alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2331 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2331

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend or make permanent 
         certain authorities and requirements under that title.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 28 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

Mr. Rockefeller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend or make permanent 
         certain authorities and requirements under that title.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR WAIVER OF REDUCTION OF RETIREMENT 
              PAY FOR REGISTERED-NURSE POSITIONS.

    Section 7426(c) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking out the second sentence.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT REQUIREMENT FOR REVIEW OF AGREEMENTS FOR SPECIAL PAY 
              FOR PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS.

    Section 7432(d) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking out paragraph (4).

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO ENHANCED-USE LEASES.

    Section 8169 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking out ``December 31, 1994'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``December 31, 1996''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Excelsior Capital LLC v K&L Gates LLP

1st Dept: 138 AD3d 492

denied
# C_2014194EN.01003902.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/39

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 14 May 2014 — Delcroix v EEAS

(Case F-11/13) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Official - EEAS - Head of delegation in a third country - Transfer to the seat of the EEAS - Early termination of functions as head of delegation))

2014/C 194/57

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nicola Delcroix (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, then D. Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: initially, R. Metsola and S. Marquardt, Agents, then S. Marquardt, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision to transfer the applicant to a post at the seat of the EEAS and to terminate his posting at the EU delegation in Djibouti.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision, communicated by letter of 8 March 2012, to transfer Mr Delcroix to the seat of the European External Action Service and to thereby terminate early his posting as head of the European Union delegation in the Republic of Djibouti; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision, communicated by letter of 8 March 2012, to transfer Mr Delcroix to the seat of the European External Action Service and to thereby terminate early his posting as head of the European Union delegation in the Republic of Djibouti;

| 2. | Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Delcroix. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Delcroix.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 27/04/2013, p. 29.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1692]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-1174-000]


West Texas Utilities Company; Notice of Filing

January 20, 1998.
    Take notice that on December 19, 1997, West Texas Utilities Company 
(WTU), submitted for filing a Control Area Services Agreement Among 
West Texas Utilities Company and Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative, 
Inc., and LG&E Power Marketing (the Agreement) pursuant to which WTU 
will sell a package of control area services to Rayburn Country 
Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Rayburn), and LG&WE Energy Marketing Inc. 
(formerly known as LG&E Power Marketing Inc.) (LPM).
    WTU seeks an effective date of May 22, 1998. Accordingly, WTU seeks 
waiver of the Commission's notice requirements to permit WTU to file 
the Agreement more than 120 days in advance of the requested effective 
date. WTU has served copies of the filing on Rayburn, LPM and the 
Public Utility Commission of Texas.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before February 2, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1692 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2016364EN.01004501.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/45

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 1 August 2016 — Sajewicz-Świackiewcz v Commission

(Case F-39/13) (1)

((Civil Service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes - Decision on recognition of additional pensionable years applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 364/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jolanta Sajewicz-Świackiewcz (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by: D. de Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, subsequently by D. de Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers, then by J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers, and lastly by J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: C. Ehrbar and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, subsequently by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, then by G. Gattinara, acting as Agent, and lastly by G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision fixing the credit for the pension rights acquired prior to entry into service at the Commission pursuant to the new GIP and the decision rejecting the complaint.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 60.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2395 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2395

   To designate the United States Federal Building and Courthouse in 
    Detroit, Michigan, as the ``Theodore Levin Federal Building and 
                 Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 16 (legislative day, August 11), 1994

  Mr. Riegle introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the United States Federal Building and Courthouse in 
    Detroit, Michigan, as the ``Theodore Levin Federal Building and 
                 Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. THEODORE LEVIN FEDERAL BUILDING AND COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Redesignation.--The courthouse facility located at 231 West 
Lafayette, in Detroit, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 
``Theodore Levin Federal Building and Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the courthouse facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Theodore Levin Federal Building and Courthouse''.

                                 <all>
```
No. 10-6306.

#### Placido LaBoy, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 1032, 131 S. Ct. 571,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8718.

178 L. Ed. 2d 418,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.
No. 10-6642.

No. 10-6648.

#### Mark Manners, Petitioner v. United States. Andrew Siebert, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1017, 131 S. Ct. 538,

178 L. Ed. 2d 395,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8382.

November 1, 2010.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same cases below, 384 Fed. Appx. 302.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

The undersigned officerof Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to hisknowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which thiscertification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. Inaccordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification(A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theExchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and(B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filingunder the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that theCompany specifically incorporates it by reference.
| Date:  August 8, 2007 | /s/ Mark T. Frost                            |   |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Name: Mark T. Frost                          |
|                  | Title: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
No. 10-6351.

#### Walter Wojtczak, Petitioner v. Safeco Property & Casualty Insurance Companies, et al.

562 U.S. 1046, 131 S. Ct. 600,

178 L. Ed. 2d 439,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8912.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 10-5649.

#### Jonathan Wayne Larrabee, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 933, 131 S. Ct. 332,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7265.

178 L. Ed. 2d 216,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
#### People v Chirse

3d Dept: 146 AD3d 1031 (Albany)

denied 3/31/17 (Fahey, J.)
No. 10-6394.

#### Bienvenido Ramirez-Leonardo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 975, 131 S. Ct. 495,

178 L. Ed. 2d 313,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7864.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 362.
Exhibit 31.1

302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Walter H. Wulf, Jr., certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Monarch Cement
    Company;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
    of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
    the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
    statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
    by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material
    respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
    flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
    report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
    defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
    and have:

    a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
        supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
        registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
        to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
        in which this report is being prepared;

    b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
        the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
        the end of the period covered by this report based on such
        evaluation;

    c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred during the
        registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
        or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
        internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
    to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
    board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
        or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        control over financial information.


Date: August 14, 2003

                                         /s/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                         Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                         President and Chairman of the Board
# DLA earns DoD recognition for hiring people with disabilities

/ Published July 27, 2016
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Lithuania (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Lithuania (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4.76   | 6.83   | 10.51  | 6.23   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
S92A0018.

#### PHILLIPS v. TITTLE.

(411 SE2d 871)

Fletcher, Justice.

We granted this discretionary application to consider whether the trial court should have issued an unconditional order providing for the arrest and ten-day incarceration of Sheila Diane Phillips. The trial court found Phillips in contempt of court for failing to comply with the parties’ 1991 divorce decree. We find the order held Phillips in civil contempt without condition and remand for the trial court to enter a conditional order.

Since the trial court does not specify whether it found Phillips in civil or criminal contempt, we must examine the purpose of the contempt order. See *Ensley v. Ensley,*239 Ga. 860 (238 SE2d 920) (1977). “ ‘Where the primary purpose is to preserve the court’s authority and to punish for disobedience of its orders, the contempt is criminal. Where the primary purpose is to provide a remedy for an injured suitor and to coerce compliance with an order, the contempt is civil.’ ” Id. at 861, citing 17 AmJur2d 7, Contempt, § 4. Because the *821purpose of the contempt order in this case is to obtain the wife’s compliance with the divorce decree, the contempt is civil.

Decided January 16, 1992.

*Thomas M. Strickland,*for appellant.

*James W. Smith,*for appellee.

“Civil contempt orders imposing a sentence to jail for violation of visitation rights should be conditioned upon compliance.” *Easley v. Easley,*238 Ga. 180, 181 (231 SE2d 763) (1977). The trial court, however, neglected to condition Phillips’ ten-day sentence on her failure to purge herself of contempt. We remand for the trial court to modify its contempt order to make Phillips’ sentence conditional on her failure to comply with the court’s order.

*Judgment remanded.*

*Clarke, C. J., Weltner, P. J., Bell, Hunt and Benham, JJ., concur.*
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

J.D.R., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5525 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed May 16, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Sherwood Coleman, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

The undersignedofficer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report onForm 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”)promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) ofItem 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject tothe liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporatesit by reference.
| Date:  May 10, 2007 |                                                                 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | /s/ Thomas E. D’Ambra                                           |   |
|                | Name: Thomas E. D’Ambra, Ph.D.                                  |
|                | Title: Chairman of the Board, President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----