alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(a)

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of ALLTEL Corporation(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott T.Ford, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

          (1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Scott T. Ford

Scott T. FordChief Executive Officer and PresidentNovember 13, 2002
No. 10-5921.

#### Luis Enrique Calderon-Quinonez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 941, 131 S. Ct. 359,

178 L. Ed. 2d 232,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7160.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 540.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LIFECORE
BIOMEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,092,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,953,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,955,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   346,000
<INVENTORY>                                 15,693,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,075,000
<PP&E>                                      39,840,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,948,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,948,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,991,000
<BONDS>                                      6,658,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       123,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,176,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,948,000
<SALES>                                     25,570,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,570,000
<CGS>                                       10,941,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,115,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             122,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                233,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            233,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   233,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
No. 10-6154.

#### Kweku Hanson, Petitioner v. Connecticut.

562 U.S. 986, 131 S. Ct. 425,

178 L. Ed. 2d 331,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8130.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut denied.

Same case below, 117 Conn. App. 436, 979 A.2d 576.
No. 10-6290.

#### Troy Keith Lockett, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 973, 131 S. Ct. 489,

178 L. Ed. 2d 310,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7907.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 435 Fed. Appx. 315.
# Aviation hosts first in-person new director ‘Round Robin’ in five years

/ Published Feb. 3, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation hosted a three-day ‘Round Robin’ Jan 24-26, to familiarize new directors across Aviation and its 18 locations, on the different elements of the organization.

The event took place in Conference Room 108 of the DLA Aviation Operation Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. 

“These events are important because the main thing is the relationships,” said DLA Aviation commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler. “Building that personal relationship with our Commanders, OICs, and Directors from the ISA’s, as well as here in Richmond helps us [DLA Aviation] get after warfighter readiness and align with the goals of the services.” 

The ‘Round Robin’ was initially designed for Aviation’s ISA directors only but has since expanded to now include directors and division chiefs from across the organization.

The first one took place back in 2018, but due to social distancing polices and travel restrictions put in place by DLA headquarters due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the next event was held virtually in 2022. 

“It’s good to be back in-person,” said Air Force Col. Daniel Willison, director of the DLA Aviation Customer Operations Directorate. “Last year this event was held virtually because of the pandemic, and it just wasn’t the same.”

In addition to the roundtable discussions, attendees took part in one-on-one engagements led by those within leadership roles throughout DLA Aviation. They also virtually attended the agency’s performance review hosted by Navy Rear Adm. Joseph “Doug” Noble Jr., director, DLA Logistics Operations/Commander, Joint Regional Combat Support

“Meetings like this are very important because it’s a great opportunity to network and meet the other directors face-to-face,” Willison said. “It’s just good to be able to talk with one another and see what other people’s hot rocks are and how we can all come together to provide support to the ISA’s.”

Tyler said while the ‘Round Robin’ is designed for the individual currently seated in a particular leadership position, this event can help shape the position for the next person. This is an opportunity for the current directors to tell senior leadership what works and what doesn’t.
No. 10-5027.

#### Mauricio Leon, Petitioner v. Michael McCall, Warden.

562 U.S. 899, 131 S. Ct. 230,

178 L. Ed. 2d 153,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6631.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 361 Fed. Appx. 509.
#### Louis Dossous, Appellant, v Corporate Owners Bayridge Nissan, Inc., Respondent.

[63 NYS3d 109]

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rungs County (Velasquez, J.), dated May 5, 2015, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and, in effect, granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment on its counterclaim to recover charges due.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff left his vehicle with the defendant, a car dealer and service shop, after signing a work order. Later that day, the plaintiff refused to pay a charge for diagnostic testing and the defendant refused to release the vehicle to him. The plaintiff’s vehicle remained at the defendant’s premises for multiple months.

The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant to recover damages for breach of contract. The defendant counterclaimed to recover charges due for diagnostic and storage fees. The defendant moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and on its counterclaim. The Supreme Court, inter alia, granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and, in effect, granted that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment on its counterclaim. The plaintiff appeals.

*612The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]), and the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).

Further, the Supreme Court properly, in effect, granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment on its counterclaim. The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on its counterclaim *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d at 324) by submitting, inter alia, the work order that the plaintiff signed, by which he agreed to be responsible for diagnostic and storage fees incurred. The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d at 562).

Leventhal, J.P., Austin, Cohen and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
#### Thomas C. Golombek, Respondent, v John A. Monahan, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[768 NYS2d 876]

Appeal from that part of an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Marshall, J), entered November 19, 2002, that granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment against defendant John A. Monahan on the issue of liability.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby *1405is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy,*140 AD2d 988 [1988]; *Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts,*63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; *see also*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
#### East Ramapo Central School District, Respondent, v New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 420]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Stephen A. Bucaria, J.), entered October 22, 2013.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

*682The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal and cross appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the companion appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; *East Ramapo Cent. Sch. Dist. v New York Schs. Ins. Reciprocal,*150 AD3d 683 [2d Dept 2017] [decided herewith]).

Leventhal, J.P., Maltese, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
# Land and Maritime commander conducts final town hall; announces retirement 

/ Published March 29, 2016
COLUMBUS, Ohio, In a March 23 town hall event reaffirming DLA Land and Maritime’s commitment to its people and culture, the top ranking service member at the installation announced his upcoming retirement.DLA Land and Maritime commander, Navy Rear Adm. John King told the crowded auditorium in Building 20 on Defense Supply Center Columbus that his military career would soon end after more than 30 years of service. “I’ve had an absolutely fantastic time being the commander of DLA Land and Maritime. I’ve loved every day of it,” King said. “I’m still struck by the quality of individuals who work in Columbus and at our detachments and in the shipyards.“I’ve been amazed at how well we continue to get better and better and how much our associates care about the men and women in uniform.”King’s heartfelt remarks followed an award ceremony recognizing outstanding associates for their work during the previous quarter and a presentation emphasizing the significance of culture at DLA. The town hall theme focused on the evolution of the culture environment at Land and Maritime from the past to the present, and how it will continue to play a vital role into the future. One of the cultural principles discussed was the value of resiliency in an organization. King pointed out the agency’s track record of taking care of its associates. This includes identifying issues that may impact the workforce and developing plans to mitigate those obstacles.“When you work shoulder-to-shoulder with somebody, take the time to make sure that they’re doing okay.” King said. “Everybody faces tough issues in their lives, and you never really know what the person next to you is going through. Good friends look each other in the eye and they make sure they tell one another where they can get help or get support.”King also spoke to the importance of constantly seeking to grow and improve as an organization through listening to the voices of its members. Part of this initiative includes the 2016 DLA Culture Survey which will offer a comprehensive assessment of the agency’s culture climate.“There is room for us to accomplish more on our journey toward extended workplace excellence,” People and Culture Deputy Director Dr. Robert Boggs said. “We’re not totally there yet and we have more work to do but we’ll improve with your help and involvement.”The survey’s theme is Your Voice is Our Future. While that future may include a different commander at the helm, King reflected on his past two years at Land and Maritime and the impact it had on his life and career. “I’ve felt nothing but absolute love and gratitude my whole time that I’ve been here. I truly appreciate how great your performance is, and I’ve loved being in this command and being in Columbus.” The DLA Culture Survey 2016 began March 29 and runs through April 29.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2444 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2444

To require the approval and implementation by the Secretary of Commerce 
 of a rule to provide a moratorium for a temporary period on the entry 
of new vessels into certain groundfish, crab, and halibut fisheries in 
                           the North Pacific.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 20 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

Mr. Gorton (for himself and Mr. Stevens) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the approval and implementation by the Secretary of Commerce 
 of a rule to provide a moratorium for a temporary period on the entry 
of new vessels into certain groundfish, crab, and halibut fisheries in 
                           the North Pacific.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North Pacific Vessels Entry 
Moratorium Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF MORATORIUM.

    (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Commerce shall, by not later than October 15, 1994, approve and 
implement the proposed rule to establish a moratorium for a temporary 
period on the entry of new vessels into certain groundfish, crab, and 
halibut fisheries in the North Pacific and Bering Sea published on June 
3, 1994 at 59 Federal Register 28827.
    (b) The moratorium in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until 
December 31, 1997, or until the Secretary approves an amendment to such 
moratorium prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council in 
accordance with the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
(16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), whichever is earlier.
                                 <all>
```
# DLA Aviation at Oklahoma employees build skills during deployments

/ Published June 12, 2023
Richmond, Va., 
It’s not unusual for Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Oklahoma employees to support warfighters with overseas deployments. Aaron Korstjens and Rachel Vardaman spent their recent deployments developing new skills that will help them continue to support stateside customers.

Korstjens, a sustainment specialist within the Strategic Acquisition Programs Directorate, deployed as a warfighter support representative, commonly referred to as WSR, in support of the 1st Theater Sustainment Command and New York Army National Guard’s 369th Sustainment Brigade, in Kuwait from September 2022 to March 2023.

“As a WSR, my primary duties were to serve as the face of DLA to the customer and support them in all classes of supply,” Korstjens said.

Support consisted of ensuring the customer had sufficient inventory of repair items, for which Korstjens produced an equipment status report and provided status updates. To speed up delivery of backordered items, he worked with supply support activities across the globe to procure items for lateral support and collaborated with stateside DLA personnel to expedite shipments and the awarding of purchase orders and requests.

“I learned a lot of skills that have assisted me with being better at researching and pulling information from sources that I wouldn’t have known about had I not been exposed to others who were willing to share that information,” he said.

Korstjens said he appreciated learning to pivot workloads when priorities changed quickly, common in forward deployed AORs. “For me, one of the best ways to be able to do that was to become incredibly good at being meticulous and organized. Beyond that, you learn patience and consideration for your teammates.”

Vardaman, a customer support specialist also deployed to Kuwait, providing administrative support to the DLA Commander and Deputy Commander.

“I assisted in setting up incoming personnel with badges, lodging, and connectivity. I also set up meetings, booked conference rooms, prepared for visits and made sure our vehicles received scheduled maintenance, inspections and repairs,” Vardaman said.

Deployment for Vardaman was an opportunity to gain a better understanding of how important every aspect of DLA is, and how working directly with the military provides a greater understanding of how DLA personnel support the warfighter.

She said her Kuwait assignment was more relaxed than her first deployment. “My very first deployment was in Afghanistan, so that was hostile territory.”
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1685]



[[Page 3730]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-1167-000]


UtiliCorp United Inc.; Notice of Filing

January 20, 1998.
    Take notice that on December 22, 1997, UtiliCorp United Inc. 
(UtiliCorp) filed service agreements with Continental Energy Services 
for service under its Non-Firm Point-to-Point open access service 
tariff for its operating divisions, WestPlains Energy-Kansas and 
WestPlains Energy-Colorado.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before February 2, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1685 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-5428.

#### In re Lester Jon Ruston, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 295,

178 L. Ed. 2d 258,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7720.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis *259denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33961-33962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration


Working Group Studying Retirement Plan Leakage--Cashing in Your 
Future From ERISA Employer-Sponsored Pension Plans Advisory Council on 
Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 8, 1998, of the 
Retirement Plan Leakage--Cashing in Your Future--Working Group of the 
Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans. The 
group is studying pre-retirement distributions, including in-service 
distributions, hardship loans and participant loans from ERISA 
employer-sponsored pension plans.
    The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 9:30 a.m. to 
approximately noon in Room N-4437 C&D, U.S. Department of Labor 
Building, Second and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20210, is 
for Working Group members to continue gathering statistical information 
and/or to take additional testimony on the import of these ``pension 
preservation'' issues.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to the topic by submitting 20 copies on or before July 2, 
1998, to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, 
U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, D.C. 20210. Individuals or representatives of organizations 
wishing to address the Working Group should forward their request to 
the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations 
will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement may

[[Page 33962]]

be submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who need 
special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by July 2, 
1998, at the address indicated in this notice.
    Organizations or individuals also may submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before July 2.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 16th day of June, 1998.
Olena Berg,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-16562 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M