alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15643]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Determination of Quarterly Rate of Excise Tax for Railroad 
Retirement Supplemental Annuity Program

    In accordance with directions in Section 3221(c) of the Railroad 
Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C., Section 3221(c)), the Railroad 
Retirement Board has determined that the excise tax imposed by such 
Section 3221(c) on every employer, with respect to having individuals 
in his employ, for each work-hour for which compensation is paid by 
such employer for services rendered to him during the quarter beginning 
July 1, 1998, shall be at the rate of 35 cents.
    In accordance with directions in Section 15(a) of the Railroad 
Retirement Act of 1974, the Railroad Retirement Board has determined 
that for the quarter beginning July 1, 1998, 29.7 percent of the taxes 
collected under Sections 3211(b) and 3221(c) of the Railroad Retirement 
Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad Retirement Account and 70.3 
percent of the taxes collected under such Sections 3211(b) and 3221(c) 
plus 100 percent of the taxes collected under Section 3221(d) of the 
Railroad Retirement Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad 
Retirement Supplemental Account.

    Dated: June 2, 1998.

    By authority of the Board.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15643 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-11-M
# Employee Spotlight: Morgan Smith

/ Published Feb. 13, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
Name: Morgan Smith

Organization: DLA Aviation's Supplier Operations Commodities Directorate's Post-Award Division

Years of Service: 2 years

What is your job title and what do you do specifically? I’m a post award contract specialist. I work to resolve post-award requests on contracts involving life support/critical safety items. I am responsible for everything that happens to a contract after it has been awarded i.e., issuing modifications, monitoring performance and managing changes etc. 

What do like most about your job and why? What I love most about my job is that every day I face a new challenge. Each request I receive is a little bit different and requires unique research and collaboration to find a resolution. I have a wonderful leadership team as well as knowledgeable peers I can lean on to talk through difficult issues and brainstorm solutions with. I also love the culture and team atmosphere here at DLA. My team is a big reason why I look forward to going to work every day. We all work together to support the warfighter and manage to have some fun along the way!

If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them? I would tell them I do my job everyday with you in mind. With a husband in the military, I know how important it is for you to receive quality material on time. For this reason, I work tirelessly to make sure this happens. If you receive parachutes, harnesses, or any other critical safety/ life support items administered by DLA Richmond, rest assured, it has been well tested and SAFE!

Professionally, where do you see yourself five years from now? In five years, I see myself here at DLA. I want to continue growing and learning through additional certifications so that I can become more versatile in the contracting field. I will gain more experience so that I can pass along my knowledge just as so many DLA team members have done for me. I would really like to be in a position where I can make a broad impact on the organization and help the warfighter in a larger capacity.

What are some of your passions outside of work? My husband and I have a four month old daughter and a four year old golden retriever that keeps us busy! We are always on the go and like spending time in the outdoors. Recently, our outdoor adventures have been confined to hanging out in the backyard, but we are enjoying every second with our new buddle of joy!
#### In the Matter of Andrea L.P. and Others, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Cassandra M.P., Appellant; Cardinal McCloskey Community Services, Respondent.

[64 NYS3d 527]

Orders, Family Court, New York County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about October 13, 2016, which, upon a find*414ing of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to the subject children and committed custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This Court previously determined that the agency met its burden of establishing permanent neglect (140 AD3d 477 [1st Dept 2016]). On remittitur, the Family Court properly determined that a preponderance of the evidence established that termination of the mother’s parental rights was in the children’s best interests *(see Matter of Star Leslie*W., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148 [1984]).

A suspended judgment was not warranted under the circumstances, because there was no evidence that respondent had a realistic and feasible plan to provide an adequate and stable home for the children, all of whom have special needs *(see Matter of Charles Jahmel M. [Charles E.M.],*124 AD3d 496 [1st Dept 2015], *lv denied*25 NY3d 905 [2015]; *Matter of Jesus Michael P. [Sonia*R.], 122 AD3d 520 [1st Dept 2014]). There is also no evidence that further delay will result in a different outcome, and the children, having been in foster care since 2012, deserve permanency after this extended period of uncertainty *(see Matter of Selvin Adolph F. [Thelma Lynn W.],*146 AD3d 418 [1st Dept 2017]; *Matter of Autumn P. [Alisa R.],*129 AD3d 519 [1st Dept 2015]). Furthermore, it is noted that the evidence at the hearing showed that respondent will be able to continue to see the children after the adoption *(Selvin Adolph F.*at 419).

Concur—Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
# Land and Maritime claims top communicator at annual awards

/ Published March 17, 2023
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Logistics Agency recognized DLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs Specialist Stefanie Hauck as Communicator of the Year during the 2022 DLA Journalism Award competition. The competition is held annually and showcases DLA’s most effective journalism contributions to the DLA mission.

Congratulations to Stefanie for being recognized as a leader among her professional peers,” said DLA Land and Maritime Commander Army Brig. Gen. Gail Atkins. “Her skills as a top communicator help build awareness and showcase Land and Maritime mission successes.”

Hauck performs the full complement of her public affairs skillset in support of a robust Land and Maritime Command Information Program that distributes information products focusing on command initiatives, policies and special programs to keep Land and Maritime associates informed.

During 2022, Hauck showcased her talents in writing and multimedia to craft content profiling Land and Maritime associates through the human-interest lens and bringing agency-wide awareness to Defense Supply Center Columbus initiatives. In addition to garnering DLA’s Communicator of the Year, Hauck also earned 3rd place in the Civilian Writer of the Year portion of the competition.

DLA Energy Public Affairs Specialist Connie Braesch and DLA Headquarters Public Affairs Specialist Nancy Benecki took 1st and 2nd place, respectively, in the Civilian Writer of the Year category. DLA Disposition Services Public Affairs Specialist Jason Shamberger netted 2nd place Communicator of the Year honors.

As a 1st place finisher, Hauck will move forward to represent DLA in the Defense Media Awards, a Department of Defense competition that pits the top journalists from defense agencies and military services throughout DOD.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 31879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15680]


      

[[Page 31877]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part VI





The President





_______________________________________________________________________



Presidential Determination No. 98-24 of May 29, 1998--Determination 
Pursuant to Section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act 
of 1962, as Amended



Presidential Determination No. 98-25 of May 30, 1998--Sanctions Against 
Pakistan for Detonation of a Nuclear Explosive Device


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 111 / Wednesday, June 10, 1998 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 31879]]

                Presidential Determination No. 98-24 of May 29, 1998

                
Determination Pursuant to Section 2(c)(1) of the 
                Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, as 
                Amended

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and 
                Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 
                2601(c)(1), I hereby determine that it is important to 
                the national interest that up to $37,000,000 be made 
                available from the United States Emergency Refugee and 
                Migration Assistance Fund to meet the urgent and 
                unexpected needs of refugees, victims of conflict, and 
                other persons at risk in Africa and Southeast Asia. 
                These funds may be used, as appropriate, to provide 
                contributions to international and nongovernmental 
                agencies.

                You are authorized and directed to inform the 
                appropriate committees of the Congress of this 
                determination and the obligation of funds under this 
                authority and to publish this memorandum in the Federal 
                Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 29, 1998.

[FR Doc. 98-15680
Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-M
Mark Hague 

/\cting Regional Administrator 

EPA Region VII 

I 120 i Renner Boulevard 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219 

RE: Iowa-Nebraska Light and Power Company Fonner Manufactured Gas 

Plant (FMGP) Site, Norfolk, NE 

NDEQ ID: 77312 

Program ID: SF, NED986373678 

Subject: Proposed NPL Listing 

Dear Mr. I [ague: 

This is in response to your March 23, 2015 request for a written statement of my position 

pe11aining to the proposed listing of the former Iowa-Nebraska Light and Power Co. FMGP site 

on the Superfund National Priorities List. 

I concur with EPA 's proposal to list the Norfolk site on the National Priorities List. My 

recommendation is based on written comments received from Norfolk Mayor Sue Fuchtman 

who has the full support of the City Council members, in addition to the information that has 

been provided to me by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality and the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency. Based on the available information, the proposed listing is 

the appropriate approach to address this environmental concern. 

This is a significant issue that requires a coordinated and effective response_ l appreciate EPA's 

efforts to seek concurrence from the state and from local officials before making a final decision 

regarding listing this groundwater contamination site. The State of Nebraska will continue to 

provide cooperative support as we move forward in the Superfund remedial action process. 

Thank you for your involvement and EPA 's ongoing efforts to address this situation. 

Sincerely, 

Governor 

An Equal Opportunity Employer
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Bioenvision, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher B. Wood,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




                    /s/ Christopher B. Wood
                    ------------------------------------
                    Christopher B. Wood
                    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                    October 13, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41221

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN SOTO-ROBLES, also known as Johnny,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-281-6

Before DAVIS, JONES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Soto-Robles has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Soto-Robles has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Soto-Robles’s 

response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41221 Document: 00513552819 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2016
No. 15-41221

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-41221 Document: 00513552819 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2016
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice
[OJP (NIJ)-1183]
RIN 1121-ZB20


Announcement of the Availability of the National Institute of 
Justice ``Solicitation for Policing Research and Evaluation: Fiscal 
Year 1998''

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, 
Justice.

ACTION: Notice of Solicitation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Announcement of the availability of the National Institute of 
Justice ``Solicitation for Policing Research and Evaluation: Fiscal 
Year 1998.''

DATES: Due date for receipt of proposals is close of business July 20, 
1998.

ADDRESSES: National Institute of Justice, 810 Seventh Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For a copy of the solicitation, please 
call NCJRS 1-800-851-3420. For general information about application 
procedures for solicitations, please call the U.S. Department of 
Justice Response Center 1-800-421-6770.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority

    This action is authorized under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968, Secs. 201-03, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3721-23 
(1994).

Background

    The National Institute of Justice, in partnership with the Office 
of Community Oriented Policing Services, announces its solicitation for 
a fourth year of research and evaluation on community oriented 
policing. For this solicitation NIJ is particularly interested in 
efforts that build on and consolidate existing research findings 
pertaining to community oriented policing, especially those research 
efforts that seek to advance theory in these areas. Researchers are 
encouraged to look beyond current practices and propose research that 
forges new concepts and theories. Major topic areas of interest 
include: community policing evaluations, community policing 
organizational issues, the police and the community, problem solving 
strategies and tactics for community policing, locally-initiated 
partnerships, the impact of technology on policing, and how crime is 
measured.
    The NIJ/COPS partnership anticipates granting multiple awards 
totaling up to $8 million under this solicitation.
    Interested organizations should call the National Criminal Justice 
Reference Service (NCJRS) at 1-800-851-3420 to obtain a copy of 
``Solicitation for Policing Research and Evaluation: Fiscal Year 1998'' 
(refer to document no. SL000286). For World Wide Web access, connect 
either to either NIJ at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/funding.htm, or 
the NCJRS Justice Information Center at <a href="http://www.ncjrs.org/
fedgrant.htm#nij">http://www.ncjrs.org/
fedgrant.htm#nij</a>.
Jeremy Travis,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 98-15566 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00330-CV

TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellant

V.

JEFFREY D. LERNER, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 141st District Court

of Tarrant County (141-307634-19)

January 9, 2020

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s order. We reverse that portion of the trial court’s 

September 12, 2019 order denying appellant Tarrant County, Texas’s plea to the 

jurisdiction and remand for entry of an order granting the plea and for further 

proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

It is further ordered that all parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal, for 

which let execution issue. 
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
No. 10-90.

#### United Financial Systems, Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Indiana ex rel. Indiana State Bar Association.

562 U.S. 893, 131 S. Ct. 288,

178 L. Ed. 2d 142,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6443.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Indiana denied.

Same case below, 926 N.E.2d 8.
---

---

# Exhibit 15.14

CONSENT

We hereby consent to the reference to
our valuation of Series A Debentures and Series B Debentures of Plaza Centers
N.V. as of December 31 2008 in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging Ltd.
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual
Report in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No.
333-130852 and No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd.

This consent is not to be construed
as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to
be filed with the Annual Report under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.

|/s/
 Tavor Economic
Consultants Ltd.
|--------------------------------------------------

Raanana, Israel 
June25, 2009



---

---
# Official Journal L 101/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 101 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5818 April 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 101

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5818 April 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/608 of 14 April 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 as regards the entries for Ukraine and Israel in the list of third countries, the approval of the control programme of Ukraine for Salmonella in laying hens, the veterinary certification requirements concerning Newcastle disease and processing requirements for egg products (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/609 of 17 April 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 58 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/610 of 15 April 2015 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (EUCAP Sahel Mali/2/2015) | 60 |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/611 of 15 April 2015 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (EUCAP Sahel Niger/1/2015) | 61 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/608 of 14 April 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 as regards the entries for Ukraine and Israel in the list of third countries, the approval of the control programme of Ukraine for Salmonella in laying hens, the veterinary certification requirements concerning Newcastle disease and processing requirements for egg products (
  1
  )

Salmonella

1

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/609 of 17 April 2015 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

58

DECISIONS

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/610 of 15 April 2015 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (EUCAP Sahel Mali/2/2015)

60

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/611 of 15 April 2015 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (EUCAP Sahel Niger/1/2015)

61

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50987 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MIGUEL HERNANDEZ-GALLARDO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-821-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Miguel HernandezGallardo raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.