alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ATA-10-271-E 

May 28, 2010 

 Exemption No. 4633M 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-12189 

Lieutenant Colonel Timothy M. Kersey 

Chief, Flight Standards Division 

Department of the Air Force 

6500 South MacArthur (AJW31AF) 

Oklahoma City, OK 73169 

Dear Lt. Col. Kersey: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 4633, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 5, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of the Department of the Air Force (USAF) for an extension of Exemption No. 4633, 

as amended. That exemption from § 91.215(b) and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations allows the USAF to conduct certain military training flight operations in 

designated airspace over 10,000 feet mean sea level without being required to operate the 

aircraft transponders. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to USAF. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 4633, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40109, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 4633, as amended, to 

September 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 4633, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 4633. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Edith Parish 

Manager, Airspace and Rules Group
#### Fernanda Vello et al., Appellants, v Liga Chilean de Futbol et al., Respondents. Public Administrator of the County of New York, as Administrator of the Estate of David Tagle, Deceased, Doing Business as Liga Chilean de Futbol, Nonparty.

[50 NYS3d 73]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Kalish, J.), entered October 28, 2015, which denied plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a) to substitute the “Public Administrator of New York County, as Administrator of the Estate of David Tagle, deceased d/b/a Liga Chilean de Fútbol” as a named defendant in place of defendant Liga Chilean De Fútbol, and granted defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the action as against Liga Chilean De Fútbol, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The infant plaintiff was injured when an inflatable ride collapsed during a festival sponsored by Liga Chilean de Fútbol (Liga Chilean), which obtained a permit identifying David Tagle as its authorized agent. Plaintiffs thereafter commenced an action against Liga Chilean and Randall’s Island Sports Foundation, Inc. In their answer, defendants denied the allegations that Liga Chilean was a corporation, and they subsequently informed plaintiffs that Liga Chilean was not a business entity, but was a name used by David Tagle to do business, and that Tagle had died two months after the accident, which was before this action was commenced. Although plaintiffs successfully petitioned Surrogate’s Court to issue limited letters of administration to the Public Administrator so that the *594administrator could be substituted as a party, they never served the Public Administrator with any motion to either substitute or add the Public Administrator as a party before the statute of limitations elapsed (CPLR 203, 210 [b]; 214 [5]).

The motion to substitute the Public Administrator as a defendant was properly denied because no action was ever brought against Tagle before his death *(Marte v Graber,*58 AD3d 1, 3 [1st Dept 2008]). Plaintiffs argue that the action against Liga Chilean should be treated as one against Tagle, but any action commenced against Tagle after his death would be a “nullity” since “the dead cannot be sued” *(id.).*Instead, plaintiffs were required to commence a legal action naming the personal representative of the decedent’s estate *(Jordan v City of New York,*23 AD3d 436, 437 [2d Dept 2005]).

Liga Chilean’s motion to dismiss was properly granted because it is not an existing entity and therefore cannot “sue or be sued” *(Zarzycki v Lan Metal Prods. Corp.,*62 AD3d 788, 789 [2d Dept 2009]).

Even assuming that Tagle conducted business in a deceptive or misleading manner through a fictitious entity, as plaintiffs argue, plaintiffs were not prejudiced or harmed as a result of that conduct. Indeed, defendants in this action disclosed to plaintiffs that Liga Chilean was not a legal entity well before the statute of limitations had elapsed. Thus, plaintiffs were not prejudiced or harmed by Tagle’s conduct.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
Decided June 1, 2017

#### Blake v State of New York

3d Dept: 145 AD3d 1336

denied*
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15919]



[[Page 32891]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Meeting

    Pursuant to section10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Board of Scientific Advisors on 
June 22-23, 1998 in Conference Room 10, Building 31C, National 
Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland.
    This meeting will be open on June 22 from 8 a.m. to recess and on 
June 23 from 8 a.m. to adjournment. Agenda items will include the 
following: NCI Director's Report; Deputy Director of Extramural 
Science's Reports; Legislative Update; Scientific Presentation(s); 
Concept Reviews; program review updates and reports, and discussions 
pertaining to new and ongoing Board business. Attendance by the public 
will be limited to space available.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations and 
additional information pertaining to the meeting should contact Dr. 
Paulette S. Gray, Executive Secretary, NCI Board of Scientific 
Advisors, 6130 Executive Blvd., EPN, Rm. 600C, Bethesda, MD 20892 (301-
496-4218).
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

    Dated: June 9, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 98-15919 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 14, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133597 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

GHALEB NAJIB HADDAD, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Personal Representative of the Justices Estate of Shibli Jamil Haddad,

Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 133597 

 COA: 266646 

Macomb CC: 2004-001381-NH 

DR. WALEED MAMMO, D.D.S., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of September 24, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the 

February 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the 

decision in Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879). On order of the 

Court, the case having been decided on November 28, 2007, ___ Mich ___ (2007), the 

application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting 

leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this 

case to the Macomb Circuit Court for entry of an order denying the defendant's motion 

for summary disposition and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order and 

the order in Mullins. 

l1211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 14, 2007 

Clerk
No. 10-5474.

#### Barbara Leone Corbin, Petitioner v. Barbara J. Wheeler, Warden.

562 U.S. 924, 131 S. Ct. 306,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7435,

178 L. Ed. 2d 198,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 763.
# DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City B-1 bomber team recognized for excellence in federal government

/ Published June 6, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Oklahoma City’s B-1 Bomber Supply Chain Critical Readiness team was recently recognized by the Oklahoma City based Oklahoma Federal Executive Board during the 2022 Excellence in Government Awards program held May 3.

DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City, based at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, took home the Senior Team Award in the Government Innovation category for providing outstanding support to the Air Force’s B-1 Lancer long-range bomber aircraft.

Last spring, the Air Force ordered a safety stand-down of its entire B-1 fleet after concerns arose about the safety of the augmenter fuel filter housing. The AFFH is a component that filters fuel before it passes into the plane’s engines.

Richard Schwing, deputy commander of DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City, wrote the nominating package for the award. He said the AFFH assembly is a DLA managed item, but there was no existing contract in place. 

Schwing said the DLA Aviation at Oklahoma City B-1 Bomber Supply Chain Critical Readiness team immediately developed a plan to resolve this situation. This involved coordinating the expedient delivery of AFFH parts from the B-1 operational fleet to Tinker AFB for inspection and expediting of the contract to provide new AFFH parts and ensuring immediate movement of parts to Tinker B-1 bases.

The team immediately began working directly with the Air Force B-1 System Program Office on Tinker AFB to ensure immediate shipment of AFFH assemblies to Tinker AFB for inspection and possible repair.  Processes that normally took days were completed in minutes or a few hours, including ensuring all transactions flowed correctly in our supply and logistics systems.              

The team then worked with a new supplier to have a contract solicited, reviewed, and awarded in 11 days, cutting out more than 100 days of lead time for this part. 

“The team used their expertise, teamwork and warfighter-focus to ensure critically needed parts in support of the Air Force B-1 bomber fleet were under contract, shipped, received, and installed as fast as possible.” Schwing said. “This directly contributed to our warfighting customer, the U.S. Air Force, keeping a vital national asset in service.”

In addition, the team coordinated with the Air Force and the supplier of the AFFH to dramatically reduce a normal acquisition and production lead time of 294 days to 49 days for first part delivery.

“The teamwork, technical knowledge, and can-do attitude of this team directly led to the B-1 fleet being returned to service months earlier than previously determined feasible, allowing this critical national asset to continue flying missions in support of national defense,” Schwing said.
No. 09-11263.

#### Phillip David Fussell, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 870, 131 S. Ct. 170,

178 L. Ed. 2d 101,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6661.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 366 Fed. Appx. 102.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2004 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        S.2004

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To extend until July 1, 1998, the exemption from ineligibility based 
on a high


       default rate for certain institutions of higher education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    The matter preceding clause (i) of section 435(a)(2)(C) of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1085(a)(2)(C)) is amended by 
striking ``July 1, 1994'' and inserting ``July 1, 1998''.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court

of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 8/21/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JESUS PASQUALE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 95-2108

(D.C. No. CR-94-395)

(District of New Mexico)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, Circuit Judge, REAVLEY,

** Senior Circuit Judge, and LUCERO,

Circuit Judge.

Convicted of possession with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of

cocaine and conspiracy, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 846, Jesus Pasquale

argues that insufficient evidence supports his conviction. We disagree and affirm.
- 2 -

Reviewing a claim that a criminal conviction is not supported by sufficient

evidence, we “determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential

elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. McKneely, 69 F.3d

1067, 1072 (10th Cir. 1995). We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the

government and “accept the jury’s resolution of conflicting evidence and assessment of

witness credibility.” Id.

Pasquale argues that there was no evidence that he ever possessed the cocaine at

issue here. He further argues that the testimony of his co-conspirator, Glembotski, was

insufficient to prove Pasquale’s involvement in the crime. Pasquale appears to concede

that Glembotski’s testimony, if credited, establishes his guilt, and asks us to find that his

testimony lacked credibility. This we cannot do. The assessment of witness credibility is

a jury function. Id. In any event, we have reviewed the record and conclude that the

government presented sufficient evidence for a rational jury to find, beyond a reasonable

doubt, that Pasquale and Glembotski possessed and conspired to transport ten kilograms

of cocaine from California to New York for distribution.

AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero

Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Air Act 
(``CAA'')

    Consistent with the policy set forth in the Department of Justice 
regulations at 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on May 20, 
1998, a proposed Consent Decree was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, in United States 
v. National Steel Corporation, Civil Action No. 97-850 (GPM). The 
proposed Consent Decree settles claims asserted by the United States, 
on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 
pursuant to Section 113(b) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 9613(b), in 
connection with operation of National Steel's steel manufacturing 
facility in Granite City, Illinois.
    The Consent Decree requires National Steel to pay $546,700 in civil 
penalties for alleged violation of opacity limits applicable to basic 
oxygen furnace operations in the federally enforceable Illinois State 
Implementation Plan (``SIP''), as well as violations of SIP permit 
conditions and emission limits and National Emissions Standards for 
Hazardous Air Pollutants (``NESHAP'') applicable to certain operations 
at National Steel's coke manufacturing plant in Granite City. The 
proposed Decree also requires National Steel to perform two 
supplemental environmental projects.
    The Department of Justice will receive written comments relating to 
the proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Comments should be directed to the 
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. National Steel Corporation, DOJ Reference #90-5-2-1-
2108.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois, 9 
Executive Drive, Suite 300, Fairview Heights, Illinois 62208, at the 
offices of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590, and at the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, 
(202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained 
in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library. In requesting a 
copy, please enclose a check in the amount of $5.50 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section.
[FR Doc. 98-15210 Filed 6-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
#### Com. v. Edmonds

04/12/2016

443 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa. Super., 125 A.3d 463
No. 09-1195.

#### Melissa Harman, et al., Petitioners v. Brent Pollock, et al.

562 U.S. 828, 131 S. Ct. 73,

178 L. Ed. 2d 24,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6265.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 1254.
#### Howe v. Hughes

OP 17-0303

06/06/17

Denied

Original Proceeding Habeas Corpus
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15793]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-594-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line; Notice of Request under Blanket 
Authorization

June 9, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 4, 1998, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco), Post Office Box 1396, Houston, Texas 77251, 
filed in Docket No. CP98-594-000, a request pursuant to Section 157.205 
and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205 and 157.212) for authorization to construct a new 
delivery point to North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation (NCNG), under 
Transco's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-426-000, 
pursuant to 18 CFR Part 157, Subpart F of the Natural Gas Act, all as 
more fully set forth in the request which is on file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    Transco states that NCNG is a transportation, storage and sales 
customer of Transco under Transco's Rate Schedules IT, FT, GSS, WSS, 
ESS, LG-A, FS and X-302. It is also stated that pursuant to NCNG's 
request, Transco proposes to construct the Conway Meter Station at 
milepost 131.34 on Transco's South Virginia Lateral in Conway, 
Northhampton County, North Carolina. It is further stated that the 
Conway Meter Station would consist of one 4-inch tap on Transco's 
pipeline, a single 2-inch orifice meter tube, odorization equipment, 
and data acquisition and communication equipment. Transco also states 
that this point of delivery would be used by NCNG to receive gas into 
its local distribution system.
    Transco states that the Conway Meter Station would be used by NCNG 
to receive into its local distribution system up to 3,384 Mdf of gas 
per day from Transco. It is stated that the estimated cost to construct 
the Conway Meter Station is $293,000 and what NCNG would be responsible 
for all costs associated with this project.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15793 Filed 6-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit No. 32.   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Gas Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ronald W. Jibson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard J. Doleshek, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR GAS COMPANY   May 7, 2010 /s/Ronald W. Jibson Ronald W. Jibson President and Chief Executive Officer    May 7, 2010 /s/Richard J. Doleshek Richard J. Doleshek Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer