possible. Sources of Information: EPA Region 4. “Fiscal year 200 2 Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report.” 2002. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/ead/attachments/2002_accomplishments_report.pdf EPA Region 4. Untitled data on TRI facilities. (n.d.). 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region4/r4data/tris/trifac_sc.txt EPA Region 4. Memorandum from Beverly Banister, Acting Dire ctor, Waste Management Division to Susan Parker Bodine, Assistant Administrator, Solid Waste and Emergency Response. “Waste Management Division Weekly Report

– Key Items.” 13 January 2006. McKee, Nancy (USEPA Region 4) mckee.nancy@epa.gov , Email 13 February 2006. USPEA. “Conbraco Industries Incorporated.” RCRAInfo . (n.d.) 21 October 2006. USEPA. “Final Administrative Order on Consent.” 24 October 2001. 13 February 2006. USEPA. “Information Requests Pursu ant to Section 3007 of the RCRA. Responses of Conbraco Industries, Inc.” (28 April 2000). 13 February 2006. Additional Contacts: Nancy McKee (USEPA Region 4), (404) 562

- 8674, mckee.nancy@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling South Carolina

296 Site Information Site Name: Huff Battery Salvage EPA ID No.: SCD987566908 Address: 134 Warner Road, Bowman, SC 29018 County: Orangeburg NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0405416 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The 10.8

- acre site is the loc ation of a former lead

- acid battery cracking operation and lead recovery process that operated from the late 1970's until approximately 1984. The facility's owner and operator collected old car and tractor batteries from across the State. During operatio ns, the batteries were cut open and the lead plates were recovered, smelted, and sold off site. Various processes including smelting, washing and shredding were performed on site. These processes resulted in several waste streams including battery casing s, chipped battery casings, waste battery acid, and lead

- acid contaminated rinse water. The chipped casings were initially left in the operations area. Later, both chipped and fully intact casings were land filled in another portion of the site. The battery acid and waste water flowed along a concrete pad and into two partially buried tanks. Mr. James Huff passed away in 2001, leaving Ms. Huff as the sole resident and caretaker of the property. Also, in 2001, the property was sold for a sum of $5.00 to Ms. Huff's son, Cecil Marion Ayers, Jr. of Barnwell, South Carolina. Response costs at this site were around $1.2 million. This includes direct contractor costs for the site clean up and assessment and does not include USEPA overhead. Description of Contamination: Recycling operations resulted in residual lead contaminated soils and debris onsite. Behind the residence were the remnants of the lead

- acid battery cracking operations area. This area was enclosed within a barbed wire fence. The former process equipment was still on site. Additionally, several waste piles (battery casings and chips) were located throughout the operations area. A separate area of battery casings and chips was identified across the road from the former operations area. This area was used as a landfill for the chipped casings and tractor battery casings which were not chipped. Sources of Information: Misenheimer, Kevin (On

- Scene Coordinator) misenheimer.kevin@epa.gov, Email 12 December 2005. USEPA. “Huff Battery Salvage.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 21 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0405416 USEPA. “Huff Battery Salvage.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.) 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110013797757Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling South Carolina

297 USEPA. “Huff Battery Salvage.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n. d.) 20 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/HuffBattery Additional Contacts: Kevin S. Misenheimer (OSC), (404) 562

- 8922 misenheimer.kevin@epa.gov Wilda W. Cobb (Region 4), (404) 562

- 9530Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Tennessee

298 Site Information Site Name: College Grove Battery Chip EPA ID No.: TNSFN0406979 Address: Arno College Grove and Horton Road, College Grove, TN 37046 County: Williamson NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0406979 Si te History and Description of Recycling Operation: Twenty or 30 years ago, battery casings were given away to community members and used as fill or driveway paving material. The site consists of residential properties that contain battery chips that were p laced in driveways, around barns and other areas as fill material. A local lead smelting operation provided the chips to landowners for use as a fill or aggregate substitute in driveways, around barns, and in other areas. The chips were not treated to remo ve residual lead prior to their distribution, creating a lead exposure risk to residents to contacting the chips or the soil contaminated by lead washed from the chips. Description of Contamination: USEPA began a Superfund removal on June 19, 2000 including extensive sampling of each property to determine contaminated soil locations, excavation and treatment of contaminated soil, transportation and disposal of materials in a proper landfill, and restoration of the site (including backfill, grade, and reve getation). The removal was expected to be completed by June 2001 at an estimated cost of $3,000,000. Elevated lead levels were detected at 96 of the 109 properties. USEPA conducted removal actions at each of these properties, reducing lead to acceptable levels. The final project cost was approximately $7.25 million dollars. As of May 2003, battery chips have been confirmed at 109 of the 171 properties evaluated in College Grove and the surrounding area. Previous sampling of some properties indicated elev ated levels of lead in the soil. Sources of Information: EPA Region 4. "EPA Superfund Removal to Begin at College Grove Battery Chip Site, College Grove, Tennessee." 14 June 2000. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/oeapages/00press/000614.htm Federal Register (Volume 70, Number 207). Page 61974. “College Grove Battery Chip Superfund Site; Notice of Proposed Settlement.” 27 October 2005. 25 January 2006. http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/05

- 21459.htm Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation. "EPA Clos es College Grove Field Office." May 2003. 20 January 2006. http://www.state.tn.us/environment/dsf/grovemay03.phpAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Tennessee

299 Tennessee Department of Public Health. “College Grove Battery Chip H ealth Consultation Report.” (n.d.) 20 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/collegegrove/cgr_p1.html USEPA. “College Grove Battery Chip.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 20 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0406979 Additional Contacts: Femi Akindele (RPM), (404) 562

- 8809 Randy Bryant (RPM), (404) 562

- 8794 Loften Carr (RPM), (404) 562

- 8804 Tony DeAngelo (RPM), (404) 562

- 8826 Beth Walden (SAM), (404) 562

- 8814 Robert West (RPM), (404) 562

- 8806 Nestor Young (RPM), (404) 562

- 8812Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Tennessee

300 Site Information Site Name: Dixie Barrel & Drum EPA ID No.: TND034692632 Address : 2120 Jones Street, Knoxville, TN 37920 County: Knox NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0407666 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The Dixie Barrel & Drum Site is an abandoned two

- story office, warehouse and production facility. The facility formerly operated as a steel and plastic drum reconditioning business from about 1976 until closing mid

- year in 2002 under a petition of bankruptcy and after numerous environmental violations went unaddressed by the company's officers. Their pro cess included emptying the drum material into on - site storage tanks and then cleaning and restoring the drum through a series of chemical processes (using acids, caustics, and paints). Numerous violation at the site were found after an inspection on Augus t 23, 2001, including waste running in a 6

- inch wide stream across the facility floor where employees worked. Currently, approximately $1.2 million has been spent on clean up at this site. Description of Contamination: The area was contaminated with numerous hazardous substances including lead, chromium, ethyl benzene, and trichloroethylene. Drums stored on site were found in poor condition and stored next to other incompatible chemicals thus elevating the risk of fire and explosion. Sources of Information: EPA Region 4. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 31 October 2005. USEPA. “Dixie Barrel & Drum.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 20 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0407666 USEPA. “Dixie Barrel & Drum.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.). 20 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/DixieBarrel&Drum Wil ls, Jennifer. (Assistant Regional Counsel, EPA Region 4) 404

- 562

- 9562 Interview, 21 November 2005. Additional Contacts: David Andrews (OSC), (404) 562

- 8763, cell: (404) 434

- 8837, andrews.david@epa.gov Sherryl Carbonara (CIC), (404) 562

- 8611 Steve Spurlin (OSC), (731) 394

- 8996 David Dorian (OSC), (404) 562

- 8767, dorian.david@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Tennessee

3 01 Site Information Site Name: Far Star EPA ID No.: TNN000407643 Address: 979 Horse Mountain Road, Shelbyville, TN County: Bedford NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 407643 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The former Far Star company recycled cassette tapes, compact discs, and vinyl phonograph record components during the mid 1990's. The recycling process included a wash line containing sodium hydroxide to dissolve and remove the labeling from the media. Unprocessed media was stored outside of the building. Description of Contamination : In November, 1996, Far Star was issued an order by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) Division of Solid Waste Management (DSWM) for improper storage and disposal of waste. Far Star failed to comply with the order. TDEC inspectors discovered that the facility had been abandoned in 2001. A vast number of abandoned drums, many of which were unlabeled, were corroded and/or leaking at the site. Sources of Information : USEPA. “Far Star.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 20 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0407643 USEPA. “Far Star.” On

- Scene Coordinator. (n.d.) 20 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/FarStar Additional Contacts : Terrence Byrd (OSC), byrd.terrence@epa.gov , (404) 562

- 8755 Bob Bittinger (R4 POLREP distribution list, ERRB), bittinger.bob@epa.gov David Randolph (TDEC State Representative), david.randolph@state.tn.us Steve Spurlin (OSC), (731) 394

- 8996 Jackie Harvey (EPA), (404) 562

- 8882Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Tennessee

302 Site Information Site Name: Jack Goins Waste O il EPA ID No.: TND981022395 Address: 801 15 th St. N.E., Cleveland, TN 37311 County: Bradley NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0406904 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Jack Goins Waste Oil site was an oil collection and recycling facility between 1985 and 1999. Although the facility is closed, the owner/operator, Mr. Jack Goins, continues to perform some activities on site, such as vehicle maintenance and oil filter crushing. The facility includes three buildings, a warehou se, and an office. The garage was used for vehicle maintenance and equipment storage. The warehouse contains the oil filter press and also provides storage space for equipment, tools, and supplies. The warehouse contained 20 to 30 55

- gallon drums. Many of these drums contained crushed and uncrushed oil filters, while other drums contained lubricating oils or were empty. Eleven above

ground storage tanks (AST) are also located on the facility property and the adjacent property. Description of Contami nation: In 1999, as a result of serious contamination at the site from years of inadequate waste oil storage and handling practices, USEPA conducted a clean

- up action during which 105,000 gallons of contaminated waste oil, 85,000 gallons of wastewater, and 224 cubic yards of contaminated soil were removed and shipped offsite for proper disposal. The site is contaminated with lead and benzene. Sources of Information: EPA Region 4. “Administrative Record Index: Jack Goins Waste Oil Removal Site.” 30 Nov ember 1999. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region4/waste/errb/goinsar.pdf EPA Region 4. “Fiscal Year 2002 Enforcement & Compliance Assurance Accomplishments Report.” (n.d.) 20 Janu ary 2006. http://www.epa.gov/Region4/ead/attachments/2002_accomplishments_report.pdf USEPA. “Jack Goins Waste Oil.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.) 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110004982626 USEPA. “Jack Goins Waste Oil.” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 20 January 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0406904 Additional Contacts: Mary C. Johnson (Associate Regional Counsel USEPA, Region 4), (404) 562

- 9526Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Tennessee

303 Site Informati on Site Name: Refined Metals Corporation EPA ID No.: TND067690040 Address: 257 West Mallory Avenue, Memphis, TN 38109 County: Shelby NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Refined Metals Corporation was a lead smelter. In 1990 and 1991, National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) violations at this facility were recorded by monitors near the facility. As a result USEPA designated the portion of Memphis in Shelby County, Tennessee, around the Refined Metals Corporation secondary lead smelter as a lead nonattainment area on January 6, 1992. In 1996, USEPA conducted an inspection of this facility and found that violations were due to compliance issues (i.e., poor housekeeping methods). During the second quarter of 1998, a violation of the lead NAAQS occurred in the Shelby County nonattainment area. Subsequently, the MSCHD issued a Notice of Violation giving Refined Metals, Inc. options to surrender all of its permits or pay a fine and conduct extensive remodeling of the facility. Refined Metals, Inc. chose to surrender all of its permits and shut down permanently on December 22, 1998. As a result, the 1994 submittal was no longer applicable and MSCHD withdrew and replaced it with a new submittal dated March 17, 2000. The site was issued a RCRA permit in September 2002. Description of Contamination: Unknown Sources of Information: EPA Region 4. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 31 October 2005. Federal Register 65: 56794

- 56797. “Approval and Promulgation of the Implementation Plan for the Shelby County, Tennessee Lead Nonattainment Area.” 20 September 2000. 21 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA

- AIR/2000/September/Day

20/a24042.htm USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile

- Refined Metals Corporation.” 6 June 2006. 21 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=TND067690040

. USEPA. “Refined Metals Corporation.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 21 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000374112. USEPA. “Refined Metals Corporation.” RCRA Info . 16 October 2002 . 18 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Tennessee

304 Additional Contacts: Matt Love Dustin, (610) 921

- 4063Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Tennessee

305 Site Information Site Name: Ross Metals, Inc. EPA ID No.: TND096070396 Address: 100 N Railroad Street, Rossville, TN 38066 County: Fayette NPL Site: Final: 4/1/1997 In CERCLIS Database: 0403822 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Fifteen acres of this 200

- acre parcel were used by Ross Metals (RM) in a secondary lead smelting operation from 1978 to 1992. The facility was RCRA

- permitted; however, it is unclear when the permit was issued. They primarily used lead from spent lead

- acid batteries but also recovered other materials including lead plates, lead oxide, scrap metal, etc. Ross melted the lead and cast it into ingots for resale. From 1978 until June 20, 1992, RM operated a secondary lead smelter at the site. Prior to 1978, the property was undeveloped. RM produced specification alloyed lead that was sold for use in manufacturing vehicle batteries, lead shot pellets, and sheet lead (radiation shiel ds). The facility received spent lead acid batteries, spent lead plates, lead oxide, scrap metal, and other lead waste and material from various businesses and industries, including battery crackers and battery manufacturers. The primary material used for the recycling process was spent lead acid batteries, with automotive and industrial batteries accounting for 80 percent of the raw material processed. The remaining 20 percent consisted of other lead

- bearing materials, such as recycled dross, dust slag, an d factory scrap. Facility operations included not only the smelting of lead and other scrap metals but a variety of other products, such as crushed drums, limestone, steel, and cast iron. These materials were added to the blast furnace as flux to create a reducing atmosphere. Wastes generated from the process included slag, plastic chips, waste acid, lead emission control dusts, and lead

- contaminated stormwater. Upon receipt, batteries were stored on pallets located east and southeast of the facility; each pallet held about 50 batteries. The batteries were then conveyed to the wrecker building for the battery breaking operation. According to facility representatives, 99 to 99.5 percent of the lead content was recovered. The molten lead product was then move d to the refinery area. Acid and sludge obtained during the battery breaking operation contained residual amounts of lead and lead acid; the acid and sludge were transferred to the wastewater treatment unit to reclaim the remaining lead. Lead was reclaimed by allowing it to settle further in aboveground collection tanks. This lead sludge, collected prior to neutralization, was transferred to the blast furnace area and immediately fed into the furnace. The remaining acid was neutralized with liquid caustic s oda. Upon neutralization, the solution was held for additional settling to precipitate dissolved metals. Sludge resulting from the neutralization process was also collected in settling tanks and recycled into the blast furnace with other lead scrap. Several areas of the operating facility contained large volumes of lead

- bearing materials. With the exception of the container storage area, the lead

- bearing materials were not containerized; instead, they were placed on the asphalt foundation of the facility or directly on facility soils.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Tennessee

306 From 1979 until December 1988, blast slag that had accumulated as a part of the smelting process was disposed of in an on

- site landfill. USEPA's RCRA Compliance Section conducted a sampling investigation on December 7, 1988, to determine if the waste generated at the facility should be regulated. On December 20, 1988, the Tennessee Department of Health and Environment (TDHE) suspended all further processing of the request until results from the USEPA sampling event could be a ssessed and the USEPA could determine whether the blast slag was a nonhazardous waste. Several references in the USEPA files for the RM Site debate the status of blast slag as a hazardous waste. File material also indicates that on April 20, 1990, RM appli ed for a solid waste classification variance for the blast slag. A sampling investigation was also conducted on May 9, 1990, to determine if smelting and landfilling activities at the facility were causing adverse environmental impacts. The variance was denied on June 6, 1990, because USEPA determined that blast slag was a hazardous waste and subject to the full extent of RCRA regulations. In September of 1990, RCRA issued a Complaint and Compliance Order against Ross Metals. After several months of extens ive negotiations, the parties reached an agreement to settle the case. However, the company never signed the Consent Agreement, because of its precarious financial condition. In 1992, Ross Metals, Inc. received an Administrative Dissolution under Articles of Incorporation. There is no known successor entity. Because of this, all State and Federal RCRA enforcement actions at the Site ceased. Once negotiations failed with Ross Metals and all operations ceased at the facility, the Site was referred to USEPA's Emergency Response and Removal Branch (ERRB). On June 15, 1994, ERRB conducted a Site visit. Based upon ERRB's file review and Site visit, the Ross Metals Site met the criteria for a high priority removal action. The removal action began in September 199 4 and was completed in June 1995. The removal consisted of segregating, staging, or removing 46 waste streams. Approximately 6,000 cubic yards (CY) of lead

- bearing blast slag was staged in on - site buildings. An Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) was finalized in February 1998. In considering the information presented in the EE/CA and the statutory limits which apply to non

time critical removal actions, USEPA determined that a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Report that develops appropri ate remedial action alternatives was needed for this site. On March 24, 1998, USEPA sent general notice letters to the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs). The threat of human exposure and reports of trespassing caused USEPA to perform a removal action in June and September of 1998. About 10,000 CY of slag are landfilled in an unlined and unsecured area located just north of the facility process area. About 6,000 CY of stockpiled lead slag material are still stored at the facility inside deteriorating sh eet metal buildings. The buildings are no longer providing protection from weather conditions because of deterioration. Data collected in the investigation revealed lead

- contaminated surface soils (outside the fenced facility

- approximately 8.58 acres). This area is adjacent to residential property and is located within a designated wetland. The removal action consisted of placing tarpaulins over the 6,000 CY of stockpiled lead slag and installing security fencing around the contaminated surface soils and landfill. The Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study was finalized in November 1998.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Tennessee

307 A RCRA permit was issued in September 1990. The RCRA permit was terminated in September 1993. Clean up expenditures at this site as of September 2004 are $9,990,564.07

. Description of Contamination : Contamination included lead, barium, cadmium, and zinc. Approximately 4,400 gallons, 170 tons, and 1,700 cubic yards of wastes were removed from the site. Significant quantities of blast slag still remain on

- site. C ontamination was most likely related to spillage of battery acid and slag material left at the site. These contaminants affected surrounding lands and seeped into groundwater. Lead

- contaminated surface soil is present across the site. Lead concentrations in most surface soil and sediment samples collected throughout the site exceeded 400 ppm. In addition, aluminum, antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, copper, iron, manganese, selenium, and vanadium were detected above risk

- based remedial goal option (RGO) levels. In addition, high levels of subsurface soil contamination were found in two isolated locations in the process area; east of the wrecker building, and southeast of the truck wash. Analytical results of groundwater samples revealed the presence of several inorganic compounds at concentrations that either exceed the primary or secondary drinking water standards or the State of Tennessee domestic water supply criteria. Aluminum, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, nickel and vanadium were detected above respective guidance concentrations and/or RGO levels. Analytical results of surface water samples revealed concentrations of several inorganic compounds that exceeded background concentrations. Significant inorganic contaminants inc luded antimony, arsenic, cadmium, iron, lead, and manganese. As a result of the baseline risk assessment completed for the RI, COCs were defined for soil and groundwater. For the protection of human health, aluminum, antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, copper, iron, lead, manganese, selenium, and vanadium were defined as soil COCs. Groundwater COCs include aluminum, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, manganese, nickel, and vanadium. The ecological risk assessment conducted for the RM site identified wetlands north and east of the facility, as well as the facility itself, as areas of concern and evaluated the degree of contamination in wetlands farther from the facility that had not been previously evaluated. The ecological risk assessment conclu ded that of the metals calculated to pose a potential risk, lead posed the highest risk to the ecological risk receptors at the site. Sources of Information: Hey, Andy (Paralegal) (404) 562

- 9522, Interview. 22 November 2005. Matory, Derrick (RPM) (404) 5 62

- 8800, Interview. 12 November 2005. USEPA. EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Ross Metals Operable Unit 2.” 17 September 2002. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0402076.pdf USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 20 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Tennessee

308 USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Ross Metals, Inc.” 1 April 1997. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0403822.pdf USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Ross Metals.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 21 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=TND096070396 USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Ross Metals, Inc.” CERCLIS . 11 September 2006. 21 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0403822 USEPA. “Tennessee NPL/NPL Caliber Cleanup Site Summaries: Ross Metals.” 12 December 2005. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/npl/npltn/rossmetn.htm Additional Contacts : Beth Brown (RPM), (404) 562

- 8814 Derrick Matory (RPM), (404) 562

- 8800 Andy Hey (paralegal), (404) 562

- 9522Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

309 Site Information : Site Name: Aztec Mercury EPA ID No.: TXD061284105 Address: 970 Callaway Drive, Alvin, TX County: Brazoria NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and/or Description of Recycling Operation : From 1974 to 1985, mercury was recycled at this s ite. An enforcement order issued by the Texas Water Commission on May 13, 1986, required operations to cease. During its operations, there were no controls on the management of the hazardous waste and the man operating the site had no hazardous waste permits. The site did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : A remedial investigation to determine the nature and extent of contamination was completed July 11, 1994. Results indicated that mercury contamination of soils and ditch sediments on the site at potentially harmful levels. A baseline risk assessment concluded that further action was needed to eliminate any potential imminent and substantial endangerment to human health and the environment. Following approval of the baseline risk a ssessment, a feasibility study (FS) report was submitted and reviewed. The FS report developed three alternatives, with excavation and off

- site disposal as the preferred alternative. As a result of the removal of soil and sediment, there is no longer a so urce for groundwater contamination. The site no longer presents an endangerment to public health or the environment and was deemed suitable for residential use. Sources of Information: Boucher, Carol (Texas Commission Environmental Quality) (512) 239

- 25 01, Interview 9 December 2005. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. “Texas Superfund Site: Aztec Mercury, Inc.” 10 August 2006. 22 October 2006. http://ww w.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/superfund/state/aztecmer.html USEPA. “Aztec Mercury Inc.” RCRA Info. 2 September 2000. 16 January 2006. Additional Contacts: Carol Boucher (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality), (512) 239

- 2501 cboucher@tceq.state.tx.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

310 Site Information: Site Name: Baldwin Waste Oil EPA ID No.: TXD980626987 Address: Farm Road 1889, Robstown, TX County: Nueces NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and/or Des cription of Recycling Operation : The property was leased for use as a waste oil processing facility from 1978 to 1986. The site was inspected by the Texas Water Commission in November 1986 and found to be abandoned. Contaminants include hydrocarbons, metals, nonvolatile organics. As of September 2004, clean up costs at the site amounted to $1,635,504.01. Description of Contamination : Preliminary investigations of analyzed soil samples indicated elevated lead, chromium, barium, and arsenic concentration s. Sources of Information: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. “Superfund Site Profile: Baldwin Waste Oil.” 30 June 2006. 22 October 2006. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/superfund/state/baldwin.html USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2005. 20 January 2006. Additional Contacts: Carol Dye (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality), (512) 239

- 1504Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

311 Site Information S ite Name: CFF Recycling Titanium Fire EPA ID No.: TXN000605636 Address: 7501 Wallaceville Rd, Houston, TX 77020 County: Harris NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0605636 Description of Contamination: On November 15, 2003, a fire broke out at the CFF Recycling facility as a result of cutting titanium rods in a heat exchanger with a plasma torch. The titanium fire could not be extinguished and the fire was left to burn itself out. Upon arrival, Houston HazMat determined from information provided by the PRP that the fire was emitting a hazardous plume. The fire burned itself out and CFF Recycling committed to cleaning up the surrounding area. Sources of Information: USEPA. “CFF Recycling Titanium Fire.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 22 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0605636 USEPA. “CFF Recycling Titanium Fire.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.). 20 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/CFFRecycling Additional Contacts: Rita Engblom (OSC), engblom.rita@epa.gov Jon Rinehart (SAM), (214) 665

- 6789Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

312 Site Information Site Name: Dixie Oil Proce ssors, Inc. EPA ID No.: TXD089793046 Address: 2505 Choate Rd, Friendswood, TX 77546 County: Harris NPL Site: Final: 10/4/1989 In CERCLIS Database: 0600006 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The site was originally a copper reco very and hydrocarbon washing facility operated by Intercoastal Chemical Company from 1969 to 1978. In 1978, Dixie Oil Processors (DOP) began oil recovery including cuprous chloride catalyst, hydrocarbon washing, oil washing, and blending/distilling residu es. Dixie went on to store wastes on site and transport them off site for disposal or recycling and ultimately shut down five years later. The original operation used a series of lagoons that are still on site. There is a creek that runs along the western border of the site. The site did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : Contamination was the result of mismanagement of recyclables. Often, materials were left on the ground before being recycled and residuals were left on the ground following the recycling process. Spills from the operations have contaminated the nearby Mud Gully and Clear Creek. DOP detected lead, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and copper in on - site wells. DOP removed 6000 cubic yards of contaminated soil. At lea st six lagoons with accumulated copper sediment and 500 barrels of a copper catalyst are allegedly buried on site. Sources of Information: Meyer, John C. (RPM), (214) 665

- 6742, Interview 8 December 2005. USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Dixie Oil Processors, Inc.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0600006 USEPA. “Dixie Oil Processors, Inc.” RCRA Info. (n.d.) 23 October 2006. USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Dixie Oil Processors.” 31 March 1988. 20 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/superrods/index.cfm?fuseaction=data.siterods&siteid=0600006 Additional Contacts: John C. Meyer (RPM), (214) 665

- 6742 Rosemary Vazquez (CIC), (214) 665

- 8575Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

313 Site Information : Site Name: Encycle/Texas Inc. EPA ID No.: TXD008117186 Address: 5500 Up River Road, Corpus Christi, TX 78407 County: Nueces NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No
Description of Recycling Operation: Process and recover usable materials from metal bearing waste streams such as waste sludge generated from plating operations (F006 s eries), bag house dust and spent catalyst. The metals recovered include copper, nickel, lead, chromium, zinc, cadmium and some precious metals. USEPA and Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) alleged that Encycle/Texas, Inc., ASARCO’s wholly

- owned subsidiary in Corpus Christi, violated RCRA by failing to properly manage hazardous waste and otherwise engaging in unlawful recycling practices. EPA accused the company of misrepresenting more than 5,000 tons of material as containing metals for reclamation. Of this material, more than 300 tons of nonmetallic residues from the former Army chemical warfare depot at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal outside Denver. It is not clear what the arsenal’s material contained. The company has settled with the government. A RCRA permit was issued to the facility in September 1988. Description of Contamination: The USEPA and TNRCC won a case in 1999 that Encycle/Texas, Inc., ASARCO's wholly

- owned subsidiary in Corpus Christi, violated RCRA at the facility b y failing to properly manage hazardous waste and otherwise engaging in unlawful recycling practices. Releases of metals such as arsenic, lead, and mercury have resulted in on

site and off

- site soil contamination that will require some remedial action. Under the agreement, ASARCO will implement site

- wide corrective action at the Encycle/Texas plant and will undertake a project expected to prevent the burial of more than half

- million pounds of potentially cancer

- causing and toxic material each year in hazardous waste landfills. ASARCO also will implement an innovative new technology, electrowinning, to fully reclaim metals from waste brought to the facility costing $15 million. In addition, the company will clean up and dedicate to the public a 30

- acre co nservation area in Corpus Christi including trails, an environmental education area, and a permanent site for an air monitoring station. Sources of Information Blumenthal, Ralph. “Copper Plant Illegally Burned Hazardous Waste, E.P.A. Says.” New York Times . 12 October 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

314 Federal Register (Volume 64, Number 85) Page 23858

- 23859. “Notice of Consent Decree Under The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and Clean Water Act.” 4 May 1999. 25 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA

- WASTE/1999/May/Day

- 04/f11074.htm Toxic Texas. “Corpus Christi’s Refinery Row.” (n.d) 23 October 2006. http://www.txpe er.org/toxictour/corpus_christi.html USEPA. “Asarco will Address Alleged Hazardous Waste, Clean Water Violations.” 15 April 1999. 20 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/11a3a77209f154858525675b006d30f2?Open Document USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Encycle Texas Inc.” RCRA Info. 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getm ain?p_handler_id=TXD008117186Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

315 Site Information: Site Name: J.C. Pennco Waste Oil Service EPA ID No.: TXD982164162 Address: 4927 Higdon Road, San Antonio, TX County: Bexar NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0604940 Description of Recycling Operati on : The site was operated from May 1984 until April 1992. During its 8years of operation, the site received an unknown quantity of used barrels and various chemicals, including used oil, antifreeze, and solvents. Most of the oil and other chemicals were so ld to recyclers, and the drums were sold for use as animal feeders, trash barrels, and barbeque pits. Pollution at the site resulted from spills and discharges from the oil storage tanks and from the barrel

- cleaning activities. The site did not have a permit at any time. Description of Contamination : In 1991, Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) investigators discovered that the same types of solvents spilled on the ground at the J.C. Pennco site were present in one of the nearby residential water wells. In May 1992, the owner filed bankruptcy, and the site was abandoned. Contaminants include: chlorinated and non - chlorinated solvents, metals, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), benzene, ethyl benzene, toluene, xylene, and tetrachloride. From 1995 to 1996, in cooperation with the TNRCC and the San Antonio Water System, USEPA extended city water lines into the area. Additionally, USEPA removed approximately 4,000 drums, 120 cubic yards of soil and debris, 31,500 gallons of liquid wastes, and 23 tanks from the site to eliminate potential sources of surface and groundwater contamination. In November 1996, USEPA referred the J.C. Pennco site back to the state for further remedial action. While material was s old to recyclers, poor housekeeping practices led to contamination. On February 24, 2005, a legal notice of citation by publication was published in the Eagle Pass News Guide identifying 21 of 52 parties responsible for waste at the J.C. Pennco Waste Oil Service Superfund site. Sources of Information : Boucher, Carol (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality) (512) 239

- 2501, Interview. 9 December 2005. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. “J.C. Pennco Waste Oil Services.” 9 January 2006. 20 January 2006. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/superfund/state/jcpennco.html Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. “Community Relations Plan for the J.C. Waste Oil Recycling Superfund Site Bexar County, Texas.” November 1999. 20 January 2006. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/assets/public/remediation/superfund/ register/pdf0134.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

316 USEPA. “J.C. Pennco Waste Oil Svc: Multisystem Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . 20 January 2006. 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110005194146

. USEPA. “Site Information: J.C. Pennco Waste O il Svc.” CERCLIS. 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0604940. Additional Contacts: Carol Boucher (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality), (512) 239

- 2501 cboucher@tceq.state.tx.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

317 Site Information Site Name: Lyon Property EPA ID No.: TX0001861731 Address: London, TX County: Kimble NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This property cover s 6 acres in an area adjacent to the Llano River. A small wire burning operation was conducted at the site for metal recovery. The burn site encompassed an area of 75 feet by 60 feet. TNRCC first investigated the site in 1996 after receiving a complaint ab out burning. Description of Contamination: The soil at the site was contaminated with barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, and TPH. Clean up at the site was completed August 31, 2004. The cost of remediation was $60,717.33. Sources of Information: Dye, C arol (Project Contact) (512) 239

- 1504, Interview 7 December 2005. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. “Lyon Property.” 26 March 2004. 20 January 2006. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/superfund/state/lyonproperty.html

. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. “Lyon Property Proposed State Superfund Site Kimble County, Texas: Community Relations Plan.” September 2002. 20 January 2006. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/assets/public/remediation/superfund/ register/pdf0211.pdf Additional Contacts: Carol Dye (Project Contact), (512) 239

- 1504 or (800) 633

- 9363Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

318 Site I nformation Site Name: Malone Services Company

- Swan Lake Plant EPA ID No.: TXD980864789 Address: Loop 197, South Texas City, TX 77590 County: Galveston NPL Site: Final: 6/14/2001 In CERCLIS Database: 0602922 Site History and Description of Recyclin g Operation: The Malone Services Company (MSC) site covers approximately 150 acres. Approximately 100 acres in the northeastern portion of the site were developed for the storage, processing and disposal of industrial hazardous wastes. The facility operate d from 1964 until 1996 or 1997. MSC was originally permitted as a waste oil reclamation facility, but later added hazardous waste underground injection/disposal wells. Wastes were received by the facility from a variety of industries. Wastes from the reclamation process were disposed of in the onsite deep injection wells. The original operation, which began in 1964, consisted of two earthen unlined pits which received incoming wastes. The larger pit, which served as a settling pond, was used for wastes with high solids and/or water content. The oil fraction would rise to the surface of the large pit where it was skimmed off and pumped to a smaller oil pit. Oils in the oil pit were then pumped to one of several tanks for treatment. The oil was then resold as waste oil for energy recovery. American Petroleum Institute (API) separators were installed in 1979 and 1987 to replace the settling pond and oil pit; however the pond and pit were never cleaned/removed, hazardous liquid wastes and solids still remain in the open large pit and closed small oil pit. Oils separated in the two API units were pumped to holding/treatment tanks; waste water was pumped to the injection wells for disposal and the solids were sent to an offsite hazardous waste landfill for disposal. The site had its operating permit revoked by Texas and has been in bankruptcy since July of 1988. Description of Contamination: The two sources of contamination on the site are the settling basin surface impoundment/earthen impoundment and the oil pit. The wastewater settling pond, the waste collection pond and the stormwater pond were excavated through the shallow channel sand aquifer and into the underlying clay layer, and therefore, the wastewater ponds supply/supplied contaminants to the shallow grou nd water. Groundwater sampling results indicate that groundwater has been impacted by hazardous wastes in the area of the inactive 5

- acre impoundment and the 100 Unit Separator. The principal contaminants of concern at this site are myriad organic and inorganic chemical wastes in the form of liquids, sludges and solids present in the above ground storage tanks, the API separators, the settling pond, and the surface soils of some of the secondary containment areas on the site. Some hazardous substances such as chlorinated solvents, phenols, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), chromium, and lead have contaminated the underlying groundwater, adjacent wetlands and the bay which is a National Estuary and a major fishery. The groundwater pathway appears to be the o nly ongoing active release of hazardous substances occurring at the site.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

319 Sources of Information: Texas Department of Health under a Cooperative Agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. “Public Health Assessment: Malone Servi ces Company

– Swan Lake Plant.” 30 January 2002. 20 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/malone/msc_toc.html. USEPA. “Malone Service Company Fact Sheet.” 10 January 2006. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6sf/pdffiles/0602922.pdf

. USEPA. “Malone Services Co

– Swan Lake Plant Facility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 20 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_faci lity?p_registry_id=1100093 13484. USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Malone Service Company Inc.” 7 October 2004. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar1611.htm. USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile: Malone Service Co

- Swan Lake Plant .” CERCLIS

. 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0602922 Zehner, Warren. EPA On

- scene Coordi nator. Pollution Report to Director, OERR. 25 September 2001. 20 January 2006. http://yosemite1.epa.gov/r6/polreps.nsf/0/6f449ba1bbed17be86256c7800603cb9?OpenD ocument, Additional Contacts: Charles David Abshire (Remedial Project Manager), (214) 665

- 71 88 Alan Etheredge (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Project Manager Superfund Cleanup Section), (512) 239

- 2139 Donn Walters (CIC), (214) 665

- 6483 Anne Foster (Site Attorney), (214) 665.2169 I

- jung Chiang, (214) 665

- 2160 Karen Bond (State Coordin ator), (214) 665

- 6682 Arnold Ondarza (Region 6 Public Liaison), (800) 533

- 3508 or 303

- 312

- 6777 Warren Zehner, (On

- scene Coordinator), (281) 983

- 2229Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

320 Site Information Site Name: Many Diversified Interests EPA ID No.: TXD008083404 Address: 3617 Baer Street, Houston, TX 77020 County: Harris NPL Site: Final: 1/19/1999 In CERCLIS Database: 0605008 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Steel casting operations began at the 36

- acre site in 1926 under the company name Texas Electric Steel Cas ting Company (TESCO). Primary operations included manufacturing specialty molds and casting specialty steel parts. During the 1980s, the southern portion of the site was leased to Can

- Am Resources Group (Can

Am) to operate a spent catalyst recycling operation. Can

- Am reportedly purchased 4,236 drums of spent catalyst material from refineries and chemical plants, and stored the drums on the leased portion of the site. By 1988, the catalyst recycling operations ceased, and the stored drums were abandoned on site. In February 1991, TESCO ceased operations. Many Diversified Interests (MDI) foreclosed on the site and later reopened as the San Jacinto Foundry (SJF), a subsidiary of MDI. MDI filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy on May 20, 1992, and SJF ceased facility operations on approximately June 1, 1992. The on

- site facilities were demolished as a salvage operation under order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court between March 1995 and January 1996. USEPA is currently performing a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study ( RI/FS) at the Site. Description of Contamination: Poor housekeeping practices and site abandonment led to environmental damage. Soil samples taken in 1994 revealed elevated concentrations of arsenic, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, and nickel in the drum storage areas and an on

- site landfill. In the north and south drum storage areas, 5,355 drums are reported to contain spent catalyst from chemical companies and refineries. The drums are deteriorating and leaking; the landfill located in the southern p ortion of the site reportedly received inorganic slag and foundry sand; and approximately 41 acres of contaminated soil are located within the MDI property boundary and contaminated soil at nearby residences. Sixty

- four residences have been documented to contain contaminated soil. Sources of Information: USEPA. “Many Diversified Interests Inc Fact Sheet.” 13 January 2006. 20 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6sf/pdffiles/06050 08.pdf USEPA. “Many Diversified Interests.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. n.d. 20 January 2006. http://www.epaosc.net/site_profile.asp?site_id=06FE. USEPA. “Many Diversified Interests Facility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 20 J anuary 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=1100050 37361Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

321 USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile: Many Diversified Interests Inc .” CERCLIS . 11 September 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0605008 Additional Contacts: Stacey Bennett (EPA Region 6), Remedial Project Manager (214) 665

- 6729 Rafael Casanova (EPA Region 6), Remedial Project Manager (214) 665

- 7437 Rosemary Vasquez (CIC), (214) 665

- 8575 Greg Fife (OSC), fife.greg@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

322 Site Information: Site Name: McBay Oil and Gas EPA ID No.: N one Address: Farm Road 1272, Grapeland, TX County: Houston NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Description of Recycling Operation : From 1941 to 1959, the McBay Oil and Gas site was the location of an oil refinery. It then became a waste oil reclamation plant until all operations ceased in 1987. At that time, site facilities included approximately 30 above

- ground tanks, six earthen disposal pits, three concrete pits, and one saltwater injection well. More than 30 drums were scattered across the site. In January 1987, the site was listed on the Texas Superfund Registry. On May 9, 2003, the Texas Attorney General published a legal notice in the Texas Register, (28 TexReg 3857) proposing resolution of an environmental lawsuit against a potentially res ponsible party in accordance with §7.110 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, and inviting public written comment on the determination that the potentially responsible party has satisfied the terms and condition of the administrative order as to his divisible share of the waste, and providing for a release from the administrative order. Description of Contamination : Contaminants from the drums onsite included arsenic, barium, benzene, chromium, ethylbenzene, hydrocarbons, lead, naphthalene, and xylene. S oil on the site was contaminated, and a remedial investigation found groundwater contamination. Cleanup is still underway. Sources of Information : Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. “McBay Oil and Gas.” 15 October 2004. 21 January 2006. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/superfund/state/mcbay.html

. Additional Contacts : Alan Etheredge (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality), (512) 239

- 2139, aethered@tceq.state.tx.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

323 Site Information Site Name: Melton Kelly Property EPA ID No.: TX0000852111 Address: NE County Road 3250 S. of FM 85, Ennis, TX County: Navarro NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 06 05204 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Melton Kelly Property is 13 acres of privately owned property. The property was used by the owner (now deceased) to conduct metal salvaging operations. On or before February 1, 1994, salvag e materials (insulated copper wire, tubing, electrical parts, switches, and circuit cards, etc.) were transported to the site, placed in piles, and burned using automobile tires to ignite the debris. Recoverable metals were removed from the ash piles and presumably sold for salvage value. Remaining scrap and ash

like wastes were left in place. The site consists of three burn areas containing eight ash piles. The total burn area is almost an acre in size. In 2001, the site was listed on Texas’ Superfund registry and the site was deleted in February 2004 after cleanup of the site was deemed complete. Description of Contamination: The soil and groundwater at the site were polluted with cadmium, copper, chromium, inorganics, semi

- volatiles, and pesticides. Sources of Information: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. “McBay Oil and Gas.” 26 March 2005. 21 January 2006. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/superfund/state/melkelly.html Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. “Notice of Fi nal Deletion of Melton Kelly Property from the Texas Superfund Registry as published in the Texas Register (29 TexReg 1439

- 1440).” 13 February 2004. 21 January 2006. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/assets/public/remediation/superfund/register/pdf0261.pdf

. U SEPA. “Melton E Kelly Deceased Facility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 21 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=1100172 79452

. USEPA. “Melton Kelly Property Facility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 21 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=1100093 12715 USEPA. “Site Information: Melton Kelly Property.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 20 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0605204Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

324 Additional Contacts: Barry Lands (Project Contact), (512) 239

- 6547 or (800) 633

- 9363, blands@tceg.state.tx.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

325 Site Information : Site Name: Poly

- Cycle Industries Tecula EPA ID No.: TXT490012689 Address: FM 2064 and CR 4216, Tecula, TX County: Cherokee NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Description of Recycling Operation : Prior to May 1982, and up to January 1990, Poly

- Cycle Industries, Inc., Tecula operated as a recycler of lead from lead acid batteries. They also recycled plastic and rubber chips from ground up battery cases. The site is now inactive and abandoned. The site did not have a RCRA permit. Description of Contamination : The facility came under intense scrutiny after 1983 when a physician notified OSHA of a worker seriously ill with lead intoxication. OSHA documented approximately 24 cases of lead poisoning between October 1983 and August 1989. In 1983, the site received contaminated soil from a nearby Poly

- Cycle operation in Jacksonville. In 1984 lead contamination was documented in soils at 281,000 parts per million. Additional analysis in 1986 documented 350,000 part per million of lead in soils. Although numerous violation notices were issued, the owner failed to abide by orders or agreements to cease operations or to reduce the hazard. Finally, in 1991, USEPA was granted court authority to enter the site and abate the substantial endangerment. USEPA excavated 9 acres of contaminated soil, constructed two temporary buildings and filled them with 2,200 bags, each with 1.7 cubic yards of contaminated soil. The remaining contaminated soil was consolidated in a stockpile and covered w ith a 2

- foot soil cap that was seeded. The soil cap has since eroded. The results of February 2000 soil sampling showed lead still to be a matter of concern. Sources of Information Contacts : EPA Region 6. “POLREP No. 1 (Polycycle

- Tecula

- Supersack dis posal).” (n.d.). 21 January 2006. http://yosemite1.epa.gov/r6/polreps.nsf/0/ 837f6da1585633d286256ab80059864f?OpenD ocument Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. “Poly

- Cycle Industries, Tecul a.” 5 January 2005. 21 January 2006. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/superfund/state/polycycl

- tecula.html USEPA. “ Poly

- Cycle Industries Inc. Facility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 21 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=1100109 35417 USEPA. “Poly Cycle Industries Inc.” RCRA Info. 2 September 2000. 18 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

326 USEPA. “Poly

- Cycle Industries, Tecula.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0603919 Additional Contacts : Alonzo Arredondo (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality), (512) 239

- 2145 or (800) 633

- 9363, aarredon@tceq.state.tx.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

327 Site Information Site Name: Rockwool Industries, Inc. EPA ID No.: TXD06637964 Address: 1741 Taylor’s Valley Road, Belton, TX 76903 County: Bell NPL Site: Final: 9/29/1998 In CERCLIS D atabase: 0605009 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Rockwool Industries, Inc. manufactured mineral wool insulation from mid

- 1950s until February 1987. From 1984 to 1987, Rockwool operated under a RCRA permit. The facility manufactured two types of mineral wool insulation: blow wool and batt wool. The mineral wool was manufactured in blast furnaces using raw material such as slags from copper and antimony smelting, waste from limestone mining and coke and basalts. The raw material was melted in a coke

- fired furnace and then extruded by blowing air over spinning drums to form fibers. The residue left in the furnace from the heating of the slags was a metal “shot” type material. This “spent iron shot” was the main waste type generated as a part of the Rockwool production process. This material was piled in the North Shot Pile (NSP), the South Shot Pile (SSP), and the Cemetery Shot Pile (CSP). The NSP area began receiving spent shot material waste in the mid

- 1950s. By 1982, the NSP covere d more than 3 acres and there was no room for further expansion. The northern edge of the NSP was on the southern bank of the Leon River and waste runoff had been detected going into the River. The NSP was reduced to about 2 acres after waste was hauled to an off

- site disposal area. In 1983, a dirt cover was placed over the NSP to reduce fugitive dust and the infiltration of rain. A french drain system was installed along the northern edge of the shot pile to intercept and collect leachate as it flowed hori zontally toward the Leon River. This french drain carried the liquid to a concrete sump and the water that collected in the sump was pumped to the lined Evaporation Lagoon. It is not clear when the SSP began receiving waste; however, beginning in 1984, so me of the spent shot material was removed from the SSP and was recycled as an ingredient in brick making. The shot was mixed with cement and baghouse dust; it was shaped into bricks and then used as raw material feed for the furnace. An unknown amount of the shot was recycled in this way. It is not known when the CSP began receiving waste. Cleanup costs at the site equaled $3,122,434.09. Description of Contamination : Known sources of contamination are contaminated soils associated with the South Shot Pile (estimated to contain 20,000 to 30,000 cubic yards of waste), the North Shot Pile (estimated to contain between 15,000 and 25,000 cubic yards of waste), and the Cemetery Shot Pile (waste volume unknown). Sediment is also contaminated; however, the data are not available for the types of contaminants.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

328 Antimony, arsenic, and lead in residual waste remaining in the former baghouse dust impoundment represents the primary ground water contaminant source. Analytical results for samples collected in the vicinity of the NSP, SSP and evaporation lagoon areas also indicate waste materials as a probable antimony and arsenic source. This conclusion is also supported by the arsenic results from the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) and antimony results from the Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) tests. The TCLP results exhibited arsenic leachate concentrations up to 1.02 mg/L from fine waste material in the SSP. The SPLP results revealed antimony leachate concentrations up to 3.1 mg/L f rom the NSP samples. The absence of TCLP

- arsenic in the NSP samples and the relatively low antimony concentration in the SPLP samples from the SSP are most likely the result of waste material variations not captured by the samples. Chemical analysis of se diment samples in the Leon River and in Nolan Creek indicated the presence of inorganics in concentrations above the release criteria. The Leon River adjacent to and downstream of the seep sites revealed arsenic and lead concentrations above background levels. Analysis of sediment samples collected from the same 24 locations also revealed elevated levels of antimony, arsenic, and lead. Sources of Information: USEPA. “Final Record of Decision: Rockwool Industries Inc. Superfund Site.” September 2004. 21 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6sf/pdffiles/rockwool_rod_9_2004.pdf USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 20 September 2004. 21 January 2006. USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Rockwool Industries Inc.” 29 September 1998. 21 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n0605009.pdf USEPA. “Rockwool Industries In c Fact Sheet.” January 2006. 21 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/earth1r6/6sf/pdffiles/0605009.pdf USEPA. “ Rockwool Industries Inc. Facility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 21 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl .disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=1100093 13625 USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Rockwool Industries Inc .” CERCLIS . 11 September 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0605009 Additional Contacts: Shawn Ghose (RPM), (214) 665

- 6782Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

329 Site Information: Site Name: Voda Petroleum, Inc. (Ultra Oil) EPA ID No.: TXD061287918 Address: Duncan Road, Clarks ville City, TX 75693 County: Gregg NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0604923 Description of Recycling Operation: The Voda Petroleum, Inc site operated as a waste oil recycling facility from October 1981 until it was abandoned in November 1991. The s ite is located in a residential neighborhood with occupied residences located directly on the east and west sides. During the decade Voda was in business, the facility operated as a 600

- barrel

- perday maximum design capacity, vacuum distillation waste oil recycling facility. Voda Petroleum, Inc., received, stored, and processed lubricating oils, transmission oils, hydraulic oils, diesel oils, kerosene, gasoline, aromatic and paraffinic solvents and marketed the heavy residual oil and lubricating oil. Wastes from this process were accumulated in 55

- gallon drums for on

- site storage and/or in storage tanks prior to refining and blending. On February 10, 1989, during execution of a search warrant at the Voda Petroleum, Inc. facility, federal agents observed a ditch cut through a levee surrounding the process area. Wastewater being discharged from this ditch exceeded limits set for the Voda Petroleum, Inc. NPDES permit. The investigation was conducted by the USEPA Criminal Investigation Division with assistance from the FBI. On February 1, 1993, in the Northern District of Texas, Ronald L. Voda, Sr., owner of Voda Petroleum, Inc. was sentenced for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) violations by a U.S. District Judge. Description of Contami nation : Releases from the site have been documented onto adjacent residential property and into a tributary of Campbell's Creek. A review of the facility waste management activity records revealed that Voda Petroleum received, stored and processed waste g asolines, oily wastes, used oil mixed with methyl ethyl ketone, varsol, trichloroethane, toluene, and hexane, crude oil, greases and waxes. In 1996, USEPA contracted an emergency removal of 462 55

- gallon drums of grease or oily wastes; 14 55

- gallon drums o f corrosive wastes; 16 above

ground tanks and associated contaminated soil. Post

- removal analysis of soil samples indicated some contamination remained above health

- based levels. Contaminants include heavy metals and volatile organics. The site did not have a RCRA permit. Sources of Information: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. “Voda Petroleum Inc. (Ultra Oil).” 11 May 2005. 21 January 2006. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/remediation/superfund/state/voda.htmlAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Texas

330 Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. “Community Relations Plan for Voda Petroleum Proposed State Superfund Site Clarksville City, Gregg County, Texas.” January 2001. 21 January 2006. http://w ww.tceq.state.tx.us/assets/public/remediation/superfund/register/pdf0157.pdf

. USEPA. “Site Information: Voda Petroleum.” CERCLIS

. 27 October 2005. 21 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0604923. USEPA. “ Voda Petroleum Inc. Facility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 21 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=1100050 56009 USEPA. “Voda Petroleum Inc.” RCRA Info. (n.d.) 23 October 2006. Additional Contacts: Carol Boucher (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality), (512) 239

- 2501 or (800) 633

- 9363, cboucher@tceq.state.tx.usAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Utah

331 Site Information Site Name: Intermountain Waste Oil Refinery EPA ID No.: UT0001277359 Address: 995 South 500 West, Bountiful, UT 84010 County: Davis NPL Site: Final: 5/11/2000 In CERCLIS Database: 0801545 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Intermountain Waste Oil Refinery occupied 2 acres and operated for about 35 years. Operations ceased in 1993 when the company forfeited its permit to operate. This site, however, was not abandoned because there was still an operator at the time the site ceased operations. Operators re

- refined waste oil on site and sent the product to area cement facilities for use as fuel. Local landfills took the waste sludge that was produced. This site was not RCRA permitted. The selected remedy at this site combines dual phase extraction and groundwater pump and treatment to optimize the cleanup. Additionally, the containers in the garage would be disposed of properly so they do not present a risk in the future. The duration of the cleanup is 4 years. Total capital costs are estimated at $156,400. The total annual treatment system O&M cost for the first year is estimated at $181,200 and for the second year through duration $254,027. The period cost estimate is $18,324. The total estimated worth therefore is $598,200 with the addition of the container disposal, which will add little to the overall cost. Description of Contamination : Contamination at this site likely occurred both before and after 1982. Neighbors associated odors and health problems with the site. Contaminants including solvents were discovered on site and have also contaminated the groundwater beneath the site. EPA removed and disposed of the chemicals in the lab building, various drums and containers, two trailer tanks, and one underground storage tank and its contents. Sources of Information: Llo yd, Lisa (EPA Region 8 RPM), Interview. 7 November 2005. USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Intermountain Waste Oil Refinery.” CERCLIS

. 5 August 2004. 21 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0804587.pdf USEPA. NPL Site Narrative for Intermountain Waste Oil Refinery.” 7 October 2004. 21 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar1579.htm USEPA. “S uperfund Site Progress Profile: Intermountain Waste Oil Refinery .” CERCLIS. 27 October 2005. 21 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0801545 Utah Department of Health under a Cooperative Agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. “Public Health Assessment: Intermountain Waste OilAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Utah

332 Refinery.” 30 September 2003. 21 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/intermountain/int_toc.html. Additional Contacts: Lisa Lloyd (RPM), (303) 312

- 6537Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Utah

333 Site Information Site Name: OMG Air Emissions EPA ID No.: UTD982589848 Address: Shivwits Band of Paiute Tribe Reservation., Mile 15 Highway 91 West, St. George UT 84771 County: Washington NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 0801820 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This metal reclamation facility is an inorganic chemical processing facility which produces cobalt compounds from residues, and byproducts, and cobalt chemicals and tungsten compounds from tungsten carbide scrap including soft scrap and hard scrap. Hard scrap is tungsten carbide that has been formed into tools and other pieces that failed the manufacturer’s quality control tests for shape or siz e or have been broken. Hard scrap may take the form of drill bits, cutting tool inserts, ball bearings, or projectile points. Soft scrap is a wet grinding sludge that is collected from the machining of the hard scrap parts. OMG’s products consisted of c obalt sulfate used in copper mining applications, cobalt carbonate used in animal feeding applications, cobalt nitrate used in the manufacturing of automobile air bags, cobalt oxides used for pigmentation in ceramics and glass, lithium cobalt oxides used i n the manufacture of rechargeable batteries, and tungsten powders used in the manufacturing of hard metals and lighting products. The tungsten process recovered tungsten from secondary raw materials such as tungsten carbide scrap and residues and forms ammonium paratungstate (APT). This reclamation process involved four major steps: 1) raw material drying, crushing and calcining, 2) impurities removal, 3) product recovery and 4) drying and packaging. The cobalt plant produces five different types of cobalt products: cobalt carbonate, cobalt oxide, lithium cobalt dioxide, cobalt nitrate, and cobalt sulfate. Although each product is distinct, the products of one line may be used as feed to another. Further, residue filter cake from the tungsten plant typically contains cobalt values and is used as a feed to the cobalt plant. In November 2002, OMG's corporate headquarters announced its intention to close the facility as part of a major corporate restructuring. The plant ceased operations in December. The company is currently working with the Shivwits Band of Paiute Indians to assist them with finding acceptable alternative uses for the plant site and to implement a site reclamation plan. That plan will include clean closure of the existing wastewater pon ds. The Bureau of Indian Affairs has undertaken further investigation and site cleanup. Description of Contamination: OM Group of Cleveland, Ohio, parent company of OMG Apex Inc., signed an administrative consent order with USEPA's Region 8 office in D enver agreeing to pay $110,000 penalties after dumping 44,000 gallons of chromium

- tainted wastewater. USEPA inspected the OMG facility near St. George, Utah, after the company reported discharging the wastewater into evaporation ponds over a four

- day peri od in August 2002 in violation of RCRA. OMG did not have permits to place the hazardous waste in the ponds. The wastewater contained high levels of chromium. In addition to the penalty, OMG agreed to sample and analyze theAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Utah

334 wastes in the evaporation pond s at the site, which is now closed. The agreement follows a previous settlement reached in August 2001 between OMG and USEPA in which the company agreed to perform nearly $900,000 of environmental work and pay a $125,000 penalty for other hazardous wastes at the same plant site, the agency said. The two cases were unrelated. Sources of Information: EPA Region 8. “Air Pollution Control, Title V Permit to Operate, Statement of Basis for Final Permit No. V

- P

- 0001

- 00.00.” Provided by EPA on 7 December 2005

. EPA Region 8. “EPA, OMG settle hazardous waste case.” 22 April 2003. 26 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r8/r8medi a.nsf/65d6223e10b0ee12872567df0075e965/5804bf94 b97afa8787256d0a00724857!OpenDocument EPA Region 8. “EPA, OMG settle waste case.” 3 August 2001. 26 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r8/r8media.nsf/90a4fc3bc5595fbc872567df0075e923/c883893ac 1b9e8ed87256a9d006b2f41!OpenDocument Johnson, Eric (EPA Region 8) (303) 312

- 6357, Interview. 8 December 2005. USEPA. “OMG Air Emissions.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 21 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0801820 USEPA. “ OMG Americas APEX Operations Facility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 21 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=1100123 57421 USEPA. “Utah metals firm faces waste fine, order.” 8 August 2000. 21 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/d0b2d6dc52c949bb852570d900462aa3?Ope nDocument Additional Contacts: Joyce Ackerman (On

- scene coordinator), (303) 312

- 6822 Luke Chavez (SAM), (303) 312

- 6512 Amy Swanson (EPA), (303) 312

- 6906 Eric R. Johnson (EPA), (303) 312

- 6357 Frank Montarelli (EPA), (303) 312

- 6780 Toll Free (EPA) 1

- 800

- 227

- 8917 Kathleen Paser (EPA Air Programs Department), (303) 312

- 6526 Eric Johnson (RCRA Enforcement), (303) 312

- 6357Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Utah

335 Site Information: Site Name: Petrochem Recycli ng Corp./Ekotek Plant EPA ID No.: UTD093119196 Address: 1628 N Chicago St., Salt Lake City, UT 84116 County: Salt Lake NPL Site: Deleted: 6/30/2003 In CERCLIS Database: 0800649 Site History and/or Description of Recycling Operation: This Superfund site is located in the northern section of Salt Lake City. It was originally owned and operated as an oil refinery by O.C. Allen Oil Company from 1953 to 1968. In 1968, Flinco, Inc. purchased the facility and operated the refinery until 1978. During that time, Flinco changed its name to Bonus International Corp. In 1978, Axel Johnson, Inc. acquired the facility and operated it through its Delaware

- based subsidiary, Ekotek, Inc. This subsidiary converted the site into a hazardous waste storage, treatment, and petrochemical recycling facility. In 1981, the facility changed ownership but retained the name Ekotek, Inc., based in Utah. Ekotek declared bankruptcy in November 1987. Petrochem Recycling Corp. leased the facility in 1987 from Ekotek and continued operations until February 1988. The facility received a final RCRA permit in July 1987, which expired in July 1989. The Ekotek bankruptcy estate remains the current site owner. The facility was permitted to manage hazardous wastes, though the nature and extent of the petrochemical recycling operation is not known. After operations ceased at this facility ownership was unknown. Cleanup expenditure spent on this site in 2004 equaled $4,032,359.38. Description of Contamination: Contamin ants associated with on

- site sources include a wide range of organic substances such as chlorinated solvents and other volatile organic compounds, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, phthalates, pesticides, Aroclor 1260, dioxin and furans, and heavy metals. An emergency surface removal addressed 1,200 drums and 1,500 smaller containers, three surface impoundments, an underground drain field, numerous piles and pits of waste materials, underground tanks, incineration furnaces, and contaminated soils. It is unknown from which phase of the operation the contamination occurred. Sources of Information: EPA Region 8. “Petrochem Recycling Corporation/Ekotek Plant.” May 2003. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region8/superfund/sites/ut/pchem.html

. USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Petrochem Recycling Corp./Ekotek Plant .” 27 September 1996. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0896901.pdf

. USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Utah

336 USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Petrochem Recycling Corporation/Ekotek Plant.” 7 October 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar1315.htm

. USEPA. “Permit Series List.” RCRAInfo . 19 January 2006. USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Petrochem Recycling Corp./Ekotek Plant .” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 17 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0800649 White, Jack (EPA Region 8), 303

- 312

- 6707, Interview. 12/8/2005. Additional Contacts: Rebecca Thomas (USEPA), (303) 312

- 6552 Jack White (USEPA), (303) 312

- 6707Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Virginia

337 Site Information Site Name: Bingham & Taylor EPA ID No.: VAD003064490 Address: Nalle Place, Culpeper, VA 22 701 County: Culpeper NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Bingham and Taylor produces cast iron products from recycled scrap iron in a legitimate, regulated, recycling practice. The site cons ists of office buildings, operating buildings, storage buildings, and a loading dock. Bingham & Taylor receives scrap iron from various sources. The scrap iron is melted down and transferred to molds to produce cast iron products. Products include valve boxes, curb boxes, meter frames, and lids. Bingham & Taylor finishes its cast iron products with an asphalt coating. It does not appear the facility was RCRA

- permitted. Description of Contamination : Waste products from scrap iron recycling operations at Bingham & Taylor include cupola dust, cupola slag, and spent casting sand. The cupola dust emissions are considered hazardous and were mixed with other waste for stabilization and disposal. In 1986, Bingham & Taylor ceased on

- site waste disposal. Between 1999 and 2002, EPA and Bingham & Taylor found elevated levels of lead in on

- site surface soil. Subsurface soil, groundwater, and off

- site soil did not contain lead levels high enough to cause concern. Corrective action onsite included capping of 30, 000 square

- feet of contaminated soil with an impervious, bituminous asphalt cover. The site has been capped and, according to a rough estimate from Denis Zielinski, EPA Region 3 project manager, remediation costs were approximately $500,000. Sources of Information: EPA Region 3. “Bingham & Taylor Facility, Culpeper, Virginia: Notice of Intent to Issue a Final Decision under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 and Opportunity for a Public Heari ng.” 27 October 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/publicnoticebinghamtaylor.htm

. EPA Region 3. “Bingham & Taylor facility, Culpeper, Virginia Statement of Basi s.” 22 November 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/publicnoticebinghamtaylorsob.htm

. EPA Region 3. “Mid

- Atlantic Facility Lead Program Participating Faciliti es.” 6 September 2005. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/ca/fl_sites.htm

. EPA Region 3. “Region 3 GPRA Baseline RCRA Corrective Action Facility: Bingham & Taylor.” 23 December 2004. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/ca/va/pdf/vad003064490.pdf USEPA. “Permit Series List.” RCRAInfo . 19 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Virginia

338 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Bingham and Taylor.” 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=VAD003064490 Zielinski, Denis M. (Project Manager), (215) 814

- 3431, Interview. 16 November 2005. Additional Contacts: Denis M. Zielinski (EPA Region 3 Project Manager), (215) 814

- 3431, zielinski.denis@epa.gov Maria Williams (VA DEQ), (8 04) 698

- 4211, mswilliams@deq.virginia.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Virginia

339 Site Information Site Name: Old Salem Tannery II EPA ID No.: VAD988170437 Address: 120 S. Bruffey Street, Salem, VA 24153 County: Salem NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 303837 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The Old Salem Tannery Site was a tannery in operation from the late 1891 until 1973. From 1973 until 1993, the land was used as an industrial storage facility and a lead reclamation operation. Until 1991, the current owner of the property operated on site an industrial salvage facility engaged in the reclamation of lead from the splitting of batteries. Since the mid 1990s, the property has been used as a truck and vehicle salvag e yard. Description of Contamination : There are approximately 100 drums and containers on site. On January 14, 1992, a site assessment was conducted to determine the extent of possible contamination on and off site. Twelve samples were collected from the site, which included two soil samples from near the former battery breaking site. Analytical results show that several soil samples had elevated levels of lead and samples from a lagoon area had elevated levels of chromium. In 1993, USEPA Region 3 Remo val Program performed a removal action at the site, which included the removal of drums and containers of hazardous waste. In April of 2004, USEPA was again contacted regarding the Site. Sources of Information : EPA Region 3. Memorandum from Terry Stilm an, OSC, EPA Region III to Charles Walters, Public Health Advisor, ATSDR EPA Region III. “Old Salem Tannery Site.” 27 February 1992. 17 January 2006. http://loggerhead.epa.gov/arweb/pdf/154 671.pdf USEPA. “Old Salem Tannery.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0303837

. USEPA. “Old Salem Tannery.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=1100093 15963

. USEPA. “Old Salem Tannery II.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile . (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://www.epaosc.net/site_profile.asp?site_id=809 Additional Contacts : Christine Wagner, wagner.christine@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Virginia

340 Site Information Site Name: Safety

- Kleen Systems, Inc. EPA ID No.: VAD981043011 Address: Chester Service Center, 1200 W. Hundred Road, Chester, VA 23831 County: Chesterfield NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The site was purchased from a petroleum supplier in the 1980s. Since then, Safety

- Kleen in Chester, VA has distributed, collected, and reclaimed solvents in a le gitimate, regulated, solvent recycling facility. Customers include automotive repair shops, industrial maintenance facilities, photo processors, and dry cleaners. The 9

- acre Safety

- Kleen site is 1.5 miles south of the James River and bordered by a general business zone and private residences. The facility is still in operation. RCRA permits were issued December 1990, August 1996, and September 2002. Contamination most likely occurred during 1980s before the site had a RCRA Part B Permit. Descriptio n of Contamination : Contamination stemming from Safety

- Kleen activities includes mineral spirits in soils and sub

- soils, and 1,1

- dichloroethene, and tetrachloroethene in groundwater. In 1998, Safety

- Kleen connected a neighboring private home to the publi c water supply. Safety

- Kleen continues to monitor groundwater contamination, and groundwater sampling has shown a downward trend in contamination. Sources of Information: EPA Region 3. “Region 3 GPRA Baseline RCRA Corrective Action Facility: Bingham & Taylor.” 1 July 2005. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3wcmd/ca/va/pdf/vad981043011.pdf Jacobi, Mik (Region 3), (215) 814

- 3435, Interview. 7 November 2005. USEPA. “Permit Series List.” RCRAInfo . 19 January 2006. USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Safety Kleen Systems, Inc.” 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=VAD981043011 USEPA. “Safety Kleen Systems 315401.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list_tri?tri_fac_id=23831SFTYK1200W Addition al Contacts: Kurt Stafford (VADEQ), (804) 698

- 4005, kastafford@deq.virginia.gov Mik Jacobi (EPA Region 3), (215) 814

- 3435, jacobi.mike@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

341 Site Information Site Name: Bay Zinc Company Inc. PA ID No.: WAD027530526 Address: 301 W. Charron Rd., Moxee City, WA 98936 County: Yakima NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Bay Zinc has secondary manufactured zinc micronutrient fertilizer for over 25 years on their 11

- acre site. The raw materials used in the manufacturing processes were K061 electric arc furnace dust that is rich in zinc and other metals. The K061 dust was typically reacted with sulfuric acid. The final product was dried into granules or retained in liquid form, then sold as zinc micronutrient fertilizer for agricultural use. This facility had a RCRA storage permit for K061 prior to recycling. The facility had a RCRA permit from Novemb er 1988 to November 1990. The site was addressed through MTCA, Washington State’s superfund, even though they had a RCRA storage permit. Description of Contamination: Product storage, handling practices, and product spills at the facility have resulte d in releases of hazardous substances to the soil and groundwater. In soil, metals such as lead, cadmium, and zinc are the primary concern. Groundwater samples show elevated concentrations of sulfate, chloride, manganese, cadmium and zinc. The selected cl eanup actions for the site include excavation and off

- site disposal of contaminated soils to an appropriate landfill and removal and treatment of contaminated groundwater. Sources of Information: Boyd, Andrew. Email to Amy Lile (USEPA Office of Solid Was te). 21 October 2005. Information from Washington Department of Ecology’s report to the state legislature in 2002: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0204028.html USEPA. “Bay Zinc Company Incorporate d.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 17 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000491254

. USEPA. “Permit Series List.” RCRAInfo . 19 January 2006. USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile: Bay Zinc Co Inc.” 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=WAD027530526

. Washington State Department of Ecology. “Fact Sheet September 2002: Bay Zinc Company Inc.” September 2002. 17 January 2006. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0209058.pdf

. Washington State Department of Ecology. “Hazardous Waste Management Facilities in Washington

– Problems and Options.” p. 12, 69. September 2002. 17 January 2006. http://www.ec y.wa.gov/biblio/0204028.html

.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

342 Washington State Department of Ecology. “Bay Zinc Co Inc.” (n.d.) 23 October 2006. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/facilitysitesearch/FSDetailReport.aspx?id=17964725 Additional Contacts: Greg Caron (Hazardous Waste Program, Washington State Department of Ecology), (509) 454

- 7893, grca461@ecy.wa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

343 Site Information Site Name: Beacon Battery Co. EPA ID No.: Address: 8666 Delta Line Rd., Custer, WA 98240 County: Whatcom NPL S ite: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Beacon Battery is a small home business located in Custer, Washington, in northwest Whatcom County. Beacon Battery receives used batteries for recycle and resale. The business collects lead acid batteries and reconditions them on site. The batteries that cannot be reconditioned are sent for off

- site smelting. It appears to be a legitimate recycling process. Description of Contamination : In 1990, an investigation found that approximately 200 batteries were being stacked outside in an open area. There was evidence of spillage of battery acid. Soil samples indicated lead contamination. In 1999, a second investigation showed elevated levels of lead in the soil; how ever, there was no longer evidence of acid spillage. In 2000, the site was cleaned. Drinking water tests showed the water was safe and the contaminated soil was removed. Two hazardous waste inspections were conducted at the site in 2003. Minor hazardous waste violations were noted, and the facility corrected everything in a timely manner. Sources of Information : EPA Region 10. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 20 November 2005. Washington Department of Ecology. “Beacon Battery.” (n.d.) 23 October 2006. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/facilitysitesearch/FSDetailReport.aspx?id=2900 Washington State Department of Health. “Health Consultation: Beacon Battery, Custer, Whatcom County, Washington.” 19 September 2003. 17 January 2006. http://www.doh.wa.gov/ehp/oehas/publications_pdf/HealthConsults/ Beacon_Battery_Custer_Whatcom_6

- 28

- 01.pdf. Additional Contacts: David S. Misko (Hazardous Waste Compliance, Supervisor, Washington Dept. of Ecology

– Northwest Regional Office), (425) 649

- 7014Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

344 Site Information Site Name: CleanCare Corporation EPA ID No.: WASFN1002182 Address: 1510 Taylor Way, Tacoma, WA 98421

- 4127 County: Pierce NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 1002182 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: This site has been an industrial site since 1926. There have been several owner s of the property who have used the site for disposal of chemical wastes, auto fluff (shredded pieces of automobile parts), and sludge. In 1975, a small tank farm was built on the property, and it became a chemical and petroleum recycling facility in the l ate 1970s. The facility, known as the Poligen plant, was owned by Mr. Glenn Tegen, also owner of Lilyblad Petroleum, an oil re

- refining facility. From 1974 until its abandonment in 1999, businesses under several different names, including CleanCare, operated the site as a chemical, solvent, and petroleum recycling facility. The site was an interim status treatment, storage, disposal, (TSD) and recycling facility for off

- site generated hazardous and non

hazardous wastes. When CleanCare was in operation, i ts function was to solidify oily sludge wastes originating from catch basins, sumps, and storm drains; recycle waste oils, antifreeze, and spent solvents; and crush used oil filters for off

- site recycling by other facilities. CleanCare also received hazardous and Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE)

- regulated dangerous waste. This waste was stored for transport to another TSD facility for final treatment and/or disposal, or was blended into hazardous waste fuel. Solvent was received and recycled as part of a parts

- washer program marketed to generators. CleanCare picked up the spent solvent and replaced it with recycled stock. CleanCare also received “paint gun wash,” solvent that was generally of low quality, routinely used to clean paint spray guns. This waste was sent to Sol Pro, an adjacent but separate TSD/recycling facility, for recycling and then returned to customers. Additionally, CleanCare recycled antifreeze in a dedicated distillation column. A separate distillation column, called the “Spli tter,” along with other processing equipment, recovered oil from oily waste and prepared it for used oil fuel blending. In 1992, CleanCare began the process of obtaining a final permit to operate a treatment, storage, and disposal and recycling facility under RCRA. The final application was submitted to WDOE in 1994. From 1994

- 1999, Ecology sent letters to CleanCare notifying them that its permit application contained serious problems that prevented WDOE from approving the final application. Over the years, some of the companies operating at the site have had serious problems with the handling and disposal of hazardous waste. When the facility was in operation its major function was to solidify oily sludge wastes originating from catch basins, sumps, and storm drains; recycle waste oils, antifreeze, and spent solvents; and crush oil filters for off

- site recycling by other facilities. The CleanCare facility has four separate tank farms, two hazardous/dangerous waste container storage pads, and a proces sing area where the distillation of solvent, oil, and antifreeze occurred.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

345 The most recent damage occurred on March 26, 1999. Approximately l,000 to 2,000 gallons of oily waste spilled into the on

- site storm drains. The wastes flowed off site into the Lincoln Avenue ditch and followed the storm drain into the Blair Waterway. To prevent further off

- site releases, the storm drains were blocked off. WDOE inspected the site several times during 1998 and 1999 and found many violations. In July 1999, WDOE iss ued a $486,000 penalty against CleanCare. In August 1999, CleanCare advised WDOE that it would close the business and the site stopped taking some waste material. On November 17, 1999, CleanCare closed its doors. CleanCare is providing site access and historical knowledge of site activities to USEPA to help with the current response actions at the site. In 2000, estimated costs were as follows: USEPA $234,100; START $563,700; ERRS $3,224,402; and Coast Guard $123,800, totaling $4,146,002. In September 2 000, CleanCare completed its removal action. The total cost of the removal in 2000 was $4.3 million. CleanCare had $23,000 (of a total $83,000 requirement) set aside in a trust fund to meet its financial assurance requirements for closure. WDOE provided $130,000 in the form of a remedial action grant and for one

- time costs related to electrical and security problems at the site. WDOE also continues to pay the monthly utility bills at the site, which range from $600 to $900 per month. Future costs associated with any further cleanup actions are unknown. Description of Contamination: Water samples taken in 1999 showed the presence of low levels of metal, semivolatiles, and volatile constituents. Results for non

- contact storm water were below draft noncontact storm water discharge limits. Surface soil sample results indicated the presence of arsenic, BTEX constituents, and polyaromatic constituents at concentrations above USEPA Region 10 risk

- based screening preliminary remediation goals and WDOE’s MTCA Meth od A cleanup values. In 1999, USEPA conducted an assessment of the site to document conditions that may pose a threat to human health and the environment. Over 1.6 million gallons of chemicals and other hazardous wastes were being stored in tanks, storage containers, and drums at the 5

- acre site. The containers were in poor condition and posed a potential threat if they should break or leak. The chemicals and wastes identified included regulated hazardous wastes, used oil, antifreeze, used solvents, paint wastes, and crushed oil filters. If any of the contamination moved off site, it could easily get into the Blair or Hylebos Waterways. Since December 1999, USEPA removed close to 2 million gallons of waste from the site. The wastes were stored in 3,630 co ntainers, 33 aboveground storage tanks, and 19 temporary aboveground storage tanks. In addition, USEPA demolished four above ground storage tanks and installed an asphalt cap on three areas of the site covering more than 26,000 square feet. Because the site’s stormwater system was broken and contaminated, USEPA installed an aboveground stormwater management system. WDOE has agreed to take over the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

346 Sources of Information: Boyd, Andrew. Email to Amy Lile (USEPA Office of Solid Waste). 21 October 2005. Information from Washington Department of Ecology’s report to the state legislature in 2002: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0204028.html EPA Region 10

- Emergency Response Unit. “EPA Pollution Report: Clean Care Removal Site (CleanCare, Tacoma, Washington.” 13 October 2000. 15 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/R10/CLEANUP.NSF/9f3c21896330b4898825687b007a0f33/41a cf49d06cb975a88256856005e40f2/$FILE/POLREP37FINAL.pdf EPA Region 10

- Action Memorandum. “Request for a Removal Action, a Ceiling Increase, a $2 Million Exemption, a 12

- Month Exemption, and a Change of Scope at the CleanCare Site, Tacoma, Pierce County, Washington; Site ID #6W.” 5 January 2000. 15 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/R10/CLEANUP.NSF/6ea33b02338c3a5e882567ca005d382f/41a cf49d06cb975a88256856005e40f2/$FILE/actmem0105.pdf USEPA. “CleanCare.” CERCLIS . 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006

. http://cfpub1.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=1002182 USEPA. “CleanCare.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 15 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000620579 USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for CleanCare Corp.” 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=WAD980738512 USEPA. “Superfund Fact Sheet: CleanCare.” January 2000. 15 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/R10/CLEANUP.NSF/6ea33b02338c3a5e88 2567ca005d382f/41a cf49d06cb975a88256856005e40f2/$FILE/cleanca.PDF USEPA. “Superfund Fact Sheet: CleanCare.” December 2000. 15 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/R10/CLEANUP.NSF/9f3c21896330b4898825687b007a0f33/41a cf49d06cb975a88256856005e40f2/$FILE/1100cleancare+Final.pdf Washington State Department of Ecology. Prepared by Ross & Associates Environmental Environmental Consulting, LTD. “Analysis of Cleanup Obligations and Costs for Hazardous Waste Management Facilities in Washington State

– Final Report.” 29 January 2003. 15 January 2006. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0304011.pdf Additional Contacts: Kerry Graber (Washington Department of Ecology Hazardous Waste/Regulatory), (360) 407

- 0241Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

347 Site Information Site Name: Dyno Battery Co. EPA ID No.: WAH000003996 Address: 4248 23 rd Ave W, Se attle, WA 98199 County: King NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Dyno Battery is a lead acid battery recycler. The facility melts lead, casts lead grids, pastes lead grids with lead monoxide, and places grids with acid into battery casings. The recycling/reclamation of damaged lead grids, pasted lead grids, baghouse dust, lead dross, and floor sweepings is viewed as legitimate recycling. Damaged grids with lead monoxide paste (scrap metal) are sent to RSR in Los Angeles. Dross (byproduct) and baghouse dust (characteristic sludge) are shipped to Metalex in British Columbia. Description of Contamination : The site was investigated in 1998. The soil in the stormwater swale behind the facility is contaminated (1.2 percent total lead). The source of the contamination appears to be poor housekeeping and storage practices. Fork lifts track dust and debris from inside the facility into the alley, where it is washed into the swale. Large commercial fishing boat batteries and smaller batteries in poor condition are stored in the alley. Pallets used to ship batteries are also stored in the alley. These pallets show evidence of acid stains. Sources of Information: Boyd, Andrew. Email to Amy Lile (USEPA Office of Solid Waste). December 2005. Information from Washington Department of Ecology’s report to the state legislature in 2002: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0204028.html EPA Region 1 0. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 20 November 2005. USEPA. “Dyno Battery Incorporated.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 25 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000489846 Washington Department of Ecology. “Dyno Battery Co.” (n.d.) 23 October 2006. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/facilitysitesearch/FSDetailReport.aspx?id=72957545 Additional Contacts: David S. Misko (Hazardous Waste Compliance, Supervisor, Washington Department of Ecology

– Northwest Regional Office), (425) 649

- 7014Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

348 Site Info rmation Site Name: Emerald Recycling EPA ID No.: WAD058367152 Address: 1500 Airport Way S, Seattle, WA 98134 County: King NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Emerald Recycling is involved with us ed oil recycling (crank case, diesel, bunker C, gasoline), solvent recycling, and ethylene glycol recycling/distillation and redistribution. In the late 1970s, a tank cleaning company (Northwest Tank Service) processed used oil and oily waste at the site. From the early 1980s until 1995, a hazardous waste management company, Northwest EnviroServices, operated under interim status, pending approval of the Part B. From 1995 to 1999, Northwest Tank Service again used the site for used oil processing until Emerald Petroleum, now Emerald Recycling, began operations in 1999. Currently Emerald Recycling, Inc. utilizes the site for used oil recycling. Oil and gasoline filters are drained and crushed on site, and the metal is sent off site for metals reclamatio n at Nucor Steel. Antifreeze and solvent reclamation activities do not take place at this facility but drummed wastes may be held at the 10

- day transfer facility before shipment off site to the final reclamation facility. Description of Contamination : S ite contamination was discovered in 1988 after the installation of eleven groundwater monitoring wells. The groundwater was contaminated with benzene, arsenic, and lead. Subsoil on site was also contaminated with arsenic, lead, and benzopyrene. Analytic al results from these wells show the contamination levels have remained stable over the years and annual sampling is ongoing. Northwest EnviroService continues to oversee the closure of the facility per the agreement and requirements of the Part B permit. There has been one formal enforcement action with penalty issued to Emerald Recycling in the past 5 years. This action was the result of Emerald's failure to follow proper check

- in procedures, which resulted in a high concentration of PCB oil. Sources of Information : EPA Region 10. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 20 November 2005. USEPA. “Enforcement and Compliance History Online: Detailed Facility Report.” October

– December 2005. 17 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/cgi

- bin/get1cReport.cgi USEPA. “RCRA Corrective Action Site Progress Profile for Emerald Recycling.” 6 June 2006. 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/rcra_profile.getmain?p_handler_id=WAD058367152 Washington State Department of Ecology. “Information from Toxic Cleanup Sites Program Documentation of Environmental Indicator Determin ation.” March 2003. 17 January 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/cleanup.nsf/0/Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

349 cc222b8059fa7b3488256e0100668a31/$FILE/WA7152.pdf Washington Department of Ecology. “Facility Site Detail: Northwest EnviroService.” (n.d.) 23 October 2006. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/facilitysitesearch/FSDetailReport.aspx?id=12532447 Additional Contacts : Trudy Harding (Hazardous Waste Inspector, Washington Department of Ecology

- NWRO), (425) 649

- 7289Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

350 Site Information Site Name: Hand in Hand Recycling EPA ID No.: Address: 206 E Floral, Centralia, WA 98531 County: Lewis NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Hand in Hand Recycling recycles circuit boards and scrap metals such as aluminum. Description of Contamination : An initial investigation was done September through November of 2002. It was listed on Wa shington’s hazardous site listing in July 2003. The soil is contaminated and it is suspected that the water is contaminated. Sources of Information : Thurston County. “Home Waste

- Not Guide.” 2004

- 2005. 10 October 2006. http://www.co.thurston.wa.us/ww m/Recycling/WASTE%20GUIDE%2004%20WEB.pdf #search=%22%22hand%20in%20hand%20recycling%22%20soil%22. Thurston County Department of Water and Waste Management. “Where Should I Recycle My....?” 9 January 2006. 17 January 2006. http://www.co.thurston.wa.us/wwm/Recycling/where_A_B.htm Washington State Department of Ecology. Toxics Cleanup Program. “Integrated Site Information System: Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Site Lists.” 5 October 2006. 10 October 2006. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/tcp/cscs/CSCSpage.HTM Western Electronic Product Stewardship Initiative. “Recycle Your Computer: Washington .” 2001. 17 January 2006. http://www.recyclingadvocates.org/wepsi/wa

- business.htm

.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

351 Site Information Site Name: Island Recycling EPA ID No.: Address: 20014 Hwy 525, Freeland, WA 98249 County: Island NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site His tory and Description of Recycling Operation : Island Recycling recycles personal computers, circuit boards, peripherals, faxes, and televisions. Description of Contamination : An initial investigation was done in March of 2003. The soil and surface are contaminated, and it is suspected that the drinking water and groundwater may also be contaminated. Sources of Information : Washington State Department of Ecology. Toxics Cleanup Program. “Integrated Site Information System: Confirmed and Suspected Co ntaminated Site Lists.” 5 October 2006. 10 October 2006. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/tcp/cscs/CSCSpage.HTM Western Electronic Product Stewardship Initiative. “Recycle Your Comp uter: Washington.” 2001. 17 January 2006. http://www.recyclingadvocates.org/wepsi/wa

- business.htm

.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

352 Site Information Site Name: Maralco EPA ID No.: WAD053825352 A ddress: 7730 S. 202 nd , Kent, WA 98032 County: King NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: Maralco operated an aluminum recycling/refinery business at the site from 1980 to 1986. The site filed for b ankruptcy in 1983 and has not been cleaned up since. Aluminum alloy ingots from aluminum cans and other aluminum metal scrap were produced at the site. The aluminum scrap was melted and processed in rotary barrel and reverberatory furnaces. The rotary barrel furnace was charged with salt to act as a flux to remove impurities and prevent oxidation of the aluminum. The salt and impurities separated from the aluminum, resulting in a waste black dross that was stored in a waste pile on

- site. There are presently about 20,000 cubic yards in the pile. Wastes produced included black dross, furnace slag, and baghouse dust, most of which were stored on site. Although the technology used for recycling was considered old even at the time they started business, it w as considered a legitimate recycling process. The dross designated as hazardous waste in Washington was state

- only hazardous waste due to the salts, which are toxic to rats, and copper, which is toxic to fish. The waste pile has yet to be fully characterized and portions of the pile may need to be disposed as hazardous waste. A developer is currently sampling the site to characterize the waste and, depending on the results, may conduct the cleanup in order to purchase the property. Description of Contamination: Groundwater, surface water, sediment, and soil all have confirmed priority pollutant metal contamination. Sources of Information: EPA Region 10. Email Correspondence to Amy Lile (EPA Office of Solid Waste). 20 November 2005.
MK

- Environmental Services. “Phase 1 Remedial Investigation Report.” February 1991. USEPA. “Safety Kleen Systems 315401 Facility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 18 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=1100053 22310 Washington Department of Ecology. “Facility/Site Detail: Maralco” (n.d.). 23 October 2006. http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/fs/detail.asp?FS_ID=2067 Additional Contacts: Norm Peck (Toxics Cl eanup Program, Washington Department of Ecology), (425) 649

- 7047Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

353 Site Information: Site Name: Nooksack Valley Disposal EPA ID No.: WAD057315624 Address: 250 Birch Bay

- Lynden Rd., Lynden, WA 98264 County: Whatcom NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Nooksack Valley Disposal recycles paint, paint thinner, solvents, pesticides, fuels, engine oil, car batteries, and cleaners. Nooksack Valley Disposal & Recycling services over 8,000 county customers, including the cities of Lynden, Everson, Nooksack, and Sumas. Description of Contamination : The site was listed on Washington’s Hazardous Site Listing in February 2001 and initially investigated in July 2000. The soil on site is contaminated and i t is suspected that ground and surface water are also contaminated. Sources of Information : Nooksack Valley Disposal and Recycling, Inc. Hazardous Waste. 2006. 18 January 2006. http://www.nvd

- inc.com/hazwaste.htm USEPA. “Nooksack Valley Disposal Fac ility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse

. (n.d.). 23 October 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_regi stry_id=1100053 22953 Washington Department of Ecology. “Facility Site Detail: Lynden Recycling Center S4610.” (n.d.) 23 October 2006. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/facilitysitesearch/FSDetailReport.aspx?id=2875Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

354 Site Information Site Name: Northwest Transformer (Mission/Pole) EPA ID No.: WAD980833974 Address: 6882 Mission St., Everson, WA 98247 County: Whatcom NPL Site: Deleted 9/28/1999 In CERCLIS Database: 1001003 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: The Northwest Transformer (Mission/Pole) salvage yard covers 1.6 acres. The property was agricultural farmland until 1958, when the Northwest Transformer Service Company began leasing the site. From 1958 to 1985, the company used the site as a salvage yard and stored, repaired, and recycled electrical transformers and capacitors on site. They also carried out other activities on site, including dismantling and reclaiming equipment; burning casings for transformers in an open concrete burn pit; burning waste oils in a space heater; and draining transformer oils into a seepage pit. Chemicals including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) spilled and leaked into site soil. Waste transformer fluids were stored in an on

- site tank. Description of Contamination: Soil was contaminated with PCBs and small quantities of solvents. The highest concentration was 31,000 parts per million (ppm). In May 1985, EPA used CERCLA emergency funds to remove PCB

- contaminated materials from the site. Five transformers containing greater than 500 ppm were drained and cleaned. About 500 transformers were either clean (less than 46 ppm), and those that contained 46 to 500 ppm were drained, rinsed, and cleaned on

- site. Contaminated soil (1,360 cubic yards) and waste liquid (5,500 gallons) containing 10 ppm or more were also removed. Sources of Information: USEPA. “EPA Superfund Explanation of Significant Differences: Northwest Transformer.” 22 December 1993. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/e1094102.pdf USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision Amendment: Northwest Transformer.” 30 September 1991. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/a1091031.pdf USEPA. “EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Northwest Transformer.” 15 September 1989. 19 February 2006. http://www.ep a.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r1089018.pdf USEPA. “Federal Register Notice

– Notice of deletion of the Lackawanna Refuse Superfund Site from the National Priorities List (NPL).” 28 September 1999. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/d990928.htm USEPA. “Five Year Review Northwest Transformer.” July 1999. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa. gov/superfund/sites/fiveyear/f99

- 10003.pdfAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

355 USEPA. “NPL Fact Sheet Northwest Transformer (Mission Pole).” April 2002. 19 February 2006. http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/nplpad.nsf/epaid/wad980833974 USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Northwest Transformer.” 10 June 1986. 19 February 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/nplsnl/n1001003.pdf USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile: Northwest Transformer.” CERCLIS. 11 September 2006. 23 October 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=1001003 Additional Contacts: Tim Brincefield (Site Manager), (202) 553

- 2100 brincefield.timothy@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

356 Site Information Site Name: Reflex Recycling EPA ID No.: WAD980978142 Address: 2432 E 11 th St, Tacoma, WA County: Pi erce NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: No Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : Reflex Recycling stored and recycled hazardous waste in the printing industry. It shut down in 2000 after breaking more than 50 environmental regulations. The Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) spent approximately $150,000 for emergency removal and disposal of nearly 250 drums of oily waste. The site is currently fenced and secure, but has not yet gone through proper investigation and cleanup. There w as no approved financial instrument in place to fund closure costs. A letter from a consultant to Ecology estimated closure costs at $103,000, but provided no basis for the estimate. Description of Contamination : Drums containing unidentifiable waste so lutions containing benzene and tetrachloroethylene were found on site, as well as waste stored on a cracked floor. In 2001, 32,000 gallons of hazardous waste were removed from the site. In March 2001, it was confirmed that the on

- site groundwater contain ed small amounts of hexavalent chromium. In 2005, Reflex Recycling was removed from Washington’s Hazardous Sites List. Sources of Information: Boyd, Andrew. Email to Amy Lile (USEPA Office of Solid Waste). 21 October 2005. Information from Washington Department of Ecology’s report to the state legislature in 2002: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0204028.html USEPA. “Reflex Recycling Corporation Multisystem Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 18 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110000702455 Washington Department of Ecology, “Analysis of Cleanup Obligations and Costs for Hazardous Waste Management Facilities in Washington State

- Final Report.” 29 January 2003. 18 January 2006. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0304011.pdf

. Washington Department of Ecology. “Washington’s Hazardous Sites List.” 23 February 2005. 18 January 2006. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0509041d.pdf

. Washington Department of Ecology. “Ecology removes tons of hazardous waste in Tacoma, Vancouver.” 29 May 2001. 18 J anuary 2006. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/news/2001news/2001

- 091.html. Washington Department of Ecology. “Facility Site Detail: Reflex Recycling.” (n.d.) 23 October 2006. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/facilitysitesearch/FSDetailReport.aspx?id=20647549Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

357 Washi ngton Department of Ecology. “Reflex Recycling Corporation fined $20,000 for Improperly Handling Waste.” 21 March 2000. 18 January 2006. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/news/2000news/2000

- 044.html

. Additional Contacts: Sandy Howard (Washington Department of Ecology), (360) 407

- 6239 Kerri Graber (Washington Department of Ecology), (360) 407

- 0241, kgra461@ecy.wa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

358 Site Information Site Name: SafCo Enviro nmental EPA ID No.: WAD981766884 Address: 1255 South 188 th St., SeaTac, WA 98148 County: King NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: Archived Site History and Description of Recycling Operation: SafCo was illegally operating as a hazardous waste recyclin g and transportation facility that primarily handled waste oil and printing wastes. It was closed by the local fire department because it was a potential fire hazard following a substantial spill of oily waste in 1992. Washington Department of Ecology (Ec ology) issued an emergency enforcement order directing that all materials, including 55 damaged or leaking drums containing oil and other wastes, be legally removed and disposed of. Other actions required by the order included the separation of incompatibl es, identification of the contents of damaged drums, and the disposal of toxic wastes. Eventually, a second order was issued for the removal of an additional 445 drums containing oil and other wastes. There were neither any financial assurance mechanism nor any source of funds from the owner/operator. A group of 31 potentially liable parties (PLPs) managed the removal and disposal. Best cost estimates received from representatives of the PLP group put the costs between $500,000 and $750,000, but no one could provide exact data due to the age of this case. The leads for the group represented the one or two largest companies associated with it. Thirteen smaller generators eventually paid $200,000 to the lead companies for their share. Both attorneys said cleanup costs were most likely paid for from operating revenues. All materials were properly inventoried, analyzed, and disposed of. The site is currently vacant and secured. There is no remaining cleanup to be done, except what might be necessary on a voluntary basis in order to sell the property. Description of Contamination: In 1992, there was a substantial spill of oily waste. However, the extent of contamination from this spill is unclear. Sources of Information: Boyd, Andrew. Email to Amy Lile (USEPA Office of Solid Waste). 21 October 2005. Information from Washington Department of Ecology's report to the state legislature in 2002: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0204028.html USEPA. “Safco Environmental Safco Corp Multisystem Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse

. (n.d.). 18 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/ multisys2.get_list?facility_uin=110005341914. USEPA. “Safco Environmental Safco Corp Facility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse . (n.d.). 18 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/ fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?pgm_sys_id_in=WAD981766884&pgm_sys_acrnm _in=RCRAINFOAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Washington

359 Washington State Department of Ecology. “ Analysis of Cleanup Obligations and Costs for Hazardous Waste Management Facilities in Washington State

- Final Report.” 29 January 2003. 18 January 2006. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0304011.pdf

. Washington Department of Ecology. “Facility Site Detail: SafCo.” (n.d.) 23 October 2006. https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/facilitysitesearch/FSDetailReport.aspx?id=2428Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling West Virginia

360 Site Information Site Name: Red Jacket Salvage Yard EPA ID No.: WVN000306116 Addre ss: Mitchell Branch Rd., Red Jacket, WV 25692 County: Mingo NPL Site: No In CERCLIS Database: 306116 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : The abandoned 4

- acre salvage yard was previously named Lacy’s Salvage Yard and contains an ash pi le from previous smelter operations. The site contains two small ash piles that cover about 10 feet by 4 feet in total area. The ash was created from a small aluminum smelter that operated at this site. The smelter was used to separate and collect aluminum from items such as old car parts. The concrete pad from the smelter remains at the site. One of the ash piles is on the concrete pad and the other is inside an old truck bed. Description of Contamination: The ash pile contains elevated levels of lead, which were at risk of migrating into the adjacent soil and local waterways. Twenty

- two tons of lead

- affected ash and soil were transported to a hazardous waste landfill in 2004. Sources of Information: US Department of Health and Human Services. “Health Consultation: Incidental Ingestion Exposures to Chemicals from a Smelter: Red Jacket Salvage Yard Site A/K/A Lacy’s Salvage Yard.” 4 April 2005. 18 January 2006. http://www.atsdr.cdc .gov/HAC/PHA/RedJacketSalvageYd/ RedJacketHC040405.pdf USEPA. “Red Jacket Salvage Yard.” CERCLIS . 27 October 2005. 18 January 2006. http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/c sitinfo.cfm?id=0306116

. USEPA. “Red Jacket Salvage Yard Facility Detail Report.” Envirofacts Data Warehouse. (n.d.). 18 January 2006. http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=1100179 37303. USEPA. “Red Jacket Salvage Yard.” On

- Scene Coordinator Profile. (n.d.). 18 January 2006. www.epaosc.net/redjacketsalvageyard

. Additional Contacts: Nicolas Brescia (OSC) , brescia.nicolas@epa.govAppendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Wisconsin

361 Site Information Site Name: Waste Research & Reclamation Co. EPA ID No.: WID990829475 Address: Route 7, Eau Claire, WI 54701 County: Eau Claire NPL Site: Deleted: 2/5/1993 In CERCLIS Database: 0505256 Site History and Description of Recycling Operation : This site was occupied by a roofing company from 1970 to 1981. Waste Research & Reclamation Co. has recycled oil and solvents from industrial sources at the 19

- acre site in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, since 1975. Hazardous wastes were also treated and stored on the site, which was privately owned and operated. It is located about 0.5 mile east of Lowes Creek, a tributary of the Chippewa River. The techniques used to handle an d store drums allowed wastes to spill on the site. Run

- off from waste processing has been collected in unlined impoundments. Organic solvents from the site contaminated ground water, according to analyses conducted by the state. However, to date, no residential wells are contaminated. This operation was primarily a reclamation and recycling facility for hazardous liquid waste. Waste materials handled included solvents and flammables. The site received RCRA permits in September 1988 and August 2003. Description of Contamination: The groundwater, soil, and surface water are contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) due to poor waste handling and storage procedures. This site was addressed in a long

- term remedial phase, focusing on cleanup of the entire site. The site was divided into six solid waste management units for investigation and cleanup purposes: drum storage sheds; trailer parking, product warehouse, and abandoned drum storage area; pole barn

- cooling water discharge area and abandoned drum storage area; abandoned lagoon, existing holding tank and existing collection sump for surface water runoff; a reclamation area, known as the LUWA area, located in the central and western portions of the site; and a reclamation area, known as the Kontro area, located in the south central portions of the site. The potentially responsible parties (PRPs) for site contamination conducted an investigation into the nature and extent of groundwater, surface water, and soil contamination at the site. In 1983, the state signed a consent order with the PRPs to implement a long

- term monitoring program. After adding this site to the NPL, USEPA performed preliminary investigations and determined that no immediate actions were required at the site while studies were taking place. These investigations determined that the site should be managed under the authority of RCRA and, therefore, the site was deleted from the NPL on February 5, 1993. Clean up costs at the site amounted to $6,470.32. Sources of Information: EPA Region 5. “NPL Fact Sheets for Wisconsin: Waste Research & Reclamation Co.” January 2004. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/region5/superfund/npl/wisconsin/WID990829475.htm. USEPA. Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS). 30 September 2004. 18 January 2006.Appendix 2

Profiles of Damage Cases f rom Hazardous Waste Recycling Wisconsin

362 USEPA. “NPL Site Narrative for Waste Research & Reclamation Co.” 7 October 2004. 18 January 2006. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/nar727.htm. USEPA. “Permit Series List.” RCRAInfo . 19 January 2006. USEPA. “Superfund Site Progress Profile for Waste Research & Reclamation Co.” CERCLIS

. 12 October 2006. 23 October 2006 http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/csitinfo.cfm?id=0505256 Additional Contacts: Robert Paulson (CIC), (312) 886

- 0272