alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dollar  Financial  Group,
Inc. (the "Company") for the twelve months ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 and Rule 13a - 14(b) or Rule 15d - 14(b) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jeffrey A. Weiss
-------------------------------------
Jeffrey A. Weiss
Chief Executive Officer
September 15, 2004
No. 09-1577.

#### Mark Baker, Petitioner v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.

562 U.S. 841, 131 S. Ct. 220,

178 L. Ed. 2d 48,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5995.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 476.
#### IN THE MATTER OF MORGAN W. SCOTT.

(Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 914)

(412 SE2d 839)

Decided December 4, 1991.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Viola S. Drew, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

Per curiam.

The State Bar of Georgia has filed two formal complaints, SCD Nos. 879 and 914, against the Respondent alleging that he settled client’s cases and failed to properly account for funds entrusted to him in a fiduciary capacity. These cases are presently pending before the Special Master. There are additional grievances of a similar nature pending against the Respondent which are still under investigation.

The State Bar of Georgia filed a petition under the provisions of Bar Rule 4-108, requesting an emergency suspension until all pending cases and grievances against Respondent have been concluded.

The Respondent was served with this petition and responded by admitting conduct in violation of Standard 65 of Bar Rule 4-102, admitting that he was a threat to his clients and the public as charged in the petition filed by the State Bar, and seeking acceptance of his voluntary request for suspension of his license to practice law.

The Special Master recommended to this Court that the voluntary request for suspension by Respondent be accepted and that Respondent be suspended accordingly.

The recommendation of the Special Master is hereby accepted and adopted by this Court. The Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in this State until such time as all disciplinary proceedings and grievances now pending against him are concluded. The Court further directs that Respondent comply with the provisions of Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

*All the Justices concur.*
#### Jhensy Rodriguez, Appellant, v J. Gonzalez Garcia et al., Respondents.

[62 NYS3d 267]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Donna Mills, J.), entered April 5, 2017, which denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Plaintiff established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting an affidavit averring that while she was stopped in traffic, the vehicle operated by defendant Garcia struck her vehicle from behind. In opposition, defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact, as they did not provide a non-negligent explanation for the collision *(see Castaneda v DO&CO N.Y. Catering, Inc.,*144 AD3d 407 [1st Dept 2016]; *Cruz v Lise,*123 AD3d 514 [1st Dept 2014]; *Dicturel v Dukureh,*71 AD3d 558, 559 [1st Dept 2010]). Plaintiff’s motion was not premature due to the lack of plaintiff’s deposition, because the information as to why defendants’ car struck the rear end of plaintiff’s car reasonably rests within defendant driver’s own knowledge *(see Castaneda*at 407; *Johnson v Phillips,*261 AD2d 269, 272 [1st Dept 1999]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Gische and Moulton, JJ.
#### Com. v. Kriegner

03/23/2016

956 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 495
No. 10-5904.

#### James D. Tinsley, II, Petitioner v. Rick Davis, Sheriff, Henderson County, North Carolina, et al.

562 U.S. 983, 131 S. Ct. 417,

178 L. Ed. 2d 326,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8311.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 254.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 41106 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
YAIR ESTRADA

- FIGUEROA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 806

- 1

Before DAVIS , JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Yair Estrada

Figueroa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Estrada

- Figueroa h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1 6 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-41106 Document: 00513080106 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015No. 14

- 41106

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-41106 Document: 00513080106 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-5134 STEPHEN N. VALLARI and BARBARA D. VALLARI,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 06-CV-761, Judge Lawrence J. Block. ON MOTION ORDER The appellants move without opposition for a 6-day extension of time, until April 21, 2009, to file their response to the court's November 7, 2008 order. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT APR 2 3 2009 Jeth CLERK 

# APR 2 3 2009 Date

cc: Sallie W. Gladney, Esq. Deborah K. Snyder, Esq. s20
#### Com. v. Miles

10/14/2015

365 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1135
No. 09-10236.

#### Brian Keith Casper, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 950, 131 S. Ct. 77,

178 L. Ed. 2d 246,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7708.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Jus*247tice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 976.
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 75, 993

EX PA R TE M I C H A EL BE LT R A N , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 2 7 5 9 9 - A I N T HE 3 RD DI S TR I CT COURT

FROM AND ERS ON CO UNTY P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1.07 of the Te x as Code of Criminal Proce dure, the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for writ of habeas cor pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Cr i m . Ap p . 1 967). Applica nt was convic ted of ag g ravated assault on a public se rvant with a de adly wea pon and sente nced to life imprisonment. The Twelfth Court of Appea ls a ffirme d his conviction. Beltran v. State, No. 12-06-00390-CR (Tex. App. – Ty ler, November

30, 2007)
. Ap pli c a nt c on te nd s tha t hi s app ell ate cou ns el r end eredin eff e c tiv e a ssi sta

nc e be c a us e c ou ns e l,
w h o h a d b e e nr e ta in e d

to f il e a p e ti ti o n for dis c r e ti o n ar y r e v ie w , f

a il e d to ti me ly f il e o n e . Werema

nded this application to the trial cour t for finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. Appellate c ounsel filed af fi d av i t s wi th the trial court. B ased on those a ffidavits, the trial
cour t h as entered finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law that a ppellate c ounsel had be en re tained by Applicant to fil e a petition for discretionar y revie w but failed to timely file one. The trial court
rec ommends that relief

be g rante d. Ex parte W

ilson , 9 5 6 S. W. 2 d

2 5 ( T e x. Cr im
. Ap p . 1 9 9 7 )
. We find, there fore , that Appl i ca n t i s en titled to the opportunity to file an out-of

-time petition for dis c re tio na

ry re vie w of the jud g me nt of the Tw e lf th Court of Ap pe a ls i n Ca

us e No
. 12 -0 6- 00 39 0- CR that aff irmed his conviction in Ca se No. 27,599 from the 3rd J udicial District Court o f A n d er son County . App lic ant s ha ll f ile his pe tit ion

fo r d isc re tio na

ry re vie w w iththe Tw e lf

th C ourt of Ap pe a ls wi thi n 3 0 d ay s o f t

he date on

wh ic h th is C ourt ’s mand a te iss ue s. Filed: September

10, 2008 Do no t pu bli sh
No. 12-8937.

#### Thornberg *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# DLA R&D and the Navy Postgraduate School visit DLA Distribution Norfolk

/ Published May 30, 2023
NORFOLK, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Norfolk, Virginia, hosted staff from DLA Research & Development’s strategic distribution and disposition team, DLA Distribution Headquarters and the Naval Postgraduate School in support of DDNV’s Material Processing Center fleet-informed forecasting project, May 12. Dr. Jefferson Huang, NPS, Navy Lt. Cmdr. Adam Davidson, NPS, Danielle Williams R&D SDD, Jack Holmes, R&D SDD and Jamal Smith, DLA Distribution Headquarters, visited DDNV’s MPC, toured the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) and held a mid-point project brief for the Fleet Type Commanders.

“The visit to DLA Distribution Norfolk, Virginia, was phenomenal. We were able to tour the Material Processing Center where we learned how inventory is inducted, where the inventory comes from, the different types of inventory received, how it is processed and how it is stored and sent to the destined ship. Additionally, the tour of the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower allowed us to better understand not only what the user’s needs are, but how they process and store the goods sent to them. It was an eye-opening experience to understand the process on the ship to better understand how the MPC supports the ship. The visit allowed us to gain additional insight on information that should be factored in for the Phase I Feasibility Study of workload predictability of the MPC. Thank you very much to Capt. Lewis, Mr. Creekmore, Lt. Cmdr. Doggett and the Norfolk team for hosting us,” said Williams.

DDNV’s Fleet-Informed Forecasting Project is a partnership between DDNV, DLA R&D, DLA Future Plans and NPS to develop a more predictive workload forecasting tool based on customer operational schedules rather than historical data alone. This effort will inform manpower requirements to meet customer demand throughout the year with the goal of delivering material to the end user as expeditiously as possible. This innovative effort is in line with Navy’s “Get Real, Get Better” initiative.

                Mark Ellefson, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Norfolk, Virginia, Material Processing Center director, left,  Jack Holmes, DLA Research and Development, Dr. Jefferson Huang, Naval Postgraduate School, Navy Lt. Cmdr. Adam Davidson, NPS,  Danielle Williams, DLA R&D and Jamal Smith, DLA Distribution Headquarters, visit DLA Distribution Norfolk May 12, 2023. Photo by Navy Lt. Cmdr. Robert Doggett                            DLA R&D and the Navy Postgraduate School visit DLA Distribution Norfolk                            Mark Ellefson, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Norfolk, Virginia, Material Processing Center director, left,  Jack Holmes, DLA Research and Development, Dr. Jefferson Huang, Naval Postgraduate School, Navy Lt. Cmdr. Adam Davidson, NPS,  Danielle Williams, DLA R&D and Jamal Smith, DLA Distribution Headquarters, visit DLA Distribution Norfolk May 12, 2023. Photo by Navy Lt. Cmdr. Robert Doggett            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Navy Lt. Cmdr. Robert DoggettVIRIN: 230515-D-D0441-0002
No. 10-5054.

#### James Barnes, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 901, 131 S. Ct. 234,

178 L. Ed. 2d 155,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6319.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 29 So. 3d 1010.
EXHIBIT 10.4



                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



Employer: Zenascent, Inc. (the "Company")

Employee: Steven J. Musumeci

Titles: Director of Corporate Development; General Counsel; Member of Board of
Directors

Compensation: $200,000 base salary; discretionary bonus provided it is within a
reasonable range of bonuses paid to other senior management

Term: 3 years, effective as of April 1, 2002

Warrants: Warrants (with a term of 7 years) to purchase 2,000,000 shares of
common stock of the Company; all warrants granted at beginning of employment
(April 1, 2002) and registered as part of first registration statement to be
filed by Company; 1,000,000 warrants at $0.50 strike price vested on a pro rata
basis on the first day of each month during the first year of employment (i.e.
83,333 shares each month), provided that if the Employee is terminated without
"cause" during the first year of employment, all 1,000,000 shares shall be
deemed fully vested prior to such termination; 500,000 warrants at $0.55 strike
price to be fully vested at beginning of second year of employment; 500,000
warrants at $0.60 strike price to be fully vested at beginning of third year of
employment; cashless exercise provisions, piggyback registration rights and
customary anti-dilution provisions; option by Employee to readjust strike price
of warrants in April 2003, such adjustment of the strike price to reflect on a
relative basis the same discount to the market price at the time of adjustment
as the initial strike price is to the average closing price for the 30 day
period prior to the date of grant

Fringe benefits: To include health insurance for Employee and family; company
vehicle; 4 weeks paid vacation

This agreement shall constitute a binding agreement of the Company. This
agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York.


Accepted by and Agreed to:

ZENASCENT, INC.

By: _______________________
Name: Jim DiLorenzo
Title: Executive Vice President


------------------------
STEVEN MUSUMECI

Dated: August 19, 2002
# Employee Spotlight: Melissa Lowe

/ Published Jan. 24, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs.*

**Name:** Melissa Lowe

**Organization/Directorate/Division:** DLA Aviation’s Supplier Operations Commodities Directorate’s Contract Administration Division (Customer Facing).

**How long have you worked for DLA:** 2 Years

**What is your job title**: Contract specialist

**Describe your job in a sentence or two**: I manage post award contracts providing any modifications needed to assist the vendor in getting the material to the warfighter.

**What do you like most about your job and why?** Every day is different and there’s always something new to learn. There’s always requests for different part numbers or changes to materials or the revisions, outlining requirements. Sometimes its fixing mistakes or others to add new aspects to the purchase order. Its exciting to see ways to do things that I hadn’t learned before and to see the types of changes being made.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction and why?** I like seeing things through completion, as well as how they are going to impact the warfighter. Having been in the Army, I am used to being on the requesting and receiving end of sustainment operations, but now it’s different. I’m getting to see how materials are being acquired to send to the warfighter.

**What do you see as your biggest challenge right now?** The biggest challenge I see right now is the global logistics challenges lingering from the pandemic. Even though few vendors are still facing shutdowns due to Covid, they are still having difficulty getting parts and raw materials to fulfill the contracts and delivery orders that we manage. The delays they are facing is causing delays in getting needed materials to the warfighter.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?** I enjoy reading and artsy stuff like drawing, cross stitch, and embroidery.

**Who is the most influential person in your life...past or present and why?** When I was part of the Army Reserve Officers' Training Corps at Bowling Green State University, Ohio, I had a professor of Military Science who always believed in me, even when I didn’t believe in myself. He helped an awkward, self-conscious kid become a confident officer and a budding contract specialist, ready to build a career in logistics and sustainment operations.

**What is your favorite military aircraft and why?** My favorite military aircraft is the Air Force C-5 Galaxy. First, its huge and I am amazed that we can get that much weight in the air. Secondly, the aircraft provides many options for logisticians to move a lot of cargo, be it moving vehicles or pallets. The roll-on roll-off capability is also pretty cool.
# DLA Distribution commander visits DLA Distribution Yokosuka

/ Published Dec. 6, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Navy Rear Adm. Grafton D. Chase, commander of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution and Navy Capt. Patrick C. Blake, commander of DLA Indo-Pacific, visited DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan, Nov. 14.

                Gabriela Franco-Padilla, Defense Logistics Agency Yokosuka, Japan, briefs Navy Rear Adm. Grafton D. Chase, DLA Distribution commander, second from left and Navy Capt. Patrick C. Blake, DLA Indo-Pacific commander, right, on DDYJ’s transportation team trucking operation, Nov. 14, 2022.                            DLA Distribution commander visits DLA Distribution Yokosuka                            Gabriela Franco-Padilla, Defense Logistics Agency Yokosuka, Japan, briefs Navy Rear Adm. Grafton D. Chase, DLA Distribution commander, second from left and Navy Capt. Patrick C. Blake, DLA Indo-Pacific commander, right, on DDYJ’s transportation team trucking operation, Nov. 14, 2022.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Distribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 221114-D-D0441-0011

Navy Cmdr. Ian G. Iliff hosted the senior leaders and opened the visit with an overview of the mission, vision, operation and capabilities of DDYJ. Iliff discussed the main location at Yokosuka as well as detachment locations at Yokohama, Sasebo, Okinawa and Iwakuni. During his presentation, he highlighted the hard work and dedication of Japanese, United States civilian and military employees.

Chase and Blake toured the facilities and warehouses and saw modernization efforts such as the vertical lift modules, which provide compact storage and improved productivity of binnable material. During the visit, they also met with DDYJ’s logistics partners from Commander, Navy Region Japan, Commander Seventh Fleet and Fleet Logistics Center Yokosuka.

                Navy Cmdr. Ian Iliff, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Yokosuka, Japan, commander, left, and Navy Rear Adm. Grafton D. Chase, DLA Distribution commander, second from left, watch Josh Ramones, third from left and Tye Messer, right, demonstrate vendor lift module operations during Chase’s visit to DDYJ Nov. 14, 2022.                            DLA Distribution commander visits DLA Distribution Yokosuka                            Navy Cmdr. Ian Iliff, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Yokosuka, Japan, commander, left, and Navy Rear Adm. Grafton D. Chase, DLA Distribution commander, second from left, watch Josh Ramones, third from left and Tye Messer, right, demonstrate vendor lift module operations during Chase’s visit to DDYJ Nov. 14, 2022.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Distribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 221114-D-D0441-0012
No. 10-5156.

#### Elmer Edward Burge, Jr., Petitioner v. Virginia.

562 U.S. 906, 131 S. Ct. 251,

178 L. Ed. 2d 166,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6870.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2466 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2466

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic 
      Petroleum Reserve more effectively, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 27 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

  Mr. Johnston (for himself and Mr. Wallop) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

           September 30 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic 
      Petroleum Reserve more effectively, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be 
cited as the ``Energy Policy and Conservation Act Amendments Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE.

    This title may be cited as the ``Energy Policy and Conservation Act 
Amendments of 1994''.

SEC. 102. TITLE I AMENDMENTS.

    Part D of title I of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act is 
amended in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251), by striking ``September 30, 
1994'' each time it appears and inserting ``June 30, 1996''.

SEC. 103. TITLE II AMENDMENTS.

    Part D of title II of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act is 
amended in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285), by striking ``September 30, 
1994'' each time it appears and inserting ``June 30, 1996''.
                                 <all>
```