alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 16

- 00164

- CR

TIMOTHY LEON LUECK, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 336th District Court Fannin County, Texas Trial Court No. 15

- 25575

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R Court reporter Charla Reamy recorded the trial court proceedings in appellate cause
numbe r 06

- 16

- 00164

- CR, styled Timothy Leon Lueck v. The State of Texas , trial court cause
number 15

- 25575 in the 336th Judicial District Court of Fannin County, Texas. A copy of this record has been requested by a family member of Timothy Leon Lueck. Prior to releasing certain portions of the reporter’s record, we asked Reamy to redact sensitive data from those portions of the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10. Reamy has respectfully declined to redact the sensitive data as we requested. Sensitive da ta includes, (1) A driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government

- issued personal identification number; (2) bank account number, credit card number, and other financial account number; ( 3) a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.
T EX
. R. A PP . 9.10(a). Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” Further, “[t]he filing of a document constitutes a certification b y the filer that the document complies with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this rule.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(e). Having determined that volume seven of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, as that term is defined by Rule 9.10, we hereby ORDER Reamy to redact volume seven of any and all sensitive data included on pages 1

– 63 of that record. 1

1 Although the remaining portions of volume seven and volume eight likewise include sensitive data, Reamy need not redact those portions of the record as they are, by statute, confidential and not subject to release.3

The redacted reporter’s record is to be received by this Court no later than Wednesday,
March 14. If the redacted reporter’s record is not received by March 14, we warn Reamy that we may begin contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this Cour t for failing to obey its order

. IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT
Date: February 21, 2018
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                              EXHIBIT 21

                                                  DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY AS OF MARCH 31, 1998

            SUBSIDIARY                                                                           PLACE OF INCORPORATION
            ----------                                                                           ----------------------
<S>                                                                                   <C>
DRS Electronic Systems, Inc.                                                          United States of America (Delaware)
DRS Technical Services, Inc.                                                          United States of America (Delaware)
DRS Systems Management Corporation                                                    United States of America (Delaware)
DRS Laurel Technologies                                                               United States of America (Delaware)
DRS Precision Echo, Inc.                                                              United States of America (Delaware)
DRS Ahead Technology, Inc.                                                            United States of America (Delaware)
DRS Photronics, Inc.                                                                  United States of America (New York)
DRS Optronics, Inc.                                                                   United States of America (Delaware)
DRS Technologies Canada, Inc.                                                         United States of America (Delaware)
DRS Nova Scotia                                                                       Canada (Nova Scotia)
DRS Technologies Canada Company                                                       Canada (Nova Scotia)
DRS Technologies (Europe) Ltd.                                                        United Kingdom
DRS Technologies (UK) Ltd.                                                            United Kingdom
DRS Hadland Ltd.                                                                      United Kingdom
DRS Hadland GmbH                                                                      Federal Republic of Germany
DRS Hadland, Inc.                                                                     United States of America (Delaware)
DRS Air, Inc.                                                                         United States of America (Delaware)
DRS/MS, Inc.                                                                          United States of America (Delaware)
DRS International, Inc.                                                               United States of America (Delaware)
Diagnostic/Retrieval Systems (DRS) Technologies Parsippany B.V.                       Netherlands
Magnetic Heads Co. Ltd.                                                               Republic of Bulgaria
</TABLE>
#### People v Hazel

2d Dept: 145 AD3d 797 (Westchester)

denied 3/3/17 (Stein, J.)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7332** 

MARVIN LEON GRIMM, JR. , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. GENE JOHNSON, Director VA. Dept. of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer , Chief District Judge. ( 3:10

- cv - 00593

- JRS )

Submitted : March 29, 2012 Decided: April 5, 2012

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circu it.2 PER CURIAM: Marvin Leon Grimm, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration . The order s

are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies

r elief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Grimm has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motions for a certificate of appealability and for leave to proceed in fo rma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSE D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Grove Holdings LLC
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                          19,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    218,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               367,271
<PP&E>                                         217,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 879,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          204,762
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   879,675
<SALES>                                        350,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               350,369
<CGS>                                          284,895
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  284,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,049
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,011)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,821
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (21,832)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,832)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
# DLA Aviation Engineering Directorate wins prestigious awards 

/ Published July 7, 2016
RICHMOND, VA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Engineering Directorate’s Engineering and Technology Division was recently recognized by the Department of Defense for its outstanding contributions to this nation’s warfighters through cost savings or avoidances, quality improvements and efficiencies.

The division won three prestigious DoD Value Engineering Achievement Awards for fiscal 2015. DLA Aviation representatives received the awards during a ceremony at the Pentagon June 28. 

Tom Kennedy, Value Management program manager, said winning the awards was a testament to the hard work of the more than 40 government workers and contractors who work within the Engineering and Technology Division.

“Every one of them, in one way or another, is responsible for the success of this division,” said Kennedy. 

DLA Aviation won in three of the five DoD VE categories:

•**Project: Aviation Engineering Breakout Project**. These efforts resulted in newly expanded competition for 884 national stock numbers managed by DLA Aviation as well as savings of just under $16 million. 

•**Team: Should Cost/Price Challenge Team**. Direct cost savings accumulated by the Should Cost and Price Challenge Project for fiscal 2015 totaled $15.45 million. Improvements developed during the course of providing valuable information to DLA Aviation’s acquisition and finance division flow directly to customers in the form of lower unit pricing and align with the DLA Headquarters’ goals of decreasing direct material costs. These savings, based on focused efforts to provide effective Should Cost and Price Challenge recommendations, resulted in reduced prices from contract negotiations.  

•**Special Achievement**. DLA Aviation initiated 1,321 and completed 1,419 VE projects and 2,750 Should Cost and Price Challenge analyses. This resulted in savings of $98.6 million, $42 million of these savings were directly related to reduced procurement prices that resulted from projects focused on increasing competition for supply contracts through reverse engineering and other negotiated price reductions based on results from the application of value engineering methodology.      

Kennedy said in addition to the $98.6 million saved during fiscal 2015, DLA Aviation saved DoD roughly $152 million the year before, achieving VE savings in excess of $250 million in a two-year timeframe. 

“We saved the Department of Defense and taxpayers a lot of money,” said Kennedy.

Altogether, the DLA enterprise won a total of five fiscal 2015 Value Engineering Awards.
2017-0526.

#### In re H.D.

Warren App. No. CA2016-11-098, 2017-Ohio-1333.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-703

Rev. 1, 11/2013

Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 7/24/2014

Sample Number: 142521-001 Date Collected: 07/15/2014 09:18 Date Received: 7/15/2014

WWTP Inlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 313000 ng/L 10000 4000 TLT 07/23/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142521-002 Date Collected: 07/15/2014 09:13 Date Received: 7/15/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 168 ng/L 20 8 TLT 07/23/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142521-003 Date Collected: 07/15/2014 09:11 Date Received: 7/15/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 172 ng/L 20 8 TLT 07/23/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142521-004 Date Collected: 07/15/2014 09:01 Date Received: 7/15/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 9.7 ng/L 5 2 TLT 07/23/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142521-005 Date Collected: 07/15/2014 09:04 Date Received: 7/15/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 13.1 ng/L 5 2 TLT 07/23/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142521-006 Date Collected: 07/15/2014 09:26 Date Received: 7/15/2014

WWTP Outlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 11.5 ng/L 5 2 TLT 07/23/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142521-007 Date Collected: 07/15/2014 08:47 Date Received: 7/15/2014

FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 62.5 ng/L 10 4 TLT 07/23/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Amos Plant, 142521 Page 1 of 2
Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 7/24/2014

Sample Number: 142521-008 Date Collected: 07/15/2014 08:14 Date Received: 7/15/2014

Recirculation Pond Outlet at Weir 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 3.4 ng/L 1 0.4 TLT 07/23/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 142521-009 Date Collected: 07/15/2014 08:42 Date Received: 7/15/2014

Clearwater Pond at Weir 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 6.4 ng/L 2 0.8 TLT 07/23/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Dave Conover, Senior Chemist

Email dpconover@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4219

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4219

Amos Plant, 142521 Page 2 of 2
No. 10-6174.

#### Jason Arbutiski, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 946, 131 S. Ct. 372,

178 L. Ed. 2d 240,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7740.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 21

DYNCORP SUBSIDIARIES March 2002

AdvanceMed Corporation
Anedyn, Inc.
Anedyn Power Company
AT Professional Services Corporation
Dyn Funding Corporation
Dyn Marine Services, Inc.
Dyn Marine Services of Virginia, Inc.
Dyn/Mexico Holdings Inc.
Dyn Network Management, Inc.
Dyn Realty Corporation
Dyn Systems Technology, Inc.
DynAir Technical Services, Inc.
Dynalectron Corporation
DynCIS, Inc.
DynComm 2000 LLC
DynCorp Advanced Repair Technology, Inc.
DynCorp Aerospace Operations Inc.
DynCorp Aerospace Operations (UK) Ltd.
DynCorp Aviation Services, Inc.
DynCorp Biotechnology and Health Services, Inc.
DynCorp Information Systems LLC
DynCorp International LLC
DynCorp International Private Limited
DynCorp International Services, GmbH
DynCorp International Services, Inc.
DynCorp International Services, Ltd.
DynCorp International Services Ltd.
DynCorp International Zwergniederlassung Deutschland LLC
DynCorp of Colorado, Inc.
DynCorp Panama, Inc.
DynCorp Procurement Systems, Inc.
DynCorp Property Management, Inc.
DynCorpServices.com, Inc.
DynCorp Systems & Solutions LLC
DynCorp Technical Services International B.V.
DynCorp Technical Services LLC
DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc.
DynCorp Viar Inc.
DynEx, Inc.
DynMeridian Corporation
DynPar LLC
DynPort Vaccine Company LLC
DynRide LLC
DynSpace Corporation
DynTel Corporation
Electric Utility Construction, Inc.
Grupo DynCorp de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
Healthcare Integrity Services LLC
Kwajalein Services, Inc.
OLDHD Systems, Inc.
Pacific TSD Corporation
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1691]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-1173-000]


Union Electric Company; Notice of Filing

January 20, 1998.
    Take notice that on December 22, 1997, Union Electric Company (UE), 
tendered for filing a Service Agreement for Non-Firm Point-to-Point 
Transmission Service between UE and Engage Energy US, L.P. (EEU). UE 
asserts that the purpose of the Agreement is to permit UE to provide 
transmission service to EEU pursuant to UE's Open Access Transmission 
Tariff filed in Docket No. OA96-50.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before February 2, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1691 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00431

- CV

Jim R. LONG , individually and as general partner of Long Properties LTD.,

and R.L. Owens,

Appellants

v.

Jerlean Gohmert THEIS and Kenneth Theis,

Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09

- 10

- 48435

- CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal i s DISMISSED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them.

SIGNED August 21, 2013.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I,
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Lexon
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
30, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 19, 2009

/s/ Hyung Soon Lee Chief Executive Officer Chief
Financial Officer

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,143 and TA-W-34,143A]


Prentiss Manufacturing Company, Plants #3 and #4, and Corporate 
Offices/Distribution Center; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 2, 1998, applicable 
to all workers of Prentiss Manufacturing Company, Plant #3, Jumpertown, 
Mississippi. The notice was published in the Federal Register on March 
16, 1998 (63 12831).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The company reports that 
worker separations will occur at Plant #4 of Prentiss Manufacturing, 
Booneville, Mississippi when it closes in early July, 1998. The company 
also reports that worker separations occurred at the subject firms' 
Corporate Offices/Distribution Center, also located in Booneville, 
Mississippi. The workers are engaged in the production of men's shirts.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Prentiss Manufacturing Company adversely affected by 
increased imports of men's shirts and provide administrative office and 
distribution services.
    Acordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover 
the workers of Prentiss Manufacturing Company, Plant #4, and Corporate 
Offices/Distribution Center, Booneville, Mississippi.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-34,143 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Prentiss Manufacturing Company, Plant #3, 
Jumpertown, Mississippi (TA-W-34,143), Plant #4 and Corporate 
Offices/Distribution Center, Booneville, Mississippi (TA-W-34,143A) 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after December 30, 1996 through February 2, 2000 are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974.

    Signed at Washington D.C. this 22nd day of May, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-15988 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M