alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Airmen recognized for leadership, excellence by DLA enterprise            

/ Published March 25, 2022
Richmond, Va., 
Two Defense Logistics Agency Aviation airmen win enterprise-level recognition for their performance and leadership.

Air Force Master Sgt. Jordan DeJesus won DLA’s 2022 Outstanding Airman of the Year award and will go on to compete at the Air Force level.

DeJesus was recognized as the first Air Force logistics career broadener to work with one of the activity’s original equipment manufacturers and helped build the broadening program’s support structure with industry. In this role, he assisted in delivering logistics support for more than 700 aircraft sustained by a $35 billion dollar procurement contract.

He also led a team of give volunteers that provided over 2,000 meals for the community and replenished 47 pantries in 13 conties in the Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas metro area in support of COVID-19 relief efforts. 

Air Force Lt. Col Sean Bojanowski is DLA’s and the Air Force’s District of Washington winner and nominee for the General Thomas P. Gerrity Award for 2021. He will go on to compete against other airmen within the Air Force’s major commands and the winner will be announced at the Air Force Association’s national convention in September 2022 at National Harbor, Maryland.

Bojanowski is the deputy chief of the Air Force Customer Facing Division, Customer Operations, DLA Aviation in Richmond, Virginia.

Bojanowski was recognized for leading a team of 87 military and civilian members responsible for supporting 27 weapons systems valued at $1.88 billion in sales. He helped synchronized support across 41 weapons systems driving backorders down by 23% and increasing aircraft readiness by 7.7%.

He integrated DLA capability with the Air Force major commands, sustainment centers and program management offices to increase aircraft availability, coordinating logistics support with three industrial support activities as well as combatant commanders, U.S. allies, and other federal government agencies.

During the nomination period, he also graduated from the Air War College through distance learning and attended University of Tennessee courses in resident to gain knowledge in global supply and demand chain management. Within the community, he served as a Boy Scout Den leader, helping the troop raise $2,000 through fundraising activities.

 “This not an individual award but a division award,” said Bojanowski. “I’m thankful for the men and women in our division and am humbled to work with the three branches and our Air Force weapon system program managers. Our team members give their hearts and souls every day and are very proud to be supporting the warfighter across the enterprise.”
#### People v Delaney

4th Dept: 138 AD3d 1420 (Monroe)

denied 8/12/16 (Pigott, J.)
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

         Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer each certify as
follows:

         (a) This Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

         (b) The information contained in this Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

                             /s/ Lawrence N. Smith
                             ---------------------
                             Chief Executive Officer
                             Date: August 12, 2002


                             /s/ Eleanor J. Whitehurst
                             -------------------------
                             Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
                             Date: August 12, 2002

                                      -20-
#### Daisy Trinidad, Respondent, v Rafael Lantigua, M.D., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[767 NYS2d 618]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about July 10, 2003, which, upon the grant of plaintiff’s motion for renewal, inter alia, denied defendants’ previously granted motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint to add a cause of action for wrongful death, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The issue of whether plaintiff should have been granted renewal to submit a certified death certificate in support of her proposed cause of action for wrongful death has been waived by defendants’ failure to appeal from the prior order denying plaintiff leave to amend “without prejudice” to a subsequent motion for the same relief supported by a certified death certificate *(see Moleon v Kreisler Borg Florman Gen. Constr. Co.,*304 AD2d 337 [2003]).

Under the particular circumstances presented, the affidavit of plaintiff’s expert, which plaintiff’s prior counsel inexplicably failed to submit, was properly considered by the court on renewal *(see Mejia v Nanni,*307 AD2d 870 [2003]). The affidavit was sufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether defendant doctor’s treatment of the decedent comported with prevailing standards of professional medical care *(see Lambos v Weintraub,*246 AD2d 356 [1998]).

*164Dismissal of the action as time-barred insofar as it alleges malpractice prior to July 16, 1998 was properly denied. Particularly in view of defendant Lantigua’s failure to keep treatment notes of the decedent’s numerous visits to his office in the 1990s, there are outstanding factual issues as to whether Lantigua continuously treated the decedent for symptoms of the cancer he allegedly failed to timely diagnose at a time prior to July 16, 1998 *(see Hill v Manhattan W. Med. Group-H.I.P.,*242 AD2d 255 [1997]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Ellerin, JJ.
# C_2014421EN.01005202.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/52

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2014 — de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission

(Case F-107/13) (1)

1

((Staff case - Officials - Retired official - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary measure - Pension deduction - Examination of the incriminating witness by the Disciplinary Board - Failure to hear from the official concerned - Failure to respect the right to be heard))

2014/C 421/73

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: José Antonio de Brito Sequeira Carvalho (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: É. Boigelot and R. Murru, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Subject-matter of proceedings

Subject-matter of proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision of the Commission to impose a disciplinary measure on the applicant under Article 9(2) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations and requests for damages for the non-pecuniary harm allegedly suffered and reimbursement of amounts already deducted.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1) | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 14 March 2013 imposing on Mr de Brito Sequeira Carvalho, for disciplinary reasons, a deduction of one third of his net monthly pension amount for a period of two years. |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 14 March 2013 imposing on Mr de Brito Sequeira Carvalho, for disciplinary reasons, a deduction of one third of his net monthly pension amount for a period of two years.

| 2) | Dismisses the remainder of the action. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Dismisses the remainder of the action.

| 3) | Order the European Commission is to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by M. de Brito Sequeira Carvalho. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Order the European Commission is to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by M. de Brito Sequeira Carvalho.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 C 24, p. 41.

1

---
#### Josef Kreimer et al., Appellants, v Rockefeller Group, Inc., et al., Defendants, and RCP Associates, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 333]—

*408In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated March 13, 2002, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Rockefeller Group, Inc., RCP Associates, Rockefeller Center, Inc., and Rockefeller Center Management which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant RCP Associates.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated against the defendant RCP Associates.

The plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages after the plaintiff Josef Kreimer slipped and fell on a curb-cut sidewalk incline. The plaintiffs alleged that the sidewalk incline was negligently installed and maintained by, among others, the abutting property owner, the defendant RCP Associates.

The Supreme Court erred in granting summary judgment to RCP Associates. RCP Associates did not meet its burden of establishing that it did nothing to create the alleged defective sidewalk condition *(see Breger v City of New York,*297 AD2d 770, 771 [2002]; *Mendoza v City of New York,*205 AD2d 741, 742 [1994]; *Botfeld v City of New York,*162 AD2d 652, 653 [1990]). The only proof offered by RCP Associates was the unsubstantiated and conclusory affidavit of its principal, Kenneth Perko, who stated that RCP Associates was an out-of-possession landlord that did not have control over the abutting premises or the accident site. Without producing the written lease or other acceptable documentation indicating this lack of control, RCP Associates failed, prima facie, to demonstrate its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Larkin v Radio City Music Hall Corp.,*282 AD2d 405 [2001]; *Vasquez v RVA Garage,*238 AD2d 407, 408 [1997]; *Buckley v Rockefeller Group,*143 AD2d 623 [1988]).

In any event, the plaintiffs raised triable issues of fact by submitting (1) RCP Associates’ “Distinctive Street Improvement Maintenance Declaration,” and (2) Perko’s affidavit from a prior bankruptcy proceeding. These evidentiary items raised *409material questions of fact regarding RCP Associates’ role in creating the alleged defect and Perko’s credibility *(see Williams v O &Y Concord 60 Broad St. Co.,*304 AD2d 570, 571 [2003]; *Wilk v Cohen,*254 AD2d 57 [1998]; *Botfeld v City of New York, supra*at 653-654).

In light of the foregoing, the plaintiffs’ remaining contentions need not be reached. Santucci, J.P., Adams, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 36036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17338]

[[Page 36036]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service

Surety Companies Acceptance on Federal Bonds: Name Change--
Allegheny Mutual Casualty Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 18 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570; 1997 Revision, published July 1, 1997, at 62 FR 35548.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 875-6905.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Allegheny Mutual Casualty Company, a 
Pennsylvania corporation, has formally changed its name to Allegheny 
Casualty Company, effective January 1, 1998. The Company was listed as 
an acceptable surety on Federal bonds at 62 FR 35549, July 1, 1997.
    A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal 
bonds, dated today, is hereby issued under sections 9304 to 9308 of 
Title 31 of the United States Code, to Allegheny Casualty Company, 
Meadville, Pennsylvania. This new Certificate replaces the Certificate 
of Authority issued to the Company under its former name. The 
underwriting limitation of $1,023,000 established for the Company as of 
July 1, 1997, remains unchanged until June 30, 1998.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30, each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the Company remains qualified (31 CFR, part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1, 
in the Department Circular 570, which outlines details as to 
underwriting limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety 
business and other information. Federal bond-approving officers should 
annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 1997 
Revision, at page 35549 to reflect this change.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet 
(http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/index.htm1) or through our computerized 
public bulletin board system (FMS Inside Line) at (202) 874-6887. A 
hard copy may be purchased from the Government Printing Office (GPO), 
Subscription Service, Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When 
ordering the circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 048000-
00509-8.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Funds 
Management Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6A11, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 98-17338 Filed 6-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-55-M
```
No. 09-10840.

#### Vincent Warren, Petitioner v. David Napoli, Superintendent, Southport Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 853, 131 S. Ct. 114,

178 L. Ed. 2d 70,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6007.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
#### Elijah Baker, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

144 So. 877.

Division B.

Opinion filed December 17, 1932.

*Hendricks & Hendricks,*for Plaintiff in Error; '

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in Error was indicted and tried for murder in the first degree and was convicted of murder in the second degree. He was sentenced to twenty years in the State penitentiary and seeks relief from that judgment on writ of error.

Many errors are assigned, all being predicated on the admission of evidence, the giving or refusal of charges, improper comment of the Court and Counsel in the presence of the jury and the sufficiency of the evidence, as a whole, to support the verdict.

We have examined the record in the light of these assignments and while the testimony is in hopeless conflict, there is ample predicate fou the verdict and reversible error is not otherwise shown.

The judgment of the trial Court is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

*430Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
USITC Interactive Tariff and Trade DataWeb

Version 3.1.0

Login Screen

Direct access to trade data; customized reports; instant answers. Data on extended special tariff programs now available.

Complex queries created under "advanced searching" can be saved for future runs. For all users - U.S. imports and exports by

your list of products or one at a time. Example: enter Quick Query, select all commodities, Chile, 6-digit aggregation, sort by

value, and get the top 10 values, all other, and total-instantly. Sign-in below.

The Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) expired on December 31, 2010. Importers are still entering imports

with an A, A*, or A+ in the import documents in order to facilitate possible refund of duties paid in the event that the

GSP program is reinstated retroactively. In addition, imports from AGOA countries can still enter duty-free under the

Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) program, but for those products for which a D is not shown in the special

rates column of the HTS, an A or A* will be used, which may show up in the data as a GSP entry even though it was

actually entered under the authority of AGOA.

Enter username and password

User Name

Password

LOG-IN

There is no charge for registration and use.

Completion of a brief user registration form is

required. This will allow us to analyze usage and

costs by user sectors and save your product and

country lists for your personal use at another

login.

CREATE NEW ACCOUNT

FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

Notice concerning DataWeb user registration and passwords: New users will see the "Create New User Account Form".

3/14/2011 United States International Trade Com...

dataweb.usitc.gov/scripts/user_set.asp 1/2
Estimated time to complete the form is two minutes or less. The information in the form is subject to requirements of section 3507,

title 44, of the United States Code (the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, as amended). This information is gathered pursuant to

19 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Disclosure of the information is voluntary, but failure to provide the information may result in denial

of access to the DataWeb. Review DataWeb fine print.

3/14/2011 United States International Trade Com...

dataweb.usitc.gov/scripts/user_set.asp 2/2
*September*7, 2017

2017-Ohio-7476.]

2015-0060.

#### Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Provenza.

On report by the Board of Professional Conduct. In 2017-1158, *In re Resignation of Provenza,*this court accepted respondent’s resignation with disciplinary action pending. Therefore, this cause is dismissed. Costs are taxed to respondent.
# C_2015046EN.01004701.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2014 — Selo Medical v OHIM — biosyn Arzneimittel (SELOGYN)

(Case T-173/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SELOGYN - Earlier national word mark SELESYN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Refusal to register))

(2015/C 046/58)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Selo Medical GmbH (Unternberg, Austria) (represented by: T. Schneider, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: biosyn Arzneimittel GmbH (Fellbach, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunz-Hallstein and H. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 January 2013 (Case R 2601/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between biosyn Arzneimittel GmbH and Selo Medical GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Selo Medical GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Selo Medical GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.

1

---
No. 10-6688.

#### William Walls, Petitioner v. Brian B. Dosch.

562 U.S. 1069, 131 S. Ct. 658,

178 L. Ed. 2d 492,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9276.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1




                           EAGLE-PICHER HOLDINGS, INC.

              SUBSIDIARIES OF EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. ("EPI")



Cincinnati Industrial Machinery Sales Company [Ohio]
Daisy Parts, Inc. [Michigan]
Eagle-Picher Acceptance Corporation [Ohio]
Eagle-Picher Development Company, Inc. [Delaware]
         EPMR Corporation [Michigan]
Eagle-Picher Far East, Inc. [Delaware]
Eagle-Picher, Inc. [Virgin Islands]
Eagle-Picher Industries of Canada Limited [Canada]
Eagle-Picher Industries Europe B.V. [Netherlands]
         Eagle-Picher Automotive GmbH [Germany]
         Eagle-Picher UK Limited [England and Wales]
              Eagle-Picher Hillsdale Limited [England and Wales]
         Eagle-Picher Wolverine GmbH [Germany]
              Eagle-Picher Technologies GmbH [Germany]
Eagle-Picher Minerals, Inc. [Nevada]
         Eagle-Picher Minerals International S.A.R.L. [France]
              Eagle-Picher Minerals Europe GmbH & Co. KG [Germany]
              Eagle-Picher Minerals Europe Verwaltungs- und Beteiligungs
                 GmbH [Germany]
Eagle-Picher Technologies, LLC [Delaware]
         Eagle-Picher Energy Products Corp. [Canada]
EPTEC, S.A. de C.V. [Mexico]
Equipos de Acuna, S.A. de C.V. [Mexico]
Hillsdale Tool & Manufacturing Co. [Michigan]
         Carpenter Enterprises Limited [Michigan]



[ ] Brackets indicate state or country of incorporation and do not form part of
    corporate name.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of
Bruce C. Dale                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       of                            Duckwall-ALCO
Stores, Inc.

I,
Bruce C. Dale, President and Chief Executive Officer of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.,
hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (a) |  | The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 30,                   2005, which
accompanies this certification, fully complies                   with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the                   Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (b) |  | The
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K                   for the year
ended January 30, 2005, which accompanies this                   certification, fairly
presents, in all material respects, the                   financial condition and results
of operations of Duckwall-ALCO                   Stores, Inc.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By: | /s/ Bruce
      C. Dale
      Bruce C. Dale 
      President and Chief Executive Officer
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  April 29, 2005

---