alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Andrew J. Murray, an Attorney.

[52 NYS3d 241]

Per Curiam.

Andrew J. Murray was admitted to practice by this Court in 2008 and lists a business address in Providence, Rhode Island with the Office of Court Administration. Murray now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons *(see*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department advises that it does not oppose Murray’s application.

Upon reading the affidavit of Murray sworn to November 8, 2016, and upon reading the correspondence in response by the *1538Chief Attorney for the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined that Murray is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant his application and accept his resignation.

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that Andrew J. Murray’s application for permission to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further ordered that Andrew J. Murray’s name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court (see *generally*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]); and it is further ordered that, effective immediately, Andrew J. Murray is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Murray is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further ordered that Andrew J. Murray shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15523]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. MT98-12-000]


Western Gas Interstate; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

June 5, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 1, 1998, Western Gas Interstate (WGI) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be effective July 1, 
1998:

First Revised Sheet No. 114
First Revised Sheet No. 159
First Revised Sheet No. 237
First Revised Sheet No. 240
First Revised Sheet No. 241
First Revised Sheet No. 242
First Revised Sheet No. 294
First Revised Sheet No. 343
First Revised Sheet No. 365

    WGI states that the revised tariff sheets reflect changes in (1) 
the company's address, and (2) the marketing affiliate information in 
compliance with Order No. 497.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15523 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 09-11276.

#### Jose Rafael Guerra, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 871, 131 S. Ct. 171,

178 L. Ed. 2d 102,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7111.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 569.
<PAGE>

                                Exhibit 10.42.3


                              [DURECT LETTERHEAD]


                                                               November 22, 2004

BY FACSIMILE AND EXPRESS MAIL
CONFIDENTIAL
Peter A. Lankau
President
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
100 Painters Drive
Chadds Ford, PA  19317

Re: Amendment 2 to Development, Commercialization and Supply License Agreement

Dear Peter:

Reference is made to the Development, Commercialization and Supply License
Agreement between Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Endo) and DURECT Corporation
(DURECT) effective November 8, 2002, as amended effective January 28, 2004
(Agreement). Effective on the date written above, Endo and DURECT hereby agree
to amend the Agreement as follows:

         1.       Amendment to Section 4.6(a). Section 4.6(a) of the Agreement
                  shall be amended to replace each instance of January 1, 2005
                  with January 1, 2006.

         2.       Amendment to Section 4.6(c). Section 4.6(c) of the Agreement
                  shall be amended to replace each instance of January 1, 2005
                  with January 1, 2006.

         3.       Amendment to Section 13.3(e). Section 13.3(e) of the Agreement
                  shall be amended to replace January 1, 2005 with January 1,
                  2006 and January 31, 2005 with January 31, 2006.

Except as set forth above, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain the
same. Please sign below to indicate Endos agreement to the foregoing.

                                                Very truly yours,

                                                /S/ JAMES E. BROWN

                                                James E. Brown
                                                President and CEO



AGREED TO BY ENDO:

By:  /S/ PETER A. LANKAU
    ------------------------
        Peter A. Lankau
        President

Date: Nov. 22, 2004
### DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY

Air Quality Program

January 8, 2008

TO: Jay J . Manning

, Director

Department of Ecology

FROM: Sarah Rees, Section Manager

Program Develpoment Section

THROUGH: Stu Clark , Program Manager

Air Quality Program

SUBJECT: S tate Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal ; Puget Sound 8

- Hour Ozone Maintenance

Plan (the Plan)

I am requesting your approval to submit the Plan to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for

approval as a revision to the Washington SIP

. A briefing pap er about the Plan is attached for your

information along with a transmittal letter and adoption order for your signature. We would be happy to

supply a copy of the Plan upon request.

Please return the signed documents to the Air Quality Program for assem bly of the submittal package

for EPA. If you have further questions about this submittal request, please contact Doug Schneider at

407

- 68 74 . Thank you.

Attachments
#### Clarke v Verizon N.Y., Inc.

1st Dept: 138 AD3d 505

denied
#### In the Matter of Corey J. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Corey J., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[68 NYS3d 443]

Order of fact-finding and disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Robert D. Hettleman, J.), entered on or about June 22, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, found that respondent father neglected the oldest of the subject children and derivatively neglected the others, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly found that petitioner Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the father neglected the oldest child and derivatively neglected the other children, based on the testimony of an ACS child protective specialist and the mother, the medical records, and the father’s admissions *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [A], [B]; *Nicholson v Scoppetta,*3 NY3d 357, 368 [2004]). The medical records and the testimony of the child protective specialist and the mother reflect a long-standing pattern of domestic violence by the father against the mother, in the presence of the children, and the use of excessive corporal punishment on the oldest child. Although the father denied engaging in such conduct and attributed the violence to the mother, he admitted grabbing her by the throat and “popping” the child on the hand. The hospital records reflected that the oldest child was afraid of the father and trained hospital personnel did not find that this fear was feigned.

*450The father argues that the oldest child’s statements were vague, failed to indicate when the events took place, and were not sufficiently corroborated. Out of court statements of a child are admissible “and, if properly corroborated, will support a finding of abuse or neglect” *(Matter of Nicole*V., 71 NY2d 112, 118 [1987]; *see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [vi]). Family Court judges have “considerable discretion” to determine whether a child’s out of court statements describing neglect have been corroborated (see *Matter of Christina F.,*74 NY2d 532, 536 [1989]).

The child’s statements were sufficiently corroborated in that the parents both testified that the incidents he described actually occurred, although the father disputed the child’s account of what transpired. Moreover, the child’s statements, which were reflected in the medical records, were consistent with the testimony of the child protective specialist and the mother regarding the domestic violence and excessive corporal punishment by the father.

The court correctly concluded that the father’s use of excessive corporal punishment on the child, which was supported by the record, demonstrated a flawed understanding of his parental duty such that the younger children were derivatively neglected by him and were at risk of harm *(see Matter of Angie G. [Jose D.G.],*111 AD3d 404, 404-405 [1st Dept 2013]).

Concur—Renwick, J.R, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Kahn and Singh, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14976]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 98-077]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of agency report forms under OMB review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Reporting requirements under NASA 
contracts to effectively manage, administer, and ensure compliance with 
the terms of the contract.

DATES: All comments should be submitted on or before August 4, 1998.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Mr. Richard Kall, Code 
HK, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 
20546-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carmela Simonson, NASA Reports 
Officer, (202) 358-1223.
    Title: NASA Acquisition Process Reports required under contracts 
with a value less than 500k.
    OMB Number: 2700-0088.
    Type of review: Extension.
    Need and Uses: Information is used by NASA procurement and 
technical personnel in the management of contracts: evaluate contractor 
management systems; ensure compliance with mandatory public policy 
provisions; evaluate and control costs charged against contracts; 
detect and minimize conditions conductive to fraud, waste and abuse: to 
form a database for general overview reports to the Congressional and 
Executive Branches.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit 
institutions, State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Number of Respondents: 1,282.
    Responses Per Respondent: 30.
    Annual Responses: 38,460.
    Hours Per Request: 27\1/2\ hrs.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,065,600.
    Frequency of Report: On occasion.
Donald J. Andreotta,
Deputy Chief Information Officer (Operations), Office of the 
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-14976 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
2017-1363.

#### State v. Fetherolf.

Union App. No. 14^-16-10, 2017-Ohio-1316. Reported at 151 Ohio St.3d 1458, 2017-Ohio-8842, 87 N.E.3d 224. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
No. 09-10485.

#### Hector Rivera, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 844, 131 S. Ct. 83,

178 L. Ed. 2d 53,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5843.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
No. 10-5079.

#### Alan E. Gurski, Petitioner v. T. C. Outlaw, Warden.

562 U.S. 902, 131 S. Ct. 238,

178 L. Ed. 2d 158,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6401.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 770.
No. 10-45.

#### Robert A. Stonerock, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 891, 131 S. Ct. 248,

178 L. Ed. 2d 138,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6255.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 338.
#### Daniel Santos, Appellant, v Daniello Carting Co., LLC, et al., Respondents.

[48 NYS3d 663]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth González, J.), entered August 10, 2016, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants’ motions for summary judgment were properly granted in this action where plaintiff was injured when he tripped over a metal plate that was installed by defendant Refuse Hydraulics (Refuse) to stabilize a dumpster owned by *464defendant Daniello Carting Co., Inc. (Daniello). There is no dispute that defendants did not own or manage the property where plaintiff fell and thus, had no duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition (cf. *Basso v Miller,*40 NY2d 233, 241 [1976]).

Plaintiff’s argument that defendants were liable because they launched a force or instrumentality of harm *(see Espinal v Melville Snow Contrs.,*98 NY2d 136, 140 [2002]) is unavailing. No evidence was presented that either defendant determined the placement of the dumpster and metal plate, or that they made the area less safe than it was before they acted *(see Stiver v Good & Fair Carting & Moving, Inc.,*9 NY3d 253, 257 [2007]). The metal plate installed by Refuse was not damaged and there was no evidence of prior accidents or complaints about it. Furthermore, although Daniello removed the dumpster and exposed the metal plate, no evidence was presented that this conduct rendered the area less safe.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.
# Jhunar Medenilla joins the PaCE program

/ Published Dec. 4, 2019
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
                Jhunar Medenilla                            Jhunar Medenilla is assigned to the DLA Pathways to Career Excellence (PaCE) Program as a Property Disposal Specialist with Environmental duties and will be assigned to Kuwait after completion of Phase One of the program.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Jace ArmstrongVIRIN: 191203-D-OS362-003Jhunar Medenilla is assigned to the DLA Pathways to Career Excellence Program as a Property Disposal Specialist with Environmental duties and will be assigned to Kuwait after completion of Phase One of the program.

Medenilla was released early from deployment with the Disposition Services Afghanistan, Bagram Site, where he was a part of the Expeditionary Disposal Remediation Team. Prior to that, he volunteered to deploy with Disposition Services Qatar for one year in order to gain more knowledge and experience within the agency.

Medenilla has a total of 15 years of combined active/reserve military service and is still maintaining his Navy Reserve commitment with Joint Forces Reserve Team, Land & Maritime, as a Customer Account Specialist.

In his free time, Medenilla enjoys movies, Netflix, along with training for and participating in obstacle course racing, marathons, and ultramarathons. 

                Navy Petty Officer Second Class Jhunar Medenilla, a new PACE member, performs an ammo abatement inspection on a vehicle during his recent deployment to DLA Disposition Services site at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan.                            Hands on training                            Navy Petty Officer Second Class Jhunar Medenilla, a new PACE member, performs an ammo abatement inspection on a vehicle during his recent deployment to DLA Disposition Services site at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Robert O’Hagan VIRIN: 190808-D-D0441-001

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32029-32030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-130-1020-00; GP8-0216]


Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council Tour and Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District.

ACTION: Tour and meeting of the Eastern Washington Resource Advisory 
Council; June 25, 1998, beginning and ending in Spokane, Washington.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A tour of Bureau of Land Management recreation sites and 
meeting of the Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council will be 
held on June 25, 1998. The tour and meeting will convene at 8:00 a.m., 
at the Spokane District Office of the Bureau of

[[Page 32030]]

Land Management, 1103 N. Fancher, Spokane, Washington, 99212. The tour 
and meeting will conclude at 5:00 p.m. or upon completion of the tour 
at the Spokane BLM office. Public comments will be heard from 12:30 
p.m. until 1:00 p.m. at BLM's Lakeview Ranch tour stop.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Hubbard, Bureau of Land Management, Spokane District Office, 
1103 N. Fancher Road, Spokane, Washington, 99212; or call 509-536-1200.

    Dated: June 5, 1998.
Gary J. Yeager,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-15620 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14726]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE


Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

AGENCY: General Accounting Office.

ACTION: Notice of meeting on June 25.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board will hold a regular meeting 
on Thursday, June 25, 1998, from 9:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. in Room 5N30 
(not 7C13) of the General Accounting Office building, 441 G St., N.W., 
Washington, D.C. (A public hearing on Property, Plant, and Equipment, 
notice of which is separately published in the Federal Register, is 
scheduled for the following day, June 26.)
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the following issues: (1) 
Credit Reform, (2) Management's Discussion and Analysis, (3) the 
Internal Revenue Service's request for amendments to the Accounting for 
Revenue and Other Financing Sources Standard, and (4) the addition of 
new projects to the Board's agenda for 1998.
    Any interested person may attend the meeting as an observer. Board 
discussions and reviews are open to the Public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy Comes, Executive Director, 441 G 
St., N.W., Room 3B18, Washington, D.C. 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. 92-463, 
Section 10(a)(2), 86 Stat. 770, 774 (1972) (current version at 5 
U.S.C. app. section 10(a)(2) (1988); 41 CFR 101-6.1015 (1990).

    Dated: May 29, 1998.
Wendy M. Comes,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-14726 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
No. 09-1023.

#### Apex Oil Company, Inc., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 827, 131 S. Ct. 67,

178 L. Ed. 2d 23,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6286.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 579 F.3d 734.
No. 09-11411.

#### Randall Williams, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 879, 131 S. Ct. 193,

178 L. Ed. 2d 116,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6644.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, denied.

Same case below, 24 So. 3d 729.
No. 10-5059.

#### Michael Lee Gordon, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 901, 131 S. Ct. 235,

178 L. Ed. 2d 156,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6164.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
★

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

October 7, 1994.

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 2100) entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for rural development, multiple-use

management, expenditures under the Knutson-Vandenberg

Act of 1930, and ecosystem-based management of certain forest lands, and for other purposes’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENTS:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1 SECTION 1. DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM FOR THE SPECIAL

2 USE OF TIMBER REVENUES.

3 (a) DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Ag4 riculture may carry out a demonstration program on Na5 tional Forest System lands described in subsection (b) to

6 develop and implement management practices that are eco7 system based and end-result oriented.

8 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The demonstration program

9 shall apply to the management of the Priest Lake District

10 project, Idaho Panhandle National Forest.

11 (c) AUTHORIZATION.—Under the demonstration pro12 gram, the Secretary of Agriculture may apply the value,

13 or a portion of the value, of timber removed under a stew14 ardship end result contract as an offset against the cost of

15 stewardship services received, including site preparation,
2

S 2100 EAH1S

1 replanting, silviculture programs, recreation, wildlife habi2 tat enhancement, and other multiple-use enhancements. The

3 Secretary of Agriculture may apply such offsets until the

4 demonstration project expires.

5 (d) COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIRE6 MENTS.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to alter the

7 responsibility of the Secretary to comply with environ8 mental laws applicable to the lands of the National Forest

9 System described in subsection (b).

10 (e) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority pro11 vided in subsection (c) shall expire on December 31, 1995.

Amend the title so as to read: An Act to provide for

a demonstration program to develop and implement special management practices for certain National Forest

System lands.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2100

AMENDMENTS