alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011014EN.01000501.xml

| 19.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 14/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 14/5

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 July 2010

on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Moldova in Union programmes

(2011/28/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 114, 168, 169, 172, 173(3), 188 and 192, in conjunction with point (a) of Article 218(6), Article 218(7) and the second subparagraph of Article 218(8), thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Moldova in Union programmes (1) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Protocol’) was signed on behalf of the Union on 30 September 2010. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Moldova in Union programmes (1) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Protocol’) was signed on behalf of the Union on 30 September 2010.

| (2) | The Protocol should be concluded, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Protocol should be concluded,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Moldova in Union programmes is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.

Article 2

The President of the Council shall give on behalf of the Union the notification provided for in Article 10 of the Protocol.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2010.

For the Council

The President

S. LARUELLE

---

(1)  See page 2 of this Official Journal.

1

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 23
- 00751
- CR

Alexis Luciano , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 9 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C
- 1
- CR
- 23
- 200063 , THE HONORABLE KIM WILLIAMS , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant Alexis Luciano seeks to appeal p ro se her conviction for indecent

exposure. See Tex. Pena l Code § 21.08. However, the clerk ’ s record does not contain the necessary trial cou r t certification of her right of appeal

. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (requiring
trial court to enter certification of defendant ’ s right of appeal “each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order”), (d) (requiring record to include tri a l court ’ s certification) . On December 21, 2023 , in response to an in quiry from this Court, the Tra vis Coun ty Clerk filed a letter stating that no certif ication has been filed with the clerk ’ s office. Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for
entry of a certification of Luciano ’ s right of appe al

. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 44.4. A2

supplemental clerk ’ s record containing the trial court ’ s certification shall be filed with this Court
no later than January 26 , 202 4

. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2).

It is ordered on J an uary 4 , 202 4

.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, J ustices Smith and Theofanis
Abated and Re manded
Filed: January 4 , 2024
Do Not Publish
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.3
 
  13.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
of China Technology Development Group Corporation (the Registrant);
 14.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;
 15.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this annual report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;
 16.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the Registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;
 (b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date);
and
 (c)
    
    presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 17.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and
 (b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Registrants internal controls; and
 18.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether
or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.
  /s/ Michael SiuName:
    Michael SiuTitle:
    Executive Director, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary
No. 09-951.

#### National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc., Petitioner v. UNITE (Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees, AFL-CIO), et al.

562 U.S. 827, 131 S. Ct. 65,

178 L. Ed. 2d 22,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6197.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 585 F.3d 741.
# Renovation of Disposition Services warehouse on Ft. Bragg begins

/ Published Aug. 3, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, MI, 
DLA Disposition Services’ Ft. Bragg facility in North Carolina is preparing to undergo a series of renovations. 

Work has just begun on a new project that will see site improvements to both safety and performance aspects of its’ warehouse facility. 

Upcoming warehouse improvements include demolishing the existing lights and making way for a new rack system. The inability to replace parts on the old system and an increase in safety are the reasons for installing an entirely new system.

“Safety is always important,” said DLA Installation Management’s Pardeep Kumar. “The previous racks can sometimes create safety hazards. The new rack system  will not completely eliminate accidents but it will reduce accidents tremendously.”

Aside from the safety improvements taking place, the construction team also is installing a new forklift charging station. 

Not everything within the warehouse requires new construction as multiple aspects of the warehouse will undergo repair and cosmetic facelifts. 

Not just Disposition Services’ employees will notice the improvements from this project but customers as well. 

“The operational efficiencies it will generate, especially in terms of physical space and flow, will benefit our customers in a myriad of ways,” said DLA Disposition Services Area Manager Terry Harrington. “We can expect that output, timeliness and asset availability will be greatly enhanced. The return on investment will be tremendous.”

Over the course of this project disposed property may be re-directed to other sites until full operational capability is restored within the Ft. Bragg warehouse facility. Customers will still receive the same support from their disposition service representatives.

Customers will not notice any impact to service or offerings. Internally, over the course of the project, disposed property may be re-directed to other sites until full operational capability is restored within the Ft. Bragg warehouse facility. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers expects a project completion date of March 2022.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers expects a project completion date of March 2022.

----

Discover more about what goes on within DLA's Ft. Bragg operations and check out the video below.

03:19VIDEO  | 03:19 |Logistics On Location: 11th Quartermaster Pack Facility Fort Bragg, NC

----
No. 12-680.

#### Scibilia *v.*Verizon Communications, Inc., et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**STATEMENT
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**




Pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Andrew
      Carr Conway, Jr., chief financial officer of Axion Power International, Inc
      (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:




The
          Company’s Form 10-KSB/A Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
          “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Andrew
                Carr Conway, Jr.Andrew
                Carr Conway, Jr., Chief Financial OfficerDated:
                May 12, 2008
# USS Roosevelt Conducts Replenishment-at-Sea

/ Published April 3, 2021
ATLANTIC OCEAN, 
The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Roosevelt (DDG 80) conducted a scheduled replenishment-at-sea with the dry cargo ship USNS William McClean (T-AKE 12), April 1, 2021.

“Underway replenishments are important evolutions that require the entire crew working together as a team to bring onboard necessary fuel and stores,” said Cmdr. Ryan Kendall, commanding officer of Roosevelt. “As the first major evolution of Patrol 2, I’m pleased with the crew’s proficiency and professionalism throughout the refueling process.”

The replenishment provided Roosevelt 180,000 gallons of F-76 fuel, 10,000 gallons of JP-5 fuel for the embarked MH-60R helicopters, and 11 pallets of food via the Defense Logistics Agency. All the supplies received play an integral part in maintaining the ship’s ability to stay at sea and conduct operations.

“Underway replenishments allow us to remain out at sea and conduct the mission,” said Ensign Ryan Hersch, Roosevelt’s First Lieutenant. “If we were to pull into port to receive stores or fuel, that would take us away from the mission.”

Roosevelt is one of four U.S. Navy destroyers based in Rota, Spain, and assigned to Commander, Task Force 65 in support of NATO’s Integrated Air Missile Defense architecture. These FDNF-E ships have the flexibility to operate throughout the waters of Europe and Africa, from the Cape of Good Hope to the Arctic Circle, demonstrating their mastery of the maritime domain.U.S. Sixth Fleet, headquartered in Naples, Italy, conducts the full spectrum of joint and naval operations, often in concert with allied and interagency partners, in order to advance U.S. national interests and security and stability in Europe and Africa.
Exhibit 23.2


             Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To  the  Board  of  Directors
Newave,  Inc.

We  have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Newave, Inc. as
of December 31, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash
flows,  and  changes  in  stockholders'  equity  for the year then ended.  These
financial  statements  are  the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our
responsibility  is  to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our  audit.

We  conducted  our  audit  in  accordance  with auditing standards of the Public
Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United States).  Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the  financial  statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes
examining,  on  a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the  financial  statements.  An  audit  also  includes  assessing the accounting
principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as well as
evaluating  the  overall  financial statement presentation.  We believe that our
audit  provides  a  reasonable  basis  for  our  opinion.

In  our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Newave,
Inc.  at December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for  the  year  then  ended  in  conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted  in  the  United  States.

The  accompanying  consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that  the  Company  will continue as a going concern.  As described in Note 1 to
the  financial  statements, conditions exist which raise substantial doubt about
the  Company's  ability  to  continue as a going concern.  Management's plans in
regard  to these matters are also discussed in Note 1.  The financial statements
do  not  include  any  adjustments  that  might  result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.




Michael Johnson & Co., LLC
April 11, 2005
#### Simone v. W.C.A.B.(Com. of PA/SCI Graterford)

04/05/2016

623 EAL (2015)

Denied
#### Ryan Rodriguez et al., Respondents, v Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[64 NYS3d 535]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered on or about July 26, 2016, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the common-law negligence and Labor Law § 200 claims as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff Ryan Rodriguez was injured while working on the set of a movie for which defendant was the production company. *448Defendant demonstrated prima facie that it is entitled to benefit, as plaintiff’s “special employer,” from the exclusive remedy doctrine of the Workers’ Compensation Law *(see*Workers’ Compensation Law § 11; *Fung v Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.,*9 NY3d 351, 358-359 [2007]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Sharon Edwards, Petitioner, v Elaine Slobod, Respondent.

[51 NYS3d 897]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prohibit Elaine Slobod, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Orange County, from enforcing a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated November 9, 2016, in an underlying action to foreclose a mortgage pending in that court.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; *see Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.
2017-1653.

#### State v. Montgomery.

Licking App. No. 16 CA 0104, 2017-Ohio-7457. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
# Team building event forges strong bonds between DLA Aviation employees and needy families 

/ Published Dec. 17, 2019
RICHMOND, VA, 
On a chilly, but somewhat sunny Dec. 10 afternoon, a team of folks from Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, led by Marita Beckles, branch chief, Foreign Military Sales and Civil Aviation Team, Air Force Customer Facing Division, Customer Operations Directorate, spent part of their morning inside an abandoned sporting goods store at Stony Point Mall in Richmond, Virginia. I’ll get to why they did this here in a second.

While the store no longer caters to the athletic community, during this time of year, it supports those making a difference in their communities. The Salvation Army Central Virginia set up its annual Christmas Center there in October. The aisles once lined with specialty athletic equipment now filled with donated toys and winter coats. 

Now back to why Beckles and her team were there. She said they were there as part of the Richmond-based Puritan Cleaners Coats for Kids campaign. According to its website, Puritan collects the coats at their area locations, cleans and repairs them and then sends them to the Christmas Center. That’s where Beckles and her team come in. She said they volunteered to sort the thousands of coats donated this year.

“I thought it would be a great idea for the team to give to the community. It’s all about helping others and giving. We are grateful for the opportunity to be able to participate in this event, showing kindness, caring, knowing that families will be warm during the winter season,” she said.

Puritan began participating in the Coats for Kids campaign a little more than three decades ago. Last year, its efforts collected more than 20,000 coats.
#### In the Matter of Ava W., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Rebecca S., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 3.)

[51 NYS3d 920]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. Lo Vallo, J.), entered March 6, 2015. The order, among other things, continued the placement of the subject child with petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Matter of Emily W. (Michael*S.—*Rebecca S.)*([appeal No. 1] 150 AD3d 1707 [2017]).

Present— Centra, J.P., Carni, NeMoyer, Curran and Troutman, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
hereby constitutes and appoints each of John F. Gottshall, David E. Hawkins and
Boyd D. Wainscott his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead, in any and all capabilities, to sign the annual report of Astor Holdings
II, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1997, and any and all
amendments thereto, and to file the same, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitutes or resubstitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

WITNESS our hands this 30 day of June 1997.

/s/ Boyd D. Wainscott              Chairman of the Board of Directors
----------------------------       and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
    Boyd D. Wainscott              Executive Officer)

/s/ C. Richard Spalton             President and Director
----------------------------
    C. Richard Spalton

/s/ John F. Gottshall              Chief Financial officer (Principal 
----------------------------       Financial and Accounting Officer)
    John F. Gottshall

/s/ Alan J. Andreini
----------------------------       Director
    Alan J. Andreini

/s/ Richard R. Crowell             Director
----------------------------
    Richard R. Crowell

/s/ Mark C. Hardy
-----------------------------      Director
    Mark C. Hardy

<PAGE>

/s/ Justin S. Maccarone            Director
----------------------------
    Justin S. Maccarone

/s/ Gerald L. Parsky
----------------------------       Director
    Gerald L. Parsky

/s/ Richard K. Roeder              Director
----------------------------
    Richard K. Roeder

/s/ Charles E. Sax                 Director
----------------------------
    Charles E. Sax

/s/ W. Montague Yort               Director
----------------------------
    W. Montague Yort




                                        2
Order entered May 1, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00188-CV

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL., Appellants

V.

SARAH LAWTON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-09816

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s April 29, 2013 unopposed amended motion for an extension of 

time to file a brief. Appellee shall file her brief on or before May 28, 2013. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1
   
  THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906
 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
   
   Dated:  November 9, 2010
  /s/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
 Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
 President and Chairman of the Board