alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Maritime Portsmouth increases submarine support capacity

/ Published April 15, 2021
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Maritime Portsmouth has completed construction on a 29,000-square-foot addition to their maintenance facility that will significantly increase their maritime operational capacity.

As part of planned military construction, the new Consolidated Global Warehouse facility replaces an older, unusable one. Its construction completes an $18.5 million upgrade that provides added servicing capability for U.S. Navy submarines requiring needed maintenance repairs. DLA Maritime Portsmouth maintains maintenance capacity in 10 other buildings spread throughout Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine.

“The main reason for this investment is the increased storage capacity it provides, along with a more technologically advanced and safer warehousing operation,” said Navy Cdr. Chris Donnelly, officer in charge at DLA Maritime Portsmouth. “We're looking forward to the positive impact this addition has on DLA's ability to better service the shipyard. The contractor did an incredible job to deliver this project on-schedule despite construction efforts largely coinciding with the global pandemic.”

Donnelly said the warehouse addition continues the excellent partnership between the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard and the Defense Logistics Agency.

The facility will house three automated material handling systems which will help to dramatically increase maintenance support output.

One of the systems handles Navy pallets and includes 624 locations and each can hold up to 5,000 pounds. The second system handles sheet metal and contains 177 locations that support sheet metal pieces up to 144 inches long and 24 inches high. The last system supports lumber usage. It has 234 locations and supports several height and length ranges with a capacity of up to 5,000 pounds.

DLA Maritime Portsmouth is one of DLA Land and Maritime’s four shipyard detachments. It plays a critical role in supporting the U.S. submarine fleet requirements and the nation’s defense strategy.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF EPIX MEDICAL, INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001027702
<NAME> EPIX MEDICAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,667,892
<SECURITIES>                                 7,996,186
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,733,434
<PP&E>                                       2,506,499
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,512,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,574,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,434,284
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       17,203,807
<PREFERRED>                                  1,037,664
<COMMON>                                        15,644
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,293,101)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,574,567
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,009,739
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,740,572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             288,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                268,062
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            268,062
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   268,062
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
# Honoring Black History Month: Air Force Maj. Gen. Rufus Billups, first African-American DGSC commander 

/ Published Feb. 11, 2019
RICHMOND, VA, 
Along a stretch of wall on the first floor of the Operations Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia are the photos of the past 31 commanders. 

Along the top row is a picture of the late Air Force Brig. Gen. Rufus Billups. He served as commander of DSCR when it was named Defense General Supply Center from 1975 through 1978. An achievement only dwarfed by the fact that Billups was the first African-American to hold this title.

When he arrived at DGSC, the installation was facing an Equal Employment Opportunity discrimination complaint brought by Lillie Mae Brown, a systems analyst and African American, in May 1974. This would become a historic class action lawsuit. 

Brown alleged that the installation discriminated against her on the basis of gender, age and race. With her allegation, others emerged with their own testimonies and on August 26, 1975, the class action lawsuit was put into motion. Two years later, on September 19, 1977, a court decree was issued paving the way for great advancements in equality for DSCR employees. 

Brown was inducted into the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Hall of Fame in 2011 and the DLA Hall of Fame in 2018.

According to DLA Aviation Hall of Fame records, “Brown was not just a true leader, but an icon in Bellwood history.” 

Billups was adamant about fulfilling the terms of the agreement by increasing the number of women and minorities in trainee, middle- and high-grade positions. 

He was the first to institute the upward mobility program to allow wage-grade employees to be converted to and/or compete for general schedule positions. Because of his commitment to enhancing the educational and skill levels of the work force, he was the first to offer a 100 percent tuition reimbursable program and to have college courses offered at the center. In addition, it was under his leadership that the first master’s degree program was offered here. 

Born in Birmingham, Alabama, in 1928, Billups graduated from Tuskegee Institute, Tuskegee, Alabama, in 1949 with a Bachelor of Science degree. He was in the Air Force Reserve Officers' Training Corps at Tuskegee and was commissioned a second lieutenant upon graduation. 

He would go on to receive a master's degree in business administration from the University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, in 1957 and an honorary doctorate from Guadalupe College, Sequin, Texas in 1974.

Billups served in the Air Force for more than 30 years, rising to the rank of major general in 1978, before retiring in 1980. He passed away on Jan. 30, 1996. 

Billups was inducted into the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Hall of Fame in 2006. His contributions to the center are evident throughout DSCR today because he laid the foundation for diversity and employee development.
#### Mary Parke, Appellant, v ST Owner LP, et al., Defendants, and Strike Force of New Jersey, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[50 NYS3d 288]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered March 9, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendants Strike Force of New Jersey, Inc. (Strike Force) and Jonathan Ubogu for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was injured when she fell down a darkened staircase in her apartment building, which was left without electricity in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. The building’s owners retained Strike Force to provide additional security guards in the building and to control access to the lobby, since the lack of electricity prevented the electronic access card readers on the building’s entrances from working.

Plaintiff asserted that, upon returning to her building, defendant Ubogu, a Strike Force security guard, advised her that it was “okay” to use her cell phone to light her way up the staircase since her flashlight was no longer working. She further asserted that Ubogu turned his own flashlight on, and guided her to the doorway of the staircase and up the first flight of stairs. When she reached the landing, Ubogu turned his flashlight off, leaving her in the dark. When she then attempted to find the stairway to continue up, she instead fell down the flight of stairs she had just ascended.

Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, Ubogu did not voluntarily assume a duty of care toward her by any negligent words or acts inducing reliance *(see Heard v City of New York,*82 NY2d 66, 71-72 [1993]). Obogu’s casual response of “okay,” in response to plaintiff’s suggestion that she use her cell phone to light her way up the stairs, did not amount to a “deliberate representation for purposes of determining whether an action in negligence has been established” *(id.*at 74-75; *see Ferrari v Bob’s Canoe Rental, Inc.,*143 AD3d 937, 939 [2d Dept 2016]).

*598Furthermore, Ubogu’s conduct in shining his flashlight up the first flight of stairs did not alter the fact that plaintiff had intended to climb the steps in the first place, and was already using her cell phone for light. Accordingly, Ubogu’s actions did not place plaintiff “in a more vulnerable position” than she would have been in had he done nothing *(Murshed v New York Hotel Trades Council*& *Hotel Assn. of N.Y. City Health Ctr., Inc.,*71 AD3d 578, 579 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00256-CR

MATTHEW RYAN JERRY VANOVER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 28,845

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
2

O RDER

Matthew Ryan Jerry Vanover appeals from his conviction of indecency with a child and 

the resulting sentence of seven years’ imprisonment. The reporter’s record in this appeal was 

filed January 14, 2014, and the clerk’s record was filed March 19, making the appellant’s brief 

due April 18. This Court extended the briefing deadline twice on Vanover’s motions, resulting 

in the current due date of June 9. Vanover has now filed a motion seeking abatement of the 

briefing deadline.

To support his abatement request, Vanover claims that the reporter’s record is 

incomplete. More specifically, he complains that the pre-trial hearing was omitted from the 

appellate record. Vanover has requested that the omitted hearing be transcribed and filed with 

this Court, and he seeks an abatement of his briefing deadline until that transpires. A 

supplemental reporter’s record was filed with this Court on June 16, 2014, containing a 

transcription of the missing pre-trial hearing. As the missing portion of the reporter’s record is 

now a part of the appellate record, Vanover’s motion to abate his briefing deadline is overruled.

Further, after reviewing Vanover’s motion and the appellate record, including the recent 

supplementation to the reporter’s record, we find no compelling information to convince us that 

this brief requires more time to prepare. Consequently, we order counsel to file appellant’s brief 

with this Court on or before June 30, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: June 17, 2014
No. 09-1574.

#### Howard Morgan, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 841, 131 S. Ct. 220,

178 L. Ed. 2d 47,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5782.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied.

Same case below, 394 Ill. App. 3d 1103, 369 Ill. Dec. 94, 985 N.E.2d 1080.
Exhibit
15.8



CONSENT



We
hereby consent to the reference to our valuation report in respect of options granted by Plaza Centers N.V. (“the Company”)
on March 14, 2012, May 22, 2012, August 21, 2012, November 20, 2012 and ESOP No.1 re-pricing valuation and March 13, 2013, August
22, 2013 under ESOP no.2 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging Ltd., and to the incorporation by reference
of this Annual Report in the Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-194519) and in the Registration Statement
on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-172122) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852,
No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) of Elbit Imaging Ltd.



This
consent is not to be construed as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to be filed
under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



|/s/
    Financial Immunities Dealing Room Ltd. | 
|---------------------------------------------- | 
|Financial
    Immunities Dealing Room Ltd.     | 
|                                               | 
|Ness
    Ziona, Israel                         | 
|November
    9, 2017                           |
#### Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene

1st Dept: 144 AD3d 59

granted
#### Com. v. Grant

12/16/2015

511 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1125
#### Com. v. Prince.

06/30/2016

62 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 79
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Dwayne Rayshaun Wilson v. Sterling Shire Apartments

A ppellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 0 0 785

- C V

Trial court case number: 1098747

Trial court: Harris County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Appellant, Dwayne Rayshaun Wilson, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s final judgment in a forcible detainer action brought by appellee, Sterling Shire Apartments. In his notice of appeal , appellant named Sterling Shire, its attorney, Duke Amos, and the Honorable Robert Lloyd, presiding judge of Harris County Civil Court of Law No. 4, as appellees. An appellee, however, must be a party to t he trial court’s final judgment and someone against whom the appellant raises issues or points of error in the appellant’s brief. See Gray v. Allen

, 41 S.W.3d 330, 331 n.2 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2001, no pet.); see also Showbiz Multimedia, LLC v. Mountain S tates Mortg. Ctrs., Inc. , 303 S.W.3d 769, 771 n.3 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, no pet.). Although appellant raises issues against them in his brief, neither Amos nor Judge Lloyd are parties to the final judgment in the underlying case. Therefore, A mos and Judge Lloyd are not “ appellees” or otherwise parties to this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss as moot (1) “Putative Appellees the Honorable Roberta Lloyd

- County Court at Law No. 4’s Opposed Motion to Dismiss,” (2) “Putative Appellees

the Honorable Roberta Lloyd

- County Court at Law No. 4’s Opposed Motion to Stay Briefing Deadline ,” and (3) Amos’s “Co

- Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss.”

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloy d

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: January 25 , 2018
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Poland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Poland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 4.26   | --     | 5.45  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.03   | 7.88   | 11.08  | 6.39   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.2

 

**                                                THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY                                                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                                                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                                      SECTION 906                                                                           OF THE                                                    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the"Company") onForm 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and ExchangeCommission on the datehereof (the "Report"), theundersigned, in the capacity and on the dateindicated below, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects,the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to TheMonarchCement Company and will be retained by The MonarchCement Company and furnishedto the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

Dated:  August 8, 2008

                                                                                              /s/ Debra P. Roe                                                                                                                      Debra P. Roe, CPA                                                                                            Chief Financial Officer and                                                                                            Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
<PAGE>


Rogers Closes Previously Announced C$250 Million Equity Issuance

      TORONTO, June 16 /CNW/ -- Further to its release of June 9, 2004, Rogers
Communications Inc. (TSX: RCI.A and RCI.B, NYSE: RG) (the "Company") announced
today that it has closed the issuance of 9,541,985 Class B Non-Voting shares
(the "Shares") to RBC Capital Markets. The Shares were sold on a "bought deal"
basis at a price of C$26.20 per Share for net proceeds, excluding expenses, of
approximately C$240 million. The net proceeds will be used for general corporate
purposes.

      Copies of the final shelf prospectus and prospectus supplement may be
obtained from RBC Capital Markets, P.O. Box 50, 200 Bay Street, Toronto,
Ontario, M5J 2W7, telephone (416) 842-2000.

      This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the
solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of the shares in any
jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior
to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such
jurisdiction.

      Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Information: This news
release includes certain forward looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and
uncertainties. Rogers Communications Inc. (the "Company") cautions that actual
future performance will be affected by a number of factors, including
technological change, regulatory change and competitive factors, many of which
are beyond the Company's control. Therefore, future events and results may vary
substantially from what the Company currently foresees. The Company is under no
obligation to (and expressly disclaims any such obligation to) update or alter
its forward looking statements whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. Important additional information identifying risks and
uncertainties is contained in the Company's most recent Annual Report and Annual
Information Form filed with the Ontario Securities Commission and the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission.

      About Rogers Communications: Rogers Communications Inc. (TSX: RCI.A and
RCI.B; NYSE: RG) is a diversified Canadian communications and media company,
which is engaged in cable television, high-speed Internet access and video
retailing through Canada's largest cable television provider Rogers Cable Inc.;
wireless voice and data communications services through Canada's leading
national GSM/GPRS cellular provider Rogers Wireless Communications Inc.; and
radio, television broadcasting, televised shopping and publishing businesses
through Rogers Media Inc.

/For further information: (Investors and Analysts): Bruce M. Mann, (416)
935-3532, bruce.mann@rci.rogers.com; Eric Wright, (416) 935-3550,
eric.wright@rci.rogers.com; (Media): Jan Innes, (416) 935-3525,
jinnes@rci.rogers.com; Archived images on this organization are available
through CNW E-Pix at http://www.newswire.ca. Images are free to members of The
Canadian Press./
Exhibit 32.1

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending May 29, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Connie
Wood, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Connie Wood
-----------------------------
Connie Wood, President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)