alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

I, Leo Greenfield, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Distribution Management Services, Inc. for the three months ended August 31, 2004;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 12, 2006



| |                                  
| | ---------------------------------
| | /s/Leo Greenfield                
| | Leo Greenfield                   
| | CEO, principal accounting officer
# C_2016305EN.01002502.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2016 — CW v Council

(Case T-516/13) (1)

1

((Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia - Freezing of funds - Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the basis of new grounds following the annulment of the previous measures freezing funds - Right to property - Proportionality - Factual error - Misuse of powers - Non-contractual liability - Causal link))

(2016/C 305/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CW (represented by: A. Tekari, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and M. Bishop, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, application based on Article 264 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2013/409/CFSP of 30 July 2013 implementing Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2013, L 204, p. 52), in so far as that decision concerns the applicant and, secondly, an application based on Article 268 TFEU and seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that CW shall bear his own costs and orders him to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that CW shall bear his own costs and orders him to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PSA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,246
<SECURITIES>                                     1,033
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,279
<PP&E>                                              15
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,245
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,023
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   126
<CGS>                                              107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    84
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (21)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,971)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
No. 10-5470.

#### David Barajas Navarro, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 923, 131 S. Ct. 304,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7474.

178 L. Ed. 2d 198,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 738.
Schedule of Change Control Agreements



 EXHIBIT 10(a)(7) 
  
 SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENTS 
  

			
	 	  	Term


	 Paul Durlacher
	  	12 months
	 H. P. Mechler
	  	12 months
	 J. Eric Story
	  	6 months
# Steffon Deyo, DLA Document Services, retired after 35 years

/ Published July 11, 2022
Fort Belvoir, Va., 
After 35 years of federal service, Defense Logistics Agency Document Services employee Steffon Deyo hung up his tie and retired in May.

Deyo spent his 35 years between Army, Navy and DLA civilian service. He started his career at Fort A.P. Hill in 1981 but took his first job in printing as a clerk in 1989. Deyo joined DLA in 1996 when the Department of Defense printing mission transitioned from the Navy to DLA. He continued as an electronic duplicating systems technician for several years and took a supervisor role from 2005-2008. Deyo then became a document automation specialist and worked at Fort Belvoir, Va. until his retirement.

Throughout Deyo’s time at Document Services, he performed various jobs which required technical skill, attention to detail, excellent customer service skills and financial acumen to ensure the best value was provided to customers

“Steffon always helped customers get what they need and treated everyone with dignity and respect,” said Document Services Director Richard TeBeau. “He was a valuable resource to the Document Services team in order to accomplish the mission; and he strived to ensure issues were handled at the lowest level possible”

“He was a good guy who cared about the organization” said Steven Sherman, former Document Services director who spent many years working with Deyo. “He understood the importance of front-line workers to the organization - we exist for the convenience of the customer. He got that!”

Deyo received many awards over the years and kudos from customers as well as coworkers.

We congratulate Steffon on his retirement and wish him well in his future endeavors.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2436

To amend title 1 of the United States Code to clarify the effect and

application of legislation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 14 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 1 of the United States Code to clarify the

effect and application of legislation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF THE EFFECT AND APPLICA4 TION OF LEGISLATION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 1 of the United

6 States Code is amended by adding at the end thereof the

7 following:
2

•S 2436 IS

1 ‘‘§ 7. Rules for the application and effect of legisla2 tion

3 ‘‘Any Act of Congress enacted after the effective date

4 of this section—

5 ‘‘(1) shall be prospective in application only;

6 ‘‘(2) shall not create a private claim or cause of

7 action; and

8 ‘‘(3) shall not preempt any other law, either

9 State or Federal,

10 unless a provision of the Act clearly expresses a contrary

11 intention and specifically refers to the paragraph of this

12 section intended to be negated.’’.

13 (b) CHAPTER ANALYSIS.—The chapter analysis for

14 chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by

15 adding at the end thereof the following:

‘‘7. Rules for application and effect of legislation.’’.

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

17 this Act shall take effect 180 days after the date of enact18 ment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 10.3



 





EXHIBIT 10.3




AMENDMENT NO. 3

TO

HARRIS CORPORATION

1997 DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED COMPENSATION

AND ANNUAL STOCK UNIT AWARD PLAN




     WHEREAS, Harris Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), has
heretofore adopted and maintains the Harris Corporation 1997 Directors’
Deferred Compensation and Annual Stock Unit Award Plan (the “Plan”) to provide
certain benefits to the members of the Company’s Board of Directors who are not
employees of the Company (capitalized terms not defined in this amendment
having the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan); and



     WHEREAS, the Plan is classified as a “nonqualified deferred compensation
plan” under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”); and



     WHEREAS, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 added a new Section 409A
of the Code which is effective for amounts deferred after December 31, 2004,
under certain deferred compensation plans and for amounts deferred under
certain non-qualified deferred compensation plans that were in existence on
October 3, 2004, and that are materially modified thereafter in a manner not
permitted under guidance to be published by the U.S. Treasury Department; and



     WHEREAS, the Company desires that all compensation deferred by members of
the Board of Directors of the Company under the Plan not be subject to Section
409A of the Code; and



     WHEREAS, the Company therefore desires to amend the Plan to cease all
deferrals of Director Compensation and awards of Annual Units provided under
the Plan, effective as of December 31, 2004.



     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 12
of the Plan, the Plan hereby is amended, effective as of December 31, 2004, as
follows:



     1. Section 1 of the Plan hereby is amended to add the following sentence
at the end thereof:




Effective as of December 31, 2004, no further deferrals
of Director Compensation shall be permitted and no
further awards of Annual Units shall be granted under
the Plan.



     2. Section 3 of the Plan hereby is amended to add the following new
subsection (d):



 









 






     (d) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this
Section 3 and any provision in the Plan to the contrary, no
deferrals of Director Compensation shall be permitted for
calendar years commencing after December 31, 2004.



     3. Section 5 of the Plan hereby is amended to add the following new
subsection (c):




     (c) Cessation of Annual Unit Awards. Notwithstanding the
foregoing provisions of this Section 5 and any provision in the
Plan to the contrary, no awards of Annual Units shall be granted
after December 31, 2004.



     APPROVED AND AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS this 3rd day of
December, 2004.



	 	 	 
	

	 	HARRIS CORPORATION
	 
	 	 
	

	 	/s/ Howard Lance

	

	 	Howard L. Lance
	

	 	Chairman of the Board,
	

	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	 
	ATTEST:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Scott T. Miknen

	 	 
	Corporate Secretary
#### Ana Valdes, Respondent, v Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc., Defendant, and Altamont Program, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 436]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Altamont Program appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Toussaint, J.), dated March 16, 2016, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff alleged that she slipped and fell on liquid on the floor of a cafeteria operated, at the time of the subject accident, by the defendant Altamont Program (hereinafter the defendant). The plaintiff thereafter commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries. The defendant moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, on the ground, as relevant here, that it did not have notice of the alleged dangerous condition. The Supreme Court denied its motion, and the defendant appeals.

A defendant has constructive notice of a dangerous condition when the condition is visible and apparent, and has existed for a sufficient length of time before the accident such that it could have been discovered and corrected *(see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836, 837 [1986]; *Kyte v Mid-Hudson Wendico,*131 AD3d 452, 453 [2015]). Here, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the defendant failed to demonstrate, prima facie, that it lacked *927constructive notice of the alleged dangerous condition. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the deposition testimony of the cafeteria supervisor, which only referred to general cleaning practices and did not establish when, prior to the subject accident, the area was last cleaned or inspected, failed to demonstrate that the alleged condition existed for an insufficient amount of time for it to have been remedied *(see Schwartz v Gold Coast Rest. Corp.,*139 AD3d 696 [2016]; *Herman v Lifeplex, LLC,*106 AD3d 1050, 1051 [2013]; *Birnbaum v New York Racing Assn., Inc.,*57 AD3d 598 [2008]). The defendant’s failure to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law required the denial of its motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s papers in opposition *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]).

Chambers, J.P., Sgroi, Duffy and Barros, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Daniel L. Korpolinski,certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Stressgen BiotechnologiesCorporation (the “company”);

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Thecompany’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

a.             designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.             evaluated theeffectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation;

 

c.             disclosed in thisreport any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the report that has materiallyaffected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Thecompany’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

 

a.             all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b.             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  August 5, 2004 |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
|                       |
|                       | /s/ Daniel  L. Korpolinski |   |
|                       | Daniel L.  Korpolinski |
|                       | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P; AA-8096-03]


Notice for Publication; Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Sec. 14(e) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 
December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(e), will be issued to Chugach 
Alaska Corporation for approximately 11,572 acres. The lands involved 
are in the vicinity of Icy Bay, Alaska.

Copper River Meridian, Alaska

T. 21 S., R. 24 E.,
T. 21 S., R. 25 E.,
T. 22 S., R. 25 E.,
T. 23 S., R. 25 E.,
T. 21 S., R. 26 E.

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Anchorage Daily News. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until July 24, 1998 to file an appeal. However, 
parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days from the 
date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau 
of Land Management at the address identified above, where the 
requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do not 
file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, 
Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Chris Sitbon,
Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team, Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 98-16732 Filed 6-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
No. 09-6865.

#### Graciano Marquez-Huazo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1078, 131 S. Ct. 632,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9147.

178 L. Ed. 2d 508,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 337 Fed. Appx. 652.
No. 10-6392.

#### Anthony Deshaun Johnson, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1047, 131 S. Ct. 603,

178 L. Ed. 2d 440,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8942.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2013233EN.01001401.xml

| 10.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/14

---

Action brought on 24 June 2013 — ZZ v EEAS

(Case F-59/13)

2013/C 233/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. de Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s application to have his successive fixed-term employment contracts reclassified as a contract of indefinite duration and to have his period completed as an auxiliary member of the contract staff recognised as a period of service completed as a member of the contract staff.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision rejecting the applicant’s application; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision rejecting the applicant’s application;

| — | Reclassify his contract of an auxiliary member of the contract staff as a contract of indefinite duration of a member of the contract staff under Article 3a of the CEOS; |
| --- | --- |

—

Reclassify his contract of an auxiliary member of the contract staff as a contract of indefinite duration of a member of the contract staff under Article 3a of the CEOS;

| — | Order the EEAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the EEAS to pay the costs.

---