alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-6238.

#### Henry Clifford Johnson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 972, 131 S. Ct. 486,

178 L. Ed. 2d 307,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7962.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# PaCE Spotlight: Thomas Martorana 

/ Published Aug. 2, 2023
BATTLE CREEK, Mich. , 
Thomas Martorana is a current member of Pathways to Career Excellence Program Group 44, which began in 2022. For his second year in the PaCE Program, he will be placed at the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services site at Fort Liberty, North Carolina.

                DLA Disposition Services PaCEr Thomas Martorana                            Thomas Martorana is a current member of Pathways to Career Excellence Program Group 44, which began in 2022.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Jace ArmstrongVIRIN: 230718-D-D0441-200**In your own words, how would you describe the PaCE program, and what can you gain from it?**

The PaCE Program is a career building block to learn different skills. You receive on-the-job training at the headquarters’ location in Battle Creek, Michigan, and at the field sites. I have gained valuable experience and skills like effective briefing that I can use during my DLA career.

**Why did you first apply to the PaCE Program?**

I applied to the PaCE Program because I felt it was the next step for me after just earning my bachelor’s degree in environmental management.

**What is your DLA experience?**

I’ve worked for DLA for three years. I started my DLA career as a GS-5 material examiner tech. When I got accepted to the PaCE Program, I was Wage Grade-6, material identifier and examiner and forklift driver.

**What have been your favorite parts of the PaCE Program?**

Visiting other field sites and shadowing the DLA Disposition Services Director Mike Cannon, meeting the different people at Headquarters and making new friends.

**Do you have a favorite memory from your time in the program?**

Traveling with my fellow PaCERs to different field sites and hanging out with them.

**If there was one thing that could’ve been different for you in the PaCE program, what would it be?**

Avoiding Michigan’s winter. LOL! No, I have enjoyed all of it.

**What would you say is the most important quality to succeed in the PaCE Program?**

Utilize all the resources that are available for you, practice time management and be a team player. You also need to have a willingness to learn new skills.

**What your plans for your future in the agency?**

I would like work in the environmental field - hopefully as a GS-13 or 14.

----

*Editorial Note: The Pathways to Career Excellence Program for DLA Disposition Services is a two-year program that takes PaCERs through all of Disposition Services and its processes to learn as much as possible about the directorate. The first year takes place at DLA Disposition Services Headquarters in Battle Creek, Michigan, and the second year either takes place in Battle Creek for Contracting PaCERs or at an assigned field site for Property Disposal PaCERs. PaCERs begin as general schedule 7s, move to GS-9s at the end of their first year, and graduate the program as GS-11s. There are multiple pathways to becoming a PaCER, including being hired internally, as a recent graduate, or from military service.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joel Harris, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 395]

Mugglin, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Main, Jr., J.), rendered July 9, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of third-degree criminal sale of a controlled substance in satisfaction of a nine-count indictment. In exchange, it was agreed that he would be sentenced to a prison term of 21⁄2 to 71⁄2years. Defendant executed both a written waiver of his right to appeal and a *Parker*admonishment, wherein he acknowledged that his participation in any illegal conduct during the period of time between the plea hearing and the sentencing hearing would free County Court to impose any legal sentence, including the maximum sentence permitted by law *(see People v Parker,*57 NY2d 136, 141 [1982]). When defendant perpetrated the crime of bail jumping by failing to appear at his scheduled sentencing hearing, County Court sentenced him in absentia to an enhanced prison term of 5 to 15 years, a legal sentence *(see*Penal Law § 70.00 [2] [b]; [3] [b]).

Defendant appeals the imposition of an enhanced sentence on the ground that County Court neglected to inform him at the plea hearing of the maximum sentence which could be imposed in the event that he failed to appear at the sentencing hearing. *982County Court advised defendant that if he failed to appear for sentencing, he “could be sentenced to any legal sentence upon conviction for a Class B felony, which is substantially greater exposure than *71⁄2*years.” Defendant stated that he understood and defense counsel advised the court that he had discussed with defendant what that exposure would be, a fact confirmed by defendant’s written waiver of appeal. As a result, not only is defendant’s argument belied by the record, but the issue raised does not challenge the legality of the sentence and is, therefore, precluded by his waiver *(see People v Caines,*268 AD2d 790, 791 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 833 [2000]).

As defendant was adequately advised concerning the maximum sentence that could be imposed, we decline to review his claim that his sentence was harsh and excessive *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733 [1998]; *People v Fewell [Sawyer],*284 AD2d 563 [2001], *lvs denied*97 NY2d 681, 687 [2001]). Moreover, as defendant’s claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel does not allege that the inadequacy of counsel affected the voluntary nature of his plea *(see People v Camp,*302 AD2d 629, 630 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 593 [2003]), this claim is also precluded by his waiver. The remaining issues raised by defendant have been examined and found to be without merit.

Crew III, J.P., Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
[Cite as State ex rel. McCuller v. Calabrese , 2013-Ohio-590.] 

# Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98828



## STATE OF OHIO EX REL, CHARLES D. McCULLER

RELATOR

vs.



## JUDGE DEENA R. CALABRESE

RESPONDENT



### JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED

Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 458559

Order No. 462221

RELEASED DATE: February 15, 2013 -i-FOR RELATOR

Charles D. McCuller, Pro Se Inmate #482-821 Grafton Correctional Inst. 2500 S. Avon Beldon Road Grafton, Ohio 44044

FOR RESPONDENTS

Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

By: James E. Moss Assistant county Prosecutor 9 th Floor, Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.:

{¶1} Charles D. McCuller, the relator, has filed a complaint for a writ of

procedendo. McCuller seeks an order from this court which requires Judge Deena R.

Calabrese, the respondent, to render rulings with regard to three “motion[s] to vacate void

sentence” that are pending in State v. McCuller , Cuyahoga C.P. Case Nos. CR-79-48254,

CR-79-48919, and CR-79-52011. McCuller’s request for a writ of procedendo is moot.

{¶2} Attached to Judge Calabrese’s motion for summary judgment are three

judgment entries, each journalized on September 11, 2012, that demonstrate rulings have

been rendered with regard to each pending motion to vacate void sentence. Thus, Judge

Calabrese has proceeded to judgment and McCuller’s request for a writ of procedendo is

moot. State ex rel. Fontanella v. Kantos , 117 Ohio St.3d 514, 2008-Ohio-1431, 885

N.E.2d 220; State ex rel. Howard v. Doneghy , 102 Ohio St.3d 355, 2004-Ohio-3207, 810

N.E.2d 958, ¶ 6, quoting State ex rel. Kreps v. Christiansen (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 313,

318, 725 N.E.2d 663.

{¶3} Accordingly, we grant Judge Calabrese’s motion for summary judgment.

McCuller to pay costs. Cost ordered waived. The court directs the clerk of court to serve

all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by

Civ.R. 58(B).{¶4} Writ denied.

PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, PRESIDING JUDGE

MELODY J. STEWART, A.J., and EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 16, 2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Date: November 16, 2009/s/ Michael R. Feinsod
Michael R. Feinsod
Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33102-33103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16095]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a 
meeting on July 7, 1998, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(2) and (6) to discuss

[[Page 33103]]

organizational and personnel matters that relate solely to internal 
personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and information the release of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: Tuesday, 
July 7, 1998--12:15 p.m.--1:30 p.m.
    The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related 
matters. It may also discuss the qualifications of candidates for 
appointment to the ACRS. The purpose of this meeting is to gather 
information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and to formulate 
proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the 
full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff person named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the 
scheduling of sessions open to the public, whether the meeting has been 
canceled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on requests for the 
opportunity to present oral statements, and the time allotted therefor 
can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. John 
T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415-7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual one or two working days prior to the meeting to 
be advised of any changes in schedule, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-16095 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 209

To provide for full statutory wage adjustments for prevailing rate employees,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. PELL (for himself and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To provide for full statutory wage adjustments for prevailing

rate employees, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevailing Wage Rate

5 Adjustment Reform Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. WAGE RATES.

7 Without regard to any other provision of law limiting

8 the amounts payable—

9 (1) to a prevailing rate employee defined under

10 section 5342(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code;
2

•S 209 IS

1 (2) to an employee covered by section 5348 of

2 such title; or

3 (3) to any other employee subject to section

4 616 of the Treasury, Postal Service, and General

5 Government Appropriations Act, 1993, Public Law

6 102–393; 106 Stat. 1768;

7 such employees shall be paid, beginning on the effective

8 date of each annual wage survey adjustment in the region

9 after the date of the enactment of this Act, wages as deter10 mined and established in accordance with the provisions

11 of subchapter IV of chapter 53, title 5, United States

12 Code.

Æ
# C_2013274EN.01000501.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Krakowie (Poland) lodged on 27 June 2013 — Drukarnia Multipress sp. z o. o. v Minister for Finance

(Case C-357/13)

2013/C 274/09

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Krakowie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Drukarnia Multipress sp. z o. o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Minister for Finance

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Should Article 2(1)(b) and (c) of Council Directive 2008/7/EC of 12 February 2008 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (1) (OJ L 46, 21.2.2008, p. 11) be interpreted to mean that a limited joint-stock partnership should be regarded as a capital company within the meaning of those provisions if it follows from the legal nature of that partnership that only part of its capital and partners are able to meet the requirements set out in Article 2(1)(b) and (c) of the Directive? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Should Article 2(1)(b) and (c) of Council Directive 2008/7/EC of 12 February 2008 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (1) (OJ L 46, 21.2.2008, p. 11) be interpreted to mean that a limited joint-stock partnership should be regarded as a capital company within the meaning of those provisions if it follows from the legal nature of that partnership that only part of its capital and partners are able to meet the requirements set out in Article 2(1)(b) and (c) of the Directive?

1

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the negative, should Article 9 of Council Directive 2008/7/EC of 12 February 2008 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (OJ L 46, 21.2.2008, p. 11), which allows a Member State to choose not to recognise the entities referred to in Article 2(2) of the Directive as capital companies, be interpreted to mean that the said Member State is also free to choose whether or not to levy capital duty on such entities? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the negative, should Article 9 of Council Directive 2008/7/EC of 12 February 2008 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (OJ L 46, 21.2.2008, p. 11), which allows a Member State to choose not to recognise the entities referred to in Article 2(2) of the Directive as capital companies, be interpreted to mean that the said Member State is also free to choose whether or not to levy capital duty on such entities?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 46, p. 11.

1

---
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2466

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic

Petroleum Reserve more effectively, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. JOHNSTON (for himself and Mr. WALLOP) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Committee discharged

A BILL

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic Petroleum Reserve more effectively,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That this Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Policy and

4 Conservation Act Amendments Act of 1994’’.

5 SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE.

6 This title may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Policy and

7 Conservation Act Amendments of 1994’’.
2

S 2466 CDS

1 SEC. 102. TITLE I AMENDMENTS.

2 Part D of title I of the Energy Policy and Conserva3 tion Act is amended in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251), by

4 striking ‘‘September 30, 1994’’ each time it appears and

5 inserting ‘‘June 30, 1996’’.

6 SEC. 103. TITLE II AMENDMENTS.

7 Part D of title II of the Energy Policy and Conserva8 tion Act is amended in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285), by

9 striking ‘‘September 30, 1994’’ each time it appears and

10 inserting ‘‘June 30, 1996’’.

Æ
EX-10.1








Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT P00036 & P00042




BETWEEN




THE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES




AND




WellCare Health Plan, Inc.




Pursuant to the provision of Sections 1851 through 1859 of the Social Security Act, the
contract between the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and WellCare
Health Care, Inc., is hereby amended as follows:




Article II: Coordinated Care Plan




The service area for H1032 is expanded to include Brevard and Broward Counties in the State
of Florida. The service area for D1032 (discount drug card program) is also expanded
accordingly.




This amendment will be in force effective January 1, 2005.



	 	 	 
	   12/1/04   

	 	   /s/ Rose Crum-Johnson   
	 

	 	 
	DATE

	 	Rose Crum-Johnson

Regional Administrator

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
	 
	 	 
	   Nov 30, 2004

	 	_/s/ Todd S. Farha   
	 

	 	 
	DATE

	 	Todd S. Farha

Chief Executive Officer

WellCare Health Plans, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-010-07-1020-00-241A]


Northwest Colorado Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting and Televideo Conference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The next meeting of the Northwest Colorado Resource Advisory 
Council will be held on Friday, February 20, 1998, in Grand Junction, 
Colorado, following a televideo broadcast from the BLM National 
Training Center in Phoenix, Arizona.

DATES: Friday, February 20, 1998.

ADDRESSES: For further information, contact Joann Graham, Bureau of 
Land Management (BLM), Grand Junction District Office, 2815 H Road, 
Grand Junction, Colorado 81506; Telephone (970) 244-3037.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will follow a BLM National 
Resource Advisory Council televideo broadcast. The broadcast will air 
from 9:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon in the BLM Grand Junction District Office, 
2850 H Road, Grand Junction, Colorado. The Northwest RAC meeting will 
be from 12:45 p.m. to 4:45 p.m. Agenda items include an update of the 
roadless inventory review and subcommittee reports on fire, land 
exchanges, and recreation.
    The televideo conference and the resource advisory council meeting 
are open to the public. Interested persons may make oral statements at 
the meetings or submit written statements following the meeting. Per-
person time limits for oral statements may be set to allow all 
interested persons an opportunity to speak.
    Summary minutes of council meetings are maintained in both the 
Grand Junction and Craig District Offices. They are available for 
public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within 
thirty (30) days following the meeting.

    Dated: January 13, 1998.
Mark T. Morse,
District Manager, Craig and Grand Junction Districts.
[FR Doc. 98-1630 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
No. 10-5671.

#### Lin Guang, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 955, 131 S. Ct. 334,

178 L. Ed. 2d 254,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7774.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 121.
---

CONSENT OF AUTHORP. Kramers, PrEng., FSAIMM
Deloitte Mining Advisory ServicesDeloitte Consulting Pty LtdBuilding
4, Deloitte PlaceThe Woodlands, Woodlands Drive, Woodmead,
SandtonJohannesburg, South Africa

US Securities and Exchange Commission

I, P. Kramers, PrEng., FSAIMM, certify that I have read the
written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that
there are any misrepresentations in the information provided to the Company by
Deloitte Mining Advisory Services in the written disclosure in the Form 20F of
Anooraq Resources Corporation.

I do hereby consent to the filing with the regulatory
authorities.

Dated this 1stday of July, 2009.

|/signed/ P.
      Kramers        
|---------------------------------
|                                 
|P. Kramers, PrEng., FSAIMM       
|Deloitte Mining Advisory Services

---
---

---

# Exhibit 15.5

CONSENT

We hereby consent to the reference to
our valuation of Interest rate swap transaction (IRS) of Plaza Centers N.V. in
respect of Series B debentures as of December 31,2008 in this Annual Report on Form 20-F
of Elbit Imaging Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2008 and to the incorporation by
reference of this Annual Report in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration
No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging
Ltd.

This consent is not to be construed
as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to
be filed with the Annual Report under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.

|/s/
 Financial Immunities Ltd.
|--------------------------------------------



Rehovot, Israel 
June 25, 2009



---

---
No. 10-5495.

#### Dung A. Nguyen, aka Johnny Tran, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 925, 131 S. Ct. 309,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7382.

178 L. Ed. 2d 201,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 596 F.3d 913.
# IH employees get the bigger picture during DLA Distribution visit

/ Published Sept. 25, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania,