alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.69



 Exhibit 4.69 
 (English Translation) 
 Supplementary Agreement to Web Layout Copyright License
Agreement 
 This Supplementary Agreement to Web Layout Copyright License Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered
into by and among the following parties on January 30, 2011 in Beijing: 
  

			
	 Party A:
	  	Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
	 Address:
	  	No. 10 Shangdi 10th Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, The People’s Republic of China
	 Party B:
	  	Baidu Netcom Science Technology Co., Ltd.
	 Address:
	  	No. 10 Shangdi 10th Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, The People’s Republic of China

 WHEREAS: 
 The parties entered into the Web Layout Copyright License Agreement on March 1, 2004. Pursuant to Section 2 of the Web Layout Copyright License Agreement, the Licensee agreed to pay the Licensor
license fees. The specified amount of the license fees and the form of payment are set forth in Appendix 2 to the Web Layout Copyright License Agreement. Pursuant to Appendix 2 to the Web Layout Copyright License Agreement, the Licensee should pay
RMB10,000 per year to the Licensor as license fees. The Licensor has the right to determine whether or not to exempt the Licensee’s obligation to pay license fees. 
 The parties agree to terminate the provisions above through friendly negotiation. 

This agreement shall be executed in two originals, each party holding one original. All the originals shall have the same legal effect.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed by its legal representative on
its behalf as of the date first set forth above. 
  

			
	 The Licensor:
	  	Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
	 Legal Representative:
	  	/s/ Legal Representative
	 Company seal:
	  	(The company seal of Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.)
	 The Licensee:
	  	Baidu Netcom Science Technology Co., Ltd.
	 Legal Representative:
	  	/s/ Legal Representative
	 Company seal:
	  	(The company seal of Baidu Netcom Science Technology Co., Ltd.)


  
 1
NO. 03-14-00701-CR

BARRY PIZZO § IN THE

§

VS. § THIRD COURT

§

STATE OF TEXAS § OF APPEALS

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes E. Chevo Pastrano and hereby files this appearance as 

attorney of record for BARRY PIZZO, Appellant. Undersigned counsel received 

notice of appointment to represent Mr. Pizzo on June 8, 2015. Address and 

other contact information is as follows:

E. Chevo Pastrano

The Pastrano Law Firm, P.C.

202 Travis Street, Suite 307

Houston, Texas 77002

713.222.1100

832.218.7114-fax

chevo@pastranolaw.com

Respectfully submitted,

The Pastrano Law Firm, P.C.

The Old Cotton Exchange Building

202 Travis Street, Suite 307

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 222-1100

(832) 218-7114 - FAX

By: ___________________________________

E. Chevo Pastrano

State Bar No. 24037240

chevo@pastranolaw.com

ACCEPTED

03-14-00701-CR

5613152

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

6/10/2015 9:22:22 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/10/2015 9:22:22 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on June 10, 2015, a true and correct copy of the 

above and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, 

Comal County, Texas, via facsimile and/or email:

Comal County District Attorney

150 North Seguin, Suite 307

New Braunfels, Texas 78130

Telephone: 830.221.1300

Facsimile: 830.608.2008

E. Chevo Pastrano
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tulsie Singh, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 530]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Troy K. Webber, J.), rendered September 25, 2015, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted course of sexual conduct against a child in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 10 years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground of preindictment delay (see *People v Singer,*44 NY2d 241 [1978]; *People v Taranovich,*37 NY2d 442, 445 [1975]). Based on the record regarding the unwillingness of the victim to testify before the grand jury, the People sufficiently explained the 4V2-year delay between first detaining defendant and ultimately initiating the prosecution after the victim became able to testify. The evidence before the motion court established that the determination to delay the prosecution was made in good faith and not to gain a tactical advantage (see *People v Vernace,*96 NY2d 886, 888 [2001]). We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments on this issue.

Defendant’s constitutional speedy trial claim regarding the delay between the indictment and the guilty plea is unreviewable because defendant has not provided the minutes of any of the relevant adjournments *(see People v Olivo,*52 NY2d 309, 320 [1981]; *People v Arroyo,*93 AD3d 608 [1st Dept 2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 957 [2012]). To the extent that the present record permits review, we find no violation of defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial (see *Taranovich,*37 NY2d at 445). Defendant has not established what portion of the delay was caused by the People, or that he was prejudiced by any delay.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Gische, Kern and Oing, JJ.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-60832 

Conference Calendar

 

KOURTNEY DANTE BYNUM,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BOLIVAR COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT;

H. M. "MACK" GRIMMETT; 

CHARLES ANDERSON; WILLIE DISON,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:97-CV-103

- - - - - - - - - -

October 22, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kourtney Dante Bynum (Mississippi prisoner # 57301) appeals

the dismissal of his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Bynum argues that because his appointed

counsel failed to provide effective assistance of counsel, he was

required to have access to a law library while he was a pretrial

detainee at the Bolivar County Jail. Given that Bynum was

represented by appointed counsel and that an ineffective-
No. 97-60832

- 2 -

assistance-of-counsel claim is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512

U.S. 477, 486 (1994), the district court did not abuse its

discretion in dismissing Bynum’s action as frivolous. Norton v.

Dimazana, 122 F.3d 286, 291 (5th Cir. 1997); Bounds v. Smith, 430

U.S. 817, 830-31 (1977). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# DOD reinforces guidelines for releasing unclassified, classified documents

/ Published June 25, 2021

A June 22 memo from the Defense Department director of intelligence, law enforcement and security is reminding employees about their responsibility to protect nonpublic information (A DLA Common Access Card is required to view the memo).

Recent high-profile security breaches to fuel infrastructure and near-record levels of phishing attempts indicate increased attempts to gain access to sensitive, protected information, DLA Operations Security Program Manager Erica Quinley said.

“DLA employees must be vigilant and on high alert at all times, taking proactive measures to protect sensitive information, physically and digitally, as well as recognizing and reporting suspicious behavior and collection attempts,” she said.

DLA Information Security Program Manager Matthew Baker concurred.

“Cyberattacks highlight the importance of properly protecting our digital data. DLA employees can do their part by only using approved government systems to transmit official information,” he said.

According to the memo, DOD employees must avoid using nongovernment websites or applications such as those without a “.mil” or “.gov” extension when posting or uploading information. Employees can post controlled unclassified information only to government or approved contractor websites that use encrypted transmission and require certificate-based or password and ID access. Employees should likewise avoid verbal discussions involving nonpublic information on unprotected sites or applications.

In a video message to the workforce, DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic explains the challenges the agency’s cybersecurity team faces daily. 

"On any given day, the DLA network is subject to countless cyberattacks with the intent to disrupt operations and cause harm to the warfighter, our industry partners and our nation," she said.
Decided November 1, 2016

#### Blake T.L., Matter of (Robert L.)

2d Dept: 141 AD3d 525 (Proceeding No. 1)

denied*
161 A.3d 766

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. WILLIAM BURKERT, DEFENDANT.

March 9, 2017

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion of the Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment for leave to file a supplemental amicus curiae brief (M-778) is granted; said brief to be served and filed on or before March 31, 2017. The parties may serve and file briefs in response on or before April 24, 2017.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ann M. Early, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 681]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 12, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits from December 17, 2001 through January 17, 2002, because she was not totally unemployed.

Claimant, an office manager for a corporation, was listed in *951the minutes of a corporate resolution as its vice-president. Claimant worked in the corporation’s New York City office until December 14, 2001. She began receiving unemployment insurance benefits on December 17, 2001. In certifying for benefits, claimant failed to disclose her continuing status as a corporate vice-president, as well as the services she continued to perform on behalf of the corporation. The record reveals that claimant remained a signatory on the corporate checking account, signed several checks in January 2002, met twice with the corporation’s bookkeeper and dealt with numerous pieces of corporate mail that had been forwarded to her residence.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was ineligible for benefits from December 17, 2001 through January 17, 2002, because she was not totally unemployed. This Court has held that a claimant who is an officer in a corporation, particularly a claimant who continues to perform services for the corporation, is not totally unemployed within the meaning of the Labor Law, even if the corporation’s business is dormant and the services performed on its behalf are minimal or unprofitable *(see Matter of Sichel [Commissioner of Labor],*301 AD2d 771, 772 [2003]; *Matter of DiPietro [Commissioner of Labor],*250 AD2d 916 [1998]).

In addition, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant made willful false statements to obtain benefits, resulting in the assessment of a recoverable overpayment and the loss of benefit days. Claimant’s failure to disclose her continuing corporate status and performance of services when certifying for benefits, despite her receipt of the unemployment insurance handbook which clearly explains the reporting requirements, supports the finding that she made willful false statements on her application for benefits *(see Matter of Schenker [Commissioner of Labor],*284 AD2d 765, 766 [2001]). As the Board’s decision is supported by the requisite substantial evidence, it will not be disturbed.

Peters, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
# DLA helps federal partners replenish national stockpile of personal protective equipment

/ Published Sept. 14, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency is working with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Department of Health and Human Services to replenish the nearly depleted Strategic National Stockpile with personal protective equipment as the nation continues responding to COVID-19.

From July to late August, DLA Troop Support Clothing and Textiles and Construction and Equipment supply chains awarded contracts for nearly 4.5 billion medical gloves, 5.2 million face shields, 260 million face masks and 900,000 disposable gowns. The items are scheduled for phased delivery to SNS warehouses by November, said Howard Page, C&E’s director of Supplier Operations.

“DLA is aggressively working with its vendors to ensure the requirements of the SNS can be met timely,” he said. “The market conditions have impacted vendor reliability and lead-times, but we are maximizing all that industry can offer to meet the collective PPE requirements of the U.S. Government.”

On September 11, DLA awarded additional contracts to five American manufacturers to provide up to 15 million COVID-19 reusable isolation gowns for the SNS. And on September 14, nine contracts were awarded to American businesses to provide up to 275 million disposable isolation gowns. Delivery of all of the gowns will be complete by January 2021.

The SNS supplements state and local supplies during public health emergencies like COVID-19 for short-term use when adequate supplies are not readily available, according to the HHS public health emergency website.

DLA worked with HHS to validate supply sources and ensure the technical requirements for each item were met to provide sufficient protection for healthcare workers, Page said.

Third party logistics provider Travis Association for the Blind, in Austin, Texas, stores and distributes personal protective equipment to three SNS warehouses in Utah, Indiana and Mississippi, said Denise Vogelei, C&T 3PL contracting officer. 

“We have daily calls on this topic, and every day Travis sends a tracking spreadsheet that captures incoming and outgoing shipments, pallet quantities, locations of deliveries to the SNS warehouses, etc.,” Vogelei said.

DLA closely coordinates deliveries to SNS warehouses with HHS as the number of daily receipts and orders constantly change, said Paul Diak, C&T supervisory customer account specialist.

“SNS locations can only schedule so many trucks, so we have been working closely with HHS modifying schedules on the fly, and our 3PL provider has been very accommodating,” he added.
# Disposition Services employee's unique musical hobby

/ Published July 1, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich, 
Music is a passion for many and Wayne Hayward, a sales chief for Useable Sales Branch at Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services in Battle Creek, Michigan, takes his passion to another level as a part-time luthier.  

A luthier builds and repairs string instruments like guitars, violins and ukuleles – all of which Wayne has made during his 20-year hobby as a luthier. Wayne’s relationship with music dates to his childhood when his mother - a drum majorette - encouraged him to start piano lessons.  

“[My] mother forced me into playing piano when I was a kid and I hated every bit of it,” Wayne said. “But that gave me the foundation for the rest of it.”  

After freshman year of college, Wayne decided to take a different path and joined the United States Air Force as a mission generation vehicular equipment mechanic. It was during his time in the Air Force, he discovered his interest in making instruments.  

“I started out making flutes and my wife told me I had too many flutes laying around the house, so I had to find a new hobby,” Wayne said. 

While searching for a new project, his father, who was also a woodworker, passed away. This led him to his next instrument venture – a mandolin.  

“He [my father] always wanted to learn how to play a mandolin and never learned so I thought it would be kind of cool to learn how to build one,” Wayne said.  

In honor of his father, Wayne ordered a mandolin kit online but realized the kit was subpar to his own woodworking talent and decided to take matters into his own hands by designing and building a mandolin of his own.  

“I did some research online and figured out how to build one. I thought that would be the end of it until some guys played it and wanted me to build them one. And then the next thing I know, I started building tons of them,” Wayne said.  

One mandolin turned into countless other string instrument projects – some as custom design projects and others as restoration projects. Wayne’s luthier catalog includes mandolins, ukuleles, violins and several types of guitars.   

After two decades as a part-time luthier, Wayne still gets excited about sitting down with a new client to discuss a project.  

“The whole thing is really cool,” Wayne said. “I really enjoy putting it together, figuring out how to build it and making it work. And then ultimately listening to somebody play it. I can’t pinpoint any piece of the puzzle that doesn’t give me some sort of excitement.” 

----

In June music is celebrated around the globe on World Music Day. Playing live is encouraged – to introduce others to music they may not normally listen to. On the next World Music Day, think of the luthiers behind the string instruments and the passion and adoration they have for their craft.
2017-1630.

#### Copeland v. Trumbull Cty. Children Servs.

In Mandamus. On respondents’ motions to dismiss. Motions granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.3


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-117509) relating to the registration of
shares to be used under Elbit Medical Imaging Ltd. 2001 Incentive Plan to
Employees and Officers, of our report dated February 28, 2005, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Gamida cell Ltd. included in the Annual
Report of Elbit Medical Imaging Ltd. (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31,
2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




Tel Aviv                                            KOST, FORER GABBAY& KASIERER
Israel
June 27, 2005                                    A Member of Ernst &Young Global
#### In the Matter of Kyle Jiggetts, Appellant, v New York City Human Resources Administration et al., Respondents.

[65 NYS3d 706]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered November 1, 2016, which denied and dismissed petitioner’s CPLR article 78 petition to reverse an arbitration award, granted respondents’ cross motion for sanctions, ordered petitioner to pay $10,000 in sanctions, and enjoined petitioner from commencing any further actions or proceedings arising out of his termination of employment from the New York City Department of Homeless Services without prior leave of the Supreme Court, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner is collaterally estopped from arguing that he has standing to raise any challenges to the arbitration award that *553concluded that, as a per diem employee, he was not entitled to challenge respondent New York City Human Resources Administration’s termination of his employment in 1994 under the disciplinary review procedures set forth in the applicable collective bargaining agreement *(see Jiggetts v New York City Human Resources,*Sup Ct, NY County, Oct. 20, 2011, Huff, J., index No. 400903/11; *Jiggetts v New York City Off. of Collective Bargaining,*Sup Ct, NY County, Dec. 30, 2014, Billings, J., index No. 400361/14; *see Chupka v Lorenz-Schneider Co.,*12 NY2d 1, 6 [1962]; *see also Buechel v Bain,*97 NY2d 295, 303-304 [2001], *cert denied*535 US 1096 [2002]; *Gramatan Home Invs. Corp. v Lopez,*46 NY2d 481 [1979]; *BDO Seidman LLP v Strategic Resources Corp.,*70 AD3d 556, 560 [1st Dept 2010]).

To the extent petitioner’s remaining claims of discrimination and retaliation are not barred by res judicata principles based on prior federal and state court rulings rejecting his challenges to HRA’s termination of his employment in 1994 *(Matter of Josey v Goord,*9 NY3d 386, 389-390 [2007]; *Matter of Hunter,*4 NY3d 260, 269 [2005]; *see Jiggetts v New York City Human Resources Admin.,*US Dist Ct, SD NY, 11 Civ 8749, Buchwald, J., 2012), they are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations, as the instant petition, filed in 2015, was commenced more than three years after petitioner was terminated in 1994 *(see Horan v New York Tel. Co.,*309 AD2d 642, 642 [1st Dept 2003]), and well over four months after the agency’s determination (CPLR 217; *Faillace v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*130 AD2d 34, 43 [1st Dept 1987], *lv denied*70 NY2d 613 [1987]; *Matter of Edmead v McGuire,*67 NY2d 714, 716 [1986]).

As petitioner has continued to pursue lawsuits long after their lack of any legal basis was made apparent to him, the court providently exercised its discretion in imposing sanctions (22 NYCRR §§ 130-1.1, 130-1.1-a [b]). The court also providently exercised its discretion in enjoining petitioner from commencing any further suits without prior court approval given his history of frivolous litigation *(see Bikman v 595 Broadway Assoc.,*88 AD3d 455 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*21 NY3d 856 [2013]).

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30588-30589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ANM-06]


Amendment of Class E Airspace; Colorado Springs, CO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The direct final rule published on March 23, 1998 (63 FR 
13779) changed the name of the VORTAC navigational aid in the Colorado 
Springs, CO, Class E3 airspace legal description from Colorado Springs 
VORTAC to Black Forest VORTAC. The name change of the VORTAC is for 
safety reasons and does not affect the existing boundaries of the 
airspace.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 13779 is 
effective 0901 UTC, June 18, 1998.


[[Page 30589]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Ripley, ANM-520.6, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue S.W., Renton, Washington, 
98055-4056; telephone number: (425) 227-2527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published the direct final rule with 
a request for comments in the Federal Register on March 23, 1998 (63 FR 
13779). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-
controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse 
public comment. The comment period ended May 4, 1998. This direct final 
rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and 
that unless a written adverse comment or a written notice of intent to 
submit such an adverse comment were received within the comment period, 
the regulation would become effective on June 18, 1998. No adverse 
comments were received, and thus this document confirms that the final 
rule will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on May 28, 1998.
Joe E. Gingles,
Acting Assistant Manager, Air Traffic Division, Northwest Mountain 
Region.
[FR Doc. 98-15061 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M