alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# You can't fly without supply

/ Published Jan. 26, 2022
ALI AL SALEM AIR BASE, Kuwait, 
To help keep planes flying, the 61st Expeditionary Aircraft Maintenance Unit works 24/7 to deliver assets or parts that maintainers need to fix aircraft.Winning today’s fight means executing the air tasking order daily to meet the U.S. Central Command commander’s priorities. With aircraft flying daily, eventually parts will wear down or break, causing the aircraft to be grounded for several days.“What is the Air Force all about?” said Senior Master Sgt. Francisco Perez Colon, superintendent of the 61st EAMU who deployed here with his team from the 19th Airlift Wing in Little Rock, Arkansas. “Fly-Fight-Win, air superiority and power. Once you understand that, no matter what your job is, no matter what your rank is, it doesn't matter. We are here to execute the ATO.”Each aircraft part is identified by a national stock number in the supply system.“There's not much that we can't order,” said Staff Sgt. Devin Lawson, an aircraft and materiel management specialist also from the 19th Airlift Wing. “You'll be surprised. There’s even an NSN for toilet paper. There's NSNs for pretty much anything you can think of. So, if you ever find an NSN, I can probably order it.”Daily responsibilities of the members’ 12-hour shifts include checking email, meeting with the commander, ordering parts, receiving status updates on ordered parts and communicating with the maintainers to provide what they need.“You can't fly without supply,” said Lawson. “It's important to make sure the maintainers have the assets they need to fix that aircraft -- to get it back up in the air to complete the mission.”Perez Colon said it takes a combination of people and the mission to execute the ATO.There are 118 people and 16 different Air Force Specialty Codes that support eight C-130Js on base.Lawson feels empowered working as a member of the 61st EAMU because he can contribute to the mission.“It becomes important further on down to realize the impact that you do make, and even though it may be small, [the impact] can be big, because there's a ripple effect [from] what you do,” said Lawson.

*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing website.*
No. 09-1454.

No. 09-1478.

#### Bob Camreta, Petitioner v. Sarah Greene, Personally and as Next Friend of S. G., a Minor, and K. G., a Minor. James Alford, Deputy Sheriff, Deschutes County, Oregon, Petitioner v. Sarah Greene, Personally and as Next Friend of S. G., a Minor, et al.

562 U.S. 960, 131 S. Ct. 456,

178 L. Ed. 2d 285,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 8024.

October 12, 2010.

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.

Same cases below, 588 F.3d 1011.
No. 10-5127.

#### Ublester Violente Mundo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 905, 131 S. Ct. 245,

178 L. Ed. 2d 163,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6151.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cedric Kushner Promotions,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James DiLorenzo, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Cedric  Kushner  Promotions,  Inc.  and will be  retained by Cedric
Kushner Promotions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.




Date: November 18, 2004          /s/ James DiLorenzo
                                 -------------------
                              Name:  James DiLorenzo
                              Title: Executive Vice President
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 12.2
                                            REPORT OF PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                  1 Embankment Place
                                                  London

                        Report of Independent Accountants


To the Directors and Shareholders of
COLT Telecom Group plc

            In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the
related consolidated profit and loss accounts,  consolidated statements of total
recognised gains and losses, consolidated statements of cash flows, consolidated
reconciliations of changes in equity  shareholders'  funds and the related notes
listed in the index appearing under Item 18 on page 126, present fairly,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  position of COLT Telecom  Group plc and its
subsidiaries  at 31 December 2002 and 31 December 2001, and the results of their
operations  and their cash flows for the three years ended 31 December  2002, in
conformity with accounting  principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom.
In addition,  in our opinion,  the financial statement schedules appearing under
Item 18 on page 127 present fairly,  in all material  respects,  the information
set  forth  therein  when  read in  conjunction  with the  related  consolidated
financial   statements.   These  consolidated   financial   statements  are  the
responsibility of the Company's management;  our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these  consolidated  financial  statements  based on our  audits.  We
conducted our audits of these  consolidated  financial  statements in accordance
with  auditing  standards  generally  accepted in the United  States of America,
which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable  assurance
about whether the financial  statements  are free of material  misstatement.  An
audit includes examining,  on a test basis,  evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated  financial statements,  assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement  presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

            Accounting  principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom vary
in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.  The application of the latter would have affected
the  determination of the loss for the period for each of the three years in the
period  ended 31 December  2002 and the  determination  of equity  shareholders'
funds at 31 December  2002 and 2001 to the extent  summarized  in Note 25 to the
consolidated financial statements.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors
London
England

26 February 2002
No. 10-187.

#### Fougere Holcombe, Petitioner v. US Airways, Incorporated.

562 U.S. 896, 131 S. Ct. 343,

178 L. Ed. 2d 147,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6672.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*148Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 424.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1211

DONNIE ELLIS, Petitioner, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ARCH OF WEST VIRGINIA/AMHERST COAL COMPANY, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-273-BLA) Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 19, 2000 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donnie Ellis, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Jennifer U. Toth, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Mary Rich Maloy, JACKSON & KELLY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donnie Ellis seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Ellis v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs , No. 99-0273-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 26, 1999). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10-5262.

#### Efren Isanan, Petitioner v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 912, 131 S. Ct. 267,

178 L. Ed. 2d 176,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7438.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 367 Fed. Appx. 453.
# Aviation procurement analyst recognized as emerging leader within DOD 

/ Published June 20, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
Alicia Jackson, a supervisory procurement analyst with Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Procurement Process Support Directorate’s Training Division, recently graduated from the 2023 Defense Civilian Emerging Leader Program. The graduation took place at the National Center for Employee Development in Norman, Oklahoma, May 26.

DCELP is a Defense Department initiative offering a dynamic learning environment for entry-level and emerging federal leaders.

The program was broken up into four, one-week sessions held at the NCED between March and May. During this time, participants were immersed in a variety of experiential activities that promote self-awareness, enhance oral and written communication skills, share proven team building strategies and strengthen overall leadership capabilities.

“My goal for attending was to gain a more in-depth understanding of how to communicate with my team and senior leadership,” said Jackson.

Jackson was nominated to participate in the program by Sherry Mitchell, a supervisory procurement analyst and Jackson’s first line supervisor within the Procurement Process Support Directorate’s Training Division. Jackson was then selected at the DLA headquarters level to represent the agency enterprise-wide at the DCELP. 

“The overall experience attending the course was phenomenal. I was able to use the competencies learned to apply to real world scenarios. I was deliberate in utilizing the opportunity to build lasting relationships that will increase my leadership skills and ability,” said Jackson.

While going through the program, Jackson was awarded the Dr. Fiona J. Burdick Special Act Award. The award was created by DCELP and is a peer-nominated award for outstanding service, leadership and teamwork. It honors outstanding graduates of the program for above-and-beyond contributions to their peers.

Jackson also served as a featured speaker during the graduation ceremony.

“I am extremely proud of Alicia and not at all surprised by [the] success she receives. She represented herself and the organization in a stellar fashion. To see her continue to excel and hone her skills is remarkable and gratifying. I look forward to witnessing her continual upward trajectory,” said Mitchell.

As Jackson reflects on her DCELP experience, she said the program gave her the tools necessary to thrive in today’s government work environment.

“I feel empowered to be able to lead my team as well as share the information with others. The experience has allowed me the opportunity to reflect on the exercises and networking opportunities, to continue to foster an environment of learning and developmental progress,” she said.
No. 10-5555.

#### Johnnie Elijah Foster, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 928, 131 S. Ct. 318,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7412.

178 L. Ed. 2d 207,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 374 Fed. Appx. 448.
Prize Energy Resources, L.P., 

Co., Hunter Gas Gathering, 

Inc., Pat R. Rutherford Jr., 

Michael G. 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 27, 2015

No. 04-13-00201-CV

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. as Trustee of Bettye Baker Brown Trust, u/w, f/b/o William David 

Deiss, Bettye Baker Brown Trust u/w, f/b/o Diane Elizabeth Mysliweic, Bettye Baker Brown 

Trust u/w/, f/b/o Paula Jane Roberts, Dorothy Baker Shaw 1966 Trust, Baker E.,

Appellants

v.

PRIZE ENERGY RESOURCES, L.P., Prize Operating Company, Gruy Petroleum 

Management Company n/k/a Cimarex Energy Co. of Colorado, Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc., 

Cimarex Energy Co., Hunter Gas Gathering, Inc., Pat R. Rutherford Jr., Michael G. Rutherford, 

Rut,

Appellees

From the 343rd Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas

Trial Court No. M05-0002-CV-C

Honorable Michael E. Welborn, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-220-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-11019

Summary Calendar

JOSE MARTINEZ

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

WAL-MART STORES INC., doing business as Wal-Mart Store #371

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:95-CV-0216-BD)

April 7, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Appellant Martinez seeks reversal of the district court’s

grant of Appellee’s Motion For Judgment As A Matter of Law

dismissing Appellant’s claim for malicious prosecution. We affirm.

Appellant was accused by Wal-Mart’s loss prevention officer of

shoplifting and was arrested. Subsequently the charges were2

dropped and Appellant brought the instant suit under Texas law for

malicious prosecution. PA jury awarded compensatory and punitive

damages. After the jury returned its verdict for Martinez,

Appellee moved for judgment as a matter of law on the basis that

there was no evidence of lack of probable cause nor of malice. The

district court found no evidence of malice, an essential element of

the cause of action under Texas law and entered a take nothing

judgment against Appellant.

In this court Appellant does not contend that he has produced

direct evidence of malice but argues rather that malice can be

inferred from the facts which the jury apparently did find relating

to the lack of probable cause for the Appellant’s arrest. Our

review of the pertinent law and the record convinces us that the

district court was correct. There was not evidence from which the

jury could infer malice, even if Texas law allows such inference.

The cases cited by Appellant do not support the proposition he

espouses. Viewed in the light most favorable to Martinez, the best

that can be said for his cause is that the evidence showed

negligence on the part of the loss prevention officer.

AFFIRMED.
# DLA Installation Management Susquehanna’s Security & Emergency Services tip week #4: preparing for disasters at home

/ Published Sept. 20, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
In recognition of National Preparedness Month, Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Susquehanna’s Security & Emergency Services will provide helpful tips and resources focusing on hazard preparedness during the month of September.

Last week we talked about responding to disasters at work. But how do we deal with hazards at home? You should know the risk of disasters in the area you live and act fast if you receive a local warning or alert. 

Tips and links for disaster response at home below:

**Shelter-In-Place:**
      - Have a predesignating location in your house to provide shelter
      - Make a plan  https://www.ready.gov/plan 
      - Build a SIP kit  https://www.ready.gov/kit
      - Follow directions from emergency broadcasts and local emergency management officials 

**Evacuation:**
      - If you need to evacuate, prepare a “go kit” with personal items you cannot do without during an emergency. Include items that can help protect you and others from COVID-19, such as hand sanitizer, disinfectant wipes and two masks for each person
      - Know a safe place to shelter and have several ways to receive weather alerts
      - Find out if your local public shelter is open, in case you need to evacuate your home and go there. Your shelter location may be different this year due to the COVID-19 pandemic
      - Follow guidance from your local public health or emergency management officials on when and where to shelter
      - Make a plan and prepare a disaster kit for your pets. https://www.ready.gov/
      - Follow safety precautions when using transportation to evacuate. If you have to travel away from your community to evacuate, follow safety precautions for travelers to protect yourself and others from COVID-19
      - Contact your supervisor for accountability

Contact your local installation emergency manager about preparing for disasters in your community.
exv10w18



 





EXHIBIT 10.18


FORM OF RESTRICTED STOCK
AWARD


[Grant Date]




[Name]


[Address]




Dear [name]:




Effective [grant date] the Board of Directors awarded you the following
Restricted Stock at a grant value of [grant price] per share upon the terms set
forth below:




	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	Type of Grant:
	 	Restricted Stock
	

	 	Number of Shares:
	 	[number of shares]
	

	 	Vesting Schedule:
	 	     %      year(s) after the date of grant
	

	 	 	 	     %      year(s) after the date of grant
	

	 	 	 	     %      year(s) after the date of grant
	

	 	 	 	     %      year(s) after the date of grant







This Restricted Stock Award (this “Award”) has been granted pursuant to, and is
controlled by: (i) the Mindspeed 2003 Long-Term Incentives Plan (the “Plan”),
(ii) the Mindspeed 2003 Long-Term Incentives Plan Award Agreement Restricted
Stock Terms and Conditions (the “Plan Terms”), and (iii) this Award. This
Award shall vest as set forth above. The Plan and the Plan Terms are
incorporated into this Award as if fully set forth herein and together they
constitute one agreement.




In accordance with IRS regulations, you may choose to be taxed on the value of
the Restricted Stock at this time, by making a Section 83(b) election. PLEASE
NOTE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING A SECTION 83(b) ELECTION:





	Ÿ	 	The election form MUST BE FILED WITH THE COMPANY AND THE IRS NO
LATER THAN 30 days after the effective date of the grant.
	 
	Ÿ	 	The holding period begins on the grant date.
	 
	Ÿ	 	Withholding taxes MUST BE PAID to the Company at the time of the election.
	 
	Ÿ	 	Additional gain (or loss) is recognized when the stock is sold – not when the restriction lapses.
	 
	Ÿ	 	The 83(b) election form, tax calculator and administrative
procedures can be found on the Stock Administration web-site
described below.
	 
	Ÿ	 	Please consult your own tax advisor for your individual tax situation.




All documents relating to this award are available for viewing and printing on
the Human Resources Department Website. To access this information, please go
to MyNet, select Departments, Human Resources, Compensation, Stock
Administration. In addition to the 83(b) election information, the documents
available for viewing and printing at this website location are the Plan, the
Plan Terms, the most recent Company Prospectus, and the Company’s Insider
Trading Policy. If you choose not to download these documents, if you do not
have access MyNet, or if you encounter problems accessing this site, please
contact Stock Administration at (949) 579-4525 or stock.admin@mindspeed.com to
receive paper copies of these documents at no cost. Please read all documents
carefully.




If you have any questions regarding this grant, please contact Stock
Administration at (949) 579-4525.




Sincerely,




Bradley W. Yates

Senior Vice President,

Chief Administrative Officer
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2264

To provide for certain protections in the sale of a short line railroad, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. DORGAN (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. CONRAD, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr.

DECONCINI, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. KOHL, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. RIEGLE,

Mr. SIMON, Mr. WELLSTONE, and Mr. METZENBAUM) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To provide for certain protections in the sale of a short

line railroad, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT LINE CONSTRUCTION, ACQUISITION,

4 AND OPERATION.

5 Section 10901 of title 49, United States Code, is

6 amended—

7 (1) in subsection (c)—

8 (A) by redesignating paragraph (2) as

9 paragraph (3); and
2

S 2264 IS

1 (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the

2 following new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(2) The Commission shall, in any order approving

4 an application under this section, require a fair and equi5 table arrangement for protection of the interests of rail6 road employees who may be affected thereby no less pro7 tective of and beneficial to the interests of such employees

8 than those established pursuant to section 11347 of this

9 title.’’; and

10 (2) by striking subsection (e).

11 SEC. 2. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO AVOID ABANDONMENT

12 AND DISCONTINUANCE.

13 Section 10905 of title 49, United States Code, is

14 amended by adding at the end the following new sub15 section:

16 ‘‘(g) No sale or offer of financial assistance shall be

17 approved unless the Commission certifies a fair and equi18 table arrangement for the protection of the interests of

19 employees who may be affected by such approval no less

20 protective of and beneficial to the interests of such employ21 ees than those established pursuant to section 11347 of

22 this title.’’.

Æ