alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 15787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06205]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8663]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Boichot Vases''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Boichot Vases,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement 
with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Frick Collection, 
New York, New York, from on or about April 21, 2014, until on or about 
April 21, 2016, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 13, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-06205 Filed 3-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# C_2013298EN.01000302.xml

| 12.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/3

---

Appeal brought on 19 July 2013 by Franz Wilhelm Langguth Erben GmbH & Co. KG against the judgment delivered on 20 February 2013 in Case T-378/11 Franz Wilhelm Langguth Erben GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-412/13 P)

2013/C 298/04

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Franz Wilhelm Langguth Erben GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: R. Kunze and G Würtenberger, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

The Appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the General Court of 20 February, dismissing an action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 May 2011 (Case R-1598/2010-4) relating to a claim of seniority of earlier marks; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the General Court of 20 February, dismissing an action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 May 2011 (Case R-1598/2010-4) relating to a claim of seniority of earlier marks;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appeal is brought against the judgment of the General Court dismissing the Appellant’s claim for annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 May 2011 relating to a claim of seniority of earlier marks in an application for registration of the figurative sign MEDINET as a Community trade mark.

The General Court infringed Article 34 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark by holding that that provision was to be interpreted narrowly and did not allow the seniority of part of an earlier national mark to be claimed. It further infringed its duty to state reasons under Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009, in that it came to its decision on the basis of incomplete factual and legal considerations. Finally, the decision of the General Court without an oral procedure constituted a breach of Article 77 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT ALFRED PETRILL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 55 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### People v Jones (William)

2d Dept: 138 AD3d 1144 (Richmond)

denied 8/2/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
From: Fisher, Brian

To: "aaron_L_szabo@omb.eop.gov"

Subject: EPA Response to Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: Interstate Transport Rule for

 the 2008 Ozone NAAQS

Date: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 6:21:00 PM

Attachments: Response to Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO12866_13563 EPA CSAPR Update NPR.docx

Responses_to_EITSD_Interagency Comments Under EO12866_13563 EPA CSAPR Update NPR.docx

Hi Aaron,

Please find attached responses to the TSD and remaining preamble comments you sent last week.

Thanks,

Brian Fisher

Policy Analyst

Clean Air Markets Division

(202) 343-9633
#### Com. v. Perez 37

03/17/2016

733 MAL (2015)

37

. Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 106
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,108-01

EX PARTE FRANKIE LEE COX, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR 04185-A IN THE 220TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM COMANCHE COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of engaging in organized criminal activity and sentenced to forty

years’ imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Cox v. State, No. 11-

18-00189-CR(Tex.App.—Eastland,Jun. 18, 2020) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed

this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

On August 17, 2022, the trial court entered an order designating the application and ordering

trial counsel to file an affidavit. The district clerk properly forwarded this application to this Court

under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 73.4(b)(5). However, the application was forwarded

before the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law. We remand this application to
the trial court to complete its evidentiary investigation and make findings of fact and conclusions of

law.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: October 5, 2022

Do not publish
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert C. Silzer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GPS Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is
made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date:  July 26, 2005                 /s/Robert C. Silzer
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Robert C. Silzer
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALISON REYES

- ARMAS; DAYRY GUILLIBELY POLANCO

- ARMAS,

Petitioners,

v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND , Attorney General, Respondent. No. 15

- 71100 Agency Nos. A087

- 998

- 233

A087

- 998

- 234

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 30 , 2021 * *

Before: GRABER, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. Alison Reyes

- Armas (“Reyes

- Armas”) and Dayry Guillibely Polcano

Armas , native s and citizen s of Honduras , petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 5 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 71100

judge’s decision denying their application s for asylum , withholding of removal , and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”)

. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey , 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the
extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s interpretation of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review for substantial evidence the agenc y’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not err in concluding that Reyes

- Armas failed to establish membership in a cognizable social group. See Cordoba v. Barr , 962 F.3d 479, 482 (9th Cir. 20 20 ) (to demonstrate social group membership, the applicant “ must establish that the group is (1) composed of members who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) socially distinct
within the society in question ” ) (quoting Matter of M

- E

- V

- G

- , 26 I. & N. Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014)) ; see also Reyes v. Lynch , 842 F.3d 1125 , 1138 (9th Cir. 2016) ( rejecting the proposed social group of “ former members of Mara 18 gang in El
Salvador who have renounced their gang membership ”)

. Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s conclusion that both petitioners failed to establish that they would be persecuted on account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“ An3 15

- 71100

alien’s desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”)

. Thus,

t he petitioners’ asylum and withholding of removal claim s fail. The p etitioner s do not challenge the agency’s determination that they failed to establish eligibility for CAT protection

. See Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 1259

- 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived)

. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
(March 23, 2017)

#### Eileen Stein, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[50 NYS3d 325]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. Ñervo, J.), entered February 20, 2015, which granted the motion of defendant City of New York for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The City established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff alleges that she was injured when, while crossing the street within the crosswalk, she tripped and fell in a pothole. The City submitted evidence showing that it neither created nor had written notice of the defective condition that caused plaintiff to fall (Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201 [c]; *see e.g. Rosenblum v City of New York,*89 AD3d 439 [1st Dept 2011]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Plaintiff offers only speculation that further discovery may yield evidence that raises a triable issue *(see e.g. First City Natl. Bank & Trust Co. v Heaton,*165 AD2d 710, 712 [1st Dept 1990]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Richter, Moskowitz and Kapnick, JJ.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 1, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23

- 0770

Lower Tribunal No. 18

- 18167

________________



### James E. Turner

, Appellant,

vs.



### Federal National Mortgage Association

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Valerie R.

Manno Schurr , Judge.

James E. Turner

, in proper person

.

McGlinchey Stafford, William L. Grimsley, and Kimberly Held Israel
(Jacksonville) , for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ

, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# C_2013377EN.01001502.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 November 2013 — Efag Trade Mark Company v OHIM (FICKEN LIQUORS)

(Case T-54/13) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for figurative Community trade mark FICKEN LIQUORS - Absolute ground for refusal - Mark contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality - Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 377/35

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Efag Trade Mark Company GmbH & Co. KG (Schemmerhofen, Germany) (represented by: M. Wekwerth, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 November 2012 (Case R 2544/2011-1) concerning an application for registration of the figurative mark FICKEN LIQUORS as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Order Efag Trade Mark Company GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order Efag Trade Mark Company GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 FOR AREMISSOFT CORPORATION
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                          6,537
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   18,385
<ALLOWANCES>                    (639)
<INVENTORY>                     711
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                29,608
<PP&E>                          7,360
<DEPRECIATION>                  (5,505)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  34,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           14,296
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        14
<OTHER-SE>                      12,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    34,536
<SALES>                         50,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                50,132
<CGS>                           12,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   12,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                26,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 9,842
<INCOME-TAX>                    3,247
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             6,595
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    6,595
<EPS-BASIC>                   0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.54


</TABLE>
# C_2014409EN.01004101.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/41

---

Order of the General Court of 23 September 2014 — Jaczewski v Commission

(Case T-178/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Agriculture - Interest in bringing proceedings - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 409/58

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Grzegorz Jaczewski (Bielany, Poland) (represented by: M. Goss, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and A. Szmytkowska, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2012) 5049 final of 24 July 2012 approving the grant of complementary national direct payments in Poland for 2012.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Grzegorz Jaczewski is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Grzegorz Jaczewski is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.

1

---
No. 10-485.

#### Paul Jeffrey Davis, Petitioner v. California Board of Chiropractic Examiners.

562 U.S. 1065, 131 S. Ct. 667,

178 L. Ed. 2d 484,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9277.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.
Exhibit 31.3








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Patrick K. Mullen, certify that:


|   |                                                                                         
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.;

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




/s/ Patrick K. MullenPatrick K. MullenPrincipal Executive Officer


Date: March 22, 2018
E TOPLRATION S

• ^ o. n ' 1 0 Octobe r 12,201 1 Exemptio nNo . 1003 3 Regulatory Docke t

No . FAA-2003-1656 1 U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t Operations , M-3 0 Wes t Buildin g groim dfloo r RoomW12-14 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Sirs/Madams , Wing s Airway s Inc . (certificat e numbe r KJL A259K) , doin g busines s at 2 Marin e Way , Suite 175 , Juneau , Alask a9980 1 i s requestin g renewa l o f existin g Exemptio nNo . 10033 , Regulatory Docke t

No . FA A2003-16561 . Al l Facts , Circumstances , Condition s an dAre ao f Operatio nremai nth e same . Shoul dyo u hav e an y questions , pleas e cal l m e at (907 ) 957-604 1 o r

emai l m e at dan@wingsairways.com .

Danie l C Corso n Directo r o f Operation s Wing s Airway s



### 2 MARIN E WAY , SUIT E 

### 17 5 * JUNEA U 

### * A K* 9980 1 *

* 907-586-627 5 * FA X 907-586-627 6 * WWW.WINGSAiRWAYS.CO M *
906 CERTIFICATION

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

Date: November 19, 2003

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of GiveMePower Corp.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jim
Bolokoski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Jim Bolokoski
                                         Chief Financial Officer