alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-12-1998             DEC-12-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-12-1998             DEC-12-1999
<CASH>                                      17,015,978              10,555,323
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,716,494               1,717,668
<ALLOWANCES>                                   830,000                 827,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,328,755                 793,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,727,554              13,436,394
<PP&E>                                      11,722,910              13,066,678
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,784,993               4,110,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,582,308              39,274,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,603,256               2,392,299
<BONDS>                                     28,710,569              33,167,498
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       42,065,653              43,723,582
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        35,028                  35,028
<OTHER-SE>                                (28,243,499)            (40,204,209)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,582,308              39,274,198
<SALES>                                      1,922,659                 760,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,285,823               6,465,627
<CGS>                                        2,790,528                 913,038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,506,280               1,540,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,403,700                 280,393
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,832,475               5,156,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (15,433,395)             (9,580,160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (15,433,395)             (9,580,160)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,433,395)             (9,580,160)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.84)                  (3.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 510 and 520


Animal Drugs, Feeds, and Related Products; Change of Sponsor

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal 
drug regulations to reflect the change of sponsor for an approved new 
animal drug application (NADA) from Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc., to 
Pfizer, Inc.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 1, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. McKay, Center for Veterinary 
Medicine (HFV-102), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., 
Rockville, MD 20855, 301-827-0213.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc., 7101 College 
Blvd., suite 580, Overland Park, KS 66210, has informed FDA that it has 
transferred the ownership of, and all rights and interests in, the 
approved NADA 141-080 (selegiline hydrochloride tablets) to Pfizer, 
Inc., 235 East 42d St., New York, NY 10017. The agency is amending 21 
CFR 510.600(c)(1) and (c)(2) to remove the sponsor name for Deprenyl 
Animal Health, Inc., because the firm no longer is the holder of any 
approved NADA's. The agency is also amending 21 CFR 520.2098 to reflect 
the change of sponsor.

List of Subjects

 21 CFR Part 510

    Administrative practice and procedure, Animal drugs, Labeling, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

21 CFR Parts 520

    Animal drugs.
    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and 
redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR parts 510 and 
520 are amended as follows:

PART 510--NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

    1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 510 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 360b, 371, 379e.


Sec. 510.600  [Amended]

    2. Section 510.600 Names, addresses, and drug labeler codes of 
sponsors of approved applications is amended in the table in paragraph 
(c)(1) by removing the entry for ``Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc.''; and 
in the table in paragraph (c)(2) by removing the entry for ``063248''.

PART 520--ORAL DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

    3. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 520 continues to read as 
follows:

     Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.


Sec. 520.2098  [Amended]

    4. Section 520.2098 Selegiline hydrochloride tablets is amended in 
paragraph (b) by removing ``063248'' and by adding in its place 
``000069''.


    Dated: May 12, 1998.
Andrew J. Beaulieu,
Acting Director, Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation, Center for 
Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 98-14299 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.
ACTION: Notice to delete systems of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary proposes to delete three systems 
of records notices from its inventory of records systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.
DATES: The deletions will be effective on June 12, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to OSD Privacy Act Coordinator, Records 
Section, Directives and Records Division, Washington Headquarter 
Services, Correspondence and Directives, 1155 Defense Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20301-1155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Bosworth at (703) 695-0970 
or DSN 225-0970.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of the Secretary of Defense 
notices for systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register 
and are available from the address above.
    The proposed action is not within the purview of subsection (r) of 
the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which would require the 
submission of a new or altered system report.
    Dated: June 8, 1998.

L. M. BYNUM,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Deletions:
DWHS P09

System name:
    Computer Data Base (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10227).
    Reason: These records are covered under the OPM Government-wide 
system of records notice OPM/GOVT-1, General Personnel Records.
DWHS P39

System name:
    Clerical Merit Promotion File (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10227).
    Reason: Records are no longer needed for perform an agency 
function. Records have been destroyed.
DODDS 25

System name:
    DODDS Internal Review Office Project File (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 
10227).
    Reason: These records are covered under the DoD Inspector General 
system of records CIG-16, entitled DoD Hotline Program Case Files 
(February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10213).
[FR Doc. 98-15625 Filed 6-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-F
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of
PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Howard G. Phanstiel,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:



| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
    of 1934; and                                                                                                                                         
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
    the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and
    results of operations of the Company for the period covered by
    the Report.



| |                                                                  
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ HOWARD G. PHANSTIEL                                          
| | _______________________________________ 
     Howard G. Phanstiel
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer                        

Date: March 25, 2003
# Agency head visits K-town property disposal crew 

/ Published Oct. 4, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
A pair of employees recently got “coined” when Defense Logistics Agency Director Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic visited the team at DLA Disposition Services’ site in Kaiserslautern, Germany, for the first time Sept. 28.

Birgit Feltman, a “consummate teammate,” was honored for her stellar effort serving as a site sales technician during the past year and a half. Feltman was cited for her willingness to learn and contribute to all aspects of the site’s property disposal mission while still “picking, verifying and packing” nearly 9,000 items for sales on 37 commercial orders and loading more than 50 commercial trucks. As a result of her can-do attitude and effort, the “jack of all trades” received a promotion to higher grade in April.

John Brown was also honored for contributions he made during a temporary promotion to site operations chief and while filling in as property management branch supervisor. During his stint as supervisor, Brown was instrumental in the reduction of average time from shipment receipt to induction into the accountable record from 38 days to just five. That effort also helped reduce the site’s total daily production workload of unprocessed receipts from 22 days to less than five, meeting the command’s established Business Process Review goal. 

“It was motivating to see the interaction between Admiral Skubic and everyone at the site,” said Area Manager Jeff Livingston. “She made everyone feel valued for their contribution to the warfighter.”

During Skubic’s visit, Livingston provided a tour of the site’s warehouse, demonstrations at its demilitarization center, and briefed the agency director on the sub-command’s support for OPERATION ALLIES REFUGE, the DOD effort to airlift U.S. embassy personnel, Afghan Special Immigrant Visa applicants, interpreters, and those deemed to be at-risk.

Outgoing region Director Tina Maier led the agency’s property disposal efforts throughout Europe and Africa and shared information with the admiral on the support operations and challenges the sub-command faces throughout the two continents. The region includes permanent facilities in Germany, Spain, Italy, England, Turkey, Portugal, and Djibouti.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Matthew Felix, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 918]

*536Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered December 13, 2001, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in removing the defendant from the courtroom for a relatively brief portion of the trial after an angry outburst. He repeatedly requested to leave the courtroom, and unequivocally told the court that if he remained he would not comply with its directions *(see People v Parker,*57 NY2d 136, 141 [1982]; *People v Johnson,*37 NY2d 778 [1975]). Furthermore, the Supreme Court properly declined defense counsel’s request for an additional CPL 730.30 (1) competency examination of the defendant after this outburst *(see People v Farhn,*300 AD2d 599 [2002]; *People v Bannister,*284 AD2d 404 [2001]). Two psychiatrists found the defendant fit to proceed prior to trial, and the Supreme Court had observed that the defendant fully understood the proceedings and was able to communicate with counsel *(see People v Tortorici,*92 NY2d 757, 766, 768 [1999], *cert denied*528 US 834 [1999]; *People v Savona,*176 AD2d 362 [1991]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
# DLA Troop Support spearheads military maternity uniform pilot program

/ Published April 25, 2022
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support is spearheading a new military maternity uniform pilot program, along with the military services, to provide pregnant members uniforms at no cost.

Each military service will implement their own version of the Congress-directed program, and DLA will ensure uniform items are available, said DLA Troop Support Clothing and Textiles Director of Customer Operations Bruce Carson.

“The intent is to have a program where a service member can be issued a uniform, wear it, turn it back in and it will be reissued,” Carson said.

While the pilot program provides immediate savings to pregnant servicemembers through the no-cost exchange program, it will also evaluate whether there is an overall cost savings for the military in implementing this system.

The Navy has been issuing utility and dress uniforms under the maternity pilot program since January. So far, 101 service members are participating within and outside of the continental U.S., Carson said.

During calendar year 2022, the Navy MPP program will be available to 400 sailors.

Each participant will receive the full maternity seabag of 10 items including sewn-on embroidery for working uniforms and rank insignia for enlisted E1-E6 dress uniforms, said Navy Cmdr. Terri Gabriel, Navy Exchange Service Command Deputy Commander Uniform Programs. Hemming and shipment are also free of charge.

NEXCOM manages the inventory of maternity uniform items, coordinates the tailoring and mailing of the uniform items and tracks the uniforms for return and possible re-issue through its Southeast Distribution Center in Pensacola, Florida, Gabriel said.

“NEXCOM also stays in contact with each participant, first to verify receipt of their uniforms and to ensure all items are correct,” Gabriel said. “The participant is then contacted every three months to check the satisfaction level throughout the course of the member’s pregnancy.”

Gabriel said the DLA team has been very helpful ensuring full support of the program.

The Marine Corps also initiated the maternity uniform pilot program in March. The Army, Air Force and Coast Guard are also on track to implement the program in 2022, Carson said.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14969]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. EC96-19-027 and ER96-1663-028]


The California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of 
Filing

May 29, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 19, 1998, the California Independent System 
Corporation (ISO), filed for Commission acceptance in the above 
referenced docket, pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, an 
application to amend the ISO Tariff, including the ISO Protocols 
(Amendment No. 8), and a motion for waiver of the 60-day notice 
requirement. The ISO requests that proposed Amendment No. 8, be made 
effective as of May 19, 1998, and that the Commission take expedited 
action with respect to Amendment No. 8.
    The ISO states that Amendment No. 8, would provide an interim 
Regulation Energy payment adjustment to address reliability problems 
arising from insufficient Regulation reserves bids in the ISO's 
Ancillary Services market. Amendment No. 8, also proposed various 
related clarifying changes.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before June 8, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14969 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick 

MARY MARGARET REUBEN, F/K/A 

 TAYO MARGARET FADAHUNSI 

v. Record No. 2516-96-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES, INC. JANUARY 21, 1997 

AND 

RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Mary Margaret Reuben, pro se, on brief). 

 No brief for appellees. 

 Mary Margaret Reuben, f/k/a Tayo Margaret Fadahunsi, 

(claimant) appeals from a September 13, 1996 Workers' 

Compensation Commission (commission) decision. In its September 

13, 1996 opinion, the commission held that it did not have 

jurisdiction to hear claimant's request for review because she 

did not file her request within twenty days after the deputy 

commissioner's August 15, 1996 opinion. Upon reviewing 

claimant's brief and employer's motion to dismiss, we find that 

this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm 

the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. 

 Code § 65.2-705 requires that an application for review to 

the full commission must be made within twenty days from the date 

of the award. Absent fraud or mistake, the decisions of the 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

commission or its deputy commissioners from which no party seeks 

timely review are binding upon the commission. K & L Trucking 

Co. v. Thurber, 1 Va. App. 213, 219, 337 S.E.2d 299, 302 (1985). 

 Claimant's request for review was not received by the 

commission until September 6, 1996, more than twenty days after 

the deputy commissioner's August 15, 1996 opinion. Therefore, 

the commission did not err in holding that it lacked jurisdiction 

to consider the request for review. For this reason, we do not 

address the substantive issues raised in claimant's brief, and we 

affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/02 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Qwest on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: January 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/RICHARD C. NOTEBAERT                                             
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |     |  | Richard C. Notebaert
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|Dated: January 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/OREN G. SHAFFER                                                  
|                        |  |     |  | Oren G. Shaffer
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer           

---

QuickLinks
No. 12-8318.

#### Mitchell *v.*California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
No. 09-10866.

#### Courtney Cobbs, Petitioner v. William Pollard, Warden.

562 U.S. 854, 131 S. Ct. 115,

178 L. Ed. 2d 71,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6261.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under	EO	

12866	and	EO	13563	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.

Interagency	Comments	on	U.S.	Environmental	Protection	Agency	(EPA)	draft	regulatory	

action titled,	“Proposed	Finding	that	Greenhouse	Gas	Emissions	from	Aircraft	Cause	or	

Contribute	to	Air	Pollution	that	May	Reasonably	Be	Anticipated	to	Endanger	Public	Health	

and	Welfare	and	Advance	Notice	of	Proposed	Rulemaking,”		RIN	2060-AS31

 p. 19 -- Delete the sentence “For example, the assessment reports find that climate change poses 

particular threats to indigenous peoples’ health, well-being, and ways of life,” because it doesn’t 

actually provide an example of anything and is redundant.

 P. 20 -- There’s an extra space in “impacts , raising environmental justice concerns.”

 P. 94 – Sentence currently reads: “The most recent assessments now have greater confidence in the 

likelihood that climate change would influence production of pollen, which in turn could affect 

asthma and other allergic respiratory illnesses such as allergic rhinitis, as well as effects on 

conjunctivitis and dermatitis.” Change to: “The most recent assessments now express greater 

confidence in the likelihood that climate change will influence production of pollen, which in turn 

could affect the incidence of asthma and other allergic respiratory illnesses such as allergic rhinitis, as 

well as effects on conjunctivitis and dermatitis.”

 P. 142 and 159 – FNs are identical and both are pretty incomprehensible, but I’ll let it go ;-)

 P. 161 – no comments.
#### Latonia W., Matter of (Anthony W.)

4th Dept: 144 AD3d 1692

denied