alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Puget Sound employee art showcases “warfighter first” focus

/ Published Oct. 8, 2015
PUGET SOUND, Washington, 
Thanks to the talents of one employee, the DLA Distribution Puget Sound, Wash., workforce has a permanent reminder of the mission they serve.
Dedicating more than 30 hours of his own time, quality assurance supervisor Rosauro Aldana hand painted three murals spanning the organization’s command suite.  The art depicts an interpretation of the DLA logo, the American flag, and the landscape of nearby Mt. Rainer. 

Aldana, who has sketched and painted since he was a child, said he was first inspired to paint the waving American flag to serve as a background to photos of the military service’s logos, currently on order to be added to the wall.  Once the first piece was finished, however, he noticed the other walls in the area seemed barren.  “I decided to paint the second wall to represent the DLA flag, with the eagle and 13 stars.”  The third wall was then completed, featuring the Pacific Northwest.  

Despite the praise he has received for his work, Aldana says he doesn’t consider himself good at drawing or painting; he simply finds it entertaining.  However, this is not his publicly showcased work.  “I did a lot [of drawing and painting] back in the Philippines before I enlisted in the Navy and during my early years while stationed onboard Navy ships and shore commands.  I have also contributed sketches to the Navy Personnel Command's magazine ‘LINK.’”  

Aldana’s efforts do not go unappreciated.  “Ross is very talented.  His art complements the office very nicely and provides a visual reminder of our ‘warfighter first’ focus,” said DLA Distribution Puget Sound commander Navy Cmdr. Mark Peace.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Hopson, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 879]

— Appeal from a judgment of Monroe County Court (Maloy, J.), entered January 21, 1998, convicting defendant after a nonjury trial of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a bench trial of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]) and criminal possession a weapon in the second degree (§ 265.03 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). “The credibility determinations of County Court are entitled to great deference . . ., and there is no basis to conclude that the court failed to give the evidence the weight that it should be accorded” *(People v Scott,*289 AD2d 974, 975 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 733 [2002]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
No. 10-5892.

#### Jerald Jerome Dorsey, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 940, 131 S. Ct. 356,

178 L. Ed. 2d 230,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7164.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# C_2015026EN.01002702.xml

| 26.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 December 2014 — BSH v OHIM — LG Electronics (compressor technology)

(Case T-595/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark compressor technology - Earlier national word marks KOMPRESSOR - Relative ground for refusal - Partial refusal to register - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 026/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Biagosch, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Fischer and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 September 2013 (Case R 1176/2012-1), concerning opposition proceedings between LG Electronics, Inc. and BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.

1

---
# C_2015381EN.01005702.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/57

---

Order of the General Court of 28 August 2015 — Bimbo v OHIM — Kimbo (Caffé KIMBO Espresso Napoletano)

(Case T-569/13) (1)

1

(2015/C 381/68)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
#### Linda Greenstein et al., Appellants, v Sol S. Stolzenberg, D.M.D., P.C., et al., Defendants, and Tatyana Berman, D.D.S., Respondent.

[64 NYS3d 884]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about December 28, 2016, which granted the *466motion of defendant Tatyana Berman, D.D.S. (Berman) to dismiss the complaint as against her as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the complaint as against Berman was proper since the alleged malpractice occurred in 2003 and 2007, and the action was not commenced until January 2016, which was well beyond the applicable statute of limitations *(see*CPLR 214-a). The record establishes that Berman performed root canal work on two separate occasions to address plaintiff Linda Greenstein’s emergent pain issues. These root canal therapies constituted isolated and discrete procedures, and as such, the continuous treatment doctrine does not apply to the treatment of these teeth to toll the statute of limitations *(see Marrone v Klein,*33 AD3d 546 [1st Dept 2006]).

Plaintiffs’ contention that the motion court should have allowed them to conduct further discovery under CPLR 3211 (d) so that they could investigate the details of the patient’s treatment plan is unavailing. The motion court permitted plaintiffs to depose Berman on the limited issue of continuous treatment, and plaintiffs were also in possession of the patient’s complete dental records. Moreover, the patient, who failed to submit an affidavit in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss, should have facts regarding any treatment plan available to her as the recipient of the allegedly negligent dental services.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Renwick, Gische, Oing and Singh, JJ.
No. 09-1367.

#### Martin Rosillo-Puga, aka Martin Puga, aka Martin Rosillo, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 1002, 131 S. Ct. 502,

178 L. Ed. 2d 369,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8520.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 580 F.3d 1147.
No. 10-6626.

#### Cordell Duane Broadus, Petitioner, v. Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 1068, 131 S. Ct. 654,

178 L. Ed. 2d 490,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9218.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh Office, denied.

Same case below, 990 A.2d 37.
# C_2015205EN.01003101.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/31

---

Order of the General Court of 23 April 2015 — Chatzianagnostou v Council and Others

(Case T-383/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Common Foreign and Security Policy - Seconded National expert for the EULEX Kosovo mission - Decisions of a Head of Mission on disciplinary sanctions))

(2015/C 205/41)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Antonios Chatzianagnostou (Serres, Greece) (represented by: C. Makris, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Kyriakopoulou, A. Vitro and M. Bauer, acting as Agents) European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, A.-C. Simon and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents); and Eulex Kosovo (Pristina, Kosovo) (represented by: B. Borchardt, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Fouquet, lawyer)

Defendants:

Re

Re

Action for annulment of decisions of 10 May 2013 in disciplinary cases Nos 02/2013 and 06/2013, signed by the Head of the EULEX Kosovo mission.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1) | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2) | Mr Antonios Chatzianagnostou is ordered to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, the European Commission and Eulex Kosovo. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Mr Antonios Chatzianagnostou is ordered to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, the European Commission and Eulex Kosovo.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.

1

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.3
 
 LETTER AMENDMENT
  To
    
    Bank of America, N.A.,
as Collateral Agent under
the Security Agreement
referred to below
  Security Agreement Borrower Holdings
      Remainder of page intentionally left blank.
 1




---



##### 



Very truly yours,
CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.By
    /s/ Robert J. Irving, Jr.Name:Title: LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.By
    /s/ Robert J. Irving, Jr.Name:Title: 
 2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



LEAP PCS MEXICO, INC.By
    /s/ Robert J. Irving, Jr.Name:Title: Agreed as of the date first above written:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
as Collateral AgentBy
    /s/ Scott ConnerName: Scott ConnerTitle:   Vice President 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NETWORK-1 SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,590,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  508,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (171,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     15,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,195,000
<PP&E>                                       1,194,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (544,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,852,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,299,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,000
<COMMON>                                        44,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,503,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,852,000
<SALES>                                         70,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               383,000
<CGS>                                          152,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  466,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,812,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,830,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,830,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,830,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
        

</TABLE>
Order issued July 29 , 201 5 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

________________________________________

No. 05

- 1 4

- 0 1452

- CR

________________________________________

DAVID BRADLEY NEWTON , Appellant



### V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee



### O R D E R

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Brown and Stoddart

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the March 31, 2015 motion of

Julie Woods for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk of

the Court to remove Julie Woods as counsel of record for appellant. We DIRECT the Clerk of

the Court to send a copy of this order and all future correspondence to David Bradley Newton

,

Bookin N o. 14061749, North Tower 4E04, Dallas County Jail, P. O. Box 660334, Dallas, Texas,

75266

- 0334.

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
No. 10-214.

#### Richard Fraterrigo, Petitioner v. Akal Security, Inc.

562 U.S. 1054, 131 S. Ct. 598,

178 L. Ed. 2d 453,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8818.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 40.
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rajeev Madhavan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



/S/    RAJEEV
MADHAVANRajeev Madhavan Chief Executive OfficerNovember 9, 2006




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Form
10-Q for the period ending October 1, 2006 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
No. 10-6237.

#### Ivan L. Matthews, Petitioner v. A. K. Scribner, Warden.

562 U.S. 1013, 131 S. Ct. 527,

178 L. Ed. 2d 388,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8581.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# Distribution Oklahoma’s Team of the Quarter

/ Published April 14, 2016
OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma, 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Oklahoma City, Okla. Stock Readiness Team has been awarded the Team of the Quarter award for their “lean” work operation.

This 12-person team established a plan to “lean” the operation by analyzing their workload, metrics, and backload.  As a result, they were able to formulate a plan to quickly process 822 special inspection requests and cyclical inspections by assigning two team members full time to work the issue.

The team approach has impacted several other areas as well to include training.  Training was requested to bring the distribution center in line with the standardized procedures.  The cyclical inspections were directly impacted from the extra training as the team learned procedures that were previously unknown.  The training enabled the team to reduce unnecessary steps.  Cyclical inspections are now completed in the first 10 days of the month, which reduces follow-up work routinely received for unfinished or late work.  The 1,500 visual inspections received on a monthly basis are now completed on time.  During the past quarter, dispositions were worked in less than two days.  This focused approach has increased employee productivity as well as positive interactions with the customer.  

The team handles over 1,000 emails monthly and builds the special inspection requests and supply discrepancy report inspections from the requests for materiel action.  The workload averages 25-40 priority dispositions daily.  As a result, this action has brought the team’s workload within the established metric while decreasing follow-up email by over 90 percent.  Effective time management has given this team quality time to focus on other customer related production goals.

“This team has worked so diligently to improve processes for our customers.  They are very deserving of this award,” said Ned La Violette, director of the distribution center.
No. 10-5388.

#### Ellva Slaughter, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 919, 131 S. Ct. 289,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7337.

178 L. Ed. 2d 189,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 10-6797.

#### Orlan Hernan Valle, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 549,

178 L. Ed. 2d 402,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8385.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 332.
164 A.3d 388

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANKLIN JACK BURR, II, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 16, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6371

BENJAMIN ROSS DOWNEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairperson, VPB, Official;

GENE JOHNSON, Director; MARK R. WARNER,

Governor; JAMES A. SISK, Manager, Official,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate

Judge. (3:05-cv-00546-MHL)

Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 29, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Ross Downey, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). 

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Ross Downey appeals the magistrate judge’s

order*

 denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate

judge. Downey v. Fahey, No. 3:05-cv-00546-MHL (E.D. Va. Feb. 27,

2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
*December 20,*2017

2017-Ohio-9111.]

2017-0442.

#### State ex rel. Mars Urban Solutions, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal Officer.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss of respondents Fiscal Officer of Cuyahoga County and Cuyahoga County Board of Revision. Motion granted in part and denied in part and alternative writ granted as to claim for relief IV only. Pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 12.05, the parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days, relators shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence, respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relators’ brief, and relators may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents’ brief.

Motion to dismiss of respondent Board of Tax Appeals denied as moot.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
No. D-2555.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Robert L. Shepherd.

562 U.S. 816, 131 S. Ct. 408,

178 L. Ed. 2d 272,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7505.

October 4, 2010.

Robert L. Shepherd, of Stuart, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lawrence P. LaBrew, on Behalf of Quamari McAllister, Petitioner, v Eric Gonzalez et al., Respondents.

[57 NYS3d 907]

Writ of ha-beas corpus in the nature of an application for the release of Quamari McAllister pursuant to CPL 30.30 (2) (a) in connection with Kings County indictment No. 6013/15.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Habeas corpus relief does not lie, as Quamari McAllister is no longer being detained *(see People ex rel. Wilder v Markley,*26 NY2d 648 [1970]; *People ex rel. Lawrence v Kluewer,*148 AD3d 942 [2017]).

Leventhal, J.P., LaSalle, Brathwaite Nelson and Christopher, JJ., concur.
#### Com. v. McClelland23

04/12/2016

460 WAL (2015)

23

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.; Justice DONOHUE notes her dissent.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 105
No. 10-85.

#### Barry Scheur, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

562 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 504,

178 L. Ed. 2d 407,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8409.

November 1, 2010.

Motion of respondent Robert McMillan for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 600 F.3d 434.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2393

To eliminate a maximum daily diversion restriction with respect to the

pumping of certain water from Lake Powell, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 16 (legislative day, AUGUST 11), 1994

Mr. DECONCINI (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To eliminate a maximum daily diversion restriction with respect to the pumping of certain water from Lake Powell,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF 24-HOUR RESTRICTION.

4 The second sentence of section 104(c) of the Rec5 lamation Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93–493;

6 88 Stat. 1488) is amended by striking ‘‘or three million

7 gallons of water in any twenty-four hour period,’’.

Æ
2016-1891.

#### State v. Martin.

Summit App. No. 27789, 2016-Ohio-7764.

O’Connor, C.J., and Kennedy and DeWine, JJ., dissent.
No. 10-5097.

#### Marco Bates, Petitioner v. McKiether Bodison, Warden.

562 U.S. 903, 131 S. Ct. 240,

178 L. Ed. 2d 160,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6225.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 335.
No. 10-276.

#### Robert C. Bruner, et al., Petitioners v. Bert Hartsfield, in His Official Capacity as Property Appraiser of Leon County, Florida, et al.

562 U.S. 1062, 131 S. Ct. 646,

178 L. Ed. 2d 479,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9221.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 23 So. 3d 192.