alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Craig J. Cerny, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harrington West FinancialGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.Date: August 10, 2006                                                              /s/ Craig J.Cerny   Craig J. Cerny, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certificationof Principal Executive Officer**

**Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or15d-14(b)**

**of the Exchange Act**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAdvanstar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three and nine monthsended September 30, 2006  as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Joseph Loggia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.
| By:    | /s/ Joseph Loggia       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph Loggia           |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | Date: November 14, 2006 |

 

 

----
# Troop Support celebrates almost three centuries of service at retirement ceremony

/ Published Dec. 22, 2022
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support celebrated the careers of seven civilian employees during a retirement ceremony December 16.

DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Eric Shirley thanked the retirees and their family members for their combined 293 years of service to the country.

“You committed your entire working lives to the benefit and welfare of our service members,” Shirley said. “You have my personal appreciation and on behalf of the entire team at troop support, especially those that serve in uniform, you have our unwavering gratitude for your years of support.”

Shirley added that the organization is losing decades of know-how with the loss of the retirees.

“There are some great histories here with these individuals,” he said. “I would invite all of you, after the ceremony, to touch base with them. This is a great reference point for you all. The ethos of this organization, what makes troop support special is embodied right here. Learn a little about where they come from, what they’ve experienced and what their thoughts are for the future.”

Janine Samoni, who retired from the Subsistence supply chain after 39 years, paraphrased the sentiment of the retirees while speaking to the audience.

“I want to reiterate what everyone said about this being an amazing place to work. Thirty-nine years went by very quickly,” she said. “When we first started working in the 80s there were no computers, and then one shared computer for the office. Just the amount of innovation that has happened over forty years, I really hope continues at Troop Support and you continue to innovate and find even better ways to support the warfighters.”

The retirees were:
      - Richard K. Schoeniger, 44 years, Construction and Equipment
      - Sheila A. Clark, 44 years, Medical
      - Lenora P. Nash, 43 years, Medical
      - Gail Labrosciano, 42 years, Subsistence
      - Sheila Davis, 41 years, Construction and Equipment
      - Janine Samoni, 39 years, Subsistence
      - Theodoros Halkidis, 39 years, Medical

Each employee received a certificate of retirement, a DLA Troop Support memento, and a commander’s coin. In addition, spouses received a certificate of appreciation.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated March 24, 2006 on theconsolidated balance sheets of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its’ subsidiaries, Cobra Electronics Europe Limited and Cobra Electronics Hong Kong Limited, as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements ofearnings, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its’ subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on Form S-8 in the company’s previously filed Registration Statement Nos. 333-63501,333-42164, 333-42166 and 333-91078. 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 31, 2006
# Corpus Christi’s Alvarez named DLA Distribution Employee of the Quarter

/ Published Dec. 9, 2015
CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas, 
DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas, transportation agent Mary Frances Alvarez has been selected as one of DLA Distribution’s Employees of the Quarter for fourth quarter fiscal year 2015. ****

“Ms. Alvarez distinguished herself this quarter through diligence, an ever-present willing attitude to ensure customer support, leadership, and her initiative to take on additional tasks,” said supervisor Tracey Miles. 

As the transportation lead, Alvarez ensures that the daily responsibilities with the Transportation Office are effectively managed, and ensures that all processes are accomplished accurately and expeditiously. 

According to Miles, Alvarez is extremely dedicated to the mission. “Her priority is getting high priority shipments out to the field.  Ms. Alvarez’ experience and attention to detail are instrumental in support of the transportation mission.  She established a solid rapport and works closely with the Corpus Christi Army Depot on requests for next day delivery shipments.” 

Alvarez is also directly responsible for the Transportation Office processing nearly 14,000 off-base Material Release Orders in FY15 in support of CCAD and the warfighter.  “Ms. Alvarez’ ‘can-do’ attitude and jovial disposition are important assets in daily dealings with our CCAD customers, carrier representatives and many other customers,” said Miles. 

As the senior transportation agent, Alvarez ensures that updates to the distribution center’s main warehousing system, Distribution Standard System, are made to the transportation load and she diligently corrects all DSS materiel release order problems for the freight and small parcel areas. 

Also serving as lead transportation trainer, she provides training and mentoring to her co-workers in a vast array of tasks.  “Ms. Alvarez is the [leader] that her peers go to for help with problem solving and troubleshooting.  Supervisors and leads of other functional areas also seek out Ms. Alvarez’ expertise for technical advice regarding MROs and transportation processes,” said Miles. 

Miles concluded that “Ms. Alvarez is extremely dependable, and, along with her great attitude and dedication to the mission, she is instrumental in the success of the Transportation Office.”
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

February 25, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00673-CV

LARRY ROSWELL, Appellant

V.

CLEAVER-BROOKS SALES AND SERVICE, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 103711-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This interlocutory appeal was brought from an order granting a temporary 

injunction. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot because the 

temporary injunction expired on November 30, 2019. Appellant filed a response 

and appellee filed a reply. 

Appellant’s brief raises a single issue—whether the trial court abused its 

discretion by granting temporary injunctive relief. “The controversy underlying 
2

this appeal—whether the grant of the injunction was proper—has become moot.”

Brooks-Brown v. USAA Texas Lloyd’s Co., No. 03-15-00451-CV, 2015 WL 

7422986, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 17, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing 

National Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999) (when 

injunction becomes inoperative due to passage of time, issue of its validity 

becomes moot); Bertram v. Bistrup, No. 03–05–00333–CV, 2009 WL 1099249, at 

*7 (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 22, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op.) (concluding that appeal 

of injunction had become moot when challenged portion expired by its own 

terms)). See also Diaz v. Mem’l City Neurology, P.A., No. 14-94-00764-CV, 1995 

WL 302175, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 18, 1995, no writ)

(mem. op.) (dismissing appeal as moot because the temporary injunction at issue 

had expired on its own terms). 

Because there is no live controversy between the parties concerning the 

validity of the temporary injunction, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Wise and Zimmerer.
#### Darryls Rawls, Respondent, v David Simon et al., Appellants.

[66 NYS3d 126]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered on or about February 22, 2017, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Triable issues of fact exist in this action where plaintiff pedestrian was struck by defendants’ vehicle. The record shows that the parties disagree about where the accident occurred with plaintiff asserting that he emerged from the back of a bus, raising an issue as to whether defendant driver had an opportunity to see him prior to the collision, whereas defendant maintains that plaintiff stepped out from in front of the bus, giving him no time to react. Moreover, defendant testified that he was traveling between 25 and 27 miles per hour at the time of the impact, but given that the front of the bus, by his *419own testimony, was 2V2 car lengths from a red light, issues of fact exist as to whether defendant was traveling at an excessive speed, and whether he would have had time to react had he been traveling at a slower speed as he approached the light *(see e.g. Gelster v Jaoude,*81 AD3d 1297 [4th Dept 2011]; *compare DeJesus v Alba,*63 AD3d 460 [1st Dept 2009], *affd*14 NY3d 860 [2010]). Such conflicting versions of how the accident occurred raise credibility issues, and “[i]t is not the court’s function on a motion for summary judgment to assess credibility” *(Ferrante v American Lung Assn.,*90 NY2d 623, 631 [1997]).

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
# C_2014159EN.01002602.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/26

---

Order of the General Court of 19 March 2014 — Club Hotel Loutraki and Others v Commission

(Case T-57/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - State aid - Operation of video lottery terminals - Grant of an exclusive licence by the Hellenic Republic - Decision finding no State aid - Letter addressed to the complainants - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 159/36

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Club Hotel Loutraki AE (Loutraki, Greece); Vivere Entertainment AE (Athens, Greece); Theros International Gaming, Inc. (Patras, Greece); Elliniko Casino Kerkyras (Athens); Casino Rodos (Rhodes, Greece); and Porto Carras AE (Alimos, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Afonso and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.M. Mamouna, acting as Agent) and Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou AE (OPAP) (Athens) (represented initially by K. Fountoukakos-Kyriakakos, Solicitor, L. Van den Hende and M. Sánchez Rydelski, lawyers, and subsequently by M. Petite and A. Tomtsis, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 29 November 2012 relating to a complaint by the applicants concerning the existence of State aid allegedly granted by the Greek authorities to OPAP

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | Club Hotel Loutraki AE, Vivere Entertainment AE, Theros International Gaming, Inc., Elliniko Casino Kerkyras, Casino Rodos and Porto Carras AE shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou AE (OPAP). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Club Hotel Loutraki AE, Vivere Entertainment AE, Theros International Gaming, Inc., Elliniko Casino Kerkyras, Casino Rodos and Porto Carras AE shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Organismos Prognostikon Agonon Podosfairou AE (OPAP).

| 3. | The Hellenic Republic shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Hellenic Republic shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1629
TODD D. RICHEY, Petitioner, versus U.S. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Railroad Retirement Board. (No. 00-AP-0031, WCA- 00 0-00-1446) Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Todd D. Richey, Petitioner Pro Se. Catherine C. Cook, General Counsel, Karl Theodore Blank, III, Steven Alan Bartholow, Eric Todd Wooden, UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Chicago, Illinois, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Todd D. Richey seeks review of a Railroad Retirement Board decision affirming the Hearing Officer’s decision to dismiss his action seeking additional retirement benefits. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Richey v. United States R.R. Retirement Bd. , No. 00-AP-0031 (RRB Apr. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul M. Anderson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    PAUL M.
ANDERSON                                                          
|Paul M. Anderson Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer March 15, 2004
No. 10-6672.

#### Francisco Iniguez, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1069, 131 S. Ct. 657,

178 L. Ed. 2d 491,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9388.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fifth Appellate District, denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.40

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                    AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


      This Amendment No. 1 (this "Amendment") dated as of December 1, 2004, is
made by and between Vanguard Health Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and Keith B. Pitts (the "Executive").


      WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive executed a certain Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement (the "EA") dated as of September 23, 2004, to
secure the services of the Executive as Vice Chairman; and

      WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish the Executive's base salary
set forth in Section 6(a) of the EA to be increased to $623,150, effective as of
January 1, 2005.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants
herein contained, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the EA is
amended as follows:

      1. Defined Terms. Except for those terms defined above, the definitions of
      capitalized terms used in this Amendment are as provided in the EA.

      2. Amendment to Section 6(a). Section 6(a) of the EA entitled "Base
      Salary" is hereby deleted and replaced with the following new Section
      6(a):

            "(a). Base Salary. The Executive's base salary hereunder, from
            September 23, 2004 to December 31, 2004, shall be $605,000 per year,
            payable semi-monthly. Effective January 1, 2005, the Executive's
            base salary hereunder shall be $623,150 per year, payable
            semi-monthly. The Board shall review such base salary at least
            annually and make such adjustments from time to time as it may deem
            advisable, but the base salary shall not at any time be reduced from
            the base salary in effect from time to time."

      3. Ratification. All other provisions of the EA remain unchanged and are
      hereby ratified by the Company and the Executive.

<PAGE>

                                      - 2 -

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed
by its duly authorized officer and the Executive has executed this Amendment,
each as of the day and year first set forth above.

                                        VANGUARD HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

                                        By: /s/ Ronald P. Soltman
                                           ------------------------------------
                                                Ronald P. Soltman
                                                Executive Vice President

                                        EXECUTIVE:

                                        /s/ Keith B. Pitts
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Keith B. Pitts
2017-0755.

#### State v. Ammiyhuwd.

Butler App. No. CA2016-08-151. On emergency motion to stay. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., dissents.
No. 09-1285.

#### Ted L. Pappas, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1053, 131 S. Ct. 594,

178 L. Ed. 2d 452,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8881.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 592 F.3d 799.
# DLA Aviation leads bio-based synthetic oil testing for federal vehicles

/ Published April 27, 2016
Hazardous Minimization and Green Products Program