alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated September 16, 2004 accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements of  Bioenvision,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  appearing in the
Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  for the  year  ended  June  30,  2004  which is
incorporated by reference in this Registration  Statement.  We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration  Statement of
Bioenvision,  Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 333-113094,  effective
date February 25, 2004)



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Grant Thornton LLP
New York, New York
September 16, 2004
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1685

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to

Deposit Financial Assistance Program.minority- and women-owned banks by the Bankpermit the continued insurance of deposits in
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1685

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to permit the

continued insurance of deposits in minority- and womenowned banks by the Bank Deposit Financial Assistance

Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The DOE Minority

5 Bank Preservation Act of 1993’’.
2

S 1685 ES

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT RELATING TO THE INSURANCE OF DE2 POSITS BY THE BANK FINANCIAL ASSIST3 ANCE PROGRAM.

4 Section 7(i)(1) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act

5 (12 U.S.C. 1817(i)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘shall be

6 insured’’ and all that follows through the period and in7 serting ‘‘, or funds deposited by an insured depository in8 stitution pursuant to the Bank Deposit Financial Assist9 ance Program of the Department of Energy, shall be sepa10 rately insured in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for

11 each beneficiary of an irrevocable trust or insured deposi12 tory institution depositing such program funds.’’.

13 SEC. 3. MINORITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANTS

14 FOR COMMUNITIES WITH SPECIAL NEEDS.

15 (a) There are hereby authorized to be expended from

16 sums appropriated for water infrastructure financing and

17 other wastewater activities for cities with special needs,

18 no more than $25,000,000 for wastewater treatment

19 projects, including the construction of facilities and related

20 expenses in minority communities with special needs to—

21 (1) improve the housing stock infrastructure in

22 the special needs communities; and

23 (2) abate health hazards caused by groundwater

24 contamination from septage in arid areas with high

25 groundwater levels.
3

S 1685 ES

1 (b) Treatment projects must include innovative tech2 nologies such as vacuum systems and constructed

3 wetlands.

4 (c) For purposes of this section ‘‘cities with special

5 needs’’ includes minority communities with special needs.

6 (1) A ‘‘minority’’ means an African-American, a

7 Hispanic-American, an Asian American or Native

8 American.

9 (2) A ‘‘minority community with special needs’’

10 means—

11 (i) an unincorporated community that,

12 based on the latest census data, has a minority

13 population in excess of 50 percent;

14 (ii) has been unable to issue bonds or oth15 erwise finance a wastewater treatment system

16 itself because its attempt to change its political

17 subdivision has been rejected by the State legis18 lature; and

19 (iii) that the State legislature has appro20 priated funds to help pay for the project.

Passed the Senate November 19 (legislative day, November 2), 1993.

Attest:

Secretary.
EXHIBIT
32.1




STATEMENT
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Thomas
Granville, Chief Executive Officer of Axion Power International, Inc (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:





The
Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Thomas GranvilleThomas
      Granville, Chief Executive OfficerDated:
      March 31,
      2009
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Allen Dodge, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Health Grades, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or cause such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: April 29, 2008      By:                                  /s/ Allen Dodge    Name:  Allen Dodge    Title:  Executive Vice President and
# The Charlie E. Nye DLA Distribution Site of the Year award has been awarded to DLA Distribution Yokosuka Japan site Sasebo

/ Published Sept. 25, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Leading as the tip of the logistical support spear Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Yokosuka, Japan, at Sasebo has been awarded the Charlie E. Nye DLA Distribution Site of the Year award.

Over the course of the 2019 Talisman Saber exercise DDYJ received, consolidated, and shipped out over 3,000 pallets of material to the USS Ronald Raegan and the USS Wasp.

DDYJ successfully enabled the shipboard sustainment of the U.S. Navy’s first F-35B Joint Strike Fighter Deployment on board the USS Wasp and USS America. Over 200 material shipments, in support of F-35 sustainment moved through DDYJ, accomplishing the last “tactical mile” of sustainment that is inherent to DLA Distribution.

he Sasebo site was responsible for loading out over 4,000 pallets of material to support 45 replenishment at sea evolutions for 24 USS ships demonstrating the DLA belief of warfighter always in every action and step.

Through a variety of fluctuating situations and mission requirements the transportation branch at Sasebo still maintained a 99% on time delivery rate, far ahead of the DLA wide goal.

The team of diligent workers and military service members at Sasebo demonstrated the utmost in warfighter always mentality and dedication to the purpose and task of supporting our nation’s warfighters abroad and at sea.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Aquila, Inc.**

**Chief Executive Officer**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 
|   | I, Richard C. Green, certify that: |
|--------|------------------------------------|

 
|   | 1. | Aquila, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2006 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | 2. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aquila, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: May 2, 2006

 
|   | /s/ Richard C. Green |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | Richard C. Green     |  
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 

Aquila, Inc.

 

 

 

  |
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11.1


                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
            (DOLLARS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                            For the Years Ended
                                                                           ---------------------
                                                                               December 31,
                                                                           1997             1996
                                                                           ----             ----
<S>                                                                      <C>              <C>
Basic EPS Calculation:

     Net income available to common shares                               $12,882          $82,961

     Average number of shares outstanding                                 64,020           61,923

     Basic earnings per share                                              $0.20            $1.34


Diluted EPS Calculation:

     Net income available to common shares                               $12,882          $82,961

     Average number of shares outstanding                                 64,020           61,923

     Effect of dilutive stock options                                      2,223               --
                                                                         -------          -------

     Total number of shares outstanding                                   66,243           61,923

     Diluted earnings per share                                            $0.19            $1.34

</TABLE>
160 A.3d 698

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIE TANNER, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
#### Morgan, Matter of, v Stanford

3d Dept: 142 AD3d 1226

denied
No. 09-10664.

#### Richard Paul Riggins, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 848, 131 S. Ct. 97,

178 L. Ed. 2d 60,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5810,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Exhibit 15-1

November 13, 2000

Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
Detroit, Michigan

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company for the periods ended
September 30, 2000 and 1999, as indicated in our report dated November 13,
2000; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-56333 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Detroit, Michigan
No. 09-10329.

#### Derrick Lamont Summers, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 801, 131 S. Ct. 80,

178 L. Ed. 2d 1,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6365.

October 4, 2010.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of *2Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 560 U.S. 563, 130 S. Ct. 2577, 177 L. Ed. 2d 68 (2010).

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Same case below, 361 Fed. Appx. 539.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2003, of ANR Pipeline Company (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Greg G.
Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer certify (i)
that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Greg G. Gruber
                                           Senior Vice President, Chief
                                           Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)

                                           August 13, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ANR Pipeline Company and will be retained by ANR Pipeline Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Pablo Alvarez, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

[62 NYS3d 802]—

*417Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Kalish, J.), entered June 16, 2017, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the motion of defendants New York City School Construction Authority, Skanska USA Building, Inc. and All-Safe, LLC. for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

Dismissal of the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims was warranted in this action where plaintiff was injured when, while working as a plasterer on a school construction project, he hit his head on a tie-in that was securing a scaffold to the school building. The record is devoid of evidence indicating that the . existence or placement of the tie-in constituted a dangerous condition.

Concur—Tom, J.R, Renwick, Mazzarelli, Oing and Singh, JJ.
No. 12-8581.

#### Evans *v.*Felker, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Surplus DOD tanker truck used to haul ethanol for hand sanitizer for Nebraska emergency workers, schools

/ Published Sept. 23, 2020
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
An excess military tanker truck repurposed by the Nebraska Forest Service for firefighting was recently pressed into service as an ethanol hauler for hand sanitizer being used by emergency managers and public schools.****

                Lewis Sieber, Nebraska Forest Service’s equipment managerunloads a tanker the Nebraska Forest Service acquired through the Defense Department’s Firefighter Property Program. Under normal conditions the tanker is used to haul water to help fight wild fires but was pressed into service to transport ethanol that was processed into hand sanitizer.            

                Tanker            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Nebraska Forest Service 

VIRIN: 200508-O-AA987-964

The truck, capable of carrying 5,000 gallons of water, was used to transport ethanol between hand sanitizer production facilities in the state. It was turned in to Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services as excess but found a second life through the Defense Department’s Firefighter Property Program, which shares surplus military gear with the U.S. Forest Service.

The tanker was originally part of the Nebraska Forest Service’s Big Water program, which includes four other former military tankers that are shared among fire departments for local and state-level response, said Lewis Sieber, Nebraska Forest Service’s equipment manager.

Sieber drove the tanker to a facility 45 miles away where the ethanol is loaded and transported 200,000 gallons back to Lincoln, where it’s being used to create hand sanitizer. He also delivered 80,000 gallons of hand sanitizer to public schools.

The tanker will remain configured to haul ethanol until early 2021 but can also be used to support firefighting if needed, Sieber added.
# DLA Troop Support Europe and Africa employees and families build overseas morale with Turkey Trot

/ Published Nov. 22, 2021
KAISERSLAUTERN, Germany, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Europe and Africa hosted a “Turkey Trot” 5K run and 3K walk November 19, 2021, for employees and families living in the local Kaiserslautern area. The event was held on nature trails near Kleber Kaserne to promote team building and increase morale​ prior to the Thanksgiving Holiday. Prizes were awarded for the fastest run time and the best costume.
#### J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. et al., Respondents, v Vigilant Insurance Company et al., Appellants.

[58 NYS3d 38]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered on or about July 7, 2016, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing the affirmative defenses of breach of the contractual obligations to cooperate and to obtain defendants’ consent to settle, and *633denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants’ unreasonable delay in dealing with plaintiffs’ claims under the insurance contracts, consistently stated position that the various regulatory investigations and civil actions concerning plaintiffs’ alleged late trading and marketing-timing transactions did not constitute claims under the contracts, and insistence that in any event disgorgement payments such as those demanded by the regulators were not insurable as a matter of law constitute a denial of liability under the contracts that justifies plaintiffs’ settlement of those claims without defendants’ consent (see *Isadore Rosen & Sons v Security Mut. Ins. Co. of N.Y.,*31 NY2d 342 [1972]). The record does not support defendants’ contention that plaintiffs breached their obligation to cooperate, but in any event defendants’ repudiation of liability for plaintiffs’ claims also excuses plaintiffs from performance of that obligation (see *Lentini Bros. Moving & Stor. Co. v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 53*NY2d 835 [1981]). The “reservation of rights” language in defendants’ letters to plaintiffs does not change this result (see *QBE Ins. Corp. v Jinx-Proof Inc.,*22 NY3d 1105, 1107 [2014]).

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Gische, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
#### Heather H. Kany, Appellant, v Steven Kany, Respondent.

[50 NYS3d 337]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lori S. Sattler, J.), entered on or about September 11, 2015, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) and/or for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212, and for counsel fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s fraud claims are conclusively refuted by the plain terms of the parties’ 1995 written settlement agreement, which was referenced by, and attached as an exhibit to, the complaint. Pursuant to the agreement, plaintiff waived any and all right and claim to “any participation or interest that [defendant] may now or in the future have in any retirement plan.” Thus, she assumed the risk that at the time the agreement was executed defendant had an interest in a retirement plan of which she was not aware. Moreover, plaintiff “specifically acknowledged that she had made her own independent investigation of defendant’s business affairs and was waiving further disclosure” *(DiSalvo v Graff,*227 AD2d 298, 298 [1st Dept 1996]; *and see Kojovic v Goldman,*35 AD3d 65, 68-69 [1st Dept 2006], *lv denied*8 NY3d 804 [2007]).

The allegation that the supplemental retirement benefits were fraudulently concealed from plaintiff is also flatly refuted by the emails and written correspondence submitted on defendant’s motion, many by plaintiff herself. The emails and written correspondence may be considered documentary evidence, because they were submitted to show that defendant’s supplemental retirement assets were disclosed, and they are “essentially undeniable” *(Amsterdam Hospitality Group, LLC v Marshall-Alan Assoc., Inc.,*120 AD3d 431, 433 [1st Dept 2014] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Since, at the very least, the disclosures in defendant’s net worth statement and in the benefits booklet issued by his employer put plaintiff on inquiry notice that defendant was entitled to supplemental retirement benefits, the complaint is time-barred *(see DeLuca v DeLuca,*48 AD3d 341 [1st Dept 2008]; CPLR 213 [8]).

Defendant is entitled to counsel fees under the agreement.

*585We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Moskow-itz, Feinman and Gische, JJ.