alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# New leadership takes the helm  at DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan 

/ Published June 29, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Navy Capt. Horatio “Jack” Tan, Supply Corps, relinquished command of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Yokosuka, Japan, to Navy Cmdr. Ian Iliff June 23, 2022. DDYJ is a strategically located joint distribution support solution for the Western Pacific, Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf.

Under Capt. Tan’s leadership, and through the COVID-19 pandemic, DDYJ accomplished the mission while maintaining inventory accuracy, accuracy to customers and audit readiness. Tan oversaw a geographically dispersed workforce of over 300 Japanese nationals, 40 U.S. civilians, and 30 U.S. military personnel. DDYJ is responsible for more than 52,000 line items valued at over $326 million.

Taking the helm of leadership is Navy Cmdr. Ian Iliff, SC, a native of Cumberland, Maryland, and 2003 graduate of Frostburg State University, with a bachelor's degree in business finance. He earned a Master of Business Administration from Emory University, Goizueta School of Business. He also completed an executive program in leadership at University of Virginia, Darden School of Business.

His operational assignments include supply officer, USS Augusta; food service officer, assistant supply officer, HAZMAT officer, aviation stores officer, USS Bonhomme Richard; aviation stores officer, USS Eessex (LHD 2); and deputy logistics director, Joint Special Operations Task Force – Philippines.

His shore assignments include Fleet Logistics Support Officer at CTF-53, Manama, Bahrain; Navy Supply Corps Intern at Navy Supply Information Systems Activity, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania; Engines Integrated Weapons Systems Team Branch Head and E-2/C-2 IWST Director at NAVSUP Weapons System Support, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Aviation Readiness Analyst and Readiness Division Director, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations; and N41 Logistics & Readiness Director, Naval Forces Europe/Naval Forces Africa/Commander 6th Fleet.

Commander Iliff’s personal decorations include the Meritorious Service Medal, Joint Service Commendation Medal, Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal, the Navy Achievement Medal, and various campaign citations.
Exhibit 32.1

                         THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY
                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                SECTION 906
                                  OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The
Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  August 15, 2005

                                         /S/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                        Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                        President and
                                        Chairman of the Board
#### In the Matter of Reginald McFadden, Appellant, v Stephen Del Giacco, as Records Access Officer of the Office of the Inspector General, et al., Respondents.

[52 NYS3d 236]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Hard, J.), entered January 27, 2016 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition.

Judgment affirmed. No opinion.

Lynch, J.P., Devine, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2218 Referred in House (RFH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2218

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 11, 1994

    Referred to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide authorization of appropriations for the Federal Emergency 
        Food and Shelter Program for fiscal years 1995 and 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 322 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 11352) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 322. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this title 
$187,560,000 for each of fiscal years 1995 and 1996.''.

            Passed the Senate August 10 (legislative day, August 8), 
      1994.

            Attest:

                                                MARTHA S. POPE,

                                                             Secretary.
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

RAYMOND JUAREZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-16145 

D.C. Nos.

2:16-cv-01376-JCM 

2:11-cr-00091-JCM-CWH-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. 

Raymond Juarez appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Reviewing de novo, see United States v. Hill, 

915 F.3d 669, 673 (9th Cir. 2019), we affirm. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-16145 

Juarez contends that his conviction and sentence for violating 18 U.S.C. 

§ 924(c) must be vacated because Hobbs Act robbery based on an aiding and 

abetting theory of liability is not a qualifying predicate crime of violence. We need 

not address this argument because we agree with the government that Juarez’s 

§ 2255 motion is barred by the collateral attack waiver in his plea agreement. 

Juarez contends that the waiver is not enforceable because his challenge to his 

§ 924(c) conviction and sentence falls within the illegal sentence exception

recognized in United States v. Torres, 828 F.3d 1113, 1125 (9th Cir. 2016). 

However, this exception does not apply where, as in this case, the contention is that 

the conviction is illegal. See United States v. Goodall, 21 F.4th 555, 562-65 (9th 

Cir. 2021) (holding that the illegal sentence exception to appellate waivers does not 

apply to challenges to illegal convictions). Because the collateral attack waiver 

forecloses § 2255 relief, we affirm the denial of Juarez’s motion. See White v. 

Klitzkie, 281 F.3d 920, 922 (9th Cir. 2002) (“[W]e can affirm the district court on 

any ground supported by the record.”).

We treat Juarez’s additional argument as a motion to expand the certificate 

of appealability. So treated, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 22-1(e); Hiivala 

v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999). 

AFFIRMED.
No. 09-11007.

#### Hassan Butler, Petitioner v. Gregory Schwartz, Warden.

562 U.S. 858, 131 S. Ct. 130,

178 L. Ed. 2d 79,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5920.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00330- CR

Gr egory Har old Oak es, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 264 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 686 02, H ONO RAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N P ER CURIAM

Gre g ory Har old Oake s plead g uilty to the offe nse of possession of fi v e p o unds or less but more than four ounce s of marijuana in a drug -fr ee zone, and the t rial court sentenc ed him to five y ear s’ imprisonment. See Tex. Hea lth & Safety Code An n . § 4 8 1
. 1 2 1 (West 2010). This appea l followed. Appellant’s appointed counsel, Mr. W.W
. Torre y , has filed a motion to withdraw
acc ompanied b y a brief concluding that this appea l is frivolous and without merit. See Anders

v. Calif ornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Howeve r, befor e counsel filed his Anders brief, he was elec ted the District Attorney of Milam County , and his term commence d eff ective J anuar

y 1, 2013. I n simil ar case s involving Mr. Torre y , this Court has abate d the appea l and rema nded the cause to the trial court f

or consider ation of whe ther c ounsel should be allowed to withdra w. 1

See Parker v. State , No. 03-12-00540- CR, 2013 Tex. App. L E XIS 1 5 87, at *1-2 1 (Tex. App.—Austin Fe b. 20, 2013, no pet. h.) (per curia m) (not desig nated for publication);We will do the same here
. I f the district cour t determines that g ood cause exis ts to relieve counsel of his duties and repla ce him with substitut e counsel, the district c ourt shall permit counsel to withdraw and promptly appoint substitut e counse l for the a ppeal of this cause . A copy of the cour

t’ s o r d e r a p p o inting substitut e counsel and the court’s order g ranting counsel’s withdrawa l shall be for

war ded to this Court no later than Mar ch 28, 2013. The Anders brief that Mr. Torre y submitt ed has been marke d “re ceive d” but will not be filed until such time as substitut e counsel files the re q u i re d ce rt ificate of compliance with the newly enac ted Rule 9.4 reg arding the leng th of briefs. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(3)
. Wit hin thirty day s of appoint ment, substitut e counsel shall file an amende d brief with the Rule 9.4
cer tification and such othe r ame ndments as new c ounsel dee ms appropriate.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose Abated Filed: Mar ch 13, 2013 Do Not Publish

W illiamson v. State , No. 03-12-00672- CR, 2013 Tex. App. L EXI S 811, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin J an. 25, 2013, no pet. h.) (not desig nated for publication); Smalls v. State , No. 03-12-00241- CR, 2013 Tex. App. L EXI S 729, at *1-2 (Tex. A pp.—Austin Jan. 25, 2013, no pet. h.) (not desig nated for publication).
2
No. 09-10762.

#### Mark Davis, Petitioner v. Kanawha County Board of Education.

562 U.S. 851, 131 S. Ct. 107,

178 L. Ed. 2d 65,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5943.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 515.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Carter, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 471]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lopresto, J.), rendered August 12, 2013, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted of selling oxycodone pills to his codefendant, Kevin Leland. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the postarrest written statement of Leland was not shown to be against Leland’s penal interest, as it was largely exculpatory *(see People v Singh,*47 AD3d 733, 734 [2008]). Therefore, the statement was properly excluded as inadmissible hearsay. Since the statement was properly excluded as inadmissible hearsay, the defendant’s contention that exclusion of the statement violated his constitutional right to present a defense is without merit *(see People v Simmons,*84 AD3d 1120 [2011]; *People v Cepeda,*208 AD2d 364 [1994]).

The defendant’s contention that certain comments made by the prosecutor during summation deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review, as defense counsel either did not object to the challenged remarks or made only general objections *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Alvarado,*126 AD3d 803, 805 [2015]; *People v Taylor,*120 AD3d 519, 520 [2014]). In any event, the challenged summation remarks were fair comment on the evidence, constituted a fair response to defense counsel’s summation, or otherwise do not warrant reversal *(see People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396, 399 [1981]; *People v Johnson,*127 AD3d 785, 786 [2015]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Chambers, J.R, Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
#### Iolanta Campolongo, Plaintiff, v Sergio Campolongo, Appellant. Irwin Weisberg, Nonparty Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 498]

In a. matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated November 16, 2001, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fitzmaurice, J.), dated September 19, 2002, as granted those branches of the Law Guardian’s motion which were to disqualify the defendant’s attorney and preclude the defendant from using a psychiatrist’s report and testimony as evidence in the pending custody dispute.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that the disqualification of an attorney is a matter which rests within the sound discretion of the court (see *Olmoz v Town of Fishkill,*258 AD2d 447 [1999]; *Fischer v Deitsch,*168 AD2d 599 [1990]). A party’s entitlement to be represented in ongoing litigation by counsel of his or her own choosing is a valued right which should not be abridged absent a clear showing that disqualification is warranted *(see Olmoz v Town of Fishkill, supra),*and the movant bears the burden on the motion (see *Tekni-Plex, Inc. v Meyner & Landis,*89 NY2d 123, 131 [1996]; *Solow v Grace & Co.,*83 NY2d 303, 308 [1994]; *S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp.,*69 NY2d 437, 445 [1987]).

Here, the defendant’s attorney violated Code of Professional Responsibility DR 7-104 (A) (1) (see 22 NYCRR 1200.35 [a] [1]) by allowing a psychiatrist, that he caused the defendant father to retain, to interview the subject child regarding the pending custody dispute and to prepare a report without the Law Guardian’s knowledge and consent. The appointment of a Law Guardian to protect the interests of a child creates an attorney-client relationship, and the absence of the Law Guardian at the subject interview constituted a denial of the child’s due process rights *(see Matter of Samuel H.,*208 AD2d 746, 747 [1994]; *see*
      *477
      *also*Family Ct Act § 241). Further, while the Supreme Court previously appointed a psychologist to conduct a forensic examination of the child and the parties herein, the defendant’s attorney failed to seek court permission for an additional forensic evaluation, and also failed to inform the attorney for the plaintiff of the interview by the defendant’s psychiatrist.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting those branches of the Law Guardian’s motion which were to disqualify the defendant’s attorney and to preclude him from using the psychiatrist’s report and testimony as evidence in the pending custody dispute. Friedmann, J.P., H. Miller, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
No. 10-19.

#### Christopher Winn, et al., Petitioners v. Alamo Title Insurance Company, et al.

562 U.S. 890, 131 S. Ct. 225,

178 L. Ed. 2d 136,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6905.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 461.
No. 10-5187.

#### Anthony Eugene Lewis, Petitioner v. Stephen D. Sinclair, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.

562 U.S. 908, 131 S. Ct. 256,

178 L. Ed. 2d 169,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6996.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 12-8907.

#### Stephens et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
San Joaquin’s Ruiz selected as DLA Top Ten Employee
 
  By  Annette Silva, DLA Distribution San Joaquin Public Affairs
  Jennifer Ruiz, Base Supply process worker at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution San Joaquin, California, was named a DLA Top Ten Employee. Her extensive subject matter expertise and ability to work well with others, exemplary relationships with all internal and external customers, managers and employees led to her selection. Ruiz was responsible for processing COVID-19 related cleaning and sanitizing material. She took charge of the pandemic related workload and ensured cleaning and sanitation agents were received into the base supply system and expeditiously delivered the items to customers Aside from her primary duties, she went above and beyond in assisting her co-workers with offloading conveyances, customer deliveries, and material expediting, as well as serving as our problem resolution liaison to customers. Further, she was instrumental in her ability to receive, process and deliver the customer’s Direct Turnover Orders by meticulously matching documentation to received material, resulted in an environment of audit sustainment and excellent resource stewardship. Ruiz is a true safety champion. She contributed her ideas to the base supply office system design and her input ensured all social distancing requirements were met, while improving the flow of work and communications. Her feedback following a test and evaluation of the layout for workstations, validated assumptions that the system would help mitigate the spread of COVID-19, while maintaining functionality and capability of the old design. To recognize exceptional employees for their performance, she executed a workload production report that accurately captured employees’ processing and production times, lines per hour totals and both efficiency and effectiveness ratings. This initiative allowed leadership to accurately track each employee’s performance and was key to a new employee incentive program being implemented. Ruiz is an exceptional processor of material. She contributed to improving material throughput by nearly 10%. This was critical to the surge associated with the COVID-19 response and uptick in demands supporting new business. “Ms. Ruiz’s outstanding contributions in support of our nation’s warfighters and for her demonstrated commitment to DLA’s goal of delivering Global Distribution Excellence led to her selection as one of DLA’s Top Ten Employees,” said her supervisor Jesus Lopez. “Jennifer took pride and personal responsibility in her daily work and always outperformed her daily production requirements, setting the standard for all Base Supply employees.”
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-11-0636 SAT Date: 9/23/2011 Print Date: 11/1/2011

Related cases : CBI : Yes Health related cases: Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 PMN 3 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Hyd Pdt negl
Keywords : Keywords: ONCO; MUTA; SENS-L,S; IRR-L,MM
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-11-0635-636 FATE: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) S = Reacts Hydrolysis half-life = hr VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90-99 via hydrolysis; then 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg ≥ moSorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P3B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption of low molecular weight fractions is poor all routes ( p che m ); expected to react, especially in the lung. Concern for oncogenicity based on mutagenicity based on respiratory and dermal sensitization and lung and mucous membrane irritation based on the moiety for the low molecular weight fractions.

Ecotox :

Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value * algal

_ chronic value * Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value

_ Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; ecotox chemical class: p olyme r -nonionic p H 7; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; 100% active ingredients; mean measured concentrations; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs nonionic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -nonionic

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
# 2021 DLA Hall of Fame inductees announced

/ Published Aug. 10, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic has announced inductees into the 2021 DLA Hall of Fame. 

“The DLA Hall of Fame recognizes former DLA civilian and military team members who made significant and lasting contributions to this agency and its mission and represent the core DLA values and ideals we strive to uphold today,” Skubic wrote in a memo to DLA senior leaders.

Inductees are:
      - Denise Canada, former technical quality senior advisor, DLA Aviation;
      - Christos Cosfol, former deputy director, procurement process support, DLA Troop Support;
      - Thomas Legeret, former director, disposal operations, DLA Disposition Services;
      - James McClaugherty, former deputy commander, DLA Land and Maritime; and 
      - Stephen Sherman, former director, DLA Document Services.

Barring COVID-19 restrictions, the honorees will be inducted 10 a.m. Oct.7 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex on Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Information on previous inductees is available at the DLA Hall of Fame webpage.