alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA leaders strengthen connections at AUSA 

/ Published Oct. 13, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency was part of the action at the annual Association of the U.S. Army Meeting and Exposition, meeting with vendor partners and guests at in Washington, D.C., this week. 

The theme for this year’s conference was “Building the Army of 2030.” Many members of DLA’s leadership attended to meet with vendors and customers and strengthen existing relationships to continue serving the warfighter.

“It’s important for DLA to be here to understand the priorities and required capabilities that we will be certainly supporting on behalf of the Army’s sustainment requirements for years to come,” said DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic.

She added that it’s vitally important to understand the critical requirements of all of DLA’s key customers, including service partners and combatant commands, to ensure the agency is in alignment with their needs. Events such as the AUSA Annual Meeting allow for those kinds of interactions.

“I’ve already run into several Army leaders, and that reinforces for them that we’re standing ready to support them no matter how hard, no matter where, anytime, anywhere,” Skubic said.

Supplier communication and interaction is one of the five focus areas of DLA’s Industry Engagement Plan. The AUSA Annual Meeting ran from Oct 10-12 and allows for in-person interaction with hundreds of suppliers, making it a highly effective venue to interact and engage with multiple DLA suppliers in a short period of time, said Matthew Beebe, director of DLA Acquisition.

“DLA leaders are able to conduct face-to-face meetings with dozens of DLA suppliers for frank and open conversations centered around warfighter support,” Beebe said. “Our participation maintains lines of communication with industry and allows us to stay current on innovations and trends being seen throughout the defense industrial base.”

Building great partnerships with the industrial base and earning the trust and confidence of supported commanders are key to providing world-class logistics material solutions for warfighters deployed around the world, said Army Brig. Gen. Eric Shirley, director of DLA Troop Support.

Shirley noted those relationships can only be built over time.

“This conference is an investment in senior leader time to make sure that we’re well abreast of the needs of our supported commanders, but also the capacity and challenges of our vendor partners,” Shirley said. “I really think that’s what this AUSA conference is for Troop Support. It’s understanding the needs of warfighters and understanding what our vendor partners can do for us.”
# DLA Police build trust, camaraderie at National Night Out at Noon event

/ Published Aug. 3, 2023
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Police Department hosted its second annual National Night Out at Noon event Aug. 1 at the Defense Supply Center Columbus Mission Park Pavilion. About 200 associates from DLA Land and Maritime, Defense Finance and Accounting Service -- Columbus and other tenants plus several classes of children from the DSCC Child Development Center were in attendance.

The event featured static displays, a bouncy house, educational materials, giveaways and music. The DLA Police Department also served up a free lunch of hamburgers, hot dogs and snacks for all who participated.

Deputy Chief Edward Compton manned the grill and Police Chief Marco Schmigotzki spoke to the crowd about the importance of building relationships between law enforcement and the public.

National Night out at Noon is modeled after the nationwide National Night Out events held in communities across the country.

Its origins come out of a movement in the 1970s when communities held community block watch parties with law enforcement to build trust and camaraderie, explained DLA Police Sgt. Greg Adams.

In 1984, a network of law enforcement agencies, neighborhood watch groups, civic groups, state and regional crime prevention associations and volunteers held the first National Night Out and the event has been held annually on the first Tuesday of August ever since, Adams added.  

Schmigotzki said the DSCC event is part of a larger community policing initiative to build trust and camaraderie between the DLA Police and the DSCC workforce.

“We always look forward to spending time with the associates to build that trust,” Schmigotzki said.

The next event will be the second annual Trunk or Treat in October on a date yet to be determined.

“We’ve got a live band, food trucks, a car show and a run with your pet 5K planned,” Adams said.

**Watch a video from the event**
No. 09-11364.

#### Julian Allmon, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 981, 131 S. Ct. 413,

178 L. Ed. 2d 322,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8156.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 981.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary C.
Granoff, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ GARY C. GRANOFF
----------------------------------------------
GARY C. GRANOFF
PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

May 14, 2004
#### K.J., In re

12/01/2015

573 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 449
FILED

July 23, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

MARCH SESSION, 1995

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) No. 01C01-9410-CC-00340

Appellee )

) COFFEE COUNTY

vs. )

) Hon. JOHN W. ROLLINS, Judge

ROSIE LEE WOOTEN, )

) (Voluntary Manslaughter)

Appellant )

DISSENTING OPINION

I respectfully disagree. Upon de novo review, I would grant probation. 

The facts of this case are unquestionably tragic. The appellant and the victim

co-habited for approximately twelve years. Their relationship was characterized

by excessive drinking and, on occasion, violence. The appellant contends that

she stabbed and killed the victim after he came home drunk, threatened to kill

her, and "choke[d] me until I could not breathe." However, assuming these facts

support the appellant’s incarceration, the record also reflects that the appellant is

currently eighty-one years of age. As noted by the majority, she suffers from

primary degenerative dementia of the Alzheimer's type, senile onset with

depression, dementia associated with alcoholism, and alcohol abuse. Although

the appellant was found sane, psychological testing revealed significant mental

confusion and disorganization which are progressive in nature. The appellant is

totally dependent upon her daughter for primary care. Finally, she has no prior

criminal history. Accordingly, incarceration of the appellant would serve no

public purpose. Sentencing principles involving deterrence, the need to protect

society by restraining a defendant who has a long history of criminal conduct,

and rehabilitation simply have no relevance in this case. See Tenn. Code Ann. §

40-35-102(3)(A)-(C)(1990); Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-103(1) (1990). Indeed,

from the record, it is doubtful that the appellant, if confined to the Department of
2

Correction, would realize that she was, in fact, imprisoned. Accordingly, based

upon the extraordinary circumstances presented, I find probation to be

appropriate.

____________________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, Judge
No. 10-5466.

#### Omar Ocasio, Petitioner v. Gary Greene, former Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al.

562 U.S. 923, 131 S. Ct. 304,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7338.

178 L. Ed. 2d 197,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# DLA Distribution launches re-warehousing dashboard application

/ Published Jan. 14, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa. , 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution launched a re-warehousing dashboard application within the agency’s Qlik® software in October. The application provides visibility to re-warehousing stow performance and tools to identify storage efficiencies at the agency’s 24 global distribution centers.

                Defense Logistics Agency Distribution’s 24 worldwide distribution centers can gain operational efficiencies by centralizing materials and collocating fast-moving inventory through a newly developed re-warehousing application.                            DLA Distribution launches re-warehousing dashboard application                            Defense Logistics Agency Distribution’s 24 worldwide distribution centers can gain operational efficiencies by centralizing materials and collocating fast-moving inventory through a newly developed re-warehousing application.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Distribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 220117-D-D0441-0002

The application provides near real time data for distribution center leadership to problem solve, make decisions faster and provides data allowing the opportunity for improved storage performance. DLA Distribution can gain operational efficiencies by centralizing materials and collocating fast-moving inventory, while also avoiding construction costs for new storage buildings and contract costs. In addition, the dashboard application displays site-specific data on re-warehousing pick to stow performance — month-to-date and historical — which addresses the need for timely stow of material to maintain audit readiness.

The application is updated weekly and includes the automation of site-specific tools, including re-warehousing triangle and combine reports, that provide distribution centers with targets of opportunity to improve storage density and material consolidation. This aspect of the application is most beneficial to storage managers at each site. The application also generates a report that shows the impact of completed re-warehousing actions on storage density over time.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Craig J. Cerny, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harrington West FinancialGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I, are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.Date: November 10, 2005                                                              /s/ Craig J. Cerny   Craig J. Cerny, Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-11088.

No. 09-11197.

#### Dahir Abdulle Shire, Petitioner v. United States. Mohamed Jama, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 950, 131 S. Ct. 139,

178 L. Ed. 2d 248,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7844.

October 4, 2010.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Same cases below, 369 Fed. Appx. 242.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7902

MICHAEL MCEVILY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER KEATON; OFFICER HUMPHRIES; JANE DOE,

a/k/a Miss Sue,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-01-279)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 6, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael McEvily, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael McEvily seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because McEvily’s

notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district

court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App.

P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and

jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 17, 2001. Giving him the benefit of Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)

and Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), McEvily’s notice of

appeal was filed, at the earliest, on October 28, 2001. Because

McEvily failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an

extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**

**Requiredby Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)**

**of theExchange Act**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAdvanstar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three and sixmonths ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W. Montgomery, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(1)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ David W. Montgomery     |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | David W. Montgomery         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |                        |
|   | Date: August 15,  2005 |

 

----
#### People v Cooper

2d Dept: 146 AD3d 898 (Nassau)

denied 3/29/17 (Garcia, J.)
# • •

State ofOregon's Revision Authorization Application for the Universal Treatment Standards Phase II Land Disposal Restrictions (September 19, 1994, 59 FR 48043)

Department of Environmental Quality Portland, Oregon

May 19, 1995

# • •

5/19/95

ATIORNEY GENERAL'S STATEMENT FOR FINAL AUTHORIZATION FOR CHANGESTO THE FEDERAL RCRA PROGRAM ON SEPTEMBER 19,1994, TEMPORARILY EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 19, 1994 AND FINALIZED MAY 18, 1995 I hereby certify, pursuant to my authority as AssistantAttorney General and in accordance with Section 3006(b) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (42 USC 6901 et seq.), and 40 CFR 271 that in my opinion the laws of the State of Oregon provide adequate authorityto carry out the revised program set forth in the revised "Attorney General Statement" submitted by the State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The specific authorities provided are contained in statutes or regulations lawfUlly adopted at the time this Statement is signed and which are in effect now, or shall be as specified below. These authorities and this certification supplement and amend previously certified authorities granted January 30,1986, FR 51, page 3779, effective January 31, 1986; March 30, 1990, FR 55, page 11909, effective May 29, 1990; and August 5, 1994, FR 59, page 39967, effective October 4, 1994.

I. LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
A. EQC requlations provide specific land disposal restriction phase II universal treatment standards, treatment standards for organic toxicity characteristic wastes and newly listed wastes, and testing and monitoring activities as indicated in the Revision Checklist. Citation: OAR 340-100-002(1), revised December2, 1994, effective December 19, 1994; revised final on May 18, 1995. Comments: OAR 340-100-002(1) incorporates by reference as adopted by the EQC 40 CFR Part 268, 40 CFR 268.1(c)(3)(ii), 268.1(e)(4), 268.1(e)(5), 268.1(c)(3)(iii), 268.2(g), 268.2(i), 268.7(a), 268.7(b)(4)(ii), 268.7(b)(5)(iv), 268.9(a), 268.9(d)(1)(i), 268.9(d)(1)(ii), 268.9(d)(1)(iii), 268.9(d)(2)(i), 268.9(d)(2)(ii), 268.38, 268.40, 268.41, 268.42, 268.43, 268.45(b)(2), 268.46, 268.48, and Part 268 Appendices IV, V, and X, as amended September 19, 1994 (59 FR 48043-48110). Authority to adopt these regulations is provided under ORS 183.355, ORS 466.020 and ORS 466.086. Federal Authority: RCRA §§3001 and 3004 (d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR 268.1(c)(3)(ii), 268.1(e)(4), 268.1(e)(5), 268.1(c)(3)(iii), 268.2(g), 268.2(i), 268.7(a), 268.7(b)(4)(ii), 268.7(b)(5)(iv), 268.9(a), 268.9(d)(1)(i), 268.9(d)(1 )(ii), 268.9(d)(1)(iii), 268.9(d)(2)(i), 268.9(d)(2)(ii), 268.38, 268.40, 268.41, 268.42, 268.43, 268.45(b)(2), 268.46, 268.48, and Part 268 Appendices IV, V, and X, as amended September 19, 1994 (59 FR 48043-48110), effective December 19, 1994, revised final on May 18, 1995.

# 1.1

.

Seal of Office 

# • •

Signature



# 1/**Dat~**

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eliniza Luna, Appellant.

[57 NYS3d 148]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J.), rendered June 1, 2016, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal possession of marijuana in the first degree, and sentencing her to a term of three years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

*620The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The suppression issue in this case turns on the credibility of an officer’s testimony that he smelled a strong odor of marijuana as he approached the car he had stopped, notwithstanding that the 10 pounds of marijuana he recovered was vacuum sealed in plastic bags and thus, according to defendant, could not have given off any detectable odor. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determination in this regard (see *generally People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). We note that no evidence was introduced at the hearing to support defendant’s assertion that it is impossible to detect odors given off by the contents of vacuum sealed bags.

The record also fails to support defendant’s contention that the hearing court, which detected a pungent odor of marijuana from the exhibit produced in court, was misled by the prosecutor’s statement that the marijuana was packaged in the same way at the time of the hearing as it had been at the time of the arrest. That statement was inaccurate, because in fact some or all of the marijuana had been removed from its vacuum sealed packages during testing by the police lab and then repackaged through a different process. Nevertheless, the hearing testimony made it clear to the court that the marijuana had been repackaged by the lab. Further, the court twice specifically stated that it had not been misled, rejecting the notion that it had adopted the premise that the packaging of the drugs was unchanged between the arrest and the hearing.

Finally, we find that the court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s belated request to conduct her own courtroom experiment on the effects of vacuum sealing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 4, 2020

s1028

Order 

Clerk

November 4, 2020

159689

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159689

COA: 341719

Wayne CC: 17-004983-FH

LISKO JONES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.