alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16654]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 120 / Tuesday, June 23, 1998 / 
Notices

[[Page 34143]]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Nicholson Land Exchange, Boise National Forest, Boise and Elmore 
Counties, ID

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of intent to prepare environmental 
impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Boise National Forest has cancelled the preparation of an 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the proposed land exchange with 
Thomas T. and Diana R. Nicholson. The previously published Notice of 
Intent appeared in the October 10, 1997, Federal Register, Volume 62, 
Number 197, pages 52964-52965.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning the cancellation 
of the EIS should be directed to Sharon Paris at (208) 373-4157. 
Written requests should be sent to the Boise National Forest, Attn: 
Sharon Paris, 1249 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, ID 83709.

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
Jack G. Troyer,
Deputy Regional Forester, Intermountain Region Forest Service, USDA.
[FR Doc. 98-16654 Filed 6-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
# C_2015056EN.01003101.xml

| 16.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/31

---

Order of the General Court of 9 December 2014 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-442/13) (1)

1

(2015/C 056/43)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.

1

---
No. 09-11538.

#### Robert W. Jackson, III, Petitioner v. Carl C. Danberg, Commissioner, Delaware Department of Correction, et al.

562 U.S. 961, 131 S. Ct. 458,

178 L. Ed. 2d 287,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8089.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 210.
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 18,
2004 accompanying the financial statements of Earth Sciences, Inc. which are
also incorporated by reference to the following Registration Statements:

Form                   Deemed/Declared Effective Date               File No.
----                   ------------------------------               --------
S-8                    June 10, 1997                                333-28851
S-8                    February 4, 1999                             333-71789
S-8                    September 10, 1999                           333-86885
S-8                    December 10, 1999                            333-92567
S-8                    March 2, 2000                                333-31454
S-8                    April 26, 2000                               333-35614
S-8                    November 15, 2000                            333-50014
S-8                    March 12, 2001                               333-56876
S-8                    July 20, 2001                                333-65480
S-8                    November 14, 2001                            333-73292
S-8                    May 17, 2002                                 333-88520
S-8                    November 15, 2002                            333-101217
S-8                    April 22, 2003                               333-104684
S-3                    July 23, 1997                                333-25465
S-3                    September 22, 1997                           333-35135
S-3                    February 25, 1998                            333-46199
S-3                    February 25, 1998                            333-62173
S-3                    September 24, 1999                           333-76081
S-3                    February 2, 2000                             333-93075


of Earth Sciences, Inc. and to the use of our name and the statements with
respect to us, as appearing under the heading "Exhibits" in such Registration
Statements.

/s/ Hein & Associates LLP
-------------------------
HEIN & ASSOCIATES

Denver, Colorado
April 5, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-30643

Summary Calendar

_____________________

JOHNNY CHATMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CV-1715)

_________________________________________________________________

March 3, 1999

Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In contesting the denial of supplemental and dis ability

income, Johnny Chatman maintains that the Administrative Law Judge

did not compare his residual capacity with the physical and mental

demands of his past relevant work and did not make specific

findings regarding his residual functional capacity; challenges the

ALJ’s determination that his testimony regarding his ability to

return to such past work was not credible; asserts that the ALJ’s

determination was not s upported by substantial evidence; and

contends that the ALJ erred by failing to act on his request for a

consultative psychological examination at government expense.Chatman failed to exhaust his administrative remedies

regarding the psychological e xamination because he did not raise

his contention before the Appeals Council in his request for review

of the ALJ’s decision; therefore, we lack jurisdiction to review

that issue. E .g., Paul v. Shalala, 29 F. 3d 208, 210 (5th Cir.

1994); see also 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.900(b), 416.1400(b).

For the remaining issues, we cannot disturb the Commissioner’s

determinations unless substantial evidence does not e xist in the

record to support them, o r an error of law was made. L eggett v.

Chater , 67 F.3d 558, 564 (5th Cir. 1995). Pursuant to our review

of the record, we find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED
# TACOM life cycle group visits DLA Distribution 

/ Published May 28, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 

To give customers a firsthand view of their items inDLA’s care, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution hosted a visit from members ofTACOM’s Integrated Logistics Support CenterMay 27.  

The group kicked off its visit with a command overview togain a better understanding of how DLA Distribution’s supply pipeline providesglobal distribution support through its 24 distribution centers. The brief also explained how through the organization’s standardprocesses and performance metrics ensure efficient and effective support to itscustomers.  

Following the brief, the visitors toured DLA DistributionSusquehanna’s central warehouse, where they witnessed the magnitude and scope ofthe mission at DLA’s largest distribution center. They also toured thedistribution center’s Aerial Delivery operation where employees store a widevariety of parachutes, elastic cord, and repair parts.  Thisportion of this visit was of particular interest to the group, which primarilymanages aerial delivery equipment.

ILSC is responsible forthe entire life cycle support of the Army’s aircraft armament, small arms, fieldartillery, mortars, tools and training systems, tactical vehicles, light andheavy combat vehicles, watercraft, soldier/biological/chemical systems anddeployment/support equipment.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16711]



[[Page 34374]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-53-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Filing of Refund 
Report

June 18, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 15, 1998, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing a refund report detailing 
the pro rata refund to its eligible firm customers of a June 10, 1998. 
Gas Research Institute (GRI) refund of $65,084.00.
    Texas Gas states that this refund report is being made to comply 
with Commission Order issued February 22, 1995, in Docket No. RP95-124-
000 requiring each pipeline to file a refund report with the Commission 
within fifteen (15) days of making the refunds.
    Texas Gas states that copies of the refund report were included 
with the refunds made on June 10, 1998, and served upon Texas Gas's 
jurisdictional customers receiving refunds, and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before June 25, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16711 Filed 6-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2014194EN.01003804.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/38

---

Order of the General Court of 11 April 2014 — Serco Belgium and Others v Commission

(Case T-644/13) (1)

1

2014/C 194/54

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03558
THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
#### People v Gordon

3d Dept: 139 AD3d 1265 (Warren)

denied 8/24/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
# NPM event focuses on workplace preparedness

/ Published Sept. 15, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

It is important to be prepared for an emergency because you never know when a disaster will strike, an emergency management officer said at Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support’s annual National Preparedness Month event Sept. 8.

“You never know where you will be when an earthquake or chemical attack will happen,” Sam Phillips, the emergency management officer for Naval Support Activity Philadelphia and Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, said. “You need to be prepared both at home and at work.”

DLA Troop Support employees, as well as employees from other tenant organizations on the NSA Philadelphia compound, heard tips on how to prepare for an emergency that could occur on the base.

“One hazard that may happen on a government installation is an act of terrorism,” Phillips told the audience. “One way to respond is to shelter-in-place, find somewhere safe that you and your coworkers could go and make sure you have everything you need to protect yourself.”

Phillips also showed a video that explained how to shelter-in-place at work. In it, he described what workplace locations work best and the items needed to have in a shelter-in-place kit in the office.

When choosing a shelter room, a bathroom works well, Phillips said in the video. A bathroom provides running water and a toilet if you are there for a while.

“You need a room with few or no windows, and few doors,” he added. “Make sure it is large enough to hold your people. A rule of thumb is 10 square feet per person will provide enough oxygen for up to five hours.”

A sample of items to have in an office kit include:
        -  Plastic sheeting to cover windows and doors 
        -  Duct tape 
        -  Scissors 
        -  Smart phone or cell phone 
        -  Rubber gloves 
        -  AM/FM radio 

Susan Segal, a tailored vendor logistics specialist in the Medical supply chain, said the event was informative.

“I learned that my bathroom is my safe place because it has one window, one vent and one door, and is easy to seal,” Segal said. “I will definitely gather the things that I am missing (in a kit) and be better prepared in the event of an emergency.”

Phillips encouraged all employees to take advantage of the base wide-area alert network, AtHoc, to be immediately informed of any situations that occur on NSA Philadelphia. 

The event also included representatives from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency, the Salvation Army Emergency Disaster Services and the Red Paw Emergency Relief Team, who provided resources on how they can assist in preparedness and disaster response.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:28 AM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

Hi Bob,

Attached is the handout from this meeting.

Regards, Cortney

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_25_GHGExisitng_RePower_Handout.pdf >>

-----Original Appointment-----

From: Echols, Mabel E. Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guide lines for Existing Power Plants: Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

When: Friday, April 25, 2014 4:00 PM-4:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building

This meeting was requested by Eli Hopson, Latham & Watkins on behalf of RePower South.
##### 



Exhibit 32.3 EAGLEPICHER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of EaglePicher Technologies, LLC, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig N. Kitchen, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ CRAIG N. KITCHEN
    
    Date: March 14, 2005Craig
N. Kitchen, President
and Chief Executive Officer
#### People v McMichael

1st Dept: 149 AD3d 670

denied*
From: Kurland, Susan (OST)

To: "agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com" ; "Russell.Bailey@alpa.org" ; "2dandhac@centurytel.net" ; "CBethke@airlines.org" ; "Daniel.Shurz@flyfrontier.com" ; "dkirstein@yklaw.com" ; "DPeterson@aci-na.org" ; "efaberman@wrf.com" ; "Eugene.Alford@trade.gov" ; "John.Varley@virginamerica.com" ; "Karen.erazo@suncountry.com" ; "keith@washingtonairports.com" ; "pdoell@naca.cc" ; "pjackson@SWAPA.org" ; "cohen@raa.org" ; "rozhawk@verizon.net" ; "David.Semanchik@alpa.org" ; "salterman@cargoair.org"

Cc: Belford, Brandon (OST) ; Gretch, Paul (OST) ; "CristinaSA@State.gov" Subject: US-EU meeting in Brussels on Monday

Date: Thursday, July 10, 2014 4:16:05 PM



# We are writing to let you know that we have scheduled a U.S.-EU government-togovernment meeting next Monday, July 14, in Brussels. Representatives from both the Transportation and State Departments will attend.

The Department of Transportation has requested this meeting at the behest of Secretary Foxx to hear the EU’s views on the legal meaning and applicability of Article 17 bis of our Air Transport Agreement as it applies to carriers seeking either U.S. or EU authorizations under
the ATA. The Department of Transportation intends to summarize the contents of the meeting, place that summary in the docket of the pending proceeding dealing with Norwegian Air International’s (NAI) application for economic authority to conduct commercial operations to and from the U.S., and open that summary for comments and replies from any interested party.

Sincerely,

Susan L. Kurland Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs
No. 10-6944.

No. 10-6974.

#### Ali Awad, Petitioner v. United States. Abdi Emil Moge, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1054, 131 S. Ct. 613,

178 L. Ed. 2d 453,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8877.

November 15, 2010.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

*454Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Same cases below, 598 F.3d 76 and 369 Fed. Appx. 242.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00563

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF G.V.S., ET AL CHILDREN

,

F r o m the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Te xas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 01818

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from a trial court’s order terminating appellant father’s

parental rights. Appellant father’s brief was due September 24, 2018. On the due date, appellant

father filed a motion for extension of time asking for an additional twenty days in which to file

his brief. After review, we GRANT appellant father’s motion and ORDER appell ant father to

file his brief in this court on or before October 15, 2018.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of S eptember, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Cle rk of Court
_____________

No. 95-3223SD

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of South Dakota.

Kermit Fred Murschel, also *

known as Kermit F. Maurchel, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

Submitted: March 14, 1996

 Filed: April 10, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, JOHN R. GIBSON, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Kermit Fred Murschel appeals his bankruptcy fraud convictions.

Murschel raises several contentions related to the government's failure to

prove he was the person who made the false statements and filed the false

schedules, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury's

convictions, and the admissibility of evidence offered by Murschel. A

review of the record shows that Murschel's contentions are without merit.

Because the appeal involves the straightforward application of settled

principles of law, a discussion of the issues will serve no useful purpose.

Thus, we affirm Murschel's convictions without an extended opinion. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6632

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIE JAMES PARKS, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Richard C. Erwin,

Senior District Judge. (CR-91-76, CA-96-660-6)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 24, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie James Parks, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Parks, Nos. CR-91-76; CA-96-660-6 (M.D.N.C.

Apr. 22, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00178

- CV

IN RE WALTER ROY RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The co urt has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of

the opinion that relief should be den ied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GARDNER and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 30, 2013

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).
#### People v Fana

1st Dept: 140 AD3d 534 (NY)

denied 8/24/16 (Pigott, J.)
No. D-2560.

#### In the Matter of Joseph Wayne Dean.

562 U.S. 1000, 131 S. Ct. 556,

178 L. Ed. 2d 411,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8445.

November 1, 2010.

Joseph Wayne Dean, of Raleigh, North Carolina, having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys permitted to the practice of law before this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, issued on October 4, 2010, is discharged.
# C_2015381EN.01005801.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/58

---

Order of the General Court of 28 August 2015 — Bimbo v OHIM — Kimbo (Caffè KIMBO GOLD MEDAL)

(Case T-638/13) (1)

1

(2015/C 381/70)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.

1

---