alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA launches 60th anniversary celebration

/ Published Sept. 1, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency is launching its diamond anniversary celebration Sept. 1 to mark the agency’s 60th year of logistics support.

The agency was created Oct. 1, 1961, to provide effective and efficient logistics support for the services at the lowest cost to taxpayers. 

“DLA has kept that promise for six decades while keeping pace with every global challenge,” DLA Chief of Staff Eric Smith said in a message to the workforce announcing the launch. 

“In every era, DLA has been fueled by a world-class workforce – a team proud to serve our warfighters and our nation with unparalleled dedication and professionalism,” he continued. 

The celebration’s theme is Forged in History, Focused on the Future, a slogan created by Kay Teagle, an automotive mechanic at DLA Installation Management Richmond, Virginia. 

Employees can learn more about how the agency’s organizational structure and mission have evolved at a special 60th anniversary webpage available now through 2022. The page features news stories, personality profiles, photos, videos, quizzes and infographics, and will be continually updated with new content. 

A playlist of numerous videos highlighting DLA’s history is also available at the Defense Visual Information Service website. Videos will showcase long-time DLA employees and an interview with William McNamara, son of DLA’s first director, Army Lt. Gen. Andrew T. McNamara.

Additional content will be posted to DLA’s Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn pages with the official hashtag #DLA60thAnniversary.

DLA Historian Colin Williams has also written a 70-page book that chronicles the agency’s support to the military services and how it’s leveraged time-proven capabilities to support other federal agencies during crises such as hurricanes and floods.

Employees are also encouraged to submit photos and videos of themselves celebrating DLA’s anniversary for possible use on DLA’s Facebook page at interact@dla.mil.
#### Cohen v Affordable Inflatables & Party Rentals, Inc.

2d Dept: 140 AD3d 731 (Action No. 5)

denied
Exhibit 15.19






CONSENT




We hereby consent to the reference to our “valuation of Series 1 Convertible Debentures of Elbit Imaging Ltd.” as of December 31, 2009, in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2009 and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd. and in the Shelf Prospectus filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd. with the Israeli Securities Authority and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange on July 21, 2009.




This consent is not to be construed as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to be filed with the Annual Report under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.




/s/Giza Zinger Even

Giza Zinger Even




Tel Aviv, Israel


May 9, 2010
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Carl A. Lucia, Deceased. Craig J. Lucia, Respondent; Barbara Lucia, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 351]

In a proceeding to settle the account of the executor, Craig J. Lucia, the objectant, Barbara Lucia, appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Riordan, S.), dated November 22, 2002, as granted those branches of the executor’s motion which were for summary judgment dismissing objection nos. 1, 2, 6, and 7.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the appellant personally.

In response to the appellant’s objections to the accounting, the executor made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, offering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issue of fact as to whether the testator revoked the testamentary disposition of shares in a closely-held corporation by entering into an agreement to sell the shares back to the corporation *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]; *Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *see also*EPTL 3-4.2; *Matter of Call,*65 Misc 2d 751 [1970]; *Matter of Jakubowicz,*71 Misc 2d 840 [1972]; *cf. Matter of Powers,*166 AD2d 534 [1990]). In opposition, the appellant failed to establish the existence of a triable issue of fact *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Luciano, J.P., Schmidt, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
164 A.3d 400

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PETER LEONCE, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 16, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
# DLA expanding use of DOD advanced analytics tool

/ Published June 17, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency Chief Data and Analytics Office hosted Advana/DLA Day June 9 to discuss the data platform’s capabilities and security features.

DLA senior leaders attended along with representatives from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, OUSD Comptroller, Joint Staff, U.S. Transportation Command and Advana. 

Advana, a mashup of the words “Advancing Analytics,” is a Defense Department platform that pulls data from hundreds of business systems to make it discoverable, understandable, and usable for advanced analytics. The platform organizes data and depicts it in filterable dashboards. It also provides decision makers and analysts access to enterprise data and structured analytics in a scalable, reliable, and secure environment. 

DLA is working to expand its use of Advana to make data-driven business decisions.

“We want to ensure that DLA is both a good teammate and consumer of data but also a contributor to the overall data landscape,” DLA Deputy Director Brad Bunn said.  

Expanded use of the Advana platform supports the department’s goal to become a data-centric organization.

Greg Little, OUSD Deputy Comptroller for Enterprise Data and Business Performance, underscored the importance of a shared approach to using the platform, emphasizing how Advana combines data from multiple functional areas and organizations to provide leaders with the whole picture.

“We want to see all of the dots connected within that picture and that’s really what we’re trying to achieve with Advana,” Little said.

Logisticians from Transcom, the Joint Staff and other organizations provided Advana demonstrations. Attendees also discussed opportunities to leverage DLA’s data along with external data from vendors and other federal agencies.

DLA Chief Data and Analytics Officer Lindsey Saul urged agency senior leaders to consider future use of the Advana platform and how it will affect DLA’s data architecture.

“The questions [we need to answer in DLA] are what is the universe of data that we need and what data do we want to bring in externally? What type of analytics do we want to do? These questions will drive decisions for our to-be data architecture,” Saul said.
#### Dietz ex rel. Dietz v. W.C.A.B. (Lower Bucks County Joint Mun. Authority)

03/30/2016

777 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 126 A.3d 1025
#### Matter of D.S. & B.A.S.W., YINC

DA 17-0053

06/27/17

2017 MT 158N

Affirmed

Dist. 4 (Missoula)
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
I, Rose Frawert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mid-State Raceway, Inc.
and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: January 10, 2004
/s/ Rose Frawert
Rose Frawert
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


                                       14
#### Green, Matter of, v Chappius

3d Dept: 147 AD3d 1129

denied
No. 09-11316.

#### Mario Weicks, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 873, 131 S. Ct. 177,

178 L. Ed. 2d 106,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6897.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 362 Fed. Appx. 844.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.71

                     Call Option Agreement-Participation Letter of Fuzhou Fukesi

                   ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER FOR PARTICIPATION OF
                              CALL OPTION AGREEMENT

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD., (registered address: Room 1003 F,
No.1027, Changning Road, Changning District, Shanghai) (hereinafter the
"PARTICIPATING SHAREHOLDER"), and FUZHOU FUKESI ADVERTISING CO., LTD.
(registered address: Xinduhui Garden Plaza, No. 171 Wuyi Road (N), Gulou
District, Fuzhou) (hereinafter the "NEW TARGET COMPANY"), as independent party,
hereby agree to participate in the Shareholders' Voting Rights Call Option
Agreement among Focus Media Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "FOCUS
MEDIA TECHNOLOGY"), Shanghai Focus Media Advertisement Co., Ltd. and other
relevant parties (hereinafter the "CALL OPTION AGREEMENT") dated March 28 2005.
The Participating Shareholder hereby grant Focus Media Technology with an
irrevocable equity Call Option (hereinafter "CALL OPTION") in respect to 70% of
the equity share of the New Target Company (hereinafter "NEWLY INCREASED EQUITY
SHARE") held by the Participating Shareholder. Once this Acknowledgement Letter
is executed by the Participating Shareholder and the New Target Company, the New
Target Company and the Newly Increased Equity Share shall be deemed to be the
"Target Company" and "Option Equity" defined under the Call Option Agreement,
and the Participating Shareholder and the New Target Company shall be deemed to
have made the same undertakings and warranties related to the New Target Company
and Option Equity with those of the Shareholders and Target Companies under the
Call Option Agreement have made related to "Target Company" and "Option Equity"
(to the extent that is related and applicable to the Participating Shareholder
and the Participated Target Company), and acknowledged and agreed to
respectively perform the same obligations in the Call Option Agreement (to the
extent that is related and applicable to the Participating Shareholder and the
Participated Target Company).

<PAGE>

                     Call Option Agreement-Participation Letter of Fuzhou Fukesi

                                [EXECUTION PAGE]

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERISEMENT CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              ---------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006

FUZHOU FUKESI ADVERTISING CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              ---------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006

FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              ---------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006
No. 09-11026.

#### Gary Roberts, Petitioner v. Richard M. Gerry, Warden.

562 U.S. 859, 131 S. Ct. 133,

178 L. Ed. 2d 80,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6396.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
No. 09-11400.

#### Todd A. Zommer, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 878, 131 S. Ct. 192,

178 L. Ed. 2d 115,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7038.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 31 So. 3d 733.
#### Verlene Gause, Respondent, v 2405 Marion Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[61 NYS3d 473]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered April 10, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs motion for a default judgment as against defendant 2405 Marion Corp. (Marion), and denied Marion’s cross motion to dismiss the action as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c), unanimously modified, on the law, to deny plaintiffs motion, and to grant Marion’s cross motion solely to the extent of permitting Marion to file a late answer within 30 days from service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in finding that plaintiff had made a sufficient showing of law office failure to excuse its failure to move for a default judgment within one year *(see Riccardi v Otero,*33 AD3d 571 [1st Dept 2006]). However, as the record reflects that Marion promptly responded to correspondence from plaintiff and sought to investigate the claim, and there being reason to believe that it did not receive the summons and complaint, we believe that Marion should be permitted to file a late answer.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Andrias and Kapnick, JJ.

The Decision and Order of this Court entered herein on March 22, 2016 (137 AD3d 598 [2016]) is hereby recalled and vacated *(see*2017 NY Slip Op 88002 [U] [2017] [decided simultaneously herewith]).
No. 09-10470.

#### Daryl Steven Carr, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 844, 131 S. Ct. 82,

178 L. Ed. 2d 53,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5910.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 592 F.3d 636.
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

     I, Oscar von Chrismar, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Banco Santander-Chile;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules *13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)*) for the company and have:

> 
      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material    information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986 

      (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the    disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report    that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

> 
      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to    adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
**EXHIBIT 12-1**
CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 and 15d-14
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Jeff Qian, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,2004 of Tramford International Limited (the “Registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial informationincluded in this annual report fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;  4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the Registrant and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior tothe filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and  (c) presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures basedon our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the Registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe Registrant’s internal controls; and
 

 

 6. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.
Date: June 30, 2005       /s/ Jeff Qian    Name: Jeff Qian
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent Medina, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 289]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered July 16, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
# DLA Distribution leadership signs sexual assault prevention proclamation

/ Published April 1, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Keith D. Reventlow, Commander Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, and Perry Knight, Senior Executive Service, Deputy Commander DLA Distribution, sign a proclamation affirming the work force commitment to a safe environment free from any form of sexual assault.