alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-6434.

#### Rajinder Singh Johal, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 988, 131 S. Ct. 431,

178 L. Ed. 2d 335,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8205.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 670.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-234-002]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Tariff Compliance

June 12, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 9, 1998, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective 
date of June 15, 1998:

Sub. Third Revised Sheet No. 361A

    CNG respectfully requests a waiver of Section 154.207 of the 
Commission's Regulations, so that its proposed repagination tariff 
sheet become effective June 15, 1998.
    CNG states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's directive to correct the pagination of a duplicately 
numbered tariff sheet from CNG's June 3, 1998 filing in Docket No. 
RP98-234-001. CNG proposes no substantive revision to the content of 
these tariff sheets, other than that which was reflected in CNG's June 
3, 1998 filing.
    CNG states that copies of its filing have been mailed to CNG's 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16192 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135256 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135256 

 COA: 271155 

Wayne CC: 05-012697-01

PATRICK LAWRENCE BARNES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 2, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 19, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-89473, 333-23091, 333-39493, 333-54026, 333-122840, 333-122841, 333-132558, 333-132559, 333-143720, 333-157258, and 333-157262) of LaserCard Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports dated June 10, 2010, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of LaserCard Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2010.




/s/SingerLewak LLP




San Jose, California


June 15, 2010
No. 10-6494.

#### James Edward Greer, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 989, 131 S. Ct. 434,

178 L. Ed. 2d 337,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8295.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 607 F.3d 559.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 0321

_____________________________
T ERRENCE G LOVER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Marianne L. Aho , Judge

. July 24, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , R OBERTS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Terrence Glover, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit No. 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Schneider, Executive Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|/s/RICHARD A. SCHNEIDERRichard A. Schneider Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial OfficerMay 30, 2008 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DRS
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-194.

#### In re Richard John Florance, Jr., Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 347,

178 L. Ed. 2d 256,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7671.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
#### Scott A. Safier, Respondent, v Saggio Restaurant Inc. et al., Respondents, and Tri-State Biodiesel, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[54 NYS3d 272]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Donna M. Mills, J.), entered December 13, 2016, which denied defendant Tri-State Biodiesel, LLC’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Defendant Tri-State Biodiesel, which collects used cooking oil from restaurants, established prima facie that it did not cause the large slick of cooking oil and/or grease to be on the road where plaintiff slipped and fell riding his bicycle. TriState submitted an affidavit by its general manager saying that he had searched its records and that the records indicated that the company had not collected oil from its codefendants, restaurant operators and the owners of the building in which the restaurants are located, since January 25, 2013, about 16 months before the accident happened on the road adjacent to the building *(see Piccinich v New York Stock Exch.,*257 AD2d 438, 439 [1st Dept 1999]). Tri-State also submitted deposition testimony by its codefendants admitting either that they had never been serviced by it or that they had had no dealing with it for more than a year before the accident happened *(see Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Khan,*93 AD3d 618, 619 [1st Dept 2012]). These unsigned transcripts were properly before the motion court, because the deponents were served with notices to execute more than 60 days before Tri-State moved for summary judgment, every transcript was certified by a reporter, and neither plaintiff nor co-defendants challenged the accuracy of the testimony *(see*CPLR 3116 [a]; *Franco v Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, Ltd.,*103 AD3d 543 [1st Dept 2013]).

*544In opposition, plaintiff and codefendants neither submitted an affidavit demonstrating the existence of an issue of fact nor made any attempt to show that facts essential to justify their opposition to the motion existed that could not be stated absent a deposition of Tri-State (see CPLR 3212 [f]; *Guaman v Ansley & Co., LLC,*135 AD3d 492, 492 [1st Dept 2016]). They failed to show that the proof they claim they need is within the exclusive knowledge or control of Tri-State and that their opposition to Tri-State’s motion is supported by something other than mere hope or conjecture (see *Voluto Ventures, LLC v Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP,*44 AD3d 557 [1st Dept 2007]).

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Richter, Webber and Kahn, JJ.
# Former employee receives DoD leadership award

/ Published Jan. 14, 2016
ARLINGTON, Virginia,
# When the nation calls Royal Cline answers

/ Published May 20, 2024
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
A video series showcasing Defense Logistics Agency team members from across the agency recently featured DLA Land and Maritime’s Royal Cline.

“When the Nation Calls, DLA Answers,” spearheaded by DLA Video Producer Nutan Chada, highlights DLA team members who embrace the idea of "Warfighter Always" and who provide logistics support whenever and wherever it is needed.

Cline retired from the Army in 2004 and began working for DLA six months later. Now, he is a customer support representative working with Commander Naval Surface Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet, and dedicates his time to providing the Navy with the best logistics support possible.

“I think me being able to come back and being able to work around young people in uniform has kept me young, kept my focus – and I think that's why I'm alive today,” Cline said.

The video series can be viewed on DLA’s official YouTube channel or on DVIDS.
No. 10-178.

#### Shawn M. Lockett, et ux., Petitioners v. City of New Orleans, Louisiana, et al.

562 U.S. 1003, 131 S. Ct. 507,

178 L. Ed. 2d 371,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8534.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 607 F.3d 992.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           149
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         3,462
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    4,379
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         2,732
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           2,652
<LOANS>                                       19,238
<ALLOWANCE>                                      391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                29,851
<DEPOSITS>                                    23,906
<SHORT-TERM>                                   2,300
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               97
<LONG-TERM>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           2
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                29,851
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  381
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                108
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  41
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 530
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               224
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               254
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            276
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  113
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                      75
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.81
<LOANS-NON>                                       80
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   61
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 406
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     15
<RECOVERIES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                391
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             116
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          275


</TABLE>
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.39  


 
  Amendment to Employment Agreement    
    



        This Amendment is made this 2nd day of December, 2004 by and between Interline Brands, Inc. ("Company"), whose address is 801 West Bay Street,
Jacksonville, Florida 32204 and Pamela L. Maxwell ("Executive"). 


        WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated January 7, 2004, amended
September 27, 2004 (the "Agreement"); and, 


        WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to modify and amend the Agreement and certain provisions thereof. 



        NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree as follows: 


	1.
	Section 5
of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding with following new sentences at the end thereof. 



The
effectiveness of the following sentence of this Section 5 shall be contingent upon and shall only become effective upon the date of the closing of the Company's initial public offering of
the Company's Common Stock (the "Offering"). The Executive shall be entitled to receive a one time bonus on the date of the closing of the Offering from the Company equal to $185,000 paid in cash. 



	2.
	Except
as modified or amended herein, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. Nothing contained herein invalidates or shall impair or release any covenant, condition or
stipulation in the Agreement, and the same, except as herein modified and amended, shall continue in full force and effect.



	3.
	This
Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one Agreement. The parties
specifically agree that facsimile signatures are acceptable and permitted and shall be considered original and authentic. Each party executing this Agreement represents that such party has the full
authority and legal power to do so. 



        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, which is effective as of the date first above written. 



	INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.	 	EXECUTIVE
	

By:	
 	

	
 	

By:	
 	


	 	 	(Signature)	 	 	 	(Signature)
	

Name:	
 	

	
 	

Name:	
 	

/s/  PAMELA L. MAXWELL      
 Pamela L. Maxwell
	

Title:	
 	

	
 	

Title:	
 	


	

Date:	
 	

	
 	

Date:	
 	















QuickLinks


Amendment to Employment Agreement
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34374-34375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16707]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-3297-000]


Wisconsin Electric Power Company; Notice of Filing

June 16, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 11, 1998, Wisconsin Electric Power Company 
(Wisconsin Electric), tendered for filing an electric service agreement 
under its Market Rate Sales Tariff (FERC Electric Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 8) with Columbia Energy Power Marketing Corporation 
(Columbia). Wisconsin Electric respectfully requests an effective date 
of May 20, 1998 to allow for economic transactions.
    Copies of the filing have been served on Columbia, the Michigan 
Public Service Commission, and the Public Service Commission of 
Wisconsin.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

[[Page 34375]]

and protests should be filed on or before July 1, 1998. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers.
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16707 Filed 6-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VAUGHN YOUNG,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 78 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# DLA Land and Maritime Commander to participate in Tactical Wheeled Vehicles Conference

/ Published Feb. 16, 2023
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Commander Army Brig. Gen. Gail Atkins will join fellow leaders from across the country for the 2023 Tactical Wheeled Vehicles Conference February 27 – March 1 in downtown Columbus.

The annual conference – recognized as the premier event for the tactical wheeled vehicle industry – brings together leaders from the Department of Defense, the military services, industry, prime contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and academia to address present and future requirements of tactical wheeled vehicles. This year, discussions will focus on multi-service modernization and sustainment goals for 2030.

Atkins will discuss DLA Land and Maritime’s critical role in serving and supporting warfighter readiness.

DLA Land and Maritime is the ground and sea-based demand and supply chain manager for the Defense Logistics Agency. The organization has 2,600 civilian and military personnel based in 30 locations across the United States including DLA Depot Level Reparable detachments, Marine Corps industrial sites and detachments supporting U.S. Navy shipyards. It is the U.S. military’s integrated material manager for 2.5 million spare and repair parts supporting more than 2,000 multiservice weapon systems and the warfighters who rely on them.

Atkins also commands the Defense Supply Center Columbus, a Central Ohio logistics hub home to 31 tenant organizations including the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Columbus, Navy Talent Acquisition Group, the Ohio Army National Guard’s Regional Training Institute, and units with the OARNG and U.S. Army Reserve.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
to my knowledge that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or
"filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: August 14, 2002                     Name:  /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Sheldon C. Fenton
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2073 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 568
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2073

   To designate the United States courthouse that is scheduled to be 
constructed in Concord, New Hampshire, as the ``Warren B. Rudman United 
              States Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 4 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

 Mr. Smith (for himself, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Biden, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Pell, 
 Mr. Warner, Mr. Simon, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Dole, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Reid, Mr. 
Hollings, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Bond, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Craig, Mr. D'Amato, 
   Mr. Inouye, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Coats, Mr. Shelby, Mr. 
Cochran, Mr. Gorton, and Mr. Lott) introduced the following bill; which 
was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

              August 12 (legislative day, August 11), 1994

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the United States courthouse that is scheduled to be 
constructed in Concord, New Hampshire, as the ``Warren B. Rudman United 
              States Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WARREN B. RUDMAN UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse that (as of the date of enactment of 
this Act) is scheduled to be constructed in Concord, New Hampshire, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Warren B. Rudman United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record, map, or other 
paper of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Warren B. Rudman United 
States Courthouse''.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 568

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2073

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To designate the United States courthouse that is scheduled to be 
constructed in Concord, New Hampshire, as the ``Warren B. Rudman United 
              States Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

              August 12 (legislative day, August 11), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
```