alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2333 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 588
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2333

                          [Report No. 103-346]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel SHAMROCK V.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 28 (legislative day, July 20), 1994

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

              August 19 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

              Reported by Mr. Hollings, with an amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel SHAMROCK V.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the 
vessel SHAMROCK V (United States official number -9-0-0-0-3-6-)-. 
900936).
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 588

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2333

                          [Report No. 103-346]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel SHAMROCK V.

_______________________________________________________________________

              August 19 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

                       Reported with an amendment
```
No. 09-11076.

#### Herbert Banks, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 861, 131 S. Ct. 137,

178 L. Ed. 2d 83,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6449,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

*84Same case below, 29 So. 3d 293.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001027343
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING I, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                   333,567
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               333,568
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 333,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    283,505
<COMMON>                                        50,063
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   333,568
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,745
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,745
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,745
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,745
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
2017-0237.

#### Turner v. State.

In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. On petitioner’s motion to be conveyed and motion to dismiss all cases or charges. Motions denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32(b)**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of ALLTEL Corporation (the
      Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      Report), I, Sharilyn S. Gasaway, Executive Vice President - Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;


and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of


operations
      of the Company.








/s/
      Sharilyn S. Gasaway


Sharilyn
      S. Gasaway


Executive
      Vice President - Chief Financial Officer


October
      19, 2007



































A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      ALLTEL Corporation and will be retained by ALLTEL Corporation and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0478 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM138AD MPD ENV, R30 --- 4/1/10 AAL AMM 12 - 22 - 32 (NO DATE)

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### Mary Murray et al., Respondents, v Villa Barone Ristorante, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[49 NYS3d 119]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, *459J.), entered on or about October 11, 2016, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied in this action where plaintiff Mary Murray was injured when she fell while ascending the stairs in defendants’ restaurant. Plaintiff testified that as she attempted to move her foot to the next step, it came in contact with the front lip of the second step, and contrary to defendants’ assertion, plaintiff also testified that she had to bend down to grab the handrail, which was low. This evidence, as well as the affidavit of plaintiffs’ expert engineer, who opined that the low positioning of the handrails and the higher position of the step risers were in violation of various New York City Building Codes, sufficiently raised triable issues as to whether the riser height of the stairs and low handrail were proximate causes of plaintiff’s injuries *(see Lievano v Browning School,*265 AD2d 233 [1st Dept 1999]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.
#### Revels v Schoeps

1st Dept: 140 AD3d 661

denied
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 42


### ★

▲ ▲ ▲
▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/08 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
No. 12-8158.

#### Shlikas *v.*Arrow Financial Services et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Here to serve you in '22

/ Published Feb. 10, 2022
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Resolutions are made, broken and then forgotten every year. But the Morale, Welfare and Recreation team at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center in Battle Creek, Michigan, is here to help you keep your resolution to physical fitness.The MWR team created a video to showcase some of there offerings to help your keep that resolution.Fitness helps in all aspects of your life and improves your resiliency at home and at work.

05:05VIDEO  | 05:05 |HDIFC Fitness Center MWRNote that offerings may vary depending on current staffing and availability of programs.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 12, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00147

- CV

CITY OF LAREDO , Texas, Appellant

v.

Julian Jacobo REYNA

, Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CVQ

- 000557 D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellee’s brief in this accelerated appeal was due May 4, 2015. The b rief has not been

filed.

We order appellee to file his brief by May 15, 2015 . If the brief is not filed by the date ordered, we will order the case submitted without an appellee’s brief.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

I N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Cou rt
----

**CONSENT OF EXPERT**

 Dr. David M. Stone   MineFill Services, Inc.   PO Box 725, Bothell, Washington   USA 98041 

 To:              US  Securities and Exchange Commission 

 Re:              Anooraq  Resources Corporation Form on 20F for the Fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

I, David Stone, P.Eng., hereby certify that I have read the disclosure in connection with the Boikgantsho Joint Venture Property contained in the subject 20F and hereby consent to the reference to myself as a named expert in the written disclosurein the Form 20F of Anooraq Resources Corporation. 

Dated this 13 day of June, 2005.
EXHIBIT 8.1

ANOORAQ RESOURCES CORPORATION

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AS AT MARCH 30, 2012



|                                                              |  |                          |  |                                 |     |  
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- | --- | -
|Company                                                       |  | Country of Incorporation |  | Proportion ofownership interest |    
|                                                              |  |                         
|N1C Resources Incorporation                                   |  | Cayman Islands           |  |                                 | 100 | %
|                                                              |  |                         
|Anooraq Minera Mexicana ^                                     |  | Mexico                   |  |                                 |    |  
|                                                              |  |                         
|N2C Resources Incorporation *                                 |  | Cayman Islands           |  |                                 | 100 | %
|                                                              |  |                         
|Plateau Resources (Proprietary) Limited *                     |  | South Africa             |  |                                 | 100 | %
|                                                              |  |                         
|Bokoni Holdings (Proprietary) Limited *                       |  | South Africa             |  |                                 | 51  | %
|                                                              |  |                         
|Bokoni Mine (Proprietary) Limited *                           |  | South Africa             |  |                                 | 51  | %
|                                                              |  |                         
|Boikgantsho (Proprietary) Limited *                           |  | South Africa             |  |                                 | 51  | %
|                                                              |  |                         
|Kwanda (Proprietary) Limited *                                |  | South Africa             |  |                                 | 51  | %
|                                                              |  |                         
|Ga-Phasha (Proprietary) Limited *                             |  | South Africa             |  |                                 | 51  | %
|                                                              |  |                         
|Lebowa Platinum Mine Limited * #                              |  | South Africa             |  |                                 | 51  | %
|                                                              |  |                         
|Middlepunt Hill Management Services (Proprietary) Limited * # |  | South Africa             |  |                                 | 51  | %



^-
Entity has been liquidated

*- Indirectly held

#- These entities are dormant
No. 09-11462.

#### Sealed Petitioner, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 882, 131 S. Ct. 203,

178 L. Ed. 2d 122,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7077.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Small, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 875]

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J.), dated April 6, 2016, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the same court rendered July 23, 2008, as modified by decision and order of this Court dated June 1, 2010 *(People v Small,*74 AD3d 843 [2010]), convicting him of burglary in the second degree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, or pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside the sentence imposed on the burglary count.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The County Court properly denied, without a hearing, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate his judgment of conviction. The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel due to counsel’s strategic decision not to call the defendant’s brother as an alibi witness at trial is without merit *558
      *(see People v Caban,*5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005]; *People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]). Moreover, the defendant’s additional arguments regarding ineffective assistance of counsel are similarly unavailing.

Furthermore, while the defendant contends that his sentence for burglary in the second degree was illegally influenced by the County Court’s consideration of his subsequently vacated conviction of attempted rape in the first degree *(see People v Small,*74 AD3d 843 [2010]), his claim is not supported by the evidence before us *(see*CPL 440.20 [1]). Accordingly, his contention is without merit, and the denial of that branch of his motion which was pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside his sentence was proper.

Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Cohen and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
No. 10-5102.

#### Garworth Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 904, 131 S. Ct. 241,

178 L. Ed. 2d 161,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6655.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 359.
No. 09-11379.

#### Eugene Williams, Petitioner v. Ray Lawler, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

562 U.S. 877, 131 S. Ct. 187,

178 L. Ed. 2d 113,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6959.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# National EMS Week Spotlight: Chris Abraham

/ Published May 19, 2021
Richmond, Va., 
National Emergency Medical Technician Week will be celebrated May 16 – 22. This year’s theme is “This Is EMS: Caring for Our Communities.” According to the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians website, in 1974 President Gerald Ford authorized Emergency Medical Services Week to celebrate EMS practitioners and the important work they do in our nation's communities. Back then, EMS was a new profession and practitioners had only just started to be recognized as a critical component of emergency medicine and the public health safety net. EMS is now firmly established as an essential public function and a vital component of the medical care continuum.EMS practitioners care for their patients' medical needs and show caring and compassion to their patients in their most difficult moments. As part of National EMS Week, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and DLA Installation Management Richmond are spotlighting an emergency medical technician at Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, to honor their dedication in providing day-to-day lifesaving services on medicine's "front line.”

**Name:**Chris Abraham    

**Organization:** DLA Installation Operations Security and Emergency Services Division, Fire and Emergency Services Branch 

**Years of service:** 14 years with DLA

**What is your job, specifically?** Firefighter, Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic, Hazmat Technician**Why did you decide to go into a public service career?**I wanted to be able to help my family and others during times of need.**Please share with us a memorable event in your job.**We had a call shortly after I was cleared as a medic for a lady behaving strangely.  It turned out that she was having a stroke and we transported her to the hospital. She was able to go home that same day after receiving clot busting drugs.**What makes for a great day on the job?**Knowing that I didn’t have to put out a fire or take someone to the hospital.  If we must do either, it means someone has lost something that may not be able to be replaced or their life was in danger for some reason.**What is your favorite work activity?**Teaching**What is your greatest achievement on the job**? Knowing that I have helped others in achieving their goals.**What would you say to encourage someone to go into public service?**Take a chance and do a ride-along at your local fire or EMS station and see if it is for you.  There is always a need for additional personnel and you might find out that you really enjoy helping others.**Do you do any volunteer work in the community? If so, what?** No, I used to volunteer at both my local rescue squad and fire department.**What are you usually doing when not at work?**Taking classes or learning about investing.**How do you define excellence?**Excellence is when you are so good at something that other people come to you for your assistance because they have faith in your knowledge.**How do you define happiness?**Truly loving whatever you do and that being enough to satisfy you.
#### D.E.G. v. R.A.G.

12/01/2015

768 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 65
#### In the Matter of Philip Benincassa, Petitioner, v Thomas E. Walsh II, Respondent.

[52 NYS3d 648]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent dated June 15, 2016, which, without a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for a pistol license dated March 8, 2016.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the determination is annulled and the matter is remitted to the respondent for a new determination on the petitioner’s application for a pistol license dated March 8, 2016, in accordance herewith, the petition is otherwise denied, and the proceeding is otherwise dismissed.

“The petitioner must be given the specific reasons for the denial of [a] pistol license, and be given an opportunity to respond to the objections to [the] application” *(Matter of Savitch v Lange,*114 AD2d 372, 373 [1985]; *see Matter of Deyo v County*
      *1104
      *Ct. Judge,*215 AD2d 758 [1995]). Here, in denying the petitioner’s application for a pistol license dated March 8, 2016, the respondent failed to give him a specific reason for the denial in writing as required by Penal Law § 400.00 (4-a). The determination, therefore, must be annulled *(see Matter of Parker v Randall,*120 AD3d 946 [2014]; *cf. Matter of Marino v Hubert,*117 AD3d 829, 830 [2014]; *Matter of Pads v Nelson,*224 AD2d 698 [1996]), and the matter remitted to the respondent to provide the petitioner with the specific reasons for the denial of the pistol license and afford the petitioner an opportunity to present evidence in response, and thereafter, for a new determination on the petitioner’s application.

Balkin, J.P., Austin, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0102

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

LAWRENCE JOHN JAKUB,

Defendant and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 22, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 15 2023

12/15/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0102
**EXHBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc.on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dane D. Anderson,Chief Financial Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of MOCON, Inc.

 

 

Date:  May 16, 2005

 
|   | /s/ Dane D. Anderson    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Dane D. Anderson        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----