alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16317]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33606]


Minnesota Commercial Railway Company--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--Certain Lines of The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe 
Railway Company

    Minnesota Commercial Railway Company (MC), a Class III rail 
carrier, has filed a notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to 
acquire and operate approximately 5 miles of rail line owned by The 
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF), plus 
incidental trackage rights to reach certain industries and MC's own 
trackage.<SUP>1</SUP> The line is located in Minneapolis, MN, known as 
the Southeast Minneapolis Switching District (SEMSD).<SUP>2</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ MC certifies that its projected revenues will not result in 
the creation of a Class II or Class I rail carrier.
    \2\ BNSF classified the SEMSD as industrial trackage, and, 
consequently, there are no mileposts on the subject trackage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or shortly after 
May 28, 1998.
    If this notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke does not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33606, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Eugenia Langan, Esq., Shea & Gardner, 1800 Massachusetts 
Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20036.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: June 11, 1998.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16317 Filed 6-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Exhibit 10.5



 



EXHIBIT 10.5


SECOND AMENDMENT

TO THE

HARRIS CORPORATION

MASTER RABBI TRUST AGREEMENT




     WHEREAS, HARRIS CORPORATION (the “Company”) and THE NORTHERN TRUST
COMPANY, an Illinois corporation of Chicago, Illinois (the “Trustee”), executed
the Harris Corporation Master Rabbi Trust Agreement (the “Trust”), effective
the 2nd day of December, 2003; and



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Trustee desire to amend the Trust pursuant to
Section 12, such amendment to be effective the 1st day of January, 2005;



     NOW, THEREFORE, Appendix A of the Trust is amended as follows, but all
other sections of the Trust shall remain in full force and effect without
modification.



     1. Amendment. Appendix A shall be amended by adding the following plans
as Participating Plans:




	•	 	Harris Corporation 2005 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan; and
	 
	•	 	Harris Corporation 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.





     2. Effect of Amendment. Except as amended hereby, the Trust shall remain
in full force and effect. This Second Amendment is made for the purposes
described in the recitals hereof, and nothing herein contained shall be
construed as a waiver or modification of existing rights or obligations under
the Trust, as amended. From and after the date hereof reference to the Trust
shall be deemed to be references to the Trust as hereby amended.



1









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Trustee have caused this Second
Amendment to be executed and their respective corporate seals to be affixed and
attested by their respective corporate officers on this 8th day of December,
2004.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	HARRIS CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Charles J. Greene	 
	 	 	Charles J. Greene 	 
	 	 	Assistant Treasurer 	 
	 




ATTEST:





	 	 	Scott T. Mikuen

Corporate Secretary





     The undersigned, Scott T. Mikuen, does hereby certify that he/she is the
duly elected, qualified and acting Corporate Secretary of Harris Corporation
(the “Company”) and further certifies that the person whose signature appears
above is a duly elected, qualified and acting officer of the Company with full
power and authority to execute this Second Amendment on behalf of the Company
and to take such other actions and execute such other documents as may be
necessary to effectuate this Second Amendment. Pursuant to Section 12 of the
Trust, the undersigned further certifies that this Second Amendment does not
conflict with the terms of any Plan as defined in the Trust. The undersigned
further represents that The Northern Trust Company may conclusively rely on
this certification.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Scott T. Mikuen	 	 
	 	 	Scott T. Mikuen 	 
	 	 	Corporate Secretary

Harris Corporation 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Peter R. Sparrow	 
	 	Name:  	Peter R. Sparrow	 
	 	Title:  	Vice President	 
	 




ATTEST:



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Kristen Guggeis	 	 
	 	Name:  Kristen Guggeis	 	 
	 	Title:    Vice President	 	 
	 





2
#### In the Matter of Dock Properties, LLC, et al., Respondents, v Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York et al., Appellants.

[65 NYS3d 444]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard H. Sherman, J.), entered May 6, 2016, which granted petitioners’ motion to vacate and discharge respondents’ recorded notice of lien seeking relocation and administrative costs, and denied respondents’ cross motion to dismiss the *529proceeding, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the cross motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding.

As conceded by petitioners, based on the Court of Appeals’ recent holding in *Rivera v Department of Hous. Preserv.*& *Dev. of the City of N.Y.*(29 NY3d 45 [2017]), this dispute regarding the reasonableness of expenses claimed by respondents in an otherwise facially valid notice of lien must be resolved through a foreclosure trial, rather than a summary discharge proceeding *(see id.*at 50).

Concur—Gische, J.P., Webber, Oing, Singh and Moulton, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1613]



[[Page 3613]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3045]


State of Florida

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 
January 6, 1998, I find that Hernando, Hillsborough, Osceola, and Polk 
Counties in the State of Florida constitute a disaster area due to 
damages caused by severe storms, high winds, tornadoes, and flooding 
beginning on December 25, 1997 and continuing. Applications for loans 
for physical damages may be filed until the close of business on March 
7, 1998, and for loans for economic injury until the close of business 
on October 6, 1998 at the address listed below or other locally 
announced locations: Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 
Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous counties of Brevard, Citrus, 
Hardee, Highlands, Indian River, Lake, Manatee, Okeechobee, Orange, 
Pasco, Pinellas, and Sumter in the State of Florida may be filed until 
the specified date at the above location.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For physical damage:                                                    
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere..................     7.625
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere...............     3.812
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere..................     8.000
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit                
   available elsewhere........................................     4.000
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit               
   available elsewhere........................................     7.125
For economic injury:                                                    
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without                
   credit available elsewhere.................................     4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 304506 
and for economic injury the number is 970500.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: January 9, 1998.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-1613 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. D-2513.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Michael John Romeo.

562 U.S. 810, 131 S. Ct. 400,

178 L. Ed. 2d 265,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7530.

October 4, 2010.

Michael John Romeo, of Birmingham, Alabama, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 09-11493.

#### Shanel Ann Stasz, Petitioner v. Rosendo Gonzalez, Chapter 7 Trustee.

562 U.S. 884, 131 S. Ct. 209,

178 L. Ed. 2d 126,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6785.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 234.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,234,527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,077,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (193,950)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,867,699
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,697,229
<PP&E>                                       2,075,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                (82,159)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,661,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,811,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       327,333
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,407,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,661,982
<SALES>                                     10,744,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,744,121
<CGS>                                        8,767,101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,767,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,211,891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (274,603)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (36,595)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (238,008)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (238,008)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2179

To amend the Revenue Act of 1987 to provide a permanent extension of

the transition rule for certain publicly traded partnerships.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. PACKWOOD (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, and Mr. HATCH) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Revenue Act of 1987 to provide a permanent

extension of the transition rule for certain publicly traded

partnerships.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF TRANSITION RULE

4 FOR CERTAIN PUBLICLY TRADED PARTNER5 SHIPS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section

7 10211(c) of the Revenue Act of 1987 (Public Law 100–

8 203) is amended to read as follows:

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning
2

•S 2179 IS

1 after December 31, 1987, except that such amend2 ments shall not apply to any existing partnership.’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 this section shall take effect as if included in the provisions

5 of section 10211 of the Revenue Act of 1987.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33952-33953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-2-34,400]


Apocalypse Inc.; Ellenville, NY; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, and investigation 
was initiated on April 6, 1998, in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at Apocalypse Inc., Ellenville, New 
York.

[[Page 33953]]

    The subject firm closed in March of 1997. The Department has been 
unable to locate principals of the firm or otherwise obtain information 
to reach a determination on worker eligibility. Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 12th day of June, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-16557 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           53430
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1708212
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    2784515
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         2312447
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           2358553
<LOANS>                                       34380142
<ALLOWANCE>                                     154199
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                43216438
<DEPOSITS>                                    30044475
<SHORT-TERM>                                   6400000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             450681
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3968
<OTHER-SE>                                     6317314
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                43216438
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                2623857
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               358584
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 87282
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               3069723
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1562329
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1817719
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1252004
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    75000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 842833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 388676
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      388676
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    244452
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .041
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    302000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                151868
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    78002
<RECOVERIES>                                      5333
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               154199
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         154199
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-5293.

#### Jerry L. Maske, Petitioner v. City of Aurora, Colorado.

562 U.S. 913, 131 S. Ct. 272,

178 L. Ed. 2d 179,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6793.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
No. 09-9187.

#### Leobarda B. Barraza, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 842, 131 S. Ct. 67,

178 L. Ed. 2d 48,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5990.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 576 F.3d 798.
<Page>


---------------------------------
                             MANN
---------------------------------                  12 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1202
                        FRANKFORT
---------------------------------                      Houston, Texas 77046-1289
                          STEIN &
---------------------------------                                 (713) 561-6500
                             LIPP
---------------------------------                            FAX: (713) 968-7128
     Certified Public Accountants
  A Limited Liability Partnership



                                                               EXHIBIT 16.1

  May 15, 2002



  Securities and Exchange Commission
  450 Fifth Street, N.W.
  Washington, D.C.  20549


  Gentlemen:

  We have read the statements made by CYNET, Inc. contained in Item 8 of
  Form 10-KSB for the event that occurred effective April 22, 2002.  We
  agree with the statements in response to that item concerning our Firm.


  Very truly yours,


  /s/ MANN FRANKFORT STEIN & LIPP CPAs, L.L.P.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of A. L

. , a child

, * From the 32 6th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 9 5 6 9

- CX

.

No. 11

- 20

- 00 0 9 4

- C V * September 1 7 , 20 20

* Memorand um Opinion by Bailey, C. J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

( Willson , J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, the

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Glen Johnson, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 688]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J. at plea and sentencing; Marcy L. Kahn, J. at resentencing), rendered May 7, 2013, as amended September 23, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of stalking in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of two to four years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant did not preserve his claim that his guilty plea was involuntary and unknowing because the promised sentence was unlawful *(see People v Williams,*27 NY3d 212 [2016]), and *514we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal. Defendant successfully moved under CPL 440.20 to have his unlawful sentence of three years replaced by a lawful sentence of two to four years. Even assuming, without deciding, that defendant would have been entitled to withdraw his plea (the remedy he requests on appeal), he expressly declined that remedy at resentencing.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick and Moulton, JJ.
No. 10-6230.

#### Christopher Reed, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 972, 131 S. Ct. 485,

178 L. Ed. 2d 307,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7970.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 396 Ill. App. 3d 636, 336 Ill. Dec. 181, 919 N.E.2d 1106.
#### In the Matter of Aetna Inc., Petitioner, v New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal et al., Respondents.

[61 NYS3d 885]

Decision of respondent New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal, dated June 3, 2016, which reinstated Notices of Disallowance for petitioner’s New York City General Corporation Tax (GCT) returns for the calendar years 2005 and 2006, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding, commenced in this Court pursuant to CPLR 506 (b) (4) and article 78, dismissed, without costs.

The Tribunal’s decision that under the relevant statutory scheme, petitioner’s subsidiary health maintenance organizations were subject to the GCT during the period in issue is rational and supported by substantial evidence, and is thus entitled to deference (see *Matter of National Bulk Carriers Inc. & Affiliates v New York City Tax Appeals Trib.,*61 AD3d 522 [1st Dept 2009], *lv denied*12 NY3d 716 [2009]).

Concur— Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Webber, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00610-CR

Damion Navarro

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

2nd 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 129-13-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 3, 2015
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-18-2005

In Re: Gen Datacomm

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 04-1710

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Gen Datacomm " (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 1087.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/1087
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

GENERAL DATACOMM

INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

JAMES R. ARCARA et al.,

Appellees.

No. 04-1710

ORDER AMENDING THE OPINION

May___, 2005.

It is hereby ORDERED that the concurring opinion in the above-captioned case shall be

amended such that the last sentence of the concurring opinion shall read: “Accordingly, I concur in

judgment of the court, subject to the small reservation noted in footnote 14, supra.” 

 Louis H. Pollak, J 

Dated: May 18, 2005