alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Employee Spotlight: Antwine Ray

/ Published June 22, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
*Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs.*

**Name:** Antwine Ray

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City

**Years of service:** 15 years

**What is your job title and what do you do specifically?**I work in a warehouse as a material expediter where I research the material for correctness, quantity, and destination before I ship it out to the other warehouses and shops. I also support the inventory management specialists by providing them information pertaining to briefings and buy packages.

**What do you like most about your job and why?** My job contributes significantly to bringing the warfighter home safely. Having this responsibility is something really important to me and truly makes me feel like I matter in this world, especially to the warfighter.

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?** I would tell the warfighter, “Thank you, and may God be with you and your family.”

**What do you see as your biggest challenge right now?** Motivating some of the new employees that get easily distracted can be a challenge. It is important to get them focused on making good choices that will produce the right outcomes.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?** I love to hike up mountains and walk trails because it clears my mind and connects me to nature. The best part is the happiness I feel when I make it to the top of a mountain, and the satisfaction that follows when I make it back down to my car. My goal this year is to run to the top of Mount Scott, an elevation of over 2,400 feet located in the Wichita Mountain range of Oklahoma.

**If you could pick a personal motto, what would it be and why?** My motto would be that if you’re looking for the person who will change your life, look in the mirror. Life will teach you that all you need is to believe in yourself.

**Have you ever been a mentor to a co-worker or other employee?****If so, how did you help them grow?** I have been able to mentor a few coworkers by showing them respect and open-mindedness, while I had to impart on others the importance of choosing their battles wisely and to let negative things go.

My own mentor is Richard Schwing, deputy commander of DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City. Quite some time ago, he took a moment to say “Hi” to me and asked me how I was doing. His sincere interest in my response made me realize how significant we all are at our jobs in DLA, no matter what our grade or position is.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2415

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 relating to the treatment

of partnership investment expenses under the alternative minimum tax.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 23 (legislative day, AUGUST 18), 1994

Mr. DODD (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. BUMPERS, Mr. BOREN, and Mrs.

BOXER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 relating to

the treatment of partnership investment expenses under

the alternative minimum tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF PARTNERSHIP INVESTMENT

4 EXPENSES UNDER MINIMUM TAX.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Subparagraph (A) of section

6 56(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

7 to limitation on deductions) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(A) DISALLOWANCE OF CERTAIN DEDUC9 TIONS.—
2

•S 2415 IS

1 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—No deduction shall

2 be allowed—

3 ‘‘(I) for any miscellaneous item4 ized deduction (as defined in section

5 67(b)), or

6 ‘‘(II) for any taxes described in

7 paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of section

8 164(a).

9 ‘‘(ii) TREATMENT OF PARTNERSHIP

10 INVESTMENT EXPENSES.—Subclause (I) of

11 clause (i) shall not apply to the taxpayer’s

12 distributive share of the expenses described

13 in section 212 of any partnership; except

14 that the aggregate amount allowed as a de15 duction by reason of this sentence shall not

16 exceed the lesser of (I) the aggregate ad17 justed investment income of the taxpayer

18 from partnerships, or (II) the excess of the

19 aggregate of the taxpayer’s distributive

20 shares of such expenses over 2 percent of

21 adjusted gross income. For purposes of the

22 preceding sentence, the term ‘adjusted in23 vestment income’ means investment income

24 (as defined in section 163(d)(4)(B) without

25 regard to subclause (II) of clause (ii) or
3

•S 2415 IS

1 clause (iii)) reduced by investment interest

2 (as defined in section 163(d)(3)).

3 ‘‘(iii) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN

4 TAXES.—Subclause (II) of clause (i) shall

5 not apply to any amount allowable in com6 puting adjusted gross income.’’

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

9 December 31, 1993.

Æ
*April 6, 2017*

2017-Ohio-1274.]

2017-0010.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Rutherford.

Sua sponte, Guy Darius Rutherford, Attorney Registration No. 0066032, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio, found in contempt for failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before March 3, 2017.
# Agency's customer service team working to standardize metrics, improve user experience

/ Published Dec. 4, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
More than 50 customer-facing employees from across the Defense Logistics Agency met in person and online for a three-day Customer Service Management Summit in November. The attendees included customer account specialists from the six major subordinate commands, business program analysts, site integrators, division chiefs and DLA Customer Interaction Center representatives. 

The group focused on developing policy for customer case management and associated customer relationship management metrics.

                231130-D-D0441-1003                            Participants at the Defense Logistics Agency’s Customer Service Management Summit share their best practices and ideas on improving and standardizing the management of customer cases in November 2023. Courtesy photo            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Courtesy photoVIRIN: 231130-D-D0441-1003Sly Ahn, director of customer support for DLA Logistics Operations, kicked off the meeting by reviewing the CRM team’s vision of providing customers and agents with best-in-business experiences.

Employees shared their best practices and ideas for improving and standardizing case management. The agency’s customer-facing team refers to phone, email and web interactions with customers as cases, which are tracked through the CSM application.

Coming up with standardized metrics is a tough task, said John Sarnosky, a CRM management and program analyst.

“Because each MSC manages customer cases differently, it will be difficult to develop standardized metrics that are fair yet challenging for all. Despite this, we were able to agree on a data-supported baseline metric that will be discussed at future leadership forums for concurrence,” he said.

While CIC agents and customer account specialists regularly use CSM, the goal is to increase the number of CSM users and improve the quality of information and overall efficiency of customer services. 

“Although we only had representation from a couple from the MSC supplier operations directorates, they seemed very willing to use ServiceNow to manage post award requests and see how it can help reduce their workload while improving customer service,” Sarnosky added.

Marianne Lumsden, CSM product owner, also presented a timeline for new CSM capabilities in ServiceNow that will be rolled out incrementally in 2024. The new tools are expected to modernize and improve customers’ experience and include: Virtual Agent, Live Chat, Engagement Messenger and a Self-Help Customer Portal.

The next summit is being planned for late-January 2024.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 5, 2019

s0522

Order 

Clerk

June 5, 2019

158983

JEREMY HOOKER,

Appellee,

v SC: 158983

COA: 343334

BRENDA M. MOORE,

Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 10-5283.

#### Alexander Wallace, Petitioner v. Florida Parole Commission.

562 U.S. 913, 131 S. Ct. 270,

178 L. Ed. 2d 178,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6949.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit No. 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of DRS Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of DRS Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|/s/RICHARD A. SCHNEIDERRichard A. Schneider
Chief Financial Officer
June 11, 2004 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY DRS
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

---



QuickLinks
# One-time sale benefits DLA, Portuguese

/ Published Feb. 11, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Nearly a thousand pieces of usable furniture were recently awarded to the Portuguese government as part of a one-time sale held at Lajes Field in the Azores archipelago in the mid-Atlantic.

The U.S. has based personnel at Lajes Field since WWII, as a waystation for anti-submarine aircraft and a refueling point for military cargo planes bound for the U.S., Africa, and Europe. 

Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services has long maintained a field office at Lajes, supporting the property turn-in needs of various Air Force and Navy units headquartered there. Property Disposal Specialist Luciano Barbosa De Lima is DLA’s site lead and a 25-year DLA veteran who hails from the island chain. He said the last major property sales DLA conducted in the Azores occurred in 2015, when a hospital and family housing closed as the base was drawing down.

“The base used to be really big,” Lima said, noting that of the thousands of U.S. troops previously stationed there, a relative handful are still there. Of the 2,000 local nationals he estimated were once employed by the base, he said 417 remained. “DLA made big donations to the Humanitarian Assistance Program in 2015, and an entire hospital full of equipment – X-ray machines, dental chairs and equipment – went to a Portuguese air base in Lisbon.”

The recent sale included bedroom and office furniture – chairs, desks, wall units, chests, dressers, beds, and tables – left over from the drawdown. At first, Lima said, no one wanted to buy a giant furniture lot located in a dramatically remote place. He said that without a taker, the agency would need to downgrade the furniture condition codes and it would have cost DOD tens of thousands of dollars to collect, transport and incinerate the items.

Then came a stroke of luck.

“I am so happy,” Lima said. “A new Portuguese base commander arrived, examined the property lot and said, ‘whoa, this is better than what we have in our housing. We probably can’t use everything, but we can use a lot of it.’”

Lima said the Portuguese Air Force made an offer to the DLA contracting officer that was accepted and then personnel quickly got to work clearing out spaces.

“It was great. We saved quite a bit of money. They took everything, they cleaned out our buildings,” Lima said. “They came in and used their trucks, their people, they loaded everything, they did the whole job.”

He said he expects a future sale of remaining furniture from a couple of buildings currently being used as quarantine quarters for servicemembers traveling to and from the U.S. who need lodging facilities while they wait for mandatory COVID-19 testing periods to elapse.

The official name of Lajes Field is Airbase No. 4. It was a primary location from which U.S. forces hunted German U-boats in WWII, and later, where Atlantic search-and-rescue missions often originated from.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Morgans Foods, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provided reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of August 17, 2008, based on such evaluation; andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during registrants second fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: October 1, 2008
    /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. HignettSenior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary
## M13003 Molecular Weight Analysis Page 1 of 3



## CONFIDENTAIL INFORMATION REMOVED

## M13003 Molecular Weight Analysis Page 2 of 3



## CONFIDENTAIL INFORMATION REMOVED

## M13003 Molecular Weight Analysis Page 3 of 3



## CONFIDENTAIL INFORMATION REMOVED
(March 15, 2017)

#### Donna Walker et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[50 NYS3d 320]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (James E. d’Auguste, J.), entered March 18, 2016, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment dismissing the false arrest and false imprisonment claims. Defendants submitted competent proof that plaintiffs were in constructive possession of the drugs and weapon recovered from the balcony in the apartment in which plaintiffs Donna Walker and Kendra Esannason were registered as tenants, and that the police had probable cause to arrest all three plaintiffs *(see Boyd v City of New York,*143 AD3d 609, 609-610 [1st Dept 2016]; *see generally People v Manini,*79 *470NY2d 561, 573 [1992]). Plaintiffs’ general denials of knowledge of the contraband at the apartment failed to raise a triable issue of fact. In addition, the evidence showed that plaintiff Jasminlee Mejia was more than just merely present at the apartment when the police arrived, as she was in a relationship with Ms. Esannason, frequently slept in the apartment, kept her clothes there, and was in a state of undress or semi-dress when the police arrived *(see People v Edwards,*206 AD2d 597, 597-598 [3d Dept 1994], *lv denied*84 NY2d 907 [1994]).

The motion court correctly dismissed the excessive force claims, since the plaintiffs offered no competent proof to show that the alleged excessive actions by the police were unreasonable given the circumstances, or caused plaintiffs compensable injury *(see Koeiman v City of New York,*36 AD3d 451, 453 [1st Dept 2007], *lv denied*8 NY3d 814 [2007]; *Rivera v City of New York,*40 AD3d 334, 341-342 [1st Dept 2007], *lv dismissed*16 NY3d 782 [2011]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Gesmer, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 118 (Friday, June 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16343]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties can 
review or obtain copies of agreements at the Washington, DC offices of 
the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., Room 962. Interested 
parties may submit comments on an agreement to the Secretary, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, by June 29, 1998.
    Agreement No.: 203-011321-006.
    Title: Maersk/Sea-Land/U.S./Far East & Middle East Agreement.
    Parties:

    A.P. Moller-Maersk Line
    Sea-Land Service, Inc.

    Synopsis: The proposed amendment would permit the parties to 
increase the maximum number of vessels authorized under the Agreement 
to 65 vessels, each with a maximum capacity of 7,000 TEUs.

    Agreement No.: 203-011448-001.
    Title: U.S./Latin America Agreement.
    Parties:

    A.P. Moller-Maersk Line
    Sea-Land Service, Inc.

    Synopsis: The proposed amendment would permit the parties to 
increase the maximum number of vessels authorized under the Agreement 
to 50 vessels, each with a maximum capacity of 4,100 TEUs. It would 
also modify the Agreement's geographic scope to delete Jamaica and add 
the Bahamas.

    Agreement No.: 203-011541-001.
    Title: Maersk/Sea-Land Mediterranean Agreement.
    Parties:

    A.P. Moller-Maersk Line
    Sea-Land Service, Inc.

    Synopsis: The proposed amendment would permit the parties to 
increase the maximum number of vessels authorized under the Agreement 
to 30 vessels, each with a maximum capacity of 7,000 TEUs.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: June 16, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-16343 Filed 6-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
# DLA Energy powers NASA Orion spacecraft 

/ Published Dec. 10, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
After its historic 25-day, 1.4-million-mile journey that ventured beyond the Moon, NASA’s Orion returned to Earth on Dec. 11.

To power its journey, Defense Logistics Agency Energy supplied the uncrewed Orion capsule with 438 pounds of high purity hydrazine, 6,245 pounds of Monomethyl Hydrazine and 10,670 pounds of Nitrogen Tetroxide Mon-3 grade propellants. 

The hypergolic propellants, like gasoline for a car, helps the spacecraft “drive,” change direction and slow its decent.

“The high purity hydrazine powers the 12 reaction control thrusters to control and properly orient the Orion crew module during its re-entry to Earth,” said Steve Nichols, DLA Energy Aerospace Energy Customer Operations division chief. “The other propellants are used for the Orion service module powering the main engine, eight auxiliary engines and 24 thrusters.”

Orion launched on NASA’s new heavy-lift rocket, the Space Launch System, Nov. 16. It separated from the rocket after reaching space and began its journey circumnavigating the moon.

While this mission was uncrewed, NASA’s Orion spacecraft is built to serve as an exploration vehicle that will carry the crew to space, provide emergency abort capability, sustain their missions, and provide safe re-entry from deep space return velocities. 

The mission, called Artemis I, is the first in a series of increasingly complex missions that will enable human exploration to the Moon and Mars. 

“Aerospace Energy teams are proud to be part of this new chapter in our nation’s human deep space missions,” Nichols said. “Perhaps DLA Energy will have a DFSP [defense fuel support point] in space one day.”

Throughout 2022, DLA Energy Aerospace Energy supported 19 Defense Department and NASA space vehicles launches with hypergolic propellants. Among these include four missions for the National Reconnaissance Office, three missions for the U.S. Space Force and 11 NASA missions including the James Webb Space Telescope.