alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Indo-Pacific deputy commander recognized for strengthening local partnerships

/ Published June 25, 2019

Defense Logistics Agency Indo-Pacific Commander Navy Capt. Kristin Acquavella recognized DLA Indo-Pacific Military Deputy Commander Army Col. Brent Coryell for his tour-of-duty accomplishments during a farewell luncheon at the River Bend Golf Course at Camp Humphreys, Korea.

Coryell was applauded for synchronizing and strengthening DLA’s partnership with U.S. Indo-Pacific Command while ensuring vital information flowed among key stakeholders such as the U.S. Transportation Command, U.S. Forces Korea, U.S. Forces Japan, Eighth U.S. Army, Fifth U.S. Air Force and U.S. Seventh Fleet.

Coryell departs Korea in July for an assignment as the commandant of the Army’s Logistics University at Fort Lee, Virginia. Army Col. Julia Bell is scheduled to replace Coryell.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Moore Wallace Incorporated, a corporation continued
under the laws of Canada (the Corporation), hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Corporation for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

/s/ Mark A. AngelsonDated: November 10, 2003Name:
    
    Mark A. AngelsonTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Moore Wallace Incorporated, a corporation continued
under the laws of Canada (the Corporation), hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Corporation for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

/s/ Mark S. HiltweinDated: November 10, 2003Name:
    
    Mark S. HiltweinTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer
Amendment to Put Option Agreement


 EXHIBIT 10.62(b) 
  
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 PUT OPTION AGREEMENT 
  
 Amendment made this 31st day of August, 2004 by and between, PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“PriceSmart”) and Sol and Helen Price Trust dated February 20 1970 (the “Trust”). 
  
 Recitals 
  
 A) PriceSmart and Trust are parties to a Put Option Agreement dated December 15, 2003 (the Put Agreement”) as supplemented by an
Agreement Regarding Material Terms dated February 12, 2004. 
  
 B) The parties
wish to amend the Put Agreement as provided herein. 
  
 NOW
THEREFORE, the parties hereto amend the Put Agreement as follows. 
  
 1. Paragraph Number 2 of the Put Agreement is amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “2. Term of Put Option. The term of this put option shall begin on the date of this Agreement and end November 30, 2004.”

  
 2. Subject to the amendment herein the Put Agreement remains in full
force and effect. 
  
 Executed as of the date first written above. 
  

							
	 Sol and Helen Price Trust
 dated
February 20, 1970
	 	PriceSmart, Inc.
				
	 by
	 	 /s/ Sol Price

	 	 by
	 	 /s/ Robert M. Gans


	 	 	 Sol Price – Trustee
	 	 	 	 Robert M. Gans – Executive Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000065873
<NAME>                        ALLTEL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000


<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          8,269
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,194,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                   45,840
<INVENTORY>                                   201,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,700,116
<PP&E>                                     11,610,694
<DEPRECIATION>                              5,316,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             11,840,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,491,177
<BONDS>                                     4,214,460
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                       502
<COMMON>                                      312,656
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,696,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               11,840,900
<SALES>                                       479,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,223,220
<CGS>                                         484,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,960,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               24,593
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            224,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,904,641
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,201,067
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,703,574
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      5.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    5.36



</TABLE>
#### Zellat v. McCulloch

09/06/2016

81 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1038
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15500]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, June 15, 1998.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Eccles Federal Reserve Building infrastructure enhancement 
project.
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Lynn S. Fox, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement that not only 
lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information 
about the meeting.

    Dated: June 5, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15500 Filed 6-5-98; 3:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-M
No. 09-11428.

#### Keith Thomas, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 880, 131 S. Ct. 196,

178 L. Ed. 2d 118,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6815.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 978 A.2d 1211.
EXHIBIT 32.2
  
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    In connection with the Annual Report of The Dewey Electronics Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen P. Krill, Treasurer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
    /s/ Stephen P. Krill
  Stephen P. Krill, Treasurer
 Date:  September 26, 2011
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Dewey Electronics Corporation and will be retained by The Dewey Electronics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Gunther v Vilceus

2d Dept: 142 AD3d 639

denied
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Benton and Bray Argued at Richmond, Virginia

ROBERT RAYFIELD JONES MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1142-96-2 PER CURIAM JUNE 17, 1997 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND James B. Wilkinson, Judge

Patricia P. Nagel, Assistant Public Defender (David J. Johnson, Public Defender, on brief), for appellant.

Ruth Ann Morken, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

This appeal raises the issue whether the trial judge erred

in refusing to give to the jury the proffered instruction on

parole. For the reasons more particularly stated in Mosby v.

Commonwealth , 24 Va. App. 284, 482 S.E.2d 72 (1997), we affirm

the trial judge's refusal to give the instruction.

Affirmed

.

Benton, J., dissenting.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Walker v.

Commonwealth , ___ Va. App. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (1997),

(Benton, J., dissenting), I would reverse the ruling and remand

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - for a new trial.
No. 09-11486.

#### Robert Glen Davis, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 883, 131 S. Ct. 208,

178 L. Ed. 2d 125,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6912.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### Roberts v. W.C.A.B. (Dept. of Public Welfare)37

03/23/2016

856 MAL (2015)

37

. Reconsideration Denied April 27, 2016.

Denied
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1733

In re: GARY WARREN HANCOCK, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petitions for Writ of Mandamus.

(8:13-cr-00274-RWT-1)

Submitted: September 23, 2014 Decided: September 25, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Warren Hancock, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary Warren Hancock, Jr., petitions for a writ of 

mandamus seeking an order directing the recusal of the district 

court judge and a change of venue. We conclude that Hancock is 

not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used 

only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States 

Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, 

mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a 

clear right to the relief sought, In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan 

Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988), and when there are no 

other means by which the relief sought could be granted. In re 

Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, we deny the petitions for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED
No. 10-5155.

#### Troy Luke Burks, Petitioner v. Colie Rushton, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 906, 131 S. Ct. 251,

178 L. Ed. 2d 166,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6880.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 375.
#### Reina Nunez, Respondent, v George Bardwil, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Submitted February 6, 2017;

decided March 28, 2017

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2271

To provide for the transfer of certain tuna fishing vessels documented in

the United States to foreign registry.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. BREAUX introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To provide for the transfer of certain tuna fishing vessels

documented in the United States to foreign registry.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF REGISTRY FOR CERTAIN FISH4 ING VESSELS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The transfer of registry of a tuna

6 fishing vessel which is an agreement vessel documented

7 under the laws of the United States to foreign registry

8 shall not be treated, for purposes of the Merchant Marine

9 Act, 1936, or any other law of the United States, as—

10 (1) a disposition vessel, or
2

S 2271 IS

1 (2) a failure to meet any substantial obligation

2 under an agreement entered into between the owner

3 or operator of the vessel and the Secretary,

4 if the vessel continues to be owned, directly or indirectly,

5 by a United States person and to be operated in compli6 ance with section 307 of the Marine Mammal Protection

7 Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1417).

8 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—

9 (1) any term defined in section 607(k) of the

10 Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 App. U.S.C.

11 1177(k)) that is used in this section shall have the

12 meaning given that term in that section; and

13 (2) the term ‘‘United States person’’ has the

14 meaning given that term in section 7701(a)(30) of

15 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C.

16 7701(a)(30)).

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply to

18 any transfer of registry effected before January 1, 1996.

Æ
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

128 A.3d 218-222

#### Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Travelers Indem. Co.; Travelers Indem. Co., In re

12/07/2015

441 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 115 A.3d 342
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 30675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 10


Rules of Practice; Proposed Amendments

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 3, 1998, the Commission published in the Federal 
Register a notice requesting comments on proposed amendments to its 
Rules of Practice, which govern most adjudicatory proceedings brought 
under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, except for reparations 
actions. The original comment period expires on June 2, 1998. 63 FR 
16453 (April 3, 1998). In a letter dated May 28, 1998, the Committee on 
Commodities and Futures Law of the New York State Bar Association 
requested an extension of the comment period. To assure that an 
adequate opportunity is provided for the submission of meaningful 
comments, the Commission has determined to extend the comment period by 
an additional thirty (30) days.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 2, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed amendments should be sent to Jean 
A. Webb, Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three 
Lafayette Center, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581. Comments 
may be sent by electronic mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3d0c6c0d1c6d7c2d1dae3c0c5d7c08dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ffceaecfdeafbeefdf6cfece9fbeca1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>. Reference should 
be made to ``Proposed Amendments to the Rules of Practice.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Mihans, Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Enforcement, at 
(202) 418-5399 or David Merrill, Office of Chief Counsel, at (202) 
5120, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on this 1st day of June, 1998, by the 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-14961 Filed 6-2-98; 2:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 10.4

    Memorandum of Affiliation Between Mitchell J. Hart and Terra Systems Inc.


It is agreed between Terra Systems Inc. and Mitchell J. Hart that Mr. Hart shall
affiliate with Terra Systems Inc. under the following conditions:

Base Pay shall be $120,000.00 per year. Payment to be made on the 1st and 15th
of each month at the rate of $5,000.00 per pay period.

The term of Affiliation shall be Minimum of three years.

All Holidays and Vacation shall be paid and taken at such a time that Mr. Hart's
absence will not interfere with the business at hand of MIE.

A monthly vehicle allowance of $500.00 shall be given to Mr. Hart.

Office space will be provided for Mr. Hart in Soda Springs Idaho for the term of
the agreement.

Office expenses shall be provided by MIE for the Soda Springs office.

Should early termination of the Mr. Hart's position occur for any reason, Mr.
Hart shall receive full and usual benefits for up to 52 weeks. As Mr. Hart will
be an officer and director of the company, base salary severance will be
protected by the by-laws of the public company.

MIE or TSYI shall cover the cost of COBRA for an interim until a benefits
package is fully in place as approved by the Board of Directors.

Should Mr. Hart be required by the company to relocate from Soda Springs Idaho,
all reasonable moving expenses including acquisition and disposition of Real
Estate shall be paid by the company.

  Agreed to for:

   Terra Systems Inc.                                Mitchell J. Hart


   /s/ Clayton Timothy                               /s/ Mitchell J. Hart
   -----------------------                           -----------------------
   Chief Executive Officer

   Date: May 12. 2005                                Date: May 12, 2005



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# DLA Troop Support celebrates retirement of two civilian employees

/ Published Nov. 30, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support celebrated over 63 years of combined service during a retirement ceremony November 29 in Philadelphia.

Barbara Quarles, Medical supply chain, retired after 33 years of service. Gail Vandervoort, Clothing and Textiles supply chain, retired after 30 years of service.

Army Brig. Gen. Eric Shirley, DLA Troop Support Commander, presided over the ceremony. He congratulated the two retirees and recognized their family for their support and sacrifice over the years.

“The children and families who grow up with a mom or relative working for DLA Troop Support suffer some of the same sacrifices as the warfighters they support,” he said. “But those sacrifices have not gone unnoticed or unappreciated. So on behalf of our warfighters throughout the world: thank you for your sacrifice.”

Each retiree received a certificate of retirement, DLA Troop Support mementos, a pin and a commander’s coin with a personalized note from Shirley.

Quarles began her career in 1988 as a supplier in the emergency supply unit where she was responsible for supporting contingency missions by providing essential equipment to ships at sea. She said she plans on getting involved in community activities and projects upon retirement, but will miss working with and supporting her teammates at DLA Troop Support.

“I am deeply honored to receive these wonderful mementos for my time here at troop support and I will miss working here at DLA,” she said.

Vandervoort began her career as a textile technologist in 1991 where she provided technical expertise for writing specifications and other documents required to procure items. Upon retirement she’s moving to Colorado to be close to family.

“I appreciate the many years I worked for [DLA] Troop Support. I’m grateful I was able to support the warfighter ... I’m most grateful for all the friends and colleagues that I’ve met over the years, and I will miss them all.”