alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request

January 14, 1998.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0145.
    Form Number: IRS Form 2439.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Notice to Shareholder of Undistributed Long-Term Capital 
Gains.
    Description: Form 2439 is sent by regulated investment companies 
and real estate investment trusts to report undistributed capital gains 
and the amount of tax paid on these gains designated under IRC section 
852(b)(3)(D) or 857(b)(3)(D). The company, the trust, and the 
shareholder file copies of Form 2439 with IRS. IRS uses the information 
to check shareholder compliance.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 8,363.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:
    Recordkeeping--2 hr., 52 min.
    Learning about the law or the form--35 min.
    Preparing and sending the form to the IRS--40 min.
    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 34,539 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-1502 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 13.1



Section 906 Certification



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Oscar von Chrismar, the Chief Executive Officer and David Turiel, the Chief
Financial Officer of Banco Santander-Chile, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Banco Santander-Chile.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



June 30, 2005



By:

/s/ Oscar von ChrismarName:

Oscar von ChrismarChief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ David TurielName:

David TurielChief Financial Officer
# L_2015303EN.01010801.xml

| 20.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 303/108 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 303/108

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2011/848/CFSP of 16 December 2011 implementing Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 335 of 17 December 2011
  )

On page 83, signature:

for:

‘
  For the Council

The President

T. NALEWAJK
  ’,

read:

‘
  For the Council

The President

M. SAWICKI
  ’.

---
No. 09-1214.

#### Babajide Sobitan, Petitioner v. Lori Glud, et al.

562 U.S. 828, 131 S. Ct. 73,

178 L. Ed. 2d 25,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6348.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 589 F.3d 379.
No. 09-1406.

#### David Boylen Manley, Petitioner v. Jeff Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

562 U.S. 832, 131 S. Ct. 388,

178 L. Ed. 2d 31,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6397.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*32Same case below, 366 Fed. Appx. 734.
163 A.3d 872

#### IN THE MATTER OF DAVID A. WALKER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 020951983)

July 7, 2017

ORDER

DAVID A. WALKER, formerly of PLAINFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, having pleaded guilty in the Superior Court of New Jersey to conspiracy to facilitate the crime of using a runner in violation of *N.J.S.A.*2C:21-22.1 and *N.J.S.A.*2C:5-2, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*1:20—13(b)(1), DAVID A. WALKER is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID A. WALKER be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID A. WALKER comply with *Rule*1:20— 20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this state.
160 A.3d 713

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEROY TUTT, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. BRUCE DUETTE (A/K/A BRUCE DEWITT), DEFENDANT.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-4042/5558-12 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
---

---

# Exhibit 15.2

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of DirectorsElbit Imaging Ltd.:

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements (No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852 , No. 333-136684
and No. 333-152820) on Form S-8 of Elbit Imaging Ltd. of our report dated June 25, 2009
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Plaza Centers N.V. as of December 31,
2008 and 2007 and the consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 20-F of Elbit
Imaging Ltd.

|/s/ 
KPMG Hungária Kft. Budapest, Hungary
|-------------------------------------------------------

June 25, 2009



---

---
#### In the Matter of Brandon D., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 237]—

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Adetokunbo O. Fasanya, J.), entered on or about June 8, 2016, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second and third degrees, obstructing governmental administration in the second degree and resisting arrest, and placed him on probation for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*436The court’s determination that appellant committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second and third degrees, obstructing governmental administration in the second degree and resisting arrest was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see Matter of Luis L.,*58 AD3d 543, 544 [1st Dept 2009], citing *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The testimony firmly established that appellant assaulted a police officer and interfered with an arrest while the officer was performing her official function *(Matter of Davan L.,*91 NY2d 88 [1997]). His physical intrusion and actions were not justified, nor can they be excused simply because it was his mother who was being arrested and he was upset. Appellant also resisted arrest when the police attempted to handcuff him.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in placing appellant on probation for a period of 12 months *(see*Family Ct Act § 352.2 [1] [b]; *Matter of Cindy A.,*31 AD3d 440 [2d Dept 2006]). The court appropriately took into account the nature of the incident, the Department of Probation’s recommendation that appellant would benefit from probation, the appellant’s poor school performance, and his attendance and disciplinary record, and made its determination, despite the fact that this was appellant’s first offense *(Matter of Javed*K., 57 AD3d 899 [2d Dept 2008]).

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Andrias, Gische, Kern and Singh, JJ.
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. & 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Royal
Standard Minerals Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief,
the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2013, which
accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Royal Standard Minerals Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The
foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The
undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing
certification except as required by law.

|Dated: June 14, 2013        | 
|--------------------------- | 
|                            | 
|/s/ Ike
      Makrimichalos | 
|Ike Makrimichalos           | 
|Chief Financial Officer     | 

---
BENNIE LEONARD MASSEY , Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2588

_____________________________/ Opinion filed March 4, 2016. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela Cox , Judge

. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Mark Graham Hanson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. This appeal is brought under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Having reviewed the record on appeal, we find no preserved error in either2 Appellant’s judgment or sentence warranting reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. However, we note that Anders counsel pointed out a potentially meritorious but

u npreserved cost sentencing error in the initial Anders brief, but failed to take steps to either correct or preserve the error by filing a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) before this case was perfected and sent to the panel
for review. Accordingly, while we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence, we do so without prejudice to Appellant’s right to seek timely collateral relief. See Ramos
v. State , 156 So. 3d 591, 592 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (affirming unpreserved sentencing
error wi thout prejudice to defendant’s right to file appropriate post

- conviction motion). See also Collando

- Pena v. State , 141 So. 3d 229, 230

- 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).
It is so ordered.
LEWIS , OSTERHAUS , and KELSEY , J J

. , CONCUR.
# DLA HR director speaks at Aviation Leadership Forum

/ Published April 10, 2019
Richmond, Va, 
Members of Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Leadership Working Group invited DLA Human Resources Director Brad Bunn to speak at their April 1 forum on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia.

The forum began by recognizing Dashia Chandler, who was nominated by her employee to receive the DLA Aviation Leadership Award. Chandler is a supervisor in the Contract Administration Division of DLA Aviation’s Supplier Operations Original Equipment Manufacturer Directorate.

In the nomination, Chandler was recognized as “exuding a premier level of confidence and compassion that allows her team, new and seasoned, to feel valued and supported.” Among other attributes, her servant leadership style was highlighted as well as her efforts to groom the next generation of DLA leaders by example, by enabling, and by promoting innovation and work/life balance to increase productivity.

After congratulating Chandler, Bunn, who has served as DLA’s HR director for the last 10 years, shared his thoughts on the DLA leadership landscape and the role of leaders focusing on the enterprises’ latest climate/culture results, using HR resources like DOD Performance Management and Appraisal Program (DPMAP) as a performance management tool, and also growing the next generation of leaders.

Bunn stressed to DLA Aviation leaders that performance management starts with managing ourselves and is relationship management.  He said it’s important to be proactive and recognize that performance management happens every day.

Bunn closed with highlighting DLA’s succession management process implemented this past March to “build the bench” within the enterprise and enable more effective risk mitigation for critical vacancies.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             458
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,648
<INVENTORY>                                        526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,960
<PP&E>                                          17,298
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 361,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,442
<BONDS>                                        122,193
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                     177,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   361,947
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,304
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                18,698
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,763
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,124
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,639
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


(Effective as of May 18, 2006)


 


Each non-employee director of the Company
will receive an annual retainer fee of $40,000, a $3,000 fee for each Board of
Directors meeting attended in-person and a $1,000 fee for each Board of
Directors meeting attended by telephone. The Chairman of the Board of Directors
will receive an additional annual retainer fee of $160,000. Each non-employee
director of the Company other than the Chairman of the Board of Directors also
will receive a special additional retainer fee in 2006 of $30,000 in
recognition of the substantially increased time commitment being required of
the directors. The Chairman of the Audit Committee will receive an annual
retainer fee of $25,000, an increase from $15,000. All other Committee Chairmen
will receive an annual retainer fee of $10,000. Each Committee member will
receive a $2,000 fee for each Committee meeting attended in-person and a $1,000
fee for each Committee meeting attended by telephone. Non-employee directors
also will receive an annual grant of options to purchase 3,800 shares of Common
Stock and an annual award of 1,500 shares of restricted stock under the 2005
Outside Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan. On a temporary basis — through the
conclusion of the currently increased level of Board of Directors and Committee
activities — the meeting fees will be increased by $2,000 for each in-person
Board of Directors meeting and by $1,000 for all other Board of Directors and
Committee meetings.
#### Com. v. Simeone

06/08/2016

80 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 668
#### Com. v. Wahl

04/06/2016

50 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 660
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 7, 2017

p0404

Order 

Clerk

April 7, 2017

154680

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154680

COA: 334003

Allegan CC: 15-019249-FC

KEVIN SCOTT VANRHEE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 8, 2016 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, C.J. (concurring)

For the reasons set forth in my concurring statement in People v Keefe, 498 Mich 

962 (2015), I believe the trial court erred by accepting a plea agreement between 

defendant and the prosecutor that purported to allow the court to impose a minimum 

sentence below the 25-year mandatory minimum sentence for a first-degree criminal 

sexual conduct conviction “committed by an individual 17 years of age or older against 

an individual less than 13 years of age . . . .” MCL 750.520b(2)(b). I continue to believe 

that a “plea bargain cannot be allowed to supersede the Legislature’s determination that a 

particular criminal offense is punishable by a mandatory minimum sentence.” Keefe, 498 

Mich at 965. Because MCL 750.520b(2)(b) provides for a mandatory minimum sentence 

of 25 years for the crime to which defendant pleaded guilty, the trial court did not possess 

the discretion to impose a minimum sentence less than 25 years, and the trial court erred 

by concluding that the parties’ plea agreement provided it that discretion. See 

MCL 769.34(2)(a) (“If a statute mandates a minimum sentence for an individual 

sentenced to the jurisdiction of the department of corrections, the court shall impose 

sentence in accordance with that statute.”) (emphasis added). However, since the trial 

court, albeit in an exercise of judicial discretion, decided that there were “substantial and 

compelling” reasons to depart upwardly from the guidelines to sentence defendant to a 

25-year minimum sentence, defendant ultimately received the sentence required by 

MCL 750.520b(2)(b). Accordingly, the trial court’s error here was harmless and I concur 

with the Court’s order denying leave to appeal.
#### State Employees' Retirement System v. Pennsylvanians for Union Reform

10/27/2015

281 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 113 A.3d 9
# Earth Day comes to life for children at DSCC

/ Published April 17, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
As Earth Day approaches, youth at the Morale, Welfare and Recreation Child Development Center learn about reuse, reduce and recycle.

                Nicole Goicochea, lead environmental protection specialist at the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, spoke with seven preschool and prekindergarten classrooms about the environment April 15. The discussion focused on landfills and why it’s important to reduce the amount of refuse generated.                            Earth Day comes to life for children at DSCC                            Nicole Goicochea, lead environmental protection specialist at the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, spoke with seven preschool and prekindergarten classrooms about the environment April 15. The discussion focused on landfills and why it’s important to reduce the amount of refuse generated.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Charles MorrisVIRIN: 190415-D-LC637-101Nicole Goicochea, lead environmental protection specialist at the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, spoke with seven preschool and prekindergarten classrooms about the environment April 15.

The discussion focused on landfills and why it’s important to reduce the amount of refuse generated.

“They’re already avid recyclers,” Goicochea said. “They also mentioned giving their old toys and clothes to children who need them.”

The Center has been working on interactive activities such as songs about recycling and crafts made from items that would have been otherwise destined for the landfill.

Additionally, children in these classrooms assist with the Center’s sensory and vegetable garden. The children are responsible for the upkeep of the garden from planting, weeding and maintaining, to harvesting and enjoying.

“I felt it was important for the kids to not only spend time outside, but to learn about their environment – where their food comes from, that water doesn’t just come from a faucet, that they can contribute to the environment,” Goicochea said.

For associates who want to volunteer, the CDC Garden Team provides support by weeding and helping maintain the MWR Child Development Center sensory garden.
#### People v Romero

2d Dept: 143 AD3d 876

denied