alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Michele S., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Yi S., Appellant; Administration For Children’s Services of the City of New York, Respondent.

[67 NYS3d 628]

*552Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about January 19, 2017, to the extent it brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about October 12, 2016, which found that respondent mother neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence supports the finding that the mother neglected the child by inflicting excessive corporal punishment by scratching and pinching the child with enough force as to cause bruising and scratch marks that were visible days after the incident *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; *Matter of Naomi J. [Damon R.],*84 AD3d 594 [1st Dept 2011]). The child’s out-of-court statements to ACS caseworkers that the mother physically abused her were sufficiently corroborated by the caseworkers’ testimony as to their own observations of the child’s injuries and the mother’s testimony that she also saw a bruise on the child’s arm (see *Matter of Jazmyn R. [Luceita F.],*67 AD3d 495 [1st Dept 2009]; *Matter of Fred Darryl B.,*41 AD3d 276 [1st Dept 2007]). In addition, the finding that the mother neglected the child by verbally abusing her is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, because the child’s out-of-court statements that the mother would tell her that she wished she had not been born and that it cost too much money to get the child out of foster care was corroborated by the mother’s testimony *(see Matter of Michael M.,*24 AD3d 199, 200 [1st Dept 2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 712 [2006]).

In view of our disposition we need not address the alternative basis for the Family Court’s finding of neglect.

The mother’s challenge to the language in Family Ct Act § 1012 (f) (i) (B), “or by any other acts of a similarly serious nature requiring the aid of the court,” as unconstitutionally vague is unpreserved and without merit (see *Nicholson v Scoppetta,*3 NY3d 357 [2004]).

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Sweeny, Gische, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
# Employee Spotlight: Jason Howell

/ Published Nov. 15, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs.*

**Name:** Jason Howell

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City’s Material Management Division

**Years of service:** 6 years

**What is your job title and what do you do specifically?**I am a material support specialist in the shop service center. I work hand-in-hand with our internal and external customers to better serve the Airforce’s E3 Airborne Warning and Control System Sentry, and the B52 Stratofortress and B1 Lancer bombers.

**What do you like most about your job and why?** What I like most about my job is knowing that I help supply the parts needed to get the aircraft back in the sky for the warfighter.

**What is your fondest memory of working for DLA Aviation?** Some of my memories of working at DLA Aviation took place during our team building events. We’ve gone on excursions such as bowling or out to eat at Swadley’s BBQ restaurant in Midwest City, Oklahoma. No matter the activity, I always have a great time and feels like it brings us closer together, making us better as a team.

**What are your best practices for achieving goals or accomplishing tasks?** What I have found to work when accomplishing tasks and achieving goals has been learning how to communicate with others. This really helps if you’re working as a team.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?**Outside of work I love to spend time with my family. Whether I’m coaching my two son’s basketball teams or fishing, it is done as a family.

**What is your favorite military aircraft?  Why?**One of my favorite planes would have to be the E3 AWACS. I grew up next to Tinker Air Force base, in Del City, Oklahoma, and I would see them flying around our house. I thought they were unique with the disc on top and I been fascinated with them ever since.

**Have you had a mentor that helped you grow in your career?  If so who, and how did they help?** While working at DLA, I met Shaun Brown, a supervisory distribution facilities specialist in my division. He’s a great mentor who has been there for me since day one. Shaun is patient when teaching new tasks and if there is something he doesn’t know how to do he’ll find someone to teach us both. He has been a wonderful leader and friend.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on form 10KSB of Diapulse
Corporation of America (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I Jesse
Ross, President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

2.       To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
         Report.


Date: March 31, 2004                      by: /s/ JESSE ROSS
                                          ---------------------
                                          Jesse Ross
                                          President
*March 27, 2017*

2017-Ohio-1085.]

2016-1882.

#### State v. Graham.

Portage C.P. No. 2016 CR 107 E. On appellant’s motion for extension of time to transmit record. Motion granted. The record shall be filed no later than June 21, 2017.
(August 23, 2017)

#### In the Matter of Norma Campusano, Respondent, v Corey Ortega et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent.

[57 NYS3d 890]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered on or about August 11, 2017 unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petition as supplemented by the schedule, filed and served on respondent on the return date of the order to show cause, gave detailed and timely notice of the specific signatures that petitioner was claiming had been erroneously invalidated by the Board of Elections (Election Law § 16-102).

Concur— Gische, J.R, Richter, Kapnick, Webber and Kahn, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-932-1430-01; F-92350]


Public Land Order No. 7336; Extension of Public Land Order No. 
5645 and Transfer of Jurisdiction, Poker Creek Border Station; Alaska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order extends Public Land Order No. 5645, which withdrew 
approximately 10 acres of public land from surface entry and mining for 
protection of the Poker Creek Border Station for an additional 20 year 
period, and transfers administrative jurisdiction from the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Customs, to the General Services 
Administration. The land will be administered by the General Services 
Administration, and used jointly with the Bureau of Customs and the 
Immigration and Naturalization Service as a border inspection station 
to aid in the enforcement of the Customs and Immigration laws.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 19, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robbie J. Havens, Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 W. 7th Avenue, No. 13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599, 907-271-5049.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1994), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Public Land Order No. 5645 (43 FR 31006, July 19, 1978), which 
withdrew 10 acres of public land from settlement, sale, location, or 
entry under the general land laws, including the United States mining 
laws (30 U.S.C. Ch. 2 (1994)), is hereby extended for an additional 20-
year period.
    2. Administrative jurisdiction over the land, as described in 
Public Land Order No. 5645, is hereby transferred from the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Customs, to the General Services 
Administration.
    3. This withdrawal will expire 20 years from the effective date of 
this order unless, as a result of a review conducted before the 
expiration date pursuant to Section 204(f) of the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(f) (1994), the Secretary 
determines that the withdrawal shall be extended.

    Dated: May 14, 1998.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 98-14789 Filed 6-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Elizabeth A. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/  Elizabeth A. Murphy
------------------------
Elizabeth A. Murphy
Chief Financial Officer
January 31, 2005

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re
Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33368]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2232-356]


Duke Energy Corporation; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

June 12, 1998.
    An Environmental Assessment (EA) is available for public review. 
The EA was prepared for an application filed on November 17, 1997, by 
the Duke Energy Corporation, licensee for the Catawba-Wateree 
Hydroelectric Project located in North Carolina and South Carolina. In 
its application, the licensee requests that the Commission allow 
Harborside Development, LLC., to excavate an approximately 0.64 acre 
area of lake bottom and to stabilize 295 feet of shoreline on Lake 
Norman.
    The EA finds that the proposed action would not be a major federal 
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the EA can be obtained 
by calling the Commission's public reference room at (202) 208-1371.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16187 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 10-5173.

#### Cyrus Y. Kim, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 907, 131 S. Ct. 254,

178 L. Ed. 2d 168,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6904,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-1416.

#### Charles D. Gianetti, Petitioner v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Connecticut, et al.

562 U.S. 947, 131 S. Ct. 121,

178 L. Ed. 2d 242,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7766.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 351 Fed. Appx. 520.
Exhibit 99.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Elizabeth A. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Scott E. Willkomm


Scott E. Willkomm
President
August 7, 2002
No. 10-5174.

#### Michael Morgan, Petitioner v. Kathy Minger.

562 U.S. 907, 131 S. Ct. 254,

178 L. Ed. 2d 168,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7352.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 53.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40591

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODRIGO ANDRES BERNAL-ESTEVEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-1658-1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Rodrigo Andres BernalEstevez raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. 

Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge 

of drug type and quantity is not an element under 21 U.S.C. § 841. Knowledge 

of drug type and quantity also is not an element of the offense under the related 

statutes of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and § 960. United States v. Restrepo-Granda, 575 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40591 Document: 00512597428 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
No. 13-40591

F.2d 524, 527 (5th Cir. 1978); see United States v. Valencia-Gonzales, 172 F.3d 

344, 345-46 (5th Cir. 1999). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition 

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-40591 Document: 00512597428 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
of the Exchange Act

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:



|By: |  | /s/DAVID W. MONTGOMERYDavid W. Montgomery
Chief Financial Officer | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    |  | Date: November 14, 2003                                           | 

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1****Certifications Under Section 906**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of AMICAS,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,that:     The Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Stephen N. Kahane, M.D., M.S. March 17, 2008     Stephen N. Kahane, M.D., M.S. Date  Chief Executive Officer         /s/ Joseph D. Hill March 17, 2008     Joseph D. Hill Date  Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
# DLA Takes Action: LTG Simerly Addresses Culture Survey Feedback

/ Published May 14, 2024
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
People and culture are priorities for Defense Logistics Agency Director Army Lt. Gen Mark T. Simerly. Further strengthened with data from last year’s DLA Culture Survey and Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, Simerly aims to address next steps and plan a course of action.

02:21VIDEO  | 02:21 |DLA 2023 Culture & Climate Survey Results -- We Hear You (open caption)

In his message, Simerly appreciates the time employees take to voice their experiences, concerns, and ideas for shaping the culture at DLA. He also outlines the steps leaders are taking to address employee feedback and make the agency a better place to work.

“I’ve directed each commander and director to initiate targeted action planning, involving comprehensive focus group discussions and listening sessions,” he states in the video.

Together, these action plans will give DLA leaders insights into understanding the root causes underlying employees’ perspectives and providing support where it’s needed most.

Simerly ended his message to the workforce with a call to embark on this journey together with confidence. “I'm here to serve with you, to grow with you, and to celebrate our achievements along the way,” he said.
----

Exhibit 3.5

STATE OF DELAWARECERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OFCERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

LOUDEYE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

The undersigned, Meena Kang Latta, hereby certifies:- She is the duly elected and acting Vice President and Secretary of    Loudeye Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation. 
- The Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation was originally    filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on March 26, 1998. 
- Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State    of Delaware, this Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation amends Article    I of this corporations Certificate of Incorporation to read in its entirety as follows: 

"The name of the corporation is Loudeye Corp." 
- The foregoing Certificate of Amendment has been duly adopted by this    corporation's Board of Directors and stockholders in accordance with the applicable    provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of    Delaware. 

Executed at Seattle, WA, on May 29, 2002

                                                                    
/s/  Meena Kang LattaMeena Kang LattaVice President, and Secretary
# C_2015398EN.01003301.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Accorinti and Others v ECB

(Case T-79/13) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - ECB - National central banks - Restructuring of Greek public debt - Programme for purchasing securities - Securities exchange agreement for the sole benefit of central banks in the Eurosystem - Private sector involvement - Collective action clauses - Credit enhancement in the form of a buyback programme intended to support the quality of the securities as collateral - Private creditors - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Legitimate expectations - Equal treatment - Liability for a lawful legislative measure - Unusual and special damage))

(2015/C 398/42)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alessandro Accorinti (Nichelino, Italy) and 214 other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex to the judgment (represented by: S. Sutti, R. Spelta and G. Sanna, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: initially S. Bening and P. Papapaschalis, then P. Senkovic and P. Papapaschalis, and finally P. Senkovic, acting as Agents, and by E. Castellani, B. Kaiser and T. Lübbig, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for damages for the harm suffered by the applicants as a result of, in particular, the adoption by the ECB of Decision 2012/153/EU of 5 March 2012 on the eligibility of marketable debt instruments issued or fully guaranteed by the Hellenic Republic in the context of the Hellenic Republic’s debt exchange offer (OJ 2012 L 77, p. 19) and of other decisions of the European Central Bank taken in the context of the restructuring of Greek debt.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Mr Alessandro Accorinti and the other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Mr Alessandro Accorinti and the other applicants whose names are listed in the Annex to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.

1

---