alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2217 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2217

 To restrict accompanied tours for Armed Forces personnel assigned to 
                                Europe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 21 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mr. Feingold) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To restrict accompanied tours for Armed Forces personnel assigned to 
                                Europe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACCOMPANIED TOURS FOR ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO 
              EUROPE.

    (a) Payment for Dependents.--
            (1) Restriction.--Subject to paragraph (2)--
                    (A) no travel and transportation expenses may be 
                paid for dependents to accompany members of the Armed 
                Forces of the United States assigned to permanent duty 
                ashore in Europe; and
                    (B) no funds may be expended for support of 
                dependents accompanying members of the Armed Forces of 
                the United States assigned to permanent duty ashore in 
                Europe.
            (2) Waiver authority.--
                    (A) Essential personnel.--The Secretary of Defense 
                may waive the application of paragraph (1) to a member 
                of the Armed Forces if the Secretary determines that 
                the assignment of that member to permanent duty ashore 
                in Europe for a period of more than one year is 
                necessary in order to ensure the continuity of 
                effective conduct of necessary activities of the Armed 
                Forces of the United States in Europe.
                    (B) National security interests.--The Secretary of 
                Defense may waive the application of paragraph (1) when 
                necessary in the national security interests of the 
                United States.
    (b) Short Tours.--It is the sense of Congress that the period of 
assignment of a member of the Armed Forces to permanent duty ashore in 
Europe should not exceed one year.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14144]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-98-009]


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: June 11, 1998 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agenda for future meeting: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 753-TA-34 (Extruded Rubber Thread from Malaysia)--
briefing and vote.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 21, 1998.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14144 Filed 5-22-98; 2:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 32898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15987]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34, 335]


Estela Tops, Huntington Park, CA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 16, 1998 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on March 16, 1998 on behalf of workers at Estala Tops, 
Huntington Park, California.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 12th day of May, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-15987 Filed 6-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 32



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of
section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation (Qwest), that, to his knowledge, the
Quarterly Report of Qwest on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this
statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                                     
|------------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 3, 2006 |  | By: |  | /S/    RICHARD C. NOTEBAERT                                         
|                   |  |     |  | Richard C. Notebaert Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President
|                   |  |    
|Dated: May 3, 2006 |  | By: |  | /S/    OREN G. SHAFFER                                              
|                   |  |     |  | Oren G. Shaffer Vice Chairman and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification
 Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Modine Manufacturing Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael B. Lucareli, Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
February 9, 2011
 
 
 /s/ Michael B. Lucareli
 Michael B. Lucareli
 Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit
15.16



CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-194519) and in the Registration
Statement on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-172122) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509,
No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd. of our auditors report dated November 9, 2017,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of Elbit Imaging Ltd. as of December 31, 2016.



|/s/
    KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER | 
|------------------------------------ | 
|KOST
    FORER GABBAY & KASIERER     | 
|                                     | 
|A
    member of Ernst & Young Global | 
|                                     | 
|Tel-Aviv,
    Israel                 | 
|November
    9, 2017                 |
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer I, Norbert E. Woodhams, Sr. certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pierre Foods, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Norbert E. Woodhams, Sr.Norbert E. Woodhams, Sr.Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 Date: October 25, 2004 31
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Systems Ltd.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Joseph Ackerman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.

Date: June 28, 2005

                                                   /s/ Joseph Ackerman
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Joseph Ackerman
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
#### Housing Mortgage Corporation, Appellant, *v.*Allied Construction Company, Inc. (et al., Appellant).

Argued March 28, 1951.

Before Drew, C. J., Stern, Jones, Bell, Ladner and Chidsey, JJ..

*W. Denning Stewart,*with him *Ira Hurwick*and *Harold L. Both,*for plaintiff.

*Myron E. Rowley,*with him *James E. Hindman, Ralph E. Smith*and *Rowley & Smith,*for defendant.

*352May 23,1951:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal involves two questions: The first is whether an agreement governing the advances to be made by the advance money mortgagee and incorporated in the advance money mortgage by reference is also incorporated in the subordinated purchase money mortgage by the reference therein to the advance money mortgage to which it was subordinated.

The second question is whether in fact the advance money mortgagee substantially complied with the schedule. Counsel for that mortgagee earnestly argued that there were no excessive or over advances actually made.

The first question is an exceedingly nice one but, though interesting, it would not be decisive unless the second question were decided in the appellants’ favor. If in fact there were no excessive advances made and the schedule was substantially complied with, that would be the end of the case irrespective of our finding on the first question. We cannot, however, pass on this second question because neither the auditor nor the learned court below made any finding on this question. We see no reason to decide the case piecemeal. In the circumstances we will remand the record to the court below with instructions to reopen the proceedings and refer the matter back to the auditor for further findings on that question and from the action of the court below upon the further report of the auditor; a new appeal may be taken according to law raising both questions.

Appeal No. 63 remanded, costs to abide the event.

Appeal No. 65 dismissed without prejudice.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                              MODERN CONTROLS, INC.

                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE


                                     Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                                        September 30,             September 30,
                                  ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
                                    1996        1995           1996           1995
                                  ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>      
PRIMARY

Average shares outstanding         4,273,513    4,533,920    4,306,192    4,528,794

Net effect of dilutive stock
options - based on the
treasury stock method                 31,299       34,681       30,014       17,601
                                  ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------

Total                              4,304,812    4,568,601    4,336,206    4,546,395
                                  ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========



Net income                        $  804,674   $  719,994   $2,272,982   $1,863,471
                                  ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========


Primary per share amounts         $     0.19   $     0.16   $     0.52   $     0.41
                                  ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========



FULLY DILUTED

Average shares outstanding         4,273,513    4,533,920    4,306,192    4,528,794

Net effect of dilutive stock
options - based on the
treasury stock method                 25,404       33,295       26,228       22,776
                                  ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------

Total                              4,298,917    4,567,215    4,332,420    4,551,570
                                  ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========



Net income                        $  804,674   $  719,994   $2,272,982   $1,863,471
                                  ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========


Fully diluted per share amounts   $     0.19   $     0.16   $     0.52   $     0.41
                                  ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2155 Referred in House (RFH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2155

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 1994

                Referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the 
 cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at 
 Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory 
Authorization Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. FOREST ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY.

    (a) In General.--Subject to the availability of funds appropriated 
under subsection (c), the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the 
Cooperative State Research Service, shall provide the Federal share of 
the cost of planning and constructing a Forest Ecosystem Research 
Laboratory at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share provided under subsection (a) 
shall be 50 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

            Passed the Senate June 29 (legislative day, June 7), 1994.

            Attest:

                                                MARTHA S. POPE,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Latch's Lane Owners Ass’n v. Bazargani 109

01/04/2016

687 MAL (2015)

109

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 116 A.3d 1190
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            4659
<SECURITIES>                                   6440347
<RECEIVABLES>                                    26214
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 20138
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6491358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           626596
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5864762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6491358
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1267932
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1704109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2019322
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2019322
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2019322
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    89.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 09-1548.

#### King Chi Lum, Petitioner v. Kauai County Council, et al.

562 U.S. 839, 131 S. Ct. 200,

178 L. Ed. 2d 44,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5933.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*45Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 860.
2017-1054.

#### State ex rel. Hunter v. Youngstown City School Dist.

In Mandamus. On relator’s application for dismissal. Application granted. Cause dismissed.
#### People v Wellman

1st Dept: 142 AD3d 879

denied*
No. 09-1471.

#### Scott B. Maybee, dba SmartSmoker.com, dba BuycheapCigarettes.com, dba OrderSmokesdirect.com, Petitioner v. Idaho, By and Through Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General.

562 U.S. 835, 131 S. Ct. 150,

178 L. Ed. 2d 37,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6004.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho denied.

Same case below, 148 Idaho 520, 224 P.3d 1109.