alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ivan Benjamin, Also Known as Irvin Benjamin, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 659]

The defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered July 11, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), assault in the third degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Latella, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it *741was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The showup in the present case was confirmatory *(see People v Bazelias,*220 AD2d 443 [1995]; *People v Hewitt,*267 AD2d 326 [1999]; *People v Martindale,*202 AD2d 158 [1994]). Approximately one month after the robbery, a witness saw the defendant on the street. This identification occurred spontaneously without any police involvement. The witness immediately described both the defendant and his vehicle to the police, who then found the defendant in the vehicle less than 30 minutes later, a short distance away. The confirmatory showup which followed merely assured that the person being detained was in fact the person whom the witness had just identified. Accordingly, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony was properly denied.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., Luciano, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 4

- 00 135

- C R



### ____________________

CARL BATISTE

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 9th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 05

- 10

- 08801 CR

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court sentenced the appellant, Carl Batiste

, on March 6, 2014.

Batiste filed a notice of appeal on March 12, 2014, and he filed a motion for new

trial on April 7, 2014

. On May 13, 2014, the trial court signed an order granting a

new trial on punishment only. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.9(c). The order restored the

case to it s position after the appellant was found guilty. Id.

On August 20, 2014, t he State filed a motion to d ismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction. The appellant did not file a response to the State’s motion to2 dismiss. Because there is no final, appealable judgment, w e grant the State’s

motion and dismiss the appeal without prejudice

.

APPEAL DISMISS ED.

________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on September 23, 2014

Opinion Delivered September 24, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Decided February 16, 2017

#### DeCintio v Lawrence Hosp.

1st Dept: 138 AD3d 414

denied
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Demorest, ChiefExecutive Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of MOCON, Inc.

 
| Date:  May 17, 2010 |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
| /s/  Robert L. Demorest  |   |
| Robert  L. Demorest      |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

----
No. 10-5179.

#### Kushal Shah, fka Gerron Lindsey, Petitioner v. Delaware.

562 U.S. 908, 131 S. Ct. 254,

178 L. Ed. 2d 168,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7217.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Delaware denied.

Same case below, 992 A.2d 1237.
# Senior leadership synchronization focuses on the future of warfighter support

/ Published March 15, 2023
RICHMOND, Va, 
More than 30 senior leaders from Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Richmond and DLA Land and Maritime in Columbus, Ohio gathered in the DLA Aviation Operations Center (Bldg. 46) on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia March 8, to talk key focus areas.

The idea behind the meeting came about after Aviation military and civilian leadership conducted a Senior Leader Alignment and Commitment meeting on DSCR back in Nov. 2022. A key initiative from that meeting was improving upon the already strong relationship between Aviation and Land and Maritime. 

“We have a natural tie for the agency as we both work the Class IX supply chain,” said DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Sean Tyler.

Class IX are repair parts and components listed under the 10 categories of the military class of supply. Aviation and Land and Maritime are the major subordinate commands that work the Class IX supply chain for the agency.

Tyler and DLA Land and Maritime Commander Army Brig. Gen. Gail Atkins provided opening remarks before the group got down to business.

“The leadership that exists in this room does a great job linking their workforces to the warfighter. Though our acquisition strategies are different, and they must be because we have different customers, the point and importance of what we are saying needs to be aligned,” said Atkins.

Key topics discussed during the meeting included major strategic focus areas, including support to the DLA Nuclear Enterprise Support Office, as well as providing support to United States European Command headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany; requirement and execution prioritization alignment between major subordinate commands; retail support to DLA Aviation industrial support activities at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Ogden, Utah; San Diego, California, Jacksonville, Florida and Cherry Point, North Carolina and supply/demand chain issues.

Tyler said he was very pleased with the outcome of the engagement. 

“We were able to provide mission briefs for each organization, gain a great understanding of the focus areas, challenges, and collective opportunities we have to work together on class IX supplies to support the warfighter.”
No. 10-5516.

#### Randall R. Parker, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 926, 131 S. Ct. 312,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7201.

178 L. Ed. 2d 203,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 341 Fed. Appx. 122.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000068145
<NAME> MORGAN'S FOODS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-16-1998
<CASH>                                       3,129,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    358,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,615,000
<PP&E>                                      29,763,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,661,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,936,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,573,000
<BONDS>                                     15,043,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,290,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,320,000
<SALES>                                      9,606,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,606,000
<CGS>                                        5,342,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,170,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             331,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                127,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            116,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   116,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (GP Strategies Corporation, Common Stock, $.01 Par 
Value) File No. 1-7234

June 4, 1998.
    GP Strategies Corporation (``Company'') has filed an application 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and 
Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
Security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the Pacific 
Exchange, Inc. (``PXC'' or ``Exchange'').
    The reasons cited in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    The Security has been listed for trading on the PCX and, pursuant 
to a Registration Statement on Form 8-A which became effective March 
23, 1998, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''). Trading in the 
Security commenced on the NYSE on March 27, 1998, and concurrently 
therewith such Security was suspended from trading on the PCX.
    In making the decision to withdraw its Security from listing and 
registration on the PCX, the Company believes that the NYSE offers 
enhanced visibility and will enable the Company to further broaden its 
institutional shareholder base.
    By letter dated April 8, 1998, the PCX informed the Company that it 
had no objection to the withdrawal of the Company's Security from 
listing and registration on the PCX.
    By reason of Section 12(b) of the Act and the rules and regulations 
thereunder, the Company shall continue to be obligated to file reports 
with the Commission and the NYSE under Section 13 of the Act.
    Any interested person may, on or before June 25, 1998, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
Exchange and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15503 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
## Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

The State of Texas, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00136

- CR v.

David Colt Redus, Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of
Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 25051 ).
Opinion delivered by Chief J ustice Morriss,

Justice Carter and Justice Moseley
participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, The State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 27, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>
                                      
                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on 
Form S-8 of IWL Communications, Inc. of our report dated April 3, 1998, 
except as to the second paragraph of Note 1, which is as of May 7, 1998, 
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of IWL Communications, Inc. and 
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and June 30, 1997 and 1996 and the 
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash 
flows for the six months ended December 31, 1997 and for each of the years in 
the three-year period ended June 30, 1997 which report appears in the Form 
10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the transition 
period from July 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997.

                                            KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP 

Houston, Texas
June 22, 1998
#### In the Matter of Kathleen Marie Creamer, an Attorney.

[53 NYS3d 566]

Per Curiam.

Kathleen Marie Creamer was admitted to practice by this Court in 2004 and lists a business address in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with the Office of Court Administration. Creamer now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons *(see*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney.

As is noted by AGC, Creamer is presently delinquent in her New York attorney registration requirements, having failed to timely register for the 2016-2017 biennial period *(see*Judiciary Law § 468-a; *Matter of Turgeon,*148 AD3d 1458, 1459 [2017]; Rules of Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1). Inasmuch as Creamer is therefore subject to potential disciplinary action *(see*Judiciary Law § 468-a [5]; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 8.4 [d]; *see also Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a,*113 AD3d 1020, 1021 [2014]; *Matter of Arms,*251 AD2d 743, 743-744 [1998]; *Matter of Ryan,*238 AD2d 713, 713-714 [1997]; *Matter of Farley,*205 AD2d 874, 874-875 [1994]), she is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and her application must be denied *(see Matter of*
      *1612
      *Cluff,*148 AD3d 1346, 1346 [2017]; *Matter of Bomba,*146 AD3d 1226, 1226-1227 [2017]). Further, any future application by Creamer must be supported by proof of her full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (see *Matter of Frank,*146 AD3d 1228, 1228-1229 [2017]).

Garry, J.R, Rose, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that Kathleen Marie Creamer’s application for permission to resign is denied.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,



As Adopted Pursuant to



Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002





In connection
with the Annual Report of Hyperview Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Ronald S. McIntyre,Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1.	The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.	The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 19, 2012





|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald S. McIntyre                                       
|Name:                                                        
|Title:                                                       
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Qwest on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: January 12, 2004 |  |     |                                                                                            
|----------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | By: | /s/RICHARD C. NOTEBAERTRichard C. Notebaert
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|Dated: January 12, 2004 |  |     |                                                                                            
|                        |  | By: | /s/OREN G. SHAFFEROren G. Shaffer
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer                

---

QuickLinks
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 12, 2016

No. 04-16-00244-CV

SIG GROUP ENT. LLC,

Appellant

v.

MWJI, LLC,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-21171

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice 

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

On June 20, 2016, appellee filed a Motion to Dismiss Accelerated Appeal as Moot and 

appellant filed a response. The Motion to Dismiss is hereby CARRIED WITH THE APPEAL.

Appellee also filed an unopposed motion to extend time to file its brief. The motion is 

GRANTED and appellee is hereby ORDERED to file its brief no later than August 1, 2016.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of July, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         981,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,607,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (609,898)
<INVENTORY>                                    315,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,350,372
<PP&E>                                       9,303,465
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,574,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,974,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,362,441
<BONDS>                                      7,131,948
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       649,154
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,830,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,974,155
<SALES>                                     20,539,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,539,414
<CGS>                                       16,433,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,084,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,615,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,615,384)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,615,384)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
020406080100120140160180200

PPBDateMaximum1‐HrSO2atColumbiaMonitorMAXNote‐Alldatathrough6‐30‐2011hasbeenqualityassuredbytheStateofNewJersey