alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2645 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2645

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the care provided by 
         the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to newborn children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2019

Mrs. Lee of Nevada (for herself, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mrs. Walorski, 
and Ms. Houlahan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the care provided by 
         the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to newborn children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Newborn Care Improvement Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES PROVIDED TO NEWBORN 
              CHILDREN BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 1786 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by striking ``seven days'' and inserting ``14 days''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Annual Report.--Not later than 31 days after the end of each 
fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Veterans' 
Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the 
House of Representatives a report on the health care services provided 
under subsection (a) during such fiscal year, including the number of 
newborn children who received such services during such fiscal year.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001064414
<NAME>                        PECO ENERGY TRANSITION TRUST
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         87
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              221
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              4,128<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         202<F2>
<BONDS>                                     3,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                4,034
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              274
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               70
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   74
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
<FN>
<F1>
(1)  Includes Intangible Transition Property of $4,018.
<F2>
(2)  Due to Related Party, Net of $58, Current Portion of Long-term Debt of $120
     and Accrued Expenses of $23.
</FN>


</TABLE>
No. 10-5659.

#### In re Victor Del Rio, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 960, 131 S. Ct. 460,

178 L. Ed. 2d 317,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7884.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
#### People v Dame

4th Dept: 144 AD3d 1625 (Onondaga)

denied 3/3/17 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
No. 10-5554.

#### Luis Roberto Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 928, 131 S. Ct. 317,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7323.

178 L. Ed. 2d 207,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 403.
No. 10-5855.

#### Marie P., Petitioner v. Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services.

562 U.S. 968, 131 S. Ct. 472,

178 L. Ed. 2d 300,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8113.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.
Exhibit 23.1   **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We haveissued our report dated March 16, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the application of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 123(R) in 2006), accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule andour report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in theAnnual Report of Dynamics Research Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statementsof Dynamics Research Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-109973, effective October, 24, 2003,File No. 333-59706, effective April 27, 2001, File No. 333-47838, effective October 12, 2000, FileNo. 333-02805, effective April 24, 1996 and File No. 333-68548, effective September 9, 1993)./s/ Grant Thornton LLPBoston, MA
No. 10-6325.

#### Rodger Einstein Hayward, Petitioner v. Salvador Godinez, Executive Director, Cook County Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 1013, 131 S. Ct. 530,

178 L. Ed. 2d 389,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8646.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*390Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 642.
***Exhibit 32.1***

**Section 1350 Certification,**

**As Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magma Design Automation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 1, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Rajeev Madhavan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Distribution police officers honor National Police Week with ceremony

/ Published May 19, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Police Force hosted a wreath laying ceremony to pay tribute to local, state, and Federal peace officers who have died in the line of duty on May 18, in the base chapel. Each year, our nation loses between 140-160 law enforcement officers in the line of duty.

Distribution police chief Douglas Schraeder thanked everyone who gathered to show their respect for the men and women who have died in the line of duty nationwide.

“Today we gather to pay respect to those whose names are permanently carved into the marble walls of the National Law Enforcement Memorial,” said Schraeder.

Guest speaker, Thomas Grohol, director of the Bureau of Law Enforcement for the Pennsylvania Game Commission explained his pride in being one of the messengers to honor those who “gave the ultimate sacrifice.”

“This day is for all of us who make up the law enforcement family,” said Grohol. “Law enforcement officers play an important part of daily life. They are America’s ambassadors of freedom.”

Grohol explained that on average, 1 peace officer is killed every 61 hours. Typically, the leading cause of death is from violent attacks or vehicle accidents. This year 252 names will be added to the memorial. 123 of those names are people who were killed in 2015, the remaining 129 are those who were killed in previous years, but their stories had not yet been told.

Following his presentation, Grohol and Schraeder placed the memorial wreath at the front of the room. Everyone in attendance was then offered the opportunity to place a pink carnation in front of the wreath in honor of the fallen officers.

The ceremony concluded with the playing of “*Taps*” by Jay Megonnell and the benediction by Reverend Arun Andrews of Trinity United Methodist Church in New Cumberland, Pa. Additionally, everyone remained standing for the playing of “*Amazing Grace*.”

Across the United States, communities have been honoring police officers, and the sacrifices they make for the safety of our country since 1962, the year President John F. Kennedy signed a proclamation which designated May 15 as Peace Officers Memorial Day and the week in which is falls as National Police Week.

Each year since 1982, thousands of police officers come together in Washington, D.C., to participate in planned events honoring those that made the ultimate sacrifice while serving their communities. National Police Week 2016 began May 15 and concludes May 21.

According to The Officer Down Memorial Page, an independent website, the nationwide statics for fallen officers in 2016 are 35 officers and 12 K9’s killed in the line of duty.

For more information about events open to the public, visit www.policeweek.org.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Johnson, Appellant.

[59 NYS3d 389]—

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), rendered October 31, 2014, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to a determinate term of imprisonment of 10 years, to be followed by 5 years of postrelease supervision, upon his conviction of burglary in the second degree, to run concurrently with concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of IV2 to 3 years upon each of his convictions of grand larceny in the fourth degree.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed on the conviction of burglary in the second degree from a determinate term of imprisonment of 10 years, to be followed by 5 years of postrelease supervision, to a determinate term oif imprisonment of 7 years, to be followed by 5 years of post-release supervision; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. !

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effec*621tive assistance of counsel is without merit. “[W]hen reviewing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, care must be taken to avoid confusing true ineffectiveness with mere losing tactics. The performance of counsel must be viewed without the benefit of hindsight and if counsel provided meaningful representation in the context of the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the particular case, the constitutional requirement will have been met” *(People v Ramirez,*146 AD3d 987, 987 [2017] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796, 798-799 [1985]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). “[I]t is incumbent on defendant to demonstrate the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel’s alleged shortcomings . . . . As long as the defense reflects a reasonable and legitimate strategy under the circumstances and evidence presented, even if unsuccessful, it will not fall to the level of ineffective assistance” *(People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712-713 [1998] [citations and internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, defense counsel pursued a reasonable strategy that included the defendant’s testimony as to his own version of events. The defendant failed to demonstrate the lack of strategic or other legitimate explanations for defense counsel’s alleged shortcomings *(see People v Taylor,*1 NY3d 174, 177-178 [2003]). Under the circumstances, the defendant was afforded meaningful representation.

The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated herein *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Mastro, J.P., Hall, Austin and Barros, JJ., concur.
# Building 20 Lactation Room supports nursing mothers

/ Published July 26, 2022
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime’s Safety and Occupational Health Division maintains a Lactation Program for DLA Columbus personnel ensuring access to a lactation room.

The lactation room is in Room A138 located on the first floor of Building 20. The room has three private stalls, each with a slide lock, comfortable chair, outlet and countertop. There is a microwave and refrigerator in the common area for storage of expressed milk. The room itself has a door requiring a key for entry to ensure privacy. The nurse in the nearby Nurse's Station maintains the access key and a sign-in log. Anyone with access to Building 20 can see the nurse to receive a key.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requires that employers provide a place for an employee to express breast milk, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from coworkers and the public. For more information on the Workplace Lactation Program, contact DSCC.Safety.Health@dla.mil.
Exhibit 15.5

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements of Elbit Systems Ltd. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-9354 and 333-139512) of our report dated January 15, 2008, with respect to the balance sheet of Microwave Networks Solutions, Inc. as of
December 31, 2007 and the related statements of operations and retained earnings and cash flows for each of the two years in the two year period ended December 31, 2007, which report is included in this Annual Report of Elbit Systems Ltd.
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|    |  |                                                      
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Hoberman, Miller, Goldstein & Lesser, CPAs, P.C.
|    |  | Hoberman, Miller, Goldstein & Lesser, CPAs, P.C.    

New York, New York

March 12, 2009
#### Fabtastic Abode, LLC, Respondent, v Constantine Arcella, as Executor of John F. Arcella, Deceased, Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 318]

In an action, inter alia, in effect, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has unencumbered title to real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated *669August 21, 2015, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

On November 14, 1985, John F. Arcella, the defendant’s decedent (hereinafter the decedent), conveyed the subject real property to the plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest. The purchase was financed by a purchase-money mortgage and note executed by the plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest, which required the payment of installments through November 14, 2005. In 1989, the plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest defaulted in making the required payments, and the decedent commenced an action to foreclose the mortgage (hereinafter the foreclosure action). No judgment of foreclosure and sale was entered in the foreclosure action. However, in an order dated December 4, 1998, the Supreme Court authorized the decedent to “enter upon, take possession of and manage the premises herein in accordance with the terms of the mortgage.” A provision of the mortgage assigned “the rents, issues and profits of the premises” to the mortgagee as further security for the debt until the mortgage was paid.

In January 2012, the plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the mortgage was paid in full and, in effect, declaring that the plaintiff has unencumbered title to the property. The defendant served an answer asserting an affirmative defense that the action was time-barred. Thereafter, the defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, arguing, among other things, that the action was time-barred. In an order dated August 21, 2015, the Supreme Court, inter alia, denied the defendant’s motion. The defendant appeals.

The Supreme Court properly determined that this action is one to quiet title and that, under CPLR 212 (a), read together with RPAPL 311, the action was timely *(see Elam v Altered Ego Realty Holding Corp.,*114 AD3d 901, 903 [2014]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, this action is not barred by RPAPL 1501 (4), since it is not one to discharge the mortgage on the ground that an action to enforce the mortgage is time-barred *(cf. 63-65 Corp. v Prevosti,*28 AD3d 469 [2006]). Moreover, CPLR 212 (c), which governs the timeliness of actions to redeem a mortgage, is inapplicable since the instant action is not one to “redeem” a mortgage by “making payment of the debt owed to the mortgagee” *(D & L Holdings v Goldman*Co., 287 AD2d 65, 69 [2001]).

The parties’ remaining contentions either are without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination.

*670Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Cohen and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.3**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Harry Roessner, Vice President of Accounting and Controller of SunCom Wireless, Inc., certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SunCom Wireless, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III. E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293] for the registrant and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [omitted in accordance with Section III. E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293]; 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 13, 2006
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATE

I, Marvin T. Green III, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of KMG Chemicals, Inc.; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: November 14, 2018 |   | /s/ Marvin T. Green III |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   | Marvin T. Green III     |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer |
# Installation environmental office offers tips on landscaping for wildlife

/ Published April 15, 2021
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Spring has sprung in Ohio and many of us are spending more time at home.  Naturally, this is a great time for lawn and garden improvements.  If you’re in the market for some new bushes or trees, why not also attract more birds and butterflies?  Any tree or shrub will provide so much more habitat than a lawn alone but consider taking it a step further and choosing a native variety.  

Central Ohio has clay soil, cold winters, dry summers and swampy springs.  Not many plants can handle this region with grace, but native plants are up to the task.  For more information on why native plants are important, please see Bringing your landscape to life!  

Below is a quick list of beautiful and hardy shrubs and trees that I’ve found since my original article. Please see Native Plant Suggestions for additional options.

Native Bushes and Trees:

Shrubs:
      - Clethra - attracts hummingbirds AND butterflies!
      - Dogwood (Red Twig, Pagoda, Gray) – high wildlife value!
      - Viburnum (Nannyberry, American Highbush, Maple Leaf, Arrowwood, Black Haw) 
      - Ninebark
      - Winterberry Holly
      - Northern Bayberry - evergreen shrub!
      - Buttonbush - attracts hummingbirds AND butterflies!   

Trees:
      - *Wild Cherry
      - *Sweetbay Magnolia   
      - *Paw Paw
      - *Oak (red, black, scarlet, pin, white, willow, swamp, chestnut)
      - American Holly – evergreen!

**indicates a butterfly host plant*