alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32693-32694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending June 5, 1998

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.

    Docket Number: OST-98-3895.
    Date Filed: June 1, 1998.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify 
Scope: June 29, 1998.
    Description: Application of Reliant Airlines, Inc. pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. Section 41102 and Subpart Q of the Regulations, applies for a 
certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing Reliant to 
conduct interstate charter air transportation of property and mail 
between points in the United States beginning on or about September 1, 
1998.

    Docket Number: OST-98-3896.
    Date Filed: June 1, 1998.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify 
Scope June 29, 1998.
    Description: Application of Reliant Airlines, Inc. pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. Section 41102 and Subpart Q of the

[[Page 32694]]

Regulations, applies for a certificate of public convenience and 
necessity authorizing Reliant to conduct foreign charter air 
transportation of property and mail between points in the United States 
and any point(s) outside the United States beginning on or about 
September 1, 1998.

    Docket Number: OST-98-3900.
    Date Filed: June 2, 1998.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify 
Scope: June 30, 1998.
    Description: Application of Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. pursuant to 
49 U.S.C. Section 41301 and Subpart Q of the Regulations, applies for 
an amendment to its foreign air carrier permit to engage in the foreign 
air transportation between any point or points behind the Republic of 
Korea and any point or points in the Republic of Korea, via any 
intermediate point or points, and any point or points in the United 
States, and beyond the United States to any point or points, with full 
traffic rights. KAL also requests that the amended permit authorize KAL 
to engage in charter foreign air transportation pursuant to, and with 
all other rights available to KAL under, the 1998 Agreement.
Dorothy W. Walker,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 98-15846 Filed 6-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 233

To authorize appropriations for the Civilian Community Corps Demonstration

Program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 27 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. BOREN (for himself, Mr. WOFFORD, Mr. SIMON, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr.

PRYOR, Mr. ROBB, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. REID,

and Mr. LEVIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Civilian Community

Corps Demonstration Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 195N of the National and

5 Community Service Act of 1990, as added by section

6 1092(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for

7 Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2522),

8 is amended—
2

•S 233 IS

1 (1) in the text of such section, by inserting ‘‘(b)

2 FUNDING LIMITATION.—’’ before ‘‘The Commis3 sion,’’;

4 (2) by inserting below the section heading the

5 following new subsection (a):

6 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—For fis7 cal years beginning after September 30, 1993, there is au8 thorized to be appropriated for the Civilian Community

9 Corps Demonstration Program established pursuant to

10 section 195A such sums as may be necessary to carry out

11 such program.’’; and

12 (3) by striking out the section heading and in13 serting in lieu thereof the following:

14 ‘‘SEC. 195N. FUNDING MATTERS.’’.

15 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The item relating to sec16 tion 195N in the table of contents in section 1(b) of the

17 National and Community Service Act of 1990 is amended

18 to read as follows:

‘‘195N. Funding matters.’’.

Æ
Presidential Documents

30099

Federal Register

Vol. 63, No. 106

Wednesday, June 3, 1998

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 7100 of May 29, 1998

Death of Barry M. Goldwater

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

As a mark of respect for the memory of Barry M. Goldwater, former Senator

from the State of Arizona, I hereby order, by the authority vested in me

as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America,

that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff upon all

public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and

on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia

and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions on

Wednesday, June 3, 1998. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at

half-staff on that day at all United States embassies, legations, consular

offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval

vessels and stations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth

day of May, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-eight,

and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 98–14903

Filed 6–2–98; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and twenty-second.

œ–
#### Martinez v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole

12/01/2015

655 MAL (2015)

Denied

No. 1134 CD 2015
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Southwest Bancorporation of Texas,
Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2002 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) the information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: February 25, 2003



                                            /s/ Paul B. Murphy, Jr.
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Paul B. Murphy, Jr.
                                            Director, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
No. 09-1500.

#### Charles Madu Momah, Petitioner v. Washington.

562 U.S. 837, 131 S. Ct. 160,

178 L. Ed. 2d 40,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5879.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.

Same case below, 167 Wash. 2d 140, 217 P.3d 321.
# DLA Troop Support welcomes new Indo-Pacific commander for a virtual visit

/ Published June 7, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support welcomed the new Troop Support Indo-Pacific commander to the organization during a two-day virtual visit June 3-4.

Navy Cmdr. Eric Decker met with Troop Support Acting Commander Richard Ellis, and leaders from each of the five supply chains and the operations and plans office. 

This new role, which he assumed on April 30, marks Decker’s return to DLA Troop Support. In November 2007, he reported to the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia as a joint contracting integrator. From August 2008 to March 2009, he completed a deployment with the DLA Support Team-Afghanistan as the Class 1 Expediter. 

“I really appreciate all of your time,” Decker said during a meeting with the Construction and Equipment supply chain. “It’s really valuable and helpful to learn, and it’s nice to hear some friendly old voices.”

Throughout his visit, Decker asked about various topics including medical sales, cyber security and supply chain interruptions. 

During his meeting with Subsistence, Decker asked about future conferences. He said he already visited with several produce companies, and he thinks that, “networking equals understanding requirements and capabilities.”

“Personal networking is invaluable in my mind,” he said. 

Decker’s previous assignment was with the Commander Pacific Fleet, where he served as the staff execution branch head for the N00F Fleet Comptroller.
# Meade site adds warehouse capacity

/ Published June 30, 2020
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
The Defense Logistics Agency’s property disposal site at Fort Meade, Maryland, recently added a 40,000 square foot warehouse as part of an expected three-part infrastructure improvement program.

“The additional space will allow our team to better support the warfighter by increasing our capacity to hold more property and streamline our internal warehouse property flow,” said Area Manager Steve Herb. 

Herb said the $2.1 million warehouse addition includes new racking and cages that meet current security protocols, a dedicated bulk storage capability, truck lanes and a new “dock leveler that includes a locking mechanism to mitigate trucks from pulling away while the ramp might still be down.”

“The old warehouse was insufficient to meet the requirements of our operations,” Herb said, noting that the expansion will allow for a more linear warehouse flow. “Property was always getting backed up into the aisles, making movement very difficult and causing space issues.”                 The new warehouse space is just the first part of a property improvement plan that includes material handling equipment storage and security fencing upgrades.                            200624-D-D0441-1235                            The new warehouse space is just the first part of a property improvement plan that includes material handling equipment storage and security fencing upgrades.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA photoVIRIN: 200624-D-D0441-1235

Site operations were unaffected by construction of the new warehouse space, but renovations to the old warehouse are expected to begin in July and last two months, producing a “slight impact” on site services. 

The second of three area development plan projects recently began, Herb said. The second improvement phase includes a new material handling equipment storage facility and improvements to the site’s security fencing. The third project remains in the design phase.

“The end result of this warehouse expansion process is beyond my expectations,” said Ben Waller, the director of DLA Disposition Services’ property disposal operations throughout Northeast U.S. “This project was dreamed and developed by Area Manager Steve Herb and his team. Their vision and plan reached fruition through the stellar efforts of our friends from DLA Disposition Services Operations Directorate and DLA Installation Management. Fort Meade has taken it to the next level and set a high bar for other sites to achieve.”

As a hub site for area satellite properties, DLA Disposition Services at Meade fills a critical geographical need for the agency. Its property disposal specialists and environmental protection experts serve dozens of military installations and tenant units at sites throughout the National Capital Region and its personnel regularly assist with the equipment divestiture efforts of strategically important commands in and around Washington, D.C.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Trevior Caine, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 636]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J.), rendered November 30, 2012, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant correctly contends that his purported waiver of the right to appeal is invalid, as it is not evident on the face of the record that the defendant understood the appeal waiver *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, as there was no evidence of innocence and he was not coerced into pleading guilty (see *People v Pelaez,*100 AD3d 803, 804 [2012]; *People v Caruso,*88 AD3d 809, 810 [2011]; *People v Miranda,*67 AD3d 709, 710 [2009]; *People v Smith,*54 AD3d 879, 880 [2008]; *People v Beasley,*50 AD3d 697, 697-698 [2008]; *People v Mann,*32 AD3d 865, 866 [2006]). Further, the record demonstrates that he pleaded guilty voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently (see *People v Fiumefreddo,*82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]).

The defendant did not preserve for appellate review the issue of the sufficiency of the plea allocution because he did not raise this specific ground in his motion to withdraw his plea (see *People v Rivera,*1 AD3d 385, 386 [2003]). In any event, this argument is without merit (see *People v Seeber,*4 NY3d 780, 781 [2005]; *People v Duncan,*78 AD3d 1193, 1193 [2010]; *People v Hronopoulos,*192 AD2d 720, 720 [1993]).

The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is *770based, in part, upon matter appearing on the record and, in part, on matter outside the record, and thus constitutes a “mixed claim” of ineffective assistance *(People v Maxwell,*89 AD3d 1108, 1109 [2011]). In this case, it is not evident from the matter appearing on the record that the defendant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Marryshow,*135 AD3d 964, 965 [2016]; *cf. People v Crump,*53 NY2d 824, 825 [1981]; *People v Brown,*45 NY2d 852 [1978]). Accordingly, a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing the defendant’s claim in its entirety *(see People v Marryshow,*135 AD3d at 965; *People v Maxwell,*89 AD3d at 1109; *cf. People v Maldonado,*116 AD3d 980 [2014]).

Dillon, J.P., Cohen, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF A BATEMENT

Appellate case name: J ustin Wayne Parris v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 0050 2

- CR

Trial court case number: 13 52699

Trial court: 338 th Judicial District Court of H a rri s County

On March 1 2 , 2015, this Court granted the pro se motion by the appellant, Justin Wayne Parris, for a second 45

- day extension to file his pro se response to his appointed
counsel ’s Anders brief

. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). In that Order, because the appellant claimed that the reporter’s record was incomplete and was missing any pre

- trial suppression motion hearing, this Court directed the trial clerk to file confirmation of delivery of the clerk’s record and to file any supplemental clerk’s or reporter’s records containing any pre

- trial suppression motion/hearing records or a certification that there are no such records . On March 18, 2015, the trial clerk filed a certification in this Court confirming that a copy of the clerk’s record had been delivered to appellant on January 23, 2015.
Appellant, acting pro se , has filed a thir d motion , dated April 2 4 , 2015, requesting

a final 30

- day extension of time to file his pro se Anders brief response , which was currently set at April 27, 2015, until after he receives the pre

- trial suppression motion hearing record

. After a preliminary review of the clerk’s re cords, although it appears that a motion to suppress was filed on July 17, 2012, in an earlier trial court cause number 1240104, that was later transferred into the current cause number, there is no indication
that the trial court ruled on the motion or he ld a suppression hearing. (C.R. at 150

- 52). Nevertheless, because this Court’s March 12, 2015 Order was directed only at the trial
clerk and it is unclear whether a suppression hearing was held, the Court sua sponte abates this appeal and orders the offic ial court reporter, or any substitute reporter

, to file a supplemental reporter’s record of the suppression motion hearing in trial court cause
number 1240104/1352699 , if any, or else f ile an information statement confirming that no such record was taken, within 1 5 days of the date of this order

.2

Th is appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s
active docket. Th is appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket aft e r a supplemental reporter’s record or information stat ement that complies with this Order is
filed with the Clerk of this Court. Accordingly, because the Court is abating this case, appellant’s deadline to file his pro se Anders response , which was set at April 27, 2015, is stayed until after reinstatement w hen this Court will consider appellant’s third motion for
an extension of time.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: M ay 7, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from consolidated
financial statements found on the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, March 31, 2000,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             565
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                        98
<INVENTORY>                                     16,029
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,675
<PP&E>                                          17,249
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,038
<BONDS>                                         14,001
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           107
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,554
<SALES>                                         12,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,423
<CGS>                                           10,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (669)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,004)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,004)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.09)



</TABLE>
No. 09-11290.

#### William John Mahan, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 872, 131 S. Ct. 173,

178 L. Ed. 2d 103,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6531.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 586 F.3d 1185. and 359 Fed. Appx. 743.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Wright, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 876]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McGann, J.), rendered March 13, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the *547third degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to give a missing witness charge. However, since the defendant waited until both sides rested at the close of evidence to request the charge, his request was untimely and thus properly denied *(see People v Gonzalez,*68 NY2d 424 [1986]; *People v Asphill,*208 AD2d 550 [1994]; *People v Woodford,*200 AD2d 644 [1994]; *People v Simmons,*188 AD2d 668, 669 [1992]; *People v Catoe,*181 AD2d 905 [1992]).

In any event, the defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing that the undercover police detective was in a position close enough to the transaction to offer material testimony about the seller’s identity, and that the detective’s testimony would not be cumulative *(see People v Kitching,*78 NY2d 532 [1991]; *People v Gonzalez, supra; People v O’Hara,*253 AD2d 560 [1998]). Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.

Leslie C. Abbott

Senior Attorney

1901 L Street, N.W.

– Suite 640

Washington, D.C. 20036

(202) 263

- 628 5

(202) 263

- 6291 Fax

Leslie.abbott @wnco.com

_______________________________________________________________________________

June 8 , 2012

Via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of AirTran Airways for Renewal of Exemption

Authority ( ATL/BWI

- CUN ) ; Dock et OST

- 20 05

- 21134

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that AirTran Airways (“AirTran”) has polled all carriers on

the service list attached to the above

- referenced Application

, and all carriers responded

that they have no objections. Accordingly, AirTran requests that the exemption authority

renewal specified in the A pplication be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________ Leslie C. Abbott

cc: Susan Kurland, DOT

Paul Gretch, DOT

Brian Hedberg, DOT

Brett Kruger, DOT

A ll parties on the Service List
No. 10-5121.

#### Genaro Campos, Petitioner v. James Conway, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility.

562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 244,

178 L. Ed. 2d 163,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6429,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department, denied.