alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Bellwood clock undergoes much needed facelift

/ Published Sept. 23, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
The grandfather clock once owned by James Bellwood, the last private owner of the land which is now part of Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, is back to keeping accurate time as it once did 135 years ago.

The clock sits in the foyer of the Bellwood Manor on DSCR. Bellwood brought this clock with him when he moved from Canada down to Virginia in 1887. The original manor home was built between 1797 and 1803 by Richard Gregory and is an example of the Georgian-style architecture favored by Virginia planters during the 18th century. It’s one of the oldest houses in Chesterfield County, Virginia and is listed as a national historic landmark. Bellwood purchased the property in 1887.

Jimmy Parrish, chief of Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management’s Environmental Management Division, said back in April, the inner workings of the clock were removed from the cabinet, taken off site, repaired, and reinstalled back into the cabinet at the end of June. Parrish said some of the new parts had to be handmade.

For more information on the history of the Bellwood Manor and the installation, please visit the Installation History page.
# DLA Troop Support earns award for supporting National Guard, Reserve employees

/ Published Oct. 7, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support was presented with the Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve “Above and Beyond Award” October 7, in Philadelphia for support of their full-time employees who are also National Guard and Reserve military members.

The award, presented by ESGR’s Pennsylvania Chair Emeritus retired Army Maj. Gen. Wesley Craig, was received by DLA Troop Support Deputy Commander Richard Ellis, who expressed his thanks on behalf of the organization.

“We appreciate it,” Ellis said. “We have a large number of former, retired or resigned military personnel, and a large contingent of reservists. And I often, as much as I can ... say that this workforce has some of the hardest working, dedicated, patriotic employees that I’ve ever had the pleasure of working with.”

The organization was nominated for the ESGR Freedom Award, and though it did not make the final cut for national recognition at that level, Craig said, it was “so strong” in terms of command climate and support to guardsman and reservists, that the state board convened to provide recognition.

“Certainly DLA [Troop Support] here ... is very supportive of the Guard and Reserve,” Craig said. “So I want to say thank you, on behalf of ... all of us that serve in the Guard and Reserve.”

Ellis also mentioned that not only leaders, but the workforce-at-large understand the support to military members as evidenced in the organization’s climate and culture survey, where employees provide feedback on the overall mission and work climate.

“What do we do best ... by far and wide, is support the warfighter,” Ellis said.
#### Sabre, Inc., et al., Respondents, v The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania et al., Appellants.

[52 NYS3d 355]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered December 5, 2016, which, insofar as appealed from, declared that defendants had a duty to defend plaintiffs in the underlying actions and that a conflict of interest precluded them from controlling the defense in those actions, struck the 24th affirmative defense, and denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and declaring that they had no duty to defend or indemnify plaintiffs in the underlying actions, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The pleadings in the underlying actions allege facts within the scope of coverage under the subject insurance policies, giving rise under Texas law to the duty to defend *(see GuideOne Elite Ins. Co. v Fielder Rd. Baptist Church,*197 SW3d 305, 308 [Tex 2006]). Because the facts to be adjudicated in the underlying actions were the same facts upon which coverage depended, a conflict of interest existed that precluded defendants from controlling the defense in those actions *(Northern County Mut. Ins. Co. v Davalos,*140 SW3d 685, 689 [Tex 2004]).

We reject defendants’ contention that plaintiffs never notified defendant Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ICSP) of the underlying claims or requested a defense from it. As conceded by ICSP, plaintiffs did eventually provide it notice of the claim. Because of its conflict of interest with its insured, ICSP could not have participated in the defense of the underlying action prior to its receipt of the notice, and has failed to show that it was prejudiced as required by the contract by Sabre’s failure to provide notice on a timely basis.

Given the conflict of interest that precluded defendants from controlling the defense in the underlying actions, the motion court correctly dismissed the 24th affirmative defense insofar as it was based on litigation management guidelines included in the Chartis policy that required the claims handler’s involvement in managing the underlying litigation. In addition, as to the limitations as set forth in Endorsement 4 that fees be charged by council on an hourly basis, there is evidence in the record that, as a matter of practice, the firm selected by plaintiffs to represent them did not bill by the hour, and yet it was included on the schedule of counsel in Endorsement 4, and Chartis specifically approved its representation of plaintiffs.

*590The court correctly determined that issues of fact exist as to plaintiffs’ claims for prompt payment under Texas Insurance Code § 542.058 (a), which requires an insurer to pay a claim within 60 days after being provided all items, statements, and forms reasonably requested.

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
# Employee recognition, COVID-19 updates key topics at Troop Support commander’s town hall

/ Published Oct. 29, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employees tuned into a commander’s town hall event virtually and in-person Oct. 26 in Philadelphia.

Army Brig. Gen. Eric P. Shirley provided business and personnel updates to the workforce in addition to presenting individual and team awards.

"Thank you from the bottom of my heart for everything you do every day which is impactful around the world,” Shirley said. “I've been tremendously impressed with that consistent excellence over time."

Among those recognized was Medical Director of Supplier Operations Daniel Keefe, who earned the Defense Meritorious Civilian Service Award for his contributions to DLA Troop Support’s COVID-19 efforts. The award is the second highest civilian honor in the Department of Defense.

“When the DOD has a critical mission, when they have a ‘no-fail’ requirement, the go-to command has been the Defense Logistics Agency, and in turn Troop Support,” Shirley said. “We have the superstar performers here that get the mission done each and every time, and [that] certainly merits this level of recognition.”

Shirley also highlighted Troop Support’s contributions to DLA’s COVID-19 support in fiscal 2021.

“Without DLA Troop Support, I don’t know who would’ve done this for the nation,” Shirley said.

From a workforce perspective, Shirley discussed the organization’s future of work and introduced Troop Support Human Resources Customer Account Manager Katherine McMahon to talk about the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees.

McMahon recommended employees visit the constantly updated DLA Coronavirus Information website for further guidance and frequently asked questions.

Shirley acknowledged Troop Support’s accomplishments throughout fiscal year 2021, including year end sales of $21.5 billion, which made up 54% of DLA’s total sales.

“Hats off to all of you. You did this work,” Shirley said.

In closing, Shirley emphasized accomplishments across each supply chain, with encouragement to always “start with why.”

“Let’s never be over content with what we’ve achieved. We always need to focus how we can do it better for the warfighter,” Shirley said. “Not for sales, but at the end of the day, the reason that we’re here - start with why - is to provide world-class logistics support, prompt and uninterrupted sustainment to warfighters around the world.”

Employees can view the town hall here.
# Employee Reflection: Sue Collins

/ Published Jan. 20, 2022
BATTLE CREEK, Mich. , 
                Employee Reflection: Sue Collins                            Get to know DLA Disposition Services Contracting Directorate's Procurement Analyst Sue Collins.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Kelly BurellVIRIN: 220104-D-D0441-217

## Sue Collins

### Procurement AnalystBattle Creek, Michigan

**Describe your job in a sentence or two. What do you do specifically?**  I provide support to the Contracting Directorate and to the field.  My job title is Procurement Analyst and I monitor the Federal Procurement Data System, alternate Government Purchase Card, agency/organization program coordinator, training coordinator, security representative and small business program representative.

**How long have you worked for DLA Disposition Services?**  All 36 years of my federal service.

**What is your favorite memory with DLA Disposition Services?**  All the awesome people I’ve been so fortunate to have met and worked with and the friends I’ve made along the way.  I think back over the many years I’ve been with the government and that’s what stands out. 

**What aspect of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction and why?**  Providing support and assistance to my coworkers and knowing we are all supporting the warfighter.  That’s what it’s all about. 

**What is the best piece of advice someone has given you?**  Stay true to yourself.

**What kind of training and education helps your work performance in your current role?**  In the Contracting 1102 career field we have mandatory Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act training and education requirements we must complete.  I have completed all requirements and am Level 2 DAWIA certified.

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?** We’re here to support you in any way we can.  Thank you for your service and all that you do to keep us safe.

**Where do you see yourself five years from now?**  Retired.

**What was your first job?**  GS-2, Clerk-typist, in the Personnel Office.

**Name your favorite/recent book(s) you have read.**  Anything by James Patterson.  The last one I read was “Judge and Jury.”

**What is your favorite quote?** “Be the things you loved most about the people who are gone.” – Unknown

**What did you want to be when you grew up?**  Out of high school, I planned on being a legal secretary.

**Who is your hero?**  My dad, who has passed.  He was the kindest person I know and never had a bad word to say about anyone.

----

Tracy Hart, director of DLA Disposition Services Contracting Directorate said, “Sue is a stellar employee and I’m glad she is being highlighted.  She is very low key, tries to stay out of the limelight and does an outstanding job!”
SERVED JANUARY 3, 2011 

-''^'RTMENTOF 

' NSPORWiON 

e 'l OPERATIONS 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS : il JAN-U A S^ 3 1 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FREEDOM AIRLINES INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09SW0005 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

DMS FAA-2009-0980 

ORDER ON STATUS OF CASE 

In prior pleadings the Agency notified the undersigned that the matter is pending 

settlement subject to the approval of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. 

WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDER as follows: 

1. The parties are hereby directed to notify the Judge, in writing, by February 1, 2011, 

the status of this case and status of settlement. 

GchardlJ. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment(s) - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09SW0005 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention; Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Christopher Pappaioanou, Respondent's Counsel 

Director, Legal Affairs 

Mesa Air Group 

410 North 44th Street, Suite 700 

Phoenix, AZ 85008 

TEL: 602-685-4000 

FAX: 602-685-4350 

Annjenet Chennault, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

.Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 MeachamBlvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5071 

FAX: 817-222-5092/5946 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suitfe 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### Long v. Long

08/23/2016

148 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 195
2017-0167.

#### State v. Kozic.

Mahoning App. No. 15 MA 0215, 2016-Ohio-8556.
MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Administrator, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Complainant, 

vs. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CERTIFIED AVIATION SERVICES, LLC 

DOCKET NO. FAA2014-0408 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Certified Aviation Services, LLC 

Respondent 

FAA Case No. 20147WP910075 

Respondent, Certified Aviation Services, LLC, wishes to withdraw its request for an 

Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing before the U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Office of Hearings, that was made on July 10, 2014. Certified Aviation Services, LLC does 

not intend to further proceed with the appeal. We understand that by withdrawing our 

request for an ALJ hearing, our appeal will be dismissed by the ALJ under 14 C.F .R. 

] I3 .2 I 5 With prejudice. Certified AviatiOn Services, LLC Wishes to Withdraw our request 

for ALI hearing because the parties, Respondent, Certified Aviation Services, LLC and 

Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration, have agreed to settle the above reference 

FAA case. 

Vice President of Administration 

Certified Aviation Services, LLC 

Attachment- Service List 

RECEIVED 

AUG 14 2n14 

HEARING DOCKET 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

ONE COPY 

The I!mwrable Riehard C. Gcedvvin, US. AdministJ ati~e Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Attn: Patricia Matthews 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

J.M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region (ANM-7) 

1601 Lind Avenue Southwest 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-277-1007 

Docket No. FAA-20014-0408 

(Civil Penalty Action)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3361-3362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-443]


North Atlantic Energy Service Corporation, Seabrook Station; 
Receipt of Petition for Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206

    Notice is hereby given that by Petition dated December 18, 1997, 
Ms. Jane Doughty (or Petitioner), representing The Seacoast Anti-
Pollution League, has requested that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission take action with regard to Seabrook Station. Petitioner 
requests that the operating license for the Seabrook Station be 
suspended until such time as a thorough root cause analysis of the 
reasons underlying the development of leaks in piping in the ``B'' 
train of the residual heat removal (RHR) system is conducted. The 
leakage was reported by the Licensee on December 5, 1997.
    As the basis for this request, Petitioner states that there have 
been past allegations of improper welding practices and substandard 
piping at Seabrook Station and further requests that the investigation 
of the RHR system pipe leakage include findings related to these past 
allegations.
    The request is being treated pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 of the 
Commission's regulations. The request has been referred to the Director 
of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. As provided by Section 
2.206, appropriate action will be taken on this Petition within a 
reasonable time.
    By letter dated January 15, 1998, the Director denied Petitioner's 
request to delay restart of the reactor at Seabrook Station, Unit 1, 
until all such actions requested by the Petition are taken.
    A copy of the Petition is available for inspection at the 
Commission's Public Document Room at 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20555-0001 and at the local public document room located at Exeter 
Public Library, Founders Park, Exeter, NH 03833.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of January 1998.


[[Page 3362]]


    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Frank J. Miraglia,
Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-1494 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50783 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ALEJANDRO JAVIER LAZOS-ORTIZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-2317-4
Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * AlejandroJavier Lazos-Ortiz (Lazos) appeals his convictions for conspiring to harbor and encourage illegal aliens, aiding and abetting the harboring of illegal aliens, and aiding and abetting the encouraging of al iens illegally entering the United States. He asserts that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions because, although there may have been some evidence linking him to some of the alien stash houses discussed at trial, there was no United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 30, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50783

2 evidence that he had ties tothe stash house raided on October 12, 2006, the date alleged in the indictment. Because Lazos failed to move for a judgment of acquittal, we review his sufficiency argument to determine whether “the record is devoid of evidence pointing to guilt.” United States v. Delgado, 256 F.3d 264, 274 (5th Cir. 2001). “The prosecution is not required to prove the exact date [alleged in the indictment]; it suffices if a date reasonably near is established.” U nited States
v. Powers, 168 F.3d 741, 746 (5th Cir. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties, and we conclude that the record is not devoid of evidence supporting a conclusion that Lazos engaged in an alien-harboring conspiracy and harbored and encouraged illegal aliens. See Delgado, 256 F.3d at 274. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Redline/strikeout of MATS appropriate and necessary piece only Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 11/07/2011 01:09 PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Bryan Hubbell, Amy Lamson, Lydia Wegman, Teresa Clemons

Cortney --

Attached for your convenience is a redline/strikeout version of the MATS appropriate and necessary piece only. This compares the original version you received on October 17 with that which is in the complete package submitted last Friday.

The version sent over on Friday is the new "master" on which future comments/edits should be made.

Thank you.

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450

MATS A&N preamble 11.3.11 track changes.docx
#### Wolf v. Banks

DA 16-0633

05/30/17

2017 MT 132N

Affirmed

Dist. 18 (Gallatin)
#### Com. v. Lewis

10/23/2015

219 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 440
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Alvarez-Perez, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 233]—

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Marc J. Whiten, J.), entered on or about June 15, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*431Clear and convincing evidence supports the assessment of 20 points for the victim’s physical helplessness. The court properly assessed these points based on facts elicited in defendant’s plea allocution in the underlying case, which “shall be deemed established by clear and convincing evidence and shall not be relitigated” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]). In addition, the sentencing minutes, and evidence in the case summary, showed that part of the sexual contact occurred while the victim was not merely intoxicated, but was physically helpless within the meaning of Penal Law § 130.00 (7). The assessment of points for this factor while also assessing points for forcible compulsion was not inconsistent, because the victim’s account demonstrated both physical helplessness and forcible compulsion, at different times during the incident.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Andrias, Gische, Kern and Singh, JJ.
Order entered January 23, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00056-CV

IN RE MARCOS GONZALEZ, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-09623

ORDER

Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel

This original proceeding challenges a December 7, 2022 “Order on 

Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Compel Production of Defendant Marco Gonzalez’s 

Medical Records” signed in the 192nd District Court, Dallas County, Texas by the 

Honorable Kristina Williams, whose term expired on December 31, 2022. Also 

before the Court is relator’s January 19, 2023 “Motion for Temporary Relief 

Pending Mandamus.”

Relator’s motion for temporary relief is DENIED.

Rule 7.2(b) requires this Court to abate this proceeding to allow the 

successor judge to reconsider the challenged order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2(b) (“If 
the case is an original proceeding under Rule 52, the court must abate the 

proceeding to allow the successor to reconsider the original party’s decision.”). 

Accordingly, we ABATE this original proceeding pursuant to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 7.2(b). This case is removed from the Court’s active docket 

until further order of this Court to allow the successor judge to reconsider the 

December 7, 2022 ruling of the former judge of the 192nd District Court. We 

further ORDER the parties to file a status report with this Court within TEN 

DAYS of any ruling by the successor judge required by rule 7.2(b). 

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE