alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-245-000]


High Island Offshore System; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

June 12, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 10, 1998, High Island Offshore System 
(HIOS) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective 
August 1, 1998:

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 110
Second Revised Sheet No. 110A
Third Revised Sheet No. 110B
Second Revised Sheet No. 110C

    HIOS asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's April 16, 1998, letter order in the captioned proceeding 
regarding Order No. 587-G. Pipelines must comply with the adoption of 
Version 1.2 of the GISB standards (284.10(b)) and the standards 
regarding the posting of information on websites and retention of 
electronic information (284.10(c)(3) (ii) through (v)).
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16195 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# DLA Energy Americas welcomes Army Col. Heflin

/ Published July 2, 2020

Army Col. Raphael Heflin took command of Defense Logistics Agency Energy Americas from Acting Commander Jason Exum during a virtual ceremony in Houston, Texas, June 29.

DLA Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Jimmy Canlas presided over the ceremony remotely from the Kunkel Conference Room, McNamara Headquarters Complex, Fort Belvoir, Virginia.

“DLA Energy Americas has always been blessed with outstanding leadership and Col. Raphael Heflin is no exception,” Canlas said. “Raphael comes to us from the center of Army Logistics, the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4 in Washington, D.C., where he served as the Major End Items Division Chief for the Supply Directorate.”

Canlas described Heflin as a proven leader who brings an extraordinary combination of operational and logistical expertise to the position.

Heflin brings a wealth of experience as a previous commander for the 142nd Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, 1st Armored Division at Fort Bliss, Texas, where he led the 1,000-soldier Atlas Battalion for 23 months and deployed Soldiers to Afghanistan, Africa, Kuwait, and Turkey. He is a graduate of the Quartermaster Officer Basic Course, the Combined Logistics Captains Career Course, the Combined Arms Service Staff School, the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, the Joint and Combined Warfighting School, and Senior Service College as a Secretary of Defense Executive Fellow. 

In his speech, Heflin thanked the former DLA Energy Americas Commander, Army Col. Kevin Cotman, for ensuring a smooth and seamless transition. Cotman relinquished command to his deputy, Jason Exum, June 1.

The assumption of command ceremony is deeply rooted in military history and tradition, dating back to the reign of King Fredrick the Great, of Prussia. Due to the current COVID-19 environment, the traditional ceremony was held without the passing of the unit flag. Instead, hand salutes were rendered to publicly honor the color passing tradition.

“I will continue to nurture the positive relationships between the Americas Team and our fellow Energy and DLA organizations as well as our industry partners that help enable the first-class support to our customers,” Heflin said. “We will be inclusive and respect each other, embrace our differences, and leverage the power of diversity within the organization to develop innovative solutions to problems we will ultimately face.” 

Canlas, who took command of the DLA Energy organization on June 23, was honored to preside over the ceremony.  

“I have only been in command six days and my personal respect for the mission, performance and impact of DLA Energy continues to grow,” he said. “We have a great command team in Col. Heflin and Deputy Commander Jason Exum.”
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald Smith, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 864]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph Fabrizio, J.), rendered April 4, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-240-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Filing

June 5, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 2, 1998, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing its report of the net revenues attributable 
to the operation of its cash-in/cash-out program.
    Koch states that this filing is reflective of its annual report of 
the net revenues attributable to the operation of its cash-in/cash-out 
for the annual period, beginning April 1, 1997 to March 31, 1998. The 
report showed a negative cumulative position that will continue to be 
carried forward and applied to the next cash-in/cash-out reporting 
period as provided in Koch's tariff, Section 20.1(D) of the General 
Terms and Conditions.
    Koch states that copies of the filing has been served upon each 
affected customer, state commission and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before June 12, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15534 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Com. v. Smith

04/12/2016

547 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1049
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,629                  12,629
<SECURITIES>                                     8,072                   8,072
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,513                  37,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                       789                     789
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,049                  77,049
<PP&E>                                          36,492                  36,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,764                  10,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 788,578                 788,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,541                 132,541
<BONDS>                                        503,610                 503,610
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           336                     336
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,801                 129,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,137                 130,137
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,759                 208,107
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,096                 126,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,212                  51,136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   761                   1,223
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,087                  24,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,347)                   5,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,598)                   6,721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,097)                 (2,189)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,097)                 (2,189)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.45)                  (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)                  (0.07)

</TABLE>
No. 09-11319.

#### David Ausburn, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 873, 131 S. Ct. 177,

178 L. Ed. 2d 107,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6350.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 362 Fed. Appx. 259.
# Logistics operations director focuses on shipyard operations, fuel support during Hampton Roads visit

/ Published Aug. 17, 2022
HAMPTON ROADS, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency’s director of logistics operations toured DLA defense fuel support points and warehouses Aug. 11-12 during a trip to Hampton Roads, Virginia, to focus on fuel and Navy shipyard operations. 

Navy Rear Adm. Doug Noble, who also is also DLA’s commander of joint regional combat support, said he wanted to better understand supply, storage, and distribution standardization between Navy shipyards and the DLA activities that support them. During his visit he met with key customers including Norfolk Naval Shipyard Commander Navy Capt. Dianna Wolfson and Code 500 Supply Officer Navy Capt. Mark Garrigus for a senior leader roundtable. Code 500 is the Navy’s designation for the supply department at a naval shipyard.

“I truly value the partnership we have with the Navy through both DLA Distribution Portsmouth, Virginia, and DLA Maritime Norfolk,” he said. “As we work with our Navy partners to improve material support in the shipyards, it’s essential to see how things are working at the ground level in order to ensure strong alignment across the team.”

Navy Capt. Justin Lewis, commander of DLA Distribution Norfolk, parent command for DLA Distribution Portsmouth, walked Noble through operations supporting Norfolk Naval Shipyard, the Navy’s oldest and largest industrial facility. 

“DLA has a very unique but critical mission at Norfolk Naval Shipyard,” Lewis said. “In order to achieve ‘One Mission ... One Team,’ we collectively embrace the ‘Supply Triad,’ made up of Code 500, DLA Maritime Norfolk and DLA Distribution Portsmouth personnel. Together, we attack maintenance material requirements for some of our nation’s most valuable warfighting assets: nuclear aircraft carriers and submarines.”

Noble also got a look at DLA Energy operations at both Craney Island, the primary DFSP for Naval Station Norfolk where DLA Energy provides about 15 million gallons of jet fuel each year, and Joint Base Langley-Eustis. 

As always, Noble took time to engage with DLA and Navy employees in the area, holding a town hall in which he recognized top DLA performers and a professional development session with Navy Supply Corps officers.

“As important as operations are, they don’t happen without our people, and it’s critical for leaders to invest time in them,” he said. “It was great to see firsthand the outstanding accomplishments of the DLA team in Hampton Roads.”
No. 10-5492.

#### Ken Williams, Petitioner v. Steve Rader, Warden.

562 U.S. 925, 131 S. Ct. 308,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7419.

178 L. Ed. 2d 200,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




---



##### 



Exhibit 32 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Vince A. Elhilow, President and Chief Executive Officer and Richard D. Aldred, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Fidelity Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) each
certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the annual report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal ended December 31, 2003 and that to the best of his knowledge:  (1)
    the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations. The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. March 10, 2005
    
    /s/ Vince A. ElhilowDate
    
    President and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 10, 2005
    
    /s/ Richard D. AldredDate
    
    Executive Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

IS 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34. 

35-

36 

37 

• I • 

38 

39 

SCOTT MORRIS 

FA A OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL 

1601 L!NDAVE,SW 

RENTON, WASHINGTON 9805 7 

TELEPHONE: 425/227-1417 

FACSIMILE: 425/227-1007 

CtmRTMENTOF 

IRAMSPORTATION 

;0(jK£T OPERATION! 

JUL I _ 

*EAf?WG DOCKET 

m i JAM - 3 A W- 2b 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD 

OFFICE O F ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

ADMINISTRATOR, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Complainant 

vs. 

SkyWest Airlines, Inc., 

Respondent 

FAA Docket No. CP09NM0012 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0979 

FAA Case No. 2009NM060042 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

NOTICE OF APPEAL .';:,•:-.:.•.•• 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.233, Complainant, by and through its undersigned 

counsel, hereby submits this Notice of its intent to appeal the initial Decision of 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin, sei-ved June 24, 2011. 

DATED this 1'^ day of July, 2011. 

'if -

42 

4 3 

4 4 

4 5 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

EAA Attorney 

i;•'•'• ; i;. ' ' • ' • : 

\ ' ' • ' 

• • • '* ' ^ * i J ; • -i::!! , iO 

SkyWest Airlines-Notice of Appeal 

I'AA Docket No. CP09NM000I2/FAA Case No;;2009NM060042, 

fagc I or2 

SCOTTR. MORRIS, F/\A ATTORNEY TELi 

425.227.1417; FAX: 425.227.1007 
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

.3 0 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

33 

39 

40 

41 

42 

43 

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hert;by certify that the foregoing Notice of Appeal has been served via facsimile and Certified 

Mail - Return Receipt Requested this date, to the following: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

FAX: (202) 493-5142 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

Todd C. Emerson, Esq. 

Director, Government and Legal Affairs 

SkyWest Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 

TEL: (435)634-3530 

FAX: (435) 634-3505 

DATED this 1st day of July, 2011. 

MOIFAIR CHIN 

Office of Regional Counsel (ANM-7) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave. SW 

Renlon, WA 98057 

(425)227-2160 

SkyWesi Airlines-Notice of AppenI SCOTTR. MORRIS, EAA ATTOR^^EY TEL: 

FAA Docket No. CP09NM00012/FAA Case No. 2009NM06n042 425.227.1417; FAX: 425.227.1007 

Paiie2of2
(January 18, 2018)

#### Bernadette Douglas, Plaintiff, v Mister Sports et al., Defendants. 125 Fordham LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v Jay J. Kim, Doing Business as International *551Pursuit of New York, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, and LIG Insurance, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[67 NYS3d 629]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered November 2, 2016, which, upon renewal and re-argument, granted third-party defendant LIG Insurance’s motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated to defend or indemnify third-party plaintiff (Fordham) in the underlying personal injury action, and so declared, and denied Fordham’s motion for summary judgment declaring in its favor, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Fordham is not entitled to coverage in the underlying action under the insurance policy LIG issued to defendant International Pursuit of New York, Inc., because the conditions for coverage under the supplementary payments provision of the policy have not been satisfied *(see Rojas v New York El. & Elec. Corp.,*118 AD3d 642 [1st Dept 2014]). The provision states that if LIG defends an insured (International) in a suit, it will also defend an indemnitee of the insured who is named in the suit (Fordham), if, inter alia, “[t]he obligation to defend, or the cost of the defense of, that indemnitee, has also been assumed by the insured in the same ‘insured contract’ [lease agreement].” The lease agreement between Fordham as landlord and International as tenant requires International to indemnify Fordham for all liabilities “for which [Fordham] shall not be reimbursed by insurance.” Thus, so long as Fordham has not exhausted its own insurance, International has no obligation under the lease to provide insurance coverage for it, and, accordingly, LIG has no obligation to provide coverage for Fordham under the terms of the supplementary payments provision of the insurance policy.

Another condition for coverage under the supplementary payments provision is that there be no conflict between the insured’s interests and the indemnitee’s interests. Given the allegation in the underlying action that the plaintiff tripped and fell due to a defective sidewalk condition, the conflict of interests between International as tenant and Fordham as landlord is evident.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Sweeny, Gische, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
No. 10-5286.

#### Calvin Williams, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 913, 131 S. Ct. 271,

178 L. Ed. 2d 179,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6896.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 366.
# Scholarships available for students of current, former DLA employees

/ Published Feb. 27, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency Foundation is offering scholarships to students with a close family connection to a current or former DLA employee.

Scholarship applications will be accepted Feb. 27 through April 27 at 11:59 Eastern Standard Time and awards will be announced in June.

Up to 30 $1,500 scholarships will be awarded, as well as one $2,000 scholarship in honor of Frank Lotts for an applicant pursuing a degree in science, technology, engineering or math. Lotts was a former DLA senior executive service member who died in November 2007.

Applicants must be a U.S. citizen and the child, stepchild, grandchild, niece or nephew of a current or former DLA military or civilian employee. They must also be high school seniors or college students with a minimum 3.0 GPA who will attend an undergraduate or trade/technical school as a full-time student with at least 12 semester hours in academic year 2023-2024. Appointees to military service academies are not eligible.

Applications will be judged mainly on merit and financial need. The Free Application for Federal Student Aid Report will be used to determine financial need, and the maximum expected family contribution that will be considered is 15,000.

Detailed information and application forms are available at https://dla-foundation.org/scholarship-application-guide/.  

DLA Foundation scholarships are made possible through fundraising activities except for the Lotts scholarship, which is donor-funded. The foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization not affiliated with the Defense Department.
No. 09-11243.

#### Arnell Devon Elrod, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 869, 131 S. Ct. 167,

178 L. Ed. 2d 99,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7062.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 1.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2295

To authorize extensions of time limitations in a FERC-issued license.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 19 (legislative day, JULY 11), 1994

Mr. FORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize extensions of time limitations in a FERC-issued

license.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13

4 of the Federal Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory

5 Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC

6 project numbered 10228 (and after reasonable notice), is

7 authorized, in accordance with the good faith, due dili8 gence and public interest requirements of such section 13

9 and the Commission’s procedures under such section, to

10 extend the time required for commencement of construc11 tion for the project for up to a maximum of three consecu-
2

S 2295 IS

1 tive two-year periods. This section shall take effect for the

2 project upon the expiration of the extension (issued by the

3 Commission under such section 13) of the period required

4 for commencement of construction of such project.

Æ