alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2468 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2468

   To permit the Secretary of Agriculture to make available certain 
amounts for FmHA farm ownership, operating, or emergency loans, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 27 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

   Mr. Conrad (for himself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Dorgan, and Mr. Bumpers) 
 introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read 
                       the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permit the Secretary of Agriculture to make available certain 
amounts for FmHA farm ownership, operating, or emergency loans, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF AMOUNTS FOR FMHA FARM OWNERSHIP, OPERATING, 
              OR EMERGENCY LOANS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Agriculture--
            (1) from the date of enactment of this Act until September 
        30, 1994, may transfer funds so as to make available--
                    (A) the amounts that would otherwise be available 
                for gross obligations for the principal amount of 
                direct farm ownership or emergency loans as authorized 
                by sections 308 and 309 of the Consolidated Farm and 
                Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1928 and 1929); and
                    (B) the amounts that would otherwise be available 
                for the costs of such direct farm ownership or 
                emergency loans (including the cost of modifying loans, 
                as defined in section 502 of the Congressional Budget 
                Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 661a));
        for any gross obligations or costs of farm ownership, 
        operating, or emergency loans or credit sales, except that the 
        amounts that would otherwise be available for such costs of 
        such emergency loans may be expended only for such costs of 
        guaranteed subsidized operating loans or credit sales; and
            (2) after September 30, 1994, may not expend funds, or 
        disburse any new loans, made available by a transfer described 
        in paragraph (1) for fiscal year 1994.
                                 <all>
```
#### Brown v State of New York

4th Dept: 144 AD3d 1539

granted
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

****Pursuantto the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350),****Gregory M. McKee, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officerof Stressgen Biotechnologies Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:

 

**1.****                                     **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2005, to which this Certification isattached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

 

**2.****                                     **Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof and for the periods covered in this Periodic Report.

 

Dated:           August 8, 2005

 

**InWitness Whereof**, the undersigned have set their hands heretoas of the 8th day of August, 2005.

 

 
| /s/ Gregory M.  McKee |                                                |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Gregory M. McKee                                    |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                       |                                                     |  |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q towhich it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofStressgen Biotechnologies Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether madebefore or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
#### People v Jones (William)

2d Dept: 138 AD3d 1145 (Richmond)

denied 8/2/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
No. 10-5673.

#### Russell James Hodge, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 934, 131 S. Ct. 334,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7549.

178 L. Ed. 2d 217,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 935.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21153 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus THOMAS EDWARD HALEY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CR-120

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Thomas Edward Haley appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Haley argues that he was not convicted of a crime punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding one year because the state dropped the enhancement charges and convicted him of an offense that had a maximum sentence of not more than one year. He contends that he thus did not have a prior violent felony conviction that was punishable by a term of imprisonment inNo. 96-21153 -2- excess of one year as required by U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) and as defined in § 4B1.2, comment. (n.3). “`Prior felony conviction’ means a prior adult federal or state conviction for an offense punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, regardless of whether such offense is specifically designated as a felony and regardless of the actual sentence imposed.” § 4B1.2, comment.(n.3) (emphasis added). Haley’s prior conviction was for the offense of retaliation, a felony in the third degree punishable by imprisonment for a term of 2-10 years. The district court properly assessed Haley’s base offense level at 20. Haley argues that he did not have a prior felony conviction under § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) because his conviction for retaliation was after the commission of the firearms offense. Haley’s argument is foreclosed by United States v. Gooden , 116 F.3d 721, 724-25 (5th Cir. 1997), in which this court held that if the sentence for the prior conviction is imposed prior to sentencing on the firearms offense such that it qualifies for criminal history points, it constitutes a “prior felony conviction” for purposes of determining the base offense level under § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A).
AFFIRMED.
#### Jonathan S. Aaron et al., Appellants, v Deloitte Tax LLP, Respondent.

[50 NYS3d 279]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered August 22, 2016, deemed an appeal from *581judgment (CPLR 5520 [c]), same court and Justice, entered September 26, 2016, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, dismissing plaintiffs’ malpractice claim, and so considered, said judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The engagement letter, which stated that it covered a period of seven months, provided that any action brought relating to the engagement must be commenced within one year of the accrual of the cause of action. The accrual of plaintiffs’ accounting malpractice claim was on January 21, 2009, the date decedent signed the last document that was part of the estate tax plan formulated by defendant *(see Ackerman v Price Waterhouse,*84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]; *Williamson v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,*9 NY3d 1, 7-8 [2007]). This action was not commenced until September 2015, and is untimely.

Plaintiffs may not avail themselves of the continuous representation tolling doctrine because the limitations period was contractual, not statutory, and was reasonable. The engagement letter indicated that decedent, a sophisticated and experienced businessman, and defendant, did not necessarily expect the representation to continue after the plan was in place, since the engagement expressly ended approximately seven months after the agreement was signed (see *Executive Plaza, LLC v Peerless Ins. Co.,*22 NY3d 511, 518 [2014]).

Equitable estoppel is equally inapplicable because the engagement letter made clear that any estate tax plan defendant formulated was subject to challenge by taxing authorities. Moreover, the complaint alleged that in April 2009, within the limitations period, defendant advised plaintiffs that the estate plan would likely be closely scrutinized by the IRS (see *Putter v North Shore Univ. Hosp.,*7 NY3d 548, 553 [2006]).

Concur— Acosta, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Motion to take judicial notice denied. [Prior Case History: 2016 NY Slip Op 31604OJ).]
# Commander recaps successful 2015 in Columbus, provides glimpse into the next year

/ Published Nov. 9, 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio,
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 13, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127967 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 127967 

 COA: 252926 

Wayne CC: 01-007841-01 

THOMAS R. BRUNAS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would remand this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for resentencing 

pursuant to People v Babcock, 469 Mich 247 (2003), and People v Daniel, 462 Mich 1, 7-

8 (2000), and would direct that this case be reassigned to another judge for resentencing. 

p1006 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 13, 2005 

Clerk
No. 09-11210.

#### Joshua Michael Cogdell, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 867, 131 S. Ct. 160,

178 L. Ed. 2d 95,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6832.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 437.
#### Com. v. Leach 16

05/10/2016

6 EAL (2016)

16

. Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 62 A.3d 467
No. 10-6417.

#### Shemtov Michtavi, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 988, 131 S. Ct. 430,

178 L. Ed. 2d 334,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8263.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-1414.

#### Raymond L. Neal, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 832, 131 S. Ct. 121,

178 L. Ed. 2d 32,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6439.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.

Same case below, 68 M.J. 289.
## NO. 12

- 21

- 00091

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ROBERT HALLETT, M. D

. , APPELLANT

V.

KAYWIN CARTER, M.D., DAVID BAILEY, M.D., RAVINDER BACHIREDDY, M.D., AND MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CHI ST. LUKE'S HEALTH MEMORIAL LUFKIN , APPELLEE S §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 159TH

JUDICIAL DI STRICT COURT

ANGELI N

A COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure t o comply with the Texas Rul es of Appell ate
Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). Appellant, Robert Hallett, M.D

. , filed a notice of appea l on June 15 , 2021

. On June 16
, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the no tice of appeal failed to contain the information specifi cally r equired by Texas Rule s of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and Section 51.017(a) of the Te xas Civil Practice and Re medies Code. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.5 (service); see
also T EX

. C IV

. P RA C

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter ’ s record). The notic e warned
that, unless A ppellant filed a proper notice of appeal on or before July 16 , the appeal would be

refer red to the Court for dismissal. This deadline passed a nd Appellant has not filed a compliant notice of appeal or otherwise responded to this Cour t ’ s June 16 notice

. Be cause Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 9.5 and Section 51.017(a)
, the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (on its own initiative after giving ten days ’2 notice to all parties, appellate court may dismiss appeal if appeal is subject to dismissal because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time). Opinion delivered July 30, 2021

. Pane l consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.3 

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 3 0 , 2021

NO. 12

- 21

- 00091

- C V

ROBERT HALLETT, M.D. , Appellant V. KAYWIN CARTER, M.D., DAVID BAILEY, M.D., RAVINDER BACHIREDDY, M.D.,

AND MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF TEXAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A CHI ST. LUKE'S HEALTH MEMORIAL LUFKIN , Appellee s

Appeal from the 159th District Cour t
of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV

- 00065

- 20

- 02 )

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellat e record; an d the same being considered, it is the opi nion of this Court that this appeal sh ould be d ismissed

.

It is therefore OR DERED, ADJUDGED an d DECREED by this Court that the appeal be
, and the same is, hereb y dismissed ; and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Pa nel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Employee Reflection: Ken Reiner
 
  Environmental Protection Specialist Ken Reiner Ken Reiner plays a drum set on a stage.
        Music
            Ken Reiner, a Environmental Protection Specialist with DLA Disposition Services plays the drums on his own time.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: DLA
                    
                    VIRIN: 220707-D-YU183-007Can you tell us about yourself? I am a Veteran of the USAF, married with two sons and a professional musician. Describe your job in a sentence or two. What do you do specifically? Oversee and manage Hazardous Waste removal contracts as well as provide customer service for numerous Hazardous Waste generating sites. How long have you worked for the federal government including military service? Officially 24, but actually, 27 years. The first few years were as a term employee and don’t count for retirement. How long have you worked for DLA Disposition Services? 23 years. What is your favorite memory with DLA Disposition Services? The old crew working together for the local sales auctions. What aspects of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction and why? Providing customer service to our Hazardous Waste generators. What is the best piece of advice someone has given you? Hard work pays off and treat others as you would want to be treated. What kind(s) of training and education helps your work performance in your current role? Too many Hazardous waste trainings to list, they all assist in our job knowledge and performance What would you say have been your major contributions to your organization this year? No matter what challenges we face, I provide the best customer service possible for our generators and warfighters. Where do you see yourself five years from now? Hopefully retired or soon to be retired. Lol. Playing music full time again and working in the outdoor industry Tell us something that most people might not know about you or your directorate. My career as a professional musician and that I have toured all over the world with some very famous people. What is your best memory of working here? I loved having the sales auctions, meeting all the people, collecting all the money for the warfighter. What was your first job? Retail sales for an outdoor sporting goods company Who’s your biggest influence? My father. Name your favorite/recent book(s) you have read. With two kids I have no time for books. Lol. What are some of your passions outside of work? Music, the outdoors, sports, and my family. What is your favorite quote? One of my favorite movie quotes “You are going to shoot your eye out kid”. I say this when my kids do something stupid. What did you want to be when you grew up? A rich rock star. Who is your hero? My father. If you could choose to do anything for a day; what would it be? Play drums on tour with Prince. What’s the most thrilling and or adventurous thing you have ever done? Perform a concert in front of 20,000 people and go scuba diving.
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 11


                 MOBILE AMERICA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 UNAUDITED COMPUTATIONS OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

 QUARTERS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND 1996 AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND
                                     1996


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Quarters Ended June 30      Six Months Ended June 30        
                                                   1997         1996           1997          1996           
                                                ----------   ----------     ----------    ----------        
                                                                                                            
<S>                                             <C>          <C>            <C>           <C>               
Net Income                                      $2,085,689   $2,037,347     $3,652,381    $3,470,737        
                                                ==========   ==========     ==========    ==========        

Weighted average                                                                                            
Common shares outstanding                        6,271,888    6,296,379      6,271,888     6,296,379        
                                                                                                            
Effect of weighting treasury stock acquired              0            0              0             0        
                                                ----------   ----------     ----------    ----------        

Common and common equivalent shares                                                                         
 used in computing earnings per share            6,271,888    6,296,379      6,271,888     6,296,379        
                                                ==========   ==========     ==========    ==========        
Earnings per share                              $     0.33   $     0.32     $     0.58    $     0.55        
                                                ==========   ==========     ==========    ==========        
</TABLE>
# Adaptive acquisition: Unifying the interagency

/ Published Feb. 18, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Acquisition University speaks with two Defense Logistics Agency leaders about efforts to unify interagency agreements with the Department of Health and Human Services and Federal Emergency Management Agency.Listen below as DLA Acquisition Deputy Director Roxanne Banks and David Kless, DLA’s executive director of operations, talk about integrating procurement, industrial base expansion and best practices for succeeding in a joint environment.
#### Nauta v. W.C.A.B. (Marshall - Industrial)

04/20/2016

952 MAL (2015)

Denied

No. 1499 CD 2015
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                         MARINE SHUTTLE OPERATIONS INC.

                          COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             PERIOD ENDED            PERIOD ENDED
                                                               MARCH 31,              MARCH 31,
                                                                 1999                    1998
                                                        ---------------------    -----------------------
<S>                                                           <C>                      <C>        
Net income (loss ) for the period attributable to
basic earning (loss) per share                                $ (2,129,225)            $ (185,217)

Net income (loss) for the period attributable to
diluted earnings per share                                    $ (2,129,225)            $ (185,217)

Weighted average shares outstanding                             33,403,274             20,020,000

Dilutive stock options                                                   -                      -

Total shares for primary and fully diluted earnings
per share                                                       33,403,274             20,020,000

Primary earnings (loss) per share                                  $ (0.06)               $ (0.01)
Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share                            $ (0.06)               $ (0.01)

</TABLE>
No. 10-148.

#### Estate of James F. Sheppard, by Its Co-Personal Representative, Michael E. McMorrow, Petitioner v. Jessica Schleis, et al.

562 U.S. 1003, 131 S. Ct. 506,

178 L. Ed. 2d 371,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8544.

November 1, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin denied.

Same case below, 324 Wis. 2d 41, 782 N.W.2d 85.