alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Nos. 10-1526, 10-2164 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v. LUIS ORLANDO MONSERRATE-VALENTÍN, JAVIER FIGUEROA-VEGA, Defendants, Appellants.

**ERRATA SHEET** The opinion of this Court issued on September 6, 2013, is amended as follows: On page 30, line 19: replace "April 30, 2013" with "April 30, 2004"
# Encourage, Empower and Elevate

/ Published Aug. 9, 2019

Defense Logistics Agency Energy women were among the roughly 900 federal employees from across the nation who attended the annual Federally Employed Women’s National Training Program in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, July 22-26.

FEW is a private, non-profit organization dedicated to promoting equality for women and addressing concerns of women in the federal workplace. This year’s NTP theme was “Commemorating Fifty years of Training: Encourage, Empower and Elevate.”

“I attended a number of training opportunities, informative workshop sessions, and most notably the many networking opportunities with colleagues from different federal agencies,” said Meriem Hamilton, DLA Energy business process analyst. “The program offered nine training tracks of nearly 100 training courses, ranging from Career Advancement, Contracting, Computer Technology, Encore Career, Equal Employment Opportunity, Financial, Leadership, Professional Development to Project Management and Lean Six Sigma.”

Rita Wiggins, a DLA Energy Utility Services program manager, said she was excited to attend a training program that focused on the advancement of women.   

“The keynote speaker at the opening session, Ms. Barbara Littles, was extremely memorable,” Wiggins said. “Her message was to find those hidden figures in your life. Two of my favorite quotes were ‘do it afraid’ and ‘women need to learn to negotiate’ stop being afraid to ask for what you want or need.”

Hamilton said the knowledge and experiences she gained will increase her effectiveness in the workplace.

“The leadership, management, and diversity trainings provided me tools to excel and bring positive change to the workplace,” Hamilton said. “I recommend DLA Energy annual participation in the program to empower women and help them learn and achieve their highest potential both professionally and personally.”

As part of the DLA People and Culture Plan, DLA Energy offers the opportunity to attend other affinity groups including Blacks in Government, League of United Latin American Citizens, Federal Asian/Pacific Council and Society of American Indian Government Employees. 

“I hope the message is reinforced that they are valued as employees and their culture and heritage is appreciated and needed to help us deliver first-class service to the Warfighter,” said DLA Energy Equal Opportunity Director Darrel Bogan. “For those employees who have worked hard and done well in their jobs, it’s a great reward to attend.”

FEW’s NTP is open to all employees from military, private and public sector organizations. For more information about joining the DLA Energy FEW chapter, please contact Latoya Clayton-Bullock or Toka Trau-Massey.
2017-0581.

#### Hashash v. Food Mart Plus, Inc.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104552, 2017-Ohio-1158. On motion to increase bond. Motion denied.
#### John J. Ciafone, Appellant, v Jobs for NY, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[53 NYS3d 555]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sampson, J.), dated September 1, 2015, which granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for leave to renew their prior motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint, which had been denied in an order of the same court dated March 24, 2015, and, upon renewal, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

“It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal” *(Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Hounnou,*147 AD3d 814, 814 [2017] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Blaylock v State of New York,*118 AD3d 836, 836 [2014]). “An appellant’s record on appeal must contain all of the relevant papers before the Supreme Court” *(Gaffney v Gaffney,*29 AD3d 857, 857 [2006]; *see*CPLR 5526). “Appeals that are not based upon complete and proper records must be dismissed” *(Garnerville Holding Co. v IMC Mgt.,*299 AD2d 450, 450 [2002]; *see Ghatani v AGH*Realty, *LLC,*136 AD3d 744 [2016]).

Here, the record on appeal is inadequate. The appellant failed to include in the record all of the relevant documents that were before the Supreme Court. The order appealed from recited that opposition and reply papers were read on the defendants’ motion, inter alia, for leave to renew their prior motion to dismiss the complaint, yet no such opposition or reply papers appear in the record on appeal. The appeal must be dismissed because these omissions have rendered meaningful appellate review of the court’s order virtually impossible *(see Coello v Gonzalez,*96 AD3d 707, 707-708 [2012]; *Cope v Barakaat,*89 AD3d 670, 671 [2011]).

Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1certification pursuant to 18 u.s.c. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of thesarbanes-oxley act of 2002The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to my knowledgethat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification isprovided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or “filed” for anypurpose whatsoever.        Date:  May 15, 2007 Name: /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton    Sheldon C. Fenton    Title: Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32257-32258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15659]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request; Extension of Standard 
Form 113-G

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted a request to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for renewal of authority to collect data 
for the Monthly Report of Full-time Equivalent/Work-Year Civilian 
Employment (Standard Form 113-G). The data collected are used by OMB 
and OPM to: (1) monitor agencies' progress in increasing part-time 
employment; (2) aid OMB and the President in making decisions on 
agencies' budget appropriations for the next fiscal year; and (3) 
monitor agency work year usage under total approved FTE levels during 
the current fiscal year. One hundred thirty-one Federal agencies 
provide monthly reports to OPM. It takes 2 hours to complete one 
report, for an annual total information collection burden of 3,144 
hours. OPM published a preliminary notice of its intention to submit 
this request to OMB in the March 18, 1998 Federal Register at page 
13292. No comments were received as a result of this notification.
    For copies of the clearance package, call James M. Farron, Reports 
and Forms Manager, on (202) 418-3208, or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9df7f0fbfcefeff2f3ddf2edf0b3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5832353e392a2a373618372835763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 32258]]


DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before July 
13, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to:

May Eng, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 7439, 1900 E Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20415

      And

Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive 
Office Building, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: May Eng, (202) 606-2684.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Director.
[FR Doc. 98-15659 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Annual Report of The Dewey Electronics Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
    /s/ John H.D. Dewey
  John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive Officer
 Date:  September 26, 2011
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Dewey Electronics Corporation and will be retained by The Dewey Electronics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.**

** **

**Certification of Periodic Financial ReportPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

** **

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of theundersigned officers of Methode Electronics, Inc. (the “Company”)certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarter ended October 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained inthat Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: December 8, 2009 | /s/  Donald W. Duda      |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                         | Donald  W. Duda          |
|                         | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                         |                     |
|                         |                     |
| Dated: December 8, 2009 | /s/  Douglas A. Koman    |
|                         | Douglas  A. Koman        |
|                         | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0135

Focus Ready Draft 1/13/2011

ENGINEER: Avcin \ EV

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES:

.

 
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM]

SAT (concerns) (01/07/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Slow

PBT rating: P1B1T1 -

Health: 1

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 18 ppb.)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0135
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM]
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0135
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0135
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q12-4/Sanitization/July%202012/P-11-0135/p110135.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:27:26 AM]
No. 09-11425.

#### Anthony Dewayne Hood, Petitioner v. Tennessee Department of Children’s Services.

562 U.S. 879, 131 S. Ct. 196,

178 L. Ed. 2d 118,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6541.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division, denied.

Same case below, 338 S.W.3d 917.
# DLA Distribution Commander delivers Independence Day message

/ Published June 29, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
It brings me great pleasure to address you for the first time as your Commander, to recognize the importance of the upcoming celebration of our Nation’s Independence.

As we celebrate the July 4th holiday, we commemorate the brutal battles fought, the long debates, the many renditions of the Declaration of Independence reviewed and edited, and the resolution of the leaders who endured it all to establish our freedom, liberty, and independence.

Looking back at the start of the American Revolution in April of 1775, it was then that the first shots were fired between American colonists and British troops with the battles of Lexington and Concord. As tensions mounted, the Second Continental Congress met on July 2, 1776, and voted in favor of independence from Britain. On July 4, 1776, Congress approved the final draft of the Declaration of Independence. Meanwhile, in the New York harbor, British troops landed at Staten Island, preparing for battle with General George Washington’s forces. By August 4th, all delegates of the Continental Congress had signed and finalized the document.

The upcoming 246th birthday of our great Nation is a time to reflect on the freedoms we cherish and an opportunity to recommit ourselves to ensuring life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for future generations.

I am honored and humbled to have been selected to command this great organization, and even more thrilled to be part of an exceptional organization that is focused on supporting our Warfighters, Federal agencies and our whole of government partners.

Mr. Knight and I would ask that you take this time off to rest, recharge, and reflect with pride and honor on the fight for freedom, peace and security our ancestors endured, and how we can continue to honor the great nation they established.

We wish you a memorable and safe celebration. Have a happy July 4th holiday!
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-116637, 333-107795, 333-98545, 333-34522, 333-50605, 333-59075, 333-59077, 333-59079, 333-126725, 333-146231, 333-162961 and 333-162964) and on Form S-3(No. 333-160157) of American Dental Partners, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2010, relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Boston, MA 

March 16, 2011
2017-0231.

#### Rocky River v. Collins.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104180, 2017-Ohio-14.
*September 20, 2017*

2017-Ohio-7684.]

2016-1882.

#### State v. Graham.

Portage C.P. 2016 CR 107 E. On appellant’s third motion for extension of time to transmit record. Motion granted. The record shall be filed no later than October 9, 2017. No further extensions shall be permitted.
No. 09-1336.

#### Frank J. Lawrence, Jr., Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan.

562 U.S. 830, 131 S. Ct. 388,

178 L. Ed. 2d 28,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6563.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### People v Hiram

4th Dept: 142 AD3d 1304

denied*
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00330-CR

Gregory Harold Oakes, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 68602, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Gregory Harold Oakes plead guilty to the offense of possession of five pounds or

less but more than four ounces of marijuana in a drug-free zone, and the trial court sentenced him

to five years’ imprisonment. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.121 (West 2010). This

appeal followed. Appellant’s appointed counsel, Mr. W.W. Torrey, has filed a motion to withdraw

accompanied by a brief concluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). However, before counsel filed his Anders brief, he was elected

the District Attorney of Milam County, and his term commenced effective January 1, 2013. In

similar cases involving Mr. Torrey, this Court has abated the appeal and remanded the cause to the

trial court for consideration of whether counsel should be allowed to withdraw.1

See Parker v. State, No. 03-12-00540-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 1587, at *1-2 1

(Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 20, 2013, no pet. h.) (per curiam) (not designated for publication);
We will do the same here. If the district court determines that good cause exists to

relieve counsel of his duties and replace him with substitute counsel, the district court shall permit

counsel to withdraw and promptly appoint substitute counsel for the appeal of this cause. A copy

of the court’s order appointing substitute counsel and the court’s order granting counsel’s withdrawal

shall be forwarded to this Court no later than March 28, 2013.

The Anders brief that Mr. Torrey submitted has been marked “received” but will

not be filed until such time as substitute counsel files the required certificate of compliance with

the newly enacted Rule 9.4 regarding the length of briefs. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(3). Within

thirty days of appointment, substitute counsel shall file an amended brief with the Rule 9.4

certification and such other amendments as new counsel deems appropriate.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Abated

Filed: March 13, 2013

Do Not Publish

Williamson v. State, No. 03-12-00672-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 811, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin

Jan. 25, 2013, no pet. h.) (not designated for publication); Smalls v. State, No. 03-12-00241-CR,

2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 729, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 25, 2013, no pet. h.) (not designated

for publication).

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of APT Satellite Holdings Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cui
Xinzheng, Executive Director and Vice President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in tompany.

Date: June 28, 2004

/s/ Cui Xinzheng
______________________________________

Cui Xinzheng
Executive Director and Vice President
APT Satellite Holdings Limited

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to APT Satellite Holdings Limited (the "Company") and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itf
upon request.

                                       8
EXHIBIT 10.1

                                   MOCON, INC.

                            MOCON INCENTIVE PAY PLAN


         WHEREAS, the MOCON Incentive Pay Plan, covering the years 1997, 1998
and 1999, was adopted on January 3, 1997 subject to terms and conditions adopted
by resolution of the Compensation Committee; and

         WHEREAS, the Company has made acquisitions since the adoption of the
current Incentive Pay Plan and it is determined that it is desirable to modify
the Incentive Pay Plan for 1999 and future years.

         NOW, THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that the MOCON Incentive Pay Plan
for 1999 and subsequent years is as set forth in the following provisions, with
the proviso that these provisions shall be reviewed and modified by the
Compensation Committee as considered necessary;

         1)       This Incentive Pay Plan covers employees who do not have a
                  variable compensation component based on sales.

         2)       Total incentives to such employees are not to exceed 9.5% of
                  the net income before taxes and before incentives for such
                  calendar years under this Incentive Pay Plan.

         3)       The CEO and President incentive shall be 50% and 35% of salary
                  at goal; the actual incentive paid will be based on the
                  percentage of goal achieved, up to a maximum of 150%

         4)       The net income goal before tax and incentives shall be
                  determined annually by the Compensation Committee.

         5)       After the CEO's and President's incentive has been determined
                  for a year, the remaining amount available shall be
                  distributed at the discretion of the CEO. For example, the
                  incentives available for distribution, at goal, will be 9.5%
                  of the net income before taxes reduced by the CEO and
                  President incentives of 50% and 35% of salary, respectively,
                  leaving a total for discretionary incentives.

         6)       The incentives for each calendar year shall be paid in one
                  payment prior to March 15 of the following year.

         7)       Any amounts of discretionary incentives which are not
                  distributed shall remain as net income for the company.
#### Ivan Gordillo, Appellant, v Champ Hill LLC, Respondent.

[66 NYS3d 436]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered August 12, 2016, which, in an action for personal injuries, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to change venue from Bronx County to New York County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*471The untimeliness of defendant’s demand for a change of venue and the subsequent motion is excusable because the summons improperly indicated that plaintiff resided in Bronx County *(see Philogene v Fuller Auto Leasing,*167 AD2d 178 [1990]; *see also Oluwatayo v Dulinayan,*142 AD3d 113 [1st Dept 2016]; *Mann v Janyear Trading Corp.,*83 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2011]). The parties do not contest the fact that while plaintiff does not reside on the island of Manhattan, his Marble Hill building is located in New York County, and not the Bronx. The record shows that defendant promptly moved after ascertaining that the statement made by plaintiff was incorrect *(see Mann*at 566). Plaintiff’s arguments that defendant failed to show due diligence and was guilty of laches are unpersuasive, as the motion was made pursuant to CPLR 510 (1) (improper county) and not CPLR 510 (3) (convenience of the witnesses).

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Richter, Gesmer, Kern and Moulton, JJ.