alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             186
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,104
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,619
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,887
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,892
<LOANS>                                         16,920
<ALLOWANCE>                                        409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,752
<DEPOSITS>                                      20,220
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                192
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  23,752
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,083
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  182
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    52
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,317
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 683
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 695
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              623
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       18
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    222
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       137
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7.560
<LOANS-NON>                                        210
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   406
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  409
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                95
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            314
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-5832.

#### Gregg Moore, Petitioner v. United States Postal Service, et al.

562 U.S. 957, 131 S. Ct. 499,

178 L. Ed. 2d 283,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7872.

October 12, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-110674, 333-91013, 333-85257, 333-46255, and 333-139012), and Registration Statements on FormS-8 (Nos. 333-123284, 333-102654, and 333-91867) of our report datedMarch 29, 2007, relating tothe financial statements of Double Eagle Petroleum Co. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Double Eagle Petroleum Co. for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLPDenver, ColoradoMarch 29, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16978]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
(SAMHSA) Notice of Meetings

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I in July 1998.
    Summaries of the meetings and rosters of the members may be 
obtained from: Ms. Dee Herman, Committee Management Liaison, SAMHSA, 
Office of Policy and Program Coordination, Division of Extramural 
Activities, Policy, and Review, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 17-89, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone: 301-443-7390.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the 
individuals named as Contact for the meetings listed below.
    The meetings will include the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual grant applications. These discussions could reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications. 
Accordingly, these meetings are concerned with matters exempt from 
mandatory disclosure in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and 5 U.S.C. App.2, 
Sec. 10(d).
    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I (SEP I).
    Meeting Date: July 22, 1998.
    Place: Hyatt Regency at Crystal City, 2799 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, VA 22202.
    Closed: July 22, 1998, 8:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m.
    Panel: Center for Mental Health Services Minority Fellowship 
Program SM98-008.
    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I (SEP I).
    Meeting Date: July 22, 1998.
    Place: Hyatt Regency at Crystal City, 2799 Jefferson Davis Highway 
, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Closed: July 22, 1998, 10:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.
    Panel: Center for Mental Health Services Cooperative Agreement for 
a Technical Assistance Center SM 98-011.
    Contact: Kenneth D. Howard, 17-89, Parklawn Building, Telephone: 
301-443-9919 and FAX: 301-443-3437.
    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I (SEP I).
    Meeting Dates: July 27-30, 1998, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., July 31, 
1998, 9:00 a.m.--adjournment
    Place: Hyatt Regency at Crystal City, 2799 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, VA 22202.
    Closed: July 27-30, 1998, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., July 31, 1998, 9:00 
a.m.--adjournment.
    Panel: Statewide Consumer and Consumer Supporter Networking Grants 
SM 98-013.
    Contact: Clark K. Lum, Room 17-89, Parklawn Building, Telephone 
301-443-9919, FAX: 301-443-3437.

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-16978 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
No. 10-6860.

#### Anthony A. Birtha, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1035, 131 S. Ct. 582,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8770,

178 L. Ed. 2d 425,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 351.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 48199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19798]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7978]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Bernini: Sculpting in Clay''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Bernini: Sculpting in Clay,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about October 3, 2012, 
until on or about January 6, 2013, the Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, 
Texas, from on or about February 3, 2013, until on or about April 14, 
2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 7, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-19798 Filed 8-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
NUMBER 13-18-00013-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

MATTHEW PATRICK AGNEW, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

ORDER 

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant’s amended brief. 

Appellant’s court appointed appellate counsel filed an amended Anders brief with this 

Court on September 10, 2018. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). 

Upon review of counsel’s Anders brief, we note the brief contains numerous formal and 
2

substantive defects, the brief does not meet Anders requirements, and the case has not 

been properly presented. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9. The brief here “does not refer us to 

anything in this cold record which might arguably support the appeal; it does not discuss 

any of the evidence adduced at trial; it does not supply us with ready references to the 

record, nor does it supply us with any citation to legal authorities.” High v. State, 573 

S.W.3d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 n.9 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding). An Ander’s brief should present a thorough, 

professional evaluation of the record showing why there are no arguable grounds for 

advancing an appeal. See High, 573 S.W.3d at 812; Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 

510 n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 

Accordingly, under the authority of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.9(a) and 

(b), we STRIKE appellant’s brief and ABATE this matter to allow counsel to redraw the 

brief. Appellant is hereby ORDERED to file an amended brief with this Court that 

complies with the above rules within fifteen days from the date of this order. In 

accordance with Rule 38.1, the facts pertinent to the appeal and the issues and argument 

presented in the brief must be clear and concise, and the brief must be supported by 

record references.

If counsel files an amended brief that fails to comply with this order of the Court, 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the Anders guidelines, then the Court will 

abate the appeal for appointment of new appellate counsel. See id. 38.9(a). We must 

proceed as necessary to protect appellant’s rights on appeal and to obtain a satisfactory 

submission of the case. This appeal will be reinstated upon the expiration of fifteen days 
3

from the date of this order, or the date that appellant’s amended brief is filed, whichever 

occurs first.

It is so ordered.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

25th day of June, 2019.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Frank J. Prestifilippo, Deceased. Ross J. Incardone, Jr., as Executor of Frank J. Prestifilippo, Deceased, Respondent; Hugh Webster et al., Appellants.

[768 NYS2d 909]

— Appeal from an amended order of Surrogate’s Court, Monroe County (Calvaruso, S.), entered February 3, 2003, which, inter alia, denied the claims of respondents against the estate for room, board and other services provided to decedent.

It is hereby ordered that the amended order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Surrogate’s Court, Monroe County, Calvaruso, S. Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
# C_2014462EN.01002302.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2014 — Murnauer Markenvertrieb v OHIM — Healing Herbs (NOTFALL)

(Case T-188/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark NOTFALL - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Equal treatment))

(2014/C 462/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Murnauer Markenvertrieb GmbH (Egelsbach, Germany) (represented by: F. Traub and H. Daniel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Healing Herbs Ltd (Walterstone, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Price, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 February 2013 (Case R 132/2012-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Healing Herbs Ltd and Murnauer Markenvertrieb GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Murnauer Markenvertrieb GmbH to pay its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and by Healing Herbs Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Murnauer Markenvertrieb GmbH to pay its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and by Healing Herbs Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ C 156 of 1.6.2013.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marc Pringle, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 633]

Application by the *783appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 24, 2016 *(People v Pringle,*136 AD3d 1061 [2016]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 2, 2012.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Rivera, J.R, Leventhal, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-51224

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR ALBERTO GUZMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-01-CR-393-1

--------------------

June 19, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Oscar Alberto Guzman appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Guzman

complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his prior deportation following an

aggravated felony conviction. Guzman argues that the sentencing

provision violates the Due Process Clause because it permitted

the sentencing judge to find, under a preponderance of the

evidence standard, a fact which increased the statutory maximum
No. 01-51224

-2-

sentence to which he otherwise would have been exposed. Guzman

thus contends that his sentence is invalid and argues that it

should not exceed the two-year maximum term of imprisonment

prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Guzman acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court

must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court

itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

 AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 21

                            DYNCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES



Aerotherm Corporation
Anedyn, Inc.
Anedyn Power Company
AT/Mexico Holdings Inc.
Dyn Funding Corporation
Dyn Logistics Services Inc.
Dyn Marine Services, Inc.
Dyn Marine Services of Virginia, Inc.
Dyn/Mexico Holdings Inc.
Dyn Network Management, Inc.
Dyn Pacific Aerospace Services, Inc.
Dyn Realty Corporation
Dyn Systems Technology, Inc.
Dyn Trade Systems, Inc.
DynAir Technical Services, Inc.
Dynalectron Corporation
Dynalectron Systems Inc.
DynCIS, Inc.
DynComm 2000 LLC
DynCorp
DynCorp Advanced Repair Technology, Inc.
DynCorp Aerospace Operations Inc.
DynCorp Aerospace Operations (UK) Ltd.
DynCorp Aviation Services, Inc.
DynCorp Biotechnology and Health Services, Inc.
DynCorp Information & Enterprise Technology, Inc.
DynCorp Information Systems LLC
DynCorp International Services, GmbH
DynCorp International Services, Inc.
DynCorp International Services, Ltd.
DynCorp of Colorado, Inc.
DynCorp Panama, Inc.
DynCorp Procurement Systems, Inc.
DynCorp Property Management, Inc.
DynCorpServices.com, Inc.
DynCorp Technical Services, Inc.
DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc.
DynCorp Viar Inc.
DynCorp West Virginia Inc.
DynEDRS, Inc.
DynEx, Inc.
DynMeridian Corporation
DynPar LLC
DynSpace Corporation
DynTel Corporation
Electric Utility Construction, Inc.
FMAS Corporation
Grupo DynCorp de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
Kwajalein Services, Inc.
OLDHD Systems, Inc.
Pacific TSD Corporation
Sea Mobility Inc.
TAI Realty Corporation
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

The undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the“Company”) hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K(“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordance withclause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall notbe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.

 

 
| Date: August 8, 2005 |                                                                                                      |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | /s/ Thomas E. D’Ambra                                                                                |
|                 | Name: Thomas E. D’Ambra, Ph.D.  Title: Chairman of the Board, President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15673]



[[Page 32199]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP98-203-000 and RP98-203-001]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference

June 8, 1988.
    In the Commission's order issued on May 28, 1998, in the above 
referenced proceeding, the Commission directed that a technical 
conference be held to address issues raised by the filing.
    Take notice that the technical conference will be held on Tuesday, 
June 16, 1998, at 10:00 a.m., in a room to be designated at the offices 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
    All interested parties and staff are permitted to attend.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15673 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-423.

#### Javier Lopera, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1005, 131 S. Ct. 542,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8470.

178 L. Ed. 2d 375,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-5098.

#### Stephen P. Bowers, Petitioner v. Tom Scott, Administrator, Southwestern Regional Jail, et al.

562 U.S. 903, 131 S. Ct. 241,

178 L. Ed. 2d 160,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6294.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.

*161Same case below, 226 W. Va. 130, 697 S.E.2d 722.