alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 231

To amend the Foreign Trade Zones Act to permit the deferral of payment

of duty on certain production equipment.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 27 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Foreign Trade Zones Act to permit the

deferral of payment of duty on certain production equipment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFERRAL OF DUTY ON CERTAIN PRODUCTION

4 EQUIPMENT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3 of the Act of June 18,

6 1934 (commonly known as the Foreign Trade Zones Act,

7 19 U.S.C. 81c) is amended by adding at the end thereof

8 the following new subsection:

9 ‘‘(e) PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT.—
2

•S 231 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other

2 provision of law, if all applicable customs laws are

3 complied with (except as otherwise provided in this

4 subsection), merchandise which may be admitted

5 into a foreign trade zone for use within such zone

6 as production equipment, or parts thereof, shall not

7 be subject to duty until such merchandise is com8 pletely assembled, installed, tested, and used in the

9 production for which it was admitted. The duty

10 chargeable shall be at the same rate as would have

11 been imposed (but for the provisions of this sub12 section) on such production machinery and related

13 equipment, and parts thereof, (taking into account

14 the zone status of the merchandise) had duty been

15 imposed on such production machinery and related

16 equipment, and parts thereof, at the time of entry

17 into the customs territory of the United States.

18 ‘‘(2) FOREIGN TRADE ZONE.—For purposes of

19 this subsection, the term ‘foreign trade zone’ in20 cludes a subzone as defined in section 146.1(b)(17)

21 of chapter 19, Code of Federal Regulations.’’.

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

23 this section shall apply with respect to articles entered,

24 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, after the
3

•S 231 IS

1 date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of

2 this Act.

Æ
No. 09-10738.

#### Gloria Deanna Dickerson, Petitioner v. United Way of New York City.

562 U.S. 950, 131 S. Ct. 105,

178 L. Ed. 2d 247,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7656,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 351 Fed. Appx. 506.
# DLA Distribution hosts Israeli Air Force

/ Published Jan. 15, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 

Maj. Ben Yanovich, Israeli Air Force, visited Defense Logistics Agency Distribution on Jan. 12 to discuss DLA’s global logistics processes and how DLA Distribution supports foreign military sales customers.  

Yanovich began with a DLA Distribution headquarters command overview, highlighting DLA Distribution’s worldwide network, transportation coordination that the organization provides for all of DLA and specialized functions such as kitting and deployable distribution capabilities. 

Following the overview, Yanovich toured the Eastern Distribution Center, part of DLA Distribution Susquehanna and the Department of Defense’s largest warehouse.  Ron Hunziker, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, led Yanovich through the organization’s key locations, including receiving operations, the Consolidation and Containerization Point, the high-rise storage and retrieval system, and the air line of communication pallet build area.The visit was part of DLA Distribution’s ongoing efforts to partner with warfighting customers to provide efficient, effective, and best value support.
No. 10-5518.

#### Samuel Johnson Kangere, Petitioner v. Sheilah Davenport.

562 U.S. 926, 131 S. Ct. 312,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7169,

178 L. Ed. 2d 203,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 371.
No. 10-5906.

#### In re Robert M. Wade, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 358,

178 L. Ed. 2d 257,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7843.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
# DLA Central commander urges new officers to lead by example, care for families 

/ Published Dec. 21, 2015
Tallahassee, Florida,
# Hawaii team helps Pearl Harbor hotel

/ Published Oct. 16, 2023
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
The hospitality arm of Navy Exchange Command recently tapped Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam near Honolulu to develop an excess property disposal plan for more than 2,000 pieces of used Navy Lodge furniture and appliances like air conditioner units and mini fridges.

Disposal Support Representatives Abel Casteneda, Jeffrey Hallauer and Danielle Knoll worked with NEXCOM Supervisory Supplies Technician Stephanie Duensing to institute a three month, four-day-a-week standing appointment for DLA to receive the unneeded items from NEXCOM’s warehouse.  

Pearl Harbor Area Manager Mezekiel Sims said that NEXCOM initially held onto the inventory for possible reuse, but as they began receiving more furniture than expected and simultaneously needed to surrender some storage capacity, they reached out to Sims’ DLA team for help.

Former DSR Danielle Knoll, who conducted an initial site visit, arranged for Duensing to attend a property turn-in class, and provided personal instruction and guidance on how to fill out turn-in documents, said the DLA team’s communication and coordination with NEXCOM was top notch. Sims agreed.

“Our Hawaii personnel are outstanding,” said Sims. “They are quick to answer any customer questions and provide one-on-one training on property turn in and reuse processes, and they proactively schedule site visits to gives customer the best possible guidance. This team has done an amazing job going above and beyond to provide the best support and guidance to the warfighter.” 

The agency provides property disposal support to nearly 40 Navy Lodge facilities at installations across the globe and to an even more expansive network of Air Force Inns, Army Lodges and DOD transient housing providers. Field site specialists can help any DOD entity that has excess furniture or appliances with a convenient and efficient property disposal solution. As an environmentally responsible agency, DLA strives to keep usable property from entering the waste stream through military reuse, federal transfer, or donation to state governments, qualifying non-profits, and international humanitarian assistance agencies.
#### Sweigart v. Sweigart

05/17/2016

1 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 648
# DLA Distribution Operation Team’s Rozier honored at DLA 48th annual employee recognition ceremony

/ Published Jan. 8, 2016
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia,
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Morgans Foods, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: December 24, 2008
    /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. HignettSenior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary 17
# DLA Distribution more than doubles Veterans Affairs’ medical supply support    

/ Published March 8, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution continues their support to the Veterans Affairs Department, distributing approximately 12,000 pallets of supplies to VA healthcare facilities.

The VA program began as a partnership to ensure personal protective equipment for VA health care workers and has more than doubled in size. DLA Distribution is currently providing storage and distribution services for over 30,000 pallets of material with over 12,000 issues. The medical commodities include various types of testing kits, blood tubes, swabs, wipes, PPE such as gloves, masks, gowns and face shields and various sterilization supplies such as antiseptics and disinfectants. Shala Pulgar, a DLA Distribution Business Development Specialist, believes that the distribution of these supplies has been critical.

“The VA program is helping veterans locally and around the world by acquiring the necessary supplies needed for their 1,200 plus facilities,” Pulgar said. “DLA continues to provide flexible and agile support to the VA by providing storage and distribution services that adjust as the environment and VA’s requirements change.”

Since the start of the pandemic in January 2020, the VA storage grew to nine warehouses. Through the initial agreement, DLA Distribution received, stored and distributed equipment to free the VA’s limited storage, saving millions of dollars in storage costs. By leveraging DLA Distribution’s core competency of storage and distribution, the VA materials have been consolidated into three DLA warehouses with no disruption to veteran care at VA hospitals and facilities.

The three different warehouses that are storing VA supplies are the East Coast contracted warehouse in Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, and DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California.

The Chambersburg warehouse is currently storing over 26,000 pallets of medical commodities, totaling approximately $120 million. The DDSP warehouse is currently storing over 550 pallets and DDJC is storing more than 3,100 pallets.

**Relevant news**:2021:  DLA Distribution increases Veterans Affairs support2020: DLA stores, distributes PPE for VA facilities ahead of potential virus spread in fall
2008-1974.

#### State v. Stepp.

Butler App. No. CA200705117, 2008-Ohio-4305. On motion for order or relief. Motion denied.
#### Maldonado, Matter of, v Howard

3d Dept: 148 AD3d 1501

denied
No. 09-11525.

#### John C. Duvall, Petitioner v. George Lombardi, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 886, 131 S. Ct. 214,

178 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6771.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
#### People v Morse

2d Dept: 144 AD3d 710 (Dutchess)

denied 3/14/17 (Fahey, J.)
Exhibit
      32.1








**The
      following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer of Clark, Inc. on the basis of such officers’
knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002.**





**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Clark, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on May 3, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Tom Wamberg, Chairman of the Board
      and Chief Executive Officer and I, Jeffrey W. Lemajeur, Chief Financial Officer,
      of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











/s/
      Tom Wamberg


Name:  Tom
      Wamberg


Title:
      Chairman of the Board


and
      Chief
      Executive Officer


Date:
      May
      3, 2006











/s/
      Jeffrey W. Lemajeur


Name:  Jeffrey
      W. Lemajeur


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer


Date:
      May
      3, 2006




















*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.*
2017-0616.

#### Portee v. Cleveland Clinic Found.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104693, 2017-Ohio-1053. On motion for admission pro hae vice of Matthew Schiller. Motion granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days.
### SERVED: JUNE 13, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF BELTMAKERS, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0049 

## HEARING NOTICE 

# zen Jtm 1 l A g: 

### 3 2

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered · on September30, October 1, through noon on October2, 2013, inclusive, in the U.S. Department ofLaborCourtroom, Suite 5150, the Glenn M. Anderson Federal Building, 501 West Ocean Boulevard,LongBeach, CA. 90802. Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. Settled cases will not be removed from the docket untiltheJudge receives the properpleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY FederalAviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel Michael L. Dworkin and Associates 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94104 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 Lisa J. Toscano, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Western-Pacific Region Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7110 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0049 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 **STATEMENT
OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**
 
 
 Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, John L.
Petersen, chief accounting officer of Axion Power International, Inc (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that:
 
 The
Company's Form 10-KSB Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
  /s/
Peter Roston
  Peter
Roston, Chief Financial Officer
 Dated:
March 30, 2005
No. 10-6562.

#### Jose Luis Cruz-Velez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 991, 131 S. Ct. 438,

178 L. Ed. 2d 340,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8284.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 415.
1

The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3128

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Richard Durnal, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: July 1, 2005

Filed: July 7, 2005

___________

Before BYE, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Richard Durnal (Durnal) appeals the judgment the district court1

 entered after

he pled guilty to conspiring to manufacture and distribute more than 500 grams of a

methamphetamine mixture, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. His counsel has moved

to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

arguing the court erred in enhancing Durnal’s sentence based on the uncharged fact

he possessed a weapon in connection with the drug conspiracy. Durnal has filed a pro
-2-

se supplemental brief arguing his attorney coerced him into pleading guilty and did

not properly defend him; and he seeks appointment of new counsel.

Counsel’s argument fails. The firearm enhancement was based solely on facts

to which Durnal stipulated, resulting in no Sixth Amendment violation. The district

court applied the Guidelines as advisory, rather than as mandatory, and the record

reflects the district court considered the factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We conclude

the sentence was not unreasonable. See United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738, 756,

764-67 (2005).

The pro se arguments also fail. During thorough questioning at the change-ofplea hearing, Durnal admitted the factual basis for his offense and affirmed he was

pleading guilty voluntarily. See United States v. Martinez-Cruz, 186 F.3d 1102, 1104

(8th Cir. 1999) (to be constitutionally valid, guilty plea must be knowing, voluntary,

and intelligent; because guilty plea constitutes waiver of various constitutional rights,

it must be made with sufficient awareness of relevant circumstances and likely

consequences); Nguyen v. United States, 114 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir. 1997)

(defendant’s representations during plea-taking carry strong presumption of verity).

Any ineffective-assistance claim should be deferred to proceedings under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 in which an appropriate record may be developed. See United States v.

Hughes, 330 F.3d 1068, 1069 (8th Cir. 2003). 

Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw, we deny Durnal’s motion for appointment of new counsel, and

we affirm the judgment.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2376 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2376

 To provide for the appointment of 1 additional Federal district judge 
     for the eastern district of Wisconsin, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 10 (legislative day, August 8), 1994

   Mr. Kohl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the appointment of 1 additional Federal district judge 
     for the eastern district of Wisconsin, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT 
              OF WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the 
eastern district of Wisconsin.
    (b) Tables.--In order that the table contained in section 133 of 
title 28, United States Code, shall reflect the change in the total 
number of permanent district judgeships authorized under subsection 
(a), such table is amended by amending the item relating to Wisconsin 
to read as follows:

``Wisconsin:
    ``Eastern........................................                 5
    ``Western........................................              2''.
    (c) Holding of Court.--The chief judge of the eastern district of 
Wisconsin shall designate 1 judge who shall hold court for such 
district in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2014421EN.01006402.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/64

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 31 March 2014 — CK v Commission

(Case F-3/13) (1)

1

2014/C 421/95

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 4.5.2013, p. 31.

1

---
No. 10-6068.

#### Jose Luis Valencia, Petitioner v. Nevada (two judgments).

562 U.S. 1008, 131 S. Ct. 514,

178 L. Ed. 2d 380,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8631.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.

Same case below, 126 Nev. 764 (both judgments).