alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Illinois school receives $55k in computers

/ Published Sept. 15, 2020
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
More than $2 million in free technology has gone to schools in fiscal 2020 through the Defense Logistics Agency-managed DOD Computers For Learning.

First-time program recipient Schlarman Academy, a K-12 institution in Danville, Illinois, provided an example of the program’s potential by receiving 61 personal computers this year.

“These computers were a major upgrade for us,” said David Calkins, who serves as Schlarman’s technology coordinator. “The computers that we previously had in use at our high school campus were at least 10 years old and running Windows 7 and Office 2010. The lab of computers at our elementary school were from 2008. We were running all Windows 7 machines and Office 2010 in that lab, also.”

Schlarman Academy received 50 out of 94 “new in the box” computers turned in to the DLA Disposition Services Susquehanna property disposal site by an Army unit at the Watervliet Arsenal in New York’s Hudson River Valley. Another 11 computers came from the DLA site in Fort Riley, Kansas. The entire process, from request to receipt, took about a month, Calkins said, and saved the school a substantial amount of money.

“New computers for the elementary school lab, high school classroom and general use computer lab would have cost us around $55,000,” Calkins said. “We were able to get the computers from Susquehanna for the cost of shipping – approximately $1,800.”

Calkins said the only work required on the machines, accomplished with the volunteer help of some parents and students, was unboxing them, installing both the Windows 10 operating system and Office 2019, then adding school software.

“The students of Schlarman Academy have been in need of new computers within both buildings for a long time,” said Principal Mark Janesky, noting that more than 300 students use the PCs regularly. “The installation of new computers in the grade school building has even allowed us to introduce new instructional classes in computer science to all of the kindergarten through 6th grade students. The new machines at the junior high and high school building allow students to use up-to-date hardware and software for many class projects and assignments.”

Calkins said he screens for property regularly and first became aware of DOD’s CFL offerings about a decade ago and has received some monitors and laptops through a similar General Services Administration donation program in the past.

“I will log in to the website to look at anything that looks like it would work for us,” Calkins said. “Mostly, we are looking for desktop computers, monitors, and laptop computers, as those are the greatest need for our school. We do check the list for other items like servers and printers if they are close enough to the school to drive and pick up.”

More information on Computers For Learning can be found at the DLA website.
No. 12-6265.

#### Mudlock *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Equipment from DLA Disposition Services helps Kempner Volunteer Fire Department expands fire service
 By DLA Disposition Services Public Affairs
  Under the Department of Defense Firefighter Program a five-ton truck from the military transferred to the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services as excess is now fighting Texas fires with the Kempner Volunteer Fire Department. The program is a partnership between DLA Disposition Services and the US Forest Service. The intent is to get used military equipment into the hands of firefighters in rural communities. **An excess military truck from the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services was converted into a firetruck by the Kempner Volunteer Fire Department. The firefighters used the Department of Defense Firefighter Program to obtain the truck.




A former military truck is show with a new red paint job and now looking like a fire truck.
        Old truck new job
            An excess military truck from the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services was converted into a firetruck by the Kempner Volunteer Fire Department. The firefighters used the Department of Defense Firefighter Program to obtain the truck.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Kempner Volunteer Fire Department
                    
                    VIRIN: 210629-O-AA987-123**Upon acceptance of the truck the department met the conversion challenge by doing the work in house, while keeping in mind the growing community and the future addition of Fire Station NumberThree. “We have a new subdivision being built that will have over 190 new homes,” said Kempner VFD Fire Chief Dan Hause. “We built this new fleet addition with the knowledge that it could be useful in helping to protect those homes and our predominantly rural area.” The truck was designed for rough terrain and longer staying power. “Typically brush trucks are smaller and carry less water so this tender with its 1,000-gallon water capacity will be a great asset,” said Hause. According to Hause the truck is well equipped for the job and can also be used as a tender that can transport water to an emergency scene and has defensive capability to suppress fires. “Like a lot of volunteer fire departments, staffing can be a problem at times, but we equipped this truck so if we have only a few firefighters to respond to a call they can knock the fire down quickly and safely,” said Hause. This rugged apparatus with all-wheel drive makes this truck a great option for transporting water to fire trucks engaged on the fire line in the field. “It will be an enormous benefit to Kempner Volunteer Fire Department to have this large brush truck in their fleet,” said Texas A&M Forest Service Regional Fire Coordinator Matthew Schlaefer. “Having a large quantity of water at the onset of a fire will give the firefighters the upper hand to help slow the fires growth.”
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-113094 on Form S-8 and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 333-113094 on Form S-8 of our reports dated August 21, 2006,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Bioenvision,
Inc. and subsidiaries and Bioenvision, Inc.'s management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting of Bioenvision, Inc. as of June 30,
2006 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bioenvision, Inc. for the
year ended June 30, 2006.


/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP

Roseland, New Jersey
September 6, 2006
<PAGE>

March 1, 2001


Joel Morganroth, M.D.
PRWW, Ltd.
30 S. 17th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Dear Joel:

         This will confirm that you and PRWW, Ltd. (together with its
affiliates, "PRWW") have agreed as follows:

         1. By mutual agreement, both the Management Employment Agreement
between you and PRWW date September 7, 1999 (the "Employment Agreement") and
your employment with PRWW have terminated effective March 1, 2001, without
liability to any party.

         2. From and after March 1, 2001 you will not be eligible to participate
in any PRWW employee benefit or compensation plan or arrangement. You further
confirm that, as of March 1, 2001, no sums or obligations are owed to you by
PRWW (including without limitation severance), except for (a) salary accrued
through February 28, 2001, (b) expenses incurred through February 28, 2001 which
in accordance with PRWW's standard policies are subject to reimbursement and (c)
the obligations of PRWW under the consulting agreement between your professional
corporation and PRWW.

         3. This will further confirm that, since you are continuing as a member
and Chairman of the Board of Directors, your outstanding stock options will not
terminate solely due to the fact that you are no longer an employee of PRWW, but
instead will continue indefinitely until the earlier of the stated termination
date of the option or three months following the date that you cease to be a
member of the Board of Directors.

         Please confirm your agreement with the foregoing by countersigning this
letter below.

                                                        Very truly yours,
                                                        PRWW, Ltd.

                                                  By: /s/ Bruce Johnson
                                                      -------------------------
                                                        Bruce Johnson
                                                        Senior Vice President
The foregoing is accepted and agreed to:

/s/ Joel Morganroth
--------------------------------------------
Joel Morganroth, M.D.
[Cite as Langshaw v. N. Royalton, 2021-Ohio-3534.]

{¶1} On June 15, 2021, a Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation 

in this public-records case. The Special Master recommends a finding by the Court that 

Requester has not shown that Respondent violated R.C. 149.43(B) and an assessment 

of costs to Requester. 

{¶2} Neither party has filed timely written objections to the Report and 

Recommendation, as permitted by R.C. 2743.75(F)(2).1 Pursuant to R.C. 

2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects to a special master’s report and 

recommendation, then this Court is required to “promptly issue a final order adopting the 

report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other 

defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” 

{¶3} The Court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on 

the face of the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation of June 15, 2021. The 

1 Requester—a self-represented litigant—has failed to notify the Court of a change of address 

because a mailing from the Court, which contained a copy of the Special Master’s Report and 

Recommendation, was returned to the Court by the United States Postal Service with the following 

notation: “Return To Sender[,] Unclaimed[,] Unable To Forward.” (Docket Entry, 8/20/2021.) The Tenth 

District Court of Appeals has stated, “Ohio courts have held that pro se litigants have the same duty as 

counsel to keep the trial court apprised of a change of address.” Investors REIT One v. Fortman, 10th 

Dist. Franklin No. 00AP-195, 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 6267, at *14 (Jan. 16, 2000). Here, Requester 

ostensibly has failed to fulfil his duty to keep the Court apprised of a change of address. 

 

DANIEL R. LANGSHAW 

 Requester 

 v. 

CITY OF NORTH ROYALTON 

 Respondent 

Case No. 2021-00070PQ 

Judge Patrick E. Sheeran 

JUDGMENT ENTRY 
Case No. 2021-00070PQ -2- ENTRY 

Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Judgment is rendered in favor of 

Respondent. Court costs are assessed to Requester. The Clerk shall serve upon all 

parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. 

 

 PATRICK E. SHEERAN 

Judge 

 

Filed September 21, 2021 

Sent to S.C. Reporter 10/1/21
#### In the Matter of Michael James Neary, an Attorney.

[52 NYS3d 242]

Per Curiam.

Michael James Neary was admitted to practice by this Court in 2010 and lists a business address in Gwynn Oak, Maryland with the Office of Court Administration. Neary now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department advises that it does not oppose Neary’s application.

Upon reading the affidavit of Neary sworn to November 4, 2016, and upon reading the correspondence in response by the Chief Attorney for the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined that Neary is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant his application and accept his resignation.

Peters, P.J., Garry, Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that Michael James Neary’s application for permis*1539sion to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further ordered that Michael James Neary’s name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court *(see generally*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]); and it is further ordered that, effective immediately, Michael James Neary is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Neary is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further ordered that Michael James Neary shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Allen Dodge, Chief Financial Officer of Health Grades, Inc., certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this amendment on Form 10-K/A to the annual report on Form 10-K of HealthGrades, Inc.; and
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.        Date: May 2, 2005 By:  /s/ Allen Dodge    Name:  Allen Dodge    Title:  Chief Financial officer
Exhibit 15.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-13784 and 333-139512) pertaining to employees’ stock option plans of Elbit Systems Ltd. of our reports dated March 14, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Elbit Systems Ltd. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Elbit Systems Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010.





By:
/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & KasiererKost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer

A member of Ernst & Young Global





Tel-Aviv, Israel, March 14, 2011
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathaniel Willis, Jr., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[768 NYS2d 898]

Appeal from a judgment of Ontario County Court (Doran, J.j, entered July 9, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [4]), aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [3] [a]), driving while intoxicated (§ 1192 [3]) and criminal mischief in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 145.00 [3]). In appeal No. 2, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (§ 175.35) and attempted welfare fraud in the fifth degree (§§ 110.00, 158.05). We reject the contention of defendant, common to both appeals, that his waivers of the right to appeal are ineffective because they were not in writing. Whether the waivers of appeal were reduced to writing is only one factor to be considered in determining whether they were knowing, intelligent, and voluntary *(see People v Robinson,*188 AD2d 622, 623 [1992]). In this case, defendant acknowledged that he was waiving his right to appeal on three separate occasions during the joint plea colloquy. On one of those occasions, County Court specifically advised defen*1323dant that he had the right to appeal both judgments of conviction to a higher court, and further advised defendant that his waivers of the right to appeal would prohibit him from doing so. Defendant acknowledged the court’s advisements, and proceeded to waive his right to appeal. Under the circumstances, we conclude that defendant’s waivers were knowing, intelligent and voluntary. None of the remaining contentions of defendant survives his waivers of the right to appeal *(see People v Meeks,*270 AD2d 859 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 837 [2000]; *People v Simms,*269 AD2d 788 [2000], *lv denied*94 NY2d 952 [2000]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Gorski, JJ.
#### Com. v. Massey

11/16/2015

255 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1149
# Demil training a success in New Zealand

/ Published April 25, 2019
DEVONPORT NAVAL BASE, New Zealand, 
DLA’s Pacific region disposition pros made the journey to remote New Zealand in early April to help train New Zealand Defence Force personnel on demilitarization technique and policy.

Pearl Harbor-based Operations Director Jon Mitsuyasu and Operations Specialist Johnny Lee spent a few days with engineers and equipment experts at Devonport Naval Base in Auckland, where they observed and instructed during demilitarization of a fire control system used aboard naval ships. They also worked with NZDF staff on development of a draft demil surveillance plan and standard operating procedures for similar equipment demilitarization needs set to take place during upcoming fleet frigate re-fittings in Canada in May.

“What impressed me the most was the dedication they showed toward developing a demil program to match or rival ours one day,” said Lee. He added that the trainees had constant questions, shared their concerns and wanted to closely examine how the U.S. military handles demilitarization. He said it showed that they were “trying to mirror our methods as closely as possible.”

Lee said the group toured local scrap facilities and discussed how the NZDF could potentially minimize its demil costs through residue sales. Lee and Mitsuyasu also counseled personnel on proper demil coding, certificate completion, and understanding certifier/verifier responsibilities.

Chris Calvert directs disposal operations for New Zealand’s naval fleet. He recently sent a letter expressing thanks to the U.S. embassy, U.S. INDO-PACOM and DLA Disposition Services and he reported that all of the NZDF’s hoped-for training goals were met.

“The NZDF is highly appreciative of [Jon] and [Johnny’s] assistance in the task,” Calvert wrote. “Over a five-day period, they provided accurate and valuable teaching, and very practical advice over a number of training exercises. ... I believe that both NZDF and DLA gained a great deal from the interaction and I am sure we will reach out to DLA again in the future.” 

New Zealand is about the size of Colorado, with the approximate population of Kentucky. The UN-member nation was declared independent from England shortly after WWII and its military has served alongside U.S. warfighters during the Korean War, the Gulf War and in Afghanistan. The trip marked the third time in the past five years that DLA Disposition Services personnel provided training there, and the first time in a hands-on, non-classroom setting.
# DLA Energy deputy commander visits Troop Support leaders

/ Published Feb. 20, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support senior leaders welcomed DLA Energy Deputy Commander W. Eric Smith to educate him on the organization’s mission Feb. 19 in Philadelphia.

DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Gavin Lawrence and supply chain leaders met with Smith to raise awareness about the organization’s mission as well as its support to the military services and its whole of government partners.

Located at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, DLA Energy provides the Department of Defense and other government agencies with comprehensive energy solutions in the most effective and efficient manner possible, according to its website.
No. 09-10794.

#### Marcus Tyrone Hightower, Petitioner v. Michigan.

562 U.S. 852, 131 S. Ct. 110,

178 L. Ed. 2d 68,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5848.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
*October 30,*2017

2017-Ohio-8341.]

2017-0009.

#### South-Western City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2016-163 and 2016-176. On joint motion to remand. Motion granted. The cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to take further action as appropriate.
#### Bogdan Cristescu, Appellant, v John Gasparis et al., Respondents.

[47 NYS3d 738]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), dated November 20, 2015, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when he awoke in his apartment to find that his living room was on fire and he was forced to run through the flames to exit through the front door of the apartment. The plaintiff commenced this action against the owners of the building, alleging that they were negligent in failing to install a smoke detector in the apartment. The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, arguing that there was a smoke detector inside the apartment, and, in any event, that the plaintiff failed to offer any evidence that the alleged failure to install a smoke detector proximately caused his injuries. The Supreme Court granted the defendants’ motion.

In support of their motion, the defendants submitted contradictory evidence as to whether a smoke detector was installed in the plaintiff’s apartment, and thus failed to eliminate questions of fact as to that issue *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *Castlepoint Ins. Co. v Command Sec. Corp.,*144 AD3d 731 [2016]; *Taylor v New York City Hous. Auth.,*116 AD3d 695 [2014]). Additionally, the defendants failed to establish, prima facie, that the absence of a smoke detector was not a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries, since, with respect to this issue, they merely pointed *670to gaps in the plaintiff’s case *(see Savekina v New York City Tr. Auth.,*131 AD3d 1156 [2015]; *Taylor v New York City Hous. Auth.,*116 AD3d 695 [2014]; *Pierre-Louis v DeLonghi Am., Inc.,*66 AD3d 857, 859 [2009]).

Since the defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, we need not consider the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s opposition papers *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d at 324).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Leventhal, J.P., Roman, Sgroi and Connolly, JJ., concur.