alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2588 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2588

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
  conduct a study on the effects of oxybenzone and octinoxate on the 
         environment and public health, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2019

 Ms. Gabbard (for herself and Mr. Ryan) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
  addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
  conduct a study on the effects of oxybenzone and octinoxate on the 
         environment and public health, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oxybenzone and Octinoxate Impact 
Study Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF OXYBENZONE AND OCTINOXATE ON THE 
              ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH.

    (a) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Administrator of the Environmental 
        Protection Agency (referred to in this section as the 
        ``Administrator'') shall conduct a study on the impact of 
        oxybenzone and octinoxate on--
                    (A) the environment, including lethal and sublethal 
                impacts on aquatic ecosystems; and
                    (B) public health.
            (2) Inclusion.--The study under paragraph (1) shall include 
        analysis, documentation, and determinations on the impact of 
        oxybenzone and octinoxate on the protection and propagation 
        of--
                    (A) coral reefs; and
                    (B) marine life.
            (3) Consultation.--In conducting the study under paragraph 
        (1), the Administrator shall consult with--
                    (A) marine biology research centers located in the 
                United States on the shores of large bodies of water; 
                and
                    (B) the Director of the Centers for Disease Control 
                and Prevention.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to Congress and make 
publicly available on the website of the Environmental Protection 
Agency a report that describes the results of the study conducted under 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2013260EN.01001902.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/19

---

Request for an opinion submitted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU

(Opinion 2/13)

2013/C 260/32

Language of the case: all the official languages

Applicant

Applicant

European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer, L. Romero Requena, C. Ladenburger and B. Smulders, Agents)

Question submitted to the Court

Question submitted to the Court

Is the Draft Agreement on the Accession of the European Union to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms compatible with the Treaties?

---
#### Tauscher Cronacher PE PC, Matter of (Commissioner of Labor)

3d Dept: 148 AD3d 1491

denied
#### People v Brooks (Tracy)

4th Dept: 139 AD3d 1396 (Ontario)

denied 8/11/16 (Rivera, J.)
No. 10-5421.

#### Linda Morgan, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 921, 131 S. Ct. 294,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7120.

178 L. Ed. 2d 193,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1


         THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION IS PROVIDED BY THE UNDERSIGNED CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CLARK, INC. ON THE BASIS OF
SUCH OFFICERS' KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clark, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Tom
Wamberg, President and Chief Executive Officer and I, Jeffrey W. Lemajeur, Chief
Financial Officer, of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                                  /s/ Tom Wamberg
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name:   Tom Wamberg
                                                  Title:  President and
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                  Date:   November 2, 2004



                                                  /s/ Jeffrey W. Lemajeur
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name:  Jeffrey W. Lemajeur
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                                  Date:  November 2, 2004







         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/    DAVID J. NOBLEDavid J. NobleChairman/DirectorAnd Principal Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2004Date
ATA-10-271-E May 28, 2010

Exemption No. 4633M Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-12189

Lieutenant Colonel Timothy M. Kersey Chief, Flight Standards Division Department of the Air Force 6500 South MacArthur (AJW31AF) Oklahoma City, OK 73169

Dear Lt. Col. Kersey:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 4633, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 5, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of the Department of the Air Force (USAF) for an extension of Exemption No. 4633, as amended. That exemption from § 91.215(b) and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows the USAF to conduct certain military training flight operations in designated airspace over 10,000 feet mean sea level without being required to operate the aircraft transponders.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to USAF.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 4633, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40109, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 4633, as amended, to September 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 4633, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 4633.

Sincerely,

/s/

Edith Parish Manager, Airspace and Rules Group
# DLA Troop Support hosts AbilityOne expo

/ Published Nov. 6, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support hosted a virtual National Disability Employment Awareness Expo and AbilityOne Day Oct. 28 in Philadelphia. 

Members of DLA Troop Support, Aviation, and Land and Maritime joined with representatives from the National Industries for the Blind, SourceAmerica and AbilityOne to recognize contributions the disabled community have made to their organizations.

The AbilityOne program provides employment opportunities for people who are blind or have significant disabilities in the manufacturing and delivery of products and services to the federal government. 

In fiscal 2020, DLA Troop support procured nearly $325 million worth of goods and services through the program, a fact that executive director William Kenny said he was glad for.

“I am proud to say DLA is a strong supporter of organizations providing opportunities for persons with disabilities,” he said. “Today’s event helps bring awareness to those organizations as well as the products and services provided to our warfighters by companies who employ the blind and Americans with disabilities.”

DLA Aviation acquisition executive Cathy Contreras echoed Kenny’s sentiment. 

“Partnering with AbilityOne is a win-win situation for everyone involved,” she said. “It helps us serve as good stewards of tax payer money, and it provides employment opportunities for those eager to demonstrate their capabilities.”

The keynote speaker for the event was Curtis Harmon, a former Canadian Football League and the National Football League player who overcame disability and found success. 

Harmon was born with a birth defect that stopped his left arm growing from the elbow down. Despite what some would consider a major limitation, he was able to excel on the football field as well as in the business world. 

Harmon said hard work and confidence is what gave him the ability to succeed.

“It’s ok to be different or look different,” he said. “A lot of times, people will judge you on the way you look or act. They will put limitations on you, and that ok. You have to not put limitations on yourself. You have to prove them wrong. You have to figure out what you want to do, how to do it, how you can do it, and then it becomes a process. And then it’s just passion and determination.”

This year’s expo marked the 30th anniversary of the American’s with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including jobs, schools, transportation, and all public and private places that are open to the general public.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maurice Hall, Also Known as Bernard Robinson, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 833]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 3, 2003 *(People v Hall,*302 AD2d 406 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 6, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see *Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Friedmann and Rivera, JJ., concur.
# February employees of the month rise to meet production challenges for A-10 aircraft

/ Published April 19, 2022
Richmond, Va., 
DeAnne Allshouse and Theresa McKinzie, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation customer specialists were selected as Employees of the Month for February. Allshouse won the general schedule 1-9 category and McKinzie took the award in the GS 10-13 category.

When increasing global aggressions threatened to slow down work for the Air Force’s A-10 fleet serviced at the Air Force’s air logistics complex in Ogden, Utah, McKinzie stepped up to exceed expectations. McKinzie worked long shifts to ensure on-time completion of an ANDON  organic manufacture project for the A-10 Thunderbolt II aircraft program depot maintenance line.

McKinzie’s nominator, Douglas Baker, chief of the Material Management Branch in the Customer Operations Directorate, DLA Aviation at Ogden said McKinzie’s dedication helped prevent future production line shutdowns in back shops and the A-10 PDM line.

“Theresa was the driving force behind one of the most successful depot-level projects to-date in fiscal 2022,” Baker said. “She led a team of customer support specialists through processing of 15 OM retail buys in record time. Her outstanding efforts led to 15 bridge contracts being awarded to prevent gaps in fiscal year 2022-2023 vendor deliveries.”

McKinzie also created a prototype tracker, which allowed her to track the gated processes hourly, submitted packages for approval to the Emergency Contracts Support Branch and ensured that $1.2 million in emergency retails buys were awarded within days.

“As the leader for this event, Theresa drove the DLA average processing time down from 50 to 9 days—an 82% improvement,” Baker said. “Moreover, her efforts allowed the [air logistics complex] to increase projected production of A-10 aircraft from 13 to 23.”

Customer Operation Directorate’s Priority Cell Section Chief David Jorgenson nominated DeAnne Allshouse, customer support specialist, for her contribution in resolving an A-10 depot-level work stoppages.

Allshouse expedited coworkers’ packages, ensuring all ANDON packages kept moving through the OM A-10 gate process. She also pulled data from numerous DLA and Air Force systems to update and provide metrics twice a day to senior leaders throughout the project.

“DeAnne processed one third of the 15 OM retail buy packages in record time, and her efforts contributed to $1.2 million in working capital funds being allocated to serve as 15 bridge contracts to avoid shutting down production lines,” Jorgenson said.

Jorgenson added that Allhouse’s efforts also helped the complex increase aircraft production while also providing opportunities to train her coworkers in alternative methods for obtaining immediate status updates, broadening her peers’ skill sets and enhancing overall team dynamics.
Order entered September 24 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00709
- CV No. 05
- 19
- 00711
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF I .S. , ET AL, CHILDREN IN THE INTEREST OF J.L. JR. , ET AL, CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 14
- 10695



### O RDER Janet Saavedra, Official Court Reporter for the 254th Judicial District Court, filed the reporter’s records in these cases. Accordingly, we VACATE our September 17, 2019 order that orders Ms. Saavedra to not sit as a court reporter.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Ashley Wysocki, Presiding Judge, 254th Judicial Court; Janet Saavedra, Official Court Reporter, 254th Judicial District Court; the Dallas County Auditor’s Office; and counsel for all parties.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Yo~ TltE eL~k tJF, 

~-or CR!MI/\l-kl i'TPPEI\Ls. DF'~ Atl£:>ntJ, 1X. 

tt F5DUT lH£ -eND or MltY J Sw/ A LE~-rsrtr)J~p.ECJWk 

Wtftc.H I INCWDC::Cl/ 1.. A MCJTictJ Fo~ MPotAJ7'M£tJI (J-F CoV!J5CL 

.D~IGL~LLY FtLEb IN 2,.q!l!: D(STJelc:r ~T, ~ALo PiAlTZJ, covN1'( 

T-E~ &N .DELEMBER JITI!.r 2eJ1ctfoXit!BfiA~); Z i 1Wo (z,) L£TJER6 

1D TtiE. ~.NAtv't.D ~~ ~K£D &><.~!BiTS 'B' ~t\NO'c j)' 

f tJe-t-ER. ·Rf.CBVE-o t\(kNOvJLEOb£M6NT 11\AT Wlff P.A(~e t/T+dJ 

g£8\1 RtC£1 veo gy YoVR or-t=tc£ M wrt-1-1 AmoN HAS E-EVJ 

114-K'b\.1 R~DiAf6 ·niE Mono.tJ < 

l1f£ ~1'1\11;; LODN6£L FtJR ~~/93Nb£~S tl\l ~n /V\E 1\-f..A-1 "'ou~ 

~'- MV5T eRb£R.. Tt:tt ~ot,~MENT ot=-COtJ,N.SfL FoR vv-R. tl DF 

'HABG\~ COt<-~s eJNJ JA'{ P.-AR,n L.U~ CAS£ ~ (SM~, s. lltc i ve s) 

I. AM UNJ\BL£ 1D G-B.,'f)M.N DOcuJvt£JJIS ID 5rJtPOIGT MY CUtftvt, . . 

wtt<a-\ (S IRIJE 1\tJb W66TA~tAL 1 EflNt? A \JlDL-ff1)D.!J OF i=DtJRTH 

·1\f\ttfNDMEJJT PRbtE.cnoAJS PRNtDE:D gy THE CoNSTITUTION. I 

OF 'TtiC lJNflcD STr\T£5 SILL OF Rl6t+T?:>, 

-yt-\f. ().$. oUFREMt ~T MA~ RULSD lTiAT /N.Dil9£1JT, 11\lCIYtcGKf\1£{) t>EFEN IYvJ\5 R£bl0Y~ CDU.Ns.t I- FoR wR l \ UF f+AEiA S. [()R?vt;. i 

TlieRE:FbR.E T to NVl WArtJT1D rRlX£'£:i) t.PRo st:,C>N A NEW 

-~ ~fVS. PR.o.:ffDiNG B"A5£.D 0-N NEW Ruu!J6S IWD 

LI\W' occut<\tJ~ A-fli:k. M'! C/Rt61!JAL 1\t-'(~_JCI\TirYN Fo~ 

WRcr OF ·NitC$19\5 ~FtJs ~ 
I i-11\.\1~- v.J{(fiTfAl MA.N'Y A~Jt'!.S AtJD L£G:'cAL A\p ORfft.JrZ1n8'JS . ~ 

MD 15££rJ UtJEiJcc£~srvL- OBI'At!J iAl6 R'-EP~9:NTATIDAJ OJJ PRo BD.\tl. 

1SA-si5 1 6o PftR. NDNG HAvE t1M ntf FRDF£SSit>t.J.-\L Ce;vR.l£6 y TD 

EVfN RE~Po,!Jt') 10 j/'JQVIR\f. 

IS TH~R£ A RECDRD I CAJJ ~A:\N Ff~lv\ Yo?)R ~P:t.C£ oF AUfiLitJGS 2.'( .Mt hH) THE. SfA11JS oF 1Tf£M. ALL Of? jV\1'{ 1\ffi.te:AllOJJ.S 

RJ\VC: B'EEJJ''DEtJt&b WtTHouT W-R tTTB\1 ~()'' Wt-TliVDT rvJ'f 6DR.\ 

01'=1- EKFt..t\t'-.lfiT\VJJ vJtt'(J·THAI J ;V\\6L-fT Cote.f<£·Cf PFCL"ri&L£10-s bR. 

~~S., . . . 

It~ 1tj[~ ltJf>l'Mct: i PALO PINto ~ 1'1- Ci\V5£'" 1472'2. -A, 1 

ffA\le A CL-f\-V\1\ THAT 1-\.M ALR.CAi)y St£N CA6ES ~~t-J£.D t .. ..J 

Yo~ CDt>R-T, o. S .. D\S\'R\(::r ~- M'.D lli£ StJi>R8V\-E CD~T FOR. 

\ QCN-nc.AL u~wM.s\1\l'JC£5~ 

..f CAJJ N'DT U~Df=R:S1AI'Jb Wttt .1 AM H:f\\ftNG. £t) MDe.L"t DJI-=p:rc.LJUY 

OBIT\\"-1 !NG Rf~; -t- SflvUS> 1\161 f5t. RE-Qu~t~?ti) w tuR.c: CtDVN6£L 

WrtfN Tt1t R\t.n.:r t:-l-ES CtJ-nrt 11+£· bl':fiTC :4J...Jf) fT5 fi-At\lf)LW~ Of' Mt, 

N~ C-lt1-.J :1 1\F~~ 0-N£ , 

#¢: 1 \~-.( 7 9, q (p(p -ofp 

DRl G J,--ll. r_ lrf?J--f t::+no.N
# Troop Support celebrates Navy’s 241st birthday

/ Published Oct. 13, 2016
PHILADELPHIA , 

The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support celebrated the Navy’s 241st birthday and the service’s tradition, pride and core values after a senior leader staff meeting Oct. 11. 

“We get to honor those who have served before us and at the same time, celebrate the future that comes from serving in the Navy and this great country,” said Navy Lt. Cdr. A.J. Luna, who works in the Construction and Equipment supply chain.

The official date for the Navy birthday is Oct. 13. Prior to the meeting, videos of the “CNO's 2016 Navy Birthday Message” and “U.S. Navy 241st Birthday video celebration!!” were played.

As part of the tradition in celebrating the Navy’s birthday, theoldest and youngest sailors at DLA Troop Support cut the birthday cake. The privilege was given to Navy Capt. Daniel Hodgson, Construction and Equipment director, and Lt. Dartanyon King, Subsistence contract specialist.

“To be a part of it (Navy birthday) means everything to me because my dad was also in the Navy. So just continuing the legacy of the Navy makes me excited,” said King.

According to the Naval History and Heritage Command, the Navy was formed after the Continental Congress, meeting in Philadelphia voted to send two armed vessels to tour and intercept transports carrying munitions to the British Army in America.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert J. Kunz, Appellant.

[53 NYS3d 788]

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (John L. DeMarco, J.), dated May 22, 2015. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 *et seq.).*Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court properly assessed 15 points under risk factor 11 for a history of drug or alcohol abuse inasmuch as “[t]he statements in the case summary and presentence report with respect to defendant’s substance abuse constitute reliable hearsay supporting the court’s assessment of points under th[at] risk factor” *(People v*
      *1697
      *Ramos,*41 AD3d 1250, 1250 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 809 [2007]; *see People v Jackson,*134 AD3d 1580, 1580 [2015]). The SORA guidelines justify the addition of 15 points under risk factor 11 “if an offender has a substance abuse history *or*was abusing drugs and or [sic] alcohol at the time of the offense” (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 15 [2006] [emphasis added]). Indeed, “[a]n offender need not be abusing alcohol or drugs at the time of the instant offense to receive points” for that risk factor *(id.; see People v Lewis,*50 AD3d 1567, 1568 [2008], *lv denied*11 NY3d 702 [2008]; *see generally People v Palmer,*20 NY3d 373, 377-378 [2013]).

Here, according to the presentence report, defendant “started using marihuana as a teenager,” and “he used this substance regularly” *(see People v Merkley,*125 AD3d 1479, 1479 [2015]; *People v Carswell,*8 AD3d 1073, 1073 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 607 [2004]). The extent and regularity of defendant’s marihuana use was bolstered by a previous diagnosis of “Cannabis Abuse,” which was also noted in the presentence report. Moreover, “defendant was required to attend drug and alcohol treatment while incarcerated, thus further supporting the court’s assessment of points for a history of drug or alcohol abuse” *(People v Mundo,*98 AD3d 1292, 1293 [2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 855 [2013]; *see People v Perez,*138 AD3d 1081, 1081 [2016], *lv denied*27 NY3d 913 [2016]). Defendant also admitted that he “last used marihuana in October of 2002,” which was proximate in time to his arrest for the underlying offense *(see Lewis,*50 AD3d at 1568). Although defendant completed an Alcohol and Substance Abuse Treatment Program, a “ ‘recent history of abstinence while incarcerated is not necessarily predictive of his behavior when no longer under such supervision’ ” *(People v Vangorder,*72 AD3d 1614, 1614 [2010]; *see Jackson,*134 AD3d at 1580-1581; *People v Urbanski,*74 AD3d 1882, 1883 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 707 [2010]).

Present—Carni, J.P., Lindley, DeJoseph, Curran and Troutman, JJ.