alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commander reflects fondly on time at DLA, wishes Troop Support continued success

/ Published June 16, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
Army Brig. Gen. Eric P. Shirley completed his tenure as the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support commander during a change of command ceremony on June 15 in Philadelphia.

DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic officiated the event that honored Shirley’s departure from DLA Troop Support after two years and recognized Troop Support’s accomplishments under his leadership.

“Brig. Gen. Shirley is an exceptional leader, and the Troop Support team has responded brilliantly under his watch,” said Skubic, “it’s even more impressive when you consider the unprecedented environment of the past two years: the lasting effects of COVID-19, the Afghanistan withdrawal, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, inflation, industrial base challenges.”

Shirley attributed his leadership success to the strength and dedication of the DLA Troop Support workforce, a group of individuals who often exceeded his expectations.

“I have been on some great teams, even historic teams deployed and in the homeland,” Shirley told the packed auditorium, but the “secret sauce” for DLA Troop Support is the people. The [Troop Support workforce] is a family and a proud one at that!”

The senior leaders of the organization also made a strong impression on Shirley, and he invited them to stay in contact with him.

 “Wherever I am in this world, I will always stop what I’m doing to pick up the phone for any leader in this outfit”, he said

Under Shirley’s command DLA Troop Support provided more than $19 billion annually worth of food, clothing and textiles, construction and equipment, pharmaceuticals, medical supplies and equipment, as well as industrial repair parts for America’s warfighters and other valued customers worldwide. To accomplish this mission, Shirley led a global workforce of more than 2,100 civilian and military personnel. Shirley’s new position is as the commanding general of the 1st Sustainment Command at U.S. Army Central in Fort Knox, Kentucky.

Shirley gave some parting words to his successor, Army Col. Landis Maddox.

“There is no better place for an Army brigadier to serve than here at [Troop Support]”, he said.

Maddox, a Texas native, comes to Troop Support with 27 years of experience as an Army logistician. His previous assignment was as the commander of the Joint Munitions Command, headquartered in Illinois at the Rock Island Arsenal.
No. 10-6565.

#### Alberto Jacobo Lara, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 991, 131 S. Ct. 438,

178 L. Ed. 2d 340,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8204.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 631.
#### In the Matter of Christopher Cocchiaraley, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Health et al., Respondents.

*633[64 NYS3d 605]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondent Anne E. Minihan, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, from enforcing an order dated May 18, 2017, in a proceeding entitled *Matter of Cocchiaraley v New York State Dept. of Health,*pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, under index No. 51119/17.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; *see Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]).

The petitioner has failed to establish a clear legal right to the relief sought.

Rivera, J.P., Leventhal, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Elizabeth A. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/  Elizabeth A. Murphy
------------------------

Elizabeth A. Murphy
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and will be retained by
Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-5945.

#### Jesus Olivas, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 942, 131 S. Ct. 361,

178 L. Ed. 2d 233,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7358.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 10-6483.

#### Anthony Garvins, Petitioner v. Dave Burnett, et al.

562 U.S. 1048, 131 S. Ct. 607,

178 L. Ed. 2d 443,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8812,

November 15, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5272.

#### Mario Cavin, Petitioner v. Hugh Wolfenbarger, Warden.

562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 269,

178 L. Ed. 2d 177,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6938.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# Defense Logistics Agency flu program protects DOD beneficiaries worldwide, meets Defense Health Agency needs

/ Published Feb. 20, 2024
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support’s medical supply chain flu team and DLA Distribution Center Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, successfully completed the 2023-2024 flu vaccine program Feb. 1 with a total shipment of over 3.2 million doses to military service customers.

Through multifaceted and synchronized efforts in the Department of Defense, the program ensures Defense Health Agency facilities around the world have vaccine supplies to keep the warfighter, and eligible dependents, protected from the virus.

The annual flu season is characterized by the prevalence of outbreaks, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Northern Hemisphere’s flu season is October through May, while Southern Hemisphere outbreaks are usually between April and September. DHA mandates all permanently and temporarily assigned military personnel receive the flu vaccine.

This flu season provided unusual challenges for the medical flu team to overcome, specifically adding additional doses to meet DOD’s Southern Hemisphere needs.

“We had quite a few last-minute requirements that created some challenges, especially for Southern Hemisphere flu [vaccines], with significantly more doses ordered,” said Medical Contract Officer Yu Chen. “However, we were able to meet all the requirements by working closely with the contractors, the [military] services and our planning and cold chain teams.”

DLA Troop Support and DLA Distribution teams remained in continuous communication to execute the program, including weekly stakeholder discussions to synchronize vendor delivery, prioritization requirements and shipping.

“There are always unusual challenges with each flu season, but the key to overcoming each specific challenge has constantly been collaboration among all team members,” said Pharmaceutical Distributor Integrated Supply Team Chief, Theresa Rucci.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2256

To exclude from Federal income taxation amounts received in settlement

of refund claims for State or local income taxes on Federal retirement

benefits which were not subject to State or local income taxation on

the same basis as State or local retirement benefits.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. ROBB introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To exclude from Federal income taxation amounts received

in settlement of refund claims for State or local income

taxes on Federal retirement benefits which were not subject to State or local income taxation on the same basis

as State or local retirement benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 2256 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR REFUNDS OF STATE OR LOCAL

2 INCOME TAXES ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE IM3 PROPER TAXATION OF FEDERAL RETIRE4 MENT BENEFITS.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—For purposes of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986, gross income shall not include any

7 amount (including interest) received after December 31,

8 1994, from a State in settlement of a claim for a refund

9 of State income taxes paid to such State which are attrib10 utable to the taxation of any protected retirement benefit

11 paid before January 1, 1990, in a manner inconsistent

12 with the manner required under Davis v. Michigan De13 partment of the Treasury, 489 U.S. 803 (1989).

14 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of subsection (a):

15 (1) PROTECTED RETIREMENT BENEFIT.—The

16 term ‘‘protected retirement benefit’’ means any re17 tirement benefit of an officer or employee referred to

18 in section 111 of title 4, United States Code.

19 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ includes any

20 political subdivision of a State and the District of

21 Columbia.

Æ
# Washington National Guard learns language of DLA food support

/ Published May 26, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

The Washington Army National Guard is learning a new language: Subsistence.When the Washington Army National Guard decided it needed a better way to provide food to guardsmen, it reached out to the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Subsistence team.Overseeing their own food contracts became a cumbersome process, said Master Sgt. Darrell DeGroff, Washington National Guard food program manager.But setting up support from the Subsistence supply chain has been a challenge. The number of guardsmen to feed fluctuates, depending on training events. That and the large number of delivery locations throughout the state makes it difficult for vendors to determine when, where and how often to make deliveries, said John Tolomeo, Subsistence customer operations supervisor.It’s similar to learning a new language or culture, said Patricia Scott, chief of Subsistence garrison feeding. DeGroff and his team had to learn to navigate the system Subsistence uses to order food. And Subsistence had to learn to understand the complexity of their new customer’s needs.A Subsistence team traveled to Washington in March to meet with DeGroff and participate in the Army National Guard’s annual Menu Board Meeting at Joint Base Lewis-McChord. DeGroff also took them on a tour around the state so they could better understand the various delivery locations.Subsistence began setting up ordering sites for the Washington National Guard in November 2015. They now support eight dining facilities and individual units, and more sites have been identified for the future.DeGroff said he has seen two major benefits in partnering with DLA so far.“One, the fact that DLA oversees the bidding process of the food program contracts. That’s a big one,” said DeGroff. “The other one ... when I got to visit an audit they did on one of the prime vendors, and they went through all the different products and showed us how picky they were about meeting specifications.”“Overall the (Subsistence) team shows me that they are very committed to finding a way to make it work,” said DeGroff.Subsistence provides support to Army National Guard and Air National Guard units in 30 states, as well as Puerto Rico and Guam.
# C_2013252EN.01002102.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/21

---

Action brought on 13 June 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-323/13)

2013/C 252/33

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin and A. Alcover San Pedro, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, since part of the municipal waste going to the landfills of the Rome SubATO (sotto ambito territoriale ottimale; the subdivision of the Optimal Territorial Ambit), including the Malagrotta landfill and those of the Latina SubATO, does not undergo treatment including a proper sorting of the various fractions of the waste and the stabilisation of the organic fraction, and since an integrated and adequate network of waste disposal installations, which takes account of the best available technology, has not been created in Lazio, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6(a) of Directive 1999/31/EC, (1) read in conjunction with Article 1(1) of Directive 1999/31/EC and with Articles 4 and 13 of Directive 2008/98/EC, (2) and under Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, since part of the municipal waste going to the landfills of the Rome SubATO (sotto ambito territoriale ottimale; the subdivision of the Optimal Territorial Ambit), including the Malagrotta landfill and those of the Latina SubATO, does not undergo treatment including a proper sorting of the various fractions of the waste and the stabilisation of the organic fraction, and since an integrated and adequate network of waste disposal installations, which takes account of the best available technology, has not been created in Lazio, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6(a) of Directive 1999/31/EC, (1) read in conjunction with Article 1(1) of Directive 1999/31/EC and with Articles 4 and 13 of Directive 2008/98/EC, (2) and under Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC;

1

2

| — | Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 1999/31/EC expired on 16 July 2001.

The period for transposing Directive 2008/98/EC expired on 12 December 2010.

---

(1)  Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste (OJ L 182, 16.7.1999 p. 1).

1

(2)  Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ L 312, 22.11.2008 p. 3).

2

---
No. 09-10527.

#### Derek Todd Fulbright, Petitioner v. D. L. Runnels, Warden.

562 U.S. 845, 131 S. Ct. 87,

178 L. Ed. 2d 55,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5980.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 362 Fed. Appx. 892.
# C_2013274EN.01003201.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/32

---

Action brought on 15 July 2013 — ZZ v EEA

(Case F-71/13)

2013/C 274/53

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis, and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Environment Agency (EEA)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision to reject the applicant’s request for an administrative inquiry to be opened to prove or clarify facts relating to harassment.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of 20 September 2012 by the authority empowered to conclude contracts (‘AECE’) rejecting the applicant’s request for an administrative inquiry to be opened to prove or clarify facts relating to harassment; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 20 September 2012 by the authority empowered to conclude contracts (‘AECE’) rejecting the applicant’s request for an administrative inquiry to be opened to prove or clarify facts relating to harassment;

| — | order the EEA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EEA to pay the costs.

---
S91A1249.

#### LIFE v. THE STATE.

(410 SE2d 421)

Decided November 27, 1991.

*Stephen L. Berry,*for appellant.

*Glenn Thomas, Jr., District Attorney, John B. Johnson III, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Mary H. Hines, Staff Attorney,*for appellee.

Hunt, Justice.

Lorianne Life killed her infant son shortly after his birth, and then concealed the body. She was convicted by a jury of murder and concealing the death of another. The trial court sentenced her to a life term on the murder charge and 12 months on the concealment charge.1

1. The evidence is sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to find that Life’s infant son was born alive, had a separate and independent existence from Life, was murdered by Life, and the body subsequently concealed by Life, all beyond a reasonable doubt. *Hall v. State,*243 Ga. 207, 209 (3) (253 SE2d 160) (1979); *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. We find no error in the trial court’s charge regarding the elements necessary to provide the homicide of an infant, nor in the trial court’s refusal to give Life’s request to charge regarding testimony of the medical examiner.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

1

 The defendant gave birth to twins, a boy and a girl, on August 13, 1990. The girl was stillborn, and the defendant killed her infant son shortly after his birth. She was indicted in Camden County for concealing the deaths of both infants (OCGA § 16-10-31) and for the murder of the infant boy. She was tried before a jury on March 26, 27 and 28,1991. The trial court directed a verdict of not guilty of concealing the death of the stillborn infant girl. The court reporter certified the transcript on June 13, 1991. Life filed her notice of appeal on April 24, 1991. The appeal was docketed in this court on June 21, 1991 and orally argued on September 18, 1991.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-217-001]


Gas Research Institute; Notice of Revised Refund Report

June 11, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 20, 1998, the Gas Research Institute (GRI) 
filed a revised report listing its 1997 refunds made to its pipeline 
members.
    GRI states that revised refunds, totaling $18,349,305 to twenty-
eight pipelines, were made in accordance with the Commission's 
September 27, 1996 Opinion No. 407 (76 FERC para. 61,337).
    GRI states that it has served copies of the filing to each person 
included on the Secretary's service listed in Docket No. RP96-267-000.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before June 18, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16038 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-5970.

#### In re Michael J. Pendleton, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 363,

178 L. Ed. 2d 258,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7733.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Companys chief executive officer certifies as follows:



(a) This Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



(b) The information contained in this Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/Lawrence N. SmithLawrence N. SmithChief Executive OfficerDate: November 10, 2003




-28-
# DLA Distribution San Joaquin, Calif., welcomes new commander

/ Published June 22, 2016
SAN JOAQUIN, California, 
Marine Corps Col. André T. Harrell assumed command of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution San Joaquin, Calif., in a ceremony on June 22.  The ceremony was officiated by DLA Distribution commander Army Brig. Gen. John S. Laskodi. 

Laskodi welcomed Harrell into the DLA Distribution family saying, “We only select the best to serve as commanders at our distribution centers.  André’s career history shows that he is a gifted leader and the right person to lead this organization.” 

Harrell was born in Brooklyn, N.Y. in 1970.  He graduated from August Martin High School in Jamaica, Queens, N.Y., in 1988 and later attended Jacksonville University, Jacksonville, Fla., where he received a Bachelor of Science degree in Aviation Management in 1993.  

He was commissioned a second lieutenant in the United States Marine Corps in 1993 from the Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps Program and became an aviation logistician after graduating from the Basic Qualification Course in 1994.  

Harrell’s tours and billet assignments include officer-in-charge, Materiel Management and Supply Response Division at Marine Aircraft Group 31 from 1994 to 1997, in which he also served as Marine Aviation Logistics Squadron (MALS) Detachment officer-in-charge, Aviano, Italy, from 1995 to 1996; military advisor to the Royal Saudi Marine Forces from 1997 to 1999; deputy director for the Marine Corps Total Force System from 2001 to 2004; department head (Aviation Supply) for MALS-39 from 2005 to 2007; deputy, Aviation Logistics Department (ALD),  3D Marine Aircraft Wing Forward, Al Asad, Iraq, from 2008 to 2009; commanding officer, MALS-39 from 2009 to 2011; deputy chief, Strategy and Policy, J5 Strategy, Plans, and Policy Directorate, U.S. Central Command from 2012 to 2014; Aviation Logistics Support Branch, Marine Aviation, HQMC Pentagon from 2014 to 2015; and assistant chief of staff, ALD, Second Marine Aircraft Wing from 2015 to 2016. 

Harrell has a Master of Science degree in Information Technology from the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif., a Master of Military Studies degree from the United States Marine Corps Command and Staff College in Quantico, Va., and a Master of Science degree in National Resource Strategy from the Industrial College of the Armed Forces in Washington, D.C. 

His personal decorations include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal (first oak leaf cluster), Meritorious Service Medal (gold star in lieu of fourth award), Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal, Joint Service Achievement Medal, Navy Achievement Medal, and the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal.