alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Malik B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 270]

Appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Amanda E. White, J.), dated July 7, 2016. The order of disposition, insofar as appealed from, adjudicated Malik B. a juvenile delinquent. The appeal from the order of disposition brings up for review an order of fact-finding of that court dated April 20, *8432016, which, after a hearing, found that Malik B. committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

“The evidence supporting a fact-finding in a juvenile delinquency proceeding is legally sufficient if, viewing that evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency, any rational trier of fact could have found the appellant’s commission of all the elements of the charged crimes beyond a reasonable doubt” *(Matter of Danielle B.,*94 AD3d 757, 758 [2012]; *see Matter of Chakelton M.,*111 AD3d 732, 733 [2013]; *Matter of Imani Mc.,*78 AD3d 705, 706 [2010]). The test is no different when the evidence supporting the fact-finding is circumstantial *(see Matter of Chakelton M.,*111 AD3d at 733). Here, viewing the. evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency, it was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of grand larceny in the fourth degree, robbery in the third degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree *(see Matter of Brandon V.,*133 AD3d 769, 769 [2015]; *Matter of Dashawn R.,*120 AD3d 1250, 1251 [2014]; *Matter of Ellius R.,*97 AD3d 586, 587 [2012]; *People v Carr-El,*287 AD2d 731, 732 [2001], *affd*99 NY2d 546 [2002]). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see *Matter of Brandon V.,*133 AD3d at 769; *Matter of Dashawn R.,*120 AD3d at 1251; *Matter of Kaseem R.,*113 AD3d 779, 780 [2014]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see Matter of Dajahn M.,*110 AD3d 812, 813 [2013]; *Matter of Danielle B.,*94 AD3d at 758; *Matter of Jamel C.,*92 AD3d 782, 782-783 [2012]; *Matter of Kalexis R.,*85 AD3d 927, 928-929 [2011]). The Family Court’s credibility determinations should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see Matter of Brandon V.,*133 AD3d at 769; *Matter of Darnell G.,*125 AD3d 969, 969 [2015]; *Matter of Dashawn R.,*120 AD3d at 1251). Upon reviewing the record, we are satisfied that the fact-finding determination of the Family Court was not against the weight of the evidence.

Dillon, J.P., Austin, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
# Europe Warehousing Team named one of best in DLA

/ Published March 7, 2016
GERMERSHEIM, Germany, 
DLA Director Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch has announced the DLA Distribution Europe Warehousing Division Team as the winner of the DLA Strategic Goals Award for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 in the Warfighter First category.
The 62-member team, led by DLA Distribution Europe commander Army Lt. Col. Krista Hoffman, is diverse, comprised of 26 civilians and 36 local national employees from seven different countries.   

Supporting the “Warfighter First” concept, which focuses on the delivery of innovative and responsive solutions to Warfighters first, DoD components, and other valued customers, the team brought in leaders from U.S. Army Europe, or USAREUR, and Army Materiel Command, and collaboratively developed solutions for these customers as they wrestled with how to best stand up and provide long-term support to the European Activity Set, a heavy brigade equipment set for CONUS-based rotational units to use in Europe with NATO allies.  

DLA Distribution Europe established and presented a plan on how the organization could provide a quicker response time to meet USAREUR’s needs at a better value than other logistics agencies in theater.  To date, the team has provided unmatched mission readiness to DoD forces partnering with NATO Allies in the Baltics, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, and, most recently, Ukraine.  

As word of the team’s success spread, the group was called upon to stand up the first-ever Army Global Combat Support System to manage critical non-DLA Army repair parts that had previously kept major combat systems down for extended periods of time.  To support this mission, the team built and currently maintains more than 900 line items and has improved the readiness of the EAS by an estimated 65 percent, according to USAREUR maintenance managers.  

Increasing its level of support to Whole of Government, the distribution center’s Warehousing Division was sought out by the Department of State’s U.S. Consulate in Frankfurt, Germany, to provide storage and care of stock in storage solutions for its fleet of “fly-away” contingency motor vehicles.  DLA Distribution Europe currently stores, inventories, fuels, and exercises a growing fleet of vehicles critical to embassy operations throughout Europe, Africa, and the Middle East.  

"I am tremendously proud of our Warehousing Division.  Their ability to provide the best support possible at the best value is evident by the additional work our customers are bringing to DLA.  They are truly deserving of this award!" said Hoffman.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED 12/31/97 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,814
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,970)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,973
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,810
<PP&E>                                             952
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (142)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,886
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,568
<COMMON>                                            95
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,909
<SALES>                                         33,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,608
<CGS>                                           32,868
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,346)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,346)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,346)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.32)


</TABLE>
No. 10-6246.

#### Ahmad Ibrahim, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 972, 131 S. Ct. 486,

178 L. Ed. 2d 307,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8088.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 242.
# Old furniture gets new life helping less fortunate

/ Published July 12, 2016
Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, 
Hundreds of pieces of used barracks furniture will be offered to those in need instead of lying in a landfill thanks to the teamwork between the Defense Logistics Agency, Marine Corps Base Hawaii and a local charity.

Partnering with the Marine Corps, the staff at the DLA Disposition Services site at Pearl Harbor was able to provide 407 pieces of barracks furniture no longer needed by the base to Helping Hands Hawaii. The DLA employees coordinated with the General Services Administration for permission to donate the items to the charity in lieu of disposing of the items as waste. The furniture included a wide variety of items such as bed frames, sofas, hutches, chairs, desks, and tables.

“It felt great knowing that the ... furniture would be put to good use instead of being disposed of in a landfill,” said Karen Balabis, Marine Corps Base Hawaii’s solid waste/spill response coordinator. “Russell, from Helping Hands, was very appreciative of the furniture that we were donating and he thanked us many times as the truck was being loaded.” 

Property Disposal Specialist Gilbert Delagente said the DLA staff also found it “gratifying” that so much furniture could be reused “to help our ... homeless and the less fortunate people in Hawaii.” He added that the staff hopes it will have the opportunity to make more donations like this one in the future. 

Maria Vuong with Helping Hands Hawaii’s Community Clearinghouse said the furniture received is great and mentioned that some of the single arm chairs have gone to the charity’s Housing First program that helps house the chronically homeless while sofa bed couches have gone to families that either had no beds or were sleeping on the floor.

“We are looking to our partners to help place the bed frames as well as the secretaries, since school will be starting soon,” Vuong said. “Hopefully, our families who access our warehouse can use those desks. Again thank you for being so flexible with this donation!”
# Susquehanna celebrates new building with a ribbon cutting 

/ Published Nov. 30, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Defense Distribution Susquehanna, Pa., celebrated the opening of their newest warehouse, Building 780, with a ribbon cutting ceremony at 10 a.m. on Nov. 16. Robert Montefour, site director for Defense Logistics Agency Installation Support at Defense Distribution Susquehanna opened the ceremony with a few words before introducing Army Col. Corey A. New, commander DLA Distribution Susquehanna.

The new state of the art, general purpose warehouse, constructed by Carothers Construction, Inc., provides more than 200,000 square feet of climate controlled storage for both bulk and high rack storage. There are bays to store accountable and high value items, ensuring all safety and security requirements are met. Employee quality of life was taken into consideration during the design process with locker areas, modern bathrooms, break rooms and shelter areas being high priority.

“This has been a long hard process, with an incredible effort to get everything complete,” said Montefour. “This day has been a long time coming.”

The new warehouse is a significant step in the ongoing modernization of the Defense Distribution Susquehanna installation, as the one building replaced two World War I storage facilities that are currently being demolished.

“I am even more positive that in about 50 years, there will be someone else doing the same thing that we are doing today because of the importance in our mission to our customers across the globe,” said New.

Following New’s remarks, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District deputy district engineer, Army Lt. Col. Michael S. Ruppert took the podium to say a few words on behalf of the Corps of Engineers.

“For every project, large or small, the Corps is a team of teams, and this project is a superb example of that reality. I am confident that excellent coordination between the project stakeholders including DLA Distribution, Defense Distribution Susquehanna officials, the Corps, and Carothers Construction have made this project a success,” explained Ruppert.

Finally, New, Ruppert and Montefour were joined by Ernie Blatincz, superintendent and site safety for Carothers Construction, Inc., Rene Vinette, deputy chief of special commodities, Vicki Orris, Building 780 manager and Todd Hurst, supervisory supply technician to officially cut the ribbon.
#### People v Briggs

3d Dept: 138 AD3d 1355 (Schenectady)

denied 8/2/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
No. D-2567.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Sigmund Victor Mazur.

562 U.S. 817, 131 S. Ct. 410,

178 L. Ed. 2d 274,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7635.

October 4, 2010.

Sigmund Victor Mazur, of Hyde Park, New York, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16907]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Export Administration (BXA).
    Title: Export of Parcels Through the Postal Service.
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0694-0095.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection of 
information.
    Burden: 11,332 hours.
    Average Time Per Response: 5 seconds.
    Number of Respondents: 8,000,000 respondents.
    Needs and Uses: Exporters are required to use the information as an 
adjunct to completion of their Shipper's Export Declarations (SED). The 
information provided is the declaration to the Government that the 
shipment is allowed and is used for enforcement purposes. The United 
States Postal Service (USPS) reviews the information collected to help 
assure compliance with the Export Administration Act and Regulations 
all the way through USPS processing of the parcel to the foreign 
destination.
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit 
institutions.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Victoria Baecher-Wassmer (202) 395-5871.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Victoria Baecher-Wassmer, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New 
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 98-16907 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1707]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a consent decree in United States v. A. Steiert & 
Sons, Inc., Civ. A. No. 98-0104, was lodged on January 9, 1998, with 
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 
Pennsylvania. The consent decree resolves the claims of the United 
States under Sections 106(a), 107(a), and 113(g)(2) of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 
as amended (``CERCLA''), for reimbursement of response costs incurred 
at the North Penn Area 2 Superfund Site located in Hatfield Township, 
Montgomery County, Pennsylvania and for declaratory judgment as to 
liability that will be binding in actions to recover further response 
costs related to the Site. The consent decree obligates A. Steiert & 
Sons, Inc. to pay $58,000 in reimbursement of response costs incurred 
and to be incurred by EPA in responding to contamination at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. A. Steiert & Sons, Inc., DOJ Ref. # 90-11-3-805A.
    The consent decree may be examined at the office of the United 
States Attorney, 616 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106; 
the Region III Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 841 
Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA; and at the Consent Decree Library, 
1120 G Street, NW 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A 
copy of the consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW, 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case 
and enclose a check in the amount of $7.00 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost), payable to the Consent Decree library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-1707 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
# San Diego mock audit yields promising results

/ Published Aug. 19, 2016
SAN DIEGO, Pennsylvania, 
As practice for advanced stages of its current Independent Public Accountant audit, DLA Distribution San Diego, Calif., put itself to the test, conducting its own mock audit in late July to ensure its processes are repeatable and sustainable.

At both its San Diego and North Island locations, the distribution center conducted a mock audit of policies and procedures administered by service provider Team Olgoonik to ensure accurate processes are being conducted per contract and Standard Operating Procedures.

The DLA Distribution Headquarters Audit Readiness Team was on hand to administer the audit and gauge the distribution center’s adherence to standards and ability to pass any operational/financial audits by external organizations.  

DLA Distribution San Diego is one of many DLA Distribution sites currently undergoing an IPA audit as part of the legal mandate that the Department of Defense be fully auditable by 2017.  DLA voluntarily accelerated that goal, and announced it was ready for audit last year.  

Currently, the distribution center is undergoing the Statements for Standards for Attestation Engagements 16 portion of the audit, which will confirm or deny the establishment of control objectives and effectively designed control activities within the organization.

According to DLA Distribution San Diego, Calif., commander Navy Capt. John Soracco, the mock audit validated the team’s self-assessment, Corrective Action Plan efforts and training to date on SOPs.

“We are on the right track.  There were no surprises in terms of our self-assessment.  We know our operation,” said Soracco.
S91G0737.

#### HARRIS v. THE STATE.

(405 SE2d 482)

Weltner, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review Division 5 of the Court of Ap*387peals’ opinion in *Harris v. State,*198 Ga. App. 503 (402 SE2d 62) (1991). The Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not err in admitting testimony by a physician in a child molestation case that he had an opinion, based upon a physical examination, as to whether the victim had been molested sexually.

Decided July 1, 1991.

*Hudson & Solomon, James D. Hudson,*for appellant.

*Robert B. Ellis, Jr., District Attorney, Timothy L. Eidson, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

This issue is controlled by *Allison v. State,*256 Ga. 851, 853 (353 SE2d 805) (1987). The testimony being inadmissible, it should have been excluded.

*Judgment reversed and case remanded.*

*All the Justices concur, except Clarke, C. J., Hunt and Fletcher, JJ., who dissent.*

Hunt, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent to *Allison v. State,*256 Ga. 851, 854 (353 SE2d 805) (1987). That is, the expert’s opinion — that the victim in this case had been sexually molested — is admissible under the opinion of a majority of this court in *State v. Butler,*256 Ga. 448 (349 SE2d 684) (1986). Moreover, as noted by the Court of Appeals, unlike *Allison v. State,*where the expert, a clinical psychologist, gave his opinion based on the child abuse accommodation syndrome, the expert here, a physician, based his opinion on his physical examination of the victim.

By its reliance on *Allison,*the majority would permit the doctor in this case to opine that his findings from the physical examination he conducted were *consistent*with those he would expect to find in a child who had been molested. *Allison,*supra at 853 (par. 6). Such testimony would, according to *Allison,*aid the jury in arriving at its *own*decision whether the child was, or was not, molested. On the other hand, it is the view of the majority that for this doctor to say “my findings indicate the child was molested” as opposed to “my findings are consistent with molestation and inconsistent with anything else,” would not only improperly invade the jury’s province but would be an error of such magnitude as to require reversal. We did not penalize the state for such a semantical distinction in *Butler,*and should not do so here. I would affirm the Court of Appeals and the conviction.

I am authorized to state that Chief Justice Clarke and Justice Fletcher join this dissent.
No. D-2570.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of William Anthony Helm.

562 U.S. 818, 131 S. Ct. 411,

178 L. Ed. 2d 274,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7559.

October 4, 2010.

William Anthony Helm, of Bartlett, Tennessee, is sus*275pended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 09-1398.

#### William B. Trescott, Petitioner v. Federal Highway Administration, et al.

562 U.S. 832, 131 S. Ct. 109,

178 L. Ed. 2d 31,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6325.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.