alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           CLARK/BARDES HOLDINGS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        THREE MONTH ENDED               NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                           SEPTEMBER 30                    SEPTEMBER 30
                                     -------------------------      ---------------------------
                                         1998          1997            1998            1997
                                     -----------   -----------      -----------     -----------

<S>                                   <C>           <C>             <C>              <C>
Numerator:
  Net income (loss) ............      $ 2,382,313   $   888,713     $(2,628,317)     $  351,541
Effect of dilutive
  securities:
  Interest on convertible
     debt (net of tax) .........           39,945        24,414               *          24,414
                                      -----------   -----------     -----------      ----------
Numerator for diluted
  earnings per share ...........      $ 2,422,258   $   913,127     $(2,628,317)     $  375,955
Denominator:
  Denominator for basic
     earnings per share --
     weighted-average
     shares ....................        5,407,503     4,347,718       3,958,602       4,478,052
  Effect of dilutive
     securities:
     Stock options .............          221,052          --                 *            9837
     Convertible debt ..........          528,371       265,291               *          89,402
                                      -----------   -----------     -----------      ----------
  Denominator for diluted
     earnings per share --
     adjusted
     weighted-average shares
     and assumed
     conversions ...............        6,156,926     4,613,009        3,958,602      4,577,291
                                      ===========   ===========      ===========     ==========

     Basic earnings (loss)
       per share ...............      $      0.44   $      0.20      $     (0.66)    $     0.08
                                      ===========   ===========      ===========     ==========
     Diluted earnings (loss)
       per share ...............      $      0.39   $      0.20      $     (0.66)    $     0.08
                                      ===========   ===========      ===========     ==========
</TABLE>

----------

*    The effects of options and convertible debt have not been included as such
     effects would be antidilutive.
No. 10-515.

#### Sarah Hatam Peterson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1045, 131 S. Ct. 617,

178 L. Ed. 2d 437,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8815.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 607 F.3d 975.
#### People v Hernandezgonza

1st Dept: 145 AD3d 572 (NY)

denied 3/2/17 (Fahey, J.)
# Cherry Point’s Corrales recognized at annual DLA award ceremony

/ Published Dec. 17, 2015
FT. BELVOIR, Virginia, 
Navy Lt. Jill Corrales, retail manager at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Cherry Point, N.C., was awarded the DLA Company Grade Officer of the Year award at the 48th annual employee recognition ceremony Dec. 10, for working closely with the Fleet Readiness Center-East, 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing and other units onboard Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point to support the warfighter and ensure combat readiness.

DLA director Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch, along with Distribution’s commander Army Brig. Gen. Richard Dix were on hand to present the award.

“Lt. Corrales’ performance has been indispensable in audit readiness, the Disposition to Distribution merger, and the consolidation of several retail stores to increase efficiency and overall effectiveness,” said Kevin Taylor, the Cherry Point’s director.  “The retail metrics show evidence of outstanding logistics support to both local and worldwide customers.”

As the retail manager, Corrales oversees more than $120 million worth of material.  Her team consolidated five retail stores within the last year, improving customer service and accuracy through identifying material and integrating items into a single location.

Corrales also serves as the audit readiness officer, where she worked closely with the retail team to implement Job Breakdown Sheets, which proved vital to a successful cross-training program.

“Lt. Corrales’ commitment to her team, customers, and DLA Distribution is unmatched,” said Taylor.  “Her positive attitude, honesty, and excellent communication skills inspire others and generate enthusiasm in the workplace and build excellent relationships with our customers.”
No. 10-7138.

#### Dink Clark, Petitioner v. Juan Castillo, Warden.

562 U.S. 1074, 131 S. Ct. 673,

178 L. Ed. 2d 501,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9240.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, (the
Report), of Triton PCS, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, David D. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Triton PCS, Inc. and will be retained by Triton PCS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Triton PCS, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
William R. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.

|Date: April 29, 2005 |  | By: /s/ William R. Walker
Name:  William R. WalkerTitle:  Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 10-51 (R46-002).

#### Miami Police Department Chief John Timoney, in His Individual Capacity, et al., Petitioners v. Jeffrey Keating, et al.

562 U.S. 978, 131 S. Ct. 501,

178 L. Ed. 2d 318,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8324.

October 15, 2010.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 598 F.3d 753.
# C_2016048EN.01009001.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/90

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case F-55/13) (1)

1

((Civil Service - EIB staff - Appraisal - 2011 staff report - Unlawfulness of the decision of the Adjudication Panel - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 048/100)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, laywer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Nuvoli and F. Martin, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the appraisal of the applicant’s performance for 2011.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Adjudication Panel of the European Investment Bank of 18 December 2012; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Adjudication Panel of the European Investment Bank of 18 December 2012;

| 2. | Declares that there is no need to rule on the pleas seeking the annulment of the staff report for 2011 and all the connected, consequent and prior acts; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that there is no need to rule on the pleas seeking the annulment of the staff report for 2011 and all the connected, consequent and prior acts;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 4. | Orders the European Investment Bank to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Mr De Nicola. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Investment Bank to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Mr De Nicola.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013, p. 26.

1

---
# C_2014039EN.01001402.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Versailles (France) lodged on 6 December 2013 — Works Council of Nortel Networks SA and Others v Me Rogeau, Liquidator of Nortel Networks SA, Alan Robert Bloom and Others

(Case C-649/13)

2014/C 39/23

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de commerce de Versailles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Works Council of Nortel Networks SA and Others

Applicants:

Defendants: Me Rogeau, Liquidator of Nortel Networks SA, Alan Robert Bloom and Others

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Do the courts of the State in which secondary proceedings have been opened have exclusive jurisdiction over or concurrent jurisdiction with the courts of the State in which the main proceedings have been opened, to rule on the determination of the debtor’s assets falling with the scope of the effects of the secondary proceedings in accordance with Articles 2(g), 3(2) and 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings (1) and, in the event that there is exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction, is the applicable law that of the main proceedings or of the secondary proceedings?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 160, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35565-35566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17303]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD


Meeting

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) has scheduled its regular business meetings to take 
place in Washington, D.C. on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, July 13-
15, 1998 at the times and location noted below.

DATES: The schedule of events is as follows:

Monday, July 13, 1998

9:00 a.m.-Noon and 1:30-4:00 p.m.  Committee of the Whole--
Accessibility Guidelines (Closed Meeting).

Tuesday, July 14, 1998

9:30 a.m.-Noon  Committee of the Whole--Accessibility Guidelines 
(Closed Meeting).
1:30-4:00 p.m.  Committee of the Whole--Detectable Warnings and over-
the-Road Buses, Final Rules (Closed Meeting).

Wednesday, July 15, 1998

9:00 a.m.-10:30 a.m.  Planning and Budget Committee
10:30 a.m.-Noon  Technical Programs Committee
1:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m.  Board Meeting

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at: Marriott at Metro Center, 775 
12th Street, NW., Washington, D.C.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the 
meetings, please contact Lawrence W. Roffee, Executive Director, (202) 
272-5434, ext. 14 (voice) and (202) 272-5449 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the Board meeting, the Access Board will 
consider the following agenda items. Specific voting items are noted 
next to each committee report.

Open Meeting

    <bullet> Executive Director's Report.
    <bullet> Approval of the Minutes of the May 13, 1998 Board Meeting.
    <bullet> Planning and Budget Committee Report--Fiscal Year 1998 
Spending Plan Revision.
    <bullet> Technical Programs Committee Report--Status Report on 
Fiscal Year 1997 and 1998 Research Projects, and Discussion of Research 
Objectives and Direction.

Closed Meeting

    <bullet> Committee of the Whole Reports--Accessibility Guidelines; 
Suspension of Requirements for Detectable Warnings, Final Rule; and 
Accessibility Requirements for Over-the-Road Buses, Final Rule.
    All meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. Sign 
language

[[Page 35566]]

interpreters and an assistive listening system are available at all 
meetings.
Lawrence W. Roffee,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-17303 Filed 6-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
No. 92-8445.

#### McIntosh et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 10.13

                          MOVIE STAR, INC. ("COMPANY")
                     NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN
              ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON DECEMBER 6, 2004


EFFECTIVE DATE.  The effective date of the plan is January 1, 2005.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS. This plan applies solely to the non-employee directors
of the Company. All references to "Director" herein refer solely to the
non-employee directors.

ANNUAL STIPEND FOR DIRECTOR SERVICE. Each Director will receive an annual
stipend of $20,000, payable quarterly in arrears.

COMPENSATION FOR BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS. Compensation for all board and
committee meetings as set forth below will be payable quarterly in arrears.

o    COMPENSATION FOR BOARD OR COMMITTEE MEETINGS ATTENDED IN PERSON. Each
     Director will receive $2,000 per day for board or committee meetings
     attended in person, regardless of the number of meetings held that day.

o    COMPENSATION FOR BOARD OR COMMITTEE MEETINGS ATTENDED TELEPHONICALLY. Each
     Director will receive $1,000 per meeting for board or committee meetings
     attended telephonically, unless two or more teleconference call meetings
     are held back-to-back on the same call, in which case each Director will
     receive $1,000 for the entire call.

ELECTION TO BE PAID IN CASH OR STOCK. Payment of the annual stipend and meeting
fees will be made, at the election of each Director, in cash and/or shares of
the Company's common stock under the Company's 2000 Performance Equity Plan in
such proportion as is determined by each Director. The election for each
calendar year must be made in writing by January 10th of such calendar year. If
a director elects to be paid in stock, either in full or in part, the number of
shares of common stock to be issued will be determined by dividing the dollar
amount of the stipend and meeting fees earned during the quarter (or a
percentage thereof, if the Director elects to receive stock payment in part) by
the last sale price of the Company's common stock on the last trading day of
each calendar quarter in which the fees were earned.

TRAVEL AND RELATED EXPENSES. The Company will pay or reimburse each Director for
all transportation, hotel and other expenses reasonably incurred by the Director
in connection with attendance at board and committee meetings against itemized
reports and receipts submitted with respect to any such expenses and approved in
accordance with the Company's customary procedures.

STOCK OPTION GRANTS. On December 6, 2004, each Director will receive a one-time
grant of immediately exercisable, ten-year, non-qualified options to purchase
12,000 shares of the Company's common stock under the Company's 2000 Performance
Equity Plan, at an exercise price equal to the last sale price of the Company's
common stock on the date of grant.
#### Mirza DeLeon, Appellant, v Michael Bluth, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 409]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated October 9, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing that he neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the alleged condition which caused the plaintiff to slip and fall, and thus established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Papazian v New York City Tr. Auth.,*293 AD2d 658 [2002]; *772
      *Sanchez v Delgado Travel Agency,*279 AD2d 623 [2001]; *Mercer v City of New York,*223 AD2d 688 [1996], *affd*88 NY2d 955 [1996]; *Bradish v Tank Tech Corp.,*216 AD2d 505 [1995]). The burden then shifted to the plaintiff to come forward with evidence sufficient to show the existence of a triable issue of fact *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]). In opposition to the defendant’s motion, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a question of fact as to whether the defendant either created the alleged condition while performing construction work, or had actual or constructive notice thereof *(see Papazian v New York City Tr. Auth., supra; Sanchez v Delgado Travel Agency, supra; Mercer v City of New York, supra; Bradish v Tank Tech Corp., supra).*Prudenti, P.J., S. Miller, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 6932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02559]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Institute of Museum and Library Services

Sunshine Act Meeting; National Museum and Library Services Board

AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), NFAH.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Museum and Library Services Board, which advises 
the Director of the Institute of Museum and Library Services in 
awarding national awards and medals, will meet by teleconference on 
February 20, 2014, to review nominations for the 2014 National Medal 
for Museum and Library Service.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, February 20, 2014, at 1 p.m. EST.

PLACE: The meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the 
Institute of Museum and Library Services. 1800 M Street NW., 9th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4676.

STATUS: Closed. The meeting will be closed pursuant to subsections 
(c)(4) and (c)(9) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code 
because the Board will consider information that may disclose: Trade 
secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person 
and privileged or confidential; and information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Maas, Program Specialist, 
Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street NW., 9th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4798.

    Dated: January 30, 2014.
Nancy E. Weiss,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-02559 Filed 2-3-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
```
No. D-2522.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Herbert Aldon Callihan, Jr.

562 U.S. 811, 131 S. Ct. 402,

178 L. Ed. 2d 267,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7526.

October 4, 2010.

Herbert Aldon Calli-han, Jr., of Bethesda, Maryland, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Maldonado, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 343]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered April 25, 2002, convicting him of escape in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of escape in the second degree is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally suf*650ficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.
SCWC-20-0000153

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII,

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

JOHN KEONI JARDINE, also known as JOHN KEONI JARDINE III

and JOHN JARDINE III,

Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-20-0000153; CR. NO. 1CPC-19-0001233)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant’s Application for Writ

of Certiorari, filed on September 15, 2021, is hereby accepted 

and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be 

notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, September 28, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-20-0000153

28-SEP-2021

02:12 PM

Dkt. 5 OGAC
No. D-2499.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Richard H. Kress.

562 U.S. 808, 131 S. Ct. 397,

178 L. Ed. 2d 263,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7494.

October 4, 2010.

Richard H. Kress, of Clark, New Jersey, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.