alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
San Joaquin’s Keeney selected as Defense Logistics Agency Police Officer of the Year
 
  By Annette Silva, DLA Distribution San Joaquin Public Affairs
  Officer Chadrick Keeney of Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management, Security and Emergency Services, Police Services Branch, was selected as the 2021 DLA Police Officer of the Year. His primary responsibility is to ensure the safety and security of persons and property at DLA San Joaquin, California. This includes responding to intrusion alarms, fire alarms, calls for service ranging from criminal activity to responding to medical and environmental emergencies as a first responder. He is also responsible for controlling access into the installation through positive identification and inspections of vehicles utilizing proper vetting methods in accordance with Department of Defense and DLA policy. Hitting challenges head-on that DLA Installation Management and Emergency Services faced over the year, Keeney stepped up to the plate by coming in early or staying over on his shift. He worked a total of 174 overtime hours to assist with working the control entry gates, conducting random access measures, and patrolling the installation. Keeney adapts very well to new situations and responds well to emergencies. Recently, he assisted with a report of a theft of government property from a high-profile program. During the investigation, he identified a possible suspect. The report was turned over to the local Office of the Inspector General for further investigation. As a veteran member of the department, Keeney clearly demonstrated extensive experience and skills which has been noticed throughout the police department and the DLA San Joaquin community. Keeney is an officer setting the example. He achieved a perfect attendance record for the past two years; the only officer out of 46 assigned to achieve this milestone. He qualified as expert with a score of 296 out of 300 during pistol qualifications. He is next in line to attend the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Firearms Instructor course in addition to becoming a field training officer. Keeney understand the meaning of supporting our warfighters. He retired after 23 years in the Army National Guard at the rank of staff sergeant. He enjoys volunteering out in his local community where he serves as a coach for youth football and baseball. “Officer Keeney exemplifies the model DLA police officer through his consistent efforts to perform his duties above all expectations,” said Deputy Police Chief Daniel Harrison. “He is dedicated and contributes immensely to the success of DLA’s mission.”
2017-0352.

#### State ex rel. Walker v. Erdos.

In Mandamus. On respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
No. 09-10216.

#### Deepak Jahagirdar, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 822, 131 S. Ct. 382,

178 L. Ed. 2d 17,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6574.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mediacom Capital Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rocco B. Commisso, Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|August 13, 2003 | By: | /s/ ROCCO B. COMMISSO                      
|--------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------
|                |     |                                            
|                |     | Rocco B. Commisso  Chief Executive Officer 
|                |     |                                            
|                | By: | /s/ MARK E. STEPHAN                        
|                |     |                                            
|                |     | Mark E. Stephan Principal Financial Officer
No. 09-10621.

#### Donnell Quarterman, Petitioner v. J. M. Blackwood, et al.

562 U.S. 847, 131 S. Ct. 94,

178 L. Ed. 2d 59,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5917.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Kids Stuff, Inc.
                                  Exhibit 10.24

                      AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO KIDS STUFF, INC.'S
                       1997 LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

     Section 5(b) of the 1997 Long-Term  Stock Incentive Plan is amended to read
as follows:

     "Each Option shall be  exercisable in full or in part at such time or times
as determined by the  Committee.  Unless  otherwise  provided in the Option,  an
Option, to the extent is it or becomes exercisable, may be exercised at any time
in whole or in part until the expiration or termination of the Option.  Any term
or  provision  in any  outstanding  Option  specifying  that the  Option  not be
immediately  exercisable  or  that  it be  exercisable  in  installments  may be
modified at any time during the life of the Option by the  Committee,  provided,
however,  no such  modifications  of an  outstanding  Option shall,  without the
consent of the optionee,  adversely affect any Option theretofore granted to the
optionee."
*October 17, 2017*

2017-Ohio-8204.]

1998-2061.

#### State v. Franklin.

Montgomery C.P. No. 97CR1139. On appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel. Motion denied.
No. 09-11375.

#### Juan Alfredo German-Espinal, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 876, 131 S. Ct. 186,

178 L. Ed. 2d 112,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6761.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
No. 09-11490.

#### Byron Van Branch, Jr., Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 883, 131 S. Ct. 208,

178 L. Ed. 2d 125,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6765.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 842.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30214-30215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2498-000]


Cobisa-Person Limited Partnership; Notice of Filing

May 28, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 18, 1998, Cobisa-Person Limited Partnership 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before June 4, 1998. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to

[[Page 30215]]

the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14642 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
32.1

MTS
SYSTEMS CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Sidney W. Emery Jr., the Chief
Executive Officer of MTS Systems Corporation (the Company), has executed this
Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: February 7, 2006

| |                                                 | 
| | ----------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Sidney W. Emery Jr.                         | 
| |                                                 | 
| | Sidney W. Emery Jr.                             | 
| | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | 

---
#### Locust Val. Cent. Sch. Dist. v Benstock

2d Dept: 144 AD3d 758 (Matter No. 1)

denied
No. 09-10603.

#### Troy Steinburger, Petitioner v. State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al.

562 U.S. 847, 131 S. Ct. 93,

178 L. Ed. 2d 58,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5819.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# Celebrating 74 years of airpower

/ Published Sept. 14, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
Even during a pandemic there are reasons to celebrate, and the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support found an important one Sept. 14: the 74th birthday of the U.S. Air Force.

During a morning staff meeting in Philadelphia, senior leaders and staff started the day with a story touching on the inception of the Air Force and its joint focus starting with the Doolittle Raiders five years before becoming a military service.

Air Force Col. Adrian Crowley, Director of Industrial Hardware, recounted the story of how Lt. Col. James Doolittle led a team of 16 aircraft and 80 aircrew members, then of the Army Air Forces, from a Navy ship to complete their storied bombing mission during World War II.

He tied the story to the mission and history of DLA Troop Support, present even then.

“Not only is it a nice joint story, as we are a joint organization, but there was a predecessor to DLA Troop Support [as it exists] today that certainly provided support to the military back then, to our customers then,” Crowley said.

Those present enjoyed a birthday cake cut by Crowley and Maj. Francisco Boral, the second oldest and fourth youngest USAF members serving at DLA Troop Support, respectively.

DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Eric P. Shirley was glad to have the opportunity to mark the occasion.

“Let’s all recognize ‘Fly Fight Win,’ and say happy birthday to our Air Force,” Shirley said.

The official birthday of the Air Force is Sept. 18, established in 1947 as the fourth branch of the military.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the amended Annual Report of Poet Holdings, Inc.
         (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2002
         as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
         (the "REPORT"), I, Ludwig Lutter, Chief Financial Officer of the
         Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
         pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: April 30, 2003
                                       /s/ Ludwig Lutter
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Ludwig Lutter
                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### Harry Mohinani et al., Respondents, v Tzlila Charney et al., Appellants.

[67 NYS3d 10]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered March 14, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the breach of contract, fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary duty, and accounting claims, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to defendants’ contention, the complaint alleges the existence of an enforceable agreement. It is clear that Charney agreed to provide plaintiffs with equity in defendant LHC Club *444LLC in exchange for their $4.5 million investment, and the specific terms governing plaintiffs’ rights are not so indefinite as to render the agreement unenforceable *(see Cobble Hill Nursing Home v Henry & Warren Corp.,*74 NY2d 475, 482-483 [1989], *cert denied*498 US 816 [1990]). Nor is the agreement as alleged “inherently incredible” *(see M & B Joint Venture, Inc. v Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.,*49 AD3d 258, 260, 262 n 2 [1st Dept 2008], *mod on other grounds*12 NY3d 798 [2009]; *Jamaica Pub. Serv. Co. v Compagnie Transcontinentale De Reassurance,*282 AD2d 227 [1st Dept 2001]).

Defendants failed to demonstrate as a matter of law that the complaint does not state a claim for fraudulent inducement. An issue of fact exists whether plaintiffs had “knowledge of New York real estate or United States laws, customs or business practices with respect to real estate or investments” *(Roni LLC v Arfa,*18 NY3d 846, 849 [2011] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Thus, an issue of fact exists whether plaintiffs were sophisticated parties who can be charged with heightened due diligence obligations *(see ACA Fin. Guar. Corp. v Goldman, Sachs & Co.,*25 NY3d 1043, 1046-1047 [2015]; *HSH Nordbank AG v UBS AG,*95 AD3d 185, 194-195 [1st Dept 2012]). Questions exist whether the alleged statements and omissions that induced plaintiffs to invest their money pertained to matters peculiarly within Charney’s knowledge, and, thus, whether plaintiffs could have discovered them even with the exercise of due diligence *(see ACA Fin. Guar. Corp.,*25 NY3d at 1044-1045; *HSH Nordbank AG,*95 AD3d at 194-195; *see also Pludeman v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc.,*10 NY3d 486, 491-492 [2008]). To the extent some branches of the fraud claim may be duplicative of the breach of contract claim *(see Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. R.R. Co.,*70 NY2d 382, 389-390 [1987]), it would be premature to dismiss them at this juncture.

The complaint alleges a fiduciary relationship between Charney, as the promoter of a real estate investment opportunity, and plaintiffs, as passive investors in the project *(see Roni,*18 NY3d at 848).

In view of their alleged fiduciary relationship with Charney and their allegations that Charney did not provide a full accounting even after protracted discovery, plaintiffs are entitled to pursue their claim for an equitable accounting and related costs (see *Adam v Cutner & Rathkopf,*238 AD2d 234 [1st Dept 1997]).

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.6


                              POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned hereby appoints Robert T. Slezak as his agent and
attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form
10-K relating to the year ending September 25, 1998, and any amendments
thereto, required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
Ameritrade Holding Corporation.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the 24th day of November, 1998.





/s/ David W. Garrison
---------------------
David W. Garrison, Director
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alexander Adams, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 880]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J. at suppression hearing; Ronald Zweibel, J. at plea, sentence, and re-sentence), rendered on or about January 8, 2015 and December 7, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Singh and Moulton, JJ.
No. 10-5076.

#### Jason P. Gold, Petitioner v. Linda Schuette.

562 U.S. 902, 131 S. Ct. 237,

178 L. Ed. 2d 158,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6393.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Price of Gulf Gateway Natural Gas LNG Imports from Trinidad and Tobago (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Price of Gulf Gateway Natural Gas LNG Imports from Trinidad and Tobago (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 7.31   | 7.30   | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER97-4829-000; and ER97-4830-000]


PP&L, Inc.; Notice of Filing

Janaury 16, 1998.
    Take notice that on December 22, 1997, PP&L, Inc., tendered for 
filing its response to requests by the Commission for additional 
information in the above proceedings. PP&L, Inc., also states that it 
proposes to make certain changes to the tariff sheets for which PP&L 
sought approval in Docket No. ER97-4830-000, and that it requests that 
the Commission approve and accept for filing those changed tariff 
sheets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before January 27, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1584 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
August 26, 2014,

Mr. Brent D. Bowen

Embry Riddle Aeronautical University

3700 Willow Creek Rd.

Prescott, AZ 86301

Dear: Mr. Bowen:

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for 

exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it.

We Have the Petition

We have received your July 7, 2014 petition on behalf Embry Riddle Aeronautical University

(ERAU) for an exemption from §§ 61.160(b)(1) and 61.160(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would allow certain students that complete 

non-aviation degrees and at least one aviation minor at ERAU to be eligible for the restricted 

privileges airline transport pilot (ATP) certificate.

We have added your petition to the public docket No. FAA-2014-0461 and we are processing 

it. We will contact you if we need additional information.

How We Will Process the Petition

A petition for an exemption, according to § 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 

120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a 

summary of the petition in the Federal Register for public comment unless, according to 

§ 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it.
2

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions in the meantime, you may contact me at (202) 493-5260.

Sincerely,

/s/

Alphonso W. Pendergrass

Transportation Industry Analyst

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division
3

Project No.: AFS-14-074-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-207:A Pendergrass: 01/08/14:Doc#37661

ARM-1/200:Program Office AFS-300

MR CARL ALLEN

HORIZON AIR

8030 NE AIRTRAINS WAY

PORTLAND OR 97128