alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Aviation shares sustainment practices at International Military Helicopter Symposium

/ Published Feb. 28, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
Addressing the maintenance challenges of keeping 4,000 military helicopters flying, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler spoke at the International Military Helicopter Conference in London, United Kingdom Feb. 20.

The international symposium brings together more than 200 NATO military and industry leaders, offering a strategic forum to discuss the role of the military helicopter and how to sustain this critical capability. This year’s conference theme was “Delivering the next generation of rotocraft in 2040+.”

Vertical lift remains an evolving domain. As nations prepare for near-peer competition and new technologies emerge, new capabilities are demanded from vertical lift platforms.

“At DLA Aviation, we seek a collaborative approach between aerospace and defense industry leaders, small businesses, the U.S. Department of Defense, our military services to creatively battle obsolescence of repair parts for aged platforms, and prepare to support the future force,” Tyler said.

Tyler’s remarks called for sustaining the current/next generation rotorcraft. He discussed DLA’s focus on providing thousands of consumable items and reparable spares for the AH-64 Apache, CH-47 Chinook, H-60 Black Hawk, UH-1 Huey, and V-22 Osprey weapons systems.

Tyler said while efforts continue on future rotorcraft support, consideration must be given to ensuring program offices and industry partners have logisticians with recent practical sustainment experience embedded in the planning and development of our new weapon systems.

“We must work together to enhance the industrial base over the next few years if we hope to have a foundation capable of continued sustainment and simultaneous development and fielding of next generation rotorcraft.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          98,495                  98,495
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,449                   3,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                       390                     390
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,180                 104,180
<PP&E>                                          21,351                  21,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,062                   4,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,872                 140,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,331                   7,331
<BONDS>                                          7,872                   7,872
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       185,925                 185,925
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,770)                 (4,770)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,872                 140,872
<SALES>                                          3,418                   7,619
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,418                   7,619
<CGS>                                            3,396                   8,613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,838                  31,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 298                     574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,455)                (28,856)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,455)                (28,856)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,455)                (28,856)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)                  (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)                  (1.05)


</TABLE>
EX-10.01



 





AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment No. 2”) is entered into this
23rd day of November, 2004, effective as of December 1, 2004 (“Effective Date”), by and
between TIMCO AVIATION SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and ROY T. RIMMER, JR.
(“Employee”)



Preliminary Statements




     A. The parties have previously entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated March 20,
2002, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated July 17, 2003
(collectively, the “Agreement”). Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms used herein shall
have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.



     B. The parties wish to amend the Agreement to reflect the terms set forth below.



Agreement




     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants set forth herein, and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:



     1. Section 1(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting all of its text and replacing
it with the following text:




	 	 	     (b) Employment Period. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth
herein and unless sooner terminated as hereinafter provided, Company shall employ
Employee and Employee agrees to serve as an employee of Company for the period
commencing on March 20, 2002 and ending on December 31, 2007, which initial term
shall automatically renew for consecutive one year periods, unless terminated by
either party by twelve (12) months notice prior to the expiration of the initial
term or any renewal term (the “Employment Term”). For purposes of this Agreement,
the Employment Term and any renewal term thereof are collectively referred to herein
as the “Employment Period.”




     2. Section 2(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting all of its text and replacing
it with the following text:




	 	 	     (a) Base Salary. In consideration for the Employee’s services
hereunder and the restrictive covenants contained herein, effective as of the
Effective Date, the Employee’s base salary shall be $475,000 per annum (the
“Salary”), payable in accordance with TIMCO’s customary payroll practices.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Employee’s annual Salary may be increased at any time
and from time to time to levels greater than the level set forth in the preceding
sentence at the sole



 









 





	 	 	discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of TIMCO
(“Committee”) to reflect merit or other increases.




     3. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 2, effective as of the
Effective Date set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	TIMCO AVIATION SERVICES, INC., a
	

	 	Delaware corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Gil West
	

	 	 	 	
 
	

	 	 	 	Gil West

	

	 	 	 	President and Chief Operating Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	EMPLOYEE:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	/s/ Roy T. Rimmer, Jr.
	

	 	
 
	

	 	Roy T. Rimmer, Jr.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:28 AM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: 

Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary 

Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 

Hi Bob, 

Attached is the handout from this meeting. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_25_GHGExisitng_RePower_Handout.pdf >> 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: Emission 

Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility 

Generating Units 

When: Friday, April 25, 2014 4:00 PM-4:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). 

Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building 

This meeting was requested by Eli Hopson, Latham & Watkins on behalf of RePower South.
# DLA announces August employee of the month winners 

/ Published Nov. 22, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
Tamika Williams, a sustainment specialist with Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Jacksonville, Florida, and Donald Meyer, a customer support specialist lead at DLA Aviation at Cherry Point, North Carolina, were named DLA Aviation Employees of the Month for August.

Employee of the month is awarded to non-supervisory civilian employees. Two recipients are selected based on general schedule pay levels – one from GS 1-9 (Category 1) and one from GS 10-13 (Category 2). Recipients receive a coin, certificate of achievement from the DLA Aviation deputy commander and a cash award. 

“I am extremely appreciative to receive this award.” Williams said. “Being recognized for my contributions feels amazing.” 

“Williams’ meticulous management of 1,320 items throughout the rating period directly contributed to the command’s 95% material availability success rate, and a 3% increase of stock on-hand through gross demand planning,” said Damon Heemstra, a chief in the Industrial Planning and Support Division of the DLA Aviation Customer Operations Directorate, DLA Aviation at Jacksonville.

“Ms. Williams accomplishes the mission through collaboration with planning, order fulfillment and Fleet Readiness Center Southeast in Jacksonville, Florida, Joint Logistics Team members ensuring material requirements are aligned and available to meet production schedules,” Heemstra said. “Her numerous hours researching forecasts, replacement factors and quantity per assembly has not only ensured material availability but has had a significant impact on reducing back-orders by 14%.”  

As with Williams, Meyer’s performance positively contributed to DLA Aviation’s ability to provide stellar support to its customers.

“To be recognized for this award is such an honor,” Meyer said.

“Mr. Meyer is a driving force within DLA Aviation Cherry Point in support of Fleet Readiness Center East’s organic manufacturing mission,” said Jason Tierson, a chief in the Materiel Management Division, DLA Aviation at Cherry Point. “He has led his team to support the material requirements of over 1000 local stock number and national stock number organic manufacturing awards in FY22 at a total dollar value of $5M in sales. This is well above the volume of any other Navy sites.”

Meyer coordinated with commercial vendors to obtain 21 missing certificates of conformance for on-hand raw stock. The certificates are mandatory when organically manufacturing any aeronautical part. His actions prevented 18 manufacturing jobs from complete work stop. Additionally, through research and 12 expedited requests, he led his team to reduce their unfilled backorders by 30%. 

Tierson said Meyer’s meticulous actions have prevented multiple work stoppages, resulting in continued production across all platforms in support of FRC East and the warfighter.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 20

- 00208

- CR

IN RE Stephen Wayne RICHARDSON

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 22, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 8, 2020, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the

petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly,

the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CU RIAM

Do not publish

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010CR10629, styled The State of Texas v. Stephen Wayne Richardson

, pending in the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez

- Gardner

presiding.
(December 22, 2003)

#### Johanna Acosta et al., Appellants, v Patricia C. Rubin et al., Respondents.

[768 NYS2d 642]

*658In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated August 7, 2002, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that neither plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court dated November 20, 2002, as denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for leave to renew *(see*CPLR 5517 [b]).

Ordered that the order dated November 20, 2002, is reversed insofar as reviewed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for leave to renew is granted, and upon renewal, the order dated August 7, 2002, is vacated, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated August 7, 2002, is dismissed as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiffs.

In opposition to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs submitted affidavits of their treating chiropractor which were not notarized and, consequently, were not considered by the Supreme Court. After the motion was granted, the plaintiffs moved, inter alia, for leave to renew, submitting properly notarized affidavits, an affirmation of counsel explaining that the original affidavits had been notarized but file copies were mistakenly submitted, and an affidavit of the chiropractor stating that his original affidavits had been properly executed and notarized. Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for leave to renew *(see Vita v Alstom Signaling,*308 AD2d 582 [2003]). Upon renewal, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment should have been denied.

*659Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the defendants established a prima facie case that neither plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Figueroa v Westbury Trans.,*304 AD2d 614 [2003]; *Elfiky v Harris,*301 AD2d 624 [2003]). However, the chiropractor’s affidavit submitted on behalf of the plaintiff Evelyn Malave specifying the decreased range of motion in her lumbar and cervical spines, along with evidence of a herniated disc and disc bulges as confirmed by magnetic resonance image tests, were sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether she sustained a serious injury *(see Jelicks v Camacho,*305 AD2d 373 [2003]). The chiropractor’s affidavit submitted on behalf of the plaintiff Johanna Acosta, which, inter alia, specified the objective tests performed and the decreased range of motion in her lumbar and cervical spines, was also sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 4.36  


 
 

CERTIFICATE OF TRUST    
    
    OF    
    
    LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS CAPITAL TRUST IX    
    


        This Certificate of Trust is being duly executed as of November 23, 2004 for the purposes of forming a statutory trust pursuant to the Delaware Statutory
Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et. seq.) (the "Act"). 


        1.     NAME.
The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is "Lehman Brothers Holdings Capital Trust IX" (the "Trust"). 



        2.     DELAWARE
TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the Delaware resident trustee of the Trust meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the Act are as follows: 



Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, National Association

500 Stanton Christiana Road, 3rd Floor

Newark, Delaware 19713

Attention: Institutional Trust Services





        3.     EFFECTIVE
DATE. This Certificate of Trust, which may be executed in counterparts, shall be effective immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware. 


[Remainder
of page intentionally left blank] 







 

        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the trustees of the Trust, have duly executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first written above. 



	JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

as Property Trustee	 	 
	

By:	
 	

/s/  DIANE P. LEDGER      
	
 	

 
	Name:	 	Diane P. Ledger	 	 
	Title:	 	Assistant Vice President	 	 
	

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

as Delaware Trustee
	

By:	
 	

/s/  TAI BILL LEE      
	
 	

 
	Name:	 	Tai Bill Lee	 	 
	Title:	 	Vice President	 	 
	

By:	
 	

/s/  JEFFREY A. WELIKSON      
 Jeffrey A. Welikson, as Regular Trustee	
 	

 
	

By:	
 	

/s/  BARRETT S. DIPAOLO      
 Barrett S. DiPaolo, as Regular Trustee	
 	

 
	

By:	
 	

/s/  OLIVER BUDDE      
 Oliver Budde, as Regular Trustee	
 	

 




2











QuickLinks


CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS CAPITAL TRUST IX
# C_2014071EN.01002001.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2014 — Goldsteig Käsereien Bayerwald v OHIM — Vieweg (goldstück)

(Case T-47/13) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark goldstück - Earlier Community word mark GOLDSTEIG - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

(2014/C 71/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Goldsteig Käsereien Bayerwald GmbH (Cham, Germany) (represented by: S. Biagosch, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Christin Vieweg (Sonneberg, Germany) (represented by: J. Pröll, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 November 2012 (Case R 2589/2011-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Goldsteig Käsereien Bayerwald GmbH and Ms Christin Vieweg.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Goldsteig Käsereien Bayerwald GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Goldsteig Käsereien Bayerwald GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.

---
EXHIBIT
23.1

















CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-88588, 333-39589,
333-112172 and 333-140724) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-113690, 333-89473, 333-23091, 333-39493, 333-54018, 333-54026, 333-71548,
333-122840, 333-122841, 333-132558, 333-132559, 333-143720, and 333-147240) of
LaserCard Corporation of our reports dated June 4, 2008, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of LaserCard Corporation, included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008.





We also consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report dated June 4, 2008 on the financial statement
schedule which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.








/s/
Odenberg, Ullakko, Muranishi & Co. LLP





San
Francisco, California
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<CIK>                             0001064414
<NAME>                            PECO ENERGY TRANSITION TRUST
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                    169
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          493
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          5,199 <F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     301
<BONDS>                                 4,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            5,199
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          203
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           67
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                2
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
<FN>
<F1>
(1)  Includes Intangible Transition Property of $4,942.
</FN>


</TABLE>