alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.14

                                                        November 18, 2004

EarlyBirdCapital, Inc.
600 Third Avenue
33rd Floor
New York, New York 10016

            Re:   ARDENT ACQUISITION CORPORATION

Gentlemen:

            This  letter  will  confirm  the  agreement  of the  undersigned  to
purchase warrants  ("Warrants") of Ardent  Acquisition  Corporation  ("Company")
included  in the units  ("Units")  being sold in the  Company's  initial  public
offering  ("IPO") upon the terms and conditions  set forth herein.  Each Unit is
comprised  of one share of Common Stock and two  Warrants.  The shares of Common
Stock and  Warrants  will not be  separately  tradeable  until 90 days after the
effective  date of the  Company's  IPO  unless  EarlyBirdCapital,  Inc.  ("EBC")
informs the Company of its decision to allow earlier separate trading.

            The  undersigned  agrees that this letter  agreement  constitutes an
irrevocable order for EBC to purchase for the  undersigned's  account within the
forty-trading day period commencing on the date separate trading of the Warrants
commences  ("Separation  Date") up to _________ Warrants at market prices not to
exceed $0.70 per Warrant ("Maximum Warrant Purchase"). EBC (or such other broker
dealer(s)  as EBC may  assign  the order to)  agrees to fill such  order in such
amounts and at such times as it may determine,  in its sole  discretion,  during
the  forty-trading  day period  commencing on the  Separation  Date. EBC further
agrees that it will not charge the undersigned any fees and/or  commissions with
respect to such purchase obligation.

            The  undersigned  may  notify  EBC that  all or part of the  Maximum
Warrant  Purchase  will be made by an affiliate of the  undersigned  (or another
person or entity  introduced to EBC by the undersigned (a  "Designee"))  who (or
which) has an account at EBC and, in such event,  EBC will make such purchase on
behalf of said affiliate or Designee;  provided,  however,  that the undersigned
hereby  agrees to make  payment of the  purchase  price of such  purchase in the
event that the affiliate or Designee fails to make such payment.

            The undersigned agrees that neither he nor any affiliate or Designee
shall sell or transfer the Warrants  until after the  consummation  of a merger,
capital stock exchange,  asset acquisition or other similar business combination
with an operating  business  and  acknowledges  that,  at the option of EBC, the
certificates   for  such  Warrants  shall  contain  a  legend   indicating  such
restriction on transferability.

                                        Very truly yours,



                                        ----------------------------------------
#### In the Matter of AAC Auto Service et al., Respondents, v New York State Department of Motor Vehicles et al., Appellants.

[64 NYS3d 538]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered February 1, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, granting the petition to the extent of vacating the determination of respondent Department of Motor Vehicles, dated September 18, 2014, upholding the imposition of monetary penalties against petitioner Aristo Arteaga, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the determination reinstated, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 dismissed.

The imposition of a civil penalty upon both Arteaga, in his *540capacity as a certified motor vehicle inspector, and petitioner AAC Auto Service, in its distinct capacity as a licensed official inspection station, for violations arising from the same conduct does not constitute a prohibited double fine *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 303 [h]; *Matter of GR Auto & Truck Repair v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs.,*150 AD3d 730 [2d Dept 2017], citing *Matter of Khan Auto Serv., Inc. v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs.,*123 AD3d 1258 [3d Dept 2014]).

Concur—Richter, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Oing and Singh, JJ.
No. 10-5427.

#### James Edward Lee, Petitioner v. Patty Ishee, et al.

562 U.S. 921, 131 S. Ct. 295,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7314,

178 L. Ed. 2d 193,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 499.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Constar International Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Hoffman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Hoffman               
|Michael J. Hoffman                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer



March 12, 2004
No. 09-11209.

#### In re Anthony Ray Dailey, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 160,

178 L. Ed. 2d 260,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7688.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
No. 10-5605.

#### MasterMichael Ramsey, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 931, 131 S. Ct. 326,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7134.

178 L. Ed. 2d 212,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 968.
No. 10-5300.

#### Anthony Raul Barron, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 914, 131 S. Ct. 273,

178 L. Ed. 2d 180,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6842.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, denied.
Structure ‐ Sanitized
#### Masciello v Incorporated Vil. of Lloyd Harbor

2d Dept: 140 AD3d 834

denied
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33093-33094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-98-010]


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: June 24, 1998 at 9:30 a.m.


[[Page 33094]]


PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Agenda for future meeting: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-698 (Final) (Remand) (Magnesium from Ukraine)--
briefing and vote.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission:

    Issued: June 11, 1998.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16201 Filed 6-15-98; 10:27 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# Defense Logistics Agency celebrates Navy’s 247th birthday

/ Published Oct. 13, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency held a celebration in honor of the Navy’s 247th birthday with a ceremony at its headquarters in Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Oct. 11.

The ceremony paid homage to the Navy’s birthday theme, “On watch 24/7 for 247 years,” with a performance by the Navy Brass Quintet and the presentation of colors by the Navy Color Guard.

Navy Rear Adm. Doug Noble, director of DLA Logistics Operations and the event’s keynote speaker, gave a brief overview of the Navy’s history, originating Oct. 13, 1775, when the Continental Congress purchased two vessels to cruise against British merchant ships.

“Two months later, Congress directed the construction of 13 frigates and the Navy was underway,” Noble said.

The Navy traces its history, traditions and spirit back to the USS Constitution, the world’s oldest commissioned warship afloat. Old Ironsides remains a source of pride for all sailors, “providing a tangible connection to our earliest foundations,” he said.

One of those tangible connections is very close to DLA, he added. Navy Cmdr. Thomas Coyne, who was the 57th commanding officer of the USS Constitution from 1972 to 1974, was also the father of DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic.

“This connection reminds us of our history, and our heritage,” Noble said. “The USS Constitution stands as a reminder that the United States Navy is always ready to defend our shores, maintain sea control, and protect our national security and economic interests.”

Noble started his Navy career as a supply officer near the end of the Cold War.

“Back then, our Navy’s supremacy over the seas could not be taken for granted,” he said. “Time passed, and we enjoyed a generation where we were reliably in charge of the seas. Well, now we're back to the future in a new period of great power competition. One of the Navy's biggest challenges is to design a force that can meet and succeed in this new era of great uncertain certainty.”

The ceremony concluded with the traditional cutting of the birthday and a demonstration by the Navy Drill Team outside the McNamara Headquarters auditorium.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fredy Quizhpe, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 471]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered May 19, 2015, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and aggravated vehicular assault, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim *(see People v Devaney,*146 AD3d 803 [2017]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The contentions raised in the defendant’s pro se supplemen*800tal brief are without merit.

Balkin, J.P., Sgroi, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.
[Cite as State ex rel. McCuller v. Calabrese, 2013-Ohio-590.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA 

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION 

No. 98828 

STATE OF OHIO EX REL, 

CHARLES D. McCULLER 

RELATOR 

vs. 

JUDGE DEENA R. CALABRESE

RESPONDENT 

JUDGMENT: 

WRIT DENIED 

Writ of Procedendo 

Motion No. 458559 

Order No. 462221 

RELEASED DATE: February 15, 2013

-i-
FOR RELATOR

Charles D. McCuller, Pro Se 

Inmate #482-821 

Grafton Correctional Inst. 

2500 S. Avon Beldon Road 

Grafton, Ohio 44044 

FOR RESPONDENTS

Timothy J. McGinty 

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor 

By: James E. Moss 

Assistant county Prosecutor 

9th Floor, Justice Center 

1200 Ontario Street 

Cleveland, Ohio 44113 
PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.: 

{¶1} Charles D. McCuller, the relator, has filed a complaint for a writ of 

procedendo. McCuller seeks an order from this court which requires Judge Deena R. 

Calabrese, the respondent, to render rulings with regard to three “motion[s] to vacate void 

sentence” that are pending in State v. McCuller, Cuyahoga C.P. Case Nos. CR-79-48254, 

CR-79-48919, and CR-79-52011. McCuller’s request for a writ of procedendo is moot. 

{¶2} Attached to Judge Calabrese’s motion for summary judgment are three 

judgment entries, each journalized on September 11, 2012, that demonstrate rulings have 

been rendered with regard to each pending motion to vacate void sentence. Thus, Judge 

Calabrese has proceeded to judgment and McCuller’s request for a writ of procedendo is 

moot. State ex rel. Fontanella v. Kantos, 117 Ohio St.3d 514, 2008-Ohio-1431, 885 

N.E.2d 220; State ex rel. Howard v. Doneghy, 102 Ohio St.3d 355, 2004-Ohio-3207, 810 

N.E.2d 958, ¶ 6, quoting State ex rel. Kreps v. Christiansen (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 313, 

318, 725 N.E.2d 663. 

{¶3} Accordingly, we grant Judge Calabrese’s motion for summary judgment. 

McCuller to pay costs. Cost ordered waived. The court directs the clerk of court to serve 

all parties with notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by 

Civ.R. 58(B). 
{¶4} Writ denied. 

 

PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, PRESIDING JUDGE 

MELODY J. STEWART, A.J., and 

EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30784-30785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15196]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL WOMEN'S BUSINESS COUNCIL


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: National Women's Business Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Women's Business Ownership Act,

[[Page 30785]]

Public Law 105-135 as amended, the National Women's Business Council 
(NWBC) announces a forthcoming Council meeting and joint meeting of the 
NWBC and Interagency Committee on Women's Business Enterprise. These 
meetings will cover action items worked on by the National Women's 
Business Council and the Interagency Committee on Women's Business 
Enterprise including but not limited to increasing procurement 
opportunities, welfare-to-work and access to capital for women business 
owners.

DATE: June 15, 1998.

ADDRESS: Council Meeting & Joint Meeting, The White House, Old 
Executive Office Bldg., Vice President's Ceremonial Office--Room #276, 
Washington, DC 20502, 10:00 am-12:30 pm.

STATUS: Open to the public--limited space available.

CONTACT: National Women's Business Council, 409 Third Street, S.W., 
Suite 5850, Washington, DC 20024, (202) 205-3850.

    Note: Please RSVP by June 11th for security clearance reasons.
Gilda Presley,
Administrative Officer, National Women's Business Council.
[FR Doc. 98-15196 Filed 6-3-98; 3:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-AB-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2425 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2425

To amend the Illinois and Michigan Canal Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 
   to modify the boundaries of the corridor, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 25 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

   Mr. Simon introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Illinois and Michigan Canal Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 
   to modify the boundaries of the corridor, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 104(b)(1) of the Illinois and Michigan Canal National 
Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(1)(A) The corridor shall consist of the areas depicted on--
            ``(i) the map entitled `Illinois and Michigan Canal 
        National Heritage Corridor', dated May 1983 and numbered IMC-
        80,000;
            ``(ii) the map entitled `Illinois and Michigan Canal 
        National Heritage Corridor--Boundary Definition for portions of 
        the Corridor East of Harlem Avenue', dated October 31, 1989; 
        and
            ``(iii) the map entitled `Illinois and Michigan Canal 
        National Heritage Corridor--Boundary Definition for the Lake 
        Renwick Zone', dated October 31, 1989.
    ``(B) The maps described in subparagraph (A) shall be on file and 
available for public inspection in the offices of the Commission and in 
the offices of the National Park Service.''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF COMMISSION.

    Section 111(a) of the Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage 
Corridor Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking out 
``ten'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``20''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2I, William W. Phillips, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harrington West FinancialGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 34

 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: May 11, 2006                                                              /s/ WILLIAM W. PHILLIPS   William W. Phillips,   President, Chief Operating Officer and
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              747,207
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       188,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                         22,000
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,096,932
<PP&E>                                           13,018,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                   11,085,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3,071,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               773,744
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             25,039
<OTHER-SE>                                          156,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3,071,024
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,939,921
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,196,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   33,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (356,453)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (356,453)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (356,453)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (1.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.00




</TABLE>
No. 10-5666.

#### Lutgardo Silva, Petitioner v. Burl Cain, Warden.

562 U.S. 965, 131 S. Ct. 461,

178 L. Ed. 2d 293,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8053.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.11

                               ABERCROMBIE & FITCH

                                      AWARD
                                STOCK UNIT GRANT
                           ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT

This Stock Unit Agreement is entered into by and between Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(the "Company"), and the Associate of the Company whose name appears below (the
"Associate") in order to set forth the terms and conditions of grant of stock
units, each representing the right to receive one share of Class A Common Stock,
$0.01 par value, of the Company (the "Stock Units"), to the Associate under the
Abercrombie & Fitch 1996 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan (1998
Restatement, as amended) (The "Plan").

      ASSOCIATE'S NAME:

      SOCIAL SECURITY #:

      # OF STOCK UNITS:

      DATE OF GRANT:

      VESTING:             Stock Units vest on the anniversary of Date of Grant
                           in accordance with the schedule listed below:

                           Year 1   #    25%
                           Year 2        25%
                           Year 3        25%
                           Year 4        25%

Subject to the terms and conditions of the attached Plan, which are incorporated
herein by reference, the Company hereby grants to the Associate the Stock Units
                               as outlined above.

The Company and the Associate executed this Stock Unit Agreement as of the Date
of Grant set forth above.

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH                         ASSOCIATE

_____________________________________       ____________________________________
Michael Jeffries, Chairman and Chief
 Executive Officer
#### Com. v. Gerholt22

03/17/2016

435 WAL (2015)

22

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 84
No. 10-5496.

#### Robert Powell, Petitioner v. Jerome W. Walsh, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.

562 U.S. 925, 131 S. Ct. 309,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7408.

178 L. Ed. 2d 201,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.