alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, Richard L. Feinstein, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ameritrans Capital Corporation;2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 16, 2011/s/ Richard L. Feinstein
Richard L. Feinstein
Chief Financial Officer
# JRF Members Receive Awards

/ Published Feb. 7, 2021
Fort Belvoir, Va., 
Five Joint Reserve Force military members received awards after nominations went to Headquarters for Reservists of the Year and Officer Leadership Achievement. The winners were announced at the 53rd Defense Logistics Agency Employee Recognition Ceremony Jan. 28.The Junior Enlisted Reservist of the Year Award went to Petty Officer 1st Class Salina Miller, Culinary Specialist. Some of the highlights of her performance were her involvement in Pacer Goose in Norfolk, Va., where she maintained training and readiness to respond to any crisis event. Miller also was key to the Rapid Deployment Readiness as the non-commissioned officer in charge of the Federal Emergency Management Agency Mission Support Team. Miller oversaw material turn-ins of 3,300 lines of serviceable materials valuing over $5 million.The Senior Non-commissioned Officer Reservist of the Year was awarded to Master Sgt. Elijah Loughridge, DLA Aviation material management technician.“Sergeant Loughridge demonstrated the top qualities required of today’s SNCOs: integrity, exemplary service, and a personal drive for excellence in all facets of life. In his role as a DLA Material Management Technician, he supports the supply needs of the Warfighter and is currently assigned to the DLA Aviation Joint Reserve Unit,” said Brigadier Gen. David Sanford, DLA JRF Aviation commander.Loughridge accomplished himself as a lead trainer for Logistics Assistance Teams helping maintain mission success. He also coordinated a U.S. Air Force heritage event that honored 12 Tuskegee Airmen and more than 40 veterans.Navy Lt. David Skinner won the Company Grade Officer Reservist of the Year. His accomplishments include serving as Watch Officer for Pacific Sentry Keen Edge 2020 and Night Action officer as a liaison between U.S. and Japan exercise management. Skinner also volunteers as a Boy Scout Troop leader and was key to getting his team working via teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic.Army Lt. Col. Dominick Versace won the Field Grade Officer Reservist of the Year. His actions included serving as DLA Distribution’s Chief of Transportation providing guidance for stateside and overseas travel. Versace helped DLA Distribution save potential millions of dollars in freight costs by working with General Services Administration. Versace also volunteers on the Freedom Bus which takes veterans from World War II to visit various monuments in Washington D.C.Commander Catherine Krakuszeski was awarded the JRF Officer Leadership Achievement award. Under her leadership, as the Commanding Officer for the Expeditionary Distribution Unit in Norfolk, she ensured readiness and recruitment throughout the year. Krakuszeski also ensured joint integration of 22 sailors and seven airmen as commanding officer of the Expeditionary Distribution Support Unit. She led the team in inventory of over 92 thousand line items valuing more than $440 million.The accomplishments of these award winners were read during the ceremony that premiered over video due to COVID-19 physical restraints.
Appeal Dismissed and Opinion Filed December 19, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00455-CR

CHLOE A. MENAGER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-00143-X

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the 

motion. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeal be DISMISSED and 

this decision be certified below for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

140455F.U05
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CHLOE A. MENAGER, Appellant

No. 05-14-00455-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 6, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-00143-X.

Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices 

Francis, Evans, and Stoddart.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 19th day of December, 2014.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15308]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ACE-7]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Le Mars, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Le Mars, IA.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 14604 is effective on 
0901 UTC, June 18, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, 
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on March 26, 1998 
(63 FR 14604). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on June 18, 1998. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this document confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on May 6, 1998.
Christopher R. Blum,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 98-15308 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
No. 10-5197.

#### Silver Jose Galindo, aka Daniel S. Galindo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 908, 131 S. Ct. 257,

178 L. Ed. 2d 170,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7026.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 367 Fed. Appx. 811.
No. D-2505.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Mary C. Wickenkamp.

562 U.S. 809, 131 S. Ct. 398,

178 L. Ed. 2d 264,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7649.

October 4, 2010.

Mary C. Wickenkamp, of Denison, Texas, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 09-11337.

#### Ambrose Akinmukomi, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 874, 131 S. Ct. 182,

178 L. Ed. 2d 108,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6778.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 522.
No. 12-7530.

#### Knox *v.*Oklahoma.

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2


I, Dane D. Anderson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MOCON, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
        to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
        including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
        within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
        report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
        procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
        of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
        over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
        recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
        case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
        likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
        financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2003
/s/ Dane D. Anderson
--------------------
Dane D. Anderson
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32280-32281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15727]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

June 8, 1998.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to

[[Page 32281]]

OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 
Public Law 104-13. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by 
calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer listed. Comments 
regarding this information collection should be addressed to the OMB 
reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department Clearance Officer, 
Department of the Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 13, 1998 
to be assured of consideration.

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF)

    OMB Number: 1512-0202.
    Form Number: ATF F 5110.34.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Notice of Change in Status of Plant.
    Description: ATF F 5110.34 is necessary to show the use of 
distilled spirits plant premises for other activities or by alternating 
proprietors. It describes proprietor's use of plant premises and other 
information to show that the change in plant status is in conformity 
with law and regulations. It also shows what bond covers the activities 
of the distilled spirits plant (DSP) at a given time.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 100.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1,000 hours.

    OMB Number: 1512-0209.
    Form Number: ATF F 5110.50.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Tax Deferral Bond--Distilled Spirits (Puerto Rico).
    Description: ATF Form 5110.50 is the bond to secure payment of 
excise taxes on distilled spirits shipped from Puerto Rico to the U.S. 
on deferral of the tax. The form identifies the principal, the surety, 
purpose of bond, and allocation of the penal sum among the principal's 
locations.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 10.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 10 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Robert N. Hogarth, (202) 927-8930, Bureau of 
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Room 3200, 650 Massachusetts Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, DC 20226.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-15727 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
No. D-2515.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Peter Michael Callegary.

562 U.S. 811, 131 S. Ct. 400,

178 L. Ed. 2d 266,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7608.

October 4, 2010.

Peter Michael Calle-gary, of Towson, Maryland, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Exhibit 18

Aquila, Inc.
20 West Ninth Street
Kansas City, MO 64105

May 10,
2002

This
letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a change in accounting principle or practice.

We
have been informed that, as of January 1, 2002, the Company changed from the lower of cost or market method of accounting for gas storage inventory for their Merchant Services subsidiary to
the fair value method. According to the management of the Company, this change was made to better facilitate the matching of inventory value to the related revenues from future contract commitments
that are also carried at fair value.

A
complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative principles has not been established by the
accounting profession. Thus, we cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have reviewed the
pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting, in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is based on our determination made in this manner.

We
are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons stated for the change and our discussions
with you, is also preferable under the circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.

We
have not audited the application of this change to the financial statements of any period subsequent to December 31, 2001. Further, we have not examined and do not express any opinion with
respect to your financial statements for the 3 months ended March 31, 2002.

Very
truly yours,

/s/
Arthur Andersen LLP

Arthur
Andersen LLP

---
# C_2013260EN.01003401.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/34

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 5 July 2013 — M.G., N.R.; other party: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

(Case C-383/13)

2013/C 260/62

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: M.G.

N.R.

Other party: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does infringement by the national administrative authority of the general principle of respect for the rights of the defence, which is also given expression in Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, (1) in (the course of the preparation of) an extension decision within the terms of Article 15(6) of Directive 2008/115/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, automatically and in all cases mean that the detention must be lifted? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does infringement by the national administrative authority of the general principle of respect for the rights of the defence, which is also given expression in Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, (1) in (the course of the preparation of) an extension decision within the terms of Article 15(6) of Directive 2008/115/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, automatically and in all cases mean that the detention must be lifted?

1

2

| 2. | Does that general principle of respect for the rights of the defence leave scope for a balancing of interests in which, in addition to the seriousness of the infringement of that principle and the interests of the foreign national adversely affected thereby, the interests of the Member State served by the extension of the detention measure are also taken into account? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does that general principle of respect for the rights of the defence leave scope for a balancing of interests in which, in addition to the seriousness of the infringement of that principle and the interests of the foreign national adversely affected thereby, the interests of the Member State served by the extension of the detention measure are also taken into account?

---

(1)  OJ 2000 C 364, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.

2

---
#### Alwin Dworman, Respondent, v Carard Management Corp. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[52 NYS3d 225]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered January 30, 2017, which denied defendants Carard Management Corp. and Dean Palin’s motion to stay the action pending arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*524The arbitration demands, which identify the issues to be arbitrated, and the claims asserted in the complaint are not “inextricably intertwined]” so as to warrant staying the judicial proceeding lest the resolution of the arbitrable issues narrow or resolve the non-arbitrable issues *(see County Glass & Metal Installers, Inc. v Pavarini McGovern, LLC,*65 AD3d 940, 940 [1st Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Moreover, no defendant in this action is a party to the arbitration.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.