alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           19,206,626
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     500,896
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 23,177,259
<CASH>                                         4,713,255
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             14,849,326
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         (377,162)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 76,610,618
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                20,493,433
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            20,181,482
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          1,168,597
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                4,125,436
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       198,610
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,166,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   76,610,618
<PREMIUMS>                                     11,297,599
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            916,570
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (267,829)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 1,769,080
<BENEFITS>                                     11,205,456
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    2,557,948
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           7,910,952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,958,936)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,045,253)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,913,683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,913,683)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.66)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 12,299,879
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            5,199,550
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              5,199,784
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             3,792,444
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               9,292,799
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                10,399,334
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        2,192,704



</TABLE>
#### Rourke v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.

12/16/2015

575 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 116 A.3d 87
Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a  14(a)/15d  14(a) Certification

of the Chief Executive Officer

I, James R. Bazet, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-K of Cobra Electronics Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2007 |  | /s/    JAMES R. BAZET        
|                     |  | James R. Bazet               
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Com. v. Glowania

05/03/2016

13 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 657
No. 10-7324.

#### Delfino Reyes-Miranda, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1095, 131 S. Ct. 806,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9529.

178 L. Ed. 2d 539,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 389 Fed. Appx. 981.
<PAGE>
21.1 SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Covansys (Mauritius) Limited                                     Mauritius
CBSI Financial Services Corporation                              Michigan
CBSI Europe, N.V.                                                Belgium
Covansys Luxembourg BRR Management S.A.                          Luxembourg
Covansys (India) Limited                                         India
BPR Management S.A.                                              Belgium
CBSI Belgium S.A.                                                Belgium
BPR Belgium                                                      Belgium
Covansys Canada, Inc.                                            Canada
Complete Business Solutions Australia Pty Limited                Australia
E-Business Solutions.com, Inc.                                   Delaware
Covansys (Singapore) Pte Ltd                                     Singapore
Covansys S.A.                                                    Switzerland
Covansys Germany GmbH                                            Germany
Covansys Netherlands B.V.                                        Netherlands
Covansys UK Limited                                              UK
Covansys S.r.L.                                                  Italy
Covansys S.L.                                                    Spain
PDA Software Services, Inc.                                      Delaware
OZ Acquisition Corporation                                       Michigan
Claremont Retirement Technologies, Inc.                          Ohio
Gunford Limited                                                  Ireland
No. 09-1532.

#### Charles Clayton, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1043, 131 S. Ct. 595,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8894.

178 L. Ed. 2d 433,

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.

Same case below, 68 M.J. 419.
No. 10-6924.

#### Anthony Benjamin, Petitioner v. Mrs. Booker, et al.

562 U.S. 1105, 131 S. Ct. 828,

178 L. Ed. 2d 552,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9662.

December 13, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# C_2014315EN.01007204.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/72

---

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2014 — Pell Amar Cosmetics v OHIM — Alva Management (Pell amar dr. Ionescu — Calinesti)

(Case T-621/13) (1)

1

2014/C 315/120

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.

1

---
**Exhibit 12.1**
**Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends**                       **Years ended November 30** **(Dollars in thousands)** **2000**  **2001**  **2002**  **2003**  **2004** Income (Loss) from continuingoperations before taxes $23,458  $(29,836) $(28,576) $11,467  $(65,311)                Fixed Charges:                         Interest  35,294   32,386   34,227   34,036   36,706      Preferred stock dividendsaccrued  —   —   —   4,169   16,674      Interest factor portion ofrentals  1,440   1,710   1,920   1,650   2,100                    36,734   34,096   36,147   39,855   55,480                 Earnings (loss) before income taxes andfixed charges $60,192  $4,260  $7,571  $51,322  $(9,831)Preferred stock accretion and accrued dividends $11,848  $13,282  $14,887  $12,274  $— Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stockaccretion and accrued dividends  1.24x   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A Earnings inadequate to cover fixedcharges and preferred stockaccretion and accrueddividends  N/A  $43,118  $43,463  $807  $65,311
COURT OFCWMIWftl APPEALS APR3O201! * t * _^_ Ab@IAcosta,Cterk 

### Mo-hc&: &J£_ £e_fo&ut £o&& 4JLe~ te>e &ai<£ ^ie^tf<i^-^V'/e^_ J kftye.—^efi-i^LedL t^°^'K£J^ ^-JsgA wic^ app&tU

## A d&pO) ©£ 4&g- jUofrtC^^toft*? Ji<2=S loee/vJ MmL&Jl_ pa \et-Z

### £XppegJ(laA>i yroA^-fr i&c^l 4Ae_ "TfcA-AS &>&*.+ o£ -jUo.i*L.t)eC—0--£, MomJO£e£> ffleso+iex)&JL M) objCJ^z. /o file USIU+ JA^_^_^_i*w.eJU* USA.AWeJL^

&MWLg Lee. ~5acV-'s>o<o * l$&2Z6<p Lopez. *>.T<vr£ ^aCI 

### £^lA)bur^--,Jlejyt3 n&SH 2-

P& AoP 4_
### Fw: suggested edits Ken Hustvedt to: Janet Eck 09/14/2010 07:13 PM

Cc: Ann Johnson, Dave Guinnup, Dave Salman, Elaine Manning, Fred Talcott, George Woodall, Jan Tierney, Mark Morris, Mary Kissell, Paula Hirtz, Phil Mulrine, Randy Mcdonald, Rick Vetter, Sarah Mazur, Stan Durkee, Steve Shedd, Ted Palma, Tim Benner, Wendy Blake, Peter Tsirigotis

we are ready for signature ----- Forwarded by Ken Hustvedt/RTP/USEPA/US on 09/14/2010 07:12 PM -----

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney

_ Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: Ken Hustvedt/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Nathaniel Jutras/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 09/14/2010 07:10 PM Subject: FW: suggested edits

Hi KC,

Can you have Nate upload this into ROCIS? This will be the version that we conclude review on.

Regards, Cortney

-----Original Message----- From: Hustvedt.Ken@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Hustvedt.Ken@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 7:09 PM To: Higgins, Cortney Subject: Re: suggested edits

(See attached file: RTR Bins12 OMB ProPkg14Sep10Ver2.doc)

|------------> | From: | |------------>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------| |"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------| |Ken Hustvedt/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: ||------------>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------| |09/14/2010 06:05 PM |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------>

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------| |suggested edits |

>----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------|

Hi KC, Here are some suggested edits – there may be additional suggested edits.

[attachment "pfos excerpt_edits.docx" deleted by Ken Hustvedt/RTP/USEPA/US]

RTR Bins12 OMB ProPkg14Sep10Ver2.doc
#### In the Matter of David L.S., III. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Caprice L.T., Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 813]

Appeal by the mother from an amended order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Kings County (Alan Beckoff, J.), dated July 7, 2016. The amended order, after a fact-finding hearing, found that the mother neglected the subject child.

Ordered that the amended order of fact-finding is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, alleging that the mother neglected the subject child. After a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court found that the mother neglected the child. The mother appeals.

The mother’s contention that the Family Court erred in admitting into evidence a recording of a telephone conversation between her and the paternal grandmother is unpreserved for appellate review *(see Matter of Angel P. [Evelyn C.—Keith G.],*137 AD3d 793, 796 [2016]) and, in any event, without merit *(see People v*McPhillips, 133 AD3d 785, 786 [2015]; *People v Nealy,*32 AD3d 400, 402 [2006]). The court erred, however, in admitting testimony by the paternal grandmother regarding a conversation with the maternal aunt and a recording of a telephone conversation between the paternal grandmother and the maternal grandmother under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule *(see People v Cantave,*21 NY3d 374, 382 [2013]; *People v Vasquez,*88 NY2d 561, 576 [1996]; *People v Parchment,*92 AD3d 699, 699 [2012]). Nevertheless, these errors were harmless *(see Matter of Angel P. [Evelyn*C.—*Keith G.],*137 AD3d at 795; *Matter of Jeremiah J.W. [Tionna W.],*134 AD3d 848, 849 [2015]).

The Family Court’s determination that the mother neglected the child was supported by a preponderance of the evidence, which demonstrated that the child’s physical, mental, or emotional condition was in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a result of the mother’s mental illness *(see Matter of Zoey A. [Felicia A.],*139 AD3d 528 [2016]; *Matter of Mesiah Elijah B. [Taneez B.],*132 AD3d 456 [2015]; *Matter of Negus T. [Fayme B.],*123 AD3d 836 [2014]; *see also Matter of Kiemiyah M. [Cassiah M.],*137 AD3d 1279, 1279-1280 [2016]).

*634Accordingly, the Family Court properly found that the mother neglected the child.

Rivera, J.R, Hall, Miller and Duffy, JJ., concur.
Served: April 8, 2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

AEROVIAS DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. 

under 49 U.S.C. §§ 41308 and 41309 for approval of 

and antitrust immunity for alliance agreements

Docket DOT-OST-2015-0070

NOTICE SUSPENDING THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE

On March 31, 2015, Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) and Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

(“Aeromexico”), collectively the “Joint Applicants,” filed a joint application requesting approval 

of and antitrust immunity for alliance agreements covering routes between the United States and 

Mexico. 

When an application for antitrust immunity is submitted, the Department’s procedural rules 

require us to promptly determine whether the application is complete (see 14 CFR § 303.40). 

We have determined that the application submitted by Delta and Aeromexico is not yet 

substantially complete. The Joint Applicants have not submitted supporting documents and the 

Department does not have sufficient information on the record to evaluate whether the 

application meets established standards and policies.

There is an additional, threshold matter in this case. The Department’s policy has been to 

consider requests for antitrust immunity only when all of the elements of an open-skies 

agreement are available to carriers (see Order 92-8-13; Order 2008-4-17 at 2). The liberalized air 

transport agreement between the United States and Mexico, initialed in Washington, D.C., on 

November 21, 2014, does not contain all of the elements of an open-skies agreement. However, 

the initialed agreement provides a framework to introduce those elements in the future. 

For both of these reasons, we are here suspending the procedural schedule. We will announce a 

procedural schedule, including an opportunity for public comment, at a later date.

We will serve this notice on all persons on the service list for this docket. 
2

By: 

SUSAN L. KURLAND

Assistant Secretary 

for Aviation and International Affairs 

Date: April 8, 2015

(SEAL) 

An electronic version of this document is available at http://www.regulations.gov
No. 10-7070.

#### Anthony C. Littrell, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1053, 131 S. Ct. 621,

178 L. Ed. 2d 451,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8988,

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34211-34212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration 
(DOT/FAA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 
et seq.) this notice announces that the information collection request 
described below has been forwarded to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for review. The FAA is requesting an emergency clearance 
by July 14, 1998, in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.13. The following 
information describes the nature of the information collection and its 
expected burden.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: .
    Title: Inflight Medical Incident Report.
    Need: The Aviation Medical Assistance Act of 1998 directs the 
Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to reevaluate the 
equipment in medical kits and emergency training requirements for 
flight attendants, and to determine whether automatic external 
defibrillators should be required equipment on air carriers and 
possibly at airports. To make this determination,

[[Page 34212]]

the Act directs, in part, that a major air carrier shall make a good 
faith effort to obtain, and submit quarterly reports to the Federal 
Aviation Administration on in-flight medical emergencies that result in 
death or the threat of death.
    Respondents: Approximately 30 air carriers.
    Frequency: On occasion over the course of one year.
    Burden: 274 hours.
    For Further Information: or to obtain a copy of the request for 
clearance submitted to OMB, you may contact Ms. Judi Citrenbaum at the: 
Federal Aviation Administration, Aeromedical Standards Branch, AAM-210, 
800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591.
    Comments may be submitted to the agency at the address above.

    Issued in Washington, DC on June 17, 1998.
Patricia W. Carter,
Acting Manager, Corporate Information Division, ABC-100.
[FR Doc. 98-16633 Filed 6-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     37,838,000
<SECURITIES>                               87,471,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,477,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (753,000)
<INVENTORY>                                   203,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,052,000
<PP&E>                                      6,291,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,009,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            171,072,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,303,000
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      132,000
<OTHER-SE>                                163,181,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              171,072,000
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            3,596,000
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               2,848,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            5,784,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,357,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  165,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,522,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,522,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>