alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2002 (the "Report") of Zenascent, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.



                           /s/ Cedric Kushner
                           --------------------------
                               Cedric Kushner, Chief Executive Officer


                          /s/ John Yeend
                          --------------------------
                              John Yeend, Chief Financial Officer



August 19, 2002
----------------
(Date)
No. 10-254.

#### United States, et al. ex rel. Mark Radcliffe, Petitioner v. Purdue Pharma L.P., et al.

562 U.S. 977, 131 S. Ct. 477,

178 L. Ed. 2d 315,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7874.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 600 F.3d 319.
# Warehousing Group chief selected as San Joaquin deputy commander

/ Published July 26, 2016
SAN JOAQUIN, California, 
Susan Earle has been selected as DLA Distribution San Joaquin deputy commander.

Earle has more than 38 years of experience in distribution with the Department of Defense, and is no stranger to DLA.  Prior to this assignment, Earle served as the distribution center’s Warehousing Group chief. 

During this time, Earle was responsible for 17 warehouses and outside storage lots, and a staff of nearly 300 employees engaged in receiving, stowing, picking, packing and shipping a wide range of material.  The Warehousing Group is responsible for over one million customer requisitions annually.

Her first Federal assignment was at McClellan Air Force Base, where she was a warehouse foreman.  When McClellan was put on the Base Realignment and Closure Act list, Earle went to work for DLA Distribution- then known as Defense Distribution Center in New Cumberland, Pa.- where she served on the Current Operations staff from 1999 to 2004.  Her next assignment was as deputy commander of DLA Distribution Puget Sound, Wash., from 2004 to 2010. 

She joined the management team at San Joaquin in 2010, and led plant optimization projects and storage optimization as deputy chief of the Material Management Group.

She completed her bachelor’s degree in Business Information Systems at the Sacramento Campus of the University of Phoenix in 1998.  In 2004, she was awarded the title of Military Packaging Professional by the Department of Defense School of Military Packaging Technology.  Earle has also participated in the Executive Development Program and has attended courses at Dartmouth, Pennsylvania State University, University of North Carolina and the Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

Her awards include many sustained superior achievement awards, two awards for Meritorious Civilian Service, a Humanitarian Service medal, a DLA Environmental Protection Award and a Department of Defense Meritorious Achievement Award.

Earle resides in Ripon, Calif., and is an active volunteer in police services for the Ripon Police Department, and a member of the Bishop’s Committee at St. Paul’s Episcopal Church, Modesto.
C:\PROGRA~1\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\5945290350065369621\09000064810d1ce4.docx 8/13/2012

GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 26
C:\PROGRA~1\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\5945290350065369621\09000064810d1ce4.docx 8/13/2012

GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 27
C:\PROGRA~1\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\5945290350065369621\09000064810d1ce4.docx 8/13/2012

GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 28
C:\PROGRA~1\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\5945290350065369621\09000064810d1ce4.docx 8/13/2012

GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 29
C:\PROGRA~1\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\5945290350065369621\09000064810d1ce4.docx 8/13/2012

GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 30
C:\PROGRA~1\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\5945290350065369621\09000064810d1ce4.docx 8/13/2012

GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 31
C:\PROGRA~1\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\5945290350065369621\09000064810d1ce4.docx 8/13/2012

GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 32
# C_2015221EN.01001001.xml

| 6.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Nutrexpa v OHIM — Kraft Foods Italia Intellectual Property (Cuétara Maria ORO)

(Case T-218/13) (1)

1

((Community mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Cuétara Maria ORO - Earlier Community and national figurative marks ORO - Partial refusal of registration - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 221/13)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nutrexpa, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Grau Mora, M. Ferrándiz Avendaño and Y. Sastre Canet, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño and V. Melgar, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Kraft Foods Italia Intellectual Property Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: A Masetti Zannini de Concina, M. Bucarelli and G. Petrocchi, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 February 2013 (case R 2455/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Kraft Foods Italia Intellectual Property Srl and Nutrexpa, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Disjoins Case T-218/13 from Case T-217/13 for the purpose of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Disjoins Case T-218/13 from Case T-217/13 for the purpose of the judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action;

| 3. | Orders Nutrexpa, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Nutrexpa, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17015]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive, Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (``CERCLA'')

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR Sec. 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. General 
Diesel, Inc., (D.S.C.) Civil Action No. 2 98-1595 23 was lodged on June 
2, 1998, with the United States District Court for the District of 
South Carolina.
    In this action the United States sought injunctive relief and 
recovery of response costs under Sections 106(a) and 107 of CERCLA, 32 
U.S.C. Secs. 9606(a) and 9607, with respect to the Koppers Charleston 
Superfund Site Site'') in Charleston, Charleston County, South 
Carolina.
    Under a proposed Consent Decree, General Diesel, Inc., has agreed 
to pay the sum of $500 in settlement of the government's claims under 
Sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 9606 and 9607, for 
existing contamination at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. General Diesel, Inc. (D.S.C.) and DOJ #90-11-2-1012A.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 1st Union Bldg, 1441 Main Street, Suite 500, 
Columbia, South Carolina 29201; the Region 4 Office of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, 61 Forsythe Street, Atlanta, Georgia 
30303, and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th 
Floor, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed 
consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW. 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. In 
requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $6.00 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-17015 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 20, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00499

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF LOUIS S. BERNAL , deceased,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- PC

- 0983

Honorable Kelly Cross, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellee’s brief is due on November 16, 2015. No further extension will be allowed.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of October, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17021]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice #2843]


Determination on Export-Import Bank Support for the Sale to 
Venezuela of Defense Articles or Services To Be Used Primarily for 
Counter-Narcotics Purposes

    Pursuant to section 2(b)(6) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, 
as amended, and Executive Order 11958 of January 18, 1977, as amended 
by Executive Order 12680 of July 5, 1989, I hereby determine that:
    (1) The defense articles and services for which the Government of 
Venezuela has requested Export-Import Bank financial guarantees, parts 
and services for the refurbishment of seventeen (17) OV-10 aircraft, 
are being sold primarily for anti-narcotics purposes;
    (2) the sale of such defense articles and services would be in the 
national interest of the United States;
    (3) The requirement for a determination that the Government of 
Venezuela has complied with all restrictions imposed by the United 
States on the end-use of defense articles or services for which the 
Export-Import Bank has provided guarantees or insurance under section 
2(b)(6) of the Export-Import Bank Act is inapplicable because the 
pending financing will be the first Ex-Im Bank transaction with 
Venezuela made under section 2(b)(6) of the Act;
    (4) the requirement for a determination that the Government of 
Venezuela has not used defense articles or services for which the 
Export-Import Bank has provided guarantees or insurance under section 
2(b)(6) of the Export-Import Bank Act to engage in a consistent pattern 
of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights is 
inapplicable because the pending transaction will be the first Ex-Im 
Bank transaction with Venezuela made under section 2(b)(6) of the Act.
    The determination shall be reported to Congress and shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 12, 1998.
Strobe Talbott,
Acting Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 98-17021 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-M
#### Denis Charmon, Appellant, v George Pavy et al., Defendants.

[59 NYS3d 435]

*494In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Wooten, J.), dated June 13, 2016, which denied his unopposed motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a default judgment upon the defendants’ failure to appear or answer the complaint.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting the words “as they have appeared in the action,” following the words “Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against defendants is denied,” and substituting therefor the words “with leave to renew on proper papers”; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A plaintiff seeking leave to enter a default judgment must file proof of proper service of the summons and the complaint, the defendant’s default, and the facts constituting the claim *(see*CPLR 3215 [f]; *Fried v Jacob Holding, Inc.,*110 AD3d 56, 59 [2013]). In this case, the Supreme Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for leave to enter a default judgment on the ground that the defendants “have appeared in the action.” However, the plaintiff established that the defendants had not timely appeared, and there is no evidence that the defendants had moved for, or were granted, leave to serve a late answer. Nevertheless, the plaintiff was not entitled to a default judgment because he failed to establish that he had “a viable cause of action” and, thus, the motion was properly denied *(Beaton v Transit Facility Corp.,*14AD3d 637, 637-638 [2005]; *see*CPLR 3215 [f]; *Roy v 81E98th KH Gym, LLC,*142 AD3d 985, 985-986 [2016]; *Chambliss v University Group Med. Assoc.,*137 AD3d 1183, 1184 [2016]; *Utak v Commerce Bank Inc.,*88 AD3d 522, 523 [2011]; *Cohen v Schupler,*51 AD3d 706, 706 [2008]; *Ritzer v 6 E. 43rd St. Corp.,*47 AD3d 464, 464 [2008]; *see generally Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp.,*100 NY2d 62, 70-71 [2003]). However, the plaintiff’s motion should have been denied with leave to renew upon proper papers *(see Dess v LRM Bldrs., LLC,*56AD3d 716, 717 [2008]; *Matone v Sycamore Realty Corp.,*31 AD3d 721, 721-722 [2006]; *Blam v Netcher,*17 AD3d 495, 496 [2005]).

Balkin, J.P., Roman, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Office ofthe Secretary U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C.

U.S. Department ofTransportation, Gill V. Rapoza 523 West Belford Road Imperial, Ca. 92251 Home 760-355-2712 Cell 760-562-1515 gvrapoza@hotmail.com May8, 2014

Regarding Essential Air Service for El Centro (Imperial CountyAirport) California, Order: Docket DOT-OST-2008-0299, servedApril 24, 2014, I am requesting thatyou waive the 10 enplanements per day for our airport. Ifyou look atthe three-year average instead ofa single year, itwould be more revealing. We had 9.5 enplanements for a single year, but have been over 10 on the three-year average. Consider that Imperial County California needs all ofthe resources that are available at this point in time. We are growing, but at the same we are at or very near the lowest employment rate in the nation. Good airport service is a boon to any economy. The ImperialValley has great potential for growth. Businesses are interested in what we have to offer. We have recently had major green energyprojects, wind and solar, come to Imperial County. And there are potential other projects being worked on. We are still in the running for the U.S. Navy's F-35 wing, which wouldbring in many supportpersonnel as well. I askthatyou consider the whole picture and extend Imperial County's Essential Air Service for at least anotheryear. Thankyou for your time and consideration. I am respectfully requesting a response. Sincerely,

Gill V. Rapoza
lb/unit lb/hr lb/day ton/year lb/hr lb/day ton/year lb/hr lb/day ton/year lb/

Drillship	Main	Propulsion	Electrical	Generator	Engines	and	Emergency	Generator

DR‐ME‐01	to	DR‐ME‐08	and	DR‐GE‐01 7197 28418 682033 66360 24578 589866 66360 25730 617516 66360 36

Emergency	Air	Compressor	 DR‐AC‐01 22 11 11 1.12 11 11 1.12 11 11 1.12 1Life	Boat	Diesel	Engines	no.	1	to	6 DR‐LB‐01	to	DR‐LB‐06 282 282 282 14.09 282 282 14.09 282 282 14.09 2Fast	Rescue	Craft DR‐FR‐01 63 63 63 3.15 63 63 3.15 63 63 3.15 6Dust	Collectors	no.	1	to	3 DR‐DC‐01	to	DR‐DC‐03 0 000000000Drill	Ship	Diesel		and	Jet	Fuel	Storage	Tanks DR‐FT‐01	to	DR‐FT‐18 0 000000000

Drillship	Fugitive	Emissions DR‐FE‐01 0 000000000Mud	Degasser	Vent DR‐VG‐01 135 135 3231 323 135 3231 323 135 3231 323 1Painting	(paint	+	thinner)	Operations DR‐PO‐01 0 000000000Welding	Operations DR‐WE‐01 0 000000000	EPA	Tier	II	Third	Party	Engines	≤	300	HP DR‐TP‐03 347 347 8337 834 347 8337 834 347 8337 834 3

EPA	Tier	II	Third	Party	Engines	≤	126	HP DR‐TP‐17 144 144 3463 346 144 3463 346 144 3463 346 1

Third	Party	Well	Evaluation	Engines	≤	140	HP DR‐TP‐12	to	DR‐TP‐16 802 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

	EPA	Tier	II	Third	Party	Engines	≤	300	HP DR‐TP‐04	and	DR‐TP‐05 695 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

	EPA	Tier	II	Third	Party	Engines	≤	126	HP DR‐TP‐18	and	DR‐TP‐19 289 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

	EPA	Tier	II	Third	Party	Engines	≤	300	HP DR‐TP‐06	and	DR‐TP‐07 695 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

	EPA	Tier	II	Third	Party	Engines	≤	126	HP DR‐TP‐20 144 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.44

	EPA	Tier	II	Third	Party	Engines	≤	126	HP DR‐TP‐21 144 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.44E+02 3.46E+03 3.46E+02 1.44

	EPA	Tier	II	Third	Party	Engines	≤	300	HP DR‐TP‐08	and	DR‐TP‐09 695 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.95

Flowback	Boiler DR‐TP‐22 164 1.31E+03 3.14E+04 9.42E+01 1.31E+03 3.14E+04 9.42E+01 000

Boom	Flare DR‐TP‐23 116963 2.92E+05 7.02E+06 2.11E+04 1.95E+05 4.68E+06 1.40E+04 000EPA	Tier	II	Third	Party	Engines	≤	860	HP DR‐TP‐01 985 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.85

EPA	Tier	II	Third	Party	Engines	≤	860	HP DR‐TP‐02 985 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.85

EPA	Tier	II	Third	Party	Engines	≤	300	HP DR‐TP‐10	and	DR‐TP‐11 695 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.95

Condensate	Tanks DR‐TP‐25	to	DR‐TP‐27 0 000000000Stimulation	Vessel	Engines Various 1394 000000 13069 313647 3293 Barges BG‐LP‐01	to	BG‐LP‐03 1567 0 0 0 1567 37602 3760 000

Tug	Boats

TG‐ME‐01	to	TG‐ME‐03	&	TG‐

GE‐01	to	TG‐GE‐02 1423 0 0 0 7411 177857 17786 000

Well	Evaluation	Vessel Various 1099 000000000

Supply	Boats Various 893 3720 89270 8927 3720 89270 8927 3720 89270 8927 74

325,989 7,823,725 96,758 233,657 5,607,759 111,286 42,653 1,023,664 78,903 44,

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation

GHG Emissions Matrix

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

EPN

Gas	Flowback Oil	Flowback Stimulation	Vessel 

GHG GHG GHG 

Third Party Engines

Total

Air Emission Sources

Drillship

Support Vessels

Anadarko	Petroleum	CorporationEGOM	Exploratory	Project	‐	Blackhawk 1	of	1
No. 12-401.

#### Kimberly-Clark Corp. et al. *v.*Alabama Department of Revenue.

Ct. Civ. App. Ala. Motions of Tax Executives Institute, Inc., and Council on State Taxation et al. for leave to file briefs as *amici curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16611]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION


Facility Visit

AGENCY: Postal Rate Commission.

ACTION: Notice of visit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Arrangements have been made for members of the Commission and 
certain advisory staff members to visit the World Headquarters and 
Technology Center of Pitney Bowes in Stamford, Connecticut. The purpose 
is to gain a better understanding of new and evolving technologies and 
their potential impact on the nature of the mailstream and postal 
operations. Information obtained during the visit will assist 
Commissioners and staff in the execution of their duties.

DATES: The tour is scheduled for Monday, July 20, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven L. Sharfman, General Counsel, (202) 789-6820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A report of the visit will be filed in the 
Commission's Docket Room.

(Authority: 39 U.S.C. 404(b), 3603, 3622-3624, 3661, 3662)

    Dated: June 17, 1998.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16611 Filed 6-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
No. 09-1380.

#### National Football League, et al., Petitioners v. Kevin Williams, et al.

562 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 566,

178 L. Ed. 2d 413,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8742.

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 582 F.3d 863.
# DLA Distribution Commander delivers National American Indian Heritage Month message

/ Published Nov. 8, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
November is National American Indian Heritage Month. This annual celebration is an opportunity for all of us to learn about and celebrate the rich history, culture, and contributions of Native Americans to our country. This year's theme is "Tribal Nations Soaring to New Heights." Throughout November, a variety of activities and resources will be available to promote a better understanding and appreciation of American Indian heritage.

To recognize and honor the significance of this month, please take a moment to read the attached newsletter created by DLA Distribution EEO. Additionally, I encourage everyone to participate in volunteer events that support organizations that work with American Indian communities, and perhaps share your stories if you have personal experiences, knowledge, or traditions related to American Indian heritage—your contribution will increase our understanding and appreciation.

As we participate in these activities, let us remember that National American Indian Heritage Month is not only about celebrating culture, but also about recognizing the challenges and issues that many American Indian communities still face today. By recognizing these challenges, we can work together to foster a more inclusive environment in our workplace and beyond. Together we can celebrate the diversity that makes our country stronger.

Thank you for your commitment to embracing the cultures and traditions that make our organization a diverse and vibrant workplace.

Mr. Knight and I would like to thank each and every one of you for your continued support to our Warfighters.
No. 10-5104.

#### William Tackett, Petitioner v. Ohio.

562 U.S. 904, 131 S. Ct. 242,

178 L. Ed. 2d 161,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6659.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.

Same case below, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1471, 921 N.E.2d 244.