alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Details 

Westar Marine Services 

Document ID: USCG-2001-10486-0261 Document Type: Public Submission

This is comment on Notice: Standards for Living Organisms in Ships' Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. Waters; Draft Programmatic 

Environmental Impact Statement (Federal Register Publication) 

Docket ID: USCG-2001-10486 RIN: 1625-AA32

Topics: No Topics associated with this document

View Document:

Westar Marine Services wishes to comment on Docket USCG-2001-10486 regarding the 28 August 2009 notice of proposed rulemaking on 

Ballast Water Treatment Standards. Westar owns and operates 18 tugboats, 8 crew boats, and 18 barges in the San Francisco Bay area. On 

rare occasions, we may have to ballast a deck barge using municipal (potable) water, and thus we may be affected by these regulations. 

Westar is an active member of the American Waterways Operators which is the national trade association for the tug and barge industry. 

We fully support the comments submitted by the American Waterways Operators regarding this docket. Our deck barges that would be 

affected by these proposed regulations do not have ballast piping or pumps installed. They are filled and emptied with potable water using 

hoses and portable pumps. We do not know of any ballast water treatment systems that are designed for this type of use. In our opinion, 

the chances of introducing an invasive species with potable water used as ballast are nil. For our situation, any required ballast water 

treatment system would be worthless and a waste of scare resources for a low-margin company. We are very concerned with regulatory 

initiatives that mandate equipment that is not available in the marine marketplace. These regulations impose an economic burden on a 

company such as ours with no corresponding environmental benefit. This opinion is based both on practical experience with barge

operations and on common sense. We also believe that the Coast Guard has not adequately assessed the costs and effects that these 

regulations will have on individual companies or the entire tugboat and barge industry. We recommend that the Coast Guard follow the 

recommendations provided by the American Waterways Operators in their comments to this docket. 

Show Details

Docket Folder Summary Page 1 of 1

http://www.regulations.gov/ 11/10/2011
No. 09-10788.

#### Rafael Pileta Colman, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 852, 131 S. Ct. 389,

178 L. Ed. 2d 67,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6204,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
#### Com. v. Johnson

04/20/2016

915 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 478
No. 09-11275.

#### Kenroy Gladden, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 951, 131 S. Ct. 171,

178 L. Ed. 2d 248,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7714.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 97 and 369 Fed. Appx. 190.
No. 10-5570.

#### James Cross, Petitioner v. Jim Benedetti, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 929, 131 S. Ct. 320,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7336.

178 L. Ed. 2d 208,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 92-1612.

#### Southern Pacific Transportation Co. et al. *v.*Interstate Commerce Commission et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. *951Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth McMichael, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 880]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered September 8, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed points for defendant’s continuing course of sexual abuse against his daughters. In any event, regardless of whether defendant’s correct point score is 105 or 85 points, he remains a level two offender, and we find no basis for a downward departure *(see People v Gillotti,*23 NY3d 841 [2014]). There were no mitigating factors that were not adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or outweighed by aggravating factors, including defendant’s criminal history and failure to register as a sex offender in the state where the underlying crimes were committed.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Renwick, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.
No. 10-6069.

#### Bobby Macomber, Petitioner v. Hawaii, et al.

562 U.S. 970, 131 S. Ct. 479,

178 L. Ed. 2d 303,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8104.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-11549.

#### Delio Romanes, Petitioner v. Florida, et al.

562 U.S. 887, 131 S. Ct. 218,

178 L. Ed. 2d 131,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6789.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
2016-1794.

#### C.J.W.B. v. Bd. of Nursing.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-35.

French, J., not participating.
No. 10-5776.

#### Willie Curry, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 937, 131 S. Ct. 344,

178 L. Ed. 2d 223,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7397.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*224Same case below, 597 F.3d 936.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
ARTHUR A. GENOVESE, III, ) DOC #Y09175, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3047 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed April 5, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; George C. Richards, Judge. Arthur A. Genovese, III, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. KHOUZAM, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
2017-0324.

#### State v. Gill.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-110473 and C-110483.

Fischer, J., not participating.
No. 10-6055.

#### Ismael F. Arnaiz, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 944, 131 S. Ct. 367,

178 L. Ed. 2d 236,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7380,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
#### Schottland v Brown Harris Stevens Brooklyn, LLC

2d Dept: 137 AD3d 997

denied
No. 10-5462.

#### Joe Teague, Petitioner v. North Carolina Department of Transportation.

562 U.S. 923, 131 S. Ct. 303,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7222,

178 L. Ed. 2d 197,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.
No. 09-11346.

#### Kelvin M. Jones, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 981, 131 S. Ct. 413,

178 L. Ed. 2d 322,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8264.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 477.
No. 09-1359.

#### Rikard Krasniqi, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 947, 131 S. Ct. 92,

178 L. Ed. 2d 242,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7732.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 577.
No. 09-11563.

#### Eddie M. Johnson, Petitioner v. Colorado.

562 U.S. 888, 131 S. Ct. 221,

178 L. Ed. 2d 133,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6849.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
No. 10-5414.

#### Gregory L. Roberson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 920, 131 S. Ct. 293,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7123.

178 L. Ed. 2d 192,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 362 Fed. Appx. 235.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2372 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2372

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To reauthorize for three years the Commission on Civil Rights, and for 
                            other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2372

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize for three years the Commission on Civil Rights, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Rights Commission 
Reauthorization Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 7 of the United States Commission on Civil Rights Act (42 
U.S.C. 1975e) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 7. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act 
$9,500,000 for fiscal year 1995.''.

SEC. 3. TERMINATION.

    Section 8 of the United States Commission on Civil Rights Act (42 
U.S.C. 1973f) is amended by striking ``1994'' and inserting ``1997''.

            Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day, September 
      12), 1994.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 18
- 00711
- CV

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Appellant

v. City of Cleburne, Texas , and Johnson County, Texas, Appellee s

FROM THE 126TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- GN
- 16
- 005692, THE HONORAB LE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties before the Court have jointly filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for
want of jurisdiction due to a settlement resolvi ng all relevant issues

. H a ving reviewed the motion and the record, we grant the mo tion and render judgment dismissing this appeal as moot.

__________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose , Justices Triana and Smith
Di smissed on Joint Motion
Filed: February 6 , 20 20
No. 10-6407.

#### Glen Lewis, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 987, 131 S. Ct. 429,

178 L. Ed. 2d 333,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8161.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 376.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Cedric Kushner, the Chief Executive Officer of Cedric Kushner Promotions,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc. and will be retained by Cedric
Kushner Promotions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

/s/ Cedric Kushner
------------------
Name: Cedric Kushner
Title: Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



Date: August 16, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15983]



[[Page 32900]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,409]


Wiegand Appliance (Division of Emerson Electric); Vernon, AL; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on April 6, 1998 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at Wiegand Appliance, Division of 
Emerson Electric, Vernon, Alabama.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose; and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 29th day of May 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-15983 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### People v Modeste

2d Dept: 144 AD3d 1177 (Queens)

denied 3/21/17 (Garcia, J.)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30807 Summary Calendar

LINDA F. MITCHELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(98-CV-1450)

-------------------- February 3, 2000

Before POLITZ, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-Appellant Linda Mitchell appeals from the district

cou rt’s judgment affirming the denial of her application for

supplemental security income. She argues that the district court

applied an improper legal standard to conclude that she was not

prejudiced by the Administrative Law Judge's (“ALJ”) refusal to

order a consultative mental examination, that the ALJ erred in

applying the Medical-Vocational Guidelines because the Guidelines

fail to take into account her non-exertional impairments, and that

the district court erred in modifying the Commissioner's decision2

by concluding that she retained the ability to perform the full

range of sedentary work and was therefore not ent itled to

disability benefits.

We have reviewed the record and find that the district court

did not err in concluding that Mitchell did not carry her burden of

showing that she was prejudiced by the ALJ’s failure to order a

consultative mental examination. S e e Kane v. Heckler , 731 F.2d

1216, 1220 (1984). Neither did the ALJ commit a legal error in

applyin g the Guidelines after determining that Mitchell's nonexertional impairments did not significantly affect her resid ual

functional capacity to work. S ee Selders v. Sullivan

, 914 F.2d 614

(5 th Cir. 1990). Nor did the district court err in modifying the

Commissioner's decision by applyi ng a different Guideline to

conclude that Mitchell retains the residual functional capacity to

perform the full range of sedentary work; and that decision is

supported by substantial evidence in the record. S ee Mays v.

Bowen , 837 F.2d 1362, 1364 (5th Cir. 1988).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16055]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Tennessee Valley Authority (Meeting No. 
1505).

TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m. (CDT), June 18, 1998.

PLACE: Clarksville Department of Electricity, Community Room, 2021 
Wilma Rudolph Boulevard, Clarksville, Tennessee.

STATUS: Open.

Agenda

    Approval of minutes of meeting held on May 27, 1998.

New Business

B--Purchase Award
    B1. Contract with Porter Walker, Inc., to provide nonpower hand 
tools for all TVA locations.
    B2. Contract with Tool-Smith, Inc., to provide power tools for all 
TVA locations.
E--Real Property Transactions
    E1. Nineteen-year commercial recreation lease to GLM, Inc., 
affecting approximately 83.96 acres of Kentucky Lake land in Calloway 
County, Kentucky (Tract Nos. XGIR-60PT and -61PT), and amendment to the 
Kentucky Reservoir Land Management Plan.
    E2. Nineteen-year commercial recreation lease to Erwin Ehrenberg 
for the Cedar Point Recreation Area, affecting approximately 28.12 
acres of Normandy Lake land in Coffee County, Tennessee (Tract No. 
XNRMR-6L).
    E3. Nineteen-year commercial recreation lease to Claudia A. 
Holbrook, doing business as Greenlee Campground, R.V. & Marine, 
affecting approximately 7.21 acres of land on Cherokee Lake in Grainger 
County, Tennessee (Tract No. XCK-579L).
F--Unclassified
    F1. Approval to file condemnation cases in connection with the 
acquisition of permanent easements and rights-of-way for electric power 
transmission lines at the Freeport-Miller Tap to Mitchell's Corner line 
near Olive Branch in DeSoto County, Mississippi, and the Apalachia-
Ocoee transmission line in Polk County, Tennessee.

Information Items

    1. Delegation of authority to the Vice President, Fuel Supply and 
Engineering, to extend term coal Contract No. P-87P07-115632 with 
Pittston Coal Sales Company for John Sevier Fossil Plant.
    2. Approval to file condemnation cases: The affected transmission 
lines are Oneida-McCreary, McCreary County, Kentucky; Maury-Radnor No. 
2 Tap to Rally Hill, Maury County, Tennessee; and Wallaceville-
Chickamauga transmission line, Walker County, Georgia.
For more information: Please call TVA Public Relations at (423) 632-
6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. Information is also available at TVA's 
Washington Office (202) 898-2999.

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
Edward S. Christenbury,
General Counsel and Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16055 Filed 6-12-98; 9:38 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-M
# Employees surpass annual food drive goal fourth year in a row

/ Published Sept. 18, 2015
PHILADELPHIA,
•

MIS: 530 ,.,

State Authority to Regulate Non-Indian Ilazardous Waste

Management on Indian Lands

Charles E. Findley, Director

Hazardous Waste Divisfon (I-l/S liil'",GEO~"',-, .. ..-t..~.:.._.........''';"'~-. _. ,".". .:.. :~l,

JlIIl'oCS C. Moore

Office of Regional Counsel (M/S 613)

In a ~orandum dated July 26, 1985, the Hazardous Waste Division

(HWD) requested that the Office of Regional Counsel (ORC) review and

comment on an addendum to the Attorn~ General's Statement to be submitted

as part of the Washington State Department of Ecology Official Application _ for Ffnal Authorization (attached). -'...

Among other things, this addendum discusses State of WlIShin~on _.. verSus Environmental Protection Agency, 752, f2d 1465 (5th C1r.85)~ !If"

concern is the Assfstant Attorney General's subsequent assertion that the

state's application continues to present a regulato'"y program covering hazardous waste management by non-Indians on Indian lands.

We are requesting that ORC, in coordination wfth the Office of

General Counsel, review this position and determine EPA's position with

regard to final authorization.

An EPA tentative determination on Washington's Rpplicatfon is .. scheduled for early November, 1985. We are subsequently requesting that

ORC provide a decision with regard to final authorization by no later than

OCtober 11, 1985. Questions regarding this request should be directed to

Ilichael Bussell at extension 2857.

'."

bec: Ted

Deborah Rogl*skf, Gates,

ORC

ORCJ"( l.,)/~~

•

r:-- c,M·\,.;'" i)J . WMB:M.BUS~11:b.cane:4 08H 8/15/85 ;?Jt> Fef e
EXHIBIT 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Form S-3 (File No. 333-02071) and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-45963, 33- 49311, 33-55079, 333-57175, 333-70921, 333-67523, 333-61138, 333-39842, 333-101395, 333-115370, 333-122650 and 333-125851) of Dow Jones & Company, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.





|                              
|------------------------------
|                              
|                              
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|New York, New York            
|February 28, 2007
No. 10-5900.

#### David W. Wilson, Petitioner v. L. M. Zafra, et al.

562 U.S. 983, 131 S. Ct. 417,

178 L. Ed. 2d 325,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8289.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 784.
# Employee Reflection: Poma Darasamay

/ Published April 28, 2022

                Property Disposal Specialist Poma Darasamay, of the DLA Disposition Services site in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.                            220428-D-D0441-4321                            Property Disposal Specialist Poma Darasamay, of the DLA Disposition Services site in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Courtesy photoVIRIN: 220428-D-D0441-4321**What do you do?**

I manage the Reutilization, Transfer, and Donation (RTD) program for DLA Disposition Services Pearl Harbor. 

**How long have you worked for the federal government, including military service?**

15 years. I served eight years active duty in the Air Force prior to becoming a federal civilian employee.

**How long have you worked for DLA Disposition Services?**

I started in January 2020.

**What do you like about DLA Disposition Services?**

The amazing people we have at DLA Disposition Services, Pearl Harbor. The camaraderie our team has makes coming to work fun every day!

**What part of the job gives the most satisfaction?**

Knowing that at any given moment we are helping the local community (SASP), LESO, CFL, providing humanitarian relief, COVID relief, and assisting the Department of Defense in operations both here in Hawaii and around the world. 

**Advice you received worth passing on?**

Learn! Don’t just settle for the position you are in today. When you find downtime, learn someone else’s job. 

**Your noteworthy contributions this past year?**

Humanitarian relief efforts and COVID support. 

**What was your first job?**

Working in my dad’s butcher shop.

**Biggest influence?**

My family. They push me to succeed and be the best person possible. They support me when I succeed and pick me up even higher when I fail. With my family’s support and love, anything is possible!

**Any recent book favorites?**

Why read when you can watch the movie? My favorite book is*The Notebook.*

**Interests or passions outside work?**

Spending time with family. However, if anyone truly knows me, my true passion is eating – what can I say, I love food!

**Any favorite quotes?**

This is a hard question; I have lots of favorites.

*“Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail*.” – Ralph Waldo Emerson

**Any heroes?**

My parents, they were refugees from the Vietnam War. They gave up everything to give my family a better life!

**If you could choose to do anything for a day, what would it be?**

Boss around DLA Disposition Services Pacific Director Mr. Faron Cordrey.