alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dowling v. Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute

04/05/2016

706 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1126
# DLA seeks global supply chain solutions at R&D Industry Collider Day

/ Published Sept. 19, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency Research and Development team brought together experts from government, industry and academia for the third annual Industry Collider Day Sept. 8. Over 600 registrants attended the six-hour virtual event to explore solutions that optimize and safeguard global supply chains.

DLA R&D Operations Integrator Martina Johnson told attendees they would gain a concrete understanding of what DLA does and how they can collaborate with the agency.

“We need your talents, your fresh ideas and your innovative solutions,” Johnson said. “DLA can’t transform and modernize without your support.”

DLA Chief Information Officer George Duchak reflected on previous partnerships formed at ICD that impacted DLA in meaningful, positive ways. He challenged attendees to build on that success.

“There’s always room at the table for creative, agile companies and organizations when we have a singular goal in mind: to serve the nation and America’s warfighters,” Duchak said.

He also noted that DLA R&D plays a critical role in safeguarding the agency’s supply chains.

“Our commercial sector and defense sector supply chains are inextricably linked,” Duchak said. “The Defense Department depends on the commercial sector’s supply chain resilience. Disruptions compromise our nation’s ability to deliver combat power and execute critical missions.”

Duchak highlighted DLA R&D’s role in providing real-time COVID-19 solutions for personal protective equipment, face shields and rapid test kits. He described how DLA supported an industry partner to fast-track a breakthrough rapid test that delivers results in under 20 minutes. It gained the Food and Drug Administration’s emergency-use authorization in February.

“The DOD depends on the commercial sector for pretty much all that we build and consume,” Duchak said. “Our innovations are putting together these available commercial inventions, components, and products in new and different ways to solve our warfighting needs.”

Interactive sessions sparked conversations between practitioners and researchers regarding greening, sustainability and strategic materials. Attendees also discussed supply chain resiliency, security and management.

The event concluded with the awarding of nine small business contracts in response to solicitations DLA issued in the previous weeks for research and development proposals on several technology domains. The solicitations, known as broad agency announcements, included detailed problem statements and challenges DLA faces. The contracts awarded at ICD are valued at $1 million.
#### Eagle Cr. Land Resources, LLC, Matter of (Woodstone Lake Dev., LLC)

3d Dept: 149 AD3d 1324

denied
#### Sitomer v Goldweber Epstein, LLP

1st Dept: 139 AD3d 642

denied
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, James H. Moore, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Mines Management, Inc. (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 11, 2005

/s/ James H. Moore

_________________________________

James H. Moore

Chief Financial Officer



---
No. 10-5239.

#### Jose O. Rivera, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 910, 131 S. Ct. 264,

178 L. Ed. 2d 174,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7385.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 958.
2017-0494.

#### State ex rel. Walker v. Yount.

In Mandamus. On S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 determination. Cause dismissed. On relator’s motion to expedite proceedings. Motion denied as moot.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 12MERCK & CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESComputation Of Ratios Of Earnings To Fixed Charges($ in millions except ratio data)                           Nine Months      Ended      Sept. 30,  Years Ended December 31,   2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001 Income from Continuing OperationsBefore Taxes $5,309.5  $7,363.9  $7,974.5  $9,051.6  $9,651.7  $9,948.1  Add (Subtract):                        One-third of rents  49.3   68.2   71.9   75.6   67.2   64.2 Interest expense, gross  277.8   385.5   293.7   350.9   390.6   463.7 Interest capitalized,net of amortization  22.7   (1.0)  (21.3)  (30.1)  (36.9)  (66.1)Equity (income) loss from affiliates,net of distributions  (337.7)  (615.9)  (421.2)  79.2   (156.1)  (113.7)Preferred stock dividends, net of tax  89.8   120.0   151.0   150.9   164.3   199.6                    Earnings from Continuing Operations $5,411.4  $7,320.7  $8,048.6  $9,678.1  $10,080.8  $10,495.8                                             One-third of rents $49.3  $68.2  $71.9  $75.6  $67.2  $64.2 Interest expense, gross  277.8   385.5   293.7   350.9   390.6   463.7 Preferred stock dividends  122.3   166.7   207.1   215.6   234.7   285.1                    Fixed Charges from ContinuingOperations $449.4  $620.4  $572.7  $642.1  $692.5  $813.0                                             Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Chargesfrom Continuing Operations  12   12   14   15   15   13                    For purposes of computing these ratios, “earnings” consist of income from continuing operationsbefore taxes, one-third of rents (deemed by the Company to be representative of the interest factorinherent in rents), interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, equity (income) loss fromaffiliates, net of distributions, and dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary companies. “Fixedcharges” consist of one-third of rents, interest expense as reported in the Company’s consolidatedfinancial statements and dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary companies.
No. 09-11417.

#### Jimiyu Vernon, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 879, 131 S. Ct. 194,

178 L. Ed. 2d 117,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6498.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-50094

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTHA ELENA DE LA ROSA-VALENZUELA,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-97-CR-151-1

_________________________________________________________________

December 31, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Martha Elena De La Rosa-Valenzuela appeals from the district

court’s denial of her motion to suppress the marijuana seized from

her vehicle. She argues that a Border Patrol agent’s tapping of

her vehicle’s gas tank constituted a search under the Fourth

Amendment and that such search was illegal because it was without

consent or probable cause. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. See United States v. Muniz-Melchor, 894 F.2d

1430, 1435-37 (5th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, the judgment of the

district court is
2

A F F I R M E D.
No. 10-5461.

#### Minako Wong, Petitioner v. Jose R. San Martin, et al.

562 U.S. 923, 131 S. Ct. 303,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7383.

178 L. Ed. 2d 197,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, denied.
No. 10-5326.

#### Joseph Jamene Moore, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 915, 131 S. Ct. 277,

178 L. Ed. 2d 183,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7027,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 269.
# Third quarter employees of the quarter

/ Published Oct. 24, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Energy is proud to announce the third quarter, fiscal year 2022 military, civilian and strategic goals employees of the quarter. 

These members went on to compete in the DLA-wide third quarter Military and Employee Recognition Program. 

**Field Grade Officer Category:**

Navy Cmdr. Joshua Fischer, DLA Energy Europe and Africa. As the Director of Supplier Operations, he supported 59 Defense Fuel Support Point’s in the U.S. European Command region where the fuel requirements are the highest demand levels seen in over 30 years. He and his team managed the acquisition and assignment of a second dedicated tanker to support the increased demand, a 40% increase in on hand inventory, and a 33% increase in fuel sales over the last two quarters.

**Company Grade Officer Category:**

Air Force Capt. Akeem Parks, DLA Energy Middle East. For an entire month, during a 66% workforce shortage, Parks served dual roles as Acting Chief of Customer Operations and Petroleum Operations Officer. He guided a diverse team of 14 joint military and civilians in three geographical locations and facilitated seven successful proof of principle contracts totaling 155,000 gallons of diesel and jet fuel valued at $687,000.

Parks also won Company Grade Officer Category across the DLA enterprise.

**Category B Civilian (GS/WG/WL 7-12):**

Walter Hegan, DLA Energy Europe and Africa. Hegan is an operations management specialist who led the joint Operations Center for DLA Energy Europe and Africa during Ukraine crisis coordinating delivery of 5.4 million gallons of fuel to support critical theatre operations. He also developed fuel concepts of support for six major exercises in Europe and Africa. 

Hegan also won Category B across the DLA enterprise.

**Category C Civilian (GS13-15/WS):**

Carly Dubernas, DLA Energy Supplier Operation Directorate. Dubernas is the contracting officer for the privatized Electric/Water and Natural Gas utility services contracts at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, which has seen a massive rebuilding since effort since Hurricane Michael in October 2018. During third quarter of fiscal 2022, her efforts culminated with the award of numerous rebuilding projects including new state-of-the-art Switching Stations and a 1-million-gallon water storage tank.

Dubernas also won Category C across the DLA enterprise.

DLA Director's Strategic Goals Award Category:

**Individual Award:**

Connie Braesch, DLA Energy Commander’s Action Group Public Affairs for support of people and culture. 

**Team Award:**

DLA Energy Europe & Africa, Supplier Operations Branch for fiscal stewardship and auditability. 

Navy Cmdr. Joshua Fischer, Lysia Valladares-Pena, Ryan Lee, Travis Streeter, Marlowe Grimsley, Chris Diaz, Bobby Singleton, Toka Trau-Massey, Jaime Guevara, Hauke Dins, Lucien Megel, Wolfgang Leis, Ece Karayel-Uzun, Manfred Hildmann, Gunther Von Dungen and Albertine Iloba.
# Search and rescue teams train on disposed helicopters

/ Published July 9, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich, 
A select group of search and rescue medics proved that “practice makes perfect” still applies to training. The medics made use of demilitarized CH-46 helicopters to practice SAR techniques creating a realistic training experience.

                Search and rescue medics train on firefighter tactics during a recent session making use of the CH-46 hull.                            Search and rescue medic training                            Search and rescue medics train on firefighter tactics during a recent session making use of the CH-46 hull.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 070721-D-AU600-502The two CH-46 Sea Knights were processed for disposal, as the platform is reaching the end of its service life, for use as training aides before eventually being turned into scrap.

A stringent process takes place to ensure the CH-46s are disposed of properly. This includes stripping all sensitive and usable components and draining all hazardous fluids before shipping to DLA’s Disposition Services’ disposal yard.

“The Air Wing is able to utilize the hulls for SAR medics to train on specialized passenger extraction and firefighting,” said Bert Hall an aviation maintenance advisor with the Department of State.

                Search and rescue medics simulate moving patients out of the wreckage from a crash scene.                            Search and rescue medics train                            Search and rescue medics simulate moving patients out of the wreckage from a crash scene.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 070721-D-AU600-501For medics, they never know when training could be the difference between life and death.

“When that aircraft goes down, they do everything,” Hall said. “They will do anything and everything associated with extracting [the crew] and getting them to safety. So that is firefighting, that is medical attention, and that is potentially ground protection.”

In the absence of actual helicopters, sea-land containers are used as an alternate method for training. An outline of the aircraft is made on the container, allowing personnel to make specific extraction cut points simulating a realistic emergency extraction scenario. This is an effective substitute when actual hulls are not available.

“The crash rescue extraction training on the 46 hulls is spot on,” said SAR Technician Lead Christopher Roberts recently participated in SAR medic training that made use of the CH-46 hulls. “Great experience for all involved and allows others to see what we actually do to prepare for the real-world event, God forbid, that day should materialize.”

The DOS is phasing out CH-46s from its inventory and replacing them with HH-60 Blackhawks. While several of the helicopters are still in use, the DOS is looking at alternate disposal methods if and when additional CH-46’s become due for demilitarization.
No. 10-5644.

#### Glenn Dell Cook, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 933, 131 S. Ct. 331,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7618.

178 L. Ed. 2d 215,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 599 F.3d 1208.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 30, 2016

a1121 

# Order

Clerk November 30, 2016

152826

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152826

COA: 329582

Calhoun CC: 03

- 003376

- FC

SHAWN ANTHONY YOUNG,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 5, 2015

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use the defendant’s

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Exhibit 31.3I, Kerril Steele, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harrington West FinancialGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: (d) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (e) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (f) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date:May 10, 2007               /s/ KERRIL STEELE   Kerril Steele   Sr. Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer
No. 10-5325.

#### John Bolden, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 915, 131 S. Ct. 277,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7046.

178 L. Ed. 2d 183,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 596 F.3d 976.
CHRISTOPHER CURTIS 

SCULL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-1639

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Linda L. Nobles, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 09-10795.

#### Jerry Hardwick, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 852, 131 S. Ct. 111,

178 L. Ed. 2d 68,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6415.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 16 So. 3d 1045.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2234 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2234

To amend the Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission Act of 1989 to 
     extend the term of the commission established under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 23 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

  Mr. Breaux (for himself, Mr. Johnston, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Bumpers, Mr. 
    Durenberger, Mr. Sasser, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mr. Simon, and Mr. 
   Feingold) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission Act of 1989 to 
     extend the term of the commission established under that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TERM OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORRIDOR STUDY 
              COMMISSION.

    Section 9(b) of the Mississippi River Corridor Study Commission Act 
of 1989 (Public Law 101-398; 104 Stat. 859) is amended by striking out 
``3 years after the date of the first meeting of the Commission,'' and 
inserting in lieu thereof ``June 30, 1996,''.

                                 <all>
```