alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER97-4345-004 and ER98-2296-000]


Origen Power Corporation, OGE Energy Resources, Inc. and Oklahoma 
Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 15, 1998.
    Origen Power Corporation (Origen) and OGE Energy Resources, Inc. 
(OGE Energy) filed a request for authorization for Origen to engage in 
wholesale sales of electric capacity and energy at market-based rates, 
and for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, Origen 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities 
by Origen. On June 2, 1998, the Commission issued an Order Accepting 
For Filing Proposed Market-Based Rates, Amendment To Market-Based Rate 
Schedule, And Authorizing Power Sales To Affiliate (Order), in the 
above-docketed proceedings.
    The Commission's June 2, 1998 Order granted the request for blanket 
approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in Ordering 
Paragraphs (C), (D), and (F):
    (C) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by Origen should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (D) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (C) above, Origen is hereby authorizied to issue 
securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of Origen, compatible with the 
public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (F) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of Origen's 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities * * * .
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 2, 1998.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16296 Filed 6-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 2-91309, 
33-47832, 33-59562, 333-01871, and 333-01303) and the Registration 
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-76847, 2-81536, 33-26099, 33-30821, 33-48165, 
33-52067, 33-52989, 33-50563, and 33-54099) of Dresser Industries, Inc. of 
our report dated November 27, 1996 appearing on page 29 of the Annual Report 
to Shareowners which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/  Price Waterhouse LLP
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Dallas, Texas
January 27, 1997
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Germany ((Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet))
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Germany ((Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet))
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 20.02  | 9.19   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 09-11278.

#### Basil Hansen, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 951, 131 S. Ct. 172,

178 L. Ed. 2d 249,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7807.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 215.
#### In the Matter of Jimmy A. and Another, Children Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Samuel A., Appellant.

[630 *735NYS2d 578]

—In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (McNulty, J.), entered September 21, 1994, which granted the motion of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for summary judgment and declared the child Jimmy to be an abused child and the child Bryan to be a neglected child, and (2) an order of protection of the same court, entered November 21, 1994, which, *inter alia,*after a hearing, directed the father to "have no contact whatsoever” with the children.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly awarded summary judgment to the Suffolk County Department of Social Services. The father was convicted in County Court of sodomy in the second degree and two counts of sexual abuse in the second degree. The same conduct was alleged in the abuse petition filed in regard to Jimmy. The father’s criminal conviction is conclusive proof as to the finding that Jimmy is an abused child *(see, Matter of Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. [Michael V.] v James M.,*83 NY2d 178; *Matter of Sarah L.,*207 AD2d 1016). The father’s unsubstantiated allegations were insufficient to raise a factual issue *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). Thus, summary judgment was properly granted *(see, Matter of Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. [Michael V.] v James M., supra; S. T. Grand, Inc. v City of New York,*32 NY2d 300, 304). Under the circumstances of this case, the finding that the father sexually abused Jimmy supported a summary determination that Bryan was a neglected child *(see,*Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [i]; *Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Douglas E., III] v Douglas E., Jr.,*191 AD2d 694; *Matter of Rasheda S.,*183 AD2d 770). Rosenblatt, J. P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael A. Brochu,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the date of the financial statements contained therein.

/s/ MICHAEL A. BROCHU
----------------------------------
Michael A. Brochu
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2006

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Loudeye Corp. and will be retained by Loudeye Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-219303-017-CV

IN RE 21ST CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.InN rReE JaAmMeEsS EaArRlL CaArRrRoOlLlL	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL AB:	CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, LIVINGSTON ANDand HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 7, 2005January 21, 2003
# DLA Land and Maritime celebrates National Hispanic Heritage Month

/ Published Nov. 2, 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio,
164 A.3d 411

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MARGARITO MAULEON, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 23, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
No. 10-112.

#### Subbamma V. Vadde, Petitioner v. Bank of America.

562 U.S. 894, 131 S. Ct. 298,

178 L. Ed. 2d 143,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6399,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.

Same case below, 301 Ga. App. 475, 687 S.E.2d 880.
No. 10-5410.

#### Steve Badue, Petitioner v. John McGinness, Sheriff, Sacramento County, California, et al.

562 U.S. 920, 131 S. Ct. 292,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7459.

178 L. Ed. 2d 191,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael C. French, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael C. French
------------------------------

Michael C. French
Chief Executive Officer
November 6, 2002
EXHIBIT 23



        Consent of UHY LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  2-86285)  pertaining to The Eastern Company 1989 Stock Option Plan, the
Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8 No.  333-21349)  pertaining  to The  Eastern
Company 1995 Executive Stock Incentive  Plan, the  Registration  Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-21351)  pertaining to The Eastern Company Directors Fee Program, the
Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8 No.  333-45315)  pertaining  to The  Eastern
Company 1997 Directors Stock Option Plan, and the  Registration  Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-62196)  pertaining  to The Eastern  Company  2000  Executive  Stock
Incentive  Plan  of  our  report  dated  March  9,  2007,  with  respect  to the
consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of The Eastern Company included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 30, 2006.



/s/UHY LLP


Hartford, Connecticut
March 15, 2007



                                      -65-
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Donald Gayhardt, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dollar Financial Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: September 15, 2006       /s/ *Donald Gayhardt*    * *Donald Gayhardt    President  
103
# C_2014015EN.01000502.xml

| 18.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 9 October 2013 — Sofia Zoo v Országos Környezetvédelmi, Természetvédelmi és Vízügyi Főfelügyelőség

(Case C-532/13)

2014/C 15/06

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sofia Zoo

Applicant:

Defendant: Országos Környezetvédelmi, Természetvédelmi és Vízügyi Főfelügyelőség

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Under Article 11(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97, (1) must permits and certificates be deemed void only in respect of the specimens actually affected by a ground for invalidity, or in respect also of the other specimens covered by the permit or certificate? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Under Article 11(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97, (1) must permits and certificates be deemed void only in respect of the specimens actually affected by a ground for invalidity, or in respect also of the other specimens covered by the permit or certificate?

1

| 2. | Does Article 11(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 provide that all the specimens covered by the permits or certificates deemed void in accordance with Article 11(2)(a) must be seized, and may be confiscated, or only those which are actually affected by the ground for invalidity? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does Article 11(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 provide that all the specimens covered by the permits or certificates deemed void in accordance with Article 11(2)(a) must be seized, and may be confiscated, or only those which are actually affected by the ground for invalidity?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (OJ L 61, 3.3.1997, p. 1).

1

---
2017-0823.

#### State v. Carlier.

Clermont App. No. CA2016-11-075. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
# DLA Installation Management Susquehanna team sweeps the Commander’s Cup Series

/ Published Sept. 29, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Susquehanna, Pennsylvania’s 11th Annual Commander's Cup Series concluded September 21st with the challenging Grand Finale 10K all-terrain run. The Commanders Cup Series is an accumulation of nine events over a five-month span.

This year's competition included participation from five teams: Army, Air Force, Marines, DLA Installation Management Susquehanna and DLA Distribution Susquehanna. Competitors participated in a biathlon, a speed golf challenge and an amazing adventure race, just to name a few.

Beyond being a spirited competition, this event significantly fosters esprit de corps and instills a sense of service pride. It underscores the paramount importance of physical fitness activities while enhancing camaraderie and team spirit within our community. 

Please Join us in congratulating this year’s winners:
      - 1st Place Individual - John Tassone representing Team Installation Management with 502 points
      - 2nd Place Individual - Matthew Veley representing Team Installation Management with 270 points
      - 3rd Place Individual - Patrick Sisca representing Team Installation Management with 180 points
      - Overall Commander’s Cup trophy winner - Team Installation Management with a total of 2022 points
Exhibit 31.2I, William W. Phillips, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harrington West FinancialGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 

 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: August 12, 2005     /s/ WILLIAM W. PHILLIPS     William W. Phillips,  President, Chief Operating Officer and  Chief Financial Officer