alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Timothy Braddock, Petitioner, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[50 NYS3d 278]

Determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA), dated September 15, 2014, which terminated petitioner’s tenancy on the grounds of nondesirability and breach of rules and regulations, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Alice Schlesinger, J.], entered November 12, 2015), dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner raised an issue of substantial evidence requiring transfer to this Court *(see*CPLR 7804 [g]), since he challenged the weight of the evidence and certain factual findings made by the hearing officer. The hearing officer’s determination is supported by substantial evidence *(see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 181-182 [1978]; *see also Matter of Hill v New York City Hous. Auth.,*111 AD3d 462, 462-463 [1st Dept 2013]).

The termination of petitioner’s tenancy is consistent with the law and proportionate to the offenses *(see Matter of Hill,*111 AD3d at 463; *see also Matter of Johnson v New York City Hous. Auth.,*111 AD3d 515, 516 [1st Dept 2013]). The hearing officer considered petitioner’s assertions regarding purported mitigating circumstances, but found them to be insufficient *(see Matter of Hairston v New York City Hous. Auth.,*144 AD3d 416, 417 [1st Dept 2016]). The hearing officer’s findings are sup*580ported by the record. By pleading guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, petitioner waived his right to have the hearing officer consider his motive for entering the plea *(see People v Taylor,*65 NY2d 1, 5 [1985]). Moreover, there is no evidence to support petitioner’s claim that the defaced revolver and ammunition recovered from his apartment belonged to his late uncle. Even if petitioner was unaware that the items were present in the apartment, he was, nonetheless, responsible for any criminal activity in the apartment (see *Matter of Grant v New York City Hous. Auth.,*116 AD3d 531, 531, 533 [1st Dept 2014]).

Petitioner failed to preserve his arguments regarding NYCHA’s termination procedures, because he never raised them at the administrative level *(see Matter of Hairston,*144 AD3d at 417).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
No. 09-10885.

#### Louis Robenson, Petitioner v. R. J. Bonshall, et al.

562 U.S. 803, 131 S. Ct. 117,

178 L. Ed. 2d 4,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7729.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari *5to the Supreme Court of Florida dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

Same case below, 29 So. 3d 291.
# DLA Distribution Anniston commander highlights person of excellence – Jim Walker

/ Published Oct. 23, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
In a recent newsletter shared with employees, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Anniston, Alabama, Commander Army Lt. Col. Ayo Oladipofaniyi stated “at DDAA we must confront our challenges (morale and culture). We are very good at what we do, but we need to get better and create an environment to become excellent in what we do.”

According to Oladipofaniyi, they already have the required prerequisites to be excellent within the DDAA formation. He shared a story of one in their ranks who exemplified that characteristic.

“A few weeks back, we had a commercial trucking company schedule a late afternoon pickup. Immediately upon arrival at our location, the truck broke down on Second Avenue West. The truck driver’s knowledge of his equipment was purely limited to operating the truck. For a good hour, while the truck was partially blocking Second Avenue, the truck driver was in the truck’s cab trying to reach the company for assistance. While the rest of us, myself included, stood around wondering, ‘What the heck?’ Mr. Jimmie Walker, one of our truck drivers, stepped in. Within minutes, Mr. Walker was taking charge of the situation.”

That day, Walker was over at the outlying warehouses picking up shipping and saw a driver was having trouble with his disabled truck. He saw a bunch of people standing around and stopped to help, and that was when Walker discovered the truck’s brakes were locked up due to a faulty air compressor. After assessing the situation, Walker gave guidance to the truck driver on what to do and what sort of roadside assistance to request.

The driver was on his way later that evening.

Walker said he is one of those people who is constantly working, and if he can help in a situation, he’ll give it a try. That day – he tried.

“Sometimes you can’t (fix a problem), but you’ll never know unless you give it shot,” said Walker.Oladipofaniyi said what he witnessed that day was a DDAA employee at his best – being excellent. “Our goal is not having a few Mr. Jimmie Walkers, but for all of us to become a Jimmie Walker in our daily duties – a ‘Band of Excellence.’”
# Battle Creek team helps equip Central operations

/ Published Feb. 15, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Michigan, 
Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services employees at global sites often count on colleagues in Battle Creek, Michigan, to ensure essential equipment they need like the team who helps keep the specialized equipment site staffs rely on getting to where it is needed.

Jenny Norvey, Development Branch chief, said her colleagues Don Zimmerman and Chris Milazzo, from the Workforce Development Branch, partner with Teresa Cowell from the Operations Directorate to make these shipments happen. Their efforts are aided by members of the Ocean Containers transportation team at DLA Operations in Fort Belvoir, Virginia.

“We take a collaborative approach to facilitating the shipment of necessary equipment supporting the Central region’s needs,” Cowell said.

To support any equipment purchases for Central, Cowell said vendors ship equipment to the Battle Creek Michigan Air National Guard Base. The base hosts a storage site for DLA Disposition Services’ Expeditionary Site Sets, which is located near its Training Operations and Simulation Center. The facilities there offer a good staging area and the equipment necessary to handle heavy equipment during shipping.

“We begin coordination via our transportation,” Cowell explained. “Working with outbound transportation companies, base security, and equipment operators, we prepare and load the outbound equipment in a safe manner.

Cowell said challenges from current health and safety guidance and the inability to provide radio-frequency identification trackers and seals led her to devise additional manual tracking requirements through the shipment and receipt process.

Having deployed multiple times for DLA Disposition Services, Cowell said she understands the importance and benefit of having safe, working equipment and how it enables DLA to support the warfighter. 

“I am more than happy to my part to ensure my teammates in deployed locations have that equipment,” Cowell said.

Zimmerman helps train personnel at the TOSC for field assignments so they will receive and handle property safely, especially when employees are using material handling equipment like forklifts and container handlers. He uses that experience to help the team safely move items headed for Central.

“In the risk assessment for property moving Jan. 27, we agreed that both the load out and the offload were non-standard loads, so I was there as a secondary spotter,” Zimmerman said.

Spotters help operators using MHE to avoid colliding with objects they cannot see because their view is blocked by the item being moved.

“I am glad to help out Central or any region, especially when it comes to the safety to our people and property,” Zimmerman said.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.77

                Call Option Agreement-Participation Letter of Shanghai On-Target

                   ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER FOR PARTICIPATION OF
                              CALL OPTION AGREEMENT

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD., (registered address: Room 1003 F,
No.1027, Changning Road, Changning District, Shanghai) and JIMMY WEI YU
(Identity Card Number: 310106731015081) (hereinafter the "PARTICIPATING
SHAREHOLDER"), and SHANGHAI ON-TARGET ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD. (registered
address: Room 1003H, No. 1027 Changning Road, Changning District, Shanghai)
(hereinafter the "NEW TARGET COMPANY"), as independent party, hereby agree to
participate in the Shareholders' Voting Rights Call Option Agreement among Focus
Media Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY"),
Shanghai Focus Media Advertisement Co., Ltd. and other relevant parties
(hereinafter the "CALL OPTION AGREEMENT") dated March 28 2005. Participating
Shareholder hereby grant Focus Media Technology with an irrevocable equity Call
Option (hereinafter "CALL OPTION") in respect to 60% and 40% of the equity share
of New Target Company (hereinafter "NEWLY INCREASED EQUITY SHARE") respectively
held by Participating Shareholder. Once this Acknowledgement Letter is executed
by Participating Shareholder and New Target Company, New Target Company and the
Newly Increased Equity Share shall be deemed to be the "Target Company" and
"Option Equity" defined under the Call Option Agreement, and Participating
Shareholder and New Target Company shall be deemed to have made the same
undertakings and warranties related to New Target Company and Option Equity with
those of the Shareholders and Target Companies under the Call Option Agreement
have made related to "Target Company" and "Option Equity" (to the extent that is
related and applicable to Participating Shareholder and Participated Target
Company), and acknowledged and agreed to respectively perform the same
obligations in the Call Option Agreement (to the extent that is related and
applicable to Participating Shareholder and Participated Target Company).

<PAGE>

                Call Option Agreement-Participation Letter of Shanghai On-Target

                                [EXECUTION PAGE]

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERISEMENT CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by:    /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              -----------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006

JIMMY WEI YU

Signature by:    /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              -----------------------------
Date: May 22, 2006

SHANGHAI ON-TARGET ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by:    /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              -----------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006

FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by:    /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              -----------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CHRISTOPHER JOHN RUDY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Director, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, DEPUTY 

UNDERSECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND BARACK 

OBAMA, in capacity as President of the United 

States or under color of the Office of President and 

individually,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________ 

2014-1056

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:13-cv-00278-LMBTCB, Judge Leonie M. Brinkema.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

CHRISTOPHER JOHN RUDY, of Port Huron, Michigan, 

pro se. 
 

KIMERE J. KIMBALL, Special Assistant, United States 

Attorney, of Alexandria, Virginia, for defendantsappellees. With her on the brief were DANA J. BOENTE, 

Acting United States Attorney, and BENJAMIN T.

HICKMAN, Special Assistant, United States Attorney. Of 

counsel on the brief were MONICA B. LATEEF and COKE 

MORGAN STEWART, Associate Solicitors. Of counsel was 

NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor,

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and DYK, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 11, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register: January 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 7)]
[Notices]               
[Page 1681]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12ja10-101]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6824]

 
Advisory Committee International Postal and Delivery Services

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice; FACA Committee meeting announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 
92-463, the Department of State gives notice of the sixth meeting of 
the Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services. 
This Committee has been formed in fulfillment of the provisions of the 
2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 109-435) and in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Public input: Any member of the public interested in providing 
public input to the meeting should contact Mr. Chris Wood, whose 
contact information is listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section of this notice. Each individual providing oral input is 
requested to limit his or her comments to five minutes. Requests to be 
added to the speaker list must be received in writing (letter, e-mail, 
or fax) prior to the close of business on February 4, 2010; written 
comments from members of the public for distribution at this meeting 
must reach Mr. Wood by letter, e-mail, or fax by this same date.
    Meeting agenda: The agenda of the meeting will include a review of 
the results of the October-November 2009 session of the UPU Council of 
Administration and other subjects related to international postal and 
delivery services of interest to Advisory Committee members and the 
public.
    Date: February 11, 2010 from 2 p.m. to about 5 p.m. (open to the 
public).
    Location: The American Institute of Architects (Boardroom), 1735 
New York Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20006.
    For further information, please contact Christopher Wood, Office of 
Technical Specialized Agencies (IO/GS), Bureau of International 
Organization Affairs, U.S. Department of State, at (202) 647-1044, 
woodcs@state.gov.

    Dated: December 22, 2009.
Dennis M. Delehanty,
Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee on International Postal 
and Delivery Services.
Dennis M. Delehanty,
Foreign Affairs Officer, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-361 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 39729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15850]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS13-16]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: OCC--400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024.
    Date: July 10, 2013.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open
    Matters to be Considered:
    Summary Agenda: June 12, 2013 minutes--Open Session.
    (No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)
    Discussion Agenda:
    Idaho Compliance Review.
    Utah Compliance Review.
    Kentucky and Virginia Compliance Review Acknowledgment.
    Update on the Implementation of the Policy Statements.
    How to Attend and Observe an ASC meeting: Email your name, 
organization and contact information to meetings@asc.gov. You may also 
send a written request via U.S. Mail, fax or commercial carrier to the 
Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H Street NW., Ste 760, Washington, 
DC 20005. The fax number is 202-289-4101. Your request must be received 
no later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the Monday prior to the meeting. 
Attendees must have a valid government-issued photo ID and must agree 
to submit to reasonable security measures. The meeting space is 
intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will 
not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that 
reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, 
photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device 
designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: June 27, 2013.
James R. Park,
 Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-15850 Filed 7-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
#### In the Matter of Julio A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 517]

*408Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about April 4, 2016, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree (two counts), grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, assault in the third degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 15 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about February 4, 2016, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition.

Appellant’s legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations regarding identification and credibility.

To the extent that appellant argues that a showup identification should have been suppressed as unduly suggestive and that it tainted the victim’s in-court identification of him, he never moved to suppress that evidence, and he thus failed to present a sufficient factual record for review *(see*Family Ct Act § 330.2). To the extent that appellant argues that the showup rendered the identification evidence unreliable, that claim is unavailing, because the evidence at the fact-finding hearing established that there was a reliable identification, in very close temporal and geographic proximity to the crime *(see generally People v Howard,*22 NY3d 388, 402-403 [2013]).

Concur—Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 9, 2022

No. 04-22-00537-CR

EX PARTE Erick Vioney Arana ARRIOLA

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10460CR

Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 2, 2022, the State filed an unopposed motion to consolidate, seeking 

consolidation of this case with seventeen others and for an extension of time to file its brief. We 

DENY the motion as to consolidation, but we GRANT the motion as to the extension of time and 

ORDER the State to file its brief by January 6, 2023. The State may file the same brief in 

multiple cases, if it so desires, by placing all appellate cause numbers in the style and by filing 

the brief separately in all cause numbers. Further requests for extensions of time will be 

disfavored.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
#### Com. v. Williams

08/30/2016

173 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 207
No. 09-1570.

#### Jorge Filadelfo Robleto-Pastora, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 841, 131 S. Ct. 215,

178 L. Ed. 2d 47,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5775.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 591 F.3d 1051.
#### People ex rel. Haddock v Dolce

4th Dept: 149 AD3d 1593

denied*
EXHIBIT 10.22

                       ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE

                THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE (this "AGREEMENT") is
made as of [    ] 2006, by and between GLOBAL CREDIT ANALYTICS, INC., a Delaware
corporation ("ASSIGNOR") and XL CAPITAL ASSURANCE INC., a New York stock
insurance corporation ("ASSIGNEE").

                For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and
other good and valuable consideration paid by Assignee to Assignor, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby assigns,
transfers, sets over and conveys to Assignee, all of Assignor's right, title and
interest in and to that certain (i) Lease dated August 5, 1999 between 250 Park
Avenue LLC, as landlord, and Assignor, as tenant (the "LEASE") and (ii)
Agreement of Sublease dated April 7, 2003 between Assignor, as sublessor, and
Miller Buckfire Lewis & Co., LLC, as sublessee (the "SUBLEASE"). Assignee hereby
accepts the assignment and agrees to assume, fulfill, perform and discharge all
the various commitments, obligations and liabilities of Assignor, as tenant
under the Lease, and as sublandlord under the Sublease, in accordance with the
terms of the Lease and the Sublease, as the case may be.

                This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon
the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This Agreement
shall be governed by, and construed under, the laws of the State of New York.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee do hereby execute and
deliver this Agreement as of the date and year first above written.

                                        ASSIGNOR:
                                        ---------

                                        GLOBAL CREDIT ANALYTICS, INC., a
                                        Delaware corporation
                                        By:
                                           -----------------------------
                                             Name:
                                             Title:

                                        ASSIGNEE:
                                        ---------

                                        XL CAPITAL ASSURANCE INC.
                                        a New York stock insurance corporation
                                        By:
                                           -----------------------------
                                             Name:
                                             Title: