alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


                  CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Leonard F. Leganza,
the Chief Executive Officer of The Eastern Company (the "Company") and John L.
Sullivan III, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that,
to the best of their knowledge:

1)   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 30,
     2006, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the
     "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2)   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 19th
day of March, 2007.

                                         /s/Leonard F. Leganza
                                         ---------------------
                                         Leonard F. Leganza
                                         CEO


                                         /s/John L. Sullivan III
                                         -----------------------
                                         John L. Sullivan III
                                         CFO


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Eastern Company and will be retained by The Eastern Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification "accompanies" the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.)




                                      -67-
#### Com. v. Straughters

05/10/2016

33 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1026
No. 09-11325.

#### Erik Earhart, Petitioner v. Khelleh Konteh, Warden.

562 U.S. 874, 131 S. Ct. 178,

178 L. Ed. 2d 107,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6636,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 589 F.3d 337.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1612]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3041]


Northern Mariana Islands; Amendment #1

    In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency dated January 2, 1998, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
on December 16, 1997 and continuing through December 17, 1997.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is February 26, 1998 and for 
economic injury the termination date is September 24, 1998.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: January 9, 1998.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-1612 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2482 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2482

 To provide for the restoration of Washington Square in Philadelphia, 
    Pennsylvania, and for the inclusion of Washington Square within 
     Independence National Historical Park, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

  Mr. Wofford introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the restoration of Washington Square in Philadelphia, 
    Pennsylvania, and for the inclusion of Washington Square within 
     Independence National Historical Park, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF WASHINGTON SQUARE.

    (a) Restoration.--The Secretary of the Interior (acting through the 
Director of the National Park Service) may provide a grant to 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to undertake the restoration of the area 
known as Washington Square, as depicted on the map numbered ____, and 
dated ____. Such grant may not be used to fund more than 66.6 percent 
of the costs of such restoration. The grant shall be conditioned on the 
conduct of such restoration in accordance with such standards as may be 
established by the Secretary in order to facilitate the inclusion of 
the square in Independence National Historical Park pursuant to section 
2 of this Act.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for the purposes of this section not more than $2,600,000 
for the fiscal year 1995.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION WITHIN INDEPENDENCE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    Upon completion of the restoration, pursuant to section 1, of 
Washington Square (as depicted on the map referred to in section 1), 
the Secretary of the Interior may--
            (1) enter into an agreement with Philadelphia, 
        Pennsylvania, for the lease of the area to the National Park 
        Service; and
            (2) modify the boundaries of Independence National 
        Historical Park to include such area within such boundaries and 
        to provide for the administration of such area as part of such 
        Park.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Jennifer L., Appellant, v Gerald S., Jr., Respondent. In the Matter of Gerald S., Jr., Respondent, v Jennifer L., Appellant. In the Matter of Melinda L.-B., Respondent, v Gerald S., Jr., Appellant, and Jennifer L., Respondent. (And Another Action.)

Submitted February 14, 2017;

decided March 30, 2017

Reported below, 145 AD3d 1581.

*943Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 23.1


                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We have issued our report dated July 31, 1998, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended June
30, 1998.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in
the Registration Statements of Lifecore Biomedical, Inc. and subsidiaries on
Forms S-8 (File No. 33-19288, effective December 23, 1987; File No. 33-26065,
effective February 18, 1988; File No. 33-32984, effective January 12, 1990; File
No. 33-38914, effective February 8, 1991, File No. 33-38914, effective September
26, 1994 and File No. 333-18515, effective December 20, 1996) and Form S-3 (File
No. 333-60987, effective August 21, 1998).


                                                  /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 25, 1998
. . 

Dote! June 17. 201~ 

--~~ttenMaterials?Yes!Nu,_· ----------:}{0~ "Q-;LL ~ t - · . -~- ~--{; \.- {)1\. ~v{ \ Name Organization Phon Number L .. 

--~- --~--~~-------~----~' uvnA•~ Et · 2oL )6? 7c ~ 

~P A: ___ __ _____ --~k~ ~i-{-,-CZ0~q . eP4 I 0( ()d - 3 .) - 9 (_! {a_J 

$S?2 LJ ~S" 7; Db
# Former DLA Troop Support commander garners Hall of Fame induction

/ Published June 15, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
*Editor’s note: This is the fourth of nine stories featuring 2020 DLA Hall of Fame inductees. A video highlighting inductees’ contributions to the agency will be broadcast on DLA’s Facebook page June 23.*

As former commander of the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia, now Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, retired Army Lt. Gen. Raymond Mason managed four supply chains, reduced cost recovery rates and decreased logistics response times by over 50%, thereby saving the agency almost $20 million. These and other accomplishments have earned Mason a spot in the 2020 DLA Hall of Fame.  

Mason, who served as commander from September 2003 to September 2005, helped implement Business Systems Modernization and managed reorganization of DLA Troop Support’s supply chains to focus on two aspects: customer needs and the industrial base. 

Under Mason’s leadership, the organization established forward-positioned supply chains to ensure critical items were ready when customers needed them. He also expanded prime vendor programs worldwide, including remote locations like Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Robert Ratner, who served as Mason’s chief of staff and assembled the nomination packet, said Mason’s tenure was marked by “unsurpassed commitment to the warfighter.”

“While the improvements [Mason] made in our collective performance metrics speak for themselves, it was his leadership and managerial skills that truly set him apart,” Ratner said. “But amazingly, they paled in comparison to the size of his heart and compassion for those around him. He brought out the very best in people; in my opinion, there is no greater legacy.”*Editor's note: View Mason's segment of the 2020 DLA Hall of Fame ceremony video from June 23:*
No. 10-5948.

#### Lisa Strickland, Petitioner v. Saint Luke’s Health System.

562 U.S. 984, 131 S. Ct. 419,

178 L. Ed. 2d 327,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8280.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 569.
# Years of service ceremony honors local national employees

/ Published Dec. 19, 2023
RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany , 
Local national employees from Defense Logistics Agency Europe & Africa, U.S. Air Forces Europe and Africa and the Defense Commissary Agency received recognition for their years in service in a ceremony hosted by the 86th Force Support Squadron at the Officers Club on Ramstein Air Base Dec. 7.

86th Airlift Wing Commanding General Air Force Brig. Gen. Otis C. Jones and Command Chief Master Sgt. Louis J. Ludwig recognized four DLA Europe & Africa local national employees: Andrea Quaiser, Nathalie Iyabi, Hauke Dins and Heike Neimann.

Quaiser from DLA Information Operations Europe & Africa and Iyabi from DLA Energy Europe & Africa marked 20 years of dedicated service. Dins of DLA Energy Europe & Africa commemorated a 30-year milestone. Neimann with DLA Troop Support Europe & Africa was honored for her 40 years of service, most of which has been with DLA.

“Frau Neumann plays a critical role in DLA Europe & Africa as the president of the Kaiserslautern Military Community Works Council, as well as her years of outstanding support to the DLA Troop Support mission as a procurement analyst,” said DLA Europe & Africa Deputy Commander Don Bruce. “Frau Neumann is known by many businesses, fellow contracting shops, and employees of all region [major subordinate commands] as an outstanding, helpful, customer-focused employee.”
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2031

To amend the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, to prohibit the imposition of

additional charges or fees for attendance at the United States Merchant

Marine Academy, and to express the sense of the Senate that no additional charges or fees shall be imposed for attendance at the United

States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, the United

States Air Force Academy, and the United States Coast Guard Academy,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 19 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Mr. D’AMATO (for himself, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. COCHRAN, and

Mr. DURENBERGER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, to prohibit the

imposition of additional charges or fees for attendance

at the United States Merchant Marine Academy, and

to express the sense of the Senate that no additional

charges or fees shall be imposed for attendance at the

United States Military Academy, the United States

Naval Academy, the United States Air Force Academy,

and the United States Coast Guard Academy, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 2031 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Merchant Marine

3 Academy Reform Act of 1994’’.

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL

5 CHARGES OR FEES FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE

6 ACADEMY ATTENDANCE.

7 Section 1303 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46

8 U.S.C. App. 1295b) is amended by adding at the end the

9 following new subsection:

10 ‘‘(j) PROHIBITION ON FEES AND CHARGES FOR AT11 TENDANCE BY UNITED STATES CITIZENS AT THE MER12 CHANT MARINE ACADEMY.—

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para14 graph (2), no tuition or charge for room or board

15 may be imposed in connection with attendance at

16 the Merchant Marine Academy by an individual se17 lected for attendance pursuant to subsection (b).

18 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition specified in

19 paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to any

20 item or service provided to midshipmen at the Mer21 chant Marine Academy for which a charge is im22 posed on the date of enactment of the Merchant Ma23 rine Academy Reform Act of 1994.

24 ‘‘(3) CHANGE IN APPLICABLE FEE.—The Sec25 retary of Transportation shall notify Congress of

26 any change made in the amount of a charge exempt-
3

•S 2031 IS

1 ed by paragraph (2) from the prohibition in para2 graph (1).’’.

3 SEC. 3. SENSE OF SENATE.

4 It is the sense of the Senate that no charges or fees

5 should be imposed for attendance at the United States

6 Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, the

7 United States Air Force Academy, or the United States

8 Coast Guard Academy.

Æ
No. 10-5936.

#### Kelroy Williamson, Petitioner v. Maryland.

562 U.S. 984, 131 S. Ct. 419,

178 L. Ed. 2d 327,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8288.

October 18, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.

Same case below, 413 Md. 521, 993 A.2d 626.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 28, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-28-1999
<CASH>                                             298,582
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,797,401
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,241,677
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,405,375
<PP&E>                                          69,180,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,576,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,030,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,731,362
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           392,732
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,136,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,030,171
<SALES>                                        181,980,204
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,980,204
<CGS>                                          112,565,940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,565,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,917,305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,528,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,241,175)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21,728
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,241,175)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,262,903)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.15)



</TABLE>
June 26, 2015 

Mr. David Twining 

Chief Operating Officer 

Planck Aerosystems Inc. 

3106 Maple Street 

San Diego, CA 92014 

Dear Mr. Twining: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 45.23, 45.27, 45.29, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.405, 91.407, 91.409, 91.417, and part 21 

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your April 21, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Planck Aerosystems Inc. into 

the public docket (No. FAA−2015−1479), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       [KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP LETTERHEAD]



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Claremont Technology Group, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 
33-336701) on Form S-4 and in the registration statements (Nos. 33-358205 and 
33-358209) of Complete Business Solutions, Inc. of our report dated August 14, 
1997, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Claremont Technology 
Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997 and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the 
years in the two-year period ended June 30, 1997, which report appears in the 
Form 10-K of Complete Business Solutions, Inc. dated on or about March 25, 1999.

                                                           KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



Portland, Oregon
March 25, 1999
# CATC Camp Fuji Fuels System Upgrades

/ Published March 20, 2024
SHIZUOKA, Japan, 
Dozens of members of the Combined Arms Training Center, Camp Fuji community braved the cold to receive training on how to use the newly upgraded fuels payment system, March 7, 2024.

The Defense Logistics Agency has replaced the fuels payment systems around the world for the Department of Defense.

“DLA wanted something more secure,” Tim Throckmorton, a Gasboy field engineer. “These [systems] use a secure modem that talks directly to [local databases].”

There are a few notable changes with the new system.

The key and key-reader have been replaced with a scanning device and QR code.

A new additional step to the fueling process involves the use of Common Access Cards, U.S. and military drivers’ licenses, and names.“With our new system people are scanning their CACs now, after they scan the QR code,” said Lance Cpl. Casey Malcolm, an alternate fuels accountant.

If a person doesn’t have a CAC or driver’s license to scan, the Gasboy system allows them to enter their name.

"We can actually see who’s getting fuel,” Malcolm said. “We can see who’s using fuel more than other sections, which is cool.”

The Gasboy system also processes data faster than the previous fuels payment system.

“With our old system, we would have to download every single transaction from the previous day and then we would upload them to our system, said Malcom, who is originally from Foley, Alabama. “This new system sends information directly to us within 15-minutes, so it eliminates all the steps we had to do for reports.”

If you missed the training classes, information about how to use the QR Code system is available at every fuel kiosk.
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts-Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and to the use of our
report dated December 7, 2004 in the Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement (File No. 333-120517) and related Prospectus of Claymore Securities
Defined Portfolios, Series 201.


                                              /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
                                              ------------------------
                                              GRANT THORNTON LLP


Chicago, Illinois
December 7, 2004
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
 LaserCard Corporation:

        We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (No. 333-112172) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-122840, 333-122841, 333-113690, 333-89473, 333-23091, 333-39493, 333-54018,
333-54026, and 333-71548) of LaserCard Corporation (formerly Drexler Technology
Corporation) and subsidiaries of our report dated June 9, 2004, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of LaserCard Corporation and subsidiaries as of March
31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and our report on financial
statement schedule dated June 9, 2004, which reports appear in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
June 14, 2005



                                      108