alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Deborah Jackson, Appellant.

[57 NYS3d 891]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bogle, J.), rendered October 11, 2016, convicting her of attempted assault in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes review of her contention that the Supreme Court lacked the authority to correct a ministerial error that occurred during the plea proceedings *(see People v Sanders,*25 NY3d 337, 341-342 [2015]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 257 [2006]), as well as her challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution *(see People v Lagarenne,*148 AD3d 826 [2017]; *People v Carle,*121 AD3d 1011 [2014]). Her contentions that the error and its allegedly deficient correction affected the voluntariness of her plea and rendered her sentence illegal are not barred by her valid waiver of her right to appeal *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d at 255). However, these contentions are without merit *(see gen*
      *727
      *erally People v Wright,*56 NY2d 613, 614 [1982]; *People v Rubendall,*4 AD3d 13, 17 [2004]).

Rivera, J.R, Leventhal, Austin and Christopher, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Allen Kohn, Appellant, v Rena Sanders, Respondent.

[55 NYS3d 671]

Appeal by the father from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Denise M. Valme-Lundy, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated May 17, 2016. The order dismissed the father’s petition for modification of an order of custody and visitation.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new determination of the father’s petition.

A referee derives authority from an order of reference by the court *(see*CPLR 4311), which can be made only upon consent of the parties, except in limited circumstances not applicable *598here *(see*CPLR 4317; *Matter of Rivera v Arocho,*120 AD3d 1350, 1351 [2014]; *Matter of McClarin v Valera,*108 AD3d 719 [2013]; *Matter of Stewart v Mosley,*85 AD3d 931, 932 [2011]). Here, the parties did not have an order of reference with respect to this proceeding. Thus, the Court Attorney Referee lacked jurisdiction to issue the order dated May 17, 2016 *(see Matter of Rivera v Arocho,*120 AD3d at 1351; *Matter of Aslan v Senturk,*116 AD3d 952 [2014]; *Matter of Martinborough v Martinborough,*98 AD3d 511 [2012]; *Matter of Gale v Gale,*87 AD3d 1011, 1011 [2011]), and we remit the matter to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new determination of the father’s petition.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the father’s remaining contentions.

Dillon, J.P., Roman, Miller and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 70 (Thursday, April 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 21600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08438]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2013-OS-0050]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a System of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency is deleting a 
system of records notice in its existing inventory of record systems 
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective on May 13, 2013 unless 
comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 
Comments will be accepted on or before May 13, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
    * Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    * Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center 
Drive, East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For privacy questions please contact: 
NGA Privacy Office, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, 7500 
GEOINT Drive, Springfield, VA 22150.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 
552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The 
proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the 
submission of a new or altered system report.

    Dated: April 5, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Deletion:
    B0503-09, Key Accountability Files (67 FR 12532, March 19, 2002).

Reason:
    This system was originally established to maintain documentation on 
periodic inspections, key accountability, reference checks and daily 
use records and investigations into lost or destruction of secure 
areas. The system no longer exists, the records have met their 
retention, and therefore B0503-09, Key Accountability Files can be 
deleted.

[FR Doc. 2013-08438 Filed 4-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2011 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 14, 2011



/s/ Michael R. Feinsod

Michael R. Feinsod

Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14982]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

[TA-W-34, 284]


Munekata America, Incorporated, Dalton, GA; Dismissal of 
Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Acting Director of the Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Munekata America, 
Incorporated, Dalton, Georgia. The review indicated that the 
application contained no new substantial information which would bear 
importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of 
the application was issued.

TA-W-34,284; Munekata America, Incorporated, Dalton, Georgia (May 
21, 1998)

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 21st day of May, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-14982 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
**Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Robert A. SternI, Robert A. Stern, certify that:1. I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Micrus Endovascular Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statement were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(a) and 15d-15(c), forthe registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.          June 15, 2006       By: /s/ Robert A. Stern         Robert A. Stern    Executive Vice President, Chief    Financial Officer and Secretary
No. 10-5857.

#### George Williams, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 939, 131 S. Ct. 352,

178 L. Ed. 2d 228,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7131.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office, denied.

Same case below, 987 A.2d 827.
#### In the Matter of Clarence Gourdine, Appellant, v New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[56 NYS3d 353]

*1492Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia, J.), entered August 18, 2015 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition.

Defendant was convicted of various crimes, including murder in the second degree and sodomy in the first degree (three counts), and is serving an aggregate prison term of 21 years to life *(People v Gourdine,*188 AD2d 741 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 886 [1993]). In May 2013, petitioner appeared before respondent and his request for release to parole supervision was denied. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial of parole in 2015. Shortly thereafter, petitioner reappeared before respondent and, by decision dated May 19, 2015, respondent again denied his request for parole release. Respondent then moved to dismiss the present petition as moot. Supreme Court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss, which petitioner did not oppose. Petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. Petitioner’s reappearance before respondent in May 2015, at which his request for parole was denied, rendered moot his challenge to respondent’s denial of his prior request for parole in May 2013 *(see Matter of Escobar v New York State Bd. of Parole,*145 AD3d 1284, 1285 [2016]; *Matter of Almonte v New York State Div. of Parole,*2 AD3d 1239, 1240 [2003], *appeals dismissed*2 NY3d 758 [2004]). Petitioner now contends that the issues raised in his petition fall within the narrow exception to the mootness doctrine *(see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). However, petitioner did not oppose respondent’s motion to dismiss in Supreme Court, and his claim is not preserved for our review *(see Rosen v Mosby,*148 AD3d 1228, 1233 [2017]).

Peters, P.J., Garry, Rose, Devine and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2103

To make the provisions of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 applicable

to Cambodia.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 11 (legislative day, MAY 2), 1994

Mr. MCCAIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To make the provisions of title IV of the Trade Act of

1974 applicable to Cambodia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO

4 CAMBODIA.

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, title IV

6 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.) shall

7 apply for purposes of determining the eligibility of the

8 products of Cambodia to receive nondiscriminatory (most9 favored-nation) trade treatment.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6349
HARRY JAMES FOWLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FORREST A. FERRELL, Judge; BEVERLY T. BEAL, Superior Court Judge; ROGER HUTCHINS; STEVE REED, Major; LIEUTENANT HARTSO; ANN BECK, Sergeant; CLARA PARSONS, Matron, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-97-4-MU) Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harry James Fowler, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fowler v. Ferrell , No. CA-97-4-MU (W.D.N.C., Feb. 12, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for leave to amend his complaint and dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15986]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,477]


Eastman Kodak Company (CD Disk Worker Group), Rochester, NY; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on April 20, 1998 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on April 8, 1998 on behalf of workers producing rewriteable 
CD disks at Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, New York.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
was issued on May 8, 1998 (TA-W-34,233). Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation resulting from this petition has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 11th day of May, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-15986 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2835]


Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Revocation of Munitions 
Exports Licenses and Other Approvals for Pakistan

agency: Department of State.

action: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: Notice is hereby given that all licenses and other approvals 
to export or otherwise transfer defense articles and defense services 
from the United States to Pakistan, or transfer U.S. origin defense 
articles and defense services from a foreign destination to Pakistan, 
or temporarily import defense articles from Pakistan pursuant to 
Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act are revoked immediately.

effective: May 30, 1998.

for further information contact: Rose Biancaniello, Deputy Director, 
Department of State, Office of Defense Trade Controls, Department of 
State, 703-812-2568.

supplementary information: On May 30, 1998, the President determined 
pursuant to Section 102 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 
2779aa-1) (``the Glenn Amendment'') that Pakistan a non-nuclear weapons 
state, detonated nuclear explosive devices on May 28, 1998, and 
directed the relevant United States Government agencies and 
instrumentalities to take the necessary actions to impose the sanctions 
described in Section 102(b)(2) of that Act. That provision of law 
provides for the termination to Pakistan of sales of defense articles, 
defense services, or design and construction services under the Arms 
Export Control Act, and termination of licenses for the export of any 
item on the United States Munitions List ((USML)). Consistent with such 
law and in furtherance of the foreign policy interests of the United 
States, the Department of State, through publication of this notice, is 
revoking all licenses and other approvals for the permanent and 
temporary export and temporary import of defense articles and defense 
services to or from Pakistan and will deny all applications and other 
requests for approval to export or otherwise transfer or retransfer 
defense articles and defense services to Pakistan. This revocation 
order includes all types of licenses/authorizations; manufacturing, 
technical assistance and distribution agreements; the use of any 
exemption in the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR); any 
authorization to retransfer from a foreign destination. This order also 
extends to the activities and authorizations concerning brokering 
covered by Part 129 of the ITAR.
    Therefore, in accordance with Section 123.21 of the ITAR, licenses 
must be returned immediately to the Department of State, Office of 
Defense Trade Controls.

    Dated: June 10, 1998.
Eric D. Newsom,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-16026 Filed 6-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00237-CV

OLIVER VANS, JR., MICKEY DINH, SANTOS REYNA, AND LO DINH, Appellants

V.

INFINITY COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND SANDRA 

HIGHTOWER, Appellees

Appeal from the 281st District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2009-68816).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on May 1, 

2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible 

error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellants, Oliver Vans, Jr., Mickey Dinh, Santos 

Reyna, and Lo Dinh, jointly and severally, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered May 5, 2015.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd. Opinion delivered 

by Justice Lloyd.
No. 09-11238.

#### Bruce Murray, Petitioner v. David DiGuglielmo, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford.

562 U.S. 869, 131 S. Ct. 166,

178 L. Ed. 2d 98,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6649.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 851.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15434]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[MT-926-08-1420-00]


Montana: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Montana State Office, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plat of survey, in three sheets, of the following 
described land is scheduled to be officially filed in the Montana State 
Office, Billings, Montana, thirty (30) days from the date of this 
publication.

Principal Meridian, Montana

T. 31N., R. 17W.

    The plat, in three sheets, representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the north boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines, 
and a portion of the adjusted original meanders of the former right 
bank of the Middle Fork of the Flathead River (Glacier National Park 
Boundary) and the subdivision of sections 6 and 7, and the survey of 
the present right bank meanders of the Middle Fork of the Flathead 
River (Glacier National Park Boundary), in sections 6 and 7, Township 
31 North, Range 17 West, Principal Meridian, Montana, was accepted May 
20, 1998.
    This survey was executed by personnel of the Flathead National 
Forest and was necessary to identify and establish boundaries for 
Glacier National Park and the Flathead National Forest caused by a 
change in the flow of the Middle Fork of the Flathead River.
    A copy of the preceding described plat, in three sheets, will be 
immediately placed in the open files and will be available to the 
public as a matter of information.
    If a protest against this survey, as shown on this plat, in three 
sheets, is received prior to the date of the official filing, the 
filing will be stayed pending consideration of the protest. This 
particular plat will not be officially filed until the day after all 
protests have been accepted or dismissed and become final or appeals 
from the dismissal affirmed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 222 North 
32nd Street, P.O. Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107-6800.

    Dated: May 29, 1998.
Daniel T. Mates,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Resources.
[FR Doc. 98-15434 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-M