alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-406]


Certain Lens-Fitted Film Packages; Notice of Commission 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the 
Complaint and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (ALJ's) initial determination (ID) (Order No. 5), which 
amended the complaint and notice of investigation in the above-
captioned investigation to correct the names and/or addresses of three 
respondents.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Jackson, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202-
205-3104. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on the matter can 
be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on March 
25, 1998, based on a complaint by Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. of Tokyo, 
Japan. 63 FR 14474. Twenty-seven entities were named as respondents in 
the investigation. On April 23, 1998, the Commission investigative 
attorney (IA) moved to amend the complaint and notice of investigation 
to correct the names and/or addresses of three of the respondents. The 
corrected names and addresses are as follows: Boecks Camera LLC, 9229 
West Sunset Blvd., Suite 101, Los Angeles, CA 90069; BPS Marketing, 
18642 142nd Ave., Woodinville, WA 98072; and PhilmEx LLC, 5548 
Lindbergh Lane, Bell, CA 90201. The correct information was supplied in 
the respondents' responses to the complaint and notice of 
investigation. Neither complainant nor respondents objected to the IA's 
motion.
    The ALJ issued an ID amending the complaint and notice of 
investigation on May 19, 1998 in accordance with the IA's motion. No 
petitions for review were filed.
    This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rule 210.42, 19 CFR 
210.42.
    Copies of the public version of the ALJ's ID, and all other 
nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation, 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone 202-205-2000.

    Issued: June 5, 1998.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15487 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   11-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,625,757
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,118,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                    51,000
<INVENTORY>                                    587,336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,353,031
<PP&E>                                       1,529,317
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,217,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,124,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,619,399
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,258
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,624,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,124,642
<SALES>                                      9,733,619
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,274,433
<CGS>                                        4,327,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,208,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (223,123)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             344,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,055,230)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,324,142)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (8,731,088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (8,731,088)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.79)
        

</TABLE>
No. 09-11504.

#### Cornelius L. Jones, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 884, 131 S. Ct. 210,

178 L. Ed. 2d 127,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6875.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 393 Ill. App. 3d 1115, 368 Ill. Dec. 922, 985 N.E.2d 729.
# DLA welcomes new senior enlisted leader

/ Published Aug. 12, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency welcomes Army Command Sgt. Maj. Tomeka N. O’Neal as the agency’s new senior enlisted leader. She replaces Navy Command Master Chief Shaun Brahmstead, who arrived in July 2017 and retired Aug. 11. 

O’Neal served as the Defense Commissary Agency’s senior enlisted advisor since November 2018. She represented commissary customers by raising their questions and concerns and increased awareness of commissary benefits, according to a DECA news story. 

The 30-year veteran joined the Army in 1990 as a parachute rigger and reclassified as an automated logistical specialist in 1998. She became a command sergeant major in 2007 and has held the top enlisted spot in units including the Joint Munitions and Lethality Life Cycle Command, Mission and Installation Contracting Command, 1st Infantry Division Sustainment Brigade and the 44th Medical Command. 

Her other assignments include five months in 2002 as a special operations liaison with the Joint Logistics Command in Karshi Khanabad, Uzbekistan; first sergeant of Headquarters and Headquarters Company, Special Operations Support Command from 2004 to 2006; and special staff of the U.S. Army Special Warfare Center and School in 2006.

O’Neal has a master’s degree in business administration from Trident University International and a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Campbell University. She is also a member of the Sergeant Audie Murphy Club.
# Employee reflection: John Shaughnessy

/ Published Feb. 17, 2022

                DLA Disposition Services Sierra Lead Property Disposal Specialist John Shaughnessy                            220115-D-D0441-4323                            DLA Disposition Services Sierra Lead Property Disposal Specialist John Shaughnessy            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DOD photoVIRIN: 220115-D-D0441-4323**Describe your job in a sentence or two. What do you do specifically?**

I train customers on the front end to ensure all special processing requirements are addressed [and they’re] doing it right the first time. I also work with R/T/D customers (DOD ranges/law enforcement/fire departments/states) in promoting property they may be able to use for their operations.

**How long have you worked for the federal government including military service?**

30 years.

**How long have you worked for DLA Disposition Services?**

30 years.

**What is your favorite memory with DLA Disposition Services?**

Going onto decommissioning aircraft carriers to provide disposal training.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction and why?******

Helping DOD remove obsolete and unneeded material from its records and supporting our R/T/D customers.

**What is the best piece of advice someone has given you?**

Always take care of your staff.

**What would you say has been your major contributions to your organization this year in your job?**

Supporting U.S. Army divestiture through Demilitarization as Condition of Sale at Sierra.

**What was your first job?**

Wage grade 5 material examiner and identifier at DRMO Norfolk.

**Who’s your biggest influence?**

My mother.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?**

Helping our church groups with feeding the homeless and helping troubled youth.

**What is your favorite quote?******

Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.

_____________________________________________________________

DLA Disposition Services is celebrating its 50th Anniversary by reflecting on its mission, culture, and workforce. This series is highlighting leadership and employees throughout the agency, across the globe. Visit the historical page to learn more about the MSC and its history.
160 A.3d 699

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SONIA MARINAS, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00183

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

RENE GUTIERREZ , Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court because the court reporter, Sandra Chavez , has
failed to timely file the reporter ’ s record. T he reporter ’ s record in th is cause was originally due to be filed on May 20, 2013 . The reporter has previously requested and

received three prior extensions of time to file the record , granting the reporter until
December 6, 2013 to file the record. To date, Ms. Chavez has not filed the reporter ’ s2

record.
This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further
delay and to preserve the parties ’ rights. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(a)(1). Accordingly,
this appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to th e trial court.
Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be
given and conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant has abandoned his appeal.
If it is determined that appellant has not abandoned his appeal, the court s hall further
determine if appellant ’ s attorney of record continues to represent appellant and will
diligently pursue this appeal.
The court shall further determine if the reporter ’ s record, or any part thereof, has
been lost or destroyed, and shall make appropriate findings under Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f),
if necessary. Otherwise, the court shall determine what steps are necessary to ensure
the prompt preparation of a reporter's record, and shall enter any orders required to avoid
further delay and to pres erve the parties ’ rights.
The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and orders and cause them to be
included in a supplemental clerk's record which should be submitted to the Clerk of this
Court within thirty days from the date of this order.

I T IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e 21st day of January, 2014

.
#### In the Matter of Joseph Albert R. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Joseph R., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Joshua R. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Joseph R., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[768 NYS2d 491]

In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Blass, J.), entered October 22, 2001, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, terminated his parental rights to both children on the grounds of permanent neglect and transferred custody and guardianship rights of both children to the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is reversed, on the law, without costs and disbursements, the petitions are denied, and the proceedings are dismissed.

In proceedings to terminate parental rights based on permanent neglect, the agency must establish as a threshold matter that it made diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship *(see Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368 [1984]). The diligent efforts must include reasonable attempts at providing counseling, scheduling regular visitation with the child, providing services to the parents to overcome problems which prevent the discharge of the child into their care, and forming the parents of their child’s progress *(see*Social Ser*529vices Law § 384-b [7] [f]; *Matter of Jamie M.,*63 NY2d 388 [1984]). Here, the record demonstrates that the petitioner failed to meet its initial burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that it exercised diligent efforts to strengthen the parental relationship *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a], [f]). The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing showed that the petitioner, although scheduling regular visitation and reminding the father what he needed to do in order to ensure the return of his children, failed to refer the father to services designed to address his respective needs regarding housing, employment, and parenting skills. Under these circumstances, the Family Court should have denied the petitions and dismissed the proceedings.

Further, the Family Court erred in failing to grant the father a continuance in order to allow him to present a witness establishing which services the petitioner failed to assist him in obtaining *(see Matter of Joy Cynlinda C.,*243 AD2d 631 [1997]).

The parties’ remaining contentions either are without merit or academic in light of our determination. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2

302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Debra P. Roe, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Monarch Cement
    Company;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
    of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
    the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
    statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
    by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material
    respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
    flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
    report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
    defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
    and have:

    a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
        supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
        registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
        to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
        in which this report is being prepared;

    b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
        the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
        the end of the period covered by this report based on such
        evaluation;

    c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred during the
        registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
        or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
        internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
    to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
    board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
        or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        control over financial information.


Date: November 13, 2003

                                         /s/ Debra P. Roe, CPA
                                         Debra P. Roe
                                         Chief Financial Officer and
                                         Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
No. 10-5126.

#### Robert Larson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 245,

178 L. Ed. 2d 163,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6009,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5284.

#### Victor M. Vargas, Petitioner v. Derral G. Adams, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 913, 131 S. Ct. 271,

178 L. Ed. 2d 178,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6839.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-11350.

#### Miguel Angel Fonseca, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 875, 131 S. Ct. 183,

178 L. Ed. 2d 110,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6450.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 825.
# “I enjoyed every minute of my work here”

/ Published July 29, 2022
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Sedat Deryalar spent four decades serving the U.S. and its warfighters as a part of the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services. This week, the longtime property disposal specialist bade farewell to his post at Incirlik Air Base in Turkey, and to 50 years of U.S. government service overall.

The 39th Air Base Wing crafted a short send-off video commemorating Deryalar’s lifetime of warfighter support, called “Half A Century Of Service: Saying Goodbye to Sedat.” 

In the video, Deryalar talks about the importance of his role with DLA and his hopes for the future of the office.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1555

To clarify the treatment of the Centennial Bridge, Rock Island, Illinois,

under title 23, United States Code, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 18 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Mr. SIMON (for himself, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. HARKIN, and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To clarify the treatment of the Centennial Bridge, Rock

Island, Illinois, under title 23, United States Code, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CENTENNIAL BRIDGE, ROCK

4 ISLAND, ILLINOIS, AGREEMENT.

5 For purposes of section 129(a)(6) of title 23, United

6 States Code, the agreement concerning the Centennial

7 Bridge, Rock Island, Illinois, entered into under the Act

8 entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing the city of Rock Island, Illi9 nois, or its assigns, to construct, maintain, and operate
2

•S 1555 IS

1 a toll bridge across the Mississippi River at or near Rock

2 Island, Illinois, and to a place at or near the city of Dav3 enport, Iowa’’, approved March 18, 1938 (52 Stat. 110,

4 chapter 48), shall be treated as if the agreement had been

5 entered into under section 129 of title 23, United States

6 Code, as in effect on December 17, 1991, and may be

7 modified in accordance with section 129(a)(6) of such

8 title.

Æ
EXHIBIT 21.1


                                  Subsidiaries


          Name                                            Jurisdiction
          ----                                            ------------

Hannaco Knives & Saws, Inc.                                 Delaware
IKS Canadian Knife & Saw Ltd.                               Canada
IKS Klingelnberg GmbH                                       Germany
     IKS Klingelnberg Asia Pte. Ltd.                        Singapore
     IKS Klingelnberg Far East GmbH                         Germany
          Shanghai IKS Lida Mechanical Blade Co. Ltd.       China
          Shanghai IKS Mechanical Blade Co. Ltd.            China
     IKS Messerfabrik Geringswalde GmbH                     Germany
     Rolf Meyer Company                                     Germany
IKS Mexican Holdings S.A. de C.V.                           Mexico
     International Knife and Saw de Mexico S.A. de C.V.     Mexico
International Knife and Saw Trading Corporation             U.S. Virgin Islands
P.T. Bevenmas Jaya                                          Indonesia
No. 09-11257.

#### Gregory Dew, Petitioner v. Ohio.

562 U.S. 823, 131 S. Ct. 384,

178 L. Ed. 2d 19,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6241.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 25, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.