alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Distribution Commander delivers Army Birthday message

/ Published June 14, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Distribution Teammates,

On Wednesday, June 14th, we celebrate the Army’s 248th birthday, paying tribute to their dedicated service to our nation.  The oldest branch of the military, the Army was created during the onset of the Revolutionary War, as the Battles of Lexington and Concord raged.  During that time, the fighting was done by colonial militias – mostly farmers who soldiered on a part-time basis.  As a result, the Continental Congress passed a resolution to create a unit of professionally trained soldiers ... ready to combat the British. The resolution read,  “Resolved, That six companies of expert riflemen [sic], be immediately raised in Pennsylvania, two in Maryland, and two in Virginia; ... [and] that each company, as soon as completed [sic], shall march and join the army near Boston, to be there employed as light infantry, under the command of the chief Officer in that army.”  Through this resolution, the first United States Army was formed – the Continental Army — representing all 13 colonies with the addition of troops from the three middle colonies.  A few days after the resolution was signed, on June 19th,  1775, George Washington humbly accepted a commission as the Army’s first Commanding General.  Drawing on both long-standing militia traditions and recently introduced professional standards, the Army endured an arduous eight-year battle with Great Britain to win the new republic’s independence.  

One of the Army’s unsung heroes was another former President,  William McKinley, the 25th President of the United States.  Before becoming President, McKinley was working as a schoolteacher in Poland, Ohio, when the Civil War broke out.  In June 1861, he left teaching and enlisted in the Union Army as a private in the 23rd Ohio Volunteer Infantry Regiment, also known as the “Poland Guards.”  Early in the war, McKinley distinguished himself as a capable Soldier at the Battles of Carnifex Ferry and Fayetteville, West Virginia.  The following year, McKinley fought in the bloody Battle of Antietam and proved his bravery by delivering much-needed supplies and rations to frontline Soldiers under heavy fire. For his courageous acts, McKinley was promoted to second lieutenant.  

From the Revolutionary War until now, the Army continues to embody their values of loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, and personal courage.  Today, we celebrate the courage of Army soldiers who continue to defend the nation from threats around the world, selflessly supporting the nation and the U.S. Constitution.  They are all real men and women ... someone’s son or daughter, husband or wife, or father or mother ... who selflessly put their lives on the line every day.

I along with Mr. Knight, retired U.S. Army, would like to thank each and every one of you for your continued support to our warfighters as they continue to answer the nation’s call and a very Happy 248th Army Birthday to all current and former Army Soldiers!

V/R,

G. D. CHASERADM, SC, USN Commander
No. 10-5122.

#### Leon Martin, Petitioner v. Virginia.

562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 245,

178 L. Ed. 2d 163,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6608.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.
#### People v Hizbullah

App Div, 2d Dept: 2016 NY Slip Op 95323(U) (Kings)

dismissed 3/16/17 (Stein, J.)
<PAGE>

                             Verizon Delaware Inc.

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                               Years Ended December 31,
                                                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands)                                          2001           2000           1999            1998           1997
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                         <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>            <C>
Income before provision for income taxes and
  extraordinary item                                        $ 56,402       $ 66,040       $ 81,553        $ 68,650       $ 58,471
Equity in loss (income) from affiliates                       15,229          1,965            (60)            ---            ---
Dividends received from equity affiliate                          57             80             60             ---            ---
Interest expense                                               9,274         10,108          8,429           9,493          9,287
Portion of rent expense representing interest                  3,979          1,993          1,882           1,713          2,258
Amortization of capitalized interest                             398            391            352             310            254
                                                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings, as adjusted                                       $ 85,339       $ 80,577       $ 92,216        $ 80,166       $ 70,270
                                                       ============================================================================

Fixed charges:
Interest expense                                            $  9,274       $ 10,108       $  8,429        $  9,493       $  9,287
Portion of rent expense representing interest                  3,979          1,993          1,882           1,713          2,258
Capitalized interest                                             993            634            420             944            428
                                                       ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fixed Charges                                               $ 14,246       $ 12,735       $ 10,731        $ 12,150       $ 11,973
                                                       ============================================================================

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                              5.99           6.33           8.59            6.60           5.87
                                                       ============================================================================
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gary C. Granoff, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ GARY C. GRANOFF
----------------------------------------------
GARY C. GRANOFF
PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Febryary 14, 2005
2017-0337.

#### State v. Brigner.

Athens App. No. 16CA25.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Jackson, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 891]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx (Megan Tallmer, J.), entered on or about May 31, 2013, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure *(see People v Gillotti,*23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant, such as those relating to the facts of the crime and defendant’s subsequent good behavior, were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument. Even accepting defendant’s argument that the assessment of 30 points for a prior violent felony involving no actual violence may have been excessive, we note that in denying a departure the court properly considered defendant’s multiple misdemeanor weapon *540possession convictions and his prior misdemeanor assault conviction.

We find no basis to conclude that the court employed the wrong standard in analyzing defendant’s request for a downward departure.

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Webber, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
No. 10-5186.

#### Kenneth Wayne Moore, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 908, 131 S. Ct. 255,

178 L. Ed. 2d 169,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6843.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 365 Fed. Appx. 800.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF MEDIACOM LLC AND
ITS SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001064116
<NAME> Mediacom LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,923
<SECURITIES>                                     9,797
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                       774
<INVENTORY>                                     13,759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         846,173
<DEPRECIATION>                               (184,940)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,279,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     296,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,279,087
<SALES>                                        244,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               244,513
<CGS>                                           83,813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  286,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (94,418)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (94,418)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (94,418)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/26 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 77.38 WMeters AGL
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**STATEMENT
      OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**





Pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Andrew
      Carr Conway, Jr., chief accounting officer of Axion Power International, Inc
      (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The
      Company’s Form 10-KSB/A Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Andrew Carr Conway, Jr.Andrew
                Carr Conway, Jr., Chief Financial OfficerDated:
                October 3, 2007
No. 09-11487.

#### Perla Icela Cuevas Lugo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 883, 131 S. Ct. 208,

178 L. Ed. 2d 125,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6566.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-11174.

#### Dale Shoop, Petitioner v. West Virginia.

562 U.S. 865, 131 S. Ct. 153,

178 L. Ed. 2d 91,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6617.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of West Virginia, Morgan County, denied.
No. 10-5631.

#### Juan A. Ramos, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 932, 131 S. Ct. 329,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7454.

178 L. Ed. 2d 214,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.1


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT


TO


ZENITH NATIONAL INSURANCE CORP.


2003 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


 


Zenith National Insurance
Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby amends the Zenith
National Insurance Corp. 2003 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan
(the “Plan”), effective December 2, 2004, with reference to the following:


 


WHEREAS, the Company
maintains the Plan for the benefit of its non-employee directors; and


 


WHEREAS, Section 10.7(a) of
the Plan provides that the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may
amend the Plan at any time; and


 


WHEREAS, Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), places restrictions as
to the timing of distributions from nonqualified deferred compensation plans;
and


 


WHEREAS, the Board desires
to amend the Plan to comply with Section 409A of the Code.


 


NOW THEREFORE, Section
10.7(b) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


Notwithstanding the
foregoing paragraph or any other provision in this Plan to the contrary, the
Board may terminate the Plan at any time. 
Upon termination of the Plan, Benefits shall not be distributed earlier
than otherwise due to Participants in accordance with the terms of the Plan and
applicable Deferred Compensation Agreements. 
Any amounts not distributed after payment in full of all Benefits
hereunder shall revert to the Company.


 


IN
WITNESS HEREOF, the
Company has executed this First Amendment to the Plan effective as of the date
written above.


 


	
   

  	
  ZENITH NATIONAL INSURANCE
  CORP.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  by:

  	
  /s/ Stanley R. Zax

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Stanley R. Zax

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  President and Chairman of
  the Board
#### Yolanda Mercedes Polanco Del Marte et al., Appellants, v Leka Realty LLC, Respondent.

[67 NYS3d 16]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered July 6, 2016, dismissing the complaint, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered June 21, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the complaint reinstated.

Plaintiff Yolanda Mercedes Polanco Del Marte alleges that she was injured in May 2013 after she fell as a result of a loose step on a staircase located between the second and third floors of a building owned by defendant.

A defendant moving for summary judgment in a case involving an alleged dangerous condition “has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing that it neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the unsafe condition” *(Rosario v Prana Nine Props., LLC,*143 AD3d 409, 410 [1st Dept 2016]). Upon the defendant establishing prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to raise a triable issue of fact *(Kesselman v Lever House Rest.,*29 AD3d 302, 303-304 [1st Dept 2006]).

Here, defendant made a prima facie showing that it did not cause or create the loose step, by submitting its property manager’s and superintendent’s deposition testimony that no *454repairs were made to the staircase since defendant’s acquisition of the building in December 2009. Plaintiff’s expert, however, raised a triable issue of fact on this issue.

In response to defendant’s expert’s opinion that “[a]ny motion in the step[ ] is imperceptible,” plaintiff’s expert, who inspected the area approximately one month after the accident, “observed that the tread moved and was unstable.” Plaintiff’s expert opined that the step had been repaired using a rubber adhesive applied to the tread of the step, that the repair was not conducted properly and was inadequate, and that the “condition had been present for a long period of time.” Defendant’s expert failed to provide any rebuttal to this opinion, nor did defendant’s property manager or superintendent address plaintiff’s expert’s claim after it was raised in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, a triable issue of fact exists as to whether defendant caused or created a dangerous condition that proximately caused plaintiff’s accident.

Concur—Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VERIDIEN CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  421,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,096
<INVENTORY>                                    146,121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               603,064
<PP&E>                                         472,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                 420,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 743,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,376,924
<BONDS>                                      1,853,629
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     60,169
<COMMON>                                        99,830
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,652,301)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   743,127
<SALES>                                        176,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               448,156
<CGS>                                          118,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,115,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             150,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (817,267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (817,267)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (817,267)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.009)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.005)
<FN>
With regard to commitments and contingencies referred to in our footnotes at
December 31, 1998, as of June 30, 1999, settlements were completed at nominal
cost involving litigation of potential rescission of common stock and the
assertion by the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) concerning an alleged
violation of labeling of one shipment of product considered to be hazardous
material.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
   
  THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906
 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
   
   Dated:  November 9, 2009
  /s/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
 Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
 President and Chairman of the Board
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C., as 
amended. Applications and the discussion could reveal confidential 
trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of person privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Review Group 
Subcommittee F--Manpower and Training.
    Dates: June 17-19, 1998.
    Times: June 17, 1998--4:00 p.m. to Recess; June 18, 1998--8:00 
a.m. to Recess; June 19, 1998--8:00 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Georgetown, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant proposals.
    Contact Person: Mary Bell, Scientific Review Administrator, 
National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6130 Executive Blvd., EPN, Room 
611A, Bethesda, MD 20892-7405, Telephone: 301-496-7978.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.393, 
Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, 
Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, 
Cancer Research Manpower, 93.399, Cancer Control)

    Dated: June 9, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-16097 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M