alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Susquehanna’s Child Development Center celebrates Month of the Military Child

/ Published April 29, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
The Defense Logistics Agency Susquehanna Child and Youth Program hosted a special Month of the Military Child performance and parade April 1 on Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania.

Kicking off the month-long celebration, the event started with special opening presentations from children that are a part of the Child and Youth Program. Following the presentations, the children and their parents walked a parade route around the Child Development Center. Military and civilian personnel on the installation were invited to accompany the children to cheer and show support for military children around the globe.

Approximately 1.6 million children in the United States have a military parent, and April is designated as the Month of the Military Child, highlighting the important role military children play in the armed forces community. Dana Spalding, the chief of Family & Morale, Welfare and Recreation at DLA Installation Management Susquehanna, believes that celebrating this month is imperative.

“My husband and I have served more than forty years of combined military service, serving in the Army and Navy while raising our three daughters,” she said. “I can tell you by personal experience that they have endured many sacrifices. Take the time this month and join me in celebrating the bravery and courage our military children have endured and remind them all that we as a community recognize their sacrifices.”
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15010]



[[Page 30745]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6105-1]


National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and 
Technology; Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The charter for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 
National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology 
(NACEPT) will be renewed for an additional two-year period as a 
necessary committee that is in the public's interest, and in accordance 
with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 
U.S.C. appl.2 section 9(c). The purpose of NACEPT is to provide advice 
and counsel to the Administrator of EPA on issues associated with 
environmental management and policy. It is determined that NACEPT is in 
the public's interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed on the Agency by law.
    Inquiries may be directed to Gwendolyn Whitt, Designated Federal 
Officer, NACEPT, U.S. EPA (1601-F), 401 M Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 
20460.

    Dated: May 8, 1998.
Gwendolyn Whitt,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-15010 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# DLA CFC off to strong start in the national capital area

/ Published Nov. 18, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency employees in the national capital area are almost 35% toward reaching their 2021 Combined Federal Campaign goal of $300,000. By Nov. 17, employees had pledged over $105,000 and 74 volunteer hours with eight weeks remaining in what is known as the world’s largest, most successful workplace charity campaign.

“Employees are making a difference by contributing their money and time to charities that assist families and children in our own communities across the nation and even around the world,” said Jada Fairrow, DLA CFC campaign manager.

DLA Energy is leading donations with almost $24,000. DLA Information Operations and DLA Logistics Operations are in second and third place with just over $15,000 each.

DLA’s goal increased from its 2020 target of $260,000 after employees exceeded it by over $45,000.

“When CFC challenged us to raise our goal this year, the director took it on knowing we’d given that much before even with mass telework and personal hardships of COVID-19,” Fairrow said. “DLA employees have a long history of helping others in spite of challenges.”

Keyworkers are planning several events to help employees learn more about CFC charities and inspire them to give. A charity panel is scheduled to take place via WebRTC Nov. 30 and will feature at least half a dozen charities. Recurring “Tuesday talks” also available via WebRTC feature employees sharing details about causes of the week and personal stories about why they believe in supporting charities close to their hearts.

“I believe at some point we’re all engaged with giving, whether it’s for a family member or friend who’s in need. Statistics show us there are always people around us who lack basic things like food and even shelter,” Fairrow added.

This is Fairrow’s first time leading CFC but she’s been giving since she joined the Navy in 1989.

“As a Navy vet, I’ve always known about CFC. A lot of military programs are synched with the campaign, so I’ve also been able to see how our donations enable charities to provide the support they do,” she continued.

Donors can support causes ranging from homeless veterans and endangered species to cancer research. Since it began in 1961, federal employees have raised over $8.5 billion. 

Employees can donate by credit card or payroll deduction on a one-time or recurring basis at GiveCFC.org or the CFC Giving Mobile App on their cell phone. Both options are secure and allow users to search for specific charities or view a list of organizations that support specific categories by location. A hand icon appears next to charities needing volunteers.

Each week throughout the campaign will be dedicated to raising awareness for causes like ending hunger, environmental protection and human rights. For more information about donating or attending virtual CFC events, contact a keyworker in your directorate.
#### Com. v. Holmes

11/03/2015

450 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1138
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S.$

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                          1
<CASH>                               1,444
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       26,138
<ALLOWANCES>                        15,720
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    13,124
<PP&E>                               4,131
<DEPRECIATION>                       2,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      16,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                5,486
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                11
<OTHER-SE>                           4,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        16,013
<SALES>                              4,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     4,392
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        6,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (2,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                          (506)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (1,771)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        (1,771)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.14)


</TABLE>
No. 09-10783.

#### Michael John Fletcher, Petitioner v. Kenneth T. McKee, Warden.

562 U.S. 852, 131 S. Ct. 108,

178 L. Ed. 2d 67,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6237.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 355 Fed. Appx. 935.
No. 12-8384.

#### Ashmore *v.*Ashmore.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
No. 09-11347.

#### Sylvester Leon Little, Petitioner v. North Carolina.

562 U.S. 875, 131 S. Ct. 183,

178 L. Ed. 2d 109,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6690.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of North Carolina, Anson County, denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Hall, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 295]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J.), rendered February 19, 2014, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 12 years to life, unanimously modified, on the law, to the *622extent of vacating the persistent violent felony offender, adjudication only with respect to the weapon possession conviction, and remanding for resentencing on that conviction as a second felony offender, and otherwise affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations, including its evaluation of the victim’s explanation for initially giving false accounts of the incident.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion *(see People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203 [2002]; *People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]; *People v Pavao,*59 NY2d 282, 292 [1983]). Defendant’s theft-related convictions were highly relevant to his credibility. Defendant’s *Sandoval*motion preserved a challenge to the court’s substantive ruling, but failed to preserve defendant’s present procedural arguments concerning the court’s determination of the motion, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find these procedural claims to be unsupported by a fair reading of the record, and unavailing.

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s CPL 210.40 motion to dismiss the charges in furtherance of justice. After considering the statutory factors in totality, we find no “compelling factor” (CPL 210.40 [1]) that would warrant that “extraordinary remedy” *(People v Moye,*302 AD2d 610, 611 [2d Dept 2003]), “which we have cautioned should be exercised sparingly” *(People v Keith R.,*95 AD3d 65, 67 [1st Dept 2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 963 [2012] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see also People v Marshall,*106 AD3d 1, 11 [1st Dept 2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 1006 [2013]).

As the People concede, defendant’s present conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree was under a subdivision (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]) not constituting a violent felony (Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [c]). Accordingly, defendant could not be sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender on that conviction. The parties agree that the matter should be remanded for resentencing on that conviction.

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sekou Shutsha, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 850]

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J., at suppression hearing; James M. *658Burke, J., at jury trial and sentencing), rendered June 10, 2015, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 to 7 years, held in abeyance, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court for a new suppression hearing.

The existing, unexpanded record is sufficient to establish that defendant received ineffective assistance when his trial counsel failed to argue at the suppression hearing that there were no exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless search of defendant’s bag incident to his arrest. There was no reasonable strategic basis for defense counsel’s failure to challenge the search of the bag on the ground of lack of exigency, and defendant has presented substantial arguments for suppression on that ground *(see People v Clermont,*22 NY3d 931 [2013]).

However, we reject defendant’s argument that, rather than ordering a new hearing, we should reverse and grant suppression. The issue was plainly unpreserved *(see People v Miranda,*27 NY3d 931 [2016]), and, owing to the lack of focus on this issue at the hearing, the record is insufficiently developed with regard to the precise circumstances of the search of defendant’s bag.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.
- -- ·-·--···--- ---·. ·--··- ···- ------**·-----~---:** __ ·--·-· .... ----·- --·-·-·**·-------~~----** -··-------- ·------···-·-----·-----



# _____ 7**~** w

### <'~+-/n j _j

### ~ 

## r-e,s C?.-f"d 

## s on 

## h o_l(.J_±Q 

## 5o**c~Joo~ -8~~~5**  q <-opy 

### c-f**-t:~~ St,..p~\v-~n.~..vrf-q_(** **(___i~k5** ('-ecof'd

### ~1\**t:~--£~Jl.o ~.v:** **>'~j** 

### : 

# ·r r_._ 

## ?._.+-.No c.{)... d-3, 

### Jet 7- 

### B> 

## -;-r-.

__**~+.** No**c~ ;)_1,:J~<D-B**  

## T 

# r**~--~** 

# + . "! o c../J-.**~** 

## :s ( J**~** r
- f2, 

### T r-. 

## c..+- , tV o c_f<. J. -,**~** ?o 

### -8

- ---- -- - ·I

- 

# H**.:u;~.Q_ Q('~**  ·-\

### ~c 

# w.**r~+- N.~** **h~-** s

... 

## w**~** 

### -? 

## 9, :t.,

### -~ 

### l - o 

### g**LU~** .. 

### _'fC?, 

## '7:-3/-67
.wR- ?<g :Z:5l-65

- -------·- - ----- -·- ------------ ---- --- -- -I

- 

### WR- 7'6'13/-ob

- --- . t**'fY\V-...c_~** _; 

# _+ Wo <,<._-/ 

## d k,, {-o**pl-Lf'c~qs..R.,-.** cop1'« s f:rC)., 

## -T!-u__**Lo~+.-** lhCvh k._s 

# +or- yowl

### 'f-,·,~..Q_'**~/e.:;•>-Q__ ~**  eb po o') 

### cl a:::t- y 0 c:.z.r 

## e q_ (' ( I• a:? 

## 7-- c Cl T1 v 

### lfkn (_ .Q_**~**



### - RECEIVED IN

- - - 

# cf\ e.spe

# ~ r-PJ! 'f**COURTOFCRI~INA~~~P;Ah§_** _

### K~r\IL:+h 'Soh>tScF(



### _ MAR 

### 18 2qJS

_**~obe.rfscVl ~;**  

# +-**·r~c** 

## i fJ

### ?9>~

Abel Acosta, Clerk 

### - 1d-C)-'7f 

## FfVI.**~£2'd.-**
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15030]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-015-1610-00: GP8-0202]

Notice of Availability of Beaty Butte Allotment Management Plan 
and Final Environmental Impact Statement (AMP/FEIS)

May 28, 1998.
SUMMARY: The Lakeview District has analyzed the potential environmental 
impacts of a proposed AMP for the Beaty Butte Allotment (0600). The 
proposed plan covers livestock grazing management activities on 
approximately 500,000 acres of public lands administered by the BLM in 
Lake and Harney Counties, Oregon.

DATE: This notice announces the availability of the FEIS for public 
review. Interested parties are encouraged to provide written comments 
to the address below. The public review period will end 30 calendar 
days after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency publishes its' 
Notice of Availability of the document in the Federal Register. This is 
expected on or about June 19, 1998.

ADDRESS: Scott R. Florence, Area Manager, Lakeview Resource Area, BLM, 
PO Box 151, Lakeview, OR 97630.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Those with a known interest in the proposal 
have been sent a copy of the AMP/FEIS. Reading copies are also 
available at the Lake, Klamath, and Harney County, Oregon libraries, 
and at the Public Room, Oregon State Office, BLM, 1515 SW 5th, 
Portland, Oregon. Those desiring a copy of the document may contact 
Richard Mayberry or Paul Whitman at the address above or by telephone 
at (541) 947-2177. All comments will be considered in the preparation 
of the Record of Decision.
Scott R. Florence,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-15030 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
```
# Distribution’s Barr delivers holiday donations to Lebanon VA Medical Center

/ Published Dec. 18, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., December 17, 2020
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution’s Domon Barr, a supply management specialist with the Material Management Division, delivered holiday donations to the Lebanon Veterans Administration Medical Center Dec. 11.

Barr, a veteran himself, spends his off-duty time volunteering as a committee chair/community liaison for the Blacks in Government Region III New Cumberland-Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, Military Veterans Emphasis Program. Barr draws on fellow Distribution employees throughout the year for their generous donations to the BIG Covers Vets Campaign during the holiday season.

This year, Barr delivered over 200 lap, afghan and throw blankets, toiletries, non-perishable food snacks, books, word puzzles, playing cards and socks. In addition, the MVEP chapter provided a check for $2000 to go toward the Lebanon VA’s general purpose fund and Outpatient Behavioral Health Clinic.

The MVEP serves as an internal consultant to BIG and promotes the use of the Veterans Administration and community programs, benefits and services for BIG military veterans and their family members. In addition, MVEP makes recommendations to the National Executive Committee that will better serve military veterans and their families.

BIG MVEP provides interpersonal and online information and support to BIG's military veterans and their families that create more effective pathways to military veteran-oriented resources provided by local and national government/commercial/private organizations by fostering synergies that help ensure BIG military veterans and families maximize military veteran-oriented resources and services.
#### Tobler v. W.C.A.B. (Verizon Pennsylvania Inc.)

12/01/2015

465 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 120 A.3d 448
**Exhibit 32**

 

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

I,the Corporate Trustee of Mesabi Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Mesabi Trust on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended July 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of MesabiTrust.

 
| /s/ Rodney Gaughan                   |   | September 9, 2005 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
| Rodney Gaughan*                      |   |
| Assistant Vice President             |   |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas |   |

 

----

*There are no principal executive officers or principal financial officers ofthe registrant.

 

----
#### Jones v Swede

4th Dept: 147 AD3d 1323

denied
# Employee Spotlight: Cory Jaeger 

/ Published April 20, 2021
RICHMOND, VA, 
*Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs. For more information, call (804) 279-3139.*

**Name:** Cory Jaeger

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Ogden, Utah

**Years of Service:** 3 years

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?** I’m an inventory management specialist. In this capacity, I provide customer support to Air Force customers for A-10 and C-130 aircraft.

**What do you like most about your job?** I am grateful to have a position that allows me to be able to telework from home and just to be employed during this crazy time.

**What is your fondest memory of working for DLA Aviation?** My fondest memory is when I first started working for DLA Aviation as an expeditor, I was tasked with unloading a huge airplane wing off of a semi-trailer using a forklift. That made me a little nervous to say the least.

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction and why?** Just being a part of a great team. Working in aviation is demanding and can get frustrating at times but working with great people who are willing to step in and help makes even the worst situation better.

**What was your first job?** My first job was as a bagger at a grocery store here in Ogden.  

**Do you have an unfulfilled wish?** My dad was recently diagnosed with a Glioblastoma stage 4 brain cancer. And my wish is for him to beat the odds of this terrible disease.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?** Some of my passions outside of work are spending time with my family and friends at our family cabin. I also enjoy ice fishing, shed hunting and snowmobiling.  

**What is your favorite military aircraft and why?** My favorite military aircraft is the Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt, also known as the Warthog. Something that was built that long ago and is still in use today is pretty amazing. Plus, it sounds way awesome.

**What type of music do you most enjoy?** Give me some good old country music!
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shanice Warner, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 601]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered September 25, 2012, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Renwick, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
2017-0915.

#### State v. Romero.

Stark App. No. 2016CA00201, 2017-0hio-2950. On motion of the Ohio Public Defender to stay briefing and allow 30 days to file a jurisdictional memorandum in response. Motion granted. The Ohio Public Defender shall file a memorandum in response to jurisdiction within 30 days. The briefing schedule in this case is stayed, and the clerk of court shall not accept for filing any merit brief until further order of the court.