alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15772]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[UT-020-08-2811-00]


Salt Lake District Proposed Fire Management Plan

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management, Salt Lake District Office, has 
completed an Environmental Assessment (EA)/Finding of No Significant 
Impact (FONSI) for a Proposed Fire Management Plan which would amend 
the following plans: (1) Pony Express Resource Management Plan (1990); 
(2) Box Elder Resource Management Plan (1986); (3) Isolated Tract 
Planning Analysis (1985); (4) Park City Management Framework Plan 
(1982); and (5) Randolph Management Framework Plan (1980). The Proposed 
Fire Management Plan amends the plans by reintroducing fire as a 
critical natural process into the ecosystem and providing a 
comprehensive and consistent policy of how fires are handled for all 
public lands administered by the District.

DATES: The proposed plan amendment may be protested. The protest period 
will commence with the date of publication of this notice. Protests 
must be submitted on or before July 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Protests must be addressed to the Director (WO-210), Bureau 
of Land Management, Attn: Brenda Williams, Resource Planning Team, 1849 
C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240, within 30 days after the date of 
publication of this notice for the proposed planning amendment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Washington, Bureau of Land 
Management, Salt Lake District Office, 2370 South 2300 West, telephone 
(801) 977-4346. Copies of the Proposed Plan Amendment are available for 
review at the Salt Lake District Office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any person who participated in the planning 
process and has an interest which is or may be adversely affected by 
the Proposed Plan Amendment may protest to the Director of the Bureau 
of Land Management. The protest must be in writing and filed within 30 
days of the date of publication of this Notice of Availability in the 
Federal Register. The protest must be specific and contain the 
following information:

--The name, mailing address, telephone number and interest of the 
person filing the protest;
--A statement of the issue(s) being protested;
--A statement of the part(s) of the proposed amendment being protested;
--A copy of all documents addressing the issue(s) that were submitted 
by the protestor during the planning process; and
--A concise statement explaining why the BLM State Director's proposed 
decision is believed to be in error.

    In the absence of timely objections, this proposal shall become the 
final determination of the Department of the Interior.
G. William Lamb,
State Director, Utah.
[FR Doc. 98-15772 Filed 6-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P
Exhibit
32.2

MTS
SYSTEMS CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Susan E. Knight, the Chief Financial
Officer of MTS Systems Corporation (the Company), has executed this
Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: February 7, 2006

| |                                            | 
| | ------------------------------------------ | 
| | /s/ Susan E. Knight                        | 
| |                                            | 
| | Susan E. Knight                            | 
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 

---
Exhibit 32.2

                          18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Company.


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The
Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

Dated:  August 14, 2003.


                                           /s/ Debra P. Roe
                                          Debra P. Roe, CPA
                                          Chief Financial Officer and
                                          Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darrell B. Lee, ChiefFinancial Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of MOCON, Inc.

 

 

Date:  May 14, 2009

 
| /s/ Darrell B. Lee      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Darrell B. Lee          |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



The undersigned, Sidney W. Emery Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of MTS Systems Corporation (the Company), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 30, 2006 (the Report).



The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: February 5, 2007



/s/ SIDNEY W. EMERY, Jr.Sidney W. Emery, Jr.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


---
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

1 Although filed as a civil rights complaint seeking damages, see 42

U.S.C. § 1983, the district court construed the complaint as a challenge to the

duration of confinement. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994)

(no cause of action for damages under § 1983 unless prior successful challenge to 

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JAN 9 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JAMES E. PATRICK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

vs.

L.E. BRUCE, Ellsworth Correctional

Facility and CHARLES SIMMONS,

Secretary of Corrections,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 97-3161

(D.C. No. 97-CV-3208)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRORBY, EBEL, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Patrick, an inmate appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals

from the dismissal without prejudice of his habeas petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254,1

 for
confinement); Preiser v. Rodgriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). Although Mr.

Patrick takes issue with this conversion of his complaint, in light of his

contentions on appeal, it is apparent that there is an injunctive component of the

relief he seeks. Accordingly, the complaint is properly construed as a habeas

petition at this point.

- 2 -

failure to exhaust state remedies. The district court also denied a certificate of

appealability, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). He contends that the Defendants are

required to convert his indeterminate sentence to one under the Kansas

Sentencing Guidelines.

A notice of appeal was filed along with his initial pleading, bringing into

question our jurisdiction. While a timely filed motion for reconsideration was

pending in the district court, however, Mr. Patrick filed an amended notice of

appeal and also filed a brief in this court. Thus, we have jurisdiction. See Fed.

R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(C); Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248-49 (1992) (appellate

brief may be the functional equivalent of a notice of appeal).

The district court was correct in determining that Mr. Patrick must exhaust

his state remedies. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). We DENY Mr. Patrick’s

motion for issuance of a certificate of appealability and DISMISS the appeal.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Datamedic Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-88589, 333-87795 and 333-73097) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-74773 and
333-48829) on Form S-8 of InfoCure Corporation of our report dated May 25,
1999, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Datamedic Holding
Corp. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency), and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1999,
which report appears in the Form 10-K/A of InfoCure Corporation dated December
31, 1999.

                                                /s/ KPMG LLP

                                                KPMG LLP


Melville, New York
April 27, 2000
No. 09-11366.

#### Juan Barrientos-Hernandez, Petitioner v. Oregon.

562 U.S. 876, 131 S. Ct. 185,

178 L. Ed. 2d 111,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6623.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.
No. 09-11507.

#### Ardell D. Noble, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 884, 131 S. Ct. 212,

178 L. Ed. 2d 127,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7154.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 961.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          93,054
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,082,406
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,493,750
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,522,407
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,537,648
<LOANS>                                     37,412,959
<ALLOWANCE>                                    179,420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,763,281
<DEPOSITS>                                  31,639,064
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            135,677
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,968
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,584,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              43,763,281
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,867,236
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              219,673
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               134,508
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,221,417
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,549,427
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,883,057
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,338,360
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   63,004
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              10,786
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,568,242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (181,455)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (181,455)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (71,458)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .078
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   688,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               154,199
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   49,925
<RECOVERIES>                                    12,142
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              179,420
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           179,420
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Demorest, Chief Executive Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MOCON, Inc.

 

 

Date:  May 13, 2011

 
| /s/   Robert L. Demorest  |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Robert   L. Demorest      |
| Chief   Executive Officer |

 

----
# HDIFC welcomes the holiday spirit into the building 

/ Published Dec. 3, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
As the month of December begins, members of the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center welcomed some pint-sized visitors into the building to kick off the holiday season.

                HDIFC welcomes the holiday spirit into the building                            As the month of December begins, members of the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center welcomed some pint-sized visitors into the building to kick off the holiday season.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 211201-D-AU600-201No these weren’t elves, although they shared their holiday spirit. They were children from the site’s daycare.

“Today we worked with Stars and Stripes Learning Center here at HDIFC to come together and do some caroling ­– get us in the Christmas spirit and make crafts for our beautiful Christmas tree that we have,” said Tiffany Schmidt the chief of Battle Creek’s Morale, Welfare and Recreation.

HDIFC employees looked on as the children sang seasonal staples “Jingle Bells” and “Rudolph the Red-nosed Reindeer” for the crowd. After the caroling, the preschoolers counted down for the HDIFC’s holiday tree lighting.

The children finished up their day with ornament arts and crafts in the Palm Garden room.

The day was like a field trip according to the Executive Director of Young Child Associates Learning Center Angie Torres.                HDIFC welcomes the holiday spirit into the building                            As the month of December begins, members of the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center welcomed some pint-sized visitors into the building to kick off the holiday season.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 211201-D-AU600-202

“They have been practicing their songs,” said Torres. “The crafts were something new and they loved it. All the kids are wearing green and red to start off December with the holiday spirit.”

Afterwards, the children’s ornaments were placed onto the HDIFC tree to serve as decoration for the remainder of the holiday season.

Due to COVID restrictions this event was put on hold during 2020 but was able to resume this year and a small audience was able to witness the festivities.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 23.2 Consent of KPMG LLP


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Datamedic Holding Corp.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-88589, 333-87795 and 333-73097) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-74773 and
333-48829) on Form S-8 of InfoCure Corporation of our report dated May 25,
1999, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Datamedic Holding
Corp. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency), and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1999,
which report appears in the Form 10-K of InfoCure Corporation dated December
31, 1999.



KPMG LLP


Melville, New York
March 30, 2000
----

----

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Dudi Machluf                               |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Name: Dudi Machluf                                  |   |
|   |   | Title:   Co-Chief Executive Officer  |   |
|   |   |                                                |   |

----

----
29958 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 105 /Tuesday, June 2, 1998 /Rules and Regulations

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 1

[WT Docket No. 97–82, ET Docket No. 94–

32; FCC 97–413]

Competitive Bidding Proceeding

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This document corrects a

portion of the Commission’s

competitive bidding rules for auctions

that were published in the Federal

Register of January 15, 1998 (63 FR

2315).

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 2, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark Becker, Auctions and Industry

Analysis Division, Wireless

Telecommunications Bureau, at (202)

418–7532.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Federal Communications Commission

published a document adopting uniform

competitive bidding rules for all future

auctions in the Federal Register of

January 15, 1998 (63 FR 2315). This

document makes a minor correction to

the final rules adopted in the Third

Report and Order, Amendment of Part

1 of the Commission’s Rules—

Competitive Bidding Procedures,

Allocation of Spectrum Below 5 GHz

Transferred from Federal Government

Use, 4660–4685 MHZ, as it appeard in

the Federal Register of January 15,

1998.

1. On page 2341, in the third column,

§ 1.2105 is corrected to add paragraph

(a)(2)(x) before ‘‘Note to paragraph (a)’’

to read as follows:

§ 1.2105 Bidding application and

certification procedures; prohibition of

collusion.

(a) * * *

(2) * * *

(x) Certification that the applicant is

not in default on any Commission

licenses and that it is not delinquent on

any non-tax debt owed to any Federal

agency.

* * * * *

Federal Communications Commission.

Amy J. Zoslov,

Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis

Division, Wireless Telecommunications

Bureau.

[FR Doc. 98–14600 Filed 6–1–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P