alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-11082.

#### Eric T. Tolen, Petitioner v. Missouri.

562 U.S. 861, 131 S. Ct. 138,

178 L. Ed. 2d 84,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6198.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Eastern District, denied.

Same case below, 304 S.W.3d 229.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Quincy McQuaid, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 658]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered March 24, 2015, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the verdict finding him *1150guilty of robbery in the first degree but not guilty of grand larceny in the fourth degree was legally repugnant is without merit. Viewing the verdict solely in terms of the elements as charged to the jury *(see People v DeLee,*24 NY3d 603, 608 [2014]; *People v Muhammad,*17 NY3d 532, 542 [2011]; *People v Tucker,*55 NY2d 1, 6 [1981]), the acquittal on the count of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [1]) did not negate any of the elements of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]) of which the defendant was convicted *(see People v Weaver,*195 AD2d 1019, 1019 [1993]; *People v Price,*129 AD2d 745, 746 [1987]; *People v Barry,*100 AD2d 803, 804 [1984]; *People v Jackson,*69 AD2d 823, 824 [1979]).

The defendant further contends that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

Leventhal, J.P., Hinds-Radix, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 number 333-21713) and related Prospectus pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option
Plan for Officers and Key Employees and the related Prospectus pertaining to the
1996 Non-Officer Directors Stock Option Plan of PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.
and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 number 333-48377) and related
Prospectus pertaining to the 1997 Premium Priced Stock Option Plan and the
related Prospectus pertaining to the Amendment and Restatement of the PacifiCare
Health Systems, Inc. Savings and Profit-Sharing Plan of PacifiCare Health
Systems, Inc. of our report dated February 3, 2000 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of PacifiCare Health Systems,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1999.

                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Irvine, California
March 23, 2000
# DLA Troop Support’s PTC Analytical hosts tours, promotes knowledge

/ Published April 5, 2019
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Product Test Center Analytical hosted tours for DLA Headquarters counsel and junior Navy sailors April 3 in Philadelphia. The event helped educate partners and customers on the scientific testing employees do in support of the warfighter. 

During DLA HQ’s legal team tour, the guests were provided information on testing that the PTC-A does to support the agency’s efforts to eliminate Commercial and Government Entity code fraud, or CAGE compromise, a practice by which companies defraud the government by falsely representing themselves or their materiel’s quality to obtain government contracts. 

Sailors were given the opportunity to view the testing of items such as physical training uniforms and duty uniforms. PTC-A Supervisor Jamie Hieber ensured their faith in DLA Troop Support efforts to guarantee quality products for the warfighters. 

“We welcome requests for tours like these,” Hieber said. “Our lab is proud of the scientific work we do in support of the warfighter. If we can provide peace of mind to our partners and customers in the quality of materiel that supports their missions, we are happy to oblige.”
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**STATEMENT
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**




Pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Andrew
      Carr Conway, Jr., chief financial officer of Axion Power International, Inc
      (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:




The
        Company’s Form 10KSB Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Andrew
                Carr Conway, Jr.Andrew
                Carr Conway, Jr., Chief Financial OfficerDated:
                April 4, 2008
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Belgium (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Belgium (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan  | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2019                                                                                                                              |      |     | W   |     |     |     |     |     | W   |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|2022                                                                                                                              | 8.51 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 09-10959.

#### Rodney Dutch, Petitioner v. Karen Balicki, Administrator, South Woods State Prison, et al.

562 U.S. 857, 131 S. Ct. 124,

178 L. Ed. 2d 76,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6064,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Order filed, August 19, 2016

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00558

- CV

____________ FRANKLIN MARLON JERO ME AKA FRANKLIN M. J EROME , Appellant

V.

OSCAR VALLE , Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14

- DCV

- 213767



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due August 18, 2016

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been fil ed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Elizabeth Wittu , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
2017-0862.

#### State v. Miller.

Lucas App. No. L-16-1029, 2017-Ohio-670. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Kennedy, J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          18,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    368,695
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               420,334
<PP&E>                                       1,276,512
<DEPRECIATION>                               (459,348)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,243,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          212,639
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,697,607
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,759,297)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,243,934
<SALES>                                        122,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,498
<CGS>                                           22,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,953,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,854,437)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                        WESLEY JESSEN VISIONCARE, INC.

                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                   (in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                Year Ended December 31, 
                                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                          1998            1997            1996                 
                                                        --------        --------         -------               
<S>                                                     <C>             <C>              <C>                    
                                                                                                
Computation of basic net income (loss) per share:                                               
                                                                                                
Net income (loss)                                       $ 29,597        $  3,298        $ (2,742)              
                                                        ========        ========        ========               
Weighted average common shares outstanding                17,432          16,898          14,638                             
Basic net income (loss) per share                       $   1.70        $   0.20        $  (0.19)              
                                                        ========        ========        ========               
                                                                                                
Computation of diluted net income (loss) per share:                                             
                                                                                                
Net income (loss)                                       $ 29,597        $  3,298        $ (2,742)              
                                                        ========        ========        ========               
Weighted average common shares outstanding                17,432          16,898          14,638               
Net additional shares issuable in connection with                                               
  stock options pursuant to the treasury stock method      1,472           1,553               -               
                                                        --------        --------        --------               
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding        18,904          18,451          14,638               
                                                        ========        ========        ========               
Diluted net income (loss) per share                     $   1.57        $   0.18        $  (0.19)              
                                                        ========        ========        ========               
</TABLE>
CAAP-11-0000547

#### Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n v. Gacula

Affirmed
# Call center agents, warehouse workers rush equipment orders for firefighters

/ Published Aug. 27, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Call center agents and warehouse workers at the Defense Logistics Agency are working 24/7 to connect firefighters with emergency supplies needed to put out wildfires sprawling across millions of acres in California, Arizona, Colorado, Montana and other states. 

Customer Interaction Center agents have handled over 610 emergency orders so far this fire season for items ranging from chainsaws and fire hoses to hardhats staged at DLA Distribution San Joaquin in Tracy, California, where workers pack and ship items for one-day turnaround. The agency has provided over $10 million in support in just the past two weeks compared to $7.3 million during the 2019 fire season.

“We anticipate at least three more weeks of severe weather activity and a significant competition for resources as most geographic areas have increased fire activity,” said Jeff Crosson, DLA’s customer account manager for the U.S. Forest Service. On the weekend of Aug. 21, CIC agents and warehouse workers processed four emergency orders for 105 items. One order called for 7,000 radio batteries, said Megan Krueger-Youmans, a CIC customer support specialist.

“Every time the firefighters go out into the field and come back, they replace their batteries even if they only used them for an hour because they don’t want to go back out and not have communication,” she said. COVID-19 has put an additional strain on equipment this year since firefighters can’t share personal protective equipment such as helmets, she added.

Firefighters typically place emergency orders in DLA’s Gatekeeper email system, then follow up with a phone call to CIC agents, who alert DDJC on the order number, line items and quantity requested before finalizing the order in DLA’s Distribution Standard System. Agents also ensure items are in stock and not blocked for release. 

“If we’re low on a certain item and can’t fill the whole order, the CIC agents let the customer know we can send them what we have for now and send the rest as we get them in,” Krueger-Youmans said. 

She and another customer support specialist worked until 3 a.m. Aug. 25 rushing orders for boots needed by National Guard troops soon deploying to assist firefighters and first responders. 

“It’s rewarding to help get these emergency orders moving, and every time you see reports on the news about the fires, you wish you could do more,” she added.

According to an Aug. 22 USA Today article, 600 wildfires burned over a million acres in just one week this month in California.

DLA began working with officials from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildland Fire Protection Program and U.S. Forest Service in 2016 to determine the types and quantities of items to pre-stock in DLA warehouses for wildfires across the nation. The agency manages 295 wildland firefighting items.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Argentina (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Argentina (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr  | May   | Jun | Jul  | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | ----- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | W    | W     | W   | W    | W   |     |     |     |    
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |      | 11.06 |     |      |     |     |     |     |    
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | 5.59 | 5.75  | W   | 5.91 |     |     |     |     |    
|2024                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | 5.11 | 5.16  |     |      |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
*October 11, 2017*

2017-Ohio-8136.]

2016-0615.

#### State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.

In Mandamus. Sua sponte, an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05: parties shall file any *1450evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Kent State University shall file, under seal, copies of the unredacted documents at issue in this case at the time of the filing of the evidence.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss is denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.