alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Disaster preparedness, one step at a time

/ Published Sept. 16, 2020
Richmond, Va., 
Virginia has seen its share of disaster events this year. From heavy snow to damaging winds, to flooding and tornadoes, residents continue to prove their resilience in the face of adverse events.

That resilience can be made even stronger with a healthy dose of disaster preparedness. Getting ready for potential disasters, particularly adverse weather events and their side effects, is easier than one might think.

Disaster preparedness experts recommend starting with a rich resource of information. The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s website, Ready.gov, has a wealth of information and guidance on becoming equipped to manage your affairs and minimize property damage in the event of a natural disaster.

Ready.gov advises breaking up preparedness plans into small, manageable steps, including:
      - Staying informed.  Many platforms provide up-to-date hazard information. Tune in to television and radio broadcasts, download smart phone applications and, if at work, listen for messages from the Giant Voice Mass Notification System, AtHoc (DLA’s Emergency Mass Notification System) and verbal instructions from local emergency officials.
      - Making a plan.  Your plan does not have to be complex. Your plan should cover communications, evacuations routes, rally points, job assignments, pets and shelter locations. Consider using one of the planning templates available on Ready.gov.
      - Creating an emergency kit.  Obtain items that will sustain you and your family for the first 72 hours of an event. Kits should include food and water, medication for family members and family pets, a first aid kit, clothing, blankets, flashlights, a radio and/or a weather radio, masks and hand sanitizer.
      - Practicing your plans and updating them as needed.  Rehearse what you’ll do in case of an emergency, whether at home or at the office. Identify any shortcomings or missed opportunities and update your plan accordingly.

For questions about emergency preparedness on the installation, contact Russell Pitts at Russell.Pitts@dla.mil.
# DLA Installation Management Susquehanna’s Prepareathon topic #4: Plan, Prepare, Update

/ Published April 26, 2021
 NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Susquehanna Security & Emergency Services team initiated a preparedness program for the month of April. Deemed “April Prepareathon,” the Emergency Management team will provide a new topic each week this month to assist employees with preparing for disasters and other emergencies.

This week’s topic covers planning and preparing a communication plan and keeping your emergency use information up to date.

“Prepareathon was developed to motivate everyone to act and to prepare for disasters that may affect their communities,” Installation Emergency Manager Rick Zucchero said, in an all-hands email message sent out to installation employees.

What if your cellphone dies and the power is out? Are you able to communicate with your supervisor at work during an emergency? How about with your family and friends when you are at home? Do you have their phone numbers? Part of being prepared for disasters is having a communications plan. 

Creating a plan is simple. Zucchero shared the following information on creating communication plans:
      - Collect. Create a paper copy of the contact information of your family and other important people/offices such as medical facilities doctors, schools or service providers.
      - Share. Make sure everyone carries a copy of the plan. You should also post a copy in a central location in your home, such as your refrigerator or family bulletin board.
      - Practice. Have a regular household meeting to review and practice your plan.
      - Text is best! If you are using a mobile phone, a text message may get through when a phone call will not. This is because a text message requires far less bandwidth than a phone call. Text messages may also save and then send automatically as soon as capacity becomes available.

Additionally, ensure your AtHoc information is up to date. AtHoc is DLA’s Emergency Mass Notification System and requires a common access card to access the system.With the AtHoc notifications system, employees will receive emails, text messages and phone calls at work during emergencies, or when the installation has a closure or delayed opening. Employees may also use the option of getting alert messages on home phones, cell phones or via personal email.

More information about emergency communication plans can be found at www.ready.gov.

While this is the last week of April’s Prepareathon topics, Zucchero said that doesn’t mean we should put off getting ready for disasters or emergencies until next year, and he encourages all to continue to plan and prepare. He summarized April’s Prepareathon quoting French biologist Louis Pasteur, “’Chance favors the prepared mind.’ Meaning, if you prepare for a disaster then you will be much better off if a disaster happens!”
#### Amanda Stowe, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Legend Stowe and Another, Infants, Respondent, v Karen Furness, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 798]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Matthew J. Murphy, III, A.J.), entered January 28, 2016. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this negligence action on behalf of her infant children against defendant, her former landlord, to recover damages for injuries that the children allegedly sustained as a result of lead paint exposure. We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. As the court properly determined, there is an issue of fact whether defendant had actual or constructive notice of the hazardous condition *(see generally Chapman v Silber,*97 NY2d 9, 21-22 [2001]). Defendant stated in an affidavit that she renovated and repainted the apartment in 2009, learned of the lead paint condition for the first time in 2014, and immediately asked plaintiff’s family to move out so that she could remediate the property. In opposition, plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a prior tenant, who stated that the Orleans County Department of Health detected dangerously high lead levels in chipped paint at the apartment in 2006, and that she told defendant about those results at that time. We conclude that the affidavit of the prior tenant, in combination with the deposition testimony of plaintiff’s husband that he informed defendant sometime after 2009 of chipping paint in the apartment, creates an issue of fact sufficient to preclude summary judgment. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the out-of-court statements contained in the prior tenant’s affidavit are not hearsay because they were not offered for the truth of the matters asserted, i.e., the presence of flaking and chipping lead paint in the apartment *(see generally Nucci v Proper,*95 NY2d 597, 602 [2001]), but instead were offered to establish that defendant had notice thereof.

We reject defendant’s further contention that she is entitled *1655to summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs conduct was a superseding cause of the children’s injuries. Although a defendant in such a case may assert a defense that the plaintiff created or exacerbated the lead paint condition *(see M.F. v Delaney,*37 AD3d 1103, 1105 [2007]), the fact that plaintiff and her children failed to vacate the premises for two months after discovering the lead paint condition does not establish such a defense as a matter of law.

Present—Smith, J.P., Carni, DeJoseph, NeMoyer and Troutman, JJ.
#### Scott Q. v Joy R.

3d Dept: 151 AD3d 1206

denied
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03989**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  03989\03989_ Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03989\03989_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 03989\03989_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 03989\03989_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 03989\03989_PART A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03989\03989_PART B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03989\03989_PART C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03989\03989_PART D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03989\03989_PART H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03989\Supporting documents\03989_ A2-3 Att 1 Sherburne County Gen[1]. Plant_Units 3 - 4_Environmental Report_Volume I_NSPC Feb. 1976.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03989\Supporting documents\03989_ A2-3 Att 3 Sherburne County Gen Plant Unit 3 Supp Env Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03989\Supporting documents\03989_A2-3 Att 2 Sherburne County Gen[1]. Plant_Units 3 - 4_Environmental Report_Volume II_NSPC Feb 1976.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03989\Supporting documents\03989_Part A Question A10-5_ADA Final.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03989\Supporting documents\03989_Part A Question A5-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03989\Supporting documents\03989_Part A Question A5-3 Water Balance Diagram.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03989\Supporting documents\03989_Part D - Block Diagrams D-1 RB.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03989\Supporting documents\03989_Part D - Block Diagrams D-2 BAP.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03989\Supporting documents\03989_Part D - Block Diagrams D-3 P2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03989\Supporting documents\03989_Part D - Block Diagrams D-4 P3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03989\Supporting documents\03989_Part D - Block Diagrams D-5 SedB.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03989\Supporting documents\03989_Part D - Block Diagrams D-6 RetB.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03989\Supporting documents\03989_Part D - Block Diagrams D-7 P1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03989\Supporting documents\03989_Part D - Block Diagrams D-8 Thickener.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
161 A.3d 759

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-MOVANT, v. SHAYNA ZALCBERG, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

March 9, 2017

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the appellant may serve and file a supplemental brief on or before May 8, 2017, and respondent may serve and file a supplemental brief forty-five days after the filing of appellant’s supplemental submission, or, if appellant declines to file such a submission, on or before June 22, 2017.
|                                                                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                           
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Dominican Republic (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                                           
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Dominican Republic (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 33.52  | 20.24  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1927

To increase the rates of compensation for veterans with service-connected

disabilities and the rates of dependency and indemnity compensation

for the survivors of certain disabled veterans.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 11 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. DECONCINI, Mr.

MITCHELL, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. CAMPBELL,

Mr. THURMOND, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. SPECTER, and Mr. JEFFORDS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To increase the rates of compensation for veterans with

service-connected disabilities and the rates of dependency

and indemnity compensation for the survivors of certain

disabled veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Compensa5 tion Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 1994’’.
2

•S 1927 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISABILITY COMPENSATION AND DEPENDENCY

2 AND INDEMNITY COMPENSATION RATE IN3 CREASES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) The Secretary of Veterans Af5 fairs shall, as provided in paragraph (2), increase, effec6 tive December 1, 1994, the rates of and limitations on

7 Department of Veterans Affairs disability compensation

8 and dependency and indemnity compensation.

9 (2)(A) The Secretary shall increase each of the rates

10 and limitations provided for in sections 1114, 1115(1),

11 1162, 1311, 1313, and 1314 of title 38, United States

12 Code. The increase shall be by the same percentage that

13 benefit amounts payable under title II of the Social Secu14 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) are increased effective

15 December 1, 1994, as a result of a determination under

16 section 215(i) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 415(i)).

17 (B) In the computation of increased rates and limita18 tions pursuant to subparagraph (A), amounts of $0.50 or

19 more shall be rounded to the next higher dollar amount

20 and amounts of less than $0.50 shall be rounded to the

21 next lower dollar amount.

22 (b) SPECIAL RULE.—The Secretary may adjust ad23 ministratively, consistent with the increases made under

24 subsection (a), the rates of disability compensation pay25 able to persons within the purview of section 10 of Public

26 Law 85–857 (2 Stat. 1263) who are not in receipt of com-
3

•S 1927 IS

1 pensation payable pursuant to chapter 11 of title 38,

2 United States Code.

3 (c) PUBLICATION REQUIREMENT.—At the same time

4 as the matters specified in section 214(i)(2)(D) of the So5 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 415(i)(2)(D)) are required

6 to be published by reason of a determination made under

7 section 215(i) of such Act during fiscal year 1994, the

8 Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register the rates

9 and limitations referred to in subsection (a)(2)(A) as in10 creased under this section.

Æ
No. 09-10901.

#### Dave Dale Baker, Petitioner v. Wyoming.

562 U.S. 855, 131 S. Ct. 118,

178 L. Ed. 2d 73,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5938.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wyoming denied.

Same case below, 223 P.3d 542.
No. 09-400.

#### Vincent E. Staub, Petitioner v. Proctor Hospital.

562 U.S. 821, 131 S. Ct. 379,

178 L. Ed. 2d 14,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6386.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted. Motion of *15Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae out of time granted.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
No. 10M15.

#### Marilyn McCoy Norwood, Petitioner v. Arkansas State Hospital.

562 U.S. 819, 131 S. Ct. 375,

178 L. Ed. 2d 11,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6367.

October 4, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
No. 09-10740.

#### Rickey Sabedra, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 803, 131 S. Ct. 105,

178 L. Ed. 2d 4,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7803.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
No. 09-11398.

#### Erick Turcios-Lazo, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 878, 131 S. Ct. 191,

178 L. Ed. 2d 115,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6980.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 378 Fed. Appx. 341.
No. 09-10556.

#### Mariano H. Ospina, Petitioner v. IndyMac Bank, et al.

562 U.S. 846, 131 S. Ct. 89,

178 L. Ed. 2d 56,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5796.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 334 Fed. Appx. 567.
Exhibit 10.3

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Elbit Systems
Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-9354 and 333-139512) pertaining to the employees stock
option plan of our report dated March 12, 2007, with respect to the financial statements
of Tadiran Electronic Systems Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co. Brightman Almagor & Co. 
Certified Public AccountantsA member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

June 13, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  February 25, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Mark King,  CEO of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



 /s/ Mark King
-------------------------
Mark King, CEO
(Chief Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
 
 Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Thomas Granville, Principal Executive Officer of Axion Power International, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:
 
 The Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Thomas GranvilleThomas Granville, Principal Executive OfficerDated: March 30, 2011
No. 09-1439.

#### Candelario Holguin, Jr., Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 834, 131 S. Ct. 131,

178 L. Ed. 2d 34,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6544.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### Ray v. Civil Service Com’n of Borough of Darby

08/25/2016

222-223 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 131 A.3d 1012
# IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0635 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SAUL JAMES DOOLING,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 18, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2023

07/12/2023
Case Number: DA 22-0635 

# FILED Bowen Greenwood CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2023

07/12/2023
Case Number: DA 22-0635