alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1513]



[[Page 3326]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than February 17, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Cornhusker Growth Corporation, Lincoln, Nebraska; to acquire 
Johnston Growth Corporation, Johnston, Iowa, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Johnston Charter Bank, Johnston, Iowa, a de novo organization, 
pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(4) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 16, 
1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-1513 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
No. 09-1324.

#### Roland C. Mracek, Petitioner v. Bryn Mawr Hospital, et al.

562 U.S. 829, 131 S. Ct. 82,

178 L. Ed. 2d 27,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6725.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 925.
# Having their pi and eating it too

/ Published March 20, 2019
Battle Creek, Michigan, 
Runners from the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center and Battle Creek’s Michigan Air National Guard Base tracked the numbers in their time March 14 as they honored one of the world’s most famous numbers -- 3.14.

A 2018 Time magazine article notes that people have found many ways to have fun while celebrating National Pi Day since the House of Representatives chose to create it in 2009. Some have dressed like Albert Einstein, who shares his birthday with the event, while others enjoy circular treats like pie. After all, pi is the number used to figure the area of circle. 

While it was the third Pi Day run for the Federal Center, Sports and Fitness Facility Manager Martha Kerns said it was  the first time pie was offered to those who ran and the first time to try a group run instead of just having virtual runs. The virtual runs allow participants to complete the 3.14 on their own and submit the time, but this year was also the time attempt to include an event at the base where people could run a course together in the afternoon.

“We wanted to do something different,” Kerns said, “but the weather made that difficult.”

Severe weather warnings for the afternoon caused the group run to be cancelled. The 27 runners were left with the option to run on their own, indoors or outside, and send in their time as usual. Employees with mobility issues were able to participate riding stationary bikes or using an elliptical machine.  

“Virtual runs help the telework employees to participate as well,” Kerns said.

The top male finisher was Tech. Sgt. James Vandenberg with a time of 21.40 while the Federal Center’s Amber Smoker had the fastest time at 29.53 for female participants. 

“They got to share bragging rights and pie after the run,” Kerns said.

A new sponsorship from a local vendor allowed the Federal Center’s Morale, Welfare and Recreation program to offer slices of cherry and apple pie. For more information on the event, see the post on the MWR Facebook page.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc. and
subsidiaries as of January 31, 2000 and for the year then ended and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,266
<SECURITIES>                                       548
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                       841
<INVENTORY>                                     20,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,699
<PP&E>                                         239,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,313
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,915
<SALES>                                        832,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               832,709
<CGS>                                          787,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  804,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   353
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,808
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,753
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,055
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6576

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NELSON EDDY WALKER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-91, CA-01-845) Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 10, 2002 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nelson Eddy Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Nelson Eddy Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Walker , Nos CR-97-91; CA-01- 845 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 09-1376.

#### Angel Enrique Villeda Aldana, et al., Petitioners v. Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc., dba Del Monte Fresh Produce Company, et al.

562 U.S. 831, 131 S. Ct. 102,

178 L. Ed. 2d 29,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6170.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 578 F.3d 1283.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated February 12, 1998 (except with respect to the
stock split discussed in Note 14 as to which the date is March 31, 1998)
included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements, File Nos. 333-29681 and 333-32083. It should be noted that we have
not audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to December 31,
1997 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 31, 1998
#### Kirkpatrick v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs, State Bd. of Barber Examiners.

12/08/2015

539 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 117 A.3d 1286
2016-1890.

#### State v. Williams.

Lorain App. No. 16CA010900, 2016-Ohio-7345.

O’Neill, J., dissents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0261

IN THE MATTER OF:

J.D.L.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Following entry of this Court’s April 11, 2023 Opinion reversing the 

commitment order in this case, Respondent and Appellant J.D.L. has 

moved for immediate remittitur. J.D.L. represents that the State of 

Montana does not oppose this motion. Good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that remittitur shall issue immediately.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 13 2023

04/13/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0261
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 23, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Republic Bancshares, Inc., St. Petersburg, Florida; to acquire 
Lochaven Federal Savings and Loan Association, Winter Park, Florida, 
and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to 
Sec.  225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 3, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15164 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3362-3363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., Common Stock, 
Without Par Value) File No. 1-8503

January 15, 1998.
    Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an 
application with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to 
withdraw the above specified security (``Security'') from listing and 
registration on the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or ``Exchange'').
    The reasons cited in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    The Security of the Company currently is listed for trading on both 
the PCX and the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''). The Company 
has complied with the rules of the PCX for delisting its Security by 
filing with the Exchange a request for delisting, together with a 
certified copy of the board resolution authorizing the delisting from 
the PCX, and by setting forth in detail to the Exchange the reasons and 
facts supporting the proposed withdrawal.

[[Page 3363]]

    In making the decision to withdraw its Security from listing on the 
PCX, the Company considered the expense of maintaining the dual-listing 
of its Security on the PCX and the NYSE. The Company does not see any 
particular advantage in the dual-listing of its Security, since trading 
in the Security on the PCX has come to represent a very small portion 
of the Company's total trading volume.
    By letter dated December 5, 1997, the PCX informed the Company that 
it had no objection to the withdrawal of the Company's Security from 
listing on the PCX.
    By reason of Section 12(b) of the Act and the rules thereunder, the 
Company shall continue to be obligated to file reports under Section 13 
of the Act with the Commission and the NYSE.
    Any interested person may, on or before February 5, 1998, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
Exchange and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1490 Filed 1-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
161 A.3d 760

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. CHRISTINE DILLARD, M.V.C., DEFENDANT.

March 9, 2017

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion of Clinton C. Barlow for leave to file a motion for leave to appeal as within time (M-767) is granted.
#### Link v. Link

10/27/2015

181 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 369
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2994

_____________________________
K ENYANNA R ACQUEL C HEEKS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark Borello , Judge

. April 9, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. Kenyanna Racquel Cheeks seeks relief from her judgment and sentence for sale of cocaine and solicitation for prostitution . Ms. Cheeks argues that the evidence was insufficient to overcome her defense of entrapment, the trial court erroneously overruled a n objection to the admission of a jail call, and the trial court improperly imposed a discretionary fine pursuant to section 775.083, Florida Statutes, and a surcharge pursuant to section 938.04, Florida Statutes. We reject the first two arguments without comment. However, we agree with the State’s concession that the trial court erred when it included the discretionary fine and surcharge in the written judgment and sentence because neither was orally imposed at sentencing

. Lamoreaux v. State

, 88 So. 3d 379, 381 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Accordingly, we strike the2 $5,000 fine and $250 surcharge and remand for entry of a corrected judgment and sentence consistent with this opinion. Id. ; see also Calhoun v. State , 259 So. 3d 288, 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)

.
A FFIRMED in part
, R EVERSE D in part
, and R EMANDED with directions

.
R AY , K ELSEY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee

, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                              5
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                    2,032,000
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                            27,375,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              1,780,000
<INVENTORY>                              30,981,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         61,572,000
<PP&E>                                   78,827,000
<DEPRECIATION>                         (29,467,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          134,726,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    35,477,000
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      5,000
<OTHER-SE>                             (18,098,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            134,726,000
<SALES>                                 150,132,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        150,132,000
<CGS>                                   105,020,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           105,020,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         30,299,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       12,006,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           2,736,000
<INCOME-TAX>                              1,146,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       1,590,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                              1,590,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  3.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3.30
        


</TABLE>
163 A.3d 870

#### IN THE MATTER OF JONATHAN G. BURNHAM, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

June 29, 2017

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-320, recommending on the record certified to the Board pursuant to *Rule*1:20-4(f)(default by respondent), that JONATHAN G. BURNHAM, formerly of GLEN GARDNER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, be disbarred for violating *RPC*1.1(a)(gross neglect), *RPC*1.3 (lack of diligence) *RPC*1.4(b)(failure to keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter), *RPC*1.15(a)(knowing misappropriation of client funds), *RPC*1.15(b) (failure to safeguard funds), *RPC*1.16(d)(failure to protect client’s interests after termination of representation), *RPC*8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and *RPC*8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and the principles of *In re Wilson,*81 *N.J.*451, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979) and *In re Hollendonner,*102 *N.J.*21, 504 A.2d 1174 (1985);

And JONATHAN G. BURNHAM having failed to appear on the Order directing him to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JONATHAN G. BURNHAM be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that JONATHAN G. BURNHAM be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained *511by JONATHAN G. BURNHAM pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JONATHAN G. BURNHAM comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.
164 A.3d 405

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MICHAEL N. BRIGHT (A/K/A MICHAEL MCNNAIR), DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 23, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-l642/3480-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.