alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15


                                LEASE AGREEMENT
                                 ---------------


LANDLORD:               SALARI ENTERPRISE LTD.

ADDRESS OF PREMISE:     1080 Howe Street, Suite 501, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1P5

TENANT:                 CHEMOKINE THERAPEUTICS CORP.

TENANT'S ADDRESS:       2386 East Mall (UBC), Unit 208, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3

TERM:                   Five (5) years.

COMMENCEMENT DATE:      January 01, 2003

BASIC RENT:             $2,000 per month, plus GST ($2,000 + $140; total $2,140)


SCOPE OF ACTIVITY:      Biopharmaceutical business activity

PARKING PERMIT:         One (1) parking included in the price, (slot #11)

DEPOSIT:                One (1) month; $2,070

LANDLORD'S WORK:        Tenant is responsible for all the improvement costs.

RENEWAL TERM:           One (1) Option to Renew for a term of 1 year.

EARLY TERMINATION;      Tenant has the right to terminate the Lease at any time
prior to the end of the Term. However, Tenant is responsible for the full
payment of the remaining Lease from the date of early termination notice to the
end of the 5-year term.

The parties in consideration of the covenants and agreements in this Lease
contained, covenant and agree each with the other that the terms herein shall
form the Lease Agreement, and the parties shall be bound by the same. The Laws
of the Province of British Columbia govern this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Landlords, the Tenant have executed this Lease as of the
01st day of January 2003.

Landlord:                                         Tenant:
SALARI ENTERPRISES LTD.                           CHEMOKINE THERAPEUTICS CORP.

/s/ Hassan Salari                                 /s/ Walter Korz

Authorized Signatory                              Authorized Signatory
No. 10-5489.

#### Suman Mehta, Petitioner v. Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, et al.

562 U.S. 924, 131 S. Ct. 308,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7316.

178 L. Ed. 2d 200,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1963** 

In R e: CHARLES D. IZAC , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis and Writ of Mandamus
. ( 3:02

- cr - 00058

- JPB

- JES

- 1; 3:16

- cv - 00099

- JPB

- JES )

Submitted : December 9, 2016 Decided: December 21, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Charles D. Izac , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charles D. Izac petitions for a writ of error coram nobis and writ of m andamus seeking an order directing his immediate release from incarceration. We conclude that Izac is not entitled to coram nobis relief or mandamus relief.
To o btain coram nobis relief, the petitioner must show that a more usual remedy is unavailable ; there is a “valid basis” for
not having challenged his conviction earlier ; “ the consequences flowing to the petitioner from his convictions [are] sufficiently adver se to satisfy Article III’s case or controversy requirement ; ” and “the error
. . . must be of the most fundamental character.” Bereano v. United States , 706 F.3d 568, 57 6 (4th Cir. 2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). Mandamus relief is a drastic rem edy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U .S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass ’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)
. Izac’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion challenging his conviction and sentence is p ending in the district court. Therefore , t he relief sought by Izac is not available by way of coram nobis or mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to3 proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of error coram nobis and writ of m andamus. Additionally, we deny Izac’s motions for relief from judgment, for summary disposition, and for consideration of his petition by the en banc court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i n the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15838]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: United States Enrichment Corporation.

SUBJECT: Board of Directors.

TIME AND DATE: 8:00 a.m., Tuesday, June 26, 1998.

PLACE: USEC Corporate Headquarters, 6903 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20817.

STATUS: The Board meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Privatization of the Corporation.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Elizabeth Stuckle at (301) 564-3399.

    Dated: June 9, 1998.
William H. Timbers, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-15838 Filed 6-10-98; 12:52 pm]
BILLING CODE 8720-01-M
14--A 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

J. 

J. 

115 Nev. 21, 23, 973 P.2d 241, 242 (1999). Therefore, we conclude the 

district court did not err in denying the petition. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

cc: Hon. Doug Smith, District Judge 

Richard S. Haddad 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
2017-0320.

#### State v. Fairrow.

Montgomery App. No. 26936, 2017-Ohio-220.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2188

___________________________

Oscar Stilley

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

United States of America; Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons;

Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, DOJ-FBOP

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

J.A. Keller, Director, South Central Region DOJ-FBOP; C.V. Rivera, Warden,

Forrest City, Arkansas FBOP; Becky Clay, Warden, Oakdale, Louisiana FBOP;

Chester Torry, Trust Fund Supervisor, Forrest City Low; C. Glasow, Alternate

Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Forrest City Low; B. Hunt, Manager, Marianna

Housing Unit in Forrest City; Mosby, Lieutenant, SHU Forrest City

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena

 ____________

 Submitted: July 5, 2019

Filed: July 11, 2019

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________
PER CURIAM.

In this action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the Freedom of

Information Act, and the Administrative Procedures Act, Oscar Stilley appeals after

the district court1

denied some of his discovery requests, dismissed some of his

claims, and adversely granted summary judgment on his remaining claims. Upon

careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in its

discovery rulings, see Toben v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC, 751 F.3d 888,

895 (8th Cir. 2014) (noting that district courts have wide discretion in handling

discovery matters), and did not err in disposing of Stilley’s claims, see Kelly v. City

of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (explaining that a district court’s

dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is reviewed de novo); see

also Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (explaining that a district

court’s grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, and thatsummary judgment

is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the prevailing party is

entitled to judgment as a matter of law). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the recommended dispositions of the

Honorable Beth M. Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Arkansas.

-2-
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2406

_____________________________

JOHN J. BANKS,

Appellant,

v.

GAINESVILLE POLICE 

DEPARTMENT,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Robert K. Groeb, Judge.

May 14, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, NORDBY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

John J. Banks, pro se, Appellant.

Lee C. Libby, Assistant City Attorney, Gainesville, for Appellee.
No. 10-5511.

#### Gary Francis Lowry, et ux., Petitioners v. Yavapai County Board of Supervisors, et al.

562 U.S. 926, 131 S. Ct. 311,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7393.

178 L. Ed. 2d 203,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 362 Fed. Appx. 871.
# Hispanic Heritage Month Spotlight: Annette L. Silva

/ Published Oct. 8, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Hispanic Heritage Month is celebrated across the nation every year from Sept. 15 to Oct. 15. The 2021 HHM observance theme “Esperanza: A Celebration of Hispanic Heritage and Hope,” focuses on the Spanish name Esperanza, meaning hope or expectation. Throughout this month, we celebrate Hispanic heritage month by reflecting on the past contributions Hispanics have made and will continue to make in the future, recognizing that we are all stronger together.

DLA Distribution is honored to highlight Hispanic Americans who work daily to provide logistics support to America’s warfighters and other federal customers.

**My name is:**Annette L. Silva. I am the Public Affairs Specialist at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution San Joaquin, California**Describe your job in a sentence:**I maintain a favorable public image for DDJC and keep my internal and external customers up to date with factual information.**How long have you worked at DLA?**I have been with DLA for 15 years but have 30 years of federal service.**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?**My favorite thing about working for DLA is the opportunity to work with every organization across the installation as the public affairs representative.**What are your best memories of being in the DLA workforce?**My best memories is when an employee thanks me for writing about them and they are truly appreciative.**What is one thing you’d like others to know about your heritage?**We Hispanics place a strong value on family. My family means everything to me.**Why is it important to you that we celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month?**It is important that we not only celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month but every culture. Diversity is the key to an efficient and successful organization.
# Commanding General's National Black History Month Message

/ Published Feb. 12, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Each year, during the month of February, the Department of Defense joins the nation in honoring Black History Month, also known as National African American History Month. The month is an annual celebration of achievements by African Americans and a time for recognizing the central role they have played in our nation’s history. The story of Black History Month begins in 1915, half a century after the Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery in the United States. Few could have imagined African Americans’ future contributions to education that would be recognized by the global community.

Our EEO office did a phenomenal job of highlighting the achievements of African Americans in this month’s attached bulletin. The bulletin highlights the extraordinary efforts of African Americans in the military, including African Americans during the Civil War, African Americans In combat, and the first Black graduate of West Point. The bulletin also spotlights the achievements of Dr. Carter G. Woodson, known as “The Father of Black History.”

As we celebrate African American History Month, I’d like to ask that as you reflect on our nation's history and progress, you also recommit to advancing equal opportunity for all.

Mr. Knight and I would like to thank you for everything you do to support our Warfighters and our federal partners. Keep striving for excellence and look after one another. Stay safe!
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Allen Dodge, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K of Health
Grades, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment to the annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this amendment to the annual report.


Date: April 29, 2004

/s/ Allen Dodge
---------------
Senior Vice President - Finance/CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,303
<INVENTORY>                                     16,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,258
<PP&E>                                          37,803
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,112
<BONDS>                                        169,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (110,663)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,697
<SALES>                                         23,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,282
<CGS>                                           15,107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    553
<INCOME-TAX>                                       293
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       260
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### People v Holmes

1st Dept: 145 AD3d 641 (Bronx)

denied 3/13/17 (Abdus-Salaam, J.)
EXHIBIT 31.2RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002I, Russell Van Zandt certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Veridien Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth physical quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 14, 2006                     /s/ Russell Van Zandt                    Russell Van Zandt                   Chief Financial Officer  
22
Eisenhower students learn real-world impact of their studies through discussions with DLA
 
  By Natalie Skelton, DLA Aviation Public Affairs
  Defense Logistics Agency Aviation participated in a virtual seminar for the Organic Industrial Base class at National Defense University’s Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy on Feb. 4. This annual event brings together DLA leaders and students to connect what they learn with real-world impact.
“The OIB elective class has visited DLA Aviation for the past couple years to help their students understand how DLA Aviation supports the military services’ OIB,” said Army Col. Darren Buss, chief of the Army Customer Facing Division within DLA Aviation’s Customer Operations Directorate.
The NDU faculty intended to visit DLA Headquarters on Fort Belvoir, Virginia, to get the broader DLA perspective; however, they shifted to a pure virtual visit as a COVID-mitigation measure.
DLA Logistics Operations opened the session with a welcome brief and an overview of the agency’s missions and functions before moving into detailed coverage of how DLA Aviation supports the OIB.
Among the topics addressed were the DLA Aviation business model and its impact on customers, supply and demand chains and suppliers. This model, as described by Buss during the presentation, is driven by customer input.
Critical to the success of the business model is DLA Aviation’s ability to leverage a single level of inventory and streamline the supply processes to meet service depot production requirements. Simultaneously, it must eliminate redundant activities and inventories across the Defense  Department at specific service industrial locations.
The presentation also provided a side-by-side comparison of Air Force Air Logistics Complex and Navy Fleet Readiness Center functions, shared by Air Force Col. Brian Mayer, commander, Customer Operations Directorate, DLA Aviation at Warner Robins, Georgia and Navy Cmdr. Curtis Ceaser, commander, Customer Operations Directorate, DLA Aviation at Jacksonville, Florida.
While these groups have many of the same DLA job roles, certain job roles are unique to each branch of service. DLA Aviation ISAs supporting Navy FRCs have job-specific resolution specialists and quality assurance specialists, while Air Force ISAs supporting the ALC spread these functions among other specialists. While they both operate similarly, they are not identical in organization design.
Buss said the virtual visit helps the students with their research into how the DoD could redesign the OIB of the future to support readiness.
“DLA Aviation’s presentation and discussion allowed them to understand current procedures, initiatives and challenges  supplying, storing and distributing necessary materials in support of the military service OIB production schedules,” Buss said.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Corniel, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 605]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered February 24, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Renwick, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
2016-1782.

#### Williams v. Minute Men Select, Inc.

Tuscarawas App. Nos. 2016 AP 03 0016 and 2016 AP 04 0020. Appellant’s motion to consolidate denied as moot.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 12, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00058

- CR

Arthur Curtis THOMAS

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR5822

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

State ’ s brief is deemed timely filed as of August 11, 2014.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of August, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry Hicks, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 898]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered on or about March 4, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
#### Caetano, Matter of, v DiNapoli

3d Dept: 140 AD3d 1579

denied