alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-11564.

#### Laura Nancy Veronica Rondonuwu, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 888, 131 S. Ct. 221,

178 L. Ed. 2d 133,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6900.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
No. 10-29.

#### Hakeem Curry, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 890, 131 S. Ct. 244,

178 L. Ed. 2d 137,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6744.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 339 Fed. Appx. 176.
No. 09-11217.

#### Horace D. McCray, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 868, 131 S. Ct. 162,

178 L. Ed. 2d 96,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6683.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 395 Ill. App. 3d 1116, 369 Ill. Dec. 493, 986 N.E.2d 806.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         186,444
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (22,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    881,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,329,398
<PP&E>                                       1,145,202
<DEPRECIATION>                               (922,493)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,407,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          343,091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,483
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,176,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,407,737
<SALES>                                      1,559,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,559,141
<CGS>                                        1,124,068
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,124,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,194,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (6,306)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             122,854
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (876,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (876,893)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (876,893)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.45)
        

</TABLE>
No. 09-11571.

#### Jimmy Sprague, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 888, 131 S. Ct. 223,

178 L. Ed. 2d 134,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7058.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 638.
#### In the Matter of Marek Hyra, Appellant, v Thomas J. Jacobellis, Justice of Town of Carmel Justice Court, et al., Respondents.

[47 NYS3d 717]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondent Justice Thomas Jacobellis of the Town of Carmel Justice Court to reinstate certain charges formerly pending in that Court, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Nicolai, J.), dated December 27, 2013, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petition was properly denied, and the proceeding was properly dismissed, as barred by the four-month statute of limitations applicable to CPLR article 78 proceedings *(see*CPLR 217 [1]; *Matter of Holtzman v Marrus,*74 NY2d 865 [1989]).

Eng, P.J., Leventhal, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Demorest,Chief Executive Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of MOCON, Inc.

 

 

Date:  August 14, 2008

 
| /s/ Robert L. Demorest  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Robert L. Demorest      |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 1523 V

UNPUBLISHED

AMELIA LUNDY

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: April 16, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , for P etitioner.

Colleen Clemons Hartley , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On October 2, 2019

, Amelia Lundy filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ( “ S IRVA ” ) as a resul t of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vacc ine administered on
October 17, 2018 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 16, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that

P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent “ has determined that [P]etitioner ’ s medical course is consist ent

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012 ).2

with a [SIRVA] as defined by the V acci ne I n jury Table

. ” Id. at 3 . Respondent further
agrees that Petitioner suff ered the residual effects of her condition for more than six

months

. Id. at 4.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
No. 10-5530.

#### Fredy Villafuerte, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 927, 131 S. Ct. 314,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7112.

178 L. Ed. 2d 205,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 1303.
#### Com. v. Kalkbrenner

09/28/2015

65 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 118 A.3d 446
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2466 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2466

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic 
      Petroleum Reserve more effectively, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 27 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

  Mr. Johnston (for himself and Mr. Wallop) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic 
      Petroleum Reserve more effectively, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be 
cited as the ``Energy Policy and Conservation Act Amendments Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE.

    This title may be cited as the ``Energy Policy and Conservation Act 
Amendments of 1994''.

SEC. 102. TITLE I AMENDMENTS.

    Part D of title I of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act is 
amended in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251), by striking ``September 30, 
1994'' each time it appears and inserting ``June 30, 1995''.

SEC. 103. TITLE II AMENDMENTS.

    Part D of title II of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act is 
amended in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285), by striking ``September 30, 
1994'' each time it appears and inserting ``June 30, 1996''.
                                 <all>
```
# November New Employees

/ Published Jan. 30, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The November New Employee Orientation was held Nov. 20-21, 2019 in the Building 20, Buckeye Room. The class had four new employees in attendance. 

The attendees were welcomed to the event by Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Director of Operations Griff Warren.  The session gave the new associates an overview of the many services and opportunities available to them.  The forum allowed the new employees an opportunity to ask questions, especially from the presenter for Human Resource Benefits.

Please welcome these new employees as they begin their DLA careers.
No. 10-5459.

#### Robert Jackson, Sr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 923, 131 S. Ct. 303,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7254.

178 L. Ed. 2d 197,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 10.11

                         ARDENT ACQUISITION CORPORATION

                                                ______________, 2005

American Fund Advisors, Inc.
1415 Kellum Place, Suite 205
Garden City, New York 11530

Gentlemen:

      This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective
date ("Effective Date") of the registration statement for the initial public
offering ("IPO") of the securities of Ardent Acquisition Corporation ("AAC") and
continuing until (the "Termination Date") the earlier of the consummation by AAC
of a "Business Combination" or the distribution of AAC's "Trust Fund" (as such
terms are described in AAC's IPO prospectus), American Fund Advisors, Inc. shall
make available to AAC certain office and secretarial services as may be required
by AAC from time to time, situated at 1415 Kellum Place, Suite 205, Garden City,
New York 11530. In exchange therefore, AAC shall pay American Fund Advisors,
Inc. the sum of $7,500 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly
thereafter until the Termination Date.

                                        Very truly yours,


                                        ARDENT ACQUISITION CORPORATION

                                        By:
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:
                                            Title:

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


AMERICAN FUND ADVISORS, INC.

By:
    -------------------------
    Name:
    Title:
# DLA Land & Maritime commander visits DLA Distribution Europe

/ Published Feb. 24, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Army Brig. Gen. Gail Atkins, commander of Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime and Army Command Sgt. Maj. Tomeka O’Neal, DLA senior enlisted leader, visited DLA Distribution Europe Jan. 22.

DDDE leadership provided a tour of the Logistics Distribution Center Europe building where DDDE Deputy Commander, Neil Flanagan, outlined the capabilities, missions and successes of the DDDE team. Following the tour, DLA Europe & Africa Commander, Army Col. Faith Chamberlain discussed the region’s efforts to get to a “one DLA” standard for DLA customers. Regional Security Operations Center Chief, Marine Corps Lt. Col. George Steinfels, followed with a discussion of the duties of his team including the expeditionary team on the Eastern Flank.

DDDE Commander, Army Lt. Col. Kimberly Rembert, gave a presentation on the organizational structure and culture that allows DDDE to complete its mission. The culmination of the DDDE mission is usually on DDDE’s dedicated truck network, which currently has 30 routes to 61 locations across 18 international borders. Since military repair parts are a focal point for DLA Land and Maritime, Rembert outlined the phenomenal record of success achieved by A8M, the DDDE run Army supply support activity. The support activity is a readiness driver of critical parts for the Army in Europe.

“To put A8M’s workload in perspective, with just 13 full time employees, the team processed almost 64,000 material release orders in fiscal year 2022. That is astounding,” Rembert said.

DLA Energy Europe & Africa Commander, Army Lt. Col. Benverren Fortune, outlined the challenges of getting different types of fuels to disparate customers in the region. DLA Troop Support Europe & Africa Commander, Army Lt. Col. Fermin Gonzales, outlined the classes of supply handled locally and commented on the success of the material release order program and how it allows customers to rapidly source materials.

Atkins led a discussion on how material moves across the theater, in particular from DLA to customers, and what role the Army has in that process. At DDDE, that is mostly done via the A8M warehouse, and Atkins had the opportunity to see the tires and repairable parts her team manages. Atkins expressed to the team that lessons learned in the European Command now, could help re-define Army logistics doctrine in the future.
# Energy efficiency contract awarded for Hurlburt Field

/ Published Aug. 9, 2021
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla., 
Hurlburt Field, Florida, is set to receive energy efficiency infrastructure improvements following the July 21, 2021 award of an Energy Saving Performance Contract by the Defense Logistics Agency Energy. The $22.6 million ESPC Task Order, awarded to Schneider Electric Buildings Americas, Inc., is a collaborative effort between DLA-Energy, Hurlburt Field and the Air Force Civil Engineer Center — a primary subordinate unit of the Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center — to support Hurlburt’s energy assurance needs.The project will reduce energy consumption and maintenance costs, supporting the Air Force’s goal to improve resilience, optimize demand and assure a vital energy supply for every mission. The ESPC includes six Energy Conservation Measure upgrades to 377 facilities and will save 65,286 million British thermal units of energy annually.“The 1st Special Operations Civil Engineer Squadron personnel have put in a lot of effort to reach the final ESPC contract, and I’m extremely pleased with the outcome,” said Steve Loken, Hurlburt Field CE electrical engineer. “The installation of new equipment and the standardization of the lighting and direct digital control equipment will reduce maintenance and energy consumption. We appreciate the collaboration between DLA Energy and AFCEC to get us to the finish line.”The project scope includes an upgraded energy management control system, high-efficiency transformers, duct sealing, and interior, exterior and airfield apron LED lighting upgrades. In addition to infrastructure upgrades, the ESPC will also deliver a 240kW solar photovoltaic array with a 200kW/112 kWhr battery energy storage system for the base central mainframe facility, a critical node to Air Force Special Operations Command.“This ESPC project stabilizes electrical power for this mission-critical facility,” said Mark Dent, ESPC project manager. “Providing power to the mainframe facility improves resiliency and protects vital AFSOC missions from interruption.”Construction is set to begin this month and is expected to be complete by February 2023.The ESPC program is a tool for installations to make smart energy decisions, optimize energy using 21st century technologies and support mission assurance through energy assurance. To date, AFCEC has collaborated with contracting groups to develop and award more than $1.4 billion in energy savings contracts since 2015.  Installations interested in pursuing energy projects can visit the CAC-enabled web site for the Office of Energy Assurance.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Air Force Materiel Command website.*
No. 09-1211.

#### Mayra Isabel Jerez-Sanchez, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.

562 U.S. 828, 131 S. Ct. 73,

178 L. Ed. 2d 25,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6582.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 09-11484.

#### Daniel Oglesby, Petitioner v. Michael Bowersox, Warden.

562 U.S. 883, 131 S. Ct. 207,

178 L. Ed. 2d 125,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7050.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 592 F.3d 922.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the Merit Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the National 
Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Name of Committee: Merit Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the 
National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
    Date of Meeting: February 11, 1998.
    Time: 7:00 p.m. to adjournment.
    Place of Meeting: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro 
Center, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Mark Green, Ph.D., 6000 Executive Blvd, Suite 
409, Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-2860.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.271, Alcohol 
Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 
93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research 
Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; National Institutes of 
Health)

    Dated: January 8, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-1556 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-48978) pertaining to the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
2000 Stock Plan, Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan, 1998 Director's
Stock Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-35926)
pertaining to the 1997 Adaptive Telecom, Inc. Stock Plan of our report dated
February 11, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Metawave Communications Corporation as of December 31, 1999 and for the years
ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Seattle, Washington
March 30, 2001
No. 10-146.

#### Yao-Wen Chang, et al., Petitioners v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, et al.

562 U.S. 895, 131 S. Ct. 322,

178 L. Ed. 2d 146,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6220.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 599 F.3d 728.
#### In the Matter of Ira J. Benlevi, Appellant, v New York City Department of Buildings, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 9]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, *452J.), entered June 28, 2016, which denied the petition to annul the determination of respondent New York City Department of Buildings (DOB), dated January 26, 2016, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, on the grounds that petitioner’s revised penalty of the suspension of his filing privileges for three years and seven months was not excessive, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Given the circumstances of this case, that petitioner falsely represented that he was licensed to practice architecture when, during his six-month suspension from practice, he filed post-approval amendments with the DOB, petitioner’s penalty of three years seven months was not “shocking to one’s sense of fairness” *(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 237 [1974]). Despite the fact that petitioner’s violations related to post-approval amendments to filings, and not new plans *(cf. Matter of St. Clair Nation v City of New York,*14 NY3d 452, 454-455, 458 [2010]), the Supreme Court properly considered petitioner’s continued refusal to acknowledge any wrongdoing in upholding the revised penalty *(see Matter of Roman v New York City Dept. of Educ.,*128 AD3d 590, 591 [1st Dept 2015]).

The article 78 proceeding was limited to petitioner’s revised penalty, thus, his attempt to reargue the merits of his case are unavailing.

Concur—Acosta, J.R, Renwick, Mazzarelli, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.