alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 98-4312

ANTHONY CLIVE REID,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge.

(CR-96-108)

Submitted: December 22, 1998

Decided: January 15, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and KING, Circuit Judges, and

HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Randy V. Cargill, MAGEE, FOSTER, GOLDSTEIN & SAYERS,

P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United

States Attorney, Sharon Burnham, Assistant United States Attorney,

Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Clive Reid pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent

to distribute and to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, see 21 U.S.C.

§ 846 (1994). Reid was sentenced on December 9, 1997. At the sentencing hearing, the district court informed Reid that, if he wished to

appeal, the appeal must be filed within ten days. The judgment order

was entered on December 11, 1997. On April 20, 1998, Reid's pro se

notice of appeal (dated April 12, 1998) and motion for leave to note

an appeal out of time were entered in the district court. The district

court denied Reid's motion.

Rule 4(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires a

notice of appeal to be filed within ten days of judgment. The district

court may extend the time for filing a notice of appeal for thirty days

upon a showing of excusable neglect with or without a motion being

filed. The district court may not otherwise extend the time for filing

a notice of appeal. See United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351 (4th Cir.

1985); United States v. Schuchardt, 685 F.2d 901 (4th Cir. 1982).

Reid's notice of appeal and motion for leave to file a late notice of

appeal were filed in April 1998, over four months after the entry of

judgment. The notice of appeal was ineffective and the district court

was without authority to extend the time for filing beyond forty days

after the entry of judgment. Consequently, we are without jurisdiction

to hear the appeal. See United States v. Raynor , 939 F.2d 191, 197

(4th Cir. 1991).

We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Reid's

motion for leave to file a pro se supplemental brief is granted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

 2
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 3
No. 09-11515.

#### Henry E. Patterson, Jr., Petitioner v. Robert P. Houston, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, et al.

562 U.S. 885, 131 S. Ct. 213,

178 L. Ed. 2d 128,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6972.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
No. 09-10950.

#### Yigal Adir, Petitioner v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al.

562 U.S. 857, 131 S. Ct. 123,

178 L. Ed. 2d 75,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5963,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Anthony S. Albanese, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Michigan HeritageBancorp, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 8, 2004 /s/ Anthony S. Albanese   Anthony S. Albanese President, Chief Operating Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer
55
No. 09-11511.

#### Keith Desmond Taylor, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 885, 131 S. Ct. 212,

178 L. Ed. 2d 128,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7104.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 47 Cal. 4th 850, 102 Cal. Rptr. 3d 852, 220 P.3d 872.
#### Estate of Deckard v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Bd.; Malt Beverage Distributors Association v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Bd.; Duffer’s Beverage, LLC v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Bd; Mechanicsburg Distributing, Inc., 6485 Carlisle Pike Associates, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Li*680quor Control Bd.

08/30/2016

651, 830, 849, 850, 851, 852, 853, 854, 855 MAL (2015), 115 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 121 A.3d 1173
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

DANIEL LUKE SPUCK, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 65 & 66 WM 2015 

 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2015, the Application for Bail is DENIED.
#### Com. v. Ricciardi 25

05/11/2016

27 WAL (2016)

25

. Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 663
No. 09-9300.

#### In re Gregory Taylor, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 822, 131 S. Ct. 380,

178 L. Ed. 2d 16,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6378.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Qwest on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q/A. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/RICHARD C. NOTEBAERTRichard C. Notebaert
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/OREN G. SHAFFEROren G. Shaffer
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer                

---



QuickLinks
No. 10-5218.

#### Dwight Thomas, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 909, 131 S. Ct. 259,

178 L. Ed. 2d 172,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7087.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 593 F.3d 752.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

The following is a list of all of the subsidiaries of CoBiz Financial Inc. and the names, other than their proper corporate names, under which they do business:

 

1.     CoBiz Bank, a Colorado state-chartered bank owned 100% by CoBiz Financial Inc., doing business as Colorado Business        Bank and Arizona Business Bank.

 

2.     Financial Designs, Ltd., a Colorado corporation owned 100% by CoBiz Financial Inc.

 

3.     CoBiz Insurance, Inc., a Colorado corporation owned 100% by CoBiz Financial Inc.

 

4.     CoBiz GMB, Inc., a Colorado corporation owned 100% by CoBiz Financial Inc. and the sole general partner of Green        Manning & Bunch, Ltd., a Colorado limited partnership.

 

5.     CoBiz ACMG, Inc., a Colorado corporation owned 100% by CoBiz Financial Inc. and the sole owner of Alexander Capital        Management Group, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company.

 

6.     Wagner Investment Management, Inc., a Colorado corporation, owned 100% by CoBiz Financial, Inc.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-171]


Peco Energy Company, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unit 1; 
Public Meeting

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will conduct a public 
meeting in the Delta Area Community Senior Center, located in the Delta 
Community Building, 5 Pendyrus Street, Suite 1, Delta, Pennsylvania, on 
June 29, 1998, to discuss PECO Energy Company's plans to complete 
decommissioning of its Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unit 1 (Peach 
Bottom Unit 1) Delta, Pennsylvania. The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. 
and will be facilitated by Mr. Francis X. Cameron, NRC's Special 
Counsel for Public Liaison and Agreement State Programs. This meeting 
will include a short presentation by the NRC staff on the 
decommissioning process, and a presentation by PECO Energy Company on 
the status of Peach Bottom Unit 1 and PECO Energy Company's plans to 
complete decommissioning of this facility. There will be an opportunity 
for members of the public to make comments and question the NRC staff 
and/or PECO Energy representatives. The public meeting will be 
transcribed.
    PECO Energy Company by letter dated March 27, 1998, submitted the 
Peach Bottom Unit 1 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) for NRC 
review. This FSAR (NUDOCS accession number 9804130097) describes the 
current condition of the facility.
    The Peach Bottom Unit 1 FSAR is available for public inspection at 
the Peach Bottom local public document room (LPDR) located at the 
Government Publications Section, State Library of Pennsylvania, 
(REGIONAL DEPOSITORY) Education Building, Walnut Street and 
Commonwealth Avenue, Box 1601, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105, and at 
the Commission's Public Document Room located at the Gelman Building, 
2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037.
    For more information, contact Mr. Stewart W. Brown, Project 
Manager, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, Division 
of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or call 
him, at (301) 415-6605.

    Dated at Rockville, MD, this 29th day of May 1998.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John W.N. Hickey,
Chief, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, Division of 
Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 98-15044 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
# Disposition Services celebrates Women's History Month 2022

/ Published March 25, 2022
BATTLE CREEK, Mich. , 
March is Women's History Month – commemorating and encouraging the study, observance and celebration of the vital role of women in American history. Please take a few moments to view Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services employees speak about the women who inspired them.

11:20VIDEO  | 11:20 |Women's History Month Special Emphasis Video
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory A. Serrao,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, of American Dental Partners, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|/s/ GREGORY A. SERRAO                                             
|Gregory A. Serrao, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|March 10, 2006
2017-0032.

#### State v. Stevens.

Muskingum App. No. CT2016-0055, 2016-Ohio-8568. Discretionary appeal accepted and held for decision in 2016-0215, *State v. Grimes,*and briefing schedule stayed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the “Company”) herebycertifies to my knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or“filed” for any purpose whatsoever.           Date: August 16, 2004 Name: /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton          Sheldon C. Fenton       Title: Chief Executive Officer and         Acting Chief Financial Officer    
31
# Qatar site makes use of mobile disposal team to complete the mission

/ Published Oct. 9, 2022
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
As the nation’s combat logistics support agency, the Defense Logistics Agency is responsible for operating in locations all over the world in support of the warfighter. To be agile and support the need, DLA Disposition Services must maintain full operability and if necessary, use non-traditional methods.

The DLA Disposition Services site in Qatar identified an unserviceable commercial rough terrain container handler for disposal, but due to its extreme size and weight were unable to move the piece of equipment to the disposal site for processing.

“No cranes on the base had this type of lift capacity,” said Jhunar Medenilla, the acting site lead for Qatar. “Due to the weight of the RTCH, the best option was to execute cutting operations in place – and cut this into manageable and transportable pieces for removal.”   

Medenilla shared that the Qatar site does not typically see equipment this large – as the RTCH weighed in at over 160,000 lbs. – so the site put together a mobile team to dispose of the equipment.

“Large material handling equipment are occasional turn-ins but excellent removal weight for the site,” Medenilla said. “Safety and transportability are the key factors used to determine a mobile cutting team.”

Facing multiple challenges – including maintaining a safe operation – the mobile team consisted of four cutters, two laborers and two material handling equipment operators.

“The most challenging part was coordinating the cutting operations,” Medenilla said. “Ensuring proper safety measures where followed and oversight was present for the entire operation.”

Medenilla and his team were able to complete the project in four days with DLA personnel rather than having to contract the work to an outside agency.
No. 12-8054.

#### Green v. Neven, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darrell B. Lee, ChiefFinancial Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MOCON,Inc.

Date:  August 14, 2006

 
| /s/ Darrell B. Lee      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Darrell B. Lee          |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32998-32999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16027]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 980318066-8066-01; I.D. 061198B]


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast 
Multispecies Fishery; Commercial Cod Harvest

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Reduction of cod landing limit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS issues this notification to announce that the 
Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), has 
projected that 892 metric tons (mt) of the target total allowable catch 
(TAC) for the Gulf of Maine (GOM) cod stock will be harvested as of 
2400 hrs, local time, June 24, 1998, and that vessels fishing under a 
non-exempt multispecies days-at-sea (DAS) may not possess more than 400 
lb (181.4 kg) of cod per DAS for any trip ending on or after 0001 hrs, 
local time, June 25, 1998.

DATES: Effective 0001 hrs, local time, June 25, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan A. Murphy, Fishery Policy 
Analyst, 978-281-9252.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations implementing Framework 
Adjustment 25 (63 FR 15326, March 31, 1998) became effective May 1, 
1998. To ensure that GOM cod landings remain within the target TAC of 
1,783 mt established for the 1998 fishing year, Framework 25 provides a 
mechanism to reduce the 700-lb (317.5-kg) per DAS landing limit to as 
low as 400-lb (181.4-kg) per DAS, based on the rate of catch and the 
risk of exceeding the target TAC. Section 648.86(b)(1)(i) specifies 
that this mechanism is triggered when the Regional Administrator has 
projected that 892 mt will be harvested. Further, this section 
stipulates that NMFS will publish notification in the

[[Page 32999]]

Federal Register informing the public of the date of the reduction.
    Based on the available information, the Regional Administrator has 
projected that 892 mt will be reached on 2400 hrs, local time, June 24, 
1998. Given the ratio rate at which this trigger amount was reached, 
the Regional Administrator has determined that the landing limit must 
be reduced to the lowest authorized level. Therefore, the cod landing 
limit, pursuant to Sec. 648.86(b)(1)(i), has been reduced to 400 lb 
(181.4 kg) per DAS, except as provided under Sec. 648.86(b)(1)(ii) and 
(b)(2) for any trip ending on or after 0001 hrs, local time, June 25, 
1998.

Classification

    This action is required by 50 CFR part 648 and is exempt from 
review under E.O. 12286.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
Gary Matlock,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-16027 Filed 6-12-98; 9:51 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
No. 09-1379.

#### Micaela Zacatelco Hijuilt and Jorge Rojas Cortez, Petitioners v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 831, 131 S. Ct. 103,

178 L. Ed. 2d 30,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6351.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
# German national employees recognized for 35 years of service

/ Published Dec. 17, 2019
KAISERSLAUTERN, Germany, 
Two host nation civilian employees who work for the Defense Logistics Agency in Kaiserslautern, Germany, were recognized for 35 years of service to the U.S. government.

Isolde Hart and Barbara Nagel work for DLA Troop Support Europe & Africa and were recognized during a ceremony Dec. 6 at Ramstein Air Base. Although Nagel was unable to attend the ceremony.

Hart is a tailored vendor logistics specialist and has worked for DLA Troop Support for nine years. She regularly works with military customers in the Middle East to ensure they receive subsistence support, including food and bottled water.

Nagel has worked as a contract specialist in several commodities and is now a subsistence contracting officer. She previously managed the contract to relocate the Troop Support Europe & Africa office from Kastel, Germany to Kaiserslautern, overseeing every step of the successful move.

“This recognition for their time in service is an important accomplishment personally for Barbara and Isolde,” Army Lt. Col. Sherdrick Rankin, DLA Troop Support Europe & Africa commander, said. “It’s even more significant for DLA, because of the knowledge and experience they contribute to our warfighter support mission and the continuity they provide for our organization.”

The 86th Force Support Squadron at Ramstein annually recognizes host nation employees from DLA, the Air Force and the Defense Commissary Agency for their service to the U.S. government.