alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
164 A.3d 406

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CENTENNIAL LAND & DEVELOPMENT CORP., DEVEL, LLC, DEFENDANTS-MOVANTS, AND STEPHEN D. SAMOST, DEFENDANT, AND TOWNSHIP OF MEDFORD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, DEFENDANT, AND JOSEPH SAMOST, DEFENDANT; AND CENTENNIAL PINES CLUB, DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. JOSEPH SAMOST, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT/FOURTH-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. STEPHEN D. SAMOST, FOURTH-PARTY DEFENDANT.

March 23, 2017

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a motion for leave to appeal as within time (M-896) is granted.
2016-1161.

#### State ex rel. Morley v. Zmuda.

Lucas App. No. L-16-1119. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Bioenvision, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended June 30, 2003as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David P. Luci,
Director of Finance and General Counsel of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





                                /s/ David P. Luci
                                ---------------------------------------
                                David P. Luci
                                Director of Finance and General Counsel
                                September 29, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly
report of Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc. & Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of
March 31, 2004.





/s/ James DiLorenzo
-------------------
Name: James DiLorenzo
Title: Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



Date: August 12, 2004
#### Elvis S. Brun, Appellant, v Jason M. Farningham et al., Respondents.

[51 NYS3d 172]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Onofry, J.), dated December 9, 2014, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident, and denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and (2) a judgment of the same court dated February 6, 2015, which, upon the order, is in favor of the defendants and against him dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see Matter ofAho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that *687the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]). The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injury to the plaintiff’s right knee and right ankle did not constitute a serious injury under either the permanent consequential limitation of use or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Vasquez v John Doe #1,*73 AD3d 1033, 1033 [2010]) and, in any event, was not caused by the subject accident *(see II Chung Lim v Chrabaszcz,*95 AD3d 950, 951 [2012]; *Larson v Delgado,*71 AD3d 739, 740 [2010]; *Mensah v Badu,*68 AD3d 945, 945-946 [2009]). The defendants also demonstrated, prima facie, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury under the 90/180 category of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Ferazzoli v Hamilton,*141 AD3d 686, 687 [2016]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Because the plaintiff did not raise any triable issues of fact as to “the threshold issue of serious injury” *(McLoud v Reyes,*82 AD3d 848, 849 [2011]), the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability was properly denied, as it was academic *(see Zawaski v Salzano, 77*AD3d 823, 824 [2010]). Dillon, J.P, Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Indonesia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Indonesia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | 7.52   | 10.17  | 6.96   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 10-5164.

#### Emeregildo Roman, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 907, 131 S. Ct. 252,

178 L. Ed. 2d 167,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7105.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 28.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2016

No. 04-16-00017-CR

James MOODY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 413867

The Honorable Robert Behrens, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On September 6, 2016, we ordered Pat Montgomery, counsel for appellant, to file 

a copy of his letter to the appellant, James Moody, demonstrating counsel has complied with 

the requirements of Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). No response or 

motion for extension of time has been filed. Our records reflect that Mr. Montgomery has 

been contacted twice about filing proof of his compliance with Kelly. Our records show Mr. 

Montgomery represented to this court he would file a copy of his letter to Moody by 

September 21, 2016. Mr. Montgomery has not filed a copy of the letter. 

We therefore order Pat Montgomery to file, by September 29, 2016, proof that he 

has sent a letter to Moody (1) notifying Moody that he has filed an Anders brief and motion 

to withdraw and enclose copies of the documents, (2) informing Moody of his right to review 

the appellate record and file a pro se brief, (3) informing Moody of his right to file a pro se 

petition for discretionary review should the court of appeals determine the appeal is frivolous, 

and (4) showing counsel has “take[n] concrete measures to initiate and facilitate the process 

of actuating [appellant’s] right to review the appellate record, if that is what [appellant] 

wishes.” Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Ex parte Owens, 206 

S.W.3d 670-74 n. 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2006). Counsel is advised that if he fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be 

abated for an abandonment hearing.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of September, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Dettmering v. Passarge

DA 16-0723

06/27/17

2017 MT 161N

Affirmed

Dist. 11 (Flathead)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33612]


The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company; Trackage 
Rights Exemption; Union Pacific Railroad Company

    Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) has agreed to grant overhead 
trackage rights to The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company 
(BNSF) between Dallas, TX, in the vicinity of UP's milepost 214.6 
(Dallas Subdivision) and Tower 55, Fort Worth, TX, in the vicinity of 
UP's milepost 245.5 (Dallas Subdivision), a distance of approximately 
30.9 miles.<SUP>1</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On June 4, 1998, BNSF and UP filed a petition for exemption 
in STB Finance Docket No. 33612 (Sub-No. 1), The Burlington Northern 
and Santa Fe Railway Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--Union 
Pacific Railroad Company, wherein BNSF and UP request that the Board 
permit the overhead trackage rights arrangement described in the 
present proceeding to expire on July 31, 1998. That petition will be 
addressed by the Board in a separate decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on June 15, 1998.
    The purpose of the trackage rights is to allow BNSF to operate over 
an alternative line while BNSF's line is undergoing maintenance and 
repair.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33612, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Yolanda M. Grimes, Esq., The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe 
Railway Company, P. O. Box 961039, Fort Worth, TX 76161-0039.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: June 15, 1998.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16531 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
No. 10-5099.

#### Robert F. Bortolon, Petitioner v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of California.

562 U.S. 903, 131 S. Ct. 241,

178 L. Ed. 2d 161,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6153.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# DLA Installation Management Susquehanna begins annual April PrepareAthon information campaign

/ Published April 4, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
April’s PrepareAthon was developed to motivate everyone to act and to prepare for disasters that may affect their communities. Each week in April, DLA Installation Management Susquehanna’s Emergency Management will provide topics to assist employees in preparation for emergency incidents or disasters at work or at home. 

Severe weather in the spring - A few points to know:

Thunderstorms
      - Severe thunderstorms can produce damaging wind and/or large hail.
      - When you hear thunder there’s lightning. “When thunder roars, go indoors.”
      - Lightning is a leading cause of injury and death from weather related hazards.
      - See attachment for additional information.

Tornadoes
      - Even in the mid-Atlantic region, tornadoes can happen anytime, anywhere!
      - Tornadoes can destroy buildings, flip cars, and create deadly flying debris.
      - If a tornado warning is issued, seek immediate shelter in the nearest Shelter-In-Place location. If not at work seek shelter in a basement, or interior room away from windows on the lowest floor and cover your head.                                          

Floods
      - Check local news or the Pennsylvania travel website -  511PA  to see if roads are closed.
      - Watch for messages from the Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna’s AtHoc Mass Notification Warning System which may direct you to another installation entrance due to local flooded roads.
      - Turn around, don’t drown.  Never walk, swim, or drive through floodwaters as they may be contaminated and contain dangerous debris. Downed power lines can also electrically charge the water.

For more information related to storm preparedness check with your local DLA Distribution Emergency Services manager. Additional preparedness information can be found at www.ready.gov.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40841

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ASHLEY EVELYN MORSE,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 702

Filed: October 7, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Canyon County. Hon. Molly J. Huskey, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of four years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of two years, for burglary, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Ashley Evelyn Morse pled guilty to burglary. I.C. § 18-1401. In exchange for her guilty 

plea, additional charges were dismissed.1 The district court sentenced Morse to a unified term of 

four years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. Morse also filed an I.C.R. 35 

motion for reduction of her sentence, which the district court denied. Morse appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

 

1 Morse also pled guilty to misdemeanor battery. However, she does not challenge this 

judgment of conviction or sentence on appeal. 
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Morse’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
No. 09-11321.

#### In re Allah, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 178,

178 L. Ed. 2d 255,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7755,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
No. 09-1482.

#### Ancil N. Payne, Jr., et ux., Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

562 U.S. 836, 131 S. Ct. 151,

178 L. Ed. 2d 38,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5984.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 734.
# Europe distribution center to welcome new deputy commander

/ Published Aug. 27, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Neil G. Flanagan joins the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution team Aug. 30, to serve as deputy commander, DLA Distribution Europe in Germersheim, Germany.

“Neil is no stranger to Distribution. His current assignment is Operations Director of Wholesale for DLA Distribution Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Serving in this role since January 2020, Neil was responsible for distribution operations for all 272 Hawaii based customers and transitioning battle groups,” said Marine Corps Brig. Gen. Keith D. Reventlow, commanding general of DLA Distribution.

Prior to joining federal service, Flanagan had a successful career in the private sector. His most recent experience was owning and running a men’s fashion e-commerce website in Thailand for 17 years.

Before moving to Thailand, Flanagan was the director of Operations for Emser Tile & Natural Stone, where he managed all distribution operations nationwide. Flanagan’s other previous positions include associate director of Inventory Operations at Verizon Wireless and director of Inventory Control for eToys.com.

Flanagan’s military service was in the Marine Corps and Marine Corps Reserves, where he served in the Infantry, Reconnaissance and Force Reconnaissance. Flanagan was a distinguished graduate of the Amphibious Reconnaissance Course at Naval Air Base Coronado, California. He is also a graduate of U.S. Army Airborne School; U.S. Navy Dive School; U.S. Marine Corps Combat Diver Transition Course; U.S. Navy SERE School and the Los Angeles Police Department SWAT Operator Course. Flanagan also earned his U.S. Navy and Marine Corps Parachutist Badge. Additionally, Flanagan was selected 1st Marine Division NCO of the Quarter and the Force Reconnaissance Association’s 1996 Team Leader of the Year for Detachment 4th Force Reconnaissance Company.
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
DRS Technologies, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-14487, 333-69751 and 333-83700) on Form S-8 and in
the registration statement (No. 333-101315) on Form S-3 and in the registration statement (No. 333-112423) on Form S-4 of
DRS Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated June 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of DRS Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005
and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and comprehensive earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
March 31, 2005, and the related financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2005 and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2005, which reports appear in the March 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of DRS
Technologies, Inc.

Our
report dated June 9, 2005, on management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of March 31, 2005, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and our audit of internal control
over financial reporting of DRS Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries excluded an evaluation of internal control over financial reporting of Night Vision Equipment Co., Inc. and Excalibur Electro
Optics, Inc.

/s/KPMG LLP

Short
Hills, New Jersey
June 9, 2005

---



QuickLinks