alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Leadership Reflection: Mark Miskin

/ Published March 28, 2022

                DLA Disposition Services Grafenwoehr Area Manager Mark Miskin.                            220302-D-D0441-1240                            DLA Disposition Services Grafenwoehr Area Manager Mark Miskin.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Courtesy photoVIRIN: 220302-D-D0441-1240**What’s your role?**

Area manager for the Grafenwoehr, Germany, area of operations. Provide training and development for a great staff to ensure DLA Disposition Services continues to provide world-class troop support [throughout] South-East Germany, to include rotational forces operating in Eastern Europe.

**How long have you worked for the federal government, including military service?**

25 years.

**How long have you worked for DLA Disposition Services?**

12 Years.

**What do you like about your role?**

I like having a sensible impact on the way we operate and overcoming the challenges we face each day.

**Any good advice you’ve received worth sharing?**

I have been given a lot of advice over the years both directly and indirectly. One thing that has really stuck with me through my time with DLA was a quote from [former director] Ms. [Twila] Gonzales around 2009. I cannot recall the exact phrase, but it was something like this: “Always find a way to improve your environment.” Everything I’ve looked at since has challenged me to find ways to improve the operation in one way or another.

**Any favorite DLA memories?**

I really enjoyed my days as a disposal services representative while at Eglin Air Force Base. The troops were ALWAYS so excited when I would arrive on site to provide hands-on instruction. The relationships built with the troops during these times were very fulfilling, as I could see the spark in their eyes as they learned something new.

**What is one characteristic that you believe every leader should possess?**

Patience. Listen before speaking.

**Do you have a leadership philosophy?**

I believe in taking care of my team. I believe troop support improves when my team is happy. Teach the team what is expected of them, listen to their ideas, and back them up.

**Biggest challenge right now?**

Keeping everyone motivated as we creep into the third year of COVID lockdowns.

**Thoughts on success?**

Some of the most successful people I know are effective because they are always sacrificing themselves for the team.

**Any good recent books or other reads?**

Just finished Schindler’s List. 

**What did you want to be when you grew up?**

I always wanted to be an architect. I spent a lot of my youth working at my uncle’s construction sites and have always loved architecture.

_______________________________________________________________________

DLA Disposition Services is celebrating its 50th Anniversary by reflecting on its mission, culture, and workforce. This series is highlighting leadership and employees throughout the agency, across the globe. Visit the historical page to learn more about the MSC and its history.
MDE 

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

1800 Washington Boulevard. Baltimore MD 21230 

410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101 

Martin O'Malley 

Governor 

Anthony G. Brown 

Lieutenant Governor 

Donald S. Welsh 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 3 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Dear Mr. Welsh: 

JUN - 42007 

Shari T. Wilson 

Secretary 

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. 

Deputy Secretary 

The purpose of this letter is to submit copies of the Cecil County, Maryland 8-Hour Ozone State 

Implementation Plan and Base Year Inventory (SIP# 07-05). This air quality plan shows how Cecil 

County, Maryland expects to meet the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). 

A public hearing for this submission was held in Elkton, Maryland on May 24, 2007. All required 

administrative procedures were followed throughout the hearing process. If you have any questions 

concerning these submissions, please feel free to call George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director of the Air and 

Radiation Management Administration at (410) 537-3255. 

Very truly yours, 

Shari T. Wilson 

Secretary 

Enclosures 

cc: Judy Katz, Director, Air Protection Division, EPA Region III 

George (Tad) Aburn, Jr. , Director, Air and Radiation Management Administration, MDE 

Diane Franks, Program Manager, Air Quality Planning, MDE 

Brian Hug, Deputy Program Manager, Air Quality Planning, MDE 

~ Recycled Paper www.mde.state.md.us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 

Via Maryland Relay Service
No. 10-5715.

#### Rene Urena Gonzalez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 935, 131 S. Ct. 338,

178 L. Ed. 2d 220,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7589.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. D-2520.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Murray Leonard Deutchman.

562 U.S. 811, 131 S. Ct. 401,

178 L. Ed. 2d 266,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7542.

October 4, 2010.

Murray Leonard Deut-chman, of Rockville, Maryland, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
# C_2013274EN.01000302.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim (Germany) lodged on 25 June 2013 — Erich Pickert v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-347/13)

2013/C 274/06

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Erich Pickert

Applicant:

Defendant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) relate directly to the booked flight? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) relate directly to the booked flight?

1

| 2. | If the first question is to be answered in the negative, how many earlier flights involving the aircraft to be used for the scheduled flight are relevant to the existence of an extraordinary circumstance? Is there a time-limit to the consideration of extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights? If so, how is that time-limit to be calculated? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is to be answered in the negative, how many earlier flights involving the aircraft to be used for the scheduled flight are relevant to the existence of an extraordinary circumstance? Is there a time-limit to the consideration of extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights? If so, how is that time-limit to be calculated?

| 3. | If extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights are also relevant to a later flight, must the reasonable measures to be taken by the operating air carrier, in accordance with Article 5(3) of the regulation, relate only to preventing the extraordinary circumstance or also to avoiding a long delay? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If extraordinary circumstances which occur during earlier flights are also relevant to a later flight, must the reasonable measures to be taken by the operating air carrier, in accordance with Article 5(3) of the regulation, relate only to preventing the extraordinary circumstance or also to avoiding a long delay?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Emmanuel Vargas, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 906]

— An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Moore, J.), rendered November 25, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Oing and Singh, JJ.
# Aviation team observes SAAPM, other activities set for later in April

/ Published April 12, 2024
RICHMOND, Va., 
Activities promoting the education and prevention of sexual assault are ongoing within the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation community.

Katerina Leverette, Aviation’s sexual assault response coordinator, said the events so far have been valuable in spreading awareness of National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month to the greater Defense Supply Center Richmond team.

“Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention cannot be dwindled to one month, but we use this time to shine a special light on the degree of fortitude it takes to overcome this trauma,” she said. “We celebrate with the survivors and encourage continued healing, all while boosting prevention within our workforce.”

The month started with a SAAPM Resource Fair on April 3 in the headquarters cafeteria and a sponsored fitness class.

The following events are set for later this month:
      - April 17 – L1FT Class, 11:30 a.m. - 12:15, RedBrick Fitness Center
      - April 24 – National Denim Day; employees are recommended to wear denim. National Denim Day gained traction after the Italian Supreme Court overturned a rape conviction because the victim was wearing tight jeans, so she must have helped the person remove them. Communities have recognized various “Denim Days” to raise awareness. More information can be found at  https://denimdayinfo.org .
      - April 24, Annual 5K run/walk, 9 a.m., employees should meet near the gazebo on the DSCR Fitness Trail. An hour of admin leave has been approved for DLA Aviation participants.

DLA has an agency-wide information page for sexual assault awareness and prevention, found at https://www.dla.mil/Info/SAPR/SAAPM/.

Using monthly observances helps remind others about prevention efforts, said Leverette.

“It is important because we want always to create a culture that is proactive on eliminating occurrences of sexual assault within our workforce and give our team the tools needed to overcome trauma and step into the next phases of life confidently,” she said.

For more information about Aviation’s upcoming events or SARC matters, contact Leverette via email at Katrina.Leverette@dla.mil. Additionally, the DLA SAPR Hotline is available at 1-800-841-0937, and the Department of Defense Safe Helpful is available by calling 1-877-995-5247.
P.O. BOX 3086 OSHKOSH, WI 54903-3086 • Tel 920.426.6522 • Fax 920.426.6560 • WWW.EAA.ORG

 

April 30, 2012

DOT Docket Management System

400 7th Street, SW, Room PL 401

Washington, DC 20591

Dear Sirs:

Reference: Fuel Exemption, FAA-2001-9352, Exemption No. 10159

EAA (Experimental Aircraft Association) is the world leader in recreational aviation. With an 

international membership of 170,000 people in more than 112 nations, EAA brings together 

aviation enthusiasts, pilots and aircraft owners who are dedicated to the continued growth of 

aviation, the preservation of its history and a commitment to aviation’s future. EAA programs, 

activities and events are known throughout the world for Preserving the heritage of aviation, 

Promoting access to flight, Protecting the right to fly, Preparing the future of aviation, and of our 

Passion for aviation safety and education.

The International Aerobatic Club (IAC) was formed in 1970 for the purpose of formalizing 

the Experimental Aircraft Association’s (EAA) Precision Flying Division into a true 

membership organization, to write the rules and to set up the corporate structure to promote 

"grass roots" aerobatics. Included within that purpose was to encourage the development of 

the basic skills needed in aerobatic flying through the creation of a "building block" system 

of aerobatic competition categories - what became the Sportsman, Intermediate, Advanced 

and Unlimited levels. These categories remain in place today with a Primary category added 

in the early 1990’s.

This petition for exemption request is being submitted to renew the current exemption, No. 

10159. The conditions and reasons regarding public interest and safety, presented in the original 

petition for Exemption No. 5745 remain unchanged. 

IAC requests this exemption be renewed for a three year period.

If you have any questions, please call the undersigned at 920-426-6574.

Sincerely,

Patricia Deimer-Steineke

Manager, IAC
# C_2014071EN.01000303.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 21 November 2013 — ‘go fair’ Zeitarbeit OHG v Finanzamt Hamburg-Altona

(Case C-594/13)

(2014/C 71/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘go fair’Zeitarbeit OHG

Defendant: Finanzamt Hamburg-Altona

Questions referred

| 1. | On the interpretation of Article 132(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax:






  (a) | Can a Member State exercise the discretion it enjoys in the context of recognising a body as being devoted to social wellbeing in such a way that, while it recognises persons who provide their services to social security funds and care funds, it does not also recognise State-examined care workers who provide their services directly to persons in need of care? |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

On the interpretation of Article 132(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax:

(a)

Can a Member State exercise the discretion it enjoys in the context of recognising a body as being devoted to social wellbeing in such a way that, while it recognises persons who provide their services to social security funds and care funds, it does not also recognise State-examined care workers who provide their services directly to persons in need of care?

| (b) | If State-examined care workers are to be recognised as being devoted to social wellbeing, does the recognition of a temporary work agency which hires out State-examined care workers to recognised care establishments (host establishments) follow from the recognition of the staff hired out? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

If State-examined care workers are to be recognised as being devoted to social wellbeing, does the recognition of a temporary work agency which hires out State-examined care workers to recognised care establishments (host establishments) follow from the recognition of the staff hired out?

| 2. | On the interpretation of Article 134(a) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax:
  Is the supply of State-examined care workers, as a transaction closely linked to welfare and social security work, essential to the provision of care services to the host establishment (user undertaking), if the host establishment cannot operate without staff? |
| --- | --- |

2.

On the interpretation of Article 134(a) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax:

Is the supply of State-examined care workers, as a transaction closely linked to welfare and social security work, essential to the provision of care services to the host establishment (user undertaking), if the host establishment cannot operate without staff?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MSI
HOLDINGS, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      26,001,538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,602,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,797,698
<PP&E>                                      30,021,945
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,582,976
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,556,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,812,419
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       125,596
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,863,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,556,589
<SALES>                                      1,806,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,806,112
<CGS>                                        2,478,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,478,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,878,584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (379,829)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,171,181)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,171,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,171,181)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.66)


</TABLE>
#### JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Respondent, v Ching J. Lu, Also Known as Ching Jung Lu, Appellant, and 408 West 57th Owners Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[64 NYS3d 542]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered on or about September 21, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant Ching J. Lu’s motion, under CPLR 5015 (a), to vacate a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial court’s determination that defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her default was within the court’s sound discretion *(see Gecaj v Gjonaj Realty & Mgt. Corp.,*149 AD3d 600, 602 [1st Dept 2017]). To the extent defendant denies service of the summons and complaint, her general denials are insufficient to rebut the presumption of service created by the detailed, validly executed affidavits of service *(see Slimani v Citibank, N.A.,*47 AD3d 489 [1st Dept 2008]). Defendant’s argument that she relied on assurance from defendant cooperative corporation (the co-op) that her property would be protected and that she need not answer the complaint, is unsupported by any proof and accordingly insufficient *(see Buro Happold Consulting Engrs., PC. v RMJM,*107 AD3d 602 [1st Dept 2013]). Moreover, defendant, who acknowledged she did *552not pay much attention to papers she received by mail, further fails to explain why the co-op would have so assured her. The record before us shows that defendant knew she had defaulted on a loan secured by the property, and that she had received multiple notices from plaintiff of her default, and of its intent to collect the debt, and to foreclose and sell the property at a public auction, if necessary. Under the circumstances, defendant fails to show how her reliance on any alleged assurances from the co-op could have been reasonable *(see Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Dysinger,*149 AD3d 1551 [4th Dept 2017]; *Di Gangi v Schiffgens,*90 AD2d 805 [2d Dept 1982]).

Given the lack of a reasonable excuse for her default, it is not necessary for us to consider whether defendant demonstrated the existence of a meritorious defense *(see Gecaj,*149 AD3d at 607).

Concur—Richter, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Oing and Singh, JJ.
S. 2466

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic Petroleum

Reserve more effectively, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this

Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Policy and Conservation Act

Amendments Act of 1994’’.

TITLE I—ENERGY POLICY AND

CONSERVATION

SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE.

This title may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Policy and Conservation

Act Amendments of 1994’’.

SEC. 102. TITLE I AMENDMENTS.

Part D of title I of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act

is amended in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251), by striking ‘‘September

30, 1994’’ each time it appears and inserting ‘‘June 30, 1996’’.

SEC. 103. TITLE II AMENDMENTS.

Part D of title II of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act

is amended in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285), by striking ‘‘September

30, 1994’’ each time it appears and inserting ‘‘June 30, 1996’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>

                                EATON CORPORATION
                         2006 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
                                   ITEM 15(B)
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

This written statement is submitted in accordance with Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It accompanies Eaton Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 ("10-K Report").

I hereby certify that, based on my knowledge, the 10-K Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C 78m), and information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Eaton Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.


Date: February 28, 2007                 /s/ Richard H. Fearon
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard H. Fearon
                                        Executive Vice President -
                                        Chief Financial and Planning Officer