alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1523V

UNPUBLISHED

AMELIA LUNDY,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: April 16, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Colleen Clemons Hartley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for 

Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On October 2, 2019, Amelia Lundy filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on 

October 17, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of 

the Office of Special Masters.

On April 16, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, Respondent “has determined that [P]etitioner’s medical course is consistent 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

with a [SIRVA] as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 3. Respondent further 

agrees that Petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six 

months. Id. at 4.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
162 A.3d 288

#### IN THE MATTER OF MUHAMMAD BASHIR, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW(ATTORNEY NO. 032321985)

June 15, 2017

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-197, concluding that MUHAMMAD BASHIR, formerly of ELIZABETH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since July 27, 2015, pursuant to the Order of the Court filed June 24, 2015, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.4(b)(failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information) and *RPC*1.4(c)(failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed *331decisions regarding the representation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MUHAMMAD BASHIR is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that MUHAMMAD BASHIR remain suspended from the practice of law pursuant to the Order of the Court filed June 24, 2015 (D-135-14; 076135), pending his compliance with the fee arbitration determination entered in District Docket No. XII-2013-0029F, and his payment of the sanction in the amount of $500 to the Disciplinary Oversight Committee, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
Exhibit 32.1

                         THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY
                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                SECTION 906
                                  OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The
Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  May 13, 2005

                                         /S/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                        Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                        President and
                                        Chairman of the Board
No. 09-1525.

#### Logan T. Johnston, III, Petitioner v. Melvin Sternberg, et al.

562 U.S. 831, 131 S. Ct. 180,

178 L. Ed. 2d 42,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6338.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 595 F.3d 937.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David J. Lavalley, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 439]

Devine, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered April 6, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated and waived his right to appeal. Under the terms of the plea agreement, defendant was required to participate in the judicial diversion program with the understanding that, if he failed to successfully complete the program, he could be sentenced to up to four years in prison. Defendant was thereafter terminated from the program and County Court sentenced him to DA to 4 years in prison. Defendant now appeals and we affirm.

Defendant validly waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence. County Court explained that the right to appeal was separate and distinct from the rights forfeited by a guilty plea and defendant affirmed his understanding of the waiver. Contrary to defendant’s contention that the appeal waiver was limited and allowed a challenge to the severity of his sentence, the record reflects that he signed a detailed written waiver in open court stating that it included any challenge to the sever*1340ity of the sentence (see *People v Yaw,*120 AD3d 1447, 1448 [2014], *lv denied*24 NY3d 1005 [2014]; *People v Fling,*112 AD3d 1001, 1002 [2013], *lv denied*23 NY3d 1020 [2014]; *cf. People v Maracle,*19 NY3d 925, 927-928 [2012]). While it would have been better practice for County Court to have confirmed that defendant had discussed the waiver with counsel and had read the written waiver before signing it, the relevant facts and circumstances—including defendant’s prior experience with the criminal justice system, the oral colloquy and the detailed written waiver—demonstrate that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence *(see People v Sanders, 25*NY3d 337, 341-342 [2015]; *People v Empey,*144 AD3d 1201, 1202-1203 [2016], *lv denied*28 NY3d 1144 [2017]; *People v Lester,*141 AD3d 951, 952-953 [2016], *lv denied*28 NY2d 1185 [2017]). Accordingly, the valid waiver precludes his claim that his sentence is harsh and excessive *(People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; *People v Oddy,*144 AD3d 1322, 1323 [2016]).

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
No. 09-1459.

#### South Carolina, Petitioner v. Kenneth Navy.

562 U.S. 834, 131 S. Ct. 141,

178 L. Ed. 2d 36,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5764.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.

Same case below, 386 S.C. 294, 688 S.E.2d 838.
# Cal Guard member's civilian skills get troops to missions

/ Published May 14, 2020
SACRAMENTO, Calif., 
U.S. Army Spc. Koby Riggan is finding himself working long hours and covered in grease from head to toe, but loving every minute of it.Riggan, a Soldier in the California Army National Guard, is working out of Field Maintenance Shop 22 in Sacramento, providing basic maintenance on vehicles in the Cal Guard’s inventory. As a Guard member, he’s been called up during the COVID-19 pandemic while the California National Guard is actively serving in the community performing humanitarian missions.What’s unique about his supporting role during the pandemic is that he is not a military-trained mechanic. He is a trained and qualified radio communications technician with the 270th Military Police Company.Unlike their active-duty counterparts, traditional Guard members often have civilian jobs that bring additional skills and utility to their units. When Spc. Riggan is not in uniform, his full-time job is as a lube technician for a Sacramento car dealership.With Guard troops driving up and down the state for a variety of COVID-19 missions, such as supporting food banks, more vehicles need to be repaired. The 270th Military Police Company's readiness noncommissioned officer knew of Riggan’s civilian background and assigned him to the maintenance shop.Because of the pandemic, he was furloughed at his civilian job. When California Gov. Gavin Newsom activated the Guard, some out-of-work service members like Riggan were able to replace their civilian employment with roles in the Cal Guard supporting the state’s relief efforts. Riggan, who provides for his wife and two children while caring for his mother and ailing father, is grateful for the opportunity.Not every vehicle that needs maintenance is a complete overhaul, and that is where Spc. Riggan comes in. He has been working diligently to service vehicles that need a basic level of wrench turning and battery swapping. “Since I have been here, I’ve become more proficient and able to do more things, like replace a water pump or a starter,” said Riggan. His assistance frees up the trained mechanics to tackle the bigger jobs and turn over vehicles faster.Riggan said he might not be directly helping out civilians, but he did help his fellow Guard members get to food banks by keeping their vehicles running. “I did help get them there, so no matter what, even if you are in the rear, you’re still helping someone out,” he said.The National Guard requires a commitment of one weekend a month and two weeks a year to fulfill the contractual obligation of service. The time committed tends to fall on many occasions, such as birthdays and anniversaries, and can disrupt family plans.“I have spent time away because of military duty, but during this activation, I get to come home to my family, have dinner with my wife and kids, and that makes me feel good to help out and still be with my family,” he said.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the National Guard website.*
Exhibit 13.1

Section 906 Certification

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report)
for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Oscar von Chrismar, the Chief Executive Officer and David Turiel, the Chief Financial Officer of Banco Santander-Chile, each certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and                                                            
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Banco Santander-Chile.
|  

April 12,
2006

By:
      /s/
          Oscar von ChrismarName:
      Oscar von ChrismarChief Executive Officer


By:
      /s/
          David TurielName:
      David TurielChief Financial Officer


---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14956]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: United States Enrichment Corporation.

SUBJECT: Board of Directors Meeting.

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday-Wednesday, June 2-3, 1998, commencing at 8:00 
a.m., Tuesday, June 2, 1998.

PLACE: USEC Corporate Headquarter, 6903 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20817.

STATUS: Portions of the Board meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Issues related to the privatization of the 
Corporation and other commercial, financial and operational issues of 
the Corporation.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elizabeth Stuckle at 301/564-3399

    .Dated: June 2, 1998.
William H. Timbers, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-14956 Filed 6-2-98; 10:19 am]
BILLING CODE 8720-01-M
#### Carr v. Buenger

CAAP-11-0000545

05/30/2014

Affirmed
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Kerry R. Hicks, President and Chief Executive Officer of Health Grades, Inc., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Health Grades, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 31, 2006        By: /s/ Kerry R. Hicks           Name: Kerry R. Hicks     Title: President and CEO
2017-1769.

#### State v. Arnold.

Cuyahoga App. No. 106862. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
*May 30, 2017*

2017-Ohio-4024.]

2017-0169.

#### Brinker v. Frontier N., Inc.

Summit App. No. 27962, 2016-Ohio-8279. On appellee’s motion to strike notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction. Motion denied. Appellee may file a memorandum in response within 30 days.
CORPORATE RESOLUTION

Universal Property Acquisition and Development Corporation., a Nevada
corporation (the "Corporation"), certifies that pursuant to the authority
contained in Article II of its Amended Articles of Incorporation, and in
accordance with the provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes, its Board of
Directors has adopted the following resolution creating a series of Convertible
Preferred Stock.

RESOLVED, that, pursuant to authority conferred upon the Board of Directors by
the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, the Board of Directors hereby
authorizes the issuance of 200,000 shares Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
of the Corporation and hereby designates, pursuant to Section 78.195 of the
Nevada Revised Statutes, the rights, preferences, privileges, restrictions and
other matters relating to each share of such Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock as follows:

o has a par value, stated value and liquidation preference of $10.00;

o does not pay a dividend;

o may be converted at the election of the holder into 1000 shares of common
stock (subject to anti-dilution adjustments in the event of a distribution,
combination, reorganization, recapitalization, or similar transaction), in
accordance with the following schedule:

(i) Each holder may convert up to one-third of the original number of shares of
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held by the holder into Common Stock at any
time after 30 days after the date of issuance.

(ii) Each holder may convert an additional one-third of the original number of
shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held by the holder into Common
Stock at any time after six months after the date of issuance.

(iii) Each holder may convert the balance of the original number of shares of
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held by the holder into Common Stock at any
time after one year after the date of issuance. o must be converted by the
holder, at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, if the
common stock trades above $3.00 per share for 20 consecutive trading days.

o may be voted on all matters on an as-converted basis; and

o may be voted as a class on any merger, share exchange, recapitalization,
dissolution, liquidation or change in control of the Corporation.
RESOLVED this 1st day of July, 2005


-------------------------------------
Kamal Abdallah, Chairman


-------------------------------------
Christopher J. McCauley, Secretary
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terry J. Paige, Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 816]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered March 22, 2013, as amended April 11, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 12 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, which forecloses review of his suppression claim. The court’s oral colloquy with defendant concerning the waiver, which carefully separated the right to appeal from the rights normally forfeited upon a guilty plea, met or exceeded the minimum standards for such a colloquy *(see People v Bryant,*28 NY3d 1094 [2016]). Furthermore, it was supplemented by a detailed written waiver, which defendant plainly understood notwithstanding his previous, patently false claim of illiteracy.

Regardless of whether defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, we find that the court properly denied his suppression motion. The officers’ stop of defendant was based on a description of a robber that was sufficiently specific to provide reasonable suspicion, given the spatial and temporal proximity between the robbery and the police encounter.

Concur— Sweeny, J.R, Moskowitz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
# DLA Troop Support bids farewell to retiring civilian employee

/ Published March 2, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support bid a fond farewell to a civilian employee during a retirement ceremony Feb. 25 in Philadelphia.

Pama Hamlett of the Subsistence supply chain retired after 41 years of federal service. She was joined virtually by family, friends and coworkers during the ceremony.

DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Gavin Lawrence presided over the ceremony.

“Pama, I want to thank you for allowing us the opportunity to formally bid you farewell, and to thank you for your 41 years of dedicated service to this nation,” Lawrence said.

He also thanked her for her “outstanding job in providing responsive support to our DLA customers and warfighters” throughout her career.

Lawrence presented Hamlett with a certificate of retirement, DLA Troop Support mementos and a commander’s coin. A certificate of appreciation was also presented to Hamlett’s partner, Gary Weller.

Hamlett started her career with the federal government working for the Air Force and Army before taking a position with the Defense Personnel Support Center in the Defense Subsistence Office as a customer support specialist.  After the DSO closed, she became a traffic management specialist with the Defense Distribution Center, Theater Consolidation and Shipping Point in Camp Arifjan, Kuwait. Hamlett said working during Operation Enduring Freedom was one of the most rewarding experiences of her career. Following this job, she worked for the Subsistence supply chain as a tailored vendor logistics specialist. She is retiring as a field representative customer specialist.

“It’s been a pleasure for me to work with the federal government for 41 years,” Hamlett said. “It’s been a wonderful career, and I have had the privilege of working with many wonderful people.”
Decided September 7, 2017

#### Blue Is. Dev., LLC v Town of Hempstead

Sup Ct, Nassau County, 1/25/17 (143 AD3d 656)

denied
160 A.3d 706

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PIETRO J. PARISI, JR., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.