alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Tyjaa E. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Kareem McC., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

[66 NYS3d 12]

Order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper) of the Family Court, Bronx County (Robert D. Hettleman, J.), entered on or about January 18, 2017, insofar as it determined, after a hearing, that respondent father neglected one of the subject children and derivatively neglected the other, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The findings of neglect are supported by a preponderance of the competent evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i], [iii]; *see also Matter of Daphne G.,*308 AD2d 132, 135 [1st Dept 2003]). The record shows that the older child was subject to actual or imminent danger of injury or impairment of her emotional and mental condition from exposure to repeated incidents of domestic violence occurring in respondents’ small shelter apartment, including the precipitating incident, during which the father choked, kicked and stomped on the mother’s stomach, while she was pregnant with the younger child, in close proximity to the older child *(see Matter of Carmine G. [Franklin G.],*115 AD3d 594 [1st Dept 2014]; *Matter of Angie G. [Jose D.G.],*111 AD3d 404, 404-405 [1st Dept 2013]). Since the conduct that formed the basis for the finding of neglect as to the older child was proximate in time to the younger child’s birth, it can reasonably be concluded that the condition still existed *(see Matter of Jamarra S. [Jessica S.],*85 AD3d 803 [2d Dept 2011] [citations omitted]).

The medical records which included statements regarding *421domestic violence were properly admitted *(see People v Ortega,*15 NY3d 610, 619 [2010]), and accorded the proper weight *(see Matter of Miguel S.,*140 AD2d 202 [1st Dept 1988]). Further, the Family Court’s credibility determinations are entitled to deference on appeal and are supported by the record on appeal *(see Matter of Irene O.,*38 NY2d 776, 777-778 [1975]; *Matter of Aaron C. [Grace C.],*105 AD3d 548 [1st Dept 2013]).

Contrary to the father’s arguments, the court’s rulings were proper, and the denial of his general requests for adjournments were a provident exercise of the court’s discretion *(see Matter of Steven B.,*6 NY3d 888, 889 [2006]; *Matter of Anthony M.,*63 NY2d 270, 283-284 [1984]; CPLR 4011).

The father was afforded due process and was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712-714 [1998]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 146-147 [1981]). The father’s contention that he did not have sufficient opportunity to confer with trial counsel is unpreserved *(see People v Garay,*25 NY3d 62, 67 [2015], *cert denied*577 US —, 136 S Ct 501 [2015]), and unsupported. The court’s rulings limiting the scope of questioning at trial was likewise a provident exercise of discretion. The court properly proceeded to disposition in the absence of objection *(see Matter of Kasey Marie M.,*292 AD2d 190 [1st Dept 2002]).

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Bowles, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 876]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (W. Miller, J.), rendered December 17, 2015, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*536We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see *id., Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Rivera, J.R, Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
# Automated agent helps navigate disruptions and reduces downtime

/ Published Nov. 18, 2020

The Defense Logistics Agency is using the automated agent, Amelia, as the first contact for information technology support.

Since Nov. 1, all DLA customers needing IT assistance have been greeted by Amelia when calling the agency’s Enterprise Service Desk. Amelia is a software solution that supports DLA’s efforts in implementing IT solutions wherever feasible for cost savings and process improvements. 

Before calling DLA’s support number, external customers should register in DLA Single Point of Entry if they have not already done so. Registering allows Amelia to access customer information when creating a ticket. Customers need their Common Access Card numbers handy before placing the call. 

Moving to Amelia will help eliminate hold times during extremely high call volume incidents. She can support up to 300 concurrent sessions. This includes 180 chat sessions and 120 voice sessions. Depending on the type of problem, the self-help feature may assist in resolving IT issues in less time that it would take for a DLA technician to respond and provide assistance.

DLA employees have been using Amelia chat since mid-June to open incidents for J6 troubleshooting or work with a live agent for immediate help. Amelia is capable of handling some of DLA’s most common IT issues. As DLA works to fully integrate Amelia and increase her knowledge of DLA’s IT environment, we’ll be adding additional functionality to better serve customers.

Moving to an automated agent is the future of technology. In today’s world, DLA employees must stay one step ahead and build a culture of IT resiliency. Bringing in state-of-the-art technology to provide support is critical to DLA’s modernization and reform efforts.
No. 09-10432.

#### Pamela Hoskins-Harris, Petitioner v. Tyco/Mallinckrodt Healthcare, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 844, 131 S. Ct. 81,

178 L. Ed. 2d 53,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5918.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 334 Fed. Appx. 787.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Muniz, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 871]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ferdinand, J.), rendered January 19, 2016, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Rivera, J.P., Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
No. 12-8022.

#### Jones *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Com. v. Shaw

06/22/2016

99 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 598
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Kenneth L. Hignett, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan’s Foods, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of August 13, 2006, based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: September 27, 2006 /s/ Kenneth L. Hignett   Kenneth L. Hignett,   Senior Vice President,
# Shadow Program provides strong connections

/ Published Aug. 30, 2019
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
Program and Management Analyst Keisha High shadowed Defense Logistics Agency Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Albert Miller through the DLA Energy Shadow Program August 12-16.

High participated in bi-weekly regional command updates, Department of Defense auditing and cost transparency meetings. During her week of shadowing, she traveled with the general to meetings at the Pentagon and with the Army Corps of Engineers.

The experience provided her with a close look at what it takes to run the organization.

“DLA has many moving parts and each piece is important and requires decisions at the executive level,” High said. “The senior leaders essentially hold the success of the organization in their hands.”

The Shadow Program, established as part of DLA Energy’s employee development program, allows employees to choose the senior leader they want to shadow for professional development opportunities, networking and a broader understanding of the whole of DLA Energy, said Beverly Johnson, Strategic Communications Group, management and program analyst.

“The overall feedback has been great," she said. “The employees get to see first-hand what leaders do daily and the challenges they face. Most participants want more time shadowing their leader.”

High, who works on the military personnel team within the Manpower Division, said she gained awareness about the funds collected from fuel sales and how they are allocated throughout Energy and the DLA Enterprise.

“It gave me a perspective of how everything comes together,” she said. “I don’t work directly with fuel, therefore, learning about the places we service and potential problems we may face getting fuel where it needs to be to support the Warfighter was insightful.”

High applied to the shadow program and specifically requested the DLA Energy commander to better understand the demands of leadership at the senior level. 

Seeing how the general’s time is often not his own provided insight on the demands placed upon senior leaders, High said.

“The general has little down time to take in something as simple as a meal,” she said. “It’s a perspective I must consider as I continue my professional journey.”

High said the shadowing of a senior leader is an opportunity that would benefit any aspiring leader.

“Taking a seat in the commander’s chair is an experience you’ll learn from and appreciate,” she said.

Opportunities to shadow leaders are offered across the command throughout the year.

“Now in its second year, the shadow program continues to grow,” Johnson said. “Senior Leaders have hosted 10 employees since we announced the pilot in January 2018 with four shadow opportunities for the entire year. "We currently have three employees pending dates to shadow and we have a few months left before the close of the year.”

Employees interested in the Shadow Program can apply through the Strategic Communications Group (CAC required).
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 13.1

            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            --------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of Elbit Medical Imaging Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shimon
Yitzhaki, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date:  June 30, 2004

     /s/ Shimon Yitzhaki
     ---------------------------
     Shimon Yitzhaki
     Principal Executive Officer
Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Sexual Assault Response Coordinator provides education on prevention
 By Jeff Landenberger
  April is Sexual Assault awareness month, although Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Sexual Assault Response Coordinator Robin Rogers strives to raise awareness year-round. DLA Disposition Services Mid-America’s Leadership Summit invited Rogers to be one of the speakers and provide training at their March event held at the Red River Army Depot site in Texas. **Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Sexual Assault Response Coordinator Robin Rogers talks with the DSD Mid-America leadership Team during their summit at the Red River Army Depot, Texas site.




Robin Rogers in front of a slide screen giving training
        Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Sexual Assault Response Coordinator Robin Rogers
            Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Sexual Assault Response Coordinator Robin Rogers talks with the DSD Mid-America leadership Team during their summit at the Red River Army Depot, Texas site.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Jeff Landenberger
                    
                    VIRIN: 200224-D-YU183-341**"I travel to build relationships with employees and leaders and promote awareness,” Rogers said. “Sexual Assault can be a difficult subject to discuss, and I try to help people be more comfortable by having conversations that dispel myths, help understand victims, and just make the subject more relatable.” “My job as a SARC is to be an advocate for victims of sexual assault, and to provide coordination of resources and services from outside agencies and law enforcement,” Rogers said. “I also serve as a subject matter expert to our leadership on trends and issues, and provide education on prevention.” As April approaches, the SAPR program is exploring opportunities to continue the annual awareness program considering the recent shift to the primary virtual work environment.
“We are working on a virtual SAPR challenge that includes ways for people to participate and show their support,” Rogers said. “Information for events and activities will be distributed through various channels once the program is ready.” Associates can receive more information on the SAPR webpage or for 24/7 response, call 1-800-841-0937. https://www.dla.mil/Info/SAPR.aspx
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         The undersigned hereby appoints J. Peter Ricketts as his agent and
attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form
10-K relating to the year ending September 29, 2000, and any amendments thereto,
required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Ameritrade
Holding Corporation.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the 14th day of December, 2000.



/s/ Thomas Y. Hartley
---------------------------
Thomas Y. Hartley, Director
No. 09-1437.

#### Energy West, Inc., Petitioner v. Delores Tacke.

562 U.S. 833, 131 S. Ct. 131,

178 L. Ed. 2d 34,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6136.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.

Same case below, 355 Mont. 243, 227 P.3d 601.
EXHIBIT 21

CTG RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|Name of Subsidiary                             | Incorporated
Underthe Laws of | Percentage of Voting
Securities Owned ByImmediate Parent
|---------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------
|                                               |                               |                                                         
|Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation ("CNG")(1) | Connecticut                   | 100%                                                    
|CNG Realty Corp.                               | Connecticut                   | 100%                                                    
|The Greenwich Gas System, Inc.(2)              | Connecticut                   | 100%                                                    
|                                               |                               |                                                         
|The Energy Network, Inc.("TEN")(3)             | Connecticut                   | 100%                                                    
|The Hartford Steam Company                     | Connecticut                   | 100%                                                    
|ENI Gas Services, Inc.                         | Connecticut                   | 100%                                                    
|TEN Gas Services, Inc.                         | Connecticut                   | 100%                                                    
|TEN Transmission Company                       | Connecticut                   | 100%                                                    





(1) CNG Realty Corp. is a wholly owned subsidiary of CNG at September 30, 1999.



(2) The Greenwich Gas System, Inc.:  inactive.



(3) The Hartford Steam Company, ENI Gas Services, Inc., TEN Gas Services, Inc. and TEN Transmission Company are wholly owned subsidiaries of TEN at September 30, 1999.
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 
 I Peter
Roston , Chief
Financial Officer of Axion Power International, Inc certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Axion Power International,
      Inc; 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report; 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report; 
 4.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I, are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
      have: 
 a)
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared; 
 b)
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the
      "Evaluation Date"); and 
 c)
    presented
      in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
      controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date; 
 5.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent function): 
 d)
    all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and 
 e)
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and 
 6.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report
      whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
      other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
      to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
      actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
      weaknesses. 
  /s/
Peter Roston
  Peter
Roston, Chief Financial Officer
 Dated:
March 30, 2005
No. 09-9441.

#### Ahmed S. Majid, et ux., Petitioners v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 842, 131 S. Ct. 69,

178 L. Ed. 2d 48,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6078.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 336 Fed. Appx. 389.
#### Com. v. Jessee 13

08/23/2016

752 MAL (2015)

13

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 108