alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Richmond Fire and Emergency Services ranked among the best departments in the country

/ Published Aug. 21, 2019

Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond’s Fire and Emergency Services is among the top departments in the country. The Commission on Fire Accreditation International unanimously recommended the department for accreditation through the Center for Public Safety Excellence after a hearing Aug. 9, in Atlanta, Georgia.

A press release states CFAI is dedicated to assisting the fire and emergency service agencies throughout the world in achieving excellence through self-assessment and accreditation in order to provide continuous quality improvement and the enhancement of service delivery to their communities. The CFAI process is voluntary, provides an agency with an improvement model to assess their service delivery and performance internally and then works with a team of peers from other agencies to evaluate their completed self-assessment.

Don Rodgers, fire chief, DLA Installation Management Richmond’s Fire & Emergency Services and department Training Chief/Accreditation Manager Will Hock attended the hearing.

Rodgers said he is extremely proud of the hard work put in by his team that made achieving this milestone a reality.

“This is all about continuous process improvement and meeting the needs of our customers and stakeholders. Without the support of the F&ES team and our installation management and security and emergency services leadership, we would not have achieved this designation,” he said.

Rodgers said meeting the criteria for accreditation consisted of several key documents that must be completed and maintained to include a detailed strategic plan, community risk assessment and standards of coverage documents. He said there are also 252 performance indicators of which 86 are core competencies. If any of these core competencies are not met, the department is deemed not credible and must meet them before they will even be considered for accreditation.

According to the National Fire Protection Association, in 2017, there were 29,819 fire departments in the U.S., but only 266 were CPSE accredited.

Rodgers said this is the 3rd time the department has been accredited, the first being in 2009, again in 2014 and this year. He said each accreditation period lasts five years.  

“We are part of the 9% of departments that have earned this designation. Not only has the department achieved this feat this year, we have maintained this level of effort for the past 10 years,” Rodgers said.

Hock said it can’t be underestimated, the importance of this achievement in the quest to provide the best service to those who support the nation’s warfighters.

“Accreditation is the driving force for fire departments to self-assess their processes and procedures at a holistic all-encompassing level. The process leaves no stone unturned and encourages departments to strive towards continuous improvement on all levels. In the end, this results in the public receiving the best product in the event of an emergency,” he said.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S.$

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                    3,445
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            52,183
<ALLOWANCES>                             26,226
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         31,114
<PP&E>                                    8,597
<DEPRECIATION>                            3,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          140,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     9,189
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                     18
<OTHER-SE>                               65,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            140,302
<SALES>                                  45,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         49,656
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            39,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           9,744
<INCOME-TAX>                              3,874
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       5,870
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              5,870
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.37


</TABLE>
No. 09-11094.

#### Mark Anthony Gill, Petitioner v. Missouri.

562 U.S. 861, 131 S. Ct. 141,

178 L. Ed. 2d 84,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6402.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.

*85Same case below, 300 S.W.3d 225.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14858]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Klamath Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Klamath Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on June 18 
and 19, 1998 at the Bayshore Inn Conference Room, 3500 Broadway, 
Eureka, California. On June 18, the meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and 
adjourn at 5:00 p.m. The meeting on June 19 will resume at 8:00 a.m. 
and adjourn at 3:00 p.m. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
follow-up to the joint 3PAC/SCERT meeting; (2) province fuels 
discussion; (3) watershed analysis concerns on the East Fork/Smokey 
Creek Watershed Analysis (Shasta-Trinity National Forests) and 
opportunities for doing watershed analysis differently; (4) follow-up 
on rechartering the Memorandum of Understanding for the IAC/PACs; and 
(5) public comment periods. All PAC meetings are open to the public. 
Interested citizens are encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Connie Hendryx, USDA, Klamath National Forest, 1312 Fairlane Road, 
Yreka, California 96097; telephone 530-841-4468.

    Dated: May 26, 1998.
Michael P. Lee,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 98-14858 Filed 6-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2181 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2181

To authorize the appropriation of funds for construction projects under 
   the Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
 Islands in Political Union with the United States of America, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 14 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

Mr. Johnston (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the appropriation of funds for construction projects under 
   the Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
 Islands in Political Union with the United States of America, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That the Act of March 24, 1976 (Public Law 94-241, 90 Stat. 263), as 
amended, is amended by--
            (1) adding the following section at the end thereof:
    ``Sec. 6. There are authorized to be appropriated for the 
Government of the Northern Mariana Islands for capital infrastructure 
$18,000,000 to become available on October 1, 1994, and $9,000,000 to 
become available on October 1, 1995, notwithstanding the first 
paragraph of section A of part II and section B of part III of the 
Agreement of the Special Representatives on Future Federal Financial 
Assistance for the Northern Mariana Islands, executed on December 17, 
1992: Provided, That such amounts shall become available only to the 
extent that matching funds are provided, on a project-by-project basis, 
by the Government of the Northern Mariana Islands in the amounts of 
$9,000,000 for fiscal year 1995 and $18,000,000 for fiscal year 1996. 
No funds are authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of this Act 
for any fiscal year thereafter. Such Federal assistance shall be 
provided through annual grants according to the remaining terms of such 
Agreement, except that the duration of the Agreement shall be two 
years.''; and
            (2) repealing section 4(b) upon enactment of appropriations 
        to the Secretary of the Interior for the Government of the 
        Northern Mariana Islands.

                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6095

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MALCOLM EUGENE GOLSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (CR-01-47; CA-02-774)

Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 25, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malcolm Eugene Golson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Malcolm Eugene Golson appeals the district court’s order

and opinion denying his motion to compel the Government to file a

motion for a reduction in his sentence due to substantial

assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See United

States v. Golson, Nos. CR-01-47, CA-02-774 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2005).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center, Sigonella lauds DLA Distribution Europe support to High North

/ Published March 31, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Navy Capt. Douglas MacKenzie, commanding officer of Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center in Sigonella, Italy, visited Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Europe in Germersheim, Germany, March 7. Army Lt. Col. Katie Dlugosz, and her leadership team provided a warehouse tour for MacKenzie and Navy Cmdr. Treven Feleciano, FLCSI operational officer, demonstrating the expanded support DDDE is providing to ships in Crombie, Scotland, operating in the area known as the “High North.” The tour was followed by a synchronization meeting to help ensure timely support to Crombie.

The goal of both initiatives is to reduce the logistics response time to the High North. MacKenzie gave an overview of anticipated naval expansion in the High North and impact to DDDE and the NAVSUP support units based in Crombie.

Recent changes by Distribution Headquarters’ future plans and NAVSUP to system’s sourcing logic allows some order fulfillment to be performed at DDDE, instead of traditional Navy centric depots that are further away from the warfighter. Separately, air transshipments for ships operating out of Crombie have now been routed to DDDE via the aerial port at Ramstein Air Base in Germany.

MacKenzie thanked the team for their work to date and anticipated efforts with DDDE to reduce LRT going forward. He gave every member of Dlugosz’s briefing team a coin in recognition of their support.

                Jared Biers, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution theatre consolidation and shipping point chief, left, provides information during a warehouse tour, along with Dewyain Price, DDDE warehousing chief, second from left, to Navy Capt. Douglas MacKenzie, commanding officer of Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center in Sigonella, Italy, third from left, Navy Cmdr. Treven Feleciano FLCSI operational officer, third from right, Army Lt. Col. Katie Dlugosz, DDDE commander, second from right, and Deveraux Bell, right, DDDE transportation chief March 7, 2022.                            NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center, Sigonella lauds DLA Distribution Europe support to High North                            Jared Biers, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution theatre consolidation and shipping point chief, left, provides information during a warehouse tour, along with Dewyain Price, DDDE warehousing chief, second from left, to Navy Capt. Douglas MacKenzie, commanding officer of Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center in Sigonella, Italy, third from left, Navy Cmdr. Treven Feleciano FLCSI operational officer, third from right, Army Lt. Col. Katie Dlugosz, DDDE commander, second from right, and Deveraux Bell, right, DDDE transportation chief March 7, 2022.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Distribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 220307-D-D0441-0002
No. 10-43.

#### John Sophocleus, et ux., Petitioners v. Margie Champion Todd, et al.

562 U.S. 891, 131 S. Ct. 248,

178 L. Ed. 2d 138,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6369.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 996.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15634]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-070-5101-CO12]


Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the Plateau Creek Pipeline 
Replacement Project

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Notice of availability of the Record of Decision for the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the Plateau Creek Pipeline 
Replacement project.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102 (2) (C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Grand Junction Resource Area office, 
Grand Junction District, had an Environmental Impact Statement prepared 
to address impacts of the Plateau Creek Pipeline Replacement project 
proposed by the Ute Water Conservancy District (Ute Water). The project 
is a raw water conveyance system proposed on private and public lands 
in Mesa County, Colorado to replace a deteriorated and under sized 
pipeline currently approved under BLM ROW grant C 081284.
    Copies of the Record of Decision will be available at the Mesa 
County Public Library in Grand Junction, Colorado, at the Grand 
Junction Resource Area, 2815 H Road, Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 at 
the BLM, Colorado State Office, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, 
Colorado 80215 and at the Ute Water Conservancy District, 560 25 Road, 
Grand Junction, Colorado.

DATES: The Record of Decision will be available to the public for 30 
days starting May 15, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BLM, Dave Stevens, Project Team 
Leader, (970) 244-3009.
Mark T. Morse,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-15634 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
No. 09-10923.

#### James Randall Foster, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 855, 131 S. Ct. 120,

178 L. Ed. 2d 74,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5887.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
No. 09-1384.

#### Connie Watkins, et vir, Petitioners v. City of Paragould, Arkansas, et al.

562 U.S. 831, 131 S. Ct. 103,

178 L. Ed. 2d 30,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6620.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                         
<ARTICLE>                     5
                                                    
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      292,922
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                48,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                               3,725,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
<PP&E>                                       72,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            4,831,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
<BONDS>                                   2,931,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     1,011,899
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                    696,774
<OTHER-SE>                                 (748,982)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              4,831,576
<SALES>                                   1,678,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          1,826,451
<CGS>                                     1,446,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             1,524,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           28,590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             101,933
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         101,933
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                101,933
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.04
        

</TABLE>
#### Randolph Hinds, Respondent, v Price Club, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 361]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), entered March 5, 2003, which upon, in effect, granting leave to reargue, adhered to its determination on a prior application by the plaintiff to strike the defendant’s answer as a penalty for failure to comply with disclosure, and (2) a judgment of the same court also entered March 5, 2003, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against it on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further;

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, the answer is reinstated, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a new trial and the imposition of an appropriate sanction, with costs to abide the event, and the order dated March 5, 2003, is modified accordingly.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

*586“It is well settled that an action should be resolved on the merits wherever possible, and the harsh remedy of the striking of a pleading should not be employed without a showing of a deliberate or willful refusal to disclose” *(Cruzatti v St. Mary’s Hosp.,*193 AD2d 579, 580 [1993]; *see Barth v City of New York,*294 AD2d 386 [2002]; *Herrera v City of New York,*238 AD2d 475 [1997]). Moreover, the penalty of striking an answer is extreme and should only be imposed after “a clear showing that the failure to comply with discovery demands is willful, contumacious, or in bad faith” *(Herrera v City of New York, supra*at 476 [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Brennan v McCarthy,*255 AD2d 477 [1998]).

On this record, the plaintiff did not clearly demonstrate that the defendant wilfully and contumaciously failed to comply with discovery requests and/or with the Supreme Court’s preliminary conference order with respect to the documents identified as the “floor walk sheets” and the “privileged and confidential warehouse accident report.” Therefore, the court erred in striking the defendant’s answer *(see Athanasiou v First Natl. City Bank US Corp.,*225 AD2d 726 [1996]).

However, since the trial of this action had already commenced when the documents in question were allegedly first revealed, a sanction against the defendant is warranted. Accordingly, prior to the commencement of the new trial, the Supreme Court shall determine an appropriate sanction. Santucci, J.P., McGinity, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2218 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2218

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide authorization of appropriations for the Federal Emergency 
        Food and Shelter Program for fiscal years 1995 and 1996.
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2218

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide authorization of appropriations for the Federal Emergency 
        Food and Shelter Program for fiscal years 1995 and 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 322 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 11352) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 322. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this title 
$187,560,000 for each of fiscal years 1995 and 1996.''.

            Passed the Senate August 10 (legislative day, August 8), 
      1994.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
No. 09-9972.

#### Robert Charles Hennecke, III, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 843, 131 S. Ct. 78,

178 L. Ed. 2d 50,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6044.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 590 F.3d 619.
No. 10M13.

#### Barry Stephan Townsend, Petitioner v. E. L. Sparkman, Superintendent, Mississippi Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 819, 131 S. Ct. 374,

178 L. Ed. 2d 11,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6586.

October 4, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.