alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 242

EX PA R TE JER R Y LE E E V A N S A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 8 6 - 9 2 0 4 8 - L I N T HE CRI M I NAL DI S TR I CT COURT NUM BE R F I VE FROM DALLAS CO UNTY
P e r c u r ia m . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated sexual assault and sente nced to life imprisonment. The FifthCourt of Ap p ea l s af fi rm ed his conviction. Ev an s v . S

tate , No. 05-87-00192- CR (Tex. App–Dallas, delivere d Dec ember 28, 1987, no pet .). Applicant contends that, based upon newly discovere d evidenc e, he is ac tually innocent of th e o ff en s e i nth i s cau s e . S p ec i fi ca l l y , th e A p p l i ca n tco n t en d s th atp o s t - co n v i ct i o nDN A t es t i n g, wh ic h w a s n ot a

va ila ble at th e tim e of

tr ia l, r e fl e c ts t

hat he is a c tua lly

inn oc e nt.2

Th e tr ial court

ha s e nte re d f

ind ing s o f f

a c t and c on c lus ion s o f l aw, ba se d u po n D NAte st results it has rec eived, that the Applicant ha s been e liminated as the contributor of the sperm f

rac tion found in the vagina l swab taken afte r t he sex ual assault
. The trial court conc ludes that Applicant ha s pr ov e d b y

c le ar a nd convin c inge vid e nc e that a jur y wo uld a c qu it h im b a se d o n th is n e wl y dis c ov e re d e vid e nc e and

wo uld find th at he is n ot guil ty of thi s o ff e ns e . We a g re e . App lic ant i s entitled to relief. Ex parte Tuley , 10 9 S. W.3 d 3 88 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 02 ); Ex parte Elizondo , 947 S.W .2d 202 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Relief is g rante d. The judg ment in Cause No. 86-92048-L in the Criminal District Court Number Five of Dallas County is set aside, and A

pplicant is remande d to the custody of the Sherif

f of Da lla s County

to a ns we r t he c ha rg e a g a ins t him
. Copies of this opinion s hall be sent to the Te x as De partment o f Crim in a l Ju s ti c e
– Co r

rec tional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 21, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000068622
<NAME> U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              94                      94
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,533                   1,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        124                     124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,024                   2,024
<PP&E>                                          31,936                  31,936
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,204                  18,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,515                  16,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,510                   3,510
<BONDS>                                          5,375                   5,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         7,603                   7,603
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,617)                 (3,617)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,515                  16,515
<SALES>                                          2,456                   7,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,456                   7,304
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,867                   5,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 104                     308
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    477                   1,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                       183                     574
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                294                     926
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                      34
<NET-INCOME>                                       294                     960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
# U.S. Army to mark 247th Birthday June 14

/ Published June 10, 2022
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
June 14 not only hails as Flag Day but also is the birthday of America’s first militia, the U.S. Army. This year the Army celebrates it’s 247th Birthday.

According to U.S. Army history reports, on June 14, 1775, the Second Continental Congress authorized the formation of 10 companies from Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia to march to Boston to support the war against England for independence and put it under the command of General George Washington a few days later on June 19, 1775.

This army was known as the Army of the United Colonies until its name was changed to the Army of the United States after the Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776. That Army was mostly disbanded after the war but was reformed as the 1st American Regiment for national service June 2, 1784. By that fall, the whole U.S. Army was one regiment, consisting of eight infantry and two artillery companies.

The U.S. Army has participated in every conflict both on America’s shores and abroad defending our nation and its citizens ever since. Thousands of soldiers are participating in a variety of missions around the world at any given time ranging from security and defense to outreach and humanitarian operations.

The U.S. Army is encouraging soldiers and supporters to celebrate its 247th birthday in a variety of ways.

Everyone is invited to complete the 2.47-mile Army Birthday Challenge by running, walking or hiking in honor of the Army's Birthday and share your efforts on social media by tagging @USARMY or using #ARMY247 and #ArmyBday hashtags.

The Army Birthday Wreath Laying Ceremony at 9 a.m. June 14 at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier At Arlington National Cemetery will commemorate the Army's Birthday and honor all who have paid the ultimate sacrifice. The public is invited to tune in to this event which will be livestreamed and available on all Army social media channels.

A special Twitter Spaces Session – Defending America 24/7 – will be hosted by Sergeant Major of the Army, Sgt. Maj. Michael A. Grinston [MKCCDLAM(1] and will feature four soldiers stationed all over the globe as they discuss what Defending America 24/7 means to them. The live conversation will be hosted on the @USArmy Twitter platform on June 14 at 2 p.m.

The U.S Army has a dedicated webpage for this year’s birthday activities and includes sections on the history of the Army, the year in photos, Army Core Values, Army 101 and the US Army Vision and Strategy through 2028.
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO 

In re:

Elaine M. Vélez Torres

(TS-12,858)

2024 TSPR 103

214 DPR ___

Número del Caso: AB-2020-0048

Fecha: 20 de septiembre de 2024

Oficina de Inspección de Notarías:

Lcdo. Manuel E. Ávila De Jesús

Director

Representante Legal de la peticionaria:

Lcdo. Luis E. Miñana Rodríguez-Feo

Materia: Reinstalación al ejercicio de la notaría.

Este documento está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del proceso 

de compilación y publicación oficial de las decisiones del Tribunal 

Supremo. Su distribución electrónica se hace como un servicio 

público a la comunidad.
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

In re:

Elaine M. Vélez Torres 

 (TS-12,858)

 

 

AB-2020-0048

RESOLUCIÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 20 de septiembre de 2024.

 Examinada la Moción en cumplimiento de orden

presentada por la Lcda. Elaine M. Vélez Torres, así 

como la Moción en cumplimiento de orden presentada 

por la Oficina de Inspección de Notarías (ODIN), se 

ordena el archivo de la queja. Se apercibe a la 

letrada que en el futuro deberá cumplir estricta y 

fielmente con la Ley Notarial y su Reglamento.

Del mismo modo, se reinstala a la licenciada Vélez 

Torres al ejercicio de la notaría, condicionado a que 

nos acredite la adquisición de una fianza notarial 

buena y válida. Una vez cumpla con lo anterior y se 

emita la resolución correspondiente aprobando la 

fianza notarial y reinstalándola al ejercicio de la 

notaría, la licenciada Vélez Torres tendrá la 

obligación de recoger la obra protocolar depositada y 

custodiada en el Archivo general de Protocolos del

Distrito Notarial de Caguas, así como su sello 

notarial en custodia de la ODIN.

Lo acordó el Tribunal y certifica el Secretario 

del Tribunal Supremo. El Juez Asociado señor Estrella 

Martínez no intervino.

 Javier O. Sepúlveda Rodríguez

 Secretario del Tribunal Supremo
**Exhibit32.2**

**Certification of PrincipalFinancial OfficerRequired by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)of the Exchange Act**

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Advanstar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three and sixmonths ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W. Montgomery, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

(1)             The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)             The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ David W. Montgomery |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | David W. Montgomery     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                    |
|   | Date: August 14, 2006   |

 

----
Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on  Form  S-8  (Reg.  Nos.  333-30330,  333-39327,  333-82137),  and
Amendment No. 1 to Form SB-2 on Form S-3 (Reg.  No.  333-18667)  of  MyTurn.com,
Inc. of our report dated March 24, 2000,  except for Note 15, for which the date
is April 4, 2000,  relating  to the  consolidated  financial  statements,  which
appears in this Form 10-KSB.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tampa, Florida
April 11, 2000



<PAGE>
/ 

Docket No: 2016-2859 Directorate ID: 2016-NE-04-AD 

Disposition Comments 

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP03709EN-E 

Next Step: i2!l FRAN 0 SNFRM 

D These comments are in 

response to an SNPRM 

IZJ No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received -ljthis box is checked, no signatures are 

required. 

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRl\11 was issued? 

If yes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the 

previously published NP RM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point 

for guidance. 

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9. 

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because N/ A. Make the following changes to the AD: If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with Insert text because Insert justification We disagree with 

Insert text because Insert j ustificatioo Make the following changes to the AD: Llst any 

changes to the AD 

If NO, we don't agree because Insert our rationale 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: Choose one. 

If other, explain: Click here to enter text. 

Commenter(s): Click here to enter text
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 23

To amend title 17, United States Code, to clarify news reporting monitoring

as a fair use exception to the exclusive rights of a copyright owner.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 17, United States Code, to clarify news

reporting monitoring as a fair use exception to the exclusive rights of a copyright owner.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 107 of title 17, United States Code, is

4 amended by inserting ‘‘or monitoring news reporting pro5 gramming’’ after ‘‘news reporting’’.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 24, 2011 

p0516 

Order 

 

May 24, 2011 

142523 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142523 

 COA: 293325 

Benzie CC: 07-002025-FC 

DENNIS BRADFORD KING, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of Davis v United States, cert gtd ___ US ___; 131 S Ct 502; 178 L Ed 2d 368 

(2010), is pending before the United States Supreme Court and that the decision in that 

case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we 

ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case. 

ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
# DLA to modernize warehouse operations 

/ Published Jan. 16, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
The Defense Logistics Agency is keeping up with innovation and technology changes in warehouse operations by leveraging commercial, off-the-shelf software by SAP.

The Warehouse Management System, consisting of the Extended Warehousing Module and Transportation Module, will help modernize the Distribution Standard System that DLA Distribution and DLA Disposition Services use to conduct warehousing, depot and transportation functions. Potential benefits include use of the Automated Storage/Automated Retrieval System, Warehouse Robotic Arm Picking, Autonomous Guided Vehicle and Augmented Reality. 

“Our warehouses are the strategic hub of DLA’s ever-extending supply chain in support of the warfighter,” said Karyn Runstrom, deputy chief information officer. “Exciting as it is to be entering a new decade, the landscape has been transformed with the arrival of many different security challenges and opportunities in robotics, automation and artificial intelligence, which can propel DOD upward.” 

WMS development has already started with a pilot program at DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas. Full implementation there is scheduled for the second quarter of fiscal 2021. All other DLA Distribution and DLA Disposition Services warehouses are scheduled to be fully operational the second quarter of fiscal 2023. 

SAP is a key component of DLA’s Enterprise Resource Planning and data management programs. It is also auditable. 

“The emphasis is on using SAP standard processes with a minimal amount of software alteration to accommodate DLA-unique requirements. Minimizing customization will result in lower deployment costs, greater auditability and reduced project risk overall,” Runstrom said, adding that customizations will be approved by the WMS Executive Committee.

WMS is being developed in the cloud to reduce infrastructure costs using Agile methodology. The benefits of Agile include faster time to market, reduced cost, reduced project risk, high quality products and solutions, immediate value, increased customer satisfaction, and an ability to adjust to requirement changes. 

DLA is partnering with Agile teams to co-locate information technology professionals, functional subject matter experts and software developers for daily collaboration. The agency is also working with the U.S. Transportation Command’s Transportation Management System prototype to share lessons learned and resolve common roadblocks.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Distribution Management
Services, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Leo
Greenfield, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

July 27, 2007                           /s/ Leo Greenfield
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Leo Greenfield,
                                        CEO, Principal Executive Officer
                                        and Principal Accounting Officer
No. 01-14-01015-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT 

HOUSTON, TEXAS 

SANDRA NZE

Appellant 

V.

UCHENNA NWABUEZE 

Appellee 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

APPELLEE’S MOTION TO ENQUIRE ON THE STATUS OF APPELLEE’S MOTIONS 

IN OPPOSITION TO APPLELLANT’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSIONS

Comes Now the Appellee, Uchenna Nwabueze, by and through his attorney of record, 

and presents this Motion to Enquire on the Status of Appellee’s Motions in Opposition of 

Appellant’s Requests for Extensions to file a brief in the above styled case. Appellee would show 

the Court the following: 

1. This is an appeal from an eviction case wherein Appellant was ordered by the Justice 

Court to vacate the premises in question. The County Court, on appeal, affirmed the 

Justice Court’s ruling and ordered Appellant to vacate the premises on or before 

December 31, 2014. 

2. Appellant made a second request for an extension. She filed a request, on her own, 

for an extension, in March 2015, and again in April 2015 when she retained the 

services of an attorney who filed the second request for an extension. The attorney’s 

reasons for the extension is that council has “previously scheduled depositions 

through April 28, 2015.” 

3. Appellee filed two Motions in Opposition of Appellant’s request for extensions to file 

a brief in this case. 

4. It is now May and Appellant to date has not filed a brief. 

ACCEPTED

01-14-01015-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

5/25/2015 11:20:22 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/25/2015 11:20:22 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2

5. Appellee continues to suffer enormous financial hardship while this appeal is pending 

because Appellant continues to occupy the residence without payment of rent or costs 

to Appellee.

Appellee respectfully presents to the Court this Motion to Enquire on Appellee’s Motions 

Opposing Appellant’s Request for Extension to file a brief, and a ruling on the issues in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

WHITE LAW OFFICE

BY: ___ s/ Carlettte White

Carlette White, 

P.O. Box

Sugar Land, Texas 77487

TBN: 21516430

281-203-0800

713-391-8724 fax

Whitelawoffice1@aol.com

 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been furnished by VIA email to 

Appellant’s Attorney of Record on this 25th day of May, 2015.

BY: ___/s/ Carlettte White____________

Carlette White, Attorney for Appellee
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 77.38 W Meters AGL
No. 09-9749.

#### Deborah Rae Handley, Petitioner v. W. Elaine Chapman, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 842, 131 S. Ct. 71,

178 L. Ed. 2d 49,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5922.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 587 F.3d 273.
#### In the Matter of French-American Aid for Children, Inc., et al., Respondents. Joerg Klebe, Appellant; Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 850]

Decree, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Rita Mella, S.), entered June 9, 2016, inter alia, adjudging that petitioner’s revocation of a trust of which objectant is a trustee was valid, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Objectant’s contention that petitioner did not properly revoke the trust because it used Estates, Powers and Trusts Law § 7-1.9 (a) instead of section 8-1.1 (c) (2) is unavailing. Before 1985, cases held that a charitable trust could use the predecessor of EPTL 7-1.9 (a) *(see e.g. Hanover Bank v United Brethren’s Church on Staten Is.,*134 NYS2d 356, 361-362 [Sup Ct, NY County 1954]). In 1985, EPTL 7-1.9 was amended to add paragraph (c), which provided that “[a] trust wholly benefitting one or more charitable beneficiaries *may*be terminated as provided for by” EPTL 8-1.1 (c) (2) (emphasis added). Nothing in either the text of EPTL 7-1.9 (c) or the legislative history thereof indicates that charitable trusts were restricted to EPTL 8-1.1 (c) (2) after 1985 *(see generally Allstate Ins. Co. v Belt Parkway Imaging, P.C.,*78 AD3d 592 [1st Dept 2010]). Moreover, post-amendment cases indicate that charitable trusts may still use EPTL 7-1.9 (a) *(see e.g. Board of Trustees of Museum of Am. Indian, Heye Found. v Board of Trustees of Huntington Free Lib. & Reading Room,*197 AD2d 64, 85-86 [1st Dept 1994], *lv denied*86 NY2d 702 [1995]; *Matter of Forester,*NYLJ, Dec. 3, 2001 at 17, col 3 [Sur Ct, NY County 2001]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.