alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 13.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted), Peter A. J. Gardiner, the Executive Chairman of the
Board of Directors of Zindart Limited (the "Company"), and Ken Fowler, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

            1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
            ended March 31, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as
            Exhibit 13.1 (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
            in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at
            the end of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of
            operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual
            Report.

/s/ Peter A. J. Gardiner                        /s/ Ken Fowler
---------------------------------               --------------------------------
Peter A. J. Gardiner                            Ken Fowler
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors    Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  October 8, 2003
|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Banco Santander-Chile. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:      | /s/ Claudio Melandri |                    |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------|
|                              | Name:                | Claudio Melandri        |   |
|                              |                 | Chief Executive Officer |   |

| By:      | /s/ Gabriel Montoya |                    |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|
|                              | Name:               | Gabriel Montoya         |   |
|                              |                | Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
Adams, Kevin (OSn 

From: 

Sent: 

Ta,: 

Subject: 

Mr. Adams: 

Matt Mitchell <mjmitchell98@gmail.com> 

Friday, June 01, 2012 7:39 AM 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Support for Sky West Airlines -- i 

I support the effort to award Sky West Airlines the Essential Air Service contract in Alpena. I have read every 

proposal submitted and this is the one that makes the best sense for Alpena. Any other proposal would be a 

huge step backwards in the progress this airport has been making. The Sky West proposal offers a product that 

people will continue to use, in growing numbers. The economic vitality of this region hinges on reliable air 

service in and out of Alpena. The other communities in Michigan who have been awarded contracts with 

regional carriers similar to Sky West would agree that regional jet service to and from code sharing hubs is the 

only way to go. With Sky West, our businesses, our senior citizens, and our community in general will have a 

win-win product. Sky West is a wise investment of Essential Air Service dollars. 

Sincerely, 

Matt Mitchell 

Alpena, MI 

1
# Troop Support showcases workforce talent  

/ Published Sept. 25, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support skills were on full display as six employees competed in a talent show on Sept. 21. The organization’s Culture Program and Culture Improvement Teams hosted the event to encourage employee participation in the 2023 DLA Culture Climate Survey. 

Entering the auditorium with matching hard hats and glittered glasses, Troop Support Commander Army Col. Landis Maddox, Deputy Commander Kishayra J. Lambert, Executive Director William Kenny and Chief of Staff Robert Ratner, served as judges for the competition and provided detailed feedback after each performance.   

In a filled auditorium, audience members were treated to vocal, instrumental, turntable spinning and poetry reading performances. The audience was actively involved as people sang and danced along.   

“This was such a fun event! I enjoyed seeing each of the performers and realizing how much talent the DLA Troop support family has,” said U.S. Air Force Logistics Management Specialist Nicole Sheleva.  

Winner of the event, Procurement Process Support Office Business Process Analyst Roseanne Sarkissian, performed on the piano to a standing ovation by the crowd. Roseanne, who is planning her retirement from DLA, is looking forward to “include more students, more gigs and being able to practice for hours without interruptions!”  

Maddox expressed his appreciation of Sarkissian’s performance.  

“I closed my eyes and I was in New Orleans on Bourbon Street having a brown beverage and listening to some nice jazz,” he said. 

Other winners include Supply System Analyst, LaTosha Wray, in second place and Tailored Vendor Logistics Specialists, Jason Kelleher and Chuck Zerambo coming in third.   

DLA provides employees the opportunity to participate in the Culture Climate Survey every 18-24 months to get feedback on necessary improvements within the organization.  

“For over 15 years, the DLA Culture Climate Survey has resulted in the establishment of many long-standing Troop Support Programs,” said DLA Troop Support Management and Program Analyst Kimberly Maund, who served as emcee of the event.  

Employees are encouraged to make their voice heard in this year’s survey. The 2023 DLA Culture Climate Survey is open until Sept. 30.  

For those who were unable to attend Troop Support’s Got Talent, or to relive all the fun, streaming is available here.
#### Joan H. Mendez et al., Respondents, v 21 West 86th Street LLC et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[49 NYS3d 299]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Gerald Lebovits, J.), entered on or about February 19, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the portion of defendants 21 West 86th Street LLC and Adellco Management, LLC’s CPLR 3212 motion that sought dismissal of plaintiffs’ second and third causes of action in the amended complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and that part of the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiffs alleged in their second cause of action that defendants breached their promise to provide building-wide systems to the rent-stabilized tenants of the building. However, plaintiffs failed to submit any evidence that they had given any consideration in exchange for defendants’ alleged promise, and thus failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether they had a binding contract with defendants (see *Presbyterian Church of Albany v Cooper,*112 NY 517, 520 [1889]; *Delor Corp. v Quigley, Langer, Hames, Perlmutter, Mankes & Nuskind, Partnership,*287 AD2d 680, 682 [2d Dept 2001]).

*652The record refutes the third cause of action’s allegations that defendants removed the building’s rooftop garden and denied plaintiffs’ access to it. The record demonstrates that defendants renovated the rooftop garden and the recreational area on the roof for the benefit of the tenants.

We have considered the other arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
#### People v Dobbs

3d Dept: 138 AD3d 1352 (Albany)

denied 8/24/16 (DiFiore, Ch. J.)
No. 09-1327.

#### Missouri, Petitioner v. Mark Anthony Gill.

562 U.S. 946, 131 S. Ct. 83,

178 L. Ed. 2d 241,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7684.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.

Same case below, 300 S.W.3d 225.
2017-1548.

#### Wayt v. DHSC, L.L.C.

Stark App. No. 2016CA00215, 2017-Ohio-7734. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Michael 0. Fawaz. Motion granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days.
No. 09-10836.

#### Bobby Len Franklin, Petitioner v. BWD Properties 2, LLC, et al.

562 U.S. 803, 131 S. Ct. 113,

178 L. Ed. 2d 4,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7787.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 956.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 22, 2016

t0615

Order 

Clerk

June 22, 2016

153113

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153113

COA: 328890 

Calhoun CC: 2012-002654-FH

JOSEPH EDWARD-JARED ROTHWELL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2015 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted.
No. 09-11532.

#### Shenez Lawrence, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 886, 131 S. Ct. 216,

178 L. Ed. 2d 130,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6760.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 190.
No. 10-147.

#### Thomas G. Wayland, Petitioner v. Charles F. McVay, United States Trustee.

562 U.S. 895, 131 S. Ct. 323,

178 L. Ed. 2d 146,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6156.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 837.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW INCLUDED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,932,008
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,341,993
<PP&E>                                      16,254,667
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,216,911)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,948,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,102,625
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       28,098,983
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,465
<OTHER-SE>                                 (10,638,493)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,948,463
<SALES>                                         97,879
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,879
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,020,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (185,845)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (16,737,046)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (16,737,046)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (17,237,046)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.12)


</TABLE>
No. 10-6000.

#### Allan DiMarco, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 943, 131 S. Ct. 365,

178 L. Ed. 2d 235,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7436.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
1

Sutton, Tia

From: Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov

Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:13 PM

To: Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov; Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov

Cc: james.tamm@dot.gov; Sutton, Tia; Hengst, Benjamin; Spears, Matthew

Subject: FW: HD FE GHG Phase 2 - RIA COMPARE to 060415 - SECOND HALF Ch 05-13

Attachments: Ch 05 Emission Impacts - Compare.docx; Ch 06 Health and Environmental Impacts - 

Compare.docx; Ch 07 Vehicle Program Costs - Compare.docx; Ch 08 Economic and 

Other Impacts - Compare.docx; Ch 09 Safety Impacts - Compare.docx; Ch 10 CAFE 

Model - Compare.docx; Ch 11 Results of Preferred and Alternative Standards - 

Compare.docx; Ch 12 Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis - Compare.docx; Ch 13 

Natural Gas Vehicles and Engines - Compare.docx

Importance: High

Good afternoon, 

Attached please find the second half of the redlined RIA, which shows changes relative to the June 4, 2015 versions that 

were sent to OIRA on June 5, 2015. Because of the large file size, could you please confirm that you have received this?

Thanks, 

Tim
#### Leonard SPIVAK v. COULTER ELECTRONICS, INC.

No. 87-6683-CIV.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division.

June 9, 1988.

Ronald T. Spann, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., for plaintiff.

Terence G. Connor, Miami, Fla., for defendant.

*898MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON PROPOSED INSTRUCTION

SPELLMAN, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court during a Jury Trial in this matter under the ADEA upon Plaintiff’s Motion that the Jury be instructed to calculate the amount of front pay to which the Plaintiff would have been entitled, should the Jury find for the Plaintiff and should the Court find that front pay was an equitably proper element of relief in this case. Inasmuch as the Jury found against the Plaintiff, the Court need not reach this issue.

The Court is of the opinion, however, after thoroughly researching the issue, that the law of this Circuit is clear. Had the Jury found for the Plaintiff and had the Court deemed the Plaintiff entitled to front pay as a matter of equity, the Court is of the opinion that the amount of such entitlement would have been a matter within the Court’s equitable discretion, rather than one for jury determination. The Court reaches this opinion relying on the case of *Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, Inc.,*758 F.2d 1435 (11th Cir.), *reh’g den.,*765 F.2d 154 (11th Cir.1985) and notes that, although the Court did not specifically so hold, the Court’s language in *Goldstein*strongly suggests this result. *See Dominic v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.,*822 F.2d 1249 (2d Cir.1987). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiffs proposed instruction is DENIED.
No. 10-5588.

#### William R. Berg, Petitioner v. Prison Health Services, et al.

562 U.S. 930, 131 S. Ct. 323,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7341.

178 L. Ed. 2d 210,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 723.
February 15, 1974 

The Honorable Wilson E. Speir 

Director 

Opinion No. H- 231 

Texas Department of Public Safety 

Box 4087 

Austin, Texas 78773 

Re: Whether deposition in 

court proceeding is subject 

to limitation of Open Records 

Act. 

Dear Colonel Speir: 

The head of the Personnel Department of the Department of Public 

Safety has been nerved by the defendant in a civil suit with a subpoena to 

give a deposition on written questions concerning the employment records 

of an individual who is plaintiff in the suit. The Department of Public Safety 

is not a party to the wit. 

Your letter requesting our advice an to whether the entire personnel 

record of your employee should be produced in answer to the questions cites 

5 3(a)(2) of Article 6252-17a, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, the Open Records 

Law. That subsection excepts from mandatory disclosure under the Act certain 

information in personnel files. 

The request for the information however, was not made under the Open 

Records Act. Rather, it was made pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure having to do with depositions (Ruler 189 to 198). Rule 177a. authorizing 

a subpoena duces tecum, authorizes the court in which the action is pending 

to quash or modify the subpoena if it is unreasonable or oppressive. 

Rule 186b authorizes the same court to enter a protective order limiting 

the scope of examination on a deposition on motion of a party or the deponent. 

Thus, if your department or the subject employee feels that the deposition and 

subpoena are reaching matters which are confidential and should not be revealed 

under compulsion, the Rules furnish the remedy and the Open Records Act does 

p. 1078 
The Honorable Wilson E. Speir, page 2 (H-231) 

not authorire thir office to issue any sort of directive that you should or 

should not obey the subpoena. 

We therefore advise you that, in determining howand to what extent 

a subpoena issued in a civil care should be obeyed, resort should be had 

to the protective devices provided by the Rules of Civil Procedure. The 

Open Records Act, Article 6252-17a, V. T. C. S. , does not apply to the situation. 

SUMMARY 

The Open Records Act and its exceptions have no 

bearing upon the scope of the testimony of a witness taken in 

a civil proceeding pursuant to a notice and subpoena issued 

under the Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Your8 very truly, 

Attorney General of Texas 

DAVID M. KENDALL. Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

p. 1079
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Patch International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Stadnyk, President, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

              /s/ David Stadnyk                                      

David Stadnyk

President, Secretary and Treasurer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7748

COREY LORENZO WOODFOLK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA02-3836) Submitted: February 11, 2005 Decided: March 2, 2005 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); seeReid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 368-69, 374 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Woodfolk has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Woodfolk’s motion to amend the pleadings, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Contingency IT Team supports Hurricane Laura response

/ Published Sept. 24, 2020
FORT BELVIOR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency’s Contingency Information Technology Team provided tactical communications for DLA Energy employees supporting Hurricane Laura response efforts in Louisiana through Sept. 12. Members of the team deployed to Fort Hood, Texas, to support DLA Energy’s expeditionary team, Task Force Americas, before the Category 4 hurricane made landfall Aug. 27.

CIT team members Jimmie Warren and John Trask moved DLA’s Mobile Emergency Response Center to Fort Hood from Warner Robins Air Force Base, Georgia. The MERC provides network connectivity for up to 20 devices regardless of local conditions.

Warren and Trask set up the MERC’s satellite and connected computers, phones and printers to enable communication between TFA and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

“I thought it went really smooth,” Trask said. “We’ve done this at our home base enough that it was second nature.” 

CIT support allowed TFA and FEMA to coordinate the arrival of fuel trucks before the hurricane made landfall just east of the Texas border in Louisiana. The trucks were there and ready to deploy to responders in the disaster area. 

“That’s the key to what we do – we’re always outside of the storm to provide close support for TFA and FEMA,” Warren said. 

The fuel support mission later moved to Lake Charles due to excessive damage in that area. DLA’s Mobile Command Vehicle, which has similar functions as the MERC but additional working space, relieved the MERC there. CIT team members John Wolk and Christina Kail took over operations and brought satellite communications online so TFA could resume fuel management. 

The CIT capability is critical to TFA’s ability to provide immediate response to warfighters and federal agencies, added Army Lt. Col. Julian Perez, commander of DLA Energy Americas East. 

“Without them, TFA is not able to communicate with our higher headquarters in an effective and efficient matter,” he said.