alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 2022 Aviation Hall of Fame nominations accepted through Jan. 31

/ Published Dec. 15, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
Nominations for the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s annual Hall of Fame for 2022 are open through Jan. 31, 2023. The Aviation Hall of Fame honors former employees who have made significant and enduring contributions to DLA Aviation or Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia.

To be eligible, nominees must have been separated from DLA or the DLA Aviation community for at least one year from the date of their reassignment, retirement, discharge or death.

The DLA Aviation community is comprised of both military and civilian government employees from all DLA Aviation locations, or any DLA activity located on the Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia.

Former employees are defined as government civilians and military (active duty and reserve components). Nominees should not be in a position to return to employment with DLA.

Nominees must meet at least one of the following criteria:

-Accomplished an enduring achievement that has life-long specific benefits to the center and Defense Logistics Agency.

-Made a specific or continuous accomplishment positively affecting a large segment of DLA Aviation’s employees, customers and/or vendors.

Made a long-term contribution that has a lasting and positive impact on DLA Aviation’s -mission and/or business practices.

More details on the nomination criteria can be found in the Aviation Hall of Fame guidelines.

Any current or former employee can complete their nomination online or email their completed nomination to the DLA Aviation Awards Coordinator Yolanda Adams-Hall at yolanda.adams-hall@dla.mil. For more information, call Adams-Hall at (804) 279-3664.
# DLA Medical ECAT turns 25

/ Published Oct. 10, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
For the past 25 years, the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Medical supply chain’s Electronic Catalog system has been providing customers with a user-friendly capability to order approximately 1.3 million medical items.

The supply chain recognized this milestone with a celebratory brunch in Philadelphia on Oct. 4.

Over the years, ECAT has come a long way and it is a team effort, said Army Col. Bruce Argueta, Medical supply chain director.

“Everyone plays a part in ECAT here,” Argueta said. “Everyone touches the program. There isn’t one single point of failure.”

Modified initially by a West Virginia contractor in 1998, ECAT is a web-based ordering system where customers can order items from various medical product lines with just the internet, a computer and DLA authorization.

ECAT product lines include the niche medical markets of dental, optical, laboratory, medical/surgical items, small medical equipment, hospital equipment and surgical implants. Any federally funded organization can utilize the ECAT system. Current customers include the Department of Defense, Veterans Administration, Health and Human Services, the Indian Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institutes of Health, Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of State.

According to the DLA public site, ECAT was developed to streamline business practices and expand the range of the supply chain’s procurement options. The system also enables DLA to leverage demand across the entire federal government and combine its buying power to obtain lower prices.   

The off-site systems development of ECAT was effective in its initial development, but in 2000 DLA had the foresight to bring the development internal and hired the contractors to work on-site to continue development.  This internal development approach provided the supply chain with added agility and the ability to collect metrics, said Linda Stipa, the Medical program support manager.

At its inception, the goal was for the program to generate 250 million dollars in sales to support the warfighter, said Dan Keefe, Director of Medical Supplier Operations.

At the end of fiscal 2022, the ECAT program generated 1.2 billion dollars and the expectation is to be at or near the same once fiscal 2023 final sales are calculated.

None of this could have been achieved without the assistance of the entire Medical supply chain, Stipa said.

“I look around the room and I know this program touches everyone across the directorate,” she said. “I just want to say thank you. I could not ask for a better team, a better program, a better supply chain to be working for. I hope to be here to celebrate the 30th milestone.”
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 13, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

04-10454

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GUADALUPE GONZALEZ, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

7:02-CR-12-1

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Guadalupe Gonzalez, Jr., seeks to appeal his sentence for

conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500

grams or more of cocaine and carrying and possessing a firearm in

relation to a drug trafficking crime. Gonzalez neither filed a

timely notice of appeal, nor sought a timely extension of time for

filing one. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(1) & (4). Instead, over seven

months after the district court imposed sentence, Gonzalez filed

a pro se motion for an out-of-time appeal, claiming that, contrary
2

to his request, his attorney had not filed a notice of appeal. The

district court granted the motion but did not re-enter the original

judgment. Gonzalez then filed a notice of appeal with our court.

Because the judgment was not re-entered, the Government filed an

unopposed motion to remand and hold the appeal in abeyance. That

motion was granted. The district court then re-entered the

judgment, and this appeal proceeded. 

“[A] district court does not have the authority to create

appellate jurisdiction simply by ordering an out-of-time direct

criminal appeal. Compliance with the Federal Rules of Appellate

Procedure is imperative.” United States v. West, 240 F.3d 456, 459

(5th Cir. 2001) (emphasis in original). West addresses the proper

procedures for granting an out-of-time appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255. See id. at 459-61. 

We therefore VACATE the district court’s order granting the

out-of-time appeal, and REMAND the case. On remand, the district

court should determine, in the light of West, and with regard to

the advice requirements of Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375,

383 (2003), whether it will construe the motion for an out-of-time

appeal as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.

Should the district court construe Gonzalez’s motion for an

out-of-time appeal as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, the district court

should provide the “second or successive” warnings mandated by

Castro. See Castro, 540 U.S. at 383. The district court should
3

also instruct Gonzalez to include all 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claims

presently available to him in his current motion to vacate, set

aside, or correct the sentence. See United States v. OrozcoRamirez, 211 F.3d 862, 867-70 (5th Cir. 2000). 

VACATED and REMANDED
#### Com. v. Roberts 19

09/06/2016

174 MAL (2016)

19

. Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 759
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that (1) this Quarterly
report of Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc. & Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30,
2004.





/s/James DiLorenzo
-------------------
Name: James DiLorenzo
Title: Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



Date: September 10, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15506]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provision of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' 
(5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b), notice is hereby given of the Defense Nuclear 
Facilities Safety Board's (Board) meeting described below.

TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 9:00 a.m., June 24, 1998.

PLACE: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Public Hearing 
Room, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20004.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 
will convene the seventh quarterly briefing regarding the status of 
progress of the activities associated with the DOE's Implementation 
Plan for the Board's Recommendation 95-2, Integrated Safety Management. 
In addition to overall status, discussions will focus on feedback and 
improvements programs, and preparation of lists of requirements based 
on DOE approved processes such as Work Smart Standards.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Robert M. Anderson, General 
Counsel, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, 
NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-
free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 
reserves its right to further schedule and otherwise regulate the 
course of this meeting, to recess, reconvene, postpone or adjourn the 
meeting, and otherwise exercise its authority under the Atomic Energy 
Act of 1954, as amended.

    Dated: June 5, 1998.
John T. Conway,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 98-15506 Filed 6-5-98; 3:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-M
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation (Qwest),
that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Qwest on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q.
A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                           
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 31, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard C. Notebaert                                  
|                        |  |     |  | Richard C. Notebaert Chief Executive Officer and President
|                        |  |    
|Dated: October 31, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Oren G. Shaffer                                       
|                        |  |     |  | Oren G. Shaffer Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
No. 12-653.

#### McLeod et al. *v.*PB Investment Corp. et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 10-5282.

#### Jerry L. Maske, Petitioner v. Valerie Estrada, et al.

562 U.S. 964, 131 S. Ct. 459,

178 L. Ed. 2d 292,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7926.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
#### Doral Fabrics, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Cheryl Gold, Individually and as Preliminary Executrix of the Estate of *561Eugene P. Gold, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[67 NYS3d 627]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered September 27, 2016, which granted defendants Cheryl Gold and Amy Kaufman Gold’s and UBS AG’s motions to dismiss the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The complaint fails to state a cause of action for fraud (see *Mandarin Trading Ltd. v Wildenstein,*16 NY3d 173, 178 [2011]). The first step of the purported fraud, that the decedent, Eugene P. Gold, “diverted” income from plaintiff Barker-Doral Fabrics, Inc., did not constitute fraud; rather, as the complaint alleges elsewhere, it was embezzlement.

The second step of the scheme, the sham loan of the diverted funds to plaintiff Doral Fabrics, Inc., would fulfil the requirements of fraud but for the fact that the decedent was the president and sole shareholder of Doral at the time of the loan; as such, his knowledge is imputed to it *(see 546-552 W. 146th St. LLC v Arfa,*54 AD3d 543, 544 [1st Dept 2008], *lv dismissed in part, denied in part*12 NY3d 840 [2009]). Thus, Doral cannot have been deceived; it knew that the loan was a sham. Contrary to plaintiffs’ claim, there is record support for defendants’ argument that the decedent was Doral’s sole shareholder at the relevant time.

Because the complaint fails to state a cause of action for fraud, it is not necessary to consider whether the fraud claim is time-barred and whether New York has jurisdiction over defendant UBS.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Sweeny, Gische, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
April Prepareathon week #2: mass communication systems and celebrating telecommunicator week
 
  By Rick Zucchero, installation emergency manager, DLA Installation Management Susquehanna
  In week one we discussed common severe spring weather events for the central Pennsylvania area and the difference between a tornado watch and a warning. This week we want to make sure you can receive timely messages to prepare for and take immediate life-saving actions during an event. Have you ever felt like you were the last to know?  I’m sure at one point or another, all of us had an experience like that. Fortunately, thanks to the substantial advancements in technology, there are many ways to receive timely notifications to prepare us for an event or facilitate immediate protective actions. Know Your Alerts and Warnings Defense Logistics Agency’s Mass Warning Notification System is designed to provide notifications through multiple delivery systems such as the building public address systems and outdoor speakers. Additionally, the software application AtHoc is used to provide messages through government computers and phones, as well as personal phones. You control your method of delivery such as text messaging, or voice notification via government and/or personal phones, email and the new AtHoc mobile APP!  We encourage everyone to sign up for AtHoc messaging as Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna may utilize AtHoc for events like: Flooding – requires temporary use of alternative Access Control Point
 Severe weather – facilitates delayed opening, early dismissal, or closing of installation as well as reopening
 Accident or incident near the installation involving a hazardous material spill resulting in an evacuation or shelter-in-place order
 Terrorist threat or activity requiring an installation lockdown For more information see the attached flyers on receiving alerts and warnings, updating your AtHoc contact information and getting the AtHoc mobile APP! Telecommunicator week Of course, none of this timely and vital communication could take place without our Emergency Communication dispatchers!  This week is a time to celebrate and thank emergency service dispatchers across the nation who remain at the ready 24/7/365. The dedicated professionals assigned to Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna are always ready to execute routine or emergency support for the installation and local community.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34489-34490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324]


Carolina Power & Light Company; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Carolina Power & Light Company (the licensee) to 
withdraw its May 23, 1997, application for proposed amendment to 
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-71 and DPR-62 for the Brunswick 
Steam Electric Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, located in Brunswick County, 
North Carolina.
    The proposed amendment would have reduced the short-term limit for 
Dose Equivalent I-131 activity in the reactor coolant from 4.0 
microcuries/gram to 3.0 microcuries/gram.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on July 30, 
1997 (62 FR 40847). However, by letter dated April 17, 1998, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated May 23, 1997, and the licensee's letter 
dated April 17, 1998, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. The above documents are available for public inspection at 
the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L 
Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room 
located at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, William 
Madison Randall Library, 601 S. College

[[Page 34490]]

Road, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-3297.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day of June 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David C. Trimble,
Project Manager, Project Directorate II-1, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II , Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-16743 Filed 6-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03217**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 03217\03217_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03217\03217_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 03217\03217_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03217\03217_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03217\03217_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03217\Certification Statement Plant ID 03217.pdf Plant certification statement x 03217\Supplemental Documents\Flow Diagram 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03217\Supplemental Documents\Flow diagram WPDES copy.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03217\Supplemental Documents\one mile radius 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03217\Supplemental Documents\one mile radius.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CoBizFinancial Inc.**

**Certification**

** **

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of CoBiz Financial Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2009 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | February 19, 2010 | /s/ Steven Bangert |
|--------|------------------------|--------------------|
|   |                   | Steven Bangert     |
|   |                   | Chairman and CEO   |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Craig J. Cerny, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harrington West FinancialGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: November 9, 2007                                                              /s/ Craig J. Cerny   Craig J. Cerny,   Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-5502.

#### Oscar Javier Beltran-Lastra, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 925, 131 S. Ct. 310,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7304.

178 L. Ed. 2d 201,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*202Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 534.