alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21.01**

| **NAME**                                                        |   | **STATE OR JURISDICTION OF    INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                 |   |                                                               |
| Deterrence   Acquisition Ltd.                                   |   | UK                                                            |
| GLOBE*trotter*   Software, Inc.                                 |   | California                                                    |
| Macrovision   Europe Limited                                    |   | United   Kingdom                                              |
| Macrovision   International Holding Limited Partnership         |   | Cayman   Islands                                              |
| Macrovision   Israel, Ltd.                                      |   | Israel                                                        |
| Macrovision   Japan and Asia KK                                 |   | Japan                                                         |
| Macrovision   Korea Co., Ltd.                                   |   | Korea                                                         |
| Macrovision   Licensing & Holding B.V.                      |   | Netherlands                                                   |
| Macrovision   Limited (formerly InstallShield Software Limited) |   | United   Kingdom                                              |
| Macrovision   Service Corporation                               |   | Delaware                                                      |
| Macrovision   Taiwan Ltd.                                       |   | Taiwan                                                        |
| Macrovision   UK Limited                                        |   | United   Kingdom                                              |
#### Goldstein, Matter of, v Zabel

1st Dept: 146 AD3d 624

denied
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**KRISTA EVELAND,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 258 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 25th day of October, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
# Hurricane Dorian Fuel Support

/ Published Sept. 6, 2019
ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE, Georgia, 
As Hurricane Dorian moves slowly but dangerously along the East Coast, a DLA Energy team is forward-deployed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Incident Support Base at Robins Air Force Base, Georgia.

The six-person DLA Energy Task Force Americas team has 71 fuel vehicles loaded, staged and ready to respond to FEMA requests for fuel support.

“I am proud to be part of an organization who has volunteers that can deploy at a moment’s notice,” said TFA Commander Army Lt. Col. Julian Perez. “We are ready and partnered with FEMA to support the effects of Hurricane Dorian.”

TFA is a team of first responders who manage FEMA’s contingency fuel contract under the Defense Support of Civil Authorities mission. Four DLA Energy Americas and two DLA Information Operations personnel staff the DLA Mobile Command Vehicle, checking in and inspecting the fuel trucks, which began arriving Aug. 31. TFA is managing/controlling a total of 35 diesel tank wagons, 26 gasoline tank wagons, six propane tank wagons, and four high water vehicles at the ISB.  

“We are tracking recovery efforts in the Bahamas and are prepared to support emerging requirements as requested,” said DLA Energy Americas Commander Army Col. Kevin Cotman.

As Hurricane Dorian passes along the coastline, DLA Energy will conduct facility reporting to obtain Defense Fuel Support Point operational status, continue to monitor supply chains, and mitigate fuel shortfalls as needed.

Until fuel facilities recover from the storm and DLA Energy’s supply chain can resume normal operations, DLA Energy TFA is standing by, ready to respond and support disaster recovery fuel needs.
#### Fiduciary Insurance Company of America, Respondent, v Medical Diagnostic Services, P.C., et al., Defendants, and Star of N.Y. Chiropractic Diagnostic, P.C., Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 20]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered January 6, 2017, which denied defendant Star of N.Y. Chiropractic Diagnostic, P.C.’s (Star) motion for attorneys fees against plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

“It is well settled in New York that a prevailing party may not recover attorneys’ fees from the losing party except where authorized by statute, agreement or court rule” *(U.S. Underwriters Ins. Co. v City Club Hotel, LLC,*3 NY3d 592, 597 [2004]; *see also Gotham Partners, L.P. v High Riv. Ltd. Partnership,*76 AD3d 203, 205 [1st Dept 2010], *lv denied*17 NY3d 713 [2011]). While an insured party may recover attorneys’ fees where it successfully defends against its insurer’s action seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured *(see Underwriters Ins. Co.,*3 NY3d at 597; *Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co.,*47 NY2d 12, 21 [1979]), “[t]he reasoning behind [the award of such attorneys’ fees] is that an insurer’s duty to defend an insured extends to the defense of any action arising out of the occurrence, including a defense against an insurer’s declaratory judgment action” *(Underwriters Ins. Co.,*3 NY3d at 597-598). Here, plaintiff owes defendant *499Star no duty to defend, as Star is merely seeking reimbursement for chiropractic services rendered to the claimant in this no-fault action. While Star was assigned the claimant’s rights for such reimbursement, the claimant was merely the injured party in the taxi at the time of the accident, and plaintiff owed no duty to defend the claimant. Star, as assignee of the claimant’s rights, could acquire no greater rights than its assignor *(see New York & Presbyt. Hosp. v Country-Wide Ins. Co.,*17 NY3d 586, 592 [2011]), and did not acquire any right to a defense from plaintiff. Thus, the court properly held that Star was not entitled to attorneys’ fees in this case.

We have examined Star’s remaining arguments, including its public policy argument, and find them to be unavailing.

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Feinman and Gesmer, JJ.
2017-0191.

#### In re B.O.

Huron App. No. H-16-022, 2017-Ohio-43. Cause accepted and held for decision in 2016-0907, *In re D.S.,*and briefing schedule stayed.

Kennedy, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., dissent.
No. 12-6861.

#### Sexton *v.*Cozner, Superintendent, MacLaren Youth Correctional Facility.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Unique Howard, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 873]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.), rendered July 21, 2015, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Balkin, J.P., Miller, Duffy, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2087

To extend the time period for compliance with the Nutrition Labeling and

Education Act of 1990 for certain food products packaged prior to

August 18, 1994.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 6 (legislative day, MAY 2), 1994

Mr. BUMPERS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To extend the time period for compliance with the Nutrition

Labeling and Education Act of 1990 for certain food

products packaged prior to August 18, 1994.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That before August 18, 1994, sections 403(q) and

4 403(r)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

5 or section 7 of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act

6 of 1990 shall not apply with respect to a food product

7 which is contained in a package for which the label was

8 printed before April 1, 1994, if, before June 15, 1994,

9 the person who introduces or delivers for introduction such
2

S 2087 IS

1 food product into interstate commerce submits to the Sec2 retary of Health and Human Services a certification that

3 such person will comply with this section and will comply

4 with such sections 403(q) and 403(r)(2) after August 18,

5 1994.

Æ
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Re-Exports to Chile (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Re-Exports to Chile (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov   | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ---
|2011                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 2,910 | 0  
|2012                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0  
|2013                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0  
|2014                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0  
|                                                                                                                                 
|2015                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0  
|2016                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   |     |     |     |     |     |       |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Glenn M. Dobbs                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Glenn M. Dobbs                         |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| August 7, 2009                    |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MinesManagement, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit No. 12.

Mountain Fuel Supply Company
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                12 Months Ended
                                                September 30,
                                                    1996        1997
                                                (Dollars in Thousands)
<S>                                             <C>         <C>
Earnings

Income before income taxes                          $41,527     $43,361
Plus debt expense                                    16,683      18,070
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                       251         303
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 224         156
                                                    $58,685     $61,890

Fixed Charges

Debt expense                                        $16,683     $18,070
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                       251         303
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 224         156
                                                    $17,158     $18,529

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                     3.42        3.34
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MSI
HOLDINGS, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AS RESTATED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            8084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   332738
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     185572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2054495
<PP&E>                                         1367249
<DEPRECIATION>                                  426338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2995406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1977816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    5754358
<COMMON>                                       1151857
<OTHER-SE>                                   (6238182)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2995406
<SALES>                                         601629
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                601629
<CGS>                                           501146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   501146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1241030
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              391636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1532183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1532183)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1532183)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)


</TABLE>
# DLA provides mobile hospitals to SOUTHCOM nations for COVID-19 response

/ Published Sept. 9, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency is providing 24 mobile hospitals to the U.S. Southern Command for distribution to 11 countries in its region in support of the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Each field hospital has about 40 beds and is equipped with generators, air conditioning and working space for medical staff. Provided by DLA Troop Support’s Construction and Equipment supply chain through the Humanitarian Assistance Program, the hospitals will be used to support community health-care systems experiencing high volumes of confirmed COVID-19 cases, according to a SOUTHCOM press release.

C&E awarded the contract for the mobile hospitals June 6 through its commercial tent program, and the first three hospitals were donated Aug. 21 from SOUTHCOM to Costa Rica. Close coordination with the manufacturer, customers and the U.S. Transportation Command enabled C&E to rush production and delivery nearly 160 days ahead of schedule, said John Cuorato, chief of C&E’s integrated supply team. 

“These shelters and the equipment associated with them are not stocked. They are made to order, and due to the manufacturer’s multi-location production capabilities, the items are located across the United States,” he said.

U.S. Ambassador Sharon Day said the humanitarian support reinforces the bond between the United States and Costa Rica.

“In times like these, we can only overcome the difficulties we face together as neighbors, communities and governments. We stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Costa Rica during these unprecedented times,” she said during the official donation ceremony.

Additional mobile hospitals will be sent to Jamaica, Ecuador, Chile, Peru, El Salvador, Brazil, Dominican Republic, Panama, Guatemala and Uruguay.

Cuorato said his team is proud to support international efforts and will continue working to deliver the rest of the mobile hospitals as quickly as possible.

“We are performing similar expedited movements, as we did with Costa Rica, for many of the other mobile hospital requirements,” he said. “We are proud to assist our allies with combating COVID-19 as it ravages many countries in the SOUTHCOM [area of operations].”
# NY hospital gets infant bed donation

/ Published Oct. 12, 2020
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
St. Charles Hospital, in Port Jefferson on New York’s Long Island, received five neonatal intensive care-type infant beds in late September via donation from the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services site in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania.

The beds were described as “like new” by Property Disposal Specialist Cindy Anderson, who said the equipment was turned in to DLA for possible reuse, transfer, donation or sale by the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Washington, D.C.

The beds were originally valued at $30,000 apiece, are enclosed and engineered to handle a variety of lifesaving and vital sign monitoring tools typically used in a neonatal intensive care unit.

St. Charles Hospital qualified for the equipment donation through its New York State Agency for Surplus Property and the partnership between DLA and the General Services Administration that allows a variety of non-profit entities to access and request items directly from DLA’s used and surplus inventory list.

St. Charles began as a home for handicapped children in 1909 and was dedicated as a hospital the next year. According to the hospital’s website, “each year, approximately 1,500 babies are born at St. Charles, and a team of Board Certified neonatologists provide 24-hour-a-day coverage to ensure that special needs newborns receive the highest level of care.”
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Garcia, Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 887]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 18, 2001 *(People v Garcia,*284 AD2d 479 [2001]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 26, 1998.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Eng, P.J., Roman, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Georgia Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Georgia Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 2.10   | 2.13   | 2.14   | 2.05   | 2.05   | 1.98   | 1.90  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2.04   | 1.88   | 1.91   | 2.23   | 2.22   | 2.37   | 2.45   | 2.29   | 2.26   | 2.28  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2.15   | 2.07   | 2.03   | 2.13   | 2.10   | 2.10   | 1.97   | 1.89   | 1.88   | 1.85  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.87   | 1.93   | 1.81   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024