alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**~-**



# - .' 

## RENO NEWSPAPERS INC Publishers of Reno Gazette-Journal WASHOE COUNTY C01'1PTR{l1 I C," J •••J**.~Lt.~;** 

## 20/2 JUN 21 

## AN II): 31 955 Kuenzli St • P.O. Box 22,000. Reno, NV 89520.775.788.6200 Legal Advertising Office 775.788.6394 WASHOE CO POBOX 11130 RENO NV 89520·0027

STATE OF NEVADA COUNTY OF WASHOE Customer Acct# 349008 ·PO# PH Ad# 1000779916 Legal Ad Cost $248.00

Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That as the legal clerk ofthe Reno Gazette-Journal, a daily newspaper of general circulation published in Reno, Washoe County, State ofNevada, that the notice referenced below has published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper between the dates: 05/25/2012 - 0611912012, for exact publication dates please see last line of Proof ofPublication below. Subscribed and sworn to before me i'.."'.. ··''''''··..''·''m'''''''•.. ,.....,.......... ".. ''''''.... '' ....... "....· ..·a , TANA CICCOTTI .

### ~ Notary Public .. State of Nevada 

# i**~ ,~o)litmElnl**  RtjOOrdod in W".shoo County**~ ~** **~ro:** 1)2·752fJ9--2· Enpires**~&y** HS.**2Ot4~ ~,** 

### ......... "."''''

### ......... "

### ....... ,

## ..".''''

### ........''''.'''",,,'''.,,,'''',

### ........**,.~** 

### JUN 192012 Proof of Publication NOTICE OF .PUBLIC HEARING WASHOE COUNTY DISTRICT BOARD OF HEALTH The Washoe County District Board ofHealth does hereby declare 1:00 p.m., June 28, 2012·, at the Washoe County Health District Conference Room B (1001 E. Ninth Street, Reno) as the· time, date, and place to consider the adoption offive District Board of Health Regulations Governing Air Quality Management for submittal to the U.S. EPA as a revision to the Washoe County portion ofthe Nevada Infrastructure State Implementation Plan tor the 2006 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard. These five regulations are: 030.023 (Evaluation of Registration Application), 030.218 (Demonstration of Compliance), 030.230 (Record Keeping), 030.235 (Requirements for Source Sampling and Testing), and 030.970.A (Part 70 Permit Monitoring and Compliance). Interested persons who may be affected or wish to comment on any action being considered on the above date should appear at the public hearing to submit oral testimony or may address comments, data, views, or arguments in written form to the Washoe County District Board ofHealth, P.O. Box 11130, Reno, NV 89520. Copies oflhe regulations and I·SIP are available at www.washoecounty.uslhealth/aqm/home.html and at the Air Quality Management Division, 1001 E. Ninth Street, Suite AIlS, Reno, NV 89512 for inspection by any Ad Number: 1000779916 Page 1 of2interested person. Matt Smith, Chairman Washoe County District Board of Health No. 779916 May 25 June 6, 19,2012 .

. PROJECT: FINAL INVOICE?: 

## .-.'- (:)

. ACCOUNT NUMBER: 

### I, .30 - 

## "1 VENDOR NUMBER: .



### \0- G; APPROVAL:



### Ad Number: 1000779916 Page 2 of2
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34680-34681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16804]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33616]


Union Pacific Railroad Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--
Central California Traction Company

    Central California Traction Company (CCT) has agreed to grant local 
trackage rights to Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) over 2.9 miles 
of CCT's rail line between milepost 41.9 near Eldercreek Road and 
milepost 44.8, near Polk Junction, in the Sacramento Industrial Park 
and Fruitridge, in and near the City of Sacramento, Sacramento County, 
California. CCT is jointly owned by UP and The Burlington Northern and 
Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF), and, after the trackage rights are 
effective, UP will handle rail cars as the operating agent for BNSF.
    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or after June 
12, 1998.
    The purpose of the local trackage rights is to permit UP to serve 
customers on the line, which UP expects to result

[[Page 34681]]

in an efficient and economical route for the shippers in the City of 
Sacramento.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33616, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Joseph D. Anthofer, Esq., 1416 Dodge Street, #830, Omaha, NE 
68179.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: June 17, 1998.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16804 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
#### People v Farquharson

1st Dept: 139 AD3d 467 (Bronx)

denied 8/16/16 (Garcia, J.)
***Exhibit
      32.1*** ****




**Section 1350
      Certification,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant To**


**Section 906
      of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Rajeev Madhavan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my
      knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented therein.




/S/    RAJEEVMADHAVAN**Rajeev
                Madhavan****Chief
                Executive Officer**November
                8, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 3, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Peter S. Teshima, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.



/S/    PETER S. TESHIMAPeter S. TeshimaCorporate Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 12, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GOODNOISE
CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORMS 10-KSB/A FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998,
AND QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORMS 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      32,618,240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,901,672
<PP&E>                                         187,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (30,775)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,800,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,182,275
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       31,767,593
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       156,555
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,693,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,800,350
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,526
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,295,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,264,105)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,264,105)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,264,105)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.48)
        

</TABLE>
#### Dorothy Conner Shank, joined by her husband and next friend, William C. Shank, *Appellants,*vs. W. H. Tunnicliffe, as Liquidator of the State Bank of Orlando & Trust Company, of Orlando, Florida, *Appellee.*

145 So. 256.

Opinion filed January 9, 1933.

Petition for rehearing denied January 18, 1933.

*George Palmer Garrett,*for Appellants;

*H. M. VoorMs,*fo'r Appellee.

Per Curiam.

The State Bank of Orlando and Trust Company failed and was taken in charge by Appellee as Liquidator in August, 1929. Appellant had a balance of $12,046.67 in the savings department at the time said bank closed and filed her proof of claim with the liquidator as *607the law directs without designating it as a common claim or a preferred claim. The liquidator classified it as a common claim. This suit was brought more than twelve months after the appointment of the liquidator to have it decreed to be a preferred claim and paid as such, a motion to dismiss the bill was granted and this appeal is from that decree.

The record and brief of counsel have been examined and the final decree below is affirmed on authority of Court-right vs. Tunnicliffe, 104 Fla. 720, 140 So. 777.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield and Davis, J.J., concur.

Terrell and Brown, J. J., dissent.

Ellis, J., absent on account of sickness.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2464

Entitled the ‘‘Congressional Health Insurance Accountability Act.’’

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. WOFFORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

Entitled the ‘‘Congressional Health Insurance Accountability

Act.’’

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISQUALIFICATION OF MEMBERS OF CON4 GRESS FROM PARTICIPATING IN THE FED5 ERAL EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFITS PRO6 GRAM.

7 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

8 (1) the Congress has failed to enact legislation

9 that extends health insurance to all Americans and

10 reduces inflation in health care costs;
2

•S 2464 IS

1 (2) Members of Congress may obtain health in2 surance through the Federal Employees Health Ben3 efits Program, which provides Members of Congress

4 with guaranteed and affordable private health insur5 ance, choice of health plans and choice of doctor,

6 and no exclusions for preexisting medical conditions;

7 and

8 (3) Members of Congress currently receive on

9 average a 72 percent contribution of their health in10 surance premiums from their employer, the tax11 payers.

12 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to provide

13 that Members of Congress shall not obtain taxpayer-fi14 nanced health insurance under the favorable conditions es15 tablished through the Federal Employees Health Benefits

16 Program unless Congress enacts health reform legislation

17 that gives the American people the type of affordable,

18 guaranteed health insurance that Members of Congress

19 have provided for themselves.

20 (c) LIMITATION ON FEDERAL EMPLOYEE HEALTH

21 BENEFITS PLAN COVERAGE FOR MEMBERS OF CON22 GRESS.—Effective on January 1, 1995.—

23 (1) the Office of Personnel Management shall—
3

•S 2464 IS

1 (A) terminate the enrollment of any Mem2 ber of Congress in a health benefits plan under

3 chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code; and

4 (B) prohibit the original enrollment, re-en5 rollment, or change of enrollment of any Mem6 ber of Congress in such a plan; and

7 (2) the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk

8 of the House of Representatives shall cease making

9 applicable employee withholdings and Government

10 contributions under section 8906 of title 5, United

11 States Code, for any Member of Congress.

12 (d) CONTINUED COVERAGE.—A Member of Congress

13 who is enrolled in a health benefits plan under chapter

14 89 of title 5, United States Code, on December 31, 1994,

15 may receive continued coverage under section 8905a of

16 such title.

Æ
# Republic of Austria Army visits DLA Distribution

/ Published Jan. 19, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 

Two members of the Republic of Austria Army – Col. Gerhard Schweiger and CWO Walter Wolfram - visited Defense Logistics Agency Distribution on Jan. 14.  The group was visiting the New Cumberland installation to see DLA Distribution’s global capabilities first-hand and to tour the Department of Defense’s largest warehouse, the Eastern Distribution Center. 

The duo began with a DLA Distribution headquarters command overview, highlighting DLA Distribution’s worldwide network, transportation coordination that the organization provides for all of DLA and specialized functions such as kitting and deployable distribution capabilities. 

Schweiger and Wolfram then transitioned to DLA Distribution Susquehanna, to tour the Eastern Distribution Center. The tour included the organization’s key locations, including receiving operations, the Consolidation and Containerization Point, the high-rise storage and retrieval system, and the air line of communication pallet build area.

Schweiger is the Republic of Austria Army’s Defense Cooperation attaché, and provides logistics and transportation support to warfighting customers.  The visit was part of DLA Distribution’s ongoing efforts to partner with warfighting customers to provide efficient, effective, and best value support.
**Exhibit 32.1**     The following certification accompanies Dynamics ResearchCorporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2004 and is not filed as provided in Item601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and ExchangeCommission.Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DynamicsResearch Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the‘Company‘), for the year ended December 31, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the ‘Report‘), the undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to his knowledge:          (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to    Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended    (the ‘Exchange Act‘), fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ James P. Regan       James P. Regan *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*March 15, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 35201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17160]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C., Chapter 35).
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Customer Service Survey--
Regulatory Program, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; ENG 5065; OMB Number 
0710--[To Be Determined].
    Type of Request: New Collection.
    Number of Respondents: 60,000.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 60,000.
    Average Burden Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 15,000.
    Needs And Uses: The survey form will be provided to the public when 
they receive a regulatory product, primarily a permit decision or 
wetland determination. The information collected will be used to 
determine what areas of the program can be improved and to consider 
policy areas which may need revision to improve customer satisfaction. 
Without this customer survey, we could not comply with Executive Order 
12862, ``Setting Customer Service Standards,'' and would have to rely 
on more informal and less structured, and therefore less effective, 
methods of obtaining public input.
    Affected Public: Individuals or Households; Business or Other For-
Profit; Not-For-Profit Institutions; Farms; State, Local or Tribal 
Government.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. James A. Laity.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Laity at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for U.S. Army COE, Room 10202, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: June 22, 1998.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-17160 Filed 6-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
No. 10-265.

#### Janice M. Fleszar, Petitioner v. Department of Labor.

562 U.S. 982, 131 S. Ct. 423,

178 L. Ed. 2d 324,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8297.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 598 F.3d 912.
EXHIBIT 31.1



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Lawrence N. Smith, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Resource Bankshares Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: November 10, 2003 |  | /s/ Lawrence N. Smith
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                        |  | Lawrence N. Smith    



-26-
#### People v Maley

2d Dept: 146 AD3d 815 (Queens)

denied 3/22/17 (Garcia, J.)