alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harrington West Financial
Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the undersigneds best knowledge and belief:

(a)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 12th day of May, 2003.

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Harrington West Financial Group, Inc.
|                                     
|(Company)                          
|                                     
|                                     
|/s/ Craig J. Cerny                   
|                                     
|Craig J. CernyChief Executive Officer
|                                     
|                                     
|/s/ Sean Callow                      
|                                     
|Sean Callow
Chief Financial Officer  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

29
# Installation Support Employee Spotlight:  Derrik Griner

/ Published Dec. 11, 2015
RICHMOND, Va., 
**Name:** Derrik Griner              

**Organization:** DLA Installation Support at Richmond, Virginia

**Years of service:** (With DLA) two months     

**What is your job, specifically?** Vehicle Fleet Management assistant. I provide customers with vehicle support. 

**How does your work impact the overall mission of the DLA Aviation team?** By providing vehicle support to DLA employees I help ensure their mission success. 

**What knowledge, advice or suggestion can you offer to benefit those in your field, or even the entire workforce?** Stay true to yourself and always take responsibility in your accomplishments and mistakes.

**What are you usually doing when not at work?** I spend time with my family.

**What is your proudest accomplishment?** I served 14 years, 11 months with the Air Force and during my deployments to Iraq I was the lead vehicle commander for my convoy team. I was responsible for finding the most direct and safest route for the convoy. I was proud that our effort helped those on the front line complete their mission.

**Who is the most important person in your life?** My daughter.

**What are your favorite books?** Westerns. 

**What are your favorite television shows?** Westerns and war documentaries. 

**What are your favorite movies?** Any John Wayne movie and western or action movies.

**What type of music do you most enjoy?** Old Country.

**Where is your favorite place to vacation?** The mountains.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, (the Report), of Triton PCS, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, Michael E. Kalogris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Michael E. KalogrisName: Michael E. KalogrisTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 9, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Triton PCS, Inc. and will be retained by Triton PCS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filings of Triton PCS, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Dennis J. Stevermer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

|Date: December 12, 2003 |  | /s/ DENNIS J. STEVERMER
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | Dennis J. Stevermer    
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
# Hispanic Heritage Month Employee Spotlight - Luis Alejo

/ Published Oct. 4, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
*National Hispanic Heritage Month is observed yearly from September 15 to October 15. It is a time to celebrate the achievements, histories, traditions, and cultural diversity of Hispanic Americans whose heritage is rooted in 20 Latin American countries and territories.*

*In observance of 2023’s Hispanic Heritage Month, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation will feature employees of Hispanic heritage to appear in spotlights.*

**Name:** Luis Alejo

**Job Title:** Supervisory Inventory Management Specialist

**Organization:** Material Management Division, DLA Aviation at Warner Robins

**Years of service:** 9 years

**Please describe your job in a sentence or two**.  I am the chief of a materiel support branch where we manage hazardous material, conduct backorder mitigation, and source material required for the maintenance, repair, or overhaul of all military weapons systems or related equipment.

**How do you support the warfighter?**I support the warfighter by making sure all of my employees have the necessary training and knowledge to perform their jobs. Knowing how you are supposed to support the warfighter is the first step in providing them impeccable customer service. 

**The theme for this Hispanic Heritage Month in 2023 is “Todos Somos, Somos Uno – We Are All, We Are One." In your words, briefly explain what this means to you?**What this means to me is the pride felt for Hispanic heritage is collectively shared by Hispanics from many different countries, but there is also pride that is individual for our own unique origins. For myself, I am very proud of my Mexican heritage and my indigenous Hispanic roots. Therefore, we are all and we are one! 

**Tell us something unique about your heritage or country of origin.**I am originally from Mexico and am very proud to say that I am 56% Indigenous American. My origins are from the northern edge of the Balsas River Basin in Tierra Caliente, also referred to as the Hot Land. I was born in Cuernavaca Morelos, Mexico and the majority of my family are from the state of Guerrero, which means warrior.

**What is one thing you'd like others to know about your heritage?**My heritage is working hard, which is the ethic my father and mother instilled in me. I started working in agriculture in Florida and Michigan as a child, and from there I have steadily applied myself to succeed. Enduring that journey, it is a blessing to be working for and representing DLA.

**Why is it important to you that we celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month?**Celebrating Hispanic Heritage and other cultures helps to educate people. It is easy to form mistaken opinions about people you don’t understand. So, if celebrating cultures can promote good feelings towards different types of people, then it has done its job. At the end of the day, we are all human beings wanting a good and meaningful life.
#### H. C. Rorick, *Appellant,*vs. Central Farmers Trust Company as Successor Trustee, etc., *Appellee.*

143 So. 868.

Division B.

Opinion filed September 21, 1932.

Petition for rehearing denied November 2, 1932.

*Winters, Foskett <& Wilcox*and *Fras&t', Miett, Wall <& Efller*(of Toledo, Ohio), for Appellant;

*Chillingworth Simon*and *Loftm, Stokes & Galkins,*for Appellee.

Terrell, J.

Central Farmers Trust Company et al., brought suit to foreclose a mortgage and for other relief against Spitzer-Rorick Trust and Savings Bank et al. A demurrer to the bill was sustained. An amended bill was filed and defendant, H. C. Rorick appeared specially *761and moved to strike the amended bill in so far as it applied to him on the ground that it constituted a new and distinct cause of action. Rorick’s motion to strike was denied and this appeal is from that order.

The main question argued here is whether or not the amended bill of complaint stated a new cause of action.

It is not necessary and we do not decide this question. The ground of action against Rorick was predicated on the alleged insufficiency of the treasurer’s affidavit filed in the office of the Secretary of State and the Clerk of the Circuit Court on behalf of Home Acres Land Corporation as a prerequisite to transact business in Florida. "We have this date adjudicated the validity of that affidavit and held it sufficient. Spitzer-Rorick Trust and Savings Bank vs. W. O. Thompson, et al.

In view of this holding there was no personal or partnership liability against Rorick in the instant ease so the cause is reversed with directions to dismiss the bill as to him.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Davis, J., concur.

Buford, C. J., concurs in the opinion and judgment.

Brown, J., dissents.

Ellis, J., not participating.
2017-0955.

#### State ex rel. Davidek v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed. On motion to add addendum. Motion denied as moot.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ.; concur.
#### Harvest 12708 Riata, LLC, Appellant, v Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al., Respondents.

[61 NYS3d 903]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered September 1, 2016, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The loan provision requiring plaintiff borrower to deposit and maintain a certain balance in a reserve rollover account is unambiguous in setting a minimum balance *(see Greenfield v Philles Records,*98 NY2d 562, 569-570 [2002]). Plaintiff was thus barred from invading that minimum balance for disbursements for replacement tenant improvements and broker commissions when an anchor tenant’s lease terminated and was not renewed.

Concur — Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Gesmer and Kern, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Robert T. DeVincenzi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(i)           the Annual Report of LaserCard Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ended April 2, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LaserCard Corporation.




Date:       June 15, 2010




/s/Robert T.DeVincenzi


Robert T. DeVincenzi


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2013367EN.01004102.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/41

---

Action brought on 7 October 2013 — ZZ v EEAS

(Case F-101/13)

2013/C 367/74

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: EEAS

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision of the appointing authority of 19 December 2012, taking effect on 1 July 2013, no longer to grant the allowance for living conditions provided for in Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations of Officials employed in the Republic of Mauritius.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the appointing authority to abolish from 1 July 2013 all of the applicants’ allowances for living conditions under Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the appointing authority to abolish from 1 July 2013 all of the applicants’ allowances for living conditions under Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the EEAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EEAS to pay the costs.

---
No. 10-5884.

#### Geoffrey Brunick, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 940, 131 S. Ct. 355,

178 L. Ed. 2d 230,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7284.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 374 Fed. Appx. 714.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10 (mm)

                                Eaton Corporation
                         2007 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
                                   ITEM 15 (B)

                      EATON CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                 POLICY ON INCENTIVE COMPENSATION, STOCK OPTIONS
                        AND OTHER EQUITY GRANTS UPON THE
                        RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESULTS

It is a Policy of the Board of Directors of Eaton Corporation that, if the Board
determines that an Executive engaged in any fraud, misconduct or other bad-faith
action that, directly or indirectly, caused or partially caused the need for a
material accounting restatement for any period as to which a Performance-Based
Award was paid or credited to the Executive, the Performance-Based Award shall
be subject to reduction, cancellation or reimbursement to the Company at the
discretion of the Board. As used in this Policy, the term "Executive" means any
Eaton executive who participates in either the Executive Strategic Incentive
Plan I or the Executive Strategic Incentive Plan II, or both, or any successors
to those plans; and the term "Performance-Based Award" means incentive
compensation (whether awarded under the above Plans or the Executive Incentive
Compensation Plan or any other Eaton incentive compensation plans), stock
options, restricted stock or other equity grant awarded to the Executive
pursuant to any Eaton stock plan or similar plan, or any gain realized by the
Executive from the exercise of any such stock options, or the vesting of any
such restricted stock or other equity grant, during the twelve-month period
following the first public issuance of the incorrect financial statement.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.:
 
We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 2-50595,
33-5792, 33-31975 and 33-37518 on Form S-8 of Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. of
our report, with explanatory paragraphs, dated February 14, 1996 relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries
(debtor in possession, as of January 7, 1991) as of November 30, 1995 and 1994,
and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), shareholders' equity
(deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
November 30, 1995, which reports appear in the Company's 1995 Annual Report on
Form 10-K and in the 1995 Annual Report, which is incorporated by reference in
the Company's 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our report on the consolidated
financial statements refers to a change in accounting for postretirement
benefits other than pensions in 1993.
 
                                            /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Cincinnati, Ohio
February 27, 1996
#### Jacqueline Racer, Respondent, v Mazel, USA LLC, Doing Business as D-Hairemoval Beauty Concept, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 418]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered April 14, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff’s motion to strike the answer for failure to comply with discovery demands, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record establishes willful and contumacious behavior on defendant’s part warranting the sanction of striking the answer *(see generally Rosario v New York City Hous. Auth.,*272 AD2d 105 [1st Dept 2000]). Defense counsel’s affirmation in opposition to the motion demonstrates that defendant ceased cooperating in the defense of this action by failing to respond to counsel’s communications regarding the necessity of provid*438ing the outstanding discovery.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.
effect they had on his mental state, or how they rendered his plea 

involuntary. Therefore, appellant fails to demonstrate that the district 

court erred by denying these claims without conducting an evidentiary 

hearing. 2 See Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502, 686 P.2d 222, 225 

(1984). 

Second, appellant contends that the district court erred by 

denying his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. To prove ineffective 

assistance of counsel in the context of a guilty plea, a petitioner must 

demonstrate that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of 

reasonableness, and, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded 

guilty. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 58-59 (1985); Kirksey v. State, 112 

Nev. 980, 988, 923 P.2d 1102, 1107 (1996). We conclude that no relief is 

warranted on these claims. See Lader v. Warden, 121 Nev. 682, 686, 120 

P.3d 1164, 1166 (2005) (explaining that we give deference to the district 

court's factual findings but review the court's application of the law to 

those facts de novo). Appellant does not specify what alternative defenses 

counsel should have pursued or what laws counsel should have explained 

to him before he pleaded guilty. Similarly, appellant does not explain how 

requesting an accommodation for his intellectual disabilities during the 

plea canvass would have caused him to reject the plea. Therefore, 

appellant fails to demonstrate that the district court erred by denying 

these claims without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See Hargrove, 

100 Nev. at 502, 686 P.2d at 225. 

2For the same reasons, appellant fails to demonstrate that counsel 

were ineffective for failing to address the issue of his medications in the 

guilty plea agreement, plea canvass, or motion to withdraw his plea. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1907A e 
Gibbons 

J. 

J. 

Pickering 

Finally, appellant contends that the district court erred by (1) 

denying• his claim that the sentencing scheme in existence at the time of 

his sentencing was unconstitutional, and (2) "provid[ing] an incorrect 

analysis of the belated appeal and successive petition issue." Appellant's 

arguments regarding these claims are not clear and he suggests they are 

only being raised for preservation purposes. Accordingly, we decline to 

consider these claims. 

Having concluded that no relief is warranted, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 20 

Pitaro & Fumo, Chtd. 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A .43N:D