alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-11371.

#### William A. Brewer, III, Petitioner v. Virginia.

562 U.S. 876, 131 S. Ct. 186,

178 L. Ed. 2d 112,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6663,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
#### People v Fred

3d Dept: 144 AD3d 1399 (Schenectady)

denied 3/2/17 (Rivera, J.)
p.1 

OAR Box 1778 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

255) IV-C-1 

Docket Number: 

A-90-06 

Printed 10/28/2008 9:51:03 AM Sheet 255 of 276 
P.2 

..t o ST<f 

•Sr es> 

\ PflO*lt0 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 

SEP 1 7 1991 

Honorable Ralph Regula 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Ralph: 

. i \> ri i y-

• I 

H'TH U'h-H E ADMINISTRATOR 

«,. V-MThis is in response to your letter of July 31, 1991, 

regarding the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) 

interpretation of the definition of "repowering." 

Section 402(12) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 defines 

repowering as the "replacement of an existing coal-fired boiler" 

with one of several specified clean coal technologies. The 

definition also includes, as qualifying technologies, other 

technologies which are derivatives of "one or more of the 

[specified] technologies, and any other technology capable of 

controlling multiple combustion emissions simultaneously with 

improved boiler or generation efficiency and with significantly 

greater waste reduction relative to the performance of technology 

in widespread commercial use." As you have correctly pointed 

out, this definition, as written, could be interpreted as 

limiting technologies which would be considered repowering 

projects to those that only involve the replacement of the 

boiler. 

As you may know, as part of the rulemaking process, EPA is 

currently taking comments on its proposal to amend regulations 

implementing new source requirements governing modifications at 

electric utility generating units. The proposed rule 

incorporates the statutory definition of repowering without 

change. Your comment is being given careful consideration, and 

EPA will be addressing this issue in the final rulemaking. 

I appreciate this opportunity to be of service and trust 

that this information will be helpful to you. 

Sincerely yours, 

KJAAX. :.;:......;.:v 

William K. Reilly
# C_2013274EN.01003002.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/30

---

Action brought on 4 July 2013 — ZZ v Europol

(Case F-66/13)

2013/C 274/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s fixed-term contract.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision taken by the defendant on 28 September 2012 by which the defendant informed the applicant that her fixed-term contract expiring on 31 December 2012 would not be renewed, as well as the confirmatory decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint, taken on 9 April 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision taken by the defendant on 28 September 2012 by which the defendant informed the applicant that her fixed-term contract expiring on 31 December 2012 would not be renewed, as well as the confirmatory decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint, taken on 9 April 2013;

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicant the difference between (i) the amount of the remuneration to which she would have been entitled had she remained in her post with the defendant and (ii) the amount of the remuneration, fees, unemployment benefits and any other compensation actually received by her since 1 January 2013 by way of replacement for the remuneration she was receiving as a temporary agent; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicant the difference between (i) the amount of the remuneration to which she would have been entitled had she remained in her post with the defendant and (ii) the amount of the remuneration, fees, unemployment benefits and any other compensation actually received by her since 1 January 2013 by way of replacement for the remuneration she was receiving as a temporary agent;

| — | order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to pay the costs.

---
p.1 

DAIKIN 

RECEIVED 

OPPT CBIC 

CBIC Control Number 

355268 

20I3JUL 19 AH 9:35 

DAIKIN AMERICA, INC. AUG 2 a ^ 3 

905 STATE DOCKS RD. (35601) 

P.O. BOX 2252 

DECATUR, ALABAMA 35609 

TEL. 256-306-5000 

FAX 256-306-5599 

Scanned & Processed in 

CIS by: SHARON 

July 18, 2013 

Attention: TSCA Declassification Coordinator 

U.S. EPA 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

Document Control Office (7407M) 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Sir or Madame: 

This is to inform you that Daikin America, Inc. release the claim of confidentiality 

regarding the attached document. This document was provided to the EPA in the 

course of the Fluoropolymer incineration ECA, docket ID 

number EPA-HO-OPPT-2003-0071. 

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Ralph Werling 

SHES Manager 

Daikin America, Inc. 
ddVO sJeutA|odQK>nu oj 

xjpueddy Jed uogejedejd e)(sodtuoo 

•ssiiietuoo 

!: 8 I- > 

# 5 

Si 

it 8 

:«
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of The Dexter Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-63959, 33-27597, 33-53307 and
33-53309) of our report dated February 1, 1996, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of The Dexter
Corporation as of December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, and for the years then
ended, appearing on page F-2 of The Dexter Corporation's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.
 
                                          /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
                                          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Springfield, Massachusetts
March 5, 1996
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2648 

To provide bankruptcy relief for student borrowers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2019 

Mr. NADLER (for himself, Mr. KATKO, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. SCANLON, Mr. 

SWALWELL of California, Mr. NEGUSE, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. 

CONNOLLY, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. COHEN, 

Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. DEAN, and Mr. CORREA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide bankruptcy relief for student borrowers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Borrower 

5 Bankruptcy Relief Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 (a) EXCEPTION TO DISCHARGE.—Section 523 of title 

8 11, United States Code, is amended in subsection (a), by 

9 striking paragraph (8). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2648 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1328(a)(2) 

2 of title 11, United States Code, is amended by striking 

3 ‘‘(8),’’. 

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

5 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub6 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this 

7 Act shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act. 

8 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend9 ments made by this Act shall apply only with respect to 

10 cases commenced under title 11, United States Code, on 

11 or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2016270EN.01003701.xml

| 25.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2016 — Magic Mountain Kletterhallen and Others v Commission

(Case T-162/13) (1)

1

((State aid - Aid for the construction and operation of climbing centres of Deutscher Alpenverein eV - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Aid scheme - More detailed economic analysis - Market failure - Legitimate objective in the public interest - Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU - Serious difficulties))

(2016/C 270/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Magic Mountain Kletterhallen GmbH (Berlin, Germany), Kletterhallenverband Klever eV (Leipzig, Germany), Neoliet Beheer BV (Son, Netherlands), and Pedriza BV (Haarlem, Netherlands) (represented by: initially M. von Oppen, A. Gerdung and R. Dreblow, then M. von Oppen, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendants: Deutscher Alpenverein eV (Munich, Germany), and Deutscher Alpenverein, Sektion Berlin eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: R. Geulen, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendants

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 8761 of 5 December 2012 on State aid SA.33952 (2012/NN) — Germany — Climbing centres of Deutscher Alpenverein.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Magic Mountain Kletterhallen GmbH, Kletterhallenverband Klever eV, Neoliet Beheer BV and Pedriza BV jointly and severally to bear the costs incurred by the European Commission and their own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Magic Mountain Kletterhallen GmbH, Kletterhallenverband Klever eV, Neoliet Beheer BV and Pedriza BV jointly and severally to bear the costs incurred by the European Commission and their own costs;

| 3. | Orders Deutscher Alpenverein eV and Deutscher Alpenverein, Sektion Berlin eV to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Deutscher Alpenverein eV and Deutscher Alpenverein, Sektion Berlin eV to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6640

JOHN THOMAS PARKER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, William Douglas Catoe, Director, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-1470-2-13AJ) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 27, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tara Dawn Shurling, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. DonaldJohn Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Thomas Parker appeals the district court’s order granting the Respondents’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. We uphold the district court’s determination that Parker has not demonstrated that his trial would have had a different outcome absent any alleged errors by counsel. See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Next generation pharmaceutical contract provides major benefits for military customers

/ Published July 29, 2022
PHILADELPHIA, 
A Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Medical team awarded a next generation pharmaceuticals prime vendor contract, on July 14, that will provide additional benefits to military customers and their dependents.

“This next generation contract supports the Defense Health Agency mail-order pharmacy program,” said Ruth Herman, DLA Troop Support pharmaceuticals prime vendor division chief.  “The biggest benefit is the increased cost avoidance on this generation of the contract.”

The contract was awarded to AmerisourceBergen Corp with a value of $28.9 billion, one of the largest single contracts issued by DLA, according to DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Eric P. Shirley.

“The successful award of a contract of this magnitude is a substantial undertaking,” Herman said.  “The Troop Support Medical team worked for more than a year to ensure it obtained and included every DHA requirement and met every acquisition law, regulation, and policy in making the award at an extremely favorable price to the government in a very unforgiving acquisition environment. 

Awarding a contract this size takes communication and coordination not just within Troop Support but across the agency. DLA Acquisition Procurement Analyst John Dempsey, worked with the Medical team to bring this award to fruition.

“Coordinating with the team at Troop Support in Philadelphia was seamless,” Dempsey said.

Together with the Dempsey and the DLA Acquisition team, Troop Support Medical held Integrated Acquisition Review Boards as part of the contract review process.

The IARB, brings together senior leaders throughout DLA to discuss the contract and identify any possible concerns, Dempsey said.

“This level of coordination helps to identify any strengths, weaknesses, and pitfalls with the action and ensures the Troop Support team hears a wider Agency perspective on the acquisition,” he added. “Coordination like this benefits DLA leaders by giving them insight into significant contract actions and the opportunity to shape how DLA supports its customers through its contracts.”

An additional benefit is the improved customer access to medications that may have been previously difficult to acquire.

“This contract will expand product availability to specialty pharmaceuticals,” Herman said. “Specialty pharmaceuticals are medications which treat chronic, complex, or rare diseases, and which have restrictions related to the distribution, care, delivery as well as generally have a higher cost.”

The work done to get this contract awarded shows the commitment DLA has to its customers.

“The Troop Support Medical team certainly demonstrated their understanding of the pharmaceutical market and how to continue to provide excellent support to DLA customers through the program,” Dempsey said.
EXHIBIT 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Venerando J. Indelicato, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

February 11, 2005
                                                     /s/ Venerando J. Indelicato
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Venerando J. Indelicato
                                                     Principal Financial Officer

                                       23
# C_2015398EN.01008002.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/80

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 October 2015 — Drakeford v EMA

(Case F-29/13) (1)

1

(2015/C 398/96)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 57.

1

---
No. 10-6286.

#### Gregory P. Lawler, Petitioner v. Hilton Hall, Warden.

562 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 570,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8708.

178 L. Ed. 2d 417,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Butts County, denied.
No. D-2572.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Robert Ray Stone, Jr.

562 U.S. 818, 131 S. Ct. 411,

178 L. Ed. 2d 275,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7534.

October 4, 2010.

Robert Ray Stone, Jr., of Arlington, Virginia, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350),
the undersigned, Murray P. Fish, Chief Financial Officer of Network-1 Security
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to
his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



                                                        /s/ Murray P. Fish
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Murray P. Fish
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                                        August 16, 2002
#### People v Genao

2d Dept: 145 AD3d 739 (Kings)

denied 3/27/17 (Stein, J.)
# San Joaquin’s Haynes selected as Defense Logistics Agency Firefighter of the Year

/ Published May 7, 2024
TRACY, Calif. , 
Mark Haynes, firefighter, Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management, San Joaquin, Security and Emergency Services Fire Department, was selected as the 2023 DLA Firefighter of the Year.

Haynes is a seasoned firefighter and is responsible for completing yearly inspections and flow tests on 19 MSA G1 Self Contained Breathing Apparatuses in compliance with National Fire Protection Association 1852 standards, resulting in firefighter safety in immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH) environments. Additionally, he stepped up to manage the power tools program and was able to secure funding of more than $82,000 of required power tools that are required or needed replacement.

Haynes also secured funding for 12 cardiopulmonary resuscitation classes that he instructed for installation personnel representing a 10 percent increase in trained personnel supporting installation emergency responses.

He has been in the forefront in mutual aid to the surrounding community. He was an intricate member of a flood response team for multiple days, aiding in evacuating residents from their homes and stranded drivers stuck in flood waters.

Haynes responded to a structure fire in a Tracy residential neighborhood surrounded by dry vegetation. Once the structure was contained, he combatted a five-acre vegetation fire, saving multiple homes.

A true leader, his leadership skills, knowledge and crew management led to his selection as acting captain over 14 shifts as needed for staff shortages to maintain continuity in the department. As acting captain, Haynes provided more than 80 hours of crew proficiency training. Further, he was tasked by fire department management to provide training to new department employees on vehicle operations and equipment.

Haynes takes initiative to enhance fire department operations. He conducted live fire exercises with the department and mutual aid partners resulting in enhanced training for all agencies. During his off time, he volunteered to take the unified command portion of Active Shooter training to keep on top of his duties.

He performs his firefighting skills off duty. Haynes witnessed a patron at an eating establishment in Elk Grove pass out and quickly assessed the situation, opened her airway, called 911 and passed patient care to the responding emergency medical services team on scene.

Haynes excels in his community. He volunteered countless hours in support of his local Future Farmers of America organization. Aiming for personal growth, he is currently enrolled at Golden Gate University, San Francisco, completing a bachelor’s degree. He previously obtained his associate degree in Fire Science from Las Positas College in Livermore.

“Firefighter Haynes is a true asset to the fire department,” said Jonathan Mathews, site director, DLA Installation Management, San Joaquin. “His tireless dedication to the fire department and contribution to the success of DLA’s mission warrants his selection for this prestigious award.”
# C_2015007EN.01003201.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2014 — Think Schuhwerk v OHIM — Müller (VOODOO)

(Case T-50/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark VOODOO - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of descriptive character - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c)of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 007/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Think Schuhwerk GmbH (Kopfing, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Andreas Müller (Ulm, Germany) (represented by: J. Pick, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 November 2012 (Case R 474/2012 4) concerning invalidity proceedings between Think Schuhwerk GmbH and Mr Andreas Müller

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders Think Schuhwerk GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Think Schuhwerk GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.

1

---
No. 10-5898.

#### Yolanda Parker, Petitioner v. Nancy Potter.

562 U.S. 980, 131 S. Ct. 443,

178 L. Ed. 2d 320,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8175.

October 18, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 8, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.