alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.3.1 STATE OF TEXAS
    
    HHSC Contract No. 65M1015HPCCOUNTY OF TRAVIS
 AMENDMENT 6
TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION
AND
AMERIGROUP TEXAS, INC.
FOR HEALTH SERVICES
TO THE
MEDICAID STAR+PLUS PROGRAMS
IN THE
HARRIS SERVICE DELIVERY AREA THIS CONTRACT AMENDMENT (the Amendment) is entered into between the
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION (HHSC), an administrative agency within
the executive department of the State of Texas, and AMERIGROUP Texas, Inc
(HMO), a health maintenance organization organized under the laws of the
State of Texas, possessing a certificate of authority issued by the Texas
Department of Insurance to operate as a health maintenance organization, and
having its principal office at 1200 E. Copeland Road, Suite 200, Arlington, TX,
76011.HHSC and CONTRACTOR may be referred to in this Amendment individually as
a Party and collectively as the Parties. The Parties hereby agree to amend their Agreement as set forth in Article 2 of
this Amendment. ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE. Section 1.01Authorization. This Amendment is executed by the Parties in accordance with Article 15.2 of
the Agreement. Section 1.02Effective date. The effective date of this amendment is March 1, 2004. ARTICLE 2. AMENDMENT TO THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES Section 2.01Modification of Appendix C, Value-added Services Appendix C of the Contract is modified to revise the value-added services
provided by the HMO on or after March 1, 2004 as follows: Delete all Behavioral Health Value-added Services for Members Over
21. The revised Appendix C is attached to this amendment and incorporated by reference into the Contract. HHSC Contract
    
    Page 1 of 2
    
    January 5, 2004




---



##### 



ARTICLE 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES The Parties contract and agree that the terms of the Agreement will remain
in effect and continue to govern except to the extent modified in this
Amendment. By signing this Amendment, the Parties expressly understand and agree that
this Amendment is hereby made a part of the Agreement as though it were set out
word for word in the Agreement. IN WITNESS HEREOF, HHSC and the CONTRACTOR have each caused this Amendment
to be signed and delivered by its duly authorized representative. AMERIGROUP TEXAS, INC.
    
    HEALTH& HUMAN SERVICESCOMMISSIONBy:
    
    /s/ Jim D. Donovan, Jr.
    
    By:Jim D. Donovan, Jr.
    
    
    
    Albert HawkinsPresident and CEO
    
    
    
    Executive CommissionerDate:
    
    1/9/2004
    
    Date:
 HHSC Contract
    
    Page 2 of 2
    
    January 5, 2004
The Great ShakeOut: what you can do to prepare for an earthquake
 
  By William Bullock, installation emergency manager, DLA Installation Management Richmond
  Emergencies can occur in the blink of an eye, with the impact ranging from temporary disruption of activities to a loss of an installation’s ability to perform its assigned missions. Employees receive warnings of approaching weather emergencies, such as blizzards, tornados, floods, etc., in time for them to take measures to minimize loss of life or property. However, there may be no warning signs when it comes to an earthquake. Although earthquakes are rare in Virginia, there is always the possibility. The Great ShakeOut drill started in Southern California in 2008 to educate the public on how to react in case of an earthquake. It’s now conducted internationally on the third Thursday of October. This year’s event takes place Oct. 15. There will be no physical drill conducted on Defense Supply Center Richmond this year due to the current COVID-19 environment, but information will be sent out via a system broadcast the day of the event. The Occupant Emergency Plan, found on the Defense Supply Center Richmond Employee Emergency Preparedness sharepoint webpage, outlines the following: 1. **Actions you should take if you find yourself inside when an earthquake hits:** a. Drop to the ground; take cover by getting under a sturdy table or another piece of furniture; and hold on until the shaking stops.  If there is not a table or desk near you, cover your face and head with your arms and crouch in an inside corner of the building. b. Stay away from windows, doors and anything that could fall, such as lighting fixtures or furniture. c. Stay inside until the shaking stops and it’s safe to go outside. Research has shown that most injuries occur when people inside buildings attempt to move to a different location inside the building or try to leave. **2.  Actions you should take if you find yourself outdoors when an earthquake hits:** a. Move away from buildings, streetlights, and utility wires. b. Once in the open, stay there until the shaking stops. The most significant danger exists directly outside buildings, near exits and alongside exterior walls. Ground movement during an earthquake is seldom the direct cause of death or injury. Christopher Bales, assistant chief of Fire and Emergency Medical Services, DLA Installation Management Richmond, recommends taking the following actions if stuck under debris: Your main goal should be attracting rescue workers and dogs to your location so they can help get you out. Loud noises from high pitch whistles or an air horn can cause the building to start collapsing again.
 If you can reach your cell phone or flashlight, you can create a signal to help speed up your rescue. Light can travel a long way and can be seen quite easily especially by dogs or robotic cameras.
 If you are stuck under a large object or a pile of debris, you should try to avoid any unnecessary movement.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 16, 2001 included in
this Form 10-K into the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-33573,
333-64013 and 333-68173) of New Era of Networks, Inc. It should be noted that we
have not audited any financial statements of New Era of Networks, Inc.
subsequent to December 31, 2000 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to
the date of our report.

                                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado
  March 2, 2001.
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification

In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Distribution Management Services, Inc., Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three-months and six-months ending November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leo Greenfield, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| | /s/ LEOGREENFIELD                   
| | Leo Greenfield,                     
| | CEO, principal executive officer and
| | principal accounting officer        

January 19, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 31.4 EAGLEPICHER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, As Amended I, Shane Dryanski, certify that: 1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of EaglePicher Technologies, LLC; 2.       Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report; 3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report; 4.       The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 5.       The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/ SHANE DRYANSKI
    
    Date: March 14, 2005Shane Dryanski, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014421EN.01005702.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/57

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 September 2014 — Lebedef v Commission

(Case F-118/13) (1)

1

((Civil service - Preliminary issues - Manifest inadmissibility))

2014/C 421/82

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Career Development Report relating to the period from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002 and annulment of the merit points awarded during the 2003 promotion exercise.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Lebedef shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Lebedef shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 52 of 22/02/2014, p. 53.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  report of GiveMePower  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
William V. Walton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to  GiveMePower  Corporation  and will be retained by  GiveMePower
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

Date: February 20, 2007

                                          By: /s/ WILLIAM V. WALTON
                                          -------------------------
                                          William V. Walton
                                          Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-5125.

#### Bill Lietzke, Petitioner v. City of Montgomery, Alabama, et al.

562 U.S. 1026, 131 S. Ct. 555,

178 L. Ed. 2d 410,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8396.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 245, 178 L. Ed. 2d 163, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6341.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32193-32194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15612]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License; Concord 
Circuits

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to Concord Circuits, a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive 
license in the United States to practice the Government owned invention 
described in U.S. Patent No. 5,274,775 entitled ``Process Control 
Apparatus for Executing Program Instructions'' in the fields of digital 
and UNIX/Linex applications.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than August 11, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Office of Naval 
Research, ONR 00CC, Ballston Tower One, 800 North Quincy Street, 
Arlington, Virginia 22217-5660.


[[Page 32194]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. R. J. Erickson, Staff Patent 
Attorney, Office of Naval Research, ONR 00CC, Ballston Tower One, 800 
North Quincy Street, Arlington, Virginia 22217-5660, telephone (703) 
696-4001.

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404)

    Dated: June 2, 1998.
Lou Rae Langevin,
LT, JAGC, USN, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-15612 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
Cite as 2014 Ark. 190

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

I N R E S U P R E M E C O U R T

COMMITTEE ON MODEL JURY

INSTRUCTIONS–CIVIL

Opinion Delivered APRIL 24, 2014

PER CURIAM

Sean T. Keith, Esq., of Rogers, is appointed to the Supreme Court Committee on

Model Jury Instructions–Civil for a three-year term, effective immediately, to expire on

September 30, 2017. The court thanks Mr. Keith for his willingness to serve on this

important committee.

Timothy L. Brooks, Esq., has resigned from the committee after accepting

appointment as a federal judge to the United States District Court for the Western District

of Arkansas. Judge Brooks has served on the committee since July 27, 2011. The court

expresses its sincere appreciation to Judge Brooks for his service to this committee.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16564]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration


Working Group on the Disclosure of the Quality of Care in Health 
Plans Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 
Working Group established by the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare 
and Pension Benefit Plans to study what kind of information on the 
quality of care in health plans should be transmitted to fiduciaries 
and participants and how the information should be transmitted will 
hold an open public meeting on Tuesday, July 7, 1998, in Room N-4437 
C&D, U.S. Department of Labor Building, Second and Constitution Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20210.
    The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 9:30 a.m. to 
approximately noon, is for Working Group members to continue taking 
testimony on the topic.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to the topic by submitting 20 copies on or before July 2, 
1998, to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, 
U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or representatives of organizations 
wishing to address the Working Group should forward their request to 
the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations 
will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement may be 
submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who need 
special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by July 2, at 
the address indicated in this notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before July 2.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of June, 1998.
Olena Berg,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-16564 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
No. 10-429.

#### Joel D. Walker, et ux., Petitioners v. H. L. Cromartie, III, et al.

562 U.S. 1045, 131 S. Ct. 610,

178 L. Ed. 2d 436,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 9000.

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.

Same case below, 287 Ga. 511, 696 S.E.2d 654.
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, Michael Feinsod, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameritrans Capital Corporation;2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 11, 2011/s/ Michael R. Feinsod
Michael R. Feinsod
Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-5845.

#### Michael Maurice Clark, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 939, 131 S. Ct. 352,

178 L. Ed. 2d 228,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7122.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 365.
No. 09-11295.

#### Matthew Brian Boseman, Petitioner v. E. Richard Bazzle, Warden.

562 U.S. 872, 131 S. Ct. 174,

178 L. Ed. 2d 104,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6752.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 796.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick Rodriguez, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 603]

*503Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J. at hearing; Ronald A. Zweibel, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered April 30, 2015, convicting defendant of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

After a sufficient inquiry, the suppression court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s request for new counsel, made as the hearing was about to begin. Contrary to defendant’s assertion, the court did not merely conduct a perfunctory inquiry, but instead allowed defendant to voice his concerns about counsel. Furthermore, while the court advised defendant that he had not made any specific allegations, defendant still provided nothing but vague and generic claims not constituting good cause for substitution of counsel *(see People v Linares,*2 NY3d 507, 511 [2004]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Renwick, J.R, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Kahn and Kern, JJ.