alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert A McKitchen, Also Known as Robert McKithen, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 438]

— Appeal from a judgment of Erie County Court (Drury, J.), entered October 31, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45 [5]) and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree (§ 165.05 [1]). Defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal was knowing, voluntary and intelligent *(see People v Baxter,*302 AD2d 950, 951 [2003], *lv denied*99 NY2d 652 [2003]), and that waiver encompasses defendant’s contention with regard to the severity of the enhanced sentence *(see People v Melendez,*291 AD2d 887, 888 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 639 [2002]). Defendant’s remaining contention is not preserved for our review *(see People v Harris,*289 AD2d 1068 [2001], *lv denied*98 NY2d 637 [2002]), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
# Susquehanna installation military help local community have a happy Thanksgiving

/ Published Nov. 25, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
For many local community members, a Thanksgiving meal can be difficult to afford.  On Nov. 20, military members and their spouses stationed at Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna helped the West Shore Senior Center provide meals to those in need.
The West Shore Senior Center opens a food bank once per month, and for November, offered a special meal including a turkey to help community members.  The food bank is staffed by volunteers from local churches, civic organizations, and others who would like to lend a hand.  

This month, Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna members, including Defense Logistics Agency Distribution commander Army Brig. Gen. Richard Dix, volunteered their time to help people fill carts.  The team also loaded and delivered meals to local shut-ins who would otherwise be unable to have a Thanksgiving meal.

“General Dix’s staff is awesome – this is the smoothest delivery we have ever had,” said Tanya Seidel, the director of the food bank.

Much of the food provided by the bank is donated by local grocers and churches.  The food bank also makes special purchases with donated funds through the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank.

“We are so appreciative for each and every one who came and helped out,” said Ed Ulsh, a former director of the food bank who still volunteers.  “I’d like to give special attention to General Dix and his staff for helping us out today.  I want to wish everyone a happy Thanksgiving.”
No. D-2506.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of William R. Chambers.

562 U.S. 809, 131 S. Ct. 399,

178 L. Ed. 2d 264,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7486.

October 4, 2010.

William R. Chambers, of Scottsdale, Arizona, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16892]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. SA98-84-000]

Inter-American Energy Corporation; Notice of Petition for 
Adjustment

June 19, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 16, 1998, Inter-American Energy 
Corporation (Inter-American) filed a petition, pursuant to section 
502(c) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, for relief from making 
the Kansas ad valorem tax refunds required by the Commission's 
September 10, 1997 order, in Docket No. RP97-369-000 et al [80 FERC 
para. 61,264 (1997); rehearing denied January 28, 1998, 82 FERC para. 
61,058 (1998)], on remand from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals,\1\ 
that directed First Sellers to make Kansas ad valorem tax refunds, with 
interest, for the period from 1983 to 1988. Inter-American states that 
it received a $99,878.06 refund claim ($35,771.02 in principal and 
$64,107.04 in interest) form Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG), 
that it is a small oil and gas company owned predominantly by one 76 
year old man who's sole means of support comes from this small company, 
and that Inter-American's financial status cannot absorb the refund 
claimed by CIG, even if amortized over five years. Therefore, Inter-
American requests to be relieved from making the refund to CIG. Inter-
American's petition is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Public Service Company of Colorado v. FERC, 91 F.3d 1478 
(D.C. 1996), cert. denied, Nos. 96-954 and 96-1230 (65 U.S.L.W. 3751 
and 3754, May 12, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said petition should on or before 15 days after the date 
of publication in the Federal Register of this notice, file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, 
DC 204526, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the 
requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.214, 385.211, 385.1105, and 385.1106). All protests filed with 
the Commission will be considered by it in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties 
to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding 
or to participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a motion 
to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16892 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD): 

ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN 

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT: 

Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers 

April 2010 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Assistant Secretary 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards 

Washington, DC 20585 
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy
 

by staff members of
 

Navigant Consulting, Inc. 

and 

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
No. 10-6643.

#### Vincent A. Lowe, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 538,

178 L. Ed. 2d 396,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8427.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 392 Fed. Appx. 477.
Guaranty
 LEAP WIRELESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CRICKET LICENSEE (REAUCTION), INC.
CRICKET LICENSEE I, INC.
CHASETEL REAL ESTATE HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
CRICKET ALABAMA PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET ARIZONA PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET ARKANSAS PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET CALIFORNIA PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET COLORADO PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET FLORIDA PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET GEORGIA PROPERTY COMPANY, INC.
CRICKET IDAHO PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET ILLINOIS PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET INDIANA PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET KANSAS PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET KENTUCKY PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET MICHIGAN PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET MINNESOTA PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET MISSISSIPPI PROPERTY




---



##### 



COMPANY
CRICKET NEBRASKA PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET NEVADA PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET NEW MEXICO PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET NEW YORK PROPERTY COMPANY, INC.
CRICKET NORTH CAROLINA PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET OHIO PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET OKLAHOMA PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET OREGON PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET PENNSYLVANIA PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET TEXAS PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET UTAH PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET WASHINGTON PROPERTY COMPANY
CRICKET WISCONSIN PROPERTY COMPANY By:
    /s/ S. DOUGLAS HUTCHESONName:
    S. Douglas HutchesonTitle:
    CEOCRICKET LICENSEE 2007, LLCBy:
    Cricket Licensee (Reauction), Inc.Its Manager and sole memberBy:
    /s/ S. DOUGLAS HUTCHESONName:
    S. Douglas HutchesonTitle:
    CEOHARGRAY WIRELESS, LLCBy:
    Cricket Communications, Inc.Its Manager and sole memberBy:
    /s/ S. DOUGLAS HUTCHESONName:
    S. Douglas HutchesonTitle:
    CEO
# Land and Maritime’s workforce training strengthens lifecycle logistics initiatives

/ Published Oct. 30, 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio,
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34197-34198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 55-22234-SP ASLBP No. 98-745-01-SP]


Randall L. Herring; Designation of Presiding Officer

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28710 (1972), and Secs. 2.105, 
2.700, 2.702, 2.714, 2.714a, 2.717 and 2.1207 of the Commission's 
Regulations, a single member of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
Panel is hereby designated to rule on petitions for leave to intervene 
and/or requests for hearing and, if necessary, to serve as the 
Presiding Officer to conduct an informal adjudicatory hearing in the 
following proceeding.

Randall L. Herring

(Denial of Reactor Operator's License Application)

    The hearing, if granted, will be conducted pursuant to 10 CFR Part 
2 Subpart L of the Commission's Regulations, ``Informal Hearing 
Procedures for Adjudications in Materials and Operator Licensing 
Proceedings.'' This proceeding concerns a denial by NRC Staff of Mr. 
Herring's reactor operator's license application and Mr. Herring's 
request for a hearing pursuant to 10 CFR Section 2.103.
    The Presiding Officer in this proceeding is Administrative Judge 
Charles Bechhoefer. Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR Sec. 2.722, 
the Presiding Officer has appointed Administrative Judge Richard F. 
Cole to assist the Presiding Officer in taking evidence and in 
preparing a suitable record for review.
    All correspondence, documents and other materials shall be filed 
with Judge Bechhoefer and Judge Cole in accordance with Sec. 2.701. 
Their addresses are:

Administrative Judge Charles Bechhoefer, Presiding Officer, Atomic 
Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, D.C. 20555

[[Page 34198]]

Dr. Richard F. Cole, Special Assistant, Atomic Safety and Licensing 
Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of June 1998.
B. Paul Cotter, Jr.,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 98-16639 Filed 6-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
2017-0717.

#### Hilliard City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2016-297.
# Bahrain distribution center participates in Army Watercraft testing mission

/ Published Feb. 5, 2016
MANAMA, Bahrain, 
Due to an increase in responsibilities, DLA Distribution Bahrain was looking to tap into agency resources within the region, coordinating with DLA Disposition Kuwait to determine if demilitarization capabilities existed within their local mission. At the same time and as part of the process to establish the Trans Arabian Network, DLA Support Team - Kuwait was looking for opportunities to test the Army watercraft mission. 

Army watercraft systems are critical enablers in overcoming austere access challenges. Army watercraft are designed to operate in austere to bare beach environments. These unique assets are not dependent on developed seaports or infrastructure and can operate in shallow draft, littoral and inland waterways. 

In addition to traditional distribution capabilities, DLA Distribution Bahrain also manages the Mapping Support Office which supports U.S. Central Command, as the largest mapping customer of the Combatant Commands. With that comes a high volume of mapping demilitarization requirements that keep warehouse stock rotating and up to date.  While the distribution center has an industrial shredder, it alone cannot keep up with the monthly demilitarization volume of nearly 120 disposals for more than 6,600 products. 

"The use of the Army watercraft is a cost-effective means of transporting cargo throughout the region and tremendously reduce our transportation costs,” explained Army Lt. Col. Ronald Eggelston of DLA Disposition Services. “Another benefit is that instead of multiple DLA agencies within the same region duplicating efforts, we are able to consolidate our requirements and have a ‘One DLA’ solution that promotes teamwork." 

Having a number of other shipments for Kuwait, DLA Disposition Bahrain ordered containers while DLA Support Team - Kuwait ordered a vessel from the 831st Transportation Battalion. On Dec. 22, Distribution filled one 20-foot container with 18 pallets of maps and geographical CD-ROMs, while Disposition transported four containers and one Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle from the Port of Mina Salman to Camp Arifjan, Kuwait.  

"The process concluded seamlessly and the 831st Transportation Unit handled this evolution in an expeditious manner. This system will now be a major advantage in the transportation of our material to assist in cost-saving efforts,” concluded DLA Disposition Bahrain site manager, Nick Lulay.
RE: EGU MACT inquiry 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: Bill Maxwell 

 03/02/2011 01:27 PM 

 Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Jeb Stenhouse, Kevin Culligan 

 

Hi Bob, 

I'll forward the response to Holmes -- thanks! 

Cortney 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 1:26 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov; Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov; 

Culligan.Kevin@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Re: EGU MACT inquiry 

Cortney: 

The e-mail below came in as a result of the interagency review of the 

Toxics Rule package. We weren't sure whether you'd rather forward the 

response to Holmes or whether you'd rather we respond directly. 

The answer is the new-source MACT floor number for Hg is 0.00001 lb/GWh. 

There is, indeed, a large difference between the existing- and 

new-source floor values due to the construct of the statute (i.e., top 

performing 12 percent for existing vs. top single performer for new) and 

the difference becomes larger the more units are included in the "top 

performing 12 percent" pool. 

We are working to get you the MACT floor TSD and the supporting 

spreadsheets. 

Thanks. 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450 

From: "Hummel, Holmes" <Holmes.Hummel@hq.doe.gov> 

To: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 03/01/2011 08:57 PM 
Subject: EGU MACT inquiry 

Hi Jeb, 

I'm pouring over the EGU MACT comments coming in from the energy program 

offices at DOE, and I am puzzled by what appears to be a very, very 

stringent Hg standard for new plants. 

Is it at all possible that EPA intended the Hg MACT floor for new 

sources to be 0.00001 lb/MWh rather than 0.00001 lb/GWh? - or would you 

let me know who I should ask? 

The standards between existing and new appear to be ~3 orders of 

magnitude apart, which is raising curiosity/concern. I'd like to avoid 

preparing extensive comments on something that boils down to unit 

labels. 

Holmes
# Observing National Preparedness Month on DSCR

/ Published Sept. 27, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond’s Security and Emergency Services hosted a Preparedness Expo Sept. 26 in the DLA Aviation Operations Center (Bldg. 46).   

National Preparedness Month is observed every September to raise awareness about the importance of preparing for disasters and emergencies that could happen at any time.

Representatives from Security and Emergency Services, as well as Emergency Management, Physical Security, Antiterrorism, Family Advocacy, Police, and Fire and Emergency services were on hand at the expo. They shared information on a variety preparedness and response topics, such as natural and man-made disasters, domestic violence prevention, active shooter response, suspicious activity reporting, crime prevention, fire safety and other preparedness related topics.

Julio Clavell, Installation Emergency Manager, said the aim of the expo was bringing awareness to the workforce.

“Events like this expo helps us prepare our employees, not just here at work, but they can take the knowledge and go home and prepare their families and friends”, Clavell said. “It’s a good informational campaign that will only get better over time.”

Additional resources:

iWATCH DLA

If You See Something, Say Something (YouTube Video)
No. 10-5484.

#### Michael Turner White, Petitioner v. Henry Guzman, et al.

562 U.S. 924, 131 S. Ct. 307,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7203,

178 L. Ed. 2d 199,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.

Same case below, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1434, 927 N.E.2d 8.
# DSCC Shred Day accomplishes goal

/ Published April 25, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, Defense Supply Center Columbus held its annual Shred Day April 20 on the installation. Associates were encouraged to bring anything they wanted shredded, including personal and work documents. DSCC’s Environmental Division chief, Forrest (Chip) Williams II, said they processed 7.56 Tons of paper, which translates to:• 129 Trees Saved• 52,920 Gallons of Water Saved• 30,996 Kw of Energy Saved• 454 Pounds of Pollutants kept from Atmosphere• 38 Cubic Yards of landfill saved“This not only helps the environment but contributes to the increase of our Solid Waste Diversion rate!” Williams said. Participation increased by 89% from last September’s Shred Day
# Distribution headquarters’ Ross wins Employee of the Quarter

/ Published Dec. 22, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 

Margaret “Meg” Ross, supervisory contract specialist at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution headquarters’ Acquisition Operations, has been awarded the Distribution Employee of the Quarter award for fourth quarter, fiscal year 2015, for her superior performance and teamwork.

Ross serves as the contracting officer for the Depot Support-West team, executing the most critical and complex contracting actions in the division, most of which are valued in the multi-million dollar range.  She is the primary contracting officer for distribution center contract awards, and ensures these critical acquisitions meet milestones and are awarded in a timely manner.  

“Meg’s expert knowledge in Department of Defense source selection procedures is unsurpassed and ensures DLA Distribution’s contracting actions deliver quality, timely products and services to the warfighter and the nation at the best value for the taxpayer,” said Perry Knight, Chief Integration officer.

One of Ross’ highest priorities is the integrity and quality of the acquisition process and associated documentation.  As evidenced by the Internal Contract Quality Review, Ross consistently awards high-quality, compliant contracting actions with a less than 1 percent error rate.  For actions requiring DLA headquarters’ review, she receives constant praise for well documented, thorough analysis.  

Ross willingly mentors newly-appointed supervisors and contracting officers, in addition to her team.  “No matter how busy she may be, she will make the time to provide guidance to contract specialists and peers,” said Knight.  “Ms. Ross’ selflessness and devotion to growing the knowledge, skills and abilities of those around her are unmatched.  She leverages her significant experience, business acumen, and contracting knowledge each and every day to best serve DLA and DLA Distribution.”
#### IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD M. NICHOLS.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 691)

(406 SE2d 481)

Decided July 2, 1991.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

*Robert H. Preston,*for Nichols.

Per curiam.

Richard M. Nichols petitioned the State Bar of Georgia for reinstatement to the practice of law. Nichols voluntarily surrendered his license in 1976 following a plea of guilty to the charge of appropriating funds belonging to a bankrupt’s estate while acting as trustee of such estate. Nichols was sentenced to five years imprisonment but was released after having served approximately 11 months. He first applied for reinstatement to the Bar in May of 1980. Following adverse recommendations from the Special Master and the State Disciplinary Board, this court denied Nichols’ application, holding that he had not offered clear and convincing evidence that he was sufficiently rehabilitated. *In the Matter of*Nichols, 248 Ga. 254 (282 SE2d 341) (1981).

As to the present application for reinstatement, the Special Master concluded that Nichols “has established his rehabilitation by clear and convincing proof and that he is entitled to be re-admitted to the practice of law in this State.” The Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the Special Master’s report and recommended that Nichols be reinstated pursuant to the provisions of State Bar Rules 4-302 and 4-305. We adopt the recommendation of the Review Panel and approve Nichols’ reinstatement pursuant to Rule 4-302 and subject to Nichols’ satisfaction of all requirements of Rule 4-305.

*Reinstatement approved.*

*All the Justices concur, except Hunt, J., who dissents; Clarke, C. J., not participating.*