alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Susquehanna installation hosts Depot Women’s Club

/ Published July 28, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Members and friends of Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna’s Depot Women’s Club visited Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Susquehanna, Pa., on July 17 to discuss the history and mission of both the club and the installation.

The agenda included a historical overview of how the installation transformed from a World War I U.S. Army Reserve depot into a strategic distribution platform for the Defense Logistics Agency.  Explaining today’s missions and achievements was the division chief for the Eastern Distribution Center, John Northrup.  He addressed questions about managing resources, accountability and transportation practices in supporting the current warfighter.  

Attendees who had been affiliated with the installation for decades graciously imparted their experiences into the discussion.  Some were veterans or civilian retirees, having held positions including a commanding officer’s administrative assistant, and manager of the Army’s Air Maintenance mission in the 1980’s. One guest shared that he had been processed through the New Cumberland Army Induction Center to serve during World War II, as did 500,000 fellow Pennsylvanians.  

Following the overviews, the group toured the Department of Defense’s largest distribution processing facility, including receiving operations, the high-rise storage and retrieval system, and the air line of communication pallet build area. 

One of their longest standing members, Rosemary Kline, joined the Depot Women’s Club in 1973.  She has held the position of club president for the past eight years, a service she has performed several times since 1989. Kline was impressed with the automation and the vastness of the DLA facility.  “I was amazed specifically by the high-rise operations and at how the system was able to deliver items to the appropriate consolidation chute.”

Kline has remained active with the club because she believes it is time well spent.  “It serves a purpose: the installation has given me much and I enjoy being able to give back.  For example, the Club has presented over $100,000 in scholarships to children of local military and civilians by managing a Thrift Shop,” she says.  The Thrift Shop is no longer in operation, but still supports worthy causes, such as the New Cumberland Public Library. 

The Depot Women’s Club has been affiliated with DLA’s Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna since it began as an Officer’s Wives Club in 1963.  Few clubs with similar roots have endured into the 21st century, as most did not survive the closing of a military officer’s club to which they had been associated.  It’s a testament to this Depot Women’s Club’s dedication to their mission, community and each other that they have continued this military tradition in New Cumberland, Pa.
# L_2011173EN.01000801.xml

| 1.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 173/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 173/8

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 June 2011

appointing the President of the European Central Bank

(2011/386/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 283(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 11.2 thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the Council of the European Union (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of the President of the European Central Bank, Mr Jean-Claude TRICHET, appointed by Decision of 16 October 2003 (4), expires on 31 October 2011 and it is therefore necessary to appoint a new President of the European Central Bank. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of the President of the European Central Bank, Mr Jean-Claude TRICHET, appointed by Decision of 16 October 2003 (4), expires on 31 October 2011 and it is therefore necessary to appoint a new President of the European Central Bank.

| (2) | The European Council wishes to appoint Mr Mario DRAGHI who, in its view, meets all the requirements set out in Article 283(2) of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The European Council wishes to appoint Mr Mario DRAGHI who, in its view, meets all the requirements set out in Article 283(2) of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Mario DRAGHI is hereby appointed President of the European Central Bank for a term of office of 8 years as from 1 November 2011.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 24 June 2011.

For the European Council

The President

H. VAN ROMPUY

---

(1)  
  OJ L 150, 9.6.2011, p. 8.

1

(2)  Opinion delivered on 23 June 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

2

(3)  
  OJ C 182, 23.6.2011, p. 6.

3

(4)  Decision taken by common accord, at the level of Heads of State or Government, by the Governments of the Member States having the euro as their currency of 16 October 2003 appointing the President of the European Central Bank (OJ L 277, 28.10.2003, p. 16).

4

---
No. 10-5600.

#### Juan Valdez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 930, 131 S. Ct. 325,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7161.

178 L. Ed. 2d 211,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 08-1438.

#### Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III, Petitioner v. Texas, et al.

562 U.S. 980, 131 S. Ct. 442,

178 L. Ed. 2d 320,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8137.

October 18, 2010.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Opinion issued October 11 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 16
- 00413
- CV

——————————— KENNETH HANNA JUNIOR , Appella nt

V. GONZALEZ WALL SYSTEM S AND SHAHMORADI & ASSOCIA TES, INC. , Appell e e s
On Appeal from the 10th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 14
- CV
- 1315

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Kenneth Hanna Junior and appellee Gonzalez Wall Systems have filed an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal. No opinion has issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot

.2 PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale , and Lloyd.
# DLA Aviation employees remember 9/11: Juan Carlos Gachet

/ Published Sept. 11, 2021
Richmond, Va., 
*In commemoration of the 20th anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Public Affairs Office is running a week-long series Sept. 6-11 telling the stories of DLA Aviation employees who remember where they were and what they were doing that fateful day.*

**Name:** Juan Carlos Gachet

**Organization:** DLA Aviation, Richmond, Virginia

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?** I’m a contract specialist. I work with the Electronic Business Enterprise system to manage long-term contracts, to develop acquisition strategy involving previous history, market conditions and specifications or technical data packages and to review sourcing strategy recommendations, determine contract type, method of solicitation, options determination, and sources to be solicited, and to create supporting documentation for solicitation.

**Please tell where you were and what you were doing on Sept. 11, 2001.** I was stationed at Fort Hood, Texas, at the time and we were in company accountability formation when the first sergeant informed us that there had been an attack going on in our soil on the East Coast. The company conducted physical training and I drove home to pick up a few things and eat breakfast. When I got home, all the national media outlets were broadcasting the unfolding events of New York City where the first plane had crashed into one of the twin towers of the World Trade Center. Immediately afterwards, Fort Hood was placed on locked down and military police were posted at all entrances checking ID cards. Needless to say, getting back on base that day was tough. The line of cars trying to get on base was very long. As soon as I finally got back to the company for the second accountability formation, we were put on alert status. Our lives changed forever after that day.

**What can we do to ensure future generations never forget that fateful day?** Tell our experiences to our kids, grandkids and future generations of that fateful day that many people died in New York City, Pennsylvania, and the Pentagon. We had to deploy to Afghanistan and Iraq for the War on Terror and many of our soldiers paid the ultimate sacrifice for our freedom. We will never forget our fallen!
Employee Spotlight: Robert Montgomery
 
  **Employee Spotlight: Robert Montgomery** **Property Disposal Specialist 
DLA Disposition Services at Norfolk, Virginia** **Tell me a little about yourself**. My hometown is Seattle, Washington, but I am in Virginia now. My wife and I have been married for 15 years now, we have a 14-year-old and a child on the way. We have two dogs. I love to hunt and fish. I have a track car that I take out to Virginia International Raceway a couple times a year and have fun. Robert Montgomery is a property disposal specialist stationed at
DLA Disposition Services Norfolk.




Robert Montgomery stands outside wearing an orange safety vest.
        Robert Montgomery
            Robert Montgomery is a property disposal specialist stationed at
DLA Disposition Services Norfolk.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Jeff Landenberger
                    
                    VIRIN: 220921-D-YU183-016 **What types of books to you read?** I like books that gravitate around theoretical physics. **What was your first job with DLA?**  Material identifier and examiner. **Have you deployed with DLA Disposition Services?** Not yet, but that is why I am in this class. **What brought you to Battle Creek, Michigan?** The class I am in is a requirement for expeditionary civilians. **Have you taken other classes here?** Yes, I have taken the [Demilitarization] class with Mr. Zimmerman, front end loader class, and EWOC (Expeditionary Workforce Operations Course). **Where do you see yourself in five years?** In a supervisor position with DLA Disposition Services. **Who is your Superbowl pick?** They are not going to win, but the Washington Commanders.
# Aviation Process Excellence policy rolls out

/ Published June 16, 2016
RICHMOND, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation leaders gathered in the Lotts Conference Center June 14 as DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Allan Day signed the DLA Aviation Process Excellence, or APEx, policy officially making APEx the system of choice to be used throughout the organization for process management.

“DLA Aviation will continue to build a culture of process excellence throughout the workforce using APEx,” said Day. “The goal of APEx is simple - to enhance warfighter support by ensuring every member of our organization knows if they are having a good day.

“Having a good day starts with good processes where each person knows what is required to move the readiness needle each day. If our employees lack clarity on what tasks need to be done and when they need to be completed to remain on the readiness critical path, we could be wasting precious effort,” said the general. “Giving your best effort each day on the tasks that matter most is key to having a good day.”

“The next part of having a good day is measuring for performance against the plan. Did we get it all done? If not, why not?” Day asked. “These questions lead to highlighting constraints or gaps in our processes that inhibit maximum effort along the critical path. By leaders at all levels actively removing those constraints or filling the process gaps, we can have an even better day tomorrow,” he stated.

The new policy outlines the responsibilities at all organizational levels within DLA Aviation to execute and maintain APEx.  It also outlines procedures including a training plan; tiered communication to create a constraint removal battle rhythm at all organizational levels; performance management through data analysis and establishing new metrics, if needed, to better understand our business, measure performance and make business decisions; and performance management metrics that will ensure the transparency of goals and objectives for all employees at all levels throughout DLA Aviation.

“APEx is a long-term system of improving the way we do business,” Day said. “As we roll out and implement APEx, we will communicate with the workforce, and make sure our goals are continuously communicated. We will put tools in the hands of DLA Aviation employees, so we can continue to improve upon our processes, resulting in outstanding customer service to our warfighters and our country.”

DLA Aviation employees will learn more about APEx in the coming weeks and months through town halls, written communications, staff meetings and other channels.

“I welcome your feedback,” Day said.  “Let us know what works and ways we can improve our processes even further.”
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 22, 2016

t0615 

# Order

Clerk June 22, 2016

153113

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153113

COA: 328890

Calhoun CC: 2012

- 002654

- FH

JOSEPH EDWARD

- JARED ROTHWELL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2015

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant t o MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

consideration as on leave granted.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33051-33052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


North Carolina State University; Notice of Decision on 
Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 98-020. Applicant: North Carolina State University,

[[Page 33052]]

Raleigh, NC 27695-7212. Instrument: Mini 4-Pocket E-Beam Evaporator, 
Model EGC04. Manufacturer: Oxford Applied Research, United Kingdom. 
Intended Use: See notice at 63 FR 19715, April 21, 1998.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides: (1) four 
pockets for evaporation of four elements and (2) small size for 
mounting on a photo-electron emission microscope. The National 
Institute of Standards and Technology advised May 28, 1998 that (1) 
these capabilities are pertinent to the applicant's intended purpose 
and (2) it knows of no domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument for the applicant's intended 
use.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 98-16102 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10 - K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  229,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,126
<INVENTORY>                                        769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               278,302
<PP&E>                                          46,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 379,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          187,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           498
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   379,238
<SALES>                                      1,233,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,233,707
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,173,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,559
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,055
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43
        


</TABLE>
# 2023 DLA Hall of Fame inductee: Kay Bushman

/ Published May 10, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
*Editor’s Note: This is one of six stories featuring 2023**DLA Hall of Fame**inductees.**An induction ceremony will be held 2 p.m. May 18 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex auditorium at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. The ceremony is open to all DLA employees; invitations are not needed.*

A solution-oriented attitude defines why Kay Bushman is a member of the 2023 Defense Logistics Agency Hall of Fame.

Bushman’s 31-year legal career with DLA Energy culminated with her role as senior counsel for the organization. Her “let’s figure out how we can do this” approach to problem solving influenced her colleagues and work with DLA Energy, according to her nomination package.

She applied that mindset in 2010 when instability in Kyrgyzstan threatened mission failure at the Manas Transit Center, the major air refueling hub for U.S. forces in Afghanistan. With less than 24 hours’ notice, Bushman was one of three DLA Energy employees who joined a team of Defense Department and embassy officials who flew to Kyrgyzstan to reach an agreement.

Bushman masterfully negotiated with the nation’s new government, according to the nomination.

“Her fuel acquisition background and technical expertise were invaluable,” the nomination package noted. “Thanks to Ms. Bushman’s sound judgment and knowledge of the intricacies of international law, the negotiations were successful. The DLA Energy contractor was allowed unimpeded access to the fuel they had stored throughout the country and could deliver it to the transit center, thus avoiding mission failure.”

Support to long-term contracting, bulk fuel storage contracts, and legislative proposals to amend laws authorizing long-term fuel storage contracts were central to Bushman’s contributions to DLA Energy.

Bushman was also involved in alternative fuels. She advised senior leaders and the acquisition workforce on the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and issues related to alternative energy, including synthetic fuels. Later, Bushman was part of a team that supported the Navy’s Farm-to-Fleet initiative allowing DOD to purchase biofuels at the same cost as conventional bulk fuel.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00080

- CR

The State of Texas
v. Justin Sirucek

On Appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 20FC

- 1246C

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED
and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
January 27 , 2022
#### In the Matter of Christina M.A.R. Heartshare St. Vincent's Services, Respondent; Megan M.R., Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 660]

Appeal by the mother from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Alan Beckoff, J.), entered August 10, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a dispositional hearing, terminated the mother’s parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding to terminate the mother’s parental rights to the subject child on the ground, inter alia, of permanent neglect. Following fact-finding and dispositional hearings, the Family Court found that the mother permanently neglected the child, terminated the mother’s parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption. The mother appeals.

*691The Family Court properly determined that termination of the mother’s parental rights was in the child’s best interests *(see*Family Ct Act § 631). Contrary to the mother’s contention, the entry of a suspended judgment was not appropriate in light of, inter alia, her continued lack of insight into her problems, and her failure to acknowledge and address the issues preventing the return of the child to her care *(see Matter of Shaquan D.M. [Shaquanna M.],*150 AD3d 1119, 1120 [2017]; *Matter of Stephon B.M. [Barry J.M.],*149 AD3d 1080, 1081 [2017]; *Matter of Hector V.P. [Mariana V.],*146 AD3d 889, 890 [2017]; *Matter of Lasuree A.B. [Carla S.B.],*141 AD3d 578, 579 [2016]; *Matter of Joshua E.R. [Yolaine R.],*123 AD3d 723, 726 [2014]; *Matter of Chanel C. [Vanessa N.],*118 AD3d 826, 828-829 [2014]).

Rivera, J.R, Hall, Roman and Christopher, JJ., concur.