alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Jonathan Coleman, Respondent, v New York City Department of Education Division of Human Resources et al., Appellants.

[61 NYS3d 889]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis, J.), entered June 1, 2016, which granted the petition to annul the determination of respondent Department of Education (DOE), dated February 12, 2015, denying petitioner’s application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner, and remanded the matter for further proceedings, unanimously reversed, on the law, the determination confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 dismissed, without costs.

*538The denial of petitioner’s application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and capricious *(see Matter of Dempsey v New York City Dept. of Educ.,*25 NY3d 291, 300 [2015]; *see also Matter of Arrocha v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.,*93 NY2d 361, 363-364 [1999]). The finding that petitioner’s misdemeanor conviction caused grave concern when considering his moral character, and indicated poor judgment and reckless behavior, is supported by the facts surrounding his 2009 conviction for petit larceny in violation of Penal Law § 155.25. This conviction bears a direct relationship to petitioner’s application for security clearance (Correction Law § 752 [1]), and DOE rationally concluded that petitioner’s employment would pose an unreasonable risk to property or the safety and welfare of specific individuals or the general public (Correction Law § 752 [2]).

The record demonstrates that DOE properly considered the factors enumerated in article 23-A of the Correction Law *(see Matter of Arrocha,*93 NY2d at 364-365; *Matter of Persaud v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs.,*114 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2014]), and the fact that DOE afforded greater weight to factors unfavorable to petitioner than to those favorable to him does not warrant the conclusion that it did not consider the favorable factors *(see Arrocha*at 366-367). Furthermore, while petitioner’s certificate of relief from disabilities creates “a presumption of rehabilitation” (Correction Law § 753 [2]), it does not establish an entitlement to employment (see *Matter of Bonacorsa v Van Lindt,*71 NY2d 605, 614 [1988]).

Petitioner’s separate failures to disclose his prior termination and criminal record, in violation of DOE’s rules and regulations, provide independent and rational bases for denying security clearance (see *e.g. Matter of Sindone v City of New York,*2 AD3d 125, 126 [1st Dept 2003]).

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Webber, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
No. 10-6610.

#### Robert E. Terrell, Jr., Petitioner v. Mary Berghuis, Warden.

562 U.S. 1016, 131 S. Ct. 536,

178 L. Ed. 2d 394,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8428.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2689 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 

United States Postal Service to issue a semipostal to raise funds for 

breast cancer research. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2019 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Ms. CHENEY, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. CONNOLLY, Ms. 

CLARKE of New York, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Ms. NORTON, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. KING of New York, Ms. 

MATSUI, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. 

PETERS, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Ms. WILD, Mr. HIMES, Mrs. DINGELL, Ms. LEE of California, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Ms. MOORE, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. SABLAN, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mrs. 

DAVIS of California, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Mr. HIGGINS

of New York, Mr. RASKIN, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. 

MUCARSEL-POWELL, Mr. BUDD, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Miss GONZA ́LEZCOLO ́N of Puerto Rico, Mr. HUNTER, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Mr. ADERHOLT, 

Mr. HAGEDORN, Mr. COHEN, Ms. GABBARD, Mr. COLLINS of New York, 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. KEVIN

HERN of Oklahoma, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. TURNER, Mr. BOST, Ms. CASTOR

of Florida, Mr. HECK, Mr. MARSHALL, Mrs. AXNE, Mr. MAST, Mr. 

GARAMENDI, Ms. ESCOBAR, and Ms. HAALAND) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, and 

in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to extend the authority of the United States Postal Service to issue a 

semipostal to raise funds for breast cancer research. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2689 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Breast Cancer Re5 search Stamp Reauthorization Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CAN7 CER RESEARCH. 

8 Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘2019’’ and inserting ‘‘2027’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
No. 09-11175.

#### In re Michael Phillips, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 153,

178 L. Ed. 2d 260,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7662.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2017-011]


Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Extension of Time

December 30, 1997.
    At the scoping meeting for the Big Creek No. 4 Project, P-2017, 
held on December 16, 1997, the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) requested an 
extension of time to file written comments regarding Scoping Document 1 
(SD1), issued November 13, 1997, in the above-docketed proceeding. 
Several other parties at the meeting, including the California 
Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), concurred that additional time is 
required to complete their review of SD1 and prepare their written 
comments.
    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that all interested 
parties, including the USFS and the CDFG, are granted an extension of 
time to February 20, 1998, to file comments.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-170 Filed 1-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Circulatory System Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory 
Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Circulatory System Devices Panel of the Medical 
Devices Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on June 29 and 30, 1998, 8 
a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: Corporate Bldg., conference room 020B, 9200 Corporate 
Blvd., Rockville, MD.
    Contact Person: John E. Stuhlmuller, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health (HFZ-450), Food and Drug Administration, 9200 
Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-443-8243, ext. 157, or FDA 
Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in 
the Washington, DC area), code 12625. Please call the Information Line 
for up-to-date information on this meeting.
    Agenda: On June 29, 1998, the committee will discuss, make 
recommendations, and vote on a premarket approval application for an 
external compression device used in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On 
June 30, 1998, the committee will discuss and make recommendations on 
permanent cardiovascular implants such as heart valves and vascular 
grafts.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by June 18, 1998. 
Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between 
approximately 8 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. on June 29 and 30, 1998. Near the 
end of committee deliberations on both days, a 30-minute open public 
session will be conducted to address issues specific to the submission 
or topic before the committee. Time allotted for each presentation may 
be limited. Those desiring to make formal oral presentations should 
notify the contact person before June 18, 1998, and submit a brief 
statement of the general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish 
to present, the names and addresses of proposed participants, and an 
indication of the approximate time requested to make their 
presentation.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 98-15556 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
July 25, 2014

CAAP-11-0000560, CAAP-11-0000843

#### Indymac Venture, LLC v. Khaleghi

Affirmed
No. 10-6481.

#### Gerard D. Grandoit, Petitioner v. The Physician Network, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 999, 131 S. Ct. 532,

178 L. Ed. 2d 366,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8348.

November 1, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   |   |   |                                            |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/  JACK C. BRIDGES                  |
|   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |   |   | **Jack C. Bridges****Executive Vice-President** |

 

|   |   |   |           |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------|
|        |   |   | March 27, 2003 |
|   |   |   |                |
|   |   |   | Date           |
# Fitness promoted through May’s Strong B.A.N.D.S. events

/ Published May 9, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, DSCC MWR will use the Strong B.A.N.D.S. campaign to promote fitness, wellness and resiliency during National Physical Fitness and Sports Month in May.DSCC MWR is offering five events to DSCC Associates, Military and families focused on Balance, Activity, Nutrition, Determination and Strength (B.A.N.D.S.) -- all key components of overall well-being and resiliency."When we talk about well-being and resiliency, really, that's what MWR does.  Strong B.A.N.D.S. is a wonderful opportunity for us to showcase what we have to offer and to get our community actively engaged," said Steve Coulson, MWR Business & Recreation Director.Taking the game of golf to the extreme, the kickoff event on May 12 will be four-hole speed golf at Eagle Eye Golf Course. Players will play four holes as fast as possible with as few strokes as possible. Clubs will be provided for those who need them. On May 18, DSCC’s Child Development Center children and parents will enjoy a short walk while reading “Mud Puddle.” Each child will receive a complimentary copy of the book to take home.The following day, the installation will hold its second annual Memorial Run 5K, honoring our fallen service members and police officers. The first 150 to register and participate will receive a t-shirt.On May 21, MWR will host a free Resiliency Hike at Walnut Woods-Buckeye trail. Hiking has many benefits, including weight-loss, improved cardio health, stress-relief, increased focus and even increased creativity & problem-solving ability.And to close out the month, the fitness center will hold an Aquatics Open House May 31 to celebrate the opening the pool for the summer. The day will include a free water aerobics class and open swim. Go to www.dsccmwr.com/strong for all information about registering for these events, times and locations.
#### Swinton, Matter of, v Schriro

App Div, 2d Dept: 2016 NY Slip Op 81111(U)

denied*
# C_2014071EN.01000302.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 19 November 2013 — F.E. Familienprivatstiftung Eisenstadt

(Case C-589/13)

(2014/C 71/05)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: F.E. Familienprivatstiftung Eisenstadt

Defendant authority: Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Wien

Question referred

Is Article 56 EC (now Article 63 TFEU) to be interpreted as precluding a system for the taxation of the investment income and earnings from the disposal of holdings of an Austrian private foundation in the case where that system provides for a tax charge to be imposed on the foundation in the form of an ‘interim tax’ in order to ensure once-only national taxation only in the case where, on the basis of a double taxation convention, the recipient of donations from the private foundation is granted relief from the tax on capital gains which in principle is chargeable on donations?

---
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2424

To expand the boundaries of the Stones River National Battlefield in

Tennessee, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 25 (legislative day, AUGUST 18), 1994

Mr. SASSER (for himself and Mr. MATHEWS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To expand the boundaries of the Stones River National

Battlefield in Tennessee, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF BATTLEFIELD.

4 The first sentence of section 1(a) of the Act entitled

5 ‘‘An Act to amend the boundaries of Stones River Na6 tional Battlefield, Tennessee, and for other purposes’’, ap7 proved December 23, 1987 (16 U.S.C. 426n(a)) is amend8 ed by striking out ‘‘numbered 327/80,004B, and dated

9 November 1991’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘numbered

10 327/80,011, and dated May 1994’’.
2

•S 2424 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

3 as may be necessary to carry out the amendment made

4 by this Act.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antoine Todd, Appellant.

[65 NYS3d 688]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered January 23, 2015, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of nine years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding for a youthful offender determination, and otherwise affirmed.

As the People concede, based on *People v Middlebrooks*(25 NY3d 516 [2015]) and *People v Rudolph*(21 NY3d 497 [2013]), defendant is entitled to an explicit youthful offender determi*543nation.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
#  HQC employees celebrate Disability Employment Awareness Month with performance, fair

/ Published Oct. 26, 2015
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, National Disability Employment Awareness Month
#### Frankie L., Matter of (Talia G.)

2d Dept: 141 AD3d 657 (Proceeding No. 1)

denied*
# C_2015236EN.01003601.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2015 — AgriCapital v OHIM — agri.capital (AGRI.CAPITAL)

(Case T-514/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark AGRI.CAPITAL - Earlier Community word marks AgriCapital and AGRICAPITAL - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 236/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AgriCapital Corp. (New York, United States) (represented by: P. Meyer and M. Gramsch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: agri.capital GmbH (Münster, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann-Schiffel, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 July 2013 (Case R 2236/2012-2), relating to opposition proceedings between AgriCapital Corp. and agri.capital GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders AgriCapital Corp. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders AgriCapital Corp. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.

1

---
VI 

103D CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2421 

For the relief of Rose-Marie Barbeau-Quinn. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 25 (legislative day, AUGUST 18), 1994 

Mr. HATFIELD (for himself and Mr. PACKWOOD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Rose-Marie Barbeau-Quinn. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Rose-Marie Barbeau-Quinn shall be held 

7 and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 

8 United States for permanent residence as of the date of 

9 the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required 

10 visa fee. 


rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2421 IS 

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Rose3 Marie Barbeau-Quinn as provided in this Act, the Sec4 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce 

5 by one number during the current fiscal year the total 

6 number of immigrant visas available to natives of the 

7 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

8 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)). 

Æ 


rmajette on DSK89S0YB1PROD with BILLS
No. 10-6659.

#### Michael Bracey, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 539,

178 L. Ed. 2d 396,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8341.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 580.
No. 10-181.

#### James D. Schneller, Petitioner v. Philadelphia Entertainment and Development Partners, L.P.

562 U.S. 962, 131 S. Ct. 468,

178 L. Ed. 2d 289,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8013.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, denied.

Same case below, 605 Pa. 255, 988 A.2d 1288.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:



|By: | /s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Financial Officer | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | 

Date:
December 6, 2002

---

QuickLinks
# C_2015228EN.01002503.xml

| 13.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/25

---

Order of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission

(Case T-8/13) (1)

1

(2015/C 228/32)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.1




STATEMENT
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Thomas
Granville, Principal Executive Officer of Axion Power International, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:





The
Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Thomas GranvilleThomas
      Granville, Principal Executive OfficerDated:
      March 30, 2010
No. 10-6949.

#### Monelle Terrod Harris, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1050, 131 S. Ct. 614,

178 L. Ed. 2d 446,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8878.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 386 Fed. Appx. 449.