alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2011241EN.01003001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/30 |

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION 2011/543/CFSP

of 15 September 2011

implementing Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP of 28 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya [(1)](#ntr1-L_2011241EN.01003001-E0001), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

In view of the developments in Libya, the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP should be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The entry for the entity set out in the Annex to this Decision shall be deleted from the list set out in Annex IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 15 September 2011.

For the Council

The President

M. DOWGIELEWICZ

---

[(1)](#ntc1-L_2011241EN.01003001-E0001)  
[OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 53](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2011_058_R_TOC).

---

ANNEX

ENTITY REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 42. | Afriqiyah Airways |

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mario Olmedo, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 284]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered May 17, 2011, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

While the question of whether a defendant was prejudiced by the lack of advice from the court about the deportation consequences of a guilty plea is generally to be determined by way of a hearing (see *People v Peque,*22 NY3d 168, 200 [2013], *cert denied*574 US —, 135 S Ct 90 [2014]), under the circumstances of this case, viewed as a whole, we find no reasonable possibility that defendant could make the requisite showing of prejudice at a hearing.

Concur — Acosta, J.P, Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
* * In light of the facts presented by the carrier , including its assertion that it is nearing completion in

obtaining Brazilian Government approval, w e will grant the carrier’s request fo r extension of the start

up date for an additional 90 days . We will require the carrier to institute service no later than

November 9, 2011.

We acted on this motion without awaiting expiration of the answer period with the consent of all parties

served with the request.
# Senior enlisted leader honored by Defense Logistics Agency

/ Published Jan. 12, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
A Defense Logistics Agency award has gone out to Air Force Senior Master Sgt. Samson McLester, a senior enlisted leader, for his service in 2020.

DLA Disposition Services Director Mike Cannon congratulated McLester, the superintendent for DLA Disposition Services in Qatar and Senior Enlisted Leader for the Central region, on his selection as DLA’s Logistics Readiness Senior Non-Commissioned Officer of the Year.

“He now goes on to compete against the best of his peers across the Air Force for the service-level award,” Cannon said.

Samson said he is honored to receive the award and expressed gratitude to his senior leaders like Army Col. Daniel Horn, deputy commander for DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM Forward, for providing mentorship. He also gave a special thanks to the Airmen he led at his previous duty station at Travis Air Force Base and the Sailors and Soldiers he has led since his assignment to Central four months ago.

“I truly owe all my success this past year to my team. Great things in any organization are never done by one person. They’re done by a team of people,” McLester said.  

Calling 2020 a “challenging year,” McLester sees the lessons learned and the adversity as opportunities to grow as a leader. He said his assignment to DLA gave him a unique opportunity to lead in a joint command.

“In the short period of time I’ve been assigned to DLA, it truly has expanded my perspective on my role in supporting the warfighter and I’m excited to take the knowledge and breadth of experience I’ve obtained back to the Air Force next year,” McLester said.
161 A.3d 764

#### IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRANT R.S. APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ORDER DENYING MOTION TO TERMINATE MEGAN’S LAW REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS (R.S.—PETITIONER)

March 9, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.
<PAGE>





                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints each of Christie S. Flanagan, Renee Nichols Tucei, and Eric K.
Kawamura or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution for him and in his name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the CALIFORNIA FEDERAL
PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION (the "Corporation"), Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign
the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the
undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to
the Form 10- K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in
connection with the Form 10- K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including
this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Office
of Thrift Supervision, or other appropriate regulatory authority and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 11 day
of March 1999.



                                                    /s/ Robert Nichols
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Robert Nichols
II

Calendar No. 586

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2199

[Report No. 103–344]

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel EMERALD AYES.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 16 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

AUGUST 19 (legislative day, AUGUST 18), 1994

Reported by Mr. HOLLINGS, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

EMERALD AYES.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation
2

S 2199 RS

1 for the vessel EMERALD AYES, United States official

2 number 986099.

Calendar No. 586

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2199

[Report No. 103–344]

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the

vessel EMERALD AYES.

AUGUST 19 (legislative day, AUGUST 18), 1994

Reported without amendment
#### Com. v. Hunter

12/01/2015

598 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 449
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

COCKRELL INVESTMENT

PARTNERS, L.P.,

Appellant,

v.

MIDDLE PECOS GROUNDWATER

CONSERVATION DISTRICT, TY

EDWARDS, in his Official Capacity as

General Manager of the MIDDLE PECOS

GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION

DISTRICT , and FORT STOCKTON

HOLDINGS, L.P.

,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 21

- 00200

- CV

Appeal from the

83rd District Court

of Pecos County, Texas

(TC# P

- 8277

- 83

- CV)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee s

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43 .5, for performance of the

judgment and all costs, both in this Court and the court below, for which let execution issue. This

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8 TH DAY OF MARCH , 20 23

.

G INA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez

, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
160 A.3d 696

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-CROSS-PETITIONER, v. JAMES ZARATE (A/K/A NAVAJAS ZARATE), DEFENDANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT.

February 13, 2017

ON CROSS PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A cross-petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the cross-petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, for resentencing in light of this Court’s holding in *State v. Zuber,*227 *N.J.*422, 152 A.3d 197 (2017). Jurisdiction is not retained.
No. 09-10823.

#### Robert Arrington, Petitioner v. Georgia.

562 U.S. 853, 131 S. Ct. 112,

178 L. Ed. 2d 69,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6037.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.

Same case below, 286 Ga. 335, 687 S.E.2d 438.
No. 12-6517.

#### Hugueley *v.*Tennessee.

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
#### Thompson, Matter of, v Vance

1st Dept: 149 AD3d 406

denied
# DLA Troop Support celebrates retiring civilians

/ Published Aug. 3, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
With masks donned and social distance guidelines in place, the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support came together in person and via phone to celebrate the careers of nine retiring employees during a ceremony July 30.

Army Brig. Gen. Gavin Lawrence, DLA Troop Support commander, thanked the new retirees for their combined 324 years of service to their country during the ceremony – the first held since February.

“Your years of service have made you a part of the rich history and exceptional reputation of DLA Troop Support and its legacy organizations,” Lawrence said. “You have all experienced numerous changes over the course of your careers, but you’ve remained constant and unwavering in your dedication to our mission. For that, I thank you.”

He also thanked the retirees’ families for providing support and encouragement throughout their careers.

“To all our retirees’ family members: you have my personal thanks, on behalf of Troop Support and especially those serving in uniform, for your unwavering support throughout the years,” he said.

Lawrence presented each employee with a certificate of retirement, a DLA Troop Support memento, and a commander’s coin. In addition, spouses received certificates of appreciation.

The retirees were:
      - Sheryl Gantt, 45 years of service, Construction and Equipment
      - Donna Humphrey-Graham, 37 years of service, Construction and Equipment
      - Robert Pezick Jr., 37 years of service, Construction and Equipment
      - Andrea Woodring, 36 years of service, Business Process Support
      - Cassandra Benson-Sistrun, 35 years of service, Construction and Equipment
      - Gwendolyn Hall Williams, 35 years of service, Construction and Equipment
      - Maritza Guevara, 35 years of service, Business Process Support
      - Donna Raday, 34 years of service, Medical
      - Michael Cianfrani, 30 years of service, Subsistence
# DLA Energy hosts Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month event 

/ Published April 29, 2019
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
DLA Energy welcomes guest speaker Air Force Sexual Assault Response Coordinator Heather Turner, May 1 from 11 a.m. to noon in the Kunkel Conference Room, Suite 4950. Turner will address the neurobiology of trauma; its impact, the relationship between trauma and memory and how trauma affects the brain and behavior.

Turner serves as program director for the Bolling Air Force Base/Pentagon Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program. She is an advocate for survivors of sexual assault and manages over 40 volunteer victim advocates in the National Capital Region. Turner conducts annual training for more than 200,000 Air Force active duty and civilian personnel.For more information and to register, please contact Stephanie VanRiper, Stephanie.vanriper@dla.mil.
#### Com. v. Trice 46

03/22/2016

467 WAL (2015)

46

. Justice DONOHUE and WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 478
#### Dolores S. Suarez, Respondent, v Shapiro Family Realty Associates, LLC, et al., Appellants, and Duane Reade, Inc., Respondent. Shapiro Family Realty Associates, LLC, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v Sato Construction Co., Inc., Doing Business as Flag Waterproofing & Restoration Company, et al., Third-Party Defendants.

[53 NYS3d 23]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered September 30, 2016, which denied the motion of defendants Shapiro Family Realty Associates, LLC, Kern 90, LLC and Rose Associates, Inc. to strike plaintiff’s note of issue, to compel defendant Duane Reade, Inc. to comply with discovery, and to compel third-party defendants, Sato Construction Co., Inc. and Production Contracting Co., to produce witnesses for depositions, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and Shapiro’s motion granted to the extent that Duane Reade is directed to provide a copy of contracts relative *527to sidewalk repairs performed on the sidewalk abutting its leased premises forthwith, to produce John Yodice and Tim Weiss for depositions within 60 days of the date of this order, and to provide the last known address of Mark Bander, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Under the circumstances, where plaintiff’s certificate of readiness contained no incorrect material representations, the court properly refused to vacate the note of issue (cf. 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]). However, as plaintiff acknowledged in the note of issue and certificate of readiness, discovery was still outstanding. Plaintiff’s argument that Shapiro’s affirmation of good faith failed to comply with 22 NYCRR 202.7 is unavailing, since the record demonstrates that Shapiro repeatedly attempted to obtain discovery and depositions from Duane Reade, but to no avail. “Under the unique circumstances of this case,” any further attempt to resolve the dispute non-judicially would have been futile *(see Carrasquillo v Netsloh Realty Corp.,*279 AD2d 334, 334 [1st Dept 2001]).

It is noted that granting Shapiro’s discovery request as to Duane Reade will not prejudice plaintiff, since the matter remains on the trial calendar *(see May v American Red Cross,*282 AD2d 285 [1st Dept 2001]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
# Daylight saving time: Fall back this Sunday

/ Published Oct. 31, 2019
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
Daylight saving time ends this Sunday at 2 a.m. when most Americans rewind their clocks. 

Daylight saving time begins the second Sunday in March and ends the first Sunday in November, when clocks are adjusted one hour back to standard time.

The United States adopted daylight saving time when the Uniform Time Act of 1966 standardized time zones and daylight saving practices across the United States.

The act allowed states to pass laws exempting themselves. The only states that don’t observe daylight saving time are Hawaii and most of Arizona. It’s also not observed by these U.S. territories: American Somoa, Guam, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.
#### In the Matter of Suffolk County Department of Social Services, on Behalf of Annette Calliendo, Respondent, v Cody S. Block, Appellant.

[58 NYS3d 129]—

Appeal by the father from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Matthew Hughes, J.), dated October 4, 2016. The order denied the father’s objections to an order of that court (Aletha Fields, S.M.) dated July 26, 2016, which, after a hearing, granted the Suffolk County Department of Social Services’ *530petition for child support and directed him to pay weekly child support in the sum of $113.

Ordered that the order dated October 4, 2016, is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court did not err in denying the father’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s order granting the petition for child support and directing him to pay weekly child support in the sum of $113 *(see*Family Ct Act § 424-a [b]). Where a respondent in a child support proceeding fails, without good cause, to comply with the compulsory financial disclosure mandated by Family Court Act § 424-a, “the court on its own motion or on application shall grant the relief demanded in the petition or shall order that, for purposes of the support proceeding, the respondent shall be precluded from offering evidence as to respondent’s financial ability to pay support” (Family Ct Act § 424-a [b]; *see Matter of Speranza v Speranza,*113 AD3d 622, 623 [2014]; *Matter of Sheenagh O’R. v Sean F.,*50 AD3d 480, 481-482 [2008]). While the father submitted a sworn financial affidavit, he failed to accompany the affidavit with any of the documentation required by Family Court Act § 424-a. Since the father failed, without good cause, to comply with the compulsory financial disclosure mandated by Family Court Act § 424-a, the Family Court did not err in precluding him from offering evidence as to his financial ability to pay *(see*Family Ct Act § 424-a [b]; *Matter of Speranza v Speranza,*113 AD3d at 622), and providently exercised its discretion in determining the amount of support based on the needs of the child, which were established by the petitioner as the customary grant for one child on public assistance *(see*Family Ct Act § 424-a [b]; *Matter of Toumazatos v Toumazatos,*125 AD3d 870, 871 [2015]; *Matter of Hicks v Hicks,*87 AD3d 1143 [2011]).

The father’s remaining contentions, which were not raised in his objections to the Support Magistrate’s order, are not properly before this Court *(see Hicks v Hicks,*87 AD3d at 1143-1144).

Balkin, J.P., Chambers, Barros and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
#### Com. v. Gallagher

12/10/2015

571 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 104
2017-0367.

#### State ex rel. Matthews v. Haviland.

Allen App. No. 1-16-54. On appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction. This cause originated in the court of appeals and, therefore, should proceed as an appeal of right pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 5.01.

The clerk shall issue an order for the transmission of the record from the Court of Appeals for *1432Allen County, and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prae.R. 16.02 through 16.07.
#### In the Matter of Daniel N. Clark, Respondent, v Corey Ortega et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent.

[57 NYS3d 890]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered on or about August 11, 2017 unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petition as supplemented by the schedule, filed and served on respondent on the return date of the order to show cause, gave detailed and timely notice of the specific signatures that petitioner was claiming had been erroneously invalidated by the Board of Elections (Election Law § 16-102).

Concur— Gische, J.R, Richter, Kapnick, Webber and Kahn, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Demorest, Chief Executive Officer ofMOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best ofmy knowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of MOCON, Inc.

 

 

Date:  November 14, 2007

 

 
| /s/ Robert L. Demorest  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Robert L. Demorest      |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

----
-79.5 -79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0
37.5 38.0 38.5 39.0 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/09 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
Order filed September 11, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00308

- CV

____________ HELEN MAYFIELD , Appellant

V. HARRIS COUNTY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No . 2011

- 26254



### O R D E R
Appellant ’ s brief was due July 9, 2012

. No brief or motion for extension of time
has been filed.
Unless appellant files h er brief with the clerk of this court on or before September 24, 2012 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
Exhibit
32.1

MTS
SYSTEMS CORPORATION 
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The
undersigned, Laura B. Hamilton, the Chief Executive Officer of MTS Systems
Corporation (the Company), has executed this Certification in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2009 (the
Report).

The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: May 4,
2009

| |                                    | 
| | ---------------------------------- | 
| | /s/
 LAURA B. HAMILTON             | 
| | Laura
 B. Hamilton                 | 
| | Chair
 and Chief Executive Officer | 

---
164 A.3d 393

#### FREDERICK J. NAHAS, M.D., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. SHORE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ALBERT GUTIERREZ, DR. STEPHEN GOSIN, DR. JEFFREY GOSIN, DR. LEONARD GALLER, DR. JAMES JUNGBLUT, AND RICHARD MENGHETTI, DEFENDANTS.

March 16, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.