alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-1407.

#### Curtis Jones, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 832, 131 S. Ct. 110,

178 L. Ed. 2d 32,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6234.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District, denied.

Same case below, 605 Pa. 188, 988 A.2d 649.
No. 09-11339.

#### Mohamed Adam Abdelshafi, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 874, 131 S. Ct. 182,

178 L. Ed. 2d 108,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6648.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*109Same case below, 592 F.3d 602.
# Marine Corps turns 244

/ Published Nov. 18, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Supply Center Columbus commemorated the U.S. Marine Corps’ 244th birthday Nov. 13 in a “Tun Tavern”-style celebration at the installation’s Bunker reception hall hosted by the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime.

In military lore, Tun Tavern was a Philadelphia tavern and brewery regarded as the site where what became the United States Marine Corps held its first recruitment drive during the American Revolution.

The afternoon event began with a video message from the current Marine Corps commandant Gen. David Berger, followed by the Marine Prayer and the reading of Gen. John Lejeune’s 1921 birthday message to the Corps. Lejeune was the Marine Corps’ 13th commandant and namesake of Camp Lejeune, a military training facility in North Carolina. 

The reading was followed by the traditional cake-cutting with the oldest and youngest Marine. Former Whitehall Mayor and Marine veteran John Wolfe and Shane Kurilla, a retired Marine with the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, had the honor of eating the first slices.

Event organizer Marine Corps Maj. Jeffrey Cisek said celebrating the service’s birthday is an opportunity to bring past and present service members together and remind them of the support around them.

“We’re here for each other, and whether we’re fighting some mission in a hot place, a cold place, under fire or helping each other with our families, we’re here for each other,” said Cisek, a deputy division chief in DLA Land and Maritime’s Land Customer Operations Directorate.

DLA Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear. Adm. John Palmer closed out the event, citing takeaways from career assignments where he worked with Marines and saw their contributions up close. 

“They do a wonderful job – their reputation goes before them – and that says a lot about the great legacy left by so many people. I thank you all for your great service to the U.S. Marine Corps,” Palmer concluded.
No. 10-5432.

#### John McCord, et ux., Petitioners v. Alabama.

562 U.S. 824, 131 S. Ct. 386,

178 L. Ed. 2d 20,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6687.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 25, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 590.
No. 12-8331.

#### Trinidad-Cotto *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-84566, 333-76698,
333-62444 and 333-41782 and Form S-8 Nos. 333-110058, 333-97609, 333-62414, 333-62410, 333-62406,
333-94345, 333-41477 and 333-57879) and related Prospectuses of EPIX Medical, Inc. of our report dated February 6, 2004, with respect to the financial
statements of EPIX Medical, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

|                                    |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Boston, Massachusetts
March 2, 2004 |  |                      

---
No. 09-11185.

#### Chedrick Crummie, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 866, 131 S. Ct. 155,

178 L. Ed. 2d 93,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6495.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 20.
No. 09-10964.

#### Lennell M. Martin, Petitioner v. Robert Fanies, Warden.

562 U.S. 857, 131 S. Ct. 125,

178 L. Ed. 2d 76,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6233.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 365 Fed. Appx. 736.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Bryan Regan Photography
400 E. Martin St. Raleigh NC 27601
bryan@bryanreganphotography.com
# Nuclear enterprise, process improvement champion to be inducted into DLA Hall of Fame

/ Published June 11, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
*Editor’s note: This is the second of nine stories featuring 2020 DLA Hall of Fame inductees. A video highlighting inductees’ contributions to the agency will be broadcast on DLA’s Facebook page June 23.*

The Defense Logistics Agency director best known for reaffirming the agency’s commitment to the nuclear enterprise is among nine new inductees into the 2020 DLA Hall of Fame. 

Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch was the agency’s 18th director and only the second one to have served in three different assignments at DLA. He joined the agency in 1995 as chief of weapons system readiness and led a five-person team that measured DLA’s impact on military readiness. 

In June 2007, Busch took command of DLA Aviation, then Defense Supply Center Richmond, which had just been directed to assume responsibility for retail logistics by transferring supply, storage and distribution functions from air logistics centers and navy fleet readiness centers according to 2005 Base Realignment and Closure decisions.

“General Busch played a lead role in implementing the daunting, complex and sometimes controversial BRAC decisions. Under his leadership, logistics functions were transferred flawlessly while providing uninterrupted support to the industrial support activities,” according to his nomination. 

He became the DLA director in 2014 and established the Nuclear Enterprise Support Office, guiding investments in repair parts inventory that led to a 24% increase in nuclear parts orders in the next three years. Busch also improved operational support by making DLA regional commanders the agency’s “single face” to combatant commanders and created an enduring rapid deployment capability to support disaster relief and humanitarian assistance. 

As a champion of Continuous Process Improvement, Busch charged the agency with creating proven, repeatable processes and strategies to maintain cost savings and audit sustainment. His commitment to employee resilience and wellbeing were also evident in the 12-point jump in DLA’s overall score and improvements in 11 of 12 categories in the 2014 DLA Culture and Climate Survey.

“Many of General Busch’s successes at DLA serve as the blueprint for the outstanding support DLA provides to the warfighter today,” according to his award citation. He will be inducted later this year. *Editor's note: View Busch's segment of the 2020 DLA Hall of Fame ceremony video from June 23:*
#### Com. v. Dip

08/24/2016

149 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 194
#### People v Ramos

2d Dept: 147 AD3d 1090

denied
No. 10-26.

#### Michael R. Wood, Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, San Joaquin County, et al.

562 U.S. 890, 131 S. Ct. 244,

178 L. Ed. 2d 137,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6698.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, denied.
Employee Reflection: Takayuki Honda
 
  Environmental Engineer Technician and Hazardous Waste COR
DLA Disposition Services Sagami **DLA Disposition Services Environmental Engineer Technician Takayuki Honda is considered the DLA hazardous waste disposal subject matter expert by U.S. Forces Japan military generators.




Man in front of white blossom tree
        Takayuki Honda
            DLA Disposition Services Environmental Engineer Technician Takayuki Honda is considered the DLA hazardous waste disposal subject matter expert by U.S. Forces Japan military generators.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Courtesy Photo DLA Disposition Services
                    
                    VIRIN: 220331-D-D0441-600** I have worked for Disposition Services Sagami Environmental Office for over 23 years.  I support the military installations with hazardous material reutilization, transfer and donations and hazardous waste disposal support.  I also provide support to U.S. Forces Japan for environmental issues and provide technical support. **What was your first job?** My first job was Cargo truck body design by CAD.  Before DLA, I worked for NAF Atsugi PWC as a Transportation Maintenance Manager MLC 2-10 and Environmental Engineer/HW Manager MLC 1-7 for a total of five years from 1990-95. **What is your favorite memory with Disposition Services?** My favorite memory with Disposition Services is the teamwork effort about polychlorinated biphenyls. also known as PCBs, retrograde to U. S. **What is your favorite part of your job?** My favorite part of my job is hazardous waste disposal advice to generators. Because we offer direct operational support to hazardous waste generators for waters such as perfluorooctane sulfonic acid/perfluorinated alkylated substances, more commonly known as PFOS/PFOA. **What has been the most helpful training you have received?** The training most helpful for my job has been R510 Transportation of HM/HW for DOD (DoT) and Resource Conservation And Recovery Act (RCRA) Annual Refresher.  These help a lot for daily work and are fundamental training for environmental operation. **What has been the most exciting thing you've done?** The most thrilling thrilling/adventurous thing I ever did was in 1988 - my first U. S. trip to Sun Francisco.  Thrilling and adventurous because I could not speak English well and my friend helped me a lot. Since then, I have started English learning almost every day.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2696-004]


Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation; Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

June 1, 1998.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Regulations, 18 CFR Part 
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Commission's Office of Hydropower 
Licensing has reviewed the license surrender application for the 
Stuyvesant Falls Project, No. 2696-004. The Stuyvesant Falls Project is 
located on Kinderhook Creek in Columbia County, New York. The licensee 
is applying for a surrender of the license due to leaks in the 
pipelines that are uneconomical to repair for safe and effective 
operation of the project. A Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) was 
prepared for the application. The FEA finds that approving the 
application would not constitute a major federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the FEA are available for review in the Commission's 
Reference and Information Center, Room 2A, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. For further information, please contact Ms. 
Hillary Berlin, at (202) 219-0038.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14965 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### In the Matter of Charles Pulci, Petitioner, v Raymond W. Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

[767 NYS2d 604]

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated March 23, 2002, which, after an administrative hearing, found petitioner guilty of striking his wife and daughter and causing injury to both, imposed forfeiture of 30 vacation days in addition to 11 days suspension without pay, and placed petitioner on dismissal probation for one year, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Joan Madden, J.], entered August 26, 2002) dismissed, without costs.

The administrative determination is supported by substantial evidence—particularly, the testimony of two responding police officers and the transcript of a police interview with petitioner’s wife *(Matter of Wagner v Kerik,*298 AD2d 322 [2002]). The penalty imposed does not shock our sense of fairness *(id.).*Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
No. 12-7966.

#### Monzon *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1090705
<SECURITIES>                                    100000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   226043
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    2225002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4775773
<PP&E>                                         6450863
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2392950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9851178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1554349
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        825649
<OTHER-SE>                                     3965930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9851178
<SALES>                                       12326097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              12326097
<CGS>                                          9595623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 11941519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (23387)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               76955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 331010
<INCOME-TAX>                                    126098
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    204912
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summarized financial information extracted
from the Mountain Fuel Supply Co. Statement of Income and Balance Sheet for
the period ended September 30, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,873
<PP&E>                                         806,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                 319,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 565,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,643
<BONDS>                                        175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,840
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,974
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   565,179
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,027
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  188,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,366
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,787
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,787
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2213 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2213

  To make applicable the provisions of the Act commonly known as the 
    ``Warren Act'' to the Central Utah Project, Utah, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 20 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

Mr. Bennett (for himself and Mr. Hatch) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To make applicable the provisions of the Act commonly known as the 
    ``Warren Act'' to the Central Utah Project, Utah, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF THE WARREN ACT.

    (a) Authority.--The Secretary of the Interior may--
            (1) enter into contracts with private entities pursuant to 
        the Act of February 21, 1911 (commonly known as the ``Warren 
        Act'') (36 Stat. 925 et seq., chapter 141; 43 U.S.C. 523), for 
        the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject water for 
        domestic, municipal, fish and wildlife, industrial, and other 
        beneficial purposes, using any facilities associated with the 
        Central Utah Project, Utah; and
            (2) enter into agreements, under terms and conditions 
        authorized for contracts under such Act, with appropriate 
        officials of other Federal agencies, municipalities, public 
        water districts and agencies, and States for impounding, 
        storage, and carriage of nonproject water for purposes 
        described in paragraph (1) using facilities referred to in such 
        paragraph.
    (b) Nonproject Water Defined.--In subsection (a), the term 
``nonproject water'' means water that is not from a Federal Reclamation 
project.

                                 <all>
```
No. 09-1468.

#### Joseph A. O’Toole, Petitioner v. Northrop Grumman Corporation.

562 U.S. 835, 131 S. Ct. 144,

178 L. Ed. 2d 37,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5799.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 472.
# Local Pennsylvania Rotary Club visit to DLA Distribution highlights growth, technology 

/ Published Oct. 31, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Much has changed since retired Army Col. George Connolly was assigned to the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, more than 30 years ago. 

The agency’s role in supporting Department of Defense operations and humanitarian assistance grew dramatically beginning with Operation Desert Shield in 1990 and continued through now more than 18 years of military deployments in support of the Global War on Terror. Warehouses at the New Cumberland facility have expanded and become much more automated. Global positioning satellites now make tracking cargo more detailed than ever.

Now in his 80s, Connolly is a member of the Harrisburg-affiliated Rotary Club of the West Shore, who visited DLA Distribution for a command overview and tour of DLA’s Eastern Distribution Center. Connolly says he was impressed with what he saw but adds, while technology has evolved, he’s happy to see that the mission and focus of DLA employees has stayed the same.

“You can see that change being activated in new buildings, new facilities, new ways to do things,” Connolly says. “It’s updated, they’ve made a lot of changes, they’ve expanded quite a bit, yet there are still things that are pretty much the same since back then. But you put the old with the new and you get a lot of improvement and of course that affects the operation because it makes it easier for everybody.”

Charles Cenkner, another member of the Rotary Club, says the EDC has grown quite a bit since his last tour more than 20 years ago.

“Compared to my last visit here it has made an amazing transformation,” Cenkner says. “To me it’s an evolution that really has matured. The big question in what is the facility going to look like five or 10 years from now? Because things move much quicker today than they did 10 or 20 years ago.”

Connolly and Cenkner say that visits from civic groups like theirs is an essential part of community relations for both organizations. 

“The more people you have like us that carry your message out to the community and spread it among families and other business professionals is helpful,” says Cenkner.

Connolly agrees, adding, “The scope of DLA’s operation is not just here it’s all over the world. And it’s what gets to our troops in the world that makes them so effective at what they do because they’re supplied through this type of operation.”

Video:
2017-1547.

#### State v. Cupp.

Geauga App. No. 2016-G-0097, 2017-Ohio-7948.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2017-1701, *State v. Cupp,*and briefing in Nos. 2017-1701 and 2017-1547 shall be consolidated. The parties shall file two originals of each of the briefs permitted under S.Ct.Prae.R. 16.02 through 16.04 and include both case numbers on the cover page of the briefs. The parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.CtPrac.R. 16.01 through 16.04.

French and DeWine, JJ., dissent.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
#### CMSG Restaurant Group, LLC, Doing Business as Larry Flynt’s Hustler Club, et al., Appellants, v State of New York et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 3, 2017;

decided March 28, 2017

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.