alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33390-33391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-050-08-1430-01; AA-77640]


Lease of Public Land; Crooked Creek, AK

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of realty action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice of realty action involves a proposal for a 20 year 
renewable commercial lease to Chris Bulard, Watana Lodge East Fork 
Adventures. The lease is intended to resolve an unintentional occupancy 
trespass involving commercial recreational facilities related to 
guiding and outfitting activities on public Land.

DATES: Comments and an application must be received on or before August 
3, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments and an application must be submitted to the 
Glennallen District Management Team, P.O. Box 147, Glennallen, Alaska 
99588-0147.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Mushovic (907) 822-3217.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 17.5 acre site examined and found 
suitable for leasing under the provisions of Sec. 302 of the Federal 
Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, and 43 CFR 2920, is described 
as within:
    Sec. 29 and 30, T. 20 S., R. 8 W., Fairbanks Meridian.
    An application will only be accepted from Chris Bulard, who owns 
Watana

[[Page 33391]]

Lodge East Fork Adventures and all existing improvements. The comments 
and application must include a reference to this notice. Fair market 
rental as determined by appraisal will be collected for the use of 
these lands, and reasonable administrative and monitoring costs for 
processing the lease. A final determination will be made after 
completion of an environmental assessment.

David Mushovic,
Realty Specialist.
[FR Doc. 98-16200 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-M
Fitness Center ready to help you keep your healthy New Year’s resolution
 
  By Natalie Skelton, DLA Aviation Public Affairs
  Getting fit and staying that way are New Year’s resolutions that just about everyone has made since resolutions were first imagined. If you’re ready to stick to your goal, the Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond, Virginia’s Fitness Center is ready to help. The Fitness Center, while still in its temporary location in the Community Center, commonly referred to as “The Barn,” offers a variety of machines for virtually every type of workout and remains a popular destination for installation employees. The permanent center is slated to open in Building 32 sometime this year. “We are now closing in on the opening of the new fitness center at DLA.,” Supervisory Sports Specialist Jermaine Edwards said. The center continues to take precautions against the spread of COVID-19 and ensure the health and safety of patrons and staff. “We have instituted a COVID standard operating procedure that outlines all the safety protocols needs to ensure cleaning, and proper measures are taken to make the fitness center as safe as possible,” Edwards said. Patrons and staff are required to wear a mask at all times inside the fitness center unless actively exercising, he explained. Anyone with a federal government-issued ID or non-federal ID holders accompanied by a patron with a federal ID is welcome to use the facility. The center is open Monday through Friday from 6 a.m. to 2 p.m.
Judge H a w ki ns w a s dr a w n t o r e pl a c e Judge B rune tt i . H e ha s r e a d the * b r ie f s , r e v ie w e dth e r e c o r da n dlis te dto th e r e c o r d in g o f o r a l ar g u m e n t. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M ARY C. ENGEL,

P la in tif f - A p p e llan t, v . M I C H A E L B A R R Y ; H A M M E R , D e p u ty S heri ff ; S O W L E S , D eputy S heri ff ; S C O T T S P A R K S , A n im a l C o n tr o l, C o u n tyo f

S a c r a m e n t o ; C OU NT Y O F S AC R AME NT O,

D e f e n d a n ts - A p p e lle e s . N o. 06- 16122 D . C . N o . C V -0 3 -0 2 4 0 3 -M C E /K JM ORDER

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M orr i s on C . E ngl and, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 11, 2008 S a n F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: R E IN H A R D T , H A W K IN S an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. * T h e s tip u la te dm o tio n to d is m is s w ith p r e ju d ic e , f ile dJ an u ary2 9 , 2 0 1 0 , is GR AN T E D. A c e rt i f

i e d c opyof

thi s or de rt o the D i s tr i c tC ourts ha l l c ons t i tut e the m a n d a te o f

th is C o u rt. 

# FI LED FEB 11 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
Exhibit 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Elizabeth A. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/  Elizabeth A. Murphy
------------------------
Elizabeth A. Murphy
Chief Financial Officer
November 5, 2004

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re
Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### US Bank National Association, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Acceptance Corp. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-1, Respondent, v Michael Williams, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[57 NYS3d 431]

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Michael Williams appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Livote, J.), entered December 29, 2014, which denied his motion to compel the deposition of nonparty witnesses.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Where, as here, a defendant defaults in answering the complaint, he or she forfeits the right to engage in discovery *(see Rudra v Friedman,*123 AD3d 1104, 1104 [2014]; *Kolonkowski v Daily News, L.P.,*112 AD3d 677 [2013]; *Singh v Friedson,*36 AD3d 605, 606 [2007]; *Amato v Fast Repair, Inc.,*15 AD3d 429, 430 [2005]; *Santiago v Siega,*255 AD2d 307, 307-308 [1998]). Accordingly, since the defendant Michael Williams defaulted in answering the complaint, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion to compel the deposition of nonparty *651witnesses.

Chambers, J.P., Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             227
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,298
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,354
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,405
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,386
<LOANS>                                         17,879
<ALLOWANCE>                                        399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,051
<DEPOSITS>                                      22,037
<SHORT-TERM>                                       495
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                104
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  26,051
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    357
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   57
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    31
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   445
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 217
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 222
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              223
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        3
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     67
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        40
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.47
<LOANS-NON>                                        241
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    101
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   412
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       13
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  399
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                90
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            309
        

</TABLE>
#### People v Gnesin

1st Dept: 127 AD3d 652 (NY)

denied 3/15/17 (DiFiore, Ch. J.)
# EUR-Lex - 32010M6034 - EN

*|*

# 32010M6034

**Commission Decision of 14/12/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6034 - NORDIC CAPITAL / SAFEROAD / VIACON) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 14.12.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/20091

C(2010) 9355 final

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6034 – NORDIC CAPITAL / SAFEROAD / VIACON Notification of 12.11.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 318, 23.11.2010, p.11

1. On 12.11.2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Saferoad SA ("Saferoad", Norway) controlled by Nordic Capital Fund VII ("Nordic Capital", Jersey) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking ViaCon Holding AB ("ViaCon", Sweden) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Nordic Capital : private equity investments in large and medium-sized companies;

- for Saferoad : manufacturer and distributor of products and solutions for traffic safety;

- for ViaCon : manufacturer and distributor of products used in road and railways construction works.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission,

(signed)

Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
No. 09-10790.

#### Damien Clagon, Petitioner v. David DiGuglielmo, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al.

562 U.S. 852, 131 S. Ct. 110,

178 L. Ed. 2d 67,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6118.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-13-01065-CV

Lisa Kaye Newton 

v.

SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc. d/b/a Forest Park East Funeral Home

NO. 2011-05614 IN THE 281ST DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

STATEWIDE EFILING

FILING

$15.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$164.00

$20.00

$175.00

04/01/2015

06/10/2014

05/09/2014

03/27/2014

02/28/2014

01/30/2014

12/17/2013

12/17/2013

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

ANT

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$414.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this July 13, 2015.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LEONEL HERNANDEZ

,

Appellant

,

v

.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 1 52

- CR

Appeal from the

168 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20160D03827 )

O R D E R

The Court G R ANTS the Court Reporter’s third request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter’s Record until October 18

, 201 9

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WIL BE CONSIDERED

BY THIS COURT.

It is furth er OR DERED that Rachel Simons

, Official Court Reporter for the 168 th Distric t

Court

, for El Passo County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record for the a bove styled and

numbered cause and forward the same to this Court on or before October 18

, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 8 th day of September 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1

 

**                                                THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY                                                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                                                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                                      SECTION 906                                                                           OF THE                                                    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the"Company") on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicatedbelow, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to The MonarchCement Company and will be retained by The MonarchCement Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

Dated:  November 14, 2006

|   |   |  /s/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.                 Walter H. Wulf, Jr.    President and     Chairman of the Board 
                                                   

 

 

  |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Juan Rivera, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

[49 NYS3d 120]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ruben Franco, J.), entered February 3, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the malicious prosecution claims, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that, while in the City to attend his sister’s funeral, he was wrongfully arrested as part of a buy-and-bust operation and charged with criminal sale of a controlled substance, as well as resisting arrest and obstruction of *463governmental administration. Plaintiff was indicted on the drug charge, but all the charges were eventually dismissed by the District Attorney. Defendants established prima facie that there was probable cause to arrest and prosecute plaintiff through the undercover officer’s identification of plaintiff as the person who sold him crack cocaine during the buy-and-bust operation (see *Colon v City of New York,*60 NY2d 78 [1983]).

In opposition, plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to probable cause through his deposition testimony and affidavit (see *De Lourdes Torres v Jones,*26 NY3d 742, 763 [2016]). He denied any involvement with a narcotics transaction, and explained that he attempted to flee only because, in the early morning hours in a Bronx park, he was unaware that the men chasing him were police officers. In addition, plaintiff averred that he did not resist arrest, but was assaulted by the police, and he supplied hospital records detailing his injuries. This evidence, if credited, could support a finding that the police witnesses did not make a “complete and full statement of facts” either to the grand jury or to the District Attorney, that they withheld, misrepresented or falsified evidence, or that they otherwise acted in bad faith *(see Mendez v City of New York,*137 AD3d 468, 471 [1st Dept 2016]). Plaintiff’s evidence also raises an issue of fact whether defendant police officers initiated the prosecution, since their alleged “failure to make a full and complete statement of the facts to the District Attorney or the court, or holding back information that might have affected the results,” may be equated with the initiation of a malicious prosecution *(Ramos v City of New York,*285 AD2d 284, 299-300 [1st Dept 2001]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unpreserved for appeal or otherwise unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.
No. 10-5433.

#### Carl David Jones, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 921, 131 S. Ct. 296,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7598.

178 L. Ed. 2d 194,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, denied.
No. 10-5702.

#### Timothy J. Lange, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 935, 131 S. Ct. 337,

178 L. Ed. 2d 219,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7167.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 645.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summarized financial information extracted
from the Questar Gas Company Income Statement and Balance Sheet for the
period ended June 30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,067
<PP&E>                                         965,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                 401,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 629,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,710
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,974
<OTHER-SE>                                     250,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   629,092
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,476
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  185,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,664
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,038
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,422
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,422
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bioenvision, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher B. Wood,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




                                /s/ Christopher B. Wood
                                ------------------------------------
                                Christopher B. Wood
                                Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                September 11, 2006