alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SALES AGREEMENT

July  7,  2004

Jackson  County  Fire  Rescue
Chief  Robby  Brown
4445  Marion  Street
Marianna,  FL  32448

Dear  Robby,

Thank  you  for  the  opportunity  to  quote  the  following:


  (1)   FRJ-1250  Fire  Rescue  Jet Mercury Marine Model 175 HP V6 SportJet with
        standard  equipment.
        Options  included:
          -     3-year  Mercury  engine  warranty
          -     5-year  hull  warranty
          -     VHF  Radio
          -     Rescue  Canisters
          -     Push  bumper
          -     Hand  held  spotlight
          -     72"  Najo  Spine  Board
          -     Dual  water  discharge  system  with  dual  cap  holders
          -     Wrench  holder  with  two  T-464  Spanner  Wrenches
          -     Service/parts  manuals
          -     Standard  VHF  with  hailer
          -     Matching  bimini  top
          -     Matching  full  cover  for  travel  and  storage
          -     FRJ  operations  manual
          -     Galvanized  single  axle  trailer
          -     1  day  on-site  operation  training  when  delivered
          -     FOB  4445  Marion  Street,  Marianna,  FL  32448

TOTAL  PRICE:  $65,900.00
TERMS:  50%  down  payment  upon  receipt  of  purchase  order; balance due upon
delivery  and  training.



Sincerely,
                                      /s/ Robby Brown
                                     -----------------------------------------
Chris  Smith                         Chief  Robby  Brown                  Date
VP  Sales  &  Marketing              Jackson  County  Fire  Rescue
Xtreme  Companies,  Inc.
#### John Koeppel, Appellant, v Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[66 NYS3d 121]

Order, Supreme Court', New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered on or about February 24, 2017, which denied plaintiffs motion for leave to renew defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This Court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint for failure to allege facts from which it could be inferred that defendants participated in plaintiff’s business partners’ alleged scheme to defraud plaintiff out of his ownership of a Volkswagen dealership (128 AD3d 441 [1st Dept 2015]). Thereafter, this Court affirmed denial of plaintiffs first motion for renewal (145 AD3d 436 [1st Dept 2016]). Plaintiff again seeks renewal, this time on the basis of emails between his former business partners and an employee of defendants, claiming they are proof that defendants were part of the scheme.

Plaintiff again has failed to provide reasonable justification for his failure to present the new evidence on defendants’ motion (CPLR 2221 [e] [3]). Further, the new facts, even if considered, do not change the original determination (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]). The emails contain no facts establishing that defendants knew of the alleged fraud.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15640]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATE: Weeks of June 8, 15, 22, and 29, 1998.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS OF BE CONSIDERED:

Week of June 8

Thursday, June 11
11:30 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)

Week of June 15--Tentative

Wednesday, June 17
10:00 a.m.  Briefing by National Mining Association on Regulation of 
the Uranium Recovery Industry (Public Meeting)
11:30 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)
2:00 p.m.  Meeting with Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of Isotopes 
(ACMUI) and Briefing on Part 35 OM Rule (Public Meeting) (Contact: 
Larry Camper, 301-415-7231)

Week of June 22--Tentative

Thursday, June 25
9:30 a.m.  Briefing by IG on Results of NRC Organization Safety Culture 
and Climate Survey (Public Meeting)
11:30 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)
2:00 p.m.  Briefing on EEO Program (Public Meeting)

Week of June 29--Tentative

Tuesday, June 30
10:00 a.m.  Meeting with Commonwealth Edison (Public Meeting) (Contact: 
Bob Capra, 301-415-1430)
11:30 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)
2:00 p.m.  Briefing on Performance Assessment Progress in HLW, LLW, and 
SDMP (Public Meeting)
    The schedule for commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice to verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292. Contact person for more information. Bill Hill (301) 415-1661.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers: 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1661). In addition, distribution of 
this meeting notice over the Internet system is available. If you are 
interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule 
electronically, please send an electronic message to [email protected] or 
[email protected].
* * * * *
    Dated: June 5, 1998.
William M. Hill, Jr.,
SECY Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15640 Filed 6-8-98; 3:59 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
```
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip Kotze, Chief Executive Officer of Anooraq
Resources Corporation (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:  | July 13, 2008                  | 
|------ | ------------------------------ | 
|       |                                | 
|       |                                | 
|       | /s/ Philip Kotze               | 
|By:    | Philip Kotze                   | 
|Title: | Acting Chief Executive Officer | 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-381-CV

IN RE LEE CORNELIUS	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay are denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL  A: GARDNER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED:  November 2, 2007
# Employee Spotlight: Clinton Jones 

/ Published Aug. 14, 2020
RICHMOND, Va., 
Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs. For more information, call (804) 279-3139.

**Name**: Clinton Jones

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Cherry Point, NC

**Years of Service:** 15 Years

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?**

I am a Customer Support Technician. As such, I perform customer support operations including processing of customer orders, backorder management, providing customers with order status updates, and performing expedited and follow-up actions, as well as research alternative sources.

**What do you like most about your job?**

What I like most about my job is my amazing coworkers, but most of all, I really enjoy the privilege of being able to provide support to our warfighters.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction?  Why?**

The aspect of my job that gives me the most personal satisfaction is finding surplus, filling orders and solving issues. At the end of the day, I know I’ve helped put together a piece of the big picture by getting some type of weapons system back to the fleet or in the air.

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?**

If I could speak directly to the warfighters we support, I would tell them thank you! You’ve chosen to do something great to support/protect the greatest country on earth. For that I am thankful to have the opportunity to support you!

**What are some of your passions outside of work?**

Some of my passions outside of work are helping others and being active in my community, but most of all spending time with my family. My wife and four children are definitely my top priority.

**What’s the most thrilling/adventurous thing you have ever done?**

I would have to say the most thrilling/adventurous thing I’ve ever done was earning the title of US Marine!

**What is your favorite military aircraft?  Why?**

It’s so hard to choose a favorite aircraft when you enjoy aviation as much as I do. However, if I had to choose one, it would probably be the KC-10. The ability to transport freight and provide in-flight fuel to other aircraft while on missions is pretty impressive.

**What is your proudest accomplishment?**

My proudest accomplishment would have to be becoming a father! I love and care for my family very much. They are my true drive and they are my world!
# Bond retires after 37 years

/ Published Aug. 11, 2021
JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR HICKAM, Hawaii , 
Navy CAPT Jason Adams, Commander, Defense Logistics Agency Indo-Pacific, recognized Craig Bond, DLA Indo-Pacific Warfighter Support Representative for the Alaska Interior at Fairbanks Alaska, for his 37-plus years of distinguish government service, of which 11-plus years were with DLA.  The retirement ceremony took place via a virtual environment from Joint Base Pearl Harbor Hickam, Hawaii to Fort Wainright, Alaska on July 28, 2021.

Bond was applauded for integrating and building strong partnerships across the enterprise, while improving customer relations and enhancing overall warfighter readiness.  He was instrumental in delivering world-class logistics support to over 22,000 military personnel in Alaska who are charged with maintaining regional air sovereignty, deploying forces for worldwide contingencies, and providing support to federal and state authorities during civil emergencies.

Reflecting on his career, Bond stated “my success in Alaska could not have taken place without the direct support I received from my leadership, my DLA colleague Bob Sherrill, and supporting DLA staff along with the support from my wife.  I will surely miss everyone.”

Bond and his wife, Laura, departs Fairbanks, Alaska to settle in Montrose, Colorado.  His future plans are to do something different and to remain closer to his aging parents, while being more accessible to other family members.
No. 09-11291.

#### Terry E. Sears, Petitioner v. Walter A. McNeil, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 872, 131 S. Ct. 173,

178 L. Ed. 2d 104,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6803,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, denied.

Same case below, 25 So. 3d 1244.
# Spring forward safely by changing your clocks, batteries during daylight saving time 

/ Published March 9, 2022
Richmond, Va., 
Fire and Emergency Services personnel with Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond are encouraging employees to change batteries in smoke alarms when they change their clocks for daylight saving time March 13.

That’s right, it’s time to change your batteries again. The Change Your Clock Change Your Battery Campaign, which is semi-annual, serves as a reminder to change out batteries in alarms (smoke, carbon monoxide, etc.) Also, it can serve as a reminder to not just to check the batteries in your alarms, but every piece of equipment you may rely on in an emergency that uses batteries – including emergency radios and  flashlights.

According to some statistics shared by the National Fire Protection Association:
      - Three out of five home fire deaths result from fires in properties with smoke detectors present but not working.
      - More than 38% of home fire deaths result from fires in which no smoke alarms are present.
      - The risk of dying in a home fire is cut in half in homes with working smoke alarms.

The U.S. Fire Administration provides answers to these common questions:
      - When should I replace my smoke alarms? If your smoke alarms are 10 years old or older, replace them with new alarms.
      - What types of smoke alarms should I buy? This is a not an easy question to answer due to not all fires being the same. However, they fall under two basic types: ionization and photoelectric. There are also dual sensor smoke alarms, which contain both ionization and photoelectric smoke sensors. Also, choose interconnected smoke alarms, so when one sounds, they all sound.

If a smoke alarm sounds while you're cooking or taking a shower with lots of steam, do not remove the battery. You should open a window or door and press the “hush” button, wave a towel at the alarm to clear the air and move the entire alarm several feet away from the kitchen or bathroom.

Disabling a smoke alarm or removing the battery can be a deadly mistake.
# L_2010112EN.01000601.xml

| 5.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/6

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 381/2010

of 4 May 2010

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 May 2010.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 May 2010.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | JO | 68,6 |
| MA | 75,0 |
| TN | 121,9 |
| TR | 85,4 |
| ZZ | 87,7 |
| 0707 00 05 | MA | 64,9 |
| MK | 64,0 |
| TR | 122,1 |
| ZZ | 83,7 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 89,0 |
| ZZ | 89,0 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 40,9 |
| IL | 59,0 |
| MA | 46,9 |
| TN | 47,4 |
| TR | 55,5 |
| ZZ | 49,9 |
| 0805 50 10 | TR | 70,5 |
| ZA | 71,6 |
| ZZ | 71,1 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 87,9 |
| BR | 74,6 |
| CL | 80,4 |
| CN | 75,4 |
| MK | 22,1 |
| NZ | 121,7 |
| US | 124,1 |
| UY | 82,7 |
| ZA | 86,8 |
| ZZ | 84,0 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

JO

68,6

MA

75,0

TN

121,9

TR

85,4

ZZ

87,7

0707 00 05

MA

64,9

MK

64,0

TR

122,1

ZZ

83,7

0709 90 70

TR

89,0

ZZ

89,0

0805 10 20

EG

40,9

IL

59,0

MA

46,9

TN

47,4

TR

55,5

ZZ

49,9

0805 50 10

TR

70,5

ZA

71,6

ZZ

71,1

0808 10 80

AR

87,9

BR

74,6

CL

80,4

CN

75,4

MK

22,1

NZ

121,7

US

124,1

UY

82,7

ZA

86,8

ZZ

84,0

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
#### David Molner, Respondent, v Naomi Molner, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 849]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael L. Katz, J.), entered August 17, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied defendant wife’s motion for a judgment on the husband’s spousal maintenance and child support arrears, and referred the matter to a special referee for a hearing on whether there had been a sufficient change of circumstances to warrant modification, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s order was not dispositive on the relevant issues, but referred the matter for a hearing before a special referee. Thus, the husband was not required, as the wife suggests, to establish “extreme financial hardship” to warrant a hearing, *655but to raise a "genuine question of fact” that this might be the case *(Gordon v Gordon,*82 AD3d 509 [1st Dept 2011]; *Sonkin v Sonkin,*137 AD3d 635, 636 [1st Dept 2016]). Given the husband’s explanation in the motions below about the massive and complex litigation surrounding his entities, the involuntary bankruptcy of his fund and the massive debts he faced, the court properly determined that there was at least a genu-iné issue of fact as to whether he was under extreme hardship and unable to sustain the hefty amounts owing under the parties’ agreement going forward *(id.).*

We have considered the wife’s remaining contentions, and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P, Renwick, Andrias and Kahn, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


         THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION IS PROVIDED BY THE UNDERSIGNED CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CLARK/BARDES, INC. ON THE BASIS OF SUCH OFFICER'S KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clark/Bardes, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2003 (the "Report"), I, W.T.
Wamberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ W.T. Wamberg
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:    W.T. Wamberg
                                       Title:   President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                       Date: May 15, 2003



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### 34-35th Corp., Appellant, v 1-10 Industry Associates, LLC, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 644]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a lease, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated July 16, 2002, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the third cause of action alleging fraud as a sanction for its spoliation of evidence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs spoliation of the tape recordings of its meeting with the defendant’s representatives did not warrant dismissal of the plaintiffs third cause of action in its entirety. The third cause of action, as pleaded, alleges both oral and written misrepresentations, and the defendant is not left “prejudicially bereft” to defend itself against the alleged written misrepresentations by loss of the proof of the alleged oral misrepresentations *(see Chiu Ping Chung v Caravan Coach Co.,*285 AD2d 621 [2001]). Dismissal of only that part of the third cause of action which is based upon alleged oral misrepresentations was warranted as a spoliation sanction *(see Foncette v LA Express,*295 AD2d 471, 472 [2002]).

The dismissal of the remainder of the third cause of action is justified, however, because of its legal insufficiency. Although this argument was not raised in the Supreme Court, this insuf*712ficiency involves a question of law that appears on the face of the record *(see Schuler v Kings Plaza Shopping Ctr. & Mar.,*294 AD2d 556, 558 [2002]; *Weiner v MKVII-Westchester,*292 AD2d 597, 598 [2002]; *Matter of Adam S.,*285 AD2d 175, 177 [2001]).

A fraud cause of action may not be maintained when the only fraud charged relates to the breach of contract *(see Page v Muze, Inc.,*270 AD2d 401 [2000]; *Germain v Staten Is. Boat Sales,*248 AD2d 507 [1998]; *Alamo Contr. Bldrs. v CTF Hotel Co.,*242 AD2d 643, 644 [1997]). Here, the fraud claim arises out of the identical facts and circumstances, and even contains the same allegations, as the cause of action alleging breach of contract *(see Morgan v Smith Corp.,*265 AD2d 536 [1999]; *Purnavel v Tel-A-Car of N.Y.,*204 AD2d 297 [1994]; *Guerrero v Valiando,*197 AD2d 667 [1993]). Moreover, the plaintiff has not claimed that the fraud arises from representations that are collateral or extraneous to the parties’ contract *(see Gupta Realty Corp. v Gross,*251 AD2d 544, 545 [1998]; *Alamo Contr. Bldrs. v CTF Hotel Co., supra).*Finally, there are no damages that would not be recoverable under the contract measure of damages, and therefore, the fraud cause of action is simply redundant *(see Tuck Indus. v Reichhold Chems.,*151 AD2d 565, 566 [1989]). Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of the third cause of action in its entirety, albeit, in part, on a different ground. S. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.