alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0637

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MARK MENDOZA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time

to and including July 22, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file the 

State’s response.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 15 2020

06/15/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0637
Decided December 20, 2016

#### Abrams v Bute

2d Dept: 138 AD3d 179

denied
Site Spotlight: Colorado Springs
 
  **Site Name:**  DLA Disposition Services Colorado Springs **the team at DLA Disposition Services Colorado Springs sand outside in a lose group photo
        DLA Disposition Services Colorado Springs
            The team at DLA Disposition Services Colorado Springs.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Staff
                    
                    VIRIN: 211201-D-AA987-2112** **Site Size:** Medium **Location:** 1475 Wickersham Blvd. Fort Carson, CO. **Hours of Operations:** 0700-1530 **What services does the site provide?**  DLA Disposition Services at Colorado Springs provides direct support to military and DoD civilian command elements.  Services include on and off-site training, DSR support, disposal operations, environmental, Contracting Officer Representative duties, Hazardous Waste contractual removal at Receipt in Place locations, as well as direct scrap removals at forward located collections sites throughout the Colorado Springs HUB footprint. **What are the major units supported at the site?** US Army 4th ID, 10th Special Forces Group, USAF Academy Peterson AFB, 21st Space Wing, US Strat Com, 377th Air Base Wing at Kirtland AFB, 49th Wing at Holloman AFB, and 27th Special Operations Wing at Cannon AFB. **What are the most notable or unusual item(s) processed by the site?**  B-1 Lancer Aircraft Support. **What is the site’s average annual fiscal year statistics?** 79K lines of property received, 1.5M pounds of scrap removed, $53M of property reutilization, and 1,349 Hazardous Waste lines processed. **Has the site provided any humanitarian support, if so what?** Operation Allied Welcome direct support for 50+ trucks received. **Any special takes/influences on organizational culture?** Rugged outdoor lifestyle.  Hardy individualism. **Are there any unique challenges the site faces?** Constantly changing and challenging weather.  Covering a large geographic area with DSR support. **Is there anything unique about the site or unusual fact about the office?** Highest elevation within the Mid-America AOR.
No. 08-1423.

#### Costco Wholesale Corporation, Petitioner v. Omega, S.A.

562 U.S. 820, 131 S. Ct. 378,

178 L. Ed. 2d 14,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6607.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
No. 09-10573.

#### Carlton Gary, Petitioner v. Steve Upton, Warden.

562 U.S. 847, 131 S. Ct. 91,

178 L. Ed. 2d 57,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6056.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Georgia, Butts County, denied.
No. 09-11566.

#### Jacob McInnis, Sr., Petitioner v. Maine.

562 U.S. 888, 131 S. Ct. 222,

178 L. Ed. 2d 133,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6908.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.

Same case below, 988 A.2d 994.
2016-1696.

#### State v. Bronson.

Hamilton App. No. C-150461.

Fischer, J., not participating.
# Mid-America team honored with agency award

/ Published Feb. 8, 2021
FORT SAM HOUSTON, Texas, 
Defense Logistics Agency employees from DLA Disposition Services’ Mid-America region were among the personnel honored in the DLA Director's Strategic Goals Award for the 4th Quarter of fiscal 2020.

The Mid-America Material Handlers and Support Team from DLA Disposition Services was recognized for its measurable contributions to the DLA Strategic Plan goals Warfighter First, Global Posture and Always Accountable. According to the award nomination, the team overcame austere COVID-19 conditions as Mid-America materials examiners and supporting staff supported the divestiture efforts by the Army’s Forces Command, III Corps, Operations Slim Eagle and Pegasus Harvest, region wide Improved Moving Target Simulator divestitures, and supported turn-ins for 4th Infantry Division’s Stryker conversion. The team’s extra efforts represented over 20,000 additional receipts above and beyond their existing mission critical/essential workload.

The nomination also cites the high recall status Mid-America personnel maintained throughout the worst of the pandemic. Their staffing levels allowed them to standup a proof of concept operation during Operation Pegasus Harvest at Fort Hood, Texas, designed to improve the future of the Army’s III Corps readiness and turn-in efficiency through the use of a dedicated consolidation points.

Fort Carson units also worked with DLA Disposition Services at Colorado Springs, Colorado, where the staff has continued to refine a "Ring Route" concept that combines and pre-screens all Army Field Support battalion turn-ins prior to arrival at our location. Property disposal specialists and material examiners from DLA Disposition Services site Red River likewise contributed with the movement of over 95 Bradley Fighting Vehicles to serve as targets on ranges, representing a large cost avoidance for demilitarization requirements and had an acquisition value in excess of over $100 million dollars.

Kathy Atkins-Nunez, Mid-America region director, said she is extremely proud to work with such professionals. 

“Although we are composed of individual hubs, sites, and office ‘teams,’ these 116 people earned this award, as a ‘Mid-America team,’” Atkins-Nunez said.  “They came together during some challenging times to collectively achieve our common goal – supporting our warfighter --always.”
No. 09-10981.

#### Karen Davis, Petitioner v. Maryland State Department of Education.

562 U.S. 857, 131 S. Ct. 128,

178 L. Ed. 2d 77,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6195.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland denied.

Same case below, 187 Md. App. 721 and 187 Md. App. 729.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Bioenvision, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher B. Wood,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





                                /s/ Christopher B. Wood
                                ------------------------------------
                                Christopher B. Wood
                                Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                September 29, 2003
# Marines, DLA face challenges, strengthen partnership 

/ Published June 13, 2019
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency and Marine Corps leaders met June 12 at DLA’s Fort Belvoir, Virginia, headquarters to discuss how they could grow their partnership and improve mutual support during the annual Marine Corps-DLA Day.

Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams, director of DLA, welcomed guests from across the DLA enterprise and Marine Corps as well Lt. Gen. Charles Chiarotti, deputy commandant of installations and logistics for the Marine Corps. 

Williams said participants often talk about service readiness without addressing the combatant commands, so he invited representatives from DLA Indo-Pacific and DLA Europe & Africa to participate via video teleconference.

In his opening remarks, Chiarotti thanked everyone for attending, adding that he appreciated DLA’s support during the past year. 

“We have benefited from a higher level of readiness across the board, not because of anything I’ve done, but because of things that our teams have done,” he said. 

Despite the challenges, Williams said the DLA Service Readiness Dashboard shows a rise in material availability of more than 90% since last year. 

He thanked the Marine Corps and DLA teams for their collaboration and stressed that the strength of their partnership will be even more important than before with continued funding constraints. 

Weapons systems support and back-order reductions remain priorities for the service and DLA. Other topics included results of the May 1 Demand Planning Summit, additive manufacturing, war reserve program modernization and a review of open tasks.   

Chiarotti said the Marine Corps staff will continue to apply the improvements DLA has helped them implement.

“This is a very challenging and difficult portfolio we have,” he said. “I want to thank you for continued support and I look forward to another year of partnership.” 

The session ended with leaders signing a 2019 performance based agreement that frames DLA’s support of Marine Corps logistics by highlighting key strategic and partnership efforts.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v DaShaun Reed, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 821]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kfeindler, J.), rendered February 17, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), attempted murder in the second degree, kidnapping in the first degree, and kidnapping in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed upon the convictions of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts) and kidnapping in the second degree; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing on those counts in accordance herewith.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that his retrial violated the prohibition against double jeopardy because his first trial ended in a mistrial over his objection. The mistrial was declared after one of the jurors informed the trial court, for the first time during deliberations, that he suffered from panic attacks and claustrophobia. The court questioned the juror at length and ascertained that he was terrified of being in enclosed spaces for any length of time, the jury room was “torture” for him, and he could not “think straight.” After exploring reasonable alternatives, the trial court properly discharged the juror because the nature of his illness rendered him “grossly unqualified” (CPL 270.35 [1]; *see People v Carmona,*265 AD2d 197 [1999]; *People v Mason,*233 AD2d 271 [1996]; *People v McCloud,*182 AD2d 835 [1992]). Since no alternate juror was available, a mistrial was correctly declared out of “manifest necessity” (CPL 270.35, *see*CPL 280.10 [3]; *People v Mason, supra; see generally People v Ferguson, 67*NY2d 383 [1986]). Accordingly, retrial was not barred by the principles of double jeopardy *(see*
      *464
      *People v Mason, supra; Matter of Stressler v Hynes,*169 AD2d 750 [1991]).

The minutes of the sentencing proceeding reveal that the defendant was sentenced to a minimum of 25 years and a maximum of 25 years’ imprisonment on each of his attempted murder and kidnapping in the second degree convictions, a clearly illegal sentence for the instant crimes committed in 1996 *(see People v Mosca,*294 AD2d 938 [2002]; Penal Law § 70.02 [former (3) (a)]). While the record supports the conclusion that either the sentencing court may have misspoken or that there was an error in the transcription, the order of commitment indicates, however, that the sentence imposed was 121⁄2 to 25 years’ imprisonment on each of those counts. This discrepancy requires remittal to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing on the attempted murder and kidnapping in the second degree counts *(see People v Cano,*287 AD2d 730 [2001]; *People v Lerner,*122 AD2d 813 [1986]). S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer


I, William B. Thornton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mid-State Raceway, Inc.
and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 14, 2004


William B. Thornton
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              212182
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        25475
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    300670
<PP&E>                                              187752
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (78914)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      481274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               298560
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          159809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        481274
<SALES>                                            2587480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   2587480
<CGS>                                              2462206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      2462206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     22000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    3809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      99465
<INCOME-TAX>                                         27610
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  71855
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         71855
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .01



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from PacifiCare
Health Systems, Inc.'s condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31,
1999 and related consolidated statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         849,064
<SECURITIES>                                   999,194
<RECEIVABLES>                                  317,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,173
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,344,491
<PP&E>                                         301,821
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,884,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,786,186
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           468
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,977,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,884,021
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,989,090
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,368,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,177,906
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,634
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                481,909
<INCOME-TAX>                                   203,365
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            278,544
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   278,544
<EPS-BASIC>                                     6.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.23


</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DIST RICT OF TEXAS F ORT WORTH

N O S
. 2 - 1 0 - 2 3 6 - C R 2 - 1 0 - 2 3 7 - C R 2 - 1 0 - 2 3 8 - C R 2 - 1 0 - 2 3 9 - C R 2 - 1 0 - 2 4 0 - C R 2 - 1 0 - 2 4 1 - C R 2 - 1 0 - 2 4 2 - C R 2 - 1 0 - 2 4 3 - C R

E X P A R T E K O R Y M I C H A E L G A U T R E A U X

- - - - - - - - - - - - F R O M T H E 2 9 7 T H D I S T R I C T C O U R T O F T A R R A N T C O U N T Y

- - - - - - - - - - - - 

### M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N 1

- - - - - - - - - - - - A p p e l l a n t K o r y M i c h a e l G a u t r e a u x a t t e m p t s t o a p p e a l f r o m t h e t r i a l c o u r t ’ s A p r i l 3 0 , 2 0 1 0 o r d e r s s e t t i n g t h e c o n d i t i o n s o f b o n d

. A p p e l l a n t ’ s n o t i c e o f a p p e a l

w a s d u e b y J u n e 1 , 2 0 1 0 , b u t w a s n o t f i l e d u n t i l J u n e 1 4 , 2 0 1 0

. S e e T e x
. R

. A p p
. P

. 2 6

. 2 ( a ) ( 1 )

. O n J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 1 0 , w e n o t i f i e d A p p e l l a n t o f o u r c o n c e r n t h a t w e l a c k e d

1

 S e e T e x
. R

. A p p
. P

. 4 7

. 4

.j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r t h e s e a p p e a l s d u e t o t h e i r u n t i m e l i n e s s a n d i n f o r m e d h i m t h a t w e

w o u l d d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l s f o r w a n t o f j u r i s d i c t i o n u n l e s s h e o r a n y p a r t y d e s i r i n g t o

c o n t i n u e t h e a p p e a l s f i l e d a r e s p o n s e s h o w i n g g r o u n d s f o r c o n t i n u i n g t h e a p p e a l s b y J u l y 5 , 2 0 1 0

. S e e T e x
. R

. A p p
. P

. 4 4

. 3

. A p p e l l a n t r e s p o n d e d t o o u r j u r i s d i c t i o n a l l e t t e r o n J u l y 1 8 , 2 0 1 0 , b u t t h e r e s p o n s e d o e s n o t s h o w g r o u n d s f o r c o n t i n u i n g t h e

a p p e a l s
. A n o t i c e o f a p p e a l t h a t c o m p l i e s w i t h t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f r u l e 2 6 i s e s s e n t i a l
t o v e s t t h i s c o u r t w i t h j u r i s d i c t i o n
. S l a t o n v
. S t

a t e , 9 8 1 S

. W

. 2 d 2 0 8 , 2 1 0 ( T e x
. C r i m
. A p p
. 1 9 9 8 )

. T h e c o u r t o f c r i m i n a l a p p e a l s h a s e x p r e s s l y h e l d t h a t , w i t h o u t a t i m e l y f i l e d n o t i c e o f a p p e a l o r m o t i o n f o r e x t e n s i o n o f t i m e , w e c a n n o t e x e r c i s e j u r i s d i c t i o n

o v e r a n a p p e a l

. S e e O l i v o v
. S t a t e , 9 1 8 S

. W

. 2 d 5 1 9 , 5 2 2 ( T e x
. C r i m
. A p p
. 1 9 9 6 ) ;

s e e a l s o S l a t o n , 9 8 1 S

. W

. 2 d a t 2 1 0

. B e c a u s e A p p e l l a n t ’ s n o t i c e o f a p p e a l w a s u n t i m e l y , w e h a v e n o b a s i s f o r j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r t h e a p p e a l s
. A c c o r d i n g l y , w e d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l s f o r w a n t o f j u r i s d i c t i o n
. S e e T e x
. R

. A p p
. P

. 4 3

. 2 ( f )

. P E R C U R I A M P A N E L : G A R D N E R , W A L K E R , a n d M C C O Y , J J

. D O N O T P U B L I S H T e x
. R

. A p p
. P

. 4 7

. 2 ( b ) D E L I V E R E D : A u g u s t 1 9 , 2 0 1 0

2