p. 1



# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 73 ) ll-E-3 3 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/20088:42:05AM

Sheet 73 of 264» f P. 2

i f UllliTE Q STATE S ENVIRONME|NTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y

, Offic e o f Ai rQualif yP I innin g an d Standard s Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 Researc h Triangl e Ifark , 

## SDEC-5I99 T

EP A AI R DOCKE T *< V 

### nr r 1 $ iqpt;

REINFORCED PLASTI C COMPOSITE S NESHAP PRE-MAC T TEA M MEMBER S Dea r Tea

m and/o r Wor k Group Member : Th e pre-MAC T tea

m hel d a teleconferenc e on Septembe r 27 , 199 5 t o discus s issue s relate d t o the developmen t o f standard s fo r the plasti c composite s industry . Th e key topic s addressed included the determinatio n o f majo r sources , subcategorization o f th e industry , an

d potentia l format s fo r th e standards . Pleas e refe r t o th e attache d cop y o f th e meetin g minute s fo r detail s o f thes e an

d othe r topic s o f discussion (Enclosur e 1) . Severa l issue s reguir e additiona l inpu t an d informatio

n t o b e collected fro

m th e pre-MAC T team . Thes e issue s pertai n t o th e subcategorization and analysi s o f th e industry for the purpos e o f setting standards . W e nee d you r inpu t o hthes e matter s s o tha t th e developmen t o f MAC T floor s an d proposa l o f th e standard s ca n proceed . I hav e highlighte d i n Enclosur e 2 a lis t o f "cor e issues " o

n whic hinput , fro

m th e tea

m i s crucial . I n addition , pleas e b e sur e t o rea d th e "Nex t Steps " sectio n o f the meeting minute s fo r way s t o facilitat e the developmen t an d progres s o f th e rule . I n orde r fo r u s t o utiliz e thi s information i n developin

g th e rule , w e nee d t o receiv e you r inpu t b

y Novembe r 3 , 1995 . 2383 . I f you hav e an y questions , pleas e contac t me a t (919 ) 541 -

Sincerely , cerexy , A

Madelein e Stru

m Projec t Leade r Coating s an

d Consume r Product s Grou p Enclosure sP. 3

» ;



### ADDRESSEES ; , , _ Mar k Banner , RT I Moha nBalagopalan , SCAQMD "TS^OCIRIA 

### - • Jane t Beloin , Regio nI '" '" . Bo bBurmark , Washingto nDO E Jan e Caldwell , OAQPS/AQSS D (MD-15 ) Leonard o Ceron , Regio nI V Lis a Conner , OAQPS/AQSS D (MD-15 ) Patrici a Embrey , OG C (2344 ) Bo bFegley , OR D (8105 ) Chuc k French , OAQPS/AQSS D (MD-15 ) Lind a Herring , EPA/ES D (MD-13 ) Norm Kaplan , EPA/OR D (MD-61 ) Emer y Kong , RT I Kare nLevy , OPAR(6103 ) Mari a Malave , OEC A

(2223A ) Hail e Mariam , OS W

(5302W ) Crai g Matthiessen , OSWE R(5101 ) Stev e McNally , Composite s Fabricator s Assoc . Christin e McPhee , Ohi o EP A Arnol d Medbery , OSDB U(1230-C ) Richar d Nielson , Clar k County , N V Carlo s Nunez , OR D (MD-61 ) Nanc y Pate , OAQPS/ITPI D Solomo nRicks , OAQPS/EMAD (MD-19 ) Ro nRyan , OAQPS/EMAD (MD-14 ) Joh nSchweitzer , Composite s Institut e Jorda nSpooner , OPPT/PP D (7409 )



# 2P. 4



### Enclosur e 1 MEMORANDU

M

TO : Madelein

e Strum , U.S . EPA/OAQPS/ES

D FROM : Gre

g LaFlam , Pacific Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) DATE : Octobe

r12 , 1995 L:\N30 8 SUBJECT : Pre-MACT Team/EP A Workgrou

p Teleconferenc

e - Septembe

r27 , 199 5

I . Purpos

e Th e primar y purpose o f

this meetin

g wa s t o discus s an

d reac h agreemen

to n severa

l issue s regardin

g industr y subcategorization, identificatio n o f majo rsources , an

d potentia l format s o f th e NESHAPstandard

. A secon d purpos e was t o reques

tsuppor tfrom the tea

m i n obtainin

g additiona

l dat aan d reachin g a consensu

s o n decisions neede

d i n developing a regulator y proposa l fo rthe plastic composite

s sourc e category . n . Locatio

n o f Meeting an

d Participant

s Place : U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y N.C . Mutua

l Lif e Building, Roo

m 110 1 Durham , N C Date : Septembe

r27,1995 , 1:00-3:4

5 p m Participants : Mar k Banner , RT I (919 ) 541-601 6 Moha n Balagopalan

, SCAQM D (909 ) 396-270 4 Jane tBeloin , Regio

n I (617 ) 565-273 4 Jeffre y Best, PE

S (919 ) 941-033 3 Da n Boyd , consultant

* Bernar d Brie , Washingto

n DOE (206 ) 407-681 2 Leonard o Ceron, Regio

n I V (404 ) 347-355 5 Lind aChappell, OAQP

S (919 ) 541-286 4 Chri s Collins , Mohav

e Desert * Lis a Conner

, OAQPS/AQSS

D (919 ) 541-506 0 Bo b Fegley , OR

D (202 ) 260-048 4 Eric Goehl , Radia

n (919 ) 461-136 7 Nor m Kaplan , OR D (919 ) 541-255 6 Ja n King, OAQP

S (919 ) 541-566 5 Emer y Kong, RT

I (919 ) 541-596 4P. 5

M " d *'I"' ' t f '"*'*"".vf" ' 

### Madeleine * Stru

m October'12 , 199 5 Page 2

et au e not*»<»? * fc* & 

### a^jj^^ ^ o f owreouHtm^ . rathe

rto K»^Kf n 

### '^* ! 

### > 4 n 

### ^C£f t*&';, • w i 

### «*«cv.- ^ u, e M M Moo r- h* * Jv^-i o* - TMv, ,oM

C 

### M^h $te$)^Wxmta i * 'J w ^ ,K)u> . o . ^ u .,i-... u

„ uo,„ . ' u l 

### cystin e McPhee , Ohi o EP A (216 ) 963-120 5 !t 

### , v

### , A 

### .. . Arnold,Medbery , OSDB U (703 ) 305-517L , ,.,*. » ;•,„,,-•*>•••

>

.. , . , , .Richar d Nielson , Clark.County...NY (702 ) 383rl27 6 ,, > • . r^ r4 T - - - , Gedde s Ramsey , PRDX919 ) 541-7963.1,. , „.,,;„«.,,,; - " : " '

K

### ; • ';; ; .Solomo n Ricks,,.OAQPS/EMAD.(919)541-5242v, , >|0M 

### , .

. . . Alex Santos , CARB,.., , ,„..., , v- . <;"V I -N>V . 

### ...-,.,•.. . * V . 

### ' . ":".""' . Fran kSinclair , Mohave Desert, w 

### . , . ^v. < ., , : 

### tf-»

» 4l

### i L 

### "i/ 5 

### \ ~. ; Jorda n Spopner„OPPT/PPD I 

### (202 ) 2604418. „ . ^ , rwW 

### . * ; ' :;;. ' : , , •',.,. Madelein e Strum , OAQPS/ES D (919 ) 541-2383* , .-,.,, < , r 

### ,, , '^iW.' ^ •*i'>

. '<^ ' • «••*• • /:•'•> : :.a.->Mi.V - yrs-x-d. .•piW. dr''Mmv^AiM. *•*!.%} V v ',',"„;, ''•'» • ;Thesc > 

### paubcipa^;are.no tregula rmembers,o f th e tea m o rWorkgrou p no rar e they . EP X cohfractors , an d phon e number s wer e no tprovide d durin g th e meeting.','' ; 

### , . , . » . , ;dA-*rii'i/jv.iv... ' •.:'; y rrf;.): < ./'A.^ ! U?..U)> ; 

### ..^. ^ v . ^u* ; i^.^^-.®. . •.•.. • >». * * *»-.o\^J-»ij>. . .-.

. . v ^ ivAiJ"' ' '^"••

v.••!*i,;;.</.'

, 

### :fv,:". 7 *.. ,

### '.: a.an;» * .v.v;i-;'i»i"'«.*! - - ; 

### t : ^"'"'^ 5 Wir.tjB*ri e "/*•»»>'« • '":a^'vV . UI . Discussio n :>iJ. '.vlvi'r;- ••:.

: JV: < * ) 

### fcii. 0. M fis^JU:^-.'^ /

Ad i.*v>v.i!«. i *t ; i^tv--^ s ' : 

### o w?ist: #'WM-.a^ w5vrtjr;.- , 

### .«; , 

### »i:- A •«'.'• ' '*' ' t! 

### ^ Ms . Stniriiopene d th e meetin g b y askin g th e participant s t o introduc e themselves . Sh e the n state d tha tth e meetin g woul d procee d accordin g t o th e materia l i n th e briefin g packag e (meetin g agend aexpande d throug h th e additio n o f detaile d discussio n points ) whic h ha d bee n faxe d to'the^ou p just'prio rto th e meeting , an d sai d thi s packag e woul d b e : 

### " include d with^th e meetSmg minute s (se e Attachmen t1) .

- • .. ; .';. / ••''oir,. ; ; .• ...:.d:°.i:'.] .i<:.i:d



### • Ms . Stni m the n enumerate d th e principa l goal s ofth e meetin g a s liste d i n ite m 2 o f tiiebriefin g package : 1 ) agre e o n amethodolog y fo ridentifyin g majo rsourc e facilitie s i n th e data , base , 2 ) discus s subcategor y issue s an d agre e o n a n approach , 3 ) discus s possibl e * format s fo rth e standard s fo rope n moldin g processes , 4 ) discus s contro l measure s i n use , an d 5 ) requestthefsuppor to f th e tea m m acquirin g additiona l dat aan d i n reviewin g memo s ai d othe rmaterial s generate d unde rth e projec t.Ther e wa s n o respons e t o Ms.'Strum' s reques tfo rdiscussio n from th e grou p o n th e goal s o f th e meeting .

,•;. . ., . .,-•.-. ••- . •.- . • ••• •' •• . :•'•'••;• •;'!-{> r . - ; -'\:-\ ^ <

•

•-'-•. . v\- :

_ _ •,.-. . 

### Th e remainde ro f

thi s summar y i s divide d accordin g t o th e topi cheading s i n th e briefin g package .

• 

### Facility-Specifi cInformatio n ..w u .-;•.-(':.; . ' • • •.-•> ' v:. ' ..:-' " . ' Ai. 

### .•ni.. ^( s 

### stru m addresse d th e facility-specifi cemission s estimate s presente d i n Appendi ces ' A , B ^ an d C o f

Enclosur e 1 (p . 1-3 9 throug h 1-89 ) o f th e Septembe r15,199 5 mailou tt o th e team/Workgroup . Ms . Stru m state d tha tJoh n Schweitzer , Composite s Instimte , wa s



# H-P. 6

Madelein e Stru

m Octobe r12 , 199 5 Pag e 3

concerne d tha

tmes e emissions estimate s migh tb e misused . Sh e sai d thatthes e emission s estimate s wer e base d o n acorrectio n o f AP-4 2 factors an

d shoul d no tb e use d fo r complianc e determination s o ri n permittin g situations . Mr . Spooner , with EPA' s pollutio n preventio n (P2 ) division , aske d i f th e emission s estimate s wer e correcte d with respec tt o TRI . Ms . Stru

m sai d tha

tth e value s wer e no t"corrected, " bu tar e calculate d estimate s base d o n recen tfinding s tha tAP-4 2 significantl y underestimate s emissions . Thes e findings are supporte d b y RTI' s recen ttestin g (June 1995) . Becaus e o f th e problem s associate d wi m th e AP-4 2 emissio n factors , i ti s believe d tha tthes e calculate d estimate s wil l provid e amor e accurate estimate o f

facility-wid e emissions . 

## Updat e o n CurrentTestin g A draf to f th e tes treportfo rth e EPA/OR D testin g performe d atReichhol d Chemical s i n Jun

e 199 5 wil l b e submitte d b y RTI t o OR D o n Septembe r29,1995 . Th e result s ar e t o b e presente d a tth e CF A Conferenc e i n Anaheim , C A (Octobe r18-21,1995) . Mr . McNally , Composite s Fabricators Association , offere d t o provid e mor e informatio n o n th e conferenc e t o thos e wh o cal l him . Th e Pultrusio n Industr

y Counci l testin g i n September199 5 examine d pollutio n preventio n measure s an

d abatementscenario s fo rpultrusio n operation s (resi n bat h enclosure s an

d ane w proces s variation) . Thei rtes twil l als o allo w th e compariso n o f EPA Method s 1 8 and 25A . Th e timin g o f th e analysi s an

d release o f

th e result s i s uncertai n (Joh n Schweitze ro f

th e Composite s Instimte wa s no tpresentatth e meetin g t o provid e details) . Th e CF A testin g a

tDo w i n Freeport , Texa s i s i n Phas e I , i n whic h operatin g conditio n variable s are bein g studied . Emission s from manufacturing processe s are bein g momtore d usin g ga s chromatographi c and continuou s hydrocarbo n momtor s (Metho d 25A) , Th e testin g wil l provid e aproces s segmen tcorrelatio n with emissions , usin g avideotap e tha twil l actuall y includ e avisua l representatio n o f emission s durin g eac h phas e (i.e. , resi n application , placin g o f

fibermat , resin rollout ) o f th e process . Testin g als o include s determinin g wha

ti s emitted , and determinin g wher e an d ho w (mechanisms ) emission s occur . Phas e II wil l asses s th e emissio n reductio n effects o f P 2 measures . Anothe rgoa l o f th e progra m i s t o creat

e amode l tha

twil l allo w updating o f

proces s emissio n factors . Mr . McNall y sai d that , s o far , th e numbers are correlatin g with th e OR D results ; i.e. , emission' s ar e significantl y greate rtha n calculate d usin g th e AP-4 2 emissio n factors . Preliminar y result s fo ral l processe s an d acomplete d analysi s fo rhan d layu p shoul d b e availabl e b y th e middl e o f

October . Ms . Strum encourage d th e timel y completio n o f CFA' s testin g s o tha

t th e analyses coul d b e include d i n developin g th e standards . Ms . Strum als o state d tha t anyon e wh o has specifi c tes tdat ashoul d submi tth e results t o EPA . Ms . Stru m aske d Mr . 

# JP. 7

Madelein e Stru

m Octobe r12 , 199 5 Pag e 4

rNielson , Clar

k County , NV , i f

th e ne w LASC O plantha s an y data . Mr . Nielso n note d tha t , f eperformance testin g atth e ne w LASC O (bathware ) plan tshowe d tha tacma l emission s wer e 92 1 tp y usin g Metho d 25A , versu s 28 1 tp y calculate d usin g AP-4 2 factors . Mr . McNall y added tha tth e CF A testin g ha

d no tye tproduce d aspecific , statisticall y vali d emissio n facto rmultiplie rtha tth e CF A fel tcomfortabl e i n recommendin g t o it s membe rcompanies. .

.&< - ORD/RT I Report Ms . Stru m stresse d tha

tthi s repor

ti s apreliminar

y draf tbu twil l no tb e revised furtherb y RTI ; however , th e results displaye d i n thi s repor tare les s importan

tthan th e issue s i tbring s ou tfo rdiscussio n (e.g. , analysi s and mechanic s o f lookin g atMAC T floors) . Sh e pointe d ou ti n Appendi x G ho w th e effec to f vapo rsuppressant

s i s differen ti n differen tresins. Ms . Stru m als o note d tha

tw e are seekin g asemi-quantitativ e wa y o f evaluatin g and accountin g fo rth e emissio n reduction technique s i n use . OA/O C Discussio n o f

Dat aSummar

y Th e preliminary draf

tdat asummar

y i s bein g distribute d s o tha ttea m member s ca n 2 , hel p identif

y any error s an

d assis ti n th e updating o f th e information . Ms . Stru m pointe d ou ttha tthi s i s a"working " preliminar y draf tan d encourage d th e team to submi tcomment s o n th e infonnation . Determinatio n o f

Majo rSource s Thi s discussio n generall y followe d th e lis to f topic s show n i n ite m 7 o f th e briefin g -^packag e (se e Attachmen t1) . Ms . Stru m pointe d ou ttha

tpag e 3- 3 o f

Enclosur e 3 list s th e majo rsource s tha

tsubmitte d aresponse to EPA' s screenin g survey . Ms . Stru m explaine d tha

tatth e presenttime , ES D wishe s t o restrictth e MAC T analysi s t o onl y majo rsources , whic h are define d i n term s o f "potentia

l t o emit " (PTE) , and no tactua l emissions . Ms . Stru

m stated tha

tfacilitie s hav e the potential t o operat e 2 4 hour s aday , 36 5 day s ayear . Therefore , estimate d actua l emission s had t o b e extrapolate d t o representpotential emission s befor e alistin g o f majo rsource s coul d b e developed . Ms . Stru m pointe d ou ttha

ti f EP A wer e t o us e actua

l emissions , facilitie s tha tcoul d potentiall y b e covere d b y th e rul e ma y no tb e include d i n th e MAC T floo rdetermination . I n addition , Ms . Stru m note d tha

tfe w facilitie s kno w thei ractua l emissions . Ms . Stru

m aske d th e tea

m i f w e shoul d wai tfo rtestin g results i n ordert o detennin e accurat e emissio n factors fo r estimatin g major.sources . Ms . Stru m receive d n o respons e fro m th e tea m an d continue d th e discussion . Sh e presente d th e assumption s fo rmajorsourc e determinatio n liste d unde rite m

&P. 8

Madelein e Stru

m Octobe r12 , 199 5 Pag e 5

#7 o f th e briefin g package . Ms . Stru m stated tha

tw e wer e extremel y conservativ e becaus e dat aare no tavailabl e fo ral l majo rsource s an d i twa s considere d desirabl e t o er ro n th e sid e o f overcountin g ratherthan undercounting . Thi s als o ha s th e effec to f allowin g th e MAC T floo rt o b e base d o n mor e source s (more tha n th e minimum o f

5 specifie d i n th e Act) . Mr . Nielso n state d tha

tperhap s the permi tlimit s base d o n PT E coul d b e use d t o identif y majo rsources . Ms . Stru m replied tha

tthi s permi tinfonnatio n i s no tavailabl e t o EPA . Mr . McNall y pointe d ou ttha tCF A members tha

thav e applie d a s a"syntheti c minor " sourc e i n thei rpermits hav e don e s o as amattero f convenience , an

d i twoul d b e inappro priat e t o eliminate the m fro m th e dat abase . Mr . Balagopalan , SCAQMD , sai d thathi s Distric tha s its ow n emissio n factors whic h are differentfrom th e AP-4 2 factors , and tha th e wa s collectin g th e emission s estimate s fo rthei rfacilitie s an d woul d compare thes e result s with th e TRI values . Mr . Nielso n note d tha tth e comparativ e LASC O emissio n result s wer e 28 1 tp y (AP-42) , 47 2 tp y (SCAQM D factors) , an d 92 1 tp y (Metho d 25 A testing) . Mr . Brie , Washingto n State , fel ttha temissio n factors shoul d b e a site-by-sit e determination . H e aske d whethe ronl y majo rsource s o n th e basi s o f acmal emission s coul d b e considere d i n th e MAC T floo rcalculations , sinc e cunen tnon-majors wil l neve rbecom e majo rsources . Ms . Strum state d tha

tth e assumptio n tha

tactua l emissions wer e als o potential emission s had bee n use d i n som e othe rrulemakin g projects . Ms . Strum sai d tha tw e woul d red o th e analysi s o f

majo rsource s assumin g tha tpotential emission s wer e equa l t o actua l emissions . Sh e als o state d tha

tactual emission s tha

twer e base d o n AP-4 2 woul d continu e t o b e correcte d usin g amultiplyin g facto ro f 2. 3 fo rope n moldin g processe s (i.e. , any sprayup , han d layup , ge l coat , o rfilamentwindin g sourc e whos e actua l emission s exceede d 10/2. 3 = 4. 3 tp y woul d b e considere d major) . Missin g dat

a— Ms . Stru m state d thatth e lis to f

potential majo rsource s wa s generate d usin g 3 2 SI C code s an d TR I dat afo rstyrene . Mr . Balagopalan aske d i f othe rHAP' s ar

e emitted . Ms . Stru m responde d tha

tthe y are , an

d stated tha

tstyren e i s th e majo rcontributo rt o emissions . Mar k Bahner , RTI , referre d t o pag e 1- 8 o f Enclosur e 1 tha

tlist s HAP' s from th e industry . Ms . Stru m aske d th e team whethert o includ e thos e source s tha tappeared majo r base d o n TR

I bu tfo rwhic h EP A di d no thav e dat a(processes , resi n use , contro l measures , etc.) . Th e team fel tstrongl y tha tmajorsource s fo rwhic h EPA doe s no thav e dat ashoul d b e include d i n th e MAC T analysis . Ms . Stru m state d tha

tw e woul d supply th e tea m wit h a lis to f th e majo rsource s fo rwhic h additiona l informatio n i s necessary (se e Attachmen t2) . Mr . Santo s requeste d alis to f th e item s EP

A woul d nee d i n orde rt o includ e asourc e i n th e dat abase , an

d Ms . Stru

m indicate d tha

tEP A woul d provid e tha

tinformatio n (se e Attachment3) . 

# 7P. 9

Madelein e Stru

m Octobe r12 , 199 5 Pag e 6



### Stttaategoriaatio n ofth e Industr y Ms . Stru m pointe d ou ttha

tsubcategorizatio n i s necessary du e t o th e very divers e rang e o f processe s an

d product s i n thi s industry . Sh e als o stated tha tal l subcategorie s studie d s o fa

rhave th e potential t o achiev e emissio n reductions . Issue s i n attemptin g t o subcategoriz e b y proces s include : som e unusua l processe s o rproces s combination s don' tfit unde rth e standar

d proces s categories ; som e processes , suc h as vacuum ba g molding , ca n b e considere d eidie raproces s o rapollutio n preventio n technique ; and , shoul d additiona l subcategorie s such a s conosio n resistantproduct s b e considered ? Ms . Stru m presente d th e issue s associate d wit h proces s an

d product subcategorizatio n o f

th e industr

y (ite m 8 o f

th e briefin g package) . Mr . McNall y pointe d ou tth e problem s inheren ti n subcategorizin g b y producttype ; fo rexample , bathtub s ca n b e mad e b y any o f severa l processes , an

d availabl e contro l measure s ma y no tb e applicabl e t o al l o f thes e processes . Mr . Bahne rstresse d tha tRTI' s analysi s fo ratub/showe rsubcategory (Enclosur e 2 i n th e Septembe r15 , 199 5 mailout) wa s restricte d t o product

s made b y the ge l coatin g an d sprayu p processes . Mr . Balagopala n sai d tha tSCAQMD' s Rul e 116 2 allow s achoice : materia l (maximum resi n monome rpercentag e b y resi n category ) o rselectio n o f lowe remittin g process . H e als o sai d tha ti ti s easie rt o mak e standards based o n processes . Mr . Balagopala n stated tha

tSCAQM D use s materia l standard s fo rconosio n resistant , fire retardant, genera l purpose , and hig h strengt h resins , and fo rpigmente d an

d non-pigmente d ge l coats . Ms . Stru m stated tha

ti tmigh tb e possibl e t o se tstandards fo rope n moldin g processe s onl y usin g thes e fou rclassifications . Sh e state d tha tw e shoul d ad

d th e material classification s t o the industr y checklis t(Attachmen t3) . Ms . Strum state d tha

tthe checklis ti s avoluntar y survey an

d tha tEPA i s no trequirin g an y facilitie s t o complete an

d submi tth e information . Mr . McNall y aske d i f there i s any limitatio n o n th e voluntar y survey . Ms . Stru

m responded "no. " Mr . McNall y the n recommende d that, i n an y additional dat

agathering performed , EP A reques tinfonnatio n o n material usag e rathe

rtha n calculate d emissions . Ms . Stru m agree d tha

tthi s woul d b e a preferabl e approach . Formato f

th e Standard

s Ms . Stru m stated tha

tsh e wante d t o addres s the forma to f th e standard s fo rope n moldin g processe s sinc e thes e operation s accountfo ra tleas t7 5 percen to f

industr y emissions . Ms . Stru

m presente d emissions reduction technique s liste d o n pag e 3-2 3 o f Enclosur e 3 . Sh e state d diatal l o f th e technique s liste d ma y no tqualif

y a s a n emission s 

# tfP.1 0

Madelein e Strum Octobe r12,199 5 Pag e 7

reductio n techniqu e an d aske d th e tea m whattechnique s shoul d b e retained. N o respons e wa s received an

d Ms . Stru

m suggeste d tha

tth e team revie w m e lis tan d provid e comments . Ms . Strum the n aske d th e tea m i f anyon e wa s awar e o f

afacilit y tha ti s usin g fiow coatin g equipment . Mr . McNall y sai d tha tmos tresi n fiow coatin g equipmenti s use d i n th e boa tmanufacturin g industry , an d i ttypically i s use d t o apply resi n with n o fibe rchoppin g equipment . H e adde d tha tth e CF A wishe s t o evaluate al l potential technique s i n it s tes t program . Th e participants the n discusse d th e averagin g optio n fo rope n moldin g processe s presente d i n Enclosur e 4 o f th e September15,199 5 mailout . Ms . Stru m state d tha

tth e averagin g optio n coul d b e use d t o establis h apoin tsyste m an d tha tcomplianc e woul d b e determine d b y anumber . Ms . Stru m emphasize d thatal l o f th e dat anecessar y t o us e this approac h wer e no tpresentl y available , butcoul d b e acquire d b y th e team workin g together . Sh e stated tha

tan averagin g approac

h provide s flexibility t o th e industr y and allow s fo r futur e emissio n reductions . Mr . McNall y added thatsuc h an approac h woul d no trestric t futur e developments . Ms . Stru m the n proceede d to describ e th e terms i n th e expressio n (whic h ca n b e referre d t o a s th e control status o f th e facility) , an

d explaine d tha

teac h subcategory may hav e adifferentvalu e agains twhic h t o compare the results o f th e calculation . Iti s no tclea rwhethe rthe "cur e factor " woul d apply t o ge l coat s a s wel l a s laminatin g resins, an

d Mr . McNall y offere d t o chec k wit h ge l coa tsupplier s concernin g a cure facto rtha

twoul d b e equitabl e acros s th e board . Ms . Stru m stated tha

ton e concer n i s ho w t o compar e th e dat

acollecte d her

e wi m thos e o f

SCAQMD , whos e testmetho d 30 9 woul d b e use d o rwoul d serv e a s the model fo rapotentiall y revise d testt o determin e acur e factor . Mr . Spoone raske d whethe rthe contro l statu s woul d allo w weightin g fo rpollutio n preventio n measures , and Ms . Stru m explaine d tha

tth e factor s d o accountfo rth e us e o f lo w styren e an d suppresse d resins , and improve d applicatio n techniques . Sh e als o state d tha tth e P 2 provision s adopte d i n th e standard s shoul d provid e a n incentiv e fo rfacilitie s t o switc h t o feedstock s tha

td o no tcontai n styren e an d processe s with lo w o rn o emissions . Mr . McNall y state d diatresi n manufacturer s are competin g t o develo p resin s tha tus e anon-HA P monomer , becaus e o f

th e marketing advantage tha tsuc h aproductwoul d provide . Mr . Bahnerfel ttha

tadditional flexibility woul d b e provide d t o facilitie s i f th e facility coul d us e a n actua l emissio n rat

e t o mee tthe standard . A facility woul d hav e m e choic e betwee n us e o f th e contro l statu s approach an d anothermetho d show n t o b e equivalen tb y wa y o f emissio n measurements . Th e discussio n o f th e us e o f

thi s equivalency approach ende d wit h th e questio n o f

th e baselin e (i.e. , wha

ti s th e industr

y presentl y doing? ) an

d ho w i tshoul d b e established . Ms . Stru m requested tha

tth e team revie w th e averagin g option s an d submi t comments . 

# 7->P.1 1

Madelein e Stru

m Octobe r12 , 199 5 Pag e 8

Nex tStep s Ms . Stru m stated tha

tw e nee d t o reac

h agreemento n th e format s fo rth e standards an d tha tthi s issu e ha

d no tbee n decide d atth e meeting . Sh e encourage d th e team t o sen d o r cal l i n comments o n th e issue s discusse d a tthi s meeting . Sh e mentione d tha tsh e expecte d industr y groups , includin g SM C manufacturing , t o provid e proposal s fo rspecifi c subcatego rie s o f composite fabrication . Mr . McNall y discusse d th e culture d marbl e subcategory , whic h use s mostl y batch mixin g ( aseparat e emissio n pointfrom casting) , with som e continuou s mixin g (with lowe remissions) . H e sai d tha th e woul d loo k int o th e effectivenes s o f vapo rsuppressant

s and continuou s mixer s fo rthi s process . A brie f discussio n occurre d concernin g th e AP-4 2 emissio n factor s fo rthi s sourc e category . Mr . McNall y sai d tha tCF A prefers t o us e other , more accurat e factors whe n they ar e available . Mr . Nielso n pointe d ou ttha tsom e companie s are usin g th e AP-4 2 factor s i n preparing thei rtitl e V permi tapplications . Mr . McNall y aske d whether , i n th e Clark Count

y district , ne w emissions dat acoul d b e inserte d into th e permi ti f i tbecam e availabl e during th e commen tperiod . Mr . Nielso n replied tha ti tcould , buta ne w commen t perio d woul d b e necessary . Ms . Strum state d tha tth e emissio n factors liste d i n AP-4 2 wil l b e changed . Sh e als o pointe d ou ttha tthes e factors do no taffectth e MAC T determination . Ther e wa s ageneral discussio n o n fillers use d i n resins . I n particular , Ms . Stru m questione d th e grou p o n whethe rth e cur e facto ri n th e contro l statu s expressio n shoul d addres s fille d resins . Mr . McNall y state d tha tsom e resin s are formulated t o accep tfillers . H e als o state d tha

tsom e manufacturer

s migh tb e abl e to suppl y emissions dat afo rfille d resins . Ms . Stru

m discusse d assignin g certai n tasks t o th e team t o assis ti n arrivin g a tarul e proposal . Thes e tasks included : chec k di e dat asummar y fo rerrors an

d provid e any ne w informatio n availabl e t o updat e di e summary ; investigate an d provid e informatio n o n additional emissio n reductio n techniques ; an d review an

d provid e reactio n t o di e numerical calculatio n optio n fo rope n moldin g processe s a s presente d i n Enclosur e 4 o f th e Septembe r 15 , 199 5 mailout . Ms . Stru m als o requested tha

tmembers o f

th e tea m revie w draft

s o f th e background informatio n memorandaan d provid e suggestion s fo rchang e o radditional material . Initially , i twa s suggeste d dia tth e industr

y representatives , Messrs . McNall y an d . Schweitzer , revie w atleas tth e industr y profil e an

d proces s descriptio n memo s (t o whic h Mr . McNall y assented) . Mr . Spoone ragree d t o revie w and commen to n th e mem o describin g pollutio n prevention/sourc e reductio n measures . Ms . Stru m encourage d additional team member

s t o contac the ri f

they were intereste d i n reviewin g an y o f thes e 

# loP.1 2



### Madelein e Stru m Octobe r12,199 5 Pag e 9

memos . Ms . Strum als o agree d to prepare achecklis to rtabl e o f informatio n thatcoul d b e use d b y tea m member s (especiall y State o rloca l agenc y personnel ) t o gathe rinformatio n o n th e facilitie s withi n thei rjurisdictions . Thi s checklis twa s forwarde d t o State an d loca l agenc y personne l o n Octobe r6,199 5 (Attachmen t3) .



# itP.1 3


### ATTACHMEN T 1

»» * BRIEFIN G PACKAG E FO R Reinforce d Plasti c Composite s NESHA P Pre-MAC T Meetin g 4 »» » Septembe r 27 . 199 5 1 . Introduction s IsO O

2 . Goal s o f th e Meetin g an d Agend a Revie w XllS.



### — t o agre e upo n a metho d t o determin e (fo rth e purpose s o f analysi s only ) whic h source s i n ou rdat a bas e ar e majo ran d whic h ar e not

.

—full ydiscus s subcategor yissue s an d agre e upo n subcategorzatio n fo rth e industr y —t o discus s (agre e on? ) th e forma t o f th e standard fo rcertai n ope n moldin g typ e processes .

—discus s th e contro l option s reporte d t o b e i n us e fo rcertai n processe s an d associate d issue s

—t o reques t suppor

t an d commitmen t fro m th e tea m t o "fill-in " area s o f missin g dat a an d t o wor k

togethe rt o resolv e issue s wit h regar d t o subcategorization/forma t o f th e standard

2 J Facility-Specifi c Informatio n li3 0 

## (clarificatio n o f

emission s estimates ) —Thi s refers t o Enclosur e 1 table s whic h lis t facilit yspecifi c emission s

—I t i s importan t t o clarifytha t facility-specifi c informatio n presente d i s no t a n "official " correctio n t o specifi c facilities ' calculation s an d shoul d no t b e misuse d by permittin g authoritie s no rcaus e an yparticula rfacilit yan yproblems

. 4_ . Update on Curren tTestin g Xl23.



### —Offic e of Researc h an d Developmen t Testin g (don e a t th e laborator yo f Reicchol d Chemicals )

—Pultrusio n Industr

yCounci l testin g (don e at th e laborator yo f Reichhol d Chemicals ) 

# \ZP. M



### —Composit e Fabricators Associatio n Testin g o n ope n moldin g processe s (i n a laborator ya t Dow i n Freepor

t Texas ) If anyone knows of any recent plant-specific

testing results, please

let me know.

5 . Brie f Discussio n o f QRD/RT I Repor t (Enclosure s 1 an d 2 ) 1*5 0



### —Too l t o understan d th e mechanics o f calculatin g a MAC T floor , an d th e two format s presented

.

—Preliminar

ydraft repor

t 6 . OA/O C Discussio n o f th e Dati** , fly^a;^ (Enclosur e 3 ) llSS.



### —A "working " preliminar ydraf t o f th e industr

yanalyses

.

—Need s QA/Q C an d updating

. (Thi s i s a solicatio n fo rassistanc e fro m industr y an d S/ L tea m members)

. -Purpos e i s t o addres s an d hopefull yreac h a n agreemen t o n issue s associate d wit h subcategorizatio n an d forma t o f th e standards

. Z, Determinatio n o f Majo r Source s (p . 3- 3 thr u 3-19 ) 2s0 0



### —Tw o reason s wh yther e i s a n issu e o f ho w t o determin e majo rsource s fo rth e purpos e o f analysi s an d determinatio n o f th e MACT floor : 1 ) Potentia l t o Emi t 2 ) Difficult yi n establishin g facilities ' actua l emission s couple d wit h inaccuracie s o f AP-4 2 emissio n factors -Assumption s



### —Facilitie s wer e determine d t o b e majo rsource s b yreviewin g th e response s t o th e Jul y199 3 IC R an d th e 199 2 TRI S data

.

—Assume d tha t a facility' s potential to emit i s tw o time s it s actual

emissions

.

—Base d o n recen t emissio n testing , AP-4 2 underestimate s actua l emission s fro m open-moldin g processe s b ya facto ro f 2.3

. Therefore , facilitie s tha t conduc t open-moldin g processe s (sprayup , han d layup , filamen t winding , an d ge l coating ) wer e include d a s a majo rsourc e i f thei rstyren e emission s wer e equa l t o o rgreate rtha n 2.1 7 tpy

. (2.1 7 x2. 3 = 5 tpy )


# ) 3P.1 5



### —Facilitie s tha t submitte d a n IC R an d woul d hav e emitte d mor e tha n 2.1 7 tp yan d 5 tp yo f styren e (dependin g o n process ) withou t th e us e o f add-o n control s wer e als o included

. —Facilitie s tha t emitte d mor e tha n 2.1 7 tp yo r5 tp y(dependin g o n process ) a s calculate d usin g th e resi n informatio n reporte d o n th e IC R an d th e midpoin t ofth e emissio n facto rrange s liste d i n AP-4 2 wer e als o include d a s majo rsources . -I f facilityproces s wa s unknown , i t was assume d tha t i f th e facilit yemit s mor e tha n 2.1 7 tpy , i t i s majo r —Facilitie s that emitte d mor e tha n 5 tp yo f methylen e chlorid e as determine d fro m th e IC R wer e als o classifie d as majo rsources . • Relevanc e o f Missing Dat a —Th e EP A i s require d t o bas e th e Standard s o n th e 'informatio n availabl e t o th e Administrator "

—Th e analysi s presente d i n enclosur e 3 indicate s tha t there are 48 4 majo rsource s an d tha t 32 1 submitte d informatio n t o th e EPA

. Revision s hav e bee n mad e t o th e numbe ro f source s withi n th e categor y sinc e th e enclosur

e wa s prepared

. Thes e indicat e tha t ther e ar e 44 2 majo r sources . 32 7 o f the m submitte d a survey . (327/44 2 = 7 4 % ) Recen t revision s include d th e deletio n o f man yfacilitie s a s a majo rsourc e becaus e th e facilitie s ar e no t par t o f th e sourc e category , an d th e additio n o f a fe w facilitie s tha t submitte d infonnation

. A lis t ofth e (majo rsource ) facilitie s tha t th e EPA doe s no t hav e informatio n o n wil l b e include d i n th e meetin g minutes

.
fL . Subcategorization o f th e Industr

y Zl2£L

—Enclosur e 3 analyze s subcategorie s base d o n processe s use d an d product s manufactured

. • Issue s Associate d wit hth e Differen t Approache s —Subcategorizatio n b yproces s woul d resul t i n a facilit yimplementin g a differen t MACT standar d fo reac h proces s use d i n th e facility

.



# | 4P.1 6



### Relativel yeasyfo rfacilitie s t o determin e th e standard s that theymus t compl y with

. ''^eertain'processe s ca n b e considere d emissio n contro l technique s an d no t processe s (i.e

. vacuu m ba g moldin g - isn' t i t reall ya P 2 techniqu e fo ra TaM e 2 : W^ A HR^ h iL n i 4 JfM S E?&ff? 2 W ® irt*»tWto f a& m^m- *M»? ee s for

the 

### Shoul d non-proces s attribute s (eg , corrosio n resistance ) als o b e use d t o Tab' w 2 : C W i £t l f

HH^^^nS n (fea

t !ba w Iwm Wca*jfl ^ a s TOSF-W•:.nare«?< ! fe tfv; •ffuqwi^ c wt ' •rk4ft* ,*a.u.s\m

$ MAC ! IkusidMfh -u\

d«:it J -s'-c * w.b»»5.« a***;,«-««••*

* s o



### —Subcategorizatio n b yproduct s wa s investigate d t o determin e i f distinc t produc t typ e grouping s wit h simila remissio n reductio n option s coul d b e developed

. I n addition , th e EPA wante d t o determin e i f facilitie s ar e usin g low HA P emittin g processe s t o produc e simila rproducts

. , , . s.vun e the ? « • Thi s subcategorizatio n woul d require tha t a MACT'standar d b e establishe d 

### fke^ y * * pou>breachproduck^bcategory:" 5 

### ^ ' • ^'^- a 

### ' 1 

### -'^ K : 

### » J

### *' ; 

### ' ; 

### *Y - J " "<• » hs'ii'^ ; «/'

, iS)'.«iJC'. v sou:..,i*,:-

. 7W*1 V

K pi.*'-> w J

M vsiablisiviv : N5AC.' l i SrawiMvi * -;v; e ±dJ.bd.:l :o Ift e 

### N -v-MAC r^Th e product s mahufactuTed bythe^industi ywer e initiall ysegregate d inf o 1 4 iistc ^ Ao<i\'. : 

### ..- categories ] Abou t 7 0 facilitie s manufacture item s tha t fal l int o on e o rmore ujv c •*
- .•'»*»•• • O produc

t subcategories:•-<•**•*•

* **.*.•: i ii*. ' '*..

. • 

### Di,

. Subcategorizatio n b yproduc t coul d potentially'requir e facilitie s t b chang e .!i:;vr. i 

### r 1 

### f£t.;.,nthei rcurren t manufacturin g proces s • ' • • >r..d:_ : 

### . >..»d

.<•••. ..- . .•.»«»...'.-. » •>..

• ..>.•«. M >

• - SubQategorizatio n b y Processe s (p v 3-2 1 an d 3-22V ' ... \ ,. - . , had. i;Kh..'te\;



### - Subcategorizatio n b y Product s Manufacture d (p . 3-3 6 an d 3-37 ) ";>••"••'• • •'•'..•i)-..' : --* ' ^'.birriU',:' ; :•'. ' VH'.-Ar- ' vAVir' 1 i c i-.^ A •H*, J f*''V'' , .••.•.KI.'X T •*^iC' , ^nvt v "».»

- bii:*.w i

. >_.^t j - • •.•JTT.V,-:*

- *«,••'•. " r."-".v.".Vi

- '* * *'• : -.:v > ,-:y !' * :id<:'hk*u

. kwnYt&C',•:.•. * S".^ ^ :>.Ad;d.':.v. ihv i /•"•••*. • 

### 9'« ' Forma to f

,th e Standard s [; ;,,,

, rv 

### ..,,,,.. , y< v ?;>•.«

. v«;..•<-/r^w l the 2t4 5 :>? '
' -Discussio n o f Contro l Option s fo rOpe n Moldin g Processe s U.:: ft-... ( p j j:23 V 3^24 . 3r28 . and 1 3>30l"* u " "

- " u ' " " ; : , ^ - " ,/(oic.vn , ;. u .......•..;»?!- , •.-.-*:-'.-v.*>.

. •..,..•

< ...,...•«••.• • .>.'*.*

; >•:*• * r- v ;:*.•:-.-.. n -:^w-^'.'.t*i--i 2 vv-v^u

. •».!. « ,:.;." • ••?.*>.•: ; -ts f /U'v : •.(-."••t'<•,!!> ' • ::<••:..•«.-. ,, .:.r. , YtjW". ' :• ; '• ' •".' • cv . ,^ , • *. : , ;!iWi'.
- •:£»«*» w 

### s v; 

### .\ , T

—'Examin e emissions/reductio n technique s associate d • with ' ope n moldin g

, , 1 

### , s 

### - v

### processesjirst

. (E.g

. sprayup , han d layup , an d ge l coating ) sinc e thes e operation s

- i r ; 

### accoun t fo rat leas t 75 % o f industr yemission s .. . v . > v• ...•• > '. ' v .,;: . —Page s 3-23 , 3-24 , an d 3-2 8 lis t emissio n reductio n techniques

. Wha t shoul d qualifya s a n emissio n reductio n technique ? Shoul d additiona l subcategorie s b e developed ? (eg

. can' t us e vapo rsuppresse d resin s fo rcorrosio n resistan t 

### n j applications) ? .;,, . .

, _-. i-.\- t 

### »••>*. .,.••••_.Ay^-Au^vc-A.: v,, f 

### . ".• . n '. . cr-A-.sd-r-K-'.'-..M i.'A.w,h" -M-....;• • .*... . -i *-: • •:,')• ; ..•--;.'!• • .•:•;.*..' ' } ^d\:i: ;.!•• •

- Discussio no f a n Averagin g Porma t Optio n(Enclosur e 4 )



# I'dP.1 7



### 10 , Nex t Step s 3*2 0

- Subcategorization an d Forma t o f the Standard s fo r 

### Sprayup i Han d Layup , an d Ge l Coatin g

- E3tplor

e Format s fo r Othe r Subcategorie s

- Receiv e Industr

y Developed Subcategor y Proposal s (e.g. . BMC an d SM C manufacturing . cultured marble . continuou s lamination . 

### etc. )

- Incorporat e New

Tes t Informatio

n int o Analyse s

- Assignment s fo r th e Pre-MAC T Tea

m an d Wor k Grou

p

- QA/Q C o f Dat a Summar y (Enclosur e 3 )

- Investigat e Additiona l Emission Reduction Technique s

- Provid e Dat a t o Implemen t Averaging Forma t an d Wor k Ou t Detail s

- Evaluat e HAP Emissions/Reduction Technique s fro m Cleaning Operation s

- Review

Backgroun

d Memoranda Emissio n Reductio n Technique s Industr yProfil e Processe s

i(j>P.1 8

UV. vW

### m 

## vm w? 

### mi'

WE* .



### vmmf OM 

### n.i mi RO C W O 

### su-*

- UM' * 

### m< AC C

. A5€
- 

### ntr. (m..
CA W 

### co x KA' i
sm* .

( » • <te*

»«."*' • HW-fc * i.Ei > i.eir

. imt PU * *.W A RA N ST*
-P.1 9



### ATTACHMEN

T 2 ANALYSE S O FMAJO RSOURCES FORMAC T DETERMINATIO N
Tabl e 1 : Tabl e 1 lists al l facilitie s thathav e been identifie d a s majo rsource s fo rth e

purpos e o f

determinin g MAC T Standards . Tabl e 2 : Tabl e 2 lists al l facilitie s thathave bee n identified as majo rsource s fo rth e purpos e o f

determinin g MAC T Standard s an d di d no tsubmi tasurvey t o EPA . 

## •••Note s o

n Tfrbtelm d 2•• • I n thi s rulemakin g effort , EP A ha dpreviously determine dtha t amajo r sourc e i s any sourc e tha t actually emit s mor

e than 5 tpy o f

an y one HAP

. Usin g th e 5 tp y specification , a facility' s potential t o emi t

woul db e 2 time s greate

r tha n actua l emission s o r

1 0 tpy
. Table s listin g th e major

source s fo

r th e purpos e o f

establishin g MAC T Standard s were distribute dt o th e Pre-MAC T team/Workgrou p fo r th e Septembe

r 27,199 5 meetin g base do n th e specification s liste dabove

. A t

th e conclusio n ofth e Septembe r 27,199 5 meeting , EP

A determine dthat

thes e criteri amus t

b e revise dandth e analysi s use dt o determine majo r source s shoul db e redone

. Th e EP A ha s revise dth e specification s fo r inclusio n a s amajo

r sourc e fo r MAC T determinatio n andprepare dth e enclose dupdate dtables

. Currently , th e EP A ha s establishe da1 0 tp y leve l o f

emission s fo

r any on e HA

Pa s th e criterio n tha

t define s majo

r source s fo

r MAC T determination

. I n addition , facilitie s tha t emi t mor e tha n 2 5 tp y o f

combinedHAP' s hav e als o bee n included

. Severa l facilitie s hav e bee n includedi n Tabl e 1 tha t hav e TR I emission s belo w 1 0 tpy
. Thes e facilitie s submitte da n industr y surve y to EP A andmajo

r sourc e determinatio n wa s base d o n th e informatio n reporte di n th e survey . In addition , recen t testin g ha s indicate dthat

AP-4 2 underestimate s emission s fromope n molding processes . The EP A ha s incorporate dth e result s o f th e testin g int o th e analysi s o f majo r sourc e determinatio n fo

r facilitie s that

reporte dope n moldin g processes ; therefore , many facilitie s tha t us e ope n moldin g manufacturing processe s an d currently us e AP-4 2 t o estimate th e emission s reporte dt o TRI , hav e been include da s majo r sources . I n addition , fo

r th e purpos e o f

establishin g MAC

T Standards , emission s fro

mfacilitie s were calculate db y assuming that none ofth e facilitie s ar

e usin g an y emission s reductio n techniques

. Therefore , State s an dloca l agencie s shoul dnot

assume tha

t inclusio n o f

an y facilit y i n thes e table s indicate s tha t th e facilit y i s amajo

r sourc e fo r complianc e determination s and enforcemen

t purpose s o r

tha t actual emission s fromth e facilit y are greate

r than 1 0 tpy
. Tabl e 2 list s facilitie s tha t

di dno t submit an industr y survey t o EPA

. Al l facilitie s wit h TR I emission s greate

r tha n 4.3 4 tp y hav e been classifie da s majo r sources . Thi s leve l o f emission s wa s establishe dbase do n recen t testin g andb y assumin g tha t al l facilitie s are usin g open moldin g processe s only

.



# I ITabl a 1

MAJO R SOURCE S SORTE D B Y STAT E

FACILIT Y NAM E

RUBBE R & PLASTI C APPLICATOR S STERLIN G PLUMBIN G GROU P INC . VM C FIBERGLASS PRODUCTS , INC . /TRW3LAS B P CHEMICAL

S INC . SMIT H FIBERGLASS PRODS . INC . TANKINETIC S INC . COLEMAN SPA

S INC . ULTR A INSTALLATION S INC . ACM E FIBERGLASS INC . ACM E REINFORCE D PLASTIC S INC . ADVANCE D SPA DESIGN S ARMORCAS

T PRODS . CO . ASSOCIATE D PLASTIC S INC . BECKET T ENTERPRISE S B P CHEMICAL

S BRISTO L FIBERLIGH T INDUSTRIE S CD R SYSTEM S CORP . CLAR K MFG . CUSTO M FIBREGLASS MFG . CO . GENERA L MARBL E CO . GLASFORM S INC . GOL D SHIEL D FIBERGLASS INC . HES S CO . IND . INC . JACUZZ I WHIRLPOO L BATH INC . JACUZZ I WHIRLPOO L BATH INC . JB I INC . LASC O BATHWAR E LEERWEST MFG/WES

T NEWPOR

T LAMINATE S OWENS-CORNIN G STOCKLANDCO . SUNSE T PLASTICS INC . XERXE S CORP . MFG JUSTI N TANK

S INC . BLU E DOLPHI N FIBERGLASS POOLS CD R SYSTEM S CORP . CLASSI C MOTO R CARRIAGE S COMTEC H SYSTEMS , INC . FLORID A LIN E O F ASTATUL

A INC . FOWLE R MFG . INC . OWEN S CORNIN G FIBERGLA S CORP . SPECIALT

Y PLASTIC S ASSOCIATES . INC . TAMP A FIBERGLASS XERXE S CORP . BATHCRAF

T INC . EUERMFG . FIBERGLAS

S IND . INC . CIT Y

MOBIL E HUNTSVILL E DALEVILL E JONESBOR O LITTL E ROC K HARRISO N CHANDLE R MES A HAYWAR D MARYSVILL E ANAHEI M NORT H HOLLYWOO D RIVERSID E COMPTO N SANT A AN A SANT A AN A CORCORA N CHIN O LON G BEAC H GUAST I SA N JOS E FONTANA LAHABRA IRVIN E SANT A AN A COMPTO N ANAHEI M WOODLAN D ADELANT

O SANT A AN A BAKERSFIEL D IRVIN E ANDERSO N ANAHEI M GEORGETOW N LARG O PALATK A MIAM I SAIN T CLOU D ASTATUL

A ATLANTI C BEAC H AUBURNDAL E LAKELAN D TAMP A LAKELAN D VALDOST

A VALDOST

A FOR T VALLE Y S

T

A L A L A L A R A R A R A Z A Z C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A D E F L F L F L F L F L F L F L FL FL F L GA G A G A REPORTE D

199 2 TR I FACILIT Y TOTA L AI R RELEASE S (TONS ) 4. 2 41. 0 7. 2 5. 2 4. 5 18. 2 6. 0 10. 5 3. 2 19. 1 2. 8 11. 3 6. 8 13. 0 8. 6 15. 5 31. 0 21. 3 3. 0 49. 5 39. 9 20. 7 7. 0 6. 2 183. 5 25. 9 1. 1 8. 4 5. 4 7. 9 6. 9 85. 6 11. 8 20. 6 12. 3 21. 8 7. 2 7. 1 14. 5 10. 0 26. 2 49. 4 8. 4 4. 5



# ' 8P.2 1

INTERNATIONA L MARBL E INC . LASC O BATHWAR E MR . TUB S INC . UNIVERSAL-RUNDL E CORP . CEDAR MFG . FIBR E BOD

Y INDUSTRIES , INC . NORTHWES

T BODIE S INC . UNIVERSAL-RUNDL E CORP . XERXE S CORP . DYNAMI C FABRICATOR S FIBERGLASS SYSTEM S APPUE D COMPOSITES . CORP . B P CHEMICALS INC . FIBERBASI N INC . H&RIND . INC . KEMLITECO . L & M CAS

T STON E PRODS . MARBL E WORK

S MARBLECAS

T PRODUCT

S INC . NATIONA L FIBE R GLASS PRODUCT S OASI S INDUSTRIES , INC . R . D.WERNE R CO . INC . RESINOI D ENGINEERIN G CORP . ROCKWEL L INTERNATIONAL * ROXIT E FIBERGLAS S SPAULDIN G COMPOSITE S CO . (SPECIALT Y PLASTICS DIV. ] SUPERIO R HOM E PRODS . INC . UNIQU E MARBL E PRODS . INC . 20T H CENTURY FIBERGLASS INC . ACCURAT E GLAS S INC . AKE R PLASTIC S CO . INC . ARROWHEA D PLASTI C ENG . INC . BETTE R WA

Y PRODUCT

S INC . BREME N GLA

S INC . C&KPLASTICSINC . CAME O MARBL E COVERMASTE R INC . EAGL E CRAF

T INC . EAGLE-PICHE R IND . INC . EAGLE-PICHE R IND . INC . EAGLE-PICHE R INDUSTRIE S INC . FIBER-TRO N CORP . GENCOR P AUTOMOTIV E INC . GENCOR P AUTOMOTIV E INC . GLOBAL GLASS INC . GOL D SHIEL D FIBERGLASS INC . GOL D SHIEL D FIBERGLASS INC . GREA T DAN E TRAILER S INC . HOLIDA Y RAMBLE R CORP . INDUSTRIA L DIELECTRIC S INC . INTERPLASTICCORP . KREIDERMFG.INC . LEE R INC . LEE R MIDWEST MASTE R FA B INC . MILLENNIU M PRODUCT S INC . OWENS-CORNIN G FIBERGLA S PLASTI C COMPOSITE S CORP . QUALIT Y COMPONENT

S INC . RANC H FIBERGLA

S INC . STANDAR D GLAS , INC . WOODSTOC K CORDEL E SUGA R HIL L UNIO N POIN T CEDA R RAPIDS SWEACIT

Y MANSO N OTTUMW

A TIPTO N RATHDRU M BOIS E SAIN T CHARLES SAIN T CHARLES CHICAG O BEECHE R JOLIET CHICAG O SOUT H ELGI N WHEELIN G ROMEOVILL E BATAVIA FRANKLI N PAR K SKOKI E CENTRALIA ROC KFALL

S DEKAL B MARYVILL E EFFINGHA M ELKHAR T TERR E HAUT E PLYMOUT H MUNCI E NE W PARI S BREME N MILLERSBUR G NE W ALBAN

Y ELKHAR T PLYMOUT H HUNTINGTO N ASHLE Y GRABIL L ELKHAR T MARIO N SHELBYVILL E ELKHAR T DECATU R DECATU R BRAZI L WAKARUS

A NOBLESVILL E SOUT H BEN D LIGONIE R ELKHAR T ELKHAR T GOSHE N ELKHAR T VALPARAISO FORT WAYN E ELKHAR T ELKHAR T FIREME N GA GA G A GA I A I A I A I A I A I D I D I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N 2. 5

170. 7 6. 3 94. 2 15. 3 9. 4 121. 4 36. 4 15. 1

59. 2 5. 6 7. 3 33. 9 4. 7 22. 8 4. 4 35. 5 32. 4

4. 7 8. 5 4. 5 32. 4 10. 8 109. 2 7. 5 7. 5 57. 8 10. 2 11. 0 79. 5 6. 2 4. 1 3. 4 7. 1 15. 3 40. 7 44. 0 12. 3 12. 9 64. 0 0. 0 18. 7 0. 7 5. 0 20. 0 3. 6 66. 5 27. 0 57. 7 18. 5 4. 0 7. 0 10. 7 

# nSTARCRAF T AUTOMOTIV E CORP . SUPREM E CORP . ULTRA/GLA

S O F LAKEVILL E INC . VE E ENG . INC . VIKIN G FORME D PRODS . BOEIN G WICHIT

A CHARLOMA FIBERGLASS INC . DIAMON D COAC H CORP . FIBERGLASS FORM S INC . KBKIND . INC . LIT E MFG . MARLE Y COOLIN G TOWE R CO . PALME R MFG . & TAN KINC . RIGI D FOR M INC . SMIT H FIBERGLASS PRODS . INC . DOM-FAB , INC . EBONIT E INTL . INC . FOSRO C INC . SYNTECHNIC S INC . TOMKIN S IND . INC . GM C (INLAN D FISHE R GUID E DIV. ) INDUSTRIA L PIP E & PLASTIC S RESI N SYS . INC . INTERNATIONA L PAPE R XERXE S CORP . FIBERGLASS PRODS . INC . BELDIN G TAN KTECHNOLOG Y (F.K A D & R FABRICATION ) CONWA Y PRODUCT

S CORP . DGPINC . E-T- M ENTS . INC . FALL S FIBERGLA

S PRODS . INC . GENCOR P AUTOMOTIV E INC . GREA T LAKE S PLASTIC S CORP . HASTING S GROU P INC . HASTING S REINFORCE D PLASTICS LASC O BATHWAR E MOLDE D PLASTI C IND . INC . CARSTEN S IND . INC . ECOWATE R SYSTEM S GLASSTIT E INC . LUN D IND . MMF G NORDI C FIBERGLASS INC . PEAR L BATH S INC . PRECISIO N FIBERGLASS INC . UNIVERSA L PLASTICS INC . AER O TRANSPORTATIO N PRODS . E D IND . INC . G . W . FIBERGLASS INC . MIRACL E RECREATIO N CO . SEQUENTIAINC . LAVALLE Y CONSTRUCTIO N CO . BAJ A PRODUCT

S LTD . CAIR N STUDI O LTD . CAROLINA COUNTER S CONCEP T PLASTICS INC . EUE R PLUMBINGWAR E ERSHIG S INC . GENERA L MARBL E CO . MURPHY BOD

Y CO . OM C SPRUC E PIN E GOSHE N GOSHE N LAKEVILL E FOR T WAYN E MIDDLEBUR

Y WICHIT A CHERRYVAL E OSWEG O INDEPENDENC E RUS H CENTE R BONNE R SPRING S OLATH E GARDE N CIT

Y PAOL A WICHIT A ERLANGE R HOPKINSVILL E GEORGETOW N PADUCA H FLORENC E MONRO E LAK E CHARLES SULPHU R ODENTO N WILLIAMSPOR

T AUBUR N GREENVILL E HOLLAN D MARLETT E GRAN D LEDG E ALGONA C IONI A HANCOC K BELDIN G HASTING S THRE E RIVER S HOL T MELROS E WOODUR

Y DUNNEL L MINNEAPOLI S CHATFIEL D WARRE N BROOKLYN PAR K GROV E CIT

Y MAPL E GROV E INDEPENDENC E ROGERSVILL E O'FALLO N MONET T GRANDVIE

W BILOX I SALISBUR

Y MOORESVILL E LOCUS T HIG H POIN T WILSO N WILSO N LINCOLNTO N WILSO N SPRUC E PIN E I N I N I N I N I N K S K S K S K S K S K S K S K S K S K S K Y K Y K Y K Y K Y L A L A L A M D M D M E M l M l M l M l M l M l M l M l M l M l M l M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M O M O M O M O M O M S N C N C N C N C N C N C N C N C N C P2 2 '" > " *

5. 0 35. 6 14. 0 5. 0 47. 0 17. 5 19. 6 16. 6 64. 0 8. 9 200. 9 129. 3 77. 2 18. 0 4. 9 20. 1 5. 3 50. 0 76. 1 0. 8 4. 6 6. 8 46. 5 6. 4 15. 0 7. 7 9. 6 17. 1 50. 9 27. 0 17. 0 6. 0 247. 3 13. 9 5. 6 17. 5 33. 7 17. 5 8. 9 16. 1 10. 5 1. 3 23. 1 12. 1 180. 5 11. 0 18. 9 9. 8 4. 4 35. 0 2. 6 10. 1 14. 6 11. 0 10. 5 23. 6PIEDMON T FIBERGLAS S

PRODELINCORP . TIFFAN Y MARBL E & GLASS CO . NORDI C FIBERGLASS INC . A- 1 FIBERGLASS INC . CENTUR Y MFG . CO . GRAYSO N TOO L CO . SQUAR E D COMPAN Y (LINCOLN ) KALWALLCORP . CARSONIT E INT L CORP . ALLIE D SIGNA L LAMINAT E SYSTEM S AN-CORIND L PLASTIC S INC . EMSI G MFG . CORP . GENERA L MARBL E CO . GM C META L CLADDIN G INC . MOHAW KMETA L PRODUCT S INC . A. R . E . INC . A R . E. , INC. , (MASSILLON ) ALLIE D MOULDE D PRODS . INC . AMERICA N CUSTO M IND . INC . AMERICA N CYANIMI D BAILE Y TRANSPORTATIO N PRODUCT S BUD D CO . BUD D CO . BUD D CO . CAMOPLAS

T ACCUFA B INC . CINCINNAT I FIBERGLASS INC . CO R TE C CO . FINDLA Y IND . INC . FINDLA Y IND . INC . GLASG O PLASTIC S INC . GLASTICCORP . GOODYEA R TIR E & RUBBE R CO . HADLOC KPLASTICS CORP . ITE N IND . MAR-BAL INC . MOLDE D FIBE R GLASS CO . MONARC H PLASTI C INC . NAVISTA R INT L TRANSPORTATIO N NEWARTESIA N LIMITE D PARTNERSHI P (MARBL E PLANT ) OMEG A PULTRUSION S INC . PICKEN' S PLASTICS INC . PLAS-TANK

S IND . INC . PREMI X INC . PREMIX/E.M.S . INC . SCHMIT T MARBL E PRODS . INC . STRUCTURA L N A STYL E CREST PRODS . U.S . FIBERGLASS PRODS . INC . XERXE S CORP . XERXE S CORP . BEETL E PLASTICS INC . FIBE R PAD . INC . FIBERCAS

T CO . UNI T PART

S CO . AMERICA N SP

A MFG . CO . BEAVE R COACHE S INC . COUNTR Y COAC H INC . FIBER-FA B INC . KEARNEY/WESTER N POWE R PRODS . MOORESVILL E CONOVE R RANDLEMAN DEVIL S LAK E HASTING S AUROR A MINDE N LINCOL N BO W CARSO N CIT

Y HOOSIC KFALL

S NORT H TONAWAND

A HUDSO N HORNEL L MASSENA NORT H TONAWAND

A FRANKFOR

T MOUNTEATO N MASSILLO N BRYAN SYLVANIA PERRYSBUR G CONNEAU T VA N WER T CARE Y NORT H BALTIMOR E CHILLICOTH E BATAVI A WASHINGTO N COURT FINDLA Y FINDLA Y SPRINGFIEL D SOUT H EUCU D JACKSO N GENEV A ASHTABUL

A CHAGRI N FALL

S ASHTABUL

A ORRVILL E COLUMBU S MANSFIEL D AUROR A ASHTABUL

A FAIRFIEL D NORT H KINGSVILL E LANCASTE R LOVELAN D CHARDO N FREMON T MIDDLEBRANC H AVO N NORT H RIDGEVILL E ARDMOR E TULS A SAN D SPRING S OKLAHOM

A CIT Y WOODBUR N BEN D JUNCTIO N CIT

Y GERVAI S HOO D RIVE R N C N C N C N D N E N E N E N E N H N V NY N Y N Y NY N Y N Y N Y O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O K O K O K O K O R O R O R O R O R 7. 4

7. 6 46. 1 11. 1 23. 7 20. 5 1. 6 18. 3 4. 5 6. 7 7. 6 15. 3 8. 2 8. 3 7. 9 55. 6 7. 2 13. 9 9. 5 34. 0 25. 3 36. 2 15. 2 15. 5 119. 5 12. 6 4. 7 5. 1 27. 4 35. 2 8. 5 2. 6 12. 5 4. 6 4. 7 7. 5 32. 4 13. 9 7. 0 14. 5 10. 4 3. 7 3. 1 37. 0 5. 6 24. 0 16. 5 7. 5 33. 0 9. 9 7. 5 9. 1 7. 2 7. 3 11. 2 

# 2\MARQUI S CORP .

MCCLUR E IND . INC . PLASTI-FA B S . R . SMIT H INC . CREATIV E PULTRUSION S INC . HAYSIT E REINFORCE D PLASTICS JONE S & HUN T INC . LASCO BATHWAR E LEE R INC . MCCLARI N PLASTIC S INC . MOLDE D FIBE R GLAS S TRA Y CO . OWEN S CORNIN G FIBERGLA S CORP . PLASTI C DEVELOPMEN T CO . RESOUT E RYNON E MFG . CORP . UNITE D PANE L INC . UNIVERSAL-RUNDL E CORP . WARMINSTE R FIBERGLASS CO . PARTHENO N MARBL E PRODUCTS , INC . SHAKESPEAR E CO . RAVE N IND . INC . SIMON-TELELECTINC . ADVANC E TRANSFORME R CO . AQU A GLASS CORP . CHEMGRAT E CORP . COLUMBI A SPECIALTIE S INC . CONTINENTA L CAMPE R CO . INC . ELECTRIC-GLAS S INC . IK G IND . IMAGE S PRODUCT

S COR P NEWARTESIA N MANAGEMEN T CO . QUAZIT E SEQUENTI A INC . ACCEN T MARBL E CO . INC . AMERON , INC. , (BURKBURNETT ) AUSTI N COUNTERTOP S INC . BELCOMFG.CO.INC . CERAMI C COOLIN G TOWE R CO . CLARK E PRODUCT

S INC . COMPOSIT E TECHNOLOG Y (W.R . GRAC E & CO. ) CRAI G BAKE R MARBL E CO . INC . DIAMON D FIBERGLAS S ENDUR O FIBERGLAS S SYS . INC . FIBERFLE

X INC . FIBERGLASS SPECIALTIE S INC , FIBERGRATECORP . HARWOO D IND . INC . INDUSTRIA L MODELS INC . KOHLERCO . LEE-VA R INC . OWENS-CORNIN G PERMIA N FIBERGLAS S PRESTIGIOU S ACCESSORIE S INC . RE D EWAL D INC . S . W . C . INDUSTRIES , INC . (SWIRL-WA Y DIV. ) TOMKIN S IND . INC . VADC O MARBL E INC . W . R . GRAC E - COMPOSIT E TECHNOLOGY WARMINSTE R FIBERGLASS CO . XERXE S CORP . DELT A FIBERGLAS S STRUCTURE S INDEPENDENC E PORTLAN D TUALATI N CANB Y ALU M BAN K ERI E ORW1GSBUR

G ELIZABETHTOWN MILTO N HANOVE R UNESVILL E MOUN T UNIO N WILLIAMSPOR

T ZEUENOPL E SAYR E MOUNT BETHE L NEWCASTL E SOUTHAMPTO N GREENVILL E NEWBERR

Y SIOU X FALL

S WATERTOWN WARTBURG ADAMSVILL E PINE Y FLAT S COLUMBIA LAFOLLETT E JACKSO N NASHVILL E ERWI N COVINGTO N LENOI R CIT

Y GRAN D JUNCTIO N HOUSTO N BURKBURNET

T AUSTI N BELTO N FOR T WORTH GRAN D PRAIRI E FOR T WORTH BARKE R VICTORI A HOUSTO N BI G SPRIN G HENDERSO N STEPHENVILL E TYLE R GAINESVILL E BROWNWOO D ANDREW

S CONRO E MIDLAN D TYLE R KARNE S CIT Y HENDERSO N LANCASTE R HOUSTO N FOR T WORTH JACKSONVILL E SEGUI N SAL T LAK E CIT Y O R

O R O R O R P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A P A S C S C S D S D T N T N T N T N T N T N T N T N T N T N T N T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X U T 5. 5

7. 1 11. 0 26. 0 4. 5 4. 7 34. 3 32. 5 6. 9 6. 0 34. 7 7. 8 6. 4 1.2 73. 4 5. 6 19. 9 19. 0 3. 0 48. 0 .113. 4 8. 2 2. 0 12. 7 2. 1 7. 8 8. 0

.. * 16. 1 39. 2 6. 6 4. 5 7. 0 4. 9 4. 8 1. 0 4. 8 12. 6 10. 3 11. 9 14. 4 30. 3 5. 1 7. 4 32. 6 135. 3 19. 6 22. 0 12. 9 14. 5 17. 0 52. 4 8. 8 4. 0 43. 0 15. 9 

# £ 2FABALL ENTS . O F UTA H INC .

HERCULES (BACCHU S WORK S •PLANT 2 ) APPALACHIAN PLASTICS INC . FIBERGLAS

S ENG . CORP . TOMKIN S IND . INC . AMERICA N REINFORCE D PLASTIC S AMTEC H CORP . ATTBA R PLASTICS INC . CHEMGRAT E CORP . DISCOVER

Y SPAS ERSHIG S INC . FIBERGLASS TECH . IND . FIBRE X CORP . HYDR O SWIR L MFG . CORP . HYTE C INC . (LASCO BATHWARE ) LIVINGSTO N INC . MELCHE R MFG . CO . INC . ASHLE YFURNITUR E IND . INC . BRAD YUS A

INC . CONTEMPORAR

Y PRODUCT

S INC . CORROSIO N TECHNOLOG Y INC . FIBERDOM E INC . GP I CORP . JOHNSO N TRUC KBODIE S KRUEGE R INTERNATIONA L INC . LIPPERTCORP . MENASHACORP . TELC O INC . O F MANAW A W . H . BRAD

Y CO . (MILWAUKEE) AKE R PLASTICS CO . INC . CLEARFIEL D CLEARFIEL D GLAD E SPRIN G MIDLAN D SOUT H BOSTO N TACOMA YEL M VANCOUVE R WOODINVILL E VANCOUVE R BELLINGHAM SPOKAN E BURUNGTO N BELLINGHAM YEL M AUBUR N SPOKAN E WHITEHAL L MILWAUKE E MENOMONE E FALL

S HOWAR D LAK E MILLS SCHOFIEL D RIC E LAK

E GREE N BA

Y MENOMONE E FALL

S WATERTOW N MANAW A MILWAUKE E MARTINSBUR G U T U T V A V A V A W A W A W A W A W A W A W A W A W A W A W A W A W l W l W l W l W l W l W l W l W l W l W l W l WV 0. 4

5. 1 0. 0 91. 0 14. 8 2. 8 15. 6 4. 5 7. 2 9. 3 12. 3 4. 2 7. 7 204. 4 19. 1 4. 7 12. 4 63. 5 6. 2 5. 9 7. 7 8. 0 17. 3 0. 3 22. 7 7. 1 103. 4



# & 3Tabl e 2

Thes e facilitie s submitte d a n incomplet e surve y o r di d not submi t a surve y SORTE D B

Y STAT E (facilit y wit h TR I emission s >4.3 4 o r TR I emission s » 0 1 FACILIT Y NAM E CIT Y

TANKINETIC S INC . HARRISO N COLEMAN SPAS INC . CHANDLE R ULTR A INSTALLATION S INC . MES A ADVANCE D SPA DESIGN S ANAHEI M BECKET T ENTERPRISE S COMPTO N JACUZZ I WHIRLPOO L BATH INC . SANT A AN A JACUZZ I WHIRLPOO L BATH INC . IRVIN E JBIINC . COMPTO N LEE R WEST WOODLAN D OWENS-CORNIN G BAKERSFIEL D SILVESTR I STUDI O INC . LOS ANGELES STOCKLAN D CO . IRVIN E OWEN S CORNIN G FIBERGLA S CORP . AUBURNDAL E TAMP A FIBERGLASS TAMP A DYNAMI C FABRICATOR S RATHDRU M B P CHEMICAL

S INC . SAIN T CHARLES FIBERBASI N INC . CHICAG O L & M CAS

T STON E PRODS . CHICAG O MARBL E WORK

S SOUT H ELGI N MARBLECAS

T PRODUCT

S INC . WHEEUN G ROXIT E FIBERGLASS ROC KFAU S UNIQU E MARBL E PRODS . INC . EFFINGHA M BETTE R WA

YPRODUCT

S INC . NE W PARI S FIBER-TRONCORP . ELKHAR T FOREMAN IND . INC . WARSA W GENCOR P AUTOMOTIV E INC . SHELBYVILL E INTERPLASTICCORP . SOUT H BEN D MASTE R FAB INC . GOSHE N QUALIT Y COMPONENT

S INC . ELKHAR T STARCRAF

T AUTOMOTIV E CORP . GOSHE N SUBARU-ISUZ U AUTOMOTIV E INC . LAFAYETTE SUPREM E CORP . GOSHE N VE E ENG . INC . FOR T WAYN E VIKIN G FORME D PRODS . MIDDLEBUR Y LIT E MFG . BONNE R SPRING S PALME R MFG . & TAN K

INC . GARDE N CIT Y RIGI D FOR M INC . PAOL A FOSRO C INC . GEORGETOWN INDUSTRIA L PIP E & PLASTIC S LAK E CHARLES RESI N SYS . INC . SULPHU R BRUNSWIC KCORP . MUSKEGO N CONWA Y PRODUCT

S CORP . HOLLAN D DG P INC . MARLETTE E-T- M ENTS . INC . GRAN D LEDG E FALL S FIBERGLA

S PRODS . INC . ALGONA C K B LIGHTIN G INC . KENTWOO D KEELE R BRAS

S AUTOMOTIV E KENTWOO D CARSTEN S IND ; INC . MELROS E MMF G CHATFIEL D PRECISIO N FIBERGLAS S INC . GROV E CIT Y CAIR N STUDI O LTD . MOORESVILL E OM C SPRUC E PIN E SPRUC E PIN E TIFFAN Y MARBL E & GLASS CO . RANDLEMA N GM C MASSEN A METAL CLADDIN G INC . NORT H MOHAW KMETA L PRODUCT

S INC . FRANKFOR T


## •24 - ST

A R A Z AZ C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A C A F L F L I D I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N I N K S K S K S K Y L A L A M l M l M l M l M l M l M l M N M N M N N C N C N C N Y NY N Y REPORTE D 199 2 TR I FACIUT Y TOTA L AI R RELEASE S (TONS ) 4. 5 18. 2 6. 0 19. 1 6. 8 7. 0 20. 7 6. 2 25. 9 5. 4 0. 0 7. 9 14. 5 10. 0 15. 1 59. 2 5. 6 4. 7 22. 8 4. 4 4. 7 4. 5 7. 5 15. 3 0. 0 44. 0 5. 0 27. 0 7. 0 5. 0 0. 0 35. 6 5. 0 47. 0 200. 9 77. 2 18. 0 5. 3 4. 6 6. 8 0. 0 15. 0 7. 7 9. 6 17. 1 0. 0 0. 0 5. 6 17. 5 10. 5 35. 0 23. 6 46. 1 i 8. 2 8. 3 7. 9P.2 7

AMERICA N CUSTO M IND . INC . CAMOPLASTACCUFA B INC . CINCINNAT I FIBERGLASS INC . FINDLA Y IND . INC . FINDLA Y IND . INC . GLASTICCORP . GREENVILL E TECH . INC . HADLOC KPLASTICS CORP . MAR-BA L INC . PLAS-TANK

S IND . INC . PREMI X INC . PREMIX/E.M.S . INC . XERXE S CORP . UNI T PART

S CO . AMERICA N SP

A MFG . CO . FIBER-FA B INC . COLONIA L FIBERGLAS S IND . INC . MCCLARI N PLASTIC S INC . AUGUST A FIBERGUS S COATING S ADVANC E TRANSFORME R CO . CHEMGRAT E CORP . QUAZIT E BELCOMFG.CO.INC . CLARKE PRODUCT

S INC . CRAI G BAKE R MARBL E CO . INC . HARWOO D IND . INC . INDUSTRIA L MODELS INC . LEE-VA R INC . OWENS-CORNIN G PERMIA N FIBERGLASS VADC O MARBL E INC . FENC O INC . CHEMGRAT E CORP . DISCOVERY SPAS FIBERGLAS S TECH . IND . HYDR O SWIR L MFG . CORP . ASHLEY FURNITUR E IND . INC . CORROSIO N TECHNOLOG Y INC . GENERA L FIBERGLASS SUPPL Y MASTERMOL D INC . TELC O INC . O F MANAW A SYLVANI A CHILLICOTH E BATAVIA FINDLA Y FINDLA Y JEFFERSO N GREENVILL E GENEV A CHAGRI N FALL

S FAIRFIEL D NORT H KINGSVILL E LANCASTE R NORTHRIDGEVILL E OKLAHOMA CIT

Y WOODBUR N GERVAI S HANOVE R HANOVE R BLACKVILL E WARTBUR G PINEY FLAT

S LENOI R CIT

Y BELTO N GRAN D PRAIRI E BARKE R TYLE R GAINESVILL E ANDREW

S CONRO E MIDLAN D HOUSTO N STAUNTO N WOODINVILL E VANCOUVE R SPOKAN E BELLINGHA M WHITEHAL L HOWAR D WAUKESH A JOHNSO N CREE K MANAW A O H

O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O H O K O R O R P A P A S C T N T N T N T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X T X V A W A W A W A W A W l W l W l W l W l 13. 9

15. 2 15. 5 4. 7 12. 6 12. 0 0. 0 8. 5 12. 5 7. 0 14. 5 10. 4 16. 5 9. 9 7. 5 7. 3 0. 0 6. 9 0. 0 48. 0 8. 2 16. 1 7. 0 4. 8 4. 8 5. 1 7. 4 135. 3 19. 6 22. 0 8. 8 0. 0 4. 5 7. 2 12. 3 7. 7 12. 4 5. 9 0. 0 0. 0 7. 1



### 2*S ~P.2 8


### ATTACHMEN

T 3 Instructions : Fil l ou taseparat e shee tfo reach proces s o r resin/material . D o no t

repor t painting

. Facilit y name : Addres s andphone : Contact : Reportin g year :

Manufacturing process : Sprayup Han dLayup Pultrusio n Continuou s Laminatio n Compressio n Moldin g Mfr

. o f SM C Compound.Mfr

. o f BM C CompoundOther (explain ) Filament Windin g Culture dMarble Castin g Centrifuga l Castin g Resi n Transfe r Moldin g Applicatio n Technique s (i f applicable) : Pressure fe

droller s Airles s Other (explain ) Brushe s Flo w coater s Air-assis t Airless/HVLP
Material/Resi n type : Unsaturate dPolyester Vinylester Epoxy Qty

. Used(ton s pe r year) : Bulk Moldin g CompoundShee t Moldin g Compoun d Ge l Coa t (clear) Ge l Coa t (pigmented ) Othe r (explain ) HA P # 1 i n material/resin : Weigh t % a s supplied : HAP # 2 i n material/resin : Weigh t % a s supplied : HA P # 3 i n material/resin : Weigh t % a s supplied : I s HA P adde dt o material/resin : ( y o r n ) HAP:

_ Qt y adde d(ton s pe r

year) : I s filler adde dt o material/resin : ( y o r n ) Qt y adde d(ton s pe r

year) : I s th e material/resi n vapor

suppressed ? ( y o r

n ) Emission s fromproces s (ton s per year):

_ Basis : AP-4 2 testin g Tes t result s o f stati c emissio n test ? ( y o r n ) g/m 2 

### a s applie dg/m 2 

### a s supplie d Product s Manufactured : Produc t classification : Corrosio n Resistant

High Strengt

h Fire Retarden

t Genera

l Purpos e D o you us e an

y emissio n reductio n or

pollutio n preventio n technique s o r add-o n control s durin g Ifa

e manufacturin g proces s (e.g. , vacuumbagging , lo w monome r resi n formulations , carbo n filter system , etc.) ? ( y o r

n ) Lis t types :

Ar e an y HAP s containe di n formulation s use dfo r cleanin g operations ? ( y o r n ) ( Note : Repor

t thi s information onc e fo

r eac h facility ) Qty

. o f cleane r (ton s per year) : HAP : HA P weigh t % :

%P.2 9



### Enclosur e 2 COR E ISSUE S Th e pre-MAC T team

ha s decide d t o begi n developin g standard s fo r th e industr yb yusin g manufacturin g proces s subcategories
. Fo r sprayup , han d layup , and ge l coatin g processes , th e teami s considerin g adoptin g a n averagin g schem e t o determin e compliance
. Thi s approac h coul d potentiall yb e adopte d fo r othe r processes . Issue s tha t reguir e you r inpu t ar e liste d below . Pleas e includ e a rational e fo r eac h respons e tha t yo u provide
. Issu e #1 ; Shoul d fabricatio n o f corrosio n resistan t product s b e considere d a separat e industrysubcategory ? I f yes , pleas e provid e suggestion s fo r th e forma t o f th e standards . Issu e #2 ; Shoul d vacuu m ba g molding b e considere d a pollutio n preventio n (P2 ) techniqu e fo r han d layup an d sprayu p processes , o r shoul d i t b e considere d t o b e a distinc t subcategory ? Issu e #3 : D o yo u believ e tha t th e averagin g forma t (contro l statu s expression ) presente d a t th e meetin g i s workable ? I f so , ca n yo u provid e detail s o n possibl e refinement s t o thi s approach ?

- Issu e #4 : Shoul d soli d filler s adde d t o resin s b e considere d a

P 2 techniqu e (fo r lowerin g th e ne t monome r content ) and , therefore , receiv e credi t i n th e averagin g schem e (an d serv e t o mak e th e floo r mor e stringent) ? I f not , coul d yo u provid e suggestion s fo r th e forma t o f th e standard s fo r fille d resin s an d whethe r a separat e subcategor yshoul d b e established ? Issu e #5 : D o yo u hav e additiona l informatio n o n facilitie s tha t

hav e recentl yconducte d emission s tests ? Issu e #6 : Ho w shoul d th e industr y baselin e b e determined ? Tha t is , ho w shoul d w e us e ou r dat a o n th e us e o f emissio n reductio n measure s t o develo p a baselin e (e.g. , mean , us e o f al l th e data , wors t case , etc.) ?



# 2d*