2007 South Florida Environmental Report Appendix 2-3



# Appendix 2-3: Consideration of Long-Term Climatic Variability in Regional Modeling for SFWMD Planning & Operations

Jayantha Obeysekera, Paul Trimble, Calvin Neidrauer, Chandra Pathak, Joel VanArman, Tommy St rowd and Charles Hall

App. 2-3-1

# Consideration of Long-Term Climatic Variability in Regional Modeling for SFWMD Planning and Operations

Jayantha Obeysekera, Paul Tr imble, Calvin Neidrauer, Chandra Pathak, Joel VanArman, Tommy Strowd and Charles Hall

Draft September 1, 2006 (revised October 30, 2006) South Florida Water Management District

## TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................1

I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................2 Background.....................................................................................................................2 Climatic Variability and Climate Change .......................................................................3 Current Management Issues and Concerns .....................................................................4 Purpose and Scope ..........................................................................................................5

II. Relevant Climatic Indicators .......................................................................................................6
El Niño/Southern Oscillation ..........................................................................................6 Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation ...................................................................................7 Pacific Decadal Oscillation .............................................................................................8 AMO and South Florida’s Climate...............................................................................10 Predictability of AMO ..................................................................................................10 Interacting Effects of Teleconnections .........................................................................12 Other Potential Indicators .............................................................................................13 District Efforts to Understand Teleconnections ............................................................14 III. Role of Models in Planning and Operation ..............................................................................14 IV. AMO Trends in Climate and Hydrologic Data ........................................................................16
Data

............................................................................................................................... 17 Trends in Water-Year Data ...........................................................................................17 Trends in Rainfall-Runoff Relationships ......................................................................20 Trends in Monthly Data ................................................................................................22 Comparison of the SFWMM Modeling Period with the Period of Record ..................28 Lake Okeechobee Net Inflow .......................................................................................30 V. Use of Climate Outlook in Operations ......................................................................................34 Lake Okeechobee Regulation Schedule Development .................................................34 Position Analysis ..........................................................................................................37 VI. Incorporation of Climatic Variability in Water Resources Planning .......................................38 Sensitivity Analysis ......................................................................................................39 Continual Expansion of Simulation Period of SFWMM ..............................................40 Role of Adaptive Management in Plan Implementation ...............................................40 V. Summary and Conclusions ........................................................................................................42

VI. Recommendations ....................................................................................................................44

VII. References

............................................................................................................................... 45

i

## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD or District) is an agency of the state of Florida whose mission is to manage and protect water resources of the region by balancing and improving water quality, flood control, natural syst ems, and water supply. Planning of future facilities and their operations is a critical Distri ct function and for such efforts, regional-scale computer models are frequently used. A pr imary public concern is whether the SFWMD appropriately addresses future water management needs in computer modeling for both planning and operations. Long-term climatic variability due to natural causes and climate change due to anthropogenic causes are clearly important fo r planning of facilities and their operations. During the past decade, the District initiated several investigative studies on the causes of climatic variability in southern Florida. In add ition, methods have been developed to successfully incorporate climatic variability and climate ou tlooks into the water resource and operational planning (planning) modes of the central and southe rn Florida flood control system for today and into the future. Regional climatic variability is the result of land/ocean/atmospheric processes interacting at various spatial (regional to global) and temporal (inter-annual to multidecadal) time scales. The correlation of atmospheric variables around the globe to the equatorial Pacific sea surface temperatures (SST) and atmospheric anomalies is one of the most well recognized teleconnections, known as El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Teleconnections are statistically significant correlations between me teorologic variables in various places of the world. Two additional teleconnections recently id entified as influencing climatic variability in South Florida include the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). The AMO and PDO can be recogni zed by SST anomalies in the north Atlantic and north Pacific oceans, respectively. All three of these oscillations ar e quasi-periodic, with varying periods and irregular amplitudes. This ma kes the prediction of a phase change of any of the three in advance very difficult. ENSO has a periodicity that ranges between 3 and 7 years, while the AMO and the PDO have periodicities that range between 10 to 60 and 5 to 20 years, respectively. Significant investment worldwide h as been devoted to predicting the evolution of ENSO and its impacts on global climate. Still th ere is large uncertainty associated with the numerous statistical and dynamic models d esigned to predict the phase of the ENSO phenomenon. This report presents an overview of the first three climate phenomena, to illustrate their influence on South Florida regional climatic conditions. Particular emphasis is placed on AMO, which has figured heavily in recent discussions regarding Lake Ok eechobee operations and planning for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP). Along with analyses of period-of-record trends for both rainfall and Lake Okeechobee net infl ow data, this report discusses the method for incorporating climatic variability into planning decisions. The South Florida Water Management Model (SFWMM), wh ich has undergone multiple peer reviews to confirm its technical credibility, is the primary tool used for system simulation, planning, and performance forecasting. This model was also used for analysis of future projects proposed for CERP and for the development of regional water supply plans. Currently, climatic variability and meteorological conditions that occurred during the 1965–2000 period are used to test various infrastru cture or operational alternatives. The majority of this period represents an AMO cool phase th at was in place from 1970 to 1994. Approximately 11 of the 36 years in this period (1965–196 9 and 1995–2000) represen t conditions from AMO warm phases, that include wet (having above-average seasonal rainfall) and some extreme dry events. Statistical analysis of the data from the 1965–2000 period indicates that the wet periods used in the model are similar to wet periods that may occur during a typical AMO warm phase.

1The conclusion is that the historical period provides appropriate and reasonable estimates of the ranges of climatic conditions that are likely to occur in coming years. The report recommends the continuing expans ion of the period of simulation used in computer modeling, and a feasibility investigati on for using historical data prior to 1965 and possibly synthetic rainfall data for evaluation of plan under a longer period of AMO warm phase. Future work should also include a more refined analysis of rainfall-runoff relationships in the Kissimmee Basin in order to separate those trends due to climatic variability from the effects of upper and lower basin water management. Adaptive management, already a cornerstone of CERP implementation, should be contin ued for re-evaluating facility pl ans and future operations as new data becomes available.



## I. INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD or District) is an agency of the state of Florida that has primary responsibility for management of water resources in a 16-county region that extends from just south of Orlando to Florida Bay. Climate change and variability have been driving forces behind the growth and ev olution of the District since its formation in 1949. The agency was created as the Central a nd Southern Florida Flood Control District, in response to massive flooding that occurred due to a 1948 hurricane, with the primary purpose to safely manage and dispose of excess floodwaters. The District was also the local sponsor for the federal Central and South Florida Project, deve loped by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In 1968, this project was revised for greater emphasis on the development and enhancement of water supplies for public and agricultural uses. In response to this new definition of the project and widespread regional droughts that occurred in the 1950s, 1960s, and early 1970s, the District was renamed in 1973 by the Florida Legislature as the SFWMD and given an additional assignment to provide for environmental protection. The agency’s mission today is to manage and protect water resources of the region by balancing and improving water qua lity, flood control, natural systems, and water supply. To accomplish this mission, the District has broad authority and responsibility to operate and maintain a regional system of nearly 2,000 miles of canals and levees, 546 water control structures, and 51 pump stations; to conduct planning studies to assess present and future environmental, water supply and flood control need s; and to regulate water use and surface water management. A major, relatively new initiative of the SFWMD, in cooperation with the USACE, U.S. Department of the Interior, other state and federal agencies, and local interests, is the ongoing effort to restore the Everglades ecosystem. Planning for this long-term restoration effort began in 1995 and resulted in development of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) (USACE a nd SFWMD, 1999). The plan is designed to meet water management and environmental needs over th e next 50 years and is expected to require more than 20 years to complete construction of facilities at an estimated cost of more than $8 billion. Since 1999, the District and USACE have conducted additional studies to develop details of this plan and initiate design and construction of project facilities to capture, store, and redistribute excess surface water to meet future n eeds. Early in the CERP planning process, it was recognized that long-term climatic variability due to natural or anthropogenic causes could cause significant changes to South Florida’ s hydrology across the 50-year lifetime of this program. Consequently, an effort was undertaken to assess the importance, impacts, and potential implications of climatic variabilit y. The status of climate studies and research

2needed to address these critical i ssues were summarized in a District report in 1996 (SFWMD). Many of these issues and approaches remain relevant today. Planning for the future is a critical District function. To conduct such analyses, the SFWMD uses state-of-the-art communications and engineering technology, combined with technical expertise in a wide range of scientific disciplines. Analysis of alternative planning and operations scenarios and planning for future conditions depends heavily on the collection of data concerning current and past conditions in the region and the use of computer-based simulation models to represent existing and potential future land u se, population, environmental conditions, and alternative management scenarios. The South Florida Water Management Model (SFWMM), a primary tool used to conduct these analyses, is a regional-scale computer model that simulates the hydrology and the management of the water resources system from Lake Okeechobee to Florida Bay. It covers an area of 7,600 square miles using a mesh of cells, each measuring 2 miles square; for this reason, the model is sometimes referred to as the “2x2 model.” The model simulates inflows from Kissimmee River, runoff and demands in the Cal oosahatchee River and St. Lucie Canal basins, and major components of the hydrologic cycle in South Florida, including rainfall, evapotranspiration, infiltration, overland and groundwater flow , canal flow, canal-groundwater seepage, levee seepage, and groundwater pumping. It incorporates current or proposed water management control structures and curre nt or proposed operational rules. As a planning tool, the SFWMM can be used to predict the response of the water control system to climatic conditions and proposed cha nges in hydraulic infrastructure and/or operating rules. The model design takes into considerati on distinct hydrologic and geologic features of subtropical South Florida, which include (1) the strong interaction between canals and the highly permeable surficial aquifer, especially in the eastern portion of the region and (2) the effects of rainfall, evapotranspiration, overland flow, and groundwater movement within the Water Conservation Areas (WCAs) and Everglades Na tional Park (ENP). The SFWMM integrates hydrologic processes with the hydraulic infrast ructure and associated policy-based rules and guidelines related to water management in South Florida. To develop CERP, the District used the SFWMM with historical environmental, land use, and hydrologic data along with the technical expertise of numerous scientists and engineers, to evaluate appropriate initial design features for regional facilities and operations.



### CLIMATIC VARIABILITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE Climate in any region is the result of both s hort- and long-term phenomena interacting at local, regional, and global scales. A weather an omaly that persists for extended periods is recognized as a climate shift or as long-term climatic variability. If the climate shift is likely to persist to the foreseeable future and is due to anthropogenic causes, it is defined here as a climate change. Reasons for climate patterns, shifts, and changes are not completely understood, therefore, significant uncertainties are as sociated with forecasting conditions. The ongoing controversy over global warming unde rscores the challenge in distinguishing threshold points at which climate fluctuations beco me shifts or changes. Once a longer-term trend is established, the challenge is to determine whethe r the trend is due to effects of natural climatic variability, various thermal cycles in the oceans a nd atmosphere, variations in solar flux, changes in atmospheric chemical composition due to human activities, or a combination of factors. Therefore, the relative influence of anthropogenic and natural factors on global weather patterns remains a highly debated topic. Not only are the causes of global warming uncerta in, but also the effects. Increased thermal energy in the oceans and atmosphere does not neces sarily lead to increased temperatures across

3the globe, or to increased rainfall in South Florid a. In fact, some recent studies suggest that the increase in energy due to global warming may cause more extreme temperature fluctuations, more severe droughts, and increased storm activity. Wet regions of the earth could become much drier and dry regions could become much wetter. In view of the current uncertain state of science, this paper does not address the topic of climat e change. However, the SFWMD has conducted sensitivity analysis of its plans through computer modeling for such climate change scenarios and sea-level rise and increased rainfall due to global warming. Climate anomalies observed in South Florida during recent years may represent some combination of effects due to natural climatic variability and long-term shifts, and possibly an overall global warming trend, perhaps modified to some degree by effects of human activities. Small shifts in weather patterns can change th e net rainfall (rainfall minus evapotranspiration) from a surplus to a deficit or vice versa without being noticed. However, if these weather patterns persist over the region for an extended period, they can produce significant excesses or deficits that water managers must deal with prudently. Decisions are typically based on minimizing impacts and/or maximizing benefits to natural systems, water supplies, and flood protection. During the 1970s and 1980s, little was understood a bout global climatic variability or how to apply relevant data to water r esource planning or systems operation. At that time, engineers and scientists at the SFWMD were trying to compre hend a climate shift that occurred throughout South Florida during the late 1960s (Shih, 1983). The cause of the shift was highly debated. Most scientists hypothesized that increased drainage and development or accumulation of greenhouse gases and global warming were the principal fact ors. Information now suggests that the climate shift in the late 1960s was associated with a ph ase change of the AMO (Trimble et al., 1998b; Enfield et al., 2001). Since that time, the Distri ct has been actively invo lved in conducting and supporting research and developing new technologies to incorporate of global, regional, and local climate factors into District planning and op erations. The District has conducted multidecadal programs to implement some of these research findings and improve predictive capabilities and the efficiency of South Florida’s complex water management systems. Many of these efforts are described in this report.



### CURRENT MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND CONCERNS A primary public concern is whether the SFWMD has appropriately addressed future water management needs in its operations, planning, and design efforts. Has the District has considered long-term climate variability, especially rainfall, in its planning and opera tions of future water management facilities, such as those associated with CERP? Most of the proposed CERP projects are evaluated based on model simulations that use a 36-year period (1965–2000) of rainfall, hydrologic and water management records. Recent data indicate that climatic conditions may be shifting in response to warmer North Atlantic sea surface temperatures that tend to produce greater annual rainfall in central and southern Fl orida, and greater variability in annual rainfall. This phenomenon, characterized by the AMO index, is long-term in nature, possibly lasting for multiple decades. The effects of increased rainfall are nonlinear, that is, as the rainfa ll rate increases, soils become saturated, and storage facilities reach cap acity, the proportion that becomes surface water runoff tends to increase rapidly. These conditions create a correspondingly greater need for additional water storage and/or disposal options during extended periods of high rainfall. This issue is of special concern for Lake Okeec hobee, which is the largest natural reservoir for long-term water storage. During the past several years, the Lake has experienced consistently high water levels and le vels of turbidity due to above- normal rainfall and several major hurricanes. These persistent high water and a dverse water quality conditions have severely damaged Lake fisheries and littoral zone vege tation. Water managers were compelled to

4discharge large amounts of water to major outlets through the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie rivers in 2004 and 2005, resulting in significant damage to downstream coastal and estuarine resources. Naturally, a climatic regime characterized by abov e normal rainfall and consequently runoff from tributary watersheds is a concern for management of the water resources system in South Florida. Based on these considerations, several key qu estions concerning how SFWMD has dealt with long-term climatic variability in planning and operations were defined as follows:
1. Has the District adequately addressed the l ong-term wet and dry pe riods in modeling for (a) facility planning and (b) operational planning? 2. Is there compelling evidence that the volume of inflows to Lake Okeechobee will be as much as double during a wetter regime as they were in the dry regime? 3. In the current modeling efforts, has the Dist rict adequately addressed the variability of inflows into Lake Okeechobee? 4. Does the modeling approach used by the Distri ct for both CERP and the Water Supply and Environment (WSE) schedule design meet requirements of standard engineering and design practices? 5. Are the steps being taken in the adaptive manage ment/modeling approach used by the District adequate to address the uncertainties in climate predictions and to assimilate new information? 6. Except for basic research approaches, are there other facility planning options that the District should consider to address the possibility of a c ontinued wetter regime of the climate cycle? 7. Are the data and models used by the District appropriate (reasonable and adequate) for their intended applications?
The above questions were the basis of questions posed to a group of five independent peer reviewers who assessed them using an June 2006 ve rsion of this paper. The paper and the peer review reports are available at the District web site ( www.sfwmd.gov ), under the Weather and Water Conditions, Long-Term Forecasts section.



### PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this document is to describe clim atic indicators that are likely to affect South Florida rainfall, the uncertainty associated with predicting the clim atic variability, and the data available for modeling long-term hydrologic conditions and changes in South Florida, and apply this information to address key questions listed in the previous section. Detailed analyses of the trends in the long-term datasets on rainfall and net inflows to Lake Okeechobee are also presented, along with comparisons to those used in regional modeling. The long-term datasets were analyzed to determine whether the mode ling dataset adequately represents climatic variability that is likely to occur during coming years. The use of clim ate outlooks based on known teleconnections for operati onal planning is also discussed. The document concludes with a set of recommendations for improving the curre nt approaches to addressing long-term climate variability in planning and operations. It is emphasized that this document focuses on long-term climate variability rather than climate change due to such causes as global warmin g. This focus reflects the recent emphasis on long-term climate shifts due to natural causes such as AMO and the lack of clear patterns and the considerable uncertainties concerning scientific understanding of climate changes that may be due to anthropogenic causes.

5

## II. RELEVANT CLIMATIC INDICATORS

Teleconnections are statistical correlations between persistent shifts of atmospheric variables occurring in widely separated parts of the world. These statistical correlations generally result from shifts in atmospheric and ocean circulations . Of numerous teleconnections that have been investigated by the District, three are recogni zed to have significant impact on the regional climatic variability in South Florida. They are (1) the El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO), (2) the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), and (3) the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). These climatic indicators seem to be related to total annual or seasonal rainfall and hydrologic conditions across the South Florida re gion and within particular basins (Figure 1)

.

Figure 1. Geographical locations of AMO, PDO, and ENSO teleconnections related to climate in South Florida. The map shows the correlation (red for positive and blue for negative) between global monthly sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies and the Florida Climate Division 4 monthly

precipitation. (Figure adapted from Mestas-Nunez and Enfield, 2003.)



### EL NIÑO/SOUTHERN OSCILLATION The ENSO is a slow oscillation in which the atmosphere and ocean in the tropical Pacific region interact to produce a slow, irregular variation between two extremes. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Diagnostics Center and other El Niño web pages confirm that ENSO is a major source of interannual climatic variability in South Florida. (See http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/ENSO/enso.description.html and http://www.elnino.noaa.gov/ .) ENSO variations are more commonly known as El Niño (the warm phase) and La Niña (the cool phase). Although ENSO is centered in the tropi cs, the changes associated with El Niño and La Niña events affect climate around the world. ENSO events tend to form between April and June and typically reach full strength in December. During El Niño events, South Florida tends to

6experience above-normal rainfall during the winter (dry season) months, whereas dry-season rainfall tends be below normal during La Niña

. District research indicates that ENSO and other climate indices have significant potential to predict net inflow volumes into Lake Okeechobee (Trimble et al., 1998b). ENSO events typically have a three- to seven-year period and their climatic effects are more pronounced during the winter months than during the wet-season summer months. In recent years, artificial neural network (ANN) models have been employed by th e District to help predict net inflow volumes into Lake Okeechobee using ENSO and other climatic indices (Zhang and Trimble, 1996; Trimble et al., 1998a,b; Trimble and Trimble, 1998 ). Using these techniques, scientists have gained a greater understanding of how ENSO and other factors aff ect South Florida weather and hydrology.



### ATLANTIC MULTIDECADAL OSCILLATION The AMO ( http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/amo_faq.php ) is a long-range climatic oscillation that causes periodic changes in the surface temp erature of the Atlantic Ocean, between the equator and Greenland, which may persist for several years or decades. AMO describes temperature deviations in the ocean surface that appear to be driving shifts (“warm” and “cool” phases) in South Florida’s climate (Enfield et al., 2001). There are significant year-to-year fluctuations in the instrumental records of ocean temperature ( Figure 2 ), but no clear indications of the exact years when AMO switches from a warm to cool phase. The transition between phases is generally determined by tracking a multi-year average ( Figure 2 ).

-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

YearTempeature Anomaly (deg Celsius) Monthly Temperature Anomaly 10-year moving average

Figure 2. Interannual variability of detrended, monthly sea surface temperature anomalies (degrees Celsius) and the AMO index. Derived from a 10-year moving average.

7During the twentieth century, the 1900–1925 period seems to have been dominated by a cool phase of the AMO, followed by a warm phase ( 1926–1969) and another cool phase (1970–1994). Since approximately 1995, the AMO index has been increasing. Although the exact years of warm and cool phases of AMO are difficult to identify and vary among researchers, the general conclusion drawn from the differing periods remain the same and is not critically important for ensuing discussions. Accordingly, the following four periods were used for this analysis: AMO1 (cool) 1895–1925 AMO2 (warm) 1926–1969 AMO3 (cool) 1970–1994 AMO4 (warm) 1995–2005 The magnitude and duration of the current warm phase cannot be predicted solely based on historical trends, although Enfield and Cid- Serrano (2006) recently made some probabilistic predictions of when the current warm period mi ght end. There is no overwhelming evidence to suggest that rainfall conditions during this warm phase will differ significantly from conditions experienced during the 1926–1969 warm phase. The duration and magnitude of the warm phase are major uncertainties that affect facility planning for such major programs as CERP.



### PACIFIC DECADAL OSCILLATION The PDO ( http://jisao.washington.edu/pdo/ ) is a pattern of Pacific climatic variability that somewhat resembles El Niño ( Figure 3 Panel A ). While the two climatic oscillations have similar spatial climate “fingerprints,” they have very different behavior in time. Two main characteristics distinguish PDO from ENSO: (1) P DO events during the twentieth century have persisted for 20 to 30 years, while typical ENSO events last for only a few years, and (2) the climatic fingerprints of the PDO are most visibl e in the North Pacific/North American sector, while secondary signatures exist in the tropics. The opposite effects occur for ENSO. Several independent studies find evidence for just two full PDO periods since the start of the twentieth century: PDO cool regimes prevailed fro m 1947 to 1976 and briefly during the latter half of 1999 through mid-2002, while warm regimes dominated from 1925 to 1946, from 1977 through 1998, and from late 2002 until the present. Several other shorter periods occurred within the longer ones, for example, the 1958–1961 warm phase and the 1988–1991 cool phase. Variations in South Florida rainfall data during the longer periods reflect these shorter episodes.

The PDO affects the South Florida climate much like El Niño except that the frequency of the oscillation is on decadal and multidecadal scales instead of the three to seven years of El Niño. Thus, during the warm phase of the PDO, South Florida tends to experience above-normal rainfall during the dry season ( Figure 3 Panel B ).

8A Monthly Values for the PDO index: 1900–November 2005.

B Correlation of November–April precipitation with November–April PDO 1948–2004.

Figure 3. (A) PDO computed as the leading principal component of the monthly

North Atlantic sea surface temperature anomalies. (B) Correlation map of U.S. precipitation to PDO shows that South Florida has a very high correlation between rainfall and PDO index during the dry-season months (November–April).

9

### AMO AND SOUTH FLORIDA’S CLIMATE The relationship between AMO cycles and rain fall patterns in South Florida is not well defined. Figure 4 shows the historical time series of Di strict-wide annual rainfall patterns and the forecast volumes of Lake Okeechobee Net Inflow (LONIN) plotted as a deviation from their overall statistical means. The variable LONI N is defined here as rainfall (RF) minus evapotranspiration (ET) plus inflows. It w as computed using the continuity equation as LONIN = DS + Outflows, where DS represents Delt a (change in) storage. Although no dramatic trends appear from these graphs, there are clearly periods of below- and above-normal rainfall and LONIN throughout the historical record. In particular, the wetter periods of 1940s, 1950s, and the years since 1995, can be identified fro m the rainfall pattern. These years generally correspond to the AMO warm phases. The LONI N shows similar patterns, and is further influenced by the nonlinear relationship between rainfall and runoff, the effect of antecedent conditions, and water management in the tributary basins of Lake Okeechobee. These influences will be discussed later in this paper. Another way to identify trends in long-term data records is to inspect cumulative deviations from the statistical mean ( Figure 5 ). The AMO1–AMO4 periods defined above correspond reasonably well with the increasing or decreasing trends of the cumulative deviations, which generally correspond to the below-normal or above -normal periods of the rainfall and/or LONIN time series, respectively.



### PREDICTABILITY OF AMO There is no known basis at present to estimate the exact duration, magnitude or return frequency of AMO phases. The short record of instrumental ocean temperature data show that the average length of the cycle is approximately 60 years, but individual cycles may vary considerably. As shown in Figure 6 , a 450-year history of the AMO index was recently reconstructed using tree data (Gray et al., 2004). The average length of a warm phase during this period was about 34 years, but individual phases ranged from as short as 11 years to as long as 60 years. Similarly, cool phases averaged 21 y ears in length and ranged from 6 to 61 years (Enfield and Cid-Serrano, 2006). It is clear from this data that the exact length, and for that matter the strength of a warm or cool episode of AMO, may be extremely difficult to predict, while it is not clear whether the current warm phase will last as long as the last one (approximately 1926–1969). Even during a warm phase of the AMO, multi-year droughts can occur in South Florida, associated with La Niña conditions or other phenomena. This was clearly demonstrated by occurrence of the most severe drought on record in 2000–2001, a year that was fully within the latest AMO warm phase. Multi-year drought periods occurred during each decade of the previous warm phase (1920s–1960s).

10Figure 4. District-wide long-term rainfall patterns (top panel) and the Lake Okeechobee Net Inflow (LONIN) values plo tted as deviations fr om the individual statistical means.

Figure 5. Cumulative deviation from the overall mean for district-wide rainfall and LONIN time series.

11A

B



### warm

Figure 6. (A) Reconstructed values of North Atlantic Sea Surface Temperature (SST) anomalies (computed as the deviation from the mean in units of

standard deviations, plotted as ba rs) using tree-ring technology and corresponding AMO index (10-year movi ng average plotted as a solid line). (B) Durations of significant warm (red) and cool (blue) AMO regimes identified from data in panel (A). (D ata from Gray et al., 2004).



### INTERACTING EFFECTS OF TELECONNECTIONS Climatic variability and change are the result of complex and nonlinear interactions among a number of determining forces. Therefore, a single indicator cannot typically be used to represent the entire coupled oceanic-atmospheric weather gene rating system. For example, if varying ocean phases drive atmospheric circulation, then the r esponse of the atmosphere may be delayed by a few years after an ocean phase indicator such as the AMO crosses a specific threshold. AMO sea surface temperatures may vary according to a sinusoidal wave pattern, while the atmospheric response follows a delayed-step function that is not immediately apparent when the AMO ocean index goes from negative to positive. For tropical weather and Florida hydrology, this seems to be the case. Similar delays also occur in the response of the atmosphere to El Niño events (Barnston et al., 1999). This delay in response to global-scale ch anges adds to the uncertainty in predictions. The complexity underlying climatic indicat ors necessitates caution before using such information to make short- or long-range wate r management decisions. Finally, seemingly minor changes in spatial and temporal patterns of rain fall distribution may produce dramatic changes in hydrologic variables such as runoff.

12Since there are at least three significant climatic indicators of importance for South Florida, it is important to understand and account for interac ting effects of these teleconnections. As a part of the District’s climate research program, Mestas-Nunez and Enfield (2003) made an exhaustive investigation of intra-seasonal to multidecadal vari ability in South Florida rainfall. From this analysis they concluded that the ENSO associ ation with South Florida precipitation varies depending on the different phases (warm and cool) of AMO and PDO. For example, Table 1 shows contingency tables of February–April rainfall and ENSO for AMO cool and warm phases, indicating how ENSO–rainfall relationships cha nge depending on the AMO phase. For example, there is a 35 percent chance that February–Apr il rainfall will be in the wetter tercile under El Niño conditions when AMO is in the cool phase. However, this increases to 81 percent when AMO is in the warm phase.

Table 1 . Contingency table of ENSO

– rainfall (February, March, and April [FMA]) relationship as a function of AMO.*

AMO Cool Phase AMO Warm Phase

ENSO Phase ENSO Phase Rainfall (FMA) La Niña Neutral El Niño Rainfall (FMA) La Ni ñ a Neutral El Ni ñ o

Wet 0% 19% 35% Wet 10% 35% 81%
Neutral 20% 50% 60% Neutral 25% 35% 6%

Dry 80% 31% 5% Dry 65% 10% 13%

* ENSO – El Niño-Southern Oscillation; AMO – Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation

Correlations between South Florida climate a nd AMO/PDO patterns (the teleconnections mentioned above) have been seen in recent decad es. For example, during the 1976–1995 period, the AMO was in the cool phase and the PDO was in the warm phase. This was a stressful time for the natural systems of south-central Florida, as the seasonality of rainfall tended to reverse the natural hydroperiod. That is, on average, wetter-than-normal dry seasons and drier-than-normal wet seasons occurred. Because evapotranspiration is much lower during the dry season, the 1976–1995 period brought frequent, very large dry-season surpluses of net rainfall. These surpluses led to large runoff volumes and rising water levels throughout the District. Other examples include the 1970–1975 period, in which both the AMO and PDO were in their dry phases, resulting in extended dry peri ods, and 1995–1998, in which both oscillations were in their wet phases, producing very wet periods.



### OTHER POTENTIAL INDICATORS The SFWMD also uses the climate outlook forecasts developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Prediction Center (CPC) to aid operational planning efforts. Data sources and tools used fo r CPC forecasts include statistical interpretations of current and historical global sea surface temperatures (including the data that drive PDO and AMO periods), precipitation, soil moisture, solar radiation and trends, ENSO events, and outputs from various climate models. The CPC provide s updated predictions of precipitation and temperature, including one-month and three-month outlooks.

13The SFWMD has also conducted research to improve understanding of the effects of drainage and development on temporal and spatial distribu tion of rainfall (Mattocks et al., 1999; Mattocks and Trimble, 2000; Pielke et al., 1999; Chen et al., 2001) and potential effects of global warming, including sea level rise, on water resource pla nning (Trimble et al., 1998a). Several recent publications summarize the SFWMD experience in applying climate outlook methods to address water management issues in South Florida (IRI, 2002; Trimble et al., 2006).



### DISTRICT EFFORTS TO UNDERSTAND TELECONNECTIONS
The District conducted numerous studies to unde rstand the effects of teleconnections on South Florida and determine how climate forecasts could best be applied to improve Lake Okeechobee operations (Trimble et al, 1998b,c; Tr imble and Trimble, 1998; Cadavid et al., 1999; Obeysekera et al., 2000). The work culminated in a landmark study describing the importance of the AMO to climatic variability (Enfield et al ., 2001). The SFWMD has also investigated the application of ANN and data mining tools to characterize and hindcast Lake Okeechobee net inflows (Zhang and Trimble, 1996a,b; Trimble et al., 1998b;c Trimble and Trimble, 1998). These hindcasts are provided as input data to test the operational rules of the SFWMM (Trimble et al., 1998b,c) both for current operations and infrastructur e and for performance of future alternatives. A number of experts in the field of climatology have peer reviewed the SFWMD climate outlook methodology (Hewett, et al., 2000; Kole n and Hewitt, 2000; Mestas-Nunez and Enfield, 2003). More recently, recognizing the importance of long-term climatic regimes, the USACE formally approved and implemented the SFW MD recommendation to use AMO and ENSO climatic indicators to predict seasonal and mu lti-seasonal outlooks for use in the operational planning of Lake Okeechobee.



## III. ROLE OF MODELS IN PLANNING AND OPERATION
Climatic indicators are used in the SFWMD planning process primarily through the application of regional models such as the S outh Florida Water Manage ment Model (SFWMM). These tools provide a basis to assess water supply and flood control requirements, help determine the design and operation of future water manage ment facilities, and de termine environmental resource needs and impacts. Models used in c onjunction with predictions of future climatic conditions are particularly important for pla nning, design and implementation of long-range activities such as CERP projects, which are expected to require many years to construct and have design life expectancies of 50 years or more. In the design and analysis of water resources plans and projects for CERP, computer models are used to analyze existing and si mulate possible future conditions ( Figure 7 ). Planning processes then analyze these conditions to determin e planning options that are likely to offer the greatest benefits or least impacts (Loucks, 1992). Models provide important information for planning, but such information is never complete . As a result, models cannot substitute for the judgment of experienced engineers, planners and managers (Loucks, 1992). Moreover, models are only one of a number of tools used to design project components. More specifically, a particular modeling scenario is assumed to be static with respect to facility plans, operating criteria, land use /land cover conditions, and water demands ( Figure 8 ). Consequently, this scenario is subject to a variety of hydrologic conditions as extracted from the most recent historical period of record, currently assumed to be 1965–2000. A regional-scale computer model (SFWMM) is used for evaluating the performance of the plan with respect to varying hydrologic conditions.

14

### Project Implementation Reports (PIRs) Alternative plans are evaluated to develop the project plan that will be recommended to Congress for

construction authorization.



## Design/ Construction

Project Operation Regional

Regional Modeling Modeling

Figure 7. Planning, design, and construction phases of CERP process indicating where regional mode ling plays a role.

Figure 8. Scenario depicting So uth Florida Water Management Model (SFWMM) generalized inputs and outputs. Plan: Assume “static” conditions:

- Land Use/Land Cover - Water Demands - O p eratin g Criteria Model Outp Daily time series o ut

f water levels, Model Outp



## • Daily time

series o f water levels,



### •

•

• Climatic Input Rainfall ET Climatic Input Rainfall ET Model Ou Daily time series o t

f water levels, Model Output Daily time step

series of water levels, flows



### •

•

• Climatic Input Rainfall ET Climatic Input Rainfall ET 

### SFWMM ( 2X2 )

Climatic Input Rainfall ET Climatic Input

Rainfall ET Boundary Conditions 1965–2000 period of record Performance Measures

15Analysis of project alternatives often relies on performance measures that represent project objectives in the form of quantitative criteria. Models allow quantification of hydrologic conditions (i.e., water levels and flows) th at can be presented as performance measures and provided, along with other critical information such as costs and physical constraints, to decision makers. The exact application of models in water r esources planning and mana gement depends on the project purposes. When modeling climatic variab ility and change, selection of an appropriate period of record is important. However, paramete rs that describe climatic variability (magnitude, duration, and return frequency) introduce uncerta inties into water resources planning efforts, and can result in over-design, cost overruns, and po or project performance. Adaptive management offers an accepted approach to dealing with uncertainties in water resources modeling and planning processes. The basic elements of adap tive management are summarized in Section IV. The South Florida Water Manage ment Model (SFWMM) shown in Figure 8 is a regional model developed by the SFWMD as a planning tool to help guide regional water supply and environmental restoration efforts for the District . A detailed description of this model can be found at the District web site ( www.sfwmd.gov ) under the S imulation Modeling, Hydrologic & Environmental Systems Modeling section. The model mathematically represents a physical system, and simulates the performance of the exis ting or proposed water management facilities and operations. Operating rules and input datasets can be modified to represent a range of planning and forecasting scenarios. The SFWMM is a continuous simulation model that is driven by historical hydrologic and meteorological data. Input datasets include da ily spatial rainfall and evapotranspiration data, as well as local basin runoff and irrigation estimates for the relevant basins. The spatial domain of the SFWMM south of Lake Okeechobee is divided into grid cells, each 2 miles square. The model generates a desc ription of hydrologic conditions throughout the region, which is then used to estimate effect s on water supply, flood protection, and natural systems. A typical application of a planning tool such as the SFWMM uses an available period of reliable historical input data that includes a wide range of both dry and wet years. For Lake Okeechobee and its tributaries, the SFWMM uses estimates of inflows based on historical flow data or estimates of inflows based on prescribed changes to upstream water management. The combined inflows to Lake Okeechobee from the tri butary basins may be referred to as net inflow. Studies by Trimble et al. (1998b,c) have show n a significant potential for using ENSO and other indices to predict net inflow volumes in to Lake Okeechobee for operational planning. Furthermore, use of ANN models has helped to bring a better understanding of these factors (Zhang and Trimble, 1996; Trimble et. al ., 1998b,c; Trimble and Trimble, 1998).



## IV. AMO TRENDS IN CLIMATE AND HYDROLOGIC DATA
Although the records at individual rain gauge locations vary in length, several long-term rainfall datasets have been cons tructed using such gauge records. These datasets typically begin in the year 1895. In addition, inflow records at key gauging locations of the Kissimmee Basin and a reconstructed time series of net inflow into La ke Okeechobee are also available. This exercise was intended to evaluate the long-term records to detect trends that may be associated with climate shifts, especially warm and cool phases of AMO.

16

### DATA Two sets of reconstructed monthly rainfall record s were used for this analysis: (a) the PRISM dataset (Daly et al, 2004), and (b) National Clima tic Data Center (NCDC) datasets for Climate divisions 4–7 in South Florida ( http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html ). This analysis used flow records for S-65 and S-65E gauge locations in the Kissimmee Basin as well as the LONIN dataset constructed using Lake water le vels and outflow records. Th e grid-based PRISM dataset was spatially averaged to represent regions that cover the major basins in South Florida. Details of the data are shown in Table 2

. 

### TRENDS IN WATER-YEAR DATA In this study, annualized values were based on a water year, defi ned as the period from June 1 to May 31. This date range differs slightly from the standard period used by the SFWMD (May 1–April 30). The June–May span was used in this study because May represents the end of the dry season; therefore, the June–May span he lped to minimize carryover of discharge data from one water year to the next.

Table 2. Monthly climatic data used for trend analysis.

Variable Region/Gauge Location Dataset Period of Record
Ukiss Upper Kissimmee Basin PRISM 1895–2005 Lkiss Lower Kissimmee Basin PRISM 1895–2005 KissRF Entire Kissimmee Ba sin PRISM 1895–2005 BigCyp Big Cypress Basin PRISM 1895–2005
EAA Everglades Agricultura l Area PRISM 1895–2005 Everglades Everglades National Park PRISM 1895–2005
LOK Lake Okeechobee PRISM 1895–2005
WCA3 Water Conservation Area 3 PRISM 1895–2005
WCA12 Water Conservation Areas 1 and 2 PRISM 1895–2005
WestAG Western Agricultural Areas PRISM 1895–2005 Caloos Caloosahatchee Basin PRISM 1895–2005
SWCoast South West Coast PRISM 1895–2005 Browrd Broward County PRISM 1895–2005 Dade Miami-Dade County PRISM 1895–2005
MartSLC Martin, St. Lucie Counties PRISM 1895–2005 Pbeach Palm Beach County PRISM 1895–2005 Div4rf South-central Florida NCDC 1895–2005 Div5rf Everglades and Southwest Coast NCDC 1895–2005 Div6rf Lower East Coast NCDC 1895–2005Rainfall

Div7rf Florida Keys NCDC 1895–2005
S-65E S-65E gauge location SFWMD 1928–2005 S-65 S-65 gauge location SFWMD 1933–2005Flow

LONIN Lake Okeechobee net inflow SFWMD 1914–2005 Note: All variables represent rainfall except S- 65, S65-E, and LONIN, which represent flows.

17Box plots of the water year data for variables for the four AMO periods ( Figure 9) show a shift in distribution of both rainfall and flow between cool periods (A MO1 and AMO3) and warm periods (AMO2 and AMO4). Moreover, rainfall and flow amounts during the warm periods appear to shift upward compared to the cool pe riods. However, comparing of the means of all four periods using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows that not all of the shifts are significant. As shown in Table 3 , shifts in rainfall for the Ukiss, KissRF, BigCyp, EAA, Everglades, LOK, WCA3, WestAG, and MartSCL basins are significant at the 5 percent level. Both S-65E and LONIN also show shifts in mean at the 5 percent level. Although rainfall data for NCDC Divisions 4–7 show visual shifts in the box plots, they are not significant at the 5 percent level. (The hypothesis testing is formulated in such a way that the percent chance of indicating a difference in means when in reality th ey are not is limited to 5 percent.) Overall, results show statistically significan t shifts in mean values during different AMO periods for both rainfall and flow variables. Actu al changes in the means and percent values are shown in Table 4

.

Figure 9. Box plots of water year (June–May) rainfall and flow variables for four AMO periods (1895–2005). Whiskers of the box plots were eliminated to show the actual distribution of points outside the in terquartile range as indicated by each box. The line inside the box is the median value.

18Figure 9. Continued.

19Table 3. Probability value, p, for the null hypothesis that samples of different AMO periods were drawn from populations with the same mean. Also shown are the variables for which p-value exceeds the 5 percent significance level.

Variable ANOVA p-value Significant at 5% level Variable ANOVA p-value Significant at 5% level Ukiss 0.027 Yes Browrd 0.149 No
Lkiss 0.056 No Dade 0.12 No
KissRF 0.028 Yes MartSLC 0.038 Yes BigCyp 0.003 Yes Pbeach 0.186 No
EAA 0.038 Yes Div4rf 0.104 No Everglades 0.019 Yes Div5rf 0.163 No
LOK 0.058 Yes Div6rf 0.278
WCA3 0.012 YesRainfall

Div7rf 0.672 No
No

WCA12 0.067 No S-65E 0.014 Yes
WestAG 0.031 Yes S-65 0.08 No
Caloos 0.137 NoFlow

LONIN 0.026 YesRainfall

SWCoast 0.117 No



### TRENDS IN RAINFALL-RUNOFF RELATIONSHIPS
As shown in Table 4, the annual rainfall reduction in the last transition from an AMO warm period (AMO2) to an AMO cool period (AMO3) ranges from 2 to 9 percent. However, the percent reduction in the flow variables is much larger; the LONIN was the highest, at about 48 percent. Although increases in percent reducti ons in runoff are typically due to decreased rainfall, all of the following factors may contribute to this large reduction in the flow variables (S-65E, S-65, and LONIN), such as:

• Changes in rainfall between AMO periods

• Land use changes in the Kissimmee Basin

• Post-channelization water manage ment in the Kissimmee Basin

• Non-homogeneity in long-term da ta used for trend analysis

With regard to the non-homogeneity, it is diffi cult to pinpoint inconsistency in the data, particularly from the 1920s and 1930s. In par ticular, the calculation of LONIN is based on changes in Lake stages and outflow variables. While it is challenging to determine whether decades-old measurements have inherent inaccuracies, review of rainfall-runoff relationships might provide useful for this analysis.

20Table 4. Sample means for different AMO period s and percent change relative to other AMO periods.

Mean Percent Change

Area Unit AMO1 AMO2 AMO3 AMO4 AMO2 to AMO3 AMO3 to AMO4 AMO2 to AMO4 Ukiss in. 46.89 50.93 48.61 54.48 -4.6 12.1 7.0 Lkiss in. 45.59 49.14 47.66 52.49 -3.0 10.1 6.8 KissRF in. 46.50 50.4 48.32 53.89 -4.1 11.5 6.9 BigCyp in. 52.27 56.54 52.00 60.82 -8.0 17.0 7.6
EAA in. 49.04 53.19 51.13 55.70 -3.9 8.9 4.7 Everglades in. 51.96 56.00 51.67 59.38 -7.7 14.9 6.0
LOK in. 46.44 50.11 48.39 52.58 -3.4 8.7 4.9
WCA3 in. 55.94 59.21 54.20 63.33 -8.5 16.8 7.0
WCA12 in. 55.86 59.07 56.28 63.32 -4.7 12.5 7.2
WestAG in. 49.31 52.90 50.40 56.38 -4.7 11.9 6.6 Caloos in. 48.58 51.12 49.94 54.91 -2.3 10.0 7.4
SWCoast in. 49.72 51.99 50.72 56.99 -2.4 12.4 9.6 Browrd in. 57.47 59.93 57.27 64.49 -4.4 12.6 7.6 Dade in. 57.38 59.9 55.22 62.66 -7.8 13.5 4.6
MartSLC in. 48.07 51.62 51.58 56.19 -0.1 8.9 8.9 Pbeach in. 55.06 58.82 56.81 60.58 -3.4 6.6 3.0 Div4rf in. 50.33 53.00 50.19 56.06 -5.3 11.7 5.8 Div5rf in. 51.09 52.81 50.41 56.07 -4.5 11.2 6.2 Div6rf in. 58.21 59.87 57.75 64.69 -3.5 12.0Rainfall

Div7rf in. 43.02 42.56 40.79 44.38 -4.2 8.8 8.1
4.3
S-65E ac-ft 1,399,271 890,342 1,386,436 -36.4 55.7 -0.9 S-65 ac-ft 699,608 592,058 1,007,097 -15.4 70.1 44.0Flow

LONIN ac-ft 319 1,966 1,031 1,619 -47.6 57.1 -17.6
Note: All variables represent water year (June–May) rainfall except S-65, S-65E, and LONIN, which represent annual flow volumes.

21In Figure 10, the rainfall-runoff relationship (S-65E flow versus KissRF) for the Kissimmee Basin is presented. In this plot, the runoff volum e (water year basis) at S-65E is expressed as a depth of water over the basin, by using a total ar ea of 1,595 square miles for the upper basin plus 684 square miles for the lower basin. Based on the availability of flow data, only the scatter plots for AMO2, AMO3, and AMO4 periods are shown. Except for a group of “outliers” that are identified on the plot, it is difficult see a defi nite change between AMO cycles from this plot. Many of the outlier years correspond to well know n times when South Florida experienced very wet periods due to tropical events. These years al so occurred before the modern system of water control structures and improved canals was constructed in the Kissimmee Basin.
As is seen from the runoff coefficients (runoff as a fraction of rainfall) shown in Figure 11
, the percentage of runoff due to rainfall was high (above 35 percent) during these seven outlier years. A further investigation of outlier years has shown that the wet-season rainfall, particularly the months of June and September, were much wetter during these years than normal ( Figure 12 ). Under more natural basin conditions such as those that were present during the last AMO warm cycle (AMO2), such wet periods could result in long periods of wetter conditions in the basin with high runoff in the ensuing m onths. Occasional wetter-than-normal wet seasons, which could occur during an AMO warm cycle, ma y be responsible for large increases in runoff into Lake Okeechobee. The role of tropical stor ms and/or hurricanes as possible causes of the very wet antecedent conditions during wet sea sons in these outlier years needs further investigation. Monthly distributions of S-65 flow for the AMO2 and AMO3 periods are shown in Figure 13 . The first box plot each month represents the wetter AMO2 period, while the second plot represents the drier AMO3 period. Clear ly, there is a big difference between the monthly flow distributions. As seen from the box plots, during early dry-season months (September–December), the flow data at th ese key gauges in the Kissimmee Basin show a substantial reduction. This cha nge is attributed to the regulation of the upper basin, which occurred during the 1963–1969 period, coincident ally around the same time (1960s) that the AMO appeared to switch from warm to cool. Th e change in flow regime, from a hydrograph characterized by slow recession to that of a manage d flow regime typified by flow spikes, can be seen clearly in the daily flow hydrograph at S-65 ( Figure 14 ). Consequently, the attribution of the drastic change in LONIN solely due to AMO ch ange may not be warranted, particularly on a seasonal basis.



### TRENDS IN MONTHLY DATA To identify possible changes in seasonal pa tterns, monthly values of both rainfall and flow variables were analyzed. Figures 15 and 16 present the mean monthly distributions of District-wide rainfall and LONIN for the four different AMO periods. A careful evaluation of the mean rainfall pattern indicates an apparent shift in the mean in June, with a more significant shift in September. Flow values also appear to show a similar shift in August through October. Once again, as discussed above, the flow values ar e impacted by causes other than the AMO. Differences in the monthly means of AMO2 and AMO3 periods were tested using a standard t-test. Table 5 shows the p-value associated with the t-sta tistic. In the table, values in bold type indicate instances where the p-value is less than the 5 percent significance level. In those instances, the null hypothesis th at the means are the same between AMO2 and AMO3 may be rejected. Table 6 shows the results of the Kolmogorov- Smirnov test, which was conducted to compare the empirical distributions of the AMO2 and AMO3 periods for each month. Again, bold type indicates instances where the null hypothesis that two distributions are identical may be rejected.

22Figure 10. Rainfall-runoff relationship between S-65E and Kissimmee Basin rainfall (KissRF). Arrows indicate “out lier” years, which have unusually high discharge values.

Figure 11. Runoff coefficient versus ra infall for the Kissimmee Basin.

23Figure 12. Monthly distribution of rainfall during the seven outlier years (34-35,48- 49, 30-31, 47-48, 53-54, 60-61, and 59-60) . Also plotted is the mean monthly rainfall (solid line) for the AMO2 period.

Figure 13. Mean monthly patterns of flows out of Lake Kissimmee at S-65 for AMO2 and AMO3 periods.

24

### Post-Channelization

Figure 14. Daily flow hydrograph at S-65 indicating a change from natural recessions to flow spikes as a result of Upper Kissimmee Chain of Lakes regulation during the post-cha nnelization period.

Figure 15. Mean monthly District-wide rainfall for different AMO periods.

25Figure 16. Mean monthly LOK net inflow volumes for different AMO periods.

Table 5. p-value for the t-statistic used for comparing means of AMO2 and AMO3. Values in bold type indicate variables for that month that have significant differences in mean at 5 percent level.

Variable Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Ukiss 0.35 0.94 0.94 0.07 0.33 0. 29 0.42 0.63 0.13 0.34 0.18 0.72 Lkiss 0.26 0.72 0.63 0.04 0.91 0.88 0.73 0.98 0.07 0.11 0.07 0.33 KissRF 0.31 0.96 0.94 0.05 0.46 0.41 0.49 0.73 0.09 0.23 0.14 0.60 BigCyp 0.50 0.50 0.60 0.50 0.21 0.42 0.19 0.70 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.10 EAA 0.07 0.71 0.47 0.28 0.45 0.22 0.61 0.59 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.53 Everglades 0.63 0.39 0.79 0.75 0.57 0.42 0.07 0.32 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.10 LOK 0.13 0.76 0.41 0.05 0.87 0.45 0.58 0.88 0.06 0.07 0.02 0.40 WCA3 0.61 0.31 0.61 0.60 0.65 0.32 0.17 0.95 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.21 WCA12 0.25 0.32 0.29 0.61 0.51 0.34 0.54 0.67 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.78 WestAG 0.20 0.68 0.41 0.29 0.62 0.40 0.34 0.97 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.32 Caloos 0.15 0.86 0.29 0.07 0.82 0.65 0.44 0.52 0.08 0.11 0.02 0.41 SWCoast 0.29 0.83 0.32 0.11 0.61 0.92 0.68 0.31 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.34 Browrd 0.50 0.29 0.22 0. 84 0.60 0.51 0.37 0.97 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.90 Dade 0.84 0.25 0.95 0.83 0.92 0.33 0.05 0.27 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.18 MartSLC 0.11 0.33 0.44 0. 12 0.22 0.60 0.59 0.83 0.20 0.01 0.01 0.23 Pbeach 0.10 0.57 0.33 0.60 0.24 0.33 0.72 0.25 0.15 0.00 0.01 0.53 Div4rf 0.40 0.96 0.91 0.02 0.34 0.39 0.13 0.71 0.12 0.14 0.11 0.50 Div5rf 0.16 0.86 0.42 0.08 0.83 0.36 0.14 0.60 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.43 Div6rf 0.39 0.39 0.54 0.69 0.53 0.51 0.69 0.56 0.14 0.00 0.01Rainfall

Div7rf 0.28 0.46 0.57 0.72 0.20 0.70 0.15 0.34 0.11 0.00 0.38 0.55 0.63
S-65E 0.19 0.76 0.75 0.96 0.35 0.05 0.33 0.52 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 S-65 0.84 0.09 0.67 0.13 0.28 0.00 0.14 0.94 0.02 0.00 0.00Flow

LONIN 0.62 0.62 0.39 0.72 0.04 0.09 0.42 0.53 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.02

26Table 6. p-values for the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for comparing distributions of AMO2 and AMO3. Values indicate variable s for that month that have significant differences in distributi on at 5 percent level.

Variable Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Ukiss 0.49 0.82 0.71 0.18 0.63 0.61 0.77 0.89 0.17 0.78 0.35 0.97 Lkiss 0.38 0.60 0.85 0.12 1.00 0.53 0.87 0.44 0.19 0.45 0.32 0.59 KissRF 0.25 0.75 0.78 0.18 0.97 0.59 0.60 0.48 0.27 0.78 0.27 0.93 BigCyp 0.39 0.34 0.96 0.80 0.65 0.79 0.06 0.81 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.49
EAA 0.13 0.29 0.45 0.12 0.57 0.15 0.76 0.67 0.24 0.05 0.01 0.59 Everglades 0.49 0.48 0.90 0.92 0.98 0.85 0.03 0.77 0.03 0.00 0.20 0.41
LOK 0.12 0.71 0.83 0.12 0.89 0.45 0.48 0.78 0.19 0.05 0.07 0.62
WCA3 0.52 0.32 0.69 0.81 1.00 0.85 0.01 0.92 0.04 0.00 0.13 0.25
WCA12 0.32 0.32 0.84 0.43 0.82 0.40 0.53 0.64 0.13 0.01 0.04 0.45
WestAG 0.15 0.52 0.32 0.25 0.98 0.35 0.38 0.99 0.16 0.11 0.02 0.84 Caloos 0.33 0.67 0.13 0.39 0.98 0.55 0.83 0.67 0.34 0.36 0.16 0.69
SWCoast 0.53 0.75 0.64 0.34 0.55 0.93 0.63 0.10 0.08 0.46 0.55 0.54 Browrd 0.80 0.63 0.61 0.57 0.68 0.52 0.41 0.67 0.60 0.02 0.06 0.45 Dade 0.83 0.44 0.88 0.89 0.76 0.74 0.01 0.77 0.13 0.00 0.22 0.57
MartSLC 0.11 0.18 0.91 0.22 0.27 0.71 0.99 0.97 0.27 0.03 0.06 0.41 Pbeach 0.15 0.55 0.75 0.18 0.38 0.59 0.27 0.09 0.27 0.01 0.02 0.48 Div4rf 0.45 0.75 0.56 0.12 0.84 0.59 0.35 0.55 0.37 0.25 0.20 0.99 Div5rf 0.15 0.55 0.75 0.22 0.94 0.32 0.09 0.52 0.04 0.12 0.09 0.74 Div6rf 0.69 0.92 0.79 0.77 0.45 0.71 0.38 0.96 0.54 0.00 0.03Rainfall

Div7rf 0.77 0.67 0.65 0.43 0.22 0.47 0.06 0.44 0.32 0.00 0.67 0.72 0.94
S-65E 0.02 0.23 0.30 0.35 0.34 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
S-65 0.00 0.02 0.16 0.22 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00Flow

LONIN 0.27 0.83 0.94 0.45 0.07 0.29 0.39 0.61 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00

27

### COMPARISON OF THE SFWMM MODELING PERIOD WITH THE PERIOD OF RECORD Modeling an existing period of record allows continuous simulation that represents system responses on a daily basis to a wide variety of weather patterns actually experienced in South Florida. In addition, the 36-year period of reco rd includes a wide range of extreme wet and dry events. The system’s response to these extreme even ts has been documented and can be related to an expected frequency of occurrence or return period. The period includes a sample of the most likely weather-related impacts to the syst em and some very rare, extreme events. The likelihood of experiencing a weather pattern beyond the range represented in this period of record is very low.
Table 7 compares the SFWMM modeling period with the AMO phases in the entire period of record. About one-third of the 36 years within the SFWMM dataset represents AMO positive (warm phase) years and the remaining two-thirds represent AMO neutral or negative (cool phase) years. Efforts are ongoing to update the model data through 2005. This will provide 41-year simulations that include at least 15 years from the AMO warm phase. The variability and range of extremes in the datasets that drive the model ar e much more important than the AMO phase for a given year.

Table 7. Comparison of AMO periods with the SFWMM period of simulation.

AMO Period Name AMO Phase Selected year Range within the period of record Number of Years Number of years in current SFWMM modeling period

(1965–2000)

AMO1 cool 1895–1925 31 Not used
AMO2 warm 1926–1969 44 5
AMO3 cool 1970–1994 25 25
AMO4 warm 1995–2005 11 6

The current SFWMM input rainfall dataset cove rs the geographic region south of Lake Okeechobee. The dataset uses hundreds of rain ga uges to define the 36-year (1965–2000) daily time series for each of the model’s 4-square-mile grid cells. The dataset and SFWMM model simulations have not been extended to include years before 1965 because of the relatively low density of rain gauges prior to that year, lack of other hydrologic and ma nagement data for the system, and the fact that many of the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control (C&SF) Project facilities were not constructed then. For this document, PRISM rainfall data were compared to ascertain how well the 36-year “sample” represents the 111-year “population” The 36-year sample is the 1965–2000 period currently simulated by the SFWMM; and the pop ulation is taken as the entire 1895–2005 period of the PRISM dataset. Annual and wet-seas on rainfall for the entire SFWMD region was evaluated. Figure 17 Panel A shows the annual PRISM rainfall data (May–April water year) series for the SFWMD region as departures from the mean. In the figure, values are ranked from highest to lowest and the 36 years used in the current SFWMM are highlighted. Figure 17 Panel B is formatted similarly but uses wet-season (May–October) rainfall data. These figures show many wet years in the 36-year dataset, and the distribution is representative of the range that occurred during the entire 111-year period. In fact, several of the 36 years in the dataset were considerably wetter than were the years 2002–2005.

28Figure 17. (A) Distribution of annual rainfall for the SFWMD (May–April water years, 1895–2005). (B) Distribution of wet-season rainfall (May–October, 1895–2005). A

B

29

### LAKE OKEECHOBEE NET INFLOW An important aspect of determining potential effects of increased rainfall on water management decisions is the relationship betw een rainfall rates and the resulting amount of surface water flow. This is an issue of special concern in the Lake Okeechobee watershed. In recent years, excessive rainfall has produced both su stained high water levels in the Lake and consequential large releases of excess water to tide. CERP projects have been proposed and initially designed to provide additional capacity throughout the regional system to capture and store more of this “excess” water. This added cap acity will help to lower Lake levels and reduce discharges of water to tide. The concern has been raised that the climatic conditions used to design CERP and other projects may not represent a sufficiently wide range of Lake runoff conditions. Therefore, an initial an alysis was conducted to determine whether the period of record used for SFWMM simulations represented a broad- enough range, relative to historical conditions, to provide a technically sound basis for future planning efforts. Figure 18 illustrates the distribution of historical net inflow to Lake Okeechobee available from 1914 through 2005. The solid bars represent th e 36-year span used in the current SFWMM simulation period (1965–2000), and th e striped bars represent the recent, relatively wet five years (2001–2005).

Figure 18. Distribution of annual net inflow to Lake Okeechobee, water years 1913–2005 (May–April), wh ere NI = RF – ET + inflows.

30These data indicate that the four wettest years used in the 1965–2000 simulation period all have larger net inflow than any of the r ecent very wet, AMO warm-phase years (2001–2005). Furthermore, the smallest net inflow year ( 2000), occurred during the current AMO warm phase. This helps to confirm that the SFWMM distributio n represents a range of net inflow conditions sufficiently broad to evaluate the performance of proposed structural and operational plans. Questions have been raised as to whether the dataset used for the SFWMM adequately represents conditions likely to occur during the current AMO warm period. Because it is unclear how long such a warm period may last, it is importa nt to include both cool and warm period data in the modeling period. The period of simulation for the SFWMM is 36 years long, from 1965 to 2000. Plans are under way to extend this period through 2005. If one applies the same criteria that were used to define the AMO phases (AMO 1–AMO4), then the current SFWMM simulation period includes 11 years of warm-period data, which represents about one-third of the entire period. A statistical analysis was performed to comp are the 1965–2000 period to the previous 36-year period (1929–1964). Both the t-test for mean and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for distributions were conducted to characterize si gnificant differences betw een the two periods. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 7 and Table 8

. In the case of rainfall variables, the SFWMM 36-year simulation period was not significantly different from the previous AMO warm period. An exception may have occurred during the month of April, when many of variables i ndicated differences between the two AMO periods. Flows at S-65 and S-65E show significant differe nces during most of the wet season and in the early dry-season month of November. This differe nce may be partly due to regulation of the Kissimmee Basin. However, such a change due to management is not relevant for the issue of 2x2 modeling since the current modeling approach already accounts for hydrologic changes due to regulation of the Kissimmee Basin lakes and Kissimmee River.

31Table 7. p-values for t-statistic for comparison of means of rainfall and flow values between the 2x2 simulation period (1965

– 2000) and the preceding period (1929–1964). Values in bold type indicate variables for that month that have significant differences in mean at 5 percent level.

Variable Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Ukiss 0.29 0.74 0.61 0.01 0.71 0.76 0.55 0.87 0.11 0.52 0.39 0.41 Lkiss 0.25 0.66 0.87 0.01 0.43 0.60 0.48 0.69 0.10 0.45 0.18 0.43 KissRF 0.26 0.71 0.74 0.01 0.62 0.95 0.52 0.81 0.09 0.48 0.31 0.40 BigCyp 0.20 0.41 0.98 0.28 0.26 0.30 0.26 0.72 0.02 0.37 0.16 0.23
EAA 0.07 0.27 0.67 0.10 0.88 0.74 0.96 0.70 0.10 0.29 0.19 0.86 Everglades 0.28 0.41 0.99 0.33 0.66 0.18 0.06 0.36 0.06 0.25 0.30 0.27
LOK 0.15 0.57 0.66 0.01 0.66 0.75 0.61 0.87 0.09 0.46 0.12 0.56
WCA3 0.14 0.19 0.72 0.24 0.69 0.27 0.15 0.61 0.06 0.36 0.18 0.45
WCA12 0.06 0.10 0.36 0.15 0.67 0.22 0.95 0.82 0.16 0.41 0.23 0.62
WestAG 0.12 0.36 0.71 0.14 0.40 0.43 0.66 0.93 0.03 0.54 0.08 0.44 Caloos 0.14 0.75 0.60 0.03 0.50 0.53 0.82 0.16 0.07 0.68 0.08 0.45
SWCoast 0.25 0.85 0.71 0.08 0.38 0.42 0.88 0.04 0.05 0.61 0.16 0.36 Browrd 0.12 0.10 0.24 0.25 0.70 0.12 0.74 0.50 0.29 0.51 0.23 0.48 Dade 0.27 0.28 0.97 0.26 0.90 0.18 0.02 0.26 0.26 0.17 0.32 0.43
MartSLC 0.08 0.20 0.48 0.03 0.86 0.59 0.32 0.69 0.14 0.13 0.07 0.72 Pbeach 0.05 0.21 0.54 0.12 0.60 0.37 0.91 0.59 0.19 0.17 0.08 0.81 Div4rf 0.32 0.98 0.68 0.00 0.98 0.88 0.26 0.94 0.06 0.43 0.24 0.45 Div5rf 0.17 0.62 0.71 0.04 0.95 0.76 0.27 0.61 0.03 0.61 0.14 0.69 Div6rf 0.18 0.18 0.60 0.21 0.69 0.14 0.93 0.32 0.26 0.18 0.10Rainfall

Div7rf 0.20 0.92 0.37 0.42 0.31 0.05 0.10 0.51 0.41 0.35 1.00 0.80 0.99
S-65E 0.24 0.93 0.70 0.85 0.19 0.04 0.25 0.77 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 S-65 0.79 0.20 0.23 0.08 0.41 0.00 0.16 0.56 0.08 0.00 0.00Flow

LONIN 0.74 0.57 0.34 0.21 0.01 0.19 0.77 0.91 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.03

32Table 8. p-value for the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for comparing rainfall and flow distributions of 2x2 simulation period (1965–2000) an d the previous 36-year period (1929

– 1964). Values in bold type indicate variables for that month that have significant differences in mean at 5 percent level.

Variable Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Ukiss 0.46 0.46 0.30 0.01 0.66 0.85 0.97 0.30 0.30 0.46 0.30 0.85 Lkiss 0.46 0.66 0.85 0.10 0.66 0.85 0.85 0.66 0.18 0.66 0.66 0.85 KissRF 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.06 0.66 0.85 0.97 0.46 0.46 0.85 0.18 0.85 BigCyp 0.18 0.18 0.85 0.66 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.85 0.10 0.30 0.46 0.85
EAA 0.18 0.10 0.46 0.03 0.85 0.66 0.85 0.97 0.30 0.18 0.10 0.66 Everglades 0.10 0.46 0.97 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.01 0.85 0.30 0.18 0.85 0.66
LOK 0.10 0.46 1.00 0.10 0.30 0.85 0.66 0.97 0.18 0.46 0.46 0.66
WCA3 0.10 0.10 0.85 0.46 0.85 0.66 0.03 0.85 0.18 0.10 0.46 0.85
WCA12 0.10 0.10 0.85 0.10 0.85 0.66 0.85 0.85 0.66 0.46 0.66 0.66
WestAG 0.10 0.18 0.66 0.18 0.66 0.46 0.97 0.66 0.18 0.46 0.18 0.66 Caloos 0.30 0.46 0.46 0.30 0.66 0.97 0.97 0.18 0.18 0.85 0.66 0.85
SWCoast 0.30 0.85 0.85 0.30 0.46 0.66 0.85 0.01 0.18 0.85 0.85 0.66 Browrd 0.18 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.66 0.30 0.85 0.46 0.66 0.30 0.66 0.97 Dade 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 1.00 0.46 0.01 0.85 0.85 0.18 0.66 0.97
MartSLC 0.03 0.18 0.66 0.06 0.66 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.30 0.18 0.66 0.66 Pbeach 0.10 0.18 0.97 0.10 0.97 0.46 0.66 0.46 0.46 0.30 0.18 1.00 Div4rf 0.66 0.46 0.30 0.01 0.85 0.97 0.66 0.85 0.10 0.46 0.18 0.97 Div5rf 0.30 0.18 0.85 0.18 0.85 0.97 0.30 0.97 0.10 0.46 0.66 0.46 Div6rf 0.10 0.46 0.85 0.18 0.46 0.30 0.46 0.85 0.46 0.18 0.46Rainfall

Div7rf 0.46 0.85 0.85 0.18 0.66 0.46 0.06 0.66 0.46 0.18 0.97 1.00 0.97
S-65E 0.01 0.18 0.06 0.46 0.46 0.03 0.01 0.18 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 S-65 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00Flow

LONIN 0.03 0.85 0.85 0.18 0.10 0.46 0.46 0.85 0.03 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.00

33

## V. USE OF CLIMATE OUTLOOK IN OPERATIONS
Lake Okeechobee Regulation Schedule Development
Seasonal and multi-seasonal climate outlooks have also been incorporated into the federal operational rules for Lake Okeechobee. Traditional rule curves (or regulation schedules) for reservoir operations are “static” in the sense that operational decisions are made only when the reservoir stage crosses a predetermined curve. In 1998, the SFWMD de veloped a “dynamic” regulation schedule for Lake Okeechobee known as Water Supply and Environment (WSE) that incorporates not only the seasonal and multi-seaso nal climate outlooks, but also the near-term (two-week) forecasts of tributary inflows into the Lake. The schedule, adopted by the USACE in July 2000, consists of (a) a set of regulation sche dule lines that define different operational zones; and (b) decision trees that support the process for making discharges based on forecasts of inflows and climate outlook. The climate-based operational guidelines as incorporated into the WSE regulation schedule have emerged as a hi ghly desirable approach for Lake Okeechobee water management. Diagrams representing the two parts of the WSE schedule are presented in Figure 19

. The decision to hold water in the Lake or make releases to tide is primarily determined by Lake water levels, the time of year, and cond itions in other parts of the regional systems ( Figure 19 Panel A ). These water levels were established primarily based on historical data and experience with Lake operations over the past several decades. Meteorological conditions, including forecasts and long-term trends, are considered in the operational decision tree ( Figure 19 Panel B ) to determine whether dischar ges to tide are necessary. WSE was the first regulation schedule in South Florida that formally and explicitly utilized seasonal and multi-seasonal climate outlooks as guidance for regulatory release decisions. The WSE schedule has been modified recently to u se the AMO and ENSO states in estimating the Lake Okeechobee Net Inflow Outlook (LONINO) for the future 6 to 12 months. Adoption of a decision tree with climate outlook as a component of the WSE schedule was a unique feature in the operation of Lake Okeechobee, and was a majo r shift from the traditional rule curves that are used to operate large reservoirs elsewhere in the country and the world. During WSE development, the SFWMD conducted a performance test using available Lake net inflow data beginning in 1914. The results of that effort were presented at public meetings prior to the adoption of WSE. Although the 1914–1964 period appeared to be somewhat wetter than the 1965–2000 period documented in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the WSE schedule still outperformed other regulation schedul es considered at that time. This evaluation was based on the analyses of the type shown in Figure 20 , which consider effects on water supply, flood protection, and environmental systems. Overall operational strategy was simulated to im prove conditions with respect to five major competing water management objectives ( Figure 20 ). This improvement was estimated for the climatological regime during the 1965–1995 period by five performance measures: (1) a decrease by 3 percent in the undesirable Lake Okeechobee water level events for the Lake littoral zone, (2) an increase by approximately 4 percent of the Lake Okeechobee Service Area water supply needs being met during drought years, (3) improved hydropattern for the Everglades, (4) a decrease in the number of times undesirable high discharge criteria were exceeded for the estuaries, and (5) lower Lake water levels during the peak of the hurricane season.

34A

B

Figure 19. (A) Water level criteria used to identify different lake management zones and potential needs for water releases based on wa ter supply, flood control, and environmental considerations. (B) Operational decision tree used to help determine timing and volume of water releases based on water levels, estimated inflows, and climate forecasts.

35Figure 20. Multi-objective tradeoff analysis showing improvement with climate-based operation of Lake Okeechobee.
When the regulation schedule was evaluated, it was unclear whether the apparent trend to a drier hydrologic condition was due to changes in regional-scale precipitation patterns associated with drainage and development in South Florid a (Chen et al., 2001; Mattocks and Trimble, 2000; Mattocks et al., 1999; Pielke et al., 1999), natural climatic variability (Enfield et al., 2001; Zhang and Trimble, 1996a,b; Trimble et al., 1998b,c; Trimble and Trimble, 1998), long-term global climate change, or rainfall–runoff relationships altered by infrastructure changes. As data were much sparser before 1965, it was not clear whet her wetter periods such as the 1940s and 1950s would re-occur or whether South Florida’s declining rainfall trend would continue. During the 1970s and 1980s, the remnant Everglades experienced prolonged undesirable dry conditions. From an ecological perspective, it see med highly desirable for any new Lake schedule to route regulatory discharges southward to the Everglades at lower Lake water levels for the benefit of the littoral zone, the Everglades, a nd the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie estuaries. WSE was designed to achieve these goals. To acc ount for a possible return to persistent, much wetter conditions, WSE was designed to allow regulat ory releases to tidewater at stages that were almost 2 feet lower than the previous schedule allowed.

36The SFWMD and USACE have further modified the WSE schedule to incorporate the potential presence of a wetter climatic regime that appears to have begun in the mid-1990s. In 2003, after four years of WSE operation, the WSE decision trees were adjusted to improve performance during wet periods. The re-evaluation le d to adjustments of several WSE parameters including the LONINO (USACE, December 2004). The USACE secured several other minor temporary deviations (2004, 2005, and 2006) to the Water Control Plan to allow releases in pulses up to Level 1, if necessary, under conditions that the WSE decision tree called for no releases. These temporary deviations are identified in the plan as tools that can be used as adaptive manage ment strategies to address unusual conditions. Completion of the 1999 C&SF Project Comprehensive Review Study (Restudy) led to the development of CERP (USACE and SFWMD , 1999). When CERP planning began in the mid-1990s, there was little published information on relationships between global climate states and South Florida rainfall. As CERP planning co ntinued through the late 1990s and predictive relationships were developed, it was suggested that climate ou tlook information should be used to help guide the design and operation of some CERP components. Those components included the regional Lake Okeechobee Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR), the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) Storage Area, and the Lake Okeechobee Regulation Schedule study.



### POSITION ANALYSIS Seasonal and multi-seasonal operati onal planning of major water resources systems requires a careful evaluation of likely future scenarios of water and environmental c onditions that influence management objectives. It is common practice to use computer simulation models to determine likely outcomes of both short- and long-term management options. The SFWMD uses position analysis as a form of risk analysis that can fo recast uncertainties associated with a specific operating plan for a basin over a period of many months conditioned on the current state (e.g., reservoir storages) of the system (Hirsh, 1978; Smith et al., 1992; Tasker and Dunne, 1997; Cadavid et al., 1999). The District relies on gene rating a large number of possible traces with durations of one or more seasons for the hydrologi c variable of interest (e.g., reservoir stages or flows), using the same initial conditions and broa d ranges of meteorological conditions that may occur in the future but cannot be forecast accura tely. Future likely meteorological conditions may be derived using such methods as extended stream flow prediction (Day, 1985), historical data, and stochastic simulation models (Tasker and Dunne, 1997). Ideally, to include effects of long-term climate cycles such as AMO and PDO, the dataset should span 100 years or more. The 36-year dataset that is generally available for the South Florida system allows consideration of only s horter-term phenomena, such as ENSO and sunspot cycles, that have return frequencies of 10 years or fewer. Cadavid et al. (1999) defined the terms C onditional Position Analysis (CPA) and the Unconditional Position Analysis (UPA) depending on whether or not the estimated risks incorporate climate outlook (e.g., La Niña conditions that affect the likely inflows to the reservoir system). The objective of the CPA is to estimate the risks of the future response of the system given both the current state and the future climate forecast. The methodology adopted for CPA (Cadavid et al., 1999) follows a procedure descri bed by Croley (1996). Croley’s method includes an optimization procedure that provides a set of weights for different traces, and these weights reflect information provided by the climate fore casts. For example, if an El Niño condition is predicted and larger reservoir inflows are possi ble during this condition, the traces that are associated with El Niño years would have larger weights. During the past decade, position analysis concepts developed by the District have been used with increasing effectiveness to assess risks associated with seasonal and multi-seasonal

37operations of the water management system a nd communicate the projected outlook to decision makers, agency partners, stakeholders, and th e public. While the District has used position analysis chiefly to project the expected stage of Lake Okeechobee, it has also used the technique for other impoundments, including the WCAs. Monthly position analysis has become an important tool for making operational decisions th at may have implications for multiple seasons.



## VI. INCORPORATION OF CLIMATIC VARIABILITY IN WATER RESOURCES PLANNING
Incorporating uncertain climatic tendencies into a long-range planning process calls for careful analysis to allow balance among risks, cost s, and benefits. It may be expensive to provide areas for open storage for flood control, for exam ple, based on an expectation that the next several decades will be wetter. Construction and operation of such storage facilities may also cause significant long-term environmental impacts. Plans must also consider the possibility that droughts may occur during an overall wetter climatic regime and, therefore, include provisions for long-term carryover water storage capacity. Figure 18 , which shows the distribution of annual net inflow to Lake Okeechobee for the period from 1913 to 2005, provides a general indica tion of relative inflows to the major regional storage facilities planned in CERP, and can be used as a basis to estimate how cost effectively the proposed CERP projects may address hydrometeorological extremes. This figure indicates that during the 1913–2005 period of record, there are only five years (roughly 5 percent of this period) when the volumes of inflow had the potential to exceed the inflow extrem es reflected in the 1965–2000 period of record that was used in CERP planning studies. These five years experienced extreme inflows, which exceeded the highest flows of the 1965–2000 period, and ranged from approximately 5.0 to 5.9 million acre-feet (ac-ft). These values were up to 20 percent greater than the maximum inflow of 4.9 million ac-ft that occurred during 1969 within the 1965–2000 planning period. As previously noted, these extreme flows occurred before major water control facilities were completed in the Upper Kissimmee Basin and Kissimmee River floodplain. These facilities provide improved capabilit y to control water levels and flows, and could have allowed wate r managers to better regulate the ra te of inflow to Lake Okeechobee, providing more time for redistribution, evapor ation, and infiltration of excess surface water. Recent cost estimates for the three largest reservoirs contemplated in CERP total approximately $1 billion. For discussion purposes, assuming that capturing this additional peak inflow would require a linear increase in reservoi r capacity and construction costs, then it would cost approximately $200 million more to accomm odate an additional in flow that could be reasonably expected to occur once every 20 years (USACE and SFWMD, 1999). Facilities proposed in CERP typically have a design life span between 50 and 75 years. Therefore, such extreme inflow conditions may occur only two to th ree times over the life of the project. In this example, regional facility planni ng should balance the cost ($200 million) for this protection from two or three extreme inflow events against potential damages or losses. The planning and design process could involve engineers and water managers in a public process, with input from concerned citizens and stakeholders, to determin e whether the increased capacity would be cost effective over the life cycle of the project.

38There are many ways that water resources planni ng for future changes to the system may account for uncertainties caused by natural climatic variab ility such as those attributed to AMO. The methods that are being used by the District are:
1. Sensitivity analysis of planning simulations
2. Continual expansion of the simulation peri od to include more AMO warm-phase years
3. Adaptive management in facility planning and implementation



### SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Several efforts have been undertak en to investigate the implications of climate shifts in South Florida. This section explains a sensitivity analysis that was conducted to ascertain the impacts of climate shifts. The District used the SFWMM in 1996 to simulate system performance for precipitation values that were 10 percent higher and lower than the base values. Results are shown in Figure 21 . A 10 percent shift in average rainfall (i.e., ± 5 inches) is considered as an extreme change. The average rainfall District -wide is approximately 52.1 inches. The District-wide mean increases during the AMO warm phase by 1.8 inches to about 53.9 inches and decreases during the cool phase by 1.5 inches to 50.6 inches. The change of ±10 percent, therefore, represents a shift approximately three times greater than can be expected to occur due to temperature cycle effects.

Figure 21. Results of SFWMM model simulation to estimate lake stage in Lake

Okeechobee using actual precipitation data for the period from 1965 to 1995 (CB2.7), precipitation data increased by 10 percent (RF_M10), and precipitation decreased by 10 percent (RF_P10).

39In this simulation, the base alternative ( CB2.7) included the 1990 land uses. A second alternative (RF_M10) was based on the same period of simulation with the rainfall decreased by 10 percent, whereas the third alternative (RF_ P10) had rainfall increased by 10 percent. This study substantiated the importan ce of including climate forecasts and climate shift indicators in future model development. As a result, subsequent model development integrated climatic variability as a key parameter and sensitivity analys es as a standard of performance. While this study shows the system responses to large changes in rainfall in the tributary basin, it may not be practical or feasible to plan for such changes th at have large uncertainties. A similar sensitivity analysis has been conducted to investigat e implications of potential sea level rise.



### CONTINUAL EXPANSION OF SI MULATION PERIOD OF SFWMM The choice of a period of simulation in any hydrologic model requires careful analysis of temporal and spatial density of data for rainfall, evapotranspiration, and required discharges at the boundaries of the model. Sparseness in the data , both temporally and spatially, can introduce unrealistic trends in long-term modeling results. Therefore, modelers typically evaluate the modeling objectives with respect to data availa bility to determine reasonable beginning and end dates for historical information. During the early 1980s, the SFWMM model developers originally chose to use an input dataset from the 1969–1982 period to simulate alternative structur al and operational changes to the system, because the period represented the mo st accurate and complete combination of hydrological, meteorological, and physical system information available at the time. The model datasets for the Lower East Coast Regional Wa ter Supply Plan during the early 1990s were increased to allow simulations for rainfall year s 1965–1990. Before the start of Everglades Restudy modeling in the mid-1990s, the 1991–1995 pe riod was added. Further evaluations of the WSE schedule and CERP have used the current 36-year simulation period (1965–2000). Lack of sufficient spatial coverage of rain gauges and weather stations makes it impractical expand the range of years used in simulations to earlier years (prior to 1965). However, District modelers are continually inves tigating methods that allow simulations to include more years during both drier and wetter periods. Becau se proposed infrastructure changes will be implemented over decades, the District will be ab le to evaluate future system changes with datasets that include more wet years, if the current AMO warm phase and above-normal rainfall conditions continue.



### ROLE OF ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT IN PLAN IMPLEMENTATION The SFWMD uses an adaptive management approa ch to incorporate new information about climate and hydrologic conditions in South Florid a into regional modeling for facility planning and operations. Information obtained from scientific research and monitoring is evaluated by District scientists and managers, and used as a ba sis to modify or adjust operational policies and procedures and potentially to redesign projects and facilities. Water managers use adaptive principles as a means to test or experiment with new concepts and effectively “learn by doing.” The planning and implementation of projects a ssociated with CERP over a period of decades makes adaptive management an effective means for incorporating climatic variability. To apply adaptive management effectively, sy stem responses must be continually monitored and management actions adjusted to ensure that the desired outcomes are achieved. Application of adaptive management principles is especially appropriate, and often required, in situations where there is a substantial amount of uncertainty regarding how management activities affect hydrologic conditions.

40Effective adaptive management involves a seque nced approach to information types and analysis procedures, including:

• Develop hypotheses about ecosystem structure and function, and re lationships between particular management goals and acti ons and anticipated system responses.

• Identify information needed to test h ypotheses and assess overall system responses.

• Conduct field operations or tests to manipul ate/control/or modify water management system features.

• Perform effective monitoring and evaluation of hydrologic and system responses in response to natural or induced changes.

• Conduct research necessary to investig ate/define/redefine hypotheses.

• Implement a process to systematically modify plans features or operations based on monitoring data and measured outcomes.
Modeling, an important tool used by the SFWMD throughout the adaptive management process, provides a means to rapidly and relativ ely inexpensively develop, test, and screen hypotheses that can help identify modifications or design features most likely to produce the desired results, and determine which aspects are b est tested in field-scale experiments, which features of the system may be most important to monitor, and what are the likely effects of proposed changes on system components or operations . In the case of climatic variability, models can be used to simulate alternative future rain fall conditions of higher rainfall or to effectively extend the period of hydrologic simulations backwa rd in time to include additional years in an AMO warm phase. Adaptive management is a cornerstone of CERP, whose implementation will span decades. Projects designed and constructed under CERP are required to incorporate adaptive management considerations within their operating rules. The CERP project designs and their actual operation are evaluated as a composite on a five-year cycle, to test the assumptions that were originally used in their development and determine whet her changing conditions or improved knowledge identify the need for change. Climatic indicators, trends, and global warming issues will play a key role in these overall system reviews. Modeling is central to CERP adaptive management, as shown in Figure 22 . System-wide performance measures are defined by scientists participating in the restoration process and expressed in quantitative hydrologic terms. These performance measures are provided to the modelers and translated into a form that can be generated by output files from the regional computer models. Performance measures may be further refined based on results of research or monitoring studies. The regional models are used to simulate the effects of various CERP projects and alternative scenarios. The consequent model results, expressed in terms of the hydrologic performance measures, are then evaluated by Everglades scientists. The final step is an overall assessment through the RECOVER process to dete rmine whether the goals of CERP are being achieved by the completed projects. This assessment may result in suggested changes to the projects themselves, to the monitoring program, a nd/or to the models and performance measures.

41Figure 22. Geographical locations of AMO, PDO, and ENSO teleconnections related to schemat ic diagram of CERP adaptive management, indicating the central ro le of modeling in this process.



## V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The choice of climatic conditions used for planning and operati ons of complex water resources systems involving multiple objectives is an important consideration for success of future projects. Climate change and variability due to natural and anth ropogenic causes are not fully understood and their prediction carries considerable uncertainties. Climate change and variability, which always have been of interest to the SFWMD, have become increasingly important during the last two decades. Applied research conducted and supported by the SFWMD has been published in peer-reviewed literature and has been widely recognized by other researchers, agencies, and institutions. Results from these studies have been selectively incorporated into SFWMD water resource mode ling, planning, and operational programs. ENSO, AMO, and PDO are large-scale climatic indicators that have implications for water resources and planning in South Florida. Of these three indicators, ENSO, which follows a three- to seven-year cycle, has the strongest effect on South Florida climatic conditions, and has received the most study. The PDO may last for decades and affects South Florida weather in a manner similar to ENSO, but with much less infl uence. The AMO has weaker effects than ENSO, but the cycles could span several decades. Th e AMO warm phase is associated with slightly higher, but more variable, rainfall conditions in South Florida.

42Research on AMO and PDO influences indicates a significant variability in the periodicity, duration, and magnitude of these multidecadal climatic indicators and their effects on South Florida weather. Furthermore, the relationships between these indicators and regional weather patterns or rainfall conditions in South Florid a cannot be accurately predicted. Hydrologic variation not only changes the amount of rainfall but also the spatial and temporal distribution. The SFWMD has incorporated consideration of climate trends into its modeling and operations decision-making processes. Notable examples include application of the WSE schedule and position analysis techniques to guide th e regulation of water releases into and out of Lake Okeechobee. The SFWMD is also proceeding cautiously to address long-term climate changes in its planning processes through an adap tive management approach, collecting new data and periodically reviewing project designs and operations based on new information. The SFWMD uses complex regional models effectively as tools to aid in water resources planning and management in conj unction with standard engineerin g practices. Its regional model, the SFWMM, incorporates a period of the South Florida hydrologic record (1965–2000) that includes a broad range of wet and dry years. This period of record is shown to include years with both excess and deficient rainfall that are compar able in magnitude and duration to extreme conditions that occurred prior to 1965. Although it would be desirable to expand the hydrologic basis of the SFWMM to include more years fro m the AMO warm phase, especially during the period from 1927 to 1964, there is a lack of hydr ologic data and operati onal parameters for the water management system before 1965. The SFWMD will continue to expand the modeling period forward to include the current AMO wa rm period as new data become available. By periodically extending the simulation period, the SFWMD can continually incorporate recent climate trends and re-evaluate proposed in frastructure changes, including CERP projects, that will be designed and constr ucted over a period of several decades. This adaptive approach follows standard engineering and operational pl anning practices and provides a means to reduce the risks of facility implementation when climate changes are inherently uncertain. The SFWMD has also effectively incorporated th e potential effects of future climate shifts and variability into operations of the regional water management system. The use of climate outlooks as a consideration for regulation of wate r levels in Lake Okeec hobee is an example of this effort. Moreover, the SFWMD continuously re-evaluates the implementation of this WSE regulation schedule to include adjustments that acc ount for changes in climatic indicators such as ENSO and AMO. The SFWMD continues to rely on timely information about climate patterns and change for planning, design, and operations to meet its missi on to manage and protect water resources of the region by balancing and improvi ng water quality, flood control, natural systems, and water supply.

43

## VI. RECOMMENDATIONS
Specific recommendations using long-term climate forecasts in District planning and operations, not necessarily in order of importance, are as follows:

1. Continue to incorporate new climatologic da ta into its modeling efforts to reflect developing trends in climate change. 2. Investigate alternative methods that can be used to extend the modeling period backward to incorporate climatic c onditions that existed before 1965. 3. Further refine the analysis of rainfall rela tionships to the volume of runoff into Lake Okeechobee, especially to examine specific antecedent conditions that occurred prior to large inflow events during the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s, and the relative roles of tropical storms/hurricanes and water management practices. 4. Review the adaptive management approach to ensure that climatic variability is adequately addressed in CERP implementation. Careful monitoring and evaluation during their design, construction, and operational phases, in conjunction with information derived from continued hydr ologic monitoring and improved climate change predictions methods, will be used to refine and modify these projects as necessary to address changing conditions. 5. Explore the use of synthetically generated ra infall data that account for climate shifts due to accepted teleconnections such as AMO and ENSO. 6. Continue the SWFMD climate research program to investigate further the utility of global climate teleconnections for impr oving the management of existing and proposed water resources facilities. Results of this applied research should be included, as appropriate, in the development of operating plans.

44

## VII. REFERENCES

Barnston, A.G., M.H. Glantz and Y. He. 1999. Predictive Skill of Statistical and Dynamical Climate Models in SST Forecasts During the 1997-1998 El Niño Episode and the 1998 La Niña Onset. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80(2):217-243.
Cadavid L.G., R. Van Zee, C. White, P. Trimbl e and J. Obeysekera. 1999. Operational Hydrology in South Florida Using Climate Forecasts. American Geophysical Union, 19 th Annual Hydrology Days. Colorado State University, August 16-20, 1999. ed. H.J. Morel Seytoux. Hydrology Days Pub., Atherton, CA.
Chen, S.B., B. Albrecht, J. Tenerelli, J. Gottschalk and P.J. Trimble. 2001. Studies of Atmospheric Forcing Over South Florida Using a High Resolution Numerical Model and Radar. 2001 Florida Bay Conference. Croley T.E. 1996. Using NOAA's New Climate Outlook in Operational Hydrology. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering . ASCE, 1(3): 93-102. Daly, C., Gibson, W.P., M. Doggett, J. Smith a nd G. Taylor. 2004. Up-to-Date Monthly Climate Maps for the Conterminous United States. Pr oc., 14th AMS Conf. on Applied Climatology, 84 th AMS Annual Meeting Combined Preprints, Amer. Meteorological Soc. Seattle, WA. January 13-16. Paper P5.1, CD-ROM. Day, G.N. 1985. Extended Streamflow Forecasting Using NWSRFS. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. ASCE, 111(2): 157-170. Enfield, D.B. and L. Cid-Serrano, 2006. Proj ecting the Risk of Future Climate Shifts. International Journal of Climatology 26(7): 885-895. Enfield, D.B., A. Mestas Nunez, and P.J. Trimble. 2001. The AMO and Its Relationship to Rainfall and River Flow in the Continental U.S. Geophysical Research Letter , vol. 28, May. Gray W.M., J.D. Sheaffer and C.W. Landea. 1997. Climate Trends Associated with Multidecadal Variability of Atlantic Hurricane Activity: Hu rricanes, Climate and So cioeconomic Impacts. Edited by H.F. Diaz and R.S. Pulwarty. Springer, Berlin. 15-53. Hanson, K. and G.A. Maul, 1991. Florida Scientist , 54(3/4):160-168. Gray, S.T., L.J. Graumlich, J.L. Betancourt and G.D. Pederson. 2004. A Tree-Ring Based Reconstruction of the Atlantic Multid ecadal Oscillation Since 1567 A.D. Geophysical Research Letters , 31:L12205, doi:10.1029/2004GL019932.
Hewett, R., J. Leuchner and P.J. Trimble

. 2000. Discovering Hydrologic Forecasting Rules for Water Management: A Preliminary Result. Proceedings of the 5 th International Conference on Computer Science and Informatics. IRI. 2002. Final Report on the Workshop on Appl icable Methods for Use of Seasonal Climate Forecasts in Water Management. November 6-8, Palisades, New York. Kolen, J. and R. Hewett. 2000. Prediction of Lake Inflows with Neural Networks. Proceedings of IEEE Systems, Man, Cybernetics. Tennessee. Loucks, D.P. 1992. Water Resource Syst ems Models: Their Role in Planning. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management . 118 (3): 214-223.

45Mattocks, C.A. and P.J. Trimble. 2000. Simulation of the Anthropogenic Impacts to the Regional Climatic Patterns of Central and Southern Florida. Speech at the Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration (GEER) Science Confer ence. December 11-15, 2000, Naples, FL. Mattocks, C.A., P.J. Trimble, M. Hinton, B. Trimble and M. Pietrucha. 1999. Simulation of Anthropogenic Generated Microclimates over the Florida Peninsula and their Impact on Florida Bay Water Cycle. Florida Bay and Adjacent Marine Systems Conference. Mestas-Nunez, A.M. and Enfield, D.B., 2003. I nvestigation of Intra-seasonal to Multi-decadal Variability in South Florida Rainfall. Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (83 pp). Online at http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/docs/Mestas_Enfield_FR_2003.pdf
, October 24, 2006. Obeysekera J., P. Trimble, L. Cadavid and C. White. 2000. Use of Climate Outlook for Water Management in South Florida, U.S.A. Proceedings of the Engineering Jubilee Conference. University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, June. Pielke Sr., R.A., R.L. Walko, L.T. Steyaert, P.L. Vidale, G.E. Liston, W.A. Lyons and T.N. Chase. 1999. The Influence of Anthropogeni c Landscape Changes on Weather in South Florida. Monthly Weather Review , 127 (7): 1663–1673. SFWMD. 1996. Climate Change and Variability: How Should the District Respond. Draft Report. South Florida Water Management Dist rict, Planning Department with Information Systems and Operations Divisions. West Palm Beach, FL. 11 pages and appendix. Online at http://www.sfwmd.gov/org/pld/hsm/pubs/ptrimble/solar/clim1.pdf , October 24, 2006. Shih, G. 1983. Data Analysis to Detect Ra infall Changes in South Florida. Technical Memorandum #DRE-165, South Florida Water Mana gement District, West Palm Beach, FL. Smith, J.A., G.N. Day and M.D. Kane. 1992. Non-Parametric Framework for Long-Range Streamflow Forecasting. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management . ASCE, 118(1): 82-92. Tasker, G.D. and P. Dunne. 1997. Bootstrap Position Analysis for Forecasting Low Flow Frequency. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management . ASCE, November/December. Trimble, P. 1997. Workshop on Climate Variability and Water Resource Management in Southeastern United States. Vanderbilt Univers ity. Nashville, TN, June 25-27 (74 pp). Online at http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/regional/jun97wkshp.pdf , August 31, 2006. Trimble, P.J. and B.M. Trimble. 1998. Recognition and Predictability of Climate Variability within South-Central Florida. 23rd Annual Climate Diagnostic and Prediction workshop, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science. University of Miami, Florida, October 26-30. Online at http://www.sfwmd.gov/org/pld/hsm/pubs/ptr imble/solar/workshop/cpc_paper.htm , October 24, 2006.

46Trimble, P.J., E.R. Santee and C.J. Neidrauer. 1998a. Preliminary Estimate of Impacts of Sea-Level Rise on Regional Water Resources of Southeastern Florida. Proceedings of the International Coastal Symposium, Journal of Coastal Research. Special Issue, No. 26
Trimble, P.J., E.R. Santee and C.J. Neid rauer. 1998b. Special Report. A Refined Approach to Lake Okeechobee Water Mana gement: An Application of Climate Forecasts. South Florida Wa ter Management District (73 pp). Online at http://www.sfwmd.gov/org/pld/hsm/pubs/ptrimble/solar/report/report.pdf , October 24, 2006.
Trimble, P.J., E.R. Santee and C.J. Neidraue r. 1998c. Including the Effects of Solar Activity for More Efficient Water Management: An Application of Neural Networks. Second International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Solar-Terrestrial Physics. Sweden, July. Online at http://www.sfwmd.gov/org/pld/hsm/pubs/ptrimble/solar/final_dec3.pdf , October 24, 2006. Trimble, P.J., T.B. Obeysekera, L.G. Cadavid and E.R. Santee. 2000. Seasonal to Multidecadal Climate Variability and the Contribution to South Florida Hydrology. Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration Conference. December 12-15. Trimble, P.J., T.B. Obeysekera, L.G. Cadavid and E.R. Santee. 2006. Applications of Climate Outlooks for Water Management in South Florida. In Climate Variations, Climate Change, and Water Resources Engineering . Edited by Jurgen D. Garbrecht and Thomas C. Piechota.ASCE/EWRI. Reston, VA. USACE and SFWMD. 1999. The Central and Southern Florida Flood Control Project Comprehensive Review Study Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic Impact Statement (PEIS). South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL. Online at http://www.evergladesplan.org/pub/restudy_eis.cfm#mainreport , October 26, 2006. Willet, H.C. 1953. Atmospheric and Ocean Circ ulations as Factors in Glacial-Interglacial Changes of Climate. In Climate Change . Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA, 51-71. Zhang, E. and P.J. Trimble. 1996a. Predicting Effects of Climate Fluctuations for Water Management by Applying Neural Networks. World Resource Review , 8(3) (17 pp). Online at http://www.sfwmd.gov/org/pld/hsm/pubs/p trimble/prediction/prediction.htm , October 24, 2006. Zhang, E. and P.J. Trimble. 1996b. Fore casting Water Availab ility by Applying Neural Networks with Global and So lar Indices. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual American Geophysi cal Union. April. Online at http://www.sfwmd.gov/org/pld/hsm/pubs/ptrimble/forecast/forecast.htm , October 24, 2006. Zhang, R. and T.L. Delworth. 2005. Impact of Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillations on India/Sahel Rainfall and Atlantic Hurricanes. Nature . November.

47