alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EMS Week spotlight: Sue Potashnik

/ Published May 25, 2023
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
*Editor’s Note: May 21-27 is National Emergency Medical Technician Week. This year’s theme is “Where Emergency Care Begins.” This is a part of a series of spotlights highlighting firefighter/paramedics who serve as DLA’s first responders in emergencies.*

**Your name:** Sue Potashnik

**Job title and duty location:** Firefighter/paramedic for DLA Land and Maritime in Columbus, Ohio

**What inspired you to become a firefighter/paramedic?** I started my career as a heavy equipment mechanic in the Marine Corps, but that was not my true calling. I was given the opportunity to cross-train to crash fire rescue after my initial four years. I have always felt the desire to help people in their time of need. 

**When did you join DLA Fire and Emergency Services and what did you do before you got here?** I joined DLA Fire and Emergency Services in April 9. Before that I was a firefighter/paramedic at Fort Jackson in Columbia, South Carolina.

**Describe your typical shift in 2-3 sentences.**First and most importantly, every morning we check out vehicles and equipment to ensure they are in a ready and working state. Every day we try and do some kind of training, either emergency medical or fire related. If anyone calls for help, we assist them in any way that we can.

**Is there a moment you’ve encountered on duty that stands out?** Knowing when I have contributed to a positive outcome always stands out. That is just a feeling of accomplishment that you don’t always get in other careers. 

**What’s the hardest part of your job and why?** Not always being able to help as much as you would like can really weigh heavy on a person. We are the type of people who need to see results, and when the result isn’t what you anticipated that can stick with you.  

**What do you like most about your job and why?** People call us when they don’t know how to solve their problems. This is when we get to use critical thinking and rely on our past experiences to solve the problem in the best way for the customer and the department. It takes a special person to be able to help someone at their worst time, and I love being that person. 

**How do you unwind after a shift?** I moved back to Ohio to help my parents in their advanced years. I spend most of my off-duty time with my friends and family; it helps keep me grounded and relaxed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0494

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DAVID ALAN SPAGNOLO, 

Defendant and Appellant, 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 30, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 16 2021

06/16/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0494
#### Rosales, Matter of, v Eugene J. Felice Landscaping

3d Dept: 144 AD3d 1206

denied
Exhibit 32.1

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



The undersigned, Sidney W. Emery Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of MTS Systems Corporation (the "Company"), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report").



The undersigned hereby certifies that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



Date: August 6, 2007



/s/ SIDNEY W. EMERY, Jr.Sidney W. Emery, Jr. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




---
#### New Greenwich Litig. Trustee, LLC v Citco Fund Servs. (Europe) B.V.

1st Dept: 145 AD3d 16

denied
The Great ShakeOut: what you can do to prepare for an earthquake
 
  By William Bullock, installation emergency manager, DLA Installation Management Richmond
  Emergencies can occur in the blink of an eye, with the impact ranging from temporary disruption of activities to a loss of an installation’s ability to perform its assigned missions. Employees receive warnings of approaching weather emergencies, such as blizzards, tornados, floods, etc., in time for them to take measures to minimize loss of life or property. However, there may be no warning signs when it comes to an earthquake. Although earthquakes are rare in Virginia, there is always the possibility. The Great ShakeOut drill started in Southern California in 2008 to educate the public on how to react in case of an earthquake. It’s now conducted internationally on the third Thursday of October. This year’s event takes place Oct. 19. There will be no physical drill conducted on Defense Supply Center Richmond this year due to the current COVID-19 environment, but information will be sent out via a system broadcast the day of the event. The Occupant Emergency Plan, found on the Defense Supply Center Richmond Employee Emergency Preparedness sharepoint webpage, outlines the following 1. **Actions you should take if you find yourself inside when an earthquake hits:** a. Drop to the ground; take cover by getting under a sturdy table or another piece of furniture; and hold on until the shaking stops. If there is not a table or desk near you, cover your face and head with your arms and crouch in an inside corner of the building. b. Stay away from windows, doors and anything that could fall, such as lighting fixtures or furniture. c. Stay inside until the shaking stops and it’s safe to go outside. Research has shown that most injuries occur when people inside buildings attempt to move to a different location inside the building or try to leave. **2.  Actions you should take if you find yourself outdoors when an earthquake hits:** a. Move away from buildings, streetlights, and utility wires. b. Once in the open, stay there until the shaking stops. The most significant danger exists directly outside buildings, near exits and alongside exterior walls. Ground movement during an earthquake is seldom the direct cause of death or injury. Christopher Bales, assistant chief of Fire and Emergency Medical Services, DLA Installation Management Richmond, recommends taking the following actions if stuck under debris: Your main goal should be attracting rescue workers and dogs to your location so they can help get you out. Loud noises from high pitch whistles or an air horn can cause the building to start collapsing again. 2.  If you can reach your cell phone or flashlight, you can create a signal to help speed up your rescue. Light can travel a long way and can be seen quite easily especially by dogs or robotic cameras. 3.  If you are stuck under a large object or a pile of debris, you should try to avoid any unnecessary movement
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb  | Mar | Apr | May  | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |      | W   |     |      |     |     |     |     |     | W   |     
|2022                                                                                                                              | W   |      | W   |     | W    |     |     |     |     |     |     |     
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |      |     |     | W    |     |     | W   | W   |     |     | 6.63
|2024                                                                                                                              |     | 5.63 |     |     | 5.41 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
DSD North-East wraps up 2021
 By Jeff Landenberger
  By the numbers, the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services North-East region had a great year: the team processed 500,061 receipts and reutilized 23,046 lines of material. But a successful year is more than just numbers. **Brian DeCarlo, wage grade supervisor with the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services at Columbus, Ohio operates a forklift inside one of the sites warehouses. During 2021 the site was authorized to convert one of their warehouses from long term storage to use in routine disposal operations.




A man operates a forklift inside a warehouse.
        MHE in the Buckeye state
            Brian DeCarlo, wage grade supervisor with the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services at Columbus, Ohio operates a forklift inside one of the sites warehouses. During 2021 the site was authorized to convert one of their warehouses from long term storage to use in routine disposal operations.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Jason Shamberger
                    
                    VIRIN: 210903-D-AU600-702**“We kept our people safe,” said Beth Ford, DLA Disposition Services North-East director. She said working through another year with COVID keeping her employees and their customers safe was a priority. “We operated straight through the pandemic, the whole year,” Ford said. “We did not have sites close due to COVID, we continued to provide full speed customer support.” While COVID did not close any sites, a transformation in how North-East will be providing customer support in the future did close sites.
“We received guidance to close 11 field offices by September 2022,” Ford said. “We already have eight of those sites closed this year.” While it was a big accomplishment to get the sites closed this year, she said it was hard at the same time. Closing sites impacts people.
She said that it became a big focus point for North-East to work with the people impacted and help them find new positions or explore other options including retirement. At the site in Columbus, Ohio, a DOD policy change had a major impact, Ford said. The site had a warehouse dedicated just to long-term storage. The policy change eliminated that. “We transformed that big warehouse into additional warehouse space for our Columbus operations for just doing routine disposal,” Ford said. “So they went from one big building to two and from 47 to 67 people that they are authorized to run that operation,” she added. “That will be a very big change in capability, a 43% increase in people and basically doubling the building to do the routine type of disposal we do.”
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

JONATHAN GUIJOSA, No. 08

- 19

- 00014

- CR

§

APPELLANT, Appeal from the

§

V. 371st District Court

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Tarrant County, Texas

§

APPELLEE. (TC# 1516287D )

§

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certifie d below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Felix Rodriguez, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 423]

— Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County (Buscaglia, J.), entered January 11, 2000, convicting defendant after a jury trial of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting *1360him after a jury trial of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]) and robbery in the second degree (§ 160.10 [1]) for robbing a gasoline station/food mart with two other men. Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contentions that Supreme Court did not adequately state the reasons for a juror’s disqualification and that defense counsel should have been permitted to ask questions of that juror to determine the scope of the juror’s misconduct *(see People v Albert,*85 NY2d 851, 852 [1995]; *People v Howze,*239 AD2d 895, 896 [1997], *lv denied*90 NY2d 940 [1997]). In addition, we note that the juror was disqualified upon defendant’s own motion and with defendant’s written consent *(see*CPL 270.35 [1]), and thus defendant has waived those contentions *(see People v Smith,*304 AD2d 364, 365 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 566 [2003]; *People v Woods,*238 AD2d 144 [1997], *lv denied*90 NY2d 912 [1997]).

Defendant also failed to preserve for our review his contention concerning the court’s charge on reasonable doubt and, in any event, that contention is lacking in merit *(see People v Saunders,*283 AD2d 523, 523-524 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 924 [2001]; *see also People v Antommarchi,*80 NY2d 247, 251-252 [1992], *rearg denied*81 NY2d 759 [1992]). We further conclude that the court properly instructed the jury that defendant’s flight was evidence of consciousness of guilt *(see People v Murray,*305 AD2d 301 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 623 [2003]; *People v Henry,*270 AD2d 936 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 905 [2000]; *see generally People v Yazum,*13 NY2d 302, 304-305 [1963], *rearg denied*15 NY2d 679 [1964]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his additional contention that the conviction is not supported by legally sufficient evidence because the descriptions of defendant given by the People’s witnesses were vague and contradictory *(see generally People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]) and, in any event, that contention lacks merit *(see People v Gray,*243 AD2d 648 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 873 [1997]). Finally, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]), defendant received meaningful representation *(see People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]), and the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Hayes, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Mark Marszalek, Appellant, v Tina Stanford, as the Chairwoman of the State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[59 NYS3d 432]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Parole dated June 1, 2015, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application to be released on parole, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Marx, J.), entered March 22, 2016, as, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Judicial review of a determination of the New York State Board of Parole (hereinafter the Parole Board) is narrowly circumscribed *(see Matter of Briguglio v New York State Bd. of Parole,*24 NY2d 21, 29 [1969]; *Matter of Esquilin v New York State Bd. of Parole,*144 AD3d 797, 797 [2016]; *Matter of Hardwick v Dennison,*43 AD3d 406, 407 [2007]; *Matter of Rhoden v New York State Div. of Parole,*270 AD2d 550, 551 [2000]). A Parole Board determination to deny an early release may be set aside only where it evinces “irrationality bordering on impropriety” *(Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]; *see Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000]). Further, while the Parole Board is required to consider the relevant statutory factors *(see*Executive Law § 259-i [2] [c]) in reaching its determination, it is not required to address each factor in its decision or accord all of the factors equal weight *(see Matter of LeGeros v New York*
      *774
      *State Bd. of Parole,*139 AD3d 1068, 1069 [2016]; *Matter of Thomches v Evans,*108 AD3d 724 [2013]; *Matter of Samuel v Alexander,*69 AD3d 861, 862 [2010]). In this case, the hearing record and the text of the subject determination establish that the requisite factors were properly considered by the respondent.

Since the petitioner failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating that the challenged determination was irrational, the Supreme Court correctly, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding *(see Matter of Marszalek v Stanford,*124 AD3d 665 [2015]; *Matter of Thomches v Evans,*108 AD3d at 724-725; *Matter of Samuel v Alexander,*69 AD3d at 862; *Matter of Hardwick v Dennison,*43 AD3d at 407).

Dillon, J.P., Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2395

AN ACT

To designate the United States Courthouse in Dehouse’’, and for other purposes. troit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Court-
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2395

AN ACT

To designate the United States Courthouse in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Courthouse’’, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2395 ES

1 SECTION. 1. THEODORE LEVIN FEDERAL BUILDING AND

2 COURTHOUSE.

3 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The courthouse facility lo4 cated at 231 West Lafayette, in Detroit, Michigan, shall

5 be known and designated as the ‘‘Theodore Levin Court6 house’’.

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

9 States to the courthouse facility referred to in subsection

10 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Theodore

11 Levin Courthouse’’.

Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day,

September 12), 1994.

Attest:

Secretary.
# DLA Distribution Korea celebrates Army promotion

/ Published June 8, 2023
CAMP CARROLL, South Korea , 
Army Staff Sgt. Siris A. Alma was promoted to the rank of Sgt. 1st Class during a May 12 promotion ceremony on the first floor of the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Korea warehouse.  

DLA Distribution Korea employees and other distinguished guests attended the ceremony. Additionally, the ceremony was streamed via Microsoft Teams and Facebook Live for family, close friends and others to view remotely.

Alma is a native of Aguadilla, Puerto Rico. She enlisted into the Army in January 2008 and attended Basic Combat Training at Ft. Jackson, South Carolina, followed by Advance Individual Training at Ft. Gregg-Adams, Virginia for the Military Occupational Specialty 92A, and Automated Logistic Specialist. Alma joined DLA Distribution Korea on March 9, as the Material Management non-commissioned officer.

Since arriving at DLA Distribution Korea, Alma has been a very active volunteer with the Better Opportunity for Single Soldiers as their senior leader. She is also a champion of Sexual Harassment/Assault and Prevention and ensures DLA Distribution Korea remains involved and committed in events held at Camp Carroll, Camp Walker and Camp Henry. She has a welcoming personality and is highly respected across all services.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         830,491
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,047,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                   594,539
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,881,443
<PP&E>                                       4,061,472
<DEPRECIATION>                               (500,148)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,032,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,847,460
<BONDS>                                     23,815,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       379,833
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,010,479)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,032,285
<SALES>                                     19,312,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,312,475
<CGS>                                       18,102,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,383,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             235,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,408,433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,409,233)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,409,233)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>