alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-6402.

#### Van Cleve Ashley, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 987, 131 S. Ct. 428,

178 L. Ed. 2d 333,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8224.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 606 F.3d 135.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 15, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Cobra
Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 Nos. 333-32609 (effective August 1, 1997), 333-63501
(effective September 16, 1998), 333-42164 (effective July 25, 2000), 333-42166 (effective July 25, 2000) and 333-91078 (effective
June 24, 2002).

/s/
Grant Thornton LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
March 15, 2010

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-5655.

#### David L. Reynolds, Petitioner v. Supreme Court of Virginia.

562 U.S. 964, 131 S. Ct. 460,

178 L. Ed. 2d 293,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8087.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 320.
No. 10-292.

#### Oscar Perez, et al., Petitioners v. Carey International, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 964, 131 S. Ct. 480,

178 L. Ed. 2d 291,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8061.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*292Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 907.
#### People v Beverly

3d Dept: 140 AD3d 1400 (Albany)

denied 8/16/16 (DiFiore, Ch. J.)
No. 10-5669.

#### Mario Salazar, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 934, 131 S. Ct. 334,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7257.

178 L. Ed. 2d 217,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 36 So. 3d 100.
# New award recognizes dedication of DLA’s frontline workers during pandemic

/ Published May 30, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
A new lapel pin and certificate will soon be awarded to Defense Logistics Agency employees who regularly worked on-site or contributed to essential missions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Called the Frontline Hero Pin, the award covers work done by civilian employees between March 2020 through May 2022. About 9,000 employees are expected to receive the pin, said Joe Davenport, who manages the DLA Honorary Awards Program.

Eligibility is determined by approval authorities based on the nature of the qualifying COVID-19 operation or activity. Approval authorities include commanders or deputy commanders of major subordinate commands or directorates, the agency chief of staff and regional commanders.

The recognition was a joint development between DLA Human Resources and major subordinate commands to honor employees such as distribution process workers who helped the agency send lifesaving supplies to Defense Department and federal customers, Davenport said.

Employees’ work included equipping mobile hospitals and nursing homes with masks and gloves, distributing test kits and vaccinations, and even replenishing the Strategic National Stockpile.

“I encourage you to celebrate the remarkable resilience, extraordinary courage and exemplary devotion to duty that our employees demonstrated during this unprecedented period of uncertainty,” DLA Human Resources Director Sharyn Saunders said in a May 23 message to senior leaders announcing authorization of the award.

Pins and certificates have been sent to local organizations for distribution, but leaders are still determining recipients and signing certificates, Davenport added.

DLA’s awards team coordinated with the Institute of Heraldry to produce the pin design, which began with six prototypes. The pin is silver and epoxy and includes the DLA emblem.
# DLA Aviation commander speaks about “Future of Logistics” during annual Tinker and the Primes Conference

/ Published Aug. 17, 2021
Richmond, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. David Sanford spoke on a panel focusing on the “Future of Logistics” during the 15th annual Tinker and the Primes conference on Aug. 10.

The conference theme, “Leveraging Partnerships to Accelerate Change,” was held Aug. 10-12 at the Reed Conference Center, Midwest City, Oklahoma.  Conference attendees participated in a variety of briefings and panel discussions over the three-day conference ranging from the needs of prime contractors and the Defense Department to learning how to secure government contracts as a small business.

Sanford discussed DLA’s pursuits in additive manufacturing and artificial intelligence/machine learning, diving into how new technology is allowing industry to increase speed and adaptability in supporting the warfighter.

“This conference truly displays DLA’s, the services’ and this state’s commitment to excellence in supporting our men and women on the front lines,” he said.

Other panel participants included with Leigh Method, deputy assistant secretary of defense for logistics; Geoffrey Camp, state director aerospace and defense for Oklahoma; and Dennis D’Angelo, executive director, Air Force Sustainment Center.
#### In the Matter of James Pettus, Petitioner, v Fernando Tapia et al., Respondents.

[64 NYS3d 544]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Oing and Singh, JJ.
No. 09-11548.

#### Alcides Rodriguez-Duran, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 887, 131 S. Ct. 218,

178 L. Ed. 2d 131,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6973.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
# CENTCOM senior leader visits DLA Energy Middle East

/ Published Sept. 24, 2015
BAHRAIN, 
The U.S. Central Command Deployment and Distribution Operations Center director visited Defense Logistics Agency Energy Middle East facilities at Naval Support Activity Bahrain Sept. 17.During her visit, Navy Rear Adm. Valerie Huegel toured multiple DLA Energy Middle East buildings, spoke to employees, presented DLA Energy Middle East employees Chancley Meadows and Phillips Adams with CDDOC Director’s Coins for Excellence and received a briefing by the Middle East commander, Army Col. Marc Thoreson.“The daily synchronization of information between both CDDOC and DLA Energy Middle East is a critical function to ensure all stakeholders have visibility of all bulk fuel movement in Iraq and across the area of operation,” Thoreson said.One way the two organizations synchronize information is through the DLA Energy Middle East’s daily situational report.“I read your DLA Energy Middle East daily SITREP every day,” Huegel said when meeting with DLA Energy Middle East Customer Operations personnel responsible for generating the bulk fuel comprehensive daily report.  Army Sgt. 1st Class Antwan Stanley, DLA Energy Middle East Petroleum Operations noncommissioned officer in charge, said it was nice talking to the rear admiral about the organization’s daily SITREP and to have her say she reads it every day.  “A large portion of our time in Customer Operations is dedicated to producing the daily SITREP, and it was good to hear that it is used by the commands we distribute it too,” he added.While presenting DLA Energy Middle East employees with coins, Huegel said she has the utmost respect for all technical experts, including contracting specialists, with the technical expertise and professional commitment necessary to ensure contract language fully supports the validated warfighter requirements.  The CDDOC director is responsible for ensuring the synchronization and optimization of strategic and theater multi-modal resources to maximize distribution, force movement and sustainment logistics.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15810]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, June 17, 1998.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement that not only 
lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information 
about the meeting.

    Dated: June 10, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15810 Filed 6-10-98; 11:08 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
No. 09-11058.

#### Michael Apelt, Petitioner v. Arizona.

562 U.S. 860, 131 S. Ct. 135,

178 L. Ed. 2d 82,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6134.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Arizona, Pinal County, denied.
#### People v Hunt

1st Dept: 145 AD3d 550 (NY)

denied 3/14/17 (Fahey, J.)
No. 10-5896.

#### Adam Eugene Martin, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 941, 131 S. Ct. 357,

178 L. Ed. 2d 231,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7182.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 395.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Latik Nelson, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 670]—

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered May 31, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2526 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2526

  To prohibit any charges on telephone bills for calls to 800 numbers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 6 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

 Mr. Harkin (for himself and Mr. Simon) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit any charges on telephone bills for calls to 800 numbers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:
            (1) Reforms required by the Telephone Disclosure and 
        Dispute Resolution Act (Public Law 102-556) have improved the 
        reputation of the pay-per-call industry and resulted in 
        regulations that have reduced the incidence of misleading 
        practices that are harmful to the public interest.
            (2) Among the successful reforms is a prohibition on 
        charges being assessed for calls to 800 telephone numbers or 
        other telephone numbers advertised or widely understood to be 
        toll free.
            (3) Nevertheless, certain interstate pay-per-call 
        businesses are taking advantage of an exception in the 
        prohibition on charging for information conveyed during a call 
        to a ``toll-free'' number to continue to engage in misleading 
        practices. These practices are not in compliance with the 
        intent of Congress in passing the Telephone Disclosure and 
        Dispute Resolution Act.
            (4) Therefore, it is necessary for Congress to clarify that 
        its intent is that charges for information provided during a 
        call to an 800 number or other number widely advertised and 
        understood to be toll free shall not, under any circumstances, 
        be included or transmitted with a bill for telephone services.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 228(c)(6)(C) of the Communications Act of 
1934 (47 U.S.C. 228(c)(6)(C)) is amended by inserting before the 
semicolon the following: ``, except that nothing in this paragraph 
shall permit the calling party to be charged for the information or the 
call by means of a charge included on, or transmitted with, a bill for 
telephone exchange service or telephone toll service''.
    (b) Regulations.--The Federal Communications Commission shall 
revise its regulations to comply with the amendment made by subsection 
(a) of this section within 30 days after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### People v Franklin

4th Dept: 141 AD3d 1103 (Monroe)

denied 8/31/16 (DiFiore, Ch. J.)
# Workman retires after 32 years of total federal service

/ Published Dec. 10, 2021
CAMP HUMPHREYS, Korea, 
Army Col. Brian Donahue, Defense Logistics Agency Indo-Pacific military deputy commander, recognized Carl Workman, DLA IP Area IV warfighter support representative, for his 15-plus years of service to DLA Nov. 19 during a retirement ceremony at the DLA IP Korea facility Camp Humphreys, Korea.

Workman was presented with a Distinguished Career Service Award for his federal service as a DLA employee.  He first served as a sales representative contracting officer and as a disposition service representative for DLA Disposition Services and later with DLA IP as a warfighter support representative.

Workman was recognized as a logistics leader who significantly improved the Agency’s support around the world.  He was instrumental in providing comprehensive logistics support across DLA's lines of support sustaining the forward logistics Headquarters. “Carl, we thank you for your service to the warfighter and to our nation. You made a remarkable difference and leave behind a legacy,” Donahue said.  John O’Connor, Asiana Chief, added “Carl demonstrated sustained superior performance and a total dedication to duty.”

Workman and his wife, Sun, plan to resettle in Columbus, Indiana.
# Susquehanna child and youth program conducts training; continues excellence

/ Published Dec. 21, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Employees of the Defense Logistics Agency Susquehanna Morale, Welfare and Recreation Child and Youth Program conducted a large in person training event 7 Oct, 2022 at DLA Distribution Headquarters.

The Susquehanna CYP is an accredited program and child-care center located on the DLA Distribution Susquehanna installation. All CYP programs are designed to enrich the social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and intellectual growth and development of enrolled children.

“I love working here because of the impact I can make on the children. I feel I am given a variety of tasks and responsibilities that provide me the opportunity to learn and grow as an educator,” said Janelle Hill, CYS program assistant.

The focus of training was Kids Included Together, a long-time partnered training curriculum focused on inclusion. KIT training focuses in on how the care takes, considered the teachers of the children, are also still learners, learning the newest and best methods to ensure every child’s needs are met.

“I love working at CYP because I have the opportunity to be a fun and amazing teacher to children of the warfighter and the support staff of the warfighter,” said Tash Palmer, lead CYP, speaking to the overall mission of DLA “warfighter always”.

Information regarding eligibility, enrollment and other frequently asked questions can be found on the Susquehanna Child and Youth Program page.
No. 10-6150.

#### Vincent Lee Foreman, Petitioner v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 986, 131 S. Ct. 425,

178 L. Ed. 2d 331,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8228.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 366 Fed. Appx. 468.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         896,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,031,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (219,554)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,964,356
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,174,897
<PP&E>                                       3,008,627
<DEPRECIATION>                               (178,157)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,579,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,439,389
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       327,333
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,407,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,579,909
<SALES>                                     17,503,027
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,503,027
<CGS>                                       13,083,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,083,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,451,671
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             304,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,336,677)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (36,595)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,300,082)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,300,082)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Jerome J. Maxwell, Respondent, v Kereen Watt, Appellant.

[59 NYS3d 81]

Appeal by the mother from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Marybeth S. Richroath, J.), dated May 4, 2016. The order, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition to modify a prior order of custody of that court (Margaret M. Mulrooney, Ct. Atty. Ref.) dated November 28, 2011, so as to award him residential custody of the parties’ child.

Ordered that the order dated May 4, 2016, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The parties are the parents of one child, born in 2001. In an order dated November 28, 2011, the Family Court, upon the parties’ consent, awarded the parties joint legal custody of the child, with residential custody to the mother. In July 2015, the father filed a petition to modify the order so as to award him residential custody. In the order appealed from, the court granted the father’s petition. The mother appeals.

Modification of an existing custody order is permissible only upon a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that modification is necessary to ensure the continued best interests of the child *(see Matter of Vujanic v Petrovic,*125 AD3d 984, 985 [2015]; *Matter of Davis v Pignataro,*97 AD3d 677, 677 [2012]; *Trinagel v Boyar,*70 AD3d 816, 816 [2010]). In determining whether such a change exists, the court must consider the totality of the circumstances *(see Matter of Connolly v Walsh,*126 AD3d 691, 693 [2015]). The wishes of the child are not controlling but are entitled to great weight where the child’s age and maturity would make the child’s input particularly meaningful *(see Matter of Coull v Rottman,*131 AD3d 964, 964 [2015]). Here, contrary to the mother’s contention, considering the totality of the circumstances, including the child’s wishes, the Family Court’s determination that there had been a change in circumstances requiring a transfer of residential custody to the father in order to ensure the best interests of the child has a sound and substantial basis in the *694record. Therefore, the court’s determination will not be disturbed *(see Matter of Oyefeso v Sully,*148 AD3d 710, 712 [2017]).

Balkin, J.P., Roman, Sgroi and Duffy, JJ., concur.