alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-210.

#### Yvonne R. Kovacevich, et vir, Petitioners v. United States.

562 U.S. 897, 131 S. Ct. 353,

178 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6207.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 345 Fed. Appx. 581.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael E. Kalogris, Chief Executive Officer of SunCom Wireless, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SunCom Wireless, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III. E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293] for the registrant and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [omitted in accordance with Section III. E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293]; 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors: 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 13, 2006
# Employee Working Group holds Warrior Wednesday fun walk/run

/ Published March 17, 2016
RICHMOND, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia celebrated the March Warrior Wednesday with a Spirit of Spring Fun Walk/Run.

Almost 100 employees showed their spirit by wearing red, white and blue and walked or ran between two to four miles while enjoying an hour of physical fitness on a hot spring day.

“It was a good walk,” said Trina Vanstory, who is a regular participant in the agency’s Fitness Program and walked with several of her co-workers.   Employees may learn more about the agency’s Fitness and Wellness Program by reading through the DLA Instruction as well as the FAQ sheet developed for the program.

Marichell Scott helped to organize the event and said the turnout was far better than she expected. Scott works in DLA Aviation Supplier Operations as a contract specialist and is the special events chairperson for the Employee Working Group, which sponsors Warrior Wednesday. 

“To my surprise we were asked, when will we do this again?” she said. “So it looks like another walk/run will be sometime this fall.  I would like to thank all those who came out to support the event. It could not have been successful without you. Because of you, it makes me want to do more.”

Warrior Wednesday, an initiative to build esprit de corps among DLA Aviation employees, aligns with and supports DLA’s Strategic Plan, Goal Area 1: Warfighter First. 

This monthly event allows the workforce to celebrate how their individual efforts at DLA contribute and positively impact the mission, and the safety and success of the soldiers, airmen, sailors, Marines and Coast Guardsmen in service to America across all DLA Aviation’s geographic locations. As a symbol of each employee’s solidarity to the program, employees are asked to wear red, white and blue clothing.
No. 10-5424.

#### Isaiah J. Gregory, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 921, 131 S. Ct. 295,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7368.

178 L. Ed. 2d 193,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 591 F.3d 964.
# DLA director notes value of partnerships for clothing, textiles

/ Published April 21, 2016
Washington, D.C.,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Unisource Worldwide, Inc. and subsidiaries
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. Such
information has been revised in accordance with the provisions of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 128.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      45,384,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              906,943,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                24,583,000
<INVENTORY>                                495,330,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,472,949,000
<PP&E>                                     434,762,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             188,336,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,558,832,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      805,532,000
<BONDS>                                    661,350,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 984,316,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,558,832,000
<SALES>                                  7,108,355,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         7,108,355,000
<CGS>                                    5,911,713,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            5,911,713,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         1,036,715,000<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            15,232,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          41,637,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            103,058,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                44,372,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         58,686,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                58,686,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
<FN>
<F1>(1) Represents selling, general, and administrative expenses, excluding
provision for losses on accounts receivable.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

HARRY MADERA, a.k.a. Boricua, a.k.a.

Seal J,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-50263

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00713-DSF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 25, 2014** 

Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

 

Harry Madera appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the

130-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to

distribute and possess with intent to distribute controlled substances, in violation of

FILED

JUN 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
21 U.S.C. § 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Madera’s

counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Madera the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Madera waived the right to appeal six specified issues related to his

sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to any sentencing

issue outside the scope of the appeal waiver. We therefore affirm as to those

issues. We dismiss the remainder of the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. 

See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

 

2 13-50263
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

James Cole Hanlon

, * From the County Court

of Eastland County,

Trial Court No. 1300341

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00234

- CR * September 15 , 201 6

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright

, C. J.

(P anel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and McCall, sitting

by assignment )

(Bailey, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
No. 10-5760.

#### James Besser, Petitioner v. James Walsh, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 955, 131 S. Ct. 342,

178 L. Ed. 2d 254,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7737.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 601 F.3d 163.
Exhibit 99.1



                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 Pursuant  to Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  the
undersigned,  as Chief Executive  Officer of Tumbleweed,  Inc. (The  "Company"),
does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

         1)       the  Company's  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                  ending March 23, 2003 (the "Report"),  fully complies with the
                  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or  15(d)  of the  Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       the  information  contained  in the  Company's  Report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Terrance A. Smith
                                                   ---------------------
                                                   Terrance A. Smith
                                                   President and Chief
                                                   Executive Officer
 Dated: May 7, 2003



 Pursuant  to Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  the
undersigned,  as Chief Financial  Officer of Tumbleweed,  Inc. (The  "Company"),
does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

         1)       the  Company's  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                  ending March 23, 2003 (the "Report"),  fully complies with the
                  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or  15(d)  of the  Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       the  information  contained  in the  Company's  Report  fairly
                  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.


                                                       /s/ Glennon F. Mattingly
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Glennon F. Mattingly
                                                       Vice President and
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
 Dated: May 7, 2003






<PAGE>
# Army logistician officer takes charge of DLA Troop Support Europe & Africa

/ Published June 7, 2024
KAISERSLAUTERN, Germany, 
The charge to deliver food, uniforms, medical items and more to ensure the combat readiness of America’s warfighters throughout Europe, Africa and the Middle East changed hands June 7.

Army Lt. Col. Eduardo Rivera assumed command of the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Europe & Africa from Army Lt. Col. Fermin Gonzales Jr. during a change of command ceremony in Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Army Brig. Gen. Landis C. Maddox, DLA Troop Support commander, officiated the outdoor ceremony in front of more than fifty guests and distinguished visitors at the DLA Quad on Kleber Kaserne.

“Gonzales has expertly led the DLA Troop Support Europe and Africa team stationed in eleven locations across six countries providing superior support to three combatant commands, US European Command, US Africa Command, and US Central Command,” Maddox said. “Fermin’s tenure as commander has left an impressive legacy, under his command the Warfighter was supported through the end of the COVID pandemic, and responses to global crisis in Ukraine, the Middle East and Africa.”

Gonzales gave credit to the military service members, DLA civilians and local national workforce of DLA Troop Support Europe & Africa.

“This team’s care, commitment and sense of duty drives them to above and beyond, it has been an honor over these past two years to serve with this dedicated team of professionals,” he said.

Gonzales will serve on the Logistics Information Management team as an Army logistics IT enterprise planner at the Pentagon in Washington DC.

Rivera takes command after completing a two-year tour in the National Capital Region with the Headquarters Department of the Army where he served as a Special Operations Divisions Logistics branch chief in the Strategic Operations directorate.   

“I am very excited to be part of the DLA Troop Support and Defense Logistics Agency family. I look forward to carrying on the tradition of outstanding support to the Warfighters as a Trusted Mission Partner, Rivera said, “Warfighter Always!”

DLA Troop Support Europe & Africa is a forward element of DLA Troop Support in Philadelphia and supports warfighters in the region through four supply chains: Subsistence, Clothing & Textiles, Medical and Construction & Equipment.
# DLA, AFRICOM extend partnership

/ Published March 15, 2016
Stuttgart, Germany, 
The Defense Logistics Agency and U.S. Africa Command in February signed a three-year agreement that outlines and extends DLA's support to the regional command.

“DLA has really stepped up by giving us a full team of subject matter experts that will make an immediate difference when we have to react rapidly to a situation on the continent. We couldn’t do it without DLA,” said Paul Brown, AFRICOM deputy director for logistics.

Brown said the most prominent example of DLA’s support to AFRICOM was during Operation United Assistance – the U.S. military’s response to the 2014 Ebola outbreak in western Africa. He said the operation was a “huge logistics lift” involving moving thousands of troops and medical equipment in a matter of weeks.

“DLA headquarters was a tremendous help during that operation as a result of having the team embedded here,” Brown said.

DLA’s presence on the AFRICOM staff has expanded since then. Though the relationship between DLA and geographic combatant commands is outlined in several Department of Defense directives, this agreement outlines specifics, like how many DLA employees will work at AFRICOM’s headquarters in Stuttgart and what their roles will be.

“The agreement formalizes why an outside organization comes into AFRICOM, what we provide them and what they give us,” Brown said.

Currently, the agreement calls for 11 full-time employees to serve side-by-side with their counterparts in the AFRICOM J4 Directorate for Logistics and the AFRICOM Office of the Surgeon General. Individually their responsibilities vary, but collectively DLA employees provide AFRICOM with a direct connection to the agency responsible for providing the food, fuel, water, and supplies that U.S. service members need to perform their mission.

The agreement also states DLA representatives will be integrated into AFRICOM’s planning processes. At AFRICOM, planners prepare for everything from annual exercises like Flintlock 2016 to crisis operations like Operation United Assistance. Planners consider how, when and where to sustain forces and who provides that sustainment. 

“Right now they’re embedded in all of our planning efforts and they are continuously communicating back to their headquarters,” Brown said. “DLA is already onboard, they’re already watching it, and they’re ready to respond.”

Leaders from AFRICOM and DLA will hold meetings semi-annually at a minimum to assess the agreement and make changes when necessary to better support AFRICOM’s mission.
#### Genova Burns LLC, Appellant, v New Yorkers for Bill Thompson, Defendant, and William C. Thompson, Jr., et al., Respondents.

[47 NYS3d 907]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry R. Ostrager, J.), entered November 16, 2015, which granted the individual defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s retainer agreement, which engaged plaintiff for representation in connection with a post-campaign audit, was executed by defendant James Ross solely in his representative capacity as treasurer of defendant New Yorkers for Bill Thompson and was not executed by defendant candidate at all. Nor was the personal liability of the individual defendants *457contemplated. Accordingly, the individual defendants are not personally liable under the agreement *(see Seaver v Ransom,*224 NY 233, 237 [1918]; *Salzman Sign Co. v Beck,*10 NY2d 63 [1961]; *Richmond Adv./Reinhold Assoc. v Del Guidice,*66 AD2d 701 [1st Dept 1978]).

Plaintiff has abandoned its claims for unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and account stated *(see Hardwick v Auriemma,*116 AD3d 465, 468 [1st Dept 2014], *lv denied*23 NY3d 908 [2014]).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Richter, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Webber and Kahn, JJ.
# DLA Distribution Commander delivers SAAPM message

/ Published April 4, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
The Department of Defense recognizes April as Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month, a time to focus the attention to the prevalence of sexual misconduct within our communities. This month-long period brings awareness of the impact sexual assault has on our workforce. The theme for SAAPM 2023 is “Step Forward. Prevent. Report. Advocate.” This is a call to action encouraging DLA Distribution personnel at all levels to use their personal strength to bolster prevention, increase reporting, and promote advocacy to ensure a safer environment for all.Since the establishment of the DLA Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program in 2016, we have made significant strides to promote awareness, and institute robust prevention initiatives to cultivate an organizational culture where sexual assault is never tolerated. Acts of sexual violence disrupts the lives and performance of all service members, civilian employees and endangers our ability to support the warfighter.A strong primary prevention strategy is key to eliminating sexual violence. There is power in numbers, so let us continue to unite to eliminate sexual assault. We are all leaders so we must work together to educate our DLA Distribution community about sexual assault prevention and speak out against harmful attitudes and actions.I, along with Mr. Knight, thank you and your families for all you do to support the organization, our Warfighters, and our great Nation.

                DLA leadership has made prevention of and response to sexual assault a top priority.                            SAAPM 2017                            DLA leadership has made prevention of and response to sexual assault a top priority.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Paul CrankVIRIN: 170410-D-YE683-001
#### In the Matter of Harry T., Respondent, v Lana K., Appellant.

[65 NYS3d 442]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Adetokunbo Fasanya, J.), entered on or about April 21, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied respondent mother’s affirmative defense of alienation after excluding the testimony and written report of a neutral forensic psychologist appointed during prior custody proceedings in Queens Family Court insofar as they related to that proceeding, and granted the father’s support petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In her brief and pre-argument statement on appeal, respondent states that she appeals from the trial court’s failure to admit into evidence the forensic report prepared in connection with an earlier custody proceeding between the parties. However, since respondent never offered it into evidence at trial, this is not a proper basis for her appeal. To the extent that respondent appeals from the trial court’s refusal to permit the forensic to testify as to his conclusions contained in the *512report, the trial court properly sustained objections to such testimony, given respondent’s attorney’s failure to make an offer of proof as to how those conclusions, contained in a report completed more than two years before trial and prior to the parties’ stipulation changing primary physical custody from respondent to petitioner, would be relevant in the current child support proceeding. A suspension of respondent’s child support obligation was not warranted, since she failed to show “deliberate frustration of and active interference with [her] visitation rights” *(Rodman v Friedman,*112 AD3d 537, 537 [1st Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Kahn, Gesmer, Kern and Moulton, JJ.
No. 09-11505.

#### Jermaine S. Doss, Petitioner v. Virginia.

562 U.S. 884, 131 S. Ct. 211,

178 L. Ed. 2d 127,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6618.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
No. 10-5728.

#### Jeffery Jon Mills, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 1006, 131 S. Ct. 507,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8482.

178 L. Ed. 2d 376,

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 48 Cal. 4th 158, 106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 153, 226 P.3d 276.