alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 231 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 231

To amend the Foreign Trade Zones Act to permit the deferral of payment 
                of duty on certain production equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 27 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Foreign Trade Zones Act to permit the deferral of payment 
                of duty on certain production equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFERRAL OF DUTY ON CERTAIN PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 3 of the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly 
known as the Foreign Trade Zones Act, 19 U.S.C. 81c) is amended by 
adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Production Equipment.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, if all applicable customs laws are complied with (except 
        as otherwise provided in this subsection), merchandise which 
        may be admitted into a foreign trade zone for use within such 
        zone as production equipment, or parts thereof, shall not be 
        subject to duty until such merchandise is completely assembled, 
        installed, tested, and used in the production for which it was 
        admitted. The duty chargeable shall be at the same rate as 
        would have been imposed (but for the provisions of this 
        subsection) on such production machinery and related equipment, 
        and parts thereof, (taking into account the zone status of the 
        merchandise) had duty been imposed on such production machinery 
        and related equipment, and parts thereof, at the time of entry 
        into the customs territory of the United States.
            ``(2) Foreign trade zone.--For purposes of this subsection, 
        the term `foreign trade zone' includes a subzone as defined in 
        section 146.1(b)(17) of chapter 19, Code of Federal 
        Regulations.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, after the date that is 15 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
No. 09-11524.

#### Bobby R. Durham, Petitioner v. Charlie Crist, Governor of Florida, et al.

562 U.S. 885, 131 S. Ct. 214,

178 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6777.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2268

To provide for the establishment of a working group on trade-related worker

rights and labor standards as part of the General Agreement on Tariffs

and Trade, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. WOFFORD (for himself, Mr. BRADLEY, Mr. RIEGLE, Mrs. BOXER, Mr.

METZENBAUM, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. DODD,

Mr. KERRY, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. LEVIN) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To provide for the establishment of a working group on

trade-related worker rights and labor standards as part

of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Worker Rights and

5 Labor Standards Trade Act of 1994’’.
2

•S 2268 IS

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF WORKING GROUP ON WORKER

2 RIGHTS.

3 (a) ACTION BY THE PRESIDENT.—The President

4 shall seek the establishment as part of the GATT of a

5 working group to examine the relationship of fundamental,

6 internationally recognized worker rights to the articles, ob7 jectives, and related instruments of the GATT.

8 (b) OBJECTIVES OF WORKING GROUP.—The objec9 tives of the working group described in subsection (a)

10 are—

11 (1) to explore ways to link the conduct of inter12 national trade and respect for fundamental, inter13 nationally recognized worker rights;

14 (2) to examine the economic impact of trade

15 distortions that are attributable to the systematic

16 denial of fundamental, internationally recognized

17 worker rights;

18 (3) to consider and develop information on the

19 incidence and effects of systematic, trade-distorting

20 worker rights practices and ways to address such

21 practices; and

22 (4) to establish a procedure for preventing any

23 country or industry from gaining a competitive ad24 vantage in international trade through the system25 atic denial of fundamental, internationally recog26 nized worker rights.
3

•S 2268 IS

1 (c) ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDING COMMITTEE ON

2 WORKER RIGHTS WITHIN THE WORLD TRADE ORGANI3 ZATION.—At such time as the World Trade Organization

4 becomes effective, the President shall seek the establish5 ment in the World Trade Organization of a standing com6 mittee on worker rights to which the functions and objec7 tives of the working group described in section 3 shall be

8 transferred.

9 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

10 For purposes of this Act:

11 (1) The term ‘‘fundamental, internationally rec12 ognized worker rights’’ shall have the meaning as

13 defined in section 502(a)(4) of the Trade Act of

14 1974.

15 (2) GATT.—The term ‘‘GATT’’ means the

16 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.

Æ
# Sanford assumes command of DLA Aviation

/ Published July 11, 2019
RICHMOND, VA, 
Air Force Brig. Gen. David Sanford became the 33rd Defense Logistics Agency Aviation commander during a change of command ceremony held in the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, July 9.

Sanford previously served as associate director, Directorate of Resource Integration, Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, Engineering and Force Protection, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C., where he assisted the director in the planning, programming and budgeting of weapons systems sustainment, vehicles and support equipment, logistics and installation resource requirements.

He takes over from Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry, the first female commander of DLA Aviation. Hurry is headed up to Washington, D.C. and will be the next director of logistics for the U. S. Air Force.

Distinguished guests in attendance for the ceremony included Air Force Maj. Gen. Allan Day, former DLA Aviation commander, now director of Logistics Operations, DLA Headquarters, Fort Belvoir, Virginia; Navy Rear Adm. John Palmer, commander, DLA Land and Maritime, Columbus, Ohio; Army Brig. Gen. James Ring, director of the Joint Staff, Virginia National Guard, Richmond, Virginia.

Members of the DLA Aviation Hall of Fame were also in attendance, as were friends, family, DSCR and tenant commands employees, industry and community partners.

DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams officiated the ceremony, during which, he offered his sincere gratitude to Hurry for all of her hard work and dedication in support of the nation’s warfighters.  

“Linda, your leadership of DLA Aviation over these two years has been masterful. On behalf of DLA, I want to thank you for a job well done,” Williams said.

Williams presented Hurry with the Defense Superior Service Medal for her superior service as commander, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and unwavering support to the warfighter.

During her farewell speech, Hurry expressed her gratitude to the workforce she led for two years.

“Thanks for allowing me to be a part of this amazing team. Thanks for all the wonderful support you’ve given the warfighter across the globe. Thanks for doing the right thing. Thanks for caring and thanks for taking care of each other,” she said.

Hurry then relinquished command of DLA Aviation by passing the organizational flag to Williams, who then passed the flag to Sanford. This evolution signifies the passing of authority, responsibility, trust and mission from the senior commander to the new commander.

Sanford, in his first official speech to the workforce as commander, kept his words short but made a powerful statement as to his expectations during his tenure.

“To the men and women of DLA Aviation, we are one team of brothers and sisters in this profession of arms, a team made up of diverse service members and families that proudly and honorably serve our nation. I look forward to serving with you on this winning team, and I challenge you to make our organization even better!” he said.
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF AMERIPATH, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of AmeriPath, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Donald E. Steen, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Donald E. SteenDonald E. SteenChief Executive OfficerAmeriPath, Inc.March 17, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[MT-926-08-1420-00]


Montana: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Montana State Office, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plat of survey of the following described land is 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Montana State Office, Billings, 
Montana, thirty (30) days from the date of this publication.

Black Hills Meridian, South Dakota

T. 5 S., R. 9 E.

    The plat, in three sheets, representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the south boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines, 
and the adjusted original meanders of the left and right banks of the 
South Fork of the Cheyenne River through sections 22, 27, 28, and 33, 
and the subdivision of sections 27, 28, and 33, and the survey of the 
last thread, the medial line, and certain partition lines of the 
abandoned channel of the South Fork of the Cheyenne River in sections 
28 and 33, and a division of accretion line in section 27, and the new 
meanders of a portion of the left and right banks of the South Fork of 
the Cheyenne River through sections 22, 27, 28, and 33, Township 5 
South, Range 9 East, Black Hills Meridian, South Dakota, was accepted 
May 29, 1998.
    This survey was executed at the request of the U.S. Forest Service, 
Custer National Forest, and was necessary to identify lands 
administered by the U.S. Forest Service.
    A copy of the preceding described plat will be immediately placed 
in the open files and will be available to the public as a matter of 
information.
    If a protest against this survey, as shown on this plat, is 
received prior to the date of the official filing, the filing will be 
stayed pending consideration of the protest. This particular plat will 
not be officially filed until the day after all protests have been 
accepted or dismissed and become final or appeals from the dismissal 
affirmed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 222 North 
32nd Street, P.O. Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107-6800.

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
Steven G. Schey,
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Resources.
[FR Doc. 98-15773 Filed 6-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
Attachment J:

Partner Annual Assessment Form

–

Comments
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2024 11 17756 2024 21 480603 2024 31 259551 2024 32 86712 2024 41 317 2024 42 158 2024 43 2105 2024 51 232 2024 52 14344 2024 53 2286 2024 54 3428 2024 61 3047 2024 62 4455
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Pena, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 324]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered November 21, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 41/2 to 9 years and 3 to 6 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. There was ample evidence of possession of drugs with intent to sell, including the officers’ observation of defendant exchanging an object for money, the drugs recovered from defendant’s person, and the manner in which the drugs were packaged *(see People v Ranson,*251 AD2d 263 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 985 [1998]). We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Sullivan, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE PUBLIC COMPANY
ACCOUNTING REFORM AND INVESTOR PROTECTION ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED)
  1.
    
    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of operations
of the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.
  /s/ Dan W. Denney, Jr.
Dan
W. Denney, Jr.
    
    /s/ John M. Vuko
John
M. VukoChief Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-1563.

#### Chaya Ungar, et al., Petitioners v. New York City Housing Authority.

562 U.S. 840, 131 S. Ct. 211,

178 L. Ed. 2d 46,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5800.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 53.
---

CONSENT OF AUTHORG.J. van der Heever,
Pr.Sci.Nat.GeoLogix Mineral Exploration Consultants (Pty) Ltd.PO Box 20,
Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa

US Securities and Exchange Commission

I, G.J. van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat., certify that I have read
the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that
there are any misrepresentations in the information provided to the Company by
GeoLogix Mineral Exploration Consultants (Pty) Ltd. in the written disclosure in
the Form 20F of Anooraq Resources Corporation.

I do hereby consent to the filing with the regulatory
authorities.

Dated this 1stday of July, 2009.

|/signed/ G.J.
      van der Heever                 
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|G.J. van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat.                   
|GeoLogix Mineral Exploration Consultants (Pty) Ltd.

---
Exhibit 12.

                            MOBIL CORPORATION
            COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (In millions)

                                                                       Nine
                                                                       Months
                                                                       Ended
                                      Year Ended December 31,          Sept. 30,
                           ------------------------------------------ --------
                            1994     1995    1996     1997     1998     1999
                           ------   ------  ------   ------   ------   ------

Income Before Change in
  Accounting Principle ... $1,759   $2,376  $2,964   $3,272   $1,704   $1,901
Add:
Income taxes .............  1,919    2,015   3,147    3,093    1,356    1,059
Portion of rents
  representative of
  interest factor ........    340      368     376      346      317      238
Interest and debt
  discount expense .......    461      467     455      428      451      254
Earnings (greater) less
  than distributions from
  equity affiliates.......    (40)     (51)    153      (59)     329       43
                           ------   ------   ------  ------   ------   ------

Income as Adjusted ....... $4,439   $5,175  $7,095   $7,080   $4,157   $3,495
                           ======   ======  ======   ======   ======   ======
Fixed Charges:
Interest and debt
  discount expense ....... $  461   $  467  $  455   $  428   $  451   $  254
Capitalized interest .....     37       47      78      101       74       78
Portion of rents
  representative of
  interest factor ........    340      368     376      346      317      238
                           ------   ------  ------   ------   ------   ------
Total Fixed Charges ...... $  838   $  882  $  909   $  875   $  842   $  570
                           ======   ======  ======   ======   ======   ======
Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges ..........    5.3      5.9     7.8      8.1      4.9      6.1
                           ======   ======  ======   ======   ======   ======


Note:

  For the years ended December 31, 1994,  1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 and the nine
months ended September 30, 1999, Fixed Charges exclude $37 million, $28 million,
$24 million, $29 million, $25 million and $21 million, respectively, of interest
expense  attributable to debt issued by the Mobil Oil Corporation Employee Stock
Ownership Plan Trust and guaranteed by Mobil.


MOBIL                                 - 24 -

<PAGE>
No. 09-1409.

#### John J. Warren, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Insurance Company.

562 U.S. 832, 131 S. Ct. 115,

178 L. Ed. 2d 32,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6382.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 670.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Friday, June 30, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor, Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-14963 Filed 6-2-98; 11:20 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### People ex rel. Stokes v New York State Div. of Parole

4th Dept: 144 AD3d 1550

denied*
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Kerry R. Hicks, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Health Grades, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or cause such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: March 17, 2008     By:  /s/ Kerry R. Hicks    Name:  Kerry R. Hicks    Title:  Chairman, President and