alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# New commander tours Bagram site

/ Published Aug. 9, 2019
Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, 
Defense Logistics Agency employees at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, recently welcomed the new commander of the 1st Theater Sustainment Command for a visit.

Navy Lt. Cmdr. Steve Harrell, officer in in charge of DLA Disposition Services-Afghanistan, and some of his staff recently provided Army Maj. Gen. John Sullivan with a “walk and talk” of current capabilities, surge capacity, and the demilitarization process of up-armored equipment.  The conversation also included the challenges and differences faced by DLA Disposition Services in supporting the different Iraq and Afghanistan missions. 

“He has worked with DLA before and is very familiar with the agency’s capabilities,” Harrell said. This was an opportunity to reset the stage on our current theater posture and to reassure the 1st TSC that we are here to support the warfighter.”

According to a 1st TSC news story, Sullivan assumed command July 2 at a Fort Knox, Kentucky, ceremony where he relieved Army Maj. Gen. Flem B. “Donnie” Walker Jr. In his remarks, Sullivan stated that he is “committed to maintaining the Army Central Command’s established reputation for excellence.”

 “Working with all of you, I look forward to navigating the challenges and opportunities which lay ahead,” Sullivan said.
No. 09-10761.

#### Dale G. Wills, Petitioner v. Todd Barton, Clerk, Superior Court of California, Kings County.

562 U.S. 803, 131 S. Ct. 106,

178 L. Ed. 2d 4,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7781.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-84566, 333-76698, 333-62444 and 333-41782) and in
the related Prospectuses and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-62414, 333-62410, 333-62406, 333-94345, 333-41477 and 333-57879) of EPIX Medical, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 2002,
with respect to the financial statements of EPIX Medical, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.



Boston,
Massachusetts
March 26, 2002

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Mid-State Bancshares (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

|Date: March 10, 2004 |  | /s/JAMES W. LOKEYJames W. Lokey                                                      |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                                               
|Date: March 10, 2004 |  | /s/JAMES G. STATHOSJames G. Stathos
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---
Exhibit 11.1



             COMPUTATION OF PRO-FORMA INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Year ended         Nine months
                                                                            December 31,      December 31,
                                                                                1996              1995
<S>                                                                        <C>                 <C>


Weighted average common shares outstanding                                     1,539,681         1,507,182

Options, based on treasury stock method (1)                                    1,364,825           697,529
Warrants, based on treasury stock method                                          56,317            17,777
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, as if converted (2)                    4,429,590         4,429,590
Convertible preferred stock, as if converted                                     320,731           320,731
                                                                           -------------     -------------

Total                                                                          7,711,144         6,972,809
                                                                           =============      ============

Net income (loss)                                                               $268,062      $(4,892,928)
                                                                           =============      ============

Pro-forma net income (loss) per share                                              $0.03           $(0.70)
                                                                           =============     =============
</TABLE>

(1)  Includes options issued within 12 months prior to initial public offering
     as if issued at beginning of earliest period presented.

(2)   Includes convertible preferred stock issued within 12 months prior to
     initial public offering as if issued at beginning of earliest period
     presented.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Matthew J. Sassenscheid, Jr., Also Known as Matthew Garcia, Appellant.

[47 NYS3d 717]

Appeal by the defendant from a *733judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered December 2, 2015, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the negotiated sentence, which was to run consecutively to the sentence the defendant was still serving at the time the judgment was rendered, was not excessive *(see People v Karimzada,*48 AD3d 482, 483 [2008]; *People v Salmons,*210 AD2d 512, 513 [1994]; *People v Alvira,*209 AD2d 628, 629 [1994]; *People v Edwards,*159 AD2d 583, 585 [1990]).

Rivera, J.R, Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
# DAWIA certification changes announced to mitigate Covid-19 impact

/ Published June 3, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act Program provides resources to help acquisition workforce members understand the Covid-19 impacts toward completing DAWIA certification requirements.

If you ever thought the 24-month path to meeting DAWIA certification requirements was more like a labyrinth than a straight way, adding the Coronavirus travel restrictions and course cancellations or conversions doesn’t clear the path any further. The good news is that the Acquisition workforce concerns are being heard.

First Change: With the threat of delinquency looming for associates because of the initial class cancellations, the Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisition and Sustainment, signed a memorandum granting a 12-month extension of grace period.  This extension allows associates that are currently working toward certification 36 months to meet certification requirements in lieu of 24 months.

Second Change: With travel restrictions and social distancing guidance in place, Defense Acquisition University will convert all instructor-led training through Dec. 31, 2020 to virtual instructor-led training.  Acquisition workforce members are instructed not to cancel any registered training. DAU will contact you prior to your course offering with course status.

Third Change: To allow time to reconfigure courses, DAU has pushed the release and publication date of the FY21 schedule to Aug. 27, 2020.  Students will be able to register in the Defense Acquisition Talent Management System. At that time DAU will only release the first 6 months of FY21, October to March. On Jan. 26, 2021, DAU will release the second half of the FY21, April to September.

Although there have been many impacts to the certification process with the COVID-19 restrictions in place, there are a few things that are still the same.  Follow these tips to ensure timely certification.• Visit www.DAU.mil for your latest certification requirements based on your career field.  If DAU changes a certification requirement, it will be listed here first.• Visit www.atrrs.army.mil/Datms to register for training. You can register for up to two instructor led courses at a time.  Ensure prerequisites are scheduled appropriately.• Visit https://identity.dau.edu/EmpowerIDWebIdPForms/Login/VirtualCampus to complete DAU online training.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[C-560-804]


Notice of Postponement of Time Limit for Countervailing Duty 
Investigation: Extruded Rubber Thread From Indonesia

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Import Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 10, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Moore or Maria MacKay at 
(202) 482-2876, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230.

Postponement

    On April 28, 1998, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
initiated a countervailing duty investigation of extruded rubber thread 
from Indonesia. On May 29, 1998, in accordance with section 351.205(e) 
of the Department's regulations (19 CFR 351.205(e), published at 62 FR 
27295, May 19, 1997), the petitioner made a timely request that the 
Department postpone its preliminary determination. As we find no 
compelling reasons to deny this request, we are postponing the 
preliminary determination in this investigation to no later than August 
28, 1998, pursuant to section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended.
    This notice is published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act.

    Dated June 2, 1998.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-15348 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              56
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      354
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           7,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          5,547
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,281
<OTHER-SE>                                      (8,408)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,405
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,066
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (517)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (517)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-8781.

#### Gallardo *v.*United States et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2010266EN.01004401.xml

| 9.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 266/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 266/44

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 896/2010

of 8 October 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Schrobenhausener Spargel/Spargel aus dem Schrobenhausener Land/Spargel aus dem Anbaugebiet Schrobenhausen (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Schrobenhausener Spargel/Spargel aus dem Schrobenhausener Land/Spargel aus dem Anbaugebiet Schrobenhausen’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Schrobenhausener Spargel/Spargel aus dem Schrobenhausener Land/Spargel aus dem Anbaugebiet Schrobenhausen’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 October 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 34, 11.2.2010, p. 11.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

GERMANY

Schrobenhausener Spargel/Spargel aus dem Schrobenhausener Land/Spargel aus dem Anbaugebiet Schrobenhausen (PGI)

---
uWink ex-10.1



Exhibit 10.1




1



 

 





2



 




3



 




4



 




5



 




6



 




7



 




8



 




9



 




10



 




11



 




12



 




13



 




14
No. 09-11476.

#### Brevelle Crockett, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 883, 131 S. Ct. 206,

178 L. Ed. 2d 124,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6965.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 900.
No. 10-5313.

#### Daniel Ogwoka Siringi, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 914, 131 S. Ct. 275,

178 L. Ed. 2d 181,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7366.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 494.
# Bellwood elk pass annual inspection with flying colors

/ Published March 18, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
The elk roaming freely within designated pastures on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, were given a clean bill of health by the Commonwealth of Virginia during their annual inspection March 16.

Regional Wildlife Biologist David Garst with the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources came to the installation and conducted an inspection of the eight males and 16 females.

Jimmy Parrish, the chief of the Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond’s Environmental Management Division said the inspection is necessary for the installation to maintain its exhibit wild animal’s permit.

The inspection ensures the elk are in good shape, well cared for and the pastures and equipment used to care for them are well maintained.

Will Crump, an environmental protection specialist who helps oversee and care for the elk, said that the Environmental Management Division is faced with the ongoing challenge of matching the elk to their distinctive ear tag numbers. He said that’s because the elk, especially the females, tend to rub/pull these tags off, making it tougher to identify the age and sex of the animal.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2204 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2204

    To provide authority for the NRC to recover costs of regulating 
                       Agreement State programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 16 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

Mr. Durenberger introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide authority for the NRC to recover costs of regulating 
                       Agreement State programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be referred to as the ``Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
Fee Equity Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. COLLECTION AUTHORITY.

    Section 6101(c) of Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (42 
U.S.C. 2214) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Annual Charges.--
            ``(1) Persons subject to charge.--Any licensee of the 
        Commission or any State with which the Commission has entered 
        into a cooperative agreement pursuant to section 274 of the 
        Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, may be required to pay, 
        in addition to the fees set forth in subsection (b), an annual 
        charge.
            ``(2) Aggregate amount of charges.--The aggregate amount of 
        the annual charge collected from all persons subject to such 
        charge, as identified in paragraph (1), shall equal an amount 
        that approximates 100 percent of the budget authority of the 
        Commissions in the fiscal year in which such charge is 
        collected, less any amount appropriated to the Commission from 
        the Nuclear Waste Fund and the amount of fees collected under 
        subsection (b) in such fiscal year.
            ``(3) Amount.--The Commission shall establish, by rule, a 
        schedule of charges fairly and equitably allocating the 
        aggregate amount of charges described in paragraph (2) among 
        persons subject to such charge as identified in paragraph (1). 
        To the maximum extent practicable, the charges shall have a 
        reasonable relationship to the cost of providing regulatory 
        services and may be based on the allocation of the Commission's 
        resources among licensees, classes of licensees, and States 
        with which the Commission has entered into a cooperative 
        agreement pursuant to section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 
        1954, as amended.''.

                                 <all>
```
# DLA Troop Support celebrates retirement of eight civilian employees

/ Published Dec. 16, 2020
Philadelphia, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support workforce family celebrated the retirement of eight civilian employees during a virtual ceremony on Dec. 14.

Army Brig. Gen. Gavin Lawrence, DLA Troop Support commander, thanked the new retirees and their families who joined over the phone and through video conferencing for their combined 296 years of service to the country.

“I think we can all agree that 2020 has been a year unlike no other, but despite restrictions imposed by COVID-19, we would absolutely not let this year pass without recognizing the significant accomplishments, contributions, and service of our retirees,” Lawrence said.

He also expressed gratitude for their service to DLA Troop Support and its mission.

“It is always an honor for me to have the opportunity to celebrate those employees who have given so much of themselves to the mission of this organization and to our warfighters, like me, serving around the world,” Lawrence said.

Lawrence acknowledged the retirees’ families for providing support and encouragement over the years.

“The longevity of these wonderful careers can only thrive with the love and support of the family and friends here today, in addition to the numerous co-workers who are in attendance,” Lawrence said.

Each employee will be mailed a certificate of retirement, a DLA Troop Support memento, and a commander’s coin. In addition, spouses will receive certificates of appreciation.

The retirees were:
      - Lynn DiVencenzo, 43 years, Clothing and Textiles
      - Chuck Grabowski, 42 years, Internal Review
      - Susan Hill, 41 years, Industrial Hardware
      - Richard Betshner, 40 years, Construction and Equipment
      - Deborah Donnelly, 39 years, Clothing and Textiles
      - Lee Ann Richardson-Stewart, 37 years, Internal Review
      - Thomas Scariato, 35 years, Construction and Equipment
      - Alicia McGee, 19 years, Procurement
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Systems Ltd.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Joseph Gaspar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.

Date: June 28, 2005

                                                   /s/ Joseph Gaspar
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Joseph Gaspar
                                                   Chief Financial Officer