alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Leadership Spotlight: Chris Judd

/ Published Dec. 1, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 

# Christopher Judd

                Chris Judd            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Jace Armstrong

VIRIN: 211201-D-AU600-200

## Director, Resource ManagementBattle Creek, Michigan

**Describe your job in a sentence or two.** My Directorate is responsible for resource management which includes the government purchase cards, government travel cards, Eagle support, HR support, DTS, MHE training, deployment plans, etc. We basically have “tentacles” into every part of Disposition Services.

**How long have you worked for the federal government including military service?** 36 years including over 20 years active duty with the Air Force.

**How long have you worked for DLA?** Almost 17 years

**What is your favorite thing about your line of work?** I really enjoy meeting and working with people from different parts of DLA and the DOD...that’s the best way to learn.

**What is the best piece of advice someone has given you?** Treat others how you want to be treated.

**What is one characteristic that you believe every leader should possess?******Treat everyone with respect and be fair.

**Tell us how you approach change.** I welcome it...the saying goes “ the only constant is change,” well, if it’s constant its not really change it’s just life, so you roll with it.

**What do you look for when evaluating top talent?** Find folks willing to work and that want to be part of a team.  That’s more important than finding the perfect fit for a particular position...hire someone with drive and a good work ethic, the rest will take care of itself.

**What are your best practices for achieving goals or accomplishing tasks?** Boil everything down to the lowest level and really work to determine the must haves...too often we get stuck spending time on things that are not critical to accomplishing the mission.

**What would you have done differently in your career if given the opportunity?** Not one thing.

**What was your first job?**  I worked at McDonalds “flipping hamburgers.”

**What is your best memory of working here?**   It’s ongoing...meeting dozens of great and very smart people and learning from them.

**Who is your hero?**  My paternal grandfather.

**What are your hobbies?** Traveling with my wife, golf and hunting...in that order.

**What is your favorite quote?** Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence.  -- Calving Coolidge
# A Word from the Employee Assistance Program Manager

/ Published Sept. 10, 2021
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
At Land and Maritime, we have an Active-Duty component, a number of Guard and Reserve personnel, and many veterans.  Recent events in Afghanistan may have some of those individuals, especially those who served in Afghanistan, experiencing a range of challenging emotions related to the U.S withdrawal from the country.  Those who served during other conflicts may also be feeling strong emotions as they are reminded of their own deployment experiences.

Military personnel and veterans may experience the following reactions related to the current events in Afghanistan:
      - Feeling frustrated, sad, helpless, distressed (including moral distress), angry or betrayed
      - Worrying about Afghans who worked with the U.S. military, like interpreters
      - Experiencing an increase in mental health symptoms like symptoms of PTSD or depression
      - Sleeping poorly, drinking more or using more drugs
      - Trying to avoid all reminders or media or shy away from social situations
      - Having more military and homecoming memories
      - Questioning the meaning of their service or whether it was worth the sacrifices they made

Military personnel and veterans also may feel like they need to expect and/or prepare for the worst and may:
      - Become overly protective, vigilant and guarded
      - Become preoccupied by danger
      - Feel a need to avoid being shocked by, or unprepared for, what may happen in the future

These feelings are a normal response to negative events, especially those events that feel personal.  Avoiding the feelings or trying to “stuff them down” inside is usually a mistake.  It is usually much better to experience the feelings and acknowledge what they mean to you.  Often these feelings will run their course and diminish over time.  If they continue or you feel overwhelmed by them, consider the suggestions below.
      - Engage in positive, healthy activities  that are rewarding, meaningful, or enjoyable, even if you don't feel like it, as they can make you feel better.
      - Stay connected  by spending time with people who give you a sense of security, calm, or happiness, or those who best understand what you are feeling.
      - Practice good self-care  by engaging in activities such as listening to music, exercising, practicing breathing routines, spending time in nature or with animals, journaling or reading inspirational text.
      - Stick to your routines  and follow a schedule for when you sleep, eat, work and do other day-to-day activities.
      - Limit media exposure  especially if it's increasing your distress.

If you feel that talking with someone would help, you have options!  Contact your local EAP representative, Drew Henderson for in-person or by phone sessions.  He can be reached at 614-692-2000 or drew.henderson@dla.mil.  Contact our EAP Contractor, Magellan Ascend at 866-580-9046 for 6 free appointments with a local counselor.  Contact the Veterans Crisis Line at 800-273-8255.

Remember – you don’t have to go it alone!  Don’t hesitate to reach out.
Exhibit 12.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Eugenio Clariond Reyes, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Grupo Imsa, S.A. de C.V.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: June 30, 2004



|       |  |                           
|------ |  | --------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Eugenio Clariond Reyes
|Name:  |  | Eugenio Clariond Reyes    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### S.R.T., In re Interest of; W.Y.O., In re

11/02/2015

475 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 436
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Regan Morris, Appellant.

[47 NYS3d 718]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Everett, J.), rendered October 1, 2015, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see *People v Sanders,*25 NY3d 337, 339-342 [2015]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]). However, the defendant’s claim regarding the voluntariness of his plea survives his waiver of the right to appeal (see *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]; *People v Espejo,*145 AD3d 1031 [2016]). The decision to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court and generally will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see CPL 220.60 [3]; *People v Espejo,*145 AD3d 1031 [2016]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. The record establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered a plea of guilty *(see People v Espejo,*145 AD3d 1031 [2016]; *People v Rodriguez,*142 AD3d 1189, 1189-1190 [2016]).

Moreover, the defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, either during the plea proceedings so as to render his plea involuntary, or with respect to his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see *People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708 [1998]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137 [1981]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Dillon, J.R, Chambers, Sgroi, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.
No. 09-10601.

#### Thomas Davis, Petitioner v. Raymond Booker, Warden.

562 U.S. 847, 131 S. Ct. 92,

178 L. Ed. 2d 58,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6084,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 589 F.3d 302.
Exhibit 32.2











THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906


OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.













Dated:  August 9 , 2012




/s/ Debra P. Roe


Debra P. Roe, CPA


Chief Financial Officer and


Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
Exhibit 15.5

Dario Clemente

Agere Project Management (Pty) Ltd

Suite 6 Coldstream Office Park,

Cnr Hendrik
Potgieter & Van Staden Roads,

Little Falls, Roodepoort,

South Africa

CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON

I, Dario Clemente, consent to the public filing of the technical report titled An Independent Qualified Persons Report on Bokoni
Platinum Mine, Limpopo Province, South Africa and dated March 22, 2012 (the Technical Report) by Anooraq Resources Corporation.

I also consent to any extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Conditions and Results of Operations (the MD&A) for the year ended December 31, 2011 of Anooraq Resources Corporation.

I certify that I have read the annual report on Form 20-F and the MD&A being filed by Anooraq Resources Corporation and that it fairly and accurately represents the information in the sections of the
technical report for which I am responsible.

DATED the 26th day of March, 2012.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Dario
Clemente
|Dario Clemente
#### Cicero Lewis, *Plaintiff in Error,*vs. State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

145 So. 837.

Decision filed January 9, 1933.

*W. A. Bothar*and *E. S. Corlett, Jr.,*for Plaintiff in Error;

*Cary D. Landis,*Attorney General, and *Boy Campbell,*Assistant, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J.,and Whitfield, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Brown, J.

I think this writ of error should be dismissed. The Clerk’s certificate does not cover the en*615tire transcript, and plaintiff in error’s brief utterly fails to comply with Rule 20.

Davis, J.

(Concurring). — The Clerk’s certificate to the transcript is insufficient to cover the bill of exceptions, so the judgment must be affirmed on that portion of the record consisting only of the information, verdict and judgment of life imprisonment, which is before us. The Clerk should verify and certify to *all*of the transcript that is made up, whether prepared by him or not. However, the bill of exceptions if it were properly before us, would not warrant a reversal.
#### In the Matter of Martha V., Respondent, v Tony R., Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 580]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, *654J.), entered on or about January 5, 2016, which granted the mother’s petition to modify a custody order and awarded her sole legal and physical custody of the parties’ children, subject to visitation with respondent father on alternate weekends, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the court properly determined that a full evidentiary hearing was not necessary because it possessed sufficient information to render an informed decision on the children’s best interests and because the father made no offer of proof that would have affected the outcome *(see Matter of Tony R. v Stephanie D.,*146 AD3d 691 [1st Dept 2017]; *Matter of Fayona C. v Christopher T,*103 AD3d 424 [1st Dept 2013]; *compare S.L. v J.R.,*27 NY3d 558, 564 [2016]). Both parties and the attorney appointed for the children, then ages 12 and 15, were provided ample opportunity to present their positions, and the court made the factual basis for its determination clear on the record.

Furthermore, the court’s decision to modify custody based on a change of circumstances and in the best interests of the children, had a sound and substantial basis in the record. The children stated that they wanted to live with their mother for reasons that included verbal abuse by the father, the father’s failure to provide them with food and clothing on a consistent basis, and an incident of domestic violence in their presence that led to the police being called *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167 [1982]; *Matter of Maria A.M. v Dextor N.,*95 AD3d 578 [1st Dept 2012]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ALI AGLLAH ALBWUL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-55292

D.C. Nos. 2:08-cv-04988-DSF

2:06-cr-00387-DSF-2

MEMORANDUM*

 Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 6, 2010** 

Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

FILED

DEC 14 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Ali Agllah Albwul (“Albwul”), a native and citizen of Jordan, appeals the

district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence by a

person in federal custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because Albwul was

removed from the United States to Jordan on May 13, 2010, he is no longer “in

federal custody” and his § 2255 motion is moot. 

“Immigrants who have already been removed . . . do not satisfy the ‘in

custody’ requirement of habeas corpus jurisdiction.” Miranda v. Reno, 238 F.3d

1156, 1159 (9th Cir. 2001). But if an alien files a habeas petition prior to his

removal from the United States, his subsequent removal does not moot the case if

there are “collateral consequences arising from the deportation that create concrete

legal disadvantages.” Zegarra-Gomez v. INS, 314 F.3d 1124, 1125 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Still, “where the grounds for habeas relief will not redress collateral consequences,

a habeas petition does not continue to present a live controversy once the petitioner

is released from custody.” Abdala v. INS, 488 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir. 2007).

Though Albwul filed his § 2255 habeas petition prior to his removal to

Jordan, the relief he seeks—rescission of a stipulated judicial order of

removal—would not redress the collateral consequences of his deportation. His

convictions on two controlled substance-related felonies render him permanently

inadmissible to the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II). Albwul also
3

admitted to entering into a fraudulent marriage to obtain permanent resident status,

rendering him inadmissible to the United States pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §

1182(a)(6)(C)(i). Because Albwul is permanently barred from the United States on

wholly separate grounds, rescission of the stipulated order of removal cannot

meaningfully affect his admissibility and hence cannot serve as a collateral

consequence that would prevent mootness. 

We therefore DISMISS the appeal of the denial of Albwul’s 28 U.S.C. §

2255 motion as moot.
# Kind and caring leader awarded DLA Aviation November Leadership Award

/ Published Feb. 9, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
Oscar Moore , was awarded the DLA Aviation Leadership Award for November 2021. Moore is a supervisory inventory management specialist in the Component/Indirect Material Planning and Support Branch at Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Cherry Point on Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina.

This award recognizes DLA Aviation leaders who exemplify the four leadership traits deemed by the agency as the characteristics needed to be a good leader. These traits are referred to as the four dimensions of transformative leadership: idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration. 

“I feel humbled to receive this award,” Moore said. “I feel that this is a direct reflection of the hard work my team does on a daily basis to support our customer in spite of our current environment.” 

Per the award citation, Moore builds confidence and trust among his 15 employees by always communicating information that he receives from DLA Aviation at Cherry Point leadership that impacts them. He also breaks down task requirements and explains how they affect their overall mission.

“Mr. Moore is a good leader because he explains how various actions may appear to be unimportant but, in the end, will affect the overall mission in a major way,” said Jeffrey Jones, a sustainment specialist on Moore’s team. “Mr. Moore is very knowledgeable about planning and support processes and mentors his employees on a regular basis.  We are challenged by him constantly to be innovative in our problem solving and he provides creative solutions for hard-to-solve issues we encounter daily.”

“I was truly surprised [at receiving the award] because the majority of work as a supervisor is behind the scenes and intangible. I strive to make sure my team has what they need to support our customer and ensure they get the credit and recognition they deserve,” said Moore. 

Jones said Moore has a unique ability to challenge the status quo while teaching his employees how to better support the warfighter and develop their skills at the same time. 

“Mr. Moore not only coaches the team as a whole, but he also coaches us individually based on our career goals and individual job duties,” Jones said.

“It’s always important for an agency to recognize employees for their accomplishments, even if it’s something as simple as a ‘Thank You,’” Moore said. “For this reason, I am humbled and greatly appreciative of this recognition. However, this is not just a win for me but for the entire DLA Aviation at Cherry Point team.”