alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50021 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PAULO ZAPATA-IBARRA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-03-CR-445-1-WWJ

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Paulo Zapata-Ibarra appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Zapata-Ibarra contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Zapata-Ibarra maintains that he United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-50021 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Zapata-Ibarra acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302 I, James S. Trouba, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Covansys
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods represented in this annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. /s/ James S. TroubaChief Financial OfficerDate: August 4, 2004
Adams, Kevin 

### (OSn From: Sent: Ta,: Subject: Mr. Adams: Matt Mitchell <mjmitchell98@gmail.com> Friday, June 01, 2012 7:39 AM Adams, Kevin (OST) Support for Sky West Airlines



### -- i

I support the effort to award SkyWest Airlines the Essential Air Service contract in Alpena. I have read every proposal submitted and this is the one thatmakes the best sense for Alpena. Any other proposal would be a huge step backwards in the progress this airport has beenmaking. The Sky Westproposal offers a productthat people will continue to use, in growing numbers. The economic vitality ofthis regionhinges onreliable air service in and out ofAlpena. The other communities in Michigan who havebeen awarded contracts with regional carriers similar to SkyWest would agree that regionaljet service to and from code sharing hubs is the only way to go. With SkyWest, ourbusinesses, our senior citizens, and ourcommunity in general will have a win-win product. Sky West is a wise investment ofEssential Air Service dollars. Sincerely, Matt Mitchell Alpena, MI

1
No. 10-55.

#### Xiaoping Yao, Petitioner v. Visa Incorporated, et al.

562 U.S. 892, 131 S. Ct. 263,

178 L. Ed. 2d 139,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6119.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 385.
.. ; a... .-. -.. ?

‘. t%g

, : OFFICE 6F THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN ..

, aaru, 0. MANN A-- *’ . I HoAOrabla 

### A. B. Dunlap, Xembef Board oi Xatsr X.ngineers duet& !l"sxaa Dear Sirt .

_
. iIoontained in the 0Dspartmntal Appro11, S. 8. 423, Aots

prosuoh lhitatiOA8 are plaaed UPOA the mOA6yS aDproyogzIby Eouse,Bill,?. 

### 739. Sootion 6 of said Aot reads es

wsSat3t iOA 6. There Is hereby appropriated out of any funI in the 3tate Tresaury not otherwise appropriated the swn of Thirty Thousand Dollars~ ($30,000.00), ror the purpose of carrylm Out the*

i
I ~ooorabl4 

### A. E.'Dodlap Y &go I.

. . . 

### protleiona Ofthis Aot. Said money ahall.be paid Out OA SWO2A accounts approved by theAttorney C~sAaral and shall ba paid out OS the Stat8 Treasury oh yfirranto 

## or the aoaptrollsr 88,under Csasral Lawa. It ie Our OpiAiOA that the linitatlons up&A travslisig eXpOA868 0OAttliASdiA the rider 

## t0 S0A3te Dill ;$I&123 apply only t0 ths appropriationa aade by ssid bill; oo~mqaontly they do not apply to tha ‘appropriation undo by Bouse .’ 

### Bill Its. 739. to~&tiolo?A this 4QAA4OtiOA We Oail iOur att&tiOA htwetiq



### 6823, reviled civil statutes of 

### FOX~~I,1925, BB, aaenttsd

by Chapter 216, page 

### 37;!,~Aots 1931, &WI Legislature, mhiohreads as followst

wTha traveling aAd,other neoasaarg axpe~ses 

### lnourrt?d by tha various of':ioexs,assistants, 'dsp- ‘. UtiOS, oierka aAd ,uth,sr 4r@~$944 in the VariOus dspartmnta, inatltutlons, boards, oomzisaione or other subdivisions ot the Stat4 G-avernmznt,in the aotive dlsoharge of their duties shall be ~sucha8 are spsoifioaLly~f~xed and appr~oniatad by tha tegls~ lature IA the .&were1 approprlatlon bills providing tq ~tho.expeAkeaof .th4State Cavrerntinent fxom ysar to y0a.r. 'rihen

appropr~atlons fox trevel2ng 6xpGtlses. ar4 

### meas any ellow3kosar

### or payzonts to oifioials 

### or bmploye4s Sor th4 use of privately ommd aatoolobllse shall be 6~ a beaie of eotuel nileago traveled iOr aach trlp or all tripa oovewd by the 4xp4nss amounts eubtittcd for payneAt,

### or rllvwanoa fronteuah sppro

### prla$ions, aud,suoh payment or allbwanoe shall bo made at a rate not to oxceed five (%I cents for ea4hAile ootuallg trevelad, and no additional axp4n44 iACiaQAt to ths OperQtioA or auoh automobile shill b4 allOwed.', W4 d0 not bsllsoa that the flret eentsnao of 

### thie Bbttlte ptwprsrta

### to inoorporate by refemmcs the 

### llnltations upontraveling ;expenseawhlah Aay ba containad in t&o DepertmentalApprogrfatloa Bill or any other general appropriation bill iAt4 Oth~4rappropriations whorsla auah limitations are notexpressly oontained. 2,:;;'~ do believe 

### however that the llmftati0A Of 5 04AtS per mile,for th4 use of p*ivatoly 

## -*aaat~~blle8 applles p,enarallyas a lknitation upon ail traveling exgenasa lrrespeotlve ofwhether such a lltitatlon is 8x0 . presaly.oontained.in the partioular appropriation bill.

Truetlng that the forsgolng answer8 your inquiry, we are 

## fours very truly ATT0Rm-Y

CS~OP TRXAS
Walter R. Iiooh .' Assistant

ATTORNEY GEEEBAL QP TEXAS
No. 10-5444.

#### Darrell Gist, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 922, 131 S. Ct. 300,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7303.

178 L. Ed. 2d 195,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 382 Fed. Appx. 181.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certificationof Principal Financial Officer**

**Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or15d-14(b)**

**of the Exchange Act**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAdvanstar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Theodore S. Alpert, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 (1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company.
| By:    | /s/ Ted S.  Alpert      |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Theodore S. Alpert      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                    |
|   | Date: May 8, 2007       |

 

----
# DLA working toward G-Invoicing compliance

/ Published Nov. 2, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency is working to comply with the Treasury Department’s Government-Invoicing program, which will allow federal agencies to manage intragovernmental buy and sell transactions through a common web-based platform.

Proposed benefits of the program include better communication between trading partners, increased transparency, common data standards, agreed-upon processes, and the ability to send and receive funds quickly and efficiently.

“It’s breaking down the walls and stovepipes between Defense Department components and the federal civilian agencies to ensure all agencies within the federal government are processing intragovernmental transactions in a standard and consistent manner,” said Michael Lane, branch chief of DLA G-Invoicing Division’s Program and Process Support Branch.

While Treasury planned for all federal agencies to implement G-Invoicing by October 1, 2022, DLA expects to fully implement it by April 2024. Until then, the agency will continue conducting business using legacy systems and processes per guidance from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment.

Many of DLA’s trading partners, previously referred to as customers and vendors, are expected to move to the program around the same time, Lane said.

DLA ordering software like the Medical Electronic Catalog and the Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Orders and Receipt System will still be used after G-Invoicing implementation, added Max Walens, branch chief of DLA G-Invoicing’s General Terms and Conditions Center of Excellence.

Trading partners must, however, have a general terms and conditions agreement in place before placing orders through G-Invoicing processes, which will replace manual funding documents such as the Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request, or DD Form 448. Walens and his team have hosted numerous forums with trading partners to collaborate on completing agreements as well as other processes.

G-Invoicing will automate and streamline how DLA receives payment for goods and services while also resolving longstanding audit findings, eliminating material weaknesses and improving efficiency, Walens continued. But it will require significant changes. DLA’s G-Invoicing team is working with agency information technology specialists to create software solutions that enable DLA business systems to process intragovernmental data and allow DLA financial information to flow seamlessly to the G-Invoicing system.

“For DLA to manually input data into the Treasury system, we’d be talking about hundreds and thousands of staffing hours and risk potential double payments,” he said.

DLA will have the largest amount of money of any DOD activity, possibly the federal government, going through the intragovernmental payment and collection system, Lane said.

More information is available at the DLA G-Invoicing website.
2016-1489.

#### Wood Cty. Bar. Assn. v. Searfoss.

On report by the Board of Professional Conduct. In 2017-0997, *In re Resignation of Searfoss,*this court accepted respondent’s resignation with disciplinary action pending. Therefore, this cause is dismissed. Costs are taxed to respondent.
#### Lindemuth v. W.C.A.B. (Strishock Coal Co.)

08/11/2016

161 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 134 A.3d 111
# Employee Reflection: Nancy Todd

/ Published Feb. 25, 2022

                DLA Disposition Services San Joaquin Work Lead Nancy Todd.                            220115-D-D0441-6545                            DLA Disposition Services San Joaquin Work Lead Nancy Todd.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Courtesy photoVIRIN: 220115-D-D0441-6545**Describe your job.**

In addition to relaying supervisor directions, I keep the team abreast of new processes, changes in standard operating procedures, as well as reminders of current practices. I compile the DMCH, DMCH Resolved, and do the relocations, as well as researching and resolving troubled property.

**How long have you worked for the federal government including military service?**

17 years.

**How long have you worked for DLA Disposition Services?**

15 years.

**Any good work memories?**

Traveling to Battle Creek for the mentoring program. I think the most enjoyable memories are when we used to have our yearly picnics, as well as Christmas get-togethers.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction and why?**

Helping to find/figure out what happened to lost property. Love that research!

**What is the best piece of advice someone has given you?**

Do it right the first time!

**Where do you see yourself five years from now?**

Hopefully retired!

**Read any good books lately?**

Recently discovered author James Rollins. He has been described as a cross between Dan Brown (*The DaVinci Code)*and Clive Cussler, who wrote many books with a nautical basis. All three authors write from fact-based historical perspectives, with the good guy winning at the end.

**Any favorite quotes?**

“If a cluttered desk is a sign of a cluttered mind, of what, then, is an empty desk a sign?” – Albert Einstein
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-588-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Request 
Under Blanket Authorization

June 10, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 2, 1998, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin) 200 North Third Street, Suite 300, 
Bismarck, North Dakota, filed in Docket No. CP98-588-000 a request 
pursuant to Sections 157.205, 157.211 and 157.216 of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.211 and 
157.216) for authorization to upgrade existing meter stations in 
Montana, South Dakota and Wyoming, under Williston Basin's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-487-000 pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
no file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Williston Basin states it is requesting authorization to upgrade 
existing meter stations in Fallon and Phillips Countries, Montana, 
Butte County, South Dakota and Big Horn County, Wyoming by abandoning 
certain existing facilities and constructing and operating upgraded 
facilities to allow Williston Basin to convert to Electronic Custody 
Transfer measurement at these locations. The Total cost of the proposed 
upgrades is approximately $48,000.
    Williston Basin states that this proposal is not prohibited by its 
existing tariff and that it has sufficient capacity to accomplish 
deliveries without detriment or disadvantage to other customers. There 
will be no effect on Williston Basin's peak day and annual deliveries 
and the total volumes delivered will not exceed total volumes 
authorized prior to this request.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15904 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-116637, 333-107795, 333-98545, 333-34522, 333-50605, 333-59075, 333-59077, 333-59079, 333-126725,333-146231, 333-162961 and 333-162964) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-160157) of American Dental Partners, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2010, relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 10-K. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Boston, MA 

March 12, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2013

s1021

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2013

147132

LEONARD GUST and SHARON GUST,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 147132

COA: 311844

Lenawee CC: 10-003769-CZ

LENAWEE COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 9, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted.
# Pure Praxis Hosts Interactive Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention Month Training with DLA Troop Support

/ Published April 12, 2023
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Sexual Assault Response Team hosted Pure Praxis, a Long Beach, California-based interactive training firm, on April 6, to kickoff Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention Month 2023. 

“This year I wanted the focus to be on intervention and the “Continuum of Harm” and relate it directly to what we could see at the workplace—simply because we’re back at the office,” said Gina Ingrao, Sexual Assault Response Coordinator for DLA Troop Support. Continuum of Harm is defined as: a destructive pattern of behavior with numerous negative consequences. 

“A SARC will offer the option of Restrictive Reporting or Unrestricted Reporting for all active-duty, reservists, guardsman, dependents of active-duty members 18 years of age and older, and civilian employees assigned to DLA,” said Ingrao. 

Under DOD's Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Policy, there are two reporting options - Restricted Reporting and Unrestricted Reporting. Under Unrestricted Reporting, both the command and law enforcement are notified. With Restricted (Confidential) Reporting, the adult sexual assault victim can access healthcare, advocacy services, and legal services without the notification to command or law enforcement. 

Prue Praxis, a team of skilled and diverse performance facilitators and actor advocates performed two 60-minute interactive intervention trainings during the day. Employees could attend in-person or virtual for the morning or afternoon training. 

“For the month of April, we have 16 different trainings scheduled across the states and internationally,” said Kelly Pfleider, founder and president of Pure Praxis. “We are excited to go wherever we are needed to do the work.” 

“The most memorable training I remember was from 2018 in Okinawa, Japan,” said Pfleider. “The audience stood up on their own, recognizing that they wanted to be the change. We came into their workspace to hold interactive trainings. For them to take the initiative right away was just powerful and it still sits with me.” 

This event featured continuous engagement with the DLA Troop Support audience. Those in attendance were asked about their reactions after each short skit was performed. Two of the skits brought employees on stage giving them an opportunity to interact.  

“When you come on stage remember: there is no script, nor a wrong answer,” said Cassandra Babcock, performer with Pure Praxis. “We are here to discuss how unchecked jokes can escalate into much more severe and damaging behavior.”  

The next scheduled DLA Troop Support event is Learn & Lunch: How to Support Those Effected by Sexual Violence on April 20 from noon until 12:30 p.m. 

Pure Praxis has worked with the Department of Defense since 2014. In those nine years, they have over 5,000 performances with an estimated total audience of 450,000 people.