alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32279-32280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15619]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2822]


Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy; Notice of 
Partially Closed Meeting

    The Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy (ACIEP)

[[Page 32280]]

will meet 9:00 p.m.-1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, July 22, 1998, in Room 
1107, U.S. Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW, Washington, DC 
20520. The meeting will be hosted by Committee Chairman Mike Gadbaw and 
by Assistant Secretary of State for Economic and Business Affairs Alan 
P. Larson.
    The ACIEP will first meet in closed session, which will be devoted 
to the Asian financial crisis and economic sanctions. The closed 
briefings involve discussions of classified information, pursuant to 
section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 
552(c)(1), 5 U.S.C. 442b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B). The open 
session will focus on the G-8 Summit, OECD Multilateral Agreement on 
Investment and the Anti-Bribery Convention. Members of the public may 
attend the open session beginning at approximately 11:30 a.m. as 
seating capacity allows.
    As access to the Department of State is controlled, persons wishing 
to attend the meeting should notify the ACIEP Executive Secretary by 
Wednesday, July 15, 1998.
    Each person must provide his or her name, company or organization 
affiliation, date of birth, and social security number to the ACIEP 
Secretariat at (202) 647-5968 or fax (202) 647-5713 (Attn: Sharon 
Rogers). A list will be made up for Diplomatic Security and the 
Reception personnel will direct them to Room 1107.
    For further information, contact Sharon Rogers, Secretariat, U.S. 
Department of State, Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs, Room 
6828, Main State, Washington, DC 20520. She may be reached at telephone 
number (202) 647-5968 or fax number (202) 647-5713.

    Dated: May 29, 1998.
Alan P. Larson,
Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-15619 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
No. 10-5361.

#### William Merlino, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 917, 131 S. Ct. 283,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7155.

178 L. Ed. 2d 186,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Same case below, 592 F.3d 22.
No. 10-215.

#### Michael H. Blakeney, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 897, 131 S. Ct. 355,

178 L. Ed. 2d 149,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6395.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 985 A.2d 463.
# DLA cybersecurity team reminds employees to be vigilant against phishing 

/ Published Aug. 20, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the work environment upside down with thousands of Defense Logistics Agency employees switching to fulltime telework with little to no notice. The agency’s cybersecurity experts intensified efforts to thwart hackers directly attacking DLA’s information technology networks through phishing and other tactics, and they're asking for employees' help. 

Hackers play into employees’ innate desire to remain security-minded, sending alerts with unexpected warnings to cause alarm. They attempt to spur interest in manufactured problems such as a routine administrative or human resource issue. They could also focus on current events to prey on employees’ heightened stress, fear, distraction and curiosity. 

Phishing is one of the most common forms of social engineering tactics and uses malicious emails or websites to trick individuals into providing personal or corporate information. Originating email addresses or malicious websites look similar to real addresses.  

“Phishing is the No. 1 threat to the Department of Defense and to DLA. By providing our end-users with an email Spam Alert button, DLA has enabled our employees and contractors to act as an additional attack warning sensor,” said Paul Resh, chief of the DLA Computer Emergency Response Team.

DLA employees and contractors are the agency’s first line of defense in protecting networks, systems and data, he added.

The CERT monitors cybercriminals’ tactics and trends and helps refine employees’ ability to identify phishing attempts by sending monthly phishing emails to random employees. When the DLA Phishing Exercise Program began in 2014, about 16% of DLA users failed the exercises. The failure rate steadily declined to 5.5% in late 2018 after the CERT initiated an education campaign about what to look for in phishing attacks. The trend reversed in 2019 and has climbed to a current average of almost 10%. 

Phishing indicators to look for include:

•    Emails that appear to come from inside DOD but have the subject line tagged with “Non-DOD Source;”•    Inconsistencies in the sender’s domain information such as a .com address listed as .net or .co without the “m.” Other common domains include .org, .info, .net and .edu;  •    References or links in the email that don’t match the sender’s domain;•    Unsolicited events of which you have no prior knowledge;•    Email requiring action on systems or applications you don’t have access to;•    Odd-looking URLs that are revealed when you hover over the link in the email; and•    Simple indicators like misspellings or outlandish rewards or riches.  

Employees who spot such indicators in emails should refer the email to the DLA CERT by clicking on the DLA Spam Alert button in the upper right corner of the main Outlook email ribbon and explain why the email is suspicious. Employees can also open a new email, attach the suspicious message and forward the email to dla.spamalert@dla.mil.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34079-34080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 5, 8, 31, 45, and 53

[FAC 97-05; Item XI]


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Technical Amendments

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Technical amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes amendments to the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation in order to update references and make editorial changes.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 22, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS 
Building, Washington, DC 20405, (202) 501-4755.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 5, 8, 31, 45, and 53

    Government procurement.

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
Edward C. Loeb,
Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.

    Therefore, 48 CFR Parts 5, 8, 31, 45, and 53 are amended as set 
forth below:
    1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Parts 5, 8, 31, 45, and 53 
continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 
U.S.C. 2473(c).

PART 5--PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS


5.201  [Amended]

    2. Section 5.201 is amended in paragraph (b)(2) by revising ``(see 
5.205(d))'' to read ``(see 5.205(e))''.

PART 8--REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES


8.404  [Amended]

    3. Section 8.404 is amended in the first sentence of paragraph (a) 
by revising ``13.202(c)(3)'' to read ``13.303-2(c)(3)''.

[[Page 34080]]

PART 31--CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES


31.002  [Amended]

    4. Section 31.002 is amended by revising ``Guidance for New 
Contractors'' to read ``Information for Contractors''.

PART 45--GOVERNMENT PROPERTY


45.607-2  [Amended]

    5. Section 45.607-2 is amended in the third sentence of paragraph 
(b) by revising ``DLA:SIP'' to read ``DLSC-LC''.

PART 53--FORMS

    6. Section 53.101 is amended by revising the last sentence to read 
as follows:


Sec. 53.101  Requirements for use of forms.

    * * * The specific location of each requirement is identified in 
subpart 53.2.

[FR Doc. 98-16122 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
No. 10M24.

#### Espiridion Aranda, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 820, 131 S. Ct. 376,

178 L. Ed. 2d 12,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6210.

October 4, 2010.

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
CAAP-12-0000793

#### J.F. v. J.F.

Affirmed
Note to Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2007 - 0492

SUBJECT: Meeting with Coarse Particle Coalition on 10/13/10 On 10/13/10 from 11:00 a.m. until noon, EPA staff met with members of the Coarse Particle Coalition . Attendees were Scott Jenkins , Karen Martin , Lydia Wegman , Mark Schmidt (all from EPA); John Hay den and Emily Coy ner (National Stone, Sand, and Gravel Association); John Richards (Air Control Techniques); David Ailor (National Oilseed Processors Association); Tamara Thies (National Cattlemen's Beef Association) . On the phone were Steve Silverman (EPA), Kurt Blase (Coarse Particle Coalition), Nick Goldstein (?), Jennifer Gratigo (?), Glenn Urick (?). We discussed the Coalition's comments on the draft PM Policy Assessment.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER

Appellate case name: Brian Cweren and The Cweren Law Firm, P LLC v. Eureka

Multifamily Group, L.P.

, Rene Campos, Jimmy Arnold, and Chris

Robertson

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00 470

- CV

Trial court case number: 202 1

- 18448

Trial court: 55 th District Court of Harris County

Appellants , Brian Cweren and The Cweren Law Firm PLLC, have filed a notice of appeal

of the trial court ’ s denial of their Motion to Dismiss Under the Texa s Ci tizens Pa rticipation Act.

On April 12 , 2022, we abated this appeal while th e parties participated in medi ation

.

On July 11, 2022, appellants filed a n unopposed motion to reinstate and proceed with the

appeal. A ppellants advised the Cour t that the “ [p]ar ties wer e un successful in their attempts to

mediate th[e] matter and settlement discussions ha [d] ceased. ” Appellants thus requ est ed that the

Court “ reinstate and proceed with the appeal. ”

We grant appellant ’ s motion and REINST ATE th e appeal on the Court ’ s activ e docket.

I t is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_____

/s/ Julie Countiss

_________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ July 14, 2022

_______
No. 10-5007.

#### Kevin D. Moore, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 898, 131 S. Ct. 226,

178 L. Ed. 2d 151,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6315.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 559.
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2013 -**  **04 66**
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

NISSIM CORP.,

Appellant,

v.

Teresa Stanek Rea, ACTING DIRECTOR,

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK 

OFFICE,

Appellee,

AND

TIME WARNER, INC., WARNER BROS. 

ENTERTAINMENT, INC., WARNER HOME VIDEO, 

AND NEW LINE HOME ENTERTAINMENT,

Appellees.

__________________________ 

2012-1409

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in 

Reexamination No. 95/000,312. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

Case: 12-1409 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 08/02/2013
NISSIM CORP. v. REA 2

Before RADER, Chief Judge BRYSON, and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges. 

BRYSON, Circuit Judge. 

O R D E R

The parties jointly move to remand this appeal to the 

Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) due 

to settlement.

The parties state that they have settled the case and 

move to remand so that the Board can consider a petition 

to terminate the underlying reexamination. We grant the 

motion. In doing so, however, we take no position as to 

whether the Board should grant the petition. 

Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered that: 

The motion to remand is granted.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 2, 2013

s25 

Case: 12-1409 Document: 53 Page: 2 Filed: 08/02/2013
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2281]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceeding

    Petitions for reconsideration and clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice 
and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of 
these documents are available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 
M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to 
these petitions must be filed July 1, 1998. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of 
the Commission's rule (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must 
be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has 
expired.

Subject: Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings (GC 
Docket No. 97-113).
Number of Petitions filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15940 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
# Pinwheel parade focuses on making children priority number one

/ Published April 20, 2022
Richmond, Va., 
While April is designated as Child Abuse Prevention Month, the  Defense Department declares its commitment to the safety and wellbeing of children all year long. In 2022, DOD leads these efforts with the campaign “All In To End Child Abuse.”

Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, is supporting this effort in a number of ways, including hosting a Pinwheel Parade April 15, that included more than 95 DSCR employees and their family members.

“The event couldn’t have gone any better. I can’t say thank you enough to everyone who played a role in this campaign,” said Rhiannon Jackson, the family advocacy program manager in Security and Emergency Services for DLA Installation Management Richmond. “The parade was particularly special to me because it was the first in-person event I’ve been able to hold since COVID-19 restrictions have loosened up a bit. It was awesome to see everyone support the cause and our CDC children.”

The parade began at the Bettye Ackerman-Cobb Child Development Center and looped around Parker Pond before returning to the CDC to plant blue pinwheels in recognition of the event.

Police and fire vehicles, and mascots McGruff, the crime dog, and Sparky, the fire dog, rounded out the parade procession. Julio Clavell, DLA Installation Management Richmond chief of police spoke at the event.

“National Child Abuse Prevention Month is an annual observance in the United States, dedicated to raising awareness and preventing child abuse,” said Clavell. “This month especially, but every day here on out, we as Americans must be the voice for victims of abuse and maltreatment. From the bottom of my heart not only as the chief of police but also as a father that everyone in our community make a diligent effort to report any child abuse and maltreatment incident that you see or know about.”

“Let us be the voice of these children and promote prevention before tragedy strikes,” said Clavell.

“All In To End Child Abuse” is  DOD’s campaign to end child abuse within its communities. To learn how you can be a champion for child safety through your Family Advocacy Program, visit militaryonesource.mil/end-child-abuse.
EXHIBIT 32.2certification pursuant to 18 u.s.c. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of thesarbanes-oxley act of 2002The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to my knowledgethat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification isprovided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or “filed” for anypurpose whatsoever.       Date: November 2, 2005 Name: /s/ Russell Van Zandt            Russell Van Zandt    Title: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33441-33442]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33604]


Lone Star Railroad, Inc.--Acquisition Exemption--Union Pacific 
Railroad Company

    Lone Star Railroad, Inc. (LSRI), a Class III rail carrier, has 
filed a notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire through 
lease a Union Pacific Railroad Company rail line as follows: all 
Abilene, TX yard tracks south of the Abilene wye track and south of the 
east-west main line, including the A&S Industrial Lead from milepost 
0.0 to milepost 4.30, a distance of approximately 8.24 miles, at 
Abilene, Taylor County, TX.
    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or shortly after 
May 26, 1998.
    This proceeding is related to STB Finance Docket No. 33604 (Sub-No. 
1), Southern Switching Company--Operation Exemption--Lone Star 
Railroad, Inc., wherein Southern Switching Company (SSC), also a Class 
III rail carrier, has concurrently filed a notice of exemption to 
operate the Abilene line pursuant to an operating agreement with 
LSRI.<SUP>1</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ LSRI and SSC are commonly controlled by Gregory B. Cundiff. 
See Gregory B. Cundiff--Continuance in Control Exemption--Lone Star 
Railroad, Inc. and Southern Switching Company, Finance Docket No. 
32501 (ICC served May 27, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke does not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33604, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Thomas F. McFarland, Jr., 20 North Wacker Drive, Suite 1330, 
Chicago, IL 60606-2902.

    Decided: June 12, 1998.


[[Page 33442]]


    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16319 Filed 6-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P .
#### In the Matter of Brandon K. and Another, Infants. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Linda *1340P., Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 914]

— Appeal from an order of Family Court, Erie County (Rosa, J.), entered January 17, 2002, which directed respondent to submit to a psychological evaluation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Family Court properly exercised its broad authority in directing respondent to submit to a psychological evaluation *(see*Family Ct Act § 251 [a]; *Matter of*Henrietta D. v Jack K., 272 AD2d 995 [2000]). Contrary to respondent’s contentions, the court’s directive effectuated rather than altered the dispositional order, and the order was not made in violation of respondent’s right to counsel *(cf. Matter of*Patricia L. v Steven L., 119 AD2d 221, 224-225 [1986]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Scott E. Willkomm, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Scott E. Willkomm

Scott E. Willkomm
President
November 6, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re
Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### People v Gressler

App Div, 3d Dept, 4/19/16 (Rensselaer)

dismissed 8/31/16 (DiFiore, Ch. J.)