alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Antonio E.B., an Infant. In the Matter of Maritza J., Appellant, v Ramona J. et al., Respondents.

[52 NYS3d 348]

Order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper), Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about July 21, 2015, to the extent it denied, after a hearing, petitioner maternal aunt’s petition for custody of the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from permanency hearing order, same court (Christopher W. Coffey, Ref.), entered on or about July 23, 2015, which determined that petitioner agency had exercised reasonable efforts to make and finalize the permanency plan of adoption, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence supports the Family Court’s order denying petitioner maternal aunt’s application to have custody of the child returned to her *(see Matter of Keith H. [Logann M.K.],*113 AD3d 555, 556-557 [1st Dept 2014]). The *541hearing demonstrated that the child has special needs that are being met by his foster mother, he is thriving in her care and he is living with his two older siblings, who had already been adopted by the foster mother *(see Matter of Ender M.Z.-P. v Administration for Children’s Servs.,*128 AD3d 713 [2d Dept 2015]). Although appellant loves the child and stopped caring for him through no fault of her own, the testimony adduced at the hearing demonstrated that she was physically incapable of providing the child with proper care after suffering an aneurism and stroke *(see Matter of Peter L.,*59 NY2d 513, 521 [1983]; *Matter of Angellynn S.H.W. [Vivian N.V.],*93 AD3d 1349, 1351 [4th Dept 2012]). The testimony also established that appellant lacked insight into the child’s special needs and lacked the parental judgment necessary to provide him with proper custody and guardianship, because she allowed people she did not know very well to live in her home and continued to allow them to stay there even after one of them began using marijuana *(see e.g. Matter of Nikole S. v Jordan W.,*123 AD3d 497 [1st Dept 2014], *lv dismissed*24 NY3d 1211 [2015], *lv denied*24 NY3d 916 [2015]).

The purported appeal from the July 23, 2015 permanency hearing order is dismissed because appellant was not a party to the termination proceeding and never sought to intervene pursuant to Family Court Act § 1035 *(see Harris v City of New York,*28 AD3d 223, 224 [1st Dept 2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 704 [2006]; *Matter of Dana XX.,*28 AD3d 1025, 1026 [3d Dept 2006]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
#### Com. v. Robinson

08/10/2016

177 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 585
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Illinois Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Illinois Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 244,900 | 252,344
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 216,132 | 215,017 | 215,594 | 291,544 | 292,544 | 291,845 | 291,845 | 250,505 | 251,845 | 251,845
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 251,845 | 251,845 | 250,505 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14962]



[[Page 30479]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 63 FR 28370.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 2 p.m., Monday, June 15, 
1998.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission 
changed the meeting to discuss adjudicatory matters to Tuesday, June 
16, 1998 at 2:30 p.m.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-14962 Filed 6-2-98; 11:20 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### Com. v. Shuler

12/08/2015

412 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 53 A.3d 927
Exhibit 99(a)

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of ALLTEL Corporation(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott T.Ford, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

          (1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Scott T. Ford

Scott T. FordChief Executive Officer and PresidentAugust 12, 2002
#### Evert v. Fletcher

OP 17-0349

06/27/17

Denied

Original Proceeding Habeas Corpus
2016-1147.

#### Ashtabula Cty. Bar Assn. v. Brown.

Sua sponte, Thomas Christopher Brown, Attorney Registration No. 0024054, last known business address in Geneva, Ohio, found in contempt for failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before January 2, 2018.
<PAGE>

                              As of December 31, 1996

Jeffrey P. Johnson
Zimmerman Sign Company
9846 Highway 31 East
Tyler, Texas 75705

RE:  First Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (as
     amended from time to time, the "LOAN AGREEMENT") between Comerica
     Bank-Texas ("LENDER") and Zimmerman Sign Company. ("BORROWER") dated
     October 31, 1996

Dear Mr. Johnson:

   Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used herein shall have
the meanings given such terms in the Loan Agreement. Effective as of the date
of this letter, Lender and Borrower agree as follows:

   1. Subparagraph "(a)" of Section 9.5 of the Agreement is amended and
      restated in its entirety as follows (with all other subparagraphs
      remaining as originally written):

      "(a) From the date of this Agreement                   $1,000,000
           through December 31, 1996

           From January 1, 1997 through March 31, 1997       $1,000,000

           From April 1, 1997 through June 30, 1997          $1,250,000

           From July 1, 1997 through September 30, 1997      $1,750,000"

   2. Subparagraphs "(a)" and "(b)" of Section 9.6 of the Agreement are
      amended and restated in their entirety as follows (with all other
      subparagraphs remaining as originally written):

      "(a) From the date of this Agreement                      4.5:1.0
           through December 31, 1996

           From January 1, 1997 through March 31, 1997          4.5:1.0

           From April 1, 1997 through June 30, 1997            3.75:1.0

           From July 1, 1997 through September 30, 1997        3.75:1.0"

<PAGE>

   The preceding modification is for the limited time and purpose herein
expressed. Such modification shall not adversely affect or impair any rights
or remedies available to Lender under the Loan Agreement, or otherwise, and
shall not constitute a waiver of any Defaults, Events of Default or other
violations of the provisions of the Agreement relating to events or time
periods not covered by this modification, and shall not imply that the Lender
will in the future grant any other waivers or modifications.

   The preceding modification shall not be effective until Lender shall have
received a copy of this letter bearing the original signatures of Borrower.
This letter may be executed in one or more counterparts, which together shall
constitute one document.

Sincerely,

/s/  DAVID TERRY
-----------------------------
David Terry
Assistant Vice President

ACKNOWLEDGED, ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO
AS OF THE DATE OF THE ABOVE LETTER:


BORROWER:

ZIMMERMAN SIGN COMPANY




By:  /s/ JEFFREY P. JOHNSON
     -----------------------------
Its: VP, CFO
     -----------------------------

                                       -2-
No. 09-1405.

#### Jeffrey Zucker, et al., Petitioners v. Robert Kennedy.

562 U.S. 832, 131 S. Ct. 110,

178 L. Ed. 2d 31,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6380.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 595 F.3d 327.
# DLA offers non-medical COVID-19 protective equipment to state, local government agencies

/ Published July 29, 2020
Fort Belvoir, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency is giving state and local government organizations a new option for purchasing non-medical personal protective equipment through the COVID-19 Contingency Corridor in FedMall, the government e-commerce platform for the military services and federal, state and local government agencies.

The corridor offers 14 supplier catalogs with over 335 items like non-medical masks and gloves, hand sanitizer, disinfectant wipes, temperature sensors and Plexi-glass shields.

“We recognize that our state and local government customers have suppliers in their areas, but this gives them another avenue for getting protective equipment that has at times been difficult to obtain during the pandemic,” said Tracy Shepherd, state and local government program manager for DLA’s Whole of Government Division.

Federal law allows state and local government agencies to buy DLA-managed supplies for use in first responder efforts supporting counter-drug, homeland security and emergency response activities. Potential users include firefighters, law enforcement officers, paramedics and public works employees. Over 30 state law enforcement agencies and over 300 state and local firefighting agencies are already enrolled in FedMall.

State and local government agencies new to FedMall should confirm their eligibility by emailing StateandLocalProgram@dla.mil with “Eligibility” in the subject line. The organization’s name, address and phone number should be included.

Once determined eligible, agencies must ensure they have a state or local government credit card and valid External Certificate Authority, similar to the certificate authority of Common Access Cards. ECAs require background checks that take roughly two weeks and cost $380 for a three-year subscription.

“After agencies have an ECA, DLA can get them up and running in FedMall usually in less than two days,” Shepherd said.

FedMall has been a key part of DLA’s COVID-19 response, and customers have ordered over $14 million in pandemic-related personal protective equipment from the platform since mid-March. Top items have included surgical and knit face masks; cleaning supplies; and Meals, Ready to Eat.

For more information, email StateandLocalProgram@dla.mil or visit www.dla.mil/Info/FedMall/StateAndLocal.
2017-1486.

#### State ex rel. Siemering v. Ghiz.

In Mandamus. On relator’s motion to take judicial notice. Motion denied. On respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Kennedy, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

French, J., dissents in part and would grant relator’s motion to take judicial notice.

O’Donnell, J., dissents and would grant relator’s motion to take judicial notice and dismiss the cause as moot.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
##### 



-53- EXHIBIT 3 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In Connection with the Annual Report of Tramford International Limited
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
we, Jiang Xin Hao and Michael Siu, respectively, Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that, to the best of our knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. June 28, 2004  
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-122579, 333-106110 and 333-47834) pertainingto the 2000 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Director Option Plan, 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and certain December 1999 Non Plan Option Agreements of Synplicity, Inc., of our reports dated March 14, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Synplicity, Inc., Synplicity, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Synplicity,Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

March 14, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kareem White, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 128]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered January 23, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Richter, J.P., Tom, Kapnick, Kern and Moulton, JJ.
Fitness Center move involves plenty of sweat, heavy lifting
 
  By Natalie Skelton, DLA Aviation Public Affairs
  The old accommodations for Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond’s Morale, Welfare and Recreation’s popular Red Brick Fitness Center weren’t making the grade. While construction of a new Fitness Center gets under way, the workout equipment will be housed in the Community Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. “MWR is moving its fitness operations into the community center since Building 33 [the longtime location for the fitness center] is set to be demolished,” William Marjenhoff, business recreation director, said. The relocation is no easy feat; approximately 60 pieces of equipment, weighing a total of 24 ,000 pounds, had to travel from Building 33 to Building 27 (the Community Center), a distance of roughly 200-300 yards. The move is still in process; staff from Installation Operations Division and MWR continue to relocate and set up the equipment. Once the move is complete, the gym will be open to all authorized DoD identification cardholders who are 14 and older. Women’s and men’s locker rooms with day-use lockers will be available for gym users. Marjenhoff said the gym’s capacity will be determined once all the equipment has been installed. Requirements for gym users to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) such as masks and gloves have not been established at this time. The new Fitness Center’s completion date is December 2020, which will be in Building 32, F and G Bays.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARK K BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 412 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of February, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Demorest,Chief Executive Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of MOCON, Inc.

 

 
| Date: August 13, 2009 |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |   |
| /s/ Robert L. Demorest     |   |
| Robert L. Demorest         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer    |   |

 

----
No. 09-1435.

#### Sae Joon Kim, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

562 U.S. 833, 131 S. Ct. 128,

178 L. Ed. 2d 34,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6474.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 757.
2017-1787.

#### State v. Williams.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-640, 2017-Ohio-5598. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
# DLA Distribution’s Holtan awarded the Superior Civilian Service Award

/ Published Sept. 14, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
For her efforts in leveraging every possible resource of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Operations to support a critical national priority mission, Mobilization Planning Specialist Elise Holtan is awarded the Super Civilian Service Award.

During a critical mission requiring alignment with U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, U. S. Northern Command and U.S. Army North, Holtan was instrumental in leveraging and coordinating the efforts and personnel of DLA Troop Support, DLA Distribution and the DLA Agency Synchronization and Operations Center. Her unwavering devotion to duty meant she supported daily meetings, even on weekends and holidays.

Her efforts ensured over 102,000 rolls of concertina wire, 4,000 rolls of barbed wire, 175,000 pickets, 60 shipping containers, 85 tents, 6,000 items of personal protective equipment, 32,000 map products, 21,985 cases of meals ready to eat, and 132,925 gallons of fuel were delivered to customers operating throughout Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and California.

By way of remote and face-to-face engagements from October 2018 through May 2019, Holtan coordinated efforts across multiple stake holders as she maintained a direct line of communication open with DLA and major subordinate commands.

In addition to her direct efforts, Holtan also trained partner organization employees in processes to track and monitor material movements to ensure that all stake holders were properly supported.

Holtan was responsible for the creation and delivery of information and updates to keep senior leaders and decision makers informed. Her reports – seen at the highest levels of DLA – made their way to briefings given at the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland Security level.

Holtan’s professional dedication and devotion to her duties reflect great credit upon herself, the Defense Logistics Agency and the Department of Defense.