alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fort Meade disposal specialist recalls protective suit transfer to FEMA

/ Published Feb. 23, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Early in pandemic, Defense Logistics Agency employees facilitated the transfer of Tyvek protective suits from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

                Fort Meade-based Property Disposal Specialist Angela Sakryd visits the Pentagon’s media center to help officials prepare for a large-scale remodeling project.                            Fort Meade-based Property Disposal Specialist Angela Sakryd                            Fort Meade-based Property Disposal Specialist Angela Sakryd visits the Pentagon’s media center to help officials prepare for a large-scale remodeling project.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA courtesy photoVIRIN: 200915-D-D0441-1234A key contributor to that effort was Fort Meade, Maryland-based Property Disposal Specialist Angela M. Sakryd, who has spent a dozen years with DLA Disposition Services, including deployments to Afghanistan and Kuwait and a year in Japan. Sakryd recently shared her recollections of DLA’s role distributing excess material to support the federal COVID-19 response.

“This was during the initial phase of lockdown and all supplies were severely limited,” Sakryd said. “FEMA intended to distribute [suits] to those that needed them.”

Sakryd worked with property disposal specialists Kelly Clabbers and Carol Fix to coordinate the transfers and said DLA already had a solid relationship with DTRA from previous receipt-in-place projects.

“I forwarded the receipt-in-place memorandum of understanding and they were able to get everything digitally signed and returned so that we could get the property on record,” she said.

Although pandemic restrictions made it impossible for Sakryd to inspect the items, which were located in Springfield, Virginia, the suits were already palletized and ready for shipment.

“The generator’s main concern was that these would be shipped to one customer to minimize their own requirements to be on-site during the period of max telework and weather and safety leave,” she said.

In all, Sakryd and her colleagues helped guide nearly 40,000 protective suits to first responders from DTRA’s excess stock.

“Just because the world locked down, our customers still had disposition needs and throughout this craziness, a lot of people showed up to make it happen,” Sakryd said. “I am glad that I was able to adapt to the new battle rhythm on the home front and also contribute to making sure property got to the right people at the right time.”
# Mandatory LMS training addresses extremism

/ Published March 26, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency civilians and service members are being asked to rededicate themselves to the oath they took upon entering public service in new mandatory training that addresses extremist and dissident ideologies within the Defense Department.

“Upholding Our Constitution: DLA Extremism Stand-Down” has been assigned to employees’ learning plans in the Learning Management System and was created in response to a Feb. 5 memorandum from Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III ordering DOD-wide attention to extremism in the ranks. Employees have until April 30 to complete the training.  

In opening remarks, DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic describes racism, bigotry and white supremacy as uncomfortable topics that must be addressed because they undermine DLA’s inclusive culture. 

“We value our diverse workforce and welcome a multitude of opinions and ideas. Conversely, we denounce destructive ideologies that encourage discrimination, hate or harassment against others,” she says in the video. She encourages employees to help each other listen and share ideas. 

The training features a presentation on extremism and its dangers using examples and images as well as information on employees’ responsibility to report extremism with instruction on reporting procedures. Remarks are also included by the secretary of defense, DLA Senior Enlisted Leader Army Command Sgt. Major Tomeka O’Neal and Vice Director Brad Bunn, who notes in the training that he first took the oath over 30 years ago when he was appointed as a summer clerk for the National Park Service in Washington, D.C. 

“Because we each took an oath to uphold the law, support and defend the Constitution, and to do our jobs to the best of our ability, all military service members and public servants are expected to be guided in their actions by a strong moral compass,” Bunn says, alluding to values like integrity, ethics, honor, courage and loyalty. 

The training supports what Austin described in his memo as the first step of what he believes must be a concerted effort to better educate employees on the scope of extremism and to develop ways to eliminate corrosive effects that extremist ideology and conduct have on the workforce. 

DOD Instruction 1325.06, “Handling Dissident and Protest Activities Among Members of the Armed Forces,” prohibits military members from actively advocating for and participating in supremacist, extremist or criminal gang doctrine, ideology or causes. The oaths taken by civil servants and service members have minor differences but common threads. 

The DLA training concludes with a voluntary survey, and results will be distributed to leaders by major subordinate command and directorate.
#### CPS 227 LLC v Brody

Sup Ct, NY County, 10/11/16 (135 AD3d 607)

denied
Exhibit 31.2.  CERTIFICATION   I, S. E. Parks, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Questar Gas Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    May 7, 2008 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
================================================================================


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Annual Report of Terra  Systems,  Inc., on Form
10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2003, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  Mark  Faerber,  a
consultant  performing  certain services for the Company commonly performed by a
Chief  Financial  Officer  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date: March 30, 2006


/s/ Mark Faerber
------------------------------------------
Mark Faerber
Consultant performing certain services for the Company
commonly performed by a Chief Financial Officer

















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1529

OLIVER R. COLEMAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District 

Judge. (8:09-cv-00213-DKC)

Submitted: January 19, 2011 Decided: February 2, 2011

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oliver R. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Julia Doyle Bernhardt, 

Assistant Attorney General, Bradley Neitzel, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Oliver R. Coleman appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for 

failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Coleman v. Prince George’s County Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 

No. 8:09-cv-00213-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2010). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Keith Hershey Sheehan Benoit Dempsey & Oman, P.C. Letterhead


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                     ----------------------------------


      We consent to the use herein of our report dated November 20, 1995, as 
it pertains to the audited balance sheet of Falmouth Co-operative Bank as of 
September 30, 1995 and the related statements of income, changes in 
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and its inclusion
in the amended Form 10-KSB of Falmouth Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended 
September 30, 1997.



/s/ KEITH HERSEY SHEEHAN BENOIT DEMPSEY & OMAN, P.C.
February 18, 1998
#### People v Tatner

4th Dept: 149 AD3d 1595

denied
#### In the Matter of Laura J. Manfredonia, Respondent, v George J. Scivolette, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 1248]

Appeal by George J. Scivolette from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Christine R Krahulik, J.), dated December 23, 2015. The order denied his post-dispositional motion to dismiss the petitioner’s family offense petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Family Court did not err in denying his post-dispositional motion to dismiss the family offense petition. Among other things, the court found that the affidavit of service was improperly executed *(see*CPLR 306, 2214 [b]), and there was no evidence that service was in fact properly made upon the petitioner, who did not respond to the motion *(cf. Matter of Tanash v Amien,*82 AD3d 1252 [2011]; *Mendez v Kyung Yoo,*23 AD3d 354, 356 [2005]; *Mariano v Steinberg,*87 AD2d 606 [1982]).

Hall, J.P., Miller, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2141

To provide for a grant program to award grants to certain rural communities

that provide emergency medical services for Federal-aid highways, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 19 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Mr. BINGAMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To provide for a grant program to award grants to certain

rural communities that provide emergency medical services for Federal-aid highways, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

4 As used in this Act:

5 (1) COMMUNITY.—The term ‘‘community’’

6 means an incorporated or unincorporated town or

7 village (or equivalent municipal entity) with a popu8 lation of fewer than 10,000 individuals, as deter-
2

•S 2141 IS

1 mined by the Bureau of the Census in the census

2 conducted by the Bureau in 1990.

3 (2) FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS.—The term ‘‘Fed4 eral-aid highways’’ has the meaning provided the

5 term in section 101 of title 23, United States Code.

6 (3) RURAL COMMUNITY.—The term ‘‘rural

7 community’’ means a community that is located at

8 a distance of at least 100 miles from an urban cen9 ter.

10 (4) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means

11 the Secretary of Transportation.

12 (5) URBAN CENTER.—The term ‘‘urban center’’

13 means a municipality with a population of 500,000

14 or more individuals, as determined by the Bureau of

15 the Census in the census conducted by the Bureau

16 in 1990.

17 SEC. 2. GRANTS TO RURAL COMMUNITIES FOR EMER18 GENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.

19 (a) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the

20 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish

21 a grant program to provide grants to eligible rural commu22 nities that provide services to Federal-aid highways and

23 that submit an application that is approved by the Sec24 retary. An application submitted under this subsection

25 shall be in such form as the Secretary may prescribe.
3

•S 2141 IS

1 (b) ELIGIBLE RURAL COMMUNITY.—A rural commu2 nity that expends not less than 25 percent of the funds

3 allocated by the community for emergency medical services

4 for services provided for medical emergencies that occur

5 in the vicinity of a Federal-aid highway shall be eligible

6 to receive a grant under this section.

7 (c) ELIGIBLE COSTS.—A grant awarded under this

8 section may be used by an eligible rural community to—

9 (1) purchase ambulances and other emergency

10 medical equipment; and

11 (2) provide training to emergency medical per12 sonnel.

13 (d) AMOUNT OF GRANT.—The amount of a grant

14 awarded under this section may not exceed $20,000.

15 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

16 There are authorized to be appropriated to the De17 partment of Transportation $10,000,000 to carry out this

18 Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6530
FRANK ERVIN ALTIZER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALAN KATZ; MARY E. SHEA, Esquire; PAMELA A. SARGENT; T. P. KAGEY; BUCHANAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-241-R) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Altizer v. Katz , No. CA-96-241-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to China  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to China  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2 | Year-3  | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7  | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |         |         |        |         |        | 0      | 17,221 | 103,410 | 90,473 | 6,851 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 214,401 | 453,304 | 96,659 | 173,247 |        |        |        |         |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# Colorado Springs employee recognized 

/ Published June 2, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Material Identifier and Examiner Justin Herburger is Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Employee of the Quarter of the 2nd quarter of fiscal 2021.

Herburger has been a valued contributor to the property management branch of the Colorado Springs field activity during all three years he’s been with the agency. Supervisor Edward Martin said Herburger’s performance through pandemic challenges had remained consistently excellent.

“While other employees were taking weather and safety leave, Justin volunteered to work a number of additional shifts, and during each and every one, his positive attitude and outstanding customer service were recognized by all of the staff at Colorado Springs and mentioned by customers conducting disposal activities at our site,” Martin said. 

During each shift, Herburger helped the site exceed its anticipated receipts per employee rate, while contributing directly to an “agency-leading 40% on-the-shelf rate.” 

“Justin's attitude and spirit are instrumental in establishing and maintaining an award-winning environment and have made his contributions so worthy of the recognition associated with the Employee of the Quarter Award,” Martin said.

Herburger cited the mentorship of his site coworkers for his success with the agency.

“I love the site I work at, mainly because of the team I work with. They’re a great group and I couldn’t ask for a better bunch of coworkers and leadership team,” Herburger said. “It’s an honor and I have no one but my team and leadership to thank for it.”

Martin called him a “true team player” whose commitment to coworkers and customers both has inspired the entire staff and consistently enriched the work environment.

“I found out I was nominated when I came into work and everyone that morning was congratulating me. I didn’t know what anyone was talking about until I opened my email and saw the listing of winners,” Herburger said. “I was shocked and also very humbled by the fact that I had not only been nominated but selected.”
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|West Virginia Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|West Virginia Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 258,563 | 261,546
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 260,744 | 256,692 | 256,643 | 258,056 | 262,305 | 259,381 | 261,345 | 268,869 | 268,626 | 268,803
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 268,803 | 268,803 | 269,603 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024