alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Mitchell S. Drucker, a Suspended Attorney.

[51 NYS3d 181]

Motion by Mitchell S. Drucker for reinstatement to the Bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Mr. Drucker was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 7, 1995. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated December 7, 2010, the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against Mr. Drucker based upon the acts of professional misconduct set forth in a verified petition dated May 18, 2010, Mr. Drucker was barred from relitigating any of the factual issues raised therein based upon the doctrine of collateral estoppel, and the matter was referred to the Honorable Geoffrey J. O’Connell, as Special Referee, to hear and report solely on the issue of mitigation. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated September 9, 2011, Mr. Drucker’s motion to dismiss the petition was denied, and the Grievance Committee’s cross motion to dismiss Mr. Drucker’s affirmative defenses was denied, without prejudice to seeking relief before the Special Referee. By opinion and order of this Court dated July 17, 2013, Mr. Drucker was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, commencing August 16, 2013, based on two charges of professional misconduct *(see Matter of Drucker,*109 AD3d 292 [2013]). By decision and order of this Court dated June 10, 2016, Mr. Drucker’s motion for reinstatement was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness to investigate and report on his character and general fitness to practice law.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the report of the Committee on Character and Fitness and the exhibits annexed thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that, effective immediately, Mitchell S. Drucker is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Mitchell S. Drucker to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

Eng, P.J., Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Roman, JJ., concur.
# Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month Spotlight: Majeeda Gathers

/ Published April 28, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
*Editor’s Note: The Defense Logistics Agency recognizes April as Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. To honor the contributions of sexual assault response coordinators, DLA is highlighting those who work daily to support the agency’s global mission.*

**My name is:** Majeeda Gathers

**I am:**A sexual assault response coordinator at DLA Distribution, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania.  

**Describe your job in a sentence:** I provide victim support to all DLA employees who have experienced sexual violence.

**How long have you worked at DLA?** Seven months

**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?** Considering that I have been teleworking since I began working for DLA, I would say my favorite thing about working for DLA would be meeting my co-workers and supervisors, even though it has all been through video and voice chats.

**How do you make a difference?** By always staying mission oriented. I will continue to engage agency leaders to ensure annual SAPR training requirements are being met and will continue to treat all victims of sexual violence with the dignity and respect that they deserve.

**Why is it important that we have a SAPR program?** I believe the importance of DLA’s SAPR program is primarily to create a healthy, safe work environment free from sexual violence for all DLA employees. It is required that each DLA employee complete SAPR training annually which encourages that each employee treat one another with dignity and respect.

**What do you want DLA employees to know about the SAPR program?** DLA’s SAPR program is here to promote awareness, training, advocacy and outreach to all DLA employees nationwide. It’s the responsibility of each DLA employee to assist with the prevention of sexual violence and to speak up when they witness these acts.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronnie Duren, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 473]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 15, 2015 *(People v Duren,*130 AD3d 842 [2015]), determining an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered December 12, 2012, as amended January 16, 2013.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Balkin, J.P., Austin, Sgroi and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
No. 10-5791.

#### Vasila Georgieva, Petitioner v. Barnes & Noble.

562 U.S. 967, 131 S. Ct. 499,

178 L. Ed. 2d 297,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8065,

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 24.4

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned hereby appoints Robert T. Slezak as his agent and
attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form
10-K relating to the year ending September 26, 1997, and any amendments
thereto, required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
AmeriTrade Holding Corporation.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the 17th day of December, 1997.


                                       /s/  Mark L. Mitchell
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Mark L. Mitchell, Director
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION


   I, James DiLorenzo, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors:

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.




         Date: October 6, 2005      /s/ James DiLorenzo
                                    -------------------
                                    James DiLorenzo
                                    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.02


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                      (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED)


     In connection with the Annual Report of Macrovision Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ian R.
Halifax certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted), that to the best of his knowledge:

(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification
as of March 31, 2003.


                                                       /s/ Ian R. Halifax
                                                   --------------------------
                                                   Ian R. Halifax
                                                   Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2014112EN.01002102.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 9 December 2013 — Lb Group Ltd v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Others

(Case C-651/13)

2014/C 112/26

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lb Group Ltd

Applicant:

Defendants: Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Amministrazione Autonoma dei Monopoli di Stato (AAMS) and Galassia Game Srl

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in [Joined Cases C-72/10 and C-77/10 Costa and Cifone [2012] ECR] to be interpreted as precluding a call for tenders for the award of licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past, where that tendering procedure has been launched in order to remedy the consequences of the unlawful exclusion of a certain number of operators from earlier tendering procedures? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in [Joined Cases C-72/10 and C-77/10 Costa and Cifone [2012] ECR] to be interpreted as precluding a call for tenders for the award of licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past, where that tendering procedure has been launched in order to remedy the consequences of the unlawful exclusion of a certain number of operators from earlier tendering procedures?

Costa and Cifone

| 2. | Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Costa and Cifone to be interpreted as precluding the possibility that sufficient justification for the shorter period of validity of licences offered for tender, as compared with licences awarded in the past, can be found in the requirement for the licensing system to be reorganised through the alignment of licence expiry dates? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Costa and Cifone to be interpreted as precluding the possibility that sufficient justification for the shorter period of validity of licences offered for tender, as compared with licences awarded in the past, can be found in the requirement for the licensing system to be reorganised through the alignment of licence expiry dates?

Costa and Cifone

---
Classified 

Advertising 

Invoice 

Kay Whistler 

Yolo-Solano AQMD 

1947 Galileo Court, Suite 103 

DAVIS, CA 95618 

( Ad# Text 

03548866·001 Rule 2.22 Gasol 

( Please return a copy with payment 

Start Stop 

11/21/14 11/21/14 

REC.EHEJ NOV 2 6 Zf114 

The Davis Enterprise 

Classified and Legal Advertising 

P.O. Box 1470 

Davis, CA 95617 

Phone: (530) 756-0800 

Fax: (530) 756-7504 

Gust#: 

Phone: 

Date: 

05100163-000 

(530)757-3675 

11/24/14 

Due Date: 12/15/14 

Days I Amount Prepaid 

80.38 0.00 

Total Due 

3 

Due ) 

80.38 

80.38 ) 
(2015.5 C.C.P.) 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

County of Yolo 

I am a citizen of the United States 

and a resident of the county aforesaid. 

I am over the age of eighteen years 

and not a party to or interested 

in the above-entitled matter. 

I am the principal clerk of the 

printer of 

THE DAVIS ENTERPRISE 

315 G STREET 

printed and published Tuesday through 

Friday and Sunday in the city of Davis, 

County of Yolo, and which newspaper has 

been adjudged a newspaper of general 

circulation by the Superior Court 

of the County of Yolo, State of 

California, under the date of 

July 14, 1952, Case Number 12680. 

That the notice, of which the annexed 

is a printed copy (set in type not 

smaller than non-pareil), has been 

issue of said newspaper and not in 

any supplement thereof on the 

following dates to-wit: 

November 21 

All in the year(s) 2014 

I certify (or declare) under penalty 

of perjury that the foregoing 

is true and correct. 

Dated at Davis, California, 

This 21'tday of November, 2014. 

~~ Berkeley McNaughton 

Legal Advertising Clerk 

IECEIVEI NOV 2 6 2014 

Filing Stamp 

Proof of Publication 

DE206030 

PHN 

Public 

Notices 

Public 

Notices 

l . .... ... . ·. 

Yolo-Solano Air Management Distri<;t 

Public Hearing Notice 

Proposed Amen.dments to 

Rule 2.22; GASOLINE 

DISPENSING FACILITIES 

The Yolq-Solano Air Quality Management 

District (District) Board of Directors Will 

consider the proposed amendments of 1 

District Rule 2.22 Gasoline Dispensing Fll- 1 

cilili_'es an_d approve the filing. of a Notice 1 

of Exemption pursuant to the California 1 

Environmental Quality Act. Rule 2.22 will 1 

be amended to exempt specified facilities I 

frnm- Phase ll requirements; exempt ESS:· i 

fu-eiling fa_ci1ities from Phase Jl .reQuire- i 

'!ilents, and exempt aboveground tan~s .•. 

'that :meet specific requirements from.-~n­

"hanCed- Vapo'r 'Recoyery', ,reQui.re_f11.ents. 

The proposed rule and staff Teport .are 

·aVailable on the District's WetiSite 

(w\VW.ysaqrrid.orgl or may be obtaini>ij 

•oy contacting Matt Baldwin at · (S3Q)757-3679. 

tfie public hearing wHI . .be held. at the folloWing tim~--~~d-!ocation: .. ·· .,. ··-- ·-

Wednesday, Januar'Y 14, io1s9:oOAM''' 

Yolo-Solano Air Quality 

Management District 

1947 Galileo Court, Suite 103 

Davis, California 95618 

(530) 757-3650 

The District- invites_._ written public colllments- to be submitted to ·-Engineering 

_Manager, Frank DeMaris at the above address. Comments are_ to be received ·'by - the District by December 12, 2014. 

DE206010 

:~;-<-­

.Nqvember 21, 2014
# Installation exercise to test emergency response capabilities

/ Published Aug. 10, 2023
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Supply Center Columbus will conduct a full-scale active shooter exercise Aug. 17 to test emergency response procedures.

The exercise will incorporate first responder protocols, shelter-in-place drills and lockdown actions at installation buildings and access points as participating agencies practice operational responses in real time.

Participants include Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Columbus, the Ohio National Guard, DLA Police Department, DLA Fire Department and local emergency services in the surrounding area.

Glynn Pleasant, the installation’s Emergency Operations Manager, said knowledge gained during the exercise will help ensure organizations both inside and outside DSCC’s perimeter are ready to respond side-by-side in a crisis to save lives and provide essential support during recovery operations.

For the exercise, Pleasant created an authentic scenario to assess the capability of DSCC to respond to and recover from an active shooter event that results in casualties or potential damage to critical assets.

“This helps our workforce become more familiar with exercising all parts of their emergency action plans and gives us a valuable opportunity to evaluate the plans, policies and procedures which are written to keep the installation safe,” he said.

During the scenario, the DLA Land and Maritime workforce will react in real time to a situation initiated by anonymous role players. DFAS – Columbus and the Ohio National Guard will participate in the lockdown and respond according to their established emergency action plans. Designated evaluators and base leadership will be on site throughout the exercise to monitor progress and identify opportunities for further training.

Pleasant cautioned that traffic attempting to enter or exit the installation during this period may experience minor delays. Installation employees should expect to see emergency vehicles and hear loudspeaker announcements.

Pleasant said the value of exercising emergency responses versus simulating them can’t be overstated.

“You always fall back on training in any stressful situation,” he said. “People may think they have the correct answer when you simulate a response but that is not always the case once they must perform the actions.”

Pleasant said that full-scale exercises such as this one lay the groundwork for more complex scenarios in the future.

“The overarching goal is to ensure we have a workforce that is prepared to respond to any hazard they might face,” he said. “They will be able to take the skills they learn here and put them to use at home. A well trained and exercised workforce will respond quicker and more efficiently.”
No. 10-6002.

#### Dewayne A. Crompton, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 943, 131 S. Ct. 365,

178 L. Ed. 2d 235,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7430.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
#### People v Garcia (Angel)

3d Dept: 141 AD3d 861 (Albany)

denied 8/25/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
# C_2014421EN.01005001.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/50

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 September 2014 — Radelet v European Commission

(Case F-7/13) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials posted to a third country - Articles 5 and 23 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations - Provision of accommodation by the institution - Authorisation given to the official to rent accommodation - Action for compensation - Non-pecuniary loss - Allocation of uncomfortable and insalubrious accommodation - Lack of proof))

2014/C 421/69

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luc Radelet (Antananarivo, Madagascar) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil Service — Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the claim against the decision taken in response to the request of the applicant, posted to the Commission Delegation in Antananarivo, Madagascar, for compensation for the difficulties encountered when taking up his residence in that city.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Radelet to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Radelet to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013, p. 47.

1

---
#### Gordy v. Vega 35

02/22/2016

632 EAL (2015)

35

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter. Reconsideration Denied April 22, 2016.

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1130
# DLA 60th Anniversary Shout Out: Phyllis Copeland

/ Published Nov. 17, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA 60th Anniversary Shout Out: Phyllis Copeland, DLA Distribution Norfolk, sends a shout out to DLA for the 60th Anniversary.

00:21VIDEO  | 00:21 |DLA 60th Anniversary Shout Out: Phyllis Copeland, DLA Distribution Norfolk
No. D-2565.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Eric Tyrone Tolen.

562 U.S. 817, 131 S. Ct. 410,

178 L. Ed. 2d 274,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7611.

October 4, 2010.

Eric Tyrone Tolen, of St. Louis, Missouri, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
#### Donald Reid, Appellant, v Harrison Rubinstein et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[63 NYS3d 666]—

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered November 30, 2016, deemed appeal from judgments, same court and Justice, entered February 15, 2017, February 27, 2017, and May 26, 2017, dismissing the complaint as against defendants Sol Stolzenberg, D.M.D., d/b/a Toothsavers, Harrison Rubinstein, D.D.S., s/h/a Dr. Rubinstein, and Robert Winegarden, D.M.D, s/h/a Dr. Robert Winegarten, respectively, and, so considered, said judgments unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The trial court correctly granted defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of plaintiff’s dental malpractice case *(see*CPLR 4401; *Szczerbiak v Pilat,*90 NY2d 553, 556 [1997]). Plaintiff claims that defendants should have treated him with implants, rather than a bridge. However, his expert testified that, although he favored implants, both implants and a bridge were appropriate treatment options *(see Durney v Terk,*42 AD3d 335 [1st Dept 2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 813 [2007]).

The trial evidence demonstrates that, contrary to his contention, plaintiff’s consent to the insertion of a bridge was informed *(see Orphan v Pilnik,*15 NY3d 907 [2010]).

Nothing in the trial record shows judicial bias warranting a mistrial *(see Noboa-Jaquez v Town Sports Intl., LLC,*138 AD3d 493 [1st Dept 2016]).

The court properly precluded plaintiff’s expert from testifying as to bone grafting since no theory of liability involving bone grafting was included in plaintiff’s expert disclosure *(see*CPLR 3101 [d]), or his bill of particulars.

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Web-ber, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.