alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

ELIZABETH DEBRA ROBBINS

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM INACTIVE STATUS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 28 DB 2019 (No. 34 RST 2019)

Attorney Registration No. 306863

(Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9

th day of May, 2019, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated May 1, 2019, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Elizabeth Debra Robbins, who has been on Inactive Status, has never been suspended 

or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency 

and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and 

is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The 

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall 

be paid by the Petitioner.
No. 10-7339.

#### Refugio Lopez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1096, 131 S. Ct. 807,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9540.

178 L. Ed. 2d 539,

December 6, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 392 Fed. Appx. 245.
#### People v Olah

2d Dept: 139 AD3d 964 (Dutchess)

denied 8/1/16 (Fahey, J.)
# C_2015118EN.01002602.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2015 — Lithuania v Commission

(Case T-365/13) (1)

1

((EAGGF - Guarantee Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Rural development measures - ‘Natural handicaps’ and agri-environment - Appropriateness of controls - Flat-rate financial corrections - Proportionality))

(2015/C 118/34)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas, R. Krasuckaitė and A. Petrauskaitė, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2013/214/EU of 2 May 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2013 L 123, p. 11).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls Commission Implementing Decision 2013/214/EU of 2 May 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as it imposes a financial correction of 5 % with respect to the agro-environmental measures connected with the criterion relating to the use of fertilisers; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls Commission Implementing Decision 2013/214/EU of 2 May 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as it imposes a financial correction of 5 % with respect to the agro-environmental measures connected with the criterion relating to the use of fertilisers;

| 2) | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3) | Orders the Republic of Lithuania and the European Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Republic of Lithuania and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 284, 28.9.2013.

1

---
# Tobyhanna’s Scutt named Employee of the Quarter

/ Published Dec. 17, 2015
TOBYHANNA, Pennsylvania, 
Stacey Scutt, distribution process worker at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Tobyhanna, Pa., has been named Employee of the Quarter for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015.

While working closely with the local Disposition Services personnel who are collocated at Tobyhanna Army Depot, Scutt is the primary point of emphasis within the disposal process. She maintains primary accountability of all items departing the army depot for disposal. This requires a secondary kind, count, condition of items to ensure compliance with demilitarization of military equipment and property requirements as necessary, and involving the local disposition services for any issues with the items.

Additionally, Scutt coordinates with Battle Creek, Mich., to set up transportation requirements in order to move disposal items out of Tobyhanna, Pa. 

Since Jan. 2015, Scutt has accomplished more than 1,400 material release orders destined for disposition services in Mechanicsburg, Pa., as well as more than 1,700 MRO’s to the on base disposition services. 

“Just this quarter alone, Ms. Scutt’s efforts reduced Tobyhanna’s inventory close to 12 million dollars, ensuring productions rates remain low,” said Joseph Malloy, receiving supervisor at DLA Distribution Tobyhanna. 

Furthermore, Scutt works on hazardous material storage, ensuring proper hazardous characteristics code and storage requirements are met. Working with Distribution Headquarters, she validates codes as well as ensuring customers are charged accurately.

“Ms. Scutt regularly works above and beyond to support the Headquarters, Distribution Tobyhanna leadership, Tobyhanna Army Depot and the warfighter,” explains Malloy. “We are honored to possess this outstanding employee whose excellent reputation is well deserved.”
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6964

LARRY D. REAVES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CLAIM REGIONAL OFFICE FIDUCIARY – D.C. OFFICE; JOSE RIVEO,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, 

District Judge. (1:11-cv-00620-AJT-TCB)

Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry D. Reaves, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry D. Reaves appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. Reaves’ 

opening appellate brief is incoherent and fails to conform to 

any of the requirements of Fourth Circuit Local Rule 34(b). By 

failing to raise any issues for appeal, Reaves has abandoned all 

appellate claims. See, e.g., Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 

F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6640

JOHN THOMAS PARKER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, William Douglas

Catoe, Director,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-99-1470-2-13AJ)

Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 27, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tara Dawn Shurling, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Donald

John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John Thomas Parker appeals the district court’s order granting

the Respondents’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his

petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. We uphold the district court’s determination

that Parker has not demonstrated that his trial would have had a

different outcome absent any alleged errors by counsel. See

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Dmitry Tsidulko, Appellant, v K & L Int’l Trading, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[48 NYS3d 493]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), dated October 8, 2015, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

In support of their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that none of the alleged injuries to the cervical and lumbar regions of the plaintiff’s spine constituted a serious injury under either the permanent consequential limitation of use or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Staff v Yshua,*59 AD3d 614 [2009]), and that, in any event, the alleged injuries were not caused by the subject accident *(see generally Jilani v Palmer,*83 AD3d 786, 787 [2011]).

In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether he sustained serious injuries to the cervical and lumbar regions of his spine under the permanent consequential limitation of use and significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and as to whether the alleged injuries were caused by the accident *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]; *Jilani v Palmer,*83 AD3d at 787). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants’ motion.

Mastro, J.R, Leventhal, Hall and Cohen, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Claribel Santos, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 908]

An appeal having *611been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Vil-legas, J.), rendered January 21, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Oing and Singh, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00851-CR

George GALVAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9427

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 9, 2014.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
# Subsistence provides food, water to Fort Jackson after historic South Carolina flooding

/ Published Oct. 9, 2015
PHILADELPHIA, 
Following historic floods there during the last week, meals and water have arrived at Fort Jackson, South Carolina thanks in part to Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support’s Subsistence supply chain.Subsistence employees worked with the regional prime vendor to send Meals, Ready-to-Eat, bottled water and meal kits beginning Oct. 3.The Fort Jackson area received 17.71 inches of rain Oct. 2-5, according to the Richland County Weather Information Network Data System.“Thanks to the DLA team’s quick response and active participation, the Army was able to offer material solutions and immediately support Fort Jackson with three days of MREs and bottled water so they could continue their training mission and concurrently assist the community around Fort Jackson,” said Lt. Col. John Nolan, chief of logistics current operations for the Army.  More than 22,000 cases of MREs were distributed by DLA Distribution centers in Norfolk, Virginia and Albany, Georgia by Oct. 5The prime vendor, US Foods, delivered 2,166 cases of meal kits and 7,128 cases of water to Fort Jackson by Oct. 7. More than 300,000 meals had been delivered through Oct. 7. Subsistence has received requirements for 12,000 more cases of MREs, said Mary Ellen Dobbins, chief of the Subsistence prime vendor program in the continental U.S.Deliveries will continue at least through the weekend, Dobbins said.Fort Jackson supports about 24,000 personnel daily but was closed most of the week with only key and essential personnel reporting for duty.According to the Fort Jackson commanding general’s report, “Fort Jackson has the bottled water and MREs necessary to sustain operations for the next three days, at least, and expects to be able to maintain three days of supply of MREs and water for at least the next week.”
# DLA shares Child Abuse Prevention Month efforts with DOD

/ Published April 29, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Representatives from the Defense Logistics Agency joined the military services in highlighting efforts to observe this month’s focus on child abuse prevention during a virtual event April 28.

Lisa Grenon and Michiel DeVito, family program managers with DLA Installation Management at Battle Creek, Michigan, and Columbus, Ohio, respectively, presented the agency’s CAPM events to Patricia Barron, deputy assistant secretary of defense for military community and family policy.

DLA’s CAPM efforts included display tables with information about awareness, web resources and pinwheel parades.

“In addition, we try to add our own flair and interest with events such as Sip (Tea) ‘n Paint, the Clothesline Project and Chalk the Walk,” in which participants receive tips on preventing and reporting child abuse, Grenon said.

Ongoing awareness projects such as Healing Rocks and the Hope Garden keep child abuse awareness and positive parenting in focus year-round, Grenon said. The rocks are painted with positive messages every April by DLA employees and placed in a Healing Rock Garden. The Hope Garden is dedicated to remembering victims of violence and features native trees, a memory bench, pedestal and plants.

“Pinwheels are placed around the garden in April in recognition of Child Abuse Prevention Month,” Grenon said. “Because these projects involve multiple installation organizations, they become a force multiplier for the child-abuse prevention message.” 

The pinwheel was selected as the national symbol for child abuse prevention by Prevent Child Abuse America because it represents playfulness, joy and childhood.

Outreach and education efforts are important to preventing child abuse, DeVito said. Programs like Project Kindness and the Child Development Center’s Parent Resource Center provide information about parenting and child development.

DLA’s Morale, Welfare and Recreation website also offer resources for families, she said.

“As we have adapted over the last two years, we have increased our education and prevention using technology, which includes providing on-demand resources and educational videos,” DeVito said. “Our community is often spread over an entire country and sometimes in different countries. Using digital platforms allows us to connect with our community members wherever they are located.”

The MWR website offer videos and seminars on decreasing stress, which can prevent abuse, and topics range from how to balance a checkbook to teaching teens how to behave appropriately on social media. Events are recorded and archived for easy viewing.

“By making an archive and holding those resources on a digital platform, we multiply the number of people who can reach it,” DeVito said. “Sometimes it’s tough to find a good speaker for some of these topics, so by banding together and pooling those really good resources, we can take advantage of that.”

April is also Month of the Military Child.
# C_2014421EN.01004302.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/43

---

Order of the General Court of 2 October 2014 — Marcuccio v Commisison

(Case T-447/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Reimbursement of recoverable costs - Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal - Availability of a parallel remedy - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

2014/C 421/61

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: initially, C. Berardis-Kayser and J. Banquero Cruz, and subsequently C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (single judge) of 18 June 2013 in Case F-143/11 Marcuccio v Commission, ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:81, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the present case. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the present case.

---

(1)  OJ C 291, 5.10.2013.

1

---
No. 09-8733.

#### Arturo Sanchez-Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 948, 131 S. Ct. 64,

178 L. Ed. 2d 244,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7660.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 928.
*July 6, 2017*

2017-Ohio-5723.]

2017-0417.

#### State ex rel. Lopez v. Summit Cty. Clerk of Courts.

In Mandamus. Relator has not filed a merit brief, due June 29, 2017, in compliance with the Rules of *1467Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Cause dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<CIK>             0000031364                        
<NAME>            ECKERD COPRORATION                       
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000                               
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                               71,874
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       105,393
<ALLOWANCES>                          3,000
<INVENTORY>                         973,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,151,441
<PP&E>                              775,690
<DEPRECIATION>                      329,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,891,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               783,682
<BONDS>                             779,951
<COMMON>                                704
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                          159,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,891,952
<SALES>                           5,376,221
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  5,376,221
<CGS>                             4,192,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     4,192,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    980,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      5,122
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   60,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     137,259
<INCOME-TAX>                         33,322
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 103,937
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      (1,499)
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        102,438
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          1.46 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                          1.42 <F1>
<FN>                         
<F1>EPS PRIMARY AND DILUTED REFLECTS THE TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT EFFECTED IN THE
    FORM OF A STOCK DIVIDEND WHICH WAS PAID ON MAY 13, 1996 TO STOCKHOLDERS OF
    RECORD ON APRIL 22, 1996.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014448EN.01002402.xml

| 15.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/24

---

Order of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Nikolaou v Commission and ECB

(Case T-331/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Cyprus stability support programme - Declaration of the Eurogroup concerning the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus - Erroneous identification of the defendant in the application - Inadmissibility))

(2014/C 448/32)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marinos Nikolaou (Strovolos, Cyprus) (represented by: E. Efstathiou, K. Efstathiou and K. Liasidou, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, J.-P. Keppenne and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents); and European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, N. Lenihan and F. Athanasiou, acting as Agents, and by W. Bussian, W. Devroe and D. Arts, lawyers)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the declaration of the Eurogroup of 25 March 2013 concerning, inter alia, the restructuring of the banking sector in Cyprus.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Marinos Nikolaou is ordered to pay, in addition to his own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Marinos Nikolaou is ordered to pay, in addition to his own costs, the costs incurred by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank (ECB).

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.

1

---