### Area Representativeness: This site represents maximum c oncentration on a micro scale.

Micro Scale

### CSA/MSA: Louisville-Jefferson County-El izabethtown-Scottsburg, KY-IN CSA / LouisvilleJefferson, KY-IN MSA 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Louisville Interstate (078) Site Name: Firearms Training AQS Site ID: 21-111-1041 Location: Firearms Training, 4201 Algonqui n Parkway, Louisville, KY 40211 County: Jefferson GPS Coordinates: 38.23158, -85.82678 Date Established: April 13, 1978 Inspection Date: November 24, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitor meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a stationary equipment shelter located on the grounds of the Firearms Training Center in Louisville, Kentucky. The sample inlet is 15 feet above ground level and 100 feet from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on November 24, 2008. The air monitoring site was found to be in accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, Appendices C, D, E and G.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards; to detect episode levels for the activation of emer gency control procedures; and to provide pollution levels for daily index reporting.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A. Monitor Type Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling
AEM Sulfur Dioxide SLAMS EPISODE AQI UV fluorescence Continuously

### Area Representativeness: This site represents population exposure on a neighborhood scale.

Neighborhood Scale

# Owensboro, KY

(Rev.5/23/08) AIRS ID ADDRESS PM2.5 PM10 SO2 NO2 CO O3 Metals Hg Wet Dep. VOC Carb -onyl Speciation MET
21-059-0005 716 Pleasant Valley Road X(tIe) X(eI) X(e) X(eI) X Owensboro (Daviess)
21-091-0012 Lewisport Elementary School X Lewisport (Hancock)
TOTAL 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

(e) Emergency Episode Monitor (I) Air Quality Index Monitor (t) Continuous PM Monitor

### CSA/MSA: Owensboro, KY MSA 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Evansville-Owensboro-Henderson Interstate (077) Site Name: Owensboro Primary AQS Site ID: 21-059-0005 Location: 716 Pleasant Valley Road, Owensboro, KY 42303 County: Daviess GPS Coordinates: 37.780833, -87.075556 Date Established: December 1, 1970 Inspection Date: December 17, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitors meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a stati onary equipment shelter located on the grounds behind the Wyndall’s Shopping Center in Owensboro, Kentucky. The sample inlets are 200 feet from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on December 17, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample lines and monitors were found to be in good condition. The site meets th e requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D, E and G.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards; to detect emergency pollution levels of criteria pollutants for activation of emergency control procedures; and to provide levels of pollutants for daily index reporting.

Monitors:

Monitor Type Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

AEM Nitrogen Dioxide SLAMS EPISODE Chemiluminescence Continuously

AEM Ozone SLAMS UV photometry Continuously

EPISODE AQI March 1 – October 31

FEM PM 2.5 SLAMS EPISODE AQI Gravimetric 24-hours every third day

PM 2.5 TEOM SPM Tapered element oscillating microbalance, gravimetric Continuously

AEM Sulfur Dioxide SLAMS EPISODE AQI UV fluorescence Continuously

Meteorological Other AQM grade instruments for wind speed, wind direction, humidity, barometric pressure and temperature Continuously Inlet Height (meters) 3.5

3.5

4.5

4.5

3.5

7.5

### Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

Area Representativeness: This site represents population exposure on a nei ghborhood scale for particulates, ozone and sulfur dioxide. This site also repres ents population exposure on an urban scale for nitrogen dioxide.

Criteria Neighborhood Scale

Nitrogen Dioxide Urban Scale

### CSA/MSA: Owensboro, KY MSA 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Evansville-Owensboro-Henderson Interstate (077) Site Name: Lewisport AQS Site ID: 21-091-0012 Location: Second and Caroline Streets, Lewispor t Elementary School, Lewisport, KY 42351 County: Hancock GPS Coordinates: 37.938889, -86.896944 Date Established: September 5, 1980 Inspection Date: December 17, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitor meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a stati onary equipment shelter located on the grounds of the Lewisport Elementary School in Lewisport, Kentucky. The sample inlet is 175 feet from the nearest road. The most recen t site inspecti on was conducted on December 17, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample line and monitor were found to be in good condition. The site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D, E and G.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine complia nce with National Ambient Air Quality Standards and to provide levels of ozone for daily index reporting.

Monitors:

Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

AEM Ozone 3.5 SLAMS UV photometry Continuously
AQI March 1 – October 31



### Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: This site represents maximum c oncentration on an urban scale.

Urban Scale

# Micropolitan Statistical Areas

(Rev.5/22/09) AIRS ID ADDRESS PM2.5 PM10 SO2 NO2 CO O3 Pb/ Metals Hg Wet Dep. VOC Carbonyl Speciation MET

21-013-0002 Airport, 34th & Dorchester X(s) X(s) X Middlesboro (Bell)

21-073-0006 803 Schenkel Lane X Frankfort (Franklin)
21-139-0003 DOT Garage, 811 Hwy 60 East X X X HG Smithland (Livingston)

21-139-0004 763 Bloodworth Road X X Livingston County 21-145-1004 Paducah Middle School, 342 Lone Oak Rd X X Paducah (McCracken)

21-145-1024 J-P RECC, 2901 Powell Street Xt(Ie) X(eI) X(e) X(eI) Paducah (McCracken)

21-151-0003 Mayfield Elementary, Bond St. X X(c) Richmond (Madison)

21-199-0003 Somerset Gas Co., Clifty Street X(s) Somerset (Pulaski)

TOTAL 5 1 2 1 0 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 2

(c) Collocated Monitor
(e) Emergency Episode Monitor
(I) Air Quality Index Monitor
(t) Continuous PM Monitor

### CSA/MSA: Middlesborough, KY Micropolitan Statistical Area 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Appalachian Intrastate (101) Site Name: Middlesboro AQS Site ID: 21-013-0002 Location: Middlesboro Airport, Middlesboro, KY 40965 County: Bell GPS Coordinates: 36.608056, -83.736944 Date Established: February 14, 1992 Inspection Date: November 27, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitors meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a stationary equipment shelter located on the grounds of the Middlesboro Airpor t in Middlesboro, Kentucky. The sample inlets are 55 feet from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on November 27, 2008. Upon inspection the sample lines and m onitors were found to be in good condition. Even though this site is for special purpose monitoring, the site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D, E and G.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards; to provide pollutant levels for daily index reporti ng; and to provide information on the transport of ozone into the region.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A. Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

AEM Ozone 4 SPM UV photometry Continuously
AQI March 1 – October 31

FRM PM 2.5 4.5 SPM Gravimetric 24-hours every third day

Meteorological 7.5 Other AQM grade instruments for wind speed, wind direction, humidity, barometric pressure and temperature Continuously

### Area Representativeness: The site represents population exposure on a neighbor hood scale for particulates. This site also represents transport on a regional scale for ozone.

Particulate Neighborhood Scale

Ozone Regional Scale

### CSA/MSA: Lexington-Fayette-Frankfort-Richmond, KY CSA / Frankfort, KY Micropolitan Statistical Area 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Bluegrass Intrastate (102) Site Name: Frankfort AQS Site ID: 21-073-0006 Location: 803 Schenkel Lane, Frankfort, KY 40601 County: Franklin GPS Coordinates: 38.219361, -84.838500 Date Established: January 1, 1999 Inspection Date: December 5, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitor meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is located on the roof of the Ragland Building in Frankfort, Kentucky. The sample inlet is 250 feet from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on December 5, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample inlet and monitor were found to be in good condition. The site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D and E.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objective is to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A. Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

FEM PM 2.5 5.5 SLAMS Gravimetric 24-hours every third day

### Area Representativeness: The site represents population exposure on a ne ighborhood scale.

Criteria Neighborhood Scale

### CSA/MSA: Paducah-Mayfield, KY-IL CSA / Paducah, KY-IL Micropolitan Statistical Area 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Paducah-Cairo Interstate (072) Site Name: Smithland AQS Site ID: 21-139-0003 Location: KY DOT Garage, 811 HWY 60 East, Smithland, KY 42081 County: Livingston GPS Coordinates: 37.155556, -88.393056 Date Established: April 1, 1988 Inspection Date: December 18, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitors meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a stationary equipment shelter located on the grounds of the KY DOT Highway Garage in Smithland, Kentucky. The sample inlets are 1200 feet from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on December 18, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample lines and monitors were found to be in good condition. The site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D, E and G.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objective is to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Monitors:

Monitor Type Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

AEM Ozone SLAMS UV photometry Continuously AQI March 1 – October 31

Mercury – ambient SPM Cold vapour fluorescence spectrometry Continuously

Mercury – Wet Deposition SPM Wet deposition collected, analysis of sample by the Environmental Services Laboratory Weekly Inlet Height (meters) 3.8

3.9 AEM Sulfur Dioxide 3.9 SPM UV fluorescence Continuously



### Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: This site represents maximum c oncentration on an urban scale.

Urban Scale

### CSA/MSA: Paducah-Mayfield, KY-IL CSA / Paducah, KY-IL Micropolitan Statistical Area 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Paducah-Cairo Interstate (072) Site Name: Bloodworth AQS Site ID: 21-139-0004 Location: 763 Bloodworth Road, Smithland, KY 42081 County: Livingston GPS Coordinates: 37.070833, -88.334167 Date Established: September 15, 1986 Inspection Date: December 18, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitors meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a stationary equipment shelter located at the residence of 763 Bloodworth Road in Livingston County, Kentucky. The sample inlets are 1200 feet from the nearest road. The most recen t site inspection was conducted on December 18, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample lines and samplers were found to be in good condition.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine if air toxi cs are present in the ambient air and to quantify them.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A. Monitor Type Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling



### Volatile Organic Compounds SPM 

### EPA method TO-15 24-hours every sixth day

Meteorological Other AQM grade instruments for wind speed, wind direction, humidity, barometric pressure and temperature Continuously Inlet Height (meters) 4.3

7.5

### Area Representativeness: The site represents source impact on a neighborhood scale.

Neighborhood Scale

### CSA/MSA: Paducah-Mayfield, KY-IL CSA / Paducah, KY-IL Micropolitan Statistical Area 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Paducah-Cairo Interstate (072) Site Name: Paducah Middle School AQS Site ID: 21-145-1004 Location: Paducah Middle School, 342 Lone Oak, Paducah, KY 42001 County: McCracken GPS Coordinates: 37.065556, -88.637778 Date Established: July 1, 1969 Inspection Date: December 18, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitors meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is located on the roof of the Paducah Middle School in Paducah, Kentucky. The sample inlets are 110 feet from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on December 18, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample inlets and monitors were found to be in good condition. The site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D and E.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objective is to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality standards.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A. Monitor Type Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

FEM PM 2.5 SLAMS Gravimetric 24-hours every third day

FRM PM 10 SLAMS Gravimetric 24-hours every sixth day Inlet Height (meters) 11

11

### Area Representativeness: This site represents populati on exposure on a neighborhood scale.

Neighborhood Scale

### The monitoring site is a stationary equipment shelter located on the grounds of the Jacks on Purchase RECC in Paducah, Kentucky. The sample inlets are 31 feet from the nearest road. The most recent si te inspection was conducted on December 18, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample inlets and monitors were found to be in good condition. The site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D, E and G.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards; to detect elevated pollutant levels for activation of emergency control procedures for nitrogen dioxide, ozone and sulfur dioxide; and to provide polluta nt levels for daily ai r quality index reporting.

Monitors:

Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

AEM Nitrogen Dioxide 3.7 SLAMS EPISODE Chemiluminescence Continuously

AEM Ozone 3.7 SLAMS AQI UV photometry Continuously March 1 – October 31 EPISODE
PM 2.5 TEOM 4.7 SPM AQI Tapered element oscillating microbalance, gravimetric Continuously

AEM Sulfur Dioxide 3.7 SLAMS AQI EPISODE UV fluorescence Continuously 

### CSA/MSA: Paducah-Mayfield, KY-IL CSA / Paducah, KY-IL Micropolitan Statistical Area 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Paducah-Cairo Interstate (072) Site Name: Jackson Purchase Paducah Primary AQS Site ID: 21-145-1024 Location: Jackson Purchase RECC, 2901 Powell Street, Paducah, KY 42003 County: McCracken GPS Coordinates: 37.058056, -88.572500 Date Established: August 15, 1980 Inspection Date: December 18, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitors meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: This site represents population exposure on a nei ghborhood scale for ozone, particulates and sulfur dioxide. This site also repres ents population exposure on an urban scale for nitrogen dioxide.

Neighborhood Scale

Nitrogen Dioxide Urban Scale

### CSA/MSA: Lexington-Fayette-Frankfort-Richmond, KY CSA / Richmond-Berea, KY Micropolitan Statistical Area 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Bluegrass Intrastate (102) Site Name: Richmond AQS Site ID: 21-151-0003 Location: Mayfield School, Bond Street, Richmond, KY 40475 County: Madison GPS Coordinates: 37.738056, -84.285556 Date Established: January 1, 1999 Inspection Date: December 5, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitor meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is located on the roof of the Mayfield Elementary School in Richmond, Kentucky. The sample inlet is 200 feet from the nearest ro ad. The most recent site inspection was conducted on December 5, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample inlet and monitor were found to be in good condition. The site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D and E. This si te will also be the location for a source-oriented lead monitor in January 2010.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine complianc e with National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Monitors:

Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

FRM PM 2.5 6.6 SLAMS Gravimetric 24-hours every third day

FRM Lead SLAMS 40 CFR Part 50 Appendix G 24-hours every sixth day

-Collocated FRM Lead SLAMS 40 CFR Part 50 Appendix G 24-hours every sixth day



### Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: This site represents population exposure on a nei ghborhood scale for particulates. This site also represents source impact on a neighborhood scale for lead.

Criteria Neighborhood Scale

Lead Neighborhood Scale at 1 km

### CSA/MSA: Somerset, KY Micropolitan Statistical Area 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Control Region: South Central Kent ucky Intrastate (105) Site Name: Somerset AQS Site ID: 21-199-0003 Location: Somerset Gas Company, Clif ty Street, Somerset, KY 42501 County: Pulaski GPS Coordinates: 37.097500, -84.611667 Date Established: February 14, 1992 Inspection Date: November 26, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status : Site and monitors meet all desi gn criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a stationary equipment shelter located on the grounds of the Somers et Gas Company Warehouse on Clifty Street in Somerset, KY. The sample inlets are 35 feet from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on November 26, 2008. Upon inspection the sample line and monitors were found to be in good condition. The site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D, E and G.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine complia nce with National Ambient Air Quality Standards and to provide levels of ozone and part iculate matter for daily index reporting.

Monitors:

Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

AEM Ozone 4 SPM UV photometry Continuously
AQI March 1 – October 31

PM 2.5 BAM SPM AQI Beta Attenuation Mass Monitor Continuously



### Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: The site represents population ex posure on an urban scale for ozone. This site also represents population exposure on a neighborho od scale for particulates.

Ozone Urban Scale Neighborhood Scale(Rev.6/30/09) AIRS ID ADDRESS PM2.5 PM10 SO2 NO2 CO O3 Pb/ Metals Hg Wet Dep. VOC Carbonyl Speciation MET 21-043-0500 Camp Webb, Grayson Lake X X(c) X(s) X(c) X X HG X X X X Grayson (Carter) 21-157-0014 TVA Substation X(c) Calvert City (Marshall) 21-157-0016 Atmos Energy X Calvert City (Marshall) 21-157-0018 Calvert City Elementary X(s) X X Calvert City (Marshall) 21-157-0019 4237 Gilbertsville Hwy X Calvert City (Marshall) 21-183-0032 Keytown Road X(st) X(s) X X HG X Echols (Ohio) 21-193-0003 Perry County Horse Park Xt X(s) X Hazard (Perry)
21-195-0002 101 N. Mayo Trail, DOT Office X(ct) X(s) Pikeville (Pike)

TOTAL 7 4 0 0 0 4 5 2 2 6 1 1 3

(c) Collocated Monitor (s) Special Purpose Monitor
(t) Continuous PM Monitor 21-213-0004 KY DOT Garage, KY 1008 X(s) Franklin (Simpson) TBA Salem Elementary X Russell Springs (Russell) 

# Not in a MSA

### CSA/MSA: Not in a MSA - Rural 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Huntington (WV)-Ashland (KY )-Portsmouth-Ironton (OH) Interstate (103) Site Name: Grayson Lake AQS Site ID: 21-043-0500 Location: Camp Webb at Grayson Lake Grayson Lake, KY 41143 County: Carter GPS Coordinates: 38.238333, -82.988333 Date Established: May 13, 1981 Inspection Date: October 24, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitors meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a stationary equipment shelter in a fenced area located in a remo te section of Camp Webb in Grayson, Kentucky. The nearest road is a service road to the site. The most recent site inspection was conducted on October 24, 2008. Upon inspec tion, the sample lines and monitors were found to be in good condition. The site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D, E and G.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards; to determine background levels of PM 2.5 

### ; to provide ozone data upwi nd of the Ashland area; to measure background levels of Mercury in ambient air and in precipitation; and to measure rural concentrations of a sub-group of air t oxics for use in national assessment.

Monitors:

Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

AEM Ozone 4 SPM UV photometry Continuously
AQI March 1 – October 31
FEM PM 2.5 3.2 SLAMS Gravimetric 24-hours every third day

PM 2.5 Speciation 4.5 SLAMS Thermal optical, ion chromatography, and X-ray fluorescence 24-hours every sixth day

FRM PM 10 3 SLAMS Gravimetric 24-hours every sixth day

-Collocated PM 10 3 SLAMS Gravimetric 24-hours every sixth day

-Metals PM 10 SPM Determined from the PM 10 sample using EPA method IO 3.5 Same as PM 10

Mercury - ambient 4.2 SPM Cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry Continuously

### Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

Area Representativeness: The site represents background levels on an urban s cale for particulates and mercury. This site also represents upwind/background levels on an urban scal e for ozone and population exposure on an urban scale for wet deposition.

Mercury - Wet deposition 1.5 SPM Wet deposition collected, analysis of sample by the Environmental Services Laboratory using EPA method 1631, Revision E Weekly

Volatile Organics Compound 4 NATTS EPA method TO-15 24-hours every sixth day

Carbonyls 3.5 NATTS EPA method TO-11A 24-hours every sixth day

Chrome VI 3.5 NATTS SOP for the Determination of Hexavalent Chromium in Ambient Air Analyzed by Ion Chromatography (IC) 24-hours every sixth day Wet deposition 1.3 SPM Wet deposition collected, analysis of sample by the Environmental Services Laboratory Weekly

-Collocated Chrome VI 3.5 NATTS SOP for the Determination of Hexavalent Chromium in Ambient Air Analyzed by Ion Chromatography (IC) 24-hours every twelfth day

Meteorological 7.5 Other AQM grade instruments for wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity, temperature, solar radiation and rain gauge Continuously Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons NATTS EPA method TO-13A 24-hours every sixth day



### Urban Scale

### CSA/MSA: Not in a MSA - Rural 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Control Region: Paducah – Cairo Interstate (072) Site Name: TVA Calvert City AQS Site ID: 21-157-0014 Location: Ballpark Road, Calvert City, KY 42029 County: Marshall GPS Coordinates: 37.024200, -88.195100 Date Established: January 1, 2005 Inspection Date: December 18, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status : Site and monitors meet all desi gn criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is an air toxics monitor location off Ballpark Road in Calvert City, Kentucky. The samp le inlet is 2 meters above ground level. The most recent site in spection was conducted on December 18, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample inlets and monitors were found to be in good condition.

Monitor Type Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling



### Volatile Organic Compounds SPM 

### EPA method TO-15 24-hours every sixth day Inlet Height (meters) 2



### - Collocated Volatile Organic Compounds 2 SPM 

### EPA method TO-15 24-hours every sixth day 

### Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to de termine if toxic air pollutants ar e present and to quantify them.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: This site represents source orie nted exposure on a middle scale.

Middle Scale

### CSA/MSA: Not in a MSA - Rural 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Control Region: Paducah – Cairo Interstate (072) Site Name: Atmos Calvert City AQS Site ID: 21-157-0016 Location: KY95, Calvert City, KY 42029 County: Marshall GPS Coordinates: 37.023100, -88.211500 Date Established: January 1, 2005 Inspection Date: December 18, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status : Site and monitor meet all desi gn criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is an air toxics monitor location off KY95 in Calvert City, Kentucky. The sample inlet is 2 meters above ground level. Th e most recent site inspection was conducted on December 18, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample inlet and monito r were found to be in good condition.

Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling



### Volatile Organic Compounds 1.9 SPM 

### EPA method TO-15 24-hours every sixth day 

### Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to de termine if toxic air pollutants ar e present and to quantify them.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: This site represents source orient ed exposure on a neighborhood scale.

Neighborhood Scale

### CSA/MSA: Not in a MSA - Rural 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Control Region: Paducah – Cairo Interstate (072) Site Name: Calvert City Elementary AQS Site ID: 21-157-0018 Location: Calvert City Elementary, 623 5 th 

### Avenue, Calvert City, KY 42029 County: Marshall GPS Coordinates: 37.026916, -88.343944 Date Established: May 1, 2005 Inspection Date: December 18, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status : Site and monitors meet all desi gn criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a stationary equipment shelter located on the grounds of the Ca lvert City Elementary in Calvert City, Kentucky. The samp le inlets are 80 feet from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on December 18, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample inlets and monitors were found to be in good condition. The site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D and E.

Monitor Type Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling



### Volatile Organic Compounds SPM 

### EPA method TO-15 24-hours every sixth day Inlet Height (meters)

4.4



### Meteorological 7.5 Other 

### AQM grade instruments for wind speed, wind direction, humidity, barometric pressure and temperature Continuously - Metals PM 10 SPM Determined from the PM 10 sample using EPA method IO 3.5 Same as PM 10 FRM PM 10 4.5 SPM Gravimetric 24-hours every sixth day 

### Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine if toxic air pollutants are present and to quantify them; and to provide meteorological data for air toxics analysis.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: This site represents populati on exposure on a neighborhood scale.

Neighborhood Scale

Calvert City Air Toxics Network

### CSA/MSA: Not in a MSA - Rural 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Control Region: Paducah – Cairo Interstate (072) Site Name: Lazy Daz AQS Site ID: 21-157-0019 Location: 4237 Gilbertsville Hi ghway, Calvert City, KY 42029 County: Marshall GPS Coordinates: 37.03718, -88.33411 Date Established: September 15, 2007 Inspection Date: December 18, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status : Site and monitor meet all desi gn criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is solar power ed, battery charged, air toxics monitor located on the Brady propert y of the Lazy Daz mobile home park, in Calvert City, Kentucky. The sample inlet is 154 meters from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on December 18, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample inlet and monitor were found to be in good condition.

Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling



### Volatile Organic Compounds 2 SPM 

### EPA method TO-15 24-hours every sixth day 

### Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to de termine if toxic air pollutants ar e present and to quantify them.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: This site represents source orient ed exposure on a neighborhood scale.

Neighborhood Scale

### CSA/MSA: Not in a MSA - Rural 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Region: Evansville-Owensboro-Henderson Interstate (077) Site Name: Echols AQS Site ID: 21-183-0032 Location: Keytown Road, Echols, KY 42320 County: Ohio GPS Coordinates: 37.319725, -86.956097 Date Established: February 1, 2005 Inspection Date: December 17, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status: Site and monitors meet all design criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a stationary equipment shelter located on farmland off Keytown Road near the intersection with Pond Church Road in Echols, Kentuc ky. The sample inlets are 100 feet from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on December 17, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample lines and monitors were found to be in good condition. The site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D and E.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objective is to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Monitors:

Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

FRM PM 10 2.2 SPM Gravimetric 24-hours every sixth day

-Metals PM 10 SPM Determined from the PM 10 sample using EPA method IO 3.5 Same as PM 10

Mercury - ambient 2.5 SPM Cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry Continuously PM2.5 TEOM 2.7 SPM Tapered element oscillating microbalance, gravimetric Continuously

Mercury - Wet deposition 1.3 SPM Wet deposition collected, analysis of sample by the Environmental Services Laboratory Weekly

Meteorological 7.5 Other AQM grade instruments for wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity, temperature and rain gauge Continuously FEM PM 2.5 2.2 SPM Gravimetric 24-hours every third day

### Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

Area Representativeness: This site represents source orie nted exposure on an urban scale.

Urban Scale

### CSA/MSA: Not in a MSA - Rural 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Control Region: Appalachian Intrastate (101) Site Name: Hazard AQS Site ID: 21-193-0003 Location: Perry County Horse Park, Hazard, KY 41701 County: Perry GPS Coordinates: 37.283056, -83.220278 Date Established: April 1, 2000 Inspection Date: November 26, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status : Site and monitors meet all desi gn criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a st ationary equipment shelter located on the grounds of the Perry County Horse Park in Hazard, Kentucky. The sample inlets are 65 feet from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on November 26, 2008. Upon inspection the sample lines and monitors were found to be in good condition. This site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D, E and G.

Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

AEM Ozone 4.5 SPM EPISODE UV photometry Continuously

AQI March 1 – October 31

Meteorological 7.5 Other AQM grade instruments for wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity, barometric pressure, and temperature Continuously PM2.5 TEOM 5.2 SPM AQI Tapered element oscillating microbalance, gravimetric Continuously 

### Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards; to detect elevated pollutant levels for activation of emergency control pro cedures for ozone; and to provide pollutant levels for daily index reporting.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: The site represents population e xposure on a neig hborhood scale.

Neighborhood Scale

### CSA/MSA: Not in a MSA - Rural 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Control Region: Appalachian Intrastate (101) Site Name: Pikeville Primary AQS Site ID: 21-195-0002 Location: DOT District Office, 101 North Mayo Trail, Pikeville, KY 41501 County: Pike GPS Coordinates: 37.482778, -82.535278 Date Established: May 1, 1994 Inspection Date: November 26, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status : Site and monitors meet all desi gn criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a st ationary equipment shelter located behind the DOT Distri ct Office building at 101 North Mayo Trail in Pikeville, KY. The sample inlets are 116 feet from the nearest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on November 26, 2008. Upon inspection the sample lines and monitors were found to be in good condition. This site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D, E and G.

Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

AEM Ozone 3.6 SPM UV photometry Continuously
AQI March 1 – October 31

PM2.5 TEOM 4.9 SPM AQI Tapered element oscillating microbalance, gravimetric Continuously - Collocated FRM PM 2.5 4.9 SLAMS Gravimetric 24-hours every sixth day FRM PM 2.5 4.9 SLAMS Gravimetric 24-hours every sixth day 

### Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine complianc e with National Ambient Air Quality Standards, and to provide pollutant levels for daily index reporting.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: The site represents population exposure on a neighbor hood scale for particulates. This site also represents population exposure on an urban scale for ozone.
Particulate Neighborhood Scale

Ozone Urban Scale

### CSA/MSA: Not in a MSA - Rural 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Control Region: South Central Kent ucky Intrastate (105) Site Name: Franklin AQS Site ID: 21-213-0004 Location: DOT Garage, KY 1008, Franklin, KY 42134 County: Simpson GPS Coordinates: 38.219361, -84.838500 Date Established: June 19, 1991 Inspection Date: December 4, 2008 Inspection By: Andrea P. Keatley Site Approval Status : Site and monitors meet all desi gn criteria for the monitoring network.

The monitoring site is a stationary equipment shelter located on the grounds of the DOT Garage on KY1008 in Franklin, Kentucky. The sample inlet is 200 feet from the n earest road. The most recent site inspection was conducted on December 4, 2008. Upon inspection, the sample line and monitor were found to be in good condition. The site meets the requirements of 40 CFR 58, Appendices C, D, E and G.

Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objectives are to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards; to measure ozone levels upwind of Bowling Green; and to provide data on interstate ozone transport.

Monitors:

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures have been impl emented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A. Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

AEM Ozone 4.3 SPM UV photometry Continuously AQI March 1 – October 31
Meteorological 7.5 Other AQM grade instruments for wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity, barometric pressure, and temperature Continuously

### Area Representativeness: The site represents population e xposure on an urban scale.

Urban Scale

### CSA/MSA: Not in a MSA - Rural 401 KAR 50:020 Air Quality Control Region: South Central Kent ucky Intrastate (105) Site Name: Salem Elementary AQS Site ID: TBA Location: TBA County: Russell GPS Coordinates: Date Established: January 1, 2010 Inspection Date: Inspection By: Site Approval Status :

Monitors: Superior Battery, located in Russe ll Springs, Kentucky, was identified as a lead source emitting over 1 tons per year of actual reported emissions in 2006. In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, a lead source monitoring site will be located at the Salem Elementary School in Russell Springs, Kentucky. The location of this source-oriented lead monitor was determined through the use of AERMOD modeling analysis.

Monitor Type Inlet Height (meters) Designation Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling

FRM Lead SLAMS Gravimetric 24-hours every sixth day 

### Monitoring Objective: The monitoring objective is to determine compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

Quality Assurance Status: All Quality Assurance procedures will be implem ented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A.

### Area Representativeness: The site represents maximum concentrations , from a source, on a middle scale for lead.

# APPENDIX A West Jefferson County Air T oxics Monitoring Stations Volatile Organics

AIRS ID Established Method Location Purpose 21-111-1041 1999 TO-15 4201 Algonquin Parkway Maximum Impact 21-111-0054 1999 TO-15 4211 Campground Road Maximum Impact 21-111-0058 1999 TO-15 Farnsley Middle School 3400 Lees Lane Neighborhood Exposure 21-111-0060 1999 TO-15 Chickasaw Park Neighborhood Exposure 21-111-0062 1999 TO-15 Cane Run Elementary Neighborhood Exposure 21-111-0067 2009 TO-15 Cannons Lane Neighborhood Exposure

# APPENDIX B

Louisville Metro Air Pollut ion Control District’s
Ambient Air Monitoring Work Plan For National Core (NCore) Monitoring Station

# Ambient Air Monitoring Work Plan For National Core (NCore) Monitoring Station

CBSA Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN MSA

Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District 850 Barret Avenue Louisville, KY 40204

### National Core (NCore) Multi-pollutant Monitoring Stations:

In October 2006 the United St ates Environmen tal Protection Agency (EPA) issued final amendments to the ambient ai r monitoring regulations for cr iteria pollutants. These amendments are codified in 40 CFR parts 53 and 58. The purpose of the amendments was to enhance ambient air quality monitoring to better serve current and future air quality needs. One of the most significant changes in the regulations was the requirement to establish National Core (NCore) multi-pollu tant monitoring stations. These stations will provide data on several pollutants at lower detection limits and replace the National Air Monitoring Station (NAMS) networks that have existed for several years. The final network plan must be submitted to EPA by July 1, 2009, and the stations must be operational by January 1, 2011.
In 2007, EPA provided funding to the Louisvi lle Metro Air Pollution Control District (LMAPCD) to begin the proce ss of establishing an NCore station in Jefferson County. In January 2008, the Kentucky Division for Air Quality delegated the responsibility for establishing and operating an NCore station to the District . Upon evaluating the existing network, historical data, census data, meteorology, and topograp hy the District recommends that the SLAMS site located at 2730 Cannons Lane be designated as the NCore site for the Louisville-Jefferson County CBSA.
Monitoring Objectives:

The NCore Network addresses th e following monitoring objectives:

• 

### timely reporting of data to the public through AIRNow, air quality forecasting, and other public re porting mechanisms

• 

### support development of emission strategies through air quality model evaluation and other observational methods

• 

### accountability of emission strategy progre ss through tracking long- term trends of criteria and non-criteria pollu tants and their precursors

• 

### support long-term health assessments that contribute to ongoing reviews of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

• 

### compliance through establishing nonattainment/attainment areas by comparison with the NAAQS

• 

### support multiple disciplines of scientif ic research, includ ing public health, atmospheric and ecological
Site Configuration:

The NCore sites must measure at a minimum PM 2.5 

### particle mass using continuous and integrated/filter based samplers, speciated PM 2.5 

### , PM 10-2.5 

### (PM 10c 

### ) particle mass, speciated PM 10-2.5 

### particle mass, O 3 

### , SO 2 

### , CO, NO/NO y 

### , wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity, and ambient temperature. Table 1 provi des a list of the sampling equipment and methodology currently used and proposed for the Cannons Lane NCore site

### Table 1: Monitors/Samplers

Monitor Type Designations Analysis Method Frequency of Sampling Startup Date Carbon Monoxide (CO) NCore AQI Automated Referenc e Method* utilizing trace level non-dispersive infrared analysis. Continuously 01/01/2010

Nitrogen Oxide (NO x 

### ) NCore AQI Automated Reference Method utilizing chemiluminescence analysis. Continuously 01/01/2010

Ozone (O 3 

### ) NCore AQI Automated Equivalent Method utilizing UV photometry analysis. Continuously 01/01/2010

Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 

### ) NCore AQI Automated Equivalent Method utilizing trace level UV fluorescence analysis Continuously 01/01/2010

Total Reactive Nitrogen (NO/NO y 

### ) NCore Automated method utilizing trace level chemiluminescence analysis. Continuously 01/01/2011

PM 2.5 

### Filter NCore Manual Reference Method utilizing gravimetric analysis. 1/3 days 01/01/2009

PM 2.5 

### Continuous NCore AQI Automated Equivalent Method* utilizing T apered E lement O scillating M icrobalance/gravimetric analysis Continuously 01/01/2009

PM 2.5 

### Speciation NCore Multi-species manual collection method utilizing thermal optical, ion chromatography, gravimetric, and X-ray fluorescence analyses. 1/6 days

1/3 days 01/01/2009

01/01/2011 PM 10c 

### Filter NCore Manual Reference Method* PM 10c 

### utilizing differential gravimetric analysis. 1/3 days 01/01/2009

PM 10-2.5 

### Speciation NCore Method pending 1/3 days Requirement under review Meteorological NCore Air Quality Measurements approved instrumentation for wind speed, wind direction, humidity, temperature, rainfall, and solar radiation Continuously 07/01/2009

Lead SLAMS Manual Reference Method TSP Sampler, Analytical method to be determined. 1/6 01/01/2011

Radiation RadNet RadNet fixe d station air monitor, manual and automated methods Continuously + 2 weekly filters 01/01/2009

Volatile Organic Compounds SPM EPA Compendium Method TO-15 utilizing Summa ® 

### passivated canisters 1/12 02/10/2009


### * Pending EPA designation

### Quality Assurance Status:
All Quality Assurance procedures shall be implemented in accordance with 40 CFR 58, Appendix A. The District’s current Quality Assurance Project Plan covers PM 2.5 

### , Ozone, NOx, SO 2 

### , CO, PM 2.5 

### Speciation, and meteorological meas urements. The Quality Assurance Project Plan will be revised to include trace level measurements and lead. Standard operating procedures manuals will be adopted or developed for new instrumentation.
Area of Representativeness:
40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D provides design criteria for ambient air monitoring. The monitoring objective for the NCore s ite is to produce data that re presents a fairly large area and therefore the spatial scale of the site is importan t. The spatial scal e defines the physical dimensions of the air parcel nearest to a m onitoring site throughout wh ich actual pollutant concentrations are reasonably si milar. It is determined by the characteristics of the area surrounding the air monitoring site and the site ’s distance from nearby air pollution sources such as roadways, factories, etc. In the case of urban NCore the spatial scales to be used are neighborhood and urban. Table 2 shows the area of representativeness for each pollutant for the Cannons Lane site.
Table 2: Spatial Scales for Each Pollutant

Pollutant Spatial Scale Comments Ozone Neighborhood and Urban Scale Use 10 km NO x 

### /NO y 

### Neighborhood and Urban Scale Use 10 km Carbon Monoxide Neighborhood Scale Th ere is no Urban scale for CO SO 2 

### Neighborhood Scale There is no Urban scale for SO 2 

### PM 10 

### /PM 2.5 

### /Lead Urban Radiation Urban VOCs Neighborhood

For neighborhood scale the area covered is up to a 4 km radius around the air monitoring site. This area is a mix of commercial, light industria l, and residential. Approximately 20% of the total population for Jefferson County lives within a 4 km radius of the site. This scale also includes 36 schools, 3 hospitals, 6 parks and 3 large shopping venues.
Urban scale is 4 km up to 50 km. 50 km woul d cover the entire MSA and overlap the current monitoring network. Dropping the s cale down to 10 km covers most of the urban core and a portion of the MSA currently not covered by air monitoring. On a 10 km scale the land use varies from light to heavy i ndustrial, commercial and dense residential. Approximately 50% of the total population for Jefferson Count y lives within 10 km of the site.

### Ozone, PM 2.5 

### , PM 10 

### , and NO x 

### urban scale (50 km)

CO neighborhood scale (4 km)

### The proposed NCore site is located east of th e urban core and north east of the heavier industrialized areas of the metro area. Th e wind rose (Parameter MPH) indicates the prevailing wind directions while the pollu tion roses show the distributions of PM 2.5 

### and ozone readings within the 16 quadrants. Th e placement of the NCore site east of the urban core provides the best location for m easuring transport and secondary pollutant formation from that area. The placement of the NCore site dow nwind of the more industrialized areas compliments the existing network which, is primarily designed to measure maximum concentration on a nei ghborhood scale. An added bonus would be measurement of transport from the NNE and NE quadrants which although monitored by sites in Southern Indiana, are not effectiv ely addressed by sites located in Kentucky.

### Site Description and Spacing:
401 KAR 50:20 Air Quality Control Region: Louisville Interstate (078) CBSA: Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN MSA Site Name: Cannons Lane AQS ID: 21-111-0067 Location: 2730 Cannons Lane County: Jefferson GPS Coordinates: 38.228833, -85.654403 Date Established: January 1, 2009 Inspection Dates: Initial site inspection by KyDAQ April 17, 2008 Site inspection by EPA December 9, 2008 Inspections By: Andrea P. Keatley, Kentucky Division for Air Quality Richard Guillot and Jerry Burger, EPA Region 4 SESD Site Approval Status: EPA approval as SLAMS December 22, 2008 NCore approval pending

___________________________________________________________________________

NCore and PM 2.5 

### SLAMS Siting Criteria
Appendix E to 40 CFR Part 58- Probe and Monitoring Path Si ting Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring contains specific location criteria applicable to NCore and SLAMS siting. The following measurements a nd data were obtained for evaluation of compliance with the criteria.
1. Horizontal Placement of Sampling Probes: The gaseous instruments will be placed in a 10’w x 16’l x 8’h air monitoring shelter to be located approximately 45 meters behind the (VET) building. The The station is located on property leased by LMAPCD. The property was used as a Vehicle Emissions Testing (VET) center but is now used primarily for storage. The location is in the NE quadrant of Jefferson County and is approximately 9 km from the urban core of Metro Louisville.


# X

### sample inlet(s) for CO, SO 2 

### , NO x 

### , and O 3 

### will be approximately 2 meters above the roof of the shelter and 4.5 meters above ground level. The sample inlet probe for the NOy sampler will be placed on a 10 meter nested tower.
The manual particulate samplers are on a wooden deck near the sampling shelter. The height of the inlets of the particulate samplers varies between 2-3 meters. Separation of the samplers on the deck varies from 1-2 meters depending on the flow rate of the samplers.
The continuous particulate sampler is curre ntly on the deck but will be moved to the roof of the air monitoring shelter on ce it is installed. The inlet will be 2 meters above the roof and 4.5 meters above ground. The cont rol unit will be located inside the temperatur e controlled shelter.

2. Spacing from Obstructions: VET Office/garage (h=7.5 meters): 45 meters Large Pine to the North West (estimated h=8 meters): from drip line 20 meters Small Pine to the North West (estimated h=5 meters): from drip line 14 meters Deciduous tree to the West (estimated h=5 meters): from drip line 30 meters Deciduous tree to the East (estimated h=7 meters): from drip line 16 meters Sampling platform from air monitori ng shelter (h=2.5 meters): 5.0 meters T-Hanger (estimated h=10 meters): 67 meters Army Reserve Center (estim ated h=10 meters): 68 meters National Guard Complex (estimated h= 10 meters): 76 meters

3. Spacing from Roadways: Tables E-1, E-2, and Figure E-1 of 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix E list the minimum distances from roadways a monitoring pr obe needs to be based on the average daily traffic (ADT) counts. Table 3 summarizes the findings and includes the minimum separation distance from roadways for each pollutant. ADT counts were obtained from a traffic count map generated from the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet’s website.

Table 3 Spacing from Roadways Analysis

Minimum Distance Required (meters) Roadway ADT Distance from site (meters) Ozone Table

E-1 NO/NO y Table

E-1 CO Table

E-2 PM Figure

E-1 Cannons Lane 18,709 (2006) 104 40 30 45 80 Dutchmans Lane 16,605 (2007) 441 40 30 45 80 I-64 79,332 (2008) 732 100 100 150 160 I-264 153,890 (2007) 833 250 250 150 160 Sidney Park Drive <1000 (estimated) 32 10 10 10 10 Dargue Blvd <1000 (estimated) 45 10 10 10 10

### 4. Spacing from Minor Sources: The closest source to the site is the Bowman Field Airport. The airport is a general aviation field with the majority of the air traffic being privately owned piston engine small aircraft. For FY 2008 the average take off and landings were reported as 52,712 or approxi mately 145 per day.
The main runway is approximately 854 meters from the site. The main terminal is approximately 1372 meters from the site.

Cannons Lane (CLAMS) 1 km radius

### N

W E

S

Direction Description Distance from Site

North Army Reserve Center (offices, storage, hangers) 68 meters North East Parking lot for VET center (25 spaces) 20 meters East Cannons Lane VET center (office and storage) 45 meters South East National Guard Complex & Sidney Park Drive 76 meters South Intersection of Sydney Park Drive and Dargue Blvd 76 meters South west View toward Dargue Blvd (paved area was VET stacking lane) 45 meters West Airport rental T-Hangers 67 meters North West Airport rental T-Hangers 72 meters

### Cannons Lane Ambient Air Monitoring Station

Site Details:
The photograph above was taken looking toward the NE and shows the sampling platform which is 8’w x 14’l and 18”h. The sa mple inlets are between 2-3 meters above the ground. The platform supports the PM 2.5 

### FRM, the PM 10c 

### , PM 2.5 

### Speciation, URG Carbon, and the RadNet sampler. It also has room for lead sampling if needed and room for the PEP audit equipment. Electrical serv ice to the platform is 100 amps with 5 (20 amp GFCI) outlets strategically placed on the platform to provide power to the instruments.
The air monitoring shelter will be located on the concrete pad in front of the site and approximately 6 meters from the sampling plat form. The shelter will be 10’w x 16’l x 8’h. The roof of the shelter w ill be flat to support the sample inlets for the continuous particulate sampler(s) and has a dditional room for other samplers if the need arises. The 10 meter meteorological tower will be next to the shelter and will be of the “nested” type to insure that the NOy convertor is kept ver tical and to ease servicing and calibration of the meteorological instruments. The shelter will be wired for 200 amp service and have internet and telephone connections. To ma intain temperatures between 30-40 o C the shelter will have a 24,000 BTU heat pump with a digital programmable thermostat. The shelter insulation will be a minimum R-18. On ce the shelter has been installed the chain link fence will be extended to enclose the entire site.

# APPENDIX C

Source Impact Le ad Monitoring Waiver Requests For Kentucky Division for Air Qualit y ( C -2 ) And Louisville Metro Air Pollutio n Control District ( C

- 75 )KY Division for Air Quality Lead Waiver Request Page 1 of 73 

# AERMOD Modeling Analysis in Support of the Lead NAAQS Waiver Requests for the State of Kentucky

Introduction On November 12, 2008, t he United States Environm ental Protection Agency (EPA) strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for lead. The revised standard is now set at 0.15 μg/m 3 

### for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) standards. In conj unction with the revision of the lead NAAQS, the EPA promulgated new network design criteria, which can be found in 40 CFR Part 58, Appendi x D, paragraph 4.5. Source-oriented monitoring is required for those facilities wh ich emit 1.0 ton per year (tpy ) or more of lead in the air.
The Kentucky Division for Air Quality (Division) received formal notification from EPA Region 4 in April 2009 of the source s within the Commonw ealth that were subject to lead monitoring per the revised regulations. Those seven facilities are listed in this document as Appendix A: Kentucky F acilities with Lead Emissions over 1.0 TPY . The facilities include: American Electric Power – Big Sandy Plant (Big Sandy), in Louisa, KY; Calgon Carbon in Catlettsburg, KY; Enersys in Richmond, KY; Newpage in Wick liffe, KY; North American Stainless (NAS) in Ghent, KY; Superior Battery in Russell Springs, KY; and Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Shawnee Fossil Plant in West Paducah, KY.
Section 4.5(ii) of Appendix D to 40 CFR 58 contains waiver provision for sourceoriented lead monitoring, if a state or local agency c an demonstrate that the lead source will not contribute to a maximum lead concentration in ambient air in excess of one-half of the Pb NAAQS (i.e., 0.075 μg/m 3 

### ). Consequently, the Division has modeled the facilit ies to determine whether or not to pursue waivers. Additionally, recent Kentucky Emissions Inventory data has been reviewed for this purpose. 

## Emissions Inventory Data The Division’s Emissions Inventory Secti on (EIS) has compiled calculations for 2006-2008 data for those seven facilit ies listed in the aforementioned Appendix A: Kentucky Facilities with Lead Emissions over 1.0 TPY.
Emissions Inventory Reports for all seven facilities are included with this document on a compact disc (CD) for re view. The CD (labeled KY DAQ EIS Data) also contains Kentucky Emissions Inventory data file s for 2006, 2007, and 2008, as well as permits for the facilities in question. Table 1 shows the results of the recent EIS calculations.KY Division for Air Quality Lead Waiver Request Page 2 of 73 

### Table 1. Kentucky Emissions Inventory Data

Facility Name Location 2006 Actual Emissions (tpy) 2007 Actual Emissions (tpy) 2008 Actual Emissions (tpy) Big Sandy Louisa 2.37 0.61 Not complete Calgon Carbon Catlettsburg 6.01 6.06 6.29
Enersys Richmond 0.11 2.16 1.45 Newpage Wickliffe 7.39 6.28 Not complete North American Stainless Ghent 0.98 0.59 0.65

Superior Battery Russell Springs 1.35 0.67 0.61

TVA Shawnee West Paducah 8.33 8.42 8.57



## Selection Criteria for the Modeled Facilities Pursuant to 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, paragraph 4.5(a), monitoring agencies must use the most recent National Emissions Inventory (NEI) or other scientifically justifiable data to determine if a facility emits more than 1 tpy of lead. The Division, at the direct ion of EPA Region 4, chose to use both state emissions inventory data and Toxic Release Invent ory (TRI) data from 2006 and 2007. 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D 4.5 (ii) states: “The Regional Administrator may waive the requirement in paragraph 4.5(a) for monitoring near lead (Pb) sources if the State or, where appropriate, local agency can demonstrate the Pb source will not contribute to a maximum Pb concentration in ambient air in excess of 50% of the NAAQS (based on historical monitoring data, modeling, or other means).” The lead NAAQS is based on a 3-month rolling average.



## Model Parameters

Urban versus Rural Determination The facilities modeled in this analysis were all modeled as rural. The rural setting was chosen based on the population dens ity procedure as stated in Section 7.2.3(d) of 40 CFR 51, A ppendix W. In addition, none of the facilities modeled fall into a highly industrialized category as mentioned subsequently in Section 7.2.3(e) of A ppendix W.
Meteorological Data In compliance with the EPA ai r quality modeling gu ideline found in Section 8.3 of 40 CFR Part 51, Appendi x W, the modeling performed for each facility relied on five years of consecutive meteorological data taken from the most representative surface and upper air meteorological stations. A summary of general meteorological modeling data can be found in Table 2. The meteorological dataKY Division for Air Quality Lead Waiver Request Page 3 of 73 

### years were chosen in part due to their av ailability and the completeness of the data. Unfortunately, the funding for more recent data for this particular project, which is in excess of $3,150, was not available. Theref ore, the facilities were modeled with meteorologi cal data ranging from 1988 to 1992, or 1989 to 1993, which is free to the public. Data sets deemed complete for the respective five years were chosen.

Table 2. Meteorological Modeling Data Facility Met Years Surface Ai r Station Upper Air Station Big Sandy 1988-1992 Huntington/Tri-State Airport Huntington/Tri-State Airport Calgon Carbon 1988-1992 Huntington/Tri-State Airport Huntington/Tri-State Airport Enersys 1988-1992 Lexington/Bluegrass Field Huntington/Tri-State Airport Newpage 1989-1993 Paducah/WSO Airport Paducah/WSO Airport North American Stainless 1988-1992 Covington/ Greater Cincinnati Dayton/Wright Patterson AFB Superior Battery 1988-1992 Lexington/Bluegrass Field Nashville/Int’l Airport

TVA Shawnee Fossil Plant 1989-1993 Paducah/WSO Airport Paducah/WSO Airport 

### Representativeness/Surface Characteristics According to the AERMOD Implement ation Modeling Guidelines, the meteorological stations should be repres entative of the facilit y. The National Weather Service (NWS) meteorological stations chosen for each facility depended on the facility’s location, topography, land use, and surface characteristics in reference to each facility. The surface roughness values at each facility were compared against th e surface roughness values of the respective meteorological surface stat ion and modeled separately to determine the difference in surface characteristics between them. In the interest of being conservative towards human health, the su rface characteristics which yielded the highest monthly concentration were used in calculating the 3-month rolling average. The surface roughness data (albedo, bowen ratio, and surface roughness values) for each of these faciliti es and meteorological stations can be found in Appendix B: AERSURFACE Tables . Surface roughness parameters are tabulated in Table 3. In AERSURFACE, the default 1 km radius was chosen, temporal resolution was set to “mont hly”, 12-30o averaged se ctors were used throughout the analysis, and the application site coordinates were set to the facility.KY Division for Air Quality Lead Waiver Request Page 4 of 73 

### Table 3. AERSURFACE defaults for the Met eorological Stations/Sites Used

Facility Surface Roughness Radius (km) Surface Moisture Temporal Resolution Number of 30° Sectors Big Sandy 1.0 Average Monthly 12 Calgon Carbon 1.0 Average Monthly 12 Enersys 1.0 Average Monthly 12 Newpage 1.0 Average Monthly 12 NAS 1.0 Average Monthly 12 Superior Battery 1.0 Average Monthly 12 TVA Shawnee 1.0 Average Monthly 12



### The land use was classified based on the 1992 National Land Cover Data (NLCD 92) which is available from the USGS. The NLCD 92 contains a 21-category land cover classification, which is based on Landsat imagery.
Pollutant Averaging The pollutant averaging time was set to 1-month. The 1-month average was converted to a 3-month rolling average us ing the lead post processor, which is available from EPA at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/pb-monitoring.html

. Building Downwash Building downwash was not deemed necessary for facilities with very tall stacks, such as those found at c oal-fired power plants. The stack heights for both AEP Big Sandy and TVA Shawnee exceed the Good Engineering Practices (GEP) stack heights. In addition, any facility si gnificantly over or under the 0.075 μg/m 3 

### lead concentration on a 3-month rolling average did not have the building downwash (BPIP) algorithm applied in th e model. Therefore, building downwash was only applied to the modeling for Su perior Battery based on preliminary modeling showing a 3-mont h rolling average concentra tion at one-half the lead NAAQS.

Lead Emission Sources The lead sources for each facility are tabulated in Appendix C of this document. The emission sources are based on the emissions data of the year that triggered the analysis as found in Appendix A.
AEP Big Sandy and TVA Shawn ee are both electric utilit ies. AEP Big Sandy uses 2 pulverized coal (pc) combustors. In t he case of TVA Shaw nee, 9 pc’s and 1 bubbling fluidized bed combustor are us ed. In addition, both facilities have smaller auxiliary units. Hence, their l ead emissions primar ily stem from the combustion of coal. Enersys and Superior Battery are both battery manufacturers. Their lead emissions are related to ba ttery plating and manufacture. Calgon Carbon produces activated carbon and carbon-based media. Their primary feedstock is bitumi nous coal, which is also the source material for their lead emissions. New page is a paper produc er whose primary lead emission point is their combinat ion boiler. North American Stainless produces stainless steel and their primary lead emissions are from a furnace.KY Division for Air Quality Lead Waiver Request Page 5 of 73 

### Receptors/Terrain As stated in Section 8.2.2 of Appendix A to Appendix W of 40 CFR 51, “Receptor sites for refined modeling should be utilized in sufficient detail to estimate the highest concentration and possible violatio ns of a NAAQS or PSD increment. In designing a receptor network, the emphasi s should be placed on receptor resolution and location, not total number of receptors. The selection of receptor sites should be a case-by-case determinat ion taking into consideration the topography, the climatology, monitor sites, and the results of t he initial screening procedure.”
The receptor grid parameters (spacing and number of receptors) were chosen in a way to encompass a majority of the plume as well as the significant impact area (SIA) in which the maximum impact occurs. The receptor grids are optimized to have the maximum concentration occur within a 100x100 meter grid. This is achieved by either expanding a tiered receptor grid or including a separate (uniform Cartesian) grid to cover the maximum impact area.
Digital Elevation Maps (DE M) or National Elevation Da ta (NED) maps available from the USGS were used for the AER MAP processor for each facility.
Table 4 provides a summary of paramete rs used in AERMOD, which includes the number and distance between receptors, whether bu ilding downwash was used, whether plant boundaries we re defined, and what ty pe of terrain data was chosen for the facilities.

Table 4. AERMOD General Summary Facility Model Total Receptors Receptor Grid Parameters Building Downwash Plant Boundaries Terrain DEM or NED Data Airport Model 1604 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 1000m/100m 5000m/500m 10000m/1000m Plus uniform Cartesian grid 100m x 100m to encompass SIA No Yes NED Big Sandy

Site Model 1163 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 1000m/100m 5000m/500m 10000m/1000m No Yes NED

Calgon Carbon Airport Model 1507 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 1500m/100m 3500m/500m 8000m/1000m No No NEDKY Division for Air Quality Lead Waiver Request Page 6 of 73
Site Model 1507 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 1500m/100m 3500m/500m 8000m/1000m No No NED

Airport Model 1039 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 100m/100m 3000m/500m No Yes NED Enersys

Site Model 1039 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 100m/100m 3000m/500m No Yes NED

Airport Model 3281 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 2000m/100m 10000m/500m 15000m/1000m No Yes NED NAS

Site Model 3281 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 2000m/100m 10000m/500m 15000m/1000m No Yes NED

Airport Model 1594 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 1000m/100m 5000m/500m 15000m/1000m Plus uniform Cartesian grid 100m x 100m to encompass SIA No Yes NED NewPage

Site Model 1602 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 1000m/100m 5000m/500m 15000m/1000m Plus uniform Cartesian grid 100m x 100m to encompass SIA No Yes NED

Airport Model 1410 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 1500m/100m 3500m/500m 8000m/1000m Yes No NED Superior Battery

Site Model 1410 Distance from Center/Tier Spacing 1500m/100m 3500m/500m 8000m/1000m Yes No NED

TVA Shawnee Airport Model 2949 3000m x 3000m Plus uniform Cartesian grid 100m x 100m to encompass SIA No Yes DEMKY Division for Air Quality Lead Waiver Request Page 7 of 73
Site Model 3556 3000m x 3000m Plus three uniform Cartesian grids: 100m x 100m to encompass SIA 750m x 500m 500m x 1000m No Yes DEM



### Non-Default Parameters The Division used a non-default option in the control pathway. The toxics nondefault option was chosen to access the total deposition output. In the source pathway, particulate was selected for gas and particle deposition. Method 2 was selected for handling particle de position by total particulate mass. Particle inputs for Method 2 consisted of the fine par ticle fraction equaling 0.75 and the mass mean particle diameter equaling 0.5 micron s. These values were selected from Appendix B of the AERMO D Deposition Algorithms - Science Document (Revised Draft) found on EPA’s Support Center for Regulatory Air Models (SCRAM) website at http://www.epa.gov/scram001/7t hconf/aermod/aer_scid.pdf

. 

## Results Using the parameters given in this document, the models were run. The results for each facility are tabulated Table 5.

Table 5. 3-Month Rolling Average Concentrations

Facility Surface Characteristics One-half Lead NAAQS (μg/m 3 ) 3-Month Rolling Average Concentration (μg/m 3 ) Airport 0.075 0.034 Big Sandy Plant Site 0.075 0.050 Airport 0.075 0.289 Calgon Carbon Site 0.075 0.286 Airport 0.075 0.244 Enersys Site 0.075 0.407 Airport 0.075 0.004 Newpage Site 0.075 0.015 Airport 0.075 0.001 North American Stainless Site 0.075 0.001 Airport 0.075 0.982 Superior Battery Site 0.075 1.341 Airport 0.075 0.001 TVA Shawnee Fossil Plant Site 0.075 0.000KY Division for Air Quality Lead Waiver Request Page 8 of 73 

### Upon review, the output concentrations from the models sh ow that Calgon Carbon, Enersys, and Superior Battery substantially surpass the modeled ambient concentration required to rece ive a waiver and indicate a modeled exceedance of the new le ad NAAQS. Data in Table 5 also illustrate that the 3- month rolling averages for AEP Big S andy, Newpage, TVA Shawnee, and North American Stainless are substantially below one-half the lead NAAQS.



## Modeled Plots Plots of the modeled high 1 st 

### high monthly impacts for the facilities can be found in Appendix D of this document. These figures are contour plots of the ambient lead concentrations as modeled. Please note, the concentration shown in the figures do not represent a 3-month rolling average but instead represent the highest monthly impact for the meteorolog ical years chosen. Receptors are not placed within plant boundaries for the facilit ies that have defined fence lines. Air within the plant boundary of these facilities are represented as white areas. The facilities without defined physical barrier s delineating the pr operty line have receptors within their plant boundaries in accordance with the definition of ambient air found in 40 CFR 50.1(e). T hese facilities boundaries are depicted as red boundary lines.


## Conclusion As mentioned previously, modeling has demonstrated that a waiver for monitoring lead at AEP Big Sandy, Newpage, TVA Shawnee, and North American Stainless can be requested based upon a maximum 3-month rolling average at or below one-hal f the lead NAAQS. The Ca lgon Carbon, Enersys, and Superior Battery facilities emissions have been modeled and shown to exceed one-half the lead NAAQS. Therefore, Calgon Carbon, Enersys, and Superior Battery should be monitored in accor dance with 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, paragraph 4.5(a).



## Additional Information Data has been complied for each facility and is available on the attached compact disc (CD) labeled KY DAQ Lead Modeling Data: AERMOD . Each facility has a designated folder which contai ns files specific the airport and site models. Each model has th ree folders: the Post Proc essor folder, the AERMET folder, and the AERMOD folder. The Post Processor folder contains the 3-Month Processor Output File (.out), Plot File (.plt), and a Post File (.pos). The AERMET folder contains the Profile File (.pfl) for Upper Air, Surfac e File (.sfc), AERMET Log File (.log), and the AERMET Output File (.out). The AERMOD folder contains the AERMOD Input File (.adi ) and the AERMOD Output File (.ado).KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 9 of 73Appendix A. Kentucky Facilities withLead Emissions over 1.0 TPYFacility CityStateLeadEmissions(tpy) Data SourceAMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER - BIG SANDY PLANTLOUISAKY2.372006 S/L DataCALGON CARBONCATLETTSBURG KY6.062007 S/L DataENERSYS RICHMONDKY2.162007 S/L DataNEWPAGE WICKLIFFEKY6.282007 S/L DataNORTH AMERICAN STAINLESSGHENTKY1.142007 TRISUPERIOR BATTERYRUSSELL SPRINGS KY1.352006 S/L DataTVA SHAWNEE FOSSIL PLANT WEST PADUCAH KY8.422007 S/L DataKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 10 of 73Appendix B. AERSURFACE TablesSuperior Battery AirportSuperior Battery SiteMonth Sector AlbedoBowenRatioSurface RoughnessLengthMonth Sector AlbedoBowenRatioSurface RoughnessLength1 1 0.17 0.79 0.0671 1 0.17 0.79 0.0651 2 0.17 0.79 0.0351 2 0.17 0.79 0.0791 3 0.17 0.79 0.0341 3 0.17 0.79 0.0511 4 0.17 0.79 0.0361 4 0.17 0.79 0.0411 5 0.17 0.79 0.0621 5 0.17 0.79 0.051 6 0.17 0.79 0.0431 6 0.17 0.79 0.0521 7 0.17 0.79 0.0421 7 0.17 0.79 0.0681 8 0.17 0.79 0.0381 8 0.17 0.79 0.1031 9 0.17 0.79 0.0761 9 0.17 0.79 0.0951 10 0.17 0.79 0.081 10 0.17 0.79 0.0341 11 0.17 0.79 0.0571 11 0.17 0.79 0.0731 12 0.17 0.79 0.0451 12 0.17 0.79 0.0552 1 0.17 0.79 0.0672 1 0.17 0.79 0.0652 2 0.17 0.79 0.0352 2 0.17 0.79 0.0792 3 0.17 0.79 0.0342 3 0.17 0.79 0.0512 4 0.17 0.79 0.0362 4 0.17 0.79 0.0412 5 0.17 0.79 0.0622 5 0.17 0.79 0.052 6 0.17 0.79 0.0432 6 0.17 0.79 0.0522 7 0.17 0.79 0.0422 7 0.17 0.79 0.0682 8 0.17 0.79 0.0382 8 0.17 0.79 0.1032 9 0.17 0.79 0.0762 9 0.17 0.79 0.0952 10 0.17 0.79 0.082 10 0.17 0.79 0.0342 11 0.17 0.79 0.0572 11 0.17 0.79 0.0732 12 0.17 0.79 0.0452 12 0.17 0.79 0.0553 1 0.15 0.41 0.0753 1 0.15 0.43 0.096KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 11 of 733 2 0.15 0.41 0.0463 2 0.15 0.43 0.1163 3 0.15 0.41 0.0473 3 0.15 0.43 0.0763 4 0.15 0.41 0.053 4 0.15 0.43 0.0613 5 0.15 0.41 0.0893 5 0.15 0.43 0.0743 6 0.15 0.41 0.063 6 0.15 0.43 0.0733 7 0.15 0.41 0.0573 7 0.15 0.43 0.1013 8 0.15 0.41 0.0483 8 0.15 0.43 0.1543 9 0.15 0.41 0.0973 9 0.15 0.43 0.1443 10 0.15 0.41 0.13 10 0.15 0.43 0.053 11 0.15 0.41 0.0683 11 0.15 0.43 0.1023 12 0.15 0.41 0.0513 12 0.15 0.43 0.0844 1 0.15 0.41 0.0754 1 0.15 0.43 0.0964 2 0.15 0.41 0.0464 2 0.15 0.43 0.1164 3 0.15 0.41 0.0474 3 0.15 0.43 0.0764 4 0.15 0.41 0.054 4 0.15 0.43 0.0614 5 0.15 0.41 0.0894 5 0.15 0.43 0.0744 6 0.15 0.41 0.064 6 0.15 0.43 0.0734 7 0.15 0.41 0.0574 7 0.15 0.43 0.1014 8 0.15 0.41 0.0484 8 0.15 0.43 0.1544 9 0.15 0.41 0.0974 9 0.15 0.43 0.1444 10 0.15 0.41 0.14 10 0.15 0.43 0.054 11 0.15 0.41 0.0684 11 0.15 0.43 0.1024 12 0.15 0.41 0.0514 12 0.15 0.43 0.0845 1 0.15 0.41 0.0755 1 0.15 0.43 0.0965 2 0.15 0.41 0.0465 2 0.15 0.43 0.1165 3 0.15 0.41 0.0475 3 0.15 0.43 0.0765 4 0.15 0.41 0.055 4 0.15 0.43 0.0615 5 0.15 0.41 0.0895 5 0.15 0.43 0.0745 6 0.15 0.41 0.065 6 0.15 0.43 0.0735 7 0.15 0.41 0.0575 7 0.15 0.43 0.1015 8 0.15 0.41 0.0485 8 0.15 0.43 0.154KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 12 of 735 9 0.15 0.41 0.0975 9 0.15 0.43 0.1445 10 0.15 0.41 0.15 10 0.15 0.43 0.055 11 0.15 0.41 0.0685 11 0.15 0.43 0.1025 12 0.15 0.41 0.0515 12 0.15 0.43 0.0846 1 0.18 0.5 0.0946 1 0.18 0.4 0.3026 2 0.18 0.5 0.1176 2 0.18 0.4 0.3416 3 0.18 0.5 0.1386 3 0.18 0.4 0.2696 4 0.18 0.5 0.166 4 0.18 0.4 0.2386 5 0.18 0.5 0.2426 5 0.18 0.4 0.2576 6 0.18 0.5 0.1936 6 0.18 0.4 0.2576 7 0.18 0.5 0.1076 7 0.18 0.4 0.3276 8 0.18 0.5 0.0776 8 0.18 0.4 0.4116 9 0.18 0.5 0.1526 9 0.18 0.4 0.4036 10 0.18 0.5 0.1276 10 0.18 0.4 0.2036 11 0.18 0.5 0.0766 11 0.18 0.4 0.316 12 0.18 0.5 0.066 12 0.18 0.4 0.2887 1 0.18 0.5 0.0947 1 0.18 0.4 0.3027 2 0.18 0.5 0.1177 2 0.18 0.4 0.3417 3 0.18 0.5 0.1387 3 0.18 0.4 0.2697 4 0.18 0.5 0.167 4 0.18 0.4 0.2387 5 0.18 0.5 0.2427 5 0.18 0.4 0.2577 6 0.18 0.5 0.1937 6 0.18 0.4 0.2577 7 0.18 0.5 0.1077 7 0.18 0.4 0.3277 8 0.18 0.5 0.0777 8 0.18 0.4 0.4117 9 0.18 0.5 0.1527 9 0.18 0.4 0.4037 10 0.18 0.5 0.1277 10 0.18 0.4 0.2037 11 0.18 0.5 0.0767 11 0.18 0.4 0.317 12 0.18 0.5 0.067 12 0.18 0.4 0.2888 1 0.18 0.5 0.0948 1 0.18 0.4 0.3028 2 0.18 0.5 0.1178 2 0.18 0.4 0.3418 3 0.18 0.5 0.1388 3 0.18 0.4 0.269KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 13 of 738 4 0.18 0.5 0.168 4 0.18 0.4 0.2388 5 0.18 0.5 0.2428 5 0.18 0.4 0.2578 6 0.18 0.5 0.1938 6 0.18 0.4 0.2578 7 0.18 0.5 0.1078 7 0.18 0.4 0.3278 8 0.18 0.5 0.0778 8 0.18 0.4 0.4118 9 0.18 0.5 0.1528 9 0.18 0.4 0.4038 10 0.18 0.5 0.1278 10 0.18 0.4 0.2038 11 0.18 0.5 0.0768 11 0.18 0.4 0.318 12 0.18 0.5 0.068 12 0.18 0.4 0.2889 1 0.18 0.79 0.0919 1 0.18 0.79 0.3029 2 0.18 0.79 0.1149 2 0.18 0.79 0.3419 3 0.18 0.79 0.1349 3 0.18 0.79 0.2699 4 0.18 0.79 0.1589 4 0.18 0.79 0.2389 5 0.18 0.79 0.2399 5 0.18 0.79 0.2579 6 0.18 0.79 0.1889 6 0.18 0.79 0.2579 7 0.18 0.79 0.0979 7 0.18 0.79 0.3279 8 0.18 0.79 0.0699 8 0.18 0.79 0.4119 9 0.18 0.79 0.1449 9 0.18 0.79 0.4039 10 0.18 0.79 0.1189 10 0.18 0.79 0.2039 11 0.18 0.79 0.0719 11 0.18 0.79 0.319 12 0.18 0.79 0.0559 12 0.18 0.79 0.28810 1 0.18 0.79 0.091 10 1 0.18 0.79 0.30210 2 0.18 0.79 0.114 10 2 0.18 0.79 0.34110 3 0.18 0.79 0.134 10 3 0.18 0.79 0.26910 4 0.18 0.79 0.158 10 4 0.18 0.79 0.23810 5 0.18 0.79 0.239 10 5 0.18 0.79 0.25710 6 0.18 0.79 0.188 10 6 0.18 0.79 0.25710 7 0.18 0.79 0.097 10 7 0.18 0.79 0.32710 8 0.18 0.79 0.069 10 8 0.18 0.79 0.41110 9 0.18 0.79 0.144 10 9 0.18 0.79 0.40310 10 0.18 0.79 0.11810 10 0.18 0.79 0.203KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 14 of 7310 11 0.18 0.79 0.07110 11 0.18 0.79 0.3110 12 0.18 0.79 0.05510 12 0.18 0.79 0.28811 1 0.18 0.79 0.091 11 1 0.18 0.79 0.30211 2 0.18 0.79 0.114 11 2 0.18 0.79 0.34111 3 0.18 0.79 0.134 11 3 0.18 0.79 0.26911 4 0.18 0.79 0.158 11 4 0.18 0.79 0.23811 5 0.18 0.79 0.239 11 5 0.18 0.79 0.25711 6 0.18 0.79 0.188 11 6 0.18 0.79 0.25711 7 0.18 0.79 0.097 11 7 0.18 0.79 0.32711 8 0.18 0.79 0.069 11 8 0.18 0.79 0.41111 9 0.18 0.79 0.144 11 9 0.18 0.79 0.40311 10 0.18 0.79 0.11811 10 0.18 0.79 0.20311 11 0.18 0.79 0.07111 11 0.18 0.79 0.3111 12 0.18 0.79 0.05511 12 0.18 0.79 0.28812 1 0.17 0.79 0.067 12 1 0.17 0.79 0.06512 2 0.17 0.79 0.035 12 2 0.17 0.79 0.07912 3 0.17 0.79 0.034 12 3 0.17 0.79 0.05112 4 0.17 0.79 0.036 12 4 0.17 0.79 0.04112 5 0.17 0.79 0.062 12 5 0.17 0.79 0.0512 6 0.17 0.79 0.043 12 6 0.17 0.79 0.05212 7 0.17 0.79 0.042 12 7 0.17 0.79 0.06812 8 0.17 0.79 0.038 12 8 0.17 0.79 0.10312 9 0.17 0.79 0.076 12 9 0.17 0.79 0.09512 10 0.17 0.79 0.0812 10 0.17 0.79 0.03412 11 0.17 0.79 0.05712 11 0.17 0.79 0.07312 12 0.17 0.79 0.04512 12 0.17 0.79 0.055Enersys AirportEnersys SiteMonth Sector AlbedoBowenRatioSurface RoughnessLength Month Sector AlbedoBowenRatioSurface RoughnessLengthKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 15 of 731 1 0.17 0.79 0.067 1 1 0.17 0.78 0.181 2 0.17 0.79 0.035 1 2 0.17 0.78 0.0561 3 0.17 0.79 0.034 1 3 0.17 0.78 0.1431 4 0.17 0.79 0.036 1 4 0.17 0.78 0.0621 5 0.17 0.79 0.062 1 5 0.17 0.78 0.0961 6 0.17 0.79 0.043 1 6 0.17 0.78 0.1491 7 0.17 0.79 0.042 1 7 0.17 0.78 0.3141 8 0.17 0.79 0.038 1 8 0.17 0.78 0.291 9 0.17 0.79 0.076 1 9 0.17 0.78 0.5191 10 0.17 0.79 0.08 1 10 0.17 0.78 0.3791 11 0.17 0.79 0.057 1 11 0.17 0.78 0.411 12 0.17 0.79 0.045 1 12 0.17 0.78 0.242 1 0.17 0.79 0.067 2 1 0.17 0.78 0.182 2 0.17 0.79 0.035 2 2 0.17 0.78 0.0562 3 0.17 0.79 0.034 2 3 0.17 0.78 0.1432 4 0.17 0.79 0.036 2 4 0.17 0.78 0.0622 5 0.17 0.79 0.062 2 5 0.17 0.78 0.0962 6 0.17 0.79 0.043 2 6 0.17 0.78 0.1492 7 0.17 0.79 0.042 2 7 0.17 0.78 0.3142 8 0.17 0.79 0.038 2 8 0.17 0.78 0.292 9 0.17 0.79 0.076 2 9 0.17 0.78 0.5192 10 0.17 0.79 0.08 2 10 0.17 0.78 0.3792 11 0.17 0.79 0.057 2 11 0.17 0.78 0.412 12 0.17 0.79 0.045 2 12 0.17 0.78 0.243 1 0.15 0.41 0.075 3 1 0.14 0.42 0.2283 2 0.15 0.41 0.046 3 2 0.14 0.42 0.0753 3 0.15 0.41 0.047 3 3 0.14 0.42 0.1813 4 0.15 0.41 0.05 3 4 0.14 0.42 0.0833 5 0.15 0.41 0.089 3 5 0.14 0.42 0.1213 6 0.15 0.41 0.06 3 6 0.14 0.42 0.1833 7 0.15 0.41 0.057 3 7 0.14 0.42 0.355KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 16 of 733 8 0.15 0.41 0.048 3 8 0.14 0.42 0.3343 9 0.15 0.41 0.097 3 9 0.14 0.42 0.563 10 0.15 0.41 0.1 3 10 0.14 0.42 0.433 11 0.15 0.41 0.068 3 11 0.14 0.42 0.4723 12 0.15 0.41 0.051 3 12 0.14 0.42 0.2844 1 0.15 0.41 0.075 4 1 0.14 0.42 0.2284 2 0.15 0.41 0.046 4 2 0.14 0.42 0.0754 3 0.15 0.41 0.047 4 3 0.14 0.42 0.1814 4 0.15 0.41 0.05 4 4 0.14 0.42 0.0834 5 0.15 0.41 0.089 4 5 0.14 0.42 0.1214 6 0.15 0.41 0.06 4 6 0.14 0.42 0.1834 7 0.15 0.41 0.057 4 7 0.14 0.42 0.3554 8 0.15 0.41 0.048 4 8 0.14 0.42 0.3344 9 0.15 0.41 0.097 4 9 0.14 0.42 0.564 10 0.15 0.41 0.1 4 10 0.14 0.42 0.434 11 0.15 0.41 0.068 4 11 0.14 0.42 0.4724 12 0.15 0.41 0.051 4 12 0.14 0.42 0.2845 1 0.15 0.41 0.075 5 1 0.14 0.42 0.2285 2 0.15 0.41 0.046 5 2 0.14 0.42 0.0755 3 0.15 0.41 0.047 5 3 0.14 0.42 0.1815 4 0.15 0.41 0.05 5 4 0.14 0.42 0.0835 5 0.15 0.41 0.089 5 5 0.14 0.42 0.1215 6 0.15 0.41 0.06 5 6 0.14 0.42 0.1835 7 0.15 0.41 0.057 5 7 0.14 0.42 0.3555 8 0.15 0.41 0.048 5 8 0.14 0.42 0.3345 9 0.15 0.41 0.097 5 9 0.14 0.42 0.565 10 0.15 0.41 0.1 5 10 0.14 0.42 0.435 11 0.15 0.41 0.068 5 11 0.14 0.42 0.4725 12 0.15 0.41 0.051 5 12 0.14 0.42 0.2846 1 0.18 0.5 0.094 6 1 0.18 0.47 0.2766 2 0.18 0.5 0.117 6 2 0.18 0.47 0.112KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 17 of 736 3 0.18 0.5 0.138 6 3 0.18 0.47 0.3736 4 0.18 0.5 0.16 6 4 0.18 0.47 0.2376 5 0.18 0.5 0.242 6 5 0.18 0.47 0.2396 6 0.18 0.5 0.193 6 6 0.18 0.47 0.3566 7 0.18 0.5 0.107 6 7 0.18 0.47 0.416 8 0.18 0.5 0.077 6 8 0.18 0.47 0.3866 9 0.18 0.5 0.152 6 9 0.18 0.47 0.596 10 0.18 0.5 0.127 6 10 0.18 0.47 0.4696 11 0.18 0.5 0.076 6 11 0.18 0.47 0.5286 12 0.18 0.5 0.06 6 12 0.18 0.47 0.3257 1 0.18 0.5 0.094 7 1 0.18 0.47 0.2767 2 0.18 0.5 0.117 7 2 0.18 0.47 0.1127 3 0.18 0.5 0.138 7 3 0.18 0.47 0.3737 4 0.18 0.5 0.16 7 4 0.18 0.47 0.2377 5 0.18 0.5 0.242 7 5 0.18 0.47 0.2397 6 0.18 0.5 0.193 7 6 0.18 0.47 0.3567 7 0.18 0.5 0.107 7 7 0.18 0.47 0.417 8 0.18 0.5 0.077 7 8 0.18 0.47 0.3867 9 0.18 0.5 0.152 7 9 0.18 0.47 0.597 10 0.18 0.5 0.127 7 10 0.18 0.47 0.4697 11 0.18 0.5 0.076 7 11 0.18 0.47 0.5287 12 0.18 0.5 0.06 7 12 0.18 0.47 0.3258 1 0.18 0.5 0.094 8 1 0.18 0.47 0.2768 2 0.18 0.5 0.117 8 2 0.18 0.47 0.1128 3 0.18 0.5 0.138 8 3 0.18 0.47 0.3738 4 0.18 0.5 0.16 8 4 0.18 0.47 0.2378 5 0.18 0.5 0.242 8 5 0.18 0.47 0.2398 6 0.18 0.5 0.193 8 6 0.18 0.47 0.3568 7 0.18 0.5 0.107 8 7 0.18 0.47 0.418 8 0.18 0.5 0.077 8 8 0.18 0.47 0.3868 9 0.18 0.5 0.152 8 9 0.18 0.47 0.59KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 18 of 738 10 0.18 0.5 0.127 8 10 0.18 0.47 0.4698 11 0.18 0.5 0.076 8 11 0.18 0.47 0.5288 12 0.18 0.5 0.06 8 12 0.18 0.47 0.3259 1 0.18 0.79 0.091 9 1 0.18 0.78 0.2549 2 0.18 0.79 0.114 9 2 0.18 0.78 0.0989 3 0.18 0.79 0.134 9 3 0.18 0.78 0.3679 4 0.18 0.79 0.158 9 4 0.18 0.78 0.2339 5 0.18 0.79 0.239 9 5 0.18 0.78 0.2289 6 0.18 0.79 0.188 9 6 0.18 0.78 0.3489 7 0.18 0.79 0.097 9 7 0.18 0.78 0.399 8 0.18 0.79 0.069 9 8 0.18 0.78 0.3649 9 0.18 0.79 0.144 9 9 0.18 0.78 0.5749 10 0.18 0.79 0.118 9 10 0.18 0.78 0.4499 11 0.18 0.79 0.071 9 11 0.18 0.78 0.5119 12 0.18 0.79 0.055 9 12 0.18 0.78 0.30410 1 0.18 0.79 0.091 10 1 0.18 0.78 0.25410 2 0.18 0.79 0.114 10 2 0.18 0.78 0.09810 3 0.18 0.79 0.134 10 3 0.18 0.78 0.36710 4 0.18 0.79 0.158 10 4 0.18 0.78 0.23310 5 0.18 0.79 0.239 10 5 0.18 0.78 0.22810 6 0.18 0.79 0.188 10 6 0.18 0.78 0.34810 7 0.18 0.79 0.097 10 7 0.18 0.78 0.3910 8 0.18 0.79 0.069 10 8 0.18 0.78 0.36410 9 0.18 0.79 0.144 10 9 0.18 0.78 0.57410 10 0.18 0.79 0.118 10 10 0.18 0.78 0.44910 11 0.18 0.79 0.071 10 11 0.18 0.78 0.51110 12 0.18 0.79 0.055 10 12 0.18 0.78 0.30411 1 0.18 0.79 0.091 11 1 0.18 0.78 0.25411 2 0.18 0.79 0.114 11 2 0.18 0.78 0.09811 3 0.18 0.79 0.134 11 3 0.18 0.78 0.36711 4 0.18 0.79 0.158 11 4 0.18 0.78 0.233KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 19 of 7311 5 0.18 0.79 0.239 11 5 0.18 0.78 0.22811 6 0.18 0.79 0.188 11 6 0.18 0.78 0.34811 7 0.18 0.79 0.097 11 7 0.18 0.78 0.3911 8 0.18 0.79 0.069 11 8 0.18 0.78 0.36411 9 0.18 0.79 0.144 11 9 0.18 0.78 0.57411 10 0.18 0.79 0.118 11 10 0.18 0.78 0.44911 11 0.18 0.79 0.071 11 11 0.18 0.78 0.51111 12 0.18 0.79 0.055 11 12 0.18 0.78 0.30412 1 0.17 0.79 0.067 12 1 0.17 0.78 0.1812 2 0.17 0.79 0.035 12 2 0.17 0.78 0.05612 3 0.17 0.79 0.034 12 3 0.17 0.78 0.14312 4 0.17 0.79 0.036 12 4 0.17 0.78 0.06212 5 0.17 0.79 0.062 12 5 0.17 0.78 0.09612 6 0.17 0.79 0.043 12 6 0.17 0.78 0.14912 7 0.17 0.79 0.042 12 7 0.17 0.78 0.31412 8 0.17 0.79 0.038 12 8 0.17 0.78 0.2912 9 0.17 0.79 0.076 12 9 0.17 0.78 0.51912 10 0.17 0.79 0.08 12 10 0.17 0.78 0.37912 11 0.17 0.79 0.057 12 11 0.17 0.78 0.4112 12 0.17 0.79 0.045 12 12 0.17 0.78 0.24Big Sandy AirportBig Sandy SiteMonth Sector AlbedoBowenRatioSurface RoughnessLength Month Sector AlbedoBowenRatioSurface RoughnessLength1 1 0.16 0.82 0.232 1 1 0.17 0.93 0.1331 2 0.16 0.82 0.206 1 2 0.17 0.93 0.0281 3 0.16 0.82 0.299 1 3 0.17 0.93 0.0371 4 0.16 0.82 0.488 1 4 0.17 0.93 0.1191 5 0.16 0.82 0.372 1 5 0.17 0.93 0.1061 6 0.16 0.82 0.199 1 6 0.17 0.93 0.185KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 20 of 731 7 0.16 0.82 0.192 1 7 0.17 0.93 0.2831 8 0.16 0.82 0.044 1 8 0.17 0.93 0.2721 9 0.16 0.82 0.04 1 9 0.17 0.93 0.1651 10 0.16 0.82 0.06 1 10 0.17 0.93 0.2741 11 0.16 0.82 0.383 1 11 0.17 0.93 0.4021 12 0.16 0.82 0.303 1 12 0.17 0.93 0.2922 1 0.16 0.82 0.232 2 1 0.17 0.93 0.1332 2 0.16 0.82 0.206 2 2 0.17 0.93 0.0282 3 0.16 0.82 0.299 2 3 0.17 0.93 0.0372 4 0.16 0.82 0.488 2 4 0.17 0.93 0.1192 5 0.16 0.82 0.372 2 5 0.17 0.93 0.1062 6 0.16 0.82 0.199 2 6 0.17 0.93 0.1852 7 0.16 0.82 0.192 2 7 0.17 0.93 0.2832 8 0.16 0.82 0.044 2 8 0.17 0.93 0.2722 9 0.16 0.82 0.04 2 9 0.17 0.93 0.1652 10 0.16 0.82 0.06 2 10 0.17 0.93 0.2742 11 0.16 0.82 0.383 2 11 0.17 0.93 0.4022 12 0.16 0.82 0.303 2 12 0.17 0.93 0.2923 1 0.15 0.56 0.356 3 1 0.16 0.64 0.1823 2 0.15 0.56 0.311 3 2 0.16 0.64 0.0353 3 0.15 0.56 0.463 3 3 0.16 0.64 0.0483 4 0.15 0.56 0.772 3 4 0.16 0.64 0.1683 5 0.15 0.56 0.574 3 5 0.16 0.64 0.1523 6 0.15 0.56 0.279 3 6 0.16 0.64 0.2623 7 0.15 0.56 0.28 3 7 0.16 0.64 0.3943 8 0.15 0.56 0.062 3 8 0.16 0.64 0.3513 9 0.15 0.56 0.055 3 9 0.16 0.64 0.1813 10 0.15 0.56 0.079 3 10 0.16 0.64 0.3223 11 0.15 0.56 0.566 3 11 0.16 0.64 0.6263 12 0.15 0.56 0.451 3 12 0.16 0.64 0.444 1 0.15 0.56 0.356 4 1 0.16 0.64 0.182KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 21 of 734 2 0.15 0.56 0.311 4 2 0.16 0.64 0.0354 3 0.15 0.56 0.463 4 3 0.16 0.64 0.0484 4 0.15 0.56 0.772 4 4 0.16 0.64 0.1684 5 0.15 0.56 0.574 4 5 0.16 0.64 0.1524 6 0.15 0.56 0.279 4 6 0.16 0.64 0.2624 7 0.15 0.56 0.28 4 7 0.16 0.64 0.3944 8 0.15 0.56 0.062 4 8 0.16 0.64 0.3514 9 0.15 0.56 0.055 4 9 0.16 0.64 0.1814 10 0.15 0.56 0.079 4 10 0.16 0.64 0.3224 11 0.15 0.56 0.566 4 11 0.16 0.64 0.6264 12 0.15 0.56 0.451 4 12 0.16 0.64 0.445 1 0.15 0.56 0.356 5 1 0.16 0.64 0.1825 2 0.15 0.56 0.311 5 2 0.16 0.64 0.0355 3 0.15 0.56 0.463 5 3 0.16 0.64 0.0485 4 0.15 0.56 0.772 5 4 0.16 0.64 0.1685 5 0.15 0.56 0.574 5 5 0.16 0.64 0.1525 6 0.15 0.56 0.279 5 6 0.16 0.64 0.2625 7 0.15 0.56 0.28 5 7 0.16 0.64 0.3945 8 0.15 0.56 0.062 5 8 0.16 0.64 0.3515 9 0.15 0.56 0.055 5 9 0.16 0.64 0.1815 10 0.15 0.56 0.079 5 10 0.16 0.64 0.3225 11 0.15 0.56 0.566 5 11 0.16 0.64 0.6265 12 0.15 0.56 0.451 5 12 0.16 0.64 0.446 1 0.16 0.39 0.684 6 1 0.16 0.32 0.2226 2 0.16 0.39 0.642 6 2 0.16 0.32 0.0396 3 0.16 0.39 0.803 6 3 0.16 0.32 0.0556 4 0.16 0.39 1.096 6 4 0.16 0.32 0.2016 5 0.16 0.39 0.86 6 5 0.16 0.32 0.2016 6 0.16 0.39 0.447 6 6 0.16 0.32 0.3316 7 0.16 0.39 0.434 6 7 0.16 0.32 0.5276 8 0.16 0.39 0.12 6 8 0.16 0.32 0.416KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 22 of 736 9 0.16 0.39 0.115 6 9 0.16 0.32 0.1926 10 0.16 0.39 0.123 6 10 0.16 0.32 0.3786 11 0.16 0.39 0.742 6 11 0.16 0.32 0.8346 12 0.16 0.39 0.714 6 12 0.16 0.32 0.5757 1 0.16 0.39 0.684 7 1 0.16 0.32 0.2227 2 0.16 0.39 0.642 7 2 0.16 0.32 0.0397 3 0.16 0.39 0.803 7 3 0.16 0.32 0.0557 4 0.16 0.39 1.096 7 4 0.16 0.32 0.2017 5 0.16 0.39 0.86 7 5 0.16 0.32 0.2017 6 0.16 0.39 0.447 7 6 0.16 0.32 0.3317 7 0.16 0.39 0.434 7 7 0.16 0.32 0.5277 8 0.16 0.39 0.12 7 8 0.16 0.32 0.4167 9 0.16 0.39 0.115 7 9 0.16 0.32 0.1927 10 0.16 0.39 0.123 7 10 0.16 0.32 0.3787 11 0.16 0.39 0.742 7 11 0.16 0.32 0.8347 12 0.16 0.39 0.714 7 12 0.16 0.32 0.5758 1 0.16 0.39 0.684 8 1 0.16 0.32 0.2228 2 0.16 0.39 0.642 8 2 0.16 0.32 0.0398 3 0.16 0.39 0.803 8 3 0.16 0.32 0.0558 4 0.16 0.39 1.096 8 4 0.16 0.32 0.2018 5 0.16 0.39 0.86 8 5 0.16 0.32 0.2018 6 0.16 0.39 0.447 8 6 0.16 0.32 0.3318 7 0.16 0.39 0.434 8 7 0.16 0.32 0.5278 8 0.16 0.39 0.12 8 8 0.16 0.32 0.4168 9 0.16 0.39 0.115 8 9 0.16 0.32 0.1928 10 0.16 0.39 0.123 8 10 0.16 0.32 0.3788 11 0.16 0.39 0.742 8 11 0.16 0.32 0.8348 12 0.16 0.39 0.714 8 12 0.16 0.32 0.5759 1 0.16 0.82 0.684 9 1 0.16 0.93 0.2219 2 0.16 0.82 0.642 9 2 0.16 0.93 0.0399 3 0.16 0.82 0.803 9 3 0.16 0.93 0.055KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 23 of 739 4 0.16 0.82 1.096 9 4 0.16 0.93 0.2019 5 0.16 0.82 0.86 9 5 0.16 0.93 0.2019 6 0.16 0.82 0.443 9 6 0.16 0.93 0.3319 7 0.16 0.82 0.42 9 7 0.16 0.93 0.5279 8 0.16 0.82 0.111 9 8 0.16 0.93 0.4159 9 0.16 0.82 0.107 9 9 0.16 0.93 0.1919 10 0.16 0.82 0.115 9 10 0.16 0.93 0.3789 11 0.16 0.82 0.735 9 11 0.16 0.93 0.8349 12 0.16 0.82 0.714 9 12 0.16 0.93 0.56910 1 0.16 0.82 0.684 10 1 0.16 0.93 0.22110 2 0.16 0.82 0.642 10 2 0.16 0.93 0.03910 3 0.16 0.82 0.803 10 3 0.16 0.93 0.05510 4 0.16 0.82 1.096 10 4 0.16 0.93 0.20110 5 0.16 0.82 0.86 10 5 0.16 0.93 0.20110 6 0.16 0.82 0.443 10 6 0.16 0.93 0.33110 7 0.16 0.82 0.42 10 7 0.16 0.93 0.52710 8 0.16 0.82 0.111 10 8 0.16 0.93 0.41510 9 0.16 0.82 0.107 10 9 0.16 0.93 0.19110 10 0.16 0.82 0.115 10 10 0.16 0.93 0.37810 11 0.16 0.82 0.735 10 11 0.16 0.93 0.83410 12 0.16 0.82 0.714 10 12 0.16 0.93 0.56911 1 0.16 0.82 0.684 11 1 0.16 0.93 0.22111 2 0.16 0.82 0.642 11 2 0.16 0.93 0.03911 3 0.16 0.82 0.803 11 3 0.16 0.93 0.05511 4 0.16 0.82 1.096 11 4 0.16 0.93 0.20111 5 0.16 0.82 0.86 11 5 0.16 0.93 0.20111 6 0.16 0.82 0.443 11 6 0.16 0.93 0.33111 7 0.16 0.82 0.42 11 7 0.16 0.93 0.52711 8 0.16 0.82 0.111 11 8 0.16 0.93 0.41511 9 0.16 0.82 0.107 11 9 0.16 0.93 0.19111 10 0.16 0.82 0.115 11 10 0.16 0.93 0.378KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 24 of 7311 11 0.16 0.82 0.735 11 11 0.16 0.93 0.83411 12 0.16 0.82 0.714 11 12 0.16 0.93 0.56912 1 0.16 0.82 0.232 12 1 0.17 0.93 0.13312 2 0.16 0.82 0.206 12 2 0.17 0.93 0.02812 3 0.16 0.82 0.299 12 3 0.17 0.93 0.03712 4 0.16 0.82 0.488 12 4 0.17 0.93 0.11912 5 0.16 0.82 0.372 12 5 0.17 0.93 0.10612 6 0.16 0.82 0.199 12 6 0.17 0.93 0.18512 7 0.16 0.82 0.192 12 7 0.17 0.93 0.28312 8 0.16 0.82 0.044 12 8 0.17 0.93 0.27212 9 0.16 0.82 0.04 12 9 0.17 0.93 0.16512 10 0.16 0.82 0.06 12 10 0.17 0.93 0.27412 11 0.16 0.82 0.383 12 11 0.17 0.93 0.40212 12 0.16 0.82 0.303 12 12 0.17 0.93 0.292Calgon Carbon AirportCalgon Carbon SurfaceMonth Sector AlbedoBowenRatioSurface RoughnessLength Month Sector AlbedoBowenRatioSurface RoughnessLength1 1 0.16 0.82 0.23 1 1 0.17 0.91 0.1661 2 0.16 0.82 0.208 1 2 0.17 0.91 0.1891 3 0.16 0.82 0.293 1 3 0.17 0.91 0.0971 4 0.16 0.82 0.488 1 4 0.17 0.91 0.0171 5 0.16 0.82 0.373 1 5 0.17 0.91 0.0581 6 0.16 0.82 0.198 1 6 0.17 0.91 0.6891 7 0.16 0.82 0.195 1 7 0.17 0.91 0.2041 8 0.16 0.82 0.041 1 8 0.17 0.91 0.5571 9 0.16 0.82 0.043 1 9 0.17 0.91 0.2791 10 0.16 0.82 0.055 1 10 0.17 0.91 0.4891 11 0.16 0.82 0.383 1 11 0.17 0.91 0.0481 12 0.16 0.82 0.294 1 12 0.17 0.91 0.146KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 25 of 732 1 0.16 0.82 0.23 2 1 0.17 0.91 0.1662 2 0.16 0.82 0.208 2 2 0.17 0.91 0.1892 3 0.16 0.82 0.293 2 3 0.17 0.91 0.0972 4 0.16 0.82 0.488 2 4 0.17 0.91 0.0172 5 0.16 0.82 0.373 2 5 0.17 0.91 0.0582 6 0.16 0.82 0.198 2 6 0.17 0.91 0.6892 7 0.16 0.82 0.195 2 7 0.17 0.91 0.2042 8 0.16 0.82 0.041 2 8 0.17 0.91 0.5572 9 0.16 0.82 0.043 2 9 0.17 0.91 0.2792 10 0.16 0.82 0.055 2 10 0.17 0.91 0.4892 11 0.16 0.82 0.383 2 11 0.17 0.91 0.0482 12 0.16 0.82 0.294 2 12 0.17 0.91 0.1463 1 0.15 0.56 0.352 3 1 0.15 0.61 0.2163 2 0.15 0.56 0.317 3 2 0.15 0.61 0.2623 3 0.15 0.56 0.452 3 3 0.15 0.61 0.1263 4 0.15 0.56 0.773 3 4 0.15 0.61 0.0193 5 0.15 0.56 0.575 3 5 0.15 0.61 0.0623 6 0.15 0.56 0.278 3 6 0.15 0.61 0.8773 7 0.15 0.56 0.284 3 7 0.15 0.61 0.2763 8 0.15 0.56 0.058 3 8 0.15 0.61 0.8553 9 0.15 0.56 0.06 3 9 0.15 0.61 0.4073 10 0.15 0.56 0.071 3 10 0.15 0.61 0.7363 11 0.15 0.56 0.565 3 11 0.15 0.61 0.0633 12 0.15 0.56 0.436 3 12 0.15 0.61 0.1784 1 0.15 0.56 0.352 4 1 0.15 0.61 0.2164 2 0.15 0.56 0.317 4 2 0.15 0.61 0.2624 3 0.15 0.56 0.452 4 3 0.15 0.61 0.1264 4 0.15 0.56 0.773 4 4 0.15 0.61 0.0194 5 0.15 0.56 0.575 4 5 0.15 0.61 0.0624 6 0.15 0.56 0.278 4 6 0.15 0.61 0.8774 7 0.15 0.56 0.284 4 7 0.15 0.61 0.276KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 26 of 734 8 0.15 0.56 0.058 4 8 0.15 0.61 0.8554 9 0.15 0.56 0.06 4 9 0.15 0.61 0.4074 10 0.15 0.56 0.071 4 10 0.15 0.61 0.7364 11 0.15 0.56 0.565 4 11 0.15 0.61 0.0634 12 0.15 0.56 0.436 4 12 0.15 0.61 0.1785 1 0.15 0.56 0.352 5 1 0.15 0.61 0.2165 2 0.15 0.56 0.317 5 2 0.15 0.61 0.2625 3 0.15 0.56 0.452 5 3 0.15 0.61 0.1265 4 0.15 0.56 0.773 5 4 0.15 0.61 0.0195 5 0.15 0.56 0.575 5 5 0.15 0.61 0.0625 6 0.15 0.56 0.278 5 6 0.15 0.61 0.8775 7 0.15 0.56 0.284 5 7 0.15 0.61 0.2765 8 0.15 0.56 0.058 5 8 0.15 0.61 0.8555 9 0.15 0.56 0.06 5 9 0.15 0.61 0.4075 10 0.15 0.56 0.071 5 10 0.15 0.61 0.7365 11 0.15 0.56 0.565 5 11 0.15 0.61 0.0635 12 0.15 0.56 0.436 5 12 0.15 0.61 0.1786 1 0.16 0.39 0.68 6 1 0.16 0.35 0.2616 2 0.16 0.39 0.65 6 2 0.16 0.35 0.3126 3 0.16 0.39 0.791 6 3 0.16 0.35 0.1596 4 0.16 0.39 1.096 6 4 0.16 0.35 0.0236 5 0.16 0.39 0.857 6 5 0.16 0.35 0.0656 6 0.16 0.39 0.447 6 6 0.16 0.35 1.0036 7 0.16 0.39 0.44 6 7 0.16 0.35 0.3276 8 0.16 0.39 0.116 6 8 0.16 0.35 1.1236 9 0.16 0.39 0.12 6 9 0.16 0.35 0.6186 10 0.16 0.39 0.115 6 10 0.16 0.35 1.0426 11 0.16 0.39 0.738 6 11 0.16 0.35 0.0766 12 0.16 0.39 0.695 6 12 0.16 0.35 0.2477 1 0.16 0.39 0.68 7 1 0.16 0.35 0.2617 2 0.16 0.39 0.65 7 2 0.16 0.35 0.312KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 27 of 737 3 0.16 0.39 0.791 7 3 0.16 0.35 0.1597 4 0.16 0.39 1.096 7 4 0.16 0.35 0.0237 5 0.16 0.39 0.857 7 5 0.16 0.35 0.0657 6 0.16 0.39 0.447 7 6 0.16 0.35 1.0037 7 0.16 0.39 0.44 7 7 0.16 0.35 0.3277 8 0.16 0.39 0.116 7 8 0.16 0.35 1.1237 9 0.16 0.39 0.12 7 9 0.16 0.35 0.6187 10 0.16 0.39 0.115 7 10 0.16 0.35 1.0427 11 0.16 0.39 0.738 7 11 0.16 0.35 0.0767 12 0.16 0.39 0.695 7 12 0.16 0.35 0.2478 1 0.16 0.39 0.68 8 1 0.16 0.35 0.2618 2 0.16 0.39 0.65 8 2 0.16 0.35 0.3128 3 0.16 0.39 0.791 8 3 0.16 0.35 0.1598 4 0.16 0.39 1.096 8 4 0.16 0.35 0.0238 5 0.16 0.39 0.857 8 5 0.16 0.35 0.0658 6 0.16 0.39 0.447 8 6 0.16 0.35 1.0038 7 0.16 0.39 0.44 8 7 0.16 0.35 0.3278 8 0.16 0.39 0.116 8 8 0.16 0.35 1.1238 9 0.16 0.39 0.12 8 9 0.16 0.35 0.6188 10 0.16 0.39 0.115 8 10 0.16 0.35 1.0428 11 0.16 0.39 0.738 8 11 0.16 0.35 0.0768 12 0.16 0.39 0.695 8 12 0.16 0.35 0.2479 1 0.16 0.82 0.68 9 1 0.16 0.91 0.2619 2 0.16 0.82 0.65 9 2 0.16 0.91 0.3129 3 0.16 0.82 0.791 9 3 0.16 0.91 0.1599 4 0.16 0.82 1.096 9 4 0.16 0.91 0.0239 5 0.16 0.82 0.857 9 5 0.16 0.91 0.0659 6 0.16 0.82 0.443 9 6 0.16 0.91 1.0039 7 0.16 0.82 0.427 9 7 0.16 0.91 0.3279 8 0.16 0.82 0.107 9 8 0.16 0.91 1.1239 9 0.16 0.82 0.112 9 9 0.16 0.91 0.618KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 28 of 739 10 0.16 0.82 0.107 9 10 0.16 0.91 1.0429 11 0.16 0.82 0.731 9 11 0.16 0.91 0.0769 12 0.16 0.82 0.695 9 12 0.16 0.91 0.24710 1 0.16 0.82 0.68 10 1 0.16 0.91 0.26110 2 0.16 0.82 0.65 10 2 0.16 0.91 0.31210 3 0.16 0.82 0.791 10 3 0.16 0.91 0.15910 4 0.16 0.82 1.096 10 4 0.16 0.91 0.02310 5 0.16 0.82 0.857 10 5 0.16 0.91 0.06510 6 0.16 0.82 0.443 10 6 0.16 0.91 1.00310 7 0.16 0.82 0.427 10 7 0.16 0.91 0.32710 8 0.16 0.82 0.107 10 8 0.16 0.91 1.12310 9 0.16 0.82 0.112 10 9 0.16 0.91 0.61810 10 0.16 0.82 0.107 10 10 0.16 0.91 1.04210 11 0.16 0.82 0.731 10 11 0.16 0.91 0.07610 12 0.16 0.82 0.695 10 12 0.16 0.91 0.24711 1 0.16 0.82 0.68 11 1 0.16 0.91 0.26111 2 0.16 0.82 0.65 11 2 0.16 0.91 0.31211 3 0.16 0.82 0.791 11 3 0.16 0.91 0.15911 4 0.16 0.82 1.096 11 4 0.16 0.91 0.02311 5 0.16 0.82 0.857 11 5 0.16 0.91 0.06511 6 0.16 0.82 0.443 11 6 0.16 0.91 1.00311 7 0.16 0.82 0.427 11 7 0.16 0.91 0.32711 8 0.16 0.82 0.107 11 8 0.16 0.91 1.12311 9 0.16 0.82 0.112 11 9 0.16 0.91 0.61811 10 0.16 0.82 0.107 11 10 0.16 0.91 1.04211 11 0.16 0.82 0.731 11 11 0.16 0.91 0.07611 12 0.16 0.82 0.695 11 12 0.16 0.91 0.24712 1 0.16 0.82 0.23 12 1 0.17 0.91 0.16612 2 0.16 0.82 0.208 12 2 0.17 0.91 0.18912 3 0.16 0.82 0.293 12 3 0.17 0.91 0.09712 4 0.16 0.82 0.488 12 4 0.17 0.91 0.017KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 29 of 7312 5 0.16 0.82 0.373 12 5 0.17 0.91 0.05812 6 0.16 0.82 0.198 12 6 0.17 0.91 0.68912 7 0.16 0.82 0.195 12 7 0.17 0.91 0.20412 8 0.16 0.82 0.041 12 8 0.17 0.91 0.55712 9 0.16 0.82 0.043 12 9 0.17 0.91 0.27912 10 0.16 0.82 0.055 12 10 0.17 0.91 0.48912 11 0.16 0.82 0.383 12 11 0.17 0.91 0.04812 12 0.16 0.82 0.294 12 12 0.17 0.91 0.146Newpage AirportNewpage SiteMonth Sector Albedo Bowen RatioSurface RoughnessLength Month Sector AlbedoBowenRatioSurface RoughnessLength1 1 0.17 0.72 0.04 1 1 0.16 0.49 0.4921 2 0.17 0.72 0.054 1 2 0.16 0.49 0.5071 3 0.17 0.72 0.037 1 3 0.16 0.49 0.6241 4 0.17 0.72 0.026 1 4 0.16 0.49 0.4221 5 0.17 0.72 0.022 1 5 0.16 0.49 0.2111 6 0.17 0.72 0.022 1 6 0.16 0.49 0.3421 7 0.17 0.72 0.02 1 7 0.16 0.49 0.3851 8 0.17 0.72 0.014 1 8 0.16 0.49 0.1151 9 0.17 0.72 0.017 1 9 0.16 0.49 0.2851 10 0.17 0.72 0.021 1 10 0.16 0.49 0.5361 11 0.17 0.72 0.024 1 11 0.16 0.49 0.4751 12 0.17 0.72 0.028 1 12 0.16 0.49 0.3542 1 0.17 0.72 0.04 2 1 0.16 0.49 0.4922 2 0.17 0.72 0.054 2 2 0.16 0.49 0.5072 3 0.17 0.72 0.037 2 3 0.16 0.49 0.6242 4 0.17 0.72 0.026 2 4 0.16 0.49 0.4222 5 0.17 0.72 0.022 2 5 0.16 0.49 0.211KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 30 of 732 6 0.17 0.72 0.022 2 6 0.16 0.49 0.3422 7 0.17 0.72 0.02 2 7 0.16 0.49 0.3852 8 0.17 0.72 0.014 2 8 0.16 0.49 0.1152 9 0.17 0.72 0.017 2 9 0.16 0.49 0.2852 10 0.17 0.72 0.021 2 10 0.16 0.49 0.5362 11 0.17 0.72 0.024 2 11 0.16 0.49 0.4752 12 0.17 0.72 0.028 2 12 0.16 0.49 0.3543 1 0.14 0.36 0.057 3 1 0.14 0.29 0.6843 2 0.14 0.36 0.076 3 2 0.14 0.29 0.6913 3 0.14 0.36 0.053 3 3 0.14 0.29 0.7913 4 0.14 0.36 0.038 3 4 0.14 0.29 0.4463 5 0.14 0.36 0.032 3 5 0.14 0.29 0.2553 6 0.14 0.36 0.03 3 6 0.14 0.29 0.4033 7 0.14 0.36 0.027 3 7 0.14 0.29 0.4423 8 0.14 0.36 0.021 3 8 0.14 0.29 0.1413 9 0.14 0.36 0.025 3 9 0.14 0.29 0.3223 10 0.14 0.36 0.031 3 10 0.14 0.29 0.623 11 0.14 0.36 0.036 3 11 0.14 0.29 0.6223 12 0.14 0.36 0.042 3 12 0.14 0.29 0.4714 1 0.14 0.36 0.057 4 1 0.14 0.29 0.6844 2 0.14 0.36 0.076 4 2 0.14 0.29 0.6914 3 0.14 0.36 0.053 4 3 0.14 0.29 0.7914 4 0.14 0.36 0.038 4 4 0.14 0.29 0.4464 5 0.14 0.36 0.032 4 5 0.14 0.29 0.2554 6 0.14 0.36 0.03 4 6 0.14 0.29 0.4034 7 0.14 0.36 0.027 4 7 0.14 0.29 0.4424 8 0.14 0.36 0.021 4 8 0.14 0.29 0.1414 9 0.14 0.36 0.025 4 9 0.14 0.29 0.3224 10 0.14 0.36 0.031 4 10 0.14 0.29 0.624 11 0.14 0.36 0.036 4 11 0.14 0.29 0.6224 12 0.14 0.36 0.042 4 12 0.14 0.29 0.471KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 31 of 735 1 0.14 0.36 0.057 5 1 0.14 0.29 0.6845 2 0.14 0.36 0.076 5 2 0.14 0.29 0.6915 3 0.14 0.36 0.053 5 3 0.14 0.29 0.7915 4 0.14 0.36 0.038 5 4 0.14 0.29 0.4465 5 0.14 0.36 0.032 5 5 0.14 0.29 0.2555 6 0.14 0.36 0.03 5 6 0.14 0.29 0.4035 7 0.14 0.36 0.027 5 7 0.14 0.29 0.4425 8 0.14 0.36 0.021 5 8 0.14 0.29 0.1415 9 0.14 0.36 0.025 5 9 0.14 0.29 0.3225 10 0.14 0.36 0.031 5 10 0.14 0.29 0.625 11 0.14 0.36 0.036 5 11 0.14 0.29 0.6225 12 0.14 0.36 0.042 5 12 0.14 0.29 0.4716 1 0.19 0.45 0.239 6 1 0.17 0.32 0.9296 2 0.19 0.45 0.234 6 2 0.17 0.32 0.9236 3 0.19 0.45 0.189 6 3 0.17 0.32 0.9256 4 0.19 0.45 0.168 6 4 0.17 0.32 0.4756 5 0.19 0.45 0.118 6 5 0.17 0.32 0.4486 6 0.19 0.45 0.059 6 6 0.17 0.32 0.5726 7 0.19 0.45 0.033 6 7 0.17 0.32 0.5746 8 0.19 0.45 0.028 6 8 0.17 0.32 0.2216 9 0.19 0.45 0.041 6 9 0.17 0.32 0.56 10 0.19 0.45 0.098 6 10 0.17 0.32 0.7396 11 0.19 0.45 0.18 6 11 0.17 0.32 0.8366 12 0.19 0.45 0.163 6 12 0.17 0.32 0.7347 1 0.19 0.45 0.239 7 1 0.17 0.32 0.9297 2 0.19 0.45 0.234 7 2 0.17 0.32 0.9237 3 0.19 0.45 0.189 7 3 0.17 0.32 0.9257 4 0.19 0.45 0.168 7 4 0.17 0.32 0.4757 5 0.19 0.45 0.118 7 5 0.17 0.32 0.4487 6 0.19 0.45 0.059 7 6 0.17 0.32 0.5727 7 0.19 0.45 0.033 7 7 0.17 0.32 0.574KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 32 of 737 8 0.19 0.45 0.028 7 8 0.17 0.32 0.2217 9 0.19 0.45 0.041 7 9 0.17 0.32 0.57 10 0.19 0.45 0.098 7 10 0.17 0.32 0.7397 11 0.19 0.45 0.18 7 11 0.17 0.32 0.8367 12 0.19 0.45 0.163 7 12 0.17 0.32 0.7348 1 0.19 0.45 0.239 8 1 0.17 0.32 0.9298 2 0.19 0.45 0.234 8 2 0.17 0.32 0.9238 3 0.19 0.45 0.189 8 3 0.17 0.32 0.9258 4 0.19 0.45 0.168 8 4 0.17 0.32 0.4758 5 0.19 0.45 0.118 8 5 0.17 0.32 0.4488 6 0.19 0.45 0.059 8 6 0.17 0.32 0.5728 7 0.19 0.45 0.033 8 7 0.17 0.32 0.5748 8 0.19 0.45 0.028 8 8 0.17 0.32 0.2218 9 0.19 0.45 0.041 8 9 0.17 0.32 0.58 10 0.19 0.45 0.098 8 10 0.17 0.32 0.7398 11 0.19 0.45 0.18 8 11 0.17 0.32 0.8368 12 0.19 0.45 0.163 8 12 0.17 0.32 0.7349 1 0.19 0.71 0.239 9 1 0.17 0.46 0.9299 2 0.19 0.71 0.231 9 2 0.17 0.46 0.9239 3 0.19 0.71 0.187 9 3 0.17 0.46 0.9259 4 0.19 0.71 0.166 9 4 0.17 0.46 0.4759 5 0.19 0.71 0.111 9 5 0.17 0.46 0.4489 6 0.19 0.71 0.052 9 6 0.17 0.46 0.5729 7 0.19 0.71 0.027 9 7 0.17 0.46 0.579 8 0.19 0.71 0.022 9 8 0.17 0.46 0.2119 9 0.19 0.71 0.034 9 9 0.17 0.46 0.4949 10 0.19 0.71 0.091 9 10 0.17 0.46 0.7389 11 0.19 0.71 0.18 9 11 0.17 0.46 0.8369 12 0.19 0.71 0.157 9 12 0.17 0.46 0.73410 1 0.19 0.71 0.239 10 1 0.17 0.46 0.92910 2 0.19 0.71 0.231 10 2 0.17 0.46 0.923KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 33 of 7310 3 0.19 0.71 0.187 10 3 0.17 0.46 0.92510 4 0.19 0.71 0.166 10 4 0.17 0.46 0.47510 5 0.19 0.71 0.111 10 5 0.17 0.46 0.44810 6 0.19 0.71 0.052 10 6 0.17 0.46 0.57210 7 0.19 0.71 0.027 10 7 0.17 0.46 0.5710 8 0.19 0.71 0.022 10 8 0.17 0.46 0.21110 9 0.19 0.71 0.034 10 9 0.17 0.46 0.49410 10 0.19 0.71 0.091 10 10 0.17 0.46 0.73810 11 0.19 0.71 0.18 10 11 0.17 0.46 0.83610 12 0.19 0.71 0.157 10 12 0.17 0.46 0.73411 1 0.19 0.71 0.239 11 1 0.17 0.46 0.92911 2 0.19 0.71 0.231 11 2 0.17 0.46 0.92311 3 0.19 0.71 0.187 11 3 0.17 0.46 0.92511 4 0.19 0.71 0.166 11 4 0.17 0.46 0.47511 5 0.19 0.71 0.111 11 5 0.17 0.46 0.44811 6 0.19 0.71 0.052 11 6 0.17 0.46 0.57211 7 0.19 0.71 0.027 11 7 0.17 0.46 0.5711 8 0.19 0.71 0.022 11 8 0.17 0.46 0.21111 9 0.19 0.71 0.034 11 9 0.17 0.46 0.49411 10 0.19 0.71 0.091 11 10 0.17 0.46 0.73811 11 0.19 0.71 0.18 11 11 0.17 0.46 0.83611 12 0.19 0.71 0.157 11 12 0.17 0.46 0.73412 1 0.17 0.72 0.04 12 1 0.16 0.49 0.49212 2 0.17 0.72 0.054 12 2 0.16 0.49 0.50712 3 0.17 0.72 0.037 12 3 0.16 0.49 0.62412 4 0.17 0.72 0.026 12 4 0.16 0.49 0.42212 5 0.17 0.72 0.022 12 5 0.16 0.49 0.21112 6 0.17 0.72 0.022 12 6 0.16 0.49 0.34212 7 0.17 0.72 0.02 12 7 0.16 0.49 0.38512 8 0.17 0.72 0.014 12 8 0.16 0.49 0.11512 9 0.17 0.72 0.017 12 9 0.16 0.49 0.285KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 34 of 7312 10 0.17 0.72 0.021 12 10 0.16 0.49 0.53612 11 0.17 0.72 0.024 12 11 0.16 0.49 0.47512 12 0.17 0.72 0.028 12 12 0.16 0.49 0.354TVA Shawnee AirportTVA Shawnee SiteMonth Sector Albedo Bowen RatioSurface RoughnessLengthMonth Sector AlbedoBowenRatioSurfaceRoughness Length1 1 0.17 0.72 0.04 1 1 0.16 0.53 0.0481 2 0.17 0.72 0.054 1 2 0.16 0.53 0.0091 3 0.17 0.72 0.037 1 3 0.16 0.53 0.0361 4 0.17 0.72 0.026 1 4 0.16 0.53 0.1091 5 0.17 0.72 0.022 1 5 0.16 0.53 0.181 6 0.17 0.72 0.022 1 6 0.16 0.53 0.1231 7 0.17 0.72 0.02 1 7 0.16 0.53 0.181 8 0.17 0.72 0.014 1 8 0.16 0.53 0.161 9 0.17 0.72 0.017 1 9 0.16 0.53 0.0451 10 0.17 0.72 0.021 1 10 0.16 0.53 0.0091 11 0.17 0.72 0.024 1 11 0.16 0.53 0.0541 12 0.17 0.72 0.028 1 12 0.16 0.53 0.0852 1 0.17 0.72 0.04 2 1 0.16 0.53 0.0482 2 0.17 0.72 0.054 2 2 0.16 0.53 0.0092 3 0.17 0.72 0.037 2 3 0.16 0.53 0.0362 4 0.17 0.72 0.026 2 4 0.16 0.53 0.1092 5 0.17 0.72 0.022 2 5 0.16 0.53 0.182 6 0.17 0.72 0.022 2 6 0.16 0.53 0.1232 7 0.17 0.72 0.02 2 7 0.16 0.53 0.182 8 0.17 0.72 0.014 2 8 0.16 0.53 0.162 9 0.17 0.72 0.017 2 9 0.16 0.53 0.0452 10 0.17 0.72 0.021 2 10 0.16 0.53 0.0092 11 0.17 0.72 0.024 2 11 0.16 0.53 0.0542 12 0.17 0.72 0.028 2 12 0.16 0.53 0.085KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 35 of 733 1 0.14 0.36 0.057 3 1 0.14 0.31 0.0563 2 0.14 0.36 0.076 3 2 0.14 0.31 0.013 3 0.14 0.36 0.053 3 3 0.14 0.31 0.0413 4 0.14 0.36 0.038 3 4 0.14 0.31 0.1293 5 0.14 0.36 0.032 3 5 0.14 0.31 0.2423 6 0.14 0.36 0.03 3 6 0.14 0.31 0.1483 7 0.14 0.36 0.027 3 7 0.14 0.31 0.1993 8 0.14 0.36 0.021 3 8 0.14 0.31 0.1863 9 0.14 0.36 0.025 3 9 0.14 0.31 0.0483 10 0.14 0.36 0.031 3 10 0.14 0.31 0.0093 11 0.14 0.36 0.036 3 11 0.14 0.31 0.0593 12 0.14 0.36 0.042 3 12 0.14 0.31 0.0974 1 0.14 0.36 0.057 4 1 0.14 0.31 0.0564 2 0.14 0.36 0.076 4 2 0.14 0.31 0.014 3 0.14 0.36 0.053 4 3 0.14 0.31 0.0414 4 0.14 0.36 0.038 4 4 0.14 0.31 0.1294 5 0.14 0.36 0.032 4 5 0.14 0.31 0.2424 6 0.14 0.36 0.03 4 6 0.14 0.31 0.1484 7 0.14 0.36 0.027 4 7 0.14 0.31 0.1994 8 0.14 0.36 0.021 4 8 0.14 0.31 0.1864 9 0.14 0.36 0.025 4 9 0.14 0.31 0.0484 10 0.14 0.36 0.031 4 10 0.14 0.31 0.0094 11 0.14 0.36 0.036 4 11 0.14 0.31 0.0594 12 0.14 0.36 0.042 4 12 0.14 0.31 0.0975 1 0.14 0.36 0.057 5 1 0.14 0.31 0.0565 2 0.14 0.36 0.076 5 2 0.14 0.31 0.015 3 0.14 0.36 0.053 5 3 0.14 0.31 0.0415 4 0.14 0.36 0.038 5 4 0.14 0.31 0.1295 5 0.14 0.36 0.032 5 5 0.14 0.31 0.2425 6 0.14 0.36 0.03 5 6 0.14 0.31 0.1485 7 0.14 0.36 0.027 5 7 0.14 0.31 0.199KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 36 of 735 8 0.14 0.36 0.021 5 8 0.14 0.31 0.1865 9 0.14 0.36 0.025 5 9 0.14 0.31 0.0485 10 0.14 0.36 0.031 5 10 0.14 0.31 0.0095 11 0.14 0.36 0.036 5 11 0.14 0.31 0.0595 12 0.14 0.36 0.042 5 12 0.14 0.31 0.0976 1 0.19 0.45 0.239 6 1 0.17 0.35 0.0626 2 0.19 0.45 0.234 6 2 0.17 0.35 0.0116 3 0.19 0.45 0.189 6 3 0.17 0.35 0.0546 4 0.19 0.45 0.168 6 4 0.17 0.35 0.1726 5 0.19 0.45 0.118 6 5 0.17 0.35 0.3826 6 0.19 0.45 0.059 6 6 0.17 0.35 0.2756 7 0.19 0.45 0.033 6 7 0.17 0.35 0.2816 8 0.19 0.45 0.028 6 8 0.17 0.35 0.2776 9 0.19 0.45 0.041 6 9 0.17 0.35 0.0596 10 0.19 0.45 0.098 6 10 0.17 0.35 0.0096 11 0.19 0.45 0.18 6 11 0.17 0.35 0.0696 12 0.19 0.45 0.163 6 12 0.17 0.35 0.1087 1 0.19 0.45 0.239 7 1 0.17 0.35 0.0627 2 0.19 0.45 0.234 7 2 0.17 0.35 0.0117 3 0.19 0.45 0.189 7 3 0.17 0.35 0.0547 4 0.19 0.45 0.168 7 4 0.17 0.35 0.1727 5 0.19 0.45 0.118 7 5 0.17 0.35 0.3827 6 0.19 0.45 0.059 7 6 0.17 0.35 0.2757 7 0.19 0.45 0.033 7 7 0.17 0.35 0.2817 8 0.19 0.45 0.028 7 8 0.17 0.35 0.2777 9 0.19 0.45 0.041 7 9 0.17 0.35 0.0597 10 0.19 0.45 0.098 7 10 0.17 0.35 0.0097 11 0.19 0.45 0.18 7 11 0.17 0.35 0.0697 12 0.19 0.45 0.163 7 12 0.17 0.35 0.1088 1 0.19 0.45 0.239 8 1 0.17 0.35 0.0628 2 0.19 0.45 0.234 8 2 0.17 0.35 0.011KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 37 of 738 3 0.19 0.45 0.189 8 3 0.17 0.35 0.0548 4 0.19 0.45 0.168 8 4 0.17 0.35 0.1728 5 0.19 0.45 0.118 8 5 0.17 0.35 0.3828 6 0.19 0.45 0.059 8 6 0.17 0.35 0.2758 7 0.19 0.45 0.033 8 7 0.17 0.35 0.2818 8 0.19 0.45 0.028 8 8 0.17 0.35 0.2778 9 0.19 0.45 0.041 8 9 0.17 0.35 0.0598 10 0.19 0.45 0.098 8 10 0.17 0.35 0.0098 11 0.19 0.45 0.18 8 11 0.17 0.35 0.0698 12 0.19 0.45 0.163 8 12 0.17 0.35 0.1089 1 0.19 0.71 0.239 9 1 0.17 0.52 0.0629 2 0.19 0.71 0.231 9 2 0.17 0.52 0.0119 3 0.19 0.71 0.187 9 3 0.17 0.52 0.0549 4 0.19 0.71 0.166 9 4 0.17 0.52 0.1729 5 0.19 0.71 0.111 9 5 0.17 0.52 0.3769 6 0.19 0.71 0.052 9 6 0.17 0.52 0.2699 7 0.19 0.71 0.027 9 7 0.17 0.52 0.2789 8 0.19 0.71 0.022 9 8 0.17 0.52 0.2719 9 0.19 0.71 0.034 9 9 0.17 0.52 0.0599 10 0.19 0.71 0.091 9 10 0.17 0.52 0.0099 11 0.19 0.71 0.18 9 11 0.17 0.52 0.0699 12 0.19 0.71 0.157 9 12 0.17 0.52 0.10810 1 0.19 0.71 0.239 10 1 0.17 0.52 0.06210 2 0.19 0.71 0.231 10 2 0.17 0.52 0.01110 3 0.19 0.71 0.187 10 3 0.17 0.52 0.05410 4 0.19 0.71 0.166 10 4 0.17 0.52 0.17210 5 0.19 0.71 0.111 10 5 0.17 0.52 0.37610 6 0.19 0.71 0.052 10 6 0.17 0.52 0.26910 7 0.19 0.71 0.027 10 7 0.17 0.52 0.27810 8 0.19 0.71 0.022 10 8 0.17 0.52 0.27110 9 0.19 0.71 0.034 10 9 0.17 0.52 0.059KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 38 of 7310 10 0.19 0.71 0.091 10 10 0.17 0.52 0.00910 11 0.19 0.71 0.18 10 11 0.17 0.52 0.06910 12 0.19 0.71 0.157 10 12 0.17 0.52 0.10811 1 0.19 0.71 0.239 11 1 0.17 0.52 0.06211 2 0.19 0.71 0.231 11 2 0.17 0.52 0.01111 3 0.19 0.71 0.187 11 3 0.17 0.52 0.05411 4 0.19 0.71 0.166 11 4 0.17 0.52 0.17211 5 0.19 0.71 0.111 11 5 0.17 0.52 0.37611 6 0.19 0.71 0.052 11 6 0.17 0.52 0.26911 7 0.19 0.71 0.027 11 7 0.17 0.52 0.27811 8 0.19 0.71 0.022 11 8 0.17 0.52 0.27111 9 0.19 0.71 0.034 11 9 0.17 0.52 0.05911 10 0.19 0.71 0.091 11 10 0.17 0.52 0.00911 11 0.19 0.71 0.18 11 11 0.17 0.52 0.06911 12 0.19 0.71 0.157 11 12 0.17 0.52 0.10812 1 0.17 0.72 0.04 12 1 0.16 0.53 0.04812 2 0.17 0.72 0.054 12 2 0.16 0.53 0.00912 3 0.17 0.72 0.037 12 3 0.16 0.53 0.03612 4 0.17 0.72 0.026 12 4 0.16 0.53 0.10912 5 0.17 0.72 0.022 12 5 0.16 0.53 0.1812 6 0.17 0.72 0.022 12 6 0.16 0.53 0.12312 7 0.17 0.72 0.02 12 7 0.16 0.53 0.1812 8 0.17 0.72 0.014 12 8 0.16 0.53 0.1612 9 0.17 0.72 0.017 12 9 0.16 0.53 0.04512 10 0.17 0.72 0.021 12 10 0.16 0.53 0.00912 11 0.17 0.72 0.024 12 11 0.16 0.53 0.05412 12 0.17 0.72 0.028 12 12 0.16 0.53 0.085North American Stainless AirportNorth American Stainless SiteMonth Sector Albedo Bowen Ratio Surface Roughness Month Sector Albedo Bowen Surface RoughnessKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 39 of 73Length RatioLength1 1 0.17 0.79 0.047 1 1 0.16 0.75 0.0361 2 0.17 0.79 0.061 1 2 0.16 0.75 0.0231 3 0.17 0.79 0.05 1 3 0.16 0.75 0.051 4 0.17 0.79 0.044 1 4 0.16 0.75 0.151 5 0.17 0.79 0.053 1 5 0.16 0.75 0.2091 6 0.17 0.79 0.06 1 6 0.16 0.75 0.1671 7 0.17 0.79 0.056 1 7 0.16 0.75 0.0511 8 0.17 0.79 0.034 1 8 0.16 0.75 0.0231 9 0.17 0.79 0.019 1 9 0.16 0.75 0.0261 10 0.17 0.79 0.055 1 10 0.16 0.75 0.0361 11 0.17 0.79 0.04 1 11 0.16 0.75 0.0171 12 0.17 0.79 0.035 1 12 0.16 0.75 0.0222 1 0.17 0.79 0.047 2 1 0.16 0.75 0.0362 2 0.17 0.79 0.061 2 2 0.16 0.75 0.0232 3 0.17 0.79 0.05 2 3 0.16 0.75 0.052 4 0.17 0.79 0.044 2 4 0.16 0.75 0.152 5 0.17 0.79 0.053 2 5 0.16 0.75 0.2092 6 0.17 0.79 0.06 2 6 0.16 0.75 0.1672 7 0.17 0.79 0.056 2 7 0.16 0.75 0.0512 8 0.17 0.79 0.034 2 8 0.16 0.75 0.0232 9 0.17 0.79 0.019 2 9 0.16 0.75 0.0262 10 0.17 0.79 0.055 2 10 0.16 0.75 0.0362 11 0.17 0.79 0.04 2 11 0.16 0.75 0.0172 12 0.17 0.79 0.035 2 12 0.16 0.75 0.0223 1 0.15 0.49 0.055 3 1 0.15 0.48 0.0513 2 0.15 0.49 0.067 3 2 0.15 0.48 0.0343 3 0.15 0.49 0.056 3 3 0.15 0.48 0.0763 4 0.15 0.49 0.051 3 4 0.15 0.48 0.2353 5 0.15 0.49 0.062 3 5 0.15 0.48 0.3163 6 0.15 0.49 0.069 3 6 0.15 0.48 0.2653 7 0.15 0.49 0.067 3 7 0.15 0.48 0.078KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 40 of 733 8 0.15 0.49 0.043 3 8 0.15 0.48 0.0353 9 0.15 0.49 0.027 3 9 0.15 0.48 0.0393 10 0.15 0.49 0.077 3 10 0.15 0.48 0.0533 11 0.15 0.49 0.052 3 11 0.15 0.48 0.0233 12 0.15 0.49 0.045 3 12 0.15 0.48 0.0294 1 0.15 0.49 0.055 4 1 0.15 0.48 0.0514 2 0.15 0.49 0.067 4 2 0.15 0.48 0.0344 3 0.15 0.49 0.056 4 3 0.15 0.48 0.0764 4 0.15 0.49 0.051 4 4 0.15 0.48 0.2354 5 0.15 0.49 0.062 4 5 0.15 0.48 0.3164 6 0.15 0.49 0.069 4 6 0.15 0.48 0.2654 7 0.15 0.49 0.067 4 7 0.15 0.48 0.0784 8 0.15 0.49 0.043 4 8 0.15 0.48 0.0354 9 0.15 0.49 0.027 4 9 0.15 0.48 0.0394 10 0.15 0.49 0.077 4 10 0.15 0.48 0.0534 11 0.15 0.49 0.052 4 11 0.15 0.48 0.0234 12 0.15 0.49 0.045 4 12 0.15 0.48 0.0295 1 0.15 0.49 0.055 5 1 0.15 0.48 0.0515 2 0.15 0.49 0.067 5 2 0.15 0.48 0.0345 3 0.15 0.49 0.056 5 3 0.15 0.48 0.0765 4 0.15 0.49 0.051 5 4 0.15 0.48 0.2355 5 0.15 0.49 0.062 5 5 0.15 0.48 0.3165 6 0.15 0.49 0.069 5 6 0.15 0.48 0.2655 7 0.15 0.49 0.067 5 7 0.15 0.48 0.0785 8 0.15 0.49 0.043 5 8 0.15 0.48 0.0355 9 0.15 0.49 0.027 5 9 0.15 0.48 0.0395 10 0.15 0.49 0.077 5 10 0.15 0.48 0.0535 11 0.15 0.49 0.052 5 11 0.15 0.48 0.0235 12 0.15 0.49 0.045 5 12 0.15 0.48 0.0296 1 0.17 0.44 0.061 6 1 0.16 0.34 0.2316 2 0.17 0.44 0.071 6 2 0.16 0.34 0.2126 3 0.17 0.44 0.062 6 3 0.16 0.34 0.325KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 41 of 736 4 0.17 0.44 0.057 6 4 0.16 0.34 0.5956 5 0.17 0.44 0.069 6 5 0.16 0.34 0.696 6 0.17 0.44 0.075 6 6 0.16 0.34 0.6386 7 0.17 0.44 0.076 6 7 0.16 0.34 0.336 8 0.17 0.44 0.051 6 8 0.16 0.34 0.2176 9 0.17 0.44 0.034 6 9 0.16 0.34 0.2266 10 0.17 0.44 0.109 6 10 0.16 0.34 0.2176 11 0.17 0.44 0.079 6 11 0.16 0.34 0.076 12 0.17 0.44 0.053 6 12 0.16 0.34 0.097 1 0.17 0.44 0.061 7 1 0.16 0.34 0.2317 2 0.17 0.44 0.071 7 2 0.16 0.34 0.2127 3 0.17 0.44 0.062 7 3 0.16 0.34 0.3257 4 0.17 0.44 0.057 7 4 0.16 0.34 0.5957 5 0.17 0.44 0.069 7 5 0.16 0.34 0.697 6 0.17 0.44 0.075 7 6 0.16 0.34 0.6387 7 0.17 0.44 0.076 7 7 0.16 0.34 0.337 8 0.17 0.44 0.051 7 8 0.16 0.34 0.2177 9 0.17 0.44 0.034 7 9 0.16 0.34 0.2267 10 0.17 0.44 0.109 7 10 0.16 0.34 0.2177 11 0.17 0.44 0.079 7 11 0.16 0.34 0.077 12 0.17 0.44 0.053 7 12 0.16 0.34 0.098 1 0.17 0.44 0.061 8 1 0.16 0.34 0.2318 2 0.17 0.44 0.071 8 2 0.16 0.34 0.2128 3 0.17 0.44 0.062 8 3 0.16 0.34 0.3258 4 0.17 0.44 0.057 8 4 0.16 0.34 0.5958 5 0.17 0.44 0.069 8 5 0.16 0.34 0.698 6 0.17 0.44 0.075 8 6 0.16 0.34 0.6388 7 0.17 0.44 0.076 8 7 0.16 0.34 0.338 8 0.17 0.44 0.051 8 8 0.16 0.34 0.2178 9 0.17 0.44 0.034 8 9 0.16 0.34 0.2268 10 0.17 0.44 0.109 8 10 0.16 0.34 0.2178 11 0.17 0.44 0.079 8 11 0.16 0.34 0.07KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 42 of 738 12 0.17 0.44 0.053 8 12 0.16 0.34 0.099 1 0.17 0.78 0.055 9 1 0.16 0.75 0.2319 2 0.17 0.78 0.067 9 2 0.16 0.75 0.2129 3 0.17 0.78 0.057 9 3 0.16 0.75 0.3259 4 0.17 0.78 0.051 9 4 0.16 0.75 0.5959 5 0.17 0.78 0.063 9 5 0.16 0.75 0.699 6 0.17 0.78 0.07 9 6 0.16 0.75 0.6389 7 0.17 0.78 0.069 9 7 0.16 0.75 0.339 8 0.17 0.78 0.044 9 8 0.16 0.75 0.2179 9 0.17 0.78 0.027 9 9 0.16 0.75 0.2269 10 0.17 0.78 0.096 9 10 0.16 0.75 0.2179 11 0.17 0.78 0.07 9 11 0.16 0.75 0.079 12 0.17 0.78 0.045 9 12 0.16 0.75 0.0910 1 0.17 0.78 0.055 10 1 0.16 0.75 0.23110 2 0.17 0.78 0.067 10 2 0.16 0.75 0.21210 3 0.17 0.78 0.057 10 3 0.16 0.75 0.32510 4 0.17 0.78 0.051 10 4 0.16 0.75 0.59510 5 0.17 0.78 0.063 10 5 0.16 0.75 0.6910 6 0.17 0.78 0.07 10 6 0.16 0.75 0.63810 7 0.17 0.78 0.069 10 7 0.16 0.75 0.3310 8 0.17 0.78 0.044 10 8 0.16 0.75 0.21710 9 0.17 0.78 0.027 10 9 0.16 0.75 0.22610 10 0.17 0.78 0.096 10 10 0.16 0.75 0.21710 11 0.17 0.78 0.07 10 11 0.16 0.75 0.0710 12 0.17 0.78 0.045 10 12 0.16 0.75 0.0911 1 0.17 0.78 0.055 11 1 0.16 0.75 0.23111 2 0.17 0.78 0.067 11 2 0.16 0.75 0.21211 3 0.17 0.78 0.057 11 3 0.16 0.75 0.32511 4 0.17 0.78 0.051 11 4 0.16 0.75 0.59511 5 0.17 0.78 0.063 11 5 0.16 0.75 0.6911 6 0.17 0.78 0.07 11 6 0.16 0.75 0.63811 7 0.17 0.78 0.069 11 7 0.16 0.75 0.33KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 43 of 7311 8 0.17 0.78 0.044 11 8 0.16 0.75 0.21711 9 0.17 0.78 0.027 11 9 0.16 0.75 0.22611 10 0.17 0.78 0.096 11 10 0.16 0.75 0.21711 11 0.17 0.78 0.07 11 11 0.16 0.75 0.0711 12 0.17 0.78 0.045 11 12 0.16 0.75 0.0912 1 0.17 0.79 0.047 12 1 0.16 0.75 0.03612 2 0.17 0.79 0.061 12 2 0.16 0.75 0.02312 3 0.17 0.79 0.05 12 3 0.16 0.75 0.0512 4 0.17 0.79 0.044 12 4 0.16 0.75 0.1512 5 0.17 0.79 0.053 12 5 0.16 0.75 0.20912 6 0.17 0.79 0.06 12 6 0.16 0.75 0.16712 7 0.17 0.79 0.056 12 7 0.16 0.75 0.05112 8 0.17 0.79 0.034 12 8 0.16 0.75 0.02312 9 0.17 0.79 0.019 12 9 0.16 0.75 0.02612 10 0.17 0.79 0.055 12 10 0.16 0.75 0.03612 11 0.17 0.79 0.04 12 11 0.16 0.75 0.01712 12 0.17 0.79 0.035 12 12 0.16 0.75 0.022KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 44 of 73Appendix C. Lead Emission SourcesFacility Source IDX Coord.[m]Y Coord.[m]BaseElevation[m]ReleaseHeight[m]EmissionRate[g/s]Gas ExitTemperature[K]Gas Exit Velocity[m/s]InsideDiameter[m]DescriptionCOMB01 358314.98 4226074.65 1.75E+02 250.85 0.126429.82 29.87 8.595Unit 1Boiler- Coal UseCOMB02 358314.98 4226074.28 1.75E+02 250.85 0.126 429.82 29.87 8.595Unit 2 Boiler-Coal UseBig SandyCOMB04 358357.69 4226142.21 1.75E+02 31.09 0.126 659.26 17.983 2.103Aux. Unit 2 BoilerCalgonCarbon045 361167.00 4244297.94 168.08 29.87 0.1744 435.9318.288 0.853Reactivation Furnance001 738518 4179618 302.04 17.07 8.97E-05 322.04 17.678 1.524Grid Casting baghouse (4 total)002 738627 4179511 300.6 13.410.0001945 299.82 20.726 1.524Assembly Baghouse (4 total)003 738632 4179534 305.25 13.410.0001207 299.82 21.031 1.067Plate Finishing Baghouse (2 total)004 738543 4179577 302.16 15.85 0.001701 299.82 25.908 0.61Iron Clad Filling Baghouse005 738545 4179581 302.28 15.85 0.001189 299.82 19.507 0.61Iron Clad Filling Baghouse006 738542 4179573 302.08 15.85 0.01298 299.82 19.507 0.701Iron Clad Filling Baghouse011 738532 4179615 302.32 18.29 9.65E-05 355.3711.582 0.366Lead Oxide Mill #1 Baghouse021 738538 4179614 302.48 18.29 0.04423 355.37 14.326 0.366Lead Oxide Mill #2 Baghouse024 738636 4179538 306.19 12.19 1.74E-05 299.82 23.774 1.006Assembly Baghouse025738508 4179616 301.75 12.19 5.54E-05 299.82 17.678 1.433Pasting BaghouseEnersys031738535 4179614 302.39 18.29 3.97E-05 355.37 26.822 0.366Lead Oxide Mill #3 BaghouseS1 666748.47 4287588.65 147.5 64.92 1.40E-09313.15 21.92 1.219Natural Gas - BoilerS2 666776.71 4287551 147.46 64.92 0.0328 408.15 19.48 4.572Natural Gas Boiler/FurnaceS3 667246.62 4287783.1 148.98 29.87 9.75E-06 477.59 10.24 0.914FurnaceNorthAmericanStainlessS4 667027.48 4287593.63 149.29 49.99 3.02E-06 477.59 4.02 1.999FurnaceCOMB5009 314777.41 4090785.83 105.78 71.32 1.75E-01 449.82 17.556 2.713Bark/Combination BoilerNewpage008 314893.44 4090844.76 109.01 24.38 5.75E-03 349.82 9.144 1.753Lime KilnKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 45 of 73PBO1 678882.78 4104156.63 309.88 15.54 6.33E-06 407.04 7.925 0.381Oxide Mill 1PBO2 678888.02 4104159.91 309.75 15.54 6.12E-06 379.82 7.925 0.381Oxide Mill 2C1 678849.23 4104100.07 310.38 13.410.0007216 317.04 14.021 1.219Grid Casting OperationP1 678840.57 4104179.77 313.03 13.410.0001385338.71 9.754 1.524Pasting Operation3P_AB 678797 4104154 314.49 13.11 0.002087 310.93 7.011.8293 Process Operation a&b Lines3P_C 678839.45 4104378.74 313.99 12.19 0.03577 310.9310.668 1.0673 Process Operation c LinesSP_1 678835.72 4104354.56 314.41 7.62 4.32E-08310.93 14.021 2.53Smalls Parts CastingSuperiorBatterySP_2 678851.22 4104354.37 314.47 6.1 5.75E-10 310.9314.021 0.253Battery Cable ManufacturingSTCK1 342436.92 4113016.64 94.71 243.840.1211 429.82 29.428 8.534Units 1-5TVAShawneeSTCK2 342087.82 4113168.96 95.89 243.840.1211 422.04 29.632 8.53Units 6-10KY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 46 of 73Appendix DFigure 1.Big Sandy-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 47 of 73Figure 1.1Big Sandy-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 48 of 73Figure 2.Big Sandy-Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 49 of 73Figure 2.1Big Sandy-Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 50 of 73Figure 3.Calgon Carbon-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 51 of 73Figure 3.1Calgon Carbon-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 52 of 73Figure 4.Calgon Carbon-Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 53 of 73Figure 4.1Calgon Carbon-Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 54 of 73Figure 5.Enersys-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 55 of 73Figure 5.1Enersys-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 56 of 73Figure 6.Enersys -Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 57 of 73Figure 6.1Enersys -Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 58 of 73Figure 7.North American Stainless-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 59 of 73Figure 7.1North American Stainless -Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 60 of 73Figure 8.North American Stainless -Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 61 of 73Figure 8.1North American Stainless -Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 62 of 73Figure 9.Newpage-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 63 of 73Figure 9.1Newpage-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 64 of 73Figure 10.Newpage -Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 65 of 73Figure 10.1Newpage -Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 66 of 73Figure 11.Superior Battery-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 67 of 73Figure 11.1Superior Battery-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 68 of 73Figure 12.Superior Battery-Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 69 of 73Figure 12.1Superior Battery-Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 70 of 73Figure 13.TVA-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 71 of 73Figure 13.1TVA-Airport, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling ConcentrationKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 72 of 73Figure 14.TVA-Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Entire DomainKY Division for Air QualityLead Waiver RequestPage 73 of 73Figure 14.1TVA-Site, High 1stHigh Monthly Average Concentration, Controlling Concentration

# Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan for Source Oriented Lead (Pb)

Request for Waiver

CBSA Louisville-Jefferson County KY -IN MSA

Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District

850 Barret Avenue Louisville, KY 40204

Prepared by: Larry Garrison Environmental Supervisor Air Quality Unit May 28, 2009

### Introduction:

On November 12, 2008 the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for lead to increase protection of public health and the environment. Since 1978 the ambient air lead standards have been set at 1.5μg/m 3 

### and were based on a quarterly average. The new revised standards are set at 0.15μg/m 3 

### for the primary (health-based) and the secondary (welfare-based) standards and are calculated using a 3-month rolling average. In conjunction with the revision of the lead NAAQS, the EPA promulgated new monitoring requirements which can be found in 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D. One of the requirements is to evaluate the adequacy of existing source oriented lead monitoring networks and/or to determine if additional lead monitoring networks are needed. The deadline for this review and the identification of source oriented lead monitoring sites is July 1, 2009 with monitoring to begin January 1, 2010. Based on this requirement and guidance issued by EPA the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (LMAPCD) has evaluated historical data as well as current emissions inventories to determine the applicability and design of a source oriented lead monitoring network in Jefferson County, Kentucky.

Wavier Provisions:
40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, Section 4.5(ii) contains waiver provisions for source oriented lead monitoring. Monitoring may be waived for sources if the state or local agency can demonstrate that the lead source will not contribute to a maximum lead concentration in ambient air in excess of 50% of the NAAQS (0.075μg/m 3 

### ). This demonstration may be based on historical monitoring data, modeling, or other means.

Evaluation of Historical Data:
LMAPCD operated a lead monitoring network designed to monitor mobile and facility emissions during the period of (1980-1997). The monitoring was conducted according to the methods listed in 40 CFR Part 50 Appendix G Reference Method for the Determination of Lead in Suspended Particulate Matter Collected from Ambient Air. Removal of lead from automotive gasoline and the installation of particulate control systems at facilities resulted in a sharp decline in lead emissions and as measured levels declined the monitoring network was reduced to just two sites in 1988. Based on recommendations made by EPA and the fact that measured levels were significantly below the NAAQS, LMAPCD discontinued lead monitoring in 1997 to fre e up resources for the upcoming PM 2.5 

### monitoring program. Table 1 and Chart 1 provide a summary of the data collected by that network. Although the averaging method used for the old standard is different the data indicate that at the end of the lead monitoring program, the maximum quarterly averages were approximately 13% of the new NAAQS.

### Table 1 Lead: Monitoring History Values are maximum quarterly averages (μg/m 3 

### )

Site Location Sampling Year 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 6028 Shivley 1.2 0.47 0.40 0.30 0.17 0.11 0.08

- - - - - - - - - - - 6035 Sanders 0.6 0.26

- - - 0.09

- - - - - - - - - - - - 6036 Lake Dreamland 0.9 0.18 0.40 0.16 0.16 0.10 0.08

- - - - - - - - - - - 6038 Okolona 2.3 0.75 1.16 0.69 0.49 0.35 0.1 6 0.09

- - - - - - - - - - 6038 Okolona(c)

- - - - - 0.38 0.16 0.10

- - - - - - - - - - 6050 Floyd & Jefferson 2.3 0.49 0.89 0.55 0.41 0.38 0.16 0.14

- - - - - - - - - - 6052 Deer Park 1.6 0.41 0.60 0.33 0.23 0.24 0.09

- - - - - - - - - - - 6054 Bates 0.4 0.13 0.31 0.13 0.10 0.09 0.05 0.02

- - - - - - - - - - 6055 WLKY 1.3 0.37 0.62 0.32 0.19 0.19 0.09

- - - - - - - - - - - 6058 Buechel 1.3 0.39 0.44 0.41 0.24 0.17 0.08 0.06

- - - - - - - - - - 6059 Portland 1.6 0.43 0.45 0.42 0.28 0.21 0.12 0.08

- - - - - - - - - - 6061 Valley Village 1.5 0.42 0.79 0.39 0.26 0.21 0.10 0.07

- - - - - - - - - - 6063 Saint Matthews 1.6 0.48 0.62 0.44 0.26 0.20 0.10 0.07

- - - - - - - - - - 6099 Boy Scouts

- - 0.94 0.84 0.60 0.45

- - - - - - - - - - - - 6101 Southwick

- - - 0.38 0.27 0.19 0.09 0.07

- - - - - - - - - - 6101 Southwick (c )

- - - - - 0.19 0.09 0.07

- - - - - - - - - - 6102 Wyandotte

- - - 0.49 0.47 0.34 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.0 9 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.01 6106 Riverport

- - - - - - 0.06 0.06

- - - - - - - - - - 6107 St. Stephen s

- - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.02 6107 St. Stephen s (c )

- - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 (c)- co -located sampler



### Chart 1:

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97μg/m3 

## LMAPCD Lead Monitoring Network

Maximum Quarterly Average per Year

Max Qtr Average
2008 NAAQS
1978 NAAQS

### West Jefferson Air Toxics Study

From April 2000-April 2001, LMAPCD conducted an air toxics study for West Jefferson County. A component of that study was the collection of metals which included lead. Samples were collected every 12 days using the Hi-Volume method prescribed in 40 CFR Part 50 Appendix G. The samples were analyzed at EPA’s Science and Ecosystem Support Division (SESD) laboratory in Athens, Georgia using ICP/MS. According to SESD the typical detection limit using this method was 0.0006024μg/m 3



### . Table 2 contains a summary of the 3-month rolling averages from that data. The numbers in Bold are the maximum 3-month rolling average values for each site. The maximum 24-hour value recorded was 0.035μg/m 3



### .

Table 2: Lead Results from West Jefferson Air Toxics Study

(Results are 3 month rolling averages in μg/m 3 )

Sampling Period Ralph

Avenue 21

- 111

- 0054 Lake

Dreamland 21

- 111

- 0055 St. Stephen s

Church 21

- 111

- 0056 Shelby

Campus 21

- 111

- 0057 Firearms

Training 21

- 111

- 1014 04

- 06/2000 .0083 .0093 .0133

- .0012 05

- 07/2000 .0090 .0081 .0113 .0066 .0103 06

- 08/2000 .0106 .0079 .0124 .0048 .0091 07

- 09/2000 .0084 .0070 .0189 .0039 .0088 08

- 10/2000 .0121 .0093 .0129 .0083 .0149 09

- 11/2000 .0167 .0142 .0143 .0134 .0199 10

- 12/2000

. 01 74 .0155 .0133 .0138 .0194 11

- 01/ 2000

- 2001 .0150 .0136 .0125 .0124 .0163 12

- 02/ 2000

- 2001 .0103 .0106 .0121 .0089 .0138 01

- 03/2001 .0105 .0103 .0123 .0072 .0129 02

- 04/2001 .0083 .0115 .0149 .0048 .0078



### Identification of Lead Sources: 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Section 4.5(a) requires monitoring at sources that emit 1.0 ton per year (tpy) or more of lead to the air. Monitoring agencies must use the most recent National Emissions Inventory (NEI) data or other scientifically justifiable methods and data to determine if a facility emits more than 1.0 tpy. Based on a review of the latest Na tional Emissions Inventory data, 2006-2007 local inventory data and a review of the 2006-2007 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) data, LMAPCD has identified the Louisville Gas & Electric Mill Creek facility as the only source in Jefferson County that emits more than 1.0 tpy of lead to the air. The 2005 NEI data for LG&E Mill Creek indicates their emissions were 0.97 tpy.

Table 3 : Lead Sources in Jefferson County (tpy)

Facility Name 2006 LMAPCD inventory 2007 LMAPCD inventory LG&E Mill Creek 0.94 1.01 LG&E Cane Run 0.35 0.35 Oxy Vinyls LP 0.11 0.13 Kosmos Cement Co. 0.11 0.108 Industrial Container Services 0.136 0.019 Bluegrass Cooperage 0.000 0.00498 Poly One 0.028 0.004

### Modeling Parameters:

Using guidance provided in EPA’s “Technical Note -Dispersion Modeling for Lead (Pb) Sources” LMAPCD conduct ed dispersion modeling for the Mill Creek facility using the AERMOD model for near-field dispersion. The modeling performed relied on five years of meteorological data taken from the most representative surface and upper air meteorological stations. For surface, meteorological data for years 1989-1993 from the Louisville International Airport were used. Th e airport is approximately 18 km north east of the facility and has similar topography. For upper air, meteorological data for 1989-1993 were used from the Dayton Wright Patterson Air Force Base. The 1989-1993 data sets were used because they were the most complete.

Source Pathwa y

– Source Inputs
The LG&E Mill Creek facility is a coal fired electric utility that uses 4 commercial boilers (units) for generation of electricity via steam turbines and generators. The combined generating capacity of the 4 units is approximately 1,610 MW. Most of the lead emissions are attributed to the combustion of coal and the annual emission rates were calculated using updated throughputs and AP -42 emission factors for controlled coal combustion sources. Each unit utilizes emissions control equipment consisting of an electrostatic precipitator, a sulfur dioxide removal system and a dry centrifugal dust collector for the coal bunker. The final emission points are four individual stacks that are approximately 182 meters high. Table 4 contains the source inputs for each stack.

Table 4: Source Inputs

Source Type ID X

coordinate (m) Y

coordinate (m) Base

elevation Release

Height (m) Emission

rate (g/s) Gas

Exit Temp (K) Gas Exit velocity (m/s) Stack

Inside Diameter (m) Point STCK1 595606.79 4212148.98 0.00 182.88 0.14460 325.37 19.46 4.72 Point STCK2 595606.10 4212191.80 0.00 182.88 0.12980 327.04 21.08 4.72 Point STCK3 595600.37 4212287.52 0.00 182.88 0.18580 327.04 19.98 5.52 Point STCK4 595602.65 4212307.55 0.00 182.88 0.2400 0 324.82 22.45 5.94 

### Other inputs used in the model were: Averaging time was set to one month to facilitate the calculation of a three month rolling average and to use the lead post processor provided by EPA. The toxics non default option was chosen to access the total deposition output. For source p athway “ particulate ” was chosen for gas and particle deposition. Based on the assumption that only a small fraction (<10%) of the mass is greater than 10 microns, Method 2 was selected for handling particle deposition by total particulate mass. Particle inputs for Method 2 consisted of the fine particle fraction equaling 0.75 and the mass mean particle diameter equaling 0.5 microns. No volume sources were specified. No area sources were specified. No open pit sources were specified. No circular area sources were specified.

### No polygon area sources were specified.

No flare sources were specified. No line sources were specified. Flat terrain was assumed for the entire modeling domain.

Results and Discussion:
Although the historical monitoring data collected in 1980-1997 used a different averaging method, the evaluation of that data indicates that the measured values were significantly below 0.15μg/m 3 

### at the time monitoring was terminated in 1997. The evaluation of the lead results from the (2000-2001) West Jefferson County Air Toxics Study also indicates measured values significantly below the new standard. These results were compiled using the 3-month rolling average that applies to the new standard.
The modeling results for Mill Creek indicate that the maximum 1-month average was 0.01914μg/m 3 

### . Using the post processor provided by EPA the overall maximum 3-month concentration was 0.01μg/m 3 

### . This is substantially below the 50% NAAQS threshold of 0.075μg/m 3 

### and is consistent with the historical measured values indicated in Tables 1 and 2. The plots of the high month values for the source as well as the output files for the maximum 3- month average concentration are attached.

Conclusion:
Based on historical monitored data and the modeling results, LMAPCD has demonstrated that a source oriented lead monitoring network is not warranted and requests a waiver for monitoring at the LG&E Mill Creek facility. Should the waiver be granted, LMAPCD will renew the waiver

re quest during each 5 year network assessment required by 40 CFR Part 58.10(d). LMAPCD will also review emissions inventory data during its annual network review to determine if significant changes in lead emissions occur.

# APPENDIX D

Public Comment

### NOTICE OF PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD KENTUCKY DIVISION FOR AIR QUALITY AMBIENT AIR MONITORING NETWORK


### In accordance with 40 C.F.R. 58.10(a)(1), the Kent ucky Energy and Environment Cabinet will make the annual monitoring network plan available for public insp ection for at least 30 days prior to submission to the U.S. EPA. The annual monitoring network plan details the operation and location of ambient air monitors operated by the Kentucky Division for Ai r Quality, Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District, and the National Park Service.
The public comment period relating to the annual monitoring network will begin May 29, 2009, and will conclude on June 28, 2009. Copies of the annual monitoring plan are available for public inspection at the locations listed below. Any individual requiring copies may submit a request to the Division for Air Quality in writing, by telephone, by F AX, or by electronic mail. Requests for copies should be directed to the contact person. In addition, an electronic version of the proposed annual monitoring network plan and relevant attachments can be downloaded from the Division for Air Quality’s website at:
http://www.air.ky.gov/homepage_repository/Public+Notices.htm
Again, to be considered part of the record, co mments must be received by June 28, 2009. Comments should be sent directly to the contact person.

CONTACT PERSON: Andrea P. Keatle y, Environmental Scientist II, Division for Air Quality, 200 Fair Oaks Lane, 1 st 

### Floor, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601. Phone: (502) 564-3999; FAX: (502) 564-4666; email: Andrea.Keatley@ky.gov
The Energy and Environment Cabinet does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or disability and provides, upon request , reasonable accommodati on including auxiliary aids and services necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in all services, programs, and activities.
LMAPCD Ashland Regional Office Bowling Green Regional Office 850 Barret Avenue, Suite 205 1550 Wolohan Drive, Suite 1 1508 Westen Avenue Louisville, KY 40204-1745 Ashland, KY 41102-8942 Bowling Green, KY 42104
Frankfort Regional Office Hazard Re gional Office London Regional Office 663 Teton Trail, Suite B 233 Birch Str eet, Suite 2 875 S Main Street Frankfort, KY 40601-1758 Hazard, KY 41701-2179 London, KY 40741
Paducah Regional Office Florence Regi onal Office Owensboro Regional Office 130 Eagle Nest Drive 8020 Veterans Mem Dr, Suite 110 3032 Alvey Park Dr, Suite 700 Paducah, KY 42003-0823 Florence, KY 41042 Owensboro, KY 42303-2191

### Andrea P. Keatley Environmental Scientist II Division for Air Quality 200 Fair Oaks Lane, 1st Floor Frankfort, KY 40601

June 27, 2009
Dear Ms. Keatley,
Following are comments from the Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al on the 2009 Air Quality Ambient Air Monitoring Network. Our organizations are concerned with the impacts of toxic pollutants in our air and strive to find solutions to improve our air quality and protect our health and the environment, and provide this comments to the Department of Air Quality with that goal in mind.
Particulate Matter Monitoring
Given the number of stationary sources of particulate matter (PM) in Kentucky, namely coal fired power plants, and the health risks associated with PM2.5 in particular, it seems that the number of PM2.5 monitoring stations is inadequate. Particul ate matter is linked to asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary diso rder, heart disease a nd a wide range of other serious illnesses. 1 

### Given that, the monitoring netw ork appears to be lacking in monitors that could accurately measure emi ssions from facilities such as the Spurlock power plant in Maysville and the Dale pl ant in Clark County. We request that DAQ revisit the emissions deposition around thes e facilities. DAQ could use CMAQ modeling to predict maximum downwind impact from po wer plants, as a means of determining the best placement of PM2.5 monitors.
In addition, there are proposed coal-fired power plants in Clark and Estill Counties, yet the nearest monitoring station in Richmond may not be adequate to establish an accurate

1 Health Effects Institute. Research Report: Extended Analysis of the American Cancer Society Study of Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality. Number 140, May 2009. Pope,C.A., III, Ezzati,M., Dockery,D.W., 2009. Fine -Particulate Air Pollution and Life Expectancy in the United States, N Engl J Med 360, pp. 376-386. Dominici,F., Peng,R.D., Bell,M.L., Pham,L., Mc Dermott,A., Zeger,S.L., Samet,J.M., 2006. Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, JAMA 295, pp. 1127-1134. Pope,C.A., III, Burnett,R.T., Thun,M.J., Calle,E .E., Krewski,D., Ito,K., Thurston,G.D., 2002. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA 287, pp. 1132-1141. Villeneuve PJ, Chen L, Rowe BH, Coates F. Out door air pollution and emergency department visits for asthma among children and adults: a case-crossover study in northern Alberta, Canada. Environmental Health, Dec. 24, 2007.

### reading of air emissions from those facilities, should they come to be. DAQ should consider adding monitoring stations for particulate matter in these areas.

DAQ should also consider the increase in ai r pollution from increased residential and industrial development. Some regions of Kentucky, including the central Kentucky region surrounding Lexington, are fa st changing with increasing residential sprawl into rural areas, an increase in automobile tra ffic, construction-related air emissions and therefore an increase in the levels of particulate matter fr om these and other sources. DAQ should consult with EPA on urban growth air modeling strategies and the necessity of additional monito ring capabilities.
Mercury Monitoring
Mercury is a high-risk toxicant with myriad human health imp acts, most notably linked to developmental disorders. 2 

### Despite the fact that coal fired power plants are a leading source of mercury, Kentucky does not appear to be adequately measuring the most toxic form of mercury – methylmercury – origina ting from power plants and other industrial facilities. Kentucky’s waterway s already carry fish consumpt ion advisories due to high levels of toxic mercury. The air monitori ng network plan could include fish tissue sampling in order to determine the impacts of air releases of mercury on wildlife and human health, and back trajectory modeling of contaminated fish could also identify the source of the mercury, so that the state can take a more precautionary approach to reducing mercury emissions.
Lead Monitoring
To begin with, DAQ’s monitoring network plan modeling ignored emissions from startup and shut-down of facilities, which can be at emissions rates at 100 – 400 times more than routine facility operations . The plan should therefore be modified to include that inevitability.
KY DAQ is requesting a waiver of the source specific monitoring requirement for lead for Superior Battery, AEP Big Sandy Plant, Newpage, TVA Shawnee Fossil Plant, North American Stainless and LG&E Mill Creek even though these sources have over 1 ton per year (TPY) of lead emissions. However, be cause this request is based on inadequate modeling, it is arbitrary. Thus, the waiver cannot be granted a nd KY DAQ must design

2 Philip W. Davidson, PhD, Gary J. Myers, MD and Bernard Weiss, PhD. Philip W. Mercury Exposure and Child Development Outcomes. PEDIATRICS Vol. 113 No. 4 April 2004. RL Jones, PhD, T Sinks, PhD, SE Schober, PhD, M Pickett, MPH. Blood Mercury Levels in Young Children and Childbearing-Aged Women --- United States, 1999—2002. National Center for Environmental Health; National Center for Health Statistics, CDC. November 2004. Clarkson N. Current concepts: the toxicology of mercury---current exposures and clinical manifestations [Review]. N Engl J Med 2003. National Academy of Sciences. Toxicologic effects of methylmercury. Washington, DC: National Research Council; 2000.

### its monitoring plan to include source specifi c monitoring for lead for Superior Battery, AEP Big Sandy Plant, Newpage, TVA Shawnee Fossil Plant, North American Stainless and LG&E Mill Creek.
To begin with, there is no evidence presented that the meteorological data used for the modeling that forms the basis of the waiver requ est is site-specific. See Plan at C-4. For Mill Creek, the upper air station data is from Dayton, Ohio, which is over 100 miles away from Mill Creek. See Plan at C-18. Modeling that is based on meteorological data from an area other than area that was modeled is not valid.
Furthermore, for Superior Battery, TVA Sh awnee and Newpage, the modeling was based on upper air station meteorological data for just 26 days rather than 5 years of meteorological data. See Plan at C-4. DAQ ad mits that this data was inadequate. See Plan at C-4. There is no rational basis to assume that the 26 days of upper air station meteorological data in any way presents a ra tional approximation of actual ambient lead level impacts from these three sources. Th is is even more so the case in a place like Kentucky that experiences signi ficant seasonal varia tions in weather and the 26 days of data was from the winter.

In addition, DAQ admits that it relied on outdate d meteorological data because “The cost for more recent data for this particul ar project would be in excess of $2200. Unfortunately, funding for those data is unavaila ble.” Plan at C-4. Thus, not only is the failure to require source specific monitori ng for these sources arbitrary because the waiver request is based on outdated data, DAQ should not be allowed to implement the Clean Air Act with regard to lead at all. 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)(E)(i ) requires that State Implementation Plans include a demonstration that the state will have adequate funding to implement the program. Here, DAQ admits th at it does not have adequate funding. It cannot come up with a mere $2200. Thus, EPA, rather than DAQ, should implement the Clean Air Act with regard to lead in Kentucky.
Turning back specifically to the lead monitoring waiver request, the modeling that DAQ is relying upon is arbitrary because it reli es on airport meteorological data which is invalid and is contrary to EPA’s modeling gu idance. See Plan at C-4, C-18. For air dispersion modeling purposes, airport data are among the least desirable.
Problems with location and the general quality of data are the primary concerns. EPA, in their Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications, summarizes these concerns about using airport data:
For practical purposes, because airport data were readily available, most regulatory modeling was initially performed using thes e data; however, one should beware that airport data, in general do not meet this guidance. 3 

### First Airports are comprised of concrete runways, parking lots , passenger terminals, and othe r structures associated with air travel activities. These surface and buildi ng characteristics in tu rn affect the boundary

3 EPA, Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications, EPA-454/R-99-05, February 2000, p. 1-1.

### layer meteorology present at the airport. 4 

### In addition, landings, takeoffs, and idling of airplanes affect the site-specific conditions at the airport such that the meteorological conditions are not representative of th e area surrounding the 6 facilities requesting waivers, several of which are adjacent to a water bodies. Second, another major issue is the quality of the meteorological data collect ed at the Airports. It is important to remember that the airport data are not co llected with the thoug ht of air dispersion modeling in mind. For example, airport conditions are typically reported once per hour, based on a single observation (usually) taken in the last ten minutes of each hour. EPA recommends that sampling rates of 60 to 360 per hour, at a minimum, be used to calculate hourly-average d meteorological data. 5 

### Air dispersion m odeling requires hourlyaveraged data, which represents the entire hour being modeled, not a snapshot taken in one moment during the hour.
In addition, data collected at Airports are not subject to the system accuracies required for meteorological data collected for air di spersion modeling. EPA recommends that meteorological monitoring for dispersion modeling use equipment that are sensitive enough to measure all conditions necessary for verifying compliance with the NAAQS and PSD increments. For example, low wind speeds (down to 1.0 meter per second) are usually associated with peak air quality impacts - this is because modeled impacts are inversely proportional to wind speed. Followi ng EPA guidance, wind speed measuring devices (anemometers) should ha ve a starting threshold of 0.5 meter per second or less. 6 

### Furthermore, wind speed measurements should be accurate to within plus or minus 0.2 meter per second, with a measurement resolution of 0.1 meter per second. 7



### Airport data, rather than being measured in 0.1 meter per second increments, is usually based on wind speed observations that are reported in whole knots. To further exemplify the problem of using the air port data, the lowest wind sp eed included in the airport meteorological data files is usuall y 1.56 meters per second (three knots).

In addition, all winds lower than three knots are reported as calms, and are thus excluded from the modeling analyses. The conditions mo st crucial for verifying compliance with the lead threshold for the waiver are being excluded from the analysis because of the choice to use the airport data . Sensitive and accurate measurements of wind speeds are necessary for measuring winds down to 0.5 me ter per second (about one knot), which can then be used as 1.0 meter per second in the air dispersion modeling analyses. There would be no need to label such low wind speed hours as calm, which will greatly increase the number of hours included in the modeling analyses. Again, it is these low wind speed hours which must be included in the modeling data se t to verify complia nce with the lead threshold. Because DAQ failed to do this, a wa iver cannot be granted and source specific monitoring of these 6 sour ces must be conducted.

4 Oke T.R., Boundary Layer Climates, Halsted Press, 1978, pp. 240-241. 5 EPA, Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications, EPA-454/R-99-05, February 2000, p. 4-2.
6 Id., p. 5-2.

7 Id., p. 5-1



### .

### Thank you for your attention to these comme nts. If you have any questions please contact Elizabeth Crowe, Kentucky E nvironmental Foundation, (859) 986-0868. Otherwise we look forward to your response.
Sincerely,

Elizabeth Crowe, Executive Director Kentucky Environmental Foundation PO Box 467 Berea, KY 40403
James Gignac, Midwest Director Sierra Club National Coal Campaign 70 East Lake Street, Suite 1500 Chicago, IL 60601
Robert Ukeiley Law Office of Robert Ukeiley 435R Chestnut St. Berea, KY 40403
John Belanger, MD 124 Crescent Dr. Berea, KY 40403

Joan Moore, MS, FNP PO Box 2174 Berea, KY 40403

### KENTUCKY DIVISION FOR AIR QUALITY AMBIENT AIR MONI TORING NETWORK Comments Received 6/29/2009
Energy and Environment cabinet Department for Environmental Protection Division for Air Quality

(1) A public comment period on the KENTUC KY DIVISION FOR AIR QUALITY AMBIENT AIR MONITORING NETWORK 2009 was held from May 29, 2009 through June 28, 2009.

(2) The following individuals submitted written co mments during the public comment period:

Name and Title Organization
Ronald R. Van Stockum, Jr., President Shelby County Organized for Preservation and Enhancement, Inc.

Susan Guess, Chair of Board Paducah Area Chamber of Commerce

Elizabeth Crowe, Executive Director Kentucky Environmental Foundation James Gignac, Midwest Director Si erra Club National Coal Campaign Robert Ukeiley Law Office of Robert Ukeiley John Belanger, MD Joan Moore, MS, FNP

Summary of Comments

(1) Subject: Shelby County Air Monitoring

(a) Comment: The Shelby County Organized for Preservation and Enhancement, Inc. (SCOPE) commented “SCOPE wishes to preser ve and enhance the quality of the air in Shelby County. SCOPE believes that air-monitoring stations similar to those found in Jefferson, Bullitt and Oldham Counties should be established in Shelby County for that purpose.” Ronald R. Van Stockum, Jr., Shelby County Organized for Preservation and Enhancement, Inc. (SCOPE)
(b) Response: The division acknowledges this comment and shall take it into consideration during the 2010 five-year netw ork assessment. Currently, the division is meeting the monitoring requirements for the ambient air mon itoring network as required in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendices A, C, D, E and G.

### (2) Subject: Paducah Middle School Monitor Site 21-145-1004

(a) Comment: The Paducah Area Chamber of Commerce commented “...we are not sure if the Division is aware that the Paducah Mi ddle School located at 342 Lone Oak Road in Paducah is in the process of deciding on a si te for a new school bu ilding. Currently, AQS Site 21-145-1004 Air Quality Moni tor is located on the roof of the Paducah Middle School. If the Paducah Middle School decides to move , we feel the viability of an unoccupied building as an air monitoring site becomes questionable. Although the move is not scheduled to occur prior to 2012, we would su ggest that the Division start the process to select an alternate site for this monitor . ” Susan Guess, Paducah Area Chamber of Commerce
(b) Response: The division acknowledges this comment.
(3) Subject: Particulate Matter Monitoring

(a) Comment: The Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al commented “Given that, the monitoring network appears to be lacking in monitors that could accurately measure emissions from facilities such as the Spurlock power plant in Maysville and the Dale plant in Clark County. We request that DAQ re visit the emissions deposition around these facilities. DAQ could use CMAQ modeling to predict maximum downwind impact from power plants, as a means of determini ng the best placement of PM2.5 monitors.” Elizabeth Crowe, James Gignac, Robert Ukeil ey, John Belanger, and Joan Moore, Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al.
(b) Response: The division acknowledges this comm ent. The division shall take into consideration the areas identif ied in the above mentioned comment for the 2010 five-year network assessment. However, the division is not lacking in monitors but exceeds the monitoring requirements for the PM2.5 network as required in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendices A, C, D, E and G.

(c) Comment: The Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al commented “In addition, there are proposed coal-fired power plants in Clark and Estill Counties, yet the nearest monitoring station in Richmond ma y not be adequate to establish an accurate reading of air emissions from those facilities, should they come to be. DAQ should consider adding monitoring stations for particul ate matter in these areas.” Elizabeth Crowe, James Gignac, Robert Ukeil ey, John Belanger, and Joan Moore, Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al.
(d) Response: The division acknowledges this comm ent. The division shall take into consideration the areas identif ied in the above mentioned comment for the 2010 five-year network assessment.

### (e) Comment: The Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al commented “DAQ should also consider the increase in air pollution from increased residential and industrial development. Some regions of Kentuc ky, including the central Kentucky region surrounding Lexington, are fast changing with incr easing residential sprawl into rural areas, an increase in automobile traffic, construc tion-related air emissions and therefore an increase in the levels of particulate matte r from these and other sources. DAQ should consult with EPA on urban growth air modeling strategies and the necessity of additional monitoring capabilities.” Elizabeth Crowe, James Gignac, Robert Ukeil ey, John Belanger, and Joan Moore, Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al.
(f) Response: The division acknowledges this comm ent. The division shall take into consideration the areas identif ied in the above mentioned comments for the 2010 five-year network assessment. However, the division is not lacking in monitors but exceeds the monitoring requirements for the PM2.5 network as required in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendices A, C, D, E and G.

(4) Subject: Mercury Monitoring

(a) Comment: The Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al commented “Despite the fact that coal fired power plants are a lead ing source of mercury, Ke ntucky does not appear to be adequately measuring the most toxic fo rm of mercury – methylmercury – originating from power plants and other i ndustrial facilities. Kentucky’s waterways already carry fish consumption advisories due to high levels of toxic mercury. The air monitoring network plan could include fish tissue sampling in order to determine the impacts of air releases of mercury on wildlife and human health, and back trajectory modeling of contaminated fish could also identify the source of the mercury, so that the state can take a more precautionary approach to reducing mercury emissions.” Elizabeth Crowe, James Gignac, Robert Ukeil ey, John Belanger, and Joan Moore, Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al.
(b) Response: The division acknowledges this comment. Fish tissue samples are collected by the Division of Water for the Department for Environmental Protection. The Division for Air Quality is also housed in the De partment for Environmental Protection.
In January of 2007, an Affiliation Agreement was signed between the University of Louisville (UofL) and the Cabinet that houses the Department for Environmental Protection. The signed agreement allowed a student from th e UofL School of Information and Public Health to begin the process of linking fish consumption advisories and all environmental data relating to mercury. The project cataloged all mercury data collected in Kentucky. The signed Affiliation Agreement allows current and future UofL students to continue the fish consumption advisory project.
(5) Subject: Lead Monitoring

### (a) Comment: The Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al commented “...DAQ’s monitoring network plan modeling ignored em issions from start-up and shut-down of facilities, which can be at emissions rates at 100 – 400 times more th an routine facility operations. The plan should therefore be m odified to include that inevitability. ” Elizabeth Crowe, James Gignac, Robert Ukeil ey, John Belanger, and Joan Moore, Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al.
(b) Response: The division acknowledges this comment and does not concur that the plan should be modified. The division followe d 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix W and guidance “AERMOD Implementation Guide” revised March 19, 2009, provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA also provided comments on the proposed lead waiver document. The division worked with EPA to provide th e best possible modeled data available of the lead waiver request.

(c) Comment: The Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al commented “...because this request is based on inadequate modeling, it is ar bitrary. Thus, the waiver cannot be granted and KY DAQ must design its monitoring plan to include source specific monitoring for lead for Superior Battery, AEP Big Sandy Plant, Newpage, TVA Shawnee Fossil Plant, North American Stainless and LG&E Mill Creek.” Elizabeth Crowe, James Gignac, Robert Ukeil ey, John Belanger, and Joan Moore, Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al.
(d) Response: The division does not concur. The division followed 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix W and guidance “AERMOD Implem entation Guide” revised March 19, 2009, provided by EPA. EPA also provided comments on the proposed lead waiver document. The division worked with EPA to provide the best possible modeled data available of the lead waiver request.

(e) Comment: The Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al commented “... there is no evidence presented that the meteorological data used for the modeling that forms the basis of the waiver request is site -specific... Modeling that is ba sed on meteorological data from an area other than area that was modeled is not valid...Furthermore, for Superior Battery, TVA Shawnee and Newpage, the modeling was based on upper air sta tion meteorological data for just 26 days rather than 5 years of meteorological data...The re is no rational basis to assume that the 26 days of upper air stati on meteorological data in any way presents a rational approximation of actual ambient lead level impacts from these three sources...DAQ admits that it relied on outdated meteorological data because “The cost for more recent data for this particular project would be in excess of $2200. Unfortunately, funding for those data is unavailable.”... Thus, not only is the fa ilure to require source specific monitoring for these sources arbitrary because the waiver request is based on outdated data, DAQ should not be allowed to implement the Clean Air Act w ith regard to lead at all...the modeling that DAQ is relying upon is arbitrary because it re lies on airport meteorological data which is invalid and is contrary to EPA’s modeling guidance...For air disper sion modeling purposes, airport data are among the least desirable.”

### Elizabeth Crowe, James Gignac, Robert Ukeil ey, John Belanger, and Joan Moore, Kentucky Environmental Foundation et al.
(f) Response: The division concurs in part. The meteor ological data used in the model was not current. However, the division has obtai ned more current meteorological data and has re-run the model for the lead sources. The new model demonstrates that all of the previous sources, requesting a waiver for lead monitoring, stil l do not contribute to the lead ambient concentrations by more than 1⁄2 the lead NAAQS with the exception of the Superior Battery source located in Russell Springs, KY. The di vision will be locating a monitoring site near the Superior Battery source location.

The division does not concur th at “Modeling that is based on meteorological data from an area other than area that was modeled is not valid...” or th at “the modeling that DAQ is relying upon is arbitrary because it relies on airp ort meteorological data which is invalid and is contrary to EPA’s modeling guidance...” The division has followed modeling guidance provided by 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix W, “AERMOD Implementation Guide” revised March 19, 2009, and through personal corresponde nce with EPA. The guidance provides for meteorological data to be used from multiple sources including airports and not limited to site-specific data.UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Sep. 20, 2010 Report Request ID: 791571 Report Code: AMP380

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID: NOQ

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

21

21

39

39

39

39

39 117

037

017

025

027

061

165 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS

MERGE PDF FILES Option Type Option Value

YES SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4 Order Column

STATE_CODE
COUNTY_CODE
SITE_ID
EPA_REGION

GLOBAL DATES

2007 Start Date End Date

2009 01 01 12 31 TribalUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 1 of 28 Kentucky 21-037-3002 Site ID: NKU Site Name: Local ID:

524A John Hill Road Street Address:

20070701 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20071005 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Atlanta EPA Region:

Campbell County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Highland Heights City:

Dist. to City(km): 6554 City Population: Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Not in an urban area Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 41076 Zip Code:

2017 Census Block: 2 Block Group: 05300 Census Tract:

4 Congressional District:

+39.021806 Site Latitude:

UTM Zone:
3 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.474453 Site Longitude: UTM Northing:

WGS84 Datum: GPS Coll. Method:

232.0 Vertical Measure(m): UTM Easting:

Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Rural Location Setting:

Agricultural Land Use:

Site located on Northern Kentucky University's rural agricultural property. SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Kentucky Division For Air Quality

Agency Desc
20070701 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS

SPECIAL PURPOSE Monitor Type

14

1 # of
Monitors Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: Mean Sea-Level Vert Datum : Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 2 of 28 Kentucky 21-117-0007 Site ID: Site Name: KAIRS 3199 Local ID:
1401 DIXIE HWY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE Street Address:

19750101 Date Established: Date Terminated: Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Atlanta EPA Region:

Kenton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Covington City:

3 Dist. to City(km): 43370 City Population: SW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.072500 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:
0 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.525000 Site Longitude:

4327530 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: GPS Code (Pseudo Range) Precise Position Coll. Method:

225.0 Vertical Measure(m): 714115 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

NWS Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

12075 Dist to Met. Site(m): W Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Residential Land Use:

KY 3-199 CHASE LAW SCHOOL SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Kentucky Division For Air Quality

Agency Desc
19750101 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS

SPECIAL PURPOSE

SUPLMNTL SPECIATI

OTHER Monitor Type

12

17

65

3 # of
Monitors

1 Road
Number
MT ALLEN ROAD

Road Name

200 Traffic
Count 1993

Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

W

Compass
Sector Unknown Vert Method: Unknown Vert Datum : 0 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 3 of 28 Kentucky 21-117-0007 Site ID: Site Name: KAIRS 3199 Local ID:
1401 DIXIE HWY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE Street Address:

19750101 Date Established: Date Terminated: Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Atlanta EPA Region:

Kenton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Covington City:

3 Dist. to City(km): 43370 City Population: SW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.072500 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:
0 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.525000 Site Longitude:

4327530 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: GPS Code (Pseudo Range) Precise Position Coll. Method:

225.0 Vertical Measure(m): 714115 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

NWS Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

12075 Dist to Met. Site(m): W Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Residential Land Use:

2

3 Road
Number
DIXIE HIGHWAY

I-71/75 Road Name

7000

95000 Traffic
Count 1993

1993 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

MAJ ST OR HY

EXPRESSWAY Road Type

N

E Compass
Sector Unknown Vert Method: Unknown Vert Datum : 0 Vert Accuracy:

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 4 of 28 Ohio 39-017-0003 Site ID: VERITY H.S. Site Name: Local ID:

BONITA & ST JOHN Street Address:

19730104 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Butler County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Middletown City:

4.5 Dist. to City(km): 51605 City Population: NW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45044 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.493611 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.353889 Site Longitude:

4374695 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

209.0 Vertical Measure(m): 727550 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Urban And Center City Location Setting:

Industrial Land Use:

ON ROOF OF VERITY HIGH SCHOOL SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
19730104 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

QA COLLOCATED

SLAMS

OTHER

SPECIAL PURPOSE

NON-REGULATORY Monitor Type

1

6

39

26

8 # of
Monitors

Road
Number Road Name Traffic
Count Traffic

Year Traffic Volume Source Road Type Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 5 of 28 Ohio 39-017-0003 Site ID: VERITY H.S. Site Name: Local ID:

BONITA & ST JOHN Street Address:

19730104 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Butler County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Middletown City:

4.5 Dist. to City(km): 51605 City Population: NW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45044 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.493611 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.353889 Site Longitude:

4374695 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

209.0 Vertical Measure(m): 727550 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Urban And Center City Location Setting:

Industrial Land Use:

1

2 Road
Number
BREIEL BLVD.

BONITA Road Name

10000

4000 Traffic
Count 2001

2001 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

MAJ ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

W

N Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 6 of 28 Ohio 39-017-0004 Site ID: HAMILTON FIRE HOUSE Site Name: Local ID:

SCHULER AND BENDER Street Address:

19820101 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Butler County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Hamilton City:

Dist. to City(km): 60690 City Population: Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Hamilton, OH Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45011 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.383333 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.544167 Site Longitude:

4361990 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

193.0 Vertical Measure(m): 711510 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Commercial Land Use:

SUPPORTING

SUPPORTING Role Southwestern Ohio Air Pollution Control Agency

Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services Agency Desc
19820101

19920817 Begin Date

19920816 End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS Monitor Type

1 # of
Monitors

1

2 Road
Number
BENDER

SCHULER Road Name

1000

1000 Traffic
Count 1992

1992 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

LOCAL ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

S

W Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 7 of 28 Ohio 39-017-0015 Site ID: OHIO BELL Site Name: Local ID:

3901 LEFFERSON Street Address:

19910106 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20100421 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Butler County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Middletown City:

3 Dist. to City(km): 51605 City Population: NW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Middletown, OH Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45044 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.489900 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.364067 Site Longitude:

4374276 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

204.0 Vertical Measure(m): 726689 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Industrial Land Use:

OHIO BELL FACILITY SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
19910106 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS Monitor Type

11 # of
Monitors

1 Road
Number
LEFFERSON RD.

Road Name

8000 Traffic
Count 2001

Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

S

Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 8 of 28 Ohio 39-017-0016 Site ID: SACRED HEART SCHOOL Site Name: Local ID:

400 NILLES RD. Street Address:

20001003 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20090918 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Butler County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Fairfield City:

1 Dist. to City(km): 42097 City Population: NW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Not in an urban area Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45014 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.338333 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.566389 Site Longitude:

4356939 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation-Map Coll. Method:

187.0 Vertical Measure(m): 709741 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Urban And Center City Location Setting:

Residential Land Use:

SACRED HEART SCHOOL SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
20001003 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS Monitor Type

3 # of
Monitors

1

2 Road
Number
NILLES ROAD

RIVER ROAD Road Name

19520

10800 Traffic
Count 2006

2000 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

THRU ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

S

E Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 9 of 28 Ohio 39-017-1004 Site ID: HOOK FIELD AIRPORT Site Name: Local ID:

HOOK FIELD AIRPORT Street Address:

19730101 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Butler County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Middletown City:

Dist. to City(km): 51605 City Population: SE Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Middletown, OH Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45042 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.530000 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.392500 Site Longitude:

4378635 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

196.0 Vertical Measure(m): 724125 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Commercial Land Use:

MONITORING TRAILOR AT HOOK FIELD AIRPORT SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
19730101 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

1

2

3 Road
Number VERITY PARKWAY, S.R. 73

ELMWOOD STREET

WILBRAHAM ROAD Road Name

8011

1500

2000 Traffic
Count 2006

2001

2001 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

MAJ ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

N

E

S Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 10 of 28 Ohio 39-025-0022 Site ID: CLERMONT COUNTY GOVERNMENT BLDG. Site Name: Local ID:

2400 CLERMONT CENTER DR. Street Address:

20010401 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20100907 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Clermont County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Batavia City:

31 Dist. to City(km): 1617 City Population: E Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45103 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.082319 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.144193 Site Longitude:

4329605 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

262.0 Vertical Measure(m): 747030 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Residential Land Use:

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
20010401 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS Monitor Type

5 # of
Monitors

1 Road
Number
STATE ROUTE 32

Road Name

30708 Traffic
Count 2005

Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

EXPRESSWAY Road Type

S

Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 11 of 28 Ohio 39-027-1002 Site ID: MONITOR AT LAUREL CAREER CENTER AT WILMINGTON INDUST. Site Name: Local ID:

62 LAUREL DR. Street Address:

19930401 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20060510 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Clinton County:

Wilmington, OH CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Wilmington City:

4 Dist. to City(km): 11921 City Population: SE Dir. to CBD: Wilmington-Chillicothe-Logan AQCR :

Local Region:

Not in an urban area Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.430000 Site Latitude:

17 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 83.788611 Site Longitude:

4367981 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation-Map Coll. Method:

327.0 Vertical Measure(m): 259981 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Rural Location Setting:

Commercial Land Use:

MONITORING SHELTER LOCATED AT THE WILMINGTON CAREER CENTER SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Ohio EPA, Southwest District Office

Agency Desc
19930401 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

OTHER

SLAMS Monitor Type

1

1 # of
Monitors

1 Road
Number
LAUREL DRIVE

Road Name

50 Traffic
Count 1988

Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

SE

Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 12 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0001 Site ID: CINCI. MAIN POST OFFICE Site Name: Local ID:

800 VINE ST. Street Address:

19570101 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Cincinnati City:

0 Dist. to City(km): 331285 City Population: Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45202 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.104722 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.513611 Site Longitude:

4331130 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

192.0 Vertical Measure(m): 715010 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Urban And Center City Location Setting:

Commercial Land Use:

THE DOWNTOWN FEDERAL BUILDINGI SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING

SUPPORTING Role Southwestern Ohio Air Pollution Control Agency

Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services Agency Desc
19570101

19920817 Begin Date

19920816 End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS Monitor Type

1 # of
Monitors

1

2 Road
Number
VINE ST.

9TH ST. Road Name

8900

4980 Traffic
Count 1997

2006 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

LOCAL ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

W

N Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 13 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0006 Site ID: HAMILTON COUNTY ODOT OUTPOST 'SYCAMORE' Site Name: Local ID:

11590 GROOMS RD Street Address:

19691003 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:

19910426 HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Cincinnati City:

23.3 Dist. to City(km): 331285 City Population: SW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45242 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.278499 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.365974 Site Longitude:

4350770 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

259.0 Vertical Measure(m): 727210 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Commercial Land Use:

RALSTON PURINA - 5.4 KM - 99 DEG., FORD SHARONVILLE 5.3 KM - 105 0 FORMICA - 6.5 KM - 238 DEG., OZONE 6/75 CO 8/75 TSP 6/75 SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING

SUPPORTING Role Southwestern Ohio Air Pollution Control Agency

Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services Agency Desc
19691003

19920817 Begin Date

19920816 End Date AGENCY ROLES

INDEX SITE

SLAMS Monitor Type

1

4 # of
Monitors

1

2

3 Road
Number
GROOMS RDS

I-275

ODOT ENTRANCE RD. Road Name

4357

115350

100 Traffic
Count 2004

2002

1992 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

THRU ST OR HY

FREEWAY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

W

NNE

N Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 14 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0006 Site ID: HAMILTON COUNTY ODOT OUTPOST 'SYCAMORE' Site Name: Local ID:

11590 GROOMS RD Street Address:

19691003 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:

19910426 HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Cincinnati City:

23.3 Dist. to City(km): 331285 City Population: SW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45242 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.278499 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.365974 Site Longitude:

4350770 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

259.0 Vertical Measure(m): 727210 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Commercial Land Use:

4 Road
Number
KEMPER ROAD

Road Name

19000 Traffic
Count 2000

Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

THRU ST OR HY Road Type

N

Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 15 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0010 Site ID: COLERAIN Site Name: Local ID:

6950 RIPPLE RD. Street Address:

19780101 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Cleves City:

8.1 Dist. to City(km): 2790 City Population: SW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45002 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.214931 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.690723 Site Longitude:

4342958 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

158.0 Vertical Measure(m): 699374 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Rural Location Setting:

Industrial Land Use:

MIAMITOWN CO. HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE BLDG SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING

SUPPORTING Role Southwestern Ohio Air Pollution Control Agency

Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services Agency Desc
19780101

19920817 Begin Date

19920816 End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS Monitor Type

3 # of
Monitors

1

2

3 Road
Number
I-74

HARRISON AVE.

RIPPLE ROAD Road Name

78950

11700

200 Traffic
Count 2002

2000

1991 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

ARTERIAL

FREEWAY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

S

N

W Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 16 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0014 Site ID: CARTHAGE Site Name: Local ID:

SEYMOUR & VINE ST. Street Address:

19691101 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:

19910426 HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Cincinnati City:

10.5 Dist. to City(km): 331285 City Population: S Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45216 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.194167 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.478889 Site Longitude:

4341145 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

163.0 Vertical Measure(m): 717720 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Industrial Land Use:

CARTHAGE FIRE HOUSE SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING

SUPPORTING Role Southwestern Ohio Air Pollution Control Agency

Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services Agency Desc
19691101

19920817 Begin Date

19920816 End Date AGENCY ROLES

OTHER
QA COLLOCATED

SLAMS Monitor Type

1

1

77 # of
Monitors

1

2 Road
Number
VINE ST.

SEYMOUR Road Name

11800

7950 Traffic
Count 1998

1998 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

THRU ST OR HY

THRU ST OR HY Road Type

E

S Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 17 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0014 Site ID: CARTHAGE Site Name: Local ID:

SEYMOUR & VINE ST. Street Address:

19691101 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:

19910426 HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Cincinnati City:

10.5 Dist. to City(km): 331285 City Population: S Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45216 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.194167 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.478889 Site Longitude:

4341145 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

163.0 Vertical Measure(m): 717720 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Industrial Land Use:

3 Road
Number
I-75

Road Name

161250 Traffic
Count 2002

Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

EXPRESSWAY Road Type

W

Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 18 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0021 Site ID: FEDERAL BLDG. Site Name: Local ID:

100 E. 5TH ST. Street Address:

19810201 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:

19910426 HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Cincinnati City:

1 Dist. to City(km): 331285 City Population: W Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45202 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.101944 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.509722 Site Longitude:

4330845 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

168.0 Vertical Measure(m): 715340 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Urban And Center City Location Setting:

Commercial Land Use:

SIDE ROOF OF FEDERAL BUIILDING, FOUNTAIN SQUARE SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING

SUPPORTING Role Southwestern Ohio Air Pollution Control Agency

Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services Agency Desc
19810201

19920817 Begin Date

19920816 End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS Monitor Type

1 # of
Monitors

1

2

3 Road
Number
FIFTH ST.

MAIN ST.

WALNUT ST. Road Name

17250

10600

10000 Traffic
Count 2001

2001

2002 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

LOCAL ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

S

E

W Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 19 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0040 Site ID: HC-DOES OFFICES Site Name: Local ID:

250 WM. HOWARD TAFT Street Address:

19990401 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Cincinnati City:

3 Dist. to City(km): 331285 City Population: S Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45219 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.128611 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.504167 Site Longitude:

4333840 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

256.0 Vertical Measure(m): 715745 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Urban And Center City Location Setting:

Commercial Land Use:

FOMER MEDICAL BUILDING NOW THE OFFICES OF HAMILTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
19990401 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

SUPLMNTL SPECIATI

SLAMS Monitor Type

61

11 # of
Monitors

1

2 Road
Number
WM. HOWARD TAFT RD

HIGHLAND AVE. Road Name

19000

8800 Traffic
Count 2006

1997 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

MAJ ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

S

E Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 20 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0041 Site ID: Site Name: Local ID:

5300 WINNESTE AVE. Street Address:

19980901 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20080709 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Cincinnati City:

4 Dist. to City(km): 331285 City Population: N Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45232 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.185967 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.513719 Site Longitude:

4340152 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation-Map Coll. Method:

198.0 Vertical Measure(m): 714746 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

On-Site Met Equip Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Urban And Center City Location Setting:

Industrial Land Use:

WINTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
19980901 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

SPECIAL PURPOSE

OTHER Monitor Type

15

47 # of
Monitors

1

2

3 Road
Number
WINNESTE

HOLLAND

STRAND Road Name

6800

3000

3000 Traffic
Count 1997

1999

1999 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

LOCAL ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

W

E

N Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 21 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0042 Site ID: LOWER PRICE HILL F.S. NO. 17 Site Name: Local ID:

2101 W. 8TH ST. Street Address:

20001003 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Cincinnati City:

2.7 Dist. to City(km): 331285 City Population: E Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45204 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.105000 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.551111 Site Longitude:

4331076 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

167.0 Vertical Measure(m): 711759 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Urban And Center City Location Setting:

Residential Land Use:

LOWER PRICE HILL FIREHOUSE NO. 17 SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
20001003 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS

SPECIAL PURPOSE Monitor Type

3

72 # of
Monitors

1 Road
Number
WEST EIGHT STREET

Road Name

12514 Traffic
Count 2005

Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

THRU ST OR HY Road Type

N

Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 22 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0043 Site ID: SCARLET OAKS SCHOOL Site Name: Local ID:

3254 E. KEMPER RD. Street Address:

20001003 Date Established: 20081231 Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Sharonville City:

22.5 Dist. to City(km): 13804 City Population: SW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45241 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.290278 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.414444 Site Longitude:

4351969 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

194.0 Vertical Measure(m): 722991 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Mobile Land Use:

SCARLET OAKS CAREER DEVELOPMENT CENTER SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
20001003 Begin Date

20081231 End Date AGENCY ROLES

1

2 Road
Number
KEMPER ROAD

I-275 Road Name

7600

112480 Traffic
Count 2001

2006 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

MAJ ST OR HY

FREEWAY Road Type

S

S Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 23 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0044 Site ID: Site Name: Local ID:

190 Main Street Street Address:

20050510 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20090814 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Addyston City:

Dist. to City(km): 1010 City Population: Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45001 Zip Code:

4000 Census Block: 4 Block Group: 02040 Census Tract:

1 Congressional District:

+39.138374 Site Latitude:

UTM Zone:

11 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.711570 Site Longitude: UTM Northing:

WGS84 Datum: GPS Coll. Method:

148.0 Vertical Measure(m): UTM Easting:

Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Residential Land Use:

VOC SITE SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
20050510 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

INDUSTRIAL Monitor Type

71 # of
Monitors

1

2

3 Road
Number
MAIN STREET

CHURCH STREET

U.S. 50 Road Name

4160

14033 Traffic
Count 2004

2004 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

LOCAL ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY

MAJ ST OR HY Road Type

SSW

WNW

SSW Compass
Sector GPS Carrier Phase Static Relative Position Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 5 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 24 of 28 Ohio 39-061-0045 Site ID: Site Name: Local ID:

745 DERBY AVE. Street Address:

20051001 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091009 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Cincinnati City:

Dist. to City(km): 331285 City Population: Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45232 Zip Code:

3003 Census Block: 3 Block Group: 00730 Census Tract:

1 Congressional District:

+39.170925 Site Latitude:

UTM Zone:

11 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.518663 Site Longitude: UTM Northing:

WGS84 Datum: GPS Coll. Method:

165.0 Vertical Measure(m): UTM Easting:

Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Urban And Center City Location Setting:

Residential Land Use:

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
20051001 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

SPECIAL PURPOSE Monitor Type

72 # of
Monitors

1

2

3 Road
Number
DERBY AVENUE

WINTON ROAD

SPRING GROVE AVENUE Road Name

3400

17745

24310 Traffic
Count 1996

2006

2004 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

LOCAL ST OR HY

THRU ST OR HY

MAJ ST OR HY Road Type

N

W

S Compass
Sector GPS Carrier Phase Static Relative Position Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 5 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 25 of 28 Ohio 39-061-5001 Site ID: LOCKLAND CITY HALL Site Name: Local ID:

101 COOPER AVE. Street Address:

19691009 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Lockland City:

1 Dist. to City(km): 3707 City Population: NW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45215 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.226389 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.453889 Site Longitude:

4344790 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

175.0 Vertical Measure(m): 719800 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Urban And Center City Location Setting:

Commercial Land Use:

ROOF OF LOCKLAND FIRE HOUSE SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING

SUPPORTING Role Southwestern Ohio Air Pollution Control Agency

Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services Agency Desc
19691009

19920817 Begin Date

19920816 End Date AGENCY ROLES

QA COLLOCATED

SLAMS Monitor Type

1

1 # of
Monitors

1

2 Road
Number
WYOMING AVE.

N. COOPER AVE. Road Name

4575

2000 Traffic
Count 2004

1992 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

THRU ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

SE

E Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 26 of 28 Ohio 39-061-7001 Site ID: NORWOOD Site Name: Local ID:

2059 SHERMAN AVE. Street Address:

19730104 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:

19810504 HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Norwood City:

1 Dist. to City(km): 21675 City Population: S Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45212 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.160000 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.457778 Site Longitude:

4337425 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

194.0 Vertical Measure(m): 719655 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Commercial Land Use:

ON ROOF OF HEALTH CENTER SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING

SUPPORTING Role Southwestern Ohio Air Pollution Control Agency

Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services Agency Desc
19730104

19920817 Begin Date

19920816 End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS Monitor Type

3 # of
Monitors

1 Road
Number
SHERMAN AVE.

Road Name

13050 Traffic
Count 2002

Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

THRU ST OR HY Road Type

N

Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 27 of 28 Ohio 39-061-8001 Site ID: Site Name: Local ID:

300 MURRAY RD. Street Address:

19701002 Date Established: 20100207 Date Terminated: 20100413 Last Updated:

19910426 HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Hamilton County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: St. Bernard City:

2 Dist. to City(km): 4924 City Population: SW Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45217 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.180278 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.491944 Site Longitude:

4339600 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

161.0 Vertical Measure(m): 716645 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Industrial Land Use:

ON THE ROOF OF HERBERT CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING

SUPPORTING Role Southwestern Ohio Air Pollution Control Agency

Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services Agency Desc
19701002

19920817 Begin Date

19920816

20100207 End Date AGENCY ROLES

1

2 Road
Number
VINE ST.

MURRAY RD. Road Name

11800

1500 Traffic
Count 1998

1992 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

THRU ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

W

S Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 1 Vert Accuracy:

TANGENT ROADS State:UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Sep. 20, 2010 SITE DESCRIPTION REPORT

Page 28 of 28 Ohio 39-165-0007 Site ID: Site Name: Local ID:

416 SOUTHEAST ST. Street Address:

20030514 Date Established: Date Terminated: 20091217 Last Updated:
HQ Eval. Date:

Chicago EPA Region:

Warren County:

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN CBSA: Cincinnati-Middletown-Wilmington,
OH-KY-IN CSA: Lebanon City:

.5 Dist. to City(km): 16962 City Population: N Dir. to CBD: Metropolitan Cincinnati AQCR :

Local Region:

Cincinnati, OH-KY Urban Area:

Class 1 Area: 45036 Zip Code:

Census Block: Block Group: Census Tract:

Congressional District:

+39.427797 Site Latitude:

16 UTM Zone:

12 Accuracy: Eastern Time Zone: - 84.202208 Site Longitude:

4367790 UTM Northing:

NAD27 Datum: Interpolation Coll. Method:

234.0 Vertical Measure(m): 740825 UTM Easting:

24000 Scale: Point Point/Line/Area: Monitoring Point Location Description:

Type Met Site: Met. Site ID:

Dist to Met. Site(m): Direct Met Site: Regional Eval. Date: Suburban Location Setting:

Residential Land Use:

IN A COMPLEX OF WARREN COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS SITE COMMENTS

SUPPORTING Role Hamilton County Department Of Environmental Services

Agency Desc
20030514 Begin Date End Date AGENCY ROLES

SLAMS Monitor Type

5 # of
Monitors

1

2 Road
Number
EAST STREET

JUSTICE DRIVE Road Name

2859

500 Traffic
Count 2006

2002 Traffic
Year Traffic Volume Source

MAJ ST OR HY

LOCAL ST OR HY Road Type

W

S Compass
Sector Topographic Map Interpolation Vert Method: NGVD29 Vert Datum : 5 Vert Accuracy:

ACTIVE MONITOR TYPES

TANGENT ROADS State:

# Appendix D

Base Year and Projected Emission Inventory
Technical Support Documents (TSD)

## Emissions Inventory A ssistance: 2005 Base Year
Bioge nic and Other (non-LADCO) State Emissions

Preparation and Delivery of Non-MRPO

Emission Files

Prepared for: Mr. Michael Koerber

Executive Director Lake Michigan Air Dir ectors Consortium

9501 West Devon Avenue, Suite 701 Rosemont, IL 60018

Prepared by: Alpine Geophysics, LLC 387 Pollard Mine Road

Burnsville, NC 28714

and
MACTEC Engineering and Cons ulting, Inc. 404 SW 140th Terrace Newberry, Florida. 32669

12 March 2007

i

## Table of Contents

Intr oduc tion

................................................................................................................... .............................................. 1

1. 0 P R O V ISI O N OF U N M O DIFIE D FI L E S

............................................................................................................ 2

1. 1 EGU, N ON -E G U AND S TA TIO NARY A REA S OURCES F O R MANE

- V U AND VIS T A S

................................. 2

2

. 0 PROVISION OF MODIFIED FILES

.................................................................................................................. 2

2. 1 N ONROAD

............................................................................................................................... .................... 2 2. 1. 1 Developme nt of MANEVU M ont hly Nonr oad Estimates

....................................................................... 2 2. 1. 2 Developme nt of VISTA S Seas onal N onr oad Estimates

.......................................................................... 4 2. 1. 3 Developme nt of CENRAP/WR AP Nonr oad E s timates

........................................................................... 5 2. 2 MA R

............................................................................................................................... ............................ 6 2. 2. 1 Developme nt of 2005 MA R E m issions

................................................................................................... 6 2. 3 EGU P OINT S OURCE F IL ES

.......................................................................................................................... 6 2. 3. 1 2002, 2009, and 2 018 E G U E m issions f o r C E

NRAP/WRAP

................................................................. 6 2. 3. 2 2 005 EG U Emis s i o n s

............................................................................................................................. 7 2. 4 N ON -EG U P OINT A ND S T A T I ONARY A REA S OURCE F I LES

.......................................................................... 7 2. 5 Q UALITY A SSU RANCE S TE P S

....................................................................................................................... 8

ii

## Acron y ms and Abbreviatio n s

CENRAP Central Regional Air Planning Association CMV Comm ercial Marine Ves s els C E C o n t r o l E f f i c i e n c y EPA Environm ental Protection Agency EGU Electric Generating Unit
F T P F i l e t r a n s f e r p r o t o c o l IDA Inventory D a ta Analyzer
M A N E

- V U M i d

- A t l a n t i c / N o r t h east Visibility U n ion NH 3 

### Ammonia
NIF National Em ission Inventory Form at NMIM National Mobile Inventory Model NONROAD no acronym (m odel na me) S I P S t a t e Im plem e n t a t i o n P l a n SMOKE Sparse Matrix Operat or Kernel Em issions Model VISTAS Visibility Improvem e nt State and T r ibal Association of the Southeast WRAP Western Regional Air Partnership

iii

## Introduction

The Lake M i chigan Air Directo r s Cons ortium (LADCO) States are conducting photochem i cal m odeling to support the deve lopm ent of State Im ple m entation Plans (SIPs) for ozone, PM2.5, and region al haze. A new round of modeling is planned with a

more recen t base year (2 005). To support th is modeling, an em issions in ventory for 2005 (and relevant future years – 2009 and 2018) is needed on an expeditious schedule.
To address this need, Alpine Geophysics (Alpin e) and MACTEC have team ed together to deliver and prepare a number of base and projection year emission files for regional planning organizations outside of the Midw est s t ate dom ain. These RPOs include th e Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visi bility U n ion (MANE-VU), Visibility State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTA S), Central Regional Air Planning A ssociation (CENRAP), and W e stern Regiona l Air Partne rship (W RAP). Alpine and MACTEC were uniquely qualified to provide these files havi ng already prepared or obtained base year and em ission projection s for each of th ese RPOs under other contracts.
Through oth e r contracts recen tly co mpleted or currently in p l ace with the Alpine/MA C TEC Tea m , 2002, 2005, 2009, and 2018 em ission inventories (in NIF3.0 or SMOKE IDA for m at) were in -house for each of the non-LADCO States and for each of the m a jor source sectors (EGU, non-EGU point, stationary area, nonroad MAR, NONROAD sources, and onroad acti vity and inp u t f iles ) . These data sets were either developed directly by the Study Team (V ISTAS and MANE-VU all years, CENRAP 2009, W R AP 2009) or obtained directly from the RPOs for processing em issions on the national 36km dom a in.

1

## 1.0

2.0 Provision of Unmodified Files

1.1 EGU, Non- EGU and Stationary A rea Sources for MANE-VU and VISTAS
Several of the required files requ ired no additional work other than to com p ile the f iles and m a ke them available to LADCO for their use. MACTEC gathered the EGU, non-EGU, and stationary

area sou r ce f iles for bo th MANE-VU and VISTAS and placed them on the AirToxics F T P site as delivery to LADCO. No m odifications of these files were m a de. Files delivered included EGU, non-EGU and stationary area source f iles for 2002, 2009 and 2018 for VISTAS and MANE-VU. Each of these files was in Na tional Inventory Form at (NIF) ve rsion 3.0. In addition, each of these files contained the annual em issions estim at es only and did not prov ide seasonal em ission estim ates.



## Provision of Modifi ed Files

2.1 Nonroad
As part of the proposal provide d to LADCO by MACTEC a nd AG, the team had indicated that while not prepared in this m a nner, seasonal and monthly em i ssion estim ates for the nonroad sector (excluding commercial m a ri ne, aircraft and railroads – [M AR]) could be prepared from the NONROAD05/NMIM m odel runs used to devel op these em issions. In addition the team had indicated that 2005 em ission estim a tes at the seas onal/m onthly level could also be created from these runs by interpolation of the 2002 and 2009 file s. This section describes the developm ent of the nonroad em ission files for 2002, 2005, 2009 and 2018 for each RPO. The develop m ent of the 2002, 2005, 2009 and 2018 MAR com ponent of the inve ntory at an annual level is described. The tem poral level developed varied by RPO.

For VISTAS and the W R AP, the initia l and re su lting m odeling files had b een prepared at th e seasonal level, thus only seasonal estim a tes were prepared for this work. For MANE-VU, the initial annual estim a tes had been prepared usi ng N M IM which generates estim ates at a monthly level. Thus MANE-VU estim ates were develope d at the m onthly level. CENRAP e m issions were availab l e at an annu al lev e l and therefor e p r ovided as su ch. The approaches used for each RPO are described below.

2.1.1 Developmen t of MANEVU Monthly Nonroad Estima tes As indicated above, the original annual NIF files prepared for MANE-VU for NONROAD model sources were developed using the NMIM model, with the exceptio n of e m issions for 2002 from Maine and the District of Columbia, whic h were prepared using the NONROAD m odel. For 2009 and 2018, all NONROAD m odel sources we re estim a ted using NMIM. MACTEC’s

2

### task was to convert the raw file s developed from NMIM into m onthly em i ssions in NIF for m at for 2002, 2009 and 2018. From thos e files, MA CTEC would then use th e 2002 and 2009 files to provide an interpolation of e m i ssions to obtain an estim ate for 2005.
NMIM output is stored in MySQL database tables. The first step was to obtain the raw output in MySQL. Since MACTEC had prepared the 2009 and 2018 files for MA NE-VU those tables were already in-house. However another contra ctor prepared the 2002 estim ates for MANE-VU. MACTEC/ AG contacted MANE-VU and obtained the MyS Q L data tables for the 2002 NMIM run for MANE-VU. However, since Maine and the District of Colum b ia 2002 em issions were not developed using NMIM, we also obtained th e 2002 annual estim ates in NIF form at. These annual estim ates were later converted to m ont hly estim ates. Details on that conversion are described later in this section.
The native output of the NMIM m o del is to prod uce m onthly em issions. Thus the MySQL tables already contained the monthly em ission estim a tes. However the MySQL for m at is not NIF 3.0. To obtain N I F 3.0 for m at, the reporting tool in N M IM m u st be used to generate m ont hly

em issions. MACTEC used the MyS Q L tables from the 2002, 2009 and 2018 em ission projections along with the NMIM reporting tool to form at the da ta into NIF 3.0 form at. These files are TXT for m at files that correspond to the CE, EM, EP, PE and TR tables in the NIF for m at. Once the files were output into TX T for m at, MACTEC used the NIF version 3.0 Microsof t A ccess da taba se shell to import the f i les into M i c r osof t Access f o r addition a l

m a nipulatio n and in ord e r to pe rf or m quality as surance che c ks on the d a ta. Output

2.1.1.1

2.1.1.2 Conversion of 2002 Annual Emissions for ME and DC to Monthly

As m e ntioned above, the 2002 NMIM MySQL tables did not include Maine and the District of Colum b ia since they were estim a ted using NONROAD05. As a consequence, before a 2005 estim ate could be prepared, the annual ME and DC estim ates had to be converted to monthly values. In order to do this, MACTEC devel oped MANE-VU wide m onthly fractions from the 2002 file. These fractions were th en applied to the annual values for DC and ME to obtain a monthly record from the annual value. Monthly en tries for each pollutant for the EM table were generated from an average m onthly fraction fr om all other MANE-VU States for 2002. In addition, m o nthly records were added to the PE table.

Calculation of the 2005 Estimates for MANE-VU

Once DC and ME m onthly em issions had been ca lculated and added to the m onthly emissions available for the other M ANE- VU States from the NMIM runs, the rem a ining step was to calculate 2005 em issions based on an interpol ation of e m issions between 2002 and 2009. In order to calc u late these e m issions the State, County, SCC and Pollutant in each EM table was

3

### m a tched in 2002 and 2009. In doing this, MACTEC identified that there were over 700 records in the 2009 f ile that did not exis t in the 2002 file. All of these records were for DC and ME and all were for the pollutant NH3. As a conseque nce, MACTEC decided to add the 2009 records to the 2002 file for these m i ssing reco rds with no change in em issions levels. The records are

m a rked in the database using one of the BLANK fiel ds in the EM table. T hus they can be easily identified.

Once the records m a tched between 2002 and 2009 at the S t ate, County, SCC and Pollutant level, the in terpo l a t ed em ission s were ca lcu l ated. The c a lculation w a s as f o llow s :

((2009 – 2002) * (3/7)) + 2002

Where:

2002 = 2002 em issions

2009 = 2009 em issions

3/7 = multiplier to determ ine 2005 em issi ons as a linear interpolation between 2002 and 2009

Once the 2005 em issions were calculated, appropri ate changes were m a de to the EM, PE and TR table to reflect a 2005 em ission inve ntory year. In addition, a sim ilar calculation was applied to throughput values in the PE table.
Finally, when all changes to the Access tables had been m a de, the NIF tab l es were exp o rted into TXT for m at, com p ressed using W i nZip and plac ed on AG’s FTP site for delivery to L ADCO.

2.1.2 Developmen t of VISTAS Seasonal Nonroad Estimates

VISTAS seasonal es tim ates were p r epared in a sim ilar m a nner to the MANE-VU mo nthly estim ates. In the preparation of the 2002, 2009 and 2018 files for VISTAS, the NONROAD05 model had been utilized to estim a te seasonal em i ssions. During preparation of the annual NIF files the fractions for each season found in the EP table were determ ined from the seasonal

em issions calculated by the NONROAD05 runs. Thus the seasonal percentages in the annual files in the E P table were not based on defau lts but were based on actual calculated seasonal

em issions. As a consequence, these seasonal p e rcentages w e re used to calculate s e as onal

em issions for 2002, 2009 and 2018.

Thus to calculate season al em issions , the annua l value was multip lied by the seasonal percen tage to obtain a seasonal value for winter, spring, sum m e r and fall.

4

### However, because th e winter season includes Dec e m b er, January and February, two en tries for the EM and PE tables w e re prepared for wint er estim ates, on e for December and one for the January through February portion. In order to calculate these se parate values, the num ber of days of the total season in each of th ese por tions was used to appor tion th e winter season

em issions to each entry. For exam ple, the winter season for each year (no n e of which are leap years) contains 90 days total (31 in D ecem ber, 31 in January and 28 in February). Thu s to get the Decem ber winte r value, the annu al em i ssion value was multip lied by the winter s e asonal fraction and by 31/90 (the num ber of days in Dece m b er divided by the total num ber of days in the season ). Sim ilarly for the Jan / Feb entr y the annual valu e was m u ltiplied by the seasonal percentage and by 59/90 (the num ber of days in Jan/Feb and the total num ber of days in the season). M a tching s easo n al records f o r each en try were added to the PE table and s e asonal throughput values were calcula ted in a sim ilar manner.

2.1.3 Developmen t of CENRAP/WRAP Nonroad Estimates As part of their responsibilities for other m ode ling conversion contracts, Alpine staff have converted em ission inventories and associated em i ssions m o deling files into a variety of for m ats, including NIF 3.0, SMOKE IDA, and RPO Data Ex change Protocol. Our proposed and approved

m e thod was to use the sam e procedures and script s used to convert the emission files from those contracts in the conversion to the NIF data form a t in this study. Em issions as provided on

tem poral scales (annual, seasonal, or daily) were used to populate the NIF em ission fields in the converted file.

Nonroad emission files for CENR AP and W R AP were converted and aggregated into a single nonroad series of NIF tables for each year of con v ersion (200 2, 2009, and 2018). W ithin each EM table provided per year, annual, seasonal, and daily em ission periods exist, based on the original obtained m odeling file from the individual RPO.
Our quality assuranc e in this ta sk was dedicated to the asserti on that the refor m atting of these data did not invalidate the inte grity of the original inventor ies. As such, QA on these files included the com p arison of refor m atted data to th e orig inal S M OKE IDA f iles ensur i ng that specific required fields had b een appropriately converted to the field type, length, and unit requirem e nts of the NIF structure.

2.1.3.1 Calculation of the 2005 Estimates for other RPOs

2005 em ission values w e re calculated for VI STAS, CENRAP, and W R AP using the sam e equation as in section 2.1.1.2. Values for 2002 and 2009 were interpolated to obtain a 2005 value for temporal allocation av ailable for the R P O.

5

### 2.2 MAR
For each of the non-MRPO RPOs, 2002, 2009 and 2018 estim a tes for M A R sources were provided at the annual level. The MAR estim at es were provided by extracting all MA R sources from the annual nonroad files which contai ned annual em issions from both MAR and NONROAD m odel sources. Approp riate records from the CE, EM, EP and PE tables were extracted an d placed into an Access databas e so lely containing MAR emissions. On ce the files

were com p iled they were then used to calcu late 20 05 MAR e m issions.

For CENRAP and W R AP e m issions, additional c onversions were m a de to convert S M OKE IDA for m atted files into the N I F 3.0 structure as not ed in the sections above. These em issions for MAR sources are included for these two RPOs in the nonroad em ission converted files.

2.2.1 Developmen t of 2005 MAR Emissions

The 2005 MAR e m issions were calculated usi ng the 2002 and 2009 em is sions and perform i ng a straight line interpolation of e m issions using the sam e equati on as provided in section 2.1.1.2. This approach was also used on the CE tabl e control efficiencies. W h ile the NONR OAD model sources did not contain any CE entries (NMIM does not generate any CE table entries), CE tables did contain som e entries in a few of the RPO reported f iles. Thes e values were given a straight line interpolation usi ng the equation in section 2.1.1.2.

2.3 EGU Point Source Files
Electric generating utility (EGU) poi nt source files have been prep ared by RPOs using a variety of m e thods. For base year em issions data, CEM em issions and heat input values are used to derive inven t ories and other unit level charact eristics for m odeling. Recen tly, ICF’s p r oprietary Integrated P l anning Model (IPM) has been utilize d by m a ny of the RPOs to derive future year

em ission estim a tes for this source category. In this project, both types of data were obtained from the RPOs and converted to the NIF 3. 0 for m at for LADCO’s modeling needs.

2.3.1 2002, 2009, and 2018 EGU Emissions for CENRAP/WRAP EGU point source em issions files for CENRAP a nd W R AP RPOs were obtained for 2002, 2009 and 2018 in SMOKE IDA for m at. Identical to the m e thods identified above, these files were translated to the NIF 3.0 for m at for this proj ect. F o r both RPOs and all years, annual em ission estim ates were available in the m odeling file s and were converted to NIF annual em ission records.

Sim ilar to the other SMOKE to NIF file convers ions, our quality assurance in this task was dedica ted to the asse rtion that the ref o rm atting of these data did not invalid ate th e integ r ity of the original inventories. As such, QA on these files included the com p arison of refor m atted data to

6

### the or igina l SMOKE IDA f iles ensur i ng tha t spec ific required fields had been appropriately converted to the field type , length, and unit requirem e nt s of the NIF structure.

2.3.2 2005 EGU Emissions EGU point source em issions files for 2005 for all the non-LADCO RPOs were developed under separate contract by Alpine using CEM re ported em issions, heat input, and control characteristics. For the C E M reported pollutant s NOx and SO2, e m issions were taken directly from the rep o rted values when available. For non-CEM pollutants, the CEM reported heat input was applied to 2002 calculated em ission rates (fro m the original RPO 2002 base year EGU files) to estim a te annual em issions from these polluta nts. In cases w h ere it was determ ined that increm ental controls had been applied between the 2002 and 2005 base year, control efficiencies (as noted by EPA documentation) were assigne d to the unit and em ission reductions were calculated accordingly. For un its which were new in 2005 (and not found in 2002 or 2009

em ission inventories), m e thods established by EP A and published on the NEI developm ent website were used to prepare em issio n estim ates and other un it level ch aracteris tics fo r these sources. In contrast to the 2002 EGU em issions provided by the RPOs and noted in the previous section, the EGU file for 2005 contains only em ission sources which reported under the CEM
program and were found in the EPA CEM databases.

Identical to the conversion m e thods identified for ot her source sectors, these files were translated to the NIF 3.0 for m at for this project. Fo r all 2005 EGU e m ission sources, annual em ission estim ates were available and were conve rted to NIF annual em ission records.

Sim ilar to the other SMOKE to NIF file convers ions, our quality assurance in this task was dedica ted to the asse rtion that the ref o rm atting of these data did not invalid ate th e integ r ity of the original inventories. As such, QA on these files included the com p arison of refor m atted data to the or igina l SMOKE IDA f iles ensur i ng tha t spec ific required fields had been appropriately converted to the field type , length, and unit requirem e nt s of the NIF structure.

2.4 Non-EGU Point and Stationary A rea Source Files
Non-EGU point and stationary area source em issi ons files for CENRAP a nd W R AP RPOs were obtained for 2002, 2005, 2009 and 2018 in SMOKE IDA form at. Using m e thods already established by Alpine for projects of em ission conversion for EPA, the RPOs, and other clients, these files were translated to the NIF 3.0 for m at for this project. For both RPOs and all years, annual em ission estim a tes were available in the modeling files and were converted to NIF annual

em ission records. The ex ception to annual em issi ons reportin g was for som e fugitive dust related categories in CENRAP a nd W R AP dom ains (road dust, agr i c u ltur a l dus t, etc.) whe r e s e asonal

em ission files in IDA form at were provided. In thes e ins t ances, the season al tem poral variab ility

7

### was m a intained in the conversion and appropriate seasonal em ission records were developed for the NIF CE tables.
Non-EGU point source files were prepared by subtracting out the EGU e m i ssions portion as estim ated and noted in section 2.3 above. Fo r 2002, 2009, and 2018, this was based on EGU files provided directly from the RPOs. For 2005, this s ubtraction was based on Alpine review of 2005 CEM-reporting em ission sources and rem oval of CEM reporting units from the non-EGU file.

Sim ilar to the nonroad file conversion, our quality assurance in this task was dedicated to the

asser tion tha t the ref o rmatting of the s e data d i d n o t inva lida t e the in tegr ity of the original inventories. As such, QA on these files included the com p arison of ref o rm atted data to the origin al SM OKE IDA fi les ensu ring that sp eci fic required fields ha d been appropriately converted to the field type , length, and unit requirem e nt s of the NIF structure.

2.5 Quality Ass u rance Steps

For the em ission estim a tes and data conversio ns described above, the following quality assurance (QA) steps were performed:

1. Sa m p le calculations were checked by hand in cluding database calculations. Database calculations were perform e d using a S ELECT qu ery before perform i ng an UPDATE query to change values

2. Total region-wide seasonal/m onthly em ission estim a tes were checked to com p are to annual region-wide estim ates at the pollutant level to ensure that values closely

m a tched.

3. In m o st cases, the EPA Basic Form at and Conten t Checker to ol was used to QA the databases developed prior to export of the f iles to TXT for m at. In a few cases this could not be perform e d due to the large si ze of the databases (the VISTAS seasonal databas e co ntained ov er 8 m illion re cords in th e EM table alone). In a ll cases a t le as t one of the databases was check ed w ith the tool, however.

4. Summ aries of e m issions at the S t ate/Count y/SCC/pollutant level were developed to

com p are 2002, 2005 and 2009 values.

5. Confir m e d that the reform atting of these da ta did not invalidate th e integ r ity of the original inventories.

6. We com p ared RPO provided em ission su mmaries to the em iss i on summ aries generated from the reform atted (NIF 3.0) data sets to ensure that all em issions have been accounted for in the conversion process.

8

# PECHAN

3622 Lyckan Parkway Suite 2005 Durham, NC 27707
919-493-3144 telephone 919-493-3182 facsimile

5528-B Hempstead Way Springfield, VA 22151

703-813-6700 telephone 703-813-6729 facsimile 

# DEVELOPMENT OF 2005 BASE YEAR GROWTH AND CONTROL FACTORS FOR LAKE MICHIGAN AIR DIRECTORS CONSORTIUM (LADCO)

F INAL 

# R EPORT

Prepared for:

Mr. Michael Koerber Executive Director Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium 9501 West Devon Avenue, Suite 701 Rosemont, IL 60018

Prepared by:

Andrew D. Bollman James H. Wilson E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 3622 Lyckan Parkway, Suite 2005 Durham, NC 27707

September 2007

Pechan Report No. 07.09.001/9458.000

### [ This page intentionally left blank]

### PECHAN September 2007



### iii Development of 2005 Base Year Growth and Control Factors for LADCO – Final Report 

# CONTENTS Page TABLES ......................................................................................................................... ............... iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS....................................................................................... v SECTION I. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................... 1 SECTION II. EMISSION ACTIVITY GROWTH DATA ....................................................... 3

A. OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................... ... 3 B. AREA SOURCE/MAR CATEGORIES............................................................................. 3 C. NON-EGU POINT SOURCES......................................................................................... 14 D. NONROAD MODEL SOURCES .................................................................................... 23 SECTION III. UPDATED EMISSION CONTROL DATA.................................................... 27

A. NON-EGU POINT SOURCE CONTROLS..................................................................... 27 1. NO x 

### SIP Call................................................................................................................. 27 2. MACT Standards .......................................................................................................... 27 3. Consent Decrees............................................................................................................ 2 7 4. On-the-Books (OTB) Control Additions ...................................................................... 35 5. Best Available Retrof it Technology (BART)............................................................... 35 B. AREA SOURCE/MAR CONTROLS............................................................................... 40 1. Area Sources ................................................................................................................ . 40 2. MAR Sources (Locomotives and Marine Vessels)....................................................... 44 SECTION IV. PREPARATION OF GROWTH AND CONTROL FILES ............................. 49

A. GROWTH FACTORS...................................................................................................... 49 B. CONTROL FACTORS..................................................................................................... 51 1. Point Source Control Factors........................................................................................ 51 2. Area Source and MAR Control Factors........................................................................ 52 SECTION V. REFERENCES ................................................................................................. 55

### PECHAN September 2007



### iv Development of 2005 Base Year Growth and Control Factors for LADCO – Final Report 

## TABLES

Table II-1. Priority Emission Activ ity Area Source/MAR Categories........................................... 4 Table II-2. Growth Indicators for Pr iority Area Source/MAR Categories ..................................... 7 Table II-3. Priority Emission Ac tivity Point Source Categories................................................... 15 Table II-4. Growth Indicators for Pr iority Point Source Categories............................................. 19 Table II-5. Priority Emission Activity NONROAD Model Source Categories............................ 24 Table II-6. Growth Indicators for Priori ty NONROAD Model Source Categories...................... 25 Table III-1. RICE Engines in Illinois Affected by NO x 

### SIP Call ................................................ 28 Table III-2. Post-2005 MACT St andards and Expected VOC, NO x 

### , and PM Reductions.......... 29 Table III-3. LADCO State Non- EGU Point Sources Affected by Consent Decree Requirements and Other On-the-Books Controls ................................................................................................ 32 Table III-4. Ohio RACT Rule Summary Cleveland/Akron 8-H our Ozone Nonattainment Area 35 Table III-5. BART Eligible Non-EGU Sources........................................................................... 36 Table III-6. Residential Wood Co mbustion NSPS Emission Reductions ................................... 43 Table III-7. Locomotive Emissions Reported in EPA Draft RIA................................................ 45 Table III-8. Percentage Reduc tions Associated with Federal Locomotive Standards................. 46 Table III-9. Percentage Re ductions Associated with Federal CMV Standards........................... 47 Table III-10. Commercial Marine Vessel Rule Penetration Values ............................................ 48 Table IV-1. RPO Data Exchange Protoc ol Format for Growth/Control Data.............................. 50 Table IV-2. Fields Populated in Growth Factor File .................................................................... 51 Table IV-3. Fields Populated in Po int Source Control Factor File............................................... 53 Table IV-4. Fields Populated in Area Source/MAR Control Factor File ..................................... 54

### PECHAN September 2007



### v Development of 2005 Base Year Growth and Control Factors for LADCO – Final Report 

# ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AEO Annual Energy Outlook AIM architectural and industrial maintenance BART best available retrofit technology CE control efficiency CMV commercial marine vessel DEQ Department of Environmental Quality DOE Department of Energy EGAS Economic Growth Analysis System EGU electric generating unit EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency FAA Federal Aviation Administration FCCUs fluid catalytic cracking units FCU fluid coking units FGR flue gas recirculation HAP hazardous air pollutant IC internal combustion LADCO Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium LAER lowest achievable emission rate LNB low NO x 

### burner MACT maximum achievab le control technology MAR marine, aircraft, and railroad MSAT mobile source air toxics NAAQS national ambient air quality standards NH3 ammonia NMIM National Mobile Inventory Model NO x 

### oxides of nitrogen NSPS new source performance standard OTB on-the-books OWB outdoor wood boiler Pechan E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. PFC portable fuel container PM particulate matter PM-2.5 particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers RACT reasonably availa ble control technology RE rule effectiveness REMI Regional Economic Models, Inc. RIA Regulatory Impact Analysis RICE reciprocating inte rnal combustion engines ROG reactive organic gases RP rule penetration RPO Regional Planning Organization SCC source classification code

### PECHAN September 2007



### vi Development of 2005 Base Year Growth and Control Factors for LADCO – Final Report 

### SIC standard industrial classification SIP State Implementation Plan tpy tons per year SO 2 

### sulfur dioxide VOC volatile organic compound