alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Calendar No. 685

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2457

A BILL

For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 685

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2457

For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 23 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

Mr. DANFORTH (for himself and Mr. BOND) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, without amendment

A BILL

For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDING AND PURPOSE.

4 (a) FINDING.—The Congress finds that Benchmark

5 Rail Group, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, satisfactorily per6 formed emergency work after the Northridge earthquake,

7 but has not been reimbursed as a result of a technicality

8 under California State law.
2

•S 2457 RS

1 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to fairly

2 compensate Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., for the work for

3 which, except for the technicality under California State

4 law, it would otherwise have been paid under the provi5 sions of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emer6 gency Assistance Act.

7 SEC. 2. PAYMENT.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the

9 date of enactment of this Act, the director of the Federal

10 Emergency Management Agency shall pay to Benchmark

11 Rail Group, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, an amount equal

12 to the total amount owed to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.,

13 by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the

14 State of California to compensate Benchmark Rail Group,

15 Inc., for the emergency work and services performed at

16 the request of the Southern California Regional Rail Au17 thority, to the extent that such work and services are oth18 erwise eligible for reimbursement under the Robert T.

19 Stafford Disaster and Emergency Assistance Act. The

20 payment shall be made from funds appropriated to imple21 ment such Act.

22 (b) DEOBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—The Federal Emer23 gency Management Agency shall deobligate an equal

24 amount to that obligated previously for payment to the

25 State of California to cover the costs of work performed
3

•S 2457 RS

1 for the Southern California Regional Rail Authority by

2 Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., after the Northridge earth3 quake which would have been eligible for reimbursement

4 under such Act.
No. 09-10784.

#### Bryant Alexander Grover, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 852, 131 S. Ct. 108,

178 L. Ed. 2d 67,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6143,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# Bahrain’s Freeman-Irons promoted to Technical Sergeant

/ Published Feb. 29, 2016
MANAMA, Bahrain, 
On Feb. 7, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Bahrain’s Adreana Freeman-Irons pinned on the rank of Air Force Technical Sergeant. 
Hailing from Lima, Ohio, Freeman-Irons joined the Air Force in March 2008 with the intention to start a career, further her education and gain experience. She was able to complete the Community College of the Air Force in the top 1.6 percent of enlisted airmen with an Associate's Degree in logistics, materials and supply chain management. Additionally, she received her Bachelor of Science from DeVry University and a Masters of Business Administration from Walden University. 

Additionally, Freeman-Irons has teamed with 84 coalition nations and facilitated the distribution of 3 million maps, securing DLA’s “on time, every time” vision. She has also led three quarterly inventories, validating 8,000 line items and 72,000 classified products with zero errors.

“Tech. Sgt. Freeman-Irons' promotion clearly speaks to not only her endeavors with Air Force Materiel Command earlier in 2015, but her exceptional performance during her remote assignment in Bahrain as well. She's a top performer and most deserving of this rare opportunity,” said DLA Distribution Bahrain deputy commander, Paul McMillan.

Freeman-Irons continues working toward her goals to be accepted into the Air Force Wholesale Logistics Career Broadening program and to enroll in the Enlisted Joint Military Professional Education course. In her spare time, she likes to spend time with her husband and children, shop, coupon and read.
Following her time in Bahrain, Freeman-Irons will be heading to her next duty station in Arizona, Davis Monthan Air Force Base.
No. 09-11310.

#### Derrick Anthony Timmons, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 873, 131 S. Ct. 176,

178 L. Ed. 2d 106,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6914.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 437.
# Three Troop Support retirees honored for 97 total years of service 

/ Published Jan. 27, 2023
PHILADELPHIA
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support held a civilian retirement ceremony in honor of Raymond Hosey, Rhonda Marie Johnson, and Cesar Galvis Rodriguez on Jan. 26, 2023. 

“I am honored to officiate my second civilian retirement ceremony here at Troop Support,” said DLA Troop Support Deputy Commander Kishayra J. Lambert, who presided over the ceremony. “Celebrating the long-standing careers of three of Troop Support’s finest.” 

Hosey retired with 39 years of service, with his last position being at DLA Troop Support Europe and Africa as the customer facing division chief. “Not too bad for a South Philly with a public school education,” said Hosey. “I never thought that in 100 years, I would be here after my tumultuous start to life.” 

Hosey concluded the speech with a quote told to him by his mother, “No one owes you anything,” referring to the lesson that one must work hard to achieve things in life.       

Upon retirement, Hosey plans to write a book and do non-profit work.  

Johnson concluded her career with 37 years of service, ending as a business process analyst in the Business Systems Modernization office. 

She expressed her gratitude for all the support she received from her family coworkers and friends during her career. 

“Because of you, I can stand here today,” said Johnson. She went on to thank her supportive husband Allen, sister Melanie Williams, and  sisters of Delta Sigma Theta, Sorority, Inc. 

“Thank you for being by my side while I achieve my career goals,” said Johnson. 

Johnson plans to do a lot of travel, relaxing, and enjoying time with family. 

Rodriguez, who is ending his career as a procurement specialist in the Subsistence supply chain, was the final retiree of the day.  

He wrapped up his years of service by saying. “It felt like yesterday, but it was 21-years-ago when I came through the gate,” said Rodriguez. “I’ve learned many good things while at DLA and made good friends.” 

During his retirement years, Cesar plans to volunteer with youth and continue to exercise.  

Lambert reminded the retirees that Troop Support will always be their second family, and—through to their contributions—service members received crucial support through the work they have accomplished. 

“I am truly grateful, and I am not alone in my appreciation,” she said. “On behalf of myself, Brig. Gen. Shirley and the entire workforce, I wish you all the best life has to offer during your retirement.”
# C_2015346EN.01002001.xml

| 19.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Philips v Commission

(Case T-92/13) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market sharing, capacity and production - Single and continuous infringement - Imputability to a parent company of an infringement committed by a joint venture - Equal treatment - Method of calculating the fine - Taking into account the value of sales of cathode ray tubes through transformed products - Taking into account the average value of sales recorded during the infringement - Taking into account the overall turnover of the group - Proportionality - Duration of the administrative procedure))

(2015/C 346/22)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (represented by: J. de Pree and S. Molin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by C. Hödlmayr, M. Kellerbauer and P. Van Nuffel, subsequently by M. Kellerbauer, P. Van Nuffel and A. Biolan, and lastly by M. Kellerbauer, P. Van Nuffel and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2012) 8839 final of 5 December 2012 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.437 — TV and Computer Monitor Tubes) and, in the alternative, annulment or reduction of the fines imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.

1

---
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-113094 on Form S-8 and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 333-113094 on Form S-8 of our report dated October 10, 2005,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of Bioenvision, Inc. and
subsidiaries appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bioenvision, Inc.
for the year ended June 30, 2005.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
October 12, 2005
# San Joaquin achieves positive results during recent DoD IG Audit

/ Published June 24, 2015
SAN JOAQUIN, California, 
The DLA Distribution San Joaquin, Calif., team is doing their part in helping DLA remain on track to comply with DoD Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness, or FIAR, guidance. The team successfully completed their DoD Inspector General Audit, which focused on substantive testing on the Plan to Stock business cycle and San Joaquin’s inventory profile.  
The three-day audit began June 1 with San Joaquin showing positive results in each of the FIAR categories of Existence, Completeness, and Rights and Obligations.

Existence: Recorded transactions and events occurred during the given period, are properly classified, and pertain to the entity. An entity’s assets, liabilities, and net position exist at a given date. This was evaluated through the Book-to-Floor process in inventory. During this process, 111 locations were sampled.

Completeness: All transactions and events that should have been recorded are recorded in the proper period. All assets, liabilities, and net position that should have been recorded have been recorded in the proper period and properly included in the financial statements. This was evaluated through the Floor-to-Book process in inventory. In this area of evaluation, 55 locations were sampled.

Rights and Obligations: The entity holds or controls the rights to assets, and liabilities are the obligations of the entity at a given date. This was evaluated through examining evidentiary matter for 51 samples.

“This audit was successful through a team effort with DLA Distribution headquarters and the DLA Distribution San Joaquin team. I appreciate the long hours and employees following their job breakdown sheets to a tee,” said San Joaquin commander Marine Col. Keith Reventlow. “I appreciate what everyone has done in this round, but this is the first step in a long process.”  

According to the DoD IG Audit team, they plan to evaluate these areas among the other distribution centers across the DLA Distribution enterprise, and will give an overall assessment and recommendation on whether the vendor/service-managed inventory is ready for an Independent Public Accountant audit in 2016.

The next step for the DLA Distribution San Joaquin team is to continue refining their business cycle processes and associated job breakdown sheets.  “Strict adherence to the JBS is the key to not only passing an audit but in providing the best support to the warfighter while proving to the American public that we are good stewards of the taxpayer’s dollars,” said Reventlow.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60188

Summary Calendar

__________________

APOLO ROGELIO FLORES-CASTILLO,

 Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

 Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

A70-001-624

- - - - - - - - - -

December 1, 1995

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is an appeal from the Board of Immigration Appeals'

(BIA) order dismissing appellant's petition for asylum and

withholding of deportation. He urges that he is entitled to

asylum or, alternatively, the case should be remanded to the BIA

so that he may present his petition with the assistance of

counsel. He requests that the court consider additional
No. 95-60188

-2-

evidence which he did not submit during his deportation

proceedings. 

This court's review is limited evidence included in the

administrative record. Miranda-Lores v. INS, 17 F.3d 84, 85 (5th

Cir. 1994). We have reviewed that record and the BIA's opinion

and find no error. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a); Jukic v. INS, 40 F.3d

747, 749 (5th Cir. 1994). The appellant has failed to

demonstrate that remand is required in this case. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2347(c). If the appellant wishes to reopen his deportation

proceeding, he should file with the BIA a motion to reopen the

deportation proceedings for the submission of new evidence. 

Faddoul v. INS, 37 F.3d 185, 190 (5th Cir. 1994); Pritchett v.

INS, 993 F.2d 80, 83 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 345

(1993). 

DENIED.
No. 10-6348.

#### Greg Caldwell, Cleophas James Hall, Joseph J. Hall, and David Lee Hall, Petitioners v. United States.

562 U.S. 974, 131 S. Ct. 492,

178 L. Ed. 2d 311,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7893.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 933.
Exhibit No. 99.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark S. Newman, Chief Executive Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

/s/
MARK S. NEWMAN

---

Mark S. Newman Chief Executive OfficerJune 24, 2003

A
SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

---
No. 10-301.

#### Anascape, Ltd., Petitioner v. Nintendo of America, Inc.

562 U.S. 1004, 131 S. Ct. 520,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8467.

178 L. Ed. 2d 373,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 601 F.3d 1333.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                       141
<INVENTORY>                                      1,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,535
<PP&E>                                          20,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,205
<BONDS>                                          3,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,284
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,963
<CGS>                                            6,557
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (110)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    686
<INCOME-TAX>                                       265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                421
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        


</TABLE>
No. 09-11314.

#### Grover Reed, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 873, 131 S. Ct. 177,

178 L. Ed. 2d 106,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6682.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 593 F.3d 1217.
No. 10-221.

#### John Duffie, et ux., Petitioners v. United States.

562 U.S. 897, 131 S. Ct. 355,

178 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6269.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 600 F.3d 362.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.9

                                STATE OF DELAWARE

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                         OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              VERIDIEN CORPORATION


Veridien Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Veridien Corporation a
resolution was duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the
Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for
consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as
follows:

                  RESOLVED, that Section 1 (only) of Article FOURTH of the
Company's Certificate of Incorporation be and hereby is amended to read as
follows:

                  FOURTH. Section 1. The total number of shares of all classes
         of stock which the corporation shall have authority to issue is Three
         Hundred Twenty-five Million (325,000,000) shares.

                  The corporation shall have authority to issue two (2) classes
         of stock. Three Hundred Million (300,000,000) shares shall be common
         stock, having a par value of $ .001 (hereinafter referred to as "Common
         Stock") and Twenty-five Million (25,000,000) shares shall be preferred
         stock issuable in series and having a par value of $ .001 (hereinafter
         referred to as "Preferred Stock").


SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, an
Annual Meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held,
on March 6, 2002, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number
of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provision of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

FOURTH: That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under or by
reason of said amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Veridien Corporation has caused this certificate to be
signed by Sheldon C. Fenton an Authorized Officer this 27th day of May, 2002.


                                       By: /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Sheldon C. Fenton
                                           President & C.E.O.
#### Com. v. McKinley

12/01/2015

386 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 102
#### People v Lebron

1st Dept: 143 AD3d 535

denied*
Exhibit No. 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark S. Newman, Chief Executive Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|/s/MARK S. NEWMANMark S. Newman
Chief Executive Officer
July 9, 2004 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DRS
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamal Stephenson, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 750]

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 16, 1996 *(People v Stephenson,*234 AD2d 486 [1996]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 3, 1995.

*886Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.