alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[53 NYS3d 371]

#### In the Matter of Eyal Katzman, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

May 3, 2017

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Diana Maxfield Kearse,*Brooklyn *(Mark F. DeWan*of counsel), for petitioner.

*129OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

On July 14, 2016, the respondent was found guilty in the Supreme Court, Queens County, after a jury trial, of the following crimes: criminal sexual act in the third degree, in violation of Penal Law § 130.40 (2), a class E felony (four counts); patronizing a person for prostitution in the third degree, in violation of Penal Law § 230.04, a class A misdemeanor (four counts), and endangering the welfare of a child in violation of Penal Law § 260.10 (1), a class A misdemeanor (five counts). On November 23, 2016, the respondent was sentenced to two consecutive one-year sentences, to be served in the custody of the New York City Department of Correction.

The Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts now moves to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) based upon his felony convictions. Although the respondent was duly served, he has neither opposed the instant motion, nor interposed any response thereto.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), the respondent was automatically disbarred and ceased to be an attorney upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the motion to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law is granted, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), to reflect the respondent’s automatic disbarment as of July 14, 2016.

Eng, P.J., Rivera., Dillon, Balkin and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), the respondent, Eyal Katzman, is disbarred, effective July 14, 2016, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b); and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent, Eyal Katzman, shall comply with the rules governing the conduct of disbarred or suspended attorneys *(see*22 NYCRR 1240.15); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Eyal Katzman, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, com*130mission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that if the respondent, Eyal Katzman, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency, and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1240.15 (f).
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 19, 2016

NO. 03

- 15

- 00496

- CV

Steven C. Albright and Rhonda Albright, Appellant s

v.

Rhea & Sons Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Rhea Plumbing, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DIST RICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND FIELD AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

--

OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the jud gment signed by the tr i a l court on May 20 , 2015 . Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the trial

court’s judgment

. Therefore, the Court reverse s the trial court’s o rder granting summary

judgment as to the Albright’s negligence claims against Rhea and remand s for further

proceedings consistent with this opinion. We affirm the order in all other respects. Each party

shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14521]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Notice of Open Special Meeting of the Advisory Committee of the 
Export-Import Bank of the United States (Export-Import Bank)

Summary: The Advisory Committee was established by P.L. 98-181, 
November 30, 1993, to advise Export-Import Bank on its programs and to 
provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import Bank 
of the United States to Congress.

Time and Place: Tuesday, June 16, 1998, at 9:30 am. The meeting will be 
held at the Export-Import Bank in room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW, 
Washington, D.C. 20571.

Agenda: The meeting will include a discussion of Ex-Im Bank's annual 
Competitiveness Report to Congress. In addition there will be 
discussions regarding information collected from exporters of the net 
impact of Ex-Im Bank's foreign content policy on the U.S. economy and 
specifically on U.S. jobs; Medium term delegated authority based on 
interviews with banks to determine whether the banking community has 
the capacity to or interest in taking additional risk; and Project 
Finance: bringing private sector expertise to bear on how Ex-Im Bank 
can resolve the administrative issues associated with comprehensive 
pre-completion cover.

Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public participation, 
and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or 
comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) 
before or after the meeting. In order to permit the Export-Import Bank 
to arrange suitable accommodations, any person wishes auxiliary aids 
(such as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodation, 
please contact, prior to June 9, 1998, Megan Becher, Room 1284, Vermont 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3507. Voice: (202) 565-3955 
or TDD (202) 565-3377.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: For further information, contact Megan Becher, 
Room 1284, 811 Vermont Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3507.
Kenneth Hansen,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-14521 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
No. 10-5863.

#### Va Thi Nguyen, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 936, 131 S. Ct. 352,

178 L. Ed. 2d 229,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7410.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 886.
No. 10-5485.

#### Edward Meredith, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 924, 131 S. Ct. 307,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7277,

178 L. Ed. 2d 199,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

*200Same case below, 28 So. 3d 50.
No. 10-201.

#### John J. Grabner, III, Petitioner v. H&R Block Enterprises, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 897, 131 S. Ct. 347,

178 L. Ed. 2d 148,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6177.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 772.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Donald Gayhardt, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dollar Financial Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: c) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  d) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];  e) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  f) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): g) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  h) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:September 20, 2005     /s/ *Donald Gayhardt*     Donald Gayhardt  President
92
[638 NYS2d 371]

#### In the Matter of David C. Tassell, an Attorney, Resignor.

Fourth Department,

February 2, 1996

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*David C. Tassell,*Jupiter, Florida, resignor *pro se.*

*Gerard M. LaRusso,*Buffalo, for Grievance Committee.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on February 17, 1984 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that, in 1985, he moved to Florida where he was admitted and currently practices law. He states that he has no intention of returning to this State and is resigning *363because he no longer wishes to maintain his attorney registration in New York. There are no complaints pending against him.

We grant the application and direct that his name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.
No. 09-1518.

#### Warren Havens, et al., Petitioners v. Mobex Network Services, LLC, et al.

562 U.S. 838, 131 S. Ct. 179,

178 L. Ed. 2d 42,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5818.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, denied.
**~,w,~** JS ,:::: -, **~** Fields of Opportunities TERRY
E. BRANSTAD, GOVERNOR KIM REYNOLDS,
LT. GOVERNOR November 25,2015 Mark Hague Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region

7 c/o Air Planning and Development Branch 11201 Renner Blvd. Lenexa,ICansas 66219 Re: SIP revision request Dear Mr. Hague: STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT

OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHUGKGIPP, DIRECTOR The Iowa Department

of Natural Resources requests revisions

to the Iowa State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the enclosed Polk County Board of Health Rules and Regulations- Chapter

V (Air Pollution). The Polk County Board of Supervisors (the Board) adopted the enclosed amendments

on October

6, 2015, after the public hearing and public board meetings. The Board has full legal authority

to develop rules pursuant

to Section455B

of the Iowa Code. The Board and Polk County followed
all applicable administmtive procedures

in proposing and adopting these rules. Enclosed are the required submittal elements for determination

of plan completeness
per 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix

V. The notice of public hearing was published

in The Des Moines Register on September

4, 2015 and September
21, 2015. No written or oral comments were provided during the comment period that extended from September

1, 20 15, through October

6, 2015. The Board made no changes
to the final rules from what was proposed. The effective date of these adopted amendments

is October 12, 2015. Copies of the affidavits
of publication
are enclosed. The Iowa Department

of Natural Resources requests that the Environmental Protection Agency amend the SIP to include the changes made to the Polk County- Air Quality Division regulations. The requested change
to the SIP includes Article

1 through Article XIII, including definitions, insofar
as they pertain
to the SIP. Additionally, Items 3-6 (pertaining

to Article VI and Article VIII) are specifically excluded fi·om this request. 7900 Hickman Road, Suite 1/Windsor Heights, Iowa 50324 515-242-5100
FAX 515-242-5094 www.lowaCieanAir.govIfyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthissubmittal,pleasecontactChristinePaulsonat(515)725-9510.Sincerely,CLJ__ChuckGippDirectorIowaDepartmentofNaturalResourcesEnclosures:Affidavitsofpublication,finalchangestoPolkCountyregulations,Boardsignaturepages,andfinalPolkCountyBoardofHealthRulesandRegulations(ChapterV-AirPollution)(effectiveOctober12.2015)cc:HeatherHamilton,EPARegion7,withenclosures-byemail2
#### Com. v. Jones

10/07/2015

220 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1120
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mediacom LLC (the Company) on
Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rocco
B. Commisso, Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. May 21, 2004
    
    BY:
    
    /s/ ROCCO B. COMMISSORocco B. CommissoChief Executive OfficerBY:
    
    /s/ MARK E. STEPHANMark E. StephanChief Financial Officer
# DLA expands refueling capability and Pacific resiliency

/ Published May 28, 2015
#### Com. v. Mason

04/20/2016

031 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 130 A.3d 148
No. D-2508.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Earl D. Munroe.

562 U.S. 810, 131 S. Ct. 399,

178 L. Ed. 2d 264,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7570.

October 4, 2010.

Earl D. Munroe, of Saugus, Massachusetts, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 *265days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-101391, 333-101389,333-101388, and 333-101387) of Constar International, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 31, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

SHANNON MCGRATH,

Respondent

v.

BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL AND 

OCCUPATIONAL AFFAIRS, STATE 

BOARD OF NURSING,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 365 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by the Petitioner, are: 

(1) Whether this Honorable Court should grant allocatur in a case of first 

impression in this Court and one of substantial public importance to 

consumer health and safety requiring prompt resolution involving the 

length of an automatic license suspension of a nurse licensee convicted of 

a drug felony where the Commonwealth Court incorrectly reversed its prior 

correct application of Section 1921(c) of the Statutory Construction Act 

and created a paradigm in which a nurse licensee may be suspended for 

as little as one day for the same conduct that bars a nurse applicant from 

obtaining a license for ten years? 

(2) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in ignoring case law and the 

principles of statutory construction when it applied the rule of lenity to a 

statute that was no longer ambiguous under Packer’s interpretation?

(3) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in not applying the principle of 

stare decisis as Packer was not clearly contrary to the body of law?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          134449
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   478105
<ALLOWANCES>                                     28571
<INVENTORY>                                    1050027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2888086
<PP&E>                                         4790357
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3826425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4713202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1444548
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4713202
<SALES>                                        2324597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2324597
<CGS>                                          2052787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   806904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              212738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (747832)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    301028
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (446804)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (446804)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)
        

</TABLE>
No. 09-10012.

#### Duggan L. Higginbottom, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 843, 131 S. Ct. 74,

178 L. Ed. 2d 51,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5794.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 349 Fed. Appx. 406.
No. 10-5093.

#### Clarence Hendrix, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 903, 131 S. Ct. 240,

178 L. Ed. 2d 160,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6256.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 365 Fed. Appx. 10.
# Tobyhanna’s East Storage Inventory team wins Distribution’s Team of the Quarter award

/ Published July 20, 2015
TOBYHANNA, Pennsylvania, 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Tobyhanna, Pa.’s, East Storage Inventory team has been awarded the DLA Distribution Team of the Quarter award for second quarter, fiscal year 2015 for its work with the program manager stock program. 
Through DLA Distribution Tobyhanna, participating PMs are able to maintain stocks co-located with their servicing maintenance activity, while having those stocks controlled on a DoD accountable record that’s also audit compliant.

This new program presented a new challenge for the inventory team, made up of Joseph Gensel and Joseph Henshaw. More than 160,000 sq. ft. of newly-acquired material needed sorted and catalogued. Beginning in October 2014, Gensel and Henshaw began this cataloguing process, and have completed six program manager’s entire inventory.

Gensel and Henshaw established new detailed spreadsheets, segregated by projects, to manage the new material. “The entire operation can hinge on the inventory team’s spreadsheets being up-to-date and accurate,” said Robert Dodson, deputy commander of the distribution center. 

“Mr. Henshaw and Mr. Gensel bring a positive attitude to work with them every day, and other employees feed off that,” said Benjamin Herring, the duo’s supervisor. “They also bring a work ethic that is admired by other team members.”
# DLA Installation Management San Joaquin Police Department Recognized by Congress

/ Published Aug. 30, 2022
TRACY, Calif., 
TRACY, Calif — The men and women of Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management San Joaquin’s police force received recognition during a morning ceremony at Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin for vetting over 600 commercial trucks with a 100% accuracy rate in support of the Presidential COVID-19 Rapid Test Kit initiative, providing free tests to the American public.

Representative Josh Harder, from California’s 10th District, presented a Congressional Record to the department Aug. 23 for their hard work and dedication to this critical mission.

Jonathan Mathews, DLA Installation Management San Joaquin site director kicked off the event in the fire bay, conveying his appreciation for the department and letting them know that he and the DLA Distribution San Joaquin Commander, Marine Col. Kevin Chunn and his leadership team appreciate everything they do. 

“You [police personnel], fire personnel and our dispatchers are here 24/7, including holidays when your families are celebrating without you. You are here standing in the heat and cold at the gates, patrolling buildings and the installation perimeter,” said Mathews. “I am so proud of you and want to say thank you for all that you do.”

Harder personally thanked the police department for keeping the installation safe and getting their jobs done even during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Thank you for all the incredible work you have done in our community in keeping this installation safe. While businesses shut down in the Central Valley and in Tracy, this installation made sure the Armed Forces were getting what they needed across the globe and for sure for the police department that had to make sure the installation functioned smoothly,” he commented. “Your job didn’t get easier, it got tougher with longs days. Thank you for the job you do and thank you for making sure 100% of deliveries to this facility are successful. You are a testament to the spirit of the Central Valley.” 

Immediately following the ceremony, Harder received a tour of the police’s MILO Range Training Simulator and learned how important it is for officers to train in different scenarios for real-world events.