alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Sheldon C. Fenton certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of VeridienCorporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the smallbusiness issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during thesmall business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth physical quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 16, 2004 /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton Sheldon C. FentonChief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
29
No. 09-11124.

#### Leslie V. Anthony, Petitioner v. Office of Personnel Management.

562 U.S. 862, 131 S. Ct. 389,

178 L. Ed. 2d 86,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6002.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 361 Fed. Appx. 142.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND THE CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         687,623
<SECURITIES>                                 3,000,045
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,002,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                   151,750
<INVENTORY>                                  1,595,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,786,631
<PP&E>                                       2,562,933
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,580,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,150,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,921,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       432,788
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,656,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,150,867
<SALES>                                     10,962,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,962,844
<CGS>                                        3,548,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,548,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,443,912
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,170,930
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,272,982
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,272,982
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
        



</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16301]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2603-000]

Southwood 2000, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 15, 1998.
    Southwood 2000, Inc. (Southwood), is a power marketing affiliate of 
Redwood Electric Cooperative and South Central Electric Cooperative, 
rural electric cooperatives engaged in the distribution and sale of 
electric cooperatives engaged in the distribution and sale of electric 
power at retail. Southwood filed an application requesting that the 
Commission authorize it to engage in wholesale power sales at market-
based rates, and for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, 
Southwood requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 
CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liabilities by Southwood. On June 12, 1998, the Commission issued an 
Order Accepting For Filing Proposed Market-Based Rates (Order), in the 
above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's June 12, 1998 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (C), (D), and (F):
    (C) Within 30 days after the date of issuance of this order, any 
person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket 
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by 
Southwood should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC, 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (D) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (C) above, Southwood is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of Southwood, compatible with the 
public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (F) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of 
Southwood's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities * * 
*.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 13, 1998.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16301 Filed 6-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Richard P.  McStravick,  President and Chief Executive  Officer,  and Anthony J.
Fabiano,  Senior Vice  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of Sound Federal
Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company"), each certify in his capacity as an officer of the
Company that he has reviewed  the  Quarterly  Report of the Company on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and that to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   the report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Sections 13(a)
            and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

The purpose of this  statement  is solely to comply  with Title 18,  Chapter 63,
Section  1350 of the United  States  Code,  as  amended  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

November 12, 2003                               /s/ Richard P. McStravick
-----------------                               -------------------------
Date                                            President and Chief Executive
                                                Officer

November 12, 2003                               /s/ Anthony J. Fabiano
-----------------                               ----------------------
Date                                            Senior Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer


                                       24
# Troop Support celebrates two retirees during ceremony

/ Published Aug. 3, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support celebrated the careers of two civilian employees during a retirement ceremony July 27.

Ceremony officiant, DLA Troop Support Commander Army Col. Landis Maddox thanked the retirees and their family members for their combined half-century of service to the country.

“Your time here has made an enormous difference and a huge impact to DLA Troop Support,” Maddox said. “Not only to the accomplishment of the mission, but to the people you have mentored, coached, trained and supported along the way.”

Joyce Wilson retired from the Business Process Support office after 34 years of service with DLA Troop Support. Prior to her civil service, Wilson had a career in the Army going on multiple deployments before retiring as a sergeant major in 2013.

Wilson said she had many people to thank for her career.

“I want to thank my family, I want to thank all the warfighters, and all my teammates who have supported them and the civilians in the field.”

Sharon Mcintosh-Mason began her career in 2006 with DLA Troop Support’s intern program. She retires from the Clothing and Textile supply chain, where she worked for 17 years. In 2016, she was selected as the Federal Woman’s Program, non-supervisory Woman of the Year.

She said the friends she has made during her career will stick with her into her retirement.

“I have made great friends and they will always be with me,” she said. “I want to just thank everyone for your support. Thank you.”

Maddox said the two retirees were great examples of the dedication, pride and expertise that can be found throughout the organizations employees.

“You both serve as models and represent the ideals and values of our workforce and our organization,” he said. “I want to once again thank you for all your valued service to DLA Troop Support, the Department of Defense and our nation.

Each employee received a certificate of retirement, a DLA Troop Support memento, and a commander’s coin. In addition, spouses received certificates of appreciation, respectively.
##### 



Exhibit 11  Computation of Earnings Per Share

|                |                                    |         |   |                                |      |      |   |           |      |      |   |           |      |  |   |           |       |   |   |           |       |  
|--------------- | ---------------------------------- | ------- | - | ------------------------------ | ---- | ---- | - | --------- | ---- | ---- | - | --------- | ---- |  | - | --------- | ----- | - | - | --------- | ----- | -
|                |                                    |         |   | Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
|                |                                    |         |   |                               
|                |                                    |         |   | 2001                           |      | 2000 |   | 1999      |      | 1998 |   | 1997     
|                |                                    |         |   |                                |      |      |   |           |      |      |   |          
|BASIC & DILUTED |                                    |         |   |                                |      |      |   |           |      |      |   |           |      |  |   |           |       |   |   |          
|                | Net income (loss)                  |         | $ | 110,000                        |      |      | $ | 504,000   |      |      | $ | 475,000   |      |  | $ | (113,000  | )     |   | $ | (602,000  | )    
|               
|                | Basic average shares outstanding   |         |   | 1,488,764                      |      |      |   | 1,488,764 |      |      |   | 1,309,966 |      |  |   | 1,265,000 |       |   |   | 1,051,329 |      
|                | Diluted average shares outstanding |         |   | 1,494,328                      |      |      |   | 1,488,764 |      |      |   | 1,309,966 |      |  |   | 1,265,000 |       |   |   | 1,051,329 |      
|               
|                | Net income (loss) per share:       |         |   |                                |      |      |   |           |      |      |   |           |      |  |   |           |       |   |   |           |      
|                |                                    | Basic   |   | $                              | 0.07 |      |   | $         | 0.34 |      |   | $         | 0.36 |  |   | $         | (0.09 | ) |   | $         | (0.57 | )
|                |                                    | Diluted |   | $                              | 0.07 |      |   | $         | 0.34 |      |   | $         | 0.36 |  |   | $         | (0.09 | ) |   | $         | (0.57 | )

50
# DLA vice director emphasizes Strategic Plan during Philadelphia visit

/ Published Sept. 3, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Vice Director Brad Bunn visited DLA Philadelphia for the first time in his current role Sept. 1, and hosted a town hall, attended by employees in-person and virtually.

Bunn credited his previous role as director of DLA Human Resources for his vast understanding of the work employees and senior leaders do across the agency.

“One of the things that equipped me for this role was really getting a good understanding of what the workforce does,” Bunn said. “Of all the organizations I’ve been associated with in my 30-year career, I’ve never been with one that put so much focus and investment on its people. Really seeing what the leaders in this agency do, from the senior military leadership to first line supervisors and every level in between, to cultivate a workforce and culture: that inspires excellence.”

During the town hall Bunn emphasized DLA’s priorities within the Strategic Plan 2021-2026 and the overarching theme of “Transforming Global Logistics” to effectively support stakeholders.

“The number one effort remains the warfighter, in what we call ‘Warfighter Always,’” Bunn said. “It’s a refresh and a re-doubling of our effort to ensure we’re fully nested in operating plans of the [U.S.] commandant commands.”

Bunn also addressed continued mission success in the current virtual environment and the “Future of Work” as one of the strategic lines of effort.

“The future work models and the future skill sets are going to ask those critical questions about, what is the way that we work?” Bunn asked. “Can you break those tasks and activities down and build out a model that has a hybrid approach to presence versus virtual capacities?”

During the visit Bunn also received a senior leader briefing on DLA Troop Support’s efforts towards “Digital Business Transformation” within three of its supply chains.

This project, a critical capability, Bunn said, emphasizes modernizing DLA’s information technology capabilities, analytics and automation, cybersecurity, and technology governance.

“Great partnership with DLA Information Operations, J6 Support, that is part of an overarching strategy that is essentially DLA business investing in itself, improving the way we do things,” Bunn said.

Another critical capability Bunn highlighted was “People & Culture,” as he addressed some of the challenges employees have experienced since the onset of COVID-19.

“We set high expectations at DLA,” Bunn said. “We’re hard on ourselves, and we expect our people to deliver. We also know that you’re at your best when you’re resilient - personally and professionally. We recognize, for the most part, our workforce has challenges outside of the workplace. So really, what I want to do is say: thanks for the work you do.”

Bunn encouraged employees to continue to do their respective jobs to the best of their abilities, support teammates and look for ways to connect with the Strategic Plan objectives.

Bunn also acknowledged the kickoff of DLA’s 60th Anniversary and recognized several employees with vice director coins.
No. 10-5677.

#### Benjamin Newman, Petitioner v. Don Redmann, Warden.

562 U.S. 934, 131 S. Ct. 335,

178 L. Ed. 2d 218,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7540.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00231

- CR

EX PARTE ALLEN D. FO STER

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- 2343

- C2A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Allen D. Foster filed an appeal of what appeared to be a writ of habeas corpus

filed simultaneously with the trial court. By letter dated August 1, 2013, the Clerk of

this Court notified Foster that his appeal was subjec t to dismissal because it appeared

the trial court had not ruled on his application for writ of habeas corpus and therefore,

there was no final, appealable order to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 44.3; 26.2. By the

same letter, the Clerk warned Foster that, unless a response showing grounds for

continuing the appeal was filed within 14 days of the date of the letter, the appeal

would be dismissed. More than 14 days have passed, and Foster has not filed aEx parte Foster Page 2

response to the Clerk’s letter. The only corresponde nce from Foster since the issuance

of the Clerk’s letter was an inquiry about his attorney on appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dism issed

Opinion delivered and filed August 2 9, 2013

Do not publish

[CR25]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Duane R. Sikes, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 873]

— Appeal from a judgment of Chautauqua County Court (Ward, J.), entered February 4, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request for substitution of counsel in the absence of a showing of good cause for the substitution *(see People v Sides,*75 NY2d 822, 824 [1990]; *People v Welch,*307 AD2d 776, 777 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 625 [2003]; *People v Youngblood,*294 AD2d 954, 955 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 704 [2002]; *People v Burgos,*291 AD2d 904 [2002], *lv denied*97 NY2d 751 [2002]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
#### The People of State of New York, Respondent, v Anibal Fuentes, Appellant.

[47 NYS3d 719]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated June 2, 2016, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act *(see*Correction Law art 6-C). *735His contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive designation as a level two sex offender is unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Gillotti,*23 NY3d 841, 861 n 5 [2014]; *People v Johnson,*11 NY3d 416, 421-422 [2008]; *People v Gonzalez,*144 AD3d 880 [2016]) and, in any event, is without merit *(see People v Uphael,*140 AD3d 1143, 1145 [2016]; *People v Sanchez,*138 AD3d 946 [2016]; *People v Rodriguez,*136 AD3d 880, 881 [2016]).

Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Chambers and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
No. 10-5441.

#### John R. Lane-El, Petitioner v. Mark Sevier, Superintendent, Miami Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 922, 131 S. Ct. 300,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7638,

178 L. Ed. 2d 195,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.