alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014024EN.01000302.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo no 6 de Bilbao (Spain) lodged on 25 October 2013 — Grupo Hospitalario Quirón S.A. v Departamento de Sanidad del Gobierno Vasco

o

(Case C-552/13)

2014/C 24/05

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo no 6 de Bilbao

o

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Grupo Hospitalario Quirón S.A.

Applicant:

Defendant: Departamento de Sanidad del Gobierno Vasco

Defendant:

Co-defendant: Instituto de Religiosas Siervas de Jesús de la Caridad

Co-defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the requirement, included in public contracts for the management of public health-care services, that the provision of health services which is the subject-matter of such contracts be carried out ONLY in a determined municipality, which is not necessarily the municipality in which the patients reside, compatible with European Union law?

---
No. 10-6261.

#### Amos Rico Bowers, Jr., Petitioner v. S. L. Burt, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 973, 131 S. Ct. 488,

178 L. Ed. 2d 309,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7976.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 09-1580.

#### Kreig Prosper, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 841, 131 S. Ct. 222,

178 L. Ed. 2d 48,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6046.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 190.
No. 10-5142.

#### David Mobley, Petitioner v. Ohio.

562 U.S. 906, 131 S. Ct. 249,

178 L. Ed. 2d 165,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7080.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fairfield County, denied.
#### In the Matter of Jeffrey Jackson, Petitioner, v Warden Mills (A.M.K.C.), Respondent.

[65 NYS3d 690]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice *546Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1559]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Purusant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 United States Code, Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of 
the following meeting:

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders, Communication Disorders Review Committee.
    Date: March 4-6, 1998.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Melissa Stick, Ph.D., M.P.H., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIDCD/DEA/SRB, EPS Room 400C, 6120 Executive 
Boulevard, MSC 7180, Bethesda MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. The 
meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set forth 
in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, United States Code. 
The applications and/or proposals and the discussion could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.173 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders)

    Dated: January 15, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-1559 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/21

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■

■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

★ ● ● ●

●
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16856]



[[Page 34368]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, July 17, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-16856 Filed 6-19-98; 4:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
## FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 03/05/99 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK [PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 98-4426

________________________ D. C. Docket No. 97-3108-CIV-LENARD ERNESTO ALONSO MEJIA RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
versus JANET RENO, as Attorney General of the United States, and the IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondents-Appellees.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________ (March 5, 1999) Before CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge. 

### PER CURIAM: The Court sua sponte VACATES its opinion in the above-styled case, which is currently published at 164 F.3d 575 (11th Cir. 1999). The case is resubmitted to the Court for decision. Petitioner/Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is DENIED as MOOT
.
#### Friedman v. W.C.A.B. (Temple University Hosp.); Temple University Hosp., In re

11/17/2015

290 EAL (2015)

Denied
#### People v Rogers

App Term, 1st Dept: 54 Misc 3d 130(A) (NY)

denied 3/15/17 (DiFiore, Ch. J.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DAVID KABAKOFF, PH.D., in his 

capacity as Stockholders’ Agent,

Plaintiff Below,

 Appellant,

v.

ZENECA, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation, and MEDIMMUNE, LLC, 

a Delaware limited liability company,

Defendants Below,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 430, 2020

Court Below – Court of Chancery

of the State of Delaware

 C.A. No. 2017-0459-JRS

Submitted: October 13, 2021

Decided: October 21, 2021

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, VAUGHN, TRAYNOR, and

MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc.

ORDER

On this 21st day of October, 2021, after careful consideration of all briefs and 

the record on appeal, and after oral argument, we find it evident that the final 

judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the 

reasons stated in the January 24, 2020 bench ruling, November 18, 2020 opinion, 

and November 25, 2020 order.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery

isAFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves

Justice
No. 10-5292.

#### Jerry L. Maske, Petitioner v. Valerie Estrada, et al.

562 U.S. 913, 131 S. Ct. 272,

178 L. Ed. 2d 179,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7440.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
No. 09-10460.

#### Zachary B. Taylor, Petitioner v. James F. Degrott, et al.

562 U.S. 823, 131 S. Ct. 382,

178 L. Ed. 2d 17,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6291.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Commercial Refriger... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/...

1 of 1 1/12/2009 4:46 PM

EERE Information Center

Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version

Commercial Refrigeration 

Equipment Final Rule 

Analytical Spreadsheets

The analytical spreadsheets below provide the 

final rule findings and interactive tools for the 

engineering analysis, life-cycle cost analysis, 

and national impact analysis. Instructions on 

how to use the life-cycle cost and national 

impact analysis spreadsheets can be found in 

the final rule Technical Support Document

appendices.

Engineering Analysis (Excel 2.8 MB)

Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis (Excel 50

MB)

National Impact Analysis (NIA) 

(Excel 17.6 MB)

Contact Information

Charles Llenza

Project Manager

(202) 586-2192

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 01/09/2009

EERE-2006-BT-STD-0126 COMMENT 52.3
No. 10-230.

#### Fishermen’s Finest Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Gary F. Locke, Secretary of Commerce.

562 U.S. 963, 131 S. Ct. 474,

178 L. Ed. 2d 290,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7974.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 593 F.3d 886.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2312 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2312

 To maintain the ability of United States agriculture to remain viable 
and competitive in domestic and international markets, to meet the food 
 and fiber needs of United States and international consumers, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 22 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

  Mr. Daschle introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To maintain the ability of United States agriculture to remain viable 
and competitive in domestic and international markets, to meet the food 
 and fiber needs of United States and international consumers, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in order to 
maintain the ability of United States agriculture to remain viable and 
competitive in domestic and international markets, the Secretary of 
Agriculture, consistent with the obligations of the United States to 
limit agricultural export subsidies as set forth in the Uruguay Round 
Agreement and notwithstanding any other provision of law, shall--
            (1) make available and aggressively utilize in each fiscal 
        year the funds and commodities of the Commodity Credit 
        Corporation in the maximum amounts allowed under the Agreement 
        for the export enhancement program, the dairy export incentive 
        program, the cottonseed oil assistance program, and the 
        sunflowerseed oil assistance program; and
            (2) make available additional funds and commodities in each 
        fiscal year in an amount equal to the total of the reductions 
        below the amounts made available in fiscal year 1994 for the 
        programs described in paragraph (1) that are made as a 
        condition of compliance with the budgetary outlay or volume 
        restrictions on agricultural export subsidies under the 
        Agreement, in addition to any funds or commodities that may be 
        authorized, appropriated, or otherwise made available, for 
        authorized export promotion, foreign market development, export 
        credit guarantee, and international food assistance programs, 
        for commodity purchases under the Emergency Food Assistance 
        Program, and to promote the development, processing, 
        commercialization, and marketing of products resulting from 
        alternative uses of agricultural commodities, including 
        vegetable oil.
                                 <all>
```
906 CERTIFICATION

EXHIBIT 32.2

Date: February 11, 2004

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of GiveMePower Corp.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jim
Bolokoski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      /s/Jim Bolokoski
                                         --------------
                                         Jim Bolokoski
                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### Barry v Cadman Towers, Inc.

2d Dept: 136 AD3d 951

denied
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-30593

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JASON BYNUM, also known as 

Jason James Bynum,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-50066-1

--------------------

December 13, 2000

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jason Bynum appeals the revocation of his supervised

release. He complains that the “Petition on Probation and

Supervised Release” failed to “reference violation of any

condition of his supervised release.” He also contends that the

Government failed to prove its case, “[i]f limited to the

evidence at the initial hearing, as it should be[.]” 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
No. 00-30593

-2-

revoking supervised release. See United States v. McCormick, 54

F.3d 214, 219 (5th Cir. 1995); see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). The

Petition on Probation and Supervised Release charged Bynum with

threatening suicide and with “threaten[ing] bodily harm to an

employee of the Creswell Hotel on November 24, 1999.” At the

revocation hearing, the district court provided Bynum’s counsel

with an opportunity to contest the charges, to present evidence

on Bynum’s behalf, and to conduct cross-examination. 

Furthermore, the district court did not abuse its discretion

when it allowed the Government to introduce additional evidence

over Bynum’s objection. See United States v. Rodriguez, 43 F.3d

117, 125 (5th Cir. 1995)(direct appeal). As the Government

proved by a preponderance of the evidence that a condition of

release had been violated, no abuse of discretion has been shown.

See McCormick, 54 F.3d at 219. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# Troop Support helps service members celebrate Palm Sunday, Easter

/ Published March 24, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

Military service members around the world observed Palm Sunday and will celebrate Easter with some help from Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support.

More than 16,000 pounds of ham and 6,660 pounds of salmon were provided by the Subsistence supply chain for troops serving in Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, and Afghanistan in time to enjoy an Easter meal March 27, said Anthony Amendolia, Subsistence customer operations supervisor. 

“It’s a meal they can enjoy and is a little bit different than what they usually get,” said Amendolia. “(We) do everything we can to make the day special and to provide a taste of home for the holidays.”

Subsistence also ensured the delivery of 9,660 bottles of non-alcoholic sparkling juice, 12,312 pounds of shrimp and 4,336 pies, including coconut cream and lemon meringue pies.

The Clothing and Textiles supply chain delivered 270 bottles of grape juice and 83 cases of sacramental wine to be used during Easter services, said Earl Joyner, a contract specialist with C&T. 

C&T also delivered 228 fan leaves of palms and 17,900 double strips of palm for service members in the U.S. and overseas to observe Palm Sunday March 20.

 Joseph Roshinko, with C&T’s ecclesiastical support team, worked closely with DLA Distribution to ensure that service members overseas received the palms.  

 “These men and women are deployed keeping our country safe,” said Roshinko. “It is important to me that we support them for their respective holidays,” said Roshinko
No. 10-5147.

#### Tamara Azure, aka Tamara Wind, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 906, 131 S. Ct. 250,

178 L. Ed. 2d 165,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6942.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 596 F.3d 449.
# DLA Energy Airmen among top one percent selected for elite program

/ Published Sept. 14, 2015
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, *This is the third article in a series of DLA Energy workforce development opportunities.*
#### People v Bottomley

3d Dept: 146 AD3d 1026 (Schenectady)

denied 3/21/17 (Garcia, J.)
# Suppliers get in-person answers at help desk during conference

/ Published May 23, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
After several years of working in virtual environments with endless emails and meetings on computer screens, many are looking for ways to work together again in the same room.

The Defense Logistics Agency gave its suppliers a chance to meet in-person during the Supply Chain Alliance Conference and Exhibition held earlier this month in Richmond. A help desk also allowed suppliers to ask questions and address issues face-to-face with DLA representatives, said Navy Cmdr. Mike DiProspero, deputy director of pre-award supplier operations commodities for DLA Aviation.

Suppliers could make an appointment or walk up to the desk for assistance in four areas: pre-awards, post awards, technical quality and long-term contracts.

Forty-three appointments were scheduled before the conference, and another 110 suppliers signed up during the two-day event. Thirteen employees from DLA Aviation and DLA Land and Maritime helped provide answers.

“Once suppliers saw that they could interact with a government representative, they started signing up and saw that this would be good opportunity for them and to have a face-to-face opportunity with the government side,” DiProspero said.

The idea to set up an in-person help desk came after a DLA Land and Maritime conference in Columbus, Ohio, last year where agency representatives took questions from suppliers on the spot. Suppliers appreciated the chance to interact with DLA representatives so much that DiProspero said the decision was made to set up a help desk at the conference in Richmond.

DLA is working to increase interaction with its suppliers, said Nicholas Meads, the contracting officer in post award supplier operations at DLA Aviation.

“Meeting face-to-face in this forum helps build a better bond between DLA and the supplier. They like meeting in person, even though you might talk to them every day on the phone,” Meads said.

Some suppliers simply wanted to meet the DLA person they worked with over the phone or through email in the last three years.

DiProspero said he overheard two suppliers marveling after a 15-minute conversation with the help desk at how fast they were able to resolve an issue that had plagued them for months.

“That’s what made me feel like it was worthwhile, knowing that we were able to help a struggling supplier with a DLA issue,” he said.

Some suppliers said the help desk was one of the best parts of the conference, DiProspero said, adding that it is advantageous to have an informed and educated supplier who knows how to submit an offer or post-award request or inquiries.

“I think it’s a win-win for both government and the defense industry because we're all benefiting from this free sharing of information. Having the help desk at future conferences will be a vital part of that cohesion that the defense industry and DLA needs to continue on as we move forward,” he continued.
2016-1811.

#### State v. Campbell.

Cuyahoga App. No. 103982, 2016-Ohio-7613.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Deutsche Bank Trust Company, N. A. a/k/a Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00003

- CV v.

Kenneth W. Hall and Roberta Hall, Appellee s Appeal from the 402nd Judicial Di strict Court of Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2012

- 474 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the cour t below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the tr ial court and remand the cause for
further proceedings

. We further order that the appell ee s , Kenneth W. Hall and Roberta Hall , pay all costs of
this appeal.

RENDERED MAY 7, 2013
B Y ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk