alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Gary R. DeFilippo, a Disbarred Attorney.

[53 NYS3d 834]

Motion by Gary R. DeFilippo for rein-

statement to the Bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Mr. DeFilippo was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on January 10, 2001. By opinion and order of this Court dated September 22, 2009, Mr. DeFilippo was disbarred based on his conviction of a felony, effective November 14, 2008, and his name was stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law *(see Matter of DeFilippo,*67 AD3d 178 [2009]). By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 9, 2016, Mr. DeFilippo’s motion for reinstatement was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness to investigate and report on his character and general fitness to practice law.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the report of the Committee on Character and Fitness and the exhibits annexed thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that, effective immediately, Gary R. DeFilippo is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Gary R. DeFilippo to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

Eng, P.J., Mastro, Rivera, Dillon and Leventhal JJ., concur.
# Environmental specialist marks 50 years federal service

/ Published July 2, 2020
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Norfolk-based Environmental Protection Specialist and U.S. Navy veteran Edilberto Ramirez was recently recognized for 50 years of federal service. We caught up with him and he reflected a little on his civilian and military career and shared some thoughts about what his future might hold. 

Any interesting moments you recall from your naval career? 

I made so many deployments and tours around the world throughout my entire career. The most significant one was when we were out to sea for 120 days without hitting port in Monrovia, running low and very limited on food supplies and paper products. We couldn’t even take a shower – only authorized personnel – and the rest of the crew, they took a “bird bath” due to water conservation.

**How many years have you been a federal civilian? Any deployments?**

*As of this time, I have a total of 27 [civilian] years in federal government. I started as a material examiner/identifier in a temporary position which became permanent. Ever since then, I pushed myself and started climbing up the ladder to reach my goal. I made deployments to Kuwait in 2010 and to Kandahar in 2012 as a Civilian Expeditionary Workforce member.*

**How does it feel knowing that you’ve spent half a century serving your country?**

*I feel great that I have spent most of my time in the U.S. Navy and with DLA. I will do it again if God permits me to keep on working.*

**Any plans for retirement? Anything you’d like to do?**

*No plans for retirement yet. Maybe someday I will make my decision and say ‘I quit working.’  I love my job; it’s a very challenging position and learn something new every single day. I also enjoy myself working around my coworkers and leaders. I always go above and beyond expectations.*

Congratulations Edilberto! Thank you for your decades of contribution and sacrifice as both a warfighter and a continued support resource for those who have taken up the mantle of national defense after you.

Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services and other DLA organizations located at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center in Battle Creek, Michigan. Organizational directors may submit feature request to DLA Disposition Services Public Affairs.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 115 /Tuesday, June 16, 1998 / Presidential Documents 32705

Presidential Determination No. 98–26 of June 3, 1998

Determination Under Section 402(d)(1) of the Trade Act of

1974, as Amended—Continuation of Waiver Authority

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me under the Trade Act of 1974, as

amended, Public Law 93–618, 88 Stat. 1978 (hereinafter ‘‘the Act’’), I determine, pursuant to section 402(d)(1) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2432(d)(1), that

the further extension of the waiver authority granted by section 402 of

the Act will substantially promote the objectives of section 402 of the

Act. I further determine that continuation of the waiver applicable to the

People’s Republic of China will substantially promote the objectives of section 402 of the Act.

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal

[FR Doc. 98–16136

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, June 3, 1998.

.

œ–

Filed 6–15–98; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
#### CHANNING SEABURY and Another v. ROBERT MICHAELIS.1

January 15, 1909.

Nos. 15,874—(194).

Action in the district court for Lyon county to recover from Robert Miehaelis $172.62 for goods sold and delivered, in which action Henry Meehl, the vendee of an alleged fraudulent sale of. the goods, was garnisheed. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs in the main action. The issues framed between plaintiffs and the garnishee were tried before Olsen, J., who found that plaintiff was not entitled to recover from the garnishee, Henry Meehl, and that Henry Meehl be discharged from liability as garnishee. From the judgment entered in favor of Henry Meehl, discharging him from liability as garnishee, plaintiffs appealed.

Affirmed.

*545*Patterson & Sail,*for appellants.

*Thos. E. Davis,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 119 N. W. 65.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered upon findings of fact and conclusions of law after trial by the court without a jury. The only question presented is whether the conclusions of law are sustained by the findings of fact.

The action involved the validity of a bulk sale of a stock of goods, which plaintiffs claimed was void as to creditors under section 3503, R. L. 1905-The judgment must be affirmed, under the rule of Schmitt v. Dahl, 88 Minn. 506, 93 N. W. 665, 67 L. R. A. 590, for the reason that it does not appear that plaintiffs were creditors at the time of the sale complained of, and the charge in the plaintiffs’ complaint that the sale was made to defraud creditors was found untrue by the trial court. The evidence is not returned, and no motion appears to have been made to amend the findings in the respect mentioned, and they must be deemed to be sustained by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.
Docket No: FAA-2016-3698 Dir ID 2015-NM-138-AD
Exhibit 10.1(b)


             Schedule of Secured Convertible Note (demand) Issued by
                NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on May 25, 2006



    Issue Date       Due Date           Principal         Conversion Price
    ----------       --------           ---------         ----------------
     05/25/06        Earlier of:         $550,000      Greater of:  (i) $0.0020;
                     (i) demand;                       or (ii) the par value of
                     or (ii) 11/25/06                  NCT Group, Inc.
                                                       common stock on the
                                                       date of conversion
# Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01

- 13

- 01065

- CV

Lisa Kaye Newton

v

.

SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc. d/b/a Forest Park East Funeral Home

NO. 2011

- 05614 IN THE 281ST DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS C OUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/ DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE
CLK RECORD
STATEWIDE EFILING
FILING $15.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $164.00 $20.00 $175.00 04/01/2015
06/10/2014
05/09/2014
03/27/2014
02/28/2014
01/3 0/2014
12/17/2013
12/17/2013 E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID ANT

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT



### The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are $41 4 .00.

Court costs in this case have been ta xed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine , Clerk o f the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the seal o f the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, this July 13, 2015

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**ANNE POPE CATALINE :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 2282 Disciplinary Docket No. 3**

**Board File No. C1-16-323 (Supreme Court of New Jersey,**  **D-31 September Term 2015) Attorney Registration No. 72535**  **(Out of State)**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 6 th**  **day of September, 2016, having failed to reply to this Court’s**  **directive of July 22, 2016, to provide reasons against t he imposition of reciprocal**  **discipline, Anne Pope Cataline is disbarred from the pr actice of law in this**  **Commonwealth. She shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.**
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6924** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. COLE MACHADO , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. ( 2:11

- cr - 00096

- RBS

- TEM

- 1; 2:13

- cv - 00040

- RBS )

Submitted : October 28, 2013 Decided: November 13, 2013

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Cole Machado, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cole Machado seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2013 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealabil ity will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists wou ld find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural
grou nds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and c onclude that Machado has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 09-1334.

#### Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A., Petitioner v. Harold S. Taxel, Trustee.

562 U.S. 830, 131 S. Ct. 85,

178 L. Ed. 2d 27,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6394.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 1073.
No. 09-11502.

#### Stephen M. Kessler, Petitioner v. Jeff Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

562 U.S. 884, 131 S. Ct. 391,

178 L. Ed. 2d 126,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6786.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Oregon denied.

*127Same case below, 233 Or. App. 510, 226 P.3d 130.
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip Kotze, Chief Executive Officer of Anooraq
Resources Corporation (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:  | August 19, 2008                | 
|------ | ------------------------------ | 
|       |                                | 
|       |                                | 
|       | /s/ Philip Kotze               | 
|By:    | Philip Kotze                   | 
|Title: | Acting Chief Executive Officer | 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2421 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2421

              For the relief of Rose-Marie Barbeau-Quinn.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 25 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

 Mr. Hatfield (for himself and Mr. Packwood) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              For the relief of Rose-Marie Barbeau-Quinn.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Rose-Marie 
Barbeau-Quinn shall be held and considered to have been lawfully 
admitted to the United States for permanent residence as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Rose-Marie Barbeau-
Quinn as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct 
the proper officer to reduce by one number during the current fiscal 
year the total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the 
country of the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (3)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended August 15,
2010 (the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(4)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. Hignett, Senior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary 20
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-4253

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

IGNACIO PINEDA-BERMUDEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CR-00-360)

Submitted: December 12, 2001 Decided: December 20, 2001

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David B. Freedman, WHITE & CRUMPLER, Winston-Salem, North Carolina,

for Appellant. Benjamin H. White, Jr., United States Attorney,

Steven H. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ignacio Pineda-Bermudez appeals his conviction and sentence

following his unconditional guilty plea to possession with intent

to distribute cocaine hydrochloride, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§

841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) (West 1999). Because Pineda-Bermudez waived

his right to challenge pre-trial suppression issues when he failed

to enter a conditional plea pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a)(2),

we affirm. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a)(2); United States v. Willis,

992 F.2d 489, 490 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                   Subsidiaries of Physicians' Specialty Corp.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
              Subsidiary                               State of Incorporation
              ----------                               ----------------------
         <S>                                           <C>
         PSC Management Corp.                                  Delaware
         PSC Acquisition Corp.                                 Delaware
         ENT & Allergy Associates, Inc.                        Delaware
         South Florida Otolaryngology, Inc.                    Delaware
         ENT Center of Atlanta, Inc.                           Georgia
         Atlanta ENT Center for Physicians, Inc.               Georgia
         Atlanta-AHP, Inc.                                     Georgia
         PSC Georgia Corp.                                     Georgia
         Alabama ENT Center, Inc.                              Delaware
         Green & Sacks Acquisition Corp.                       Delaware
         Chestnut ENT Acquisition Corp.                        Delaware
         ENT Associates Acquisition Corp.                      Delaware
         PSC Ambulatory Surgery, Ltd.                          Georgia
         Atlanta Audiology Associates, Inc.                    Georgia
         Atlanta Facial Plastic Surgery, Inc.                  Georgia
         Association A, Inc.                                   Florida
         Association B, Inc.                                   Florida
         Association C, Inc.                                   Florida
         Association D, Inc.                                   Florida
         Association E, Inc.                                   Florida
         Association F, Inc.                                   Florida
         New Jersey ENT Center, Inc.                           New Jersey
         Advanced Surgical Arts, Inc.                          New Jersey
         New York ENT Center IPA, Inc.                         New York
</TABLE>
No. 09-11435.

#### Larry Purnell, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 880, 131 S. Ct. 197,

178 L. Ed. 2d 119,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7076.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 25, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill III, Assistant 
Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. BB&T Corporation, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; to acquire W. 
E. Stanley & Company, Inc., Greensboro, North Carolina, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Corporate Compensation Plans of N.C., Inc., and 
Corporate Group Services, Inc., both of Greensboro, North Carolina, and 
thereby engage in employee benefits consulting services, pursuant to 
Sec.  225.28(b)(9)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 8, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15639 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
# Land and Maritime associate named to Ohio Veterans Hall of Fame

/ Published Oct. 1, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Ohio Department of Veterans Services announced the 2019 Ohio Veterans Hall of Fame class in a statement Sept. 26. Army Col. John Dreska is among 20 inductees who will be inducted in November for their post-military service and accomplishments. In addition to his military service, Dreska works for the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime as the division chief for batteries, tires and engines. 

Now in its 28th year, the Ohio Veterans Hall of Fame was established in 1992 by former Gov. George Voinovich to recognize the achievements of outstanding Ohio veterans, according to a release. Honorees over the years include former U.S. presidents, astronauts, community volunteers, safety officers, veteran advocates and government officials. 

The Class of 2019 induction is scheduled for Nov. 7. For more information, visit OhioVets.org.