alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-5261.

#### Jeffrey Shawn Henderson, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 267,

178 L. Ed. 2d 176,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6847.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Calendar No. 544

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2218

A BILL

To provide authorization of appropriations for the

for fiscal years 1995 and 1996.Federal Emergency Food and Shelter Program

AUGUST 5, 1994

Reported without an amendment
II

Calendar No. 544

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2218

To provide authorization of appropriations for the Federal Emergency Food

and Shelter Program for fiscal years 1995 and 1996.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 21 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. GLENN (for himself and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AUGUST 5, 1994

Reported by Mr. GLENN, without an amendment

A BILL

To provide authorization of appropriations for the Federal

Emergency Food and Shelter Program for fiscal years

1995 and 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

4 Section 322 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

5 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11352) is amended to read as

6 follows:
2

•S 2218 RS

1 ‘‘SEC. 322. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out

3 this title $187,560,000 for each of fiscal years 1995 and

4 1996.’’.
Exhibit 31.1





Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Ronald S. McIntyre, certify that:





1.      I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Hyperview Ltd. (“Hyperview ”);





2.      Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the annual report;





3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of  Hyperview  as of, and for, the periods presented in the annual report;





4.      I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for Hyperview and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to Hyperview , including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of Hyperview disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in the annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.     Hyperview’s other certifying officers and I (same person) have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to Hyperview ’s auditors and the audit committee of Hyperview ’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect Hyperview ’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for Hyperview ’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Hyperview ’s internal controls; and





6.      I have indicated in the annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: October 21, 2010





s/  Ronald S. McIntyreName:
Ronald S. McIntyreTitle:
Chairman, President,Chief Executive andChief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
Order entered October 28 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00699
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF C.B. AND V.H., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Co urt

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC
- 18
- 00992
- X

ORDER Appellant’s brief in this termination of parental rights case is overdue. Because these types of cases must be handled expeditiously, appellant is ORDERED to file appellant’s brief withi n FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order . F ailure to file the brief by the time specified may result in an order for the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed and to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, including appointment of new counsel.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
#### John Jones et al., Appellants, v K&C Limousines of New York, LLC, et al., Defendants, and Adam R. Johnson, Respondent.

[53 NYS3d 273]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), *639entered April 25, 2016, which granted defendant Adam Johnson’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and any cross claims against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant Johnson made a prima facie showing of his lack of negligence, by submitting evidence that the limousine driven by defendant Cara Elliot rear-ended the limousine driven by Johnson after Johnson’s vehicle came to an abrupt stop *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 [a]; *Maisonet v Roman,*139 AD3d 121, 123 [1st Dept 2016], *appeal dismissed*27 NY3d 1062 [2016]; *Morgan v Browner,*138 AD3d 560, 560 [1st Dept 2016]).

In opposition, plaintiffs, who were passengers in the limousines, failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The affidavits submitted by plaintiffs were insufficient to raise an issue of fact, as they contradicted the affiants’ deposition testimony *(see Peralta-Santos v 350 W. 49th St. Corp.,*139 AD3d 536, 537 [1st Dept 2016]). Moreover, defendant Elliot did not offer a non-negligent explanation for rear-ending Johnson’s limousine *(see Morgan,*138 AD3d at 560). Rather, she admitted that the collision occurred almost immediately after seeing Johnson’s brake lights activate.

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.R, Richter, Feinman, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.
#### Com. v. Williams

03/29/2016

616 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 95
Exhibit
15.2







Elbit
Imaging

7
Mota Gur, Olympia C Tower, Petach Tikva, Israel



Securities
and Exchange Commission

100
F Street, NE

Washington,
D.C. 20549



Ladies
and Gentlemen:



The
firm Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co. was previously the independent registered public accounting firm for Elbit Imaging Ltd.
(the “Company”), and reported on the financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31,
2015 and 2014. We have read the Company’s statements included under Item 16F (the “Item”) of its Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, and agree with the statements made by the Company under
this Item.



|/s/
    Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.         | 
|--------------------------------------------- | 
|Brightman
    Almagor Zohar & Co.             | 
|Certified
    Public Accountants              | 
|A
    member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu | 
|                                              | 
|Tel-Aviv,
    Israel                          | 
|November
    9, 2017                          |
# DLA Distribution delivers Tyvek protective suits to Army units in Europe

/ Published May 6, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Army units throughout Europe are receiving Tyvek protective suits to be worn by employees disinfecting facilities and equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

                A distribution process worker at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Europe’s Theater Consolidation and Shipping Point in Germersheim, Germany, prepares pallets of Tyvek protection suits for loading onto commercial trucks. The suits are expected to arrive at unit locations throughout Europe May 8-29.                            DLA Distribution delivers Tyvek protective suits to Army units in Europe                            A distribution process worker at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Europe’s Theater Consolidation and Shipping Point in Germersheim, Germany, prepares pallets of Tyvek protection suits for loading onto commercial trucks. The suits are expected to arrive at unit locations throughout Europe May 8-29.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Distribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 200428-D-D0441-0001

Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support and DLA Distribution Europe arranged shipment of 14 pallets of Tyvek suits to DLA Distribution Europe’s Theater Consolidation and Shipping Point in Germersheim, Germany. The suits will be delivered by commercial trucks to troops in Italy, Germany, Belgium, Romania and Poland May 8-29.

“It is very rewarding to be the last stop in the supply chain, interacting, in most cases, directly with the customer. This has never been more evident than right now as we provide mission-critical supplies and personal protective equipment in direct support of the COVID-19 response,” said DDDE Commander Army Lt. Col. Jonathan S. Ackiss.

Cleaning and disinfecting is an important part of reopening public spaces, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Other supplies provided by DDDE include food and Red Cross comfort packs to boost warfighter morale.
No. 09-1255.

#### Patricia Limmer, Billye Joyce Smith, and Bobby Jean Nothnagel, Petitioners v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, dba Union Pacific Railroad Company.

562 U.S. 829, 131 S. Ct. 75,

178 L. Ed. 2d 25,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6228.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas denied.

Same case below, 299 S.W.3d 78.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Dennis J. Stevermer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: December 13, 2004/s/ DENNIS J. STEVERMERDennis J. StevermerChief Financial Officer
No. 09-11093.

#### Douglas Alexander Brown, Petitioner v. Derral G. Adams, Warden.

562 U.S. 861, 131 S. Ct. 139,

178 L. Ed. 2d 84,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6100.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSREQUIRED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

Solely for the purposes ofcomplying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, the undersigned President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Pierre Foods, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, basedon my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarter ended December 3, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Norbert E. Woodhams |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Norbert E. Woodhams     |
| January 17, 2006        |

 

 

Solely for the purposes ofcomplying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Financial Officerof Pierre Foods, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge,that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedDecember 3, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Joseph W. Meyers |   |
|----------------------|--------|
| Joseph W. Meyers     |
| January 17, 2006     |

 

1

----
# Paolo Pappalardo, warehouse supervisor at DLA Distribution Sigonella, Italy, awarded the Jerri L. Taylor Award for Individual Outstanding Contributions

/ Published Nov. 6, 2020
DLA Distribution Public Affairs, 
Paolo Pappalardo, warehouse supervisor at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Sigonella, Italy, is awarded the Jerri L. Taylor Award for Outstanding Individual Contributions.

Pappalardo’s leadership was the driving force behind the success of the DDSI warehousing division. His positive attitude and rapport within all levels of the organization was instrumental in elevating the unit cohesiveness of DDSI.

Considered the most influential and technically knowledgeable, Pappalardo built a reliable and unified team of employees that he kept focused on superior performance and quality of work. Their focus was so sharp they processed over 34,000 material release orders, more than 11,000 stows and over 4,000 re-warehousing actions without a single error.

Not enough to just accomplish the task at hand with complete success, Pappalardo also ensured the overall culture of the workplace was healthy and thriving.

During Exercise Trident Juncture 19 Pappalardo led his team to process 500 line items to 10 different customers and would ship over 5 million pounds of material.

Pappalardo exemplifies continuous process improvement with focused attention to improving operations through cost avoidance and constant improvements to the workplace environment. Improvements led by Pappalardo resulted in denial rates reduced to zero, an amazing achievement demonstrating a warfighter always mentality. His open-minded approach to labor and management relations drove excellence in production, timeliness and meeting requirements of warfighter support.

Pappalardo’s work ethic, can do attitude, and positive work culture focused leadership are the exact qualities DLA Distribution needs, and our warfighters require. His actions are a great reflection upon himself and DLA Distribution as a whole.
ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2011 FED App. 0013P (6th Cir.)

File Name: 11b0013p.06

BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

In re: JENNY FOSTER and REESE FOSTER, )

)

Debtors. )

_____________________________________ )

)

)

SUSAN RHIEL, TRUSTEE, )

)

Appellant, ) No. 11-8023

)

v. )

)

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, )

)

Appellee. )

 )

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court

for the Southern District of Ohio

Case No. 09-63067; Adversary Case No. 10-2016

Decided and Filed: November 10, 2011

Before: HARRIS, RHODES, and SHEA-STONUM, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.

____________________

COUNSEL

ON BRIEF: Susan L. Rhiel, RHIEL & ASSOCIATES CO., LPA, Columbus, Ohio, for

Appellant. Amelia A. Bower, PLUNKETT COONEY, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellee. 

____________________

OPINION

____________________

ARTHUR I. HARRIS, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge. After reviewing the record and

the parties’ briefs, the Panel determines that the bankruptcy court did not err in granting summary
-2-

judgment against the trustee and in favor of BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP. We therefore affirm

for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court’s well-written opinion entered on March 23, 2011,

Rhiel v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, (In re Foster), 448 B.R. 914 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2011), and

for the reasons stated in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s opinion entered on June 24, 2011, Rogan

v. Fifth Third Mortgage Co., (In re Rowe), 452 B.R. 591 (B.A.P. 6th Cir. 2011) (analyzing a similar

issue under Kentucky law).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

QUIN HARRY MARTIN

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 175 DB 2017 (No. 2 RST 2018)

Attorney Registration No. 60102

(Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of February, 2018, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated January 24, 2018, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that Quin Harry Martin, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
# FedMall offers COVID-19 protective equipment to small businesses, state and local agencies to follow mid-July

/ Published June 30, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency is making it easier for small businesses to purchase non-medical personal protective equipment to use while performing government contracts.

The new COVID-19 Contingency Corridor in FedMall, Defense Department’s e-commerce platform, allows small business contractors to buy items like non-medical masks and gloves, hand sanitizer, disinfectant wipes, temperature sensors and Plexi-glass shields. As of June 22, the corridor offered over 200 items through nine vendor catalogs.

Small businesses represent a critical component of the defense industrial base, said Dwight Deneal, director of DLA’s Office of Small Business Programs, adding that the agency is working with DOD officials and industry associations to help ensure the safety of those who provide critical warfighter support. 

“This capability will support reconstitution of our contractor workforce, including small businesses that have had difficulties purchasing sufficient quantities of non-medical personal protective equipment for their employees,” Deneal said.

The agency is reviewing catalogs of another 20 suppliers and helping them complete FedMall registration through local Procurement Technical Assistance Centers that provide free training and counseling to small businesses.

DLA officials are also finalizing plans to open the corridor to state and local government agencies by mid-July. Federal law allows such agencies to buy most equipment that DOD uses for its own purposes that is suitable for use in counter-drug, homeland security and emergency response activities. Over 30 state law enforcement agencies and over 300 state and local firefighting agencies are already enrolled in FedMall.

To use the corridor, state and local government agencies will need DOD-issued External Certificate Authority, similar to the certificate authority of Common Access Cards. ECAs require background checks and can take two to three weeks to obtain. State and local government agencies must also pay the ECA issuing cost, which is $380 for a three-year subscription.

DLA is monitoring purchases from small businesses and other federal agencies to ensure DOD orders aren’t impacted. FedMall system controls prevent state and local users from buying military-grade equipment.

FedMall has been a key part of DLA’s COVID-19 response, and customers have ordered over $14 million in pandemic-related supplies through the platform since mid-March. Face masks, cleaning supplies, and Meals, Ready to Eat have been among the most popular items, with face masks accounting for over one-third of all COVID-19 purchases.

In fiscal 2019, 40,000 active users – 70% U.S. military – purchased $312 million in supplies from FedMall. Of the 900 commercial suppliers registered to sell products via FedMall, 70% were small businesses.