alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2380

To encourage serious negotiations between the major league baseball players

and the owners of major league baseball in order to prevent a strike

by the players or a lockout by the owners so that the fans will be

able to enjoy the remainder of the baseball season, the playoffs, and

the World Series.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 11, 1994

Mr. METZENBAUM (for himself, Mr. HATCH, and Mr. FEINGOLD) introduced

the following bill; which was read the first time

A BILL

To encourage serious negotiations between the major league

baseball players and the owners of major league baseball

in order to prevent a strike by the players or a lockout

by the owners so that the fans will be able to enjoy

the remainder of the baseball season, the playoffs, and

the World Series.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baseball Fans Protec5 tion Act of 1994’’.
2

•S 2380 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF THE ANTITRUST LAWS TO MAJOR

2 LEAGUE BASEBALL IN EXCEPTIONAL AND EX3 TRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES.

4 The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) is amended

5 by adding at the end the following new section:

6 ‘‘SEC. 27. (a) IN GENERAL.—In the event that a uni7 lateral term or condition is imposed by any party that has

8 been subject to an agreement between the owners of major

9 league baseball and the labor organization representing

10 the players of major league baseball, the antitrust laws

11 shall apply to that term or condition.

12 ‘‘(b) TERMINATION OF EFFECTIVENESS.—Sub13 section (a) shall cease to be effective upon the mutual

14 adoption of an agreement between the owners of major

15 league baseball and the labor organization representing

16 the players of major league baseball to replace the basic

17 agreement between the two parties that expired on Decem18 ber 31, 1993, but subsection (a) shall continue to apply

19 to conduct occurring prior to the adoption of such an

20 agreement.

21 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, ‘term or condi22 tion’ does not include a strike or a lockout.’’.

Æ
#### Com. v. Mason

08/22/2016

325 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 198
#### People v Crespo

1st Dept: 144 AD3d 461 (NY)

granted 3/6/17 (Stein, J.)
No. 10-5089.

#### Mark Vannausdle, Petitioner v. Pierce County Department of Assigned Counsel, et al.

562 U.S. 903, 131 S. Ct. 239,

178 L. Ed. 2d 159,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6257,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2, denied.

Same case below, 149 Wash. App. 1054.
No. 10-6381.

#### Hazel Bonner, Petitioner v. John R. Steele.

562 U.S. 1014, 131 S. Ct. 531,

178 L. Ed. 2d 390,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8644.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Dakota denied.

Same case below, 782 N.W.2d 379.
No. D-2493.

#### In the Matter of Disbarment of David A. Ehrlich.

562 U.S. 958, 131 S. Ct. 500,

178 L. Ed. 2d 318,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7885.

October 12, 2010.

Disbarment entered.

Former order, 561 U.S. 1046, 131 S. Ct. 43, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1133, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5617.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2012-0149

2011-NM-255-AD
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2502

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the

construction of a hydroelectric project in Ohio.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 5 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. GLENN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of a hydroelectric project in Ohio.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission (FERC) project numbered

8 9423, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission may,

9 upon the request of the licensee for such project, in ac10 cordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public in-
2

•S 2502 IS

1 terest requirements of such section and the Commission’s

2 procedures under such section, extend the time period dur3 ing which such licensee is required to commence the con4 struction of such project for not more than 3 consecutive

5 2-year periods.

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect

7 on the date of the expiration of the extension of the period

8 required for the construction of the project described in

9 subsection (a) that was issued before the date of enact10 ment of this section by the Commission under section 13

11 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806).

Æ
#### Noemi Ramos, Appellant, v 2510 Westchester Avenue Associates LLC et al., Respondents.

[65 NYS3d 688]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from an order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered on or about November 1, 2016, and said appeal having been withdrawn before argument by counsel for the respective parties; and upon the stipulation of the parties hereto dated September 13, 2017, it is unanimously ordered that said appeal be and the same is hereby withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid stipulation.

Concur—Tom, J.R, Friedman, Renwick, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
# New video promotes ‘Leap into Summer’ fitness program 

/ Published July 8, 2022
Fort Belvoir, Va, 
As life heads back toward pre-pandemic normalcy, a new video reminds Defense Logistics Agency civilians and military members to bring fitness into their regular routines this summer.

DLA Senior Enlisted Leader Army Command Sgt. Maj. Tomeka O’Neal encourages everyone with access to DLA fitness centers or public gyms to use them as part of the “Leap into Summer!” fitness program. Professionals at DLA and public facilities can help with mobility and movement training, strength conditioning, Pilates, core exercises and more, she says in the video.

“[Our fitness professionals] are always looking to start training classes that would support personal fitness goals, so give them a try during your summer fitness training,” O’Neal says.

The summer fitness program can tie in with the physical fitness tests and requirements for each branch of the military, including the Army Combat Fitness Test 4.0, the new planks addition to the Navy’s Physical Readiness Test, the exercise portions of the Air Force official and mock fitness tests, and the Marines Semper-Fit program and Combat Fitness Test.

A healthy lifestyle and fitness regimen are vital in taking care of oneself, O’Neal says, reminding everyone to stay safe and have fun while working toward summer fitness goals.
SERVED: JULY 22,2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

OCTA VIAN FILOTI 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0613 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013NE700100 has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J .E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Y od 

Chief Administrativ 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

ONE COPY 

Matthew J. Zappala~ Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

New England Region, ANE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

12 New England Executive Park 

Burlington, MA 01821 

TEL: 781-238-7046 

FAX: 781-238-7055 

Octavian Filoti, Respondent 

67 Osprey Drive 

Portsmouth, NH 03 801 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0613 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 19, 2016

p0216

Order 

Clerk

February 19, 2016

152905

In re STURGIS, Minors. SC: 152905

COA: 324127

Wayne CC Family Division:

13-514853-NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 3, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C-130 parts delivered on time, every time by DLA Distribution Warner Robins

/ Published April 25, 2016
WARNER ROBINS, Georgia, 
More than half the work completed at DLA Distribution Warner Robins, Ga., is in support of the Warner Robins Air Logistics Center. The organization's inventory includes parts and equipment for F-15, C-130, C-5 and C-17 aircraft, target acquisition systems, and most airborne electronic warfare systems. 

Kent Wheeler, director, DLA Distribution Warner Robins, Ga., was approached last fall by Air Force Col. Rod Bloker, DLA Aviation Warner Robins commander, regarding a delay in flight testing for C-130 planes awaiting parts. The C-130 is a key aircraft for the U.S. Air Force, primarily performing the tactical portion of the airlift mission. Since it can take off from rough, dirt strips it is the prime transport for airdropping troops and equipment into hostile areas.  

In an effort to assist co-located DLA Aviation with the C-130 parts delivery dilemma, Wheeler assigned an Emergency Supply Operations Center, or ESOC, team at DLA Distribution Warner Robins to fine-tune the parts delivery process and ensure timely delivery. The ESOC team jumped into action, using a 24/7 systems analysis to create a report listing any emergency requisitions for the C-130 test area. During the last three weeks of September 2015, the ESOC team received requisition reports via email. The C-130 parts were then picked and delivered within one hour after the request was dropped into the Distribution Standard System, DLA Distribution’s electronic warehousing system.

In addition to the reports, U.S. Air Force and DLA Aviation customer supply representatives notified DLA Distribution customer service via email before 8 a.m. on any day they had a part scheduled for delivery from off base. The tracking numbers for the shipments were then loaded into the scan guns at Distribution’s receiving dock. The scan guns were set to beep several times to indicate the tracking numbers were scanned, and the parts were then expedited in receiving with an emergency ticket to allow the ESOC team to deliver the parts immediately to DLA Aviation. In addition to the emergency ticket, the parts were labeled with a “red hot” sticker to make them stand out. 

Finally, at 3:00 p.m. every day, DLA Distribution communicated with the C-130 Forward Logistics Specialists to make sure they had everything they needed for the day.

According to Wheeler, “Demonstrating one of DLA Distribution’s core capabilities- materiel movement tracking and expediting- DLA Distribution Warner Robins has put a system in place for ensuring a quick turn-time for C-130 repair parts. The ESOC team has set a standard. A system is now in place for any future emergency delivery situations.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                               232,400
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      1,152,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                          913,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   2,715,100
<PP&E>                                             2,836,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                     1,574,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     5,395,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2,107,400
<BONDS>                                              756,300
<COMMON>                                              46,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                         1,536,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       5,395,800
<SALES>                                            6,533,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   6,561,500
<CGS>                                              5,088,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      6,076,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    60,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      426,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                         145,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  257,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         257,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           1.44
        



</TABLE>
# DLA Energy adds new customers to Direct Supply Natural Gas Program

/ Published Oct. 1, 2015
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, Installation Energy
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer  Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)  of the Exchange Act

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|By: |  | /s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Financial Officer
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  | Date: May 16, 2005                                               

---



QuickLinks
#### O'Brien v. Dela Pena

11/02/2015

200 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 118 A.3d 445
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16339]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

NAME OF AGENCY: Postal Rate Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:30 a.m., July 23, 1998.

PLACE: Commission Conference Room, 1333 H Street, NW, Suite 300, 
Washington, DC 20268-0001.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: To discuss and vote on the Postal Rate 
Commission Budget for FY 1999 and election of a Vice Chairman.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Margaret P. Crenshaw, Secretary, 
Postal Rate Commission, Suite 300, 1333 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 
20268-0001, (202) 789-6820.

    Dated: June 16, 1998.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16339 Filed 6-16-98; 11:46 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
No. 10-5777.

#### Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr., Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 967, 131 S. Ct. 467,

178 L. Ed. 2d 297,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7934.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130980 & (17) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130980 

 COA: 264739 

Kalkaska CC: 94-001397-FH 

FRANK MICHAEL FLANDERS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed 

to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion 

to remand is DENIED. 

s1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3531-3532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

43 CFR Part 2360

RIN 1004-AC79
[WO-130-1820-00 24 1A]


National Petroleum Reserve, Alaska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is withdrawing a rule that 
proposed removing sections of 43 CFR part 2360. The proposal was 
published in the Federal Register on October 23, 1996, and would have 
removed all of part 2360 except for provisions dealing with use 
authorizations. BLM had proposed to remove the regulations because we 
thought they were repetitive of statutory language or obsolete.


[[Page 3532]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Bruno, Regulatory Affairs Group 
(WO-630), Bureau of Land Management, Mail Stop 401LS, 1849 ``C'' 
Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20240; telephone (202) 452-0352 
(Commercial or FTS).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BLM published the proposed rule on October 
23, 1996, at 61 FR 54977-54978. The comment period closed on November 
22, 1996, and we received only one public comment letter. Because of 
the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska Environmental Impact Statement 
planning project that is currently underway, BLM decided to withdraw 
the proposed rule, and will take no further action on the proposal.

    Dated: January 15, 1998.
Sylvia V. Baca,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management
[FR Doc. 98-1597 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael E. Kalogris, Chief Executive Officer of SunCom Wireless, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SunCom Wireless, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted in accordance with Section III E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293] for the registrant and have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [omitted in accordance with Section III.E. of SEC Release No. 34-47986 and SEC Release No. 34-51293]; 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 13, 2007
#### Bonnie Buchwald, Appellant, v Silverman Shin & Byrne PLLC et al., Respondents.

[50 NYS3d 272]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered or about July 11, 2016, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Viewing the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff, no triable issues of fact exist as to whether defendant discriminated against plaintiff based on a perceived disability. Defendant’s alleged conduct consists of “petty slights or trivial inconveniences” that do not suffice to support a hostile work environment claim under the New York City Human Rights Law *(see Williams v New York City Hous. Auth.,*61 AD3d 62, 79-80 [1st Dept 2009]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.
2017-0422.

#### State v. Daniels.

Hamilton App. No. C-160203, 2017-Ohio-548.

Fischer, J., not participating.