alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 199

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the one-time exclusion

on gain from sale of a principal residence to be taken before age 55

if the taxpayer or a family member suffers a catastrophic illness.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the

one-time exclusion on gain from sale of a principal residence to be taken before age 55 if the taxpayer or

a family member suffers a catastrophic illness.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION ON GAIN FROM HOME SALE TO

4 APPLY IF TAXPAYER OR FAMILY MEMBER

5 SUFFERS CATASTROPHIC ILLNESS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 121(a)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to one8 time exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence by
2

•S 199 IS

1 individual who has attained age 55) is amended to read

2 as follows:

3 ‘‘(1) either—

4 ‘‘(A) the taxpayer has attained the age of

5 55 before the date of such sale or exchange, or

6 ‘‘(B) as of the date of such sale or ex7 change, the taxpayer, or a parent, spouse, or

8 child of the taxpayer—

9 ‘‘(i) is physically or mentally incapable

10 of self-care, and

11 ‘‘(ii) has had such condition, or has

12 been certified by a medical practitioner li13 censed under State law as expecting to

14 have such condition, for a period of at

15 least 6 months, and’’.

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

17 (1) Paragraph (1) of section 121(d) of the In18 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by insert19 ing ‘‘or condition’’ after ‘‘age’’ each place it appears.

20 (2)(A) The heading for section 121 of such

21 Code is amended by striking ‘‘WHO HAS ATTAINED

22 AGE 55’’ and inserting ‘‘IN CERTAIN CASES’’.

23 (B) The item relating to section 121 in the

24 table of sections for part III of subchapter B of

25 chapter 1 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘who
3

•S 199 IS

1 has attained age 55’’ and inserting ‘‘in certain

2 cases’’.

3 (3) Each of the following provisions of such

4 Code are amended by striking ‘‘who has attained age

5 55’’ and inserting ‘‘in certain cases’’:

6 (A) Section 1033(h)(3).

7 (B) Section 1034(l).

8 (C) Section 1038(e)(1)(A).

9 (D) Section 1250(d)(7)(B).

10 (E) Section 6012(c).

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

12 this section shall apply to sales or exchanges after the date

13 of the enactment of this Act in taxable years ending after

14 such date.

Æ
EXHIBIT 10.8.1


                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") is entered into
this 2nd day of December, 1997 by and between Specialty Care Network, Inc.
("SCN") and David Hicks ("Executive").

     WHEREAS, Executive entered into an Employment Agreement, effective as of
March 1, 1998, with SCN pursuant to which Executive agreed to devote full time
to the business of the Company and to serve as a member of SCN's senior
management;

     WHEREAS, Executive and SCN acknowledge and agree that it is in the best
interest of the parties to describe more accurately the duties and reporting
relationships in view of the organizational structure at SCN.

     NOW, THEREFORE, AND INTENDING TO BE LEGALLY BOUND HEREBY, the parties
hereby agree as follows:

     1. Section 2.2 of the aforementioned Employment Agreement is hereby amended
to state as follows:

     Duties. During the Term of the Employment Agreement, the Executive shall
     devote substantially all of his time and attention and best efforts to the
     Company's affairs. Specifically, the Executive shall have authority and
     responsibility, commensurate with and customary for the person holding the
     office and position for which the Executive has contracted in the
     Employment Agreement, with respect to the day to day operations and long
     term management of the Company, as well as implementation of the long range
     growth strategy of the Company, consistent with directions from the Board
     of Directors or the Chief Executive Officer. The Executive acknowledges
     that his title and position, as well as his actual responsibilities, may be
     modified by the Company to reflect changes in the nature, scope and
     direction of the Company's business, provided that such modifications shall
     not substantially diminish Executive's level of responsibilities or stature
     within the Company. The Executive acknowledges and agrees further that all
     references herein to the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer
     include those senior members of management who are delegated the
     responsibility for overseeing Executive's performance of his job
     responsibilities.



<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the
date first above written.

                                           SPECIALTY CARE NETWORK, INC.



                                           /s/ Kerry R. Hicks
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           BY: KERRY R. HICKS
                                               Chief Executive Officer



                                           EXECUTIVE



                                           /s/ David Hicks
                                           ------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roberto Gonzalez, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 125]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), entered on or about December 19, 2013, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s claim that the court erred in certifying him as a sex offender on his underlying conviction of second-degree unlawful surveillance (a crime for which sex offender registration is not automatic) is not reviewable on this appeal from a risk level determination (see *People v Lema,*157 AD3d 406 [2018] [decided herewith]). Defendant’s failure to challenge his certification on direct appeal of his conviction thus precludes review of his present claim.

In any event, regardless of the issue of reviewability, while defendant agreed to register as a sex offender as a condition of his plea bargain, the plea court expressly and appropriately exercised its discretion in certifying him as a sex offender. Although an exemption from sex offender registration for an unlawful surveillance conviction under Penal Law § 250.45 (3) may be available if “registration would be unduly harsh and inappropriate” (Correction Law § 168-a [2] [e]), defendant has not made such a showing, particularly given the circumstances of his crime *(see People v Simmons,*129 AD3d 520 [1st Dept 2015], *lv denied*26 NY3d 903 [2015]). As in *Simmons,*the “circumstances of the surveillance were repulsive, and they raise concerns about defendant’s character and potential for recidivism” *(Simmons,*129 AD3d at 521).

The court properly assessed 15 points under the risk factor for drug or alcohol abuse. Defendant’s admissions to corrections officials of his extensive history of substance abuse provided clear and convincing evidence of such abuse, thus satisfying the standard set forth in *People v Palmer*(20 NY3d 373, 378-379 [2013]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure (see *People v Gillotti,*23 NY3d *410841 [2014]). There were no mitigating factors that were not adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, and the record does not establish any basis for a departure.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
No. 09-10911.

#### Abdelhamid Sedrati, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 961, 131 S. Ct. 455,

178 L. Ed. 2d 286,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8056.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

*287Same case below, 365 Fed. Appx. 30.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          27,951
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          32,075
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    452,575
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        977,166
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,566,927
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,120,746
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,981
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             22,311
<LONG-TERM>                                    331,890
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           680
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,566,927
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,533
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  269
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 6,735
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                25,537
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,313
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,234
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,990
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      120
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,961
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,961
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.31
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.  By: /s/ Gary C. Granoff Gary C. Granoff Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
May 15, 2009
No. 10-5491.

#### John Vega, Petitioner v. New York.

562 U.S. 925, 131 S. Ct. 308,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7485.

178 L. Ed. 2d 200,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, denied.

Same case below, 68 App. Div. 3d 665, 892 N.Y.S.2d 355.
No. D-2543.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Mitchell Eric Fox.

562 U.S. 814, 131 S. Ct. 406,

178 L. Ed. 2d 270,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7520.

October 4, 2010.

Mitchell Eric Fox, of Plantation, Florida, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis J. Allingham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By        /s/ DENNIS J. ALLINGHAM
  -------------------------------------------
Dennis J. Allingham
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
September 20, 2002
# C_2014303EN.01000202.xml

| 8.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/2

---

Appeal brought on 17 December 2013 by Zoo Sport Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 16 October 2013 in Case T-453/12: Zoo Sport Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and intervener before the General Court K-2 Corp.

(Case C-676/13 P)

2014/C 303/03

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Zoo Sport Ltd (represented by: I. Rungg, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and K-2 Corp.

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 15 July 2014 the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
No. 10-5190.

#### Lloyd Lee Askins, III, Petitioner v. Nevada, et al.

562 U.S. 908, 131 S. Ct. 256,

178 L. Ed. 2d 170,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6827.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raybon C., Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 524]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Marc J. Whiten, J.), rendered September 10, 2015, unanimously affirmed.

Although we find that defendant did not make a valid waiver of the right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur—Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN 

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT: TEST PROCEDURES FOR 

METAL HALIDE BALLASTS 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW. 

Washington, DC 20585 

Friday, December 19, 2008 

9 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. ET, Room 8E-089 

Purpose 

During this meeting the Department of Energy (DOE) will present the notice of proposed 

rulemaking on test procedures for Metal Halide Light Fixtures for ballast efficiency and standby 

mode and off mode power consumption. This meeting is intended to familiarize interested 

stakeholders with DOE’s statutory requirements and proposed test procedures. 

Agenda 

9:00-9:05 am Welcome 

Linda Graves 

9:05-9:15 am Opening Remarks, Introductions, and Agenda Review 

Doug Brookman 

9:15-9:30 am Stakeholder Opening Statements 

Doug Brookman 

9:30-10:20 am Statute and Context 

Michael Myer

Overview of product rulemaking activity, including statutory authority, schedules, and associated 

documents 

10:20-11:00 am Proposed Ballast Efficiency Test Method: Test Setup and Conditions, Test 

Measurement, and Ballast Efficiency Calculation

Michael Myer

Definition of covered products, lamp orientation, power supply, ambient test temperature, test 

instrumentation and lamp stabilization requirements based on ANSI Standard C82.6-2005 

11:00-11:15 am Break 

11:15-12:00 pm Proposed Standby and Off Mode Test Method 

Michael Myer

Definition of active, standby, and off modes; review of testing methods based on using ANSI 

Standard C82.6-2005 testing procedures 

12:15-12:30 pm Conclusions and Closing Remarks 

Linda Graves/Doug Brookman 

Discuss outstanding issues and make concluding remarks 

12:30 pm Adjourn

EERE-2008-BT-TP-0017 COMMENT 09
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Loudeye Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence J. Madden, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

            1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the date of the financial statements contained therein.

/s/ Lawrence J. Madden
----------------------
Lawrence J. Madden
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
October 7, 2004
#### Com. v. Reel 26

04/06/2016

21 EAL (2016)

26

. Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied
No. 10-5618.

#### Jefferson Watson, Petitioner v. Georgia.

562 U.S. 932, 131 S. Ct. 328,

178 L. Ed. 2d 213,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7482.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.

Same case below, 302 Ga. App. 619, 691 S.E.2d 378.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Amy Rodriguez, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 432]

An appeal having *478been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard M. Weinberg, J.), rendered May 12, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Kapnick, Webber and Oing, JJ.
No. 10-6384.

#### Jeffrey Welker, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 975, 131 S. Ct. 495,

178 L. Ed. 2d 313,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7912.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 534.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

HAROLD W. VAN ALLEN,

Claimant

- Appellant,

v.

Eric K. S hinseki , SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee.

______________________

2013

- 7057

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for

Veterans Claims in No. 12

- 2957, Judge William A. Moo rman.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Harold W. V an Allen moves for an extension of time, until August 15, 2013, to pay the filing fee or submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof

,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : Case: 13-7057 Document: 20 Page: 1 Filed: 08/05/2013HAROLD VAN ALLEN v. SHINSEKI 2

The motion is granted to the extent that the filing fee

or a “Motion and Declaration for leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis” is due August 15, 2013. No further

extensions should be anticipated. If the filing fee is not paid or the in Forma Pauperis motion is not filed by August 15, 2013 , the motion to reinstate th e appeal filed on May 13, 2013 will be denied.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel O’Toole

Clerk

s2 1 Case: 13-7057 Document: 20 Page: 2 Filed: 08/05/2013
2017-0614.

#### State ex rel. Kanter v. Cleveland Hts.

On appellee’s motion to strike notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction. Motion denied. Appellee may file a memorandum in response within 30 days.
# DSCC celebrates Arbor Day at MWR Sports Park

/ Published May 14, 2024
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
As part of an ongoing effort to further develop Defense Supply Center Columbus’ urban forest under the Tree City USA program, 24 larger caliper native trees were installed at the DSCC Morale, Recreation and Welfare Sports Park by Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management - Columbus personnel.

The trees were dedicated during the annual DSCC Arbor Day Celebration May 8 with a reading of the 2024 Arbor Day Proclamation by DLA Installation Management – Columbus Site Director Kristine Freels and a brief discussion on the importance of the Tree City USA program.

“Our main goal is to continue growing the urban forest by planting native trees along the walkway here [at the DSCC MWR Sports Park] as well as provide some shade around the track and also just generally beautify this space,” said Nicole Goicochea, physical scientist for the DSCC Environmental Division.

The trees were selected by Goicochea and Central Ohio Regional Urban Forester Alistair Reynolds of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry. Ten redbuds, eight tulip trees, two chokecherry and four serviceberry were planted earlier this spring.

According to the Arbor Day Foundation, trees provide many benefits to a community when properly planted and maintained. In addition to improving neighborhood aesthetics, trees generally increase property values, reduce cooling costs, reduce air pollution, and provide natural habitat for a variety of wildlife.
#### Com. v. Smith 28

04/12/2016

825, 826 MAL (2015)

28

. Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 467