alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND THE CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            2,193,317
<SECURITIES>                                      4,348,121
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,448,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                        162,000
<INVENTORY>                                       2,297,097
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 11,692,134
<PP&E>                                            3,067,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,869,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   18,341,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,759,380
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            628,817
<OTHER-SE>                                       14,861,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18,341,869
<SALES>                                           4,453,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4,453,723
<CGS>                                             1,519,149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,519,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,898,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,036,446
<INCOME-TAX>                                        342,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 694,446
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        694,446
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.11
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Breht T. Feigh,
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of American Dental Partners, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 which this certification accompanies fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) Information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|/s/ BREHT T. FEIGH                                                             
|Breht T. Feigh, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|March 10, 2006
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.  By: /s/ Gary C. Granoff Gary C. Granoff Chief Financial Officer and Chairman
November 19, 2008
# DLA Indo-Pacific employee receives NDTA award

/ Published Jan. 13, 2022
JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska, 
Bob Sherrill of Defense Logistics Agency Indo-Pacific was awarded the Joseph Torsani Award for Lifetime Service and Achievement from the National Defense Transportation Association in October. 

Sherrill serves as a warfighter support representative and Alaskan Command liaison officer at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, and is a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel.

The award, NDTA’s highest, was presented Oct. 20 during the NDTA fall meeting in Washington D.C. by retired Navy Vice Admiral Andy Brown, NDTA president and chief executive officer, and John Dietrich, chair of the NDTA board of directors.

Brown said Sherrill, who managed NDTA chapters in Florida, Alaska and Japan, helped the association accomplish its mission of ensuring a strong national defense. Sherrill thanked those who partnered with him in each of the NDTA locations he represented. 

According to the award citation, “Sherrill’s leadership and expertise, applied through numerous logistics and transportation positions held as a U.S. Air Force officer and as a government civilian with U.S. Central Command and DLA, have strengthened partnerships, and increased and improved our national readiness. His leadership resulted in winning several national and international awards for the NDTA Chapter of the Year and he was recognized individually for winning three NDTA Distinguished Service Awards.”
Opinion issued April 1 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 12 - 01117 - CR

——————————— LINDA DARNICE DORSEY , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1338492

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Linda Darnice Dorsey, pleaded guilty to the offense of murder. See T EX . P ENAL C ODE . A NN . § 19.02 (West 2011 ). After a hearing, the trial court found appellant guilty and sentenced her to life imprisonment

. See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 12.32(a) (West 2011 ). Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal.2

Appellant’s appointed counsel on appeal has filed a motion to withd raw, along with a brief stating that the record presents no reversible error and the appeal is without merit and is frivolous . See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Counsel’s brief meets the Anders requirements by presenting a pr ofessional evaluation of the record and supplying us with references to the record and legal authority. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; see also High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel indicates that he has thoro ughly reviewed the record and he is unable to advance any grounds of error that warrant reversal. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; Mitchell v. State , 193 S.W.3d 153, 155 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.). We have independently reviewed the entire record in this appeal, and we conclude that no reversible error exists in the record, there are no arguable grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400 (emphasizing that reviewing cour t

— and not counsel

— determines, after full examination of proceedings, whether appeal is wholly frivolous); Garner v. State , 300 S.W.3d 763, 767 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (reviewing court must determine whether arguable grounds for review exist); Bledsoe v. Sta te , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (same); Mitchell , 193 S.W.3d at 155 (reviewing court determines whether arguable grounds exist by reviewing entire record). We3

note that an appellant may challenge a holding that there are no arguable grou nds for appeal by filing a petition for discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe , 178 S.W.3d at 827 & n.6. We affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. * Attorney Kurt Wentz must immediat ely send appellant the required notice and file a copy of the notice with the Clerk of this Court. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 6.5(c). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

* Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal and that s he may, on her own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Ex Parte Wilson , 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997)

.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2078 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 648
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2078

 To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Old Spanish 
 Trail and the Northern Branch of the Old Spanish Trail for potential 
   inclusion into the National Trails System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 5 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

Mr. Campbell (for himself, Mr. Brown, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Reid, Mr. Bryan, 
Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Domenici, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mrs. Boxer) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                    on Energy and Natural Resources

           September 27 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

              Reported by Mr. Johnston, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Old Spanish 
 Trail and the Northern Branch of the Old Spanish Trail for potential 
   inclusion into the National Trails System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(36) The Old Spanish Trail, beginning in Santa Fe, New 
        Mexico, proceeding through Colorado and Utah, and ending in Los 
        Angeles, California, and the Northern Branch of the Old Spanish 
        Trail, beginning near Espanola, New Mexico, proceeding through 
        Colorado, and ending near Crescent Junction, Utah.''
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 648

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2078

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Old Spanish 
 Trail and the Northern Branch of the Old Spanish Trail for potential 
   inclusion into the National Trails System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 27 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                      Reported without amendment
```
# Cherry Point employees become certified life-savers

/ Published April 13, 2023
RICHMOND, Va., 
Close to 25 Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Cherry Point employees took part in basic first aid, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator training sessions conducted by an American Safety and Health Institute certified trainer at Fleet Readiness Center East on Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina Mar. 27, and Mar. 30.

DLA Aviation at Cherry Point Officer-in-Charge Navy Cmdr. David Odom said the reasoning behind offering the CPR/AED-familiarization course was due to a series of medical emergencies and related incidents at FRC East where response was impacted or delayed by a lack of CPR and AED trained employees.

Odom said the training was presented in multiple sessions to allow Aviation employees to schedule around mission essential tasks and everyone who participated became CPR/AED certified. 

Customer Support Specialist Devon LeCointe was one of those who attended the training and is now certified in life saving procedures. He works within DLA Aviation at Cherry Point’s Material Management Division.

He said he now feels better prepared to help in case a medical emergency arises in the workplace or at home.

“This was something I wanted to not only be able to help my coworkers, but also to be able to help my family as well,” he said.
No. 09-913.

#### Elvis David Lewis, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 826, 131 S. Ct. 65,

178 L. Ed. 2d 22,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6175.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 325 Fed. Appx. 178.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01



                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Macrovision Corporation:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-49390 and 333-49404) on Form S-8 of Macrovision Corporation of our
report dated February 20, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Macrovision Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and
the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December
31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Macrovision Corporation.

     Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that refers to the Company's
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets," on January 1, 2002.


                                                       /s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
March 28, 2003
No. 10-5768.

#### Michael Alvarez, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 937, 131 S. Ct. 344,

178 L. Ed. 2d 223,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7273.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 756.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Commission to Study Capital Budgeting; Meeting

AGENCY: Advisory Commission to the President of the United States.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The agenda for the next meetings of the Commission to Study 
Capital Budgeting includes discussions and hearing of testimony on 
capital budgeting issues on Friday, June 26. On Saturday morning, June 
27, the Commission will continue its discussions of different aspects 
of capital budgeting and discuss the next steps to be taken in 
preparation of its report. The Commission's final report on capital 
budgeting is due on December 13, 1998. Meetings are open to the public. 
Limited seating capacity is available.

Dates, Times and Places of the Next Commission Meetings

June 26, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    One New York Plaza, (Broad and Water Streets), The Annex, 43rd. 
Floor, New York, NY 10004
June 27, 1998, 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon
    One New York Plaza, (Broad and Water Streets), The Annex, 43rd. 
Floor, New York, NY 10004

    The Commission is seeking all views on capital budgeting. 
Interested parties may submit their views to: Dick Emery, Executive 
Director, President's Commission to Study Capital Budgeting, Old 
Executive Office Building (Room 258), Washington, DC 20503, Voice: 
(202) 395-4630, Fax: (202) 395-6170, E-Mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#781b1908110c191427271a0d1c1f1d0c3817151a561d1708561f170e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4b7b5a4bda0b5b88b8bb6a1b0b3b1a094bbb9b6fab1bba4fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>, Website: <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/
OMB/PCSCB/">http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/
OMB/PCSCB/</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: E. William Dinkelacker, Ph.D., 
Designated Federal Official, Room 4456 Main Treasury, Washington, DC 
20220, Voice: (202) 622-1285, Fax: (202) 622-1294, E-Mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e3948a8f8f8a828ecd878a8d88868f8280888691a39791868290cd9093918a8d97cd808c8e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27504e4b4b4e464a09434e494c424b46444c4255675355424654095457554e49530944484a">[email protected]</span></a>
Angel E. Ray,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-15651 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. PR94-3-011]


KansOk Partnership; Notice of Report of Refunds

May 28, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 8, 1998, KansOk Partnership (KansOk) 
tendered for filing a refund report reflecting additional amounts 
refunded to its customers on May 8, 1998, in compliance with a 
Commission Order dated April 23, 1998, in Docket No. PR94-3-002.
    KansOk states that during a recent review of its records, it was 
discovered that not all shippers on the system were affiliates of 
KansOk, and that Kansas Gas Service Company (Kansas Gas Service) was 
actually the shipper on the KansOk system for one-half of the quantity 
of its gas shipped on KansOk between December 1, 1993, and August 1, 
1997. KansOk states that it also discovered that Kansas Gas Service has 
been the shipper for all of its gas shipped on KansOk from August 1, 
1998, to the present.
    Pursuant to the April 23 order and this newly discovered 
information, KansOk states that it has adjusted refunds accordingly 
resulting in an additional $420,185.74 refunded to its customers.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before June 4, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14638 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 32.1****Certifications Under Section 906**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of AMICAS,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,that:     The Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Stephen N. Kahane, M.D., M.S. March 16, 2007     Stephen N. Kahane, M.D., M.S. Date  Chief Executive Officer         /s/ Joseph D. Hill March 16, 2007     Joseph D. Hill Date  Chief Financial Officer       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
#### Patricia Ann Saladino, Appellant, v 7th Avenue and Grove Street Corp. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[767 NYS2d 615]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered August 14, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion and cross motion of defendants 7th Avenue and Grove Street Corp. and Linda Libock for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion and cross motion denied, the complaint reinstated as against the movants, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Contrary to the finding of the motion court, the deposition testimony of plaintiff and her friend, as well as the photographs of the darkened nightclub stairway on which plaintiff fell, sufficiently raise questions of fact regarding plaintiffs claim that she fell because of a “missing” step to warrant the denial of summary judgment to movants. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Williams, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132154 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

LARRY REAUME, as Next Friend of Maura D. Corrigan 

Matthew Patrick Reaume, a Minor, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v SC: 132154 

 COA: 268071 

Monroe CC: 03-016704-NO 

JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL, 

Defendant, 

and 

RYAN NADEAU,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On April 11, 2007, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to 

appeal the August 15, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the 

application is again considered. MCR 7.302(G)(1). In lieu of granting leave to appeal, 

we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the 

Monroe Circuit Court for entry of summary disposition in favor of defendant Ryan 

Nadeau. Even accepting as true the allegation that the defendant, without warning, 

grabbed the plaintiff from behind and took him to the wrestling mat, this did not produce 

the injury to the plaintiff. The injury occurred while the defendant and the plaintiff were 

engaged in wrestling activity. The plaintiff testified that after a completed body roll, he 

did what he had been taught to do — brace his arm to attempt an escape — and only then 

did the injury occur. The defendant’s alleged failure to give adequate notice of the initial 

takedown, utilized by the Court of Appeals as the basis to affirm the denial of summary 

disposition, was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury. Robinson v City of 

Detroit, 462 Mich 439 (2000). See also Ritchie-Gamester v Berkley, 461 Mich 73 

(1999). 

CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal. 

WEAVER and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

t0417 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 20, 2007 

Clerk
*March 31, 2017*

2017-Ohio-1176.]

#### In re Lewis.

On motion for leave to lift vexatious-litigator sanctions. Motion denied.