alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2181

To authorize the appropriation of funds for construction projects under the

Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

in Political Union with the United States of America, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. JOHNSTON (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the appropriation of funds for construction

projects under the Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political

Union with the United States of America, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Act of March 24, 1976 (Public Law 94–241, 90

4 Stat. 263), as amended, is amended by—

5 (1) adding the following section at the end

6 thereof:
2

S 2181 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 6. There are authorized to be appropriated for

2 the Government of the Northern Mariana Islands for cap3 ital infrastructure $18,000,000 to become available on Oc4 tober 1, 1994, and $9,000,000 to become available on Oc5 tober 1, 1995, notwithstanding the first paragraph of sec6 tion A of part II and section B of part III of the Agree7 ment of the Special Representatives on Future Federal Fi8 nancial Assistance for the Northern Mariana Islands, exe9 cuted on December 17, 1992: Provided, That such

10 amounts shall become available only to the extent that

11 matching funds are provided, on a project-by-project basis,

12 by the Government of the Northern Mariana Islands in

13 the amounts of $9,000,000 for fiscal year 1995 and

14 $18,000,000 for fiscal year 1996. No funds are authorized

15 to be appropriated for the purposes of this Act for any

16 fiscal year thereafter. Such Federal assistance shall be

17 provided through annual grants according to the remain18 ing terms of such Agreement, except that the duration of

19 the Agreement shall be two years.’’; and

20 (2) repealing section 4(b) upon enactment of

21 appropriations to the Secretary of the Interior for

22 the Government of the Northern Mariana Islands.

Æ
#### Annie Smith, Appellant, vs. Frank Taylor, *Appellee.*

144 So. 875.

Division A.

Decision filed December 15, 1932.

*Reese <& Reese,*for Appellant;

*Forsyth Caro,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and *429inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
# C_2013274EN.01003001.xml

| 21.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/30

---

Action brought on 28 June 2013 — ZZ v Court of Justice

(Case F-64/13)

2013/C 274/48

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s staff report concerning the period from 1 January 2008 until 31 December 2008, and order that the defendant pay compensation for non-material damage.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the applicant’s staff report for the period 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the applicant’s staff report for the period 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008;

| — | annul the decision rejecting the complaint of 21 March 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision rejecting the complaint of 21 March 2013;

| — | order the defendant to pay EUR 58 000 for non-material damage |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay EUR 58 000 for non-material damage

| — | order the Court of Justice to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Court of Justice to pay the costs.

---
No. 10-182.

#### McHenry Larsen, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 896, 131 S. Ct. 346,

178 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6222.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.
No. 10-59.

#### In re Leo Henry Albertson, Jr., Petitioner.

562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 263,

178 L. Ed. 2d 261,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7670.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
# Construction and Equipment’s cultural improvement team hosts a sweet kick-off event

/ Published May 11, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Construction and Equipment supply chain’s cultural improvement team hosted its first in-person event since the pandemic May 10.

The team provided donuts for the event, where C&E members socialized and learned about the organization’s latest initiatives.

DLA Troop Support C&E supply chain Director U.S. Navy Capt. John Montinola said events like these help to strengthen the team and invigorate the supply chain’s culture.

“It’s refreshing to see all of your faces this morning and it shows you care about the team,” he said. “Nothing can get you through tough times –and get you to really grow and bond—as focusing on the team and the culture, and that starts with kick-off events like this. It’s a breaking bread event where you can shake hands and talk face to face. When you can have a deep conversation with your peers as well as with the people that are leading you, that experience is invaluable.”

Tom Grace, C&E deputy director, agreed that CIT events are important bonding experiences, especially as employees are adjusting to coming back to the office after extended telework due to the pandemic.

“As we settle into our new normal under the future of work, and we start to get into the battle rhythm of the hybrid approach that we’re under now. People are settling back in,” Grace said. “Reenergizing the CIT for us was an important step to help normalize this future of work. And that starts with events like this.”

Culture improvement teams focus on improving the climate and culture of the workforce by developing events and programs to enrich the workplace.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shomari Moore, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 863]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jeanette Rodriguez-Morick, J.), rendered February 22, 2016, unanimously affirmed.

Although we find that defendant did not make a valid waiver of the right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.
# DLA Distribution Expeditionary commander receives end of tour award

/ Published Oct. 6, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Army Lt. Col. Ed Strzalkowski was honored by Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Commander, Navy Rear Adm. Grafton D. Chase, Jr., at an award ceremony Sept. 26, at DLA Distribution Headquarters in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania. 

“We want to recognize you for all the great work you’ve done,” Chase said.                 Army Lt. Col. Ed Strzalkowski thanks his Defense Logistics Agency Distribution teammates after receiving the Defense Meritorious Service Medal Sept. 26, 2023. (Photo by Dawn Bonsell, DLA Distribution PAO)                            DLA Distribution Expeditionary commander receives end of tour award                            Army Lt. Col. Ed Strzalkowski thanks his Defense Logistics Agency Distribution teammates after receiving the Defense Meritorious Service Medal Sept. 26, 2023. (Photo by Dawn Bonsell, DLA Distribution PAO)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Distribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 230926-D-KL823-3853

Strzalkowski, also known as “Lt. Col. Ski” throughout DLA, led the DLA Distribution Expeditionary team from July 2018 – September 2023. He expertly commanded the agency’s expeditionary force capability initiatives into maturity, a testament to his innovation and dedication to quality. His leadership, strategic vision, bold initiative and creativity were particularly evident during a critical period of operations and security at DLA distribution. 

His leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic contributed significantly to the readiness of the warfighter. His dedication to DLA values and his support for the global distribution in line with the national defense strategy have been fundamental. These efforts have laid the groundwork for the successful operation of the unified combatant commands and fostered a strong partnership with the government. Strzalkowski helped establish the distribution pipeline for the President’s one billion free COVID-19 test kits and the effective deployments of the DDXX team to support U.S. Northern Command during Hurricanes Florence, Dorian, Ida and Ian.In recognition of his service, he was awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal. 

“Hopefully my team and I have done a good job. I’d especially like to thank J7 and J8 for literally keeping us out of water and supporting our missions with equipment,” Strzalkowski said.
2017-0370.

#### State v. Thornton.

Muskingum App. No. CT2016-0041, 2017-Ohio-637.
# Norfolk distribution center celebrates Navy’s 240th birthday

/ Published Oct. 19, 2015
NORFOLK, Virginia, 
On Oct. 13, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Norfolk, Va., celebrated the Navy’s 240th birthday.   Norfolk is DLA Distribution’s largest operation supporting Navy customers.  The distribution center has a diverse base that includes home ported and transient ships, from aircraft carriers to destroyers and submarines, as well as Navy industrial activities and shore establishments located on and around the world’s largest Navy base.

The command’s ceremony honored 240 years of Navy heritage, which started with only two armed ships, which searched for munitions ships supplying the British Army in America.  From there, the Navy grew to include not only ships, but also what some call the most secretive and powerful fighting component of the Navy; the submarine force, which DLA Distribution Norfolk supplies.

Norfolk supports Navy customers through several major operations, including the Norfolk Intermodal Hub, a dynamic cross-dock facility that receives, processes, consolidates, and containerizes export surface cargo and also provides onward movement for cargo and retrograde received in its surface import operation. In addition to its designation as an official water port, the Norfolk Intermodal Hub provides specialized pier side stevedoring support for loading and offloading ship's cargo. The Material Processing Center provides customized material sorting, receipt processing, and delivery services to over 150 afloat units in the Hampton Roads region, including the Norfolk based aircraft carriers and submarines.
No. 09-11323.

#### Jerome Lanelle Coleman, aka Jerome Laneln Coleman, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 874, 131 S. Ct. 178,

178 L. Ed. 2d 107,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6766.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
CAAP-11-0000121

#### Silva v. State

Affirmed
No. 10-5304.

#### Edd Cox, Jr., Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 914, 131 S. Ct. 273,

178 L. Ed. 2d 180,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7262,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
# Army celebrates 248th birthday

/ Published June 15, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
A classic Army campaign is back for the service’s 248th birthday.

“Our tagline this year is, ‘Be all you can be,’ and our focus is on the Army’s unlimited possibilities,” Army Brig. Gen. David Warshaw, director of the Operational Analysis Department for the Operations and Integration Directorate at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, said during a birthday ceremony June 14 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex.                  Army Brig. Gen. David Warshaw, director of the Operational Analysis Department for the Operations and Integration Directorate at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, gave the keynote address during a birthday ceremony June 14, 2023, at the McNamara Headquarters Complex at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. The event was held for employees of all tenant agencies at the complex.                            Army celebrates 248th birthday                            Army Brig. Gen. David Warshaw, director of the Operational Analysis Department for the Operations and Integration Directorate at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, gave the keynote address during a birthday ceremony June 14, 2023, at the McNamara Headquarters Complex at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. The event was held for employees of all tenant agencies at the complex.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Chris Lynch DLA PhotographerVIRIN: 230614-D-HE260-1004

“The Army has always challenged our soldiers to be all they can be by providing practical, hands-on training and support to cultivate skills and interests that put soldiers on a path for long term success, both in the Army and beyond,” he said.

Employees of all tenant agencies at the complex, including the Defense Logistics Agency, were invited to the birthday celebration.

The Army is one of the nation’s oldest institutions, Warshaw said. Founded on June 14, 1775, the Army is a year older than the Declaration of Independence and 13 years older than the U.S. Constitution, he added.

There are over 200 different jobs in the Army, including logistics, engineering, aviation and medicine. These opportunities allow soldiers to have the diverse skills they need to defend America, he said.

“At any given time around the world, U.S .Army soldiers are training, partnering, defending, assisting or providing aid in support of our nation, our allies, our partners, and most importantly, our democratic ideals,” Warshaw said.

He also thanked the spouses, children and other family members for their contributions and sacrifices as their soldiers trained and sometimes deployed to defend the nation.
Letter Agreement




	



THIS LETTER AGREEMENT (the
“Agreement”), is made this __ day of __________, 2004, among Hudson United
Bancorp, a New Jersey corporation, Hudson United Bank, a New Jersey state chartered bank
(collectively, the “Company”), that maintain principal offices at 1000 MacArthur
Boulevard, Mahwah, New Jersey, and ____________________ (the “Executive”). 



             1.       
          In consideration of a payment by the Company of $___________, receipt of which
          is hereby acknowledged by the Executive, all severance agreements previously
          entered into between the Company and the Executive, are hereby terminated. The
          Company and the Executive agree that such payment relieves the Company of all
          obligations under the arrangements with respect to severance and terminates all
          rights of the Executive with respect to severance under such severance
          arrangements. 



             2.       
          The only benefits payable by the Company to the Executive arising from the
          Company’s termination of employment of the Executive with the Company or
          its subsidiaries shall be those, if any, set forth in the new Company-wide
          severance plan, adopted by the Company on _______________, 2004. 



             3.       
          The terms of this Agreement shall be governed by, and interpreted and construed
          in accordance with, the laws of New Jersey. This Agreement supersedes all prior
          agreements and understandings with respect to the matters covered hereby. Any
          amendment of this Agreement may be made only in a writing executed by the
          Company and the Executive, and no amendment or termination of this Agreement
          shall be effective unless and until made in such a writing. This Agreement may
          be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
          original, and it shall not be necessary in making proof of this Agreement to
          produce or account for more than one such counterpart. 



        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Letter Agreement to be signed by its duly
authorized representatives pursuant to the authority of its Board of Directors’
Compensation Committee, and the Executive has personally executed this Letter Agreement,
as his own act, all as of the day and year first above written. 













	ATTEST:




  /s/
——————————————

Corporate Secretary    
             		HUDSON UNITED BANCORP AND 
HUDSON UNITED BANK



By:  
——————————————

        John H. Tatigian, Jr.,     
        Chairperson,
Compensation Committee






	WITNESS:



  /s/
——————————————

[name]    
              		EXECUTIVE



  /s/
——————————————

[name]
#### Iskalo 5000 Main LLC, Matter of, v Town of Amherst Indus. Dev. Agency

4th Dept: 147 AD3d 1414

denied
#### In the Matter of 135 West. 13 LLC, Respondent, v Judith Stollerman et al., Appellants.

[55 NYS3d 52]

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered on or about May 3, 2016, which reversed a judgment of the Civil Court, New York County (Sheldon J. Halprin, J.), entered on or about December 10, 2012, after a *599nonjury trial, dismissing the holdover petition, and awarded possession of the subject rent-stabilized apartment to petitioner landlord, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition denied, and the proceeding dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Respondents, who are in their 80s, have been joint lessees of a studio apartment and a one-bedroom apartment, Apartments 3 and 4, respectively, the only apartments on the second floor of the subject premises, for more than 40 years, under a succession of landlords. Petitioner, the current landlord, established prima facie that Apartment 4 was not respondents’ primary residence by presenting surveillance video and Con Edison’s records of electrical usage *(see*Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2524.4 [c]; *Glenbriar Co. v*Lipsman, 5 NY3d 388, 392 [2005]). However, respondents rebutted petitioner’s case and demonstrated that the two apartments were treated as a combined primary residence *(see Glenbriar Co. v Lipsman, 5*NY3d at 393; *Sharp v Melendez,*139 AD2d 262 [1st Dept 1988], *lv denied*73 NY2d 707 [1989]), and there is no evidence that respondents’ living arrangement was entered into as a means of avoiding rent stabilization laws *(see Riverside Syndicate, Inc. v. Munroe,*10 NY3d 18 [2008]).

The trial court’s findings were reached under a fair interpretation of the evidence, and are thus entitled to deference *(see 409-411 Sixth St., LLC v Mogi,*22 NY3d 875 [2013]; *542 E. 14th St. LLC v Lee,*66 AD3d 18, 22 [1st Dept 2009]). The court credited respondents’ testimony as to respondent Sandow’s decision to sleep in Apartment 3 temporarily, due to the situation created by the upstairs neighbor and a perceived threat posed by the scaffold and shed located outside the window(s) of that apartment *(see 542 E. 14th St.,*66 AD3d at 19; *Ascot Realty LLC v Richstone,*10 AD3d 513 [1st Dept 2004], *lv dismissed*4 NY3d 842 [2005]).

The evidence of limited electrical consumption in Apartment 4 does not compel a finding of nonprimary residence, given respondent Sandow’s explanation for it, which includes her inability to use the kitchen and shower there.

Concur — Friedman, J.R, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary                                              Incorporation or Organization
---------                                               -----------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>
I.H.F.P., Inc.                                                   Delaware
Luck's, Incorporated                                             Delaware
M. Polaner, Inc.                                                 Delaware
International Home Foods (Canada), Inc.                          Canada
3423425 Canada Ltd.                                              Canada
Heritage Brands Holdings, Inc.                                   Delaware
Heritage Brands, Inc.                                            Delaware
Campfire, Inc.                                                   Delaware
Bumble Bee Seafoods, Inc.                                        Delaware
Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Alimentos
  Frigorificos Manta C.A.                                        Ecuador
Commerce Distributing Company                                    Delaware
Santa Fe Springs Holding Company                                 Delaware
BBII Acquisition Corporation                                     Delaware
Pesquena Manteuse de Alun
  Mantatun, S.A.                                                 Ecuador
Mayaguez Water Treatment Co., Inc.                               Puerto Rico
DM US Holding Corp.                                              Delaware
HMTF Mexico Holdings, S.A. de C.V.                               Mexico
Productos Del Monte,S.A. de C.V.                                 Mexico
Frutas y Verduras Selectas, S. de R.L. de C.V.                   Mexico
Creative Products, Inc. of Rossville                             Delaware
Orleans Acquisition Corp.                                        Delaware
IHF/GM Holding Corp.                                             Delaware
IHF/GM Acquisition Corp.                                         Delaware
</TABLE>