alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                          EXHIBIT 12


                                                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST I
                                                                MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING I, L.P.
                                                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                          (dollars in thousands)



                                   FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                    DECEMBER 29, 2000                  DECEMBER 31, 1999                  DECEMBER 25, 1998
                           ---------------------------------    --------------------------------   ---------------------------------
                            MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                              PREFERRED         PREFERRED          PREFERRED        PREFERRED         PREFERRED        PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST I   FUNDING I, L.P.    CAPITAL TRUST I  FUNDING I, L.P.   CAPITAL TRUST I   FUNDING I, L.P.
                           ---------------   ---------------    ---------------  ---------------   ---------------   ---------------

<S>                             <C>                <C>            <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>

Earnings                          $ 21,972          $ 25,781           $ 21,972         $ 25,745          $ 21,972          $ 25,782
                                  ========          ========           ========         ========          ========          ========


Fixed charges                     $      -          $      -           $      -         $      -          $      -          $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution requirements          21,313            21,972             21,313           21,972            21,313            21,972
                                  --------          --------           --------         --------          --------          --------

Total combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements        $ 21,313          $ 21,972           $ 21,313         $ 21,972          $ 21,313          $ 21,972
                                  ========          ========           ========         ========          ========          ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
 fixed charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                         1.03              1.17               1.03             1.17              1.03              1.17



</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.4




CONSENT




We hereby consent to the reference to our “valuation of Interest rate swap transaction (IRS) of Plaza Centers N.V.” in respect of Series A debentures as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2009 and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852 , No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd. and in the Shelf Prospectus filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd. with the Israeli Securities Authority and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange on July 21, 2009.




This consent is not to be construed as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to be filed with the Annual Report under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.




/s/Financial ImmunitiesLtd.

Financial Immunities Ltd.




Rehovot, Israel


May 9, 2010
#### Sachs v State of New York

4th Dept: 143 AD3d 1291

denied*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1970

STEPHEN V. TALMAGE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-339)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: November 15, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen V. Talmage, Appellant Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg,

Gary R. Allen, Randolph L. Hutter, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen V. Talmage appeals from the tax court's orders (1) entered March 11, 1996, granting summary judgment to the Commissioner

and imposing a penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6673(a)(1)(B) (1994) for

pursuing a frivolous action in tax court; and, (2) entered April

17, 1996, denying his motion for reconsideration. We affirm, based

on the reasoning of the tax court.

The government has filed a motion seeking sanctions against

Talmage for noting a frivolous appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 38. We

deny the motion without prejudice to file another motion should

Talmage file another appeal in this court raising similar claims as

those raised in this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 12-8960.

#### Miranda *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Hidden Creek, L.P. v. Lower Salford Twp. Authority

03/23/2016

920 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 129 A.3d 602
#### Carl R. Giglio et al., Respondents, v St. Joseph Inter-community Hospital et al., Respondents-Appellants. Ciminelli-Cowper Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v C.I.R. Electrical Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 775]

— Motions for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the last paragraph of the memorandum-order entered October 2, 2003 (309 AD2d 1266) is amended by deleting the penultimate sentence. Present—Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shaquille D., Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 117]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Larry Stephen, J., at plea; Abraham Clott, J., at sentencing), rendered October 21, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Robert L. Burt, Appellant, v James L. Campbell, as Sheriff of Albany County, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 676]

— Cardona, P.J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), entered May 12, 2002, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, after a hearing.

Petitioner, currently serving a sentence of imprisonment, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in April 2002, contending that his incarceration was illegal because the District Attorney reneged on an agreement that an indictment against him would be dismissed based upon his cooperation in a criminal investigation. Following a hearing, County Court denied the application prompting this appeal.

Habeas corpus relief is unavailable when it is clear that a petitioner could have raised the issues contained therein in the context of a direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion *(see People ex rel. Hayden v Senkowski,*306 AD2d 664 [2003]; *People ex rel. Woodard v Senkowski,*305 AD2d 879 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 511 [2003]; *People ex rel. Smith v Miller,*295 AD2d 706 [2002]). Here, it is undisputed that petitioner advanced the subject argument in a motion to dismiss the indictment based upon the alleged agreement *(see People v Leftwich,*266 AD2d 832 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 881 [2000]; *see also People v Fraisier,*253 AD2d 437 [1998]) and said motion was denied. While petitioner does not detail what steps, if any, were taken to directly challenge said denial, clearly habeas corpus is not the proper remedy *(see People ex rel. Burr v Duncan,*289 AD2d 898 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 612 [2002]). Furthermore, we do not find any “extraordinary circumstances that would warrant a departure from the prescribed orderly procedures” *(People ex rel. Woodard v Senkowski, supra*at 879).

*1068Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Qwest on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: May 3, 2005 |  | By: | /s/RICHARD C. NOTEBAERTRichard C. Notebaert Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and President
|------------------ |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 3, 2005 |  | By: | /s/OREN G. SHAFFEROren G. Shaffer Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer                

---



QuickLinks
. rHE SJJ\TE .... ., ,_.,. . .. P.~pa~ent;qfT;r~nsportationand 

oif~_LA·. sKA· ·. <:~»/'f\TMENTOF · · · · · · · · Public Facilities· 

· / ·· . ...,; '· ... ~:~) '"'!·~or)·'"A'J"'O~' ·-"t ... n t i ~~~ 

.. ,. (" ")E"n r,·]·jr' i\ '(\ STATEWIDE AVIATION J )t' ,~.nF\ t. ... )l··.f,J 

GOVERNOR SEAN PA.RNELL 

July 24, 2012 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

lZ 

Re: Essential Air Service at Manley Hot Springs (MLY) and Minto (51Z) 

DOCKET DOT -OST -2004-17563 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

P.O. Box 196900 

Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6900 

Main: 907.269.0730 

Fax: 907.269.0489 

I am writing to express my strong support for the continuation of the Essential Air Service (EAS) 

program in Alaska and to emphasize the crucial access it provides to our remote communities. 

Manley Hot Springs and Minto depend on scheduled air carrier service for freight, passenger, 

and mail service for basic necessities, routine health services, and economic welfare. 

The State of Alaska continues to assert that the local residents are generally best positioned to 

comment on particular schedules or air carriers, and therefore we think the community should 

. provide comments to you on those specitlc areas. 

Also I want to inform you that Alaska, DOT &PF is building a new airport at Manley that wil-l 

have a longer and wider runway, plus it will have Medium Intensity Runway Lights. This new 

nmway will make aircraft operations safer for the flying public. I expect the new airp01t to be 

operational beginning in the fall of 2013. · 

I respectfully urge US DOT to support and continue the EAS service at Manley and Minto. 

Sincerely, 

Deputy Commissioner - Aviation 

''Get Alaska fvfoving through service and infhtstructure."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

DARRELL JOHNSON,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 561 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
161 A.3d 763

#### ROBERT FERRANTE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE GROUP, DEFENDANT-MOVANT.

March 9, 2017

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for an extension of time within which to file an appellant’s brief (M-889) is granted; said brief to be served and filed on or before March 31, 2017; and if is further

ORDERED that the motion to supplement the record (M-840) is granted.
Schedule of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors


 Exhibit 10.1 
 GLOBALSANTAFE CORPORATION 
 Schedule of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 
 (Effective May 22, 2006) 
  

  

					
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$	32,000	 
	 Committee Chairman Annual Retainer:
	  			
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	12,000	 
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	9,500	 
	 Executive Committee
	  	$	6,500	 
	 Nominating and Governance Committee
	  	$	6,500	 
	 Board Chairman Annual Retainer
	  	$	300,000	 
	 Board Meeting Fee
	  	$	2,500	1
	 Committee Meeting Fee
	  	$	2,500	1
	 Special Assignment Fee (per day)
	  	$	1,000	 
	 Annual Stock Appreciation Right Grant (#)
	  	 	6,000	2
	 Annual Restricted Stock Grant (#)
	  	 	3,000	3



	1	The fee will be $2,000 if participation is by telephone. 


	2	On the date of final adjournment of each annual general meeting of shareholders following the
first such meeting during the director’s tenure. Each non-employee director receives a grant of 10,000 stock appreciation rights on the date of final adjournment of the first annual general meeting during his or her tenure. All stock
appreciation rights will vest 50% one year from date of grant and the remaining 50% two years from date of grant. The other terms of the stock appreciation rights will be determined by the Compensation Committee, which will make the grants at its
discretion on the date of final adjournment of each annual general meeting of shareholders. 


	3	The terms of the restricted stock will be determined by the Compensation Committee, which
will make the annual grant at its discretion on the date of final adjournment of each annual general meeting of shareholders.
APPEAL-DEMOCRAT 

1530 Ellis Lake Drive, P.O. Box 431, Marysville, CA 95901 

(530) 741-2345 

Affidavit of Publication 

(2015.5 C.C.P) 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 

Counties of Yuba and Sutter 

Feather River Air Quality Management District" 

Notice of Public Hearing & Public Workshop 

I am not a party to, nor interested in the above entitled 

matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and 

publisher of THE APPEAL-DEMOCRAT, a newspaper 

of general circulation, printed & published in the City 

of Marysville, County of Yuba, to which Newspaper 

has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation 

by The Superior Court of the County of Yuba, State of 

California under the date of November 9, 1951, No. 

11481, and County of Sutter to which Newspaper 

has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation 

by the Superior Court of the County of Sutter, State of 

California under the date of May 17, 1999, Case No. 

CV PT99-0819 that the notice of which the annexed 

is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), 

has been published in each regular and entire issue of 

said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on 

the following dates, to-wit: 

March 20, 2006 

I declare under penalty of perjury 

that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed at Marysville, California 

March 20, 2006 

This space is for the County Clerk's filing stamp. 

PROOF OF PUBLICATION 

MarchlO Ad tll02535761
---

---

# Exhibit 15.11

CONSENT

We hereby consent to the reference to
our valuation of Series B Debentures and Series A Debentures of Plaza Centers
N.V. as of December 31 2008, in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging
Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2008 and to the incorporation by reference of this
Annual Report in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No.
333-130852 and No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd.

This consent is not to be construed
as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to
be filed with the Annual Report under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.

|/s/
 Giza Zinger Even
|-----------------------------------



Tel Aviv, Israel 
June 25, 2009



---

---
#### Cayetano Ortiz-Cruz et al., Respondents, v Irma L. Evers, as Trustee of the Irma L. Evers Revocable Trust, et al., Appellants, and Fiedler Roofing Co., Respondent.

[56 NYS3d 71]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Elizabeth A. Taylor, J.), entered July 27, 2016, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for *623partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action, and denied the cross motion of defendant owners for summary judgment on their cross claim for common-law indemnification as against defendant Fiedler Roofing Co. (Fielder), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly determined that plaintiffs were entitled to partial summary judgment against defendant owners on the issue of section 240 (1) liability because the ladder that plaintiff Cayetano Ortiz-Cruz was using to take measurements in preparation for work to be performed on the roof of defendant owners’ building broke, causing him to fall to the ground *(see Weber v Baccarat, Inc.,*70 AD3d 487 [1st Dept 2010]). Contrary to defendant owners’ contention, the work that plaintiff was engaged in was a protected activity within the meaning of Labor Law § 240 (1) *(see e.g. Velasco v Green-Wood Cemetery,*8 AD3d 88, 89 [1st Dept 2004]).

Defendant owners’ cross motion for summary judgment on their cross claim for common-law indemnification as against Fiedler was properly denied. Although defendant owners hired Fiedler to perform roof repairs and Fiedler subcontracted the work to plaintiff’s employer, the evidence does not establish as a matter of law that Fiedler directed or controlled plaintiff’s work *(see e.g. McCarthy v Turner Constr., Inc.,*17 NY3d 369, 377-378 [2011]).

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:40 AM

To: 'daryl@darylcrouse.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for Additional Information: Terp et all LLC (FAA-2015-2431)

August 27, 2015 

Dear Mr. Crouse: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-2431). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by 

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and 

remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the 

requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If 

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by September 

10, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.
2017-0840.

#### State v. Summers.

Cuyahoga App. No. 105513. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
#### Com. v. Paxos 15

08/30/2016

163 MAL (2016)

15

. Justice MUNDY did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1040
#### Bochetto & Lentz P.C. v. Datz

08/30/2016

185 EAL (1026)

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 586
Exhibit 32.01

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Macrovision Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Alfred J. Amoroso certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), that to the best of his knowledge:

(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and

(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as of March 2, 2006.



/s/    ALFRED J. AMOROSOAlfred J. AmorosoChief Executive Officer
161 A.3d 764

#### LISA LOMBARDI, PLAINTIFF-MOVANT, v. ANTHONY A. LOMBARDI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

March 9, 2017

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for counsel fees is granted, in part, and counsel fees are awarded in the amount of $18,361.00 and costs are awarded in the amount of $400.80.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13542]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental Research; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Dental Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) 
meetings:

    Name of SEP: National Institute of Dental Research Special 
Emphasis Panel-Review of K08 (98-33).
    Dates: May 15, 1998.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.
    Place: Natcher Building, Rm. 4AN-44F, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 (teleconference).
    Contact Person: Dr. William Gartland, Scientist Review 
Administrator, 4500 Center Drive, Natcher Building, Room 4AN-44F, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2372.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review grant applications and/or 
contract proposals.

    Name of SEP: National Institute of Dental Research Special 
Emphasis Panel-Review of R03s (98-32).
    Dates: May 28, 1998.
    Time: Noon.
    Place: Natcher Building, Rm. 4AN-445, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 (teleconference).
    Contact Person: Dr. William Gartland, Scientist Review 
Administrator, 4500 Center Drive, Natcher Building, Room 4AN-44F, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2372.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review grant applications and/or 
contract proposals.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.
    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research)

    Dated: May 14, 1998.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-13542 Filed 5-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M