alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2076 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2076

To prohibit the departments and agencies of the Federal Government from 
 requiring that any State, or political subdivision thereof, utilize a 
                     metric system of measurement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 4 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

  Mr. Dorgan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the departments and agencies of the Federal Government from 
 requiring that any State, or political subdivision thereof, utilize a 
                     metric system of measurement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON REQUIREMENT OF UTILIZATION OF METRIC SYSTEM.

    (a) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
department, agency, or other entity of the Federal Government may 
require that any State, or political subdivision thereof, utilize a 
metric system of measurement.
    (b) Effective Date.--The prohibition set forth in subsection (a) 
shall take effect on October 1, 1995.

                                 <all>
```
#### J. W. Adderly, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

145 So. 191.

Decision filed December 20, 1932.

*George M. O’Kell*and *Roger Edward Davis,*Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error;

*Gary D. Landis,*Attorney General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Brown, J., dissents.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

p0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140913

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140913 COA: 294253 Oakland CC: 2003-188712-FC GEORGE HENRY REED, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 16, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
To: Federal Aviation Administration

From: Jesse Werle
Subject: Petition to Amend Exemption No. 13612

Date: 30 November 2015
This letter is to create an amendment to the current FAA Section 333 Exemption granted to Jesse Werle granted on the 16 day of November 2015. The Exemption Number is 13612 , and the Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 3761 . I would like to amend the following attributes : Filming in closed set movie or television production

Jesse Werle has extensive video and film production experience and would like to be able to use UASs for such purposes as called out in the 333 exemption. It is therefore reque sting relief from restriction on the 333 exemption for operation in closed set environments for movie and te levision pr oduction. Jesse Werle ’ s proprietary Motion Picture and Televi sion Flight Operations for Unmanned Aerial Systems will be mailed directly to 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Jesse Werle
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4656

_____________________________

CHRISHON ALFREDO NOBLES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

W. Joel Boles, Judge.

May 7, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# Culture Climate Survey starts Oct. 9

/ Published Sept. 24, 2020

Civilians, military and local nationals, let your voices be heard!  Defense Logistics Agency is launching its 2020 Denison Culture Climate survey Oct. 9.

The survey, which measures employee perceptions of agency culture, is used to improve culture to improve performance. 

“I encourage the entire Energy workforce to participate in the forthcoming DLA 2020 Culture Climate Survey,” said DLA Energy Deputy Commander Eric Smith. “Our goal is 100% participation within DLA Energy.”

Employees should begin receiving the email invitation on Oct. 9 and the survey will be available until Nov. 13. 

Since 2003, DLA has used the survey to assess the culture of the workforce and provide a confidential avenue for employees to share their anonymous feedback on their work environment. The results of the survey provide DLA the opportunity to engage employees and leaders in thoughtful, data-driven discussions that lead to informed action and improved culture and performance.

Following the results of the 2018 Denison Survey, a 2019 Culture Action Plan was created and three culture climate teams were formed. Initiatives included efforts to increase organizational communication, improve professional development opportunities, and link performance and recognition to organizational goals and performance based action.

As a result of the culture climate teams’ efforts, six Energy 101 overview courses were presented, 95% of Energy employees achieved approved Individual Development Plans and six employees participated in the Energy developmental opportunities.

Other successes included a 10% increase in professional development applications and a 10% increase in internal rotational assignments.

“The survey takes only 30-45 minutes to complete,” said DLA Energy Culture Climate Champion Drake Utley. “Supervisors are instructed to allow employees time to complete the survey during the workday.”

This year’s theme is “Your Voice is Our Future” and previous DLA Culture/Climate Survey results led to:
      - DLA Enterprise Leader Development Program 
      - Multi-source feedback (360) assessments for leaders
      - Recognition programs (e.g., Strategic Goals Awards)
      - New/expanded work-life programs (e.g., fitness and telework programs)

Why would you not want to participate? DLA Energy’s past success stories show employees the value of completing the survey, emphasizing that their ideas matter, Utley said. 

“The sense of ownership and commitment inherent in the phrase ‘Your Voice is Our Future’ should become ingrained, allowing DLA culture to grow and improve,” Smith said. “Your candid feedback counts and can make a positive difference!”  

Watch for the survey link in your email and let your voice be heard to help make DLA Energy an even better place to work.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Desroy Clarke, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 877]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 12, 2012 *(People v Clarke,*101 AD3d 897 [2012]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered August 18, 2005.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*
      *1258463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
No. 09-11287.

#### Kenneth Wayne Crowder, Petitioner v. Keith L. Davis, Warden.

562 U.S. 872, 131 S. Ct. 173,

178 L. Ed. 2d 103,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7005.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 554.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 number 333-21713) and related Prospectus pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option
Plan for Officers and Key Employees and the related Prospectus pertaining to the
1996 Non-Officer Directors Stock Option Plan of PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 number 333-48377) and related
Prospectus pertaining to the 1997 Premium Priced Stock Option Plan and the
related Prospectus pertaining to the Amendment and Restatement of the PacifiCare
Health Systems, Inc. Savings and Profit-Sharing Plan of PacifiCare Health
Systems, Inc. of our report dated February 9, 1999 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of PacifiCare Health Systems,
Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 1998.
    
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
   
March 26, 1999
#### Finn, Matter of, v City of New York

1st Dept: 141 AD3d 436

denied
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14992]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1217-DR]


Indiana; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Indiana, (FEMA-1217-DR), dated May 8, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 28, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Indiana, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of May 8, 1998:

    Benton, Newton, Pulaski, Saint Joseph, and Starke Counties for 
Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-14992 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit
10.38




DESCRIPTION
OF FISCAL 2010 EXECUTIVE BONUS PROGRAM





On May
11, 2009, Micrus Endovascular Corporation implemented a Bonus Program for
certain executive and senior employees, including its named executive
officers.  Under the Bonus Program, each named executive officer may
receive a bonus payment equal to up to 16.5% of his or her base salary for
fiscal year 2010.  The payment is conditioned upon both the
achievement of three specific corporate objectives and approval of the payment
by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.  The
objectives are achievement of a specific revenue target for fiscal year 2010;
positive earnings per share for fiscal year 2010; and positive cash flow for
fiscal year 2010. All objectives must be met in order for a bonus payment to be
made, and payment will be subject to the discretion of the Compensation
Committee even if the bonus criteria are met.  Bonuses, if any, will
be paid during fiscal year 2011.  The Bonus Program replaces the
Employee Cash Bonus Plan under which the Company’s executives were eligible for
bonus payments during prior fiscal years.
. . 

; 

a... 

.-. -.. 

? 

‘. 

t%g 

, 

: 

OFFICE 6F THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

. . 

, 

aaru, 0. MANN 

A-- *’ . 

I 

HoAOrabla A. B. Dunlap, Xembef 

Board oi Xatsr X.ngineers 

duet& !l"sxaa 

Dear Sirt . 

_ 

. 

iI oontained in the 

0 Dspartmntal Appro11, S. 8. 423, Aots 

pro suoh lhitatiOA8 are plaaed UPOA the mOA6yS aDproyogzIby Eouse, Bill,?. 739. Sootion 6 of said Aot reads es 

wsSat3t iOA 6. There Is hereby appropriated out 

of any funI in the 3tate Tresaury not otherwise 

appropriated the swn of Thirty Thousand Dollars~ 

($30,000.00), ror the purpose of carrylm Out the 
* 

i 

I 

~ooorabl4 A. E.'Dodlap Y &go I. 

. . . 

protleiona Of this Aot. Said money ahall. be paid 

Out OA SWO2A accounts approved by the Attorney C~sAaral and shall ba paid out OS the Stat8 Treasury oh 

yfirranto or the aoaptrollsr 88, under Csasral Lawa. 

It ie Our OpiAiOA that the linitatlons up&A travslisig eXpOA868 0OAttliASd iA the rider t0 S0A3te Dill ;$I& 123 

apply only t0 ths appropriationa aade by ssid bill; oo~mqaontly they do not apply to tha ‘appropriation undo by Bouse .’ 

Bill Its. 739. 

to ~&tiolo 

?A this 4QAA4OtiOA We Oail iOur att&tiOA htwetiq 

6823, reviled civil statutes of FOX~~I, 1925, BB, 

aaenttsd by Chapter 216, page 37;!,~ Aots 1931, &WI Legislature, 

mhioh reads as followst 

wTha traveling aAd,other neoasaarg axpe~ses 

lnourrt?d by tha various of':ioexs, assistants, 'dsp- 

‘. UtiOS, oierka aAd ,uth,sr 4r@~$944 in the VariOus 

dspartmnta, inatltutlons, boards, oomzisaione or 

other subdivisions ot the Stat4 G-avernmznt, in the 

aotive dlsoharge of their duties shall be ~such a8 

are spsoifioaLly~f~xed and appr~oniatad by tha tegls~ 

lature IA the .&were1 approprlatlon bills providing 

tq ~tho.expeAkea of .th4 State Cavrerntinent fxom ysar 

to y0a.r. 'rihen appropr~atlons fox trevel2ng 6xpGtlses. 

ar4 meas any ellow3kosar or payzonts to oifioials or 

bmploye4s Sor th4 use of privately ommd aatoolobllse 

shall be 6~ a beaie of eotuel nileago traveled iOr 

aach trlp or all tripa oovewd by the 4xp4nss amounts 

eubtittcd for payneAt, or rllvwanoa front euah spproprla$ions, aud, suoh payment or allbwanoe shall bo 

made at a rate not to oxceed five (%I cents for 

ea4h Aile ootuallg trevelad, and no additional axp4n44 iACiaQAt to ths OperQtioA or auoh automobile 

shill b4 allOwed.', 

W4 d0 not bsllsoa that the flret eentsnao of thie 

Bbttlte ptwprsrta to inoorporate by refemmcs the llnltations 

upon traveling ;expensea whlah Aay ba containad in t&o Depertmental Approgrfatloa Bill or any other general appropriation 

bill iAt4 Oth~4r appropriations whorsla auah limitations are 

not expressly oontained. 2,:;;'~ do believe however that the 

llmftati0A Of 5 04AtS per mile,for th4 use of p*ivatoly -*a 
aat~~blle8 applles p,enarally as a lknitation upon ail traveling exgenasa lrrespeotlve of whether such a lltitatlon is 8x0 . 

presaly.oontained. in the partioular appropriation bill. 

Truetlng that the forsgolng answer8 your inquiry, 

we are 

fours very truly 

ATT0Rm-Y CS~OP TRXAS 

Walter R. Iiooh 

.' Assistant 

ATTORNEY GEEEBAL QP TEXAS
No. 10-5268.

#### Solomon Ben-Tov Cohen, Petitioner v. Steve Hodges, Inspector, United States Postal Service, et al.

562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 268,

178 L. Ed. 2d 177,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7392.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 953.
# Employees wanted for rapid deployment team positions

/ Published June 24, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Volunteers are needed to fill deputy commander, operations officer and support team roles for three Defense Logistics Agency Rapid Deployment Teams that will deploy on short notice to assist military and federal agencies during international emergencies and contingencies.

Volunteers will serve for one year and must have a broad knowledge of DLA, said Sabrina Viruet, DLA Logistics Operations deputy of deployment support.

Deputy commanders are in GS-14 positions who provide leadership and guidance to RDT members in the commander’s absence. Operations officers are GS-13s who ensure daily logistics support is provided where it’s needed and serve as the main contact for deployed units.

DLA Logistics Operations is recruiting agencywide within the continental U.S. for the 13-member teams, which also include subject matter experts from DLA major subordinate commands and expeditionary contracting officers as well as information technology and legal experts. 

“They get to learn about DLA as a whole and the partners we support; not just military, but the whole of government partners they’re supporting in some of these disasters and missions,” Viruet said.

The supply chain experts, who range from GS-9s to GS-12s, bring their knowledge to support customers and help them understand DLA’s capabilities, she said.

“They’re also keeping leadership apprised of any requirements or issues out in the field because they’re on the ground with the customer,” she added.

In previous years, RDTs have deployed to support missions such as hurricane relief in Puerto Rico and training exercises in the Pacific. Although last year’s RDT activation to support the Defense Department’s nationwide COVID-19 response was virtual, Viruet said teams will train and deploy in person for 2022 missions.

Current recruitment efforts are focused on the deputy commander and operations officer positions. 

“[Volunteers] need to highlight their knowledge of DLA and leadership experience, especially if they have any experience in crisis or contingency operations – that’s really what we’re going to look for in the resume,” she said.

After obtaining supervisory approval, RDT members will receive deployment training and equipment at Camp Atterbury, Indiana. Two 2021 training sessions are scheduled for October 18-26 and November 15-23.

Employees interested in serving on an RDT should contact Viruet at sabrina.viruet@dla.mil or 571-363-8919. They can also view the June 17 DLA operation order for more information (A Common Access Card is required to view).
160 A.3d 710

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT RHODES, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

*163It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302 I, Michael S. Duffey, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Covansys
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods represented in this annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. /s/ Michael S. DuffeyChief Financial OfficerDate: March 30, 2004
#### McKay, Matter of, v Village of Endicott

3d Dept: 139 AD3d 1327

denied