alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 26, 2022

No. 04-22-00243-CR

Emery Jay MENCHACA, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-06-0138-CRA

Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on July 25, 2022. Before the due date, Appellant filed a first 

motion for an extension of time to file the brief until September 26, 2022.

Appellant’s motion is granted. Appellant’s brief is due on September 26, 2022. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.6(d). Any further motion for an extension of time to file the brief may be 

disfavored.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of July, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15982]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34, 431]


The Boeing Company (Rotorcraft Division), Mesa, AZ; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on April 13, 1998 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on April 13, 1998 on behalf of workers at The Boeing Company, 
Rotorcraft Division, Mesa, Arizona.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC. this 27th day of May, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-15982 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### Peter D. Waterman et al., Appellants, v CNH America LLC et al., Respondents. CNH America LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff, v Woods Equipment Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[51 NYS3d 913]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered July 8, 2015. The order granted in part the motions of defendants and the cross motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We conclude, for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court, that the motions of defendant-third-party plaintiff, CNH America LLC, and defendant Monroe Tractor & Implement Co., Inc. and the cross motion of third-party defendant were properly granted to the extent that they sought summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for failure to warn. Any other issues raised by plaintiffs in their notice of appeal are deemed abandoned *(see Beatty v Williams,*227 AD2d 912, 912 [1996]; *Ciesinski v Town of Aurora,*202 AD2d 984, 984 [1994]).

Present—Whalen, P.J., Smith, Centra, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.
Child Abuse Prevention Month—Keep our Children Safe
 
  By Katie Campbell, Family Advocacy Program Intern, DLA Installation Management Susquehanna
  Residents of Central Pennsylvania were recently stunned by a report of the death of a two-month-old baby. The child allegedly died as a result of being shaken by her father. National Center for Shaken Baby Syndrome reports there are approximately 1,300 cases of Abusive Head Trauma (another term for Shaken Baby Syndrome) per year. Of these cases, almost 25 percent result in the death of the child.  Unfortunately, this story is not uncommon.Abusive Head Trauma is the leading cause of death in cases of child abuse.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines AHT as an injury to the skull or intracranial contents of an infant or young child due to inflicted blunt impact and/or violent shaking.AHT can occur when an abuser shakes, drops, throws the child or directly hits the child’s head and/or impacts the child’s head while shaking him or her.  One of the most common precursors for AHT to occur is something known as the Period of PURPLE Crying.According to the National Center for Shaken Baby Syndrome, PURPLE stands for Peak of crying, Unexpected, Resists soothing, Pain-like face, Long lasting, and Evening.Contrary to beliefs, an increase in crying can be quite normal behavior among infants, although it can be an extremely frustrating situation for parents. Understanding this acronym and providing information on how to cope with the Period of PURPLE Crying is a very successful method of child abuse prevention.The Department of Defense has adopted the practice of educating parents on the concepts of the Period of PURPLE Crying.New parent support programs, available on most military installations, provide extensive training to parents on safe parenting practices.  Every April, Child Abuse Prevention Month is observed throughout our nation.The DLA Family Advocacy Program is commemorating the month by holding special events, educational displays and planting blue pinwheel gardens across the installations.Blue pinwheels and ribbons are the symbols for Child Abuse Prevention Month. Ann Walker, Family Advocacy Program manager at Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna requests that if you are given a blue pinwheel or ribbon, please display it proudly this month.She adds, “As a community, we commit ourselves to being informed, attentive, and supportive toward helping our children thrive.”  Prevention of child abuse remains everyone’s responsibility.Here are some ways you can help your community by reporting child abuse:Call Emergency Services if you have knowledge that someone is in immediate danger or call your local Child Protective Services or Childhelp National Child Abuse hotline at (1-800) 422-4453 in order to report suspected cases of child abuse.Your installation Family Advocacy Program is also a great resource available to provide services and support in reporting abuse or learning more about child abuse and ways you can help.
No. 10-5622.

#### Henry Rauser, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 932, 131 S. Ct. 328,

178 L. Ed. 2d 213,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7623,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 229.
# Snow Warriors working hard to reopen the installation

/ Published Feb. 1, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Supply Center Columbus might be closed today, but the installation’s Snow Warriors are hard at work clearing the roads and sidewalks. 

For updates on the installation status, call the DLA Land and Maritime Weather Status Line at 614-692-1800 or check the website at www.dla.mil/landandmaritime.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
OF MEDIACOM LLC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001064116
<NAME> MEDIACOM LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,555
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                       397
<INVENTORY>                                     10,135
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         346,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                (69,134)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 448,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   448,410
<SALES>                                         74,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,178
<CGS>                                           24,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   734
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,392
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,644)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,644)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,644)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
# Second quarter employees of the quarter

/ Published May 11, 2021

Defense Logistics Agency Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Jimmy Canlas announced Energy’s second quarter, fiscal year 2021 military, civilian and strategic goals employees of the quarter.

“Please help me in congratulating these awesome teammates for their amazing accomplishments,” Canlas said in an email to the workforce. “Thanks to supervisors for highlighting our outstanding teammates!” 

DLA Energy military winners are:

**Army Maj. Daniel Gaitan,** DLA Energy Strategic Communications Group Military Deputy Director, won the field grade officer category

**Air Force Capt. Cody Gibson**, DLA Energy East Pacific Operations Officer, won the company grade officer category

**Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Robert Russell,** DLA Energy Middle East Supply Petty Officer, won the junior NCO category

DLA Energy civilian winners are: 

**William Kennedy**, DLA Energy Japan Resolution Specialist, won the GS/WG/WL 7-12 category 

**Irene Smith**, DLA Energy Strategic Communications Group Deputy Director and Public Affairs Officer, won the GS13-15/WS category

DLA Director's Strategic Goals Award nomination:

**DLA Energy Americas East Southeast Quality Team** won the Small Team Category. The nine member team is assigned across four states and coordinates with Headquarters DLA Energy Quality Program Managers to provide Contract Quality Assurance/Surveillance of over $245 million in energy support to over 50 Department of Defense installations as well as Federal/Civilian agencies throughout Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, both Central and South America, Bermuda, and the Caribbean areas of operation.  

The team members are:

**Fernando RomeroStacy StollBryan HillAngela PhillipsJerry AllenArmy Sgt. 1st Class Billy ViljoenRonnie BrockElias OdarAir Force Tech Sgt. Dominic Mersino**

“We all know that no one succeeds alone, so I offer my personal thanks to everyone who was part of the larger team that continues to make us successful day-in and day-out,” Canlas said. “Again, congratulations to all the winners as well as to those who were submitted for competition!”
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAdvanstar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ David W. Montgomery  |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | David W.  Montgomery     |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   |                     |
|   | Date: May 13, 2003       |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This certification is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification shall not to bedeemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section. This certification does not constitute a part of Registrant’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification and to which itis an exhibit.

 

----
# National Police Week spotlight: Travis McCarthy

/ Published May 19, 2023
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
*Editor’s Note: May 14-20 is National Police Week. This is a part of a series of spotlights highlighting members of the Defense Logistics Agency Police Force who work 24/7 to protect DLA people and property.*

**Your name:** Travis McCarthy

**Job title and location:** Police officer at Defense Supply Center Columbus, Ohio.

**What inspired you to become a police officer?**I became a police officer to help community members in their times of need and to help change negative perceptions of law enforcement through positive interactions.   

**When did you join DLA’s police force and what did you do before you got here?**I joined the DLA police force in September 2021. Before that I worked as a Marine Corp Reserve military police officer from 2014 to 2020 and a security officer for Paragon Systems from 2017 to 2022. I also received a bachelor’s degree in criminal justice from Ohio University in 2020.

**Describe your typical workday in 2-3 sentences.**My normal day as a police officer at DSCC is arming up for a shift, figuring out whether my post is going to be patrolling or the main gate, attending roll call to get information from the prior shift, and getting gear needed for the shift. From there, I conduct security patrols around the perimeter of the center, check buildings for security violations such as unsecure doors or vaults, and respond to calls for service from dispatch.    

**Describe the most dangerous situation you’ve encountered on duty.**One of our most dangerous situations is responding to an alarm for highly secured areas like those with sensitive items like firearms. Upon arrival at the location, you need to be vigilant to give real-time locations including which doors you’re entering and north/south/east/west directions so arriving officers can coordinate exits that need to be covered. You also have to be careful about pointing a firearm at a person when your guns are drawn.

**What’s the hardest part of being a police officer and why?**Working every day, step by step, to change the negative view of police officers until we’re in the good graces of people in the communities we serve.

**What do you like most about your job and why?**What I like most about my job is being able to work with so many good men and women in the agency.

**What’s the biggest security infraction you see employees make?**The biggest security infractions are when employees scan into secured doors and allow people to piggyback behind them so they don’t have to scan their common access cards.

**What are you passionate about outside of work?** My passions outside of work are lifting and running, hanging out with friends, playing video games and shooting guns.
#### Com. v. Tyson

12/01/2015

537 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 119 A.3d 353
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Edward A. Mueller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Qwest Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 30, 2007



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    EDWARD A.
MUELLER             
|Edward A. Mueller                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President
#### Com. v. Jackson

10/07/2015

411 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 460
# AUSA LANPAC attendees learn about operational contracting support from DLA

/ Published May 29, 2019

Attendees of the 2019 Association of the United States Army’s LANPAC Symposium and Exposition, held in Honolulu May 21-23, learned about operational contracting support from the Defense Logistics Agency. LANPAC is an international event highlighting the role of land forces throughout the Indo-Pacific region.

Matthew Beebe, director DLA Acquisition, shared details about the role OCS plays in support of regional combatant commanders while serving on a panel on the topic of global logistics. Operational contracting support is the process of planning for and obtaining supplies, services and construction material during an operation or contingency. The panel was chaired by Army Lt. Gen. Aundre Piggee, deputy chief of staff for Army logistics.

Other symposium topics included strengthening and building alliances and partnerships, and innovation and agility across the Indo-Pacific region.
#### Jacqueline A. Gillern, as Administrator of the Estate of John J. Gillern, Jr., Deceased, et al., Respondents, v Ed *439Mahoney et al., Defendants, and Memorial Sloane Kettering, Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 819]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered January 7, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant Memorial Sloane Kettering’s (MSK) motion to dismiss plaintiff’s causes of action for negligence and wrongful death, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Appeal from order, same Court and Justice, entered on or about August 8, 2016, which denied the motion of MSK seeking leave to amend its answer to assert the worker’s compensation affirmative defense, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Decedent, plaintiff’s husband and an employee of MSK, became intoxicated at a holiday party organized by workers in MSK’s facilities department. The party was not sanctioned by MSK, held on MSK property, or paid for by MSK, and all employees there were off duty. Coworker friends of the decedent contacted plaintiff, a registered nurse at MSK, and then helped decedent into her car. Plaintiff drove home and left decedent in the car, parked in their driveway, to sleep off his condition. Approximately one hour later, plaintiff checked on decedent, and found him now on the floor of the back seat, unresponsive. The autopsy report lists the cause of the death as alcohol intoxication and positional asphyxia.

The motion court erred in denying summary judgment to MSK. Their employees, in assisting decedent and placing him in his wife’s care, did not assume a duty, and nothing they did placed him in a worse or different position of danger *(see Malpeli v Yenna,*81 AD3d 607 [2d Dept 2011]; *compare Seeger v Marketplace,*101 AD3d 1691 [4th Dept 2012]). Any opinions rendered about medical attention being unnecessary were nonactionable gratuitous commentary *(see Feeney v Manhattan Sports Club,*227 AD2d 293 [1st Dept 1996]). Moreover, placing decedent into the car was not the proximate cause of his death; it merely furnished the occasion for the unfortunate occurrence *(see Sheehan v City of New York,*40 NY2d 496 [1976]; *see also Bonomonte v City of New York,*79 AD3d 515 [1st Dept 2010], *affd*17 NY3d 866 [2011]).

Our findings render MSK’s remaining arguments, including those regarding the affirmative defense of workers’ compensation, academic.

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Webber, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
-79.5 -79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

 37.5

 38.0

 38.5

 39.0

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/09

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
EPA Attendees on AZ‐Only Exceptional Events Listening Session

November 20, 2013

First Name Last Name EPA Office

Janet McCabe Office of Air and Radiation

Tom Powers Office of Air and Radiation

Kevin Bailey Office of Congressional Affairs

Mike Koerber Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Phil Lorang Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Rhea Jones Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Martha Keating Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Beth Palma Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Tom Rosendahl Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sara Terry Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Colleen McKaughan US EPA Region 9

Michael Flagg US EPA Region 9

Meredith Kurpius US EPA Region 9

Brent Maier US EPA Region 9

Gwen Yoshimura US EPA Region 9
#### Lau v Margaret E. Pescatore Parking, Inc.

1st Dept: 145 AD3d 567

granted