alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-1 (SEC FILE NO.
333-18849) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REGISTRATION
STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       8,147,918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,209,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (60,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,992,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,473,588
<PP&E>                                         237,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (20,209)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,183,318
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,856,925
<BONDS>                                     19,568,449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (47,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,183,318
<SALES>                                     11,341,426
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,341,426
<CGS>                                        9,338,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,338,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               267,143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,981,022)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,981,022)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,981,022)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.39)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000

       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1,245
<SECURITIES>                                      6,842
<RECEIVABLES>                                    16,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                        577
<INVENTORY>                                      13,340
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 37,342
<PP&E>                                           55,943
<DEPRECIATION>                                   38,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   58,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            17,631
<BONDS>                                             161
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          1,342
<OTHER-SE>                                       40,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     58,553
<SALES>                                          17,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17,424
<CGS>                                            12,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     (4)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,007
<INCOME-TAX>                                        306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 701
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        701
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.60

        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15669]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-48-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

June 8, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 3, 1998, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing Title Pages as part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1 and Second Revised Volume No. 2, 
to be effective July 3, 1998.
    Natural states that the purpose of the filing is to reflect an 
address change and a name change regarding the contact person and the 
contact person's telephone and facsimile numbers.
    Natural requested waiver of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission's (Commission) Regulations to the extent necessary to permit 
the tendered Title Pages to become effective July 3, 1998, thirty (30) 
days from the date of the filing.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
Natural's customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15669 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### ROBERT RACINE v. MICHAEL MAHONEY.1

November 6, 1908.

Nos. 15,930—(54).

Action in the district court for Stevens county to recover $200, the unpaid balance upon the purchase price of certain land. The case was tried before Flaherty, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $212.65. From an order granting defendant’s motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

Affirmed.

*Geo. W. Beise,*for appellant.

*James B. Ormond,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 118 N. W. 64.

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought in the district court of the county of Stevens to recover $200, which the plaintiff claims was *due to him from the*defendant for the balance of the purchase price of land sold to him by the plaintiff. The answer alleged payment in full for the land. The evidence on the trial as to the issue of payment was radically conflicting; the defendant testifying directly and explicitly that he paid to the plaintiff the $200, stating time and place of payment and circumstances under which it was made. The plaintiff testified positively that the balance had not been paid, and denied the testimony of the defendant. Verdict for the plaintiff for the amount claimed. *538The trial court, on defendant’s motion, granted a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was not justified by the evidence. The plaintiff appealed from the order granting a new trial. The weight of the evidence was not palpably in favor of the verdict, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial.

Order affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Sanchez, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 881]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell *597Wiley, J.), rendered November 24, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber, Oing, JJ.
Fourth quarter employees of the quarter
 
  By DLA Energy Public Affairs
  Defense Logistics Agency Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Jimmy Canlas announced Energy’s fourth quarter, fiscal year 2021 military, civilian and strategic goals employees of the quarter. Congratulations to the Energy members selected to compete at the DLA 4th Quarter Military and Employee Recognition Program. Field Grade Officer Category:**Air Force Maj. Justin Bryant, DLA Energy Middle East** Company Grade Category:***Army Capt. Willard Lewman, DLA Energy Middle East** Senior NCO Category***Air Force Master Sgt. Lorenzo Cortez, DLA Energy Americas** Junior NCO Category:**Air Force Staff Sgt. Katy Ray, DLA Energy Americas** Category B (GS/WG/WL 7-12): **Melissa Rodriguez, DLA Energy Americas West** Category C (GS13-15/WS):**Daniel Schmidt, DLA Energy Americas West** DLA Director's Strategic Goals Award Category: Individual Award:**Jermon Henry, DLA Energy Middle East Logistics Management Specialist and liaison officer to Kuwait** Team Award:
DLA Energy Americas West Operation Allies Refuge/Operation Allies Welcome and Hurricane Ida Support Team **Navy Cmdr. Frank Kim
Tracy Keenan
Michael Koury
Bowdoin Swenson
Daniel Schmidt
Tim Hutson
Camillia Young
Christopher Christensen
James Strickland
Ken Smith
Melissa Rodriguez
Jennifer Bertone
Ebony Harvey
Christopher Damko
Nicholas Christensen
Jaime Sanchez
Christian Bobzien
James Robinson
Michael Lambrecht** *A big congratulations to these DLA Energy Service Members who won at DLA enterprise level in the 4th Quarter Military Recognition Program! 
“Please help us in congratulating them on their amazing accomplishment,” Canlas said in an email to the workforce. “Thanks for representing Energy so well!” The DLA enterprise level civilian employee winners have not been announced. “Congrats to all our Energy award winners,” said Air Force Brig. Gen. Jimmy Canlas in an email to the workforce. “Thanks to the supervisors for highlighting our outstanding teammates.”
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1636]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Shipco International, Inc., 12270 W. Colonial Dr. #109, Winter Garden, 
FL 34787, Officers: M. Wael Shrourou, President; Mona Z. Shrourou, 
Secretary
B.R.A.L. Miami Inc., 6120 N.W. 74 Avenue, Miami, FL 33166, Officers: 
Alvaro Cruz, President, Humberto Briceno, Vice President
Service Shipping, Inc., 38104 Academy Drive, Lake Villa, IL 60046, 
Officers: William James Marston, President, Patricia A. Taylor, 
Secretary
Interline Corporation, 2205 East Carson Street, Unit B-4, Long Beach, 
CA 90810, Officers: Junichi Jim Shioda, President, Kenichi Shioda, Vice 
President
Forwarding Services International, Inc., One Water Ridge Plaza, 2201 
Water, Ridge Parkway, Suite 500, Charlotte, NC 28217, Officers: James 
D. McClaskey, Director, Paul L. Carter, Director
Premier Freight Forwarders, Inc., 9423 Tradeport Drive, Orlando, FL 
32827, Officers: David G. Smith, President, William C. O'Fallon.

    Dated: January 20, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1636 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
No. 09-11262.

#### Timothy B. Wilder, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 870, 131 S. Ct. 169,

178 L. Ed. 2d 101,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6461.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 597 F.3d 936.
RE: EGU MACT inquiry Higgins, Cortney to: Bill Maxwell 03/02/2011 01:27 PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Jeb Stenhouse, Kevin Culligan

Hi Bob, I'll forward the response to Holmes -- thanks!

Cortney

-----Original Message----- From: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 1:26 PM To: Higgins, Cortney Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov; Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov; Culligan.Kevin@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Re: EGU MACT inquiry

Cortney:

The e-mail below came in as a result of the interagency review of the Toxics Rule package. We weren't sure whether you'd rather forward the response to Holmes or whether you'd rather we respond directly.

The answer is the new-source MACT floor number for Hg is 0.00001 lb/GWh.

There is, indeed, a large difference between the existing- and new-source floor values due to the construct of the statute (i.e., top performing 12 percent for existing vs. top single performer for new) and the difference becomes larger the more units are included in the "top performing 12 percent" pool.

We are working to get you the MACT floor TSD and the supporting spreadsheets.

Thanks.

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5430
FAX: 919-541-5450

From: "Hummel, Holmes" <Holmes.Hummel@hq.doe.gov> To: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 03/01/2011 08:57 PMSubject: EGU MACT inquiry

Hi Jeb,

I'm pouring over the EGU MACT comments coming in from the energy program offices at DOE, and I am puzzled by what appears to be a very, very stringent Hg standard for new plants.

Is it at all possible that EPA intended the Hg MACT floor for new sources to be 0.00001 lb/MWh rather than 0.00001 lb/GWh? - or would you
let me know who I should ask?

The standards between existing and new appear to be ~3 orders of magnitude apart, which is raising curiosity/concern. I'd like to avoid preparing extensive comments on something that boils down to unit
labels.

Holmes
DocketNo: FAA-2014-0070 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-062-AD Originating Office Tracking No.: Disposition Comments

Next Step: 0FRAN 0SNPRM 

## D These comments are in response to an SNPRM


## D No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received- 

### If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No Has the referenced service infonnation been revised since the NPRM was issued? 

### Ifyes, list latest revision and attach a copy. 

### Note that changes beyondthe scope of thepreviously publishedNPRMwi/1 require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focalpoint.forguidance
. Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (notby com'rnenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue
. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all ofthe issues from one commentertogether. Ifchanges to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend
. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.\C Chapter 9. ISSUE 1: 

### Select one of the following: compliance time 

### If

other, explain: Commenter(s): Luc Murphy, Bell Helicopter What change to the AD action is requested? The Commenterperceives that the FAANPRM is more stringent for certain inspectionrequirements than either the MCAI orthe OEM ASB 407..:11-95, Revision C dated April20, 2012. Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? The perceived more stringent inspection interval will impose an additional burdento operators without any additional safety benefits. Do we agree? No IfYES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: IfNO, we don't agree because The NPRM corrective actions are the same as the MCAI and the ASB. However, NPRM, ASB, and MCAI are arranged and worderd differently although the mandatory requirements are the same. Consequently, the perception appears to be based on the fonnat ofthe NPR.t\tl. Commenter lists the following differences:

- - -Strap doublers (but not new longeron) are installed. The commenter states the ASB and MCAI allow increasing the

**inspectio~** interval to 150 hours. Howwever, according to the ASB, this is only acceptable providing the longeron and the top skin must be free ofdefects and shall not carry any type ofrepair. The ASB and the MCAI only address the expanded inspection interVal but not specifically address the inspection interval ifthe longeron or skin is not 

### free ofdefects or carry some type ofrepair. NPRM (e)(4) states ifinspection finds no crack in the upper skin and no crack, corrosion, or other dama ge in the longeron assembly, you may install three external strap doublers per the ASB, which allows increasing the Page 1 of30 } Signature Section Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

ASE PrintedNllme: Sharon Miles Date 

# Oj J-tj:l& ( Date



### Page 3 of3
EXHIBIT 31.2RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002I, Russell Van Zandt certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Veridien Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth physical quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 19, 2006    /s/ Russell Van Zandt    Russell Van Zandt       Chief Financial Officer  
18
2017-0638.

#### Struckman v. Teays Valley Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

Pickaway App. No. 16CA10, 2017-Ohio-1177. On motion to remand. Motion denied.
# DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM, DLA Energy Middle East bids Cruz farewell

/ Published Sept. 1, 2020
MACDILL AFB, FL , 
DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM and DLA Energy Middle East said goodbye to Edwin J. Cruz during a retirement ceremony July 31 at MacDill AFB, Florida. Cruz retired after 34 years of honorable service to our Nation and the Department of Defense.

Cruz served the past 10 years as a DLA Energy liaison officer to Central Command Joint Petroleum Office and previously served 24 years in the U.S. Army.

Colonel Hattie Richardson, DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM Commander, officiated the outdoor ceremony near the CENTCOM building where family, friends and co-workers were able to attend.

Cruz was presented the DLA Distinguished Career Service Award, coins from the DLA Director of Logistics Operations, DLA Energy Commander and DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM Commander and gifts from DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM, DLA Energy Middle East and Central Command J4 (Logistics & Engineering Directorate).

Cruz offered farewell wishes for the audience and a special thank you to his family.
Exhibit 10.6

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$253,000 September 16, 2002

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd. and
Zenascent, Inc. (collectively, the "Company"), jointly and severally, hereby
promise to pay to the order of Cedric Kushner ("Kushner") the principal sum of
TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($253,000) in lawful money of the
United States of America in immediately available funds on or before September
15, 2005 (the "Maturity Date").

Any outstanding principal amount shall accrue interest at a per annum rate equal
to 7% (compounded annually based on a 365-day year), commencing on the date
hereof and ending on the Maturity Date.

Company hereby waives diligence, presentment, demand, protest and notice of any
kind whatsoever. The nonexercise by Kushner of any of its rights hereunder in
any particular instance shall not constitute a waiver thereof in that or any
subsequent instance. Company shall pay on demand all reasonable out-of-pocket
costs and expenses of collection, including reasonable attorney fees incurred or
paid by Kushner in enforcing this Promissory Note.

This Promissory Note shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the
laws of the State of New York. Company hereby irrevocably (i) agrees that any
litigation, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Promissory
Note may be instituted in any state or federal court in the State of New York
and (ii) waives any objection which it may have to the venue of any such
litigation, action or proceeding and by its signature below consents to the
personal jurisdiction of such courts if litigation is initiated to collect the
sums due under this Promissory Note.

This Promissory Note cannot be modified except by a written instrument signed by
each of Company and Kushner.

CEDRIC KUSHNER PROMOTIONS, LTD.





By: /s/James DiLorenzo
    ----------------------------
Name: James DiLorenzo
Title:   President



ZENASCENT, INC.





By: /s/ James DiLorenzo
    ----------------------------
Name: James DiLorenzo
Title:   Executive Vice President