alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31-17**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony F. Earley, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 of MichiganConsolidated Gas Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted)  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR. Date: August 4, 2005   Anthony F. Earley, Jr.  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
No. 10-6461.

#### Joseph L. Rainey, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 989, 131 S. Ct. 432,

178 L. Ed. 2d 336,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8162,

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 605 F.3d 581.
#### Public Administrator of Bronx County, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[67 NYS3d 608]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Faviola Soto, J.), entered September 21, 2016, dismissing all pleadings against the Transit defendants, upon a grant of a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the judgment vacated, and the matter remanded for a new trial. Order, same court (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered November 14, 2016, which granted the Transit defendants and Eric Roman’s motion to vacate a prior order entered June 28, 2016 amending the caption to substitute Roman in the place of defendant “John Doe,” dismiss the amended complaint filed July 28, 2016, and award sanctions against plaintiff’s counsel, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of our discretion, without costs, and the motion denied.

A directed verdict was not warranted. An eyewitness’s testimony that decedent was in the roadway attempting to stand after being hit by codefendant Arthur Gomez’s car and before being hit by the Transit defendants’ bus, could allow a rational jury to find that Roman, the bus driver, was negligent in failing to see decedent *(see Herrera v New York City Tr.*Auth., 269 AD2d 212, 213 [1st Dept 2000]; *see generally Szczerbiak v Pilat,*90 NY2d 553, 556 [1997]). Moreover, the eyewitness and plaintiff’s medical expert both testified that decedent was still alive at the time he was hit by the bus.

The criminal conviction of Gomez did not preclude plaintiff from demonstrating that Roman was a proximate cause of decedent’s death. Plaintiff was not a party to the criminal proceeding and did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue *(see Buechel v Bain,*97 NY2d 295, 303-304 [2001], *cert denied*535 US 1096 [2002]).

Given the foregoing, the judgment of dismissal against the Transit defendants is vacated, the amended complaint filed *547July 28, 2016 reinstated, the order amending the caption to substitute Roman for John Doe as a defendant reinstated, and the matter remanded for a new trial.

We vacate the award of sanctions, as the record supports plaintiff’s assertion that plaintiff was not trying to defraud the court or prejudice the Transit defendants.

We have considered defendants-respondents’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Friedman, J.R, Gische, Webber, Kahn and Singh, JJ.
United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region IX Air Division 

Technical Support Document 

for 

EPA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

for the 

California State Implementation Plan 

as Submitted by the California Air Resources Board 

EPA’s analysis of 

Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District 

Rule 202 − Permit Exemptions 

March 12, 2015 

Prepared by Larry Maurin and Jefferson Wehling 

Approved by Gerardo Rios 
1 

Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District (EKAPCD or District) 

Submitted Rule 

• Rule 202, Permit Exemptions, was originally adopted on April 18, 1972 under the title, 

Exemptions. The rule has been revised ten times since the last SIP-approved version of 

the rule was approved by EPA on July 6, 1982. See Table 1 below for a list of the 

adoption and submittal dates for revisions of Rule 202. While each of these revisions was 

submitted to EPA for inclusion in the SIP, EPA has not taken action on any of these 

submittals. The current rule revision was adopted on January 13, 2011 and was submitted 

by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on June 21, 2011. While EPA can only 

take action on the most current submittal, we list below all of the changes made since 

Rule 202 was last SIP approved.

Table 1. Adoption and corresponding submittal dates

of EKAPCD Rule 202 revisions 

Adoption Date Submittal Date 

April 25, 1983 July 19, 1983 

November 18, 1985 June 22, 1987 

August 22, 1989 January 28, 1992 

April 30, 1990 January 28, 1992 

August 19, 1991 January 28, 1992 

May 2, 1996 July 23, 1996 

January 8, 1998 May 18, 1998 

March 13, 2003 June 5, 2003 

January 8, 2004 February 20, 2004 

January 13, 2011 June 21, 2011 

Applicable State Implementation Plan (SIP) Rule 

• Rule 202, Exemptions – The SIP approved version of this rule was adopted on December 

15, 1980, submitted on March 23, 1981, and approved into the SIP on July 6, 1982 (47 

FR 29231).

Background 

Eastern Kern County is currently classified as a marginal and moderate nonattainment area for 

the 2008 and 1997 federal 8-hour ozone standards, respectively, a serious nonattainment area for 

PM10, and attainment or unclassifiable for all other National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). 

Agricultural operations are a significant source of air pollution throughout the state of California, 

including Eastern Kern County. Historically, agricultural operations had been exempted from 

many regulatory requirements, including the need for air pollution permits. On September 22, 

2003, California Senate Bill 700 (SB 700) became law and removed the blanket permitting
No. 10-12.

#### Jo Carol Alford, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Arthur Randall Alford, Deceased, Petitioner v. Mississippi Division of Medicaid.

562 U.S. 889, 131 S. Ct. 224,

178 L. Ed. 2d 135,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7001.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.

Same case below, 30 So. 3d 1212.
#### Shettle v. Myers

03/30/2016

677 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super,, 131 A.3d 86
No. 09-1188.

#### Frank A. Skinner, Petitioner v. Department of Justice, et al.

562 U.S. 946, 131 S. Ct. 72,

178 L. Ed. 2d 240,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7686.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of *241Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 388 U.S. App. D.C. 261, 584 F.3d 1093.
# Land and Maritime celebrates 68 years of air power

/ Published Sept. 24, 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio,
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TUMBLEWEED, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>



<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                               456,425
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        825,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                        1,674,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   3,363,997
<PP&E>                                                            30,559,997
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     5,161,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    37,144,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              4,746,223
<BONDS>                                                           13,836,662
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                              58,818
<OTHER-SE>                                                        17,772,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      37,144,788
<SALES>                                                           12,821,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  13,632,368
<CGS>                                                              3,671,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      9,000,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   317,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      643,277
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         225,147
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  418,130
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         418,130
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0.07



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-163]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements filed during the week of 
December 26, 1997

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. Section 412 and 414. 
Answers may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.
    Docket Number: OST--97--3281.

    Date Filed: December 23, 1997.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC23/123 Telex Mail Vote 903, Australia-Europe excursion 
fares r1-071II r2-071oo. Intended effective date: January 15, 1998.

    Docket Number: OST--97--3282.

    Date Filed: December 23, 1997.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC COMP 0201 (Report) dated December 19, 1997, PTC COMP 
Fares 0114 dated December 19, l997, Resolution 015n--US-TC12/123 Add-on 
Amounts, (US-Europe (except UK), Africa, Middle East, TC3). Intended 
effective date: April 1, 1998.
Carol Kelley,
Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 98-163 Filed 1-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 227 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 227

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to remove a restriction on the 
   requirement for the Secretary of the Air Force to dispose of real 
 property at deactivated intercontinental ballistic missile facilities 
                        to adjacent landowners.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 27 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

  Mr. Daschle introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to remove a restriction on the 
   requirement for the Secretary of the Air Force to dispose of real 
 property at deactivated intercontinental ballistic missile facilities 
                        to adjacent landowners.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY AT MISSILE SITES TO ADJACENT 
              LANDOWNERS.

    Subparagraph (D) of section 9781(a)(2) of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(D) is surrounded by one or more tracts of land that are 
        owned by one or more owners.''.

                                 <all>
```
# Troop Support Medical’s system marks 2500 critical supplies shipments

/ Published July 13, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
On July 11, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Medical Transportation Team marked 2500 freight shipments using a new system that delivers bulk orders of critical supplies in record time.

The Warehouse Management System allows customers to browse, compare and order a wide range of medical/surgical equipment, collectively weighing over 300 pounds, that is not available through distribution and pricing agreements under the Medical Prime Vendor program.

“DLA Troop Support Medical’s Transportation team monitors [overseas electronic catalogue] orders and then uses its extensive network of transportation assets to meet them on time, target, and budget,” said Medical Tailored Vendor Logistics Specialist, Thor Myers.

Utilization of this system cuts down the time between when the Warfighter orders an item and when they receive it.

“This system decreases required delivery timeframes while increasing customer support and satisfaction; provides primary and back-up carriers to support day-to-day steady state operations, as well as the ability to flex and add additional carriers to support increased shipments of medical supplies during contingency and/or surge operations,” Operational Customer Facing Division Chief, Army Lt. Col. Edwin Caudell said.

The system is funded by DLA’s Warstopper Program, which helps the procurement of items vital to the wartime mission, but not generally required in peacetime. When the Defense Department has a requirement industry doesn’t have a business case to support, DLA uses its Warstopper Program to fill the need.

All medical supply chains have both primary and secondary carriers to accommodate the transportation environment, Caudell said. Specifically, if a surge requires additional capacity, or the primary carrier is unable to handle peacetime volume, secondary carriers are activated by the DLA Troop Support Medical Transportation Office.

“The dedicated and talented members of the DLA Troop Support Medical Transportation Team are the unsung heroes of the DLA Medical supply chain,” said Caudell. “Without their methodical and continuous efforts and attention to detail, the supply chain would be unable to support the warfighters and thousands of other DLA medical customers located OCONUS.”
No. 10-6187.

#### Anthony McQueen, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 971, 131 S. Ct. 482,

178 L. Ed. 2d 305,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8107.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 366 Fed. Appx. 477.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001064435
<NAME>                        CLUETT AMERICAN CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-2000
<CASH>                          3,491
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   62,660
<ALLOWANCES>                    9,657
<INVENTORY>                     84,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                144,975
<PP&E>                          46,469
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  241,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           77,600
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     58,329
<COMMON>                        1
<OTHER-SE>                      (154,932)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    241,583
<SALES>                         85,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                85,615
<CGS>                           64,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   20,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              7,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (6,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                    202
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (6,726)
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     (6,726)
<EPS-BASIC>                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0



</TABLE>
# FedMall users must have active status by Oct. 12 or lose account access

/ Published Oct. 6, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Military and federal agency customers who use FedMall to order items like repair parts and basic office supplies must log in to their accounts to maintain an active status before Oct. 12 to ensure continued access when the e-commerce site moves to a new platform in November.

Accounts that haven’t been used in 90 days are inactive and won’t migrate to FedMall’s new home in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment. Those account holders will be required to register in PIEE as a new user and obtain supervisor and government administrator approval before they can access FedMall. Active account users will simply be asked to confirm their information when entering PIEE for the first time.

Order history and user information will still be available in PIEE for active users, and those who have to re-register won’t lose such data.

FedMall Technical Manager Richard Campagna said FedMall’s move to PIEE has been in process for two years. Initial testing occurred in June 2020 and user acceptance testing will be completed this month.

The transition benefits customers by providing a single sign on for access to a range of federal procurement tools, Campagna said. It also improves oversight.

“That means better accountability, better controls and better auditability,” he continued.

Campagna compared PIEE to a shopping mall.

“It’s like going into a mall that has lots of different stores but you only need to go into certain ones. Within PIEE, there are numerous applications with role-based access that require approval based on users’ jobs, so you only use the ones you’re registered for,” he said.

The existing FedMall URL will remain live. Users attempting to sign in or register will be rerouted to PIEE, where they’ll see icons for individual applications after signing in to the platform.

FedMall itself is not changing though administrators are working on several system improvements that are planned for release next fall, Campagna added. The online ordering system has about 160,000 accounts with about 45,000 currently active.

For registration or login help, contact the PIEE Help Desk at 1-866-618-5988. To register or log in to PIEE, visit https://piee.eb.mil.
# Battle Creek Hosts ACOR23 

/ Published Aug. 14, 2023
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Watch as Logistics Operations exercise planner John Snead discusses the intent behind DLA's Agency Contingency Operations Readiness Exercise 23 -  which recently concluded at the Battle Creek Air National Guard Base. 

01:24VIDEO  | 01:24 |ACOR23 Takes Place in Battle Creek, Michigan