alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w3



 








Exhibit 10.3




THIRD AMENDMENT

TO THE

RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION

2005 EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN




     This Third Amendment to the Range Resources Corporation 2005 Equity-Based Compensation Plan
(the “Plan”) is effective as provided herein and is made by Range Resources Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”):



     WHEREAS, the Company has established the Plan in order to attract able persons to serve as
directors or to enter the employ of the Company and its affiliates, and to provide a means whereby
those individuals upon whom the responsibilities of the successful administration and management of
the Company rest, and whose present and potential contributions to the welfare of the Company and
its affiliates are of importance, can acquire and maintain stock ownership thereby strengthening
their concern for the welfare of the Company and its affiliates and, further, to provide such
individuals with additional incentive and reward opportunities designed to enhance the profitable
growth of the Company and its affiliates;



     WHEREAS, an increase in the aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be used in connection
with the Plan must be approved by the stockholders of the Company, pursuant to Section 10(c) of the
Plan and section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;



     WHEREAS, this Third Amendment is subject to stockholder approval.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as provided herein, effective as of May 24, 2006, provided
that the terms of this Third Amendment are approved by the Company’s stockholders, and, except as
provided below, the Plan shall continue to read in its current state:




Section 4(a) of the 2005 Equity-Based Compensation Plan will be amended to read in its
entirety as follows:



     4. Stock Subject to Plan.




          (a) Overall Number of Shares Available for Delivery. Subject to
adjustment in a manner consistent with any adjustment made pursuant to Section 9,
the total number of shares of Stock reserved and available for delivery in
connection with Awards under this Plan shall not exceed the sum of (i) 2,075,000
shares (the “162(m) Covered Shares”), plus (ii) 13,875,000 shares of Stock, less
(iii) the number of shares of Stock issued under the Range Resources Corporation
1999 Stock Option Plan (the “1999 Plan”) prior to the Effective Date and less the
number of shares of Stock issuable pursuant to awards outstanding under the 1999
Plan as of the Effective Date, plus (iv) the number of shares that become available
for delivery under the 1999 Plan after the Effective Date with respect to awards
that lapse or are terminated and with respect to which shares are not issued.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, a duly authorized officer of the Company has executed this Third Amendment
as set forth below.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	RANGE RESOURCES CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Rodney L. Waller
 

	 

	 	Name:
	 	Rodney L. Waller
 

	 

	 	Title:
	 	Senior Vice President

 

	 

	 	Date:
	 	May 24, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Scott R. Martin, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 393]

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered December 10, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted sodomy in the first degree.

In satisfaction of a seven-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted sodomy in the first degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 12 years and five years of postrelease supervision. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. We disagree. Our review of the record, defense counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submission reveals the existence of potential nonfrivolous issues of “arguable merit” *(People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]), including whether defendant was properly sentenced as a second felony offender given the terms of the plea agreement. Accordingly, defense counsel’s application to be relieved is granted and new counsel will be assigned to address any issues which the record may disclose *(see People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]; *People v Cruwys, supra).*

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries of Constar International Inc.



|                                              |  |                              
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                                          |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|BFF Inc.                                      |  | Delaware                     
|                                              | 
|Constar Ambalaj Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S.        |  | Turkey                       
|                                              | 
|Constar Foreign Holdings, Inc.                |  | Delaware                     
|                                              | 
|Constar, Inc.                                 |  | Pennsylvania                 
|                                              | 
|Constar International Holland (Plastics) B.V. |  | The Netherlands              
|                                              | 
|Constar International UK Limited              |  | United Kingdom               
|                                              | 
|Constar Plastics of Italy S.R.L.              |  | Italy                        
|                                              | 
|DT, Inc.                                      |  | Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,925
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,099
<INVENTORY>                                     26,624
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,226
<PP&E>                                          36,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,076
<BONDS>                                        228,990
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,414
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                   (180,631)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,443
<SALES>                                         26,384
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,384
<CGS>                                           18,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (596)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,071)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,071)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-6131.

#### Tony Terrell Moses, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 945, 131 S. Ct. 370,

178 L. Ed. 2d 240,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7677.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 380 Fed. Appx. 844.
# DLA Distribution Europe participates in German Air Force induction effort

/ Published Dec. 22, 2022
GERMERSHEIM, Germany, 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Europe participated in the oath of service ceremony for nearly 600 recruits in the Luftwaffe German Air Force, Dec. 1. DDDE Deputy Commander, Neil Flanagan and Chief of Support Services, Martin Mendel attended the event as distinguished guests. The soldiers belong to the Air Force Training Battalion in Germersheim, Germany, as well as the Air Force officers' school in Fürstenfeldbruck, Bavaria. The oath of service is a hallowed event in the Bundeswehr, German Armed Forces.

The event took place on Domplatz Square in front of the historic Speyer Cathedral, founded in 1030 and currently a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization world heritage site.“The ceremony is a sign of the Bundeswehr's solidarity with the region,” said Nicole Steingaß, state secretary in the Interior Ministry of Rhineland-Palatinate.

                Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Europe participated in the oath of service ceremony for nearly 600 recruits in the Luftwaffe German Air Force, Dec. 1, 2022, on Domplatz Square in front of the historic Speyer Cathedral.                            DLA Distribution Europe participates in German Air Force induction effort                            Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Europe participated in the oath of service ceremony for nearly 600 recruits in the Luftwaffe German Air Force, Dec. 1, 2022, on Domplatz Square in front of the historic Speyer Cathedral.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Distribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 221201-D-D0441-6214

In addition to the recruits and distinguished guests, several thousand spectators witnessed the event in spite of the cold weather. The ceremony in Speyer was the first since 2017, with a previous event canceled due to COVID.

The Luftwaffe Training Battalion is situated adjacent to the Germersheim Army Depot. Successive DDDE commanders have maintained a cordial relationship with the commander of the unit. Recently, DDDE Commander, Army Lt. Col. Kimberly Rembert, hosted the current Luftwaffe Commander, Lt. Col. Christoph Kuck, for coffee and a tour of the facility.

“It was a privilege for our team to attend such a momentous event, and DDDE plans to engage further with our Bundeswehr partners now that COVID restrictions are lifting locally,” said Rembert.

                Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Europe participated in the oath of service ceremony for nearly 600 recruits in the Luftwaffe German Air Force, Dec. 1, 2022.                            DLA Distribution Europe participates in German Air Force induction effort                            Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Europe participated in the oath of service ceremony for nearly 600 recruits in the Luftwaffe German Air Force, Dec. 1, 2022.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Distribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 221201-D-D0441-6135
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2536

To encourage the furnishing of health care services to low-income individuals

by exempting health care professionals from liability for negligence for

health care services provided without charge, except in cases of gross

negligence or willful misconduct, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. DANFORTH (for himself, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, and Mr. DOMENICI)

introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

A BILL

To encourage the furnishing of health care services to lowincome individuals by exempting health care professionals

from liability for negligence for health care services provided without charge, except in cases of gross negligence

or willful misconduct, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Charitable Medical

5 Care Act of 1994’’.
2

•S 2536 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS

2 FROM NEGLIGENCE LIABILITY IN THE PROVI3 SION OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES WITHOUT

4 CHARGE.

5 (a) LIMITED LIABILITY.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), a

7 health care professional who is licensed or certified

8 to furnish health care services by the appropriate

9 authorities for practice in a State shall not be liable

10 for any civil damages for any act or omission result11 ing from the rendering of a health care service de12 scribed in paragraph (2) unless the act or omission

13 was the result of gross negligence or willful mis14 conduct.

15 (2) HEALTH CARE SERVICE DESCRIBED.—A

16 health care service described in this paragraph is a

17 health care service voluntarily rendered by a health

18 care professional—

19 (A) within the scope of the health care pro20 fessional’s license or certification; and

21 (B) without charge to the recipient of such

22 service (or any health insurance plan or pro23 gram under which the recipient is covered).

24 (b) REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO FURNISHING THE

25 SERVICE.—Subsection (a)(1) shall apply only if a health

26 care professional before furnishing a health care service—
3

•S 2536 IS

1 (1) agrees to furnish the health care service vol2 untarily and without charge to the recipient of such

3 service (or any health insurance plan or program

4 under which the recipient is covered); and

5 (2) provides the recipient of the health care

6 service with adequate notice as determined by the

7 Secretary of HHS of the health care professional’s

8 limited liability with respect to the service.

9 (c) PREEMPTION.—The provisions of this section

10 shall preempt any State law to the extent such law is in11 consistent with such provisions. The provisions of this sec12 tion shall not preempt any State law that provides greater

13 incentives or protections to a health care professional ren14 dering a health care service described in subsection (a)(2).

15 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply with

16 respect to health care services furnished on or after the

17 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Order entered January 30, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00102-CV

IN RE CATHERINE HAYNES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-12828

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
# DLA participates in U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka Safety Fair

/ Published Dec. 2, 2021
CAMP HUMPHREYS, South Korea, 
Members from Defense Logistics Agency Indo-Pacific and DLA Distribution Yokosuka participated in the U.S. Fleet Activities Yokosuka Safety Fair Nov. 15 at Naval Base Yokosuka, Japan. The public event was sponsored by various commands and the local Japanese police department. 

The fair focused on preventing driving under the influence and mishaps. Handouts were provided on traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety. A “drunk goggles” booth allowed participants to simulate the effects of alcohol consumption on the body. Various sets of goggles were available representing increasing levels of intoxication from blood alcohol concentration of 0.02 to 0.25. After donning the goggles, visitors attempted to catch tennis balls, walk heel-to-toe in a straight line and ride a tricycle through a winding course. Performing the tasks was a struggle even for those with the lowest level of impairment. 

DLA Indo-Pacific Safety Specialist Camilla Lawson, Navy Logistics Specialist Petty Officer 2nd Class Junjian Guan, Navy Logistics Specialist Petty Officer 1st Class Daniel Marvin and Navy Logistics Specialist Petty Officer 2nd Class Jian Yong Liu manned the DLA booth during the fair.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2040

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for assignment of employees

of federally funded research and development centers and Federal employees between Federal agencies and federally funded research and

development centers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 21 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. CRAIG,

Mr. SASSER, and Mr. MATHEWS) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for assignment of employees of federally funded research and development centers and Federal employees between Federal agencies and federally funded research and development centers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ASSIGNMENTS OF EMPLOYEES BETWEEN FED4 ERAL AGENCIES AND FEDERALLY FUNDED

5 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS.

6 (a) AUTHORITY.—Section 3371(4) of title 5, United

7 States Code, is amended—
2

•S 2040 IS

1 (1) by striking out ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara2 graph (B);

3 (2) by striking out the period at the end of sub4 paragraph (C) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘; or’’;

5 and

6 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub7 paragraph:

8 ‘‘(D) a federally funded research and de9 velopment center.’’.

10 (b) PROVISIONS GOVERNING ASSIGNMENTS.—Sec11 tion 3372 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by

12 adding at the end the following new subsection:

13 ‘‘(e) Under regulations prescribed pursuant to section

14 3376 of this title—

15 ‘‘(1) an assignment of an employee of a Federal

16 agency to an other organization, and an employee so

17 assigned, shall be treated in the same way as an as18 signment of an employee of a Federal agency to a

19 State or local government, and an employee so as20 signed, is treated under the provisions of this sub21 chapter governing an assignment of an employee of

22 a Federal agency to a State or local government;

23 and

24 ‘‘(2) an assignment of an employee of an other

25 organization to a Federal agency, and an employee
3

•S 2040 IS

1 so assigned, shall be treated in the same way as an

2 assignment of an employee of a State or local gov3 ernment to a Federal agency, and an employee so

4 assigned, is treated under the provisions of this sub5 chapter governing an assignment of an employee of

6 a State or local government to a Federal agency.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT  32.1


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of NeWave, Inc., a Utah corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Annual  Report  for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-KSB") of
the  Company  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-KSB  fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  the  Company.



Date:  April  14,  2005



/s/  Michael  Hill
----------------------
Michael  Hill
Chief  Executive  Officer
Director



Date:  April  14,  2005


/s/  Barrett  Evans
------------------------
Barrett  Evans
Chief  Financial  Officer
Principal  Financial  Officer
Principal  Accounting  Officer
Director
DLA Disposition Services training helps improve care of veterans
 By Jeff Landenberger
  Recently members of the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services’ Equal Employment Opportunity team provided training to the local Veterans Affairs Medical Center for 25 staff members. **Angela Tabron of DLA Disposition Services Equal Employment Opportunity office delivers training at the Battle Creek, Michigan, Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The class was a joint effort between the two federal agencies.




A woman stands behind a podium looking at a seated man who is one of her students in a training class.
        EEO training at Battle Creek VA medical
            Angela Tabron of DLA Disposition Services Equal Employment Opportunity office delivers training at the Battle Creek, Michigan, Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The class was a joint effort between the two federal agencies.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Jeff Landenberger
                    
                    VIRIN: 210413-D-YU183-005**“I am very excited to have a team from DLA Disposition Services here,” said Stephen Karanja, EEO manager for the Battle Creek VA Medical Center.  ‘By having this team building training which going to improve the care that we provide to veterans it makes it all come together when we work together and make a better country and better nation.” DLA team member Stacy Marsala provided 4 Lenses training. The program is a personality assessment analysis that helps organizations build on an individual’s natural talents. Additional training included EEO Multigenerational presented by DLA’s Angela Tabron. Al Hight, Disposition Services’ EEO director, said this was not only a great opportunity for the VA to get the needed training but for his team to reach out to other federal agencies in the area and create partnerships.