alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-63062) pertaining to the 2001 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-48978) pertaining to the 2000 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, 2000 Stock Plan, Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option
Plan, 1998 Director's Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-35926) pertaining to the 1997 Adaptive Telecom, Inc. Stock Plan of our
report dated February 11, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Metawave Communications Corporation for the year ended December
31, 1999 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
31, 2001.


                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Seattle, Washington
April 15, 2002
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00289-CV

ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

V.

HELEN DOLLARD, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at Law 

No. 2

of Tarrant County (2017-006962-2)

October 19, 2023

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32684-32685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15851]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Appointments to Performance Review Boards for Senior Executive 
Service

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Appointment to Performance Review Boards for Senior Executive 
Service.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced the 
following appointments to the NRC Performance Review Boards.
    The following individuals are appointed as members of the NRC 
Performance Review Board (PRB) responsible for making recommendations 
to the appointing and awarding authorities on performance appraisal 
ratings and performance awards for Senior Executives:

Patricia G. Norry, Deputy Executive Director for Management Services
Stephen G. Burns, Deputy General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel
Guy P. Caputo, Director, Office of Investigations
Samuel J. Collins, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
James E. Dyer, Deputy Regional Administrator, Region IV
Margaret Federline, Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory 
Research
Jesse L. Funches, Chief Financial Officer
Edward L. Halman, Director, Office of Administration
Malcolm R. Knapp, Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety 
and Safeguards
Thomas T. Martin, Director, Office for Analysis and Evaluation of 
Operational Data
Roy P. Zimmerman, Associate Director for Projects, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation

    The following individuals will serve as members of the NRC PRB 
Panel that was established to review appraisals and make 
recommendations to the appointing and awarding authorities for NRC PRB 
members:

Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory 
Programs
Karen D. Cyr, General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel
John C. Hoyle, Secretary of the Commission

    All appointments are made pursuant to Section 4314 of Chapter 43 of 
Title 5 of the United States Code.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 15, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn J. Swanson, Secretary,

[[Page 32685]]

Executive Resources Board, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555, (301) 415-7530.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of June 1998.

    For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Carolyn J. Swanson,
Secretary, Executive Resources Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15851 Filed 6-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
UAS Pilot in Command (PIC) 

Hgh Flight Photo asserts that under § 61.113 (a) and (b) private pilots are limited to noncommercial operations, however he can achieve an equivalent level of safely as aChleved by 

current regulations because his UAS does not carry any pibts or passengers. Further while 

helpful, a pilot license will not ensure remote oontrol piloting skills. We believe that the risks of 

operating a UAS are far less lhan the risk levels inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 

14 CFR part 61, et seq., thus he requests an exemption from § 61.113 Private Pilot Privileges 

and Limitations: Pilot in oommand. 

Regarding UAS operational trainirrg, the High Flight Photo has fbwn numerous praelice flights 

in remote areas as a hobbyist simulating flights for future oommercial use to gain familfarization 

with ltle Charaeteristics of his UAS' perforrnance under d'rfferent temperature and weather 

oonditions. He further slales thal he praaloes Computerizetl simulated flights to maintain 

adequate skills and response reflex time. The PIC for High Flight Photo currenUy holds an FAA 

ATP certific,ate with a cunent 3rd olass physioal (See attaoh) 

UAS Operafing Parameters 

High Flight Photo will abide by the following additional operatirrg cond'Rions under this 

exemption: 

• operate the UAS below 300 feet and within a radius distanoe of 1000 teet from the controller 

to both aid in direct line of sight visual observalion;l 

• operate the UAS for 3-7 minutes per flight; 

• land the UAS prior to the manufacturer's reoommended minimum level of battery 

power; 

• operate the UAS only within visual line of sight (VLOS); 

• use the UAS' global positioning system (GPS) flight safety feature whereby it hovers 

and then slowly lands if communication with the remote oontrol pibt is lost: 

• oonduct all operatrons under his own personal and flight safety prol000ls (induding 

posting a warning sign reading: "Attention Aerial Photography in Progress — Remafn Back 150 

feet') contained in the operating docunlenls and will aetively anatyZe flight data and other 

sources of information to oonstantty update and enhance fiis safety protocols: 

• oontaa respective airports ff operaUons will be within 5 miles to ativise them of his esDmated 

flight time, flight duration, elevatioh of flight and other pertinent information; 

• always obtain all necessary permissions prior to operration; and 

• have procedures in place to abort flights in the event of safety breaches or potential 

danger. 

High FligM Photo states that § 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an 

airvrorthiness certlficate. High Flight Photo asserts lhat SirlCe there is Currantty no oertificate 

applicable to his operation, this regulation is inapplieable. 91.9(b)(2) requires an aircrrafl flight 

manual in the aircraft, however since there are no pilots or passengers on board hiS airoraft and 

given its size, this regulation is inapplicable. High F6ght Photo can maintain an equivalent level 

of safety by maintaining a safety/Plight manual with the UAS ground station. 

Public lnterest 

7
# DLA Aviation-Cherry Point leadership welcomes Marine Corps Logistics Command personnel to North Carolina for strategic engagements

/ Published Nov. 13, 2019
RICHMOND, VA, 
Personnel from Marine Corps Logistics Command, Albany, Georgia, and Barstow, California, traveled to Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point, North Carolina for a two-day workshop Oct. 23-24.

During the visit, they met with leaders from Defense Logistics Agency Headquarters, Fort Belvoir, Virginia; DLA Land and Maritime, Columbus, Ohio; DLA Aviation-Cherry Point; and DLA Distribution Cherry Point and Susquehanna, Pennsylvania. Fleet Readiness Center East leadership also attended.  

DLA Aviation-Cherry Point Commander Navy Cmdr. Keith Klemm said the workshop allowed functional experts from DLA tied to supporting depot repair operations to engage with MARCORLOGCOM personnel.

“We wanted to illustrate how we as a DLA retail organization are integrated with our customer to support material requirements each day and illustrate known challenges we have faced and worked through over the years,” Klemm said.

Workshop highlights included:
      - DLA Aviation-Cherry Point Material Management and Planning and Support chiefs provided overviews of how their organizations’ support maintenance and production line requirements at FRC East, including collaborating to garner forecast and planning information up through backorders mitigation, emergency requirement fulfillment processes, organic manufacturing support and local stock number management.
      - MARCORLOGCOM personnel were briefed on how material is procured to fill local stock number and organic manufacturing requirements; and their ability of operating autonomously with funding provided by FRC East to meet material requirements.

Joshua Waller, deputy commander, DLA Aviation-Cherry Point provided a history of how DLA Aviation assumed supply support responsibilities at Fleet Readiness Center East from Naval Supply Systems Command that previously had been a function of Naval Aviation Depot. He also led the group from MARCORLOGCOM on a tour of the DLA Distribution Cherry Point retail warehouse; FRC East F/A-18 Production Control Center; Marine Corps CH-53 Sea Stallion helicopter and V-22 Osprey production lines; a raw metal storage location; and pre-expended bin stock location.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Silvio R. Illescas, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 896]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 11, 2016 *(People v Illescas,*139 AD 3d 873 [2016]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered February 25, 2014.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the *1264effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Rivera, J.P., Hall, Roman, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.
#### Walter Melvin, Respondent, v Sarah Melvin, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 48]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael L. Katz, J.), entered May 8, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff husband’s cross motion for an order declaring defendant wife judicially estopped from claiming that charitable contributions reported on the parties’ joint income tax returns from 2011 through 2015 constituted marital waste, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The wife argues that charitable contributions totaling approximately $1.5 million, reflected on the parties’ joint tax returns from 2011 through 2015, were made without her consent. However, she does not deny that she signed the tax returns under penalty of perjury, that the charity receiving the contributions was a bona fide nonprofit organization, and that the marital estate received a benefit from the contributions in the form of tax deductions. Although the wife claims that the husband only sent her the signature page of the tax returns, so that she was unaware of their contents, she had unfettered access to the complete returns from the parties’ accountant. In any event, by signing the tax returns, she is presumed to have read and understood their contents *(see Vulcan Power Co. v Munson,*89 AD3d 494 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*19 NY3d 807 [2012]; *see also Da Silva v Musso,*53 NY2d 543, 550-551 [1981]). Significantly, the wife does not argue that the husband received a financial gain from the donations, only that they were inherently wasteful in their excess.

Under these circumstances, the motion court properly granted the husband’s cross motion to preclude the wife from claiming the charitable contributions as marital waste. “A party to litigation may not take a position contrary to a position taken in an income tax return” *(Mahoney-Buntzman v Buntzman,*12 NY3d 415, 422 [2009]). By signing the joint tax return, the wife represented that the charitable contributions were made in both parties’ names as a married couple. Thus, she is judicially estopped from now claiming that the donations were, in fact, made without her consent *{see id.).*

Contrary to the wife’s contentions, any procedural error was harmless. The husband clearly sought to limit the scope of issues to be tried in the procedural equivalent of a motion for *597partial summary judgment, and, to that end, the parties submitted substantive motion papers, including sworn affidavits and documentary evidence, sufficient for the motion court to make that determination.

Concur — Renwick, J.P., Richter, Kern and Moulton, JJ.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF MEDIACOM LLC
AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                       331
<INVENTORY>                                      8,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         328,038
<DEPRECIATION>                                (53,985)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 448,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   448,085
<SALES>                                         36,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,000
<CGS>                                           11,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   993
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,466)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,466)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,466)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.3


         CONSENT OF PRIOR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We  have  issued  our  reports  dated  September  16,  2004   accompanying   the
consolidated  financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Bioenvision,  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  on Form 10-K for the year  ended June 30,
2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of Bioenvision,  Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-113094,  effective February 25, 2004) and Post Effective Amendment No. 1
to Form S-8 (File No. 333-113094, effective January 6, 2005).




/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
New York, New York
September 6, 2006
EX-4.4

ADDENDUM TO CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AND SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT

                ADDENDUM TO CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AND
                    SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT

     This Addendum to Convertible Debenture and Securities Purchase
Agreement ("Addendum") is entered into as of the 17th day of November
2004 by and between GameZnFlix, Inc., a Nevada corporation
("GameZnFlix"), and Golden Gate Investors, Inc., a California
corporation ("GGI").

     WHEREAS, GGI and Integrated are parties to that certain 4 _ %
Convertible Debenture dated as of November 11, 2004 ("Debenture");
and

     WHEREAS, GGI and Integrated are parties to that certain
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of November 11, 2004
("Purchase Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Debenture and Purchase
Agreement in certain respects.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and
covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, Integrated and GGI agree as follows:

1.  All terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall
have the definitions set forth in the Debenture or Purchase
Agreement.

2.  The Purchase Price for the Debenture shall be $1,500,000. GGI
shall advance the Purchase Price to GameZnFlix as follows: (a)
$100,000 immediately, (b) $50,000 upon notification and
verification that the Registration Statement has been filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, (c) $150,000 (less legal
fees previously advanced by GGI on behalf of GameZnFlix) upon
notification and verification that the Registration Statement
has been declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the Common Shares can legally be issued to GGI,
(d) $200,000 each time the remaining principal balance of the
Debenture declines below $50,000 until the full Purchase Price
has been advanced by GGI to GameZnFlix. Upon notification and
verification that the Registration Statement has been declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
Common Shares can legally be issued to GGI, GGI shall pay
$15,000 to GameZnFlix as reimbursement for administrative
expenses incurred by Gameznfliz in connection with this transaction.

3.  Except as specifically amended herein, all other terms and
conditions of the Debenture and Purchase Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.

     IN WINESS WHEREOF, GameZnFlix, Inc. and GGI have caused this
Addendum to be signed by its duly authorized offiCers on the date
first set forth above.


GameZnFlix, Inc.                       Golden Gate Investors, Inc.



By: /s/  John Fleming                  By: /s/  Travis W. Hoff
John Fleming                           Travis W. Hoff
Title: Chief Executive Officer         Title: Portfolio Manager


The undersigned personally guarantees repayment of the $150,000
amount set forth in sections 2(a) and (b) above. This personal
guarantee shall terminate when the Registration Statement is declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Common
Shares can legally be issued to GGI.


/s/  John Fleming
John Fleming
No. 09-11447.

#### Bryan Richard Hamm, Petitioner v. Kentucky.

562 U.S. 881, 131 S. Ct. 201,

178 L. Ed. 2d 120,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6836.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kentucky denied.
# Second annual Aviation Leadership Academy, building leadership through teamwork

/ Published April 25, 2023
Richmond, Va., 
April 18 - 20 marks the second annual Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Leadership Academy, held at the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. The academy is a training course designed for employees in non-supervisory paygrades GS 11-13 aspiring to move into leadership positions.

DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler kicked off the three-day event by delivering opening remarks, asking the audience why they would want to be a supervisor.

“We need you,” Tyler said.” Ultimately, it’s about taking care of your people and allowing them to do the mission.”

James Woods, inventory management specialist within DLA Aviation’s Planning Programs Directorate, said attending the academy made an impact on how he plans to move forward by leading others effectively.

“This training course will personally help me to have an effective team, going from a member of a team to leading a team. You must know the people you’re in charge of. A good way to do that is to begin by talking with individuals to see where they are, what their personal goals are, and guide them in the right direction,” said Woods.

Woods is among 150 Aviation employees who joined the training in-person.

Trinace Johnson and Pamela Frederick, both program analysts within the Command Support Directorate, began hosting the event last year and grew the program into what it is today.

“We hope that the program will give attendees some clarification and help them in making the difficult decision as to whether or not they want to move into a supervisory/leadership role,” Frederick said. “The workforce has shown a major interest in attending this event, so much so that we had to re-open the registration twice in order to accommodate those requesting to take part in the training.”

Those who attended the three-day course heard from leadership on topics such as leadership and coaching, resilience fundamental, labor and employee relations, transitioning from peer to supervisor, ethics, sexual assault prevention and response, equal employment opportunity; reasonable accommodation and EEO process for leaders, employment assistance program, and professional development opportunities.

The final courses highlighted a senior leader mentoring panel where employees heard from Tanya Hill, DLA Aviation’s chief of staff, Floyd Moore, director of DLA Aviation’s Engineering Directorate, Julia Roquemore, deputy director of DLA Aviation’s Supplier Operations Commodities Directorate and Adam Hardee, chief of the Industrial Analysis Support Branch of DLA Aviation’s Business Process Support Directorate.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) Registration Statement No.
333-110674 on Form S-3, as amended; (ii) Registration Statement No. 333-91013 on
Form S-3; (iii) Registration Statement No. 333-85257 on Form S-3; (iv)
Registration Statement No. 333-46255 on Form S-3; (v) Registration Statement No.
333-123284 on Form S-8; (vi) Registration Statement No. 102654 on Form S-8; and
(vii) Registration Statement 333-91867 on Form S-8; of our report dated March
11, 2005, relating to the financial statements of Double Eagle Petroleum Co.
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Double Eagle Petroleum Co. for
the year ended December 31, 2004.

HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP

Denver, Colorado
April 6, 2005