alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-933-98-1320-01; COC 61945]


Colorado; Notice of Invitation for Coal Exploration License 
Application, Bowie Resources Limited

    Pursuant to the Mineral Leasing Act of February 25, 1920, as 
amended, and to Title 43, Code of Federal Regulations, Subpart 3410, 
members of the public are hereby invited to participate with Bowie 
Resources Limited in a program for the exploration of unleased coal 
deposits owned by the United States of America in the following 
described lands located in Delta County, Colorado:

T. 12 S., R. 91 W., 6th P.M.
    Sec. 12. lots 7, 8, S\1/2\S\1/2\, NE\1/4\SW\1/4\, NW\1/4\SE\1/
4\;
    Sec. 22, S\1/2\;
    Sec. 23, lots 1 to 7, inclusive, W\1/2\, and that part of HES 
No. 133 lying in the S\1/2\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 26, lots 1 to 5, inclusive, W\1/2\, N\1/2\SE\1/4\, and that 
part of HES No. 133 lying in the NE\1/4\;
    Sec. 27, all;
    Sec. 28, S\1/2\;
    Sec. 29, SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 32, lots 1, 2, 7 to 10, inclusive, lots 15, 16, and NE\1/
4\;
    Sec. 33, lots 1 to 16, inclusive, and N\1/2\;
    Sec. 34, lots 1 to 16, inclusive, and N\1/2\;
    Sec. 35, lots 3, and 7 to 22, inclusive, NE\1/4\NW\1/4\, W\1/
2\NW\1/4\, that part of HES No. 134 and that part of lots 4 to 6, 
inclusive, lying in the S\1/2\S\1/2\NE\1/4\.

    The area described contains approximately 6,053.00 acres.

    The application for coal exploration license is available for 
public inspection during normal business hours under serial number COC 
61945 at the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Colorado State Office, 
2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood. Colorado 80215, and at the Montrose 
District Office, 2465 South Townsend Avenue, Montrose, Colorado 81401.
    Written Notice of Intent to Participate should be addressed to the 
attention of the following persons and must be received by them within 
30 days after publication of this Notice of Invitation in the Federal 
Register:

Karen Purvis; Solid Minerals Team, Resource Services, Colorado State 
Office, Bureau of Land Management, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, 
Colorado 80215

    and

Bowie Resources Limited, P.O. Box 483, Paonia, Colorado 81428.

    Any party electing to participate in this program must share all 
costs on a pro rata basis with Bowie Resources Limited and with any 
other party or parties who elect to participate.

    Dated June 3, 1998.
Karen Purvis,
Solid Minerals Team, Resource Services.
[FR Doc. 98-15644 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
No. 09-11510.

#### Anthony T. Tanker, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 885, 131 S. Ct. 212,

178 L. Ed. 2d 127,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6890.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 554.
**Exhibit23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-113094 on Form S-8, Post Effective Amendment No.1 to Registration Statement No. 333-113094 on Form S-8, Registration StatementNo. 333-119928 on Form S-3, Post Effective Amendment No. 5 to RegistrationStatement No: 333-115816 to Form S-1 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No.333-139475 on Form S-8 of our reports dated August 31, 2007, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Bioenvision, Inc. and subsidiaries andBioenvision, Inc.’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of Bioenvision, Inc. as of June 30, 2007 included in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Bioenvision, Inc. for the year ended June 30,2007.
|   | /s/ J.H. Cohn LLP     |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|   |                  |
|   | Roseland, New  Jersey |
|   | September 7,  2007    |

 

----
No. 09-10670.

#### Lonzie Earl Nichols, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

562 U.S. 849, 131 S. Ct. 97,

178 L. Ed. 2d 61,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5836.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.

Same case below, 27 So. 3d 433.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|In connection with the Annual Report of Michigan Heritage Bancorp (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Anthony S. Albanese, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                        
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|               |                                                                          
|-------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               | /s/Anthony S. Albanese
Anthony S. Albanese
Acting Chief Financial Officer
|              
|March 10, 2003

54
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 12, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00244

- CV

SIG GROUP ENT. LLC

, Appellant

v.

MWJI, LLC

, Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 21171

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

On June 20, 2016, appellee filed a Motion to Dismiss Accelerated Appeal as Moot and

appellant filed a response

. The M otion to Dismiss is hereby CARRIED WITH THE APP EAL

.

Appellee also filed an unopposed motion to extend time to file its brief. The motion is

GRANTED and appellee is hereby ORDERED to file its brief no later than Augu st 1, 2016

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Ch ief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of July, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hot tle

Clerk of Court
No. 12-8857.

#### Desadier *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
2017-0723.

#### Rock v. Bracy.

In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. On application for default judgment. Application denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
**Table A-1. Plant-Level Bottom Ash Adjustment Factor for Option 4a Based on Oil-Fired Units and Units 400 MW or Less Not Installing the Technology Basis** 

**Plant ID Adjustment Factor**  1 0 34 0 103 0.670035957 124 0 174 0 189 0 2160.680999111 263 0 548 0 556 1 635 0 6540.570066051 664 0 693 0 737 1 771 0 9280.627462907 942 0 1020 0 1199 0 1206 0 1236 1 1365 0 1381 1 1402 1 1435 0 1493 1 1516 0 1533 0 1572 0 1634 1 1647 0 1657 0 1671 1 1761 0 1963 1 2079 1 2149 0 2188 0 2239 1 2244 1 2268 1 2269 1 2297 0 2314 0 2317 0**Table A-1. Plant-Level Bottom Ash Adjustment Factor for Option 4a Based on Oil-Fired Units and Units 400 MW or Less Not Installing the Technology Basis** 

2326 1 2334 1 2383 0 2420 0 2482 1 2550 0 2601 1 2612 0 2700 0 2702 0 2740 0 2851 0 2966 0 3015 0 3018 0 3024 0 3087 0 3095 0 3097 0 3123 0.442955151 3146 0 3157 0 3191 0.704315886 3196 1 3235 1 3309 0 3373 0 3433 0 3464 1 3561 0 3567 0 35970.578439965 36040.609449665 3624 0 3648 0 36720.695821929 3709 0 3719 1 3793 0 3831 1 3887 1 3951 1 3977 0 3978 1 39970.888509464 4011 1 4083 0**Table A-1. Plant-Level Bottom Ash Adjustment Factor for Option 4a Based on Oil-Fired Units and Units 400 MW or Less Not Installing the Technology Basis** 

41220.742604776 4161 0 4242 0 4257 0 4495 0 4524 0 4533 1 4543 1 4547 1 4585 0 4598 1 4599 0.72998288 4624 0 4676 0 46790.421684261 4683 0 47020.387306471 4706 1 4711 0 4978 0 4993 0.588952112 5015 0 5038 1 5043 1 50520.647676162 5126 0 5169 0 5265 0 5283 0.344484853 5318 0 5570 0 5620 0 5743 1 5762 1 5802 0 58390.782538005 58720.738337211 5981 0 60460.336005483 6118 0 6176 0.88140887 63340.742526386 6368 0 63700.571245639 6419 0 65920.465587045 6596 1**Table A-1. Plant-Level Bottom Ash Adjustment Factor for Option 4a Based on Oil-Fired Units and Units 400 MW or Less Not Installing the Technology Basis** 

6606 1 6622 0 66340.686613508 6688 1 6689 1 6739 1 6816 0 6848 0.354775195 6894 0 6914 0 6929 0 6931 0 6933 1 69840.840161991 7063 0 7135 1 7256 1 7276 0 7301 0.270316581 7311 0 7354 1 7400 0 7411 0 7421 1 7434 1 7437 1 7483 0 7582 0 7587 1 7651 0.75742805 7727 0 7728 0 7761 0.652861208 7821 0 7884 1 7925 0 7980 0 8179 1 8213 0 8281 1 8308 0.75082597 8353 1 8405 0 8462 0 8471 0 8490 1 8502 0**Table A-1. Plant-Level Bottom Ash Adjustment Factor for Option 4a Based on Oil-Fired Units and Units 400 MW or Less Not Installing the Technology Basis** 

8659 0 8661 1 8750 1 8752 0 8753 1 8902 1 8905 0 8965 0 9120 0 9155 0 9161 1 9225 1 9289 1 9325 0.28459753 9373 0 9391 1 9412 1 9442 0 94540.981688254 9475 1 9621 1 9671 0 9692 0 9715 1 9805 1 9948 1 9971 0
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated March 11, 2003, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Health Grades, Inc. and Subsidiaries
included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2002. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in
the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-36933,
333-42986, 333-61717, and 333-82398).


GRANT THORNTON LLP


Denver, Colorado
April 11, 2003
Order filed November 10, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00319-CV

____________

GENEVA COLBERT, Appellant

V.

ORCHARD PARK AT WILLBROOK, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1058305

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due November 2, 2015. No brief or motion for 

extension of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before December 1, 2015, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00313-CV

United States Gypsum Co., Appellant

v.

William Osteen, Albert Gore and Hamer Long, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 96-05587, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING 

PER CURIAM

Appellant United States Gypsum Co. has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its

appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: August 30, 2001

Do Not Publish
No. 10-5337.

#### Jimmie Lee Hamilton, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 916, 131 S. Ct. 279,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7084.

178 L. Ed. 2d 184,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 33 So. 3d 37.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15501]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 25, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Frank P. Giltner III, Phoenix, Arizona; to acquire voting shares 
of The Avoca Company, Avoca, Nebraska, and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of Farmers State Bank of Nebraska, Bennet, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 5, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15501 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
ANTHONY KEEL

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5429

___________ __________________/

Opinion filed July 9, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Terry P. Lewis , Judge.

Anthony Keel , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle Denise Lylen

, Tallahassee, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
# DLA Distribution’s Eric McEldowney has been awarded the DLA Superior Civilian Service Award

/ Published Sept. 18, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Eric McEldowney, has been awarded the Defense Logistics Agency Superior Civilian Service Award.

During October 2018 to May 2019, McEldowney, DLA Distribution mobilizing planning specialist, was instrumental in coordinating the DLA support efforts of multiple Defense Department units assisting with Customs and Border Protection operations along the Southwest region of the U.S. border.

Through dedication and devotion to duty, McEldowney was pivotal in the coordinated efforts of multiple DLA organizations in support of a critical national interest operation.

Over the course of the operation, McEldowney supported multiple customers and organizations through coordinating meetings outside of normal operating hours, to include weekends and holidays.

As part of his duties, McEldowney coordinated the delivery of concertina wire, barbed wire, pickets, shipping containers, tents, personal protective equipment, map products and meals ready to eat, all in support of multiple DOD customers. These materials were key to the completion of a critical national interest to reinforce 16 key points of entry and construct over 200 miles of improvised fencing.

McEldowney’s unwavering presence and relationship building methods proved key to mission completion and keeping all levels of DLA and DOD leadership informed of the ongoing effort.

Information and data compiled by McEldowney was presented daily at the flag officer, general officer and Senior Executive Service level. Information from these briefings was also seen as high as the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland Security level.

For his actions, dedication, and unwavering support of the warfighter McEldowney is most deserving of the DLA Superior Civilian Service Award.
#### People v Carlo

1st Dept: 146 AD3d 681

denied*
No. 09-11177.

#### James William Londo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 865, 131 S. Ct. 153,

178 L. Ed. 2d 92,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6627.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 366 Fed. Appx. 836.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6547

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LIONEL RAY HAIRSTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (7:98-cr-00097-sgw-1)

Submitted: June 13, 2008 Decided: June 27, 2008

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lionel Ray Hairston, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lionel Ray Hairston appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), seeking a

reduction to his sentence based on an amendment to the Sentencing

Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we find the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357

F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject

to the discretion of the district court”); United States v. Legree,

205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Principal Accounting Officer**
I, Joseph W. Meyers, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pierre Foods, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: January 18, 2005 /s/ Joseph W. Meyers    Joseph W. Meyers  *Vice President, Finance*  (Principal Accounting Officer)
35
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2013

t0722 

# Order

Clerk 

### July 30, 2013

146839

In re

SC: 146839

DYLAN MA RCELLIS KALLABAT COA: 310332

Oakland CC: 2010

- 775275

- DL

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 31, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.