alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TXU Corp. Non-employee Director Compensation Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Non-employee Director Compensation Arrangements 
 Until July 1, 2006, each non-employee director
of the TXU Corp. Board of Directors (the “Board”) is compensated as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	An annual Board retainer of $45,000, payable in cash; 

  

	 	•	 	A fee of $1,500 for each Board meeting attended and $1,250 for each committee meeting attended; 

  

	 	•	 	An annual retainer of $5,000 for non-chair members of the Audit and Nuclear Committees; 

  

	 	•	 	An annual retainer of $10,000 for service as chair of the Audit and Nuclear Committees; 

  

	 	•	 	An annual retainer of $5,000 for service as chair of any other Board committee; 

  

	 	•	 	An annual grant of TXU Corp. common stock units having value of $60,000; and 

  

	 	•	 	An additional annual retainer of $10,000 for service as Lead Independent Director of the Board. 

 Effective July 1, 2006, each non-employee director of the Board will be compensated as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	An annual Board retainer of $45,000, payable in cash and/or TXU Corp. common stock (in 25% increments at the director’s election); 

  

	 	•	 	A fee of $1,500 for each Board meeting and each committee meeting attended; 

  

	 	•	 	An annual retainer of $5,000 for non-chair members of the Audit and Nuclear Committees; 

  

	 	•	 	An annual retainer of $10,000 for service as chair of the Audit and Nuclear Committees; 

  

	 	•	 	An annual retainer of $5,000 for service as chair of any other Board committee; 

  

	 	•	 	An annual grant of TXU Corp. common stock units having value of $100,000; and 

  

	 	•	 	An additional annual retainer of $10,000 for service as Lead Independent Director of the Board. 

 Directors who are officers, or former officers, of TXU Corp. do not receive any fees for service as a director. All directors are reimbursed for
reasonable expenses incurred in connection with their services as directors, which may include use of company aircraft, if available and approved in advance by appropriate company personnel. 
 Directors who receive a retainer for their service as a director may elect to defer, in increments of 25%, all or a portion of such retainer pursuant to
the TXU Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, a trustee purchases TXU Corp. common stock with an amount of cash equal to each participant’s deferred retainer, and accounts are established for
each participant containing performance units equal to such number of shares of TXU Corp. common stock. The Plan investments, including reinvested dividends, are restricted to TXU Corp. common stock. On the expiration of the applicable maturity
period (not fewer than three nor more than ten years, as selected by the participant) or upon death or disability while serving as a director, the value of the participant’s maturing accounts is paid in cash based on the then current value of
the performance units.
# 2024 DLA Hall of Fame inductee: Carol O’Leary

/ Published May 13, 2024
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
*Editor’s Note: This is one of five stories featuring 2024 DLA Hall of Fame inductees. An induction ceremony will be held 2 p.m. May 21 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex auditorium on Fort Belvoir, Virginia. The ceremony is open to all DLA employees; invitations are not needed.*

Carol O’Leary made a name for herself transitioning Defense Logistics Agency Energy’s business model for the military services’ bulk petroleum needs, earning her a place in the 2024 DLA Hall of Fame.

O’Leary was the financial lead and advocate for a phase of a comprehensive mission for Defense Department bulk petroleum that eased the organization from a wholesale fuel business to a retail business. This was a significant event because it meant DLA Energy owned all bulk petroleum from the point of purchase until it’s issued to the aircraft, ship or ground equipment, according to the award nomination.

She also helped transfer funding to sustain and modernize fuel facilities from the military services to DLA and transfer the quality assurance mission from the Defense Contract Management Agency to DLA.

“The transfers, transitions and new DLA Energy missions for which Ms. O'Leary advocated not only changed the way DLA Energy does business, but also helped justify DLA Energy's existence as a major subordinate command and cemented the command's importance to the warfighter,” the nomination noted.

As a financial expert, O’Leary supported expanding DLA Energy's natural gas and electricity missions to help DOD and federal agencies avoid paying higher energy utility. Expanding the two missions also pushed DLA Energy's role beyond petroleum procurement, enhancing the agency’s ability to support diverse energy needs.

Over her 50-year federal career – 40 at DLA – O’Leary influenced employees as a trusted financial advisor and leader, the nomination added. She was known to encourage employees to expand their vision, push the envelope and resist getting stale in their jobs by getting out of their comfort zones.

“Even though her sage advice was often in high demand, her door was always open,” according to the nomination. “She was never too busy to talk to anyone who wanted her guidance about any number of subjects ranging from budget issues to personnel issues to cross-training opportunities.”

O’Leary concluded her career as director of DLA Finance for Energy in 2014 and was inducted into the DLA Energy Hall of Fame in 2018.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. ER98-2020-000]
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Energy Clearinghouse Corporation; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 15, 1998.
    Energy Clearinghouse Corporation (ECC) filed an application for 
authorization to sell power at market-based rates, and for certain 
waivers and authorizations. In particular, ECC requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities by ECC. On June 
1, 1998, the Commission issued an Order Accepting for Filing Proposed 
Market-Based Rates (Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's June 1, 1998 Order granted the request for blanket 
approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in Ordering 
Paragraphs (D), (E), and (G):
    (D) Within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, any 
person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket 
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by 
ECC should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (E) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (D) above, ECC is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of ECC, compatible with the public 
interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    (G) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of ECC's 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities. * * *
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 1, 1998. Copies of 
the full text of the Order are available from the Commission's Public 
Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16297 Filed 6-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Docket No. FAA-2012-0298

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Bombardier Christina Young

416-375-4038

3/23/2011 Called & sent Email. No Objection.

Regional Airline 

Association

Connie Arnold

202-367-1252 3/23/2011

Called & sent Email. No Objection.

Transport Canada Robin Lau

613-952-4461

Anthony Wan

613-352-4410

3/21/2011

Called Robin and Emailed Robin 

and Anthony, No objection
No. 10-6171.

#### Ricardo Gutierrez, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 1011, 131 S. Ct. 522,

178 L. Ed. 2d 385,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8557.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
2017-0619.

#### Harmon v. Hoffman.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. Reported at 150 Ohio St.3d 1404, 2017-Ohio-6964, 78 N.E.3d 906. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. Relator’s motion to amend motion for reconsideration denied as moot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          815286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   556507
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    2067848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4266461
<PP&E>                                         6527848
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2749016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9610513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1393271
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        825649
<OTHER-SE>                                     3936854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9610513
<SALES>                                        6622001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6622001
<CGS>                                          5028783
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6397960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 38444
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               56967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 128849
<INCOME-TAX>                                     59390
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     69459
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No

. 04 -0 9- 00 01 9- CR Fe lipe Ag uilar VILLANUEVA ,

Appellant

v . The STA TE of Texas, Appellee Fr om the 175th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-CR-8864 Honora ble Mary Roman, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Fe bruar y 18, 2009 DI SMI SSED FOR L ACK OF J URI SDI CTI ON The trial c ourt imposed sentenc e on September 22, 2008, and appellant filed a timely motion for ne w trial. The de adline for filing a notice of appea l w as there fore Dec ember 22, 2008. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2(a) (1). A notice of appeal was not filed unt il Dec ember 24, 2008. The c ertificate of service on the notice of

appea l to the B exar County District Attorney ’s Off ice is date d Dec ember

19, 2009. Howeve r, it does not indicate whether the notice of appea l was filed with the c lerk’s of fice by mail a nd the rec ord does not c ontain a copy of an enve lope bea ring a postmark. See V

illareal v.04

- 09

- 00 01 9- CR

- 2- Sta te , 199 S.W .3d 30 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2006, order) , dis p. on me rit

s , N o. 04 -0 6- 00 02 2- CR, 2007 WL 120625 (Tex. App.—San Antonio J an. 19, 2007, pet. r ef’ d) (holding i nmate’s notice of appea l was timely

filed whe n

d e li v e r e d in pr operly -addr essed e nvelope to jail authorities on or be fore du e da te a nd re c e ive d by c le rk wi thi n te n da y s of fi lin g de a dli ne ); T EX . R. A PP . P. 9 .2 . A pp e lla nt d id not file a timely

motion for extension of tim e to file the notice of appe al. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3. B e c a us e the no tic e of a

pp e a l in thi s ca se a

pp e a re d to be unt ime ly , we iss ue d a show c a us e order on J anuar y 16, 2009, order ing a

ppellant to file a r esponse e stablishing that the notice of appe al was timely

filed by mail, or showing cause why the appe al should not be dism i s s ed fo r want of jurisdiction. Se e Ol iv o v. Sta te , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding timely notice of appe al is nece ssary

to invoke court of a

ppeal’ s jurisdiction). I n response , appellant’ s appointed

c ou ns e l f ile d a le tte r s ta tin g that a ft e r r e vie wi ng the re c or d an d spe a kin g wi th t he tr ia l c ou rt ’s c le rk s, he is “una ble to show ca

use why this appeal should not be dismissed for wa nt of jurisdiction.” Acc ording ly , beca

use appe llant has failed to e stablish the notice of a ppeal wa s timely

filed,

we l ack jur isdiction to entertain the appe al. See id. ; se e als o A te r v . E igh th C ou rt o f A pp e als , 80 2 S. W.2 d 2 41 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 91 ) (e xpla ini ng that wri t of ha be a s c or pu s p ur su a nt t o a

rt ic le 11.07 of the Te x as Code of Criminal Procedur e g overns out-of -time appe als from fe lony convictions). Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appeal for w ant of jurisdiction.

PER C URI AM Do no t pu bli sh
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,250
<SECURITIES>                                    37,058
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                       468
<INVENTORY>                                      7,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,924
<PP&E>                                         304,081
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 701,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,278
<BONDS>                                        300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   701,135
<SALES>                                          7,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,242
<CGS>                                           12,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,238
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (63,050)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### Page 1 of 3 Disposition Comments

Docket No: 

### FAA

- 20 1 6

- 42 3 3 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 

### 20 1 6

- CE

- 0 03

- AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.:

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM



### N o C omments/Only Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are

required.

No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes,

lis t latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues

from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA

- IR

- M

- 8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one o

f the following :

If other, explain :

Commenter(s):

What change to the AD action is requested?

Why is the change requested or how is it justified?

Do we agree?

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD:

If PARTIALLY AGREE

, we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO

, we don’t agree because

ISSUE 2 : Select one of the following :

If other, explain :

Commenter(s):

What change to the AD action is requested?

Why is the change requested or how is it justified?

Do we agree?

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD:

If PARTIALLY AGREE

, we agree w ith because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If NO

, we don’t agree because

For additional issues, do uble

- click here

### Page 3 of 3 S ignature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.:

ASE Printed Name : Date

Branch M anager Date
No. 10-170.

#### Brian Martin, et al., Petitioners v. Raquel Hanic, Personal Representative of the Estate of Rudy Escobedo, Deceased.

562 U.S. 962, 131 S. Ct. 463,

178 L. Ed. 2d 288,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7999.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 600 F.3d 770.
No. 10-6908.

#### Gerald Gregg, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1050, 131 S. Ct. 611,

178 L. Ed. 2d 445,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8816.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 155.
#### Wishnefsky v. Evans

12/07/2015

634 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 446
# DLA to explore advanced technologies, small business innovation at R&D Industry Collider Day

/ Published Aug. 24, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency Research and Development team will host Industry Collider Day Sept. 11 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex. This year’s theme is “Forging Tech-Forward Connections to Enable Proactive Global Logistics.”

Attendees from government, industry and academia will participate in interactive sessions to share knowledge that supports military readiness and national security.

DLA R&D experts will also detail their progress on agency manufacturing technology and logistics research programs that focus on additive manufacturing, supply chain management sustainability, battery improvement and energy readiness.

                Brad Bunn, Defense Logistics Agency vice director, and Roxanne Banks, former DLA deputy director of acquisition, congratulate the winners of the 2022 Small Business Innovation Research Program pitch event during last year’s DLA Research and Development Industry Collider Day Sept. 8, 2022. $1 million in contracts were granted to eight small businesses. DLA will again award R&D funding to small businesses that meet requirements for strategic materials and green initiatives at this year’s ICD event on Sept. 11, 2023.                            DLA Industry Collider Day Award Check                            Brad Bunn, Defense Logistics Agency vice director, and Roxanne Banks, former DLA deputy director of acquisition, congratulate the winners of the 2022 Small Business Innovation Research Program pitch event during last year’s DLA Research and Development Industry Collider Day Sept. 8, 2022. $1 million in contracts were granted to eight small businesses. DLA will again award R&D funding to small businesses that meet requirements for strategic materials and green initiatives at this year’s ICD event on Sept. 11, 2023.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Jessice RomanVIRIN: 200924-D-HW629-040As during previous ICDs, small business attendees have the potential to receive on-the-spot contracts in response to solicitations DLA previously issued for R&D proposals on several technology domains. The solicitations, known as broad agency announcements, included detailed problem statements and challenges the agency faces. Two new BAAs were added this year to address 5G smart-warehouse modernization and acquisition modernization.

DLA R&D anticipates adding another BAA in 2024 for research related to strategic and critical materials supply chains that have been compromised by decreased or abandoned domestic mining and refining activities or lack of domestic manufacturing.

ICD is part of DLA’s industry engagement plan and supports warfighters and federal customers by resulting in more effective collaboration with industry and a stronger supply chain.

Register for ICD and learn more about the agenda, pre-enrollment and base access at Eventbrite, or contact the R&D team for more information.
Exhibit 32.2



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James
DiLorenzo , Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






/s/ James DiLorenzo
--------------------------------------------------------
Name: James DiLorenzo
Title: Acting Chief Financial Officer



Date: August 20, 2003
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dane D. Anderson, ChiefFinancial Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of MOCON, Inc.

 

 
| Date: August 15,  2005 |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |
| /s/ Dane D.  Anderson       |   |   |
| Dane D. Anderson            |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer    |   |
|                             |        |  |

 

----