alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15335]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB for 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
plans to submit the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for 
OMB review and approval of the information collection system described 
below.

    Type of Review: Renewal of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Transfer Agent Registration and Amendment Form.
    Form Number: TA-1.
    OMB Number: 3064-0026.
    Annual Burden:
      Estimated annual number of respondents:--28.
      Estimated time per response--1.25 hours (initial registration); 
.17 hours (amendment).
    Average annual burden hours--14 hours.
    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: August 31, 1998.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Washington, D.C. 20503.
    FDIC Contact: Tamara R. Manly, (202) 898-7453, Office of the 
Executive Security, Room F-4058, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 
550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20429
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted on or before July 9, 1998 to both the OMB 
reviewer and the FDIC contact listed above.

ADDRESSES: Information about this submission, including copies of the 
proposed collection of information, may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 17A(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 (15 USC 78q) requires a bank to register with the 
appropriate Federal bank regulator prior to performing any transfer 
agent function. Under FDIC regulation 12 CFR 341, an insured nonmember 
bank uses form TA-1 to register with the FDIC.

    Dated: June 4, 1998.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15335 Filed 6-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
# C_2016078EN.01001501.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Tilly-Sabco v Commission

(Case T-397/13) (1)

1

((Agriculture - Export refund - Poultry meat - Implementing regulation fixing the refund at EUR 0 - Action for annulment - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 164(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 - Legitimate expectations))

(2016/C 078/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tilly-Sabco (Guerlesquin, France) (represented by: R. Milchior, F. Le Roquais and S. Charbonnel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and K. Skelly, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Doux SA (Châteaulin, France) (represented by: J. Vogel, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 of 18 July 2013 fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat (OJ 2013 L 196, p. 13).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tilly-Sabco to pay its own costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tilly-Sabco to pay its own costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings;

| 4. | Orders Doux SA to pay its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Doux SA to pay its own costs;

| 5. | Orders the French Republic to pay its own costs incurred as an intervener in the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the French Republic to pay its own costs incurred as an intervener in the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 291, 5.10.2013.

1

---
No. 09-11324.

#### Jemaine Monteil Cannon, Petitioner v. Chester Mason, et al.

562 U.S. 874, 131 S. Ct. 178,

178 L. Ed. 2d 107,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6773.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 969.
July 6, 2015

Christopher La Berge

11442 Bristle Oaks Terrace

Austin, TX 78750

Dear Mr. Christopher La Berge:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 9, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0960), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
7/2/2015 Regulations.gov ­ Other Document

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA­2015­0960­0001 1/2

Christopher La Berge - Exemption/Rulemaking

This Other document was issued by the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA)

For related information, Open Docket Folder

Content

Im filling a Section 333 exemption to fly my drone for my

photography company.

Comment Now!

ID: FAA­2015­0960­0001

Document Information

Date Posted:

Apr 9, 2015

Show More Details

Submitter Information

Submitter Name:

Christopher La Berge

Mailing Address:

11442 Bristle Oaks Terrace

City:

Austin

Country:

United States

State or Province:

TX

ZIP/Postal Code:

78750

Comments

0

Docket Information

This document is contained in

FAA­2015­0960

Related Dockets:

None

Related RINs:

Comments Received*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<CIK>                     0000031364
<NAME>                    Eckerd Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000               
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Feb-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jan-31-1998
<CASH>                                              24,883
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      144,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,000
<INVENTORY>                                      1,290,708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,462,540
<PP&E>                                             951,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                     384,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,620,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              831,638
<BONDS>                                          1,378,931
<COMMON>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         267,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,620,080
<SALES>                                          6,111,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,111,187
<CGS>                                            4,771,318
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,771,318
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,096,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     4,365
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  65,589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    173,835
<INCOME-TAX>                                        66,298
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                107,537
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0  
<NET-INCOME>                                       107,537
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
# A community celebrates DLA Distribution’s incoming and outgoing leaders with Hail and Farewell 

/ Published June 22, 2015
TEXARKANA, Texas, 
Friends, family, coworkers and local government officials gathered together inside the Texarkana College’s Truman Arnold Student Center for the Hail and Farewell ceremony of Army Lt. Col. Anthony A. Stoeger and Army Lt. Col. Milton G. Kelly June 11. The ceremony was hosted by the Texarkana Chamber of Commerce. 
Dennis Lewis, the chamber’s Military Affairs Committee chairman, emceed the evening’s program, stating Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Red River is host Red River Army Depot’s largest tenant and an essential element of supply and distribution for the U.S. Department of Defense.

Paying tribute to outgoing commander Kelly’s leadership and experience, Lewis said Kelly has guided DLA Distribution Red River to solid performance.

“Under his leadership, DLA Distribution Red River has implemented several initiatives to enhance workforce development. The major step forward was the implementation of standard operating procedures for hiring. With the increase in workload coupled with the streamlining of hiring, the staffing level of the organization increased from about 500 to more than 600 employees,” said Lewis.

The program continued with Kelly taking the podium. “I had a great time with the community here in Texarkana,” said Kelly. “I would like to retire here, if possible.”

Incoming commander Stoeger said it was great to be back in Texas, having previously served at Fort Hood. “It’s good to see grass, trees and water again.”

Stoeger replaced Kelly in the DLA Distribution Red River Change of Command ceremony the following morning, June 12.
No. 10-7108.

#### Robert Lee Artic, Sr., Petitioner v. Wisconsin.

562 U.S. 1074, 131 S. Ct. 671,

178 L. Ed. 2d 500,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9126.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.

Same case below, 327 Wis. 2d 392, 768 N.W.2d 430.
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Distribution Management Services, Inc., Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three-months ending August 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leo Greenfield, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



January 12, 2006



| |                                                                   
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/Leo Greenfield                                                 
| | Leo Greenfield                                                    
| | CEO, principal executive officer and 
principal accounting officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Charles HARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. Dr. JENKIN, Tommy Reddish, Louise Cason, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 98-8813 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 1, 1999. Appeal from the United States District Court for the S outhern District of Georgia. No. CV-698-11), William T. Moore, Judge. Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Section 1997e(a) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) provides that "[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § ] 1983 ..., or any other federal law, by a prisoner confined in any ... prison ... until such administrative re medies as are available are exhausted." 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). This provision applies in this case because the prisoner, the appellant, filed his complaint after the PLRA's effective date. Appellant is an inmate in the Georgia state pr ison system. He seeks both monetary and injunctive relief on the gr ound that appe llees, or one of them, violated his Eighth (and Fourteenth) Amendment right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment by refu sing him needed medical treatment. Because appellant seeks such relief, section 1997e(a) required that he exhaust his administrative remedies before bringing suit. Appellant has invoked the prison system's administrative process; he has done so by filing a grievance. His grievance has been denied, however, because it was untimely. Appellant could appeal such denial (within the prison system); he contends, how ever, that appeal would not be heard (because his grievance was untimely). Given this circumstance, his argument continues, he has exhausted his administrative remedies and, thus, the PLRA's exhaustion requirement. We disagree.

### 2 As the district court noted in disposing of this case, Georgia State Prison Inmate Grievance Procedure No. 503.1 allows the grievance coordinator to waiv e the time period for filing a grievance if "good cause" is shown. Since appellant has not sought leave to file an out-of-time grievance, he cannot be considered to have exhausted his administrative remedies. If we we re to accept appellant's position—that the filing of an untimely grievance exhausts an inmate's administra tive remedies—inmates, such as appellant, could ignore the PLRA's exhaustion requirement a nd still gain access to federal cour t merely by filing an untimely grievance. In sum, we affirm the district court's dismissal of appellant's complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.
AFFIRMED.
### SERVE D JUN E4 . 201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N "^^J nj . J•^r••^^r^rln ^

OFFIC EO FHEARING S ' '' ' ; ; .• : " '^ ' WASHINGTON , D C IN TH EMATTERO F FEDERA LEXPRES S CORPORATIO N FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10SW000 7 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-053 3

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designateda s Cas e No . 2009SW700276 ) ha s bee n assigne d t o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r

person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Ronni e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La w Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10SW000 7 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Courtne y E . Felts , Respondent' s Counse l Staf f Attorney , Federa l Express , Inc . 362 0 Hack s Cros s Roa d Buildin g B , 3' " Floo r Memphis , T N 38125-880 0 TEL : 901-434-863 2 FAX : 901-434-828 3 Elly n Ponton , Complainant' s Counse l Agenc y Attorney , Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l Southwes t

Region , ASW-7G 5 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 Meacha mBoulevar d Fort Worth , T X 76137-429 8 TEL : 817-222-508 9 FAX : 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the following address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the quarterly report on Form
10-Q, (the Report), of SunCom Wireless, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, Eric Haskell, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |                                |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------ |  | 
| |  | /s/ Eric Haskell               |  | 
| |  | Name: Eric Haskell             |  | 
| |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer |  | 
| |  | Date: May 14, 2007             |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report,
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
# Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month Spotlight: Rachel Nolan

/ Published April 29, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
*Editor’s Note: The Defense Logistics Agency recognizes April as Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. To honor the contributions of sexual assault response coordinators, DLA is highlighting those who work daily to support the agency’s global mission.*

**My name is:**Rachel Nolan

**I am:** A sexual assault response coordinator at DLA Distribution in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania.

**Describe Your Job in a Sentence:** I provide DLA Distribution employees information on sexual assault prevention, education and victim advocacy.

**How long have you worked at DLA?** I began working at DLA Distribution in July 2020.  

**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?** I’ve really enjoyed getting to know the employees at DLA. The pride people take in their work and the enthusiastic energy they display is infectious!

**How do you make a difference?** By providing sexual assault education and outreach to all DLA Distribution employees and support to those who have experienced sexual assault.

**Why is it important that we have a SAPR program?** The SAPR program is instrumental in helping to create a healthy environment that promotes dignity and respect for all employees through our prevention and education initiatives. Sexual assault is a crime as has no place within our DLA Distribution community.

**What do you want DLA employees to know about the SAPR program?** If a DLA employee has experienced sexual assault in the workplace, there is a team of qualified, trained sexual assault response coordinators that are available 24/7 via the SAPR Hotline: 800-841-0937.
| (i) | The                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year                ended                December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (ii) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                the                Company. |
|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                   |   |   |                                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  April 15,                  2008 |   | By:    | /s/                  Marc                  Potter                                                         |
|                                                        |   | Name:  | Marc                  Potter                                                                              |
|                                                        |   | Title: | Executive                  Vice                  President (Principal Executive                  Officer) |

----