alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 1: Carbon sequestered by LULUCF sinks as reported in the Inventory (Tg CO 2 Eq.) 1

, ranked in order of magnitude.

Forest Land Remaining Forest Land has been further broken up into forest and harvested wood carbon pools.

IPCC Source Category LULUCF Sink 2008 *1990–2008

Average

Forest Land Remaining Forest Land

(Carbon Stock Changes) Total Forest Sector C Stock Change (791.9) (688.0)

Forest (703.9) (576.7)

Aboveground Biomass (397.2) (373.5)

Soil Organic Carbon (145.9) (68.0)

Belowground Biomass (78.8) (74.1)

Litter (55.9) (35.8)

Dead Wood (26.2) (25.3)

Harvested Wood (88.0) (111.2)

SWDS (63.6) (63.7)

Products in Use (24.4) (47.6)

Settlements Remaining Settlements C Stock Changes in Urban Trees (93.9) (75.5)

Cropland Remaining Cropland Soil C Stock Changes for Mineral Soils (45.7) (51.5)

Land Converted to Grassland Soil C Stock Changes for Mineral Soils (25.1) (24.0)

Grassland Remaining Grassland Soil C Stock Changes in Mineral Soils (12.4) (23.3)

Other Changes in Yard Trimming and Food Scrap C

Stocks in Landfills (9.5) (13.6)

Gross Sequestration from LULUCF Sinks (978.5) (875.9)

* The U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventories submitted to the UNFCCC provide annual estimates from 1990.

Table 2: Emissions from LULUCF sources as reported in the Inventory (Tg CO2 Eq.), ranked in order of magnitude.

IPCC Source Category LULUCF Source 2008 *1990–2008

Average

Cropland Remaining Cropland Soil C Stock Changes in Organic Soils 27.7 27.6

Forest Land Remaining Forest Land Non

‐ CO 2 Emissions from Forest Fires 21.7 15.7

Land Converted to Cropland Soil C Stock Changes for Mineral and Organic

Soils 5.9 2.8

Cropland Remaining Cropland Liming of Agricultural Soils 3.8 4.4

Cropland Remaining Cropland Urea Fertilization 3.8 3.1

Grassland Remaining Grassland Soil C Stock Changes in Organic Soils 3.7 3.7

Settlements Remaining Settlements Direct N 2 O Fluxes from Settlement Soils 1.6 1.2

Wetlands Remaining Wetlands CO 2 and N 2 O Emissions from Peatlands

Remaining Peatlands 0.9 1.0

Land Converted to Grassland Soil C Stock Changes in Organic Soils 0.9 0.8

Forest Land Remaining Forest Land Direct N 2 O Emissions from Forest Soils 0.4 0.3

Gross Emissions from LULUCF Sources 70.4 60.6

* The U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventories submitted to the UNFCCC provide annual estimates from 1990.

1 The Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 –2008 (April 2010) and the archive of previous inventories

are available online from the Environmental Protection Agency Inventory Report Web site, located at

http://www.epa.gov/climatechang e/emissions/usinventoryreport.html

.
Reminder: Change smoke alarm batteries when clock springs forward
 
  By Jamie MacFarlane, Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond Fire Inspector
  The upcoming March 10 Daylight Saving time change marks the perfect biannual reminder to change all smoke alarm batteries, according to the DLA Fire Prevention Office team. In the United States, the National Fire Protection Association requires all residential structures to have smoke alarms installed inside and outside every sleeping area and at every level of one’s home. This is mainly due to modern building materials and household furnishings being more flammable. Fire and smoke will spread more quickly now than before when natural building materials were used, making it vital to have adequate smoke alarms to provide full coverage in one’s home. Working smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors give an early warning so all can get outside quickly. It’s essential to fix any malfunctioning smoke alarm before an emergency arises. If it chirps, replace the battery. It should be replaced immediately if it goes off randomly or for no reason at all. If it’s a potential nuisance alarm, treat it as an actual alarm and evacuate immediately. If your smoke alarm or carbon monoxide detector is malfunctioning, replace it immediately. The National Fire Protection Association reports that 71% of smoke alarms failures are due to missing, dead or disconnected batteries. Smoke alarms are some of the most neglected, least maintained equipment in most homes, making biannual daylight savings time the perfect opportunity to remember to change batteries in that equipment. Additional smoke alarm tips include: If a smoke alarm is chirping, change the battery. The chirp alerts users that the device battery is low.
 Proactively change the batteries in smoke alarms every six months.
 Test smoke detectors monthly or per the manufacturer’s recommendations.
 Ensure a smoke detector is installed in every bedroom and on every home floor.
 Smoke detectors have a 10-year life expectancy, so replace them at least once a decade. The manufacture date should be listed inside the detector.
 Some smoke detectors have non-replaceable 10-year batteries; these remain effective for up to 10 years.
 Do not paint or cover smoke detectors. For any questions, contact the DLA Richmond Fire Prevention office at 804-279-6782.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

____ 2011

______ - NM -

____ 150

______ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significan t? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2525

To require a majority vote of the Securities and Exchange Commission for

the adoption of accounting standards and principles used in the preparation of financial statements required under the Securities Exchange Act

of 1934.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 6 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Mr. MACK, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. SMITH, Mrs.

FEINSTEIN, Mr. ROBB, Mr. GREGG, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To require a majority vote of the Securities and Exchange

Commission for the adoption of accounting standards

and principles used in the preparation of financial statements required under the Securities Exchange Act of

1934.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accounting Standards

5 Reform Act of 1994’’.
2

•S 2525 IS

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

2 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

3 (1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,

4 the Congress granted the Securities and Exchange

5 Commission (hereafter in this Act referred to as the

6 ‘‘Commission’’) broad authority to set financial ac7 counting and reporting standards for publicly held

8 companies;

9 (2) historically, the Commission has delegated

10 such responsibility to the private sector, to the ex11 tent that the private sector demonstrates an ability

12 to fulfill such responsibility in the public interest;

13 and

14 (3) although the Commission has reserved the

15 right to disapprove standards proposed by the pri16 vate sector, a more affirmative process is needed to

17 ensure that the public interest is protected.

18 (b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of this Act are—

19 (1) to clarify the Securities Exchange Act of

20 1934 with regard to the Commission’s responsibility

21 in setting financial accounting and reporting stand22 ards for publicly held companies; and

23 (2) to ensure that the public interest is served

24 in the financial accounting standards setting proc25 ess.
3

•S 2525 IS

1 SEC. 3. ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND PRIN2 CIPLES FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIES

3 EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

4 Section 13(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of

5 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the

6 end the following: ‘‘On and after the date of enactment

7 of the Accounting Standards Reform Act of 1994, any new

8 accounting standard or principle, and any modification to

9 an existing accounting standard or principle, to be used

10 in the preparation of financial statements required to be

11 filed pursuant to this title shall become effective only fol12 lowing an affirmative vote of a majority of a quorum of

13 the members of the Commission.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2414 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2414

    To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue temporary 
    certificates of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
  employment in the coastwise trade for the vessels IDUN VIKING, LIV 
                       VIKING, and FREJA VIKING.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 23 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

   Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue temporary 
    certificates of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
  employment in the coastwise trade for the vessels IDUN VIKING, LIV 
                       VIKING, and FREJA VIKING.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COASTWISE TRADE AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine 
Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883) or any other provision of law 
restricting the operation of foreign-flag vessels in the coastwise 
trade of the United States, as applicable on the date of enactment of 
this Act, the foreign-flag vessels IDUN VIKING, LIV VIKING, and FREJA 
VIKING may, during the period described in subsection (b), engage in 
the transportation by water of passengers in the coastwise trade of the 
United States, if--
            (1) a binding contract for the construction or rebuilding, 
        in the United States, of coastwise-qualified replacement 
        vessels is executed within 9 months after the date of enactment 
        of this Act;
            (2) all ship repair work on the vessels necessary to their 
        operation under this section is performed in the United States; 
        and
            (3) all officers and crew members employed on board the 
        vessels during their operation under this section are United 
        States citizens.
    (b) Period of Authorization.--The period of transportation 
authorized under subsection (a) for each vessel begins on the date of 
enactment of this Act and ends on the earlier of--
            (1) the date that is 4 years after such date of enactment; 
        or
            (2) the date of delivery of a coastwise-qualified 
        replacement vessel constructed in or rebuilt in the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-6754.

#### Charles W. Hubbard, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 1019, 131 S. Ct. 546,

178 L. Ed. 2d 400,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8338.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 931.
# DLA director visits personnel, tours Europe and Africa regional command 

/ Published Aug. 24, 2015
Kaiserslautern, Germany,
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16405]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6108-9]


Settlement Under Section 122(h) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA); In the 
Matter of Spiegelberg Superfund Site, Green Oak Township, MI

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Settlement of CERCLA section 107 Cost Recovery Matter.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to settle a cost recovery claim with a 
potentially responsible party (PRP) with regard to past costs at the 
Spiegelberg site (the Site) in Green Oak Township, Michigan. EPA is 
authorized under section 122(h) of the CERCLA to enter into this 
administrative settlement.
    Response costs totaling $200,873.35 were incurred by EPA, between 
December 30, 1993 and September 30, 1997, in connection with the 
remedial action at the Site. On September 25, 1997 and October 22, 
1997, EPA sent the PRP demands for reimbursement of the EPA's past 
costs. The Settling Party has agreed to pay $194,000 to settle EPA's 
claim for reimbursement of response costs related to the Site. The U.S. 
Department of Justice has approved this settlement, consistent with 
section 122(h)(1) of CERCLA.
    The EPA is proposing to approve this administrative settlement 
because it reimburses EPA, in part, for costs incurred during its 
response activities at this Site.

DATES: Comments on this administrative settlement must be received by 
no later than July 20, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments relating to this settlement, Docket Number 
V-W-98-C-461, should be sent to Cynthia N. Kawakami, Associate Regional 
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Mail Code: C-
14J, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the Agreement and the 
Administrative Record for this Site are available at U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 5, Superfund Division, Emergency Response 
Branch, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590. It is 
strongly recommended that you telephone Ms. Denise Williams at (312) 
886-9481 before visiting the Region 5 Office.

    Authority: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9601 
et seq.

    Dated: May 22, 1998.
William E. Muno,
Director, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. 98-16405 Filed 6-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# DLA Energy Americas commander bids farewell

/ Published July 14, 2015
Houston,
# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of The State ofConnecticut and The Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority ) ) ) ) ) Trading Agreement and Order 81168 ModificationNo.2

Whereas, the Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and The Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority('Respondent) having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order 81168 and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows: I. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to comply with the emissions limits ofSubsections 22a-174-22(d)(1) through 22a-174- 22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ('Regulations) are hereby replaced with May 1,2010. 2. Any references to October 151 with respect to the date by which the Respondents shall estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits (DERCS) and/or allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009. 3. Any references to May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and retirement ofnon-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31, 2010. 4. All references to September 1, 2008 with respect to the submission ofFuture Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009. 5. No laterthan May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading Agreement and Order 81168 and/or its subsequentmodifications, the Respondent shall comply with the requirements ofSections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-174-22(d)(2)(A) of the Regulations. 6. All otherterms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and Order 81168, as modified, shall remain in effect.

( Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Street • Hartford. CT 06106 - 5127 http://www.cLgov/dcp All Equal Opportunity EmployerThe Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority 2 Trading Agreement and Order 8116B ModificationNo.2 The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice. The Connecticut

### Reso~;/s**~/-** Authority Signature:

# ~YI 

# -**~c** Name: 

# /firChU/ /;-'(

# cf()
c Titie: 

### _--=/)=--'-I

## r_e_L_-It--=ov'------'ot"'-----_Of-+-_~__="r'_--{;_/o_'-'_..I>__ Date:

__

### -tr/'--7-/-,h--"O"-'Q'---

_ Issued as a modification ofa Trading Agreement and Order.

### Ga~ IRostJ Diredor Engineering and Enforcement Division Bureau ofAir Management 

### 04

- 2f'- 2<ro'l Date**~:** .. ;.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                                   ASSIGNMENT

          This ASSIGNMENT is made as of the 29th day of December, 2005 by and
between Aveta Health, Inc., a Tennessee corporation located at 411 Hackensack
Avenue, 7th Floor, Hackensack, NJ 07601 ("Assignor") on the one hand, and Aveta
Inc., a Delaware corporation located at 173 North Marginal Road, Fort Lee, New
Jersey 07024 ("Assignee") on the other hand.

          WHEREAS, Assignor owns the following trademarks and corresponding
registrations (collectively the "Trademarks"): NORTH AMERICAN MEDICAL
MANAGEMENT, U.S. Reg. No. 1,835,051, and AVETA, U.S. Reg. No. 2,673,230;

          WHEREAS, Assignee is purchasing the Trademarks from Assignor;

          NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged:

          Assignor hereby sells, transfers, conveys, and assigns to Assignee all
right, title, and interest in and to the Trademarks, together with the goodwill
symbolized thereby, including all rights to sue and recover for past
infringement.

          Assignor agrees to execute all documents and assist in all proceedings
(at the sole cost and expense of the Assignee) to perfect, register, or record
the rights of the Assignee to the Trademarks as Assignee may reasonably deem
appropriate. If Assignor does not, within fifteen (15) days of presentment,
return the requested executed documents, then Assignee is hereby granted a
limited power of attorney to execute all such documents on behalf of Assignor.
This power of attorney is coupled with an interest and is irrevocable.

AVETA HEALTH, INC.                      AVETA INC.


By: /s/ JOSEPH MARK                     By: /s/ HOWARD KAMINS
    ---------------------------------       ------------------------------------
   Joseph Mark                             Howard Kamins
   President and COO                       Vice President

December 29, 2005                       December 29, 2005
From: Sadler Randy [ mailto:randy.sadler@argillon.com ] Sent: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2008 08:15

To: Hans Hartenstein Cc: Khalaf Cindy R Subject: Argillon Tail-end SCR Importance: High

On behalf of Cindy Khalaf -

Hans,

Further to our phone call, as far as I know, Argillon has more tail end experience than any other SCR catalyst manufacturer and, as you noted, we also have experience with high dust, German lignite SCRs. Argillon also won the first US lignite SCR catalyst project (Luminant Oak Grove 1 & 2) and provided commercial guarantees. These units are not in service yet. So, yes, we consider ourselves able to answer these questions competently.

Consider a tail-end SCR technically feasible?

Yes, we consider this configuration to be technically feas ible. As you know, tail end SCRs are often used when there are significant catalyst poisons in a flue gas stream. A wet scrubber can remove most of these poisons, resulting in very low catalyst deactivation.

Recommend or require additional pilot testing?

For a high dust configuration, we would say definitely. For a tail-end configuration, we would say no. We would only like to see a flue gas analysis for conditions at the inlet to the SCR in order to predict deactivation rate.

Be willing to provide commercial guarantees for catalys t performance (activity, pressure drop and SO2/SO3 conversion rate) and lifetime? If so what would these be?

Generally speaking, yes, we would provide guarantees for deNOx & slip as specified (not to exceed 90% or 2 ppm), 24k hours life, SO 2 conversion rate - low but value TBD, pressure drop - value TBD. Of course we would have to see the technical specifications before being more specifi c. In addition, tail-end SCRs perform much longer, so depending on the application specifics, cu stomer, etc., we may decide to extend the operating life guarantees. This is a commercial decision and will be reviewed on a case-by case basis.

If you have any more questions, please let me know.

Regards, Cindy

Cindy R. Khalaf

Argillon LLC

President

Tel: 678.341.7520

Mobile: 770.331.9571

FAX: 678.341.7509

Email: cindy.khalaf@argillon.com 5895 Shiloh Road, Ste. 101 Alpharetta, GA 30005
7018 0040 0001 1393 2461
# Susquehanna’s Middleton selected as Employee of the Week

/ Published May 20, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Kelly Middleton, supply technician at DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pa., has been named Employee of the Week for the week of May 16 to 20.

As part of the Distribution Susquehanna Research Resolution Office, Middleton uses various database systems to perform in-depth research to analyze and prevent discrepancies and lost materials between the New Cumberland and Mechanicsburg sites.

A member of the DLA Distribution family since 2003, Middleton performs extensive, in-depth investigations of specific contractual, non-payment discrepancies and ensures all serial numbers match the sticker on the manifest.  

“Kelly is an outstanding employee,” said DLA Distribution Susquehanna commander, Army Col. Corey New. “Her skills, determination, and professionalism are invaluable resources for Susquehanna and the DLA enterprise.”
No. 10-5407.

#### Charles D. Adams, Petitioner v. Department of Defense.

562 U.S. 920, 131 S. Ct. 292,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7650.

178 L. Ed. 2d 191,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 93.
No. 10-5620.

#### James Michael Myron, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 932, 131 S. Ct. 328,

178 L. Ed. 2d 213,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7149.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.