alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-5713.

#### Lorenzo Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 935, 131 S. Ct. 338,

178 L. Ed. 2d 220,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7144.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
# 2022 DLA Hall of Fame inductee: Janet Price

/ Published Aug. 16, 2022
Fort Belvoir, VA, 
*Editor’s Note: This is one of six stories featuring 2022 DLA Hall of Fame inductees. A ceremony highlighting their contributions to the agency will be held Aug. 17 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex.*

Janet Price, formerly of Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, is a member of the 2022 DLA Hall of Fame.

Price retired in October 2015 as the director of procurement process support. In this role, she developed procurement policies and new business systems to increase efficiency for DLA and its military customers.

As deputy director of the Supplier Operations Directorate, Price bolstered DLA’s ability to support 3 million national stock numbers and more than 1,800 weapons systems with consumable parts. She was also responsible for over 800 acquisition workforce professionals who executed an average of 30,000 monthly contracting actions.

She led DLA Aviation’s implementation of a new Enterprise Business Management System as the agency gained additional missions under the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure decisions. The new system was used by three Air Force Logistics Complexes and three Navy Fleet Readiness Centers.

Price also headed a DLA-wide effort to reduce acquisition lead time and purchasing processes for consumable supply parts. Commonly referred to as Time-to-Award, the initiative benefited from Price’s leadership and ability to foster improvement in complex situations.

“Price’s exceptional leadership, expert knowledge of DOD procurement processes and policy, and ability to drive out complexity to provide better support for the warfighter has directly benefited DLA and DLA’s customers,” according to her nomination.

Her 30-year career began as a contract specialist in 1985 at the Defense General Supply Center. She was previously inducted into the DLA Aviation Hall of Fame.
#### In the Matter of Teddy Moore, Petitioner, v State of New York Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts, Respondent.

[47 NYS3d 910]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts to take action against an attorney in connection with her conduct in an action entitled *Moore v Guerra,*commenced by the petitioner in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 4895/10, and application by the petitioner, inter alia, for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding *(see*CPLR 7804 [b]; 506 [b]; *Matter of Pettus v Dudis,*82 AD3d 896 [2011]; *Matter of Taylor v Adler,*73 AD3d 937 [2010]).

Dillon, J.P., Roman, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ., concur.
No. 10-5137.

#### Jason E. Clinton, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 246,

178 L. Ed. 2d 164,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6960.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 591 F.3d 968.
# Picking up the PaCE at Troop Support

/ Published March 24, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support celebrated their second Pathways to Career Excellence program in-person graduation since the pandemic during a ceremony held March 22 in Philadelphia.

Forty-three employees graduated from the two-year training program designed for entry-level personnel to provide advancement in professional, administrative and technological careers within the organization.

DLA Troop Support Deputy Commander Kishayra Lambert expressed her admiration and gratitude to the graduates, who completed the program while the organization supported the nation’s COVID-19 response.

“You all are truly an exceptional group of individuals,” she said. “I say that, not only because of your completion of the PaCE program, but you all have the unique experience of beginning and finishing the program in the midst of a pandemic. Having to navigate a new job, with a new organization and for some, in a new city, all while we were in a maximum telework status is truly admirable.”

During the program, employees work full-time while receiving a salary and health benefits. They advance in their careers while performing on-the-job assignments, cross-training, rotational assignments and formal training.

“Over the past two years, the PaCE program has equipped you with the tools you need to successfully support the mission of DLA Troop Support and DLA Aviation,” she said. “And you have already made a difference. Whether it was working to clear backorders, supporting our Whole of Government pandemic response efforts, or working on special projects, your impact has already been made.”

DLA Training Career Management Division Chief Lashana Crone, who’s team oversees the program, congratulated the graduates, saying the training is demanding and a lot is expected from the employees during and after the program.

“The classes are challenging, and a lot of time and effort is put into getting through them,” she said. “We have high expectations of all our graduates, so the PaCE program is intended to be intense to build competencies for their job and to prepare them for a successful career in DLA.”

The end goal of the program is to build a broader perspective and comprehension of agency responsibilities and processes, Crone added. Of the 43 graduates, 26 are contracting specialists, eight are general supply specialists, five are resolution specialists and four are quality assurance specialists.

Lambert left the graduates with three charges to focus on over their careers: keep your passion, be innovative, and don’t be afraid to be great.

“Embrace the opportunities to step out of your comfort zone and venture into unfamiliar areas,” she said. “Look for places in the organization with gaps that you have the special expertise to fill and lean forward. Don’t sit back and wait because one thing that I have learned firsthand is that when you think nobody is watching, someone always is and you want to be at your best when that happens.”

To learn more about the PaCE program and working at DLA, click here.
# Millions of personal protective equipment arriving at DLA Distribution Susquehanna for FEMA’s COVID-19 response efforts

/ Published Aug. 6, 2020
MECHANICSBURG, Pa., 
The Defense Department’s lead agency for logistics is processing, storing and shipping personal protective equipment for the Federal Emergency Management Agency as it assists hospitals dealing with rising COVID-19 infections across the country.

“Our logistics professionals at DDSP are committed to assisting FEMA and our other interagency partners to meet the needs of the nation during this critical time,” said Army Col. Trenton Conner, commander of DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania.

Employees at DDSP facilities in nearby Mechanicsburg received over 95 trucks and stored 4 million Tyvek isolation gowns in July. Additional gowns are still arriving and DDSP officials expect to start receiving face shields.

                In support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s fight against COVID-19, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, provides personal protective equipment sustainment support for the next six months in a climate controlled warehouse.                            Millions of personal protective equipment arriving at DLA Distribution Susquehanna for FEMA’s COVID-19 response efforts                            In support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s fight against COVID-19, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, provides personal protective equipment sustainment support for the next six months in a climate controlled warehouse.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Matthew MahoneyVIRIN: 200806-D-VQ057-0001

Distribution process workers have been receiving five deliveries daily since July 6 and can unload one truck in 20 minutes, said Eric Minor, a DDSP supervisor. Between deliveries, the team categorizes and palletizes the gowns for storage and future shipping. FEMA employees are working alongside the DLA Distribution team, receipting and processing the items electronically.

DDSP will provide sustainment support for the next six months as FEMA determines when and where the equipment will be shipped.
No. 09-11216.

#### Shanel Ann Stasz, Petitioner v. Rosendo Gonzalez, Trustee.

562 U.S. 868, 131 S. Ct. 161,

178 L. Ed. 2d 96,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6694.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 348 Fed. Appx. 233.
[Cite as Miller v. Mellot , 2020-Ohio-237.]

A tty. Kristopher Justice, and Atty. Daniel Corcoran, Theisen Brock, 424 Second Street, Marietta, Ohio 45750, for Plaintiffs- Appellants and

A tty. Scott Eickelberger, Atty. David Tarbert, and Atty. Ryan Linn, Kincaid, Taylor, & Geyer, 50 North Fourth Street, P.O. Box 1030, Zanesville, Ohio 43702, for DefendantsA ppellees. 

## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MONROE COUNTY

ALLEN B. MILLER ET AL.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. ELBERT MELLOTT ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.

OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Case No. 18 MO 0004

Motion for Reconsideration

BEFORE: David A. D’Apolito, Cher y l L. Waite, Carol Ann Robb, Jud g es.

JUDGMENT: Denied.– 2 –

Case No. 18 MO 0004 Dated: Januar y

24, 2020

PER CURIAM.
{¶1} On October 9, 2019, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Allen B. Miller, Mat ilda J. Miller, Craig M. Miller, Tina E. Miller, Brenda D. Thomas, and Kevin M. Thomas filed a second application for reconsideration pursuant to App.R. 26(A)(1). O n September 30, 2019, we granted Appellant’s original application for reconsideration in order to clarify our opinion and judgment entry issued on February 6, 2019, Miller v. Mellott, 7th Dist. Monroe No. 18MO0004, 2019-Ohio-504, 130 N.E.3d 1021, but ultimately affirm ed the trial court’s dismissal of Appellants’ Marketable Title Act (“MTA”) claim. Miller v. Mellott, 7th Dist. Monroe No. 18MO0004, 2019-Ohio-4084. Defendants-Appellees, Bett y Mellott, Mary Hill, Paul Hill, Kathie Hill, Marcia Phelps, Debe Owens, Lawrence Hil l, Patricia Hill, Terrence Hill, Jody Hill, and Patricia Herndon, filed their opposition b rief to the second application on October 17, 2019. Appellants’ reply was filed on October 23 , 2019. {¶2} An application for reconsideration must call to the attention o f the appellate court an obvious error in its decision or point to an issue tha t was raised to the court but was inadvertently either not considered at all or not fully con sidered. Juhasz v. Costanzo
, 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 99-C.A.-294, 2002 WL 206417, (Feb. 1, 20 02). In our September 30th judgment entry, we explained that the void in the post-sev erance/pre-root deed history in the record prohibited us from concluding that an exc eption in the root of title deed was a general reference to an interest created in a prior deed. {¶3} We have previous recognized that App.R. 26(A) does not provide for second or successive reconsiderations of our final judgment in an appeal. State v. Wellington , 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 14 MA 115, 2015-Ohio-2754, ¶ 6; State v. Dew , 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 08 MA 62, 2014-Ohio-4042, ¶ 6; State v. Davis , 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 10 MA160 (Jan. 12, 2012 J.E.). The Ohio Supreme Court reac hed the same conclusion with respect to successive applications to reopen un der App.R. 26(B). State v. Peeples , 73 Ohio St.3d 149, 1995-Ohio-36, 652 N.E.2d 717 (1995). Acc ordingly, Appellants’ second application for reconsideration is denied.– 3 –

Case No. 18 MO 0004 JUDGE DAVID A. D’APOLITO

JUDGE CHERYL L. WAITE

JUDGE CAROL ANN ROBB

NOTICE TO COUNSEL
This document constitutes a final judgment entry.
No. 09-11497.

#### Gary Don Robinson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 884, 131 S. Ct. 210,

178 L. Ed. 2d 126,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6816.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Employees required to report foreign travel
 
  By DLA Installation Management, Security and Emergency Services
  Employees going on temporary duty to foreign countries must do more than just complete travel orders in the Defense Travel System. The Defense Department’s Foreign Clearance Guide outlines requirements employees must complete before traveling. The requirements vary by combatant command and country, and they change continually based on current threats and COVID-19 conditions. The DoD FCG is broken down by combatant command and the countries in each. Requirements for some countries include: •    Country clearance in the Aircraft and Personnel Automated Clearance System; 
•    Antiterrorism Level I within 12 months before travel;
•    Isolated Personnel Report training within 12 months before travel;
•   Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape training within 36 months before travel; 
•    An Individual Antiterrorism Plan in some instances; and
•    A travel threat briefing from an antiterrorism officer. Requirements must be met 45-60 days before travel. The lead time for completing country clearance in APACS varies by country and ranges from 21-45 days. All DTS orders for foreign travel are routed to the local antiterrorism officer, who certifies that the traveler has received a travel threat briefing for each country. Employees with a top secret or sensitive compartmented information clearance have additional requirementsfor official or unofficial travel and should consult their special security officer for guidelines. All employees traveling to a foreign country for pleasure are also encouraged to receive a travel threat briefing from their local ATO. The State Department’s website includes travel alerts and warnings for countries with an elevated threat. The site also has information on embassies and consulates; entry, exit and visa requirements; local laws and special circumstances; and health and medical facilities for every country. The State Department encourages U.S. citizens to enroll in the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program before traveling to receive embassy alerts and be contacted in the event of a natural disaster, civil unrest or family emergency. Enrollment can also help family or friends reach employees in an emergency.
Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2013 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: February 14, 2013



By: /s/Richard L. Feinstein

Richard L. Feinstein

Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 9000-0033]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request Entitled Contractor's 
Signature Authority

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of request for comments regarding an extension to an 
existing OMB clearance (9000-0033).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 
Secretariat will be submitting to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a currently 
approved information collection requirement concerning Contractor's 
Signature Authority. The clearance currently expires on September 30, 
1998.

DATES: Comments may be submitted on or before August 17, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Nelson, Federal Acquisition 
Policy Division, GSA, (202) 501-1900.

ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other 
aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for 
reducing this burden, to: FAR Desk Officer, OMB, Room 10102, NEOB, 
Washington, DC 20503, and a copy to the General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat (MVRS), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035, 
Washington, DC 20405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Purpose

    Entities doing business with the Government must identify those 
persons who have the authority to bind the principal. This information 
is needed to ensure that Government contracts are legal and binding. 
The information is used by the contracting officer to ensure that 
authorized persons sign contracts.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Public reporting burden for this collection of information is 
estimated to average 1 minute per completion, including the time for 
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
collection of information.
    The annual reporting burden is estimated as follows: Respondents, 
4,800; responses per respondent, 1; total annual responses, 4,800; 
preparation hours per response, .017; and total response burden hours, 
82.

Obtaining Copies of Proposals

    Requester may obtain a copy of the justification from the General 
Services Administration, FAR Secretariat (MVRS), 1800 F Street, NW, 
Room 4035, Washington, DC 20405, telephone (202) 501-4755. Please cite 
OMB Control No. 9000-0033, Contractor's Signature Authority, in all 
correspondence.

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
Sharon A. Kiser,
FAR Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 98-16086 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-P
No. 09-11157.

#### Steve Badue, Petitioner v. Cheryl Chun Meegan, Judge, Superior Court of California, Sacramento County, et al.

562 U.S. 864, 131 S. Ct. 149,

178 L. Ed. 2d 90,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6537.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
* Judge King did not participate in consideration of this case. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (1994). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6381
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PAUL ANDERSON ROBERTS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-81, CA-97-517-2) Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999 Before WIDENER and KING, * Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Anderson Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Paul Anderson Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Roberts, Nos. CR-96-81; CA-97-517-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 4, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 10-5136.

#### Jose Miguel Perez, Petitioner v. Michael A. Georgelis, et al.

562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 246,

178 L. Ed. 2d 164,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6923.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 351 Fed. Appx. 788.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Matthew Thomas, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 573]

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), both imposed January 19, 2016, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The sentences imposed were not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Cohen, Roman and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dean E. Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Dean E. Miller
------------------

Dean E. Miller
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2007

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re Group
Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.