alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2016-1672.

#### In re A.B.

Hamilton App. No. C-150743.

Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

William A. Klatt, J., of the Tenth District Court of Appeals, sitting for Fischer, J.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                        PACIFICARE HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
 
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                  STATE OF INCORPORATION/PARTNERSHIP
                ------------------                  ----------------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>
CRM Insurance Services, Inc.                        California
FHP International Corporation                       Delaware
FHP Reinsurance Limited                             Bermuda
Health Maintenance Life, Inc.                       Guam
PacifiCare Behavioral Health of California, Inc.    Delaware
PacifiCare Behavioral Health, Inc.                  Delaware
PacifiCare Benefit Administrators, Inc.             Washington
PacifiCare Credentialing, Inc.                      California
PacifiCare Dental and Vision                        California
PacifiCare Dental of Colorado, Inc.                 Colorado
PacifiCare Health Plan Administrators, Inc.         Indiana
PacifiCare Life and Health Insurance Company        Indiana
PacifiCare Life Assurance Company                   Colorado
PacifiCare Life Insurance Company                   Arizona
PacifiCare of Arizona, Inc.                         Arizona
PacifiCare of California                            California
PacifiCare of Colorado, Inc.                        Colorado
PacifiCare of Nevada, Inc.                          Nevada
PacifiCare of Ohio, Inc.                            Ohio
PacifiCare of Oklahoma, Inc.                        Oklahoma
PacifiCare of Oregon, Inc.                          Oregon
PacifiCare of Texas, Inc.                           Texas
PacifiCare of Washington, Inc.                      Washington
PacifiCare Operations, Inc.                         Delaware
PacifiCare Pharmacy Centers, Inc.                   California
PacifiCare Ventures, Inc.                           California
PC-CWD Vista Associates                             California
Secure Horizons USA, Inc.                           California
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
S. Steiner, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

November 10, 2004

                                       /s/ Michael Steiner
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Michael S. Steiner
                                       Principal Executive Officer
# DLA   Installation Support Susquehanna chief of security and emergency services  retires after 39 years

/ Published Aug. 18, 2021
NEW CUMEBERLAND, Pa., 
Following 39 years of federal service, Harold “George” Hokkanen, chief, security and emergency services, will retire from Defense Logistics Agency Installation Support Susquehanna in September.

Hokkanen’s career began in October 1982 when he enlisted in the Army. Over the course of 29 years of Army service he would attain the rank of Sergeant Major. His final assignment in the Army was as the emergency services/protection services sergeant major at Headquarters, Installation Management Command in Crystal City, Virginia.

With so many years of service, Hokkanen witnessed major changes in the life of a warfighter and the changes behind the curtain that go into supporting the warfighter. During his time in service, Hokkanen noticed better attention paid to the physical and mental health of our warfighters, a greater emphasis placed on personal and professional development and greatly enhanced survivability on the battlefield.

“We have achieved an almost on demand logistical capability,” said Hokkanen.

The time spent in service with the Army gave Hokkanen insights on a global stage. “I have been many places and seen many things, some good and some bad, as part of my military career. These experiences have cemented my belief that despite its problems, the United States is the best country in the world,” said Hokkanen.

Joining DLA following his time in the Army allowed Hokkanen a smooth transition from being the warfighter to supporting the warfighter.

Integrity and candor are the top two traits Hokkanen cites as the best recipe for success. “Remember the golden rule, and allow subordinates to learn, grow and succeed through mentorship,” said Hokkanen.

Hokkanen’s military awards and decorations include the Legion of Merit, the Bronze Star, the Meritorious Service Medal with three oak leaf clusters and numerous other awards and decorations. His career includes combat deployments to Panama, Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan.

                George Hokkanen, chief, Security and Emergency Services, accepts a coin on behalf of Defense Logistics Agency Installation Support Susquehanna Emergency Services  (Fire, Police & Security) from DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic during her visit to DLA Distribution May 13, 2021.  (Photo by Dawn Bonsell, DLA Distribution PAO)                            DLA   Installation Support Susquehanna chief of security and emergency services  retires after 39 years                            George Hokkanen, chief, Security and Emergency Services, accepts a coin on behalf of Defense Logistics Agency Installation Support Susquehanna Emergency Services  (Fire, Police & Security) from DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic during her visit to DLA Distribution May 13, 2021.  (Photo by Dawn Bonsell, DLA Distribution PAO)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Dawn BonsellVIRIN: 210513-D-KL823-0004
No. 09-1479.

#### Richard A. Simoneaux, Petitioner v. Mississippi.

562 U.S. 836, 131 S. Ct. 151,

178 L. Ed. 2d 38,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6093.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.

Same case below, 29 So. 3d 26.
# 60th Anniversary: Associate Lori Phillips shares thoughts on decades of service with agency

/ Published Aug. 27, 2021
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
DLA Land and Maritime’s Lori Phillips talks about her history with the agency for DLA's 60th Anniversary in this video.

05:38VIDEO  | 05:38 |In Their Own Words Lori Phillips, DLA Land and Maritime, DLA 60th Anniversary Interview

----
Exhibit 15.14




CONSENT




We hereby consent to the reference to our “Valuation of certain acquired intangible and tangible assets of EDT Retail Trust" as of June 18, 2010, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging Ltd. and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-172122) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd.




This consent is not to be construed as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to be filed under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.




/s/ Giza Zinger Ltd


Giza Zinger Even


Tel Aviv, Israel


November 26, 2013
#### Heim v. Merchants Ins. Group 29

03/23/2016

934 MAL (2015)

29

. Reconsideration Denied May 3, 2016.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 484
### GHG/FE NPRM **Meeting** Thursday, January

6, 2011 9:00 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. U. S. EPA 2000 Traverwood Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan **AGENDA** 9:00 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. Welcome , Goals, and Process for Moving F orward 9:30 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Engine and Hy brid Issues 11:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. Vehicle and Vehicle Technology I ssues and Lunch 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. Flexibility and Programmatic I ssues 2:30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. Conclusions and Next Steps

43959_1
No. 09-10675.

#### Alvin Williams, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 849, 131 S. Ct. 98,

178 L. Ed. 2d 61,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5923.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 394 Ill. App. 3d 236, 333 Ill. Dec. 222, 914 N.E.2d 641.
No. 10M18.

#### David Appleby, Petitioner v. Evelyn Seifert, Warden.

562 U.S. 819, 131 S. Ct. 375,

178 L. Ed. 2d 12,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6542.

October 4, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Same case below, 595 F.3d 532.
160 A.3d 711

#### NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. J.L.H., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF C.M.H. AND J.J.H., -MINORS-RESPONDENTS.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of
Microvision, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)     the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:August 6, 2009 | By: /s/ Alexander Y. Tokman   Alexander Y. Tokman 
 Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
No. 09-1284.

#### Leonard McSherry, Petitioner v. City of Long Beach, California, et al.

562 U.S. 829, 131 S. Ct. 79,

178 L. Ed. 2d 26,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6301.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 584 F.3d 1129.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                                DIXON HUGHES PLLC
                    Certified Public Accountants and Advisors

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
First South Bancorp, Inc.
Washington, North Carolina

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-49759 and 33-104144) on Form S-8 of First South Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
of our report dated February 22, 2005 with respect to the consolidated
statements of financial condition of First South Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as
of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2004, which report is incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form
10-K of First South Bancorp, Inc.

/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC

Sanford, North Carolina
March 11, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyshell Williams, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 362]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Eugene Oliver, J.), rendered September 30, 2015, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing her to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence established that defendant furnished a weapon to the codefendant, who fired it at the victims.

The court providently exercised its discretion in permitting the People to introduce a diagram for the purpose of aiding the jury in understanding the complex relationship among various persons involved in the incident *(see People v Del Vermo,*192 NY 470, 482 [1908]; *People v Shields,*100 AD3d 549, 550-551 [1st Dept 2012]), and in admitting evidence of a prior altercation that provided relevant background to the charged crime *(see People v Dorm,*12 NY3d 16, 19 [2009]).

The court did not err in giving the jury a lunch recess during the prosecutor’s summation, which had followed summations by the attorneys for defendant and the codefendant. Such scheduling matters are addressed to the court’s sound discretion *(see People v Spears,*64 NY2d 698, 699-700 [1984]), and defendant has not shown any resulting prejudice.

Concur— Richter, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sharod Baker, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 232]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 22, 1998 *(People v Baker,*251 AD2d 592 [1998]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 4, 1996.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Balkin, J.P., Hall, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1641056
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   366744
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    2602592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5259424
<PP&E>                                         6533325
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3025216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                10245182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1863433
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        825649
<OTHER-SE>                                     4251711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  10245182
<SALES>                                        4790258
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4790258
<CGS>                                          3475871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4204201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  8682
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               19027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 562619
<INCOME-TAX>                                    219422
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    343198
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2199 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 586
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2199

                          [Report No. 103-344]

  To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel EMERALD 
                                 AYES.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 16 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

 Mr. Hollings introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

              August 19 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

              Reported by Mr. Hollings, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel EMERALD 
                                 AYES.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel 
EMERALD AYES, United States official number 986099.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 586

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2199

                          [Report No. 103-344]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel EMERALD 
                                 AYES.

_______________________________________________________________________

              August 19 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
```
2017-0539.

#### State v. Dubose.

Lucas App. No. L-15-1194, 2016-Ohio-7883. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., dissents.
#### Lina T. Duran Cardona, Respondent, v Ellen E. Fiorentina, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 324]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on or about February 11, 2016, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Defendant established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that , she had a green light in her favor before and after she entered the intersection, and that plaintiff made a left turn into the path of defendant’s oncoming vehicle, causing the collision *(see Abboud v Pawelec,*141 AD3d 438 [1st Dept 2016]; *Griffin v Pennoyer,*49 AD3d 341 [1st Dept 2008]; Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141). In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Despite having seen defendant’s vehicle approaching when it was 6 to 7 car lengths from the intersection, plaintiff began her left turn in front of defendant’s vehicle. It was allegedly not until plaintiff began her turn that she noticed that defendant’s vehicle was traveling at a high rate of speed. Such speculative assertions do not warrant denial of the motion *(see Guerrero v Milla,*135 AD3d 635 [1st Dept 2016]; *Cadeau v Gregorio,*104 AD3d 464 [1st Dept 2013]).

Concur — Friedman, J.R, Richter, Mazzarelli, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
160 A.3d 700

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GABRIEL ROMERO SANCHEZ, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
No. 09-1557.

#### Patco Energy Express, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Michael G. Lambros.

562 U.S. 840, 131 S. Ct. 206,

178 L. Ed. 2d 45,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5882.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

*46Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 379.
#### In the Matter of Darcel D. Clark, Petitioner, v George R. Villegas et al., Respondents.

[61 NYS3d 1]

Petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the enforcement of an order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George R. Villegas, J.), entered on or about April 10, 2017, which ordered respondent New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) to credit respondent Dewayne Robinson with 1,282 days of jail time, unanimously granted, without costs. Respondents are prohibited from enforcing the order.

Petitioner seeks to prohibit respondents from enforcing an order directing DOCCS to credit respondent Robinson with jail time that he never actually served. Justice George R. Villegas has elected, pursuant to CPLR 7804 (i), not to appear in this proceeding. We conclude that this article 78 proceeding is the proper procedural vehicle for the relief sought *(see Matter of Pirro v Angiolillo,*89 NY2d 351, 355 [1996]; *Matter of Holtzman*
      *438
      *v*Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]), and we agree with petitioner that Justice Villegas acted in excess of his authorized powers by granting Robinson’s motion to reargue his motion for jail time credit on the ground of noncompliance with CPL 460.50 (5) and directing DOCCS to credit Robinson with the time. We also find that petitioner has a substantial interest in the outcome of Robinson’s prosecution, and a right to pursue relief by writ of prohibition where, as here, the conviction and sentence resulted from a trial by jury rather than pursuant to a plea bargain *(see Pirro v Angiolillo,*89 NY2d at 360). A court would be authorized to entertain Robinson’s request for jail time credit for noncompliance with CPL 460.50 (5) only if Robinson commenced an article 78 proceeding to compel DOCCS to grant the credit *(see e.g. Matter of Hooray v Cummings,*89 AD2d 790 [4th Dept 1982]; *Matter of Holland v La Vallee,*63 AD2d 989 [2d Dept 1978], *lv denied*45 NY2d 710 [1978]). Accordingly, we do not here reach the underlying merits.

In the absence of an available remedy at law *(see*CPL 450.20), and upon a finding that substantial harm implicating the public interest would result if the order were not overturned, we grant the writ of prohibition.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
*October 2,*2017

2017-Ohio-7992.]

2017-0007.

#### Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2016-164 and 2016-176. On agreed motion to remand to implement settlement. Motion granted. The cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to take further actions as appropriate.
#### Harvey v. Palumbo; Con-way Freight, Inc., In re

10/27/2015

196 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 388