alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014184EN.01003902.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/39

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2014 — Kolarova v REA

(Case F-88/13)

((Civil service - Staff of the Research Executive Agency - Preliminary issues - Objection of inadmissibility - Powers conferred on the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment - Delegation to the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) - Appeal against the decisions of the PMO - Appeal against the delegating institution - Manifestly inadmissible))

2014/C 184/64

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Desilava Kolarova (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Research Executive Agency (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou, Agent and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

The application to annul the dismissal of the applicant’s request for her mother to be treated as a dependent child under Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Ms Kolarova is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the Research Executive Agency. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Kolarova is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the Research Executive Agency.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 234 (Thursday, December 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 73202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29040]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Office of the Secretary

Exercise of Authority Under the Immigration and Nationality Act; 
Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 4, 2013, DHS published a notice in the Federal 
Register, announcing a Secretarial determination under section 
212(d)(3)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 
1182(d)(3)(B)(i), as amended. DHS inadvertently omitted three words 
from that notice. With this document, DHS is making three typographical 
corrections to that notice: inserting the words ``alien,'' ``in,'' and 
``or.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas J. Perry, Assistant General 
Counsel for Immigration Enforcement, (202) 282-9822.

Correction

    Correct FR Doc. 2013-26263 as follows:
    1. In the Federal Register of November 4, 2013, in FR Doc. 2013-
26263, on page 66037, in the first column, correct the sixth through 
ninth lines to read:

    respect to an alien for solicitation of funds or other things of 
value for; solicitation of any individual for membership in; the 
provision of material support to; or who

    Dated: November 29, 2013.
Christina E. McDonald,
Associate General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2013-29040 Filed 12-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-9M-P
```
Exhibit 23.1



            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-4  No.  333-117179)  of  Dollar  Financial  Group,  Inc.  and in  the  related
Prospectus of our report dated August 27, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
financial  statements of Dollar  Financial Group,  Inc.  included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2004.


                                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                         ---------------------
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 15, 2004
No. D-2489.

#### In the Matter of John M. Moran.

562 U.S. 808, 131 S. Ct. 396,

178 L. Ed. 2d 262,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7651.

October 4, 2010.

A response to the Rule to Show Cause having been filed, it is ordered that the Rule to Show Cause is discharged, and the order suspending John M. Moran from the practice of law in this Court, dated July 26, 2010, is vacated.

Former order, 561 U.S. 1045, 131 S. Ct. 43, 177 L. Ed. 2d 1132, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5556.
1

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2602

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Mucio Montesinos-Montiel, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 24, 2006 

Filed: April 27, 2006

___________

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

With a certificate of appealability granted by the district court,1

 Mucio

Montesinos-Montiel appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned opinion.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
No. 10-6419.

#### Ronnie Blade, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 988, 131 S. Ct. 430,

178 L. Ed. 2d 334,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8293,

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 297.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 258 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to establish fees for medical 

services provided in units of the National Park System, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2019 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK (for himself and Mr. TIPTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to establish fees 

for medical services provided in units of the National 

Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEES FOR MEDICAL SERVICES. 

4 (a) FEES AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary may estab5 lish and collect fees for medical services provided to per6 sons in units of the National Park System or for medical 

7 services provided by National Park Service personnel out8 side units of the National Park System. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 258 IH

1 (b) NATIONAL PARK MEDICAL SERVICES FUND.— 

2 There is hereby established in the Treasury a fund to be 

3 known as the ‘‘National Park Medical Services Fund’’. 

4 The Fund shall consist of— 

5 (1) donations to the Fund; and 

6 (2) fees collected under subsection (a). 

7 (c) AVAILABILITY OF AMOUNTS.—All amounts depos8 ited into the Fund shall be available to the Secretary, to 

9 the extent provided in advance by Acts of appropriation, 

10 for the following in units of the National Park System: 

11 (1) Services listed in subsection (a). 

12 (2) Preparing needs assessments or other pro13 grammatic analyses for medical facilities, equipment, 

14 vehicles, and other needs and costs of providing serv15 ices listed in subsection (a). 

16 (3) Developing management plans for medical 

17 facilities, equipment, vehicles, and other needs and 

18 costs of services listed in subsection (a). 

19 (4) Training related to providing services listed 

20 in subsection (a). 

21 (5) Obtaining or improving medical facilities, 

22 equipment, vehicles, and other needs and costs of 

23 providing services listed in subsection (a). 

24 (d) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this section: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 258 IH

1 (1) FUND.—The term ‘‘Fund’’ means the Na2 tional Park Medical Services Fund established by 

3 subsection (b). 

4 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

5 the Secretary of the Interior. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2013226EN.01000802.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/8

---

Action brought on 11 June 2013 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-321/13)

(2013/C 226/15)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and N. Yerrell, acting as agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Commission Directive 2010/61/EU of 2 September 2010 adapting for the first time the Annexes to Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the inland transport of dangerous goods to scientific and technical progress (1) and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Commission Directive 2010/61/EU of 2 September 2010 adapting for the first time the Annexes to Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the inland transport of dangerous goods to scientific and technical progress (1) and, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Commission Directive 2010/61/EU of 2 September 2010 expired on 30 June 2011.

---

(1)  OJ 2010 L 233, p. 27.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence J.
Madden, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley ACT of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the date of the financial statements contained therein.

/S/ LAWRENCE J. MADDEN
----------------------------------------------------
Lawrence J. Madden
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 17, 2004

                                       46
No. 10-5698.

#### Thomas Floyd Landis, Petitioner v. Virginia.

562 U.S. 965, 131 S. Ct. 463,

178 L. Ed. 2d 294,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8078.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47834) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Director Option Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Synplicity, Inc. of our report dated January 23,2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Synplicity, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Palo Alto, California 

March 14, 2003
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Benton and Bray 

Argued at Richmond, Virginia 

ROBERT RAYFIELD JONES 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1142-96-2 PER CURIAM 

 JUNE 17, 1997 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND 

James B. Wilkinson, Judge 

 Patricia P. Nagel, Assistant Public Defender 

(David J. Johnson, Public Defender, on 

brief), for appellant. 

 Ruth Ann Morken, Assistant Attorney General 

(James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on 

brief), for appellee. 

 This appeal raises the issue whether the trial judge erred 

in refusing to give to the jury the proffered instruction on 

parole. For the reasons more particularly stated in Mosby v. 

Commonwealth, 24 Va. App. 284, 482 S.E.2d 72 (1997), we affirm 

the trial judge's refusal to give the instruction. 

 Affirmed. 

Benton, J., dissenting. 

 For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Walker v. 

Commonwealth, ___ Va. App. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (1997), 

(Benton, J., dissenting), I would reverse the ruling and remand 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

for a new trial.
2017-0770.

#### Columbus Bar Assn. v. Striff.

On certification of default. Christopher Williams Striff Jr., Attorney Registration No. 0085421, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio, is hereby suspended from the practice of law for an interim period.
# DLA Joint Reserve Force Director visits DLA Distribution San Joaquin

/ Published March 29, 2020
TRACY, Calif., 
The Defense Logistics Agency Director of the Joint Reserve Force, Navy Reserve Rear Adm. Grafton Chase, visited DLA Distribution Expeditionary San Joaquin March 8 at DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California.

The morning kicked off with Chase providing his Joint Reserve Force overview to the reserve unit. The topics covered included the JRF team organization, support to DLA, shaping fiscal year 2020, leading change, fiscal year 2020 mission support, growing the culture and the way ahead.

                Defense Logistics Agency Joint Reserve Force Director Navy Reserve Rear Adm. Grafton Chase is talking with Christoval Chaparro, materiel handling equipment instructor, while observing the Navy reservists training on the MHE.                            DLA Joint Reserve Force Director visits DLA Distribution San Joaquin                            Defense Logistics Agency Joint Reserve Force Director Navy Reserve Rear Adm. Grafton Chase is talking with Christoval Chaparro, materiel handling equipment instructor, while observing the Navy reservists training on the MHE.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Annette SilvaVIRIN: 200319-D-LB125-0002

Chase ensured the unit understood where they fit into the Joint Reserve Organization and conveyed the importance of prior planning for reserve support eliminating the need to be reactive.

Upon conclusion of the brief, DLA Distribution San Joaquin commander Marine Col. Tiffany Harris discussed the cohesive relationship with the reserve unit supporting the mission at San Joaquin.

Next, Chase was taken on a tour in the mission area and had the opportunity to see the reservists working in the mission areas. The first stop was the Consolidation and Containerization Point. The CCP is the Strategic Distribution Platform for the USINDOPACOM area of responsibility.

The tour continued in the Unitized Group Rations area. The distribution center is the sole Department of Defense provider of Unitized Group Ration-Heat and Serve and UGR-M option meals. The San Joaquin team assembles these meals for the services and specifically assembles the UGR-M for the U.S. Marine Corps.

The last stops of the tour included Warehouse 13 where he had the opportunity to observe the reservists completing materiel equipment training. The last stop was at Warehouse 17 where the team was working with Stock Positioning.

After the tour, Chase returned to Warehouse 16 to tour the reserve unit’s spaces and was provided the unit overview presented by the DLA Expeditionary Distribution Support Unit San Joaquin’s Commanding Officer Navy Cmdr. Christopher Lewis. Further, he had the opportunity to have lunch with his Sailors.
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, Michael Feinsod, certify that:    1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameritrans Capital Corporation;2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 15, 2010/s/ Michael R. Feinsod
Michael R. Feinsod
Chief Executive Officer
#### Com. v. Kearns

09/30/2015

323 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 1063
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1662]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2249]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceedings

January 20, 1998.
    Petitions for reconsideration and clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice 
and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of 
these documents are available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 
M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to 
these petitions must be filed by February 10, 1998. See Section 
1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rule (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an 
opposition must be filed by February 20, 1998.
    Subject: Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish 
Competitive Service Safeguards for Local Exchange Carrier Provision of 
Commercial Mobile Radio Service. Implementation of Section 601(d) of 
the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (WT Docket No.96-162)
    Number of Petitions Filed: 3.
    Subject: Rules and Policies on Foreign Participation in the U. S. 
Telecommunications Market (IB Docket No. 97-142). Market Entry and 
Regulation of Foreign-Affiliated Entities (IB Docket No. 95-22)
    Number of Petitions Filed: 7.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1662 Filed 1-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
1The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1062

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota

Tory Collins, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 18, 2000

 Filed: March 1, 2000

___________

Before McMILLIAN, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, 

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Tory Collins appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for

the District of Minnesota sentencing him following his guilty plea to a felon-inpossession charge under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). For reversal, appellant argues the

district court erred in denying his motions for downward departure under U.S.S.G.

§§ 5K2.16, p.s., 4A1.3, p.s., and 5K2.0, p.s. Upon careful review of the record, we
-2-

conclude that the district court was aware of its authority to depart under the

provisions, but, in its discretion, determined that the circumstances did not warrant

departure. Thus, the decision is unreviewable. See United States v. Correa, 167 F.3d

414, 417 (8th Cir. 1999) (district court&s denial of downward departure unreviewable

where court considered arguments put forth by defense, found no extraordinary

circumstances warranting departure, and did not indicate it lacked authority to depart).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.