alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15907]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-591-000]


Kern River Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

June 10, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 3, 1998, Kern River Gas Transmission 
Company (Kern River), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, 
filed in Docket No. CP98-591-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 
and 157.211, of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) for authorization to amend the approval 
previously received in Docket No. CP97-617-000 in order to reflect a 
revision in the ownership arrangements for the authorized Primm Meter 
Station under Kern River's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP89-2048-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more 
fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection.
    Kern River states that pursuant to a superseding facilities 
agreement, it now proposes to own only the mainline tap and Southwest 
Gas will own the remainder of the Primm Meter Station which Kern River 
will construct as previously authorized. Kern River further states 
that, pursuant to an operating agreement with Southwest Gas, it will 
operate the meter facilities owned by Southwest Gas as part of Kern 
River's open-access transmission system.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15907 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
M. Cavins, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jeffrey M. Cavins

Jeffrey M. Cavins
Chief Executive Officer and President
August 8, 2003

                                       -5-
# C_2013123EN.01002501.xml

| 27.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/25

---

Action brought on 13 March 2013 — Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology v Commission

(Case T-146/13)

2013/C 123/43

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology LLC (Shaoxing, China) (represented by: V. Akritidis and Y. Melin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the decision of the European Commission communicated by letter of 3 January 2013, No H4/JN/Ref.t13.000011, informing the applicant that it would not examine the applicant’s request to be granted the status of undertaking operating under market economy conditions, filed pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, in the antidumping proceeding concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components originating in the People’s Republic of China, opened on 6 September 2012 (AD 590); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the decision of the European Commission communicated by letter of 3 January 2013, No H4/JN/Ref.t13.000011, informing the applicant that it would not examine the applicant’s request to be granted the status of undertaking operating under market economy conditions, filed pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, in the antidumping proceeding concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components originating in the People’s Republic of China, opened on 6 September 2012 (AD 590);

| — | Declare inapplicable to the applicant as regards the present application, by virtue of Article 277 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Regulation (EU) No 1168/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 2012 L 344, p. 1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare inapplicable to the applicant as regards the present application, by virtue of Article 277 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Regulation (EU) No 1168/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 2012 L 344, p. 1);

| — | And, consequently, order the Commission and any interveners to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

And, consequently, order the Commission and any interveners to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law identical to that raised in Case T-143/13 Zhejiang Heda Solar Technology v Commission.

Zhejiang Heda Solar Technology

Commission

---
# C_2013367EN.01004003.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/40

---

Action brought on 3 October 2013 — ZZ v Parliament

(Case F-98/13)

2013/C 367/72

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Salerno and B. Cortese, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision drawing up the list of officials promoted in 2012 in so far as, firstly, it does not include the name of the applicant among the officials in grade AST 6, not attested, promoted to grade AST 7 and, secondly, it includes the name of another official.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority drawing up the list officials promoted in 2012 in so far as, firstly, it does not include the name of the applicant among the officials in grade AST 6, not attested, promoted to grade AST 7 and, secondly, it includes the name of another official; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority drawing up the list officials promoted in 2012 in so far as, firstly, it does not include the name of the applicant among the officials in grade AST 6, not attested, promoted to grade AST 7 and, secondly, it includes the name of another official;

| — | Order the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Parliament to pay the costs.

---
### HELICOPTER S

Doubl e M Helicopter s Inc . 1 9 MA Y201 1 24 2 Pirate s Loo p S. E Mandan,N D 5855 4 U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n Docke t Managemen t Facilit y 120 0 Ne wJerse yAv e S.E . Wes t Building , Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-14 0 «.'" > •

• ' U' I ' •" : ! • I'll. ' , < ; •:. • •. . . I.; , - i , -^ij - Washington , DC 2059 0 RE : Doubl yM HelicoptersUnc , Petitiri n fa ; ^emptio n from . 14,CF R Part120.117 , (a) , (2) . , j / , Pursuan t t o 1 4 CF

R 11.16(b ) an d 11.81 , Doubl e M Helicopter s In chereb ypetition s fo ra n exemptio n fro m th e requiremen t for. a separat e Dru g an d Alcoho l Misus e Preventio n progran j fo rpar t91.147(a ) operations . . . . i , ; . . ] i Doubl e M Helicopter s Inc , locate d th e addres s above » currentl yoperat^^ unde ra par t135.Ai rCarrie r certificat e an d a 1 4 CFR 91.14 7 lette ro fauthorization . Bot h ar e operate d b yth e sam e singl e pilo t\ operato ran d th e onl yperso n o n eac h authorizatio n participate s i n DMH' s Part13 5 Dru g an d Alcoho l Misus e Preventio n Program . Havin g a n additiona l progra m fo rth e on e an d onl yperso n unde rth e certificate s wil l provid e n o increas e i n safet yt o th e public . Separat e an d thu s dua l Dru g an d Alcoho l wil l onl yIncreas e th e cos t t o DMH' s operatjon s an d tjiu s the,flyip g publi cwith,ou, tprovidin g an yincreas e i n safety . Ther e i s onl yon e perso n t o test , myself , a s th e compan ypresiden tan d onl ypilot . OM H ensure s tha t al l safet ysensitiv e personne l use d o n a contractua l basi s ar e covere d b ya Dru g an d Alcoho l Misus e an d Preventio n Progra m an d as such, ( maintain s an d equivalen tleve l o fsafet yfo rth e flyin g public . ^ I n Summary , Doubl e M Helicopter s In cseeks a n exemptio n fro m th e requiremen tunde r1 4 CF R 120tll7Xa) , (2 ) fortw o separat e Dru g an d Alcoho l (Misus e Pr^ventip n Program s unde ron e compan yan d management . You rattentio n t o thi s matte ri s greatl yappreciated . Mont e R. Myer s President , Doubl e M Helicopter s Inc .
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Morgan K. OBrien, as Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



WITNESS the due execution hereof this 24th day of March, 2005.



/s/    MORGAN K.
OBRIENMorgan K. OBrien President and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                     11,427,000
<SECURITIES>                               10,117,000         
<RECEIVABLES>                              10,338,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  909,000
<INVENTORY>                                75,239,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          109,416,000 
<PP&E>                                    266,296,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            158,253,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            253,914,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      92,633,000
<BONDS>                                   100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      115,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 29,546,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              253,914,000
<SALES>                                   719,520,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          719,520,000
<CGS>                                     536,822,000         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             536,822,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          8,666,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,703,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,703,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                2,703,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.24
        





</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREG HATTO,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

HOME DEPOT USA, INC.,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-55302

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-05156-SVWMRW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 9, 2014

Pasadena, California

Before: REINHARDT and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, Senior

District Judge.** 

Home Depot terminated Greg Hatto’s employment on the stated ground that

Hatto had threatened to harm a coworker. Hatto sued, contending that this reason

FILED

JAN 28 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

1
was merely pretext and that he was in fact fired in retaliation for having reported

that same coworker for violating Home Depot’s return policy. Hatto raises three

claims under California law: wrongful termination in violation of public policy,

breach of an implied contract to terminate for good cause only, and defamation.

The district court granted summary judgment to Home Depot, and we affirm.

Hatto’s claim that he was wrongfully terminated in violation of public policy

fails as a matter of law because his activity of reporting his coworker benefitted

only Home Depot, and not the public. “When an employee’s disclosure of

information to his employer serves only the employer’s private interest, the

employee has not stated a claim for wrongful termination” in violation of public

policy. Rivera v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 331 F.3d 1074, 1079 (9th Cir. 2003)

(citing Gould v. Md. Sound Indus., Inc., 31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 718, 725 (Ct. App.1995)).

Next, assuming without deciding that there was an implied contract not to

terminate except for good cause, because Home Depot terminated Hatto after it

conducted an investigation, allowed Hatto a chance to respond, weighed the

credibility of the people interviewed, and concluded that Hatto had violated the

workplace policy against threatening a coworker with physical violence, Hatto

raises no genuine issue of material fact as to his termination for good cause. See

Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc., 948 P.2d 412, 422 (Cal. 1998).

2
Finally, Hatto’s claim of defamation fails as a matter of law because the

statements he alleges to be defamatory were privileged, see King v. United Parcel

Serv., Inc., 60 Cal. Rptr. 3d 359, 372 (Ct. App. 2007), and privileged statements

are not subject to defamation claims, see Smith v. Maldonado, 85 Cal. Rptr. 2d

397, 402 (Ct. App. 1999). Hatto’s compelled self-defamation claim fails because

he has raised no issue of material fact that there was a “strong compulsion” to tell

prospective employers why he had been terminated by Home Depot. See Davis v.

Consol. Freightways, 34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 438, 448 (Ct. App. 1994).

AFFIRMED.

3
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-12-00132- CV Eugeni o F alcon, Antonio Falcon, Elroy Ver a, Juan D. Posada, Jose Vasquez,

Kar ina Mascorr o, and Wi lliam Sm ith, App ellants
v. Bonan za Capital, Ltd. and Bernay Box as Trustee of Bon anza Maste r F und , Ltd. Liq uid ating Trust, App ellees
F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 345 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 2-0 0016 4, H ONO RAB LE RHO NDA HURLEY , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellants have filed an agree d motion reque sting that this appea l be dismiss ed. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1). We grant the motion and dismiss the appea l.

__________________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Justices Puryear , Henson a nd Goodwin Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: September

21, 2012
No. 09-11021.

#### Grace M. Honesto, Petitioner v. California, et al.

562 U.S. 1087, 131 S. Ct. 691,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9336.

178 L. Ed. 2d 520,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 859, 131 S. Ct. 132, 178 L. Ed. 2d 80, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6253.
No. 10-7023.

#### Gypsy Lawson and Fran Ogren, Petitioners v. United States.

562 U.S. 1051, 131 S. Ct. 618,

178 L. Ed. 2d 449,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8931.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 712.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David J. NobleDavid J. NobleChairman/DirectorAnd Principal Executive OfficerMarch 31, 2005Date
# Troop Support disability employment awareness observation focused on access, equity

/ Published Nov. 2, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support observed National Disability Employment Awareness Month with an Acquisition Forum event on Oct. 25, highlighting this year’s theme, “Advancing Access and Equity.”   

The program included presentations by DLA Troop Support employees and partners, detailing the experiences of those with disabilities in the workforce and their contributions to strengthening the national economy. The DLA labor force is built on diversity and implementation of policies to facilitate hiring those with disabilities, said DLA Troop Support Deputy Commander Kishayra Lambert, in her opening remarks.  

“DLA is committed to hiring practices that increase participation of Americans with disabilities, including our wounded warriors,” Lambert said. “DLA has become the gold standard and largest employer for these young men and women in both the Defense Department and federal government. 

DLA plans to maintain its commitment to a diverse workforce, including those with disabilities and promoting access and fair opportunity for all, she said. 

“We look forward to continuing our partnership, working together to find ways to reduce costs and increasing the level of performance even further...in support of our warfighters who so bravely defend this nation,” Lambert added.  

A diverse workforce benefits those looking for work and helps disabled individuals establish independence in the face of adversity. 

“I may not be able to do everything you can do,” said Kari Hammit, a keynote speaker and Transylvania Vocational Services employee with a disability. “I may have to do it differently, but it doesn’t mean that I am less than.”   

Hammitt further explained that being able to work with a disability was “life-changing” in helping her gain independence and live on her own terms. 

“I was able to lift myself out of poverty, I can afford my living expenses, help my aging parents with some of their expenses, save for a house, take vacations, and support a local charity,” she said.  

The event was cosponsored by the Troop Support Equal Employment Opportunity Office, Procurement Process Support and Small Business Office. “The Federal Government has a responsibility to set the standard for fair and decent practices in the workplace,” President Joe Biden stated in his White House NDEAM proclamation.

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act, which prioritizes hiring individuals with disabilities and protecting them with federal laws that promote citizens’ rights regardless of their disability.
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kenneth J. Eaken, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: May 19, 2005          /S/Kenneth J. Eaken
                            Principal Executive Officer
                            Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.