alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Report)
of SunCom Wireless, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof, I, David D. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as appropriate, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ David D. ClarkName:

David D. ClarkTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

May 13, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to SunCom Wireless, Inc. and will be retained by SunCom Wireless, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of SunCom Wireless, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or
after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
# C_2014421EN.01003902.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Larrañaga Otaño v OHIM (GRAPHENE)

(Case T-458/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark GRAPHENE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 421/54

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Joseba Larrañaga Otaño (San Sebastián, Spain) and Mikel Larrañaga Otaño (San Sebastián) (represented by: F. Bueno Salamero, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 June 2013 (Case R 208/2013-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign GRAPHENE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Joseba Larrañaga Otaño and Mikel Larrañaga Otaño to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Joseba Larrañaga Otaño and Mikel Larrañaga Otaño to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PCS Research
Technology, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: May 17, 2004                        By: /s/ BRIAN M. OVERSTREET
                                               ---------------------------------
                                           Name:  Brian M. Overstreet
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Principal Accounting Officer

                                       26
Better Buying Power in practice
 
  By COLUMBUS, Ohio
  Better Buying Power 3.0 DLA Land and Maritime                   **Editor’s note:** This is part of a series of articles that DLA will highlight on BBP 3.0 called "Better Buying Power in Focus."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BANC CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          33,557
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,486
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,155
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     65,050
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,445
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,382
<LOANS>                                        666,476
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 848,362
<DEPOSITS>                                     681,817
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,333
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,739
<LONG-TERM>                                     77,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 848,362
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,201
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,246
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   202
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,649
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,256
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,284
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,365
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      888
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,273
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,273
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       902
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.51
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,002
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,257
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,065
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      330
<RECOVERIES>                                       111
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,734
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,734
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 09-11277.

#### Wayne B. Gaedtke, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 981, 131 S. Ct. 413,

178 L. Ed. 2d 322,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8142.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 12.
No. 10-415.

#### Anne Bryant, et al., Petitioners v. Media Right Productions, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1064, 131 S. Ct. 656,

178 L. Ed. 2d 482,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9235.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 603 F.3d 135.
No. 10-5847.

#### Richard Rowell, Petitioner v. Ruben A. Martino, et al.

562 U.S. 1088, 131 S. Ct. 697,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9034.

178 L. Ed. 2d 527,

November 29, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 968, 131 S. Ct. 471, 178 L. Ed. 2d 300, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 8091.
No. 10-7063.

#### Ruben Sanavia-Arellano, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1073, 131 S. Ct. 670,

178 L. Ed. 2d 499,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9285.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 770.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15797]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:01 a.m. on 
Tuesday, June 9, 1998, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider (1) matters 
relating to the Corporation's supervisory activities, (2) reports of 
the Office of Inspector General, and (3) personnel matters.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director Joseph H. Neely 
(Appointive), concurred in by Mr. Richard M. Riccobono, acting in the 
place and stead of Director Ellen S. Seidman (Director, Office of 
Thrift Supervision), Director Julie L. Williams (Acting Comptroller of 
the Currency), and Chairman Donna A. Tanoue, that Corporation business 
required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' 
notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was 
practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of 
the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the 
matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of 
subsections (c)(2), (c)(40), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and 
(c)(9)(B) of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(2), (c)(4)), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550-17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Dated: June 9, 1998.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James D. LaPierre,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15797 Filed 6-9-98; 4:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
**EXHIBIT23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-110674, 333-91013, 333-85257, 333-46255, and 333-139012), and Registration Statements on FormS-8 (Nos. 333-123284, 333-102654, and 333-91867) of our report dated March 13, 2007, relating tothe consolidated financial statements of Double Eagle Petroleum Co. and to the effectiveness ofthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting which appears in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of Double Eagle Petroleum Co. for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLPDenver, Colorado****
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
William R. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of hi/fn, inc. on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of hi/fn, inc.

|Date: February 9 , 2005 |  | By: /s/ William R. Walker
Name:  William R. WalkerTitle:  Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Educator, therapist explains hidden disabilities

/ Published Oct. 21, 2016
#### Jhonny Gutierrez, Respondent, v Harco Consultants Corp. et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[67 NYS3d 624]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered February 9, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, and denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the section 240 (1) claim, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny plaintiff’s motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

According to plaintiff’s testimony in this action, he was exposed to elevation-related hazards *(see Wilinski v 334 E. 92nd Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.,*18 NY3d 1, 9 [2011]). Assuming that the piece of rebar that allegedly struck plaintiff weighed what defendants claimed it weighed, it still presented an elevation-related risk even if it may have traveled only a short distance before striking plaintiff *(see Marrero v 2075 Holding Co. LLC,*106 AD3d 408, 409 [1st Dept 2013]; *Cardenas v One State St., LLC,*68 AD3d 436, 437 [1st Dept 2009]). We reject defendants’ contention that the rebar being passed to plaintiff did not require a safety device of the type contemplated by Labor Law § 240 because it was being carried by hand *(see e.g. Rutkowski*
      *538
      *v New York Convention Ctr. Dev.*Corp., 146 AD3d 686 [1st Dept 2017]). However, plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment as to liability on the claim under section 240 (1) because the records of his medical treatment create an issue of fact as to whether his injury was incurred in the manner described in his testimony.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kapnick, Webber and Moulton, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-
52782 and 33-63602, and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement
Nos. 33-46773 and 33-53563-01 of Duquesne Light Company on Form S-3 of our
report dated February 1, 2001, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Duquesne Light Company for the year ended December 31, 2000.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 26, 2001
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of
Microvision, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)     the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:November 3, 2006 | By: /s/ Alexander Y. Tokman   Alexander Y. Tokman 
 Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
# Distribution’s aide-de-camp receives Defense Meritorious Service Medal

/ Published July 19, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Army Capt. Michael Thomas, aide-de-camp to the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution commander, was awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal for his skillful planning and management of the General’s day-to-day mission requirements.

Upon his arrival at DLA Distribution in July 2015, Thomas’ communication, planning, and organizational skills enabled him to independently coordinate numerous CONUS and OCONUS command visits, as well as a myriad of conferences and meetings, said chief of staff Perry Knight.

Thomas enlisted in the United States Army in July 1991, completed Basic Combat Training at Fort Leonard Wood, Miss., and Advanced Individual Training at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, where he earned the military occupational specialty of Combat Medic (91B/68W). After serving 17 years as a non-commissioned officer and achieving the rank of sergeant first class, he received his commission through Officer Candidate School, branching Quartermaster on February 10, 2011.

Thomas holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Trident University and is currently pursuing an MBA in Logistics Management through Florida Institute of Technology. His military education includes Officer Candidate School, Quartermaster Officer Basic Course, Contracting Officers Representative Course, Unit Movement Officer Course, Battle Staff, Force XXI Battle Command Brigade Course, Combatives Level I and II, Airborne School, and Sling Load Inspector’s Certification Course.

Thomas’s operational deployments include Operation Iraqi Freedom 05 as the night operations non-commissioned officer for 4th Sustainment Brigade, Operation Iraqi Freedom 08-09 as the brigade operations non-commissioned officer-in-charge 4th Sustainment Brigade, and Operation Enduring Freedom 12 as the Base Defense Operations Center officer-in-charge and Headquarters and Headquarters Battery 5th Battalion 82nd Field Artillery Regiment Executive Officer Forward Operating Base Gamberi, Afghanistan. His assignments include distribution platoon leader, executive officer, maintenance control officer 4th Brigade Combat Team 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, Texas, and executive officer for Bravo Company 244th Quartermaster Battalion.  

Thomas’s awards and decorations include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal (1 oak leaf cluster), Army Commendation Medal (6 oak leaf clusters), Army Achievement Medal (7 oak leaf clusters), Afghanistan Campaign Medal, Iraq Campaign Medal (2 campaign stars), Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, NATO Medal (1 campaign star), Meritorious Unit Citation, Korean Defense Service Medal, Overseas Service Ribbon, Expert Field Medical Badge, Drill Sergeant Identification Badge and the Parachutist Badge.
No. 10-6450.

#### In re Reginald Wilkinson, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 1059, 131 S. Ct. 648,

178 L. Ed. 2d 516,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9380.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit
10.2


 


Fargo
Electronics, Inc.


2005
Non-employee Director Compensation Summary


 


The Board of Directors of Fargo Electronics, Inc. approved the
following fee schedule to be effective January 1, 2005 for
non-employee directors:


 


	
  Annual Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  20,000

  	
   

  
	
  Lead Director

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  8,000

  	
   

  
	
  Audit Committee chair

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  7,000

  	
   

  
	
  Audit Committee members

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  3,000

  	
   

  
	
  Other Committee chairs

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  3,000

  	
   

  
	
  Other Committee members

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  



 


The Board also approved a stock option grant of 5,000 shares per
non-employee director on the date of the annual meeting.


 


All cash compensation
will be paid quarterly.
No. 10-7391.

#### Omar Sierra, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1097, 131 S. Ct. 810,

178 L. Ed. 2d 541,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9451.

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 390 Fed. Appx. 793.
#### Russell W. Rosen et al., Appellants, v Jonathan Schwartz, Respondent.

[49 NYS3d 301]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered February 29, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the complaint reinstated.

Although defendant was found not guilty by reason of mental *654disease or defect in connection with the stabbing death of his mother, the complaint stated a viable wrongful death claim against him pursuant to EPTL 5-4.1, since an insane person may be liable in tort for his actions *(see Hirsch v Mastroianni,*80 AD2d 633, 634 [2d Dept 1981]; *Albicocco v Nicoletto,*11 AD2d 690 [2d Dept 1960], *affd*9 NY2d 920 [1961]). A wrongful death claim was also stated on behalf of defendant’s brother, who committed suicide after his mother’s murder. To the extent Supreme Court decided whether defendant may inherit from his mother’s estate, no ruling on that question was sought by plaintiffs, and, in any event, the ruling was not only premature, but should be determined in the Surrogate’s Court *(see e.g. Matter of Demesyeux,*42 Misc 3d 730 [Sur Ct, Nassau County 2013]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
No. 10-6251.

#### Tony Goodrum, Petitioner v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of California, et al.

562 U.S. 1013, 131 S. Ct. 528,

178 L. Ed. 2d 389,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8499.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 750.
No. 09-1443.

#### Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Petitioner v. Johnathan Andrew Doody.

562 U.S. 956, 131 S. Ct. 456,

178 L. Ed. 2d 282,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8063.

October 12, 2010.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Florida v. Powell, 559 U.S. 50, 130 S. Ct. 1195, 175 L. Ed. 2d 1009 (2010).

Same case below, 596 F.3d 620.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2395

To designate the United States Federal Building and Courthouse in Detroit,

Michigan, as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Federal Building and Courthouse’’,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 16 (legislative day, AUGUST 11), 1994

Mr. RIEGLE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To designate the United States Federal Building and Courthouse in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Federal Building and Courthouse’’, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. THEODORE LEVIN FEDERAL BUILDING AND

4 COURTHOUSE.

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The courthouse facility lo6 cated at 231 West Lafayette, in Detroit, Michigan, shall

7 be known and designated as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Federal

8 Building and Courthouse’’.
2

•S 2395 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

3 States to the courthouse facility referred to in subsection

4 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Theodore

5 Levin Federal Building and Courthouse’’.

Æ