alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Slip Op. 99-17 

## UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

: AMERICAN SILICON TECHNOLOGIES, : ELKEM METALS COMPANY, GLOBE : METALLURGICAL, INC., and : SKW METALS & ALLOYS, INC., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Before: MUSGRAVE, JUDGE : Court No. 96-10-02313 UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : and : : COMPANHIA FERROLIGAS MINAS : GERAIS-MINASLIGAS and : ELETROSILEX BELO HORIZONTE, : : Defendant-Intervenors. : :

JUDGMENT Upon having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) Silicon Metal From Brazil, Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand , American Silicon Technologies v. United States , Court No. 96-10-02313, Slip Op. 98-110 (July 30, 1998) (“ Remand Results ”) filed December 16, 1998, upon finding that Commerce complied with the Court’s remand order, and upon review of Plaintiffs’ Comments on Department of Commerce Final Remand Results, it is herebyCourt No. 96-10-02313 Page 2

ORDERED that the Remand Results are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further ORDERED that, all other issues having been decided, this case is dismissed.

_______________________________ R. KENTON MUSGRAVE JUDGE Dated: February 17, 1999 New York, New York
# DLA supervisor shares deployment experience as resiliency lesson

/ Published March 15, 2016
RICHMOND, Virginia,
#### Nafissatou D., Matter of, v Ibrahima B.

1st Dept: 149 AD3d 517

denied*
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34406-34407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16839]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 12 noon, Monday, June 29, 1998.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Proposed amendments to the Voluntary Guide to Conduct for 
Federal Reserve System Officials. (This item was originally announced 
for a closed meeting on June 22, 1998.)
    2. Federal Reserve Bank and Branch director appointments.
    3. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    4. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement that not only 
lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information 
about the meeting.


[[Page 34407]]


    Dated: June 19, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-16839 Filed 6-19-98; 4:04 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-M
No. 10-61.

#### Steven Dworkin, et al., Petitioners v. John F. Tamburo, dba Man’s Best Friend Software, et al.

562 U.S. 1029, 131 S. Ct. 567,

178 L. Ed. 2d 413,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8670.

November 8, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

*414Same case below, 601 F.3d 693.
#### City of Jacksonville, a Municipal Corporation, and John Fowler, as Commissioner of Buildings, also known as Inspector of Buildings, for said City, *Plaintiffs in Error,*vs. State of Florida, ex rel., Alex H. Stephens, *Defendant in Error.*

144 So. 656.

Division A.

Decision filed November 22, 1932.

*Austin Miller*and *Emmet Safay,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*P. H. Odom,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the Order herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said Order; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Whitfield, P.J. and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2485 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 2485

To amend the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 
    to delay the effective date of trucking deregulation for 1 year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

 Mr. Domenici (for himself and Mr. Bingaman) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 
    to delay the effective date of trucking deregulation for 1 year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 601(d) of 
the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 is 
amended by striking ``January 1, 1995''and inserting ``January 1, 
1996''.
                                 <all>
```
[72 NE3d 565, 50 NYS3d 30]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darrion B. Freeman, Appellant.

Decided March 23, 2017

*927APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender,*Rochester *(James A. Hobbs*of counsel), for appellant.

*928
      *Sandra Doorley, District Attorney,*Rochester *(Robert J. Shoemaker*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, defendant’s plea vacated, that portion of his motion which requested suppression of tangible property and statements obtained following the entry into defendant’s residence granted, the first and second counts of the indictment dismissed, and the case remitted to County Court for further proceedings on the third count of the indictment. Applying the factors outlined by this Court in *People v Gonzalez*(39 NY2d 122, 127 [1976]), we hold, consistent with the reasoning of the Appellate Division dissent, that the record lacks support for the conclusion of the courts below that defendant voluntarily consented to the entry and search of his home.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, defendant’s plea vacated, that portion of his motion which requested suppression of tangible property and statements obtained following entry into defendant’s residence granted, the first and second counts of the indictment dismissed, and case remitted to County Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings on the third count of the indictment, in a memorandum.
# Leading the way with supply

/ Published July 21, 2022
JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS, Va., 
Major operations and events require precise management of supplies and goods. For the 480th Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Wing and the 497th Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Group, the Distributed Common Ground System mission is amplified by the efforts of the 10th Intelligence Support Squadron’s materiel management Airmen also known as supply Airmen.Supply's core competencies tie into the DCGS mission by supporting the intel Airmen to produce actionable intelligence from data collected by the Air Force's primary intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance weapon system. Working as the repair and receiving center, the 10th ISS supply Airmen: ship, dispose, and accept both serviceable and unserviceable parts in a timely manner. Their efforts allow for the upkeep and employment of global communications to multiple intelligence platforms and sensors, such as the MQ-9 Reaper, RQ-4 Global Hawk and MQ-1 Predator. The seven member team work together to keep everything moving smoothly. Everyone does their part to help with the mission, which includes an NCOIC that manages the shop and ensures everyone abides by Air Force Instruction and Department of Defense regulations. The team compliments each other’s strengths, spanning from administrative tasks to proper disposal.“Working for intel is so different from traditional supply,” said Staff Sgt. Chanel Licorish, 10th ISS. “From the language, to the regulations, simple everyday procedures, as well as the weapon system, we support it all. It is very interesting to see how different supply can be depending on who you are catering to. This is definitely a fluid career field with a lot of range. I never thought I would be working for an intel squadron while in this career field.”The supply team assist a variety of organizations for different purposes. Their duties span from suppling facility managers, guard, reserve, and unit deployment manager teams with courtesy storage for their assets, to the cybersecurity team in the removal and disposal of equipment. They are a constant safeguard of material to many different organizations in the DCGS realm.“The biggest difference is what type of assets we are supplying,” said Senior Airman Aaron Smithson, 10th ISS. “In traditional supply we are managing aircraft parts, rather for the intel community we are managing weapon system assets.”The 10th ISS supply Airmen are the behind the scenes people that enable the global DCGS mission. They ensure assets that need repair and disposal are shipped to the appropriate places which ensures the avoidance of work stoppage and continued mission readiness. They work hard but they play hard and continue to lead the way with supply.

*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 16th Air Force website.*
# C_2015221EN.01000801.xml

| 6.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/8

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Senz Technologies BV v OHIM — Impliva (Umbrellas)

(Case T-22/13 and T-23/13) (1)

1

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing umbrellas - Grounds for invalidity - Disclosure of earlier design - American patent as earlier design - Circles specialised in the sector concerned - Informed user - Degree of attention of an informed user - Fashion accessories - Degree of freedom of the designer - Individual character - Different overall impression - Invalidity proceedings))

(2015/C 221/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Senz Technologies BV (Delft (Netherlands)) (represented initially by: W. Hoyng and C. Zeri, and subsequently by W. Hoyng and I. de Bruijn, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: F. Mattina, and subsequently by A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Impliva BV (Mijdrecht (Netherlands)) (represented by: C. Gielen and A. Verschuur, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Actions brought against two decisions of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 September 2012 (Cases R 2453/2010-3 and R 2459/2010-3), in relation to invalidity proceedings between Impliva BV and Senz Technologies BV.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decisions of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 September 2012 (Cases R 2453/2010-3 and R 2459/2010-3); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decisions of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 September 2012 (Cases R 2453/2010-3 and R 2459/2010-3);

| 2. | Orders Impliva BV to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs of Senz Technologies BV; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Impliva BV to bear its own costs and to pay one third of the costs of Senz Technologies BV;

| 3. | Orders Senz Technologies to bear two thirds of its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Senz Technologies to bear two thirds of its own costs;

| 4. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.

1

---
No. 10-5952.

#### Eddie Martinez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 942, 131 S. Ct. 362,

178 L. Ed. 2d 234,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7400.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 600 F.3d 971.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:See attached designation of agent form.
1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 I S 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 24 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 34

. 35

- 3 6 3 7

• I • 3 8 3 9 SCOT TMORRI S F A AOFFIC

E O FREGIONA LCOUNSE L 160 1 L!NDAVE,S W RENTON , WASHINGTO N 9805 7 TELEPHONE : 425/227-141 7 FACSIMILE : 425/227-100 7 

### CtmRTMENTO F IRAMSPORTATIO N ;0(jK£ TOPERATION ! 

### JU L

### I

_



# *EAf?W G DOCKE T

m i JA M - 3 AW

- 2 b

UNITE D STATE S O FAMERIC A NATIONA LTRANSPORTATIO N SAFET Y BOAR D OFFIC E O FADMINISTRATIV E LA WJUDGE S

WASHINGTON , D.C

.
ADMINISTRATOR , Federal Aviatio n Administration , Complainan t

vs
. SkyWes t Airlines , Inc. , Responden t FA A Docke t No

. CP09NM001 2 DM S No

. FAA-2009-097 9 FA A Cas e No

. 2009NM06004 2 NOTIC E O FAPPEA L

NOTIC E O FAPPEA L.';:,•:-.:.•.• • Pursuant to 1 4 C.F.R

. § 13.233 , Complainant , b y andthroug hit s undersigne d
counsel , hereb y submit s thi s Notic e o f its inten t t o appea l th e initial Decisio n o f
Administrativ e La

w Judg e Richar

dC

. Goodwin , sei-ve

dJun e 24 , 2011

.

DATE D thi s 1'

^ da y o f July , 2011

.

'if

- 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 7 4 8 4 9 5 0 5 1 5 2 5 3 EA A Attorne y

i;•'•'• ; i;. ' ' • ' • :

\' ' • '

• • • '* ' ^ * i J ; • -i::!! , i O

SkyWes t Airlines-Notic e o f

Appeal I'A A Docke t No

. CP09NM000I2/FA A Cas e No;;2009NM060042 , fag c I or 2 SCOTTR

. MORRIS , F/\ AATTORNE Y TEL i 425.227.1417 ; FAX : 425.227.100 71

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 14 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9

. 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 3 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 7 4 8 4 9 5 0 5 1 5 2 5 3 CERTIFICATE OFSERVIC E I hert;by certif

y tha t th e foregoin g Notic e o f

Appeal ha s been serve dvi afacsimil e andCertifie d Mai l - Retur

n Receip t Requeste dthi s date , t o th e following :

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbur Wrigh t Building , Suite 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docket

Clerk , AGC-43 0 FAX : (202 ) 493-514 2
Th e Honorabl e RichardC

. Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S

. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 FAX : (202 ) 366-753 6
ToddC

. Emerson , Esq

. Director , Governmen t

andLega l Affair s SkyWes t Airline s 44 4 Sout hRiver Roa d St

. George , U

T 8479 0 TEL : (435)634-353 0 FAX : (435 ) 634-350 5

DATE D thi s 1s

t da y o f July , 2011

.

MOIFAIRCHI N Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l (ANM-7 ) Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 160 1 LindAve

. S W Renlon , W

A 9805 7 (425)227-216 0

SkyWes i Airlines-Notic e o f Appen I SCOTTR

. MORRIS , EA AATTOR^^E Y TEL : FA A Docket No

. CP09NM00012/FA A Cas e No

. 2009NM06n04 2 425.227.1417 ; FAX : 425.227.100 7 Paiie2of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 15, 2016

No. 04-16-00487-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.C., A CHILD,

Appellant

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015PA01162

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this appeal from a trial court’s order terminating appellant’s 

parental rights was due September 8, 2016. On volume of the reporter’s record was filed by 

reporter David Zarate on September 12, 2016. However, the volume filed by Mr. Zarate 

indicated it was volume two of the record. Mr. Zarate advised that volume one of the record was 

taken by court reporter Decline M. Benavides. After contacting Ms. Benavides, she filed a 

notification of late record stating that she had not been notified that an appeal had been filed until 

September 14, 2016. Accordingly, she has requested an additional fifteen days from the original 

due date to file the record. After reviewing the notification of late record, we GRANT Ms. 

Benavides’s request for an extension of time to file the record and ORDER her to file her 

portion of the reporter’s record in this court on or before September 23, 2016.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of September, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 122 (Thursday, June 25, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Arthritis Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Arthritis Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on August 7, 1998, 8 a.m. 
to 5 p.m.
    Location: Bethesda Holiday Inn, Versailles Ballrooms I and II, 8120 
Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD.
    Contact Person: Kathleen R. Reedy or LaNise S. Giles, Center for 
Drug Evaluation and Research (HFD-21), Food and Drug Administration, 
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-5455, or FDA Advisory 
Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the 
Washington, DC area), code 12532. Please call the Information Line for 
up-to-date information on this meeting.
    Agenda: The committee will discuss the safety and efficacy of new 
drug application 20-905 Arava (leflunomide, Hoechst Marion Roussel, 
Inc., Germany) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by July 30, 1998. 
Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between 
approximately 11 a.m. and 12 m. Time allotted for each presentation may 
be limited. Those desiring to make formal oral presentations should 
notify the contact person before July 30, 1998, and submit a brief 
statement of the general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish 
to present, the names and addresses of proposed participants, and an 
indication of the approximate time requested to make their 
presentation.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: June 15, 1998.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 98-16837 Filed 6-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-948]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, February 8, 2012; 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee 37830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melyssa P. Noe, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-90, 
Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 241-3315; Fax (865) 576-0956 or email: 
noemp@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The main meeting presentation will focus on the 
Fiscal Year 2014 budget request for the DOE Oak Ridge Environmental 
Management Program.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Oak Ridge, welcomes the 
attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will 
make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or 
special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact Melyssa P. Noe at least seven days in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Melyssa P. Noe at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received five days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Melyssa P. 
Noe at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will also be 
available at the following Web site: http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on January 13, 2012.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-948 Filed 1-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```