alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Distribution Yokosuka’s Team of the Quarter

/ Published April 12, 2016
YOKOSUKA, Japan, 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Yokosuka, Japan’s, Storage Division has been awarded the Team of the Quarter award for their consistent work with process improvements with regard to distribution processes and inventory integrity.

This 81-person team is comprised of multi-national team members that include members from the U.S. military, U.S. Civil Service, and Japanese National employees.  Their varied high levels of skill engendered a 24 hour operational schedule managing the receipt, storage, issue, and COSIS of over 36,000 pre-positioned materials, contributing to the operational readiness of the organization in supporting the warfighter. 

The Storage Division proficiently processed the elaborate packing and handling of temperature sensitive pharmaceutical products for trans-shipment in the Pacific area of operations.  They expedited the processing of over 18,000 vials of Japanese encephalitis vaccine in support of military hospitals and clinics across the Pacific and Fifth Fleet area of responsibility.  Additionally, this division also processed the transshipment of over 1,000 doses of the influenza virus vaccine in support of the U.S. Navy-wide mandated flu vaccination program.  Both shipments combined were valued well over 3.5 million.  

In best efforts to support the warfighters, the Storage Division responded to the Navy’s logistics requirements to support the weapons system modernization upgrades assisting kitting of over 6,000 line items for both the USS JOHN S. MCCAIN and the USS BLUE RIDGE.  

“The Storage Division Team’s performance this past quarter has been impressive.   They certainly epitomize the team concept and exhibit the collaborative spirit that is most deserving of this recognition,” said Prospero Rivera, director of DLA Distribution Yokosuka.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                       Duquesne Light Company Directors

     David D. Marshall. Age 47.  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
     -----------------
of DQE since June 1999. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Duquesne Light
since August 1999. Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Duquesne
Light from June 1999 to August 1999.  President and Chief Executive Officer of
DQE and Duquesne Light from August 1996 to June 1999.  Executive Vice President
of DQE and President and Chief Operating Officer of Duquesne Light from February
1995 to August 1996.  Directorships include DQE, Inc., Allegheny Conference on
Community Development and the Duquesne Club.

     John R. Marshall.  Age 50.  President of Duquesne Light since August 1999.
     ----------------
Previously Vice President--Consumer and Small Business Market Unit of Entergy
Corporation from 1996 to August 1999.  Vice President--Information Systems of
Entergy Corporation from 1995 to 1996.

     Morgan K. O'Brien. Age 40.  Executive Vice President--Corporate
     -----------------
Development of DQE since January 2000. Vice President--Corporate Development of
DQE from July 1999 to January 2000. Vice President, Controller and Treasurer of
DQE from November 1998 to July 1999. Vice President and Controller of DQE from
November 1997 to November 1998. Controller of DQE from October 1995 to November
1997. Assistant Controller of DQE from December 1993 to October 1995. Vice
President--Finance of Duquesne Light since November 24, 1998. Vice President--
Finance, Treasurer and Controller of Duquesne Light from November 1 to November
24, 1998. Vice President and Controller of Duquesne Light from October 1997 to
November 1, 1998. Controller of Duquesne Light from October 1995 to April 1996
and September 24, 1996 to October 1997. Assistant Controller of Duquesne Light
from December 1993 to October 1995.

     Victor A. Roque.  Age 53.  Executive Vice President and General Counsel of
     ---------------
DQE and Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Duquesne Light since
November 1998.  Vice President and General Counsel of DQE and Duquesne Light
from April 1995 to November 1998.  Directorships include Pennsylvania Business
Roundtable, Hill House Association, Urban League of Pittsburgh and United Way
Good Neighbors Advisory Committee.

     Jack E. Saxer, Jr.  Age 56.  Vice President of DQE since April 1996.
     -----------------
Assistant Vice President--Administration of Duquesne Light from January 1995 to
April 1996.  Directorships include Point Venture and Pittsburgh Consumer Health
Coalition.

     Gary L. Schwass.  Age 54.  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
     ---------------
Officer of DQE and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Duquesne
Light since February 1995.  Directorships include Western Pennsylvania
Development Credit Corporation, Holy Family Foundation and Financial Executives
Institute, Pittsburgh Chapter.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 50515 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**
versus **David Olmos,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:21

- CR

- 146

- 1

**______________________________** Before **Stewart, Duncan,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Olmos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Olmos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel evant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 2, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50515 Document: 00516633352 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/02/2023No. 22

- 50515

2 with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further respo nsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2
. Case: 22-50515 Document: 00516633352 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/02/2023
# C_2014052EN.01002901.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/29

---

Appeal brought on 4 December 2013 by Roca against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 16 September 2013 in Case T-412/10 Roca v Commission

(Case C-638/13 P)

2014/C 52/52

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Roca (represented by: P. Vidal Martínez, abogada)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the arguments put forward by Roca in the present case; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the arguments put forward by Roca in the present case;

| — | set aside in part the judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 in Case T-412/10; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside in part the judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 in Case T-412/10;

| — | uphold Roca’s claims and reduce the fine imposed on it; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold Roca’s claims and reduce the fine imposed on it;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by Roca in the present case, as well as those incurred in Case T-412/10 in so far as the same grounds are concerned. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by Roca in the present case, as well as those incurred in Case T-412/10 in so far as the same grounds are concerned.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

| 1. | First ground of appeal
  , alleging breach of the obligation to state reasons and the principles of non-discrimination and equal treatment as regards the assessment of the lesser gravity of Roca’s infringement because of the smaller range of goods concerned by the infringement, and distortion of the findings of fact in the decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First ground of appeal
  , alleging breach of the obligation to state reasons and the principles of non-discrimination and equal treatment as regards the assessment of the lesser gravity of Roca’s infringement because of the smaller range of goods concerned by the infringement, and distortion of the findings of fact in the decision.

First ground of appeal

| 2. | Second ground of appeal
  , alleging error of law in the application of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and breach of the principles of equal treatment and protection of legitimate expectations in the application of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. (1) |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second ground of appeal
  , alleging error of law in the application of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and breach of the principles of equal treatment and protection of legitimate expectations in the application of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. (1)

Second ground of appeal

1

---

(1)  OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2.

1

---
2023667346 OSTW85-121-XEWCP24 09:40:31a.m. 10- S10-101007-008 

dungresa ai i\}e Huitvi States 

Hlasifhiytoii, JD(E l'0;"il3 

3—<-

o;^ " .-:e:) 

Wednesday, October 6, 2010 ^ >^ 

*-^—] i -^ ^ 

The Honorable Ray LaHood > ^§— ' 

Secretary _o o^ ^ 

Department of Transportation ^ ^ ' 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE ^ ,_ P 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

We are writing to express our support for Sonoma County's grant application to the Department 

of Transportation's Small Community Air Service Grant Program. This funding will help launch 

a marketing campaign to stimulate in-bound air travel from three major markets: Seattle, 

Portland, and Los Angeles. 

It is our understanding that the increased tourism facilitated by this program will have an $11 

million increase in visitor spending in our local community, [t would provide a much needed 

boost to local tourism and visitor bureaus, hotels, car rentals, and airline companies in an area 

built around a tourist economy. 

We urge you to give this proposal your full and careful consideration. If you have any questions 

or comments, please do not hesitate to contact Chris Rogers in Congresswoman Woolsey's office 

at (707) 542-7182 or Tim Daly in Congressman Thompson's office at (202) 226-7367. We 

thank you for your time and attention on this matter. 

Sincerely, 

LynA Woolsey Q Mike Thompson 

Member of Congress Member of Congress 

LW:cjr 

i'>!..";i•:•_• -.Vi M crf.i i.r- PAPfn
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Quincy Deshan Butler v. Bank of America

Appellate case number: 01-19-00172-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-40373

Trial court: 55th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: February 4, 2020

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is granted. We withdraw our January 16, 2020

opinion and judgment and reinstate this case on the Court’s active docket.

The clerk’s record was filed on June 27, 2019. On April 26, 2019, the court reporter 

informed this Court that no reporter’s record was taken. Appellant filed his brief on July 22, 2019. 

Appellee has not filed a brief. Accordingly, this case is now at issue and ready to be set for 

submission. 

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Sherry Radack_____

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Hightower.

Date: ___April 14, 2020_____
**Exhibit 32.2**     The following certification accompanies Dynamics ResearchCorporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2005 and is not filed as providedin Item 601(b)(32)(ii) ofRegulation S-K ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission.Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002     In connection with the Annual Report onForm 10-K ofDynamics Research Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the“Company”), for the year ended December 31, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to hisknowledge:          (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to    Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as    amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     By      /s/ David Keleher         David Keleher  *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* Date: March 14, 2006
Exhibit
32.2








The
following certification accompanies Dynamics Research Corporation’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and is not filed as
provided in Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes—Oxley
Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dynamics Research Corporation,
a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:





(1) the
Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March
      17, 2008
            /s/
      David KeleherSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
  Treasurer
NUMBER 13-15-00158-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MELISSA MARIE GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

DAVID R. DE JESUS, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 156th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Melissa Marie Garcia, appeals a judgment rendered against her in favor 

of David R. De Jesus on a breach of contract claim. This cause was abated on May 6, 

2015 to allow the parties to this appeal to mediate. The parties have now filed an agreed 

motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice on grounds that they have settled and 

compromised this matter. 
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s agreed motion 

to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). Accordingly, we REINSTATE the appeal and we GRANT the agreed 

motion to dismiss. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. In accordance 

with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See

id. R. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the 

appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing 

will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

16th day of July, 2015.
No. 10-6227.

#### Debra Williams, aka Margaret McCarthy, Petitioner v. Aristedes W. Zavares, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 987, 131 S. Ct. 426,

178 L. Ed. 2d 332,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8174,

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
# C_2018436EN.01006401.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/64

---

Order of the General Court of 8 October 2018 — alfavet Tierarzneimittel v EUIPO — Millet Innovation (Epibac)

(Case T-613/13) (1)

(2018/C 436/89)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.

---
No. 10-6326.

#### Joseph Morales, Petitioner v. Shirlee Harry, Warden.

562 U.S. 1014, 131 S. Ct. 530,

178 L. Ed. 2d 390,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8474,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DYNASIL CORPORATION OF AMERICA
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), We, Craig T Dunham, President and Chief Executive Officer of The
Company and Laura Lunardo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
        of The Company.



                                /s/ Craig T Dunham
                              -------------------
                              Craig T Dunham
                              President and Chief Executive
                              Officer


                                /s/ Laura Lunardo
                              -------------------
                              Laura Lunardo
                              Chief Financial Officer

December 30, 2008
#### Mara Kirsh et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[768 NYS2d 819]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered July 17, 2000, inter alia, granting defendants-respondents’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and (7) to dismiss the complaint as against them, is, as limited by the brief, deemed taken from the ensuing judgment of the same court and Justice, entered May 7, 2002, insofar as it dismissed plaintiffs’ fourth and fifth causes of action, and, as so considered, that part of the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the July 17, 2000 order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The issues raised by plaintiffs in their fourth cause of ac*354tion—alleging that defendants-respondents breached their fiduciary obligation by failing to return plaintiffs’ property and by failing to turn over to plaintiffs surplus income generated by their building during the period of RPAPL article 7-A administration—and in their fifth cause of action—alleging that the article 7-A administrators mismanaged the building and that defendants-respondents breached their duty to supervise the administrators—were raised and decided in the prior federal action, *Kirsh v City of New York*(1997 WL 375684, 1997 US Dist LEXIS 9659 [SD NY, July 7, 1997], *affd*159 F3d 1347 [2d Cir 1998]). Inasmuch as plaintiffs had a full and fair opportunity to litigate these issues in the federal action, they are collaterally estopped from relitigating the issues in this action (see *Pinnacle Consultants v Leucadia Natl. Corp.,*94 NY2d 426, 431-432 [2000]; *Browning Ave. Realty Corp. v Rubin,*207 AD2d 263, 265-266 [1994], *lv denied*85 NY2d 804 [1995]).

Although plaintiffs allude to a claim against defendants-respondents alleging that they violated a 1991 Civil Court order directing the payment of sufficient property taxes on the subject building to avoid foreclosure, no such claim is alleged in the complaint. We note, in any event, that the property taxes owing at the time of the 1991 order were, in fact, paid to the extent necessary to avoid foreclosure, and that the existence of any continuing obligation on defendants-respondents’ part to see that property taxes were paid would not stem from the 1991 order but would necessarily be premised upon the theory, decisively rejected in the federal action, that defendants-respondents were legally answerable for mismanagement by the article 7-A administrators. Concur—Buckley P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
# Holiday message from DLA Director Lt. Gen. Andy Busch

/ Published Dec. 18, 2015

Twenty years ago, I was assigned to Headquarters Defense Logistics Agency in the old Materiel Management Organization. It would be an understatement to say that much has changed around the world since 1995, particularly for the organizations we support, but the one thing that has not changed is our continued commitment to innovative and responsive Warfighter support.

Around the world, the spirit of this season reflects a dedication to helping those in need, and no one does this better than DLA. Over the past year, you have supported refugees from war-torn countries,  firefighters on the West Coast, and many more activities with your hard work and commitment to delivering global solutions on time every time.

During the past year as your Director, I’ve seen firsthand the work you do here and at our forward-deployed locations. As you spend time with family over the holidays, be proud of the work you do for those who keep us safe and secure. Know that the impact you have on lives all around the world is substantial and truly valued.

The new year will bring challenges and uncertainty, but it will also create many opportunities for success. It takes hard work to realize our goals and overcome the ever-evolving challenges we face as America’s Combat Logistics Support Agency. I am proud to once again be a member of the DLA team, and I firmly believe we will continue to seek excellence and provide exceptional global logistics support now and in the future.

Happy holidays to everyone.

--Lt. Gen. Busch