alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15422]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD 08-98-022]


Drawbridge Operating Regulation; Atchafalaya River, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District has issued a 
temporary deviation from the regulation in 33 CFR 117.5 governing the 
operation of the Union Pacific Railroad swing span bridge across the 
Atchafalaya River, mile 95.7 at Krotz Springs, Louisiana. This 
deviation allows the Union Pacific Railroad to close the bridge to 
navigation from 7 a.m. on Monday, July 27, 1998 through 6 p.m. on 
Monday, August 3, 1998. This temporary deviation is issued to allow for 
the replacement of the electric motors, gears and associated machinery 
of the swing span operating mechanism

DATES: This deviation is effective 7 a.m. on Monday, July 27, 1998 
through 6 p.m. on Monday, August 3, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Phil Johnson, Bridge Administration Branch, Commander (ob), Eighth 
Coast Guard District, 501 Magazine Street, New Orleans, Louisiana, 
70130-3396, telephone number 504-589-2965.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Union Pacific Railroad swing span bridge 
across the Atchafalaya River, mile 95.7 at Krotz Springs, Louisiana has 
a vertical clearance of 6 feet above mean high water, elevation 38.5 
feet Mean Sea Level, in the closed-to-navigation position and unlimited 
clearance in the open-to-navigation position. Navigation on the 
waterway consists primarily of tugs with tows and occasional 
recreational craft. Presently, the draw opens on signal.
    The Union Pacific Railroad requested a temporary deviation from the 
normal operation of the bridge in order to accomplish the maintenance 
work. The work consists of replacing the electric motors, gears and 
other components of the operating machinery. This work is essential for 
the continued operation of the swing span. Alternate navigation routes 
are available. Mariners may transit the Atchafalaya River to the site 
of the bridge from both upstream via the Red River and Mississippi 
River and from downstream via Atchafalaya Bay.
    The District Commander has, therefore, issued a deviation from the 
regulations in 33 CFR 117.5 authorizing the Union Pacific Railroad 
swing span bridge across the Atchafalaya River, mile 95.7 at Krotz 
Springs, Louisiana to remain in the closed-to-navigation position from 
7 a.m. on July 27, 1998 through 6 p.m. on August 3, 1998.

    Dated: June 1, 1998.
A.L. Gerfin, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 8th Coast Guard Dist., Acting.
[FR Doc. 98-15422 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350

The undersigned, Melanie Paisley Miller, is the Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of AF Financial Group (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2006 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement
be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                   |  |                    |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | ------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  | AF Financial Group
|                   |  |                   
|Dated May 12, 2006 |  | By:                |  | /s/ Melanie Paisley Miller           
|                   |  |                    |  | Melanie Paisley Miller               
|                   |  |                    |  | Executive Vice President, Secretary, 
|                   |  |                    |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-10059.

#### Alexandre L. Hochstraser, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 843, 131 S. Ct. 75,

178 L. Ed. 2d 51,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6085.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, denied.

Same case below, 178 Cal. App. 4th 883, 100 Cal. Rptr. 3d 728.
No. 10-5708.

#### Granville Paul Bogle, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 935, 131 S. Ct. 343,

178 L. Ed. 2d 220,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7194.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 864.
EXHIBIT 32.2





STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE





Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Thomas Granville, Principal Financial Officer of Axion Power International, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Charles R. TregoCharles R. Trego, Principal Financial OfficerDated: April 29, 2011
# Fiscal 2022 history report details agency’s latest efforts

/ Published April 11, 2023
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Rapid response and technology transformation are among themes of the Defense Logistics Agency’s fiscal 2022 historical report published early this month.

“As usual, our people were the main characters,” DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic says in the opening message. “The DLA team responded to the emergencies at pace while carrying out calculated plans to modernize and prepare for the future.”

The 247-page document features an executive summary by DLA Historian Colin Williams and reports from all six major subordinate commands as well as 16 headquarters-level directorates.

DLA’s support to U.S. European Command doubled in fiscal 2022 after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The agency obligated almost $1.8 billion in spare parts, construction items, tents, fuel, food and more for U.S. troops in the theater.

The year was also marked by the debut of the Warehouse Management System, which is expected to improve efficiency and auditability at DLA warehouses around the world. WMS is part of DLA’s largest information technology modernization in over 20 years.

National events help drive the agency’s response and achievements, said Williams, who’s chronicled the agency’s history every year since 2019.

“Our focus on management efficiency involves repair parts and missions that by themselves seem small but, when viewed in totality, have a significant effect on the readiness of our military forces and security of the American population,” he said, citing WMS and DLA Distribution’s COVID-19 test kit mission as proof.

He said DLA’s historical reports help illuminate trends in areas ranging from small business partnerships to staffing.

“For example, the DLA workforce has shrunk marginally each of the three years from fiscal 2019 to fiscal 2022. Quietly we’ve managed in fiscal 2022 to figure out how to do the same work as three years ago but with about 1,000 fewer employees,” he said.

The report is a public document and was cleared by DLA Intelligence to protect sensitive and classified information.

Previous reports and other historical information is available at on the DLA History page.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1972

To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of

1968 to authorize inclusion in a community policing grant of funds

to pay 25 percent of the cost of providing bulletproof vests for 100,000

police officers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. BINGAMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe

Streets Act of 1968 to authorize inclusion in a community policing grant of funds to pay 25 percent of the

cost of providing bulletproof vests for 100,000 police

officers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BULLETPROOF VESTS FOR 100,000 POLICE

4 OFFICERS.

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the

6 ‘‘Bulletproof Vest Police Safety Act of 1994’’.
2

•S 1972 IS

1 (b) GRANT AUTHORIZATION.—Section 1701(b) of

2 title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act

3 of 1968, as added by section 103(a) of the Violent Crime

4 Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1993, is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

6 (1);

7 (2) by striking the period at the end of para8 graph (2) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

9 (3) by adding at the end the following new

10 paragraph:

11 ‘‘(3) pay 25 percent of the cost of providing a

12 number of bulletproof vests equal to the number of

13 law enforcement officers hired or rehired with grant

14 monies (for use by those officers or other officers

15 whose duties may expose them to gunfire).’’.

16 (c) ALLOCATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

17 1001(a)(11)(B) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control

18 and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as added by section 103(c)

19 of the Violent Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1993,

20 is amended in the third sentence by inserting ‘‘(of which

21 funds $14,000,000 shall be available to provide assistance

22 in purchasing bulletproof vests under section 1701(b)(3))’’

23 after ‘‘specified in section 1701(b)’’.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.A


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Stephen C. Beasley                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | Stephen C. Beasley                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | Chairman of the Board and President                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|
| | November 4, 2005                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|
| | A signed original of this written statement required by
    Section 906 has been provided to ANR Pipeline Company and
    will be retained by ANR Pipeline Company and furnished to the
    Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1
   
  THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906
 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
   
   Dated:  August 10, 2009
  /s/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
 Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
 President and Chairman of the Board
#### Com. v. Holly12

04/20/2016

021 MAL (2016)

12

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 654
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roberto Aquero, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 671]—

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (William *455Mogulescu, J.), rendered December 11, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
2018-0115.

#### State ex rel. Quinn v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections.

In Mandamus. On motion of Boatman, Inc., and Savko Bros. Properties X, L.L.C., to intervene as party respondents. Motion granted. On respondent Delaware County Board of Elections’ motions to convert case and to expedite. Motions granted.

Alternative writ granted and the following briefing schedule set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs: relator shall file any evidence and merit brief within five days, respondents shall file any evidence and merit briefs within five days after the filing of relator’s merit brief, and relator may file a reply brief within three days after the filing of the last of respondents’ merit briefs.

O’Connor, C.J., and Fischer and DeGenaro, JJ., would grant the motion to intervene only as to Boatman, Inc.
# Gimcheon site destroys 60+ Army ambulances

/ Published July 14, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
The Defense Logistics Agency’s property disposal team in South Korea recently helped assure U.S. Army readiness by assisting the Camp Carroll-based 65th Medical Battalion to part ways with more than 60 aging ambulances.

                Property Disposal Specialist George Bulan inspects armored ambulances turned in to DLA Disposition Services by the U.S. Army 65th Medical Battalion based out of Camp Carroll, South Korea, prior to the vehicles’ destruction.                            Inspecting Ambulances                            Property Disposal Specialist George Bulan inspects armored ambulances turned in to DLA Disposition Services by the U.S. Army 65th Medical Battalion based out of Camp Carroll, South Korea, prior to the vehicles’ destruction.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA PhotoVIRIN: 210309-D-D0441-2345The trucks, known officially as M977A3s, are built on a High-Mobility Multi-Wheeled Vehicle, or HMMWV frame, and have “advanced armor protection,” according to the manufacturer. Additionally, they can potentially operate in nuclear, biological, or chemical response situations, can perform water crossings up to 60 inches deep and climb road grades as steep as 60 percent – making them something far from a normal ambulance.   

According to Property Disposal Specialist George Bulan, the Gimcheon-based DLA Disposition Services property disposal crew recently oversaw the full dismantling and destruction of the vehicles, per established demilitarization guidelines, over a period of a few months as the Army turned in a handful of the vehicles at a time.

“These vehicles don’t have an offensive capability,” Bulan said, which is one of the primary reasons items are typically coded for destruction. In the case of these armored battlefield ambulances, however, an adversary could potentially recover various parts to “restore or repair to a usable condition.” DLA’s “Demilitarization as Condition of Sale” contracts deny the opportunity for individual pieces to slip out of the reverse logistics chain to be sold and put back together later.

DLA Disposition Services oversees the demilitarization of millions of pounds of eventual scrap at locations all around the world each year, the sales of which offset costs incurred by the armed services for disposal support.
*March 29, 2017*

2017-Ohio-1152.]

2017-0415.

#### State v. Davenport.

Montgomery App. Nos. 27096 and 27097, 2017-Ohio-688. Sua sponte, appellee ordered to file a response, if any, to the motion to stay the execution of the sentence, no later than 12:00 p.m. on Friday, March 31, 2017.
No. 10-5838.

#### Donald Joseph Schwindt, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 939, 131 S. Ct. 351,

178 L. Ed. 2d 227,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7256.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 721.
VI

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2339

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel WHY KNOT.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 29 (legislative day, JULY 20), 1994

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

WHY KNOT.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 for the vessel WHY KNOT, United States official number

9 688570.

Æ
(January 4, 2018)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cristobal Colon, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 498]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia M. Núñez, J.), rendered January 7, 2016, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of two years, unanimously affirmed.

The Court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The record supports the court’s finding that the totality of the information available to the police supported a reasonable conclusion that there was a weapon in defendant’s van that posed an actual, specific danger to the officers’ safety, justifying a limited protective search of the specific area associated with defendant’s suspicious behavior (see *People v Mundo,*99 NY2d 55, 57-59 [2002]). During a lawful traffic stop at a particular location known to police for significant drug activity and numerous recent shootings, the police saw defendant leaning down and reaching into an area below the center area of the dashboard. After a slight delay, defendant responded to the officers’ request for a license and registration by answering that he had those documents in his back pocket. Meanwhile, defendant continued to use his right leg to push against a lower compartment area beneath the dashboard, and he appeared to be nervous. After defendant got out of the van as directed, the totality of circumstances warranted the limited intrusion of shining a flashlight on the lower compartment area that defendant had been pushing with his right leg *(cf. People v Hardee,*126 AD3d 626, 628 [1st Dept 2015], *affd*30 NY3d 991 [2017] [“(D)efendant’s furtive behavior, suspicious actions in looking into the back seat on multiple occasions and refusal to follow the officers’ legitimate directions” justified the limited intrusion into the vehicle after the occupants had been removed and frisked]). As a result, an officer saw what he recognized to be a bag of drugs in the partly opened compartment.

Concur— Sweeny, J.R, Renwick, Kapnick, Kern and Moulton, JJ.