alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Kenneth D. Lynch, Also Known as Kenneth Lynch, Deceased. Karen Cullin, Appellant; Keith Lynch et al., Respondents.

[55 NYS3d 909]

In a contested probate proceeding, the objectant appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (McCarty III, S.), dated June 29, 2015, which denied her motion, inter alia, for leave to renew her prior motion for summary judgment on her objections and to deny admission of the decedent’s will to probate, and granted the respondents’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the objections and for admission of the will to probate.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

“It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal” *(Wen Zong Yu v Hua Fan,*65 AD3d 1335, 1335 [2009]; *see LaSalle Bank N.A. v Henderson,*69 AD3d 679, 680 [2010]; *Matter of Remy v Mitchell,*60 AD3d 860 [2009]). An appellant’s record must contain all of the relevant papers submitted on the underlying motion *(see*CPLR 5526; *Wen Zong Yu v Hua Fan,*65 AD3d at 1335; *Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg,*39 AD3d 689 [2007]; *see also Matter of Coopersmith,*48 AD3d 562 [2008]).

Here, the record assembled on appeal does not include, inter alia, several exhibits that were submitted in support of the respondents’ cross motion for summary judgment. As those exhibits are relevant to the appellant’s contentions on appeal, the record is inadequate to enable this Court to render an informed decision on the merits, and consequently the appeal must be dismissed *(see Block 6222 Constr. Corp. v Sobhani,*84 AD3d 1292 [2011]; *Emco Tech Constr. Corp. v Pilavas,*68 AD3d 918, 918-919 [2009]; *Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Vargas,*288 AD2d 309, 310 [2001]).

We decline the respondent’s request to impose sanctions on the appellant *(see generally Swartz v Swartz,*145 AD3d 818, 831 [2016]).

Dillon, J.R, Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2155 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2155

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the 
 cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at 
 Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2155

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the 
 cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at 
 Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory 
Authorization Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. FOREST ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY.

    (a) In General.--Subject to the availability of funds appropriated 
under subsection (c), the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the 
Cooperative State Research Service, shall provide the Federal share of 
the cost of planning and constructing a Forest Ecosystem Research 
Laboratory at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share provided under subsection (a) 
shall be 50 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

            Passed the Senate June 29 (legislative day, June 7), 1994.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.

S 680 ES----2
S 680 ES----3
S 680 ES----4
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Threemile Area Timber Sales and Other Projects, Colville National 
Forest, Pend Oreille County, Washington

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Cancellation of an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 18, 1990, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an 
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Threemile Area Timber 
Sales and Other Projects on the Sullivan Lake Ranger District of the 
Colville National Forest was published in the Federal Register (55 FR 
1687). A Notice of Availability for the draft EIS was published in the 
Federal Register on August 14, 1992 (57 FR 36647). The comment period 
on the draft EIS ended October 1, 1992. Forest Service has decided to 
cancel the environmental analysis process. There will be no final EIS 
for this project at this time. The NOI is hereby rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
cancellation to Connie Smith, Environmental Coordinator, Colville 
National Forest, 765 South Main, Colville, Washington 99114 or 
telephone 509-684-7185.

    Dated: January 8, 1998.
Robert L. Vaught,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 98-1602 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### Com. v. Fells

04/20/2016

013 WAL (2013)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 654
# C_2014052EN.01005301.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/53

---

Action brought on 29 November 2013 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission

(Case F-114/13)

2014/C 52/102

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: A. Salerno and B. Cortese, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Appointing Authority refusing to recognise the legal validity of the decision of the local Staff Committee in Luxembourg revoking the authority granted to a representative to represent it within the Commission’s Central Staff Committee.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority refusing to recognise the legal validity of the decision of the local Staff Committee in Luxembourg revoking the authority granted to a representative to represent it within the Commission’s Central Staff Committee; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority refusing to recognise the legal validity of the decision of the local Staff Committee in Luxembourg revoking the authority granted to a representative to represent it within the Commission’s Central Staff Committee;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### People v Blanding

1st Dept: 139 AD3d 641 (NY)

denied 8/25/16 (DiFiore, Ch. J.)
# President surprises DLA employee’s parents

/ Published May 19, 2015
HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah, Defense Logistics Agency Document Services
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Beachum, Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 264]

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.), rendered June 26, 2014, as amended December 13, 2016, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was properly adjudicated a second felony offender based upon a New Jersey drug conviction. The court properly consulted the accusatory instrument *(see People v Jurgins,*26 NY3d 607, 613-614 [2015]), which established that the predicate crime involved possession with intent to distribute heroin *(see People v Santiago,*143 AD3d 545 [1st Dept 2016], *lv denied*28 NY3d 1127 [2016]; *People v West,*58 AD3d 483 [1st Dept 2009], *lv denied*12 NY3d 822 [2009]). We decline to revisit our prior holdings on this issue.

Concur — Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
No. 09-1209.

#### Leo Tsimmer, Petitioner v. Andrea Quarantillo, New York District Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.

562 U.S. 828, 131 S. Ct. 73,

178 L. Ed. 2d 25,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6125.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 661.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from consolidated financial statements found on the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, September 30, 2000, and is qualified in
Its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      574
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            10,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 98
<INVENTORY>                                              13,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         27,011
<PP&E>                                                   17,594
<DEPRECIATION>                                            8,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           43,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    12,179
<BONDS>                                                  13,148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                    107
<OTHER-SE>                                               18,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             43,975
<SALES>                                                  39,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         39,979
<CGS>                                                    32,964
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            32,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             (1)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        1,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (3,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (1,292)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (1,937)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (1,937)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.18)


</TABLE>
Dor-oST-idoo-07-^2 

<^ 

(^^^ O 7:x>^^-r7Q -^^W ^ ^''^' 

/^^ y 77 ^ ^^ ^ p^>e^ 5S45 ^ TT/^T^ — 

'^eM-''*^
# Resource analysts from near and far host a landmark summit

/ Published Feb. 9, 2024
BATTL CREEK, Mich., 
Within the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center, resource analysts from across Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services gathered for a three-day summit. Each region was represented in Battle Creek, Michigan, to discuss topics ranging from contract requirements to training.

Funds and Agreements Branch Chief Brittany Bristow – the primary organizer of the event – explained the main purpose of the summit is to bring together all of the RA’s and walk through specific trainings and conversations that truly benefitted the audience.

“Resource analysts are the cog that make the agency work,” said Bristow. “They aren’t the boots on the ground receiving property, but they are the ones ensuring that we are paying our bills at the sites we’re located at. That we are making necessary purchases, and making sure we have contracts in place to have material handling equipment maintained.”

Money is a necessity for all organizations and Disposition Services is no different and senior leaders expressed how each member of the audience has a hand in ensuring the agency’s success.

“If you don’t manage your money you’re going to fail as an organization,” said DLA Disposition Services Director Mike Cannon. “We understand as an organization that operations don’t just drive finances but [rather] finances enable operations.”

Cannon also underscored the important role resource analysts play in managing the day-to-day finances and minimizing the agency’s duplicate charges and excessive or unnecessary expenditures. For example, through management of MHE contracts, RA’s managed to save over a million dollars.

Over the course of the three days there were individual briefings, breakout sessions and interactive exercises designed to not only educate their ranks but also to stress the impact they have around the world.

“How well we do our job is predicated on you,” said DLA Disposition Services Chief of Staff Pete Foreman. “I want to stress how extremely important you are because you’re that first line of defense that measures ‘was this a valid cost?’. You’re very important, and you make this organization go and you are what make the mission happen.”

This was the first time nearly every RA in the agency gathered for a summit, , and while many of them have performed their duties for extended periods of time, others are relatively new to the financial arena.

“All of this is all new to me,” said Heath Bushwell, deputy director to the Mid America region. “So this was a great opportunity for me to start seeing what billing officials and RA’s see so that I can learn it and be able to make more informed decisions. This was definitely a very positive event for me to attend.”

As the event concluded Bristow went on to say the goal is to continue hosting the summit into the future – either as an annual or bi-annual event.
# Employee Spotlight: Scott Stapleton

/ Published June 30, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs.*

**Name:** Scott Stapleton

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City

**Years of service:** 14 years

**What is your job title and what do you do specifically?** I am a lead sustainment specialist. In this capacity, I help them learn the computer system processes such as the enterprise business system, and coach them in resolving issues. I also pull status reports to monitor our section’s progress and build data bases that are sent out to our customers to assist them in forecasting the items they need.

**What do you like most about your job and why?** I enjoy working with various weapon systems from a vantage point where I get to see more of the big picture. When issues surface, it helps me determine what can be done to resolve them. I also continue to learn at my job which keeps me from falling into a rut.

**What are your best practices for achieving goals or accomplishing tasks?** I approach every task believing that any action is better than no action and every mistake is a learning experience. Also, I’m not afraid to ask questions since that is how you learn.  

**Have you had a mentor that helped you grow in your career?  If so who, and how did they help?** I believe everyone I know is a mentor. My mindset is that you can learn something from everyone because they have different experiences to share. If you won’t listen, you are limiting your own knowledge.

**If you could pick a personal motto, what would it be and why?**My motto is to learn something new every day. You never know what information will be useful in the future.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?**I enjoy racing four-wheeled all-terrain vehicles and dirt bikes. When I’m not working on my dirt bikes or racing four wheelers, I also like repairing cars. I’m currently rebuilding a 1946 Ford truck.
# Employee Spotlight: Arthur Ford

/ Published April 1, 2024
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Employee Spotlight focuses on outstanding nonsupervisory Defense Logistics Agency personnel across DLA Aviation and at Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may nominate employees to be featured in this column by contacting DLA Aviation Public Affairs at*Avn.PAO@DLA.mil

**Name:** Arthur Ford

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City

**Years of service at DLA:** 16 years

**What is your job title, and what do you do specifically?**I am customer support specialist, and my job is to represent DLA Aviation as a single face to the industrial customer. I ensure the timely processing of customer orders so that the customer has access to the material and account and order information.

**How do you support the warfighter?** I support the warfighter by keeping communication open and keeping their parts moving. This is done by monitoring the materiel and providing our customers with the most up-to-date status items needed. As an example, I brief an  Air Force director in the 546th Propulsion Maintenance Squadron at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, regarding our Depot Repair Enhancement Program (DREP), where we address the health of national stock numbers on back order that have the potential to cause delays or work stoppages. At the DREP, we’re able to get in front of the problem and find possible workarounds before a backorder stops an engine being built.

**What do you like most about your job, and why?** I enjoy talking face-to-face with our customers when they need answers or information about their parts. This interaction, over time, builds their trust and confidence in me.

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?**No lipstick here – what we tell you is the coldhearted truth!

**Professionally, where do you see yourself five years from now?** I’ll be retired and look forward to not waking to an alarm clock! Eventually, I will volunteer at my church with programs that run during working days or wherever needed.

W**hat is your favorite military aircraft? Why?**The Air Force E-3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) is my favorite. While in the Air Force, I was the AWACS crew chief for 11 years out of 20, starting at Kadena Air Base in Japan from 1885-1989 and then here at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma from 1997-2005.

**What’s the most thrilling/adventurous thing you have ever done?**When I turned 50, I started cycling, and it’s been a joy, from casual rides to main cycling events here in Oklahoma. So far, my longest distance on a bike is 50 miles at the Dehydrator in Duncan. I also usually ride in May’s Valley Rally event in Paul Valley. I’m riding in the 2024 Red Bud Classic in Oklahoma City this year. But my favorite is the Chickasha bike ride because it combines a block party with cycling, hosting roughly 30 food trucks and entertainment.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Stephen H. Hollis, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Double Eagle PetroleumCo.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: March 31, 2005 /s/ Stephen H. HollisStephen H. Hollis, Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey M. Cavins,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the date of the financial statements contained therein.

         /s/ Jeffrey M. Cavins
-------------------------------------
Jeffrey M. Cavins
Chief Executive Officer and President
August 31, 2004
No. 12-6169.

#### Maehr *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.