alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Bunn named new DLA vice director

/ Published Feb. 10, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Brad Bunn has been selected as the next Defense Logistics Agency vice director. He has served as the director of DLA Human Resources since 2009 and will replace Mike Scott, who will retire at the end of February.Bunn is well-suited for the role and has managed major programs and enterprise transformations at DLA and the Defense Department, DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic said in a message to senior leaders announcing the selection.“Throughout his DLA tenure, Brad has acquired a keen understanding of the DLA mission, logistics, business and financial operations, enabling him to contribute significantly to the senior leadership team’s shaping and guiding of the agency’s strategy and operations,” she said.Bunn has been a member of the senior executive service since November 2003. His contributions to DLA include overseeing the agency’s management of civilian workforce furloughs in 2013, response to Office of Personnel Management data breaches in 2015, and the myriad challenges brought about by the coronavirus pandemic. He previously served as the program executive officer for the National Security Personnel System and led the design, development and implementation of NSPS throughout the department.“I could not be more humbled and honored to be selected for this critical leadership position,” Bunn said, adding that DLA does amazing things for warfighters and the nation every day.“I’ve been extremely proud to lead an outstanding group of professionals in DLA Human Resources for the last 11 years. To have an opportunity to make a broader impact on the agency and our partners, as well as work for an exceptional leader like Vice Adm. Skubic, is exciting and one that I could not pass up,” he continued.As vice director, Bunn will provide continuity of leadership and oversight to all elements of DLA including strategic planning, operations and resource management.
#### In the Matter of Elizabeth S., Respondent, v Edgard N., Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 51]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Carol Goldstein, J.), entered on or about October 8, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, after a nonjury trial, awarded petitioner mother primary physical custody of the parties’ child, granted the parties joint legal custody, with the mother having final decision-making authority in the area of education, and granted respondent father parental access pursuant to a schedule providing for the child to stay with him for six out of every fourteen days and one week for summer vacation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*586Family Court’s determination of the custody and visitation issues has a sound and substantial basis in the record, and the father has identified no grounds to disturb the determination *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 173-174 [1982]; *Matter of Carl T. v Yajaira*A.C., 95 AD3d 640, 641 [1st Dept 2012]). The court properly considered the totality of the circumstances and the best interests of the child *(Eschbach,*56 NY2d at 171, 174). In particular, in awarding primary physical custody to the mother, the court appropriately considered that the child had been residing primarily with the mother since he was 10 months old, pursuant to the parties’ voluntary arrangement, and was thriving under that arrangement *(see Matter of Lawrence C. v Anthea P,*79 AD3d 577, 579 [1st Dept 2010]). Similarly, the visitation schedule set by the court largely adhered to the parties’ long-standing arrangement *(see Eschbach,*56 NY2d at 171; *see also Steck v Steck,*307 AD2d 819, 820 [1st Dept 2003]).

Family Court appropriately considered the evaluation of the court-appointed forensic evaluator *(see Matter of Cisse v Graham,*120 AD3d 801, 806 [2d Dept 2014], *affd*26 NY3d 1103 [2016]), who concluded that both parties were fit parents, as well all the other evidence, in reaching its conclusion.

Family Court properly awarded the parties joint legal custody with “spheres of influence,” given the parties’ acrimonious relationship *(see Trapp v Trapp,*136 AD2d 178, 181 [1st Dept 1988]; *M.R. v A.D.,*32 Misc 3d 512, 534-535 [Sup Ct, NY County 2011]). Further, the record supports the court’s determination to award the mother final decision-making authority in the area of education, given her resourceful and proactive approach to the child’s education and her demonstrated willingness to keep the father fully informed of her decision making on such issues and to solicit his input as appropriate.

We have considered the father’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
No. D-2534.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Stuart Leonard Stein.

562 U.S. 813, 131 S. Ct. 404,

178 L. Ed. 2d 269,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7614.

October 4, 2010.

Stuart Leonard Stein, of Santa Fe, New Mexico, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 10-5598.

#### Andre Applewhite, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 930, 131 S. Ct. 325,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7648.

178 L. Ed. 2d 211,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 969.
No. 12-8804.

#### Strain *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of William O. Alfaro, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 689]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 10, 2003, which denied claimant’s application to reopen a previous decision denying his request for unemployment insurance benefits.

By decision dated November 29, 2002, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment as a waiter after a disagreement with the restaurant owner over how the tips were divided on a particular night. In a decision dated February 10, 2003, the Board denied claimant’s subsequent application to reopen and reconsider its prior decision. This appeal ensued.

Inasmuch as the record establishes that claimant failed to apply for reopening of the Board’s initial decision within 30 days, claimant’s attempt to argue the merits of the November 29, 2002 decision are not subject to review by this Court *(see Matter of Woodcock [Commissioner of Labor],*298 AD2d 755 [2002], *lv dismissed*99 NY2d 610 [2003]; *Matter of Mclntire [Commissioner of Labor],*284 AD2d 703 [2001]). Furthermore, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision as claimant alleges no abuse of discretion in the Board’s denial of his application to reopen *(see id.).*

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
# New video highlights agency’s F-35 support

/ Published Aug. 9, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency’s role in sustaining the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is the subject of a new video set to premiere noon Aug. 9 at the Defense Visual Information Distribution Service.

The five-minute video features employees from DLA Headquarters, DLA Distribution and the Defense Department’s J-35 Joint Program Office.

“The F-35 is DOD’s largest acquisition program and it’s multinational,” said Air Force Col. Ty Joyce, former director of strategic business planning for DLA Logistics Operations. “It’s going to be critical to the future of America and peaceful nations’ fight.”

DLA is in its third year as the product support provider for North American Regional Warehousing in which it stores F-35 retail parts at DLA Distribution warehouses located at Air Force and Navy industrial sites. DLA Distribution centers also support global wholesale demands for the F-35 jet and propulsion systems by storing parts in support of the F-35 Global Spares Pool. 

“This leverages DLA and U.S. TRANSCOM to bring visibility and transparency into the program so that DOD has the capacity to look at the end-to-end supply chain,” says Rick Teal, who manages DLA’s F-35 Supply Chain Integration Program.

A short 59-second preview is available now.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6718

BILLY G. ASEMANI,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the U.S. Department of 

Homeland Security; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY; UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION 

SERVICES,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:10-cv-01029-RDB)

Submitted: October 29, 2010 Decided: November 19, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing as frivolous his request for adjudication of his 

naturalization application. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment 

of the district court. Asemani v. Napolitano, No. 1:10-cv01029-RDB (D. Md. May 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Georgia Fertilizer Company, a Corporation, *Appellant,*vs. P. R. Privitt, *Appellee.*

145 So. 840.

Opinion filed January 9, 1933.

Petition for rehearing denied February 6, 1933.

*R. C. Horne*and *J. M. Hearn,*for Appellant;

*Stafford Caldwell, Pettyjohn <& Adams*and *Hawthorne H. Richajt'ds,*for Appellee.

Buford, C. J.

This cause is before us on appeal from order dissolving an attachment in aid of foreclosure.

The contention is made on authority of the opinions in the eases of Alford vs. Leonard, et al., 88 Fla. 532, 102 Sou. 885, and Tilghman vs. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore, Maryland, 90 Fla. 282, 105 Sou. 823, in which former case it was said:

> ‘‘ The attachment being under the control of the Court, is not subject to attack as are Writs of Attachment at law. Proceedings for their discharge must be taken under the rules of Chancery practice. Therefore, one *597who wishes to have his property restored to him pending the foreclosure proceedings in which an attachment has issued but who does not wish to obligate himself by sureties unqualifiedly to pay the amount which may be adjudged to be due, applies to the Chancellor for an order directing the restoration of the property to him, The Chancellor having control of the Writ may in the exercise of his discretion direct such release upon whatever conditions or terms he may deem to' be equitable or just.”

This enunciation was followed in the latter case, which cited the former opinion with approval.

Chapter 8477, Acts of 1921, was an act to amend section 3405 and section 3411 R. G. S., and it amended section 3405 to provide that writs issued thereunder shall be subject to motion to dissolve as other writs of attachment.

Chapter 8477, Acts of 1921, appears not to have been referred to by this Court either in the case of Alford vs. Leonard et al. supra, or in the case of Tilghman vs. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., etc., supra, and we must, therefore, assume that this amendment was overlooked and not considered both by the attorneys for the parties in those suits and by this Court.

There is no question in our minds that the legislature was vested with full authority to determine and prescribe that writs of attachment in aid of foreclosure should be subject to motion to dissolve as are other writs of attachment. Therefore, it appears that if this amendment had been brought to the attention of the Court it would not have been disregarded.

In this case the affidavit in attachment was defective in that it did not state that the affiant “does believe” the allegations of the affidavit, but only states that “he has reason to believe. ’ ’ The failure to include the words ‘ ‘ and does believe” in the affidavit constitutes a fatal defect, making the affidavit insufficient as a basis upon which to issue the writ of attachment.

*598The record fails to show reversible error and, therefore, the order appealed from should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Ellis, J., dissents.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**

**PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Board of Directors of Anooraq Resources Corporation 

We consent to the use of our report dated March 23, 2011 on the consolidated statements of financial position of the Anooraq Resources Corporation (the “Company”) as at December 31,2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, contained in this annual report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ KPMG Inc. 

KPMG Inc. 

Johannesburg, South Africa 

March 23, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Export Administration (BXA).
    Title: Delivery Verification Certificate.
    Agency Form Number: BXA-647P.
    OMB Approval Number: 0694-0016.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection of 
information.
    Burden: 56 hours.
    Average Hours Per Response: Approximately 30 minutes for the form 
and 1 minute for recordkeeping.
    Number of Respondents: 100.
    Needs and Uses: The Delivery Verification Certificate is the result 
of an agreement between the United States and a number of other 
countries to increase the effectiveness of their respective controls 
over international trade in strategic commodities. The form is issued 
and certified by the government of the country of ultimate destination, 
at the request of the U.S. government (BXA). It is a service performed 
to honor an agreement between the U.S. Government and the other 
countries participating in this Delivery Verification procedure.
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit 
institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Victoria Baecher-Wassmer (202) 395-5871.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Victoria Baecher-Wassmer, OMB Desk Officer, (202) 395-5871, Room 
10202, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, Washington, DC 
20503.

    Dated: June 9, 1998.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 98-15807 Filed 6-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03217

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 03217\03217_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03217\03217_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 03217\03217_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03217\03217_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03217\03217_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03217\Certification Statement Plant ID 03217.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03217\Supplemental Documents\Flow Diagram 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03217\Supplemental Documents\Flow diagram WPDES copy.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03217\Supplemental Documents\one mile radius 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03217\Supplemental Documents\one mile radius.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
# Contracting and command culture take center stage during Disposition Services Senior Leadership Summit 

/ Published Oct. 27, 2022
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
The Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Senior Leadership Summit continued at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center in Battle Creek, Michigan, for a third day of discussions and team building Oct. 26 with a primary focus on end-to-end contracting and command culture.

The command’s Contracting division handles multiple mission sets within the agency and Wednesday’s audience received a breakdown of various topics falling under the contracting umbrella. Each office within Contracting was able to explain its role, highlight top accomplishments, discuss challenges and share expectations for the coming year.

Each discussion was led by a section chief, providing the audience with immediate feedback to their inquiries and allowing attendees to get answers to hot button items.                Participants take part in a break-out session during day 3 of the DLA Disposition Services Senior Leadership Summit at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center in Battle Creek, Michigan.                            Day 3 of Disposition Services Senior Leadership Summit                            Participants take part in a break-out session during day 3 of the DLA Disposition Services Senior Leadership Summit at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center in Battle Creek, Michigan.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 221027-D-AU600-201

The second primary topic of the day included the command’s culture and its impact on organizational success. Culture Team representatives addressed methods to improve the enterprise-wide culture.

Director Mike Cannon discussed the importance of maintaining a positive culture within the agency and offered his thoughts on how to maintain it.

“I want us to demonstrate our agency values and to be a caring organization,” said Cannon. “There are easy ways to recognize your people routinely and regularly that have a positive impact on culture – and we as an organization and leaders need to make sure we’re recognizing people for their accomplishments.”

The day finished up with multiple breakout sessions covering classified property processing and compliance issues as senior leaders discussed and brainstormed together in the same room rather than virtually.

“The importance of bringing everybody here in person to Battle Creek is the collaboration that takes place,” said Army Col. Andre Toussaint, the command’s deputy director. “Conversations that you get in person are not the same conversations that you get over [Microsoft] Teams or a phone call. Coming here and getting the opportunity to collaborate face to face and build partnerships, relationships, and friendships.”

Day 4 of the summit will include a demonstration of the command’s soon-to-be-adopted Warehouse Management System, among other topics.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Availability of Funds for New Retired and Senior Volunteer 
Projects--Nationwide; Correction

AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service published a 
notice in the Federal Register of April 15, 1998, (63 FR 18381) 
concerning the availability of funds to support RSVP volunteers. The 
notice contained an incorrect deadline for applications. The new 
deadline is revised as follows: ``Applications must be received by 5 
p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, June 26, 1998''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Wilson (202) 606-5000, ext. 
261.

    Dated: May 15, 1998.
Kenneth L. Klothen,
General Counsel, Corporation for National and Community Service.
[FR Doc. 98-13547 Filed 5-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
(December 21, 2017)

#### Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, Respondent, v Silvia Martin, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[65 NYS3d 715]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered March 28, 2016, which granted plaintiff’s ex parte application for a default judgment and order of reference, deemed an application by defendant Silvia *534Martin pursuant to CPLR 5704 to vacate said order, and, so considered, said order unanimously vacated, without costs, and plaintiff’s ex parte application for a default judgment and order of reference denied, without prejudice to renewal upon notice to defendant as required by CPLR 3215 (g) (1).

Defendant’s appearance in this action by counsel at three settlement conferences was acknowledged in the motion court’s settlement conference orders. As an appearing party, defendant was entitled to five days notice of the default motion (CPLR 3215 [g]; *Walker v Foreman,*104 AD3d 460 [1st Dept 2013]). Accordingly, plaintiff’s ex parte motion seeking a default judgment and order of reference should have been denied. We exercise our authority under CPLR 5704 (a) to vacate the order granting the motion, and to deny the relief requested, without prejudice to renewal upon proper notice to defendant.

Concur—■ Acosta, P.J., Tom, Webber, Gesmer and Singh, JJ.