alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Latest survey confirms DLA Aviation’s workplace culture continues to improve

/ Published Aug. 27, 2021
Richmond, Va., 
When Defense Logistics Agency Aviation sets out to create a culture of high performance, the results speak for themselves.

To prove lasting impact and ensure specific targets are met, DLA has relied on the Denison Survey since 2003 to illustrate its current success and prepare for changes going forward. This year’s results confirm DLA Aviation’s ongoing success with demonstrated improvement in all survey areas.

Crystal Holmes, deputy division chief, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Supplier Operations Directorate, explained the survey’s purpose.

“The primary goal of the Denison Survey is to assess and measure DLA Aviation’s progress toward achieving a high-performing culture with optimum results. The results are used to shape future change initiatives going forward,” Holmes, who was also on the DLA Aviation culture team, said.

DLA Aviation performance was measured against four quadrants built into the survey: Adaptability, Mission, Consistency and Involvement. These quadrants are illustrated in a color wheel.

“By collecting data from the survey, [DLA] Aviation is able to gauge these areas of alignment and discord within the organization,” she said.

This year’s survey results showed improvements in all focus areas, with an average increase of 10 points. One focus area, Creating Change, showed the greatest improvement—up 16 points from a score of 67 in 2018 to a score of 83 in 2020.

“I’m certainly no specialist; however, I attribute this positive increase to the rapid response [DLA] Aviation [leaders] had regarding the pandemic and other events that occurred in 2019 and 2020 leading up to the survey being issued to staff,” Holmes said.

DLA Aviation’s survey results are not only compared to other units within DLA, but with all private businesses and federal organizations participating in the Denison Survey—a total of over 1,000 organizations.

“When I say we score 99% in an area, this is compared to all other organizations,” she said.

Following the survey results, comments are shared with DLA Aviation directors as the group transitions from survey analysis to top-level directorate and division focus. These senior leaders will build their own, smaller culture teams to address action planning for focus areas.

Strategic direction and intent measure employees’ understanding of how they fit into the overall DLA picture. Customer focus examines how well the customer base understands what DLA Aviation can do to support warfighter readiness. Capability development measures a ready workforce, improved coordination and decision making, the empowerment of team leads in the decision-making process, and the level of trust between leadership and employees in decision making.

For DLA Aviation specifically, consistency with cross-functional coordination and integration looks at employees’ increased knowledge of other directorates and their role in warfighter support.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan’s Foods, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and wehave:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisreport (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisannual report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, includingany corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.   Date: December 22, 2004 /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir         Leonard R. Stein-Sapir       Chairman of the Board,       Chief Executive Officer
19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MONARCH
CEMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,824,902
<SECURITIES>                                 7,954,052
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,450,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                   422,000
<INVENTORY>                                 20,936,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,681,017
<PP&E>                                     115,319,915
<DEPRECIATION>                              79,649,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,246,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,890,568
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,310,683
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,794,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,246,472
<SALES>                                     22,388,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,388,688
<CGS>                                       18,784,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,784,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,666,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                   600,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,066,777
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,066,777
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Mexco  Energy  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Nicholas  C.  Taylor,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m or
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  August 12, 2002                    /s/ Nicholas C. Taylor
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 10-50.

#### Derek J. Lackey, Petitioner v. Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

562 U.S. 891, 131 S. Ct. 261,

178 L. Ed. 2d 139,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6236.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 80.
No. 12-8627.

#### Rice *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
# MICHIGAN-'i^A-Jlim i

. . A ] .-'.en,-. - COMMERC EBAN K

February9 , 201 2 Docke t Managemen t Facilit y U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e S E Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Su n CountrySlo t Exemptio n - Docke t Numbe rFAA-2012-008 9 Ladie s an d Gentlemen : Su n CountryAirline s ha s requeste d a n exemptio n fro m th e slo t limite d fo rRonal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airpor t (DCA ) se t fort h i n § 93.12 3 (a) , t o permi t th e FAAt o creat e ai r carrie rslot s durin g certai n limite d hour s fo rSu n Country' s use . Th e propose d ai rcarrie r slot s woul d replac e tw o slo t exemption s unde rDO TOrde r2010-12-1 6 awarde d t o Su n Country . O n January6 , 2012 , th e Unite d State s Court o fAppeal s fo rth e Distric t o f Columbi a Circui t vacate d th e DO TOrder , an d Su n Countrywil l los e it s existin g servic e betwee n DC Aan d Lansing' s Capita l Regio n Internationa l Airport . Specifically , Su n Countrydesire s on e dail yslo t durin g eac h o f th e 100 0 an d 110 0 hours . Th e propose d exemptio n woul d permi t Su n Countryt o continu e operatin g it s existin g service s an d avoi d a n inequitabl e resul t o fth e Court' s order . A s a n employe e o fCapito l Bancor p Limited , i t i s convenien t t o hav e a n airport withi n th e Greate rLansin g are a tha t provide s trave l servic e t o ou remployees , client s an d families . Personally , th e fligh t int o Ronal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airpor t (DCA ) i s a wonderfu l servic e t o m yfamil ya s w e trave l frequentl yt o visi t ou rne wgrandchild . Th e Su n CountryDC Aservic e i s essentia l t o th e economi cgrowt h o f th e Greate rLansin g Region . Th e dail yservic e i s th e onl ylarg e aircraf t (737-800 ) servic e t o Washingto n Reaga n Airport , i n th e stat e o fMichiga n outsid e o fDetroit . Prio rt o Su n Country , th e regiona l communit yha d requeste d th e introduction o f thi s servic e fro m numerou s othe r airlin e operator s withou t success . Accordingly , i t i s critica l tha t th e FA Atak e th e necessary step s t o ensur e th e continuatio n o f th e Su n Countryslot s a t th e establishe d fligh t time s i n suppor t o fGreate rLansing' s busines s an d economi cgrowth .

Membe r P.O . Bo x 1303 7 • Lansing , M I 48901-303 7 *^ Y FDI C tel : 517.374.533 3 • fax : 517.267.461 0 • www.michigancommercebank.co mife nYou rimmediat e approva l o fthi s exemption , s o tha t Su n Countryca n begi n t o ente rflight s

schedule s fo rsal e fo rth e balance o f 2012 , wil l b e greatl yappreciated .

Bruc e Thoma s Presiden t o fBan k

Operation s
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31811-31812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15363]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Combined Arts Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-462), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Panel, Media Arts Section A (Creation & 
Presentation/Planning & Stabilization Categories) to the National 
Council on the Arts will be held on June 22-24, 1998. The panel will 
meet from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on June 23, and from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 
p.m. on June 24, in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506. A portion of this 
meeting, from 9:00 to 10:30 p.m. on June 24, will be open to the public 
for a policy discussion on field needs, Leadership/Millennium 
initiatives, and guidelines.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 
on June 22, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on June 23, and from 10:30 a.m. 
to 3:00 p.m. on June 24, are for the purpose of Panel review, 
discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on applications for 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the 
determination of the Chairman of May 14, 1998, these sessions will be 
closed

[[Page 31812]]

to the public pursuant to subsection (c) (4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and, if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal 
employee in attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of Access Ability, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-
TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, 
National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-
5691.

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 98-15363 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
No. 10-5035.

#### Raul Gonzalez, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 900, 131 S. Ct. 231,

178 L. Ed. 2d 153,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6212.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

*154Same case below, 592 F.3d 675.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Morgans Foods, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: September 30, 2009
    /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. HignettSenior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


The National Center for Environmental Health Meeting

    The National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) of the Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: 1998 National Lead Grantee Conference: Linking Health, 
Housing, Environment.
    Times and Dates: 6 p.m.-9 p.m., June 21, 1998; 9:00 a.m.-6 p.m., 
June 22, 1998; 8 a.m.-5:15 p.m., June 23, 1998; 8:30 a.m.-11:45 
a.m., June 24, 1998.
    Place: Phoenix at Civic Plaza, 225 East Adams Street, Phoenix, 
Arizona 85004-2379, telephone 602/262-6225.
    Status: Open to the public, limited by space available.
    Purpose: The purpose of this meeting is to provide a forum to 
strengthen and enhance Federal grantee capacity to develop and 
implement cost effective programs by providing state-of-the-art 
program and technical information; building program management 
skills; and encouraging coordination and cooperation among grantees 
and the public and private sectors.
    Matters to be Discussed: Workshops and topical tables on 
specific program issues will include Managing Effective Grants; 
Remodeling and Renovation: Protecting Workers and Families; Lead 
Hazard Control and Rehabilitation; Partnering with Community-based 
Organizations; Identifying and Testing Lead Hazards; HUD Guidelines; 
Core Public Health Functions; Waste Management; Outreach and Public 
Education on Lead Issues; EPA-related Certification and Regulations; 
Title X Status Report; Managed Care and Medicaid Issues; NHANES III-
Part 2; Insurance and Liability; CDC Screening Guidelines; Lead 
Effects Research; Healthy Homes; Laboratory Techniques and 
Technologies; and Media Perspectives.
    Workshops and topical tables are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Barbara Nelson, Lead 
Poisoning Prevention Branch, Division of Environmental Hazards and 
Health Effects, NCEH, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, M/S F-42, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 770/488-7272.

    Dated: June 10, 1998.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 98-15928 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2250

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit tax-exempt financing

of certain transportation facilities.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit

tax-exempt financing of certain transportation facilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING OF CERTAIN TRANS4 PORTATION FACILITIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 142 of

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exempt

7 facility bonds) is amended—

8 (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para9 graph (3), and
2

•S 2250 IS

1 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the follow2 ing new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(2) RELATED TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES.—

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Transportation facili5 ties (including trackage and related rail facili6 ties, but not rolling stock) shall be treated as

7 facilities described in paragraph (2) of sub8 section (a) if at least 80 percent of the use of

9 the facilities (determined on an annual basis) is

10 to be in connection with the transport of cargo

11 to or from a facility described in such para12 graph (without regard to this paragraph).

13 ‘‘(B) GOVERNMENTAL OWNERSHIP RE14 QUIREMENT.—In the case of transportation fa15 cilities described in subparagraph (A), sub16 section (b)(1) shall apply without regard to sub17 paragraph (B)(ii) thereof.’’

18 (b) CHANGE IN USE.—Section 150(b) of the Internal

19 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to change in use of facili20 ties financed with tax-exempt private activity bonds) is

21 amended by adding at the end the following new para22 graph:

23 ‘‘(7) CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES.—

24 In the case of any transportation facility—
3

•S 2250 IS

1 ‘‘(A) with respect to which financing is

2 provided from the proceeds of any private activ3 ity bond which, when issued, purported to be a

4 tax-exempt bond described in paragraph (2) of

5 section 142(a) by reason of section 142(c)(2),

6 and

7 ‘‘(B) with respect to which the require8 ments of section 142(c)(2) are not met,

9 no deduction shall be allowed under this chapter for

10 interest on such financing which accrues during the

11 period beginning on the 1st day of the taxable year

12 in which such facility fails to meet such require13 ments and ending on the date such facility meets

14 such requirements.’’

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

16 this section shall apply to obligations issued after the date

17 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
No. 10-5250.

#### Larry Edward Hendricks, Petitioner v. South Carolina Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 911, 131 S. Ct. 265,

178 L. Ed. 2d 175,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6989.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.