alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Troop Support honors 516 years of service 

/ Published Dec. 7, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support celebrated 516 years of combined service during a retirement ceremony for fifteen employees on Dec. 6 in Philadelphia. 

On this day, Troop Support honored these employees from the DLA Clothing and Textiles supply chain: 
      -  Perry Bradley – 42 years of service  
      -  Sharon Piecyk – 42 years of service  
      -  LeVern Rose – 40 years of service  
      -  Anthony D’Avella Jr. – 38 years of service  

From the DLA Construction and Equipment supply chain: 
      -  Marvin Doughty –39 years of service  

From the DLA Medical supply chain: 
      -  Carmen Brown – 42 years of service  
      -  Elizabeth McMaster – 36 years of service  
      -  Robert Zalewski – 32 years of service  

From the DLA Subsistence supply chain: 
      -  Priscilla Reed – 38 years of service  
      -  Harry Streibich – 38 years of service  
      -  James LeViness – 16 years of service  
      -  Margaret Hightower – 16 years of service  

From the DLA J3/5 Operations and Plans directorate: 
      -  Sara Pooler – 39 years of service  
      -  Kathleen Nitka – 38 years of service  
      -  Kim Angeny – 20 years of service  

DLA Troop Support’s Commander Army Col. Landis C. Maddox presided over the ceremony, and said it was a true honor to celebrate so many individuals. 

“I always enjoy doing these ceremonies, celebrating our outstanding teammates, but this is by far the largest group of individuals that I get to honor,” said Maddox. 

Many of the retirees in the ceremony had begun their federal service careers as GS-1s or GS-3s and some have risen through the ranks to positions of significant responsibility and authority. 

“Every one of you have accomplished so much in service to your nation,” Maddox said. “Your years of service have made you a part of the rich history and exceptional reputation of DLA Troop Support and its legacy organizations.” 

The ceremony was attended by many family members, current or former co-workers and friends. 

“Please accept my most sincere gratitude for all you have done in service to our nation, the Defense Logistics Agency and—most importantly—the men and women of the armed forces,” Maddox said. “On behalf of myself and the entire workforce, I wish you and your family all the best in your retirement!”
# DLA Distribution Bahrain welcomes new director

/ Published June 18, 2015
MANAMA, Bahrain, 
Paul A. McMillan assumed command of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Bahrain, Southwest Asia, in a ceremony June 18.  The ceremony was officiated by DLA Distribution commander Army Brig. Gen. Richard Dix.
“DLA Distribution is here to support our Nation’s military around the world and at any given moment these soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines are serving in harm’s way in some of the most austere, difficult environments in the world,” said Dix.  “I know Mr. McMillan will uphold our legacy of efficiency, effectiveness and best value so we continue to remain relevant well into the future.”

A retired air force chief master sgt., McMillan has served in a wide range of logistics assignments, beginning in 1980.  He contributed to the Ground Launched Cruise Missile program and served on the Intermediate Nuclear Force Treaty Inspection Team at Florennes, Belgium.  He developed the Headquarters Air Force Special Operations Command Munitions Directorate and served as the munitions liaison to the J4 directorate at Headquarters U.S. Special Operations Command, where he provided munitions expertise and guidance to all DoD branches within Special Forces.  

In 1998, McMillan was assigned as the supply superintendent to the National Science Foundation’s United States Antarctic Program for Operation Deep Freeze in Christchurch, New Zealand, the longest running military operation in history.  He served as a lead member in the transfer of Antarctic military operations from the U.S. Navy to the U.S. Air Force. He held additional duties as the contracting officer representative, transportation management officer, maintenance superintendent, and senior enlisted advisor to more than 1,000 deployed personnel.

After retiring from the Air Force in 2006, McMillan started his DLA career and became the site manager for DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas.  McMillan later served as the operations officer for DLA Distribution Europe, and served as the deputy commander for DLA Distribution Anniston, Ala., from 2010 to 2015. 

McMillan became the deputy commander of DLA Distribution Bahrain in February 2015.

A graduate of the Institute for Defense and Business Depot and Arsenal Executive Leadership Program from the University of North Carolina, McMillan also studied logistics at the Community College of the Air Force.  In addition, he holds an executive Champions Certificate in Lean Six Sigma from North Carolina State University.

His awards include the Exceptional Meritorious Civilian Service Award and the Meritorious Civilian Service Award.
# DLA Energy supports Ulchi Freedom Guardian exercise

/ Published Sept. 2, 2015
CAMP WALKER, South Korea, DLA Energy Pacific at Korea
#### Fiedler, In re; Bitts, In re

08/03/2016

95 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 132 A.3d 1010
# Employee Spotlight: Eric Terrell Brown Sr.

/ Published June 6, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs.*

**Name:** Eric Terrell Brown Sr.

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Ogden Support Center Pacific at Kadena Air Force Base, Japan

**Years of service:** 6 months

**What is your job title and what do you do specifically?** As a supply technician, I perform detailed inspections on incoming shipments to guarantee the correct material and quantities are delivered to DLA Aviation at Kadena Air Force Base in Okinawa, Japan. I also pull orders from inventory generated by maintenance units and work centers requesting parts for repair.

**How do you support the warfighter?** I support the warfighter with my own personal commitment to DLA as an employee by recognizing that my efforts deliver readiness and expedited support to troops and organizations worldwide.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction?  Why?** As a Navy veteran, by working for DLA, I get to continue my support to the warfighter. And I find it very satisfying knowing that I have completed my job with zero errors while learning more about the organization.

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?** I would tell the warfighters to have faith in the support we are providing to them, and for them to know they are just as important to us as we are to them! They are our extended family, and we will continue to work hard to deliver support no matter where they are.

**What are your best practices for achieving goals or accomplishing tasks?**I approach projects or tasks that have been assigned to me by creating a plan of action. It is also important for me to be conscious and not create bad habits that could impede my work or the progress of my professional growth.

**Professionally, where do you see yourself five years from now?**In five years, I see myself working at DLA Aviation as a material support technician or promoted to a customer support technician. The customer support technician is a demanding, challenging, and rewarding position involving detailed research. I would continue supporting the customer directly but would also be helping the workforce in correcting issues that create material delays or stoppages.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?** I really enjoy studying foreign languages, traveling, and reading a good book.

**If you could pick a personal motto, what would it be and why?** I stand by the quote by David Goggins, *“The most important conversations you’ll ever have are the ones you’ll have with yourself.”* This statement speaks for itself because you need be able to condition your mind and protect your heart from bad influences.
No. 09-11282.

#### Roger Gordon, Petitioner v. State Bar of California, et al.

562 U.S. 871, 131 S. Ct. 172,

178 L. Ed. 2d 103,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7053.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 833.
No. 10-5933.

#### Leobardo Villarreal, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 942, 131 S. Ct. 360,

178 L. Ed. 2d 232,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7234.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*233Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 467.
No. 09-11547.

#### Willie Spates, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 887, 131 S. Ct. 218,

178 L. Ed. 2d 131,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7055.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 394 Ill. App. 3d 1115, 369 Ill. Dec. 99, 985 N.E.2d 1085.
No. 10-6145.

#### Michael Eugene Farmer, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 945, 131 S. Ct. 370,

178 L. Ed. 2d 240,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7831.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 303.
# C_2014024EN.01000801.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Nederland) lodged on 15 November 2013 — P v Commissie Sociale Zekerheid Breda, S v College van Burgemeester en Wethouders van de gemeente Amstelveen

(Case C-579/13)

2014/C 24/14

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: P

Applicant:

Defendant: Commissie Sociale Zekerheid Breda

Defendant:

&

Applicant: S

Applicant:

Defendant: College van Burgemeester en Wethouders van de gemeente Amstelveen

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the aim and scope of Directive 2003/109/EC, (1) or of Article 5(2) and/or of Article 11(1) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that the imposition of the civic integration obligation, under national law, on third-country nationals who have acquired long-term resident status, with penalties in the form of a system of fines, cannot be reconciled therewith? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the aim and scope of Directive 2003/109/EC, (1) or of Article 5(2) and/or of Article 11(1) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that the imposition of the civic integration obligation, under national law, on third-country nationals who have acquired long-term resident status, with penalties in the form of a system of fines, cannot be reconciled therewith?

1

| 2. | In answering the first question, is it relevant whether the civic integration obligation was imposed before long-term resident status was granted? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In answering the first question, is it relevant whether the civic integration obligation was imposed before long-term resident status was granted?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44).

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2426 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2426

To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to prohibit 
   the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from recapturing, 
 adjusting, withdrawing, or reducing any UDAG funds from recipients of 
                  UDAG grants, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 25 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

 Mr. Lautenberg (for himself Mr. Leahy, Mr. D'Amato, and Mr. Wofford) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to prohibit 
   the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development from recapturing, 
 adjusting, withdrawing, or reducing any UDAG funds from recipients of 
                  UDAG grants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UDAG RECAPTURES.

    (a) In General.--Section 119(g) of the Housing and Community 
Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5318(g)) is amended by striking the 
second sentence and inserting the following: ``Except as provided in 
section 232(c) of the Multifamily Housing Property Disposition Reform 
Act of 1994, during the 18-month period beginning on the date on which 
the UDAG Retention Program authorized by such section expires, the 
Secretary shall be prohibited from recapturing, adjusting, withdrawing, 
or reducing any UDAG funds from recipients of UDAG grants. For the 
duration of the UDAG Retention Program, the Secretary--
            ``(1) shall provide technical assistance to grant 
        recipients to adjust, rework, relocate, refine, redefine, or 
        otherwise revise the original UDAG project description to 
        produce a viable UDAG project in accordance with the 
        requirements of this section; and
            ``(2) shall not impose regulatory requirements that are not 
        statutorily based if such requirements restrict the revision or 
        use of UDAG funding, including any requirement that amendments 
        to an urban development action grant agreement must be for 
        activities that are `integrally related activities' in relation 
        to the approved project.''.
    (b) Extension of Time Period.--Section 119(t) of the Housing and 
Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5318(t)) is amended by 
striking ``90 days'' each place it appears and inserting ``21 months''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10-5210.

#### Basil J. Kyles, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 953, 131 S. Ct. 258,

178 L. Ed. 2d 251,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7849.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

*252Same case below, 601 F.3d 78.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15842]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 30, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. The Peoples Bancshares, Inc., Sardis, Tennessee; to engage in 
the leasing of personal or real property, pursuant to Sec.  
225.28(b)(3) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 10, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15842 Filed 6-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
No. 10-5658.

#### Robert D. Paige, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 933, 131 S. Ct. 333,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7324.

178 L. Ed. 2d 217,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 604 F.3d 1268.
# Busch shares leadership principles, future outlook at Distribution town hall

/ Published May 19, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, DLA Distribution
No. 10-5285.

#### Frank Williams, Jr., Petitioner v. Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

562 U.S. 913, 131 S. Ct. 271,

178 L. Ed. 2d 179,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6955.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.

Same case below, 2009 Ark. 523, 357 S.W.3d 867.
EXHIBIT 32.1certification pursuant to 18 u.s.c. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of thesarbanes-oxley act of 2002The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to my knowledgethat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification isprovided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or “filed” for anypurpose whatsoever.       Date: November 14, 2007 Name: /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton     Sheldon C. Fenton    Title: Chief Executive Officer
2017-0502.

#### State v. Walker.

Crawford App. No. 3-16-07. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., dissents.
# Fuels Efficiency at Incirlik Air Base

/ Published Dec. 12, 2023
INCIRLIK AIR BASE, Türkiye, 
Airmen at the 39th Logistics Readiness Squadron have recently streamlined their Defense Logistics Agency Automatic Tank Gauging verification process.The squadron’s petroleum, oils, and lubricants flight must manually check the accuracy of their automatic fuel gauging systems of 46 fuel tanks every quarter and every month for specific tanks. This ensures that they maintain accurate fuel levels and monitor water levels correctly for proper removal.Before Tech. Sgt. Robert Simms, 39th LRS fuels facilities noncommissioned officer in charge, led the innovation effort; each tank was documented on its own form and required three separate levels of signatures.This process required nearly 50 separate documents to be created, validated, and routed to the appropriate officials. Because this process had to be completed every three months, requiring 53 labor hours each time, this created an administrative bottleneck.For Simms and his process improvement team, there was a simple solution.The team dedicated several months to creating a single document that consolidated all of the tanks’ information, so now, each level of validation would only need to be completed once per quarter, saving 37 hours labor hours per quarter.“Once we knew we could get approval from the DLA officials to create a revised form, we knew it was the easiest way to improve our process and reduce the administrative processing time,” said Simms.The consolidated document is projected to save the flight approximately 153 work hours per year in administrative time alone. Simms hopes that the Defense Logistics Agency will adopt the form officially, potentially saving time for units across the Air Force.“Even if our form isn’t used as the official form for the verification process, I hope it provides DLA with ideas on improving their form for the DoD,” said Simms. “My biggest takeaway regarding innovation is that it doesn’t have to be some huge project that costs a lot of money. The simplest ideas can make the greatest impact.”Innovation and continuous process improvement can take many different forms. Airmen can seek out the Yellow Belt or Green Belt courses to learn skills that may help them bring innovation to their units.“Anyone can be an agent of innovation,” said Nazan Ogru, 39th Air Base Wing process manager. “We’re always looking to equip the next generation of innovators with the tools they need to make a valuable impact on the mission. Tech. Sgt. Simms is an awesome example of someone who saw a need for change and acted on that need to make things better.”
No. 10-154.

#### Gregory Kereakoglow, Petitioner v. Massachusetts.

562 U.S. 961, 131 S. Ct. 460,

178 L. Ed. 2d 287,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8046.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts denied.

*288Same case below, 456 Mass. 225, 922 N.E.2d 790.
# C_2013377EN.01000602.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 3 October 2013 — Vlaams Gewest v Heidi Van Den Broeck

(Case C-525/13)

2013/C 377/12

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie van België

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Vlaams Gewest

Appellant:

Respondent: Heidi Van Den Broeck

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Must the first paragraph of Article 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001 (1) of 11 December 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying the integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 be interpreted as meaning that the refusal, for the calendar year in question, to grant ‘the aid to which the farmer would have been entitled pursuant to Article 31(2) ... under the aid scheme concerned’, refers to the aid payable in implementation of ‘the aid scheme concerned’, as referred to in Article 1(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 (2) of 27 November 1992 establishing an integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes, so that it is not only the aid for the ‘crop group concerned’ which must be refused, but the entire aid payable in implementation of one of the aid schemes referred to in that provision, of which the crop group concerned forms part?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 327, p. 11.

1

(2)  OJ 1992 L 355, p. 1.

2

---
No. 10-5959.

#### In re Jimmy C. Chisum, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 362,

178 L. Ed. 2d 257,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7826.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.