alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED) FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 AND CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (394)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,358
<PP&E>                                           8,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,314)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,186
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,352
<SALES>                                         79,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,430
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,809
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,943
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,943
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43


</TABLE>
#### Com. v. Jackson

11/10/2015

357 EAL *(2015)*

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 446
No. 10-5351.

#### William Larry Weaver, Petitioner v. Steve Bullock, Attorney General of Montana, et al.

562 U.S. 916, 131 S. Ct. 282,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6944.

178 L. Ed. 2d 185,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 869.
No. 10-5085.

#### Corey Louis Hines, Petitioner v. Marty C. Anderson, et al.

562 U.S. 903, 131 S. Ct. 238,

178 L. Ed. 2d 159,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6320.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# DLA Hall of Fame nominations due Jan. 16

/ Published Dec. 7, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Current and former Defense Logistics Agency employees have until Jan. 16 to nominate former employees for the 2024 DLA Hall of Fame. Former agency civilians and military members of any grade or rank, living or deceased, can be nominated.

Nominees must have been separated from DLA for at least three years by the nomination deadline, and nominations must be endorsed by the commander or deputy of a major subordinate command or directorate.

Nomination must include:
      - The nomination form with general information on the nominee and the submitting employee.
      - A narrative description of specific contributions that qualify the nominee for Hall of Fame recognition.
      - A proposed citation for the Hall of Fame brochure and website.
      - Supporting documents such as published articles, manuals and reports.
      - At least five photos of the nominee performing their DLA duties or other official activities.
      - The name of the organization’s point of contact for coordinating nominations.

Nominations will be evaluated on the individual’s contributions to the agency. Those selected for induction, or the next of kin if the selectee is deceased, will be notified in writing.

Nomination forms are available in the document shared below and should be sent to honoraryawardsub@dla.mil. For more information, contact Bach Dang at 571-767-0692 or bach.dang@dla.mil or Laura Belk at 571-767-5389 or laura.belk@dla.mil.

An induction ceremony is tentatively scheduled for May 16.
No. 10-5429.

#### Clinton L. Patrick, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 921, 131 S. Ct. 295,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7228.

178 L. Ed. 2d 194,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District, denied.

Same case below, 394 Ill. App. 3d 1114, 369 Ill. Dec. 98, 985 N.E.2d 1084.
No. 10-53.

#### Brendan Dolan, et al., Petitioners v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, et al.

562 U.S. 891, 131 S. Ct. 261,

178 L. Ed. 2d 139,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6343.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 365 Fed. Appx. 271.
# Defense Supply Center Richmond gets a facelift

/ Published Aug. 7, 2020
RICHMOND, Va., 
Changes are taking place on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, in the form of renovations and upgrades to several facilities.

Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management at Richmond is responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of all the buildings and land located on center.

“All of our buildings are on established maintenance schedules, which means that we don’t wait for something to go wrong before we fix it,” said Jimmy Parrish, chief, Environmental Management Division, DLA Installation Management Richmond. “However, if something is discovered that needs to be immediately fixed prior to the scheduled maintenance, a work order is submitted, and the repairs are completed.”

The Commonwealth of Virginia has deemed DSCR as a historic site and as such, preservation of the property is an ongoing effort.

“As a historic district, the Department of Historic Resources must approve any work we decide to have done to any of our structures,” Parrish said. “As such, keeping our buildings well-maintained just helps to prevent future challenges and keeps the buildings looking good. Which is something that we are very proud of.”

Parrish said some of the work already completed includes, work done to the wooden frieze boards (a type of trim that is typically installed between the top of a home's siding and the soffit), fascia, gable vent, and wooden belly board on the eastern and western sides of Building 34.

According to Parrish, many of these wooden belly boards had rotted away over the years and families of bats had made their home in the narrow openings near the gable vents.  As a result, many of the boards had to be replaced, repaired and/ or repainted. The bat droppings also had to be removed. The sidewalks adjacent to both the east- and west-side entrances of Building 34 have also been replaced.

In addition extensive work has been done repairing any damaged mortar and brickwork around center.

Parrish said while the coronavirus pandemic has drastically limited the amount of people physically working on center, keeping the center up and running has continued full speed.

“With less people on center, our contractors are able to move about more easily and more efficiently,” he said.

According to Parrish, maintaining the installation is no different than maintaining a home. If you don’t stay on top of things, they will get worse over time.

In addition to the work already completed, he said fiscal 2021 promises to be just as busy with work being done to the Bellwood Club, Bldgs. 70, 201, 41 and 103, better known as the Little Red School House.

Parrish said those working on center will also see Bldg. 37 restored to its original 1941 appearance, as well as the expansion of The Visitor’s Center customer/visitor sign-in area located inside Building 210.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72172-72173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28662]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION: Notice of an Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the 
Export-Import Bank of the United States.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND PLACE: Thursday, December 11, 2014 at 3:00 p.m. The meeting 
will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1126, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20571.

OPEN AGENDA ITEMS: Item No. 1 Ex-Im Bank Advisory Committee for 2015 
(New Members)

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public observation 
for Item No. 1 only.

FURTHER INFORMATION: Members of the public who wish to attend the 
meeting

[[Page 72173]]

should call Joyce Stone, Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20571 (202) 565-3336 by close of business Tuesday, 
December 9, 2014.

Lloyd Ellis,
Program Specialist, Office of the General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-28662 Filed 12-3-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
# Data pull project introduces standardization to Cherry Point sustainment team

/ Published April 27, 2022
Richmond, Va., 
One of the best ways to measure the success of any project is to analyze the data generated by that project. Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Cherry Point, North Carolina, sustainment support specialists within the Planning and Support Division are dedicated to delivering supportability analysis, ensuring warfighter support success and a continuous process improvement project focused on improving data pulls has provided them with a better tool for doing just that.

Sustainment specialists at Cherry Point completed a CPI project that has helped reduce data retrieval time by 95% and introduced a standardized data retrieval and organization process.

“Process standardization is critical,” said Kevin Jones, a Planning and Support Division sustainment support specialist. “To effectively process the sustainment workflow and make the best decisions for our customers, we need a lot of information, and it needs to be as up-to-date as possible.”

Jones said because the sustainment field is a hybrid of demand and material planning, the team requires data that both fields use. Prior to standardizing the process, sustainment support specialists spent an average of four hours each month per cycle pulling data. The process improvement has reduced that time to just 12 minutes per cycle.

While other projects were considered, Jones said the CPI team came to an agreement to standardize the monthly sustainment data-pull process “because there were several issues sustainment specialists had in common such as having to pull data from multiple platforms. The results would have the greatest positive impact for DLA Aviation at Cherry Point and the level of support we were providing for our customers at Fleet Readiness Center East.”

Standardization is critical because of the sheer amount of information required to effectively process the sustainment workflow.

Jones said without a platform dedicated solely to sustainment, team members had to work from several web-based information systems, some of which required multiple queries to complete a report.

“Another positive outcome of this discussion [CPI event] was the opportunity to learn more about our partners’ planning processes,” Jones said.

Implementation of the monthly sustainment data-pull process at other industrial support activities is a future initiative to expand the capability beyond DLA Aviation at Cherry Point.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose R., Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 808]—

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered May 18, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Oing and Singh, JJ.
No. 10-5145.

#### John P. Nichols, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 906, 131 S. Ct. 249,

178 L. Ed. 2d 165,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7425.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 546.
# DLA lauded for maximizing communication technology for disabled employees

/ Published Nov. 18, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency has received a coveted technology award given to Defense Department components for achievements in employing individuals with disabilities.

In an Oct. 7 ceremony at the Pentagon, DLA was given the “Award for Achievement in Ensuring Accessible Information and Communication Technology in the Workplace” in addition to winning the “Best Mid-sized Component for the Achievement on Employment of Individuals with Disabilities” for the fifth year in a row.

“DLA employees should be proud that they are members of a high-performing team that demonstrates everyday its dedication to teamwork and excellence,” said Richard Harmon, DLA’s chief of enterprise IT accessibility. “This award recognizes our collective commitment to create an environment of maximum inclusion and valued diversity.”

Harmon said DLA’s commitment to accessibility is evident in the software tools it provides for contracting officers as well as web-based content that’s available for all employees. DLA Information Operations also ensures employees have access to assistive technology tools such as Dragon Naturally Speaking, Job Access with Speech and ZoomText.

“At DLA, we proactively and collaboratively work with stakeholders to maximize the accessibility of our information and communication technology to our entire user community,” said Peter Apgar, a program analyst in enterprise IT accessibility. “We are responsive to our customers and quickly address any issues they may encounter, and as an organization we are driven to provide excellence. Our customers are our focus.”

C.J. Johnson, director of the DOD Diversity Management Operations Center, said during the presentation that adaptive and accessible solutions such as telework, virtual meetings and verbal description are relatively new concepts to most DOD employees. Such tools have been used daily by individuals with disabilities for many years, however.

“These are all examples of how the ingenuity of the disability community has improved the workplace for all DOD employees,” he said.
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION


   I, Cedric Kushner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors:

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.


         Date: October 6, 2005     /s/ Cedric Kushner
                                   ------------------
                                   Cedric Kushner
                                   Chief Executive Officer
162 A.3d 1073

#### IN THE MATTER OF PAUL F. CLAUSEN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 015951982)

June 21, 2017

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-213, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to *Rule*1:20—4(f) (default by respondent), that PAUL F. CLAUSEN of CLINTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be censured for violating *RPC*1.4(b)(failure to communicate with client), and *RPC*8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PAUL F. CLAUSEN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
Promissory Note


$_________                                             Date:___________
                                                       Due: ___________


     On the sooner to occur of the initial  public  offering of the common stock
of Compu-Dawn, Inc. or thirty (30) months after the date hereof the undersigned,
for value received,  promises to pay to the order of Mark Honigsfeld at 969 East
End, Woodmere, New York, the sum of $__________,  payable in eight (8) quarterly
installments of $________, the first installment due _________, with interest at
the rate of 10% per annum from the date hereof,  payable quarterly commencing on
___________, on the principal remaining unpaid.

     This  note  evidences  an  indebtedness  incurred  under a loan  commitment
agreement  dated January 21, 1997 between the  undersigned,  therein  called the
Borrower,  and the payee,  therein called the Lender, to which reference is made
for a statement of the terms and  conditions  under which  installments  of this
note  may be  paid  prior  to the due  date  and  under  which  the due  date of
installments may be accelerated.

     Presentation  and demand for  payment,  notice of  dishonor,  protest,  and
notice of protest are hereby waived.


                                                  COMPU-DAWN, INC.


                                                  By:___________________________






<PAGE>
#### Com. v. Harris

12/16/2015

400 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1121
No. 10-5865.

#### Leslie Love, Petitioner v. Claude Chester, Warden.

562 U.S. 940, 131 S. Ct. 353,

178 L. Ed. 2d 229,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7255.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 766.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2237

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to strengthen the criminal

offenses and penalties for the smuggling of aliens.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 23 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to strengthen

the criminal offenses and penalties for the smuggling

of aliens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alien Smuggling Act

5 of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR SMUGGLING.

7 (a) STRENGTHENING OF SMUGGLING OFFENSE.—

8 Section 274(a)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)(A)) is amended to read as fol10 lows:
2

•S 2237 IS

1 ‘‘(A) knowing that a person is an alien—

2 ‘‘(i) brings to or attempts to bring to the

3 United States, in any manner whatsoever or at

4 any place whatsoever, such person (other than

5 a person who has received prior official author6 ization to come to, enter, or reside in the Unit7 ed States), knowing or in reckless disregard of

8 the fact that such coming to or entry is or will

9 be in violation of law, or

10 ‘‘(ii) brings to or attempts to bring to the

11 United States, in any manner whatsoever, such

12 person at a place other than a designated port

13 of entry or place other than as designated by

14 the Commissioner, regardless of whether such

15 alien has received prior official authorization to

16 come to, enter, or reside in the United States

17 and regardless of any future official action

18 which may be taken with respect to such

19 alien;’’.

20 (b) ENHANCED PENALTY FOR SMUGGLING.—Section

21 274(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8

22 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘shall be

23 fined’’ and all that follows and inserting the following:

24 ‘‘shall—
3

•S 2237 IS

1 ‘‘(i) in the case of a violation of subparagraph

2 (A)(i), be fined in accordance with such title, or im3 prisoned not more than ten years, or both, or

4 ‘‘(ii) in the case of any violation of subpara5 graph (A)(ii), (B), (C), or (D), be fined in accord6 ance with title 18, United States Code, or impris7 oned not more than five years, or both,

8 for each alien in respect to whom such violation occurs.’’.

9 (c) REPEAT OFFENSES.—Section 274(a)(2)(B) of

10 such Act is amended by inserting ‘‘(or, in the case of an

11 offense described in clause (ii), ten years)’’ after ‘‘five

12 years’’.

13 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 this section shall apply to offenses occurring on or after

15 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
No. 10-5978.

#### Bernard DeVeaux, Petitioner v. Dennis Breslin, Superintendent, Arthur Kill Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 985, 131 S. Ct. 421,

178 L. Ed. 2d 329,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8163.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.