alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1550]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary
[WO-220-1060-00-24 1A]


Notice of Reestablishment of the Wild Horse and Burro Advisory 
Board

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Reestablishment of the Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C. App.). Pursuant to 
Section 7 of the Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act (Pub. L. 92-
195), notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior and the 
Secretary of Agriculture are reestablishing the Wild Horse and Burro 
Advisory Board to provide advice concerning management, protection, and 
control of wild free-roaming horses and burros on the public lands 
administered by the Department of the Interior, through the Bureau of 
Land Management, and the Department of Agriculture, through the Forest 
Service.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bud C. Cribley, Wild Horse and Burro 
Program Specialist, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land 
Management, Room 314, 1620 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006, 
(202) 452-5073.

Certification

    I hereby certify that the reestablishment of the Wild Horse and 
Burro Advisory Board is necessary and in the public interest in 
connection with the Secretary of the Interior's statutory 
responsibilities to manage the lands and resources administered by the 
Bureau of Land Management.

    Dated: December 23, 1997.
Bruce Babbitt,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 98-1550 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
# DLA Distribution's Shipman rescues woman from drowning

/ Published Nov. 23, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
While on temporary duty in Copenhagen, Denmark, U.S. Marine Corps Maj. James Shipman, rescued a woman from drowning in the Inderhavnsbroen canal Oct. 25.

Shipman, a Defense Logistics Agency Distribution liaison officer to the F-35 Joint Program Office Hybrid Product Support, was taking lunch on a tour boat when he heard the skipper of the ship calling for strong men to come help. Upon getting to the front of the boat, Shipman saw a young woman below the surface of the water and the tour guide was trying to reach her hands.

Recalling his lifesaving training, Shipman knew that grabbing under the armpits would be better. He used his longer reach to grab the woman and pull her aboard. Once aboard, the ship returned to the docks where police and an ambulance were waiting.

Shipman’s quick and decisive actions are credited with saving the young woman’s life.

                U.S. Marine Corps Maj. James Shipman rescued a woman from drowning in the Inderhavnsbroen canal in Copenhagen, Denmark, by lifting her from below the surface of the water to the deck of the boat they were riding on. Shipman is credited with saving the young woman’s life.                            Maj. James Shipman, USMC, rescues woman from drowning                            U.S. Marine Corps Maj. James Shipman rescued a woman from drowning in the Inderhavnsbroen canal in Copenhagen, Denmark, by lifting her from below the surface of the water to the deck of the boat they were riding on. Shipman is credited with saving the young woman’s life.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Distribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 211119-D-D0441-0041
No. 10-208.

#### Portia Baker Andrews, Petitioner v. Associated Anesthesiologists Services, P.C.

562 U.S. 897, 131 S. Ct. 353,

178 L. Ed. 2d 148,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6295.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

*149Same case below, 991 A.2d 34.
#### People v Armstrong

2d Dept: 138 AD3d 877 (Queens)

denied 8/24/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement (Form S-8 number 333-21713) and related Prospectus pertaining to 
the 1996 Stock Option Plan for Officers and Key Employees, and related 
Prospectus pertaining to the 1996 Non-Officer Directors Stock Option Plan, of 
PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. of our report dated February 24, 1998 with 
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of PacifiCare 
Health Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 
ended December 31, 1997.


ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Los Angeles, California
March ??, 1998
exv10w16



 











EXHIBIT 10.16


FORM OF STOCK OPTION
AWARD


Date



Name

Address



Account Number: XXX-XX-ACCT



Dear (Name):



We are pleased to notify you that the Board of Directors has granted you the
following Stock Option Award.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Grant Date

	 	Granted from Mindspeed Plan
	 	Option Type
	 	Option Price
	 	Number of Options
	
 

	 	
 
	 	
 
	 	
 
	 	
 
	(Date)

	 	2003 Long-Term Incentives Plan
	 	(ISO/Non-Qualified)
	 	(Price)
	 	(Options)







This Stock Option Award (this “Award”) has been granted pursuant to, and is
controlled by: (i) the Mindspeed 2003 Long-Term Incentives Plan (the “Plan”),
(ii) the Mindspeed 2003 Long-Term Incentives Plan Stock Option Agreement Terms
and Conditions (the “Plan Terms”), and (iii) this Award. This Award may be
exercised only upon the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Plan Terms.
The Plan and the Plan Terms are incorporated into this Award as if fully set
forth herein and together they constitute one agreement.




The options may be exercised, in whole or in part (but only for a whole number
of shares) and at one time or from time to time per the vesting schedule below.
All exercises must take place at least one day prior to the expiration of the
Option. The number of shares you may purchase as of any date cannot exceed the
total number of shares vested by that date, less any shares you have previously
acquired by exercising this Option.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vesting Schedule
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Anniversary of Grant:

	 	1st
	 	2nd
	 	3rd
	 	4th
	Shares vested on and after that date:

	 	   %
	 	   %
	 	   %
	 	   %







All documents relating to this Award are available for viewing and printing on
the Human Resources Department Website. To access this information, please go
to Mindspeed MyNet, select Departments, Human Resources, Compensation, Stock
Administration. The documents available for viewing and printing at this
website location are the Plan, the Plan Terms, the most recent Company
Prospectus, Stock Option Participant Guide, and the Company’s Insider Trading
Policy. If you choose not to download these documents, if you do not have
access to Mindspeed MyNet, or if you encounter problems accessing this site,
please contact Stock Administration at (949) 579-4525 or
stock.admin@mindspeed.com to receive paper copies of these documents at no
cost. Please read all documents carefully.




If you have any questions regarding this grant, please contact Stock
Administration at (949) 579-4525.




	 	 	 
	

	 	MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	 
	 	 
	

	 	Bradley W. Yates
	

	 	SVP and Chief Administrative Officer







4000 MacArthur Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92660
#### Yessenia Damas, Respondent, v William J. Biggs, Appellant, and Netherland Gardens Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[66 NYS3d 130]

Order and interlocutory judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered on or about August 2, 2016, among other things, appointing a referee to conduct a sale of property and distribute the proceeds, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Given that the parties could not reach a settlement agreement, and physical partition would cause great prejudice to both owners, the motion court correctly directed that the cooperative unit be sold and the proceeds divided (RPAPL 915; *see Estate of Steingart v Hoffman,*33 AD3d 465, 466 [1st Dept 2006]). Shares to a cooperative unit may be partitioned under *455RPAPL article 9 *(Chiang v Chang,*137 AD2d 371 [1st Dept 1988]). Further, it is undisputed that plaintiff signed the proprietary lease and was a co-owner of shares to the unit; thus, she had a right to seek partition of the unit *(see id.; see also*RPAPL 901 [1]).

To the extent defendant co-owner of the unit raises any arguments concerning the proper division of the sales proceeds, such arguments are premature.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Kahn and Singh, JJ.
# Philadelphia-based DoD agency delivers life-saving COVID-19 medical supplies to India

/ Published May 4, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
A Philadelphia-based government agency is enabling support to India through the acquisition of medical supplies as part of the Defense Logistics Agency’s effort to help meet urgent health needs there.

DLA Troop Support, located in northeast Philadelphia, worked with interagency partners to coordinate  two shipments of supplies from Travis Air Force Base, California, April 28 and 29 that included 702,400 test kits and 84,000 N95 masks so far. A third shipment third with oxygen concentrators, additional test kits and N95 masks left April 30, and a fourth shipment is scheduled to arrive in India today. Planning is ongoing for additional flights to send more supplies.

“Within DLA, we at Troop Support have a vital mission: to support the readiness of our warfighters,” DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Gavin Lawrence said. “We’re proud to extend that support from here in Philadelphia to the people of India through our partners at [U.S. Agency for International Development].”

DLA was tasked to provide 15 million N95 masks, 1 million test kits and 704 oxygen concentrators in support of the USAID-led effort. The Embassy of India, in Washington D.C., requested assistance from the U.S. Department of State April 24 for medical supplies and equipment.

DLA’s support for medical items like this fall to the DLA Troop Support’s Medical Directorate led by Army Col. Matthew Voyles.

“Our teams of contracting, supply and tailored logistics specialists are always here to make sure our warfighters, as well as other federal and international partners have the medical equipment and supplies needed to care for their people,” Voyles said.

DLA began interagency support coordination to India last week and through the weekend to determine what it could provide, item availability and source locations, additional contracting options and timelines.

DLA Troop Support has provided over 3.5 billion items ranging from ventilators to personal protective equipment and COVID-19 test kits in support of the pandemic relief and is standing by to provide other supplies to India if directed.
No. 10-228.

#### Alejandro Godinez, aka Juan Roberto Talavera, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 897, 131 S. Ct. 359,

178 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6018.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
# DLA Disposition Services seeks to create innovation through partnerships

/ Published Oct. 1, 2022
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
                Disposition Services partnerships through innovation                            DLA Disposition Services leadership takes part in a virtual meeting at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center in Battle Creek, Michigan.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 201029-D-OS362-037The Defense Logistics Agency’s mission is to provide effective and efficient worldwide support to warfighters and its customers. Part of maintaining maximum efficiency is partnering with outside agencies and companies to foster innovation.

DLA Disposition Services is engaging with industry partners on a national level.

Collider Day was one of the ways DLA Disposition Services connected with industry partners by fostering innovation and educating partners about DLA Disposition Services and opportunities for collaboration.

“I explained DLA Disposition Services and what we do,” said Operations Deputy Director Nate Barnes. “Additionally, I shared that we have several challenges on the horizon for the organization and that we look forward to partnering with industry to either develop innovative solutions – or leverage commercially available solutions to solve those problems.”

Through this event attendees met DLA subject matter experts and learned more about the partnership opportunities the agency can provide.

“We had discussions on tires, precious metals, strategic materials and battery recycling,” Barnes said. “I believe this event opened the door for more robust interactions with industry and academia on how we can work together.”

The Collider Day was a recent example of how DLA is consistently looking to join with outside entities for new and improved ways to support the warfighter.

Another avenue is the upcoming Industry Engagement Days event allowing DLA to further collaborate with new partners. The event is scheduled to take place November 2 - 3, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:40 p.m., at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center in Battle Creek, Michigan. To register, companies should send an email to industryday@dla.mil by October 7, 2022.

During this event, industry partners will hear from DLA Disposition Services representatives on topics related to small business, operational contracting, hazardous waste disposal and public sales contracting.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOl'!t) E ~ VE D 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATioNf-:t · . • ill 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. FEB 0 9 2015 

------------------------------------~H~F~P~,R~I~N~GDOCKET In the Matter ofLaurel Avionics Company 

2013EA030023 ~ Q ! 5 - U d 0 ~ Judge Not Assigned 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States 

Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 

C.F.R. §13.204(b), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney 

listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully 

requested to be forwarded as follows:: 

Zachary M. Berman 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718 553-3258 

Facsimile: 718 995-5699 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By: 

Zach 

}J~ M. Berman 

Attorney 

Dated: L-/ ""> { ( ~ 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that on this day copies of the foregoing Notice of Appearance were placed 

in the United States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested 

addressed as follows: 

John V. Sabel 

Aviation Advisors, LLC 

2515 Minton Drive 

Moon Township, PA 15108 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

~IF FILING BY FEDERAL EXPRESS 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

- t, 2015 Date: ______ _ 

is ooks 

Paralegal Specialist 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

2
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 13

- 00256

- CR

MATTHEW RYAN JERRY VANOVER, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 28,845

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.2 

### O RDER Matthew Ryan Jerry Vanover appeals from his conviction of indecency with a child and the resulting sentence of seven years’ imprisonment. The reporter’s record in this appeal was filed January 14, 2014, and the clerk ’ s record w as filed March 19 , making the appellant ’ s brief due April 18. This Court extended the briefing deadline twice on Vanover’s motions, resulting in the current due date of June 9. Vanover has now filed a motion seeking abatement of the briefing deadline. To support his abatement request, Vanover claims that the reporter’s r ecord is incomplete. More specifically, he complains that the pre

- trial hearing was omitted from the appellate record. Vanover has requested that the omitted hearing be transcribed and filed with this Court, and he seeks an abatement of his briefing dead line until that transpires. A supplemental reporter’s record was filed with this Court on June 16, 2014, containing a transcription of the missing pre

- trial hearing. As the missing portion of the reporter’s record is now a part of the appellate record, V anover’s motion to abate his briefing deadline is overruled. Further, after reviewing Vanover’s motion and the appellate record, including the recent supplementation to the reporter’s record, we find no compelling information to convince us that this brie f requires more time to prepare. Consequently, we o rder counsel to file appel lant ’ s brief with this Court on or before June 30 , 201 4

. IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: June 17, 2014
No. 10M10.

#### Gary William Hallford, Petitioner v. California Correctional Peace Officers Association.

562 U.S. 819, 131 S. Ct. 374,

178 L. Ed. 2d 11,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6465.

October 4, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 981.
Exhibit No. 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 2 for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kevin W. Hadlock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR CORPORATION   September 19, 2011 /s/Kevin W. Hadlock Kevin W. Hadlock Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-10946.

#### Perry R. Silverman, Petitioner v. Stuart Hudson, Warden.

562 U.S. 856, 131 S. Ct. 123,

178 L. Ed. 2d 75,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6328,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

WeconsenttotheincorporationbyreferenceinRegistrationStatementsNo.333-140080and333-139500onFormS-3andRegistrationStatementsNo.333-134512,333-97903,333-91458,333-62404,and333-55438onFormS-8ofourreportsdatedMarch14,2008,relatingtotheconsolidatedfinancialstatementsofCoBizFinancialInc.andSubsidiaries,(whichreportexpressesanunqualifiedopinionandincludesanexplanatoryparagraphregardingtheCompany’sadoptionofStatementofFinancialAccountingStandardNo.123(R),Share-BasedPaymentseffectiveJanuary1,2006)andtheeffectivenessofCoBizFinancialInc.andSubsidiaries’internalcontroloverfinancialreporting,appearinginthisAnnualReportonForm10-KofCoBizFinancialInc.andSubsidiariesfortheyearendedDecember31,2007.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte &Touche LLP

 

Denver, ColoradoMarch 14, 2008

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1930 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1930

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to improve the 
     administration of claims and obligations of the Farmers Home 
                Administration, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 15 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

 Mr. Leahy (for himself and Mr. Conrad) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

             March 24 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to improve the 
     administration of claims and obligations of the Farmers Home 
                Administration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farmers Home Administration 
Improvement Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. DELINQUENT FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION OBLIGATIONS.

    Section 331 of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 
U.S.C. 1981) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(c) The Secretary may use for the prosecution or defense of any 
claim or obligation described in subsection (b)(5) the Attorney 
General, the General Counsel of the Department of Agriculture, or a 
private attorney who has entered into a contract with the Secretary.''.

                                 <all>
```