Affirmed as Modified and Opinion Filed September 11, 2014 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01028-CR 

No. 05-13-01029-CR 

No. 05-13-01030-CR 

ANGELA KAY TAYLOR, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-30649-Q, F13-55642-Q, F12-40522-Q 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Evans 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Angela Kay Taylor appeals from three convictions for theft of property. In four issues, 

appellant contends the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court’s order for appellant to 

pay court costs and the judgments should be modified to reflect the name of the attorney who 

represented the State and that there were no plea bargain agreements in these cases. We modify 

the trial court’s judgments and affirm as modified. 
‐2‐ 

BACKGROUND

In cause no. 05-13-01028-CR, appellant waived a jury, pleaded guilty to theft of property 

valued at $1,500 or more but less than $20,000, and pleaded true to two enhancement 

paragraphs. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03(a), (e)(4) (West Supp. 2013). In cause no. 05-

13-01029-CR, appellant waived a jury, pleaded guilty to theft of property valued at less than 

$1,500, having two prior theft convictions, and pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs. 

See id. After finding appellant guilty and the enhancement paragraphs true, the trial court 

assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment in each case. The trial court’s judgments also 

include orders that appellant pay $219 in court costs. 

In cause no. 05-13-01030-CR, appellant waived a jury, pleaded guilty to theft of property 

valued at less than $1,500, having two prior theft convictions, and pleaded true to two 

enhancement paragraphs. See id. Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, the trial court deferred 

adjudicating guilt and placed appellant on five years’ community supervision. The State later 

moved to adjudicate guilt, alleging appellant violated several conditions of community 

supervision. Appellant pleaded true to the allegations in a hearing on the motion. The trial court 

found the allegations true, adjudicated appellant guilty, and assessed punishment at two years’ 

confinement in state jail. 

COURT COSTS

In her first two issues, appellant contends that in cause nos. 05-13–1028-CR and 05-13-

01029-CR, the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court’s orders for her to pay $219 in 

court costs. Appellant asserts the clerk’s records do not contain bills of costs and, thus, the 

evidence is insufficient. The record before us contains the bill of costs in each of these cases. 

Appellant’s complaints, including those contained in her objection to the supplemental clerk’s 

records, have been addressed and rejected. See Johnson v. State, 423 S.W.3d 385, 390 (Tex. 
‐3‐ 

Crim. App. 2014) (holding that “a bill of costs is a relevant item that if omitted from the record, 

can be prepared and added to the record via a supplemental clerk’s record”); Coronel v. State, 

416 S.W.3d 550, 555–56 (Tex. App.––Dallas, pet. ref’d). We overrule appellant’s first two 

issues. 

MODIFY JUDGMENTS

In her third and fourth issues, appellant contends the judgments should be modified to 

accurately reflect the name of the attorney representing the State in the proceedings and to show 

there were no plea bargain agreements. The State agrees the judgments should be modified as 

appellant has requested. 

The records show that during the joint plea/motion to adjudicate hearing, the State was 

represented by Andrew Anagnostis at the hearing. However, the judgments in cause nos. 05-13-

01028-CR and 05-13-01029-CR inaccurately recite the attorney for the State as Michelle 

Shugart. Further, appellant entered open guilty pleas to the charges in the indictments and a plea 

of true to the motion to adjudicate. The judgments inaccurately state terms of plea bargain 

agreements. We sustain appellant’s third and fourth issues. We modify the trial court’s 

judgments to show Andrew Anagnostis was the attorney for the State and that the terms of the 

plea bargain were open. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, 

pet. ref’d). 

CONCLUSION

 In cause no. 05-13-01028-CR and cause no. 05-13-01029-CR, we modify the trial 

court’s judgment to show the attorney for the State is Andrew Anagnostis, and the terms of the 
‐4‐ 

plea bargain are “open.” In cause no. 05-13-01030-CR, we modify the trial court’s judgment 

adjudicating guilt to show the terms of the plea bargain are “open.” 

As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgments. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

131028F.U05 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
‐5‐ 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ANGELA KAY TAYLOR, Appellant 

No. 05-13-01028-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the 204th Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F13-30649-Q). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, 

Justices Myers and Evans participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is MODIFIED as 

follow: 

The section entitled “Attorney for State” is modified to show “Andrew Anagnostis.” 

The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to show “Open.” 

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment. 

Judgment entered September 11, 2014 
‐6‐ 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ANGELA KAY TAYLOR, Appellant 

No. 05-13-01029-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the 204th Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F13-55642-Q). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, 

Justices Myers and Evans participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is MODIFIED as 

follow: 

The section entitled “Attorney for State” is modified to show “Andrew Anagnostis.” 

The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to show “Open.” 

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment. 

Judgment entered September 11, 2014 
‐7‐ 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ANGELA KAY TAYLOR, Appellant 

No. 05-13-01030-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the 204th Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F12-40522-Q). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, 

Justices Myers and Evans participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is MODIFIED as 

follow: 

The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to show “Open.” 

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment. 

Judgment entered September 11, 2014