alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 3, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00392

- CV

Sherry CAGLE n/k/a Sherry Schwartz,

Appellant

v.

Mario CUELLAR , Norma Cuellar, James Donald Cagle, and Hannah Funding LLC., Appellees

From th e 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 01910

Honorable Laura Salinas , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s reply brief is currently due June 7, 2021. On June 3, 2021, appellant filed an unopposed motion requesting an extension of time to file her reply brief until June 21, 2021. After consideration, appellant’s motion is GRANTED . We ORDER appellant to file her reply brief by June 21, 2021

.

_____________ ____________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of June, 2021

.

_________________ __________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of Jade Yun Hon, Respondent, v Tin Yat Chin, Appellant.

[48 NYS3d 718]-\

Appeal by Tin Yat Chin from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Dennis Lebwohl, J.), dated July 15, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied his motion to vacate an order of protection of that court dated February 21, 2014, which, after an inquest, and upon a finding that he committed family offenses within the meaning of Family Court Act § 812, directed him, inter alia, to stay away from the petitioner until February 20, 2016. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and we have also reviewed the appellant’s pro se supplemental brief. Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]).

Rivera, J.R, Balkin, Chambers and Cohen, *JJ.,*concur.
No. 10-6712.

#### Curtis Leon Taylor, Petitioner v. George M. Hinkle, Warden.

562 U.S. 1070, 131 S. Ct. 660,

178 L. Ed. 2d 493,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9215,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 387.
No. 10-7250.

#### Hector Guillermo Balleza, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1076, 131 S. Ct. 680,

178 L. Ed. 2d 505,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9432.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 613 F.3d 432.
2017-0913.

#### Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. Dept. of Edn.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-863, 2017-Ohio-5607. On appellants’ emergency motions for injunction pending appeal. Motions denied.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

W. Scott Gwin, J., of the Fifth District Court of Appeals, sitting for French, J.
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of R.H.
Donnelley Inc. as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid
C. Swanson
Chief Executive Officer and Director
March 15, 2006
    
    Steven M. Blondy
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
March 15, 2006
No. 10-6612.

#### Clarence G. Bryant, Petitioner v. John Fayram, Warden.

562 U.S. 1068, 131 S. Ct. 653,

178 L. Ed. 2d 490,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9427.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 10-6583.

#### Francisco Javier Medina, Petitioner v. Larry E. Scribner, Warden.

562 U.S. 1068, 131 S. Ct. 651,

178 L. Ed. 2d 489,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9408,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5775.

#### Brian Dennis Douglas, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 937, 131 S. Ct. 344,

178 L. Ed. 2d 223,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7599.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 247.
No. 10-5849.

#### In re Pablo Pina, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 352,

178 L. Ed. 2d 257,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7676.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 10-6590.

#### Danny Ray Meeks, Petitioner v. Tennessee Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1068, 131 S. Ct. 687,

178 L. Ed. 2d 489,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9174,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 10-285.

#### CNG Financial Corporation, Petitioner v. Allen L. Davis.

562 U.S. 1004, 131 S. Ct. 515,

178 L. Ed. 2d 372,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8621.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County, denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**Certification of John T. KilcoyneI, John T. Kilcoyne, certify that:1. I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Micrus Endovascular Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statement were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(a) and 15d-15(c), forthe registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.          June 15, 2006       By: /s/ John T. Kilcoyne         John T. Kilcoyne    President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-7026.

#### In re William Ray Johnson, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1028, 131 S. Ct. 587,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8792.

178 L. Ed. 2d 429,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 09-10965.

#### Janetta Lynn Leiva, Petitioner v. Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

562 U.S. 857, 131 S. Ct. 125,

178 L. Ed. 2d 76,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6279.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 972.
# C_2013129EN.01002101.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/21

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 11 March 2013 — Elan v Commission

(Case T-27/13 R)

(Interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery from the beneficiary - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency)

2013/C 129/42

Language of the case: Slovene

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Elan, proizvodnja športnih izdelkov, d.o.o. (Begunje na Gorenjskem, Slovenia) (represented by: P. Pensa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Kocjan, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Commission Decision C(2012) 6345 final of 19 September 2012 on the measures taken in favour of the group Elan d.o.o. (SA.26379 (C 13/2010) (ex NN 17/2010))

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William R. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.

|               |  |        |                                                  
|-------------- |  | ------ | -------------------------------------------------
|              
|April 28, 2003 |  | By:    | /s/ WILLIAM R. WALKER                            
|               |  |        |                                                  
|               |  | Name:  | William R. Walker                                
|               |  | Title: | Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial
Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60198

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CRAIG EDWARD TANNER,

a/k/a Gerald Bongiorno,

a/k/a Jerry Neil Tanner,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:94-CR-123

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Craig Edward Tanner appeals his sentence resulting from his

guilty plea to an indictment for conspiracy to import marijuana. 

Tanner asserts that he was not factually connected to all of the

marijuana shipments for which he was held accountable at

sentencing. At the sentencing hearing, the Government presented
No. 96-60198

- 2 -

the testimony of a special agent with the U.S. Customs Service

who tied Tanner to the marijuana shipments in question using four

separate criteria - the return address, the method of packaging,

Tanner’s areas of operation, and Tanner’s previous arrest

locations.

The district court was not clearly erroneous in the amount

of marijuana it considered relevant to the determination of

Tanner’s offense conduct. United States v. Vital, 68 F.3d 114,

117 (5th Cir. 1995).

AFFIRMED.
## Launch/Recovery

The DJI Inspire 1 is a vertical take-off and land UAS. This allows the platform to take off from virtually any flat surface. For our purposes, the UAS will be placed on a flat open area free of congestion and at least 100 feet of clearance. The UAS operator will perform a pre-flight checklist before each flight.

When flying in class “D” airspace, PIC will contact local tower (MCASNR)Marine Corps Air Station New River, and coordinate with local air traffic. PIC will give location and altitudes of intended flight operations and contact tower after operations have ended.

While the actual launch and recovery will take place at the same location the day of the flight, the launch and recovery location will vary and will be determined that day depending on the mission.



### Pre-Flight Checklist

Power on Inspire 1 Ensure link to Controller Transform to landing mode Power off Inspire 1 Attach and lock Camera and Gimbal Insert Camera Card and format Power on Inspire 1 Ensure Link to Controller Firmware up to date Battery Charged Calibrate Compass if needed Inspire placed in safe launch area Propellers Tight and Locks applied Area clear of people and other hazards.



## Take-Off Warn bystanders of take off Safe to Fly on Pilot App Confirmed Initiate launch sequence Hover for 20 seconds Inspect Inspire 1 for defects Confirm all movement directions Confirm battery level Monitor signal strength Keep line of sight



## Recover Warn bystanders of incoming Inspire 1 Check to see if landing area is clear of obstructions and hazards Bring Inspire 1 to hover at approximately 5 foot Manually lower landing gear Land Inspire 1 after clearing area and assuring landing gear is fully lowered Allow rotors to come to complete stop


## Post-FlightLanding zone clear and safe Stop recording Power down Inspire 1 Remove Rotors Remove Camera and Gimbal Power on Inspire 1 Transform to travel mode Power off Inspire 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmerInst Insurance Group, Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stuart Grayston, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/S/ STUART GRAYSTON                    
|Stuart Grayston                        
|President (Principal Executive Officer)
|August 14, 2009
No. 10-402.

#### Tuck-It-Away, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. New York State Urban Development Corporation, dba Empire State Development Corporation.

562 U.S. 1108, 131 S. Ct. 822,

178 L. Ed. 2d 556,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9750.

December 13, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.

Same case below, 15 N.Y.3d 235, 907 N.Y.S.2d 122, 933 N.E.2d 721.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q REPORT OF  REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC.  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C.
SS.SS. 1350(a) AND (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), the
undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation.

Date:
November 5, 2010

/s/ STEVEN J. JANUSEK Steven J. Janusek, Chief Financial Officer


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350(a) and (b)), is not
a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his knowledge.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation and will be retained by
Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc. and Reddy Ice Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

Pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Raymond N. Joeckel, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Eagle Exploration Company, (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 29, 2007



/s/ Raymond N. JoeckelName: Raymond N. JoeckelTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-6294.

#### Carrie J. Hale McCoin, Petitioner v. Marvin Fickle.

562 U.S. 1013, 131 S. Ct. 529,

178 L. Ed. 2d 389,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8611.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 629.
No. 10-7276.

#### Alfredo Cisneros-Gutierrez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1077, 131 S. Ct. 681,

178 L. Ed. 2d 506,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9114.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 598 F.3d 997.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2744 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2744

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Administrator of the United States Agency for 
International Development to prescribe the manner in which programs of 
      the agency are identified overseas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``USAID Branding Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR BRANDING.

    (a) In General.--The Administrator of the United States Agency for 
International Development (USAID) is authorized to prescribe, as 
appropriate, the use of logos or other insignia of the USAID Identity, 
or the use of additional or substitute markings including the United 
States flag, to appropriately identify, including as required by 
section 641 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2401), 
overseas programs administered by the Agency.
    (b) Audit.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Inspector General of the United States Agency for 
International Development shall submit to Congress an audit of 
compliance with relevant branding and marketing requirements of the 
Agency by implementing partners funded by the USAID, including any 
requirements prescribed pursuant to the authorization under subsection 
(a).

            Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2744

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize the Administrator of the United States Agency for 
International Development to prescribe the manner in which programs of 
      the agency are identified overseas, and for other purposes.
```