Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 76235 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this rule under that Order and have 

determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INTFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This rule will not affect a taking of 

private property or otherwise have 

taking implications under Executive 

Order 12630, Governmental Actions and 

Interference with Constitutionally 

Protected Property Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This rule meets applicable standards 

in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

10. Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under Executive Order 

13211, Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have determined this action is one of a 

category of actions which do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves 

establishing a safety zone. This rule is 

categorically excluded from further 

review under paragraph (34)(g) of Figure 

2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination and a 

Categorical Exclusion Determination are 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, and 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701; 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T05–1032 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T05–1032 Safety Zone, Elizabeth 

River; Portsmouth, VA. 

(a) Definitions. For the purposes of 

this section, Captain of the Port means 

the Commander, Sector Hampton Roads. 

Representative means any Coast Guard 

commissioned, warrant or petty officer 

who has been authorized to act on the 

behalf of the Captain of the Port. 

(b) Location. The following area is a 

safety zone: specified waters of the 

Captain of the Port Sector Hampton 

Roads zone, as defined in 33 CFR 3.25– 

10: The marked channel of the Elizabeth 

River between Elizabeth River Channel 

Buoy 31 (LLNR 9835) and Elizabeth 

River Channel Buoy 34 (LLNR 9855). 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in § 165.23 of 

this part, entry into this zone is 

prohibited unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or 

his designated Representative. 

(2) The operator of any vessel in the 

immediate vicinity of this safety zone 

shall: 

(i) Contact on scene contracting 

vessels via VHF channel 13 and 16 for 

passage instructions. 

(ii) If on scene proceed as directed by 

any commissioned, warrant or petty 

officer on shore or on board a vessel that 

is displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign. 

(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton 

Roads can be reached through the Sector 

Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads 

in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone 

number (757) 668–5555. 

(4) The Coast Guard Representatives 

enforcing the safety zone can be 

contacted on VHF–FM marine band 

radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and 

channel 16 (156.8 Mhz). 

(d) Enforcement period. This section 

will be enforced for 10 periods of 48 

hours in length beginning at midnight 

on February 18, February 23, February 

26, March 3, March 9, April 20, April 

23, April 27, April 30, and May 11, 

2015. Any deviations from these times 

will be communicated via marine 

information broadcasts. 

Dated: December 8, 2014. 

Christopher S. Keane, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Hampton Roads. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29850 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2014–0674; FRL–9920–61– 

Region 4] 

Approval of Implementation Plans and 

Designation of Areas; Alabama; 

Redesignation of the Alabama Portion 

of the Chattanooga, 1997 p.m.2.5

Nonattainment Area to Attainment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

76236 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

1EPA designated the Chattanooga TN-GA-AL 

Area as nonattainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5

NAAQS on January 5, 2005 (70 FR 944) as 

supplemented on April 14, 2005 (70 FR 19844). 2On February 8, 2012, EPA approved, under 

section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), 

Alabama’s 2002 base-year emissions inventory for 

the Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area as part of the SIP 

revision submitted by ADEM to provide for 

attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in the Area. 

See 77 FR 6467. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: On April 23, 2013, the 

Alabama Department of Environmental 

Management (ADEM), submitted a 

request to redesignate the Alabama 

portion of the Chattanooga, TN-GA-AL 

fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 

nonattainment area (hereafter referred to 

as the ‘‘Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area’’ or 

‘‘Area’’) to attainment for the 1997 

Annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS) and to 

approve a State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) revision containing a maintenance 

plan for the Alabama portion of the 

Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area. The 

Alabama portion of the Chattanooga TNGA-AL Area is comprised of a portion 

of Jackson County in Alabama. EPA is 

approving the redesignation request and 

the related SIP revision, including the 

plan for maintaining attainment of the 

1997 Annual PM2.5 standard for the 

Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area. EPA is 

also approving the on-road motor 

vehicle insignificance determination for 

direct PM2.5 and nitrogen oxides (NOx) 

for the Alabama portion of the 

Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area. On 

September 14, 2012, and November 13, 

2014, Georgia and Tennessee 

(respectively) submitted requests to 

redesignate the Georgia and Tennessee 

portions of the Chattanooga TN-GA-AL 

Area. EPA will be taking separate action 

on the requests from Georgia and 

Tennessee. 

DATES: This rule is effective December 

22, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2014–0674. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the www.regulations.gov 

Web site. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joydeb Majumder, Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Joydeb 

Majumder may be reached by phone at 

(404) 562–9121 or via electronic mail at 

majumder.joydeb@epa.gov. 

I. What is the Background for the 

Actions? 

On April 23, 2013, ADEM submitted 

a request to redesignate the Alabama 

portion of the Chattanooga TN-GA-AL 

nonattainment area to attainment for the 

1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and to 

approve, as a revision to the Alabama 

SIP, a maintenance plan for the Area.1

On November 12, 2014, EPA proposed 

to redesignate the Alabama portion of 

Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area to 

attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5

NAAQS, and to approve, as a revision 

to the Alabama SIP, the State’s 1997 

Annual PM2.5 NAAQS maintenance 

plan and the on-road motor vehicle 

insignificance determination for direct 

PM2.5 and NOx for the Alabama portion 

of Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area 

included in that maintenance plan.2 See 

79 FR 67137. EPA also proposed to 

determine that the Chattanooga TN-GAAL Area is continuing to attain the 1997 

Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and that 

attainment can be maintained through 

2025. EPA received no adverse 

comments on the November 12, 2014, 

proposed rulemaking. EPA notes that it 

inadvertently referred to the Area as the 

‘‘Chattanooga, TN–GA Area’’ in the 

November 12, 2014, proposed 

rulemaking. In today’s final rulemaking, 

EPA is clarifying this Area should have 

been referred to as the ‘‘Chattanooga, 

TN-GA-AL Area’’ to account for a 

correction for the name of this Area that 

was published in the Federal Register 

on May 5, 2014, at 79 FR 25508. 

In its November 12, 2014, proposed 

action, EPA stated that the adequacy 

public comment period on the motor 

vehicle insignificance determination (as 

contained in Alabama’s April 23, 2013, 

submittal) began on September 22, 2014, 

and closed on October 22, 2014. No 

comments were received during this 

public comment period, and therefore, 

EPA deems the insignificance 

determination adequate for the purposes 

of transportation conformity. 

As stated in EPA’s November 12, 

2014, proposal notice, the 3-year design 

value of 12.9 micrograms per cubic 

meter (mg/m3) for the Area for 2007– 

2009 meets the PM2.5 Annual NAAQS of 

15.0 mg/m3. EPA has reviewed the most 

recent ambient monitoring data, which 

confirms that the Area continues to 

attain the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS 

beyond the 3-year attainment period of 

2007–2009. 

II. What are the Actions EPA is Taking? 

In today’s rulemaking, EPA is 

approving Alabama’s redesignation 

request to change the legal designation 

of the portion of the Jackson County in 

Alabama within the Area from 

nonattainment to attainment for the 

1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS, and as a 

revision to the Alabama SIP, the State’s 

1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS 

maintenance plan and the on-road 

motor vehicle insignificance 

determination for the Alabama portion 

of the Area included in that 

maintenance plan. The maintenance 

plan is designed to demonstrate that the 

Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area will 

continue to attain the 1997 Annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS through 2025. EPA’s 

approval of the redesignation request is 

based on EPA’s determination that the 

Alabama portion of Chattanooga TNGA-AL Area meets the criteria for 

redesignation set forth in the CAA, 

including EPA’s determination that the 

Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area has 

attained and continues to attain the 

1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and that 

attainment can be maintained through 

2025. EPA’s analyses of Alabama’s 

redesignation request and maintenance 

plan are described in detail in the 

November 12, 2014, proposed rule. See 

79 FR 67137. Through this final action, 

EPA is finding the on-road motor 

vehicle insignificance determination for 

the Alabama portion of the Area 

(included in that maintenance plan) 

adequate for transportation conformity 

purposes. 

EPA is now taking final action as 

described above. Additional background 

for today’s action is set forth in EPA’s 

November 12, 2014, proposal and is 

summarized below. 

EPA has reviewed the most recent 

ambient monitoring data, which 

indicate that the Chattanooga TN-GAAL Area continues to attain the 1997 

Annual PM2.5 NAAQS beyond the 

submitted 3-year attainment period of 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 76237 

2007–2009. As stated in EPA’s 

November 12, 2014, proposal notice, the 

3-year design value of 12.9 mg/m3 for the 

Area for 2007–2009 meets the NAAQS 

of 15.0 mg/m3. Quality assured and 

certified data in EPA’s Air Quality 

System (AQS) for 2013 provide a 3-year 

design value of 10.5 mg/m3 for the Area 

for 2011–2013. Furthermore, 

preliminary monitoring data for 2014 

indicate that the Area is continuing to 

attain the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. 

The 2014 preliminary data are available 

in AQS although the data are not yet 

quality assured and certified. 

III. Why is EPA taking these actions? 

EPA has determined that the 

Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area has 

attained the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS 

and has also determined that all other 

criteria for the redesignation of the 

Alabama portion of Chattanooga TNGA-AL Area from nonattainment to 

attainment of the 1997 Annual PM2.5

NAAQS have been met. See CAA 

section 107(d)(3)(E). One of those 

requirements is that the Alabama 

portion of Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area 

has an approved plan demonstrating 

maintenance of the 1997 Annual PM2.5

NAAQS over the ten-year period 

following redesignation. EPA has 

determined that attainment can be 

maintained through 2025 and is taking 

final action to approve the maintenance 

plan for the Chattanooga TN-GA-AL 

Area as meeting the requirements of 

sections 175A and 107(d)(3)(E) of the 

CAA. The detailed rationale for EPA’s 

findings and actions is set forth in the 

November 12, 2014, proposed 

rulemaking. See 79 FR 67137. 

IV. What are the effects of these 

actions? 

Approval of the redesignation request 

changes the legal designation of the 

portion of the Jackson County in 

Alabama within the Area from 

nonattainment to attainment for the 

1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is 

modifying the regulatory table in 40 

CFR 81.301 to reflect a designation of 

attainment for this portion of Jackson 

County. EPA is also approving, as a 

revision to the Alabama SIP, the State’s 

plan for maintaining the 1997 Annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS in the Chattanooga TNGA-AL Area. The maintenance plan 

includes the on-road motor vehicle 

insignificance determination for direct 

PM2.5 and NOx for the Alabama portion 

of the Chattanooga TN-GA-AL Area and 

contingency measures to remedy 

possible future violations of the 1997 

Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. 

V. Final Action 

EPA is taking final action to approve 

the redesignation and change the legal 

designation of a portion of Jackson 

County in Alabama from nonattainment 

to attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5

NAAQS. Through this action, EPA is 

also approving into the Alabama SIP the 

1997Annual PM2.5 maintenance plan for 

the Alabama portion of the Chattanooga 

TN-GA-AL Area, which includes an onroad motor vehicle insignificance 

finding for direct PM2.5 and NOx for the 

Alabama portion of the Chattanooga TNGA-AL Area. Finally, EPA is finding the 

insignificance determination contained 

in Alabama’s April 23, 2013, SIP 

revision adequate for the purposes of 

transportation conformity. 

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), 

EPA finds that there is good cause for 

this action to become effective 

immediately upon publication. This is 

because a delayed effective date is 

unnecessary due to the nature of a 

redesignation to attainment, which 

relieves the Area from certain CAA 

requirements that would otherwise 

apply to it. The immediate effective date 

for this action is authorized under both 

5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which provides that 

rulemaking actions may become 

effective less than 30 days after 

publication if the rule grants or 

recognizes an exemption or relieves a 

restriction, and section 553(d)(3), which 

allows an effective date less than 30 

days after publication as otherwise 

provided by the agency for good cause 

found and published with the rule. The 

purpose of the 30-day waiting period 

prescribed in section 553(d) is to give 

affected parties a reasonable time to 

adjust their behavior and prepare before 

the final rule takes effect. Today’s rule, 

however, does not create any new 

regulatory requirements such that 

affected parties would need time to 

prepare before the rule takes effect. 

Rather, today’s rule relieves the Area of 

various requirements for the Alabama 

portion of the Chattanooga TN-GA-AL 

Area. For these reasons, EPA finds good 

cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for this 

action to become effective on the date of 

publication of this action. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, redesignation of an 

area to attainment and the 

accompanying approval of the 

maintenance plan under CAA section 

107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the 

status of geographical area and do not 

impose any additional regulatory 

requirements on sources beyond those 

required by state law. A redesignation to 

attainment does not in and of itself 

impose any new requirements, but 

rather results in the application of 

requirements contained in the CAA for 

areas that have been redesignated to 

attainment. Moreover, the Administrator 

is required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For these 

reasons, these actions: 

• Are not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• do not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• are certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• do not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• do not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• are not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• are not significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• are not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and, 

• do not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

76238 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), nor will it impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by February 20, 2015. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. See section 

307(b)(2). 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, and Particulate matter. 

40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, National parks. 

Dated: December 9, 2014. 

Heather McTeer Toney, 

Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended 

as follows: 

PART 52–APPROVAL & 

PROMULGATION OF PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart B—Alabama 

■ 2. Section 52.50(e) is amended by 

adding an entry for ‘‘1997 Annual PM2.5

Maintenance Plan for the Alabama 

portion of Chattanooga TN-GA-AL 

Area’’ at the end of the table to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.50 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED ALABAMA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Name of non-regulatory SIP 

provision 

Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State submittal 

date/effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

1997 Annual PM2.5 Maintenance Plan for the Alabama 

portion of the Chattanooga 

TN-GA-AL Area.

Portion of Jackson County in 

the Chattanooga TN-GA-AL 

Area.

04/23/13 12/22/14 [Insert citation of 

publication].

PART 81—DESIGNATION FOR AIR 

QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 81 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 4. In § 81.301, the table entitled 

‘‘Alabama—1997 Annual PM2.5

NAAQS’’ is amended under 

‘‘Chattanooga, TN-GA:’’ by revising the 

entry for ‘‘Jackson County (part)’’ to read 

as follows: 

§ 81.301 Alabama. 

* * * * * 

ALABAMA—1997 ANNUAL PM2.5 NAAQS 

[Primary and secondary] 

Designated area 

Designation a Classification 

Date 1 Type Date 2 Type 

*******

Chattanooga, TN-GA-AL:.

Jackson County (part) ...................................................... 12/22/14 Attainment.

The area described by US Census 2000 block group 

identifier 01–071–9503–1 

*******

a Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. 

1This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted. 

2This date is July 2, 2014, unless otherwise noted. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–29776 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES