alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011206EN.01005301.xml

| 11.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 206/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 206/53

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION 2011/500/CFSP

of 10 August 2011

implementing Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP of 28 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 28 February 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 28 February 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

| (2) | In view of the gravity of the situation in Libya, two additional entities should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the gravity of the situation in Libya, two additional entities should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The entities listed in the Annex to this Decision shall be added to the list set out in Annex IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 10 August 2011.

For the Council

The President

M. DOWGIELEWICZ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 53.

1

---

ANNEX

Entities referred to in Article 1

| | Name | Identifying information | Reasons | Date of listing |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | Al-Sharara Oil Services Company
  (a.k.a.: Al Sharara, Al-shahara oil service company, Sharara Oil Service Company, Sharara, Al-Sharara al-Dhahabiya Oil Service Company) | Al-Saqa District, Beside al-Saqa Mosque, Tripoli, Libya |
| Tel: +218 21362 2163 |
| Fax: +218 21362 2161 |

Name

Identifying information

Reasons

Date of listing

1.

Al-Sharara Oil Services Company

(a.k.a.: Al Sharara, Al-shahara oil service company, Sharara Oil Service Company, Sharara, Al-Sharara al-Dhahabiya Oil Service Company)

Al-Saqa District, Beside al-Saqa Mosque, Tripoli, Libya

Tel: +218 21362 2163

Fax: +218 21362 2161

Entity acting on behalf of or at the direction of the Qadhafi Regime.

10.8.2011

2.

Organisation for Development of Administrative Centres (ODAC)

www.odac-libya.com

Entity acting on behalf of or at the direction of the Qadhafi Regime and a potential source of funding for the regime. ODAC has facilitated thousands of government funded infrastructure projects.

10.8.2011

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

Weconsent to the inclusion in this annual report of NovAtel Inc. on Form 20-F andthe incorporation by reference into Registration Statement Nos. 333-98603,333-9216, 333-6502, and 333-6500 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 5, 2003on our audit of the consolidated balance sheet of NovAtel Inc. as at December31, 2002 and the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equityand cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

 
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Deloitte  & Touche LLP     |
| Chartered  Accountants         |
| Calgary,  Canada               |
|                           |
| March 31, 2003                 |

 

----
No. 09-11296.

#### Thomas G. Dean, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

562 U.S. 872, 131 S. Ct. 390,

178 L. Ed. 2d 104,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6968.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
No. 09-11479.

#### Keith Parker, aka Keith Parker-Bey, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 883, 131 S. Ct. 207,

178 L. Ed. 2d 124,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6787.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 31 So. 3d 177.
JERRY D. EZELL
, Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION and WAL

- MART ASSOCIATES, INC.

, Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2985

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 20, 2015.

An appeal from an order from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

Frank E. Brown, Chairman

. Jerry D. Ezell, p ro se , Appellant.

Louis A. Gutierrez, Tallahassee , for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MARSTILLER

, RAY

, and SWANSON

, J J

. , CONCUR.
#### Andrew Zlotnick, Appellant, v New York Yankees Partnership et al., Respondents.

[62 NYS3d 348]

*588Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth González, J.), entered on or about February 1, 2016, dismissing the complaint pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about December 23, 2015, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Plaintiff was injured when, while attending a Yankees baseball game, he was struck in the eye by a foul ball as he was sitting in his assigned seat halfway down the first-base line, a few rows from the field. Defendants did not breach a duty of care, since the evidence shows that appropriate netting was erected behind home plate, and there was no evidence indicating that there was a lack of available seating in such protected area (see *Akins v Glens Falls City School Dist.,*53 NY2d 325, 331 [1981]; *see also Davidoff v Metropolitan Baseball Club,*61 NY2d 996 [1984]).

Plaintiff’s argument that triable issues of fact exist because defendants’ conduct enhanced the risks normally attendant to the game of baseball by allowing the game to be played in intermittent rainy weather, and by not enforcing the stadium’s umbrella policy by ensuring that spectators using umbrellas did not obstruct the ability of other patrons to view the game, is unavailing. Rainy weather and umbrellas are not uncommon to the game of baseball, and plaintiff admittedly used his own umbrella during the course of the game before being struck by the foul ball. The circumstances presented warranted plaintiff heeding the warnings on the back of his ticket, and on the back of the seats, as well as those regularly made over the public address system, to request a change of seating if necessary, and to advise a stadium employee of any particularized concerns a patron may encounter during the course of watching the game.

We have considered and rejected plaintiff’s remaining arguments.

Concur — Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Gesmer and Kern, JJ.
No. 10-5426.

#### Joseph P. Manning, Petitioner v. Bill McCollum, Attorney General of Florida.

562 U.S. 921, 131 S. Ct. 295,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7121.

178 L. Ed. 2d 193,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 933.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2201

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to

make grants for the construction of certain treatment works, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 16 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself and Mr. DOMENICI) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

A BILL

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to make grants for the construction of certain treatment works, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GRANTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN

4 TREATMENT WORKS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Envi6 ronmental Protection Agency shall make 1 or more grants

7 in accordance with title II of the Federal Water Pollution

8 Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.) for the construction
2

•S 2201 IS

1 of publicly owned treatment works in the South Valley of

2 Bernalillo County, New Mexico.

3 (b) FUNDING.—The Administrator is authorized to

4 use $25,000,000 of the funds made available to the Envi5 ronmental Protection Agency under the matter under the

6 heading ‘‘WATER INFRASTRUCTURE/STATE REVOLVING

7 FUNDS’’ under the heading ‘‘ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC8 TION AGENCY’’ in title III of the Departments of Veterans

9 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Inde10 pendent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1994 (Public Law

11 103–124; 107 Stat. 1294), to carry out this section, to

12 remain available until expended.

Æ
*March 17, 2017*

2017-Ohio-952.]

2017-0101.

#### State v. Workman.

Auglaize App. No. 2-16-03. On appellee’s motion to strike motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied as moot.
# Website lets DLA employees schedule Common Access Card, ID appointments online

/ Published Aug. 22, 2022
Fort Belvoir, VA, 
Defense Logistics Agency employees, retirees and family members with a Common Access Card or ID card can schedule appointments and update information online.

The Real-Time Automated Personnel Identification Systems ID Card Office Online lets users perform a variety of tasks for their cards.

“Think of it like the Department of Motor Vehicles when you need to get your driver’s license renewed,” said David Ramos, a physical security specialist with DLA Installation Management’s Security and Emergency Services. “You go online, find an appointment at a location and take care of business. The IDCO website works in the same way.”

The website, managed by the Defense Manpower Data Center, has four sections with buttons to continue for more actions.

The “ID Card Office Locator and Appointments” section allows users to find an ID card office by location, name or site ID. After selecting an office, users can view the address, phone number, services provided, appointment availability and walk-in hours. There’s also a text box at the bottom of the page where the user can provide details about what needs to be done during the appointment.

Card holders can update a work email address on the card, which will also be published in the global access list, in the “Common Access Card” section.

The “Family ID Cards” section allows users to see a list of all ID cards issued to a sponsor, request a renewal of a family ID card and print a list of family members.

The “My Profile” section lets users view a list of ID cards issued to a sponsor. Personal and other work contact information can be updated here as well, but work email addresses must be updated under the Common Access Card section. Other GAL information such as organization and display name can be updated here, and DOD civilians can opt in to the TSA Pre-check program.

“It’s very simple to use,” Ramos said. “It cuts down the time drastically. It’s also a good system because it puts everything under one umbrella.”

A detailed users guide can be found by clicking the help option at the top right-hand side of the page.

Card holders with certificates set to expire are encouraged to make an appointment at least 30 days before the expiration date, Ramos added.

DLA-operated CAC and ID offices are located at Battle Creek, Michigan; Columbus, Ohio; New Cumberland, Pennsylvania; Richmond, Virginia; San Joaquin, California; and Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Offices are located at nearly every installation where DLA operates, however.
2017-0246.

#### Williams v. Minute Men Select, Inc.

Tuscarawas App. Nos. 2016 AP 03 0016 and 2016 AP 04 0020. Appellees’ motion to dismiss and appellant’s motion to consolidate denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.3

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration
statement of Elscint Ltd. on Form S-8 (relating to the registration of shares to
be used under the Elscint Ltd. 2001 Incentive Plan to Employees and Officers and
the Elscint Ltd. 2003 Incentive Plan to Employees and Officers, File Number
333-117519) of our report dated April 6, 2006 relating to the financial
statements of B.E.A. Hotels N.V. for the year ended December 31, 2005, which are
included in Elscint Ltd. Annual Report on Form 20-F filed June 30, 2006.

Amsterdam, June 23, 2006

MAZARS PAARDEKOOPER HOFFMAN N.V.

F.D.N. Walta RA

MAZARS PAARDEKOOPER HOFFMAN N.V.
Mazars Tower, Delflandlaan 1 - P.O. box 7266 - 1007 JG Amsterdam -
amsterdam.audit@mazars.nl
Tel: +31 (0)20-2060500 - Fax: +31 (0)20-6448051

ACCOUNTANTS - Tax advisers - Management consultants

Mazars Paardekooper Hoffman N.V., with its registered office in Rotterdam (Trade
register Rotterdam nr. 24389296).

                                                 Independent Member of (MN LOGO)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131377 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131377 

 COA: 269054 

Kalamazoo CC: 97-000079-FC 

LARRY ROOSEVELT CARTER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
# DLA Document Services preparing customers for NARA’s Dec. 31 deadline for digital records

/ Published Sept. 7, 2022
New Cumberland, Pa., 
Defense Logistics Agency Document Services is making it easier for Defense Department components that submit records to the National Archives and Records Administration to meet a new digital-format requirement by Dec. 31, when physical records will no longer be accepted.

The DLA activity has been working with customers such as the Coast Guard, Joint Pathology Center, Army Corps of Engineers and Defense Technical Information Center to scan and convert paper records since NARA announced the change in 2019. DLA Document Services became the DOD’s manager of printing, scanning and conversion, and office-device procurement services in May 2021.

With an expected influx of scanning and conversion requests, DLA Document Services is dedicating more space to assisting customers with what can be a tedious task. Technicians can scan and digitize documents of any size, from business cards to large-format engineering drawings. They can also scan a wide range of records including medical files, pathology slides, microfilm, and confidential and secret records. Secure destruction of physical records is available after conversion.  

Customers requesting conversion services receive a requirements analysis in which DLA Document Services determines the processing timeline. Factors include document volume and condition, the amount of document preparation required, the level of indexing or metadata needed to retrieve the documents, potential optical recognition services and destruction.

Converting records to digital format has many benefits besides meeting NARA’s requirements. They include:
      - Reduced physical document storage costs,
      - More efficient information sharing,
      - Easier search and retrieval of documents and data due to organizing and indexing with metadata,
      - Protection of critical information,
      - Aids in disaster recovery, and
      - Better records management for audit purposes.

Visit DLA Document Services for more information or contact the Customer Support Center at 1-866-736-7010 or contact.docsvcs@dla.mil.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Casey Townshend Collier , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00059

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 114th District Court of

Smith County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 114

- 1476

- 18 ). Memo randum Opinion delivered by Justice Rambin

, Chief Justice Stevens

and Justice van Cleef participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Casey Townshend Collier , has adequately indicated his

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 29, 2023
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Bernard Aronson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Annual Report of Synplicity, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Synplicity, Inc.



|Date:  March 18, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 



I, Douglas S. Miller,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Synplicity, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Synplicity, Inc.



|Date:  March 18, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |
No. 09-9247.

#### Charles Max Foster, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 842, 131 S. Ct. 67,

178 L. Ed. 2d 48,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5948.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 278.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302 I, Martin C. Clague, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Covansys
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods represented in this annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. /s/ Martin C. ClagueChief Executive Officer and PresidentDate: March 30, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Diamond Lake Drawdown, Umpqua National Forest, Douglas, OR

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Cancellation of an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 2, 1998, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an 
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Diamond Lake Drawdown on 
the Diamond Lake Ranger District of the Umpqua National Forest was 
published in the Federal Register (63 FR 5350). The February 2 NOI is 
being withdrawn because the Forest Service is no longer the lead agency 
for the EIS. The Forest Service NOI is hereby rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this cancellation to Jim Leoni, 
Interdisciplinary Team Leader, Umpqua National Forest, P.O. Box 1008, 
Roseburg, Oregon 97470, phone 541-957-3391.

    Dated: May 18, 1998.
Don Ostby,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 98-14082 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2013-0668; Dir ID 2013-NM-017-AD