alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VI

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2355

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel EMPRESS.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 3 (legislative day, JULY 20), 1994

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

EMPRESS.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 for the vessel EMPRESS, United States official number

9 975018.

Æ
#### HSBC Bank USA, Respondent, v Leo Tsimmer et al., Defendants.

[61 NYS3d 476]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered on or about November 29, 2016, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a final judgment of foreclosure and sale, deemed appeal from judgment of foreclosure and sale, same court, Justice, and entry date, and so considered, said judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*471The appeal from judgment entered in this case brings up for review “any non-final judgment or order which necessarily affects the final [order and] judgment,” provided that such non-final judgment or order has not been previously reviewed by this Court (CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Thus, defendant Leo Tsimmer’s arguments that plaintiff failed to negotiate a loan modification in good faith, which were addressed by Supreme Court’s March 28, 2016 order and not reviewed by this Court, may be considered. These arguments are unavailing.

CPLR 3408 (f) states that “[b]oth the plaintiff and defendant shall negotiate in good faith to reach a mutually agreeable resolution, including but not limited to a loan modification, ... if possible.” Although the term “good faith” is not defined by the statute, the determination of good faith is based on the “totality of the circumstances” *(Citibank, N.A. v Barclay,*124 AD3d 174, 176, 177 [1st Dept 2014] [internal quotation marks omitted]). “[T]here are situations in which the statutory goal is simply not financially feasible for either party” and “the mere fact that plaintiff refused to consider a reduction in principal or interest rate does not establish that it was not negotiating in good faith” *(id.*at 177).

The totality of the circumstances here shows that plaintiff negotiated in good faith with Tsimmer, but ultimately denied the loan modification as unaffordable based on Tsimmer’s annual income and the unpaid principal balance of the loan. There is no basis to disturb that determination.

We have considered Tsimmer’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Richter, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32431-32432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13972]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Thirty-Third Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting notice of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
thirty-third meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held on June 25, 2015 from 10:00 a.m.-3:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 224. The agenda will 
include the following:
     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
     Review/Approve Previous Meeting Summary.
     Report from the TSA.
     Report on Safe Skies on Document Distribution.
     Program Management Committee/TOR Report.
     Review of the Credentialing Section.
     Review of Other DO-230E Sections.
     Action Items for Next Meeting.
     Time and Place of Next Meeting.

[[Page 32432]]

     Any Other Business.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 2, 2015.
Victoria Frazier,
Branch Manager, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-13972 Filed 6-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
No. 09-1556.

#### Mark Jackson, et al., Petitioners v. Rohm & Haas Company, et al.

562 U.S. 840, 131 S. Ct. 206,

178 L. Ed. 2d 45,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5793.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 366 Fed. Appx. 342.
# DLA Aviation employees remember 9/11: Leon Moore

/ Published Sept. 6, 2021
RICHMOND, Va., 
*In commemoration of the 20th anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Public Affairs Office is running a week-long series Sept. 6-10 telling the stories of DLA Aviation employees who remember where they were and what they were doing that fateful day.*

**Name:**Leon Moore

**Organization:** DLA Aviation Richmond, Virginia

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?**I am a public affairs specialist within the DLA Aviation Public Affairs Office in Richmond, Virginia, on Defense Supply Center Richmond. We advise the commander and execute the commander's community relations, media relations, command information and protocol missions. We also provide oversight of web content and have sole release authority and act as the spokespersons for the command. My collateral duties include serving as the environmental and media public affairs lead for our office.  

**In a paragraph, please tell where you were and what you were doing on Sept. 11, 2001.** I was a month into my job as a TV reporter/anchor at a small station in Augusta, Georgia after serving 11-years in the Navy. We were gathered around watching the national media coverage on the TVs in the newsroom, and all I was thinking was how could a plane flying veer off course and hit the World Trade Centers. The next thing we knew, the second plane hit the WTC and then a plane hit the Pentagon and another crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. I knew then, these were no accidents and since I was still on Navy terminal leave, I thought I was going to be recalled back to active duty, which I wasn’t. I just remember thinking this is just the beginning of more attacks that day, which thankfully it was not.

**What can we do to ensure future generations never forget that fateful day?** I am a firm believer that we never let future generations forget what happened on that fateful day when more than 3,00 innocent people were killed. We have to constantly remind them that freedom isn’t free. It comes with a steep price, one that tens of thousands of service members have paid in these last two decades, either killed or injured for life. I honor them and this country still through my service as a public affairs officer in the Navy reserves, having deployed to Afghanistan and other parts around the world in support of the Global War on Terrorism.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 140 ) ll-E-10 0 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:08AM Sheet 140of 264P. 2 

### A-94-5 2 W-llOO
From : Date : Contact : Company : Contac tRepor t Melani e Proctor , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Jul y 31 , 199 7 Mr . Dic k Matthi s Artesia n Plumbing Product s (Newartesia n Managemen

t Company ) Covington , Tennessee , Plan t Telephon e Number : (419 ) 521-328 2 Contac tSummary : Mr . Matthi s wa s contacte d t o verif y th e gel coa

t hazardou s air

pollutant (HAP ) content informatio n provide d in th e 199 3 EP A screenin g surve

y submitte d by Artesia

n Plumbin g Products . Mr . Matthi s explaine d tha t th e Covington , Tennessee , plan t close d down i n 1994 .

EP A AI R DOCKE T
No. 10-5597.

#### Anthony Benjamin, Petitioner v. Corporal Reid, et al.

562 U.S. 930, 131 S. Ct. 325,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7279,

178 L. Ed. 2d 211,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
No. 10-5024.

#### James R. Sed, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 899, 131 S. Ct. 230,

178 L. Ed. 2d 152,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6276.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*153Same case below, 601 F.3d 224.
No. 10-5301.

#### Jermaine Antonio Armstrong, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 914, 131 S. Ct. 273,

178 L. Ed. 2d 180,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7107.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 366 Fed. Appx. 476.
#### Marjatta Freeman, Appellant, v Dan Brecher, Esq., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[64 NYS3d 13]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered January 13, 2016, which granted defendants-respondents’ motions to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s claim for legal malpractice in connection with an underlying settlement fails to state a cause of action in the absence of allegations that the “settlement . . . was effectively compelled by the mistakes of [defendant] counsel” *(Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co.,*160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]) or the result of fraud or coercion *(see Beattie v Brown & Wood,*243 AD2d 395 [1st Dept 1997]). Plaintiff’s equivocal denial of knowledge of the terms of the settlement is flatly contradicted by the clear terms of the settlement agreement *(see Bishop v Maurer,*33 AD3d 497, 499 [1st Dept 2006], *affd*9 NY3d 910 [2007]). Additionally, plaintiff’s speculative and conclusory allegations of proximately caused damages cannot serve as a basis for a legal malpractice claim *(see Pellegrino v File,*291 AD2d 60, 63 [1st Dept 2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 606 [2002]). Plaintiff’s cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty arising from the same conduct was correctly dismissed as duplicative *454of the legal malpractice claim *(see Garnett v Fox, Horan & Camerini, LLP,*82 AD3d 435, 436 [1st Dept 2011]; *InKine Pharm. Co. v Coleman,*305 AD2d 151, 152 [1st Dept 2003]). Plaintiff has abandoned her breach of fiduciary duty claim based on a referral scheme, and, in any event, has failed to properly plead such a scheme.

The speculative nature of plaintiffs claim of damages arising from defendant Dan Brecher’s alleged conflict of interest in assuming a board position in a company in which plaintiff invested while simultaneously serving as plaintiff’s counsel cannot support a legal malpractice claim *(see Dweck Law Firm v Mann,*283 AD2d 292, 294 [1st Dept 2001]).

The Judiciary Law § 487 claims were correctly dismissed, as the conduct alleged does not evince a chronic and/or extreme pattern of legal delinquency *(see Chowaiki & Co. Fine Art Ltd. v Lacher,*115 AD3d 600, 601 [1st Dept 2014]). Additionally, plaintiff has not alleged any proximately caused damages or identified any damages sustained as a result of Brecher’s alleged conflict of interest, which did not arise in the course of a judicial proceeding and thus is not actionable under the statute *(see Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP,*105 AD3d 643 [1st Dept 2013]).

Plaintiff’s unsubstantiated hope that discovery and time will help salvage her claims is insufficient to defeat the motions (see CPLR 3211 [d]; *Leonard v Gateway II, LLC,*68 AD3d 408, 410 [1st Dept 2009]).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Web-ber and Gesmer, JJ.
No. 09-11072.

#### Earlyn Walker, Petitioner v. University of Rochester, Strong Memorial Hospital.

562 U.S. 861, 131 S. Ct. 137,

178 L. Ed. 2d 83,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5958.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 188.
No. 10-5273.

#### Sean A. Clark, Petitioner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 269,

178 L. Ed. 2d 177,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6829,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Arias, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 288]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered May 11, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|No chart available.                                           
|No chart available.                                           
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Oregon Natural Gas International Receipts (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND THE CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,340,959
<SECURITIES>                                     5,122,006
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,120,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                       169,000
<INVENTORY>                                      1,999,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,031,661
<PP&E>                                           3,072,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,947,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,289,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,259,879
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           616,856
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,410,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,289,605
<SALES>                                         11,203,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,203,871
<CGS>                                            3,907,264
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,907,264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,852,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,443,642
<INCOME-TAX>                                       830,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,612,742
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,612,742
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.25
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,154
<INVENTORY>                                     22,872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,471
<PP&E>                                          38,168
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,170
<BONDS>                                        181,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (97,647)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,553
<SALES>                                         59,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,672
<CGS>                                           41,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,211
<INCOME-TAX>                                       628
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                583
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       583
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Constar International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Walter S. Sobon, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    WALTER S.
SOBON
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Walter S. Sobon                                     
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Coalition for Affordable Utility Services and Energy Efficiency in Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Com’n

04/05/2016

658, 659 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 120 A.3d 1087