alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Lee takes command of DLA Distribution Puget Sound, Washington

/ Published Aug. 26, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Navy Cmdr.  Evelyn Lee took command of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Puget Sound, Washington, during a ceremony held Aug. 23.

“Commander Evelyn Lee is the right person to continue the strong leadership that we have had at Puget Sound,” said Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones, commanding officer, DLA Distribution. “Evelyn is no stranger to the Defense Logistics Agency. Her most recent assignment was as chief of staff with the audit task force at DLA.”

According to Lee’s biography she served afloat with the USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) and the USS Chosin (CG 65), earning Chosin the seventh consecutive Logistics Excellence Award. She also served a tour as director, Joint Logistics Planning Center; Combined Joint Task Force - Horn of Africa, Djibouti, Africa.

Lee is a 1993 graduate of The University of Memphis, Tennessee, earning a bachelor of business administration degree in information systems and decision sciences. She earned her master of education degree from Vanderbilt University in 1997. Lee is also a 2014 graduate of the United States Army Command and General Staff College.

She is a native of Nashville, Tennessee, and earned her commission in July 2001 through Officer Candidate School in Pensacola, Florida.

“I’m confident that DLA Distribution Puget Sound will continue to meet all challenges head on under your leadership,” said Jones.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1514]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 17, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Hibernia Corporation, New Orleans, Louisiana; to merge with 
Firstshares of Texas, Inc., Marshall, Texas, and thereby indirectly 
acquire First National Bank, Marshall, Texas.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. CountryBanc Holding Company, Edmond, Oklahoma; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of First State Holding Company of Elkhart, 
Elkhart, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire First State Bank of 
Elkhart, Elkhart, Kansas.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. MainBancorp, Inc., Austin, Texas, and Maincorp Intermediate 
Holding Co., Inc., Wilmington, Delaware; to acquire 100 percent of the 
voting shares of, and thereby merge with First National Bancorporation, 
Inc., Ennis, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire First National Bank 
of Ennis, Ennis, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 16, 
1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-1514 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
*January 10, 2018*

2018-Ohio-62.]

2016-1882.

#### State v. Graham.

Portage C.P. No. 2016 CR 107 E. On appellant’s motion to accept record instanter or for alternative *1483relief and motion to deem record as filed. Motions granted. Appellant’s motion to unseal proceedings denied. Counsel for appellant in this case and counsel for appellant in his postconviction-relief proceedings may come to the Supreme Court of Ohio clerk’s office to review the sealed documents.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1469

To require air carriers to provide 90 days’ notice to the Secretary of Transportation, the appropriate State agencies, and affected communities prior

to the termination, suspension, or significant reduction of air service.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Mr. DORGAN (for himself, Mr. CONRAD, and Mr. FORD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To require air carriers to provide 90 days’ notice to the

Secretary of Transportation, the appropriate State agencies, and affected communities prior to the termination,

suspension, or significant reduction of air service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Air Service Termi5 nation Notice Act of 1993’’.
2

S 1469 IS

1 SEC. 2. AIR SERVICE TERMINATION NOTICE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title IV of the Federal Aviation

3 Act of 1958 (49 App. U.S.C. 1371 et seq.) is amended

4 by adding at the end the following new section:

5 ‘‘SEC. 420. AIR SERVICE TERMINATION NOTICE.

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—An air carrier may not termi7 nate, air transportation to any point, unless such air car8 rier has given the Secretary, each appropriate State agen9 cy, and each affected community at least 90 days’ notice

10 before such termination.

11 ‘‘(b) EMERGENCY EXCEPTION.—On a case-by-case

12 basis, the Secretary may modify or waive the requirements

13 of subsection (a) for an air carrier experiencing a sudden

14 and unforeseen financial emergency, if the Secretary finds

15 that such requirements impose undue hardship on such

16 air carrier.’’.

17 (b) CONFORMING AGREEMENT.—The portion of the

18 table of contents of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 re19 lating to title IV is amended by inserting immediately

20 after the item relating to section 419 the following new

21 item:

‘‘Sec. 420. Air service termination notice.

‘‘(a) In general.

‘‘(b) Emergency exceptions.’’.

22 SEC. 3. CIVIL PENALTIES.

23 Section 901(a)(1) of the Federal Aviation Act of

24 1958 (49 App. U.S.C. 1471(a)(1)) is amended by insert-
3

S 1469 IS

1 ing ‘‘section 420 or’’ immediately after ‘‘$10,000 for each

2 violation of’’.

Æ
162 A.3d 291

#### IN THE MATTER OF VINCENT L. VERDIRAMO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 226221965)

June 15, 2017

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-181, recommending that the motion for reciprocal discipline filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics pursuant to *Rule*1:20-14 against VINCENT L. VERDIRAMO, formerly of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, be denied for lack of jurisdiction, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion for reciprocal discipline filed against VINCENT L. VERDIRAMO in District Docket No. XIV-2012-0341E, is hereby denied for lack of jurisdiction under *Rule*1:20-14.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14318]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-067-7123-00-6683]


Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area, Imperial County, CA; 
Planning Initiation

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management, El Centro Field Office will 
initiate a planning effort for the Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area 
in Imperial County, CA as of [the date of this publication]. This plan 
will replace the outdated existing Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area 
Management Plan written in 1987. The first stage of the planning effort 
will be to conduct open houses to gather public comments and concerns. 
Open houses are tentatively scheduled for San Diego, CA., Orange 
County, CA., and Phoenix, AZ. Written comments will be accepted through 
June 30, 1998 at the address below.

DATES: Dates and times will be published in local newspapers.

ADDRESSES: Locations will be published in local newspapers.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elayn Briggs, Operations Staff Chief, 
at the Bureau of Land Management, El Centro Field Office, 1661 S. 4th 
St., El Centro, CA 92243, e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b6e6979626c6c784b686a25696766256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cbaea9b9a2acacb88ba8aae5a9a7a6e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (760) 
337-4400.
Terry A. Reed,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-14318 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7325

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus REYNALDO S. LUNA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (CR-01-359-MJG; CA-03-482-MJG) Submitted: March 5, 2004 Decided: March 29, 2004 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reynaldo S. Luna, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Matthew Schenning, Lisa M. Griffin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Reynaldo S. Luna seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Luna has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
---

---

Exhibit 15.9

# LETTER OF CONSENT

We hereby consent to the reference
to our studies relating to the valuation of an embedded derivative included in a loan
agreement as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 prepared for Elbit Imaging Ltd. (the Company)
dated March 2008, in the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852, No.
333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd, as required by the U.S
Securities and Exchange Commission.

This consent is not to be construed
as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required
to be filed with the Annual Report under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.

| |                                              
| | ---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
| | Very truly yours,                            
| | /s/ BDO Ziv Haft Consulting & Management Ltd.

November 17, 2008
Tel Aviv, Israel



---

---
# DLA Troop Support rushes blankets to customers in Europe

/ Published May 19, 2020
PHILADEPHIA, 
Quick action and strong ties with a vendor by Defense Logistics Agency employees helped speed delivery of 200 wool blankets to U.S. Army Europe Mortuary Affairs in Stuttgart, Germany, in response to COVID-19 in late April.DLA Troop Support’s Clothing and Textiles team coordinated the request, which was initially sent to DLA Troop Support Europe and Africa Customer Account Specialist Jamarys Diaz, with Travis Association for the Blind in Austin, Texas. The blankets were delivered in seven days and are used to present non-viewable human remains in a respectful, dignified manner, said Kyle Cherrington, program manager for USAREUR Theater Mortuary Affairs.Marcus Hawkins, a DLA sourcing strategy specialist on-site at Travis, and Denise Vogelei, a Clothing and Textiles contracting officer, researched shipping options to ensure quick, affordable delivery.“The team determined shipping the blankets directly to Germany would be the best option, with a delivery timeframe of five to seven days from time of departure,” Hawkins said, adding that Travis picked, packed and shipped the blankets within 24 hours of request.Travis also provided tracking information that Diaz shared with the customer.“As the primary DLA Troop Support Europe and Africa CAS for Clothing and Textiles, I can rely on Travis,” Diaz said. “They always go above and beyond to satisfy our needs and that of our customers.”Close coordination between DLA and the vendor made it possible for the blankets to be delivered quickly despite distance, time differences and social distancing, Vogelei added.More information on DLA’s COVID-19 support is available at www.dla.mil.
# Strategy set to strengthen supply-chain security

/ Published July 18, 2019
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
The Defense Logistics Agency has a new roadmap for addressing supply-chain security issues like counterfeit parts and the compromise of Commercial and Government Entity codes.

Air Force Col. Scott Ritzel, executive director of DLA’s Nuclear Enterprise Support Office, and 20 subject matter experts from throughout the agency wrote the comprehensive strategy, which highlights the importance of DLA’s global supply chain, its security architecture, strategic focus areas, and how DLA leverages innovation, data management, technology and cybersecurity.

Addressing supply-chain threats typically involves numerous DLA organizations, Ritzel said. The new strategy outlines an all-inclusive path forward for identifying, prioritizing and mitigating risks and existing threats.

“We operate a global supply chain that’s vulnerable to various threats, whether it be cyber or nefarious actors who are intentionally trying to either disrupt supply chains or present themselves as legitimate vendors,” he said. “Without a strategy, we don’t have a focused effort to protect the global supply chain.”

The plan is outlined on DLA’s Supply Chain Security Strategy webpage, which includes a message from DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams and related articles.

DLA has an “inherent imperative” to ensure detection and protection measures are built into agency systems, processes and infrastructure, Williams wrote, adding that the strategy provides an avenue for the agency to strengthen operational resiliency.

“It anchors to the fundamental elements of supply-chain risk management and mission assurance,” he wrote. “I need every DLA member to understand this strategy and to support it wherever you may fit in, because supply-chain disruption is not an option for the warfighter.”
#### Juan A. Ramirez, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

[53 NYS3d 529]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Faviola Soto, J.), entered December 18, 2015, after a jury trial, in plaintiff’s favor, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the complaint dismissed.

There is no evidence that defendants had prior written notice that the curb in Crotona Park North on which plaintiff tripped was “obstructed” by overgrown vegetation *(see*Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201 [c] [1], [2]; *Monteleone v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park,*74 NY2d 917 [1989]; *Carlo v Town of Babylon,*55 AD3d 769 [2d Dept 2008]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
No. 10-5345.

#### Donald Ray McCray, Petitioner v. Clerk of the Court.

562 U.S. 806, 131 S. Ct. 281,

178 L. Ed. 2d 8,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7735.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
#### Mercer v Bryant

App Div, 3d Dept: 2016 NY Slip Op 82267(U)

denied*
#### VanBuskirk v. Gehlen

DA 16-0410

05/16/17

2017 MT 119N

Affirmed

Dist. 12 (Hill)
# Surplus military tents repurposed as coronavirus testing sites

/ Published Nov. 27, 2020
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
New Jersey’s Union County is using surplus military tents from Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services to aid local COVID-19 testing.

The tents, which were declared excess at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, are being used at a drive-thru test center serving Union County residents.

DLA property disposal specialists made information and photos of the versatile field tents, originally valued at about $10,000 each, available to qualified reuse customers. The lot of 20 tents was distributed to an Army unit at Fort Hood, Texas; Federal Firefighter Program participants; and Law Enforcement Support Office recipients like the Union County Police Department, said Property Disposal Specialist Cindy Anderson.

Excess military tents have also been used for COVID-19 testing throughout the pandemic by customers in Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Hampshire, South Dakota, South Carolina and Indiana.
No. 12-888.

#### Town of Oyster Bay, New York *v.*Kirkland, Commissioner, New York State Division of Human Rights, et al.

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.
#### Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass’n v. Brown

CAAP-11-0000572

05/19/2014

Vacated, Remanded and Dismissed
#### Com. v. Alwan

10/22/2015

291 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 113 A.3d 353
#### In the Matter of William L. Brown, an Attorney.

[53 NYS3d 565]

Per Curiam.

William L. Brown was admitted to practice by this Court in 1984 and lists a business address in Broome County with the Office of Court Administration. Brown now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons *(see*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney.

As is noted by AGC, Brown is presently delinquent in his New York attorney registration requirements, having failed to register for the most recent biennial period beginning in 2016 *1610
      *(see*Judiciary Law § 468-a; Rules of Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1). Inasmuch as Brown is therefore subject to potential disciplinary action *(see*Judiciary Law § 468-a [5]; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 8.4 [d]; *see also Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a,*113 AD3d 1020, 1021 [2014]; *Matter of Arms,*251 AD2d 743, 743-744 [1998]; *Matter of Ryan,*238 AD2d 713, 713-714 [1997]; *Matter of Farley,*205 AD2d 874, 874-875 [1994]), he is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and his application must be denied *(see Matter of Cluff,*148 AD3d 1346, 1346 [2017]; *Matter of Bomba,*146 AD3d 1226, 1226-1227 [2017]). Further, any future application by Brown must be supported by proof of his full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 *(see Matter of Frank,*146 AD3d 1228, 1228-1229 [2017]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Devine, Clark and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

Ordered that William L. Brown’s application for permission to resign is denied.
# Summer 2020 newsletter offers latest R&D news 

/ Published Aug. 5, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The summer edition of The Innovator is now available. The Innovator is electronically published quarterly with articles and information for employees on research and development projects, updates, and upcoming events and activities.

The summer 2020 theme is Synchronizing, Sustaining and Safeguarding our Supply Chain. Topics include:

– Chief’s Corner – DLA Research and Development is focused on innovative technology solutions in support of DLA’s mission to sustain warfighter readiness and lethality by delivering preemptive supply chain solutions. With the global pandemic of COVID-19, DLA’s major subordinate commands and DLA Headquarters directorates have demonstrated America’s supply chain resilience. This issue focuses on supply chain synchronization and sustainment efforts, including R&D’s response to COVID-19, and on internal processes that safeguard DLA’s financial and budget execution. 

– R&D Knowledge Synchronization: Introducing the New J68 R&D Knowledge Management Portal – With its new Knowledge Management Portal, R&D is demonstrating commitment to knowledge sharing across organizations by using available technology within the DLA ecosystem as well as embracing partnership efforts across R&D program portfolios and programmatic initiatives. – Finance Corner: Synchronizing and Safeguarding Resources: Audit Visit Demonstrates Enabling Processes – The DLA Ernst and Young team is conducting financial reviews of the General Funds appropriated programs, furthering efforts to safeguard internal funding execution processes.  

-- Program Highlights: Subsistence Network – The Subsistence Network Program conducts Research Development Test and Evaluation projects that promote synchronizing, sustaining and safeguarding the subsistence supply chain.

-- J68 R&D Provides Supply Chain Solutions to Combat COVID-19 – Through multiple efforts, R&D has supported the nationwide response to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

-- DLA Partnership Highlight: J6 Strategic Communications Team

– About Us: J68 R&D – DLA R&D develops innovative capabilities and processes that improve logistics operations and strengthen the industrial base in support of the warfighter, the agency and the Defense Department.

– Upcoming R&D Events and Activities

Comments or questions about the newsletter can be submitted to logistics.research@dla.mil.
2016-1453.

#### State ex rel. Sevayega v. Gallagher.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104226, 2016-Ohio-5421. Reported at 161 Ohio St.3d 208, 2017-Ohio-8369, 87 N.E.3d 212. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., not participating.