alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-6324.

#### Joseph R. Grooms, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 974, 131 S. Ct. 491,

178 L. Ed. 2d 311,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7924,

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 939.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Orson Valdez-Allen, Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 261]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Abraham Clott, J.), rendered April 13, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
No. 10-6507.

#### In re Jeffery W. Wansley, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 959, 131 S. Ct. 496,

178 L. Ed. 2d 316,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7888.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
# C_2016145EN.01002801.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/28

---

Order of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Colomer Italy v OHIM — Farmaca International (INTERCOSMO ESTRO)

(Case T-681/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 145/35)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Colomer Italy SpA (Sala Bolognese, Italy) (represented by: M. Ricolfi, F. Tarocco and C. Mezzetti, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock and N. Bambara, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Farmaca International SpA (Torino, Italy) (represented by: M. Caramelli and S. Fierro, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 October 2013 (Case R 1186/2012-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Farmaca International SpA and Colomer Italy SpA.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Colomer Italy SpA and Farmaca International SpA are ordered to bear their own costs and, each of them, half of the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Colomer Italy SpA and Farmaca International SpA are ordered to bear their own costs and, each of them, half of the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 15.3.2014.

1

---
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 12697A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–2417

Mr. Stephen Gowdy

Gowdy Brothers Aerospace, LLC.

Consultant for Topview, Inc.

8170 Old Carriage Court N., Suite #200

Shakopee, MN 55379

Dear Mr. Gowdy:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated May 1, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Topview, Inc. (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to your current 

exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 

61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and 

(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the 

petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You requested an amendment to change the company 

name from Django Greenblatt-Seay to Topview, Inc.1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

 

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the 

FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12697

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Topview, Inc. is hereafter referred to as the operator. All 

conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12697 remain in effect.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sagient Research
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Dated: October 17, 2005        By: /s/ BRIAN M. OVERSTREET
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Name:   Brian M. Overstreet
                                   Title:  Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                           Accounting Officer

                                       24

================================================================================
Deferral Election Form



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 Westar Energy Restricted Share Units 
 Deferral Election Form 
  
 James S. Haines, Jr. 
  
 Deferral Election For
125,000 Westar Energy Restricted Share Units 
 and Dividend Equivalents Granted Effective December 6, 2002 and 
 Vesting in Equal Tranches on December 6, 2005 and December 6, 2006 
  

	x	I elect to defer distribution of Westar Energy RSUs granted to me on December 6, 2002 and vesting in equal tranches on each of December 6, 2005 and December 6, 2006 and elect to
have all such RSUs distributed to me in equal annual installments over a five-year period beginning on the first business day following the 6-month anniversary of the termination of my employment with Westar Energy. 

  

	x	I elect to defer payment of dividend equivalents related to Westar Energy RSUs granted to me on December 6, 2002 and vesting in equal tranches on each of December 6, 2005 and
December 6, 2006 and elect to reinvest such deferred dividend equivalents in additional shares of Westar Energy common stock, which will also be deferred; provided, however, that following the termination of my employment with Westar Energy, all
dividend equivalents relating to all such RSUs, including dividend equivalents relating to shares of Westar Energy common stock acquired with deferred dividend equivalents, will be paid in cash and not deferred. 

  

	 ̈	I elect not to defer distribution of Westar Energy RSUs granted to me on December 6, 2002 and vesting in equal tranches on each of December 6, 2005 and December 6,
2006. 

  

			
	 /s/ James S. Haines, Jr.

	 	 December 2, 2004


	 Signature
	 	Date
Troop Support emphasizes inclusion during annual disability expo
 
  By Alex Siemiatkowski
  About 500 Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employees took the opportunity to learn more about how people with disabilities support the warfighter during the annual National Disability Employment Awareness Month Expo and AbilityOne Day event Oct. 26.
  Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton, DLA Troop Support commander, addressed more than 40 AbilityOne organizations and other nonprofit groups in attendance.
   “Everything you do has an impact on someone, somewhere, even if you don’t know them,” said Hamilton. “What I didn’t know prior to coming to Troop Support is that I have been the benefactor of the great work that you have done for 30 years now. Our young [service members] have been the benefactors of your great work too.”
   The AbilityOne program helps people who are blind or have significant disabilities find employment in many organizations that provide products and services for the federal government.
   This year’s theme for National Disability Employment Awareness Month is “Inclusion Works.”
   The annual expo and AbilityOne Day event gives those organizations a chance to exhibit the latest information available on the products and services they provide to support the warfighter.
   The event has taken place each year for more than a decade and is hosted by the DLA Troop Support Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Office.
   “This is what these folks do. This (event) demonstrates and raises people’s awareness that it is important, that inclusion works,” said Cowley. “We are raising everyone’s awareness that people with disabilities are productive and effective people.”
   The Wounded Warrior Project was represented at the expo for the first time. Michelle Ramos Domingue, a senior benefits liaison with WWP, said the event was a great opportunity to meet with active duty service members and make connections for job opportunities for their members.
   “I think this marries perfectly with the Wounded Warrior Project’s mission of honoring and empowering wounded warriors,” Ramos said.  “Knowing that there is a network out there that supports them in the workforce in helping them transition to civilian life.”
   Paul Cataldo, account manager with SourceAmerica, the largest employer of people with disabilities in America, appreciated Hamilton’s support.
   “To me, the most impressive thing was General Hamilton gave a wonderful talk about how much he reminded all of us of our role and how important we are to the warfighter,” said Cataldo. “Where we might not even realize being a good neighbor or doing our jobs well, especially if we are producing products for the warfighter, how important our job is in all of this.”
# Mentoring program welcomes former DLA vice director   

/ Published July 11, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, During a recent visit to Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, former DLA Vice Director Lt. Gen. (Ret.) Loren Reno shared his experiences with a group of associates in the Level I Mentoring Program. “The most important quality is serving, not gathering power and position,” Reno said. “Managers manage, leaders serve.”  With more than three decades of experience in military affairs and logistics, Reno’s presentation provided valuable insight into the qualities of leadership and the importance in learning from others.Since 2005, Land and Maritime has conducted immersive mentoring programs for associates in grades GS-9 and below, intended to expose and educate them to nine managerial and leadership subject areas. Topics include emotional intelligence, behavior based interviewing, stress management and how to conduct meetings.  Reno’s presentation titled “What Leaders Do/Top 5 Leadership Priorities” included tools for improving in areas such as serving, integrity, balance, vision, and communication. Six mentors and 27 mentees attended the June event. The visit was a joint collaboration between Level I Mentoring Program Manager Brenda Minnema and Leadership Development Association Program Chair Jamieson Duval. Following his discussion, Reno attended a luncheon with members of the LDA program. Neil Sheaffer, an acquisition specialist at Land and Maritime was one of the Level I mentees at the presentation. He said Reno’s philosophy about the responsibilities of leadership resonated with him the most. 
“Effective leaders not only lead, but also serve,” Sheaffer said. “It's by serving others and helping those they lead achieve their goals that leaders achieve their own goals.”  

Reno presented a collection of qualities that define a good leader, and following his presentation he gave each attendee in the audience the opportunity to add to the list. He stressed the importance of always seeking personal and professional development, while remaining humble throughout career progression.

“The most effective leader is the most effective servant,” Reno said. “No matter where you are in the chain, you need to follow – and do it well.”
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.4.1
 EXECUTION
COPY




---



##### 



RECITALS
   AGREEMENT
  Section 1
 Acquisition Sub-Limit
 Build-Out Sub-Limit
 Section 2
 [Signatures Follow in Next Page]
 1




---



##### 



CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
    
    DENALI SPECTRUM LICENSE, LLC,as Lender
    
    as BorrowerBy: /s/ Amin Khalifa
    
    By
    
    Denali Spectrum, LLCName: Amin Khalifa
    
    
    
    Its sole memberTitle: EVP & CFOBy
    
    Denali Spectrum Manager, LLCIts ManagerBy
    
    Doyon, Limited,Its ManagerBy: /s/ Daniel S. OsbornName: Daniel S. OsbornTitle: Assistant TreasurerDENALI SPECTRUM, LLC,as GuarantorBy
    
    Denali Spectrum Manager, LLCIts ManagerBy
    
    Doyon, Limited,Its ManagerBy: /s/ Daniel S. OsbornName: Daniel S. OsbornTitle: Assistant Treasurer
 2
No. 10-406.

#### Louise Root, Petitioner v. Fairfax County, Virginia, et al.

562 U.S. 1063, 131 S. Ct. 655,

178 L. Ed. 2d 481,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9412.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 432.
No. 10-5112.

#### Stephen C. Walker, Petitioner v. Constance Reese, et al.

562 U.S. 904, 131 S. Ct. 243,

178 L. Ed. 2d 162,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6611.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 872.
#### Weaver v. State Employees’ Retirement Bd.

05/17/2016

885 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 129 A.3d 585
Request for Information DVerse Corporation (FAA-2015-4906) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Armstead: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-4906).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date 

listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by January 25, 

2016. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 12:25 PM 

To: armsteadalex@gmail.com
No. 10-216.

#### Frederick Tarantino, Petitioner v. City of Hornell, New York, et al.

562 U.S. 1044, 131 S. Ct. 598,

178 L. Ed. 2d 435,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8821.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 68.
#### Jose Santiago, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[55 NYS3d 189]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered January 22, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, in this action where plaintiff was injured when he slipped and fell while attempting to walk on snow that had been pushed to the side of a walkway that was near the rear entrance of a building owned and maintained by defendant. Plaintiff alleges that he did not walk on the 16-inch-wide shoveled pathway made by defendant’s employee approximately a half an hour before the accident, because there was an icy *546condition on it and he believed that it would be safer to walk on the snow that was beside the shoveled path. However, defendant submitted evidence, including certified climatological records, showing that freezing rain and snow started falling approximately one hour before the accident, as temperatures were decreasing from 34 to 31 degrees. Under these circumstances, defendant is entitled to the storm-in-progress defense, because the evidence shows that the icy condition that allegedly forced plaintiff from the shoveled path developed during the snow storm that commenced shortly before the happening of the accident *(see Clement v New York City Tr. Auth.,*122 AD3d 448 [1st Dept 2014]; *Weinberger v 52 Duane Assoc., LLC,*102 AD3d 618 [1st Dept 2013]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant created or exacerbated the icy condition through its snow removal activities, or that the ice existed on the walkway’s shoveled path prior to the storm *(compare Ndiaye v NEP W. 119th St. LP,*124 AD3d 427, 428 [1st Dept 2015]). The record shows that plaintiff testified that he did not know how long the ice had been on the path prior to the accident and that he saw it for the first time when he fell. Plaintiff’s reliance upon his errata sheet to amend his testimony to support his claim that he saw the ice on the shoveled path from his window two days before the accident fails, because the testimony and amendments refer to snow on the entire walkway rather than ice on the path that was shoveled shortly before his fall. Furthermore, the record is devoid of evidence that defendant’s snow removal efforts during the storm made the walkway more dangerous, or that defendant was negligent in permitting the accumulation of snow on either side of the shoveled pathway to exist *(compare Santiago v New York City Hous. Auth.,*274 AD2d 335 [1st Dept 2000]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.
No. 10-6746.

#### Radine S. Coopersmith, fka Radine S. Downey, Petitioner v. Richard E. Downey.

562 U.S. 1092, 131 S. Ct. 796,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9587.

178 L. Ed. 2d 533,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
No. 10-5883.

#### Norris Lee Whitaker, Petitioner v. Debra Dexter, Warden.

562 U.S. 977, 131 S. Ct. 473,

178 L. Ed. 2d 315,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7915.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# C&E delivers ultra-light combat vehicles to paratroopers

/ Published July 26, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

A select group of paratroopers at Fort Bragg, North Carolina will soon have a new vehicle provided by Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support to increase their mobility.

DLA Troop Support’s Construction and Equipment supply chain awarded a delivery order for ultra-light combat vehicles for the 82nd Airborne Division’s Global Response Force in late June.

The vehicles will provide the GRF with a mobility platform that can be air-dropped with them, said Army Lt. Col. Joe Buccino, 82nd Airborne Division public affairs officer.

“What drove the requirement was the need to add flexibility, speed and mobility to the Global Response Force once it’s entered into an area,” Buccino said.

Buccino said that dismounted paratroopers can only move as fast as their feet can carry them without the capability provided by the vehicles.

“If they have to move quickly to a follow-on objective, they’re limited without that,” Buccino said.

The GRF is a U.S. military force that is in a high state of readiness and is able deploy anywhere in the world on short notice. That duty status rotates among the division’s three brigades every eight months.

Military-type, commercial modified vehicles, like those delivered to Fort Bragg, are supported by C&E’s Heavy Equipment Procurement Program.

“We have several manufacturers on long-term contract offering these military-type vehicles,” said Rob Spadaro, HEPP supervisor and program manager. “The ultra-light combat vehicles are basically a modified version of a commercial line.”

The 82nd Airborne Division has purchased vehicles through HEPP in the past, Spadaro said.

Other vehicles procured for military combat missions that fall under HEPP include forklifts, cranes, utility vehicles and fire trucks. The vehicles may be modified to include a rifle holder, heavy duty frame, ability to accept military standard fuels and a tan or olive drab paint color.

Another model of ultra-light combat vehicle has been used by the division during training exercises since last year. The ultra-light combat vehicles are still in the assessment phase and no decision has been made yet if they’ll see continued deployment and if they’ll order more.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on
Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This
certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the
Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this
certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




Date:
      August 6, 2009
                /s/
      Mark T. FrostName:
      Mark T. FrostTitle:
      Senior Vice President, Administration, Chief Financial Officer and
      Treasurer