alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                                CERTIFICATIONS OF
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of GPS Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Robert
C. Silzer, hereby certify in my capacity as President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:  December 1, 2005          By:  /s/ Robert C. Silzer
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Robert C. Silzer
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer



     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of GPS Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, George
Dorin, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated: December 1, 2005                By: /s/ Michael Martin
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Michael Martin
                                       Title: Chief Accounting Officer
Decided June 6, 2017

#### Annarae I., Matter of (Jennifer K.)

3d Dept: 148 AD3d 1243

denied
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2454 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2454

   To make technical corrections to an Act preempting State economic 
                     regulation of motor carriers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 22 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

  Mrs. Murray introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make technical corrections to an Act preempting State economic 
                     regulation of motor carriers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Intrastate Motor Carrier 
Transportation Technical Corrections Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

    Section 11501(h)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking out ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (A);
            (2) by striking out the period at the end of subparagraph 
        (B) and inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(C) does not apply to the transportation of garbage and 
        refuse;
            ``(D) does not apply to the transportation of recyclable 
        materials, as defined under section 10733(b), pursuant to 
        programs conducted under the auspices of any unit of 
        government; and
            ``(E) does not apply to motor carriers providing tow or 
        wrecker services.''.
                                 <all>
```
Second Department,

June, 2017

(June 1, 2017)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Bahar Ansari, on Behalf of Shapele Clarke, Petitioner, v Joseph *667Ponte, Respondent.

[52 NYS3d 910]

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to reduce bail upon Kings County indictment No. 7613/16.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of reducing bail on Kings County indictment No. 7613/16 to the sum of $25,000, which may be posted in the form of an insurance company bail bond in that sum or by depositing the sum of $10,000 as a cash bail alternative; and it is further,

Ordered that upon receipt of a copy of this decision, order and judgment together with proof that the defendant has given an insurance company bail bond in the sum of $25,000 or has deposited the sum of $10,000 as a cash bail alternative, the Warden of the facility at which the defendant is incarcerated, or his or her agent, is directed to immediately release the defendant.

Leventhal, J.P., Hall, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.
#### Tomer Dafna, Appellant, v Shahriar Homapour, Also Known as Charlie Homapour, et al., Respondents, et al., Nominal Defendant.

[61 NYS3d 235]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to a partnership interest, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), dated April 21, 2015, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the fourth and ninth causes of action as barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the fourth and ninth causes of action as barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel. “The party seeking to invoke collateral estoppel has the burden to show the identity of the issues, while the party trying to avoid application of the doctrine must establish the lack of a full and fair opportunity to litigate” *(Matter of Dunn,*24 NY3d 699, 704 [2015]; *see Kaufman v Eli Lilly & Co.,*65 NY2d 449, 456 [1985]; *Mew Equity, LLC v Sutton Land Servs., LLC,*144 AD3d 872, 874 [2016]). Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the defendants satisfied their burden by demonstrating that the subject causes of action are identical to causes of action raised in a prior action brought by the plaintiff’s partner, the nominal defendant Guy Iber, which were dismissed on the merits as barred by the statute of frauds. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating that he did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues in the prior action (see *Mew Equity, LLC v Sutton Land Servs., LLC,*144 AD3d at 874).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions either are improperly raised for the first time in his reply brief on appeal or need not *497be reached in light of our determination.

Balkin, J.P., Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1846

ELLEN PRITCHARD, formerly known as Ellen

Evans,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-99-395-3-17)

Submitted: December 15, 2000 Decided: February 7, 2001

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles L. Griffin, III, Kristi F. Curtis, BRYAN, BAHNMULLER,

GOLDMAN & MCELVEEN, L.L.P., Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellant.

J.R. Murphy, J.J. Gentry, MURPHY & GRANTLAND, P.A., Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ellen Pritchard, formerly Ellen Evans, appeals the district

court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Defendant and

denying her motion for reconsideration on her claims of false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and defamation. The cause of action was removed to district court based on

diversity of citizenship. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion de novo. See Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de

Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir. 1988). Finding no

reversible error, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

See Pritchard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. CA-99-395-3-17 (D.S.C.

May 26, 2000).

We review the denial of the motion for reconsideration for

abuse of discretion. United States v. Holland, 214 F.3d 523, 527

(4th Cir. 2000); Collison v. International Chem. Workers Union, 34

F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir. 1994). When the motion raises no new

arguments, but merely requests the district court to reconsider a

legal issue or to “change its mind,” relief is not authorized.

United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). We

have reviewed the record as to the motion for reconsideration and

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
3

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-5255.

#### Charles Hobbs, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 911, 131 S. Ct. 266,

178 L. Ed. 2d 175,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6802.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Jimenez, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 512]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), rendered June 24, 2014, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The evidence was legally sufficient to establish that the injury inflicted by defendant when he slashed the victim across the face with a box cutter caused serious disfigurement, thereby satisfying the serious physical injury element of first-degree assault *(see People v McKinnon,*15 NY3d 311, 315-316 [2010]). The People presented evidence that the victim sustained a laceration to the right side of his face that ran from his forehead to his jaw, and that the laceration resulted in a permanent scar, which the jury observed. “[V]iewed as a whole, and especially considering the prominent location of the wound on the face, [the evidence] support [s] the inference that at the time of trial the scarf ] remained seriously disfiguring under the *McKinnon*standard” *(People v Coote,*110 AD3d 485, 485 [1st Dept 2013], *lv denied*22 NY3d 1198 [2014]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,260
<INVENTORY>                                      1,738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,201
<PP&E>                                         710,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                 349,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 438,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,809
<BONDS>                                        101,147
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       118,442
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   438,198
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               261,775
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  197,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,371
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,329
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31198-31199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Bear Creek Watershed, Winneshiek and Allamakee Counties, IA and 
Houston and Fillmore Counties, MN

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council of Environmental Quality Regulations 
(40 CFR Part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Regulations (7 CFR Part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Gives notice that an 
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the Bear Creek 
Watershed, Winneshiek and Allamakee Counties,, Iowa and Houston and 
Fillmore Counties, Minnesota.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leroy Brown, State conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, 210 Walnut Street, Suite 693, Des Moines, Iowa, 50309-2180, 
telephone 515/284-4260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, Leroy Brown, State Conservationist, has 
determined that the preparation and review of an environmental impact 
statement are not needed for this project.
    The project purposes are flood control and watershed protection. 
The planned works of improvement included 52 floodwater retarding dams, 
land treatment and accelerated technical assistance for land treatment.
    The Notice of a Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been 
forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency and to various 
Federal, State, and local agencies and interested parties. A limited 
number of copies of the FONSI are available to fill single copy 
requests at the above address. Basic data developed during the 
environmental assessment are on file and may be reviewed by contacting 
Leroy Brown.

[[Page 31199]]

    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be 
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.
Dennis J. Pate,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 98-15080 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
# DLA military members earn top awards for 1st Quarter 2022

/ Published Jan. 31, 2022
Richmond, Va. , 
Three Defense Logistics Agency Aviation military members earned top military awards for the 1st quarter of 2022:  Marine Corps Staff Sgt. Brian Skeens was recognized as DLA Aviation’s Non-commissioned Officer of the Quarter; Army Chief Warrant Officer 3 Narciso Rivas Prieto as DLA Aviation’s Field Grade Officer of the Quarter; and Air Force Lieutenant Michael A. Ellis as the DLA Aviation’s Company Grade Officer of the Quarter.

When endorsing these service members nomination packages, DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. David Sanford praised their high-level of performance, commitment to mission and desire for personal and professional growth. 

In his supporting comments to the nominations, Air Force Col. Daniel Willison, director of Customer Operations for DLA Aviation highlighted Skeens’ leadership ability both professionally in filling two billets, one as a customer account specialist and one as weapon system program manager while volunteering and mentoring the Richmond Kickers youth soccer development program in Richmond Virginia.

Rivas, who was promoted to Chief Warrant Officer 4 Jan. 1, filled two roles during the nomination period;  Strategic Readiness Officer and Tactical Readiness Officer in the Army Customer Facing Division. Rivas is also the lead representative to Army Materiel Command and Army Aviation and Missile Command in Huntsville, Alabama, regarding advanced manufacturing and supply chain visualization tools for Defense Logistics Agency Aviation.

Sanford said Ellis is an exemplary company grade officer in every aspect. During the nomination period, as an Air Force Logistics Career Broadening officer assigned to DLA Aviation, Ellis’ duties included serving as the Bradley Fighting Vehicle System demand plan lead and helping identify new parts sources for the Air Force B-52 Stratofortress bomber, and serving as project lead for the DLA Aviation Senior Leader Conference while working on his doctorate degree and pursuing his Life Cycle Logistics Level I certifications.

Each DLA Aviation service member will go on to compete in their categories at the DLA Headquarters level.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16235]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.

    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAMS SEP 
Clinical Trial B.
    Date: July 9, 1998.
    Time: 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Aftab A. Ansari, PHD, NIAMS, 45 Center Drive, 
5AS 25U.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAMS SEP 
Eisenberg Supplement.
    Date: July 15, 1998.
    Time: 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Natcher Bldg, Bethesda, MD 20892-6400 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Aftab A. Ansari, PHD, NIAMS 45 Center Drive, 5AS 
25U.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-16235 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5872 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5872

**Commission Decision of 14/06/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5872 - WARBURG PINCUS / POUNDLAND) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 14.6.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/8319

C(2010) 4134

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5872 - WARBURG PINCUS/ POUNDLAND Notification of 07/05/2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 129, 19/05/2010, p. 11.

1. On 07/05/2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Warburg Pincus & Co. ("Warburg Pincus", USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Poundland Holdings Limited ("Poundland", UK) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

• for Warburg Pincus: private equity investor;

• for Poundland: retail sales of daily consumer goods.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
[LETTERHEAD OF THE SINGING MACHINE]

                                                                   July 13, 2004

To      Maureen LaRoche
        Tel:  603-286-8791
        Fax: 603-286-9548

SUBJECT:   SMC WIRING INFORMATION

Dear Maureen,

Per Jay Bauer's instruction, I have attached the wiring instruction for loan of
$200,000 to The Singing Machine Company Inc. (SMC) by investors identified by
Jay Bauer.

On behalf of SMC, we have agreed to pay 8.75% annual interest rate plus any
expense associated with the transaction. We understand that this is a short term
and SMC has agreed to repay the loan as soon as cash flow has improved or as an
advance against the expected tax refund of $1.1MM from IRS.

Please give us a call if there is any question.


Best regards,

/s/ Y.P. Chan                           /s/ Jeffrey Barocas
Y.P. Chan                               Jeffery Barocas
Interim CEO and COO                     CFO


                    Total number of pages including cover: 2

Cc:        Jay Bauer   Fax: 212-921-9454