alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### River Square Realty Corp., Plaintiff, and William V. Lentini et al., Respondents, v Jesse Lentini, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 319]

*233Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin Diamond, J.), entered September 23, 2002, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (b) for a new trial upon his counterclaim for waste, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The minimal appellate record before us provides no basis to conclude that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. Defendant’s self-serving account of the events leading to the alleged decrease in potential profits from the building he owned with his family members affords no ground for us to conclude that the trial court’s determination that the counterclaim should be dismissed was premised upon mistakes of fact and erroneous trial rulings, as defendant contends. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams and Lerner, JJ.
NO. 08-21-00142- CR

JOSE DEMETRIO PIN ED A * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT * * V. * 8 TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS * * STATE OF TEXAS * AT E L PASO , TEXAS APPELLEE

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

Please enter the appearance of Susannah E. Prucka as an attorney for the State of Texas in

this case.

Dated: November 3, 2021 Respectfully submitted
,

AMANDA NAVARETTE District Attorney Winkler and Crane Count ies

/s/Susannah E. Prucka SUSANNAH E. PRUCKA Special Prosecutor State Bar No. 24076105 susannahprucka@gmail.com

PO Box 1041 Kermit, Texas 79745 432.586.3700 432.586.3208 fax

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct of the foregoing document was sent on November

3 , 202 1, by transmission through the authorized electronic filing manager or as otherwise

permitted by law to Michele Greene ., the attorney of record for Appellant.

/s/Susannah E. Prucka SUSANNAH E. PRUCKA ACCEPTED 08-21-00142-CR EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS

EL PASO, TEXAS 11/3/2021 10:46 AM ELIZABETH G. FLORES

CLERK 08-21-00142-CR

### Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

Susannah Prucka on behalf of Susannah Prucka Bar No. 24076105 susannahprucka@gmail.com Envelope ID: 58810279 Status as of 11/3/2021 2:27 PM MST

Case Contacts

Name

M. Michele Greene BarNumber

789966 Email

mmg@michelegreenelaw.com TimestampSubmitted

11/3/2021 10:46:45 AM Status

SENT
#### People v Blue

2d Dept: 136 AD3d 840 (Kings)

denied 8/1/16 (Rivera, J.)
No. 09-10552.

#### Zane Johnson, Petitioner v. Steve Bailey, et al.

562 U.S. 846, 131 S. Ct. 89,

178 L. Ed. 2d 56,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5997.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 367 Fed. Appx. 451.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Esau Davis, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 302]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered November 19, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Tom, J.P, Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
No. 10-5265.

#### Charles C. Graham, Petitioner v. Missouri.

562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 268,

178 L. Ed. 2d 176,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6907,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, denied.

Same case below, 306 S.W.3d 613.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33474]


Iowa Interstate Railroad, Ltd.--Lease and Operation Exemption--
Union Pacific Railroad Company

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of Exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board exempts from the requirements 
of 49 U.S.C. 10902 the lease by Iowa Interstate Railroad, Ltd. (IAIS) 
and operation of 6.4 miles of railroad owned by Union Pacific Railroad 
Company between milepost 358.568 at Des Moines, IA, and milepost 365.0 
at West Des Moines, IA, in Polk County, IA, subject to labor protective 
conditions.

DATES: The exemption will be effective 60 days after IAIS certifies to 
the Board that it has posted at the workplace of the employees on the 
affected line, and served on the national offices of the labor unions 
with employees on the affected line, a notice of the transaction, 
setting forth the types and numbers of jobs expected to be available, 
the terms of employment and principles of employee selection, and the 
line that is to be leased. Petitions to stay must be filed by February 
23, 1998. Petitions to reopen must be filed by March 16, 1998.\1\

    \1\ The due dates for petitions for stay and reopening 
presuppose that IAIS will promptly certify that the required notice 
to employees has been given, and that the employees therefore have a 
reasonable period of time in which to file any petition. Should IAIS 
be delayed for a significant period of time in making that 
certification, we will entertain requests to extend the period of 
time for filing petitions to stay or reopen.

ADDRESSES: An original and 10 copies of all pleadings referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33474 must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001; in addition, a copy of all pleadings must be 
served on petitioner's representative: T. Scott Bannister, 1300 Des 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moines Building, 405-6th Avenue, Des Moines, IA 50309.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar (202) 565-1600. [TDD 
for the hearing impaired (202) 565-1695.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call or pick up in person from: DC NEWS & DATA, INC., 1925 K Street, 
N.W., Suite 210, Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 289-4357. 
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services 
(202) 565-1695.]

    Decided: January 12, 1998.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1637 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Medina-Feliz, Appellant.

[57 NYS3d 475]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Neil E. Ross, J.), rendered November 14, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of three years, unanimously reversed, on the law, the pleas as to both counts vacated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

This is a “rare case” where the preservation requirement for challenges to guilty pleas does not apply because “defendant’s factual recitation negate [d] an essential element of the crime pleaded to” and the court “accept [ed] the plea without making further inquiry to ensure that defendant understood] the nature of the charge and that the plea [was] intelligently entered” *(People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]). The crime of attempted possession of a weapon in the second degree requires that a defendant intend to use the weapon unlawfully against another. However, during the plea colloquy, defendant explicitly, repeatedly and consistently denied any intent to use the weapon against anyone, lawfully or otherwise, at the time the police recovered it or at any other time. The court asked followup questions, but they were ineffectual because defendant’s responses only reconfirmed that he expressly denied having the requisite intent. Although an express admission of unlawful intent may not have been necessary in the first place, particularly because such intent is presumed *(see*Penal Law § 265.15 [4]), defendant expressly negated that intent.

Because the promise of concurrent sentences can no longer be fulfilled, defendant is also entitled to vacatur of his plea to possession of a controlled substance *(see People v Rowland,*8 NY3d 342 [2007]; *People v Pichardo,*1 NY3d 126 [2003]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.
EXHIBIT 10.2


 


July 1, 2004


 


CONSULTING AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) made effective as
of  July 1, 2004, between Datameg Corp., a
New York corporation (the “Company”), and James Murphy (“Consultant”).


 


WHEREAS, Consultant possesses knowledge and skills
that can be beneficial to Company; and


 


WHEREAS, the President of the Company (the “President”)
recognizes that the Consultant’s contribution to the growth and success of the
Company can be substantial


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties agree as follows:


 


1. Employment. The Company shall employ Consultant and
Consultant shall serve the Company, on the terms and conditions set forth
herein, for the period commencing on the date hereof.  Thereafter, the term of this Agreement may be
extended and renewed on an annual basis for additional periods of ninety days
each upon written agreement of the parties made at least 30 days prior to the
expiration of the initial term or the then current renewal term, as the case
may be. The term of this Agreement, as it may from time to time be extended in
accordance with this Paragraph, may be referred to herein as the “Period of
Employment.”


 


2. Position and Duties. Consultant shall perform the
functions and duties as shall be reasonably prescribed from time to time by the
President provided that such functions and duties are consistent with and
attendant to Consultant’s position or other positions that he may hold from
time to time. Consultant shall devote all of his working time and efforts to
the business and affairs of the Company and the promotion of its interests and
perform all duties and services on behalf of the Company necessary to carry out
such functions.


 


3. Compensation and Related Matters.


 


(a) Consultant shall receive a stock grant in the
amount of 5,000,000 shares of  DataMEG
Corp. Common Stock, Restricted.


 


(b) Expenses. Consultant shall be entitled to receive
prompt reimbursement for all reasonable expenses incurred by him during any
Period of Employment (in accordance with the policies and procedures then in
effect and established by the Company for its senior consultant officers) in
performing services hereunder, provided that Consultant properly accounts
therefore in accordance with Company policy.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Agreement effective on the date and year written above.


 





















 


	
   

  	
  Datameg Corp

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  James Murphy, Consultant

  	
  Andrew Benson, President

  
					



 


2
No. 10-5507.

#### Bennett Tressler, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 926, 131 S. Ct. 311,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7251.

178 L. Ed. 2d 202,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 35 So. 3d 33.
%~* STA% UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

< ~d Z 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 4”~q~ PRO1~’ October 15, 2014
Mexican Water Chapter, Navajo Nation Reservation Red Mesa TP #1019, HC 61 Box 38 TeecNosPos, AZ 86514 ATTN: Martha Saggboy Subject: Requestto retain public documents atthe Mexican Water Chapter for public

inspection Dear Ms. Saggboy: The purpose ofthis letter is to requestthatthe Mexican Water Chapter ofthe Navajo Nation Reservation retain the enclosed documents atthe Chapter House forat least sixty (60) days for public inspection. These documents are the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s preliminary decision forthe proposed Clean AirAct Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration amendment permit forthe McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation nearthe city of Aneth, San Juan County, Utah. These documents are currently available for public comment. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shaheerah(~,epa.gov ifyou have any questions. Sincerely,

Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer Permits Office Air Division
Enclosures
Schedule of Change in Control and Severance Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10(a)(5) 
  
 SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL AND SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS 
  

			
	 	  	 
	 Patrick D. Henneberry
	  	 
	 Darrell D. Swank
	  	 
	 T. Kay Hastings
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

HARBURG MEDICAL SALES COMPANY,

Petitioner

v.

STATE WORKERS' INSURANCE FUND (BUREAU OF WORKERS'

COMPENSATION FEE REVIEW HEARING OFFICE),

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 325 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of December, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
No. 10-5087.

#### Kent C. Foster, Petitioner v. Jennifer L. Sargus, et al.

562 U.S. 903, 131 S. Ct. 239,

178 L. Ed. 2d 159,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6254.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 09-11553.

#### Lawton Tyson, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 887, 131 S. Ct. 219,

178 L. Ed. 2d 132,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7066,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. D-2540.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Barry Roy Nager.

562 U.S. 814, 131 S. Ct. 405,

178 L. Ed. 2d 270,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7544.

October 4, 2010.

Barry Roy Nager, of West Springs, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
# Contracting sees increase in revenue and industry engagements in 2022

/ Published Nov. 8, 2022
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
The Defense Logistics Agency contracting office’s main goal is to provide the best value contacting services to support the warfighter. During 2022 the contracting office achieved this goal through increasing revenue, industry engagement and cost avoidance.

One of the positive outcomes from the past year is the fact that contracting division was able to generate $89.43 million in revenue. While this amount doesn’t allow Disposition Services to turn a profit, the money still helps the agency’s bottom line as well as the American public.

“The advantage to us getting to sell things to the public is that every dollar we make off a public sale offsets our budget,” said Director Mike Cannon. “We actually save the taxpayer about $250 million a year because of the money generated off of sales which then offset our business costs. This is a way we try to work effectively and efficiently for the support of the warfighter.”

Yet another means of cost avoidance was the completion of a public sale for towing, dismantling and recycling five retired U.S. Navy vessels. The ships were transported to Brownsville, Texas, where they are dismantled, and the scrap is then sold by Disposition Services. Through this ship recycling project, the agency saved the Navy $20 million.

Additionally, the agency held the first Industry Day in November – welcoming current and potential industry partners from around the world to the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center in Battle Creek, Michigan. The event introduced new and innovative methods of tackling challenges as well as helped the contracting team develop better quality contracts.

“We’re very pleased with the turnout,” said Director of Contracting Tracy Hart. “We have a good mix of experienced and inexperienced contractors, large and small, hitting several states and countries. And we have representatives from different industry sectors whether it be hazardous waste disposal service contracts, operational or public sales contracts.” 

During 2022 the newly developed Requirements Branch grew in scope and efficiency. Through multiple efforts with Disposition Services regional contracting officers, contracting officer representatives and sales points of contacts the agency reduced the overall lead time for processing – allowing the completion of 124 public sales referrals.

The contracting division plays an integral role in DLA accomplishing its mission of remaining America’s combat logistics support agency through its operational, sales and hazardous waste offices.

“I see [the contracting team] as enablers of the organizational mission,” said Roxanne Banks, deputy director of the Defense Logistics Agency Acquisition. “When it is determined that they need to contract something out they turn to the requirements owners and work to put sound packages together in accordance with compliance rules. They have oversight of the entire process and see it through execution.”

For the contracting team, compliance and requirements are two things they will continue to oversee and focus their efforts into the new year.
No. 09-11206.

#### Terry Lynn Eady, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 867, 131 S. Ct. 158,

178 L. Ed. 2d 95,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6546.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 82.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14208]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,-483]


Eagle Moulding, Yuba City, California; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on April 27, 1998 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on April 27, 1998 on behalf of workers at Eagle Moulding 
Company, Yuba City, California.
    The petitioner has requested that petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 11th day of May, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-14208 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15653]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Review of an Information 
Collection: Information and Instructions on Your Reconsideration 
Rights, RI 38-47

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget a request for review of an information 
collection. Information and Instructions on Your Reconsideration 
Rights, RI 38-47, outlines the procedures required to request 
reconsideration of an initial OPM decision about Civil Service or 
Federal Employees retirement, Retired Federal or Federal Employee 
Health Benefits requests to enroll or change enrollment, or Federal 
Employees' Group Life Insurance coverage. The forms lists the 
procedures and time periods required for requesting reconsideration.
    Approximately 6,000 annuitants and survivors request 
reconsideration annually. We estimate it takes approximately 45 minutes 
to apply. The annual burden is 4500 hours.
    Comments are particularly invited on:

--Whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of functions of the Office of Personnel Management, and 
whether it will have practical utility;

--Whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection is 
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and
--Ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on those who are to respond, through use of the appropriate 
technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cba1a6adaab9b9a4a58ba4bba6e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bad0d7dcdbc8c8d5d4fad5cad794ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before August 
11, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, 
Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, U.S. 
Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 3349, 
Washington, DC 20415.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION--CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Budget & Administrative Services Division, (202) 
606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Director.
[FR Doc. 98-15653 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### 14910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTAnON NlJ SV>tOOL Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 (Docket No. FAA-2010-0S48j Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-041-AD; Amendme 

# 39J*~*l}.~

l20102'?*J

## D

# 'Q RlN 

### 2120-AA64 Ainvorthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-700-1AIO and BD-700-1AII Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT).

above. This AD results [Tommandatory continuing aiIWorthiness information (MeA!) ('"; /0 iIlSGS'fMIlOL

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe ATE condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: Following five reported cases ofbalance washer screw failure on similar RATs [ram air turbines ]/air driven generators installed on other aircraft types, an investigation 

## ** * detemlined that a specific batch ofthe screws had ametallographic non-confonnity that increased their susceptibility to brittle fracture. 

## * * * Failure of abalance washer screw can result in loss ofthe related balance washer, with consequent turbine imbalance. Such imbalance could potentially result in RAT structural failure (including blade failure), loss of RAT electrical power and structural damage to the aircraft and, if deployment was activated by adual engine shutdown, could also result in loss ofhydraulic power forthe night controls [and consequent reduced ability of the flightcrew to maintain the safe flight and landing ofthe airplane]. 'Oln'll«; ~VM80L

'Oumrn SVMElOL

NIT1AU.SIG

IT

ImNGSV"'OOL