alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 5, 2017

t1212 

# Order

Clerk January 5, 2017

154176

VAN JENKINS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 154176

COA: 331320

Washtenaw CC: 15

- 001068

- PD

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN CREDIT UNION

and RIGHTWAY AUTOMOTIVE CREDIT

COMPANY,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 12, 2016 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 09-11527.

#### Ardeana Ellis, Petitioner v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline.

562 U.S. 1061, 131 S. Ct. 638,

178 L. Ed. 2d 478,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9097.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 481.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Eric Haskell, Chief Financial Officer of SunCom Wireless, Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SunCom Wireless, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III. E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293] for the registrant and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293]; 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors: 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2006
#### People v Eghebamien

1st Dept: 146 AD3d 414 (Bronx)

denied 3/13/17 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
# Employees’ children go to work to learn about Troop Support 

/ Published May 2, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

Hundreds of children from Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support families learned about their family member’s work during this year’s Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work Day April 28.Representatives stationed at exhibition tables throughout Building 6 showed children how DLA Troop Support’s five supply chains support the warfighter.Children were able to try on helmets used by soldiers at the Clothing and Textiles exhibit and pick up a replica of a serpent with snake handling equipment at the Construction and Equipment exhibit. The children also learned about military medals, Meals, Ready-to-Eat, medical kits and military flags.An exhibit from Naval Support Activity Philadelphia and two vehicles from the Pennsylvania Army National Guard were also available for families to interact with.Avril Dickerson, a contract specialist with Industrial Hardware, said that the event was well organized and a good learning experience for the kids.Patricia Cappo-Dean, a clerk with Industrial Hardware, said that it was also a good opportunity for employees to see what the other supply chains do.“Most of the time, you just don’t get to see what everyone else does,” Cappo-Dean said.Jaylene, age 8, said that she enjoyed visiting the medals room and the vehicles from the National Guard.“I liked being able to get in the trucks,” Jaylene said.The annual event was coordinated by the DLA Troop Support Corporate Communications Office.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 257 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 

deduction for State and local taxes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2019 

Mr. KING of New York (for himself and Mr. SUOZZI) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the limitation on deduction for State and local taxes, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SALT Fairness Act 

5 of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR STATE 

7 AND LOCAL, ETC. TAXES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 164(b) is amended by 

9 striking paragraph (6). 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 257 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in section 

3 11042 of Public Law 115–97. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Com. v. Kearns

05/11/2016

980 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 490
The Honorable D. Brook Bartlett, Chief Judge, United States 1

District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

___________

No. 95-2111

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Western District of Missouri.

Michael Kenneth Williams, also *

known as Squirrel, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: March 5, 1996

 Filed: March 8, 1996

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Williams pleaded guilty to one count

of distributing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and

(b)(1)(C), and one count of possessing a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 922(g) and 924(a)(2). The district court sentenced Williams to 137

1

months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release on the methamphetamine

count and to 120 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release on the

firearms count, the sentences to run concurrently. On appeal, Williams's

appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), raising as issues (1) whether law enforcement officials

engaged in sentencing entrapment by delaying revocation of Williams's

probation so he could engage in additional drug buys, and (2) whether

evidence of tape recorded conversations acquired by
-2-

a body recorder worn by an undercover law enforcement official should be

suppressed, because of the government's failure to obtain prior

authorization pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2515 et seq.

We conclude Williams's claim that undercover law enforcement

officials illegally recorded conversations with him is meritless, as

monitoring of a conversation by a person acting under color of law is

permitted when that person consents. See 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(c); United

States v. Jones, 801 F.2d 304, 315 (1986).

 

Williams's sentencing entrapment claim may be more aptly

characterized as a sentencing manipulation claim. Compare United States

v. Barth, 990 F.2d 422, 424 (8th Cir. 1993) (sentencing entrapment) with

United States v. Shephard, 4 F.3d 647, 649 (8th Cir. 1993) (sentencing

manipulation), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1322 (1994). No matter how

characterized, the claim fails. The record indicates that, in this

proceeding, the amount of drugs counted as relevant for sentencing did not

include any drugs purchased after the delay in Williams's probation

revocation. 

We do not consider Williams's ineffective-assistance claim, raised

for the first time on appeal in one of his two supplemental pro se briefs,

as that claim should be raised in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding where the

record can be appropriately developed. See United States v. Kenyon, 7 F.3d

783, 785 (8th Cir. 1993).

In accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have

reviewed the record, and have found no nonfrivolous issues for review.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Section 1350 Certification of**

**the Chief Financial Officer**

I, Robert J. Ben, the interim chief financial officer ofCobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra ElectronicsCorporation and its subsidiaries.
No. 10-272.

#### John Crane Inc., Petitioner v. Thomas F. Atwell, Jr., Executor of the Estate of Thomas F. Atwell, Deceased.

562 U.S. 1000, 131 S. Ct. 552,

178 L. Ed. 2d 367,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8501.

November 1, 2010.

The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0135 Focus Ready Draft 1/13/2011 ENGINEER: Avcin \ EV PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER: USE:
OTHER USES:

.file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM] SAT (concerns) (01/07/2011): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Migration to groundwater: Slow PBT rating: P1B1T1 - Health: 1 Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 18 ppb.) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0135file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM]file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0135file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0135file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM]
EXHIBITS 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                   AS ADDED BY
                 SECTION 9006 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on form 10KSB of Diapulse Corporation of
America (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jesse Ross, President
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

         2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
         Report.


Date:  March 31, 2006   by:/s/ JESSE ROSS
                        ------------------------
                        Jesse Ross
                        President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-11422.

#### Lazaro Cruz, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 879, 131 S. Ct. 195,

178 L. Ed. 2d 118,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7048.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-1170-000]


CLECO Energy, L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

January 20, 1998.
    Take notice that on December 22, 1997, CLECO Energy, L.L.C. (CLECO 
Energy), petitioned the Commission for acceptance of CLECO Energy Rate 
Schedule FERC No. 1; the granting of certain blanket approvals, 
including the authority to sell electricity at market-based rates; and 
the waiver of certain Commission Regulations.
    CLECO Energy intends to engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy purchases and sales as a marketer. CLECO Energy is not in the 
business of generating or transmitting electric power. CLECO Energy is 
an affiliate of Central Louisiana Electric Company, Inc., a public 
utility subject to the Commission's jurisdiction under the Federal 
Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a, et seq.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before February 2, 1998. Protests 
filed with the Commission will be considered by it in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make the 
Protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of CLECO Energy's filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1688 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Devlin's Pointe Apartments v. Rouse 50

07/27/2016

97 WAL (2016)

50

. Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

No. 1988 WDA 2015
**Exhibit      10.2(d)**

**ECHELON      CORPORATION**

**Performance      Share Agreement**

**Grant      #__________**

**[Name]**

**Number      of Performance Shares:**
**[________]**

**Vesting      of Performance Shares**
**[insert      vesting schedule]**

*IMPORTANT:*

**PLEASE      BE SURE TO READ ALL OF APPENDIX A, WHICH CONTAINS THE SPECIFIC TERMS AND      CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT.**

|  **ECHELON              CORPORATION** |   |  **EMPLOYEE**                          |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                       |   |                                        |
|                                       |   |                                        |
|  **[NAME]**                           |   |  **[NAME]**                            |
|                                       |   |                                        |
|                                       |   |                                        |
|  **[TITLE]**                          |   |                                        |
|                                       |   |                                        |
|  Date: ___________, 200__             |   |  Date: ___________,              200__ |

----

**APPENDIX          A**

**TERMS      AND CONDITIONS OF PERFORMANCE SHARES**

** **
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 4.35  


 
 

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST    
    
    OF    
    
    LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS CAPITAL TRUST VIII    
    


        This Certificate of Trust is being duly executed as of November 23, 2004 for the purposes of forming a statutory trust pursuant to the Delaware Statutory
Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et. seq.) (the "Act"). 


        1.     NAME.
The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is "Lehman Brothers Holdings Capital Trust VIII" (the "Trust"). 



        2.     DELAWARE
TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the Delaware resident trustee of the Trust meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the Act are as follows: 



Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, National Association

500 Stanton Christiana Road, 3rd Floor

Newark, Delaware 19713

Attention: Institutional Trust Services 




        3.     EFFECTIVE
DATE. This Certificate of Trust, which may be executed in counterparts, shall be effective immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware. 


[Remainder
of page intentionally left blank] 







 

        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the trustees of the Trust, have duly executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first written above. 



	JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

as Property Trustee	 	 
	

By:	
 	

/s/  DIANE P. LEDGER      
	
 	

 
	Name:	 	Diane P. Ledger	 	 
	Title:	 	Assistant Vice President	 	 
	

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

as Delaware Trustee
	

By:	
 	

/s/  TAI BILL LEE      
	
 	

 
	Name:	 	Tai Bill Lee	 	 
	Title:	 	Vice President	 	 
	

By:	
 	

/s/  JEFFREY A. WELIKSON      
 Jeffrey A. Welikson, as Regular Trustee	
 	

 
	

By:	
 	

/s/  BARRETT S. DIPAOLO      
 Barrett S. DiPaolo, as Regular Trustee	
 	

 
	

By:	
 	

/s/  OLIVER BUDDE      
 Oliver Budde, as Regular Trustee	
 	

 




2











QuickLinks


CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS CAPITAL TRUST VIII
# C_2014142EN.01003401.xml

| 12.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 March 2014 — FTI Touristik v OHIM (BigXtra)

(Case T-81/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark BigXtra - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 142/43

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: FTI Touristik GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by A. Parr, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 November 2012 (case R 2521/2011-1), relating to an application for registration of the word sign BigXtra as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders FTI Touristik GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders FTI Touristik GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.

1

---
DLA Distribution Korea leadership changes hands in new, modernized warehouse facility
 
  By By Matthew Mahoney, DLA Distribution Public Affairs
  The mantle of leadership changed hands at Defense Logistics Agency, Korea June 16 as Army Lt. Col. Corinne McClellan relinquished command to Army Lt. Col. Nathan Hadlock in a ceremony performed in the newest and most modern warehouse in the DLA Distribution network. The ceremony was officiated by Army Col. Brian Donahue, military deputy commander, DLA
Indo-Pacific. Under McClellan’s leadership, the team at DDDK would be crucial to the delivery of COVID-19 vaccines across the region, ensuring the readiness of warfighters across the Korean peninsula. She would lead a blended team of Korean nationals, civilians and U.S. military through a global pandemic and the completion of the most up to date warehousing facility in DLA Distribution. Her constant and focused efforts lead to greatly enhanced relationships with DLA Distribution customers and with the Republic of Korea. In recognition of her efforts and outstanding performance,  McClellan was awarded the Defense Superior Service Medal. The incoming commander, Hadlock, is no stranger to the peninsula. He received his commission as an ordnance officer with branch detail, armor, from Norwich University in 2003. He is a graduate of the Armor Officer Basic and Combined Logistics Captains Career Course, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College and Airborne School. Hadlock’s pervious assignments include Armor Platoon Leader, Headquarters Company XO, Military Advisor; Company Commander 61st Maintenance Company, Camp Stanley; RC-S LNO and BDE Maintenance Officer; Distribution Mobility Chief; Support Operations Officer and Battalion Executive Officer; Secretary of General Staff and Plans Officer; and Airlift Officer of the 5th Battlefield Coordination Detachment at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam. Lt. Col. Hadlock’s awards and decorations include Bronze Star Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Army Achievement Medal, NATO Medal, the Combat Action Badge and Parachutist Badge.
No. 10-7127.

#### Reinaldo Lopez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1074, 131 S. Ct. 673,

178 L. Ed. 2d 501,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9049.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 908.
No. 10-6183.

#### Steven Ray DeLaCruz, Petitioner v. Rich Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1011, 131 S. Ct. 523,

178 L. Ed. 2d 385,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8574.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.