alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Cordero, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 524]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered June 11, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the second and third degrees and assault in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v*
      *410
      *Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The jury reasonably believed that defendant intended to forcibly take the victim’s property when he hit the victim in the head and immediately grabbed at his pocket *(see People v Gordon,*23 NY3d 643, 650 [2014]; *Matter of Vere C.,*183 AD2d 428, 429 [1st Dept 1992]).

There was also ample proof of physical injury, because the victim testified that due to the severe pain in his mouth, it was difficult for him to open his mouth for two days, and he could not eat during that time *(see e.g. People v Medina,*139 AD3d 460, 460 [1st Dept 2016], *lv denied*28 NY3d 933 [2016]; *People v Mullings,*105 AD3d 407, 408 [1st Dept 2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 945 [2013]). The statutory element of “substantial pain” may be satisfied by relatively minor injuries causing moderate, but “more than slight or trivial pain” *(see People v Chiddick,*8 NY3d 445, 447 [2007]), even in the absence of any medical treatment *(see People v Guidice,*83 NY2d 630, 636 [1994]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
# DLA Pacific now DLA Indo-Pacific

/ Published April 3, 2019

Defense Logistics Agency Pacific has been renamed DLA Indo-Pacific with the signing of DLA General Order No. 09-17. The change follows the renaming of U.S. Pacific Command to U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, which better characterizes the U.S. military’s responsibility and mission in the region.

DLA Indo-Pacific is the agency’s primary liaison to the USINDOPACOM, U.S. Forces Korea, U.S. Forces Japan and Alaska Command. It provides a unified DLA interface for warfighters throughout the USINDOPACOM area of responsibility, integrating DLA support in the region with DLA activities in the continental United States.
#### Amaury Abreu, Respondent, v Otis Casey et al., Respondents, and William Adu-Agyei, Appellant.

[68 NYS3d 447]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered on or about November 22, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant William Adu-Agyei’s (defendant) motion to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This action for personal injuries arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on September 7, 2012. Defendant was operating one of the vehicles involved in the accident.

On August 25, 2015, 13 days before the statute of limitations expired, plaintiff moved to amend the complaint to, among other things, add defendant as a party. A copy of the proposed amended summons and complaint were annexed to plaintiffs moving papers.

By order dated February 4, 2016, and entered on February 5, 2016, the court granted plaintiffs motion. Upon entry of the order granting leave, plaintiff had until February 18, 2016 to serve defendant with the amended pleadings within the applicable statute of limitations *(see Perez v Paramount Communications,*92 NY2d 749, 755-756 [1999]; *Long v Sowande,*27 AD3d 247, 248 [1st Dept 2006]).

On February 10, 2016, plaintiff served all parties including defendant with a copy of the February 4, 2016 order with notice of entry, annexing the amended summons and amended verified complaint. Those papers were filed with the Clerk of the Court on that same date.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, plaintiff was not required to serve him with the motion to amend before the Supreme Court could decide the motion *(see Eastern States Elec. Contrs. v Crow Constr. Co.,*153 AD2d 522, 524 [1st Dept 1989]). Plaintiffs filing of the motion to amend and annexed proposed amended pleadings tolled the applicable statute of limitations *(see Perez,*92 NY2d at 755-756).

In addition, the record shows that plaintiffs claims against defendant were interposed eight days before the statute of limitations expired, as the amended pleadings were annexed to the February 4, 2016 order with notice of entry, which was *443served upon defendant and filed with the Clerk of the Court on February 10, 2016. Plaintiffs failure to file the amended pleadings as a separate docket entry is not fatal to his maintaining the action against defendant, because the amended pleadings were timely filed with the Clerk of the Court after being served upon defendant *(see*CPLR 305), and defendant has not shown any prejudice *(see*CPLR 2001). Further, CPLR 2001 authorizes the court to direct plaintiff to correct this type of filing mistake *(see Matter of Miller v Waters,*51 AD3d 113, 117-118 [3d Dept 2008]).

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Kahn and Singh, JJ.
Exhibit 15.7

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements of Elbit Systems Ltd. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-9354 and 333-139512) of our report dated March 5, 2008, with respect to the 2007 financial statements of Kinetics Ltd. (not separately included in this
Form 20-F), which appears in the annual report on Form 20-F of Elbit Systems Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.



|    |  |                                                               
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman                                     
|    |  | Kesselman & Kesselman                                         
|    |  | Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)                           
|    |  | A member firm of Pricewaterhouse Coopers International Limited

March 12, 2009
# Black History Month spotlight: Ahmad Burse

/ Published Jan. 31, 2020

*Editor’s note: February is Black History Month and this year’s Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute theme is “Honoring the Past, Securing the Future.” Throughout the month, we will spotlight Defense Logistics Agency Energy employees who are honoring their history and making a difference through their accomplishments both in their workplace and community.*

**Describe your job:** I’m currently the acting director for the DLA Energy Equal Employment Opportunity, Diversity & Inclusion Office. I have been with DLA Energy for 10 months. My role is to ensure employees are provided with the opportunity to thrive and reach their full potential. I’m responsible for the DLA Energy EEO program consisting of EEO complaints management, disability program coordination and diversity & inclusion coordination. 

**What makes you proud about your job?** The opportunity to help people see things from a different perspective. I am also proud to join the DLA Energy team because opportunities for EEO professionals can be extremely competitive. Before joining DLA, I worked as an EEO manager with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Prior to that, I was an adjunct instructor at a North Carolina college. 

**What was the biggest influence on your career?**Looking back, I once had a toxic leader who treated me differently because of the way I looked. As much as I tried to conform, it just wasn’t enough. That experience planted seeds of fairness and dignity within me. I made a promise to myself I would never discriminate against someone or allow others to be unlawfully discriminated against. 

**How do you honor your past?** I have a loving family and great friends; I acknowledge and recognize the help I’ve had in every stage of my life. I have accomplished nothing on my own. My mother is one of the most influential people in my life. She showed me how to be strong. My father taught me the importance of self-respect. 

I’m standing on the shoulders of people who had lesser opportunities. I honor my past by helping others and being the best version of me that I can. 

**How do you make a difference?** I smile, acknowledge coworkers, and take the time to speak and truly listen to people. I have a passion for helping others. I’ve volunteered at local schools teaching children how technology impacts their lives, and I’ve assisted veterans in securing gainful employment through mock interviews and federal resume writing training. I like to help people and share my talents with others.

**Do you have any family members that were pioneers in the civil rights movement?** My mother was part of the Women’s Army Corps. In the late 1960’s, women served in these all female versions of the Army. These organizations mainly supported the medical field and my mother was a dental hygienist. These women were trailblazers because they were right beside their male counterparts in major battles such WWII, Korea and Vietnam.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2147 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2147

  To amend chapter 21 of title 28, United States Code, to clarify the 
  standard by which a justice, judge, or magistrate shall disqualify 
                        himself from a hearing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 24 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

 Mr. DeConcini introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 21 of title 28, United States Code, to clarify the 
  standard by which a justice, judge, or magistrate shall disqualify 
                        himself from a hearing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISQUALIFICATION OF JUSTICE, JUDGE, OR MAGISTRATE.

    Section 455(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end thereof the following new 
        paragraph:
    ``(2)(A) For purposes of paragraph (1), the impartiality of a 
justice, judge, or magistrate shall be reasonably questioned if the 
judicial or extrajudicial actions or statements of such justice, judge, 
or magistrate would cause a reasonable person to believe that an 
impartial proceeding is unlikely.
    ``(B) The provisions of subparagraph (A) shall not be construed as 
the only basis to reasonably question the impartiality of a justice, 
judge, or magistrate, such as a question of such impartiality on the 
basis of--
            ``(i) a financial interest of a justice, judge, or 
        magistrate; or
            ``(ii) any other basis described under subsection (b).''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Com. v. Axe 3

04/12/2016

20 MAL (2016)

3

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 656
# 'Leading Change' at Annual Leadership Review 2020

/ Published Aug. 17, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
With the challenges of the novel coronavirus, the Defense Logistics Agency Joint Reserve Force has had to adapt, overcome and be creative in the way it conducts business. One example is the virtual format of the Annual Leadership Review, Aug. 14-16, 2020.More than 90 leaders from around the JRF gathered together over video conferencing software to learn and discuss this year’s theme, “Leading Change.”DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic and DLA Senior Enlisted Leader Army Command Sgt. Maj. Tomeka O’Neal kicked off the conference by providing remarks praising the JRF .“I applaud all of you for learning the most you can about leading a diverse team and being there, adapting and listening,” Skubic said.Skubic reiterated that almost nothing that happens in the joint forces that DLA does not contribute to. She added that all of DLA “runs on hard work, respect, and integrity.” Before turning it over to O’Neal, Skubic said that there has never been a more critical time to check in on coworkers and to take care of everyone, including self-care.O’Neal highlighted the importance of personal connection during this time and reminded the JRF that relationships and words matter, especially in this joint environment.DLA JRF Director Navy Rear Adm. Grafton Chase echoed Skubic’s comments and reminded his force that communication is very important and serving in a joint environment ensures different cultures.“What’s great about the joint environment is we bring those cultures together — you don’t lose your culture, but we learn from each other’s culture,” Chase said.Each day had a different focus for enabling the senior leaders of the major subordinate commands to lead effectively. Each MSC also provided information and updates to showcase what they do as part of the JRF. The topics for each day were strategic learning, operational key leader training, and team effort, respectively.“Our mission as the JRF is to provide DLA with a trained, ready and deployable force to augment the mission and providing the surge capability when and where it’s needed,” Chase said.As with every year, networking with other leaders from different MSCs was a priority and time was given to connect with each other.As the world looks different from what it did a year ago, change has been on a lot of people’s minds and learning to lead amid change is something the JRF focused on during this ALR.
# Reduced Operations at disposal sites Sept. 9-20

/ Published Aug. 9, 2019
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
DLA Disposition Services sites worldwide will observe two weeks of reduced operations Sept. 9-20 as agency personnel conduct a required annual inventory of all items in the organization’s possession.

Requisitions for military units with a critical mission need will continue to be honored and picked up/shipped during the inventory to avoid impact to mission readiness. Other customer business will be affected.

Reutilization, Transfer and Donation customers may not screen property on site during the inventory. However, they can continue to place requisitions using the online ordering system and will be notified when property is ready for pick up or shipment once a site has concluded its inventory.

Customers may experience a reduction in available local turn-in appointments during the inventory period. There will be no scheduled deliveries unless there is demonstrated mission impact/emergency requirement for the turn-in of excess DoD property. For emergencies, customers can contact the area manager or the established disposition site point of contact. 

“We have to make sure all of our on-site inventory matches what is shown in our financial and property accounting systems in order to earn a clean audit,” said Annual Inventory Project Manager Mike Rogers. “We understand that our reduced operations will temporarily inconvenience some of our customers, and we thank them in advance for their patience as we ready our sites for another year of outstanding warfighter support in fiscal 2020.”

Additional customer information and guidance is available here.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2005

To make certain technical corrections, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 25 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. PRYOR, and Mr. LUGAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

MARCH 25 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Committee discharged

A BILL

To make certain technical corrections, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.

4 (a) Sections 101B(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) and

5 103B(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7

6 U.S.C. 1441–2(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) and 1444–

7 2(c)(1)(D)(v)(II)) are each amended by inserting ‘‘without

8 regard to clause (ii)’’ after ‘‘clause (iii)’’.
2

•S 2005 CDS

1 (b) Section 105B(c)(1)(B)(iii)(IV)(bb) of such Act (7

2 U.S.C. 1444f(c)(1)(B)(iii)(IV)(bb)) is amended by strik3 ing ‘‘clause (i)(I)’’ and inserting ‘‘clauses (i) and (ii)’’.

4 (c) Section 204(g) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 1446e(g))

5 is amended—

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting after ‘‘pur7 chase’’ the following: ‘‘(less sales under section 407

8 for unrestricted use)’’; and

9 (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after ‘‘pur10 chases’’ each place it appears the following: ‘‘(less

11 sales under section 407 for unrestricted use)’’.

Æ
#### Com. v. Haynes

08/18/2016

147 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 193
**Exhibit 32.02**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

               In connection with the Annual Report of Macrovision Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ian R. Halifax certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), that to the best of his knowledge:

               (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and

               (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as of March 12, 2004.

|   | /s/ IAN R. HALIFAX                             |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                |   |
|   | **Ian R.   Halifax   Chief Financial Officer** |   |
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 30097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14689]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 105 / Tuesday, June 2, 1998 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 30097]]


                Executive Order 13087 of May 28, 1998

                
Further Amendment to Executive Order 11478, Equal 
                Employment Opportunity in the Federal Government

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, and in 
                order to provide for a uniform policy for the Federal 
                Government to prohibit discrimination based on sexual 
                orientation, it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 
                11478, as amended, is further amended as follows:

                Section 1. The first sentence of section 1 is amended 
                by substituting ``age, or sexual orientation'' for ``or 
                age''.

                Sec. 2. The second sentence of section 1 is amended by 
                striking the period and adding at the end of the 
                sentence ``, to the extent permitted by law.''.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                     May 28, 1998.

[FR Doc. 98-14689
Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
March 19, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KERRY DEAN PARKS, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00554-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                                      
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Malaysia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Com. v. Mabine

04/18/2016

11 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 667
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

September 30, 2016 

Dennehotso Chapter, Navajo Nation Reservation 

P.O. Box 2301 

Dennehotso, AZ 86535 

ATTN: ADMIN OFFICE 

Subject: Request to retain public documents at the Dennehotso Chapter for public 

inspection 

To Whom It May Concern: 

The purpose of this letter is to request that the Dennehotso Chapter of the Navajo Nation 

Reservation retain the enclosed package at the library for at least sixty (60) days for public 

inspection. The package consists of documents related to the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency's final decision on the Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

amendment permit for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation 

Indian Reservation near the city of Aneth, San Juan County, Utah. 

We would greatly appreciate your assistance for making these documents available to the general 

public. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or r9airpermits@epa.gov if you have any questions. 

Enclosure 

Jtdj 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Environmental Engineer 

Permits Office, Air Division