alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Notice of Meeting and Correction of Meeting Notice

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a 
correction of a notice of meeting of the SAMHSA National Advisory 
Council and of the meeting of the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment 
(CSAT) National Advisory Council to be held in January 1998.
    Public notice was given in the Federal Register on January 8, 1998 
(Volume 63, Number 5, page 1120) that the SAMHSA National Advisory 
Council would be meeting on January 21, 1998, at the Parklawn Building, 
Room 17-89. The date of this meeting has subsequently changed to 
January 22, 1998. The agenda of the meeting and the contact for 
additional information remain as announced.
    With regard to the CSAT National Advisory Council meeting, a 
portion of the meeting will be open and include discussion of the 
Center's policy issues and current administrative, legislative, and 
program developments. If anyone needs special accommodations for 
persons with disabilities please notify the Contact listed below.
    The meeting will include the discussion of information about the 
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment's procurement plans. Therefore a 
portion of the meeting will be closed to the public as determined by 
the Administrator, SAMHSA, in accordance with Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3) 
and 5 U.S.C. App. 2, section 10(d).
    A summary of the meeting and roster of council members may be 
obtained from: Mrs. Marjorie Cashion, CSAT, National Advisory Council, 
Rockwall II Building, Suite 619, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 
20857, Telephone: (301) 443-8923.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the contact 
whose name and telephone number is listed below.
    Committee Name: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, National 
Advisory Council.
    Meeting Date: January 27, 1998--8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m; January 28, 
1998--9:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m.
    Place: Omni Shoreham Hotel, Hampton Room, 2500 Calvert Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20008.
    Type: Closed: January 27, 1998--8:30 a.m.-9:00 a.m. Open: January 
27, 1998--9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; January 28, 1998--9:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m.
    Contact: Marjorie M. Cashion, Executive Secretary, Telephone: (301) 
443-8923, and FAX: (301) 480-6077.
    This notice is being published with less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

    Dated: January 20, 1998.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-1611 Filed 1-20-98; 12:12 pm]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-U
No. 10-5151.

#### Gwen Bittan, Petitioner v. Hawaii Department of Human Services.

562 U.S. 906, 131 S. Ct. 250,

178 L. Ed. 2d 166,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7138,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Hawaii denied.

Same case below, 123 Hawaii 1, 229 P.3d 1066.
| Dated: August 22, 2013 |   | /s/ John Williams        |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | John Williams                 |   |
|                        |   | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|                        |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

| Dated: August 22, 2013 |   | /s/ John Williams                            |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | John Williams                                |   |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer                      |   |
|                        |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |
No. 10-6466.

#### Harold John Holmes, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 989, 131 S. Ct. 433,

178 L. Ed. 2d 336,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8308,

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 35167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17121]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IL85-1b; FRL-6115-8]


Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan; Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve an Indiana State Implementation 
Plan (SIP) revision request, dated July 24, 1997, submitted to EPA to 
complete requirements for record keeping and reporting requirements and 
other related requirements for the control of Volatile Organic Compound 
(VOC) emissions from graphic arts sources. In the final rules section 
of this Federal Register, the EPA is approving the State's request as a 
direct final rule without prior proposal because EPA views this action 
as noncontroversial and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed 
rationale for the State's request is set forth in the direct final 
rule. The direct final rule will become effective without further 
notice unless the EPA receives relevant adverse written comment on this 
proposed rule. Should the EPA receive such comment, it will publish a 
final rule informing the public that the direct final rule did not take 
effect and such public comment received will be addressed in a 
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. If no adverse 
written comments are received, the direct final rule will take effect 
on the date stated in that document and no further activity will be 
taken on this proposed rule. EPA does not plan to institute a second 
comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on 
this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or 
before July 29, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, 
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    Copies of the State submittal are available for inspection at: 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward Doty, Environmental Scientist, 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886 6057.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the direct 
final rule published in the final rules section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: June 2, 1998.
David A. Ulrich,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region V.
[FR Doc. 98-17121 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
No. 10-6478.

#### Raheem Taylor, Petitioner v. New Jersey, et al.

562 U.S. 1048, 131 S. Ct. 607,

178 L. Ed. 2d 442,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8989,

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 250.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerold
J. Goade, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jerold J. Goade, Jr.
Jerold J. Goade, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President

May 19, 2003
# Employee Spotlight Charles Pardee

/ Published Oct. 19, 2016
Richmond, Va., 
Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs. For more information, call (804) 279-3139

**Name:** Charles Pardee

**Organization:**  Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, Supplier Operations Original Equipment Manufacturer Directorate's Aviation Engines and Auxiliary Components Division

**Years of Service:** 4 years

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?** My job title is a quality assurance specialist. I provide technical/quality expertise, determine and initiate necessary product testing, maintain item-specific data requirements and master data, and address product-related complaints. As the authority on items managed by DLA Aviation, I participate in the vendor evaluation process and function as an expert liaison for personnel agency-wide.

**What do you like most about your job?** I get great satisfaction in knowing that what I do directly impacts the DLA mission of supporting the warfighter.

**What kind(s) of training and education helps your work performance in your current role?** Coming up through the former Pathway to Career Excellence (PACER) program, I was fortunate to receive the majority of my training prior to actually doing my job. It gave me the time to understand the processes and the systems.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction?** I actually get great satisfaction out of solving problems and knowing I’m giving the support back to the guys on the flight line. I’ve been there waiting on parts and have had to cannibalize parts from one aircraft to another because of non-availability. It’s important to know your role and how it affects the mission. 

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?** Stay focused and know we are all in the fight together.****

**What was your first job?** My first job was as a grocery bagger at Sunshine Foodway in Naples, Florida.

**What advice would you have given yourself 10 years ago?** I would have said to myself, “Don’t panic, retirement isn’t all that bad!”

**Do you have an unfulfilled wish?** Yes, I wish I was taller.

**What’s your biggest pet peeve?** People who don’t show respect for their country.

**Who is the most influential person in your life...past or present?** I would have to say that would be my father. He has always been honest and forthcoming. 

**What is your favorite military aircraft?****Why?**  The F-15 Eagle! If you have to ask why, then you wouldn’t understand.****

**What type of music do you most enjoy?** Seeing that I have three girls, I don’t have much of a choice when it comes to music. I am stuck with listening to teenage pop music.****
No. D-2541.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of Richard Brian Simring.

562 U.S. 1000, 131 S. Ct. 556,

178 L. Ed. 2d 411,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8337.

November 1, 2010.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 562 U.S. 814, 131 S. Ct. 405, 178 L. Ed. 2d 270, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7621.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2651 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2651

 To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to clarify the availability 
 and appropriateness of training for local food service personnel, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2019

   Mr. Pocan (for himself, Mr. Katko, Mr. Levin of Michigan, and Ms. 
  Stefanik) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to clarify the availability 
 and appropriateness of training for local food service personnel, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Training for School Food 
Service Workers Act''.

SEC. 2. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING.

    Section 7(g)(2)(B) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 
1776(g)(2)(B)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iv) Availability and appropriateness of 
                        training.--A training program carried out under 
                        this subparagraph shall be--
                                    ``(I) a program scheduled primarily 
                                during regular, paid working hours, and 
                                in the event such program is scheduled 
                                outside of such working hours--
                                            ``(aa) efforts shall be 
                                        made to inform food service 
                                        personnel of the necessity of 
                                        such program to be so 
                                        scheduled;
                                            ``(bb) compensation shall 
                                        be provided to such personnel 
                                        for attending such program; and
                                            ``(cc) such personnel shall 
                                        not be penalized for not being 
                                        able to attend such program; 
                                        and
                                    ``(II) offered in-person whenever 
                                appropriate, and incorporate hands-on 
                                training techniques.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Profiles in Resiliency: Command Sgt. Maj. Charles Tobin

/ Published Oct. 26, 2016

Army Command Sgt. Maj. Charles Tobin, the Defense Logistics Agency senior enlisted leader, had to deal with the deaths of several fellow soldiers after he returned home from deployment. Initially, he relied on alcohol to assuage the pain of the hardships he faced, but he soon learned what it meant to be truly resilient.

View the video in which Tobin shares how he dealt with this challenge. 

This is the latest in the “Profiles in Resiliency” video series, which seeks to inspire the DLA workforce with the testimony of colleagues who overcame serious personal difficulties.

Resiliency is one of DLA's five core values: Integrity, Resiliency and Diversity, Innovation, Accountability and Excellence. Resiliency is the foundation for agency leaders’ actions in support of their customers and employees. It provides employees flexibility to adapt to changing environments while achieving outstanding results.
No. 10-6267.

#### Connie Marshall, Petitioner v. Jerry Bowles, et al.

562 U.S. 1031, 131 S. Ct. 569,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8681.

178 L. Ed. 2d 417,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 10-177.

#### Lisa Miller, Petitioner v. Janet Jenkins.

562 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 568,

178 L. Ed. 2d 414,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8752.

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
# Procurement assistance centers help small-business owners, government buyers

/ Published Dec. 31, 2015
Fort Belvoir, Virginia,  http://www.dla.mil/HQ/SmallBusiness/PTAP.aspx.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas R. Jeffery, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 675]

Appeal from a judgment of Wayne County Court (Nesbitt, J.), entered March 26, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated as a felony.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of driving while intoxicated as a felony (Vehicle and Traffic *1272Law § 1192 [2]; § 1193 [1] [c] [ii]). We conclude that County Court properly denied his motion seeking suppression of evidence arising from the stop of his motor vehicle. The police stopped the vehicle based upon a report received by the 911 calling center indicating that a “drunk driver” named “Jeffery” was about to leave in a specifically described motor vehicle parked at a specific location. The police responded to that location within minutes, observed the described parked motor vehicle and pulled the vehicle over as it was being driven away from that location. The police acted on the basis of the report alone and did not observe any actions indicative of criminal behavior prior to the stop.

Even assuming, arguendo, that the 911 caller was anonymous *(cf. People v Dixon,*289 AD2d 937 [2001], *lv denied*98 NY2d 637 [2002]), we nevertheless conclude that the report was sufficiently corroborated to provide reasonable suspicion for the stop. We reject defendant’s contention that corroboration of the report was required with respect to “its assertion of illegality” *(Florida v J.L.,*529 US 266, 272 [2000]). *J.L.*concerned the forcible detention of a person suspected of engaging in concealed criminal activity based on a tip from an anonymous source who did not indicate the basis of his knowledge. Here, the report of the 911 caller was based on the contemporaneous observation of conduct that was not concealed *(cf. People v Braun,*299 AD2d 246 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 612 [2003]). The report contained details “so specific and congruous with that which was actually encountered that the reliability of the information could reasonably be assumed” *(People v Olsen,*93 AD2d 824, 824 [1983]), and thus we conclude that the police possessed the requisite reasonable suspicion to stop defendant’s motor vehicle *(see People v Legette,*244 AD2d 505, 507 [1997], *lv denied*92 NY2d 950 [1998]; *People v Maye,*206 AD2d 755, 757 [1994], *lv denied*84 NY2d 1035 [1995]; *see also People v Benjamin,*51 NY2d 267, 270 [1980]; *cf. People v Ballard,*279 AD2d 529 [2001]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the “Company”) herebycertifies to my knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or“filed” for any purpose whatsoever.           Date: August 16, 2004 Name: /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton          Sheldon C. Fenton       Title: Chief Executive Officer    
30
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 27, 2021

b0419

Order 

Clerk

April 27, 2021

161814 (29)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161814

COA: 352296

Wayne CC: 07-012810-FC

RAYMOND PNIEWSKI, JR., Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 2, 2021 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration 

of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
No. 10-5916.

#### Edward Dane Jeffus, Petitioner v. D. B. Drew, Warden.

562 U.S. 969, 131 S. Ct. 474,

178 L. Ed. 2d 301,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8051.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 963.