alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Puget Sound’s Taasaas named Employee of the Quarter

/ Published Aug. 28, 2015
PUGET SOUND, Washington, 
Doug Taasaas, inventory management specialist at DLA Distribution Puget Sound, Wash., has been named Employee of the Quarter for the third quarter of fiscal year 2015.   

According to Distribution Puget Sound’s commander, Navy Cmdr. Mark Peace, Taasaas has made an exceptional impact on the inventory integrity and management of Navy Working Capital Fund material, contributing significantly to overall warfighter readiness.  

Considered as the Inventory Accuracy Team technical expert, in 2014 Taasaas validated six location audits and spot inventories on over 6,250 line items valued in excess of $5.5 million with an average inventory accuracy rate of 99 percent.  He also managed the daily operations and 17 schedule inventories for the organization’s Bangor site, which resulted in a 100 percent completion rate and was completed ahead of schedule.   

Taasaas used his extensive knowledge of the Enterprise Resource Planning system, the Navy’s financial system of record, and volunteered to facilitate and teach Physical Inventory Management Instructor-Led Training modules to more than 25 Distribution Puget Sound and Fleet Logistics Center Puget Sound employees.  The result expedited employee ERP access by more than 30 days.   

Peace says Taasaas is a “process improvement advocate” and implemented best business practices by creating a bar code that identifies unit of issues, plant type and categories for issuable materiel not recognized by the ERP scanner.  “Mr. Taasaas reduced the inventory physical count process by 25 percent.  Additionally, he developed three ERP Standard Operating Procedures that streamlined inventory processes and improved inventory efficiency rate by 98 percent,” said Peace.

When not at work, Taasaas is an active community servant.  He volunteered over 60 hours as financial custodian, secretary, and supply clerk for Christ the King Lutheran Church and School in Bremerton, Wash.  He collected and deposited all monies donated to the church, tracked online contributions, prepared financial statements, and managed the congregation’s consumable supply requirements that saved the church approximately $35,000 per year in salaries.

“Mr. Taasaas is a dedicated, loyal and dependable employee with a phenomenal work ethic.  He takes ownership, accountability and pride in everything he does.  His unselfish devotion to duty is exemplary and infectious among other employees,” said Peace.
----

Exhibit 99.11

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,     As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

          In connection with theQuarterly Report of Loudeye Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q forthe period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerold J. Goade, Jr., Chief FinancialOfficer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. �, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

          2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Jerold J. Goade,Jr.           

 

Jerold J. Goade, Jr.Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of FinanceController, and Principal Accounting OfficerNovember 12, 2002

 

----
# DLA leader goes to school with eye on the future

/ Published May 21, 2024
FORT BELVOIR, Va., Fort Belvoir, Va.
Defense Logistics Agency’s Chief Information Officer is spearheading the effort to recruit talent to the agency by bridging the gap between the Department of Defense and higher institutions.

As part of DoD’s Taking the Pentagon to the People initiative, Adarryl Roberts is engaged in an educational outreach program that enlightens students on employment, internships, scholarships and the vast opportunities within DLA and Information Operations.

Roberts and James Johnson, DLA’s program executive officer, paid a visit to Hampton University and former DLA Director Lt. Gen. Darrell K. Williams on May 6. Williams is the current president at Hampton. After a tour of the historic campus, the leaders signed a partnership agreement between DLA/J6 and the school. This memorandum of understanding provides access to the bright and talented young students at Hampton University who express the desire to serve the Warfighter and become a DLA teammate. 

Williams stated he was proud to say as the former DLA director that the DLA employees are the "secret sauce” and he now includes his students at the school as part of that secret sauce needed to carry on this proud tradition.

In addition to Hampton, Roberts has signed agreements with Tuskegee Univ.; Alabama State Univ.; Claflin Univ.; Arizona State Univ.; and New Mexico State Univ..  He is working with the Univ. of California-Riverside in establishing a pilot program to educate, motivate and encourage the students to consider DLA/J6 and the federal government as a career opportunity.

DoD’s Taking the Pentagon to the People initiative is carried out through the DoD’s Office for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (ODEI) and provides:
      - Information about student opportunities for employment, internships, and scholarships.
      - Information on DoD’s current & future opportunities in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, business, education, language, arts, and many other fields.
      - A pathway to connect students and graduates directly to DoD Senior leaders, executives, and recruiters.
      - Information for faculty and staff on research, fellowships, sabbaticals, contract, and grants.
# Aviation customer service captain named DLA’s 2nd quarter CGO 

/ Published July 27, 2016
Richmond, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency’s Company Grade Officer of the Quarter for the 2nd quarter fiscal 2016, is DLA Aviation’s own Air Force Capt. Broderick Morris, who is the B-2 weapons system program manager currently assigned to the Air Force Customer Facing Division in the Customer Operations Directorate.

 Morris was nominated and selected for his performance while deployed as a member of the DLA Support Team –Kuwait from January to March 2016. 

He served as the operations officer supporting Operations Inherent Resolve and Spartan Shield where he performed superbly highlighting his professional skills, knowledge and leadership said, Air Force Col. Fredrick Plaumann, Customer Operations director. During the second quarter, Morris pushed high-priority orders, streamlined processes, expedited contracting actions leading to a reduction in wait-times in excess of a year and initiated proof of principle movements in a supply network introducing three new routes. 

“Capt. Morris’ knowledge of various supply chain management principles enabled him to provide exceptional multi-class support which resulted in the establishment and sustainment of multiple forward-operating bases in Iraq, an increase in utilization of the Trans-Arabian Network, and the development of multiple mission partners in Iraq and Syria,” said DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Allan Day. “As an Air Force Officer assigned to DLA Aviation, Capt. Morris is committed to providing top-notch warfighter support to our DLA customers.”
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3786-3787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Public Debt


Proposed Collection: Comment Request

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury, as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently the Bureau of the Public Debt within the 
Department of the Treasury is soliciting comments concerning the U.S. 
Savings Bonds EasySaver Plan Enrollment Application Series EE.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 30, 1998, 
to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Bureau of the Public Debt, 
Vicki S. Thorpe, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the form and instructions should be directed to Vicki S. 
Thorpe, Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg, WV 
26106-1328, (304) 480-6553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: U.S. Savings Bonds EasySaver Plan Enrollment Application 
Series EE.
    Form Number: PD F 5391.
    Abstract: The information is requested from the purchaser to issue 
Series EE Savings Bonds.
    Current Actions: None.
    Type of Review: New.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 100,000.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 10 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 17,000.


[[Page 3787]]


REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Comments submitted in response to this notice 
will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All 
comments will become a matter of public record. Comments are invited 
on: (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether 
the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (c) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) 
estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, 
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.

    Dated: January 20, 1998.
Vicki S. Thorpe,
Manager, Graphics, Printing and Records Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-1729 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
No. 10-513.

#### Charles Blunt, Petitioner v. North Dakota.

562 U.S. 1065, 131 S. Ct. 668,

178 L. Ed. 2d 484,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9173.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Dakota denied.

Same case below, 785 N.W.2d 909.
I 

### Reg u l atory Eva l u a ti o n Docket No. FAA- 

### . . 20!5""-AJIII- ObO - 

## ® Dire c t ora te Id e ntifi er: -AD (f'.mu 

### make

**clumge~** Lo 

### tlte 

### nducs i11 the table bel01r. yoummlell . \1/re the lo la/ . \ 11pdute acc;ordi11gly. 

### (I' the • · t!o IIOt , c:lick 

### (o r Tuh) i11to 

### u11d l he11 oul of the du111ged cl'/1 . Esti m ate d Costs: Action Costs per Pr o duct (e . g ., aircraft, engine, (e.g. , In spec tion , propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labo r Parts C ost Tota l Cos ts Numbe r of Total Cost replacement) ( include cost ( labor + 

# u. s . f or U . S . Fleet Do n o t in c lud e oncond ition costs h e re access , test in g, (@$85 / h pa r t s) Reg is t e r e d and close- up) OUI } Product s Mod i fy 

### th e cockp it 9.0 $2 ,430 

## 70 I I door 

### frame (I •II



### ~nA **'f'x** u 

## IP" or- ' (It ljj lo 'lfl



### ,...l ..J ,4 

### r J0 1 [.,_((_ Ill I) 

# .,,

**cc?~--** Ito ') I fJ IIi t (I' cU't t:.V'\e"\ \ 

## J

**~~** Ill 

## f1

_ 0 . W • II()

**~~ a**  

### n .n l 

### ' 'I •( I {1. I (I HI 

# '" I i (J HI 

## ,, I I ' II oil II 1f 

# .,,,, f I II tl\ I II II I 'I I ''' !;,II ( II 1l' 0 0! I) fill 

### n ,q ll•H 

## ,, ( 

### n 11 ) 1(1 I 

# ,, I ''II .., () '111 I (II)

**~** I) ,,() ' I) Ill! I liP 

## n 111 The known numb e r of products in compl iance : 

## 0 Total Cos t s of compliance for U . S. fleet: $223 , 650 Co s ts cove red und er warranty 

### (if/mown) 

## $0 O n -Co n d i tion Cos t s: Action Work-hours Labor co s t Part s C ost Cost per Produ ct (e . g . , In s pec ti o n , ( include acces s, (@ $85 /hour) te s ting , and close - re plac e me nt ) up) I '' I 1 \ 

# ,,,., ' 

# .. , I 1 

### S p ecial co n s ide t ·ations fo r Eco n o mi c A n a lys i s ( Us e this fi e ld to exp lain anythin g in the Estimated Cosls tabl e that was ass11m e d o r mi g ht not be obv io us. This fi e ld can also be us e d to e xp la in warranty cost:, ) :

### Exec utiv e Order 12866: Co uld th e /\D b e c o n s id e re d a " s ignificant re g ul a tory ac ti o n ' ' ? 

# G YES*0

**NO~** 

### *Ex pl a n a ti o n: 

### DOT . Re g ulato ry Policies and Procedures: I s the AD s ignificant? -- YES*0

**NO~** 

### * Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: W ill th e AD hav e 

### a s ignificant economic impa ct on a substa nti a l numb e r of s mall enti ties? Expla in for e ith e r a Y es or No



# wer. **'** YESO

**NO~** 

### Expl a nat io n : 

### Intrastate Aviation in A la s ka: Thi s A D co ul d aff ect intra s tate av iation in A la s ka . Is 

### it appropriate to in cl ud e s p ec ifi c r e quir e ments f o r a irc ra ft o p e ra ted in A las ka wh e re a v ia t ion mi g ht b e th e o nl y mo d e of t ra n s p o rtat i o n ?



# ~ YES* 

# D

**NO~** 

### *Ex pl a nati o n:
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1621]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List services to be 
furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have 
other severe disabilities.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 23, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Gateway 3, Suite 310, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-4302.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 3 and November 28, 1997, the 
Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled 
published notices (62 FR 51827 and 63314) of proposed additions to the 
Procurement List.
    After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the services and 
impact of the additions on the current or most recent contractors, the 
Committee has determined that the services listed below are suitable 
for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 46-48c and 41 
CFR 51-2.4. I certify that the following action will not have a 
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major 
factors considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the services to the 
Government.
    2. The action will not have a severe economic impact on current 
contractors for the services.
    3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the services to the Government.
    4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the services proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.
    Accordingly, the following services are hereby added to the 
Procurement List:

Grounds/Garage Maintenance

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1601 Perdido Street, New Orleans, 
Louisiana

Janitorial/Custodial

Naval Command Control & Ocean Surveillance Center, East Coast Division 
Complex (trailers/laboratories), Charleston, South Carolina
Operation of Postal Service Center, Luke Air Force Base, Arizona.

    This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
effective date of this addition or options that may be exercised under 
those contracts.
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-1621 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
No. D-2538.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Stephen Leonard Ziegler.

562 U.S. 814, 131 S. Ct. 405,

178 L. Ed. 2d 269,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7597.

October 4, 2010.

Stephen Leonard Ziegler, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
# C_2015127EN.01002402.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 March 2015 — Three-N-Products v OHIM — Munindra (PRANAYUR)

(Case T-543/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PRANAYUR - Earlier Community word mark AYUR and earlier Community figurative marks Ayur, Ayur Naturals Herbals and Aanb - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 127/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Three-N-Products Private Ltd (New Delhi, India) (represented by: N. Colombo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Munindra Holding BV (Lelystad, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 July 2013 (Case R 638/2012-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Three-N-Products Private Ltd and Munindra Holding BV.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Three-N-Products Private Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Three-N-Products Private Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.

1

---
No. 10-6820.

#### Jose Antonio Barrios, Petitioner v. George J. Giurbino, Warden.

562 U.S. 1093, 131 S. Ct. 800,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9458.

178 L. Ed. 2d 535,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 852.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer  Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)  of the Exchange Act

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Krakoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

|By: |  | /s/ROBERT L. KRAKOFFRobert L. Krakoff
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|    |  | Date: August 14, 2003                                         |  | 

---

QuickLinks
No. 10-7129.

#### Zachary Ballard, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1085, 131 S. Ct. 673,

178 L. Ed. 2d 516,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9302.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 6.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 19, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20325 Conference Calendar

THOMAS LOVE PAIGE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHARLES BACARISSE; GEORGE H. GODWIN, Judge; TROY C. BENNETT, JR.; SHARON KELLER, Presiding Judge, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-03-CV-316

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Thomas Love Paige, Texas prisoner # 788890, appeals from the dismissal of his civil action as frivolous and for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The district court also dismissed any habeas corpus claim, to the extent that Paige raised such a claim. Paige’s district-court action arose from his state habeas corpus proceedings. Paige failed to sign his first state habeasNo. 03-20325 -2- corpus application, which led to the dismissal of that application for lack of jurisdiction. He requested an injunction directing the defendants to set aside the denial of his second state habeas application, hold a hearing on the merits of his first application, and grant him an out-of-time appeal. Paige contends that the district court erred by dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim as frivolous. He argues that the defendants violated his federal constitutional rights by failing to notify him of the defects in his state-court habeas pleadings, thus creating a jurisdictional defect. He argues that the district court erred by converting his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action into a habeas action because his claims were not cognizable in habeas. We do not construe Paige’s complaint as raising any habeas corpus claims. See Preiser v. Rodriguez , 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). Rather, we construe the action as one seeking mandamus relief, relief the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant. See Santee v. Quinlan , 115 F.3d 355, 356 (5th Cir. 1997); Moye v. Clerk, DeKalb County Superior Court , 474 F.2d 1275, 1275-76 (5th Cir. 1973). Because the action underlying Paige’s district-court action was a state habeas proceeding, the dismissal of the complaint and the affirmance on appeal do not count as strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Cf. In re Jacobs , 213 F.3d 289, 290-91 (5th Cir. 2000).
AFFIRMED.