alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-1534.

#### Hector Rafael Vendrell, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 839, 131 S. Ct. 188,

178 L. Ed. 2d 43,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5791.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. D-2518.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Thomas M. Finneran.

562 U.S. 811, 131 S. Ct. 401,

178 L. Ed. 2d 266,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7537.

October 4, 2010.

Thomas M. Finneran, of Dorchester, Massachusetts, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
# Plan ahead, have an emergency supply kit when disaster strikes

/ Published April 28, 2021
Richmond, Va., 
The time disaster meets you at your front door is not the time to find out you don’t have adequate supplies to make it through the disaster.  Start building your emergency disaster plan and survival supplies kit now.

“If you already have a survival plan and kit, it may be time to take another look at it to possibly add new supplies, based on the recent pandemic, or replace outdated or expired items,” said Michael Gaines, a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosives operations specialist with Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond’s Security and Emergency Services.

Here are a few tips to help keep you safe, whether you’re at home, at work or in your car.

##### **What Goes in Your Kit**

While there are basic items every survival kit should have, keep individual needs in mind to add to the kit.  To get an idea of some basic survival kit items, visit Ready.gov’s link on building a kit.  

##### **Maintain Your Kit**

After assembling your kit, remember to maintain it so it’s ready when needed.  Keep canned food in a cool, dry place, store boxed food in tightly closed plastic or metal containers and replace expired items as needed.  Re-think your needs every year and update your kit as necessary.

##### **Kit Storage Locations**

Since you do not know where you will be when an emergency occurs, prepare supplies for your home, work and cars.

Keep home kits in a designated place and ready in case you have to leave your home quickly. Make sure all family members know where they are kept. Gaines urges employees to pack two days’ worth of clothing and remember the needs of your pets when packing your kit.

For work kits, he said you should have enough supplies to be prepared to shelter at work for at least 24 hours. This kit should include food, water and other necessities like medicines, as well as comfortable walking shoes, stored in a “grab and go” case.  

Lastly, in case you are stranded in your car, Gaines recommends keeping a kit of emergency supplies to include thermal blankets and a tool to break the glass in car windows.

Remember, surviving an emergency does not start once the emergency strikes.  Surviving disaster starts with planning how to survive.  Get your survival kit ready, NOW!
# DLA Energy pre-proposal conference addresses new tool, requirements for suppliers

/ Published May 4, 2015
SPRINGFIELD, Virginia,
##### 



CERTIFICATION
OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2007 of AMERIGROUP Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this
report;3.
    
    [Omitted].4.
    
    [Omitted].5.
    
    [Omitted].
 Paragraphs 3 through 5, omitted here, are included in Exhibit 31.2 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q filed by AMERIGROUP Corporation on November 2, 2007.
 Date:
    
    December 21, 2007
    
    
    
    /S/ JAMES W. TRUESSJames W. TruessExecutive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
### Request for Information DVer se Corporation (FAA-2015-4906) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Armstead: This letter is to inform you that the following inform ation is missing from your peti tion (Docket No. FAA-2015-4906). This information is necessary for the Federal Av iation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Op erations Manual (MPTOM) wh ich is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your inte ntion by the requested response date listed below. Please submit the additional informati on (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, plea se also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comm ent tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we mu st receive the information described above by January 25, 2016. If we do not receive the information, we wi ll close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions, please feelfree to contact me at (202) 267-2999. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : Monday , January 11, 2016 12:25 PM To: armsteadalex@gmail.com
No. 09-11388.

#### Robert J. Wright, Petitioner v. William Pollard, Warden.

562 U.S. 877, 131 S. Ct. 190,

178 L. Ed. 2d 114,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7037.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
# ‘Process Excellence:’ March/April Loglines available

/ Published March 8, 2016
      - How Enterprise Process Management aligns DLA’s internal processes with customers’ needs and shows employees how their work contributes to the agency’s overarching mission.
      - How DLA employees can help the agency mitigate risk by keeping the big picture in mind,
      - Metrics and how DLA officials will soon begin measuring how well the agency meets customers’ needs by using existing data to establish baseline goals for time, cost and performance.
      - With DLA ready for an audit this year, agency planners are looking forward to the next phase in the agency’s progression: fine tuning its end-to-end processes.
      - The Defense Logistics Agency is embracing change through a rejuvenated continuous process improvement program which encourages its employees to submit ideas to improve the process activities they participate in.
      - Resiliency and how DLA employees can take advantage of a range of programs to assist with life’s challenges.

This issue also includes a question-and-answer column with Marcus Bowers, director of DLA Strategic Plans and Policy, and a history piece detailing World War II Logistics Lessons.Printed copies of Loglines are available throughout DLA’s locations and a digital copy of the magazine is also available. There is also a video detailing the issue. To subscribe to Loglines, email loglines@dla.mil.
No. 09-11454.

#### Marcel L. Brown, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 881, 131 S. Ct. 202,

178 L. Ed. 2d 121,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6522.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 277.
#### People v James

1st Dept: 146 AD3d 574 (Bronx)

denied 3/31/17 (Fahey, J.)
No. 10-5523.

#### Lonnie Williams, Petitioner v. Unknown Jones, et al.

562 U.S. 927, 131 S. Ct. 313,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7291.

178 L. Ed. 2d 204,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WILLIE JAMES BILLUE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1667 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 8, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge. Willie James Billue, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-04-00668- CR

K e nne th G e ne Bur ns, App e lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF MILAM COUNTY , 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR20,692 , HO NORAB LE ED MAGRE, JUDGE PRESI DING

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant Ke nneth Gene Bur ns pleade d g uilty

to se xu a ll y

a s s aulting a

child. SeeT e x. Pe n. Cod e Ann. § 22. 01 1 (We st Supp . 200 4- 05 ). Th e c ourt a dju dg e d h im guil ty

and se nte nc e d h im to ten y ear s in prison.

Bur ns’s court- appointed attorne y filed a brief concluding that the appe al is frivolous and without mer it. The brief meets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by pr e s e n t i n ga

p r o f e s s i o n a l e v a l u at i o no f

th e r e c o r d

d e m o n s tr at i n gw h y

th e r e ar e n o a rg uable g rounds to be adva

nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 48 8 U .S. 75 (1 98 8) ; Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W .2d 80 7 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 51 6 S.W. 2d 68 4 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 74 ); Jack son v. Sta te , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). B urns re ceive d a copy of counse l’s brief a

nd was a dvised of his right t o examine the appellate rec ord and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed.2 We have r eviewe d the re cord a nd counsel’s br ief a

nd ag ree that the a

p p e a l is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appe al. Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

_____________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P ury ear and Pember

ton Affir med Filed: Mar ch 10, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh
#### G. R. Ferlita, *Appellant,*vs. Paola Figarrota, Philipo Lodato, and Jim Lodato, co-partners trading under the firm name of Florida Macaroni Company, *Appellees.*

145 So. 607.

Division B.

Decision filed December 30, 1932.

*490
      *T. B. CastegUa*and *E. B. Drumright,*for Appellant;

*Thomas Palmer,*for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and upon briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in said decree appealed from. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by this Court that the stay order applied- for be denied, and the decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. For the proceedings to which this subsequently instituted chancery case relates, see Ferlita vs. Figarotta (opinion filed this Term, August 24, 1932), 106 Fla. 578, 145 Sou. Rep. 605.

‘Stay order denied. Decree appealed from affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Teeeell and Davis, J.J., concur.
No. 09-10504.

#### Janice L. Schrader, Petitioner v. New Mexico, et al.

562 U.S. 823, 131 S. Ct. 382,

178 L. Ed. 2d 17,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6686.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
#### People v Barber

2d Dept: 133 AD3d 868 (Nassau)

denied 8/4/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
#### People v Ero

3d Dept: 139 AD3d 1248 (Clinton)

denied 8/10/16 (Rivera, J.)
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1*

                           Section 1350 Certification


      We, Christopher J. Dyball and Richard M. Haddock, the co-chief executive
officers of Drexler Technology Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the
United States Code that, to our knowledge:

      (i) Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report of the Company on
Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: September 29, 2003

/s/ Christopher J. Dyball        /s/ Richard M. Haddock
----------------------------     ---------------------------
Christopher J. Dyball            Richard M. Haddock



-----------------------

*  The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed "filed" with the
   SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
   under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
   whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general
   incorporation language contained in such filing.


                                       66
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16181]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-2354-001]


Citizens Utilities Company; Notice of Filing

June 12, 1998.
    Take notice that on December 15, 1997, Citizens Utilities Company 
(Citizens), tendered for filing an Amendment to its March 27, 1997, 
revised Open Access Transmission Tariff filing applicable to its 
Vermont Electric Division.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 22, 1998. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16181 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 09-11123.

#### Mark E. Allen, Petitioner v. Brian Coleman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.

562 U.S. 862, 131 S. Ct. 144,

178 L. Ed. 2d 86,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6231.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jeffrey M. Cavins, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley ACT of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the date of the financial statements contained therein.

/s/ Jeffrey M. Cavins
----------------------------------------
Jeffrey M. Cavins
Chief Executive Officer and President
November 13, 2003

                                       42
*March 24, 2017*

2017-Ohio-1066.]

2017-0059.

#### State v. Barnes.

Muskingum App. No. CT2005-0013. On appellee’s motion to strike for failure to provide service pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.11(E)(1). Motion denied.

Appellee may file a memorandum in response within 30 days of the date of this entry.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3615-3616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33540]


Blue Mountain Railroad, Inc.--Trackage Rights Exemption--Union 
Pacific Railroad Company

    Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) will agree to grant local 
trackage rights to Blue Mountain Railroad, Inc. (BMR) between: (1) UP 
milepost 210.0 at

[[Page 3616]]

Juniper, OR, and UP milepost 218.0 at Wallula Heights, WA; and (2) UP 
milepost 0.0 at Wallula, WA, and UP milepost 2.0 near Attilia, WA, a 
total distance of 10 miles. BMR will be permitted to provide local 
switching service only to Boise Cascade Corporation, Ponderosa Fibers, 
and WATCO, Inc., at Wallula, WA.
    The transaction is expected to be consummated on or shortly after 
January 15, 1998, the effective date of the exemption.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If the notice 
contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab 
initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C.10502(d) may 
be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not 
automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33540, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on: Karl Morell, Ball Janik LLP, Suite 225, 1455 F Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20005.

    Decided: January 15, 1998.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1638 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
# When weather strikes know where to go for installation status

/ Published Jan. 11, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, If inclement winter weather strikes the central Ohio area, there are several ways Defense Supply Center Columbus employees can find out about changes in the installation’s operating status.  The installation commander and site director make the call no later than 3 a.m. Some employees commute as far away as an hour or more one-way so time is of the essence when making these important decisions. Employees can be notified of changes in DSCC operating status on their mobile or home numbers, text or personal email by signing up for the AtHoc computer-based emergency notification system. To make sure personal information is up-to-date, log into AtHoc, by clicking the purple AtHoc logo located at the bottom of your computer screen.  Once AtHoc opens, click on “Access Self Service” to review and/or update email addresses and contact numbers.If there are any changes in operating status, the home page of the new DLA Land and Maritime public website will display a change in operating status. The page can be found at www.dla.mil/landandmaritime.Employees can also call the DSCC Information/Hazardous Weather Hotline at (614) 692-1800.Columbus-area television stations (WCMH NBC 4, WSYX ABC 6 and WBNS CBS 10) run installation delays or closure announcements both on-air and on their web pages.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bioenvision, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David P. Luci,
Director of Finance and General Counsel of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




                                /s/ David P. Luci
                                ---------------------------
                                David P. Luci
                                Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel
                                September 11, 2006
2017-0971.

#### State ex rel. Young v. Turner.

In Mandamus. On S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 determination. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
# DLA employee team-building project serves community

/ Published May 11, 2016