alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016222EN.01004602.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/46

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 April 2016 — Sommier v Commission

(Case F-40/13) (1)

(2016/C 222/63)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20/7/2013, p. 60.

---
No. 10-5914.

#### Thomas Leslie Kirkpatrick, Petitioner v. Guillermina Hall, Warden.

562 U.S. 983, 131 S. Ct. 417,

178 L. Ed. 2d 326,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8231.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-1386.

#### Maida Nussbaum, et vir, Petitioners v. Iser Koricki Miguelachuli, et al.

562 U.S. 831, 131 S. Ct. 104,

178 L. Ed. 2d 30,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6436.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico denied.
#### Com. v. Kovaleski

11/10/2015

406 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1146
# DLA 60th Anniversary Shout Out: Perry Knight, Deputy Commander, DLA Distribution

/ Published Sept. 22, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
00:13VIDEO  | 00:13 |DLA 60th Anniversary Shout Out: Perry Knight, Deputy Commander, DLA Distribution

Perry Knight, Deputy Commander, DLA Distribution, sends a shout out to DLA for the 60th Anniversary.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roger Vaughn, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 377]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bárbaro, J), rendered April 24, 2001, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of depraved indifference murder is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995]; *People v Ferguson,*240 AD2d 510, 511 [1997]; *People v Fama,*212 AD2d 542, 543 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of that crime beyond a reasonable doubt *(see People v Sanchez,*98 NY2d 373 [2002]; *People v Epps,*305 AD2d 697 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 620 [2003]; *People v Crawford,*295 AD2d 361, 362 [2002]; *People v Flowers,*289 AD2d 504 [2001]; *People v Tankleff,*199 AD2d 550, 553-554 [1993], *affd*84 NY2d 992 [1994]; *cf. People v Hafeez,*100 NY2d 253, 258-259 [2003]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 242

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require the Secretary

of Health and Human Services to consult with State medical societies

in revising the geographic adjustment factors used to determine the

amount of payment for physicians’ services under part B of the medicare

program, to require the Secretary to base geographic-cost-of-practice

indices under the program upon the most recent available data, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 27 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. PRYOR (for himself, Mr. GLENN, Mr. BRYAN, and Mr. COHEN) introduced

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee

on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to consult

with State medical societies in revising the geographic

adjustment factors used to determine the amount of payment for physicians’ services under part B of the medicare program, to require the Secretary to base geographic-cost-of-practice indices under the program upon

the most recent available data, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 242 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Geographic

3 Data Accuracy Act of 1993’’.

4 SEC. 2. IMPROVING ACCURACY OF GEOGRAPHIC ADJUST5 MENTS USED TO DETERMINE PAYMENT FOR

6 PHYSICIANS’ SERVICES UNDER MEDICARE.

7 (a) REQUIRING CONSULTATION WITH STATE MEDI8 CAL SOCIETIES IN REVISION OF GEOGRAPHIC ADJUST9 MENT FACTORS.—Section 1848(e)(1)(C) of the Social Se10 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–4(e)(1)(C)) is amended by

11 striking ‘‘may revise’’ and inserting ‘‘shall, in consultation

12 with each State medical society (or other appropriate or13 ganization representing the majority of the physicians who

14 practice in a State), revise’’.

15 (b) BASING GEOGRAPHIC-COST-OF-PRACTICE INDI16 CES ON MOST RECENT AVAILABLE DATA.—

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1848(e)(1) of such

18 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–4(e)(1)) is amended—

19 (A) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as

20 subparagraph (D); and

21 (B) by inserting after subparagraph (B)

22 the following new subparagraph:

23 ‘‘(C) DATA USED TO DETERMINE INDI24 CES.—In establishing indices under subpara25 graph (A), the Secretary shall use the most re26 cent available data relating to practice ex-
3

•S 242 IS

1 penses, malpractice expenses, and physicians’

2 work effort in the different fee schedule areas,

3 and shall obtain and review the data in con4 sultation with each State medical society (or

5 other appropriate organization representing the

6 majority of the physicians who practice in a

7 State).’’.

8 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

9 1848(e)(1)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–

10 4(e)(1)(A)) is amended in the matter preceding

11 clause (i) by striking ‘‘and (C)’’ and inserting ‘‘and

12 (D)’’.

13 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

14 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

15 payments for physicians’ services furnished on or after

16 January 1, 1994.

Æ
#### Etzler v. Etzler 34

05/18/2016

959 MAL (2015)

34

. Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter,

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 495
2017-0417.

#### State ex. rel. Lopez v. Summit Cty. Clerk of Courts.

In Mandamus. On respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion denied. Alternative writ granted. Briefing schedule set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05.

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

*1417O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

Fischer, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and would grant the motion to dismiss.
# Gimcheon material examiner nabs EOQ honors

/ Published Aug. 4, 2023
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Won Sok Chang will say he is a discoverer of sorts.

The Seoul native and family man clocks in each morning to accept property from U.S. military units at his office in Gimcheon, South Korea, and the search for answers never ends. What is this piece of equipment? Is it still useful? What are the rules for offering it to reuse customers? Do we need to destroy it? 

“The most enjoyable part of my role is [discovering] regulations for various types of property and learning how to handle them,” said Chang, a former Republic of Korea Army special forces airborne intel operator who has accumulated nearly a decade of U.S. government service. “I believe that we can only accomplish our mission of protecting the public when we are all doing our best in our roles.” 

Now serving as a Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services material examiner and identifier, Chang was recently recognized as a sub-command employee of the quarter for the second time since transferring to the organization from a role as a local national employee with the U.S. Army in 2020.

“When I worked at Camp Humphreys, I had the opportunity to visit [DLA] for the turn-in of general property,” said Chang, who had previous government roles as both a driver and a logistician. “I was impressed by the fact that Disposition Services had different regulations for handling different types of items. So, I wanted to be with DLA because they have such an established and systematic system.”

Chang called his recent employee of the quarter designation an honor and said he wanted to express his gratitude to agency teammates.

“My coworkers and I communicate with eye contact,” Chang said of the language barrier that comes with sharing a worksite with American coworkers. “All of my colleagues are very trustworthy and passionate about their services. We are dedicated to the performance of the mission based on that trust.”

Chang was credited with his instrumental role in helping the Gimcheon site achieve recent successes in its warehouse production metrics by Material Examiner and Identifier Supervisor Alfred Turner. During the reporting period, those metrics included the processing of 7,193 disposal turn-in documents, maintaining an “outstanding” 2.7-day customer wait time, 1.3-day average unprocessed receipt backlog, and “excellent” 38% “On-The-Shelf” rate average.

“He often performs a large portion of receipt inputs due to his expertise, attention to detail and commitment to quality,” Turner wrote. “This quarter he input approximately 34% of the DTIDs without any errors requiring inventory adjustment. His exceptional performance is a testament to his exceptional skills, professionalism, and commitment to excellence.”   

Turner also cited Chang for his informal warehouse leadership and positive impact on the team.

“I always do my best!” Chang said.
#### In the Matter of Daniel B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 230]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Weinstein, J.), dated March 14, 2003, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated January 31, 2003, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal trespass in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated January 31, 2003.

Ordered that the order of disposition is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the fact-finding order is vacated, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The appellant contends that the evidence was not legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he commit*441ted an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal trespass in the third degree. We agree.

To prove that a person is guilty of criminal trespass, the evidence must show that the person “knowingly enter [ed] or remain [ed] unlawfully” in a building or dwelling (Penal Law § 140.10, 140.15). A person “enters or remains unlawfully in or upon premises when he is not licensed or privileged to do so” (Penal Law § 140.00 [5]). The lack of a license or privilege to be in or upon premises may be proven by circumstantial evidence (see *People v Quinones,*173 AD2d 395 [1991]).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Presentment Agency (see *People v Williams,*84 NY2d 925 [1994]), we find that it was not legally sufficient to establish that the appellant lacked a license or privilege to be in or upon the premises *(cf. People v Quinones, supra).*The only evidence presented to establish that the appellant entered or remained unlawfully in or upon the premises was the testimony of a police officer, who observed the appellant in the lobby of an apartment building talking with an unidentified female who walked away upon the officer’s approach. Although the appellant advised the officer that he did not live in the building and was just “hanging [out],” and did not offer an explanation for his presence, it was not his obligation to do so. Rather, it was the Presentment Agency’s burden to prove unlawful entry or remaining, and it failed to do so. Accordingly, the order of disposition must be reversed and the fact-finding order vacated *(see Matter of Paul N.,*244 AD2d 489 [1997]). Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Townes, JJ., concur.
No. 10-6613.

#### Herbert Sperling, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 995, 131 S. Ct. 441,

178 L. Ed. 2d 345,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8247.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 367 Fed. Appx. 213.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                            |  |             
|------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|Name of Subsidiary                          |  | Jurisdiction
|1) Eastern Washakie Midstream Pipeline LLC, |  | Wyoming     
|                                            | 
|2) Petrosearch Energy Corporation           |  | Nevada      
|                                            | 
|3) Petrosearch Operating Company, LLC       |  | Texas       
|                                            | 
|4) Wilcox Petrosearch, LLC                  |  | Texas       
|                                            | 
|5) Anadarko Petrosearch, LLC                |  | Texas       
|                                            | 
|6) Barnett Petrosearch, LLC                 |  | Texas       
|                                            | 
|7) Beacon Petrosearch, LLC                  |  | Texas       
|                                            | 
|8) Guidance Petrosearch, LLC                |  | Texas       
|                                            | 
|9) Atlantic Rim Development Company, LLC    |  | Wyoming
# Grounded C-130 is given new life as a training aid

/ Published Aug. 26, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Once an aircraft’s flying days are over it might seem likely that aircraft no longer serves a purpose but Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services team on Ft. Stewart, Georgia, has found a way to make use of a flightless aircraft while improving the effectiveness of a Marine Corps unit.

                C-130 is given new life as training aid                            Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services members on Ft. Stewart, Georgia prepare a C-130 fuselage for transport to Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 210825-D-D0441-202Tactical recovery of aircraft and personnel training is an essential skill as it gives Marines the ability to recover isolated personnel and return them back home safely. Personnel receive training on recovering service members in the unfortunate event that an aircraft is forced to crash land.

“There have been a couple of accidents involving C-130s in the past several years,” explained James O’Brien an aviation requirements and systems manager. “Normally the Marine Corps is limited to helicopters and small aircraft, so this was an opportunity to do some training on a larger platform.”

While TRAP training takes place regularly, and on multiple platforms, the most common types are CH-53s and MV-22 Ospreys. For the Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron in Yuma, Arizona this opportunity was too good to pass up. It was not a simple endeavor as the C-130 fuselage would need transporting across the country from its longtime home in Georgia.

                C-130 is given new life as training aid                            Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services team members on Ft. Stewart, Georgia prepare a disabled C-130 fuselage for transport to Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 210825-D-D0441-201“It has been sitting in the same place for several years,” O’Brien said. “They were going to scrap the fuselage and that would have been a total loss to the government. Instead, there was a need shown for making use of the C-130.”

This is a historical moment for Marine Corps Air Station Yuma as it will be the first C-130 training fuselage. Once on station, the fuselage will undergo a thorough cleaning and begin its days as a training tool for ACSR personnel in support of Marine Corps Aviation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,063                   9,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,678                  28,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                       666                     666
<INVENTORY>                                      1,435                   1,435
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,840                  54,840
<PP&E>                                          24,485                  24,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,260                   7,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 772,976                 772,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,604                  94,604
<BONDS>                                        523,700                 523,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           336                     336
<OTHER-SE>                                     131,899                 131,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   772,976                 772,976
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,049                 254,223
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,308                 156,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,991                  70,656
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   325                   1,109
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,743                  28,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,480)                 (2,356)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (470)                     224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,684)                 (1,239)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,684)                 (1,239)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)                  (0.04)

</TABLE>
#### Daniel Collazo et al., Appellants, v Netherland Property Assets LLC et al., Respondents.

[64 NYS3d 537]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Cohen, J.), entered March 7, 2017, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in ruling that plaintiffs’ rent overcharge claims should be determined by the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal in the first instance *(Olsen v Stellar W. 110, LLC,*96 AD3d 440, 441-442 [1st Dept 2012], *lv dismissed*20 NY3d 1000 [2013]). The court also correctly ruled that plaintiffs had failed to state a cause of action for relief under General Business Law § 349 *(Aguaiza v Vantage Props., LLC,*69 AD3d 422, 423 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur—Richter, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Oing and Singh, JJ.
No. 09-1279.

#### Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. AT&T Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 1000, 131 S. Ct. 551,

178 L. Ed. 2d 367,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8507.

November 1, 2010.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary C. Granoff, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.





By: /s/Gary C. Granoff

Gary C. Granoff

President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer



May 15, 2006
No. 10-5661.

#### Harold Bosier, Petitioner v. Gila Group, et al.

562 U.S. 964, 131 S. Ct. 460,

178 L. Ed. 2d 293,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8099.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.