alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(May 9, 2017)

#### In the Matter of Lisa Broad, Respondent, v New York City Board/Department of Education, Appellant.

[53 NYS3d 295]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered October 23, 2015, which granted the petition to set aside a determination of an arbitrator, dated October 29, 2014, sustaining numerous charges and specifications against petitioner and terminating her employment as a tenured teacher, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied, the determination of the arbitrator reinstated, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 75, dismissed.

The arbitrator’s decision had a rational basis and was supported by adequate evidence *(see e.g. Lackow v Department of Educ. [or “Board”] of City of N.Y.,*51 AD3d 563, 567 [1st Dept 2008]). The record shows that the arbitrator reasonably determined that petitioner’s performance as a teacher was deficient for two years based on the observations and ratings of the school principal and two assistant principals. Although some of the charges and specifications were not significant, the record reflects that petitioner was provided with substantial assistance over a two-year time period to improve her pedagogical skills, but she was unwilling to improve her performance.

The penalty of termination from employment does not shock our sense of fairness *(see e.g. Matter of Russo v New York City Dept. of Educ.,*25 NY3d 946 [2015]; *[Matter of Webb v City of New York,*140 AD3d 411 [1st Dept 2016]).

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





We have issued our report dated February 20, 2004, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Dynamics
Research Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of Dynamics Research Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No.
333-109973, File No. 333-59706, File No. 333-47838, File No. 333-02805 and File
No. 333-68548).




/s/ Grant Thornton
------------------------


Boston, Massachusetts
February 20, 2004
# Women’s History Month Spotlight: Laura Schreiber 

/ Published March 28, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Laura Schreiber has risen from Defense Logistics Agency intern to program manager using strategy, focus, education and hard work combined with DLA’s continuing education and career development opportunities. 

Schreiber leads DLA Research and Development’s Acquisition Modernization Technology Research program, created in 2021 to identify acquisition processes that could benefit from modernization and recommend research efforts. 

The former student intern launched her career in DLA Finance while attending Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia. Upon earning a bachelor’s degree in business management in 2010, she was offered a full-time position through the two-year Financial Accreditation and Skills Training Track Program. 

“When I decided to pursue my master’s in business administration, DLA offered tuition assistance and my supervisors were very flexible with my schedule,” Schreiber said. 

After earning her MBA from Virginia Tech in 2015, Schreiber continued taking advantage of DLA-supported management and certificate programs. She’s worked as a financial management advisor, management and program analyst, and now a program manager. 

                A Boston Marathon official attempts to remove Katherine Switzer from the race in 1967. File photo                            220328-D-D0441-001                            A Boston Marathon official attempts to remove Katherine Switzer from the race in 1967. File photo            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: CourtesyVIRIN: 220328-D-D0441-001As an avid runner and triathlete, Schreiber is inspired by Katherine Switzer, the first woman to register and run in the Boston Marathon in 1967. Switzer registered using her initials to keep race officials from knowing she was a woman. Officials tried physically removing her at the start of the race, but Switzer pressed on and completed the marathon.

“Like Switzer, I feel a sense of empowerment completing races and I can’t imagine my life without it. She is such a great role model,” Schreiber said.

For Schreiber, Women’s History Month is a time to reflect on the contributions women have made throughout the years. 

“There were several goals I wanted to independently accomplish prior to marriage, including earning my MBA and becoming a homeowner,” she said. “These may sound like small feats, but 70 years ago my grandmother didn’t have the luxury and resources available to accomplish them.”

Schreiber added that she couldn’t have imagined as a college intern how DLA would shape her life.  

“I’ve met so many wonderful people along the way and we have watched each other grow personally and professionally. This goes to show, for me, DLA is family,” she said.
# C_2013108EN.01003903.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/39

---

Action brought on 3 February 2013 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-10/13)

2013/C 108/93

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision rejecting a request for compensation made by the applicant on the basis of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations because of errors made when establishing her entitlements when she took up her duties and for the delay in rectifying those errors.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 28 March 2012 by which the Appointing Authority rejected the applicant’s request for compensation of 13 January 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 28 March 2012 by which the Appointing Authority rejected the applicant’s request for compensation of 13 January 2012;

| — | order the Commission to compensate the applicant in the amount of EUR 172 236,42; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to compensate the applicant in the amount of EUR 172 236,42;

| — | in the alternative, order the Commission to compensate the applicant in the amount of the sums overpaid, as from the day on which the irregularity was discovered but not corrected, or, in any event, at least in the amount of the sums overpaid from the month of November 2010, when the applicant’s multiplication factor alone was corrected; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, order the Commission to compensate the applicant in the amount of the sums overpaid, as from the day on which the irregularity was discovered but not corrected, or, in any event, at least in the amount of the sums overpaid from the month of November 2010, when the applicant’s multiplication factor alone was corrected;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
No. 10-253.

#### Kevin C. Umphreyville, Petitioner v. Charles W. Gittins.

562 U.S. 963, 131 S. Ct. 477,

178 L. Ed. 2d 291,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8100.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 366 Fed. Appx. 460.
No. 10-6702.

#### Ryan A. Brown, Petitioner v. Parking Authority of the City of Jersey City, et al.

562 U.S. 1070, 131 S. Ct. 659,

178 L. Ed. 2d 493,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9415.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, denied.
No. 10-5541.

#### Dennis Strickland, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 505,

178 L. Ed. 2d 408,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8355.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 601 F.3d 963.
No. 10-6359.

#### Orville Wynter, Petitioner v. New York.

562 U.S. 1032, 131 S. Ct. 572,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8723,

178 L. Ed. 2d 419,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New York, Nassau County, denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Karejaah Cornelius, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 894]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered February 29, 2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 17V2 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations, including its evaluation of alleged inconsistencies and the fact that some witnesses received benefits for their testimony.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Webber, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
No. 10-5740.

#### Vince Byers, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 936, 131 S. Ct. 341,

178 L. Ed. 2d 222,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7148.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 603 F.3d 503.
# Corpus Christi’s COSIS Team wins DLA Distribution Team of Quarter

/ Published Dec. 24, 2015
CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas, 
DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas, Stock Readiness Branch Care of Stock in Storage team has been named DLA Distribution Team of the Quarter for fourth quarter fiscal year 2015. 
The nine-member team is comprised of Gary Christmas, Martin Breth, Julie Crawford, Jose Hernandez, Rickey Morris, Rhonda Peterson, Valerie Sanchez-Pousson, Robert Steinocher, and Susan Stewart. 

The Stock Readiness COSIS team conducts care on materiel in stock to prevent degradation of material to a lower condition code until it can be refurbished at the local maintenance depot or reissued to the warfighter.  This applies to more than 12,500 line items across nearly 30,000 locations among six warehouses and five open storage lots belonging to the distribution center.  

According to the distribution center’s deputy commander Bob Rosarius, one of the team’s most significant recent accomplishments was the execution of a timely and efficient Stock Readiness inspection effort to clear approximately 5,000 special, visual and cyclic inspections.  Together, the team physically conducted the inspection and material validations of in-stock material to ensure the shelf-life and packaging requirements were within compliance.  

During this time, the team has integrated four new members and continues to produce superior results to contribute to the operational readiness of not only DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, but the entire DLA organization in support of the warfighter, said Rosarius. 

“Their collaborative teamwork, skill and diverse dynamic ensure the customer receives the highest quality work in a timely manner,” he concluded.
No. 10-6475.

#### Brian Rico Centeno, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 989, 131 S. Ct. 433,

178 L. Ed. 2d 336,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8250.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 566.
# Fueling the Pacific

/ Published Jan. 9, 2023
YOKOTA AIR BASE, Japan, 
Aircraft land at Yokota Air Base almost every day, serving as the busiest transportation hub in the Western Indo-Pacific and servicing aircraft from all over the world.

But aircraft can’t get here without help. An important part of getting planes to where they need to go, is fueling them up. The Fuels Distribution Center at Yokota Air Base helps refuel 5,300 different aircraft that operate at or transit through the installation.

The 374th Logistics Readiness Squadron fuels management flight is responsible for storing, testing, and distributing roughly 18 million gallons of fuel every year. With help from 74 employees, including Japanese nationals and service members, and 38 fleet vehicles, the job gets done.

“We are the busiest fuel hub here in Pacific Air Forces,” said Tech. Sgt. Patrick Boyle, 374th LRS fuels management flight NCOIC of fuels distribution. “If we stopped operations, aircraft wouldn’t be able to take off and we would basically be at a standstill.”

The fuels management flight, also known as petroleum, oils, and lubricants or POL, refuels planes from everywhere that arrive on base. From aircraft assigned to Yokota, to aircraft from other U.S. military bases or countries, some planes land here to stay, while others will land here to refuel and takeoff to their next destination.

The 36th Airlift Squadron participated in a New Year’s Jump exercise Jan. 8, supporting a multilateral group of more than 150 paratroopers during the event.  The fuels management team was vital to ensure the aircraft were prepared for the joint mission.

“What I do to prepare is review the flying schedule, see what’s coming in and if there’s an influx of aircraft, I move my Airmen around to what needs to be refueled,” Boyle said. “We are also sure to work with our lab which tests the fuel to guarantee that it is good to go.”

The fuels management lab tests fuel to make certain aircraft can be operated safely. They have a variety of equipment to conduct different tests such as determining how much dust or debris is in the fuel.

“We maintain all of the fuel and fuel dispensing equipment in our flight,” said Senior Airman Michael Sandor, 374th LRS fuels management flight fuels laboratory technician. “We test it, make sure it’s up to our standards, and if something wasn’t right, we would lock out the fuel so it won't be used.”

The fuels management team is tasked with supporting all sorts of different missions at Yokota and play a vital role in day-to-day operations toward the defense of Japan and the Indo-Pacific region. At the end of the day, the mission can’t be accomplished without fuel.

*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Yokota Air Base website.*
# C_2015346EN.01002301.xml

| 19.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — H&M Hennes & Mauritz v OHIM — Yves Saint Laurent (Handbags)

(Case T-525/13) (1)

1

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing handbags - Earlier design - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Obligation to state reasons))

(2015/C 346/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: H&M Hennes & Mauritz BV & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Hartwig and A. von Mühlendahl, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervener before the General Court: Yves Saint Laurent SAS (Paris, France) (represented by: N. Decker, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 July 2013 (Case R 207/2012-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between H&M Hennes & Mauritz BV & Co. KG and Yves Saint Laurent SAS.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders H&M Hennes & Mauritz BV & Co. KG to pay the costs, including those incurred by Yves Saint Laurent SAS in the course of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders H&M Hennes & Mauritz BV & Co. KG to pay the costs, including those incurred by Yves Saint Laurent SAS in the course of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 7.12.2013.

1

---
#### Com. v. Giannotto14

04/06/2016

930 MAL (2015)

14

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 484
No. 10-6593.

#### Luke Gatlin, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 534,

178 L. Ed. 2d 393,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8452.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 613 F.3d 374.
MAESTROS Y PADRES: 

Esa memoria USB podría ser un cigarrillo electrónico 

Los cigarrillos electrónicos 

son los productos de tabaco 

de uso más frecuente entre 

los estudiantes de escuela 

secundaria media y superior 

de los EE. UU. 

Algunos cigarrillos electrónicos no 

parecen productos de tabaco y por eso 

puede que no se note cuando los niños 

los usan en las escuelas, incluso en los 

salones de clases y en los baños. 

Hay un cigarrillo 

electrónico cada 

vez más popular, 

llamado JUUL, que 

tiene la forma de 

una memoria USB. 

Los JUUL suministran una dosis 

alta de nicotina. La nicotina es 

altamente adictiva y puede 

afectar el desarrollo del cerebro 

de los adolescentes. 

EL USO DE PRODUCTOS DE 

TABACO EN CUALQUIER 

FORMA, INCLUIDOS 

LOS CIGARRILLOS 

ELECTRÓNICOS, NO ES 

SEGURO PARA LOS 

JÓVENES. 

INFÓRMESE MÁS sobre los riesgos de los 

cigarrillos electrónicos para los jóvenes y 

obtenga consejos para hablar con ellos en 

https://e-cigarettes.surgeongeneral.gov/resources.html
No. 10-7223.

#### Donald Young, et ux., Petitioners v. Chris Di Ferrante.

562 U.S. 1107, 131 S. Ct. 849,

178 L. Ed. 2d 554,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9635.

December 13, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 3, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Companys chief financial officer certifies as follows:



(a) This Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



(b) The information contained in this Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/Eleanor J. WhitehurstSenior Vice President & Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 10, 2003




-29-
#### Tessa F. Bethune, Appellant, v Nassau University Medical Center (NUMC) et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[49 NYS3d 909]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), entered April 23, 2015, which granted the motion of the defendants Nassau University Medical Center (NUMC), Jacob E. Sperber, Mark Lerman, Mukesh Sharoha, “Nurse” Vilmer, and Melissa Boxer to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, inter alia, for failure to serve a notice of claim, and denied her cross motion, inter alia, for leave to serve a late notice of claim, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered May 28, 2015, which, upon the order entered April 23, 2015, is in favor of those defendants and against her dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Motion by the respondents, inter alia, to dismiss the appeal from the order entered April 23, 2015, on the ground that the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment entered May 28, 2015. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated January 19, 2016, the branch of the motion which was to dismiss the appeal from the order entered April 23, 2015, was held in abeyance and referred to the panel *799of Justices hearing the appeals for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the submission of the appeals, it is

Ordered that the branch of the motion which is to dismiss the appeal from the order entered April 23, 2015, is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered April 23, 2015, is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment entered May 28, 2015, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.

The appeal from the order entered April 23, 2015, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The action was properly dismissed insofar as asserted against the respondents on the ground that the plaintiff failed to serve a notice of claim (see Public Authorities Law § 3415 [1]; General Municipal Law § 50-e).

Further, the plaintiff failed to submit a proposed notice of claim in support of that branch of her cross motion which was for leave to serve a late notice of claim. General Municipal Law § 50-e (7) provides that “[w]here the application is for leave to serve a late notice of claim, it shall be accompanied by a copy of the proposed notice of claim.” Failure to comply with that provision is sufficient justification to deny that relief *(see Grasso v Nassau County,*109 AD3d 579 [2013]; *Matter of Farfan v City of New York,*101 AD3d 714, 715 [2012]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Leventhal, J.P., Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2598 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to allow members of the Armed 

Forces to use Department of Defense tuition assistance to pay for 

education or training at lower or lateral degree levels. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2019 

Mr. MARCHANT (for himself and Mr. CUELLAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to allow members 

of the Armed Forces to use Department of Defense 

tuition assistance to pay for education or training at 

lower or lateral degree levels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Developing Education 

5 by Leveraging Tuition Assistance Act’’ or the ‘‘DELTA 

6 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2598 IH

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF TUITION FOR OFF-DUTY TRAINING OR 

2 EDUCATION. 

3 Section 2007 of title 10, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as sub6 section (g); and 

7 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol8 lowing new subsection (f): 

9 ‘‘(f) A member of the armed forces may use assist10 ance provided under this section to pay for education or 

11 training at a degree level equal to, or lower than, a degree 

12 level previously attained by the member if— 

13 ‘‘(1) the education or training is relevant to the 

14 professional duties of the member; and 

15 ‘‘(2) the content of the education or training is 

16 not substantially similar to the content of other edu17 cation or training already received by the member.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS