alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013344EN.01004802.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/48

---

Action brought on 12 September 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-493/13)

2013/C 344/84

Language of the case: Estonian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun, L. Nicolae and L. Naaber-Kivisoo, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Estonia

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to ensure, in the case of the Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium, effective structural separation of the regulatory function from activities associated with ownership or control of undertakings providing electronic communications networks and/or services, the Republic of Estonia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(2) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to ensure, in the case of the Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium, effective structural separation of the regulatory function from activities associated with ownership or control of undertakings providing electronic communications networks and/or services, the Republic of Estonia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3(2) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services; (1)

1

| — | order the Republic of Estonia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Estonia to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission considers that the Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium (Ministry of the Economy and Communications) is included in the scope of the concept of ‘national regulatory authority’ defined in Article 2(g) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) and the provisions of Article 3 of the Framework Directive apply to it, especially in connection with the structural separation referred to in Article 3(2).

The Commission submits that in addition to regulatory tasks the Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium of the Republic of Estonia also carries out activity associated with the ownership or control of undertakings providing electronic communications networks and/or services. Effective structural separation of the two functions is not ensured, which is contrary to the requirements of Article 3(2) of the Framework Directive.

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33.

1

---
No. D-2566.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Arthur L. Schwartz.

562 U.S. 817, 131 S. Ct. 410,

178 L. Ed. 2d 274,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7576.

October 4, 2010.

Arthur L. Schwartz, of W. Orange, New Jersey, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 10A362.

#### Respect Maine PAC, et al., Applicants v. Walter F. McKee, in his official capacity as a member of the Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, et al.

562 U.S. 996, 131 S. Ct. 445,

178 L. Ed. 2d 346,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8326.

October 22, 2010.

Application for an injunction, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Applicants are correct to note that relief was granted in McComish v. Bennett, 560 U.S. 961, 130 S. Ct. 3408, 177 L. Ed. 2d 320 (2010), which concerned a constitutional challenge to an Arizona law similar to the Maine law challenged by applicants here. The McComish applicants, however, requested a stay of an appeals court decision, whereas applicants here are asking for an injunction against enforcement of a presumptively constitutional state legislative act. Such a request “demands a significantly higher justification” than a request for a stay, because unlike a stay, an injunction “does not simply suspend judicial alteration of the status quo but grants judicial intervention that has been withheld by lower courts.” Ohio Citizens for Responsible Energy, Inc. v. NRC, 479 U.S. 1312, 1313, 107 S. Ct. 682, 93 L. Ed. 2d 692 (1986) (Scalia, J., in chambers). In light of these considerations, and given the difficulties in fashioning relief so close to the election, applicants’ request for extraordinary relief is denied.

Justice Scalia and Justice Alito would grant the application for an injunction as to the matching fund provisions.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-310-005]


Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

June 5, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 2, 1998, Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC 
(GBGP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, Third Revised Sheet No. 136 proposed to be effective June 
30, 1998.
    GBGP states the purpose of the filing is to implement the GISB 
standards for EDI and EDM requirements.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15531 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 09-10562.

#### Archie Roy Jackson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 950, 131 S. Ct. 90,

178 L. Ed. 2d 247,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7716.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 596 F.3d 236.
### UNITED STATES 

### ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

### REGIONS 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http://www.epa.gov/region08 

### AUG - 1 2012 Ref: 8P-AR CERTIFIED MAIL

- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED & ELECTRONIC MAIL Eric L. Dady Vice- President & General Counsel QEP Resources, Inc. 1050 1

## t h Street, Suite 500 Denver, Co 80265 RE: Actual Notice for Approval and Promulgation of Federal Implementation Plan for Oil andNatural Gas Production Facilities DearMr. Dady, This is to notify you that the EPAhas issued a temporary interim final rule promulgating a reservationspecific Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) inorderto regulate emissions from oil and natural gas production facilities located on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (FBIR). The FIP includes basic air quality regulations for the protection ofcommunities in and adjacent to the FBIR. The FIP requires owners and operators ofoil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions ofvolatile organic compounds emanating from well completions, recompletions, and production and storage operations. The agency proposed a reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule. The rule is effective with this actual notice to QEP Resources, Inc. for purposes ofenforcement beginning at 5 p.m. (eastern daylight time) onAugust 3, 2012. We will accept comments onthe proposedrule for 45 days from the date ofpublication in the Federal Register. The EPAAdministrator, LisaJackson, signedthe interim final rule onAugust 1,2012, and the agency is submitting itfor publication inthe Federal Register (FR).A copy ofthe signed interim final rule is enclosed with this letter. The version ofthe enclosed rule serves as the official version for purposes ofcompliance until the interim final rule is published inthe FR. Please referto the published version in a forthcoming FRpublication, which will appear on the Government Printing Office's FDsys website (http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action) and on Regulations.gov (http://www.regulations.gov) inDocketNo. EPA-R08-0AR-2012-0479. Ifyou have any questions on the interim final rule, please contact Deirdre Rothery at (303) 312-6431. Sincerely,

# ~£!o Air Program Enclosures



### 2
#### Com. v. Santiago 40

03/08/2016

796 MAL (2015)

40

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 63
No. 10-5566.

#### Kosoul Chanthakoummane, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 1006, 131 S. Ct. 506,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8543.

178 L. Ed. 2d 376,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Sweetgrass, MT Compressed Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Sweetgrass, MT Compressed Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      | 1      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 25, 2019

No. 04-19-00025-CR

Guillermo CAPETILLO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CRB000381 D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

brief is due on or before December 10, 2019.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE03558

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3508-3509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1652]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 943

[SPATS No. TX-039-FOR]


Texas Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Plan

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), 
Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 3509]]

SUMMARY: OSM is correcting a proposed rule that appeared in the Federal 
Register of December 29, 1997 (62 FR 67592). This document announced 
receipt of a proposed amendment to the Texas abandoned mine land 
reclamation plan (hereinafter referred to as the ``Texas program'') 
under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1997 (SMCRA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael C. Wolfrom, Director, Tulsa Field Office, Telephone: (918) 581-
6430.
    In Federal Register document 97-33662 beginning on page 67592 in 
the issue of Monday, December 29, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1. On page 67593 in the first column under the heading SUMMARY, 
``acquire'' in line 24 should be ``acquired.''
    2. On page 67593 in the first column under the heading ADDRESSES, 
``Texas'' in line five of the third paragraph should be ``Oklahoma.''
    3. On page 67593 in the second column under number 1.a. in line 
two, ``Sec. 12,805'' should be ``Sec. 12.805.''
    4. On page 67594 in the first column, in line three, the ``p'' in 
``paragraph'' should be capitalized.
    5. On page 67594 in the first column, in line 17, the ``i'' in 
``it'' should be capitalized.
    6. On page 67594 in the third column under number 17 in line 5 of 
the paragraph, the ``c'' in ``commission'' should be capitalized.
    7. On page 67595 in the first column in the heading of number 22, 
``Section 21.820'' should be ``Section 12.820.''
    8. On page 67595 in the first column in the paragraph under the 
heading ``Public Hearing,'' the word ``INFORMAITON'' in line three 
should be ``INFORMATION.''

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 904

    Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.

    Dated: January 15, 1998.
Charles E. Sandberg,
Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. 98-1652 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
No. 10-6686.

#### Roger B. Hargrave, Petitioner v. The Washington Post.

562 U.S. 1018, 131 S. Ct. 541,

178 L. Ed. 2d 397,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8431.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 365 Fed. Appx. 224.
# Tellis is awarded the Defense Meritorious Service

/ Published June 13, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Commander Charles M. Tellis, Supply Corps, United States Navy, was awarded the Defense Meritorious Service medal during a ceremony at DLA Distribution Bahrain June 13.“It’s truly an honor to preside over today’s ceremony as we bid farewell to Charles and celebrate the many accomplishments under his leadership,” said Army Col. Hattie Richardson, commander DLA CENTCOM and SOCOM. “He has had a distinguished career with multiple tours.”

Tellis commanded the distribution center from May 2017 until June 2019.

Tellis is a graduate of the University of West Florida and received his commission in 1999 though Officer Candidate School in Pensacola, Florida.  He has a master’s degree in Management from Troy University, a master’s degree in National Security and Strategic Studies and is a graduate of the Maritime Advanced Warfighting School at Naval War College Newport, Rhode Island.

Next Tellis will attend the Eisenhower School of National Security in Washington D.C.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6781
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MELVIN ANTONIO BURL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:99-cr-00176-RGD-1) Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Antonio Burl, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Melvin Antonio Burl appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burl , No. 2:99-cr-00176-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 2, 2008, entered Apr. 3, 2008). We deny Burl’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2354 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2354

  To designate the United States courthouse under construction in St. 
      Louis, Missouri, as the ``Thomas F. Eagleton United States 
                 Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 3 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

  Mr. Danforth (for himself, Mr. Bond, and Mr. Pryor) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse under construction in St. 
      Louis, Missouri, as the ``Thomas F. Eagleton United States 
                 Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THOMAS F. EAGLETON UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 111 South Tenth 
Street in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 
``Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thomas F. 
Eagleton United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2358 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2358

 To amend the Clean Air Act to provide relief for non-self-generating 
           ozone nonattainment areas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 3 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

 Mr. Levin (for himself and Mr. Riegle) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Clean Air Act to provide relief for non-self-generating 
           ozone nonattainment areas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREAS.

    Section 182(h)(1) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7511a(h)(1)) is 
amended by striking ``that does not'' and all that follows through 
``Census)''.

                                 <all>
```
DLA police officer receives award for life saving efforts
 
  By Matthew Mahoney, DLA Distribution Public Affairs
  Defense Logistics Agency Police Officer, Sergeant Matthew Bednego, administered life-saving CPR while responding to an emergency call April 12 at Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania. Arriving on scene as the initial emergency responder, Bednego assessed the patient, an employee in cardiac arrest with no pulse and not breathing, and took over resuscitation efforts from the patient’s coworker until emergency medical personnel arrived. Bednego’s efforts are credited as being critical to the successful revival and stabilization of the patient. “Sergeant Bednego is an asset to the DLA Police Department and the Installation Community,” said DLA Police Chief Douglas Schraeder.
For his swift response and life-saving actions that day, Bednego received the DLA Meritorious Civilian Service Award.
Exhibit 99.1

                                CERTIFICATIONS OF
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Inforetech  Wireless
Technologies,  Inc. (the " Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "
Report"),  I,  Robert  C.  Silzer,  hereby  certifies  in my  capacity  as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

          1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          2. The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



Dated: April 18, 2003             By: /s/ Robert C. Silzer
                                  -------------------------
                                  Name:   Robert C. Silzer
                                  Title:  Chief Executive Officer


     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Inforetech  Wireless
Technologies,  Inc. (the " Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "
Report"),  I,  Robert J.  Sundberg,  hereby  certifies  in my  capacity as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

          1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          2. The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



Dated: April 18, 2003             By: /s/ Robert J. Sundberg
                                  ---------------------------
                                  Name:   Robert J. Sundberg
                                  Title:  Chief Financial Officer