alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Službeni list L 42/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0847
  doi:10.3000/19770847.L_2014.042.hrv |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | L 42 |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Zakonodavstvo | Svezak 57.12. veljače 2014. |

ISSN 1977-0847

doi:10.3000/19770847.L_2014.042.hrv

Službeni list

Europske unije

L 42

Hrvatsko izdanje

Zakonodavstvo

Svezak 57.12. veljače 2014.

---

| Sadržaj | | II.   Nezakonodavni akti | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | AKTI KOJE DONOSE TIJELA STVORENA MEĐUNARODNIM SPORAZUMIMA |
| | * | Pravilnik br. 43 Gospodarske komisije Ujedinjenih naroda za Europu (UN/ECE) | 1 |

Sadržaj

II.   Nezakonodavni akti

Stranica

AKTI KOJE DONOSE TIJELA STVORENA MEĐUNARODNIM SPORAZUMIMA

*

Pravilnik br. 43 Gospodarske komisije Ujedinjenih naroda za Europu (UN/ECE)

1

| HR | Akti čiji su naslovi tiskani običnim slovima su oni koji se odnose na svakodnevno upravljanje poljoprivrednim pitanjima, a općenito vrijede ograničeno razdoblje.
  Naslovi svih drugih akata tiskani su masnim slovima, a prethodi im zvjezdica. |
| --- | --- |

HR

Akti čiji su naslovi tiskani običnim slovima su oni koji se odnose na svakodnevno upravljanje poljoprivrednim pitanjima, a općenito vrijede ograničeno razdoblje.

Naslovi svih drugih akata tiskani su masnim slovima, a prethodi im zvjezdica.

---

II. Nezakonodavni akti

AKTI KOJE DONOSE TIJELA STVORENA MEĐUNARODNIM SPORAZUMIMA

| 12.2.2014 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | L 42/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2014

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

L 42/1

---

Pravilnik br. 43 Gospodarske komisije Ujedinjenih naroda za Europu (UN/ECE)

Ovaj će dokument biti objavljen u posebnom izdanju Službenog lista Europske unije na hrvatskom jeziku ako zadovolji potrebne uvjete.

---
Exhibit        10.3

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements        of Elbit Systems Ltd. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-9354 and 333-139512) pertaining to the        employees stock option plan of our report dated March 5, 2008, with respect to the        financial statements of Tadiran Electronic Systems Ltd. included in this Annual Report on        Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

| By: | /s/ Brightman Almagor & Co. |
|-----|---------------------------------|

Brightman Almagor & Co.

A member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

 

 

May 27,        2008
No. 10M12.

#### Jack Vigliotti, Petitioner v. T. Daly, et al.

562 U.S. 819, 131 S. Ct. 374,

178 L. Ed. 2d 11,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6420.

October 4, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.3



                              POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned hereby appoints Robert T. Slezak as his agent and
attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form
10-K relating to the year ending September 25, 1998, and any amendments
thereto, required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
Ameritrade Holding Corporation.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the 24th day of November, 1998.





/s/ Charles L. Marinaccio
-------------------------
Charles L. Marinaccio, Director
# Safety officials recommend tips for avoiding holiday-related hazards

/ Published Nov. 27, 2019
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
Traveling, decorating, cooking and giving are all part of the holiday season, and taking basic precautions will help keep family and friends safe and injury-free.

In 2017, 463 people died on Thanksgiving Day, 299 on Christmas Day and 329 on New Year’s Day, according to the National Safety Council. Alcohol was involved in about one-third of the fatalities. To stay safe on the roads:
      - Prepare your car for winter and keep an emergency preparedness kit;
      - Avoid driving drowsy;
      - Ensure every person in the vehicle is properly buckled up;
      - Put the cell phone away;
      - Practice defensive driving; and
      - Designate a sober driver after holiday parties.

While decorating is a good way to get in the holiday spirit, thousands of people are seen in emergency rooms each year for décor-related injuries. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recommends these steps:
      - Place candles where they can’t be knocked down and out of children’s reach;
      - Keep potentially poisonous plants like mistletoe, holly berries and amaryllis away from children;
      - Use artificial trees that are fire resistant;
      - If using a live tree, cut off about 2 inches of the trunk to expose fresh wood for better water absorption and remember to water it;
      - Place the tree at least 3 feet away from fireplaces, radiators and other heat sources;
      - Avoid placing breakable ornaments or those with small parts on lower tree branches where children can reach them;
      - Use indoor and outdoor lights in the appropriate locations and choose the right ladder for hanging them;
      - Replace light sets that have broken or cracked sockets, frayed or bare wires, or loose connections; and
      - Turn off all lights and decorations when going to bed or leaving the house.

The National Safety Council also reported that more than a quarter of a million children were seriously injured in toy-related incidents in 2017. To avoid safety hazards:
      - Choose toys in the correct age range;
      - Choose toys for children under 3 that don’t have small parts, which could be choking hazards;
      - For children under 10, avoid toys that must be plugged into an electrical outlet; and
      - Include appropriate safety gear when giving scooters or other riding toys.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services offers these tips for safe food handling:
      - Wash your hands frequently when handling food;
      - Keep raw meat away from fresh produce;
      - Use separate cutting boards and utensils for uncooked and cooked meats;
      - Use a thermometer to make sure meat is cooked to a safe temperature; and
      - Refrigerate leftover food within two hours of being served.

More seasonal safety tips are available at www.nsc.org.
159 A.3d 883

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JASON A. LEONARD, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 1, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
No. 12-663.

#### Ebonie S., by Her Mother and Next Friend, Mary S. *v.*Pueblo School District 60 et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darren Murray, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 297]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy L. Kahn, J.), rendered May 22, 2015, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of four years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict, which rejected defendant’s agency defense, was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). Moreover, there was overwhelming evidence “that defendant acted as a steerer whose duties included escorting customers to the place of the sale, and there was no evidence suggesting that he was doing a risky ‘favor’ for a total stranger” *(People v Gonzalez,*145 AD3d 586, 587 [1st Dept 2016]).

*650In the course of attempting to place in evidence the lone drug conviction that the court had allowed to be elicited to refute the agency defense, the prosecutor improperly displayed a voluminous document and referred to it as defendant’s rap sheet. However, the error was harmless in light of the trial court’s ameliorative actions and overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The court providently exercised its discretion in permitting expert testimony on the possible meanings of text messages between defendant and the seller. Defendant’s specific claim that this testimony usurped the jury’s role is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. In any event, the testimony was admissible because the communications were primarily conducted in street language beyond the knowledge of the typical juror *(see People v. Williams,*146 AD3d 410 [1st Dept 2017]), and the defects identified by the Court of Appeals in *People v Inoa*(25 NY3d 466, 474 [2015]) were not present. In any event, any prejudice was minimized by the court’s limiting instructions *(see People v Brown,*97 NY2d 500, 506 [2002]), and any error was harmless, given the overwhelming evidence.

Defendant expressly waived his claim regarding the events surrounding the taking of the verdict, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan’s Foods, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and wehave:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisreport (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisannual report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, includingany corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.        Date: September 29, 2004 /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir       Leonard R. Stein-Sapir       Chairman of the Board,
arraguirre

NRS 34.330; Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558. Generally, an appeal is an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.

Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted at this time. NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, J.

cc: Hon. David R. Gamble, Senior Judge Schuering Zimmerman & Doyle LLP Mandelbaum, Ellerton & Kolkoski Matthew L. Sharp, Ltd. Stephen H. Osborne Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) I947A 41140
# Missouri sheriff stays prepared with surplus 

/ Published Aug. 25, 2019
OSAGE COUNTY, Missouri, 
Missouri’s Osage County Sheriff uses DLA’s Law Enforcement Support Office to keep his county ready to respond to natural disasters that put citizens at risk.  

Michael Bonham has been sheriff there for the past three years. He has seen equipment acquired from the Congressionally-authorized “1033 program” used to apprehend suspects, conduct search and rescue and help people during natural disasters.

This past spring, when local rivers overflowed their banks, Bonham and his department put their 24-foot, former Coast Guard boat to work.

“We secured it because it’s the perfect piece of equipment for the rivers – we have 150 miles of shoreline, with the Missouri River, the Osage River and the Gasconade River running through our county,” Bonham said.

The craft allowed them to patrol swollen rivers looking for people unable to contact any first responders but in need of help. They also checked on infrastructure, including dams and bridges, giving them early insight on what the recovery was going to entail.

He said that this is the first time the county has had a marine response program. Building it took more than just putting a boat on the water and heading out.

Bonham said the department had to create policies and get training to ensure safe operations. Policies included having flotation devices on board, which were also acquired through LESO.   

For the smaller waterways, Bonham said the department picked up rubber rafts from DLA that will allow officers to cover even more territory.

When the rivers are flowing at normal levels, the former Coast Guard craft is used for regular patrols of the rivers. Bonham said the boat’s presence will help reduce criminal activity on the water.

His department has also acquired other equipment, such as trucks and ATVs for land-based search and rescues and apprehensions.

Two large former Army tents have also come to the department from the program, in case they are needed one day to house displaced people.

It’s all about being prepared.

 “Our area is very prone to flooding and tornados,” Bonham said. “We look way beyond the box and the scope of what normal operations are and incorporate the equipment from the program which the county in no way, shape or form would ever be able to afford.”
February 8, 2012 

William K. Honker, P.E. 

Acting Director, 

Water Quality Protection Division 

USEPA, Region 6 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

RE: C20110559, Coastal Zone Consistency 

USEPA 

Direct Federal Action 

NPDES Vessel General Permit and Small Vessel General Permit for discharges 

incidental to the normal operation of vessels, Offshore Louisiana. 

Dear Mr. Honker: 

The above referenced project has been reviewed for consistency with the approved Louisiana 

Coastal Resource Program (LCRP) as required by Section 307 of the Coastal Zone Management 

Act of 1972, as amended. The project, as proposed in the application, is consistent with the 

LCRP. If you have any questions concerning this determination, please contact Brian Marcks of 

the Consistency Section at (225) 342-7939 or 1-800-267-4019. 

Sincerely, 

Keith Lovell 

Administrator 

Interagency Affairs/Field Services Division 

KOUJDH/bgm 

cc: Pete Serio, COE-NOD 

Jamie Phillippe, LDEQ 

Dave Butler, LDWF 

Mick Tamara, USEPA, Dallas 

Post Office Box 44487 • Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-4487 

617 North Third Street • 1Oth Floor • Suite 1078 • Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802 

(225) 342-7591 • Fax (225) 342-9439 • 

An Equal Opportunity Employer
# Women’s History Month Spotlight: Vivian d’Alelio

/ Published March 9, 2020
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
*Editor’s note: The Defense Logistics Agency recognizes March as Women’s History Month. In honor of women’s contributions to the agency’s global mission, DLA is highlighting female employees who work day in and day out to provide logistics support to America’s warfighters.*

**My name is:** Vivian d’Alelio

**I am:** A management assistant in DLA Installation Management’s Multimedia Division

**Describe your job in a sentence:** I make sure the office runs smoothly, assist customers with questions and help with small graphics jobs.

**How long have you worked at DLA?** 11 years

**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?** My graphics teammates. We have so much fun while making sure the mission gets done. I also really enjoy all of the lasting relationships I’ve made with my DLA teammates, whether here at the Headquarters or another site.

**What are your best memories of working here?**I was 22, working in my very first professional job and at my first DLA Family Day – I couldn’t believe all the fun activities we were able to do during work. Also, running the Frosty Bear 5K with my friend Laura who was my “backup engine” when my arms got tired of pushing the wheelchair. Finally, I was asked to speak at an Installation Management town hall on behalf of DLA’s Equal Opportunity Office special emphasis program people with disabilities subcommittee, and share my DLA journey as a person with a disability.

**How do you make a difference?**Throughout my DLA career in the administrative field, I’ve been in a few different offices. Although it’s been challenging at times, my favorite part is being able to bring a smile to people’s faces and make their work environment and jobs easier by helping out wherever I can. I’ll never forget when I was moving from one office to another, a co-worker said she was really sorry to see me go because I brought the sunshine to their group. I make a point to say “hi” or “good morning” to everyone who walks by, no matter if they’re on the janitorial staff or in Senior Executive Service positions. My family taught me that no human is beneath or above another; that we are all equal. I hope to move up in my career, whether here in multimedia or within the cybersecurity field, but I never want to lose sight of this valuable lesson. 

**What does Women’s History Month mean to you?** When I reflect on Women’s History Month, I think of all we have overcome, whether it’s the women’s suffrage movement or the right to work with equal pay. Then I ponder how lucky I am as woman who lives in the United States to have the freedoms that not all women have across the globe.
#### Pacy v Cowen Holdings, Inc.

4th Dept: 148 AD3d 1747

denied
#### Anthony Gonzalez et al., Respondents, v Paramount Group, Inc., Defendant, and Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 122]

*428Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jennifer G. Schechter, J.), entered April 24, 2017, which to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment as to liability on their Labor Law § 240 (1) claim against defendant Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff Anthony Gonzalez was injured when, while making an opening in a concrete wall for HVAC ductwork to be installed, cinderblocks above the opening fell and struck his knee. Contrary to Allianz’s argument, the cinderblocks above the opening that fell were “falling objects” under Labor Law § 240 (1) required to be secured for the purposes of the undertaking *(Outar v City of New York,*5 NY3d 731, 732 [2005]; *see Czajkowski v City of New York,*126 AD3d 543 [1st Dept 2015]; *see also Stawski v Pasternack, Popish & Reif P.C.,*54 AD3d 619 [1st Dept 2008]).

Allianz failed to raise a triable issue of fact warranting denial of plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. As Supreme Court correctly indicated, the testimony and expert opinion that a safety device was neither necessary nor customary “is insufficient to establish the absence of a Labor Law § 240 (1) violation” *(Bonaerge v Leighton House Condominium,*134 AD3d 648, 649 [1st Dept 2015]). *O’Brien v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.*(29 NY3d 27 [2017]) is not to the contrary. Unlike in *O’Brien,*the experts here do not differ as to whether a safety device that was provided was adequate, but rather differ as to whether a safety device was required at all (see *Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts,*65 NY2d 513 [1985]). In light of the uncontroverted fact that no safety devices were provided, it would be error to submit to the jury for their resolution the conflicting expert opinion as to what safety devices, if any, should have been employed *(O’Brien*at 34).

We have considered Allianz’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Tom, Kapnick, Kern and Moulton, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2285** 

JOSEPH KIRZHNER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. PUREPOWER TECHNOLOGIES LLC , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Margaret B. Seymour , Senior District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 01802

- MBS )

Submitted : March 31, 2014 Decided: April 15, 2014

Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Joseph Kirzhner, Appellant Pro Se. Jade Cobb Murray, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Kirzhner appeals the district court ’ s order acceptin g the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to PurePOWER Technologies LLC on his complaint asserting violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (West 2006 & Supp. 201 3) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kirzhner v. PurePOWER Technologies LLC , No. 3:12

- cv - 01802

- MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument bec ause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Com. v. Dejesus

12/10/2015

650 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 95
No. 09-11161.

#### Daniel Deron Johnson, Petitioner v. Billy Mitchem, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 865, 131 S. Ct. 149,

178 L. Ed. 2d 90,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6558.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.