alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
REGISTRANT'S  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS,  DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      122
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                               553
<ALLOWANCES>                                  4
<INVENTORY>                                 507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1259
<PP&E>                                     20763
<DEPRECIATION>                              5333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             19949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2022
<BONDS>                                     1000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                     222
<OTHER-SE>                                 11487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               19949
<SALES>                                     4686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            4893
<CGS>                                       5077
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               8967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5440)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5440)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5440)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.27)
        


</TABLE>
Fire warden training prepares and empowers DLA employees on DSCR
 
  By Natalie Skelton, DLA Aviation Public Affairs
  Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Richmond and Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia tenant employees recently completed semi-annual training preparing them to serve as fire wardens around DSCR. Classes were held virtually and in-person in the Frank B. Lotts Center Mar. 21, 22, and 23. "They are our eyes and ears between facility inspections," said William Hock, assistant chief of Training and Fire Prevention for DLA Installation Management Richmond’s Fire and Emergency Services. Hock said his office counts on fire wardens for fire extinguisher inspections and routine facility inspections around DSCR, as well as accountability during fire alarm inspections. Annual training focuses on workplace safety and fire hazards for fire wardens, who are appointed for a minimum of one year. Fire wardens are also responsible for ensuring emergency procedure information is disseminated within their work areas, briefing new employees on emergency evacuation procedures and routes,  ensuring their building or area of responsibility has an emergency evacuation diagram that includes evacuation and accountability procedures during emergencies. The next training opportunity will be held in October.
No. 09-10877.

#### Jose Luis Ortiz, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 854, 131 S. Ct. 116,

178 L. Ed. 2d 71,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6271.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
                  ---------------------------------------------

     Assignment dated June 30, 2004 between Duane Bennett ("Assignor") and Axiom
III,  Inc.,  a  Nevada  Corporation  ("Assignee").

     WHEREAS,  Assignor  is  a  party to that certain agreement dated August 27,
2003, captioned "Lessard Property Management Services, Inc. Residential Property
Management  Agreement,"  a  copy  of  which  is  attached  hereto  as Exhibit A;

     WHEREAS,  Assignor  has  reorganized the ownership of one of the properties
under  management  by  Lessard Property Management Services, Inc. ("Lessard") so
that  such  property  is  now owned by Assignee, and now desires to transfer the
rights  and obligations under Lessard's agreement (Exhibit A) to the Assignee as
well;  and

     WHEREAS,  Assignee  would  like to receive an assignment of both the rights
and  obligations  of  Lessard's  Agreement  (Exhibit  A);

     NOW  THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements set
forth  herein,  and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which  both  parties  hereby  acknowledge,  the  parties  agree  as  follows:

     1.     Assignor  hereby  assigns its rights and obligations under Lessard's
Agreement  (as  set  forth  in  Exhibit  A) to the following limited extent: the
assignment  of  rights  and  obligations shall apply only to the apartment house
located  at  80  Cochran Street, Chicopee, Massachusetts.  Assignor shall retain
all  other  rights  and obligations not specifically pertaining to the apartment
house  at  80  Cochran  Street.

     2.     Assignee  hereby  agrees to receive and honor the foregoing assigned
rights  and  obligations.

     3.     Said  assignment  is  expressly  conditioned  on  Lessard's  written
approval  and  consent  of  same.

     4.     Once  Lessard  approves  and  consents  to this assignment, Assignor
shall  be  released  from  and  held  harmless from all liability or obligations
assigned  by this Assignment, and shall have no further legal responsibility for
them.  Likewise,  upon  Lessard's  approval  and  consent, Assignor releases and
holds  harmless  Assignee  and  Lessard  from  all  liability  or obligations to
Assignee,  and  waives  all further claims arising from or related to the rights
assigned  herein.

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  parties  have  signed  this  agreement  below.

AXIOM  III,  INC.  (Assignee)            Assignor

_______________________________          __________________________________
By:  Duane  Bennett,  President          Duane  Bennett,  in his individual
                                         capacity


     On behalf of Lessard Property Management Services, Inc., I am authorized to
approve  and consent to the foregoing assignment, effective as of the date first
appearing  above.

LESSARD  PROPERTY  MANAGEMENT  SERVICES,  INC.

__________________________________
By:  Paul  D.  Lessard,  President
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 208-209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: National Security Education 
Program (NSEP Grants to Institutions of Higher Education); DD Forms 
2729 and 2730; OMB Number 0704-0366.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Number of Respondents: 185.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Response: 185.

[[Page 209]]

    Average Burden Per Response: 8.75 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,619.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection is necessary to obtain 
and record the qualification and budget information of universities 
submitting proposal for National Security Education Program funding. 
Respondents are representatives of U.S. colleges and universities who 
choose to submit a proposal in competition for a National Security 
Education Program (NSEP) Institutional Grant. The NSEP was established 
by the National Security Education Act of 1991. DD Form 2729, 
``National Security Education Program Proposal Budget Estimate 
Worksheet,'' is a single-page document in which the applicant indicates 
the cost associated with the proposal by four major categories. Without 
this form there would be no precise, standard manner for applicant to 
portray their budget requests. Further, there would be no consistent 
measure by which the merit-review panelists could judge these 
proposals. DD Form 2730, ``National Security Education Program Proposal 
Cover Sheet,'' is a concise vehicle for transmitting proposals. This 
form eliminates the need for lengthy, nonstandard letters of 
transmittal.
    Affected Public: Business or Other For-Profit.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: December 24, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-16 Filed 1-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
No. 10-107.

#### Patrizia Riccardi, Petitioner v. Robert Kessler.

562 U.S. 894, 131 S. Ct. 298,

178 L. Ed. 2d 143,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6458.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 350.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-373-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

January 16, 1998.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on January 21, 1998, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., for the purpose of exploring the possible settlement 
of the above-referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, contact Edith A. Gilmore at (202) 208-
2158 or Sandra J. Delude at (202) 208-0583.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1594 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.2RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002I, Russell Van Zandt certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Veridien Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth physical quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 3, 2005
#### The League of Arab States, Respondent, v 4 Third Avenue Leasehold, LLC, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 604]

*319Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered February 10, 2003, which, upon the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, inter alia, declared that plaintiff tenant is not responsible for certain security costs incurred by defendant landlord, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant implemented additional security measures at its building after plaintiff, an organization of Arab states with permanent observer status to the United Nations, received bomb and death threats shortly after September 11, 2001. Defendant now seeks to recover these additional security costs from plaintiff on the ground that plaintiffs tenancy in its building created a safety risk and was thus a nuisance. The IAS court correctly rejected this claim on the ground that defendant fails to point to any conduct on plaintiffs part constituting the “legal cause” of the threats other than its lawful possession of the leased premises (quoting *Copart Indus. v Consolidated Edison Co.,*41 NY2d 564, 569 [1977]). Rather, the risk to other tenants from the threats to blow up defendant’s building, i.e., the invasion of their interest in the use and enjoyment of their leaseholds *(see id.),*was caused by third parties not under plaintiffs control *(compare Frank v Park Summit Realty Corp.,*175 AD2d 33 [1991], *mod on other grounds*79 NY2d 789 [1991]). Plaintiff had no obligation to accept defendant’s offer of alternate space *(cf. Nap Snacks Corp. v Greene,*122 AD2d 28 [1986]), or to provide its own security, or to contact the United States Department of State for assistance. As landlord, defendant had the duty in the first instance to provide security *(see Burgos v Aqueduct Realty Corp.,*92 NY2d 544, 548 [1998]). While a landlord and tenant can agree that the tenant will assume the landlord’s duties *(see e.g. Morel v City of New York,*192 AD2d 428 [1993]), nothing in the detailed, lengthy lease, which provides for “additional rent” in many other circumstances and contains an integration clause, indicates that plaintiff agreed to be responsible for security costs. We have considered and rejected defendant’s other arguments. Concur— Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ. [See 194 Misc 2d 51.]
No. 10-5504.

#### Demetrius Marquise Adams, Petitioner v. Thomas L. Simpson, Warden.

562 U.S. 925, 131 S. Ct. 310,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7448.

178 L. Ed. 2d 202,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California successfully ships F-35 parts to Denmark

/ Published Oct. 26, 2022
TRACY, Calif., 
The Defense Logistics Agency Distribution San Joaquin, California, successfully sent a test shipment of F-35 parts to Denmark as agreed upon between the U.S. and Danish government.

In 2019, the F-35 Lightning II Joint Program Office designated DLA and U.S. Transportation Command as the F-35 product support provider for North American warehousing and global transportation.

​This change was brought on to optimize F-35 program sustainment costs while demonstrating DLA Distribution’s capabilities for storing and distributing Defense Department weapon systems.

Since shipping F-35 related material to non-DoD affiliated entities has increased for DLA and U.S. TRANSCOM, DDJC along with direction from the F-35 Lightning II JPO, is working to optimize this process.

“Now that we are close to finishing phase two, we started to test our F-35 distribution capabilities to our partners,” said Natalie Lee Haynes, the DDJC facilities manager for the F-35 division. “Our objective with this test shipment to Denmark was to validate end to end processes that come along with delivering hazardous materials overseas.”

The overall intent of the pilot shipment to Denmark was to test DLA Distribution’s processes and capabilities regarding distributing F-35 Material to support mission partners across the globe.

“The whole idea of this test shipment to Denmark was to utilize the U.S. TRANSCOM carriers and test shipping processes with an F35 partner nation. We were able to test the systems, mobility, shipment, and communications to ensure that the supply chain could provide all stakeholders with pertinent data,” Haynes said.

This was the first test that allowed DLA Distribution, U.S. TRANSCOM and the JPO to see some of the challenges associated with distributing materials to partner nations.

“In the past, we have only distributed materials to DoD entities. Now that we are working with partner nations, there is a whole new process due to international export protocols and various regulations that we never had to handle in the past,” Haynes said. “With our shipment to Denmark, we were able to get a better understanding of the special requirements associated with distributing these materials.”

Once DDJC solidifies the process of shipping materials to partner nations, DLA will be able to automate its infrastructure and increase the speed partners get their materials.

DDJC receives, stores and ships materiel in support of warfighters around the clock, around the world.
2017-0655.

#### Great Lakes Bar Control, Inc. v. Testa.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2016-34.
# DLA Distribution commander delivers women's equality day message

/ Published Aug. 25, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
We join the Nation in celebrating Women’s Equality Day, which honors the signing of the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution. This amendment marked a significant milestone in our Nation’s history by granting women the fundamental right to vote.

In 1972, President Richard Nixon designated August 26th as “Women’s Rights Day,” acknowledging the persistent efforts and advocacy of the women’s suffrage movement over many years. This day serves as an ongoing occasion to commemorate the accomplishments of women and to persist in the pursuit of gender equality.

In celebration of Women’s Equality Day, I encourage each and every one of you to reflect on the principles of freedom, equality, and respect that our great Nation stands for. This is a time to recognize the immense contributions of women throughout history, and to educate ourselves about the struggles they have faced and the victories they have achieved in their fight for equality. To deepen your understanding of the significance of this day, please take a moment to read the attached newsletter, created by DLA Distribution EEO.

As one team, we need to reaffirm our commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. I would like to express my gratitude to each of you for your dedication, hard work, and unwavering commitment to our mission. Together, let us celebrate the commitment to equality and continue striving for a future where equality prevails. By honoring Women’s Equality Day, we not only acknowledge our Nation's history but also renew our commitment to achieving equality, and empowerment for all women.

Mr. Knight and I would like to thank each and every one of you for your continued support to our Warfighters.
No. 09-11302.

#### Juan E. Castro, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 873, 131 S. Ct. 175,

178 L. Ed. 2d 105,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6625.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 750.
Exhibit 32.2



MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



The undersigned, Susan E. Knight, the Chief Financial Officer of MTS Systems Corporation (the Company), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report).



The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: May 8, 2007



/s/ SUSAN E. KNIGHTSusan E. KnightVice President and Chief Financial Officer


---
No. 09-1541.

#### Vietnam Veterans of America, et al., Petitioners v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

562 U.S. 839, 131 S. Ct. 195,

178 L. Ed. 2d 44,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5994.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Same case below, 389 U.S. App. D.C. 392, 599 F.3d 654.