alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31774-31775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15365]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and time: Thursday, June 18, 1998 at 2 p.m. (Eastern Time).

Place: EEOC's Baltimore District Office, Conference Room on the fourth 
floor of the City Crescent Building, 10 South Howard Street, Baltimore, 
MD 21201.

Status: The meeting will be open to the public.

[[Page 31775]]

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Open Session

    1. Announcement of Notation Votes,
    2. Panel discussion on Charge Processing and Mediation, and
    3. Panel discussion on Outreach, Education and Technical 
Assistance.

    Note: Any matter not discussed or concluded may be carried over 
to a later meeting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC 
Commission meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also 
provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future 
Commission sessions.) Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and 
(202) 663-4074 (TTD) at any time for information on these meetings. 
Contact Person for More Information: Frances M. Hart, Executive 
Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
Frances M. Hart,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 98-15365 Filed 6-8-98; 2:32 pm]
BILLING CODE 6750-06-M
```
#### Michael McMahon et al., Appellants, v Cohen Brothers Realty Corp., Respondent.

[51 NYS3d 882]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Kalish, J.), entered November 30, 2015, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant established prima facie that the injured plaintiff was its special employee and therefore this action is barred by the workers’ compensation law’s exclusivity provision *(see*Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 11, 29 [6]; *Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp.,*78 NY2d 553 [1991]). The comprehensive *481property management agreement between defendant and plaintiff’s general employer (the property owner) provided that the maintenance and repair of the building resided exclusively with defendant. Defendant interviewed and hired plaintiff, whose work as an engineer was in furtherance of defendant’s operation and maintenance of the building, and defendant had the authority to terminate plaintiff’s employment, which it ultimately exercised. Defendant provided plaintiff with the materials and equipment he needed to perform his work, and directed, supervised and controlled plaintiff’s work *(see e.g. Vincente v Silverstein Props., Inc.,*83 AD3d 586 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 710 [2011]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact with his employment checks showing the general employer as the payor and his employment termination notice showing the general employer as his employer *(see e.g. Villanueva v Southeast Grand St. Guild Hous. Dev. Fund Co., Inc.,*37 AD3d 155, 157 [1st Dept 2007]). Plaintiff offered no evidence to controvert defendant’s showing that it hired him and controlled, supervised, and otherwise dictated all facets of his work in the building *(see id.*at 156).

In view of the foregoing, we do not reach plaintiff’s remaining arguments.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gary C. Granoff, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ GARY C. GRANOFF
----------------------------------------------
GARY C. GRANOFF
PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
May 16, 2005
#### Spearson v. Green

OP 17-0134

04/25/17

Denied

Original Proceeding Habeas Corpus
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summarized financial information extracted
from the Questar Gas Company Statements of Income and Balance Sheets for
the period ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,810
<PP&E>                                         887,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                 361,225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 654,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,487
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,974
<OTHER-SE>                                     214,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   654,720
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,789
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  143,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,714
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,714
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-5641.

#### Joel R. Ramos, Petitioner v. Washington.

562 U.S. 933, 131 S. Ct. 331,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7480.

178 L. Ed. 2d 215,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, denied.

Same case below, 152 Wash. App. 684, 217 P.3d 384.
EXHIBIT 32.2certification pursuant to 18 u.s.c. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of thesarbanes-oxley act of 2002The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to my knowledgethat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification isprovided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or “filed” for anypurpose whatsoever.       Date: November 14, 2007 Name: /s/ Russell Van Zandt     Russell Van Zandt    Title: Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-5008.

#### Michael L. Murray, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

562 U.S. 898, 131 S. Ct. 226,

178 L. Ed. 2d 151,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6302.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### Com. v. Yarsunas

12/16/2015

453 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 446
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600378

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

JULIO E. LIMON

Logistics Specialist Seaman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Ann Minami, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, USS NIMITZ (CVN 68).

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Commander 

James M. Kennedy, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Commander Robert D. Evans, Jr., JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 31 January 2017

_________________________

Before PALMER, CAMPBELL, and HUTCHISON, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
# Aviation leadership tour Minot Air Force Base

/ Published Aug. 3, 2023
RICHMOND, Va, 
Senior leadership from Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Customer Operations Directorate accompanied DLA Vice Director Brad Bunn on a site visit to Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, July 17-19. The purpose of the visit was to provide senior DLA leadership a chance to see in-person the weapon systems DLA supports at Minot.

Bunn and the Aviation team, led by Air Force Col. Daniel Willison, director of the Customer Operations Directorate, met with leadership from the Air Force’s 5th Bomb Wing, which supports the B-52H Stratofortress long-range, heavy bomber and 91st Missile Wing, one of the Air Force's three intercontinental ballistic missile wings.

Joining Willison from the Customer Operations Directorate were Melissa Miles, division chief of the Nuclear Enterprise Support Office, Stephen Connor, inter-continental ballistic missile weapons system program manager, Morgan Phillips, ICBM customer account specialist, and Kirk Mott, ICBM customer support manager within Aviation at Ogden’s Material Planning Division.

Daniel Nugent, supply management specialist within DLA Logistics Operations’ Nuclear and Space Enterprise Support Office at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, also attended the site visit.

Willison said these types of visits not only bring awareness to the critical missions DLA supports at Minot, but also expands dialogue and trust between the agency and the warfighter.
No. D-2529.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of William A. Fitzpatrick.

562 U.S. 812, 131 S. Ct. 403,

178 L. Ed. 2d 268,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7572.

October 4, 2010.

William A. Fitzpatrick, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
# DLA Aviation commander visits DLA Aviation at Cherry Point

/ Published Oct. 5, 2022
Richmond, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler visited DLA Aviation at Cherry Point, North Carolina, on Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point Sept. 19 and 20 for workforce engagement and discussions with senior leadership at Fleet Readiness Center East.   

Tyler was accompanied on the trip by Navy Capt. Ronald Hoak, chief of DLA Aviation’s Navy Customer Facing Division, Customer Operations Directorate, and Marine Corps Colonel Michael Kline, chief of DLA Aviation’s USMC Customer Facing Division, Customer Operations Directorate.

Tyler was able to meet and interact with employees who support aircraft, engine, component, and hazardous material workload as he toured the DLA Aviation spaces. Tyler coined five DLA Aviation at Cherry Point employees for their exceptional support to DLA Aviation, FRCE, and the warfighter.  At each workspace, employees had an opportunity to share their stories.

Tyler expressed to the workforce that for him, “it’s people first, mission always” and asked every employee to “trust your leadership, respect your peers, and mentor your subordinates.”

During the two-day visit, hosted by Navy Cmdr. David Odom, officer-in-charge, DLA Aviation at Cherry Point, Tyler toured the V-22 Osprey and H-53 heavy lift helicopter lines at FRCE on MCAS Cherry Point. He met with FRCE leadership where DLA and Navy collaboration successes were discussed and received a demonstration of the visual data tools being employed at the site.

Tyler also received several interactive briefings while at FRCE, including a detailed overview and demonstration of the organic and additive manufacturing capabilities on-site in support of the production lines.

During the visit, FRCE leadership expressed how their operations benefit greatly from DLA Aviation’s physical presence and how Commander Odom and the team are integrally involved in the daily production engagements and interactions.

“A big part of our success in reducing critical back orders and improving our turnaround times has been DLA’s integration in our daily tier meetings,” said Acting FRCE Executive Officer Marine Lt. Col. Jason Raper. “We have numerous examples of how our close communication and collaboration, happening all throughout the plant, is moving the readiness needle on the flight line.” 

To wrap up the visit, Tyler expressed how DLA is positioned to support service priorities and the national defense strategy.

“In the past, we focused on what was most efficient.  We need to also consider now what is best to meet the mission of competing with peer-to-peer competitors.” Tyler said.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David J. NobleDavid J. NobleChairman/DirectorAnd Principal Executive OfficerAugust 25, 2008Date
#### Jocelyn C. et al., Respondents, v Soundview Apartments Realty, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[62 NYS3d 273]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered April 22, 2016, which, insofar as appealed from, in this action for personal injuries suffered as a result of exposure to lead-based paint, denied the motion of defendant landlord Soundview Apartment Realty, LLC (Soundview) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court correctly determined that Soundview failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The record demonstrates that the subject building was constructed before 1960; that Soundview knew that a child younger than six resided in the apartment; and that Soundview had actual notice of a positive lead test in 2006 that it failed to remediate and that resulted in a February 2009 letter alerting it to the fact that the lead condition had not been addressed *(see e.g. Rivera v Neighborhood Partnership Hous. Dev. Fund Co. Inc.,*116 AD3d 633 [1st Dept 2014]; *Rivas v Danza,*68 AD3d 743 [2d Dept 2009]). The conclusion of Soundview’s expert that the positive lead paint test was too remote in time to establish proximate cause was insufficient to eliminate any issue of fact. The further conclusion of Soundview’s expert that the positive lead paint test was unreliable is disputed by, at the very least, the existence of a 2006 HPD violation.

We have considered Soundview’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.R, Richter, Andrias, Gische and Moulton, JJ.
# Battle Creek MWR host Children’s Holiday Party 

/ Published Dec. 20, 2022
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Battle Creek Morale, Welfare and Recreation hosted the annual Children’s Holiday Party Dec. 10 at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center in Battle Creek, Michigan.

                Battle Creek MWR hosted a Children's Holiday Party included a surprise visit from Santa Claus.                            Battle Creek MWR hosts Children's Holiday Party                            Battle Creek MWR hosted a Children's Holiday Party included a surprise visit from Santa Claus.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Kate Lambert LeeVIRIN: 221220-D-QJ961-113The event was paused during the pandemic, but this year Battle Creek MWR brought back the festive event. 

HDIFC employees, retirees, contractors, and their family members participated in bingo, crafts, games and more.

Santa Claus stopped in for a surprise visit and the Kingman Museum provided a bug-themed demonstration. A face painter, a caricature artist, and henna artist provided options for the whole family to participate in activities.

“The last couple years we have been unable to host the Children’s Holiday Party in the building as we have previously,” Battle Creek MWR Chief Tiffany Schmidt said. “The event is something the parents and children look forward to having each year and we are glad to see it return.”

The family-friendly event showcased the MWR Equipment Checkout program including bounce houses, bingo and Hoverball Archery.

For more information about services and rentals, visit MWR Battle Creek.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16225]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[UT-912-08-0777-52]


Utah Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
    Utah's Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet June 29-30, 1998. 
The RAC will be touring the Five Mile Pass Area and the Salt Flats 
looking at the impacts of recreation within these areas. The RAC will 
be briefed on OHV usage on the Five Mile Pass Recreation Area and 
looking at the results of the first year of the lay-down project along 
with filming use conflicts on the Salt Flats.
    A public comment period has been scheduled for June 29, from 4:30-
5:00 p.m. at the Comfort Inn, 491 South Main Street, Tooele, Utah. 
Anyone wishing to address the Council and/or attend the meeting should 
contact Sherry Foot, Special Programs Coordinator, Bureau of Land 
Management, 324 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111; 
telephone (801) 539-4195. Resource Advisory Council meetings are open 
to the public; however, transportation, meals, and overnight 
accommodations are the responsibility of the participating public.

    Dated: June 10, 1998.
Linda Colville,
Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 98-16225 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40912

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RODOLFO ACOSTA-ORELLANO,

also known as Adan Cruz,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-03-CR-33-1

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rodolfo Acosta-Orellano appeals his sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction for being found illegally

in the United States following deportation in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2).

Acosta-Orellano argues that his prior conviction for

possession of a controlled substance is not an aggravated felony

under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). This argument is foreclosed by
No. 03-40912

-2-

our decision in United States v. Caicedo-Cuero, 312 F.3d 697,

705-11 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 123 S. Ct. 1948 (2003).

AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 4, 2020

s1028 

# Order

Clerk November 4, 2020

159689

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159689

COA: 341719

Wayne CC: 17

- 004983

- FH

LISKO JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 28, 20 19

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
161 A.3d 762

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. L.D.D., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

March 9, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| \s\   Glenn M. Dobbs                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Glenn   M. Dobbs                        |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| May 16,   2011                     |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----