alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Marisol Realty Corp., Appellant, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent.

[62 NYS3d 331]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alexander W. Hunter, J.), entered July 14, 2015, denying the petition to annul a final order of respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR), dated July 3, 2014, which denied the Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) and affirmed the order of the DHCR Rent Administrator, dated December 7, 2012, which found that apartment No. 3 in the subject building was rent-stabilized, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

DHCR’s denial of the PAR had a rational basis and was neither arbitrary nor capricious. Documentary evidence submitted by the tenant established that the building, which was constructed before 1974, had at least six housing accommodations, and was therefore subject to rent stabilization *(see*9 *464NYCRR 2520.11 [d]; *see Wilson v One Ten Duane St. Realty Co.,*123 AD2d 198 [1st Dept 1987]). Petitioner did not respond to the tenant’s submissions.

Contrary to petitioner’s argument, DHCR properly refused to accept evidence submitted for the first time by petitioner at the PAR, where the scope of review was limited to facts or evidence before the Rent Administrator (9 NYCRR 2529.6). Moreover, DHCR rationally determined that petitioner did not meet its burden of demonstrating good cause to warrant a remand to the Rent Administrator to consider the additional evidence (9 NYCRR 2529.6; *see Matter of Gilman v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*99 NY2d 144, 150 [2002]). Petitioner’s denial of the receipt of DHCR’s notices requesting a response to the tenant’s submission was unsworn, and there was not an affidavit or affirmation from counsel denying receipt of DHCR’s notices. Petitioner’s claim of law office failure was speculation.

The Rent Stabilization Code permitted, but did not require, DHCR to inspect the premises before making a determination (9 NYCRR 2527.5 [b]). DHCR’s decision not to inspect the premises was not an abuse of discretion, given that petitioner did not respond to the Rent Administrator’s notices requesting a response to the tenant’s submissions. Although petitioner disputed the accuracy of the documents at the PAR, it was for DHCR to weigh the evidence that the parties submitted *(Matter of Jane St. Co. v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*165 AD2d 758 [1st Dept 1990], *lv denied*77 NY2d 801 [1991]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Richter, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
# How to find out about changes in DSCR operating status during inclement weather, other emergencies

/ Published Jan. 19, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
Hazardous weather is once again predicted for the Richmond Metro area later this week.  When winter-like weather or hazardous driving conditions do arrive, how will you be notified of changes in Defense Supply Center Richmond’s operating status?

There are several ways center employees can find out about changes in the installation’s operating status during inclement weather and other emergencies. If there are any changes in operating status (i.e. delayed openings, closures), the home page of DLA Aviation’s public website will display a change in status. Employees can also call the DSCR Information/Hazardous Weather Hotline at (804) 279-3599.

Richmond area television stations (WTVR 6, WRIC 8 and WWBT 12) also run installation delays or closure announcements both on-air and on their webpages.

Employees can be notified of operating status changes on their mobile or home numbers, text or personal email by signing up for the AtHoc computer-based emergency notification system (available for common-access card holders who are current DLA employees). To make sure personal information is up-to-date, log into AtHoc, which can be found in each employees’ desktop applications or by clicking on the “show hidden icons” bar on the bottom of your computer screen. Once AtHoc opens, click on “Access Self Service” to review and/or update email addresses and contact numbers.

An Emergency Notification Guide outlines all the methods listed above to remain aware of changes to the installation’s operational status.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15538]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Office of International Energy Policy
[Public Notice 2832]


Notice of Receipt of Application for a Permit for Pipeline 
Facilities To Be Constructed and Maintained on the Borders of the 
United States

AGENCY: Office of International Energy Policy, Department of State.
    The Department of State has received an application from Boise 
Cascade Corporation, a Delaware corporation, for a Presidential Permit, 
pursuant to Executive Order 11423 of August 16, 1968, as amended by 
Executive Order 12847 of May 17, 1993, seeking authorization for the 
continued operation and maintenance of four existing pipelines at the 
International Dam at International Falls, Minnesota on the U.S.-Canada 
border. The dam extends across the border between International Falls 
and Fort Frances, Ontario.
    The pipelines were constructed in the 1915-40 period and have been 
in use since that time. The pipelines traverse the International Dam 
for a distance of approximately 1030 feet and convey water, steam, and 
filler material between the applicant's paper mill and a pulp and paper 
mill located in Fort Frances, Ontario. There will be no construction 
and no changes in the present use of the pipelines.

DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit, in duplicate, comments 
relative to this proposal on or before July 13, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel L. Martinez, Office of 
International Energy Policy, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520. 
Tel: (202) 647-4557.

    Dated: May 28, 1998.
William A. Weingarten,
Director, Office of International Energy and Commodities Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-15538 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
No. 09-11186.

#### Kun Tauch, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 866, 131 S. Ct. 155,

178 L. Ed. 2d 93,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6604.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.
No. 09-11148.

#### Richard Manuel Burgos, Petitioner v. Michael Yarborough, Warden, et al.

562 U.S. 864, 131 S. Ct. 147,

178 L. Ed. 2d 89,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6715.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 799.
No. 10-5052.

#### Michael Craig Smith, Petitioner v. Illinois.

562 U.S. 901, 131 S. Ct. 234,

178 L. Ed. 2d 155,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6344.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District, denied.

Same case below, 394 Ill. App. 3d 1126, 369 Ill. Dec. 103, 985 N.E.2d 1089.
Exhibit 23.2



         CONSENT OF PRIOR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-113094 on Form S-8 and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 333-113094 on Form S-8 of our report dated October 12, 2005,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Bioenvision,
Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Bioenvision, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2006.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
September 8, 2006
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Healthway Medical Care, P.C., as Assignee of Thomas, Heather, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>MVAIC, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Marshall &amp; Marshall, PLLC (Barbara Carabell of counsel), for appellant.The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Jodi Orlow, J.), entered July 27, 2016. The judgment, entered pursuant to a decision of that court dated July 12, 2016, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,515.75.</p><p>ORDERED that, on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the decision dated July 12, 2016 is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment entered July 27, 2016 (<i>see</i> CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.</p><p>After a nonjury trial in this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits from Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC), the Civil Court awarded judgment to plaintiff in the principal sum of $2,515.75. </p><p>Plaintiff, as assignee, was required to exhaust its remedies against all potential insurance carriers before seeking relief from defendant (<i>see Hauswirth v American Home Assur. Co.</i>, 244 AD2d 528 [1997]; <i>Orlin &amp; Cohen Orthopedic Assoc. v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp.</i>, 58 Misc <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>3d 132[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 51778[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2017]). Here, plaintiff did not demonstrate that it had exhausted its remedies. As a result, plaintiff's claim is premature (<i>see Matter of Acosta-Collado v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp.</i>, 103 AD3d 714 [2013]; <i>Hauswirth</i>, 244 AD2d 528). </p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for the entry of a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: May 03, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
# Employees can support Ukraine relief efforts through special round of CFC 

/ Published April 22, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Employees now have through June 30 to support charities serving and affected by the war in Ukraine and the resulting humanitarian and refugee crisis through a temporary reopening of the Combined Federal Campaign. 

Donors can contribute to thousands of charities, many of which are working overtime to assist refugees needing food, clean water, medical care, shelter and more. One hundred percent of the donations will go to charities, and employees may donate even if they didn’t participate in the campaign that ended in January. 

“Through the annual Combined Federal Campaign, members of the federal family demonstrate that our commitment to public service extends far beyond the workplace, OPM Director Kiran Ahuja said. “In this moment of need, our efforts should focus on assisting the people of Ukraine.”

President Joe Biden ordered federal assistance in March to help ease the burden on those impacted by the war. Ahuja authorized the special solicitation period because many local, national, and international human welfare organizations in the CFC are supplementing efforts to provide critical services. 

DLA employees in the national capital region donated almost $276,000 toward a $300,000 goal during the 2021 campaign season. Federal employees have collectively raised over $8.5 billion for CFC since it began in 1961. 

Donations supporting Ukraine can be made to one or more of the organizations included in the 2021 CFC Charity List at the CFC online portal.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2005

AN ACT

To make certain technical corrections, and for other

purposes.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2005

AN ACT

To make certain technical corrections, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.

4 (a) Sections 101B(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) and

5 103B(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7

6 U.S.C. 1441–2(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) and 1444–

7 2(c)(1)(D)(v)(II)) are each amended by inserting ‘‘without

8 regard to clause (ii)’’ after ‘‘clause (iii)’’.
2

•S 2005 ES

1 (b) Section 105B(c)(1)(B)(iii)(IV)(bb) of such Act (7

2 U.S.C. 1444f(c)(1)(B)(iii)(IV)(bb)) is amended by strik3 ing ‘‘clause (i)(I)’’ and inserting ‘‘clauses (i) and (ii)’’.

4 (c) Section 204(g) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 1446e(g))

5 is amended—

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting after ‘‘pur7 chase’’ the following: ‘‘(less sales under section 407

8 for unrestricted use)’’; and

9 (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after ‘‘pur10 chases’’ each place it appears the following: ‘‘(less

11 sales under section 407 for unrestricted use)’’.

Passed the Senate March 25 (legislative day, February 22), 1994.

Attest:

Secretary.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Covansys Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
James S. Trouba, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ James S. Trouba James S. Trouba
Chief Financial Officer
March 7, 2007
Exhibit 10.2

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of Elbit Systems
Ltd. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-9354 and 333-139512) of our report dated March 13, 2007,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Elisra Electronic Systems Ltd.
and subsidiaries, which report appears in this December 31, 2006 annual report on Form
20-F of Elbit Systems Ltd.

/s/ Somekh Chaikin Somekh Chaikin 
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

Tel-Aviv, Israel,
June 13, 2007
**Logo of DIXON HUGHES PLLC**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





The
      Board
      of Directors


First
      South Bancorp, Inc.





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
      333-132623, No. 333-49759 and No. 333-104144) on Forms S-8 of First South
      Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary of our report dated March 7, 2006, except as to
      the
      stock split discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements which
      is as of May 25, 2006, with respect to the 2005 consolidated statements of
      operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of First South
      Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary, which report appears in First South Bancorp,
      Inc.’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.





/s/
      Dixon
      Hughes PLLC





Greenville,
      North Carolina


March
      5,
      2008
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 8, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D23

- 0200

Lower Tribunal Nos. F04

- 25415, F04

- 25416



### Ronnie Howard,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Ramiro Areces,

Judge.

Ronnie Howard, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Drone/VAS Practice Group 

ANTONELLI 

--LAW- ,---

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

35 E Wacker Drive 

Suite 1875 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Tel. 312.201.8310 

JefJrev(ZvAntonelli-Law.com 

January 21, 2016 

Re: Amendment to Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. Exemption No. 11467 

Regulatory Docket No. F AA-20 15-0261 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Our client, Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. ("AIR") requests an amendment to FAA 

Exemption No. 11467, Docket No. FAA-2015-0261 for the purpose of conducting tethered 

commercial UA operations. Our client has been approved to use the DJI S800, S900, and S1000, 

in addition to a proprietary UA, the ReadyCopter. We ask for expedited approval for this 

amendment due to the reduction of risk of fatal falls. 

AIR now seeks permission to operate these UAs using a tethered configuration. This 

tethered configuration has been described in the confidential materials being submitted along with 

this letter. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §11.35, AIR requests confidential treatment for information 

regarding the tethering system, submitted under separate over. It requests that the information 

contained in that document not be made public because it is a trade secret whose disclosure would 

harm the owner of the information. It contains valuable commercial data that is not publicly 

available and is protected from release under the Freedom oflnformation Act, 5 U.S.C. §552(b)(4). 

If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this 

document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 312-201-831 0 or via email at Jetfrev(il{AntonelliLaw.com. 

Attorneys for Aerial Inspe
#### Jia Wang, Appellant, v Dan Zhao, Also Known as Danyang Zhao, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[58 NYS3d 14]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered May 4, 2016, which granted defendant Dan Zhao’s motion to confirm the report of a special referee, made after a hearing, recommending dismissal of the complaint against Zhao based on lack of personal jurisdiction, denied plaintiff’s cross motion to reject the report’s recommendation, and dismissed the complaint as against Zhao, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered August 9, 2016, which, to the extent appealable, denied plaintiff’s motion to renew, unanimously affirmed, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s contention that Zhao testified falsely at the traverse hearing is unsupported by the record. Contrary to plaintiff’s argument, Zhao acknowledged in his testimony that he used one apartment at 130 Water Street as his mailing address on various documents and that he owned another apartment in that building. The Small Claims Court records relied upon by plaintiff do not contradict Zhao’s testimony and, in any event, are irrevelant because they postdate plaintiff’s attempted service on Zhao by almost two years.

The relevant inquiry at the traverse hearing was whether the address where plaintiff’s process server attempted to serve the summons and complaint was Zhao’s “dwelling place or usual place of abode” (CPLR 308 [2]). Zhao’s testimony that he *539did not reside in either apartment at 130 Water Street was corroborated by the doorman’s testimony, and plaintiff has pointed to no contradictory evidence.

The special referee properly denied plaintiff’s request for an adjournment or continuance, because plaintiff did not adequately explain her failure to appear personally or to have a witness present, and Zhao had come from China for the hearing.

The motion to renew was not based on new facts that would change the prior determination *(see*CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; *see also Matter of Naomi S. v Steven E.,*147 AD3d 568 [1st Dept 2017]), and no appeal lies from an order denying reargument *(see Naomi S.,*147 AD3d 568).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.
164 A.3d 413

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KORY S. MCCLARY (A/K/A MERLIN MCCLARY, KORY MCLARY), DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 30, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
Opinion filed May 27, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-10-00116-CR

__________

CAROL JOHNENE MORRIS, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 441st District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR-36894/recusal

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to recuse. We dismiss for want of 

jurisdiction.

When the clerk’s record was filed in this court on April 30, 2010, the clerk of this court 

wrote the parties stating that the March 16, 2010 order did not appear to be an appealable order. 

Morris was directed to respond to this court in writing on or before May 17, 2010, showing 

grounds for continuing her appeal. There has been no response to our April 30 letter.

The March 16 order is not appealable at this time; therefore, this appeal is dismissed. 

PER CURIAM

May 27, 2010

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
164 A.3d 413

#### ANIMAL PROTECTION LEAGUE OF NEW JERSEY, ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE, UNEXPECTED WILDLIFE REFUGE, BORN FREE USA, SIERRA CLUB, LAWYERS IN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS, AND ASSOCIATED HUMANE SOCIETIES, APPELLANTS-PETITIONERS, v. NEW JERSEY FISH AND GAME COUNCIL, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, AND NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

March 31, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.