alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                 SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN DENTAL PARTNERS, INC.

PDHC, Ltd., a Minnesota corporation
Texas Dental Partners, Inc., a Texas corporation
Northpark Dental Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
American Dental Partners of Louisiana, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
American Dental Partners of Pennsylvania, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
 company
American Dental Partners of Wisconsin, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Apple Park Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of Ohio, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Innovative Practice Concepts, Inc., an Arizona corporation
American Dental Professional Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
American Dental Partners of Virginia, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
American Dental Partners of Maryland, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
American Dental Partners of Alabama, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
American Dental Partners of California, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of Oklahoma, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
American Dental Partners of North Carolina, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
 company
American Dental Partners of New York, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
National Dental Alliance, Inc., a Delaware corporation
National Financial Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of Tennessee, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **STATEMENT
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**
 
 
 Pursuant
        to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Thomas
        Granville, Chief Executive Officerof Axion Power International, Inc (the
        "Company"), hereby certifies that:
 
 The
        Company's Form 10-KSB Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2004
        (the
        "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
  /s/
        Thoms
        Granville
  Thoms
          Granville
 Dated:
        June 16, 2005
No. 09-11270.

#### Daniel P. McKinney, Petitioner v. Ohio.

562 U.S. 871, 131 S. Ct. 171,

178 L. Ed. 2d 102,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6993.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Defiance County, denied.
No. 10-5402.

#### Lee Roy Garcia, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 919, 131 S. Ct. 291,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7615.

178 L. Ed. 2d 191,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 604 F.3d 186.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LEONEL HERNANDEZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00152-CR

Appeal from the

168thDistrict Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D03827)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter’s third request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until October 18, 2019. NO FURTHER REQUESTS 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WIL BE CONSIDERED

BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Rachel Simons, Official Court Reporter for the 168thDistrict

Court, for El Passo County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record for the above styled and 

numbered cause and forward the same to this Court on or before October 18, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18

th day of September 2019.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1
certification pursuant to 18 u.s.c. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of thesarbanes-oxley act of 2002
The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to my knowledgethat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification isprovided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or “filed” for anypurpose whatsoever.     Date:May 31, 2005 Name: /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton                 Sheldon C. Fenton   Title: Chief Executive Officer
28
No. 10-5401.

#### John Walter Temple, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 919, 131 S. Ct. 291,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7424.

178 L. Ed. 2d 190,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*191Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 668.
No. 10-5271.

#### Mario Escamilla, Petitioner v. Nebraska.

562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 269,

178 L. Ed. 2d 177,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7000.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
# Commander sees firsthand support DLA Aviation at San Diego provides to the warfighter

/ Published Sept. 8, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
Since taking over as Commander of Defense Logistics Agency Aviation in Richmond, Virginia at the end of June, Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler has made it a priority to see firsthand the support those Aviation employees based at sites outside of Richmond provide to the nation’s warfighters on a daily basis.  

That vow took him to DLA Aviation at San Diego Aug. 24 and 25. 

Tyler, who was accompanied on the trip by Navy Capt. Ronald Hoak, chief of DLA Aviation’s Customer Operations Directorate’s Navy Customer Facing Division, DLA Aviation Richmond, was able to meet and chat with employees as he toured the DLA Aviation spaces. Tyler also got a chance to present length of service and Aviation employee of the 2nd quarter awards. 

During the two-day visit, led by Navy Cmdr. Frederic Albesa, officer-in-charge, DLA Aviation at San Diego, Tyler toured the Navy F-18 fighter jet production line at Fleet Readiness Center Southwest Industrial Support Center on Naval Air Station North Island, California.  He met with Navy senior leaders across the FRC enterprise to discuss DLA support.

He also received several briefings while at FRCSW, including one detailing new milling machines and their abilities to perform various types of work in mere hours rather than several days or weeks, and a new process to paint aircraft canopies that reduces maintenance production repair time.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Harrison, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 436]

*1455Appeal from a judgment of Steuben County Court (Bradstreet, J.), entered April 29, 2002, convicting defendant after a nonjury trial of, inter alia, burglary in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a bench trial of, inter alia, burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30 [3]) and menacing in the second degree (§ 120.14 [1]). The conviction arose out of an incident in which defendant broke down the door of the apartment of his ex-girlfriend and assaulted her, threatening to kill her with a knife. Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the burglary conviction because it fails to establish that he entered or remained unlawfully in the dwelling. Defendant’s motion to dismiss was not “specifically directed” at that asserted deficiency in the proof *(People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; *see People v Hines,*97 NY2d 56, 62 [2001], *rearg denied*97 NY2d 678 [2001]). Further, defendant moved to dismiss only at the close of the People’s case, failing to renew his motion at the close of all the proof. “[A] defendant who presents evidence after a court has declined to grant a trial motion to dismiss made at the close of the People’s case waives subsequent review of that determination” *(Hines,*97 NY2d at 61; *see People v Welch,*307 AD2d 776, 778 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 625 [2003]; *People v Tutt,*305 AD2d 987, 988 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 588 [2003]). In any event, we conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to establish that defendant entered the apartment unlawfully *(see People v Plume,*306 AD2d 916, 917 [2003]; *People v Horn,*302 AD2d 975 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 539 [2003]; *People v Prober,*298 AD2d 966, 967 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 538 [2002]). The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]), and the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 5, 2016

p0928

Order 

Clerk

October 5, 2016

152886

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152886

COA: 329343

Kent CC: 13-011957-FC

DREW EVERTT GARNER, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 23, 2015 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Untitled Document




EXHIBIT
10(iii)(A) 3 


FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE
LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. 2003 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PROGRAM 



WHEREAS,
Section 13 of the Lucent Technologies Inc. 2003 Long Term  Incentive Plan  (the
“2003 Plan”) provides that the Board of Directors of Lucent  Technologies  Inc.
(the “Board”) may amend the 2003 Plan from time to time;
 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to the recommendation of the Leadership Development  and Compensation Committee
of the Board, the Board approved on July 16,  2004 (the “Approval”) that the
2003 Plan be amended as set forth  hereunder (the “Amendments”); and
 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to the Approval, the Board authorized the Secretary  of the Company to execute
the Amendments to the 2003 Plan.
 


NOW, THEREFORE,
IT IS RESOLVED that the 2003 Plan is amended as follows:
 


1. Section
2(f)(iii) of the 2003 Plan, “Definitions – Change in  Control”, is amended
by  deleting the first clause through and including the first semicolon,  which text is
provided below under the caption “Original Clause” and  replacing such clause
with the text provided below under the caption  “As amended in this First Amendment”:
 


Original
Clause 


	 	     “(iii)
The approval by the shareowners of the  Company of a merger, reorganization or
consolidation  or sale or other disposition of all or substantially  all of the assets of
the Company (each, a “Corporate  Transaction”) or, if consummation of such
Corporate  Transaction is subject, at the time of such approval  by shareowners, to the
consent of any government or  governmental agency, the obtaining of such consent  (either
explicitly or implicitly by consummation);  .  . . ”
 






As amended in
this First Amendment 


	 	     “(iii)
The consummation of a merger,  reorganization or consolidation or sale or other
disposition of all or substantially all of the assets  of the Company (each, a “Corporate
Transaction”); . .  .”
 







2. Section
11(a)(i) of the 2003 Plan, “Change in Control Provisions — Impact of Event”,
is amended by adding the following sentence to the  end of subparagraph (a)(i) thereof:
 


	 	“The
exercise period for all Awards, other than  Performance Awards, that become fully and
immediately  exercisable pursuant to this Section 11(a)(i) shall be  determined pursuant
to the terms of the Award  Agreement applicable to such Award.”
 














Capitalized
terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the  meanings assigned to such
terms in the 2003 Plan.
 


Except as
modified herein, the 2003 Plan shall continue in full force  and effect in accordance
with its terms.



	Signature:	/s/ William R. Carapezzi, Jr.	 
	 	William R. Carapezzi, Jr.
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary	 



    






Dated:  As of
July 16, 2004.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2434 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2434

To increase the amount authorized to be appropriated for assistance for 
 highway relocation regarding the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National 
           Military Park in Georgia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 13 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

   Mr. Nunn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To increase the amount authorized to be appropriated for assistance for 
 highway relocation regarding the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National 
           Military Park in Georgia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 1(c) of the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize and direct 
the National Park Service to assist the State of Georgia in relocating 
a highway affecting the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military 
Park in Georgia'', approved December 24, 1987 (101 Stat. 1442), is 
amended by striking out ``$30,000,000'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
``$45,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Com. v. Harris

05/03/2016

69 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 495
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2366 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2366

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the tax-exempt 
                status of Christa McAuliffe Fellowships.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 1994

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the tax-exempt 
                status of Christa McAuliffe Fellowships.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (relating to qualified scholarships) is amended by adding 
at the end thereof the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Christa McAuliffe Fellowships.--In the case of an individual 
who is a Christa McAuliffe Fellow (as defined in section 561(b) of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965) and is awarded a fellowship pursuant to 
section 561 of such Act, gross income shall not include any amount of 
such fellowship award--
            ``(1) which is expended for a project approved by the 
        Secretary of Education pursuant to section 563(b) of such Act, 
        and
            ``(2) which is not expended directly or indirectly for the 
        personal use or benefit of such individual.''.
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to amounts 
received on or after July 1, 1990, in taxable years ending on or after 
such date.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-11029.

#### Joel Rodriguez, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 859, 131 S. Ct. 133,

178 L. Ed. 2d 80,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5895.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Decided January 12, 2017

#### Cavetti, Matter of, v Proud

2d Dept: 139 AD3d 1054

denied
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.6

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         The undersigned hereby appoints J. Peter Ricketts as his agent and
attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form
10-K relating to the year ending September 29, 2000, and any amendments thereto,
required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Ameritrade
Holding Corporation.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the 13th day of December, 2000.



/s/ Robert T. Slezak
--------------------------
Robert T. Slezak, Director
No. 10-5379.

#### Jose Luis Arevalo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 918, 131 S. Ct. 286,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6865.

178 L. Ed. 2d 188,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 957.
No. 09-11140.

#### Mark Alan Lane, Petitioner v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.

562 U.S. 863, 131 S. Ct. 146,

178 L. Ed. 2d 88,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6722.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
# DLA Troop Support celebrates May retirees

/ Published June 2, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support held a civilian retirement ceremony in honor of Carlos J. Deno Jr., Steven J. Bollendorf, and Gary T. Pierce on May 31, 2023.  

“Today is not only about these civil servants with decades of service, but their families as well,” said DLA Troop Support Commander Brig. Gen. Eric P Shirley, who presided on the ceremony. “Each of these gentlemen have supported their nation’s service members around the world.” 

Deno started his 41-year career as a summer employee. He held various jobs such as mail clerk, cataloger, quality assurance specialist and packaging specialist before becoming a full-time Equal Employment Opportunity specialist in 1999.  

“Starting here as a student in the Stay in School Program, it was a joy to rise up in the ranks,” said Deno.” I told my mom a few months ago that I was going to retire. She replied, ‘I remember your first day in June 1981.’ I am going to miss a lot of the people here.” 

During his retirement years, Deno plans to relax and enjoy time with his family, granddaughters, and friends.  

Bollendorf concludes his time at DLA after 39 years of service. For the last 17 years, he served as Division Chief for the medical/surgical prime vendor. A major highlight of his career came while working in the Clothing and Textile supply chain. He was instrumental in the purchase of 1,000 bullet proof vests for troops facing sniper fire in Somalia during the 1993 raid in Mogadishu as portrayed in “Black Hawk Down”. 

“I want to thank DLA Troop Support, and the government for providing the many challenging assignments and meaningful work I’ve had over the years,” said Bollendorf. “It has been easy finding reasons to serve our troops. Thank you to my family for being here today with the lifetime of love, support, and encouragement.” 

Bollendorf plans to enjoy the finer things in his life: travel, golf, and the beach. 

Pierce, the final retiree, departs Troop Support with 33 years of service. Since June 2009, Pierce has held the position of Occupational Safety and Health Specialist for DLA. During that time, he conducted over 700 safety inspections, and 130 employee reports of unsafe and unhealthy working conditions. 

“When I first started with the government, I had no plans on staying,” said Pierce. One of the reasons I stayed was my coworkers. It has been a pleasure working for the government and you all; so, thank you.” 

Pierce plans on working on his victory garden, home beer brewing, photography and enjoying time with family.  

“These gentlemen make 113-years of total service,” said Shirley. “A century of service—a century of support to the warfighter around the globe. You will always be a part of the Troop Support family.”
2017-0470.

#### Skindell v. Madigan.

Cuyahoga App. No. 103976, 2017-Ohio-398. Reported at 151 Ohio St.3d 1426, 2017-Ohio-8371, 84 N.E.3d 1064. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., dissent.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
Structure  ‐ Sanitized
Exhibit 23.1




March 20, 2006


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
                         ------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April
12, 2005 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Newave, Inc., Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2004, and to the reference to our Firm under the
heading "Experts" in this Registration Statement.




/s/ Michael Johnson & Co., LLC
Michael Johnson & Co., LLC
Denver, Colorado
No. 09-11135.

#### LaQuane A. Keith, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 863, 131 S. Ct. 146,

178 L. Ed. 2d 87,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6583.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2120

To amend and extend the authorization of appropriations for public

broadcasting, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 17 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Mr. INOUYE (for himself, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. KERRY, Mr.

PACKWOOD, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. MATHEWS, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BINGAMAN,

Mr. DODD, Mr. DURENBERGER, Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. LEVIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr.

REID, and Mr. WOFFORD) introduced the following bill; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend and extend the authorization of appropriations

for public broadcasting, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Broadcasting

5 Act of 1994’’.
2

S 2120 IS

1 SEC. 2. CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING AU2 THORIZATION.

3 Section 396(k)(1)(C) of the Communications Act of

4 1934 (47 U.S.C. 396(k)(1)(C)) is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘and 1993’’ and inserting in lieu

6 thereof ‘‘1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and

7 1999’’;

8 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘fiscal year 1995,’’;

9 and

10 (3) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 1996’’ and inserting

11 in lieu thereof ‘‘each of the fiscal years 1996, 1997,

12 1998, and 1999’’.

Æ