alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Kymani H. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Krystal H., Appellant.

[57 NYS3d 215]-

Appeal by the mother from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Barbara Salinitro, J.), dated February 29, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a hearing, found that the mother neglected the subject child.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

*520The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, alleging that the mother neglected her 16-year-old son by leaving him in the care of an inappropriate caretaker and then refusing to allow the child back into her home. After a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court found that the mother neglected the child.

“At a fact-finding hearing in a neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, a petitioner has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the subject child was neglected” *(Matter of Negus T. [Fayme B.],*123 AD3d 836, 836 [2014]; *see Matter of Alexis S.G. [Shanese B.],*107 AD3d 799, 799 [2013]). A determination of parental neglect following a fact-finding hearing must be based on a preponderance of the evidence, demonstrating “first, that a child’s physical, mental or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired and second, that the actual or threatened harm to the child is a consequence of the failure of the parent or caretaker to exercise a minimum degree of care in providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship” *(Nicholson v Scoppetta,*3 NY3d 357, 368 [2004]; *see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; *Matter of Gianna A. [Jashua A.],*132 AD3d 855, 855 [2015]; *Matter of Clarissa S.P. [Jaris S.],*91 AD3d 785, 785 [2012]).

Here, the petitioner failed to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the mother neglected the child. The record demonstrates that the child voluntarily left the mother’s home to live with two individuals who were not biologically related to the child, but who had assumed the roles of the child’s father and grandmother since the child was 18 months old *(see Matter of Justin P. [Damien P.],*148 AD3d 903, 904 [2017]). While living with these individuals, the child’s needs were met and the mother spoke with the child and his caretakers “maybe three or four times” per week. Under these circumstances, the petitioner failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the child’s physical, mental, or emotional condition had been impaired or was in imminent danger of becoming impaired *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i]; *Matter of Justin P [Damien P.],*148 AD3d at 903-904; *see also Matter of Joseph A. [Fausat O.],*91 AD3d 638, 640 [2012]; *cf. Matter of Caleb C.,*11 AD3d 737 [2004]).

Accordingly, the Family Court should have denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Leventhal, J.P., Hall, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.
No. 09-1530.

#### United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 1776, Petitioner v. Rite Aid of Pennsylvania, Inc.

562 U.S. 838, 131 S. Ct. 187,

178 L. Ed. 2d 43,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5798.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 595 F.3d 128.
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Israel (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Israel (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 6.48   | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15401]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-333]


Power Authority of the State of New York; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of the Power Authority of the State of New York (the 
licensee) to withdraw its February 1, 1996, application for proposed 
amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-59 for the James A. 
FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, located in Oswego County, New York.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the Inservice Leak and 
Hydrostatic Operation technical specification to allow reactor coolant 
system hydrostatic while remaining in the Cold Shutdown Mode. .
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on May 20,1996 
(61 FR 25245). However, by letter dated February 6, 1998, the licensee 
withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated February 1, 1996, and the licensee's 
letter dated February 6,1998, which withdrew the application for 
license amendment. The above documents are available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
document room located at the Reference and Documents Department , 
Penfield Library, State University of New York, Oswego , New York 
13126.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day of June 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph F. Williams,
Project Manager, Project Directorate I-1, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-15401 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned executive officers of First South Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                By: /s/ Thomas A. Vann
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Thomas A. Vann
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer


                                By: /s/ William L. Wall
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  William L. Wall
                                    Title: Executive Vice President,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Date: March 12, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14990]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Labor.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In notice document 98-13975 beginning on page 29033 in the 
issue of Wednesday, May 27, 1998, make the following correction:
    On page 29034 in the first column, after Estimated Time per 
Respondent: 10 minutes, the following entry should be added Total 
Burden Hours: 1,916.

    Dated: June 2, 1998.
Todd R. Owen,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-14990 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
NO. 07-11-0276-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

AUGUST 12, 2011

______________________________

CHRISTOPHER ALDRIDGE, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY;

NO. 10,874; HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER D. DUGGAN, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**ABATEMENT AND REMAND**

	Following a plea of true to the State's Motion to Revoke Community Supervision which had been granted to Appellant, Christopher Aldridge, upon his conviction for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury,[footnoteRef:1] the trial court revoked community supervision and sentenced him to five years confinement and a fine of $1,824.25.  When the clerk's record was filed on August 9, 2011, it came to this Court's attention that the *Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal* contained in the clerk's record is not signed by Appellant as required by Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. [1: Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.02(a)(1) (West 2011).] 

Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to secure a proper *Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal*in compliance with Rule 25.2(d).  Once properly completed and executed, the certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record.  *See* Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(a)(12).  The trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court by September 26, 2011.  This order constitutes notice to all parties, pursuant to Rule 37.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, of the defective certification.  If a supplemental clerk's record containing a proper certification is not filed in accordance with this order, this cause will be referred to the Court for dismissal.  *See*Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). 

It is so ordered.

						Per Curiam

Do not publish.

2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 11



           STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE INCOME (LOSS)


     Basic net (loss) income per share is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented.

     Diluted net (loss) income per share is computed using the weighted average
number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the
periods presented assuming the conversion of all shares of the Company's
Convertible preferred stock into common stock. Common stock equivalent shares
have not been included where inclusion would be antidilutive.

     The following is a reconciliation between the components of the basic and
diluted net income per share calculations (in thousands, except per share
amounts):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         March 31, 1998                      March 28, 1997                 March 30,1996
                               ----------------------------------   -----------------------------   ------------------------------
                                            Weighted   Per share     Net     Weighted   Per share    Net      Weighted   Per share
                                Net loss     shares     amount      income    shares     amount     income     shares     amount
<S>                            <C>             <C>     <C>          <C>         <C>     <C>         <C>         <C>     <C>      
Basic net (loss) income
  per share                    $ (19,288)      5,841   $   (3.30)   $  641      5,202   $    --     $1,590      5,218   $    0.30

Effect of dilutive
  securities-preferred
  stock                                                                         3,208                           3,314
                               ---------    --------   ---------    ------   --------   ---------   ------   --------   ---------

Diluted net (loss) income
  per share plus assumed
  conversions                  $ (19,288)      5,841   $   (3.30)   $  641      8,410   $    --     $1,590      8,532   $    0.19
                               =========    ========   =========    ======   ========   =========   ======   ========   =========
</TABLE>
164 A.3d 412

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CENTENNIAL LAND & DEVELOPMENT CORP., DEVEL, LLC AND STEPHEN D. SAMOST, DEFENDANTS, AND TOWNSHIP OF MEDFORD AND COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, DEFENDANTS, AND JOSEPH SAMOST, DEFENDANT-MOVANT, AND CENTENNIAL PINES CLUB, DEFENDANT/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. JOSEPH SAMOST, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT/FOURTH-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. STEPHEN D. SAMOST, FOURTH-PARTY DEFENDANT.

March 23, 2017

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a motion for leave to appeal as within time (M-898) is granted.

*622ORDERED that the notice of cross-petition for certification is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 13.1




Section 906 Certification by Principal Executive Officer




In connection with the Annual Report of Elbit Imaging Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ron Hadassi, Chairman of the Board of the Company in my capacity as the Company’s principal executive officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 30, 2014




By:
/s/ Ron HadassiName:
Ron HadassiTitle:
Chairman of the Board of Directors
2016-1714.

#### L.G. Harris Family Ltd. Partnership I v. 905 S. Main St. Englewood, L.L.C.

Montgomery App. No. 26682, 2016-Ohio-7242.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Carlos E. Maldonado, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 757]

Appeals (1) from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 26, 2015, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed October 30, 2015, which denied claimant’s application for reopening and reconsideration.

Claimant, an adjunct college professor, was hired to teach a mathematics course during the September 2014 semester. When students from the class complained to the Dean at the college about the fast pace at which claimant was teaching, the Dean and his assistant coordinator, who had observed claimant teach a class, met with claimant and emphasized that the scope and pace of the course curricula should be adjusted so as to ensure that the students understood the material. Claimant resigned the next day, as he considered the change to be contrary to the syllabus that had been distributed to the students, and applied for unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The Board denied claimant’s subsequent application to reopen and reconsider its prior decision. These appeals ensued.*

We affirm. “An employee’s dissatisfaction with the employer’s method of doing business, a matter which had no apparent negative impact on the employee, does not constitute good cause for leaving employment” *(Matter of Ferreira [Commissioner of Labor],*84 AD3d 1609, 1610 [2011] [citations omitted]). According to the Dean’s testimony, and as noted in the course syllabus, it was the employer’s policy that not all of the *1513outlined course material would necessarily be covered during the semester, as depth of the material was more important than breadth. That claimant felt compelled to adhere to the syllabus and disagreed with the manner in which the employer directed him to perform his work does not, under these circumstances, constitute good cause for leaving employment *(see Matter of Manelli [Levine],*49 AD2d 984, 984 [1975]). Any conflict in the testimony regarding the circumstances leading to claimant’s departure created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve *(see Matter of Roberson [Commissioner of Labor],*142 AD3d 1259, 1261 [2016]). Finally, to the extent that claimant challenges a recoverable overpayment of benefits, no such finding appears in the Board’s decisions and, therefore, it is not properly before us on these appeals.

Peters, P.J., Garry, Egan Jr., Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.

*

 Claimant does not raise any issue in his brief with regard to the Board’s denial of his application to reopen and reconsider and, as such, has abandoned any claims in relation thereto *(see Matter of Denes [Commissioner of Labor],*147 AD3d 1144, 1147 n 3 [2017]).
# Pi Day event offers employees fun, fitness and flavor

/ Published March 22, 2020

Some walked, some rode, while others ran – outside in the brisk winter air or inside on a treadmill – as they all worked to rack up the 3.14 miles to help celebrate Pi Day 2020.

The Battle Creek Morale, Welfare, Recreation and Family Readiness staff organized the observance over three days – March 11, 13 and 16 -- and found a sponsor to provide actual pie for participants to enjoy. Sure, the day is supposed to be about honoring one of the world’s most famous numbers, but no seemed to mind a tasty treat.

“It’s delicious,” said Robin Rogers after sampling her piece of apple pie after walking her miles. “If they offered pie every day I would be down here every day.”

Rogers and two of her friends walked the corridors in the basement around the Battle Creek Fitness Center for a half-hour to participate. While they were walking, Melissa Smith pedaled one of the stationary bikes to knock out her mileage in 13 minutes.

“Riding the bike felt good,” Smith said.  She also enjoys competing in dragon boat races and running. “I did a 5K run on Sunday under 50 minutes.”

It was the fourth Pi Day run for the Federal Center, but only the second time pie was offered to those participating at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center. Sports and Fitness Facility Manager Martha Kerns having a virtual event allow participants to compete on their own and submit the time.

“Any of the cardio equipment like we have in the Fitness Center can be used – a stationary bike, treadmill, rower, elliptical -- the only requirement is finishing 3.14 miles,” Kerns said.

Michelle Moore and her friend Denise Bruce also shared some camaraderie as they walked on adjoining treadmills for the event. Both said they appreciated the MWR staff’s efforts to conduct the annual event.

“It’s a great way to the end the week, and the pie is an extra treat,” Moore said.

Runners Jessica Waynick and Angie Wilbur both took advantage of the sunny weather on March 13 to put in their paces outdoors. While the sun was out, both said it wasn’t really warm.

“It really looks beautiful with the sunshine, but it was windy,” Wilbur said

Even with the wind, Waynick her run was still “great.”

“It was nice to have the opportunity to run outside,” Waynick said. “I don’t like to run on a treadmill for too long.”

The Pi Day celebration wrapped up March 16. Kerns said the top finishers included Smith, who completed the required distance on the recumbent bike in 13:32, Chuck Born finished his treadmill run in 24:45 while fellow runners Chad McKeever, Micah Coplin, Cory William and Chris Ashbay ran together outdoors with a time of 29:30. Jody Ward workout on the elliptical with a time of 25.34.

Regardless of how they participated, everyone seemed to enjoy some fun and flavor while working on their resiliency.

“I’m happy; I’m stress free,” said Dana Thornbury.