alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# San Joaquin hosts Expeditionary Academy 

/ Published June 16, 2015
SAN JOAQUIN,  California, 
DLA Distribution Expeditionary team members at DLA Distribution San Joaquin, Calif., hosted a two-day Expeditionary Academy for the Distribution Operations Team San Joaquin Navy Reserve unit June 6 to provide hands-on training in assembling and building a deployable campus. 
The training consisted of assembling the team’s air beam tent, tactical communications trailer, office structure and temporary tents. The final assembly gave the reserve team a first-hand look at what a deployable distribution center would represent in the field. 

According to San Joaquin’s deployable chief, Jason Middleton, the goal of the academy was two-fold. First, enhancing the reserve unit’s skill sets by providing the group with training in the assembly and building the deployable campus which consisted of various materiel handling equipment, tent structures and power equipment. Secondly, with equal importance, the training allowed the expeditionary team to demonstrate their deployable capabilities.

Middleton stressed the importance of training with San Joaquin reserve unit, saying “The key word is cohesion! One of the reserve unit’s roles is to provide contributory support to the expeditionary team. Training events like this facilitate a cohesion and camaraderie between us that, when called upon to work together, compels everyone to quickly join forces to support the warfighter or a humanitarian relief effort.”

He also adds that the Expeditionary Academy was a ‘win-win’ event for the deployable team, the reserve team and DLA as a whole, allowing for the expeditionary team and the reserve team to maintain a high level of interoperability and affording the deployable team the opportunity to assess and perfect its capabilities.
# Army/DLA Service Day focuses on future support

/ Published June 6, 2024
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Army and civilian logistics leaders met to discuss Army transformation and methods for meeting future demands in a contested geopolitical environment May 22 at Defense Logistics Agency Headquarters.

The annual service day is a forum for agency leaders to update Army counterparts on DLA’s support and ongoing efforts around the globe, listen to the Army’s challenges and concerns, and identify areas for collaboration.

“As we think about our ability to deliver in the future, we will continue to examine how we deliver today,” DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Mark Simerly said.

While much of the initial talk shaped the collective understanding of DLA’s combat support role, attendees also participated in open discussions to clearly define the joint logistics enterprise’s primary challenge – contested logistics.

“Change is part of DLA’s DNA. When you consider the contested logistics environment, DLA was born out of change,” Simerly added. 

Attendees explored tough questions to force critical thinking about logistics support at the highest planning and execution levels. Other discussion topics included demand supply forecasting, parts provisioning challenges and data interoperability.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 12, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 12, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0157. GARRETT SMITH et al. v. THE STATE OF GEORGIA EX REL. JOSEPH K. 

MULHOLLAND.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

21CV00484
Aviation, Richmond personnel recognized at annual DLA awards ceremony
 
  By Stephen J. Baker
  Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and DLA Installation Management at Richmond personnel took top honors in several categories during the agency’s 56th Annual Employee Recognition Awards Ceremony, held at its Fort Belvoir-based headquarters Jan. 25. Five personnel, two programs and one team were recognized for excellence by the DLA director, Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic; the vice director, Brad Bunn; and senior enlisted leader, Air Force Command Chief Master Sergeant Alvin R. Dyer. DLA Aviation and DLA Installation Management at Richmond awards included wins in the following categories: **Ten Outstanding Personnel of the Year**Tanner Evans, Customer Support Specialist, DLA Aviation, was lauded for his work as a customer support specialist, particularly his support of more than 700 maintenance demands placed against 500 or more DLA-managed stock numbers.Cmdr. David Odom (USN), DLA Aviation Cherry Point, N.C., was recognized for actions that led to DLA Aviation Cherry Point's exceptional fill rate and material availability levels, which far surpassed the 90 percent monthly goal.**Company Grade Officer of the Year**Cpt. Kwadralyn Townsend redefined the U.S. Air Force career broadening program and worked in various directorates to support DLA missions.**DLA Small Team of the Year**The Bluedog Pin Rivet Ad Hoc deployment team included members from DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City and DLA Distribution who worked alongside Army Material Command and Air Force Material Command to ensure seamless receipt and overnight delivery of prioritized replacement pins to aircraft worldwide.**DLA Lead Police Officer of the Year**Lt. Michael Gallione, DLA Installation Management at Richmond, was recognized as DLA Lead Police Officer of the Year.**DLA Supervisory Police Officer of the Year**Deputy Chief Greg Bock, DLA Installation Management at Richmond, was recognized as DLA Supervisory Police Officer of the Year.**DLA Fire Prevention Program of the Year**DLA Installation Management at Richmond was recognized for having the DLA Fire Prevention Program of the Year. Video of the full award ceremony is available here.
# Ceremony honors patriots and POW/MIAs

/ Published Sept. 15, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Sacrifices for freedom must never be forgotten.  Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna, employees gathered on the fourteenth anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001, in remembrance of those sacrifices, which came as a reminder that freedom is not free.  

They joined to honor the victims and acknowledge first responders at the installation’s Emergency Services facilities, aptly named Building 911.  The event also served as an opportunity to gather in remembrance of the sacrifices made by other American patriots- those killed, missing, or taken prisoner while defending the Nation.

Hosted by DLA Distribution commander Army Brig. Gen. Richard B. Dix, the observance featured a moment of silence at 8:46 a.m. to coincide with the first terrorist attack on the World Trade Center.

Dix asked of those who gathered, “In paying respect to all those who came before us, both civilian and military, take a moment to give thanks to all the warriors who fought in battles, those who have come back and those who have not. All of these individuals have worked so hard to ensure us the freedom we have today.”

Carmen Gordon, the event’s guest speaker, is the Gold Star wife of Army Master Sgt. Gary Gordon.  She spoke in honor of her husband’s memory and to remind others of those who have lost their lives defending freedom.  He was posthumously awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for his service and heroic actions during the 1993 Battle of Mogadishu, Somalia, where he and Randall Shughart were snipers in the Special Forces Operational Detachment Delta.  They sacrificed their own lives to protect four critically wounded downed helicopter crew members. 

She described that painful day in October when she and her young children knew for certain that Master Sgt. Gordon, husband and father, was not coming home again. “Every cool, fall morning I am reminded of that day,” she said. “But I am comforted in knowing that Gary’s selfless actions saved his fellow soldiers.” Her story reminded the audience that not only does a soldier sacrifice, but so too does their family.

Gordon joined installation Police Chief Doug Schraeder and Fire Chief Henry Hoffman in dedicating a wreath in honor of heroes who have perished protecting and serving the country.

The American Legion William H. Nauss Post 143 American Legion Riders performed a Field Cross Ceremony as a memorial for U.S. prisoners of war and those missing in action.  For over two decades, the local Legion has joined with the installation as participants in a POW/MIA remembrance ceremony.  

DLA Installation Support at Susquehanna Security and Emergency Services staff coordinated the observance, with the station that houses emergency response equipment serving as a fitting venue for the gathering.
Phone Log for Atrazine Special Review Docket Page 1 of 1

January 20 , 20 1 1 , 4:10 PM

Melanie Biscoe of EPA/OPP called Dan Campbell of Sy ngenta. During the conversation, Dan Campbell indicated that Syngenta would submit a written request to decommission some Community Water Systems from the Atrazine Moni toring Program at the end of January 2011, along with the Atrazine and Simazine Monitoring Program data submissions required by the Memorandum of Agreement

.

Phone Log prepared by – Melanie Biscoe
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2526

LUTHER C. EDMONDS, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
JOHN E. CLARKSON, individually and in his official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; MARC JACOBSON, individually and inhis official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; JEROME JAMES, individually and in his official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; EVERETTE A. MARTIN, JR., individually and in his official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; JOHN C.MORRISON, JR., individually and in his official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; CHARLES E. POSTON, individually and in his official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; WILLIAM F. RUTHERFORD, individually and in his official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; LYDIA C. TAYLOR, Chief Judge, individually and in herofficial capacity as Chief Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; ALBERT TEICH, individually and in his official capacity as Clerk, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; COMMONWEALTH OFVIRGINIA JUDICIAL INQUIRY AND REVIEW COMMISSION; PAUL F. SHERIDAN, individually and in his official capacity as Chairman, Judicial2 Inquiry and Review Commission; RENO S. HARP, III, individually and in his official capacity as Counsel, Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-97-364-2)
Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luther C. Edmonds, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory E. Lucyk, Edward Meade Macon, Mary Elizabeth Shea, Claude Alexander Allen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Abram William VanderMeer, Jr., CLARK & STANT, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Luther C. Edmonds appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to set aside a prior order imposing sanctions against him. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Edmonds v. Clarkson , No.CA-97-364-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16169]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than July 2, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., Utrecht, 
The Netherlands; to acquire Weiss, Peck & Greer, L.L.C., New York, New 
York, and thereby engage in acting as investment and financial adviser 
to any person, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(6) of Regulation Y; 
conducting agency transactional services for customer investments, 
pursuant to Sec.  225.28 (b)(7) of Regulation Y; acting directly or 
indirectly as general partner of, managing member in or otherwise 
controlling investment funds that invest in up to 5 percent of the 
voting securities and 25 percent of the nonvoting equity of companies; 
See The Dresdner Bank, A.G., 84 Fed. Res. Bull. 361 (1998), 
(``Dresdner/Oeschle''); The Bessemer Group, Incorporated, 82 Fed. Bull. 
569 (1996); and Meridian Bancorp, Inc., 80 Fed. Res. Bull. 736 (1994); 
acting as a commodity pool operator, See Dresdner/Oeschle; providing 
administrative services to mutual funds to the extent set forth in 
Board orders, See Lloyds/IAI Lloyds TSB Group plc, 84 Fed. Res. Bull. 
116 (1998); The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, 82 Fed. 
Res. Bull. 1129 (1996); Bankers Trust New York Corporation, 83 Fed. 
Res. Bull. 780 (1996); and J.P.Morgan, 84 Fed. Res. Bull. 113 (1997).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 12, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-16169 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
2017-0288.

#### State ex rel. Dillard v. Burge.

In Mandamus. On respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 


December 6, 2004


 


David Kenin


16650 Calle Haleigh


Pacific Palisades, CA  90272


 


Re: 2nd
Amendment to Employment Agreement


 


Dear Mr. Kenin:


 


This will confirm our agreement to further amend your employment
agreement with Crown Media United States, LLC, dated December 20, 2001, as
amended October 10, 2003 (the “Agreement”), as follows:


 


1.  The Term of the Agreement and
your employment by Crown Media United States, LLC, as set out in Paragraph 2 of
the Agreement, is extended for an additional three years, through January 2,
2008.


 


2.  Paragraph 3(a) of the
Agreement is amended to provide for payment to you of an annual salary of
$715,000 during the fourth year of the Term (January 3, 2005 through January 2,
2006); $750,000 during the fifth year of the Term (January 3, 2006 through
January 2, 2007); and $790,000 during the sixth year of the Term (January 3,
2007 through January 2, 2008).


 


Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement will remain
in full force and effect.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
  Crown Media United States, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ David Evans

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  David Evans

  
	
   

  	
  President

  



 


Accepted and Agreed to


 


 


	
  /s/ David Kenin

  	
   

  
	
  David Kenin
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfredo Lopez-Suozo, True Name Alfredo Lopez-Suazo, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 865]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ethan Greenberg, J.), rendered August 5, 2014, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick and Moulton, JJ.
# Hamilton assumes command of DLA Troop Support from Shapiro

/ Published July 16, 2015
Philadelphia,
VIII

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2198

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel SERENITY.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 16 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

SERENITY.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 for the vessel SERENITY, United States official number

9 1021393.

Æ
No. 09-10951.

#### Gregory Harris, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 857, 131 S. Ct. 124,

178 L. Ed. 2d 76,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6163,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|West Virginia Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|West Virginia Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2016-1895.

#### State v. Pleatman.

Hamilton App. No. C-160234. Appellant’s motion to consolidate denied.

Fischer and DeWine, JJ., not participating.
#### Harding v. Cutler Group, Inc. 36

04/06/2016

939 MAL (2015)

36

. Justice DONOHUE and Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 485