alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Distribution commander delivers Space Force birthday message

/ Published Dec. 20, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Today marks the 4th birthday of the United States Space Force. Our newest service branch’s mission is to secure our Nation’s interests in, from, and to space.

The U.S. Space Force was established December 20, 2019, with the signing of the National Defense Authorization Act, creating the first new military force since 1947, making it the sixth branch of the Armed Forces. Its creation resulted from the widespread recognition that space is a national security imperative. Organized within the Department of the Air Force, the USSF functions at an equal level as the U.S. Air Force, similar to how the Marine Corps is structured within the Department of the Navy.  

Although the USSF is the newest military service, the Defense Department has been involved in space since the early days of space exploration. Coupled with the growing threat from strategic competitors in space, it was clear there was a need for a military service focused solely on the pursuit of superiority in space.

USSF integrates satellite procurement, budgets, and personnel from more than 60 different organizations to integrate efficient and effective space operations services.  Maintaining Space Superiority is an emerging capability needed and required to protect U.S. space assets from any attack. Access and freedom to operate in space is fundamental to national security and economic prosperity. 

Still, potential adversaries are seeking ways to deny the United States access to space capabilities that are essential to both warfare and our way of life. These adversaries deploy a variety of threats on Earth and in orbit that continue to grow in size, scope, and complexity. The military and civilian Space Force Guardians work to protect and defend our Nation's interest in space to ensure that our forces, allies, and people can harness space whenever and wherever needed.  

Mr. Knight and I would like to thank each and every one of you for your continued dedicated support.  Our Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, Airmen and Guardians would not be able to perform their critical missions without our incredible DLA Distribution workforce. 

Please join us in recognizing the achievements and accomplishments of the US Space Force and its Guardians on its 4th year in service.  

Happy Birthday Space Force – Semper Supra!

V/R,

G. D. CHASERADM, SC, USN Commander
No. 10-7238.

#### Martin Ruiz Singh, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1076, 131 S. Ct. 679,

178 L. Ed. 2d 505,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9098.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 671.
# DLA Land & Maritime commander retires 

/ Published April 22, 2016

DLA Director U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch announced the retirement of Rear Adm. John King from DLA Land and Maritime, effective April 21, 2016. King served as the Commander of DLA Land and Maritime since August 2014.

King, a 1984 graduate of the United States Naval Academy, retires from the Navy after successfully serving for more than 30 years. As the commander of DLA Land and Maritime he over saw the end-to-end integration of DLA’s Land and Maritime supply chains delivering repair parts to all military services.

“John was a great asset to DLA during his tenure,” said Busch.  "He helped focus his team on DLA’s strategic efforts in serving the Warfighter and maintained a world class organization that supports our forces around the world every day.”

A Massachusetts native, King completed multiple sea tours that include the USS Nimitz, USS Pensacola and USS Harry S. Truman. His other assignments include deputy commander - Aviation, Naval Inventory Control Point, and commander Defense Distribution Depot, Susquehanna, Pennsylvania. He holds degrees in business management from the Naval Academy and a Master’s in Acquisition Management from the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, and is also a graduate of the Executive Training Program of the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College.

Upon King’s retirement DLA Land and Maritime Deputy Director James McClaugherty assumes the role of acting director until Rear Adm. Michelle Skubic reports for duty later this summer.

“We wish John fair winds and following seas as he retires and transitions into the next phase of his life,” Busch added in a note to the agency.
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004-2595 ■ p202 624-2500 ■ 1`202 628-5116 

crowellrOmoring 

Steven J. Seiden 

(202)624-2609 

sseiden@crowell.com 

November 18, 2014 

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Room W86-316 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Polling Results for Application of United Airlines, Inc. 

for a Frequency Allocation (Docket DOT-OST-2014-0196) 

Dear Mr. Gretch: 

We have polled and received non-objections from each of the carriers on the attached 

service list for the above-referenced United lapplication. Prompt approval is requested so that 

United can secure foreign authority, make final operating plans and begin marketing these 

additional San Francisco-Shanghai flights well in advance of operations, which it plans to 

commence on or about May 6, 2015, provided all necessary approvals have been secured. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Steven J. Seiden 

Counsel for 

United Airlines, Inc. 

cc: Robert Finamore 

Brian Hedberg 

Brett Kruger 

All Parties on the attached Service List 

Common names are used for airlines. 

Crowell & Moring LLP ■ www.crowell.com ■ Washington, DC ■ New York ■ San Franci;co ■ Los Angeles ■ Orange County ■ Anchorage ■ London ■ Brussels 
SERVICE LIST 

msinick _ ssd.com 

robert. wirickg aa. com 

howard.kassgaa. com 

robert.cohn(khoganlovells.com 

patrick.rizzi(a),ho ganlovells. com 

pmurphy(k ggh-airlaw. com 

kevin.montgomerygpolaraircar o. g com 

rpommergatlasair. com 

sllunsfordg fedex. com 

nssparksgfedex.com 

gbleopardg fedex. com 

jhi,coole .c~om_ 

perkmann(kcoole .~ 

sascha.vanderbellengdelta. com 

sametta. c. barnettg delta. com 

chris.walkerAdelta. com 

bob.kneisleygwnco.com 

leslie.abbottkwnco.com 

dkirsteinkyklaw. com 

jyoungAyklaw.com 

anita. mo snerg hklaw. com 

j ennifer.nowakkhklaw.com 

dwight.moore@transcom.mil 

j ohn. s. duncan(? faa. gov 

engletsgstate. o~v 

Crowell ft Moring LLP ■ www.crowell.com ■ Washington, DC ■ New York ■ San Francisco ■ Los Angeles ■ Orange County ■ Anchorage ■ London ■ Brussels
SERVED JUNE 4. 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "^^J nj. J•^r••^^r^rln^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ' ''' ;; .•: " '^' 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0007 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0533 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009SW700276) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10SW0007 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Courtney E. Felts, Respondent's Counsel 

Staff Attorney, Federal Express, Inc. 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3'" Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125-8800 

TEL: 901-434-8632 

FAX: 901-434-8283 

Ellyn Ponton, Complainant's Counsel 

Agency Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7G5 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Boulevard 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-4298 

TEL: 817-222-5089 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
# C_2014421EN.01003901.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/39

---

Judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) of 10 October 2014 — EMA v BU

(Case T-444/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - Temporary staff - Fixed-term contract - Non-renewal decision - Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal - Article 8, first subparagraph of the CEOS - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff))

2014/C 421/53

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: T. Jabłoński and N. Rampal Olmedo, acting as Agents, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and A Duron, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: BU (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third chamber) of 26 June 2013, BU v EMA (F-135/11, F-51/12 and F-110/12, ECR SC, EU:F:2013:93) and seeking to have that judgment set aside.

BU v EMA

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by BU in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by BU in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.

1

---
NUMBER 13-20-00290-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

EX PARTE S.H.

On appeal from the 54th District Court

of McLennan County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before us on State’s motion to dismiss the appeal based on 

mootness, as appellant has pled to the underlying case and is no longer held on pre-trial 

bail which is the basis for this appeal.

This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further 

delay and to preserve the parties' rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(1). Accordingly, the 

motion to dismiss is CARRIED with the case, and this appeal is ABATED and the cause 

REMANDED to the trial court. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means 
2

necessary to make appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: 

(1) whether appellant can be located; (2) whether appellant has abandoned his appeal; 

and (3) if any other orders are necessary to ensure the proper and timely pursuit of 

appellant’s appeal. 

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of 

any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental 

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days from 

the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

22nd day of April, 2021.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16687]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 20, 1998
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Premier Financial Corp., Dubuque, Iowa; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Premier Bank, 
Dubuque, Iowa.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, Manager 
of Analytical Support, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, 
San Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. First National Bank of Nevada Holding Company, Laughlin, Nevada; 
to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting 
shares of Laughlin National Bank, Laughlin, Nevada.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 18, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-16687 Filed 6-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EX 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of North American Gaming and Entertainment
Corporation (the "Company") on Form  10-K  for  the  period ending December 31,
2008 has filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I,  Chen  Weidong,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  President  and
Director  of  the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition  and  result  of  operations  of the
Company.


Name & Title					Date

/s/  Chen Weidong
-----------------
Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer), President, and Director	April 15, 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0464

IN THE MATTER OF:

R.L.R.G.,

A YOUTH IN NEED OF CARE.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Robin Lee is 

granted an extension of time to and including November 17, 2023, 

within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on 

appeal. 

No further extensions will be granted.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 16 2023

10/16/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0464
No. 10-6939.

#### Douglas Gene Mayberry, Petitioner v. Linda Sanders, Warden.

562 U.S. 1039, 131 S. Ct. 613,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8901.

178 L. Ed. 2d 431,

November 15, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
# Commentary: My first week with DLA

/ Published Oct. 27, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

**Shawn J. Jones began working as  public affairs specialist with DLA Troop Support last week.*

As the new guy, I get all the new-guy questions. But one really stopped me in my tracks.

“How was your first week with DLA?”

Now hold on a second. 

My first week *with***DLA?

I know it was meant as a polite, small-talk question. And I provided a polite, small-talk response. But the truth of the matter is that I’ve been *with***DLA for longer than a week. 

Much longer.

When an assembly line of syringe-wielding medical technicians turned my shoulder into a pin cushion during basic training at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, I was *with* DLA Troop Support’s Medical supply chain.

When I stripped out a fastener while performing maintenance on an F-16 Fighting Falcon at Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, and my team had just the spare part we needed to repair the jet without delay, I was *with***DLA Troop Support’s Industrial Hardware supply chain.

When I helped build defensive fortifications and perimeters using razor wire, sand-filled barriers and what felt like seven million sand bags during a training exercise at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, I was *with***DLA Troop Support’s Construction and Equipment supply chain.

When I filled my belly with a cold drink and a warm meal in far-flung locales like Iraq, Kuwait, Kenya, Djibouti and Qatar, I was *with***DLA Troop Support’s Subsistence supply chain.

And when I dressed for duty before meeting the Vice President, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, I was *with***DLA Troop Support’s Clothing and Textiles supply chain.

I’ve been *with* DLA on duty, I’ve been *with***DLA off duty and I’ve been *with*DLA as I slept. I’ve been with DLA as an active-duty airman and a Reserve airman. I’ve been *with***DLA in 17 different states, and I’ve been *with***DLA in 11 different countries.

So how was my first week with DLA? 

It went well, but the details are a little fuzzy. After all, it was almost two decades ago.

**Jones spent more than nine years in the active duty Air Force before becoming a Reservist in 2009. He currently serves as a career advisor with 514th Operations Group at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey.*
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0744

_____________________________

SALILA JOSEPH,

Appellant,

v.

COURTYARD BY MARRIOT/MEMIC

INDEMNITY COMPANY,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Carol J. Stephenson, Judge.

Date of Accident: February 27, 2018. 

September 19, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and LEWIS and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Divya Khullar of Khullar, P.A., Tamarac, for Appellant.

Brian A. Dominguez and Scott A. Cole of Cole, Scott & Kissane, 

P.A., Miami, for Appellees.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17133]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33585]


RailTex, Inc.--Control Exemption--Central Properties, Inc., The 
Central Railroad Company of Indianapolis, and The Central Railroad 
Company of Indiana

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board exempts from the prior 
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323-25 the acquisition of control 
by RailTex, Inc., of The Central Railroad Company of Indianapolis and 
The Central Railroad Company of Indiana, Class III rail carriers, 
through the purchase of all of the stock of their noncarrier parent 
holding company, Central Properties, Inc.

DATES: The exemption will be effective July 26, 1998. Petitions to stay 
must be filed by July 13, 1998, and petitions to reopen must be filed 
by July 21, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send an original and 10 copies of all pleadings referring to 
STB Finance Docket No. 33585 to: Surface Transportation Board, Office 
of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 
20423-0001. In addition, send one copy of pleadings to petitioner's 
representative: Karl Morell, Ball Janik LLP, Suite 225, 1455 F Street, 
NW, Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar (202) 565-1600. [TDD 
for the hearing impaired (202) 565-1695.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC News & Data, Inc., 1925 K Street, 
NW, Suite 210, Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 289-4357. 
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services 
(202) 565-1695.] Board decisions and notices are available on our 
website at WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.

    Decided: June 22, 1998.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-17133 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

h1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147625 & (26)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147625

COA: 310740

Berrien CC: 92-003857-FC

TRACY ALEXANDER MARTIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2013 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The amended 

motion to remand is DENIED.
No. 10-259.

#### Torina A. Collis, Petitioner v. Bank of America, N.A.

562 U.S. 963, 131 S. Ct. 478,

178 L. Ed. 2d 291,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7956.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 819.