alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34156-34157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16598]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER98-441-000, ER98-1019-000, and ER98-2550-000; ER98-495-
000, ER98-1614-000, and ER98-2145-000; ER98-496-000 and ER98-2160-000; 
ER98-441-001, and ER98-495-001, ER98-496-001 consolidated]


Southern California Edison Company, California Independent System 
Operator Corp., El Segundo Power, LLC, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, 
San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company, 
Pacific Gas & Electric Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company; 
Notice of Informal Settlement Conference

June 17, 1998.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened

[[Page 34157]]

in the subject proceedings on Monday, June 29, 1998, at 9:00 AM, EDT, 
through Wednesday, July 1, 1998. The conference will be held at the 
offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant, as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), may attend. Persons wishing to become a 
party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status pursuant to 
Section 385.214 of the Commission's Regulations.
    For additional information, please contact Paul B. Mohler at (202) 
208-1240, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7808190d1456151710141d0a381e1d0a1b561e1d1c560d0b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7b7a6b2abe9aaa8afaba2b587a1a2b5a4e9a1a2a3e9b2b4">[email protected]</span></a>.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16598 Filed 6-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Distribution Susquehanna’s Shipment Planning Team of the Quarter

/ Published April 13, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Susquehanna’s, Shipment Planning Team has been awarded the Team of the Quarter award for outstanding customer support and stewardship of resources.

The shipment planning team continuously excels in demonstrating great dedication in the performance of duties.  The team is responsible for various operations to include container booking, oversight of the dedicated truck program and ensuring prompt and accurate payment of transportation bills.  

During the first quarter, the Shipment Planning Team worked directly with Surface Deployment Distribution Command and DLA Distribution in the development and implementation of procedures to process the diplomatic notes required for containers destined to Iraq.  Their work highlighted an enterprise-wide customs issue and the team was integral in developing a resolution to ensure expedient transit of cargo to US Forces in Iraq.  In best efforts to show continuous cost savings across the dedicated truck program, the Shipment Planning Team rendered a cost savings of $1.9 million.

In preparation of the audit for the order to cash business cycle, the Shipment Planning Team spent countless hours addressing evidential matter concerns with J4/J3 AR/PS Teams.  Many of their proposed changes were implemented across DLA and will save thousands of dollars enterprise- wide in terms of supplies used and hours worked.

“The shipment planning team continuously meets unexpected challenges through the course of their workday, yet they maintain a high level of motivation and second- to- none quality,” said Michelle McClure, Chief, Shipment Planning Branch.
```

[Federal Register: May 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 103)]
[Notices]               
[Page 29996]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28my10-51]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date:  Wednesday, June 2, 2010; 2 p.m.-4 p.m.

Place:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status:  Closed to the Public.

Matters To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: May 25, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13064 Filed 5-26-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
# Ben Richardson

/ Published Feb. 1, 2021

Ben Richardson is an energy transition enthusiast and national security expert. He recently transitioned from an advisory role to Chief Commercial Officer at Gambit, a venture backed defense startup. The previous year he helped grow the battery startup, Our Next Energy, through its first year of revenue and build numerous strategic partnerships.

This followed a three-year tour as an activated military reservist establishing Defense Innovation Unit's newest technology vertical focused on the energy sector. While at DIU, he built a team of 40 energy professionals and started nearly 30 projects, ranging from emobility (air, land, sea), long duration storage, advanced aviation designs, alternative battery chemistries, on-site power generation (solar, wind, geothermal), hydrogen, battery recycling, hazardous material management, power management and optimization, and remote power generation.

Prior to joining DIU, Richardson served in various senior positions in the Pentagon to include the Director of Critical Technology Protection in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security and the Director of Global Markets and Investments in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. In these roles, he developed and promulgated policies and oversaw the associated budgets and workforce to protect DoD's critical technologies. In addition, Ben served as the DoD lead on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.

Outside of his government experience, Richardson has also been a consultant with Protiviti, an internal audit and risk-consulting firm, primarily supporting due diligence for private equity clients. Richardson started his career as an intelligence officer in the Marine Corps, to include multiple overseas tours. He continues to serve as a Lieutenant Colonel in the Marine Corps Reserves where he has held multiple positions with the Intelligence Community, including teaching at the National Intelligence University.

Richardson holds a Bachelor of Science degree in International Affairs with a minor in History from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Master of Business Administration in Finance from Hofstra University, a Master of Science in Strategic Intelligence from the National Intelligence University, and a Master of Science in National Resource Strategy from the National Defense University. In addition, he was a Senior Executive Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgans Foods, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provided reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of August 17, 2008, based on such evaluation; andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during registrants second fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: October 1, 2008
    /s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-SapirChairman of the Board,

Chief Executive Officer
#### People v Ramdass

App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists: 51 Misc 3d 138(A) (Queens)

denied 8/25/16 (Fahey, J.)
No. 10-6460.

#### Ted Marcum, Petitioner v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority.

562 U.S. 1015, 131 S. Ct. 532,

178 L. Ed. 2d 391,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8523.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Calendar No. 577

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2380

A BILL

To encourage serious negotiations between the

Series.the baseball season, the playoffs, and the Worldthe fans will be able to enjoy the remainder ofby the players or a lockout by the owners so thatmajor league baseball in order to prevent a strikemajor league baseball players and the owners of

AUGUST 18, 1994

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
II

Calendar No. 577

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2380

To encourage serious negotiations between the major league baseball players

and the owners of major league baseball in order to prevent a strike

by the players or a lockout by the owners so that the fans will be

able to enjoy the remainder of the baseball season, the playoffs, and

the World Series.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 11, 1994

Mr. METZENBAUM (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. FEINGOLD, and Mr. PELL)

introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

AUGUST 18, 1994

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To encourage serious negotiations between the major league

baseball players and the owners of major league baseball

in order to prevent a strike by the players or a lockout

by the owners so that the fans will be able to enjoy

the remainder of the baseball season, the playoffs, and

the World Series.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 2380 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baseball Fans Protec3 tion Act of 1994’’.

4 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF THE ANTITRUST LAWS TO MAJOR

5 LEAGUE BASEBALL IN EXCEPTIONAL AND EX6 TRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES.

7 The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) is amended

8 by adding at the end the following new section:

9 ‘‘SEC. 27. (a) IN GENERAL.—In the event that a uni10 lateral term or condition is imposed by any party that has

11 been subject to an agreement between the owners of major

12 league baseball and the labor organization representing

13 the players of major league baseball, the antitrust laws

14 shall apply to that term or condition.

15 ‘‘(b) TERMINATION OF EFFECTIVENESS.—Sub16 section (a) shall cease to be effective upon the mutual

17 adoption of an agreement between the owners of major

18 league baseball and the labor organization representing

19 the players of major league baseball to replace the basic

20 agreement between the two parties that expired on Decem21 ber 31, 1993, but subsection (a) shall continue to apply

22 to conduct occurring prior to the adoption of such an

23 agreement.

24 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, ‘term or condi25 tion’ does not include a strike or a lockout.’’.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.8



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John T. Baker IV, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ John T. Baker IV



John T. Baker IV
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary Williams, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 877]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered November 5, 2001, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree, incest, and menacing in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant challenges several comments made by the prosecutor during his summation. However, the challenges are, for the most part, unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Ravenell,*307 AD2d 977 [2003]; *People v Shelton,*307 AD2d 370, 372 [2003], *lv granted*100 NY2d 626 [2003]). In any event, the prosecutor’s comments either were fair comment on the evidence, permissive rhetorical comment, responsive to the defense counsel’s summation, or not so prejudicial as to constitute reversible error *(see People v Hoover,*298 AD2d 599 [2002]; *People v Lewis,*140 AD2d 714 [1988]).

The defendant also contends that the trial court’s supplemental charge defining “reasonable doubt” for the jury was improper. However, the trial transcript has since been properly resettled to reflect that the challenged portions of the charge represented transcription errors *(see People v Scott,*197 AD2d 646, 647 [1993]; *cf. People v Laracuente,*125 AD2d 705 [1986]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Smith and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                                   APR-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1998  
<CASH>                                           152,423,000 
<SECURITIES>                                               0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      1,991,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (451,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          170,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     406,000 
<PP&E>                                             3,312,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (389,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   186,780,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             11,238,000 
<BONDS>                                                    0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0 
<PREFERRED>                                                0 
<COMMON>                                             132,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                       175,410,000 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     186,780,000 
<SALES>                                               83,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   3,812,000 
<CGS>                                                 71,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      3,173,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   6,291,000 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (10,007,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (10,007,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0 
<CHANGES>                                                  0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     (10,007,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (.76)     
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.76)     
                                         

</TABLE>
Recruiting the next generation of warfighter support at DLA Aviation at Ogden
 
  By Leon Moore, Public Affairs Specialist
  Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Ogden Chief of Staff Andrew Bingham was joined by Joe Grant, division chief for DLA Aviation at Ogden’s Storage and Distribution Division and Management Assistant Katie Wolfe, manning the DLA booth during a career fair held in Ogden, Utah, Jan. 24. Bingham said the trio answered questions and shared information about employment opportunities available at DLA Aviation at Ogden with the more than 800 people who attended the fair.
# Phased retirement rules for DLA employees still in development

/ Published Aug. 16, 2016

Defense Logistics Agency Human Resources officials are working to develop and publish the final rules for implementing the “phased retirement” option in the agency.

Phased retirement allows agencies to permit, on a case-by-case basis, federal employees who are eligible for full retirement to transition to part-time employment while drawing a partial retirement annuity before completely withdrawing from the workforce. DLA employees have been waiting for implementation of phased retirement since it was signed into federal law in 2012. The Office of Personnel Management issued phased retirement regulations in late 2014, and Defense Department personnel officials issued a directive-type memorandum on phased retirement in June of this year.

“Now that the memo has been signed and we have concrete guidance on implementing phased retirement in DoD agencies, we’ve begun drafting the DLA instruction for implementing this option in DLA,” said Laurie Hall, a human resources specialist in DLA Human Resources Policy. 

She noted the DoD rules provide agencies discretion to set parameters around how they'll use the authority, such as determining who has delegated authority to approve phased retirements and how the mentoring component will be defined and tracked.

DLA Human Resources officials have urged patience from employees who hope to participate in the phased retirement option, as several conditions will need to be met in order for the arrangement to be approved on a case-by-case basis. 

“Obviously, this would have to make sense for both the employee (financially) and the agency from a mission standpoint, and would be the result of a mutual agreement between the employee and management,” DLA Human Resources Director Brad Bunn wrote in June in response to an employee question on the DLA Ask A Leader platform. 

The law also requires that phased retirees spend at least 20 percent of their time mentoring others. In this aspect, phased retirement will support Objective 6 of the People and Culture goal area of the DLA Strategic Plan for 2015-2022, which calls for developing a framework for effective succession management for key positions. 

Phased retirement is “essentially a succession management tool designed to assist with knowledge transfer, along with providing an opportunity to eligible employees to ‘ease’ into retirement,” Bunn wrote.

DLA Human Resources officials’ next steps are to consult with agency senior leaders on implementing the phased retirement authority in DLA, coordinate the draft DLA instruction, and meet collective bargaining obligations.  Ideally, phased retirement will be ready for implementation by the end of 2016, Hall said.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Clinical Research.
    Date: May 27, 1998.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.
    Place: Telephone Conference, Executive Plaza South, Room 350.
    Contact Person: Andrew P. Mariani, Ph.D., Executive Plaza South, 
Room 350, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7164, (301) 496-
5561.
    Purpose/Agenda: Review of Grant Applications.

    Name of SEP: Clinical Research.
    Date: May 29, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: National Eye Institute, Executive Plaza South, Room 350, 
6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7164.
    Contact Person: Andrew P. Mariani, Ph.D., Executive Plaza South, 
Room 350, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7164, (301) 496-
5561.
    Purpose/Agenda: Review of Grant Applications.
    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.867, Vision 
Research: National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: May 21, 1998.
LaVerne Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-14137 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M