alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Demetrius Flowers, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[55 NYS3d 51]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered March 16, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the motion of defendants the City of New York, New York City Police Department, Police Officer Carlos Cruz, and Police Officer Jessica Alvarado (collectively, the City), seeking an order pursuant to CPLR 3126 to compel discovery, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion granted to the extent stated herein.

In this action alleging, inter alia, wrongful arrest and prosecution, plaintiff denied at his deposition ever using any aliases or nicknames, including “Moe.” The search warrant leading to plaintiff’s prosecution was based upon controlled drug buys between a confidential informant and an individual named “Moe.” In support of its motions seeking social media information, the City proffered public portions of Facebook pages under the monikers “Moejobrim Moejo,” “Moejoe Brim,” “Moejoebrim Moejo,” “Demetrius Flowers,” and “Moejobrims Brim” that have *591photographs posted that depict plaintiff as the account holder, a fact plaintiff did not deny in opposition to the City’s motion. In addition, one of the account holders alleged to be plaintiff posted a photograph identified as the account holder’s nephew. Plaintiff’s nephew was at the premises, where plaintiff denied having been that day, when the search warrant was executed.

By submitting the above evidence, the City made a threshold showing that examination of the above Facebook accounts will result in the disclosure of relevant evidence bearing on the claim *(see Forman v Henkin,*134 AD3d 529 [1st Dept 2015]; *Tapp v New York State Urban Dev. Corp.,*102 AD3d 620 [1st Dept 2013]; *Richards v Hertz Corp.,*100 AD3d 728 [2d Dept 2012]). As such, plaintiff is directed to review and provide or permit access to those Facebook and associated Messenger accounts, including their messenger components, and any deleted materials which contain any information connecting plaintiff to the accounts in question, connecting him to any variation of the nickname “Moe,” or relevant to his claims that he has had no connection to the apartment searched or the contraband located thereat. Plaintiff shall also provide an authorization permitting Facebook to release the photograph purported to be of plaintiff’s nephew, including any metadata associated with the photograph. Production shall be made within 30 days of this order and it is without prejudice to plaintiff seeking, prior to the expiration of the 30-day period, a protective order for expressly identified materials on these Facebook accounts seeking protection from discovery for reasons other than relevancy.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
#### Rhina M.M., Matter of, v Sandy M.M.

1st Dept: 143 AD3d 426

denied
**Exhibit32.02**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Helen D. McCarthy,Chief Financial Officer of R. J. O’Brien Fund Management, Inc.. (“RJOFM”),Managing Owner of JWH Global Trust (the “Trust”), certify that (i) the attachedannual report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) theinformation contained in the attached annual report on Form 10-K fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Trust.
| By:                                               | /s/ Helen D. McCarthy |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Helen D. McCarthy                                 |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| R.J. O’Brien Fund Management, Inc.           |
| July 5, 2007                                      |

 

----
No. 10-5445.

#### Kimberly Albright-Lazzari, et vir, Petitioners v. Connecticut.

562 U.S. 807, 131 S. Ct. 300,

178 L. Ed. 2d 8,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7773.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Connecticut dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
**Exhibit 23.01**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors of 

Macrovision Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-134478, 333-101071, 333-110271, 333-49404, 333-49390, 333-60499, and 333-23213) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-148209, 333-138596, 333-95337, 333-93477, and 333-55757) on Form S-3 of MacrovisionCorporation of our reports dated February 26, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Macrovision Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income,stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Macrovision Corporation. 

Our audit report on the consolidated financial statementsdated February 26, 2008, refers to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes*, on January 1, 2007, and the adoption of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standard No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*, on January 1, 2006. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Mountain View, California 

February 26, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AZ-910-0777-61-241A]


State of Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting, notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Arizona Resource 
Advisory Council. The meeting will be held July 9, 1998, beginning at 
8:30 a.m. in the New Mexico Room at the BLM National Training Center, 
9828 North 31st Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona. The agenda items to be 
covered at the one-day business meeting include review of previous 
meeting minutes; BLM State Director's Update on legislation, 
regulations and other statewide issues; BLM Presentation on the Yarnell 
Mine Draft EIS, and Updates on the Wild Horse and Burro Strategy, 
Southwest Strategy, Fire Planing; Proposed Field Office Rangeland 
Resource Teams; and Reports by the Standards and Guidelines, Recreation 
and Public Relations Working Groups; Reports from BLM Field Office 
Managers; Reports from RAC members; and Discussion on future meetings. 
A public comment period will take place at 11:30 a.m. on July 9, 1998, 
for any interested publics who wish to address the Council.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah E. Stevens, Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State Office, 
222 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85044-2203, (602) 417-9215.
Denise P. Meridith,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 98-15125 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shondell Butler, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[769 NYS2d 437]

Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga County Court (Walsh, J.), entered October 23, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of arson in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that his plea was coerced *(see People v Newman*[appeal No. 1], 231 AD2d 875 [1996], *lv denied*89 NY2d 944 [1997]; *see also*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Akridge,*253 AD2d 727 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 1027 [1998]; *see generally People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Because we are affirming the judgment in appeal No. 1, “there is no merit to defendant’s contention that the plea on the indictment in appeal No. 2 should be vacated pursuant to *People v Fuggazzatto*(62 NY2d 862, 863 [1984])” *(People v Van Every,*2 AD3d 977, 979 [2003]; *see People v Cato,*306 AD2d 914 [2003]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
# Distribution Future Operations Minto presented commander’s coin

/ Published Feb. 18, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Distribution Future Operations Supply Systems Specialist, Mikie Minto received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution commanding officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition event Feb. 1.

Recently, Minto was on site at DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas with a dedicated small team from DLA Distribution headquarters, Human Recourses and Information Operations to do a management review of the processes for the Warehouse Management System pilot project.

Minto worked side by side with DLA Distribution Corpus Christi deputy commander Jeremy Beckwith and his team providing Headquarters support to the distribution center.

“Mikie has positively contributed to the successes of the WMS pilot program at DLA Distribution Corpus Christi,” said Distribution Future Operations Director Paul Abel.
#### Felix v Felix

2d Dept: 87 AD3d 1106

denied
# DLA Land and Maritime commander visits Pearl Harbor

/ Published March 16, 2020
JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii, 
Associates at Defense Logistics Agency Maritime Pearl Harbor welcomed DLA Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Adm. John T. Palmer Feb. 26-28. The detachment is one of several around the United States helmed by the Central Ohio-based logistics center.

During his visit to Hawaii, Palmer met with several key leaders, visited with the workforce and attended the detachment’s town hall.

At the town hall, Palmer discussed several topics of interest, recognized the detachment’s recent successes and presented several awards. Two associates, Craig Lawson and Luika Lum, received Commander’s Coins for outstanding service. Palmer also recognized two associates who earned Command awards: Lyle Ramel was presented with the Associate of the Month award for January and Dayna Cantu received the Associate of the Month award for February. Lastly, Palmer presented associate Richard Cabo with his 10-year Certificate of Service Award.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 10/09 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Oct 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
No. 12-878.

#### Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic *v.*Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. Ltd. et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of Mexvalo, S. De R.L. De C.V., Respondent, v Desarrolladora Farallon S. De R.L. De C.V., Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 123]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered February 23, 2017, inter alia, confirming an arbitration award, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The record does not support respondent’s contention that the arbitration award should be vacated on the ground of improper influence *(see*CPLR 7511 [b]; *Matter of Sobel [Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.],*37 AD3d 877 [3d Dept 2007]). The documentary evidence shows that the neutral’s potential retention by an af*431filiate of petitioner on an unrelated matter, which was fully disclosed, occurred after the arbitral tribunal reached a decision on the merits. The sufficiency of the evidence is for the arbitrators to determine *(Matter of Peckerman v D & D Assoc.,*165 AD2d 289, 296 [1st Dept 1991]). The tribunal rationally found, after lengthy cross-examination of the chief legal officer of petitioner’s affiliate, that the legal costs that petitioner claimed as damages were credible, that petitioner was willing to provide redacted invoices for in camera inspection, and that, under the terms of the governing documents, petitioner was unconditionally responsible for indemnifying its affiliate for those costs and for recouping the funds from respondent.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Tom, Kapnick, Kern and Moulton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                       908
<INVENTORY>                                     10,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,731
<PP&E>                                          39,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,138
<BONDS>                                         77,596
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         14
<COMMON>                                         9,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,497
<SALES>                                         33,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,383
<CGS>                                           26,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    64
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,905)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (91)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (32)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,846)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.43)


</TABLE>
Power Demand Factor for Selective Catalytic Recovery

7/15/2010

Using an EPA report* on NOx control technologies for portland cement manufacturing, annual 

power demand for SCR was calculated as follows.

1. Total energy costs ($/yr) for model precalciner kilns were divided by the cost of 

electricity ($0.05/kwh) to estimate annual energy consumption (kwh/yr). 

2. Kiln capacity was given as tons clinker/hr. The report stated that kilns operated 8000 

hr/yr. Using hourly clinker capacity and annual hours of operation, total annual clinker 

production was calculated.

3. Total annual energy consumption (step 1) was divided by total annual clinker production 

(step 2) to get kwh/ton clinker.

The steps are summarized in the table.

SCR Electricity Demand Factor, Precalciner Kilns

Energy Cost *

($/yr)

Electricity cost 

($/kwh)*

Electricity 

use/yr 

(kwh/yr)

Kiln Capacity

(tons 

clinker/hr)*

Hrs of 

Operation 

(Hrs/yr)*

Annual 

clinker 

production 

(tons 

clinker/yr)

Kwh/ton 

clinker

930000 0.05 18600000 100 8000 800000 23

1400000 0.05 28000000 150 8000 1200000 23

*US EPA, NOx Control Technologies for the Cement Industry, September 19, 2000, pp. 84, 

87, 104.
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 014

Attachment Name

CAS RN 1456802-88-2 Manufacturing Process and Impurity Profile

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 3. (Chem 3)

Contains CBI

Report Number

 Sanitized Version
All CBI has been removed
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**877 CAF 14-01769**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF RENYHIA M. AND RAHMIER M. --------------------------------------------- MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COMMISSIONER OF THE ONTARIO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT;
SHAWNA M., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

SUSAN GRAY JONES, CANANDAIGUA, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
JOHN W. PARK, COUNTY ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (HOLLY A. ADAMS OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
JOSEPH S. DRESSNER, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, CANANDAIGUA.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Ontario County (Craig J. Doran, J.), entered September 2, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order terminated the parental rights of respondent. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Family Court properly granted the petition seeking to terminate the parental rights of respondent mother with respect to the subject children on the ground of permanent neglect. The mother admitted that she permanently neglected the children, and the record of the dispositional hearing supports the court’s determination that the best interests of the children would be served by terminating the mother’s parental rights and freeing the children for adoption ( see Matter of La’Derrick J.W. [Ashley W.] , 85 AD3d 1600, 1602, lv denied 17 NY3d 709; Matter of Eleydie R

. [Maria R.] , 77 AD3d 1423, 1424). We reject the mother’s contention that the court abused its discretion in declining to enter a suspended judgment. “The court’s focus at the dispostional hearing is the best interests of the child[ren,] . . . [and] [t]he court’s assessment that the [mother] was not likely to change her behavior is entitled to great deference” ( Matter of Kyle S ., 11 AD3d 935, 936 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Furthermore, “the record of the dispositional hearing establishes that . . . any progress that [the mother] made was not sufficient to warrant any further prolongation of the child[ren’s] unsettled familial status” ( Matter of Kyla E

. [Stephanie F.] , 126 AD3d 1385, 1386, lv denied ___ NY3d ___ [June 10, 2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Lastly, we reject the mother’s contention that she**-2- 877 CAF 14-01769** 
was denied effective assistance of counsel “inasmuch as [she] did not demonstrate the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel’s alleged shortcomings” ( Matter of Brown v Gandy , 125 AD3d 1389, 1390 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Entered: July 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.03


                             AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS OF
                         PACIFICARE HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

        This Amendment (the "Amendment") to the Bylaws of PacifiCare Health
Systems, Inc. (the "Bylaws") dated this 24th day of October 2000, with reference
to the following facts:

                                    RECITALS

        WHEREAS, PacifiCare Health Systems,  Inc.  ("PacifiCare")  has adopted
the Bylaws, as the official bylaws of the PacifiCare;

        WHEREAS, PacifiCare's Board of Directors deems it advisable and in the
best interest of PacifiCare to amend PacifiCare's Bylaws to reduce the
authorized number of Directors from twelve (12) to ten (10).

        NOW, THEREFORE, the Bylaws are amended as follows:

        1.     Amendment to the Bylaws.  Section 15 of the Bylaws is deleted in
its entirety and replaced with the following:

        "SECTION 15. NUMBER AND TERM OF OFFICE. The authorized number of
directors of the corporation shall be ten (10). Directors need not be
stockholders unless so required by the Certificate of Incorporation. If for any
cause the directors shall not have been elected at an annual meeting, they may
be elected as soon thereafter as convenient at a special meeting of the
stockholders called for that purpose in the manner provided in these Bylaws."

        2.     Effect of this Amendment. Except as amended by this Amendment,
PacifiCare's Bylaws shall not be further amended, modified, or revised and the
Bylaws, as hereby amended, shall continue in full force and effect and shall be
enforced in accordance with their terms.

        3.     Bylaws.  The official bylaws of the PacifiCare shall consist of
the Bylaws and this Amendment adopted on October 24, 2000.  Any reference to
the term "bylaws" shall mean and refer to the Bylaws, as amended by this
Amendment.
160 A.3d 707

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANTONIO WILLIAMS (A/K/A ALTONIA WILLIAMS, ASA FANN, ATONIOY WILLIAMS, ANTONIO FANN, ANTHONY A. WILLIAMS, SHY GUY, ALTONIA D. WILLIAMS, AND ASA WILLIAMS), DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                                                      
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Bangladesh (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | W   |     | W   |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024