alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Distribution Commander delivers Memorial Day message

/ Published May 26, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Distribution Teammates,

As Memorial Day draws near, I ask each of you to give pause and reflect upon the sacrifices of the men and women who gave the last full measure in the service of our great Nation.  

More than 50 million Americans have served in our armed forces from the time of the American Revolution to the present and of that number, over one million perished fighting for the values we so tightly hold – courage, character, duty, and sacrifice.

When thinking of Memorial Day, I recall the words of our former President, Ronald Reagan, who said in part, “...And if words cannot repay the debt we owe...surely with our actions we must strive to keep faith with them and with the vision that led them to battle and to final sacrifice."

Many of you will spend time with your family and friends this weekend.  Take one minute of silence to honor our fallen heroes at 3:00 PM local time, 29 MAY as part of the annual National Moment of Remembrance to remember those who have died in military service to America.

Whatever you plan this extended weekend, please include safety at the forefront of all you do.  Mr. Knight and I thank you for everything you do to keep our Warfighters supplied.  We are proud to be part of this great team...there are truly none better.
# Collaborating for success: DLA Troop Support hosts Headquarters National Account Managers to strengthen partnership

/ Published March 4, 2022
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support hosted the DLA Headquarters National Account Manager team March 3 in Philadelphia where they were able to collaborate in-person and strengthen a partnership that ensures DLA delivers the best warfighter support possible to its customers.

National Account Manager teams for the Army, Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force stay in contact with logisticians and planners at the Defense Department-level to help align DLA goals with those of service leaders. DLA customer and warfighter support representatives are also co-located with customers at the tactical level to help solve everyday problems like supply shortages and last-minute requirements.
EXHIBIT 31.1RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002I, Sheldon C. Fenton certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Veridien Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth physical quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:   August 14, 2007 /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton   Sheldon C. Fenton,   Chief Executive Officer
Second Amendment


 EXHIBIT 10.57(c) 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE (with Escrow Instructions) AND 
 LEASEBACK 
  
 Amendment made as of this 1st day of
June, 2004 by and between THE PRICE GROUP, LLC, a California limited liability company (referred to herein as “Purchaser”) and PRICESMART, INC., a Delaware corporation, as agent for and on behalf of its wholly-owned (through
a subsidiary company) subsidiary Inmobiliaria PriceSmart, S.A., a Dominican Republic company (referred to herein as “Seller”) 
  
 Recitals 
  
 A) Purchaser and Seller are parties to an Agreement of Purchase and Sale (with Escrow Instructions) and Leaseback dated May 6, 2004 as amended by a letter dated May 20, 2004 (collectively the “Agreement”)

  
 B) Purchaser and Seller wish to further amend the Agreement as provided
herein. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree that the
Agreement is amended as follows: 
  
 1. All words and terms used herein shall
have the same meaning as in the Agreement unless otherwise specified. 
  
 2. The
time period for either Purchaser or Seller to terminate the Agreement, under Section 1.04(C) the Agreement, is hereby extended up to and including July 13, 2004. 
  
 3. Section 4.02 is amended by substituting “seventy (70) days” in place of “thirty (30) business days.” 
  
 4. Section 2.03(B) is amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “(B) Within seventy (70) days after the Effective Date the Boards of
Directors of PriceSmart, Inc., and Inmobiliaria PriceSmart, S.A. and/or an authorized Committee of such Boards, have approved the final terms and conditions of the sale to Purchaser of the Subject Property under this Agreement.” 
  
 5. Subject to the amendments herein the Agreement remains in full force and effect.

  
 Executed on the date first written above. 
  

							
	 PURCHASER

	 	 SELLER


		
	The Price Group, LLC	 	 PriceSmart, Inc., as Agent on behalf of its
 wholly-owned subsidiary PriceSmart
 Inmobiliaria, S.A.

				
	 by
	 	 /s/ Jim Cahill

	 	 by
	 	 /s/ Robert M. Gans


	 	 	 its Manager
	 	 	 	 its Executive Vice President
# Aviation hosts celebration in recognition of the Navy’s 247th birthday

/ Published Oct. 14, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
In honor of the U.S. Navy’s 247th birthday, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Customer Operations Directorate, Navy Customer Facing Division, hosted a celebration in the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, Oct. 13.

Birthday festivities included the playing of the National Anthem and a message from Navy Adm. Mike Gilday, chief of naval operations and Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy, James Honea.

The celebration ended staying true to Navy tradition with the cutting of the birthday cake by the guest of honor along with the oldest and youngest sailors in attendance.

“Traditionally, a sword is used to cut the cake as a reminder that we are a band of warriors, committed to carrying arms so that our Nation may live in peace,” said Navy Cmdr. Jonathan Schumann, operations officer, DLA Aviation Customer Operations Directorate, Navy Customer Facing Division, who served as the master of ceremonies.

The theme of this year’s celebration is “On Watch – 24/7 for 247 Years,” and highlights the Navy’s enduring ability to remain fully ready to respond to and effectively deter emanating threats.

“Together we continue to stand the watch and prepare for combat 24-hours a day, seven days a week as we have for the past 247 years,” Gilday said.
#### St. Hilaire v. Office of Open Records (Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections); Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections, In re 41

04/06/2016

976 MAL (2015)

41

. Justice WECHT notes his dissent.

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 128 A.3d 859
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-25-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-05-2000
<CASH>                                       4,413,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    518,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,287,000
<PP&E>                                      55,116,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,547,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,469,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,442,000
<BONDS>                                     52,035,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           30,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,469,000
<SALES>                                     18,719,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,719,000
<CGS>                                       11,110,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,171,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (52,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,162,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (672,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            675,000
<DISCONTINUED>                               (137,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (538,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 15

- 00385

- CR Raymond ZAPATA , Appellant

v. The State of TexasAppellee The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR 6346 Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 29, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, defendant pled guilty to aggravated robbery and was sentenced within the terms of the plea bargain. The trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal

. ”
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rul es.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, on July 16, 2015 , this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court04

- 15

- 00385

- CR

- 2

- certification that shows defendant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d); 37.1.
On July 20 , 20 15 , defenda nt’s appellate counsel filed a response to our order stating he was

“ compelled to concede that [d efendant] has no right of appeal from the underlying criminal case” and that this court “may dismiss th is appeal for that reason .” In light of the record presented, we agree with defendant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this ap peal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM Do not p ublish
No. 09-1387.

#### Capitol House Preservation Company, L.L.C., Petitioner v. Perryman Consultants, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 831, 131 S. Ct. 104,

178 L. Ed. 2d 30,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6155.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit, denied.

Same case below, 47 So. 3d 408.
No. 09-9509.

#### Luther Leon Austin, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 949, 131 S. Ct. 68,

178 L. Ed. 2d 245,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7706.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 10-5259.

#### Lakeithon M. Hall, aka Lakeithan Hall, Petitioner v. McKither Bodison, Warden.

562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 267,

178 L. Ed. 2d 176,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6915.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 361 Fed. Appx. 498.
#### Com. v. Hogan

09/15/2015

270 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1128
#### Sung Hwan Co., Ltd., Appellant, v Rite Aid Corporation, Respondent.

[52 NYS3d 627]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered March 2, 2015, after a nonjury trial, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action pursuant to CPLR article 53 to enforce a foreign money judgment, plaintiff had the burden of establishing jurisdiction *(Venegas v Capric Clinic,*147 AD3d 457 [1st Dept 2017]; *Derso v Volkswagen of Am.,*159 AD2d 937, 938 [4th Dept 1990]). On the record before us, we cannot conclude that Supreme Court erred in determining that plaintiff failed to do so. Specifically at issue was whether defendant operated *595or controlled an ice cream factory owned by a subsidiary that allegedly supplied listeria-tainted ice cream to plaintiff in South Korea. The record does not support a conclusion that Supreme Court erred in determining that defendant did not operate or control the ice cream factory directly or through a subsidiary acting as a “department” of defendant *(see Volkswagenwerk AG. v Beech Aircraft Corp.,*751 F2d 117, 120 [2d Cir 1984]). Moreover, neither could apparent authority give rise to jurisdiction over defendant here.

Plaintiff relies upon cases from across the country involving defendant. We have reviewed these cases and find them inap-posite. We have also considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Sweeny J.P., Renwick, Andrias and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
#### Ramandeep Badwal, Respondent, v Avtar S. Badwal, Appellant.

Submitted January 23, 2017;

decided March 28, 2017

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*28 NY3d 1067 (2016)].
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Tom Wamberg, certify that:

        1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of
             Clark, Inc.;

        2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
             untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
             fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
             circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
             with respect to the period covered by this report; and

        3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
             financial information included in this report, fairly present in
             all material respects the financial condition, results of
             operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
             periods presented in this report.


Date:  August 19, 2003             /s/ Tom Wamberg
       ---------------             ---------------------------------------------

                                   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           -------------------------------------
No. 09-10061.

#### Alfredo Lucero Garcia, Petitioner v. Arizona.

562 U.S. 843, 131 S. Ct. 75,

178 L. Ed. 2d 51,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5961.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.

Same case below, 224 Ariz. 1, 226 P.3d 370.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Jara, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 663]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mattei, J.), dated February. 11, 2016, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his application for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. The defendant’s contention that his expected deportation constituted a mitigating factor warranting a downward departure is unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant did not raise that ground at the hearing *(see People v Destio,*145 AD3d 1047, 1048 [2016]; *People v Figueroa,*138 AD3d 708, 709 [2016]). In any event, this contention is without merit *(see People v Rubi,*132 AD3d 650, 650 [2015]; *People v Pavia,*121 AD3d 960, 960 [2014]; *People v Kachatov,*106 AD3d 973, 973 [2013]). The mitigating factors that the defendant identified and properly preserved for appellate review either were adequately taken into account by the Sex Offender Registration Act Guidelines or did not warrant a downward departure from the presumptive risk level *(see People v Rose,*146 AD3d 911, 912 [2017]; *People v Uphael,*140 AD3d 1143, 1145 [2016]; *People v Ibarra,*137 AD3d 1097, 1098 [2016]).

Leventhal, J.R, Hinds-Radix, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
No. 09-11415.

#### Margaret L. Wilson, Petitioner v. Kautex.

562 U.S. 879, 131 S. Ct. 194,

178 L. Ed. 2d 117,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6755.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 663.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       515,385,268
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             515,385,268
<CASH>                                      85,977,876
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      16,267,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             993,825,336
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            474,462,796
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       158,033
<OTHER-SE>                                 218,546,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               993,825,336
<PREMIUMS>                                   3,586,930
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         11,331,710
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (16,968)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 539,483
<BENEFITS>                                   7,355,473
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,439,131
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,667,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,950,704
<INCOME-TAX>                                   429,627
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,380,331
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,380,331
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### People v Frazier

2d Dept: 140 AD3d 977 (Queens)

denied 8/25/16 (Fahey, J.)
No. 10-5745.

#### Juan Antonio Gandara-Gonzalez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 936, 131 S. Ct. 341,

178 L. Ed. 2d 222,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7349.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 377 Fed. Appx. 405.
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

# 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

# AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form  20-F of Elbit Systems Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December  31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), the
undersigned, Joseph Ackerman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 28, 2006

| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| |