alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2520

To amend title IV, of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act

of 1977, to encourage the mining and reclamation of previously mined

areas by active mining operations, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 6 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. FORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend title IV, of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, to encourage the mining and reclamation of previously mined areas by active mining operations, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 ABANDONED MINE FEE CREDIT

4 SECTION 1. Section 402(a) of the Surface Mining

5 Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1322(a))

6 is amended as follows:

7 (1) Add the following after Sec. 402(a):
2

S 2520 IS

1 ‘‘(1) Except as provided in subsection

2 402(a)(2),’’.

3 (2) At the end of the paragraph add the follow4 ing paragraph:

5 ‘‘(2) The Secretary may grant a credit to any

6 operator for the reclamation fee otherwise required

7 to be paid in section 402(a)(1) for coal within an eli8 gible site, pursuant to section 404, as an incentive

9 to operators, to remine areas if the Secretary finds

10 that (1) the cost to reclaim the affected area under

11 this title would significantly exceed the reclamation

12 fee credit provided for the recoverable coal within

13 the affected site and (2) the mining and subsequent

14 reclamation of the affected site by a private operator

15 is in the public interest. In a primacy State, the Sec16 retary shall administer the provision of this para17 graph through a cooperative agreement with that

18 State and shall obtain the recommendation of the

19 State before granting the credit. The Secretary may

20 require a bond to ensure repayment of the credit in

21 the event the site is not fully reclaimed.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VERIDIEN CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  421,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,096
<INVENTORY>                                    146,121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               603,064
<PP&E>                                         472,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                 420,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 743,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,376,924
<BONDS>                                      1,853,629
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     60,169
<COMMON>                                        99,830
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,652,301)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   743,127
<SALES>                                        176,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               448,156
<CGS>                                          118,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,115,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             150,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (817,267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (817,267)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (817,267)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.009)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.005)
<FN>
With regard to commitments and contingencies referred to in our footnotes at
December 31, 1998, as of June 30, 1999, settlements were completed at nominal
cost involving litigation of potential rescission of common stock and the
assertion by the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) concerning an alleged
violation of labeling of one shipment of product considered to be hazardous
material.


</TABLE>
No. 10-5247.

#### William Hudgins, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1030, 131 S. Ct. 567,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8775.

178 L. Ed. 2d 416,

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 338 Fed. Appx. 150.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, July 27, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-16862 Filed 6-19-98; 4:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregorio Frias, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 857]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered November 25, 2015, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Andrias, Kern and Oing, JJ.
DLA Distribution San Joaquin’s Deep Dive Disposal Team receives Big Ideas Award
 
  By DLA Distribution Public Affairs
  The
DLA Distribution San Joaquin, Calif., Fiscal Year 2015 Deep DiveDisposalTeam has been named the****DLA
Distribution Big Ideas Award winners in the “Small” category for the fourth
quarter of FY15. The
team consists of Abelardo “Abe” Cabrera**,**activity equipment
program manager; Nyia Frisby, accountable property officer; and Bret Goodwin,
equipment maintenance manager. The Distribution San Joaquin FY15 Deep Dive Disposal
Team has yielded tremendous results in equipment management optimization. 
Demonstrating exceptional financial stewardship, the team’s resilience
and focus were critical to the successful execution of DLA Distribution’s FY15
Deep Dive goals to “right size” San Joaquin’s equipment fleet while still
maintaining its mission readiness in support of the Warfighter, said commander
Marine Corps Col. Keith Reventlow. When DLA Distribution San Joaquin completed its move
from its Sharpe site and consolidated all stock and equipment at its Tracy site,
it was faced with the issue of determining which excess equipment had passed its
life expectancy and could be disposed of so that equipment replacement costs
could be eliminated from DLA Distribution San Joaquin’s assets record. In April 2015, Cabrera began the process of reviewing
approximately 700 pieces of equipment managed in the Equipment Management and
Control System, line by line.  Based on that review, he identified
36 pieces of equipment that met the criteria of excessive age, high maintenance
costs, or under-utilization due to excess quantity resulting from the Sharpe
move.  Coordination then began with Goodwin and Frisby to develop
an action plan to begin pulling and staging the equipment for disposal. Cabrera coordinated with San Joaquin’s senior
leadership and warehouse management team for the removal of the equipment and
the redistribution of the remaining fleet assets as needed to ensure mission
equipment priorities were not interrupted or handicapped. Once notified by
Cabrera to initiate pick up of the designated equipment for disposal, Goodwin
coordinated with San Joaquin’s on-site contracted maintenance service, who
oversaw the process of prepping the equipment for disposal while at the
maintenance shop. At
the same time, Frisby was working closely with both Cabrera and Goodwin to
maintain meticulous disposal documentation for each piece of equipment being
disposed of in order to eliminate any delays during the disposal process. All of
this was accomplished by the team while they still managed their primary
duties.  “Their professionalism and attention to detail
demonstrated their commitment to financial stewardship, effective resource
management, and dedication to ensuring DLA Distribution is audit ready,” said
Reventlow. He
continued, saying, “The team’s actions have had a significant financial impact
on the agency.  The results of the team’s disposal actions also
contributed to the modernization of San Joaquin’s forklift fleet, aiding DLA’s
effort to modernize equipment across the agency.”
No. 10-5647.

#### Evella Grisby Jordan, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 933, 131 S. Ct. 332,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7463.

178 L. Ed. 2d 216,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 882.
No. 10-5460.

#### Carlos Martinez, aka Manuel Suarez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 923, 131 S. Ct. 303,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7168.

178 L. Ed. 2d 197,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
DLA Aviation celebrates all heritages at NAS Jacksonville Multicultural Fun Day
 
  By Joe Phoebus, management analyst, DLA Aviaitoin at Jacksonville
  Employees from Defense Logistics Aviation at Jacksonville, Florida, participated in the 8th annual Multicultural Fun Day July 14, at Naval Air Station Jacksonville. The event was sponsored by the Naval Air Station Multicultural Awareness Committee. DLA Aviation’s theme for the event was “The Hawaiian Culture: Preserving the past for the Future.” Several employees put together a display which included traditional Hawaiian musical instruments, food and the history of Hawaii. “Men and women of every cultural background take the lead and bring their skills to today's exciting Defense Logistical Agency Aviation and Navy culture that embraces diversity," said Navy Commander Dan Bessman, DLA Aviation Commander at Jacksonville. “It was important for us at DLA Aviation to celebrate our awareness of cultural understanding." DLA Aviation at Jacksonville employees who participate in the event were: Leslie and Demetrius Stanley, Staci Clark-Allen, Denise Cummings, Valerie Mueck and Tierra Williams. Williams, DLA Aviation sustainment specialist, is a Hawaiian native.  She gave demonstrations on the ūkulele (a guitar-type instrument) and the pàu (a drum). “Tierra (Williams) provided a depth of knowledge regarding her homeland and the Hawaiian culture that most do not have,” said DLA Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Specialist at Jacksonville Valerie Mueck. “Preserving one's culture is imperative, or it loses originality or accuracy over time.
#### Natalia Shafer, Respondent, v World of Chantilly, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[56 NYS3d 466]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated August 19, 2016, as denied that branch of their application which was to compel the plaintiff to provide an authorization for the release of medical records.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the defendants’ application which was to compel the plaintiff to provide an authorization for the release of medical records is treated as an application for leave to appeal from that portion of the order, and leave to appeal is granted *(see*CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the defendants’ application which was to compel the plaintiff to provide an authorization for the release of medical records relating to a certain medical condition. The defendants failed to meet their initial burden of demonstrating that the medical records sought are relevant to the issue in controversy and are material and necessary to the defense of this action *(see*CPLR 3101 [a]; 3121 [a]; *Sibley v Hayes 73 Corp.,*126 AD2d 629, 631 [1987]; *cf. Farkas v Orange Regional Med. Ctr.,*97 AD3d 720, 722 [2012]). Balkin, J.P., Roman, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
# C_2015302EN.01004601.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll v OHIM — Recticel (λ)

(Case T-215/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community figurative mark λ - Genuine use - Use as part of a composite mark - Proof of use - Articles 15 and 51(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 302/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG (Gladbeck, Germany) (represented by: J. Krenzel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially L. Rampini, and subsequently P. Bullock and N. Bambara, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Recticel SA (Brussels, Belgium)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 February 2013 (Case R 112/2012-5), relating to cancellation proceedings between Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG and Recticel SA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.

1

---
# DLA Energy Middle East Air Force major retires after 24-year career

/ Published Aug. 10, 2015
NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY BAHRAIN, Bahrain,
TF Steel Knight keeps essential supplies moving for Exercise Anakonda
 
  By  1st Lt. Jonathan Lazo and 1st Lt. Julie McCabe
                     View the article original article on
 *Army.mil* .
# Every day is Earth Day at DLA Distribution 

/ Published April 24, 2024
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa. , 
As we continue to celebrate Earth Day this week, its important to remember that Defense Logistics Agency Distribution’s commitment to environmental stewardship extends beyond just one day. Every day presents an opportunity to make a positive impact on our planet. 

By implementing sustainable practices throughout our supply chain and distribution network, we aim to minimize our ecological footprint and reduce the impact of our operations on the environment. Some of these initiatives include energy conservation, waste reduction, pollution prevention and the use of bio-based fuels. Through these actions we not only fulfill our duty to protect natural resources, but also contribute to the resilience of our military infrastructure and readiness.

Below you will find links to DLA programs focused on sustainability and more information about environmental issues facing our planet and their impacts.

Sustainability (dla.mil)

DLA Environmental Products And Services
#### Williams v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections

05/10/2016

136 MAL (2016)

Denied

No. 800 CD 2015
No. 10-338.

#### Domenic Tricome, Petitioner v. eBay, Inc.

562 U.S. 1005, 131 S. Ct. 529,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8475,

178 L. Ed. 2d 374,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# C_2015371EN.01002201.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2015 — First Islamic Investment Bank v Council

(Case T-161/13) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Error of assessment - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Proportionality))

(2015/C 371/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: First Islamic Investment Bank Ltd (Labuan, Malaysia) (represented by: B. Mettetal and C. Wucher-North, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: Á. de Elera-San Miguel Hurtado and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, for partial annulment of Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 356, p. 71) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 356, p. 55) and, second, for annulment of the Council’s decision to maintain the restrictive measures concerning the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls, in so far as they concern First Islamic Investment Bank Ltd:






  — | Point I of the Annex to Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

Annuls, in so far as they concern First Islamic Investment Bank Ltd:

—

Point I of the Annex to Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran;

| — | Point I of the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran; |
| --- | --- |

—

Point I of the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders First Islamic Investment Bank to bear one half of its own costs and to pay one half of the costs of the Council of the European Union, and the Council to bear one half of its own costs and to pay one half of the costs of First Islamic Investment Bank. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders First Islamic Investment Bank to bear one half of its own costs and to pay one half of the costs of the Council of the European Union, and the Council to bear one half of its own costs and to pay one half of the costs of First Islamic Investment Bank.

---

(1)  OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3762-3763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-020-05-1430-01: G-0078]


Realty Action; Oregon

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), DOI.

ACTION: Notice of Realty Action, Lease of Public Land in Harney County, 
Oregon.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following described public land is being considered for 
lease under Section 302 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976, (43 U.S.C. 1732), at not less than fair market value.

Willamette Meridian

T.20S., R.29E.,
    Sec. 34, S\1/2\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\SW\1/4\, SE\1/4\SE\1/4\SE\1/
4\SW\1/4\.

    The area described aggregates 3.75 acres, more or less, in 
Harney County, Oregon.

    The purpose of the lease would be to authorize a longstanding 
occupancy use. The term of the proposed lease would be for the lifetime 
of the proponents, Alan and Ethel Bossuot, who own improvements on the 
property. The improvements include a cabin, outbuildings, a bridge and 
corrals, which have existed on the property for at least 40 years. The 
improvements were originally placed on public land inadvertently by the 
Bossuots and their predecessors. For these reasons, the land would not 
be offered for lease on a competitive basis.
    The lease would be subject to Federal, State, and local ordinances 
applicable to

[[Page 3763]]

the premises in addition to other conditions deemed necessary to 
protect the public interest.
    The proposal conforms with the Three Rivers Resource Management 
Plan. Based on a review of this plan and other factors, the land has 
been determined suitable for lease under the above cited authority.

DATES: For a period of 45 days from the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register interested persons may submit comments 
regarding the proposed lease to the Three Rivers Resource Area Manager 
at the address described below. Comments will be considered in the NEPA 
analysis to be prepared for this proposal.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted to the Three Rivers Resource 
Area Manager, HC 74-12533, Hwy 20 West, Hines, Oregon 97738.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Detailed information concerning this 
proposal is available from Craig M. Hansen, Area Manager or Skip 
Renchler, Realty Specialist, Three Rivers Resource Area at the above 
address, phone (541) 573-4400.

    Dated: January 14, 1998.
Craig M. Hansen,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-1706 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M