alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33362-33363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP96-128-008]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed change in 
FERC Gas Tariff

June 12, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 1, 1998, Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company 
(Eastern Shore) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with a 
proposed effective date of July 1, 1998:

First Revised Sheet No. 213
First Revised Sheet No. 214
First Revised Sheet No. 215

    Eastern Shore states that the purpose of the filing is to comply 
with ordering paragraph (G) of the Commission's October 15, 1997 order 
issued in Docket Nos. CP96-128-000, et al. The order

[[Page 33363]]

directed Eastern Shore to file revised tariff sheets by June 1, 1998 to 
be effective July 1, 1998 to fully comply with the GISB electronic 
communication standards.
    Eastern Shore states that copies of its filing are available for 
inspection at its office at 417 Bank Lane, Dover, Delaware and has been 
mailed to all firm customers, interruptible customers, and affected 
state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16184 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2017239EN.01004401.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2017 — Groupe Léa Nature v EUIPO — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO’BiO ētic)

(Case T-341/13 RENV) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark SO’BiO ētic - Earlier EU and national word marks SO...? - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Detriment to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 239/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Groupe Léa Nature SA (Périgny, France) (represented by: S. Arnaud, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Gája, Agent)

Defendant:

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: T. Alkin, Barrister)

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2013 (Case R 203/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Debonair Trading Internacional and Groupe Léa Nature.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action

| 2. | Orders Groupe Léa Nature SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by the intervener before the General Court and the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Groupe Léa Nature SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by the intervener before the General Court and the Court of Justice.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
#### People v Algarin

1st Dept: 146 AD3d 455 (Bronx)

denied 3/1/17 (Fahey, J.)
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60430-60431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24338]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9737-3]

Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Committee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

[[Page 60431]]

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, 
EPA gives notice of a teleconference meeting of the Farm, Ranch, and 
Rural Communities Committee (FRRCC). The FRRCC is a policy-oriented 
committee that provides policy advice, information, and recommendations 
to the EPA Administrator on a range of environmental issues and 
policies that are of importance to agriculture and rural communities.
    The purpose of this teleconference is to discuss specific topics of 
relevance for consideration by the Committee in order to provide advice 
and insights to the Agency on environmental policies and programs that 
affect and engage agriculture and rural communities.

DATES: Monday, October 22, 2012, from 12 p.m. until 2 p.m. Eastern 
Daylight Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alicia Kaiser, Designated Federal 
Officer, kaiser.alicia@epa.gov, 202-564-7273, US EPA, Office of the 
Administrator (1101A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members of the public wishing to gain access 
to the teleconference, make brief oral comments, or provide a written 
statement to the FRRCC must contact Alicia Kaiser, Designated Federal 
Officer, at kaiser.alicia@epa.gov or 202-564-7273 by October 15, 2012.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities or to request accommodations please 
contact Alicia Kaiser at kaiser.alicia@epa.gov or 202-564-7273, 
preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much 
time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: September 19, 2012.
Alicia Kaiser,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-24338 Filed 10-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16197]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-247-000]


Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

June 12, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 9, 1998, Northwest Alaskan Pipeline 
Company (Northwest Alaskan) tendered for filing to become part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 2, the following tariff sheets, 
with the proposed effective date of October 1, 1998:

Original Sheet Nos. 124DN-124DQ
First Revised Sheet No. 219
Original Sheet Nos. 220-223
First Revised Sheet No. 317
Original Sheet Nos. 318-321
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 400

    Northwest Alaskan states that this filing is being made to reflect 
the proposed abandonment and tariff termination of Rate Schedule X-4 
and tariff revisions to Rate Schedules X-1, X-2 and X-3 to implement, 
in part, a broader transaction which is intended to restructure the 
arrangements among Northwest Alaskan, its supplier, Pan-Alberta Gas 
Ltd. (Pan-Alberta) and its purchaser, PITCO. In brief, this transaction 
would restructure the sale such that Northwest Alaskan's rights and 
obligations under the Gas Sales Contract dated March 9, 1978, by and 
between Northwest Alaskan and Pan-Alberta, as amended (WesternContract) 
will be assigned to and assumed by Pan-Alberta Gas U.S. (PAG-US); 
Northwest Alaskan's related sale to PITCO and PITCO's related sale to 
Southern California Gas Company (``SoCalGas'') will be terminated; and 
PAG-US will enter into a new contract directly with SoCalGas for the 
sale of a portion of the gas. In addition, PITCO will transfer its 
current pipeline capacity rights on the PG&E Gas Transmission-Northwest 
Pipeline Corporation (PGT) and Northwest Pipeline Corporation systems 
to PAG-US.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16197 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10M2.

#### Eugene J. Fisch, Petitioner v. Republic of Poland, et al.

562 U.S. 819, 131 S. Ct. 373,

178 L. Ed. 2d 10,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6729.

October 4, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31716-31717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15377]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Export Administration Bureau


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of

[[Page 31717]]

Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Agency: Bureau of Export Administration (BXA).
    Title: Technology Letter of Explanation (formerly entitled 
Technical Data Letter of Explanation).
    Agency Form Number: BXA-748P.
    OMB Approval Number: 0694-0047.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection of 
information.
    Burden: 722 hours.
    Average Time Per Response: 1 to 2 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 461 respondents.
    Needs and Uses: The information contained in these letters will 
assure BXA that no unauthorized technical data will be exported for 
unauthorized end-uses or to unauthorized destinations and thus provide 
assurance that U.S. national security and foreign policy programs are 
followed. In addition, shipments to Poland, Hungary, and 
Czechoslovakia, need an Import Certificate issued by the appropriate 
national government.
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit 
institutions.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Victoria Baecher-Wassmer (202) 395-5871.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Victoria Baecher-Wassmer, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New 
Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20230.

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 98-15377 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P
No. 10-5574.

No. 10-5636.

#### Jose Navas, Petitioner v. United States. Jose Alvarez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 954, 131 S. Ct. 320,

178 L. Ed. 2d 254,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7681.

October 4, 2010.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Same cases below, 597 F.3d 492.
# C_2016222EN.01004603.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/46

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 May 2016 — Schmidt v Commission

(Case F-69/13) (1)

(2016/C 222/64)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21/9/2013, p. 31.

---
2017-1064.

#### State ex rel. Bates v. Guernsey Cty. Court of Common Pleas.

In Mandamus. On S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 determination. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
** **

**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**COBIZ FINANCIAL INC.**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of CoBiz Financial Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, forthe year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 3, 2010 | /s/ Lyne B. Andrich |
|---------------------------|---------------------|
|                      | Lyne B. Andrich     |
|                      | EVP & CFO  |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, January 28, 1998, 10:00 a.m.

LOCATION: Room 420, East West Towers, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Open to the Public.

Matter to be Considered:

Bicycle Helmets

    The Commission will consider options for a final safety standard 
for bicycle helmets.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: January 20, 1998.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1665 Filed 1-20-98; 2:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
#### IN THE MATTER OF SHARMAN M. MEADE-MURPHY.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary Nos. 676, 680)

(410 SE2d 99)

Per curiam.

The State Bar of Georgia filed two formal complaints against Respondent Sharman M. Meade-Murphy, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Georgia. In Supreme Court Docket No. 676, the Bar alleged that Respondent had engaged in conduct which demonstrated that she is “want of a sound mind” within the meaning of Bar Rule 4-104 (a), and that she should therefore be removed from the practice of law. In Supreme Court Docket No. 680, the Bar alleged that Respondent had violated Standards 4, 45 (b), and 47 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d), and that she should be disbarred.

Respondent moved for a trial by jury pursuant to Bar Rule 4-214. Subsequently the State Bar moved for summary judgment in both cases. The Special Master denied the Bar’s motions for summary judgment, finding that there were genuine issues of fact to be decided by the jury.

These matters were then transferred to the Superior Court of Fulton County, Bar Rule 4-214, and the State Bar moved that court to review the rulings of the Special Master under Bar Rule 4-215 (d). The Superior Court reversed the Special Master. The court found that Respondent had filed four lawsuits in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. All four cases had been dismissed, with costs awarded to the defendant in three of them. Despite these dismissals, on two separate occasions Respondent filed affidavits of garnishment in the amount of 30 million dollars in the State Court of Fulton County, representing to the court in each instance that she had prevailed in the aforementioned litigation. These actions were subsequently dismissed. The trial court determined that Respondent’s conduct constituted a violation of Standards 4 and 45 (b) of Bar Rule 4-102. The trial court further found that Respondent violated Standard 47 of Bar Rule 4-102 in that she directly communicated with an opposing party in this litigation who was represented by counsel without first obtaining consent of counsel. The trial court found that Respondent had neither refuted nor attempted to justify *673her conduct, and that summary judgment in favor of the State Bar was therefore appropriate. The trial court did not address the allegations regarding Respondent’s mental impairment.

Decided November 14, 1991.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

The Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board accepted and approved the findings of the Superior Court of Fulton County. The Review Panel consequently found that Respondent violated Standards 4, 45 (b), and 47 of Bar Rule 4-102 (d), and recommended that she be disbarred.

We have reviewed the record in this case and approve and adopt the recommendation of the Review Panel. It is ordered that Sharman M. Meade-Murphy be disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Georgia, and that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

*All the Justices concur.*
No. 10-5384.

#### Christopher Rudow, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 918, 131 S. Ct. 288,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7283.

178 L. Ed. 2d 189,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 298.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersignedhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| \s\ James H. Moore      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James H. Moore          |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| May 10, 2007            |   |

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retainedby Mines Management, Inc and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                     
<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
                           
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                2,606 
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        12,314
<ALLOWANCES>                            792
<INVENTORY>                          15,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     31,071
<PP&E>                                6,133
<DEPRECIATION>                       10,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       42,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                23,883
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                              2,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                           16,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         42,596
<SALES>                              90,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     90,324
<CGS>                                73,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        73,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     14,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       (400)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    1,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         601 
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     601 
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                            601 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.10 
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.10 
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-5129.

#### General Parker, Petitioner v. Sakinah Parker, et al.

562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 246,

178 L. Ed. 2d 163,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6624.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 708.
#### People v Ceruti

2d Dept: 132 AD3d 776 (Queens)

dismissed 8/25/16 (Stein, J.)
# DLA Modernization reaches new heights with unveiling of WMS

/ Published Feb. 1, 2023
SAN ANTONIO, Texa., 
Members of the Defense Logistics Agency gathered in San Antonio, Texas, for the official unveiling of the Warehouse Management System and ribbon cutting ceremony.

“I am excited because this culminates five years’ worth of vision and from a Disposition Services standpoint about 13 months of very intense and deliberate work;” said Disposition Services Director Mike Cannon, who has been present for every step of the WMS process – from its infancy to the present day where he is now able to see it put into operational use. “All so that we could transfer our management of excess property into a system that is better, cheaper, faster and more auditable.”

With the help of multiple sections within the agency tweaking and troubleshooting the system to correct potential issues, WMS is finally ready for implementation.

Not only did the WMS team need to work out the kinks of a brand-new system, but also had to specifically tailor the software to work in the best way possible throughout all sites across the agency. This standardization required a team effort, and the entire agency should reap the benefits.

“What this team has done with standardizing WMS [is impressive],” said Deputy Chief Information Officer Karyn Runstrom. “We need to do things standard as much as possible across the organization to keep costs at a minimum and make processes smoother and more practical.”

Disposition Services has evolved from using key punch machines, shifting to the Disposition Services Automated Information System – the first automated information system – to its next iteration the Distribution Standard System and now the age of WMS begins.

WMS is the latest modernization within the agency and is poised to have widespread effects on process improvements across DLA. The agency has made a commitment to evolving to meet the current and future needs of the warfighter.

“We need to step forward into the 21st century,” said RADM Doug Noble, Director, DLA Logistics Operations Commander, Joint Regional Combat Support. “With modern tools, modern processes, and modernized capabilities that will let us continue to provide the great support cost effectively, but efficiently – and driving readiness for all of our customers.”

Disposition Services San Antonio is serving as the initial site to go online with WMS as other locations will follow in the coming weeks. The rollout plan projects all Disposition Services and Distribution locations across the agency will operate under WMS with the final site going online in September of 2025.