alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
fiaij^ Area Cbanj)cr(rf Conroerce 

1259 Liberty Street 

FrankJin, Pennsylvania 16323 

814/432-5823 

FAX 814/437-2453 

http://www.franklin-pa.org 

7/28/2010 E-mail: chamber@franklin-pa.org 

Mr. Dennis J. De Vany 

Chiefi Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation 

Dear Mr. De Vany: 

I am writing you in support of the Gulfstream Int'i Airlines proposal. Option One (1), to 

provide scheduled air service to Franklin/Oil City (FKL) under the Essential Air Service 

program. Franklin/Oil City (FKL) lost air service along with other EAS conununities in 

May of 2008 when the contracted air carrier ceased operations. Service was reinitiated on 

September 3,2008 v^th Gulfstream Int'l Airlines operating as Continental Connection 

through the Continental Airlines hub in Cleveland, OH. 

The effort to regain the travel maiicet lost due to the three months without air service is 

on going and substantial. Additionally; the nation experienced the worst recession m the 

past fifty (50) years almost as soon as Gulfstream began FKL service. 

The economic ''recovery" has been sporadic nationwide and negligible, thus &r, in the 

Franklin/Oil City area. This region, which had been particularly devastated even prior to 

2008 due to plant closings and layoff, has been working to reinvent its economy. The 

2008 recession was a fiirther setback. 

The Franklin Area Chamber of Commerce supports Gulfstream's option # 1 service 

through Cleveland and will work closely with the Airport and Gulfstream through the 

Save our Service (SOS) effort to improve passenger enplanements to again be under the 

$200 per passenger cap. The service offered using Cleveland as a hub gives this 

community more non stop destinations and reasonable connections and fares. 

The citizens of Franklin and Oil City as well as the entire Oil Heritage Region want the 

timely, dependable air service proposed by Gulfstream and request that the Department 

of Transportation provide this chance to continue the rebuilding of this economy. 

Gulfstream's option 1 can serve as a huge stimulus to this region. 

The region is experiencing the beginnings of a positive trend in business development 

thanks to the hard work of our legislators and community leaders. Meaningful, scheduled 

air service is a key element in the success of this venture. This rural area should be 

Our mission is to provide leadership for the business community l}y providing economic, educational, and legislative information and 

assistance which can be used by members to achieve profit, progress and prosperity. 
allowed to compete with the larger urban areas on a level playing field. Viable 

commercial air service helps level that playing field and is necessary for business 

development and sustained economic growth. 

We ask that you recommend this proposal to the Deputy Secretary. 

Thank you for your work on the Essential Air Service program on behalf of the 

communities of Franklin/Oil City and the Oil Region. 

Best Regards, 

I Cochran 

Executive Director 

Franklin Area Chamber of Commerce
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,154
<INVENTORY>                                     22,872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,807
<PP&E>                                          38,168
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,950
<BONDS>                                        233,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           38,836
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                   (182,351)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,844
<SALES>                                         59,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,672
<CGS>                                           41,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,042)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (673)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,369)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,369)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.14




CONSENT




We hereby consent to the reference to our “valuation of Series B Debentures and Series A Debentures of Plaza Centers N.V.” as of December 31, 2008, in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2009 and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd. and in the Shelf Prospectus filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd. with the Israeli Securities Authority and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange on July 21, 2009.




This consent is not to be construed as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to be filed with the Annual Report under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.




/s/Giza Zinger Even

Giza Zinger Even




Tel Aviv, Israel


May 9, 2010
#### Jessica Peña, Respondent, v Tyrax Realty Management, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[54 NYS3d 4]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered on or about May 31, 2016, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants failed to make a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment, since the evidence they submitted raises genuine issues of fact about whether they created a dangerous condition *(see DiVetri v ABM Janitorial Serv., Inc.,*119 AD3d 486, 487 [1st Dept 2014]). The superintendent of the building owned by defendant 2305 Grandco and managed by defendant Tyrax testified that he had mopped the accident location with soap and water approximately five minutes before plaintiff slipped and fell and did not place warning signs in the area. Moreover, plaintiff’s testimony provides a non-speculative basis for her version of the accident and sufficiently establishes a nexus between the hazardous condition and the circumstances of her fall *(Yuk Ping Cheng Chan v Young T. Lee & Son Realty Corp.,*110 AD3d 637, 637-638 [1st Dept 2013]).

Even if defendants had made a prima facie showing, it was rebutted by, among other things, the transcript of a recorded conversation between plaintiff and a Tyrax manager, in which the manager conceded that the area had been mopped and that no warning signs were placed thereafter. Even if a portion of the transcript is hearsay, under the particular circumstances it *441may be considered in conjunction with the other evidence to defeat summary judgment *(see Marquez v 171 Tenants Corp.,*106 AD3d 422, 423 [1st Dept 2013]).

Concur—Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.
No. 10-5801.

#### Andrew P. Kalick, Petitioner v. Northwest Airlines Corp., et al.

562 U.S. 938, 131 S. Ct. 348,

178 L. Ed. 2d 225,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7181.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 317.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16446]



[[Page 33989]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition: 
Determinations

    Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 FR 
13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 
(50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibit ``Sacred Visions: Early Painting from Tibet'' 
(see list \1\), imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition 
without profit within the United States, are of cultural significance. 
These objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
lenders. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the listed 
exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, 
from on or about October 5, 1998, to on or about January 17, 1999, is 
in the national interest. Public Notice of these determinations is 
ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

    \1\ A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Ms. Neila 
Sheahan, Assistant General Counsel, at 202/619-5030, and the address 
is Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 Fourth Street, SW, 
Washington, DC 20547-0001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: June 16, 1998.

Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-16446 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
# Advanced manufacturing collaboration takes center stage on DSCR

/ Published Jan. 20, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
Leaders from  various military aviation components, as well as representatives from Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, DLA Troop Support and DLA Headquarters, met Jan. 13 to exchange ideas, initiatives and developments in manufacturing focused on additive manufacturing for hard-to-source and obsolete parts.

Safety guidelines and limitations on DSCR due to the pandemic, limited in person attendance  the advanced manufacturing collaboration meeting in Conference Room 108 of the DLA Aviation Operations Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia.

Many attendees, including Army Maj. Gen. K. Todd Royar, commanding general of the Army Aviation and Missile Command in Huntsville, Alabama, attended virtually. Overall, a little more than 30 people participated.

Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, is a process used to create a physical object by layering materials one by one based on a digital model. Unlike subtractive manufacturing that creates its final product by cutting away from a block of material, additive manufacturing adds parts to form its final product.

DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. David Sanford kicked off the meeting, stressing that additive manufacturing capabilities and capacity are rapidly expanding across the defense industrial base complex.

“As more parts become available through additive manufacturing, DLA Aviation is in a unique position to pull together our joint partners and develop an approach on how these parts should be catalogued and made available to the joint forces,  he said.

Sanford went on to say that the Office of the Secretary of Defense is also leading many efforts and each service is looking into the cataloguing piece, but the opportunity is there to leverage each other’s work to advance the ball, which will improve readiness capabilities for the joint forces.

Army Col. Darren Buss, chief of the Army Customer Facing Division within DLA Aviation’s Customer Operations Directorate, said the services are continuing to pursue advanced manufacturing initiatives to overcome any readiness concerns and hard-to-make items.

“What we hope to accomplish is to try and determine where the gaps are in the policies, procedures and processes to pursue advanced manufacturing, mainly flight critical safety items,” he said.

Buss said those items are such parts as bolts, nuts and washers that holds an aircraft engine in place.

Sanford said this was the first in a couple of planned meetings and that there is still some work to be done to develop recommendations for the services to provide to OSD.
#### People v Carpenter

2d Dept: 138 AD3d 1130 (Queens)

denied 8/15/16 (Fahey, J.)
November 30, 2015

Dear Mr. Scholik:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is missing from your petition (Docket

No. FAA

− 2015

− 3423). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s) , and type(s)(i.e., - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operati on. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including pa yload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

 Your petition references the material lis ted below, however the material was not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Motion Picture and Television Op erations Manual (MPTOM).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information has b een submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary in formation), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exe mptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by 12/14/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,
/S/ Program Analyst
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark J. Edmonds, Appellant.

[630 NYS2d 933]

—Appeal by the *670defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), rendered September 21, 1993, convicting him of criminal trespass in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress fingerprint evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the court properly concluded that certain fingerprint evidence was admissible under the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule *(see, e.g., People v Stith,*69 NY2d 313; *People v Fitzpatrick,*32 NY2d 499, 508-509, *cert denied*414 US 1033, 1050; *People v Watson,*188 AD2d 501, 502). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.
Hello, my name is Jeff Green and I live in Frankfort Illinois just south of Chicago. I have a BS in Electrical Engineering Technology from Southern Illinois University, have been a renewable energy advocate for 25 years, I am a founding member of IREA which is Illinois Renewable Energy Association. We will be putting on our 141h annual renewable energy fair this August 22 nd and 23rd in Oregon Illinois. I have been passionate in my s tudy of global warming for 9 years now and have come to the conclusion that we are in for a world of hurt if we stay business as usual. Bold engineering in efficiency of trucking is a vital part of humanity staying sustainable on earth. In this discussion I want to go to 3 different sources that I respect in their practicality and their deep commitment to sustainability on earth . Union of concerned scientists, Sierra Club, and Amory Lovin ' s book "Reinventing F i re". I am a paying member of the f i rst two groups and have enjoyed Reinventing Fire for its very thorough review of how to achieve a great economy on much less energy. These groups are well studied and well informed on what is possible to keep our country great in its leadership in a cleaner energy economy .



### "' 0 v 3 

### Heavy-t ruck fue l efficiency: savi ngs vs. marginal cost t -
ltafl\tnt\\.tOO ••u•oh,try I)()Wt'f UIUI\

I I I 7 Mbblid

**"w.nq~** 0
**~------------------------------------------------~---------** 0.5 1 .5 2 dtesel fuel saved 

### 1n 2050 (Mbbl/dl 

### Fig. 2 - 17 . 

### Bcttct · design ofs i ngle-trailer Class 8 tt·ucks could save the U .S. F

rom the book Reinventing Fire by Amory Lovins . From the study in Reinventing Fire figure 2 . 17 shows 6 different areas of redesign of our class 8 trucks of how w e could achieve 

### 1.7Mbbl of diesel fuel/day savings 2050. $2 .47/gallon by year 2050 which t ranslates to $67 billion dollars peryear. Fuel prices in whatever form we have at that time will surely be higher than today .From my experience in being a sustainability and renewable energy advocate is that energy efficiency is t he low hanging fruit with the least cost and the greatest financial benefits. The trucking industry is no except ion to this rule . From both sou rces of Sierra Club and Union of Con ce rned Scientists show that the combined trucking standards of 2010 and 2015 could achieve a 40% redu ction of fuel savings of new trucks by 2025. New truck higher cost of$32,000 would save $30,000 in a year. That is a win in any business person's book. We should be bold in our move forward to be leader s in the world of engineering, product development, energy efficiency, and therefore bu sin ess costs. This kind of move will benefit our climate, health of our children and life on earth. Th is is the kind of win that eve ryon e will gain from. Thank you for your time .
2017-0631.

#### Kettering City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Testa.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2016-495. On appellant’s application for dismissal. Application granted. Cause dismissed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LUKE PETRUSCHKE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-902

[February 13, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-19779 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine 

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Week #3 of April PrepareAthon focuses on evacuation and SIP

/ Published April 18, 2023

In week two of Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Susquehanna’s April’s PrepareAthon we discussed how to sign up to receive emergency alerts before a disaster takes place, so that we may take immediate life-saving actions if a disaster takes place. This week we’ll focus on a couple of those emergency actions: evacuation and SIP, or shelter-in-place.

Imagine you receive this AtHoc message on your phone and computer: “A hazardous material release has occurred at your location. Shelter-in-place immediately. Shut down the building’s heating, ventilation and air conditioning units and close and stay away from windows. Wait for further instructions.”

Do you know the SIP locations for your facility? Is it an interior room with no windows? If you are unsure, refer to your local emergency action plan or ask your supervisor. If you are working outside and receive a message, take the following actions: move upwind, and if possible, take shelter in the nearest building.                 Most installation buildings are equipped with a “red button” under a clear plastic cover located in the common area or near entrance to building administrative areas. These buttons can be pressed to stop outside air from coming in, thus preventing, or greatly reducing any outside contaminants from traveling throughout the building.                            April PrepareAthon week 3 focuses on evacuation and SIP                            Most installation buildings are equipped with a “red button” under a clear plastic cover located in the common area or near entrance to building administrative areas. These buttons can be pressed to stop outside air from coming in, thus preventing, or greatly reducing any outside contaminants from traveling throughout the building.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Installation Management Security & Emergency ServicesVIRIN: 230418-D-D0441-3465

Do you know how to shut down your building’s HVAC? Most installation buildings are equipped with a “red button” under a clear plastic cover located in the common area or near entrance to building administrative areas. These buttons can be pressed to stop outside air from coming in, thus preventing, or greatly reducing any outside contaminants from traveling throughout the building. Take a minute to learn where your HVAC emergency shut off buttons are. 

If you receive a message directing you to evacuate your building or the installation given by the mass warning notification system, DLA police or fire department, do not panic and follow the instructions provided.  

If you witness or encounter a hazardous material spill do not attempt to clean it up. Call your local Emergency Communication Center’s non-emergency number.

Additionally, see the guidance resource below from the Federal Emergency Management Agency for more information on chemical SIP safety measures.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**Subsidiaries of CoBiz Financial Inc.**

 

The following is a list of all of the subsidiaries of CoBiz Financial Inc. and the names, other than their proper corporate names, under which they do business:

 

CoBiz Bank, a Colorado state-chartered bank owned 100% by CoBiz Financial Inc., doing business as Colorado Business Bank and Arizona Business Bank.

 

Western Real Estate Investors, Inc., a Colorado Corporation owned 100% by CoBiz Bank.

 

Financial Designs, Ltd., a Colorado corporation owned 100% by CoBiz Financial Inc.

 

CoBiz Insurance, Inc., a Colorado corporation owned 100% by CoBiz Financial Inc.

 

CoBiz GMB, Inc., a Colorado corporation owned 100% by CoBiz Financial Inc. and the sole general partner of Green Manning & Bunch, Ltd., a Colorado limited partnership.

 

CoBiz ACMG, Inc., a Colorado corporation owned 100% by CoBiz Financial Inc. and the sole member of Alexander Capital Management Group, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company.

 

Wagner Investment Management, Inc., a Colorado corporation owned 100% by CoBiz Financial, Inc.

 

RMA Holdings, Inc., a Colorado corporation owned 100% by CoBiz Financial, Inc.

 

----