# i 

# Draft Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5305) 401 M Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20460

February 1996 

# Volume III:

Selection of MACT Standards and Technologies

# ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This document was prepared by the U.S. EPA’s Office of Solid Waste, Waste Management Division. Energy and Environmental Research Corporation (EER) provided technical support under EPA Contract No. 68-D2-0164. Science Applications International Corporation also provided technical support.

# iii ABSTRACT

The EPA is revising air emissions regulations for hazardous waste burning combustors, specifically incinerators, cement kilns, and light weight aggregate kilns. The new emissions standards are being developed using the “maximum achievable control technology” (MACT) approach defined in Title 3 of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. MACT standards are set for the hazardous air pollutants (HAP) of PCDD/PCDF, mercury, semi volatile metals (cadmium and lead), low volatile metals (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, and chromium), total chlorine (considering both HCl and
Cl 2 

# ), CO and hydrocarbons (not strictly HAPs, but used as surrogates for toxic organic HAPs), and PM (again, not itself strictly a HAP, but used as a surrogate for both condensed metals and organics). This volume documents the procedures and results of the MACT floor evaluation. This includes: (1) procedures used to determine the MACT floor levels, (2) specifics of the MACT floor evaluation for each HAP and hazardous waste burning source category for both new and existing sources, (3) beyond-the-floor control techniques applicable to the different HAP and source category combinations, and (4) achievability of the MACT floor levels.

For determining the floor for existing sources, the proposed “6% Floor” procedure is used, which includes the following steps: (1) Stack gas emissions data is ranked by test condition average. Stack gas emissions data from over one hundred trial burn compliance tests are used to determine the MACT standards. Rankings are done separately for each source category and HAP combination; (2) Control techniques used by the best 6% of sources (known as the “MACT pool”) are used to define MACT control. This may include feedrate control as well as add-on air pollution control equipment that is effective for the particular HAP of interest; (3) All source test conditions using MACT (but not necessarily in the top 6% of the emissions rankings) are identified as part of the “MACT expanded universe”; (4) The entire MACT expanded universe of conditions (facilities using MACT control) is statistically evaluated to determine a floor level that is achievable on a day-to-day basis by all facilities using MACT. This is determined statistically, based on the highest emitting source in the MACT expanded universe with the consideration of variability at the 99 th 

# percentile. MACT floor levels for new sources are determined in a similar manner, except MACT control is define by that used by the best performing facility.

Beyond-the-floor control techniques are also evaluated. Beyond-the-floor controls are controls which are able to achieve emission levels lower than the existing source floor levels. Beyond-the-floor control techniques for each of the source categories and each HAP are discussed, including a the applicability to each of the source categories and an evaluation of achievable levels using the beyond-the-floor control techniques for the particular HAP.

The achievability of the MACT floor levels is evaluated, especially related to the feasibility of the simultaneous achievability of all HAP floor levels, as well as the influence of conventional fuels and raw materials contributions to stack gas emissions levels.

# iv TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi

1.0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1

2.0 Floor Determination Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Existing Source Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Consideration of Purely Statistical Approach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Combined Technology and Statistical Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2
Rank Emissions Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2
Screen Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4 Select Best Performing MACT Pool . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-5
Define MACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-6 Identify “MACT Expanded Universe” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-7 Evaluate MACT Expanded Universe to Determine Floor . . . . 2-8
New Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-8

3.0 Existing Source Floor Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
PCDD/PCDF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-5
Particulate Matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-5
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-5
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6 Mercury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-7
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-7
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-8 Semi-Volatile Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-9 Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-9 Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-9 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-10
Low-Volatile Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-10
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-10
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-11 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-11 Total Chlorine (HCl + Cl 2 

# ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-12
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-12
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-12 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-13 Trace Organics Surrogates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-13
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-13 Hydrocarbons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-13
Carbon Monoxide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-14
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-15
Main Stack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-15 Hydrocarbons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-16

# v Carbon Monoxide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-16 Bypass3-16 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-17 Hydrocarbons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-17
Carbon Monoxide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-17 Summary of Existing Source Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-18 Plots of Envire Universe and MACT Expanded Universes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-18

4.0 New Source Floor Determinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
PCDD/PCDF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3
Particulate Matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3
Cement kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3 Light weight aggregate kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4 Mercury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
Cement kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4 Light weight aggregate kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Semi-Volatile Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Cement kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5 Light weight aggregate kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
Low-Volatile Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
Cement kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6 Light weight aggregate kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7 Total Chlorine (HCl + Cl 2 

# ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7
Cement kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7 Light weight aggregate kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-8 Trace Organic Surrogates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-8 Summary of New Source Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-8

5.0 Beyond-the-Floor Control Options. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
PCDD/PCDF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 Good Operating Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 Carbon Injection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
Carbon Bed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3 Catalytic Oxidation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3
Inhibitors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3
Cement Kilns Carbon Injection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4
Carbon Beds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5 Catalytic Oxidation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5
Inhibitors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5 APCD Temperature Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5 Mercury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6 Carbon Injection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6
Carbon Beds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6

# vi Wet Scrubbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6
Selenium Coated Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7 Sodium Sulfide Injection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7
Particulate Matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-8 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-10
Low-Volatile Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-10
Semi-Volatile Metals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-10 Total Chlorine (HCl + Cl 2 

# ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-10
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-10
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-11 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-12 Hydrocarbons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-12
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-12
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-13 Bypass Stack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-13
Main Stack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-13 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-14
Carbon Monoxide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-14
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-14
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-14 Bypass Stack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-15
Main Stack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-15 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-15

6.0 Floor Achievability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 Simultaneous Achievability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
Incinerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
Cement Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2
Consideration of the Effect of Non-Hazardous Waste Constituents. . . . . . . . . 6-2

References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R-1

Appendices

A. Floor Determinations Using the 12% Floor Procedure .................................................. A-1

B. Original 6% Floor ........................................................................................................... B-1

C. Statistical Analysis Procedure ........................................................................................ C-1

D. Air Pollution Control Device Acronym Listing ............................................................. D-1

E. Facility Name and Location List Corresponding to Three Digit EPA ID Codes ........... E-1

F. Entire Source Category and MACT Floor 6% Expanded MACT Universes Plots by HAP, Source Type, and Condition ID................................................................ F-1

# vii LIST OF FIGURES

3-1 PCDD/PCDF TEQ, incinerators, MACT pool and expanded universe, existing sources, 6% MACT floor analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-76 3-2 PCDD/PCDF TEQ, cement kilns, MACT pool and expanded universe, existing sources, 6% MACT floor analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-77 3-3 HC (run average), incinerators, entire universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-78 3-4 HC (maximum hourly rolling average), incinerators, entire universe . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-79 3-5 CO (run average), incinerators, entire universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-80 3-6 HC (run average), cement kiln bypass, entire universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-82 3-7 HC (maximum hourly rolling average), cement kiln bypass, entire universe . . . . . . 3-83 3-8 CO (run average), cement kiln bypass, entire universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-84 3-9 CO (maximum hourly rolling average), cement kiln bypass, entire universe . . . . . . 3-85 3-10 HC (run average), LWAKs, entire universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-86 3-11 HC (maximum hourly rolling average), LWAKs, entire universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-87 3-12 CO (run average), LWAKs, entire universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-88 3-13 CO (maximum hourly rolling average), LWAKs, entire universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-89

5-1 Mercury control with carbon injection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5-16 5-2 Mercury control with carbon injection from Stanislaus Co. MWC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-17 5-3 Mercury control with carbon injection from Camden Co. MWC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-18 5-4 Mercury control with carbon injection from Camden Co. MWC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-19 5-5 Mercury control with carbon injection (Joy/Niro Sorbalit data) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-20

6-1 Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, mercury, cement kilns, 6% Floor Analysis, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7
6-2 Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, SVM, cement kilns, 6% Floor Analysis, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8
6-3 Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, LVM, cement kilns, 6% Floor Analysis, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-9
6-4 Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, total chlorine, cement kilns, 6% Floor Analysis, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-10 6-5 Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, mercury, LWAKs, 6% Floor Analysis, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-11
6-6 Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, SVM, LWAKs, 6% Floor Analysis, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-12
6-7 Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, LVM, LWAKs, 6% Floor Analysis, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-13
6-8 Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, total chlorine, LWAKs, 6% Floor Analysis, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-14

6-9 Penetration vs maximum theoretical emission concentration for
6% database MACT add-on control data (SVM; Cement Kilns) . . . . . . . . . . 6-15

# viii 6-10 Penetration vs maximum theoretical emission concentration for
6% database MACT add-on control data (SVM; LWA Kilns) . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-16

6-11 Penetration vs maximum theoretical emission concentration for 6% database MACT add-on control data (LVM; Cement Kilns) . . . . . . . . . . 6-17

6-12 Penetration vs maximum theoretical emission concentration for
6% database MACT add-on control data (LVM; LWA Kilns) . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-18

# ix LIST OF TABLES

3-1 PCDD/PCDF TEQ, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . 3-19 3-2 PCDD/PCDF TEQ, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . 3-21 3-3 PM, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-23 3-4 PM, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-29 3-5 PM, LWAKs, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-31 3-6 Mercury, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-32 3-7 Mercury, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . 3-34 3-8 Mercury, LWAKs, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-35 3-9 SVM, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-36 3-10 SVM, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-39 3-11 SVM, LWAKs, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-41 3-12 LVM, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-42 3-13 LVM, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-45 3-14 LVM, LWAKs, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-47 3-15 Total Chlorine, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis. . . . . . . . 3-48 3-16 Total Chlorine, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . 3-53 3-17 Total Chlorine, LWAKs, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . 3-55 3-18 HC (RA), Incinerators, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-56 3-19 HC (MHRA), Incinerators, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis. . . . . . . . . 3-58 3-20 CO (RA), Incinerators, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-59 3-21 CO (MHRA), Incinerators, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis. . . . . . . . . 3-62 3-22 HC (RA), Cement Kilns Main Stack, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . 3-63
3-23 HC (MHRA), Cement Kilns Main Stack, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-64 3-24 CO (RA), Cement Kilns Main Stack, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . 3-65
3-25 CO (MHRA), Cement Kilns Main Stack, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-67 3-26 HC (RA), Cement Kilns Bypass Stack, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis3-68 3-27 HC (MHRA), Cement Kilns Bypass Stack, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-69 3-28 CO (RA), Cement Kilns Bypass Stack, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis3-70 3-29 CO (MHRA), Cement Kilns Bypass Stack, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-71 3-30 HC (RA), LWAKs, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-72 3-31 HC (MHRA), LWAKs, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-73 3-32 CO (RA), LWAKs, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-74 3-33 CO (MHRA), LWAKs, Existing Sources, 6% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . 3-75a 3-34 Summary of MACT Floor Levels for 6% MACT Floor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-75b

4-1 PCDD/PCDF TEQ, Incinerators, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-9 4-2 PCDD/PCDF TEQ, Cement Kilns, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . 4-10 4-3 PM, Incinerators, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-13

# x 4-4 PM, Cement Kilns, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-19 4-5 PM, LWAKs, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-21 4-6 Mercury, Incinerators, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-22 4-7 Mercury, Cement Kilns, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-24 4-8 Mercury, LWAKs, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-25 4-9 SVM, Incinerators, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-26 4-10 SVM, Cement Kilns, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-29 4-11 SVM, LWAKs, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-31 4-12 LVM, Incinerators, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-32 4-13 LVM, Cement Kilns, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-35 4-14 LVM, LWAKs, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-37 4-15 Total Chlorine, Incinerators, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-38 4-16 Total Chlorine, Cement Kilns, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-43 4-17 Total Chlorine, LWAKs, New Source MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-45 4-18 Summary of MACT Floors for New Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-46

5-1 Activated Carbon Injection PCDD/PCDF Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-21

5-2 Activated Carbon Bed PCDD/PCDF Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-24 5-3 Hazardous Waste Burning Cement Kilns With APCD Temperatures Less Than 400 ° F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-25 5-4 Activated Carbon Mercury Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-26 5-5 Summary of Carbon Injection Performance for Mercury Control on MWCs and MWIs (by Individual Run) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-27

A-1 PCDD/PCDF TEQ, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . A-9 A-2 PCDD/PCDF TEQ, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis A-11 A-3 PM, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-13 A-4 PM, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-19 A-5 PM, LWAKs, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor AnalysisA-21 A-6 Mercury, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . A-22 A-7 Mercury, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . A-24 A-8 Mercury, LWAKs, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-25 A-9 SVM, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-29 A-10 SVM, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . A-31 A-11 SVM, LWAKs, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-32 A-12 LVM, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-33 A-13 LVM, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . A-35 A-14 LVM, LWAKs, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-37 A-15 Total Chlorine, Incinerators, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis. . . . . . A-38 A-16 Total Chlorine, Cement Kilns, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . A-43 A-17 Total Chlorine, LWAKs, Existing Sources, 12% MACT Floor Analysis . . . . . . . . . A-45 A-18 Summary of 12% MACT Floors For Existing Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-46

# xi ACRONYMS

A/C Air-to-cloth ratio; used for describing fabric filter design; defined as the fabric

cloth area divided by the flue gas flow rate through the fabric filter; use for defining MACT for fabric filters

ACI Activated carbon injection; activated carbon is used for both mercury and

organics (including PCDD/PCDF control)

APCD Air pollution control device

APCS Air pollution control system

ASTM American Society of Testing and Materials

BIF Boilers and Industrial Furnaces

B-T-F Beyond the floor

CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments

CEM Continuous emissions monitoring system; flue gas emissions monitoring

systems that can provided continuous real-time analysis on-line; for monitoring HAPs such as PM, Hg, CO, HC, etc.

CETRED Combustion Emissions Technical Resource Document

CK Cement kiln

CKD Cement kiln dust

CMS Continuous monitoring system

CO Carbon monoxide

CPT Comprehensive performance test

CST Combined statistical and technology based MACT floor procedure; used in
the

preferred 6% (and alternative 12%) floor procedure

DL Detection limit

D/O/M Design, operating, and maintenance procedures

DRE Destruction and removal efficiency

dscf Dry standard cubic feet

dscm Dry standard cubic meter

EER Energy and Environmental Research Corporation

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

ESP Electrostatic precipitator

EU MACT expanded universe

FF Fabric filter (baghouse)

FID Flame ionization detector

GCP Good combustion practices

# xii GOP Good operating practices

g Gram

gr Grain (7000 grains per pound)

HAP Hazardous air pollutant

HC Hydrocarbons

HCl Hydrogen chloride gas

Hg Mercury

HW Hazardous waste

HWC Hazardous waste combustor

HWI Hazardous waste incinerator

IWS Ionizing wet scrubber

LVM Low volatile metals

LWAK Light weight aggregate kiln

MACT Maximum achievable control technology

MB Mass balance

MHRA Maximum hourly rolling average

MTEC Maximum theoretical emissions concentration

MWC Municipal waste combustor

MWI Medical waste incinerator

PCB Polychlorinated biphenyls

PCDD/PCDF Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans

PIC Products of incomplete combustion

PM Particulate matter

POHC Principal organic hazardous constituent

ppmv Parts per million by volume in gas

RA Run average

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

SCA Specific collection area

SRE System removal efficiency

SVM Semi volatile metals

TEQ Toxic equivalent

VS Venturi scrubber

WHB Waste heat boiler

WS Wet scrubber

# 1-1 SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates the burning of hazardous waste in incinerators under 40 CFR Part 264/265, Subpart O, and in industrial furnaces under 40 CFR Part 266, Subpart H. The Agency is proposing revised regulations applicable to these hazardous waste combustion (HWC) devices. This document provides technical background for the MACT floor and beyond-the-floor emissions standards that are considered for the proposed rule. It is the third in a series of seven volumes of technical background documents for the rule. These include:

Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume I: Description of Source Categories , which provides process descriptions of major design and operating features including different process types and air pollution control devices currently in use and potentially applicable to various combustion source categories; description of air pollution control devices including design principles, performance and operating efficiency, process monitoring options, and upgrade/retrofit options; and major source determination for all sources including a discussion on the methodology used to estimate annual emissions, assumptions used, and an emissions summary for each source listing each HAP.

Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume II: HWC Emissions

Data Base , which contains a summary of the emissions information on toxic metals, particulate matter (PM), HCl and Cl 2 

# , hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, semi-volatile and volatile organic compounds, and dioxins/furans from HWCs. Other detailed information encompassed in the data summary include company name and location, emitting process information, combustor design and operation information, APCD design and operation information, stack conditions during testing, feed stream feed rates, and emissions rates of HAPs by test condition.

Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume III: Selection of Proposed MACT Standards and Technologies , which identifies the MACT floor for each HAP and source category for existing sources and new sources and discusses the approach used to define the floor and beyond-the-floor alternatives considered for the proposed rule.

Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume IV: Compliance with the Proposed HWC Standards , which contains detailed discussions of continuous emissions monitors and operating limits for the proposed rule.

# 1-2 Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume V: Engineering Costs, which contains the cost estimates for APCD requirements for existing and new facilities to meet the proposed emissions standards.

Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume VI: Development of Comparable Fuels Specifications, which summarizes the composition including hazardous species in benchmark fossil fuels such as gasoline, #2 fuel oil, #4 fuel oil, and #6 fuel oil. This information is being used to develop specifications which EPA is considering to allow comparable fuels to be excluded from the definition of hazardous waste.

Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume VII: Miscellaneous
Technical Issues, which provides additional information on several topics such as the treatment of measurements below analytical detection limits, the procedures for handling missing data, and the rationale for grouping metals of similar volatility. The impact of these methodologies on the proposed MACT limits, the cost estimates, and the national emissions

estimates are also discussed.

The MACT emission standards are being proposed for three types of hazardous waste

combustion facilities:

• Cement Kilns • Lightweight Aggregate Kilns • Incinerators (On-site and Commercial)

The hazardous air pollutants for which emission standards are proposed are:

• Mercury (Hg) • Low Volatility Metals (LVM) • Semi-Volatile Metals (SVM) • Particulate Matter (PM) • Hydrogen Chloride and Chlorine as Total Chlorine (HCl/Cl 2 

# ) • Carbon Monoxide (CO) • Hydrocarbons (HC) • Dioxins/Furans (PCDD/PCDF)

These emission standards are being developed through the “maximum achievable control technology” (MACT) approach defined in Title 3 of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). In this approach the MACT floor standard for existing facilities is established at the level of the average performance of the best 12% of existing sources. Depending on cost effectiveness, more stringent, but technically achievable, beyond-the-floor standards for specific HAPs are considered.

The proposed floor and beyond-the-floor standards have been selected based on a database (described in Volume II) of trial burn and compliance test emissions measurements from 77 incinerators, 35 cement kilns, and 12 lightweight aggregate kilns. The MACT floor has been

# 1-3 identified as the log mean plus a variability factor of the source with the highest emissions (based on the arithmetic average) of those sources using emission control used by sources emitting the HAP or HAP surrogate at below a level of the median of the best performing 12% of sources (or top 5 if there are fewer than 30 sources). These sources are called the expanded MACT pool. The variability is a measure of the average variability among runs for those test conditions from sources in the expanded MACT pool. This is called the “6% Floor” and is the one ultimately selected for the proposed rule. It was selected because it ensures that all facilities with the MACT control can

meet the MACT floor.

An alternative approach discussed in the preamble to the proposed rule is the “12% Floor”. It is based on the interpretation that the CAAA requirement of meeting the average performance of the best 12% means the day-to-day performance achievable by the average source having the technologies represented by the top 12% of sources. It was not selected for proposal because not all sources having the MACT technology can meet this floor. That is, although the MACT floor control would be the set of controls used by the best performing 12% of sources, many of those sources are not achieving the average emissions level of the sources.

In addition to existing sources, MACT standards are also identified for new sources that begin burning hazardous waste after the proposed regulation is in place. Analysis of the MACT floors for these “new sources” is also provided.

This report describes in detail the procedure and rationale that was used to set the MACT stack gas emissions standards levels. It consists of sections, including:

Section 2: Describes the procedure used to determine the MACT floor for existing sources (using the “6% Floor” approach) and for new sources.

Section 3: Documents the MACT floor for existing sources using the “6% Floor” procedure.

Section 4: Documents the MACT floor for new sources.

Section 5: Describes the various techniques that can be used to achieve beyond-the-floor emissions levels, their performance levels, and their applicability to the different hazardous waste burning source categories.

Section 6: Discusses the technical feasibility of simultaneously achieving the proposed floor and beyond-the-floor MACT standards for each source category.

APPENDIX A: Documents the MACT floor and beyond-the-floor levels that are determined using the alternative “12% Floor” approach.

APPENDIX B: Documents an additional floor option for which costs are provided in

Volume V.

# 1-4 APPENDIX C: Discusses in detail the statistical procedure that is used to account for within-test condition emissions variability.

APPENDIX D: Lists air pollution control device acronyms that are used.

APPENDIX E: Lists facility names and locations by EPA ID Number.

APPEDNIX F: Graphical ranking plots of emissions data for all HAPs by condition ID and source category type for all data (“entire universe”) as well as the “6% MACT Floor” expanded universe data set, as determined in Section 3.

# 2-1 SECTION 2

FLOOR DETERMINATION PROCEDURES

The procedure used to determine the MACT floor levels for existing and new sources is described in the following.

2.1 EXISTING SOURCE PROCEDURE

Two alternative procedures were considered for setting MACT floor levels: a purely statistical approach, and a combined technology and statistical approach.

2.1.1 Consideration of Purely Statistical Approach

The preliminary approach that was considered for determining MACT-based emissions levels for particulate matter (PM) and PCDD/PCDF from existing hazardous waste combustors (HWC) is presented in Draft Combustion Emissions Technical Resource Document (CETRED) (U.S. EPA, 1994). The CETRED approach used a statistical procedure to establish “floor” emissions levels. The approach was an attempt to conform with the language of the Clean Air Act Title III amendments. It was a purely statistical approach that focused on the performance of the “best performing MACT facilities”. It involved the following procedures:

• Pool all available test data for the HAP of interest from each separate hazardous waste burning facility. This includes considering flue gas emission data from different test conditions and different test dates from the same facility as one body of data.

• Screen out unrepresentative data. For example, facilities which burn low ash content wastes and fuels or do not use active PM air pollution control devices are not considered for evaluation of the PM floor; facilities which use low chlorine content wastes are removed

from the evaluation of the PCDD/PCDF floor.

• Based on all available test runs, the individual facilities are ranked according to a “combined parameter” which considers both the average emissions level and the intrafacility variability between different test runs from each individual facility. The combined parameter for each facility is calculated as the average of all runs plus twice the standard deviation

based on all test runs.

• Based on the ranking, select the best performing (lowest combined parameter) 12% of sources (or the top 5 there are less than 30 total) as the “MACT pool”.

# 2-2 • Statistically evaluate the MACT pool facilities to identify the MACT floor. The statistical methodology that was considered uses a tolerance limit procedure to determine a level that the “average” MACT pool facility could achieve 99% of the time at a 95% confidence level. The methodology is discussed in detail in CETRED (U.S. EPA, 1994).

In CETRED, MACT floor limits were calculated for both “supersource” categories (where all data from all of the different source categories were considered together) as well as for different individual source category and HAP combinations. CETRED supersource limits for PM and PCDD/ PCDF TEQ were determined to be at 0.005 gr/dscf and 0.2 TEQ ng/dscm, respectively. The CETRED approach was considered briefly for the determination of other HAP floors such as metals, HCl,

Cl 2 

# , CO, and HC. After receiving comments on the CETRED approach, the purely statistical approach that was used in CETRED for determining MACT floor levels, was dropped for the following reasons:

• Achievability of the statistically derived floors is fundamentally incompatible with the intent of MACT. All facilities using MACT must be able to meet the floor. In some cases, facilities using MACT do not happen to fall into the best performing MACT pool. Thus, if the floor level is set based solely on facilities in the MACT pool, then these facilities which use MACT technology and are not in the MACT pool, will not be able to meet the MACT floor.

• In CETRED, it was assumed that the emissions data across source category are “normally” distributed (in a statistical sense, as opposed to lognormally distributed). The assumed distribution type is important since it affects the statistically derived limit. Subsequent analyses on the individual HAPs has shown that for many, the distribution is neither normal nor log-normal. The form of the distribution may be further complicated by the inclusion of diverse control technologies which may have different performance characteristics.

2.1.2 Combined T echnology and Statistical Approach

To address the concerns of the CETRED approach discussed above, a technology approach with a statistical overlay to consider emissions variability is used to determine MACT floor levels. This approach involves a six step analysis procedure consisting of:

• Rank the stack emissions data, • Screen the stack gas emissions data, • Select the best performing MACT pool sources, • Define MACT control, • Identify the MACT expanded universe, and • Statistically evaluate the MACT expanded universe to determine the MACT floor.

2.1.2.1 Rank Emissions Data

In the first step, for each source category, HAP emissions data from different facilities and test conditions are compiled from EPA’s HWC Emissions Database. The database is described in

# 2-3 detail in the accompanying Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume II:

HWC Emissions Data Base . The database contains detailed results of over a one-hundred trial burns and compliance tests from incinerators and cement and light weight aggregate kilns. All data considered are in terms of flue gas concentrations, corrected to 7% O 2 

# and standard conditions; “non-detects” (measurements at the analytical method detection limit) are considered at the full

detection limit.

For each HAP, all individual test conditions are ranked from lowest to highest by the test condition average HAP emissions concentration. When a source has emissions data for a HAP from several different tests conditions, each test condition is considered separately. That is, for each unit that had conducted a series of tests under different operating conditions, data generated under one test condition is not combined with emission data of a completely separate test condition. Each test condition is treated separately since each test condition in conducted using similar waste types and under similar facility operating conditions (such as temperature, waste feedrate, etc.). This is done because it is not appropriate to pool results from widely different test conditions, for example a metals/chlorine test condition and an organics test condition. Individual test condition averages are determined by the average of all runs within a test condition, typically three.

Rankings are done separately for each individual HAP and source category combination. A “supersource” analysis (evaluation of a single HAP for all three source categories simultaneously) was not considered because, although the source categories have the similarity of burning hazardous waste, each has different characteristics and emissions profiles, making a supersource category technically inappropriate.

MACT floor levels are identified for the metals groupings of LVM (consisting of antimony, arsenic, beryllium, and chromium), and SVM (consisting of cadmium and lead), as opposed to standards for each individual metal in the grouping. Also, levels are identified for total chlorine (HCl + Cl 2 

# ). However, for many of the facilities, stack gas emission data are not available for all of the species of the metals volatility group or total chlorine group. For example, many facilities conducted stack gas sampling for chromium during trial burns, while fewer measured the other metals in the LVM group. Likewise, almost all incinerators have HCl measurements (which are required as part of current RCRA compliance), while relatively few have Cl 2 

# gas measurements (which were not required under RCRA). Thus, the analysis may be based on a limited number of conditions if restricted to only consider test run data which had flue gas measurements for all components of the groupings. Instead, all runs are considered that have at a minimum, flue gas measurements for one of the constituents in the group. In these cases, the emissions of the total HAP group for a source is assumed to hold the same ranking (relative to other sources) as the average of the rankings of all measured HAPs within the group. This is accomplished using the following procedure:

• For each of the constituents of the group in question, rank all available flue gas emissions concentrations (by individual test run) for all source categories by emissions level.

# 2-4 • For the constituent(s) which have flue gas measurements, determine the relative positions (percentile rankings) in comparison to all of the other data for that constituent, using the ranking previously determined.

• Determine the average of the individual percentile rankings based on each of the constituents for which flue gas measurement data are available.

• Use the average percentile ranking for flue gas measurement(s) to determine the appropriate values of the missing constituents by selecting the missing constituents at a level that corresponds to the average percentile ranking for the flue gas measurements (e.g., if for SVM, a lead flue gas measurement is available at a 45 th 

# percentile in comparison with all other lead data, then a cadmium value is substituted that corresponds to the 45 th 

# percentile of all cadmium data).

The individual constituents (from both the flue gas measurements, as well as the percentile ranking substituted estimates as described above) are added together to form a group total. Again,

measurements at non-detect levels are considered at the detection limit.

2.1.2.2 Screen Data

The conditions compiled above are “screened” (non-representative conditions are removed from consideration in the following MACT analysis) for a variety of reasons including:

• Conditions where flue gas measurements were reported as “non-detect” at high detection levels. In these cases, the emissions level may be significantly less than that reported. What constitutes “high” is determined in comparison with other measurements and the detection limit that should be routinely achievable considering typical sampling time and analytical limitations.

• Conditions where flue gas sampling and/or analytical testing problems occurred (e.g., high blank, poor recoveries, broken probes, non-isokinetic sampling, and other QA/QC problems).

• Conditions with suspect mass balance or partitioning. In these cases, the feedrate. “maximum theoretical emissions concentration” (MTEC, as described in detail in the following Section 2.1.2.4) and corresponding emissions level does not conform with expected engineering judgement of the behavior of the particular HAP. For example, for mercury, conditions where either the mercury emissions is significantly lower or higher than the input MTEC feedrate are screenout out from the analysis; these conditions have either inexplicably high system removal efficiencies (when the emissions is much lower than the feed) or negative system removal efficiencies (when the emissions are higher than the feedrate). In these cases, suspect mass balance or partitioning is a likely indicator of problems with feedrate MTEC and/or flue gas emissions measurements.

• Conditions which are obvious outliers (low or high) with respect to all other measurements within the source category of interest.

# 2-5 • Conditions where it is believed that the facility was operated with sub-standard design, operation, and/or maintenance (D/O/M) practices. For example, facilities with multiple, but apparently similar, conditions for one HAP, where some conditions are unexplainably dramatically different than others.

• Conditions in the EPA HWC database where facilities were not burning hazardous waste (“baseline” conditions).

• Conditions in which one of the emissions level is higher than current RCRA standard (e.g., conditions with individual run PM measurements higher than 0.08 gr/dscf).

2.1.2.3 Select Best Performing MACT Pool

The second step is to select the best performing sources based on the lowest average condition stack emissions levels from the ranking performed above. These best-performing sources define the “MACT pool”. For the proposed “6% approach” which is discussed in the main part of this document, the MACT pool is comprised of the median (and better) of the best performing 12% of existing sources, which is interpreted to consist of the best performing 6% of sources (or the top 3 sources, if emissions data are available on less than 30 different sources). In determining the total number of emitting sources which the 6% (or top 3) is based on, the following is considered:

• The total number is based on the number of different emitting sources (individual combustion unit emitting processes, e.g, different kilns on the same site would be considered as different units). The total is not based on the number of different conditions (e.g., if an emitting source had measured a particular HAP during multiple test conditions, the source is considered only once when determining the total number of different emitting sources).

• When MTEC (which is described in detail shortly) is used to define the MACT technology, if a source did not have an MTEC feedrate measurement (even though it may have had stack gas emissions concentration measurements), it was ignored when determining the number of total facilities for which data were available).

Additionally, when determining the MACT pool, the following were considered:

• Conditions that define the MACT pool must be from different facility sources. If necessary, next-in-line sources are selected to obtain the required number of different sources for the MACT pool. For example, if the MACT pool is determined to contain 3 sources, and one source had the best performing three conditions, the MACT pool would not contain these three test conditions from the same source. Instead, the next best performing conditions from different facilities would be included in the MACT pool until the required number of

different facilities is reached.

# 2-6 • If any of the facilities in the source category universe use an active air pollution control device for the HAP of interest, then the MACT pool is expanded to contain at a minimum one facility that uses a HAP controlling air pollution control device. For example, for the incinerators chlorine evaluation, some facilities have low chlorine feedrates with no active chlorine control device; but the majority of incinerators use some type of wet or dry scrubbing device for chlorine control. Thus the MACT pool must contain at least one facility which uses wet or dry scrubbing chlorine control. This is to avoid the possibility of defining MACT solely based on MTEC feedrate control, as discussed further below.

2.1.2.4 Define MACT

The best performing MACT pool sources that were determined above are used to define MACT (i.e., control schemes used by the lowest emitting sources). MACT can be defined by one or a combination of the following:

• Air pollution control technology used for the particular HAP. The definition of MACT may be further refined by design, operation, and maintenance features of the particular control technology that affects performance. These include:

— For electrostatic precipitators (ESPs), specific collection area (SCA) is used. Note that as discussed in Technical Support Document Volume I, SCA may have asignificant affect on ESP performance. However, other parameters such as platetoplate spacing, current density, and voltage may also be applicable, but were not used due to lack of comprehensive information on these design specifics from most facilities using ESPs.

— For fabric filters, air-to-cloth ratio (A/C) is used to differentiate between different fabric filter units. Again, other parameters such as cloth type, fabric age, cleaning practices, and pressure drop may also be applicable, but were not used due to lack of information on specific facility fabric filters.

— For wet scrubbers, no design specifics were used; instead MACT was defined by wet scrubber class (i.e., venturi scrubbers, packed bed scrubbers, spray tower scrubbers, etc.). Although pressure drop (for venturi and other high energy scrubbers) as well as liquid-to-gas ratio and packing type and flue gas residence time may be appropriate for certain wet scrubbers, which may varying greatly in design, due to lack of detailed design information, no specific design or operating parameters are used in the MACT analysis to further refine the definition of MACT.

• Feedrate control of the particular HAP, if applicable (i.e., for chlorine and metals). Feedrate is a direct method for controlling emissions for HAPs such as metals and chlorine. Feedrate measurements were required for cement and light weight aggregate kiln compliance tests and some of the more recent incinerator trial burns, and thus they are readily available.

# 2-7 Feedrate measurements are converted to “maximum theoretical emissions concentrations” (MTEC), which is an approach to normalize feedrates across sources with varying waste burning capacities. MTEC is the theoretical flue gas emissions concentration that would occur if all of the feed metal or chlorine partitioned 100% to the stack. For determining MTECs for LVM and SVM metals volatility groupings, individual feedrate components of the groupings were simply added together. Measurements reported below the detection

level were treated as measured at the full detection level. In cases where individual constituent feed measurements were not available, it was assumed they were not present (treated as zero content in the feed). Also, MTECs are based solely on hazardous waste feedrate measurements. They are not based on total feedrate into the system, which may be higher than that of the hazardous waste due to contributions from supplemental fossil fuels or raw materials in industrial kilns. This is done to avoid identifying MACT floor levels based on

feedrate control of raw materials or conventional fossil fuels.

In cases where only feedrate control is used for control of the particular HAP, then the MACT floor is defined by the highest MTEC used by the MACT pool sources. In cases where some sources in the MACT pool use feedrate control only and others use feedrate control in combination with emission control technologies, MACT is defined as either feedrate control only or combined feedrate with emissions control technologies. In certain situations, the definition of MACT may be complicated by different MACT pool source conditions that have conflicting APCD design features and MTEC feedrate controls. For example, one condition in the MACT pool may have a high MTEC and standard design features. Another condition may have a lower MTEC and substandard design features for the same APCD type. In this case, MACT for a particular APCD type is defined by a combination of most lenient features of both MACT pool sources (i.e., highest MTEC and “worst” design feature).

“Equivalent (or improved) technology” may also be used to expand the definition of MACT air pollution control technology beyond that determined by the best-performing MACT pool facilities. Additional technologies that are not used by the MACT pool are considered as MACT if, based on engineering judgement, they have equivalent (or better) performance to that used by the MACT pool. Consider, for example, MACT for SVM for incinerators is determined to be a venturi scrubber with a corresponding feedrate MTEC, and that no facilities with fabric filters, ESPs, or ionizing wet scrubbers happen to make it into the MACT pool. In this case, fabric filters, ESPs, and ionizing wet scrubbers (which are believed to have similar or improved SVM control performance compared with the MACT venturi scrubbers) would be added to the definition of MACT (with the corresponding venturi scrubber limiting MTEC).

2.1.2.5 Identify MACT Expanded Universe

The MACT definition is used to identify all conditions in the entire source category which are also believed to use MACT or equivalent control schemes. This new expanded set, containing the MACT best performing facilities as well as potentially other higher emitting facilities that use MACT, is referred to as the “MACT Expanded Universe” (MACT EU) or “Expanded MACT

Pool”.

If MACT is defined by feedrate MTEC only, the facilities in the MACT EU must simply

# 2-8 have an MTEC at or below the MACT defining level. If MACT is defined by APCD only, then the facilities in the MACT EU must have the same or equivalent technology (with appropriate design characteristics if known). If MACT is defined by both feedrate MTEC and APCD, then facilities in the EU must have a combination of both lower MTEC feedrate compared with the MACT level and equal or better APCD. Facility conditions not using MACT (using either non-MACT control technology or higher MTEC feedrates) are not considered part of the EU.

2.1.2.6 Statistically Evaluate the MACT Expanded Universe to Determine Floor

The MACT EU that has been identified above is used to determine the MACT floor level for each HAP and source category combination. The MACT floor level is the emissions level that all existing sources in the MACT EU are able to achieve routinely on a day-to-day basis. The MACT floor level is calculated using a statistical procedure that is described in detail in Appendix C (“Statistical Analysis of Hazardous Air Pollutant Concentrations From Hazardous Waste Combustors”). Only the results from the statistical analysis are discussed in this document. The procedure is described briefly below.

The first step of the statistical procedure is to determine the distribution of the data in the MACT EU for each source category and HAP combination. Note that in general the HAP data fit a log-normal distribution better than a normal distribution; therefore all HAP distributions are assumed to be log-normally distributed.

Next, a MACT floor “design” level is determined as the log-mean of the source condition in the MACT EU with the highest arithmetic mean. The MACT “standard” level is determined as the design level with the additional consideration of typical emissions variability. Emissions variability is statistically estimated, given that the database consists of short term “snap-shots” of emissions levels. The statistical approach identifies the MACT floor standard that a source emitting at the “design” level and having average with-in test condition variability (determined by sources in the MACT EU) could be expected to meet 99% of the time (standards based on the 90 and 95 th 

# percentile limits were also calculated). The delta-lognormal methodology is used for analysis. This methodology is advantageous since it allows for the consideration of detected versus non-detected samples (i.e., less weight given to non-detect sample measurements), and the variability factor considers the average variability among runs with-in test conditions in the MACT EU (i.e., it does not consider variability between different sources test conditions).

In a few situations, results of the statistical analysis are not used; instead, floor levels are proposed at the level of the current federally enforced EPA RCRA standard (e.g., HC for cement kilns at the main stack at 20 ppmv).

2.2 NEW SOURCE PROCEDURE

For new sources, the standards for a source category cannot be less stringent than the emission control that is achieved in practice by the best-controlled similar source. The approach to determine the MACT floor for new sources parallels in almost all ways to that described above for existing sources (the Combined Technology and Statistical Approach), except for one difference. The determination of the MACT is defined by the best performing source, not the top 6% (the median

# 2-9 and better of the best performing 12%). All other procedures are similar for the new floor determination compared with the existing floor evaluation methodology.

# 3-1 SECTION 3

EXISTING SOURCES FLOOR DETERMINATIONS

MACT floor levels for existing sources using the proposed “6% Floor” approach described in Section 2 are discussed for each of the HAP (or HAP surrogate) and source category combinations. The discussions include, for each combination:

• Summary tables of all test condition stack gas emissions data from the HWC database presented in the accompanying Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards,

Volume II: HWC Emissions Data Base

.

• HAP control techniques used by the existing sources.

• The range of emission levels for the entire source category.

• Identification of the best-performing MACT pool sources, the range of emissions levels of the best performing sources, MACT technologies used by the best performing technologies (used to define MACT), and discussion of “equivalent technologies” used to expand the definition of MACT if appropriate.

• Identification of the MACT expanded universe (EU) facilities based on the definition of MACT. The range of emissions levels in the EU. A discussion of the reasons that conditions

were not included in the EU.

• The existing source MACT design and standard level based on the statistical analysis of the MACT EU population of source test conditions.

The summary ranking tables for each of the HAP and source category combinations are used to define the MACT pool, determine the expanded universe, and screen out conditions. The tables contain the following columns of information for each test condition (row entry) from left to right

across the table:

• “Subst” — Defines the HAP of interest (“PM” stands for particulate matter, “TEQ” stands for PCDD/PCDF TEQ, “SVM” for semi-volatile metals, “LVM” for low volatility metals, “TOT CL” for total chlorine, “CO” for carbon monoxide, and “HC” for hydrocarbons).

• “Syst Type” — Defines the source category type (“INC” for incinerators, “CK” for cement kilns, and “LWAK” for light weight aggregate kilns).

# 3-2 • “EPA Cond ID” — Defines the test condition identification number corresponding to the ID number used in the EPA HWC database. The first three digits identify the combustion source emitting point (each emitting source must have its own stack), followed by the test condition ID number (e.g., “C2” stands for test condition number 2). The test condition ID is required since some facility emitting points have a number of different test conditions for the same HAP. Facility name and locations corresponding to the three digit ID codes are given in Appendix E.

• “APCS” — Identifies the devices used in the air pollution control system. An acronyms list for the various devices is provided in Appendix D and in accompanying Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume II: HWC Emissions Data Base

.

• For PCDD/PCDF only, “APCS Class” — Identifies the type of air pollution control system used, depending on whether the flue gas is saturated prior to the primary PM control device. A “w” stands for a wet type (flue gas is saturated at the primary PM control device), “d” for dry (the flue gas temperature is maintained above the saturation point in the primary PM control device), or w/d” for wet/dry (the air pollution control system utilizes both wet and dry PM control devices).

• For PCDD/PCDF only, “PM APCD Temp” — This identifies the flue gas temperature at the primary PM APCD. It is used for PCDD/PCDF to define MACT.

• For total chlorine, and metals groupings (SVM, LVM, and mercury), “MTEC” — MTEC is

used to define MACT and determine the MACT EU. The MTECs shown consider that contributed by hazardous waste only, and do not include that from the raw materials or supplemental fuels. MTECs are used in the MACT process; the procedure for determining

MTECs is described in detail in Section 2 of this volume.

• “Stack Gas Conc” — Stack gas emissions concentrations of the HAP of interest for the test condition. Average (“Avg”) of all the individual runs (usually three) in test condition, as well as the maximum (“Max”) and minimum (“Min”) of the individual run levels are provided. Note that the test conditions are ranked, lowest to highest, by condition average.

• “Comments” — Identifies for each test condition the following:

— “MACT source” — Used if the condition is one of the best-performing MACT sources (in MACT pool), and is used to define MACT. The HAP control method used by the condition follows in the parenthesis.

— “Already MACT source” — Used if a condition from the same facility has already been included in the MACT pool.

— “In” — Used if the condition is considered as part of MACT expanded universe. The reason is included in the parenthesis.

# 3-3 — “Out” — Used if the condition is not considered as part of the MACT EU. Reasons are given following. For example, “Not MACT” signifies that the condition does not use MACT technology; “Poor MB” signifies that the condition has a poor mass balance; “HW not burned” signifies that this is a baseline condition where hazardous wastes are not burned; “DL measurement” is used when the measurement level of the stack gas is at the analytical detection limit.

3.1 PCDD/PCDF TEQ

3.1.1 Incinerators

Table 3-1 summarizes all PCDD/PCDF TEQ condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. Condition data are from 24 different HWIs. Condition averages range widely from 0.005 to 38.5 TEQ ng/dscm. PCDD/PCDF is controlled from incinerators by a variety of techniques including:

• Maintaining good combustion conditions (limiting generation of PCDD/PCDF precursors, which may be indicated by flue gas CO and HC levels).

• Rapid flue gas quenching and limiting PM air pollution control device temperature (to prevent the low-temperature catalytic formation process).

• Use of PM air pollution control devices to capture condensed and adsorbed particulate PCDD/PCDF, and use of activated carbon to collect (adsorb) PCDD/PCDF from flue gas (only one facility, source 222, currently uses carbon injection).

The MACT pool contains 3 facilities. The MACT pool sources have average condition emissions levels of less than 0.01 TEQ ng/dscm. All of the best-performing MACT pool facilities use quenching of the hot gases from the combustion chamber to saturation conditions, followed by wet scrubbing air pollution control systems for primary PM control and acid gas control (at which flue gas temperatures are typically below 200 ° F). The control of flue gas temperature may inhibit the formation of PCDD/PCDF downstream of the combustion system; PCDD/PCDF has been shown to form in PM control devices operating at temperatures of from 400 to 700 ° F. MACT is defined as the control of the primary PM air pollution control device temperature below 400 ° F.

Based on the above definition of MACT for PCDD/PCDF control, the MACT expanded universe contains all HWIs using primary PM control device temperature below 400 ° F. The MACT EU contains conditions with a large range of PCDD/PCDF levels, from 0.005 to 38.5 TEQ ng/ dscm. This indicates that the air pollution control device system type (and flue gas temperature profile and quenching rate) may not be the only important considerations affecting PCDD/PCDF control; other factors such as combustion quality and waste composition (such as the level of PCDD/ PCDF precursors and formation/destruction catalysts) may also be of importance. However, these parameters are difficult to quantify for the definition of MACT.

# 3-4 The majority of conditions in the EU have levels less than 0.7 ng/dscm; while greater than 50% have levels less than 0.2 ng/dscm. However, there are a couple of relatively high emitters. Additionally, only two types of facilities in the MACT EU have emissions levels above 3.5 TEQ ng/dscm: those burning substantial levels of known PCDD/PCDF precursors, or those equipped

with waste heat boilers.

Source 330, with two test conditions that have an average greater than 34 TEQ ng/dscm, uses the MACT rapid wet quench and wet scrubbing APCS. It burns waste oils with high extremely high levels of PCBs (30% by weight). The combustor was operating at good combustion conditions (greater than 2000 ° F, greater than 2 seconds combustion gas residence time, greater than 99.9999% PCB destruction efficiency). However, the PCBs may lead to the formation of PCDD/PCDF either by themselves or by PICs generated during their combustion acting as formation precursors.

Source 229 uses a waste heat boiler followed by a wet quench and wet scrubbing system. Facilities using waste heat boilers or other types of heat exchangers (for flue gas cooling and/or energy recovery purposes) followed by wet scrubbing systems have been included in the MACT EU. However, it has been hypothesized that boilers and other types of heat exchangers may provide conditions leading to low-temperature catalytic formation (due to particulate hold-up on heat exchanger tubes and slow gas cooling through the catalytic PCDD/PCDF formation temperature region). Waste heat boiler equipped incinerators using wet PM control systems have emissions ranging from 0.4 to 8 TEQ ng/dscm. Additionally, it is noted that wastes spiked with high levels of carbon tetrachloride and hexachlorobenzene were used during the trial burn for source 229; once again, these suspected PCDD/PCDF precursors may also be responsible for the high PCDD/PCDF

levels.

Statistical analysis of the MACT EU provides a design level of 20 TEQ ng/dscm with a corresponding standard of 40 TEQ ng/dscm. Note that the floor may also be expressed as primary PM control device temperature control to below 400 ° F. Additionally, note that over 50% of the conditions in the entire database currently meet a level of 0.2 TEQ ng/dscm.

3.1.2 Cement Kilns

Table 3-2 summarizes all PCDD/PCDF TEQ test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 27 different CKs. Condition averages range widely from 0.004 to nearly 50 TEQ ng/dscm. All of the control techniques discussed above for incinerators may also be applicable for the control of PCDD/PCDF in CKs. Presently, PCDD/PCDF in CKs is controlled (inadvertently, generally) primarily by limiting PM air pollution control device temperature (to prevent the low-temperature catalytic formation process) and use of particulate matter air pollution control devices (to capture condensed and adsorbed particulate PCDD/PCDF). Carbon injection and flue gas quenching are not used, although some kilns are evaluating the use of flue gas quenching (and reduced PM control device temperature) for controlling PCDD/PCDF. Many factors potentially affect PCDD/PCDF formation in a cement kiln (e.g., formation may occur in the kiln or preheater unit). However, reducing flue gas temperature in the PM control device is one factor shown to have a significant impact on PCDD/PCDF formation (e.g., EPA, 1994; EER, 1995). Additionally, recently

# 3-5 testing on a hazardous waste burning cement kiln has shown that PCDD/PCDF is not present at significant levels prior to the APCD (EER, 1995).

The MACT pool contains 3 facilities. The facilities have condition averages less than 0.02 TEQ ng/dscm. MACT for CKs is defined by limiting the primary PM control device (ESP or FF) temperature. Also, although PM control device type and efficiency may be related to PCDD/PCDF control as mentioned above, it is not believed to be of importance compared with APCD temperature. Thus, MACT for CKs is determined by the maximum PM air pollution control device temperature used by sources in the MACT pool. The MACT limit temperature, based on source 207C1, is

418 ° F.

The MACT expanded universe contains all conditions with PM air pollution control device temperatures below the MACT limit of 418 ° F. The majority of kilns in the MACT EU are low emitters; all except 1 facility has a condition average below 0.8 TEQ ng/dscm; 75% of the facilities in the MACT EU are below 0.2 ng/dscm. However, one facility with low APCD temperature (source 203C1) is emitting at a much higher level (5 TEQ ng/dscm). Therefore although temperature in general seems to be a good indicator of PCDD/PCDF levels, in some cases the general trend of low PCDD/PCDF with low temperature does not hold.

The statistically derived MACT floor analysis of the MACT EU provides a design level of 4 TEQ ng/dscm, and a standard of 8 TEQ ng/dscm. Additionally, the floor may be expressed as controlling PM APCD flue gas temperature to below 418 ° F. Note that 75% of the existing sources with PM APCD temperature below 418 ° F currently achieve emission levels of below 0.2 TEQ ng/

dscm.

3.1.3 Light W eight Aggregate Kilns

PCDD/PCDF stack gas emissions measurements were obtained for only one facility (conditions 336C1 and 336C2). The data indicated an average test condition emission level of 0.04 TEQ ng/dscm. Due to the lack of PCDD/PCDF data for LWAKs, and because of certain design and process similarities between LWAKs and cement kilns that may affect PCDD/PCDF emissions, such as high inlet PM grain loading, similar APCDs, and concurrent kiln operation (raw materials fed at the cold end of the kiln) leading to similar kiln temperature profiles (and possibly organics gas content), the PCDD/PCDF data from the LWAKs and cement kilns were pooled to determine floor levels. Therefore, identical PCDD/PCDF MACT floor levels for both LWAKs and cement kilns. The determination of this floor level is discussed above for existing cement kilns in greater

detail.

3.2 PARTICULATE MATTER

3.2.1 Incinerators

Table 3-3 summarizes all particulate matter (PM) test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 73 different incinerators. Condition averages range widely from 0.00002 to 1.9 gr/dscf. PM is controlled from HWIs with a wide range of techniques; some

# 3-6 with a combination of multiple state-of-the-art device such as FF, ESPs, and novel wet scrubbers (e.g., IWS, hydrosonic, etc.). Many of the liquid injection types use only conventional venturi scrubbers. A couple sources use no active add-on APCD, relying instead on waste ash feedrate

control.

The MACT pool is comprised of 5 sources (6% of all sources in the database). All MACT pool sources control PM to less than 0.001 gr/dscf on average. MACT is defined by the use of the following PM APCDs:

• FF with air-to-cloth ratio less than 10 acfm/ft 2 

# (based on source 350C3).

• IWS and VS (based on source 354C1). ESP is considered as equivalent technology.

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 0.03 gr/dscf. Conditions not making it into the EU do not have the appropriate MACT PM control technology. Statistical analysis of the MACT EU provided a floor design level of 0.038 gr/dscf, with a corresponding standard level of 0.107 gr/dscf. Almost all facilities would meet this standard. Note that currently, HWIs are subject to a RCRA standard of 0.08 gr/dscf.

3.2.2 Cement Kilns

Table 3-4 summarizes all PM test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 34 different CKs. Condition averages range widely from 0.001 to 0.21 gr/dscf. Cement kilns typically have a high uncontrolled grain loading (greater than 30 gr/dscf); finely pulverized raw material fed to the kiln is entrained in the flue gas entering the control device. FFs and ESPs are used for PM control. Wet process kilns have traditionally used ESPs; all but one of the wet kilns uses currently uses an ESP. However, there is no technical reason as to why wet kilns can not use fabric filters, as discussed further in Section 5. Dry kilns use both FFs and ESPs.

The MACT pool consists of 3 sources. These sources have emissions levels below 0.003 gr/dscf on average. They all use FFs for PM control with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than 2.3 acfm/

ft 2 

# , defining MACT. The MACT EU contains all FF conditions with an air-to-cloth ratio less than

2.3 acfm/ft 2 

# . ESPs are not identified by MACT; however, well designed and operated devices can easily achieve these levels. The MACT EU contains conditions with average levels up to 0.05. Statistical analysis of the EU provides a MACT design level of 0.032 and a MACT standard of

0.065.

New Source Performance Standards for cement manufacturing plants (non-hazardous waste burning kilns) establish a PM standard for new CK sources of 0.3 lbs PM per ton of raw material feed (on a dry basis) to the kiln (40 CFR Part 60.62). This equates approximately to a stack gas concentration level of 0.03 gr/dscf. Because this performance standard is a federally enforceable limit that many CKs are currently subject to (the standards were promulgated in 1971), this 0.03 gr/ dscf level standard, not the statistically-derived limit discussed above, is chosen to represent the MACT floor level. This level is achievable by about 60% of the existing hazardous waste burning

CKs.

# 3-7 3.2.3 Light W eight Aggregate Kilns

Table 3-5 summarizes all PM test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 12 different LWAKs. Condition averages range from 0.0005 to 0.02 gr/dscf. Like CKs, LWAKs have high grain loading in flue gas. All use FFs for PM control; one uses a FF

with a VS.

The MACT pool consists of 3 sources. These sources have emissions levels below 0.006 gr/dscf on average. They all use FFs for PM control with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than 2.8 acfm/

ft 2 

# , which defines MACT. The MACT EU contains all FF conditions with an air-to-cloth ratio of

less than 2.8 acfm/ft 2 

# . The MACT EU contains conditions with average levels up to 0.02 gr/dscf. Statistical analysis of the EU provides a MACT design level of 0.024 gr/dscf and a corresponding MACT standard of 0.05 gr/dscf.

3.3 MERCURY

3.3.1 Incinerators

Table 3-6 summarizes all mercury test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The data are from about 29 different HWIs. Condition averages range widely from 0.1 to
1,400 μ g/dscm flue gas measurements. Mercury emissions from HWIs are controlled through feedrate control and/or use of air pollution control devices. Carbon injection is used on one facility as discussed above for PCDD/PCDF; however, no performance data for mercury control is available. Wet scrubbers, which have limited capture ability for certain soluble forms of mercury species (primarily mercury salts), are used by almost all HWIs.

The MACT pool is comprised of the top 3 sources. These sources have condition average

emissions levels of less than 0.9 μ g/dscm. One source uses feedrate control; the others use feedrate control with wet scrubbing. MACT is defined as either feedrate control with an MTEC less than 19

μ g/dscm (based on source 341C2), or a wet scrubber with a feedrate control MTEC less than 51 (based on source 221C5).

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 48 μ g/dscm (source 902C1). This source uses a wet scrubber, but unlike that in the MACT pool, the wet scrubber did not demonstrate mercury control. All but 2 of the conditions in the EU have emissions levels less

than 20 μ g/dscm. Conditions not making it into the EU had either MTECs higher than the MACT limit (the limit depends on the use of wet scrubbing), or mass balance problems (stack emissions significantly higher than the feedrate MTEC measurements, such as 327C2, indicating that the reported MTEC is in question).

The floor design level is determined to be 57 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level

of 130 μ g/dscm. About 70% of conditions in the entire HWI universe currently meet this design level using feedrate with or without mercury emissions control devices (wet scrubbers).

# 3-8 3.3.2 Cement Kilns

Table 3-7 summarizes all mercury test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 25 different CKs. Condition averages range widely from 3 to 600 μ g/dscm. Note that source 301C1 is shown in the ranking tables having an average emissions level of 3,000

μ g/dscm; this was the level that was measured during the trial where a significant amount of mercury was spiked into the waste. Further assessment of this facility has determined that in normal operations, much lower mercury feedrates are used; it is assumed that the facility has a waste feed

MTEC of 200 μ g/dscm which is typical of the other hazardous waste burning cement kilns, and a

total emissions level of 600 μ g/dscm when considering mercury from the raw materials and supplemental fossil fuels.

Mercury system removal efficiencies (SREs) (determined as one minus the measured stack gas mass emissions rate of mercury divided by the input system mass emissions rate (MTEC)) in CKs range from 0 to more than 90%. Because mercury is a volatile compound at the typical operating temperature of PM control devices (ESPs and FFs), collection of mercury in these control devices is highly variable. Typically, most of the mercury exists in the kiln system as volatile stack emissions; and only a small fraction partitions to the clinker product or the captured APCD dust (cement kiln dust). Therefore, it is assumed that mercury is not currently being actively controlled in hazardous waste burning CKs by any other means than control of the mercury content in the

hazardous waste feed.

As discussed above, due to the variability of system removal performance and expected volatility of mercury, MACT for mercury control in CKs is defined as hazardous waste feedrate control only. The MACT pool is comprised of the top 3 sources. These sources have average

emissions levels of less than 8 μ g/dscm. MACT is defined as feedrate control with a hazardous

waste MTEC less than 108 μ g/dscm (based on source 406C1).

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 92 μ g/dscm (source 208C2). Conditions not making it into the EU have hazardous waste MTECs that are higher than the MACT limit, have mass balance problems (stack emissions significantly higher than the feedrate MTEC measurements, such as 305C3, indicating that the reported MTEC is in question), or were not operating with hazardous waste during the testing period.

The floor design level is determined to be 81 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level

of 130 μ g/dscm. Over 75% of conditions in the entire CK universe currently meet this design level.

3.3.3 Light W eight Aggregate Kilns

Table 3-8 summarizes all mercury test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 10 different LWAKs. Condition averages range widely from 0.4 to 560

μ g/dscm. All except one LWAK uses hazardous waste feedrate control; source 307 uses a VS that achieves about 75% mercury control.

# 3-9 Similar to CKs discussed above, the top 3 MACT pool sources utilize hazardous waste feedrate control. These MACT pool sources have condition average emissions levels below 9 μ g/ dscm. MACT is defined based on feedrate control used by the highest MACT pool source. The

MACT feedrate control MTEC level is 17 μ g/dscm (based on source 313C1).

The MACT EU contains all conditions with feedrate MTECs less than the MACT defining

level of 17 μ g/dscm. The highest condition average in the EU is 32 μ g/dscm (source 223C1). The MACT floor design is determined to be 36 μ g/dscm, while the associated MACT standard is 72 μ g/ dscm. All facilities except source 307 currently meet this design level.

3.4 SEMI VOLATILE METALS

3.4.1 Incinerators

Table 3-9 summarizes all SVM test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 42 different HWIs. Condition averages range widely from 1.5 to almost 30,000

μ g/dscm. SVMs (cadmium and lead) are volatile at the typical temperatures within the incinerator chamber, but usually condense onto the fine particulate at the PM APCD temperatures where they are collected. Thus, the control of SVM emissions is related to PM control. Additionally, because of the potential for adsorption for these metals onto the fine PM that is less effectively collected than large particulate, the control efficiency for SVM is lower than that for total PM. SVM in HWIs is controlled with a combination of both feedrate control and PM air pollution control device.

The MACT pool is comprised of the top 3 sources. These sources have average emissions

levels less than 6 μ g/dscm. These sources, defining MACT, use:

• VS with an MTEC of 1.7x10 2 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 500C1). Any PM control device is considered as equivalent technology.

• ESP and WS combination with an MTEC of 5.8x10 3 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 340C1).

• VS and IWS with an MTEC of 4.9x10 4 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 354C1). FFs are considered as equivalent technology.

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 100 μ g/dscm. The floor design level is determined to be 120 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 270 μ g/dscm. About 65% of conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level, even though many of these facilities do not use MACT.

3.4.2 Cement Kilns

Table 3-10 summarizes all SVM test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 34 different CKs. Condition averages range widely from 4 to 6,000 μ g/dscm.

# 3-10 SVM behavior and control is in some respects similar to that discussed for incinerators; SVM in CKs is controlled with a combination of both feedrate control and PM air pollution control devices (either FF or ESPs). Additionally, constituents of the cement making process may act to bind up the SVMs in the cement clinker product, providing additional control. Note that SVM system removal efficiencies (SRE) in cement kilns typically range from 99 to 99.9%, with some greater than 99.99%, depending on factors such as feedrate MTEC level, APCD type, and other system operating characteristics such as the use of kiln dust recycling.

The MACT pool is comprised of the top 3 sources. These sources have average emissions

levels less than 9 μ g/dscm. All 3 sources use FFs. MACT is defined as a FF with an air-to-cloth

ratio of less than 2.1 acfm/ft 2 

# and MTEC of less than 8.4x10 4 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 316C1).

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 33 μ g/dscm (source 303C3). Conditions not making it into the EU either do not use FFs, or use FFs with hazardous waste MTECs that are higher than the MACT limit or air-to-cloth ratios higher than 2.1. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 34 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of

57 μ g/dscm. About 35% of conditions in the entire universe currently meet this design level.

3.4.3 Light W eight Aggregate Kilns

Table 3-11 summarizes all SVM test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 10 different LWAKs. Condition averages range widely from 1 to over
1,600 μ g/dscm. SVM behavior and control is similar to that discussed above for HWI and CKs. SVM in LWAKs are controlled with a combination of both feedrate control and PM air pollution control device. SVM SREs in LWAKs, as in CKs, range typically from 99 to 99.9%, with some as high as 99.99%.

The MACT pool is comprised of the top 3 sources. These sources have average emissions

levels less than 4 μ g/dscm. All three sources use FFs. MACT is defined as the use of an FF with

air-to-cloth ratio less than 1.5 acfm/ft 2 

# and an MTEC of less than 2.7x10 5 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 225C1) or a combination of FF and VS with the FF at an air-to-cloth ratio less than 4.2 and

an MTEC less than 5.4x10 4 

# (based on source 307C4).

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 4 μ g/dscm. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 7.4 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 12 μ g/ dscm. About 50% of conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design

level.

3.5 LOW VOLATILE METALS

3.5.1 Incinerators

Table 3-12 summarizes all LVM test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 41 different HWIs. Condition averages range widely from 4 to over 130,000 μ g/ dscm. LVM are relatively non-volatile at the typical temperatures within the incinerator chamber,

# 3-11 thus, the control of LVM emissions is related primarily to PM control; although feedrate is also important. LVM in HWIs are controlled with a combination of both feedrate control and PM air pollution control devices.

The MACT pool is comprised of the top 3 sources. These sources have average emissions

levels less than 8 μ g/dscm. These sources, defining MACT, use:

• VS with an MTEC of 1x10 3 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 500C1). Any PM control device is considered as equivalent technology.

• IWS with an MTEC of 6.2x10 3 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 348C1). FF and ESPs are considered as equivalent technology.

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 145 μ g/dscm (source 221C4). The floor design level is determined to be 110 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard

level of 210 μ g/dscm. About 80% of conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level, even though many of these facilities do not use the MACT floor defining

control schemes.

3.5.2 Cement Kilns

Table 3-13 summarizes all LVM test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 34 different CKs. Condition averages range widely from 4 to 520 μ g/dscm. As discussed for HWIs, LVMs are relatively non-volatile at the typical temperature of the kiln. LVM in CKs is controlled with a combination of both feedrate control and PM air pollution control device. Note that LVM SREs in CKs typically are greater 99.95%, with some above 99.99%.

The MACT pool is comprised of the top 3 sources. These sources have average emissions

levels less than 6 μ g/dscm. Two of the sources use FFs, and one uses an ESP. MACT is defined as

either a FF with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than 2.3 acfm/ft 2 

# and a MTEC of less than 1.4x10 5 

# μ g/ dscm (based on sources 320C1 and 316C2, which have a maximum MTEC of 4.4x10 4 

# ) or an ESP with a specific collection area (SCA) greater than 350 ft 2 

# /kacfm with an MTEC less than 1.4x10 5



# μ g/dscm (based on source 204C1). Note that the FF with an air-to-cloth ratio of 2.3 is beleived to have equivalent (or better) performance compared with the ESP with an SCA of 350; therefore the higher MTEC associated with the ESP source 204C1 is applied as well to the FF MACT definition.

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 60 μ g/dscm (319C1). The floor design level is determined to be 67 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 130

μ g/dscm. Over 80% of conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design

level.

3.5.3 Light W eight Aggregate Kilns

Table 3-14 summarizes all LVM test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 10 different LWAKs. Condition averages range from 10 to 289 μ g/

# 3-12 dscm. LVM behavior and control is similar to that discussed above for HWI and CKs. LVM in LWAKs is controlled with a combination of both feedrate control and PM air pollution control device. SREs for LVM in LWAKs are also, like cement kilns, typically greater than 99.9%, with

some above 99.99%.

The MACT pool is comprised of the top 3 sources. These sources have average emissions

levels less than 37 μ g/dscm. All three sources use FFs. MACT is defined as a FF with air-tocloth

ratio less than 1.8 acfm/ft 2 

# and a MTEC of less than 4.6x10 4 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 312C1).

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 289 μ g/dscm. The floor design level is determined to be 230 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 340 μ g/dscm. All of the conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level.

3.6 TOTAL CHLORINE (HCl + Cl 2 

# )

3.6.1 Incinerators

Table 3-15 summarizes all total chlorine test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 59 different sources. Condition averages range widely from 0.1 to 1,000 ppmv. Almost all HWIs use some type of wet scrubbing for the control of chlorine. Wet scrubbing devices include venturi-types, packed towers, spray towers, ionizing wet scrubbers, and free-jet and hydro-sonic scrubbers. A couple use dry or semi-dry scrubbing either by themselves or in combination with wet scrubbing. A couple do not use any add-on chlorine gas control systems, instead relying on chlorine feedrate control.

The top 4 MACT pool sources (6% of the data sources) use wet scrubbers for chlorine control. This includes combinations of venturi and packed bed scrubbing, and hydrosonic scrubbing by itself. These MACT pool sources have condition average emissions levels below 0.3 ppmv. MACT is defined based on feedrate control used by the highest MACT pool source in combination with wet scrubbing. The MACT feedrate control MTEC level is 2.1x10 7 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 808C2).

The MACT EU contains all conditions with feedrate MTEC less than the MACT defining

level of 2.1x10 7 

# μ g/dscm in conjunction with wet scrubbing. The highest condition average in the expanded universe is at 70 ppmv. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 96 ppmv, while the associated MACT standard is 280 ppmv. About 90% of all test conditions in the entire source category universe meet this design level. Facilities not included in the EU include those not using wet scrubbing, as well as those using wet scrubbing with MTECs above the MACT defining level.

3.6.2 Cement Kilns

Table 3-16 summarizes all total chlorine test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 33 different CKs. Condition averages range widely from 0.1 to 220

# 3-13 ppmv. No hazardous waste burning CKs currently use a dedicated control device designed specifically to remove chlorine from the flue gas (e.g., wet or dry scrubbers). Most of the chlorine generated during combustion of chlorine-containing hazardous wastes is neutralized by the highly alkaline particulate resulting from the use of limestone in the cement making process. In effect, the kiln itself is a dry scrubbing process. As shown in Table 3-16, chlorine system removal efficiencies in hazardous waste burning CKs ranges from 60 to 99+%, with most greater than 95%.

MACT for chlorine control in CKs is defined by chlorine feedrate control (although in general FF-equipped kilns tend to have increased levels of chlorine control, possibly due to the filter cake build-up of acid gas absorbing entrained cement kiln dust). The top 3 MACT pool sources have condition average emissions levels below 0.7 ppmv. MACT is defined based on the highest feedrate MTEC used by a MACT pool source (source 204C2, with a chlorine MTEC of

1.6x10 6 

# μ g/dscm).

The MACT EU contains all conditions with feedrate MTEC less than the MACT defining

level of 1.6x10 6 

# μ g/dscm. The highest condition average in the EU is at 220 ppmv, which is also the highest emitting source in the entire source category. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 270 ppmv, while the associated MACT standard is 630 ppmv. All test conditions meet this design level. Facilities not included in the EU include those with MTECs above the MACT defining

level.

3.6.3 Light W eight Aggregate Kilns

Table 3-17 summarizes all total chlorine test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The data are from 10 different LWAKs. Condition averages range widely from 13 to 2,000 ppmv. One source (307) uses a wet scrubbing VS for the control of chlorine. Dry scrubbing for chlorine control is believed to be used on the Solite Carolina and Florida facilities; however, control efficiency is unclear due to conflicting trial burn results. For all other LWAKs, which use FF alone, feedrate control is the chlorine control method.

The best performing top 3 MACT pool sources use a combination of feedrate control and wet venturi scrubber as well as feedrate control alone for chlorine control. These MACT pool sources have condition average emissions levels below 853 ppmv. MACT is defined as either the use of wet scrubbing with a feedrate control MTEC of 1.4x10 7 

# (based on source 307C2) or feedrate

control alone with an MTEC level of 1.5x10 6 

# μ g/dscm (source 314C1).

The MACT EU contains all conditions with feedrate MTEC less than the MACT defining

level of 1.5x10 6 

# μ g/dscm; there are no other facilities in the universe that use wet scrubbing beyond that in the MACT pool. The highest condition average in the expanded universe is 1,347 ppmv. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 1,400 ppmv, while the associated MACT standard is 2,100 ppmv. About 90% of all test conditions meet this design level.

# 3-14 3.7 TRACE ORGANICS SURROGATES

3.7.1 Incinerators

3.7.1.1 Hydrocarbons

Tables 3-18 and 3-19 summarize all HC run average (RA) and HC maximum hourly rolling average (MHRA) test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average (also shown in Figures 3-3 and 3-4). The HC (RA) data are from 31 different sources and ranges widely from 0.2 to 36 ppmv. The HC (MHRA) data are from only 3 sources and ranges from 2 to 43 ppmv. HC is controlled from HWIs by maintaining “good combustion design, operating, and maintenance practices” (GCP-D/O/M) which may include providing adequate excess oxygen and fuel and air mixing, blending of wastes and fuels to avoid combustion “spikes”, maintenance of high temperature and adequate flue gas residence time at temperature, operation of the facility by qualified operators, periodic maintenance of burners and fuel and supply lines and injection nozzles to the recommended standards, and/or use of combustion gas afterburning.

The best performing sources have HC levels of less than 1 ppmv. MACT for HC is defined as GCP-D/O/M described above. It has not been attempted to quantify the GCP-D/O/M used by these best-performing facilities; even if it was, it may be of limited use in determining the MACT EU without a detailed evaluation of each test condition. Therefore, a quantitative evaluation of the entire universe, combined with engineering judgement on what HC level is reasonably achievable by well operated and designed facilities, is used to determine the floor level.

All source category test conditions are shown in Figures 3-3 and 3-4. A sharp break in the run average plot occurs at source 706C1, having a test condition average level of 6 ppmv. Other conditions to the right of this source on the plot (having higher test condition averages) are considered as not having been operated with GCP-D/O/M. Thus the MACT EU is determined as all test conditions with test averages below that of source 706C1 (all conditions to the left of source 706C1 on the plot). Statistical evaluation of this EU provides a design level of 6.1 ppmv, and a standard of 12 ppmv. Over 95% of HC (RA) existing source conditions in the entire universe meet this level.

Note that the data discussed above may have certain limitations. Unlike CKs and LWAKs, HWIs are not currently required to monitor HC under EPAs regulations. Emissions data were obtained mostly for their own information. It is not clear in many cases if the data were obtained using heated or unheated HC flame ionization detectors (FID). In unheated FIDs, soluble volatiles and semi-volatiles in the stack gas are condensed out before entering the detector; therefore unheated FID HC measurements may be biased low compared with heated FID detectors. Additionally, much of the data is reported as averages over the entire test period, as opposed to the maximum hourly rolling average period that is proposed for the MACT standards. However, the MACT analysis has been conducted noting, but neglecting at this time, these limitations.

3.7.1.2 Carbon Monoxide

# 3-15 Tables 3-20 and 3-21 summarizes CO (RA) and CO (MHRA) test condition data from HWIs. CO (RA) are available from 59 facilities. CO (RA) ranges widely from 0.3 to 10,000 ppmv. CO (MHRA) are available from 17 facilities, and range from 10 to 1,600 ppmv. As discussed above for HC, CO is controlled from incinerators by maintaining good combustion practices including providing adequate excess oxygen and fuel/air mixing, blending of wastes and fuels to avoid combustion “spikes”, maintenance of high temperature and adequate flue gas residence time, operation of the facility by qualified operators, periodic maintenance of burners, fuel and supply lines, and injection nozzles to the recommended standards, and/or use of combustion gas afterburning.

The best performing sources have levels below 10 ppmv. As discussed above for HCs, quantifying GCP-D/O/M used by the MACT facilities, and determining if other facilities use this control, is difficult without a detailed evaluation of each test condition. Thus, the MACT floor, again like HC, is based on engineering judgement and levels being achieved by the entire existing source category universe. All CO data, by source test condition and ranked by condition average, is shown in Figure 3-5. A discontinuity occurs at source 351C1, with a condition average of about 50 ppmv; higher emitting conditions to the right of this breakpoint source are not considered to not be using GCP-D/O/M. All conditions to the left of the breakpoint source are considered as part of the expanded universe (those with condition average levels below about 50 ppmv). Based on this EU, a MACT floor design level of 52 ppmv, and a MACT standard of 120 ppmv is determined. About 80% of existing facilities meet this standard.

3.7.2 Cement Kilns

Cement kilns that do not have bypass stack (almost exclusively long kilns) are currently required under the EPA RCRA BIF regulations to:

• Control CO in the main stack to less than 100 ppmv (no limit on HC); or

• Control HC in the main stack to less than 20 ppmv (no limit on CO).

Cement kilns with bypasses (typically preheater and preheater/precalciner arrangements) can monitor the bypass stack to comply with:

• Control of CO in the bypass to less than 100 ppmv (no limit on HC); or

• Control of HC in the bypass to less than 20 ppmv (no limit on CO).

Note that for kilns with bypasses, there is no current regulatory requirement for controlling stack emissions of either CO or HC, therefore there is no associated MACT floor at the stack for either

CO or HC.

3.7.2.1 Main Stack

# 3-16 Hydrocarbons — Tables 3-22 and 3-23 summarize HC (RA) and HC (MHRA) stack gas emissions from CKs. HC (MHRA) condition averages range from 5 to 100 ppmv. HC stack gas levels may be due to generation from both the main flame and waste combustion and from low temperature desorption from raw materials as they heat up in the counter-current CK operation. Thus, HCs in the main stack can be controlled through both the use of good combustion practices at

the main flame burner and waste combustion locations and use of raw materials that are low in organic content.

The definition of MACT for HC in CKs ideally may include the use of raw materials with low organics content and/or combustion related parameters of the main flame burner and waste combustion locations. However, due to the absence of this type of information, the definition of MACT and screening of the universe to identify the MACT EU was not performed. Instead, the floor is proposed at the current EPA RCRA BIF standard of 20 ppmv. Note that most of the kilns are able to comply with the current BIF standard of 20 ppmv based on the BIF trial burn compliance tests contained in the EPA HWC emissions database. However, the database does contain some facilities with levels above the 20 ppmv standard. This is because under the original BIF rule, a site specific HC limit was allowed where HC emissions could exceed 20 ppmv; under this compliance option it had to be demonstrated that the HC emissions levels were not influenced (increased) by the addition of burning hazardous wastes compared with baseline non-hazardous waste burning HC levels. However, subsequent litigation vacated this option provided in the original BIF rule. Since these BIF trial burn compliance tests, five kilns that were unable to meet the 20 limit have taken steps to reduce their HC emissions below 20 ppmv by either raw material substitution of the problematic feed stream(s) or improved combustion at the hot end.

Carbon Monoxide — It is inappropriate to set a limit on stack gas CO levels for CKs. CO that is present in the flue gas at the main stack may be generated from conditions unrelated to the combustion efficiency of the burning of hazardous wastes and fuel at the hot-end main flame, therefore CO can not be used as an indicator of the combustion efficiency. Instead, CO may be generated from the internal kiln process chemistry involving both limestone calcination which produces high levels of CO 2 

# which dissociates at high sintering conditions and low temperature evolution from organics in raw material feedstocks. Tables 3-24 and 3-25 summarize CO (RA) and CO (MHRA) levels from hazardous waste burning CKs. CO (MHRA) condition average levels range widely, from 50 to 3,000 ppmv. Only a couple of the facilities were able to certify compliance with the BIF CO standard of 100; instead, they complied with the alternative standard that allowed CO to exceed 100 if the HC was below 20 ppmv.

4.7.2.1 Bypass Stack

Most preheater and preheater/precalciner arrangement cement kilns are equipped with bypass ducts where a portion (typically 5 to 30%) of the kiln exhaust is diverted to a separate air pollution control device, and sometimes, to a separate stack. The gases are diverted to avoid the build-up of alkali metal salts that adversely affect the kiln operation.

Unlike the stack gas, the bypass stack gas HC and CO levels may be representative of kiln combustion efficiency (not affected by raw materials desorption at low temperature and resulting

# 3-17 evolution of unburned HC and CO, or CO formation from high temperature calcination process). Tables 3-26 through 3-29 summarize bypass pass data for HC and CO (also shown in Figures 3-6 through 3-9). As like the current EPA RCRA BIF regulation, bypass stack standards are set on both CO and HC; however, also like BIF, compliance can be achieved by meeting either one of the limits. A MACT HC bypass stack floor standard is determined to be 6.7 ppmv with a corresponding design level of 5.1 ppmv (based on a statistical analysis of the MACT EU determined as all sources with condition averages below the “breakpoint” source 316C2, shown in Figure 3-7). A MACT CO bypass stack floor level of 100 ppmv is proposed; this is based on the current BIF standard. All

but one kiln can meet the HC level. Half of the kilns can meet the CO level.

3.7.3 Light W eight Aggregate Kilns

3.7.3.1 Hydrocarbons

Tables 3-30 and 3-31 summarize HC (RA) and HC (MHRA) emissions from LWAKs. HC (MHRA) levels range from 3 to 13 ppmv (also shown in Figures 3-10 and 3-11. The BIF rule limits HC levels to 20 ppmv when CO exceeds 100 ppmv. HCs are controlled from LWAKs, exactly like that discussed for CKs, by maintaining combustion efficiency (good combustion practices) at the main flame burner and utilizing raw materials low in organics content. The best performing sources use good combustion practices to control HC. However, like incinerators and CKs, MACT has not been quantitatively defined. Based on an evaluation of the entire set of HC (MHRA) data, a breakpoint at source 312C1 with a condition average of 6 ppmv is determined; sources with higher condition averages are not considered to use MACT. Based on the statistical evaluation of the MACT EU (consisting of all conditions with averages less than 6 ppmv), a MACT floor design level of 6.4 ppmv and a MACT standard of 14 ppmv is determined. All but one LWAK facility currently meets this standard. It is not clear if the elevated HC levels are caused by operating under poor combustion conditions or from high levels of organics from the raw materials.

3.7.3.2 Carbon Monoxide

Tables 3-32 and 3-33 summarizes CO (RA) and CO (MHRA) emissions from LWAKs. CO (MHRA) levels range from 3 to 1,300 ppmv (also shown in Figures 3-12 and 3-13. The BIF rule currently limits the emissions of CO from LWAKs to 100 ppmv; however, the BIF rule provides an alternative standard that allow higher CO levels if HC levels are less than 20 ppmv. CO in LWAKs is controlled by maintaining good combustion conditions at the main flame burner and waste burning locations. The best performing sources control CO by maintaining good combustion conditions; however, like discussed for incinerators, MACT has not been quantitatively defined. Evaluation of the plot of all CO (MHRA) data in Figure 3-13 shows a curve discontinuity at a source test condition average of about 120 ppmv (source 310C1). All source conditions with levels above 120 ppmv are not considered to be using MACT (only one source test condition). Statistical analysis of the resulting MACT EU provided a MACT floor design level of 120 and a MACT standard of 270 ppmv. All except one of existing sources can meet this level.

# 3-18 3.8 SUMMARY OF EXISTING SOURCE FLOOR LEVELS

The MACT floor design and standard levels based on the statistical analysis of the MACT EU for existing sources are summarized in Table 3-34. Note that these levels have not been selected in all cases as being representative of the MACT floor. See the preamble of this rule for a discussion of the proposed MACT floor levels.

3.9 PLOTS OF ENTIRE UNIVERSE AND MACT EXPANDED UNIVERSES

Plots of the entire universes for each HAP and source category combination, as well as plots of the 6% MACT floor expanded universes, are shown in Appendix F, ranked by condition average. These plots are graphical presentations of the Tables in this section.

# 3-19TABLE 3-1. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS APCS PMAPCDStack Gas Conc (ng/dscm)CommentsType Cond IDClassTemp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ INC 347C2C/QC/VS/S/DM w 163 0.00 0.00 0.00MACT source (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 347C1C/QC/VS/S/DM w 163 0.01 0.01 0.00Source already in MACT poolD/F TEQ INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT w0.01 0.01 0.01MACT source (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS w0.01 0.02 0.01MACT source (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 706C3 QT/HS/C w0.01 0.01 0.01In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C8 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d0.02 0.02 0.01In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES w0.02 0.02 0.01In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C9 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d0.02 0.06 0.01In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 347C3C/QC/VS/S/DM w 164 0.03 0.03 0.02In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 706C2 QT/HS/C w0.03 0.03 0.02In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM w 1920.03 0.03 0.03In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C7 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 3830.03 0.04 0.02In: MACT EU (dry w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 347C4C/QC/VS/S/DM w 161 0.04 0.04 0.04In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM w 1910.04 0.05 0.04In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 331C1 PT/IWS w0.06 0.11 0.02In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C5 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 3830.07 0.10 0.04In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 3590.07 0.08 0.06In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 214C1 IWS w 1050.10 0.19 0.04In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C4SS/PT/VS w 0.10 0.10 0.10In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 346C1C/QC/VS/PT/DM w 178 0.13 0.14 0.11In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 808C1 QT/PBS/ESP w0.15 0.18 0.13In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 1001C1 ? ?0.16 0.28 0.07Out: Unknown APCSD/F TEQ INC 725C1WS/QT w0.17 0.25 0.06In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 353C2QC/VS/DM/ESP w 0.17 0.27 0.12In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C2SS/PT/VS w 0.20 0.20 0.20In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C4 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 3810.22 0.45 0.15In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 915C2QC/VS/C w 0.24 0.32 0.18In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM w0.25 0.35 0.19In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C1SS/PT/VS w 0.39 0.39 0.39In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM w0.40 0.60 0.16In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM w0.56 0.99 0.28In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C3SS/PT/VS w 0.63 0.63 0.63In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 915C3QC/VS/C w 0.68 0.84 0.57In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 334C1WS/ESP/PT w 0.69 1.23 0.34In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 327C4SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 400 0.76 0.95 0.57In: MACT EU (dry APCS < 400°F)D/F TEQ INC 221C5SS/PT/VS w 0.78 0.78 0.78In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 3841.21 1.70 0.82In: MACT EU (dry APCS < 400°F)

# 3-20TABLE 3-1. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS APCS PMAPCDStack Gas Conc (ng/dscm) CommentsType Cond IDClassTemp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ INC 327C5SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 460 1.31 2.00 0.90Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 325C9 SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 4302.02 2.30 1.75Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 325A2 SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 4602.13 2.20 2.00Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 3792.22 2.62 1.50In: MACT EU (dry APCS < 400°F)D/F TEQ INC 325C8 SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 4602.26 2.43 2.16Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 325A1SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 460 2.37 2.50 2.30Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 334C2WS/ESP/PT w 3.48 4.53 2.97In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 4113.61 4.86 1.88Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 914C1 ? ?4.39 4.39 4.39Out: Unknown ACPSD/F TEQ INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS w 5004.51 11.18 1.05In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS w 5008.02 11.19 3.14In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 327C3SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 457 8.50 10.90 7.15Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 327C2SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 450 18.36 22.86 13.34Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 327C1SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 450 20.10 27.50 10.99Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM w33.47 76.46 9.45In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM w 38.5473.22 3.85In: MACT EU (wet APCS)

# 3-21TABLE 3-2. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INDUSTRIAL KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS APCS PMAPCDStack Gas Conc (ng/dscm)CommentsType Cond IDClassTemp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ CK 208C1 ESP d 4090.00 0.01 0.00MACT source (409°F)D/F TEQ CK 207C1MC/ESP d 4180.02 0.02 0.02MACT source (418°F)D/F TEQ CK 205C3 ESP d 4700.02 0.03 0.02Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 315C2 FF d 4030.02 0.02 0.02MACT source (403°F)D/F TEQLWAK336C2 FF d 400 0.04 0.04 0.04In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 401C4 ESP d 2960.04 0.05 0.03In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 315C1 FF d 3410.04 0.04 0.04In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 402C3 ESP d 2760.04 0.05 0.04In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 206C4 ESP d 5300.04 0.06 0.03Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQLWAK336C1 FF d 400 0.04 0.05 0.04In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 401C3 ESP d 3790.04 0.05 0.04In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 316C2 FF d 4920.05 0.07 0.03Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 401C5 ESP d 3650.05 0.06 0.03In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 322C53 ESP d 3740.05 0.05 0.05In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 323C52 ESP d 3510.05 0.05 0.05Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 306C1MC/FF d 5470.05 0.06 0.05Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C52 ESP d 4970.06 0.09 0.04Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 323C50 ESP d 3600.07 0.17 0.04In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 322C54 ESP d 4550.09 0.09 0.08Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 320C1 FF d 4840.09 0.13 0.05Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 228C4 ESP d 3810.12 0.21 0.07In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 319C51 ESP d 5680.13 0.20 0.05Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 402C4 ESP d 3500.13 0.15 0.11In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 304C3 ESP d 4170.14 0.18 0.09Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 319C9 ESP d 4260.16 0.20 0.11Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 405C1 ESP d 2560.17 0.28 0.10In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 205C4 ESP d 4700.20 0.37 0.05Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK319B1 ESP d 4620.34 0.48 0.24Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 228C3 ESP d 4590.37 0.57 0.21Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C52 ESP d 4150.45 0.45 0.45In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 204C2 ESP d 5970.47 0.75 0.28Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 406C1 ESP d 3520.50 0.95 0.30In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 316C1 FF d 5070.58 1.54 0.09Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 335C50 ESP d 4000.59 0.62 0.56In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 319C54 ESP d 5180.60 0.61 0.60Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 319C53 ESP d 4990.62 1.11 0.32Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 323C51 ESP d 4000.79 0.91 0.67In: MACT EU

# 3-22TABLE 3-2. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INDUSTRIAL KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS APCS PMAPCDStack Gas Conc (ng/dscm) CommentsType Cond IDClassTemp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ CK 319C50 ESP d 5620.95 1.07 0.77Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C51 ESP d 4601.00 1.00 1.00Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 404C1 ESP d 4981.02 1.55 0.60Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 402C1 ESP d 4331.02 1.39 0.64Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 204C3 ESP d 5961.10 1.79 0.75Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 319C5 ESP d 4431.12 1.12 1.12Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 317C2 FF d 5051.13 1.16 1.06Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 317C3 FF d 5001.32 1.32 1.32Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 401C1 ESP d 4361.76 3.84 0.35Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 206C3 ESP d 5631.97 2.51 1.40Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 304C1 ESP d 5273.62 4.23 3.18Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C1 ESP d 5373.72 5.90 2.59Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 403C1 ESP d 4933.82 12.64 0.50Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 203C1 ESP d 3835.06 7.64 1.95In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 323C1 ESP d 4905.18 9.39 2.56Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C50 ESP d 5005.60 8.37 3.64Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C7 ESP d 4745.79 5.79 5.79Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C6 ESP d 5277.54 9.35 5.74Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 300C2 ESP d 608 10.97 13.206.63Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C2 ESP d 593 19.71 25.83 14.70Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 335C1 ESP d 718 32.42 50.52 21.82Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 305C3 ESP d 741 49.46 62.26 29.67Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 309C1MC/ESP d 641 49.8657.34 40.14Out: High APCD temperature

# 3-23TABLE 3-3. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS MTECStack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM INC 500C4 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Out: Source category outlierPM INC 337C1WHB/DA/DI/FF0.0003 0.0005 0.0002 MACT source (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.0005 0.0012 0.0001MACT source (VS/IWS)PM INC 350C2WHB/HE/FF0.0005 0.0007 0.0004Source already in MACT poolPM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006Out: HW not burnedPM INC 350C6WHB/HE/FF0.0006 0.0007 0.0005Source already in MACT poolPM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.0007 0.0008 0.0005Source already in MACT poolPM INC 350C3WHB/HE/FF0.0007 0.0015 0.0002 MACT source (FF, A/C=10.0)PM INC 350C9WHB/HE/FF0.0007 0.0013 0.0000Source already in MACT poolPM INC 350C5WHB/HE/FF0.0008 0.0009 0.0007Source already in MACT poolPM INC 350C4WHB/HE/FF0.0008 0.0012 0.0006Source already in MACT poolPM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.0009 0.0016 0.0005 MACT source (FF, A/C=3.0)PM INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.0009 0.0018 0.0004Source already in MACT poolPM INC 327C3SD/FF/WS/ESP0.0009 0.0015 0.0003 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.7)PM INC 350C8WHB/HE/FF0.0009 0.0012 0.0007 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=8.6)PM INC 349C3QC/FF/QC/PT0.0010 0.0015 0.0008 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.0)PM INC 338C2QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM0.0011 0.0017 0.0005 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM INC 349C2QC/FF/QC/PT0.0012 0.0017 0.0008 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.0012 0.0020 0.0008 Out: Not MACTPM INC 349C4QC/FF/QC/PT0.0012 0.0022 0.0005 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)PM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 0.0013 0.0020 0.0005Out: Not MACTPM INC 222C5 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.0013 0.0028 0.0008 In: MACT EUPM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 0.0013 0.0021 0.0006 In: MACT EU (FF/HEPA)PM INC 726C2 QC/CS/DM/VS 0.0013 0.0020 0.0010Out: Not MACTPM INC 338C1QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM0.0014 0.0020 0.0008 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM INC 354C3 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.0014 0.0017 0.0011 In: MACT EU (VS/IWS)PM INC 333C2SD/FF0.0014 0.0027 0.0005 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=9.9)PM INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM 0.0014 0.0020 0.0007 Out: Not MACTPM INC 209C7 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.0015 0.0021 0.0008 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 350C1WHB/HE/FF0.0016 0.0025 0.0010 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=9.2)PM INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.0016 0.0018 0.0015 Out: Not MACTPM INC 327C2SD/FF/WS/ESP0.0016 0.0027 0.0010 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.6)PM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.0017 0.0020 0.0010 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 0.0017 0.0032 0.0009 Out: Not MACT

# 3-24PM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 0.0017 0.0018 0.0016 Out: Not MACTPM INC 327C1SD/FF/WS/ESP0.0017 0.0025 0.0009 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.7)PM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.0019 0.0028 0.0012 Out: Not MACTPM INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.0019 0.0028 0.0010 In: MACT EUPM INC 333C1SD/FF0.0019 0.0046 0.0004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=9.7)PM INC 703C2 WHB 0.0020 0.0030 0.0010 Out: Not MACTPM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026Out: HW not burnedPM INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.0026 0.0034 0.0018 In: MACT EUPM INC 209C4 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.0026 0.0039 0.0001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.0)PM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 0.0026 0.0050 0.0010 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.0027 0.0035 0.0017 In: MACT EUPM INC 339C1AT/PT/RJS/ESP 0.0028 0.0033 0.0021In: MACT EUPM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 0.0030 0.0034 0.0027 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=7.6)PM INC 714C4 WS 0.0033 0.0040 0.0030 Out: Not MACTPM INC 904C2 ? 0.0033 0.0041 0.0029 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 222C7 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.0035 0.0060 0.0024 In: MACT EUPM INC 703C1 WHB 0.0037 0.0040 0.0030 Out: Not MACTPM INC 726C1 QC/CS/DM/VS 0.0037 0.0040 0.0030Out: Not MACTPM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.0037 0.0050 0.0030 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.0037 0.0040 0.0030 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 0.0038 0.0056 0.0022 Out: Not MACTPM INC 500C2 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.0038 0.0054 0.0017 Out: Not MACTPM INC 914C1 ? 0.0041 0.0042 0.0038 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 351C2GC/C/FF0.0045 0.0048 0.0039 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.8)PM INC 209C8 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.0046 0.0077 0.0027 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 600C2 WHB/QC/PT/IWS0.0047 0.0060 0.0040 Out: Not MACTPM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.0047 0.0060 0.0040 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 349C1QC/FF/QC/PT0.0048 0.0064 0.0032 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.1)PM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS0.0051 0.0068 0.0040 In: MACT EUPM INC 351C1GC/C/FF0.0054 0.0071 0.0045 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)PM INC 714C3 WS 0.0057 0.0060 0.0050 Out: Not MACTPM INC 400C1SD/FF0.0062 0.0080 0.0048 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 0.0063 0.0068 0.0056 Out: Not MACTPM INC 209C5 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.0068 0.0092 0.0037 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)TABLE 3-3. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTECStack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min

# 3-25TABLE 3-3. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTECStack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM INC 210C2 FF/S 0.0068 0.0125 0.0027 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.5)PM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS0.0074 0.0087 0.0051 In: MACT EUPM INC 209C3 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.0081 0.0122 0.0033 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 331C1 PT/IWS 0.0083 0.0100 0.0070 Out: Not MACTPM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 0.0084 0.0114 0.0052In: MACT EUPM INC 210C1 FF/S 0.0084 0.0184 0.0018 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.4)PM INC 211C1 FF/S 0.0085 0.0114 0.0038 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=4.1)PM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 0.0089 0.0127 0.0055 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=7.1)PM INC 714C2 WS 0.0093 0.0110 0.0080 Out: Not MACTPM INC 727C1GC/C/FF0.0103 0.0120 0.0090 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.2)PM INC 600C1WHB/QC/PT/IWS0.0103 0.0120 0.0080 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.0104 0.0117 0.0092 Out: Not MACTPM INC 808C2 QT/PBS/ESP 0.0109 0.0178 0.0067 In: MACT EUPM INC 209C6 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.0109 0.0171 0.0050 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.8)PM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.0110 0.0152 0.0044Out: Not MACTPM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 0.0111 0.0133 0.0096In: MACT EUPM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.0116 0.0135 0.0080Out: Not MACTPM INC 351C3GC/C/FF0.0121 0.0152 0.0084 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.5)PM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.0123 0.0126 0.0121 Out: Not MACTPM INC 221C5SS/PT/VS0.0125 0.0131 0.0122 Out: Not MACTPM INC 350C7WHB/HE/FF0.0127 0.0138 0.0119 Out: APCS bypassedPM INC 904C1 ? 0.0130 0.0153 0.0108 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 221C3SS/PT/VS0.0131 0.0193 0.0032 Out: Not MACTPM INC 324C3 ? 0.0135 0.0375 0.0043 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 351C4GC/C/FF0.0138 0.0153 0.0126 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.3)PM INC 708C3WS/ESP 0.0141 0.0173 0.0122In: MACT EUPM INC 359C1 WHB/FF/S 0.0141 0.0355 0.0056 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.5)PM INC 221C1SS/PT/VS0.0142 0.0160 0.0116 Out: Not MACTPM INC 221C2SS/PT/VS0.0147 0.0177 0.0126 Out: Not MACTPM INC 221C4SS/PT/VS0.0147 0.0205 0.0105 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C3QT/WS0.0149 0.0198 0.0097 Out: Not MACTPM INC 704C1 NONE 0.0153 0.0200 0.0110 Out: Not MACTPM INC 708C1WS/ESP 0.0158 0.0182 0.0122In: MACT EUPM INC 904C3 ? 0.0164 0.0282 0.0103 Out: Unknown APCS

# 3-26PM INC 710C1 QT/OS/C/S 0.0168 0.0177 0.0150Out: Not MACTPM INC 214C1 IWS 0.0172 0.0241 0.0086 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.0175 0.0200 0.0149 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C4 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.0175 0.0193 0.0157 Out: Not MACTPM INC 324C1 ? 0.0177 0.0712 0.0041 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 214C3 IWS 0.0190 0.0203 0.0178 Out: Not MACTPM INC 359C2 WHB/FF/S 0.0193 0.0435 0.0061 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.7)PM INC 216C7 HES/WS 0.0203 0.0286 0.0162 Out: Not MACTPM INC 504C1VS/C0.0209 0.0392 0.0126 Out: Not MACTPM INC 710C2 QT/OS/C/S 0.0214 0.0222 0.0207Out: Not MACTPM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 0.0214 0.0238 0.0194 Out: Not MACTPM INC 725C1WS/QT0.0215 0.0288 0.0159 Out: Not MACTPM INC 711C1C/VS/AS 0.0217 0.0290 0.0180Out: Not MACTPM INC 704C2 NONE 0.0220 0.0280 0.0140 Out: Not MACTPM INC 712C2 NONE 0.0221 0.0267 0.0197 Out: Not MACTPM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.0222 0.0261 0.0195 Out: Not MACTPM INC 702A3 QT/S/C 0.0223 0.0230 0.0210Out: Not MACTPM INC 212C1 FF/S 0.0224 0.0236 0.0200 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=4.1)PM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 0.0227 0.0261 0.0159 Out: Not MACTPM INC 324C2 ? 0.0233 0.0712 0.0047 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 915C3 QC/VS/C 0.0237 0.0370 0.0150Out: Not MACTPM INC 357C1 QC/VS/PT/IWS 0.0249 0.0327 0.0177 In: MACT EU (VS/IWS)PM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.0255 0.0258 0.0252 Out: Not MACTPM INC 354C4 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.0255 0.0366 0.0167 In: MACT EU (VS/IWS)PM INC 358C2 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.0260 0.0288 0.0245Out: Not MACTPM INC 701C2VS/PT 0.0261 0.0272 0.0243Out: Not MACTPM INC 359C3 WHB/FF/S 0.0264 0.0663 0.0058 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.7)PM INC 358C4 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.0268 0.0273 0.0262Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C6 HES/WS 0.0268 0.0335 0.0218 Out: Not MACTPM INC 808C1 QT/PBS/ESP 0.0273 0.0597 0.0089 In: MACT EUPM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 0.0277 0.0320 0.0250 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.5)PM INC 214C2 IWS 0.0277 0.0338 0.0171 Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C1 HES/WS 0.0277 0.0295 0.0263 Out: Not MACTPM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.0279 0.0395 0.0219 Out: Not MACTPM INC 706C3 QT/HS/C 0.0284 0.0337 0.0253 Out: Not MACTTABLE 3-3. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSyst EPA APCS MTECStack Gas Conc (gr/dscf)CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min

# 3-27TABLE 3-3. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSyst EPA APCS MTECStack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM INC 706C3 QT/HS/C 0.0284 0.0337 0.0253 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C7QT/WS0.0285 0.0300 0.0259 Out: Not MACTPM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 0.0287 0.0350 0.0240 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.2)PM INC 324C4 ? 0.0290 0.1152 0.0048 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscf, Unknown APCSPM INC 700C2 SD/RJS/VS/WS 0.0301 0.0334 0.0283Out: Not MACTPM INC 806C2C/VS0.0307 0.0314 0.0301 Out: Not MACTPM INC 329C1 PT/IWS 0.0311 0.0368 0.0267 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.0313 0.0350 0.0275 Out: Not MACTPM INC 711C2C/VS/AS 0.0313 0.0490 0.0220Out: Not MACTPM INC 356C1 QC/AS/FN/S/DM 0.0323 0.0350 0.0310Out: Not MACTPM INC 707A2 QT/WS0.0327 0.0381 0.0280 Out: Not MACTPM INC 358C1 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.0330 0.0361 0.0305Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C5 HES/WS 0.0331 0.0408 0.0265 Out: Not MACTPM INC 701C1VS/PT 0.0332 0.0384 0.0283Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C2QT/WS0.0337 0.0358 0.0303 Out: Not MACTPM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.0340 0.0492 0.0221 Out: Not MACTPM INC 714C5 WS 0.0347 0.0400 0.0280 Out: Not MACTPM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 0.0360 0.0400 0.0330 Out: Not MACTPM INC 906C5 QT/PT 0.0360 0.0430 0.0290 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C4QT/WS0.0367 0.0378 0.0361 Out: Not MACTPM INC 784C1 NONE 0.0370 0.0390 0.0340 Out: Not MACTPM INC 712C1 NONE 0.0377 0.0667 0.0228 Out: Not MACTPM INC 706C1 QT/HS/C 0.0379 0.0404 0.0344 Out: Not MACTPM INC 714C1 WS 0.0380 0.0440 0.0320 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C1QT/WS0.0381 0.0486 0.0262 Out: Not MACTPM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0.0383 0.0546 0.0239Out: MACT ESP (Poor D/O/M)PM INC 702A2QT/S/C 0.0417 0.0510 0.0280Out: Not MACTPM INC 710C3 QT/OS/C/S 0.0422 0.0443 0.0383Out: Not MACTPM INC 358C3 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.0429 0.0448 0.0411Out: Not MACTPM INC 711C3C/VS/AS 0.0430 0.0450 0.0390Out: Not MACTPM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0.0433 0.1003 0.0127Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 728C1 QT/PT/VS 0.0436 0.0453 0.0425 Out: Not MACTPM INC 784C2 NONE 0.0443 0.0470 0.0420 Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C4 HES/WS 0.0443 0.0510 0.0320 Out: Not MACT

# 3-28TABLE 3-3. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS MTECStack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM INC 707C8QT/WS0.0449 0.0471 0.0426 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707A1 QT/WS0.0456 0.0486 0.0426 Out: Not MACTPM INC 353C3 QC/VS/DM/ESP 0.0466 0.0492 0.0449Out: MACT ESP (CO - 353C1, poor D/O/M)PM INC 702A1 QT/S/C 0.0467 0.0530 0.0430Out: Not MACTPM INC 708C2WS/ESP 0.0490 0.0686 0.0332Out: Not MACTPM INC 709C1 NONE 0.0505 0.1060 0.0140 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 805C1 QT/QS/VS/ES/PBS 0.0544 0.0577 0.0489 Out: Not MACTPM INC 806C1C/VS0.0560 0.0644 0.0444 Out: Not MACTPM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 0.0572 0.0609 0.0525Out: Not MACTPM INC 334C2WS/ESP/PT 0.0575 0.0746 0.0395Out: MACT ESP (Poor D/O/M)PM INC 915C2 QC/VS/C 0.0580 0.0620 0.0520Out: Not MACTPM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 0.0593 0.0632 0.0566 Out: Not MACTPM INC 706C2 QT/HS/C 0.0618 0.0660 0.0565 Out: Not MACTPM INC 334C1WS/ESP/PT 0.0624 0.1070 0.0368Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 713C1VS/PT 0.0649 0.0684 0.0589Out: Not MACTPM INC 825C1CCS/QC/ESP0.0650 0.0800 0.0300 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C1 QT/PT 0.0660 0.0930 0.0480 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 701C3VS/PT 0.0694 0.0784 0.0601Out: Not MACTPM INC 915C4 QC/VS/C 0.0707 0.0760 0.0660Out: Not MACTPM INC 702C7 QT/S/C 0.0715 0.1070 0.0414Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C3 QT/PT 0.0723 0.0750 0.0680 Out: Not MACTPM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C 0.0763 0.0780 0.0740Out: Not MACTPM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 0.0767 0.0954 0.0569 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C4 QT/PT 0.0870 0.0940 0.0760 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C2 QT/PT 0.0893 0.1140 0.0760 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 702C6 QT/S/C 0.0900 0.1040 0.0805Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 702C8 QT/S/C 0.1095 0.1321 0.0810Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 332C1 WS 0.1137 0.1331 0.0970 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 727C2GC/C/FF0.1567 0.2160 0.1000 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 702C9 QT/S/C 0.1879 0.1893 0.1864Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 707C9QT/WS1.9014 5.5901 0.0292 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscf

# 3-29TABLE 3-4. PM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS MTECStack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM CK 315C2 FF 0.001 0.001 0.000 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.8)PM CK 315C1 FF 0.001 0.001 0.001 Source already in MACT poolPM CK 317C3 FF 0.002 0.004 0.001Out: HW not burnedPM CK 317C1 FF 0.002 0.003 0.002 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.3)PM CK 317C2 FF 0.003 0.004 0.003Source already in MACT poolPM CK 320C1 FF 0.003 0.006 0.001 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.3)PM CK 404C2 ESP 0.004 0.005 0.004 Out: Not MACTPM CK 404C1 ESP 0.007 0.018 0.004 Out: Not MACTPM CK 318C2 ESP 0.010 0.011 0.008 Out: Not MACTPM CK 30151 FF 0.011 0.0170.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)PM CK 316C1 FF 0.011 0.012 0.010 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM CK 316C2 FF 0.012 0.013 0.012 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM CK 200C1 FF 0.014 0.016 0.011 Out: MACT (FF), High A/CPM CK 203C1 ESP 0.014 0.017 0.011 Out: Not MACTPM CK 208C1 ESP 0.014 0.015 0.012 Out: Not MACTPM CK 208C2 ESP 0.016 0.025 0.011 Out: Not MACTPM CK 306C1MC/FF 0.016 0.023 0.012In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)PM CK 207C2MC/ESP0.018 0.024 0.010 Out: Not MACTPM CK 406C1 ESP 0.019 0.026 0.015 Out: Not MACTPM CK 322C1 ESP 0.019 0.033 0.011 Out: Not MACTPM CK 308C1 ESP 0.021 0.024 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM CK 323C1 ESP 0.022 0.033 0.005 Out: Not MACTPM CK 202C1 FF 0.022 0.025 0.020 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.9)PM CK 309C2MC/ESP 0.023 0.035 0.013 Out: Not MACTPM CK 206C1 ESP 0.023 0.029 0.015 Out: Not MACTPM CK 303C1QC/FF 0.023 0.025 0.021 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.2)PM CK 335C1 ESP 0.023 0.033 0.017 Out: Not MACTPM CK 303C2QC/FF0.024 0.026 0.023 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.3)PM CK 309C1MC/ESP 0.026 0.029 0.022Out: Not MACTPM CK 207C1MC/ESP 0.0280.032 0.026 Out: Not MACTPM CK 204C1 ESP 0.028 0.032 0.024 Out: Not MACTPM CK 202C2 FF 0.031 0.042 0.025 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.9)PM CK 403C2 ESP 0.031 0.039 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM CK 402C1 ESP 0.033 0.049 0.022 Out: Not MACTPM CK 302C1 ESP 0.034 0.060 0.020 Out: Not MACTPM CK 405C1 ESP 0.035 0.065 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM CK 403C1 ESP 0.035 0.049 0.025 Out: Not MACT

# 3-30PM CK 201C1 FF 0.036 0.109 0.008 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 319C1 ESP 0.037 0.040 0.034 Out: Not MACTPM CK 30141 FF 0.039 0.053 0.029 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM CK 30143 FF0.041 0.046 0.031 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=0.9)PM CK 401C4 ESP 0.041 0.051 0.030 Out: Not MACTPM CK 401C1 ESP 0.048 0.061 0.038 Out: Not MACTPM CK 401C3 ESP 0.049 0.053 0.042 Out: Not MACTPM CK 30153 FF 0.050 0.078 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.6)PM CK 205C1 ESP 0.050 0.058 0.045 Out: Not MACTPM CK 304C1 ESP 0.057 0.064 0.049 Out: Not MACTPM CK 305C1 ESP 0.064 0.072 0.053 Out: Not MACTPM CK 300C1 ESP 0.071 0.083 0.057 Out: Not MACT, > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 305C3 ESP 0.074 0.075 0.072 Out: Not MACTPM CK 401C5 ESP 0.077 0.105 0.063 Out: Not MACT, > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 305C2 ESP 0.080 0.086 0.075 Out: Not MACT, > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 402C5 ESP 0.085 0.119 0.064 Out: Not MACT, > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 321C1 ESP 0.210 0.490 0.035 Out: Not MACT, > 0.08 gr/dscfTABLE 3-4. PM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTECStack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min

# 3-31TABLE 3-5. PM, LWAKs, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTECStack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM LWAK225C1 FF 0.000 0.001 0.000 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5)PM LWAK227C1 FF 0.001 0.002 0.001 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.8)PM LWAK226C1 FF 0.002 0.004 0.001Source already in MACT poolPM LWAK223C1 FF 0.004 0.008 0.002Source already in MACT poolPM LWAK224C1 FF 0.005 0.009 0.002Source already in MACT poolPM LWAK311C1 FF 0.006 0.007 0.004 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.9)PM LWAK307C4FF/VS 0.007 0.008 0.006Out: MACT (FF), High A/CPM LWAK313C1 FF 0.007 0.008 0.006 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4)PM LWAK307C1FF/VS0.008 0.012 0.006 Out: MACT (FF), High A/CPM LWAK336C1 FF 0.009 0.011 0.007 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM LWAK312C1 FF 0.010 0.018 0.005 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)PM LWAK307C2FF/VS 0.010 0.016 0.006 Out: MACT (FF), High A/CPM LWAK310C1 FF 0.018 0.026 0.013 Out: MACT (FF), High A/CPM LWAK307C3FF/VS0.022 0.037 0.013 Out: MACT (FF), High A/CPM LWAK314C1 FF 0.022 0.029 0.012 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4)

# 3-32TABLE 3-6. MERCURY, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury INC221C5SS/PT/VS 51.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 99.90MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 5.1e1)Mercury INC221C3SS/PT/VS 35.2 0.1 0.2 0.099.70Source already in MACT poolMercury INC216C7 HES/WS 0.3 0.3 0.2 Out: No MTECMercury INC346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 0.4 0.7 0.2Out: No MTECMercury INC347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.5 0.5 0.5Out: No MTECMercury INC824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 5.1 0.8 1.0 0.6 84.95MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 5.1e0)Mercury INC341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA18.5 0.9 1.0 0.9 94.93MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.9e1)Mercury INC216C5 HES/WS 1.0 1.7 0.1 Out: No MTECMercury INC503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 1.2 1.5 0.8 Out: No MTECMercury INC341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 8.6 1.3 2.2 0.9 84.26 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury INC354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1861.7 1.4 3.4 0.6 99.92 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC725C1WS/QT 1.7 1.8 1.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 2.5 5.3 1.1Out: No MTECMercury INC209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 234.1 2.5 2.6 2.598.91 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0.1 2.8 6.1 0.4 -4963.30 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 106.1 2.9 3.4 2.3 97.29 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 253.8 3.1 4.5 0.3 98.76 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 3.4 3.4 3.4Out: No MTECMercury INC334C2WS/ESP/PT 37.8 4.0 6.4 1.8 89.43In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 4.1 11.3 1.5Out: No MTECMercury INC221C1SS/PT/VS 8.5 4.3 5.8 1.948.99In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC330C1 QT/WS/DM 0.1 4.6 4.7 4.5 -6107.24 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 9.4 4.7 6.0 3.6 50.34In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.7 5.3 6.8 3.4 -638.81 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC330C2 QT/WS/DM 0.2 5.8 8.3 3.2 -2980.36 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 6.2 7.7 4.4 Out: No MTECMercury INC353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 6.5 7.9 5.4Out: No MTECMercury INC340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 182.6 7.6 9.4 5.7 95.85 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC334C1WS/ESP/PT 296.9 9.9 16.0 7.3 96.68Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM14.3 10.7 20.1 1.2 24.89In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 135.712.3 13.9 10.1 90.92Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 16.1 22.4 12.0Out: No MTECMercury INC807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 1.817.9 18.4 17.5-894.48 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC221C4SS/PT/VS 15.4 19.2 34.7 7.3-24.26 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 9.3 19.3 30.1 3.8-107.56 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC400C1SD/FF27680.5 19.4 26.4 15.7 99.93Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury INC325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 52.1 25.2 43.2 11.4 51.72Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC

# 3-33TABLE 3-6. MERCURY, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS MTECStack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury INC325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 95.8 27.1 30.3 22.0 71.67Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC221C2SS/PT/VS 30.2 27.2 50.0 10.7 9.64In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC338C1QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 27.7 43.3 8.2Out: No MTECMercury INC325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 263.1 30.1 44.8 19.8 88.56Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC214C3 IWS 3357.9 31.7 46.5 22.5 99.06Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC331C1 PT/IWS38.8 52.3 18.6Out: No MTECMercury INC503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF42.9 94.0 4.6Out: No MTECMercury INC325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 60.1 44.4 65.6 8.4 26.17Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/M (CO - 325C6/5)Mercury INC216C6 HES/WS 44.6 106.3 11.9Out: No MTECMercury INC902C1 QT/VS/PT 32.3 47.7 54.4 42.1-47.88 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC214C2 IWS 70348.9 48.8 90.3 19.2 99.93Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC338C2QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 89.6 103.3 75.9Out: No MTECMercury INC806C2C/VS 117.8 146.2 84.5Out: No MTECMercury INC806C1C/VS 172.6 195.5 129.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS 177.8 517.2 6.6 Out: No MTECMercury INC337C1WHB/DA/DI/FF69.7 188.1 278.8 146.5-170.11 Out: MACT (FC), MB problemMercury INC216C3 HES/WS 261.0 679.9 37.5Out: No MTECMercury INC327C2SD/FF/WS/ESP 75.6 394.5 570.1 285.4-421.63 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC214C1 IWS 481.6 784.0 128.8 Out: No MTECMercury INC327C3SD/FF/WS/ESP 123.31121.5 2396.7 154.1 -809.79 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC504C1VS/C2146.1 1322.7 2342.9 77.8 38.37Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC327C1SD/FF/WS/ESP 477.41360.7 2067.9 563.9 -185.04 Out: MACT (WS), MB problem

# 3-34TABLE 3-7. MERCURY, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury CK303C1QC/FF 0 3 4 3 98.42Out: HW not burnedMercury CK404C1 ESP 28 4 7 2 89.73 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 2.8e1)Mercury CK305C3 ESP 129872 5 7 4 100.00 Out: MB problemMercury CK201C1 FF 5 15 1 Out: No MTECMercury CK203C1 ESP 10 6 6 6 85.58MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.1e1)Mercury CK406C1 ESP 108 8 16 5 93.43MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.1e2)Mercury CK200C1 FF 11 21 3 Out: No MTECMercury CK305C1 ESP 29 16 18 13 92.88 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK207C1MC/ESP 6 17 22 13 84.16In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK206C1 ESP 19 17 23 13 99.92 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK204C1 ESP 5 19 24 15 82.06 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK402C1 ESP 118 19 38 8 99.81 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK208C1 ESP 6 20 25 12 81.30 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK202C2 FF 7 20 22 18 64.43 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK405C1 ESP 153 21 26 12 87.72 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK205C1 ESP 10 30 37 23 48.91 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK401C5 ESP 47 36 50 19 37.73 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK304C1 ESP 9 42 52 28 56.53 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK309C1MC/ESP 88 43 54 36 71.80In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK402C4 ESP 33 51 70 39 -12.77 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK319C1 ESP 5 56 59 53 25.49 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK335C1 ESP 25813 60 100 39 99.77 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK303C3QC/FF 53 92 172 48 75.75In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK30152 FF 240 106 143 117 84.52 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK30142 FF 240 128 139 6981.27 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK401C1 ESP 545 148 382 44 73.36 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK403C1 ESP 62 1014 1598 719 -1237.61 Out: MB problem, DL measurementMercury CK306C1MC/FF3339 2988 4574 1048 22.11 Out: MACT (FC), High MTEC

# 3-35TABLE 3-8. MERCURY, LWAKs, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury LWAK313C1 FF 17 0 1 0 99.24 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.7e1)Mercury LWAK225C1 FF 3 5 6 3 67.38 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 2.9e0)Mercury LWAK312C1 FF 12 9 10 8 79.49 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.2e1)Mercury LWAK310C1 FF 11 15 20 11 60.35 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK311C1 FF 24 15 19 11 73.76 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK224C1 FF 10 16 19 14 44.80 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK227C1 FF 10 17 19 16 73.24 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK314C1 FF 63 22 25 16 80.74 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK223C1 FF 17 32 34 30 30.66 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK307C1FF/VS2328 422 456 32482.57 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK307C3FF/VS1991 472 511 431 77.15 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK307C4FF/VS2212 493 511 472 78.50 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK307C2FF/VS2142 561 760 403 74.69 Out: MACT (FC), High MTEC

# 3-36TABLE 3-9. SVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTECStack Gas Conc (μg/dscm)CommentsType Cond ID(μg/dscm)Avg Max MinSVM INC 325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1 2 1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 712C1 NONE 0 2 2 2 Out: MB problem, Sub. > 75%SVM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 48776 3 3 2 MACT source (VS/IWS w/ MTEC of 4.9e4) (FF or ESP as ET)SVM INC 712C2 NONE 1 3 4 2 Out: MB problem, Sub. > 75%SVM INC 222C5 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 3 6 2 Out: No MTECSVM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 168 4 5 2 MACT source (VS w/ MTEC of 1.7e2) (Any PM APCS as ET)SVM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 4 4 4Out: No MTECSVM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 5795 6 7 4 MACT source (ESP w/ MTEC of 5.8e3)SVM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 188533 7 8 6 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 495 10 11 10 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 129450 11 19 6 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 11 12 9Out: No MTECSVM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 12 13 9Out: No MTECSVM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 13 20 8Out: No MTECSVM INC 221C2SS/PT/VS4666 13 23 3 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 3786 13 20 9 In: MACT EU (ESP)SVM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 14 14 14Out: No MTECSVM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 403 17 24 10 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 21 30 13 Out: No MTECSVM INC 221C3SS/PT/VS2077 22 31 9 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 904 23 54 7 In: MACT EU (ET ESP)SVM INC 327C2SD/FF/WS/ESP3798 23 55 7 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 24 39 16 Out: No MTECSVM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 240 24 25 23 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 327C1SD/FF/WS/ESP11148 25 37 16 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 89 25 27 23 In: MACT EU (ET VS)SVM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1 27 31 23 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problem, Sub. > 85%, DL measurementSVM INC 338C1QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 28 31 24Out: No MTECSVM INC 221C5SS/PT/VS1290 29 39 23 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 338C2QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 31 34 28Out: No MTECSVM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 125 35 42 25 In: MACT EU (ET VS)SVM INC 327C3SD/FF/WS/ESP10366 37 57 21 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 725C1WS/QT 37 44 29 Out: No MTECSVM INC 349C3QC/FF/QC/PT532412 39 44 37 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTEC

# 3-37TABLE 3-9. SVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTECStack Gas Conc (μg/dscm)CommentsType Cond ID(μg/dscm)Avg Max MinSVM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 375 42 63 14 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 221C4SS/PT/VS 443 44 71 23Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 504C1VS/C14632 44 75 24 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 48240 56 77 40 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS10716 58 140 13 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1 64 71 57 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problemSVM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0 71 76 66 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problem, Sub. > 91%, DL measurementSVM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 89 114 63Out: No MTECSVM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS4884 91 163 54 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (325C7)SVM INC 337C1WHB/DA/DI/FF 45856 94 148 63 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 221C1SS/PT/VS 163 101 122 78In: MACT EU (VS)SVM INC 216C3 HES/WS 103 178 58 Out: No MTECSVM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0 116 163 66Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 214C1 IWS 201 384 75 Out: No MTECSVM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 210 335 128Out: No MTECSVM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS5805 225 472 91 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (325C7)SVM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 227 263 175 Out: No MTECSVM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 358 244 253 235 Out: Not MACTSVM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS4360 245 366 115 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (325C7)SVM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 174720 262 370 206 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 153 301 484 199Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 230683 312 429 233 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 332 522 191 Out: No MTECSVM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 108 418 494 324 Out: Not MACT, MB problemSVM INC 806C2C/VS 461 496 391Out: No MTECSVM INC 324C1 ? 537 1532 95 Out: No MTECSVM INC 806C1C/VS 591 726 444Out: No MTECSVM INC 400C1SD/FF2538985 656 813 407 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 214C2 IWS 151644 689 905 328 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECSVM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 302756 721 722 719 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 216C7 HES/WS 826 1076 404 Out: No MTECSVM INC 324C4 ? 838 2108 121 Out: No MTECSVM INC 809C1 VS 20803 865 991 766 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 810C1 Q/VS/PBS 56371 882 1095 522 Out: MACT (VS), High MTEC

# 3-38SVM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 68334 911 1220 694 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 993 1402 547 Out: No MTECSVM INC 214C3 IWS 343542 1000 1322 446 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECSVM INC 216C5 HES/WS 1021 1279 778 Out: No MTECSVM INC 216C6 HES/WS 1045 1279 771 Out: No MTECSVM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C1284 1582 1043 Out: No MTECSVM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 1509 2247 1016 Out: No MTECSVM INC 334C2WS/ESP/PT 5661706 2575 952 Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 810C2 Q/VS/PBS 653523 1777 2041 1399 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 324C2 ? 3040 18083 158 Out: No MTECSVM INC 331C1 PT/IWS 3465 4705 1992 Out: No MTECSVM INC 334C1WS/ESP/PT122029 7964 13516 3413 Out: MACT (WS/ESP), High MTECSVM INC 324C3 ? 8262 53289 152 Out: No MTECSVM INC 809C2 VS 205717 19769 23051 16802 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS222057 29350 37804 24633 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 905C1 QT/VS/AS/CS 13398 29761 39956 23066 Out: MACT (VS), MB problemTABLE 3-9. SVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTECStack Gas Conc (μg/dscm)CommentsType Cond ID(μg/dscm)Avg Max Min

# 3-39TABLE 3-10. SVM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM CK 320C1 FF 33453 3.6 6.5 2.1 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.1, w/ MTEC of 3.6e4)SVM CK 316C2 FF 65771 5.6 7.6 4.0 Source already in MACT poolSVM CK 316C1 FF 83491 6.2 6.8 5.5 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.2, w/ MTEC of 8.4e4)SVM CK 30142 FF 76266 8.612.3 6.2MACT source (FF, A/C=1.3, w/ MTEC of 7.6e4)SVM CK 321C1 ESP 20702911.4 22.4 5.1Out: Not MACTSVM CK 303C1QC/FF1300012.9 13.7 11.6In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.2)SVM CK 30152 FF 7626614.8 29.1 4.3In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.6)SVM CK 306C1MC/FF4872616.6 23.8 10.2In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)SVM CK 315C2 FF 15751118.3 26.6 14.0Out: MACT (FF), High MTECSVM CK 315C1 FF 16325621.1 34.2 13.9Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.6), High MTECSVM CK 317C1 FF 4272828.3 29.6 27.1In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.3)SVM CK 317C3 FF 0 28.8 28.9 28.7In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)SVM CK 317C2 FF 4218928.9 29.5 27.9In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.1)SVM CK 403C1 ESP 12728329.7 34.0 25.0Out: Not MACTSVM CK 303C3QC/FF2609632.5 38.3 21.9In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)SVM CK 404C1 ESP 6098257.4 67.5 49.3Out: Not MACTSVM CK 200C1 FF 2690562.0 70.7 41.3Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4), High A/CSVM CK 208C2 ESP 1515886.9 117.1 61.2Out: Not MACTSVM CK 308C1 ESP 2745793.2 106.9 82.9Out: Not MACTSVM CK 208C1 ESP 3094298.0 141.5 72.7Out: Not MACTSVM CK 202C2 FF 185075109.1 114.3 99.2Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.5), High MTECSVM CK 318C2 ESP 113263 140.1 164.3 126.5 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 322C1 ESP 137960 150.8 168.9134.6 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 207C2MC/ESP49680257.9 636.0 80.5Out: Not MACTSVM CK 206C1 ESP 164386 272.9 317.6229.7 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 401C1 ESP 74007 381.5704.0 218.7 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 204C1 ESP 212177 505.4 780.7 261.8 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 207C1MC/ESP82353 506.9 725.7312.3 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 203C1 ESP 158786528.3 613.3 420.6 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 309C1MC/ESP81002 543.1 747.9298.6 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 304C1 ESP 140000599.3 646.2 535.3 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 406C1 ESP 121721 661.7 932.4 437.4Out: Not MACT, DL measurementSVM CK 319C1 ESP 220000 677.8 1148.4261.2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 335C1 ESP 75279752.5 933.1 629.1 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 402C1 ESP 207994 814.8 1313.0380.8Out: Not MACT, DL measurementSVM CK 305C3 ESP 67136 897.3 1153.5 630.5 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 201C1 FF 172743 924.5 3553.7 43.8Out: MACT (FF), High MTEC

# 3-40SVM CK 323C1 ESP 145718 972.7 1340.5713.2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 205C1 ESP 139789 1169.4 1512.3 560.1 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 405C1 ESP 77813 1169.9 1912.3896.3 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 305C1 ESP 152835 1321.7 1697.9 1022.1 Out: Not MACT, DL measurementSVM CK 302C1 ESP 369251 1529.0 3030.2 677.3 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 401C5 ESP 148756 1966.2 4237.0622.6 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 300C2 ESP 455411 2345.3 4865.1 702.2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 402C4 ESP 45400 6047.0 6650.9 5511.6 Out: Not MACTTABLE 3-10. SVM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min

# 3-41TABLE 3-11. SVM, LWAKs, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM LWAK225C1 FF 270004 1 1 1 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5, w/ MTEC of 2.7e5)SVM LWAK307C4FF/VS53860 4 6 3 MACT source (FF/VS, A/C=4.2, w/ MTEC of 5.4e4)SVM LWAK224C1 FF 14691 4 5 3 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5, w/ MTEC of 1.5e4)SVM LWAK307C3FF/VS56984 4 7 2 Out: MACT (FF/VS, A/C = 4.4), High MTECSVM LWAK223C1 FF 731989 5 6 4 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.2), High MTECSVM LWAK307C2FF/VS51156 7 12 5 In: MACT EU (FF/VS, A/C = 4.4)SVM LWAK307C1FF/VS55659 10 15 7 Out: MACT (FF/VS, A/C=4.3), High MTECSVM LWAK227C1 FF 23904 31 60 12 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=2.8), High A/CSVM LWAK312C1 FF 457634 403 622 163 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.8), High MTECSVM LWAK310C1 FF 289 495 884 265 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=3.6), High A/C, MB problemSVM LWAK311C1 FF 374691 516 923 179 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.9), High MTECSVM LWAK313C1 FF 687282 663 1290 250 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.4), High MTECSVM LWAK314C1 FF 686565 1667 1835 1514 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.4), High MTEC

# 3-42TABLE 3-12. LVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1029 4 4 3 MACT source (VS w/ MTEC of 1.0e3) (Any PM control as ET)LVM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 6238 4 5 3 MACT source (IWS w/ MTEC of 6.2e3) (FF or ESP as ET)LVM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 4 7 2 Out: No MTECLVM INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM 4 5 4 Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C1GC/C/FF 6 9 5Out: No MTECLVM INC 806C2C/VS 7 10 6Out: No MTECLVM INC 325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS 7 8 6 Out: No MTECLVM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 7 9 5Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C2GC/C/FF 8 9 4Out: No MTECLVM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 1210 8 8 8 MACT source (FF w/ MTEC of 1.2e3)LVM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 8 8 8Out: No MTECLVM INC 806C1C/VS 9 11 7Out: No MTECLVM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 1439 10 10 9 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 26731 10 10 10 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 712C2 NONE 3 11 14 8 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 725 11 18 8 In: MACT EU (FF)LVM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 27853 11 12 10 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS5672 13 14 11 In: MACT EU (IWS)LVM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 248537 14 19 10 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 15 30 5Out: No MTECLVM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 17 17 17Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C3GC/C/FF 17 19 15Out: No MTECLVM INC 221C2SS/PT/VS1042 18 29 9 In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 327C3SD/FF/WS/ESP7559 20 22 18 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 327C2SD/FF/WS/ESP4589 23 34 16 In: MACT EU (ET IWS)LVM INC 221C3SS/PT/VS12504 28 41 7 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 1 28 38 22Out: MACT (VS), MB problemLVM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 29 34 19Out: No MTECLVM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 31 60 11Out: No MTECLVM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 215385 31 38 23 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTEC

# 3-43TABLE 3-12. LVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS7344 34 38 32 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 214C3 IWS 88167 34 51 20 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 327C1SD/FF/WS/ESP66578 38 42 32 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 50 40 43 37 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 699 41 48 37 In: MACT EU (ET VS)LVM INC 216C6 HES/WS 47 53 36 Out: No MTECLVM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS3204 48 64 39 In: MACT EU (IWS)LVM INC 331C1 PT/IWS 50 64 31 Out: No MTECLVM INC 725C1WS/QT 51 62 43 Out: No MTECLVM INC 216C5 HES/WS 51 59 38 Out: No MTECLVM INC 221C1SS/PT/VS 118 53 77 38In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 271671 56 65 50 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 712C1 NONE 1 56 103 30 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 214C2 IWS 57412 59 87 24 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1407 60 79 51 In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 12 63 67 55 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 58 65 85 34 Out: MACT (IWS), MB problemLVM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 804 66 81 51 In: MACT EU (ET VS)LVM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 251 68 72 64 In: MACT EU (ET VS)LVM INC 338C2QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 72 81 63Out: No MTECLVM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 588 77 80 75 In: MACT EU (ET VS)LVM INC 338C1QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 97 148 64Out: No MTECLVM INC 324C1 ? 98 164 53 Out: No MTECLVM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS3868 101 212 27 In: MACT EU (IWS)LVM INC 400C1SD/FF622484 102 126 70 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 324C2 ? 112 208 42 Out: No MTECLVM INC 324C3 ? 115 176 49 Out: No MTECLVM INC 216C7 HES/WS 121 135 97 Out: No MTECLVM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 8552 122 146 109 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 221C5SS/PT/VS9805 135 162 94 Out: MACT (VS), High MTEC

# 3-44LVM INC 221C4SS/PT/VS 501 145 333 45In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 35259 147 422 9 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 504C1VS/C73631 157 300 19 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 905C1 QT/VS/AS/CS 6832 181 197 162 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 239157 193 281 55 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 324C4 ? 194 527 47 Out: No MTECLVM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 198 335 129 Out: No MTECLVM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 367262 209 318 92 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 538274 246 308 175 Out: MACT (ET IWS), High MTECLVM INC 337C1WHB/DA/DI/FF 4247 261 431 167 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problemLVM INC 216C3 HES/WS 269 362 157 Out: No MTECLVM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 797 301 491 199Out: MACT (ET IWS), MB problemLVM INC 810C1 Q/VS/PBS 55023 321 457 146 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 214C1 IWS 339 460 198 Out: No MTECLVM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 353 960 38Out: No MTECLVM INC 809C1 VS 56047 397 469 353 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 334C2WS/ESP/PT6827 451 566 205 Out: MACT (ET IWS), High MTECLVM INC 915C4 QC/VS/C 612 898 446Out: No MTECLVM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 194079 634 752 548 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS6851 721 789 668 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 334C1WS/ESP/PT21901 820 2101 204 Out: MACT (ET IWS), High MTECLVM INC 810C2 Q/VS/PBS 2250207 836 921 758 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C 8731037 728 Out: No MTECLVM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 1064 1855 345 Out: No MTECLVM INC 809C2 VS 1332199 7224 7976 6552 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 10971 13042 8641 Out: No MTECLVM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 132678 157456 96750 Out: No MTECTABLE 3-12. LVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min

# 3-45TABLE 3-13. LVM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM CK 320C1 FF 25210 4 5 3 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.3, w/ MTEC of 2.5e4)LVM CK 316C2 FF 44108 5 6 4 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.2, w/ MTEC of 4.4e4)LVM CK 204C1 ESP 143982 6 7 5 MACT source (ESP, SCA=350, w/ MTEC of 1.4e5)LVM CK 308C1 ESP 29513 7 9 5 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=860)LVM CK 206C1 ESP 205763 9 9 8 Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 315C1 FF 258174 9 12 3 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 309C1MC/ESP106203 9 19 5 In: MACT EU (ESP)LVM CK 208C1 ESP 15357 10 11 8 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 303C3QC/FF25232 10 22 4 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)LVM CK 335C1 ESP 39270 11 11 11 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=420)LVM CK 315C2 FF 247408 11 11 11 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 316C1 FF 65167 11 14 9 In: MACT EU (FF)LVM CK 321C1 ESP 83779 11 24 4 In: MACT EU (ESP)LVM CK 306C1MC/FF231592 13 15 12 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 208C2 ESP 7115 14 26 6 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 30142 FF 23371 16 19 14 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.3)LVM CK 30152 FF 23371 17 22 13 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)LVM CK 205C1 ESP 171391 19 23 13 Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 318C2 ESP 15678 19 23 16 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=434)LVM CK 305C3 ESP 44058 20 21 20 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=340)LVM CK 317C1 FF 39252 23 25 23 In: MACT EU (FF)LVM CK 317C3 FF 0 23 24 24 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)LVM CK 317C2 FF 35645 24 24 23 In: MACT EU (FF)LVM CK 322C1 ESP 173846 24 29 16 Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 303C1QC/FF5610 25 39 18 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.3)LVM CK 401C5 ESP 15312 27 52 8 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=243)LVM CK 302C1 ESP 264797 27 43 19 Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 202C2 FF 120729 29 30 29 In: MACT EU (FF)LVM CK 203C1 ESP 47698 31 42 25 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=220)LVM CK 403C1 ESP 66049 34 37 32 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)LVM CK 305C1 ESP 86477 38 43 34 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=340), Poor D/O/M (low SCA)LVM CK 402C4 ESP 16212 50 59 40 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)LVM CK 207C2MC/ESP15408 55 294 6 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 304C1 ESP 170000 57 102 27 Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 207C1MC/ESP16590 57 160 9 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 319C1 ESP 15400 60 73 44 In: MACT EU (ESP)LVM CK 300C2 ESP 492419 102 197 38 Out: MACT (ESP), High MTEC

# 3-46TABLE 3-13. LVM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM CK 323C1 ESP 154346 127 244 62 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=238), High MTECLVM CK 404C1 ESP 167319 130 170 97 Out: MACT (ESP), High MTEC, DL measurementLVM CK 402C1 ESP 199783 162 167 155 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230), High MTEC, DL measureLVM CK 401C1 ESP 30735 173 182 162 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)LVM CK 406C1 ESP 105475 184 191 180 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=340), Poor D/O/M (low SCA)LVM CK 405C1 ESP 176599 304 351 267 Out: MACT (ESP), High MTEC, DL measurementLVM CK 200C1 FF 354752 367 451 248 Out: MACT (FF), High MTEC, DL measurementLVM CK 201C1 FF 295437 520 1124 263 Out: MACT (FF), High MTEC, DL measurement

# 3-47TABLE 3-14. LVM, LWAKs, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM LWAK225C1 FF 20344 10 12 9 Source already in MACT poolLVM LWAK224C1 FF 36730 22 30 17 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5, w/ MTEC of 3.7e4)LVM LWAK227C1 FF 6911 25 37 18 Source already in MACT poolLVM LWAK223C1 FF 33422 34 37 30 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.2, w/ MTEC of 3.3e4)LVM LWAK312C1 FF 46190 37 54 22 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.8, w/ MTEC of 4.6e4)LVM LWAK311C1 FF 40635 41 52 36 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.9)LVM LWAK310C1 FF 166 60 88 31 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=3.6), High A/CLVM LWAK307C1FF/VS54494 67 174 30 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.3), High A/CLVM LWAK307C3FF/VS49464 122 164 81 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.4), High A/CLVM LWAK307C4FF/VS52192 145 308 61 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.2), High A/CLVM LWAK307C2FF/VS50080 206 743 13 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.4), High A/CLVM LWAK314C1 FF 49552 227 317 162 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4)LVM LWAK313C1 FF 66835 289 329 245 Out: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4), High MTEC

# 3-48TABLE 3-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.1 0.1 0.1Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 358C2 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 1.11E+07 0.2 0.2 0.2 100.00MACT pool (VS/S MTEC of 1.1e7)Tot Cl INC 338C1QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 0.2 0.3 0.2Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 342C2 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 4.34E+06 0.3 0.3 0.299.99 MACT pool (VS/S w/ MTEC of 4.4e6)Tot Cl INC 706C3 QT/HS/C 1.73E+07 0.3 0.3 0.3 100.00 MACT pool (HS w/ MTEC of 1.7e7)Tot Cl INC 338C2QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 0.3 0.3 0.3Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 808C2 QT/PBS/ESP 2.09E+07 0.3 0.7 0.1 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 706C1 QT/HS/C 1.56E+07 0.4 0.5 0.2 100.00 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 354C3 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1.41E+07 0.4 0.4 0.3 100.00 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.4 0.5 0.3 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 337C2WHB/DA/DI/FF9.59E+04 0.4 0.5 0.3 99.37 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 728C1 QT/PT/VS 1.83E+07 0.4 0.8 0.0 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.5 1.6 0.1Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 600C1WHB/QC/PT/IWS3.05E+07 0.6 0.9 0.4 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 707C7QT/WS 0.6 0.7 0.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 358C3 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.22E+07 0.6 0.8 0.3 100.00Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 327C2SD/FF/WS/ESP 0.6 0.8 0.5Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 808C1 QT/PBS/ESP 2.58E+07 0.7 1.1 0.3 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 711C1C/VS/AS 9.09E+05 0.8 0.9 0.8 99.87In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 0.9 1.0 0.8Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 9.85E+07 0.9 1.1 0.6 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 711C2C/VS/AS 1.70E+05 0.9 1.0 0.8 99.21In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 706C2 QT/HS/C 1.73E+07 1.0 1.4 0.2 99.99 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 708C3WS/ESP 5.52E+07 1.0 2.3 0.3 100.00Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 214C3 IWS 5.05E+07 1.0 1.3 0.7 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 1.1 2.2 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 711C3C/VS/AS 7.78E+05 1.1 1.2 1.0 99.80In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 701C2VS/PT 1.1 2.3 0.4Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM 1.3 1.3 1.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 354C4 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1.3 2.2 0.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 708C2WS/ESP 6.22E+07 1.4 2.6 0.3 100.00Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 500C4 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.54E+07 1.4 2.4 0.9 99.99 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.19E+07 1.4 3.2 0.3 99.98In: MACT EU (WS)

# 3-49TABLE 3-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS MTECStack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 708C1WS/ESP 8.72E+07 1.4 2.7 0.8 100.00Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 1.6 1.9 1.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 327C3SD/FF/WS/ESP 1.7 3.3 0.5Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 707C1QT/WS 1.7 3.7 0.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 1.8 3.9 0.1Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 359C2 WHB/FF/S 2.24E+07 1.8 2.1 1.5 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 2.62E+06 1.8 2.1 1.5 99.90 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 600C2 WHB/QC/PT/IWS4.91E+07 1.8 2.4 0.8 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 325C8 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.8 4.9 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 2.84E+07 1.9 2.4 0.8 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 1.9 2.2 1.4 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 214C1 IWS 2.42E+07 1.9 2.0 1.8 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.85E+07 2.2 3.6 1.299.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 359C3 WHB/FF/S 1.60E+07 2.3 4.4 0.7 99.98 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 214C2 IWS 2.82E+07 2.3 3.0 2.0 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 3.33E+06 2.4 2.5 2.1 99.99In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 4.91E+06 2.4 2.7 1.8 99.93 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 209C4 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.13E+07 2.8 3.9 0.699.96In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC707A2 QT/WS7.75E+06 2.9 3.7 2.3 99.94 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 3.2 3.7 2.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.71E+06 3.4 5.0 1.7 99.71In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 3.5 3.7 3.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 359C1 WHB/FF/S 2.25E+07 3.5 7.0 1.1 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 4.0 4.4 3.3 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 825C1CCS/QC/ESP3.45E+07 4.0 8.4 2.1 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 700C2 SD/RJS/VS/WS 1.74E+06 4.2 5.2 3.5 99.65In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 7.19E+06 4.3 5.7 0.0 99.91 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 358C1 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.68E+07 4.3 11.3 0.5 99.99Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C7 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.36E+07 4.3 5.6 3.7 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C8 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 4.81E+07 4.4 6.7 1.999.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 707C8QT/WS 4.612.3 0.7Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 3.92E+07 4.6 6.1 2.6 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C5 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 2.72E+07 4.7 6.5 3.399.97 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC

# 3-50Tot Cl INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 4.9 4.9 4.9Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 504C1VS/C6.38E+04 5.1 11.4 0.1 89.37In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.93E+08 5.5 7.0 4.1 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 7.32E+06 5.6 7.0 3.6 99.89 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 209C6 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.65E+07 5.8 6.3 5.299.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 714C4 WS 4.65E+06 6.2 7.6 3.8 99.80In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 3.27E+06 6.4 12.8 0.3 99.71In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 8.92E+05 6.817.9 1.1 98.89Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC707A1 QT/WS 7.2 8.2 5.8 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 701C3VS/PT 7.2 8.0 5.9Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 357C1 QC/VS/PT/IWS 1.05E+07 7.5 10.3 5.0 99.90In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 707C9QT/WS8.17E+06 7.6 13.0 4.0 99.87In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 3.51E+06 7.7 11.4 4.3 99.97In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 707C2QT/WS6.48E+06 7.9 10.2 3.5 99.82In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 329C1 PT/IWS 2.00E+07 8.315.4 3.2 99.94In: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 358C4 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.39E+07 9.1 9.6 8.2 99.97Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 9.2 10.1 8.0Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 327C1SD/FF/WS/ESP 9.7 12.2 7.6Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 216C7 HES/WS 9.7 11.4 8.5Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 805C1 QT/QS/VS/ES/PBS 3.47E+06 10.0 15.0 7.4 99.58In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 216C2 HES/WS 10.4 11.5 8.6Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 221C3 PT 11.4 13.0 8.4Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 339C1AT/PT/RJS/ESP 3.56E+07 11.5 46.2 0.2 99.95Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 707C4QT/WS9.03E+06 11.8 13.2 10.7 99.81In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 12.3 19.7 5.5Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 334C1WS/ESP/PT 4.18E+06 13.0 17.4 8.5 99.55In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 707C3QT/WS1.09E+07 13.0 20.4 9.2 99.83In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS4.45E+06 14.0 18.9 10.3 99.54In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 221C2 PT 14.7 16.7 13.5Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 210C1FF/S1.99E+07 15.7 27.7 5.9 99.89Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 221C1 PT 16.5 19.8 10.9Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.86E+0716.6 24.6 6.5 99.94Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 9.62E+0619.7 35.5 1.4 99.70In: MACT EU (WS)TABLE 3-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS MTECStack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)

# 3-51Tot Cl INC 334C2WS/ESP/PT 9.39E+06 21.7 28.5 17.2 99.66In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS2.37E+06 22.4 26.4 18.4 98.62In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 701C1VS/PT 26.1 27.7 24.5Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 713C1VS/PT 1.22E+05 26.9 28.4 24.5 67.93In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 2.61E+0628.9 51.2 1.0 98.39In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 3.19E+06 29.6 46.4 18.8 98.65In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 714C3 WS 6.38E+06 32.0 38.7 23.6 99.27In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 6.27E+0632.6 34.9 29.2 99.24In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 221C4 PT 34.2 39.7 24.5Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 209C3 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.04E+0735.3 42.0 30.8 99.50In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 211C1 FF/S 2.55E+07 37.7 48.3 27.9 99.78Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 8.71E+06 39.3 101.1 4.0 99.34In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 221C5 PT 39.7 42.9 38.1Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 906C2 QT/PT 4.82E+0644.1 64.4 16.0 98.67In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 806C1C/VS 45.3 47.0 43.6Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 333C1SD/FF8.57E+06 48.6 59.1 33.7 99.17Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 806C2C/VS9.51E+02 52.2 72.7 33.1 -4147.19 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 210C2 FF/S 1.81E+07 54.1 62.8 45.0 99.56Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 2.17E+08 54.4 56.0 52.8 99.96Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM55.8 77.2 31.9Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 333C2SD/FF1.31E+07 59.0 83.0 20.1 99.35Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 332C1 WS 3.84E+07 64.8 86.1 36.3 99.75Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 714C2 WS 7.34E+06 70.3 81.4 63.7 98.61In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 714C1 WS 1.04E+07 70.4 76.3 67.0 99.01In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 725C1WS/QT75.2 95.1 65.1Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 2.58E+08 96.8 108.6 85.1 99.95Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 337C1WHB/DA/DI/FF99.3 111.4 91.4Out: No MTEC, Not MACTTot Cl INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.54E+08 102.0 126.4 78.1 99.90Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 4.04E+07106.5 142.9 78.4 99.62Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 212C1FF/S3.31E+07 133.9 249.6 64.2 99.41Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 906C1 QT/PT 6.22E+07 134.3 143.7 117.3 99.69 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 714C5 WS 1.27E+07 135.6 212.2 94.2 98.44Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/M (714C4)Tot Cl INC 500C2 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.26E+07 139.3 343.2 2.2 98.39 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/M (500C4)TABLE 3-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS MTECStack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)

# 3-52Tot Cl INC 906C3 QT/PT 5.27E+07 159.4 179.6 126.7 99.56 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 229C4 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.86E+08 159.8 271.4 48.2 99.87Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 324C4 ? 163.2 668.6 2.9 Out: No MTEC, Unknown APCSTot Cl INC 704C1 NONE 9.45E+07 163.7 178.1 155.5 99.75 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 725C2WS/QT 164.7 177.6 140.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 906C5 QT/PT 7.94E+07 188.3 205.1 172.0 99.65 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 324C3 ? 192.6 622.8 4.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 324C1 ? 200.9 550.4 7.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 704C2 NONE 1.14E+08 214.3 274.3 167.2 99.73 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 324C2 ? 215.1 560.2 7.8 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.96E+08 218.1 318.4 154.4 99.84 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 914C1 ? 1.77E+07 227.1 273.4 202.3 98.13 Out: Unknown APCSTot Cl INC 906C4 QT/PT 6.57E+07 252.7 344.8 175.5 99.44 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 703C1 WHB 5.41E+05 325.5 376.4 247.8 12.48 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 710C3 QT/OS/C/S 4.52E+07 346.8 353.9 341.5 98.88Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 710C1 QT/OS/C/S 6.52E+07 355.5 381.7 306.3 99.21Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 703C2 WHB 4.87E+05 378.1 445.2 260.7 -13.00 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 710C2 QT/OS/C/S 4.91E+07 439.6 483.1 382.8 98.70Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 784C1 NONE 1012.3 1061.3 963.5 Out: No MTEC, Not MACTTot Cl INC 784C2 NONE 1067.9 1119.8 974.5 Out: No MTEC, Not MACTTABLE 3-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS MTECStack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)

# 3-53TABLE 3-16. TOTAL CHLORINE, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCSMTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl CK 204C2 ESP 1.62E+06 0.1 0.1 0.1 99.99 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 1.6e6)Tot Cl CK 304C2 ESP 0.4 0.6 0.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 30141 FF1.17E+06 0.4 0.6 0.3 99.96 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 1.2e6)Tot Cl CK 403C1 ESP 1.60E+06 0.7 1.6 0.2 99.95 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 1.6e6)Tot Cl CK 30151 FF1.17E+06 0.7 1.0 0.3 99.93 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 403C2 ESP 2.15E+06 0.9 1.1 0.8 99.95 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 315C1 FF 4.74E+05 1.4 1.7 1.1 99.71 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 202C1 FF 3.00E+05 1.7 2.5 1.2 99.77 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 303C1QC/FF0.00E+00 2.0 3.1 1.2 98.99 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 315C2 FF 3.90E+05 2.7 2.8 2.6 99.38 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 317C1 FF 1.24E+05 2.9 3.5 2.2 98.58 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 306C1MC/FF7.39E+05 2.9 3.9 2.3 99.46 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 405C1 ESP 1.64E+06 3.2 4.0 2.6 99.81 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 317C2 FF 2.59E+05 3.7 5.6 2.2 99.11 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 208C1 ESP 4.26E+05 4.5 6.2 2.9 98.96 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 207C1MC/ESP7.36E+05 4.9 5.3 4.5 99.26 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 308C1 ESP 7.79E+05 5.6 6.3 4.4 99.19 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 320C1 FF 3.34E+05 5.9 9.2 3.9 98.08 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 317C3 FF 0.00E+00 7.0 7.8 6.0 94.79 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 321C1 ESP 1.12E+06 9.5 12.0 6.9 99.10In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 302C1 ESP 2.19E+06 10.2 11.0 9.8 99.36Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 401C5 ESP 1.86E+06 10.4 14.9 6.9 99.37Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 205C1 ESP 5.47E+05 16.6 20.2 13.5 96.05In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 200C1 FF 3.24E+06 18.2 24.1 15.3 99.19Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 201C1 FF 3.02E+06 20.1 24.9 16.6 99.04Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 402C1 ESP 2.79E+06 21.6 41.9 6.7 99.05Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 402C4 ESP 2.82E+06 22.0 31.7 14.2 99.07Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 316C2 FF 4.40E+05 22.2 25.0 20.5 96.03In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 322C1 ESP 3.07E+06 22.6 27.5 18.4 98.96Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 319C2 ESP 27.1 29.2 25.6Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 305C3 ESP 4.72E+05 28.4 30.2 25.9 93.10In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 202C2 FF 8.54E+05 31.1 46.6 14.2 97.73In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 300C1 ESP 2.21E+06 33.8 43.7 23.8 97.81Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 316C1 FF 6.95E+05 35.1 36.9 33.5 95.34In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 309C1MC/ESP1.03E+06 35.7 44.1 24.1 95.23In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 303C2QC/FF1.26E+06 36.0 96.8 5.3 96.71In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 401C1 ESP 3.67E+06 36.2 47.4 22.4 98.76Out: MACT (FC), High MTEC

# 3-54TABLE 3-16. TOTAL CHLORINE, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS MTECStack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl CK 319C8 ESP 1.97E+05 42.4 42.4 42.4 84.36In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 319C7 ESP 42.5 53.5 31.4Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 406C1 ESP 8.23E+05 42.8 121.9 4.6 96.41In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 318C2 ESP 50.6 62.5 42.5Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 319C4 ESP 51.1 57.2 39.3Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 318C1 ESP 7.40E+05 51.3 63.9 41.7 91.71In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 404C2 ESP 2.09E+06 56.8 66.5 49.6 96.89Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 309C2MC/ESP1.00E+06 57.0 83.5 31.6 92.27In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 323C1 ESP 3.65E+06 71.9 101.1 31.4 97.19Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 404C1 ESP 1.65E+06 76.6 105.7 20.5 94.75Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 206C1 ESP 9.83E+05 81.2 148.2 15.1 89.09In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 203C1 ESP 1.33E+06 117.2 128.7 96.4 87.29In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 335C1 ESP 6.45E+05 121.9 150.9 102.6 77.97 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 305C1 ESP 1.24E+06 157.2 185.6 105.9 94.79 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 319C6 ESP 8.30E+05 220.8 227.2 214.5 61.27 In: MACT EU (FC)

# 3-55TABLE 3-17. TOTAL CHLORINE, LWAKs, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPAAPCS MTECStack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot ClLWAK307C3FF/VS7.70E+06 13.3 15.3 10.5 99.75Source already in MACT poolTot ClLWAK307C2FF/VS1.39E+07 26.0 33.1 19.9 99.73MACT pool (VS w/ MTEC of 1.4e7)Tot ClLWAK224C1 FF 8.53E+05 28.8 82.9 1.6 95.12Out: MB problemTot ClLWAK307C4FF/VS1.22E+07 30.9 38.3 25.7 99.63Source already in MACT poolTot ClLWAK307C1FF/VS3.31E+06 41.7 95.5 22.2 98.17Source already in MACT poolTot ClLWAK225C1 FF 8.39E+05 641.1 752.8 567.3 -10.55 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 8.4e5)Tot ClLWAK314C1 FF 1.54E+06 853.2 920.7 814.9 33.74 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 1.5e6)Tot ClLWAK310C1 FF 7.66E+05 1199.1 1235.0 1160.0 -68.03 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot ClLWAK312C1 FF 1.91E+06 1241.2 1341.9 1070.8 18.59 Out: MACT (FC), HIgh MTECTot ClLWAK311C1 FF 9.02E+05 1258.4 1352.6 1184.7 -47.23 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot ClLWAK227C1 FF 6.76E+05 1347.1 1522.0 999.9 -71.64 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot ClLWAK313C1 FF 2.10E+06 1509.0 1572.7 1419.9 7.81Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot ClLWAK223C1 FF 2.40E+06 2079.5 2317.4 1755.3 -25.75 Out: MACT (FC), High MTEC

# 3-56 TABLE 3-18. HC (RA), INCINERATORS

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

HC (RA) INC 222C6 0 0 0 HC (RA) INC 325C8 0 0 0 HC (RA) INC 915C2 0 0 0 HC (RA) INC 222C1 0 0 0 HC (RA) INC 222C2 0 1 0 HC (RA) INC 915C1 0 0 0 HC (RA) INC 703C2 0 0 0 HC (RA) INC 703C1 0 0 0 HC (RA) INC 325C6 0 1 0 HC (RA) INC 222C3 1 1 0 HC (RA) INC 325C5 1 1 1 HC (RA) INC 701C3 1 1 1 HC (RA) INC 325C4 1 1 1 HC (RA) INC 325C7 1 2 0 HC (RA) INC 710C2 1 2 1 HC (RA) INC 214C2 1 1 1 HC (RA) INC 214C1 1 1 1 HC (RA) INC 725C1 1 2 0 HC (RA) INC 726C2 1 1 1 HC (RA) INC 915C3 1 2 1 HC (RA) INC 339C1 1 2 1 HC (RA) INC 338C1 1 2 1 HC (RA) INC 340C2 1 2 1 HC (RA) INC 709C1 1 2 1 HC (RA) INC 214C3 2 2 1 HC (RA) INC 906C1 2 3 1 HC (RA) INC 906C2 2 3 0 HC (RA) INC 807C3 2 2 2 HC (RA) INC 344C1 2 3 1 HC (RA) INC 334C1 2 2 2 HC (RA) INC 334C2 2 2 2 HC (RA) INC 906C4 2 2 2 HC (RA) INC 340C1 2 4 0 HC (RA) INC 725C2 2 4 1 HC (RA) INC 338C2 2 2 2 HC (RA) INC 807C1 2 3 2 HC (RA) INC 210C2 3 3 2 HC (RA) INC 329C1 3 4 1 HC (RA) INC 906C3 3 4 1 HC (RA) INC 710C1 3 6 1 HC (RA) INC 211C1 3 4 2 HC (RA) INC 221C4 3 3 3 HC (RA) INC 337C2 3 3 3 HC (RA) INC 221C5 3 4 3 HC (RA) INC 221C3 3 4 3 HC (RA) INC 221C1 4 5 3 HC (RA) INC 327C1 4 5 3 HC (RA) INC 212C1 4 6 3 HC (RA) INC 221C2 4 5 3 HC (RA) INC 809C2 4 5 3 HC (RA) INC 809C1 4 5 4 HC (RA) INC 706C2 5 5 4 HC (RA) INC 327C2 5 5 4 HC (RA) INC 904C2 5 6 5

# 3-57 TABLE 3-18. HC (RA), INCINERATORS

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

HC (RA) INC 807C2 5 12 2 HC (RA) INC 210C1 5 9 2 HC (RA) INC 706C1 5 7 4 HC (RA) INC 902C1 5 8 4 HC (RA) INC 706C3 5 6 5 HC (RA) INC 327C3 7 9 5 HC (RA) INC 805C1 8 14 4 HC (RA) INC 904C1 8 10 6 HC (RA) INC 904C3 9 10 8 HC (RA) INC 806C1 11 12 10 HC (RA) INC 710C3 16 36 1 HC (RA) INC 726C1 22 37 2 HC (RA) INC 727C1 24 58 7 HC (RA) INC 806C2 36 68 19 HC (RA) INC 727C2 299 385 152

# 3-58 TABLE 3-19. HC (MHRA), INCINERATORS

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

HC (MHRA) INC 710C2 2 4 1 HC (MHRA) INC 807C3 2 2 2 HC (MHRA) INC 807C1 2 3 1 HC (MHRA) INC 710C1 5 10 2 HC (MHRA) INC 915C2 16 23 6 HC (MHRA) INC 915C3 17 28 4 HC (MHRA) INC 807C2 17 45 2 HC (MHRA) INC 915C1 21 33 5 HC (MHRA) INC 710C3 43 72 2

# 3-59 TABLE 3-20. CO (RA), INCINERATORS

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

CO (RA) INC 904C2 0 0 0 CO (RA) INC 209C7 0 1 0 CO (RA) INC 209C5 0 1 0 CO (RA) INC 904C3 0 0 0 CO (RA) INC 210C2 0 1 0 CO (RA) INC 904C1 1 1 0 CO (RA) INC 337C2 1 1 0 CO (RA) INC 209C8 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 325C4 1 1 0 CO (RA) INC 915C1 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 349C1 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 358C4 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 350C5 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 350C3 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 350C4 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 703C2 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 350C6 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 350C7 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 714C3 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 703C1 1 2 1 CO (RA) INC 350C8 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 350C9 1 1 1 CO (RA) INC 216C5 1 2 1 CO (RA) INC 341C2 2 3 1 CO (RA) INC 354C4 2 3 1 CO (RA) INC 725C2 2 3 1 CO (RA) INC 338C1 2 3 1 CO (RA) INC 338C2 2 3 2 CO (RA) INC 708C1 2 2 2 CO (RA) INC 358C1 2 3 2 CO (RA) INC 337C1 2 6 0 CO (RA) INC 807C1 2 4 2 CO (RA) INC 784C1 3 3 2 CO (RA) INC 325C6 3 3 2 CO (RA) INC 325C5 3 3 2 CO (RA) INC 705C2 3 6 0 CO (RA) INC 354C2 3 4 1 CO (RA) INC 356C1 3 5 1 CO (RA) INC 354C1 3 3 3 CO (RA) INC 705C1 3 4 2 CO (RA) INC 325C7 3 4 2 CO (RA) INC 914C1 4 6 2 CO (RA) INC 807C3 4 11 0 CO (RA) INC 349C3 4 7 1 CO (RA) INC 708C2 4 6 2 CO (RA) INC 212C1 4 5 2 CO (RA) INC 211C1 4 6 3 CO (RA) INC 327C2 4 6 2 CO (RA) INC 333C2 5 11 1 CO (RA) INC 704C1 5 5 4 CO (RA) INC 784C2 5 5 4 CO (RA) INC 350C2 5 9 2 CO (RA) INC 341C1 5 7 3 CO (RA) INC 906C4 5 5 5

# 3-60 TABLE 3-20. CO (RA), INCINERATORS

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

CO (RA) INC 906C3 5 5 5 CO (RA) INC 709C1 6 7 5 CO (RA) INC 906C2 6 7 5 CO (RA) INC 725C1 6 6 6 CO (RA) INC 354C3 6 15 2 CO (RA) INC 325C3 6 18 1 CO (RA) INC 906C1 7 8 6 CO (RA) INC 214C1 7 11 5 CO (RA) INC 824C1 7 9 5 CO (RA) INC 351C3 8 10 5 CO (RA) INC 348C1 8 8 7 CO (RA) INC 333C1 8 9 7 CO (RA) INC 711C1 8 15 2 CO (RA) INC 351C2 8 11 4 CO (RA) INC 327C1 8 12 7 CO (RA) INC 714C5 9 16 1 CO (RA) INC 221C1 9 11 8 CO (RA) INC 915C4 10 14 6 CO (RA) INC 713C1 10 25 2 CO (RA) INC 334C1 10 17 4 CO (RA) INC 327C3 10 13 4 CO (RA) INC 353C1 10 13 7 CO (RA) INC 329C1 10 14 8 CO (RA) INC 209C4 10 17 4 CO (RA) INC 216C6 10 28 1 CO (RA) INC 222C3 11 12 9 CO (RA) INC 357C1 11 16 6 CO (RA) INC 807C2 12 22 0 CO (RA) INC 340C2 12 13 11 CO (RA) INC 906C5 13 22 8 CO (RA) INC 808C2 13 14 12 CO (RA) INC 344C1 14 15 13 CO (RA) INC 710C1 15 15 14 CO (RA) INC 221C4 15 16 14 CO (RA) INC 711C3 15 21 9 CO (RA) INC 708C3 15 22 4 CO (RA) INC 710C3 16 36 2 CO (RA) INC 810C1 16 24 12 CO (RA) INC 353C2 16 20 10 CO (RA) INC 710C2 17 34 8 CO (RA) INC 349C2 17 29 1 CO (RA) INC 726C2 17 18 16 CO (RA) INC 221C2 18 19 17 CO (RA) INC 221C5 18 18 17 CO (RA) INC 714C2 18 35 8 CO (RA) INC 711C2 18 23 14 CO (RA) INC 214C3 19 21 18 CO (RA) INC 221C3 20 20 20 CO (RA) INC 353C3 20 21 19 CO (RA) INC 344C2 21 26 18 CO (RA) INC 726C1 23 25 20 CO (RA) INC 214C2 24 36 18 CO (RA) INC 810C2 25 37 19 CO (RA) INC 324C3 26 35 20

# 3-61 TABLE 3-20. CO (RA), INCINERATORS

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

CO (RA) INC 346C1 28 35 20 CO (RA) INC 324C4 29 30 25 CO (RA) INC 706C1 31 34 28 CO (RA) INC 222C1 34 38 29 CO (RA) INC 324C1 35 45 28 CO (RA) INC 905C1 35 41 27 CO (RA) INC 222C6 36 46 21 CO (RA) INC 902C1 41 46 38 CO (RA) INC 706C2 42 45 41 CO (RA) INC 324C2 43 60 36 CO (RA) INC 216C7 44 86 20 CO (RA) INC 706C3 45 49 41 CO (RA) INC 714C1 46 66 25 CO (RA) INC 340C1 50 82 22 CO (RA) INC 351C4 52 59 39 CO (RA) INC 351C1 53 97 18 CO (RA) INC 222C2 64 75 52 CO (RA) INC 806C1 68 73 60 CO (RA) INC 359C6 95 191 18 CO (RA) INC 915C2 100 122 69 CO (RA) INC 359C4 104 167 35 CO (RA) INC 359C5 106 129 81 CO (RA) INC 915C3 109 125 97 CO (RA) INC 350C1 140 394 8 CO (RA) INC 334C2 166 280 107 CO (RA) INC 808C1 202 487 29 CO (RA) INC 209C6 226 656 9 CO (RA) INC 727C1 296 341 232 CO (RA) INC 325C1 308 911 5 CO (RA) INC 806C2 320 337 302 CO (RA) INC 805C2 354 459 291 CO (RA) INC 325C2 438 1299 4 CO (RA) INC 805C1 441 831 119 CO (RA) INC 332C1 550 702 362 CO (RA) INC 809C1 1250 1302 1220 CO (RA) INC 809C2 1266 1408 1158 CO (RA) INC 209C3 1499 1666 1228 CO (RA) INC 707A5 1851 2026 1745 CO (RA) INC 707A4 3401 3936 2951 CO (RA) INC 727C2 3718 4428 2605 CO (RA) INC 707A2 3730 4382 3320 CO (RA) INC 707C4 4189 4803 3475 CO (RA) INC 707C3 5788 6073 5638 CO (RA) INC 707A6 6422 6868 5571 CO (RA) INC 707C2 6716 7618 5862 CO (RA) INC 707A3 7545 7767 7268 CO (RA) INC 707C8 9583 10255 8685 CO (RA) INC 707A1 10061 11338 9063 CO (RA) INC 707C7 10330 11206 9426 CO (RA) INC 707C1 10397 11687 9550 CO (RA) INC 707C9 10448 11422 8840

# 3-62 TABLE 3-21. CO (MHRA), INCINERATORS

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

CO (MHRA) INC 709C1 8 8 6 CO (MHRA) INC 325C3 10 22 1 CO (MHRA) INC 341C2 12 16 4 CO (MHRA) INC 351C2 13 17 7 CO (MHRA) INC 351C3 13 18 8 CO (MHRA) INC 915C1 14 18 11 CO (MHRA) INC 807C1 18 46 4 CO (MHRA) INC 710C1 38 70 20 CO (MHRA) INC 807C3 44 127 1 CO (MHRA) INC 710C2 54 129 15 CO (MHRA) INC 351C4 59 66 45 CO (MHRA) INC 341C1 99 100 97 CO (MHRA) INC 807C2 175 331 1 CO (MHRA) INC 351C1 195 334 49 CO (MHRA) INC 710C3 241 634 2 CO (MHRA) INC 915C4 251 735 6 CO (MHRA) INC 325C1 383 1131 6 CO (MHRA) INC 325C2 553 1631 6 CO (MHRA) INC 915C3 1209 2159 540 CO (MHRA) INC 915C2 1644 2628 680

# 3-63 TABLE 3-22. HC (RA), CEMENT KILNS MAIN STACK

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

HC (RA) CK main 206C4 4 4 4 HC (RA) CK main 322C1 7 8 5 HC (RA) CK main 401C5 7 9 5 HC (RA) CK main 401C3 8 10 6 HC (RA) CK main 323C1 8 12 3 HC (RA) CK main 403C1 10 11 7 HC (RA) CK main 404C1 10 15 7 HC (RA) CK main 309C1 11 11 10 HC (RA) CK main 402C4 11 13 10 HC (RA) CK main 228C4 12 12 11 HC (RA) CK main 401C4 12 15 10 HC (RA) CK main 405C1 14 17 12 HC (RA) CK main 404C2 14 15 11 HC (RA) CK main 206C3 14 14 14 HC (RA) CK main 403C2 14 15 13 HC (RA) CK main 206C1 14 14 14 HC (RA) CK main 335C1 15 18 8 HC (RA) CK main 309C2 15 16 14 HC (RA) CK main 206C2 16 16 16 HC (RA) CK main 300C1 16 17 14 HC (RA) CK main 405C2 16 20 14 HC (RA) CK main 228C1 16 21 14 HC (RA) CK main 402C3 17 22 10 HC (RA) CK main 300C2 17 18 16 HC (RA) CK main 205C3 18 18 18 HC (RA) CK main 203C1 19 19 18 HC (RA) CK main 301C1 19 23 15 HC (RA) CK main 205C4 19 19 19 HC (RA) CK main 301C2 21 27 17 HC (RA) CK main 305C3 22 24 21 HC (RA) CK main 205C2 26 26 26 HC (RA) CK main 205C1 26 26 26 HC (RA) CK main 402C2 26 30 23 HC (RA) CK main 402C1 32 36 29 HC (RA) CK main 301C3 35 42 29 HC (RA) CK main 303C2 36 38 33 HC (RA) CK main 401C2 47 49 44 HC (RA) CK main 317C3 54 57 50 HC (RA) CK main 317C1 54 59 46 HC (RA) CK main 317C2 55 56 54 HC (RA) CK main 303C3 60 67 55 HC (RA) CK main 319C2 60 64 58 HC (RA) CK main 319C4 61 71 58 HC (RA) CK main 401C1 67 70 64 HC (RA) CK main 320C1 69 79 61 HC (RA) CK main 319C1 76 77 75 HC (RA) CK main 303C1 87 99 76

# 3-64 TABLE 3-23. HC (MHRA), CEMENT KILNS MAIN STACK

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

HC (MHRA) CK main 318C2 5 5 5 HC (MHRA) CK main 318C1 7 8 5 HC (MHRA) CK main 322C1 7 9 6 HC (MHRA) CK main 318C3 8 11 5 HC (MHRA) CK main 323C1 11 13 9 HC (MHRA) CK main 404C1 13 18 8 HC (MHRA) CK main 309C1 13 14 13 HC (MHRA) CK main 403C1 15 18 12 HC (MHRA) CK main 228C4 16 17 14 HC (MHRA) CK main 309C2 17 18 15 HC (MHRA) CK main 300C1 19 19 19 HC (MHRA) CK main 203C1 19 20 19 HC (MHRA) CK main 300C2 19 20 19 HC (MHRA) CK main 403C2 19 20 19 HC (MHRA) CK main 404C2 20 20 19 HC (MHRA) CK main 405C2 21 25 17 HC (MHRA) CK main 405C1 22 26 17 HC (MHRA) CK main 228C1 22 33 17 HC (MHRA) CK main 402C2 37 46 29 HC (MHRA) CK main 402C1 44 61 32 HC (MHRA) CK main 401C2 52 54 49 HC (MHRA) CK main 401C1 84 95 71 HC (MHRA) CK main 320C1 100 101 98

# 3-65 TABLE 3-24. CO (RA), CEMENT KILNS MAIN STACK

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

CO (RA) CK main 306C1 14 22 8 CO (RA) CK main 207C2 25 28 21 CO (RA) CK main 207C1 26 27 25 CO (RA) CK main 208C1 47 50 45 CO (RA) CK main 208C2 50 57 44 CO (RA) CK main 300C2 98 186 56 CO (RA) CK main 309C1 101 125 53 CO (RA) CK main 206C4 115 115 115 CO (RA) CK main 30153 115 129 105 CO (RA) CK main 205C1 132 132 132 CO (RA) CK main 309C2 136 137 135 CO (RA) CK main 30143 139 184 68 CO (RA) CK main 206C2 153 153 153 CO (RA) CK main 206C1 154 154 154 CO (RA) CK main 335C1 159 194 131 CO (RA) CK main 206C3 163 163 163 CO (RA) CK main 205C4 164 164 164 CO (RA) CK main 205C3 167 167 167 CO (RA) CK main 205C2 175 175 175 CO (RA) CK main 319C5 184 184 184 CO (RA) CK main 319C7 218 229 206 CO (RA) CK main 319C6 240 272 220 CO (RA) CK main 228C4 248 256 240 CO (RA) CK main 403C1 248 312 195 CO (RA) CK main 203C1 278 291 270 CO (RA) CK main 319C1 295 301 292 CO (RA) CK main 317C1 317 340 282 CO (RA) CK main 323C1 327 682 86 CO (RA) CK main 317C2 339 349 333 CO (RA) CK main 319C2 343 364 329 CO (RA) CK main 317C3 349 360 332 CO (RA) CK main 319C4 349 406 331 CO (RA) CK main 322C1 364 547 174 CO (RA) CK main 300C1 379 595 234 CO (RA) CK main 404C2 401 551 255 CO (RA) CK main 403C2 425 515 356 CO (RA) CK main 404C1 459 580 226 CO (RA) CK main 401C4 491 627 396 CO (RA) CK main 401C2 513 597 438 CO (RA) CK main 228C1 515 549 475 CO (RA) CK main 30152 568 671 447 CO (RA) CK main 401C5 612 673 576 CO (RA) CK main 401C3 638 649 628 CO (RA) CK main 30142 643 819 452 CO (RA) CK main 402C3 667 977 422 CO (RA) CK main 405C2 700 851 488 CO (RA) CK main 402C4 722 1051 532 CO (RA) CK main 402C1 882 1098 573 CO (RA) CK main 401C1 923 1203 626 CO (RA) CK main 402C2 946 1238 666 CO (RA) CK main 405C1 1007 1123 905 CO (RA) CK main 30151 1051 1381 564 CO (RA) CK main 303C1 1234 1535 986 CO (RA) CK main 30141 1274 1454 1005

# 3-66 TABLE 3-24. CO (RA), CEMENT KILNS MAIN STACK

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

CO (RA) CK main 320C1 1511 1708 1365 CO (RA) CK main 303C2 2039 2947 1559 CO (RA) CK main 303C3 2699 3136 2258 CO (RA) CK main 305C3 3960 5186 2555

# 3-67 TABLE 3-25. CO (MHRA), CEMENT KILNS MAIN STACK

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

CO (MHRA) CK main 207C2 31 39 23 CO (MHRA) CK main 207C1 34 39 28 CO (MHRA) CK main 306C1 41 64 11 CO (MHRA) CK main 208C1 50 52 48 CO (MHRA) CK main 208C2 54 62 49 CO (MHRA) CK main 309C1 132 140 126 CO (MHRA) CK main 309C2 145 155 138 CO (MHRA) CK main 300C2 170 296 73 CO (MHRA) CK main 318C1 272 297 223 CO (MHRA) CK main 203C1 300 312 276 CO (MHRA) CK main 228C4 380 491 320 CO (MHRA) CK main 403C1 487 629 350 CO (MHRA) CK main 322C1 594 850 276 CO (MHRA) CK main 300C1 623 757 556 CO (MHRA) CK main 404C1 660 824 325 CO (MHRA) CK main 323C1 692 1200 125 CO (MHRA) CK main 404C2 704 796 645 CO (MHRA) CK main 403C2 741 900 596 CO (MHRA) CK main 228C1 773 837 666 CO (MHRA) CK main 401C2 808 932 637 CO (MHRA) CK main 405C2 1075 1262 744 CO (MHRA) CK main 405C1 1191 1412 995 CO (MHRA) CK main 402C2 1582 1894 1371 CO (MHRA) CK main 402C1 1908 3017 1335 CO (MHRA) CK main 401C1 2027 3511 1161 CO (MHRA) CK main 320C1 2070 2121 1966

# 3-68 TABLE 3-26. HC (RA), CEMENT KILNS BYPASS STACK

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

HC (RA) CK bypass 315C2 2 2 2 HC (RA) CK bypass 315C3 2 2 2 HC (RA) CK bypass 315C1 2 2 2 HC (RA) CK bypass 406C2 3 4 2 HC (RA) CK bypass 402C4 4 8 0 HC (RA) CK bypass 316C2 4 5 4 HC (RA) CK bypass 316C1 6 7 5 HC (RA) CK bypass 406C1 6 14 1 HC (RA) CK bypass 402C3 8 10 6 HC (RA) CK bypass 301C2 10 22 4 HC (RA) CK bypass 301C3 24 44 7 HC (RA) CK bypass 301C1 37 59 14

# 3-69 TABLE 3-27. HC (MHRA), CEMENT KILNS BYPASS STACK

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

HC (MHRA) CK bypass 315C2 2 2 2 HC (MHRA) CK bypass 315C1 3 3 2 HC (MHRA) CK bypass 406C2 5 6 3 HC (MHRA) CK bypass 316C2 5 6 4 HC (MHRA) CK bypass 316C1 7 8 6 HC (MHRA) CK bypass 406C1 11 22 3

# 3-70 TABLE 3-28. CO (RA), CEMENT KILNS BYPASS STACK

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

CO (RA) CK bypass 315C2 2 5 1 CO (RA) CK bypass 301C2 14 14 14 CO (RA) CK bypass 321C1 23 25 21 CO (RA) CK bypass 315C3 36 51 17 CO (RA) CK bypass 315C1 37 52 20 CO (RA) CK bypass 316C2 131 183 95 CO (RA) CK bypass 316C1 133 145 119 CO (RA) CK bypass 406C1 230 315 179 CO (RA) CK bypass 301C1 248 380 146 CO (RA) CK bypass 406C2 286 325 246 CO (RA) CK bypass 402C3 427 475 365 CO (RA) CK bypass 402C4 602 718 487

# 3-71 TABLE 3-29. CO (MHRA), CEMENT KILNS BYPASS STACK

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

CO (MHRA) CK bypass 315C2 6 11 3 CO (MHRA) CK bypass 321C1 39 61 31 CO (MHRA) CK bypass 315C1 50 84 23 CO (MHRA) CK bypass 316C2 283 323 261 CO (MHRA) CK bypass 316C1 293 308 281 CO (MHRA) CK bypass 406C1 522 756 350 CO (MHRA) CK bypass 406C2 568 655 432

# 3-72 TABLE 3-30. HC (RA), LWAKs

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

HC (RA) LWAK 313C1 3 4 2 HC (RA) LWAK 310C1 3 5 2 HC (RA) LWAK 314C1 4 5 3 HC (RA) LWAK 311C1 5 5 5 HC (RA) LWAK 312C1 5 5 5 HC (RA) LWAK 227C1 9 11 8

# 3-73 TABLE 3-31. HC (MHRA), LWAKs

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

HC (MHRA) LWAK 400C1 3 8 1 HC (MHRA) LWAK 310C1 4 6 2 HC (MHRA) LWAK 313C1 5 6 4 HC (MHRA) LWAK 314C1 5 6 4 HC (MHRA) LWAK 312C1 5 6 5 HC (MHRA) LWAK 311C1 5 6 5 HC (MHRA) LWAK 227C1 13 13 12

# 3-74 TABLE 3-32. CO (RA), LWAKs

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

CO (RA) LWAK 314C1 3 4 2 CO (RA) LWAK 224C1 7 7 7 CO (RA) LWAK 223C1 9 10 9 CO (RA) LWAK 306C1 14 22 8 CO (RA) LWAK 225C1 14 28 7 CO (RA) LWAK 313C1 15 22 7 CO (RA) LWAK 226C1 16 22 11 CO (RA) LWAK 307C3 41 46 37 CO (RA) LWAK 307C1 46 51 40 CO (RA) LWAK 307C2 47 51 43 CO (RA) LWAK 307C4 49 51 48 CO (RA) LWAK 312C1 60 70 51 CO (RA) LWAK 311C1 60 70 51 CO (RA) LWAK 310C1 88 128 61 CO (RA) LWAK 227C1 786 1048 484

# 3-75a TABLE 3-33. CO (MHRA), LWAKs

Substance Syst EPA Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) Type Cond ID Avg Max Min

CO (MHRA) LWAK 314C1 4 5 2 CO (MHRA) LWAK 224C1 7 8 7 CO (MHRA) LWAK 223C1 9 10 9 CO (MHRA) LWAK 400C1 10 16 4 CO (MHRA) LWAK 226C1 22 33 12 CO (MHRA) LWAK 225C1 24 56 8 CO (MHRA) LWAK 313C1 27 47 16 CO (MHRA) LWAK 306C1 41 64 11 CO (MHRA) LWAK 312C1 71 92 54 CO (MHRA) LWAK 311C1 71 92 54 CO (MHRA) LWAK 310C1 116 194 68 CO (MHRA) LWAK 227C1 1289 1904 628

# 3-75bTABLE 3-34. SUMMARY OF 6% MACT FLOORS FOR EXISTING SOURCES(BASED ON STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF MACT EU)HAP Units Incinerators Cement KilnsLWA KilnsStnd Design StndDesignStnd DesignPCDD/PCDF TEQ ng/dscm 40 20 8 4.7 8 4.7Mercuryμg/dscm 130 57 130 81 72 36Semi Volatile Metalsμg/dscm 270 120 57 34 12 8Low Volatile Metalsμg/dscm 210 110 130 67 340 230Particulate Mattergr/dscf0.107 0.038 0.065 0.032 0.05 0.024Total Chlorine ppmv 280 96 630 2702100 1400CO ppmv 120 52 n/a n/a 270 120HC ppmv 12 6.1 m : 20* m : 10 14 6.5b : 6.7 b : 5.1or CO 100 or CO 100m : cement kiln main stackb : cement kiln bypass stack* : Based on current RCRA standard

# 3-76DDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDIIIIIIIIIII III II IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII       

347C2, C/QC/VS/S/DM, 163 °F, OR=2% 347C1, C/QC/VS/S/DM, 163 °F, OR=4% 902C1, QT/VS/PT, °F, OR=6% 354C2, QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS, °F, OR=8% 706C3, QT/HS/C, °F, OR=10% 502C1, WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES, °F, OR=12% 347C3, C/QC/VS/S/DM, 164 °F, OR=14% 706C2, QT/HS/C, °F, OR=16% 500C1, QC/VS/KOV/DM, 192 °F, OR=18% 222C7, WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS, 383 °F, OR=20% 347C4, C/QC/VS/S/DM, 161 °F, OR=22% 500C3, QC/VS/KOV/DM, 191 °F, OR=24% 331C1, PT/IWS, °F, OR=25% 222C5, WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS, 383 °F, OR=27% 222C6, WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS, 359 °F, OR=29% 214C1, IWS, 105 °F, OR=31% 221C4, SS/PT/VS, °F, OR=33% 346C1, C/QC/VS/PT/DM, 178 °F, OR=35% 808C1, QT/PBS/ESP, °F, OR=37% 1001C1, ?, °F, OR=39% 725C1, WS/QT, °F, OR=41% 353C2, QC/VS/DM/ESP, °F, OR=43% 221C2, SS/PT/VS, °F, OR=45% 222C4, WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS, 381 °F, OR=47% 915C2, QC/VS/C, °F, OR=49% 807C3, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, °F, OR=51% 221C1, SS/PT/VS, °F, OR=53% 807C2, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, °F, OR=55% 807C1, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, °F, OR=57% 221C3, SS/PT/VS, °F, OR=59% 915C3, QC/VS/C, °F, OR=61% 334C1, WS/ESP/PT, °F, OR=63% 327C4, SD/FF/WS/ESP, 400 °F, OR=65% 221C5, SS/PT/VS, °F, OR=67% 222C2, WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS, 384 °F, OR=69% 222C3, WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS, 379 °F, OR=76% 334C2, WS/ESP/PT, °F, OR=82% 222C1, WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS, 411 °F, OR=84% 914C1, ?, °F, OR=86% 229C1, WHB/ACS/HCS/CS, 500 °F, OR=88% 229C2, WHB/ACS/HCS/CS, 500 °F, OR=90% 330C1, QT/WS/DM, °F, OR=98% 330C2, QT/WS/DM, °F, OR=100%00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91

PCDD/PCDF TEQ (ng/dscm @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-1. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, incinerators, MACT pool and expanded universe, existing sources, 6% MACT floor analysis.

# 3-77DD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIII    

208C1, ESP, 409 °F, OR=2% 207C1, MC/ESP, 418 °F, OR=4% 315C2, FF, 403 °F, OR=6% 336C2, FF, 400 °F, OR=8% 401C4, ESP, 296 °F, OR=9% 315C1, FF, 341 °F, OR=11% 402C3, ESP, 276 °F, OR=13% 336C1, FF, 400 °F, OR=15% 401C3, ESP, 379 °F, OR=17% 401C5, ESP, 365 °F, OR=21% 322C53, ESP, 374 °F, OR=23% 323C50, ESP, 360 °F, OR=28% 228C4, ESP, 381 °F, OR=32% 402C4, ESP, 350 °F, OR=36% 405C1, ESP, 256 °F, OR=40% 322C52, ESP, 415 °F, OR=47% 406C1, ESP, 352 °F, OR=51% 335C50, ESP, 400 °F, OR=55% 323C51, ESP, 400 °F, OR=58% 203C1, ESP, 383 °F, OR=83%00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91

PCDD/PCDF TEQ (ng/dscm @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-2. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, industrial kilns, MACT pool and expanded universe, existing sources, 6% MACT floor analysis.

# 3-78DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDII IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII II II II IIIIIIIIII II IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII            

222C6, OR=1% 915C2, OR=3% 222C1, OR=4% 222C2, OR=6% 915C1, OR=7% 703C2, OR=9% 703C1, OR=10% 325C6, OR=12% 222C3, OR=13% 325C5, OR=15% 701C3, OR=16% 325C4, OR=18% 325C7, OR=19% 710C2, OR=21% 214C2, OR=22% 214C1, OR=24% 725C1, OR=25% 726C2, OR=26% 915C3, OR=28% 339C1, OR=29% 338C1, OR=31% 340C2, OR=32% 709C1, OR=34% 214C3, OR=35% 906C1, OR=37% 906C2, OR=38% 807C3, OR=40% 344C1, OR=41% 334C1, OR=43% 334C2, OR=44% 906C4, OR=46% 340C1, OR=47% 725C2, OR=49% 338C2, OR=50% 807C1, OR=51% 210C2, OR=53% 329C1, OR=54% 906C3, OR=56% 710C1, OR=57% 211C1, OR=59% 221C4, OR=60% 337C2, OR=62% 221C5, OR=63% 221C3, OR=65% 221C1, OR=66% 327C1, OR=68% 212C1, OR=69% 221C2, OR=71% 809C2, OR=72% 809C1, OR=74% 706C2, OR=75% 327C2, OR=76% 904C2, OR=78% 807C2, OR=79% 210C1, OR=81% 706C1, OR=82% 902C1, OR=84% 706C3, OR=85% 327C3, OR=87% 805C1, OR=88% 904C1, OR=90% 904C3, OR=91% 806C1, OR=93% 710C3, OR=94% 726C1, OR=96% 727C1, OR=97% 806C2, OR=99% 727C2, OR=100%051015202530

HC (Run Average) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-3. HC (run average), incinerators, entire universe.

# 3-79DDDDDDIIIIII

710C2, OR=17% 710C1, OR=33% 915C2, OR=50% 915C3, OR=67% 915C1, OR=83% 710C3, OR=100%0510152025303540

HC (MHRA) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-4. HC (maximum hourly rolling average), incinerators, entire universe.

# 3-80DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII   

904C2, OR=1% 209C7, OR=1% 209C5, OR=2% 904C3, OR=3% 210C2, OR=3% 904C1, OR=4% 337C2, OR=4% 209C8, OR=5% 325C4, OR=6% 915C1, OR=6% 349C1, OR=7% 358C4, OR=8% 350C5, OR=8% 350C3, OR=9% 350C4, OR=9% 703C2, OR=10% 350C6, OR=11% 350C7, OR=11% 714C3, OR=12% 703C1, OR=13% 350C8, OR=13% 350C9, OR=14% 216C5, OR=14% 341C2, OR=15% 354C4, OR=16% 725C2, OR=16% 338C1, OR=17% 338C2, OR=18% 708C1, OR=18% 358C1, OR=19% 337C1, OR=19% 807C1, OR=20% 784C1, OR=21% 325C6, OR=21% 325C5, OR=22% 705C2, OR=23% 354C2, OR=23% 356C1, OR=24% 354C1, OR=25% 705C1, OR=25% 325C7, OR=26% 914C1, OR=26% 807C3, OR=27% 349C3, OR=28% 708C2, OR=28% 212C1, OR=29% 211C1, OR=30% 327C2, OR=30% 333C2, OR=31% 704C1, OR=31% 784C2, OR=32% 350C2, OR=33% 341C1, OR=33% 906C4, OR=34% 906C3, OR=35% 709C1, OR=35% 906C2, OR=36% 725C1, OR=36% 354C3, OR=37% 325C3, OR=38% 906C1, OR=38% 214C1, OR=39% 824C1, OR=40% 351C3, OR=40% 348C1, OR=41% 333C1, OR=42% 711C1, OR=42% 351C2, OR=43% 327C1, OR=43% 714C5, OR=44% 221C1, OR=45% 915C4, OR=45% 713C1, OR=46% 334C1, OR=47% 327C3, OR=47% 353C1, OR=48% 329C1, OR=48% 209C4, OR=49%050100150200250300350400450500

CO (Run Average) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-5. CO (run average), incinerators, entire universe (1 of 2).

# 3-81DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 

216C6, OR=50% 222C3, OR=50% 357C1, OR=51% 807C2, OR=52% 340C2, OR=52% 906C5, OR=53% 808C2, OR=53% 344C1, OR=54% 710C1, OR=55% 221C4, OR=55% 711C3, OR=56% 708C3, OR=57% 710C3, OR=57% 810C1, OR=58% 353C2, OR=58% 710C2, OR=59% 349C2, OR=60% 726C2, OR=60% 221C2, OR=61% 221C5, OR=62% 714C2, OR=62% 711C2, OR=63% 214C3, OR=64% 221C3, OR=64% 353C3, OR=65% 344C2, OR=65% 726C1, OR=66% 214C2, OR=67% 810C2, OR=67% 324C3, OR=68% 346C1, OR=69% 324C4, OR=69% 706C1, OR=70% 222C1, OR=70% 324C1, OR=71% 905C1, OR=72% 222C6, OR=72% 902C1, OR=73% 706C2, OR=74% 324C2, OR=74% 216C7, OR=75% 706C3, OR=75% 714C1, OR=76% 340C1, OR=77% 351C4, OR=77% 351C1, OR=78% 222C2, OR=79% 806C1, OR=79% 359C6, OR=80% 915C2, OR=81% 359C4, OR=81% 359C5, OR=82% 915C3, OR=82% 350C1, OR=83% 334C2, OR=84% 808C1, OR=84% 209C6, OR=85% 727C1, OR=86% 325C1, OR=86% 806C2, OR=87% 805C2, OR=87% 325C2, OR=88% 805C1, OR=89% 332C1, OR=89% 809C1, OR=90% 809C2, OR=91% 209C3, OR=91% 707A5, OR=92% 707A4, OR=92% 727C2, OR=93% 707A2, OR=94% 707C4, OR=94% 707C3, OR=95% 707A6, OR=96% 707C2, OR=96% 707A3, OR=97% 707C8, OR=97% 707A1, OR=98% 707C7, OR=99% 707C1, OR=99% 707C9, OR=100%050100150200250300350400450500

CO (Run Average) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-5. CO (run average), incinerators, entire universe (2 of 2).

# 3-82IIIIIIIIIIIIDDDDDDDDDDDD

315C2 315C3 315C1 406C2 402C4 316C2 316C1 406C1 402C3 301C2 301C3 301C10102030405060

HC (Run Average) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-6. HC (run average), cement kiln bypass, entire universe.

# 3-83IIIIIIDDDDDD

315C2 315C1 406C2 316C2 316C1 406C10510152025

HC (MHRA) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-7. HC (maximum hourly rolling average), cement kiln bypass, entire universe.

# 3-84IIIIIIIIIIDDDDDDDDDD

315C2 301C2 321C1 315C3 315C1 316C2 316C1 406C1 301C1 406C2 402C3 402C4050100150200250300

CO (Run Average) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-8. CO (run average), cement kiln bypass, entire universe.

# 3-85IIIIIIIDDDDDDD

315C2 321C1 315C1 316C2 316C1 406C1 406C20100200300400500600700800

CO (MHRA) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-9. CO (maximum hourly rolling average), cement kiln bypass, entire universe.

# 3-86    IIII IIDDDD DD

313C1, OR=20% 310C1, OR=40% 314C1, OR=60% 311C1, OR=80% 312C1, OR=80% 227C1, OR=100%024681012

HC (Run Average) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-10. HC (run average), LWAKs, entire universe.

# 3-87  IIIII IIDDDDD DD

400C1, OR=17% 310C1, OR=33% 313C1, OR=50% 314C1, OR=67% 311C1, OR=83% 312C1, OR=83% 227C1, OR=100%02468101214

HC (MHRA) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-11. HC (maximum hourly rolling average), LWAKs, entire universe.

# 3-88   IIIIIIIIIIII IIDDDDDDDDDDDD DD

314C1, OR=7% 224C1, OR=14% 223C1, OR=21% 225C1, OR=28% 313C1, OR=36% 226C1, OR=43% 306C1, OR=50% 307C3, OR=57% 307C1, OR=64% 307C2, OR=71% 307C4, OR=78% 312C1, OR=86% 311C1, OR=86% 310C1, OR=93% 227C1, OR=100%020406080100120140160180200

CO (Run Average) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-12. CO (run average), LWAKs, entire universe.

# 3-89   IIIIIIIII IIDDDDDDDDD DD

314C1, OR=8% 224C1, OR=17% 223C1, OR=25% 400C1, OR=33% 226C1, OR=42% 225C1, OR=50% 313C1, OR=58% 306C1, OR=67% 312C1, OR=75% 311C1, OR=75% 310C1, OR=92% 227C1, OR=100%020406080100120140160180200

CO (MHRA) (ppmv @ 7% O 2 )Figure 3-13. CO (maximum hourly rolling average), LWAKs, entire universe.

# SECTION 4

NEW SOURCE FLOOR DETERMINATIONS

MACT floor levels for new sources are discussed for each HAP (or HAP surrogate) and source category combination. Similar to that discussed in Section 3 for existing sources, for each combination, the following is presented:

• Summary tables of all test condition stack gas emissions data from the HWC database presented in the accompanying Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards,

Volume II: HWC Emissions Data Base

.

• Identification of the best performing MACT pool source, its emissions level, the definition of MACT based on this best performing source, and discussion of “equivalent technologies” used to expanded the definition MACT if appropriate.

• Identification of the MACT expanded universe (EU) facilities based on the definition of MACT. The range of emissions levels in the EU. A discussion of the reasons that

conditions were not included in the EU.

• The new source MACT design and standard level based on the statistical analysis of the MACT EU population of source test conditions.

A discussion of the HAP control techniques used by the existing sources and the range of emission levels for the entire source category is discussed in detail in Section 3, and is not repeated here.

Similar to that used in Section 3 for determining MACT floors for existing sources, the summary ranking tables for each of the HAP and source category combinations are used to define the MACT best performing source, determine the expanded universe, and screen out conditions. As with those presented in Section 3, the tables contain the following columns of information for each test condition (row entry) from left to right across the table:

• “Subst” -- Defines the HAP of interest (“PM” stands for particulate matter, “TEQ” stands for PCDD/PCDF TEQ, “SVM” for semi-volatile metals, “LVM” for low volatility metals, “TOT CL” for total chlorine, “CO” for carbon monoxide, and “HC” for hydrocarbons).

• “Syst Type” -- Defines the source category type (“INC” for incinerators, “CK” for cement kilns, and “LWAK” for light weight aggregate kilns).

4-1

# • “EPA Cond ID” -- Defines the test condition identification number corresponding to the ID number used in the EPA HWC database. The first three digits identify the combustion source emitting point (each emitting source must have its own stack), followed by the test condition ID number (e.g., “C2” stands for test condition number 2). The test condition ID is required since some facility emitting points have a number of different test conditions for the same HAP. Facility name and location are given for the combustion source emitting point three digit ID number in Appendix E.

• “APCS” -- Identifies the devices used in the air pollution control system. An acronyms list for the various devices is provided in Appendix D and in accompanying Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume II: HWC Emissions Data Base

.

• For PCDD/PCDF only, “APCS Class” -- Identifies the type of air pollution control system used. A “w” stands for wet, “d” for dry, or w/d” for wet/dry. The type depends on if the flue gas is saturated prior to the primary PM control device.

• For PCDD/PCDF only, “PM APCD Temp” -- This identifies the flue gas temperature at the primary PM APCD. It is used for PCDD/PCDF to define MACT.

• For total chlorine, and metals (SVM, LVM, and mercury), “MTEC” -- MTEC is used to

define MACT and determine the MACT EU. The MTECs shown consider that contributed by hazardous waste only, and do not include that from the raw materials or supplemental fuels. MTECs are used in the MACT process; the calculation of MTEC is described in

detail in Section 3 of this volume.

• “Stack Gas Conc” -- Stack gas emissions concentrations of the HAP of interest for the test condition. Average (“Avg”) of all the individual runs (usually three) in test condition, as well as the maximum (“Max”) and minimum (“Min”) of the individual run levels are provided. Note that the test conditions are ranked, lowest to highest, by condition average.

• “Comments” -- Identifies for each test condition the following:

- “MACT source” -- Used if the condition is one of the best-performing MACT source, and is used to define MACT. The HAP control method used by the condition follows in the parenthesis.

- “Already MACT source” -- Used if a condition of the same facility has already been included in the MACT pool.

- “In” -- Used if the condition is considered as part of MACT expanded universe. The reason is included in the parenthesis.

- “Out” -- Used if the condition is not considered as part of the MACT EU. Reasons are given following. For example, “Not MACT” signifies that the condition does not use MACT technology; “Poor MB” signifies that the condition has a poor mass

4-2

# balance; “HW not burned” signifies that this is a baseline condition where hazardous wastes are not burned; “DL measurement” is used when the measurement level of the stack gas is at the analytical detection limit.

4.1 PCDD/PCDF TEQ

4.1.1 Incinerators

Table 4-1 summarizes all PCDD/PCDF TEQ test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The analysis is identical to that for existing sources discussed in Section 3 (exact same MACT pool sources, MACT expanded universe, and floor design and standard
levels).

4.1.2 Cement Kilns

Table 4-2 summarizes all PCDD/PCDF TEQ test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The analysis is similar to that discussed in Section 3 for existing sources. The only difference is that MACT is defined by an primary PM APCD operating temperature of 409 ° F as opposed to 418 ° F that is used for existing sources with the 6% floor procedure. This changes the MACT expanded universe slightly, and has no significant effect on the floor design or standard levels in comparison with the 6% analysis.

4.1.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

The analysis is identical, as discussed in Section 3 for existing sources, to cement kilns

above.

4.2 PARTICULATE MATTER

4.2.1 Incinerators

Table 4-3 summarizes all particulate matter (PM) test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The best performing source (337C1) has an average emissions level of less than 0.001 gr/dscf. MACT is defined by the use of a FF with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than 3.8

acfm/ft 2



# .

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 0.014 gr/dscf. Statistical analysis of the MACT EU provides a floor design level of 0.017 gr/dscf, with a corresponding standard level of 0.039 gr/dscf. Over 50% of all existing source conditions meet this design level.

4.2.2 Cement Kilns

Table 4-4 summarizes all PM test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The best performing MACT source (source 315C2) has an average emissions level below 0.001

4-3

# gr/dscf. MACT is defined as the use of a FF with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than 1.8 acfm/ft 2



# . The MACT EU contains all FF conditions with an air-to-cloth ratio less than 1.8 acfm/ft 2 

# . The MACT EU contains conditions with average levels up to 0.05. Statistical analysis of the EU provides a MACT design level of 0.032 and a MACT standard of 0.065.

However, for similar reasons discussed above for existing CKs, a new source PM MACT floor of 0.03 gr/dscf is proposed, which is identical to that for existing sources. This is based on the PM New Source Performance Standards for cement manufacturing plants (non-hazardous waste burning kilns) (CFR 60.62).

4.2.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

Table 4-5 summarizes all PM test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The best performing MACT source (source 225C1) has an average emissions level of less than 0.001 gr/dscf. MACT is defined as the use of a FF with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than

1.5 acfm/ft 2 

# . The MACT EU contains conditions with average levels up to 0.02 gr/dscf. Statistical analysis of the EU provides a MACT design level of 0.025 gr/dscf and a corresponding MACT standard of 0.054 gr/dscf.

4.3 MERCURY

4.3.1 Incinerators

Table 4-6 summarizes all mercury test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The best performing source (221C5) has a condition average emissions level of 0.1

μ g/dscm. The source uses a combination of mercury feedrate control and wet scrubbing for mercury control. MACT is defined as feedrate control with an MTEC less than 51 μ g/dscm and the use of a wet scrubber (any type of wet type scrubber). Note that this definition is identical to that discussed for existing sources in Section 3, except without a feedrate-only control option.

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 48 μ g/dscm (source 902C1) (exactly the same as the existing source EU). This source uses a wet scrubber, but unlike the MACT source condition, the wet scrubber did not achieve any mercury control. Conditions not making it into the EU either do not use wet scrubbing and/or have MTECs higher than the MACT limit or have mass balance problems (stack emissions significantly higher than the feedrate MTEC measurements, such as 327C2, indicating that the reported MTEC is in question).

The new source MACT floor design level is determined to be 58 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 130 μ g/dscm. Over 80% of the conditions in the entire HWI universe currently meet this design level using feedrate with or without mercury emissions control devices (wet scrubbers).

4.3.2 Cement Kilns

Table 4-7 summarizes all mercury test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition

4-4

# average. As discussed in Section 3, due to the variability of system removal performance and expected volatility of mercury, MACT for mercury control in CKs is defined as feedrate control only. The best performing MACT source (source 404C1) has an average emissions levels of 4

μ g/dscm. MACT is defined as feedrate control with a hazardous waste MTEC less than 28

μ g/dscm. This is lower than the MACT limit for existing sources (MTEC limit of 110 μ g/dscm).

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 56 μ g/dscm (source 208C2). Conditions not making it into the EU have hazardous waste MTECs that are higher than the MACT limit, have mass balance problems (stack emissions significantly higher than the feedrate MTEC measurements, such as 305C3, indicating that the reported MTEC is in question), or are not operating with hazardous waste during the testing period.

The floor design level is determined to be 58 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level

of 82 μ g/dscm. Over 75% of conditions in the entire CK universe currently meet this design level.

4.3.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

Table 4-8 summarizes all mercury test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. Similar to CKs discussed above, the best performing source utilizes feedrate control (313C1) and has a condition average emission of 0.4 μ g/dscm. MACT is defined based on a

feedrate control MTEC level of 17 μ g/dscm; this is exactly the same as existing sources discussed

in Section 4.

The MACT EU contains all conditions with feedrate MTECs less than the MACT defining

level of 17 μ g/dscm. The highest condition average in the EU is at 32 μ g/dscm (source 223C1). The MACT floor design is determined to be 36 μ g/dscm, while the associated MACT standard is

72 μ g/dscm. All sources except source 307 can meet this design level. Note that this source used relatively high levels of mercury spiking during its trial burn tests.

4.4 SEMI VOLATILE METALS

4.4.1 Incinerators

Table 4-9 summarizes all SVM test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The best performing MACT source (source 354C1) has an average emissions level of 3

μ g/dscm. This source uses a VS and IWS with an MTEC of 4.9x10 4 

# μ g/dscm. A FF/WS combination APCS is considered as equivalent technology to the VS/IWS train.

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 94 μ g/dscm. The floor design level is determined to be 120 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 240

μ g/dscm. About 65% of conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level, even though many of these facilities do not use MACT.

4.4.2 Cement Kilns

4-5

# Table 4-10 summarizes all SVM test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The best performing MACT source (320C1) has an average emission level of 4 μ g/dscm.

MACT is defined as a FF with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than 2.1 acfm/ft 2 

# and an MTEC of less

than 3.6x10 4 

# μ g/dscm.

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 33 μ g/dscm (source 303C3). Conditions not making it into the EU either do not use FFs, or use FFs with hazardous waste MTECs that are higher than the MACT limit or air-to-cloth ratios higher than 2.1. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 34 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of

54 μ g/dscm. About 35% of the conditions in the entire universe currently meet this design level.

4.4.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

Table 4-11 summarizes all SVM test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The best performing MACT source (source 225C1) has an average emissions level of 1

μ g/dscm. MACT is defined as the use of an FF with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than 1.5 acfm/ft 2



# and an MTEC of less than 2.7x10 5 

# μ g/dscm.

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 4 μ g/dscm. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 4 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 5.2

μ g/dscm. Less than 50% of the conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level.

4.5 LOW VOLATILE METALS

4.5.1 Incinerators

Table 4-12 summarizes all LVM test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The best performing MACT source (source 500C1) has an average emissions level of 4

μ g/dscm. MACT is defined as the use of a VS with an MTEC of 1x10 3 

# μ g/dscm. Any PM control device is considered as equivalent technology (those including IWS, ESP, or FF). Note that in general, VSs are not the best performers for LVM control, compared with more efficient IWS, ESP, and FFs. However, possibly due to low feedrate MTEC, a facility with a VS has the lowest stack gas emissions concentration, but not necessarily the highest level of LVM control (considering the difference between the inlet flue gas and outlet stack gas concentration across the LVM APCD).

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 145 μ g/dscm (source 221C4). The floor design level is determined to be 110 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard

level of 260 μ g/dscm. About 70% of the conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level, even though many of these facilities do not use the MACT floor defining

control schemes.

4.5.2 Cement Kilns

4-6

# Table 4-13 summarizes all LVM test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The best performing MACT source (source 320C1) has an average emissions level of

less than 4 μ g/dscm. MACT is defined by the use of a FF with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than 2.3

acfm/ft 2 

# and a MTEC of less than 2.5x10 4 

# μ g/dscm.

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages of up to 25 μ g/dscm (303C1). The floor design level is determined to be 26 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard

level of 44 μ g/dscm. Over 50% of the test conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level.

4.5.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

Table 4-14 summarizes all LVM test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The best performing MACT source (source 224C1) has an average emissions level of 10

μ g/dscm. MACT is defined as a FF with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than 1.3 acfm/ft 2 

# and an

MTEC of less than 3.7x10 4 

# μ g/dscm.

The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 41 μ g/dscm. The floor design level is determined to be 36 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 55 μ g/dscm. About 25% of the conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level.

4.6 TOTAL CHLORINE (HCl + Cl 2 

# )

4.6.1 Incinerators

Table 4-15 summarizes all total chlorine test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The best performing source (358C2) has a condition average emissions level of 0.2 ppmv. MACT is defined based on a feedrate control MTEC level is 1.7x10 7 

# μ g/dscm with wet scrubbing (based on source 706C3); note that this is identical to that for existing sources.

The MACT EU contains all conditions with feedrate MTEC less than the MACT defining

level of 1.7x10 7 

# μ g/dscm in conjunction with wet scrubbing. The highest condition average in the expanded universe is at 70 ppmv. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 96 ppmv, while the associated MACT standard is 280 ppmv. About 90% of all test conditions in the entire source category universe meet this design level. Facilities not included in the EU include those not using wet scrubbing, as well as those using wet scrubbing with MTECs above the MACT defining

level.

4.6.2 Cement Kilns

Table 4-16 summarizes all total chlorine test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The best performing MACT source (source 204C2) has a condition average emission level of 0.1 ppmv. MACT is defined based on chlorine feedrate control with a chlorine MTEC of

1.6x10 6 

# μ g/dscm. Note that this is the same as MACT for existing sources.

4-7

# The MACT EU contains all conditions with feedrate MTEC less than the MACT defining

level of 1.6x10 6 

# μ g/dscm. The highest condition average in the EU is at 220 ppmv, which is also the highest emitting source in the entire source category. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 270 ppmv, while the associated MACT standard is 630 ppmv. All test conditions meet this design level. Facilities not included in the EU include those with MTECs above the MACT defining level.

4.6.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

Table 4-17 summarizes all total chlorine test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The best performing source (307C3) uses a combination of feedrate control and a wet venturi scrubber. It has a condition average emissions level of 13 ppmv. MACT is defined as the use of wet scrubbing with a feedrate control MTEC of 1.4x10 7 

# (based on source 307C2). There are no other facilities in the universe that use wet scrubbing beyond the MACT source. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 36 ppmv, while the associated MACT standard is 62

ppmv.

4.7 TRACE ORGANICS SURROGATES

The MACT floor level for new sources for trace organics surrogates CO and HC are identical to that discussed for existing sources in Section 3. This is since, as discussed in Section 3, is not possible to quantitatively define the combustor characteristics that define MACT for CO and THC, and the resulting MACT EU, without a detailed evaluation of each facility source test

condition.

4.8 SUMMARY OF NEW SOURCE FLOOR LEVELS

The statistically derived MACT floor design and standard levels for new sources are summarized in Table 4-18. Note that these levels have not been selected in all cases as being representative of the MACT floor. See the preamble of this rule for a discussion of the proposed

MACT floor levels.

4-8Page 1TABLE 4-1. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS APCS PM APCD Stack Gas Conc (ng/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID Class Temp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM w 163 0.00 0.00 0.00 MACT source (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM w 163 0.01 0.01 0.00 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT w 0.01 0.01 0.01 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS w 0.01 0.02 0.01 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 706C3 QT/HS/C w 0.01 0.01 0.01 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C8 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 0.02 0.02 0.01 In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES w 0.02 0.02 0.01 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C9 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 0.02 0.06 0.01 In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM w 164 0.03 0.03 0.02 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 706C2 QT/HS/C w 0.03 0.03 0.02 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM w 192 0.03 0.03 0.03 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C7 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 383 0.03 0.04 0.02 In: MACT EU (dry w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM w 161 0.04 0.04 0.04 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM w 191 0.04 0.05 0.04 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 331C1 PT/IWS w 0.06 0.11 0.02 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C5 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 383 0.07 0.10 0.04 In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 359 0.07 0.08 0.06 In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 214C1 IWS w 105 0.10 0.19 0.04 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS w 0.10 0.10 0.10 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM w 178 0.13 0.14 0.11 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 808C1 QT/PBS/ESP w 0.15 0.18 0.13 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 1001C1 ? ? 0.16 0.28 0.07 Out: Unknown APCSD/F TEQ INC 725C1 WS/QT w 0.17 0.25 0.06 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP w 0.17 0.27 0.12 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS w 0.20 0.20 0.20 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C4 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 381 0.22 0.45 0.15 In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 915C2 QC/VS/C w 0.24 0.32 0.18 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM w 0.25 0.35 0.19 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS w 0.39 0.39 0.39 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM w 0.40 0.60 0.16 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM w 0.56 0.99 0.28 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS w 0.63 0.63 0.63 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 915C3 QC/VS/C w 0.68 0.84 0.57 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT w 0.69 1.23 0.34 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)Page 2TABLE 4-1. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS APCS PM APCD Stack Gas Conc (ng/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID Class Temp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ INC 327C4 SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 400 0.76 0.95 0.57 In: MACT EU (dry APCS < 400°F)D/F TEQ INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS w 0.78 0.78 0.78 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 384 1.21 1.70 0.82 In: MACT EU (dry APCS < 400°F)D/F TEQ INC 327C5 SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 460 1.31 2.00 0.90 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 325C9 SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 430 2.02 2.30 1.75 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 325A2 SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 460 2.13 2.20 2.00 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 379 2.22 2.62 1.50 In: MACT EU (dry APCS < 400°F)D/F TEQ INC 325C8 SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 460 2.26 2.43 2.16 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 325A1 SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 460 2.37 2.50 2.30 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT w 3.48 4.53 2.97 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 411 3.61 4.86 1.88 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 914C1 ? ? 4.39 4.39 4.39 Out: Unknown ACPSD/F TEQ INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS w 500 4.51 11.18 1.05 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS w 500 8.02 11.19 3.14 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 457 8.50 10.90 7.15 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 450 18.36 22.86 13.34 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 450 20.10 27.50 10.99 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM w 33.47 76.46 9.45 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM w 38.54 73.22 3.85 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)Page 1TABLE 4-2. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INDUSTRIAL KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS APCS PM APCD Stack Gas Conc (ng/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID Class Temp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ CK 208C1 ESP d 409 0.00 0.01 0.00 MACT source (409°F)D/F TEQ CK 207C1 MC/ESP d 418 0.02 0.02 0.02 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 205C3 ESP d 470 0.02 0.03 0.02 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 315C2 FF d 403 0.02 0.02 0.02 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ LWAK 336C2 FF d 400 0.04 0.04 0.04 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 401C4 ESP d 296 0.04 0.05 0.03 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 315C1 FF d 341 0.04 0.04 0.04 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 402C3 ESP d 276 0.04 0.05 0.04 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 206C4 ESP d 530 0.04 0.06 0.03 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ LWAK 336C1 FF d 400 0.04 0.05 0.04 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 401C3 ESP d 379 0.04 0.05 0.04 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 316C2 FF d 492 0.05 0.07 0.03 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 401C5 ESP d 365 0.05 0.06 0.03 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 322C53 ESP d 374 0.05 0.05 0.05 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 323C52 ESP d 351 0.05 0.05 0.05 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 306C1 MC/FF d 547 0.05 0.06 0.05 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C52 ESP d 497 0.06 0.09 0.04 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 323C50 ESP d 360 0.07 0.17 0.04 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 322C54 ESP d 455 0.09 0.09 0.08 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 320C1 FF d 484 0.09 0.13 0.05 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 228C4 ESP d 381 0.12 0.21 0.07 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 319C51 ESP d 568 0.13 0.20 0.05 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 402C4 ESP d 350 0.13 0.15 0.11 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 304C3 ESP d 417 0.14 0.18 0.09 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 319C9 ESP d 426 0.16 0.20 0.11 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 405C1 ESP d 256 0.17 0.28 0.10 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 205C4 ESP d 470 0.20 0.37 0.05 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319B1 ESP d 462 0.34 0.48 0.24 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 228C3 ESP d 459 0.37 0.57 0.21 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C52 ESP d 415 0.45 0.45 0.45 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 204C2 ESP d 597 0.47 0.75 0.28 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 406C1 ESP d 352 0.50 0.95 0.30 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 316C1 FF d 507 0.58 1.54 0.09 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 335C50 ESP d 400 0.59 0.62 0.56 In: MACT EUPage 2TABLE 4-2. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INDUSTRIAL KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS APCS PM APCD Stack Gas Conc (ng/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID Class Temp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ CK 319C54 ESP d 518 0.60 0.61 0.60 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 319C53 ESP d 499 0.62 1.11 0.32 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 323C51 ESP d 400 0.79 0.91 0.67 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 319C50 ESP d 562 0.95 1.07 0.77 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C51 ESP d 460 1.00 1.00 1.00 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 404C1 ESP d 498 1.02 1.55 0.60 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 402C1 ESP d 433 1.02 1.39 0.64 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 204C3 ESP d 596 1.10 1.79 0.75 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 319C5 ESP d 443 1.12 1.12 1.12 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 317C2 FF d 505 1.13 1.16 1.06 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 317C3 FF d 500 1.32 1.32 1.32 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 401C1 ESP d 436 1.76 3.84 0.35 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 206C3 ESP d 563 1.97 2.51 1.40 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 304C1 ESP d 527 3.62 4.23 3.18 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C1 ESP d 537 3.72 5.90 2.59 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 403C1 ESP d 493 3.82 12.64 0.50 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 203C1 ESP d 383 5.06 7.64 1.95 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 323C1 ESP d 490 5.18 9.39 2.56 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C50 ESP d 500 5.60 8.37 3.64 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C7 ESP d 474 5.79 5.79 5.79 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C6 ESP d 527 7.54 9.35 5.74 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 300C2 ESP d 608 10.97 13.20 6.63 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C2 ESP d 593 19.71 25.83 14.70 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 335C1 ESP d 718 32.42 50.52 21.82 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 305C3 ESP d 741 49.46 62.26 29.67 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 309C1 MC/ESP d 641 49.86 57.34 40.14 Out: High APCD temperatureTABLE 4-3. PM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM INC 500C4 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.000 0.000 0.000 Out: Source category outlierPM INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 0.000 0.001 0.000 MACT source (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.001 0.001 0.000 Out: Not MACTPM INC 350C2 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.000 Out: MACT (FF), High A/C (9.4)PM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.001 0.001 0.001 Out: HW not burnedPM INC 350C6 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.001 Out: MACT (FF), High A/C (8.8)PM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.001 0.001 0.001 In: MACT (FF, A/C=2.6)PM INC 350C3 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.002 0.000 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=10)PM INC 350C9 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.000 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=8.3)PM INC 350C5 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.001 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=9)PM INC 350C4 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.001 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=9)PM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.001 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.0)PM INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.001 0.002 0.000 In: MACT EU (FF)PM INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 0.001 0.001 0.000 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.7)PM INC 350C8 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.001 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=8.6)PM INC 349C3 QC/FF/QC/PT 0.001 0.001 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.0)PM INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 0.001 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM INC 349C2 QC/FF/QC/PT 0.001 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.001 0.002 0.001 Out: Not MACTPM INC 349C4 QC/FF/QC/PT 0.001 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)PM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 0.001 0.002 0.000 Out: Not MACTPM INC 222C5 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.001 0.003 0.001 Out: Not MACTPM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 0.001 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF/HEPA)PM INC 726C2 QC/CS/DM/VS 0.001 0.002 0.001 Out: Not MACTPM INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 0.001 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM INC 354C3 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.001 0.002 0.001 Out: Not MACTPM INC 333C2 SD/FF 0.001 0.003 0.001 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=9.9)PM INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM 0.001 0.002 0.001 Out: Not MACTPM INC 209C7 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.002 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 350C1 WHB/HE/FF 0.002 0.003 0.001 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=9.2)PM INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.002 0.002 0.002 Out: Not MACTPM INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 0.002 0.003 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.6)PM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.002 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 0.002 0.003 0.001 Out: Not MACTTABLE 4-3. PM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 0.002 0.002 0.002 Out: Not MACTPM INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 0.002 0.003 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.7)PM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.002 0.003 0.001 Out: Not MACTPM INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.002 0.003 0.001 Out: Not MACTPM INC 333C1 SD/FF 0.002 0.005 0.000 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=9.7)PM INC 703C2 WHB 0.002 0.003 0.001 Out: Not MACTPM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.003 0.003 0.003 Out: HW not burnedPM INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.003 0.003 0.002 Out: Not MACTPM INC 209C4 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.003 0.004 0.000 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.0)PM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 0.003 0.005 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.003 0.004 0.002 Out: Not MACTPM INC 339C1 AT/PT/RJS/ESP 0.003 0.003 0.002 Out: Not MACTPM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 0.003 0.003 0.003 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=7.6)PM INC 714C4 WS 0.003 0.004 0.003 Out: Not MACTPM INC 904C2 ? 0.003 0.004 0.003 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 222C7 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.003 0.006 0.002 Out: Not MACTPM INC 703C1 WHB 0.004 0.004 0.003 Out: Not MACTPM INC 726C1 QC/CS/DM/VS 0.004 0.004 0.003 Out: Not MACTPM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.004 0.005 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.004 0.004 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 0.004 0.006 0.002 Out: Not MACTPM INC 500C2 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.004 0.005 0.002 Out: Not MACTPM INC 914C1 ? 0.004 0.004 0.004 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 351C2 GC/C/FF 0.004 0.005 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.8)PM INC 209C8 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.005 0.008 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 600C2 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 0.005 0.006 0.004 Out: Not MACTPM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.005 0.006 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 349C1 QC/FF/QC/PT 0.005 0.006 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.1)PM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 0.005 0.007 0.004 Out: Not MACTPM INC 351C1 GC/C/FF 0.005 0.007 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)PM INC 714C3 WS 0.006 0.006 0.005 Out: Not MACTPM INC 400C1 SD/FF 0.006 0.008 0.005 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 0.006 0.007 0.006 Out: Not MACTPM INC 209C5 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.007 0.009 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)TABLE 4-3. PM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM INC 210C2 FF/S 0.007 0.013 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.5)PM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 0.007 0.009 0.005 Out: Not MACTPM INC 209C3 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.008 0.012 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 331C1 PT/IWS 0.008 0.010 0.007 Out: Not MACTPM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 0.008 0.011 0.005 Out: Not MACTPM INC 210C1 FF/S 0.008 0.018 0.002 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.4)PM INC 211C1 FF/S 0.009 0.011 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=4.1)PM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 0.009 0.013 0.006 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=7.1)PM INC 714C2 WS 0.009 0.011 0.008 Out: Not MACTPM INC 727C1 GC/C/FF 0.010 0.012 0.009 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.2)PM INC 600C1 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 0.010 0.012 0.008 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.010 0.012 0.009 Out: Not MACTPM INC 808C2 QT/PBS/ESP 0.011 0.018 0.007 Out: Not MACTPM INC 209C6 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.011 0.017 0.005 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.8)PM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.011 0.015 0.004 Out: Not MACTPM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 0.011 0.013 0.010 Out: Not MACTPM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.012 0.013 0.008 Out: Not MACTPM INC 351C3 GC/C/FF 0.012 0.015 0.008 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.5)PM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.012 0.013 0.012 Out: Not MACTPM INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 0.013 0.013 0.012 Out: Not MACTPM INC 350C7 WHB/HE/FF 0.013 0.014 0.012 Out: APCS bypassedPM INC 904C1 ? 0.013 0.015 0.011 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 0.013 0.019 0.003 Out: Not MACTPM INC 324C3 ? 0.014 0.037 0.004 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 351C4 GC/C/FF 0.014 0.015 0.013 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.3)PM INC 708C3 WS/ESP 0.014 0.017 0.012 Out: Not MACTPM INC 359C1 WHB/FF/S 0.014 0.035 0.006 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=5.5)PM INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 0.014 0.016 0.012 Out: Not MACTPM INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 0.015 0.018 0.013 Out: Not MACTPM INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 0.015 0.020 0.011 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C3 QT/WS 0.015 0.020 0.010 Out: Not MACTPM INC 704C1 NONE 0.015 0.020 0.011 Out: Not MACTPM INC 708C1 WS/ESP 0.016 0.018 0.012 Out: Not MACTPM INC 904C3 ? 0.016 0.028 0.010 Out: Unknown APCSTABLE 4-3. PM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM INC 710C1 QT/OS/C/S 0.017 0.018 0.015 Out: Not MACTPM INC 214C1 IWS 0.017 0.024 0.009 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.017 0.020 0.015 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C4 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.018 0.019 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM INC 324C1 ? 0.018 0.071 0.004 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 214C3 IWS 0.019 0.020 0.018 Out: Not MACTPM INC 359C2 WHB/FF/S 0.019 0.043 0.006 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=5.7)PM INC 216C7 HES/WS 0.020 0.029 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM INC 504C1 VS/C 0.021 0.039 0.013 Out: Not MACTPM INC 710C2 QT/OS/C/S 0.021 0.022 0.021 Out: Not MACTPM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 0.021 0.024 0.019 Out: Not MACTPM INC 725C1 WS/QT 0.022 0.029 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM INC 711C1 C/VS/AS 0.022 0.029 0.018 Out: Not MACTPM INC 704C2 NONE 0.022 0.028 0.014 Out: Not MACTPM INC 712C2 NONE 0.022 0.027 0.020 Out: Not MACTPM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.022 0.026 0.019 Out: Not MACTPM INC 702A3 QT/S/C 0.022 0.023 0.021 Out: Not MACTPM INC 212C1 FF/S 0.022 0.024 0.020 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.1)PM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 0.023 0.026 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM INC 324C2 ? 0.023 0.071 0.005 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 915C3 QC/VS/C 0.024 0.037 0.015 Out: Not MACTPM INC 357C1 QC/VS/PT/IWS 0.025 0.033 0.018 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.026 0.026 0.025 Out: Not MACTPM INC 354C4 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.026 0.037 0.017 Out: Not MACTPM INC 358C2 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.026 0.029 0.025 Out: Not MACTPM INC 701C2 VS/PT 0.026 0.027 0.024 Out: Not MACTPM INC 359C3 WHB/FF/S 0.026 0.066 0.006 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=5.7)PM INC 358C4 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.027 0.027 0.026 Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C6 HES/WS 0.027 0.033 0.022 Out: Not MACTPM INC 808C1 QT/PBS/ESP 0.027 0.060 0.009 Out: Not MACTPM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 0.028 0.032 0.025 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=5.5)PM INC 214C2 IWS 0.028 0.034 0.017 Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C1 HES/WS 0.028 0.029 0.026 Out: Not MACTPM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.028 0.039 0.022 Out: Not MACTTABLE 4-3. PM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM INC 706C3 QT/HS/C 0.028 0.034 0.025 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C7 QT/WS 0.029 0.030 0.026 Out: Not MACTPM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 0.029 0.035 0.024 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=5.2)PM INC 324C4 ? 0.029 0.115 0.005 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscf, Unknown APCSPM INC 700C2 SD/RJS/VS/WS 0.030 0.033 0.028 Out: Not MACTPM INC 806C2 C/VS 0.031 0.031 0.030 Out: Not MACTPM INC 329C1 PT/IWS 0.031 0.037 0.027 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.031 0.035 0.028 Out: Not MACTPM INC 711C2 C/VS/AS 0.031 0.049 0.022 Out: Not MACTPM INC 356C1 QC/AS/FN/S/DM 0.032 0.035 0.031 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707A2 QT/WS 0.033 0.038 0.028 Out: Not MACTPM INC 358C1 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.033 0.036 0.031 Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C5 HES/WS 0.033 0.041 0.027 Out: Not MACTPM INC 701C1 VS/PT 0.033 0.038 0.028 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C2 QT/WS 0.034 0.036 0.030 Out: Not MACTPM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.034 0.049 0.022 Out: Not MACTPM INC 714C5 WS 0.035 0.040 0.028 Out: Not MACTPM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 0.036 0.040 0.033 Out: Not MACTPM INC 906C5 QT/PT 0.036 0.043 0.029 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C4 QT/WS 0.037 0.038 0.036 Out: Not MACTPM INC 784C1 NONE 0.037 0.039 0.034 Out: Not MACTPM INC 712C1 NONE 0.038 0.067 0.023 Out: Not MACTPM INC 706C1 QT/HS/C 0.038 0.040 0.034 Out: Not MACTPM INC 714C1 WS 0.038 0.044 0.032 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C1 QT/WS 0.038 0.049 0.026 Out: Not MACTPM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0.038 0.055 0.024 Out: Not MACTPM INC 702A2 QT/S/C 0.042 0.051 0.028 Out: Not MACTPM INC 710C3 QT/OS/C/S 0.042 0.044 0.038 Out: Not MACTPM INC 358C3 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.043 0.045 0.041 Out: Not MACTPM INC 711C3 C/VS/AS 0.043 0.045 0.039 Out: Not MACTPM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0.043 0.100 0.013 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 728C1 QT/PT/VS 0.044 0.045 0.043 Out: Not MACTPM INC 784C2 NONE 0.044 0.047 0.042 Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C4 HES/WS 0.044 0.051 0.032 Out: Not MACTTABLE 4-3. PM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM INC 707C8 QT/WS 0.045 0.047 0.043 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707A1 QT/WS 0.046 0.049 0.043 Out: Not MACTPM INC 353C3 QC/VS/DM/ESP 0.047 0.049 0.045 Out: Not MACTPM INC 702A1 QT/S/C 0.047 0.053 0.043 Out: Not MACTPM INC 708C2 WS/ESP 0.049 0.069 0.033 Out: Not MACTPM INC 709C1 NONE 0.051 0.106 0.014 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 805C1 QT/QS/VS/ES/PBS 0.054 0.058 0.049 Out: Not MACTPM INC 806C1 C/VS 0.056 0.064 0.044 Out: Not MACTPM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 0.057 0.061 0.053 Out: Not MACTPM INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 0.058 0.075 0.040 Out: Not MACTPM INC 915C2 QC/VS/C 0.058 0.062 0.052 Out: Not MACTPM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 0.059 0.063 0.057 Out: Not MACTPM INC 706C2 QT/HS/C 0.062 0.066 0.057 Out: Not MACTPM INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 0.062 0.107 0.037 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 713C1 VS/PT 0.065 0.068 0.059 Out: Not MACTPM INC 825C1 CCS/QC/ESP 0.065 0.080 0.030 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C1 QT/PT 0.066 0.093 0.048 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 701C3 VS/PT 0.069 0.078 0.060 Out: Not MACTPM INC 915C4 QC/VS/C 0.071 0.076 0.066 Out: Not MACTPM INC 702C7 QT/S/C 0.072 0.107 0.041 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C3 QT/PT 0.072 0.075 0.068 Out: Not MACTPM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C 0.076 0.078 0.074 Out: Not MACTPM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 0.077 0.095 0.057 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C4 QT/PT 0.087 0.094 0.076 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C2 QT/PT 0.089 0.114 0.076 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 702C6 QT/S/C 0.090 0.104 0.081 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 702C8 QT/S/C 0.109 0.132 0.081 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 332C1 WS 0.114 0.133 0.097 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 727C2 GC/C/FF 0.157 0.216 0.100 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 702C9 QT/S/C 0.188 0.189 0.186 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 707C9 QT/WS 1.901 5.590 0.029 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfTABLE 4-4. PM, CEMENT KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM CK 315C2 FF 0.001 0.001 0.000 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.8)PM CK 315C1 FF 0.001 0.001 0.001 Source already in MACT poolPM CK 317C3 FF 0.002 0.004 0.001 Out: HW not burnedPM CK 317C1 FF 0.002 0.003 0.002 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.3)PM CK 317C2 FF 0.003 0.004 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF)PM CK 320C1 FF 0.003 0.006 0.001 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=2.3)PM CK 404C2 ESP 0.004 0.005 0.004 Out: Not MACTPM CK 404C1 ESP 0.007 0.018 0.004 Out: Not MACTPM CK 318C2 ESP 0.010 0.011 0.008 Out: Not MACTPM CK 30151 FF 0.011 0.017 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)PM CK 316C1 FF 0.011 0.012 0.010 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM CK 316C2 FF 0.012 0.013 0.012 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM CK 200C1 FF 0.014 0.016 0.011 Out: MACT (FF), High A/CPM CK 203C1 ESP 0.014 0.017 0.011 Out: Not MACTPM CK 208C1 ESP 0.014 0.015 0.012 Out: Not MACTPM CK 208C2 ESP 0.016 0.025 0.011 Out: Not MACTPM CK 306C1 MC/FF 0.016 0.023 0.012 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)PM CK 207C2 MC/ESP 0.018 0.024 0.010 Out: Not MACTPM CK 406C1 ESP 0.019 0.026 0.015 Out: Not MACTPM CK 322C1 ESP 0.019 0.033 0.011 Out: Not MACTPM CK 308C1 ESP 0.021 0.024 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM CK 323C1 ESP 0.022 0.033 0.005 Out: Not MACTPM CK 202C1 FF 0.022 0.025 0.020 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.9)PM CK 309C2 MC/ESP 0.023 0.035 0.013 Out: Not MACTPM CK 206C1 ESP 0.023 0.029 0.015 Out: Not MACTPM CK 303C1 QC/FF 0.023 0.025 0.021 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=2.2)PM CK 335C1 ESP 0.023 0.033 0.017 Out: Not MACTPM CK 303C2 QC/FF 0.024 0.026 0.023 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=2.3)PM CK 309C1 MC/ESP 0.026 0.029 0.022 Out: Not MACTPM CK 207C1 MC/ESP 0.028 0.032 0.026 Out: Not MACTPM CK 204C1 ESP 0.028 0.032 0.024 Out: Not MACTPM CK 202C2 FF 0.031 0.042 0.025 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.9)PM CK 403C2 ESP 0.031 0.039 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM CK 402C1 ESP 0.033 0.049 0.022 Out: Not MACTTABLE 4-4. PM, CEMENT KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM CK 302C1 ESP 0.034 0.060 0.020 Out: Not MACTPM CK 405C1 ESP 0.035 0.065 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM CK 403C1 ESP 0.035 0.049 0.025 Out: Not MACTPM CK 201C1 FF 0.036 0.109 0.008 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 319C1 ESP 0.037 0.040 0.034 Out: Not MACTPM CK 30141 FF 0.039 0.053 0.029 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM CK 30143 FF 0.041 0.046 0.031 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=0.9)PM CK 401C4 ESP 0.041 0.051 0.030 Out: Not MACTPM CK 401C1 ESP 0.048 0.061 0.038 Out: Not MACTPM CK 401C3 ESP 0.049 0.053 0.042 Out: Not MACTPM CK 30153 FF 0.050 0.078 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.6)PM CK 205C1 ESP 0.050 0.058 0.045 Out: Not MACTPM CK 304C1 ESP 0.057 0.064 0.049 Out: Not MACTPM CK 305C1 ESP 0.064 0.072 0.053 Out: Not MACTPM CK 300C1 ESP 0.071 0.083 0.057 Out: Not MACT, > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 305C3 ESP 0.074 0.075 0.072 Out: Not MACTPM CK 401C5 ESP 0.077 0.105 0.063 Out: Not MACT, > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 305C2 ESP 0.080 0.086 0.075 Out: Not MACT, > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 402C5 ESP 0.085 0.119 0.064 Out: Not MACT, > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 321C1 ESP 0.210 0.490 0.035 Out: Not MACT, > 0.08 gr/dscfTABLE 4-5. PM, LWAKs, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM LWAK 225C1 FF 0.000 0.001 0.000 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5)PM LWAK 227C1 FF 0.001 0.002 0.001 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=2.8)PM LWAK 226C1 FF 0.002 0.004 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=)PM LWAK 223C1 FF 0.004 0.008 0.002 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM LWAK 224C1 FF 0.005 0.009 0.002 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)PM LWAK 311C1 FF 0.006 0.007 0.004 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.9)PM LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 0.007 0.008 0.006 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.2)PM LWAK 313C1 FF 0.007 0.008 0.006 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4)PM LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 0.008 0.012 0.006 Out: MACT (FF, High A/C, A/C=4.3)PM LWAK 336C1 FF 0.009 0.011 0.007 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM LWAK 312C1 FF 0.010 0.018 0.005 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)PM LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 0.010 0.016 0.006 Out: MACT (FF, High A/C, A/C=4.4)PM LWAK 310C1 FF 0.018 0.026 0.013 Out: MACT (FF, High A/C, A/C=3.6)PM LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 0.022 0.014 0.013 Out: MACT (FF, High A/C, A/C=4.4)PM LWAK 314C1 FF 0.022 0.029 0.012 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4)TABLE 4-6. MERCURY, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 51.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 99.90 MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 5.1e1)Mercury INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 35.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 99.70 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 216C7 HES/WS 0.3 0.3 0.2 Out: No MTECMercury INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 0.4 0.7 0.2 Out: No MTECMercury INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.5 0.5 0.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 5.1 0.8 1.0 0.6 84.95 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 18.5 0.9 1.0 0.9 94.93 Out: Not MACTMercury INC 216C5 HES/WS 1.0 1.7 0.1 Out: No MTECMercury INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 1.2 1.5 0.8 Out: No MTECMercury INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 8.6 1.3 2.2 0.9 84.26 Out: Not MACTMercury INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1861.7 1.4 3.4 0.6 99.92 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 725C1 WS/QT 1.7 1.8 1.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 2.5 5.3 1.1 Out: No MTECMercury INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 234.1 2.5 2.6 2.5 98.91 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0.1 2.8 6.1 0.4 -4963.30 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 106.1 2.9 3.4 2.3 97.29 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 253.8 3.1 4.5 0.3 98.76 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 3.4 3.4 3.4 Out: No MTECMercury INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 37.8 4.0 6.4 1.8 89.43 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 4.1 11.3 1.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 8.5 4.3 5.8 1.9 48.99 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 0.1 4.6 4.7 4.5 -6107.24 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 9.4 4.7 6.0 3.6 50.34 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.7 5.3 6.8 3.4 -638.81 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 0.2 5.8 8.3 3.2 -2980.36 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 6.2 7.7 4.4 Out: No MTECMercury INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 6.5 7.9 5.4 Out: No MTECMercury INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 182.6 7.6 9.4 5.7 95.85 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 296.9 9.9 16.0 7.3 96.68 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 14.3 10.7 20.1 1.2 24.89 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 135.7 12.3 13.9 10.1 90.92 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 16.1 22.4 12.0 Out: No MTECMercury INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 1.8 17.9 18.4 17.5 -894.48 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemPage 1TABLE 4-6. MERCURY, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 15.4 19.2 34.7 7.3 -24.26 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 9.3 19.3 30.1 3.8 -107.56 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC 400C1 SD/FF 27680.5 19.4 26.4 15.7 99.93 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 52.1 25.2 43.2 11.4 51.72 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 95.8 27.1 30.3 22.0 71.67 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 30.2 27.2 50.0 10.7 9.64 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 27.7 43.3 8.2 Out: No MTECMercury INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 263.1 30.1 44.8 19.8 88.56 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 214C3 IWS 3357.9 31.7 46.5 22.5 99.06 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 331C1 PT/IWS 38.8 52.3 18.6 Out: No MTECMercury INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 42.9 94.0 4.6 Out: No MTECMercury INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 60.1 44.4 65.6 8.4 26.17 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/M (CO - 325C6/5)Mercury INC 216C6 HES/WS 44.6 106.3 11.9 Out: No MTECMercury INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 32.3 47.7 54.4 42.1 -47.88 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 214C2 IWS 70348.9 48.8 90.3 19.2 99.93 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 89.6 103.3 75.9 Out: No MTECMercury INC 806C2 C/VS 117.8 146.2 84.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 806C1 C/VS 172.6 195.5 129.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS 177.8 517.2 6.6 Out: No MTECMercury INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 69.7 188.1 278.8 146.5 -170.11 Out: MACT (FC), MB problemMercury INC 216C3 HES/WS 261.0 679.9 37.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 75.6 394.5 570.1 285.4 -421.63 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC 214C1 IWS 481.6 784.0 128.8 Out: No MTECMercury INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 123.3 1121.5 2396.7 154.1 -809.79 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC 504C1 VS/C 2146.1 1322.7 2342.9 77.8 38.37 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 477.4 1360.7 2067.9 563.9 -185.04 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemPage 2TABLE 4-7. MERCURY, CEMENT KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury CK 303C1 QC/FF 0 3 4 3 98.42 Out: HW not burnedMercury CK 404C1 ESP 28 4 7 2 89.73 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 2.8e1)Mercury CK 305C3 ESP 129872 5 7 4 100.00 Out: MB problemMercury CK 201C1 FF 5 15 1 Out: No MTECMercury CK 203C1 ESP 10 6 6 6 85.58 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 406C1 ESP 108 8 16 5 93.43 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 200C1 FF 11 21 3 Out: No MTECMercury CK 305C1 ESP 29 16 18 13 92.88 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 207C1 MC/ESP 6 17 22 13 84.16 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 206C1 ESP 19 17 23 13 99.92 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 204C1 ESP 5 19 24 15 82.06 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 402C1 ESP 118 19 38 8 99.81 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 208C1 ESP 6 20 25 12 81.30 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 202C2 FF 7 20 22 18 64.43 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 405C1 ESP 153 21 26 12 87.72 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 205C1 ESP 10 30 37 23 48.91 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 401C5 ESP 47 36 50 19 37.73 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 304C1 ESP 9 42 52 28 56.53 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 309C1 MC/ESP 88 43 54 36 71.80 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 402C4 ESP 33 51 70 39 -12.77 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 319C1 ESP 5 56 59 53 25.49 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 335C1 ESP 25813 60 100 39 99.77 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 303C3 QC/FF 53 92 172 48 75.75 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 30152 FF 240 106 143 117 84.52 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 30142 FF 240 128 139 69 81.27 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 401C1 ESP 545 148 382 44 73.36 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 403C1 ESP 62 1014 1598 719 -1237.61 Out: MB problem, DL measurementMercury CK 306C1 MC/FF 3339 2988 4574 1048 22.11 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECPage 1TABLE 4-8. MERCURY, LWAKs, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury LWAK 313C1 FF 17 0 1 0 99.24 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.7e1)Mercury LWAK 225C1 FF 3 5 6 3 67.38 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK 312C1 FF 12 9 10 8 79.49 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK 310C1 FF 11 15 20 11 60.35 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK 311C1 FF 24 15 19 11 73.76 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK 224C1 FF 10 16 19 14 44.80 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK 227C1 FF 10 17 19 16 73.24 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK 314C1 FF 63 22 25 16 80.74 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK 223C1 FF 17 32 34 30 30.66 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 2328 422 456 324 82.57 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 1991 472 511 431 77.15 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 2212 493 511 472 78.50 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 2142 561 760 403 74.69 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECPage 1TABLE 4-9. SVM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM INC 325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1 2 1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 712C1 NONE 0 2 2 2 Out: MB problem, Sub. > 75%SVM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 48776 3 3 2 MACT source (VS/IWS w/ MTEC of 4.9e4) (FF as ET)SVM INC 712C2 NONE 1 3 4 2 Out: MB problem, Sub. > 75%SVM INC 222C5 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 3 6 2 Out: No MTECSVM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 168 4 5 2 Out: Not MACTSVM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 4 4 4 Out: No MTECSVM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 5795 6 7 4 Out: Not MACTSVM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 188533 7 8 6 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 495 10 11 10 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 129450 11 19 6 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 11 12 9 Out: No MTECSVM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 12 13 9 Out: No MTECSVM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 13 20 8 Out: No MTECSVM INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 4666 13 23 3 Out: Not MACT (VS)SVM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 3786 13 20 9 Out: Not MACT (ESP)SVM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 14 14 14 Out: No MTECSVM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 403 17 24 10 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 21 30 13 Out: No MTECSVM INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 2077 22 31 9 Out: Not MACT (VS)SVM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 904 23 54 7 Out: Not MACTSVM INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 3798 23 55 7 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 24 39 16 Out: No MTECSVM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 240 24 25 23 Out: Not MACT (VS)SVM INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 11148 25 37 16 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 89 25 27 23 Out: Not MACTSVM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1 27 31 23 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problem, Sub. > 85%, DL measurementSVM INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 28 31 24 Out: No MTECSVM INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 1290 29 39 23 Out: Not MACT (VS)SVM INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 31 34 28 Out: No MTECSVM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 125 35 42 25 Out: Not MACTSVM INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 10366 37 57 21 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 725C1 WS/QT 37 44 29 Out: No MTECSVM INC 349C3 QC/FF/QC/PT 532412 39 44 37 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECTABLE 4-9. SVM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 375 42 63 14 Out: Not MACT (VS)SVM INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 443 44 71 23 Out: Not MACT (VS)SVM INC 504C1 VS/C 14632 44 75 24 Out: Not MACT (VS)SVM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 48240 56 77 40 Out: Not MACT (ET VS)SVM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 10716 58 140 13 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1 64 71 57 Out: Not MACT (ET VS), MB problemSVM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0 71 76 66 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problem, Sub. > 91%, DL measurementSVM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 89 114 63 Out: No MTECSVM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 4884 91 163 54 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (325C7)SVM INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 45856 94 148 63 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 163 101 122 78 Out: Not MACTSVM INC 216C3 HES/WS 103 178 58 Out: No MTECSVM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0 116 163 66 Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 214C1 IWS 201 384 75 Out: No MTECSVM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 210 335 128 Out: No MTECSVM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 5805 225 472 91 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (325C7)SVM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 227 263 175 Out: No MTECSVM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 358 244 253 235 Out: Not MACTSVM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 4360 245 366 115 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (325C7)SVM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 174720 262 370 206 Out: Not MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 153 301 484 199 Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 230683 312 429 233 Out: Not MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 332 522 191 Out: No MTECSVM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 108 418 494 324 Out: Not MACT, MB problemSVM INC 806C2 C/VS 461 496 391 Out: No MTECSVM INC 324C1 ? 537 1532 95 Out: No MTECSVM INC 806C1 C/VS 591 726 444 Out: No MTECSVM INC 400C1 SD/FF 2538985 656 813 407 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 214C2 IWS 151644 689 905 328 Out: Not MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 302756 721 722 719 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 216C7 HES/WS 826 1076 404 Out: No MTECSVM INC 324C4 ? 838 2108 121 Out: No MTECSVM INC 809C1 VS 20803 865 991 766 Out: Not MACT (VS)SVM INC 810C1 Q/VS/PBS 56371 882 1095 522 Out: Not MACT (VS), High MTECTABLE 4-9. SVM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 68334 911 1220 694 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 993 1402 547 Out: No MTECSVM INC 214C3 IWS 343542 1000 1322 446 Out: Not MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 216C5 HES/WS 1021 1279 778 Out: No MTECSVM INC 216C6 HES/WS 1045 1279 771 Out: No MTECSVM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C 1284 1582 1043 Out: No MTECSVM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 1509 2247 1016 Out: No MTECSVM INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 566 1706 2575 952 Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 810C2 Q/VS/PBS 653523 1777 2041 1399 Out: Not MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 324C2 ? 3040 18083 158 Out: No MTECSVM INC 331C1 PT/IWS 3465 4705 1992 Out: No MTECSVM INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 122029 7964 13516 3413 Out: MACT (WS/ESP), High MTECSVM INC 324C3 ? 8262 53289 152 Out: No MTECSVM INC 809C2 VS 205717 19769 23051 16802 Out: Not MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 222057 29350 37804 24633 Out: Not MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 905C1 QT/VS/AS/CS 13398 29761 39956 23066 Out: Not MACT (VS), MB problemTABLE 4-10. SVM, CEMENT KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM CK 320C1 FF 33453 4 7 2 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.1, w/ MTEC of 3.6e4)SVM CK 316C2 FF 65771 6 8 4 Source already in MACT poolSVM CK 316C1 FF 83491 6 7 6 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.2), High MTECSVM CK 30142 FF 76266 9 12 6 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.3), High MTECSVM CK 321C1 ESP 207029 11 22 5 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 303C1 QC/FF 13000 13 14 12 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.2)SVM CK 30152 FF 76266 15 29 4 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.6), High MTECSVM CK 306C1 MC/FF 48726 17 24 10 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.8), High MTECSVM CK 315C2 FF 157511 18 27 14 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECSVM CK 315C1 FF 163256 21 34 14 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.6), High MTECSVM CK 317C1 FF 42728 28 30 27 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.3), High MTECSVM CK 317C3 FF 0 29 29 29 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)SVM CK 317C2 FF 42189 29 30 28 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.1), High MTECSVM CK 403C1 ESP 127283 30 34 25 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 303C3 QC/FF 26096 33 38 22 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)SVM CK 404C1 ESP 60982 57 68 49 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 200C1 FF 26905 62 71 41 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4), High A/CSVM CK 208C2 ESP 15158 87 117 61 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 308C1 ESP 27457 93 107 83 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 208C1 ESP 30942 98 141 73 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 202C2 FF 185075 109 114 99 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.5), High MTECSVM CK 318C2 ESP 113263 140 164 127 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 322C1 ESP 137960 151 169 135 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 207C2 MC/ESP 49680 258 636 80 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 206C1 ESP 164386 273 318 230 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 401C1 ESP 74007 382 704 219 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 204C1 ESP 212177 505 781 262 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 207C1 MC/ESP 82353 507 726 312 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 203C1 ESP 158786 528 613 421 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 309C1 MC/ESP 81002 543 748 299 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 304C1 ESP 140000 599 646 535 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 406C1 ESP 121721 662 932 437 Out: Not MACT, DL measurementSVM CK 319C1 ESP 220000 678 1148 261 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 335C1 ESP 75279 752 933 629 Out: Not MACTTABLE 4-10. SVM, CEMENT KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM CK 402C1 ESP 207994 815 1313 381 Out: Not MACT, DL measurementSVM CK 305C3 ESP 67136 897 1154 631 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 201C1 FF 172743 924 3554 44 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECSVM CK 323C1 ESP 145718 973 1340 713 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 205C1 ESP 139789 1169 1512 560 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 405C1 ESP 77813 1170 1912 896 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 305C1 ESP 152835 1322 1698 1022 Out: Not MACT, DL measurementSVM CK 302C1 ESP 369251 1529 3030 677 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 401C5 ESP 148756 1966 4237 623 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 300C2 ESP 455411 2345 4865 702 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 402C4 ESP 45400 6047 6651 5512 Out: Not MACTTABLE 4-11. SVM, LWAKs, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM LWAK 225C1 FF 270004 1 1 1 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5, w/ MTEC of 2.7e5)SVM LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 53860 4 6 3 Out: Not MACT (FF/VS, A/C=4.2)SVM LWAK 224C1 FF 14691 4 5 3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)SVM LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 56984 4 7 2 Out: MACT (FF/VS, A/C = 4.4), High MTECSVM LWAK 223C1 FF 731989 5 6 4 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.2), High MTECSVM LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 51156 7 12 5 Out: MACT (FF/VS, A/C = 4.4)SVM LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 55659 10 15 7 Out: MACT (FF/VS, A/C = 4.3), High MTECSVM LWAK 227C1 FF 23904 31 60 12 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=2.8), High A/CSVM LWAK 312C1 FF 457634 403 622 163 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.8), High MTECSVM LWAK 310C1 FF 289 495 884 265 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=3.6), MB problem (low SRE)SVM LWAK 311C1 FF 374691 516 923 179 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.9), High MTECSVM LWAK 313C1 FF 687282 663 1290 250 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.4), High MTECSVM LWAK 314C1 FF 686565 1667 1835 1514 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.4), High MTECTABLE 4-12. LVM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm)CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1029 4 4 3 MACT source (VS w/ MTEC of 1.0e3) (Any PM control as ET)LVM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 6238 4 5 3 Out: High MTECLVM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 4 7 2 Out: No MTECLVM INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM 4 5 4 Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C1 GC/C/FF 6 9 5 Out: No MTECLVM INC 806C2 C/VS 7 10 6 Out: No MTECLVM INC 325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS 7 8 6 Out: No MTECLVM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 7 9 5 Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C2 GC/C/FF 8 9 4 Out: No MTECLVM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 1210 8 8 8 Out: High MTECLVM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 8 8 8 Out: No MTECLVM INC 806C1 C/VS 9 11 7 Out: No MTECLVM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 1439 10 10 9 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 26731 10 10 10 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 712C2 NONE 3 11 14 8 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 725 11 18 8 In: MACT EU (FF)LVM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 27853 11 12 10 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 5672 13 14 11 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 248537 14 19 10 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 15 30 5 Out: No MTECLVM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 17 17 17 Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C3 GC/C/FF 17 19 15 Out: No MTECLVM INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 1042 18 29 9 In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 7559 20 22 18 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 4589 23 34 16 Out: MACT (ET IWS), High MTECLVM INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 12504 28 41 7 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 1 28 38 22 Out: MACT (VS), MB problemLVM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 29 34 19 Out: No MTECLVM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 31 60 11 Out: No MTECLVM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 215385 31 38 23 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 7344 34 38 32 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 214C3 IWS 88167 34 51 20 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 66578 38 42 32 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 50 40 43 37 Out: Not MACTTABLE 4-12. LVM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm)CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 699 41 48 37 In: MACT EU (ET VS)LVM INC 216C6 HES/WS 47 53 36 Out: No MTECLVM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 3204 48 64 39 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 331C1 PT/IWS 50 64 31 Out: No MTECLVM INC 725C1 WS/QT 51 62 43 Out: No MTECLVM INC 216C5 HES/WS 51 59 38 Out: No MTECLVM INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 118 53 77 38 In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 271671 56 65 50 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 712C1 NONE 1 56 103 30 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 214C2 IWS 57412 59 87 24 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1407 60 79 51 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 12 63 67 55 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 58 65 85 34 Out: MACT (VS), MB problem (low SRE)LVM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 804 66 81 51 In: MACT EU (ET VS)LVM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 251 68 72 64 In: MACT EU (ET VS)LVM INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 72 81 63 Out: No MTECLVM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 588 77 80 75 In: MACT EU (ET VS)LVM INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 97 148 64 Out: No MTECLVM INC 324C1 ? 98 164 53 Out: No MTECLVM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 3868 101 212 27 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 400C1 SD/FF 622484 102 126 70 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 324C2 ? 112 208 42 Out: No MTECLVM INC 324C3 ? 115 176 49 Out: No MTECLVM INC 216C7 HES/WS 121 135 97 Out: No MTECLVM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 8552 122 146 109 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 9805 135 162 94 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 501 145 333 45 In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 35259 147 422 9 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 504C1 VS/C 73631 157 300 19 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 905C1 QT/VS/AS/CS 6832 181 197 162 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 239157 193 281 55 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 324C4 ? 194 527 47 Out: No MTECLVM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 198 335 129 Out: No MTECLVM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 367262 209 318 92 Out: Not MACTTABLE 4-12. LVM, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm)CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 538274 246 308 175 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 4247 261 431 167 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problemLVM INC 216C3 HES/WS 269 362 157 Out: No MTECLVM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 797 301 491 199 Out: MACT (IWS), MB problem (low SRE)LVM INC 810C1 Q/VS/PBS 55023 321 457 146 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 214C1 IWS 339 460 198 Out: No MTECLVM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 353 960 38 Out: No MTECLVM INC 809C1 VS 56047 397 469 353 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 6827 451 566 205 Out: MACT (ET IWS), High MTECLVM INC 915C4 QC/VS/C 612 898 446 Out: No MTECLVM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 194079 634 752 548 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 6851 721 789 668 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 21901 820 2101 204 Out: MACT (ET IWS), High MTECLVM INC 810C2 Q/VS/PBS 2250207 836 921 758 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C 873 1037 728 Out: No MTECLVM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 1064 1855 345 Out: No MTECLVM INC 809C2 VS 1332199 7224 7976 6552 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 10971 13042 8641 Out: No MTECLVM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 132678 157456 96750 Out: No MTECTABLE 4-13. LVM, CEMENT KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM CK 320C1 FF 25210 4 5 3 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.3, w/ MTEC of 2.5e4)LVM CK 316C2 FF 44108 5 6 4 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.2), High MTECLVM CK 204C1 ESP 143982 6 7 5 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 308C1 ESP 29513 7 9 5 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 206C1 ESP 205763 9 9 8 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 315C1 FF 258174 9 12 3 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 309C1 MC/ESP 106203 9 19 5 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 208C1 ESP 15357 10 11 8 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 303C3 QC/FF 25232 10 22 4 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)LVM CK 335C1 ESP 39270 11 11 11 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 315C2 FF 247408 11 11 11 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 316C1 FF 65167 11 14 9 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 321C1 ESP 83779 11 24 4 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 306C1 MC/FF 231592 13 15 12 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 208C2 ESP 7115 14 26 6 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 30142 FF 23371 16 19 14 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.3)LVM CK 30152 FF 23371 17 22 13 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)LVM CK 205C1 ESP 171391 19 23 13 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 318C2 ESP 15678 19 23 16 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 305C3 ESP 44058 20 21 20 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 317C1 FF 39252 23 25 23 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 317C3 FF 0 23 24 24 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)LVM CK 317C2 FF 35645 24 24 23 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 322C1 ESP 173846 24 29 16 Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 303C1 QC/FF 5610 25 39 18 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.3)LVM CK 401C5 ESP 15312 27 52 8 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=243)LVM CK 302C1 ESP 264797 27 43 19 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 202C2 FF 120729 29 30 29 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 203C1 ESP 47698 31 42 25 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=220)LVM CK 403C1 ESP 66049 34 37 32 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)LVM CK 305C1 ESP 86477 38 43 34 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=340), Poor D/O/M (low SCA)LVM CK 402C4 ESP 16212 50 59 40 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)LVM CK 207C2 MC/ESP 15408 55 294 6 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 304C1 ESP 170000 57 102 27 Out: Not MACT (ESP)TABLE 4-13. LVM, CEMENT KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM CK 207C1 MC/ESP 16590 57 160 9 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 319C1 ESP 15400 60 73 44 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 300C2 ESP 492419 102 197 38 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 323C1 ESP 154346 127 244 62 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 404C1 ESP 167319 130 170 97 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 402C1 ESP 199783 162 167 155 Out: Not MACT (ESP)LVM CK 401C1 ESP 30735 173 182 162 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)LVM CK 406C1 ESP 105475 184 191 180 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=340), Poor D/O/M (low SCA)LVM CK 405C1 ESP 176599 304 351 267 Out: Not MACT (ESP), High MTEC, DL measurementLVM CK 200C1 FF 354752 367 451 248 Out: Not MACT (FF), High MTEC, DL measurementLVM CK 201C1 FF 295437 520 1124 263 Out: MACT (FF), High MTEC, DL measurementTABLE 4-14. LVM, LWAKs, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM LWAK 225C1 FF 20344 10 12 9 Source already in MACT poolLVM LWAK 224C1 FF 36730 22 30 17 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5, w/ MTEC of 3.7e4)LVM LWAK 227C1 FF 6911 25 37 18 Source already in MACT poolLVM LWAK 223C1 FF 33422 34 37 30 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)LVM LWAK 312C1 FF 46190 37 54 22 Out: MAC (FF, A/C=1.8), High MTECLVM LWAK 311C1 FF 40635 41 52 36 Out: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.9), High MTECLVM LWAK 310C1 FF 166 60 88 31 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=3.6), High A/CLVM LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 54494 67 174 30 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.3), High A/CLVM LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 49464 122 164 81 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.4), High A/CLVM LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 52192 145 308 61 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.2), High A/CLVM LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 50080 206 743 13 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.4), High A/CLVM LWAK 314C1 FF 49552 227 317 162 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.4), High MTECLVM LWAK 313C1 FF 66835 289 329 245 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.4), High MTECTABLE 4-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.1 0.1 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 358C2 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 1.11E+07 0.2 0.2 0.2 100.00 MACT source (VS/S MTEC of 1.1e7)Tot Cl INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 0.2 0.3 0.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 342C2 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 7.00E+00 0.3 0.3 0.2 -5230.59 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 706C3 QT/HS/C 1.73E+07 0.3 0.3 0.3 100.00 Out: High MTECTot Cl INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 0.3 0.3 0.3 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 808C2 QT/PBS/ESP 2.09E+07 0.3 0.7 0.1 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 706C1 QT/HS/C 1.56E+07 0.4 0.5 0.2 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 354C3 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1.41E+07 0.4 0.4 0.3 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.4 0.5 0.3 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 337C2 WHB/DA/DI/FF 9.59E+04 0.4 0.5 0.3 99.37 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 728C1 QT/PT/VS 1.83E+07 0.4 0.8 0.0 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.5 1.6 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 600C1 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 3.05E+07 0.6 0.9 0.4 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 707C7 QT/WS 0.6 0.7 0.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 358C3 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.22E+07 0.6 0.8 0.3 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 0.6 0.8 0.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 808C1 QT/PBS/ESP 2.58E+07 0.7 1.1 0.3 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 711C1 C/VS/AS 9.09E+05 0.8 0.9 0.8 99.87 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 0.9 1.0 0.8 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 9.85E+07 0.9 1.1 0.6 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 711C2 C/VS/AS 1.70E+05 0.9 1.0 0.8 99.21 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 706C2 QT/HS/C 1.73E+07 1.0 1.4 0.2 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 708C3 WS/ESP 5.52E+07 1.0 2.3 0.3 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 214C3 IWS 5.05E+07 1.0 1.3 0.7 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 1.1 2.2 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 711C3 C/VS/AS 7.78E+05 1.1 1.2 1.0 99.80 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 701C2 VS/PT 1.1 2.3 0.4 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM 1.3 1.3 1.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 354C4 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1.3 2.2 0.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 708C2 WS/ESP 6.22E+07 1.4 2.6 0.3 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 500C4 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.54E+07 1.4 2.4 0.9 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.19E+07 1.4 3.2 0.3 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 708C1 WS/ESP 8.72E+07 1.4 2.7 0.8 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTABLE 4-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 1.6 1.9 1.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 1.7 3.3 0.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 707C1 QT/WS 1.7 3.7 0.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 1.8 3.9 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 359C2 WHB/FF/S 2.24E+07 1.8 2.1 1.5 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 2.62E+06 1.8 2.1 1.5 99.90 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 600C2 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 4.91E+07 1.8 2.4 0.8 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 325C8 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.8 4.9 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 2.84E+07 1.9 2.4 0.8 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 1.9 2.2 1.4 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 214C1 IWS 2.42E+07 1.9 2.0 1.8 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.85E+07 2.2 3.6 1.2 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 359C3 WHB/FF/S 1.60E+07 2.3 4.4 0.7 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 214C2 IWS 2.82E+07 2.3 3.0 2.0 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 3.33E+06 2.4 2.5 2.1 99.99 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 4.91E+06 2.4 2.7 1.8 99.93 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 209C4 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.13E+07 2.8 3.9 0.6 99.96 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 707A2 QT/WS 7.75E+06 2.9 3.7 2.3 99.94 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 3.2 3.7 2.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.71E+06 3.4 5.0 1.7 99.71 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 3.5 3.7 3.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 359C1 WHB/FF/S 2.25E+07 3.5 7.0 1.1 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 4.0 4.4 3.3 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 825C1 CCS/QC/ESP 3.45E+07 4.0 8.4 2.1 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 700C2 SD/RJS/VS/WS 1.74E+06 4.2 5.2 3.5 99.65 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 7.19E+06 4.3 5.7 0.0 99.91 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 358C1 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.68E+07 4.3 11.3 0.5 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C7 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.36E+07 4.3 5.6 3.7 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C8 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 4.81E+07 4.4 6.7 1.9 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 707C8 QT/WS 4.6 12.3 0.7 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 3.92E+07 4.6 6.1 2.6 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C5 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 2.72E+07 4.7 6.5 3.3 99.97 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 4.9 4.9 4.9 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 504C1 VS/C 6.38E+04 5.1 11.4 0.1 89.37 In: MACT EU (WS)TABLE 4-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.93E+08 5.5 7.0 4.1 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 7.32E+06 5.6 7.0 3.6 99.89 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 209C6 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.65E+07 5.8 6.3 5.2 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 714C4 WS 4.65E+06 6.2 7.6 3.8 99.80 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 3.27E+06 6.4 12.8 0.3 99.71 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 8.92E+05 6.8 17.9 1.1 98.89 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 707A1 QT/WS 7.2 8.2 5.8 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 701C3 VS/PT 7.2 8.0 5.9 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 357C1 QC/VS/PT/IWS 1.05E+07 7.5 10.3 5.0 99.90 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 707C9 QT/WS 8.17E+06 7.6 13.0 4.0 99.87 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 3.51E+06 7.7 11.4 4.3 99.97 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 707C2 QT/WS 6.48E+06 7.9 10.2 3.5 99.82 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 329C1 PT/IWS 2.00E+07 8.3 15.4 3.2 99.94 In: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 358C4 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.39E+07 9.1 9.6 8.2 99.97 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 9.2 10.1 8.0 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 9.7 12.2 7.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 216C7 HES/WS 9.7 11.4 8.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 805C1 QT/QS/VS/ES/PBS 3.47E+06 10.0 15.0 7.4 99.58 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 216C2 HES/WS 10.4 11.5 8.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 221C3 PT 11.4 13.0 8.4 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 339C1 AT/PT/RJS/ESP 3.56E+07 11.5 46.2 0.2 99.95 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 707C4 QT/WS 9.03E+06 11.8 13.2 10.7 99.81 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 12.3 19.7 5.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 4.18E+06 13.0 17.4 8.5 99.55 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 707C3 QT/WS 1.09E+07 13.0 20.4 9.2 99.83 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 4.45E+06 14.0 18.9 10.3 99.54 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 221C2 PT 14.7 16.7 13.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 210C1 FF/S 1.99E+07 15.7 27.7 5.9 99.89 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 221C1 PT 16.5 19.8 10.9 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.86E+07 16.6 24.6 6.5 99.94 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 9.62E+06 19.7 35.5 1.4 99.70 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 9.39E+06 21.7 28.5 17.2 99.66 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 2.37E+06 22.4 26.4 18.4 98.62 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 701C1 VS/PT 26.1 27.7 24.5 Out: No MTECTABLE 4-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 713C1 VS/PT 1.22E+05 26.9 28.4 24.5 67.93 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 2.61E+06 28.9 51.2 1.0 98.39 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 3.19E+06 29.6 46.4 18.8 98.65 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 714C3 WS 6.38E+06 32.0 38.7 23.6 99.27 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 6.27E+06 32.6 34.9 29.2 99.24 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 221C4 PT 34.2 39.7 24.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 209C3 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.04E+07 35.3 42.0 30.8 99.50 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 211C1 FF/S 2.55E+07 37.7 48.3 27.9 99.78 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 8.71E+06 39.3 101.1 4.0 99.34 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 221C5 PT 39.7 42.9 38.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 906C2 QT/PT 4.82E+06 44.1 64.4 16.0 98.67 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 806C1 C/VS 45.3 47.0 43.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 333C1 SD/FF 8.57E+06 48.6 59.1 33.7 99.17 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 806C2 C/VS 9.51E+02 52.2 72.7 33.1 -4147.19 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 210C2 FF/S 1.81E+07 54.1 62.8 45.0 99.56 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 2.17E+08 54.4 56.0 52.8 99.96 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 55.8 77.2 31.9 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 333C2 SD/FF 1.31E+07 59.0 83.0 20.1 99.35 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 332C1 WS 3.84E+07 64.8 86.1 36.3 99.75 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 714C2 WS 7.34E+06 70.3 81.4 63.7 98.61 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 714C1 WS 1.04E+07 70.4 76.3 67.0 99.01 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 725C1 WS/QT 75.2 95.1 65.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 2.58E+08 96.8 108.6 85.1 99.95 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 99.3 111.4 91.4 Out: No MTEC, Not MACTTot Cl INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.54E+08 102.0 126.4 78.1 99.90 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 4.04E+07 106.5 142.9 78.4 99.62 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 212C1 FF/S 3.31E+07 133.9 249.6 64.2 99.41 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 906C1 QT/PT 6.22E+07 134.3 143.7 117.3 99.69 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 714C5 WS 1.27E+07 135.6 212.2 94.2 98.44 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/M (714C4)Tot Cl INC 500C2 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.26E+07 139.3 343.2 2.2 98.39 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/M (500C4)Tot Cl INC 906C3 QT/PT 5.27E+07 159.4 179.6 126.7 99.56 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 229C4 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.86E+08 159.8 271.4 48.2 99.87 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 324C4 ? 163.2 668.6 2.9 Out: No MTEC, Unknown APCSTot Cl INC 704C1 NONE 9.45E+07 163.7 178.1 155.5 99.75 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTABLE 4-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 725C2 WS/QT 164.7 177.6 140.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 906C5 QT/PT 7.94E+07 188.3 205.1 172.0 99.65 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 324C3 ? 192.6 622.8 4.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 324C1 ? 200.9 550.4 7.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 704C2 NONE 1.14E+08 214.3 274.3 167.2 99.73 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 324C2 ? 215.1 560.2 7.8 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.96E+08 218.1 318.4 154.4 99.84 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 914C1 ? 1.77E+07 227.1 273.4 202.3 98.13 Out: Unknown APCSTot Cl INC 906C4 QT/PT 6.57E+07 252.7 344.8 175.5 99.44 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 703C1 WHB 5.41E+05 325.5 376.4 247.8 12.48 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 710C3 QT/OS/C/S 4.52E+07 346.8 353.9 341.5 98.88 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 710C1 QT/OS/C/S 6.52E+07 355.5 381.7 306.3 99.21 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 703C2 WHB 4.87E+05 378.1 445.2 260.7 -13.00 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 710C2 QT/OS/C/S 4.91E+07 439.6 483.1 382.8 98.70 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 784C1 NONE 1012.3 1061.3 963.5 Out: No MTEC, Not MACTTot Cl INC 784C2 NONE 1067.9 1119.8 974.5 Out: No MTEC, Not MACTTABLE 4-16. TOTAL CHLORINE, CEMENT KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl CK 204C2 ESP 1623198 0.1 0.1 0.1 99.99 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.6e6)Tot Cl CK 304C2 ESP 0.4 0.6 0.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 30141 FF 1173310 0.4 0.6 0.3 99.96 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 403C1 ESP 1600315 0.7 1.6 0.2 99.95 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 30151 FF 1173310 0.7 1.0 0.3 99.93 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 403C2 ESP 2145033 0.9 1.1 0.8 99.95 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 315C1 FF 474426 1.4 1.7 1.1 99.71 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 202C1 FF 300489 1.7 2.5 1.2 99.77 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 303C1 QC/FF 0 2.0 3.1 1.2 98.99 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 315C2 FF 390116 2.7 2.8 2.6 99.38 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 317C1 FF 123778 2.9 3.5 2.2 98.58 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 306C1 MC/FF 738535 2.9 3.9 2.3 99.46 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 405C1 ESP 1643118 3.2 4.0 2.6 99.81 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 317C2 FF 258946 3.7 5.6 2.2 99.11 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 208C1 ESP 425585 4.5 6.2 2.9 98.96 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 207C1 MC/ESP 736365 4.9 5.3 4.5 99.26 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 308C1 ESP 778873 5.6 6.3 4.4 99.19 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 320C1 FF 334170 5.9 9.2 3.9 98.08 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 317C3 FF 0 7.0 7.8 6.0 94.79 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 321C1 ESP 1123822 9.5 12.0 6.9 99.10 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 302C1 ESP 2187394 10.2 11.0 9.8 99.36 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 401C5 ESP 1858356 10.4 14.9 6.9 99.37 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 205C1 ESP 546972 16.6 20.2 13.5 96.05 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 200C1 FF 3238628 18.2 24.1 15.3 99.19 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 201C1 FF 3019743 20.1 24.9 16.6 99.04 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 402C1 ESP 2789198 21.6 41.9 6.7 99.05 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 402C4 ESP 2824189 22.0 31.7 14.2 99.07 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 316C2 FF 440198 22.2 25.0 20.5 96.03 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 322C1 ESP 3069875 22.6 27.5 18.4 98.96 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 319C2 ESP 27.1 29.2 25.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 305C3 ESP 472114 28.4 30.2 25.9 93.10 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 202C2 FF 853544 31.1 46.6 14.2 97.73 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 300C1 ESP 2214874 33.8 43.7 23.8 97.81 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 316C1 FF 695311 35.1 36.9 33.5 95.34 In: MACT EU (FC)TABLE 4-16. TOTAL CHLORINE, CEMENT KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl CK 309C1 MC/ESP 1025758 35.7 44.1 24.1 95.23 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 303C2 QC/FF 1257091 36.0 96.8 5.3 96.71 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 401C1 ESP 3673829 36.2 47.4 22.4 98.76 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 319C8 ESP 197381 42.4 42.4 42.4 84.36 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 319C7 ESP 42.5 53.5 31.4 Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 406C1 ESP 823050 42.8 121.9 4.6 96.41 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 318C2 ESP 50.6 62.5 42.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 319C4 ESP 51.1 57.2 39.3 Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 318C1 ESP 739756 51.3 63.9 41.7 91.71 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 404C2 ESP 2085052 56.8 66.5 49.6 96.89 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 309C2 MC/ESP 1003736 57.0 83.5 31.6 92.27 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 323C1 ESP 3649388 71.9 101.1 31.4 97.19 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 404C1 ESP 1646409 76.6 105.7 20.5 94.75 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 206C1 ESP 983390 81.2 148.2 15.1 89.09 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 203C1 ESP 1334596 117.2 128.7 96.4 87.29 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 335C1 ESP 644562 121.9 150.9 102.6 77.97 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 305C1 ESP 1237797 157.2 185.6 105.9 94.79 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 319C6 ESP 829955 220.8 227.2 220.0 61.27 In: MACT EU (FC)TABLE 4-17. TOTAL CHLORINE, LWAKs, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 7699496 13 15 11 99.75 Source already in MACT poolTot Cl LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 13945545 26 33 20 99.73 MACT source (VS w/ MTEC of 1.4e7)Tot Cl LWAK 224C1 FF 853320 29 83 2 95.12 Out: MB problemTot Cl LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 12158726 31 38 26 99.63 Source already in MACT poolTot Cl LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 3309746 42 95 22 98.17 Source already in MACT poolTot Cl LWAK 225C1 FF 838545 641 753 567 -10.55 Out: Not MACTTot Cl LWAK 314C1 FF 1539260 853 921 815 33.74 Out: Not MACTTot Cl LWAK 310C1 FF 765771 1199 1235 1160 -68.03 Out: Not MACTTot Cl LWAK 312C1 FF 1907626 1241 1342 1071 18.59 Out: Not MACTTot Cl LWAK 311C1 FF 901527 1258 1353 1185 -47.23 Out: Not MACTTot Cl LWAK 227C1 FF 676245 1347 1522 1000 -71.64 Out: Not MACTTot Cl LWAK 313C1 FF 2095927 1509 1573 1420 7.81 Out: Not MACTTot Cl LWAK 223C1 FF 2395327 2079 2317 1755 -25.75 Out: Not MACTTABLE 4-18. SUMMARY OF MACT FLOOR FOR NEW SOURCES(BASED ON STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF MACT EU)HAP Units Incinerators Cement Kilns LWA KilnsStnd Design Stnd Design Stnd DesignPCDD/PCDF TEQ ng/dscm 40 20 8 4.7 8 4.7Mercuryμg/dscm 130 58 82 58 72 36Semi Volatile Metalsμg/dscm 270 120 57 34 5.2 4Low Volatile Metalsμg/dscm 260 110 44 26 55 36Particulate Matter gr/dscf 0.039 0.017 0.065 0.032 0.054 0.025Total Chlorine ppmv 280 96 630 270 62 36CO ppmv 120 52 n/a n/a 270 120HC ppmv 12 6.1 m : 20* m : 10 14 6.5b : 6.7 b : 5.1or CO 100 or CO 100m : cement kiln main stackb : cement kiln bypass stack* : Based on current RCRA standard

# SECTION 5

BEYOND-THE-FLOOR CONTROL OPTIONS

Techniques for achieving beyond-the-floor (B-T-F) control levels are discussed, including factors affecting the applicability of different B-T-F control techniques to the different source categories, documented (or expected) control performance, and factors that affect performance. This discussion is intended to support the technical achievability of various B-T-F stack gas emissions levels that are described in the preamble to this proposed rule. All of the air pollution control technologies discussed are described in detail in the accompanying Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume I: Description of Source Categories

.

5.1 PCDD/PCDF

5.1.1 Incinerators

PCDD/PCDF can be controlled through both:

• Minimizing formation by conducting “good operating practices” such as maintaining combustion efficiency and controlling PM air pollution control device temperature, or using

PCDD/PCDF formation inhibitors.

• Using air pollution control equipment for either the destruction or removal of PCDD/PCDF with techniques such as carbon adsorption or catalytic oxidation.

5.1.1.1 Good Operating Practices

“Good operating practices” (GOP) involve flue gas PM control device temperature control (less than 400 ° F) to minimize the catalytic PCDD/PCDF formation process and good combustion practices to limit potential precursor trace organics formation (maintaining low CO and HC combustion gas levels). Many hazardous waste combustors, as well medical and municipal waste combustors, have demonstrated that TEQ levels of less than 0.5 ng/dscm can be achieved with the

use of GOPs.

5.1.1.2 Carbon Injection

Carbon injection has been demonstrated for the control of PCDD/PCDF, as well as heavy metals (mercury in particular) and other organics, on full-scale MWCs, MWIs, and one U.S. HWI to-date. The potential effectiveness of carbon injection depends on many factors, although maybe

5-1

# most importantly carbon injection rate, carbon type, and flue gas temperature at the point of injection or at the downstream carbon capturing PM air pollution control device. Additionally, using FFs for carbon capture may result in better performance compared with ESPs because FFs provide for more intimate contacting of the flue gas with the injected carbon. With a fabric filter, the flue gas is forced through the carbon-laden filter cake; whereas with an ESP, the flue gas flows between the particulate collection plates.

Carbon injection control for PCDD/PCDF on MWC, MWI, and HWIs is summarized in Table 5-1. PCDD/PCDF emissions levels less than 0.1 TEQ ng/dscm have been demonstrated on many MWC, MWI, and HWIs, with some as low as 0.004 TEQ ng/dscm, using carbon based control techniques. Capture efficiencies are almost always greater than 95%, with most greater than 99%. Additionally, for cases in which lower than 95% removal was achieved, stack gas outlet emissions levels were below 0.2 TEQ ng/dscm; thus the lower removal efficiencies may be due to the low levels already present in the flue gas, as well as sampling and analytical detection

limitations.

Carbon can be injected into existing “dry” air pollution control systems directly upstream of dry PM removal devices (e.g., FFs or ESPs), which operate above the flue gas saturation level. Injection of carbon can be performed in the duct or integrated into existing acid gas control spray dryer or dry injection chambers. The carbon is caught in the PM control device. However, the integration of carbon injection directly into existing “wet” air pollution control systems has not been demonstrated on any waste combustion facility. Potential options for the direct use of carbon in existing wet systems may include:

• Injection of carbon upstream of a wet scrubber, and subsequent capture in the scrubber. For effective control, this would require that the flue gas temperature at the point of injection be below 425 ° F (to avoid carbon fires), but above the saturation temperature. Flue gas moisture acts to saturate carbon and reduce its capture effectiveness. Thus, additional flue gas cooling systems may be required.

• Addition of carbon directly to the wet scrubbing solution. Performance when carbon is injected into a saturated gas is not know; it may not be effective due to plugging of the pores by moisture. Additionally, it may cause operational problems in certain types of scrubbers that use packing and gas distribution materials.

The more likely, and effective, methods for the use of carbon injection on existing wet systems include:

• Adding a dry PM collector to the wet system upstream of the existing wet scrubber. The dry PM collector would be used to capture the injected carbon. This may be preferable in cases where a waste heat boiler is being utilized since flue gas cooling to the dry PM APCD may already be taking place.

• Reheating the flue gas leaving the wet scrubber above the dew point, and using carbon beds discussed below, or carbon injection with a new dry PM collector as discussed above.

5-2

# 5.1.1.3 Carbon Bed

To-date, there have been limited full-scale applications of carbon beds to incineration units compared with carbon injection. These demonstrations have been confined to European incinerators; there has been no usage in the United States. Typically, well designed and operated carbon beds provide improved PCDD/PCDF control performance compared with carbon injection, with PCDD/PCDF control levels expected to be consistently greater than 99%, as shown in Table

5-2.

For existing dry PM and acid control systems, carbon beds can be placed directly downstream of the existing PM and acid gas control system. For wet systems, the carbon bed must placed downstream of the control system since if placed upstream, dirty flue gas containing PM and acid gases would quickly contaminate the bed. However, if placed downstream of a wet scrubber, flue gas reheat is required to increase the saturated flue gas temperature from the scrubber system to a temperature above the gas dewpoint. As discussed above for carbon injection, condensed moisture affects the carbon capture efficiency, thus the gas must be safely above the saturation temperature before entering the carbon bed.

5.1.1.4 Catalytic Oxidation

Catalytic oxidation techniques have also been demonstrated to control PCDD/PCDF (Fouhy, 1992; Hagenmaier et al., 1991; Ok et al., 1993; Hiraoka et al., 1990). Effective catalysts include those used for reducing NO
x 

# through the selective catalytic reduction technique. These catalysts are made of metals such as vanadium and tungsten oxides on a platinum oxide based substrate. The catalytic oxidation of PCDD/PCDF has been shown to occur in a temperature range

of about 480 to 660 ° F. PCDD/PCDF destruction efficiencies of from 95 to 98% have been demonstrated on full scale European MWCs, with controlled levels below 0.1 TEQ ng/dscm (Boos et al., 1992). The catalyst needs to be positioned where the flue gas has already been cleaned of metals, PM, and acid gases; these types of constituents will foul and contaminate the catalyst, leading to catalyst deactivation. Thus, catalysts are applied to dry APCSs downstream of the existing APCS; flue gas reheat may be required to boost the temperature to that required for effective catalytic control performance. For wet systems, because of the required application downstream of the scrubber system, flue gas reheat is mandatory.

5.1.1.5 Inhibitors

Certain compounds have been demonstrated to inhibit PCDD/PCDF formation. These include sulfur, ammonia, and other proprietary mixtures. The inhibitors may function as both a catalyst poison for the low temperature catalytic formation reaction, and also to eliminate PCDD/PCDF precursors that form prior to the catalytic temperature range. Demonstrations to date

include:

• Naikwadi and Karasek (1994) and Horler and Clements (1994) report that the use of a patented inhibitor formulation reduced PCDD/PCDF stack gas emissions on an MWC by

5-3

# 85%; the ultimate goal is to achieve a level of 0.1 ng/dscm.

• Full scale testing on an MWC has shown that the addition of sulfur containing coal to the waste stream acted to reduce PCDD/PCDF levels by 90% (Lindbauer et al., 1992).

• Studies on the co-combustion of coal with plastics and bark have shown very low PCDD/PCDF levels (below 0.1 ng/dscm) (Frankenhaeuser et al., 1993).

These inhibitors can be applied directly to the waste, or injected into the flue gas at appropriate

locations.

5.1.2 Cement Kilns

5.1.2.1 Carbon Injection

Although to-date, carbon injection has not been applied to full-scale cement kiln processes, performance discussed above for incinerators is assumed to apply cement kilns. There are two limitations of the direct application of carbon injection to cement kilns that must be considered:

• Treatment and disposal of used carbon. If the carbon is captured along with the cement kiln dust (CKD), the carbon/CKD mixture may not be suitable for recycle back into the kiln without treatment for carbon containing mercury and organics due to:

- Cement kiln internal cycle build-up of mercury (re-release and recapture of mercury).

- Recycle of CKD/carbon to the cold end of the kiln, as is typically done with CKD alone, may lead to increased HC emissions due to the addition of volatile organic

activated carbon.

The kiln may need to reduce or eliminate CKD recycle, thus increasing its solid waste generation. Additionally, the carbon/CKD mixture may be a hazardous waste due to its elevated mercury and organics content. Additional research is required to evaluate theleaching characteristics and devolatilization characteristics of a CKD and carbon-mercuryorganics mixture in order to determine the most appropriate carbon and CKD mixture disposal option.

The addition of a separate PM collector for injected carbon, downstream of the primary CKD collector may avoid many of these problems (at the added expense of a new PM collector). The captured carbon could then either be wasted or treated to remove mercury and either burned in the primary flame of the kiln or reused. CKD recycle would be

unaffected.

• For effective mercury control with activated carbon, the flue gas temperature needs to be

below 400 ° F (also to avoid carbon fires). Most hazardous waste burning cement kilns

5-4

# currently operate with an air pollution control system temperature above this level. However, Table 5-3 summarizes cement kilns that have demonstrated APCS operation at temperatures less than 400 ° F during trial burn compliance tests. This includes ESPs and FFs and wet and dry kiln arrangements. Note that the successful operation of FFs on wet kilns in the temperature range of 300 to 400 ° F is discussed in greater detail below in the beyond-the-floor discussion for PM control.

Additionally, Lafarge Fredonia, Medusa, and Ash Grove Foreman have modified their operation since the trial burn compliance tests to operate less than 400 ° F. CKs will likely need to operate at APCS temperatures less than 400 ° F to meet PCDD/PCDF B-T-F levels. Note that limited research has shown that going below 350 ° F provides little increase in carbon mercury capture efficiency; this may also be applicable to PCDD/PCDF. Also, going below 400 ° F for existing PM control devices that are currently operating above this level may lead to corrosion problems since the existing PM control is not designed for this temperature (it may have insufficient insulation, and dust handling problems may occur).

5.1.2.2 Carbon Beds

Carbon bed application and performance discussed above is also applicable to cement kilns. Note that carbon beds have not yet been applied to any full scale cement kilns, hazardous waste, or non-hazardous waste burning devices such as MWIs or MWCs in the United States.

5.1.2.3 Catalytic Oxidizers

Catalytic oxidizer application and performance discussed above for incinerators is also applicable to cement kilns. As mentioned, primary requirements are a flue gas temperature in the range of 400 to 600 ° F and a very clean flue gas to minimize catalyst fouling and deactivation.

5.1.2.4 Inhibitors

Inhibitor application and performance discussed above for incinerators may also be generally applicable to cement kilns.

5.1.2.5 APCD Temperature Control

Recent modifications of PM control device temperature below 400 ° F (e.g., Medusa, Lafarge, and Ash Grove hazardous waste burning cement kilns) have reduced levels to below 0.5 TEQ ng/dscm. The Ash Grove CK at Chanute KS was emitting at 1.7 TEQ ng/dscm with an APCD temperature of 425 ° F; a temperature reduction to 375 ° F reduced the PCDD/PCDF levels to less than 0.05 TEQ ng/dscm. At the Medusa CK plant, a PM APCD temperature reduction from

over 600 ° F to 400 ° F resulted in a reduction in PCDD/PCDF from over 3 TEQ ng/dscm to below 0.5 TEQ ng/dscm. The feasibility of low temperature operation, in particular FFs on wet type kilns, is discussed in detail in the following section of PM beyond-the-floor control.

5.1.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

5-5

# PCDD/PCDF control methods discussed above for cement kilns are also generally applicable to light weight aggregate kilns.

5.2 MERCURY

Mercury emission from all source categories of hazardous waste burners can be controlled by one or both of the following techniques:

• Feedrate control of mercury (in waste, supplemental fuels, or raw materials). Feedrate control performance, applicability, and feasibility is not discussed since for the achievability of B-T-F levels, it is not required.

• Mercury air pollution control devices such as carbon adsorption (with duct injection or carbon beds), sodium sulfide injection, selenium filters, or wet scrubbing. These control techniques are discussed in detail in the following.

5.2.1 Incinerators

5.2.1.1 Carbon Injection

Carbon injection, as discussed above for PCDD/PCDF control, is also effective at controlling mercury. On full-scale MWC, MWI, and HWI applications, with typical carbon injection rates of from 40 to 400 mg/dscm flue gas, mercury control efficiencies are greater than 80%, and are typically above 90%, with many greater than 95%, as shown in Table 5-4. Table 5- 5 summarizes carbon injection (and carbon bed) mercury control performance on all available combustion facilities (including European and U.S. applications). Individual run data is not given; instead ranges and/or test condition averages are provided. Figure 5-1 shows the effect of carbon injection feedrate on mercury control performance for all facilities listed in Table 5-4 with carbon injection feedrate (by test condition when available). Table 5-5 summarizes carbon injection control performance, by individual run, at three U.S. MWCs (Marion Co., Stainislaus Co., and Camden Co.) and two U.S. MWIs. Figures 5-2 through 5-4 summarize the effect of carbon injection rate on control performance at the Camden and Stainislaus facilities. Figure 5-5 summarizes control performance from the use of an activated carbon known as “Sorbalit” produced by Joy.

For improved mercury control performance with carbon injection, a combination of low injection temperature, high carbon injection rate, and specialized carbon (such as sulfur impregnated) may be required to achieve removal efficiencies consistently higher than 95%. Additionally, the injection of carbon in a dry form, as opposed to mixing it in with a spray drying solution, has been shown to provide improved mercury capture performance.

5.2.1.2 Carbon Beds

Carbon beds discussed above for PCDD/PCDF control are also effective at controlling

5-6

# mercury. Demonstrated mercury control levels can be typically greater than 99%.

5.2.1.3 Wet Scrubbers

Wet scrubbers have in some cases been shown to control mercury since certain forms of mercury (chlorinated salts in particular) are soluble in the wet scrubbing solution. However, mercury control efficiency is usually inconsistent and low in comparison to the use of the carbon adsorption techniques discussed above. Some mercury scrubbers rely on the reaction of mercury with chemicals such as sodium hypochlorite or with a chelating agent and cupric chloride, to form water-soluble species of mercury which can be removed in conventional wet scrubbers. 90-95% mercury removal has been demonstrated (Brna, 1991). Treatment of contaminated scrubber blowdown liquid is the primary problem.

5.2.1.4 Selenium Coated Filter

In selenium filters, mercury reacts with selenium to form HgSe on the filter surface. This method has been used in Europe on MWCs, and has demonstrated greater than 90% mercury control (Lindquist, 1991; Brna, 1991). Its primary limitation is that the flue gas must be kept

below 140 ° F for the filter to effectively remove mercury, which in most cases is very close to the flue gas saturation/condensation temperature. Additionally, the flue gas must be clean of PM to avoid filter blinding or poisoning, and disposal of the spent material

5.2.1.5 Sodium Sulfide Injection

Sodium sulfide is added directly to the spray dryer injection system. Mercury sulfide, a highly stable solid reaction product, is formed and collected in a PM control device. It has been demonstrated on MWCs in Europe, Canada, and one in the U.S. 50 to 90% mercury control efficiency has been achieved (White et al., 1991; Andersson and Weimer, 1991). Problems with its use include the potential release of hydrogen sulfide fumes from bags of sodium sulfide as they are opened, disposal of the secondary waste, and generation of mercury sulfide with is a fine particulate and difficult to capture.

5.2.2 Cement Kilns

In general, the same techniques for mercury control discussed above for incinerators apply as well to cement kilns, with the associated problems for carbon injection as discussed above for

PCDD/PCDF control.

5.2.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

In general the same techniques for mercury control discussed above for cement kilns applied as well to LWAKs.

5.3 PARTICULATE MATTER

5-7

# Beyond-the-floor particulate matter (PM) emissions levels are achieved through use of efficient PM air pollution control devices.

5.3.1 Incinerators

PM emissions from incinerators can be controlled with devices including wet scrubbers (venturi, and other novel types such as free-jet, collision, and ionizing types), fabric filters, and electrostatic precipitators (ESPs). Although certain wet scrubbing techniques such as high energy venturis and novel condensation, free-jet and collision scrubbers have been demonstrated to achieve low PM emissions levels (less than 0.005 gr/dscf), in general, fabric filters and ESPs provide superior PM control performance.

For well designed and operated fabric filters (air-to-cloth ratio less than 2 acfm/ft 2 

# ) with a typical woven fiber glass bag, emissions control levels below 0.010 gr/dscf are typical for HWI, MWC, and MWIs (Davis et al., 1990; EER, 1994). For improved fiber glass or nomex felt and tri-loft fabrics, less than 0.005 gr/dscf has been demonstrated. For high performance teflon membrane fabrics, levels below 0.0010 gr/dscf have been achieved. With the use of optimum fabric cleaning cycle, and regular bag replacement and maintenance schedule, these levels are

achievable on a continuous basis.

ESPs are not typically used on incinerators. However, well designed ESPs with specific collection areas greater than 500 ft 2 

# /kacfm, can routinely obtain levels less than 0.010 gr/dscf as demonstrated on HWI and MWCs. For state-of-the art equipment, levels less than 0.0050 are achievable (EER, 1994). Existing equipment retrofits such as modification of rapping cycle and frequency, addition of advanced power systems controls (e.g., intermittent energization or pulse energization techniques), modification of internal plate and electrode geometry to allow for high voltage potentials, flue gas conditioning (addition of water or reagents such as sulfur trioxide or ammonia to condition particulate matter for lower resistivity), improving gas distribution within ESP, and increasing plate size of ESP, have also been demonstrated to achieve levels less than 0.010 gr/dscf (EER, 1994).

For improved PM control from existing “wet” air pollution control systems, the addition of a wet ESP or ionizing wet scrubber (IWS) may be preferred because they could be added directly to the tail end of the existing control system train. Wet ESPs and multi-stage IWSs have demonstrated performance of less than 0.005 gr/dscf. The addition of a fabric filter or dry ESP to the back end of a wet system would require flue gas reheat due to the requirement of operation at temperature above the flue gas dewpoint. The preferred placement prior to the wet control device(s) may require additional flue gas cooling systems as well as facility modifications including equipment and ducting tear-out and replacement.

5.3.2 Cement Kilns

FFs and ESPs can be used for PM emissions control on both wet- and dry-process cement kilns. Wet kilns typically use ESPs; however, FFs can also be used. Wet kilns have historically not used FF for a variety of reasons. When wet-process kilns were first developed, fabrics

5-8

# suitable for relatively high temperature operation were not available. There is also concern about the high moisture content of wet kiln flue gas and high PM alkali and chloride content resulting in blinding and plugging of filter bags. Additionally, the high moisture content of wet kiln flue gases improves operation of ESPs primarily by reducing the resistivity of the collected PM.

However, high temperature fabrics are now readily available, and fabric filters have extensive experience in conjunction with spray dryers for acid gas control successfully operating at temperatures as low as 50 ° F above saturation conditions. Three wet process cement kilns in the U.S. currently use fabric filters: Dragon Cement in Thomaston ME, Giant Cement in Harleyville SC (burns hazardous wastes), and Holnam in Dundee MI. Discussions with these facilities indicate that the use of fabric filters on wet cement kilns is technically feasible; no operational
difficulties have been encountered at this time (Behan, 1994). It has been found that with fabric filters on wet cement kiln processes, the higher moisture actually reduces dust handling problems, and that the anticipated increased dust agglomeration forces would be expected to reduce dust penetration of the fabric thus resulting in a potential filtration efficiency improvement compared with operation on dry process kilns (EER, 1994).

Additionally note that these fabric filters on wet kilns all operate in the gas temperature range of 300 to 400 ° F, within the temperature range that is amenable to carbon injection if required, and is out of the catalytic PCDD/PCDF formation range (about 450 to 700 ° F as discussed in previous sections in more detail). Also note that the moisture content of wet kiln flue gas typically ranges from 30 to 40% by weight. The dewpoint (the flue gas temperature at which water vapor condensation would start to occur) of wet kiln flue gases conservatively ranges from 170 to 190 ° F, depending upon the exact moisture content, as well as other flue gas characteristics such as SO 3 

# content. A wet kiln fabric filter operating at 300 to 400 ° F would be at least 100 ° F above the saturation level. Implying the increased moisture content of wet kilns is not believed to pose a problem for operation of a fabric filter in the flue gas temperature range of 300 to 400 ° F, as has been demonstrated on the three operating wet kilns described above.

As shown in Section 3, FF performance on hazardous waste burning cement kilns, ranges from 0.07 to 0.0010 gr/dscf; however, more than half of the facilities have condition averages which are below the 0.015 level. As discussed above for incinerators, newly designed FF systems for cement kilns have been demonstrated to perform consistently below 0.005 gr/dscf, with some as low as 0.001 gr/dscf (using Goretex fabric). With retrofitting to modern fabrics (such as a heavy woven fiberglass), existing FFs should also be able to consistently achieve less than 0.0050 gr/dscf. Technology transfer from hazardous waste burning LWAKs and incinerators, as well as coal burning utility plants and MWC and MWIs would also indicate the feasibility of achieving a 0.015 gr/dscf level.

ESPs have been historically preferred to FFs in the cement kiln industry due to reliability and ease of operation and control and maintenance. Also, ESPs catch dust in stages allowing for the recycle of dust caught in the first few fields, and wasting of alkali-concentrated dust in the latter fields. Well designed and operated hazardous waste burning cement kiln ESPs have demonstrated to be capable of achieving levels less than 0.015 gr/dscf (5 different kilns), with some less than 0.005 gr/dscf (2 different kilns). With new ESPs, levels consistently less than 0.005 gr/dscf are

5-9

# readily achievable, while retrofit upgrades on existing ESPs (with techniques such as humidification, plate area increases, control system upgrades, etc.) may in many cases also be feasible for achieving a level of 0.015 gr/dscf, as discussed above for incinerators.

Additionally, a FF may also cost-effectively retrofitted onto an existing ESP housing for additional control of PM (Rowland et al., 1993). FF bags are added to the tail end of an existing ESP housing. The use of a Goretex fabric bag reduced the PM level to below 0.0020 gr/dscf. This technique has also been proposed by EPRI for PM control on coal fired boilers with existing ESPs (known as the “COHPAC” system) (Harrison et al., 1994). EPRI has demonstratedenhanced PM capture on the fabric due to electrically charged PM allowing for the use of high airto-cloth ratios (greater than 10 ft/min).

5.3.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

PM control techniques discussed above for cement kilns and incinerators directly apply to LWAKs. Note that FFs are currently used on all hazardous waste burning LWAKs. As discussed in Section 3, 60% of the LWAK condition averages are less than 0.007 gr/dscf, with about 30% less than 0.003 gr/dscf. However, ESPs or wet scrubbers could also be used if required.

5.4 LOW VOLATILE METALS

Particulate matter emissions control techniques discussed above are also directly appropriate for the control of LVM, as well as feedrate control of LVM in feedstreams.

5.5 SEMI VOLATILE METALS

Particulate matter emissions control techniques discussed above are also appropriate for the control of SVM emissions, since like LVM, typically some SVM is contained in entrained flue gas particulate matter. However, for SVM, which typically vaporize in the combustion chamber and recondense onto small sized particulate matter in the air pollution control device, technologies which are effective at capturing fine particulate matter (such as fabric filters) are typically the most

efficient for SVM control.

5.6 TOTAL CHLORINE

Beyond-the-floor total chlorine (HCl + Cl 2 

# ) emissions levels on hazardous waste burning
source categories can be accomplished by:

• Reduction of feed chlorine levels (in either waste, supplement fuels, or raw materials).

• Use of chlorine control systems such as wet and/or dry scrubbing systems.

5.6.1 Incinerators

Both wet and dry scrubbing systems can be used for control of chlorine emissions from

5-10

# HWIs. Wet scrubbing systems, which rely on absorption of acid gases in a liquid scrubbing solution, come in many different designs and types, including venturi scrubbers, free jet scrubbers, collision scrubbers, ionizing wet scrubbers, packed beds, tray types, and spray scrubbers. The packed-bed type typically provides the highest level of chlorine control due to effective liquid/gas contacting; although, venturi scrubbers, probably considered the poorest type for acid gas control, typically demonstrate greater than 90% control. Properly designed and operated packed bed wet scrubber systems on HWIs provide typically greater than 99.9% control and less than 25 ppmv outlet emissions levels, as discussed in Section 3. Ionizing wet scrubbers may even have greater performance. Wet scrubbers with alkaline caustic scrubber solution will provide both HCl and Cl 2 

# gas control since Cl 2 

# gas is absorbed in alkaline solutions (Cl 2 

# is
absorbed very poorly in neutral and basic solutions). The primary disadvantage of wet scrubbing compared with dry scrubbing is the generation of a secondary waste stream scrubber liquid blowdown that may require additional treatment and handling prior to final disposal.

Dry and semi-dry scrubbers are typically not as efficient as wet scrubbers for chlorine control. However, based on limited performance on HWIs, and comprehensive operation on MWIs, MWCs, and utility boilers, dry and semi-dry scrubbing systems can regularly achieve performance levels of greater than 90% control efficiency and less than 25 ppmv outlet emissions. In many cases, greater than 99% control efficiency has been demonstrated with dry scrubbing

systems.

5.6.2 Cement Kilns

Chlorine gases generated during hazardous waste combustion in cement kilns are controlled to a great degree due to the use of limestone which is a required element in the cement making process. In the kiln, limestone is converted to lime, creating a highly alkaline environment where chlorine is controlled in a similar manner to that in dry scrubbers (the cement kiln itself can be considered as a huge dry scrubber). Control efficiency of chlorine in cement kilns, as discussed in Section 3, is typically greater than 90% About 50% of cement kilns are already controlling HCl below 25 ppmv. Thus, traditionally, cement kilns have not required the use of add-on chlorine air pollution control devices.

Improvement in chlorine control efficiency, especially in dry process cement kilns, may possibly be achieved by injection of water into flue gas stream to increase flue gas moisture content (increased flue gas moisture leads to more efficient absorption of chlorine). Operation of the air pollution control device (FF or ESP) at lower temperature (closer to saturation) may also help chlorine retention. Current systems remove entrained raw material lime at temperatures in the 400

to 700 ° F range; lower temperature operation may provide for more efficient lime/chlorine reaction. The addition of supplemental dry scrubbing caustic (e.g., through duct injection) would not be expected to help to increase chlorine control since kiln raw material limestone is already in abundance. Although, injection of fine powder caustic may be more effective than the entrained coarse raw material limestone since it may allow for more efficient chlorine gas contact and

reaction.

In any case, if either modification of the kiln air pollution control operation or additional

5-11

# dry scrubbing is not effective at improving chlorine control, conventional wet scrubbers such as spray of tray-type scrubbers could also be used. There has been limited use of wet scrubbers on cement kilns to date; for example, the “Passmaquody” System which uses slurried cement kiln dust in a wet scrubber arrangement for acid gas control. There is no available data on effectiveness of this scrubber on HCl control, however the system has demonstrated very good control of SO 2 

# (Passmaquody, 1995). Potential problems with the application of wet scrubbers to cement kilns include scaling and cementitous build-up from CaS due to inefficient PM removal device operation and scrubber liquor blowdown treatment requirement difficulties due to highly soluble sulfates and chlorine and the removal of suspended and dissolved solids (Penta, 1994). However, wet scrubbers are used on lime kilns, which are similar in process functions to cement kilns.

5.6.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

Wet and dry scrubbing control techniques discussed for incinerators are also equally applicable to light weight aggregate kilns for chlorine control. Dry scrubbing is being used at some hazardous waste burning LWAKs (Solite Carolina and Florida facilities). Control efficiency and outlet Cl emissions levels are unclear due to conflicting trial burn results. However, performance similar to that on MWC, MWI, and HWIs would be expected (typically greater than 90% control). One potential problem with the application of dry scrubbing to LWAKs is the contamination of the LWAK dust caught in the primary PM control device (FF for all hazardous waste burning LWAKs) with the dry sorbent. This may affect the kilns ability to recycle captured dust back into the kiln or mix the dust in with the final light weight aggregate product, both practices which are current utilized with the captured dust. The addition of dry scrubbing may force the kiln to add a separate additional FF (like that for carbon) dedicated to capturing the dry sorbent (and possible carbon if necessary) or dispose of the mixed sorbent and fly ash in an acceptable manner (e.g.,
landfill).

A venturi scrubber (VS) is currently used at one hazardous waste burning LWAK (Norlite facility). It is located downstream of a FF; thus the VS’s function is to control acid gases and volatilized metals that pass through the FF. The VS has demonstrated HCl control efficiency of greater than 99% and outlet HCl emissions of 10 to 90 ppmv. No operational problems of applying wet scrubbing to LWAKs have been found. More efficient packed bed, tray type, or spray tower scrubbers have not been demonstrated. However, there are no apparent technical limitations as to why these could not be applied if increased removal efficiency is required.

5.7 HYDROCARBONS

5.7.1 Incinerators

Control of HC emissions from incinerators can be achieved through:

• Good combustion practices such as:

-- Provide adequate excess oxygen to combustion zone. Avoid overcharging the waste combustion chamber which may lead to incomplete combustion or organics

5-12

# and release of unburned material.

-- Provide thorough mixing between air, and waste, and supplemental fuel. Poor mixing may create conditions of insufficient residence time at temperature and cold or oxygen deficient regions.

-- Blend and homogenize wastes to avoid combustion spikes. Spikes and dips in feed compositions may create regions of cold and/or oxygen deficient gases.

• Use of afterburner or catalyst to burn-out incompletely combusted organics that escape the primary combustion zone.

5.7.2 Cement Kilns

5.7.2.1 Bypass Stack

Combustion modifications discussed above for incinerators (including maintaining adequate oxygen, residence time, and temperature levels) may act to reduce HC generated in the cement kiln supplemental fossil fuel and hazardous waste fuel firing locations. Bypass stack HC measurements are direct indicators of the quality and efficiency of fuel and waste combustion. Thus main flame burner modifications and upgrades, and operation at increased excess air levels should help reduce bypass stack HC levels.

5.7.2.2 Main Stack

Modification discussed above for bypass stack control may help reduce HC main stack gaslevels. However, cement kilns may have elevated HC main stack gas levels due to “countercurrent” kiln operation; organics contained in the raw materials desorb and volatilize at low temperatures, and are carried out un-burned with the counter-current flue gas. Thus, combustion modifications such as those described above may not be sufficient to adequately reduce HC stack gas levels. A variety of techniques may be used to reduce stack gas HC emissions levels that are related to raw materials organics devolatilization, including:

• Use of a precalciner without a preheater. A flash precalciner at the cold feed end of the kiln is used to achieve an exiting flue gas temperature that is high enough to burn out organics (greater than 1500 ° F). This technique has been demonstrated on two non hazardous waste burning cement kilns, with results of less than 1 ppm HC in the main stack gas (Wood, 1994). Disadvantages to the use of this technique include:

-- Large energy requirement penalty which is incurred for achieving a 1500 ° F flue gas temperature at the precalciner exit. About 75% additional heat input per unit of clinker output is required compared to a conventional arrangement. However, if some of the energy of the 1500 ° F flue gas is recovered in a boiler in the form of either useful process steam or electricity, this set-up may become more cost

effective.

5-13

# -- High cost (equipment, labor, and kiln down-time) for precalciner vessel and associated equipment required for retrofitting the precalciner into the existing kiln and air pollution control system.

• Use of a raw materials roaster/dryer. A separate thermal unit is used to drive off organics from the raw feed materials prior to introduction into the cement kiln system. The unit would have a flue gas emission stack independent from the primary cement kiln. The unit may still have HC emissions, however they would not have the potential to mix with chlorine in hazardous wastes and react to form chlorinated hydrocarbons. A dryer used at one kiln to reduce feed material moisture (from 5 to 1%) has HC emissions ranging from 13-340 ppmv depending on the feed shale kerogen content (Wood, 1994).

• Use of raw materials with low organics content. About 8% of hazardous waste burning cement kilns have HC levels below 5 ppmv. Thus it is possible to achieve this level with currently used raw materials. Organics in raw materials are believed to be primarily from the shale kerogen component and limestone, which has a porous structure allowing for organics deposits.

• Use of a thermal or catalytic afterburner. A thermal afterburner would require a large amount of auxiliary fuel to reheat the kiln exit flue gas to temperatures (greater than 1500 ° F) required for organics burnout. Also use of thermal afterburner may add problems of

increased NO
x 

# emissions and introduce systems engineering integration problems with
existing equipment. Catalytic afterburner would need to be positioned downstream of primary PM removal device due to catalyst fouling, thus would require substantial flue gas reheat from PM control device temperature of less than 400 ° F to the typical catalytic reaction temperature of 1000 ° F.

5.7.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

HC levels from LWAKs, like cement kilns, may potentially be related to combustion zone conditions as well as raw materials organics desorption. However, LWAK raw materials do not typically contain significant quantities of organics. Therefore, maintenance of adequate combustion conditions (excess air, temperature, mixing, and residence time) should provide adequate HC control for most LWAKs. Note that unlike cement kilns, LWAKs must operate at relatively high excess air levels to produce a high-quality product. If this is not effective, then techniques discussed above for cement kilns would also be applicable to LWAKs.

5.8 CARBON MONOXIDE

5.8.1 Incinerators

Techniques discussed above for HC control are equally applicable for the control of CO.

5.8.2 Cement Kilns

5-14

# 5.8.2.1 Bypass Stack

CO generated from combustion in cement kilns can be reduced by the above mentioned combustion modifications for HC control. By-pass stack CO levels are indicative, like HC, of the amount of combustion generated CO. Note that CKs (prior to air inleakage) are typically operated very close to stoichiometric fuel to ratio in order to maintain high kiln temperatures and to minimize fuel requirements; thus it may be disadvantageous for CKs to lower their CO levels if the majority of CO in the bypass is due to low excess air firing conditions.

5.8.2.2 Main Stack

Unlike HC, CO main stack gas levels in cement kilns may not be dominated by raw materials organics desorption at low temperature; instead due to the limestone calcination process and decomposition of CO 2 

# into CO due to elevated temperatures and moisture and metal catalysts
in the CK. Thus, for cement kilns, not all of the control techniques for HC may apply for CO control. Catalytic oxidizer or thermal afterburner may be required to reduce main stack CO levels.

5.8.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

CO emissions level from LWAKs are related to combustion zone quality. Thus, similar control procedures discussed above for HC are applicable to the control of CO.

5-15

#     



   

  

  

 

   

 

 

   

  

 

    



    

  



     



# 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Carbon Injection Rate (mg/dscm)

E E

E E

E E E E

E E E

E E

E

E E E

E E E

E E

E E E E

E E

E

E E

E E E

E E

E

E E E

E E

E

E E

E E

E E E

E

E

E E

E E E

1 10 100 1000 10000

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Carbon Injection Rate (mg/dscm)

Figure 5-1. Mercury control with carbon injection (summary of test conditions
shown in Table 5-4).TABLE 5-1. ACTIVATED CARBON INJECTION PCDD/PCDF PERFORMANCEVendor Facility Location APCD Injection Temp PCDD/PCDF** ReferenceType Rate* (°F) UC C CE(mg/dscm) (ng/dscm) (ng/dscm) (%)Deutche Babcock MWC Camden Co. SD/ESP 0 270 250 50 80.0 Kilgroe et al. (1993)360 250 5 98.0MWC Fall Recycling, PA SD/FF 3 [0.015] Petti et al. (1995)INTEREL MWI Bronx DI/FF > 0 250-300 [16] [0.016] 99.9 Politi et al. (1993)MWI Morristown SD/FF 0 285 [2-4] [0.4-2] 47.3 Hyland et al. (1993)[2.5] [1-4] [0.05] 90.0MWI Borgess (Facility A) DI/FF 0 310 237 132 44.3 Durkee and Eddinger (1992)134 411 16 96.1334 416 6 98.6MWI Facility M SD/FF 0 280 192 32 83.3 Durkee and Eddinger (1992)200 199 3.3 98.3HWI WTI (Liverpool, OH) SD/ESP 0 320 50-240 WTI (1993)> 0 8-23 [0.1]Dravo (Sorbalit) HWI Schoeiche/Berlin SD/FF > 0 320 [1.7] [0.02] 98.8 Blumbach and Nethe (1992)Dravo (Sorbalit) HWI Schweinfurt SD/FF > 0 [12] [0.085] 99.3 Blumbach and Nethe (1992)[6.79] [0.06] 99.1Joy/Niro HWI Sakab, Swe. SD/FF [0] 295 [21] [7.3] 65.0 Christiansen and Brown (1992)[0] [7] [2.2] 69.0[4.5] [2] [0.014] 99.3[7.5] [2.8] [0.027] 99.0[9] [6.1] [0.07] 98.9[9] [2.7] [0.06] 97.8[13] [1] [0.03] 97.0[13] [1.8] [0.02] 98.9Joy/Nitro HWI Biebesheim, Ger. SD/FF 0 248 [0.15] [< 0.03] > 80 Schoner (1992)50 [0.2] [< 0.03] > 80TABLE 5-1. ACTIVATED CARBON INJECTION PCDD/PCDF PERFORMANCEVendor Facility Location APCD Injection Temp PCDD/PCDF** ReferenceType Rate* (°F) UC C CE(mg/dscm) (ng/dscm) (ng/dscm) (%)500 [0.14] [< 0.03] > 805000 [0.12] [< 0.03] > 80Joy/Niro HWI Sakab, Swe. SD/FF [4] 300 [2.5] [0.06] 97.6 Feldt (1991)[4.5] [2.0] [0.003] 99.8[6] [1.4] [0.025] 98.2[7.5] [1.7] [0.004] 99.8[7.5] [3.3] [0.008] 99.8Lurgi HWI DI/FF 250-400 [9.3] [0.09] 99.0 Knoche et al. (1991)[1.9] [0.06] 97.0Joy/Niro MWC Zurich, Swit. SD/ESP 0 284 306 [7.7] 77 [1.9] 74.8 Brown and Felsvang (1991)18 223 [7.5] 33 [0.8] 85.20 248 277 [6.9] 69 [1.8] 75.159 455 [6] 5 [0.09] 98.9Joy/Niro MWC Amager SD/FF 0 284 132 [2.8] 2.1 [0.08] 98.4 Brown and Felsvang (1991)6 283 [4.8] 1.2 [0.008] 99.617 276 [8.3] 2.4 [0.05] 99.158 201 [4] 1.1 [0.035] 99.50 261 254 [7.7] 1.3 [0.005] 99.519 154 [5] 0.4 [0.002] 99.770 154 [4.5] 0.7 [0.002] 99.5Joy/Niro MWC Kassel SD/FF 0 275 380 [9.5] 151 [3.46] 60.0 Brown and Felsvang (1991)19 134 [3.21] 12 [0.19] 91.019 238 [5.1] 8 [0.15] 96.647 298 [5.5] 9 [0.13] 97.0105 359 [5.94] 7 [0.07] 98.1Procedair MWC Quebec City SD/FF 280 [0.06] Procedair (1994)Lurgi MWC DI/FF 250-450 [2.96] [0.068] 97.7 Knoche et al. (1991)TABLE 5-1. ACTIVATED CARBON INJECTION PCDD/PCDF PERFORMANCEVendor Facility Location APCD Injection Temp PCDD/PCDF** ReferenceType Rate* (°F) UC C CE(mg/dscm) (ng/dscm) (ng/dscm) (%)[2.37] [0.06] 96.6Lurgi MWC DI/FF 250-450 [8.12] [0.12] 96.5 Knoche et al. (1991)Lurgi MWC DI/FF 250-450 [3.26] [0.0105] 99.7 Knoche et al. (1991)[2.48] [0.009] 99.6Dravo (Sorbalit) MWC Geiselbullach DI/FF > 0 390 [2.2] [< 0.1] > 95 Nethe (1990)Dravo (Sorbalit) MWC Berlin-Ruhleben DI/FF > 0 300 2.5 99.2 Wilken and Beyer (1990)Dravo (Sorbalit) MWC Wurzburg DI/FF > 0 [9] [0.02] 99.6 Blumbach and Nethe (1992)[10.7] [0.06] 99.4Dravo (Sorbalit) MWC KWU Siemens DI/FF [0.2] [0.017] 92.0 Blumbach and Nethe (1992)Rheinische Kalkst. MWC Nordhein-Westfalen DI/FF > 0 [6] [0.011] 99.8 Morun and Schwarzkopf (1992)[4] [0.02]Teller MWI Skovde DI/FF [0] 276 5.7 2.5 56.1 Teller et al. (1990)[0.2] 21.3 0.2 99.1[2] 9.2 0.6 93.5Notes:C: Controlled emissions (measured downstream of carbon location) HWI: Hazardous waste incineratorCE: Control efficiency MWC: Municipal waste combustorDI : Dry injection MWI: Medical waste combustorESP :Electrostatic precipitator SD : Spray dryerFF: Fabric filter UC: Uncontrolled emissions (measured upstream of carbon location)*: Numbers in [ ] are given in lb/hr not mg/dscm**: Numbers in [ ] are given in TEQ not total PCDD/PCDFTABLE 5-2. ACTIVATED CARBON BED PCDD/PCDF PERFORMANCEVendor Facility Location APCD Injection Temp PCDD/PCDF** ReferenceType Rate* (°F) UC C CE(mg/dscm) (ng/dscm) (ng/dscm) (%)Lentjes MWC FB na 266 93 [2.5] 1.7 [0.03] 98.0 Kassebohm and Streng (1993)Steinmuller/Hugo MWC Hamburg-Stapelfield FB na 284 130 0.1 99.8 Shamekhi et al. (1990)Steinmuller/Hugo HWI Herten FB na 248 50 0.05 [0.001] 99.9 Hartenstein (1993)Steinmuller/Hugo Fligern FB na [0.02-0.06]SGP-VA HWI Vienna FB na 230 291 [4.3] 4 [0.05] 98.6 Clarke (1991)Lurgi CFB na [6] [0.01] 99.8 Knoche et al. (1991)Lurgi FB na 100 [3] 1.2 [0.025] 98.8 Knoche et al. (1991)Notes:C: Controlled emissions (measured downstream of carbon location) HWI: Hazardous waste incineratorCFB: Circulating fluid bed MWC: Municipal waste combustorCE: Control efficiency MWI: Medical waste combustorFB: Fixed bed UC: Uncontrolled emissions (measured upstream of carbon location)*: Numbers in [ ] are given in lb/hr not mg/dscm**: Numbers in [ ] are given in TEQ not total PCDD/PCDF

# TABLE 5-3. HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNING CEMENT KILNS

WITH APCD TEMPERATURES LESS THAN 400 ° F

EPA Facility Kiln APCD APCD ID No. Type Temp ( ° F)

406 Ash Grove Louisville D ESP 350 303 Lonestar Cape Girardeau D ESP 200-300 321 Lafarge Demopolis D ESP 240-270

405 Ash Grove Louisville D ESP 240-270

301 Essroc Dorado D FF 200-400

317 Southdown Kosmos D FF 220-320

315 Southdown Fairborn D FF 320-420 207/208 Keystone Bath W ESP 400

402 Ash Grove Chanute W ESP 280-480

401 Ash Grove Chanute W ESP 300-450

203 Holnam Artesia W ESP 350-420

404 Ash Grove Foreman W ESP 360-500

228 Ash Grove Foreman W ESP 380-500

D: Dry process kiln W: Wet process kilnTABLE 5-4. ACTIVATED CARBON MERCURY PERFORMANCELocation APCD Hg Control ReferenceControl (%)w/out AC w/ ACCamden, NJ MWC SD/ESP 400 40 90 Kilgroe et al. (1993)Marion, OR MWC SD/FF 690-900 36 90 Richman et al. (1993)Stainislaus, CA MWC SD/FF 1000 80 White et al. (1992)Fall Recycling, PA MWC SD/FF 400 93 Petti et al. (1994)NJ MWI SD/FF 2000 30 90 Blizard and Tidona (1992)Bronx, NY MWI DI/FF 16500 99.2 Politi et al. (1993)Burnaby, BC MWC DI/FF 300-430 92-96 Guest (1993)Biebesheim, Germany HWI SD/ESP 70 -15 80-90 Christiansen and Brown (1992)Hamburgh, Germany MWC Fixed bed (2-stage) 60-105 95 Shamekhi et al. (1990)Berlin, Germany HWI DI/FF 180-260 88-99 Blumbach and Nethe (1992)Wurzburg, Germany MWC Fluidized bed 350 93 Blumbach and Nethe (1992)Schweinfurt, Germany HWI SD/FF 40-765 80-94 Blumbach and Nethe (1992)Herten, Germany HWI Fixed bed (5-stage) 2000 99.9 Hartenstein (1992)Kassel, Germany MWC SD/FF 200-300 30 80 Brown and Felsvang (1991)Amager, Denmark MWC SD/FF 200-600 43 87 Brown and Felsvang (1991)Zurich, Switzerland MWC SD/ESP 400-540 30 80 Donnelly and Felsvang (1989)Sakab, Sweden HWI SD/FF 10-400 84-96 Christiansen and Brown (1992)Skovde, Sweden MWI DI/FF 300-11000 90-99.8 Gaige and Halil (1992)Coal Boiler SD/FF 5 96 > 99 Gleiser and Felsvang (1993)HWI SD/FF 3400-5400 99.9 Morun and Schwarzkopf (1992)MWC SD/FF 40-90 80 Morun and Schwarzkopf (1992)MWI DI/FF 6600 0 96 Durkee and Eddinger (1992)AC: Activated carbon HWI: Hazardous waste incineratorAPCD: Air pollution control device MWC: Municipal solid waste incineratorDI: Dry injection MWI: Medical waste incineratorESP: Electrostatic precipitator SD: Spray dryerFF: Fabric filterInletConc(μg/dscm)FacilityType

# TABLE 5-5. SUMMARY OF CARBON INJECTION PERFORMANCE FOR MERCURY CONTROL ON MWC AND MWIS (BY INDIVIDUAL RUN)

Facility Cond. Carbon APCD Carbon Descr. Hg Hg Cntrl. No. Type Temp Feedrate Inlet Outlet Eff.
( ° F) (mg/dscm) ( μ g/dscm) ( μ g/dscm) (%)

Marion Co. MWC 1 AC 300 51 424 56 86.8

Marion Co. MWC 1 AC 300 51 403 81 79.9

Marion Co. MWC 1 AC 300 51 551 126 77.1

Marion Co. MWC 1 AC 300 51 495 69 86.1

Marion Co. MWC 1 AC 300 51 2853 131 95.4

Marion Co. MWC 1 AC 300 51 741 140 81.1

Marion Co. MWC 1 AC 300 51 785 186 76.3

Marion Co. MWC 1 AC 300 51 621 119 80.8

Marion Co. MWC 1 AC 300 51 697 134 80.8

Marion Co. MWC 1 AC 300 51 1888 114 94.0

Marion Co. MWC 1 AC 300 51 2548 147 94.2

Marion Co. MWC 2 AC 300 102 1013 130 87.2

Marion Co. MWC 2 AC 300 102 967 108 88.8

Marion Co. MWC 2 AC 300 102 1625 127 92.2

Marion Co. MWC 2 AC 300 102 1762 154 91.3

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 405 50 87.7

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 480 100 79.2

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 330 102 69.1

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 392 38 90.3

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 362 38 89.5

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 392 58 85.2

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 715 68 90.5

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 2700 57 97.9

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 550 54 90.2

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 530 27 94.9

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 470 24 94.9

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 1360 17 98.8

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads A 300 102 936 32 96.6

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads B 300 102 1246 130 89.6

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads B 300 102 2695 460 82.9

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads B 300 102 615 80 87.0

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads B 300 102 934 98 89.5

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads B 300 102 117 10 91.5

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads B 300 102 508 97 80.9

Marion Co. MWC 3 Ads B 300 102 560 38 93.2

Stainislaus Co. MWC 1 Coal 280 18 Econ. out. 568 157 72.4

Stainislaus Co. MWC 1 Coal 280 18 Econ. out. 434 139 68.0

Stainislaus Co. MWC 1 Coal 280 18 Econ. out. 501 77 84.6

Stainislaus Co. MWC 2 Coal 280 72 Econ. out. 556 68 87.8

Stainislaus Co. MWC 2 Coal 280 72 Econ. out. 641 71 88.9

Stainislaus Co. MWC 2 Coal 280 72 Econ. out. 498 41 91.8

Stainislaus Co. MWC 6 Coal 280 72 SD in. 973 17 98.3

Stainislaus Co. MWC 6 Coal 280 72 SD in. 744 65 91.3

# TABLE 5-5. SUMMARY OF CARBON INJECTION PERFORMANCE FOR MERCURY CONTROL ON MWC AND MWIS (BY INDIVIDUAL RUN)

Facility Cond. Carbon APCD Carbon Descr. Hg Hg Cntrl. No. Type Temp Feedrate Inlet Outlet Eff.
( ° F) (mg/dscm) ( μ g/dscm) ( μ g/dscm) (%)

Stainislaus Co. MWC 7 Coal 290 18 SD in. 342 178 48.0

Stainislaus Co. MWC 7 Coal 290 18 SD in. 437 191 56.3

Stainislaus Co. MWC 8 Coal 280 36 SD in. 507 132 74.0

Stainislaus Co. MWC 8 Coal 280 36 SD in. 333 92 72.4

Stainislaus Co. MWC 8 Coal 280 36 SD in. 478 38 92.1 Stainislaus Co. MWC 9 Lignite 275 18 SD in. 553 132 76.1 Stainislaus Co. MWC 9 Lignite 275 18 SD in. 564 61 89.2 Stainislaus Co. MWC 9 Lignite 275 18 SD in. 615 100 83.7 Stainislaus Co. MWC 10 Lignite 290 72 SD in. 1140 55 95.2 Stainislaus Co. MWC 10 Lignite 290 72 SD in. 568 34 94.0 Stainislaus Co. MWC 10 Lignite 290 72 SD in. 649 37 94.3 Stainislaus Co. MWC 10 Lignite 290 72 SD in. 786 42 94.7

Stainislaus Co. MWC 11 Coal 280 18 SD in. 571 151 73.6

Stainislaus Co. MWC 11 Coal 280 18 SD in. 489 143 70.8

Stainislaus Co. MWC 11 Coal 280 18 SD in. 694 372 46.4

Stainislaus Co. MWC 12 Coal 290 18 SD in. 1276 528 58.6

Stainislaus Co. MWC 12 Coal 290 18 SD in. 456 80 82.5

Stainislaus Co. MWC 12 Coal 290 18 SD in. 303 193 36.3

Stainislaus Co. MWC 13 Wood 280 18 SD in. 690 201 70.9

Stainislaus Co. MWC 13 Wood 280 18 SD in. 769 260 66.2

Stainislaus Co. MWC 14 Wood 280 36 SD in. 369 74 79.9

Stainislaus Co. MWC 14 Wood 280 36 SD in. 447 90 79.9

Stainislaus Co. MWC 14 Wood 280 36 SD in. 1250 246 80.3 Stainislaus Co. MWC 15 Coal 280 72 Lime slurry 456 77 83.1 Stainislaus Co. MWC 15 Coal 280 72 Lime slurry 464 29 93.8 Stainislaus Co. MWC 15 Coal 280 72 Lime slurry 460 53 88.5 Stainislaus Co. MWC 16 Coal 280 72 Lime slurry 560 19 96.6 Stainislaus Co. MWC 16 Coal 280 72 Lime slurry 452 53 88.3 Stainislaus Co. MWC 16 Coal 280 72 Lime slurry 397 21 94.7 Camden Co. MWC B2 FGD 270 75 Dry 972 296 69.5 Camden Co. MWC B2 FGD 270 75 Dry 593 63 89.4 Camden Co. MWC B2 FGD 270 75 Dry 835 149 82.2 Camden Co. MWC B3 PC-100 270 83 Dry 593 134 77.4 Camden Co. MWC B3 PC-100 270 83 Dry 639 29 95.5 Camden Co. MWC B3 PC-100 270 83 Dry 586 102 82.6 Camden Co. MWC B4 PC-100 280 450 Dry 491 21 95.7 Camden Co. MWC B4 PC-100 280 450 Dry 440 14 96.8 Camden Co. MWC B4 PC-100 280 450 Dry 512 17 96.7 Camden Co. MWC B5 FGD 270 440 Dry 680 9 98.7 Camden Co. MWC B5 FGD 270 440 Dry 820 13 98.4 Camden Co. MWC B5 FGD 270 440 Dry 644 12 98.1 Camden Co. MWC B7 FGD 350 320 Dry 964 107 88.9 Camden Co. MWC B7 FGD 350 320 Dry 506 22 95.7

# TABLE 5-5. SUMMARY OF CARBON INJECTION PERFORMANCE FOR MERCURY CONTROL ON MWC AND MWIS (BY INDIVIDUAL RUN)

Facility Cond. Carbon APCD Carbon Descr. Hg Hg Cntrl. No. Type Temp Feedrate Inlet Outlet Eff.
( ° F) (mg/dscm) ( μ g/dscm) ( μ g/dscm) (%)

Camden Co. MWC B7 FGD 350 320 Dry 778 59 92.4 Camden Co. MWC B8 FGD 264 171 Dry 545 40 92.7 Camden Co. MWC B8 FGD 264 171 Dry 455 23 94.9 Camden Co. MWC B8 FGD 264 171 Dry 525 24 95.4 Camden Co. MWC B9 FGD 266 40 Dry 485 78 83.9 Camden Co. MWC B9 FGD 266 40 Dry 957 82 91.4 Camden Co. MWC B9 FGD 266 40 Dry 463 73 84.2 Camden Co. MWC B11 FGD 271 362 Dry 626 20 96.8 Camden Co. MWC B11 FGD 271 362 Dry 635 16 97.5 Camden Co. MWC B11 FGD 271 362 Dry 664 16 97.6 Camden Co. MWC B12 FGD 271 328 Slurry 299 50 83.3 Camden Co. MWC B12 FGD 271 328 Slurry 521 77 85.2 Camden Co. MWC B12 FGD 271 328 Slurry 300 69 77.0 Camden Co. MWC B13 FGD 264 192 Slurry 382 78 79.6 Camden Co. MWC B13 FGD 264 192 Slurry 377 81 78.5 Camden Co. MWC B13 FGD 264 192 Slurry 974 158 83.8 Camden Co. MWC A2 FGD 265 344 Slurry 302 55 81.8 Camden Co. MWC A2 FGD 265 344 Slurry 403 78 80.6 Camden Co. MWC A2 FGD 265 344 Slurry 1412 261 81.5 Camden Co. MWC A3 FGD 278 381 Slurry 530 43 91.9 Camden Co. MWC A3 FGD 278 381 Slurry 458 108 76.4 Camden Co. MWC A3 FGD 278 381 Slurry 690 156 77.4 Camden Co. MWC A4 FGD 284 417 Slurry 643 49 92.4 Camden Co. MWC A4 FGD 284 417 Slurry 816 90 89.0 Camden Co. MWC A5 FGD 283 266 Slurry 335 40 88.1 Camden Co. MWC A5 FGD 283 266 Slurry 294 51 82.7 Camden Co. MWC A5 FGD 283 266 Slurry 364 52 85.7

Morristown MWI 1 2.6 lb/hr DSI/FF 664 516 22.3

Morristown MWI 1 2.6 lb/hr DSI/FF 2240 159.0 92.9

Morristown MWI 1 2.6 lb/hr DSI/FF 3070 332.0 89.2 Borgess MWI 1 ? SD/FF 5750 690 88.0 Borgess MWI 1 ? SD/FF 8180 983 88.0 Borgess MWI 1 ? SD/FF 9190 490 94.7 Borgess MWI 1 ? SD/FF 7370 103 98.6 Borgess MWI 1 ? SD/FF 13200 307 97.7

# SECTION 6

FLOOR ACHIEVABILITY

6.1 SIMULTANEOUS ACHIEVABILITY

As shown in greater detail in the Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume V: Engineering Costs , 6 out of the 80 existing incinerators in the database currently meet the MACT 6% floor for all HAPs, based on the trial burn stack gas emissions data. For cement kilns, 5 out of 45 simultaneously meet the 6% floors, while 3 out of 12 light weight aggregate kilns simultaneously meet the 6% floors. For the remaining facilities, the following generic add-on control systems with the appropriate MTEC limitations, based on the definition of MACT control in Section 3, may be used for simultaneously achieving the different HAP MACT floors.

6.1.1 Incinerators

Two types of air pollution control systems (both of which are currently used on many of
the hazardous waste incinerators) can be used to meet the floor for all HAPs:

• Hybrid wet/dry system -- This type of system uses flue gas cooling to below 400 ° F to avoid PCDD/PCDF formation (but remaining above the saturation temperature), followed by primary PM, LVM, and SVM removal in a fabric filter. Wet scrubbing (including additional gas cooling to below saturation) follows for acid gas (HCl/Cl 2 

# ) control.

• Wet system -- This type of system uses flue gas quenching to saturation conditions followed by primary PM, LVM, and SVM control in wet ESPs or high efficiency wet scrubbers. A packed bed scrubber is used if additional acid gas control is required. An alternative to this would be the use of quench followed by multiple stages of ionizing wet scrubbing (IWSs use a combination of electrostatic precipitation for efficient removal of PM and packed beds for highly efficient removal of acid gases).

Both of these system types are subject to the following MACT hazardous waste feedrate MTEC

limitations:

• Hg -- 51 μ g/dscm

• SVM -- 4.9x10 4 

# μ g/dscm

• LVM -- 6.2x10 3 

# μ g/dscm

• Chlorine -- 1.7x10 7 

# μ g/dscm

6-1

# For operation with higher feedrate MTEC levels, additional beyond-the-floor control techniques may be required (e.g., for mercury control the use of carbon adsorption techniques, for LVM control the use of fabric filter with high performance fabrics such as Goretex).

6.1.2 Cement Kilns

To meet the MACT floor level for all HAPs, an air pollution control system with the following characteristics is required (based on the definition of MACT control in Section 3): fabric

filter with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than 2 acfm/ft 2 

# with operation below 400 ° F (to limit PCDD/PCDF formation), in conjunction with the following hazardous waste feedrate control

MTEC limitations:

• Hg -- 28 μ g/dscm

• SVM -- 8.4x10 4 

# μ g/dscm

• LVM -- 1.4x10 5 

# μ g/dscm

• Chlorine -- 1.6x10 6 

# μ g/dscm

As discussed for incinerators, for operation with higher feedrate MTEC levels, additional beyondthe-floor control techniques may be required (e.g., for mercury control the use of carbon adsorption techniques, for LVM control the use of fabric filter with high performance fabrics such as Goretex).

6.1.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

To meet the MACT floor level for all HAPs, an air pollution control system with the following characteristics is required: fabric filter with an air-to-cloth ratio of less than 1.5 acfm/ft 2 

# with operation below 400 ° F, with the following hazardous waste feedrate MTEC limitations:

• Hg -- 17 μ g/dscm

• SVM -- 2.7x10 5 

# μ g/dscm

• LVM -- 4.6x10 4 

# μ g/dscm

• Chlorine -- 1.6x10 6 

# (or 1.4x10 7 

# if using a wet scrubber)

The fabric filter design parameters correspond to the most stringent MACT design for PM, SVM, and LVM control. It is assumed that the chlorine floor can be met without any add-on control if the chlorine feedrate MTEC is kept below 6.6x10 6



# .

Again, as for incinerators and CKs, for the use of higher feedrate MTEC levels, additional beyond-the-floor control techniques may be required (e.g., for mercury control the use of carbon adsorption techniques, for LVM control the use of fabric filter with high performance fabrics such as Goretex, for chlorine control the use of wet or dry scrubbing techniques).

6.2 CONSIDERATION OF THE EFFECT OF FEEDSTREAMS OTHER THAN

HAZARDOUS WASTE

6-2

# The use of MACT control, summarized above and described in Section 3, may not be sufficient to enable all cement or light-weight aggregate kilns to achieve the floor levels for HAPs where hazardous waste feedrate (MTEC) is part of MACT control (i.e., Hg, SVM, LVM,

HCl/Cl 2 

# ). This is due to two reasons.

• Hazardous waste as well as other feedstreams (e.g., raw materials, fossil fuels) contribute to emissions of HAPs for these sources. Given that the procedure for identifying the

MACT floor levels accounts for the contribution from hazardous waste and other feedstreams only for sources in the expanded universe (i.e., sources using MACT control), sources outside the EU with higher non-hazardous waste feedstream contributions of HAPs may not be able to achieve the floor levels using floor controls.

• Certain facilities use the MACT control equipment (i.e., FF, ESP, VS, etc.) but have higher MTEC than the MACT pool facilities; these facilities were not included in the MACT expanded universe and were not used to set the MACT floor. If these facilities do not achieve equivalent or better system removal efficiencies (SRE) than those in the MACT pool with the highest MTECs, then projection of these non-MACT EU facilities emissions based on MTEC feedrate may not be below the highest emitter in the MACT EU. This is

described in more detail below.

To identify kilns that may not be able to meet the floor levels using floor controls (and to identify (higher) levels that such kilns could achieve using floor controls), the following analysis is

used:

• It is assumed that there is a direct relationship between the feedstream feedrate of the HAPs influenced by feedrate control (metals and chlorine) and the corresponding stack gas emissions levels. For each HAP, the feedrate fractions that are contained in each of the different feedstreams (raw materials, hazardous waste, and supplemental fossil fuels) are used to proportion the total stack gas emissions into levels that are attributable to each of the feedstreams (e.g., if the raw materials chlorine feedrate contributed 30% to the total feedrate of chlorine, then 30% of the total chlorine stack gas emissions is estimated attributable to the raw materials).

• For facility conditions using MACT control (i.e., those in the MACT pool and expanded universe), stack gas emissions levels are proportioned by the individual feedstream fractions of each HAP, as discussed above. Note that these conditions by definition are currently meeting the MACT floor since they are directly considered in its determination.

• For facilities not using MACT, the following adjustment procedures are used to estimate emissions from the facility assuming it were to adopt MACT control procedures.

-- Hazardous waste feedrate MTEC higher than the MACT-defining level -- When the hazardous waste MTEC is higher than the MACT defining level, the stack gas emissions level that is attributable to the hazardous waste is adjusted to the MACT

6-3

# defining hazardous waste MTEC maximum level, again using the assumption of a direct relationship between feedrate and stack gas emissions levels. For example, consider the case where the hazardous waste MACT-defining MTEC level is 2, and
the source condition has an MTEC level of 4; the emissions concentration that is attributable to the hazardous waste would be reduced by 50%.

-- Facility does not utilize MACT add-on air pollution control device -- Stack gas emission levels are estimated if the facility does not use the MACT defining add-on control technology (e.g., estimates would be made for cement kilns for SVMs which use ESPs since FF is the MACT add-on control device). The estimated emissions level is determined as the feedrate MTEC multiplied by the penetration (one minus the SRE) demonstrated by facilities using the MACT add-on control technology. Note that the feedrate MTECs are adjusted to the MACT defining hazardous waste allowable levels when required like discussed above. The MACT

SRE that is used is determined from the SREs from all facilities in the source category universe utilizing the MACT add-on control technology. System penetrations (one minus the SRE) are shown as a function of the MTEC feedrate level for the MACT pool and EU facilities for SVM and LVM from CKs and LWAKs in Figures 6-9 through 6-12. For conditions with MTECs above the MACT defining level, the SRE of the source in the MACT EU with the highest MTEC is used for the emissions projection; for conditions with MTECs below the MACT level, the SRE of the MACT EU facility with the closest and higher MTEC is used. For mercury and chlorine, which for the most part are not controlled by any add-on flue gas MACT control equipment, SRE plots are not required (note that one LWAK uses a wet venturi scrubber). Note that the projected emissions levels are only considered when they are lower than the actual emissions level (i.e., the use of improved MACT add-on control technology must result in reduced emissions levels compared with the actual levels using non-MACT control).

When the hazardous waste fuel is reduced based on MACT MTEC limiting requirements, additional supplemental conventional fuel must be fired to make up for the energy content lost when reducing the hazardous waste feed. Assuming that the hazardous waste and conventional fuels have similar energy content, a one-to-one replacement is assumed. The emissions levels related to the use of the substituted conventional fuels are estimated based on the HAP composition of the supplemental conventional fuel, and added to the total stack gas emissions level.

The resulting projected and adjusted emissions levels for all test conditions are shown in “bar charts” in Figures 6-1 through 6-4 for cement kilns (Hg, SVM, LVM, and total chlorine, respectively) and in Figures 6-5 through 6-8 for LWAKs (Hg, SVM, LVM, and total chlorine respectively). They show, for each condition in the entire universe, stack gas emissions levels and proportions attributable to the different feedstreams (hazardous waste fuels, raw materials, primary conventional fuels, and supplemental conventional fuels). The group on the left part of the charts include those facilities in the MACT pool and EU which use MACT control and thus for which no adjustments are required. The facilities in the right group are non-MACT sources. They do not use MACT control, and thus require adjustments as described above. The type of adjustment that

6-4

# is used for each of the source conditions is shown along the x-axis: “MP” signifies that an adjusted MTEC level was used, “TP” signifies that an estimate based on the use of MACT add-on control equipment was made.

For cement kilns, comparison of the actual or projected stack gas emission levels with the 6% MACT floor design levels for existing sources leads to the following conclusions:

• For mercury, all but one of the sources have actual or projected stack gas emissions levels that are lower than the floor design level of 81 μ g/dscm. One facility (source condition 306) has mercury emissions attributable to raw materials at a level of almost 400 μ g/dscm. For this source, mercury was detected in the raw materials at a level of 0.7 mg/kg. There was no apparent spiking of the raw materials with mercury. This facility appears to have unusually high levels of mercury in the raw materials compared with the other kilns. Recent conversion with this facility has indicated that the normal day-to-day operating mercury feedrates are in fact much lower (by an order or magnitude) than that reported in the trial burn report.

• For SVMs, all but four of the sources have actual or projected stack gas emissions levels below the floor design level of 34 μ g/dscm. Two of these four facilities (sources 202 and 201, emitting at 60 and 450 μ g/dscm respectively) are believed to use the appropriate MACT add-on control equipment of FF, but are not included in the MACT expanded universe since they have MTECs higher than the MACT defining limit. Thus, technology projection for these conditions is not appropriate. The adjustment based on a reduction in

hazardous waste feedrate is not sufficient to lower the emissions levels to the MACT floor design level because these two facilities are operating with system removal efficiencies that are lower than those demonstrated by the MACT pool and expanded universe facilities. For example, source 201C1 has an actual emission level of 900 μ g/dscm with an MTEC about twice as high as the MACT defining level. The resulting MTEC projection to about

450 μ g/dscm is higher than the MACT floor design level; the MACT level is based on MACT pool and EU sources which demonstrated much higher SREs in comparison to source 201C1. Additionally, two other facilities (sources 406 and 309), which require both technology and feedrate MTEC projections, are estimated to emit at levels slightly higher than the floor (36 and 38 compared with the floor level of 34 μ g/dscm) due to raw

materials contributions.

• For LVMs, all sources have actual or projected emissions levels that are lower than the floor design level of 67 μ g/dscm.

• For total chlorine, all sources have actual or projected emissions levels that are below 75 ppmv, which is significantly below the floor design level of 270 ppmv.

For light weight aggregate kilns, comparison of actual or projected stack gas emission levels with the 6% MACT floor design levels for existing sources includes:

• For mercury, all sources have actual or projected emissions levels below the MACT design

6-5

# floor level of 36 μ g/dscm.

• For SVMs, three of the sources have actual or projected emissions levels that are above the MACT floor design standard of 7.5 μ g/dscm. Source 301 has an emissions level of 10

μ g/dscm, which is slightly higher than the design standard; this is due to raw materials contributions that are higher than those in the MACT pool and EU. Sources 313 and 314 have projected levels of 300 and almost 700 μ g/dscm respectively. For these sources, contributions from both hazardous waste as well as raw materials are responsible for the emissions being higher than the MACT floor design level. These sources are believed to use the MACT add-on control equipment (FF with the appropriate design considerations), but are not included in the MACT EU due to the use of SVM feedrates higher than the MACT defining limit. Emissions projections based on hazardous waste feed reductions are not sufficient to bring the facilities to the MACT floor since their SREs are lower in comparison with those in the MACT pool and EU.

• For LVMs, all except one source has actual or projected emissions levels that are below the MACT design level of 230 μ g/dscm. Source 313 has a level of about 240 μ g/dscm, which is slightly higher than the floor level. This is due to raw materials contributions that are slightly higher than those in the MACT pool and EU.

• For total chlorine, a couple of sources have estimated emission levels that are attributable to raw materials ranging from 200 to almost 600 ppmv. These levels are suspect since they are on the same order of chlorine levels that are typically generated from the combustion of materials such as municipal and medical waste, which might be expected to have higher concentrations of chlorine compared with LWAK raw materials. In any case, all actual or projected emissions levels are below the total chlorine MACT floor design level of 1,400

ppmv.

Thus, for both cement and light weight aggregate kilns for HAPs with emissions levels related to feedrate control, the use of floor control measures is estimated to be sufficient for most of existing facilities to meet the MACT floor design level without the additional control of HAPs from

feedstreams other than the hazardous waste. Raw materials and conventional fuels are not predicted to be a problem for compliance with any of the MACT floors. The primary concern is the achievability of the CK and LWAK SVM floor standards. For SVM for both CK and LWAKs, feedrate MTEC projections based on the MACT defining MTEC were not sufficient in a couple of cases to reduce emissions levels below the floor from facilities that appear to be using MACT add-on control equipment.

6-6MEC : Uses MACT, NMEC : Does not use MACTTP : Adjusted based on control technology, MP : Adjusted based on MTEC levelBL : Baseline, ND : Contribution of raw material to feed was below detection level 

# ND, MEC, 404C1

ND, MEC, 203C1

ND, MEC, 207C1

ND, MEC, 206C1

ND, MEC, 204C1

ND, MEC, 208C1

ND, MEC, 202C2

ND, MEC, 205C1

ND, MEC, 304C1

ND, MEC, 319C1

ND, NMEC-MP, 335C1

ND, NMEC-MP, 406C1

BL, NMEC, 303C1

ND, NMEC-MP, 405C1

NMEC-MP, 305C1

ND, NMEC-MP, 401C1

ND, NMEC-MP, 402C1

ND, NMEC-MP, 401C5

NMEC-MP, 309C1

NMEC-MP, 402C4

ND, NMEC-MP, 301C2

NMEC-MP, 303C3

NMEC-MP, 306C1050100150200250300350400450 

# Mercury Emissions ( μ g/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Raw MaterialFuelWasteSubst FuelFigure 6-1. Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, Mercury, Cement Kilns, 6% Floor Analysis.Non MACT 

# MEC, 320C1 MEC, 316C2 MEC, 316C1 BL, MEC, 303C1 MEC, 306C1 MEC, 317C1 BL, MEC, 317C3 MEC, 317C2 MEC, 303C3

NMEC-MP, 321C1 ND, NMEC-TP, 208C2 ND, NMEC-TP, 319C1 NMEC-MP, 315C2 ND, NMEC-TP, 200C1 NMEC-MP, 315C1 NMEC-TP, 208C1 ND, NMEC, 301C2 NMEC-TP, 402C4 NMEC-TP, 207C2 NMEC-TP, 308C1 ND, NMEC-TP, 404C1 ND, NMEC-MP, 403C1 NMEC-TP, 305C3 NMEC-TP, 335C1 NMEC-TP, 401C1 NMEC-TP, 405C1 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 302C1 NMEC-T&MP, 402C1 NMEC-T&MP, 322C1 NMEC-T&MP, 300C2 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 304C1 NMEC-T&MP, 203C1 NMEC-T&MP, 401C5 NMEC-T&MP, 205C1 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 204C1 NMEC-T&MP, 323C1 NMEC-T&MP, 206C1 NMEC-TP, 207C1 NMEC-T&MP, 305C1 NMEC-T&MP, 318C2 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 406C1 NMEC-TP, 309C1 NMEC-MP, 202C2 ND, NMEC-MP, 201C10102030405060708090100 

# SVM Emissions ( μ g/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Raw MaterialFuelWasteSubst FuelMACTMEC : Uses MACT, NMEC : Does not use MACTTP : Adjusted based on control technology, MP : Adjusted based on MTEC levelBL : Baseline, ND : Contribution of raw material to feed was below detection levelFigure 6-2. Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, SVM, Cement Kilns, 6% Floor Analysis.MEC : Uses MACT, NMEC : Does not use MACTTP : Adjusted based on control technology, MP : Adjusted based on MTEC levelBL : Baseline, ND : Contribution of raw material to feed was below detection levelFigure 6-3. Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, LVM, Cement Kilns, 6% Floor Analysis.Non MACT 

# ND, MEC, 320C1 MEC, 316C2 MEC, 204C1 MEC, 308C1 MEC, 309C1 ND, MEC, 208C1 MEC, 303C3 ND, MEC, 335C1 MEC, 316C1 ND, MEC, 321C1 ND, MEC, 208C2 MEC, 318C2 MEC, 305C3 MEC, 317C1 BL, MEC, 317C3 MEC, 317C2 BL, MEC, 303C1 MEC, 202C2 ND, MEC, 207C2 ND, MEC, 207C1 MEC, 319C1

NMEC-MP, 315C1 NMEC-MP, 315C2 NMEC-MP, 306C1 NMEC-MP, 206C1 NMEC-MP, 205C1 ND, NMEC-MP, 322C1 NMEC-MP, 300C2 ND, NMEC-MP, 302C1 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 203C1 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 200C1 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 403C1 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 201C1 NMEC-T&MP, 305C1 NMEC, 301C2 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 402C1 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 404C1 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 405C1 ND, NMEC-TP, 401C1 NMEC, 401C5 ND, NMEC-T&MP, 406C1 NMEC-MP, 304C1 ND, NMEC-MP, 323C1 NMEC, 402C4010203040506070 

# LVM Emissions ( μ g/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Raw MaterialFuelWasteSubst FuelMACTMEC : Uses MACT, NMEC : Does not use MACTTP : Adjusted based on control technology, MP : Adjusted based on MTEC levelBL : Baseline, ND : Contribution of raw material to feed was below detection levelNon MACT 

# MEC, 204C2 MEC, 301C1 ND, MEC, 403C1 MEC, 315C1 MEC, 202C1 BL, MEC, 303C1 MEC, 315C2 MEC, 317C1 MEC, 306C1 MEC, 317C2 ND, MEC, 208C1 ND, MEC, 207C1 MEC, 308C1 MEC, 320C1 BL, MEC, 317C3 MEC, 321C1 ND, MEC, 205C1 MEC, 316C2 MEC, 305C3 MEC, 202C2 MEC, 316C1 MEC, 309C1 MEC, 303C2 MEC, 319C8 ND, MEC, 406C1 MEC, 318C1 MEC, 309C2 ND, MEC, 206C1 ND, MEC, 203C1 MEC, 335C1 MEC, 305C1 MEC, 319C6

ND, NMEC-MP, 403C2 ND, NMEC-MP, 405C1 NMEC-MP, 302C1 NMEC-MP, 200C1 ND, NMEC-MP, 401C5 NMEC-MP, 201C1 NMEC-MP, 322C1 ND, NMEC-MP, 402C1 NMEC-MP, 402C4 NMEC-MP, 401C1 NMEC-MP, 300C1 ND, NMEC-MP, 323C1 ND, NMEC-MP, 404C2 ND, NMEC-MP, 404C1050100150200250 

# Total Chlorine Emissions (ppmv @ 7% O 2 

# )Raw MaterialFuelWasteSubst FuelMACTFigure 6-4. Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, Total Chlorine, Cement Kilns, 6% Floor Analysis.MEC : Uses MACT, NMEC : Does not use MACTTP : Adjusted based on control technology, MP : Adjusted based on MTEC levelBL : Baseline, ND : Contribution of raw material to feed was below detection level 

# ND, MEC, 313C1

MEC, 225C1

ND, MEC, 312C1

ND, MEC, 310C1

MEC, 224C1

ND, MEC, 227C1

MEC, 223C1

ND, NMEC-MP, 311C1

ND, NMEC-MP, 314C1

NMEC-MP, 307C1

NMEC-MP, 307C3

NMEC-MP, 307C4

NMEC-MP, 307C205101520253035 

# Mercury Emissions ( μ g/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Raw MaterialFuelWasteSubst FuelFigure 6-5. Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, Mercury, LWAKs, 6% Floor Analysis.Non MACT 

# MEC, 225C1

MEC, 307C4

MEC, 224C1

MEC, 307C2

ND, NMEC-T&MP, 312C1

ND, NMEC-T&MP, 311C1

NMEC-MP, 223C1

NMEC, 307C3

NMEC-TP, 227C1

NMEC, 307C1

NMEC-MP, 313C1

NMEC-MP, 314C10100200300400500600700 

# SVM Emissions ( μ g/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Raw MaterialFuelWasteSubst FuelMACTMEC : Uses MACT, NMEC : Does not use MACTTP : Adjusted based on control technology, MP : Adjusted based on MTEC levelBL : Baseline, ND : Contribution of raw material to feed was below detection levelFigure 6-6. Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, SVM, LWAKs, 6% Floor Analysis.

# MEC, 225C1

MEC, 224C1

MEC, 227C1

MEC, 223C1

MEC, 312C1

MEC, 311C1

MEC, 314C1

NMEC-TP, 310C1

NMEC-T&MP, 307C3

NMEC-T&MP, 307C4

NMEC-T&MP, 307C2

NMEC-T&MP, 307C1

NMEC-MP, 313C1050100150200250 

# LVM Emissions ( μ g/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Raw MaterialFuelWasteSubst FuelMACTNon MACTMEC : Uses MACT, NMEC : Does not use MACTTP : Adjusted based on control technology, MP : Adjusted based on MTEC levelBL : Baseline, ND : Contribution of raw material to feed was below detection levelFigure 6-7. Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, LVM, LWAKs, 6% Floor Analysis.

# MEC, 307C3

MEC, 307C2

MEC, 307C4

MEC, 307C1

MEC, 225C1

ND, MEC, 314C1

ND, MEC, 310C1

ND, MEC, 311C1

MEC, 227C1

NMEC, 224C1

ND, NMEC-MP, 312C1

ND, NMEC-MP, 313C1

NMEC-MP, 223C10200400600800100012001400 

# Total Chlorine Emissions (ppmv @ 7% O 2 

# )Raw MaterialFuelWasteSubst FuelMACTNon MACTMEC : Uses MACT, NMEC : Does not use MACTTP : Adjusted based on control technology, MP : Adjusted based on MTEC levelBL : Baseline, ND : Contribution of raw material to feed was below detection levelFigure 6-8. Contribution of feedstreams to emissions levels, Total Chlorine, LWAKs, 6% Floor Analysis.Figure 6-9. Penetration vs maximum theoretical emission concentration for 6% databaseMACT add-on control data (SVM; Cement Kilns)0.00000.00010.00100.01001,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000MTEC (ug/dscm @ 7% O2)

Penetration (1-SRE)Figure 6-10. Penetration vs maximum theoretical emission concentration for 6% databaseMACT add-on control data (SVM; LWA Kilns)0.0000010.0000100.0001000.0010000.01000010,000 100,000 1,000,000MTEC (ug/dscm @ 7% O2)

Penetration (1-SRE)Figure 6-11. Penetration vs maximum theoretical emission concentration for 6%database MACT add-on control data (LVM; Cement Kilns)0.00000.00010.00100.01001,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000MTEC (ug/dscm @ 7% O2)

Penetration (1-SRE)Figure 6-12. Penetration vs maximum theoretical emission concentration for 6% databaseMACT add-on control data (LVM; LWA Kilns)0.00010.00100.010010,000100,000 1,000,000MTEC (ug/dscm @ 7% O2)

Penetration (1-SRE)

# REFERENCES

Acharya, P., S. DeCicco, and R. Novak, “Factors that can Influence and Control the Emissions of Dioxins and Furans from Hazardous Waste Incinerators,” Journal of Air and Waste Management
Association , Vol. 41, No. 12, pp. 1605-1615, December 1991.

Behan, F.B., U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste Memorandum titled “Wet Kins Equipped with Baghouses (Fabric Filters)”, May 16, 1994.

Blizard, G. and R. Tidona, “Design, Installation and Start-Up of a Rotary Kiln Hospital Waste Incineration System with Heat Recovery and SDA/FF APC System,” Proceedings of the 1992 Incineration Conference , pp. 425-429, Albuquerque, NM, May 1992.

Blumbach, J. and L. Nethe, “Sorbalit - A New Economic Approach Reducing Mercury and Dioxin Emissions,” Proceedings of 85th Annual Air and Waste Management Association Meeting , Kansas City, MO, 92-41.09, June 21-26, 1992.

Boos, R., R. Budin, et al., “PCDD- and PCDF Destruction by a SCR-Unit in a Municipal Waste Incinerator,” Chemosphere , Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 375-382, 1993.

Brna, T., “Toxic Metal Emissions from MWCs and Their Control,” Proceedings of the Municipal Waste Combustion International Specialty Conference , Air and Waste Management Association, VIP-19, Tampa, FL, pp. 145-161, April 1991.

Brown, B. and K. Felsvang, “Control of Mercury and Dioxin Emissions from United States and European Municipal Waste Incinerators by Spray Dryer Absorption Systems,” Proceedings of the Municipal Waste Combustion International Specialty Conference , Air and Waste Management Association, VIP-19, Tampa, FL, pp. 675-705, April 1991.

Christiansen, O. and B. Brown, “Control of Heavy Metals and Dioxins from Hazardous Waste Incinerators by Spray Dryer Absorption Systems and Activated Carbon Injection,” Proceedings of 85th Annual Air and Waste Management Association Meeting , Kansas City, MO, 92-41.06, June 21-26, 1992.

Clarke, M., “The Nation's First Mercury Emissions Standard: An Assessment of New Jersey's Standard for Municipal Waste Combustors,” Proceedings of the 86th Annual Air and Waste Management Association Meeting , Denver, CO, 93-RP-154.01, June 13-18, 1993.

Clarke, M., “A Review of Activated Carbon Technologies for Reducing MSW Incinerator Emissions,” Proceedings of the Municipal Waste Combustion International Specialty Conference

, Air and Waste Management Association, VIP-19, Tampa, FL, pp. 975-994, April 1991.

Davis, R.J., T.R. Kiska, and S.W. Felix, “A Comparative Evaluation of High-Temperature PulseJet Baghouse Filter Fabrics,” Proceedings of the 1990 National Waste Processing Conference

, sponsored by Amerian Society of Mechanical Engineers, Long Beach, CA, June 3-6, 1990.

Donnelly, J. and F. Felsvang, “Joy/Niro SDA MSW Gas Cleaning Systems New Developments,” Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Air and Waste Management Association Meeting , Anaheim, CA, 89-109.6, June 25-30, 1989.

Durkee, K. and J. Eddinger, “Status of EPA Regulatory Development Program for Medical Waste Incinerators -- Results of Emission Test Program,” Proceedings of the 1992 Incineration Conference , Albuquerque, NM, pp. 447-456, May 11-15, 1992.

R-1

# Durkee, K. and J. Eddinger, “Status of EPA Regulatory Program for Medical Waste Incinerations -- Performance and Costs of Control Options,” Proceedings of the 1993 Incineration Conference

, Knoxville, TN, pp. 381-388, May 1993.

EER (Energy and Environmental Research Corporation), “Emissions Testing of Ash Grove Cement Company Foreman, Arkansas Waste-Derived Fuel Facility Cement Kiln No. 3,” Prepared for the U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste under contract EPA Contract 68-D2-0164, Work Assignment 2-07, May 1995.

EER (Energy and Environmental Research Corporation), “Combustion Emissions Technical Resource Document (CETRED),” prepared for the U.S. EPA under contract No. 68-D2-0164, May 1994.

Felsvang, K., R. Gleiser, G. Juip, and K. Nielsen, “Activated Carbon Injection in Spray Dryer/ESP/FF for Mercury and Toxics Control,” Proceedings of the Trace Elements Transformation in Coal-Fired Power Systems Workshop , Scottsdale, AZ, April 19-21, 1993.

Fledt, K., “Electrostatic Precipitator Vs. Fabric Filter for Dioxin/Furan Emission Control on Hazardous Waste Incinerator at SAKAB Sweden,” Proceedings of the Air and Waste Management Association, Vancouver, BC, June 1991.

Fouhy, K., “Legislation Scrubs Fluegas Emissions,” Chemical Engineering , pp. 31-35, June
1992.

Frankenhaeuser, M., Manninen, H., Koho, I., et al., “Organic Emissions from Co-Combustion of Mixed Plastics with Coal in a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Boiler,” Chemosphere , Vol. 27, Nos. 1-3, pp. 309-316, 1993.

Frillici, P., R. Li, G. Bacon, and D. Hayes, “Evaluation of Mercury Emission Reduction Alternatives for the Fort Dix Resource Recovery Facility,” Proceedings of the 86th Annual Air and Waste Management Association Meeting , Denver, CO, June 13-18, 93-RP-154.03, 1993.

Gaige, C. and R. Halil, “Clearing the Air About Municipal Waste Combustors,” Solid Waste and
Power , pp. 12-17, January/February 1992.

Guest, T., “Mercury Control in Canada,” 86th Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management
Association , Denver, CO, 93-WP-109.01, June 21-26, 1993.

Gullett, B. and W. Jozewicz, “Bench-Scale Sorption and Desorption of Mercury with Activated Carbon,” Proceedings of the Municipal Waste Combustion International Specialty Conference , Air and Waste Management Association, VIP-32, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 903-917, March 1993.

Gullett, B., K. Bruce, and L. Beach, “Effect of Sulfur Dioxide on the Formation Mechanism of Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxin and Dibenzofuran in Municipal Waste Combustors,” Environmental Science and Technology , Vol. 26, No. 10, 1992.

Hagenmaier, K., K. Tichaczek, H. Brunner, and G. Mittelbach, “Application of De-NO
x 

# Catalysts for the Reduction of Emissions of PCDD/PCDF and Other PICs from Waste Incineration Facilities by Catalytic Oxidation,” Proceedings of the Municipal Waste Combustion International Specialty Conference , Air and Waste Management Association, VIP-19, Tampa, FL, p. 382, April
1991.

Harrison, W.A., K.M. Cushing, and R.L. Chang, “Pilot Scale Demonstration of a Compact

R-2

# Hybrid Particulate Collector COHPAC II,” Electric Power Research Institute, 1994.

Hartenstein, H., “A Fixed Bed Activated Coke/Carbon Filter as a Final Gas Cleaning Stage Retrofited for a Hazardous Waste Incineration Plant - The First 6 Months of Operating Experience,” Proceedings of 85th Annual Air and Waste Management Association Meeting

, Kansas City, MO, 92-48.04, June 21-26, 1992.

Hartenstein, H., “Fixed Bed Activated Coke Filters for the Control of Toxic Metals and Organics from Waste Incinerators - the Second Generation,” Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association , 93-TP-63.01, Denver, CO, June 13-18, 1993.

Hartenstein, H., “Activated Carbon Filters for Flue Gas Polishing of MWI’s,” Proceedings of the Municipal Waste Combustion International Specialty Conference , Air and Waste Management Association, VIP-32, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 87-105, March 1993.

Hiraoka, M., Takkeda, N., Kasakura, T., et al., “Catalytic Destruction of PCDDs in Flue Gas,” presented at Dioxin '90 EPRI Seminar, Bayreuth, F.R.G., 1990.

Horler, S., and C. Clements, “Commercial Scale Dioxin Inhibition Test at a Waste to Energy Plant -- Switzerland, Proceedings of the 1994 Incineration Conference , Houston, TX, pp. 231-237, May 9-13, 1994.

Hyland, G., W. Cramer, G. Faloon, and R. Holder, “State of the Art, Small-Scale Medical Waste Incinerator Operating Case History,” Proceedings of the 1993 Incineration Conference , Knoxville, TN, pp. 355-362, May 3-7, 1993.

Joy Environmental Technologies, telephone conversion on July 12, 1994 with Rick Gleiser, (713) 878-1000 (1994).

Junk, G., and Richard, J., Chemosphere , Vol. 10, pp. 1237-1241, 1981.

Kassebohm, B. and S. Streng, “The Three Stage Flue Gas Cleanup System Dusseldorf,” Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association , Denver, CO, 93-MP-5.05, June 13-18, 1993.

Kilgroe, J., T. Brna, D. White, et al., “Camden County MWC Carbon Injection Test Results,” Proceedings of the Municipal Waste Combustion International Specialty Conference , Air and Waste Management Association, VIP-32, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 123-142, March 1993.

Kreindl, T. and G. Brinkman, “Case Studies of Particulate Matter, Heavy Metals, and Total Equivalent Dioxin/Furan Collection Using PTFE Membrane Filter Media,” Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association , Vancouver, BC, 91-32.3, June
1991.

Krivanek, S., “Mercury Control Technologies for MWC's; The Unanswered Questions,” Proceedings of the Municipal Waste Combustion International Specialty Conference , Air and Waste Management Association, VIP-32, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 824-840, March 1993.

Lindbauer, R., Wurst, F., and T. Prey, “Combustion Dioxin Suppression in Municipal Solid Waste Incineration with Sulphur Additives,” Chemosphere , Vol. 25, Nos. 7-10, pp. 1409-1414,
1992.

Mattila, H., Virtanen, T., et al., “Emissions of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans in Flue Gas from Co-combustion of Mixed Plastics with Coal and Bark,”

R-3

# Chemosphere , Vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 1599-1609, 1992.

Morun, B., and F. Schwarzkopf, “Use of High-Surface-Are-Hydrate-Additive in a Two Stage Process,” Proceedings of the 1992 Incineration Conference , Albuquerque, NM, pp. 133-139, May 11-15, 1992.

Naikwadi, K.P., and R.W. Karasek, “Laboratory Evaluation of PCDD/PCDF Inhibition Technology in a Swiss Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator, Proceedings of the 1994 Incineration Conference , Houston, TX, pp. 231-237, May 9-13, 1994.

Nethe, L., “Ein Weg zu weniger Quecksilber und Dioxin,” Umwelt Magazin , pp. 60-61, November 1990.

Ok, G., Y. Hanai, and T. Katou, “Decomposition of Chlorinated Dioxins, Odorous Compounds
and NO
x 

# from MSW Incineration Plant by Oxidizing Catalyst,” Chemosphere , Vol. 26, No. 12, pp. 2167-2172, 1993.

Passamaquoddy Technology, Recovery Scrubber Literature, 1994.

Penta Engineering, “Review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Model Kiln Scenarios and Cost Estimates for Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Portland Cement Kiln Industry,” prepared for the Portland Cement Association, December 23, 1994.

Petti, V., T.J. Porter, and M.A. Sandell, “Control of Particulate, Acid Gases, Metals, and Nitrogen Oxides from the Falls Recycling Energy Recovery Facility,” ICAC Forum ‘90 -- Living With Air Toxics and NO
x 

# Emission Controls , Washington, DC, November 1-2, 1994.

Piechura, H., P Zeeb, and R. Kwiatkowski, “Rotary Kiln Incinerator with New Design for Mercury, Dioxins, and NO
x 

# Control,” Proceedings of the 1994 Incineration Conference , Houston, TX, pp. 231-237, May 9-13, 1994.

Politi, D., A. Harleston, and E. Mull, “Control of Flue Gas Emissions at the Healthwaste Medical Waste Incineration Facility Bronx, New York: A State of the Art Medical Waste Disposal Facility,” Proceedings of the 1993 Incineration Conference , Knoxville, TN, pp. 389-394, May 3-7, 1993.

Richman, M., D. Fickling, and J. Hahn, “Mercury Removal Studies at a Municipal Waste Combustor in Marion County, Oregon,” Proceedings of the Municipal Waste Combustion International Specialty Conference, Air and Waste Management Association, VIP-32, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 918-932, March 1993.

Rowland, B., C.P. Ganatra, and J. Woolston, “A Pollution Control Idea Whose Time Has Come,” W.L. Gore and Associates Inc., 1993.

Schoner, P., “An Innovative System for the Emission Control of Heavy Metals and Dioxin,” Proceedings of the 1992 Incineration Conference , Albuquerque, NM, pp. 129-132, May 1992.

Schoner, P., “Investigations of the Reduction of PCDD and PCDF Emissions at Hazardous Waste Incineration Plant,” Chemosphere , Vol. 25, Nos. 7-10, pp. 1421-1427, 1992.

Shamekhi, R., H. Petersen, and W. Panknin, “Research into Activated Carbon Technology on Harmful Organic Substances, Heavy Metals and NO
x 

# Control,” Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Air and Waste Management Association Meeting , Pittsburgh, PA, 90-25.1, June 24-29, 1990.

Steag, telephone conversion on July 25, 1994 with Volker Rummenhohl, (202) 338-8767, 1994.

R-4

# Stohr, J., J. Furrer, J. Hunsigner, and S. Kreisz, “Final Cleaning of Flue Gas from Municipal Waste Incinerators,” Proceedings of the1993 Incineration Conference , Knoxville, TN, pp. 203- 206, May 3-7, 1993.

Teller, A., et al., “Emission Control from Hospital Waste Incineration,” presented at Hazardous Materials Control Research Institute's Great Lake 90 Conference, Cleveland, OH, September 26- 28, 1990.

White, D., K. Nebel, and M. Johnston, “Municipal Waste Combustors: A Survey of Mercury Emissions and Applicable Control Technologies,” Proceedings of the Municipal Waste Combustion International Specialty Conference , Air and Waste Management Association, VIP-19, Tampa, FL, pp. 652-662, April 1991.

White, D., T. Brna, et al., “Parametric Evaluation of Powdered Activated Carbon Injection for Control of Mercury Emissions from a Municipal Waste Combustor,” Proceedings of 85th Annual Air and Waste Management Association Meeting , Kansas City, MO, 92-40.06, June 21-26, 1992.

Wilken M. and A. Beyer, “Praktische Zonzepte zur Vermidnderung der Bildung von Polychlorierten Dibenzodioxinene und Dibenzofuranen bei kommunalen Mullverbrennungsanlagen,” by ITU-Forschungsgesellschaft Technischer Umweltschutz for Umweltbundesamt, Berlin, Germany, April 1990.

Wood, J., EPA/ISB Memorandum to K. Durkee, “Survey of Southwestern Portland Cement Co. Plant, Conducted August 22, 1994 -- Revised Trip Report per Southdown, Inc. 10/21/94 Comments,” “Survey of Honam Portland Cement Co. Plant, Conducted August 23, 1994 -- Revised Trip Report per Comments Received from Holnam 10/19/94,” 1995.

R-5

# APPENDIX A

FLOOR DETERMINATIONS USING “12% FLOOR” PROCEDURE

MACT floor levels for existing sources are discussed using the “12% Floor” procedure (as opposed to the “6% Floor” approach presented in Section 3 of the main report) for each of the HAP (or HAP surrogate) and source category combinations. The “12% Floor” procedure is identical to the 6% procedure in all steps except:

• The MACT pool of best performing sources is based on the top 12% (or 5 if less than 30 sources in the entire universe) as opposed to the 6% Floor approach for which the MACT pool is based on the top 6% (or 3 if less than 30 sources). This potentially affects the definition of MACT (which is based on the control techniques used by the sources in the MACT pool), and the MACT EU (which is selected based on the definition of MACT).

• The statistical analysis of the MACT EU is different. For the proposed 6% Floor approach used in Section 3, the MACT standard is based on the highest emitting source in the MACT EU taking into consideration expected variability within test conditions. For the 12% Floor procedure, the MACT standard is based on the “average” source in the entire MACT EU with the consideration of variability, using a delta-lognormal methodology, discussed in more detail in Appendix C “Statistical Analysis of Hazardous Air Pollutant Concentrations from Hazardous Waste Combustors”. The average level is the “design” value at which the facility needs to operate to meet the standard 99% of the time (similar to that used for the 6% Floor approach).

The discussions in the following include for each combination:

• Summary tables of all test condition stack gas emissions data from the HWC database presented in the accompanying Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards,

Volume II: HWC Emissions Data Base

.

• Identification of the best-performing MACT pool sources, the range of emissions levels of the best performing sources, MACT technologies used by the best performing technologies (used to define MACT), and discussion of “equivalent technologies” used to expand the definition of MACT if appropriate.

• Identification of the MACT expanded universe (EU) facilities based on the definition of

MACT.

A-1

# • The existing source MACT design and standard level based on the statistical analysis of the MACT EU population of source test conditions.

For a discussion of the HAP control techniques used by the existing sources and the range of emission levels for the entire source category see Section 3 of the main report.

The summary ranking tables for each of the HAP and source category combinations are used to define the MACT pool, determine the expanded universe, and screen out conditions. The tables contain the following columns of information for each test condition (row entry) from left to right across the table (similar to that used in Section 3 of the main report):

• “Subst” -- Defines the HAP of interest (“PM” stands for particulate matter, “TEQ” stands for PCDD/PCDF TEQ, “SVM” for semi-volatile metals, “LVM” for low volatility metals,
“TOT CL” for total chlorine, “CO” for carbon monoxide, and “HC” for total hydrocarbons).

• “Syst Type” -- Defines the source category type (“INC” for incinerators, “CK” for cement kilns, and “LWAK” for light weight aggregate kilns).

• “EPA Cond ID” -- Defines the test condition identification number corresponding to the ID number used in the EPA HWC database. The first three digits identify the combustion source emitting point (each emitting source must have its own stack), followed by the test condition ID number (e.g., “C2” stands for test condition number 2). The test condition ID is required since some facility emitting points have a number of different test conditions for the same HAP. Three digit ID numbers for the source emitting points are cross referenced to facility name and locations in Appendix E.

• “APCS” -- Identifies the devices used in the air pollution control system. An acronyms list for the various devices is provided in Appendix D in accompanying Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standards, Volume II: HWC Emissions Data Base

.

• For PCDD/PCDF only, “APCS Class” -- Identifies the type of air pollution control system used. A “w” stands for wet, “d” for dry, or w/d” for wet/dry.

• For PCDD/PCDF only, “PM APCD Temp” -- This identifies the flue gas temperature at the primary PM APCD. It is used for PCDD/PCDF to define MACT.

• For total chlorine, and metals (SVM, LVM, and mercury), “MTEC” -- MTEC is used to

define MACT and determine the MACT EU. The MTECs shown consider that contributed by hazardous waste only, and do not include that from the raw materials or supplemental fuels. MTECs are used in the MACT process; the calculation of MTEC is described in

detail in Section 2 of this volume.

• “Stack Gas Conc” -- Stack gas emissions concentrations of the HAP of interest for the test condition. Average (“Avg”) of all the individual runs (usually three) in test condition, as

A-2

# well as the maximum (“Max”) and minimum (“Min”) of the individual run levels are provided. Note that the test conditions are ranked, lowest to highest, by condition average.

• “Comments” -- Identifies for each test condition the following:

-- “MACT source” -- Used if the condition is one of the best-performing MACT sources (in MACT pool), and is used to define MACT. The HAP control method used by the condition follows in the parenthesis.

-- “Already MACT source” -- Used if a condition of the same facility has already been included in the MACT pool.

-- “In” -- Used if the condition is considered as part of MACT expanded universe. The reason is included in the parenthesis.

-- “Out” -- Used if the condition is not considered as part of the MACT EU. Reasons are given following. For example, “Not MACT” signifies that the condition does not use MACT technology; “Poor MB” signifies that the condition has a poor mass balance; “HW not burned” signifies that this is a baseline condition where hazardous wastes are not burned; “DL measurement” is used when the measurement level of the stack gas is at the analytical detection limit.

A.1 PCDD/PCDF TEQ

A.1.1 Incinerators

The MACT EU determination is similar to that presented in Section 3 using the 6% Floor. Table A-1 presents the evaluation of the MACT pool and EU. The statistical analysis of the MACT EU provides a design level of 0.12 TEQ ng/dscm and a standard of 0.25 TEQ ng/dscm.

A.1.2 Cement Kilns

The MACT EU determination is similar to that presented in Section 3 using the 6% Floor. Table A-2 presents the evaluation of the MACT pool and EU. The statistical analysis of the MACT EU provides a design level of 0.14 TEQ ng/dscm and a standard of 0.23 TEQ ng/dscm.

A.1.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

The MACT floor, as explained in Section 3, is similar to that for cement kilns presented

above.

A.2 PARTICULATE MATTER

A.2.1 Incinerators

A-3

# Table A-3 summarizes all particulate matter (PM) test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The MACT pool is comprised of 11 sources. All MACT sources control PM to less than 0.002 gr/dscf on average. MACT is defined by the use of a variety of different PM control devices, including VSs (by themselves), FFs, ESPs, and IWSs. The MACT EU contains sources with test condition averages up to 0.08 gr/dscf. Statistical analysis of the MACT EU provided a floor design level of 0.012 gr/dscf, with a corresponding standard level of 0.024 gr/dscf. Over 50% of all existing facilities meet this standard.

A.2.2 Cement Kilns

Table A-4 summarizes all PM test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The MACT pool consists of 5 sources. These sources have emissions levels below 0.01 gr/dscf on average. MACT is defined as the use of either the use of FFs with air-to-cloth ratio less than 2.3 or an ESP with an SCA of less than 434. The MACT EU contains conditions with average levels up to 0.05. Statistical analysis of the EU provides a MACT design level of 0.024 and a MACT standard of 0.043. However, as discussed in Section 3, a MACT floor level of 0.03 gr/dscf based on CK New Source Performance Standards, not the statistically-derived limit discussed above, is chosen to represent the MACT floor level. This level is achievable by about 60% of the existing hazardous waste burning CKs.

A.2.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

Table A-5 summarizes all PM test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The MACT pool consists of 5 sources. These sources have emissions levels below 0.007 gr/dscf on average. MACT is defined as the use of FFs for PM control with an air-to-cloth

ratio of less than 2.8 acfm/ft 2 

# , or the use of FFs with air-to-cloth ratio of less than 4 in conjunction with venturi scrubbing. The MACT EU contains conditions with average levels up to 0.02 gr/dscf. Statistical analysis of the EU provides a MACT design level of 0.006 gr/dscf and a corresponding MACT standard of 0.012 gr/dscf.

A.3 MERCURY

A.3.1 Incinerators

Table A-6 summarizes all mercury test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The MACT pool is comprised of the top 5 sources. These sources have condition average emissions levels of less than 1.4 μ g/dscm. The sources use both feedrate control only and feedrate control with wet scrubbing. MACT is defined as either feedrate control with an MTEC

less than 19 μ g/dscm, or a wet scrubber with a feedrate control MTEC less than 1.8x10 3 

# . The floor design level is determined to be 5.6 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 13

μ g/dscm. About 40% of conditions in the entire HWI universe currently meet this design level using feedrate with or without mercury emissions control devices (wet scrubbers).

A.3.2 Cement Kilns

A-4

# Table A-7 summarizes all mercury test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The MACT pool is comprised of the top 5 sources. These sources have average

emissions levels of less than 17 μ g/dscm. MACT is defined as feedrate control with a hazardous

waste MTEC less than 108 μ g/dscm. The floor design level is determined to be 21 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 32 μ g/dscm. About 50% of conditions in the entire CK universe currently meet this design level.

A.3.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

Table A-8 summarizes all mercury test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. Similar to CKs discussed above, the top 5 MACT pool sources utilize feedrate control. These MACT pool sources have condition average emissions levels below 15 μ g/dscm. MACT is defined based on feedrate control used by the highest MACT pool source. The MACT feedrate

control MTEC level is 24 μ g/dscm. The MACT floor design is determined to be 17 μ g/dscm,

while the associated MACT standard is 32 μ g/dscm. About 50% of the facilities currently meet this design level.

A.4 SEMI VOLATILE METALS

A.4.1 Incinerators

Table A-9 summarizes all SVM test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The MACT pool is comprised of the top 5 sources. These sources have average

emissions levels less than 10 μ g/dscm. These sources, defining MACT, use:

• VS with an MTEC of 1.7x10 2 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 500C1). Any PM control device is considered as equivalent technology.

• ESP and WS combination with an MTEC of 5.8x10 3 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 340C1).

• VS and IWS with an MTEC of 4.9x10 4 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 354C1). FF as equivalent technology.

• FF and WS with an MTEC of 1.9x105 μ g/dscm (based on source 209C2).

The floor design level is determined to be 22 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level

of 53 μ g/dscm. About 25% of conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level.

A.4.2 Cement Kilns

Table A-10 summarizes all SVM test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The MACT pool is comprised of the top 5 sources. These sources have average

emissions levels less than 13 μ g/dscm. MACT is defined as either a FF with an air-to-cloth ratio

of less than 2.3 acfm/ft 2 

# and MTEC of less than 8.4x10 4 

# μ g/dscm, or an ESP with an SCA of less

A-5

# than 420 and an MTEC of less than 2.1x10 5 

# μ g/dscm. The MACT floor design level is determined

to be 92 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 240 μ g/dscm. About 44% of conditions in the entire universe currently meet this design level.

A.4.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

Table A-11 summarizes all SVM test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The MACT pool is comprised of the top 5 sources. These sources have average

emissions levels less than 30 μ g/dscm. MACT is defined as the use of either an FF with air-tocloth ratio less than 2.8 acfm/ft 2 

# and an MTEC of less than 2.7x10 5 

# μ g/dscm or a combination of

FF and VS with the FF at an air-to-cloth ratio less than 4.4 and an MTEC less than 5.7x10 4 

# . The MACT floor design level is determined to be 36 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of

57 μ g/dscm. About 60% of conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level.

A.5 LOW VOLATILE METALS

A.5.1 Incinerators

Table A-12 summarizes all LVM test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The MACT pool is comprised of the top 5 sources. These sources have average

emissions levels less than 10 μ g/dscm. These sources, defining MACT, use:

• VS with an MTEC of 1.4x10 3 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 500C1). Any PM control device is considered as equivalent technology.

• IWS with an MTEC of 6.2x10 3 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 348C1). FF is considered as equivalent technology.

• VS and IWS with an MTEC of 2.7x10 4 

# μ g/dscm (based on source 354C1). FF or ESP is considered as equivalent technology.

The floor design level is determined to be 28 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level

of 61 μ g/dscm. About 30% of conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level.

A.5.2 Cement Kilns

Table A-13 summarizes all LVM test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. The MACT pool is comprised of the top 5 sources. These sources have average

emissions levels less than 9 μ g/dscm. MACT is defined as either a FF with an air-to-cloth ratio of

less than 2.3 acfm/ft 2 

# and a MTEC of less than 4.4x10 4 

# μ g/dscm or an ESP with a specific
collection area (SCA) greater than 350 ft 2 

# /kacfm with an MTEC less than 2x10 5 

# μ g/dscm. The floor design level is determined to be 19 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 46

μ g/dscm. Over 40% of conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design

A-6

# level.

A.5.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

Table A-14 summarizes all LVM test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The MACT pool is comprised of the top 5 sources. These sources have average

emissions levels less than 60 μ g/dscm. MACT is defined as a FF with air-to-cloth ratio less than

3.6 acfm/ft 2 

# and an MTEC of less than 4.6x10 4 

# μ g/dscm. The floor design level is determined to

be 36 μ g/dscm, with a corresponding standard level of 57 μ g/dscm. Over half of the conditions in the entire existing source universe currently meet this design level.

A.6 TOTAL CHLORINE (HCl + Cl 2 

# )

A.6.1 Incinerators

Table A-15 summarizes all total chlorine test condition data from HWIs, ranked by condition average. The top 6 MACT pool sources use wet scrubbers for chlorine control. This includes combinations of venturi and packed bed scrubbing, and hydrosonic scrubbing by itself. These MACT pool sources have condition average emissions levels below 0.4 ppmv. MACT is defined based on feedrate control used by the highest MACT pool source in combination with wet
scrubbing. The MACT feedrate control MTEC level is 2.1x10 7 

# μ g/dscm. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 8.6 ppmv, while the associated MACT standard is 23 ppmv. About 50% of all test conditions in the entire source category universe meet this design level.

A.6.2 Cement Kilns

Table A-16 summarizes all total chlorine test condition data from CKs, ranked by condition average. MACT for chlorine control in CKs is defined by chlorine feedrate control. The top 5 MACT pool sources have condition average emissions levels below 1.4 ppmv. MACT is defined

based on the a chlorine feedrate MTEC of 2.2x10 6 

# μ g/dscm. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 11 ppmv, while the associated MACT standard is 25 ppmv. About 40% of all existing source test conditions meet this design level.

A.6.3 Light Weight Aggregate Kilns

Table A-17 summarizes all total chlorine test condition data from LWAKs, ranked by condition average. The top 5 MACT pool sources use a combination of feedrate control and wet venturi scrubber as well as feedrate control alone for chlorine control. These MACT pool sources have condition average emissions levels below 1,241 ppmv. MACT is defined as either the use of
wet scrubbing with a feedrate control MTEC of 1.4x10 7 

# or feedrate control alone with an MTEC

level of 1.9x10 6 

# μ g/dscm. The MACT floor design level is determined to be 1,300 ppmv, while the associated MACT standard is 1,800 ppmv. About 90% of all test conditions meet this design

level.

A.7 TRACE ORGANIC SURROGATES

A-7

# The discussion in Section 3 for CO and HC floors for the 6% analysis applies also to the 12% analysis.

A.8 SUMMARY OF 12% FLOOR LEVELS

A summary of the MACT floor design and standard levels determined based on a statistical evaluation of the MACT EU for existing sources for the 12% analysis is given in Table A-18.

A-8Page 1TABLE A-1. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS APCS PM APCD Stack Gas Conc (ng/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID Class Temp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM w 163 0.00 0.00 0.00 MACT source (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM w 163 0.01 0.01 0.00 Source already in MACT poolD/F TEQ INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT w 0.01 0.01 0.01 MACT source (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS w 0.01 0.02 0.01 MACT source (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 706C3 QT/HS/C w 0.01 0.01 0.01 MACT source (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C8 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 0.02 0.02 0.01 MACT source (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES w 0.02 0.02 0.01 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C9 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 0.02 0.06 0.01 In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM w 164 0.03 0.03 0.02 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 706C2 QT/HS/C w 0.03 0.03 0.02 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM w 192 0.03 0.03 0.03 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C7 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 383 0.03 0.04 0.02 In: MACT EU (dry w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM w 161 0.04 0.04 0.04 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM w 191 0.04 0.05 0.04 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 331C1 PT/IWS w 0.06 0.11 0.02 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C5 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 383 0.07 0.10 0.04 In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 359 0.07 0.08 0.06 In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 214C1 IWS w 105 0.10 0.19 0.04 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS w 0.10 0.10 0.10 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM w 178 0.13 0.14 0.11 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 808C1 QT/PBS/ESP w 0.15 0.18 0.13 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 1001C1 ? ? 0.16 0.28 0.07 Out: Unknown APCSD/F TEQ INC 725C1 WS/QT w 0.17 0.25 0.06 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP w 0.17 0.27 0.12 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS w 0.20 0.20 0.20 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C4 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 381 0.22 0.45 0.15 In: MACT EU (dry APCS w/ ACI)D/F TEQ INC 915C2 QC/VS/C w 0.24 0.32 0.18 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM w 0.25 0.35 0.19 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS w 0.39 0.39 0.39 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM w 0.40 0.60 0.16 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM w 0.56 0.99 0.28 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS w 0.63 0.63 0.63 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 915C3 QC/VS/C w 0.68 0.84 0.57 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT w 0.69 1.23 0.34 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)Page 2TABLE A-1. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS APCS PM APCD Stack Gas Conc (ng/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID Class Temp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ INC 327C4 SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 400 0.76 0.95 0.57 In: MACT EU (dry APCS < 400°F)D/F TEQ INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS w 0.78 0.78 0.78 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 384 1.21 1.70 0.82 In: MACT EU (dry APCS < 400°F)D/F TEQ INC 327C5 SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 460 1.31 2.00 0.90 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 325C9 SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 430 2.02 2.30 1.75 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 325A2 SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 460 2.13 2.20 2.00 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 379 2.22 2.62 1.50 In: MACT EU (dry APCS < 400°F)D/F TEQ INC 325C8 SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 460 2.26 2.43 2.16 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 325A1 SD/FF/WS/IWS w/d 460 2.37 2.50 2.30 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT w 3.48 4.53 2.97 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS w/d 411 3.61 4.86 1.88 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 914C1 ? ? 4.39 4.39 4.39 Out: Unknown ACPSD/F TEQ INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS w 500 4.51 11.18 1.05 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS w 500 8.02 11.19 3.14 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 457 8.50 10.90 7.15 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 450 18.36 22.86 13.34 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP w/d 450 20.10 27.50 10.99 Out: Not MACTD/F TEQ INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM w 33.47 76.46 9.45 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)D/F TEQ INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM w 38.54 73.22 3.85 In: MACT EU (wet APCS)Page 1TABLE A-2. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INDUSTRIAL KILNS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS APCS PM APCD Stack Gas Conc (ng/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID Class Temp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ CK 208C1 ESP d 409 0.00 0.01 0.00 MACT source (409°F)D/F TEQ CK 207C1 MC/ESP d 418 0.02 0.02 0.02 MACT source (418°F)D/F TEQ CK 205C3 ESP d 470 0.02 0.03 0.02 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 315C2 FF d 403 0.02 0.02 0.02 MACT source (403°F)D/F TEQ LWAK 336C2 FF d 400 0.04 0.04 0.04 MACT source (400°F)D/F TEQ CK 401C4 ESP d 296 0.04 0.05 0.03 MACT source (296°F)D/F TEQ CK 315C1 FF d 341 0.04 0.04 0.04 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 402C3 ESP d 276 0.04 0.05 0.04 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 206C4 ESP d 530 0.04 0.06 0.03 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ LWAK 336C1 FF d 400 0.04 0.05 0.04 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 401C3 ESP d 379 0.04 0.05 0.04 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 316C2 FF d 492 0.05 0.07 0.03 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 401C5 ESP d 365 0.05 0.06 0.03 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 322C53 ESP d 374 0.05 0.05 0.05 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 323C52 ESP d 351 0.05 0.05 0.05 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 306C1 MC/FF d 547 0.05 0.06 0.05 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C52 ESP d 497 0.06 0.09 0.04 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 323C50 ESP d 360 0.07 0.17 0.04 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 322C54 ESP d 455 0.09 0.09 0.08 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 320C1 FF d 484 0.09 0.13 0.05 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 228C4 ESP d 381 0.12 0.21 0.07 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 319C51 ESP d 568 0.13 0.20 0.05 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 402C4 ESP d 350 0.13 0.15 0.11 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 304C3 ESP d 417 0.14 0.18 0.09 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 319C9 ESP d 426 0.16 0.20 0.11 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 405C1 ESP d 256 0.17 0.28 0.10 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 205C4 ESP d 470 0.20 0.37 0.05 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319B1 ESP d 462 0.34 0.48 0.24 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 228C3 ESP d 459 0.37 0.57 0.21 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C52 ESP d 415 0.45 0.45 0.45 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 204C2 ESP d 597 0.47 0.75 0.28 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 406C1 ESP d 352 0.50 0.95 0.30 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 316C1 FF d 507 0.58 1.54 0.09 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 335C50 ESP d 400 0.59 0.62 0.56 In: MACT EUPage 2TABLE A-2. PCDD/PCDF TEQ, INDUSTRIAL KILNS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS APCS PM APCD Stack Gas Conc (ng/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID Class Temp (°F) Avg Max MinD/F TEQ CK 319C54 ESP d 518 0.60 0.61 0.60 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 319C53 ESP d 499 0.62 1.11 0.32 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 323C51 ESP d 400 0.79 0.91 0.67 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 319C50 ESP d 562 0.95 1.07 0.77 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C51 ESP d 460 1.00 1.00 1.00 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 404C1 ESP d 498 1.02 1.55 0.60 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 402C1 ESP d 433 1.02 1.39 0.64 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 204C3 ESP d 596 1.10 1.79 0.75 Out: HW not burnedD/F TEQ CK 319C5 ESP d 443 1.12 1.12 1.12 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 317C2 FF d 505 1.13 1.16 1.06 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 317C3 FF d 500 1.32 1.32 1.32 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 401C1 ESP d 436 1.76 3.84 0.35 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 206C3 ESP d 563 1.97 2.51 1.40 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 304C1 ESP d 527 3.62 4.23 3.18 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C1 ESP d 537 3.72 5.90 2.59 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 403C1 ESP d 493 3.82 12.64 0.50 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 203C1 ESP d 383 5.06 7.64 1.95 In: MACT EUD/F TEQ CK 323C1 ESP d 490 5.18 9.39 2.56 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 322C50 ESP d 500 5.60 8.37 3.64 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C7 ESP d 474 5.79 5.79 5.79 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C6 ESP d 527 7.54 9.35 5.74 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 300C2 ESP d 608 10.97 13.20 6.63 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 319C2 ESP d 593 19.71 25.83 14.70 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 335C1 ESP d 718 32.42 50.52 21.82 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 305C3 ESP d 741 49.46 62.26 29.67 Out: High APCD temperatureD/F TEQ CK 309C1 MC/ESP d 641 49.86 57.34 40.14 Out: High APCD temperatureTABLE A-3. PM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) APCSType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min new actPM INC 500C4 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.000 0.000 0.000 Out: Source category outlierPM INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 0.000 0.001 0.000 MACT source (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.001 0.001 0.000 MACT source (VS/IWS)PM INC 350C2 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.000 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.001 0.001 0.001 Out: HW not burnedPM INC 350C6 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.001 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.001 0.001 0.001 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 350C3 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.002 0.000 MACT source (FF, A/C=10.0)PM INC 350C9 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.000 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 350C5 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.001 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 350C4 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.001 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.001 0.002 0.001 MACT source (FF, A/C=3.0)PM INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.001 0.002 0.000 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 0.001 0.001 0.000 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.7)PM INC 350C8 WHB/HE/FF 0.001 0.001 0.001 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 349C3 QC/FF/QC/PT 0.001 0.001 0.001 MACT source (FF, A/C=3)PM INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 0.001 0.002 0.001 MACT source (FF, A/C=?)PM INC 349C2 QC/FF/QC/PT 0.001 0.002 0.001 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.001 0.002 0.001 MACT source (VS)PM INC 349C4 QC/FF/QC/PT 0.001 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)PM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 0.001 0.002 0.000 MACT source (VS)PM INC 222C5 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.001 0.003 0.001 MACT source (ESP)PM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 0.001 0.002 0.001 MACT source (FF)PM INC 726C2 QC/CS/DM/VS 0.001 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (VS)PM INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 0.001 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM INC 354C3 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.001 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (VS/IWS)PM INC 333C2 SD/FF 0.001 0.003 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=9.9)PM INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM 0.001 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (VS)PM INC 209C7 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.002 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 350C1 WHB/HE/FF 0.002 0.003 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=9.2)PM INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.002 0.002 0.002 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 0.002 0.003 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.6)PM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.002 0.002 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 0.002 0.003 0.001 In: MACT EU (ET VS)TABLE A-3. PM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) APCSType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min new actPM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 0.002 0.002 0.002 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 0.002 0.003 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.7)PM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.002 0.003 0.001 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.002 0.003 0.001 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 333C1 SD/FF 0.002 0.005 0.000 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=9.7)PM INC 703C2 WHB 0.002 0.003 0.001 Out: Not MACTPM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.003 0.003 0.003 Out: HW not burnedPM INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.003 0.003 0.002 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 209C4 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.003 0.004 0.000 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.0)PM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 0.003 0.005 0.001 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.003 0.004 0.002 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 339C1 AT/PT/RJS/ESP 0.003 0.003 0.002 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 0.003 0.003 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=7.6)PM INC 714C4 WS 0.003 0.004 0.003 Out: Not MACTPM INC 904C2 ? 0.003 0.004 0.003 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 222C7 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.003 0.006 0.002 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 726C1 QC/CS/DM/VS 0.004 0.004 0.003 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 703C1 WHB 0.004 0.004 0.003 Out: Not MACTPM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.004 0.005 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.004 0.004 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 0.004 0.006 0.002 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 500C2 QC/VS/KOV/DM 0.004 0.005 0.002 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 914C1 ? 0.004 0.004 0.004 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 351C2 GC/C/FF 0.004 0.005 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.8)PM INC 209C8 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.005 0.008 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 600C2 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 0.005 0.006 0.004 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 0.005 0.006 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 349C1 QC/FF/QC/PT 0.005 0.006 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.1)PM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 0.005 0.007 0.004 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 351C1 GC/C/FF 0.005 0.007 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)PM INC 714C3 WS 0.006 0.006 0.005 Out: Not MACTPM INC 400C1 SD/FF 0.006 0.008 0.005 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 0.006 0.007 0.006 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 209C5 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.007 0.009 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)TABLE A-3. PM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) APCSType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min new actPM INC 210C2 FF/S 0.007 0.013 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.5)PM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 0.007 0.009 0.005 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 209C3 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.008 0.012 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 331C1 PT/IWS 0.008 0.010 0.007 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 0.008 0.011 0.005 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 210C1 FF/S 0.008 0.018 0.002 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.4)PM INC 211C1 FF/S 0.009 0.011 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=4.1)PM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 0.009 0.013 0.006 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=7.1)PM INC 714C2 WS 0.009 0.011 0.008 Out: Not MACTPM INC 600C1 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 0.010 0.012 0.008 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 727C1 GC/C/FF 0.010 0.012 0.009 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.2)PM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.010 0.012 0.009 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 808C2 QT/PBS/ESP 0.011 0.018 0.007 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 209C6 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 0.011 0.017 0.005 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.8)PM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.011 0.015 0.004 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 0.011 0.013 0.010 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.012 0.013 0.008 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 351C3 GC/C/FF 0.012 0.015 0.008 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.5)PM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.012 0.013 0.012 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 0.013 0.013 0.012 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 350C7 WHB/HE/FF 0.013 0.014 0.012 Out: APCS bypassedPM INC 904C1 ? 0.013 0.015 0.011 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 0.013 0.019 0.003 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 324C3 ? 0.014 0.037 0.004 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 351C4 GC/C/FF 0.014 0.015 0.013 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.3)PM INC 708C3 WS/ESP 0.014 0.017 0.012 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 359C1 WHB/FF/S 0.014 0.035 0.006 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.5)PM INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 0.014 0.016 0.012 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 0.015 0.018 0.013 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 0.015 0.020 0.011 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 707C3 QT/WS 0.015 0.020 0.010 Out: Not MACTPM INC 704C1 NONE 0.015 0.020 0.011 Out: Not MACTPM INC 708C1 WS/ESP 0.016 0.018 0.012 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 904C3 ? 0.016 0.028 0.010 Out: Unknown APCSTABLE A-3. PM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) APCSType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min new actPM INC 710C1 QT/OS/C/S 0.017 0.018 0.015 Out: Not MACTPM INC 214C1 IWS 0.017 0.024 0.009 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.017 0.020 0.015 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 229C4 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.018 0.019 0.016 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 324C1 ? 0.018 0.071 0.004 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 214C3 IWS 0.019 0.020 0.018 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 359C2 WHB/FF/S 0.019 0.043 0.006 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.7)PM INC 216C7 HES/WS 0.020 0.029 0.016 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 504C1 VS/C 0.021 0.039 0.013 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 0.021 0.024 0.019 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 710C2 QT/OS/C/S 0.021 0.022 0.021 Out: Not MACTPM INC 725C1 WS/QT 0.022 0.029 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM INC 711C1 C/VS/AS 0.022 0.029 0.018 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 704C2 NONE 0.022 0.028 0.014 Out: Not MACTPM INC 712C2 NONE 0.022 0.027 0.020 Out: Not MACTPM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.022 0.026 0.019 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 702A3 QT/S/C 0.022 0.023 0.021 Out: Not MACTPM INC 212C1 FF/S 0.022 0.024 0.020 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=4.1)PM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 0.023 0.026 0.016 Out: Not MACTPM INC 324C2 ? 0.023 0.071 0.005 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 915C3 QC/VS/C 0.024 0.037 0.015 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 357C1 QC/VS/PT/IWS 0.025 0.033 0.018 In: MACT EU (VS/IWS)PM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.026 0.026 0.025 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 354C4 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 0.026 0.037 0.017 In: MACT EU (VS/IWS)PM INC 358C2 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.026 0.029 0.025 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 701C2 VS/PT 0.026 0.027 0.024 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 359C3 WHB/FF/S 0.026 0.066 0.006 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.7)PM INC 358C4 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.027 0.027 0.026 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 216C6 HES/WS 0.027 0.033 0.022 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 808C1 QT/PBS/ESP 0.027 0.060 0.009 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 0.028 0.032 0.025 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.5)PM INC 214C2 IWS 0.028 0.034 0.017 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 216C1 HES/WS 0.028 0.029 0.026 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.028 0.039 0.022 In: MACT EU (ET VS)TABLE A-3. PM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) APCSType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min new actPM INC 706C3 QT/HS/C 0.028 0.034 0.025 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 707C7 QT/WS 0.029 0.030 0.026 Out: Not MACTPM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 0.029 0.035 0.024 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.2)PM INC 324C4 ? 0.029 0.115 0.005 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscf, Unknown APCSPM INC 700C2 SD/RJS/VS/WS 0.030 0.033 0.028 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 806C2 C/VS 0.031 0.031 0.030 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 329C1 PT/IWS 0.031 0.037 0.027 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0.031 0.035 0.028 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 711C2 C/VS/AS 0.031 0.049 0.022 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 356C1 QC/AS/FN/S/DM 0.032 0.035 0.031 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 707A2 QT/WS 0.033 0.038 0.028 Out: Not MACTPM INC 358C1 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.033 0.036 0.031 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 216C5 HES/WS 0.033 0.041 0.027 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 701C1 VS/PT 0.033 0.038 0.028 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 707C2 QT/WS 0.034 0.036 0.030 Out: Not MACTPM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.034 0.049 0.022 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 714C5 WS 0.035 0.040 0.028 Out: Not MACTPM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 0.036 0.040 0.033 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 906C5 QT/PT 0.036 0.043 0.029 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C4 QT/WS 0.037 0.038 0.036 Out: Not MACTPM INC 784C1 NONE 0.037 0.039 0.034 Out: Not MACTPM INC 712C1 NONE 0.038 0.067 0.023 Out: Not MACTPM INC 706C1 QT/HS/C 0.038 0.040 0.034 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 714C1 WS 0.038 0.044 0.032 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C1 QT/WS 0.038 0.049 0.026 Out: Not MACTPM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0.038 0.055 0.024 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 702A2 QT/S/C 0.042 0.051 0.028 Out: Not MACTPM INC 710C3 QT/OS/C/S 0.042 0.044 0.038 Out: Not MACTPM INC 358C3 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 0.043 0.045 0.041 In: MACT EU (VS)PM INC 711C3 C/VS/AS 0.043 0.045 0.039 In: MACT EU (VS)PM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0.043 0.100 0.013 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 728C1 QT/PT/VS 0.044 0.045 0.043 In: MACT EU (VS)PM INC 784C2 NONE 0.044 0.047 0.042 Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C4 HES/WS 0.044 0.051 0.032 In: MACT EU (ET VS)TABLE A-3. PM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) APCSType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min new actPM INC 707C8 QT/WS 0.045 0.047 0.043 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707A1 QT/WS 0.046 0.049 0.043 Out: Not MACTPM INC 353C3 QC/VS/DM/ESP 0.047 0.049 0.045 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 702A1 QT/S/C 0.047 0.053 0.043 Out: Not MACTPM INC 708C2 WS/ESP 0.049 0.069 0.033 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 709C1 NONE 0.051 0.106 0.014 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 805C1 QT/QS/VS/ES/PBS 0.054 0.058 0.049 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 806C1 C/VS 0.056 0.064 0.044 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 0.057 0.061 0.053 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 0.058 0.075 0.040 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 915C2 QC/VS/C 0.058 0.062 0.052 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 0.059 0.063 0.057 Out: Not MACTPM INC 706C2 QT/HS/C 0.062 0.066 0.057 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 0.062 0.107 0.037 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 713C1 VS/PT 0.065 0.068 0.059 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 825C1 CCS/QC/ESP 0.065 0.080 0.030 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C1 QT/PT 0.066 0.093 0.048 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 701C3 VS/PT 0.069 0.078 0.060 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 915C4 QC/VS/C 0.071 0.076 0.066 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 702C7 QT/S/C 0.072 0.107 0.041 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C3 QT/PT 0.072 0.075 0.068 Out: Not MACTPM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C 0.076 0.078 0.074 In: MACT EU (ET VS)PM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 0.077 0.095 0.057 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C4 QT/PT 0.087 0.094 0.076 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C2 QT/PT 0.089 0.114 0.076 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 702C6 QT/S/C 0.090 0.104 0.081 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 702C8 QT/S/C 0.109 0.132 0.081 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 332C1 WS 0.114 0.133 0.097 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 727C2 GC/C/FF 0.157 0.216 0.100 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 702C9 QT/S/C 0.188 0.189 0.186 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 707C9 QT/WS 1.901 5.590 0.029 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfTABLE A-4. PM, CEMENT KILNS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) APCSType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM CK 315C2 FF 0.001 0.001 0.000 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.8)PM CK 315C1 FF 0.001 0.001 0.001 Source already in MACT poolPM CK 317C3 FF 0.002 0.004 0.001 Out: HW not burnedPM CK 317C1 FF 0.002 0.003 0.002 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.3)PM CK 317C2 FF 0.003 0.004 0.003 Source already in MACT poolPM CK 320C1 FF 0.003 0.006 0.001 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.3)PM CK 404C2 ESP 0.004 0.005 0.004 MACT source (ESP, SCA=580)PM CK 404C1 ESP 0.007 0.018 0.004 Source already in MACT poolPM CK 318C2 ESP 0.010 0.011 0.008 MACT source (ESP, SCA=434)PM CK 30151 FF 0.011 0.017 0.003 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)PM CK 316C1 FF 0.011 0.012 0.010 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM CK 316C2 FF 0.012 0.013 0.012 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM CK 200C1 FF 0.014 0.016 0.011 Out: MACT (FF), High A/C (4)PM CK 203C1 ESP 0.014 0.017 0.011 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (216)PM CK 208C1 ESP 0.014 0.015 0.012 In: MACT EU (ESP)PM CK 208C2 ESP 0.016 0.025 0.011 In: MACT EU (ESP)PM CK 306C1 MC/FF 0.016 0.023 0.012 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)PM CK 207C2 MC/ESP 0.018 0.024 0.010 In: MACT EU (ESP)PM CK 406C1 ESP 0.019 0.026 0.015 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (339)PM CK 322C1 ESP 0.019 0.033 0.011 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (370)PM CK 308C1 ESP 0.021 0.024 0.016 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=858)PM CK 323C1 ESP 0.022 0.033 0.005 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (238)PM CK 202C1 FF 0.022 0.025 0.020 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.9)PM CK 309C2 MC/ESP 0.023 0.035 0.013 In: MACT EU (ESP)PM CK 206C1 ESP 0.023 0.029 0.015 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=500)PM CK 303C1 QC/FF 0.023 0.025 0.021 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.2)PM CK 335C1 ESP 0.023 0.033 0.017 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (420)PM CK 303C2 QC/FF 0.024 0.026 0.023 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.3)PM CK 309C1 MC/ESP 0.026 0.029 0.022 In: MACT EU (ESP)PM CK 207C1 MC/ESP 0.028 0.032 0.026 In: MACT EU (ESP)PM CK 204C1 ESP 0.028 0.032 0.024 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (350)PM CK 202C2 FF 0.031 0.042 0.025 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.9)PM CK 403C2 ESP 0.031 0.039 0.016 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (230)PM CK 402C1 ESP 0.033 0.049 0.022 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (227)TABLE A-4. PM, CEMENT KILNS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) APCSType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM CK 302C1 ESP 0.034 0.060 0.020 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (245)PM CK 405C1 ESP 0.035 0.065 0.016 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=460)PM CK 403C1 ESP 0.035 0.049 0.025 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (520)PM CK 201C1 FF 0.036 0.109 0.008 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 319C1 ESP 0.037 0.040 0.034 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=1100)PM CK 30141 FF 0.039 0.053 0.029 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM CK 30143 FF 0.041 0.046 0.031 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=0.9)PM CK 401C4 ESP 0.041 0.051 0.030 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (243)PM CK 401C1 ESP 0.048 0.061 0.038 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (243)PM CK 401C3 ESP 0.049 0.053 0.042 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (243)PM CK 30153 FF 0.050 0.078 0.004 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.6)PM CK 205C1 ESP 0.050 0.058 0.045 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=570)PM CK 304C1 ESP 0.057 0.064 0.049 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (350)PM CK 305C1 ESP 0.064 0.072 0.053 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (342)PM CK 300C1 ESP 0.071 0.083 0.057 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 305C3 ESP 0.074 0.075 0.072 Out: MACT (ESP), Low SCA (342)PM CK 401C5 ESP 0.077 0.105 0.063 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 305C2 ESP 0.080 0.086 0.075 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 402C5 ESP 0.085 0.119 0.064 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 321C1 ESP 0.210 0.490 0.035 Out: > 0.08 gr/dscfTABLE A-5. PM, LWAKs, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (gr/dscf) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinPM LWAK 225C1 FF 0.000 0.001 0.000 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5)PM LWAK 227C1 FF 0.001 0.002 0.001 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.8)PM LWAK 226C1 FF 0.002 0.004 0.001 Source already in MACT poolPM LWAK 223C1 FF 0.004 0.008 0.002 Source already in MACT poolPM LWAK 224C1 FF 0.005 0.009 0.002 Source already in MACT poolPM LWAK 311C1 FF 0.006 0.007 0.004 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.9)PM LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 0.007 0.008 0.006 MACT source (FF/VS, A/C=4)PM LWAK 313C1 FF 0.007 0.008 0.006 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.4)PM LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 0.008 0.012 0.006 In: MACT EU (FF/VS)PM LWAK 336C1 FF 0.009 0.011 0.007 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM LWAK 312C1 FF 0.010 0.018 0.005 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)PM LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 0.010 0.016 0.006 In: MACT EU (FF/VS)PM LWAK 310C1 FF 0.018 0.026 0.013 Out: MACT (FF), High A/CPM LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 0.022 0.037 0.013 In: MACT EU (FF/VS)PM LWAK 314C1 FF 0.022 0.029 0.012 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4)TABLE A-6. MERCURY, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 51.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 99.90 MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 5.1e1)Mercury INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 35.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 99.70 Source already in MACT poolMercury INC 216C7 HES/WS 0.3 0.3 0.2 Out: No MTECMercury INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 0.4 0.7 0.2 Out: No MTECMercury INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.5 0.5 0.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 5.1 0.8 1.0 0.6 84.95 MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 5.1e0)Mercury INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 18.5 0.9 1.0 0.9 94.93 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.9e1)Mercury INC 216C5 HES/WS 1.0 1.7 0.1 Out: No MTECMercury INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 1.2 1.5 0.8 Out: No MTECMercury INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 8.6 1.3 2.2 0.9 84.26 MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 9e1)Mercury INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1861.7 1.4 3.4 0.6 99.92 MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 1.8e3)Mercury INC 725C1 WS/QT 1.7 1.8 1.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 2.5 5.3 1.1 Out: No MTECMercury INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 234.1 2.5 2.6 2.5 98.91 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0.1 2.8 6.1 0.4 -4963.30 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 106.1 2.9 3.4 2.3 97.29 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 253.8 3.1 4.5 0.3 98.76 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 3.4 3.4 3.4 Out: No MTECMercury INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 37.8 4.0 6.4 1.8 89.43 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 4.1 11.3 1.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 8.5 4.3 5.8 1.9 48.99 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 0.1 4.6 4.7 4.5 -6107.24 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 9.4 4.7 6.0 3.6 50.34 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 0.7 5.3 6.8 3.4 -638.81 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 0.2 5.8 8.3 3.2 -2980.36 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 6.2 7.7 4.4 Out: No MTECMercury INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 6.5 7.9 5.4 Out: No MTECMercury INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 182.6 7.6 9.4 5.7 95.85 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 296.9 9.9 16.0 7.3 96.68 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 14.3 10.7 20.1 1.2 24.89 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 135.7 12.3 13.9 10.1 90.92 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 16.1 22.4 12.0 Out: No MTECMercury INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 1.8 17.9 18.4 17.5 -894.48 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 15.4 19.2 34.7 7.3 -24.26 In: MACT EU (WS)Page 1TABLE A-6. MERCURY, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 9.3 19.3 30.1 3.8 -107.56 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC 400C1 SD/FF 27680.5 19.4 26.4 15.7 99.93 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 52.1 25.2 43.2 11.4 51.72 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 95.8 27.1 30.3 22.0 71.67 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 30.2 27.2 50.0 10.7 9.64 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 27.7 43.3 8.2 Out: No MTECMercury INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 263.1 30.1 44.8 19.8 88.56 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 214C3 IWS 3357.9 31.7 46.5 22.5 99.06 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 331C1 PT/IWS 38.8 52.3 18.6 Out: No MTECMercury INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 42.9 94.0 4.6 Out: No MTECMercury INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 60.1 44.4 65.6 8.4 26.17 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/M (CO - 325C6/5)Mercury INC 216C6 HES/WS 44.6 106.3 11.9 Out: No MTECMercury INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 32.3 47.7 54.4 42.1 -47.88 In: MACT EU (WS)Mercury INC 214C2 IWS 70348.9 48.8 90.3 19.2 99.93 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 89.6 103.3 75.9 Out: No MTECMercury INC 806C2 C/VS 117.8 146.2 84.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 806C1 C/VS 172.6 195.5 129.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS 177.8 517.2 6.6 Out: No MTECMercury INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 69.7 188.1 278.8 146.5 -170.11 Out: MACT (FC), MB problemMercury INC 216C3 HES/WS 261.0 679.9 37.5 Out: No MTECMercury INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 75.6 394.5 570.1 285.4 -421.63 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC 214C1 IWS 481.6 784.0 128.8 Out: No MTECMercury INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 123.3 1121.5 2396.7 154.1 -809.79 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemMercury INC 504C1 VS/C 2146.1 1322.7 2342.9 77.8 38.37 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECMercury INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 477.4 1360.7 2067.9 563.9 -185.04 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemPage 2TABLE A-7. MERCURY, CEMENT KILNS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury CK 303C1 QC/FF034398.42 Out: HW not burnedMercury CK 404C1 ESP 28 4 7 2 89.73 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 2.8e1)Mercury CK 305C3 ESP 129872 5 7 4 100.00 Out: MB problemMercury CK 201C1 FF 5 15 1 Out: No MTECMercury CK 203C1 ESP 10 6 6 6 85.58 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.1e1)Mercury CK 406C1 ESP 108 8 16 5 93.43 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.1e2)Mercury CK 200C1 FF 11 21 3 Out: No MTECMercury CK 305C1 ESP 29 16 18 13 92.88 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 2.9e1)Mercury CK 207C1 MC/ESP 6 17 22 13 84.16 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 6e0)Mercury CK 206C1 ESP 19 17 23 13 99.92 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 204C1 ESP 5 19 24 15 82.06 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 402C1 ESP 118 19 38 8 99.81 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 208C1 ESP 6 20 25 12 81.30 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 202C2 FF 7 20 22 18 64.43 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 405C1 ESP 153 21 26 12 87.72 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 205C1 ESP 10 30 37 23 48.91 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 401C5 ESP 47 36 50 19 37.73 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 304C1 ESP 9 42 52 28 56.53 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 309C1 MC/ESP 88 43 54 36 71.80 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 402C4 ESP 33 51 70 39 -12.77 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 319C1 ESP 5 56 59 53 25.49 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 335C1 ESP 25813 60 100 39 99.77 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 303C3 QC/FF 53 92 172 48 75.75 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury CK 30152 FF 240 106 143 117 84.52 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 30142 FF 240 128 139 69 81.27 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 401C1 ESP 545 148 382 44 73.36 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury CK 403C1 ESP 62 1014 1598 719 ###### Out: MB problem, DL measurementMercury CK 306C1 MC/FF 3339 2988 4574 1048 22.11 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECPage 1TABLE A-8. MERCURY, LWAKs, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Mercury LWAK 313C1 FF 17 0 1 0 99.24 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.7e1)Mercury LWAK 225C1 FF 3 5 6 3 67.38 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 2.9e0)Mercury LWAK 312C1 FF 12 9 10 8 79.49 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.2e1)Mercury LWAK 310C1 FF 11 15 20 11 60.35 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.1e1)Mercury LWAK 311C1 FF 24 15 19 11 73.76 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 2.4e1)Mercury LWAK 224C1 FF 10 16 19 14 44.80 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK 227C1 FF 10 17 19 16 73.24 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK 314C1 FF 63 22 25 16 80.74 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK 223C1 FF 17 32 34 30 30.66 In: MACT EU (FC)Mercury LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 2328 422 456 324 82.57 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 1991 472 511 431 77.15 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 2212 493 511 472 78.50 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECMercury LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 2142 561 760 403 74.69 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECPage 1TABLE A-9. SVM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM INC 325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1 2 1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 712C1 NONE 0 2 2 2 Out: MB Problem, Sub. > 75%SVM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 48776 3 3 2 MACT source (VS/IWS w/ MTEC of 4.9e4) (FF as ET)SVM INC 712C2 NONE 1 3 4 2 Out: MB Problem, Sub. > 75%SVM INC 222C5 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 3 6 2 Out: No MTECSVM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 168 4 5 2 MACT source (VS w/ MTEC of 1.7e2) (Any PM control as ET)SVM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 4 4 4 Out: No MTECSVM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 5795 6 7 4 MACT source (ESP w/ MTEC of 5.8e3)SVM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 188533 7 8 6 MACT source (FF/VS w/ MTEC of 1.9e5)SVM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 495 10 11 10 MACT source (FF w/ MTEC of 5.0e2)SVM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 129450 11 19 6 In: MACT EU (FF)SVM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 11 12 9 Out: No MTECSVM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 12 13 9 Out: No MTECSVM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 13 20 8 Out: No MTECSVM INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 4666 13 23 3 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 3786 13 20 9 In: MACT EU (ESP)SVM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 14 14 14 Out: No MTECSVM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 403 17 24 10 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 21 30 13 Out: No MTECSVM INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 2077 22 31 9 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 904 23 54 7 In: MACT EU (ET ESP)SVM INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 3798 23 55 7 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 24 39 16 Out: No MTECSVM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 240 24 25 23 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 11148 25 37 16 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 89 25 27 23 In: MACT EU (ET VS)SVM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1 27 31 23 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problem, Sub. > 85%, DL measurementSVM INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 28 31 24 Out: No MTECSVM INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 1290 29 39 23 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 31 34 28 Out: No MTECSVM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 125 35 42 25 In: MACT EU (ET VS)SVM INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 10366 37 57 21 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 725C1 WS/QT 37 44 29 Out: No MTECSVM INC 349C3 QC/FF/QC/PT 532412 39 44 37 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECTABLE A-9. SVM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 375 42 63 14 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 443 44 71 23 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 504C1 VS/C 14632 44 75 24 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 48240 56 77 40 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 10716 58 140 13 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1 64 71 57 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB ProblemSVM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 0 71 76 66 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problem, Sub. > 91%, DL measurementSVM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 89 114 63 Out: No MTECSVM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 4884 91 163 54 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (325C7)SVM INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 45856 94 148 63 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 163 101 122 78 In: MACT EU (VS)SVM INC 216C3 HES/WS 103 178 58 Out: No MTECSVM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 0 116 163 66 Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 214C1 IWS 201 384 75 Out: No MTECSVM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 210 335 128 Out: No MTECSVM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 5805 225 472 91 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (325C7)SVM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 227 263 175 Out: No MTECSVM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 358 244 253 235 Out: Not MACTSVM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 4360 245 366 115 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (325C7)SVM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 174720 262 370 206 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 153 301 484 199 Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 230683 312 429 233 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 332 522 191 Out: No MTECSVM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 108 418 494 324 Out: Not MACT, MB problemSVM INC 806C2 C/VS 461 496 391 Out: No MTECSVM INC 324C1 ? 537 1532 95 Out: No MTECSVM INC 806C1 C/VS 591 726 444 Out: No MTECSVM INC 400C1 SD/FF 2538985 656 813 407 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 214C2 IWS 151644 689 905 328 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 302756 721 722 719 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 216C7 HES/WS 826 1076 404 Out: No MTECSVM INC 324C4 ? 838 2108 121 Out: No MTECSVM INC 809C1 VS 20803 865 991 766 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 810C1 Q/VS/PBS 56371 882 1095 522 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECTABLE A-9. SVM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 68334 911 1220 694 In: MACT EU (FF)SVM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 993 1402 547 Out: No MTECSVM INC 214C3 IWS 343542 1000 1322 446 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 216C5 HES/WS 1021 1279 778 Out: No MTECSVM INC 216C6 HES/WS 1045 1279 771 Out: No MTECSVM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C 1284 1582 1043 Out: No MTECSVM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 1509 2247 1016 Out: No MTECSVM INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 566 1706 2575 952 Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 810C2 Q/VS/PBS 653523 1777 2041 1399 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 324C2 ? 3040 18083 158 Out: No MTECSVM INC 331C1 PT/IWS 3465 4705 1992 Out: No MTECSVM INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 122029 7964 13516 3413 Out: MACT (WS/ESP), High MTECSVM INC 324C3 ? 8262 53289 152 Out: No MTECSVM INC 809C2 VS 205717 19769 23051 16802 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 222057 29350 37804 24633 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 905C1 QT/VS/AS/CS 13398 29761 39956 23066 Out: MACT (VS), MB problemTABLE A-10. SVM, CEMENT KILNS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM CK 320C1 FF 33453 4 7 2 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.1, w/ MTEC of 3.6e4)SVM CK 316C2 FF 65771 6 8 4 Source already in MACT poolSVM CK 316C1 FF 83491 6 7 6 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.2, w/ MTEC of 8.4e4)SVM CK 30142 FF 76266 9 12 6 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.3, w/ MTEC of 7.6e4)SVM CK 321C1 ESP 207029 11 22 5 MACT source (ESP, SCA=420, w/ MTEC of 2.1e5)SVM CK 303C1 QC/FF 13000 13 14 12 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.2, w/ MTEC of 1.3e4)SVM CK 30152 FF 76266 15 29 4 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.6)SVM CK 306C1 MC/FF 48726 17 24 10 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)SVM CK 315C2 FF 157511 18 27 14 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)SVM CK 315C1 FF 163256 21 34 14 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.6)SVM CK 317C1 FF 42728 28 30 27 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.3)SVM CK 317C3 FF 0 29 29 29 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)SVM CK 317C2 FF 42189 29 30 28 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.1)SVM CK 403C1 ESP 127283 30 34 25 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230)SVM CK 303C3 QC/FF 26096 33 38 22 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)SVM CK 404C1 ESP 60982 57 68 49 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230)SVM CK 200C1 FF 26905 62 71 41 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4), High A/CSVM CK 208C2 ESP 15158 87 117 61 In: MACT EU (ESP)SVM CK 308C1 ESP 27457 93 107 83 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=858)SVM CK 208C1 ESP 30942 98 141 73 In: MACT EU (ESP)SVM CK 202C2 FF 185075 109 114 99 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)SVM CK 318C2 ESP 113263 140 164 127 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=434)SVM CK 322C1 ESP 137960 151 169 135 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=370)SVM CK 207C2 MC/ESP 49680 258 636 80 In: MACT EU (ESP)SVM CK 206C1 ESP 164386 273 318 230 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=504)SVM CK 401C1 ESP 74007 382 704 219 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=240)SVM CK 204C1 ESP 212177 505 781 262 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=350)SVM CK 207C1 MC/ESP 82353 507 726 312 In: MACT EU (ESP)SVM CK 203C1 ESP 158786 528 613 421 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=216)SVM CK 309C1 MC/ESP 81002 543 748 299 In: MACT EU (ESP)SVM CK 304C1 ESP 140000 599 646 535 In: MACT EU (ESP)SVM CK 406C1 ESP 121721 662 932 437 Out: MACT (ESP), DL measurementSVM CK 319C1 ESP 22000 678 1148 261 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=1100)SVM CK 335C1 ESP 75279 752 933 629 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=420)TABLE A-10. SVM, CEMENT KILNS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM CK 402C1 ESP 207994 815 1313 381 Out: MACT (ESP), High MTEC, DL measurementSVM CK 305C3 ESP 67136 897 1154 631 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=342)SVM CK 201C1 FF 172743 924 3554 44 In: MACT EU (FF)SVM CK 323C1 ESP 145718 973 1340 713 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=238)SVM CK 205C1 ESP 139789 1169 1512 560 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=350)SVM CK 405C1 ESP 77813 1170 1912 896 Out: MACT (ESP, DL measurement)SVM CK 305C1 ESP 152835 1322 1698 1022 Out: MACT (ESP), DL measurementSVM CK 302C1 ESP 369251 1529 3030 677 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=245), High MTECSVM CK 401C5 ESP 148756 1966 4237 623 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=245)SVM CK 300C2 ESP 455411 2345 4865 702 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=360)SVM CK 402C4 ESP 45400 6047 6651 5512 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=227)TABLE A-11. SVM, LWAKs, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinSVM LWAK 225C1 FF 270004 1 1 1 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5, w/ MTEC of 2.7e5)SVM LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 53860 4 6 3 Source already in MACT poolSVM LWAK 224C1 FF 14691 4 5 3 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5, w/ MTEC of 1.5e4)SVM LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 56984 4 7 2 MACT source (FF/VS, A/C = 4.4, w/ MTEC of 5.7e4)SVM LWAK 223C1 FF 731989 5 6 4 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.2, w/ MTEC of 7.3e5)SVM LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 51156 7 12 5 Source already in MACT poolSVM LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 55659 10 15 7 Source already in MACT poolSVM LWAK 227C1 FF 23904 31 60 12 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.8, w/ MTEC of 2.4e4)SVM LWAK 312C1 FF 457634 403 622 163 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)SVM LWAK 310C1 FF 289 495 884 265 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=3.6), MB problem (low SRE)SVM LWAK 311C1 FF 374691 516 923 179 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.9)SVM LWAK 313C1 FF 687282 663 1290 250 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4)SVM LWAK 314C1 FF 686565 1667 1835 1514 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4)TABLE A-12. LVM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm)CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.0E+03 4 4 3 MACT source (VS w/ MTEC of 1.0e3) (Any PM control as ET)LVM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 6.2E+03 4 5 3 MACT source (IWS w/ MTEC of 6.2e3)LVM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 4 7 2 Out: No MTECLVM INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM 4 5 4 Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C1 GC/C/FF 6 9 5 Out: No MTECLVM INC 806C2 C/VS 7 10 6 Out: No MTECLVM INC 325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS 7 8 6 Out: No MTECLVM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 7 9 5 Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C2 GC/C/FF 8 9 4 Out: No MTECLVM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 1.2E+03 8 8 8 MACT source (FF w/ MTEC of 1.2e3)LVM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 8 8 8 Out: No MTECLVM INC 806C1 C/VS 9 11 7 Out: No MTECLVM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 1.4E+03 10 10 9 MACT source (VS/PT w/ MTEC of 1.4e3)LVM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 2.7E+04 10 10 10 MACT source (VS/IWS w/ MTEC of 2.7e4)LVM INC 712C2 NONE 2.7E+00 11 14 8 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 7.3E+02 11 18 8 In: MACT EU (FF)LVM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 2.8E+04 11 12 10 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 5.7E+03 13 14 11 In: MACT EU (IWS)LVM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 2.5E+05 14 19 10 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 15 30 5 Out: No MTECLVM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 17 17 17 Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C3 GC/C/FF 17 19 15 Out: No MTECLVM INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 1.0E+03 18 29 9 In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 7.6E+03 20 22 18 In: MACT EU (FF ET)LVM INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 4.6E+03 23 34 16 In: MACT EU (FF ET)LVM INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 1.3E+04 28 41 7 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 6.5E-01 28 38 22 Out: MACT (VS), MB problemLVM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 29 34 19 Out: No MTECLVM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 31 60 11 Out: No MTECLVM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 2.2E+05 31 38 23 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 7.3E+03 34 38 32 In: MACT EU (FF ET)LVM INC 214C3 IWS 8.8E+04 34 51 20 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 6.7E+04 38 42 32 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 5.0E+01 40 43 37 Out: Not MACTTABLE A-12. LVM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm)CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 7.0E+02 41 48 37 In: MACT EU (VS ET)LVM INC 216C6 HES/WS 47 53 36 Out: No MTECLVM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 3.2E+03 48 64 39 In: MACT EU (IWS)LVM INC 331C1 PT/IWS 50 64 31 Out: No MTECLVM INC 725C1 WS/QT 51 62 43 Out: No MTECLVM INC 216C5 HES/WS 51 59 38 Out: No MTECLVM INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 1.2E+02 53 77 38 In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 2.7E+05 56 65 50 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 712C1 NONE 1.4E+00 56 103 30 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 214C2 IWS 5.7E+04 59 87 24 Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.4E+03 60 79 51 In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 1.2E+01 63 67 55 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 5.8E+01 65 85 34 Out: MACT (VS), MB problemLVM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 8.0E+02 66 81 51 In: MACT EU (VS ET)LVM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 2.5E+02 68 72 64 In: MACT EU (VS ET)LVM INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 72 81 63 Out: No MTECLVM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 5.9E+02 77 80 75 In: MACT EU (VS ET)LVM INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 97 148 64 Out: No MTECLVM INC 324C1 ? 98 164 53 Out: No MTECLVM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 3.9E+03 101 212 27 In: MACT EU (IWS)LVM INC 400C1 SD/FF 6.2E+05 102 126 70 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 324C2 ? 112 208 42 Out: No MTECLVM INC 324C3 ? 115 176 49 Out: No MTECLVM INC 216C7 HES/WS 121 135 97 Out: No MTECLVM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 8.6E+03 122 146 109 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 9.8E+03 135 162 94 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 5.0E+02 145 333 45 In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 3.5E+04 147 422 9 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 504C1 VS/C 7.4E+04 157 300 19 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 905C1 QT/VS/AS/CS 6.8E+03 181 197 162 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 2.4E+05 193 281 55 Out: Not MACTLVM INC 324C4 ? 194 527 47 Out: No MTECLVM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 198 335 129 Out: No MTECLVM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 3.7E+05 209 318 92 Out: Not MACTTABLE A-12. LVM, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm)CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 5.4E+05 246 308 175 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 4.2E+03 261 431 167 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problemLVM INC 216C3 HES/WS 269 362 157 Out: No MTECLVM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 8.0E+02 301 491 199 Out: MACT (VS), MB problemLVM INC 810C1 Q/VS/PBS 5.5E+04 321 457 146 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 214C1 IWS 339 460 198 Out: No MTECLVM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 353 960 38 Out: No MTECLVM INC 809C1 VS 5.6E+04 397 469 353 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 6.8E+03 451 566 205 In: MACT EU (ET IWS)LVM INC 915C4 QC/VS/C 612 898 446 Out: No MTECLVM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 1.9E+05 634 752 548 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 6.9E+03 721 789 668 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 2.2E+04 820 2101 204 In: MACT EU (ET IWS)LVM INC 810C2 Q/VS/PBS 2.3E+06 836 921 758 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C 873 1037 728 Out: No MTECLVM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 1064 1855 345 Out: No MTECLVM INC 809C2 VS 1.3E+06 7224 7976 6552 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 10971 13042 8641 Out: No MTECLVM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 132678 157456 96750 Out: No MTECTABLE A-13. LVM, CEMENT KILNS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM CK 320C1 FF 25210 4 5 3 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.3, w/ MTEC of 2.5e4)LVM CK 316C2 FF 44108 5 6 4 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.2, w/ MTEC of 4.4e4)LVM CK 204C1 ESP 143982 6 7 5 MACT source (ESP, SCA=350, w/ MTEC of 1.4e5)LVM CK 308C1 ESP 29513 7 9 5 MACT source (ESP, SCA=860, w/ MTEC of 3e4))LVM CK 206C1 ESP 205763 9 9 8 MACT source (ESP, SCA=504, w/ MTEC of 2e5))LVM CK 315C1 FF 258174 9 12 3 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 309C1 MC/ESP 106203 9 19 5 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 208C1 ESP 15357 10 11 8 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 303C3 QC/FF 25232 10 22 4 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)LVM CK 335C1 ESP 39270 11 11 11 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=420)LVM CK 315C2 FF 247408 11 11 11 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 316C1 FF 65167 11 14 9 In: MACT EU (FF)LVM CK 321C1 ESP 83779 11 24 4 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=419)LVM CK 306C1 MC/FF 231592 13 15 12 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 208C2 ESP 7115 14 26 6 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 30142 FF 23371 16 19 14 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.3)LVM CK 30152 FF 23371 17 22 13 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)LVM CK 205C1 ESP 171391 19 23 13 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=349)LVM CK 318C2 ESP 15678 19 23 16 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=434)LVM CK 305C3 ESP 44058 20 21 20 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=340)LVM CK 317C1 FF 39252 23 25 23 In: MACT EU (FF)LVM CK 317C3 FF 0 23 24 24 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)LVM CK 317C2 FF 35645 24 24 23 In: MACT EU (FF)LVM CK 322C1 ESP 173846 24 29 16 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=370)LVM CK 303C1 QC/FF 5610 25 39 18 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.3)LVM CK 401C5 ESP 15312 27 52 8 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=243)LVM CK 302C1 ESP 264797 27 43 19 Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 202C2 FF 120729 29 30 29 In: MACT EU (FF)LVM CK 203C1 ESP 47698 31 42 25 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=220)LVM CK 403C1 ESP 66049 34 37 32 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)LVM CK 305C1 ESP 86477 38 43 34 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=340), Poor D/O/M (low SCA)LVM CK 402C4 ESP 16212 50 59 40 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)LVM CK 207C2 MC/ESP 15408 55 294 6 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 304C1 ESP 170000 57 102 27 In: MACT EU (ESP)TABLE A-13. LVM, CEMENT KILNS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM CK 207C1 MC/ESP 16590 57 160 9 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 319C1 ESP 15400 60 73 44 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=1153)LVM CK 300C2 ESP 492419 102 197 38 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=365), High MTECLVM CK 323C1 ESP 154346 127 244 62 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=238)LVM CK 404C1 ESP 167319 130 170 97 Out: MACT (ESP), DL measurementLVM CK 402C1 ESP 199783 162 167 155 Out: MACT (ESP), DL measurementLVM CK 401C1 ESP 30735 173 182 162 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)LVM CK 406C1 ESP 105475 184 191 180 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=340), Poor D/O/M (low SCA)LVM CK 405C1 ESP 176599 304 351 267 Out: MACT (ESP), DL measurementLVM CK 200C1 FF 354752 367 451 248 Out: MACT (FF), High MTEC, DL measurementLVM CK 201C1 FF 295437 520 1124 263 Out: MACT (FF), High MTEC, DL measurementTABLE A-14. LVM, LWAKs, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (μg/dscm) CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max MinLVM LWAK 225C1 FF 20344 10 12 9 Source already in MACT poolLVM LWAK 224C1 FF 36730 22 30 17 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5, w/ MTEC of 3.7e4)LVM LWAK 227C1 FF 6911 25 37 18 Source already in MACT poolLVM LWAK 223C1 FF 33422 34 37 30 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.2, w/ MTEC of 3.3e4)LVM LWAK 312C1 FF 46190 37 54 22 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.8, w/ MTEC of 4.6e4)LVM LWAK 311C1 FF 40635 41 52 36 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.9, w/ MTEC of 4.1e4))LVM LWAK 310C1 FF 166 60 88 31 MACT source (FF, A/C=3.6, w/ MTEC of 1.7e2)LVM LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 54494 67 174 30 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.3), High A/CLVM LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 49464 122 164 81 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.4), High A/CLVM LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 52192 145 308 61 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.2), High A/CLVM LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 50080 206 743 13 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4.4), High A/CLVM LWAK 314C1 FF 49552 227 317 162 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4)LVM LWAK 313C1 FF 66835 289 329 245 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.4), High MTECTABLE A-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.1 0.1 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 358C2 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 1.11E+07 0.2 0.2 0.2 100.00 MACT pool (VS/S MTEC of 1.1e7)Tot Cl INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 0.2 0.3 0.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 342C2 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 4.36E+06 0.3 0.3 0.2 99.99 MACT pool (VS/S w/ MTEC of 4.36e6)Tot Cl INC 706C3 QT/HS/C 1.73E+07 0.3 0.3 0.3 100.00 MACT pool (HS w/ MTEC of 1.7e7)Tot Cl INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 0.3 0.3 0.3 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 808C2 QT/PBS/ESP 2.09E+07 0.3 0.7 0.1 100.00 MACT pool (WS w/ MTEC of 2.1e7)Tot Cl INC 706C1 QT/HS/C 1.56E+07 0.4 0.5 0.2 100.00 MACT pool (WS w/ MTEC of 1.6e7)Tot Cl INC 354C3 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1.41E+07 0.4 0.4 0.3 100.00 MACT pool (WS w/ MTEC of 1.4e7)Tot Cl INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 0.4 0.5 0.3 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 337C2 WHB/DA/DI/FF 9.59E+04 0.4 0.5 0.3 99.37 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 728C1 QT/PT/VS 1.83E+07 0.4 0.8 0.0 100.00 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 0.5 1.6 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 600C1 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 3.05E+07 0.6 0.9 0.4 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 707C7 QT/WS 0.6 0.7 0.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 358C3 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.22E+07 0.6 0.8 0.3 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 0.6 0.8 0.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 808C1 QT/PBS/ESP 2.58E+07 0.7 1.1 0.3 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 711C1 C/VS/AS 9.09E+05 0.8 0.9 0.8 99.87 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 0.9 1.0 0.8 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 9.85E+07 0.9 1.1 0.6 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 711C2 C/VS/AS 1.70E+05 0.9 1.0 0.8 99.21 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 706C2 QT/HS/C 1.73E+07 1.0 1.4 0.2 99.99 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 708C3 WS/ESP 5.52E+07 1.0 2.3 0.3 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 214C3 IWS 5.05E+07 1.0 1.3 0.7 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 1.1 2.2 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 711C3 C/VS/AS 7.78E+05 1.1 1.2 1.0 99.80 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 701C2 VS/PT 1.1 2.3 0.4 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM 1.3 1.3 1.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 354C4 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1.3 2.2 0.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 708C2 WS/ESP 6.22E+07 1.4 2.6 0.3 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 500C4 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.54E+07 1.4 2.4 0.9 99.99 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.19E+07 1.4 3.2 0.3 99.98 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 708C1 WS/ESP 8.72E+07 1.4 2.7 0.8 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTABLE A-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 1.6 1.9 1.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 1.7 3.3 0.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 707C1 QT/WS 1.7 3.7 0.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 1.8 3.9 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 359C2 WHB/FF/S 2.24E+07 1.8 2.1 1.5 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 2.62E+06 1.8 2.1 1.5 99.90 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 600C2 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 4.91E+07 1.8 2.4 0.8 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 325C8 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.8 4.9 0.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 2.84E+07 1.9 2.4 0.8 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 1.9 2.2 1.4 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 214C1 IWS 2.42E+07 1.9 2.0 1.8 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.85E+07 2.2 3.6 1.2 99.98 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 359C3 WHB/FF/S 1.60E+07 2.3 4.4 0.7 99.98 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 214C2 IWS 2.82E+07 2.3 3.0 2.0 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 3.33E+06 2.4 2.5 2.1 99.99 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 4.91E+06 2.4 2.7 1.8 99.93 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 209C4 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.13E+07 2.8 3.9 0.6 99.96 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 707A2 QT/WS 7.75E+06 2.9 3.7 2.3 99.94 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 3.2 3.7 2.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.71E+06 3.4 5.0 1.7 99.71 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM 3.5 3.7 3.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 359C1 WHB/FF/S 2.25E+07 3.5 7.0 1.1 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 4.0 4.4 3.3 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 825C1 CCS/QC/ESP 3.45E+07 4.0 8.4 2.1 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 700C2 SD/RJS/VS/WS 1.74E+06 4.2 5.2 3.5 99.65 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 7.19E+06 4.3 5.7 0.0 99.91 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 358C1 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.68E+07 4.3 11.3 0.5 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C7 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.36E+07 4.3 5.6 3.7 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C8 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 4.81E+07 4.4 6.7 1.9 99.99 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 707C8 QT/WS 4.6 12.3 0.7 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 3.92E+07 4.6 6.1 2.6 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C5 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 2.72E+07 4.7 6.5 3.3 99.97 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 4.9 4.9 4.9 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 504C1 VS/C 6.38E+04 5.1 11.4 0.1 89.37 In: MACT EU (WS)TABLE A-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.93E+08 5.5 7.0 4.1 100.00 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 7.32E+06 5.6 7.0 3.6 99.89 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 209C6 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.65E+07 5.8 6.3 5.2 99.98 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 714C4 WS 4.65E+06 6.2 7.6 3.8 99.80 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 3.27E+06 6.4 12.8 0.3 99.71 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 8.92E+05 6.8 17.9 1.1 98.89 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 707A1 QT/WS 7.2 8.2 5.8 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 701C3 VS/PT 7.2 8.0 5.9 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 357C1 QC/VS/PT/IWS 1.05E+07 7.5 10.3 5.0 99.90 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 707C9 QT/WS 8.17E+06 7.6 13.0 4.0 99.87 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 3.51E+06 7.7 11.4 4.3 99.97 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 707C2 QT/WS 6.48E+06 7.9 10.2 3.5 99.82 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 329C1 PT/IWS 2.00E+07 8.3 15.4 3.2 99.94 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 358C4 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.39E+07 9.1 9.6 8.2 99.97 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 9.2 10.1 8.0 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 9.7 12.2 7.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 216C7 HES/WS 9.7 11.4 8.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 805C1 QT/QS/VS/ES/PBS 3.47E+06 10.0 15.0 7.4 99.58 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 216C2 HES/WS 10.4 11.5 8.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 221C3 PT 11.4 13.0 8.4 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 339C1 AT/PT/RJS/ESP 3.56E+07 11.5 46.2 0.2 99.95 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 707C4 QT/WS 9.03E+06 11.8 13.2 10.7 99.81 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 12.3 19.7 5.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 4.18E+06 13.0 17.4 8.5 99.55 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 707C3 QT/WS 1.09E+07 13.0 20.4 9.2 99.83 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 4.45E+06 14.0 18.9 10.3 99.54 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 221C2 PT 14.7 16.7 13.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 210C1 FF/S 1.99E+07 15.7 27.7 5.9 99.89 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 221C1 PT 16.5 19.8 10.9 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.86E+07 16.6 24.6 6.5 99.94 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 9.62E+06 19.7 35.5 1.4 99.70 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 9.39E+06 21.7 28.5 17.2 99.66 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 2.37E+06 22.4 26.4 18.4 98.62 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 701C1 VS/PT 26.1 27.7 24.5 Out: No MTECTABLE A-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 713C1 VS/PT 1.22E+05 26.9 28.4 24.5 67.93 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 2.61E+06 28.9 51.2 1.0 98.39 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 3.19E+06 29.6 46.4 18.8 98.65 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 714C3 WS 6.38E+06 32.0 38.7 23.6 99.27 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 6.27E+06 32.6 34.9 29.2 99.24 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 221C4 PT 34.2 39.7 24.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 209C3 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.04E+07 35.3 42.0 30.8 99.50 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 211C1 FF/S 2.55E+07 37.7 48.3 27.9 99.78 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 8.71E+06 39.3 101.1 4.0 99.34 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 221C5 PT 39.7 42.9 38.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 906C2 QT/PT 4.82E+06 44.1 64.4 16.0 98.67 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 806C1 C/VS 45.3 47.0 43.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 333C1 SD/FF 8.57E+06 48.6 59.1 33.7 99.17 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 806C2 C/VS 9.51E+02 52.2 72.7 33.1 -4147.19 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 210C2 FF/S 1.81E+07 54.1 62.8 45.0 99.56 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 2.17E+08 54.4 56.0 52.8 99.96 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 55.8 77.2 31.9 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 333C2 SD/FF 1.31E+07 59.0 83.0 20.1 99.35 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 332C1 WS 3.84E+07 64.8 86.1 36.3 99.75 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 714C2 WS 7.34E+06 70.3 81.4 63.7 98.61 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 714C1 WS 1.04E+07 70.4 76.3 67.0 99.01 In: MACT EU (WS)Tot Cl INC 725C1 WS/QT 75.2 95.1 65.1 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 2.58E+08 96.8 108.6 85.1 99.95 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 99.3 111.4 91.4 Out: No MTEC, Not MACTTot Cl INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.54E+08 102.0 126.4 78.1 99.90 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 4.04E+07 106.5 142.9 78.4 99.62 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 212C1 FF/S 3.31E+07 133.9 249.6 64.2 99.41 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 906C1 QT/PT 6.22E+07 134.3 143.7 117.3 99.69 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 714C5 WS 1.27E+07 135.6 212.2 94.2 98.44 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/M (714C4)Tot Cl INC 500C2 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.26E+07 139.3 343.2 2.2 98.39 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/M (500C4)Tot Cl INC 906C3 QT/PT 5.27E+07 159.4 179.6 126.7 99.56 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 229C4 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.86E+08 159.8 271.4 48.2 99.87 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 324C4 ? 163.2 668.6 2.9 Out: No MTEC, Unknown APCSTot Cl INC 704C1 NONE 9.45E+07 163.7 178.1 155.5 99.75 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTABLE A-15. TOTAL CHLORINE, INCINERATORS, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl INC 725C2 WS/QT 164.7 177.6 140.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 906C5 QT/PT 7.94E+07 188.3 205.1 172.0 99.65 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 324C3 ? 192.6 622.8 4.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 324C1 ? 200.9 550.4 7.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 704C2 NONE 1.14E+08 214.3 274.3 167.2 99.73 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 324C2 ? 215.1 560.2 7.8 Out: No MTECTot Cl INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.96E+08 218.1 318.4 154.4 99.84 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 914C1 ? 1.77E+07 227.1 273.4 202.3 98.13 Out: Unknown APCSTot Cl INC 906C4 QT/PT 6.57E+07 252.7 344.8 175.5 99.44 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 703C1 WHB 5.41E+05 325.5 376.4 247.8 12.48 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 710C3 QT/OS/C/S 4.52E+07 346.8 353.9 341.5 98.88 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 710C1 QT/OS/C/S 6.52E+07 355.5 381.7 306.3 99.21 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 703C2 WHB 4.87E+05 378.1 445.2 260.7 -13.00 Out: Not MACTTot Cl INC 710C2 QT/OS/C/S 4.91E+07 439.6 483.1 382.8 98.70 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTot Cl INC 784C1 NONE 1012.3 1061.3 963.5 Out: No MTEC, Not MACTTot Cl INC 784C2 NONE 1067.9 1119.8 974.5 Out: No MTEC, Not MACTTABLE A-16. TOTAL CHLORINE, CEMENT KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl CK 204C2 ESP 1623198 0.1 0.1 0.1 99.99 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 1.6e6)Tot Cl CK 304C2 ESP 0.4 0.6 0.2 Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 30141 FF 1173310 0.4 0.6 0.3 99.96 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 1.2e6)Tot Cl CK 403C1 ESP 1600315 0.7 1.6 0.2 99.95 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 1.6e6)Tot Cl CK 30151 FF 1173310 0.7 1.0 0.3 99.93 Already in MACT poolTot Cl CK 403C2 ESP 2145033 0.9 1.1 0.8 99.95 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 2.2e6)Tot Cl CK 315C1 FF 474426 1.4 1.7 1.1 99.71 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 4.7e5)Tot Cl CK 202C1 FF 300489 1.7 2.5 1.2 99.77 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 303C1 QC/FF 0 2.0 3.1 1.2 98.99 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 315C2 FF 390116 2.7 2.8 2.6 99.38 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 317C1 FF 123778 2.9 3.5 2.2 98.58 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 306C1 MC/FF 738535 2.9 3.9 2.3 99.46 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 405C1 ESP 1643118 3.2 4.0 2.6 99.81 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 317C2 FF 258946 3.7 5.6 2.2 99.11 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 208C1 ESP 425585 4.5 6.2 2.9 98.96 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 207C1 MC/ESP 736365 4.9 5.3 4.5 99.26 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 308C1 ESP 778873 5.6 6.3 4.4 99.19 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 320C1 FF 334170 5.9 9.2 3.9 98.08 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 317C3 FF 0 7.0 7.8 6.0 94.79 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 321C1 ESP 1123822 9.5 12.0 6.9 99.10 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 302C1 ESP 2187394 10.2 11.0 9.8 99.36 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 401C5 ESP 1858356 10.4 14.9 6.9 99.37 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 205C1 ESP 546972 16.6 20.2 13.5 96.05 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 200C1 FF 3238628 18.2 24.1 15.3 99.19 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 201C1 FF 3019743 20.1 24.9 16.6 99.04 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 402C1 ESP 2789198 21.6 41.9 6.7 99.05 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 402C4 ESP 2824189 22.0 31.7 14.2 99.07 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 316C2 FF 440198 22.2 25.0 20.5 96.03 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 322C1 ESP 3069875 22.6 27.5 18.4 98.96 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 319C2 ESP 27.1 29.2 25.6 Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 305C3 ESP 472114 28.4 30.2 25.9 93.10 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 202C2 FF 853544 31.1 46.6 14.2 97.73 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 300C1 ESP 2214874 33.8 43.7 23.8 97.81 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 316C1 FF 695311 35.1 36.9 33.5 95.34 In: MACT EU (FC)TABLE A-16. TOTAL CHLORINE, CEMENT KILNS, NEW SOURCE MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl CK 309C1 MC/ESP 1025758 35.7 44.1 24.1 95.23 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 303C2 QC/FF 1257091 36.0 96.8 5.3 96.71 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 401C1 ESP 3673829 36.2 47.4 22.4 98.76 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 319C8 ESP 197381 42.4 42.4 42.4 84.36 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 319C7 ESP 42.5 53.5 31.4 Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 406C1 ESP 823050 42.8 121.9 4.6 96.41 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 318C2 ESP 50.6 62.5 42.5 Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 319C4 ESP 51.1 57.2 39.3 Out: No MTECTot Cl CK 318C1 ESP 739756 51.3 63.9 41.7 91.71 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 404C2 ESP 2085052 56.8 66.5 49.6 96.89 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 309C2 MC/ESP 1003736 57.0 83.5 31.6 92.27 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 323C1 ESP 3649388 71.9 101.1 31.4 97.19 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl CK 404C1 ESP 1646409 76.6 105.7 20.5 94.75 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 206C1 ESP 983390 81.2 148.2 15.1 89.09 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 203C1 ESP 1334596 117.2 128.7 96.4 87.29 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 335C1 ESP 644562 121.9 150.9 102.6 77.97 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 305C1 ESP 1237797 157.2 185.6 105.9 94.79 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl CK 319C6 ESP 829955 220.8 227.2 214.5 61.27 In: MACT EU (FC)TABLE A-17. TOTAL CHLORINE, LWAKs, 12% MACT FLOOR ANALYSISSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Stack Gas Conc (ppmv) SRE CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Avg Max Min (%)Tot Cl LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 7699496 13 15 11 99.75 Source already in MACT poolTot Cl LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 13945545 26 33 20 99.73 MACT pool (VS w/ MTEC of 1.4e7)Tot Cl LWAK 224C1 FF 853320 29 83 2 95.12 Out: MB problemTot Cl LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 12158726 31 38 26 99.63 Source already in MACT poolTot Cl LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 3309746 42 95 22 98.17 Source already in MACT poolTot Cl LWAK 225C1 FF 838545 641 753 567 -10.55 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 8.4e5)Tot Cl LWAK 314C1 FF 1539260 853 921 815 33.74 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 1.5e6)Tot Cl LWAK 310C1 FF 765771 1199 1235 1160 -68.03 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 7.6e5)Tot Cl LWAK 312C1 FF 1907626 1241 1342 1071 18.59 MACT pool (FC w/ MTEC of 1.9e6)Tot Cl LWAK 311C1 FF 901527 1258 1353 1185 -47.23 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl LWAK 227C1 FF 676245 1347 1522 1000 -71.64 In: MACT EU (FC)Tot Cl LWAK 313C1 FF 2095927 1509 1573 1420 7.81 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTot Cl LWAK 223C1 FF 2395327 2079 2317 1755 -25.75 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTABLE A-18. SUMMARY OF 12% MACT FLOOR FOR EXISTING SOURCES(BASED ON STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF MACT EU)HAP Units Incinerators Cement Kilns LWA KilnsStnd Design Stnd Design Stnd DesignPCDD/PCDF TEQ ng/dscm 0.25 0.12 0.23 0.14 0.23 0.14Mercuryμg/dscm 13 5.6 32 21 32 17Semi Volatile Metalsμg/dscm 53 22 240 92 61 29Low Volatile Metalsμg/dscm 61 28 46 19 57 36Particulate Matter gr/dscf 0.024 0.012 0.043 0.024 0.012 0.006Total Chlorine ppmv 23 9 25 11 1800 1300CO ppmv 120 52 n/a n/a 270 120THC ppmv 12 6.1 m : 20* m : 10 14 6.5b : 6.7 b : 5.1or CO 100 or CO 100m : cement kiln main stackb : cement kiln bypass stack* : Based on current RCRA standard

# APPENDIX B

ORIGINAL 6% FLOOR OPTION

In the process of arriving at the proposed MACT “6% Floor” procedure described in detail in the main body of this report for evaluating MACT for existing sources, an earlier methodology and resulting floor levels were considered; cost analysis for these floors are presented in Volume V. The rationale and procedure at arriving at these floors is described in the following. The procedure is very similar to that described above “6% Floor”, with the following differences:

• Source test conditions are ranked by condition median, not by condition average, as done in the proposed 6% Floor approach.

• Full MTECs used, based on contributions from all feedstream, not just hazardous waste as done in the proposed approach.

• HCl and Cl 2 

# were considered separately, not combined in a total chlorine group as in the
proposed approach.

• No PCDD/PCDF floor was set (only a beyond-the-level was considered).

• Cement kiln bypass CO or HC levels were not considered.

• The statistical analysis procedure to determine the floor was not used. Instead, the MACT EU set of conditions were plotted; floor levels were selected based on these plots. Floor levels were either set at the median level of the highest emitting source condition or at a level where a “break” in the EU plot occurred. Facilities emtting above this breakpoint source are not believed to be using MACT technology. Note that test condition variability was not considered (i.e., variance was not added on to the highest emitting or breakpoint source average).

• For mercury, when stack gas emissions were not available but feedrate measurements were available, feedrate MTEC converted emissions levels were used as the stack gas emissions level (assuming that all feedrate mercury partitions to the stack as emissions, which for mercury makes sense due to its high volatility).

Similar to that in Sections 3 and 4 and Appendix A for the 6% and 12% floor analyses, for each HAP and source category combination, summary tables of all test condition stack gas emissions data from the HWC database (presented in the accompanying Technical Support Document for

B-1

# HWC MACT Standards, Volume II: HWC Emissions Data Base ) are provided in Tables B-1 through B-18. Additionally, plots of all of the MACT pool and expanded universe facilities are shown in Figures B-1 through B-18. A summary of the MACT floor levels for the “Original 6% Option” are given in Table B-19.

B-2DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEE 

# 354C1, QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS, OR=1.0% 337C1, WHB/DA/DI/FF, OR=1.5% 350C3, WHB/HE/FF, OR=2.0% 350C2, WHB/HE/FF, OR=2.5% 350C6, WHB/HE/FF, OR=3.5% 354C2, QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS, OR=4.0% 209C1, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, OR=4.5% 350C4, WHB/HE/FF, OR=5.0% 350C5, WHB/HE/FF, OR=5.5% 209C2, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, OR=6.0% 349C3, QC/FF/QC/PT, OR=6.5%

350C9, WHB/HE/FF, OR=7.0% 327C3, SD/FF/WS/ESP, OR=7.5% 350C8, WHB/HE/FF, OR=8.5% 349C2, QC/FF/QC/PT, OR=9.0% 349C4, QC/FF/QC/PT, OR=10.9% 327C2, SD/FF/WS/ESP, OR=11.4% 341C2, DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA, OR=11.9% 338C2, QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM, OR=12.4% 333C2, SD/FF, OR=12.9% 338C1, QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM, OR=13.9% 350C1, WHB/HE/FF, OR=14.4% 333C1, SD/FF, OR=14.9% 354C3, QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS, OR=15.4% 209C7, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, OR=17.4% 327C1, SD/FF/WS/ESP, OR=18.4% 341C1, DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA, OR=18.9% 325C6, SD/FF/WS/IWS, OR=20.4% 325C4, SD/FF/WS/IWS, OR=23.9% 359C4, WHB/FF/S, OR=24.4% 209C8, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, OR=25.4% 209C4, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, OR=26.4% 325C5, SD/FF/WS/IWS, OR=28.4% 325C7, SD/FF/WS/IWS, OR=28.9% 351C1, GC/C/FF, OR=30.8% 351C2, GC/C/FF, OR=31.3% 349C1, QC/FF/QC/PT, OR=31.8% 210C1, FF/S, OR=32.3% 210C2, FF/S, OR=32.8% 400C1, SD/FF, OR=33.3% 359C3, WHB/FF/S, OR=34.8% 209C5, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, OR=35.3% 359C1, WHB/FF/S, OR=35.8% 359C2, WHB/FF/S, OR=37.3% 359C5, WHB/FF/S, OR=38.3% 209C3, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, OR=39.3% 727C1, GC/C/FF, OR=41.3% 211C1, FF/S, OR=42.3% 209C6, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, OR=43.3% 351C3, GC/C/FF, OR=48.3% 351C4, GC/C/FF, OR=50.7% 354C4, QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS, OR=62.2% 212C1, FF/S, OR=63.7% 357C1, QC/VS/PT/IWS, OR=65.2% 503C1, HTHE/ LTHE/ FF, OR=67.2% 503C2, HTHE/ LTHE/ FF, OR=69.7%00.010.020.030.040.050.060.07 

# PM (gr/dscf @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-1. PM, incinerators, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DD DDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEE EEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 315C1, FF, OR=1.9%

315C2, FF, OR=3.7%

317C1, FF, OR=7.4%

317C2, FF, OR=9.3%

320C1, FF, OR=11.1%

404C2, ESP, OR=13.0%

404C1, ESP, OR=14.8%

318C2, ESP, OR=16.7%

316C1, FF, OR=18.5%

30151, FF, OR=20.4%

316C2, FF, OR=22.2%

208C1, ESP, OR=31.5%

208C2, ESP, OR=33.3%

306C1, MC/FF, OR=35.2%

406C1, ESP, OR=37.0%

207C2, MC/ESP, OR=38.9%

309C2, MC/ESP, OR=40.7%

202C1, FF, OR=46.3%

308C1, ESP, OR=50.0%

303C1, QC/FF, OR=51.9%

206C1, ESP, OR=53.7%

303C2, QC/FF, OR=55.6%

202C2, FF, OR=57.4%

207C1, MC/ESP, OR=59.3%

309C1, MC/ESP, OR=61.1%

323C1, ESP, OR=63.0%

30141, FF, OR=70.4%

319C1, ESP, OR=74.1%

30143, FF, OR=77.8%

205C1, ESP, OR=79.6%

30153, FF, OR=88.9%00.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.08 

# PM (gr/dscf @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-2. PM, cement kilns, existing sources, "6% original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDD DDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEE 

# 225C1, FF, OR=6.3%

226C1, FF, OR=12.5%

227C1, FF, OR=18.8%

223C1, FF, OR=25.0%

224C1, FF, OR=31.3%

307C4, MC/FF/VS, OR=37.5%

311C1, FF, OR=43.8%

313C1, FF, OR=50.0%

312C1, FF, OR=56.3%

336C1, FF, OR=75.0%

307C1, MC/FF/VS, OR=68.8%

307C2, MC/FF/VS, OR=81.3%

307C3, MC/FF/VS, OR=93.8%

314C1, FF, OR=100.0%00.0050.010.0150.020.0250.03 

# PM (gr/dscf @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-3. PM, LWAKs, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE1 

# 221C5, SS/PT/VS, MTEC=4.8E+1, OR=1.2%

221C3, SS/PT/VS, MTEC=3.3E+1, OR=2.5%

904C1, ?, MTEC=1.5E-1, OR=3.7%

904C2, ?, MTEC=1.5E-1, OR=4.9%

904C3, ?, MTEC=1.7E-1, OR=6.2%

906C3, QT/PT/DM, MTEC=3.6E-1, OR=9.9%

824C1, QT/VS/PT/DM, MTEC=4.1E+0, OR=13.6%

500C4, QC/VS/KOV/DM, MTEC=1.1E+0, OR=18.5%

705C1, QT/VS/ESP/PT, MTEC=5.2E-2, OR=24.7%

704C2, NONE, MTEC=2.7E+0, OR=28.4%

704C1, NONE, MTEC=2.9E+0, OR=29.6%

334C2, WS/ESP/PT, MTEC=3.8E+1, OR=34.6%

700C1, SD/RJS/VS/WS, MTEC=9.2E+0, OR=35.8%

330C1, QT/WS/DM, MTEC=7.4E-2, OR=37.0%

221C1, SS/PT/VS, MTEC=7.7E+0, OR=38.3%

807C3, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, MTEC=7.1E-1, OR=39.5%

330C2, QT/WS/DM, MTEC=2.0E-1, OR=40.7%

700C1, SD/RJS/VS/WS, MTEC=9.2E+0, OR=46.9%

807C1, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, MTEC=2.0E+1, OR=49.4%

708C3, WS/ESP, MTEC=1.3E+1, OR=50.6%

710C1, QT/OS/C/S, MTEC=1.3E+1, OR=53.1%

708C2, WS/ESP, MTEC=1.4E+1, OR=54.3%

221C4, SS/PT/VS, MTEC=1.5E+1, OR=56.8%

710C3, QT/OS/C/S, MTEC=1.6E+1, OR=60.5%

708C1, WS/ESP, MTEC=1.8E+1, OR=63.0%

221C2, SS/PT/VS, MTEC=1.7E+1, OR=65.4%

902C1, QT/VS/PT, MTEC=3.2E+1, OR=76.5%0102030405060 

# Hg (μg/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-4. Hg, incinerators, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 404C1, ESP, MTEC=4.2E+1, OR=7.4%

406C1, ESP, MTEC=1.1E+2, OR=9.3%

202C1, FF, MTEC=5.5E+0, OR=11.1%

203C1, ESP, MTEC=4.2E+1, OR=13.0%

206C1, ESP, MTEC=8.8E+1, OR=18.5%

207C1, MC/ESP, MTEC=1.1E+2, OR=20.4%

204C1, ESP, MTEC=1.1E+2, OR=24.1%

317C3, FF, MTEC=1.9E+1, OR=25.9%

202C2, FF, MTEC=5.7E+1, OR=29.6%

208C1, ESP, MTEC=1.0E+2, OR=31.5%

317C1, FF, MTEC=2.4E+1, OR=33.3%

205C1, ESP, MTEC=5.9E+1, OR=35.2%

317C2, FF, MTEC=3.2E+1, OR=37.0%

315C1, FF, MTEC=3.4E+1, OR=38.9%

315C2, FF, MTEC=3.5E+1, OR=40.7%

323C1, ESP, MTEC=3.6E+1, OR=42.6%

401C5, ESP, MTEC=5.7E+1, OR=44.4%

322C1, ESP, MTEC=4.4E+1, OR=50.0%

402C4, ESP, MTEC=4.3E+1, OR=53.7%

302C1, ESP, MTEC=6.1E+1, OR=59.3%

320C1, FF, MTEC=6.9E+1, OR=61.1%

316C1, FF, MTEC=9.4E+1, OR=64.8%

207C2, MC/ESP, MTEC=1.0E+2, OR=66.7%

208C2, ESP, MTEC=1.1E+2, OR=68.5%050100150200250300350 

# Hg (μg/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-5. Hg, cement kilns, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 313C1, FF, MTEC=4.6E+1, OR=6.7%

225C1, FF, MTEC=1.4E+1, OR=13.3%

312C1, FF, MTEC=4.2E+1, OR=20.0%

310C1, FF, MTEC=3.8E+1, OR=26.7%

224C1, FF, MTEC=2.9E+1, OR=33.3%0510152025 

# Hg (μg/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-6. Hg, LWAKs, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 354C1, QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS, MTEC=4.8E+4, OR=4.8%

500C1, QC/VS/KOV/DM, MTEC=9.7E+1, OR=7.1%

340C1, WHB/ESP/WS, MTEC=5.6E+3, OR=9.5%

327C2, SD/FF/WS/ESP, MTEC=4.0E+3, OR=11.9%

348C1, QC/AS/IWS, MTEC=8.9E+2, OR=13.1%

341C2, DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA, MTEC=2.1E+2, OR=15.5%

340C2, WHB/ESP/WS, MTEC=3.7E+3, OR=17.9%

341C1, DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA, MTEC=2.0E+2, OR=25.0%

325C7, SD/FF/WS/IWS, MTEC=7.0E+3, OR=27.4%

327C1, SD/FF/WS/ESP, MTEC=5.2E+3, OR=28.6%

327C3, SD/FF/WS/ESP, MTEC=1.1E+4, OR=38.1%020406080100120140 

# SVM (μg/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-7. SVM, incinerators, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 320C1, FF, MTEC=3.4E+4, OR=2.2%

316C2, FF, MTEC=7.5E+4, OR=4.4%

316C1, FF, MTEC=8.9E+4, OR=6.7%

30142, FF, MTEC=1.6E+5, OR=11.1%

30152, FF, MTEC=1.6E+5, OR=13.3%

303C1, QC/FF, MTEC=8.1E+3, OR=15.6%

306C1, MC/FF, MTEC=5.0E+4, OR=22.2%

317C1, FF, MTEC=4.7E+4, OR=24.4%

317C3, FF, MTEC=5.7E+3, OR=26.7%

317C2, FF, MTEC=5.6E+4, OR=28.9%

303C3, QC/FF, MTEC=3.6E+4, OR=33.3%

201C1, FF, MTEC=1.5E+5, OR=35.6%05001000150020002500300035004000 

# SVM (μg/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-8. SVM, cement kilns, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 225C1, FF, MTEC=2.5E+5, OR=7.7%

307C4, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=7.1E+4, OR=15.4%

307C3, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=7.4E+4, OR=23.1%

224C1, FF, MTEC=2.3E+4, OR=30.8%

307C2, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=6.6E+4, OR=46.2%

307C1, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=7.3E+4, OR=53.8%0246810121416 

# SVM (μg/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-9. SVM, LWAKs, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 348C1, QC/AS/IWS, MTEC=6.2E+3, OR=2.3%

500C1, QC/VS/KOV/DM, MTEC=1.0E+3, OR=3.4%

341C1, DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA, MTEC=3.5E+2, OR=10.3%

341C2, DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA, MTEC=3.9E+2, OR=11.5%

325C4, SD/FF/WS/IWS, MTEC=6.1E+3, OR=24.1%

221C2, SS/PT/VS, MTEC=8.3E+2, OR=25.3%

325C5, SD/FF/WS/IWS, MTEC=3.3E+3, OR=43.7%

221C1, SS/PT/VS, MTEC=1.2E+2, OR=44.8%

221C4, SS/PT/VS, MTEC=5.1E+2, OR=52.9%

325C7, SD/FF/WS/IWS, MTEC=3.8E+3, OR=54.0%050100150200250300350 

# LVM (μg/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-10. LVM, incinerators, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 316C2, FF, MTEC=7.6E+4, OR=2.2%

320C1, FF, MTEC=6.5E+4, OR=4.4%

309C1, MC/ESP, MTEC=1.4E+5, OR=6.7%

303C3, QC/FF, MTEC=4.1E+4, OR=8.9%

308C1, ESP, MTEC=7.1E+4, OR=15.6%

207C2, MC/ESP, MTEC=2.9E+4, OR=17.8%

208C1, ESP, MTEC=3.0E+4, OR=24.4%

335C1, ESP, MTEC=5.1E+4, OR=26.7%

208C2, ESP, MTEC=2.4E+4, OR=35.6%

318C2, ESP, MTEC=1.7E+4, OR=42.2%

303C1, QC/FF, MTEC=4.4E+3, OR=44.4%

305C3, ESP, MTEC=6.6E+4, OR=48.9%

317C3, FF, MTEC=4.1E+4, OR=55.6%

401C5, ESP, MTEC=1.9E+4, OR=57.8%

203C1, ESP, MTEC=5.5E+4, OR=64.4%

207C1, MC/ESP, MTEC=3.1E+4, OR=68.9%

300C2, ESP, MTEC=4.9E+5, OR=84.4%050100150200250300 

# LVM (μg/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-11. LVM, cement kilns, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 225C1, FF, MTEC=4.1E+4, OR=7.7%

224C1, FF, MTEC=6.7E+4, OR=15.4%

227C1, FF, MTEC=2.1E+5, OR=23.1%

307C1, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=1.3E+5, OR=30.8%

307C2, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=1.0E+5, OR=38.5%

312C1, FF, MTEC=1.3E+5, OR=46.2%

223C1, FF, MTEC=8.7E+4, OR=53.8%

311C1, FF, MTEC=1.2E+5, OR=61.5%

307C4, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=1.0E+5, OR=76.9%

307C3, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=1.0E+5, OR=84.6%

314C1, FF, MTEC=8.9E+4, OR=92.3%

313C1, FF, MTEC=1.2E+5, OR=100.0%0100200300400500600700800 

# LVM (μg/dscm @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-12. LVM, LWAKs, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 339C1, AT/PT/RJS/ESP, MTEC=3.6E+7, OR=2.2% 700C2, SD/RJS/VS/WS, MTEC=1.7E+6, OR=4.3% 354C3, QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS, MTEC=1.4E+7, OR=13.0% 210C1, FF/S, MTEC=2.2E+7, OR=17.4% 700C1, SD/RJS/VS/WS, MTEC=3.1E+6, OR=26.1% 807C1, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, MTEC=2.3E+6, OR=28.3% 807C3, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, MTEC=1.1E+6, OR=39.1% 807C2, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, MTEC=1.4E+6, OR=41.3% 329C1, PT/IWS, MTEC=1.7E+7, OR=43.5% 500C3, QC/VS/KOV/DM, MTEC=1.6E+7, OR=45.7% 210C2, FF/S, MTEC=1.8E+7, OR=50.0% 348C1, QC/AS/IWS, MTEC=9.8E+7, OR=0.7% 808C2, QT/PBS/ESP, MTEC=2.2E+7, OR=3.4% 358C2, QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM, MTEC=1.2E+7, OR=4.7% 354C3, QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS, MTEC=1.4E+7, OR=6.8% 708C3, WS/ESP, MTEC=5.5E+7, OR=9.5% 600C1, WHB/QC/PT/IWS, MTEC=3.1E+7, OR=10.1% 354C2, QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS, MTEC=3.1E+7, OR=10.8% 728C1, QT/PT/VS, MTEC=1.8E+7, OR=12.2% 358C3, QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM, MTEC=4.1E+7, OR=14.2% 325C4, SD/FF/WS/IWS, MTEC=1.2E+7, OR=15.5%

808C1, QT/PBS/ESP, MTEC=2.6E+7, OR=16.9% 711C1, C/VS/AS, MTEC=8.7E+5, OR=18.2% 708C1, WS/ESP, MTEC=8.5E+7, OR=18.9% 711C2, C/VS/AS, MTEC=1.7E+5, OR=21.6% 711C3, C/VS/AS, MTEC=8.2E+5, OR=24.3% 354C1, QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS, MTEC=4.1E+7, OR=25.7% 807C1, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, MTEC=2.3E+6, OR=27.0% 708C2, WS/ESP, MTEC=6.4E+7, OR=27.7% 222C6, WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS, MTEC=2.8E+7, OR=30.4% 600C2, WHB/QC/PT/IWS, MTEC=4.9E+7, OR=34.5% 807C2, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, MTEC=1.4E+6, OR=35.8% 825C1, CCS/QC/ESP, MTEC=3.4E+7, OR=36.5% 824C1, QT/VS/PT/DM, MTEC=4.9E+6, OR=37.2% 358C1, QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM, MTEC=4.7E+7, OR=38.5% 807C3, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, MTEC=1.1E+6, OR=39.9% 325C5, SD/FF/WS/IWS, MTEC=1.9E+6, OR=40.5% 209C7, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, MTEC=3.3E+7, OR=41.2% 209C4, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, MTEC=1.2E+7, OR=41.9% 700C2, SD/RJS/VS/WS, MTEC=1.7E+6, OR=43.2% 209C5, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, MTEC=2.7E+7, OR=43.9% 209C8, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, MTEC=5.0E+7, OR=44.6% 902C1, QT/VS/PT, MTEC=4.0E+7, OR=45.9% 209C6, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, MTEC=3.7E+7, OR=49.3% 325C6, SD/FF/WS/IWS, MTEC=3.4E+6, OR=50.0% 357C1, QC/VS/PT/IWS, MTEC=1.0E+7, OR=52.7% 329C1, PT/IWS, MTEC=1.7E+7, OR=54.7% 358C4, QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM, MTEC=4.4E+7, OR=57.4% 325C7, SD/FF/WS/IWS, MTEC=8.1E+6, OR=64.2% 334C1, WS/ESP/PT, MTEC=3.5E+6, OR=64.9% 209C1, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, MTEC=3.8E+7, OR=65.5% 339C1, AT/PT/RJS/ESP, MTEC=3.6E+7, OR=67.6% 334C2, WS/ESP/PT, MTEC=9.6E+6, OR=69.6% 209C2, WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM, MTEC=4.0E+7, OR=70.3% 502C1, WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES, MTEC=9.5E+6, OR=70.9% 700C1, SD/RJS/VS/WS, MTEC=3.1E+6, OR=73.0% 713C1, VS/PT, MTEC=5.1E+4, OR=75.0%0102030405060708090100 

# HCl (ppmv @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-13. HCl, incinerators, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 204C2, ESP, MTEC=1.7E+6, OR=1.9%

30151, FF, MTEC=2.9E+6, OR=3.8%

30141, FF, MTEC=2.9E+6, OR=5.8%

403C1, ESP, MTEC=2.0E+6, OR=9.6%

403C2, ESP, MTEC=2.5E+6, OR=11.5%

202C1, FF, MTEC=1.2E+6, OR=13.5%

315C1, FF, MTEC=6.9E+5, OR=15.4%

303C1, QC/FF, MTEC=2.9E+5, OR=17.3%

306C1, MC/FF, MTEC=7.7E+5, OR=19.2%

405C1, ESP, MTEC=2.5E+6, OR=21.2%

315C2, FF, MTEC=5.7E+5, OR=23.1%

317C1, FF, MTEC=3.0E+5, OR=25.0%

320C1, FF, MTEC=4.2E+5, OR=26.9%

317C2, FF, MTEC=6.2E+5, OR=28.8%

208C1, ESP, MTEC=6.3E+5, OR=30.8%

207C1, MC/ESP, MTEC=9.6E+5, OR=32.7%

321C1, ESP, MTEC=1.6E+6, OR=34.6%

308C1, ESP, MTEC=1.0E+6, OR=36.5%

303C2, QC/FF, MTEC=1.2E+6, OR=38.5%

317C3, FF, MTEC=2.1E+5, OR=40.4%

401C5, ESP, MTEC=2.4E+6, OR=42.3%

302C1, ESP, MTEC=2.4E+6, OR=44.2%

205C1, ESP, MTEC=8.7E+5, OR=48.1%

316C2, FF, MTEC=8.2E+5, OR=53.8%

201C1, FF, MTEC=2.7E+6, OR=55.8%

305C3, ESP, MTEC=7.0E+5, OR=63.5%

202C2, FF, MTEC=1.6E+6, OR=65.4%

316C1, FF, MTEC=1.1E+6, OR=67.3%

300C1, ESP, MTEC=2.1E+6, OR=69.2%

406C1, ESP, MTEC=1.8E+6, OR=73.1%

309C1, MC/ESP, MTEC=1.0E+6, OR=75.0%

318C1, ESP, MTEC=8.8E+5, OR=80.8%

404C2, ESP, MTEC=2.7E+6, OR=82.7%

309C2, MC/ESP, MTEC=1.1E+6, OR=86.5%

206C1, ESP, MTEC=1.1E+6, OR=88.5%

404C1, ESP, MTEC=2.1E+6, OR=92.3%

335C1, ESP, MTEC=6.7E+5, OR=94.2%

203C1, ESP, MTEC=1.4E+6, OR=96.2%

319C6, ESP, MTEC=8.2E+5, OR=98.1%

305C1, ESP, MTEC=1.5E+6, OR=100.0%020406080100120140160180200 

# HCl (ppmv @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-14. HCl, cement kilns, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 307C3, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=7.8E+6, OR=15.4%

307C1, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=3.4E+6, OR=23.1%

307C2, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=1.4E+7, OR=30.8%

307C4, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=1.2E+7, OR=38.5%

225C1, FF, MTEC=8.4E+5, OR=46.2%

314C1, FF, MTEC=1.9E+6, OR=53.8%

310C1, FF, MTEC=9.6E+5, OR=61.5%

311C1, FF, MTEC=1.1E+6, OR=69.2%

227C1, FF, MTEC=1.4E+6, OR=84.6%02004006008001000120014001600 

# HCl (ppmv @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-15. HCl, LWAKs, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 339C1, AT/PT/RJS/ESP, MTEC=3.6E+7, OR=2.2%

700C2, SD/RJS/VS/WS, MTEC=1.7E+6, OR=4.3%

354C3, QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS, MTEC=1.4E+7, OR=13.0%

210C1, FF/S, MTEC=2.2E+7, OR=17.4%

700C1, SD/RJS/VS/WS, MTEC=3.1E+6, OR=26.1%

807C1, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, MTEC=2.3E+6, OR=28.3%

807C3, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, MTEC=1.1E+6, OR=39.1%

807C2, C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM, MTEC=1.4E+6, OR=41.3%

329C1, PT/IWS, MTEC=1.7E+7, OR=43.5%

500C3, QC/VS/KOV/DM, MTEC=1.6E+7, OR=45.7%

210C2, FF/S, MTEC=1.8E+7, OR=50.0%00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9 

# Cl 2 

# (ppmv @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-16. Cl2, incinerators, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 403C1, ESP, MTEC=2.0E+6, OR=1.9%

201C1, FF, MTEC=2.7E+6, OR=5.8%

200C1, FF, MTEC=3.2E+6, OR=7.7%

204C2, ESP, MTEC=1.7E+6, OR=9.6%

315C2, FF, MTEC=5.7E+5, OR=11.5%

315C1, FF, MTEC=6.9E+5, OR=13.5%

303C2, QC/FF, MTEC=1.2E+6, OR=15.4%

206C1, ESP, MTEC=1.1E+6, OR=17.3%

403C2, ESP, MTEC=2.5E+6, OR=19.2%

317C2, FF, MTEC=6.2E+5, OR=21.2%

317C3, FF, MTEC=2.1E+5, OR=23.1%

317C1, FF, MTEC=3.0E+5, OR=25.0%

318C1, ESP, MTEC=8.8E+5, OR=30.8%

309C2, MC/ESP, MTEC=1.1E+6, OR=34.6%

401C5, ESP, MTEC=2.4E+6, OR=36.5%

309C1, MC/ESP, MTEC=1.0E+6, OR=38.5%

305C3, ESP, MTEC=7.0E+5, OR=40.4%

303C1, QC/FF, MTEC=2.9E+5, OR=42.3%

306C1, MC/FF, MTEC=7.7E+5, OR=44.2%

406C1, ESP, MTEC=1.8E+6, OR=48.1%

202C1, FF, MTEC=1.2E+6, OR=50.0%

205C1, ESP, MTEC=8.7E+5, OR=55.8%

208C1, ESP, MTEC=6.3E+5, OR=59.6%

300C1, ESP, MTEC=2.1E+6, OR=63.5%

207C1, MC/ESP, MTEC=9.6E+5, OR=65.4%

305C1, ESP, MTEC=1.5E+6, OR=67.3%

202C2, FF, MTEC=1.6E+6, OR=69.2%

405C1, ESP, MTEC=2.5E+6, OR=71.2%

335C1, ESP, MTEC=6.7E+5, OR=73.1%

302C1, ESP, MTEC=2.4E+6, OR=75.0%

203C1, ESP, MTEC=1.4E+6, OR=78.8%

308C1, ESP, MTEC=1.0E+6, OR=80.8%

316C1, FF, MTEC=1.1E+6, OR=82.7%

404C2, ESP, MTEC=2.7E+6, OR=84.6%

316C2, FF, MTEC=8.2E+5, OR=88.5%

320C1, FF, MTEC=4.2E+5, OR=92.3%

321C1, ESP, MTEC=1.6E+6, OR=94.2%0123456789 

# Cl 2 

# (ppmv @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-17. Cl2, cement kilns, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.DDDDDDDDDIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 

# 225C1, FF, MTEC=8.4E+5, OR=7.7%

307C2, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=1.4E+7, OR=15.4%

307C3, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=7.8E+6, OR=23.1%

227C1, FF, MTEC=1.4E+6, OR=30.8%

224C1, FF, MTEC=8.5E+5, OR=38.5%

307C4, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=1.2E+7, OR=61.5%

307C1, MC/FF/VS, MTEC=3.4E+6, OR=69.2%

310C1, FF, MTEC=9.6E+5, OR=84.6%

311C1, FF, MTEC=1.1E+6, OR=92.3%051015202530354045 

# Cl 2 

# (ppmv @ 7% O 2 

# )Figure B-18. Cl2, LWAKs, existing sources, "6% Original" MACT pool and expanded universe.TABLE B-1. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(gr/dscf)PM INC 500C4 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.7e+0 1.8e-5 Out: Source Category OutlierPM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1.1e+1 2.0e-4 Source Already in MACT Pool, High variabilityPM INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 2.4e-4 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.6)PM INC 350C3 WHB/HE/FF 1.6e-1 4.0e-4 Source Already in MACT Pool, High variabilityPM INC 350C2 WHB/HE/FF 6.5e-2 5.0e-4 MACT source (FF, A/C=6.1)PM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 5.9e-4 Out: Haz Waste not BurnedPM INC 350C6 WHB/HE/FF 8.3e-2 6.0e-4 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 6.4e-4 MACT source (VS/IWS)PM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 8.6e+0 6.5e-4 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.2)PM INC 350C4 WHB/HE/FF 7.1e-2 7.0e-4 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 350C5 WHB/HE/FF 1.8e-1 7.0e-4 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.0e+1 7.0e-4 Source already in MACT poolPM INC 349C3 QC/FF/QC/PT 8.0e-4 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.5)PM INC 350C9 WHB/HE/FF 1.0e-1 8.0e-4 In: MACT EU (FF), High variabilityPM INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 8.9e-4 In: MACT EU (FF), High variabilityPM INC 350C8 WHB/HE/FF 1.8e-1 9.0e-4 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.6)PM INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM 2.4e+0 9.0e-4 Out: Not MACTPM INC 349C2 QC/FF/QC/PT 9.5e-4 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)PM INC 222C5 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 1.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 349C4 QC/FF/QC/PT 1.0e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)PM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 9.5e-1 1.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 726C2 QC/CS/DM/VS 1.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 1.2e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.1)PM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 2.2e-1 1.2e-3 In: MACT EU (FF/HEPA)PM INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 2.9e+1 1.2e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM INC 333C2 SD/FF 1.3e-3 In: MACT EU (FF), High variabilityPM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 1.3e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 350C1 WHB/HE/FF 1.4e-1 1.3e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=6.3)PM INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 9.2e+0 1.3e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM INC 333C1 SD/FF 1.4e-3 In: MACT EU (FF), High variabilityPM INC 354C3 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 7.7e+0 1.4e-3 In: MACT EU (VS/IWS)PM INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM 1.5e-3 Out: Not MACTTABLE B-1. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(gr/dscf)PM INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 2.0e+1 1.6e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.3e+0 1.6e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 209C7 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 2.5e+0 1.7e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.0)PM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 1.7e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 1.7e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 1.4e-1 1.8e-3 In: MACT EU (FF), High variabilityPM INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 2.3e+1 1.8e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 703C2 WHB 2.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 4.7e+1 2.0e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 1.9e+1 2.5e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 2.6e-3 Out: Haz Waste not BurnedPM INC 339C1 AT/PT/RJS/ESP 1.2e+0 2.9e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 222C7 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 3.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 714C4 WS 2.6e-3 3.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 904C2 ? 2.2e-3 3.0e-3 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.5e+1 3.0e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 3.0e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.4)PM INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 4.4e+0 3.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 209C8 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 4.1e+0 3.4e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.0)PM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 3.6e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 209C4 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.1e+0 3.7e-3 In: MACT EU (FF), High variabilityPM INC 726C1 QC/CS/DM/VS 4.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 703C1 WHB 4.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 600C2 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 2.2e-2 4.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 2.3e+1 4.0e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.3e+1 4.0e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.8)PM INC 914C1 ? 4.2e-3 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 500C2 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.2e+0 4.4e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 3.9e+1 4.7e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 351C1 GC/C/FF 4.7e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.2)PM INC 351C2 GC/C/FF 4.7e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.8)PM INC 349C1 QC/FF/QC/PT 4.8e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)TABLE B-1. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(gr/dscf)PM INC 210C1 FF/S 8.7e+1 5.1e-3 In: MACT EU (FF), High variabilityPM INC 210C2 FF/S 5.6e+0 5.2e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.3)PM INC 400C1 SD/FF 5.9e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.7)PM INC 714C3 WS 7.1e-3 6.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 6.4e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 359C3 WHB/FF/S 1.2e+1 7.2e-3 In: MACT EU (FF), High variabilityPM INC 209C5 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.5e+0 7.4e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.0)PM INC 359C1 WHB/FF/S 1.3e+1 7.5e-3 In: MACT EU (FF), High variabilityPM INC 331C1 PT/IWS 8.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 808C2 QT/PBS/ESP 2.2e+1 8.2e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 359C2 WHB/FF/S 1.3e+1 8.3e-3 In: MACT EU (FF), High variabilityPM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 4.2e+1 8.4e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 8.4e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.2)PM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 8.4e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 209C3 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.2e+0 8.9e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.1)PM INC 324C1 ? 9.0e-3 Out: Unknown APCS, High variabilityPM INC 714C2 WS 3.2e-3 9.0e-3 Out: Not MACTPM INC 324C3 ? 9.4e-3 Out: Unknown APCS, High variabilityPM INC 727C1 GC/C/FF 1.0e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.1)PM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 8.8e-2 1.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 211C1 FF/S 8.9e+0 1.0e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM INC 209C6 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 4.9e-1 1.1e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.0)PM INC 904C3 ? 1.6e-2 1.1e-2 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 1.1e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 600C1 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 1.1e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 324C2 ? 1.2e-2 Out: Unknown APCS, High variabilityPM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 1.2e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 9.2e-2 1.2e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 1.2e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 350C7 WHB/HE/FF 7.9e-3 1.3e-2 Out: APCS BypassedPM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 1.3e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 708C3 WS/ESP 2.4e+0 1.3e-2 Out: Not MACTTABLE B-1. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(gr/dscf)PM INC 351C3 GC/C/FF 1.3e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.2)PM INC 324C4 ? 1.3e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscf, High variability, Unknown APCSPM INC 904C1 ? 1.7e-2 1.3e-2 Out: Unknown APCSPM INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 1.3e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 808C1 QT/PBS/ESP 3.4e+1 1.3e-2 Out: Not MACT, High variabilityPM INC 351C4 GC/C/FF 1.4e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.0)PM INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 1.4e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 1.5e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 704C1 NONE 6.7e-1 1.5e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C3 QT/WS 3.9e+0 1.5e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C7 HES/WS 1.6e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 1.7e-2 Out: Not MACT, High variabilityPM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 1.7e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscf, High variabilityPM INC 708C1 WS/ESP 3.5e+0 1.7e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.7e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C4 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.8e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 710C1 QT/OS/C/S 8.5e-1 1.8e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 711C1 C/VS/AS 1.2e-2 1.8e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 504C1 VS/C818524059751.8e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 214C3 IWS 1.9e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 214C1 IWS 1.9e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 915C3 QC/VS/C 1.9e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 725C1 WS/QT 2.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 712C2 NONE 2.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 5.8e+1 2.1e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM8.8e+2 2.1e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 710C2 QT/OS/C/S 9.5e-1 2.1e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM7.1e+2 2.2e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 354C4 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 4.1e+0 2.3e-2 In: MACT EU (VS/IWS)PM INC 711C2 C/VS/AS 4.1e+0 2.3e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 702A3 QT/S/C 2.3e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 212C1 FF/S 1.2e+2 2.3e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.0)TABLE B-1. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(gr/dscf)PM INC 712C1 NONE 2.4e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 704C2 NONE 1.1e-1 2.4e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 357C1 QC/VS/PT/IWS 1.9e+0 2.4e-2 In: MACT EU (VS/IWS)PM INC 358C2 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 8.2e+0 2.5e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C6 HES/WS 2.5e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 2.6e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 2.6e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=5.2)PM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 2.6e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 706C3 QT/HS/C 1.3e+1 2.6e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 701C2 VS/PT 2.7e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 358C4 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 8.1e+0 2.7e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 2.7e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=4.8)PM INC 216C1 HES/WS 2.7e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 700C2 SD/RJS/VS/WS 5.3e-2 2.9e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C7 QT/WS 3.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 806C2 C/VS 4.4e+1 3.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 329C1 PT/IWS 3.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM6.3e+2 3.1e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 356C1 QC/AS/FN/S/DM 7.5e-1 3.1e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 3.1e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C5 HES/WS 3.2e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707A2 QT/WS 5.9e+0 3.2e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 214C2 IWS 3.2e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 358C1 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 9.5e+0 3.3e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 701C1 VS/PT 3.3e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C2 QT/WS 3.4e+0 3.5e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 3.5e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 906C5 QT/PT 2.2e-2 3.6e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 714C5 WS 5.1e-2 3.6e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C4 QT/WS 3.7e+0 3.6e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT579734804963.7e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 784C1 NONE 3.8e-2 Out: Not MACTTABLE B-1. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(gr/dscf)PM INC 714C1 WS 4.3e-2 3.8e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 706C1 QT/HS/C 1.5e+1 3.9e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C1 QT/WS 4.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 709C1 NONE 4.1e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscf, High variabilityPM INC 358C3 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 7.6e+0 4.3e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 728C1 QT/PT/VS 6.8e-1 4.3e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 784C2 NONE 4.4e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 702A1 QT/S/C 4.4e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 710C3 QT/OS/C/S 1.2e+0 4.4e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 711C3 C/VS/AS 2.9e+0 4.5e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707C8 QT/WS 4.5e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 708C2 WS/ESP 2.4e+0 4.5e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 707A1 QT/WS 4.6e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 353C3 QC/VS/DM/ESP 4.6e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 702A2 QT/S/C 4.6e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 216C4 HES/WS 5.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 5.3e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 805C1 QT/QS/VS/ES/PBS 3.2e+1 5.7e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 906C1 QT/PT 1.7e-2 5.7e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 5.8e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 6.8e-2 5.8e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 5.8e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 806C1 C/VS 5.4e+1 5.9e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 915C2 QC/VS/C 6.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 706C2 QT/HS/C 1.4e+1 6.3e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 702C7 QT/S/C 2.3e+0 6.6e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 713C1 VS/PT 4.5e+0 6.8e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 701C3 VS/PT 7.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 915C4 QC/VS/C 7.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 906C3 QT/PT 9.9e-2 7.4e-2 Out: Not MACTPM INC 825C1 CCS/QC/ESP 5.2e-3 7.5e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C 7.7e-2 Out: Not MACTTABLE B-1. PM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(gr/dscf)PM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 7.8e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C2 QT/PT 1.8e-1 7.8e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 707C9 QT/WS 5.2e+0 8.5e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscf, High variabilityPM INC 702C6 QT/S/C 3.8e+0 8.8e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 906C4 QT/PT 7.4e-2 9.1e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 702C8 QT/S/C 2.2e+0 1.2e-1 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 332C1 WS 1.2e-1 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 727C2 GC/C/FF 1.5e-1 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM INC 702C9 QT/S/C 2.1e+0 1.9e-1 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfTABLE B-2. PM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(gr/dscf)PM CK 315C1 FF 1.0e-3 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.6)PM CK 315C2 FF 1.1e-3 Source already in MACT poolPM CK 317C3 FF 1.7e-3 Out: Haz Waste not BurnedPM CK 317C1 FF 2.4e-3 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.3)PM CK 317C2 FF 2.7e-3 Source already in MACT poolPM CK 320C1 FF 3.0e-3 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.3), High variabilityPM CK 404C2 ESP 4.5e-3 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=580)PM CK 404C1 ESP 5.1e-3 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=580)PM CK 318C2 ESP 9.2e-3 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=434)PM CK 316C1 FF 1.1e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.3)PM CK 30151 FF 1.1e-2 In: MACT (FF), High variabilityPM CK 316C2 FF 1.2e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.3)PM CK 201C1 FF 1.3e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscf, High variabilityPM CK 322C1 ESP 1.3e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=370), Low SCAPM CK 203C1 ESP 1.4e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=220), Low SCAPM CK 200C1 FF 1.4e-2 Out: MACT (FF), High A/CPM CK 208C1 ESP 1.4e-2 Out: Not MACTPM CK 208C2 ESP 1.5e-2 Out: Not MACTPM CK 306C1 MC/FF 1.5e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)PM CK 406C1 ESP 1.8e-2 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=340)PM CK 207C2 MC/ESP 1.8e-2 Out: Not MACTPM CK 309C2 MC/ESP 2.0e-2 Out: Not MACTPM CK 335C1 ESP 2.0e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=420), Low SCAPM CK 302C1 ESP 2.1e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=250), Low SCAPM CK 202C1 FF 2.2e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)PM CK 405C1 ESP 2.2e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=470), Low SCAPM CK 308C1 ESP 2.2e-2 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=860)PM CK 303C1 QC/FF 2.2e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.3)PM CK 206C1 ESP 2.4e-2 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=500)PM CK 303C2 QC/FF 2.4e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)PM CK 202C2 FF 2.6e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.6)PM CK 207C1 MC/ESP 2.7e-2 Out: Not MACTTABLE B-2. PM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(gr/dscf)PM CK 309C1 MC/ESP 2.8e-2 Out: Not MACTPM CK 323C1 ESP 2.8e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=240), Low SCA, High VariabilityPM CK 402C1 ESP 2.9e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Low SCAPM CK 204C1 ESP 3.0e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=350), Low SCAPM CK 403C1 ESP 3.4e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=520), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)PM CK 30141 FF 3.5e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)PM CK 403C2 ESP 3.5e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=520), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)PM CK 319C1 ESP 3.8e-2 In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=1200)PM CK 401C4 ESP 4.1e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=240), Low SCAPM CK 30143 FF 4.5e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=0.9)PM CK 205C1 ESP 4.6e-2 Out: Not MACT (ESP, SCA=349)PM CK 401C1 ESP 4.7e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=240), Low SCAPM CK 401C3 ESP 5.1e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=240), Low SCAPM CK 304C1 ESP 5.9e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=?), Low SCAPM CK 305C1 ESP 6.6e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=340), Low SCAPM CK 30153 FF 6.6e-2 In: MACT EU (FF), High variabilityPM CK 401C5 ESP 6.9e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 300C1 ESP 7.2e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 305C3 ESP 7.3e-2 Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=340), Low SCAPM CK 402C5 ESP 7.8e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 305C2 ESP 7.9e-2 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscfPM CK 321C1 ESP 1.1e-1 Out: PM Emission > 0.08 gr/dscf, High variabilityTABLE B-3. PM, LWAKS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(gr/dscf)PM LWAK 225C1 FF 3.6e-4 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.3)PM LWAK 226C1 FF 1.0e-3 Source already in MACT poolPM LWAK 227C1 FF 1.5e-3 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.8)PM LWAK 223C1 FF 2.6e-3 Source already in MACT poolPM LWAK 224C1 FF 2.8e-3 Source already in MACT poolPM LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 5.9e-3 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.8)PM LWAK 313C1 FF 6.0e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.3)PM LWAK 311C1 FF 6.0e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)PM LWAK 312C1 FF 7.0e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.6)PM LWAK 336C1 FF 7.3e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=?)PM LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 8.1e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 9.7e-3 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.9)PM LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 1.4e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=3.0)PM LWAK 310C1 FF 1.6e-2 Out: MACT (FF), High A/CPM LWAK 314C1 FF 2.6e-2 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.3)TABLE B-4. MERCURY, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)Hg INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 4.8e+1 4.2e-2 MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 4.8e1)Hg INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 3.3e+1 1.2e-1 Source already in MACT poolHg INC 904C1 ? 1.5e-1 Source already in MACT poolHg INC 904C2 ? 1.5e-1 Source already in MACT poolHg INC 904C3 ? 1.7e-1 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.7e-1)Hg INC 216C7 HES/WS 2.5e-1 Out: No MTECHg INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 2.8e-1 Out: No MTECHg INC 906C3 QT/PT 3.6e-1 MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 3.6e-1)Hg INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 5.0e-1 Out: No MTECHg INC 712C2 NONE 5.4e-1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 4.1e+0 7.1e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1.9e+3 8.4e-1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 4.0e+0 9.3e-1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 9.0e+0 9.3e-1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg INC 500C4 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.1e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 1.1e+0 Out: No MTECHg INC 216C5 HES/WS 1.2e+0 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 725C1 WS/QT 1.6e+0 Out: No MTECHg INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 1.7e+0 Out: No MTECHg INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 3.5e-2 1.7e+0 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHg INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 1.7e+0 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 2.4e+2 2.5e+0 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 704C2 NONE 2.7e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg INC 704C1 NONE 2.9e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 9.1e+1 3.0e+0 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 3.4e+0 Out: No MTECHg INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 2.4e+2 3.9e+0 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 3.8e+1 3.9e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 9.2e+0 4.5e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 7.4e-2 4.7e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 7.7e+0 5.2e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM7.1e-1 5.7e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)TABLE B-4. MERCURY, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)Hg INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 2.0e-1 5.8e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 6.4e+0 Out: No MTECHg INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 6.7e+0 Out: No MTECHg INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 1.6e+2 7.6e+0 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 2.9e+2 8.0e+0 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 9.2e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS 9.5e+0 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM2.0e+1 1.1e+1 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHg INC 708C3 WS/ESP 1.3e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 9.7e+1 1.3e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 710C1 QT/OS/C/S 1.3e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 708C2 WS/ESP 1.4e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 1.5e+1 Out: No MTECHg INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 1.5e+1 1.5e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 216C6 HES/WS 1.6e+1 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 400C1 SD/FF 2.8e+4 1.6e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg INC 710C3 QT/OS/C/S 1.6e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM1.7e+0 1.8e+1 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemHg INC 708C1 WS/ESP 1.8e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 5.1e+1 2.1e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 1.7e+1 2.1e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 4.2e+0 2.4e+1 Out: MACT (WS), MB problem, High variabilityHg INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 2.2e+2 2.6e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 214C3 IWS 3.3e+3 2.6e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 9.7e+1 2.9e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 3.0e+1 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 3.2e+1 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 214C2 IWS 1.9e+3 3.7e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 331C1 PT/IWS 4.5e+1 Out: MACT (WS), No MTECHg INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 3.2e+1 4.7e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)Hg INC 337C2 WHB/DA/DI/FF 5.3e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 4.8e+1 5.9e+1 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/M (CO - 325C6/5), High variabilityTABLE B-4. MERCURY, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)Hg INC 216C3 HES/WS 6.6e+1 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 9.0e+1 Out: No MTECHg INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 9.1e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 710C2 QT/OS/C/S 1.0e+2 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 332C1 WS 1.1e+2 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 806C2 C/VS 1.2e+2 Out: No MTECHg INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 4.6e+1 1.6e+2 Out: MACT (FC), MB problemHg INC 806C1 C/VS 1.9e+2 Out: No MTECHg INC 329C1 PT/IWS 3.2e+2 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 4.7e+1 3.3e+2 Out: MACT (WS), MB problemHg INC 214C1 IWS 5.3e+2 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 9.3e+1 8.1e+2 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 4.4e+2 1.5e+3 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 504C1 VS/C 3.4e+3 1.9e+3 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, High variabilityHg INC 808C2 QT/PBS/ESP 2.0e+3 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 1.4e+4 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHg INC 784C2 NONE 3.2e+4 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg INC 784C1 NONE 3.5e+4 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTABLE B-5. MERCURY, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)Hg CK 201C1 FF 2.7e+0 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHg CK 303C1 QC/FF 9.8e+1 2.9e+0 Out: Haz Waste not BurnedHg CK 305C3 ESP 1.4e+5 4.0e+0 Out: MB problemHg CK 404C1 ESP 4.2e+1 4.3e+0 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 4.2e1)Hg CK 406C1 ESP 1.1e+2 5.1e+0 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.1e2)Hg CK 202C1 FF 6.0e+0 5.5e+0 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 6.0e0)Hg CK 203C1 ESP 4.2e+1 6.0e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 200C1 FF 1.0e+1 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHg CK 402C1 ESP 1.0e+4 1.6e+1 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 206C1 ESP 8.8e+1 1.6e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 207C1 MC/ESP 1.1e+2 1.7e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 305C1 ESP 2.3e+2 1.7e+1 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 204C1 ESP 1.1e+2 1.7e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 317C3 FF 1.9e+1 1.9e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 405C1 ESP 1.5e+2 2.0e+1 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 202C2 FF 5.7e+1 2.1e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 208C1 ESP 1.0e+2 2.1e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 317C1 FF 2.4e+1 2.4e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 205C1 ESP 5.9e+1 3.0e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 317C2 FF 3.2e+1 3.2e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 315C1 FF 3.4e+1 3.4e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 315C2 FF 3.5e+1 3.5e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 323C1 ESP 3.6e+1 3.6e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 401C5 ESP 5.7e+1 3.7e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 309C1 MC/ESP 1.5e+2 3.9e+1 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 335C1 ESP 4.5e+3 4.0e+1 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 322C1 ESP 4.4e+1 4.4e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 304C1 ESP 4.5e+1 Out: No MTECHg CK 402C4 ESP 4.3e+1 4.9e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 319C1 ESP 5.5e+1 Out: No MTECHg CK 303C3 QC/FF 3.8e+2 5.5e+1 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 302C1 ESP 6.1e+1 6.1e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)TABLE B-5. MERCURY, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)Hg CK 320C1 FF 6.9e+1 6.9e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 401C1 ESP 3.5e+2 8.4e+1 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTEC, High variabilityHg CK 316C1 FF 9.4e+1 9.4e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 207C2 MC/ESP 1.0e+2 1.0e+2 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 208C2 ESP 1.1e+2 1.1e+2 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg CK 301C2 FF 1.3e+3 1.1e+2 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 301C2 FF 1.3e+3 1.2e+2 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 308C1 ESP 1.7e+2 1.7e+2 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 316C2 FF 1.8e+2 1.8e+2 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 300C2 ESP 1.9e+2 1.9e+2 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 318C1 ESP 4.4e+2 4.4e+2 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 318C3 ESP 4.5e+2 4.4e+2 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 318C2 ESP 6.5e+2 6.5e+2 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 321C1 ESP 8.2e+2 8.2e+2 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 403C1 ESP 5.9e+1 8.7e+2 Out: MB problem, DL measurementHg CK 306C1 MC/FF 3.8e+3 3.5e+3 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 228C4 ESP 3.7e+4 3.7e+4 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 200C1 FF 4.1e+4 4.1e+4 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECHg CK 201C1 FF 4.2e+4 4.2e+4 Out: MACT EU (FC), High MTECTABLE B-6. MERCURY, LWAKS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)Hg LWAK 313C1 FF 4.6e+1 3.7e-1 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 4.6e1), High variabilityHg LWAK 225C1 FF 1.4e+1 4.7e+0 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.4e1)Hg LWAK 312C1 FF 4.2e+1 8.4e+0 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 4.2e1)Hg LWAK 310C1 FF 3.8e+1 1.4e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg LWAK 224C1 FF 2.9e+1 1.4e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg LWAK 311C1 FF 6.2e+1 1.5e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg LWAK 227C1 FF 6.3e+1 1.7e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg LWAK 314C1 FF 8.8e+1 2.5e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg LWAK 223C1 FF 4.5e+1 3.1e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)Hg LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 2.4e+3 4.5e+2 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 2.1e+3 4.7e+2 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 2.4e+3 5.0e+2 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 2.2e+3 5.4e+2 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg LWAK 336C2 FF 6.8e+2 6.8e+2 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHg LWAK 336C1 FF 8.0e+2 8.0e+2 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTABLE B-7. SVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)SVM INC 325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.3e+0 Out: No MTECSVM INC 712C1 NONE 1.9e-1 2.2e+0 Out: MB Problem, Sub. > 75%SVM INC 712C2 NONE 8.3e-1 2.3e+0 Out: MB Problem, Sub. > 75%SVM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 4.8e+4 2.4e+0 MACT source (VS/IWS w/ MTEC of 4.8e4) (FF as ET)SVM INC 222C5 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 2.8e+0 Out: No MTECSVM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 9.7e+1 2.8e+0 MACT source (VS w/ MTEC of 9.7e1) (Any PM control as ET)SVM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 4.0e+0 Out: No MTECSVM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 5.6e+3 5.8e+0 MACT source (ESP w/ MTEC of 5.6e3)SVM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.7e+5 7.0e+0 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 4.0e+3 8.3e+0 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS), High variabilitySVM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 8.9e+2 8.8e+0 In: MACT EU (ET ESP), High variabilitySVM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.3e+5 9.0e+0 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 2.2e+2 1.0e+1 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP 1.2e+1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 3.7e+3 1.2e+1 In: MACT EU (ESP)SVM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 1.2e+1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 1.2e+1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 3.6e+2 1.3e+1 Out: MACT (VS), High MTEC, High variabilitySVM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 1.4e+1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 1.6e+1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 2.0e+2 1.7e+1 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 1.9e+1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 7.0e+3 2.0e+1 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS), High variabilitySVM INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 5.2e+3 2.0e+1 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 1.6e+2 2.4e+1 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 9.2e+1 2.5e+1 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 1.4e+3 2.5e+1 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 6.2e-1 2.7e+1 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problem, Sub. > 85%, DL measurementSVM INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 2.4e+3 2.7e+1 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 2.8e+1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 3.2e+1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 1.1e+4 3.3e+1 In: MACT EU (ESP)TABLE B-7. SVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)SVM INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 4.6e+2 3.7e+1 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 349C3 QC/FF/QC/PT 6.0e+5 3.7e+1 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 504C1 VS/C 2.3e+4 3.9e+1 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.2e+2 3.9e+1 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 725C1 WS/QT 3.9e+1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 4.1e+2 4.8e+1 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM3.7e+4 5.2e+1 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 5.0e+3 5.6e+1 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (CO - 325C7)SVM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 8.9e-1 6.4e+1 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 216C3 HES/WS 7.1e+1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 4.8e-1 7.1e+1 Out: MACT (ET VS), MB problem, Sub. > 91%, DL measurementSVM INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 2.0e+4 8.2e+1 In: MACT EU (ET VS/IWS)SVM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 9.0e+1 Out: No MTECSVM INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 1.8e+2 1.0e+2 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 5.7e+3 1.1e+2 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (CO - 325C7), High variabilitySVM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 8.7e-2 1.2e+2 Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 214C1 IWS 1.4e+2 Out: No MTEC, High variabilitySVM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP 1.9e+2 Out: No MTECSVM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM1.9e+5 2.1e+2 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 7.6e+1 2.2e+2 Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 2.4e+2 Out: No MTECSVM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM 3.5e+2 2.4e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 4.1e+3 2.5e+2 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), Poor D/O/M (CO - 325C7)SVM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM2.4e+5 2.7e+2 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 2.8e+2 Out: No MTECSVM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 1.2e+0 4.4e+2 Out: Not MACT, MB problemSVM INC 324C4 ? 4.5e+2 Out: No MTEC, High variabilitySVM INC 324C1 ? 4.9e+2 Out: No MTEC, High variabilitySVM INC 806C2 C/VS 4.9e+2 Out: No MTECSVM INC 806C1 C/VS 6.0e+2 Out: No MTECSVM INC 324C2 ? 6.7e+2 Out: No MTEC, High variabilitySVM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 3.1e+5 7.2e+2 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECTABLE B-7. SVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)SVM INC 400C1 SD/FF 2.7e+6 7.5e+2 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF 6.6e+4 8.2e+2 Out: MACT (ET VS/IWS), High MTECSVM INC 214C2 IWS 1.9e+5 8.3e+2 Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECSVM INC 809C1 VS 2.0e+4 8.4e+2 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 324C3 ? 9.7e+2 Out: No MTEC, High variabilitySVM INC 216C7 HES/WS 1.0e+3 Out: No MTECSVM INC 216C5 HES/WS 1.0e+3 Out: No MTECSVM INC 810C1 Q/VS/PBS 5.6e+4 1.0e+3 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 1.0e+3 Out: No MTECSVM INC 216C6 HES/WS 1.1e+3 Out: No MTECSVM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C 1.2e+3 Out: No MTECSVM INC 214C3 IWS 3.2e+5 1.2e+3 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 1.3e+3 Out: No MTECSVM INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 5.8e+2 1.6e+3 Out: MACT (ESP), MB problemSVM INC 810C2 Q/VS/PBS 6.5e+5 1.9e+3 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 331C1 PT/IWS 3.7e+3 Out: No MTECSVM INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 9.0e+4 7.5e+3 Out: MACT (WS/ESP), High MTECSVM INC 809C2 VS 2.0e+5 1.9e+4 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 2.3e+5 2.6e+4 Out: MACT (VS), High MTECSVM INC 905C1 QT/VS/AS/CS 1.5e+4 2.6e+4 Out: MACT (VS), High MTEC, MB problemTABLE B-8. SVM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)SVM CK 320C1 FF 3.4e+4 2.2e+0 MACT source (FF, A/C=2.1, w/ MTEC of 3.4e4)SVM CK 316C2 FF 7.5e+4 5.1e+0 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.3, w/ MTEC of 7.5e4)SVM CK 316C1 FF 8.9e+4 6.2e+0 Source already in MACT poolSVM CK 321C1 ESP 2.3e+5 6.6e+0 Out: MB problem (SRE outlier for CK w/ ESP)SVM CK 30114C2 FF 8.0e+4 7.3e+0 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.2, w/ MTEC of 8.0e4)SVM CK 30115C2 FF 8.0e+4 1.1e+1 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2), High variabilitySVM CK 303C1 QC/FF 8.1e+3 1.3e+1 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.3)SVM CK 315C2 FF 1.6e+5 1.4e+1 Out: MACT (FF), High MTECSVM CK 315C1 FF 1.7e+5 1.5e+1 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.5), High MTECSVM CK 306C1 MC/FF 5.0e+4 1.6e+1 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.8)SVM CK 317C1 FF 4.7e+4 2.8e+1 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)SVM CK 317C3 FF 5.7e+3 2.9e+1 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)SVM CK 317C2 FF 5.6e+4 2.9e+1 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4)SVM CK 403C1 ESP 1.3e+5 3.0e+1 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 303C3 QC/FF 3.6e+4 3.7e+1 In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.3)SVM CK 201C1 FF 1.5e+5 4.8e+1 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=?), High MTEC, High variabilitySVM CK 404C1 ESP 6.1e+4 5.6e+1 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 200C1 FF 3.2e+4 6.8e+1 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=4), High A/CSVM CK 208C2 ESP 2.1e+4 8.4e+1 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 208C1 ESP 3.2e+4 8.9e+1 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 308C1 ESP 5.9e+4 9.0e+1 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 202C2 FF 2.2e+5 1.1e+2 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.5), High MTECSVM CK 318C2 ESP 1.2e+5 1.3e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 322C1 ESP 1.4e+5 1.5e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 207C2 MC/ESP 4.9e+4 2.3e+2 Out: Not MACT, High variabilitySVM CK 206C1 ESP 1.7e+5 2.7e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 401C1 ESP 4.8e+4 3.0e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 204C1 ESP 2.2e+5 4.7e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 207C1 MC/ESP 9.1e+4 4.9e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 203C1 ESP 1.6e+5 5.5e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 309C1 MC/ESP 1.2e+5 5.8e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 304C1 ESP 6.2e+2 Out: No MTECTABLE B-8. SVM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)SVM CK 319C1 ESP 6.2e+2 Out: No MTECSVM CK 406C1 ESP 1.2e+5 6.4e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 335C1 ESP 8.4e+4 7.0e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 402C1 ESP 2.1e+5 7.8e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 323C1 ESP 1.7e+5 8.6e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 302C1 ESP 3.8e+5 8.8e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 305C3 ESP 8.5e+4 9.1e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 405C1 ESP 9.1e+4 9.5e+2 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 305C1 ESP 1.5e+5 1.2e+3 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 205C1 ESP 1.4e+5 1.4e+3 Out: Not MACTSVM CK 401C5 ESP 1.0e+5 1.5e+3 Out: Not MACT, High variabilitySVM CK 300C2 ESP 4.7e+5 1.9e+3 Out: Not MACT, High variabilitySVM CK 402C4 ESP 5.2e+4 6.0e+3 Out: Not MACTTABLE B-9. SVM, LWAKS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)SVM LWAK 225C1 FF 2.5e+5 9.7e-1 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.3, w/ MTEC of 2.5e5)SVM LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 7.1e+4 3.0e+0 Source already in MACT poolSVM LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 7.4e+4 3.8e+0 MACT source (FF/VS, A/C=2.8, w/ MTEC of 7.4e4)SVM LWAK 224C1 FF 2.3e+4 4.0e+0 MACT source (FF, A/C=1.3, w/ MTEC of 2.3e4)SVM LWAK 223C1 FF 7.3e+5 5.6e+0 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1), High MTECSVM LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 6.6e+4 6.9e+0 In: MACT EU (FF/VS, A/C = 2.8)SVM LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 7.3e+4 9.3e+0 In: MACT EU (FF/VS, A/C = 2.8)SVM LWAK 227C1 FF 8.2e+5 2.0e+1 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=2.8), High MTEC, High variabilitySVM LWAK 310C1 FF 6.0e+3 3.4e+2 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=3.6), High A/C, MB problem (low SRE)SVM LWAK 312C1 FF 4.6e+5 4.2e+2 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.6), High MTECSVM LWAK 311C1 FF 3.9e+5 4.5e+2 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.8), High MTEC, High variabilitySVM LWAK 313C1 FF 7.4e+5 4.5e+2 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.3), High MTEC, High variabilitySVM LWAK 314C1 FF 7.1e+5 1.7e+3 Out: MACT (FF, A/C=1.3), High MTECTABLE B-10. LVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)LVM INC 342C1 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM2.2784Out: No MTECLVM INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS6221.7 3.1521MACT source (IWS w/ MTEC of 6.2e3)LVM INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM1029.8 3.4056MACT source (VS w/ MTEC of 1.0e3) (Any PM control as ET)LVM INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM4.2281Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C1 GC/C/FF5.7031Out: No MTECLVM INC 806C2 C/VS5.7783Out: No MTECLVM INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM7.2713Out: No MTECLVM INC 325C3 SD/FF/WS/IWS7.4155Out: No MTECLVM INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA348 7.6607MACT source (FF w/ MTEC of 3.5e2)LVM INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA393 7.665In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.0)LVM INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM7.7694Out: No MTECLVM INC 806C1 C/VS8.4371Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C2 GC/C/FF9.2378Out: No MTECLVM INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT1088.8 9.696Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS2730910.19Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 712C2 NONE2.6628 10.291Out: Not MACTLVM INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS3185210.96Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS4107011.994Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTEC, High VariabilityLVM INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM12.466Out: No MTEC, High variabilityLVM INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM25035212.885Out: MACT (ET VS.), High MTECLVM INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS6091.2 13.105In: MACT EU (IWS)LVM INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS834.08 16.57In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM16.611Out: No MTECLVM INC 351C3 GC/C/FF17.361Out: No MTECLVM INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP4530.3 18.015Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP8518.5 21.117Out: MACT (ET VS.), High MTECLVM INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT0.438 25.308Out: MACT (VS), MB Problem (Emission > MACT VS MTEC)LVM INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM27.18Out: No MTEC, High variabilityLVM INC 353C1 QC/VS/DM/ESP31.225Out: No MTECLVM INC 214C3 IWS6517731.83Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM21767232.188Out: MACT (ET VS.), High MTECLVM INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS7120.2 32.783Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECTABLE B-10. LVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)LVM INC 712C1 NONE1.3586 36.673Out: Not MACTLVM INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS1321737.073Out: MACT (VS), High MTEC, High variabilityLVM INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS624.08 37.35Out: Not MACTLVM INC 330C2 QT/WS/DM48.73 40.07Out: Not MACTLVM INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP1715840.617Out: MACT (ET VS.), High MTECLVM INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS3307.3 41.396In: MACT EU (IWS)LVM INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS120.93 43.728In: MACT EU (VS)LVM INC 725C1 WS/QT47.158Out: No MTECLVM INC 216C6 HES/WS50.699Out: No MTECLVM INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS1368.5 50.882Out: Not MACTLVM INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM27602653.766Out: Not MACTLVM INC 216C5 HES/WS55.603Out: No MTECLVM INC 331C1 PT/IWS55.764Out: No MTECLVM INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS506.22 56.654In: MACT EU (VS), High VariabilityLVM INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS3769.3 63.862In: MACT EU (IWS), High variabilityLVM INC 214C2 IWS3749065.242Out: MACT (IWS), High MTECLVM INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS802.55 66.117Out: Not MACTLVM INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM0.1596 66.746Out: Not MACTLVM INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS250.7 67.978Out: Not MACTLVM INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM72.025Out: No MTECLVM INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES57.592 76.709Out: MACT (VS), MB Problem (low SRE)LVM INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS586.6 77.463Out: Not MACTLVM INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM79.454Out: No MTECLVM INC 324C2 ?89.9Out: No MTECLVM INC 324C3 ?100.01Out: No MTECLVM INC 324C1 ?100.71Out: No MTECLVM INC 400C1 SD/FF654534110.91Out: MACT (ET VS.), High MTECLVM INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM8261.2 115.52Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 216C7 HES/WS129.36Out: No MTECLVM INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM133.72Out: No MTECLVM INC 504C1 VS/C118370149.71Out: MACT (VS), High MTEC, High variabilityLVM INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS10237151.01Out: MACT (VS), High MTECTABLE B-10. LVM, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)LVM INC 324C4 ?153.11Out: No MTEC, High variabilityLVM INC 905C1 QT/VS/AS/CS7121.2 185.14Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 353C2 QC/VS/DM/ESP207.53Out: No MTEC, High variabilityLVM INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT177.25 212.94Out: MACT (VS), MB Problem (low SRE)LVM INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM266 215.33Out: Not MACTLVM INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF4182.9 223.42Out: MACT (ET VS.), MB ProblemLVM INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM240513242.25Out: Not MACT, High variabilityLVM INC 503C2 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF522575254.05Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 216C3 HES/WS286.89Out: No MTECLVM INC 214C1 IWS358.2Out: No MTECLVM INC 810C1 Q/VS/PBS55266360.77Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 809C1 VS55733368.72Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT15136487.51Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTEC, High VariabilityLVM INC 915C4 QC/VS/C491.92Out: No MTECLVM INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT4009.5 517.04Out: MACT (ET VS), High MTECLVM INC 503C1 HTHE/ LTHE/ FF195714603.34Out: MACT (ET VS.), High MTECLVM INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS6721.8 704.62Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 810C2 Q/VS/PBS2E+06828.37Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 915C1 QC/VS/C862.86Out: No MTECLVM INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S993.67Out: No MTEC, High variabilityLVM INC 809C2 VS1E+067144.2Out: MACT (VS), High MTECLVM INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S11230Out: No MTECLVM INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S143828Out: No MTECTABLE B-11. LVM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)LVM CK 316C2 FF756484.2583MACT source (FF, A/C=1.3, w/ MTEC of 7.6e4)LVM CK 320C1 FF648694.4541MACT source (FF, A/C=2.3, w/ MTEC of 6.5e4)LVM CK 309C1 MC/ESP1357194.7769MACT source (ESP w/ MTEC of 1.4e5 and SCA of ?)LVM CK 303C3 QC/FF405365.1761In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.4), High variabilityLVM CK 321C1 ESP3742295.7739Out: MACT (ESP), High MTEC, High VariabilityLVM CK 204C1 ESP1666916.3483Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 308C1 ESP711107.4965In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=860)LVM CK 207C2 MC/ESP291168.4216In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?), High VariabilityLVM CK 206C1 ESP2280088.5663Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 316C1 FF985619.6483Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 208C1 ESP2951110.195In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 335C1 ESP5081510.709In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=420)LVM CK 315C2 FF27369010.919Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 315C1 FF28632111.454Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 306C1 MC/FF20345313.23Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 208C2 ESP2426513.69In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?)LVM CK 30142 FF5400016.6In: MACT EU (FF)LVM CK 30152 FF5400016.965In: MACT EU (FF)LVM CK 318C2 ESP1746118.622In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=434)LVM CK 303C1 QC/FF444618.686In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=2.3)LVM CK 205C1 ESP18935219.888Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 305C3 ESP6576320.288In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=340)LVM CK 302C1 ESP39326520.587Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 317C1 FF7877522.9In: MACT EU (FF)LVM CK 317C3 FF4120923.3In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.5)LVM CK 401C5 ESP1936023.684In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=243), High VariabilityLVM CK 317C2 FF91073 24Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 322C1 ESP17874726.266Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 203C1 ESP5451027.598In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=220)LVM CK 202C2 FF13423829.473Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 207C1 MC/ESP3095130.18In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=?), High VariabilityLVM CK 403C1 ESP7007332.895Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)TABLE B-11. LVM, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)LVM CK 305C1 ESP10596739.097Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=340), Poor D/O/M (low SCA)LVM CK 304C1 ESP40.238Out: No MTECLVM CK 402C4 ESP2464449.746Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)LVM CK 319C1 ESP63.515Out: No MTECLVM CK 323C1 ESP189028 80.3Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 300C2 ESP49408787.587In: MACT EU (ESP, SCA=370), High VariabilityLVM CK 404C1 ESP170044127.97Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 402C1 ESP232761163.21Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 401C1 ESP30551173.92Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=230), Poor D/O/M (older ESP)LVM CK 406C1 ESP127619183.49Out: MACT (ESP, SCA=340), Poor D/O/M (low SCA)LVM CK 405C1 ESP192573286.6Out: MACT (ESP), High MTECLVM CK 201C1 FF292880347.12Out: MACT (FF), High MTECLVM CK 200C1 FF381528384.55Out: MACT (FF), High MTECTABLE B-12. LVM, LWAKS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(μg/dscm)LVM LWAK 225C1 FF4103010.09Source already in MACT poolLVM LWAK 224C1 FF6678918.56MACT source (FF, A/C=1.5, w/ MTEC of 6.7e4)LVM LWAK 227C1 FF20823320.15MACT source (FF, A/C=2.8, w/ MTEC of 2.1e5)LVM LWAK 307C1 FF/VS12576031.861MACT source, (FF/VS w/ MTEC of 1.3e5), High variabilityLVM LWAK 307C2 FF/VS10136534.806In: MACT EU (FF/VS)LVM LWAK 312C1 FF12597835.342In: MACT EU (FF w/ A/C=1.8)LVM LWAK 223C1 FF8689035.604In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.2)LVM LWAK 311C1 FF12404736.162In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.9)LVM LWAK 310C1 FF5829.9 59.706Out: MACT (FF, A/C=3.6), High A/CLVM LWAK 307C4 FF/VS10406167.475In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=4.2), High variabilityLVM LWAK 307C3 FF/VS102667121.42In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=4.4)LVM LWAK 314C1 FF88970202.91In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4)LVM LWAK 313C1 FF118201294.3In: MACT EU (FF, A/C=1.4)TABLE B-13. HCL, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)HCl INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 9.8e+7 5.6e-2 MACT source (AS/IWS w/ MTEC of 9.8e7)HCl INC 347C2 C/QC/VS/S/DM 7.5e-2 Out: No MTECHCl INC 347C1 C/QC/VS/S/DM 7.9e-2 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHCl INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 1.4e-1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 808C2 QT/PBS/ESP 2.2e+7 1.5e-1 MACT source (PBS/ESP w/ MTEC of 2.2e7), High variabilityHCl INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 1.6e-1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 358C2 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 1.2e+7 1.8e-1 MACT source (VS/WS w/ MTEC of 1.2e7), High variabilityHCl INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 1.9e-1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 342C2 WHB/QC/S/VS/DM 2.1e-1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 354C3 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1.4e+7 2.1e-1 MACT source (AS/VS/IWS w/ MTEC of 1.4e7)HCl INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 2.2e-1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 706C3 QT/HS/C 1.7e+7 2.2e-1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 903C1 VS/PT/CA/HEPA 2.2e-1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 706C1 QT/HS/C 1.6e+7 2.7e-1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 708C3 WS/ESP 5.5e+7 3.1e-1 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHCl INC 600C1 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 3.1e+7 3.4e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 3.1e+7 3.4e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 337C2 WHB/DA/DI/FF 7.8e+4 3.5e-1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 728C1 QT/PT/VS 1.8e+7 3.9e-1 In: MACT EU (WS), High varabilityHCl INC 701C2 VS/PT 4.9e-1 Out: MACT (WS), No MTEC, High variabilityHCl INC 707C7 QT/WS 5.1e-1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 358C3 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.1e+7 6.3e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 6.3e-1 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHCl INC 325C4 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.2e+7 6.5e-1 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHCl INC 707C8 QT/WS 6.8e-1 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHCl INC 808C1 QT/PBS/ESP 2.6e+7 6.9e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 354C4 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 7.2e-1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 711C1 C/VS/AS 8.7e+5 7.2e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 708C1 WS/ESP 8.5e+7 7.3e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 344C2 QC/VS/PT/DM 7.5e-1 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHCl INC 346C1 C/QC/VS/PT/DM 7.5e-1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 707C1 QT/WS 7.8e-1 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityTABLE B-13. HCL, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)HCl INC 711C2 C/VS/AS 1.8e+5 8.3e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 500C4 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.7e+7 8.6e-1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.6e+7 9.1e-1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 214C3 IWS 5.1e+7 9.4e-1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 711C3 C/VS/AS 8.2e+5 9.6e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 344C1 QC/VS/PT/DM 1.1e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 4.1e+7 1.1e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 706C2 QT/HS/C 1.7e+7 1.1e+0 Out: Not MACT, High variabilityHCl INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM2.3e+6 1.1e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 708C2 WS/ESP 6.4e+7 1.1e+0 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHCl INC 341C1 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 4.5e+5 1.3e+0 Out: Not MACT, High variabilityHCl INC 347C3 C/QC/VS/S/DM 1.4e+0 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHCl INC 359C3 WHB/FF/S 1.4e+7 1.5e+0 Out: Not MACT, High variabilityHCl INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 2.8e+7 1.5e+0 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHCl INC 359C2 WHB/FF/S 2.3e+7 1.6e+0 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 214C1 IWS 2.4e+7 1.6e+0 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 341C2 DA/DI/FF/HEPA/CA 1.0e+6 1.6e+0 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 214C2 IWS 2.6e+7 1.7e+0 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 1.8e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 600C2 WHB/QC/PT/IWS 4.9e+7 2.0e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 2.2e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM1.4e+6 2.3e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 825C1 CCS/QC/ESP 3.4e+7 2.3e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 824C1 QT/VS/PT/DM 5.0e+6 2.3e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 707A2 QT/WS 7.3e+6 2.4e+0 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 358C1 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.7e+7 2.5e+0 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHCl INC 359C1 WHB/FF/S 2.1e+7 2.6e+0 Out: Not MACT, High variabilityHCl INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM1.1e+6 2.7e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 325C5 SD/FF/WS/IWS 1.9e+6 3.0e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 209C7 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.4e+7 3.3e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 209C4 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.2e+7 3.4e+0 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHCl INC 725C1 WS/QT 3.4e+0 Out: No MTECTABLE B-13. HCL, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)HCl INC 700C2 SD/RJS/VS/WS 1.8e+6 3.7e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 209C5 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 2.7e+7 3.9e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 209C8 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 5.0e+7 4.2e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 347C4 C/QC/VS/S/DM 4.4e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 902C1 QT/VS/PT 4.0e+7 4.5e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 504C1 VS/C 8.7e+4 4.6e+0 Out: Not MACT, High variabilityHCl INC 359C4 WHB/FF/S 6.8e+6 5.0e+0 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 229C3 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.9e+8 5.0e+0 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECHCl INC 707C9 QT/WS 8.1e+6 5.1e+0 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 209C6 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.7e+7 5.5e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 325C6 SD/FF/WS/IWS 3.4e+6 5.6e+0 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHCl INC 359C5 WHB/FF/S 7.8e+6 5.7e+0 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 6.5e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 714C4 WS 4.8e+6 6.7e+0 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 357C1 QC/VS/PT/IWS 1.1e+7 6.8e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 6.9e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 707A1 QT/WS 6.9e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 903C2 VS/PT/CA/HEPA 7.0e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 329C1 PT/IWS 1.7e+7 7.0e+0 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHCl INC 701C3 VS/PT 7.1e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 725C2 WS/QT 7.4e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 903C3 VS/PT/CA/HEPA 8.2e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 216C7 HES/WS 8.6e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 358C4 QC/VS/C/CT/S/DM 4.4e+7 8.8e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 707C3 QT/WS 6.7e+6 8.8e+0 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 705C2 QT/VS/ESP/PT 8.8e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 8.9e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 707C2 QT/WS 6.5e+6 9.3e+0 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 9.4e+0 Out: No MTECHCl INC 216C2 HES/WS 1.0e+1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 705C1 QT/VS/ESP/PT 1.1e+1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 707C4 QT/WS 8.8e+6 1.1e+1 Out: Not MACTTABLE B-13. HCL, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)HCl INC 340C1 WHB/ESP/WS 4.0e+6 1.2e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 325C7 SD/FF/WS/IWS 8.1e+6 1.2e+1 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHCl INC 334C1 WS/ESP/PT 3.5e+6 1.2e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.8e+7 1.3e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 210C1 FF/S 2.2e+7 1.3e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 2.7e+6 1.7e+1 Out: Not MACT, High variabilityHCl INC 339C1 AT/PT/RJS/ESP 3.6e+7 1.7e+1 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHCl INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 1.9e+1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 1.9e+1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 334C2 WS/ESP/PT 9.6e+6 2.0e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 4.0e+7 2.1e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 502C1 WHB/QC/PBC/VS/ES 9.5e+6 2.1e+1 In: MACT EU (WS), High variabilityHCl INC 340C2 WHB/ESP/WS 2.4e+6 2.1e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 324C4 ? 2.1e+1 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHCl INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 3.1e+6 2.3e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 211C1 FF/S 2.5e+7 2.3e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 701C1 VS/PT 2.5e+1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 713C1 VS/PT 5.1e+4 2.6e+1 In: MACT EU (WS)HCl INC 209C3 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 1.0e+7 3.1e+1 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/M (CO - 209C1/2)HCl INC 359C6 WHB/FF/S 6.0e+6 3.2e+1 Out: Not MACT, Poor D/O/M (CO - 359C1)HCl INC 714C3 WS 6.4e+6 3.2e+1 Out: Not MACT, Poor D/O/M (CO - 714C4)HCl INC 500C2 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.2e+7 3.6e+1 Out: Not MACT, High variabilityHCl INC 332C1 WS 3.8e+7 3.8e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 806C1 C/VS 4.2e+1 Out: No MTECHCl INC 806C2 C/VS 6.3e+2 4.7e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 906C2 QT/PT 4.1e+6 4.8e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 333C1 SD/FF 8.7e+6 5.0e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 229C6 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 2.2e+8 5.0e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, Poor D/O/M (CO - 229C3)HCl INC 330C1 QT/WS/DM 2.7e+7 5.1e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 210C2 FF/S 1.8e+7 5.4e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 714C2 WS 7.5e+6 6.0e+1 Out: Not MACT, Poor D/O/M (CO - 714C4)HCl INC 714C1 WS 1.1e+7 6.1e+1 Out: Not MACT, Poor D/O/M (CO - 714C4)TABLE B-13. HCL, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)HCl INC 333C2 SD/FF 1.3e+7 6.6e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 710C1 QT/OS/C/S 6.3e+7 7.4e+1 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/MHCl INC 710C2 QT/OS/C/S 4.9e+7 8.2e+1 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/MHCl INC 229C5 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 2.6e+8 8.6e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, Poor D/O/M (CO - 229C3)HCl INC 212C1 FF/S 3.1e+7 8.7e+1 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 714C5 WS 1.2e+7 9.0e+1 Out: Not MACT, Poor D/O/M (CO - 714C4)HCl INC 229C1 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.5e+8 9.1e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, Poor D/O/M (CO - 229C3)HCl INC 324C3 ? 1.0e+2 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHCl INC 710C3 QT/OS/C/S 4.5e+7 1.1e+2 Out: MACT (WS), Poor D/O/MHCl INC 906C1 QT/PT 5.7e+7 1.2e+2 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 324C2 ? 1.3e+2 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHCl INC 229C4 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 1.9e+8 1.3e+2 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, High variability, Poor D/O/M (CO - 229C3)HCl INC 704C1 NONE 9.1e+7 1.4e+2 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 906C3 QT/PT 5.2e+7 1.5e+2 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 229C2 WHB/ACS/HCS/CS 2.0e+8 1.6e+2 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, Poor D/O/M (CO - 229C3)HCl INC 906C5 QT/PT 7.6e+7 1.6e+2 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 324C1 ? 1.6e+2 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityHCl INC 704C2 NONE 1.1e+8 1.7e+2 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 906C4 QT/PT 6.6e+7 2.0e+2 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 703C1 WHB 5.4e+5 2.9e+2 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 703C2 WHB 4.6e+5 3.6e+2 Out: Not MACTHCl INC 784C1 NONE 8.7e+2 Out: No MTECHCl INC 784C2 NONE 9.4e+2 Out: No MTECTABLE B-14. HCL, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)HCl CK 204C2 ESP 1.7e+6 6.0e-2 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.7e6)HCl CK 301C1 FF 1.5e+6 2.2e-1 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.5e6)HCl CK 301C1 FF 1.5e+6 2.2e-1 Source already in MACT poolHCl CK 304C2 ESP 3.4e-1 Out: No MTECHCl CK 403C1 ESP 2.0e+6 4.2e-1 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 2.0e6), High variabilityHCl CK 403C2 ESP 2.5e+6 7.5e-1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl CK 202C1 FF 1.2e+6 8.6e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 315C1 FF 6.9e+5 1.3e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 303C1 QC/FF 2.9e+5 1.7e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 306C1 MC/FF 7.8e+5 2.1e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 405C1 ESP 2.5e+6 2.3e+0 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl CK 315C2 FF 5.7e+5 2.7e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 317C1 FF 3.0e+5 2.8e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 320C1 FF 4.2e+5 2.8e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 317C2 FF 6.2e+5 3.3e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 208C1 ESP 6.3e+5 4.0e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 207C1 MC/ESP 9.7e+5 4.3e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 321C1 ESP 1.6e+6 4.4e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 308C1 ESP 1.0e+6 4.5e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 303C2 QC/FF 1.2e+6 5.9e+0 In: MACT EU (FC), High variabilityHCl CK 317C3 FF 2.2e+5 7.2e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 401C5 ESP 2.4e+6 9.6e+0 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl CK 302C1 ESP 2.4e+6 9.7e+0 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl CK 402C4 ESP 3.4e+6 9.7e+0 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl CK 205C1 ESP 8.7e+5 1.6e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 200C1 FF 3.2e+6 1.7e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl CK 402C1 ESP 3.2e+6 1.8e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTEC, High variabilityHCl CK 316C2 FF 8.2e+5 1.9e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 201C1 FF 2.7e+6 1.9e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl CK 322C1 ESP 3.0e+6 2.2e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl CK 319C2 ESP 2.6e+1 Out: No MTECHCl CK 319C7 ESP 2.7e+1 Out: No MTECTABLE B-14. HCL, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)HCl CK 305C3 ESP 7.0e+5 2.9e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 202C2 FF 1.6e+6 3.2e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 316C1 FF 1.1e+6 3.3e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 300C1 ESP 2.1e+6 3.3e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 401C1 ESP 4.2e+6 3.3e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl CK 406C1 ESP 1.8e+6 3.4e+1 In: MACT EU (FC), High variabilityHCl CK 309C1 MC/ESP 1.0e+6 3.9e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 319C8 ESP 4.1e+1 Out: No MTECHCl CK 318C2 ESP 4.7e+1 Out: No MTECHCl CK 318C1 ESP 8.8e+5 4.8e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 404C2 ESP 2.7e+6 5.3e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl CK 319C4 ESP 5.4e+1 Out: No MTECHCl CK 309C2 MC/ESP 1.1e+6 5.6e+1 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 206C1 ESP 1.1e+6 8.0e+1 In: MACT EU (FC), High variabilityHCl CK 323C1 ESP 3.5e+6 8.3e+1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl CK 404C1 ESP 2.1e+6 8.7e+1 In: MACT EU (FC), High variabilityHCl CK 335C1 ESP 6.7e+5 1.1e+2 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 203C1 ESP 1.4e+6 1.1e+2 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 319C6 ESP 8.2e+5 1.5e+2 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl CK 305C1 ESP 1.5e+6 1.8e+2 In: MACT EU (FC)TABLE B-15. HCL, LWAKS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)HCl LWAK 224C1 FF 8.5e+5 9.6e-1 Out: MB problem (using lime injection?)HCl LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 7.8e+6 1.3e+1 Source already in MACT poolHCl LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 3.4e+6 2.2e+1 Source already in MACT Pool, High variabilityHCl LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 1.4e+7 2.4e+1 MACT source (VS w/ MTEC of 1.4e7)HCl LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 1.3e+7 2.8e+1 Source already in MACT poolHCl LWAK 225C1 FF 8.4e+5 6.0e+2 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 8.4e5)HCl LWAK 314C1 FF 1.9e+6 8.2e+2 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.9e6)HCl LWAK 310C1 FF 9.6e+5 1.2e+3 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl LWAK 311C1 FF 1.1e+6 1.2e+3 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl LWAK 312C1 FF 2.2e+6 1.3e+3 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl LWAK 227C1 FF 1.5e+6 1.5e+3 In: MACT EU (FC)HCl LWAK 313C1 FF 2.4e+6 1.5e+3 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECHCl LWAK 223C1 FF 2.3e+6 2.2e+3 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECTABLE B-16. C12, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)Cl2 INC 339C1 AT/PT/RJS/ESP 3.6e+7 1.3e-2 MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 3.6e7), High variabilityCl2 INC 700C2 SD/RJS/VS/WS 1.7e+6 4.8e-2 MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 1.8e6)Cl2 INC 338C1 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 4.8e-2 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 338C2 QC/FF/SS/C/HES/DM 5.0e-2 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 222C1 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 7.4e-2 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 354C3 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 1.4e+7 7.4e-2 MACT source (WS w/ MTEC of 1.4e7)Cl2 INC 222C3 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 9.7e-2 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 210C1 FF/S 2.2e+7 1.3e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)Cl2 INC 327C3 SD/FF/WS/ESP 1.3e-1 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 212C1 FF/S 3.1e+7 1.7e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)Cl2 INC 327C2 SD/FF/WS/ESP 1.9e-1 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 700C1 SD/RJS/VS/WS 3.1e+6 1.9e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)Cl2 INC 807C1 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM2.3e+6 2.0e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)Cl2 INC 327C1 SD/FF/WS/ESP 2.2e-1 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 222C6 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 2.8e+7 3.0e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)Cl2 INC 333C2 SD/FF 1.3e+7 3.2e-1 Out: Not MACT, High variabilityCl2 INC 354C4 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 3.2e-1 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityCl2 INC 807C3 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM1.1e+6 3.4e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)Cl2 INC 807C2 C/WHB/VQ/PT/HS/DM1.4e+6 3.6e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)Cl2 INC 329C1 PT/IWS 1.7e+7 3.6e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)Cl2 INC 500C3 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.6e+7 4.7e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)Cl2 INC 348C1 QC/AS/IWS 9.8e+7 5.0e-1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECCl2 INC 210C2 FF/S 1.8e+7 5.0e-1 In: MACT EU (WS)Cl2 INC 333C1 SD/FF 8.7e+6 8.2e-1 Out: Not MACTCl2 INC 222C2 WHB/SD/ESP/Q/PBS 1.0e+0 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 354C2 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 3.1e+7 1.0e+0 In: MACT EU (WS)Cl2 INC 209C1 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 3.8e+7 1.9e+0 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, High variabilityCl2 INC 354C1 QC/AS/VS/DM/IWS 4.1e+7 3.2e+0 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECCl2 INC 221C3 SS/PT/VS 3.2e+0 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 221C2 SS/PT/VS 3.5e+0 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 221C1 SS/PT/VS 4.7e+0 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 337C1 WHB/DA/DI/FF 5.0e+0 Out: No MTECTABLE B-16. C12, INCINERATORS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)Cl2 INC 805C1 QT/QS/VS/ES/PBS 3.5e+6 5.1e+0 Out: MACT (WS), DL measurementCl2 INC 211C1 FF/S 2.5e+7 8.1e+0 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, Poor D/O/M (FO - 210 and 212)Cl2 INC 500C1 QC/VS/KOV/DM 2.7e+6 8.6e+0 Out: MACT (WS), High variability, Poor D/O/M (CO - 500C3)Cl2 INC 221C5 SS/PT/VS 9.6e+0 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 221C4 SS/PT/VS 9.6e+0 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 914C1 ? 1.8e+7 1.6e+1 Out: Unknown APCSCl2 INC 500C2 QC/VS/KOV/DM 1.2e+7 1.8e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High variability, Poor D/O/M (CO - 500C3)Cl2 INC 332C1 WS 3.8e+7 1.9e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECCl2 INC 725C1 WS/QT 3.2e+1 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 209C2 WHB/FF/VQ/PT/DM 4.0e+7 4.1e+1 Out: MACT (WS), High MTEC, High variabilityCl2 INC 725C2 WS/QT 8.5e+1 Out: No MTECCl2 INC 710C3 QT/OS/C/S 4.5e+7 1.2e+2 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECCl2 INC 710C1 QT/OS/C/S 6.3e+7 1.5e+2 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECCl2 INC 710C2 QT/OS/C/S 4.9e+7 1.8e+2 Out: MACT (WS), High MTECTABLE B-17. C12, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)Cl2 CK 403C1 ESP 2.0e+6 1.9e-3 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 2.0e6)Cl2 CK 304C2 ESP 4.3e-3 Out: No MTEC, High variabilityCl2 CK 201C1 FF 2.7e+6 5.2e-3 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 2.7e6)Cl2 CK 200C1 FF 3.2e+6 1.0e-2 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 3.2e6), High variabilityCl2 CK 204C2 ESP 1.7e+6 1.1e-2 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 315C2 FF 5.7e+5 2.3e-2 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 315C1 FF 6.9e+5 2.5e-2 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 303C2 QC/FF 1.2e+6 3.5e-2 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 206C1 ESP 1.1e+6 4.1e-2 In: MACT EU (FC), High variabilityCl2 CK 403C2 ESP 2.5e+6 4.1e-2 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 317C2 FF 6.2e+5 4.7e-2 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 317C3 FF 2.1e+5 4.8e-2 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 317C1 FF 3.0e+5 5.0e-2 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 301C1 FF 2.9e+6 7.9e-2 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 318C2 ESP 8.2e-2 Out: No MTECCl2 CK 318C1 ESP 8.8e+5 8.4e-2 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 323C1 ESP 3.5e+6 8.5e-2 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECCl2 CK 309C2 MC/ESP 1.1e+6 9.4e-2 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 401C5 ESP 2.4e+6 1.2e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 309C1 MC/ESP 1.0e+6 1.3e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 305C3 ESP 7.0e+5 1.5e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 303C1 QC/FF 2.9e+5 1.6e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 306C1 MC/FF 7.7e+5 1.7e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 319C4 ESP 1.7e-1 Out: No MTECCl2 CK 406C1 ESP 1.8e+6 2.0e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 202C1 FF 1.2e+6 2.0e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 319C2 ESP 2.0e-1 Out: No MTECCl2 CK 322C1 ESP 3.0e+6 2.0e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 205C1 ESP 8.7e+5 2.0e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 402C1 ESP 3.2e+6 2.1e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 208C1 ESP 6.3e+5 2.3e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 301C1 FF 2.9e+6 2.8e-1 In: MACT EU (FC), High variabilityTABLE B-17. C12, CEMENT KILNS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)Cl2 CK 300C1 ESP 2.1e+6 2.9e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 207C1 MC/ESP 9.6e+5 2.9e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 305C1 ESP 1.5e+6 3.3e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 202C2 FF 1.6e+6 3.4e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 405C1 ESP 2.5e+6 3.7e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 335C1 ESP 6.7e+5 4.0e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 302C1 ESP 2.4e+6 4.7e-1 In: MACT EU (FC), High variabilityCl2 CK 319C8 ESP 5.6e-1 Out: No MTECCl2 CK 203C1 ESP 1.4e+6 7.6e-1 In: MACT EU (FC), High variabilityCl2 CK 308C1 ESP 1.0e+6 7.7e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 316C1 FF 1.1e+6 7.9e-1 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 404C2 ESP 2.7e+6 1.0e+0 In: MACT EU (FC), High variabilityCl2 CK 401C1 ESP 4.1e+6 1.0e+0 Out: MACT (FC), High MTEC, High variabilityCl2 CK 316C2 FF 8.2e+5 1.0e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 404C1 ESP 2.1e+6 2.0e+0 Out: MACT (FC), Poor D/O/M (CO - 404C2)Cl2 CK 320C1 FF 4.2e+5 2.1e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 321C1 ESP 1.6e+6 2.6e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 CK 402C4 ESP 3.4e+6 6.8e+0 Out: MACT (FC), High MTEC, High variability, Poor D/O/M (CO - 402C1)Cl2 CK 319C7 ESP 1.4e+1 Out: No MTECCl2 CK 319C6 ESP 8.2e+5 3.6e+1 Out: MACT (FC), Source category outlier, Poor D/O/M (CO - 319C2/4/8)TABLE B-18. C12, LWAKS, EXISTING SOURCES, 6% ORIGINAL FLOORSubst Syst EPA APCS MTEC Gas Conc. CommentsType Cond ID (μg/dscm) Median(ppmv)Cl2 LWAK 225C1 FF 8.4e+5 1.4e-1 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 8.4e5)Cl2 LWAK 307C2 FF/VS 1.4e+7 3.0e-1 MACT source (VS w/ MTEC of 1.4e7)Cl2 LWAK 307C3 FF/VS 7.8e+6 3.3e-1 Source already in MACT poolCl2 LWAK 227C1 FF 1.4e+6 4.3e-1 MACT source (FC w/ MTEC of 1.4e6)Cl2 LWAK 224C1 FF 8.5e+5 4.3e-1 In: MACT EU (FC), High variabilityCl2 LWAK 313C1 FF 2.4e+6 6.2e-1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECCl2 LWAK 223C1 FF 2.3e+6 6.3e-1 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECCl2 LWAK 307C4 FF/VS 1.2e+7 7.3e-1 In: MACT EU (VS)Cl2 LWAK 307C1 FF/VS 3.4e+6 9.9e-1 In: MACT EU (VS), High variabilityCl2 LWAK 314C1 FF 1.9e+6 1.9e+0 Out: MACT (FC), High MTECCl2 LWAK 310C1 FF 9.6e+5 2.2e+0 In: MACT EU (FC)Cl2 LWAK 311C1 FF 1.1e+6 7.4e+0 In: MACT EU (FC), High variabilityCl2 LWAK 312C1 FF 2.2e+6 8.1e+0 Out: MACT (FC), High MTEC, High variabilityTABLE B-19. SUMMARY OF ORIGINAL 6% MACT FLOORS FOR EXISTING SOURCESHAP Units Incinerators Cement Kilns LWA KilnsPCDD/PCDF TEQ ng/dscm none none noneMercuryμg/dscm 30 105 30Semi Volatile Metalsμg/dscm 60 60 60Low Volatile Metalsμg/dscm 80 80 80Particulate Matter gr/dscf 0.015 0.03 0.015HCl ppmv 25 60 1300Chlorine gas ppmv 1 1 2.5CO ppmv 100 none 100THC ppmv 20 20 20