alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-164.

#### Jerry L. Alston, Petitioner v. Supreme Court of Delaware, et al.

562 U.S. 961, 131 S. Ct. 462,

178 L. Ed. 2d 288,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8092.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.

Same case below, 991 A.2d 17.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA-R07-OAR-2010-0170 ; FRL ] 

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans ; State of 

Missouri 

AGENCY : Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . 

ACTION : Proposed rule . 

SUMMARY : EPA proposes to approve revisions to the Missouri 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the state on June 

17, 2009 . The purpose of these revisions is to rescind the rule 

More Restrictive Emission Limitations for Particulate Matter in 

South St . Louis Area and to approve revisions to the rule 

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial 

Processes which makes corrections and clarifications, and adds 

exemptions to the rule . EPA is proposing approval of the SIP 

provisions pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) . 

DATES : Comments on this proposed action must be received in 

writing by [insert date 30 days from the date of publication in 

the Federal Register] . 

ADDRESSES : Submit your comments, identified by Docket-ID No . 

EPA-R07-OAR-2010-0170, by mail to Amy Bhesania, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 

North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas, 66101 . Comments may also 

be submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by 
2 

following the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of 

the direct final rule located in the rules section of this 

Federal Register . 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Amy Bhesania at (913) 551-

7147, or by e-mail at bhesania .amy@epa .gov . 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : In the final rules section of the 

Federal Register, EPA is approving the state's SIP revision as a 

direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as a noncontroversial revision amendment and 

anticipates no relevant adverse comments to this action . A 

detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct 

final rule . If no relevant adverse comments are received in 

response to this action, no further activity is contemplated in 

relation to this action . If EPA receives relevant adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public 

comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed action . EPA will not institute a second 

comment period on this action . Any parties interested in 

commenting on this action should do so at this time . Please 

note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule 

and if that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not the 

subject of an adverse comment . For additional information, see 
3 

the direct final rule which is located in the rules section of 

this Federal Register . 

Dated: 

-- Z 41i 

July 21, 2010 William Rice, 

Acting Regional Administrator, 

Region 7 .
#### People v Johnson (Jimmie)

4th Dept: 138 AD3d 1454 (Monroe)

denied 8/23/16 (DiFiore, Ch. J.)
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2316

To suspend temporarily the duty on C.I. Pigment Yellow 139.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 26 (legislative day, JULY 20), 1994

Mr. JOHNSTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on C.I. Pigment Yellow

139.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. C.I. PIGMENT YELLOW 139.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.32.32 C.I. Pigment Yellow 139

(CAS No. 36888–99–0)

(provided for in subheading

3204.17.50) ........................ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/97 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
2

•S 2316 IS

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

2 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-205-001]


Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc., Notice of Compliance Tariff 
Filing

June 16, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 12, 1998, Granite State Gas Transmission, 
Inc. (Granite State), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Original Sheet No. 336, 
for effectiveness on May 1, 1998.
    According to Granite State, Substitute Original Sheet No. 336 is 
submitted in compliance with the Commission's order issued May 28, 1998 
in Docket No. RP98-205-000. Granite State further states that, in the 
foregoing order, the Commission accepted tariff sheets filed by Granite 
State proposing a surcharge on its rates for firm and interruptible 
transportation services to recover costs related to an extension of a 
lease of a pipeline facility from Portland Pipe Line for one year, from 
May 1, 1998 to April 30, 1999.
    According to Granite State, when it initially filed the surcharge 
tariff provision, it proposed an effective date of June 1, 1998; later, 
Granite State says that, by letter on May 7th, it requested that the 
surcharge be made effective on May 1 for a period of one year, 
corresponding with the term of the extension of the lease.
    Granite State further states that the Commission accepted the 
surcharge tariff provision for effectiveness on May 1, 1998, and 
Substitute Original Sheet No. 336 has been revised to reflect the 
effectiveness of the surcharge as of May 1, 1998, for one year ending 
April 30, 1999, instead of May 31, 1999, as originally filed.
    Granite State also states that copies of its filing have been 
served on its firm and interruptible customers and on the regulatory 
agencies of the states of Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings.
    Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are 
available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16486 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### In the Matter of William Mitchell, Petitioner, v Richard M. Ambro, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, et al., Respondents.

[47 NYS3d 912]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, in effect, to compel the respondent Richard M. Ambro, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, inter alia, to grant the petitioner’s motion to vacate a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered August 23, 2001, and to dismiss the indictment in the underlying criminal action, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

*811Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary relief of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought *(see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman,*53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

Austin, J.P., Miller, LaSalle and Cohen, JJ., concur.
#### People v Hampton

4th Dept: 139 AD3d 1368 (Monroe)

denied 8/17/16 (Pigott, J.)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2155 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 2155

 To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the 
 cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at 
 Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

 Mr. Hatfield introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the 
 cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at 
 Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory 
Authorization Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. FOREST ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY.

    (a) In General.--Subject to the availability of funds appropriated 
under subsection (c), the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the 
Cooperative State Research Service, shall provide the Federal share of 
the cost of planning and constructing a Forest Ecosystem Research 
Laboratory at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share provided under subsection (a) 
shall be 50 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

                                      <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33372-33373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16253]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6111-9]


Peak Oil Superfund Site Notice of Proposed De Minimis Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed de minimis settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under section 122(g)(4) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) has offered approximately 650 de minimis 
parties at the Peak Oil Superfund Site (Site) an opportunity to enter 
into an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) to settle claims for past 
and future response costs at the Site. On August 28, 1997, EPA 
published the names of 140 parties that returned signature pages 
accepting EPA's offer. Since that time, 37 additional parties have 
submitted signature pages accepting EPA's de minimis settlement offer.
    Following is a list of those additional 37 parties: B&W Corporation 
f/k/a Bowman Transportation, Case International Harvester, Crews 
Equipment Company, City of Fort Myers, City of Wauchula, Compressed Air 
Products, Inc., Crown Datsun n/k/a Crown Nissan, Crown Pontiac, Dundee 
Citrus Growers Association, Eagle Supply, Inc., Fred P. Smith, Inc., 
Graff's Union 76, Grimsley Oil Company, Inc., Haines City Citrus 
Growers Association, Hoagland Oldsmobile, Hough Chevrolet, Jiffy Lube 
International, Inc., Jim McKeel Buick-GMC Trucks n/k/a Blount Buick-GMC 
Trucks, Lake Placid Citrus Growers, Inc., M. Anderson Industries, Inc., 
Nitram, Inc., Okeechobee County School Board, SmithKline Beecham 
Corporation, Peace River Packing

[[Page 33373]]

Company, Penreco, Pinckney, Inc., Polk Nursery Company, Inc., Shell 
Distributor (Hobson Ingram), Sims Crane & Equipment Co. (Sims Crane 
Service, Inc.), Smith Brothers Oil Company, Smoak Groves, Inc., Spring 
Lock Scaffolding, Tampa Bay Hermetics, Inc., Tampa Yacht and Country 
Club, Inc., Tito's Service Center, Inc., United Telephone Company of 
Florida, Unocal Corp., and The Wickie Company.
    EPA will consider public comments on the proposed settlement with 
these 37 parties for thirty days. EPA may withdraw from or modify the 
proposed settlement should such comments disclose facts or 
considerations which indicate the proposed settlement is inappropriate, 
improper, or inadequate. Copies of the proposed settlement are 
available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region IV, Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division, 
61 Forsyth Street, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887.
    Written comment may be submitted to Mr. Greg Armstrong at the above 
address within 30 days of the date of publication.

    Dated: May 27, 1998.
Jewell Harper,
Acting Director, Waste Management Division.
[FR Doc. 98-16253 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
Redline/strikeout of MATS appropriate and necessary piece only 

Bill Maxwell 

to: Cortney_Higgins 

11/07/2011 01:09 PM 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Bryan Hubbell, Amy Lamson, Lydia Wegman, Teresa 

Clemons 

Cortney -- 

Attached for your convenience is a redline/strikeout version of the MATS 

appropriate and necessary piece only. This compares the original version 

you received on October 17 with that which is in the complete package 

submitted last Friday. 

The version sent over on Friday is the new "master" on which future 

comments/edits should be made. 

Thank you. 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450 

MATS A&N preamble 11.3.11 track changes.docx
# DLA highlights successes in new annual report

/ Published Feb. 8, 2024
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency recently released its 2023 Annual Report, “Transforming Global Logistics.”

“In this annual report, we provide a snapshot of our performance over the past year. Through brief descriptions of the agency’s myriad activities, you will soon see that DLA covers a lot of ground, figuratively and literally,” Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic, DLA’s former director, said in the introduction to the annual report. “We operate with a dedicated team of more than 25,000 employees, manage eight supply chains, and provide services for acquisition, storage, distribution, disposition, and more.”

The document details DLA’s successes and key initiatives from 2023 in several areas, including global supply chain performance, acquisition operations, financial highlights, operational environment information, innovation and growth. The report concludes by looking forward to what’s on the horizon for the agency in 2024.

Throughout the year, DLA’s six major subordinate commands and three regional commands worked with 8,500 suppliers and awarded 10,000 contracts a day, 95% of which were automated.

“We enjoyed core mission success, managing over $49.5 billion in contract obligations and executing 3.7 million contract actions. We also met our small-business goal for the 11th consecutive year with small-business contracts worth $18 billion, the most ever,” Skubic said in the document.

View the annual report on DLA's website for full details.
# HQC employees advised to help themselves during health and safety expo  

/ Published May 14, 2015
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia,
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Dexter Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-63959, 33-27597, 33-53307, 33-53309,
333-02985, 333-04081, and 333-42663) of our report dated February 9, 1999, on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Dexter Corporation as of December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, and for
the years then ended, appearing on page F-2 of Dexter Corporation's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
                                          /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
Springfield, Massachusetts
March 9, 1999
# DLA Troop Support says goodbye to seven civilian retirees

/ Published Sept. 1, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support celebrated the retirement of seven civilian employees during a ceremony August 27 in Philadelphia.

DLA Troop Support Deputy Director Richard Ellis presided over the ceremony and congratulated the new retirees on their combined 253 years of federal service.

“As the DLA Troop Support Deputy Commander, I am honored to celebrate the dedicated workforce here in our Philadelphia headquarters,” Ellis said. “I have told people many times that I have never worked for such a dedicated, hard-working, patriotic bunch as the folks here at DLA Troop Support.”

Each retiree received a certificate of retirement, DLA Troop Support mementos and a commander’s coin. In addition, their spouses received a certificate of appreciation.

“Whenever there is a contingency operation or emergency, who does [the military] look to? They look to you, they look to Troop Support to fulfill that mission,” Ellis said. “Your service is indelibly marked on the record of success. Those years are characterized by the excellence embodied and reputation of DLA Troop Support. For that I am truly grateful.”

The retirees were:
      - Nilda Bermontiz, 41 years of service, Construction and Equipment
      - Richard Jankowski, 37 years of service, Business Process Support
      - Vanessa Carter, 37 years of service, Construction and Equipment
      - Tom Scariato, 35 years of service, Construction and Equipment
      - Kenneth O’Donnell, 35 years of service, Procurement
      - Gary Wisniewski, 35 years of service, Construction and Equipment
      - Vincent Valinotti, 33 years of service, Medical
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 27, 2009

s0120 

# Order

January 27, 2009

137602

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137602 COA: 287015 Oakland CC: 07-215386-FH JERRY LYNN WAGNER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 10, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000031364
<NAME> ECKERD CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                          71,874
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,000
<INVENTORY>                                    973,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,151,441
<PP&E>                                         775,690
<DEPRECIATION>                                 329,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,891,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          783,682
<BONDS>                                        779,951
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           704
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,891,952
<SALES>                                      5,376,221
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,376,221
<CGS>                                        4,192,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,192,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               980,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,122
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                137,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,322
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            103,937
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,499)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   102,438
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.42<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS RPIMARY AND DILUTED REFLECTS THE TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT EFFECTED IN THE
FORM OF A STOCK DIVIDEND WHICH WAS PAID ON MAY 13, 1996 TO STOCKHOLDERS OF
RECORD ON APRIL 22, 1996.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Jovan B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 567]

Appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Jacqueline D. Williams, J.), dated July 6, 2016. The order of disposition adjudicated the appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the Administration for Children’s Services for 18 months, less the period spent in detention pending disposition.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in placing him in the custody of the Administration for Children’s Services for 18 months, less the period spent in detention pending disposition *(see Matter of Jalen G.,*104 AD3d 853, 853 [2013]). The record establishes that this disposition was the least restrictive alternative consistent with the best interests of the appellant and the needs of the community *(see*Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]), particularly in light of his failure to attend school, his running away from both his home and pre-disposition detention, his drug use, his need for drug and mental health treatment, his mother’s inability to supervise him adequately, and the recommendations of the Mental Health Services psychologist and the Department of Probation *(see Matter of Ryan*G., 112 AD3d 712, 713 [2013]; *Matter of Paul T.,*107 AD3d 726, 727 [2013]; *Matter of Jalen G.,*104 AD3d at 853-854; *Matter of Jesse F.J.,*83 AD3d 710, 711 [2011]).

The appellant’s arguments that the Family Court should have dismissed the petition or substituted a person in need of supervision adjudication for the juvenile delinquency adjudication are not properly before this Court *(see*Family Ct Act §§ 311.4 [2]; 315.2 [3]; *Matter of Calvin*C., 113 AD3d 678, 678 [2014]).

Leventhal, J.P., Barros, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
#### Com. v. Alston

12/16/2015

478 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 452