alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 4.2


                           FIRST AMENDMENT TO WARRANT

         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO WARRANT (this "Amendment") is made and entered
into as of the 20th day of June 2000 by and between WORLD COMMERCE ONLINE, INC.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and ANSWERTHINK CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
("AnswerThink").

                                R E C I T A L S:

         WHEREAS, the Company has granted to AnswerThink that certain warrant
dated March 29, 2000 (the "Warrant") representing the right to purchase up to
155,000 duly authorized, validly issued, and fully-paid and nonassessable shares
of common stock of the Company; and

         WHEREAS,the Company and AnswerThink desire to amend the Warrant by
amending the Current Warrant Price (as defined in the Warrant) on the terms as
set forth herein.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for the reasons set forth hereinabove and in
consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1.    Amendment. The Current Warrant Price of a single share of Common
               Stock (as defined on page 1 of the Warrant) shall be $7.00 per
               share.

         2.    Non-Modification. The foregoing shall become a part of the
               Warrant, and except as expressly modified and amended herein,
               all of the terms and conditions of the Warrant shall remain
               unmodified and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and AnswerThink have executed this
Amendment as of the date first set forth above.



WORLD COMMERCE ONLINE, INC.                      ANSWERTHINK CONSULTING
                                                 GROUP, INC.


By: /s/ Mark E. Patten                          By: /s/ John F. Brennan
   --------------------------------                ---------------------------

Name:   Mark E. Patten                          Name:   John F. Brennan
     ------------------------------                  -------------------------

Title:  Chief Financial Officer                 Title:  Chief Financial Officer
      -----------------------------                   ------------------------
# Team Hill Frontlines: James Silverstrim

/ Published June 22, 2020

*Editor's Note: The “Team Hill Frontlines" series is a recurring feature that puts the spotlight on some of the civilian and military Airmen on the "frontlines" supporting our mission, people and families during the COVID-19 crisis.*James Silverstrim works in Ogden Defense Logistics Agency as an inventory management specialist. He is from Tunkhannock, Pennsylvania, and his hobbies include golfing, shooting, and reading.James’s experience working on the COVID-19 frontlines:"The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent transition to a virtual environment has significantly changed many aspects of my job. With cancellation of my weekly meetings with the shops I support and the shift to virtual meetings for my four monthly meetings with Air Force leadership requires a much greater emphasis on other means of communication. I find myself utilizing Skype and email much more during this time than previously. As the acting lead, this also includes maintaining open lines of communication with the other customer support specialists in our section and the schedulers for the shops we support. I’ve been able to perform our duties on the frontlines without any degradation in the quality of our service, but I look forward to returning to normal operations with face to face interaction with my customers.”James, Team Hill thanks you for your service! We appreciate you!*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Hill Air Force Base website.*
# Employee Reflection: Takeshi Sakiyama

/ Published April 19, 2022

                Property Disposal Specialist Takeshi Sakiyama of the DLA Disposition Services site in Okinawa, Japan.                            220419-D-D0441-1235                            Property Disposal Specialist Takeshi Sakiyama of the DLA Disposition Services site in Okinawa, Japan.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Courtesy photoVIRIN: 220419-D-D0441-1235**Tell us a little about yourself.**

I am a local national (Okinawan) currently working as Disposition Service Representative (DSR) and RTD specialist. I mainly serve customer service for turn-in and RTD customers. I provide Turn In 101 class and correct turn in procedure to make successfully accomplish their task. 

**How long have you worked for DLA?**

Two years.

**What do you like about DLA Disposition Services?**

DLA DS isn’t only a place for disposal of property, DLA DS offers reutilization of property. I didn’t know until I joined to DLA DS. Customers can find and request items from DLA DS site worldwide, and they ship it to you for FREE!

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction and why?**

I feel satisfaction when I assist customers and I provide correct guidance and procedures for disposal, then they could turn in their excess and/or unneeded properties without any issue.   

**What is the best piece of advice someone has given you?**

Nobody is perfect. Mistakes make people.

**What kind(s) of training and education helps your work performance in your current role?**

Property Accounting Basic (PAB) and Property Accounting Advance (PAA) training.

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?**

Turning in property to DLA DS isn’t difficult once get familiar with turn in process. That’s why we are here to support you and your team!

**Where do you see yourself five years from now?**

I will have acquired many skills, knowledge, and experience.    

**What was your first job?**

Delivery man at pizza restaurant.

**Who’s your biggest influence?**

My parents.

**Any favorite quotes?**

“Don’t find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.” - Henry Ford

**If you could choose to do anything for a day, what would it be?**

Going to a stadium to watch a soccer game.

**What’s an adventurous thing you’ve done?**

Traveling around the United States and Canada for a month by train.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-774-000]


CNG Transmission Corporation and Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation; Notice of Site Visit

June 3, 1998.
    On June 9 an 10, 1998, the Office of Pipeline Regulation staff will 
conduct a site visit, with representatives of CNG Transmission 
Corporation, of the Market Area Storage Project in Westmoreland County, 
Pennsylvania.
    All interested parties may attend. Those planning to attend must 
provide their own transportation.
    For further information, please contact Paul McKee at (202) 208-
1088.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15215 Filed 6-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### In the Matter of Cherie L. Rhynes, Appellant, v Michael Rhynes, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 771]

— Appeal from an order of Family Court, Livingston County (Alonzo, J.), entered September 10, 2002, which dismissed the petition seeking to modify an order of visitation by terminating visitation between respondent and his son.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Family Court, Livingston County, Alonzo, J. Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 115 /Tuesday, June 16, 1998 / Presidential Documents 32709

Presidential Determination No. 98–28 of June 3, 1998

Determination Under Subsection 402(d)(1) of the Trade Act

of 1974, as Amended—Continuation of Waiver Authority

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me under the Trade Act of 1974, as

amended, Public Law 93–618, 88 Stat. 1978 (hereinafter the ‘‘Act’’), I determine, pursuant to subsection 402(d)(1) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2432(d)(1),

that the further extension of the waiver authority granted by section 402

of the Act will substantially promote the objectives of section 402 of the

Act. I further determine that continuation of the waiver applicable to the

Republic of Belarus will substantially promote the objectives of section

402 of the Act.

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal

[FR Doc. 98–16138

Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, June 3, 1998.

œ–

Filed 6–15–98; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                          141641
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   494593
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                641164
<PP&E>                                         8050701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2841697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5926052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1060588
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        483140
<OTHER-SE>                                     4382324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5926052
<SALES>                                        1724497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1760515
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1636265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               32145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 125244
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             125244
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    125244
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02






</TABLE>
No. 09-10524.

#### Nathan Felder, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 845, 131 S. Ct. 86,

178 L. Ed. 2d 55,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5973.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,Darrell B. Lee, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of MOCON, Inc.;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 13, 2006

 
| /s/ Darrell B. Lee                            |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Darrell B. Lee                                |
| Chief Financial Officer and  Vice President   |
| (Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer) |

 

----
No. 09-11399.

#### Edgar Pineda Zarate, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 878, 131 S. Ct. 191,

178 L. Ed. 2d 115,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6712.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 151.
No. 10-5786.

#### Lamont Gentry Falls, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 937, 131 S. Ct. 345,

178 L. Ed. 2d 224,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7605,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
#### People v Breazil

App Div, 2d Dept: 2016 NY Slip Op 74726(U) (Kings)

dismissed 8/29/16 (Pigott, J.)
No. 09-11039.

#### Walter W. Teel, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 833, 131 S. Ct. 134,

178 L. Ed. 2d 81,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6353.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 590 F.3d 325.
2017-0165.

#### Benchmark Bank v. Kimberly Office Park, L.L.C.

Franklin App. No. 15AP-770, 2016-Ohio-8338.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nadege Auguste, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 343]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered November 17, 2014, convicting her of scheme to defraud in the first degree and grand larceny in the third degree (eight counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the prosecution established by a preponderance of the evidence that venue was proper in Kings County *(see*CPL 20.40 [1]; *People v Greenberg,*89 NY2d 553, 555-556 [1997]; *People v Ribowsky,*77 NY2d 284, 291-292 [1991]).

The defendant’s contention that the evidence supporting her convictions was legally insufficient is partially unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an indepen*735dent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe their demeanor (see *People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see *People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly discharged a sworn juror and replaced her with an alternate is also without merit. The court conducted a reasonably thorough inquiry into the juror’s unavailability and providently exercised its discretion in replacing the juror after determining that the juror would not appear within the two-hour period set forth in CPL 270.35 (2) *(see People v Jeanty,*94 NY2d 507 [2000]). The defendant’s claim regarding the constitutionality of the discharge of the juror is unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Angelo,*88 NY2d 217, 222 [1996]; *People v Ballard,*51 AD3d 1034, 1035-1036 [2008]) and, in any event, without merit (see *People v Jeanty,*94 NY2d at 517; *People v Ballard,*51 AD3d at 1036).

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, that branch of her motion which was to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 (2), based upon alleged juror misconduct (see CPL 330.40 [2] [e]; *People v Gerrara,*88 AD3d 811, 813-814 [2011]; *People v Bab Lin You,*264 AD2d 780, 780 [1999]; *People v Cervantes,*242 AD2d 730, 731 [1997]).

Leventhal, J.P., Hinds-Radix, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
# Fueling MacDill's future, one gallon at a time

/ Published Sept. 22, 2023
MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla, 
The Defense Logistics Agency and personnel assigned to MacDill Air Force Base, work hard to provide jet fuel for MacDill’s aircraft and surrounding locations near Tampa, Florida.

DLA Energy, a DLA major subordinate command, manages the Defense Department’s fuel supply chain for the five military services, 11 combatant commands, federal, state, and local agencies partners.

“DLA Energy is DOD’s single integrated material manager for all petroleum products,” said Ronnie Brock, DLA Energy quality assurance and contracting officer’s representative. “DLA owns the fuel in the transport tankers and storage tanks, and is responsible for managing the product. Only once the fuel is put into the aircraft does the purchase by the Air Force occur.”

DLA Energy provides petroleum and energy resources at more than 4,000 locations worldwide. The Defense Fuel Support Tampa area of responsibility includes MacDill AFB, Patrick AFB, Cape Canaveral, Jacksonville Air National Guard Base, Camp Blanding Joint Training Reserve, and the U.S. Coast Guard Air Station Clearwater to name a few.

Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Tampa is, a government-owned and operated by SIEGE Enterprises. All products shipped from the DFSP must be tested for quality assurance prior to delivery to the customers.

“Once the petroleum is received by vessel, SIEGE Enterprises oversees the storage, issue, accountability and quality of the product,” said Brian Sutton SIEGE Enterprises fuel distribution system operator. “The FDSO adds special additives such as fuel system icing inhibitor (FSII), corrosion inhibitor (CI), and static dissipator additives (SDA).”

Once additized, the fuel is transferred by pipeline to MacDill’s operating tanks near the flight line for use by the installation. The remainder of the DFSP customers are supplied via tank truck.

“The tanks can store approximately 6.2 million gallons of Jet A fuel and containment berm is constructed around the tanks to ensure that in case of an emergency where a tank is compromised, any spill can be contained and maintained,” said U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Spencer Brown, DLA quality assurance representative.”

Brown and Brock are responsible for overseeing the quality and technical policies, procedures, guidance, and information systems that are related to the acquisition, storage, and distribution of DLA Energy-managed fuel products within the North and Central Florida Area of Responsibility.

MacDill’s jet fuel storage personnel collaborate with DLA to coordinate fuel processing, invoicing, and testing, to ensure compliance with fuel quality and standards. They play a crucial role in supporting the 6th Air Refueling Wing's mission to accelerate global airpower and operate premier installation support.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECO ND DISTRICT OF T EXAS FORT WORTH N O

. 2

- 0 9

- 3 7 1

- C R

M A R K E D W I N H A R D E S T Y A P P E L L A N T V

. T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S S T A T E

- - - - - - - - - - - - F R O M C R I M I N A L D I S T R I C T C O U R T N O

. 4 O F T A R R A N T C O U N T Y

- - - - - - - - - - - - 

### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 1

- - - - - - - - - - - - P u r s u a n t t o a p l e a b a r g a i n , t h e t r i a l c o u r t c o n v i c t e d A p p e l l a n t M a r k E d w i n H a r d e s t y u p o n h i s p l e a o f g u i l t y t o t h e o f f e n s e o f r o b b e r

y a n d s e n t e n c e d h i m t o t w e n t y y e a r s ’ c o n f i n e m e n t

. T h e h a b i t u a l p a r a g r a p h s w e r e w a i v e d

. A p p e l l a n t f i l e d a t i m e l y n o t i c e o f a p p e a l

. T h e t r i a l c o u r t ’ s c e r t i f i c a t i o n s t a t e s t h a t t h i s i s a p l e a - b a r g a i n e d c a s e a n d
t h a t A p p e l l a n t h a s n o r i g h t o f a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , w e i n f o r m e d A p p e l l a n t ’ s

1

 S e e T e x
. R

. A p p
. P

. 4 7

. 4

.c o u n s e l a n d A p p e l l a n t b y l e t t e r o n O c t o b e r 3 0 , 2 0 0 9 , t h a t t h i s a p p e a l w a s

s u b j e c t t o d i s m i s s a l u n l e s s A p p e l l a n t o r a n y p a r t y f i l e d a r e s p o n s e s h o w i n g g r o u n d s f o r c o n t i n u i n g i t o n o r b e f o r e N o v e m b e r 9 , 2 0 0 9

. 2
I n r e s p o n s e , A p p e l l a n t f i l e d a “ M o t i o n t o A m e n d t h e N o t i c e o f A p p e a l t o C o r r e c t D e f e c t s o r I r r e g u l a r i t i e s P u r s u a n t t o T e x
. R

. A p p
. P

. 2 5

. 2 ( d )

. ” W e g r a n t
t h e m o t i o n i n p a r t a n d d e n y i t i n p a r t a n d f i l e t h e a m e n d e d n o t i c e o f a p p e a l a s

o f t h e d a t e w e r e c e i v e d i t , N o v e m b e r 6 , 2 0 0 9

. W e d e n y a l l o t h e r p e n d i n g

m o t i o n s
. T h e a m e n d e d n o t i c e o f a p p e a l d o e s n o t s h o w g r o u n d s f o r c o n t i n u i n g t h e

a p p e a l

. B e c a u s e A p p e l l a n t ’ s r e s p o n s e t o o u r i n q u i r y d o e s n o t p r e s e n t a v a l i d g r o u n d f o r c o n t i n u i n g t h i s a p p e a l i n l i g h t o f t h e t r i a l c o u r t ’ s c e r t i f i c a t i o n t h a t h e h a s n o r i g h t o f a p p e a l , w e d i s m i s s t h i s a p p e a l

. 3
P E R C U R I A M P A N E L : D A U P H I N O T , G A R D N E R , a n d W A L K E R , J J

. D O N O T P U B L I S H T e x
. R

. A p p
. P

. 4 7

. 2 ( b )
D E L I V E R E D : D e c e m b e r 1 7 , 2 0 0 9

2

 S e e T e x
. R

. A p p
. P

. 2 5

. 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) , 2 5

. 2 ( d )

.
3

 S e e T e x
. R

. A p p
. P

. 2 5

. 2 ( d ) , 4 3

. 2 ( f )

. 2