U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-KSB/A
                 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ITEMS 1, 6, 7, 9, 10 AND 13

                  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                   For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002

                         Commission File Number: 0-6088

                              Earth Sciences, Inc.
                              --------------------
                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)

             Colorado                               84-0503749
             --------                               ----------
     (State of incorporation)            (IRS Employer Identification No.)

           8100 SouthPark Way, Unit B, Littleton, Colorado 80120-4525
           ----------------------------------------------------------
          (Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)

      (Registrant's telephone number, including area code): (303) 734-1727

         Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
                        Common Stock, one cent par value
                        --------------------------------
                                (Title of class)

Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[X] Yes [ ] No

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ X ]

State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year.  $ 5,744,000

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held
by nonaffiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity
was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of a
specified date within the past 60 days. As of March 21, 2003 was $7,090,000.


Number of shares outstanding of registrant's Common Stock, one-cent par value as
of March 21, 2003 - 33,363,844.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
None


Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:  Yes __ No  X

<PAGE>

PART I

Item 1. Description of Business
-------------------------------
This Annual Report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933. In particular, such forward-looking
statements may be found in this section under "Description of Business," and
below in Item 6. under "Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
Operations ." Actual events or results could differ materially from those
discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors
including those set forth below or under the heading "Management's Discussion
and Analysis or Plan of Operations."

(a) Business Development.
-------------------------
Earth Sciences, Inc. ("ESI" or "Registrant", which term includes its
wholly-owned subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated) is an environmental
technology and specialty chemicals company helping electric utility companies
remain competitive while meeting environmental regulations. ESI was incorporated
under the name of Colorado Central Mines, Inc. in Colorado in 1957. The major
activities of the Company include the sale of flue gas conditioning ("FGC") and
other chemicals and technology for coal-fired boilers provided through ADA-ES,
Inc. ("ADA-ES"), a wholly-owned subsidiary; the ownership of a currently idled
chemical facility in Calgary, Alberta; and the maintenance of several mineral
resources and prospects in the Western US. In March 2003 ADA-ES and ESI entered
into an agreement for the pro rata distribution of all the common stock of
ADA-ES to the shareholders of ESI based on a record date to be set by the ESI
Board of Directors. The distribution will result in ADA-ES being a separate
company operated apart from ESI. The proposed spin-off is subject to a number of
contingencies and ESI reserves the right to revoke the proposed spin-off at any
time prior to the distribution date. There can be no assurances that the
proposed spin-off will actually occur.

In March 2003, ESI and ADA-ES entered into an agreement to provide for the
distribution of the ADA-ES stock to the shareholders of ESI. In an effort to
maximize stockholder value, the ESI Board of Directors has decided to separate
its significant operations into two separate businesses. Since ESI no longer
produces the chemicals needed for the ADA-ES proprietary environmental products,
there is no longer a necessary business connection between the two companies.
The separation will allow ESI to focus on its mineral exploration business,
while ADA-ES focuses on its environmental technology/specialty chemical
business. The result will be two independent public companies.

The separation of the two businesses will be accomplished through a spin-off of
ADA-ES, Inc. In the spin-off, 100% of the outstanding shares of ADA-ES common
stock held by ESI will be distributed to the ESI shareholders. As a result,
those shareholders will receive one share of ADA-ES common stock for every ten
shares of ESI common stock they hold on the close of business on the record date
for the spin-off. The ESI Board of Directors expects to set the record date in
the first half of April 2003. The proposed spin-off is subject to a number of
contingencies and ESI reserves the right to revoke the proposed spin-off at any
time prior to the distribution date. There can be no assurances that the
proposed spin-off will actually occur.

During 2002, ESI (1) through ADA-ES (a) increased its FGC business through
continued chemical sales and service on five full-time units and one temporary
unit at various utilities; (b) further demonstrated a new anti-slagging product
and entered a joint venture with Arch Coal, Inc. ("Arch") to co-market that
product; and (c) substantially increased its government research and development
contract work through existing contracts and a new contract for mercury removal
and development of new FGC products; (2) through Earth Sciences Extraction
Company ("ESEC") studied and pursued the use with others of the idle facility in
Calgary for a variety of potential activities; (3) through AD-ES entered an
agreement with Alstom Environmental Control Systems to jointly market mercury
emission control systems, and (4) maintained its position in several mineral
resources and prospects in the Western US.

<PAGE>

Thus far in 2003, ADA-ES is finalizing installation of a mercury emission
control system for long-term testing at the Southern Company's Gaston plant in
Alabama testing under a government contract awarded in the fall of 2002 and is
actively making preparations to participate in a new 5-year government contract
for installation and evaluation of mercury removal at another utility. Through
the co-marketing agreement with Arch, preparations are being made for a sixth
utility demonstration of its new anti-slagging chemical. These activities and
those in the preceding paragraph are described in the succeeding paragraphs of
this Item 1(a) and below in Item 1(b).

ADA-ES currently has five operating FGC units at coal-fired utilities in Iowa,
Louisiana, Oregon, Wisconsin and Alabama. Revenues from sales of equipment and
chemicals to FGC customers in 2002 totaled $2,660,000. Assuming the continuation
of the historical levels of FGC chemical purchases by its existing customers,
ADA-ES expects to recognize revenues of approximately $2.2 million in 2003 from
sales to those customers. In addition, ADA-ES expects to add two more FGC
customers in 2003. There can be no assurances that either of those expectations
will be met.

Early in 2000, ADA-ES received the signed Department of Energy ("DOE") contract
awarded to develop a broader spectrum of FGC chemicals (the "DOE FGC Contract")
and commenced research activities thereunder. In the fall of 2000, ADA-ES
received the award of an additional DOE cooperative agreement to test mercury
control technology (the "DOE Mercury Contract") totaling up to $6.8 million over
the life of the contract, which amount includes industry cost-share, and
commenced research activities thereunder. In the fall of 2002 ADA-ES received
the award of a further DOE cooperative agreement for the long-term test of
mercury control technology totaling $2.4 million, which amount includes industry
cost share, and commenced activities thereunder. Revenues recognized in 2002
from these government contracts totaled $2.65 million. ADA-ES retains the right
to commercialize any products developed under the activities of these contracts.
Assuming continued funding, ADA-ES expects to recognize revenues of
approximately $1.5 million from these contracts in 2003. Although continued
funding under the awarded contracts is considered highly probable, there can be
no assurances that the government will continue to approve such funding in its
future budgets. Full-scale testing was completed in 2002 at two further utility
sites under the DOE Mercury Contract with encouraging results.

In July 2001, ADA-ES entered an agreement with Arch, the second largest U.S.
coal producer, to jointly market ADA-249 to cyclone-fired power plants. The
agreement was modified and restated as of January 1, 2002. ADA-249 has been
demonstrated to improve the combustion performance of cost-efficient, low-sulfur
coals from the Powder River Basin (PRB) in cyclone boilers. When added prior to
combustion, this patent-pending product increases PRB coal's burning efficiency,
allowing it to perform more like bituminous coal. Utility companies using
ADA-249 may thus realize significant savings from reduced fuel costs, enhanced
operational flexibility and improved marketability of combustion byproducts.
Continuous feeding at one small unit and demonstrations at four utilities took
place during 2002 with positive results.

Earth Sciences Extraction Company's ("ESEC"), a wholly owned Canadian limited
partnership of ESI, solvent extraction facility in Calgary, Alberta remained
idle during 2002. ESEC has entered one sublease agreement for a portion of the
facility, executed a letter of intent for use of a portion of the site and is in
discussions with other parties on further sublease arrangements. ESEC has
initiated steps to sell major pieces of equipment that would not have general
use in the planned subleasing activity. The net proceeds from such planned sales
will be used to reduce the indebtedness secured by those assets. There can be no
assurances that Registrant will be able to able to successfully arrange sublease
agreements on the majority of the facility and site.

<PAGE>

ESI did not plan nor did it conduct any significant mineral exploration or
development activities in 2002. During 2002, ESI took steps to divest itself of
all its interests in Venezuela except for filings for gold and diamond
concessions in the southeast part of that country. ESI is developing plans for
limited mineral exploration or development activities in 2003 dependent upon
completion of the spin-off of ADA-ES, and also intends to maintain the mineral
interests in alunite, phosphate, and vanadium it currently holds.

If the Company should abandon, dispose or otherwise cease operations in Canada,
the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment recorded as a contra
equity amount will be recorded as an operating expense.

(b) Business of Issuer.
-----------------------
Registrant is an environmental technology and specialty chemicals company.
Registrant owns a 100% interest in ADA-ES which provides air pollution control
technologies, chemicals and services; a currently idled processing facility in
Calgary, Alberta, Canada; alunite properties which contain alumina, sulfur and
potash; and other mineral properties and prospects. Upon the planned spin-off of
the ADA-ES stock as noted above, the Company will no longer be involved in the
environmental technology/specialty chemical business, and intends to focus its
resources in furthering its mineral exploration activities and alternative uses
for the currently idle Calgary plant. The proposed spin-off is subject to a
number of contingencies and ESI reserves the right to revoke the proposed
spin-off at any time prior to the distribution date. There can be no assurances
that the proposed spin-off will actually occur.

ADA-ES Environmental Solutions
------------------------------
In 1997, ESI acquired a majority equity position in ADA-ES through a combination
of stock and cash. The acquisition agreement provided for payments of cash and
notes and included an option for ESI to acquire the remaining equity interests
(49%). In May 1998, ESI exercised such option, acquiring a 100% interest by
issuance of 1,716,000 shares of stock.

Market for ADA-ES Products and Services
---------------------------------------
The primary drivers for many of ADA-ES services are new environmental
regulations and the deregulation of the utility industry. Environmental
regulations, such as the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, are requiring utilities
to reduce emission of pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide,
and toxic particles. In addition to environmental regulations, the coal burning
electric power generation industry is also impacted by the ongoing deregulation
of the utility business. Historically, public utilities have been able to pass
capital and operating costs onto customers through rate adjustments. However
with deregulation, utility companies face competitive challenges requiring them
to better control capital spending and operating costs. These changes increase
the need for cost-effective retrofit technologies that can be used to enhance
existing plant equipment to meet the more stringent emission limits while
burning less expensive coals. ADA-ES has entered this market with its
proprietary non-toxic chemical conditioner that offers both technical and
economic advantages over the hazardous chemicals that have been in use.


The Environmental Protection Agency and numerous state regulatory bodies are
developing regulations that are expected to require large mercury reductions at
the nation's 1,100-plus coal units by 2007. Early DOE studies indicate that the
cost to control these emissions will be $2-$5 billion annually. ADA-ES is
positioning itself to be a key supplier of services to the market that is
anticipated to be established by these regulations. The markets that will be
affected by new regulations are the same ones that it currently operate within.
In addition, the systems and products that are required for mercury controls fit
well with the existing ADA-ES products and capabilities.

<PAGE>

ADA-ES' Technology and Services - FGC
-------------------------------------
ADA-ES has developed a technology for conditioning flue gas streams from
combustion sources that allows existing air pollution control devices to operate
more efficiently. Through various suppliers and contractors, it may manufacture
engineered units for each individual application. The units mix, pump and
monitor the feed of proprietary chemical blends. The chemical blends are applied
to the flue gas streams by a pressurized system of specially designed lances and
nozzles. Such treatment of the flue gas stream alters the physical properties of
the fly ash particles contained therein primarily by decreasing particle
resistivity. This alteration allows the existing electrostatic precipitator
("ESP") to more effectively collect such fly ash particles that would otherwise
escape into the atmosphere. ADA-ES' technology also has application in the
cement and petroleum refining industries where particulate emissions are being
or need to be controlled. The non-utility markets are not being aggressively
pursued since the profit margin potential for such customers is considered to be
less since chemical usage is lower.

ADA-249
-------
In 2000, ADA-ES introduced a new specialty chemical, ADA-249, a product designed
to save utility companies with cyclone furnaces significant costs each year
through reduced fuel costs, enhanced operational flexibility and improved
marketability of combustion by-products. Cyclone furnaces were designed as an
efficient, compact way to burn high-ash, high-sulfur coals to produce steam for
power generation. The coals for which these units were designed typically
produce a thick molten slag layer on the walls of each cyclone barrel. The slag
coating catches the incoming coal and holds it until combustion is completed.
When switching to Powder River Basin ("PRB") coal, however, the slag layer is
usually too thin and watery to capture the coal, so the coal must burn in
flight. Even though PRB coal burns faster than bituminous coal, there is just
not enough time for combustion to be completed within the main furnace firebox.
The result is usually unacceptable amounts of unburned carbon in the flyash as
well as increased ash deposition, increased air emissions, and an unfavorable
unit heat rate.

Another problem with PRB coal slag in a cyclone furnace is that it solidifies
(freezes) abruptly during low-load operation when the cyclone temperature drops.
Since these boilers rely on keeping the slag molten all the way to the slag tap
(a drain on the furnace floor) in order to operate, the freezing problem can
cause unplanned shutdowns and lost revenues. In order to keep the PRB coal slag
molten, these units must be operated at high loads even during periods of low
demand, which adversely affects power revenues. Finally, bottom ash is a more
valuable commodity for sale to ash brokers than flyash. Many cyclone boilers
that have converted to PRB coal have lost significant revenues from ash sales
compared to the old days of burning high-ash coals.

ADA-249 is a patented product designed to modify slag viscosity. ADA-249 is a
blend of iron oxides, mineralizers, and flow enhancers, that is added to the PRB
coal prior to combustion in order to create the proper slag layer for combustion
within the cyclone barrel. In application at the utility, ADA-249 is conveyed
mechanically from a supply delivered via dump truck to a hopper. From there
ADA-249 is fed by screw and belt conveyors to the coal feeders. The addition of
ADA-249 to the coal results in more coal burning in the cyclone, less carbon in
the flyash, better precipitator performance, reliable slag tapping, and more
bottom ash to sell. ADA-ES designs and sells the delivery system and the
continuing supply of chemical.

In May 2001, we entered an agreement with Arch Coal Inc., the second largest
U.S. coal producer, to jointly market ADA-249 to cyclone-fired power plants. The
agreement was modified and restated as of January 1, 2002. Pursuant to the
agreement, the Company has granted a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to
the joint venture to use ADA 249 in connection with the JV activities. The JV is
controlled by a five member management committee, three of whose members are
selected by Arch and the remaining members by the Company. The JV will pay the
Company a discount from the commercial price for all ADA 249 material supplied
and commercial rates for any technical services. The Company and Arch each will
bear their own costs and expenses related to any ADA 249 marketing efforts. Arch
will fund the JV activities, including equipment needs and will retain any net
profits. Either party may terminate the JV upon 60-days written notice after
non-approval of the annually required business plan.

<PAGE>

ADA-ES and Arch anticipate providing to their customers a long-term package of
PRB coal, the ADA-249 chemical and, if needed, the required injection equipment.
This package is intended to enable boiler operators to achieve the benefits of
the ADA-249 fuel additive without making a significant capital investment. The
companies will also handle the logistics of supply and system maintenance.
During 2002, in addition to continual sales to one customer, (the revenues from
whom amounted to less than 10% of the Company's total revenues), ADA-249 was
demonstrated at four sites, for which we are in various stages of negotiation to
supply ADA 249 on a continual basis. The DOE does not participate with the
Company in any of its activities related to ADA 249.

Government Contracts
--------------------
The DOE issues solicitations from time to time for various development and
demonstration projects. The DOE solicitations range in subject matter, and the
Company submits bids for topics that fit the Company's mission and strategic
plan. The bids involve a proposed statement of work, and contracts are
negotiated with successful bidders to perform the specified work.

The contracts with the DOE are known as Cooperative Agreements and are
considered financial assistance awards. The Company currently has three such
agreements. Generally, the agreements cover the development and/or demonstration
of air pollution control technologies for coal-fired power generating plants.
One agreement provides for the development of a technology to reduce the
emission of particulate matter from power plants. The second and third
agreements cover the testing of mercury control systems at power plants. The
work may involve designing and fabricating equipment, installing the equipment
at power plants, testing the equipment, preparing economic studies, and
preparing various reports. The deliverables required by the agreements include
various technical and financial reports that are submitted by the Company on a
prescribed schedule. The agreements require that the negotiated scope of work be
performed, which includes testing/demonstrating various air pollution control
technologies. The agreements with the DOE provide that any intellectual property
that results from the work become the property of the Company.

DOE FGC Contract
----------------
In September 1999, ADA-ES was awarded a $1 million DOE contract to develop an
expanded line of flue gas conditioning agents. This project was initiated in
January 2000 with an objective of developing a new family of flue gas
conditioning products. These products are targeted for use at coal-fired power
stations that are equipped with older and smaller cold-side electrostatic
precipitators. Efforts during the first year helped to establish laboratory
methodologies for evaluating trial formulations of chemical additives, preparing
and evaluating trial quantities of additives, and beginning full-scale field
trials of the most promising formulations. Three of the best performing
conditioning agents were tested at full scale at the City of Ames power plant,
and one showed improved performance when compared to the product currently being
used at the plant. Refinements were made to the conditioning agents during 2001
and field trials began late in the year at a PacifiCorp plant. The testing at
PacifiCorp was successfully completed during 2002 showing opacity reductions. In
addition, no detrimental impacts on ash quality were observed. A final test
series was begun later in the year at the AEP Conesville Plant. Initial results
showed positive performance of the product in terms of opacity reductions. We
anticipate testing will continue through early 2003 when work on the DOE
contract will wrap up. Commercial flue gas conditioning products may result from
this work that will serve a new market segment of power plants for ADA-ES. Under
terms of the cooperative agreement with the Department of Energy, ADA-ES will
own the proprietary rights to any commercial products that are developed as a
result of this work.

DOE Mercury Contract
--------------------
ADA-ES began work on a Cooperative Agreement with the Department of Energy in
October, 2000 to demonstrate full-scale mercury control systems at coal-fired
power plants. During the three-year, $6.8 million project, integrated control
systems are being installed and tested at four power plants. The mercury control
system involves injecting powdered activated carbon (PAC) into the power plant
flue gas where it ties up the mercury. The existing particle control equipment
at the power plant then collects the PAC. ADA-ES is responsible for managing the
project including engineering, testing, economic analysis, and information
dissemination functions. Power generating companies that have entered into
contracts with ADA-ES are Alabama Power Company, We Energies, and PG&E National
Energy Group. During 2001 ADA-ES completed demonstration tests at two of the
plants, and the remaining two plants were tested during 2002. The first test
site was Alabama Power's Gaston plant, which uses fabric filters to reduce
particulate matter emissions. Tests using PAC at this site showed that 80-85
percent of the mercury was removed, with as much as 90 percent being removed at
the highest performing periods during two weeks of testing. The We Energies
Pleasant Prairie Power Plant was the second site to be tested. This site is
equipped with electrostatic precipitators for particle collection.
Mercury-removal rates at this site using PAC ranged from 40 to 60 percent, with
short-term peak removal rates being 60-70 percent. Testing at the PG&E Brayton
Point Station showed that mercury removals of 90 percent could be achieved using
PAC. Test data from Salem Harbor were still being evaluated at the end of 2002
and were not available for release. The Cooperative Agreement with DOE is
scheduled to be completed late in 2003.

<PAGE>

DOE Long-Term Test of Mercury Controls
--------------------------------------
ADA-ES was awarded a $2.4 million contract from the Department of Energy in
September 2002 to install a mercury control system and evaluate its operation
over an extended period of time. The project will take place at Alabama Power
Company's Plant Gaston where PAC will be injected into the flue gas stream
between an existing electrostatic precipitator and COHPAC baghouse. A limited
test of this configuration was performed under the DOE project described above
with good results. The extended test will mature the technology and provide
information that is needed to assure reliable long-term continuous operation in
these systems. Work on the project in 2002 involved engineering and procurement.
Installation and testing is expected to commence in early 2003.

CCPI Program at We Energies
---------------------------
ADA-ES has been selected to provide mercury control technology and services for
a major project at the We Energies Presque Isle Power Plant. The U.S. Department
of Energy announced in January 2003 that it will award a grant to We Energies,
located in Milwaukee, Wis., to demonstrate an integrated mercury and particulate
matter emissions control system on three generating units at the facility
located in Marquette, Mich.

The demonstration project, named TOXECON, will also investigate the capabilities
of the proposed system to control sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions.
The primary attribute of TOXECON, an Electric Power Research Institute patented
process, is that it potentially represents the best option for control of
greater than 80 percent of mercury from coal-fired plants. TOXECON may also
prove to be the primary mercury control choice for western coals, and the only
choice for units with hot-side electrostatic precipitators.

TOXECON will make use of only one "baghouse," or emissions collection structure,
for three small boilers, increasing the cost-effectiveness of the integrated
system. TOXECON would also allow for separate treatment or disposal of the ash
collected in the primary particulate control device, and would be applicable to
a significant number of existing coal-fired plants in the U.S.

Specific objectives of the project are to achieve at least 90 percent mercury
removal; determine viability of sorbent injection for up to 70 percent sulfur
dioxide control; minimize waste disposal with a target of 100 percent
utilization; and recover at least 90 percent of the mercury captured in the ash.
DOE will provide $25 million of the project's $50 million total cost. We
Energies will host the project as well as serve as the prime contractor with the
DOE. ADA-ES will provide on-site engineering support, mercury control and
measurement technologies, and project management services under a $10 million
contract with We Energies. Cummins & Barnard and Environmental Elements Corp.
will provide design, construction, hardware and technical resources to the
project.

Work under the contract will cover five phases over a five-year period, with
phase one to be completed in the first quarter of 2003. As a result of the
project, it's expected that (i) there will be a significant reduction in the
rate of air emissions from the Presque Isle units and (ii) mercury control
retrofit technologies and emissions control improvements will be significantly
advanced throughout the U.S.

COMMERCIAL MERCURY EMISSIONS CONTROL
------------------------------------
In December 2002 we entered into an exclusive relationship with ALSTOM
Environmental Control Systems ("Alstom"), the largest supplier of equipment to
power plants in North America, to market systems for mercury removal from power
plants and other facilities. In response to pending State and Federal
legislation for mercury emission control, Alstom and ADA-ES intend to provide
overall turnkey solutions for mercury control including guaranteed performance.
Such solutions may include all equipment required including carbon storage and
injection equipment, particulate collection equipment or
redesign/rebuild/conversion of existing equipment, monitoring equipment, and
even guaranteed supply of powdered activated carbon (PAC).

<PAGE>

The partnership will focus on providing the required equipment and modifications
to achieve up to 90% removal of mercury meeting all applicable standards. The
partnership will combine our leading technology position in PAC based mercury
removal, acquired through our years of development including the DOE sponsored
projects, with Alstom's technology in particulate collection (Electrostatic
Precipitators and Fabric Filters) and Alstom's experience in mercury removal in
the waste to energy business.

Other Consulting Services
-------------------------
ADA-ES also offers consulting services to assist utilities in planning and
implementing strategies to meet new government emission standards requiring
reductions in both sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. ADA-ES is also
developing and testing new chemical blends expected to aid coal-burning
utilities in the variety of problems that may be encountered in switching to
lower cost coals.

Competition
-----------
Our primary competition is the conventional FGC technology using either sulfur
trioxide or a combination of sulfur trioxide and ammonia. This technology has
been available commercially since the 1970's and is offered by Chemithon
Engineers Ltd., Wahlco, Inc. and Benetech in a variety of forms. Conditioning of
fly ash by injecting small amounts of sulfur trioxide into the flue gas is a
well-proven technique for improving performance of the ESP. Such sulfur trioxide
conditioning loses its effectiveness in application with temperatures over 350
degrees F. The capital costs of conventional FGC technology are in excess of $1
million. Injection of water mist into the flue gas stream is also a known
technique for improving performance of the ESP in certain applications and is
offered by EnviroCare, Inc. The capital cost of a water injection system are
typically $200-300,000. A typical ADA-ES system can cost between
$300,000-600,000. The Company has also introduced a product shown to be
effective in the 300-750 degree range that is suitable for intermittent
application and can augment a sulfur trioxide system and help to avoid use of
ammonia. The competitive advantages of our FGC technology include an effective
temperature range of 300 degrees F to 900 degrees F; a simple injection system;
a non-toxic conditioner that will not become a secondary pollutant; and
chemicals that are safer and easier to handle on site. The variety of products
in the industry to aid ESP performance primarily compete on the basis of
performance and price. The Company usually arranges for a full-scale
demonstration of its products to its potential customers prior to selling its
systems and chemicals for use on a continual basis.

There are no major barriers to entry of our products in the market, however,
utility companies are generally slow to embrace new technologies when they
perceive any potential for disruption in the production of electricity. The
market for ADA-249 is just starting to emerge and no significant competition yet
exists. The market for mercury emission control of coal-fired utilities is
considered an emerging industry driven by regulations that are expected to be
promulgated by the U.S. EPA, state legislatures and/ or the U.S. Congress.

Patents
-------
We have received five patents related to different aspects of our technology.
The Company's patents have terms of 20 years measured from the application date,
the earliest of which was in 1995. The patent related to ADA 249 has been
approved for issuance and the related fee has been paid. We expect issuance of
that patent in the next few months. The application for the ADA 249 patent was
applied for in 2000. We continue to improve our products, and patents for three
additional products have been submitted. Although important to protect our
continuing business, we do not consider any of such patents to be critical to
the ongoing conduct of our business.

Supply of Chemical for Our Customers
------------------------------------
We typically negotiate blending contracts that include secrecy agreements with
chemical suppliers located near major customers. These arrangements minimize
transportation costs while assuring continuous supply of ADA-ES proprietary
chemical blends. Such arrangements have been in place since the spring of 1999
and are generally renewed on an annual basis.

In 2001 Earth Sciences, ADA-ES and NORIT Americas Inc. ("NORIT") entered into a
Market Development Agreement to jointly pursue the market for equipment and
sorbents to remove mercury from coal-fired boilers. Earth Sciences has assigned
all of its rights under that agreement to ADA-ES as part of the distribution
agreement with the consent of Norit all contingent on the spin-off. The
agreement joins ADA-ES with NORIT the country's leading supplier of powdered
activated carbon.

The goal of the agreement is to jointly develop mercury control sorbents
designed to maximize removal efficiency and minimize costs. NORIT provides PAC
and dosing systems for removing mercury from flue gas generated from the
combustion of municipal and medical solid waste and hazardous waste. The
agreement provides a long-term means for both us and NORIT to benefit from
potential sales of equipment and to participate in the development of sorbents
for this emerging mercury control market.

<PAGE>

CALGARY FACILITY
----------------
ESEC's facility in Calgary, Alberta, recovered uranium from phosphoric acid
during the period from 1983 through 1987. Uranium oxide production was suspended
in the fall of 1987 when the adjacent fertilizer plant from which the facility
received its feedstock suspended operations. The contract under which the
uranium was sold was modified in 1990 to allow unrestricted alternative use of
the facility. Revamp of the facility to allow production of purified phosphate
products was completed in 1997. The Calgary facility routinely produced
technical grade phosphoric acid through August 1999 when operations were
suspended for lack of sufficient working capital. Efforts to re-start the
facility for such operations have been frustrated by a general economic
slowdown. Management is seeking sublease arrangements for other activities at
the plant and is in the process of selling equipment that does not have general
use. Proceeds from those sales will be used to reduce indebtedness secured by
the plant in Calgary. There can be no assurances that subleases can be arranged
for the Calgary facility.

Mineral Exploration Activities
------------------------------
During 2002 Registrant did not plan nor did it conduct any significant
exploration or development activities, but maintained its ownership position in
the several mineral interests it holds. The mineral interests maintained by
Registrant include significant resource interests in alumina, gold, vanadium,
potash and sulfur, and prospects for copper/molybdenum and silver (see Item 2
below). Limited exploration or development activities are planned in 2003
dependent upon completion of the spin-off of ADA-ES noted above.

RAW MATERIALS.
ADA-ES purchases equipment from a variety of vendors for the engineered units it
manufactures. Such equipment is available from numerous sources. ADA-ES
purchases it proprietary chemicals through negotiated blending contracts with
chemical suppliers generally located near each major customer. The chemicals
used are readily available, and several such chemical suppliers can perform to
ADA-ES' requirements.

PATENTS, LICENSES AND FRANCHISES.
(See also the discussion above under the heading "ADA-ES Patents.") Registrant
holds no patents, licenses, franchises or land contracts that it considers
material in light of its other assets.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS ARE INCREASING AND COSTLY.
Insofar as ESI may engage in any significant mineral exploration and development
activities, compliance with environmental quality requirements and reclamation
laws imposed by federal, state, provincial, and local governmental authorities
may require significant capital outlays, may materially affect the economics of
a given property, or may cause material changes or delays in any future
activities. In addition to the imposition of requirements which may impact
operations, a number of these environmental laws and regulations impose
permitting requirements related both to the initiation of certain mining
activities as well as to the ongoing operation once mining commences. Local
regulations in the U.S. typically are land use related rather than
environmental. Although environmental regulatory costs to date and those
expected in 2003 are not significant, they may become substantial in the future.
Such costs are considered a part of the ordinary costs of our business. ESI
currently has no significant activities planned on its mineral properties or
prospects in 2003. Such plans are dependent on completion of the spin-off noted
above and availability of cash flow from subleasing activities at ESEC.

SEASONALITY OF ACTIVITIES.
The sale of FGC chemicals is dependent on the operations of the utilities to
which such chemicals are provided. Our FGC customers routinely schedule
maintenance outages in the spring of each year. During the period of such
outages, which may range from two weeks to over a month, no FGC chemicals are
used and purchases from us are correspondingly reduced.

<PAGE>

DEPENDENCE ON MAJOR CUSTOMERS.
In 2002 we supplied chemical, equipment and services to 5 FGC customers. We
recognized 13% of our revenue from MidAmerican Energy Co. in Iowa, 14% from
Alabama Power Company in Alabama, and 10% from Cleco Utility Group, Inc. in
Louisiana. ADA-ES' own sales staff markets our technology through trade shows,
mailings and direct contact with potential customers. During 2002 we recognized
46% of our revenue from services provided under contracts to the U.S. government
as discussed above in item 1(b). (See also Notes 3 and 8 to the Financial
Statement included elsewhere in this report).

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES.
The Company spent approximately $93,000 and $102,000 on research and development
activities related to further development of ADA-ES technology during 2002 and
2001, respectively.

EMPLOYEES.
As of December 31, 2002 the Company employed a total of 16 full-time personnel.
Included in this number are 15 people employed at our offices in Littleton,
Colorado and 1 in Alabama. In addition, other personnel were employed on a
contract basis for specific project tasks.

<PAGE>

Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This Annual Report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 that involve risks and uncertainties.
In particular such forward-looking statements may be found in this section and
under the heading "Description of Business." The following discussion and
analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. Words or phrases such
as "will," "hope," "expect," "intend," "plan" or similar expressions are
generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Those statements
involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from the results discussed herein. The principal risks and
uncertainties that may affect the Company's actual performance and results of
operations include the following: general economic conditions; adverse weather;
changes in federal income tax laws and federal funding for environmental
technology/specialty chemicals programs; governmental regulation; changes in
governmental and public policy; changes in economic conditions specific to one
or more of the Company's markets and businesses; competition; availability of
raw materials; and unexpected operations difficulties. Other risks and
uncertainties may also affect the outcome of the Company's actual performance
and results of operations. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements made in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

In March 2003 ADA-ES and ESI entered into an agreement (the Distribution
Agreement) for the pro rata distribution of all the common stock of ADA-ES to
the shareholders of ESI based on a record date to be determined by the ESI Board
of Directors. The Distribution Agreement requires certain allocations of cash
and liabilities among ESI and ADA-ES prior to the distribution of the ADA-ES
common stock. The spin-off is subject to a number of contingencies and ESI
reserves the right to revoke the proposed spin-off at any time prior to the
distribution date. There can be no assurances that the proposed spin-off will
actually occur.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
-------------------------------
The Company had a positive working capital of $277,000 at 12/31/02. The amount
represents an increase of $166,000 during the year. In the event that the
spin-off of ADA-ES occurs as planned, the working capital of the Company as of
12/31/02 on a pro forma basis would have been a deficit of $114,000. In either
case Management believes that existing and expected improving working capital
through continued and improved cash flow from ongoing operations, will be
sufficient to meet the anticipated needs of the Company in 2003. However, there
can be no assurances that the positive cash flow that has been achieved will
continue.

The Company's principal source of liquidity is its operating cash flows as
supplemented by its line-of-credit noted above. The continuation of positive
cash flow is dependent upon the continuation of chemical sales and operations of
the flue gas conditioning (FGC) units currently in-place in Wisconsin,
Louisiana, Iowa and Alabama, each of which provide an average monthly cash flow
of approximately $20,000. Unsatisfactory results, which could be caused by a
combination or single factor such as changes in coal, mechanical difficulties
(whether in the FGC unit or otherwise), and/or overall cost/benefit analysis, at
any of those units may decrease or end the sale of chemicals for such units. The
Company is also performing services under four DOE contracts, which overall are
expected to produce an estimated $3.1 million in revenues in 2003. Of that
amount approximately 18% represents cost share amounts from industry partners,
and 37% represents reimbursement from DOE for costs that pass through the
Company. Currently funding has been approved by the DOE for approximately $1.3
million of its share of those contracts. If further funding were not approved,
the Company would decrease or cease activities on those contracts and would
expect to maintain a positive cash flow but at a reduced level.

For ESI, if the spin-off occurs as planned, it will be seeking partnering and
joint venture relationships to conduct and expand operations and in order to
meet its funding requirements. For ADA, there can be no assurances that the
positive cash flow that has been achieved will continue. For ESI, there can be
no assurances that partnering and joint venture relationships can be arranged to
continue and expand its operations, and to meet its funding requirements.

The Company also has a $350,000 line-of-credit arrangement with a bank to help
with its working capital needs. No amounts were outstanding under the line as of
12/31/02.

<PAGE>

Planned capital expenditures for ADA-ES to sustain and improve ongoing
operations for 2003 are estimated at $200,000. The Company expects to fund these
requirements out of existing working capital. ESI expenditures for mineral
exploration activities in 2003 are dependent on cash flow from subleasing
activities or other partnering activities. There can be no assurance that cash
flow from subleasing or partnering activities will provide sufficient funds to
pursue meaningful mineral exploration activities.

Cash flow provided from operations totaled $58,000 for 2002 compared to
$592,000 for 2001. Cash flow from operations in 2001 was higher and 2002 was
lower than anticipated as the result of significant payments received at the end
of 2001 by one utility in advance of equipment installation and operation. The
amount for 2002 resulted primarily from the operating income plus non-cash
charges for depreciation and amortization and changes in other assets and
liabilities. Cash flow from investing activities for 2002 includes a use for
capital expenditures of $81,000. Cash flow from financing activities in 2002
consisted of payments on notes payable and long-term debt of $190,000. Cash flow
provided from operations in 2001 resulted primarily from the operating loss less
non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization. Cash flow from investing
activities for 2001 includes a use for capital expenditures of $131,000. Cash
flow from financing activities in 2001 consisted of payments on note payable
long-term liabilities of $151,000 and proceeds from the exercise of stock
options of $33,000.

Results of Operations
---------------------
Revenues totaled $5,744,000 in 2002 versus $5,571,000 in 2001. Revenues for 2002
increased $173,000 due to increased sales in both FGC chemical and services and
government contracts of $99,000 and $74,000, respectively. Revenues related to
FGC activities were positively impacted by the sale of equipment and chemical to
a new Alabama user, which amounts were offset by the end of chemical sales to a
Wyoming user who elected to make equipment modifications rather than continue
chemical treatments.

Total operating expenses (costs of government contracts and other operating
costs) increased by $66,000 in 2002 as a result of a higher mix of equipment
sales where profit margins are less than for the company's proprietary
chemicals. ADA-ES experienced positive gross margins in 2002 and 2001 of 46% and
47%, respectively, but these were somewhat less than margins in excess of 50%
expected from routine operations and resulted from ADA-ES activities to
establish further market acceptance and its market share for its ADA 249 fluxing
agents. The Company's continued future success will be dependent upon generating
improved gross margins, which in turn are dependent upon increased sales and
market penetration. Development expenses related to the introduction of ADA-249
increased expenses by a net of approximately of $127,000 and $250,000 in 2002
and 2001, respectively.

Consolidated research and development decreased by $9,000 in 2002 to $93,000 as
compared to $102,000 in 2001. Future consolidated research and development
expenses, except for those anticipated to be funded by the DOE contracts and
others that may be awarded, are expected to be approximately $100,000 per year
for the next several years.

General and administrative expenses decreased by $100,000 to $2,054,000 in 2002
primarily as a result of consolidating the northeast office operations, closed
in January 2002, in Littleton, Colorado.

In the fourth quarter of 2001, Registrant recorded a non-cash write down
totaling $2,088,000 in the carrying value of the Calgary facility. This
write-down is in addition to a $2,873,000 non-cash write down recorded in 2000.
The further write down was made in recognition of (i) the changed business
climate after the events of September 11, 2001 which has made unlikely any
near-term purified phosphate production at the facility and (ii) the fact that
the remaining capitalized costs were not expected to be recovered out of the now
anticipated future operations. The write down reduced the net asset carrying
value to a level that management believes will be recoverable from the sale of
surplus equipment and future subleasing of the building and site.

<PAGE>

The Calgary facility is located on a site leased from the adjacent landowner who
originally supplied feedstock to the facility in the 1980's. The lease has an
indefinite term, but upon ESEC's permanent termination of operations, ESEC has a
period of 24 months to remove all equipment, improvement and structures erected
on the site after which time such assets become the sole property of the
landlord. ESEC also has the obligation to return the site and any surrendered
assets to the landlord in a safe condition that complies with the requirements
of all statues, regulations and ordinances. Although ESEC has no current intent
to terminate the lease and believes the site is currently in compliance with all
regulations, ESEC has accrued and recorded as a liability of approximately
$600,000 as an estimate of the ultimate costs it would expect to incur to return
the facility to the landlord under the terms of the lease. The amount recorded
is an estimate that includes significant assumptions, and it is reasonably
possible that these assumptions could change in the future, and that such a
change could be material. The landlord commissioned a Phase 1 environmental
study of the leased site. Although this Phase 1 study did not include any costs
estimates, the landlord has estimated the cost substantially higher than ESEC's
estimated costs. The difference in estimates primarily relates to ESEC basing
its estimate on revised quantities of the waste on site, assumptions regarding
future us of the building (including the future cost to demolish the building),
and supervision costs. Any significant change to ESEC's estimates could result
in further expenses being recorded at that time.

If the Company should abandon, dispose or otherwise cease operations in Canada,
the cumulative foreign currency adjustment recorded as a contra equity amount of
$1,837,000 will be recorded as an operating expense. Such adjustment, however,
will have no effect on net equity.

Registrant's interest expense totaled approximately $164,000 for 2002 and
$226,000 for 2001. Interest expense includes approximately $23,000 and $38,000
in 2002 and 2001, respectively, from activities related to Calgary. The decrease
in interest expense of $62,000 is due to improved cash flow that allowed the
Company in the spring of 2002 to end an accounts receivable factoring
arrangement. With improved cash flow the Company was able to avoid any
significant additional borrowing.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
------------------------------------------
As previously discussed, the Company's critical accounting policies and
estimates include the estimated reclamation liability recorded in connection
with the Calgary facility.

Other significant estimates used in preparation of the financial statements
include the Company's allowance for doubtful accounts, which is based on
historical experience. However, a significant amount of the Company's accounts
receivable ($397,000 at December 31, 2002) is from the federal government.
Amounts invoiced for government contracts are subject to change based on the
results of future audits by the federal government. The Company has not
experienced significant adjustments in the past, and as a result it is unlikely
that a significant adjustment will be made in the future.

The Company has also estimated the net residual of its equipment at the Calgary
facility to be approximately $396,000, which is included in other assets. This
estimate could change based on many factors, including the ultimate outcome of
the litigation noted above.

The Company uses its judgment to support the current fair value of goodwill and
other intangible assets of $2.1 million on the consolidated balance sheet.
Although the Company has had an independent valuation prepared, which support
its recorded value and, management believes the fair value of other recorded
intangibles are not impaired, market demand for the Company's product and
services could change in the future requiring a write-down in recorded values.

As with all estimates, the amounts described above are subject to change as
additional information becomes available.

<PAGE>

New Accounting Pronouncements:
------------------------------
     Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements - In June 2001, the
     Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statements of
     Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 Business Combinations ("SFAS 141")
     and No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ("SFAS 142"). SFAS 141
     requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be
     accounted for under the purchase method. For all business combinations for
     which the date of acquisition is after June 30, 2001, SFAS 141 also
     establishes specific criteria for the recognition of intangible assets
     separately from goodwill and requires unallocated negative goodwill to be
     written off immediately as an extraordinary gain, rather than deferred and
     amortized. SFAS 142 changes the accounting for goodwill and other
     intangible assets after an acquisition. The most significant changes made
     by SFAS 142 are: 1) goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives
     will no longer be amortized; 2) goodwill and intangible assets with
     indefinite lives must be tested for impairment at least annually; and 3)
     the amortization period for intangible assets with finite lives will no
     longer be limited to forty years. The Company has performed a detail
     valuation analysis in connection with the adoption of these statements and
     has determined that there is no impairment to its carrying value for
     goodwill. The adoption of SFAS 142 has resulted in a reduction of
     amortization expense of approximately $388,000, whereby 2001 pro forma net
     loss would have been reduced to $(2,533,000) or $(.08) per share if SFAS
     142 had been implemented in the prior year.

     In June 2001, the FASB also approved for issuance SFAS 143 Asset Retirement
     Obligations. SFAS 143 establishes accounting requirements for retirement
     obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets, including (1) the
     timing of the liability recognition, (2) initial measurement of the
     liability, (3) allocation of asset retirement cost to expense, (4)
     subsequent measurement of the liability and (5) financial statement
     disclosures. SFAS 143 requires that an asset retirement cost should be
     capitalized as part of the cost of the related long-lived asset and
     subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method.
     The Company will adopt the statement effective no later than January 1,
     2003, as required. The transition adjustment resulting from the adoption of
     SFAS 143 will be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
     principle. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the effect
     of the adoption of this statement on its financial position, results of
     operations, or cash flows.

     In April 2002, the FASB approved for issuance Statements of Financial
     Accounting Standards No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and
     64, Amendment of SFAS 13, and Technical Corrections ("SFAS 145"). SFAS 145
     rescinds previous accounting guidance, which required all gains and losses
     from extinguishment of debt be classified as an extraordinary item. Under
     SFAS 145 classification of debt extinguishment depends on the facts and
     circumstances of the transaction. SFAS 145 is effective for fiscal years
     beginning after May 15, 2002 and adoption is not expected to have a
     material effect on the Company's financial position or results of its
     operations.

     In July 2002, the FASB issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
     No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities
     (SFAS 146). SFAS 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with
     exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date
     of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Examples of costs covered by
     SFAS 146 include lease termination costs and certain employee severance
     costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued operation,
     plant closing, or other exit or disposal activity. SFAS 146 is to be
     applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after
     December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 146 is not expected to have a
     material effect on the Company's financial position or results of its
     operations.

<PAGE>

     In December 2002, the FASB issued Statements of Financial Accounting
     Standards No.148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and
     Disclosure - An Amendment of FASB Statement 123 (SFAS 123). For entities
     that change their accounting for stock-based compensation from the
     intrinsic method to the fair value method under SFAS 123, the fair value
     method is to be applied prospectively to those awards granted after the
     beginning of the period of adoption (the prospective method). The amendment
     permits two additional transition methods for adoption of the fair value
     method. In addition to the prospective method, the entity can choose to
     either (i) restate all periods presented (retroactive restatement method)
     or (ii) recognize compensation cost from the beginning of the fiscal year
     of adoption as if the fair value method had been used to account for awards
     (modified prospective method). For fiscal years beginning December 15,
     2003, the prospective method will no longer be allowed. The Company
     currently accounts for its stock-based compensation using the intrinsic
     value method as proscribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
     "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and plans on continuing using
     this method to account for stock options , therefore, it does not intend to
     adopt the transition requirements as specified in SFAS 148. The Company has
     adopted the new SFAS 148 disclosure requirements in these financial
     statements.


Item 7. Financial Statements. (see pages F-1 through F-24)
----------------------------------------------------------
Index to Financial Statements
Independent Auditor's Report
Financial Statements:
     Earth Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries
     Consolidated Balance Sheet, December 31, 2002
     Consolidated Statements of Operations, For the Years Ended December 31,
       2002 and 2001
     Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity, For the Period from
       January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2002
     Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, For the Years Ended December 31,
       2002 and 2001
     Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

PART III

Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance With Section 16(a) of
the Exchange Act.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                              Term        First Became
      Name             Age            Position and Offices                   Expires        Director
      ----             ---   ----------------------------------------        -------        --------
<S>                    <C>                                                <C>                 <C>
Ramon E. Bisque        71    Chairman of the Board of Directors           Annual Meeting      1963
                                                                            Date, 2003

Duane N. Bloom         69    Director and Secretary                             "             1963

Michael D. Durham      53    Director, President of ADA-ES, Member of           "             1997
                             the Audit Committee

Ronald B. Johnson      71    Director, Member of the Audit Committee            "             1999

Robert H. Lowdermilk   66    Director, Member of the Audit Committee            "             1990

Mark H. McKinnies      51    Director, President and Treasurer of ESI,          "             1983
                             Chief Financial Officer of ADA-ES

Rollie J. Peterson     55    Director, Member of the Audit Committee            "             2000

</TABLE>

     The appointment of Michael D. Durham to the Board of Directors of
Registrant (the "Board") in 1997 was made pursuant to the ADA-ES Purchase
Agreement whereby Registrant agreed to make available one seat on the Board
between April 30, 1997 and November 1, 1998, and so long thereafter as the
recipients of shares of Registrant in that transaction continue, in the
aggregate, to hold no less than 1,000,000 shares. Management shareholders of
Registrant entered into voting agreements, agreeing to vote their shares of
stock in favor of the designated individual. There are no other arrangements or
understandings between any directors or executive officers and any other person
or persons pursuant to which they were selected as director or executive
officer. None of our directors hold director positions in other public
companies.

     Each of the officers named above serves from year to year at the pleasure
of the Board of Directors. Drs. Bisque and Bloom were first elected to the Board
of Directors of Earth Sciences, Inc.`s predecessor company as of February 14,
1963. Drs. Bisque and Bloom were first elected to serve in their present offices
on March 22, 1974. Mr. McKinnies was elected Controller on January 25, 1980,
Secretary on January 23, 1981 and as a Director and President on February 23,
1983.

     Dr. Bisque is Professor Emeritus at the Colorado School of Mines, Golden,
Colorado and was a co-founder of Earth Sciences, Inc. in 1963. Dr. Bisque has
been Chairman of the Board of Directors and a full or part time employee of
Registrant since 1974.

     Dr. Bloom was a co-founder of Earth Sciences, Inc. in 1963. Dr. Bloom was
employed full time by Registrant since that time through 1999. Dr. Bloom has
been retired since that time.

     Dr. Durham was a co-founder in 1982 of ADA Technologies, Inc., an
Englewood, Colorado private company which contracts to the Federal government
and others for development of emission technologies. Dr. Durham is president of
ADA-Environmental Solutions LLC, a majority-owned subsidiary of Registrant. Dr.
Durham was appointed to the Board on April 30, 1997.

<PAGE>

     Mr. Johnson was appointed to the Board in May 1999. He has been the
Chairman of Twin Kem International, Inc., a distributor of agricultural and
industrial chemicals, since 1984.

     Mr. Lowdermilk has been president of Tectonic Construction Company, a
producer of washed aggregates and specialty sands since 1986. Mr. Lowdermilk has
a long history in construction and engineering projects.

     Mr. McKinnies is a CPA and worked for Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. before
commencing employment at ESI in 1978. Mr. McKinnies was elected President of
Registrant in February 1983.

     Mr. Peterson is a self-employed businessman and president and co-owner of
Cobblestone Development Co., a commercial land development company in Minnesota
that he helped found in 1987.

     No family relationship exists between any individuals named in this Item 9.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
-------------------------------------------------------
     Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Registrant's
officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a
registered class of the Company's equity securities, to file reports of
ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Officers,
directors and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC
regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they
file.

     Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it, or
written representations from certain reporting persons, Registrant believes that
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, all filing requirements
applicable to its officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial
owners were met.

Item 10. Executive Compensation.
--------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 Summary Compensation Table
                                 --------------------------
                                                                   Long Term Compensation Awards
                                           Annual Compensation     -----------------------------
Name of Individual and Principal          ----------------------   Securities Underlying Options
Position                          Year    Salary (1)   Other (2)             (#) (3)
--------                          ----    ----------   ---------   -----------------------------
<S>                               <C>     <C>           <C>                   <C>
C. Jean Bustard                   2002    $97,170       $26,633                  -
Executive Vice President of       2001    $88,086       $24,180                  -
ADA-ES                            2000    $80,458       $22,118               93,860

Michael D. Durham                 2002    $150,652      $35,742                  -
President of ADA-ES and           2001    $142,911      $34,270                  -
Director                          2000    $132,021      $31,734               145,484

Mark H. McKinnies                 2002    $149,156      $35,628                  -
President, Director and Chief     2001    $137,989      $33,698                  -
Financial Officer of ADA-ES       2000    $122,934      $31,734               140,792

Richard J. Schlager               2002    $92,041       $25,335                  -
ADA-ES Vice President of          2001    $86,934       $24,007                  -
Contract Research & Development   2000    $76,668       $21,231               93,860

John F. Wurster                   2002    $196,811      $34,043                  -
ADA-ES Vice President of          2001    $298,844      $32,279                  -
Sales and Marketing               2000    $338,185      $31,747               400,000


<PAGE>

----------
(1)  The salary amount for Mr. Wurster includes $22,009, $170,438 and $61,799
     paid to Orion Issues Management, Inc. ("OIMI") on his behalf in 2000, 2001
     and 2002, respectively. Mr. Wurster performs a portion of his services to
     the Company through OIMI. The Company has no other relationship with OIMI.
(2)  Amounts represent discretionary pension contributions, 401(k) deferrals and
     matching payments made to a qualified plan by the Company for the benefit
     of the named individual. In all years such amounts include stock issued by
     the Company for the discretionary pension contribution portion of such
     payments averaging 40% of the amounts shown.

                     Options/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year
                                Individual Grants

None


    Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and FY-End Option Values

                                                                Number of securities
                                                               underlying unexercised          Value of unexercised
                           Shares acquired       Value           options at FY-end(#)            options at FY-End
Name                       on exercise (#)    realized ($)   exercisable/not exercisable    exercisable/not exercisable
----                       ---------------    ------------   ---------------------------    ---------------------------
C. Jean Bustard                  -0-              $-0-               93,860/ -0-                     $-0- /-0
Michael D. Durham                -0-              $-0-              145,484/ -0-                     $-0- /-0-
Mark H. McKinnies              140,792            -$-0-               -0- / -0-                      $-0- /-0-
Richard J. Schlager              -0-              $-0-               93,860/ -0-                     $-0- /-0
John F. Wurster                  -0-              -$-0-             400,000/ -0-                     $-0- /-0-
</TABLE>

Compensation of Directors
-------------------------
Directors who are not also executive officers of Registrant are accruing
compensation in the amount of $500 per quarter, which amount may be paid by
issuance of Registrant's common stock, and are reimbursed for any out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in attendance at meetings.

Item 13. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
------------------------------------------

(a) Exhibits and Index of Exhibits (all exhibits except as otherwise noted are
incorporated by reference; Exhibit 2.1 and 2.2 were filed as exhibits to
Registrant's April 30, 1997 Form 8K; Exhibit 10.12 was filed as an exhibit to
Registrant's 1997 Form 10KSB, Exhibits 3.1, 10.15 and 21.1 were filed as
exhibits to Registrant's 1998 Form 10KSB, Exhibit 4.6 and 10.16 were filed as
exhibits to Registrant's 2000 Form 10KSB, Exhibit 10.17 and 10.18 were filed as
exhibits to Registrant's 2001 Form 10KSB, Exhibits 10.19 through 10.22 and 99.1
were filed as exhibits to Registrant's 2002 Form 10KSB, all other such Exhibits
were filed as exhibits to Registrant's 1993 Form 10KSB).

No.         Description
---         -----------
2.1         Stock Option and Exchange Agreement and exhibits among Earth
            Sciences, Inc. and ADA-ES, Inc., ADA Environmental Solutions LLC,
            ADA Technologies, Inc., C. Jean Bustard, John F. Wurster, Kenneth E.
            Baldrey and Cameron E. Martin dated April 30, 1997.
2.2         Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of ADA Environmental
            Solutions LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, April 30, 1997.
3.1         Articles of Incorporation, as amended and restated.
3.2         By-laws.
4.6         Amended and Restated 10% Convertible Debenture Due September 8, 2003
10.2        Lease dated April 3, 1978 between Western Co-operative Fertilizers,
            Limited and ESI Resources, Ltd.
10.12       Assignment of Net Profits Interest dated November 1, 1997 from
            Registrant, ESI Resource Limited, and Earth Sciences Extraction
            Company to Yankee Atomic Electric Company and Vermont Yankee Nuclear
            Power Corporation.
10.15       Amended and Restated Promissory Note dated September 8, 2000
10.16       Market Development Agreement between Norit Americas Inc. and Earth
            Sciences, Inc. dated June 29, 2001

<PAGE>

No.         Description
---         -----------
10.17       Joint Venture and Co-Marketing Agreement by and between ADA
            Environmental Solutions, LLC and Arch Coal Sales Company dated
            January 1, 2002
10.19       Earth Science, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan dated December 7, 2000
10.20       Stock Option Agreement dated December 7, 2000 between Earth
            Sciences, Inc. and John F. Wurster
10.21       Distribution Agreement between Earth Sciences, Inc. and ADA-ES, Inc.
            dated March 17, 2003
10.22       Joint Product Exploitation and Marketing Agreement dated October 2,
            2002, by and between ALSTOM Power Inc. and ADA Environmental
            Solutions LLC
21.1        Subsidiaries of Registrant.
23.1*       Consent of Hein + Associates LLP
99.1        Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(*) - filed herewith.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K.

None.

<PAGE>


SIGNATURES
----------
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.

Earth Sciences, Inc.
--------------------
 (Registrant)

By /s/ Mark H. McKinnies                    /s/ Ramon E. Bisque
------------------------                    -------------------
Mark H. McKinnies, President                Ramon E.  Bisque
and Principal Financial Officer             Chairman of The Board of Directors

Date:   May 30, 2003                        May 30, 2003
        ------------                        ------------

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.

/s/ Ramon E. Bisque                         /s/ Robert H. Lowdermilk
-------------------                         -------------------------
Ramon E.  Bisque                            Robert H. Lowdermilk
Chairman of The Board of Directors          Director

May 30, 2003                                May 30, 2003
------------                                ------------
   Date                                         Date


/s/ Duane N. Bloom                          /s/ Michael D. Durham
------------------                          ---------------------
Duane N.  Bloom, Director                   Michael D. Durham, Director

May 30, 2003                                May 30, 2003
------------                                ------------
   Date                                        Date


/s/ Mark H. McKinnies                       /s/ Ronald B. Johnson
---------------------                       ---------------------
Mark H. McKinnies, Director                 Ronald B. Johnson, Director

May 30, 2003                                May 30, 2003
------------                                ------------
   Date                                        Date


/s/ Rollie J. Peterson
----------------------
Rollie J. Peterson, Director

May 30, 2003
------------
   Date

<PAGE>




                      Earth Sciences, Inc. And Subsidiaries

                              Financial Statements
                                December 31, 2002



                          INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                                                                            PAGE
                                                                            ----

Independent Auditor's Report.................................................F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheet - December 31, 2002...............................F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations - For the Years Ended
        December 31, 2002 and 2001...........................................F-4

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity -
        For the Years Ended December 31, 2002 and 2001.......................F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - For the Years Ended
        December 31, 2002 and 2001...........................................F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements...................................F-7







                                       F-1
<PAGE>





                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT




To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Earth Sciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Golden, Colorado


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Earth Sciences,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Earth Sciences, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.




HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP

Denver, Colorado
February 28, 2003


                                      F-2
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                        EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                             CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
                                  DECEMBER 31, 2002

                                       ASSETS
                                       ------
CURRENT ASSETS:
<S>                                                                     <C>
    Cash and cash equivalents                                           $    323,000
    Trade receivables, with allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,000      1,116,000
    Inventories                                                               87,000
    Prepaid expenses and other                                               119,000
                                                                        ------------
             Total current assets                                          1,645,000

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, at cost                                     1,364,000
    Less accumulated depreciation and amortization                          (755,000)
                                                                        ------------
             Net property, plant and equipment                               609,000

GOODWILL, net of $1,556,000 in amortization                                2,024,000

INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net of $17,000 in amortization                             88,000

OTHER ASSETS                                                                 413,000
                                                                        ------------
TOTAL ASSETS                                                            $  4,779,000
                                                                        ============
                        LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
                        ------------------------------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
    Notes payables:
         Related parties                                                $    100,000
         Others                                                              191,000
    Accounts payable                                                         482,000
    Accrued expenses                                                         208,000
    Current portion-capital lease obligations                                  4,000
    Deferred revenue                                                         383,000
                                                                        ------------
             Total current liabilities                                     1,368,000

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
    Capital lease obligations                                                 10,000
    Notes to related parties, net of current portion                       1,050,000
    Notes payable to vendors, net of current portion                         172,000
    Other liabilities                                                        752,000
                                                                        ------------
                                                                           1,984,000
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 5, and 8)

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
    Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized;
         33,364,000 shares issued and outstanding                            334,000
    Additional paid-in capital                                            28,746,000
    Accumulated deficit                                                  (25,816,000)
    Foreign currency translation adjustment                               (1,837,000)
                                                                        ------------
             Total stockholders' equity                                    1,427,000
                                                                        ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY                              $  4,779,000
                                                                        ============


                See accompanying notes to these financial statements.

                                         F-3
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


                                                       FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                                           DECEMBER 31,
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                      2002             2001
                                                  ------------     ------------
REVENUE:
    Chemical sales, consulting and other          $  3,095,000     $  2,996,000
    Government contracts                             2,649,000        2,575,000
                                                  ------------     ------------
         Total revenues                              5,744,000        5,571,000

COST AND EXPENSES:
    Cost of government contracts                     1,647,000        1,678,000
    Other operating costs                            1,433,000        1,336,000
    General and administrative                       2,054,000        2,154,000
    Research and development                            93,000          102,000
    Depreciation and amortization                      114,000          928,000
    Impairment of assets                                  --          2,088,000
                                                  ------------     ------------
         Total expenses                              5,341,000        8,286,000
                                                  ------------     ------------

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)                                403,000       (2,715,000)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
    Interest expense                                  (164,000)        (226,000)
    Other, net                                           4,000           20,000
                                                  ------------     ------------
             Total other income (expense)             (160,000)        (206,000)
                                                  ------------     ------------

NET INCOME (LOSS)                                 $    243,000     $ (2,921,000)
                                                  ============     ============

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING          32,957,044       32,461,621
                                                  ============     ============

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
    (Basic and diluted)                           $        .01     $       (.09)
                                                  ============     ============



              See accompanying notes to these financial statements.

                                       F-4
<PAGE>

                                           EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
                                      FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 AND 2001



                                            COMMON STOCK           ADDITIONAL                    CUMULATIVE
                                    ---------------------------     PAID-IN      ACCUMULATED     TRANSLATION
                                       SHARES         AMOUNT        CAPITAL        DEFICIT       ADJUSTMENTS         TOTAL
                                    ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------    ------------    ------------

BALANCES, January 1, 2001             32,179,000   $    322,000   $ 28,367,000   $(23,138,000)   $ (1,837,000)   $  3,714,000

    Stock options exercised              115,000          1,000         57,000           --              --            58,000
    Stock issued to employees for
      services                           451,000          5,000        149,000           --              --           154,000
    Net loss                                --             --             --       (2,921,000)           --        (2,921,000)
                                    ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------    ------------    ------------

BALANCES, December 31, 2001           32,745,000        328,000     28,573,000    (26,059,000)     (1,837,000)      1,005,000

    Stock options exercised              141,000          1,000         34,000           --              --            35,000
    Stock issued to employees for
      services                           478,000          5,000        139,000           --              --           144,000
    Net income                              --             --             --          243,000            --           243,000
                                    ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------    ------------    ------------

BALANCES, December 31, 2002           33,364,000   $    334,000   $ 28,746,000   $(25,816,000)   $ (1,837,000)   $  1,427,000
                                    ============   ============   ============   ============    ============    ============



                                   See accompanying notes to these financial statements.

                                                          F-5
<PAGE>

                               EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                               CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


                                                                             FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                                                                 DECEMBER 31,
                                                                         --------------------------
                                                                             2002           2001
                                                                         -----------    -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
    Net income (loss)                                                    $   243,000    $(2,921,000)
    Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
         operating activities:
             Depreciation and amortization                                   114,000        928,000
             Impairment of Calgary facility                                     --        2,088,000
             Expenses paid with stock                                        144,000        154,000
             Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                 (Increase) decrease in:
                      Receivables                                           (468,000)      (133,000)
                      Inventories                                            240,000       (284,000)
                      Other assets                                             7,000         24,000
                 Increase (decrease) in:
                      Accounts payable                                       146,000        174,000
                      Accrued expenses                                        26,000         (9,000)
                      Other liabilities                                     (394,000)       571,000
                                                                         -----------    -----------
         Net cash provided by operating activities                            58,000        592,000

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
    Capital expenditures                                                     (81,000)      (131,000)
                                                                         -----------    -----------
         Net cash used in investing activities                               (81,000)      (131,000)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
    Payments on notes payable and long-term debt                            (190,000)      (151,000)
    Proceeds for exercise of stock options                                      --           33,000
                                                                         -----------    -----------
         Net cash used in financing activities                              (190,000)      (118,000)

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                            (213,000)       343,000

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year                                 536,000        193,000
                                                                         -----------    -----------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year                                   $   323,000    $   536,000
                                                                         ===========    ===========
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
    Cash payments for interest                                           $   157,000    $   158,000
                                                                         ===========    ===========
    Stock and options issued for services                                $   144,000    $   154,000
                                                                         ===========    ===========
    Conversion of accounts payable into notes payable                    $      --      $    33,000
                                                                         ===========    ===========
    Exercise of stock options by cancellation of accrued liabilities     $    35,000    $    25,000
                                                                         ===========    ===========


                       See accompanying notes to these financial statements.

                                                F-6
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.   SUMMARY OF NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
     --------------------------------------------------------------------

     Nature of Operations - The accompanying consolidated financial statements
     include the accounts of Earth Sciences, Inc. (ESI) and its wholly-owned
     subsidiaries, ESI Resources Limited (ESIR), ADA Environment Solutions LLC
     (ADA), and ESI Chemicals, Inc. (ESIC). ADA has been consolidated with ESI
     and its subsidiaries since its acquisition, effective May 1, 1997. ESIC has
     been a dormant subsidiary since 1983. ESIR's only asset is its investment
     in its wholly-owned subsidiary, Earth Sciences Extraction Company (ESEC).
     All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
     Collectively, these entities are referred to as the Company.

     The Company is principally engaged in providing environmental technologies
     and specialty chemicals to the coal-burning utility industry. The Company
     also generates substantial revenue from government contracts. The Company
     sales occur principally throughout the United States. While the Company had
     improved financial results in the year 2002, continued improvements are
     required to improve liquidity. The Company anticipants that the Department
     of Energy contracts (Note 3), improved results at ADA, and reduced
     expenditures at the Calgary facility will further improve financial results
     and liquidity. Unsatisfactory operations of any of the ADA units could
     frustrate the Company's ability to continue profitablity.

     Cash Equivalents - For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company
     considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of
     three months or less to be cash equivalents.

     Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market,
     determined by the first-in, first-out method and consist of supplies.

     Percentage of Completion - ADA follows the percentage of completion method
     of accounting for all significant long-term contracts excluding government
     contracts. The Company recognizes revenue on government contracts based on
     the time and expenses incurred to date. The percentage of completion method
     of reporting income from contracts takes into account the cost and revenue
     to date on contracts not yet completed. Except for the government contracts
     discussed in Note 3 below, the Company had no material long-term contracts
     in progress at December 31, 2002.

     Revenue Recognition - ADA chemical sales are recognized when products are
     shipped to customers. A reserve is established for any returns, based on
     historical trends. Chemical products are shipped FOB shipping point and
     title passes to the customer when the chemicals are shipped. The Company's
     sales agreements do no contain right of inspection or acceptance provision
     and products are generally received by customers within one day of
     shipment. The Company has had no significant history of non-acceptance, nor
     of replacing goods damaged or lost in transit. ADA equipment sales are
     recognized when the equipment is delivered and installed, and all return or
     buy back privileges have expired. Government contracts are recognized as
     services are performed based on various estimates provided by management.


                                      F-7
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


     Property, Plant and Equipment - Property, plant and equipment is stated at
     cost. Depreciation on other assets is provided using the straight-line
     method based on estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 15 years.
     Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. When assets
     are retired, or otherwise disposed of, the property accounts are relieved
     of costs and accumulated depreciation and any resulting gain or loss is
     credited or charged to income. Under the Company's current operating plan,
     it does not intend to ultimately mine its mineral properties, but rather,
     sell an interest in the properties to an industry partner for cash and/or a
     royalty. As a result, gains and losses from the sale of mineral properties
     are reflected in other income.

     Other Assets and Liabilities - Other assets consist primarily of the
     Calgary facility of $396,000. Since the Calgary facility was idled in
     August of 1999, depreciation has been provided on a straight-line basis
     using an estimated useful life of 15 years. Other liabilities include
     $600,000, which is the Company estimate as to the future decommissioning
     costs associated with facilities. The Company is in litigation as to the
     lease and rail access to this facility (see Notes 2 and 5).

     Intangible Assets - Intangible assets principally consist of patents.
     Acquired patents are being amortized over a 7-year period using the
     straight-line method, which is less than the remaining legal life of the
     patents. Patents obtained by the Company directly are being amortized over
     a 17-year life.

     Intangible assets consists of:

                                        Accumulated
                            Cost        Amortization       Net
                         -----------    ------------   -----------

        Patents          $   105,000    $   (17,000)   $    88,000
                         ===========    ===========    ===========

     Goodwill - Goodwill consists of the excess of the aggregate purchase price
     over the fair value of net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill was
     amortized over a 10-year period through December 31, 2001. Beginning on
     January 1, 2002, Goodwill was no longer amortized but is subject to
     impairment testing as discussed below. The changes in the carrying amount
     of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                               Accumulated
                                                  Goodwill     amortization        Net
                                                 -----------   ------------   -----------
          <S>                                    <C>           <C>            <C>
          Balance as of January 1, 2001          $ 3,580,000   $(1,184,000)   $ 2,413,000
          Amortization expense for the year             --     $  (389,000)      (389,000)
                                                 -----------   -----------    -----------
          Balance December 31, 2001              $ 3,580,000   $(1,573,000)   $ 2,024,000
          Amortization expense for the year             --            --             --
                                                 -----------   -----------    -----------
          Balance December 31, 2002              $ 3,580,000   $(1,573,000)   $ 2,024,000
                                                 ===========   ===========    ===========
</TABLE>

     As of January 1, 2002, the Company adopted FAS 142, "Goodwill and Other
     Intangible Assets." Under FAS 142, Goodwill is no longer amortized, but
     subject to an impairment evaluation, which is performed in the fourth
     quarter of each year.

     During fiscal 2002, the Company engaged an investment banking firm to
     perform a valuation of the ADA. As a result of this evaluation as well as
     other factors, the Company concluded that no impairment of its goodwill was
     required.

                                      F-8
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - In 2001 the Company followed Statement of
     Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121, Impairment of Long-Lived
     Assets. In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the cost of
     assets or intangible assets may be impaired, an evaluation of
     recoverability would be performed. In the fourth quarter of 2001, a further
     evaluation of the Calgary facility was performed in light of the business
     climate after events of September 11, 2001. The estimated future
     undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset were compared to the
     asset's net carrying amount to determine if a write-down to market value or
     discounted cash flow value was required. The results of the test indicated
     that an impairment was required. The Company recorded an impairment of
     $2,088,000 in 2001 to reduce the facility's carrying value to the estimated
     fair value after giving consideration to the remote nature of any future
     payment on the net profits royalty directly related to the facility.

     In 2002 the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounts Standards
     (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
     Assets. According to SFAS 144, an impairment exists when the carrying
     amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. As of December 31,
     2002, the carrying value of this facility approximated the estimated future
     cash flows, as calculated under SFAS 144, therefore the Company did not
     recognize any additional impairment expense for the year ended December 31,
     2002.

     Income Taxes - The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability
     method of SFAS No. 109, whereby current and deferred tax assets and
     liabilities are determined based on tax rates and laws enacted as of the
     balance sheet date.

     Foreign Currency Translation - Through September 30, 1997, the accounts of
     ESEC were maintained in Canadian dollars, its functional currency at that
     time. Assets and liabilities were translated into U.S. dollars at the
     current exchange rate, and earnings or losses were translated at the
     average exchange rate for the year; resulting translation adjustments were
     recorded as a separate component of stockholders' equity.

     During 1997, ESEC ended its construction and start-up phase of the Calgary
     plant and commenced production and sales activities of its primary product.
     While in operation, the Company purchased most of its raw materials and
     sold most of its products from/to U.S. entities in U.S. dollars and as a
     result, ESEC changed its functional currency from Canadian dollars to U.S.
     dollars during 1997. Accordingly, effective October 1, 1997, current assets
     and liabilities denominated in Canadian are translated in U.S. dollars at
     the current exchange rate with any resulting gain or loss recorded in the
     income statement. Property, plant and equipment is recorded at its
     historical costs (U.S. dollars) as of October 1, 1997, after taking into
     effect the foreign currency translation adjustment from Canadian dollars to
     U.S. dollars at that date.

     If the Company should abandon, dispose or otherwise cease operations in
     Canada, the cumulative foreign currency adjustment recorded as a contra
     equity amount of $1,837,000 will be recorded as an operating expense. Such
     adjustment, however, will have no effect on net equity.

     Cost of Government Contracts - Costs of government contracts includes all
     labor, subcontract labor, materials, equipment, supplies and travel cost
     directly related and charged to the contracts being performed.

     Research and Development Costs - Research and development costs are charged
     to operations in the period incurred.


                                      F-9
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


     Income (Loss) Per Share - The income (loss) per common share is presented
     in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
     Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the income or loss available to common
     shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
     for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could
     occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised
     or converted into common stock. The effect of considering all potential
     dilutive securities (totaling 2,337,000 and 2,608,000 at December 31, 2002
     and 2001, respectively) are either insignificant for 2002 or antidilutive
     as a result of the Company's net loss for the year ended December 31, 2001.
     Accordingly, basic and diluted EPS are the same for each year.

     Stock-Based Compensation - The Company records expense for stock options
     granted to employees by using APB 25, which requires expense to be
     recognized only to the extent the exercise price of the stock-based
     compensation is below the market price on the date of grant. Transactions
     in equity instruments with non-employees for goods or services are
     accounted for on the fair value method. Because the Company has elected not
     to adopt the fair value accounting described in SFAS No. 123 for employees,
     it is subject only to the disclosure requirements described in SFAS No.
     123.

     Use of Estimates - The preparation of the Company's consolidated financial
     statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
     requires the Company's management to make estimates and assumptions that
     affect the amounts reported in these financial statements and accompanying
     notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company makes
     significant assumptions concerning the impairment of and the remaining
     realizability of its extraction facility, mineral properties and
     intangibles, the deferred tax valuation allowance, as well as future
     decommissioning cost associated with its solvent extraction facility. It is
     at least reasonably possible that the Company's estimates could be
     materially revised within the next year. In addition, the Company enters
     into significant research contracts with the U.S. Government, which are
     subject to future audits. Pursuant to the contracts, the Company makes
     estimates of certain overhead and other rates, which may be adjusted as a
     result of such audits. At this time, the Company does not believe any
     future government audit will result in material adjustment to previously
     recorded revenues.

     Comprehensive Income/Loss - SFAS No. 130 establishes standards for
     reporting and display of comprehensive income/loss, its components and
     accumulated balances. Comprehensive income/loss is defined to include all
     changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners and
     distributions to owners. Comprehensive income/loss was the same as net
     income(loss) in 2002 and 2001.


                                      F-10
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


     Segment Information - The Company follows SFAS No. 131, Disclosure About
     Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. SFAS No. 131 establishes
     standards on the way that public companies report financial information
     about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires
     reporting of selected information about operating segments in interim
     financial statements issued to the public. It also establishes standards
     for disclosures regarding products and services, geographic areas, and
     major customers. SFAS No. 131 defines operating segments as components of a
     company about which separate financial information is available that is
     evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how
     to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company has
     identified the following reportable segments: environmental technology and
     specialty chemicals, government contracts and natural resource exploration.
     The Company also has a segment which maintains an idle solvent extraction
     facility which was previously used for the production of purified phosphate
     products.






                                      F-11
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


2.   PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
     ------------------------------

     Property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2002 is summarized as
     follows:

                                                                Estimated Useful
                                                                      Lives
                                                                ---------------

          Machinery and equipment              $  881,000              10
          Furniture and fixtures                   98,000               5
          Land and mineral properties             385,000
                                               ----------

                                               $1,364,000
                                               ==========

     Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment for the
     years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 was $88,000 and $535,000,
     respectively.

     The Company's mineral properties include patented mining claims. These land
     and mineral properties are not in production. The recovery of the Company's
     investment in these assets is dependent upon future sales of the Company's
     interests therein or production from such assets. In addition, the Company
     leases or has options to lease various other claims. Such leases are
     cancelable at the option of the Company.

     The above table does not include the net assets of the Calgary facility.
     The Company intends to sell certain equipment and other assets currently
     not in use at the facility, but continues to investigate alternative uses
     for the building and related land under lease. The net assets of the
     Calgary facility included under the balance sheet caption "Other Assets"
     amounted to $396,000 as of December 31, 2002, which represents the fair
     market value of the assets held for sale.

                                      F-12
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


3.   GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS:
     ---------------------

     ADA is performing activities under three contracts awarded by the
     Department of Energy (the "DOE") that contributed a total of $2,650,000 and
     $2,575,000 to revenues in 2002 and 2001, respectively. ADA typically
     invoices the DOE monthly for estimated labor and expenditures plus overhead
     factors, less cost share amounts. The total approved DOE budgets for these
     contracts amount to $10,400,000, of which the Company's and industry
     partners' cost-share portion is $3,500,000. The remaining unearned amount
     of the contracts expected to be recognized by the Company (including cash
     contributions by other industry partners) is $2,900,000. The Company is in
     the process of working with DOE on a new contract in which the Company will
     be a subcontractor and primary technology provider for 2003 through 2008.
     These contracts are subject to audit and future appropriation of funds by
     Congress. The Company's historical experience has not resulted in
     significant adverse adjustments to the Company, however the government
     audits for years ended 2002 and 2001 have not yet been finalized.

4.   DEBT:
     -----

                                                                    December 31,
                                                                        2002
                                                                    -----------
     Vendors:
     --------
     Notes payable to companies. Interest at 10% and 11%, monthly
     payments of $4,000 beginning November 1, 2000 with a
     remaining amount due on September 1, 2003 and monthly
     payments of $1,000 continuing through January 2004 with a
     remaining amount due February 2004.                            $   363,000

     Related Parties:
     ----------------
     The Company has a note payable and a debenture to a
     stockholder/director. The note has a remaining balance of
     $150,000 and the debenture is for $1,000,000. Both
     instruments are payable in full September 2003, however the
     Company is currently in the process of renegotiating the
     payment date and has received written confirmation from the
     holder that they will not require principle payments in
     excess of $100,000 in 2003. Both bear interest at the
     greater of prime plus 2% or 10% (10% at December 31, 2002).
     The holder can demand up to a $100,000 annual payment on
     both instruments combined with at least 90 days written
     notice. The instruments are convertible into common stock at
     the lesser of market or $.21 per share, however, the maximum
     number of shares that both can be converted into is
     1,000,000 shares. The note is collateralized by all the
     assets of the Company except ADA's accounts receivable and
     certain intangible assets. Any amounts not converted will be
     repaid in cash. The Company has agreed to certain covenants
     on both instruments, including a covenant not to sell
     substantially all the assets of ESI or any subsidiary. The
     Company has negotiated a verbal agreement with the holder to
     allow for the sale of certain ESEC assets.                       1,150,000
                                                                    -----------
                                                                      1,513,000
              Less current portion                                     (291,000)
                                                                    -----------

     Long-term debt, net of current portion                         $ 1,222,000
                                                                    ===========

                                      F-13
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


     The following table shows maturities by year for all the Company's debt and
     assumes the related party noteholder will request full payment of their
     remaining balance in 2004:

                  2003                                  $  291,000
                  2004                                   1,049,000
                  2005                                       5,000
                                                        ----------

                                                        $1,345,000
                                                        ==========


     Line of Credit - In 2002, ADA negotiated $350,000 line of credit with a
     financial institution. Amounts outstanding under the line of credit bear
     interest at 1% above prime, and such interest is payable monthly. Covenants
     of the line require the Company to meet certain working capital
     requirements. No amounts were outstanding under the line as of December 31,
     2002.

5.   CONTINGENT NET PROFITS ROYALTY ON THE CALGARY FACILITY:
     -------------------------------------------------------

     In 1997, ESI finalized agreements with Yankee Atomic Electric Company and
     Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (the "Yankee Companies") and
     acquired an option to liquidate the liability to them, which at that time
     totaled $9,382,000. The liability arose from prepayments by the Yankee
     Companies for uranium during the period that the Calgary facility operated
     as a uranium extraction facility. Under the agreement, ESI paid the Yankee
     Companies $1,250,000 and granted them a 10-year, 10% net profit royalty on
     activities at the Calgary facility. Future payments to the Yankee Companies
     under the royalty cannot exceed $4,850,000. ESI has the option to purchase
     the royalty interest at December 31, 2002 for $3,250,000. ESI has the
     option to purchase the royalty interest at December 31, 2002 for
     $3,250,000. The Company's option and the 10% net profit royalty from
     operations of the Calgary facility expire in 2007. In the fourth quarter of
     2001, coincidental with a downturn in the economy, management determined
     that the likely prospects for the restart of purified phosphate production
     at the facility were exhausted, that the sale of the remaining assets was
     the most likely course of action, and that the likelihood that any future
     royalty payments was remote. Therefore, the Company considered the remote
     nature of any future payment of the net profits royalty in its impairment
     analysis of the Calgary facility. No net profits payments have been made
     through December 31, 2002.

                                      F-14
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


6.   INCOME TAXES:
     -------------

     Deferred tax assets related to U.S. operations are as follows and are
     comprised of the following at December 31, 2002:

                                                               U.S.
                                                            Operations
                                                            -----------
        Deferred tax assets - non-current:
            Tax effect of net operating loss carryforward   $ 2,165,000
            Tax credit carryforwards                             13,000
            Property basis differences                          167,000
            Compensation related deferrals                      154,000
                                                            -----------
        Deferred tax assets                                   2,499,000
        Less valuation allowance                             (2,499,000)
                                                            -----------

        Net deferred tax assets                             $      --
                                                            ===========


     The Company has remaining U.S. a net operating loss carryforwards at
     December 31, 2002 of approximately $5,835,000, which if not utilized to
     reduce taxable income in future periods, will expire in the years 2003
     through 2021. In addition, the Company has $13,000 of alternative minimum
     tax credit which is available to offset future U.S. regular tax liability.

     The Company also has approximately $6,400,000 in Canadian tax assets, for
     which a full valuation allowance has been provided due to the status of the
     Canadian operations as held for sale. The Canadian tax assets include the
     tax effect of a net operating loss carryforward related to the Canadian
     subsidiary and operations which totaled $4,125,000 (U.S.).

     The utilization of these U.S. net operating loss carryforwards may be
     subject to restrictions because of the ownership changes of the Company
     that occurred as a result of issuances of the Company's securities. These
     restrictions will limit the amount of utilizable net operating loss
     carryforwards per year.

     The change in the valuation allowance in 2002 and 2001 was $(158,000) and
     $121,000, respectively. The Company's net income tax expense (benefit)
     differs from the expected income tax rate of approximately 34% primarily
     due to the change in the valuation allowance.

7.   STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
     ---------------------

     Stock Bonus Plan - The Company has reserved 125,000 shares for awards under
     a stock bonus plan established in 1978. As of December 31, 2002, 15,000
     shares remain available for award under the plan.


                                      F-15
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


     Option Exercises -In 2001 the Company issued 115,000 shares to certain
     officers and employees upon the exercise of options for total consideration
     of $58,000.

     In 2002 the Company issued 141,000 shares to an officer and employee upon
     the exercise of options for total consideration of $35,000.

     Shares Issued for Services - The Company issued 478,000 and 451,000 shares
     of common stock in 2002 and 2001, respectively, for the payments of
     approximately $144,000 and $154,000 of employment related expenses, based
     upon the per share value of unrestricted common stock at the time of
     exchange.

     Stock Options - The following is a table of options issued during 2002 and
     2001:

                                                                        Weighted
                                                                        Average
                                              Employees   Non-employee  Exercise
                                               Options      Options      Price
                                              ---------    ---------     ------

     OPTIONS OUTSTANDING, January 1, 2001     1,883,000      270,000      $0.55

             Options exercised                 (115,000)           -       (.53)
             Options expired                   (160,000)    (170,000)     (1.78)
                                              ---------    ---------     ------

     OPTIONS OUTSTANDING, December 31, 2001   1,608,000      100,000       0.31
             Options granted                    149,000                    0.25
             Options exercised                 (141,000)           -       (.54)
             Options expired                   (279,000)    (100,000)     (1.78)
                                              ---------    ---------     ------

     OPTIONS OUTSTANDING, December 31, 2002   1,337,000            -       0.25
                                              =========    =========     ======


     Options for 149,000 shares were granted in 2002. The weighted average
     remaining contractual life for all options as of December 31, 2002 was
     approximately 3.6 years. At December 31, 2002, all outstanding options were
     fully vested and exercisable.


                                      F-16
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


     If not previously exercised, options outstanding at December 31, 2002, will
     expire as follows:


                                                                       Weighted
                                    Range                              Average
                               ----------------       Number of        Exercise
               Year            Low         High        Options          Price
               ----            ---         ----        -------          -----

               2005            .25          .25       1,173,000         $ .25
               2006            .30          .30          15,000         $ .30
               2007            .25          .25         149,000         $ .25
                                                      ---------
                                                      1,337,000
                                                      =========


     Pro Forma Stock-Based Compensation Disclosures - The Company applies APB
     Opinion 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock options
     and warrants which are granted to employees. Accordingly, no compensation
     cost has been recognized for grants of options and warrants to employees
     since the exercise prices were not less than the fair value of the
     Company's common stock on the grant dates. Had compensation cost been
     determined based on an estimate of the fair value consistent with the
     method of SFAS No. 123 at the grant dates for awards under those plans, the
     Company's net income and EPS would have been reduced to the pro forma
     amounts indicated below.

                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                    --------------------------
                                                       2002            2001
                                                    -----------    -----------
       Net income (loss) per share applicable to
          other stockholders:
              As reported                           $   243,000    $(2,921,000)
              Fair value of stock options               (31,000)          --
                                                    -----------    -----------
              Pro forma                             $   212,000    $(2,921,000)
       Net income (loss) per share applicable to
          other shareholders:
              As reported                           $       .01    $      (.09)
              Pro forma                             $       .01    $      (.09)



                                      F-17
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


     There were no options granted in 2001 and options granted in 2002 had an
     exercise price equal to the market price on the date of the grant. The fair
     value of each employee option granted in 2002 was approximately $.21 and
     was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
     model with the following weighted average assumptions:

                                               Years Ended December 31,
                                               ------------------------
                                                   2002         2001
                                               -----------   ----------

         Expected volatility                        87%          N/A
         Risk-free interest rate                   3.50%         N/A
         Expected dividends                          -           N/A
         Expected terms (in years)                   5           N/A


8.   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
     ------------------------------
     Calgary Lease Issues - The Calgary facility is located on a site leased
     from the adjacent landowner who originally supplied feedstock to the
     facility in the 1980's. The lease has an indefinite term, but upon ESEC's
     permanent termination of operations, ESEC has a period of 24 months to
     remove all equipment, improvement and structures erected on the site after
     which time such assets become the sole property of the landlord. ESEC
     believes that the determination of when operations are permanently
     terminated is at its sole discretion. ESEC also has the obligation to
     return the site and any surrendered assets to the landlord in a safe
     condition that complies with the requirements of all statues, regulations
     and ordinances. Although ESEC has no current intent to terminate the lease
     and believes the site is currently in compliance with all regulations, ESEC
     has accrued and recorded as a liability of approximately $600,000 (recorded
     with other long-term liabilities) as an estimate of the ultimate costs it
     would expect to incur to return the facility to the landlord under the
     terms of the lease. The amount recorded is an estimate that includes
     significant assumptions, and it is reasonably possible that these
     assumptions could change in the future and that such a change could be
     material. Without further assessment and sampling an estimate of the
     possible range of costs and related expense cannot be made. The landlord
     commissioned a Phase 1 environmental study of the leased premises. Although
     this Phase 1 study did not include any cost estimates, the landlord has
     estimated the costs substantially higher than ESEC's estimated costs. The
     difference in estimates primarily relates to ESEC basing its estimate on
     revised quantities of the waste on site, assumptions regarding the future
     use of the building (including the future cost to demolish the building),
     and supervision costs. Any significant change to ESEC's estimates could
     result in further expenses being recorded at that time.

     During 2001 the landlord asserted that the cessation of operations at the
     Calgary facility has resulted in the termination of the easement under
     which a rail line services the site and threatened to take steps to
     prohibit the use of and ultimately remove the improvements on the easement
     right-of-way. In January 2002, ESIR filed a motion for injunctive relief to
     restrain the landlord from interfering with use of the rail line. The
     landlord has agreed to an adjournment of the matter to a future date and
     has agreed not to interfere with the use of the rail line until the date of
     the hearing of the Company's application. In September 2002, the landlord
     filed their Statement of Defense and a Counterclaim asserting termination
     of the easement, the site lease and another underlying agreement,

                                      F-18
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


     requesting an order from the Court to that affect and seeking damages in
     the amount of $6 million Canadian to remediate, restore and reclaim the
     leased site and easement. In December 2002 the Company filed a Statement of
     Defence to the Counterclaim vigorously denying breach of any obligation
     under the lease or easement, the landlord's characterization of the
     cessation of operations, the termination of the easement and site lease and
     that any amounts are due for reclamation of the site. To the best of
     management's knowledge and belief, the Company is in compliance with all
     permits and licenses issued for the construction and operation of the
     facility. The Company will continue to defend its rights for this rail line
     access to the site and the validity of the site lease. If the landlord is
     successful in asserting the termination of the rail line easement and site
     lease, it would severely affect the future economic feasibility of any
     operations at the Calgary plant. While there is secure truck access to the
     Calgary plant, the loss of the rail line easement could decrease the
     possibility of some alternative future uses of the Calgary plant.
     Nevertheless, the landlord and the Company have been negotiating a proposal
     for settlement, without prejudice, that has progressed through several
     stages and may result in a withdrawal from the legal action and a plan to
     remediate the site wherein the Company would share in a portion of
     remediation costs by assigning certain assets and by making monthly
     payments to the landlord over an extended period of time. The financial
     implications of an adverse court ruling or a negotiated settlement are
     unknown, and therefore, the financial statements do not include any
     adjustment related to this matter.

     Profit Sharing Retirement Plan - The Company has a defined contribution and
     401(k) plan to cover all eligible employees. The Company paid $159,000 and
     $207,000 as the contributions for 2002 and 2001, respectively, based on a
     percentage of the eligible employees' annual compensation.

     Capital Lease Obligations - The Company leases certain equipment under
     agreements classified as capital leases. Equipment under these leases has a
     cost of $434,000 and accumulated amortization of $420,000 as of December
     31, 2001. The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments
     under capital leases at December 31, 2001. (The capitalized lease
     obligation is classified with other liabilities on the accompanying balance
     sheet.)

        Year                                                         Amount
        ----                                                        ---------

        2003                                                        $   6,000
        2004                                                            5,000
        2005                                                            4,000
        2006                                                            4,000
                                                                    ---------
                Total Future minimum lease payments                    19,000
        Less amount representing interest                              (5,000)
                                                                    ---------
                Present value of net minimum lease payments            14,000
        Less current portion                                           (4,000)
                                                                    ---------
                                                                    $  10,000
                                                                    =========

                                      F-19
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


     Office Lease - The Company leases office space and equipment under
     noncancellable operating leases. Total rental expense was $73,000 for each
     of the years ending December 31, 2002 and 2001. The total minimum rental
     commitments at December 31, 2002 was $820,000 for lease payments due in
     2003 through 2010.

                  Year                                  Amount
                  ----                                ----------

                  2003                                $   97,000
                  2004                                   113,000
                  2005                                   116,000
                  2006                                   119,000
                  2007                                   122,000
                  Thereafter                             253,000
                                                      ----------

                                                      $  820,000
                                                      ==========


     During 1997, the Board of Directors approved a one-year paid sabbatical
     leave for employees who have been employed for 25 years or greater. In
     1999, this plan was terminated, however, the Company continues to be
     obligated to pay the accrued sabbatical benefits already earned. These
     benefits may be paid in cash or stock at the discretion of the Board of
     Directors. As of December 31, 2002, the Company has accrued a net of
     $132,000 in connection with this benefit.

9.   FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
     ------------------------------------

     The estimated fair values for financial instruments under SFAS No. 107,
     Disclosures about Fair value of Financial Instruments, are determined at
     discrete points in time based on relevant market information. These
     estimates involve uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision.

     As discussed in Note 5, the Company can terminate the extraction liability
     at December 31, 2002 for $3,250,000. Management estimates the ultimate
     payment of the liability (based on the current status of the Calgary
     facility) is remote at December 31, 2002. The amount the counterparty would
     be willing to settle this obligation for at December 31, 2002 is unknown
     but management's estimate of the fair value of this liability is
     negligible.

     The Company believes the fair value of all remaining financial instruments
     approximates the carrying amount due to their short-term nature or actual
     interest rates that approximate the Company's effective borrowing rate.


                                      F-20
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


10.  CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK, MAJOR CUSTOMERS, AND OTHER RISKS AND
     UNCERTAINTIES:
     -------------------------------------------------------------------

     Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the
     reporting date if counterparties failed completely to perform as
     contracted. Concentrations of credit risk (whether on or off balance sheet)
     that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of customers or
     counterparties when they have similar economic characteristics that would
     cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly
     effected by changes in economic or other conditions described below. In
     accordance with applicable accounting standards, the credit risk amounts
     shown do not take into account the value of any collateral or security.
     Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk consist
     principally of cash and cash equivalents and receivables.

     Sales to unaffiliated customers which represent 10% or more of the
     Company's sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 were as
     follows (as a percentage of each entity's sales):

          Customer                                     2002       2001
          --------                                     ----       ----

          US Department of Energy                       41%        44%
          Mid American Energy Company                   12%        11%
          Cleco Corporation                             10%        11%
          Alabama Power Company                         14%        11%

     At December 31, 2002, approximately 79% of the Company's trade receivables
     were from five customers.

     A significant portion of ADA's revenue is derived from contracts with
     Department of Energy and chemical and equipment sales to coal-burning
     electric power plants.

11.  BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION:
     -----------------------------

     The Company has identified its principal business segments as natural
     resource exploration, production of purified phosphate products and
     providing environmental technologies and specialty chemicals. The
     accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
     summary of significant accounting policies. These segments are shown in the
     accompanying table as ESI, ESEC, and ADA, respectively. ESEC is located in
     Canada, and all its net assets, amounting to $453,000 are located in
     Canada. ADA, including government contracts, which generally in the past
     has not been specifically segregated for internal financial reporting.

     ESI's reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different
     products and services. They are managed separately because each business
     requires different technology and marketing strategies. Most of the
     businesses were acquired as a unit, and the management at the time of the
     acquisition was retained.

                                      F-21
<PAGE>

                      EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


12.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:
     ------------------

     In March 2003, the Company and ADA-ES, Inc. entered into an agreement (the
     "Distribution Agreement") for the pro rata distribution of all the common
     stock of ADA-ES, Inc. to the shareholders of ESI based on a record date to
     be established by the Board and thereby forming a separate public company.
     The Distribution Agreement requires certain allocations of cash and
     liabilities among ESI and ADA-ES, Inc. prior to the distribution of ADA-ES,
     Inc. common stock.

     Based on the Distribution Agreement, ESI is to issue one share of ADA-ES
     for each ten shares currently owned by the shareholders of ESI. Therefore,
     it is contemplated that approximately 3,400,000 shares of ADA-ES will be
     issued to the shareholders of ESI in the spin-off. The spin-off is subject
     to a number of contingencies and ESI reserves the right to revoke the
     proposed spin-off at any time prior to the distribution date. There can be
     no assurances that the proposed spin-off will actually occur.



                                      F-22
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                             NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                                                                            Eliminating
                                       ESI          ESEC          ADA         Entries   Consolidated
                                   ----------    ----------    ----------   ----------  ------------
2002

<S>                                <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
Revenues from external customers   $     --      $   44,000    $5,700,000   $     --     $5,744,000
                                   ----------    ----------    ----------   ----------   ----------
        Total revenue              $     --      $   44,000    $5,700,000   $     --     $5,744,000
                                   ==========    ==========    ==========   ==========   ==========

Impairment of assets               $     --      $     --      $     --     $     --     $     --
Interest expense                   $  115,000    $   23,000    $   26,000   $     --     $  164,000
Depreciation and amortization      $    1,000    $     --      $  113,000   $     --     $  114,000

Segment operating income (loss)    $  (20,000)   $  (89,000)   $  493,000   $     --     $  403,000
Segment income (loss)              $ (115,000)   $ (111,000)   $  469,000   $     --     $  243,000

Segment assets                     $  353,000    $  453,000    $3,973,000   $     --     $4,779,000
Goodwill, net of amortization      $     --      $     --      $2,024,000   $     --     $2,024,000
Expenses paid with stock           $     --      $     --      $  144,000   $     --     $  144,000
Expenditures for segment assets    $     --      $     --      $   81,000   $     --     $   81,000








                                                F-23
<PAGE>

                                  EARTH SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                               NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


                                                                               Eliminating
                                       ESI           ESEC           ADA          Entries    Consolidated
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------    ----------  ------------
2001

Revenues from external customers   $      --      $    20,000    $ 5,551,000    $     --     $ 5,571,000
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------    ----------   -----------
        Total revenue              $      --      $    20,000    $ 5,551,000    $     --     $ 5,571,000
                                   ===========    ===========    ===========    ==========   ===========

Impairment of assets               $      --      $ 2,088,000    $      --      $     --     $ 2,088,000
Interest expense                   $   126,000    $    27,000    $    73,000    $     --     $   226,000
Depreciation and amortization      $     3,000    $   427,000    $   498,000    $     --     $   928,000
Segment operating income (loss)    $   (67,000)   $(2,640,000)   $   (51,000)   $     --     $(2,758,000)
Segment income (loss)              $  (134,000)   $(2,666,000)   $  (121,000)   $     --     $(2,921,000)

Segment assets                     $   405,000    $    30,000    $ 4,371,000    $     --     $ 4,806,000
Goodwill, net of amortization      $      --      $      --      $ 2,024,000    $     --     $ 2,024,000
Expenses paid with stock           $      --      $      --      $   154,000    $     --     $   154,000
Expenditures for segment assets    $      --      $      --      $   131,000    $     --     $   131,000







                                                  F-24
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark H. McKinnies, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Earth Sciences, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 30, 2003

                                               /s/ Mark H McKinnies
                                               --------------------
                                               Name:  Mark H. McKinnies
                                               Title:  President and Treasurer