alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2180

To define certain terms for purposes of the Federal Land Policy and

Management Act of 1976, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To define certain terms for purposes of the Federal Land

Policy and Management Act of 1976, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Government

5 Planning Involvement Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENTITY.

7 Section 103(b) of the Federal Land Policy and Man8 agement Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1702(b)) is amended by

9 adding at the end the following: ‘‘For purposes of the

10 preceeding sentence, the term ‘local government entity’
2

•S 2180 IS

1 means a local political entity created or recognized pursu2 ant to State law, including—

3 ‘‘(1) county commissions;

4 ‘‘(2) special service districts;

5 ‘‘(3) water districts;

6 ‘‘(4) cities;

7 ‘‘(5) towns; and

8 ‘‘(6) regional and local government associa9 tions.’’.

10 SEC. 3. COORDINATION.

11 Section 202(c)(9) of the Federal Land Policy and

12 Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712(c)(9)) is

13 amended by inserting after ‘‘land resource management

14 programs.’’ the following: ‘‘Such coordination shall include

15 (A) notification by the Secretary to Governors of States

16 and heads of local governments of the intent or plan to

17 conduct land use surveys, inventories, studies, and plan18 ning; (B) inclusion of State and local government employ19 ees in all inventory, planning, and management activities

20 upon request by the heads of State and local governments;

21 and (C) making available, upon request by the heads of

22 State and local governments, regulations, inventories,

23 management plans, and long- and short-term work plans

24 relating to Federal land use and management during their

25 preparation.’’.
3

•S 2180 IS

Æ
# De artment of Environmental Qualit
. . p

To protect, conserve and enhance the quality of Wyoming's " environment for the benefit of current and future generations. , Matthew H. Mead, Governor John Corra, Director


### June 25, 2012 

# JUL 0

~ 

# : 2017 Sadie Hoskie 8P-W-WW U.S. EPA, Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129
Re: Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General Permit, 401 Certification Dear Ms. Hoskie: In accordance with the provisions of Section 401 of the Clean Water Act regarding water quality certifications of federal permits which may discharge to waters of the state, this office has reviewed the proposed vessel and small vessel general perrnits and has made the following determination: It is unlikely that either of the proposed permits have any significant application to vessels which may be operating in waters in the state of Wyoming. Therefore, we are waiving certification on both permits because of a general lack of applicability.

Sincerely,

v 

### John V. Corra Director JVC/WJD/rm/12-0568 cc: John Wagner, WDEQ Bill DiRienzo, WDEQ

Herschler Building • 122 West 25th Street - Cheyenne, WY 82002 - http://deq.state.wy.us ADMINIOUTREACH ABANDONED MINES AIR QUALITY {NDUSTRIAL SITING LAND QUALITY SOLID 8 HAZ. WASTE WATER QUALITY (307)777-7758 (307)777-6145 (307)777-7391 (307)777-7369 (307)777-7756 (307)777-7752 (307)777-7781 FAX 777-7682 FAX 777-6462 FAX 777-5616 FAX 777-6937 FAX 777-586d FAX 777 - FQ71 FAY 777-007'A
No. 09-10503.

#### Jason Mourguet, Petitioner v. Gerald Hofbauer, Warden.

562 U.S. 845, 131 S. Ct. 84,

178 L. Ed. 2d 54,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5872.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### Goodover, II v. Oblander, et al.

DA 16-0726

05/30/17

2017 MT 130N

Affirmed

Dist. 8 (Cascade)
[73 NE3d 341, 51 NYS3d 1]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elmer Castillo, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Degraffenreid, Appellant.

Decided March 23, 2017

*937APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,*New York City *(Akash M. Toprani, George R. Painter IV*and *Samuel S. Brickfield*of counsel), for appellant in the first above-entitled action.

*Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation,*New York City *(Barbara Zolot*of counsel), for appellant in the second above-entitled action.

*Dar cel D. Clark, District Attorney,*Bronx *(Lori Ann Farrington*of counsel), for respondent in the first and second above-entitled actions.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed in each case. Codefendants Elmer Castillo and Brian Degraffen-reid appeal from orders of the Appellate Division affirming their convictions for manslaughter in the first degree. Co-defendants’ challenge to the trial court’s general charge on causation is unpreserved, and there was no mode of proceedings error *(see People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; *see also People v Thomas,*50 NY2d 467, 472 [1980]; *People v Patterson,*39 NY2d 288, 295 [1976]). In addition, defense counsel’s failure to object to the charge does not constitute ineffective assistance, as the jury instructions, viewed in totality, neither improperly shifted the burden to codefendants nor relieved the People of their burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see Thomas,*50 NY2d at 472; *see also People v Drake,*7 NY3d 28, 33-34 [2006]). Additionally, codefendants’remaining ineffective assistance of counsel claims are without merit as both codefendants received meaningful representation *(see People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; *see also People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 714 [1998]; *People v Mahboubian,*74 NY2d 174, 183-184 [1989]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004]).

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.

*938In each case: On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Drone/VAS Practice Group

# ANTONELLI

-- LAW - , ---

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 35 E Wacker Drive Suite 1875 Chicago, IL 60601 Tel. 312.201.8310 JefJrev( ZvAntonelli-Law.com January 21, 2016

Re: Amendment to Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. Exemption No . 11467 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-20 15-0261 Dear Sir or Madam: Our client, Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. ("AIR") requests an amendment to FAA Exemption No. 11467, Docket No. FAA-2015-0261 for the purpose of conducting tethered commercial UA operations . Our client has been approved to use the DJI S800, S900, and S1000, in addition to a proprietary UA, the ReadyCopter. We ask for expedited approval for this amendment due to the reduction ofrisk offatal falls. AIR now seeks permission to operate these UAs using a tethered configuration. This tethered configuration has been described in the confidential materials being submitted along with this letter. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §11.35 , AIR requests confidential treatment for information regarding the tethering system, submitted under separate over. It requests that the information contained in that document not be made public because it is a trade secret whose disclosure would harm the owner of the information. It contains valuable commercial data that is not publicly available and is protected from release under the Freedom oflnformation Act, 5 U.S.C. §552(b)(4). Ifwe can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review ofthis document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 312-201-8310 or via email at Jetfrev(il{AntonelliLaw.com.

Attorneys for Aerial Inspe
No. 10-42.

#### David Joe Shelton, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 891, 131 S. Ct. 248,

178 L. Ed. 2d 138,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5998.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 431.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7938

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ORLANDOUS L. MAYE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-99-104, CA-01-1507-AM)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlandous L. Maye, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Joseph Krysa, David

Hackney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We note that, although Maye states that he raised a claim of

error under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), in his

petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court after the dismissal of

his first § 2255 motion, he has not made an Apprendi claim in this

proceeding.

2

PER CURIAM:

Orlandous Maye seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially

on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Maye,

Nos. CR-99-104; CA-01-1507-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 9, 2001). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Com. v. Love

10/07/2015

307 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 1062
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1814

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that a taxpayer

may elect to include in income crop insurance proceeds and disaster

payments in the year of the disaster or in the following year.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 1 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Mr. DASCHLE (for himself, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr.

BOREN, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. KOHL, Mr. DOLE, Mr.

CONRAD, Mr. DORGAN, and Mr. DURENBERGER) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that a taxpayer may elect to include in income crop

insurance proceeds and disaster payments in the year

of the disaster or in the following year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULE FOR CROP INSURANCE PRO4 CEEDS AND DISASTER PAYMENTS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 451(d) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rule for crop
2

•S 1814 IS

1 insurance proceeds and disaster payments) is amended to

2 read as follows:

3 ‘‘(d) SPECIAL RULE FOR CROP INSURANCE PRO4 CEEDS AND DISASTER PAYMENTS.—

5 ‘‘(1) GENERAL RULE.—In the case of any pay6 ment described in paragraph (2), a taxpayer report7 ing on the cash receipts and disbursements method

8 of accounting—

9 ‘‘(A) may elect to treat any such payment

10 received in the taxable year of destruction or

11 damage of crops as having been received in the

12 following taxable year if the taxpayer estab13 lishes that, under the taxpayer’s practice, in14 come from such crops involved would have been

15 reported in the following taxable year, or

16 ‘‘(B) may elect to treat any such payment

17 received in the taxable year following the tax18 able year of the destruction or damage of crops

19 as having been received in the taxable year of

20 destruction or damage, if the taxpayer estab21 lishes that, under the taxpayer’s practice, in22 come from such crops involved would have been

23 reported in the taxable year of destruction or

24 damage.
3

•S 1814 IS

1 ‘‘(2) PAYMENTS DESCRIBED.—For purposes of

2 this subsection, a payment is described in this para3 graph if such payment—

4 ‘‘(A) is insurance proceeds received on ac5 count of destruction or damage to crops, or

6 ‘‘(B) is disaster assistance received under

7 any Federal law as a result of—

8 ‘‘(i) destruction or damage to crops

9 caused by drought, flood, or other natural

10 disaster, or

11 ‘‘(ii) inability to plant crops because

12 of such a disaster.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 this section applies to payments received after December

15 31, 1992, as a result of destruction or damage occurring

16 after such date.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jordan Martinez, Appellant.

[65 NYS3d 689]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered July 5, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Demorest, ChiefExecutive Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of MOCON, Inc.

 

 

Date:  August 13, 2010

 
| /s/  Robert L. Demorest  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Robert  L. Demorest      |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

----
No. 09-11247.

#### Barry Lamont Price, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 869, 131 S. Ct. 167,

178 L. Ed. 2d 99,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6535.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of VitalWorks Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Joseph M. Walsh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Michael A. Manto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to our knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                        /s/ Joseph M. Walsh                       March 12, 2004
                        ------------------------
                        Joseph M. Walsh                                     Date
                        Chief Executive Officer

                        /s/ Michael A. Manto                      March 12, 2004
                        ------------------------
                        Michael A. Manto                                    Date
                        Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Application Tendered for Filing With the Commission

May 19, 1998.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Major Relicense.
    b. Project No.: P-2634-007.
    c. Date Filed: April 28, 1998.
    d. Applicant: Great Northern Paper, Inc.
    e. Name of Project: Storage Project.
    f. Location: On Ragged Stream, Caucomgomoc Stream, and West Branch 
and South Branch of the Penobscot River in the Counties of Somerset and 
Piscataquis, Maine.
    g. Filed pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Brian Stetson, Manager of Environmental 
Affairs, Great Northern Paper, Inc., One Katahdin Avenue, Millinocket, 
ME 04462-1398, (207) 723-2664.
    i. FERC Contact: William Diehl, P.E. (202) 219-2813.
    j. Comment Date: 60 days from the date of filing of the 
application.
    k. Description of Project: The constructed project consists of four 
dams and reservoirs on headwaters tributaries of the Penobscot River. 
The four developments are named Canada Falls Lake, Seboomook Lake, 
Caucomgomoc Lake, and Ragged Lake. There are no power generating 
facilities included in the project. The total storage capacity of the 
four reservoirs is about 9.224 billion cubic feet or about 212,000 
acre-feet.
    l. With this notice we are initiating consultation with the MAINE 
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER (SHPO), as required by Sec. 106, 
National Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of the Advisory 
Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR 800.4.
    m. Pursuant to Section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's 
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes 
that an additional scientific study should be conducted in order to 
form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the 
application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person 
must file a request for a study with the Commission not later than 60 
days from the date of filing of the application, and serve a copy of 
the request on the applicant.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13833 Filed 5-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Com. v. Metzger 34

03/15/2016

457 WAL (2015)

34

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 466
# ‘Walk a Mile’ in September to support sexual assault survivors

/ Published Aug. 25, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
Get ready to put on your sneakers and walk a mile next month for a good cause.

The Defense Logistics Agency Sexual Assault Prevention and Response program is asking members of the workforce to participate in the “Walk a Mile” month-long event to support survivors of sexual assault.

“By taking part, you are not only getting out of the house and promoting physical activity, but you will be helping to raise awareness for sexual violence in the military,” said Gina Ingrao, the DLA Troop Support Sexual Assault Response Coordinator.

Participants are encouraged to walk outdoors and take photos of their activity, which can be sent to sapr@dla.mil and gina.ingrao@dla.mil. Identify yourself as a member of the Troop Support workforce when sending in photos.

Walkers are also encouraged to wear teal, the nationally-recognized color for sexual violence awareness and prevention.

If you are unable to walk outdoors, submit photos of you walking indoors, such as on a treadmill, to show your support, Ingrao said. Photos of sneakers or walking shoes on a trail are welcome, too, she said.

“Walk by yourself, with a friend, or get the whole family involved,” Ingrao said. “Dogs and dog pictures are highly encouraged as well.”

The DLA Sexual Assault Prevention and Response program launched a new awareness and prevention campaign in July to include events that would have been held during April, which is Sexual Assault and Awareness Prevention Month. With a theme and hashtag of “Not Just April,” employees can participate in events whether they are in the office or teleworking, Ingrao said.

In November, the workforce will be encouraged to wear denim on Fridays to support survivors of sexual assault and raise awareness of sexual violence.

Contact Ingrao at 267-253-8953 or the DLA SAPR Hotline at 1-800-841-0937 for resources or to make a report.

For resources and more information on the DLA SAPR Program, visit https://dla.mil/Info/SAPR.aspx.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

JONATHAN GUIJOSA, No. 08-19-00014-CR

§

APPELLANT, Appeal from the

§

V. 371st District Court

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Tarrant County, Texas

§

APPELLEE. (TC# 1516287D)

§

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
# 2022 DLA Hall of Fame inductee: Ted Case

/ Published Aug. 9, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
*Editor’s Note: This is one of six stories featuring 2022 DLA Hall of Fame inductees. A ceremony highlighting their contributions to the agency will be held Aug. 17 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex.*

A former leader known for driving some of the most consequential programs in Defense Logistics Agency history is a member of the 2022 DLA Hall of Fame.

Edward “Ted” Case spent 26 years at DLA with the last six as agency vice director. He arrived at DLA as a Navy officer in 1992 to lead the integration of budgeting and systems with new information technology tools.

After retiring from active duty as a captain in 2001, Case spent nine years as DLA’s deputy chief information officer. He worked with DLA Hall of Famer Mae DeVincentis to replace the agency’s 40-year-old IT supply system with Business Systems Modernization. During the seven-year project, Case served as senior technical advisor, integrating stakeholders from across the Defense Department and private sector.

DLA’s success in IT continued with Case leading the implementation of in-transit visibility and expansion of the Joint Total Asset Visibility System. He also furthered DLA’s ability to support warfighters in overseas locations through secure telecommunications and a web-based version of the agency’s distribution systems for in-theater use.

Case became chief information officer in 2010, then in 2012 he was named DLA vice director. He oversaw the agency’s audit readiness efforts, which transformed DLA culture with a full-spectrum accounting of all agency processes and supporting systems. And through the Business Process Improvement Initiative, he helped the agency realize over $12.4 billion in savings and cost avoidance through practices such as reverse auctions, demand planning and conversion of fuel from military to commercial specification.

“I can say without hesitation that every major initiative we undertook during my tenure had a large dose of Ted Case’s expertise, advice and wise counsel,” former DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams said in Case’s nomination.

Case is also credited by fellow leaders for helping to expand DLA’s partnership with other federal agencies supporting disaster relief.
2016-1653.

#### Bretz v. Nagy.

Portage App. No. 2015-P-0082, 2016-Ohio-3008.