alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 1- 14 -000685- CR In the Court of Appeals For the First District of Texas At Houston

 No. 1408986 In the 262nd Judicial District Court Of Harris County, Texas

 KANAVIUS DORS EY , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee

 ST ATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

 TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

THE STATE OF TEXAS, pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2 & 10.5, moves for

an extension of time in which to file its appellate brief and in its motion, would

show the Court the following:

1. The appellant was charged with aggravated robbery (CR.-17). A jury

convicted appellant of the charged offense (CR 141-142). An agreement

was reached between appellant and the State regarding punishment and

the court sentenced appellant to 20 years confinement in the Institutional

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (CR.-5). Appellant

filed notice of appeal (CR. -145). ACCEPTED 01-14-00685-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/15/2015 12:59:37 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2. The State’s brief wa s due April 13 , 2015. The State hereby requests a n

extension for the filing of th e State’s brief until May 13 , 2015

.

3. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for a n extension

of time to allow the State to file its brief :

The State has been working on and has filed the following briefs in the last thirty days.

Ex Parte McGuire 14

- 14

- 01010

- CR State’s Brief filed March 1 6 , 2015

Le v. State 14

- 14

- 00043

- CR State’s Brief filed March 24, 2015

Efran Lopez 14

- 14

- 007 58

- CR State’s Brief filed April 8, 2015

Allen v State 14

- 14

- 00842

- CR State’s Brief due April 8, 2015

Furthermore , the undersigned attorney has been assigned the following briefs in addition to the brief in this cause number

.

Jackson v. State, 14

- 14

- 00472

- CR State’s Brief due April 27, 2015

Moreno v. State 14

- 14

- 00455

- CR State ’ s Brief due April 27, 30254. This is the State’s second request for an extension of time to file its brief.

WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant the requested

extension.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kimberly Stelter K IMBERLY S TELTER Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002

- 1923 (713) 755

- 5826 Stelter_Kimberly @dao.hctx.net TBC No. 19141400CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument will be served by efile.txcourts.gov to:

Mandy Miller Attorney at Law 2910 Commercial Center Blvd., Ste. 103

- 201 Katy , Texas 77 494 mandy@mandymillerlegal.com

/s/ Kimberly Stelter
K IMBERLY S TELTER Assistant District Attorney Harris County, Texas 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002

- 1923 (713) 755

- 5826

April 15, 2015
2017-0323.

#### Pleatman v. Sibcy Cline, Inc.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-160447 and C-160460, 2016-Ohio-7683. Appellants’ motion to consolidate denied.

Fischer and DeWine, JJ., not participating.
No. 09-10607.

#### Stacey Jones, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 847, 131 S. Ct. 93,

178 L. Ed. 2d 58,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5829.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*59Same case below, 596 F.3d 273.
#### People v Jones (Gary)

2d Dept: 139 AD3d 880 (Queens)

denied 8/1/16 (Rivera, J.)
No. 10-6320.

#### Jeffrey Thomas Harmon, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 974, 131 S. Ct. 490,

178 L. Ed. 2d 310,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7923.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 607 F.3d 233.
Exhibit 32.1



Statement Pursuant to Section 1350(a) of title 18, United States Code



The undersigned, Richard F. Zannino and William B. Plummer, certify that:



|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. (the Company) for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-K), which is being filed today with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| |  |                          
| |  | -------------------------
| |  | /s/ Richard F. Zannino   
| |  | Richard F. Zannino       
| |  | Chief Executive Officer, 
| |  | Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
| |  | Dated: February 28, 2007 
| |  |                          
| |  |                          
| |  | /s/ William B. Plummer   
| |  | William B. Plummer       
| |  | Chief Financial Officer, 
| |  | Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
| |  | Dated: February 28, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nelson Figueroa, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 540]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), entered on or about September 10, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reducing the classification to that of a level two offender, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

As the People apparently concede, the record does not support the court’s point assessments for use of a dangerous instrument and for multiple victims. Accordingly, defendant’s correct point score is 100, which supports a level two adjudication. We reject the People’s request for an upward departure, as the aggravating factors they cite have either been adequately taken into account by the guidelines or are insufficiently indicative of sexual recidivism.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Kapnick, Web-ber, Oing and Singh, JJ.
# Prepare to return to the office in the new year

/ Published Dec. 22, 2023
FORT BELVOIR,Va., 
As the Defense Logistics Agency gets ready to return to the office more regularly in January, employees can start preparing now so they are set up for success in the new year.

DLA published a series of articles discussing several important return to office topics including:
      - EEO offers training, tips for returning to the office : Returning to the office more frequently is a change of pace for some, but there are resources available to make this change easier for the individual, as well as topics to keep in mind to make things more comfortable for everyone in the office.
      - DLA’s Human Resources team is ready to support employees returning to the office : A willingness to help others is a common trait across the DLA workforce. At one point or another, we have gone out of our way to assist a coworker, a neighbor, or someone we just met who needed momentary help or advice. But how often do we accept help when we need it?
      - Employees encouraged to revisit safety, security measures when returning to the office : Returning to the McNamara Headquarters Complex means employees have several office environment issues to consider, including safety and security.
      - Employees encouraged to assess workspaces before January : Defense Logistics Agency Information Operations encourages the workforce, especially those who have not been at their workspaces for an extended time, to evaluate their office workspace before Jan. 2.
      - DLA Installation Management answers questions about parking, food, more : Coming back to the McNamara Headquarters Complex three days a week has employees asking many questions. One such question might be the first thing an employee does upon arriving to work: “Will I be able to find a parking space?”

There is also an in-depth video interview with DLA Vice Director Brad Bunn in which he discusses the changes to the agency’s telework policy.

More articles with information from DLA Intelligence and other areas will be published in the new year.

Stay tuned to DLA’s social media pages, where we will ask the workforce for opinions and advice about coming back to the office. Please note that the best and most insightful comments may be used in a follow-up article.
No. 09-11108.

#### Andre Williams, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 862, 131 S. Ct. 143,

178 L. Ed. 2d 85,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6349,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# C_2015034EN.01004702.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/47

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 December 2014 — DE v EMA

(Case F-103/13) (1)

1

((Civil service - Member of the temporary staff of EMA - Evaluation report - Application for annulment - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Infringement of procedural rules - None))

(2015/C 034/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DE (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: S. Marino, T. Jabłoński and N. Rampal Olmedo, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the applicant’s performance evaluation report in respect of the period from 15 September 2010 to 15 September 2012.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Declares that DE is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay those incurred by the European Medicines Agency. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Declares that DE is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay those incurred by the European Medicines Agency.

---

(1)  OJ C 367, 14.12.2013, p. 41.

1

---
# DLA foreign policy advisor visits DLA Distribution Headquarters

/ Published July 19, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Defense Logistics Agency Foreign Policy Advisor Gregory Winstead made a brief visit to DLA Distribution Headquarters, June 28.

As a foreign policy advisor (referred to as POLAD), Winstead provides expertise and advice to senior, strategic level military and civilian leaders within DLA.

The POLAD’s visit included a general command overview and concluded with a tour of The Eastern Distribution Center, which is the largest distribution processing facility in the Defense Department, spanning 1.7 million square feet. He was brought up to speed on the center’s modernization efforts and all its recent technological renovations.

Winstead is a former DLA Energy direct delivery contract specialist who changed careers and joined the U.S. Department of State in 2000 as a career foreign service officer and later became a member of the Senior Foreign Service. During his diplomatic career, he held consular, economic and political team leadership assignments in Central Asia, Europe, the Middle East and in Washington headquarters postings.

                Defense Logistics Agency Foreign Policy Advisor, Gregory Winstead, left, speaks with DLA Distribution Modernization Project Manager, Timothy Kosky durning his tour of The Eastern Distribution Center, Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, June 28, 2023.                            DLA foreign policy advisor visits DLA Distribution Headquarters                            Defense Logistics Agency Foreign Policy Advisor, Gregory Winstead, left, speaks with DLA Distribution Modernization Project Manager, Timothy Kosky durning his tour of The Eastern Distribution Center, Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, June 28, 2023.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Alvin WilliamsVIRIN: 230628-D-BU818-0021
No. 09-11327.

#### Emmanuel Constant, aka Toto Constant, Petitioner v. Jane Doe 1, et al.

562 U.S. 951, 131 S. Ct. 179,

178 L. Ed. 2d 249,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7680.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of respondents to seal the petition for writ of certiorari and to substitute a redacted version for the public record granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 543.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2588 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 

conduct a study on the effects of oxybenzone and octinoxate on the 

environment and public health, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2019 

Ms. GABBARD (for herself and Mr. RYAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 

to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a study on the effects of 

oxybenzone and octinoxate on the environment and public 

health, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Oxybenzone and 

5 Octinoxate Impact Study Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2588 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF OXYBENZONE AND 

2 OCTINOXATE ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND 

3 PUBLIC HEALTH. 

4 (a) STUDY.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the 

6 Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in 

7 this section as the ‘‘Administrator’’) shall conduct a 

8 study on the impact of oxybenzone and octinoxate 

9 on— 

10 (A) the environment, including lethal and 

11 sublethal impacts on aquatic ecosystems; and 

12 (B) public health. 

13 (2) INCLUSION.—The study under paragraph 

14 (1) shall include analysis, documentation, and deter15 minations on the impact of oxybenzone and 

16 octinoxate on the protection and propagation of— 

17 (A) coral reefs; and 

18 (B) marine life. 

19 (3) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the study 

20 under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall consult 

21 with— 

22 (A) marine biology research centers located 

23 in the United States on the shores of large bod24 ies of water; and 

25 (B) the Director of the Centers for Disease 

26 Control and Prevention. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2588 IH

1 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

2 date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall sub3 mit to Congress and make publicly available on the website 

4 of the Environmental Protection Agency a report that de5 scribes the results of the study conducted under subsection 

6 (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2014078EN.01000203.xml

| 15.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/2

---

Action brought on 4 December 2013 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-640/13)

2014/C 78/04

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, W. Roels, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that by retroactively curtailing the right of taxpayers to recover tax which was levied contrary to Union law, the United Kingdom has failed to comply with its obligations under Article 4(3) TEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that by retroactively curtailing the right of taxpayers to recover tax which was levied contrary to Union law, the United Kingdom has failed to comply with its obligations under Article 4(3) TEU;

| — | order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

The national legislation in issue

The national legislation in issue

Section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 retroactively deprives taxpayers of the right to recover unlawfully charged tax.

The main argument

The main argument

In the absence of any provision of EU law on the matter, it is for the national law of each Member State to determine the procedural conditions governing actions to vindicate the rights enjoyed by citizens under EU law. However, that procedural autonomy is subject to observance of the principles of effectiveness and equivalence and to other generally applicable principles of law, such as legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations. Section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 fails to observe those principles and is thus incompatible with Article 4(3) TEU.

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33915-33916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16471]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Intent To Grant an Exclusive Patent License

    Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, code of Federal 
Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, the Department of the 
Air Force announces its intention to grant Beam Tech Corporation 
(hereafter Beam Tech), a Texas Corporation, an exclusive license under: 
United States Patent Application Serial No. 08/933,561 filed in the 
names of Jill E. Parker, John L. Alls, and Johnathan L. Kiel on 
September 19, 1997 for a ``Diazodenitrification in Manufacture of 
Recombinant Bacterial Biosensors.''
    The license described above will be granted unless an objection 
thereto, together with a request for an opportunity to be heard, if 
desired, is received in writing by the addressee set forth below within 
sixty (60) days from

[[Page 33916]]

the date of publication of this Notice. Information concerning the 
application may be obtained, on request, from the same addressee.
    All communications concerning this Notice should be sent to: Mr. 
Randy Heald, Senior Intellectual Property Counsel, Secretary of the Air 
Force, Office of the General Counsel, SAF/GCQ, 1501 Wilson Blvd., Suite 
805, Arlington, VA 22209-2403, Telephone (703) 696-9037.
Barbara A. Carmichael,
Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-16471 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

FIDELITY BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Exhibit 27 - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          42,420
<SECURITIES>                                   132,064
<RECEIVABLES>                                  663,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,263
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          26,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 873,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          791,839
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           675
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   873,562
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,116
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   164
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,112
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,562
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,550
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,550
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        


</TABLE>
No. 10-5455.

#### Michael A. Evans, Petitioner v. Okaloosa County, Florida, et al.

562 U.S. 922, 131 S. Ct. 302,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7208.

178 L. Ed. 2d 196,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
1 

### Sutton, Tia

From: Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:13 PM To: Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov; Chad_S_Whiteman@om b.eop.gov Cc: james.tamm@dot.gov; Sutton, Tia; Hengst, Benjamin; Spears, Matthew Subject: FW: HD FE GHG Phase 2 - RIA COMPARE to 060415 - SEC OND HALF Ch 05-13 Attachments: Ch 05 Emission Impacts - Compare.docx; Ch 06 Health and Environmental Impacts - Compare.docx; Ch 07 Vehicle Program Costs - Compare .docx; Ch 08 Economic and Other Impacts - Compare.docx; Ch 09 Safety Impacts - Compare.docx; Ch 10 CAFE Model - Compare.docx; Ch 11 Results of Preferred an d Alternative Standards - Compare.docx; Ch 12 Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis - Compare.docx; Ch 13 Natural Gas Vehicles and Engines - Compare.docx

Importance: High



### Good afternoon, Attached please find the second half of the redline d RIA, which shows changes relative to the June 4, 2015 versions that were sent to OIRA on June 5, 2015. Because of the large file size, could you please confirm that you have received this? Thanks, Tim
**Exhibit
      32(a)**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of ALLTEL Corporation (the
      Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott
      T.
      Ford, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;


and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of


operations
      of the Company.








/s/
      Scott T. Ford


Scott
      T.
      Ford


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


August 8,
      2007



































A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      ALLTEL Corporation and will be retained by ALLTEL Corporation and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.