alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10-5457.

#### Rickey Calhoun, Petitioner v. Henry Richards.

562 U.S. 923, 131 S. Ct. 302,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7364.

178 L. Ed. 2d 196,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5277.

#### Nathaniel J. Hudson, Petitioner v. Kenneth McKee, Warden; and Jerome Dowe, Petitioner v. Gerald Hofbauer, Warden.

562 U.S. 913, 131 S. Ct. 270,

178 L. Ed. 2d 178,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6825.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### Vosburg, III v. NBC Seventh Realty Corp. 40

04/12/2016

756 MAL (2015)

40

. Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 393
No. 09-11529.

#### Julio Eliezer Ortiz, Sr., Petitioner v. Jeffrey A. Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 886, 131 S. Ct. 216,

178 L. Ed. 2d 130,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7013,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anonymous, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 294]

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ethan Green-berg, J.), rendered July 22, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second drug felony offender, to an aggregate term of three to six years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant received ample opportunity to make a motion to withdraw his pleas, in a process that extended over many adjournments, in which defendant received the advice of several successive attorneys. The record, as a whole, does not support the conclusion that the court coerced defendant into deciding not to proceed with such a motion. Furthermore, at a time when it was unclear whether defendant still wished to withdraw his pleas, defendant’s ultimate counsel did not take a position adverse to his client by making a simple and accurate statement that a plea withdrawal motion had little chance of success; accordingly, unlike the situation of an actual conflict *(see e.g. People v Mitchell,*21 NY3d 964 [2013]), the court was not obligated to relieve this attorney sua sponte.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1558]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 United States Code Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of 
the following meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: February 11, 1998.
    Time: 1 pm to adjournment.
    Place: 6120 Executive Blvd., Rockville MD 20892, (telephone 
conference call)/
    Contact Person: Melissa J. Stick, Ph.D., M.P.H., Scientific 
Review Administrator, NIDCD/DEA/SRB, EPS Room 400C, 6120 Executive 
Boulevard, MSC 7180, Bethesda MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: March 3, 1998.
    Time: 4 pm to adjournment.
    Place: 6120 Executive Blvd., Rockville MD 20892 (telephone 
conference call).
    Contact Person: Richard S. Fisher, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIDCD/DEA/SRB, EPS Room 400C, 6120 Executive 
Boulevard, MSC 7180, Bethesda MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, United 
States Code. The applications and/or proposals and the discussion 
could reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial property such 
as patentable material and personal information concerning 
individuals associated with the applications and/or proposals, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion 
of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.173 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders)

    Dated: January 15, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-1558 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
2017-0292.

#### State v. Moore.

Stark App. No. 2016CA00211, 2017-Ohio-602.
Untitled Document



EXHIBIT
10(iii)(A) 6 


FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. 2004 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
FOR
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 



WHEREAS,
Section 11 of the Lucent Technologies Inc. 2004 Equity  Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (the “Non-Employee  Director Plan”) provides that the
Board of Directors of Lucent  Technologies Inc. (the “Board”) may amend the
Non-Employee Director  Plan from time to time;
 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to the recommendation of the Leadership Development  and Compensation Committee
of the Board, the Board approved on July 16,  2004 (the “Approval”) that the
Non-Employee Director Plan be amended as  set forth hereunder (the “Amendment”);
and
 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to the Approval, the Board authorized the Secretary  of the Company to execute
the Amendment to the Non-Employee Director  Plan.
 


NOW, THEREFORE,
IT IS RESOLVED that the Non-Employee Director Plan is  amended as follows:
 


1. Section
3(h)(iii) of the Non-Employee Director Plan, “Definitions — Change in Control”,
is amended by deleting the first clause through and  including the first semicolon, which
text is provided below under the  caption “Original Clause” and replacing such
clause with the text  provided below under the caption “As amended in this First
Amendment”:
 


Original
Clause 


	 	     “(iii)
The approval by the shareowners of the  Company of a merger, reorganization or
consolidation  or sale or other disposition of all or substantially  all of the assets of
the Company (each, a “Corporate  Transaction”) or, if consummation of such
Corporate  Transaction is subject, at the time of such approval  by shareowners, to the
consent of any government or  governmental agency, the obtaining of such consent  (either
explicitly or implicitly by consummation);  .  . . ”
 






As amended in
this First Amendment 


	 	     “(iii)
The consummation of a merger,  reorganization or consolidation or sale or other
disposition of all or substantially all of the assets  of the Company (each, a “Corporate
Transaction”);  . .  .”
 














Capitalized
terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the  meanings assigned to such
terms in the Non-Employee Director Plan.
 


Except as
modified herein, the Non-Employee Director Plan shall  continue in full force and effect
in accordance with its terms.
 



	Signature:	/s/ William R. Carapezzi, Jr.	 
	 	William R. Carapezzi, Jr.
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary	 











Dated:  As of
July 16, 2004.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory A. Serrao,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, of American Dental Partners, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2007 which this certification accompanies fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) Information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ GREGORY A. SERRAO                                             
|Gregory A. Serrao, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|March 10, 2008
No. 09-11387.

#### Elton Gregg Woodard, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 877, 131 S. Ct. 190,

178 L. Ed. 2d 114,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6863,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### North v Air Liquid Sys. Corp.

1st Dept: 142 AD3d 408

denied
#### Com. v. Ivy

05/10/2016

14 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 656
#### Com. v. Weaver 31

02/22/2016

881 MAL (2015)

31

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter. Reconsideration Denied March 24, 2016.

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 442
No. 10-133.

#### Sami Chemicals and Extracts, Ltd., Petitioner v. David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office.

562 U.S. 895, 131 S. Ct. 319,

178 L. Ed. 2d 145,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6425.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 367 Fed. Appx. 150.
No. 09-1071.

#### Go Daddy Software, Inc., Petitioner v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

562 U.S. 827, 131 S. Ct. 68,

178 L. Ed. 2d 23,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6497.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 581 F.3d 951.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Damion Barnaby, Appellant.

[47 NYS3d 916]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (C. Quinn, J.), rendered March 13, 2014, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his general waiver of his right to appeal encompassed the denial, after a hearing in lieu of motions, of suppression of identification testimony *(see People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]). The defendant’s general waiver of his right to appeal was valid *(see People v Sanders,*25 NY3d 337, 342 [2015]; *People v Nicholson,*15 AD3d 237 [2005], *affd*6 NY3d 248 [2006]), and precludes appellate review of his challenges to the denial of suppression.

Rivera, J.P., Cohen, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.  By: /s/ Michael Feinsod Michael Feinsod President and Chief Executive Officer 
November 19, 2008
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TEUANA CROSS and ANGELA PETERSON
, Appellant s ,

v.

THE BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2431

[ November 24, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; John B. Bowman , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 13

- 26810

.

Michael Hursey of Michael Hursey, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Angela L. Dawson of Angela L. Dawson, P.A., Plantation, fo r appellants.

Thomas W. Paradise

, Tommie Derpima , and Lauren Stone of Vernis & Bowling of Broward, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, K LINGENSMITH and A RTAU

, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16004]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Application for Discharge 
of Member or Survivor of Member of Group Certified to Have Performed 
Active Duty with the Armed Forces of the United States; DD Form 2168; 
OMB Number 0704-0100.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Number of Respondents: 3,000.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 3,000.
    Average Burden Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,500.
    Needs and Uses: This information collection requirement is 
necessary to implement 38 U.S.C. 106 (Pub. L. 95-202, Section 401), 
which directs the Secretary of Defense to determine if civilian 
employment or contractual service rendered by groups to the Armed 
Forces of the United States shall be considered active duty. This 
information is collected on DD Form 2168, ``Application for Discharge 
of Member or Survivor of Member of Group Certified to Have Performed 
Active Duty with the Armed Forces of the United States,'' which 
provides the necessary data to assist each of the Military Departments 
in determining if an applicant was a member of a group which has 
performed active military service. Those individuals who have been 
recognized as a member of an approved group are eligible for benefits 
provided for by laws administered by the Department of Veterans 
Affairs.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: June 10, 1998.
 Patricia L. Toppings,
 Alternate ODS Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-16004 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30222-30223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14831]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPP-00539; FRL-5795-5]

 State FIFRA Issues Research and Evaluation Group (SFIREG) Water 
Quality andPesticide Disposal Working Committee; Open Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State FIFRA Issues Research and Evaluation Group (SFIREG) 
Water Quality and Pesticide Disposal Working Committee will hold a 2-
day meeting, June 8 and 9, 1998. This notice announces the location and 
times for the meeting and sets forth the tentative agenda topics. The 
meetings are open to the public.

 DATES: The SFIREG Working Committee on Water Quality and Pesticide 
Disposal will meet on Monday, June 8, 1998, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. 
and Tuesday, June 9, 1998, from 8:30 a.m. to 12 noon .

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: The National Airport Doubletree 
Hotel, 300 Army Navy Drive, Arlington-Crystal City, VA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Elaine Y. Lyon, Field and 
External Affairs Division, Office of Pesticide Programs (7506C), 
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
Office location and telephone number: 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington-Crystal City, VA 22202, CM-II (703) 305-5306, (703) 308-1850 
(fax); e-mail: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The tentative agenda of the SFIREG Working 
Committee on Water Quality and Pesticide Disposal includes the 
following:
    1. Update on the State Management Plan.
    2. Status on triazine special review.
    3. Surface water issues.
    4. Aquatic herbicide issues.
    5. Follow-up on Total Maximum Daily Loads.
    6. Drinking water levels of concern.
    7. FQPA - Tolerance assessment impacts from water residues.
    8. Update on The Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment 
Methods.
    9. Update from the Office of Pesticide Programs.
    10. Update from the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance.
    11. Overview of GAO Hazardous Waste Report.
    12. Reports from Committee meetings.
    13. Other topics as appropriate

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection.

[[Page 30223]]

    Dated: June 1, 1998.

Jay Ellenbeger,
Director, Field and External Affairs Division, Office of Pesticide 
Programs.

[FR Doc. 98-14831 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
```
#### Young Man Lee et al., Appellants, v Juan Rodriguez et al., Respondents.

[55 NYS3d 167]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered April 21, 2016, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint alleging serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants demonstrated prima facie that plaintiffs suffered no serious injuries to any of their allegedly injured body parts by submitting the affirmed reports of an orthopedist and a neurologist who found no deficits in the relevant ranges of motion upon recent examination *(see Shinn v Catanzaro,*1 AD3d 195, 197 [1st Dept 2003]). They also submitted evidence that plaintiffs neither reported any injury to the police immediately after the motor vehicle accident nor sought any medical treatment shortly after the accident, indicating that their claimed injuries were not causally related to the accident *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 218 [2011]; *Rosa v Mejia,*95 AD3d 402, 404 [1st Dept 2012]).

*482In opposition, plaintiffs’ only admissible submissions were the affirmed reports of a doctor who found limitations in range of motion in the allegedly injured body parts on examination of plaintiffs some three years after the accident. Moreover, to the extent the doctor recited findings made by another doctor who purportedly examined plaintiffs three weeks and two months after the accident and referred to MRI reports not in the record, his reports are hearsay and therefore may not be relied upon to raise an issue of fact *(see Malupa v Oppong,*106 AD3d 538 [1st Dept 2013]). As the record is “devoid of any medical records, charts or bills to support [plaintiffs’] claim of having received treatment” after the accident *(Rosa v Mejia,*95 AD3d at 403), it shows no causal connection between the accident and plaintiffs’ claimed injuries (see *Camilo v Villa Livery Corp.,*118 AD3d 586 [1st Dept 2014]).

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Elbit Systems Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph Gaspar, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: March 13, 2009 |  |  |  |     |  |                                             
|                     |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    JOSEPH
GASPAR                        
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Joseph Gaspar                               
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)