alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                EATON CORPORATION
                        2006 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K/A
                                   ITEM 15(b)
                                  EXHIBIT 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Richard H. Fearon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Eaton Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date:  March 26, 2007                       /s/ Richard H. Fearon
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Richard H. Fearon
                                            Executive Vice President -
                                            Chief Financial and Planning Officer



                                     Page 7
Exhibit 10.11

                              JOHN A. CATSIMATIDIS
                               823 Eleventh Avenue
                              New York, N. Y. 10019

================================================================================

Gristede's Foods, Inc.
823 Eleventh Avenue
New York, N.Y. 10019-3535

March 10, 2000

      Ref:  Audit of Gristede's Foods, Inc. Financial Statements for the Fiscal
            Year Ended November 28, 1999

Gentlemen:

      On November 10, 1997, Gristede's Foods, Inc. ("GRI") acquired 29
supermarkets and City Produce Distributors, Inc. (collectively, the "Food
Group") from entities wholly owned directly or indirectly by myself (the
"Acquisition"). The total consideration for the Acquisition was $40 million --
and was paid by GRI issuing $36 million in common stock and assuming $4 million
in liabilities owed by the Food Group to myself or entities wholly owned by
myself (the "Intercompany Liabilities")

      In connection with the Acquisition, GRI acquired (i) the inventories
located at the Food Group stores, (ii) various Food Group vendor trade
receivables, and (iii) certain other Food Group assets. In turn, GRI assumed an
equivalent amount of Food Group trade vendor payables and certain other Food
Group liabilities.

      In your audit examination of GRI's financial statements for FYE 11/28/99,
you have indicated that as of such date, GRI had approximately $600,000
remaining of the approximately $3.3 million in vendor trade receivables that
were acquired from the Food Group pursuant to the Acquisition (the "Remaining
Vendor Receivables").

      Should any portion of the Remaining Vendor Receivables be deemed by
yourselves to be uncollectible at GRI's next fiscal year end date of December 3,
2000 (the "Net Uncollectible Receivables"), I agree to have such Net
Uncollectible Receivables offset, dollar for dollar, against the Intercompany
Liabilities, provided, however, that the aggregate amount of such offsets do not
exceed $600,000. Subsequent recoveries against the Net Uncollectible Receivables
shall be available to pay Intercompany Liabilities.

      I agree not to permit the level of Intercompany Liabilities on GRI's books
to fall below $600,000 prior to the issuance of GRI's audited FYE 12/03/00
financial statements, to cover any contingent liability herein.

<PAGE>

      This letter supercedes and nullifies the prior February 27, 1999 letter,
"Ref.: Audit of Gristede's Sloan's, Inc. Financial Statements for the Fiscal
Year Ended 11/29/98" previously executed by myself.

Sincerely,


/s/ John Catsimatidis
---------------------
John Catsimatidis


                                        2
# Four Troop Support retirees celebrate 127 years of federal service 

/ Published March 6, 2024
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support held a retirement ceremony to honor the federal service of four civilian employees Feb. 29.

Alonzo Miller Jr., James Roberson Jr., Irene Johnson, and Madelynn Hall retired, after a combined 127 years of service, in front of a room full of family, friends and co-workers.

DLA Troop Support Deputy Commander Kishayra J. Lambert, who presided over the ceremony, said the retirees are taking over a century’s worth of knowledge and experience with them.

“You represent the ideals and values of our great workforce and our organization,” Lambert said. “You have made lasting impacts on the legacy of DLA Troop Support. Your service is indelibly marked in our record of success. Those years are characterized by the excellence embodied in the reputation of DLA Troop Support.”

During the ceremony each retiree was presented with a certificate of retirement, a DLA retirement memento, a pin of appreciation, and a coin and star note on behalf of Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Landis C. Maddox. 

Spouses received a letter of appreciation for their support over the years, which Lambert said was essential to the accomplishments of the individuals and to DLA Troop Support as a whole.

“A great part of one’s successes can be attributed to their support system, and that includes your love and support of these retirees,” she said. “Our civilian workforce is also like a family. We come to work to serve the warfighters, but we grow to know the people we work with side-by-side almost as much as we know our families at home.”

Miller retired as a quality control specialist from the Clothing and Textiles supply chain after 44 years of federal service.

Roberson retired as a contract specialist from C&T after 39 years of federal service.

Johnson retired as a general supply specialist from the Construction and Equipment supply chain after 35 years of federal service.

Hall retired as a business process analyst from the Process Compliance office after nine years of federal service.
##### 



Exhibit 24.2

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned director of both EaglePicher Holdings, Inc. and EaglePicher
Industries, Inc. hereby consents to and appoints John H. Weber, Thomas R.
Pilholski and David G. Krall, and each of them, as his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents with all power of substitution, for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the 2003 fiscal year of both EaglePicher Holdings, Inc. and
EaglePicher Industries, Inc., corporations organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Delaware and the State of Ohio respectively, and any and
all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the same as fully to all intents and purposes
as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
thereof.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand on this 12th day
of February, 2004.

|                                     |  | 
|------------------------------------ |  | 
|/S/ DANIEL C. WYLER

Daniel C. Wyler |  | 
|Director                             |  | 

105
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michael Gladden, Appellant, v Thomas Griffin, Respondent.

[49 NYS3d 920]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70 for a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ingram, J.), entered November 13, 2015, which, without a hearing, denied the petition and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

*860Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The contentions raised by the petitioner in support of habeas corpus relief could have been raised on his direct appeal from the judgment of conviction or in a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly determined that the requested relief was inappropriate (see *People ex rel. Franza v Connolly,*140 AD3d 803, 803-804 [2016]; *People ex rel. Johnson v Graham,*67 AD3d 1452, 1453 [2009]; *People ex rel. Curry v Girdich,*290 AD2d 912, 913 [2002]).

Balkin, J.P., Austin, Sgroi and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
No. 10-7.

#### Joseph A. Fessler, et ux., Petitioners v. Kirk Sauer Community Development, City of Wilkes-Barre, et al.

562 U.S. 889, 131 S. Ct. 228,

178 L. Ed. 2d 135,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7081.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 362 Fed. Appx. 241.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2519

To amend title IV of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act

of 1977, to provide for acquisition and reclamation of land adversely

affected by past coal mining practices, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 6 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. FORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend title IV of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, to provide for acquisition and

reclamation of land adversely affected by past coal mining practices, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 ACQUISITION AND RECLAMATION OF LAND AD4 VERSELY AFFECTED BY PAST COAL MIN5 ING PRACTICES

6 SECTION 1. Section 401(c) of the Surface Mining

7 Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1231(c))

8 is amended by inserting ‘‘or landslides caused by past coal
2

S 2519 IS

1 mining activities’’ after the phrase ‘‘land subsidence re2 sulting from underground coal mining’’.

3 SEC. 2. Section 407 (c) of the Surface Mining Control

4 and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1237(c)) is

5 amended by—

6 (1) inserting ‘‘or dwellings’’ after the phrase,

7 ‘‘may acquire any land’’;

8 (2) inserting ‘‘or dwellings’’ after the phrase,

9 ‘‘acquisition of such land’’; and

10 (3) inserting ‘‘except paragraph 4’’ after the

11 phrase, ‘‘to successful reclamation’’.

12 SEC. 3. Section 407(c) of the Surface Mining Control

13 and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1237(c)) is

14 amended by striking the period at the end of paragraph

15 (3); inserting ‘‘; or’’, and adding the following new para16 graph at the end:

17 ‘‘(4) acquisition of any interest in the threat18 ened site in lieu of performing reclamation activities,

19 will protect the public health and safety, and will re20 sult in significant cost savings to the Abandoned

21 Mine Reclamation Fund over performing emergency

22 reclamation activities.’’.

23 SEC. 4. Section 407(h) of the Surface Mining Control

24 and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1237(h)) is

25 amended by striking the sentence stating: ‘‘No part of the
3

S 2519 IS

1 funds provided under this title may be used to pay the

2 actual construction costs of housing.’’, and inserting in

3 lieu thereof: ‘‘Provided further, The Secretary or a State

4 with an approved program, is authorized to utilize avail5 able funds to acquire comparable property, when nec6 essary and when agreed to by the homeowner, and to relo7 cate private residences that are threatened by past mining

8 abuses in lieu of performing emergency reclamation activi9 ties at the site if such relocation will result in significant

10 cost savings to the program over performing emergency

11 reclamation activities, and safeguard the public health and

12 safety.’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald Williams, Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 263]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Larry Stephen, J.), rendered on or about January 11, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
From: Neuffer.Bill@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Neuffer.Bill@epamail.epa.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 3:38 PM To: Desai.Mausami@epamail.epa.gov; Jordan.Scott@epamail.epa.gov; Frank.Nathan@epamail.epa.gov; Sorrels.Larry@epamail.epa.gov Cc: Ndoh.Christina@epamail.epa.gov; Icenhour, Melissa K.; Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Short Summary of Teleconference with TFI re: Subcategorization/Nitric Acid plants TFI seems to w ant to subcategorize existing low and medium pressure units from the rest of nitric acid. TFI was not sure if any low and med lines have been subject to this NSPS thru mod/reconstruct We said it was very difficult if not impossible to have a subcategory ba sed on hypothetical TFI will gather info on whether any low/ med line has been subject to this NSPS thru mod/reconstruct TFI said NSCR could not be changed if mod/recon st occur. I said I was not sure that was true. TFI - new line s will be high or dual pre ssures TFI will submit written material on their proposal. I mention ed historical test data using Method 7 E without the proper procedures was of little value. Tina, Melissa, Susan, Feel free to add your comments. Bill Neuffer Metals and Minerals Group Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (D 243 - 02) US Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone - 919 - 541 - 5435 Fax - 919 - 541 - 3207 E - mail - neuffer.bill@epa.gov Office Location: 1 09 TW Alexander Drive RTP, NC (D 231C) Overnight mail address: US EPA Mail Code D243 -02 109 TW Alexander DriveRTP, NC 27709
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Twenty Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack C. Bridges, Executive Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jack C. BridgesJack C. Bridges Executive
Vice-PresidentMarch 21, 2007Date
# Land and Maritime highlights components of workplace culture 

/ Published Feb. 18, 2016
NORFOLK, Va., *Editor’s note: This is the first in a series of articles highlighting the recently revised tenets of the Land and Maritime Way and the DLA employees who exemplify them to help Land and Maritime continue its commitment to warfighter support.*
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 34214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16806]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting (Revised Notice of Meeting)

AGENCY: United States Enrichment Corporation.

SUBJECT: Board of Directors.

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m., Saturday, June 20, 1998 (previously scheduled 
for June 19, 1998).

PLACE: Telephonic meeting.

STATUS: The meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Privatization of the Corporation.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elizabeth Stuckle at 301/564-3399.

    Dated: June 19, 1998.
William H. Timbers, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-16806 Filed 6-19-98; 2:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 8720-01-M
# C_2014071EN.01000901.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 13 December 2013 — VAS ‘Ceļu satiksmes drošības direkcija’, Latvijas Republikas Satiksmes ministrija

(Case C-664/13)

(2014/C 71/15)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Administratīvā apgabaltiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: VAS ‘Ceļu satiksmes drošības direkcija’, Latvijas Republikas Satiksmes ministrija

Respondent: K. Nīmanis

Question referred

Must Article 12 of Directive 2006/126/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences, in conjunction with the first sentence of the second recital in the preamble thereto, be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides that the only means of proving that a person is normally resident in that State (Latvia) is the declared residence of that person? ‘Declared residence’ must be understood as meaning the obligation of the person, in accordance with the national legislation, to be registered in a state register, in order to notify his accessibility at the declared residence for the purposes of his legal relations with the State and the local authorities.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 403, p. 18.

---
# DLA Distribution shipping COVID-19 vaccines to overseas troops

/ Published Dec. 22, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
The Defense Logistics Agency is partnering with the Department of Health & Human Services on the Operation Warp Speed COVID-19 vaccination mission for Defense Department vaccination locations outside the continental United States and the Navy fleet. The mission includes receipt, issue, transportation and delivery of COVID-19 vaccines.

DLA has received the first Defense Department shipment of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine at DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, and is immediately packaging the vaccines for shipment today to overseas and Navy fleet locations.

DLA is leveraging well-defined cold chain management capability and will parallel its seasonal influenza vaccine model to store and ship material. To maintain auditability and customers’ trust, the distribution center employees are also tracking shipments by lot number and destination.

DLA Distribution offers best value supply chain solutions through a broad range of services including storage, distribution, customized kits and specialized packaging as well as transportation support and technology development. Customers include the U.S. Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force and other agencies. Headquartered in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, DLA Distribution operates a global network of 24 distribution centers that employ over 9,000 employees worldwide. DLA Distribution is a Major Subordinate Command of the Defense Logistics Agency.

DLA Distribution Susquehanna is the eastern DLA Strategic Distribution Platform with facilities at New Cumberland and Mechanicsburg, providing military and commercial repair parts, clothing and textiles, medical supplies and industrial and electronic components to military customers throughout the United States and the world. 

DLA Distribution Susquehanna is home to the largest distribution facility in DoD - the Eastern Distribution Center, located in New Cumberland.
J~

\ IED STyT~

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

$ ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 z = 

0 

q ~ PROj ~G~\ 

J A N - 6 2010 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Casey Gadbury 

Director, National TRU Program 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Gadbury: 

On December 17, 2009, the Department of Energy (DOE) Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) 

requested the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) approval of several additional items at 

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to be used to perform waste characterization. This 

includes the Central Characterization Project's (CCP) IQ3 Gamma Assay System, nondestructive assay (NDA) system as a Tier 1 change and Visual Examination (VE) of CH waste, 

which you believed to be a Tier 2 change. 

However, the Tier 2 determination is incorrect; implementation at any waste 

characterization site of a new technique for waste characterization has always been evaluated as a 

Tier l change. For example, the addition of VE at ANL-CCP for remote-handled (RH) waste 

was approved as a Tier 1 change in June 2008. 

When each these changes are considered ready to be evaluated by EPA for approval, 

please send relevant documentation with your request. Once we receive that information we can 

schedule an on-site evaluation of these changes. 

If you have any questions, please contact Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422 or Rajani 

Joglekar at (202) 343-9462. 

Sincerely, 

Ifit-1- ~ 

Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Electronic Distribution 

Alton Harris, DOE HQ 

David Moody, CBFO 

Vernon Daub, CBFO 

Ava Holland, CBFO 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO 

J. R. Stroble, CBFO 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO 

Steve Zappe, NMED 

Allison Pangle, CTAC 

Wayne Ledford, CTAC
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY AS  OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 2000  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,787
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,787
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,960
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,223)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,787
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,235)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,235)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,235)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)




</TABLE>
#### Com. v. McDade

08/17/2016

25 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 93