MEMORANDUM

TO: EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0830, National Emission Standards for 

Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities Risk and Technology Review

FROM: Kim Teal and Keith Barnett, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

DATE: January 21, 2015

SUBJECT: Determination of Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) for 

Specialty Coating Operations in the Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework 

Facilities Source Category

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) to establish technology-based standards for listed source categories. These 

technology-based standards are often referred to as maximum achievable control technology 

(MACT) standards. The Aerospace NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart GG) regulates hazardous 

air pollutant (HAP) emissions from facilities that are major sources of HAP and are engaged, 

either in part or in whole, in the manufacture or rework of commercial, civil, or military 

aerospace vehicles or components. 

Subpart GG currently requires the use of MACT to reduce HAP emissions from the 

following operations: cleaning; primer, topcoat and chemical milling maskant application; 

depainting; and waste storage and handling. The rule does not currently regulate the application 

of specialty coatings that are defined in Appendix A to subpart GG. Subpart GG defines a 

specialty coating as a coating that, even though it meets the definition of a primer, topcoat, or 

self-priming topcoat, has additional performance criteria beyond those of primers, topcoats, and 

self-priming topcoats for specific applications. These performance criteria may include, but are 

not limited to, temperature or fire resistance, substrate compatibility, antireflection, temporary 

protection or marking, sealing, adhesively joining substrates, or enhanced corrosion protection. 

There are 59 separate categories of specialty coatings that are defined in Appendix A to subpart 

GG.

The EPA is proposing to now regulate specialty coatings based on MACT. EPA is 

proposing to use the coating categories that are listed in Appendix A to subpart GG. These same 

coating categories are addressed in the control techniques guideline (CTG) document for 

aerospace manufacturing and rework (hereafter referred to as the Aerospace CTG).1

1 “Guideline Series: Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Coating Operations at Aerospace 

Manufacturing and Rework Operations.” Emission Standards Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, 

December 1997. Publication No. EPA-453/R-97-004.

www.erg.com

1

 
Section 112(d)(2) calls for the EPA to promulgate national technology-based emission 

standards for each category or subcategory of sources that is listed in accordance with 112(c). 

For “major sources” that emit or have the potential to emit any single HAP at a rate of 10 tons or 

more per year or any combination of HAP at a rate of 25 tons or more per year, these 

technology-based standards must reflect the maximum reductions of HAP achievable (after 

considering cost, energy requirements, and non-air health and environmental impacts) and are 

commonly referred to as MACT standards.

CAA section 112(d)(3) explicitly describes the minimum control level allowed for 

MACT standards – that is the minimum control level that may be deemed the maximum degree 

of achievable HAP reductions. The MACT floors for existing sources cannot be less stringent 

than the average emissions limitation achieved by the best performing 12 percent of sources in 

the category or subcategory (or by the best-performing five sources for categories or 

subcategories with fewer than 30 sources). For new sources, the MACT floor cannot be less 

stringent than the emission control that is achieved in practice by the best controlled similar 

source. In developing MACT standards, the EPA must also consider control options that are 

more stringent than the floor, commonly referred to as beyond-the-floor control options. The 

EPA may establish standards more stringent than the floor based on considerations of the cost of 

achieving the emissions reductions, any non-air quality health and environmental impacts and 

energy requirements.

Most aerospace coatings contain a mixture of organic solvents and/or inorganic HAP. 

The organic HAP emissions from the application of specialty coatings occurs from the 

evaporation of organic solvents during mixing, application, and drying. Emissions of inorganic 

HAP from spray-applied coating operations, typically metal compounds (e.g., lead, chromium, or 

cadmium compounds), occur when paint particles do not adhere to the surface being coated 

(a.k.a., overspray). The organic and inorganic emissions from coating application occur in large 

open areas, such as hangars, or partially or fully enclosed spaces, such as within spray booths. 

Section 2.0 of this memorandum presents a summary of the sources of data that were 

used to conduct the MACT analysis and Section 3.0 presents the MACT determination for 

specialty coating operations.

2.0 SOURCES OF AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION

In order to identify the best performing sources, the EPA collected information on control 

technologies and the emission limitations achieved by facilities with specialty coating operations 

in the aerospace industry. The EPA consulted the following sources of data: the EPA’s 

RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse, the California Statewide Best Available Control 

Technology (BACT) Clearinghouse, and regional and state regulations. 

In addition, as part of the risk and technology review (RTR) of the Aerospace NESHAP 

required by section 112(d)(6) of the CAA, the EPA sent out a comprehensive information 

collection request (ICR) to all known facilities in February 2011. The ICR requested information 

on material usage and control techniques used on all of the regulated and unregulated emission 

sources at aerospace facilities. 

2
Responses to the ICR were received from 109 facilities using specialty coatings. The ICR 

data represented almost 5,000 different applications of specialty coatings (i.e., the use of a 

separate specialty coating formulation at a separate aerospace facility).

2.1 2011 ICR Data for Specialty Coatings

Information from the 2011 ICR submittals was used to identify facilities with specialty 

coating operations. The data were reported on Form C-1, Coatings. These coating data included 

total volume of coating for each formulation, physical property data (as-applied), specialty 

coating type, HAP name, and HAP content and whether the coating was applied in a spray booth. 

We applied the following filters to the C-1 data of the ICR to remove materials that were not 

specialty coatings:

• Removed materials that were reported in the survey responses that were already covered 

under subpart GG as primers, topcoats, or chemical milling maskants.

• Removed coatings that were not actually used (i.e., volume or coating usage was reported 

as zero).

• Removed facilities that were no longer in operation and facilities that were not actually 

subject to subpart GG.

The ICR data represented about 6,300 individual specialty coating applications (the 

combination of a specific coating at an individual facility) at 109 facilities. In about 5,200 cases, 

the specialty coating category was identified by the respondent; in the remaining cases the 

category was not identified and could not be determined from other reported information. The 

majority of spray-applied specialty coatings were applied in spray booths.

The database of responses to the 2011 ICR was also reviewed to determine the 

technologies and practices reported by industry. Add-on control devices for control of organic 

HAP emissions were reported, including thermal oxidizers and carbon adsorbers; however, these 

controls are not widely used in the source category for specialty coating operations. Add-on 

controls were reported at only three facilities and for only eight types of specialty coatings. 

These controlled specialty coatings represented 23 reported applications of specialty coatings, 

out of about 5,300 reported specialty coating applications (about 0.5 percent) and represented 

only about 0.6 percent of the specialty coating gallons reported in the 2011 ICR.

2.2 State and Regional Regulations

In addition to the ICR data, we examined a variety of state and local regulations for 

aerospace surface coating operations, including the Maricopa County Air Quality Department in 

Arizona, the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Delaware 

Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Maryland Department of the 

Environment, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and in California the 

regulations for the San Diego, Bay Area, South Coast, and Eastern Kern Air Quality 

Management Districts (see Appendix 1). These regulations generally include specialty coating 

VOC emission limits in grams per liter of coating (less water and exempt compounds) for the 

specialty coating types based on the Aerospace CTG, which are summarized in Appendix 1.

3
2.3 RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse Database

Under the EPA's New Source Review (NSR) program, if a company is planning to build 

a new plant or modify an existing plant such that criteria air pollution emissions will increase by 

a certain amount, then the company must obtain an NSR permit. The NSR permit is a 

construction permit which generally requires the company to minimize air pollution emissions by 

changing the process to prevent air pollution and/or installing air pollution control equipment. 

The terms “RACT,” “BACT,” and “LAER” are acronyms for different program 

requirements relevant to the NSR program. RACT, or Reasonably Available Control 

Technology, is required on existing sources in areas that are not meeting national ambient air 

quality standards (non-attainment areas). BACT, or Best Available Control Technology, is 

required on new or modified major sources in clean areas (attainment areas). LAER, or Lowest 

Achievable Emission Rate, is required on new or modified major sources in non-attainment 

areas. 

BACT and LAER (and sometimes RACT) are determined on a case-by-case basis, 

usually by State or local permitting agencies. The EPA established the RACT/BACT/LAER 

Clearinghouse, or RBLC, to provide a central data base of air pollution technology information 

(including past BACT and LAER decisions contained in NSR permits) to promote the sharing of 

information among permitting agencies and to aid in future case-by-case determinations. 

However, data in the RBLC are not limited to sources subject to RACT, BACT, and LAER 

requirements. Noteworthy prevention and control technology decisions and information may be 

included even if they are not related to past RACT, BACT, or LAER decisions. 

The RBLC contains over 5,000 air pollution control permit determinations that can help 

identify appropriate technologies to mitigate most air pollutant emission streams. It was designed 

to help permit applicants and reviewers make pollution prevention and control technology 

decisions for stationary air pollution sources, and includes data submitted by several U.S. 

territories and all 50 States on over 200 different air pollutants and 1,000 industrial processes.

The RBLC provides several options for searching the permit database on-line to locate 

applicable control technologies. On October 7, 2014 we conducted a search of RBLC entries for 

permits since 1980. 

We searched under the process code for Aerospace Surface Coating (41.001) which 

resulted in information on 32 facilities and 55 surface coating processes. The results are 

presented in Appendix 2. Most of the processes relating to specialty coatings did not require a 

BACT review. Two facilities were identified using add-on controls for surface coating of 

aircraft, but it is not clear whether these facilities were including specialty coating application in 

the controlled coating operations. One entry for the Boeing (Everett, WA) facility indicated highvolume, low-pressure (HVLP), electrostatic airless and modified high-efficiency air-assisted 

airless spray equipment for corrosion inhibitor and sealing activities. A search using the keyword 

“Aerospace” resulted in 4 matching facilities, but these were already included in the results using 

the process code for Aerospace Surface Coating. 

A search of the California’s Statewide BACT Clearinghouse yielded only a single result, 

which was also identified in the RBLC search described above.

4
Finally, a search of Washington State’s records of permits for aerospace facilities 

identified a final Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit dated September 10, 

2014, for the Boeing facility in Everett, WA.

2

 In this, the PSD permit considers BACT for VOC 

coating operations as complying with all applicable VOC emission standards of the Aerospace 

NESHAP. The accompanying technical support document identified add-on control 

technologies, including a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO), but concluded these were not 

considered BACT after taking into account energy, environmental, and economic impacts.3 This 

BACT analysis addressed all surface coating, and did not specifically address specialty coating 

operations.

3.0 MACT FLOOR ANALYSIS FOR SPECIALTY COATING OPERATIONS

3.1 Using the 2011 ICR Data

The EPA considered a MACT analysis for specialty coatings based on the 2008 data that 

were submitted in response to the 2011 ICR. The EPA calculated the total organic HAP 

emissions from each specialty coating formulation taking into account the capture efficiency of 

the spray booth, if present, and the destruction or removal efficiency for any add-on controls, if 

present. Refer to the memorandum “Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities RTR 

Modeling File Preparation,” November 2014, for more a more detailed description of the 

emission calculation procedures. The ICR data also included the mass of coatings solids from 

each specialty coating and the volume of each coating used.

The EPA attempted to perform MACT floor rankings for each specialty coating category, 

applying the criteria for MACT in section 112(d)(3), and summarized in section 1.0 of this 

memo. From the organic HAP emissions and the mass solids and coating volume, the EPA was 

able to calculate the emission rate for each specialty coating in pounds (lbs) organic HAP per lb 

coating solids, and also in lb organic HAP per gallon coating.

Unfortunately, the EPA determined that the specialty coating data submitted in the 2011 

ICR were not of sufficient quality to perform a MACT analysis in this manner. The EPA 

determined that in many cases, the same coatings were classified by the reporting facilities into 

multiple different specialty coating categories, or the coating was simply identified as 

“specialty.” This indicated that the facilities did not carefully consider the specialty coating 

category definitions in Appendix A to subpart GG in selecting the specialty coating category to 

include in their ICR responses. The result is that the MACT floor for different categories could 

potentially be based on data from the same coating formulations, and those formulations would 

not be representative of the coatings that actually belong in those categories. About 5,000 

specialty coatings formulations were reported in the ICR. The EPA did not have enough 

information from the ICR to resolve those cases where the same coating formulation was 

reported in multiple categories or reported as only “specialty.”

2 Department Of Ecology, State Of Washington: Prevention Of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit. 

Issued To: The Boeing Company, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Everett Facility. Facility Location: 3003 West 

Casino Road, Everett, Washington 98203, Permit Number: PSD-14-01, Date of Original Permit Issuance: September 

10, 2014. Effective Date of Permit: September 10, 2014

3 Department Of Ecology, State Of Washington: Technical Support Document For The Boeing Company, Boeing 

Everett 777X Project. Prepared by Air Quality Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, 

Washington, September 9, 2014

5

 
However, the ICR data did allow EPA to investigate the feasibility of developing 

emission limits for specialty coatings using VOC content limits from the Aerospace CTG as 

surrogates for HAP content limits, similar to the approach used to regulate emissions from

primers and topcoats. For each specialty coating category, the EPA calculated the industry-wide 

weighted-average HAP and volatile contents for the specialty coatings reported in the 2011 ICR. 

The weighted-average volatile and HAP contents were calculated for each category as the sum of 

the volatiles or the HAP for a category, divided by the sum of the liters reported for that 

category. The use of the industry-wide weighted-average for each specialty category minimized 

the effect of coatings that may have been mis-categorized by the reporting facilities. The EPA 

was not able to calculate the weighted-average VOC content of each specialty coating category 

because VOC content was not reported in the ICR. Therefore, the EPA had to use the volatile 

content as a surrogate for the VOC content; in addition, the volatile content could not be 

corrected for water content or exempt compounds.

The EPA then plotted the average volatile contents and average HAP contents against the 

VOC content limits that are in the Aerospace CTG, and also plotted the HAP contents against the 

volatile contents. In all three cases, there is a positive correlation: between the average volatile 

contents of the coating categories and the CTG VOC limits, between the average HAP contents 

per category and the CTG VOC limits, and between the average HAP contents and the average 

volatile contents per category. These positive correlations were present even though many of the 

specialty coatings are used at facilities that are not currently subject to VOC content limits for 

specialty coatings, and even though we have observed some errors in how coatings were 

categorized.

The EPA believes that the results of these comparisons of the weighted average HAP 

content and volatile content to the CTG VOC content limits for each specialty category reaffirms 

the relationship between HAP and VOC content for specialty coatings, and indicates that VOC 

content limits would be an appropriate basis for determining MACT for HAP content. 

3.2 Identified Control Measures for Specialty Coating Operations from RBLC 

and State Rules

VOC emissions from specialty coating operations at aerospace manufacturing and rework 

facilities are addressed in the final Aerospace CTG document, which established presumptive 

RACT limits for VOC’s. The presumptive RACT limits for specialty coatings were based on the 

VOC limits contained in state VOC rules in California.

We compared the state rule VOC limits for the aerospace industry to the VOC limits in 

the Aerospace CTG and identified several differences in the VOC content limits for certain 

specialty coating categories. These differences generally affect about one-quarter of the specialty 

coating categories (although each state or regional regulation may differ from the CTG in only a 

handful of categories), and the limits differ by less than 200 grams VOC per liter of coating. 

However, because of other differences between these state and regional rules and the Aerospace 

CTG, EPA has concluded that these differences in the VOC limits do not constitute more 

stringent emission limitations compared to the VOC limits in the Aerospace CTG. 

First, in many cases where a state rule has a lower VOC limit than the CTG, the state rule 

has also added coating categories with VOC limits equal to or higher than the CTG limits. For 

6
example, one state rule has a lower limit for fuel tank coatings, but has an additional category for 

“rapid cure” fuel tank coatings that is the same as the CTG VOC limit. In other cases, the state 

rule has different applicability from the Aerospace NESHAP or the CTG. For example, the South 

Coast Air Quality Management District, California, Rule 1124 does not apply the surface coating 

VOC limits to the recoating of assembled aircraft at rework facilities if the original coating 

formulation is used, The SCAQMD rule also includes exemptions for certain applications and 

low volumes of coatings that are not found in either the CTG or the Aerospace NESHAP. These 

differences in the categories and applicability minimize the effect of differences in the VOC 

content limits.

Second, not all categories of specialty coatings are used at all Aerospace Manufacturing 

and Rework Facilities. For the specialty categories with more stringent VOC limits, the EPA 

does not have data to confirm that facilities exist in those jurisdictions that are using those 

coatings and actually have to comply with the more stringent VOC limits. For example, regional 

rules established in Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District, California and Maricopa County 

Air Quality, Arizona contain lower limits than the limits for several categories in the Aerospace 

CTG. However, the 2011 ICR data submitted by facilities in these two districts did not include 

formulations in these specialty categories; therefore, the EPA could not determine whether these 

more stringent limits in these two district rules were actually being achieved. The EPA would 

need to show that facilities are actually using coatings subject to these more stringent limits to 

confirm that these more stringent limits constitute the MACT floor according to section 

112(d)(3) of the CAA. 

Finally, many of the areas with more stringent VOC limits than in the CTG have climates 

that are warmer and drier than in most other parts of the United States, and this type of climate is 

more conducive to the use of low-VOC coatings because it helps promote expeditious curing of 

the coatings under ambient conditions. In cooler and more humid areas, the coatings require the 

use of a solvent carrier and/or thermal curing. The Aerospace NESHAP and CTG, on the other 

hand, must establish HAP and VOC limits that are applicable across the United States. It is not 

practical to establish MACT limits for coatings based on regional climate differences for this 

source category.

The EPA did not have sufficient data to calculate the VOC emissions from the specialty 

coatings to determine whether the facilities were emitting at the levels of the VOC limits, or at a 

level below the VOC limits. Therefore, the EPA assumed facilities were emitting at the VOC 

limits of the specialty coating categories for these comparisons.

The review of state and local rules also identified several rules that require specialty 

coatings to be applied with the same high-efficiency application methods that are required for 

primers and topcoats in subpart GG and that are also prescribed for primers and topcoats in the 

Aerospace CTG. This requirement is more stringent than the model rule found in the Aerospace 

CTG, which exempts specialty coatings from the requirement to use the high efficiency 

application methods that are specified for primers and topcoats. The use of high efficiency 

application methods for spray applied specialty coatings can achieve emission reductions 

through reduced coating consumption resulting from more efficient transfer of coating to the part 

with less coating overspray.

7
3.3 MACT Floor and MACT for Organic HAP Emissions

In place of using the ICR data to determine MACT for specialty coating operations, we 

based the MACT analysis on state VOC rules for specialty coating operations (using VOC as a 

surrogate for HAP), and also considered the information collected from a review of the RBLC 

and state permitting databases. Based on the state VOC rules and the other information sources 

considered, the MACT floor for aerospace manufacturing and rework specialty coating 

application operations is organic HAP content limits that are equivalent to the VOC content 

limits for specialty coatings included in the Aerospace CTG, which have been adopted by states 

to reduce emissions from specialty coating operations in ozone non-attainment areas. 

This MACT determination is based on the fact that these VOC limits are currently being 

achieved by at least 12 percent of the operating facilities in a total population of 109 operating 

aerospace and rework facilities that reported using specialty coatings in the 2011 ICR. The 

facilities complying with the CTG limits for specialty coatings are located in ozone nonattainment areas where state VOC rules have been developed based on the Aerospace CTG, and 

the EPA does not have any information to indicate that facilities are achieving emission 

limitations lower than the required VOC limits. Therefore, these VOC limits represent the 

MACT floor for specialty coatings. The EPA has not identified any achievable emission 

limitations more stringent than the MACT floor, or technologies that could be transferred and 

applied to specialty coatings operations. Therefore, the MACT for organic HAP emissions from 

specialty coatings is equal to the MACT floor limits based on the Aerospace CTG for both new 

and existing operations.

In addition, we have identified the use of high-efficiency application equipment for spray 

applied coatings as the MACT floor for specialty coating application operations. This 

determination is based on the fact that at least 11 facilities in California’s air pollution control 

districts are currently subject to district rules that require high-efficiency application equipment 

for all coating operations, including specialty coatings. These 11 facilities represent 10 percent of 

the 109 facilities that reported using specialty coatings in the 2011 ICR, and the majority of the 

top 12 percent of facilities with specialty coating operations. (In this case of coating application 

methods, the method required at the majority of facilities is taken as a measure of the central 

tendency in place of a numerical average.) Therefore, these 11 facilities constitute the MACT 

floor for specialty coatings application methods. We have not identified any control options more 

stringent than the use of high-efficiency application methods for spray-applied coating 

operations, so the MACT floor is also MACT for specialty coating application methods for both 

new and existing operations.

Based on the information from the 2011 ICR, the RBLC, and review of the state and local 

rules, we have not established that add-on control techniques are feasible as MACT for specialty 

coating application operations for the aerospace industry. In the responses to the 2011 ICR, some 

facilities indicated that they employ the use of add-on control devices to reduce organic HAP 

emissions (i.e., thermal oxidizers and carbon adsorbers) from surface coating operations, and 

may be using these controls for eight specialty coatings categories. However, these add-on 

controls are not widely used in the source category and are used in only about 0.5 percent of 

specialty coating applications and for about 0.6 percent of coating gallons used. At the facilities 

with add-on controls, the controls are not used for all the reported specialty coatings at those 

8
facilities, and are not used for all of the specialty coatings within a category at a single facility.

The EPA does not have enough data to reliably determine the emission limitation achieved by 

these facilities with the add-on controls for the specific specialty coating categories. Also, as 

mentioned in section 2.1, the PSD review for the Boeing (Everett, WA) facility did not consider 

add-on control technologies, including RTO, as feasible for aerospace surface coating operations 

after taking into account energy, environmental, and economic impacts.

Where these add-on controls are used for specialty coating operations, they are often used 

primarily to control other emission sources with higher emission concentrations in the exhaust, 

and may be used only for specialty coating operations as a secondary benefit. The EPA did not 

have facilities reporting the use of add-on controls only for specialty coating operations without 

other sources being controlled by the add-on controls.

In the development of NESHAP for certain other surface coating source categories, the 

EPA had identified applications in which add-on control technology was feasible for the 

reduction of HAP emissions. However, these situations are typically automated surface coating 

operations where the coating process can be totally enclosed and human coating applicators 

(such as spray gun operators in a spray booth) are not needed.4 The ability to use a total 

enclosure allows for an emission stream with a relatively small volume and high HAP and VOC 

concentrations to be captured and sent to the add-on control device. These conditions allow for 

more cost-effective treatment of the stream because of the lower volume of the stream and the 

increased fuel value of the combustible HAP and VOC in the stream. The use of automated 

coating operations is not feasible for specialty surface coating in the aerospace industry because 

the size and variety of the parts being coated requires the use of human coating operators, and 

this means that HAP and VOC concentrations must be minimized to comply with worker safety 

standards.

For these reasons, the EPA did not consider add-on controls to be feasible as MACT for 

specialty coating operations in the aerospace manufacturing and rework source category.

3.4 MACT Floor and MACT for Inorganic HAP Emissions

The MACT floor level for control of inorganic HAP emissions from spray-applied 

specialty coatings is determined to be equivalent to the current requirements for control of 

inorganic HAP emissions from the spray application of primers and topcoats in the Aerospace 

NESHAP, as provided in 40 CFR 63.745(g).

The predominant method used to control inorganic HAP emissions from all spray-applied 

coating operations (including specialty coatings) is the use of a spray booth with a particulate 

filter to capture overspray particles that contain inorganic HAP as pigments. The Aerospace 

NESHAP currently requires the use of spray booths with filters meeting minimum efficiency 

requirements for the spray application of primers and topcoats that contain inorganic HAP. (40 

CFR 63.745(g)) Based on the results of the 2011 ICR, the EPA has determined that the vast 

majority of spray-applied specialty coatings are currently applied in spray booths. It is likely that 

these specialty coatings are applied in the same spray booths as primers and topcoats, or at least 

4 See, for example, 40 CFR 63, subpart KKKK, NESHAP for Metal Can Surface Coating, and subpart SSSS, 

NESHAP for Metal Coil Surface Coating.

9

 
in spray booths that are very similar to those used for primer and topcoat operations. Therefore, 

the same inorganic HAP emission limitations that are applied to primer and topcoat operations 

are also applicable to specialty coating operations, and these constitute the MACT floor for the 

control of inorganic HAP from specialty coatings. We have not identified any control options 

more stringent than the use of spray booths with high-efficiency filters to control inorganic HAP 

emissions from spray-applied specialty coating operations, so the MACT floor is also MACT for 

both new and existing operations.

10
Appendix 1

Summary of State and Regional Aerospace Manufacturing and 

Rework Surface Coating Rule VOC Limits
FacNum FacName FacCity FacCounty FacState Nonattainment Areas

348 Eielson Air Force Base Eielson AFBFairbanks N AK Source:

529 United States Army Garrison Fort Wainwright, Alaska Fairbanks N Fairbanks N AK http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/greenbk/ancl.html

223 Anniston Army Depot, Anniston Alabama Anniston Calhoun CoAL

272 Pemco World Air Services-Dothan, AL Dothan Dale CountAL

482 U.S. Army Aviation Center of Excellence and Fort Rucker Fort Rucke Dale CountAL

5017 GKN WESTLAND AEROSPACE, INC. TALLASSEE ELMORE CoAL

198 Pratt & Whitney Automation Madison Limestone AL

409 Triumph Fabrications Hot Springs Hot SpringsGarland CoAR

331 Pratt & Whitney PSD Inc. Springdale Washingto AR

602 US Airways Maintenance and Technical Operations Center Phoenix Maricopa CAZ

545 Edwards Air Force Base Edwards A Kern CountCA Kern

2024 Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake Kern CountCA Kern

429 The Boeing Company - C-17 Facility Long BeachLos Angele CA South Coast

393 Triumph Aerostructures - Vought Commercial Division HawthorneLos Angele CA South Coast

520 Rohr, Inc. Riverside Riverside CCA South Coast

542 Leading Edge Aviation Services Victorville San Bernar CA South Coast

306 Naval Air Station North Island San Diego San Diego CCA San Diego

2015 United Airlines Technical Operations Maintenance Center San FrancisSan Mateo CA San Francisco

693 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation - Stratford Facility Stratford Fairfield CoCT

2025 EDAC Technologies FarmingtonHartford CoCT

626 Kaman Aerospace Corporation - Helicopters Division Bloomfield Hartford CoCT

382 Pratt & Whitney, Division of UTC East HartfoHartford CoCT

5021 Kaman Aerospace Corporation, Precision Products Division MiddletowMiddlesex CT

342 Pratt & Whitney, Division of UTC MiddletowMiddlesex CT

349 DASSAULT FALCON JET - WILMINGTON CORP New CastleNew Castle DE

313 Tyndall AFB Panama CitBay CountyFL

358 Patrick Air Force Base Patrick Air Brevard CoFL

284 TIMCO Aviation Services, Inc. - Lake City Base Maintenance Operations Lake City Columbia CFL

270 LOCKHEED MARTIN MISSILES AND FIRE CONTROL OCALA MARION CoFL

325 Triumph Aerostructures - Vought Aircraft Division Stuart Martin CouFL

224 Triumph Aerostructures - Vought Integrated Programs Division MilledgevilBaldwin CoGA

506 U.S. Air Force Plant 6 Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Marietta Cobb CounGA

388 Delta Air Lines, Inc. Technical Operations Center Atlanta Fulton Cou GA

431 Robins Air Force Base Robins Air Houston CoGA

2017 Meggitt (Rockmart), Inc. (formerly Engineered Fabrics Corp) Rockmart Polk Count GA

5033 Eaton Aeroquip, LLC - Toccoa, GA Facility EastanolleeStephens CGA

356 Carleton Life Support Systems Inc. Davenport Scott Coun IA

505 Wellman Dynamics Corporation Creston Union CounIA

487 Rolls-Royce Corporation Indianapol Marion CouIN Aerospace regs only apply to Lake and Porter County

347 Meggitt (Troy), Inc. Troy Perry CounIN

2011 Honeywell International Inc; South Bend South BendSt. Joseph IN

486 GE Engine Services, LLC Arkansas C Cowley CouKS

65 Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Wichita Sedgwick CKS

2027 Spirit Aerosystems, Inc. Wichita Sedgwick CKS

477 General Electric Aviation Lynn Essex CounMA

450 Raytheon Integrated Air Defense Center Andover Essex CounMA

458 Middle River Aircraft Systems Baltimore Baltimore CMD
282 Alliant Techsystems Inc. Elkton Cecil CountMD

644 Pratt & Whitney AutoAir, Inc. Lansing Ingham Co MI

5034 Eaton Aerospace LLC - Jackson, MI Facility Jackson Jackson Co MI

389 Delta Air Lines, Inc. MSP TechOps Minneapol Hennepin CMN

329 The Boeing Company-St. Charles St. Charles St. Charles MO

513 GKN Aerospace - St. Louis HazelwoodSt. Louis CoMO

332 The Boeing Company - St. Louis St. Louis St. Louis CoMO

367 L-3 Vertex Aerospace Madison Madison CoMS

483 Marine Corps Air Station - Cherry Point Cherry PoinCraven CouNC

340 Headquarters XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg Fort Bragg Cumberlan NC

600 US Airways, Inc. - CLT (Charlotte, NC) Charlotte Mecklenbu NC

652 PGM of New England LLC ManchesteHillsboroug NH

630 Ametek Rotron, Inc. WoodstockUlster CounNY

343 CTL Aerospace, Inc. Cincinnati Butler Cou OH

672 Honeywell Aerospace Urbana Champaign OH

430 Wright-Patterson AFB Dayton Montgome OH

5027 SAINT-GOBAIN PERFORMANCE PLASTICS CORPORATION RAVENNA Portage CoOH

2026 Tinker Air Force Base, OK Tinker AFB Oklahoma OK

2021 American Airlines Maintenance and Engineering Center Tulsa Tulsa CounOK

2003 Bizjet International Tulsa Tulsa CounOK

2013 Nordam I&S and NTRSD Divisions Tulsa Tulsa CounOK

460 NORDAM Repair Division Tulsa Tulsa CounOK

2014 Quality Plating Co. of Tulsa Tulsa Tulsa CounOK

523 Southwest United Industries, Inc. Tulsa Tulsa CounOK

494 Spirit AeroSystems Tulsa Tulsa CounOK

603 US Airways Pittsburgh International Airport Coraopolis Allegheny CPA

473 The Boeing Company, Defense, Space & Security, Rotorcraft Programs, Philadelphia Ridley TowDelaware CPA

233 Letterkenny Army Depot ChambersbFranklin CoPA

5001 MCAS Beaufort Beaufort Beaufort C SC

417 Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Greenville Greenville SC

58 Triumph Aerostructures, LLC Nashville Davidson CTN

213 Department of the Army, U.S. Army Garrison-Fort Hood Fort Hood Bell CountyTX

5025 Randolph Air Force Base Randolph ABexar CounTX

5032 American Airlines - AFW Fort WorthDenton Co TX

5019 NASA Ellington Field Houston Harris CounTX

5020 NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston Harris CounTX

376 L-3 Communications Intergrated Systems MID Greenville Hunt Coun TX

3000 US Army Corpus Christi Army Depot Corpus ChrNueces Co TX

508 Goodrich Interiors Fort Worth Fort WorthTarrant Co TX

416 Lockheed Martin Corporation d.b.a. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Fort WorthTarrant Co TX

696 ATK Launch Systems, Promontory Promontor Box Elder CUT

5010 Alliant Techsystems Aerospace Structures Clearfield Davis CounUT

5012 ATK Launch Systems, Promontory Clearfield Davis CounUT

663 Hill Air Force Base Hill Air Forc Davis CounUT

NH DES did not adopt a RACT regulation for the following source 

categories and hereby declares that no such major sources or sources 

for which RACT is applicable are present in New Hampshire. 
5013 ATK Launch Systems, Bacchus West Valle Salt Lake C UT

293 Naval Station Norfolk, Norfolk Virginina Norfolk Norfolk Cit VA

292 Naval Air Station Oceana, Virginia Beach, VA Virginia Be Virginia Be VA

5023 LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS LANGLEY AYork CountVA

438 Naval Air Station Whidbey Island (Ault Field) Oak Harbo Island CounWA

383 Naval Air Station Whidbey Island (Ault Field) Renton King Count WA

384 Boeing Commercial Airplane Group-North Boeing Field Seattle King Count WA

406 Hexcel Corporation Kent King Count WA

447 Boeing Commercial Airplanes Fabrication Division Puyallup Pierce Cou WA

2002 Allegany Ballistics Laboratory Rocket CenMineral CoWV

418 BE Aerospace / SMR Technologies Fenwick Nicholas CoWV
State or Region MARICOPA COUNTY, AZ Connecticut Delaware Maryland St. Louis, St. Charles, MO Pennsylvania Texas San Diego County Air 

Pollution Control 

District 

Bay Area Air Quality 

Management District 

South Coast Air Quality Management 

District

Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District

Appendix A Specialty Coating Types CTG VOC 

Limit 

(g/liter)

g/liter g/liter g/liter g/liter g/liter g/liter g/liter g/liter g/liter g/liter g/liter

Ablative coating 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600

Adhesion Promoter 890 890 890 890 890 890 890 890 250 850

Adhesive - Nonstructural 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 250 250

Adhesive - Structural Autoclavable 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 50 50 50

Adhesive - Structural Nonautoclavable 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 250 850 850

Adhesive bonding primer, cured above 

250°F

1030 1030 1030 1030 1030 1030 1,030 1030 350 850 Long Term 250

Short Term 250 

2. Adhesive Bonding Primers 

a. Commercial Aircraft 250 

b. Military Aircraft 805 

Adhesive bonding primer, cured at 

250°F or below

850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 350 850 Long Term 250

Short Term 250 

2. Adhesive Bonding Primers 

a. Commercial Aircraft 250 

b. Military Aircraft 805 

Antichafe Coating 660 660 660 660 660 660 660 660 600 420 600

Caulking and smoothing compound 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850

Chemical Agent Resistant Coating 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550

Clear Coating 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 520 520

Commercial exterior aerodynamic 

structure primer

650 350 650 650 650 650 650 650 650

Commercial Interior Adhesive 760 760 760 760 760 760 760 760 760

Compatible Substrate Primer 780 350 780 780 780 780 780 780 780

CONDUCTIVE FLUOROPOLYMER 

COATING

0

Corrosion prevention system 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 No comparable category in SCAQMD

General primers - 350

Low-Solids Corrosion Resistant Primer350

350

Critical use and line sealer maskant 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1,020 1020 Touch-up, Line Sealer Maskants-750 750

Cryogenic Flexible Primer 645 350 645 645 645 645 645 645 645

Cyanoacrylate Adhesive 1020 1,020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1,020 1020 1020

Dry lubricative material 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 Fasteners Lubrication 

250

Non-Fasteners 

Lubrication 880

Fastener Installation -675

Fastener-Lubricative Coatings, Fastener 

Manufacturing -120

Non-Fastener Lubricative Coatings, 

Fastener Manufacturing - 675

Fastener Installation -675

Fastener-Lubricative Coatings, Fastener 

Manufacturing -120

Non-Fastener Lubricative Coatings, Fastener 

Manufacturing - 675

Electric or Radiation-Effect Coating 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800

Electrostatic discharge or 

electromagnetic interference coat

800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800

Elevated temperature Skydol-resistent 

commercial primer

740 350 740 740 740 740 740 740 740

Epoxy Polyamide Topcoat 660 420 660 660 660 660 660 660 660

Fire-Resistant Interior Coating 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 600 Commercial 650 

 Military 800

10. Fire-Resistant (Interior) Coating 

a. Civilian 650 

b. Military 800 

c. Space 800 

Flexible Primer 640 350 640 640 640 640 640 640 Impact Resistant Coating 420 640

Flight Test: All Other 840 840 840 840 840 840 840 840 840 840 840

Fuel Tank Adhesive 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620

Fuel Tank Coating 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 720 420 12. Fuel-Tank Coating 

a. General 420 

b. Rapid Cure 720 

High Temperature Coating 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 720 850 850

Insulation Covering 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 740

Intermediate release coating 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750

Lacquer 830 830 830 830 830 830 830 830 830

Metalized epoxy coating 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 740 700 740

Mold Release 780 780 780 780 780 780 780 780 780 780

Optical anti-reflective coating 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 700 700

Part Marking Coating 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850

Pretreatment Coating 780 780 780 780 780 780 780 780 780 780

Rain Erosion-Resistant Coating 850 420 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 800

Rocket motor bonding adhesive 890 890 890 890 890 890 890 890 890

Rubber-Based Adhesive 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850

Scale inhibitor 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880

Screen Print Ink 840 840 840 840 840 840 840 840 840

Seal coat maskant 1230 420 1230 1230 1230 1230 1,230 1230 1230

Sealant 600 600 600

Sealant - Extrudable / Rollable / 

Brushable

280 240 280 280 280 280 240 280 280 280

Sealant: Sprayable 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600

Silicone insulation material 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 For Elastomers and 

Elastomeric 850
State or Region MARICOPA COUNTY, AZ Connecticut Delaware Maryland St. Louis, St. Charles, MO Pennsylvania Texas San Diego County Air 

Pollution Control 

District 

Bay Area Air Quality 

Management District 

South Coast Air Quality Management 

District

Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District

Solid Film Lubricant 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 880 Fastener Installation -880

Fastener-Lubricative Coatings, Fastener 

Manufacturing -250

Non-Fastener Lubricative Coatings, 

Fastener Manufacturing - 880

Fastener Installation -880

Fastener-Lubricative Coatings, Fastener 

Manufacturing -250

Non-Fastener Lubricative Coatings, Fastener 

Manufacturing - 880

Specialized Function Coating 890 890 890 890 890 890 890 890 890

Temporary protective coating 320 250 320 320 320 320 320 320 250 250 250

Thermal Control Coating 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800

Wet fastener installation coating 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 (See "Fastener Installation" in solid film 

lubricants)

675

Wing coating 850 420 850 850 850 850 850 750 750
Appendix 2

Results of Search of the EPA’s RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse 

Database for Process Code for Aerospace Surface Coating (41.001) 

on October 7, 2014.
Searched under Process Code: 41.001 since 1980

RBLCID FACILITY_NAME

CORPORATE_OR_COMPA

NY_NAME FACILITY_COUNTY

FACILITY

_STATE

EPA_R

EGION AGENCY_NAME

PERMIT_N

UM SIC_CODE NAICS_CODE

FACILITY_REGISTRY

_SYSTEM_NUMBER

PERMIT_

TYPE PERMIT_URL FACILITY_DESCRIPTION PERMIT_NOTES PROCESS_NAME

PROCCESS_T

YPE

THROUGHPU

T THROUGHPUT_UNIT PROCESS_NOTES

CAS_NUMBE

R

CONTROL_M

ETHOD_COD

E CONTROL_METHOD_DESCRIPTION

EMISSION_LI

MIT_1

EMISSION_LI

MIT_1_UNIT

EMISSION_LI

MIT_1_AVG_

TIME_CONDI

TION CASE-BY-CASE_BASIS

OTHER_ 

APPLICABLE_

REQUIREME

NTS

OTHER_FACT

ORS

PERCENT_EF

FICIENCY EMISSION_LIMIT_2

EMISSION_LI

MIT_2_UNIT

EMISSION_LI

MIT_2_AVGE

RAGE_TIME_

CONDITION POLLUTANT_COMPLIANCE_NOTES

CA-0542 CASPIAN CASPIAN CA 9

SAN DIEGO COUNTY APCD, 

CA 1669 3728 110017400702 U

1. DETERMINATION FOR CUSTOM-MADE STAINLESS STEEL DIP TANK FOR COATING AEROSPACE 

PARTS; LIMITED TO 430 GPD COATING USE. 2. FOR EMISSION LIMIT, STATED NO LIMIT. 3. ARB 

BACT DETERMINATION NO.: A340-562-92. DIP TANK 41.001 0 VOC P

WATER BASED MASKANT W/ MAX. VOC 

CONTENT = 150 G/L 0 SEE NOTES Other Case-by-Case 0 0

WA-0045 HEATH TECNA AEROSPACE CO.

HEATH TECNA 

AEROSPACE CO. WA 10

PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR 

AGENCY, WA 4342 110002149862 A

ONE BLEEKER BROS ADHESIVE SPRAY BOOTH, USING METHYLENE 

CHLORIDE SOLVENT AT 9,815 CFM IN PLANT 6A, ZONE 2. 

REFERENCE NC3594 AND NC3769. SPRAY BOOTH, ADHESIVE 41.001 9815 CFM VOC A CARBON ADSORBER (METHYLENE CHL.) 2.4 T/YR Other Case-by-Case 0 0

TX-0205 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.

BELL HELICOPTER 

TEXTRON INC. TARRANT TX 6

TEXAS COMMISSION ON 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

(TCEQ) 18514 110017399947 U

A ROTATING CYLINDRICAL CARBON ADSORBER IS USED TO ADSORB & DESORB VOC. THE DESORBED 

VOC IS INCINERATED IN A CATALYTIC INCINERATOR. OVERALL VOC CONTROL EFF. IS 90.25%, BASED 

ON OVERALL MATERIAL BALANCE. SPRAY BOOTH, PAINT 41.001 0 VOC A CARBON ADSORBER & INCINERATOR 8.61 T/YR BACT-PSD 0 8.18 T/YR

TX-0205 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.

BELL HELICOPTER 

TEXTRON INC. TARRANT TX 6

TEXAS COMMISSION ON 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

(TCEQ) 18514 110017399947 U

A ROTATING CYLINDRICAL CARBON ADSORBER IS USED TO ADSORB & DESORB VOC. THE DESORBED 

VOC IS INCINERATED IN A CATALYTIC INCINERATOR. OVERALL VOC CONTROL EFF. IS 90.25%, BASED 

ON OVERALL MATERIAL BALANCE. SPRAY BOOTH, PAINT 41.001 0 9/5/7446 N 0.01 T/YR BACT-PSD 0 0

TX-0205 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.

BELL HELICOPTER 

TEXTRON INC. TARRANT TX 6

TEXAS COMMISSION ON 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

(TCEQ) 18514 110017399947 U

A ROTATING CYLINDRICAL CARBON ADSORBER IS USED TO ADSORB & DESORB VOC. THE DESORBED 

VOC IS INCINERATED IN A CATALYTIC INCINERATOR. OVERALL VOC CONTROL EFF. IS 90.25%, BASED 

ON OVERALL MATERIAL BALANCE. SPRAY BOOTH, PAINT 41.001 0 PM N 0.34 T/YR BACT-PSD 0 0

TX-0205 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.

BELL HELICOPTER 

TEXTRON INC. TARRANT TX 6

TEXAS COMMISSION ON 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

(TCEQ) 18514 110017399947 U

A ROTATING CYLINDRICAL CARBON ADSORBER IS USED TO ADSORB & DESORB VOC. THE DESORBED 

VOC IS INCINERATED IN A CATALYTIC INCINERATOR. OVERALL VOC CONTROL EFF. IS 90.25%, BASED 

ON OVERALL MATERIAL BALANCE. SPRAY BOOTH, PAINT 41.001 0 630-08-0 N 0.19 T/YR BACT-PSD 0 0

TX-0205 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.

BELL HELICOPTER 

TEXTRON INC. TARRANT TX 6

 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

(TCEQ) 18514 110017399947 U

 

VOC IS INCINERATED IN A CATALYTIC INCINERATOR. OVERALL VOC CONTROL EFF. IS 90.25%, BASED 

ON OVERALL MATERIAL BALANCE. SPRAY BOOTH, PAINT 41.001 0 10102 N 0.46 T/YR BACT-PSD 0 0

CA-0549 EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE

EDWARDS AIR FORCE 

BASE KERN COUNTY CA 9

KERN COUNTY APCD 

(EASTERN PORTION), CA 127187 9999 110017718709 U HANGAR-SIZED SPRAY BOOTH FOR AIRCRAFT UP TO EC-18 41.001 0 VOC A

CARBON ADSORP. FILTER BANK W/ FID TO 

DET. BREAKTHR 0 Other Case-by-Case 0 0

CA-0356 NORTHROP NORTHROP CA 9 SOUTH COAST AQMD, CA 187564 110017436817 U

TOTAL COST FOR THE APPLICANT IS $615000. THIS COST MAY HAVE INCLUDED SOME M AJOR 

MODIFICATION TO THE SPRAY FACILITY. THE ACTUAL COST FOR THE CONTROL EQ UIPMENT COULD 

BE LESS. MATL. APPLIC., AIRCRAFT SPRAY FACILITY 41.001 0 VOC A FILTER TYPE CARBON ADSORBER 81 LB/D Other Case-by-Case 0 0

CA-0410 NORTHROP 3-2 DIVISION NORTHROP 3-2 DIVISION CA 9 SOUTH COAST AQMD, CA 224882 110017405208 U

PREVIOUSLY ISSUED UNDER APPLICATION # 187564 WITH PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT ISSUE D ON 

7/21/89. CARBON PANELS TO BE CHANGED AFTER USING 720 LB OF VOC. AIRCRAFT PAINT SPRAY FACILITY IN HANGER 41.001 2 GAL/D COATINGS & SOL VOC A

FILTER-TYPE CARBON ADSORBTION PANEL 

OVER EXHAUST AIR VENT 2 LB/D BACT-PSD 90 0

CA-0979 DOUGLAS PRODUCTS DIVISION

DOUGLAS PRODUCTS 

DIVISION

LOS ANGELES 

COUNTY CA 9 SOUTH COAST AQMD, CA 287160 3444 332322 110000898468 A

PARTS COATED: AEROSPACE SKINS, RAILS & 

FASTENERS FACILITY ID: 800038 AEROSPACE METAL PARTS COATING OPERATION 41.001

SPRAY BOOTH AND FLASH-OFF AREA. OPERATION IS 

TOTALLY ENCLOSED AND VENTED TO CONCENTRATOR. 

VOCS CAPTURED IN CONCENTRATOR ARE VENTED TO 

THERMAL OXIDIZER FOR DESTRUCTION. VOC A CONCENTRATOR AND THERMAL OXIDIZER 341 GAL/D

COATINGS 

USED BY 

FACILITY LAER 93.2 0

BACT DETERMINATION FOR THIS APPLICATION IS A 

COMBINATION OF A CONCENTRATOR AND A THERMAL 

OXIDIZER. COATINGS TOTAL EXCLUDES MILLING MASKANT.

CA-0881

HUCK INTERNATIONAL - 

DEUTSCH OPERATIONS

HUCK INTERNATIONAL - 

DEUTSCH OPERATIONS LOS ANGELES CA 9

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES 

BOARD 298582 3769 110017408688 A FACILITY IN OPERATION BEFORE PERMIT ISSUE. FOUR SPRAY BOOTHS 41.001 6000 SCFM

ARB RECORD # A340-901-99. ACTUAL CONTROL 

EFFICIENCY: 90.6%. FOUR SPRAY KING, ECONO, 

INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS, DRY-FILTER, OPEN-FACED FLOORTYPE SPRAY BOOTHS USED TO COAT AREOSPACE 

FASTENERS VENTILATED BY ONE INLET FAN WHICH ALSO 

VENTILATES THREE OVENS. HIGH VOC COATING. VOC A

BACT DETERMINATION IS TELLKAMP 

SYSTEMS REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER 

WITH A 1.6 MMBTU/H NAT GAS BURNER 

AND 3 MMBTU/H STAND-BY BURNER. 

PERMIT LIMIT IS LB VOC/DAY LIMIT 59 LB/D BACT-PSD 0 0

CA-0980

HUCK INTERNATIONAL - 

DEUTSCH OPERATIONS

HUCK INTERNATIONAL - 

DEUTSCH OPERATIONS

LOS ANGELES 

COUNTY CA 9 SOUTH COAST AQMD, CA 298582 3444 332333 110017408688 A PARTS COATED: AEROSPACE FASTENERS FACILITY ID: 102684 AEROSPACE METAL PARTS COATING OPERATION 41.001

COATING OPERATION CONSISTS OF (4) SPRAY BOOTHS 

AND 3 BAKE OVENS VENTED TO THERMAL OXIDIZER. VOC A THERMAL OXIDIZER 59 LB/D LAER 90.6 0

BACT DETERMINATION FOR THIS APPLICATION IS A 

THERMAL OXIDIZER

CA-0977

KAL-GUARD COATINGS & 

MANUFACTURING

KAL-GUARD COATINGS & 

MANUFACTURING

LOS ANGELES 

COUNTY CA 9 SOUTH COAST AQMD, CA 328007 3444 332322 110000476743 A PARTS COATED: AEROSPACE FASTNERS Facility ID: 112372 AEROSPACE METAL PART COATING OPERATION 41.001

The coating operation consists of 9 spray boothes and 5 

ovens. VOCs are captures in the concentrator and 

desorbed with hot air to the thermal oxidizer. VOC A

ZEOLITE CONCENTRATOR AND THERMAL 

OXIDIZER 216 LB/D Facility Limit LAER 97 0

BACT DETERMINATION FOR THIS APPLICATION IS A 

COMBINATION OF REGENERTIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER AND 

ZEOLITE CONCENTRATOR.

CA-1045

KAL-GARD COATING & MFG. 

E/M

KAL-GARD COATING & 

MFG. E/M LOS ANGELES CA 9 SOUTH COAST AQMD, CA 328007 3444 332322 110017408483 A

CARB ID: 635.0, OPERATING PERMIT DATE: 01-06-1999, STARTUP DATE: NEW CONSTR 

MODIFICATION: NEW CONSTRUCTION TECH STATUS: BACT DETERMINATION YES SOURCE TEST 

AVAILABLE SPRAY BOOTH 41.001 0

EQUIP: , MFR: BINKS, DEVILBISS & BLEEKER, TYPE: DRY 

FILTER, MODEL: VARIOUS, FUNC EQUIP: PATRS COATED: 

AEROSPACE FASTENERS, FUEL_TYPE: , SCHEDULE: 

VARIABLE, H/D: 16, D/W: 5.5, W/Y: 50, NOTES: SOURCE 

TEST RESULTS: DATE OF SOURCE TEST: 3/1/97. CAPTURE 

EFF.:100%, DESTRUCTION EFF.:97%, OVERALL EFF.: 97% 

INLET FLOW: 13,533 DSCFM, VOC EMISSIONS TO 

CONTROL:13.8 LB/HR, VOC EMISSIONS TO 

ATMOSPHERE:0.25LB/HR VOC A

A ZEOLITE CONCENTRATOR AND THERMAL 

OXIDIZER 216 LB/D BACT-PSD U 0 0

DATE OF SOURCE TEST: 3/1/97. CAPTURE EFF.:100%, DESTRUCTION EFF.:97%, 

OVERALL EFF.: 97% INLET FLOW: 13,533 DSCFM, VOC EMISSIONS TO CONTROL:13.8 

LB/HR, VOC EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE:0.25LB/HR

CA-1045

KAL-GARD COATING & MFG. 

E/M

KAL-GARD COATING & 

MFG. E/M LOS ANGELES CA 9 SOUTH COAST AQMD, CA 328007 3444 332322 110017408483 A

CARB ID: 635.0, OPERATING PERMIT DATE: 01-06-1999, STARTUP DATE: NEW CONSTR 

MODIFICATION: NEW CONSTRUCTION TECH STATUS: BACT DETERMINATION YES SOURCE TEST 

AVAILABLE SPRAY BOOTH 41.001 0

EQUIP: , MFR: BINKS, DEVILBISS & BLEEKER, TYPE: DRY 

FILTER, MODEL: VARIOUS, FUNC EQUIP: PATRS COATED: 

AEROSPACE FASTENERS, FUEL_TYPE: , SCHEDULE: 

VARIABLE, H/D: 16, D/W: 5.5, W/Y: 50, NOTES: SOURCE 

TEST RESULTS: DATE OF SOURCE TEST: 3/1/97. CAPTURE 

EFF.:100%, DESTRUCTION EFF.:97%, OVERALL EFF.: 97% 

INLET FLOW: 13,533 DSCFM, VOC EMISSIONS TO 

CONTROL:13.8 LB/HR, VOC EMISSIONS TO 

ATMOSPHERE:0.25LB/HR 10102 A AFTERBURNER 0.27 LB/H BACT-PSD U 0 0

CA-1045

KAL-GARD COATING & MFG. 

E/M

KAL-GARD COATING & 

MFG. E/M LOS ANGELES CA 9 SOUTH COAST AQMD, CA 328007 3444 332322 110017408483 A

CARB ID: 635.0, OPERATING PERMIT DATE: 01-06-1999, STARTUP DATE: NEW CONSTR 

MODIFICATION: NEW CONSTRUCTION TECH STATUS: BACT DETERMINATION YES SOURCE TEST 

AVAILABLE SPRAY BOOTH 41.001 0

EQUIP: , MFR: BINKS, DEVILBISS & BLEEKER, TYPE: DRY 

FILTER, MODEL: VARIOUS, FUNC EQUIP: PATRS COATED: 

AEROSPACE FASTENERS, FUEL_TYPE: , SCHEDULE: 

VARIABLE, H/D: 16, D/W: 5.5, W/Y: 50, NOTES: SOURCE 

TEST RESULTS: DATE OF SOURCE TEST: 3/1/97. CAPTURE 

EFF.:100%, DESTRUCTION EFF.:97%, OVERALL EFF.: 97% 

INLET FLOW: 13,533 DSCFM, VOC EMISSIONS TO 

CONTROL:13.8 LB/HR, VOC EMISSIONS TO 

ATMOSPHERE:0.25LB/HR 630-08-0 A AFTERBURNER 0.16 LB/H BACT-PSD U 0 0

CA-0901 TIME AVIATION SERVICES, INC.

TIME AVIATION 

SERVICES, INC. LOS ANGELES CA 9 SOUTH COAST AQMD, CA 353357 3728 110002933540 A

APPLICATION RECEIVED, START UP AND COMPLIANCE DATES NOT AVAILABLE. PLANT HAS FILED 

FOR A MODIFICATION. SPRAY BOOTHS, TWO DRY FILTER 41.001 0

ARB RECORD # A340-927-00 TWO M&W DRY-FILTER 

AUTOMOTIVE SPRAY BOOTHS USING AEROSPACE 

COATINGS SUCH AS PROTECTIVE COATINGS AND LACQUER 

THINNERS TO COAT LARGE AND SMALL AIRCRAFT PARTS VOC P

PERMIT LIMIT IS USAGE LIMIT AND USE OF 

SCAQMD REGULATION XI COMPLIANT 

MATERIALS. LISTINGS OF VOC LIMITS FOR 

INDIVIDUAL AEROSPACE COATING TYPES 

CAN BE FOUND AT: 

WWW.AQMD.GOV/RULES/HTML/R1124.HT

ML 3 GAL/D BACT-PSD 0 0

CA-0451 TRACOR FLIGHT SYSTEMS, INC.

TRACOR FLIGHT 

SYSTEMS, INC. CA 9

KERN COUNTY APCD 

(EASTERN PORTION), CA 0102001A 110017430092 U

1. DETERMINATION FOR AIRCRAFT COATING OPERATION IN AEROSPACE COMPONENT AND 

ASSEMBLY MANUFACTNG PLANT. MODIFICATION TO ALLOW FOR USE OF ADDITIONAL PAINTS. 

EQUIPMENT IS 15'X12'X36' BLEEKER BROTHERS MODEL NO. AT-PL-38 PAINT SPRAY BOOTH. 2. 

PERMIT CONDITIONS: (A) TIME OF OPERATION - 8 HPD; (B) THROUGHPUT CAP. - FAN EXHAUST < 

18,000 CFM AND 2.5 GPD OF COATING. 3. PM10 CONTROL IS A DAYTON 36 DIAGONAL FAN W/ 5 

HP MOTOR AND 34 FILTER CELLS HOLDING 68 20X20X3 PAINT ARRESTOR PADS. 4. ARB BACT 

DETERMINATION NO.'S: (PM10) A340-487-91, (VOC) A340-560-92. 5. ORIGINALLY STARTUP DATE: 

10/23/91 - CHANGES TO PLANNED MODIFICATION. COATING OPERATION, AIRCRAFT 41.001 0 PM A

DIAGONAL FAN AND FILTER CELLS W/ 

ARRESTOR PADS 1.54 LBM/D BACT-PSD 0 0

CA-0451 TRACOR FLIGHT SYSTEMS, INC.

TRACOR FLIGHT 

SYSTEMS, INC. CA 9

KERN COUNTY APCD 

(EASTERN PORTION), CA 0102001A 110017430092 U

1. DETERMINATION FOR AIRCRAFT COATING OPERATION IN AEROSPACE COMPONENT AND 

ASSEMBLY MANUFACTNG PLANT. MODIFICATION TO ALLOW FOR USE OF ADDITIONAL PAINTS. 

EQUIPMENT IS 15'X12'X36' BLEEKER BROTHERS MODEL NO. AT-PL-38 PAINT SPRAY BOOTH. 2. 

PERMIT CONDITIONS: (A) TIME OF OPERATION - 8 HPD; (B) THROUGHPUT CAP. - FAN EXHAUST < 

18,000 CFM AND 2.5 GPD OF COATING. 3. PM10 CONTROL IS A DAYTON 36 DIAGONAL FAN W/ 5 

HP MOTOR AND 34 FILTER CELLS HOLDING 68 20X20X3 PAINT ARRESTOR PADS. 4. ARB BACT 

DETERMINATION NO.'S: (PM10) A340-487-91, (VOC) A340-560-92. 5. ORIGINALLY STARTUP DATE: 

10/23/91 - CHANGES TO PLANNED MODIFICATION. COATING OPERATION, AIRCRAFT 41.001 0 VOC A

DIAGONAL FAN AND FILTER CELLS W/ 

ARRESTOR PADS 19.9 LBM/D BACT-PSD 0 0

CT-0066 PRATT & WHITNEY, UTC PRATT & WHITNEY, UTC CT 1

CONNECTICUT DEPT OF 

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTION 053-0047 110017435701 U OVEN 41.001 2.31 LB/H LUCITE VOC A INCINERATOR 0.0043 LB/H BACT-PSD 99.9 0

IN-0126 DEAN BALDWIN PAINTING LP

DEAN BALDWIN 

PAINTING LP MIAMI IN 5

INDIANA DEPT OF ENV 

MGMT, OFC OF AIR

103-

30549-

00046 4581 488190 110043976301 A

HTTP://PERMITS.A

IR.IDEM.IN.GOV/3

0549F.PDF STATIONARY AIRCRAFT REFINISHING FACILITY REFINISH OPERATION 41.001 23 GAL/H PAINT VOC P MANGAMENT AND WORK PRACTICES 4.5 LB/GAL

MONTHLY 

VOLUMEWEIGHTED 

AVERAGE OTHER CASE-BY-CASE N/A N 0 4.5 LB/GAL

MONTHLY 

VOLUMEWEIGHTED 

AVERAGE

EMISSION LIMIT 1: UNIT OF MEASURE: PER GAL OF PRIMER (LESS WATER & EXEPMT 

SOLVENTS), AS APPLIED

EMISSION LIMIT 2: UNIT OF MEASURE: PER GAL OF TOPCOATS (LESS WATER & EXEPMT 

SOLVENTS), AS APPLIED

EMISSION LIMIT 3: 4.5 LB OF VOC/ GAL OF SELF-PRIMING TOPCOATS, MONTHLY 

VOLUME-WEIGHTED AVERAGE, (LESS WATER & EXEPMT SOLVENTS), AS APPLIED

EMISSION LIMIT 4: ALL PRIMERS AND TOPCOATS (INCLUDING SELF-PRIMING 

TOPCOATS) SHALL BE APPLIED USING ONE OR MORE OF THE APPLICATION 

TECHNIQUES SPECIFIED BELOW: FLOW/CURTAIN COAT APPLICATION, DIP COAT 

APPLICATION,	ROLL COATING, BRUSH COATING, COTTON-TIPPED SWAB APPLICATION, 

ELECTRODEPOSITION (DIP) COATING, HIGH VOLUME LOW PRESSURE (HVLP) SPRAYING, 

ELECTROSTATIC SPRAY APPLICATION, OR OTHER COATING APPLICATION METHODS 

THAT ACHIEVE EMISSION REDUCTIONS EQUIVALENT TO HVLP OR ELECTROSTATIC 

SPRAY APPLICATION METHODS.

STATE BACT

CA-0889

KAL-GARD COATING & MFG., 

E/M CORP.

KAL-GARD COATING & 

MFG., E/M CORP. LOS ANGELES CA 9 SOUTH COAST AQMD, CA

328050-

55, 

328058-

59, 

328061 3769 110017408483 A TOTAL VOC LOADING OF 13.8 LB/H. SPRAY BOOTHS, NINE BRINKS, DEVILBISS & BLEKKER 41.001 40000 SCFM

ARB RECORD # A340-911-00

NINE BRINKS, DEVILBISS & BLEEKER DRY-FILTER BENCHTYPE SPRAY BOOTHS AND 5 OVENS USED TO COAT 

AEROSPACE FASTENERS, EACH VENTED TO A DIFFERENT 

INLET FAN. ACTUAL CONTROL EFF.: 97%. VOC P

BACT DETERMINATION IS USE OF ZEOLITE 

CONCENTRATOR AND THERMAL OXIDIZER. 

PERMIT LIMIT IS LB VOC/DAY FACILITY LIMIT. 216 LB/D BACT-PSD 0 0
RBLCID FACILITY_NAME

CORPORATE_OR_COMPA

NY_NAME FACILITY_COUNTY

FACILITY

_STATE

EPA_R

EGION AGENCY_NAME

PERMIT_N

UM SIC_CODE NAICS_CODE

FACILITY_REGISTRY

_SYSTEM_NUMBER

PERMIT_

TYPE PERMIT_URL FACILITY_DESCRIPTION PERMIT_NOTES PROCESS_NAME

PROCCESS_T

YPE

THROUGHPU

T THROUGHPUT_UNIT PROCESS_NOTES

CAS_NUMBE

R

CONTROL_M

ETHOD_COD

E CONTROL_METHOD_DESCRIPTION

EMISSION_LI

MIT_1

EMISSION_LI

MIT_1_UNIT

EMISSION_LI

MIT_1_AVG_

TIME_CONDI

TION CASE-BY-CASE_BASIS

OTHER_ 

APPLICABLE_

REQUIREME

NTS

OTHER_FACT

ORS

PERCENT_EF

FICIENCY EMISSION_LIMIT_2

EMISSION_LI

MIT_2_UNIT

EMISSION_LI

MIT_2_AVGE

RAGE_TIME_

CONDITION POLLUTANT_COMPLIANCE_NOTES

WA-0021

BOEING COMMERCIAL 

AIRPLANES

BOEING COMMERCIAL 

AIRPLANES WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM 88-4 372 336999 110017406476 U PAINT HANGER 41.001 33100 GAL/YR VOC P

ELECTROSTATIC SURFACE COATING, GOOD 

MFG/WORK PRACTICES 124 T/YR BACT-PSD 30 0

WA-0284

BOEING COMM AIRLINE GROUP, 

EVERETT DIV PLANT

BOEING COMM AIRLINE 

GROUP, EVERETT DIV 

PLANT SNOHOMISH WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM 91-01 3721 336411 110017406788 A MANUFACTURING AIRPLANES SURFACE COATING, AIRCRAFT 41.001 CLEANING AND PAINTING COMMERCIAL AIRLINERS VOC P

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, 

ELECTROSTATIC AIR ASSISTED AIRLESS SPRAY 

EQUIPMENT. BASELINE EMISSIONS: 237 TPY 142 T/YR BACT-PSD 65 0

WA-0283

BOEING COMM AIRLINE GROUP, 

EVERETT DIV PLANT

BOEING COMM AIRLINE 

GROUP, EVERETT DIV 

PLANT SNOHOMISH WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM 91-03 3721 336411 110017406788 A

PSD PERMIT 91-03 WAS RESCINDED ON 6/13/05. ITS TERMS 

WERE CONSOLIDATED INTO THE 2ND AMDENDMENT OF PSD 

91-06.

NEW BUILDING TO CLEAN, SEAL, TEST, AND PAINT SURFACE 

COATINGS ON AIRCRAFT WINGS, BODY SECTIONS AND SMALL 

AIRCRAFT PARTS. SURFACE COATING, AIRCRAFT 41.001 0

CLEAN, SEAL, TEST AND SURFACE COATING FOR WINGS, 

BODY 

SECTIONS AND SMALL AIRCRAFT 

PARTS. VOC P

SOLVENT SUBSTITUTION AND BEST 

MANAGMENT PRACTICES. HVLP, 

ELECTROSTATIC AIRLESS, AND MODIFIED 

HIGH EFFICIENCY AIR-ASSISTED AIRLESS 

SPRAY EQUIPMENT. BASELINE EMISSION 

RATE; 278 TPY 167 T/YR BACT-PSD 40 0

WA-0286 BOEING COMM AIRLINE GROUP KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM 91-04 3721 110017406476 D AIRPLANE MANUFACTURING SURFACE COATING, AIRCRAFT 41.001 14 AIRPLANES/MO CLEANING AND PAINTING COMMERCIAL AIRLINERS VOC P

BASELINE EMISSIONS: 182 TPY. CONTROL 

METHODS: LOW VOC COATINGS AND BEST 

MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; ELECTROSTATIC 

AIR ASSISTED SPRAY EQUIPMENT 109 T/Y BACT-PSD 65 0

WA-0287

BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRLINE 

GROUP

BOEING COMMERCIAL 

AIRLINE COMPANY - 

EVERETT FACILI SNOHOMISH WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM 91-05 3721 488119 110017406788 A

THIS PERMIT WAS RESCINDED ON 6/13/05. ITS TERMS WERE 

CONSOLIDATED INTO THE 2ND AMENDMENT OF PSD PERMIT 

91-06

START UP AND COMPLIANCE VALIDATION DATES NOT AVAILABLE, BUT OPERATIONS BEGAN SOON 

AFTER PERMIT ISSUE. SURFACE COATING, AIRCRAFT, CORROSION INHIBITOR 41.001 84 AIRPLANES/YR

SURFACE COATING OF COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE BODIES 

WITH CORROSION INHIBITOR VOC P

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. 

ELECTROSTATIC, AIR ASSISTED, OR AIRLESS 

SPRAY EQUIPMENT. BASELINE EMISSION 

RATE: 11.5 T/YR. CONTROL EFF. 15-35% 7.5 T/YR BACT-PSD 15 0

WA-0285 BOEING COMM AIRLINE GROUP

BOEING COMM AIRLINE 

GROUP SNOHOMISH WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM 91-06 3721 336411 110017406788 A

PSD PERMITS 91-03 AND 91-05 WERE RESCINDED AND 

CONSOLIDATED INTO THE 2ND AMENDMENT OF THIS PERMIT 

(PSD 91-06) ON 6/13/05.

FACILITY MODIFICATION TO ALLOW EXPANDED CAPACITY FOR 

PAINTING COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT WINGS AND TAIL COMPONENTS SURFACE COATING, AIRCRAFT PARTS 41.001

INLINE CLEAN, SEAL AND PAINT EXHAUST SYSTEM

HANGERS 40-06 AND 40-34 VOC P

SOLVENT SUBSTITUTE AND BEST 

MANAGMENT PRACTICES. HVLP SPRAY 

EQUIPMENT. BASELINE EMISSION RATE : 

167 TPY 238.8 T/YR BACT-PSD U 40 0

CA-0771

CALIFORNIA AIR NATIONAL 

GUARD, FRESNO

CALIFORNIA AIR 

NATIONAL GUARD, 

FRESNO FRESNO CA 9

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY APCD - 

CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE, 

CA

C-0216-26-

0 9711 110009266926 U HVLP APPLICATOR USED TO COAT AEROSPACE PARTS 41.001 0 ARB RECORD # A340-788-97 PM P

HVLP GUN APPLICATOR, DRY FILTERS AND 10 

BHP EXHAUST FAN 1.8 LB/DAY LAER 0 468 LB/YR

CA-0771

CALIFORNIA AIR NATIONAL 

GUARD, FRESNO

CALIFORNIA AIR 

NATIONAL GUARD, 

FRESNO FRESNO CA 9

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY APCD - 

CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE, 

CA

C-0216-26-

0 9711 110009266926 U HVLP APPLICATOR USED TO COAT AEROSPACE PARTS 41.001 0 ARB RECORD # A340-788-97 VOC P

LOWEST AVAILABLE VOC CONTENT WHICH 

MEETS MILITARY SPECIFICATIONS 20.9 LB/DAY LAER 0 2000 LB/YR

UT-0058 HILL AIR FORCE BASE HILL AIR FORCE BASE DAVIS UT 8

UTAH DEPARTMENT OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY

DAQE1087-97 4581 110017286435 U

THIS IS AN APPROVAL ORDER MODIFICATION OF EXPERIMENTAL APPROVAL ORDER DAQE-1047-95 

TO ALLOW PERMANENT OPERATION OF ZEOLITE ADSORPTION SYSTEM TO CONTROL VOC 

EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT PAINTING OPERATIONS IN BUILDING 220 AT HILL AIR FORCE BASE. SURFACE COATING, MILITARY AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 41.001 125 AIRCRAFT PER YEAR

PERFORMANCE CERTIFIED DURING PILOT PLANT STUDY 

AND RE-VERIFIED EVERY 3 YEARS PILOT PLANT STUDY 

AUTHORIZED IN DAQE-1047-95. VOC A

ZEOLITE ADSORPTION SYSTEM - M&W 

CONDESORB FOB - 26ZEOLITE ADSORPTION 

CELLS - 100,000 ACFM@80 

DEGREESFARENHEIT - MAX LOADING 122 LB 

VOC/HR 201 T/YR Other Case-by-Case 95 0

UT-0058 HILL AIR FORCE BASE HILL AIR FORCE BASE DAVIS UT 8

UTAH DEPARTMENT OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY

DAQE1087-97 4581 110017286435 U

THIS IS AN APPROVAL ORDER MODIFICATION OF EXPERIMENTAL APPROVAL ORDER DAQE-1047-95 

TO ALLOW PERMANENT OPERATION OF ZEOLITE ADSORPTION SYSTEM TO CONTROL VOC 

EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT PAINTING OPERATIONS IN BUILDING 220 AT HILL AIR FORCE BASE. SURFACE COATING, MILITARY AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS 41.001 125 AIRCRAFT PER YEAR

PERFORMANCE CERTIFIED DURING PILOT PLANT STUDY 

AND RE-VERIFIED EVERY 3 YEARS PILOT PLANT STUDY 

AUTHORIZED IN DAQE-1047-95. HAP A

ZEOLITE ADSORPTION SYSTEM - M&W 

CONDESORB FOB - 26ZEOLITE ADSORPTION 

CELLS 0 Other Case-by-Case 90 0

WA-0344 RENTON

BOEING COMMERCIAL 

AIRPLANE GROUP KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD 08-01 3721 336411 110015518965 B

THEY MAKE AIRPLANES. THIS PERMIT IS FOR A PAINT 

BOOTH/HANGAR. PAINT BOOTH/HANGAR 41.001 VOC P

COMPOLIANCE WITH 40 CFR PART 63, 

SUBPART GG AND LOW VOC VAPOR 

PRESSURE CLEANING SOLVENTS AND 

STRIPPERS WITH LOW PRESSURE 

APPLICATORS OR MANUAL APPLICATION 

FOR DEPAINTING. 40.8 T/YR

12 MONTH 

ROLLING 

AVERAGE BACT-PSD U 0 0

WA-0326 BOEING EVERETT FACILITY

BOEING COMMERCIAL 

AIRPLANE GROUP SNOHOMISH WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-05-02 3721 336411 110017406788 C

 

CITY OF EVERETT IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE 

EVERETT FACILITY IS SITUATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 

10 AND THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 28N, 

RANGE 4E WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. THE EVERETT FACILITY EXTERIOR COATING OPERATIONS 41.001 VOC N 412 T/YR

12 

CONSECUTIV

E MONTHS N/A U 0 0

2.3.	VOC EMISSIONS FROM PAINT HANGAR FINAL EXTERIOR COATING SHALL NOT 

EXCEED 412 TONS IN ANY 12 CONSECUTIVE MONTHS.

WA-0326 BOEING EVERETT FACILITY

BOEING COMMERCIAL 

AIRPLANE GROUP SNOHOMISH WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-05-02 3721 336411 110017406788 C

THE BOEING COMPANY¿S EVERETT FACILITY IS LOCATED IN THE 

CITY OF EVERETT IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE 

EVERETT FACILITY IS SITUATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 

10 AND THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 28N, 

RANGE 4E WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. THE EVERETT FACILITY 

CONSISTS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH COMPLEX LOCATED FINAL ASSEMBLY 41.001 VOC N 49 T/YR

12 

CONSECUTIV

E MONTHS N/A U 0 0

3.3.	VOC EMISSIONS FROM 787 FINAL ASSEMBLY SHALL NOT EXCEED 49 TONS IN ANY 

12 CONSECUTIVE MONTHS.

WA-0326 BOEING EVERETT FACILITY

BOEING COMMERCIAL 

AIRPLANE GROUP SNOHOMISH WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-05-02 3721 336411 110017406788 C

 

CITY OF EVERETT IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE 

EVERETT FACILITY IS SITUATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 

10 AND THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 28N, 

RANGE 4E WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. THE EVERETT FACILITY 

CONSISTS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH COMPLEX LOCATED 

NORTH AND SOUTH, RESPECTIVELY, OF STATE ROUTE 526. A INTERIORS MANUFACTURING 41.005 VOC N 205 T/YR

12 

CONSECUTIV

E MONTHS N/A U 0 0

VOC EMISSIONS FROM INTERIORS MANUFACTURING SHALL NOT EXCEED 205 TONS IN 

ANY 12 CONSECUTIVE MONTHS.

WA-0330 BOEING EVERETT

BOEING COMMERCIAL 

AIRPLANE GROUP SNOHOMISH WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-05-02 3721 336411 41585464 D

THE BOEING COMPANY¿S EVERETT FACILITY IS LOCATED IN THE 

CITY OF EVERETT IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE 

EVERETT FACILITY IS SITUATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 

10 AND THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 28N, 

RANGE 4E WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. THE EVERETT FACILITY 

CONSISTS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH COMPLEX LOCATED 

NORTH AND SOUTH, RESPECTIVELY, OF STATE ROUTE 526. A 

BUILDING NUMBER STARTING WITH 40 IDENTIFIES NORTH 

BOEING PLANS TO ASSEMBLE THE NEW MODEL 787 AIRPLANE AND MANUFACTURE SOME 787 

COMPONENTS (E.G., INTERIORS) AT THE EVERETT FACILITY. UNLIKE PREVIOUS AIRPLANE 

MANUFACTURING PROGRAMS, MORE OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE OF THE 787 (E.G., WINGS, 

FUSELAGE SECTIONS, AND EMPENNAGE) WILL BE MANUFACTURED, ASSEMBLED, AND HAVE 

SYSTEMS INSTALLED BY SUPPLIERS AND SENT TO THE BOEING FACILITY FOR FINAL ASSEMBLY. A 

NEW FEATURE OF THE 787 AIRPLANE IS THAT MORE OF THE AIRPLANE, INCLUDING THE FUSELAGE 

AND WING STRUCTURE, WILL BE PRIMARILY MADE OF COMPOSITES RATHER THAN METAL. PAINT HANGAR FINAL EXTERIOR COATING 41.001

AFTER FINAL ASSEMBLY OPERATIONS THE AIRPLANE WILL 

BE MOVED TO A PAINT HANGAR FOR FINAL EXTERIOR 

COATING. FINAL EXTERIOR COATING WILL CONSIST OF 

SOLVENT CLEANING, REACTIVATION OF THE TOP COAT, 

APPLYING SEVERAL COATS OF PAINT ALONG WITH LOGOS, 

REGISTRATION NUMBERS, WARNING SIGNS AND TOUCHUP PAINTING (IF NECESSARY). VOC P

10.	A BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL 

TECHNOLOGY (BACT) REVIEW WAS NOT 

REQUIRED BECAUSE ECOLOGY DETERMINED 

THAT THERE WAS NO PHYSICAL CHANGE, OR 

CHANGE IN THE METHOD OF OPERATION, 

THAT CAUSES, OR RESULTS, IN AN 

EMISSIONS INCREASE. MO 412 T/YR BACT-PSD

NESHAP , 

OTHER U 0 0

WA-0330 BOEING EVERETT

BOEING COMMERCIAL 

AIRPLANE GROUP SNOHOMISH WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-05-02 3721 336411 41585464 D

THE BOEING COMPANY¿S EVERETT FACILITY IS LOCATED IN THE 

CITY OF EVERETT IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE 

EVERETT FACILITY IS SITUATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 

10 AND THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 28N, 

RANGE 4E WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. THE EVERETT FACILITY 

CONSISTS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH COMPLEX LOCATED 

NORTH AND SOUTH, RESPECTIVELY, OF STATE ROUTE 526. A 

BUILDING NUMBER STARTING WITH 40 IDENTIFIES NORTH 

COMPLEX BUILDINGS, AND BUILDINGS ON THE SOUTH 

COMPLEX ARE IDENTIFIED WITH A NUMBER STARTING WITH 

45. BOEING CURRENTLY MANUFACTURES 747, 767, AND 777 

MODEL AIRPLANES AT THE EVERETT FACILITY, AS WELL AS 

BOEING PLANS TO ASSEMBLE THE NEW MODEL 787 AIRPLANE AND MANUFACTURE SOME 787 

COMPONENTS (E.G., INTERIORS) AT THE EVERETT FACILITY. UNLIKE PREVIOUS AIRPLANE 

MANUFACTURING PROGRAMS, MORE OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE OF THE 787 (E.G., WINGS, 

FUSELAGE SECTIONS, AND EMPENNAGE) WILL BE MANUFACTURED, ASSEMBLED, AND HAVE 

SYSTEMS INSTALLED BY SUPPLIERS AND SENT TO THE BOEING FACILITY FOR FINAL ASSEMBLY. A 

NEW FEATURE OF THE 787 AIRPLANE IS THAT MORE OF THE AIRPLANE, INCLUDING THE FUSELAGE 

AND WING STRUCTURE, WILL BE PRIMARILY MADE OF COMPOSITES RATHER THAN METAL. 787 FINAL ASSEMBLY 99.999

FINAL ASSEMBLY OPERATIONS WILL FOR THE 787 MODEL 

INCLUDE JOINING THE BODY SECTIONS INTO A COMPLETE 

FUSELAGE, JOINING THE WINGS, VERTICAL FIN, AND 

HORIZONTAL STABILIZERS, HANGING THE ENGINES AND 

INSTALLING THE MAIN LANDING GEAR. ASSEMBLY 

OPERATIONS WILL BE LARGELY MECHANICAL IN NATURE 

ALTHOUGH THESE ACTIVITIES WILL RESULT IN EMISSIONS 

FROM SOLVENT CLEANING, TOUCH-UP SPRAY COATING, 

AND THE USE OF ADHESIVES, SEALANTS AND OTHER 

COATINGS. VOC P

10.	A BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL 

TECHNOLOGY (BACT) REVIEW WAS NOT 

REQUIRED BECAUSE ECOLOGY DETERMINED 

THAT THERE WAS NO PHYSICAL CHANGE, OR 

CHANGE IN THE METHOD OF OPERATION, 

THAT CAUSES, OR RESULTS, IN AN 

EMISSIONS INCREASE. MO 49 T/YR BACT-PSD

NESHAP , 

OTHER U 0 0

WA-0330 BOEING EVERETT

BOEING COMMERCIAL 

AIRPLANE GROUP SNOHOMISH WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-05-02 3721 336411 41585464 D

THE BOEING COMPANY¿S EVERETT FACILITY IS LOCATED IN THE 

CITY OF EVERETT IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE 

EVERETT FACILITY IS SITUATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 

10 AND THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 28N, 

RANGE 4E WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. THE EVERETT FACILITY 

CONSISTS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH COMPLEX LOCATED 

NORTH AND SOUTH, RESPECTIVELY, OF STATE ROUTE 526. A 

BUILDING NUMBER STARTING WITH 40 IDENTIFIES NORTH 

BOEING PLANS TO ASSEMBLE THE NEW MODEL 787 AIRPLANE AND MANUFACTURE SOME 787 

COMPONENTS (E.G., INTERIORS) AT THE EVERETT FACILITY. UNLIKE PREVIOUS AIRPLANE 

MANUFACTURING PROGRAMS, MORE OF THE MAIN STRUCTURE OF THE 787 (E.G., WINGS, 

FUSELAGE SECTIONS, AND EMPENNAGE) WILL BE MANUFACTURED, ASSEMBLED, AND HAVE 

SYSTEMS INSTALLED BY SUPPLIERS AND SENT TO THE BOEING FACILITY FOR FINAL ASSEMBLY. A 

NEW FEATURE OF THE 787 AIRPLANE IS THAT MORE OF THE AIRPLANE, INCLUDING THE FUSELAGE 

AND WING STRUCTURE, WILL BE PRIMARILY MADE OF COMPOSITES RATHER THAN METAL. INTERIORS MANUFACTURING 99.999 VOC P

10.	A BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL 

TECHNOLOGY (BACT) REVIEW WAS NOT 

REQUIRED BECAUSE ECOLOGY DETERMINED 

THAT THERE WAS NO PHYSICAL CHANGE, OR 

CHANGE IN THE METHOD OF OPERATION, 

THAT CAUSES, OR RESULTS, IN AN 

EMISSIONS INCREASE. MO 205 T/YR BACT-PSD

NESHAP , 

OTHER U 0 0

WA-0340 BOEING EVERETT THE BOEING COMPANY SNOHOMISH WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-06-04 3721 325510 110005340489 C

 

EXISTING PAINT HANGARS, I.E., BUILDINGS 45-01, 45-03, AND 

45-04 LOCATED TO THE SOUTH OF STATE ROUTE 526. DUE TO 

INCREASED MARKET DEMAND FOR THESE AIRPLANES, 

PREDICTED PRODUCTION RATES FOR 2009 AND BEYOND MAY 

EXCEED THE RATE AT WHICH AIRPLANES CAN BE PAINTED IN 

THE THREE EXISTING HANGARS. THEREFORE, BOEING PLANS 

TO CONSTRUCT A NEW FOURTH AIRPLANE HANGAR AT THE 

EVERETT FACILITY TO ACCOMMODATE THE INCREASED 

PRODUCTION RATE. 

THE NEW PAINT HANGAR IS EXPECTED TO BE BUILT ADJACENT PAINT HANGAR/FINAL EXTERIOR COATING 41.001

THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONSISTS OF CONSTRUCTING A 

NEW PAINT HANGAR TO PAINT AIRPLANES, INCLUDING 

747, 767, 777, AND 787 MODEL AIRPLANES. IN ADDITION 

TO EQUIPMENT FOR AIRPLANE CLEANING AND COATING 

OPERATIONS IN THE HANGAR BAY, THE PAINT HANGAR 

WILL ALSO INCLUDE UP TO EIGHT NEW SOLVENT 

CLEANING BENCHES, A NEW PAINT STRIPPING BOOTH, A 

NEW SOLVENT RECOVERY SYSTEM, TWO NEW PAINT MIX 

BOOTHS, AND A NEW RUDDER SPRAY BOOTH. VOC P 412 T

ANY 12 

CONSECUTIV

E MONTHS Other Case-by-Case NESHAP U 0 0

*WA-0348 BOEING RENTON THE BOEING COMPANY KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

PSD-08-01 

AMENDM

ENT 2 3721 336411 C

http://www.ecy.w

a.gov/programs/ai

r/psd/psd_existing

permits.html

The Boeing Renton facility is located in the city of Renton in 

King County, Washington, and began operation in 1942. It 

occupies 339 acres, and currently manufactures parts for and 

assembles the 737 series airplane model. The facility is located 

in the south half of Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5, 

Willamette Meridian. It is bounded to the north by Lake 

Washington, to the south by Airport Way, to the east by Logan 

Avenue, and to the west by the Renton Airport

Boeing Renton increased VOC emissions at Buildings 4-20, 4-21, 4-81, and 4-82. The 118 tpy VOC 

limit was eliminated and incoorporated into a facility limit of 750 tpy in PSD-12-01. P1 Painting Operations 41.001 6 depainted airplanes

No more than 6 airplanes may be depainted in Building 5-

50 in any 12 consecutive months
RBLCID FACILITY_NAME

CORPORATE_OR_COMPA

NY_NAME FACILITY_COUNTY

FACILITY

_STATE

EPA_R

EGION AGENCY_NAME

PERMIT_N

UM SIC_CODE NAICS_CODE

FACILITY_REGISTRY

_SYSTEM_NUMBER

PERMIT_

TYPE PERMIT_URL FACILITY_DESCRIPTION PERMIT_NOTES PROCESS_NAME

PROCCESS_T

YPE

THROUGHPU

T THROUGHPUT_UNIT PROCESS_NOTES

CAS_NUMBE

R

CONTROL_M

ETHOD_COD

E CONTROL_METHOD_DESCRIPTION

EMISSION_LI

MIT_1

EMISSION_LI

MIT_1_UNIT

EMISSION_LI

MIT_1_AVG_

TIME_CONDI

TION CASE-BY-CASE_BASIS

OTHER_ 

APPLICABLE_

REQUIREME

NTS

OTHER_FACT

ORS

PERCENT_EF

FICIENCY EMISSION_LIMIT_2

EMISSION_LI

MIT_2_UNIT

EMISSION_LI

MIT_2_AVGE

RAGE_TIME_

CONDITION POLLUTANT_COMPLIANCE_NOTES

*WA-0348 BOEING RENTON THE BOEING COMPANY KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

PSD-08-01 

AMENDM

ENT 2 3721 336411 C

http://www.ecy.w

a.gov/programs/ai

r/psd/psd_existing

permits.html

The Boeing Renton facility is located in the city of Renton in 

King County, Washington, and began operation in 1942. It 

occupies 339 acres, and currently manufactures parts for and 

assembles the 737 series airplane model. The facility is located 

in the south half of Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5, 

Willamette Meridian. It is bounded to the north by Lake 

Washington, to the south by Airport Way, to the east by Logan 

Avenue, and to the west by the Renton Airport

Boeing Renton increased VOC emissions at Buildings 4-20, 4-21, 4-81, and 4-82. The 118 tpy VOC 

limit was eliminated and incoorporated into a facility limit of 750 tpy in PSD-12-01. Final exterior coating Building 5-50 41.001 0 VOC P

low VOC primers, coatings, and solvents. 

Application requirements. composite vapor 

pressure of 45 mm Hg @ 20 degree C 40.8 TONS

12 

CONSECUTIV

E MONTHS BACT-PSD U 0 0

*WA-0347 BOEING RENTON THE BOEING COMPANY KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-12-01 3721 336411 D

http://www.ecy.w

a.gov/programs/ai

r/psd/psd_existing

permits.html

The Boeing Renton facility is located in the city of Renton in 

King County, Washington, and began operation in 1942. It 

occupies 339 acres, and currently manufactures parts for and 

assembles the 737 series airplane model. The facility is located 

in the south half of Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5, 

Willamette Meridian. It is bounded to the north by Lake 

Washington, to the south by Airport Way, to the east by Logan 

Avenue, and to the west by the Renton Airport Floor Activities 41.001 504 airplanes per year

Floor activities include but are not limited to spar, wing, 

and aircraft assembly. VOC P

Boeing must comply with all applicable VOC 

emission standards of the National Emission 

Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and 

Rework Facilities, 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart 

GG (Aerospace NESHAP), as in effect on 

February 19, 2013 458 TONS YEAR BACT-PSD NESHAP U 0 0

*WA-0347 BOEING RENTON THE BOEING COMPANY KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-12-01 3721 336411 D

http://www.ecy.w

a.gov/programs/ai

r/psd/psd_existing

permits.html

The Boeing Renton facility is located in the city of Renton in 

King County, Washington, and began operation in 1942. It 

occupies 339 acres, and currently manufactures parts for and 

assembles the 737 series airplane model. The facility is located 

in the south half of Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5, 

Willamette Meridian. It is bounded to the north by Lake 

Washington, to the south by Airport Way, to the east by Logan 

Avenue, and to the west by the Renton Airport New Vertical Wing Booth (PB5) 41.001 0 VOC P

Boeing must comply with all applicable VOC 

emission standards of the National Emission 

Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and 

Rework Facilities, 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart 

GG (Aerospace NESHAP), as in effect on 

February 19, 2013 65

LB PER 

WING

12-MONTH 

ROLLING BACT-PSD NESHAP U 0 0

*WA-0347 BOEING RENTON THE BOEING COMPANY KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-12-01 3721 336411 D

http://www.ecy.w

a.gov/programs/ai

r/psd/psd_existing

permits.html

The Boeing Renton facility is located in the city of Renton in 

King County, Washington, and began operation in 1942. It 

occupies 339 acres, and currently manufactures parts for and 

assembles the 737 series airplane model. The facility is located 

in the south half of Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5, 

Willamette Meridian. It is bounded to the north by Lake 

Washington, to the south by Airport Way, to the east by Logan 

Avenue, and to the west by the Renton Airport New Vertical Wing Booth (PB6) 41.001 0 VOC P

Boeing must comply with all applicable VOC 

emission standards of the National Emission 

Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and 

Rework Facilities, 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart 

GG (Aerospace NESHAP), as in effect on 

February 19, 2013 65

LB PER 

WING

12-MONTH 

ROLLING BACT-PSD NESHAP U 0 0

*WA-0347 BOEING RENTON THE BOEING COMPANY KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-12-01 3721 336411 D

http://www.ecy.w

a.gov/programs/ai

r/psd/psd_existing

permits.html

The Boeing Renton facility is located in the city of Renton in 

King County, Washington, and began operation in 1942. It 

occupies 339 acres, and currently manufactures parts for and 

assembles the 737 series airplane model. The facility is located 

in the south half of Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5, 

Willamette Meridian. It is bounded to the north by Lake 

Washington, to the south by Airport Way, to the east by Logan 

Avenue, and to the west by the Renton Airport New Vertical Wing Booth (PB7) 41.001 0 VOC P

Boeing must comply with all applicable VOC 

emission standards of the National Emission 

Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and 

Rework Facilities, 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart 

GG (Aerospace NESHAP), as in effect on 

February 19, 2013 65

LB PER 

WING

12-MONTH 

ROLLING BACT-PSD NESHAP U 0 0

*WA-0347 BOEING RENTON THE BOEING COMPANY KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-12-01 3721 336411 D

http://www.ecy.w

a.gov/programs/ai

r/psd/psd_existing

permits.html

The Boeing Renton facility is located in the city of Renton in 

King County, Washington, and began operation in 1942. It 

occupies 339 acres, and currently manufactures parts for and 

assembles the 737 series airplane model. The facility is located 

in the south half of Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5, 

Willamette Meridian. It is bounded to the north by Lake 

Washington, to the south by Airport Way, to the east by Logan 

Avenue, and to the west by the Renton Airport New Corrosion Inhibitor Compound Booth (CB1) 41.001 0 VOC P

Boeing must comply with all applicable VOC 

emission standards of the National Emission 

Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and 

Rework Facilities, 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart 

GG (Aerospace NESHAP), as in effect on 

February 19, 2013 7.7 LB/WING

12-MONTH 

ROLLING BACT-PSD NESHAP U 0 0

*WA-0347 BOEING RENTON THE BOEING COMPANY KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-12-01 3721 336411 D

http://www.ecy.w

a.gov/programs/ai

r/psd/psd_existing

permits.html

The Boeing Renton facility is located in the city of Renton in 

King County, Washington, and began operation in 1942. It 

occupies 339 acres, and currently manufactures parts for and 

assembles the 737 series airplane model. The facility is located 

in the south half of Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5, 

Willamette Meridian. It is bounded to the north by Lake 

Washington, to the south by Airport Way, to the east by Logan 

Avenue, and to the west by the Renton Airport New Corrosion Inhibitor Compound Booth (CB2) 41.001 0 VOC P

Boeing must comply with all applicable VOC 

emission standards of the National Emission 

Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and 

Rework Facilities, 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart 

GG (Aerospace NESHAP), as in effect on 

February 19, 2013 7.7

LB PER 

WING

12-MONTH 

ROLLING BACT-PSD NESHAP U 0 0

*WA-0347 BOEING RENTON THE BOEING COMPANY KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-12-01 3721 336411 D

http://www.ecy.w

a.gov/programs/ai

r/psd/psd_existing

permits.html

The Boeing Renton facility is located in the city of Renton in 

King County, Washington, and began operation in 1942. It 

occupies 339 acres, and currently manufactures parts for and 

assembles the 737 series airplane model. The facility is located 

in the south half of Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5, 

Willamette Meridian. It is bounded to the north by Lake 

Washington, to the south by Airport Way, to the east by Logan 

Avenue, and to the west by the Renton Airport New Corrosion Inhibitor Compound Booth (CB3) 41.001 0 VOC P

Boeing must comply with all applicable VOC 

emission standards of the National Emission 

Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and 

Rework Facilities, 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart 

GG (Aerospace NESHAP), as in effect on 

February 19, 2013 7.7

LB PER 

WING

12-MONTH 

ROLLING U 0 0

*WA-0347 BOEING RENTON THE BOEING COMPANY KING WA 10

WASHINGTON STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; 

AIR QUALITY PROGRAM PSD-12-01 3721 336411 D

http://www.ecy.w

a.gov/programs/ai

r/psd/psd_existing

permits.html

The Boeing Renton facility is located in the city of Renton in 

King County, Washington, and began operation in 1942. It 

occupies 339 acres, and currently manufactures parts for and 

assembles the 737 series airplane model. The facility is located 

in the south half of Section 18, Township 23N, Range 5, 

Willamette Meridian. It is bounded to the north by Lake 

Washington, to the south by Airport Way, to the east by Logan 

Avenue, and to the west by the Renton Airport New Paint Hangar (P-7/P-8) 41.001 0 VOC P

Boeing must comply with all applicable VOC 

emission standards of the National Emission 

Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and 

Rework Facilities, 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart 

GG (Aerospace NESHAP), as in effect on 

February 19, 2013 1350

LB PER 

PLANE

12-MONTH 

ROLLING BACT-PSD NESHAP U 0 0

CA-0685 T.B.M. INC. T.B.M. INC. CA 9

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY APCD - 

CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE, 

CA S-192-2-0 4581 110005996529 U AIRCRAFT REFINISHING OPERATION 41.001 11 GAL COATING/DAY PM P HVLP SPRAY GUN 0 SEE P2 Other Case-by-Case 0 0

CA-0685 T.B.M. INC. T.B.M. INC. CA 9

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY APCD - 

CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE, 

CA S-192-2-0 4581 110005996529 U AIRCRAFT REFINISHING OPERATION 41.001 11 GAL COATING/DAY VOC P

LOW-VOC COATINGS AND HERCULES GW/R 

ENCLOSED GUN 38.5 LBM/DAY Other Case-by-Case 0 0

OK-0012 ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL

ROCKWELL 

INTERNATIONAL OK 6

TULSA CITY-COUNTY HEALTH 

DEPARTMENT, OK T80-43 110017432679 U

1) MASKANT & COATINGS RELATED TO COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT BODY SECTION PRODUCTION, 

PERMIT LIMITS PRODUCTION TO 144 SHIP SETS PER YEAR. 2) BATCH TYPE COATINGS OPERATIONS 

NEGATES MEANINGFUL HOURLY EMISSION RATE. BOND PRIME, PRIME & ENAMEL COATING SYS 41.001 0 NOTE #1 VOC A CARBON ADSORPTION UNIT 18.4

T/YR 

UNCONT.,N

OTE#2 BACT-PSD 80 3.4

T/YR 

CONT.,NOTE

#2

OK-0012 ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL

ROCKWELL 

INTERNATIONAL OK 6

TULSA CITY-COUNTY HEALTH 

DEPARTMENT, OK T80-43 110017432679 U

1) MASKANT & COATINGS RELATED TO COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT BODY SECTION PRODUCTION, 

PERMIT LIMITS PRODUCTION TO 144 SHIP SETS PER YEAR. 2) BATCH TYPE COATINGS OPERATIONS 

NEGATES MEANINGFUL HOURLY EMISSION RATE. CHEM MASKANT ON ACFT SKINS 41.001 0 NOTE #1 VOC A CARBON ADSORPTION 202

T/YR 

UNCONT.,N

OTE#2 BACT-PSD 90 0