alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C.  20549

                            FORM 10-Q/A

(Mark One)

[ X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
     SEPTEMBER 30, 1999

                               OR

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
     _____ TO _____

                    Commission File No. 1-935

                        QUESTAR GAS COMPANY
     (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

     STATE OF UTAH                                    87-0155877
(State or other jurisdiction of                 (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)              Identification No.)

P.O. Box 45360, 180 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84145-0360
(Address of principal executive offices)              (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(801) 324-5555

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.        Yes   X   No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

              Class            Outstanding as of October 31, 1999
Common Stock, $2.50 par value            9,189,626 shares

Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction
H(a)(1) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is filing this Form 10-Q with the
reduced disclosure format.
<PAGE>




                            SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                   QUESTAR GAS COMPANY
                                       (Registrant)



November 15, 1999                  /s/ D. N. Rose
                                   D. N. Rose
                                   President and Chief Executive
                                   Officer


November 15, 1999                  /s/ S. E. Parks
                                   S. E. Parks
                                   Vice President, Treasurer, and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
2017-0678.

#### State v. D.F.

Montgomery App. No. 27032, 2017-Ohio-2882. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. Judgment stayed pending appeal to this court.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Neill, J., dissent.
No. 09-10853.

#### Kenneth Edward Barbour, Petitioner v. Counselor Rose, et al.

562 U.S. 803, 131 S. Ct. 114,

178 L. Ed. 2d 4,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7821.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2338

To provide that for taxable years beginning before 1980 the Federal income

tax deductibility of flight training expenses shall be determined without

regard to whether such expenses were reimbursed through certain veterans educational assistance allowances.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 29 (legislative day, JULY 20), 1994

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To provide that for taxable years beginning before 1980

the Federal income tax deductibility of flight training

expenses shall be determined without regard to whether

such expenses were reimbursed through certain veterans

educational assistance allowances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN REIMBURSED FLIGHT

4 TRAINING EXPENSES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a taxable year be6 ginning before January 1, 1980, the determination of

7 whether a deduction is allowable under section 162(a) of
2

•S 2338 IS

1 the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 for flight training ex2 penses shall be made without regard to whether the tax3 payer was reimbursed for any portion of such expenses

4 under section 1677(b) of title 38, United States Code (as

5 in effect before its repeal by Public Law 97–35).

6 (b) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—If refund or credit

7 of any overpayment of tax resulting from the application

8 of subsection (a) is prevented at any time before the close

9 of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enact10 ment of this Act by the operation of any law or rule of

11 law (including res judicata), refund or credit of such over12 payment (to the extent attributable to the application of

13 subsection (a)) may, nevertheless, be made or allowed if

14 claim therefor is filed before the close of such 1-year pe15 riod.

Æ
#### Alexander Zelizo, as Administrator of the Estate of Brian J. Zelizo, Deceased, Appellant, v Mohammed S. Ullah et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[769 NYS2d 255]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Tingling, J.), entered September 19, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the cross motion of defendants-respondents Mohammed S. Ullah, Lydia & Son, Inc. and Mohammad A. Arif for summaiy judgment to the extent of dismissing plaintiffs wrongful death cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the cross motion denied in all respects, the cause of action for wrongful death reinstated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered May 15, 2003, which, upon granting plaintiffs motion for reargument, adhered to its prior decision, unanimously dismissed, without costs, in light of the foregoing *(see*CELR 5517 [a] [1]).

Contrary to the motion court’s finding that plaintiff failed to provide any evidentiary basis for a reasonable expectation of pecuniary loss on the part of the parents as a result of the death of their 23-year-old son, who was struck by a taxicab and died of his injuries a week later, plaintiff’s claim was supported by some evidence from which a jury may be able to infer that he and his wife suffered such loss.

Flaintiffs deposition testimony showed that the decedent was a cum laude graduate of the University of Notre Dame with improving job prospects as a financial analyst. Moreover, plaintiff testified, he had a close, loving relationship with his parents, was trying to repay them for his college expenses and had even sent them on an all-expenses-paid trip to Florida. Such testimony was some evidence that the decedent was predisposed to help his parents should they be in need, and that they had a reasonable expectation of future support *(see Hanson v County of Erie,*120 AD2d 135 [1986]; *Franchell v Sims,*73 AD2d 1 [1980]).

*274While the quantum of damages was not established, all plaintiff was required to do at this juncture was to establish some evidence of pecuniary loss. The calculation of the precise amount is a question for the jury *(Parilis v Feinstein,*49 NY2d 984, 985 [1980]; *Wachowicz v Czarnecki,*191 AD2d 994 [1993]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Williams, JJ.
No. 10-6152.

#### In re Eric Fair, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 825, 131 S. Ct. 370,

178 L. Ed. 2d 258,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7820.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001064435
<NAME>                        Cluett American Corp
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Apr-03-1999
<CASH>                          481
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   47,034
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     84,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                135,051
<PP&E>                          48,303
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  228,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           54,295
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     51,288
<COMMON>                        1
<OTHER-SE>                      (152,548)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    228,306
<SALES>                         81,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                81,099
<CGS>                           57,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   19,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                15
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              6,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                    278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (2,165)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (2,165)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0 
        


</TABLE>
NAIMA and EPA Meeting

August 31, 2011

2:00 PM – 4:00 PM

NAIMA Participants

1. Steve Aldridge – Knauf Insulation

2. Lauren Alterman – CertainTeed Corporation

3. Brian Baker – Knauf Insulation

4. Ken Gould – Owens Corning

5. Ron Hudson – Johns Manville

6. Mike Metz – Guardian Fiberglass

7. Mike Pettis – Owens Corning

8. Grover Thomas – Guardian Fiberglass

9. Brent Tracy – Johns Manville

10. Angus Crane – NAIMA

11. Christopher Martin – NAIMA
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anise Civil, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 874]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), rendered December 2, 2015, convicting her of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which *539could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id,.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Mastro, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Iannacci, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.  Consents of Experts and Counsel


                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




The Board of Directors
Dravo Corporation:

We   consent   to  incorporation  by  reference  in  registration
statements  Nos. 33-23632, 2-84462, 2-64137, 33-54179,  333-01689
and  333-01691  on Form S-8, No. 33-17356 on Form S-3,  Amendment
No. 1 to No. 2-87555 on Form S-8/S-3, and No. 2-71993 on Form  S-
16  amended by Form S-3 of Dravo Corporation, of our report dated
January  24, 1996 relating to the consolidated balance sheets  of
Dravo  Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,  1995  and
1994  and  the  related  consolidated statements  of  operations,
retained earnings, and cash flows and related schedules for  each
of  the  years in the three-year period ended December  31,  1995
which report appears in, or is incorporated by reference in,  the
December   31,  1995  annual  report  on  Form  10-K   of   Dravo
Corporation.  Our report refers to the adoption of the methods of
accounting  for  postretirement  benefits  other  than  pensions,
income taxes and postemployment benefits prescribed by Statements
of   Financial  Accounting  Standards  Nos.  106,  109  and  112,
respectively.


                                     /s/  KPMG PEAT  MARWICK LLP




Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 27, 1996
















                              23-1
Order entered October 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00521-CV

ALFRED HENDRICKS SR., Appellant

V.

DALLAS COUNTY, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. TX-13-30828

ORDER

We GRANT Appellant’s October 15, 2015 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to 

File an Amended/Corrected Motion to Dismiss and ORDER Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss be 

filed no later than November 16, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
No. 09-1431.

#### Loretta K. Kelly, Warden, Petitioner v. Leon Jermain Winston.

562 U.S. 947, 131 S. Ct. 127,

178 L. Ed. 2d 243,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7661.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 592 F.3d 535.
Exhibit 32.2

 

**                                                THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY                                                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                                                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                                      SECTION 906                                                                           OF THE                                                    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the"Company") on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), theundersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects,the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to The MonarchCement Company and will be retained by The MonarchCement Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

Dated:  August 14, 2006

                                                                                              /s/ Debra P. Roe                                                                                                                      Debra P. Roe, CPA                                                                                            Chief Financial Officer and                                                                                            Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael C. French, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael C. French

Michael C. French
Chief Executive Officer
May 8, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and will be retained by
Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*July 5,2017.*

2017-Ohio-5699.]

2016-1734.

#### State v. Kiser.

Sandusky App. No. S-15-030, 2016-Ohio-7338. Discretionary appeal accepted, judgment reversed, and cause remanded for application of *State v. Gonzales,*150 Ohio St.3d 276, 2017-Ohio-777, 81 N.E.3d 419.

Kennedy, J., dissents.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary information extracted from the financial
statements contained in the body of the accompanying Form 8-K and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> 0
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          55,205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,953
<PP&E>                                          11,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,437
<BONDS>                                        127,991
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,988
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,012
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,841
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,878
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,425
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,453
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,023)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (570)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Site visit highlights supply chain support, test lab capabilities 

/ Published July 28, 2023
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime leadership hosted a site visit with DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler at Defense Supply Center Columbus July 26.

The visit reinforced the ongoing partnership between the sister supply chains that manage millions of spare and repair parts worldwide for thousands of ground, sea and air-based weapon systems.

Kenneth Watson, deputy commander for DLA Land and Maritime, and Doug Nevins, acting acquisition executive, joined Tyler for a supply chain briefing followed by a tour of the Mechanical Product Test Center led by PTC staff. The center fulfills mechanical testing requirements on various products, and in recent years has led more than 2,400 projects supporting DLA Aviation. Tyler was able to see firsthand how the testing facility helps ensure DLA provides its customers with quality products in a reliable, cost-effective and timely manner.

Future in-person collaboration between DLA Land and Maritime and DLA Aviation counterparts is set for later this summer at DSCC, mirroring the robust 2022 session that brought together experts from both teams to discuss challenges and strategies.
No. 10-6108.

#### Geraldo A. Cruz-Castro, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 945, 131 S. Ct. 371,

178 L. Ed. 2d 239,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7226.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 632.
# C_2014031EN.01000401.xml

| 1.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 18 November 2013 — Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg

(Case C-580/13)

2014/C 31/04

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Coty Germany GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 8(3)(e) of Directive 2004/48/EC (1) be interpreted as precluding a national provision which, in a case such as that in the main proceedings, allows a banking institution to refuse, by invoking banking secrecy, to provide information pursuant to Article 8(1)(c) of that directive concerning the name and address of an account holder?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45).

1

---
# Active shooter training on DSCR geared towards preventing gun violence in the workplace

/ Published Dec. 19, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
Active shooter events, which the FBI defines as one or more individuals actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area, are on the rise in the United States.

During a five-year span, between 2017 and 2021, the number of incidents increased significantly, jumping from 31 to 61. Those shootings in 2021 happened in 30 different states, killing 103 people, and wounding another 140. The locations of where these events happened were random: grocery stores, schools, and warehouses.

While there are no final numbers for active shooter events so far in 2022, one only needs to go back less than two months when an employee of a Wal-Mart in Chesapeake, Virginia killed five co-workers, five people were killed and 18 others injured in a shooting at an LGBTQ club in Colorado Springs, Colorado and a shooting at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Virginia left three football players dead.

To better prepare the Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia workforce in the unfortunate event an active shooter incident should ever happen on center, Defense Logistics Agency’s Installation Management’s Security and Emergency Services conducted active shooter awareness and response training Dec. 6 and 14 in the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on DSCR. 

Don Bartlett, chief of DLA Installation Management Richmond’s Security Operations Branch and John O’Kleasky, DLA Installation Management Richmond’s antiterrorism officer, led the training sessions.

“Based on many tragic events, attendance and participation is more important than ever for this timely and relevant training. It’s incumbent upon all of us as a work community to keep each other and ourselves safe,” O’Kleasky said.

During the training sessions, Bartlett and O’Kleasky discussed active shooter case studies and lessons learned from them, incident response options, prevention through recognizing pre-violence behavioral indicators, surviving violent encounters and reporting suspicious activity. 

“I am hopeful that the workforce will continue to be vigilant and keep the conversation related to this topic perpetually relevant as we perform our duties in the workplace and beyond,” said O’Kleasky.