alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer Required by Rule13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)**

**of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934**

I,Joseph Loggia, certify that:

(1)          I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q ofAdvanstar, Inc. (“the registrant”);

(2)          Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

(3)          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)          The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         [Reserved];

(c)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;

(5)          The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 8, 2007 |   |
|-------------------|--------|
|              | By:    | /s/ Joseph Loggia |   |
|              |   | Joseph Loggia |
|              |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |        |  |  |  |

 

----
No. 10-5269.

#### Lamont Coker, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 268,

178 L. Ed. 2d 177,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6872.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
No. 10-6103.

#### Terrence Ruben Shead, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1009, 131 S. Ct. 516,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8483.

178 L. Ed. 2d 382,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ELIDIO MEZA

- MORAS,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 24

- 2436
D.C. No. 4:21

- cr

- 01400

- JAS

- JR

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A

. Soto
, District Judge
, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024 **

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Elidio Meza

- Moras appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the revocation of supervised release and eight

- month sentence imposed

upon revocation

. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Meza

Moras ’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 2 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 24

- 2436 with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Meza

- Moras

the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
No. 10-5664.

#### Hunter R. Levi, Petitioner v. Aerotek, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 964, 131 S. Ct. 460,

178 L. Ed. 2d 293,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8034.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 374 Fed. Appx. 679.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2438 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2438

     To extend the authorities of the Overseas Private Investment 
     Corporation through fiscal year 1995, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 19 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

 Mr. Sarbanes introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the authorities of the Overseas Private Investment 
     Corporation through fiscal year 1995, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``OPIC Amendments Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. RAISING CEILING ON INSURANCE.

    Section 235(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2195(a)(1)) is amended by striking ``$9,000,000,000'' and inserting 
``$12,000,000,000''.

SEC. 3. RAISING CEILING ON INVESTMENT GUARANTEES.

    Section 235(a)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2195(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (B);
            (2) by striking ``(A)'' after ``Guarantees.--''; and
            (3) by striking ``$2,500,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$5,000,000,000''.

SEC. 4. EXTENDING ISSUING AUTHORITY.

    Section 235(a)(3) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2195(a)(3)) is amended by striking ``1994'' and inserting ``1995''.

SEC. 5. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.

    Section 235 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2195) 
is amended by striking subsection (g).
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-5063.

#### David Madison, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

562 U.S. 901, 131 S. Ct. 393,

178 L. Ed. 2d 157,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6106.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5704.

#### Bobbie Douglas Payne, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 935, 131 S. Ct. 343,

178 L. Ed. 2d 219,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7237.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 464.
No. D-2507.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Paula B. Hutchinson.

562 U.S. 809, 131 S. Ct. 399,

178 L. Ed. 2d 264,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7578.

October 4, 2010.

Paula B. Hutchinson, of Lincoln, Nebraska, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. D-2544.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Michael H Lubin.

562 U.S. 814, 131 S. Ct. 406,

178 L. Ed. 2d 270,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7527.

October 4, 2010.

Michael H Lubin, of N. Miami Beach, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7970

MARVIN DAVID MOORE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE P. DODSON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA95-770-R)

Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: December 2, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce McCoy Steen, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent

that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a

certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Moore v. Dodson, No. CA-95-770-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 1, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 10-219.

#### Pike County Joint Vocational School District, et al., Petitioners v. Misty Knisley, et al.

562 U.S. 962, 131 S. Ct. 498,

178 L. Ed. 2d 290,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8085.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 604 F.3d 977.
No. 10-32.

#### Barry Ceminchuk, Petitioner v. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States.

562 U.S. 890, 131 S. Ct. 245,

178 L. Ed. 2d 137,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7043,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.111 
  
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 Richard W. Reichow (“Employee”) and Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., formerly Incara Pharmaceuticals Corporation (the “Company”) hereby agree to amend
the terms of the Employment Agreement dated April 2, 2002, as amended on July 25, 2003, between the Company and the Employee (the “Agreement”) as follows. 
  
 Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is amended by adding the following sentence. 
  
 “After April 30, 2005, the Employee’s employment shall continue in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement on a month-to-month basis, which employment may be terminated at will by the Company upon thirty (30) days written notice. Provided however, if this Agreement is terminated by the Company or if the
Employee’s employment is terminated by the Company for any reason, other than for just cause as defined in Paragraph 7(A)(iii), the Employee shall be entitled to and receive the payments and benefits provided for in Paragraph 7(B) of the
Agreement.” 
  
 Except as set forth above, the provisions of the Agreement,
as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. 
  

					
	 /s/ Richard W. Reichow

	 	 	 	 December 2, 2004


	 Employee’s signature
	 	 	 	 Date

			
	 /s/ James D. Crapo

	 	 	 	 December 2, 2004


	 Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
	 	 	 	 Date

	 James D. Crapo
	 	 	 	 
	 Chief Executive Officer
No. 85-6677.

#### Trawick *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of Jerell P., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Qubilah G., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[66 NYS3d 136]

Order of fact-finding and disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sarah P. Cooper, J.), entered on or about October 27, 2016, which, upon granting petitioner agency’s motion for summary judgment, found that respondent mother had derivatively neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from decision and order, same court, Judge and date, which granted the motion for summary judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of fact-finding and disposition.

The agency made a prima facie showing of derivative neglect as to the subject child, based on prior orders finding that the mother had neglected and derivatively neglected her four older children *(see Matter of Camarrie B. [Maria R.],*107 AD3d 409 [1st Dept 2013]). The prior neglect findings, issued over a two-year period between 2014 and 2016, support a finding that the mother, by reason of her cognitive limitations and impaired judgment, was unable to care for any child *(see Matter of Phoenix J. [Kodee J.],*129 AD3d 603 [1st Dept 2015]; *Matter of T-Shauna K.,*63 AD3d 420 [1st Dept 2009]). Further, the conduct underlying the prior findings of neglect was sufficiently proximate in time to the derivative neglect proceeding to support the conclusion that the conditions still existed *(see T-Shauna*K., 63 AD3d at 420). Moreover, the repeated findings of neglect against the mother and her ongoing failure to participate in services as evidenced by the fact that her children were never returned to her care and by the transfer of guardianship, all established that the conditions that led to the prior findings still existed and that the child would be at risk *444in her care *(see Matter of Neveah AA. [Alia CC.],*124 AD3d 938 [3d Dept 2015]).

In opposition to the agency’s motion, the mother failed to rebut the presumption that the conditions leading the neglect of the child’s siblings had not been remedied *(see Matter of Phoenix J.*at 603-604).

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Kahn and Singh, JJ.
# FED project OS031 complete

/ Published Dec. 10, 2021
USAG HUMPHREYS, Republic of Korea, 
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Far East District commemorated the completion of project CY13 ROKFC IN-KIND Bulk Fuel Storage Tanks and Pumps (OS031), with an Acceptance Release Letter (ARL) ceremony in Pyeongtaek, Republic of Korea, Dec. 7.

The Defense Logistics Agency facility will serve to support the U.S. Forces Korea and Eighth Army’s warfighting missions.

“Completing this project will increase readiness by establishing the capability to bring millions of gallons of aviation fuel, by train, to multiple installations throughout the Republic of Korea,” said Jay Kim, an FED Security Operation Resident Office project engineer.

The fueling system is manually operated and must be manned to ensure the incoming and outgoing fuel is stored properly and filtered, providing quality fuel for transport to USFK aircraft.

The previous phase project, OS030, was a YRP/LH (Yongsan Relocation Program/ Korea Land and Housing) Corporation funded project, whereas OS031 is a ROK (Republic of Korea) In-Kind funded project.

“This is a big win, for the YRP Program and the ROK-U.S. Alliance. We faced some obstacles along with way coordinating with two different contractors during a pandemic,” said Kenith Ward, FED Security Operations Resident Office resident engineer.

The ARL signing signifies a milestone in a project, where the U.S. government accepts the substantially completed facility from the ROK government. A ceremony is held to commemorate the strength of the US-ROK alliance, which is demonstrated in the completed facility.

Defense Logistics Agency, the nation’s combat logistics support agency, manages the global supply chain –from raw materials to end user to disposition– for the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, Space Force, Coast Guard, 11 combatant commands, other federal agencies, and partner & allied nations.

USACE Far East District is the premier engineering, design, and construction agent for all DoD agencies in the Republic of Korea. Since its inception, the Far East District has played a critical role in the security and stability of the region and in strengthening the alliance between the US and the ROK. As such, it also fulfills a unique mission; the only “maneuver” district within USACE, FED must always be prepared for war, even while building for peace on the Korean peninsula. The Far East District is responsible for executing a multi-billion dollar program, the largest construction program managed by the U.S. Army.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the US Army Corps of Engineers Far East District website.*
# Employees encouraged to assess workspaces before January

/ Published Dec. 4, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
*Editor’s note: This is part of a series of articles aiming to help Defense Logistics Agency employees return to the office in January. The articles will address several areas, providing tips and information to ease the transition.*

A little preparation may ease the transition to working more often in the office starting this January.

Defense Logistics Agency Information Operations encourages the workforce, especially those who have not been at their workspaces for an extended time, to evaluate their office workspace before Jan. 2.

Users should make sure they have the equipment they need at their desks and test their network connection on site, said Nicolette Whitney, strategic communications team liaison for DLA Information Operations. She also suggested submitting requests for equipment or tickets for issues through the DLA Service Portal (internal DLA link) as early as possible.

“We know that not all employees have assigned spaces yet, but assessing IT needs when they do will not only help them to hit the ground running on Day One, it will give our information technology technicians ample time and resources to fulfill requests across the enterprise,” Whitney said.

Employees also should check if they are still mapped to the printers in their office, obtain wireless passwords (internal DLA link) that may have changed and log into their desk phone.

“The bottom line is, if you have the opportunity to test these things prior to coming back into the office, it will make that return a lot smoother,” she said.

Information Operations has a comprehensive website (internal DLA link) with frequently asked questions and other information to make the shift back into the office easier.

The directorate also is anticipating a surge in headset requests and has a robust stock in inventory to meet the demand, said Sara Moore, division chief for strategic communications and knowledge management with DLA Information Operations. Requests for headsets must be made through the DLA Service Portal.

Employees are allowed to connect with their own wired headsets, but Bluetooth and wireless headsets are not authorized, she added.

The DLA Service Portal also is a resource for outage information and service catalog requests such as IT support for conference rooms, new equipment requests and more, Whitney said. The portal includes announcements and banners with information about trending IT topics and issues as well as a library of knowledge-based articles to help employees troubleshoot common issues themselves, Moore added.

Employees who were previously directed to move their workstations should update their information and new location in the ID Card Office Online, (internal DLA link) she added.
# Aviation team members share Filipino culture at NAS Jacksonville 

/ Published Aug. 5, 2015
JACKSONVILLE, Florida, On July 22, employees at Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Jacksonville, Florida participated in the Naval Air Station (NAS) Jacksonville's Multicultural Fun Day at the base's marina pavilion. Fourteen DLA Aviation employees assembled a display highlighting the Philippines and Filipino culture. They also shared information about their culture with curious attendees.Thirteen information stations provided educational materials, display items and food samples to employees, family members and visitors during the event. In addition to bouncy houses for children to enjoy, there were many items and information from base service groups. Participants experienced an array of information from various other countries and cultures including Jamaica, Russia, Ireland, Latin America, Germany, Bahrain, Uganda, Egypt, and the United States.DLA Aviation at Jacksonville is one of six DLA Aviation industrial support sites supporting the warfighter through industrial retail supply and strategic acquisition, and weapon system material management for consumable and depot-level repairable material.
**
No. 10-6198.

#### Jeffrey D. Leiser, Petitioner v. Michael Thurmer, Warden.

562 U.S. 971, 131 S. Ct. 483,

178 L. Ed. 2d 305,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7988,

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 367 Fed. Appx. 691.
No. 10-6854.

#### Henry Lamont Reid, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1035, 131 S. Ct. 582,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8715.

178 L. Ed. 2d 424,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 392.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2213

To make applicable the provisions of the Act commonly known as the ‘‘Warren

Act’’ to the Central Utah Project, Utah, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 20 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. BENNETT (for himself and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To make applicable the provisions of the Act commonly

known as the ‘‘Warren Act’’ to the Central Utah Project,

Utah, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF THE WARREN ACT.

4 (a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Interior

5 may—

6 (1) enter into contracts with private entities

7 pursuant to the Act of February 21, 1911 (com8 monly known as the ‘‘Warren Act’’) (36 Stat. 925

9 et seq., chapter 141; 43 U.S.C. 523), for the im-
2

•S 2213 IS

1 pounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject water

2 for domestic, municipal, fish and wildlife, industrial,

3 and other beneficial purposes, using any facilities as4 sociated with the Central Utah Project, Utah; and

5 (2) enter into agreements, under terms and

6 conditions authorized for contracts under such Act,

7 with appropriate officials of other Federal agencies,

8 municipalities, public water districts and agencies,

9 and States for impounding, storage, and carriage of

10 nonproject water for purposes described in para11 graph (1) using facilities referred to in such para12 graph.

13 (b) NONPROJECT WATER DEFINED.—In subsection

14 (a), the term ‘‘nonproject water’’ means water that is not

15 from a Federal Reclamation project.

Æ