alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013336EN.01003103.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/31

---

Action brought on 13 September 2013 — ZZ v Parliament

(Case F-86/13)

2013/C 336/70

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: P. Bentley QC, Barrister, and R. Bäuerle, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision prohibiting the applicant from taking up an appointment as an adviser to the Prime Minister of Ukraine within two years as from the date of termination of his functions with the European Parliament.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the Parliament's decision dated 3 January 2013 forbidding the Applicant from undertaking an appointment as Adviser to Prime Minister of Ukraine, for two years following the termination of his employment with the Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Parliament's decision dated 3 January 2013 forbidding the Applicant from undertaking an appointment as Adviser to Prime Minister of Ukraine, for two years following the termination of his employment with the Parliament;

| — | annul the Parliament's decision dated 24 June 2013 rejecting the Complaint filed by the Applicant against the Parliament's decision of 3 January 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Parliament's decision dated 24 June 2013 rejecting the Complaint filed by the Applicant against the Parliament's decision of 3 January 2013;

| — | order the Parliament to bear the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Parliament to bear the costs of the present proceedings.

---
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 15 / Friday, January 23, 1998 / Notices 3617

1A copy of this list may be obtained by

contacting Ms. Lorie Nierenberg, Assistant General

Counsel, at 202/619–6084, and the address is Room

700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 Fourth Street,

SW., Washington, DC 20547–0001.

respondents are required to respond

only one time, including the time for

reviewing instructions, searching

existing data sources, gathering and

maintaining the date needed, and

completing and reviewing the collection

of information. Send comments

regarding this burden estimate or any

other aspect of this collection of

information, including suggestions for

reducing the burden, to the United

States Information Agency, M/AOL, 301

Fourth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C.

20547; and to the Office of Information

and Regulatory Affairs, Office of

Management and Budget, New

Executive Office Building, Docket

Library, Room 10202, NEOB,

Washington, D.C. 20503.

Current Actions

This information collection has been

submitted to OMB for the purpose of

requesting reinstatement for a three-year

period and approval of revisions

regarding the total annual burden hours.

Title: ‘‘Applications for

Administrative and Teaching

Exchanges/Seminars Abroad’’.

Form Number: IAP–92.

Abstract: To be used by applicants

under the Fulbright Teacher Exchange

Program which provides opportunities

for U.S. Teachers to exchange positions

for designated periods with foreign

counterparts, or to attend one of a

number of short-term seminars abroad

on a variety of topics.

Proposed Frequency of Responses:

No. of Respondents—940

Recordkeeping House—2.0

Total Annual Burden—1880

Dated: January 16, 1998.

Rose Royal,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 98–1606 Filed 1–22–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8230–01–M

UNITED STATES INFORMATION

AGENCY

Culturally Significant Objects Imported

for Exhibition Determinations

Notice is hereby given of the

following determinations: Pursuant to

the authority vested in me by the Act of

October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C.

2459), Executive Order 12047 of March

27, 1978 (43 FR 13359, March 29, 1978),

and Delegation Order No. 85–5 of June

27, 1985 (50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I

hereby determine that the objects to be

included in the exhibit ‘‘Augustin

Pajou, Royal Sculptor’’ (see list),1

imported from abroad for the temporary

exhibition without profit within the

United States, are of cultural

significance. These objects are imported

pursuant to loan agreements with the

foreign lenders. I also determine that the

exhibition or display of the listed

exhibit objects at The Metropolitan

Museum of Art, New York, New York,

from on or about February 23, 1998, to

on or about May 24, 1998, is in the

national interest. Public Notice of these

determinations is ordered to be

published in the Federal Register.

Dated: January 20, 1998.

Les Jin,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 98–1605 Filed 1–22–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8230–01–M
#### Patterson v. Shelton

04/27/2016

018 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 127 A.3d 894
# CSM O’Neal visits DLA Land and Maritime

/ Published July 5, 2023
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime leaders and staff hosted the agency’s senior enlisted leader, Army Command Sgt. Maj. Tomeka O’Neal at Defense Supply Center Columbus June 21.

O’Neal serves as an advocate for service members at DLA Headquarters and its six major subordinate commands. The visit offered O’Neal the chance to collaborate one-on-one with DLA Land and Maritime leadership as well as to hear from the command’s military cadre.

“I just wanted to come here to say thank you,” said O’Neal, addressing service members at a military all-hands lunch event at the Operations Center. “Thank you for what you do daily to support the national operations of this nation and our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines and Guardians that are out there in harm’s way.”

O’Neal hosted a robust, candid discussion with DLA Land and Maritime’s military team about concerns impacting service members assigned to DLA Land and Maritime and praised their work in moving the agency’s needle forward on warfighter support. 

“Leaders like you are going to take us to 2030,” O’Neal said.

O’Neal said when she first joined the agency in 2020, she associated DLA most closely with the Defense Reutilization Marketing Office – or DRMO – from her time working in an Army supply room early in her career. DRMO, the predecessor to DLA Disposition Services, handled disposal of property that didn’t work anymore or was no longer needed by military units. O’Neal said she didn’t associate her meals, uniforms, supplies, fuel or equipment with DLA. Soon after coming onboard, she made it her mission to learn all she could about DLA to get the whole picture of how the combat logistics agency supports the warfighter.

“The operation that this agency executes is so much larger than disposing of equipment,” she said, adding that the mission, the visibility and the impact it has across the services is immeasurable.

O’Neal noted the criticality of fostering a mutual understanding of what each major subordinate command does and its importance in fulfilling the needs of the services.

“I sit down with all of [the services] and I tell them your story,” she said.

“[DLA] Land and Maritime is much bigger than anyone realizes, with the tanks, the weaponry, the trucks and vehicles it supports,” she added. “People think that DLA Land and Maritime is all about acquisition on the surface which is a fraction of what it really is and its importance for the security of the nation. What they don’t know is beyond acquisition – all the maintenance, the reparables and everything else that we manage on a daily basis.”

O’Neal coined several service members for their hard work at home station and abroad and received a special plaque from DLA Land and Maritime’s military cadre commemorating her visit.

The visit concluded with a base tour by DSCC’s general engineer Anthony Cea, who spoke of the rich history of the installation and how it has changed in mission and physical configuration over the past 100-plus years.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-116637, 333-107795, 333-98545, 333-34522, 333-50605, 333-59075, 333-59077, 333-59079, 333-126725 and 333-146231) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-114069) of American Dental Partners, Inc. of our reportdated March 10, 2008 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts

March 10, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50461

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARTURO OLOVERIG AGLIPAY, JR., also known as June,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:09-CR-151-2

Before DAVIS, SMITH and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Arturo Oloverig Aglipay, Jr., appeals the sentence following his guilty plea

to conspiracy to commit bank fraud. Aglipay argues that the district court

clearly erred in applying the U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) enhancement based on a finding

that he was a manager or organizer of the offense.

The district court’s finding that Aglipay was an organizer, leader,

manager, or supervisor under § 3B1.1(c) is a factual finding reviewed for clear

error. United States v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 560, 584 (5th Cir. 2006). A factual

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 16, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50461 Document: 00511383810 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/16/2011
No. 10-50461

finding not clearly erroneous where it is plausible in light of the record as a

whole. United States v. Cooper, 274 F.3d 230, 238 (5th Cir. 2001).

The record contains evidence of the essential nature of Aglipay’s

participation, the broad scope of the criminal activity, and his recruitment of

Thomas Grant as a coconspirator. Moreover, his coconspirators fingered Aglipay

as the head of the conspiracy, and Aglipay admitted to instructing his

coconspirators how to work the scheme. The record therefore supports a finding

that Aglipay was an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of one or more

other participants. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c), comment. n.(2); Gonzales, 436 F.3d

at 584.

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 10-50461 Document: 00511383810 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/16/2011
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended  September30,  2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Dean E. Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Dean E. Miller
------------------

Dean E. Miller
Chief Financial Officer
November 9, 2006

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to Scottish Re Group  Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re
Group Limited and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2461

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic

Petroleum Reserve more effectively, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. JOHNSTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to manage the Strategic Petroleum Reserve more effectively,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That this Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Policy and

4 Conservation Act Amendments Act of 1994’’.

5 SECTION 101. SHORT TITLE.

6 This title may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Policy and

7 Conservation Act Amendments of 1994’’.

8 SEC. 102. TITLE I AMENDMENTS.

9 Part D of title I of the Energy Policy and Conserva10 tion Act is amended in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251), by
2

S 2461 IS

1 striking ‘‘September 30, 1994’’ each time it appears and

2 inserting ‘‘June 30, 1996’’.

3 SEC. 103. TITLE II AMENDMENTS.

4 Part D of title II of the Energy Policy and Conserva5 tion Act is amended in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285), by

6 striking ‘‘September 30, 1994’’ each time it appears and

7 inserting ‘‘June 30, 1996’’.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer  Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)  of the Exchange Act

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Loggia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

| |  | By: |  | /s/JOSEPH LOGGIAJoseph Loggia
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------

Date: May 14, 2004

---



QuickLinks
DocketNo: FAA-2014-0070 

Directorate ID: 2011-SW-062-AD 

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Disposition Comments 

Next Step: 0FRAN 0SNPRM 

D These comments are in 

response to an SNPRM 

D No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received- If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required. 

No Has the referenced service infonnation been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRMwi/1 require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point.for guidance. 

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by com'rnenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.\C Chapter 9. 

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: compliance time 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): Luc Murphy, Bell Helicopter 

What change to the AD action is requested? The Commenter perceives that the FAA NPRM is more 

stringent for certain inspection requirements than either the MCAI or the OEM ASB 407..:11-95, 

Revision C dated April20, 2012. 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? The perceived more stringent inspection interval 

will impose an additional burden to operators without any additional safety benefits. 

Do we agree? No 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don't agree because The NPRM corrective actions are the same as the MCAI and the 

ASB. However, NPRM, ASB, and MCAI are arranged and worderd differently although the 

mandatory requirements are the same. Consequently, the perception appears to be based on 

the fonnat of the NPR.t\tl. Commenter lists the following differences: 

- - -Strap doublers (but not new longeron) are installed. The commenter states the ASB and 

MCAI allow increasing the inspectio~ interval to 150 hours. Howwever, according to the 

ASB, this is only acceptable providing the longeron and the top skin must be free of defects 

and shall not carry any type of repair. The ASB and the MCAI only address the expanded 

inspection interVal but not specifically address the inspection interval if the longeron or skin 

is not free of defects or carry some type of repair. NPRM (e)(4) states if inspection finds no 

crack in the upper skin and no crack, corrosion, or other damage in the longeron assembly, 

you may install three external strap doublers per the ASB, which allows increasing the 

Page 1 of3 
0 } 

Signature Section 

Signature indicates concurrence with this action. 

ASE PrintedNllme: Sharon Miles Date 

OjJ-tj:l&( 

Date 

Page 3 of3
DLA Installation Management Operations Susquehanna and San Joaquin Police Department team members recognized for excellence at Agency’s 51st award ceremony
 
  By DLA Distrabution, Public Affairs
  Police force team members from DLA’s Installation Management Operations Susquehanna Police Department were recognized for excellence during DLA’s 51st Annual Employee Recognition Awards Program awards ceremony at the McNamara Headquarters Complex on Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Dec. 13.    DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williamspresided over the ceremony and presented individual and team awards, recognizing their exceptional service during the 2018 calendar year.    Officer Joshua Jauga, DLA Susquehanna, was recognized as the DLA Police Officer of the Year.    According to DLA Susquehanna’s Chief of Police, Douglas Schraeder, Jauga demonstrated exemplary performance in all areas of police work and assistance to the DLA community.    “This officer gives more of himself than asked, and often makes sacrifices to the benefit of the greater good, without expectation and acknowledgment,” said Schraeder.    Sergeant Joshua Stokes, of the same unit, was awarded the DLA Lead Police Officer of the Year.    Harold Hokkanen, chief, Security and Emergency Services, DLA Susquehanna, nominated Stoke’s for the award.    “Sergeant Stoke’s duty performance, attention to detail in his ability to plan, resource and execute complex missions, coupled with his dedication and training has set him apart from his peers ... and is truly deserving of selection as the DLA Lead police Officer of the Year 2018,” said Hokkanen.    The DLA Police Unit of the Year award went to DLA Installation Management Operations, San Joaquin, California.    The police department conducted over 538,927 police functions and activities during the year including access control/vehicle searches, alarm response and community support.  Despite working 10 percent under staffed, officer's inspected over 34,500 commercial and visitor vehicles; conducted 100 percent identification checks totaling 530,609 Common Access Cards resulting in 50 entry denials. DLA San Joaquin Police scanned an average 44,217 CAC cards a month and generated nearly 180 police reports. The Police Department had 4,422 non-officer initiated calls for service, of which 318 were emergency responses.    DLA San Joaquin Site Director, Jonathan E. Mathews, praised the unit’s hard work.    “Their outstanding accomplishments are due to the bright, dedicated, professional officers that execute the mission to the highest standards daily,” stated Mathews.
#### Joseph Liporace, Jr., et al., Respondents, v Neimark & Neimark, LLP, et al., Appellants.

[66 NYS3d 435]

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Ban-non, J.), entered July 18, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ motions to dismiss the legal malpractice claim as against them, unanimously modified, on the law, and to grant the motion as to the Neimark defendants, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The Neimark defendants’ failure to serve a timely notice of claim on the New York City Department of Education in the *474underlying action is not the proximate cause of plaintiff’s alleged damages, because the statute of limitations had not yet expired when the Budin defendants were substituted as plaintiffs counsel. This substitution of counsel was a superseding and intervening act that severed any potential liability for legal malpractice on the part of the Neimark defendants *(Pyne v Block & Assoc.,*305 AD2d 213 [1st Dept 2003]).

The complaint sufficiently alleges a claim for legal malpractice against the Budin defendants as plaintiff has sufficiently met the minimum pleading requirements *(see Schwartz v Olshan Grundman Frome & Rosenzweig,*302 AD2d 193, 198 [1st Dept 2003]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Kapnick, Webber and Oing, JJ.
#### Ambac Assurance Corporation et al., Respondents, v Nomura Credit & Capital, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

*445[64 NYS3d 535]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered June 3, 2015, and said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties; and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated by Friedman, J. (2015 NY Slip Op 30930[U]).

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
2017-0612.

#### In re J.R.

Cuyahoga App. No. 105007, 2017-Ohio-1056.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.
No. 10-310.

#### Glen Broemer, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

562 U.S. 964, 131 S. Ct. 482,

178 L. Ed. 2d 292,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7935.

October 12, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5787.

#### Starks Fincher, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 937, 131 S. Ct. 345,

178 L. Ed. 2d 224,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7321.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 374 Fed. Appx. 442.