alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
"RWMENTOF 

^NSPORTAJION 

n^PRATIOi'iS SERVED MARCH 15, 2011 ^ ^ 

2011 m lb A !i : 00 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2011-0061 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Complaint of Complainant Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"Complainant") was filed on January 24, 2011. Respondent SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 

(hereinafter "Respondent") had filed a Request for Hearing on December 27, 2010. 

On February 11, 2011, Respondent filed a notice withdrawing its Request for 

Hearing. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 
1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing be and is hereby 

granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

^ Ly^^-rp\lco^^ 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-0061 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Representative 

Director, Government and Legal Affairs 

SkyWest Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

.Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-15,305-03

EX PARTE MARK TWAIN SIMPSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W13-56596-K(A) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J. filed a concurring opinion joined by KELLER, P.J. and

SLAUGHTER, J.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. The

Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Simpson v. State, No. 05-14-00618-CR (Tex.

App.—Dallas April 20, 2015)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for

a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. 

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective by convincing him

to plead guilty without a bargain, by failing to properly advise him of the consequences of an open

plea, by making him believe that the judge was going to grant him probation or sentence him to less

than 25 years, by failing to honor his desire to proceed to a jury trial, by failing to secure a plea
2

bargain for less than 25 years when the trial court granted a motion for new trial, and by failing to

adequately defend him during the State’s appeal on the issue of the granting of a new trial. Applicant

has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668

(1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for

findings of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel

to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial court may use anymeans set out

in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If

counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whethertrial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 24, 2022

Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 9000-0097]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request Entitled Information 
Reporting to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (Taxpayer 
Identification Number)

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of request for comment regarding an extension to an 
existing OMB clearance (9000-0097).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 
Secretariat will be submitting to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a currently 
approved information collection requirement concerning Information 
Reporting to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (Taxpayer 
Identification Number). The clearance currently expires on September 
30, 1998.

DATES: Comments may be submitted August 10, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other 
aspect of this collection of information, copy to the General Services 
Administration, FAR Secretariat (MVRS), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4035, 
Washington, DC 20405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Nelson, Federal Acquisition 
Policy Division, GSA (202) 501-1900.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Purpose

    Subpart 4.9, Information Reporting to the Internal Revenue Service 
(IRS), and the provision at 52.204-3, Taxpayer Identification, 
implement statutory and regulatory requirements pertaining to taxpayer 
identification and reporting.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Public reporting burden for this collection of information is 
estimated to average 6 minutes per response, including the time for 
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
collection of information.
    The annual reporting burden is estimated as follows: Respondents, 
250,000; responses per respondent, 12; total annual responses, 
3,000,000; preparation hours per response, .10; and total response 
burden hours, 300,000.

Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requester may obtain a copy of the 
justification from the General Services Administration, FAR Secretariat 
(MVRS), Room 4035, Washington, DC 20405, telephone (202) 501-4755. 
Please cite OMB Control No. 9000-0097, Information Reporting to the 
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (Taxpayer Identification Number), in all 
correspondence.

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
Sharon A. Kiser,
FAR Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 98-15415 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-P
#### U.S. Bank N.A. v DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc.

1st Dept: 141 AD3d 431

granted
No. 09-1218.

#### Corline Allen, et al., Petitioners v. McWane, Inc.

562 U.S. 828, 131 S. Ct. 73,

178 L. Ed. 2d 25,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6532.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 593 F.3d 449.
2017-0500.

#### State v. Upkins.

Shelby App. No. 17-16-04. Motion to consolidate case denied.

Fischer, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for decision in 2016-1742, *State v. Upkins.*
<PAGE>   16

                            AMENDMENT ONE
                                TO THE
                          RESTATED BYLAWS OF
                         PAUL MUELLER COMPANY
                         ADOPTED MAY 6, 1991

                              May 1, 1995

     RESOLVED, that the current Section 26 of the Bylaws of the
Company shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:

     26. SALARIES AND COMPENSATION -- Salaries and incentive
         compensation plans of all executive officers (as that term
         is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission) of
         the Corporation shall be administered by the Compensation
         and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors.  Salaries
         and compensation plans of all other employees of the Corpor-
         ation shall be administered by the President or his
         designated representative.

                                 16
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 1, 2014

Order 

October 1, 2014

148617(59)

KENNETH J. SPEICHER,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

COLUMBIA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES 

and COLUMBIA TOWNSHIP PLANNING 

COMMISSION,

Defendants-Appellants.

SC: 148617

COA: 306684

Van Buren CC: 11-600857-CZ

__________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellants for leave to file 

a responsive brief in opposition to the amicus curiae brief filed by Outside Legal 

Counsel, PLC, and attorney Philip L. Ellison is GRANTED. The brief submitted on

September 23, 2014, is accepted for filing.
#### Pittsford Canalside Props., LLC, Matter of, v Village of Pittsford

Sup Ct, Monroe County, 3/20/17 (137 AD3d 1566)

denied
# Mission essential employees at DLA Distribution receive COVID-19 vaccine

/ Published March 30, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Over 1,000 mission essential employees who’ve remained on site at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Susquehanna to provide pandemic support received the first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine by March 26.

First and second doses are being administered at a vaccine pod at the base fitness center, where Fillmore U.S. Army Health Clinic staff are providing shots to installation employees. The vaccines were made possible through coordination between officials at DLA Distribution and the Dunham U.S. Army Health Clinic at the U.S. Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania.

                Jennifer O’Hara, center, a registered nurse for the Fillmore U.S. Army Health Clinicand manager of a COVID-19 vaccine pod at Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna in Pennsylvania, provides post vaccine information March 19, 2021, as Irma Gilke, Susquehanna Club cook, provides a vaccination card to Marine Corps Brig. Gen. Keith D. Reventlow, DLA Distribution commander. Photo by Shannon Weldon (210319-D- XJ975 -5134)                            Mission essential employees at DLA Distribution receive COVID-19 vaccine  By Dawn Bonsell, DLA Distribution Public Affairs                            Jennifer O’Hara, center, a registered nurse for the Fillmore U.S. Army Health Clinicand manager of a COVID-19 vaccine pod at Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna in Pennsylvania, provides post vaccine information March 19, 2021, as Irma Gilke, Susquehanna Club cook, provides a vaccination card to Marine Corps Brig. Gen. Keith D. Reventlow, DLA Distribution commander. Photo by Shannon Weldon (210319-D- XJ975 -5134)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Shannon WeldonVIRIN: 210319-D-XJ975-5134

DLA employees from the distribution center; Parachute Rigger Unit; and Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation are helping stage and monitor the vaccine pod, checking patients in and taking temperatures. The pod is managed by Jennifer O’Hara, a registered nurse from the clinic.

Features like high ceilings and a large footprint for proper social distancing make the fitness center a good location for the vaccine pod, she said.

“Without the support of the DLA Installation Management team, we would have needed to temporarily close the installation’s Fillmore U.S. Army Health Clinic for normal operations in order to support the vaccine pod,” added Dr. Christina B. Maier, clinic medical director. “Now we are able to maintain a full schedule of appointments for active-duty military, retirees and family members.”

Protecting people has been a Defense Department priority throughout the pandemic. DOD and DLA officials have coordinated with the Defense Health Agency, state and local leaders, host nation officials and public health experts to ensure safety while providing personal protective equipment and vaccines.
Exhibit 15.3




CONSENT




We hereby consent to the reference to our valuation dated 1 February 2010 of Radisson Hotel Complex Bucharest of SC Bucuresti Turism SA as of December 31, 2009 in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2009 and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd. and in the Shelf Prospectus filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd. with the Israeli Securities Authority and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange on July 21, 2009.




This consent is not to be construed as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to be filed with the Annual Report under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.




/s/SHM Smith Hodgkinson (Romania) srl

SHM Smith Hodgkinson (Romania) srl




Bucharest, Romania


May 9, 2010
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hal La Valley, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 848]

— Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered April 8, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of sodomy in the first degree.

After pleading guilty to two counts of sodomy in the first degree and waiving his right to appeal, defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of 10 years in prison, to be followed by a maximum five-year period of postrelease supervision. On his appeal, defendant primarily argues that his plea was not knowingly entered because County Court failed to inform him at the time of the plea that his sentence would include a period of mandatory postrelease supervision. Although defendant failed to register a timely objection at sentencing or otherwise move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction *(see People v Wehrle,*308 AD2d 660, 661 [2003]), he argues that we should exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to vacate the plea *(see People v Jachimowicz,*292 AD2d 688, 688 [2002]). We *1213decline to do so, however, inasmuch as defendant did not object at the time of sentencing *(see People v Van Gorden,*307 AD2d 547, 548 [2003]). Likewise, we find no basis for remitting the matter to County Court to give defendant the opportunity to present mitigating evidence regarding the appropriate period of postrelease supervision.

To the extent that defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel calls into question the voluntariness of his plea, it survives the waiver of appeal but is also unpreserved *(see People v Miller,*306 AD2d 752, 753 [2003]). Were we to address this claim, we would find that defense counsel negotiated a favorable plea and provided meaningful representation *(see People v Kreydatus,*305 AD2d 935, 936 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 595 [2003]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be similarly unavailing.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Harley, Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 824]

*444Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), entered on or about February 11, 2016, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate a judgment of conviction rendered March 26, 2014, unanimously affirmed.

By pleading guilty in the underlying proceeding, defendant automatically forfeited appellate review of his claim, based on *People v Zinke*(76 NY2d 8 [1990]), that he had an ownership interest in the stolen property, and thus could not be guilty of larceny *(see People v Plunkett,*19 NY3d 400 [2012]; *see also People v Levin,*57 NY2d 1008 [1982]; *People v Mendez,*25 AD3d 346 [1st Dept 2006]). While defendant styles his claim as one of “actual innocence,” the gist of his claim is that, as a matter of statutory interpretation, his conduct does not constitute larceny. Since such a claim is based on the record that was, or could have been, made before Supreme Court, it is not the proper subject of a CPL 440.10 motion. To the extent defendant’s argument could be construed as alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with the guilty plea, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *People v Ford,*86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; *Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]).

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Webber, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2148

To delay procurement of the CVN–76 aircraft carrier.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Mr. SIMON, and Mr. BUMPERS) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on

Armed Services

A BILL

To delay procurement of the CVN–76 aircraft carrier.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The CVN–76 Procure5 ment Termination and Deficit Reduction Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CVN–76 AIRCRAFT CARRIER PRO7 GRAM.

8 No contract may be entered into for procurement of

9 (including advance procurement of long lead items for) a

10 CVN–76 aircraft carrier before October 1, 1999. Any such
2

•S 2148 IS

1 contracts entered into before the date of the enactment

2 of this Act shall be terminated.

Æ
# Women’s History Month spotlight: Maria Rodriguez

/ Published March 20, 2020

*Editor’s note: March is Women’s History Month and this year’s Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute theme is “Honoring the Past, Securing the Future.” Throughout the month, we will spotlight Defense Logistics Agency Energy employees who are honoring their history and making a difference through their accomplishments both in their workplace and community.*

**Describe your job:** I’m an Aerospace Energy Resolution Specialist performing accountable inventory reconciliation activities to include investigating discrepancies, initiating inventory comparisons and counts based on balance differences, and supporting a variety of partners/customers within the aerospace industry.

**How long have you worked at DLA?**I’ve worked for DLA since 2003. I joined the Aerospace Energy team in November 2018 from the DLA Energy Americas East Houston office. I’ve served in every DLA Energy office except this one, so I thought I make it my last stop before retirement. The last four years of my military service prior to retiring, I developed a strong connection to DLA. As a U.S. Army Petroleum Supply Specialist from 1979-2002, I served in a variety of positions, commands and deployments. I feel privileged to continue serving as a member of the DLA Energy team. 

**What makes you proud about your job?** I'm proud that DLA Energy affords me the opportunity to serve in ways beyond the office. For example, when natural disasters occurred I volunteered with the DLA Energy’s Task Force Americas during Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria. I deployed to multiple inhospitable locations, under less than desirable conditions, e.g. no electricity or clean running water, to perform services needed to help others.  

**Can you share your most recent professional success story?** Since my arrival at Energy Aerospace, I researched, developed and completed a data cleansing effort to align Defense Fuel Support Point inventories with DLA Energy’s Enterprise Business System. I was responsible for updating Aerospace regulations/guidance, which was instrumental in providing closure for DLA Audit’s office notice of findings and recommendation in a timely manner.  

**What would you consider your greatest accomplishment?** My first time on an airplane was in 1979 when I traveled from Puerto Rico to attend Army Basic Training. I spoke no English. Through hard work and sleepless nights, I learned English by reading newspapers, books and watching the news. My life changed when I left the comforts of my home to join the Army more than 40 years ago. I've come a long way and I consider this life-changing decision my greatest accomplishment.

**How do you honor your past?** Never forgetting where I came from. I celebrate my great heritage and honor my past through family and friends still living in Puerto Rico. Our culture is very diverse and we maintain long standing traditions through food, music and holidays.