alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2225 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2225

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a salmon captive 
                          broodstock program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 21 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a salmon captive 
                          broodstock program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Winter Run Chinook Salmon Captive 
Broodstock Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF SALMON CAPTIVE BROODSTOCK PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (d), the Secretary of the 
Interior (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ``Secretary'') 
shall conduct in accordance with this section a salmon captive 
broodstock program (hereinafter in this section referred to as the 
``Program'').
    (b) Program.--The program shall be carried out in a manner that is 
consistent with the goals, priorities, and policies set forth in any 
recovery plan for winter run Chinook salmon in the Sacramento River 
developed by the National Marine Fisheries Service under the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973, and with findings of consultations regarding that 
population of salmon carried out pursuant to section 7 of that Act.
    (c) Consultation.--The Secretary shall consult with the Winter Run 
Chinook Salmon Captive Broodstock Committee (a committee identified in 
the document entitled ``Biological Assessment on the Effects of Coleman 
National Fish Hatchery Operations on Winter Run Chinook Salmon'', 
prepared by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service) in making 
management decisions regarding the Program.
    (d) State Matching.--The Secretary may not implement this section 
unless not less than 20 percent of amounts necessary to conduct the 
Program are provided by non-Federal sources.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to conduct the Program $1,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998.

                                 <all>
```
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2086

To amend the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 to remove the 7 percent

interest rate limitation on certain Rural Electrification Administration

loans, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 6 (legislative day, MAY 2), 1994

Mr. LEAHY (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To amend the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 to remove

the 7 percent interest rate limitation on certain Rural

Electrification Administration loans, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF MAXIMUM INTEREST RATE LIMI4 TATION ON FFB LOAN REFINANCING.

5 Section 306C of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936

6 (7 U.S.C. 936c) is amended—
2

•S 2086 IS

1 (1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘, except

2 that such rate shall not be greater than 7 percent

3 per year, subject to subsection (d)’’; and

4 (2) by striking subsection (d).

Æ
# DLA, Army leaders discuss demand planning, service performance priorities

/ Published Dec. 10, 2021
ARLINGTON, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency leaders outlined how the agency will continue assisting the Army in reducing costs and discussed mutual readiness objectives during an Army/DLA Day event at the Pentagon Dec. 7.

DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic; Army Lt. Gen. Duane Gamble, the service’s deputy chief of staff for logistics; and Army Materiel Command Executive Deputy Lisha Adams and Supply Chain Management Director Dean Maddox led the event, which included representatives from each of DLA’s major subordinate commands.

Although the last Army/DLA briefing occurred more than two years ago, Skubic said in the meantime leadership teams have participated in forums that allowed perpetual interactions and led to candid and transparent conversations. 

Gamble and Adams agreed that DLA has an integral part of increasing Army supply chain performance while optimizing costs. DLA can also help the Army save money in storage and distribution costs by helping them decide when to repair equipment versus purchasing new items or choosing to dispose of materials instead of paying for maintenance and warehouse storage.

Other topics included supply chain optimization and performance-based agreement metrics, as well as inventory and material replacement rates, demand planning, supply availability and uniform support. The latter included discussion about the Army’s improved maternity work uniforms, shortfalls in delivery schedules and renegotiation of long-term contracts with clothing and textiles vendors. 

DLA Finance Director Art Hagler talked about the working capital fund, DLA’s investments in supply chain inventory, Army spending and how DLA can help the service reduce their bills and recoup total storage costs based on projected workload. He also addressed DLA’s plans to ensure strategic priorities and external mandates such as information technology modernization, G-invoicing, warehouse management system and audit are properly resourced through fiscal 2023.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Duncan Hayward, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Duncan Hayward
------------------

Duncan Hayward
Chief Accounting Officer
August 14, 2007

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re
Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31203-31204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15152]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Department 
of Energy, Los Alamos National Laboratory

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Committee meeting: Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Los Alamos National Laboratory.

DATES: Thursday, June 25, 1998: 6:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m., 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 
p.m. (public comment session).

ADDRESS: Cities of Gold Casino Hotel, Pojoaque, New Mexico.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ann DuBois, Northern New Mexico 
Citizens' Advisory Board, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 528 35th 
Street, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, (505) 665-5048.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Advisory Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE and its regulators in the areas of environmental 
restoration, waste management, and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

    6:00 p.m. Call to Order by DOE
    6:00 p.m. Welcome by Chair, Roll Call, Approval of Agenda and 
Minutes
    6:30 p.m. Public Comments
    7:00 p.m. Break
    7:15 p.m. Board Business
    9:00 p.m. Adjourn

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The public 
may file

[[Page 31204]]

written statements with the Committee, either before or after the 
meeting. A sign-up sheet will also be available at the door of the 
meeting room to indicate a request to address the Board. Individuals 
who wish to make oral presentations, other than during the public 
comment period, should contact Ms. Ann DuBois at (505) 665-5048 five 
(5) business days prior to the meeting to request that the Board 
consider the item for inclusion at this or a future meeting. The 
Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting in a 
fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 
1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585 between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available by writing to Mr. Mat 
Johansen, Deputy Designated Federal Officer, Department of Energy, Los 
Alamos Area Office, 528 35th Street, Los Alamos, NM 87185-5400.

    Issued at Washington, DC on June 3, 1998.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-15152 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 10-5585.

#### Jonathan C. Daniels, Petitioner v. E. K. McDaniel, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 930, 131 S. Ct. 323,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7223.

178 L. Ed. 2d 210,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5045.

#### Jevegeni Sorokin, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 900, 131 S. Ct. 233,

178 L. Ed. 2d 154,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6354.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2391 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2391

 To repeal the prohibitions against political recommendations relating 
             to Federal employment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 15 (legislative day, August 11), 1994

 Mr. Simon (for himself, Mr. Pryor, Mr. DeConcini, Mr. Metzenbaum, and 
   Mr. Reid) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the prohibitions against political recommendations relating 
             to Federal employment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITIONS AGAINST POLITICAL RECOMMENDATIONS 
              RELATING TO FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT.

    (a) Federal Employment.--(1) Section 3303 of title 5, United States 
Code, is repealed.
    (2)(A) The table of sections for chapter 33 of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended by striking out the item relating to section 
3303.
    (B) Section 2302(b)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 
to read as follows:
            ``(2) solicit or consider any recommendation or statement, 
        oral or written, with respect to any individual who requests or 
        is under consideration for any personnel action unless such 
        recommendation or statement is based on the personal knowledge 
        or records of the person furnishing it and consists of--
                    ``(A) an evaluation of the work performance, 
                ability, aptitude, or general qualifications of such 
                individual; or
                    ``(B) an evaluation of the character, loyalty, or 
                suitability of such individual;''.
                                 <all>
```
[73 NE3d 342, 51 NYS3d 2]

#### In the Matter of East Ramapo Central School District, Appellant, v John B. King, Jr., in His Official Capacity as the Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Argued February 8, 2017;

decided March 28, 2017

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP,*New York City and Washington, D.C. *(Randall M. Levine, David J. Butler, Stephanie*
      *939
      *Schuster*and *Judd E. Stone*of counsel), and *Harris Beach PLLC,*Albany *(Douglas E. Gerhardt*of counsel), for appellant.

*Eric T Schneiderman, Attorney General,*Albany *(<Jeffrey W. Lang, Barbara D. Underwood*and *Andrea Oser*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The issue on appeal is whether the East Ramapo Central School District (the District) may obtain CPLR article 78 review of a determination by the New York State Education Department (the State) that the District’s dispute resolution practices for placing students with disabilities violated a federal statute — the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the IDEA [20 USC § 1400 *et seq.])*— and related state law, and which directed the District to revise its practices accordingly. The Appellate Division dismissed the District’s article 78 petition on the basis that there was no private right of action in the IDEA that would permit the District to bring a claim of this nature (130 AD3d 19, 20 [3d Dept 2015]). We affirm but on different grounds.

In 2012, the State found that the District’s dispute resolution practices violated federal and state law and directed the District to take corrective action. Although the State informed the District that failure to comply could result in further enforcement actions, including withholding federal funds, the State did not make a final decision to withhold funds.

A proceeding under CPLR article 78 “shall not be used to challenge a determination . . . which is not final or can be adequately reviewed by appeal to a court or to some other body or officer” (CPLR 7801 [1]). Likewise, this Court has recognized that “[t]o challenge an administrative determination, the agency action must be final and binding upon the petitioner” *(Matter of Ranco Sand & Stone Corp. v Vecchio,*27 NY3d 92, 98 [2016] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). In addition, in the absence of injury, there is no standing to bring an article 78 proceeding *(see Matter of Dairylea Coop. v Walkley,*38 NY2d 6, 11 [1975]).

Assuming, without deciding, that a school district may bring an article 78 proceeding to challenge a final determination by the State under the IDEA, here, the State has not made a final *940determination, the District has not shown that it has exhausted its administrative remedies, and the District is unable to articulate any actual, concrete injury that it has suffered at this juncture. Accordingly, the District’s petition was properly dismissed.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
# Aviation senior leaders converge on Richmond for conference

/ Published Nov. 14, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
Close to 40 senior military and civilian leaders from across the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Enterprise came together in the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia for the DLA Aviation Senior Leader Alignment and Commitment Meeting Nov. 8 and 9.

The theme for the event, formerly known as the Senior Leadership Conference, was “DLA Aviation: Aligned and Committed.”

DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler kicked off the two-day event by delivering opening remarks, going over the purpose and intent of the SLAC and welcoming those who traveled from as far away as San Diego, California.

“I really love getting all of our leadership together in person to where we can really talk about those key things we are working on or need to work on to support our people and organization.” Tyler said. “We want to recommit to those initiatives and further define any new ones we need to get after or any more special attention we need to put on existing ones.”

Tyler unveiled the FY23-24 DLA Aviation Operating Plan during his “Mission and Intent” presentation.

“My intent is to develop capabilities that provide a foundation to achieve the short, mid, and long-term goals of DLA’s Strategic Plan and provide the ability for our Major Subordinate Command to satisfy the material requirements needed to compete with, deter, or if necessary, defeat our adversaries.”

This intent includes supporting the DLA Strategic Plan 2021 – 2026 five Lines of Efforts and associated objectives:

- Warfighter Always: Tailored solutions to drive readiness.

- Support to the Nation: Deliberate approach, without tradeoff to the Warfighter.

- Trusted Mission Partner: Transparency and accountability to our customers.

- Modernized Acquisition and Supply Chain Management: Leading in logistics to deliver best value and manage risk.

- Future of Work: Adapting to new ways of working.

During the two-day meeting, participants heard from DLA Vice Director Brad Bunn, DLA Comptroller/Director Jason Buys; DLA Aviation Deputy Director Charlie Lilli, DLA Aviation and DLA Aviation Acquisition Executive Cathy Contreras, who gave an overview of fiscal 23 challenges. Navy Capt. Ron Hoak, chief of DLA Aviation’s Customer Operations Directorate’s Navy Customer Facing Division, facilitated a strategic shift to industrial panel discussion.

“The two days were great, but now it’s going to be about the things we want to really focus on: number one, how do we do it, and number two, who does it. The how and the who are really going to be key.” said Tyler.
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN NO. 03-01-00313-CV United States

Gypsum Co., Appel

lant v. William Osteen, Albert Gore and Hamer L ong, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98T H JUDICIAL DIST RICT NO. 96- 05587, H ONORABLE LO RA J. LIV INGSTON, JU

DGE P RESIDIN G PER CURIAM

Appe llantUn

i te d Sta tes Gy psum Co. h as f i l ed an un opp ose d m

oti on to dism i ss i ts ap pe al. We gr an t t he mo t io n a nd dis miss t he ap pe al. Be f ore C hi ef Ju sti ceA bouss i e, J us ti ce s Y ea

ke l an d Pa tters on Di sm i ss ed on A ppe l l an t’s Moti on File d: August 30, 2001 Do No t Publis

h
159 A.3d 889

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EARL SMITH, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 1, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2098

To amend section 217 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that military moving expense reimbursements are excluded from income

without regard to the deductibility of the expenses reimbursed.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 10 (legislative day, MAY 2), 1994

Mr. GRAMM (for himself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. LOTT, Mr. SHELBY, and Mrs.

HUTCHISON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend section 217 of the Internal Revenue Code of

1986 to provide that military moving expense reimbursements are excluded from income without regard to the

deductibility of the expenses reimbursed.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM INCOME OF MILITARY MOV4 ING EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENTS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 217(b)(1) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to the definition of moving

7 expenses) is amended by striking ‘‘For’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘Except as provided in subsection (g)(2), for’’.
2

S 2098 IS

1 (b) EXCLUSION.—Section 217(g)(2) of the Internal

2 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to rules for deducting

3 moving expenses for members of the Armed Forces) is

4 amended to read as follows:

5 ‘‘(2) any moving and storage expenses—

6 ‘‘(A) which are furnished in kind, or

7 ‘‘(B) for which reimbursement or an allow8 ance is provided, but only to the extent of the

9 expenses paid or incurred,

10 to such member, the member’s spouse, or the mem11 ber’s dependents, shall not be includible in gross in12 come, without regard to whether the expenses reim13 bursed would otherwise be deductible under this sec14 tion, and’’.

15 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

16 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to ex17 penses incurred after December 31, 1993.

Æ
<PAGE>
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 and related Prospectus pertaining to the 1997
Performance Award Plan of our report dated January 27, 1997 with respect to
the combined financial statements of U.S. Rentals, Inc. (Predecessor), which
appears on Page F-2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of U.S. Rentals,
Inc., and of our report dated January 27, 1997 with respect to the financial
statements of U.S. Rentals, Inc. (the Company), which appears on Page F-14 of
the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of U.S. Rentals, Inc., such
Registration Statement on Form S-1 relating to the Company's initial public
offering filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 
/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
 
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Sacramento, California
March 23, 1998
<PAGE>
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 and related Prospectus pertaining to the 1997
Performance Award Plan of U.S. Rentals, Inc. of our report dated January 28,
1998 appearing on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.


/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Sacramento, California
March 23, 1998
# Four slated for induction into 2023 DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame

/ Published April 5, 2023
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Commander Army Brig. Gen. Gail Atkins has announced the 2023 inductees into the organization’s Hall of Fame.

“Since its inception in 2005, the DLA Land and Maritime Hall of Fame has sought to honor inspiring past associates who embodied our values and built upon our civil service heritage in support of the warfighter,” she said in a workforce-wide announcement Monday. “Their character as outstanding leaders, respected mentors and formidable subject matter experts set [this year’s inductees] apart as legacy leaders within their respective organizations.”

Inductees are:
      - Daniel Bell, former site director, DLA Installation Management – Columbus.
      - Kimberly Burtrum, former lead management analyst, Maritime Supplier Operations, DLA Land and Maritime.
      - Daniel Neidert, former supervisory customer relationship specialist, Maritime Customer Operations, DLA Land and Maritime.
      - Charles Palmer, former director, DLA Land and Maritime Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity.

The new members will be inducted May 31 at the Operations Center Auditorium on Defense Supply Center Columbus.