Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 120 /Tuesday, June 23, 1998 / Notices 34145

FTZ 40 was approved on September

29, 1978 (Board Order 135, 43 F.R.

46886, 10/11/78) and expanded in June

1982 (Board Order 194, 47 F.R. 27579,

6/25/82); April 1992 (Board Order 574,

57 F.R. 13694, 4/17/92); and, February

1997 (Board Order 870, 62 F.R. 7750, 2/

20/97). The zone project currently

consists of 5 sites in the Cleveland,

Ohio, area: Site 1 (94 acres)—port of

Cleveland complex on Lake Erie at the

mouth of the Cuyahoga River,

Cleveland; Site 2 (175 acres)—the IX

Center (formerly the ‘‘Cleveland Tank

Plant’’), in Brook Park, Ohio, adjacent to

Cleveland Hopkins International

Airport; Site 3 (1,900 acres)—Cleveland

Hopkins International Airport complex,

Cleveland; Site 4 (450 acres)—Burke

Lakefront Airport, 1501 North Marginal

Road, Cleveland, and Site 5 (97 acres)—

within the Emerald Valley Business

Park at the southeast corner of Cochran

Road and Beaver Meadow Parkway,

Glenwillow.

The applicant is now requesting

authority to expand existing Site 5 to

include the entire Emerald Valley

Business Park (298 acres, includes

existing areas) in Glenwillow and to

include 3 new sites (160 acres) in

Cuyahoga County (Proposed Sites 6–8):

Proposed Site 6 (30 acres)—Collinwood

site, South Waterloo (South Marginal)

Road and East 152nd Street, Cleveland;

Proposed Site 7 (47 acres)—Water

Tower Industrial Park, Coit Road and

East 140th Street, Cleveland; and,

Proposed Site 8 (83 acres)—Strongsville

Industrial Park, Royalton Road (State

Route 82), Strongsville. Proposed Sites

5, 6 and 8 are privately owned, while

Proposed Site 7 is owned by the State

of Ohio. No specific manufacturing

requests are bing made at this time.

Such requests would be made to the

Board on a case-by-case basis.

In accordance with the Board’s

regulations, a member of the FTZ Staff

has been designated examiner to

investigate the application and report to

the Board.

Public comment on the application is

invited from interested parties.

Submissions (original and 3 copies)

shall be addressed to the Board’s

Executive Secretary at the address

below. The closing period for their

receipt is August 24, 1998. Rebuttal

comments in response to material

submitted during the foregoing period

may be submitted during the subsequent

15-day period (to September 8, 1998).

A copy of the application and

accompanying exhibits will be available

for public inspection at each of the

following locations:

U.S. Department of Commerce, Export

Assistance Center, 600 Superior

Avenue, East, #700 Cleveland, Ohio

44114

Office of the Executive Secretary,

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room

3716, U.S. Department of Commerce,

14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,

Washington, DC 20230.

Dated: June 16, 1998.

Dennis Puccinelli,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–16683 Filed 6–22–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 30–98]

Foreign-Trade Zone 183—Austin,

Texas, Application for Expansion and

Request for Manufacturing Authority

(Servers and Work Stations)

An application has been submitted to

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board

(the Board) by the Foreign-Trade Zone

of Central Texas, Inc., grantee of FTZ

183, requesting authority to expand its

zone in the Austin, Texas area, and

requesting on behalf of Dell Computer

Corporation, authority to manufacture

servers and workstations under zone

procedures within FTZ 183 (Austin

Customs port of entry). The application

was submitted pursuant to the

provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones

Act, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u),

and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR

Part 400). It was formally filed on June

11, 1998.

FTZ 183 was approved on December

23, 1991 (Board Order 550, 57 FR 42, 1/

2/92). The zone currently consists of

seven sites in the Austin, Texas area:

Site 1—Austin Enterprise site (317

acres), consisting of seven parcels

within the Austin Enterprise Zone Area

along Highway 290 and the Ben White

Boulevard-Montopolis Drive area,

Austin;

Site 2—Balcones Research site (50

acres), located in north central Austin at

the intersection of Burnett Road and

Longhorn Boulevard;

Site 3—High Tech Corridor site (762

acres), consisting of ten parcels located

along I–35, 14 miles north of downtown

Austin (site straddles Austin-Round

Rock city line);

Site 4—Cedar Park site (122 acres),

some eight miles northwest of the

Austin city limits, in Williamson

County;

Site 5—Round Rock ‘‘SSC’’ site (246

acres), consisting of two parcels located

along I–35 between Chandler Road and

Westinghouse Road on the northern

edge of the City of Round Rock;

Site 6—Georgetown site (246 acres),

located along I–35 and U.S. 81, south of

downtown Georgetown;

Site 7—San Marcos site (40 acres),

located within the San Marcos

Municipal Airport facility in eastern

San Marcos, adjacent to State Highway

21, on the Hays County/Caldwell

County line.

(An expansion request (Doc. 63–97) is

currently pending with the FTZ Board

to expand FTZ 183 to include the MET

Center industrial park (200 acres)

located between U.S. Highway 183

South and State Highway 71 East in

southeast Austin.)

The applicant is now requesting

authority to expand Site 3 to include

574 acres approximately two miles

south of the High-Tech Corridor site,

just east of I–35 on Parmer Lane in the

City of Austin (Travis County) near the

Williamson County border. This

proposed expansion will expand the site

to 1,336 acres.

The application also requests

authority on behalf of Dell Computer

Corporation to manufacture servers and

workstations within FTZ 183 (within

the proposed expansion area). Dell is

already authorized to manufacture

computers and related products,

including servers and workstations,

under zone procedures within Subzone

183A. Dell is building a 300,000 square

foot facility (the ‘‘Enterprise Systems

Facility’’) within the proposed Site 3

expansion area, and plans to transfer a

portion of its manufacturing operations

to the new facilities to meet

requirements for additional capacity

required by its growing server and

workstation businesses. This proposal

does not request any new manufacturing

authority under FTZ procedures in

terms of products or components, but it

does involve a proposed increase in

Dell’s level of production under FTZ

procedures within the FTZ 183 project

overall corresponding to the proposed

increase in facilities.

In accordance with the Board’s

regulations, a member of the FTZ Staff

has been designated examiner to

investigate the application and report to

the Board.

Public comment on the application is

invited from interested parties.

Submissions (original and 3 copies)

shall be addressed to the Board’s

Executive Secretary at the address

below. The closing period for their

receipt is August 24, 1998. Rebuttal

comments in response to material

submitted during the foregoing period

may be submitted during the subsequent

15-day period (to September 8, 1998).

A copy of the application and

accompanying exhibits will be available
34146 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 120 /Tuesday, June 23, 1998 / Notices

for public inspection at each of the

following locations:

U.S. Department of Commerce, Export

Assistance Center 1700 Congress, 2nd

Floor, Austin, TX 78711

Office of the Executive Secretary,

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room

3716, U.S. Department of Commerce

14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20230.

Dated: June 12, 1998.

Dennis Puccinelli,

Acting Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–16682 Filed 6–22–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–489–602]

Acetylsalicylic Acid From Turkey; Final

Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final results of

antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: On April 30, 1998, the

Department of Commerce published the

preliminary results of its administrative

review of the antidumping duty order

on acetylsalicylic acid from Turkey.

This review covers one manufacturer/

exporter of the subject merchandise

during the period of review August 1,

1996, through July 31, 1997.

We gave interested parties an

opportunity to comment on our

preliminary results; however, we

received no comments. Therefore, these

final results of review are the same as

those presented in the preliminary

results of review. The review indicates

the existence of no dumping margin for

the manufacturer/exporter during this

period.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 23, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa

Tomlinson, David Dirstine, or Richard

Rimlinger, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone:

(202) 482–4733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Applicable Statute

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended (the Act), are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

to the Act by the Uruguay Rounds

Agreements Act. In addition, unless

otherwise indicated, all citations to the

Department of Commerce’s (the

Department’s) regulations are to the

regulations published on May 19, 1997

(62 FR 27296).

Background

On April 30, 1997, the Department

published in the Federal Register (63

FR 23720) the preliminary results of the

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on

acetylsalicylic acid from Turkey (52 FR

32030, August 25, 1987). The review

covers one company, Atabay Kimya

Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (AKS), a Turkish

manufacturer/exporter of the subject

merchandise. The Department has now

completed the administrative review in

accordance with section 751 of the Act.

Scope of Review

The product covered by this review is

acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) containing

no additives, other than inactive

substances (such as starch, lactose,

cellulose, or coloring material), and/or

active substances in concentrations less

than that specified for particular nonprescription drug combinations of

aspirin and active substances as

published in the Handbook of NonPrescription Drugs, eighth edition,

American Pharmaceutical Association,

and is not in tablet, capsule or similar

forms for direct human consumption.

This product is currently classified

under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule

(HTS) subheading 2918.22.10. The HTS

item number is provided for

convenience and customs purposes. The

written descriptions of the scope of this

proceeding remains dispositive.

Final Results of Review

We gave interested parties an

opportunity to comment on the

preliminary results of review, but we

received no comments. Therefore, the

final results of review are the same as

those presented in our preliminary

results. As a result of the review, we

determine that the weighted-average

dumping margin is as follows:

Manufacturer/exporter Margin (percent)

Atabay Kimya Sanayi ve

Ticaret A.S ............................ 0.00

The Department will issue

appraisement instructions directly to

the Customs Service. We will instruct

the Customs Service not to assess

antidumping duties on the merchandise

subject to review.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective for all

shipments of the subject merchandise

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date of the final results of

this administrative review, as provided

for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)

The cash deposit rate for AKS will be

zero percent; (2) for previously reviewed

or investigated companies not listed

above, the cash deposit rate will

continue to be the company-specific rate

published for the most recent period; (3)

if the exporter is not a firm covered in

this review, any prior review, or the

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV)

investigation, but the manufacturer is,

the cash deposit rate will be the rate

established for the most recent period

for the manufacturer of the

merchandise; and (4) if neither the

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm

covered in this or any previous review,

the cash deposit rate will be 32.98

percent. This is the ‘‘All Others’’ rate

from the LTFV investigation. (See

Antidumping Duty Order;

Acetylsalicylic Acid from Turkey, 52 FR

32030 (August 25, 1987).) These deposit

rates shall remain in effect until

publication of the final results of the

next administrative review.

This notice also serves as a final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under section

351.402(f)(2) of the Department’s

regulations to file a certificate regarding

the reimbursement of antidumping

duties prior to liquidation of the

relevant entries during this review

period. Failure to comply with this

requirement could result in the

Department’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred and the subsequent assessment

of doubled antidumping duties.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with sections

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

Dated: June 11, 1998.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 98–16681 Filed 6–22–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P