alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jonathan Rivera, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 668]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lopresto, J.), rendered March 18, 2015, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Chambers, J.P., Austin, Roman and Bar-ros, JJ., concur.
#### Joe Evans and Willie Brown, *Plaintiffs in*Error, vs. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

144 So. 656.

En Banc.

Opinion filed November 22, 1932.

*Buie & Hipler,*for Plaintiffs in Error;

*Cary T>. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs in error were indicted and convicted for receiving and concealing stolen property. Each was sentenced to three years in the State Penitentiary and they seek to be relieved of that judgment by writ of error.

It is contended that the trial Court committed error in his charge to the jury, in his admission of testimony, in his refusal to instruct a verdict for the defendants and in his denial of defendant’s motion for new trial.

We have examined the record in the light of each of these assignments and while the evidence is conflicting, there is ample predicate for the verdict. and judgment as to the defendant, Brown, but as to the defendant, Evans, the evidence is insufficient. Otherwise no reversible error was committed.

The questions raised have been settled by repeated decisions of this Court so a discussion of them would serve no useful purpose. The judgment below is accordingly affirmed as to Brown but it is reversed for a new trial as to Evans.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Buford, C.J., dissents as to reversal as to Evans.

Brown, J., not participating.
Exhibit 13.1



Section 906 Certification



The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Claudio Melandri, the Chief Executive Officer,
Emiliano Muratore, the Chief Financial Officer, and Guillermo Sabater, the Financial Controller, of Banco Santander-Chile, each
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Banco Santander-Chile.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 24, 2017



|/s/ Claudio Melandri          
|------------------------------
|Name:	Claudio Melandri        
|Title:	Chief Executive Officer
|                              

|/s/ Emiliano Muratore         
|------------------------------
|Name:	Emiliano Muratore       
|Title:	Chief Financial Officer
|                              

|/s/ Guillermo Sabater      
|---------------------------
|Name:	Guillermo Sabater    
|Title:	Financial Controller



|
|
No. 09-10977.

#### William Connelly, Petitioner v. Theresa Lantz.

562 U.S. 950, 131 S. Ct. 126,

178 L. Ed. 2d 247,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7653.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Same case below, 366 Fed. Appx. 194.
# DLA Distribution’s Barr is dedicated to serving those who serve

/ Published Nov. 17, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Supply Management Specialist Domon Barr was recognized on Veterans Day for his outstanding volunteer service supporting veterans and their families.The award ceremony took place at the United States Army Heritage and Education Center, at Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania. Commandant of the US Army War College, U.S. Army Maj. Gen. David Hill, presented Barr with an award as well as his Commandant’s coin.

Outside of his government job, Barr manages a food distribution program for veterans and their families based out of Middletown, Pennsylvania, which takes place the first Friday of each month.His program initially provided meals to 23 families and has grown to serving 126 families. Barr started the food service program in 2019 and doesn’t have any intentions of slowing down.

“I will keep going as long as I can sustain, it’s a joy knowing I can make a difference in someone else’s life.” stated Barr.

Barr served a combined 25 years in the military between the Air Force and the Army before retiring. He started his federal civilian career with DLA in 2007 as a materials handler and worked his way up to his present position which he obtained in 2014.

Barr is also an active member of the Blacks in Government organization, which works to promote equity in all aspects of American life, excellence in public service and opportunity for all Americans. BIG is primarily a volunteer membership-driven association that functions as an employee support group, community resource and an advocacy group.

When asked why he continues to serve Barr replied. “The yearning to serve and continue to serve in this capacity is something that found me, I didn’t find it.”
No. D-2497.

#### In the Matter of Discipline of Jaffa F. Stein.

562 U.S. 808, 131 S. Ct. 397,

178 L. Ed. 2d 263,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7636.

October 4, 2010.

Jaffa F. Stein, of Voor-hees, New Jersey, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 09-1515.

#### Scott N. Bergman, Petitioner v. District of Columbia, et al.

562 U.S. 838, 131 S. Ct. 179,

178 L. Ed. 2d 41,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5915.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 986 A.2d 1208.
#### People v Beebe

4th Dept: 137 AD3d 1663 (Wayne)

denied 8/2/16 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

KMG Chemicals, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-164686) and Form S-3 (333-144349 and 333-129879) of KMG Chemicals, Inc. of our reports dated November 27, 2015, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of KMG Chemicals, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended July 31, 2015, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2015, which reports appears in the July 31, 2015 annual report on Form 10-K of KMG Chemicals, Inc.

Our report dated November 27, 2015, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2015, expresses our opinion that KMG Chemicals, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2015, because of the effect of material weaknesses pertaining to the Company’s control environment, risk assessment activities, and monitoring activities.

(signed) KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas

November 27, 2015
No. 10-5448.

#### Vera McBride, Petitioner v. Albert Murray.

562 U.S. 922, 131 S. Ct. 301,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7275.

178 L. Ed. 2d 195,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.

Same case below, 287 Ga. 99, 694 S.E.2d 99.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2332

MARGE IANNUCCI,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

MICHAEL A. IANNUCCI,

 Plaintiff,

v.

RITE AID CORPORATION, et al,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: February 28, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marge Iannucci, Appellant Pro Se. Beth A. Moeller, OGLETREE, 

DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Atlanta, Georgia; Michael 

Lawrence Wade, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, 

PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Marge Iannucci appeals the district court’s order 

entering judgment in her employment discrimination action in 

accordance with the Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 offer and 

dismissing the remainder of the action for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction. She also appeals the order compelling

discovery and entering a confidentiality order. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. 

July 24 & Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         175,157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (20,906)
<INVENTORY>                                    233,117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               718,841
<PP&E>                                       1,329,949
<DEPRECIATION>                               (709,222)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,346,004
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          183,338
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,836,563
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,733,897)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,346,004
<SALES>                                        676,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               676,290
<CGS>                                          309,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,341,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,974,600)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
2016-1490.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Peck.

On notice of violation and motion to lift stay. Respondent shall show cause by filing a written response with the clerk of this court within ten days why he should not be held in contempt, the stay of his *1464suspension should not be revoked, and he should not be suspended for failure to comply with this court’s order of May 30, 2017.
# DSCC Toastmasters Clubs to host joint meeting, competition March 31

/ Published March 26, 2021
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Supply Center Columbus is home to three Toastmasters International Clubs and this week anyone assigned to the installation will have the opportunity to see how Toastmasters may benefit them when the three clubs host a joint meeting and competition.

Defensively Speaking Club #4410308, AGOISSI Club #3500 and the DFAS Toastmasters Club #7114 will connect virtually through the ZOOM conferencing tool from 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. March 31 for a Table Topics meeting that all interested associates are welcome to tune in to.

Event organizers said what makes this meeting so significant is the rarity of having clubs so geographically close to each other, which also allows individuals to find the right fit for their goals. Together, these clubs represent more than 50 DSCC associates from all disciplines and backgrounds, working together to become more competent and confident speakers, communicators and leaders. 

Table Topics is a format where the speaker is given the topic on the spot and must develop a 1-2 minute talk on that topic without time to prepare in advance. This is a skill particularly useful for those who may be in a meeting and find themselves asked to present information without advance notice or preparation. This format leans more toward fun and topics can be more personalized or humorous. Normal meetings consist of two or three speeches, followed by evaluations that recognize the strong parts of individual presentations along with offering suggestions for improvement in a friendly and supportive atmosphere.

Guests are always welcome at Toastmasters meetings. To be added to the link for this joint meeting or future meetings, please email Marizela Marin-Giraud at Marizela.Marin-Giraud@dla.mil or Maramcel Rivera at Maramcel.Rivera@dla.mil.  At the meeting, you will be able to see the three clubs in action and can decide if joining one of them is right for you.

Toastmasters International is a worldwide nonprofit educational organization that empowers individuals to become more effective communicators and leaders. Headquartered in Englewood, Colorado, the organization’s membership exceeds 352,000 in more than 16,400 clubs in 141 countries. For information about local Toastmasters clubs, please visit www.toastmasters.org.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         7,976
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         12,078
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               26,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    54,929
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         39,250
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           38,456
<LOANS>                                        163,731
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 312,103
<DEPOSITS>                                     255,805
<SHORT-TERM>                                   86
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,158
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       521
<OTHER-SE>                                     52,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 312,103
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                5,832
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2,760
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               1,170
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               9,762
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             4,548
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,572
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          5,190
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  50
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3,318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,003
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     2,003
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,288
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.57
<LOANS-NON>                                    759
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,094
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,144
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,144
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
/DocketNo:2016-2859DirectorateID:2016-NE-04-ADDispositionCommentsOriginatingOfficeTrackingNo.:SP03709EN-ENextStep:i2!lFRAN0SNFRMDThesecommentsareinresponsetoanSNPRMIZJNoComments/OnlySupportiveCommentsReceived-ljthisboxischecked,nosignaturesarerequired.NoHasthereferencedserviceinformationbeenrevisedsincetheNPRl\11wasissued?Ifyes,listlatestrevisionandattachacopy.NotethatchangesbeyondthescopeofthepreviouslypublishedNPRMwillrequireanewnotice.ContacttheDirectoratefocalpointforguidance.Instructions:Summarizeallcommentsbyissue(notbycommenter)andprovideyourrecommendedresolutionofeachissue.Allcommentsrelatingtothesameissueshouldbediscussedtogether.Donotlistalloftheissuesfromonecommentertogether.IfchangestotheADarerequiredbasedonthecommentsreceived,explainwhyanddescribeindetailwhatchange(s)yourecommend.ReferenceFAA-IR-M-8040.1CChapter9.ISSUE1:Selectoneofthefollowing:Ifother,explain:Commenter(s):WhatchangetotheADactionisrequested?Whyisthechangerequestedorhowisitjustified?Doweagree?IfYES,weagreebecauseN/A.MakethefollowingchangestotheAD:IfPARTIALLYAGREE,weagreewithInserttextbecauseInsertjustificationWedisagreewithInserttextbecauseInsertjustificatiooMakethefollowingchangestotheAD:LlstanychangestotheADIfNO,wedon'tagreebecauseInsertourrationaleISSUE2:Selectoneofthefollowing:Chooseone.Ifother,explain:Clickheretoentertext.Commenter(s):Clickheretoentertext.WhatchangetotheADactionisrequested?Clickheretoentertext.Whyisthechangerequestedorhowisitjustified?Clickheretoentertext.Doweagree?YesNoIfYES,weagreebecauseInsertjustificationMakethefollowingchangestotheAD:ListnmchangestotheADPageIof3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramak Radparvar, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 822]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Naclerio, J.), rendered November 20, 2000, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*463We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
# How Disposition Services fits into the electric vehicle procurement puzzle 

/ Published April 18, 2023
BATTLE CREEK, Mich. , 
In an effort to combat the evolving climate crisis, U.S. President Joseph Biden signed Executive Order 14057: “Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability” Dec. 8, 2021.

According to section 102 of EO 14057, the government-wide goal is to lead the nation on a firm path to net-zero emissions by 2050. In doing so, the federal procurement and operational policies will change to align with the new goal of securing a transition to clean, zero-emission technologies.

The White House released a statement announcing the federal fleet of electric vehicle acquisitions have more than doubled and in fiscal year 2023, agencies have acquired five times as many EVs as all last fiscal year.

A focal point for Defense Logistics Agency is the disposal process for federally procured EVs. When EVs reach end of life, what will the disposal process entail for the 1,000-pound EV battery?

To better understand what that process would look like, DLA Disposition Services employees traveled to Detroit, Michigan, to attend a global EV battery conference that focused on reuse and recycle opportunities and discussed the possibility of a circular EV battery economy.

Knowing industry standards is the first step in preparing the agency for future EV battery disposal.  

Discussion topics included EV battery transportation, reuse and recycling options, black mass and battery resources, various types of EV battery resource recovery, and more.

While not all speaking themes covered areas that are related to DLA Disposition Services’ disposal process, it was an opportunity for employees to learn about the advancements that are being made in the EV battery world.

“I was pleasantly surprised because it seems like there are a lot of [EV battery] recyclers,” DLA Disposition Services Public Sales Division Chief Carlos Torres said. “For DLA Disposition Services, posturing ourselves for when the time comes to dispose of electric vehicles, it seems like there is a disposal outlet in the form of potentially a public sale to an electric vehicle recycler. It seems like we would have a disposal outlet.”

Additionally, select DLA Disposition Services employees participate in the Federal Consortium for Advanced Batteries, a group that was created to discuss advanced battery efforts and develop a healthy EV battery ecosystem.  

The Executive Order affects about 380,000 federal vehicles that need to be replaced in the near future.
### Letters (76 - 100} received in support ofthe SkyWest proposal for DOT-OST-2009-0300 Alpena, MlAir Service For complete letter/communicationscontactJackie Krawczak atthe Alpena Area Chamber of Commerce. 989.354.4181. An 

## * indicatesthe full text has been forwarded tothe DOT. 

### Business name Signed by 76. Allscripts Healthcare Services (Raleigh NC) Linda Brown 77. Senator Moolenaar SenatorJohn Moolenaar 78. Isackson Wallace 

### & Pfeifer PC Keith Wallace 79. Presque Isle County Board ofCommissioners Carl Altman 80. citizen ofCA/frequenttravelerto Alpena Susan Anderson 81. Aviation Flight Science/Admin Major- WMU Spencer Losinski 82. American Pain Consultants Michael Bitler 83. Dr. Tony Skiba DDS Dr. Tony Skiba 84. citizens Kathleen and Tim Lutes 85. citizen Julie Murray 86. The Boys and Girls Club ofAlpena Susan Nielsen 87. Charter Communications- Alpena Ethan Clarke 88. citizen/technical consultant Bryan Dort 89. Model Printing Service Ed Klimczak 90. Timm Construction Company Paul Dusterhoft 91. citizen George McDermid 92. New Life Christian Fellowship Pastor Gary Smith 93. City of Rogers City resolution by City Council 94. citizens- Ossineke Gary and Michelle Smith 95. citizen Kurt Pratel 96. citizens Sue and Eric Kesling97. citizen 98. Alcona County Board ofCommissioners 99. citizen 100. citizen Sandra Ball Commissioners Richard Cook Carol Shafto