alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Cedric Kushner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc. and will be retained by Cedric
Kushner Promotions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





/s/ Cedric Kushner
--------------------------------------------------------
Name: Cedric Kushner
Title: Chief Executive Officer



Date: January 11, 2004
# DLA Land and Maritime associate draws on military experience to excel in acquisition field

/ Published March 8, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, During her two tours in Afghanistan Deonna Coleman witnessed firsthand the importance of supply acquisition and distribution. As a Soldier responsible for the safe detention of suspected Taliban fighters, Coleman saw the results of contract development and supply chain management. Now a Level II Purchasing Agent for Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, Coleman no longer wears a military uniform but remembers well the necessity of efficient supply logistics. “Supply is a huge function over there. It’s not like we can just go to the store and get something. We have to rely on our supply chain the entire time we’re deployed,” Coleman said. Coleman tells part of her story in the latest installment of a nine-part acquisition professional video series highlighting the contributions made by a variety of DLA associates in the acquisition field. Her position as purchasing agent requires her to scrutinize vendors through various tools including the Vendor Performance History (VPH) and Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) to help identify the best products on the market. In Coleman’s case, that includes specialized micro-circuits.With no formal background in circuitry or electronics, it may seem unusual to chose this field to specialize in, but she credits her training and team with her success in the industry.“Without their help, without their knowledge, without their expertise from doing this for so long, it would’ve been much more difficult,” Coleman said. “Working alongside product specialists and with guidance from my supervisor though, it was a group effort. It was tough, but I wanted the challenge.”Coleman acknowledged she continues to learn and improve through training and working with those associates on her team. Drawing on the expertise of those around her and through her own experiences as a Soldier on the battlefield provides the Columbus, Ohio native with the skills to execute her mission.“Somebody’s out there protecting us. That used to be me,” Coleman said. “Now their safety is in my hands.”To view Deonna Coleman’s video, visit DLA’s YouTube page or the DLA Facebook page.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2518 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2518

                 For the relief of Ang Tsering Sherpa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 6 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

 Mr. Hatfield introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Ang Tsering Sherpa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Ang Tsering 
Sherpa shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to 
the United States for permanent residence as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ang Tsering Sherpa as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by one number during the current fiscal year the 
total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
No. 92-8186.

#### Dishmey *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
906 CERTIFICATION

EXHIBIT 32.2

Date: May 13, 2004

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of GiveMePower
Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jim
Bolokoski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                  /S/ Jim Bolokoski
                                                      -------------
                                                      Jim Bolokoski
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014045EN.01003302.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/33

---

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-204/13 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil service - Action at first instance dismissed as manifestly inadmissible - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for brining proceedings and signed by a seal reproducing the lawyer’s signature - Original application lodged out of time - Action out of time - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2014/C 45/56

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 28 January 2013 in Case F-95/12 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.

Marcuccio

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Witold Iwanczyk, Appellant.

[55 NYS3d 420]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lopez, J.), rendered May 21, 2014, convicting him of burglary in the first degree (two counts), assault in the second degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant preserved for appellate review his contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he committed assault in the second degree and failed to preserve for appellate review his contentions that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he committed burglary in the first degree (two counts), sexual abuse in the first degree, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree (two counts) *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484 [2008]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995]; *People v Edwards,*81 AD3d 848 [2011]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of burglary in the first degree (two counts), assault in the second degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree (two counts). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo, 2*NY3d 383 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdicts of guilt as to those crimes were not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair *746trial by certain of the prosecutor’s actions is without merit. The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor improperly elicited inferential hearsay testimony from a police detective, which bolstered the complainant’s testimony, is without merit. The detective’s descriptions of a “walk through” of the crime scene and where specific items relevant to the crime were found were properly admitted for the relevant, nonhearsay purpose of “establishing the reasons behind” the detective’s actions, and “to complete the narrative of events leading to the defendant’s arrest” *(People v Ragsdale,*68 AD3d 897, 897-898 [2009]; *cf. People v Rosario,*100 AD3d 660 [2012]). Moreover, the prosecutor’s summation remarks challenged by the defendant were within the broad bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in closing arguments, fair comment on the evidence, or responsive to arguments and theories presented in the defense’s summation *(see People v Halm,*81 NY2d 819 [1993]; *People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396 [1981]; *People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105 [1976]).

Hall, J.P., Sgroi, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Nathalie D.N., Also Known as Nathalie N. and Another. New York Foundling Hospital, Respondent; Nathaniel H.N. IV, Also Known as Nathaniel H.N. and Another, Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[51 NYS3d 167]

Appeal by the father from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Arnold Lim, J.), dated March 1, 2016. The order denied the father’s motion to vacate his default in appearing at a fact-finding hearing wherein the court determined that his consent to the adoption of the subject child is not required pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 111.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In this proceeding to terminate parental rights pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, the father’s sole contention is that the Family Court should have vacated his default in appearing at a fact-finding hearing wherein the court determined that his consent to the adoption of the subject child is not required pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 111. The determination of whether to relieve a party of a default is a matter left to the sound discretion of the Family Court *(see Matter of Annette J.S.J. [Rebecca F.],*106 AD3d 1087, 1087 [2013]; *Matter of Joseph N.,*45 AD3d 849, 849 [2007]). In a proceeding to terminate parental rights, a parent must show that there was a reasonable excuse for the default and a potentially meritori*751ous defense in order to establish his or her entitlement to vacatur of the default *(see*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; *Matter of Isabella R.W. [Jessica W. ],*142 AD3d 503, 504 [2016]; *Matter of Joshua E.R. [Yolaine R.],*123 AD3d 723, 725 [2014]; *Matter of Stephen Daniel A. [Sandra M.-A.],*122 AD3d 837, 839 [2014]). Contrary to the father’s contention, he failed to provide a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear. He failed to present detailed information or documentation to substantiate his claim of a delay in transportation, and he did not explain his failure to contact his attorney or the court about the alleged delay *(see Matter of Joshua E.R. [Yolaine RJ,*123 AD3d at 724-725; *Matter of Ilyas Zaire A.-R. [Habita A.-R.],*104 AD3d 512, 513 [2013]; *cf. Matter of Arianna-Samantha Lady Melissa S. [Carissa S.],*134 AD3d 582, 583 [2015]; *Matter of Nathalie A.,*145 AD2d 629, 630 [1988]). Since the father failed to establish a reasonable excuse for his default, we need not reach the issue of whether he presented a potentially meritorious defense to the relief sought in the petition *(see Matter of Stephen Daniel A. [Sandra M.-A.],*122 AD3d at 839; *Matter of Miguel M.-R.B.,*36 AD3d 613, 614 [2007]). Accordingly, the court providently exercised its discretion in denying the father’s motion to vacate his default.

Mastro, J.P., Sgroi, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.
# Bagram workers light up the night

/ Published Sept. 30, 2020
BAGRAM, Afghanistan, Bagram, Afghanistan
Defense Logistics Agency employees recently defied the darkness of the Afghan night to keep important cargo moving.

Dave Ross, DLA Disposition Services site manager at Bagram Airfield, said the recent night operations were needed to support a special request from the local Central Receiving and Shipping Point yard.

“The BAF Commander instituted a clean-sweep and the volume of containers increased dramatically at the CRSP yard,” Ross said. “The containers needed to be moved and were competing heavily for daytime transportation movement requests throughout the site.”

Ross said his team worked out a schedule to meet the base’s objectives and maximize evening transportation and movement requests. He said volunteers rotate through the evening schedule for the duration of the agreement, which was recently extended to Nov. 3. He said his team is scheduled to receive 30 containers three times a week during this period.

Team members volunteering to support the night operations include Victor Ambegia, Jeffrey Dixon, Larry Leach, Justina Luna, Mel Proulx and Jacob Suazo.
No. 10-6276.

#### James S. McClellan, Petitioner v. Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

562 U.S. 987, 131 S. Ct. 426,

178 L. Ed. 2d 332,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8172,

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# C_2013352EN.01002801.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/28

---

Action brought on 23 September 2013 — ZZ and Others v European Railway Agency (ERA)

(Case F-95/13)

2013/C 352/54

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Railway Agency (ERA)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to not reclassify the applicants’ employment contracts as members of the temporary staff for a fixed-term as an employment contracts for an indefinite duration.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision rejecting the applicants’ application of 20 December 2012 seeking to reclassify their employment contracts as members of the temporary staff for a fixed-term for the purposes of Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants of the European Communities (CEOS) as employment contracts for an indefinite duration under Article 8 of the CEOS from the date of their actual entry into force; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision rejecting the applicants’ application of 20 December 2012 seeking to reclassify their employment contracts as members of the temporary staff for a fixed-term for the purposes of Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants of the European Communities (CEOS) as employment contracts for an indefinite duration under Article 8 of the CEOS from the date of their actual entry into force;

| — | order the European Railway Agency to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Railway Agency to pay the costs.

---
No. 10-6534.

#### Rogelio Galvan Chavez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 990, 131 S. Ct. 436,

178 L. Ed. 2d 338,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8232.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*339Same case below, 584 F.3d 1354.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2155

To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the cost

of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Mr. HATFIELD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

JUNE 29 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Committee discharged

A BILL

To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal

share of the cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at Oregon State University

in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Forest Ecosystem Re5 search Laboratory Authorization Act of 1994’’.
2

S 2155 CDS

1 SEC. 2. FOREST ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the availability of

3 funds appropriated under subsection (c), the Secretary of

4 Agriculture, acting through the Cooperative State Re5 search Service, shall provide the Federal share of the cost

6 of planning and constructing a Forest Ecosystem Re7 search Laboratory at Oregon State University in Corvallis,

8 Oregon.

9 (b) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share provided

10 under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.

11 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

12 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section

13 $10,000,000, to remain available until expended.

Æ
No. 10-5525.

#### In re Thomas Martin Sukup, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 313,

178 L. Ed. 2d 260,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7779.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2406 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2406

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 17, United States Code, relating to the definition of a 
  local service area of a primary transmitter, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2406

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 17, United States Code, relating to the definition of a 
  local service area of a primary transmitter, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOCAL SERVICE AREA OF A PRIMARY TRANSMITTER.

    (a) In General.--Section 111(f) of title 17, United States Code, is 
amended in the paragraph relating to the definition of ``local service 
area of a primary transmitter''--
            (1) by striking out ``comprises the area'' and inserting in 
        lieu thereof ``comprises either the area''; and
            (2) by inserting after ``April 15, 1976,'' the following: 
        ``or such station's television market as defined in section 
        76.55(e) of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect 
        on September 18, 1993), or any subsequent modifications to such 
        television market made pursuant to section 76.55(e) or 76.59 of 
        title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made under subsection (a), 
relating to the definition of the local service area of a primary 
transmitter, shall take effect on July 1, 1994.

            Passed the Senate August 18, 1994.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

Assigned on Briefs August 24, 2010

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSHUA LEE ARP

 Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sevier County

Nos. 14167-III, 14238-III Rex Henry Ogle, Judge

No. E2010-00371-CCA-R3-CD - Filed September 29, 2010

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, P.J., concurring.

I concur in the results reached in the majority opinion. However, I would affirm the

trial court because of the defendant’s failure to include the trial transcript in the record and

the attendant presumption that the trial court’s determinations were correct. See State v.

Oody, 823 S.W.2d 554 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991) (holding trial court’s ruling presumed

correct in the absence of an adequate record on appeal). The 1989 Sentencing Act, as

amended, requires a sentencing court to consider evidence received at the trial. T.C.A. § 40-

35-210(b)(1). Absent the trial transcript, it is impossible for us to do a de novo review of the

matters relevant to sentencing.

____________________________________

JOSEPH M.TIPTON, PRESIDING JUDGE
<PAGE>
21.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

CBS Complete Business Solutions (Mauritius) Limited              Mauritius
CBSI Financial Services Corporation                              Michigan
CBSI Europe, N.V.                                                Belgium
CBSI Luxembourg S.A.                                             Luxembourg
Complete Business Solutions (India) Limited                      India
BPR Management S.A.                                              Belgium
CBSI Belgium                                                     Belgium
BPR Belgium                                                      Belgium
CBSI Philippines, Inc.                                           Philippines
CBSI Canada, Inc.                                                Canada
Complete Business Solutions Australia Pty Limited                Australia
E-Business Solutions.com, Inc.                                   Delaware
Complete Business Solutions (Singapore) Pte Ltd                  Singapore
CBSI Germany                                                     Germany
CBSI France                                                      France
Complete Business Solutions Netherlands B.V.                     Netherlands