alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0                   4,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                   4,800
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                   4,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,500                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         6,156                     250
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,154)                   4,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                   4,800
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,300                       2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,300)                     (2)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,300)                     (2)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,300)                     (2)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)                  (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)                  (0.00)


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69185-69186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27555]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Third Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 231, Special Committee 231 
TAWS--GPWS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 231, TAWS-GPWS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
third meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 231, TAWS-GPWS.

DATES: The meetings will be held January 6-8 2015 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at RTCA Headquarters, RTCA, Inc., 
1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, Washington DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 231. The agenda will 
include the following:

January 6th--9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

 Welcome/Introduction
 Administrative Remarks
 Agenda Review
 NTSB Recommendations--FAA presentation
 Summary of Working Group activities
 Other Business
 Date and Place of Next Meeting

January 7th--9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

 Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session

[[Page 69186]]

January 8th--9:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m.

 Continuation of Plenary or Working Group Session
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 13, 2014.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-27555 Filed 11-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
No. 10-5369.

#### Gustavo Araujo-Rios, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 918, 131 S. Ct. 285,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7072.

178 L. Ed. 2d 187,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 779.
Exhibit No. 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark S. Newman, Chief Executive Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|/s/MARK S. NEWMANMark S. Newman
Chief Executive Officer
June 11, 2004 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DRS
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-5169.

#### Ivory Lee Coleman, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 907, 131 S. Ct. 253,

178 L. Ed. 2d 168,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6975.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 982 A.2d 1148.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                      71,636,000
<SECURITIES>                                55,670,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,063,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (4,520,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,918,000
<PP&E>                                     110,987,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (16,319,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             343,850,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       57,519,000
<BONDS>                                    175,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       398,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  95,809,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               343,850,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,959,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,846,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            24,755,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,809,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (39,666,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (205,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (39,871,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (39,871,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16716]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP95-175-008]


Mojave Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 18, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 15, 1998, Mojave Pipeline Company (Mojave) 
tendered for filing a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission's 
Order on Compliance. Filing and Rehearing issued June 3, 1998 in this 
proceeding.
    Mojave states that the filing contains revised schedules that have 
been adjusted in accordance with the Commission's June 3 Order.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16716 Filed 6-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 09-10893.

#### Sheila Dennis, Petitioner v. City of Aventura, Florida, et al.

562 U.S. 855, 131 S. Ct. 118,

178 L. Ed. 2d 72,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6318,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roy Roberts, the ChiefExecutive Officer of Ckrush, Inc.. (the‘‘Company’’), certify, pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that tothe best of my knowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June30,  2006 (the ‘‘Report’’)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. |

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toCkrush, Inc. and will be retained by Ckrush, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

|        |  |  |                                                               |
|--------|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | /s/Roy Roberts                                                |
|   |  |  | Roy RobertsChief ExecutiveOfficer(Principal ExecutiveOfficer) |
|   |  |  | August 11,2006                                                |
|        |

----
#### In the Matter of Fay Pagnani, Petitioner, v Suffolk County Department of Social Services et al., Respondents.

[55 NYS3d 912]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York dated May 18, 2015, which, after a fair hearing pursuant to Social Services Law § 22, upheld a determination of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services dated September 12, 2014, that the petitioner was ineligible for Medicaid benefits due to her failure to submit proper documentation.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

In reviewing a Medicaid eligibility determination made after a fair hearing, the court must review the record, as a whole, to determine if the agency’s decisions are supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Bosco v McGuire,*111 AD3d 931, 932 [2013]). “Substantial evidence means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact. The petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating eligibility” *(Matter of Loiacono v Demarzo,*72 AD3d 969, 969-970 [2010] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]).

Here, the determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York that the petitioner did not establish good cause for her failure to provide in a timely manner documents necessary for the processing of her application for Medicaid benefits is supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Bosco v McGuire,*111 AD3d at 932; *Matter of Frohlinger v DeBuono,*278 AD2d 323, 324 [2000]).

Dillon, J.P., Hinds-Radix, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jahquar Christian, Appellant.

[65 NYS3d 707]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered November 10, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
No. 10-183.

#### Fred Samson, Petitioner v. James Manley, et al.

562 U.S. 962, 131 S. Ct. 468,

178 L. Ed. 2d 289,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7994,

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, denied.
No. 09-10594.

#### Freddie A. Land, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 956, 131 S. Ct. 395,

178 L. Ed. 2d 261,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7497.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Former decision, 561 U.S. 1032, 130 S. Ct. 3518, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1102, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5328.
No. 10-6285.

#### Sap Kray, Petitioner v. Patrick Glebe, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center, et al.

562 U.S. 987, 131 S. Ct. 427,

178 L. Ed. 2d 332,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8279.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*333Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 762.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-51-000]


Viking Gas Transmission Company; Notice of GRI Refund

June 12, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 9, 1998, Viking Gas Transmission Company 
(Viking) tendered for filing a report of Gas Research Institute (GRI) 
refunds to Viking for the period from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 
1997.
    Viking states that the refunds have been based on a total refund 
from GRI to Viking of $181,337.00, and have been allocated to Viking's 
firm shippers based on their relative contributions to GRI funding 
during 1997. Viking also states that the reported refunds will be 
credited to Viking's customers on May 1998 invoices that will be mailed 
in June.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Section 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before June 19, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16186 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
2017-0235.

#### Armstrong v. Wainwright.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
#### T.T. v. Department of Public Welfare 114

02/01/2016

312 WAL (2015)

114

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 48 A.3d 562
# Land and Maritime honors first Americans

/ Published Nov. 30, 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio,
# Joseph Henshaw, DLA Distribution Tobyhanna, is awarded Inventory Management Senior Civilian of the Year

/ Published Aug. 14, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Demonstrating leadership and accountability,Joseph Henshaw, supervisor of the inventory team at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Tobyhanna, Pennsylvania, is awarded the DLA Distribution Inventory Management Senior Civilian of the Year.

Under the leadership of Henshaw, DDTP completed their inventory, in some cases ahead of schedule, with 99% accuracy. Henshaw always maintained a “warfighter first” attitude as he maintained a constant level of inventory audit readiness and simultaneously implemented changes to enhance productivity and effectiveness for DLA customers.

Henshaw implemented a customer relations program with his team to build strong partnerships with joint agencies. Under his tutelage, his team met and built a strong rapport with Tobyhanna Army Depot, Logistics Support Activity, Communication-Electronics Command, as well as DLA sister agencies. His direct efforts enabled his team to bridge the gap in communications and foster better and stronger relationships.

Henshaw traveled to meet with U.S. Army and Marine Corps customers throughout the Eastern Seaboard to rectify issues with receipts and supply discrepancy reports, which had a great impact on DLA and customer relationships.

Henshaw serves as a mentor to his team reminding them of the importance of DLA, the impact of DLA services and always “Warfighter first.” Undeniably, his positive attitude and great customer service skills will continue to contribute to the overall success of DDTP.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Covansys Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael S. Duffey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Michael S. Duffey Michael S. Duffey
Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2004
No. 10-6265.

#### Juan Angel Osorio-Funez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 973, 131 S. Ct. 488,

178 L. Ed. 2d 309,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7904.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 573.
#### Terell Ballo, Appellant, v AIMCO 2252-2258 ACP, LLC, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[63 NYS3d 865]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J), entered May 31, 2016, which granted the motion of defendant AIMCO 2252-2258 ACP, LLC (AIMCO) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the complaint as against AIMCO was proper in this action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when, while standing on the sidewalk outside a bar owned and operated by codefendant P.J. Cocktail Lounge & Restaurant, Inc. (PJ’s), he was shot in the foot. The record demonstrates that AIMCO owned the commercial space and had leased it to PJ’s, and as a premises owner, AIMCO cannot be held liable in negligence for an assault that occurred on a public street over which it exercised no control *(see Ramsammy v City of New York,*216 AD2d 234, 236 [1st Dept 1995], *lv dismissed in part*
      *583
      *and denied in part*87 NY2d 894 [1995]; see *also White v Celebrity Lounge,*215 AD2d 650 [2d Dept 1995]).

AIMCO also owed plaintiff no duty of care to prevent the incident since the evidence showed that AIMCO was an out-of-possession landlord when the shooting happened (see *Regina v Broadway-Bronx Motel Co.,*23 AD3d 255, 256 [1st Dept 2005]), and while it had the right to reenter the premises for the purpose of effecting repairs, there is no evidence that it retained control over the premises or was involved with how PJ’s operated its bar *(see Borelli v 1051 Realty Corp.,*242 AD2d 517, 518 [2d Dept 1997]). The 2009 stipulation of settlement between nonparty City of New York, AIMCO and PJ’s regarding a public nuisance action fails to raise a triable issue, because it expired by its own terms before the shooting and did not require AIMCO to do anything with regard to how the bar was being operated.

Furthermore, there are no triable issues as to whether AIMCO is liable to plaintiff for his injuries under the Dram Shop Act (General Obligations Law § 11-101) or Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65. There is no evidence that the shooter was underage or visibly intoxicated when the shooting occurred, or that AIMCO had sold him an alcoholic beverage.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.