alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1491()'I:l"PI

---

"

--

"11-,:1.-/0

••..•....••.•.. ~

,-

L

-I"l/l.I/~

-........ ..""';'

7&,-I:I,b

--(:-Gr"", J

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

14 CFR Port 39 tJ

2-010- ;30D

[Docket No. FAA·20u.*,,-u; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM"()69-AD]

Federal Aviation Administraqon

R1N ZI2().AA64

Airworthiness Dlnctlves; BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Model

I

BAe 146 Airplanes. and Model Avro 146-RJ Airplanes

AGENCY, Federal Aviotion Administration (FAAi. DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)l

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworth1ess directive (AD) fOT the produc

I

listed above that would supersede an existing AD. liSproposed AD results from

mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by 811 aviation

authority of another country to Mentify and correct Lunsafe condition 00 an aviation

product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition L:

, '

,

During the period 2001q002, skin cracking ,was found adjacent to the butt

joint forward of frame 1~ •••. The cracks emanated from

chemically-etched pockets on the internal sqrface of the skin ..•.•.•

[Clracking in multiple adja.cent bays" •.• ~u1d compromise the

structural integrity of the fuselage in the event that the multiple cracks

joined into a single crack. • • • I

During 200S. a further report was received at BAE Systems ofa 13.78

inch crack in an AVRO J46-RJthat~ 514 flight cycles (FC)short

of the next 4 OOO-FCrepetitive inspection iDterval.

.... I· ...

The proposed AD would requir1actions tbat are injnded to address the unsafe conditi

described in the MeAl.

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (&-39) 0FflCIAl ALE COPY
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

# 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

# AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form  20-F of Elbit Systems Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December  31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), the
undersigned, Joseph Gaspar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 28, 2006

| |  |                                      | 
| |  | ------------------------------------ | 
| | 
| |  | /s/ Joseph Gaspar                    | 
| |  | Joseph GasparChief Financial Officer | 
| |
#### Com. v. King

09/30/2015

399 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 1062
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

VitalWorks Inc.
Ridgefield, Connecticut

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference to the Registration
Statements of VitalWorks Inc., formerly known as InfoCure Corporation (the
"Company"), on Forms S-3, numbers 333-45480, 333-40704, 333-37890, 333-34490,
333-88589, 333-87795, 333-73097 and 333-71109 and Forms S-8, numbers 333-96665,
333-84468, 333-72890, 333-56556, 333-40730, 333-40488, 333-39792 and 333-74773
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, respectively, of our reports
dated January 20, 2003, February 27, 2003 for Note H, on the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of the Company appearing in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.


BDO Seidman, LLP
New York, New York

March 27, 2003
#### DeJesus, Matter of, v Venettozzi

3d Dept: 145 AD3d 1275

denied
No. 10-5073.

#### Christopher Everson, Petitioner v. Brian K. Murphy, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, et al.

562 U.S. 902, 131 S. Ct. 237,

178 L. Ed. 2d 158,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6209,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 10-5230.

#### Edgar Ayala, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 910, 131 S. Ct. 262,

178 L. Ed. 2d 173,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7117.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 601 F.3d 256.
No. 10-5140.

#### Jose Luis Ramirez-Esqueda, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 249,

178 L. Ed. 2d 164,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6939.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 596 F.3d 1017.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK DEMON CALDWELL II,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC

SAFETY, named as Department of Public

Safety; B. HOUCHENS, Highway Patrol

Officer,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 18

- 15926

D.C. No. 2:17

- cv

- 02582

- DLR

- ESW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 27, 2018 **

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Patrick Demon Caldwell II appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional claims

relating to a traffic stop and impoundment of his vehicle . We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

DEC 5 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 15926

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A

. Hamilton v. Brown , 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir. 2011)

.

We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Caldwell’s action for failure to state a

claim because Caldwell fai led to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claim.

See Hebbe v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 341

- 42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se

pleadings are liberally construed, a plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to state a

plausible claim) ; see also Whren v. United States , 517 U.S. 806, 810 (1996) (no

Fourth Amendment violation when officer has probable cause to believe a traffic

violation occurred); Soldal v. Co ok County , 506 U.S. 56, 61 (1992) ( defining a

seizure claim under the Fourth Amendment) ; Serrano v. Francis , 345 F.3d 1071,

1081

- 82 (9th Cir. 2003) (setting forth elements of an equal protection claim)

.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Constar International Inc.



|                                              |  |                              
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                                          |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                              | 
|BFF Inc.                                      |  | Delaware                     
|                                              | 
|Constar Foreign Holdings, Inc.                |  | Delaware                     
|                                              | 
|Constar, Inc.                                 |  | Pennsylvania                 
|                                              | 
|Constar International Holland (Plastics) B.V. |  | The Netherlands              
|                                              | 
|Constar International UK Limited              |  | United Kingdom               
|                                              | 
|Constar Plastics of Italy S.R.L.              |  | Italy                        
|                                              | 
|DT, Inc.                                      |  | Delaware
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2262 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2262

  To amend the Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act to 
provide greater flexibility in the expenditure of funds, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 July 1 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

  Mrs. Murray (for herself and Mr. Bradley) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act to 
provide greater flexibility in the expenditure of funds, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELWHA RIVER ECOSYSTEM AND FISHERIES RESTORATION 
              EXPENDITURES.

    Section 9 of the Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration 
Act (Public Law 102-495; 106 Stat. 3178) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``for expenditure through the Assistant 
        Secretary for Fish, Wildlife, and Parks''; and
            (2) by striking ``for expenditure through the National 
        Marine Fisheries Service''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF AMERIPATH, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AmeriPath, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Donald E. Steen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Donald E. SteenDonald E. SteenChief Executive OfficerAmeriPath, Inc.March 27, 2006
# Distribution employee wins Teal Ribbon Relay

/ Published May 24, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
With the Teal Ribbon Relay ending in April, it was announced that Emmaluisa Ramos, from Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Puget Sound, Washington, is the Distribution employee who racked up the highest number of miles.

Ramos was shocked that she had the highest number of logged miles.

“I was surprised when I received an email about having the highest numbers of miles for the Teal Ribbon Relay,” Ramos said. “I didn’t expect to win, I just wanted to participate and raise awareness for Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month.”

The Teal Ribbon Relay was a virtual, enterprise-wide relay where each DLA major subordinate command was asked to compete and submit miles by running, walking or biking to raise awareness for Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention. The Teal Ribbon Relay lasted throughout the month of April.

Ramos had the highest number of miles out of all DLA Distribution employees with a total of 270.77 miles. Ramos explained what she did to achieve her high number.“The way I counted my milage is through my Fitbit and my phone,” Ramos said. “I work in the receiving/warehouse area, so I walk all day. To add distance, I would do small things like parking farther away and using stairs instead of an elevator. I also walk my dog Tibbers every day, go to parks or the beach on the weekend and walk on my treadmill every day. I even count my mileage when I do groceries and shop.”

Ramos would like to thank her husband and her dog for helping her achieve this accomplishment by being her walking buddies.
No. 09-10915.

#### Willie J. Harper, aka Willie Harper, Petitioner v. Michael McCall, Warden.

562 U.S. 855, 131 S. Ct. 119,

178 L. Ed. 2d 73,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5904.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 331 Fed. Appx. 273.
# DoD Solicits Carbon Pollution-Free Electricity

/ Published Dec. 19, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va. , 
*Editor’s Note: This news release was originally published on www.defense.gov Dec. 16*. 

Today, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Energy issued solicitations for the purchase of carbon pollution-free electricity (CFE) to support Department of Defense installations and federal agencies in two key regions. This is an important step forward in transforming how the U.S. government buys and manages electricity and putting the nation on a path to achieving a carbon pollution-free electricity sector by 2035.

“Leading the transition to clean energy is critical to U.S. national security: it can make U.S. military installations more resilient, our operating forces more agile, and our country more competitive in the face of rapidly-shifting global energy markets,” said Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks. “The Department of Defense is one of the largest electricity purchasers in the world, and when it comes to clean energy, we’re sending a clear signal to the marketplace: DoD is buying.”

A Notice of Opportunity was issued on Thursday, Dec 15 for North and South Carolina, for developers to submit CFE proposals to DLA Energy. DLA Energy intends to work with selected developer(s) as part of Duke Energy’s Green Source Advantage program to bring new clean energy supplies onto the grid commensurate with Department of Defense requirements in those states.

DLA Energy also issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) today for the purchase of electricity, including CFE, in the region operated by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT). The RFP solicits proposals that include CFE to meet a percentage of the aggregated electricity load of Department of Defense and other federal agency customers.

These solicitations follow the one-year anniversary of President Biden’s signing of the Executive Order Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability (EO 14057), which directed the federal government to use 100 percent CFE on a net annual basis by 2030, with 50 percent of that matched to federal customer demand on an hourly basis.

The Department of Defense is the largest energy user in the federal government and one of the largest electricity purchasers in the world. The Department intends to leverage that scale to accelerate the deployment of CFE while ensuring secure energy supplies for military installations and mitigating price volatility.

Supplier responses to the solicited electricity requirements, to include CFE quantities, pricing, availability, and other factors will be evaluated and negotiated. Award decisions are expected in CY2023.

To read more about these solicitations, visit sam.gov.
#### Highbridge House Ogden LLC, Respondent, v Highbridge Entities LLC, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 32]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered July 13, 2017, which granted plaintiffs motion to strike defendant’s jury demand, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The plain terms of the purchase agreement and the escrow agreement clearly evince the parties’ intent to waive their rights to a trial by jury. The right to a jury trial may be waived “in an instrument other than that representing the agreement upon which the action is founded” *(Barclays Bank of N.Y. v Heady Elec. Co.,*174 AD2d 963, 964 [3d Dept 1991], *appeal dismissed*78 NY2d 1072 [1991]; *Franklin Natl. Bank of Long Is. v Capohianco,*25 AD2d 445 [2d Dept 1966]).

The escrow agreement had a broad, clear and complete waiver with respect to “ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT,” and the express terms of both agreements memorialize the parties’ intent that the two documents be read in tandem. The purchase agreement provides that the escrow agreement, which was attached as an exhibit, was “hereby made part hereof.” It also provided that all exhibits, including the escrow agreement, were to be “incorporated into this [Purchase] Agreement as if fully set forth herein.” The escrow agreement provided that it and the purchase agreement “contain [ed] the entire agreement and understanding between the parties.” Regardless, even if the parties had not intended for the purchase agreement and the escrow agreement to be read together, this dispute, concerning return of the escrow funds, “arises out of” and is “in connection with” the escrow agreement. The broad jury waiver provision in the escrow agreement clearly applies.

We have considered the parties’ remaining contentions, and find them unavailing.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Tom, Webber, Gesmer and Singh, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2185 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2185

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

      To require the Secretary of the Treasury to transfer to the 
 Administrator of General Services the Old U.S. Mint in San Francisco, 
                        and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2185

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To require the Secretary of the Treasury to transfer to the 
 Administrator of General Services the Old U.S. Mint in San Francisco, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF U.S. MINT, SAN FRANCISCO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not 
later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer to the Administrator of 
General Services, without consideration, the property referred to as 
the ``Old U.S. Mint'', located at Fifth and Mission Streets, San 
Francisco, California, together with any improvements, structures, and 
fixtures located on the property.
    (b) Obtaining of Other Space.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, using authority and funds available under section 5134 of title 
31, United States Code, the Secretary of the Treasury may obtain by 
lease or purchase other space for the operations of the United States 
Mint carried out, prior to the date of transfer under subsection (a), 
at the Old U.S. Mint.
    (c) Space and Services Charges.--
            (1) In general.--In accordance with section 210(j) of the 
        Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 
        U.S.C. 490(j)), the Administrator of General Services shall 
        charge persons who are furnished space and services in 
        connection with the property transferred under subsection (a) 
        for the space and services.
            (2) Deposit of charges collected.--Notwithstanding any 
        other provision of law, the Administrator of General Services 
        shall deposit in the Federal Buildings Fund established by 
        section 210(f) of such Act the amounts collected under 
        paragraph (1).

SEC. 2. REPAIRS OF OLD U.S. MINT, SAN FRANCISCO.

    Nothing in this Act shall be construed to force the General 
Services Administration to repair the Old U.S. Mint building prior to 
repairs to other Federal buildings in greater need of repair.

            Passed the Senate August 2 (legislative day, July 20), 
      1994.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
# Employee Spotlight: Nancy Mize 

/ Published Sept. 16, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs. For more information, call (804) 279-3139.*

**Name:** Nancy Mize

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City

**Years of Service:** 4.5 years

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?** I’m a material handler, specifically a forklift driver. In this capacity, I work as part of a team, to perform the tasks involved in the shipping, receiving, storing and distribution of materials, parts and supplies.

**What do you like most about your job?** The things I like most about my job is supporting the warfighter. I start my workday striving to provide excellent support, from filling orders to getting them delivered to the customer. I also like working alongside my co-workers accomplishing all tasks and daily interactions with our customers.

**What is your fondest memory of working for DLA Aviation?** I came to DLA Aviation in 2020 after working at DLA Distribution here on Tinker Air Force Base for two years. I will say this. The day I started working at DLA Aviation was awesome. I had a great supervisor at that time and great teammates that made me feel very welcomed.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction and why?** I have enjoyed training some of my new co-workers and providing world-class support to our customers.

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?** I would simply tell them thank you for your sacrifice, service, and dedication to our nation.

**What was your first job?** My first job came my senior year in high school when I worked as a dishwasher at a fast-food restaurant in Shawnee, Oklahoma.

**What’s your biggest pet peeve?** My biggest pet peeve is when people lack initiative. In my opinion, you should always give your all in everything you do.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?** I love gardening, especially growing flowers and vegetables and fresh herbs. Since Oklahoma can have some crazy weather, not everything that I try to grow survives, but I still give it one heck of a try.

**If you could pick a personal motto, what would it be?** My personal motto would be “Where there’s a will, there’s a way.”

**Who is the most influential person in your life, past or present?** The most influential person in my life would definitely be my dad. He inspired me to do my best and work my hardest in all I do.
No. 09-11458.

#### Steven Sandstrom, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 881, 131 S. Ct. 202,

178 L. Ed. 2d 122,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6982.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 634.