alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(October 12, 2017)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Valentin, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 479]

Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals for further consideration (29 NY3d 57 [2017]), judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert A. Sackett, J.), rendered September 28, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 20 years, unanimously reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and the matter remanded for a new trial.

*475In his 2015 appeal to this Court, defendant argued, among other things, that the trial court, under the facts of this case, erred by including an initial aggressor instruction in the justification charge *(see*Penal Law § 35.15). A majority of this Court, with one Justice dissenting, agreed, holding that the jury “could not have reasonably found that defendant was the initial aggressor because the evidence does not support such a conclusion” (128 AD3d 428, 428 [1st Dept 2015]). We further held that the error was not harmless, reasoning that “[d]efen-dant’s justification defense presented a close question of whether defendant had a reasonable basis for his use of deadly force, and the charging error could have affected the verdict because the jury might have concluded that defendant was the initial aggressor and, thus, not entitled to a justification defense” *(id.*at 429). Because we reversed the judgment of conviction and remanded the matter for a new trial, we did not address defendant’s contentions that (1) the court erred by failing to instruct the jury that if it acquitted defendant of the count of murder in the second degree based on the justification defense, the jury was not to consider the lesser included offense of manslaughter in the first degree, and (2) the sentence was excessive.

The dissenting Justice granted leave to appeal (2015 NY Slip Op 87471ITJ1), and a majority of the Court of Appeals reversed on the ground that “[i]n the context of [the] self-defense charge, an initial aggressor [charge] was warranted because the charge was requested and there was an issue of fact on the point” (29 NY3d 57, 61 [2017]). The matter was remitted to this Court for consideration of the issues raised but not determined.

Upon remittitur, we find that defendant is entitled to a new trial. As in *People v Kareem*(148 AD3d 550 [1st Dept 2017], *lv dismissed*29 NY3d 1033 [2017]) and *People v Velez*(131 AD3d 129 [1st Dept 2015]), “the court’s jury charge failed to convey that an acquittal on the top count . . . based on a finding of justification would preclude consideration of the remaining charges” *(Kareem,*148 AD3d at 551).

We find that this error was not harmless and warrants reversal in the interest of justice *(see id.).*Because we are ordering a new trial, we decline to reach defendant’s remaining claim that his sentence was excessive.

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00177

- CV
In the Matter of the Marriage of Gloria Ordaz and Dorance Cuba and in the Interest of D.O., D.O., M.O., Children
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. F

- 0034

- 21

- 7

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 2 8 , 2024
No. 10-5235.

#### Ronald Baker, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 910, 131 S. Ct. 262,

178 L. Ed. 2d 173,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6800.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, denied.

Same case below, 33 So. 3d 46.
[Cite as State v. Sizemore , 2018-Ohio-4257.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

CLERMONT COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-05-030

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 10/22/2018 : JENNIFER L. SIZEMORE, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM CLERMONT COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. 2017CR00623

Vincent D. Faris, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, Nicholas A. Horton, 76 South Riverside Drive, 2nd Floor, Batavia, Ohio 45103, for plaintiff-appellee Soumyajit Dutta, 3268 Jefferson Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220, for defendant-appellant

Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Jennifer L. Sizemore, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to discloseClermont CA2018-05-030 any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Gillard, Also Known as Frank Gilliard, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 296]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic R. Mas-*623saro, J.), rendered December 12, 2014, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of nine years, unanimously affirmed.

When, during a lengthy narrative of the events surrounding the robbery, the victim briefly mentioned evidence that had been suppressed, the court properly exercised its discretion *(see People v Ortiz,*54 NY2d 288, 292 [1981]) in denying defendant’s mistrial motion. The court sustained objections to this testimony, and defendant did not request a curative instruction or any relief short of a mistrial *(see People v Young,*48 NY2d 995 [1980]). There is no indication that the prosecutor intentionally elicited the testimony, or acted in bad faith. Furthermore, the suppressed evidence was cumulative to closely related evidence that had not been suppressed.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED) FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 AND CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (394)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,358
<PP&E>                                           8,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,314)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,186
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,352
<SALES>                                         25,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,654
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                       804
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,036
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,036
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 9:17 AM

To: 'sean@swift.aero'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: SWIFT Aero (Docket No. FAA-2015-3278)



### August 17, 2015

Dear Mr. Brown:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-3278). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by August 31, 2015. If we do not receiv e the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
Exhibit 8.1
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 Percentage ofEquity InterestHeld by
    
    Held by
    
    PrincipalName of company
    
    Place of incorporation
    
    the Company
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    ActivitiesMaster Replicas, Inc.
    
    California, United States of America
    
    100%
    
    
    
    
    
    Design, marketing and distribution of movie and television prop replicas.Master Replicas Hong Kong
    
    Hong Kong
    
    
    
    
    
    100%
    
    Product SourcingPopco Distribution Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    100%
    
    
    
    
    
    Distribution of gifts and collectiblesWealthy Holdings Limited
    
    The British Virgin Islands
    
    100%
    
    
    
    InactiveLuen Tat Mould Manufacturing Limited
    
    The British Virgin Islands
    
    100%
    
    
    
    InactiveLuen Tat Mould Design Company Limited
    
    The British Virgin Islands
    
    
    
    100%
    
    InactiveOnchart Industrial Limited
    
    The British Virgin Islands
    
    100%
    
    
    
    InactivePopco Entertainment Holdings LTD
    
    United Kingdom
    
    100%
    
    
    
    Investment holdingPopco Entertainment (UK) LTD
    
    United Kingdom
    
    
    
    100%
    
    Design, marketing and distribution of 
die-cast collectiblesPopCo Entertainment (USA) Inc.
    
    Delaware, United States of America
    
    
    
    100%
    
    Design, marketing and distribution of 
die-cast collectiblesIcon Collectibles Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    
    
    100%
    
    InactiveLledo Collectibles Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    
    
    100%
    
    InactiveBassett Lowke Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    
    
    100%
    
    Inactive




---



##### 



Percentage ofEquity InterestHeld by
    
    Held by
    
    PrincipalName of company
    
    Place of incorporation
    
    the Company
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    ActivitiesCorgi Sales Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    
    
    
    
    
    100
    %
    
    InactiveCorgi Toys Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    
    
    
    
    
    100
    %
    
    InactiveBlow-ko Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    
    
    
    
    
    100
    %
    
    InactiveBassett Lowke (Railways) Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    
    
    
    
    
    100
    %
    
    InactiveCorgi Collectors Limited
    
    United Kingdom
    
    
    
    
    
    
    100
    %
    
    Inactive
#### People v Bowman

3d Dept: 139 AD3d 1251 (Albany)

denied 8/1/16 (Rivera, J.)
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify
that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                                By: /s/ Thomas A. Vann
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Thomas A. Vann
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

                                By: /s/ William A. Wall
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  William A. Wall
                                    Title: Executive Vice President, Chief
                                    Financial Officer and Secretary

Date: March 10, 2004
Leadership changes hands at DLA Distribution Pearl Harbor
 
  By Matthew Mahoney, DLA Distribtution Public Affairs
  Command of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, changed hands as Cmdr. Sean R. Moody took the helm June17. Moody is a native of Lake Arrowhead, California. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics for Business Management from Occidental College in 2003 and received his commission through Naval Officer Candidate School in 2004. He holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. Afloat, he served as supply officer onboard MCM Crew Swerve, which during his tour rotated between USS Dextrous and USS Defender. He also served as general stores officer and aviation stores officer onboard USS Makin Island during the maiden deployment of the ship. Ashore, he served on the commandant’s staff of the U.S. Naval Academy; the joint logistics staff of Combined Joint Task Force – Horn of Africa; the afloat policy staff of Commander, Naval Air Forces, Pacific; as aide to the Commander of Naval Supply Systems Command and 47th Chief of Supply Corps; as secretary of the Navy Tours with Industry Fellow at Apple, Inc; as support equipment director on the Aviation Operations Staff of NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support, Philadelphia; and as deputy chief of logistics plans at Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet. Moody is a qualified naval aviation supply officer, surface warfare supply corps officer and acquisition professional. He is entitled to wear the Meritorious Service Medal, Joint Service Commendation Medal, Navy Commendation Medals and various other personal, unit and service awards.
# Land and Maritime Public Affairs Specialists honored with 2020 DLA Journalism Awards

/ Published March 19, 2021
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Logistics Agency recognized two DLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs Specialists for garnering top awards during the 2020 DLA Journalism Award competition. The competition is held annually and showcases DLA’s most effective journalism contributions to the DLA mission.

“Congratulations to both Kristin and James for being recognized as leaders among their professional peers,” said DLA Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Adm. Kristen Fabry. “Their skills help build awareness and showcase Land and Maritime’s mission successes.”  

Public Affairs Specialists Kristin Molinaro and James Harless were awarded 1st and 2nd place respectively in the news information and feature portions of the competition. Molinaro, a previous 1st place winner in the news category, was again recognized for her outstanding writing skills. Harless, showcased his talents in crafting articles in the feature category by profiling Land and Maritime associates through the human-interest lens. DLA Energy Public Affairs Officer Irene Smith took 1st place in the feature category.

First place winners will move on to compete in the Defense Media Awards, a Department of Defense competition that pits top journalists from organizations throughout DOD.

Both winners use the full complement of their public affairs skillset to execute the broad range of duties included in executing a robust Land and Maritime Command Information Program that distributes information products focusing on command initiatives, policies and special programs to keep Land and Maritime associates informed.
II

Calendar No. 589

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2339

[Report No. 103–347]

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel WHY KNOT.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 29 (legislative day, JULY 20), 1994

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

AUGUST 19 (legislative day, AUGUST 18), 1994

Reported by Mr. HOLLINGS, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

WHY KNOT.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation
2

S 2339 RS

1 for the vessel WHY KNOT, United States official number

2 688570.

Calendar No. 589

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2339

[Report No. 103–347]

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the

vessel WHY KNOT.

AUGUST 19 (legislative day, AUGUST 18), 1994

Reported without amendment
# Magee assumes command of DLA at Oklahoma City

/ Published Aug. 2, 2022
Richmond, Va., 
Air Force Col. Robert Magee took command of Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Oklahoma City July 26 during an assumption of command ceremony held at the Tinker Event Center on Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma.

DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler presided over the ceremony, beginning his remarks by thanking distinguished guests, family and friends for attending.

Tyler welcomed Magee to the team, challenging him to  build upon the previous commander’s success and make OKC even better than when he found it.

“Taking command is not only an honor and privilege, but a tremendous responsibility as well. Trust in your leadership, respecting your peers, mentoring your subordinates and fully supporting your team to allow them to do their jobs to the best of their ability, day in and day out.” Tyler said. “Remember the warfighter always, because they are the reason we exist, we are trusted mission partners, and our customers count on us to deliver our promises on time."

After receiving the organizational flag, Magee took the stage and delivered a hearty message to his new organization.

“"People matter" are the two most important words in my career. They made me a better airman, a better father, a better friend, a better teammate ... and a better leader. If you're looking to figure out what my command philosophy  is you don't need a pen or paper, it is those two words that guide me like they guide all of us,” said Magee.

“For over six decades, DLA has established a strong reputation for being our nations combat logistics support agency. The foundation is set. We'll continue to build on its architecture by making people matter based on a passion to care while ensuring every member is inspired to continue to make this organization, their teammates and the mission better." Magee said.

Magee previously served as a Deputy Director of Sustainment, U.S Special Operations Command, MacDill Air Force Base, Tampa, Florida. In this role, he led 130 joint logisticians, engineers, and contracting officers in support of 38 special operations platforms spread throughout 21 countries within the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. The directorate is responsible for executing a sustainment network that provides theater-wide logistics support to U.S. and coalition counterterrorism, counterdrug, and crisis response forces in support of U.S Special Operations Command, USCENTCOM, MacDill Air Force Base, Tampa, Florida, and Secretary of Defense level policy, strategy, and operations.  

Magee serves as the single DLA face to the customer for all Tinker Air Force Base DLA organizations. He is responsible for retail-level supply, storage and distribution support to the Oklahoma City Air Logistics Complex, which includes over 600,000 customer orders annually.

Oklahoma City is one of 19 stateside locations within DLA Aviation l that support more than 2,000 major weapon systems and is the U.S. military’s integrated materiel manager for more than 1.2 million repair parts and operating supply items in support of all fixed- and rotor-wing aircraft.