alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Distribution Europe employee named in DLA top 10

/ Published March 15, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Juan Morales Martinez was selected as one of the Defense Logistics Agency’s Top 10 DLA Employees of the Year, as part of the agency’s 55th Annual Employee Recognition Awards. In addition to an award, Martinez also received a signed note from the DLA Director, Navy Vice Adm. Michelle M. Skubic, commending him for his commitment and dedication to the agency.

Morales Martinez was selected to be part of this distinguished group for his solid contributions in the theater shipping and consolidation point for the mission at DLA Distribution in Europe. Morales Martinez independently shouldered 80% of the container loading operations at DDDE and expedited the customs inspections process for materials destined for overseas, loading 315 containers with zero issues from ports or customs.

Morales Martinez managed work in process in the over ocean container section, including managing the prioritization of the work. Due to his meticulous efforts, ship times for over ocean material dropped by 20%. A true leader and team player, any difficult task that needs to be accomplished, he is always there to help out. He leads by example which encourages his peers to show the same level of commitment to the mission. 

“Juan is a value added team member who is relied upon heavily and respected by all. We are proud of him, his achievements, and grateful that his work ethic and contributions are being recognized through this prestigious award”, stated DDDE Commanding Officer, Army Lt. Col. Kimberly Rembert. 

It has been a notable year for Morales Martinez. Earlier this year, he was selected by the National Institute Packaging Handling Logistics Engineers with their Handling Achievement Award for 2022. When asked to comment on his recent significant personal awards, per his character, he deflects and says they were really team awards and he is just part of a team.
# C_2015034EN.01003402.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2014 — Netherlands Maritime Technology Association v Commission

(Case T-140/13) (1)

1

((State aid - Spanish scheme of early depreciation of certain assets acquired through financial leasing - Decision finding no State aid - Formal investigation procedure not initiated - Serious difficulties - Circumstances and length of the preliminary examination - Insufficient and incomplete examination))

(2015/C 034/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Netherlands Maritime Technology Association, formerly Scheepsbouw Nederland (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Struckmann, lawyer, and G. Forwood, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Afonso, L. Flynn and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by N. Díaz Abad and A. Sampol Pucurull, abogados del Estado)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission Decision of 20 November 2012 relating to State aid SA 34736 (12/N) concerning the implementation by the Kingdom of Spain of a tax scheme permitting the early depreciation of certain assets acquired through financial leasing.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action as being unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action as being unfounded;

| 2) | Orders Netherlands Maritime Technology Association to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Netherlands Maritime Technology Association to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3) | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

QUDRE MCMILLAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 389 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                       0
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Andrea Cortes, Respondent, v Alfred Donaldson et al., Appellants.

[47 NYS3d 911]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated December 21, 2015, which denied their motion for summary judgment *772dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injury to the cervical region of the plaintiff’s spine did not constitute a serious injury under either the permanent consequential limitation of use or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Staff v Yshua,*59 AD3d 614 [2009]).

In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a serious injury to the cervical region of her spine under the permanent consequential limitation of use and significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Rivera, J.R, Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Elizabeth A. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Elizabeth A. Murphy


Elizabeth A. Murphy
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2002
No. 09-1539.

#### Daniel Ray Wilkes, Petitioner v. Indiana.

562 U.S. 981, 131 S. Ct. 414,

178 L. Ed. 2d 321,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8144.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana denied.

Same case below, 917 N.E.2d 675.
No. 10-5167.

#### Alberto Duncan, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 907, 131 S. Ct. 253,

178 L. Ed. 2d 167,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7404.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 250.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33940-33941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Government-Owned Inventions; Availability for Licensing: Novel 
Antitumor Macrocyclic Lactones, Compositions and Methods of Use

AGENCY: National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, DHHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institutes of Health is seeking licensees for the 
further development, evaluation and commercialization of materials and 
methods for novel cancer treatment agents. The invention claimed in 
DHHS Reference No. E-244-97/0, ``Novel Antitumor Macrocyclic Lactones, 
Compositions and Methods of Use,'' (Boyd, M. et al.) filed on 29 June 
1997 as USSN 60/053,784, is available for licensing (in accordance with 
35 USC 207 and 37 CFR Part 404).

ADDRESSES: Questions about the licensing opportunity should be 
addressed to Girish C. Barua, Ph.D., Office of Technology Transfer, 
National Institutes of Health, 6011 Executive Boulevard, Suite 325, 
Rockville, Maryland 20852-3804; Telephone: 301/496-7056 ext. 263; Fax: 
301/402-0220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The invention relates to a series of 
macrocyclic lactones based on compounds isolated from certain marine 
sponges and tunicates. These compounds have in vitro activity against 
certain human solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer, renal 
cancer and melanoma, all important killers which are resistant to 
currently used drugs.
    Of particular interest is the cell-line activity profile of these 
lactones, which indicates a novel mechanism of action. Such compounds 
hold the promise of in

[[Page 33941]]

vivo activities unlike those seen with current drugs. These lactones 
thus have the potential for use as therapeutics alone or in combination 
with existing drugs.
    Information about the patent application and pertinent information 
not yet publicly described can be obtained under a Confidential 
Disclosure Agreement. Respondees interested in licensing the invention 
will be required to submit an Application for License to Public Health 
Service Inventions.

    Dated: June 16, 1998.
Jack Spiegel,
Director, Division of Technology Development and Transfer, Office of 
Technology Transfer.
[FR Doc. 98-16425 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
2017-0637.

#### State ex rel. Sheets v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-22, 2017-Ohio-1169.
# C_2015073EN.01002401.xml

| 2.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2015 — Sabores de Navarra v OHIM — Frutas Solano (KIT, EL SABOR DE NAVARRA)

(Case T-46/13) (1)

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark KIT, EL SABOR DE NAVARRA - Earlier Community figurative mark Sabores de Navarra La Sabiduría del Sabor - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 15 and Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Form differing in elements which alter the distinctive character of the mark)

(2015/C 073/31)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Sabores de Navarra, AIE (Pamplona, Spain) (represented by: J. Calderón Chavero, O. González Fernández and L. Estropa Navarro, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Frutas Solano, SA (Calahorra, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 November 2012 (Joined Cases R 2542/2011-2 and R 2550/2011-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Sabores de Navarra, AIE and Frutas Solano, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sabores de Navarra, AIE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sabores de Navarra, AIE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.

---
# Collaborating to bring WMS online

/ Published May 10, 2023
Battle Creek, Mich., 
The Defense Logistics Agency’s transition to the Warehouse Management System is fully underway at DLA Disposition Services field sites worldwide.

The agency is rolling out WMS on a site-by-site basis – making sure each site is spun up on proper operations of the system. The modernization started in San Antonio, Texas, and is currently implemented at six sites.

This undertaking requires multiple Disposition Services collaborating to aid the transition process. As each location goes online there is a specialized team sent to teach and train the site’s workforce on WMS operations.

“From an information technology perspective – we have our software folks from J6 [information technology],” said Liberty Moore, a line of effort owner with the WMS team.  “We also have J6 hardware folks that are helping us with the new technology of the tablets and the scanners and the new printers. We have our training folks that have been embedded with us since we began this project which is great because they’ve learned the system right along with us and they are the expert teachers.”

Having technical support on-hand as each site goes online benefits the users on the ground and makes it easier for them to get immediate assistance in the event issues come up during this training period. 

“We can help onsite with anything technical,” said Carol Hemker, a Disposition Services IT specialist from Battle Creek, Michigan. “If for some reason the receipt you’re trying to print didn’t go through we have to find out if it got caught up somewhere. So, what we have to look at is making sure the interfaces are working together properly.”

Having reinforcements co-located with those learning WMS operations for the first time is proving to create a smooth and seamless transition from the Distribution Standard Service to WMS according to some who have experienced previous operational changes in the agency.

“I think that this has been a better transition – in my opinion – than all the ones I’ve witnessed before,” said DSD West Director, Kathy Atkins-Nunez, who has been with the agency for 39 years. “I’ve never seen it where the J6 and J1 [training] teams that are needed are coming to the field. I think it’s very important that it was done in this manner. I think it is the best transition I’ve seen in the agency.

DLA continues to bring WMS online, as each Disposition Services and Distribution field site is scheduled to operate under the new system by 2025.

The Susquehanna and Barstow field sites are the next Disposition Services sites that can expect to make the transition.
No. 10-5717.

#### LaDavid B. Taylor, Petitioner v. Richard A. Gunnels, et al.

562 U.S. 965, 131 S. Ct. 464,

178 L. Ed. 2d 295,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7987.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 469.
Exhibit No. 32.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of Questar Gas Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Alan K. Allred, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and S. E. Parks, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR GAS COMPANY    May 7, 2008 /s/Alan K. Allred Alan K. Allred President and Chief Executive Officer    May 7, 2008 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016371EN.01003501.xml

| 10.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/35

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 August 2016 — Boyd v Commission

(Case F-19/13) (1)

1

(2016/C 371/42)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 27/4/2013, p. 30.

1

---
No. 10-5982.

#### Angel Wilfredo Ponciano, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 943, 131 S. Ct. 364,

178 L. Ed. 2d 235,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7560.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 369.
No. 10-5861.

#### Anthony Wayne Johnson, Jr., Petitioner v. Carolyn Turchin, Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of California.

562 U.S. 939, 131 S. Ct. 395,

178 L. Ed. 2d 228,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7595.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. D-2528.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Robert G. Udell.

562 U.S. 812, 131 S. Ct. 403,

178 L. Ed. 2d 268,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7630.

October 4, 2010.

Robert G. Udell, of Stuart, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 10-6226.

#### Darryl Taylor, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 972, 131 S. Ct. 485,

178 L. Ed. 2d 307,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8060.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 604 F.3d 1011.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------



         THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION IS PROVIDED BY THE UNDERSIGNED CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CLARK/BARDES, INC. ON THE BASIS OF SUCH OFFICER'S KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clark/Bardes, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Thomas M.
Pyra, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Thomas M. Pyra
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:    Thomas M. Pyra
                                       Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                          and Chief Operating Officer
                                       Date: May 15, 2003


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-5990.

#### Eddie Cosey, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 943, 131 S. Ct. 364,

178 L. Ed. 2d 235,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7173.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 943.