alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Mizrahi, Respondent, v US Bank, National Association, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston CSFB 2005-2, Also Known as US Bank, National Association, as *619Trustee for Credit Suisse Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., CSFB Mortgage Pass-Thru Certificates, Series 2005-2, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[64 NYS3d 583]

In an action pursuant to RPAPL 1501 (4) to cancel and discharge a mortgage, the defendant US Bank, National Association, appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), dated June 13, 2016, which, inter alia, in effect, granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for summary judgment on the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, and the provision of the order which, in effect, granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and the first through fifth decretal paragraphs thereof are vacated.

In light of our determination on a related appeal granting that branch of the appellant’s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it *(see Mizrahi v US Bank, N.A.,*156 AD3d 617 [2017] [decided herewith]), the instant appeal has been rendered academic.

While it is the general policy of New York courts to simply dismiss an appeal which has been rendered academic, vacatur of an order or judgment on appeal may be an appropriate exercise of discretion where necessary “in order to prevent a judgment which is unreviewable for mootness from spawning any legal consequences or precedent” *(Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 718 [1980]; *see Matter of Adirondack Moose Riv. Comm. v Board of Black Riv. Regulating Dist.,*301 NY 219, 223 [1950]; *E-Z Eating 41 Corp. v H.E. Newport L.L.C.,*84 AD3d 401, 401-402 [2011]; *Funderburke v New York State Dept. of Civ. Serv.,*49 AD3d 809, 811 [2008]; *see also United States v Munsingwear, Inc.,*340 US 36, 40-41 [1950]). Under the particular circumstances of this case, we deem it appropriate to vacate the provisions of the order appealed from *(see Mannino v Wells Fargo Home Mtge., Inc.,*120 AD3d 638, 639 [2014]).

Dillon, J.R, Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ., concur.
# DLA Aviation honors five Hall of Fame 2023 members

/ Published Oct. 18, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Hall of Fame recognizes former employees who have made significant, enduring contributions to the aviation demand and supply chain.

Close to 300 family, friends, and current employees joined five previously inducted Hall of Fame members during a ceremony held Oct. 17 in the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia.

DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler hosted the ceremony, saying all inductees are proud examples for DLA Aviation, our community, and our nation.

“Our former teammates will now be immortalized, along with the 37 others, forever on the Hall of Fame wall in the front lobby of building 46 here on Defense Supply Center Richmond,” he said.

This year’s ceremony brings the total number of DLA Aviation’s Hall of Fame members to 42.

“I highly encourage not only our folks in Richmond, but at all our DLA Aviation locations to continue nominating individuals like this year’s recipients of this prestigious award. We have many people with phenomenal talents who do great things for our organization. I look forward to seeing you up here on this stage as new Hall of Fame inductees in the future.” Tyler said.

The five previously inducted Hall of Fame members honored during the ceremony were:
      - Alma Charles
      - Denise Canada
      - Kenneth Winslette
      - Michael Kennedy
      - Robert Wrenn

Tyler said, “We are honored to induct you into our Aviation Hall of Fame. Thank you for what you have done for this organization, the DLA community and for our warfighters. May God continue to bless you and your family.”

Each inductee received a medal to wear during the ceremony, as well as a commemorative plaque.

More information about the DLA Aviation Hall of Fame and its members can be found on the DLA Aviation Hall of Fame page.
#### Larry Wadell, Respondent, v Dolores A. Jessop, Appellant, Principal Construction Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[768 NYS2d 613]

— In an action to recover for property damage, the defendant Dolores A. Jessop appeals, as limited by her brief, from (1) stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered November 27, 2002, and (2) so much of an amended order of the same court dated February 6, 2003, as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered November 27, 2002, is dismissed, as the portion of the order appealed from was superseded by the amended order dated February 6, 2003; and it is further,

Ordered that the amended order dated February 6, 2003, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied summary judgment to the appellant. Smith, J.P., Townes, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
No. 10-6086.

#### Mayra Cristina De Leon-Zamora, aka Isabel Cervantes, aka Myrael Christina De Leon-Zamora, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 944, 131 S. Ct. 368,

178 L. Ed. 2d 238,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7362.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 401.
# C_2013344EN.01004702.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/47

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 13 September 2013 — Mohamed Ali Ben Alaya v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-491/13)

2013/C 344/82

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mohamed Ali Ben Alaya

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Council Directive 2004/114/EC (1) of 13 December 2004 on the conditions of admission of third-country nationals for the purposes of studies, pupil exchange, unremunerated training or voluntary service establish a non-discretionary right to a visa for the purposes of studies and the subsequent residence permit under Article 12 of the so called ‘Student Directive’, if the ‘conditions of admission’, namely those listed in Articles 6 and 7 of the directive, are met and there are no grounds for refusing the visa under Article 6(1)(d) of the directive?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 375, p. 12.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               jan-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    apr-30-1999
<CASH>                                  84,824
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           147,605
<ALLOWANCES>                            147,605
<INVENTORY>                             358,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        462,621
<PP&E>                                  519,106
<DEPRECIATION>                          198,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          783,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   4,470,913
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                42,476
<OTHER-SE>                              (3,919,960)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            783,429
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,085,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      24,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,110,543)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (1,110,543)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,110,543)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.28)



</TABLE>
# Brig. Gen. Shirley hosts last DLA Troop Support town hall 

/ Published June 9, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Shirley hosted a town hall event for Troop Support employees in Philadelphia on June 6.  

Shirley highlighted the importance of employee development, ensuring employees utilize their leave and the importance of treating each member of the team with dignity and respect. 

This event is slated to be the last town hall during Shirley’s tenure at Troop Support which began on June 22, 2021. 

“My goal is to make DLA Troop Support a preferred federal employment opportunity,” said Shirley. “This should be a place that people are aware of and strive to come to work for.” 

Shirley continued to stress that employees should take the time to spend with friends, family and personal reflection. Recently, Shirley took leave to visit his 18-year-old daughter to celebrate her graduation from high school.   

“All I thought about was: were there other opportunities where I could have spent more time helping her for the next step?” said Shirley. “Some of that could have been leave that I lost because I didn’t take it. I don’t want you all to have the same thoughts down the road.” 

Furthermore, Shirly stressed the importance of the programs undertaken by Troop Support’s Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Office. Throughout the year, the Troop Support EEO office works with the Naval Supply Systems Command’s Weapons Systems Support EEO office—co-located on Naval Support Activity Philadelphia—on a series of observances throughout the year. 

“If we take time to understand where people are coming from—and treat everyone with dignity and respect—we're going to be in a much better place in the organization,” said Shirley. 

At closing, Shirley shared some parting words for the Troop Support audience. 

“From the bottom of my heart thank you for the last two years because it's been absolutely a graduate-level education,” said Shirley. “I would just ask that you continue to do what you do because it is indispensable to the support of the joint force. Every soldier, sailor, airman, Marine, Coast Guardsman, and Guardian that's out there benefits from what you do on a daily basis.” 

The following 2023 DLA Troop Support awards were also presented at the event: 

**Strategic Goals Awards DLA Support Team Middle East:** Tanya Lawrence (C&T) 

**Employee of the Month:** Kimberly Sabo (C&T), February; Leah Alman (Subsistence), March; Joseph Zanolle (Subsistence), April 

**Innovation Award Winning Team:** Product Test Center – Analytical Team 

**Innovation Award Winning Individual:** Marko Graham (C&E) 

**As well as various FEB awards**
# C_2013252EN.01002001.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 4 June 2013 — LVP NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-306/13)

2013/C 252/30

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: LVP NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Council Regulation (EC) No 1964/2005 of 29 November 2005 on the tariff rates for bananas (OJ 2002 L 316, p. 1), as applied by the European Union in the period from 1 January 2006 to 15 December 2009, infringe Article I; Article XIII(1); Article XIII(2)(d); Article XXVIII; and/or any other applicable article of the GATT 1994, individually or collectively, by introducing a tariff rate of EUR 176/tonne for bananas (GN Code 0803 00 19), contrary to the concessions for bananas negotiated by the EC, before a new negotiated agreement in that regard was concluded within the framework of the WTO?

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30765-30766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Food Advisory Committee; Amendment of Notice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an 
amendment to the notice of meeting of the Food Advisory Committee. This 
meeting was announced in the Federal Register of May 12, 1998 (63 FR 
26194). The amendment is being made to reflect a change in the 
Procedure portion of the meeting notice. The organization and time of 
the oral presentations have been changed. All oral presentations will 
be made on June 16, 1998. There are no other changes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn A. Larsen, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-5), 202-205-4727, or Catherine M. DeRoever 
(HFS-22), 202-205-4251, FAX 202-205-4970, Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, or FDA Advisory Committee 
Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC 
area), code 10564.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of May 12, 1998 (63 
FR 26194), FDA announced that oral presentations from the public during 
the Food Advisory Committee meeting would be scheduled in three 
sessions over 2 days. However, all oral presentations have been 
combined into one session. On page 26195, in the first column, the 
Procedure portion of this meeting notice is amended to read as follows:
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by June 5, 1998. 
All oral presentations are scheduled in a

[[Page 30766]]

combined session on June 16, 1998, 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. * * *.
    Dated: June 1, 1998.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 98-15149 Filed 6-3-98; 11:35 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2436 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 2436

 To amend title 1 of the United States Code to clarify the effect and 
                      application of legislation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 14 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

 Mr. Thurmond introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 1 of the United States Code to clarify the effect and 
                      application of legislation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF THE EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LEGISLATION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1 of the United States Code is 
amended by adding at the end thereof the following:
``Sec. 7. Rules for the application and effect of legislation
    ``Any Act of Congress enacted after the effective date of this 
section--
            ``(1) shall be prospective in application only;
            ``(2) shall not create a private claim or cause of action; 
        and
            ``(3) shall not preempt any other law, either State or 
        Federal,
unless a provision of the Act clearly expresses a contrary intention 
and specifically refers to the paragraph of this section intended to be 
negated.''.
    (b) Chapter Analysis.--The chapter analysis for chapter 1 of title 
1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof the 
following:

``7. Rules for application and effect of legislation.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall take 
effect 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-10-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-30-1997
<CASH>                                         $88,970
<SECURITIES>                                   $0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  $5,410,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                   $300,000
<INVENTORY>                                    $16,221,465
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               $22,919,917
<PP&E>                                         $49,264,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                 $23,567,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 $52,705,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          $19,999,985
<BONDS>                                        $0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          $0
<PREFERRED>                                    $0
<COMMON>                                       $392,732
<OTHER-SE>                                     $14,277,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   $52,705,555
<SALES>                                        $9,225,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               $9,225,123
<CGS>                                          $5,731,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  $8,485,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               $0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $82,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                $170,616
<INCOME-TAX>                                   $30,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            $140,616
<DISCONTINUED>                                 $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                $0
<CHANGES>                                      $0
<NET-INCOME>                                   $140,616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01
        



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-248-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

June 16, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 10, 1998, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
July 11, 1998:

First Revised Sheet No. 16
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 24
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 104
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 108
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 200
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 242
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 274
Original Sheet No. 274-A
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 275
Second Revised Sheet No. 276
Third Revised Sheet No. 277
Second Revised Sheet No. 278
Original Sheet No. 278-A

    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to propose 
changes to the way in which it awards available capacity. Section 25 of 
the General Terms and Conditions of Northwest's tariff, ``Right of 
First Refusal; Posting of Available Capacity,'' currently pertains only 
to capacity that becomes available under expiring or terminating 
agreements. Proposed Section 25, which is now entitled ``Available 
capacity,'' has been revised and expanded to establish a new procedure 
for posting, bidding and awarding unsubscribed capacity instead of 
awarding such capacity on a first-come, first-served basis. Section 25 
also has been expanded to establish the procedures Northwest will use 
to reserve capacity for future expansion projects. Corresponding 
changes also have been made to related tariff sheets.
    Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
Northwest's customers and interested state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16487 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 

### Washington, DC 20004-2595■ 

### p202 624-2500■ 

### 1`202 628-5116 

# crowellrOmoring

Steven J. Seiden (202)624-2609 sseiden@crowell.com



# November 18, 2014

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

Mr. Paul Gretch Director Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation Room W86-316 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Polling Results for Application of United Airlines, Inc. for a Frequency Allocation (Docket DOT-OST-2014-0196)

Dear Mr. Gretch:

We have polled and received non-objections from each of the carriers on the attached service list for the above-referenced United l application. Prompt approval is requested so that United can secure foreign authority, make final operating plans and begin marketing these additional San Francisco-Shanghai flights well in advance of operations, which it plans to commence on or about May 6, 2015, provided all necessary approvals have been secured.

Respectfully submitted,

Steven J. Seiden

Counsel for United Airlines, Inc.

cc: Robert Finamore Brian Hedberg Brett Kruger All Parties on the attached Service List

Common names are used for airlines.

Crowell & Moring LLP■ www.crowell.com■ Washington, DC■ New York■ San Franci;co■ Los Angeles■ Orange County■ Anchorage■ London■ Brussels

# SERVICE LIST

msinick _ ssd.com robert. wirickg aa. com howard.kassgaa. com robert.cohn(khoganlovells.com patrick.rizzi(a),ho ganlovells. com pmurphy(k ggh-airlaw. com kevin.montgomerygpolaraircar o. g com rpommergatlasair. com sllunsfordg fedex. com nssparksgfedex.com gbleopardg fedex. com jhi,coole .c

~ 

# om_ perkmann(kcoole .
~ 

# sascha.vanderbellengdelta. com sametta. c. barnettg delta. com chris.walkerAdelta. com bob.kneisleygwnco.com leslie.abbottkwnco.com dkirsteinkyklaw. com jyoungAyklaw.com anita. mo snerg hklaw. com j ennifer.nowakkhklaw.com dwight.moore@transcom.mil j ohn. s. duncan(? faa. gov engletsgstate. o

~ 

# v

Crowell ft Moring LLP■ www.crowell.com■ Washington, DC■ New York■ San Francisco■ Los Angeles■ Orange County■ Anchorage■ London■ Brussels