alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2016-1707.

#### State v. Bluhm.

Franklin App. No. 15AP-938, 2016-Ohio-7126.
FILED

August 24, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

JOHN ANDERSON KINARD, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Rutherford Chancery

) No. 94DR-318

VS. )

) Appeal No.

LINDA KINARD, ) 01A01-9606-CH-00265

)

Defendant/Appellant. )

ORDER ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING

Both parties have filed petitions for rehearing in accordance with Tenn. R. App. P. 39. John

Anderson Kinard requests that this case be remanded to enable the trial court to reconsider the value

of certain marital assets and to make adjustments to the division of the marital estate and the award

for spousal support. Linda Kinard requests that this court reinstate Mr. Kinard’s pendente lite

obligation to maintain a $150,000 life insurance policy to ensure that his spousal support obligation

would be met in the event of his death.

Based upon our consideration of the petitions, our earlier opinion, and the entire record on

appeal, we have determined that Mr. Kinard’s petition for rehearing should be denied. While we did

not overlook the trial court’s award of the existing Equitable Life Insurance Policy to Mr. Kinard,

we have determined that our August 5, 1998 opinion should be modified to provide that Ms. Kinard

is entitled, at her option, either to spousal support in the amount of $2,000 per month with no

continuing interest in Mr. Kinard’s Equitable Life Insurance Policy or to spousal support in the

amount of $1,800 per month alongwithMr.Kinard’s continuing obligation to maintain the Equitable

Life Insurance Policy in effect in order to secure the payment of his spousal support obligation. Ms.

Kinard shall file with the trial court her written election between these two spousal support options

on or before October 5, 1998. 

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed that Mr. Kinard’s petition for rehearing be and

is hereby denied. It is further ordered that Ms. Kinard’s petition for rehearing be granted and that

this court’s August 5, 1998 opinion be modified in accordance with this order.
-2-

__________________________________

HENRY F. TODD, PRESIDING JUDGE

MIDDLE SECTION

__________________________________

BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE 

__________________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
No. 09-10599.

#### Clinton Black, Petitioner v. Lakeska Kelsey.

562 U.S. 847, 131 S. Ct. 92,

178 L. Ed. 2d 58,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5928.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 26, 2014

d1125 

# Order

Clerk November 26, 2014

149479

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149479

COA: 318303

Calhoun CC: 2011

- 003642

- FC

LEO DUWAYNE ACKLEY, a/k/a LEO

DUANE ACKLEY, JR., and LEO

DUWAYNE ACKLEY II,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1).

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order

addressing whether the defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel based on

trial counsel’s failure to adequately investigate the possibility of obtaining expert

testimony in support of the defense. The parties should not submit mere restatem ents of

their application papers.
14910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

NlJ SV>tOOL

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

(Docket No. FAA-2010-0S48j Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-041-AD; Amendme

39J*~*l}.~l20102'?*JD'Q

RlN 2120-AA64

Ainvorthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-700-1AIO and BD-700-1AII

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

above. This AD results [Tom mandatory continuing aiIWorthiness information (MeA!)

('" ; /0

iIlSGS'fMIlOL

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe ATE

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

Following five reported cases of balance washer screw failure on similar

RATs [ram air turbines ]/air driven generators installed on other aircraft

types, an investigation * * * detemlined that a specific batch of the screws

had a metallographic non-confonnity that increased their susceptibility to

brittle fracture. * * *

Failure of a balance washer screw can result in loss of the related balance

washer, with consequent turbine imbalance. Such imbalance could

potentially result in RAT structural failure (including blade failure), loss

of RAT electrical power and structural damage to the aircraft and, if

deployment was activated by a dual engine shutdown, could also result in

loss of hydraulic power for the night controls [and consequent reduced

ability of the flightcrew to maintain the safe flight and landing of the

airplane].

'Oln'll«; ~VM80L

'Oumrn SVMElOL

NIT1AU.SIG

IT

ImNGSV"'OOL
No. 10-5016.

#### Ryan Wesley Kuhs, Petitioner v. Arizona.

562 U.S. 899, 131 S. Ct. 228,

178 L. Ed. 2d 152,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6196.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.

Same case below, 223 Ariz. 376, 224 P.3d 192.
# DLA Energy responds to arctic weather in Texas

/ Published Feb. 25, 2021

A week of frigid weather across Texas didn’t stop Defense Logistics Agency Energy Americas East team from supplying fuel in response to the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s call for help.

The crisis was the result of two severe winter storms sweeping across the United States on Feb. 10-11 and 13-17. Texas experienced record low temperatures overwhelming the power grid creating widespread life-threating electrical and water service interruptions for days. As of Feb. 21, more than 29,000 people remained without electricity according to poweroutrage.us.

President Biden approved emergency declarations for Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas, authorizing FEMA to provide emergency protective measures for mass care and sheltering and direct federal assistance. 

FEMA issued a DLA Warning Order on Feb. 17 in preparation for fuel support for FEMA Region 6 (Texas) with 10,000 gallons of winterized diesel fuel to deliver to three different locations, said DLA Energy Americas Operations Support Director David Ray.

“This was all accomplished within 48 hours of receiving the official FEMA Mission Assignment despite rolling power outages from effects of the freezing, rain, and snow,” Ray said. “DLA Energy Americas Task Force Americas volunteers responded immediately despite enduring days without electrical power and water to their Texas homes.”  

Task Force Americas is a team of DLA Energy employees who respond to and support a variety of emergency situations under the Defense Support of Civil Authorities mission. Together with contingency fuel contractors, the team is running daily missions from the Regional Support Areas to provide gasoline and propane to hospitals, health centers and schools.

“Task Force Americas deployed ‘fuel on wheels’ teams with a contracted fleet of 46 fuel tanker trucks carrying winter grade diesel and gasoline to locations all around Texas in support of FEMA, state, and local first responders,” Ray said.

DLA FEMA Liaison Officer Bob Gagnon explained that DLA received a mission assignment to provide a total of 140,000 gallons of fuel – 70,000 winterized diesel and 70,000 gasoline – to three locations in Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio. In addition, FEMA issued three distribution orders to set up fueling points in Ennis, Tyler and Commerce, Texas.

The fuel has been on site since Saturday and is currently scheduled to remain until March 13, Gagnon said.  

“Despite significant obstacles and personal hardships, Task Force Americas exhibited great dedication, flexibility, and teamwork in support of FEMA and the state of Texas with critical fuel support,” said DLA Energy Americas Commander Army Col. Raphael Heflin. “We will continue to provide support as long as we are needed.”

A formal interagency agreement for logistics support exists between DLA and FEMA since 2005.  Annex B of the FEMA/DLA Interagency Agreement outlines the fuel support provisions between the two agencies and covers ground fuel support and services during presidentially declared national emergencies and disasters.
No. 10-5264.

#### Malik Alqadr Ihsaan, aka Roger Mayweather, Petitioner v. Timothy Wilkinson, et al.

562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 268,

178 L. Ed. 2d 176,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7268.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.A****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ending June 30, 2005, of ANR Pipeline Company(the “Company”) as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Stephen C. Beasley, President,certify (i) that the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Stephen C. Beasley           Stephen C. Beasley *Chairman of the Board and President* *(Principal Executive Officer)*August 5, 2005A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to ANR Pipeline Company andwill be retained by ANR Pipeline Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10-5066.

#### Higinio Padron Vazquez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 901, 131 S. Ct. 236,

178 L. Ed. 2d 157,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6329.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 256.
No. 09-10494.

#### Kendrick Lee, Petitioner v. Michigan.

562 U.S. 845, 131 S. Ct. 84,

178 L. Ed. 2d 54,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5826.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
#### In the Matter of Tina Blauman, Respondent, v Richard Blauman, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 584]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Brennan, J.), dated March 8, 2002, which denied the motion of Richard Blauman for the return of all weapons which he had surrendered pursuant to previous court orders, and directed that those weapons should not be returned to him.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof directing that the weapons surrendered by the appellant pursuant to previous court orders should not be returned to him; as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for the return of all weapons which he had surrendered pursuant to previous court orders, as the Family Court did not have the jurisdiction to issue an order making such a directive in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 *(cf.*Family Ct Act § 842-a [2] [b]). Likewise, the Family Court did not have the *728jurisdiction to issue an order directing that the appellant’s weapons should *not*be returned to him. The appellant’s remedy is to make an application to the officer that currently has custody of the weapons. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Allen Clouden, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 657]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered January 14, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995]; *People v Dees,*289 AD2d 415 [2001]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.
# DLA shifts major system to the cloud

/ Published March 8, 2022

The Defense Logistics Agency’s Information Operations team completed the migration of its Enterprise Resource Planning system from on-premises to the cloud in February, a move aimed at improving IT reliability and aligning DLA’s Digital-Business Transformation strategy.

Aside from potential cost advantages and the ability to scale, a cloud-based ERP allows DLA to access new capabilities as technologies evolve.

“DLA’s Strategic Plan requires we move our IT capabilities in a direction that allows the agency to be more agile and flexible to support emerging automation needs and improve efficiency and business,” said Adarryl Roberts, DLA Program Executive Officer. “Our ERP cloud approach includes SAP government trained staff which keeps the organizational strategy and knowledge within DLA. Our approach now shifts the agency’s focus to the strategic differentiators that drive actual business value.”

The DLA ERP capability serves 25,000 military and civilians across the U.S. and 28 countries, said Stacey Evans, ERP Program manager. It manages nearly 5.1 million line items via DLA’s nine supply chains for 86% of all military services repair parts and 100% of fuel and troop support consumables. In addition, it supports over 2,300 weapon systems. The capability processes over 8,000 procurement actions and 100,000 orders each day for annual sales of more than $42 billion.

“This migration culminated years of planning and preparation, involving tens of thousands of hours of effort,” Evans said. “The original projected timeline was a 24-month effort, but the team was able to complete the migration in 16 months -- eight months ahead of the original projected timeline.”

Although it was mostly a technical activity, the first of two phases of the ERP migration program were a critical step in modernizing management capabilities. ERP integrates systems used across different departments of DLA, enabling easy and uniform flow of information aided by software applications. It consists of several systems like the Enterprise Business System, Enterprise Data Warehouse, and the Governance Risk and Compliance and Advanced Planning Optimization. Capabilities include Customer Management, Product Lifecycle Management, Supply Chain Management, Configuration Management, Enterprise Portal, Financial, Procurement, Planning Integration, and Data and Reports. 

The ERP Migration roadmap now enters the final and longer phase known as ERP Transformation, essentially migrating the ERP to the next generation platform and adopting standard capability to the maximum extent possible. With the successful migration to cloud, Evans said DLA will be able to take advantage of modern, module-based technology. Leveraging module-based offerings allows DLA to take advantage of innovations such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, machine learning and other burgeoning technologies.
Exhibit 32.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Elizabeth A. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/  Elizabeth A. Murphy

Elizabeth A. Murphy
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2004

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re
Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2094 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2094

To make permanent the authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to 
       approve basic educational assistance for flight training.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 10 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

   Mr. Daschle (for himself, Mr. Ford, and Mr. Simon) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make permanent the authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to 
       approve basic educational assistance for flight training.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORITY TO APPROVE BASIC EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE 
              FOR FLIGHT TRAINING.

    (a) All-Volunteer Force Assistance.--Section 3034(d) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking out paragraph (2); and
            (2) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking out ``(1)''; and
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and 
                (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively.
    (b) Post-Vietnam Era Assistance.--Section 3241(b) of such title is 
amended--
            (1) by striking out paragraph (2); and
            (2) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking out ``(1)''; and
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and 
                (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively.
    (c) Assistance for Selected Reserve.--Section 2136(c) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking out paragraph (2); and
            (2) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking out ``(1)''; and
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and 
                (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively.

                                 <all>
```
2017-0430.

#### State ex rel. Witt v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 15AP-804, 2017-Ohio-554.
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Qwest on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q/A. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  |     |                                                                                            
|------------------------ |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | By: | /s/RICHARD C. NOTEBAERTRichard C. Notebaert
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  |     |                                                                                            
|                         |  | By: | /s/OREN G. SHAFFEROren G. Shaffer
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer                

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         188,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,004)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               206,698
<PP&E>                                          10,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,277)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,614
<BONDS>                                          1,533
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                     193,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,226
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,332
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   196
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                        57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,411
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,411
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>