alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Delos Megacore Ltd., Appellant, v Omega Investments Ltd., Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 857]-

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered February 10, 2017 and February 13, 2017, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss or stay this action in favor of arbitration pending in London, and order, same court and Justice, entered March 15, 2017, which, to the extent appealable, denied plaintiffs motion to modify or, alternatively, for leave to renew, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly stayed this action in favor of pending arbitration, since the decision in the arbitration proceeding could dispose of the issues in this action *(see*CPLR 2201; *Doronin v Amanat,*133 AD3d 524 [1st Dept 2015]; *JP Foodser-vice Distribs. v PricewaterhouseCoopers,*291 AD2d 323 [1st Dept 2002]). In this action, plaintiff seeks to recover on a promissory note; at issue in the earlier commenced arbitration proceeding is the propriety of a subsequent agreement between the parties that includes a provision releasing defendant from its obligations under the note.

Contrary to plaintiff’s arguments, issues of arbitrability were properly resolved by the London arbitration tribunal pursuant to the law governing the tribunal; the parties’ subsequent agreement provided that English law would apply to any disputes arising under the agreement and would be addressed in arbitration in London in accordance with the rules of the London Maritime Arbitrators’ Association.

The purportedly “new” evidence that plaintiff submitted in its renewal motion was already before the court and, in any event, would not change the original determination *(see*CPLR 2221 [e]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Maz-zarelli and Gische, JJ.
No. 09-10685.

#### Roy Williams, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 849, 131 S. Ct. 98,

178 L. Ed. 2d 62,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6076,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Order entered June 2 6 , 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00877

- CR

MICHAEL GLEN GARZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th Ju dicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 31429



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s June 24, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file

appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or

before July 24, 2019. If appellant’s brief is not filed by July 24, 2019, this appeal may be abated

for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE 

INTEREST OF

B.S.R., A CHILD.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00188-CV

Appeal from the

383rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2011DCM10219)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We 

further order Appellant pay all costs of this appeal, and this decision be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2017.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       239,646,439
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             239,646,439
<CASH>                                       3,469,533
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             352,359,109
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            104,027,579
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       185,764
<OTHER-SE>                                 246,889,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               352,359,109
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          4,124,756
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (518,911)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 250,496
<BENEFITS>                                     319,666
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     24,014
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           116,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,190,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,190,809
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,190,809
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
Decided September 12, 2017

#### Dawn M., Matter of (Michael M.—Brendi M.)

3d Dept: 151 AD3d 1489

denied*
EXHIBIT 31.2RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002I, Russell Van Zandt certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Veridien Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth physical quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 2, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas H. Sinton, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ProBusiness Services,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

Date: September 30, 2002

                                                 /s/ THOMAS H. SINTON
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Thomas H. Sinton
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

I, Steven E. Klei, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ProBusiness Services,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

Date: September 30, 2002

                                                  /s/ STEVEN E. KLEI
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      Steven E. Klei
                                            Executive Vice President, Finance,
                                               and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Grupo Imsa, S.A. de C.V. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or § 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 30, 2005



|       |  |                             
|------ |  | ----------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Marcelo Canales Clariond
|Name:  |  | Marcelo Canales Clariond    
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer     



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 1088 Directorate ID : 2012 - SW - 005 - AD Helicopter Model: Robinson Helicopter Company Model R44 and R44 II Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 165 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended prevent the failure of the emergency floats to inflate during an emergency

landing. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $850 to $955 Labor per Helicopter ( 2.5 x $ 8 5 /work - hour for the replacement) $ 213 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $1,063 to $1,168 Total US Fleet Cost $ 175,395 to $192,720 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : I s the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Venessa Stiger
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000066052
<NAME>                        American Midland Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U. S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         6,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,000
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          464,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       57,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,322,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,690,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
# L_2011023EN.01005301.xml

| 27.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 23/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 23/53

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1261/2010 of 22 December 2010 imposing a provisional countervailing duty on imports of certain stainless steel bars originating in India

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 343 of 29 December 2010
  )

| 1. | On page 74, the table in Article 1 should be replaced by the following table:







  ‘Company | Duty (%) | TARIC additional code |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Chandan Steel Ltd, Mumbai | 3,4 | B002 |
| Venus Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai;
  Precision Metals, Mumbai;
  Hindustan Inox Ltd, Mumbai;
  Sieves Manufacturer India Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai | 3,3 | B003 |
| Viraj Profiles Vpl. Ltd, Thane | 4,3 | B004 |
| Companies listed in the Annex | 4,0 | B005 |
| All other companies | 4,3 | B999 ’ |

1.

On page 74, the table in Article 1 should be replaced by the following table:

‘Company

Duty (%)

TARIC additional code

Chandan Steel Ltd, Mumbai

3,4

B002

Venus Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai;

Precision Metals, Mumbai;

Hindustan Inox Ltd, Mumbai;

Sieves Manufacturer India Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai

3,3

B003

Viraj Profiles Vpl. Ltd, Thane

4,3

B004

Companies listed in the Annex

4,0

B005

All other companies

4,3

B999 ’

| 2. | On page 75, Annex, in the title of the table: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 75, Annex, in the title of the table:

for:

‘
  TARIC Additional Code AXXX
  ’,

read:

‘
  TARIC Additional Code B005

  ’.

---
**EXHIBIT 21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN DENTAL PARTNERS, INC.**

PDHC, Ltd., a Minnesota corporation 

Texas Dental Partners, L.P., a Texas limited partnership 

Texas DentalManagement, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

American Dental Partners of Wisconsin, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Louisiana, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Pennsylvania, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

Apple Park Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation

American Dental Partners of Ohio, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

American Dental Partners of Arizona, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Professional Services, LLC, a Delaware limitedliability company 

American Dental Partners of Virginia, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Maryland, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Alabama, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Oklahoma, LLC, a Delaware limitedliability company 

American Dental Partners of North Carolina, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of California, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

ADPof New York, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Tennessee, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

Voss Dental Lab, Inc., a New York corporation 

American Dental Partners ofMichigan, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Missouri, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Minnesota, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

ADP-CFK, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

Care for Kids – USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

Care for Kids of Arizona, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, d/b/a Arizona’s Tooth Doctor for Kids 

Edgewater Indemnity Company, a Vermont Corporation 

Metropolitan DentalHoldings, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Metropolitan Dental Management, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
HeinOnline -- 41 Fed. Reg. 28401 1976HeinOnline -- 41 Fed. Reg. 28402 1976HeinOnline -- 41 Fed. Reg. 28403 1976HeinOnline -- 41 Fed. Reg. 28404 1976HeinOnline -- 41 Fed. Reg. 28405 1976HeinOnline -- 41 Fed. Reg. 28406 1976HeinOnline -- 41 Fed. Reg. 28407 1976HeinOnline -- 41 Fed. Reg. 28408 1976HeinOnline -- 41 Fed. Reg. 28409 1976
Exhibit
15.7



CONSENT



We
hereby consent to the reference to our valuation of certain trading property of Plaza Centers N.V., as of December 31, 2016 and
the valuation of the Casa radio project as of December 31, 2015, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging
Ltd., and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report in the Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No.
333-194519) and in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-172122) and in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) of Elbit Imaging Ltd.



This
consent is not to be construed as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to be filed
under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



|/s/
    Jones Lang LaSalle Services SRL | 
|--------------------------------------- | 
|Jones
    Lang LaSalle Services SRL     | 
|                                        | 
|[Bucharest,
    Romania]                | 
|November
    8, 2017                    |
2017-1179.

#### In re Adoption of M.S.A.

Mercer App. No. 10-17-01, 2017-Ohio-5771. On appellees’ motion for declaration of frivolous action and for attorney’s fees. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., dissents.
# STATE OF LOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 

### 2022 KW 0557 VERSUS STANLEY JAMES BRUMFIELD 

### JULY 18, 2022

In Re: 

## Stanley James Brumfield, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, No. 

### 713, 585.
BEFORE: HOLDRIDGE, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. GH AHP WIL



### COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# 1.(;

# j DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
EXHIBIT 32.1certification pursuant to 18 u.s.c. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of thesarbanes-oxley act of 2002The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to my knowledgethat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification isprovided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or “filed” for anypurpose whatsoever.       Date: November 2, 2005 Name:    /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton             Sheldon C. Fenton    Title: Chief Executive Officer  
21