alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S DECEMBER 31, 1997 AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,150,362
<SECURITIES>                                15,573,617
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,072,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                   300,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,484,679
<PP&E>                                       3,451,925
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,036,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,229,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,497,906
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           911
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,730,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,229,175
<SALES>                                     22,645,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,645,442
<CGS>                                        5,342,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,342,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,554,262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                81,223
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,506,633)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,506,633)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,506,633)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)


</TABLE>
p120520.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: Yes

PMN: 12-0520

Focus Ready Draft 9/13/2012

ENGINEER: Hall \ BCS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1
p120520.eng

 o

SAT (concerns) (08/31/2012):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: Analogs: 

 // Human Health Related Cases:

Migration to groundwater: Rapid

PBT rating: P1B3T1 Anion: P1B3T1; Cation: P1B1T1

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation, XB Testing (Testing

desired)

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 29 ppb),

XB Testing (Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

Page 2
p120520.eng

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0520

 

Page 3
p120520.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0520

Page 4
p120520.eng

Page 5
p120520.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0520

 

Page 6
p120520.eng

Page 7
2017-1101.

#### State v. West.

Muskingum App. No. CT2015-0050, 2016-Ohio-5032. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
#### In the Matter of State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Respondent, v James W. Clark et al., Respondents, and 21st Century Assurance Company, Appellant.

[65 NYS3d 704]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, Bronx *564County (Elizabeth A. Taylor, J.), entered on or about August 3, 2016, which granted the CPLR article 75 petition and permanently stayed the subject uninsured motorist arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The hearing court properly found that additional respondents Olga Leon-Lobello and Santo Lobello were insured by additional respondent 21st Century Assurance Company on the date of the subject accident. 21st Century did not show that it timely mailed the requisite renewal documents to the Lobellos (see *Weathers v Hartford Ins. Group,*77 NJ 228, 234-235, 390 A2d 548, 550-551 [1978]; *Lopez v New Jersey Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Assn.,*239 NJ Super 13, 24, 570 A2d 994, 999 [App Div 1990], *cert denied*122 NJ 131, 584 A2d 206 [1990]; NJ Admin Code § 11:3-8.3 [b]).

Even assuming that 21st Century had demonstrated that it mailed the requisite documents, it is undisputed that the Lobel-los paid the premium within the policy coverage period, and six days prior to the accident. It is also undisputed that the Lobello’s promptly notified 21st Century of the accident, and that 21st Century did not disclaim coverage until a day later. Moreover, 21st Century did not refund the premium payment until nearly two weeks after the accident. Under these circumstances, 21st Century’s acceptance of the Lobello’s premium estops them from denying coverage *(see Cervone v New Jersey Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Assn.,*239 NJ Super 25, 29, 570 A2d 999, 1001-1002 [App Div 1990]).

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.92

              Call Option Agreement-Participation Letter of Shenyang Focus Media

                   ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER FOR PARTICIPATION OF
                              CALL OPTION AGREEMENT

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD., (registered address: Room 1003 F,
No.1027, Changning Road, Changning District, Shanghai) (hereinafter the
"PARTICIPATING SHAREHOLDER"), and SHENYANG FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISING CO., LTD.
(registered address: Room B606, No. 206 Nanjing Street (N), City Plaza, Heping
District, Shenyang) (hereinafter the "NEW TARGET COMPANY"), as independent
party, hereby agree to participate in the Shareholders' Voting Rights Call
Option Agreement among Focus Media Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter
"FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY"), Shanghai Focus Media Advertisement Co., Ltd. and
other relevant parties (hereinafter the "CALL OPTION AGREEMENT") dated March 28
2005. The Participating Shareholder hereby grant Focus Media Technology with an
irrevocable equity Call Option (hereinafter "CALL OPTION") in respect to 70% of
the equity share of the New Target Company (hereinafter "NEWLY INCREASED EQUITY
SHARE") held by the Participating Shareholder. Once this Acknowledgement Letter
is executed by the Participating Shareholder and the New Target Company, the New
Target Company and the Newly Increased Equity Share shall be deemed to be the
"Target Company" and "Option Equity" defined under the Call Option Agreement,
and the Participating Shareholder and the New Target Company shall be deemed to
have made the same undertakings and warranties related to the New Target Company
and Option Equity with those of the Shareholders and Target Companies under the
Call Option Agreement have made related to "Target Company" and "Option Equity"
(to the extent that is related and applicable to the Participating Shareholder
and the Participated Target Company), and acknowledged and agreed to
respectively perform the same obligations in the Call Option Agreement (to the
extent that is related and applicable to the Participating Shareholder and the
Participated Target Company).

<PAGE>

              Call Option Agreement-Participation Letter of Shenyang Focus Media

                                [EXECUTION PAGE]

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERISEMENT CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              -----------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006

SHENYANG FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISING CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              -----------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006

FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              -----------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Good Clinical Practices In Investigational Product Research 
Meeting

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Office of Regulatory 
Affairs, New Orleans District Office) is announcing the following 
meeting: ``Good Clinical Practices In Investigational Product 
Research.'' The topics to be discussed are FDA regulatory requirements 
for the conduct of investigational product research and practical 
issues, such as, how to prepare for a data audit, what to expect during 
an investigation, and how to get current information from FDA. The 
purpose of this meeting is to promote and encourage open dialogue 
between FDA and professionals involved in investigational product 
research: Physicians, researchers, research coordinators, nurses, 
allied health professionals, and any other interested parties.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on Friday, July 17, 1998; 
registration from 7:45 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.; meeting from 8:30 a.m. to 5 
p.m.
    Location: The meeting will be held at the Louisiana State 
University Medical Center, Medical Education Bldg., Lecture Room A, 
1901 Perdido, New Orleans, LA 70112.
    Contact: Rebecca A. Asente, Food and Drug Administration, New 
Orleans District Office (HFR-SE440), 4298 Elysian Fields Ave., New 
Orleans, LA 70122, 504-589-6344, ext. 158, FAX 504-589-6360.
    Registration: Send registration information (including name, title, 
firm name, address, telephone, and fax number) to the contact person by 
Friday, July 10, 1998. There is no registration fee for this meeting. 
Attendance will be limited to the first 200 applicants, therefore, 
interested parties are encouraged to register early. Priority will be 
given to those individuals located in Louisiana and Mississippi. 
Individuals located outside these States may register to attend the 
meeting and will be accepted if space is available.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Rebecca A. Asente at least 7 days in advance.

    Dated: May 21, 1998.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 98-14463 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 8, 2020

No. 04-19-00883-CR

Gabrielle DE ARROYO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR5788

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

After this court granted two extensions, and then this court’s en banc order extended the 

due date for all pending briefs until June 30, 2020, Appellant’s brief was due on June 30, 2020.

Appellant did not timely file the brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief. 

On July 27, 2020, we ordered Appellant’s counsel Kimbel Ward-Neal to file either a motion to 

dismiss or the brief by August 6, 2020. 

Counsel filed a motion for an extension of time to file the brief, which we granted to 

August 21, 2020. Counsel filed another motion for an extension of time, which we granted to 

September 25, 2020, but we warned that any future motion for an extension of time would be 

disfavored. We also warned counsel that, to protect Appellant’s rights, this court could initiate 

proceedings under Rule 38. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (4). 

To date, counsel has still not filed the brief. 

We ORDER Kimbel Ward-Neal to file the brief within TEN DAYS of the date of this 

order. If no brief is filed by that date, we will abate this appeal to the trial court for an 

abandonment hearing without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of October, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<MULTIPLIER>       1
       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                             314,173
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      513,618
<ALLOWANCES>                       51,936
<INVENTORY>                        1,069,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   2,004,350
<PP&E>                             1,020,202
<DEPRECIATION>                     809,776 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     2,243,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              349,377
<BONDS>                            0
<COMMON>                           97,408
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                         4,174,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       2,243,377
<SALES>                            3,585,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   3,585,847
<CGS>                              1,744,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      1,744,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   1,788,762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   (29,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    92,580
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                92,580
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       92,580
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                      .05
        

</TABLE>
#### MIMS Master Fund, L.P., Appellant-Respondent, v Joseph A. Cambi, Respondent-Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 10]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered April 11, 2017, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on defendant’s liability under the guaranty agreement, denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim for fraud and denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and its motion to dismiss the fraud counterclaim granted, and the matter remanded for further proceedings, without costs.

The motion court should have granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s liability under the guaranty. Plaintiff established that defendant executed an absolute and unconditional personal guaranty to plaintiff that the entities under defendant’s control would perform all of their obligations under or in connection with a partnership agreement with plaintiff. Defendant’s conclusory allegation that he was unaware that it was a personal guaranty does not raise an issue of fact as to whether he was fraudulently induced into signing the documents (see *Citibank, N.A. v Uri Schwartz & Sons Diamonds Ltd.,*97 AD3d 444, 446-447 [1st Dept 2012]). We reject defendant’s arguments that the guaranty is not enforceable because it did not run to the beneficence of the obligations guaranteed. His remaining allegations of fraudulent inducement, largely negated by the express terms of the written guaranty, do not create triable issues of fact with respect to a bona fide defense (see *e.g. Banner Indus. v Key B.H.*Assoc., 170 AD2d 246 [1st Dept 1991]).

Plaintiff also demonstrated that defendant failed to perform *450under the guaranty when he did not fulfill the entities’ obligations in connection with the partnership agreement *(see generally Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank, B.A., “Rabobank Intl.,” N.Y. Branch v Navarro,*25 NY3d 485, 492 [2015]). Defendant’s attacks on the validity and scope of the unambiguous personal guaranty are unavailing.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


         <ARTICLE>                     5
         <LEGEND>
     Financial  Data Schedule for 10KSB for the period ended August 31, 1998 for
Mega Holding Corp.
         </LEGEND>
       


         <S>                                            <C>
         <PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
         <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               AUG-31-1998
         <PERIOD-START>                                  SEP-1-1997
         <PERIOD-END>                                    AUG-31-1998
         <CASH>                                           19,612
         <SECURITIES>                                    669,158
         <RECEIVABLES>                                   195,502
         <ALLOWANCES>                                          0
         <INVENTORY>                                           0
         <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 60,998
         <PP&E>                                           69,793
         <DEPRECIATION>                                   51,692
         <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  413,323
         <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            38,308
         <BONDS>                                               0
         <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
         <PREFERRED>                                           0
         <COMMON>                                         36,303
         <OTHER-SE>                                      409,157
         <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    999,113
         <SALES>                                       1,530,610
         <TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,552,120
         <CGS>                                           246,359
         <TOTAL-COSTS>                                   552,313
         <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
         <LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
         <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
         <INCOME-PRETAX>                                 961,847
         <INCOME-TAX>                                    513,112
         <INCOME-CONTINUING>                             448,735
         <DISCONTINUED>                                        0
         <EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
         <CHANGES>                                             0
         <NET-INCOME>                                    448,735
         <EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.12
         <EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.12



        

</TABLE>
2017-1096.

#### In re C.D.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-779, 2017-Ohio-5870. Motion for stay of execution of judgment denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 24, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. Farmers Bancshares, Inc., Hardinsburg, Kentucky; to acquire 
Leitchfield Deposit Bancshares Insurance, Inc., Leitchfield, Kentucky, 
and thereby engage in acting as principal, agent, or broker for 
insurance that is directly related to an extension of credit by the 
bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries pursuant, to Sec.  
225.28(b)(11) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 4, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15301 Filed 6-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit 4.3


 


May 24, 2006


 


True Energy Trust


2300, 530 – 8th Avenue S.W.


Calgary, AB T2P 3S8


 


Re:          Registration
Statement on Form F-80


 


Ladies and Gentleman:


 


We hereby
consent to the reference to our firm name and the use of our opinion under the
section entitled “The Arrangement – Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations”
contained in the information circular of Shellbridge Oil & Gas, Inc. dated
May 24, 2006, filed as part of the Registration Statement on Form F-80 of True
Energy Trust registering its Trust Units under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.


 


	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  McCarthy Tétrault LLP
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

147 KA 10-01907 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT,

V ORDER
WILLIAM REED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (VICTORIA M. WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR APPELLANT.
LINDA GEHRON, SYRACUSE, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a new sentence of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered February 11, 2010 imposed upon defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. Defendant was resentenced pursuant to the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act upon his 2003 conviction.
It is hereby ORDERED that the sentence so appealed from is unanimously affirmed ( see People v Hill , ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 18, 2011]).

Entered: February 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-034-CV

IN RE WILLIAM EMMANUEL 						            RELATOR

GLENN HARTFIELD	

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  The Tarrant County District Clerk’s office and Judge Mike Thomas of Criminal District Court Number Four have both informed this court that they have not received relator’s “motion requesting to check out the trial records on loan.”  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

									PER CURIAM

PANEL:  DAUPHINOT, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  February 12, 2009