alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                             7,492
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             7,181
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  16,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       60,758
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            33,792
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              32,892
<LOANS>                                          199,988
<ALLOWANCE>                                        1,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   335,993
<DEPOSITS>                                       280,653
<SHORT-TERM>                                          85
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                2,444
<LONG-TERM>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             521
<OTHER-SE>                                        52,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   335,993
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    3,540
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  1,660
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     530
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   5,730
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 2,883
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,896
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              2,834
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                         50
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    1,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      951
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           595
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         595
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                      3.53
<LOANS-NON>                                          806
<LOANS-PAST>                                           0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   1,188
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        134
<RECOVERIES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  1,104
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               1,104
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-76620; and Form S-8 Nos. 333-85916, 333-63308,
333-52142, 333-80325, 333-37129) of our report dated July 26, 2002 (except for
Note 15 as to which the date is August 29, 2002), with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of ProBusiness Services, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2002.

                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Walnut Creek, California
September 30, 2002
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATE

I, Christopher T. Fraser, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2015 of KMG Chemicals, Inc.; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: December 15, 2015 |   | /s/ Christopher T. Fraser             |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Christopher T. Fraser                 |
|                    |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00330

- CV

T ARRANT C OUNTY

, T EXAS

, Appellant

V

.

J EFFREY D. L ERNER

, Appellee §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 141st District Court

of Tarrant County (141

- 307634

- 19)

January 9, 2020

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s order

. We reverse th at portion of the t rial court ’ s

Se ptember 12, 2019 order denying appellant Tarrant County , T exas ’ s p lea to the

jurisdiction and remand for entry of an order granting the plea and for further

proceedings consistent with this opinion

.

It is further ordered that all parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal, for

which let execution issue.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
# DLA Distribution Commanding General's Disability Awareness Month message

/ Published Oct. 12, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
National Disability Employment Awareness Month is observed during the month of October. The month-long observation is so Americans may reaffirm their commitment to ensuring equal opportunity for all citizens and to pay tribute to the accomplishments of men and women with disabilities who contribute to making the nation's economy strong.The theme of this year’s awareness month is America’s Recovery, Powered by Inclusion. Jennifer Sheehy, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Disability Employment Policy, explained the theme as “reflecting our commitment to an inclusive recovery, one in which those of us with disabilities have full access to economic opportunity and, if needed, the accommodations and support that allow us to contribute our skills and talents.”National Disability Employment Awareness Month is also an opportunity to reaffirm DoD’s commitment to recruit, retain, and advance individuals with disabilities throughout our workforce. People with disabilities span across age, ethnicity, sex, race, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status. It is a group anyone can become a member of at any time. As the Federal Government’s largest employer, DoD recognizes its critical role in advancing disability awareness in the workplace. The DoD understands that we are all equally important in protecting our nation and that we all have a role to play in mission readiness.DLA Distribution employs many hard working, talented employees with disabilities. This month, as we recognize the talent and skill of these employees, I’d like to acknowledge and thank the Americans with disabilities who work for DLA Distribution. Their resolve and determination strengthen our country and inspire us all.The DoD has an ongoing commitment to an inclusive Total Force, where qualified men and women of all walks of life can pursue their full potential. Together, we will continue to advance and promote an inclusive workforce in which everyone can provide for themselves and their families. Their achievements not only strengthen our economy and communities but also exemplify the power of every American to help shape the future of our country.
# Eisenhower School students visit DLA Aviation, learn how agency supports depot material availability

/ Published Feb. 18, 2020
Richmond, Va., 
Students from the Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy visited Defense Logistics Agency Aviation on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia Feb. 13 to interact with senior leaders and learn how DLA supports material availability at the military service depots.

Students from the school are a diverse group of senior military and civilian leaders from the military services, Defense Department, non-Defense Agencies and 38 partner nations. The school’s focus is to prepare students for national security challenges of the 21st century.

DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. David Sanford spent the morning with the students who are attending the school’s Organic Industry Base Seminar.

Sanford provided an overview of DLA and DLA Aviation, with focused discussions on DLA’s strategic plan, particularly the Warfighter First and Whole of Government lines of effort.

Sanford shared his thoughts that there are three types of logistics: reactive, proactive, and predictive, adding that he hopes to move more into predictive logistics.

Discussions continued between the students and the general covering a range of topics including the industrial base, supplier needs, demand and consumption, forecasting, military service requirements, additive manufacturing and the Defense Working Capital Fund.

Following the session with the general, students also had the opportunity to discuss military readiness with customer military service division chiefs within DLA Aviation’s Customer Operations Directorate, as well as commanders at DLA Aviation’s industrial support activities co-located with the Air Force Air Logistics Complexes and Navy Fleet Readiness Centers.

As a wrap up for the day, DLA Aviation directors from Supplier Operations Commodities and Original Equipment Manufacturer and Strategic Acquisitions Programs spoke with students about what drives DLA’s basic business, tactical and strategic procurement processes, and how the agency creates tailored logistics solutions to support our customers.
#### Rodgers v. W.C.A.B (Intern. Steel Group)113

12/28/2015

538 EAL (2015)

113

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied
Exhibit 32.2

In connection with the Annual Report of Bishop Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sherry
L. Moore, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Secretary of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Bishop Capital Corporation and will be retained by Bishop Capital
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

/s/  Sherry L. Moore
-----------------------------------
Sherry L. Moore
Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer and
Secretary

June 28, 2005
No. 10-5679.

#### Robert Smallwood, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 934, 131 S. Ct. 335,

178 L. Ed. 2d 218,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7141.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# R&D analyst honors ‘she-roes’ for Women’s History Month

/ Published March 30, 2023
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Hard work, determination, and support from family, friends and colleagues have allowed Danielle Williams to enjoy a successful career in DLA, and today she brings her experience to bear in an important Research & Development initiative.

Over the last 12 years, Williams tapped into her innate resilience to earn her bachelors and masters degrees while holding various positions in DLA, from a DLA Distribution warehouse material handler to a program analyst.

Williams is currently on a 12-month rotational assignment with DLA Research and Development as a program analyst. She supports the Strategic Distribution and Disposition program’s 5G Smart Warehouse efforts, including DLA Distributions’ 5G test site, augmented reality, virtual reality, and other robotic devices. Williams is also working closely with R&D’s newest program, Applied Research and Testing Emerging Technologies, to understand how their capabilities can enhance SDD’s 5G research.

“I chose R&D for my rotational assignment because it aligns with my current and previous experience, and I know this will set me up future success,” she explained.

Williams permanently serves as a distribution program management specialist with DLA Distribution in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, where she enjoys supporting organizational culture and Warehouse Management System training development.

Determination and clearly defined goals led Williams to a rewarding DLA career. Following a long career with Verizon, she knew a professional change was necessary as a wife and mother of three teenage boys.

“I reached a point in my life where I desired better work-life balance and the opportunity to give back to the country that has given me so much,” Williams said.

For Williams, Women’s History Month is a time to honor and celebrate the accomplishments of women who paved the way in history and those presently forging paths for the next generation. She encourages other women to pursue the ample opportunities that federal careers offer. She is an advocate for the higher education benefits, training, and professional development that DLA provides to help employees grow and thrive, while maintaining a healthy work-life balance.

Williams said she acknowledges that many “she-roes” helped and encouraged her throughout the years. She honors her mother, aunts, and many DLA managers and colleagues who guided and mentored her on her professional journey.

Williams is grateful for the extensive professional experience she’s gained at DLA including the opportunity to travel globally, train others, and engage with R&D over this next year, she said.

“DLA has really helped me grow professionally and personally to new heights I couldn’t have imagined,” she said.

To learn more about DLA R&D and the SDD program, please visit https://www.dla.mil/Information-Operations/Research-And-Development/.
Exhibit No. 12.

Questar Gas Company
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                12 Months Ended
                                                 March 31,
                                                    1997        1998
                                                (Dollars in Thousands)
<S>                                             <C>         <C>
Earnings

Income before income taxes                          $48,603     $39,920
Plus debt expense                                    16,707      19,903
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                       265         317
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 170         306
                                                    $65,745     $60,446

Fixed Charges

Debt expense                                        $16,707     $19,903
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                       265         317
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 170         306
                                                    $17,142     $20,526

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                     3.84        2.94
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

I, Leo Greenfield, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Distribution management Services, Inc., Inc. for the three months ended August 31, 2004;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably like to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 12, 2006



| |                                 
| | --------------------------------
| | /s/Leo Greenfield               
| | Leo Greenfield                  
| | CEO, principal executive officer
# L_2011094EN.01000101.xml

| 8.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 94/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 31 March 2011

establishing the position to be taken by the European Union within the International Sugar Council as regards the extension of the International Sugar Agreement 1992

(2011/223/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207, in conjunction with Article 218(9), thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas the International Sugar Agreement 1992, which was concluded on behalf of the Community by the Council through Decision 92/580/EEC (1), initially remained in force until 31 December 1995. Since then, it was regularly extended for successive periods of 2 years. It was last extended by a decision of the International Sugar Council of 28 May 2009 and it shall remain in force until 31 December 2011. A further extension is in the interest of the Union. The Commission, which represents the Union within the International Sugar Council, should therefore be authorised to vote in favour of such extension,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The position to be taken by the Union within the International Sugar Council shall be to vote in favour of the extension of the International Sugar Agreement 1992 for a further period of up to 2 years.

The Commission is hereby authorised to express this position within the International Sugar Council.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 31 March 2011.

For the Council

The President

VÖLNER P.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 379, 23.12.1992, p. 15.

1

---
No. 10-5166.

#### Michael Stevenson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 907, 131 S. Ct. 252,

178 L. Ed. 2d 167,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7444.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 989 A.2d 710.
163 A.3d 873

#### IN THE MATTER OF SANFORD F. SOLNY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 002411983)

July 7, 2017

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-079, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to *Rule*1:20-14(a)(4)(E), SANFORD F. SOL-NY of BROOKLYN, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months based on discipline imposed in the state of New York that in New Jersey constitutes violations of *RPC*8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation) and *RPC*8.4(d)(conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And SANFORD F. SOLNY having failed to appear on the Order directing him to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a prospective two-year term of suspension from practice is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that SANFORD F. SOLNY is suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years, effective immediately, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of *517
      *Rule*1:20—20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of *RPC*8.1(b) and *RPC*8.4(d); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to *Rule*1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.