alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Frankie S., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Katiria Y., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[65 NYS3d 195]

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Sarah R Cooper, J.), entered on or about October 13, 2016, which denied respondent mother’s motion to modify the order of disposition entered on or about July 30, 2015, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Modification of the dispositional order and vacatur of the neglect finding is not authorized under Family Court Act § 1051 (c), since that statute only permits dismissal at the fact-finding stage *(see Matter of Leenasia C. [Lamarriea C.],*154 AD3d 1, 8 [1st Dept 2017]). Nor are modification and vacatur warranted under Family Court Act § 1061, as the mother failed to demonstrate good cause that the relief sought promoted the best interests of the child *(see id.*at 9). Notably, the mother neither sought a hearing at which she might testify, nor submitted an affidavit in support of her motion. She had a significant child protective history, including two neglect proceedings involving the child. The first proceeding, which alleged medical and educational neglect of the child, ended with an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal. After the mother completed the mandated services, a second proceeding was commenced against her with the some of the same allegations, and including an additional claim of excessive corporal punishment of an older child in the home, resulting in the neglect finding. The mother’s offenses were serious because she failed to address the child’s special needs on a consistent basis.

Moreover, the record does not reflect evidence of remorse, *560acknowledgment by the mother of her parental deficiencies in the past, or amenability to correction. As the court noted, it is not unreasonable to believe that its aid would be required in the future, given the mother’s difficulties in the past coping with her children’s needs and the absence of any sworn statement by her addressing the court’s reasonable concerns.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32653-32654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15818]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER98-2568-000, ER98-2569-000, and ER98-2584-000, (not 
consolidated)]

WKE Station Two, Inc. et al; Western Kentucky Energy Corp., and 
LG&E Energy Marketing Inc. Notice of Filing

June 9, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 9, 1998, Petitioners WKE Station Two, Inc. 
(Station Two Subsidiary), Western Kentucky Energy Corp. (WKEC) and LG&E 
Energy Marketing Inc. (LEM) tendered for filing information which 
amends in part certain rate schedules and service agreements previously 
submitted for approval in each of the above-referenced dockets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance 
with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before June 19, 1998. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be

[[Page 32654]]

taken, but will not serve to make Protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15818 Filed 6-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan    | Feb    | Mar    | Apr    | May    | Jun    | Jul    | Aug    | Sep    | Oct    | Nov    | Dec   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2022                                                                                                                              |        |        | 18,193 | 17,738 | 25,223 | 32,118 | 33,140 | 33,770 | 38,474 | 45,308 | 36,129 | 37,750
|2023                                                                                                                              | 42,761 | 44,969 | 38,135 | 39,668 | 41,844 | 29,856 | 38,728 | 35,660 | 38,997 | 47,860 | 46,509 | 45,150
|2024                                                                                                                              | 48,208 | 44,349 | 47,063 | 38,095 | 44,911 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
january 23,2012
Office ofAviation Analysis .· ..**~'** U.S. Department ofTransportation Attention: Kevin Adams RE: Essential Air Service- Karluk. Alaska Andrew Airways is placing this bid for the Essential Air Service contract, for the Village of Karluk, Alaska on Kodiak Island. Under this contract we will operate scheduled service to Karluk from Kodiak State Airport (ADQ) on a non-flag stop basis 3 times perweek. This service is bid utilizing a Piper PA-32 Saratoga, having 6 seats available on each flight. Flights thatrequire greater capacity will be moved to a De Havilland DHC-2 Beaver at no additional cost to the DOT. Andrew Airways is an established charteroperator on Kodiak Island. We operate 5 aircraft year round. This allows flexibility to ensure thatthe Village ofKarluk will always receive excellent and timely service. Safety and Customer Service are ourpriorities. In the event ofweather delays, alternate aircraft orextra flights will be provided to ensure thatwe meetthe transportation needs ofthe public. Our safety record is unsurpassed on the island, and we believe that our service to Karluk will enhance quality oflife and tourism to the community. Our staffis professional and courteous, always going above and beyond to help all ofour clients with their needs before, during and after their flights. We have van service that will assist the traveler getting from our bases at the airport and Trident Basin, to their destinations in the town ofKodiak We will also pick up traveler before their flight and getthem to the airport for theirflight ifrequested. AndrewAirways is a Drug Free company, with all employees enrolled in a comprehensive drug screening program. We are also an equal opportunity employer. Our pilots are all experienced having at least more than 2500 hours total flight time, with 500 hours flying in Alaska. The pilots have all been flying in the demanding Kodiak area for years, and are very professional in all aspects ofthejob.Andrew Airways, Inc. Page 2 of2 January 23, 2012 Pleasefind the following bidproposal for the EssentialAir bid- Karluk, Alaska: 

### .--- .

TOTAL BLOCK HOURS 280**·-·~·-·** Piper Saratoga

- 6 Passenger Seats AircraftType Subject to 1000#Total Weight Caeacity**~~ '~**  Passenger $ 93,744



## --

Freight I $ 26,656 ' Mail $0

·-- Total Revenue $120,400

# ~Pilot --- $ 27,210

.. Fuel $ 26,252 f-9il $ 420

--

Maintenance $ 30,030 I Lease $ 22,400**---~----**

---1

tJnsurance**---~-** $ 7,428

-·- Total Directs $113,740**·-~** Ground Crew $ 25,056

.. Accounting $ 12,528

-

- Total In directs $ -37,584 OperatingExpense $ 151,324



## - 5% Margin $ 7,556

Total Cost $158,892 ANNUAL COMPENSATION $ 3H,-i9l Attached please find our Business License, Certificate ofInsurance and additional documents to substantiate fitness. Please feel free to contact us for additional information ordocumentation. Thankyou in advance for the opportunityto submit this proposal. Sincerely,

## ~< /l 

# L

.**~-l....** / [1--.../ \._./' Dean Andrew Owner
S. 2395

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To designate the United States Courthouse in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Theodore

Levin Courthouse’’, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. THEODORE LEVIN FEDERAL BUILDING AND COURTHOUSE.

(a) REDESIGNATION.—The courthouse facility located at 231

West Lafayette, in Detroit, Michigan, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Courthouse’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the courthouse facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to

be a reference to the ‘‘Theodore Levin Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,Robert L. Demorest, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of MOCON, Inc.;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 14, 2006

 
| /s/ Robert L. Demorest                 |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Robert L.  Demorest                    |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer and President |   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |   |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Craig J. Cerny, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harrington West FinancialGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 

 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.Date: August 12, 2005     /s/ Craig J. Cerny     Craig J. Cerny, Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00534-CV

Michael Gary Erickson, II, Appellant

v.

Ron Wood, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. 275509,

HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Michael Gary Erickson no longer wishes to pursue his appeal and has filed

a motion to dismiss. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B.A. Smith and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: October 5, 2006
No. 10-6026.

#### Robert Anthony Escareno, Petitioner v. Mike Evans, Warden.

562 U.S. 970, 131 S. Ct. 478,

178 L. Ed. 2d 302,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8035.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# COREX 22 kicks-off with training in Battle Creek, Michigan

/ Published July 18, 2022
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Members of the Defense Logistics Agency kicked-off the annual Contingency Operations Readiness Exercise at the Battle Creek Air National Guard Base and Fort Custer.

“This is the biggest DLA expeditionary exercise in the history of DLA,” said DLA Disposition Services Director Mike Cannon as he further discussed the level of collaboration across the agency.

The two-week exercise will test the skills and training of each participant including property accounting, cutting and shredding as well as site construction and tear down, marking the final expeditionary training element for those taking part in COREX 22.

“This is the culmination of all the training that we provide here at the expeditionary site,” said Brian Davidson, DLA Disposition Services instructor and property disposal specialist. “The students are going to come in and practice all of the things that they have learned throughout all the different courses that they have taken here.”

This exercise ensures that each person is equipped to successfully operate in any DLA serviced location. Each team member plays a role in the process from the set-up, operations and tear-down of a disposal site.

“This is going to prepare them and validate their skills, so they are able to deploy and operate in any type of environment around the world,” said Davidson.

Different than in years past, COREX 22 is about more than just Disposition Services personnel working alone. The exercise this year features a level of unprecedented collaboration between major subordinate commands.

“The biggest difference is the interactions amongst the DLA MSCs [major subordinate commands],” said Jeff Nofzinger, a readiness officer and exercise planner.

COREX 22 began with preparation and meetings before arriving in Battle Creek, Michigan. Over the weekend, participants arrived and completed a training session before moving into more advanced expeditionary tasks. Due to safety being a high priority within Disposition Services, the exercise confirms each participant can perform the necessary tasks adequately and safely.

“Some of our sites don’t have particular equipment that we’re trained on,” said Robert Small, an equipment specialist based out of Susquehanna, Pennsylvania. “So, it’s kind of a refresher that makes sure we still have the skills we need to operate the equipment.”

Through this exercise, DLA personnel will receive new challenges and but also gain valuable experiences. Over the next two weeks safety will be at the forefront but leaders are also looking for each participant to gain something positive from their time at COREX.

“I hope everyone stays safe and has some fun, but also finds some skills that they can put to use in the field if they ever do deploy,” Davidson said.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2154 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2154

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to repeal the requirement that 
    amounts paid to a member of the Armed Forces under the Special 
Separation Benefits program of the Department of Defense, or under the 
 Voluntary Separation Incentive program of that Department, be offset 
  from amounts subsequently paid to that member by the Department of 
              Veterans Affairs as disability compensation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

 Mr. Jeffords introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to repeal the requirement that 
    amounts paid to a member of the Armed Forces under the Special 
Separation Benefits program of the Department of Defense, or under the 
 Voluntary Separation Incentive program of that Department, be offset 
  from amounts subsequently paid to that member by the Department of 
              Veterans Affairs as disability compensation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR CONCURRENT RECEIPT OF SPECIAL SEPARATION 
              BENEFIT OR VOLUNTARY SEPARATION INCENTIVE AND DISABILITY 
              COMPENSATION.

    (a) Special Separation Benefit.--Section 1174a(g) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended by striking out ``subsection (e)(2)(A)'' 
and inserting in lieu thereof ``subsections (e)(2)(A) and (h)(2)''.
    (b) Voluntary Separation Incentive.--Section 1175(e) of such title 
is amended by striking out paragraph (4).
    (c) Effective Dates.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and 
(b) shall take effect as of December 5, 1991.

                                      <all>
```
No. 10-5915.

#### In re Jack Lucious, Jr., Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 359,

178 L. Ed. 2d 257,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7694,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00185

- CV

Thomas W. Harrison

v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Successor by Merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A.

On Appeal from the 58th District Court of Jefferson County , Texas

Trial Cause No. A

- 183,004

JUDGMENT
THE THI RTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
March 26 , 2015