alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p100588.en1.txt INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 10-0588 Post-Focus Draft Revision 1 4/19/2011 ENGINEER: Hall \ JAS PV (kg/yr): 50,000 Import Only Revision Notes / Assessment Overview: Submitter has provided information that indicates that all wastes at processing site are incinerated.| Fax dated 4-7-2011. SUBMITTER: USE: Precursor to polyimide resin used in aircraft material (70%). Precursor to polyimide resin used in electronic and IT material (30%). OTHER USES:

MSDS: No Label: No TLV/PEL: none established.

CRSS : Chemical Name: S-H20: 0.063 g/L @ VP: 1.3E-2 torr @ MW: %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use: SAT (concerns) (10/15/2010): Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P2B2T2  Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb.) Page 1p100588.en1.txt OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

  INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 10-0588 Use: Polyimide Resin MFG Page 2p100588.en1.txt Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Output 2: to: from: basis:

Output 2: to: from:

Output 2: to: from: basis:

Output 2: Page 3p100588.en1.txt to: from: basis:

RELEASE TOTAL kg/yr -
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:
Inhalation:

 Exposure to Upper Bound: Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: Basis:

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW 1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit or data not specific to industry): Page 4p100588.en1.txt 2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? Y OR b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? met) Exposure to Upper Bound: Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: Basis:

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW 1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit or data not specific to industry): 2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? OR b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? met) Dermal: Exposure to High End: Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: Basis:



CALL BY: Organization: CALL TO: Organization: Page 5p100588.en1.txt Date: Time: Phone:

-

Page 6
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Mercado, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 890]

Judgment of resen-tence, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered March 10, 2015, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Following a remand (125 AD3d 409 [1st Dept 2015]) for resentencing pursuant to *People v Rudolph*(21 NY3d 497 [2013]), the court providently exercised its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment, in light of the extreme seriousness of defendant’s multiple violent crimes.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Tom, J.P., Renwick, Gische, Oing and Singh, JJ.
#  DLA Troop Support Subsistence hosts town hall

/ Published May 30, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Subsistence supply chain hosted a town hall on 30 May in Philadelphia. The Subsistence supply chain provides food support for the military all over the world. From individually packaged meals in a soldier's ruck sack, to a ship's galley and to full-service dining facilities on military installations, Subsistence gets that food there. Subsistence also supports other non-Department of Defense activities, such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the State Department, Veterans’ Homes and more.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         111,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  195,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,112
<INVENTORY>                                    176,967
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               517,530
<PP&E>                                         756,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                 395,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,208,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          250,174
<BONDS>                                        382,163
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,984
<OTHER-SE>                                     363,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,208,368
<SALES>                                      1,168,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,179,455
<CGS>                                          741,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  741,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,547
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,147
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,704
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,704
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35
        

</TABLE>
#### Aron Grinshpun et al., Respondents, v Gennady Borokhovich, Also Known as Eugene Borokhovich, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[49 NYS3d 114]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered November 9, 2015, which denied defendant Gen-nady Borokhovich’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered November 11, 2011, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant failed to show, in support of vacatur pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (2), that the agreements in which plaintiffs allegedly released him from liability “could not have been previously discovered by the exercise of due diligence” *(Prote Contr. Co. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.,*230 AD2d 32, 39 [1st Dept 1997]). Defendant has been in possession of the agreements since the inception of the litigation. While he claims that he was unable to access the agreements due to hurricane damage to his home office and marital difficulties, lack of access did not prevent him from alerting the court to their existence. Defend*448ant claims that he did not know of the releases. However, he admits knowing that plaintiffs “promised to release him” and that, in consideration for one of the agreements, he was to be “left in peace.” This knowledge should have prompted further inquiry. At the very least, defendant should have brought the November 2006 release to the court’s attention when it was produced to his attorneys, one year before the instant motion was made.

Defendant failed to show, in support of vacatur pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3), the existence of fraud *(see Thakur v Thakur,*49 AD3d 861 [2d Dept 2008]; *see also Sanchez v Avuben Realty LLC,*78 AD3d 589, 590 [1st Dept 2010]). We note, moreover, that his motion was not brought within a reasonable time *(see Mark v Lenfest,*80 AD3d 426, 426 [1st Dept 2011]).

Defendant’s arguments with respect to the necessity of an inquest and the merits of plaintiffs’ claims are foreclosed by our prior order upholding the default judgment *(see Grinshpun v Borokhovich,*100 AD3d 551 [1st Dept 2012], *lv denied*21 NY3d 857 [2013]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Webber, JJ.
Exhibit 3.6

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                        THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                               CLARK/BARDES, INC.


         Clark/Bardes, Inc. (hereinafter called the "Corporation"), a
corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does hereby certify:

         1. The name of the Corporation is Clark/Bardes, Inc.

         2. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
amended by striking out Article FOURTH thereof and substituting in lieu of said
Article FOURTH the following new Article FOURTH:

            FOURTH: The aggregate number of shares of capital stock which
            the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 41,000,000,
            of which (1) 40,000,000 shares shall be common stock, par
            value $0.01 per share; and (2) 1,000,000 shares shall be
            preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. Unless
            specifically provided otherwise herein, the holders of such
            shares shall be entitled to one vote for each share held in
            any stockholder vote in which any of such holders is entitled
            to participate.

         3. That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in a meeting and vote
of stockholders entitled to vote and authorized by the board of directors'
resolution in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Clark/Bardes, Inc. has caused this Certificate to
be signed by Thomas M. Pyra, its Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating
Officer, this 3rd day of June, 2002.

                                          CLARK/BARDES, INC.



                                     By:           /s/ Thomas M. Pyra
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Thomas M. Pyra
                                          Chief Financial Officer and
                                          Chief Operating Officer
#### Ronell L.L., Matter of (Ronald L.)

2d Dept: 148 AD3d 914 (Proceeding No. 2)

denied
No. 09-11419.

#### In re Allen Glenn Thomas, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 195,

178 L. Ed. 2d 258,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7724.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2459 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2459

To provide a 1-year extension of the applicability of the authority to 
  transfer funds under the programs for block grants regarding mental 
                      health and substance abuse.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 23 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

Mr. Jeffords (for himself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide a 1-year extension of the applicability of the authority to 
  transfer funds under the programs for block grants regarding mental 
                      health and substance abuse.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 205(b) of 
Public Law 102-321 (106 Stat. 415) is amended in each of paragraphs (1) 
and (2) by striking ``1993 or 1994'' and inserting ``1993, 1994, or 
1995''.
                                 <all>
```
#### People v Scattareggia

2d Dept: 150 AD3d 1033

denied
No. 10-5851.

#### Donald W. Stoyer, Petitioner v. Ohio Department of Job & Family Services.

562 U.S. 939, 131 S. Ct. 352,

178 L. Ed. 2d 228,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7502.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County, denied.
District Clerk

Fort Bend County, Texas

Annie Rebecca Elliott

Filed 

5/15/2015 12:10:41 PM

Yolanda Cole

ACCEPTED

13-dcv-203447

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

5/15/2015 2:54:42 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/15/2015 2:54:42 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
No. 10-5437.

#### Bianca Fabione Vereen, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 922, 131 S. Ct. 297,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7232.

178 L. Ed. 2d 194,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*195Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 517.
# Anniston’s Kihlstadius receives Global Distribution Excellence: Vehicle/MHE Management Civilian of the Year

/ Published July 21, 2015
ANNISTON, Alabama, 
Michael Kihlstadius, equipment specialist at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Anniston, Ala., has been awarded the 2014 Global Distribution Excellence Award: Vehicle/MHE Management Civilian of the Year for his work in developing the MHE training program at the distribution center.
Kihlstadius is the founder and senior material handling equipment trainer for DLA Distribution Anniston.  He instructed and supervised more than 90 employees, resulting in an increase in operator knowledge and a program that has been recognized by DLA Distribution headquarters.

He was instrumental in attaining a certified “train the trainer” course for overhead cranes.  “This training has improved not only our operations, but also safety within the organization and morale of the employees using the overhead cranes,” said Army Lt. Col. Hattie Richardson, the distribution center’s commander.

Kihlstadius helped to create a computer-based training classroom, which doubled the capacity for computer training sessions.  He also created a video teleconferencing and proctor-based training classroom that can accommodate large-scale training sessions that support sister distribution centers and other organizations on the installation.

As a part of the vehicle and MHE licensing program, Kihlstadius developed a database system to ensure employee licenses are valid, and that training documentation is on file to support the licenses.

“Mr. Kihlstadius is an invaluable asset to our organization,” said Richardson.  “He is highly-reliable, has an industrious attitude, and promotes high morale and good will for us all.”
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Atlatsa Resources Corporation (the Registrant) filed under cover of Form 20-F for the period ended
December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Harold Motaung as Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant and Boipelo Lekubo as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Harold Motaung
|                   | 
|By:                |  | Harold Motaung         
|                   | 
|Title:             |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|Dated:             |  | March 30, 2016         



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Boipelo Lekubo
|                   | 
|By:                |  | Boipelo Lekubo         
|                   | 
|Title:             |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                   | 
|Dated:             |  | March 30, 2016         

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 12-8300.

#### Lindensmith *v.*Berghuis, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CALVIN DELEON TURNER, JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4504 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 27, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and David B. Falstad, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan S. Tannen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
No. 10-5375.

#### William W. Zuck, Petitioner v. Nebraska.

562 U.S. 918, 131 S. Ct. 286,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6862.

178 L. Ed. 2d 188,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nebraska denied.
UAS Pilot in Command (PIC)

Hgh Flight Photo asserts that under § 61.113 (a) and (b) private pilots are limited to noncommercial operations, however he can achieve an equivalent level of safely as aChleved by current regulations because his UAS does not carry any pibts or passengers. Further while helpful, a pilot license will not ensure remote oontrol piloting skills. We believe that the risks of operating a UAS are far less lhan the risk levels inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 CFR part 61, et seq., thus he requests an exemption from § 61.113 Private Pilot Privileges

and Limitations: Pilot in oommand.

Regarding UAS operational trainirrg, the High Flight Photo has fbwn numerous praelice flights in remote areas as a hobbyist simulating flights for future oommercial use to gain familfarization with ltle Charaeteristics of his UAS' perforrnance under d'rfferent temperature and weather oonditions. He further slales thal he praaloes Computerizetl simulated flights to maintain adequate skills and response reflex time. The PIC for High Flight Photo currenUy holds an FAA ATP certific,ate with a cunent 3rd olass physioal (See attaoh)

UAS Operafing Parameters

High Flight Photo will abide by the following additional operatirrg cond'Rions under this exemption: • operate the UAS below 300 feet and within a radius distanoe of 1000 teet from the controller to both aid in direct line of sight visual observalion;l • operate the UAS for 3-7 minutes per flight; • land the UAS prior to the manufacturer's reoommended minimum level of battery

power; • operate the UAS only within visual line of sight (VLOS); • use the UAS' global positioning system (GPS) flight safety feature whereby it hovers and then slowly lands if communication with the remote oontrol pibt is lost: • oonduct all operatrons under his own personal and flight safety prol000ls (induding posting a warning sign reading: "Attention Aerial Photography in Progress — Remafn Back 150 feet') contained in the operating docunlenls and will aetively anatyZe flight data and other sources of information to oonstantty update and enhance fiis safety protocols: • oontaa respective airports ff operaUons will be within 5 miles to ativise them of his esDmated flight time, flight duration, elevatioh of flight and other pertinent information; • always obtain all necessary permissions prior to operration; and • have procedures in place to abort flights in the event of safety breaches or potential danger.

High FligM Photo states that § 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airvrorthiness certlficate. High Flight Photo asserts lhat SirlCe there is Currantty no oertificate applicable to his operation, this regulation is inapplieable. 91.9(b)(2) requires an aircrrafl flight manual in the aircraft, however since there are no pilots or passengers on board hiS airoraft and given its size, this regulation is inapplicable. High F6ght Photo can maintain an equivalent level of safety by maintaining a safety/Plight manual with the UAS ground station.

Public lnterest



# 7
# DLA Troop Support bids farewell to civilian retirees

/ Published Oct. 30, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support said ‘so long’ to two civilian employees during a retirement ceremony Oct. 29 in Philadelphia.

Robert Hutkowski of the Construction and Equipment supply chain retired after 36 years of federal service, and Pauline Clark-Cox of the Equal Employment Opportunity Office retired after 35 years of service.

DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Gavin Lawrence presided over the ceremony and thanked them for their combined 71 years of service to the warfighters throughout their career.

“As the DLA Troop Support Commander, I am honored to celebrate the dedicated workforce here in our Philadelphia headquarters,” Lawrence said. “It is a privilege to have this opportunity to celebrate those civilians who have given so much of themselves in support of our warfighters serving around the world.”

Lawrence presented Hutkowski and Clark-Cox with certificates of retirement, DLA Troop Support mementos and a commander’s coin. A certificate of appreciation was also presented to Hutkowski’s wife, Chong Hui.

Hutkowski started his career at the Defense Industrial Supply Center’s special contracts branch. After a promotion, he served as the team leader and contracting officer in the bearings branch, where he oversaw the planning and procurement of a $3 million renovation and systems furniture contract. He eventually went to work in the firefighting prime vendor program and is retiring as a contract specialist in C&E’s heavy equipment procurement program.

“I couldn’t have done this job without all of the help and all the support that I received over the years from all the division chiefs and branch chiefs and supervisors who helped me along the way,” he said. “And also, more importantly, all my coworkers, whether they were item managers or supply planners, everybody that lends a hand here and helps the buyer and contracting officer’s job to go easy.

Clark-Cox worked in the private sector before starting her federal career in 1985 as a temporary employee with the U.S. Navy. In 1988, she started working at the Defense Industrial Supply Center. She has been a part of the Equal Employment Opportunity Office since 1991.

“It was a pleasure to work here at DLA Troop Support for that long period of time,” Clark-Cox said. “I just want to thank everybody at DLA who helped me out.”