alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv4w19



 





Exhibit
4.19


CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

OF

SOVEREIGN CAPITAL TRUST VII




     THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF Sovereign Capital Trust VII (the “Trust”), is being duly executed
and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory
Trust Act, 12 Del.C. §§ 3801, et seq. (the “Act”).


1. NAME. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is Sovereign Capital Trust
VII.


2. RESIDENT TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust
meeting the requirements of Section 3807 of the Act is Bank of New York (Delaware),
502 White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.


3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust will be effective upon filing.


4. COUNTERPARTS. This Certificate of Trust may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts,
each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Certificate of Trust and all of which,
when taken together, shall be deemed to constitute one and the same Certificate of Trust. Any
party to this Certificate of Trust may deliver an executed copy hereof by facsimile transmission to
the other and any such delivery shall have the same force and effect as any other delivery of a
manually signed copy of this Certificate of Trust.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the Trustees of the Trust, have
executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with the Act.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	The Bank of New York,

as Property Trustee

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Mary La Gumina	 
	 	Name:  	Mary
La Gumina	 
	 	Title:  	Vice
President	 
	 
	 	The Bank of New York (Delaware),

as Delaware Trustee

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/
Kristine K. Gullo	 
	 	Name:  	Kristine
K. Gullo	 
	 	Title:  	Vice
President	 
	 
	 	/s/
Thomas R. Brugger	 
	 	Thomas R. Brugger, Administrative Trustee	 
	 
	 	/s/
Thomas D. Cestare
	 	Thomas D. Cestare, Administrative Trustee

	 
	 	/s/
Larry K. Davis
	 	Larry K. Davis, Administrative Trustee
#### Crabapple Corp. et al., Respondents, v Ruben Elberg, Appellant, and Royal One Real Estate, LLC, et al., Respondents.

[60 NYS3d 124]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered January 21, 2016, which, to the extent appealled from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants-respondents’ (the LLCs) motion to remove defendant Ruben Elberg (Elberg) as their co-manager and fiduciary, unanimously reversed, without costs, the motion denied, and the matter remanded to *435Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with this decision.

Elberg asserts that he is the sole managing member of the LLCs. His sister, nonparty Tamara Pewzner (Pewzner), asserts that their father, Jacob Elberg (Jacob), deceased, was the sole owner of the LLCs and that she is the LLCs co-manager by virtue of her status as the co-executor, along with Elberg, of Jacob’s estate. By virtue of that authority, Pewzner moved in the name of the LLCs to remove Ruben as a co-manager of the defendant entities, asserting, inter alia, that he had breached his fiduciary duties.

Contrary to his contention, Elberg was not removed as the sole “managing member” of the LLCs. The record demonstrates that he was a 40% minority member, not a managing member with the power to act unilaterally on the LLCs’ behalf. The relevant agreements contained no provision regarding the succession of management of the LLCs in the event of the death of Jacob, the majority member. Thus, Jacob’s controlling interest in the LLCs passed to his estate upon his death, and Elberg and Pewzner, the co-executors of the estate, had the authority to act as co-managers of the LLCs (Limited Liability Company Law § 608; *see also Yew Prospect v Szulman,*305 AD2d 588, 589 [2d Dept 2003]). Limited Liability Company Law § 608 provides that the executor of a deceased member “may exercise *all*of the member’s rights for the purpose of settling his or her estate” (emphasis added).

In view of the foregoing, Elberg’s reliance on the business judgment rule is misplaced *(see Matter of Levandusky v One Fifth Ave. Apt. Corp.,*75 NY2d 530, 537-538 [1990]). As he was never the “sole manager” of the LLCs, the business judgment of the LLCs was never his to exercise unilaterally. However, given the conflicting submissions as to the rights of the parties vis-a-vis the LLCs and LPs, as well as whether completing the project or accepting the buyout was the best course of action, the motion court acted prematurely when it granted the motion to remove Elberg as co-manager without holding an evi-dentiary hearing *(see Alpert v 28 Williams St. Corp.,*91 AD2d 530 [1st Dept 1982]; *see also Lehey v Goldburt,*90 AD3d 410 [1st Dept 2011]). Questions of fact exist as to whether movants are entitled to the relief they seek *(see Colucci v Canastra,*130 AD3d 1268, 1269 [3d Dept 2015] [“questions of fact preclude summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s removal as a director and officer”]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias and Gesmer, JJ.
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|California Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Acquifers (Count)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|California Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Acquifers (Count)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Com. v. Herriott

04/12/2016

481 WAL (2014)

Denied

Pa.Super., 107 A.3d 234
No. 12-8810.

#### Ahumada-Rodriguez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
159 A.3d 887

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GARY L. ERVIN, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 1, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

              Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-47834) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Stock
Option Plan, 2000 Director Option Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
Synplicity, Inc. of our report dated January 18, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Synplicity, Inc. included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                          /S/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 22, 2002
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|Price of Jacksonville, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Price of Jacksonville, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov   | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ---
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 10.79 |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
----

----

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Doron Moshe    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Doron Moshe             |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                    |   |

----

----
#### Com. v. Ware

11/02/2015

158 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 389
#### Com. v. Rehm

03/30/2016

974 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 500
#### Kittle, Matter of, v D’Amico

3d Dept: 141 AD3d 991

denied
# 51st Civil Engineer Squadron Conducts Airfield Damage Repair Training

/ Published Sept. 17, 2019
OSAN AIR BASE, Republic of Korea, 
Generally, at the center of Air Force installation operations is the airfield and the runway, heavily guarded by law enforcement and surveillance to keep people and assets safe.Which leaves the question: what would happen if Osan Air Base’s runway was somehow left damaged?It is the responsibility of the 51st Civil Engineer Squadron to make accurate and timely repairs. In preparation for similar scenarios, the squadron held their biannual rapid airfield damage recovery training Sept. 9-13, 2019.“This training is designed to demonstrate our ability to rapidly repair our airfield after it’s been damaged,” said Tech. Sgt. David Rodgers, 51st CES pavements and equipment craftsman.On a normal working day, the 51st CES’ “Dirt Boyz”, or heavy equipment operators, are the only ones that work with machinery like front loaders and excavators. But when the time comes for RADR training, every Airman in the squadron is trained on multiple pieces of heavy machinery.“The training is good for us because it’s CE putting it on for CE,” said Senior Airman Brandon Beltran, 51st CES heating, ventilation and air conditioning technician. “Each one of our individual crafts are assigned a specific piece of equipment and if anything were to happen to the runway, the goal is to jump into any piece of equipment and know how to use it to get the job done.”When an airfield is damaged, these Airmen are able to get the airfield functional again in under eight hours by conducting field assessments, gathering their necessary equipment and venturing out to repair the damage caused to ensure mission readiness once again.“Generally, in a real world scenario, our engineering assistants would do damage assessment of the airfield,” Rodgers said. “Once everyone has done their necessary checks, we gather our equipment and head out and start working on the repairs.”In addition to their own individual training, members of the 554th Rapid Engineer Deployable Heavy Operational Repair Squadron assigned to Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, were also there to instruct members throughout the training and provide feedback on how to improve the process.“We bring instructors out to ensure our proficiency while training with equipment and material that isn’t used every day,” said Maj. Branden DeLong, 51st CES operations flight commander. “The mission is always our first priority, but it’s also an opportunity to get time in some great equipment. [This training] creates an environment where everyone wants to get the job done and showcases Osan’s abilities to bring the airfield back to operational as quickly as possible”.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command website.*
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30228-30229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14723]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 29, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Larch Bancorporation, Inc., Larchwood, Iowa; to merge with 
Exchange State Bancorporation, Inc., Hills, Minnesota, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Exchange State Bank of Hills, Hills, Minnesota.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. Union Planters Corporation, Memphis, Tennessee, and its wholly 
owned subsidiary, Union Planters Holding Corporation, Memphis, 
Tennessee; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Transflorida 
Bank, Boca Raton, Florida.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. AmCorp Financial, Inc., Ardmore, Oklahoma; to acquire 100 
percent of the

[[Page 30229]]

voting shares of First State Bank, Morton, Texas. In addition the 
bank's main office will be relocated to Keller, Texas, and the bank 
will be renamed American Bank, Keller, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 29, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-14723 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maverick Mahore, Defendant.

[52 NYS3d 627]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Stolz, J.), rendered August 20, 2014, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur— Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Southwest Bancorporation of Texas, Inc. and Subsidiary on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-21619, 333-27891, 333-33533, and 333-55685) of our reports, dated February
12, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Southwest Bancorporation of Texas, Inc. and Subsidiary as
of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997
and 1996, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-47995) of our reports dated February 12, 1999, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
of Southwest Bancorporation of Texas, Inc. and Subsidiary. We also consent to
the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts".


                                               PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
March 4, 1999
#### State of New York, Matter of, v Keith F.

1st Dept: 149 AD3d 671

denied*

*

 Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic or denied.
#### DeStefano, Matter of, v Borkowski

2d Dept: 153 AD3d 817

denied
FILED

December 10, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

MAY SESSION, 1997

KEITH SCARBROUGH, ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9607-CC-00322

)

Appellant, )

)

) CHEATHAM COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. ROBERT E. BURCH. JUDGE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

)

Appellee. ) (Post Conviction - Sentencing)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

Keith Scarbrough Pro Se John Knox Walkup

R.M.S.I. Attorney General and Reporter

7475Cockrill Bend-Industrial Rd.

Nashville, TN 37209-1010 Peter M. Coughlan

Assistant Attorney General

450 James Robertson Parkway

Nashville, TN 37243

Dan Alsobrooks

District Attorney General

James W. Kirby

Assistant District Attorney

105 Sycamore Street

Ashland City, TN 37015

OPINION FILED ________________________

AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
-2-

OPINION

In this appeal of the summary dismissal of his post-conviction petition

Appellant, Keith Scarbrough, asks this Court to review the validity of his

conviction entered upon his pleas of guilty onFeburary 27, 1986. Appellant pled

guilty to armed robbery, grand larceny, and second degree burglary. As part of

the plea agreement Appellant received sentences totaling11 years. 

Although acknowledging his post-conviction petition was time-barred under

the three year statute of limitations in effect when his conviction became final,

Appellant argues that the enactment on May 10, 1995, of the new one year

statute of limitations for post-conviction petitions creates a new one year period

in which he may file for post-conviction relief. Our State Supreme Court has only

recently resolved this issue adversely to Appellant’s position. Carter v. State,

Monroe Co., No. 03-S-01-9612-CR-00117 (Tenn. S. Ct. September 8, 1997, at

Knoxville). Thus the petition for post-conviction relief was properly dismissed.

Accordingly, the judgm ent of the trial court is affirmed in all respects

pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

____________________________________

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
-3-

CONCUR:

___________________________________

PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUDGE

___________________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE
Exhibit 10.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Elbit Systems Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-9354) pertaining to
the employees stock option plan of our report dated March 24, 2003, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Elbit Systems Ltd. and subsidiaries
included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2004.

                                         /s/   Luboshitz Kasierer
                                         ------------------------
                                               Luboshitz Kasierer
                              An Affiliate Member of Ernst & Young International


Haifa, Israel, June 27, 2005
No. 09-1495.

#### John Van Salisbury, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

562 U.S. 837, 131 S. Ct. 159,

178 L. Ed. 2d 39,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5832.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 310.