Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 11751 

variances. Rescinded in 2008; see 

paragraph (c)(156) of this section. 

* * * * * 

(98) * * * 

(i) Incorporation by reference. Rule 

3745–35–07, adopted November 3, 

1994, effective November 18, 1994. 

Rescinded in 2008; see paragraph 

(c)(156) of this section. 

* * * * * 

(119) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(A) Ohio Administrative Code 3745– 

35–02, adopted April 4, 1994, effective 

April 20, 1994. Rescinded in 2008; see 

paragraph (c)(156) of this section. 

* * * * * 

(156) On April 24, 2006, Ohio EPA 

submitted two permanent exemptions 

from the Permit to Install program and 

six Permit-by-Rule provisions for 

approval into its SIP. On July 18, 2008, 

Ohio EPA submitted provisions for a 

Permit to Install and Operate (PTIO) 

program and a general permit program 

for approval into its SIP. The changes to 

Ohio’s SIP involve the modification of 

various parts of OAC 3745–31, the 

removal of OAC 3745–35, and the 

addition of OAC 3745–31–29 to enable 

the issuance of federally enforceable 

general PTIs and general PTIOs. On June 

30, 2008, the state regulations to 

implement the PTIO program became 

effective and OAC 3745–35 was 

rescinded. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. 

(A) Paragraph (A) of Ohio 

Administrative Code Rule 3745–15–03, 

‘‘Submission of emission information.’’, 

effective June 30, 2008. 

(B) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–01, ‘‘Definitions.’’, effective 

December 14, 2007, except for 

paragraphs (I), (LLL)(2)(a)(ix), 

(LLL)(2)(a)(xxi), (LLL)(4)(t), and 

(QQQ)(1)(b). 

(C) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–02, ‘‘Applicability, 

requirements, and obligations.’’, 

effective June 30, 2008. 

(D) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–03, ‘‘Exemptions.’’, effective 

June 30, 2008. 

(E) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–04, ‘‘Applications.’’, effective 

June 30, 2008. 

(F) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–05, ‘‘Criteria for decision by 

the director.’’, effective June 30, 2008, 

except for paragraph (A)(3)(a)(ii). 

(G) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–06, ‘‘Completeness 

determinations, processing 

requirements, public participation, 

public notice, and issuance.’’, effective 

June 30, 2008, except for paragraph 

(H)(2)(d). 

(H) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–07, ‘‘Termination, revocation, 

expiration, renewal, revision and 

transfer.’’, effective June 30, 2008. 

(I) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–08, ‘‘Registration status 

permit-to-operate.’’, effective June 30, 

2008. 

(J) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–09, ‘‘Variances on operation.’’, 

effective June 30, 2008. 

(K) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–10, ‘‘NSR projects at existing 

emissions units at a major stationary 

source.’’, effective June 30, 2008. 

(L) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–20, ‘‘Attainment provisions— 

innovative control technology.’’, 

effective June 30, 2008. 

(M) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–22, ‘‘Nonattainment 

provisions—conditions for approval.’’, 

effective June 30, 2008. 

(N) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–29, ‘‘General permit-to-install 

and general PTIO.’’, effective June 30, 

2008. 

(O) Ohio Administrative Code Rule 

3745–31–32, ‘‘Plantwide applicability 

limit (PAL).’’, effective June 30, 2008. 

(P) June 2, 2008, ‘‘Director’s Final 

Findings and Orders’’, signed by Chris 

Korleski, Director, Ohio EPA. 

[FR Doc. 2013–03761 Filed 2–19–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2012–0293; FRL–9781–5] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Kansas; Idle Reduction of Heavy-Duty 

Diesel Vehicles and Reduction of 

Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) Emissions for 

the Kansas City Ozone Maintenance 

Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve revisions to the 

Kansas State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

submitted by the State of Kansas on July 

27, 2010. The revision includes two new 

rules which implement restrictions on 

the idling of heavy duty diesel vehicles 

and reduce nitrogen oxide (NOX) 

emissions at stationary sources in the 

Kansas portion of the Kansas City 

Maintenance Area for ozone. EPA is 

approving this revision because the 

standards and requirements set by the 

rules will strengthen the Kansas SIP. 

EPA’s approval of this SIP revision is 

being done in accordance with the 

requirements of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA). 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective April 22, 2013, without further 

notice, unless EPA receives adverse 

comment by March 22, 2013. If EPA 

receives adverse comment, we will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2012–0293, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: kemp.lachala@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or hand delivery: Lachala 

Kemp, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2012– 

0293. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or email 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The http:// 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
11752 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Air Planning and Development Branch, 

11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, 

Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s 

official hours of business are Monday 

through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30 excluding 

Federal holidays. The interested persons 

wanting to examine these documents 

should make an appointment with the 

office at least 24 hours in advance. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lachala Kemp at (913) 551–7214 or by 

email at kemp.lachala@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. What is the background for today’s action? 

II. What revisions is EPA approving? 

III. Why is EPA approving Kansas’s SIP 

revision? 

IV. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

V. What action is EPA taking? 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is the background for today’s 

action? 

The Kansas City Eight-Hour Ozone 

Maintenance Plan, which was approved 

by EPA and became effective on October 

9, 2007, contains contingency measures 

that are triggered upon a violation of the 

1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air 

quality standard. These contingency 

measures include a heavy-duty diesel 

idle reduction regulation and a NOX

emissions reduction regulation for 

Johnson and Wyandotte counties. A 

violation of the 1997 8-hour ozone 

standard occurred thereafter, thus 

triggering the adoption of these rules. 

II. What revisions is EPA approving? 

On July 27, 2010, Kansas submitted to 

EPA for approval into the Kansas SIP 

two new rules for the Kansas portion of 

the Kansas City Ozone Maintenance 

Area: Kansas Administrative Regulation 

(K.A.R.) 28–19–712 and K.A.R. 28–19– 

713. These rules became effective in 

Kansas on June 25, 2010. The idle 

reduction rule at K.A.R. 28–19–712 

limits the amount of time a heavy duty 

diesel vehicle in Johnson and 

Wyandotte Counties in Kansas will be 

permitted to idle while parked or while 

waiting to load or unload. It also places 

responsibilities on freight load or 

unload locations to limit the idling of 

heavy duty diesel vehicles or 

commercial vehicles while at their 

location. 

Per K.A.R. 28–19–712a, this rule 

applies to owners or operators of 

commercial, public or institutional 

heavy duty diesel vehicles (those having 

a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 

greater than 14,001 pounds) that are 

designed primarily to transport persons 

or property on public streets and 

highways. 

K.A.R. 28–19–712b sets a time limit of 

five minutes idling time (i.e., when a 

vehicle’s engine is operating but not in 

gear) in any sixty minute period, with 

some exceptions noted in K.A.R. 28–19– 

712c and 28–19–712d, as described 

below. In addition, the regulations 

restrict idling of heavy-duty diesel 

vehicles that are also commercial 

vehicles to thirty minutes in any sixty 

minute period at load or unload 

locations. K.A.R. 28–19–712c. 

The regulation specifies exemptions 

to the idling limit for certain vehicle 

types and situations. These exemptions 

are listed in K.A.R. 28–19–712d and 

include: road traffic conditions; 

operating equipment for safety or 

emergency uses; police, fire, ambulance, 

public safety and other law enforcement 

vehicles; service and repair needs; state 

or Federal equipment inspections; 

mechanical work; armored vehicles; bus 

idling for passenger comfort (no greater 

than fifteen minutes in any sixty minute 

period); vehicles idling for purposes of 

using sleeper berth compartments; 

mechanical difficulties; agricultural 

operations in which the vehicle is only 

incidentally operated or moved upon 

public roads; and vehicles using 

auxiliary equipment powered by the 

engine. 

Kansas intends to use financial 

incentives, compliance assistance and 

public education as the primary tools to 

implement the heavy-duty diesel idling 

rule. It intends to reprioritize its existing 

contractual agreements with the locally 

affected governmental agencies to 

emphasize the need for public outreach, 

education and compliance assistance to 

facilitate this implementation. 

Furthermore, in appropriate cases, 

Kansas has statutory authority under 

K.S.A. 65–3018 to seek penalties. Based 

on this, EPA has determined that this 

rule meets the applicable criteria for 

enforceability of SIP requirements. 

The NOX emissions reduction rule at 

K.A.R. 28–17–713 will apply to owners 

and operators of stationary sources 

located in Johnson and Wyandotte 

counties that emit NOX in an amount 

equal to or greater than 1,000 tons per 

year for the entire facility, based on the 

average of total emissions for the 2005, 

2006 and 2007 calendar years (the threeyear period in which the violation of the 

ozone standard was recorded). No 

owner or operator of an emission unit 

subject to the rules may allow or permit 

NOX to be emitted in excess of specified 

emission limits. The Kansas regulations 

further require owners and operators to 

install, operate, and maintain such 

equipment as necessary to achieve the 

emission limits and to demonstrate 

compliance using a certified continuous 

emission monitoring system (CEMS). 

Three facilities are affected by this 

rule. Two of these are the Kansas City 

Board of Public Utilities (BPU) power 

generating facilities located in 

Wyandotte County—the Nearman Creek 

Power Station and the Quindaro Power 

Station. The other affected facility is 

AGC Flat Glass North America located 

in southern Johnson County. 

III. Why is EPA approving Kansas’s SIP 

revision? 

These rules will result in reduced 

emissions of pollutants that contribute 

to ozone and fine particulate matter 

concentrations. The pollutants reduced 

by these regulations are volatile organic 

compounds, nitrogen oxides, carbon 

monoxide, and fine particulate matter, 

although the amount of reductions is 

not quantified. The approval of this rule 

will strengthen the Kansas SIP and 

assist the state in meeting and 

maintaining compliance with air quality 

standards, including the standard for 

ground level ozone. 

Kansas’s idling rule is generally 

consistent with EPA’s ‘‘Model State 

Idling Law’’ (EPA420–S–06–001, April 

2006). This model rule was developed 

with input from the states and industry 

to address idling issues in a consistent 

and understandable manner from state 

to state, to aid in compliance. 

IV. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP revision been met? 

The state submittal has met the public 

notice requirements for SIP submissions 

in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The 

submittal also satisfied the 

completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, 

appendix V. In addition, the revision 

meets the substantive SIP requirements 

of the CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations. 

V. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is taking final action to approve 

the request to amend the Kansas SIP to 

include Kansas rules K.A.R. 28–19–712 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 11753 

(Idle Reduction of Heavy Duty Diesel 

Vehicles) and K.A.R. 28–19–713 

(Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) 

Emissions for the Kansas portion of the 

Kansas City Ozone Maintenance Area). 

These rules were adopted by Kansas 

in response to a violation of the 8-hour 

ozone standard in Kansas City, based on 

2005 through 2007 monitoring data, 

under the statutory authority granted by 

Kansas Statutes Annotated (K.S.A.) 65– 

3001 through 65–3028. The regulations 

were effective in Kansas on June 25, 

2010. 

We are processing this action as a 

direct final action because the revisions 

make routine changes to the existing 

rules which are noncontroversial. 

Therefore, we do not anticipate any 

adverse comments. Please note that if 

EPA receives adverse comments on part 

of this rule and if that part can be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those parts of 

the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by April 22, 2013. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Motor 

carriers, Motor vehicles, Motor vehicle 

pollution, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, 

Transportation, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: February 6, 2013. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et. seq. 

Subpart R—Kansas 

■ 2. In § 52.870 the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by adding new entries in 

alpha-numeric order for K.A.R. 28–19– 

712 and 28–19–713 under a new 

subheading entitled ‘‘Nitrogen Oxide 

Emissions’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.870 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED KANSAS REGULATIONS

Kansas citation Title State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

Kansas Department of Health and Environment 

Ambient Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
11754 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA-APPROVED KANSAS REGULATIONS—Continued 

Kansas citation Title State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Nitrogen Oxide Emissions 

K.A.R. 28–19–712 ........................... Definitions ...................................... 06/25/10 02–20–13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

........................

K.A.R. 28–19–712a ......................... Applicability .................................... 06/25/10 02–20–13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

02–20–13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins]. 

........................

K.A.R. 28–19–712b ......................... General requirement for heavyduty diesel vehicles.06/25/10 02–20–13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

........................

K.A.R. 28–19–712c ......................... General requirement for load and 

unload locations.

06/25/10 02–20–13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

........................

K.A.R. 28–19–712d ......................... Exemptions .................................... 06/25/10 02–20–13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

........................

K.A.R. 28–19–713 ........................... Applicability .................................... 06/25/10 02–20–13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

........................

K.A.R. 28–19–713a ......................... Emission limitation requirements ... 06/25/10 02–20–13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

........................

K.A.R. 28–19–713b ......................... Alternate emissions limit ................ 06/25/10 02–20–13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

........................

K.A.R. 28–19–713c ......................... Control measures and equipment 06/25/10 02–20–13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

........................

K.A.R. 28–19–713d ......................... Compliance demonstration, monitoring, and reporting requirements.06/25/10 02–20–13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

........................

*******

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–03749 Filed 2–19–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0762; FRL–9782–1] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Tennessee: 

Knox County Supplement Motor 

Vehicle Emissions Budget Update 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve a revision to the 

Tennessee State Implementation Plan 

(SIP), submitted to EPA on December 

13, 2012, by the State of Tennessee, 

through the Tennessee Department of 

Environment and Conservation (TDEC). 

Tennessee’s December 13, 2012, SIP 

revision includes changes to the 

maintenance plan for the Knox County 

1-hour ozone area submitted on August 

26, 1992, and approved by EPA on 

September 27, 1993, and a subsequent 

SIP revision approved by EPA on 

August 5, 1997. The Knox County 1- 

hour ozone area was comprised of Knox 

County in its entirety. The December 13, 

2012 SIP revision proposes to increase 

the safety margin allocated to motor 

vehicle emissions budgets (MVEB) for 

nitrogen oxides (NOX) and volatile 

organic compounds (VOC) for Knox 

County to account for changes in the 

emissions model and vehicle miles 

traveled (VMT) projection model. EPA 

is approving this SIP revision because 

the State has demonstrated that it is 

consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA 

or Act). 

DATES: This rule is effective on April 22, 

2013 without further notice, unless EPA 

receives relevant adverse comment by 

March 22, 2013. If EPA receives such 

comment, EPA will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register 

informing the public that this rule will 

not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2012–0762 by one of the following 

methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: R4–RDS@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0762, 

Regulatory Development Section, Air 

Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae 

Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES