Michae l Selig , MD , FACC , CFI- H ,^,- , rvOCKE' ^

281 6 Orefiel d Roa d ; f |!^R\N ^ ^ ^ ' ^ Allentown . PA . 1810 4

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N 'T:-0-' .

OFFIC E O F HEARING S _ , c:> ^ WASHINGTON , D.C . o^^B j i t :T:^'^ ^ L J

.. o Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n '"''Com'^dnints"''^' ' ^'''"'''^ ' Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r V . Docket : 2010-121 1 M & R Helicopters , LLC . Responden t

MOTIO N FO R MOR E DEFINIT E STATEMENT HOLDIN G RESPONDEN TT O AHIGHE R STANDAR D THA N TH E FA AOFFICIAL S AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE L B . SELIG , MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (non-operationa l sinc e 2007 ) who m aver s an d file s th e followin g Motio n fo rmor e definit e statemen t i n regar d t o n o FA A Officer s kne wabou t th e newe rdefinitio n o f employer , thereb ytryin g t o hol d responden t t o a highe rstandar d tha n th e FAAOfficers . 1 . Responden t ha s mad e ever yeffor t t o organiz e an d clearl ypresen t argument s i n clearl yenumerate d paragraph s i n accordanc e wit h standar d mandate d rule s o fprocedur e use d a t th e stat e an d federa l levels . 1

### 2 . Complainant s hav e chose n t o no t addres s specifi cpertinen t item s

presente d i n enumerate d paragraph s an d as suc h hav e evade d an d circumvente d thes e items , resultin g indubitabl yan d injuriousl yi n redundanc yi n th e proceedings . 3 . This i s anothe rexampl e o fho wcomplainant s hav e refuse d t o addres s thi s matte rrequirin g a mor e directe d metho d t o comply . 4 . M s William s reveale d tha t ther e wa s a polic ychang e o f1 4 C.F.R . par t 12 1 Appendence s I an d J tha t occurre d i n February2004 , requirin g al l A& P mechanic s t o b e o n a compan yspecifi ccompan ydru g program . 5 . M s William s di d no t provid e th e specifi ctrainin g wit h regar d t o ho wt o fin d th e regulations , directl ycit e th e specifi cregulatio n changes , cit e th e complianc e procedures , method s o fcomplianc e o ro fa notificatio n syste m simila rt o th e standar d FA Aoperations , maintenanc e an d avioni cprotocols . 6 . MR H wa s no t notifie d o fthi s polic ychang e an d eve n mor e unsettling , th e FA Amaintenanc e inspecto rGerr yHenninge rfo rMRH , als o wa s no t awar e an d wa s therefor e unabl e t o infor m MR H o fthi s chang e durin g th e 5 yea rplu s perio d tha t h e frequentl yinspecte d th e MR H aircraft , locate d a t Lehig h Valle y Internationa l Airport (ABE ) an d acros s th e stree t fro m th e Allentow n FSDO . 7 . FA AOfficer , Fran k

Allota , th e operation s inspecto ro fMR H fo r7 years wa s no t awar e o fthi s polic ychange . 8 . I n fac t non e o fth e managemen t personne l a t th e Allentow n FSD O wer e informe d o fth e regulatio n chang e durin g tha t 5 yea rperio d as well . 2 -

### 9 . Th e manage ro fth e Allentow n FSDO , M rWadswort h di d no t kno wo f

th e requiremen t t o hav e a mechani co n th e companie s specif cmonitorin g program . 10 . Wit h al l th e inspector s frequentl ygoin g ove rth e record s o fMR H fo r years , wh ywa s i t n o on e kne wabou t thi s chang e i n regulation ? 11 . Woul d on e b e le d t o honestl ybeliev e tha t complianc e procedure s wer e met ? Answe rYes . 12 . I n Apri l o f2004 , MR H underwen t a Dru g an d Alcoho l progra m inspectio n b yVincen t Roots afte rth e ne wregulatio n ha d change d an d n o significan t discrepancie s wer e cite d (Exhibi t 1) . 13 . M rRoots di d no t infor m MR H tha t th e regulatio n concernin g al l mechanic s bein g o n th e specifi ccompanie s dru g progra m ha d changed . I t wa s apparen t tha t al l th e FAA' s ow n dru g abatemen t personne l a s well , wer e no t informe d o fttiei row n i n tious e regulatio n change . 14 . M rRoots di d no t mentio n o rprovid e instructio n o rtrainin g regardin g referencin g regulation s tha t wer e no t readil yapparen t o rclearl ywritte n i n th e complianc e statemen t o roperationa l specifications , di d no t recommen d complianc e procedure s o ro fa notificatio n syste m tha t wa s i n place , tha t woul d allo wo renhanc e compliance , simila rt o FA Aoperations , maintenanc e an d avionic s protocols . 15 . Complainant s agree d tha t th e specifi cregulation s wer e no t containe d withi n th e operatio n specifications , bu t locate d somewher e i n a 3 -s

- ! I ! i 3 

# i E 

### I ' Federa l Register' .

16 . Wer e th e par t 12 1 appendence s I an d J liste d i n th e mos t commo n FA Areference , namel yth e Federa l Aviatio n Regulations/Aeronautica l Informatio n Manual ? Answe rNO . 16 . I fi t wa s locate d o n a Federa l Registe rwh ywa s i t th e FAA s ow n inspector s wer e no t awar e o fit ? 17 . Wer e th e regulation s reference d wit h locatio n specificit yi n th e o p specs ? No . 18 . Therefore , ther e wer e severa l factor s cloudin g th e clarit yan d ful l disclosur e o fthes e regulations , sinc e regulation s wer e no t cleari ycontained , listed , spelle d ou t o ri n a forthrigh t manne reviden t withi n th e signe d of f complianc e statemen t an d operationa l specifications , thereb yhidden , conceale d an d encouragin g violation , rathe rtha n effectiv e complianc e i n th e spiri t o fsafety . 18 . I fn o notificatio n proces s wa s i n plac e di d th e o p spec s referenc e ho wfrequentl yt o chec k fo rchanges ? Answe rNo . 19 . Di d th e drug/alcoho l monitorin g proces s follo wth e sam e procedure s as th e maintenanc e an d operation s procedure s fo rcompliance ? Answe rNo . 20 . D o th e operationa l specification s spel l ou t al l th e term s fo r complianc e withou t referenc e t o outsid e sources ? Answe rYes .

' Complainant s Respons e t o Motio n t o Quasti , pag e 4

## i n 21 . I fa operationa l specificatio n is change d b yth e FAA , ar e th e o p

spec s rewritte n b yth e inspector , give n t o th e operato ran d th e operato ris require d t o authoriz e tha t h e agree s t o thes e change s b ysignatur e authorization ? Answe rYes . 22 . I s i t unreasonabl e t o believ e tha t i t follow s suit e tha t th e drug/alcoho l monitorin g proces s woul d operat e i n th e sam e forthrigh t manner ? Answe rYes . 23 . D o th e abatemen t officer s expec t th e operator s t o rando m an d periodicall ysearc h th e Federa l Registr yfo runknow n changes ? Apparentl yYes . 24 . I fn o notificatio n proces s o rdirectio n t o specifi cchange s tha t too k place , woul d th e operato rb e require d t o compar e sid e b ysid e hundred s o fon lin e regulation s wit h ol d regulation s t o discove ra change ? Answe rapparentl y Yes . 25 . Woul d thi s b e a tediou s exercise , pron e t o erro r? Answe rYes . 26 . Doe s sectio n A449- 1 tha t wa s signed , clearl yindicat e man yo fth e above ? Answe rNo . 27 . Was thi s documen t create d an d subsequentl ysigne d befor e th e chang e i n regulatio n too k place ? Answe rYes . 28 . Th e complainant s ar e therefor e tryin g t o hol d a n unreasonabl e leve l o fcomplianc e unde rth e state d conditions . 29 . Th e complainant s ar e therefor e tryin g t o hol d th e responden t t o a highe rstandar d tha n thei row n FA Aofficers .

### 30 . This basi s alon e warrant s voidin g th e legitimac yo fth e complain t

an d demonstrate s maliciou s prosecution . 31 . I n th e steadfast , unyieldin g position , complainant s hav e refuse d t o I addres s thi s flawe d premis e fo rcompliance .

WHEREFORE , th e responden t pray s tha t thi s Honorabl e Court will : 1 . T o dismiss thi s cas e i n th e effor t o fjudicia l economy . Respectfull ySubmitted , Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC . Dat e %^ .U.S . Oepartmen t o fTransportatio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Operation s Specification s A449 . Antidru g an dAlcoho l Misus e Preventio nProgra m H Q Control : H Q Revision : 01/22/04

000 Th e certificate holde r

wh o operate s unde

r Titl e 1 4 Cod

e of Federa l Regulation s (CFR) Par

t 13 5 certifie s that

it will comply wit

hth e requirement s of

14 CF RPar t 12 1 Appendice s I an

dJ and 4 9 CF Rfai t 4 0 fo r it s Antidru g andAlcoho l Misus e PreventionProgram . Antidru g an

dAlcoho l Misus e Preventio nProgra mrecord s ar

e maintaine dan

davailabl e fo

r inspectio n b y th e FAA' s Dru g Abatement Complianc e andEnforcemen t Inspector s at

th e locatio nliste dinTabl e 1 below :

Address : Address : City : State : Zi p code : Tabl e 1

Locatio no f

Antidru g an dAlcoho l Misus e Preventio nProgra mRecords : 204 5 Westgate Driv e Bethlehem P A 1801 7 Telephon e Number : (610 ) 769-700 0

c . Limitation s andProvisions . (1 ) Antidru g andAlcoho l Misus e Preventio nProgra minspection s an

denforcemen

t activit y wil l b e conducte dexclxisivel

y b y th e Dru g Abatement

Division . All question s regardin g thi s progra m shouldb e directe dto th e Dru g Abatement Division . (2 ) Th e certificate holder

mus t implement

it s Antidru g an

dAlcoho l Misus e Preventio nProgram s fiill y i naccordanc e with1 4 CF

RPart 121 , Appendice s I an

dJ , an d4 9 CFRPar

t 40 . (3 ) Th e certificate holder

i s responsibl e fo

r ensurin g tha

t it s contractor s who perfor

msafety-sensitiv e wor k fo r th e certificate holder

are subjec t

t o Antidru g an

dAlcoho l Misus e Preventio nPrograms . (4 ) Th e certificate holder

i s responsibl e fo

r updatin g thi s operation s specificatio nwhe nany change s occur i nth e following : ' (a ) Locatio no r

phon e numbe

r where th e Antidru g an

dAlcoho l Misus e Preventio nRecord s are kep t (a s liste dinTabl e 1 above) . - (b ) I f th e certificate holder' s numb»o f safety^sensitive employee s goe s to 5 0 an dabove , o r fall s belo w 5 0 safety-sensitiv e employees . '-'-' ' ^ V . ' (5 ) Th e certificate holder

wit h5 0 or mor e employee s performing asafety-sensitiv e functiono n Januar y 1 o f th e calenda

r yea r mus t submit a nannua l repor t to th e Dru g Abatement

Divisio no f

the FAA . Th e certificate holder wit hfewe r tha n5 0 employee s performing asafety-sensitiv e function o nJanuar y 1 o f an y calenda r yea r mus t submit a nannua l repor t upo nreques t

o f th e Administrator , a s specifie dinth e regulations . Th e certificate holder

ha s fewe r tha n5 0 safety-sensitiv e employees .

Print Date : 8/15/200 5 A449- 1 M AND RHELICOPTERS LLC Certificat e No. : MR3A020K 

# FO R OFF m US

E ONL Y Pubi cavailabilit yt o b e determine d unde r5 US C 55 2

### I U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n Federa l Aviatio n Operation s Specification s Administratio n 1 . Issue db y th e Federal Aviatio nAdministration . 2 . Thes e Operation s Specification s are approve db y directio nof th e Administrator . ALOTTA , FRANK

Principa l Operation s Inspector

EA05 3 . Date Approval i s effective : 2/4/0 4 Amendmen t Nimiber : 0 4 . I hereb y accep t

an dreceiv e th e Operation s Specification s inthi s paragraph . Selig , Michae l B . Agen t for Servic e Date : 2/4/0 4

Print Date : 8/15/200 5 A449- 2 Certificate No. : MR3A020K M AN D RHELICOPTERS LL

C 

# FOI?OFFiClA l US

E ONL Y i^ibll cavailabilit yt o b e determine d unde r5 USC 55 2-' 1

5 n \



## - r 

# Q

1 1 o n,..,^. * k

Office of Aviatio n Medicin e 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , S.W . U.S. Departmen t Washington . D.C . 2059 1 o fTransportatb n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 

### AP R 2 200 4 Certified-Retur n Receip t Fil e Number : 2004EA91007 3 Dr . Michae l Selig , CE O M an d R Helicopter

s LLC 2045 Westgat e Drive , Suit e 10 1 Bethleliem , PA1801 7 Dea rDr . Seli g O n Marc h 3,2004 , yo u were informe d that th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA ) wa s investigatin g allege d violation s o f 4 9 CF R Par

t 4 0 an d 1 4 CF R Par

t 121 , Appendice s I an d J . Afte rreviewin g th e evidenc e compile d durin g th e inspectio n o f M an d R Helicopter s LL C o n Februar y26,200 4 an d th e documentatio n submitte d i n you rrespons e date d Marc h 18 , 2004 , i t appear s that M an d R Helicopter s LLC di d not compl ywit h al l provision s o f th e Antidru g an d Alcoho l Misus e Preventio n Program s a s detaile d below : 1 . M an d R Helicopter s LLC' s specime n collectio n procedure s d o no t meettti e requirement s o f4 9 CF R Par t 40 . Specifically : M an d R Helicopters LLC' s collecto r(Denes e Miller/CH S 02 ) faile d t o complet e Ste p 1 ite m E , Tes t t o B e Performed , o n th e Federa l Dru g Testin g Custodyan d Contro l Form . Corrective Action : A t th e inspectio n outbriefing , M an d R Helicopter s LL C agree d t o ensure th e collecto rwoul d complet e Ste p 1 o n th e Federa l Dru g Testin g Custod yan d Contro l Form . I n th e respons e date d Marej h 18 , 2004 , M an d R Helicopter s LL C submitte d a copyof a n Erro r Correctio n Trainin g Checklis t fro m Clinica l Laboratories , Inc . documentin g trainin g fo rDenes e Miller . 2 . M an d R Helicopter s LLC' s breatl i alcoho l testin g procedure s d o no t mee t th e requirement s o f4 9 CF R Par t 40 . Specifically : M an d R Helicopters LLC' s Breat h Alcoho l Technicia n (Denes e Miller/CH S 02 ) faile d t o complete Ste p 1 ite m C , th e Designate d Employe rRepresentative , o n th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n Alcoho l Testin g Form . Corrective Action : At th e inspectio n outbriefing , M an d R Helicopter s LL C agree d t o immediatel yensure tha t th e Breat h Alcoho l Technicia n woul d complet e Ste p 1 o f th e Alcoho l Testin g Form . I n th e respons e date d Marc h 18 , 2004 , M an d R Helicopter s LL C submitte d a cop yofa n Erro rCorrectio n Trainin g Checklist fro m Clinica l Laboratories , Inc . documentin g trainin g fo rDenes e Miller . 

### <5A M ^^ 1 ^ ^ 3 . lU I an d R Helicopter s LL C faile d t o maintai n record s a s require d b y4 9 CF R Part 40 .

Specifically : 

# ! J / M an d R Helicopter s LLC' s laborator

yfaile d transmi t th e employe rspecifi caggregat e statistica l summar

yfo r200 3 t o th e employe ro n a semi-annua l basis . Corrective Action : At th e inspectio n outbriefing , M an d R Helicopter s LL C agree d t o immediatel yensure th e la b wil l sen d statistica l summarie s fo r2003 . I n th e respons e date d Marc h 18 , 2004 , M an d R Helicopter s LL C submitte d a copie s o faggregat e statistica l summarie s fo r200 3 fro m LabCorp . Thi s i s t o confir m that yo u have satisfactoril ycorrecte d th e above issues . W e hav e give n consideratio n t o al l availabl e fact s an d conclude d that thes e issue s d o not warran t lega l enforcemen t action . I n lie u ofsuc h action , we are issuin g thi s letter , whic h wil l be mad e a matte ro f record . W e expec

t that i n th e future M an d R Helicopter s LLC' s Antidru g an d Alcoho l Misus e Preventio n Program s wil l b e i n complianc e wit h applicabl e regulations . Sincerely , Vincen t O . Roots Inspector , Compliance an d Enforcemen t

^s- ^

### Michae l Selig , MD , FACC , CFI- H

281 6 Orefiel d Roa d Allentown , PA . 18104 ;-*RTMENTO F w'n;/- U ll,.| \ 

### rrLPATiON S D 0 - -^ C 

### U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Laur a Ponto , Latony a William s Complainant s M & R Helicopters , LLC . Responden t Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Docket : 2010-121 1

RESPONDENT'

S REPL YT O COMPLAINANTS ANSWER S T O THE MOTIO N T

O COMPE L DISCOVER

YAN D NE

WMAHE R AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE L B . SELIG , MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (non-existen t sinc e 2009 ) who m aver s an d file s th e followin g repl yt o MOTIO N t o COMPE L DISCOVER Yo finformatio n requeste d o fLatony a William s an d Laur a Ponta , Esq . pas t th e 3 0 da yperio d accordin g t o Rul e 13.22 0 (d) . 1 . Complainant s hav e no t provide d an yo fth e discoverie s requeste d i n prio rdocuments . 2 . Responden t ha s requeste d forma l evidenc e fo rdate s o fservice , sinc e i t ha s alread ybee n show n tha t draf t date s o n document s as usuall y 1

### ; | severa l day s earlie rfro m actua l sen/ic e dates , canno t b e truste d an d therefor e l l objectiv e signe d date s o fservic e ar e required .

3 . Arevie wo fth e EIR als o shows inconsistencie s o fth e dat e o n th e ; document s an d th e dat e o fdocumen t wa s actuall yreceived . Exhibi t on e

shows M s William' s lette rdraf t dat e o fAugus t 14 , 200 9 an d a Certifie d Mai l retur n I ; receip t requeste d confirmatio n day s 5 day s later . This wa s th e onl ymai l

authorizatio n provided . This therefor e warrant s releas e o fth e repeatedl y requeste d objectiv e certifie d mai l receipt s o fsigne d validatio n o factua l serve d dates , instea d o fusin g othe rsubjectiv e information . 4 . Complainant s reference d §13.2 1 l(d)-Dat e o fService . Ther e are severa l method s listed . B

ydefinition , sinc e complainan t selecte d signator ydelivery confirmation , b ymean s o fsigne d retur n receipt , thi s represent s th e mos t accepted , reliabl e an d mos t objectiv e dat e o fservice . Complainant s wen t t o extr a taxpayers ' expens e a t tripl e th e cos t t o clearlyvalidat e an d ensure th e tru e deliverydate ; thi s supersede s othe rsubjectiv e metho d tha t relie s o n hearsay . Base d o n th e abov e discrepancies , th e state d date s o n th e document s b yth e complainant s canno t b e truste d an d th e requeste d stric t proo fb e provided . 5 . Complainant s argu e tha t providin g reference d document s i s no t standar d practice , howeve rstandar d practic e include s som e for m o fsummary o rquotation s o fpertinen t section s t o b e provided . Sometime s larg e section s o f discussion s ar e provided . Complainant s hav e mad e n o o rscan t effor t t o provid e an yproo fo fevidenc e an d appea ronl yconcerne d wit h evasiv e an d 2 -conclusionar ytactics . 6 . I n regar d t o M s Ponto' s spoliatio n an d redactio n o f altere d documents , no t eve n a referenc e t o th e kin d o f withholdin g wa s provide d an d thereb yquestioned . Bein g i t i s he rdepartmen t tha t acte d i n thi s manner , i t i s fo r he rt o provid e th e proo ft o substantiat e tha t thi s spoliatio n i s warrante d whe n questioned .

7 , Therefore , i n th e lette ro f Octobe r27 , 2010 , i t wa s requeste d t o provid e th e referenc e o fJordo n vDepartmen t o f Justic e tha t M s Pont o cite d i n he rcorrespondence . 8 . I n th e lette ro fOctobe r27 , 2010 , i t wa s requeste d t o provid e th e referenc e fo rpolicie s o n disclosur e restrictions . 9 . I n th e lette ro fNovembe r24 , 2010 , th e abov e item s wer e requeste d a secon d time . WHEREFORE , th e responden t pray s tha t thi s Honorabl e Cour t wil l eithe rdismis s th e cas e o n th e basi s o fviolatin g Rul e 13.22 0 (d ) o rcompe l th e partie s Latony a William s an d Laur a Pont o t o produc e th e requeste d documents . Respectfull ySubmitted , Michae l B . Selig , MD , FACC . \ - ^tDat e^ U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 170 1 Columbi a Avenu e Colleg e Park , G A3033 7

Certifie d Mai l - Retur n Receip t Requeste d Augus t 14 , 2009 Fil e Number : 2009SO95043 4 Dr . Michae l B . Seli g Presiden t M an d R Helicopter s LL C 204 5 Westgat e Driv e Bethlehem , P A1801 7 Dea rDr . Selig : O n Jul y2 1 an d 23 , 2009 , w e inspecte d M an d R Helicopter s LLC' s dru g an d alcoho l testin g program s t o determin e complianc e wit h 4 9 CF R part 4 0 an d 1 4 CF R part 12 0 (formerl y1 4 CF R par t 121 , appendice s I an d J) . A s a resul t o f thi s inspection , th e followin g apparen t violation s wer e discovered : 1 . M an d R Helicopter s LL C di d no t determin e tha t Eugen e Mcintos h an d Edwar d Bake r(contractors ) wer e covere d unde ra FAA-mandate d dru g testin g progra m an d a n alcoho l misus e preventio n progra m prio rt o usin g thei rservices . :ONCURRENCE S tOUTIM a SYMBO L AAM-86 2

OAT E 08/14/200 9 ItOUTIN G SYMBOt .

ROUTIN G SYMBO L

ROUTIN G SYMBO L INITIALS/SI S 2 . M an d R Helicopter s LL C di d no t conduc t pre-employmentdru g test s an d receiv e verifie d negativ e tes t result s prio rt o hirin g Eugen e Mcintos h an d Edwar d Bake rt o perfor m safety-sensitiv e functions . Thi s lette ri s t o infor m yo u tha t thes e matter s ar e unde rinvestigatio n b yth e FAA . Yo u ma ydiscus s thes e matter s wit h m e o rsubmi t a writte n statement , o rboth , withi n 1 0 day s o freceivin g thi s letter . Pleas e contac t m e a t (404 ) 305-617 5 i fyou hav e question s abou t thes e matters . Awritte n statemen t shoul d includ e al l pertinen t fact s an d mitigatin g circumstance s tha t yo u believ e ma yhav e a bearin g o n thes e matters . Sen d you rwritte n statemen t to : Attention : Latony a Williams , AAM-86 2 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o fAerospac e Medicin e Dru g Abatemen t Divisio n 170 1 Columbi a Avenu e Colleg e Park , G A3033 7

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/heaclquarters_offices/avs/offices/aam/drug_alcohol / ittp://www.faa.gov/aDout/oTTic ( 

## FO R OFFICIA LUS

E ONL Y Pubi cavailabilit yt o b e determine d unde r5 US C 55 2 INITIALS/Si a LWIIIiam s

ROUTIN G SYMBO L

ROUTIN G SYMBO L

ROUTIN G SYMBO L

ROUTIN G SYMBO LSENDER : COMPLET E THI S SECTIO N

• Complete'item s 1,2 , an d 3 . Als o complet e ite m 4 I fRestricte d DeliveryI s desired . • Prin t you rnam e an d addres s o n th e revers e s o tha t w e ca n retur n th e car d t o you . • Attac h thi s car d t o th e bac k o fth e mallplece , o ro n th e frort t I fspac e permits . COMPLET E THI S SECTIO N O N DELIVER Y

1 . Artlci a Addrsssa d to : Dr . Michae l B . Seli g Presiden t IV I an d R Helicopter s LL C 204 5 Westgat e Drive Bethlehem , P A1801 7 3 . |Syvlc«1Vp e —^•^-='—^^ y Ptffertlfle d Ma

U O B(pros s t ^ D Reglstared O Retur n Receipt fo rMeichandls e ] n Insured Mal l • C.O.D . , 4 . Restricte d Oelivary

? (Bctm Fee

) DYa s 2 . Articl e Numtie r (Thansfe rim m servic

e /absj ) 70D 7 14^ D 000 2 375>4T55 M P S For m 3811 , Febmat y200 4 Domesti cRetur n Receipt 1025S5.O2-M-164 O i

UNITE D STATE S POSTA L SERVIC E First-Clas s Mai l Postag e & Fee s Pai d USP S Permi t No . G-1 0

UJ ' CT

) • Sender : Jeas e prin t you rname , address , an d ZiP+ 4

P'ederal Aviatio nAdministration- • • - Industr y Dru g &AlcQho l Program s - • • 170 1 Columbi aAvenu e Colleg e Park , G

A3033 7 i n thi s bo x

ATTN : AAM-862/Latonv aWilliams 

### '"^'''^"'"^f'"li'i>Hh,l,liM.i,„ri,iniiinuulliiin l



## FO R OFFICIA LUS

E ONL Y Publi cavailabilit yt o b e determine d unde r5 US C 55 2