alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Employee Spotlight: Deleon Guadalupe Jr.  

/ Published April 11, 2024
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Employee Spotlight focuses on outstanding nonsupervisory Defense Logistics Agency personnel across DLA Aviation and at Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may nominate employees to be featured in this column by contacting DLA Aviation Public Affairs at*Avn.PAO@DLA.mil*.*

**Name:** Guadalupe Deleon Jr.

**Organization:****DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City**

**Years of service:** 7 years

**What is your job, and how do you support the warfighter?**I am a lead customer support specialist of the GE Engine Team, and we support the engines of multiple aircraft. If there is an engine needing a part, we find that material.

**What do you like most about your job and why?**The best thing about my job is leading my team to a high rate of performance in support of the warfighter. It gives me peace of mind knowing that we pushed to the limits to keep the engines maintainable and to get the aircraft back in the air.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction? Why?**I enjoy training my team of customer account specialists so that everyone learns to meet the challenges and succeed at our mission. Training to grow professionally and perform efficiently reflects on me as a leader.  

**What are some of your passions outside of work?**  The wife and I like working outside on the land we own. We also enjoy taking road trips to try different diners. Our son and daughter are grown, but my son comes home on gamedays to watch football. My daughter shares my passion for fitness and usually goes to the gym with me. She improves daily, and I enjoy the time with her and coaching her on what I know. Weightlifting is my stress reliever and how I clear my head from the day. When in the gym, I don’t think about anything but bettering myself.
2016-1726.

#### State v. Quinones.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104016, 2016-Ohio-7225.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.38  


 
  AMENDMENT ONE TO
  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT    
    



        This amendment (the "Amendment"), to the employment agreement entered into by and between William E. Sanford (the "Executive") and Interline Brands, Inc.
(the "Company"), dated as of August 13, 2004 (the "Employment Agreement"), is made and entered into as of December 2, 2004. 


 
 

W I T N E S S E T H:    
    


        WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have entered into the Employment Agreement, which provides for the terms
and conditions of the Executive's continued employment with the Company; and 



        WHEREAS, Section 5.10 of the Employment Agreement provides that the Executive shall be entitled to a retention bonus which shall be
computed pursuant to such formula and shall vest and be paid over such period as shall be negotiated in good faith and agreed upon between the Company and the Executive; and 


        WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have negotiated in good faith to determine the formula, vesting and payment of such retention bonus
in accordance with the Employment Agreement and have further determined it to be in the best interests of the Company and the Executive to amend Section 5.10 of the Employment Agreement as
herein provided. 


        NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 



	I.
	Section 5.10
of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 





5.10.    One Time Bonus. The effectiveness of this Section 5.10 shall be contingent upon and shall only become effective upon the date
of the closing of the Offering. On the date of the closing of the Offering, the Executive shall receive from the Company a one-time payment of $2,272,956 paid in cash. 



	II.
	All
other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.



	III.
	This
Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same
instrument. 




        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first above written. 



	 
	 	 

	EXECUTIVE	 	INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.
	

 By: William E. Sanford	
 	

 By:














QuickLinks


AMENDMENT ONE TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

W I T N E S S E T H
No. 10-6301.

#### John Napoli, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 974, 131 S. Ct. 490,

178 L. Ed. 2d 310,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7883.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 157.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7462

GENE ALLEN HERROLD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. E. GUNJA, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-01-1560-WMN)

Submitted: November 26, 2001 Decided: December 12, 2001

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gene Allen Herrold, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gene Allen Herrold appeals the district court’s order and

order on reconsideration denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Herrold v. Gunja,

No. CA-01-1560-WMN (D. Md. filed June 1, 2001, entered June 4,

2001; filed July 25, 2001, entered July 25, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-225.

#### Douglas R. Knutson, et ux., Petitioners v. City of Fargo, North Dakota.

562 U.S. 897, 131 S. Ct. 357,

178 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6101.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 600 F.3d 992.
SERVED: JUNE 13, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BELT MAKERS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0049 

HEARING NOTICE 

zen Jtm 1 l A g: 3 2 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered · 

on September 30, October 1, through noon on October 2, 2013, inclusive, in the U.S. 

Department of Labor Courtroom, Suite 5150, the Glenn M. Anderson Federal 

Building, 501 West Ocean Boulevard, Long Beach, CA. 90802. Hearings will 

commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

Michael L. Dworkin and Associates 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

TEL: 415-421-2500 

FAX: 415-421-2560 

Lisa J. Toscano, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7110 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0049 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
# C_2013252EN.01002301.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/23

---

Appeal brought on 1 July 2013 by Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 25 April 2013 in Case T-284/11: Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-374/13 P)

2013/C 252/38

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, abogado)

Appellant:

Otherparties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG

Otherparties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | Set aside the decision of the General Court of 25 April 2013 in case T-284/11, granting in consequence the registration of the Community Trademark Application no7 112 113‘METROINVEST’ to distinguish services in class 36. |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the decision of the General Court of 25 April 2013 in case T-284/11, granting in consequence the registration of the Community Trademark Application no7 112 113‘METROINVEST’ to distinguish services in class 36.

o

| — | Order the other parties to bear the costs of the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the other parties to bear the costs of the procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Appellant raises a single plea alleging the:

| — | Infringement of the Art. 8.1 b) of Regulation no 207/2009

   (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the Art. 8.1 b) of Regulation no 207/2009

   (1)

Infringement of the Art. 8.1 b) of Regulation no 207/2009

1

However this plea consists of four parts, which are the following:

| — | Error on the part of the General Court and on the part of OHIM in assessing the comparison of the signs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Error on the part of the General Court and on the part of OHIM in assessing the comparison of the signs.

| — | The General Court has not taken into account the applicable case law regarding the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion. |
| --- | --- |

—

The General Court has not taken into account the applicable case law regarding the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion.

| — | Lack of coherence with other Office resolutions in which the same parts, and related trademarks are involved. |
| --- | --- |

—

Lack of coherence with other Office resolutions in which the same parts, and related trademarks are involved.

| — | Pacific coexistence between other trademarks, which include the word METRO in different classes, and also in class 36. |
| --- | --- |

—

Pacific coexistence between other trademarks, which include the word METRO in different classes, and also in class 36.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark

1

OJ L 78, p. 1

---
No. 10-5657.

#### John Matthew Vera, Petitioner v. E. K. McDaniel, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 933, 131 S. Ct. 333,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7452.

178 L. Ed. 2d 216,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# TRANSCOM representative visits DLA

/ Published April 6, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The mobilization assistant to the commander of U.S. Transportation Command met with leaders from the Defense Logistics Agency, DLA Joint Reserve Force and DLA Energy during a visit April 4 at the agency’s headquarters, where she received an overview of the agency’s support.

Army Maj. Gen. Cheryn Fasano, who also heads the Joint Transportation Reserve Unit, met with DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic, DLA Logistics Operations Deputy Director Kristin French and DLA Joint Reserve Force Deputy Director Kristin Kremer among others.

The TRANSCOM JTRU augments TRANSCOM in providing air, land and sea transportation for the Defense Department.

French gave an overview of DLA, breaking down the agency’s lines of effort, critical capabilities, major subordinate commands, supply chains and whole-of-government partners.

“TRANSCOM is a special partner of ours,” French said.

Army Col. Peter Abercrombie, DLA’s TRANSCOM division chief, described how DLA manages a global supply chain while being cost effective and efficient.

“We have to strike that balance often times on how we want to ship things,” he said.

Current initiatives will bring DLA and TRANSCOM closer than ever before, he added.

Kremer outlined the major initiatives of the DLA Joint Reserve Force, as well as reserve force structure, training, readiness and challenges in mission support. Kremer said Fasano’s visit provided an opportunity for the DLA JRF to strengthen its partnership with the TRANSCOM JTRU. 

“While we are a combat support agency and they are a [combatant command], we both rely on the same support structure from the services to accomplish our mission,” Kremer said. “The two organizations may be organized differently; however, they have similar readiness and training requirements focused on mission support.”

The leaders also talked about challenges in recruiting, retention, funding and mobilization, which highlighted similar constraints and established the groundwork for future joint training and education opportunities between the two organizations, Kremer added.

Fasano also received a tour of DLA’s Agency Synchronization and Operations Center.
No. 10-5270.

#### In re Paul Emory, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 269,

178 L. Ed. 2d 256,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7841.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
2017-1036.

#### Guehl v. Carillon House Assn., Inc.

Montgomery App. No. 27438, 2017-Ohio-5491. Appellee’s motion for leave to file amended memorandum in response to jurisdiction denied as moot.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chris J. Pollak, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the date of the financial statements contained therein.

/s/ CHRIS J. POLLAK
------------------------------------
Chris J. Pollak
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2006

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Loudeye Corp. and will be retained by Loudeye Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOHN DEROSA and A MAPLES INSURANCE AGENCY
, Appellant s ,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 4887

[ October 14, 2015 ]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Financial Services;

Case No. 118486

- 11

- AG

.

John DeRosa, Pompano Beach, pro se.

James A. Bossart, Senior Attorney, Department of Financial Services, Tallahassee, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

John DeRosa and A Maples Insurance Agency (the “agency”) appeal from the Department of Financial Services’ (the “department”) final order revoking the agency’s license after an informal proceeding pursuant to section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes. The depar tment agrees that it should have conducted a formal hearing and confesses error. See Meller

v. Florida Real Estate Comm ’ n , 902 So. 2d 325, 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“if it becomes apparent during the course of an informal hearing under section 120.57(2) th at material facts are in dispute, a formal hearing should be convened”). Accordingly, we reverse the order on appeal and remand for a formal hearing pursuant to section 120.57(1), Florida

Statutes.

Reversed and remanded.

C IKLIN
, C.J., G ERBER and L EVINE
, JJ., concur.

* * *2

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. D-2546.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Samuel Regester Neel, III.

562 U.S. 815, 131 S. Ct. 406,

178 L. Ed. 2d 271,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7508.

October 4, 2010.

Samuel Regester Neel, III, of Tallahassee, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Draft Mercury Risk TSD 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 03/03/2011 04:46 PM 

 Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Lydia Wegman, Bryan Hubbell, Zachary Pekar 

Cortney -- 

Attached is the draft Mercury Risk TSD. 

Thanks. 

Mercury Risk TSD - DRAFT-3-3.doc 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450
• •

State of Oregon's

Revision Authorization Application for

the Universal Treatment Standards

Phase II Land Disposal Restrictions

(September 19, 1994, 59 FR 48043)

Department of Environmental Quality

Portland, Oregon

May 19, 1995
• •

5/19/95

ATIORNEY GENERAL'S STATEMENT FOR FINAL AUTHORIZATION

FOR CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL RCRA PROGRAM ON SEPTEMBER 19,1994,

TEMPORARILY EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 19, 1994 AND FINALIZED MAY 18, 1995

I hereby certify, pursuant to my authority as Assistant Attorney General and in accordance with

Section 3006(b) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended by the Hazardous

and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (42 USC 6901 et seq.), and 40 CFR 271 that in my opinion

the laws of the State of Oregon provide adequate authority to carry out the revised program set

forth in the revised "Attorney General Statement" submitted by the State of Oregon Department of

Environmental Quality (DEQ). The specific authorities provided are contained in statutes or

regulations lawfUlly adopted at the time this Statement is signed and which are in effect now, or

shall be as specified below. These authorities and this certification supplement and amend

previously certified authorities granted January 30,1986, FR 51, page 3779, effective January 31,

1986; March 30, 1990, FR 55, page 11909, effective May 29, 1990; and August 5, 1994, FR 59,

page 39967, effective October 4, 1994.

I. LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS

A. EQC requlations provide specific land disposal restriction phase II universal

treatment standards, treatment standards for organic toxicity characteristic wastes

and newly listed wastes, and testing and monitoring activities as indicated in the

Revision Checklist.

Citation: OAR 340-100-002(1), revised December 2, 1994, effective December 19, 1994;

revised final on May 18, 1995.

Comments: OAR 340-100-002(1) incorporates by reference as adopted by the EQC 40

CFR Part 268, 40 CFR 268.1(c)(3)(ii), 268.1(e)(4), 268.1(e)(5), 268.1(c)(3)(iii), 268.2(g),

268.2(i), 268.7(a), 268.7(b)(4)(ii), 268.7(b)(5)(iv), 268.9(a), 268.9(d)(1)(i), 268.9(d)(1)(ii),

268.9(d)(1)(iii), 268.9(d)(2)(i), 268.9(d)(2)(ii), 268.38, 268.40, 268.41, 268.42, 268.43,

268.45(b)(2), 268.46, 268.48, and Part 268 Appendices IV, V, and X, as amended

September 19, 1994 (59 FR 48043-48110). Authority to adopt these regulations is

provided under ORS 183.355, ORS 466.020 and ORS 466.086.

Federal Authority: RCRA §§3001 and 3004 (d)-(k) and (m); 40 CFR 268.1(c)(3)(ii),

268.1(e)(4), 268.1(e)(5), 268.1(c)(3)(iii), 268.2(g), 268.2(i), 268.7(a), 268.7(b)(4)(ii),

268.7(b)(5)(iv), 268.9(a), 268.9(d)(1)(i), 268.9(d)(1 )(ii), 268.9(d)(1)(iii), 268.9(d)(2)(i),

268.9(d)(2)(ii), 268.38, 268.40, 268.41, 268.42, 268.43, 268.45(b)(2), 268.46, 268.48, and

Part 268 Appendices IV, V, and X, as amended September 19, 1994 (59 FR 48043-48110),

effective December 19, 1994, revised final on May 18, 1995.
1.1 .

Seal of Office

• •

Signature

1/ Dat~

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGISTRANT'S
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS,  DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             332
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      826
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2643
<PP&E>                                           20458
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   19289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2212
<BONDS>                                           6752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                        4928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     19289
<SALES>                                           1468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1578
<CGS>                                             2565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2904
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3062
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8014)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (985)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7029)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   2298
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4731)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.51)




</TABLE>