alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Aviation recognizes 2022 December Employees of the Month

/ Published March 6, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation December 2022 Employees of the Month Kenyetta Cunningham and Marcos Charles have tackled additional tasks and challenges with success and demonstrated a superior ability to exceed expectations within their sections at DLA Aviation. 

Employee of the Month is awarded to DLA Aviation non-supervisory civilian employees. Two recipients are selected based on individual general schedule pay levels – one from GS 1-9 (Category 1) and one from GS 10-13 (Category 2). Recipients receive a coin, a certificate of achievement from the DLA Aviation Deputy Commander Charlie Lilli, and a cash award. 

Cunningham, a management analyst within DLA Aviation at Warner Robins, Georgia’s Administration Staff Division, received the Category 1 award. 

Cunningham’s primary duties include overseeing the records management, human resources liaison, special emphasis and audit administration programs, as well as filling a vacant position as the commander’s administrative assistant at Warner Robins.

Per the award citation, Cunningham’s assistance and mentoring in direct support of the 2022 Combined Federal Campaign resulted in $892,669 in fund-raising contributions for the region. 

Throughout the rating period, Cunningham also served as one of the ambassadors for the 78 Air Base Wing Civilian Health Promotion Services for DLA Aviation Warner Robins. “Cunningham has disseminated valuable health information and scheduled monthly free health screenings for DLA Aviation WR personnel,” states Administrative Staff Support Division Chief, Jimmy Tran. “Her proactiveness with the program led to a healthier life and workforce.  

“Being recognized as the employee of the month for December is so unexpected yet refreshing,” said Cunningham. “I was reminded that my efforts and hard work have not gone unnoticed, and I am on the right path leading to success. I am just so grateful!” 

Marcos Charles is a sustainment specialist within DLA Aviation at Ogden, Utah’s Planning and Support Division. He was named the Category 2 award recipient. 

Per the citation, Charles manages a workload of over 600 national stock numbers valuing over $3,000,000 and provides assistance in support of the Industrial Prime Vendor Generation III contracts list. Through Charles’ diligence, 18 NSNs were moved to supportable status by expediting their purchase orders. 

Throughout the rating period, Charles also stepped-up to take control of another 200 NSNs for the 533RD Maintenance Squadron. He aligned the production schedule resulting in bring 88 end items valued at $387,472 to completion and delivered on time to the customer, thus achieving 90% material availability in this high visibility project.

“Charles continuously excels as a top performer within DLA Ogden’s 533RD Commodities Maintenance Group’s Planning and Support Section,” said the group’s section chief, Liskey. “His positive attitude and willingness to go the extra mile puts him at the top of the sustainment realm.”
# C_2014024EN.01001102.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Suceava (Romania) lodged on 22 November 2013 — Casa Județeană de Pensii Botoșani v Polixeni Guletsou

(Case C-598/13)

2014/C 24/21

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Suceava

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Casa Județeană de Pensii Botoșani

Applicant:

Defendant: Polixeni Guletsou

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 7(2)(c) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1) to be interpreted as including within its scope a bilateral agreement which two Member States entered into before the date on which that regulation became applicable and by which those States agreed to the termination of obligations relating to social security benefits owed by one State to nationals of the other State who had been political refugees in the territory of the first State and who have been repatriated to the territory of the second State, in exchange for a payment by the first State of a lump sum for the payment of pensions and to cover periods during which social security contributions were paid in the first Member State?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 416).

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Treyvon Newman, Appellant.

[57 NYS3d 413]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Del Giudice, J.), rendered July 21, 2015, convicting him of assault in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient with respect to the element of his intent to seriously injure the victim is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant shared an intent with his codefendant to cause serious physical injury *(see People v Hooks,*148 AD3d 930 [2017]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see *People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]; *People v Hooks,*148 AD3d 930 [2017]).

The Supreme Court erred in imposing consecutive sentences and in considering a crime of which the defendant was acquitted as a basis for sentencing (see *People v Newman,*153 AD3d 639 [2d Dept 2017] [decided herewith]). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing, and the sentences imposed on remittal are to run concurrently.

Dillon, J.P., Austin, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED  NOVEMBER 29, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Nov-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-29-1998
<CASH>                                         $53,794
<SECURITIES>                                   $0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  $5,091,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                   $0
<INVENTORY>                                    $18,425,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               $25,923,904
<PP&E>                                         $57,267,439
<DEPRECIATION>                                 $25,716,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 $60,706,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          $18,720,986
<BONDS>                                        $0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          $0
<PREFERRED>                                    $0
<COMMON>                                       $392,732
<OTHER-SE>                                     $14,136,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   $60,706,509
<SALES>                                        $157,462,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               $157,462,869
<CGS>                                          $94,282,306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  $94,282,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               $4,742,810
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $1,832,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                $(271,115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   $17,224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            $(271,115)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                $0
<CHANGES>                                      $0
<NET-INCOME>                                   $(288,339)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-2000     DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                               16738           58383
<SECURITIES>                        400000          200000
<RECEIVABLES>                      1252627         1799848
<ALLOWANCES>                        652040         1712000
<INVENTORY>                          15467          343068
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    827047          577542
<PP&E>                              244635          197175
<DEPRECIATION>                     (194788)        (181762)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1472891         1028712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               617549          491418
<BONDS>                                  0               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0               0
<PREFERRED>                              0               0
<COMMON>                             99051           99051
<OTHER-SE>                           (2338)          (2328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       1472891         1028712
<SALES>                            2582043         1864500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   2582043         1864500
<CGS>                               294869           22042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      2025171         2184624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  155606          195409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     299351         (338035)
<INCOME-TAX>                        153478          (31652)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0               0
<DISCONTINUED>                           0               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0               0
<CHANGES>                                0               0
<NET-INCOME>                        145873         (306383)
<EPS-BASIC>                         0.04           (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0           (0.08)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ckrush, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jan E. Chason, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2007


By:


/s/ Jan E. ChasonJan E. Chason
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Mr. Nick Parsons 

Environmental Engineer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/CCGEPA Denver (Region 8) 

In Re Docket ID: EPA-HQ-Oq-2010-0505 

Dear Mr. Parsons: 

 

As a physician living in Salt LakeCity, I am strongly opposed to any increase in oil and gas exploration 

in the Colorado Plateau. Our local air quality is literally lethal in the winter, with excess 

cardiopulmonary mortality being only the tip of the iceberg. Any activities that could increase smog 

forming pollutants such as nitrogen oxides, diesel truck or off road equipment particulates, or VOC’s 

that will add to our valley inversions (as increased oil/gas exploration in the Plateau would) should be 

out of the question. While I have sympathies to the need to develop natural gas in the short term as we 

try to form a low carbon economy, exploration should be limited to areas that won’t needlessly endanger 

civilian populations hemmed in by geographic barriers, and this is the situation we find ourselves in 

along the Wasatch Front. 

 

Many thanks for you consideration of my concern. 

 

 

Sincerely, 

 

Gary Kunkel, MD 

Assistant Professor of Medicine 

University of Utah 

Division of Rheumatology 

Re Docket ID: EPA-HQ-Oq-2010-0505

Gary Kunkel 

to: 

Nick Parsons 

08/02/2010 06:54 PM 

Show Details 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web4373.h... 8/9/2010
No. 10-5822.

#### Demethric Antwan Hinnant, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 938, 131 S. Ct. 349,

178 L. Ed. 2d 226,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7213.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 384 Fed. Appx. 276.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001027342
<NAME>                        ML Pfd. Capital Trust I
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-27-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-17-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-27-1996
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   283505200
<RECEIVABLES>                                  671356
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               671356
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284176556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          671356
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    275000000
<COMMON>                                       8505200
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284176556
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               671356
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                671356
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            671356
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   671356
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
# DLA Disposition Services help save retired Chief’s cabin from fire 

/ Published May 28, 2020
BATTLE CREEK, Mich, 
When Chief Petty Officer Paul Kerr retired from the Navy he never thought he would receive Defense Logistics Agency support again until a West Texas wildfire threatened his hunting cabin. 

Reports from the first day stated the Holcombe Road wildfire was very aggressive, burning an estimated 700 acres. The intensity led Crockett County firefighters, who initially responded, to request assistance from the Texas A&M Forest Service. The service maintains a statewide network of strategically-placed teams of firefighters and equipment to respond quickly when the call comes, and some of the equipment comes from DLA Disposition Services.

                A tripod wildlife feeder is surrounded by fire from the Holcombe Road wildfire. The image was captured by a trail camera who's support was damaged causing the odd angle.                            Fire                            A tripod wildlife feeder is surrounded by fire from the Holcombe Road wildfire. The image was captured by a trail camera who's support was damaged causing the odd angle.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: PHC Paul KerrVIRIN: 200419-O-DO441-1982 As the fire grew, threatening Kerr’s cabin, more fire departments came to fight the blaze. The fire burned for 19 days and consumed more than 25,000 acres.

Kerr said firefighters were able to save the buildings as the fire swept across the ranch. After the fire, he discovered from crewmembers that some of the equipment that had been used to save the ranch’s buildings was from DLA Disposition Service.

“Every command I was stationed at we used DRMO for one thing or another,” Kerr said.

He reflected that they would check with the local Defense Reutilization Marketing Office, now known as a DLA Disposition Services field site, to see if the inventory included anything they could use and turn-in items his unit no longer needed.

Kerr said it was interesting that even after retiring and moving back to his native Texas DLA Disposition Services is still having a positive impact on his life. 

Firefighting support involves a partnership between DLA Disposition Services, which collects used military equipment, and the U.S. Forest Service, whose state coordinators process requests and help ensure the equipment finds its way to firefighters that can put it to use.

Besides pitching in to fight fires, the Texas A&M Forest Service offers proactive support as well.  Their website states personnel study weather patterns, drought cycles and the status of vegetation across the state to predict when and where dangerous fire conditions may occur.
DLA Troop Support host 2024 Joint Subsistence Policy Board & Global Summit
 
  By  Maurice Matthews II
  The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Subsistence supply chain hosted the 2024 Joint Subsistence Policy Board and Subsistence Global Summit on May 14 and 15 in Philadelphia. 
 
“These two important events represent the Super Bowl for our Subsistence supply chain,” said Director of Customer Operations John Sheehan. “We conduct joint monthly meetings, "huddles" with all Joint Logistics Enterprise stakeholders that lead up to the JSPB. These monthly meetings are the JSPB Advisory Committee meetings. The JSPB and JSAC are codified in the DoD Manual 1338.10, which is the playbook for the DoD Food Service Program.”    
 
The JSPB convenes annually to develop and coordinate subsistence policy in the areas of nutrition, finance and accounting, sanitation, training, food service management information systems, and dining facility equipment & facilities, to ensure a robust and continuously improving food service programs in support of the Warfighter. 
 
The Subsistence Global Summit convenes every two years and is intended to keep the DoD subsistence Community abreast of DLA’s posture to support the global Class I requirements of the entire Joint Warfighter community. 
 
 DLA Troop Support acts in the role of the convenor, chairman, and host for the two events.  
“The JSPB and Subsistence Global Summit are two excellent opportunities to bring stakeholders together from across the Joint Logistics Enterprise for collaboration and information sharing,” said Capt. Tim Griffin, USN, Director, Subsistence supply chain. “All of which will be key to our continued success as we support warfighters around the globe in conflict.”  
In addition to DLA Troop Support leaders participating during the event, DoD senior leaders were also in attendance. “Ms. Leigh Method, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics, was a crucial participant in the two sessions,” said Chief of Subsistence Readiness Division, John Trunzo. “She attended both events—which demonstrated a recognition of both the significance and criticality of subsistence support at the highest echelons of our government.” 
 
 During the JSPB, members of the Subsistence supply chain shared current initiatives being undertaken to enhance subsistence support, such as outside the continental U.S prime vendor acquisitions, technology modernization, and the continental U.S prime vendor restructuring program. 
“Every decision we make as a subsistence enterprise must be made with contested logistics at the forefront and events like this will help us overcome those challenges,” Griffin added.
Exhibit 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 22, 2000
accompanying the financial statements of Earth Sciences, Inc. to Form S-8
Registration Statement deemed effective June 10, 1997, File No. 333-28851, Form
S-3 Registration Statement declared effective July 23, 1997, File No. 333-25465,
Form S-3 Registration Statement declared effective September 22, 1997, File No.
333-35135, Form S-3 Registration Statement declared effective February 25, 1998,
File No. 333-46199, and Form S-3 Registration Statement declared effective
September 24, 1999, File No. 333-76081 and Form S-3 Registration Statement
declared effective February 2, 2000, File No. 333-93075 of Earth Sciences, Inc.
and to the use of our name and the statements with respect to us, as appearing
under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statements.

/s/  Hein + Associates LLP
HEIN + ASSOCIATES
Denver, Colorado
April 10, 2000