alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Connecticut Regional Haze 

State Implementation Plan November 2009 

ATTACHMENT X 

BART Equivalency Demonstration for Sources in Connecticut

 (including modeling results)
Attachment X 

- CT NWS and MM5 Modeling Results 

- SO2/NOx Actual/Potential Emissions from NOx Budget Program/BART-eligible 

sources 

- Map of SO2 Actual Emissions 

- Map of NOx Actual Emissions
# Corpus Christi workforce practices fire safety with extinguisher training

/ Published Nov. 27, 2015
CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas, 
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 53 employees were killed by workplace fires in 2014.  Although the number of fire-related fatalities has dropped 35 percent from 2013 to 2014, one fatality is too many.

In order to ensure DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas, employees never become one of the statistics, safety specialists David Wilson and Scott Peterson developed a comprehensive fire safety program, which includes hands-on fire extinguisher training. 

With the assistance of Naval Air Station fire inspector Maurice Phillips, the distribution center conducted their annual fire extinguisher training on Nov. 17.  The training was composed of a brief presentation followed by a hands-on activity. “Every successful program should combine classroom and hands-on instructional elements,” explained Wilson. 

The presentation portion of the training covered “must know” subjects such as: sources of fire, classes of fire, types of extinguishers, and, of course, the acronym PASS.  PASS stands for Pull, Aim, Squeeze, and Sweep; an easy way to remember how to properly operate a fire extinguisher. 

Once the presentation was complete, participants were given the opportunity to put what they learned to the test.  The hands-on portion of the training was conducted using the Naval Air Station Fire Department’s fire simulator.  The simulator allows the participant to use the PASS acronym to knock down an incipient stage fire. 

Participant James Purser stated, “The simulator is cool. It really allows you to put what you learned into action.” 

Overall, 77 DLA Distribution Corpus Christi employees completed the annual training, thereby reducing the overall potential for one of them to become a statistic. 

“We are not training [employees] to become firefighters, but we want [them] to feel confident, should they need to operate an extinguisher and know when to evacuate,” said Peterson.
No. 10-6723.

#### Henry C. Linebaugh, Petitioner v. Jeff Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

562 U.S. 1034, 131 S. Ct. 578,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8699.

178 L. Ed. 2d 422,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 751.
No. 10-6779.

#### Todd Randall Finley, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1020, 131 S. Ct. 547,

178 L. Ed. 2d 401,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8344.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 612 F.3d 998.
EXHIBIT
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-88588, 333-39589, 333-112172 and 333-140724) and the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113690, 333-89473, 333-23091, 333-39493,
333-54018, 333-54026, 333-71548, 333-122840, 333-122841, 333-132558, 333-132559,
333-143720, 333-147240, 333-157258, and 333-157262) of LaserCard Corporation and
subsidiaries of our reports dated June 15, 2009, relating to our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and internal
control over financial reporting included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
LaserCard Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31,
2009.




/s/SingerLewak
LLP




San Jose,
California


June 15,
2009
No. D-2496.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Daniel S. Orci, Jr.

562 U.S. 808, 131 S. Ct. 397,

178 L. Ed. 2d 262,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7533.

October 4, 2010.

Daniel S. Orci, Jr., of St. Petersburg Beach, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable *263within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 10-5899.

#### Naomi McCray, Petitioner v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 969, 131 S. Ct. 474,

178 L. Ed. 2d 301,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8008,

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 921.
# C_2014212EN.01002902.xml

| 7.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2014 — Walcher Meßtechnik v OHIM (HIPERDRIVE)

(Case T-95/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark HIPERDRIVE - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 212/36

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Walcher Meßtechnik GmbH (Kirchzarten, Germany) (represented by: S. Walter, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 December 2012 (Case R 1779/2012-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign HIPERDRIVE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Walcher Meßtechnik GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Walcher Meßtechnik GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.

1

---
# Hunter recognized for achievements as first commander of Bahrain distribution center

/ Published June 17, 2015
MANAMA, Bahrain, 
Navy Supply Corps Cmdr. Julie M. Hunter has been awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal for her achievements while serving as commander, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Bahrain, Southwest Asia.
DLA Distribution, Bahrain, Southwest Asia, receives, stores, ships, and issues stock, while providing inventory control, care of stock in storage, packaging, and preservation. Additionally, as a part of this mission, DLA Distribution Bahrain, Southwest Asia provides tailored distribution services through its Material Processing Center. Materiel in storage includes clothing, housekeeping supplies, petroleum products, construction materials, repair parts and component items, and mapping products.

During Hunter’s two year tenure, her capstone accomplishment was standing up DLA Distribution, Bahrain on time and under budget. Her team organized efforts to expand storage space by working with local businesses and locating a 32,000 square foot bulk storage facility. The addition of this facility increased the level of support to the US Navy, by allowing more critical items be stored in this forward location, ultimately increasing readiness for all vessels and commands in the fifth fleet Area of Responsibility.

Hunter actively participated in key strategic planning initiatives that ultimately laid the groundwork for a long-term increased and permanent footprint for all DLA activities in Bahrain at the Mina Salman waterfront area. These efforts will create a "one-stop shop" for all DLA operations directly next to the customers that they support.

Leading a team of civilians, contractors, and third-country nationals, Hunter instilled a culture of responsiveness, collaboration, and DLA professionalism while providing exceptional support to customers throughout the Central Command AOR.

Additionally, she coordinated an effective and focused effort on stewardship initiatives, customer support, and process streamlining that strengthened partnerships. Hunter was able to eliminate the backlog of material receipts, and establish new standards of performance that shaped workforce behavior to achieve performance standards in issues and receipts in the face of increased workload volumes.  

“As the first Commander of the Central Command Area of Responsibility’s newest distribution center, Julie has become the subject matter expert on DLA Distribution operations in Southwest Asia.,” said DLA Distribution commander Army Brig. Gen. Richard Dix.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER








18 U.S.C. 1350 Certification of Richard E. Wilson


President and Chief Executive Officer


of


Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc.





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc., a Kansas corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:





(a)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and;





(b)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and will be retained by Duckwall-ALCO Stores, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  April 15, 2010




By:     /s/    Richard E. Wilson


Richard E. Wilson


President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAIR JUNJUNGAN SIAHAAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72068

Agency No. A095-635-789

ORDER

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner’s motion for judicial notice filed on January 19, 2012, is

DENIED. 

FILED

JUN 07 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50189

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO CARLOS MARRUFO-MORALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-03-CR-1928-ALL-KC

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roberto Carlos Marrufo-Morales appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Marrufo-Morales contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Marrufo-Morales maintains that

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 04-50189

-2-

he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple

reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence

exceeds the maximum terms of imprisonment and supervised release

which may be imposed for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Marrufo-Morales acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
1

 In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-676V

Filed: April 8, 2016

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED

CHARLES STOREY, *

 * Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman

Petitioner, *

 * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;

v. * Reasonable Amount Requested to

 * Which Respondent Does Not Object.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Andrew Donald Downing, Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.

Ryan Daniel Pyles, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

DECISION1

On July 29, 2014, Charles Storey (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

2 Petitioner alleged that his preexisting bilateral tinnitus 

conditioned worsened as a result of the administration of the Influenza (“Flu”) vaccine on 

January 10, 2014. On April 8, 2016, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation.

On April 7, 2015, Petitioner filed an Unopposed Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. 

Petitioner requests compensation in the amount of $40,000.00 for fees and costs incurred by his 

attorney. Petitioner states that Respondent “has no objection to this amount.” In accordance 

with General Order #9, Petitioner’s counsel represents that Petitioner did personally not incur 

any costs in pursuit of his vaccine claim. 

 1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, 

the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal 

Claims, in accordance with the purposes espoused in the E-Government Act of 2002. See 44

U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). Each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any 

information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in 

substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the 

disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 

18(b).

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National 

Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012).
2

The undersigned finds that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a 

reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to 

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b), (e)(1) (2012). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and 

appropriate.

Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards $40,000.00, representing reimbursement for 

attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner 

and Petitioner’s counsel, Andrew D. Downing.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of 

the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of this decision.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman

 Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman

Special Master

 3 Entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek 

review. Vaccine Rule 11(a).
Exhibit 32.2



Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory C. Walker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



/s/    GREGORY C.
WALKERGregory C. Walker Senior Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 9, 2006




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. D-2511.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Pieter J. DeJong.

562 U.S. 810, 131 S. Ct. 400,

178 L. Ed. 2d 265,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7639.

October 4, 2010.

Pieter J. DeJong, of Long Valley, New Jersey, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
# DSCR receives 2016 CINC Award

/ Published July 20, 2016
RICHMOND, Va., 
Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, received the 2015 Commander in Chief’s Annual Award for Installation Excellence in a ceremony July 15, conduct by video telecast to Richmond from the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Pentagon, Arlington, Virginia.

The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Facilities Investment and Management Mike McAndrew and the Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics the Honorable Alan Estevez formally recognized and congratulated Air Force Brig. Gen. Allan Day, DSCR and Defense Logistics Agency Aviation commander, with the installation award in during the VTC.

Day accepted the award saying, it was a great honor to accept on behalf of the employees who made this award possible. 

In the open discussion portion of the ceremony, Day recognized some of the teams that helped DSCR achieve this award. He recognized the buying teams – pre- and post-award as well as the folks in disposition, distribution, mapping, and safety. He also said in the energy savings category that engineers are in process of building the new DLA Aviation operations center and the new Virginia National Guard state headquarters, both of which will use geo-thermal energy.

The Commander in Chief's Annual Award for Installation Excellence recognizes outstanding and innovative efforts of the people who operate and maintain U.S. military installations.  This highly competitive presidential award is given to installations who provide exemplary support to Department of Defense missions.

Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter announced the 2016 winners in May.  DSCR was one of five military bases given the highest award for excellence.

Other installation winners include: U.S. Army Garrison Fort Campbell, Kentucky; Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow, California; and Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Washington.

Each winning installation received a commemorative commander-in-chief's award trophy, flag and a congratulatory letter from the president. The Defense Supply Center Richmond is home to Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, a primary-level field activity of DLA, serving as its aviation demand and supply chain manager.  More than 3,000 employees work on the 600-acre site located in Chesterfield County, Virginia.  The installation is also home to DLA Distribution Richmond and DLA Disposition Services.  DLA Installation Support at Richmond provides facilities and operational support for the installation.
No. 10-6627.

#### James G. Blakely, Petitioner v. David M. Tatarsky, et al.

562 U.S. 1068, 131 S. Ct. 654,

178 L. Ed. 2d 491,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9324.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 343.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




The
      undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)
      hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on
      Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
      certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the
      Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this
      certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of
      that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the
      extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




Date: November 7, 2008/s/ Thomas E. D’AmbraName: Thomas E. D’Ambra, Ph.D.Title: Chairman of the Board, President and
              Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Echelon Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-62045, 333-44198, 333-88880, 333-110679, 333-125395, and 333-149783) of Echelon Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Echelon
Corporation as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP             
|                         
|Mountain View, California
|March 16, 2009
No. 10-7015.

#### Divine Justice Reddick, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1051, 131 S. Ct. 617,

178 L. Ed. 2d 448,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8996.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 288.
# C_2016222EN.01004604.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/46

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 April 2016 — Bandieri v Commission

(Case F-82/13) (1)

(2016/C 222/65)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 325, 9/11/2013, p. 52.

---
No. 10-7076.

#### In re Paul A. DeCologero, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1043, 131 S. Ct. 622,

178 L. Ed. 2d 455,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8904.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.