alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Construction of Phase 2 of Aviation Operations Center nearly halfway to completion

/ Published Aug. 31, 2022
RICHMOND, Va, 
About a year-an- a-half ago, if your office or cubicle was located in Building 46 on Defense Supply Center Richmond, you used to be able to look out one of the huge windows and get a birds-eye-view of the Bellwood elk roaming freely.

Steel beams, concrete, purple backer-boarding and crews operating heavy machinery have now replaced that view as construction of Phase 2 of the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Operations Center is in full swing.

Contractors have installed most of the foundation, steel framing and concrete flooring for the massive five-story building that, when finished, will sit next to and mirror Phase I of the Operations Center (Bldg. 46), but not physically connect. Workers have also installed 220 geothermal wells required to support the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system for Phase 2, which will be Building 47.

Over the next several months, contractors will be installing the roofing, exterior walls and rooftop heating, ventilation, and air conditioning units and associated ductwork. Once this is complete, they will begin working on completing the interior of the building.

Construction of Phase 2 officially began February 2021, and is estimated to be completed by December 2023. Spring 2024 is when those scheduled to occupy the new 281,064 square-foot facility will begin the move in process.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief financial officer of
MicroVision, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)     the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: May 9, 2011 | /s/ Jeff T. Wilson
                      Jeff T. WilsonChief Financial Officer
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Patch International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David Stadnyk, President, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Executive and
Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


 /s/ DAVID STADNYK
-------------------------------------------
David Stadnyk
President, Secretary and Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16275]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

38 CFR Part 0

RIN 2900-AJ27


Delegation of Authority for Certain Ethics Matters

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
regulations captioned ``Standards of Ethical Conduct and Related 
Responsibilities.'' It removes material regarding certain ethics 
determinations for agency employees. This material is not required to 
be published in the Code of Federal Regulations because it does not 
affect the public. It affects only internal VA practices.

DATES: Effective Date: June 19, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Walter A. Hall, Assistant General 
Counsel (023) and Designated Agency Ethics Official, Department of 
Veterans Affairs, Office of General Counsel, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20420, telephone (202) 273-6334.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document does not constitute rulemaking 
under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553. Accordingly, there is no 
basis for prior notice and comment or a delayed effective date.
    This document does not concern a ``rule'' as defined in the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act. 5 U.S.C. 601. Nevertheless, the Secretary 
hereby certifies that this regulatory amendment will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, because the amendment only affects individuals.
    There is no Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program number.

List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 0

    Conflict of interests.

    Approved: May 27, 1998.
Togo D. West, Jr.,
Secretary.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 38 CFR part 0, subpart 
A, is amended as follows:

PART 0--STANDARDS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT AND RELATED RESPONSIBILITIES

    1. The authority citation for part 0 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 38 U.S.C. 501; see sections 201, 301, 
and 502(a) of E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p. 215 as 
modified by E.O. 12731, 55 FR 42547, 3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306.

Subpart A--General Provisions


Sec. 0.735-2  [Removed]

    2. Section 0.735-2 is removed.


Sec. 0.735-3  [Redesignated as Sec. 0.735-2]

    3. Section 0.735-3 is redesignated as Sec. 0.735-2.

[FR Doc. 98-16275 Filed 6-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Damien A. Smith, Appellant.

[57 NYS3d 419]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (T. Murphy, J.), rendered January 28, 2016, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the People failed to prove that he intended to sell heroin that was in his possession is unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant did not specify this ground in his motion to dismiss at trial *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]). The defendant’s intent to sell was established with evidence that he possessed 53 glassine envelopes of heroin that were divided into six bundles within a larger sandwich bag, and the expert’s testimony that this packaging and quantity was consistent with the sale of drugs *(see People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233, 245-246 [1987]; *People v Hewitt,*220 AD2d 686, 686 [1995]; *People v Nelson,*189 AD2d 828, 829 [1993]; *People v Herndon,*176 AD2d 817, 817 [1991]; *People v Blue,*173 AD2d 836 [1991]).

The sentence imposed was'not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, 85-86 [1982]).

Balkin, J.P., Austin, Roman and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2




STATEMENT
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Thomas
Granville, Principal Financial Officer of Axion Power International, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:




The
Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Thomas GranvilleThomas
      Granville, Principal Financial OfficerDated:
      March 30, 2010
# Tyler selected as new DLA Aviation Commander

/ Published May 12, 2022
RICHMOND, Va. , 
Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler has been selected to serve as the next Defense Logistics Agency Aviation commander at Richmond, Virginia. He will replace Air Force Brig. Gen. David Sanford, whose next assignment will be director of logistics, engineering and force protection for Headquarters Air Mobility Command at Scott Air Force Base, Illinois.

Tyler is currently the director, logistics, engineering and force protection, Headquarters Pacific Air Forces, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Honolulu, Hawaii.  His previous assignments include associate director, Directorate of Resource Integration, deputy chief of staff for logistics, engineering and force protection, Pentagon, Washington D.C; and commander, 633rd Air Base Wing at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia.

He also previously served as executive officer to the DLA director and chief of staff, DLA Acquisition, both at DLA Headquarters, Fort Belvoir, Virginia.  

A change of command ceremony is being planned for June.
Exhibit 10.2

                                    AGREEMENT


         AGREEMENT dated this __ day of November 2004, by and between ABC
Funding, Inc. (hereinafter "ABC"), a Nevada Corporation, with offices located at
9160 South 300 West, Sandy, Utah 84070, Harold Barson, President of ABC and Gary
B. Wolff, P.C., counsel to ABC, with offices located at 805 Third Avenue, New
York, New York.

         WHEREAS, ABC is about to file a Registration Statement with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter the "SEC") on Form SB-2
which Registration Statement indicates in Part II, Item 25, offering expenses
totaling sixty eight thousand six hundred one dollars ($68,601) of which fifty
thousand ($50,000) dollars are indicated as legal fees and expenses; and

         WHEREAS, ABC has agreed to pay all such costs as and when necessary and
required, or to otherwise accrue such costs on its books and records until it is
able to pay the full amount due, either from revenues or loans from its
President.


         NOW, THEREFORE, it is herewith agreed as follows: Absent sufficient
revenues to pay these amounts within three (3) months of the date of the ABC
prospectus, ABC's President agrees to loan ABC the funds to cover the balance of
outstanding professional and related fees relating to ABC's prospectus. If and
when loaned, the loan will be evidenced by a non-interest bearing unsecured
corporate note to be treated as a loan until repaid, if and when ABC has the
financial resources to do so.


         The parties hereto understand that the above constitutes a binding
Agreement and that the contents thereof are referred to in the aforesaid
Registration Statement, in the subheading entitled "Liquidity" as found in the
Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation section.

         The above constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties hereto.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the __ day of November 2004.



ABC FUNDING, INC.


By: /s/
        -----------------------------
        Harold Barson, President


By: /s/
        -----------------------------
         Harold Barson, Individually


GARY B. WOLFF, P.C.

By: /s/
        -----------------------------
         Gary B. Wolff, President
No. 10-5816.

#### Anthony Roosevelt King, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 938, 131 S. Ct. 349,

178 L. Ed. 2d 226,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7405.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 948.
No. 10-267.

#### United States ex rel. Patricia Haight and In Defense of Animals, Petitioner v. Catholic Healthcare West, et al.

562 U.S. 898, 131 S. Ct. 366,

178 L. Ed. 2d 150,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6102.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 602 F.3d 949.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1218 

CUSTOM METALCRAFT, INC., 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

HOOVER MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

2007-1242 

CUSTOM METALCRAFT, INC., 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v. 

HOOVER MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

ON MOTION 

Before SCHALL, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges. 

LINN, Circuit Judge. 

O R D E R

 Custom Metalcraft, Inc. moves to dismiss Hoover Materials Handling Group, 

Inc.'s appeal, 2007-1242. Hoover moves to stay disposition of the motion to dismiss. 

Custom Metalcraft opposes. 
 On February 8, 2007, the United States District Court for the Western District of 

Missouri certified its judgment of noninfringement pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). 

Custom Metalcraft appealed, appeal no. 2007-1218. Hoover filed a cross-appeal, 

appeal no. 2007-1242, seeking review of an order granting summary judgment that the 

patent was not invalid on certain grounds. On May 9, 2007, after Hoover filed its 

appeal, the district court denied Hoover's motion to certify its disposition of Hoover's 

invalidity counterclaims pursuant to Rule 54(b). 

 Because there is no final judgment disposing of Hoover's counterclaims 

concerning invalidity, Hoover's appeal must be dismissed. Nystrom v. Trex Co., Inc., 

339 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2003). 

 Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 (1) The motion to dismiss appeal no. 2007-1242 is granted. 

 (2) Hoover's motion to stay is denied. 

 (3) A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to 

hear appeal no. 2007-1218 to inform the panel of the disposition of the cross-appeal. 

 FOR THE COURT 

 June 5, 2007 /s/ Richard Linn 

 Date Richard Linn 

 Circuit Judge 

cc: Scott R. Brown, Esq. 

 Robert C. Haldiman, Esq. 

s8 

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2007-1242 only): June 5, 2007 

2007-1218, 2007-1242 - 2 -
No. 10-5118.

#### Jack Willie Dotson, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 904, 131 S. Ct. 244,

178 L. Ed. 2d 162,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6347.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, denied.
No. 10-5333.

#### Christian F. Meister, Petitioner v. Mike Scott, et al.

562 U.S. 915, 131 S. Ct. 278,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6881.

178 L. Ed. 2d 183,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                              
|No chart available.                                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                                                           
|                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                              
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Dominican Republic (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | W      | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Taylor, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 881]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), entered on or about December 4, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Regardless of whether the court properly assessed points for sexual contact under clothing, the record supports the court’s alternative finding that an upward departure was warranted. Even without the points disputed on appeal, the point score of 105 is nearly enough for a level three adjudication, and the risk assessment instrument did not adequately account for defendant’s criminal history, significant risk of recidivism as demonstrated by his pattern of similar behavior, and prior level two adjudication *(see People v Hatcher,*132 AD3d 407 [1st Dept 2015], *lv denied*26 NY3d 915 [2016]; *People v Grassi,*123 AD3d 602 [1st Dept 2014], *lv denied*25 NY3d 902 [2015]).

Concur— Tom, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Gesmer and Singh, JJ.
No. 10-95.

#### In re Saundra J. Counce, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 294,

178 L. Ed. 2d 260,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7767.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
No. 10-5581.

#### Shone E. Wilkes, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 930, 131 S. Ct. 394,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7590.

178 L. Ed. 2d 209,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 376 Fed. Appx. 295.
#### Ely v. Susquehana Aquacultures, Inc.

03/29/2016

977, 978 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 130 A.3d 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,008,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,382,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                   858,030
<INVENTORY>                                     70,047
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,505,459
<PP&E>                                      14,172,231
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,504,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,536,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,894,489
<BONDS>                                      8,396,742
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       659,805
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,435,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,536,858
<SALES>                                     78,460,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            78,460,712
<CGS>                                       59,304,743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,956,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (674,341)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (475,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (475,095)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (475,095)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
No. 09-10871.

#### Ernest Miller, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 854, 131 S. Ct. 116,

178 L. Ed. 2d 71,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6013.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
No. 10-5828.

#### Moises Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 938, 131 S. Ct. 350,

178 L. Ed. 2d 226,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7250.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 145.