alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert L. Demorest,certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MOCON, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sBoard of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date:  May 21, 2007
| /s/ Robert L. Demorest                 |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Robert L. Demorest                     |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer and President |   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |   |

 

----
#### Com. v. Smith35

12/29/2015

477 MAL (2015)

35

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 457
# DLA, SOUTHCOM deliver mobile hospital to Suriname

/ Published Aug. 11, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support provided a mobile hospital package to U.S. Southern Command, who officially donated it to the country of Suriname during a ceremony July 23 to assist in their COVID-19 relief efforts.

The field hospital was procured by DLA Troop Support’s Construction and Equipment supply chain for the Department of Defense’s Humanitarian Assistance Program, or HAP, and is part of a multi-phase effort to assist Caribbean, Central American and South American nations in the pandemic. Through the HAP, SOUTHCOM has assisted 28 nations in their area of responsibility with over $135 million of supplies and equipment.

To date, C&E has provided the program with 48 mobile hospital packages, and more acquisitions are in the works.

Troy Vokes, C&E plans and integration chief with the Executive Agent office, said although the circumstances for these procurements are unique, the processes are business as usual for the supply chain.

“This is normal operations for us in C&E,” Vokes said. “We support over 1.1 million warfighter and customer actions a year. We live and breathe ’Warfighter First.‘ In this case, our warfighter was a diplomatic mission supporting Suriname citizens fighting the virus.”

The contract for the mobile hospital , valued at $865,000, was awarded June 25, and the package arrived in Suriname July 16. To get the mobile hospital to Suriname in such an efficient manner, C&E had to stay in constant correspondence with a variety of stakeholders.

“For the Suriname effort, we coordinated military airlift through U.S. Transportation Command and [Air Force] Air Mobility Command via a Special Airlift Assignment Mission,” Vokes said. “Then we shipped the materials to Charleston Air Force Base and flew everything to Suriname on a C-17 Globemaster III aircraft.” 

The C&E team also coordinated offloading, customs clearances, transportation to the set-up location, training, the Suriname Presidential reception ceremony and the actual use of the hospital.

Marko Graham, C&E’s director of customer operations, said that good working relationships and open lines of communication are key to successful missions like this.

“The Suriname requirement came to SOUTHCOM and then DLA as extremely high priority due to the COVID-19 crisis,” Graham said. “We expedited [the process] to place the most quickly available mobile hospital package into Suriname in the shortest time possible within the rulesets we’re required to follow. We were able to do this because of the enduring professional relationships we have forged with all of our stakeholders.”

The mobile hospital, which is run by two diesel generators, can bed up to 70 patients.
No. 09-11033.

#### Ronald Ray Starner, Petitioner v. Butch Jackson, Superintendent, Nash Correctional Institution.

562 U.S. 859, 131 S. Ct. 133,

178 L. Ed. 2d 80,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5877.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*81Same case below, 367 Fed. Appx. 461.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas H. Sinton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of ProBusiness Services, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of ProBusiness Services, Inc.



                                    By:  /s/ Thomas H. Sinton
                                       -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Thomas H. Sinton
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    Date:  September 30, 2002


I, Steve E. Klei, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of ProBusiness Services, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of ProBusiness Services, Inc.

                                    By: /s/ Steven E. Klei
                                        ------------------------------
                                    Name:  Steven E. Klei
                                    Title: Executive Vice President,
                                           Finance, and Chief Financial Officer
                                    Date:  September 30, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Morgan, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 885]

Application *555by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 22, 1993 *(People v Morgan,*191 AD2d 649 [1993]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 11, 1991.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Eng, P.J., Roman, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.
No. 09-10534.

#### In re Elizabeth Campbell, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 87,

178 L. Ed. 2d 261,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7799.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 12-1886

KRISTO RUCI,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on December 23, 2013, should

be amended as follows:

On page 5, line 10, delete "on" and replace with "in".
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2460

To extend for an additional two years the period during which medicare

select policies may be issued.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. CHAFEE (for himself and Mr. DURENBERGER) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To extend for an additional two years the period during

which medicare select policies may be issued.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR ISSUANCE

4 OF MEDICARE SELECT POLICIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4358(c) of the Omnibus

6 Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 1320c–3

7 note) is amended by striking ‘‘3-year’’ and inserting ‘‘5-

8 year’’.
2

•S 2460 IS

1 (b) DEADLINE FOR EVALUATION.—Section 4358(d)

2 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1320c–3 note) is amended by strik3 ing ‘‘January 1, 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 1996’’.

4 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

5 The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect

6 as if included in the enactment of the Omnibus Budget

7 Reconciliation Act of 1990.

Æ
# Employee Spotlight: Jeremy Craft

/ Published Jan. 26, 2024
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Employee Spotlight focuses on outstanding non-supervisory Defense Logistics Agency personnel across DLA Aviation and at Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may nominate employees to be featured in this column by contacting DLA Aviation Public Affairs at*AvnPAO@DLA.mil*.*

**Name:** Jeremy Craft

**Organization:** Material Management Division, DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City  

**Years of service:** Six years

**What is your job title and what do you do specifically?**I am an inventory management specialist and I procure aircraft engine parts belonging to the Air Force’s B-1B Lancer, F-15 Eagle, E-3 Sentry and the KC-135R Stratotanker, to name a few. Part of my job is to resolve customer issues and provide status briefings to the customer, but I perform whatever task it takes to keep the supply chain moving.

**What do you like most about your job and why?**What I appreciate the most about my job is the teamwork within my division and how we can see the impact we have in our day-to-day operations when serving the warfighter and our customers.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction?  Why?**The most satisfying aspect of my job is knowing my hard work in procuring surplus material has been successful so the warfighter can continue to operate.

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?**If I spoke directly to the warfighter, I would first thank them for their service and dedication. Secondly, I would ask how my agency directly affects them and how we could serve them better.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?**Some of my passions outside of work include spending time with my family and doing freelance audio engineering work. Audio engineering is where I edit audio books, presentations and other projects for customers. I am also a published author of a suspense-horror story written for a teen audience. It took six months to finish the book and get it published. Writing a book has been a small goal of mine since childhood.

**Have you had a mentor that helped you grow in your career?  If so who, and how did they help?**A previous supervisor helped me the most in my career. He taught me how to effectively lead and support a team. I have taken a lot of his mannerisms and line of thinking with me as I’ve matured.

**Who is the most influential person in your life – past or present – and why?**Without a doubt, my mother is the most influential person in my life. Her strength and compassion has always been something I personally envy, and her ability to guide me and my brothers by herself is a testament to the lady she is. I absolutely adore her!
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:FAA-2012-0149 2011-NM-255-AD
No. 10-5336.

#### Willie Keith Jackson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 916, 131 S. Ct. 279,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7367.

178 L. Ed. 2d 184,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 391.
No. 10-5582.

#### Shone E. Wilkes, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 930, 131 S. Ct. 394,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7290.

178 L. Ed. 2d 209,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*210Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 295.
#### Philip A. Hofmann, Respondent, v Dina F. Hofmann, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 243]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis Crespo, Special Ref.), entered February 2, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant wife’s cross motion for certain relief with respect to the Hofmann 2012 Family Trust (Trust), and determined that any claims related to assets of the trust could not be asserted as equitable distribution claims in the divorce action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly determined that the wife’s requests for relief concerning the Trust could not be determined in the divorce action since the trust assets were not marital property subject to equitable distribution. It is undisputed that the wife voluntarily transferred her interest in the parties’ Michigan house to the husband to be held in the irrevocable family Trust, with the house as the Trust’s main asset. Further, the wife was fully aware of the specific terms of the Trust, as evidenced by her notarized signature on the Trust agreement. In general, trust assets are not considered marital property subject to equitable distribution where, as here, the parties are not trustees and have relinquished control over the trust assets *(see Markowitz v Markowitz,*146 AD3d 872, 873 [2d Dept 2017]; *Stewart v Stewart,*133 AD3d 493, 494-495 [1st Dept 2015], *lv denied*26 NY3d 919 [2016]).

*443We have considered the wife’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Andrias, Gische, Kern and Singh, JJ.
# Subsistence Pizza Fundraiser

/ Published Feb. 7, 2023
PHILADELPHIA
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Subsistence branch’s Culture Improvement Team hosted a Subsistence Pizza Fundraiser during lunch on February 7, 2023. This event was the first since the COVID-19 pandemic and is geared towards raising funds to host future events to raise morale for the supply chains at DLA Troop Support.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 6 

Honorable Gary Johnson 

Governor of New Mexico 

Santa Fe, NM 87503 

Dear Governor Johnson: 

1445 ROSS AVENUE, SUITE 1200 

DALLAS, TX 75202-2733 

· JUN 161999 

On November 6, 1998, you submitted formatting revisions to 

the New Mexico State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions 

.L.:.!.·::lu~J.e t:1.YL"·: t:ct.tor~s t.;.J 20 Ne:w H~x.i.co Administrative Code 

(NMAC) 2.70- Operating Permits and 20 NMAC 2.72- construction 

Permits. 

On October 9, 1998, the New Mexico Environment Department 

(NMED) presented the corrections to the Environmental Improvement 

Board for adoption, and the corrections became effective on 

November 14, 1998. The submittal also includes other supporting 

documents which are necessary for processing and approving this 

SIP submittal. 

We have reviewed the submission in accordance with the 

Environmental Protection Agency's policy for determining 

completeness of SIP submittals, and have determined that the 

submittal is administratively complete. We will be reviewing 

this revision for approval and will publish the appropriate 

action in the Federal Register. The NMED will be informed of our 

progress during this process. 

In addition, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

submitted an April 7, 1999, letter concerning vour intentions of 

'l'C.ble C, which was a correction to 20 NMAC 2. 72 - Construction 

Permits. According to your November 6 letter, the table was 

inadvertently left out during reformatting from the Air Quality 

Control Regulations into the NMAC format. The EPA does not 

consider the table as part of the current SIP, and intends to 

take no action on that portion of the November 6, 1998, 

submittal. 

If I can be of further assistance in this matter, please do 

not hesitate to contact me. 

Sincerely yours, 

IS! Jerry Clifford 

Gregg A. Cooke 

Regional Administrator 

Internet Address (URL) • hltp:/AYWw.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Prlrlled wHh Vegetable 011 Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15994]



[[Page 32865]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 060398A]


Marine Mammals

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that D. Ann Pabst, Ph.D., University of 
North Carolina at Wilmington, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, North 
Carolina 28403-3297, has been issued an amendment to scientific 
research Permit No. 1031.

ADDRESSES: The amendment and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289);
    Regional Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS, NOAA, One Blackburn 
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2298 (508/281-9250); and
    Regional Administrator, Southeast Region, NMFS, NOAA, 9721 
Executive Center Drive, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2432 (813/570-5301).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 23, 1998, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (63 FR 20171) that an amendment of permit No. 
1031, issued March 5, 1997 (62 FR 11158), had been requested by the 
above-named individual. The requested amendment has been issued under 
the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended 
(16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the Regulations Governing the Taking and 
Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), the Endangered Species 
Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the 
Regulations Governing the Taking, Importing, and Exporting of 
Endangered Fish and Wildlife (50 CFR part 222).
    Issuance of this amendment, as required by the ESA, was based on a 
finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for in good faith; (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is the 
subject of this permit; and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: June 10, 1998.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 98-15994 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief financial officer of
Microvision, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)     the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:November 7, 2008 | By: /s/ Jeff T. Wilson   Jeff T. Wilson
 Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------

---