alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014085EN.01001101.xml

| 22.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 12 December 2013 — L v M, R and K

(Case C-656/13)

2014/C 85/19

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud České republiky

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: L

Applicant:

Other parties to the proceedings: M; R and K

Other parties to the proceedings:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 12(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (1) of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, (‘the Brussels IIa Regulation’) be interpreted as establishing jurisdiction over proceedings concerning parental responsibility even where no other related proceedings (that is, ‘proceedings other than those referred to in paragraph 1’) are pending? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 12(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (1) of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, (‘the Brussels IIa Regulation’) be interpreted as establishing jurisdiction over proceedings concerning parental responsibility even where no other related proceedings (that is, ‘proceedings other than those referred to in paragraph 1’) are pending?

1

In the event of an affirmative answer to Question 1:

| 2. | Must Article 12(3) of the Brussels IIa Regulation be interpreted as meaning that acceptance expressly or otherwise in an unequivocal manner includes also the situation in which the party who has not initiated proceedings makes a separate application for the initiation of proceedings in the same case but immediately on doing the first act required of him objects that the court lacks jurisdiction in the proceedings previously started on the application by the other party? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must Article 12(3) of the Brussels IIa Regulation be interpreted as meaning that acceptance expressly or otherwise in an unequivocal manner includes also the situation in which the party who has not initiated proceedings makes a separate application for the initiation of proceedings in the same case but immediately on doing the first act required of him objects that the court lacks jurisdiction in the proceedings previously started on the application by the other party?

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 388, p. 1.

1

---
# ‘Primary-Level Field Activities Around the Agency’: November/December Loglines available

/ Published Nov. 25, 2015
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
The November/December issue of Loglines magazine, “Primary-Level Field Activities Around the Agency,” is now available in print and online. The issue takes an in-depth look at how the field activities within the Defense Logistics Agency work to support warfighters worldwide. Highlights include:
      - DLA Aviation’s procurement efforts on a part for the B-1 Lancer fleet.
      - DLA Energy’s rebalance of fuel in the Pacific theater helps ensure fuel is in the right place, at the right time, for its customers. 
      - DLA Troop Support’s Maintenance and Repair Operation provides customized support for facilities maintenance, public works and civil engineering around the world.
      - A look at WebFLIS, an official source logisticians can use for accurate, up-to-date information on supply items.
      - DLA Distribution’s use of performance-based logistics to improve materiel readiness and cut storage costs.

This issue also includes a question-and-answer column with DLA Senior Enlisted Leader Army Command Sgt. Maj. Charles Tobin, a look at Enterprise Process Management and an overview of DLA’s Mission Assurance Working Group. In addition, a history piece details Army Lt. Gen. Andrew T. McNamara’s tour as a quartermaster at war in North Africa.

Printed copies of Loglines are available throughout DLA’s locations. There is also a video detailing the issue.
Page 1 of 1 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

MEMORANDUM

DATE: May 9 , 201 3

SUBJECT: Response to Iprodione Preliminary Work Plan Comments Regarding Rice

FROM: James Parker, Chemical Review Manager

Risk Management and Implementation Branch 1

Pesticide Re

- evaluation Division

TO: Iprodione Registration Review Docket ( EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2012

- 0 392 )

On December 14 , 2012, the Agency initiated a 60 day public comment period for the iprodione

registration review docket, which ended on February 12, 2013

. During the public comment period, the

Agency recei ved several comments from FMC

, which included a comment regarding appropriate

iprodione uses for risk assessment . FMC request ed the Agency publish the final voluntary cancellation

order associated with a 2008 Federal Register Notice of Receip t of Requests for Amendments to delete

the rice use from certain iprodione registrations

. All other iprodione comments submitted by FMC

were addressed in separate response documents, which are available in the iprodione registration review

docket.

A Fed eral Register notice dated October 29, 2008 (Vol. 73, No . 210, 64327; EPA

- HQ

- OPP

2008

- 0761, FRL

- 8387

- 3) , announced the Agency’s receipt of a voluntary cancellation request to delete

iprodione use on rice for specific registrations

. No comments were receive d in response to this notice.

As a follow

- up to the cancellation request, EPA is in the process of publishing a final cancellation order

which will delete the use on rice from th e registrations identified in T able 1

.

Table 1 Iprodione Registrations with Requests for Amendments to Delete Use

No. EPA Reg. No. Product Name Delete From Label

1. 264

- 452 Iprodione Technical Rice

2. 264

- 482 Roval Brand 4 Flowable Fungicide Rice

3. 264

- 524 Roval Brand WG Fungicide Rice

4. 264

- 532 Roval Brand 50 SP Fungicid e Rice

5. 264

- 689 Roval Brand 75WG Fungicide Rice

6. 662222

- 144 Nevado 4F Rice

In preparation for a registration review Decision, the Agency will assess risks for all uses which

are identified on approved iprodione labels.
#### John Smith, a widower, *Appellant,*vs. Alice Presha, a widow, *Appellee.*

145 So. 839.

Decision filed January 9, 1933.

*Jones & Green,*for Appellant;

*M. S. McGregor,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees; it is therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
#### In the Matter of Leonard L. Germain, Jr., Appellant, v Town of Chester Planning Board, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

[64 NYS3d 578]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Town of Chester Planning Board dated December 2, 2015, granting the application of the respondent Primo Sports for site plan approval of the subject property, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (G. Walsh, J.), dated April 1, 2016, which granted the motion of the respondent Town of Chester Planning Board to dismiss the petition insofar as asserted against it for failure to join a necessary party.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal is deemed to be an application for leave to appeal from the order, and leave to appeal is granted *(see*CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion of the respondent Town of Chester Planning Board to dismiss the petition insofar as asserted against it for failure to join a necessary party is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for the joinder of Chill Factor Cooling, LLC, as a respondent in this proceeding, without prejudice to its right to assert any defenses or affirmative defenses, for the service of the notice of petition and petition by the petitioner upon Chill Factor Cooling, LLC, within 30 days after service upon the *634petitioner of a copy of this decision and order, for the service by Chill Factor Cooling, LLC, of an answer or motion directed to the petition, and for further proceedings thereafter.

Chill Factor Cooling, LLC (hereinafter Chill Factor), is a necessary party to this proceeding *(see*CPLR 1001 [a]; *Matter of Cybul v Village of Scarsdale,*17 AD3d 462, 463 [2005]; *Matter of Karmel v White Plains Common Council,*284 AD2d 464, 465 [2001]; *Matter of Artrip v Incorporated Vil. of Piermont,*267 AD2d 457, 457 [1999]) subject to the jurisdiction of the court, and therefore, the Supreme Court should have “order[ed] [it] summoned,” rather than granting the motion of the Town of Chester Planning Board to dismiss the petition insofar as asserted against it (CPLR 1001 [b]; *see Windy Ridge Farm v Assessor of Town of Shandaken,*11 NY3d 725, 727 [2008]; *Matter of Jenkins v Astorino,*110 AD3d 882, 885 [2013]; *Matter of Mega Sound & Light, LLC v Commissioner of Labor,*99 AD3d 800, 800 [2012]; *Matter of Lazzari v Town of Eastchester,*62 AD3d 1002, 1002-1003 [2009]; *see also Matter of Greens at Half Hollow, LLC v Suffolk County Dept. of Pub. Works,*147 AD3d 942, 943-944 [2017]). Accordingly, we reverse the order and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for further proceedings *(see Matter of Mega Sound & Light, LLC v Commissioner of Labor,*99 AD3d at 800; *Matter of Lazzari v Town of Eastchester,*62 AD3d at 1002-1003).

Dillon, J.P., Cohen, Connolly and Christopher, JJ., concur.
# Distribution’s Stoff retires after 24 years in the U.S. Air Force

/ Published Oct. 9, 2015
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
On Thursday, Oct. 8, surrounded by friends, coworkers and Defense Logistics Agency Distribution leadership, Air Force Col. Karen D. Stoff, retired after 24 years of active duty with the U.S. Air Force.

For the past two years, Stoff has served as the deputy director of DLA Distribution’s process and planning directorate. “All of the great things we have accomplished could not have occurred without the strong force of Col. Stoff,” said Sonya Gish, director of DLA Distribution's process and planning directorate.

Stoff received her commission from the U.S. Air Force Academy in May 1991, with a Bachelor of Science degree. She has been assigned to base-level Major Command, Numbered Air Force, Air Staff and joint positions. 

Additionally, Stoff has deployed to work in an Air Operations Center on a Joint Task Force staff, and in an Army Sustainment Brigade. 

As a graduate of the Advanced Studies of Air Mobility program, Stoff has served as the executive officer to a deputy combatant commander. She has also served as the commander of the Logistics Readiness Squadron at Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany and as the Deputy Mission Support Group commander at Laughlin Air Force Base, Texas.

“My plan is to have no plan, to take time to figure everything out,” explained Stoff. “It has been an honor to serve here at DLA Distribution. I am a better person because of the people of DLA, Distribution and Pennsylvania.”

Gish presented Stoff with the Defense Meritorious Service Medal for her service at DLA Distribution Headquarters, which began in August 2013.  Stoff was then presented with a certificate of retirement from the United States Air Force.

At the conclusion of the ceremony, Stoff asked Gish and Denise Kurtz, material accountability division chief, to join her on stage to present the staff of the process and planning directorate with t-shirts to thank them for their hard work and dedication.
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40507 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESSE VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-492-1

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Jesse Valdez has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Valdez has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief, Valdez’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH C IR . R. 42.2. Valdez’s motion to strike the Anders brief is DENIED. Valdez’s motion to proceed pro se is also DENIED. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
#### Ada Lugo, Respondent, v Belmont Boulevard Housing Development Fund Company, Inc., Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 877]

*560Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered on or about June 20, 2017, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, in this action where plaintiff was injured when the door to a trash compactor room closed on her thumb. Defendant failed to offer expert analysis to show that the condition of the door was not dangerous or defective, and instead relied on the testimony of its employees, who merely observed the door and found that it functioned properly *(see Siciliano v Henry Modell & Co., Inc.,*85 AD3d 534, 536 [1st Dept 2011]; *compare Hunter v Riverview Towers,*5 AD3d 249 [1st Dept 2004]).

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Sweeny, Gische, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34852-34853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-17016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Closed Meeting of the Naval Research Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Naval Research Advisory Committee Panel on Information 
Technology Interoperaility will meet to assess technologies and 
interoperability implications associated with information transfer and 
interaction among systems as well as between systems, especially among 
and between NATO and coalition forces. All sessions of this meeting 
will be closed to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, July 7, 1998 from 8:00 a.m. 
to

[[Page 34853]]

5:30 p.m., and on Wednesday, July 8, 1998 from 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Lockheed Martin Federal Systems, 
9500 Godwin Drive, Building 250, Room 1GG18, Manassas, Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Mason-Muir, Program Director, 
Naval Research Advisory Committee, 800 North Quincy Street, Arlington, 
VA 22217-5660, telephone number (703) 696-6769.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of meeting is provided in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. App. 2). All sessions of the meeting will be devoted to 
briefings and discussions involving technical examination of 
information related to interoperability among and between command, 
control, communications, computers and information systems/combat 
systems. These briefings and discussions will contain classified 
information that is specifically authorized under criteria established 
by Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national 
defense and are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive 
Order. The classified and non-classified matters to be discussed are so 
inextricably intertwined as to preclude opening any portion of the 
meeting. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. App. 2, section 10(d), the 
Secretary of the Navy has determined in writing that the public 
interest requires that all sessions of the meeting be closed to the 
public because they will be concerned with matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
section 552b(c)(1).
Matthews G. Shirley,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-17016 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
# Troop Support waves farewell flag for embroiderer

/ Published Nov. 22, 2022
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support celebrated the career of a civilian employee during a retirement ceremony Nov. 21, in Philadelphia.

Ngoc Phung Thi Le**,**an embroiderer in the DLA Troop Support Flag Room, was honored for her 14 years of federal service.

Air Force Col. Adrian Crowley, chief strategy officer, presided over the ceremony, and said he was proud to recognize someone who’s helped carry on a long-time tradition at Troop Support of hand embroidering presidential and vice presidential flags.

“It is a privilege for me to have this opportunity to celebrate Ngoc Phung, who has given so much of herself in support of our nation’s presidents over the years, and servicemen and women around the world,” Crowley said.  “Ngoc Phung, not only did you bring your dedication and commitment into our gem, the Flag Room, but you brought your dynamic talent and artistry to create the beautiful presidential and vice-presidential flags that are viewed on the global stage.”

The Flag Room is the sole producer of the presidential and vice-presidential flags, and its staff are considered the “Betsy Rosses of the 21st century,” for their patriotic flag making. The office also creates a variety of other flags for military and government partners.

Le began her career in 2008 as a sewing machine operator and an embroiderer. Over her 14 years in the flag room, she has hand embroidered several flags including presidential and vice-presidential flags, as well as those for the Air Force, Space Force, high school and university ROTC programs, and Army battalions and brigades.

She said that although her career at Troop Support was not necessarily long-lived, the memories from her time at the organization will stay with her forever.

“Fourteen years of service is a short time, but I’m grateful of my time at DLA,” Le said. “Thank you for allowing me to celebrate my retirement with this wonderful ceremony.”

During the ceremony Le was presented a certificate of retirement, a retirement memento, a pin of recognition, as well as a star note and commander’s coin from DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Eric Shirley. Le’s husband Trieu Thanh Dang was also presented with a commander’s spouse certificate of appreciation.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Felton, Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 840]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (W. Miller, J.), rendered March 11, 2016, convicting him of criminal possession of a forgery device, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Rivera, J.P., Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
#### Jane Hom, Also Known as Jane Zullo, Respondent, v George Hom, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 903]

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered April 10, 1992, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Maraño, J.), entered December 17, 2001, which, inter alia, denied his motion to vacate the divorce judgment, and (2) an order of the same court entered December 24, 2001, which denied his motion, among other things, to compel certain discovery.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court correctly denied the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment of divorce *(see Culp v Culp,*117 AD2d 700 [1986]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.
# Susquehanna’s Wilhide named Employee of the Week

/ Published Feb. 26, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
Greg Wilhide, packaging specialist with DLA Distribution Susquehanna has been named Employee of the Week.

Due in large part to his hard work and dedication, Wilhide was able to revise and update the entire Wood Packaging Material program within a one-year period, making it one of the most recognized in DLA Distribution. 

Greg works tirelessly to improve packaging issues and to ensure material coming onto the depot is correctly packaged and labeled. He routinely contacts the ICPs and Services, identifying vendor trend data to ensure corrective actions are taken.

Considered the “most knowledgeable packaging specialist” in the distribution center when it comes to packaging issues, the 11-year DLA employee continuously makes improvements to the WPM program, making it one of the most recognized in DLA Distribution.