alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.5




                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                         TO THE DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC.
                     CONSOLIDATED SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN,
                  AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 1994


     The Dresser Industries, Inc. Consolidated Salaried Retirement Plan, (May 1,
1994 restatement), is amended, effective as of May 31, 1995, by adding the
following new paragraph to the end of the Preamble:

          This Plan is frozen effective as of May 31, 1995.  The Accrued
     Benefit of any Participant is limited to the Accrued Benefit earned as
     of May 31, 1995.  Without limiting the generality of the preceding two
     sentences, this means, among other things, that increases in
     remuneration after May 31, 1995 will not be recognized in computing
     benefits under the Plan, and that Credited Service will not be earned
     for any peroids of employment after May 31, 1995.  In addition, no one
     may become a Participant after May 31, 1995.  This paragraph freezing
     the Plan supersedes and overrides any and all Plan provisions to the
     contrary.

<PAGE>

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                         TO THE DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC.
                     CONSOLIDATED SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN,
                  AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 1994


The Dresser Industries, Inc. Consolidated Salaried Retirement Plan, as amended
and restated effective May 1, 1994, is further amended, effective May 31, 1995,
by adding the following to the end of Section 4.04:

     Effective on May 31, 1995, benefit accruals under the Plan ceased.
Notwithstanding this general cessation of benefit accruals, a Participant who
was Totally Disabled as of May 31, 1995, and, as of such date, was accruing a
benefit under the Plan in accordance with this Section 4.04, shall continue to
accrue benefits hereunder until the earlier of:  (i) the date benefit accruals
ordinarily would have ceased under the provisions of Section 4.04, or (ii)
December 31, 1996.

     As of any date occurring after May 31, 1995, the Accrued Benefit of a
Totally Disabled Participant shall be equal to the sum of:

(a)  the Participant's Accrued Benefit as of May 31, 1995; and

(b)  an amount determined under the following formula:

                             { (PB-AB) / PCS } x VCS

     where:

     PB equals the calculation (as if made on May 31, 1995) of the Participant's
     Accrued Benefit, projected to Age 65;

     AB equals the calculation (as if made on May 31, 1995) of the Participant's
     Accrued Benefit through May 31, 1995 only (i.e., not projected to Age 65);

     PCS equals the calculation (as if made on May 31, 1995) of the
     Participant's projected Credited Service between May 31, 1995 and
     Age 65; and

     VCS equals the calculation of the Participant's Credited Service between
     May 31, 1995 and the earlier of (i) the date determination under this
     formula is being made or (ii) December 31, 1996.
# Red River’s Merrell celebrates 50 years of federal service

/ Published Aug. 17, 2016
RED RIVER, Texas, 
Shirley Merrell, a supply system analyst with DLA Distribution Red River, Texas, recently celebrated her 50th year of federal service. 

Merrell, who began her federal career out of high school, joined DLA when the organization took over the supply function at Red River Army Depot.

Beginning her career as a wage grade employee, Merrell moved throughout many different supply positions with installation host Red River Army Depot.  Upon joining DLA in 1991, Merrell held the position of lead supply technician until transitioning to her current duties as supply systems analyst in August 2009.

In a ceremony on June 10, DLA Distribution Red River commander, Army Lt. Col. Anthony A. Stoeger presented Merrell with her 50-year service award.

“I thought 20 years of military service was impressive until I gave an award to Shirley A. Merrell for 50 years of government service today,” said Stoeger. “As part of my expeditionary team, the number of warfighters Shirley has supported over the years is simply amazing. She is an inspiration to us all.”

Merrell credits her time on the DLA Distribution expeditionary team as an experience for which she is thankful.  “I’ve had the opportunity to travel to places I probably would not have gone to on my own, both within the United States as well as abroad.”  

Overall, Merrell says she is very thankful for her career with the federal government.  “I am very fortunate to have worked for the Army and DLA.  The experience has allowed me to raise a family, and surround myself with hard workers, dedicated to serving the warfighter.”
No. 09-1540.

#### Joseph Carione, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

562 U.S. 839, 131 S. Ct. 195,

178 L. Ed. 2d 43,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5809.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

*44Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 310.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15413]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the forthcoming regular meeting 
of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATES AND TIME: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on June 
11, 1998, from 1:00 p.m. until such time as the Board concludes its 
business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Floyd Fithian, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts of this meeting 
will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to 
Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements 
in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes
B. Report
    --Farm Credit System Building Association Quarterly Report
C. New Business
Regulation
    --Other Financing Institutions [12 CFR Part 614] (Final Rule)

*Closed Session

D. Reports
    1. OSMO Report
    2. OGC Litigation Report

    *Session Closed--Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8), (9) and 
(10).

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15413 Filed 6-5-98; 11:30 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7147

CHRISTOPHER T. JAMES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RICK JACKSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior

District Judge. (3:06-cv-00220)

Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 23, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher T. James, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Christopher T. James appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on both his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and

subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s orders. See James v. North Carolina,

3:06-cv-00220 (W.D.N.C. May 17, 2006 & June 19, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136413 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

RICHARD G. ALEXANDER, and

CAROL ALEXANDER, 

Plaintiffs/Counter

Defendants/Appellants, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136413 

 COA: 273433 

Oakland CC: 2004-061478-CZ 

EBRAHIM BABAOFF, and 

AZAM BABAOFF,

 Defendants/Counter

Plaintiffs/Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 31, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
No. 10-229.

#### Susan M. Fox, Petitioner v. Traverse City Area Public Schools Board of Education, et al.

562 U.S. 1062, 131 S. Ct. 643,

178 L. Ed. 2d 478,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9321.

November 29, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 605 F.3d 345.
2011 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

6-9-2011 

# U S A v . S t eve n T a n zol a

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 09-4477

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2011

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2011 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U SA v . S t e v e n T a nz o l a " (2011). 2011 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 1129. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2011/1129

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________
No. 09

- 4477

_____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.
STEVEN C. TANZOLA,

Appellant.

_______________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

(D.C. Crim. Action No. 08

- 00724) District Judge: Honorable Berle M. Schiller

_______________ Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

December 16, 2010

_______________
ORDER

_______________ The opinion filed on Ma rch 7 , 2011 shall be amended as follows : at page 4, where (2) “ allow the parties to argue their positions relative to what they believe is an appropriate sentence ;” shall be replaced with (2) “ they must formally rule on the motions of both parties and state on the record whether they are granting a departure and how that departure affects the Guidelines calculation, and take into account the court’s pre

- Booker case law, which continues to have advisory force .” This does not affect the Judgment issued by the Court on Ma rch 7 , 2011. An amended opinion will be filed; however the original filing date will not be altered.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Circuit Judge Dated: June 9, 2011
# C_2015146EN.01004301.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/43

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 March 2015 — AX v ECB

(Case F-73/13) (1)

1

((Civil service - ECB staff - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary measure - Dismissal - Rights of the defence - Access to the disciplinary file - Access to information and documents on other divisions - Reasonable time - Lawfulness of the composition of the Disciplinary Committee - Advisory role of the Disciplinary Committee - Stricter disciplinary measure than that recommended - Obligation to state reasons - Management of a division - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality of the disciplinary measure - Extenuating circumstances - Aggravating circumstances - Objection of illegality))

(2015/C 146/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AX (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: M. López Torres and E. Carlini, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision to dismiss the applicant following disciplinary proceedings instigated for serious misconduct and for compensation in respect of the non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Declares that AX is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European Central Bank. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Declares that AX is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European Central Bank.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013, p. 33.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Rodriguez, Appellant.

[65 NYS3d 446]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Larry Stephen, J. at plea; Laura Ward, J. at sentencing), rendered December 15, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Gische, J.P., Web-ber, Oing, Singh and Moulton, JJ.
# C_2014112EN.01003401.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/34

---

Order of the General Court of 7 February 2014 — Pesquerias Riveirenses and Others v Council

(Case T-180/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Fisheries policy - Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 - Amalgamation of the northern and southern components of the stock of blue whiting in the north-east Atlantic in order to establish the TAC - Lack of direct concern - Manifestly inadmissible))

2014/C 112/45

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Pesquerias Riveirenses, SL (Ribeira, Spain); Pesquerias Campo de Marte, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Anpajo, SL (Ribeira); Arrastreros del Barbanza, SA (Ribeira); Martínez Pardavila e Hijos, SL (Ribeira); Lijo Pesca, SL (Ribeira); Frigoríficos Hermanos Vidal, SA (Ribeira); Pesquera Boteira, SL (Ribeira); Francisco Mariño Mos y Otros, CB (Ribeira); Pérez Vidal Juan Antonio y Hno, CB (Ribeira); Marina Nalda, SL (Ribeira); Portillo y Otros, SL (Ribeira); Vidiña Pesca, SL (Ribeira); Pesca Hermo, SL (Ribeira); Pescados Oubiña Pérez, SL (Ribeira); Manuel Pena Graña (Ribeira); Campo Eder, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Laga, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Jalisco, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Jopitos, SL (Ribeira); y Pesca-Julimar, SL (Ribeira) (represented by: J. Tojeiro Sierto, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Westerhof Löfflerová and A. de Gregorio Merino, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

ACTION for annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and, to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international negotiations or agreements (OJ 2013 L 23, p. 54), as amended, in so far as it amalgamates the northern and southern components of the stock of blue whiting in the north-east Atlantic in order to establish the TAC (total allowable catch) for blue whiting set out in Annexes IA and IB of that regulation.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | The applicants, Pesquerias Riveirenses, SL, and others, are ordered to bear their own costs as well as those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicants, Pesquerias Riveirenses, SL, and others, are ordered to bear their own costs as well as those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.

1

---
No. 10-7012.

#### Stephen M. Levy, aka Reallybad@aol.com, aka Steve Levy, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1051, 131 S. Ct. 617,

178 L. Ed. 2d 448,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9004.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 20.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2286

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for the use of certain

highway funds for improvements to railway-highway crossings.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14 (legislative day, JULY 11), 1994

Mr. LUGAR (for himself and Mr. COATS) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for the

use of certain highway funds for improvements to railway-highway crossings.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rail Grade Crossing

5 Safety Enhancement Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RAILWAY-HIGHWAY

7 CROSSING IMPROVEMENT.

8 Section 153(h) of title 23, United States Code, is

9 amended by adding at the end the following:
2

•S 2286 IS

1 ‘‘(6) AUTHORITY FOR ALTERNATIVE APPOR2 TIONMENT.—

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In lieu of a transfer of

4 a percentage of funds to the apportionment of

5 a State in a fiscal year under paragraph (1) or

6 (2), the Secretary may transfer all or a portion

7 of the percentage of funds applicable under

8 such paragraph in that fiscal year to the appor9 tionment of the State under section 130 of this

10 title.

11 ‘‘(B) CONDITION OF TRANSFER.—The Sec12 retary shall exercise the authority provided

13 under subparagraph (A) in a fiscal year only

14 upon the request of the chief executive officer

15 of the State concerned.

16 ‘‘(C) USE OF TRANSFERRED FUNDS.—

17 Funds available to a State pursuant to a trans18 fer of funds under this paragraph shall be used

19 for the purpose set forth in the first sentence

20 of section 130(e) of this title.

21 ‘‘(D) TREATMENT OF EXERCISE OF AU22 THORITY.—Paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) shall

23 apply to a transfer under this paragraph. In the

24 administration of such paragraphs with respect

25 to such a transfer, the reference to section 402
3

•S 2286 IS

1 of this title shall be deemed to be a reference

2 to section 130 of this title.’’.

Æ
No. 10-7086.

#### Ronnie Blade, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1053, 131 S. Ct. 622,

178 L. Ed. 2d 451,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9005,

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Lexon Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kenneth J. Eaken, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: June 17, 2004         /S/Kenneth J. Eaken
                            Principal Executive Officer
                            Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.