35792 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 23, 2010 / Notices 

increase in fuel cost that is expected to 

occur. Therefore, the lump-sum 

payment from the SWPA should be 

factored-up to offset the effect of income 

taxes to ensure that Empire is 

adequately compensated for the 

increased fuel cost that Empire expects 

to experience as a result of the White 

River Minimum Flows project.’’ 

Response: Do not concur. See 

previous response. 

3. Comment. ‘‘SWPA should increase 

the lump-sum payment it determines is 

appropriate, based on the other 

variables, by factoring-up the amount 

for income taxes. This calculation will 

offset the loss of funds, as a result of 

income taxes, and ensure that Empire 

receives adequate compensation for the 

increased fuel cost that it expects to 

incur as a result of the White River 

Minimum Flows project. 

Response: Do not concur. See 

response to Comment 1. 

4. Comment. ‘‘SWPA should increase 

the lump-sum payment it determines is 

appropriate, based on the other 

variables, by multiplying the amount by 

a tax factor. As of today, I have not been 

able to determine what this factor 

should be. My point is that there should 

definitely be a calculation to off-set the 

loss of funds available for investment, as 

a result of the income taxes in the year 

Empire receives the lump-sum payment, 

and ensure that Empire receives 

adequate compensation for the 

increased fuel cost that it expects to 

incur as a result of the White River 

Minimum Flows project.’’ 

Response: Do not concur. See 

response to Comment 1. 

H. Lack of Consultation by 

Southwestern 

1. Comment. The non-Federal 

licensee commented, ‘‘Section 132 of the 

Energy and Water Development 

Appropriations Act, 2006 states ‘The 

Administrator of the Southwestern 

Power Administration, in consultation 

with the project licensee and the 

relevant state public utility 

commissions, shall determine any 

impacts on electric energy and capacity 

generated at Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission Project No. 2221 caused by 

the storage reallocation of Bull Shoals 

Lake, based on data and 

recommendations provided by the 

relevant state public utility 

commissions.’ To Empire’s knowledge, 

despite the fact Empire feels there was 

constructive dialogue during the 

development of the initial January 22, 

2009 Final Determination, no 

consultation occurred between the Final 

Determination and the Draft Addendum 

to the Final Determination. Empire 

stands ready to discuss any of our 

comments with SWPA before the 

Addendum to the Final Determination 

is finalized.’’ 

Response: Southwestern consulted 

with the non-Federal licensee and the 

MoPSC in a September 28, 2009, 

meeting to discuss their comments and 

concerns with Southwestern’s June 2009 

Draft Addendum. Southwestern 

subsequently consulted with the nonFederal licensee and the MoPSC in 

developing a source for REC prices to be 

utilized in the final compensation 

calculations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–15227 Filed 6–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0544; FRL–9167–3] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request; Information 

Request for Pulp and Paper Sector 

New Source Performance Standards 

(NSPS) and National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

(NESHAP) Residual Risk and 

Technology Review; EPA ICR No. 

2393.01, OMB Control Number 2060– 

NEW 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.), this action announces that 

the EPA is planning to submit a request 

for a new Information Collection 

Request to the Office of Management 

and Budget. This is a request for a new 

collection. Before submitting the 

Information Collection Request to the 

Office of Management and Budget for 

review and approval, EPA is soliciting 

comments on the proposed information 

collection as described below. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before August 23, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2007–0544, by one of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov 

• Fax: (202) 566–1741 

• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and 

Information Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 22821T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. 

• Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation 

Docket and Information Center, U.S. 

EPA, Room 3334, EPA West Building, 

1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC. Such deliveries are 

only accepted during the Docket’s 

normal hours of operation and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2007– 

0544. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available on-line at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an e-mail 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill 

Schrock, Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards, (E143–03), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 

27711; telephone number: (919) 541– 

5032; fax number: (919) 541–3470; email address: schrock.bill@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

How can I access the docket and/or 

submit comments? 

EPA has established a public docket 

for this Information Collection Request 

(ICR) under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2007–0544, which is available for 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 23, 2010 / Notices 35793 

1As defined in 40 CFR 63.2, ‘‘Major source’’ 

means any stationary source or group of stationary 

sources located within a contiguous area and under 

common control that emits or has the potential to 

emit considering controls, in the aggregate, 10 tons 

per year or more of any hazardous air pollutant or 

25 tons per year or more of any combination of 

hazardous air pollutants, unless the Administrator 

establishes a lesser quantity, or in the case of 

radionuclides, different criteria from those specified 

in this sentence. 

on-line viewing at www.regulations.gov, 

or in person viewing at the Air and 

Radiation Docket in the EPA Docket 

Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 

3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public 

Reading Room is open from 8 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The telephone 

number for the Reading Room is 202– 

566–1744, and the telephone number for 

the Air and Radiation Docket is 202– 

566–1742. 

Use www.regulations.gov to obtain a 

copy of the draft collection of 

information, submit or view public 

comments, access the index listing of 

the contents of the docket, and to access 

those documents in the public docket 

that are available electronically. Once in 

the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in 

the docket ID number identified in this 

document. 

What information is EPA particularly 

interested in? 

Pursuant to Paperwork Reduction Act 

(PRA) section 3506(c)(2)(A), EPA 

specifically solicits comments and 

information to enable it to: 

(i) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

Agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(iii) Enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(iv) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated electronic, 

mechanical or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology (e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses). 

What should I consider when I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

You may find the following 

suggestions helpful for preparing your 

comments: 

1. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible and provide specific examples. 

2. Describe any assumptions that you 

used. 

3. Provide copies of any technical 

information and/or data you used that 

support your views. 

4. If you estimate potential burden or 

costs, explain how you arrived at the 

estimate that you provide. 

5. Offer alternative ways to improve 

the collection activity. 

6. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the deadline identified 

under DATES. 

7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, 

be sure to identify the docket ID number 

assigned to this action in the subject 

line on the first page of your response. 

You may also provide the name, date 

and Federal Register citation. 

What information collection activity or 

ICR does this apply to? 

Affected entities: Respondents 

affected by this action are owners/ 

operators of mills that are major 

sources 1 of Hazardous Air Pollutant 

(HAP) emissions and produce pulp, 

perform bleaching or manufacture paper 

or paperboard products, including: 

• Mills that carry out chemical wood 

pulping (kraft, sulfite, soda or semichemical), 

• Mills that carry out mechanical, 

groundwood, secondary fiber and nonwood pulping, 

• Mills that perform bleaching, and 

• Mills that manufacture paper or 

paperboard products. 

Some mills perform multiple 

operations (e.g., chemical pulping, 

bleaching, and papermaking; pulping 

and unbleached papermaking; etc.). 

Mills that only purchase pre-consumer 

paper or paperboard products and 

convert them into other products (i.e., 

converting operations) are not affected 

by this action. The North American 

Industry Classification System (NAICS) 

codes for respondents affected by the 

information collection are listed in the 

following table. 

Category Description NAICS 

Code 

Industry ..... Pulp Mills ................... 32211 

Paper Mills ................. 32212 

Paperboard Mills ........ 32213 

Title: Information Collection Request 

for Pulp and Paper Sector New Source 

Performance Standards (NSPS) and 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 

Residual Risk and Technology Review 

(RTR). 

ICR numbers: EPA ICR Number 

2393.01, OMB Control Number 2060– 

NEW. 

ICR status: This ICR is for a new 

information collection activity. An 

Agency may not conduct or sponsor, 

and a person is not required to respond 

to, a collection of information, unless it 

displays a currently valid Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) control 

number. The OMB control numbers for 

EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (CFR), after 

appearing in the Federal Register when 

approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, 

are displayed either by publication in 

the Federal Register or by other 

appropriate means, such as on the 

related collection instrument or form, if 

applicable. The display of OMB control 

numbers in certain EPA regulations is 

consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. 

Abstract: This ICR is being conducted 

by EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation to 

assist the EPA Administrator, as 

required by sections 111(b), 112(d), and 

112(f)(6) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as 

amended, to determine the current 

affected population of pulp and paper 

processes and to re-evaluate emission 

standards for this source category. This 

one-time collection will solicit 

information under authority of CAA 

section 114. The EPA intends to provide 

the survey in electronic format. The 

survey will be sent to all facilities 

identified as being pulp and/or paper 

production facilities through 

information available to the Agency. 

EPA envisions allowing recipients 60 

days to respond to the survey. Nonconfidential information from this ICR 

would be made available to the public. 

EPA estimates the total cost of the 

information collection (for 386 

respondents) will be 127,906 hours and 

$12,100,453, which includes $2,316 in 

operation and maintenance (O&M) costs 

for mailing survey responses to EPA. 

The pulp and paper production 

source category includes any facility 

engaged in the production of pulp and/ 

or paper. This category includes, but is 

not limited to, integrated mills (where 

pulp alone or pulp and paper or 

paperboard are manufactured on-site), 

non-integrated mills (where paper or 

paperboard are manufactured, but no 

pulp is manufactured on-site), and 

secondary fiber mills (where waste 

paper is used as the primary raw 

material). The pulp and paper 

production process units include 

operations such as pulping, bleaching, 

chemical recovery and papermaking. 

Different pulping processes are used, 

including chemical processes (kraft, 

soda, sulfite and semi-chemical) and 

mechanical, secondary fiber or nonmstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

35794 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 23, 2010 / Notices 

wood processes. The three federal 

emission standards that are the subject 

of this information collection include: 

1. Standards of Performance for Kraft 

Pulp Mills (40 CFR part 60, subpart BB), 

2. National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Pulp 

and Paper Industry (40 CFR part 63, 

subpart S), and 

3. National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical 

Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, 

Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills (40 CFR part 63, 

subpart MM). 

The Standards of Performance (i.e., 

the NSPS) currently regulates 

particulate matter (PM) and total 

reduced sulfur emissions from kraft 

pulping processes. In general, NESHAP 

subpart S covers HAP emissions from 

the pulp production areas (e.g., pulping 

system vents, pulping process 

condensates) at chemical, mechanical, 

secondary fiber and non-wood pulp 

mills; bleaching operations; and 

papermaking systems. The subpart S 

standards include several alternative 

emission limits for each covered process 

that are designed to provide flexibility 

and promote and encourage the use of 

new technology, particularly combined 

air/water controls and pollution 

prevention technologies. The NESHAP 

subpart MM regulates HAP emissions 

from the chemical recovery combustion 

areas of chemical pulp mills (kraft, 

sulfite, semi-chemical and soda wood 

pulping processes). For existing kraft 

and soda combustion units, the subpart 

MM standards also include a 

compliance alternative that allows 

netting of PM emissions for the entire 

chemical recovery system. 

Section 111(b)(1)(B) of the CAA 

mandates that EPA review and, if 

appropriate, revise existing NSPS at 

least every eight years. The NSPS for 

kraft pulp mills was promulgated in 

1978 and reviewed in 1986. Another 

review of the kraft pulp mill NSPS is 

required under the CAA. Similarly, 

Section 112(f)(2) of the CAA directs EPA 

to conduct risk assessments on each 

source category subject to maximum 

achievable control technology (MACT) 

standards and determine if additional 

standards are needed to reduce residual 

risks. The section 112(f)(2) residual risk 

review is to be done eight years after 

promulgation. Section 112(d)(6) of the 

CAA requires EPA to review and revise 

the MACT standards, as necessary, 

taking into account developments in 

practices, processes and control 

technologies. The section 112(d)(6) 

technology review is to be done at least 

every eight years. The NESHAP for the 

pulp and paper industry (40 CFR part 

63, subpart S) was promulgated in 1998 

and is due for review under CAA 

sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6). 

Likewise, the NESHAP for chemical 

recovery combustion sources at kraft, 

soda, sulfite and stand-alone semichemical pulp mills (40 CFR part 63, 

subpart MM) was promulgated in 2001 

and is also due for review. In addition 

to the CAA-required reviews, recent 

case law and legal petitions suggest the 

need to review the pulp and paper 

NESHAP. For example, the EPA 

received a petition for rulemaking in 

January 2009 requesting that EPA revise 

various NESHAP, including the 

NESHAP for chemical recovery 

combustion sources at pulp mills, to 

make the NESHAP consistent with CAA 

precedent established in recent judicial 

rulings. Also, in December 2008, the 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit 

vacated the startup, shutdown, and 

malfunction provisions contained in the 

NESHAP General Provisions that apply 

to pulp and paper mills. To the extent 

that these legal actions need to be 

addressed in the pulp and paper 

NESHAP, EPA intends to investigate 

potential rule revisions at the same time 

as the CAA statutory reviews are 

conducted. 

The data used as the basis for the 

originally promulgated NESHAP are 

over 15 years old, and data used to 

review the NSPS are over 20 years old. 

The Agency is aware that significant 

changes have been made in the 

intervening years in the number of 

affected facilities, in industry ownership 

practices and in emission collection and 

control configurations. Further, in light 

of the statutory requirements for 

reviewing emission standards under 

CAA sections 111(b) and 112 and the 

recent case law interpreting those 

requirements, the Agency has 

concluded that obtaining updated 

information will be crucial to informing 

its decisions on the NSPS and NESHAP 

for pulp and paper manufacturing 

sources. 

The EPA has already begun 

assembling data for a preliminary 

residual risk assessment for the pulp 

and paper NESHAP subparts S and MM. 

Data sets derived from the EPA’s 2005 

National Scale Air Toxics Assessment 

(NATA) National Emissions Inventory 

(NEI) will be used for the RTR. 

Additional mill-specific information 

would allow EPA to better characterize 

emission sources, refine the risk 

analysis and to address any 

unacceptable residual risk that remains. 

An update of the 2005 NATA NEI data 

sets and more specific information 

needed for rulemaking regulatory 

analyses would be derived from the ICR. 

Information collected directly from pulp 

and paper mills will have the greatest 

practical utility for purposes of 

performing the RTR and NSPS reviews 

as information from the affected 

industry will contain the most up-todate, accurate and reliable equipment 

and operational data for each mill. 

CAA section 114(a) states that the 

Administrator may require any owner or 

operator subject to any requirement of 

this Act to: 

(A) Establish and maintain such records; 

(B) make such reports; (C) install, use, and 

maintain such monitoring equipment, and 

use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) 

sample such emissions (in accordance with 

such procedures or methods, at such 

locations, at such intervals, during such 

periods, and in such manner as the 

Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep 

records on control equipment parameters, 

production variables or other indirect data 

when direct monitoring of emissions is 

impractical; (F) submit compliance 

certifications in accordance with section 

114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other 

information as the Administrator may 

reasonably require. 

At present, the EPA does not have a 

database reflecting the post-MACT and 

post-effluent guidelines configurations 

of pulp and paper emission units and 

air pollution control systems. It is 

essential for the EPA to have updated 

information to use in the regulatory 

analyses required under CAA sections 

112(d) and 112(f)(2). In addition, this 

updated information will be used to 

perform the NSPS review required 

under CAA section 111(b). By 

conducting all of the CAA-required 

reviews at the same time (i.e., the 

subpart S and MM RTR reviews and the 

subpart BB NSPS review), the Agency 

can make use of a single collection of 

information that would allow the 

Agency to consider control strategies 

that are the most effective for both HAP 

and criteria air pollutants (such as PM, 

SO2, and NOX) that are regulated under 

NSPS. The data would also allow the 

Agency to evaluate compliance options 

for startup and shutdown periods, and 

to consider ways to consolidate 

monitoring, reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements among the 

different rules under review. 

The data collected will be used to 

update facility information and 

equipment configuration, develop new 

estimates of the population of affected 

units, and identify the control measures 

and alternative emission limits being 

used for compliance with the existing 

rules that are under review. This 

information, along with existing 

permitted emission limits, will be used 

to establish a baseline for purposes of 

the regulatory reviews. The emissions 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 23, 2010 / Notices 35795 

test data (test reports and Continuous 

Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) 

data) collected will be used to verify the 

performance of existing control 

measures, examine variability in 

emissions, evaluate emission limits, and 

to determine the performance of 

superior control measures considered 

for purposes of reducing residual risk or 

as options for best demonstrated 

technology under the NSPS review. 

Emissions data will also be used along 

with process and emission unit details 

to consider subcategories for further 

regulation and to estimate the 

environmental and cost impacts 

associated with any regulatory options 

considered. 

This collection of information is 

mandatory under CAA section 114 (42 

U.S.C. 7414). All information submitted 

to EPA pursuant to this ICR for which 

a claim of confidentiality is made is 

safeguarded according to Agency 

policies in 40 CFR part 2, subpart B. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and 

a person is not required to respond to, 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. Office of Management and 

Budget control numbers for EPA’s 

regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 

CFR part 9. 

The EPA would like to solicit 

comments to: 

(i) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

Agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

(iii) Enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(iv) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated electronic, 

mechanical or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology (e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses). 

Burden Statement: The projected cost 

and hour burden for industry for this 

one-time collection of information is 

$12,098,137 and 127,906 hours. This 

burden is based on an estimated 386 

respondents to the survey. This ICR 

does not include any requirements that 

would cause the respondents to incur 

either capital or start-up costs. 

Operation and maintenance costs of 

$2,316 are estimated for postage to mail 

in the survey response to EPA. Burden 

means the total time, effort or financial 

resources expended by persons to 

generate, maintain, retain or disclose or 

provide information to, or for a federal 

agency. This includes the time needed 

to review instructions; develop, acquire, 

install and utilize technology and 

systems for the purposes of collecting, 

validating and verifying information, 

processing and maintaining information 

and disclosing and providing 

information; adjust the existing ways to 

comply with any previously applicable 

instructions and requirements which 

have subsequently changed; train 

personnel to be able to respond to a 

collection of information; search data 

sources; complete and review the 

collection of information; and transmit 

or otherwise disclose the information. 

The ICR provides a detailed 

explanation of the Agency’s estimate, 

which is only briefly summarized here. 

Estimated total number of potential 

respondents: 386 facilities. 

Frequency of response: One time. 

Estimated total average number of 

responses for each respondent: 1. 

Estimated total annual burden hours: 

127,906. 

Estimated total annual costs: 

$12,100,453. This includes an estimated 

burden cost of 12,098,137 and an 

estimated cost of $2,316 for capital 

investment or maintenance and 

operational costs. 

What is the next step in the process for 

this ICR? 

EPA will consider the comments 

received and amend the ICR as 

appropriate. The final ICR package will 

then be submitted to OMB for review 

and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 

1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue 

another Federal Register notice 

pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to 

announce the submission of the ICR to 

OMB and the opportunity to submit 

additional comments to OMB. If you 

have any questions about this ICR or the 

approval process, please contact the 

technical person listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Steve Fruh, 

Acting Director, Sector Policies and Programs 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–15221 Filed 6–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0982; FRL–9167–2] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to OMB for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; Information Requirements for 

Importation of Nonconforming 

Vehicles (Renewal); EPA ICR No. 

0010.12, OMB Control No. 2060–0095 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document 

announces that an Information 

Collection Request (ICR) has been 

forwarded to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for review and 

approval. This is a request to renew an 

existing approved collection. The ICR, 

which is abstracted below, describes the 

nature of the information collection and 

its estimated burden and cost. 

DATES: Additional comments may be 

submitted on or before July 23, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2009–0982, to (1) EPA online 

using http://www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method), or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air and Radiation 

Docket, Mailcode 6102T, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to: 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer 

for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20503. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Good, Compliance and Innovative 

Strategies Division, Office of 

Transportation and Air Quality, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 

Traverwood, Ann Arbor, Michigan 

48105; telephone number: 734–214– 

4450; fax number: 734–214–4869; e-mail 

address: good.david@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has 

submitted the following ICR to OMB for 

review and approval according to the 

procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. 

On January 22, 2010 (75 FR 3724), EPA 

sought comments on this ICR pursuant 

to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no 

comments during the comment period. 

Any additional comments on this ICR 

should be submitted to EPA and OMB 

within 30 days of this notice. 

EPA has established a public docket 

for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA– 

HQ–OAR–2009–0982, which is 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES