alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ACE-13]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Aurora, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Aurora, NE.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 14606 is effective on 
0901 UTC, August 13, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on March 26, 1998 
(63 FR 14606). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on August 13, 1998. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this document confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on May 21, 1998.
Christopher R. Blum,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 98-15309 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Michelle R. v Alexander R.

1st Dept: 143 AD3d 583

denied*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Grove Holdings LLC
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          19,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,033 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                    218,901 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               367,271 
<PP&E>                                         217,581 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 879,675 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          204,762 
<BONDS>                                              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                             0 
<OTHER-SE>                                     (61,950)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   879,675 
<SALES>                                        350,369 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               350,369 
<CGS>                                          284,895 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  284,895 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,974 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,775 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,936)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,821 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,757)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0 
                                         


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33418-33419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Enterprise Computer Telephony Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 25, 1997, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Enterprise Computer 
Telephony Forum (``ECTF'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.

[[Page 33419]]

Specifically, Deutsche Telekom, Berlin, GERMANY; and Excel, Inc., 
Hyannis, MA, have become Principal Members. Ariel Corp., Cranbury, NJ; 
Comdial Corporation, Charlottesville, VA; DeTeWe Kommunikations, 
Berlin, GERMANY; Dictaphone, Stratford, CT; Eastman Kodak, Rochester, 
NY; Force Computers, San Jose, CA; Mitsubishi Electronics Corp., 
Kanagawa, JAPAN; Offnet SPA, Rome, ITALY; Phillips Business 
Communications, Hilversum, THE NETHERLANDS; Summa Four, Inc., 
Manchester, NH; and Vanguard, Morris Plains, NJ, have become Auditing 
Members.
    Precision Systems, Inc. and Voice Technologies Group are no longer 
Principal Members.
    Ascom Telecom Ltd, Berkeley Speech Technologies; and Digital 
Systems International, are no longer Auditing Members.
    No other changes have been made in the membership, nature or 
objectives of ECTF. Membership remains open, and ECTF intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On February 20, 1996, ECTF filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
May 13, 1996 (61 FR 22074).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 2, 1997. 
A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act on November 28, 1997 (62 FR 63387).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 98-16219 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 38.5 39.0 39.5 40.0 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/04 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ●


## ★ ● ● ● ●
No. 10-5608.

#### Roger Odum, Petitioner v. New York.

562 U.S. 931, 131 S. Ct. 326,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7407.

178 L. Ed. 2d 212,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 67 App. Div. 3d 1465, 890 N.Y.S.2d 241.
Other

762.1715
# C_2013274EN.01000201.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht München (Germany) lodged on 28 May 2013 — RWE AG v Freistaat Bayern

(Case C-296/13)

2013/C 274/02

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: RWE AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Freistaat Bayern

Defendant:

By decision of the Court of 25 July 2013 the case was removed from the register.

---
2016-0615.

#### State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State University.

In Mandamus.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Baron Howell, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 233]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Mogulescu, J., at motion; Troy Webber, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered April 6, 2000, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (four counts), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of six years to life, unanimously affirmed.

There was no violation of defendant’s right to be present during jury selection. The record establishes that defendant waived his right to be present at all sidebar conferences (see *People v Velasquez,*1 NY3d 44 [2003]), including the sidebar that immediately preceded the waiver, at which the court excused a prospective juror who had just stated in open court that he knew defendant. Moreover, the record also warrants the conclusion that, as a result of a disqualifying relationship with defendant (s*ee*CPL 270.20 [1] [c]; *People v Branch,*46 NY2d 645 [1979]), the panelist was excused for cause by the court, so that defendant’s absence would not require reversal in any event *(People v Vargas,*88 NY2d 363, 378 [1996]).

*259The motion court properly denied, without a hearing, defendant’s motion to suppress fruits of his allegedly unlawful arrest. In this undercover sale case, although defendant possessed sufficient factual information to prepare an adequate suppression motion, his claim of innocuous behavior at the time of his arrest, and his vague and generalized assertion that he “was never previously observed engaging in any illegal or suspicious activity,” were insufficient to either deny participation in the underlying drug transaction or to allege some other basis for suppression *(see People v Jones,*95 NY2d 721 [2001]; *compare People v Hightower,*85 NY2d 988 [1995]). We note that after the People submitted an answering affirmation that set forth, in detail, the predicate for defendant’s arrest, defendant did not reply, and the court expressly decided that there was no factual issue warranting a *Mapp/Dunaway*hearing.

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.
# C_2013336EN.01000602.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/6

---

Action brought on 31 July 2013 — European Commission v Slovak Republic

(Case C-433/13)

2013/C 336/15

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Tokár and F. Schatz, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Slovak Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by refusing to provide the cash benefit for care, cash benefit for assistance and cash benefit to compensate for increased costs under Law No 447/2008 to persons entitled who have their residence in a Member State other than the Slovak Republic, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 48 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Articles 7 and 21 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by refusing to provide the cash benefit for care, cash benefit for assistance and cash benefit to compensate for increased costs under Law No 447/2008 to persons entitled who have their residence in a Member State other than the Slovak Republic, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 48 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Articles 7 and 21 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems; (1)

1

| — | order the Slovak Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Slovak Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission submits that the cash benefit for care, cash benefit for assistance and cash benefit to compensate for increased costs under Law No 447/2008 are sickness benefits within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation No 883/2004 which must also be paid to persons entitled who reside outside the Member State concerned (in the present case the Slovak Republic). National legislation thus may not restrict the right of persons entitled who have their residence outside the Slovak Republic to the receipt of those benefits. The national legislation of the Slovak Republic which lays down such a restriction is therefore contrary to Article 48 TFEU and Articles 7 and 21 of Regulation No 883/2004.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1.

1

---
# Fort Carson employee honored

/ Published Dec. 3, 2020
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Material Examiner and Identifier Michael Vasquez was recently named Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Employee of the Quarter for his stellar contributions to the property disposal mission at Fort Carson, Colorado.

Vasquez was cited for his positive attitude, outstanding customer service and willingness to cover additional shifts in the face of operational challenges brought on by the coronavirus pandemic.

For his part, Vasquez, who has been with DLA for about a year but said he has worked in warehousing all his life, just appreciates a role where he can clock in, work hard, and then clock out and go home.

“It’s what I like to do,” Vasquez said. “I look at it as being a property detective. When stock numbers don’t match up, you’ve got to go in and figure it out. It keeps things interesting.”

During the reporting period, Vasquez performed over 1,200 receipts and achieved a greater than 35% “on-the-shelf rate,” meaning that more than a third of the turn-in items he processed were later made available for reuse. 

Vasquez’ award nomination said “his ability to work both accurately and independently were paramount to DLA Disposition Services Colorado Springs being able to accommodate 100% of all mission essential requirements during the heart of the pandemic. His willingness to be present daily ensured the mission could be met without recall of higher risk personnel. ... Mike is tenacious and vigorously works the entirety of his shifts while exceeding the standards that local management and the agency has set for him.”

Vasquez praised his colleagues for their attitude and the camaraderie that he felt was rare in a workplace.

“It’s like a brotherhood,” he said. “We make each other laugh, we try to keep everything upbeat, we’ve all got each other’s back, and no one feels that a particular job is beneath them. I’ve worked places where that wasn’t the case, and it didn’t make for a cohesive unit.”

His supervisors and colleagues kept the award nomination a secret. Vasquez said that when site leadership recently called everyone together to congratulate him, he jokingly asked if they finally had decided to give him a pink slip and send him packing. Instead, they gave him something else entirely.

“It was a big surprise for me,” he said. “It’s like a little self-confidence boost. It’s a kind of reassurance, like maybe you’re doing something right.”
# Cherry Point employees enjoy a “summer slam” of a time during team building event

/ Published Aug. 31, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
Employees at Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Cherry Point recently got the chance to let their hair down and enjoy time away from their workspaces during the Summer Slam employee appreciation event that took place Aug. 25 at Hancock Lodge on Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina.

Members of the employee morale and engagement group spearheaded the event. Employees who attended were treated to delicious local barbecue and games such as cornhole and trivia and had the chance to dunk senior leadership in the dunk tank.

DLA Aviation at Cherry Point Officer-in-Charge Navy Cmdr. David Odom said the event was a great time and a very well-deserved break for those who work hard every day supporting the warfighter.
No. 10-49.

#### Michelle London-Marable, et vir, Petitioners v. The Boeing Company, et al.

562 U.S. 891, 131 S. Ct. 260,

178 L. Ed. 2d 139,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6345.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 61.
# DLA engineer shatters glass ceiling 

/ Published March 25, 2024
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Lori Smith-Mitchell’s strong faith and passion for her craft propelled her to become the first female engineer at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution. Smith-Mitchell’s engineering interests were sparked while attending a science, technology, engineering and math high school. She went on to earn a bachelor’s degree in manufacturing engineering from the University of Memphis and a master’s of adult education, training and development from The Pennsylvania State University.

Smith-Mitchell is among the 14% of female engineers worldwide. She began as an industrial and process engineer for several Fortune 500 companies and as a college professor before joining DLA in 2009.

“My 14 years as an industrial engineer at Installation Management Support for DLA Distribution helped to refine my skill set to successfully serve in my current role as DLA Research and Development’s additive manufacturing program manager,” Smith-Mitchell said. “Victor Montefour, director of installation management support for DLA Distribution, was brave enough to take a chance on me. It was scary and challenging to be the only woman on the team, but I am thankful for the opportunity to advance within DLA.”

The admiration is mutual.

“Lori’s interview left me with the sense that she’d pursue tasks to the best of her ability. And she far exceeded that initial impression,” Montefour said. “The added bonus is her infectious positivity!”

In 2021, Smith-Mitchell initially came to DLA R&D on a rotational assignment under the mentorship of another exceptional engineer, Senthil Arul. Two years later, she returned as a permanent R&D team member.  

“I was ready to do more, in a different capacity,” Smith-Mitchell recalled. “Additive manufacturing allowed me to return to my process engineering roots.”

Smith-Mitchell works to define AM’s role within the Defense Department’s ever-evolving ecosystem and enable the business processes that integrate AM into the global supply chain. She is a stalwart advocate for the emerging technology that allows for rapidly manufactured parts at the tactical edge. The Joint Additive Manufacturing Acceptability multi-series project is a highlight for her program. JAMA is in its fourth iteration of establishing a military services common framework for 3D Model Technical Data Packages that qualifies AM parts. This ultimately reduces backlogs and obsolescence to improve readiness.

As a groundbreaking female engineer, Smith-Mitchell is inspired by the World War II heroine, Rosie the Riveter.

“She is a symbol of women in manufacturing and empowerment,” Smith-Mitchell said.

Smith-Mitchell is a strong advocate for the next generation of women earning engineering degrees. She believes that STEM is the future as it impacts every facet of life.

Learn more about DLA’s R&D mission to develop and deliver new capabilities through applied technologies and innovative solutions to enhance warfighter sustainment.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carol Bond, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 606]

An appeal having been *544taken to this Court by the above-named, appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered October 1, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Maz-zarelli, Kapnick, Webber and Moulton, JJ.
# Army officer family runs 38th Army Ten-Miler  

/ Published Oct. 21, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Army Lt. Col. Sonia I. Huertas, commander of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Red River, Texas, ran the 38th Army Ten-Miler race Oct. 9 in Washington, D.C. She ran alongside her son, Army Capt. Jose J. Huertas, civil affairs officer with the 95th Civil Affairs Brigade, Airborne, at Fort Bragg, North Carolina and her daughter, Army Capt. Ivette M. Huertas, with the 742nd Military Intelligence Battalion at Fort George G. Meade, Maryland.

“It was a fantastic experience,” Lt. Col. Huertas said. “I realized that I wanted to show other female logisticians that you can have it all if you create a goal and work to make it happen.”

Running the Army Ten-Miler was a chance for Lt. Col. Huertas to keep a promise to herself, by achieving a goal she set to help inspire other young women in the military. One of the women Huertas inspired was fellow Army logistician, Army Capt. Nikole Hairston.

“Nikole is a hardworking single mother who trained with me virtually and ran with me in person. She is currently attending the Captain's Career Course at Fort Lee, Virginia, with a follow on assignment to Fort Bragg, North Carolina,” Lt. Col. Huertas said.                   Army Lt. Col. Sonia I. Huertas ran a10.5-minute mile average, finishing the 38th Army 10-miler race in 1 hour, 53 minutes, Oct. 9, 2022.                            Army officer family runs 38th Army Ten-Miler                            Army Lt. Col. Sonia I. Huertas ran a10.5-minute mile average, finishing the 38th Army 10-miler race in 1 hour, 53 minutes, Oct. 9, 2022.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Distribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 221009-D-D0441-0002

“I also ran into a few old teammates from my commissioning,” she said. “There were also wounded warriors, including amputees, a 91-year-old woman and a group of West Point graduates in their 60’s and 70’s wearing t-shirts that read, ‘Never Quit.’” 

To prepare for the race, Lt. Col. Huertas trained for four months at the Red River Army Depot Fitness Center.with CrossFit trainer Siera Nelson, who also prepared her for the Army combat fitness test.

“I wanted to run a 12-minute mile, but I beat that goal, running a 10.5-minute mile average, finishing the race in 1 hour, 53 minutes,” Lt. Col. Huertas said.

The race wasn’t the first Army 10-miler Lt. Col. Huertas ran, but it was the first time she ran the race while in command and with her children, which made it even more special. Capt. Ivette Huertas also ran the race before, but it was the first time Capt. Jose Huertas ran ten miles. The family of Army officers finished the race together.