alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Videos augment support for Army divestiture program

/ Published July 26, 2016
Battle Creek, Michigan, 
Do you need to know the things to expect when you turn in a computer, a printer, a tent or a truck to DLA Disposition Services?  

The insider info is online, thanks to the work of soldiers from the 1st Cavalry Division and DLA. All can be seen on mobile devices, plus traditional civilian or military computers.

The videos are on the YouTube page for the Division:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmWS0HV-aTwUyBHQm2usjlg

If you can’t reach the YouTube site, you can also go to the public website for DLA or its DLA Disposition Services webpage.

The “How to” videos are on one page, at http://www.dla.mil/CustomerSupport/WarfighterSupport/Army/Turnin/

DLA team members are working directly with soldiers during divestiture turn-ins at forts and bases. They point out that each command will have a process that its units must follow before turning in property to DLA. The videos take up the process once someone has been told to turn in specific types of equipment.

DLA offers special thanks to the soldiers of the 1st Cavalry Division Public Affairs Office for their support in preparing the videos.
# C_2014462EN.01002401.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2014 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)

(Case T-506/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark URB - Earlier national collective word mark URB and earlier national collective figurative mark URB - Absolute ground for refusal - No bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the Community trade mark - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Relative ground for refusal - No authorisation by the proprietor of the earlier marks - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 - No breach of Article 72 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2014/C 462/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA (Suceava, Romania) (represented by: I. Burdusel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock and N. Bambara, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Harun Adiguzel (Diosd, Hungary) (represented by: G. Bozocea, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 July 2013 (Case R 1309/2012-4) concerning invalidity proceedings between Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA and Harun Adiguzel.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA to pay the costs.

| 3. | Declares that Harun Adiguzel is to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that Harun Adiguzel is to bear his own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.

1

---
### Request for Information Phan tom Aerial LLC (FAA-2015-4684) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Nelson: This letter is to inform you that the following inform ation is missing from your peti tion (Docket No. FAA-2015-4684). This information is necessary for the Federal Av iation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Op erations Manual (MPTOM) wh ich is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your inte ntion by the requested response date listed below. Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comm ent tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information described above by January 13, 2016. If we do not receive the information, we wi ll close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feelfree to contact me at (202) 267-2999. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : Wednesday , December 30, 2015 1:02 PM To: phantomaerial@gmail.com
Exhibit 31.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
-------------------------------------------------------

I, Mark H. McKinnies, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Earth Sciences, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer 's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer 's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer 's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer 's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer 's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer 's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer 's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: March 26, 2004
                                             /s/ Mark H. McKinnies
                                             ---------------------
                                             Name:  Mark H. McKinnies
                                             Title:  President and Treasurer
J. 

J. 

transit to or from work ordinarily will not expose the employer to liability" 

unless the evidence shows that the employee was on a "special errand" for 

the employer); Evans, 108 Nev. at 1005-06, 842 P.2d at 721-22 (concluding 

that "an employee who is traveling to or from work is outside the scope of 

his or her employment unless the employee is performing an errand for 

the employer or otherwise conferring a benefit upon the employer"). As 

appellant has conceded that the third party was not working on the day of 

the accident and has provided no evidence that the third party was on a 

special errand or on call for Afandi or in the process of responding to an 

emergency related to Afandi, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Gibbons 

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge 

Howard Roitman, Settlement Judge 

Harold P. Gewerter, Esq., Ltd. 

Hall Jaffe & Clayton, LLP 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1.947A
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 26, 2021

s0223 

# Order

Clerk February 26, 2021

162444

In re VANNATTER, Minors. SC: 162444

COA: 352587

Newaygo CC Family Division:

18

- 009146

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 10, 2020

judgment of the Court of A ppeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS 

JAMES ERIC GRANT, § 

 Appellant § 

 § CAUSE NO. 03-15-00473-CR

V. § TRIAL COURT NO. 69,168 

 § 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, § 

 Appellee § 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

NOW COMES Tim Copeland, PO Box 399, Cedar Park, Texas 78613,

appellate attorney for James Eric Grant, and respectfully moves this Honorable 

Court to allow said attorney to withdraw as attorney of record in this matter, 

terminating his representation of the above referenced appellant and for good 

cause would respectfully show this Honorable Court as follows: 

I.

Contemporaneous with the filing of this Motion to Withdraw, counsel has

filed an Anders brief. Withdrawal of counsel is necessary to permit Mr. Grant to

file a pro se response brief, if he so desires. 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00473-CR

6612953

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

8/24/2015 8:21:09 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/24/2015 8:21:09 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
II.

Pending Deadlines

Appellant’s brief is due September 11, 2015.

III.

Documents Filed and Prepared for Defendant

Counsel has prepared a docketing statement and Appellant’s Brief in this

cause, and has filed same with this Court. Counsel previously prepared

Appellant’s Notice of Appeal, Request for Reporter’s Record and Designations of

Clerk’s Record.

IV.

Notice of Last Known Address of Defendant

Counsel has notified Appellant of the filing of this Motion to Withdraw and

of the filing of this brief by mailing a copy of this Motion to Appellant’s last

known mailing address by regular, first class mail and by certified mail, return

receipt requested, and addressed asfollows:

James Eric Grant

TDCJ No. 01936588

Darrington Unit

59 Darrington Road

Rosharon, TX 77583

V.

WHEREFORE, Movant prays this Honorable Court to allow Movant to

withdraw from the representation of appellant and would, in all things, relieve
Movant herein, discharging Movant from her obligations and responsibilities to

this Defendant in this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

COPELAND LAW FIRM

P.O. Box 399

Cedar Park, TX 78613

Pho: 512.897.8126

Fax: 512.215.8114

Email: tcopeland14@yahoo.com

/s/ Tim Copeland

Tim Copeland

State Bar No. 04801500

Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND OF

COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 9

This is to certify that on August 24, 2015, a true and correct copy of the

above and foregoing document was served on Bob Odom, Assistant District 

Attorney of Bell County, P.O. Box 540, Belton, Texas 76513 and on James Eric 

Grant, TDCJ No. 01936588, Darrington Unit, 59 Darrington Rd., Rosharon, TX 77583 in 

accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and that Appellant’s

brief is in compliance with Rule 9 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and 

that portion which must be included under Rule 9.4(i)(1) contains 462 words.

Further, Counsel certifies that h e has complied with the dictates of Kelly v.

State insofar as providing a motion for Mr. Grant to gain access to his appellate 

records if he so chooses.

/s/ Tim Copeland 

Tim Copeland
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132081 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132081 

 COA: 270976 

Muskegon CC: 04-050971-FC

JOSEPH ALLAN IRISH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 28, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
No. 10-6362.

#### Richard S. Connors, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 975, 131 S. Ct. 493,

178 L. Ed. 2d 312,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7863.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 607 F.3d 504.
No. 10-7157.

#### In re David E. Hill, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1043, 131 S. Ct. 623,

178 L. Ed. 2d 455,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8980.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Noeker, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 893]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated August 10, 2016, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*734The defendant challenges his designation as a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act *(see*Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]) following his conviction upon a plea of guilty to 8 counts of promoting a sexual performance by a child in violation of Penal Law § 263.15 and 21 counts of possessing a sexual performance by a child in violation of Penal Law § 263.16.

The defendant’s contention that the County Court improperly assessed 30 points under risk factor 3 (number of victims) is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not raise this issue at the SORA hearing *(see People v Destio,*145 AD3d 1047, 1048 [2016]). In any event, this contention is without merit *(see People v Gillotti,*23 NY3d 841, 845 [2014]; *People v Nethercott,*119 AD3d 918 [2014]; *People v Brown,*116 AD3d 1017 [2014]). Further, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court properly assessed 20 points under risk factor 7 (relationship with victim) *(see People v Gillotti,*23 NY3d at 854; *People v Johnson,*11 NY3d 416, 418-420 [2008]; *People v Nethercott,*119 AD3d 918 [2014]; *People v Brown,*116 AD3d 1017 [2014]).

The defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a downward departure is unpreserved for appellate review because he did not request a downward departure from his presumptive designation as a level two sex offender during the SORA hearing *(see People v Sweat,*147 AD3d 802, 802 [2017]). In any event, this contention is without merit *(see id.).*

Dillon, J.P., Cohen, Connolly and Christopher, JJ., concur.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2331

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend or make permanent certain

authorities and requirements under that title.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 28 (legislative day, JULY 20), 1994

Mr. ROCKEFELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend or make

permanent certain authorities and requirements under

that title.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR WAIVER OF

4 REDUCTION OF RETIREMENT PAY FOR REG5 ISTERED-NURSE POSITIONS.

6 Section 7426(c) of title 38, United States Code, is

7 amended by striking out the second sentence.
2

•S 2331 IS

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT REQUIREMENT FOR REVIEW OF

2 AGREEMENTS FOR SPECIAL PAY FOR PHYSI3 CIANS AND DENTISTS.

4 Section 7432(d) of title 38, United States Code, is

5 amended by striking out paragraph (4).

6 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO

7 ENHANCED-USE LEASES.

8 Section 8169 of title 38, United States Code, is

9 amended by striking out ‘‘December 31, 1994’’ and insert10 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘December 31, 1996’’.

Æ
# C_2015262EN.01001902.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 June 2015 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-527/13) (1)

1

((State aid - Milk levy - Aid granted by Italy to milk producers - Aid scheme linked to the reimbursement of the milk levy - Conditional decision - Failure to comply with a condition which allowed the aid to be considered compatible with the internal market - De minimis aid - Existing aid - New aid - Alteration to existing aid - Procedure for reviewing State aid - Obligation to state reasons - Burden of proof))

(2015/C 262/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, assisted by S. Fiorentino and P. Grasso, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Grespan, D. Nardi and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2013/665/EU of 17 July 2013 on the aid scheme SA.33726 (11/C) (ex SA.33726 (11/NN)) granted by Italy (deferral of payment of the milk levy) (OJ 2013 L 309, p. 40).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 1(2) of Commission Decision 2013/665/EU of 17 July 2013 on the aid scheme SA.33726 (11/C) (ex SA.33726 (11/NN)) granted by Italy (deferral of payment of the milk levy); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 1(2) of Commission Decision 2013/665/EU of 17 July 2013 on the aid scheme SA.33726 (11/C) (ex SA.33726 (11/NN)) granted by Italy (deferral of payment of the milk levy);

| 2. | Annuls Articles 2 and 4 of that decision in so far as they concern, first, the aid scheme covered by Article 1(2) and, secondly, the individual aid granted pursuant to that aid scheme; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Articles 2 and 4 of that decision in so far as they concern, first, the aid scheme covered by Article 1(2) and, secondly, the individual aid granted pursuant to that aid scheme;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders the Italian Republic and the Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Italian Republic and the Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.

1

---
Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
															Search

		Submit





Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate





Genital HPV – The FactsEspañol (Spanish)										Related Pages
										HPV the facts page 1
								HPV the facts page 2
								HPV the facts page 3
								HPV the facts page 4Easy Print 4-page PDF (81⁄2X11)pdf icon
*Genital HPV – The Facts* is also available in Spanish
See all brochures from this series.
Return to Genital HPV
							
					
						Page last reviewed:  February 13, 2017					Content source: 	Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
Facts & Brochures
HPV Fact Sheet
HPV & Men Fact Sheet
Vaccine Information for Young Women
Statistics
Treatment and Care
Archive


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue