alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 10/2/96

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

VERNETTA TAYLOR-PACE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS,

INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1465

(D.C. No.93-WY-1791-WD)

(D. Colo)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRORBY, BARRETT, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

In this appeal from the judgment entered for defendant on plaintiff’s

employment discrimination claims, the sole issue presented is whether the district

court abused its discretion in precluding plaintiff from introducing at trial

evidence concerning an employment grievance proceeding. See, e.g., Pandit v.

American Honda Motor Co., 82 F.3d 376, 379 (10th Cir. 1996)(appellate court

reviews evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion). The district court excluded

evidence of the grievance proceeding under Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403, and 408. 

While Rule 408 does not require the exclusion of evidence regarding the

settlement of a claim entirely different from the claim being litigated, see

Broadcort Capital Corp. v. Summa Medical Corp., 972 F.2d 1183, 1194 (10th Cir.

1992), as is the case here, admission of such evidence nonetheless implicates the

same concerns with prejudice and deterrence to settlements underlying Rule 408,

see Orth v. Emerson Elec. Co., 980 F.2d 632, 639 (10th Cir. 1992). In light of the

strong deference afforded the trial court in these matters, see, e.g., United States

v. Roberts, 88 F.3d 872, 880 (10th Cir. 1996)(addressing exclusion of evidence

under Rule 403), we cannot say the district court abused its discretion in

excluding this evidence under Rules 401 and 403. See Orth, 980 F.2d at 638-39. 
-3-

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of

Colorado is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Wade Brorby

Circuit Judge
No. 10-5396.

#### Kevin Lomack, Petitioner v. L.E. Scribner, Warden.

562 U.S. 919, 131 S. Ct. 290,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7335.

178 L. Ed. 2d 190,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
No. 09-11450.

#### Dana DeSosa, Petitioner v. Frederick Brown, Warden.

562 U.S. 881, 131 S. Ct. 201,

178 L. Ed. 2d 121,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6713.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 901.
No. 10-5370.

#### Richard Steven Brown, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 918, 131 S. Ct. 285,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6830.

178 L. Ed. 2d 187,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 643.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 33096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-16071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts, Combined Arts Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Panel, Music Section A (Creation & Presentation 
Category) to the National Council on the Arts will be held on July 13-
16, 1998. The panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on July 13 
and 14, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on July 15, and from 9:00 a.m. to 
1:00 p.m. on July 16, in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C., 20506. A portion of this 
meeting, from 1:30 to 4:00 p.m. on July 15, will be open to the public 
for a policy discussion on field needs, Leadership/Millennium 
initiatives, and guidelines.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 
on July 13 and 14, from 9:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. on July 15, and from 
9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on July 16, are for the purpose of Panel review, 
discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on applications for 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the 
determination of the Chairman of May 14, 1998, these sessions will be 
closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4),(6) and (9)(B) of 
section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and, if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal 
employee in attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, 
TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, 
National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, call 202/682-
5691.

    Dated: June 11, 1998.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 98-16071 Filed 6-16-1998; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
No. 10-5606.

#### Anthony Castillo Sanchez, Petitioner v. Oklahoma.

562 U.S. 931, 131 S. Ct. 326,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7658.

178 L. Ed. 2d 212,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.

Same case below, 223 P.3d 980.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Norbert E. Woodhams, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pierre Foods,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: July 20, 2004      /S/ NORBERT E. WOODHAMS
# Former acquisition executive receives DOD ‘Legend’ award

/ Published April 6, 2023
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Former Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Acquisition Executive Milton Lewis earned the 2022 Pricing and Contracting Legends Award during the Senior Contracting Leaders Summit March 30.

The award, established in 2013, is presented by the Office of the Under Secretary for Acquisition and Sustainment’s Defense Pricing and Contracting branch annually to honor leaders at all levels within the Defense Department’s acquisition and contracting community who embody inspirational leadership and mentorship in execution of their duties.

Lewis is a retired member of the Senior Executive Service and was the first acquisition executive in DLA Land and Maritime’s history. He was unable to attend the presentation, and current DLA Land and Maritime Acquisition Executive Mark Brown accepted the award on his behalf. 

Lewis and co-recipient Yvette Krasts, pricing division chief for Army Contracting Command – Redstone Arsenal, were selected from a list of nominees as the individuals Department leaders believe best exemplify the contracting wisdom and values characterized by esteemed leaders.

“Their commitment to the professional development and mentorship of the workforce, effective collaboration, and creative leadership, make them two of the most influential and respected leaders within the Department of Defense acquisition and contracting community,” said Defense Pricing and Contracting Principal Director John Tenaglia in a memo announcing their selection.

The entirety of Lewis’ career was spent in support of national defense, beginning with a distinguished 29-year Army career, and including several years in a key position within the defense industry before shifting to the federal civilian workforce. Lewis retired from DLA Land and Maritime in 2017, having served as the organization’s Acquisition Executive since 2008.

Key initiatives that marked his DLA career included establishing the Strategic Supplier Alliance Program to strengthen defense industry relationships; inspiring hundreds of acquisition professionals to receive Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act certifications; and championing the First Destination Transportation and Packaging Initiative that integrated multiple DLA supply chains with transportation providers, the Defense Contract Management Agency and the military services.

Lewis left DLA Land and Maritime with a legacy of acquisition excellence, strategic warfighter support and meaningful collaboration.

Hear Lewis in his own words on solving logistics challenges presented by a key project early in his DLA Land and Maritime leadership tenure:
#### Com. v. Martone 22

05/05/2016

864 MAL (2015)

22

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 100
#### Nella Manko, Appellant, v David A. Gabay et al., Respondents.

Decided March 28, 2017

Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the October 2016 order dismissing plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment, dismissed by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining portions of the orders appealed from do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ James H. Moore  James H. Moore Chief Financial Officer Date: November 10, 2006     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.                  1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nelson Genao, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 883]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), entered on or about May 6, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*467The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure *(see People v Gillotti,*23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The various mitigating factors cited by defendant, such as his age and lack of a prior criminal record, were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, or were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying sex crimes committed against multiple victims, as young as nine years old, which continued for many years.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Renwick, Gische, Oing and Singh, JJ.
MICHIGAN -'i^A-Jlim .. A] i 

.-'.en,-.-

COMMERCE BANK 

February 9, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Sun Country Slot Exemption - Docket Number FAA-2012-0089 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Sun Country Airlines has requested an exemption from the slot limited for Ronald Reagan 

Washington National Airport (DCA) set forth in § 93.123 (a), to permit the FAA to create air 

carrier slots during certain limited hours for Sun Country's use. The proposed air carrier 

slots would replace two slot exemptions under DOT Order 2010-12-16 awarded to Sun 

Country. On January 6, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of 

Columbia Circuit vacated the DOT Order, and Sun Country will lose its existing service 

between DCA and Lansing's Capital Region International Airport. Specifically, Sun 

Country desires one daily slot during each of the 1000 and 1100 hours. The proposed 

exemption would permit Sun Country to continue operating its existing services and avoid 

an inequitable result of the Court's order. 

As an employee of Capitol Bancorp Limited, it is convenient to have an airport within the 

Greater Lansing area that provides travel service to our employees, clients and families. 

Personally, the flight into Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) is a 

wonderful service to my family as we travel frequently to visit our new grandchild. 

The Sun Country DCA service is essential to the economic growth of the Greater Lansing 

Region. The daily service is the only large aircraft (737-800) service to Washington 

Reagan Airport, in the state of Michigan outside of Detroit. Prior to Sun Country, the 

regional community had requested the introduction of this service from numerous other 

airline operators without success. Accordingly, it is critical that the FAA take the necessary 

steps to ensure the continuation of the Sun Country slots at the established flight times in 

support of Greater Lansing's business and economic growth. 

Member P.O. Box 13037 • Lansing, MI 48901-3037 *^ Y 

FDIC tel: 517.374.5333 • fax: 517.267.4610 • www.michigancommercebank.com ife n 
Your immediate approval of this exemption, so that Sun Country can begin to enter flights 

schedules for sale for the balance of 2012, will be greatly appreciated. 

Bruce Thomas 

President of Bank Operations
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Scott E. Willkomm, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Scott E. Willkomm
---------------------

Scott E. Willkomm
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2005

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re
Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

AHMED AHMED,

Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

______________________

2022

- 1347

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in No. DA

- 0752

- 21

- 0003

- I

- 1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

Before L OURIE

, C HEN , and S TARK

, Circuit Judges

.

P ER C URIAM

.
O R D E R

After t he administrative judge dismissed his appeal for lack of jurisdiction

, Ahmed Ahmed bypassed review by the Merit Systems Protection Board ( which lacked a quorum at

the time ) and filed a petition for review at this court . The

Board now moves to remand

, so that it can consider the jurisdictional issue in the first instance . The Board states Case: 22-1347 Document: 19 Page: 1 Filed: 08/25/2022AHMED v. MSPB 2

that Mr. Ahmed does not oppose “subject to the preservation of all rights to appeal any and all currently pending

issues in the instant action a nd/or any issues remanded pursuant to a remand in this action.” Mot. at 2. T he court agrees that remand here could preserve party and judicial resources, and therefore grants the motion.

Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted. The case is remanded to the

Board for additional proceedings consistent with this order

. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

August 25 , 2022

Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 25, 2022 Case: 22-1347 Document: 19 Page: 2 Filed: 08/25/2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: K.B.R., A MINOR

PETITION OF: K.B.R., A MINOR :

:

:

:

: No. 138 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of August, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000


<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            1,119
<SECURITIES>                                      1,503
<RECEIVABLES>                                    19,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                        533
<INVENTORY>                                      15,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 37,786
<PP&E>                                           60,779
<DEPRECIATION>                                   41,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   60,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            20,072
<BONDS>                                             162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          1,348
<OTHER-SE>                                       40,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     60,447
<SALES>                                          22,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 22,473
<CGS>                                            16,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    16,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     35
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,215
<INCOME-TAX>                                        393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 822
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        822
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.70



</TABLE>
No. 09-11570.

#### William C. Crabbe, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 888, 131 S. Ct. 223,

178 L. Ed. 2d 134,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6950.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 412.
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



This AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is dated as of September 28, 2006, between Silvia M. Mullens ("Employee"), Ameritrans Capital Corporation ("Ameritrans"), and Elk Associates Funding Corporation ("Elk") (collectively, Ameritrans and Elk are hereinafter referred to as the "Employer").



WHEREAS, Employee is presently employed by Employer as Vice President of Employer pursuant to an Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2002 (the "2002 Agreement"); and



WHEREAS, the Employer and Employee desire to restate and amend certain terms of the 2002 Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
No. 10-5180.

#### Ronald Murray, Petitioner v. Jason Lene, et al.

562 U.S. 908, 131 S. Ct. 255,

178 L. Ed. 2d 168,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7092.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 595 F.3d 868.