alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013336EN.01001003.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/10

---

Action brought on 6 September 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-478/13)

2013/C 336/22

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and M. Owsiany-Hornung, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, in view of (a) its failure to impose, within the national legal system, an obligation to notify the competent Polish authorities of the locations at which GMO crops are being grown pursuant to Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, (1) (b) its failure to establish a register for recording the locations at which such GMO crops are being grown, and (c) its failure to provide information to the public on the locations at which such GMO crops are being grown, the Republic of Poland has failed to meet its obligations under Article 31(3)(b) of Directive 2001/18/EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, in view of (a) its failure to impose, within the national legal system, an obligation to notify the competent Polish authorities of the locations at which GMO crops are being grown pursuant to Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, (1) (b) its failure to establish a register for recording the locations at which such GMO crops are being grown, and (c) its failure to provide information to the public on the locations at which such GMO crops are being grown, the Republic of Poland has failed to meet its obligations under Article 31(3)(b) of Directive 2001/18/EC;

1

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which Directive 2001/18/EC had to be transposed expired on 17 October 2002.

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 106, p. 1.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Laureano, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 434]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph J. Dawson, J.), rendered May 16, 2014, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the first and second degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is unreviewable on direct appeal because it involves matters of trial strategy not fully explained by the record *(see People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 998 [1982]). Accordingly, since defendant has not made a CPL 440.10 motion, the merits of his claim may not be addressed on appeal.

As an alternative holding, to the extent the existing record permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). Defendant has not shown that any of counsel’s alleged deficiencies fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, or that they deprived defendant of a fair trial or affected the outcome of the case. We note that although counsel’s opening statement set forth a hypothesis of innocence, counsel never “promised” that this hypothesis would be developed by any particular means. Furthermore, he emphasized that his client was not required to testify or meet any burden of proof.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Tom, J.P., Kapnick, Webber and Oing, JJ.
November 30, 2015 

Dear Mr. Scholik: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3423). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, 

lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the 

maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual(s). 

 Your petition references the material listed below, however the material was not 

submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials: 

o Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM). 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/14/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Program Analyst
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16232]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.

    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel Coordinating Center for the African-
American Diabetes Mellitus Study Network.
    Date: July 8, 1998.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIEHS-East Campus, Building 4401, Conference Room 3446, 
Research Triangle park, NC 27709 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Carol K. Shreffler, PHD, Health Scientist 
Administrator, 104 T. W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709, (919) 541-1445.

    Name of Committee: Environmental Health Sciences Review 
Committee.
    Date: July 30-31, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIEHS-South Campus, Building 1, Conference Room ``B'', 
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    Contact Person: Ethel B. Jackson, DDS, Chief, Scientific Review 
Branch, Div of Extramural Res & Training, Natl Inst of Environmental 
Hlth Scis, National Institutes of Health, PHS, DHHS, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27709.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental Exposure; 93.142, NIEHS 
Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety Training; 93.143, NIEHS 
Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic Research and Education, 
93.894, Resources and Manpower Development in the Environmental 
Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-16232 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00657

- CV

EX PARTE Demond Depree BLUNSTON

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CVK

- 001377 D2

The Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION.

SIGNED July 24, 2013.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
# British Royal Navy strengthening strategic partnership with DLA

/ Published March 28, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
British Royal Navy RAdm. Andy Kyte, third from left, met with Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler and other senior DLA Aviation leaders during his visit to Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, March 23, 2023. The meeting focused on availability, supply chain resiliency, reducing the demand signal, and the F-35 Lightning II program. Kyte has also been meeting with key strategic leaders in the U.S. to help forge a stronger partnership. Kyte is slated to be the Royal navy’s next Chief of Defence Logistics and Support. (Photo courtesy of Navy Lt. Gregory Shumaker, Aide-de-Camp).
# Corpus Christi’s Odom announced as employee of the quarter 

/ Published March 21, 2016
CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas, 
Magalli Odom, supply technician at DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas, has been named DLA Distribution’s Employee of the Quarter for first quarter, fiscal year 2016, for her performance and significant support to the customer. 

According to supervisor Blessings Foster, Odom distinguished herself with her dedication to the inventory mission and her superior performance as the denial coordinator. 

“Ms. Odom is a self-starter, never deterred by the complexity or magnitude of the task at hand and can be relied upon to see that work is completed expeditiously and efficiently.  She has the ability to anticipate problem areas or external factors which impact inventory accuracy and plan ahead,” said Foster. 

Designated as Inventory Integrity denial coordinator, Odom was responsible for researching more than 600 potential denials, ultimately counting over 200 locations and verifying more than 21,500 assets.  She ensured that inventory locations and owner balances were accurate, which in turn ensured assets were ready for the customer without delay.  

Foster says that Odom’s attention to detail and superior work ethic resulted in DLA Distribution Corpus Christi maintaining a denial rating of .28 percent during first quarter FY2016.  During this period, she contributed to a cost avoidance of more than $75 million dollars in valid Material Release Orders, ensuring material was picked and ready for shipping with zero discrepancies. 

Odom also contributed to the overall Inventory Integrity mission by researching nine Inventory Adjustment Vouchers in which she single-handedly counted 135 locations with over 900 pieces, resulting in a cost savings of approximately $202,000.   

“When assigned any task, Ms. Odom displays tenacity and pride in her work. She is a consistent high performer in both quality and quantity when performing her duties, always seeking perfection,” said Foster.
# Returning customer reaches $5 million mark in reusable items

/ Published Oct. 16, 2020
CAMP LEJEUNE, N.C., 
Defense Logistics Agency employees at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, recently resumed issuing usable excess property to transfer and donation customers as pandemic restrictions eased, allowing one customer to reach the $5 million mark in property acquired through the agency.

Property Disposal Specialist Sharon Burke at the DLA Disposition Services site said the late September pickup by transfer and donation allowed items with a combined total of more than $320,000 in original acquisition value to find new users and new ways to serve taxpayers. Burke said numerous law enforcement agencies participating in the 1033 program were among those customers and “were glad to finally be able to pick up the property that they had requisitioned.”. 

Detective Ben Parrish from the Duplin County Sheriff’s Department was among the law enforcement agents receiving property that day. Burke said Parrish was excited about the property as it brought his department up to the $5 million mark in acquisitions.                 A forklift awaits service at the Duplin County Sheriff’s Department after being acquired as an excess military item at DLA Disposition Services at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.                            Servicing new item                            A forklift awaits service at the Duplin County Sheriff’s Department after being acquired as an excess military item at DLA Disposition Services at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Duplin County Sheriff’s DepartmentVIRIN: 201014-D-D0441-001

“It’s been a phenomenal program for us,” Parrish said. “We've gotten everything from first aid kits to defibrillators in all of our cars. It’s saved at least four lives.”

Parrish said the forklift acquired that day will be used to load Meal Ready to Eat field rations and water during emergencies. A shipping container his department also received has multiple doors that the department will use to store parts for ATV's and other vehicles.

Duplin County has employed much of the $5 million in equipment in past emergencies like Hurricane Florence. Parrish recalled a time during Florence when their modified MRAP was used to rescue victims from high water areas. By the time his deputies arrived to transport an expectant mother, he remembers she was already well on the way to delivery. His deputies trained recently on their inflatable boats to ready for when they were needed again.

The Avery County Sheriff’s Office also received its gear. Burke said they waited the longest between ordering and being able to pick up their items. She also said that federal customers were happy that day as they took home approximately $269,000 worth of items, about 84% of the property issued that day. Among those customers was the Louisiana Federal Property Program at $98,000, the Federal Surplus Property Program in Texas at $80,000 and its counterpart in South Carolina at $74,000.
#### Celeste Wenegieme, Appellant, v Delroy Harriott et al., Respondents.

[68 NYS3d 432]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, J.), entered October 6, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motion with respect to plaintiff’s claim of serious injury to her cervical and lumbar spine and the 90/180-day claim, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Assuming defendants made a prima facie showing that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury to her cervical spine or lumbar spine, plaintiff raised triable issues of fact as to those claims. In support of their motion, defendants submitted MRI reports showing multiple bulging discs and a herniated disc, as well as other medical records. Since the records were properly before the court and not disputed by defendants, plaintiff was entitled to rely upon them to show objective evidence of injury *(Bent v Jackson,*15 AD3d 46, 47-48 [1st Dept 2005]; *see also Mitchell v Calle,*90 AD3d 584, 585 [1st Dept 2011]). Plaintiff demonstrated the existence of significant limitations in spinal range of motion, both shortly after the accident and recently, through the affirmed report of her treating physiatrist *(see Castillo v Abreu,*132 AD3d 520, 521 [1st Dept 2015]), who also opined that plaintiff’s limitations were causally related to the accident *(see Yuen v Arka Memory Cab Corp.,*80 AD3d 481, 482 [1st Dept 2011]).

Plaintiff’s gap in treatment is not dispositive, as she explained that, after 11 months of therapy, her physician told *413her any further treatment would be palliative in nature. Moreover, her physician stated that her condition remained persistent throughout treatment *(see Roldan v Conti,*137 AD3d 507, 508 [1st Dept 2016]; *see also Ramkumar v Grand Style Transp. Enters. Inc.,*22 NY3d 905 [2013]).

Defendants made a prima facie showing that plaintiff’s shoulder injuries were not causally related to the accident, but involved preexisting congenital and degenerative conditions, as reflected in her radiologist’s MRI report *(see Barreras v Vargas,*151 AD3d 620, 620-621 [1st Dept 2017]). Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact. Her physician provided only a conclusory opinion that her right shoulder injuries were caused by the accident, without addressing the preexisting degenerative conditions documented in her own MRI, or explaining why her current reported symptoms were not related to the preexisting conditions *(see Lee v Lippman,*136 AD3d 411, 412 [1st Dept 2016]; *Alvarez v NYLL Mgt. Ltd.,*120 AD3d 1043, 1044 [1st Dept 2014], *affd*24 NY3d 1191 [2015]).

The 90/180-day claim is reinstated inasmuch as there was no motion to dismiss it.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Maz-zarelli, Andrias, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
# Germany-based excess property specialist honored for Q4 effort

/ Published Nov. 29, 2023
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Between May and October, the Defense Logistics Agency property disposal site in Grafenwoehr, Germany, was missing a property receipt specialist. While it may seem like one open position might not be that big of a deal, the loss of a full-time employee’s contributions can severely impair a small office’s ability to keep up with warfighter demand, particularly in a region where rotational forces run a brisk training tempo. 

Luckily for the site, it could lean on Material Examiner and Identifier Clint Sweeney, who was honored as DLA Disposition Services 4th Quarter Employee of the Quarter for his willingness to take on extra responsibilities and keep the agency’s property turn-in support services steady.

“Clint Sweeney has been a longtime value to DLA,” said Area Manager Mark Miskin, who oversees the Grafenwoehr site, along with others in Kaiserslautern, the United Kingdom, and in Djibouti. “He has a very strong work ethic and friendly attitude, towards customers and colleagues alike. I have been thoroughly amazed by his knowledge and the time and energy he has sacrificed for the agency.”

Miskin said that in addition to “carrying the weight” of the missing receiver position, Sweeney also flexed to cover down on the site’s material handling equipment program and its demilitarization operations when coworkers were on sick leave or traveling for agency temporary duty assignments. 

“Mr. Sweeney has proven himself an asset not just to the site but also to DLA Disposition Services and the warfighter,” Miskin said. “[His] knowledge of property and strong work ethic have shined through while he has taken on extra duties to keep the Grafenwoehr site operating, without falling behind.”

Sweeney said he grew up in small town Minnesota and enlisted in the Army after high school, filling several temporary federal civilian roles in the years after his military service.

“When I started in 2004 with DLA, I realized that I had finally found the perfect job for me,” Sweeney said of the term position he filled at what used to be known as DLA’s Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office, or DRMO, in Schweinfurt, Germany. He remained in Schweinfurt until it closed in 2014, when he transferred to Grafenwoehr. 

“On a day-to-day basis, I’m ensuring the government is receiving the biggest bang for its buck,” Sweeney said. “Every day is a new day. When you come into work you can try to plan what your day is going to be like, but most likely something different is going to happen just because the customers’ mission has changed or because world events have changed. You always have to remain flexible and aware of things that are happening around you.” 

Sweeney said his colleagues in Germany are great to work with, and he credited them with demonstrating a wide variety of talent and experience that helps the team quickly resolve challenges and determine the best warfighter support solutions.

“I enjoy the customers and appreciate the fact that I can assist them in accomplishing the mission,” Sweeney said. “I’m proud of what I do.”
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Noble, Chairman/Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David J. NobleDavid J. NobleChairman/DirectorAnd Principal Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2006Date
2017-0303.

#### State v. Buck.

Summit App. No. 27597, 2017-Ohio-273.
# ILOG students visit DLA Distribution Susquehanna

/ Published May 15, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Army Logistics University Intern Logistics Studies students visited Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Susquehanna, Pa., May 13 to learn about DLA’s global distribution network and tour the Department of Defense’s largest distribution facility.

Starting the day, DLA Distribution commander Brig. Gen. Richard Dix presented ALU course instructor Lee Holland with a coin for his years of support towards America’s logisticians.  The students then received a command overview highlighting DLA’s global distribution network of 24 distribution centers, as well as supply chain stock replenishment, customer demand patterns, and coordination of transportation for customer deliveries.

Following the overview, the group was guided through the Eastern Distribution Center, DoD’s largest distribution operation under one roof.  Attendees visited key areas including receiving operations for mission receipts and field returns, dedicated truck lanes serving continental U.S. and outside the continental U.S. customers with time-definite deliveries, and the Theater Consolidation and Shipping Point, where materiel is consolidated into loads destined to OCONUS customers through the use of seavan containers.
No. 10-5689.

#### Joe Luis Guerrero, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 965, 131 S. Ct. 462,

178 L. Ed. 2d 294,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7959.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, denied.
2016-1629.

#### Thomasson v. Thomasson.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104579.

O’Donnell and DeWine, JJ., dissent.