alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-315]


Indiana Michigan Power Company; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Indiana Michigan Power Company (the licensee) to 
withdraw its August 4, 1995, application for proposed amendment to 
Facility Operating License No. DPR-58, for the Donald C. Cook Nuclear 
Plant, Unit Nos. 1, located in Berrien County, Michigan.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the technical 
specifications to allow for repair of hybrid expansion joint sleeved 
steam generator tubes.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on January 29, 
1997 (62 FR 4351). However, by letter dated January 6, 1998, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated August 4, 1995, and the licensee's 
letter dated January 6, 1998, which withdrew the application for 
license amendment. The above documents are available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
document room located at the Maud Preston Palenske Memorial Library, 
500 Market Street, St. Joseph, MI 49085.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of June 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John F. Stang,
Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate III-3, Division of Reactor 
Projects--III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-16650 Filed 6-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
# C_2015363EN.01003101.xml

| 3.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2015 — Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia v OHIM — Hautrive (COLOMBIANO HOUSE)

(Case T-387/13) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark COLOMBIANO HOUSE - Earlier protected geographical indication Café de Colombia - Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 363/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia (Bogota, Colombia) (represented by: A. Pomares Caballero and M. Pomares Caballero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Bertoli and Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Nadine Hélène Jeanne Hautrive (Chatou, France) (represented by: J. Beaumont, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 May 2013 (Case R 757/2012-5) relating to opposition proceedings between the Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia and Nadine Hélène Jeanne Hautrive.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 17 May 2013 (Case R 757/2012-5); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 17 May 2013 (Case R 757/2012-5);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia;

| 3. | Orders Ms Nadine Hélène Jeanne Hautrive to bear her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ms Nadine Hélène Jeanne Hautrive to bear her own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.

1

---
# Langley, Eustis Air National Guard visit DLA Aviation

/ Published March 29, 2016
RICHMOND, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Command Support Directorate hosted a DLA Aviation mission briefing event, March 16, 2016 on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, for 20 personnel from the 192nd Supply Chain Management Squadron, Virginia Air National Guard, Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia.The presentations focused on the Mission Impaired Capability Awaiting Parts (MICAP). Air Force Tech. Sgt. Janet Pelayo, materiel management career broadener with DLA Aviation, facilitated the briefings which included: weapon systems parts management, customer accounts and customer support specialists, demand and materiel planning, product specialist, product data support, and pre- and post-award contract actions.

The intent of the event was to educate Air National Guard attendees on DLA Aviation processes, meeting customer needs, ordering parts, and getting parts to the warfighter on time.

Pelayo said the attendees gained information to increase awareness, influence demands, and reduce future MICAP. She added they also learned how the MICAP processes work, and what attributes to delays.

After the event, Pelayo assured participants that DLA is only a phone call away and is working around the clock to get orders to the warfighter.
# Energy’s Lorton division creates baby boom

/ Published Sept. 10, 2015
LORTON, Virginia, Utility Services
#### People v Hewitt

2d Dept: 139 AD3d 754 (Westchester)

denied 8/19/16 (Stein, J.)
No. 09-10537.

#### Julian Lopez, Petitioner v. Michael Thurmer, Warden.

562 U.S. 845, 131 S. Ct. 88,

178 L. Ed. 2d 55,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5842.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 584.
#### Com. v. Costello

10/27/2015

297 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 118 A.3d 442
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3613-3614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1573]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2714]


International Telecommunications Advisory Committee (ITAC) U.S. 
Study Group A of the Telecommunications Standardization Sector (ITAC-
T); Meeting Notice

    The Department of State announces a meeting, under the 
International Telecommunications Advisory Committee (ITAC), of Study 
Group A of the Telecommunications Standardization Sector (ITAC-T). The 
meeting will be held Wednesday, February 18, 1998, beginning at 9:30 
a.m. and scheduled for all day, in Room 1207 of the Department of 
State, 22nd and C Street, NW, Washington, D.C.
    The purpose of ITAC is to advise the Department on policy, 
technical and operational matters and to provide strategic planning 
recommendations, with respect to international telecommunications and 
information issues. The purpose of this meeting is to develop United 
States positions for upcoming ITU-T meetings dealing with standards 
activities of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). In 
particular, the meeting agenda will include preparation for planned 
ITU-T meetings of (1) Study Group 3 (Tariff and Accounting Principles 
including related telecommunications economic and policy issues) 
scheduled for June 3-12, 1998; and (2) Study Group 2 (Numbering and 
Routing) to be held March 3-13, 1998. Questions regarding the agenda or 
ITAC-T Sector activities in general may be directed to William Kirsch, 
Department of State (202 647-0197), fax number (202 647-7407).
    All participants may join in discussions, subject to instructions 
of the chair. In this regard, entry to the building is controlled. If 
you wish to attend, please send a fax to (202) 647-7407 at least 24 
hours before the

[[Page 3614]]

meeting, providing name, affiliation, date of birth and social security 
number, to arrange for pre-clearance. One of the following valid photo 
ID's is required for admittance: U.S. driver's license with picture, 
passport, government ID (company ID's are not accepted). Enter from the 
``C'' Street Main Lobby.

    Dated: January 12, 1998.
William J. Kirsch,
Chairman, ITAC-T Sector.
[FR Doc. 98-1573 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16507]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service

30 CFR Parts 202, 216, and 250

RIN 1010-AC23


Royalties on Gas, Gas Analysis Reports, Oil and Gas Production 
Measurement, Surface Commingling, and Security

AGENCY: Mienrals Management Service (MMS), Interior.

ACTION: Final rulemaking; corrections.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: MMS published in the Federal Register of May 12, 1998 (63 FR 
26361), a final rule commonly known as the ``GVS rule'' that updated 
production measurement, surface commingling, and security requirements 
and made other amendments. The MMS needs to make several minor 
corrections to the final regulations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective June 29, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kumkum Ray, Engineering and Operations Division at (703) 787-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 20, 1998 (63 FR 27677) MMS corrected 
the effective date of the final rule and made two other technical 
corrections to the final rule. As published and subsequently corrected, 
the final regulations still contain several errors which may prove to 
be misleading and are in need of correction.

Corrections of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on May 12, 1998 of the final 
regulations which were the subject of FR Doc. 98-11803, is corrected as 
follows:


Sec. 250.182  [Corrected]

    1. On page 26372, in the third column, in Sec. 250.182(g), the 
first sentence is corrected to read ``What correction factors must I 
use when proving meters with a mechanical-displacement prover, tank 
prover, or master meter?''
    2. On page 26373, in the second column, in Sec. 250.182(k), the 
word ``hydrogen'' is corrected to read ``hydrocarbon''.


Sec. 250.183  [Corrected]

    3. On page 26373, in the second column Sec. 250.183(b)(1) is 
corrected to read ``Submit a written application to, and obtain 
approval from, the Regional Supervisor before commencing gas production 
or making changes to previously approved measurement procedures.''
    4. On page 26373, in the third column, in Sec. 250.183(b)(7) the 
word ``Btu'' is corrected to read ``(Btu)''.


Sec. 250.184  [Corrected]

    5. On page 26374, in the second column, Sec. 250.184(a)(1) is 
corrected to read ``Submit a written application to, and obtain 
approval from, the Regional supervisor before commencing the 
commingling of production or making changes to previously approved 
commingling applications.''

    Dated: June 15, 1998.
William S. Cook,
Acting Chief, Engineering and Operations Division.
[FR Doc. 98-16507 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
Form of Stock Option Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.6 
  

			
	 	 
	 NOTICE OF GRANT OF STOCK OPTIONS
 AND OPTION AGREEMENT
  
	 	 Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation
 ID: 77-0138960


  

					
	 (Optionee Name)
	 	Option Number:	  	                                      
     
	 (Address)
	 	Option Plan:	  	2001 Plan
	 (City, State, Zip Code)
	 	Employee ID:	  	                                      
     

  
 You have been granted a Stock Option
to purchase Common Stock of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation (the “Company”), subject to the terms and conditions of the Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and this Stock Option Agreement as
set forth below. 
  

			
	 Date of Grant:
	  	                                      
                                        
                                        
      
	 Total Shares Granted:
	  	                                       
                                        
                                        
      

	 Exercise Price per Share:
	  	                                       
                                        
                                        
      

	 Total Exercise Price:
	  	                                       
                                        
                                        
      

	 Type of Option:
	  	 (Incentive or Non-Qualified Stock Option)

	 Expiration Date:
	  	                                       
                                        
                                        
      


  
 This option shall be
exercisable, in whole or in part, according to the following vesting schedule: 
  

			
	 Number of Shares

	  	 Vest Date


	 (number of shares period 1)
	  	(vest date period 1)
	 (number of shares period 2)
	  	(vest date period 2)
	 (number of shares period 3)
	  	(vest date period 3)
	 (number of shares period 4)
	  	(vest date period 3)

  

 This Option may be exercised for a period of thirty (30) days after termination of employment from the Company or such longer period as may be applicable upon Death or Total and Permanent Disability of Optionee, or by
other written agreement with the Company, according to the terms and conditions of the Plan, but in no event after the Expiration Date set forth above. 
  
 By your signature and the Company’s signature below, you and the Company agree that these options are granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the
Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation 2001 Stock Incentive Plan. 
  

  

			
	  

 Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation
	  	
 Date

		
	  

 (Optionee Name)
	  	
 Date
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, George Zippel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ George Zippel

George Zippel
President and Chief Executive Officer
July 11, 2008

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re
Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
No. 10-5911.

#### Johnny Jay Lacy, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 941, 131 S. Ct. 358,

178 L. Ed. 2d 231,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7184.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 379 Fed. Appx. 316.
If these walls could talk: Political paraphernalia under the Hatch Act
 
  By DLA Office of General Counsel and Office of Public Affairs
  Not all communication is electronic. And not all prohibited political activity is written or spoken. Even a small campaign button in your work space could violate the Hatch Act, depending on several factors. To help the workforce get a better understanding, an attorney from the Defense Logistics Agency’s Office of General Counsel weighs in on a few scenarios involving politically themed office decorations.  **Can I display a button or poster pertaining to a current political campaign on the wall of my cubicle or office?** With limited exceptions for personal photographs, you may not display a button, poster, photo, screen saver or any other item that advocates for or against a partisan political office, candidate or political party.  **How about paraphernalia from a past (but recent) campaign?** If it advocates for or against a political candidate still running for or serving in office, you may not display it — even if it's from a previous campaign. The same goes for a political party still in operation. However, if the paraphernalia is from a party that's no longer running candidates (such as the Whigs, or the Constitutional Union party, etc.), you may display it. The same is true if the candidate shown is no longer running for or holding office.  **So it would be OK to display a poster or button reading "JFK 1960” or "I Like Ike"? Or “Tippecanoe and Tyler Too”?** Yes, you're not advocating for a current partisan political office, candidate or political party when you display these items.  **The Act is clear that any federal employee can display any political bumper sticker on his or her vehicle at work. What if I want to display on the wall of my work area an expired license plate with a state-provided theme commonly associated with a political viewpoint? E.g., in Virginia, one can choose “Don’t Tread on Me,” “Choose Life,” or “Trust Women/Respect Choice.”** These examples are not partisan political activities and are not prohibited. While each issue may be identified with a particular party, the issue is not partisan political activity.  **Can I display on my workplace wall a political cartoon making fun of a candidate?** No. Political cartoons making fun of a partisan political candidate are still advocating on behalf of or against a partisan political party.  **What if I display political cartoons making fun of both candidates?** No. Displaying political cartoons making fun of both candidates is still advocating on behalf or against a partisan political party.  **What if the cartoons merely make fun of “liberals” or “conservatives” but not actual candidates or office holders? Am I permitted to share those with coworkers?** Maybe. If the cartoon can’t be identified with a partisan political office, candidate or party, you may display it. But if it can be identified with a partisan political party, candidate or office, you may not display it.  For more on the Hatch Act, consult the DLA Hatch Act Guidance homepage and the Hatch Act pages of the U.S. Office of Special Counselwebsite.
# CFC kickoff focuses on givers, not dollars

/ Published Oct. 23, 2015
PHILADELPHIA,
# National Preparedness Month: DLA Energy participates in FEMA readiness drills

/ Published Sept. 25, 2015
SALT LAKE CITY, Utah,
# Leadership reflection: Hector Hernandez 

/ Published April 27, 2022

                Area Manager Hector Hernandez, DLA Disposition Services Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.                            220427-D-D0441-4321                            Area Manager Hector Hernandez, DLA Disposition Services Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA photoVIRIN: 220427-D-D0441-4321

**Tell us a little about yourself.**

Texas native, a Marine Corps veteran, and Disp Svcs served in multiple DLA Disposition Services capacities to include HQ. Love to travel, always looking for a new challenge, and my zen = family.

**What is your area of responsibility?**

State of Hawaii.

**How long have you worked for the federal government, including military service?**

35 years.

**How long have you worked for DLA Disposition Services?**

19 years.

**Your favorite thing about this line of work?**

People and service.

**What is the best piece of advice someone has given you?**

Take Care of Number One First!

**Any noteworthy memories with DLA Disposition Services?**

The Big Challenge: Successfully transporting PCBs out of Japan in the early 2000s under very close regulatory and public scrutiny (unauthorized to dispose of PCBs in Japan), to return in 2015 to Japan as area manager and establish the first in-country PCB disposal contract in Japan. Full cycle.

**Is there a characteristic every leader should possess?**

Accountability.

**What is your leadership philosophy?**

Take care of number one, so to take care of team, so to meet mission in a safe and compliant manner (same holds true to family and life in general).

**How do you approach change?**

Change is a constant, so approach with open arms and embrace.

**What do you look for when evaluating top talent?**

An individual’s self being.

**Any best practices for achieving goals or accomplishing tasks?**

Assess, plan, execute and sustain.

**What might prevent people from being successful?**

A sense of entitlement.
No. 09-11121.

#### J.D.B., Petitioner v. North Carolina.

562 U.S. 1001, 131 S. Ct. 502,

178 L. Ed. 2d 368,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8528.

November 1, 2010.

Motion of Juvenile Law Center, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina granted.

Same case below, 363 N.C. 664, 686 S.E.2d 135.
No. 09-10696.

#### Darwain McDowell, Petitioner v. Cindi Curtin, Warden.

562 U.S. 849, 131 S. Ct. 99,

178 L. Ed. 2d 62,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5869.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5542.

#### Erin Richardson, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 928, 131 S. Ct. 316,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7499.

178 L. Ed. 2d 206,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1708

To renew the previously existing suspension of duty on parts of aircraft

generators.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 19 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To renew the previously existing suspension of duty on parts

of aircraft generators.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PARTS OF AIRCRAFT GENERATORS.

4 Heading 9902.85.03 of the Harmonized Tariff

5 Schedule of the United States is amended by striking

6 ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/94’’.

7 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by section

9 1 applies with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from
2

•S 1708 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

3 (b) RETROACTIVE PROVISION.—Notwithstanding sec4 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision

5 of law, upon a request filed with the appropriate customs

6 officer on or before the 90th day after the date of the

7 enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from

8 warehouse for consumption, of an article described in

9 heading 9902.85.03 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of

10 the United States that was made—

11 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

12 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en13 actment of this Act;

14 and with respect to which there would have been no duty

15 or a lower duty if the amendment made by section 1 had

16 applied to such entry or withdrawal, shall be liquidated

17 or reliquidated as though such entry or withdrawal oc18 curred on such 15th day.

Æ