alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2017-1049.

#### State v. Nelson.

Muskingum App. No. CT2016-0057, 2016-Ohio-2787. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Omar Salas, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 868]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara F. New*633man, J.), rendered June 2, 2016, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of eight years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea *(see People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The record establishes the voluntariness of the plea. That record included a lengthy and thorough plea colloquy in which defendant, among other things, stated that he was not coerced in any way to plead guilty, stated that he was satisfied with his attorney, acknowledged the constitutional rights he was foregoing by pleading guilty, and admitted to committing the crime to which he was pleading guilty. Defendant failed to substantiate his claims that his plea was coerced by the prosecutor or defense counsel, or that counsel rendered ineffective assistance. There is no indication that counsel provided anything less than sound advice to plead guilty under all the circumstances of the case, including a new development that might have led to damaging evidence against defendant. Finally, defendant’s claim that he Aas under the influence of cocaine at the time of the plea was refuted by his responses during the al-locution and the court’s recollection of his demeanor.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Richter, Feinman, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.
No. 09-11055.

#### John Douglas Mitchell, Petitioner v. Orange County, Texas, et al.

562 U.S. 860, 131 S. Ct. 135,

178 L. Ed. 2d 82,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5954.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari of the Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, denied.
No. 09-11182.

#### Mervin G. Anderson, Petitioner v. Juan Castillo, Warden.

562 U.S. 866, 131 S. Ct. 154,

178 L. Ed. 2d 92,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6675,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-226-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes to FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 28, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 22, 1998, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing the following tariff sheets in its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, to be effective May 1, 1998:

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 2701
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 2702

    Koch is submitting these revised tariff sheets to implement 
modifications that neutralize the cash-in and cash-out procedures in 
the case of Prior Period Adjustments (PPA's). Koch proposes to change 
its cash-in and cash-out procedures to the midpoint price for the 
production month that the PPA was identified.
    Koch states that copies of this filing have been served upon Koch's 
customers, state commissions and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission is determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14632 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Viscarello v. Elliott

03/29/2016

983 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 504
EXHIBIT 23.1

             [Letterhead of Shatswell, MacLeod & Company, P.C.]




                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement 
(No. 333-44837) Form S-8 of Falmouth Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated 
October 23, 1998 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Falmouth 
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the 
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity 
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 
September 30, 1998, which report is incorporated by reference in the 
September 30, 1998 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Falmouth Bancorp, Inc.


                                       /s/ Shatswell, MacLeod & Company, P.C.
                                       SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.


West Peabody, Massachusetts
December 28, 1998
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jonathan Velez, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 478]

An appeal having *474been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered May 6, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Richter, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
No. 11-10200.

No. 12-130.

No. 12-581.

No. 12-614.

No. 12-628.

No. 12-6006.

No. 12-6496.

No. 12-6635.

No. 12-6791.

No. 12-6822.

No. 12-6850.

No. 12-6858.

No. 12-6890.

No. 12-6966.

No. 12-7000.

No. 12-7019.

No. 12-7054.

No. 12-7297.

No. 12-7303.

No. 12-7308.

No. 12-7404.

No. 12-7591.

No. 12-7827.

#### Hill *v.*White, Warden, et al., Lemelle *v.*St. Charles Gaming Co., Inc., Allen *v.*CLP Corp., dba McDonald’s, McLean et al. *v.*Ray et al., In re Tabb, Scott *v.*U. S. Bank N. A. et al., Hall *v.*Oregon Department of Corrections, Lewis *v.*Broward County School Board et al., Michau *v.*Warden et al., Marshall *v.*Rudek, Warden, Sanders *v.*Tilton, Warden, Towbridge *v.*Florida Department of Corrections, Lewis *v.*Sheriff’s Department Bossier Parish et al., Tawadrous *v.*Department of the Treasury, Bartholomew *v.*Pasadena Tournament of Roses Assn., Inc., et al., Edwards *v.*Scutt, Warden, Boother *v.*Florida Department of Corrections et al., Ky Tan Le *v.*Social Security Administration, Malone *v.*Merit Systems Protection Board, Widi *v.*United States, Fleming *v.*Wolfe, Anglinmatumona *v.*Micron Corp., In re Licon,

*ante,*p. 836;

*ante,*p. 1141;

*ante,*p. 1124;

*ante,*p. 1144;

*ante,*p. 1142;

*ante,*p. 1092;

*ante,*p. 1050;

*ante,*p. 1094;

*ante,*p. 1097;

*ante,*p. 1098;

*ante,*p. 1098;

*ante,*p. 1099;

*ante,*p. 1099;

*ante,*p. 1102;

*ante,*p. 1103;

*ante,*p. 1126;

*ante,*p. 1127;

*ante,*p. 1131;

*ante,*p. 1107;

*ante,*p. 1108;

*ante,*p. 1110;

*ante,*p. 1133; and

*ante,*p. 1121. Petitions for rehearing denied.
# DLA Indo-Pacific Burnett promoted to major

/ Published Jan. 14, 2022
 JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii, 
Defense Logistics Agency Indo-Pacific Commander Navy Capt. Jason Adams officiated the promotion ceremony of Air Force Maj. Jon Burnett January 10, 2022, on the USS Missouri at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.Major Burnett entered the Air Force in July 2004 and has over 18 years of active-duty service.

He is assigned to DLA Indo-Pacific Camp Smith, Hawaii as a joint logistics plans and exercise officer. In attendance were Burnett’s family, which included his wife, Courtney, their children, Elizabeth, Katherine, and Gavin, and the King, Fields, and Stockstill families. Also in attendance was Burnett’s grandfather retired Navy Chief Warrant Officer 5 Thomas Jackson.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Aquila, Inc.**

**Chief Accounting Officer**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

|   | I, Beth A. Armstrong, certify that: |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

 

|   | 1. | Aquila, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2006 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aquila, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: November 2, 2006

 

|   | /s/ Beth A. Armstrong |
|--------|-----------------------|

|   | Beth A. Armstrong |
|--------|-------------------|

Chief Accounting Officer 

Aquila, Inc.
# ‘IH Troopers’ give added meaning to warfighter support

/ Published March 7, 2019
PHILADELPHIA, 
Supporting the warfighter may be the first of the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support’s main efforts, but one group of employees gave it new meaning, culminating a month-long donation drive with the preparation and shipping of care packages for deployed service members March 6 in Philadelphia. 

The DLA Troop Support Industrial Hardware’s sensing team, known as the “IH Troopers,” assembled and shipped more than 25 care packages, or “Trooper Treat Boxes,” containing a variety of items including sanitary wipes, toothpaste, foot powder, non-perishable snacks and crossword puzzle books, to deployed service members. 

The Troopers, dedicated to motivating the IH workforce through special events that promote areas such as networking and warfighter support, used this event as a way to both bring employees together and support the warfighter in a more personal way.

“That’s the idea,” Gail Kolb, IH purchasing agent and IH Troopers chairperson, said. “You can get to know people in another section of Industrial Hardware, and you get a feeling of satisfaction knowing that the items you donate or pack are going to make a service member’s day.”

Kolb and the Troopers collected donations for the Treat Boxes from all areas of the IH workforce throughout the month of February, giving the workforce a chance to be involved in the project and make a deployed warfighter’s day, Kolb said.  

Army Sgt. 1st Class Jamar Whitehead, Troop Support’s assigned Human Resources noncommissioned officer, shared the positive impact care packages like these have on deployed soldiers. 

“Having previously deployed, I thought it was always really special for folks back home to take their time to send us packages,” Whitehead said. “The packages, letters and messages make you greatly appreciate the support and builds your morale – especially after a long duty day.”
 The IH Troopers’ mission is to motivate employees and raise morale in IH throughout the year, and to encourage networking and event participation for the entire IH workforce.
No. 09-1473.

#### John Deeds, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

562 U.S. 836, 131 S. Ct. 150,

178 L. Ed. 2d 37,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5807.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.

Same case below, 27 So. 3d 1135.
No. 09-10625.

#### Marshall Anthony Smith, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 848, 131 S. Ct. 94,

178 L. Ed. 2d 59,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5896.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2188

For the relief of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for the proportionate

share of tribal funds and annuities under treaties between the

Pottawatomi Nation and the United States, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. INOUYE (for himself and Mr. SIMON) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for

the proportionate share of tribal funds and annuities

under treaties between the Pottawatomi Nation and the

United States, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT.

4 Notwithstanding the sovereign immunity of the

5 United States, any statute of limitations, lapse of time,

6 bar of laches, res judicata, collateral estoppel, or any other

7 procedural defense, or any other provision of law, the Sec8 retary of the Treasury shall pay to the Pottawatomi Na-
2

•S 2188 IS

1 tion in Canada, out of any money in the Treasury of the

2 United States not otherwise appropriated, $llll,

3 which shall be equal to the sum of—

4 (1) the proportionate share of the tribal funds

5 and annuities that arise under treaties between the

6 Pottawatomi Nation and the United States that, but

7 for the residence of the Pottawatomi Nation in Can8 ada and outside of the territorial limits of

9 the United States, would have been compensable

10 under the Indian Claims Commission Act (25 U.S.C.

11 70 et seq.); plus

12 (2) interest computed at a rate of 5 percent per

13 year on the amounts calculated under paragraph (1).

14 SEC. 2. ATTORNEY FEES.

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not more than 10 percent of the

16 amount paid to the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada pursu17 ant to section 1 may be used to pay attorney fees arising

18 from services rendered in connection with claims of the

19 Pottawatomi Nation in Canada relating to the compensa20 tion authorized under such section.

21 (b) PENALTIES.—Any person licensed to practice law

22 in the United States who knowingly receives a payment

23 in violation of subsection (a) shall, upon conviction, be

24 guilty of an infraction under section 3559(a)(9) of title
3

•S 2188 IS

1 18, United States Code, and shall be subject to a fine in

2 an amount not to exceed $1,000.

Æ
# C_2010030EN.01001201.xml

| 6.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5767 — Sorgenia/J&P/Argestis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 30/05

On 3 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5767. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5767. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### Hall v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole

08/22/2016

182 WAL (2016)

Denied
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.3

       The undersigned hereby appoints J. Peter Ricketts as his agent and
attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form
10-K relating to the year ending September 24, 1999, and any amendments
thereto, required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
Ameritrade Holding Corporation.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the 17th day of November, 1999.




/s/ Charles L. Marinaccio
-------------------------
Charles L. Marinaccio, Director
#### Com. v. Taylor

12/08/2015

376 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 455
# Troop Support commander speaks at Anheuser Busch Logistics Professional Development Session

/ Published Feb. 17, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support commander spoke at an Anheuser Busch Logistics Professional Development Session Feb. 11 to discuss his organization’s logistical capabilities and practices.

Army Brig. Gen. Gavin Lawrence provided an overview of DLA Troop Support and its five supply chains, spoke about his leadership philosophy and answered questions from members of the AB Business Services Center Logistics Team during the virtual event.

One of the highlights of the talk was Troop Support’s role in COVID-19 relief efforts. To date, the organization has provided more than $2 billion of DLA’s overall $3.2 billion worth of support to the national response.

“As a nation, we were not positioned where we needed to be domestically to respond immediately to the pandemic,” Lawrence said. “So the White House COVID-19 Task Force was formed. We aligned ourselves with them and got after the acquisition and procurement of items like N95 masks, respirators, nitrile gloves, and such to ensure hospitals and nursing homes across the nation, as well as the Strategic National Stockpile, had the items needed to provide support.”

On leadership, Lawrence said his philosophy is based on five “pillars” of compassion, character, commitment, competence and courage.

“By focusing on these five pillars, we are able to build trust, which is the bedrock of any organization,” he said.

Lawrence said that mutual trust built between employees, his command team, DLA Headquarters and partner DLA commands as well as trust between customers and industry partners fueled his “high performing” organization. Nate Singler, BSC senior director, said the session was very insightful.

“For everybody in the group, this has been a real eye opener in the amount of work that goes into your organization,” he said. “But it’s something we can all relate too, when you think about the logistics of products. We’re all very tied together from that standpoint.”
II

Calendar No. 469

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2200

[Report No. 103–285]

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Election Commission for fiscal

year 1995.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 16 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. FORD, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported the

following original bill; which was read twice and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Federal Election

Commission for fiscal year 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

4 THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION.

5 The second sentence of section 314 of the Federal

6 Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 439c) is amend7 ed—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘1978,’’; and
2

•S 2200 PCS

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and $31,793,000 for the fis2 cal year ending September 30, 1995’’ after ‘‘1981’’.

Calendar No. 469

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2200

[Report No. 103–285]

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Federal

Election Commission for fiscal year 1995.

JUNE 16 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Placed on the calendar
#### In the Matter of Shemar G., Appellant.

[59 NYS3d 78]

Appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Alan Beckoff, J.), dated July 22, 2016. The order of disposition, after a hearing, adjudicated Shemar G. a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review an order of fact-finding of that court dated March 25, 2016, made upon Shemar G.’s admission, finding that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of sexual misconduct.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Upon the conclusion of a juvenile’s dispositional hearing, the Family Court shall enter an order of disposition imposing “the least restrictive available alternative . . . which is consistent with the needs and best interests of the respondent and the need for protection of the community” (Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]). Alternatively, “at any time prior to the entering of a finding,” the court may order “an adjournment of the proceeding, for a period not to exceed six months, with a view to ultimate dismissal of the petition in furtherance of justice” (Family Ct Act § 315.3 [1]; *see Matter of Nigel H.,*136 AD3d 1033, 1034 [2016]). “The Family Court has broad discretion in determining whether to adjourn a proceeding in contemplation *592of dismissal” *(Matter of Nigel H.,*136 AD3d at 1034 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Here, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in rejecting the appellant’s application for an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal, and in imposing a period of probation of 12 months *(see Matter of Donovan E.,*92 AD3d 881, 882 [2012]). The offense in this case was a serious sex offense, committed against a nine-year-old child. The Probation Department recommended a disposition of 12 months of probation, to insure adequate supervision of the appellant during that period.

Austin, J.P., Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.
OIT Staff

Jason Glumac, IT Manager

Matt Belfoure

Johnny Shin

Gary W. Baughman

Director

Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division

Warren Smith

Manager

2705 Community Involvement

Fred Dowsett (0.40)

Compliance Advisor

2705

Dave Smith

Administration Program Manager

2710

Cris Pretko

Chief Fiscal Officer

2710 Fiscal & Administrative Services

Joe Garmatz

Chief Fiscal Analyst

2710 Financial Services

Jodi Hesch

Coordinator

2710 Human Resource & Training Services

Cris Pretko (Interim)

Manager

2710 Information Management

Joe Schieffelin

Solid & Hazardous Waste Program Manager

2805

Mira Neumiller

Unit Leader

2805 Financial Assurance & Data Mgmt

Kathryn Stewart

Unit Leader

2850 Haz Waste Compliance Assurance

Doug Knappe

Unit Leader

2810 Hazardous Waste Permitting

Edward Smith

Unit Leader

2815 Compliance Coordination & Assistance

Walter Avramenko

Unit Leader

2860 Hazardous Waste Corrective Action

Charles Johnson

Solid Waste Program Manager

2830

Roger Doak

Unit Leader

2830 Permitting Unit

Jerry Henderson

Unit Leader

2830 SW Compliance Assurance Unit

Material Management

Group

2830

Dan Scheppers

Remediation Program Manager

2900

Claudette Ferris

Administrative Support

2900

John Aaron

Vac. Pos. #2596 (GP II‐Peasley)

2900 Contracts & Procurement

Doug Jamison

Unit Leader

2910 Superfund/VCRA Unit

Monica Sheets

Unit Leader

2920 FF Remediation & Restoration

Barbara Nabors

Unit Leader

2940 Superfund PA/SI Unit

Michael Cosby

Kate Elsberry

2942 Umtra