alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Dental Partners, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Gregory A. Serrao, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Breht T. Feigh,
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gregory A. Serrao                                                          
|Gregory A. Serrao, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer             
|March 16, 2011                                                                 
|                                                                               
|/s/ Breht T. Feigh                                                             
|Breht T. Feigh, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|March 16, 2011
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 30095

IN RE: DEEPWATER HORIZON

— APPEALS OF THE ECONOMIC AND PROPERTY DAMAGE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

Before DAVIS, GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

. W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: The petition for panel rehearing is denied. The majority of the panel notes its complete agreement with the reasoning set forth in Judge Southwick’s order on petition for panel rehearing in In re Deepwater Horizon , No. 13

- 30315. Judge Garza dissents from the denial of panel rehearing for the reasons stated in his panel dissent of January 10, 2014, In re Deepwater Horizon , 739 F.3d 790, 821

- 29 (5 th Cir. 2014) (Garza, J., dissenting), and the dissent from the court’s denial of rehea ring en banc.
DENIED. Case: 13-30095 Document: 00512635469 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2014
#### In the Matter of Kathleen Lynch Powell, an Attorney.

[52 NYS3d 690]

Per Curiam.

Kathleen Lynch Powell was admitted to practice by this Court in 1984 and lists a business address in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with the Office of Court Administration. Powell has applied to this Court, by affidavit sworn to November 8, 2016, for leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons *(see*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter *1616AGC) opposes the application upon the ground that Powell has failed to adequately provide required information in her resignation affidavit *(see*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] part 1240, appendix E).

In reply to AGC’s opposition, however, Powell has submitted a supplemental affidavit, sworn to May 9, 2017, in which she corrects the deficiencies identified by AGC. Accordingly, with AGC voicing no other substantive objection to her application, and having determined that Powell is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons *(see*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a] [2]), we grant the application and accept her resignation.

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that Kathleen Lynch Powell’s application for permission to resign is granted and her nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further ordered that Kathleen Lynch Powell’s name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court *(see generally*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]); and it is further ordered that, effective immediately, Kathleen Lynch Powell is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Powell is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further ordered that Kathleen Lynch Powell shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to her.
Exhibit 32.1

                         THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY
                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                SECTION 906
                                  OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The
Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  November 12, 2004

                                         /S/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                        Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                        President and
                                        Chairman of the Board
No. 10-64.

#### Skoshi Thedford Farr, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 892, 131 S. Ct. 274,

178 L. Ed. 2d 140,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6331.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 591 F.3d 1322.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14352]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-43-000]


Nautilus Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 26, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 21, 1998, Nautilus Pipeline Company, L.L.C. 
(Nautilus) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, Revised Title Sheet and Tariff Sheet Nos. 117, 250, 261, 
272, 284, 327, 339, and 346 proposed to become effective June 20, 1998.
    Nautilus states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect an 
address and telephone change for the corporate office of Nautilus.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14352 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Com. v. Brown

12/07/2015

198 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1141
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15402]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

Space Planning for the National Archives and Records 
Administration; Public Meetings

    The National Archives and Records Administration announces the 
following meetings:

--Thursday, June 11, 1998, from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the National 
Archives and Records Administration, Northeast Region (Pittsfield), 10 
Conte Drive, Pittsfield, MA 01201-8230. For further information call 
781-647-8745 or e-mail [email protected].
--Tuesday, June 16, 1998, from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the National 
Archives and Records Administration, Pacific Region (San Francisco), 
1000 Commodore Drive, San Bruno, California 94066-2350. For further 
information call 650-876-9249 or e-mail [email protected].
--Wednesday, June 17, 1998, from 10 a.m. to noon and 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. 
at the National Archives and Records Administration, Pacific Alaska 
Region (Seattle) 6125 Sand Point Way, NE, Seattle, WA 98115-7999. For 
further information call 206-526-6501 or e-mail 
[email protected].
--Tuesday, June 23, 1998, from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Norman P. Murray 
Community and Senior Center, 24932 Veterans Way, Mission Viejo, CA 
92692. For further information call 949-360-2618 or e-mail 
[email protected].
--Wednesday, June 24, 1998, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. at the National 
Archives and Records Administration, Great Lakes Region (Chicago), 7358 
South Pulaski Road, Chicago, IL 60629-5898. For further information 
call 773-581-7816 or e-mail [email protected].
--Tuesday, June 30, 1998, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. at the National 
Archives and Records Administration, Rocky Mountain Region, Denver 
Federal Center, Building 48, Denver, CO 80225. For further information 
call 303-236-0801 or e-mail [email protected].

    This is a series of meetings at which NARA is seeking public input 
for a study of its space needs for the next 10 years. NARA 
representatives will explain the reasons for undertaking a space plan, 
its objectives, and the planning process, and will invite comments and 
answer questions. In addition to helping NARA with its planning, this 
meeting is part of a National Performance Review initiative called 
Conversations With America: My Government Listens. NARA urges everyone 
interested to attend.
    Reservations are not required. The meetings will be open to the 
public.

    Dated: June 3, 1998.
John W. Carlin,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 98-15402 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
```
# DLA Distribution Anniston highlights Champion of the Month

/ Published March 29, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
In a recent newsletter shared with employees, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Anniston, Alabama, recognized Justin B. Rollins as one of the Champions of the Month.

Rollins distinguished himself during the first quarter of 2022 as part of the Inventory Action Team at DDAA, as a lead supply technician supporting DLA’s mission to maintain accountability of all stock items in service.

As a lead supply technician, Rollins realizes the importance of accurate counts during the performance of his duties, which has allowed item managers to freely requisition and store stock with no fear of denials, loss or unaccountability of material at DDAA.

Rollins’ performance this quarter has played a major role in the denial rate for the fiscal year to date of .04%, which guarantees stock is readily available to fill high-priority requisitions, preventing any work stoppages during critical times for the warfighter. Rollins conducted numerous high-dollar variance counts during this quarter and is recognized for his presence of mind during many counts where he applied additional efforts and research.

His actions were key in maintaining production and accountability of all material stowed and maintained at DDAA.
No. 09-11219.

#### Tyrone Parker, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 868, 131 S. Ct. 162,

178 L. Ed. 2d 96,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6467.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 1243.
#### People v White

2d Dept: 144 AD3d 881

denied*
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-336701 on Form S-4 and Registration Statements No. 33-358205 and 33-358209
on Form S-8 of Complete Business Solutions, Inc. of our report dated February
9, 1998 on the financial statements of c.w. Costello & Associates, inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1997 not presented separately herein, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Complete Business Solutions, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1999.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
March 23, 2000
<PAGE>   2
                       REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors and Shareholders
c.w. Costello & Associates, inc.
Wethersfield, Connecticut

We have audited the statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows of c.w. Costello & Associates, inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997
not presented separately herein. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in
all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of c.w. Costello
& Associates, inc. (an "S" Corporation) for the year ended December 31, 1997, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
February 9, 1998
No. 09-10070.

#### Felton L. Matthews, Jr., Petitioner v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

562 U.S. 822, 131 S. Ct. 381,

178 L. Ed. 2d 16,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6576.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
#### Duane II., Matter of (Andrew II.)

3d Dept: 151 AD3d 1129 (Proceeding No. 1)

denied
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.7


                              POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned hereby appoints Robert T. Slezak as his agent and
attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form
10-K relating to the year ending September 25, 1998, and any amendments
thereto, required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
Ameritrade Holding Corporation.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the 18th day of December, 1998.





/s/ Joseph A. Konen
-------------------
Joseph A. Konen, Director
No. 09-10690.

#### Dillard J. Booker, Petitioner v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 849, 131 S. Ct. 98,

178 L. Ed. 2d 62,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6453,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 528.
2016-1665.

#### Gordon v. Erie Islands Resort & Marina.

Ottawa App. No. OT-15-035, 2016-Ohio-7107.

O’Donnell, J., dissents and would accept the cause on proposition of law No. I.

Kennedy, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mediacom Capital Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rocco B. Commisso, Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|January 9, 2004 | By: | /s/ ROCCO B. COMMISSO                     
|--------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                |     |                                           
|                |     | Rocco B. Commisso  Chief Executive Officer
|                |     |                                           
|                | By: | /s/ MARK E. STEPHAN                       
|                |     |                                           
|                |     | Mark E. Stephan  Chief Financial Officer
Presidential Documents

31885

Federal Register

Vol. 63, No. 111

Wednesday, June 10, 1998

Title 3—

The President

Memorandum of June 1, 1998

Plain Language in Government Writing

Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies

The Vice President and I have made reinventing the Federal Government

a top priority of my Administration. We are determined to make the Government more responsive, accessible, and understandable in its communications

with the public.

The Federal Government’s writing must be in plain language. By using

plain language, we send a clear message about what the Government is

doing, what it requires, and what services it offers. Plain language saves

the Government and the private sector time, effort, and money.

Plain language requirements vary from one document to another, depending

on the intended audience. Plain language documents have logical organization, easy-to-read design features, and use:

• common, everyday words, except for necessary technical terms;

• ‘‘you’’ and other pronouns;

• the active voice; and

• short sentences.

To ensure the use of plain language, I direct you to do the following:

• By October 1, 1998, use plain language in all new documents, other than

regulations, that explain how to obtain a benefit or service or how to

comply with a requirement you administer or enforce. For example,

these documents may include letters, forms, notices, and instructions.

By January 1, 2002, all such documents created prior to October 1, 1998,

must also be in plain language.

• By January 1, 1999, use plain language in all proposed and final rulemaking documents published in the Federal Register, unless you proposed the rule before that date. You should consider rewriting existing

regulations in plain language when you have the opportunity and resources to do so.

The National Partnership for Reinventing Government will issue guidance

to help you comply with these directives and to explain more fully the

elements of plain language. You should also use customer feedback and

common sense to guide your plain language efforts.

I ask the independent agencies to comply with these directives.

This memorandum does not confer any right or benefit enforceable by law

against the United States or its representatives. The Director of the Office
31886 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 111 /Wednesday, June 10, 1998 / Presidential Documents

of Management and Budget will publish this memorandum in the Federal

[FR Doc. 98–15700

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, June 1, 1998.

.

œ–

Filed 6–9–98; 10:56 am]

Billing code 3110–01–M
No. 09-11156.

#### Wilbert Bubba Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 864, 131 S. Ct. 148,

178 L. Ed. 2d 90,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6540.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-10954.

#### Miguel Figueroa, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 857, 131 S. Ct. 124,

178 L. Ed. 2d 76,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5852.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.

Same case below, 972 A.2d 551.
#### A.M. et al., Respondents, v Joseph R. Andrade, M.D., Defendant, and Chai-Luk Wo, M.D., Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 806]—

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered December 2, 2016, which denied the motion of defendant Chai-Luk Wo, M.D. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiffs allege that defendant, an ophthalmologist who saw *422infant plaintiff once and diagnosed him with a cataract, was negligent in failing to advise plaintiffs to urgently seek follow-up care from a specific pediatric ophthalmologist. Issues of fact exist as to whether defendant departed from good and accepted medical practice *(see generally Anyie B. v Bronx Lebanon Hosp.,*128 AD3d 1, 2 [1st Dept 2015]). However, plaintiffs cannot establish proximate causation.

Although defendant’s failure to urge plaintiffs to promptly consult with a specific subspecialist may have resulted in a delay in intervention until the child’s condition had worsened beyond repair, this was not the reason the child did not undergo the purportedly necessary surgery. Rather, the child did not undergo surgery because, when he later consulted with two pediatric ophthalmologists, they both determined that his cataract was congenital and, as a result, surgery would not be effective. There is no basis to infer that these diagnoses would have been different had the pediatric ophthalmologists examined the child earlier. As such, it is purely speculative that an earlier referral would have resulted in different treatment or a better result *(see Berlinger v Kraft,*60 AD3d 489, 491 [1st Dept 2009]; *Bartha v Lombardo & Assoc.,*212 AD2d 494 [2d Dept 1995]).

Concur—Tom, J.R, Renwick, Mazzarelli, Oing and Singh, JJ.
No. 09-11410.

#### Earl Williams, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 879, 131 S. Ct. 193,

178 L. Ed. 2d 116,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7068.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 541.