alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Employee thanked for helping homeless vets

/ Published Jan. 6, 2020
WARNER ROBBINS, Georgia, 
A Defense Logistics Agency employee at a Georgia site was honored recently by the Veterans Affairs for his effort assisting their staff in getting useable items to homeless veterans who can really use them.

                Operations Chief Willie Mitchell (right) presents Disposal Service Representative Dave Smith with a plaque from Veterans Affairs for helping the agency find usable items to aid homeless vets.                            Helping those in need                            Operations Chief Willie Mitchell (right) presents Disposal Service Representative Dave Smith with a plaque from Veterans Affairs for helping the agency find usable items to aid homeless vets.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Warner Robbins staffVIRIN: 191217-D-D0441-003 Disposal Service Representative Dave Smith at DLA Disposition Services at Warner Robins received a nice glass plaque from the VA for his work helping the agency. Smith said “homeless vets also get cold weather clothing, sleeping bags and field packs from us.” Usable items like those Smith mentioned and others like blankets and canteens are often presented at events like “VA stand downs” that help educate the vets on the variety or government and private organizations in their area that can assist them.

Smith efforts are part of a strong partnership between DLA Disposition Services and the VA for decades. In fact, when the first website went online to allow eligible customers to search for usable property, the VA was among the first to search the global inventory. Members of the initial website team remember the VA staff located a large quantity of men’s underwear that was acquired to meet a common need among homeless vets.

                After learning about resources, veterans receive surplus military items provided to Veterans Affairs from DLA Disposition Services.                            Finding useful items                            After learning about resources, veterans receive surplus military items provided to Veterans Affairs from DLA Disposition Services.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Tim HoyleVIRIN: 180615-D-BV668-001Smith’s plaque came to him from the VA Greater LA Homeless Outreach Program with “heartfelt gratitude for your loyalty and support of the military veterans of the greater Los Angeles area. We are appreciative.” The award was presented to Smith by Operations Chief Willie Mitchell.
---

---

# Exhibit 15.6

CONSENT

We hereby consent to the reference to
our valuation of Series A Debentures of Plaza Centers N.V. as of December 31
2008 and 2007 in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852 and No.
333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd.

This consent is not to be construed
as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to
be filed with the Annual Report under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.

|/s/
 Financial Immunities Ltd.
|--------------------------------------------

Rehovot, Israel 
June 25, 2009



---

---
Exhibit 23.1



                          Independent Auditor's Consent


The Board of Directors
NACT Telecommunications, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statement  (No.
333-36899)  on Form S-8 of NACT  Telecommunications,  Inc.  of our report  dated
December 4, 1997,  relating to the  balance  sheets of NACT  Telecommunications,
Inc. as of September  30, 1997 and 1996,  and the related  statements of income,
stockholders'  equity,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the three  year
period ended September 30, 1997, and related  schedule,  which report appears in
the September 30, 1997 Form 10K of NACT Telecommunications, Inc.



/S/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
-------------------------
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
December 24, 1997
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.72

      Shareholder's Voting Rights Proxy Agreement-Participation Letter of Fuzhou
                                                                          Fukesi

                   ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER FOR PARTICIPATION OF
                   SHAREHOLDERS' VOTING RIGHTS PROXY AGREEMENT

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERTISEMENT CO., LTD., (registered address: Room 1003 F,
No.1027, Changning Road, Changning District, Shanghai) (hereinafter the
"PARTICIPATING SHAREHOLDER"), and FUZHOU FUKESI ADVERTISING CO., LTD.
(registered address: Floor 18, Xinduhui Garden Plaza, No. 171 Wuyi Road (N),
Gulou District, Fuzhou) (hereinafter the "PARTICIPATED TARGET COMPANY"), as
independent party, hereby agree to participate in the Shareholders' Voting
Rights Proxy Agreement among Focus Media Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
(hereinafter "FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY"), Shanghai Focus Media Advertisement Co.,
Ltd. and other relevant parties (hereinafter the "PROXY AGREEMENT") dated March
28 2005. Participating Shareholder and Participated Target Company agree to
entrust the Trustees designated by Focus Media Technology to exercise the voting
rights in Participated Target Company in respect of 70% of the equity interest
in the registered capital of Participated Target Company held by the
Participating Shareholder as of the date of this Acknowledgement Letter, on
behalf of Participating Shareholder.

Once this Acknowledgement Letter is executed by the Participating Shareholder
and Participated Target Company, Participating Shareholder and Participated
Target Company shall be deemed to have made the same undertakings and warranties
with those of the Shareholders and Target Companies under the Proxy Agreement
(to the extent that is related and applicable to Participating Shareholder and
Participated Target Company), agreed to respectively perform the obligations of
the Shareholders and Target Companies stipulated in the Proxy Agreement (to the
extent that is related and applicable to Participating Shareholder and
Participated Target Company), and acknowledged the rights and obligations of the
Parties under the Proxy Agreement.

<PAGE>

      Shareholder's Voting Rights Proxy Agreement-Participation Letter of Fuzhou
                                                                          Fukesi

                                [EXECUTION PAGE]

SHANGHAI FOCUS MEDIA ADVERISEMENT CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              ---------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006

FUZHOU FUKESI ADVERTISING CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              ---------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006

FOCUS MEDIA TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.
(Company chop)

Signature by: /s/ Jason Nanchun Jiang
              ---------------------------
Name: Jason Nanchun Jiang
Position: Authorized Representative
Date: May 22, 2006
#### John Quealy Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, Appellant, v AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

[58 NYS3d 26]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered on or about April 14, 2016, which, to the extent ap-pealable, denied plaintiff’s motion to vacate an order entered, upon default, granting defendant’s motion to vacate the note of issue and dismiss the complaint for failure to provide discovery, unanimously reversed, on the facts, and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, with costs, the motion granted, *593and the matter remanded for a determination on the merits of defendant’s motion to strike the complaint. Appeal from so much of the April 2016 order as granted defendant’s motion for sanctions against plaintiff, deemed an appeal from judgment, entered August 11, 2016, awarding defendant sanctions, and, so considered, said judgment unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, and the judgment vacated. Order, same court and Justice, entered on or about November 9, 2015, declaring plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment moot, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, and the declaration vacated.

The motion court improvidently exercised its discretion in sua sponte granting, on default, defendant’s motion to strike the complaint. Plaintiff’s papers filed in motion sequence No. 1 were also “in opposition to defendant’s . . . motion seeking the striking of the note of issue” (mot sequence No. 2), and did address defendant’s argument concerning its failure to respond to discovery requests by arguing that no discovery was required under the circumstances. Considered on the merits, the motion should have been granted only to the extent of compelling plaintiff to respond to defendant’s discovery requests. To the extent plaintiff may be deemed to have defaulted by failing to file opposition papers in motion sequence No. 2 or to address more extensively the substance of the motion to strike, its default was reasonably excusable, given the two motion sequences addressing similar issues, and it has shown a meritorious defense against the drastic sanction of striking the complaint, namely, that it did not fail to comply with any discovery orders, because defendant never made any motion to compel discovery *(see Siegman v Rosen,*270 AD2d 14, 15 [1st Dept 2000]). Under these circumstances, the court improvidently failed to vacate the default judgment *(see Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp.,*100 NY2d 62, 68 [2003]).

As plaintiff’s motion to vacate was not frivolous, we reverse the order awarding monetary sanctions based on its making the motion.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.
No. 12-875.

#### Hovem et al. *v.*Klein Independent School District.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 09-1364.

#### Seeta Persaud, Petitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al.

562 U.S. 830, 131 S. Ct. 95,

178 L. Ed. 2d 28,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6435.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
#### In the Matter of Samuel Encarnacion, Petitioner, v Richard J. Price, Respondent.

[48 NYS3d 599]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Kapnick, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             283
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,764
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,236
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           8,565
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             8,565
<LOANS>                                         32,605
<ALLOWANCE>                                        467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,438
<DEPOSITS>                                      40,728
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                565
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,815
<OTHER-SE>                                       (670)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  51,438
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,132
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  474
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   314
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,920
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,024
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,024
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              896
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      467
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (602)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (602)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (602)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.57
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      9
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  467
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            467


</TABLE>
2015-1717.

#### State ex rel. Tolle v. Spherion of Mid-Ohio, Inc.

Franklin App. No. 14AP-717, 2015-Ohio-3593. On request for oral argument. Request denied.
164 A.3d 410

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MATTHEW BUMPERS (A/K/A MATHEW BUMPERS AND CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON), DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 23, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

*620A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas LNG Imports (Price) From Peru (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas LNG Imports (Price) From Peru (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.68   | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     -----------------------------------------------------------------------

         I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Morgan's Foods, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
             ended August 17, 2003, (the "Report"), which this certification
             accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
             of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.




                              /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and
                              Chief Executive Officer
October 1, 2003


                                       17
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14466]



[[Page 29995]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Security for the Protection of the Public Indemnification of 
Passengers for Nonperformance of Transportation; Notice of Issuance of 
Certificate (Performance)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
certificate of Financial Responsibility for Indemnification of 
Passengers for Nonperformance of Transportation pursuant to the 
provisions of Section 3, Public Law 89-777 (46 U.S.C. Sec. 817(e)) and 
the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 C.F.R. 
Part 540, as amended:

American Canadian Caribbean Line, Inc., 461 Water Street, P.O. Box 368, 
Warren, RI 02885
Vessel: Grande Mariner
Manhattan Cruises, LLC, 444 Madison Avenue, Suite 401, New York, NY 
10022
Vessel: Superstar Capricorn
New Commodore Cruise Lines Limited, 4000 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 385 
South, Hollywood, FL 33021
Vessel: Universe Explorer
New SeaEscape Cruises Ltd., Cruise Charter Ltd. and Maritime Management 
Ltd., 140 South Federal Highway, Dania, FL 33004
Vessel: Island Adventure
Norwegian Cruise Line Limited (d/b/a Norwegian Cruise Line), 7665 
Corporate Center Drive, Miami, FL 33126
Vessel: Norwegian Sky
Princess Cruises, Inc., Princess Cruise Lines, Inc. and The Peninsular 
and Oriental Steam Navigation Company, 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 
1800, Los Angeles, CA 90067
Vessel: Ocean Princess
Thomson Holidays Limited, Greater London House, Hampstead Road, London 
NW1 7SD, England
Vessel: The Topaz
Windjammer Barefoot Cruises, Ltd., 1759 Bay Road, Miami, FL 33139-1413
Vessel: Legacy
The World of ResidenSea Ltd., 630 Fifth Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, 
NY 10011
Vessel: The World of Residensea

    Dated: May 27, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14466 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of APT Satellite Holdings Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ni
Yifeng, Executive Director and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2006

/s/ NI YIFENG
Ni Yifeng
Executive Director and President
APT Satellite Holdings Limited
2005 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 5-18-2005 

# In Re: Ge n D at a comm P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 04-1710

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2005 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" I n Re: Ge n D at a c omm " (2005). 2005 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1087. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005/1087UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

G E N E R A L D A T A C O MM IN D U S T R IE S , IN C .,

A p p e llan t,
v. J A M E S R . A R C A R A e t a l.,

A pp el l ees. N o. 04- 1710

OR DE R A M E NDI NG T HE OP I NI ON

M ay___, 2005. I t i s h e r e b y O R D E R E D t h a t the concurring opinion in the above-ca ptioned case shall be ame nd e d s uc h th at th e la st s e nte nc e of thec on c ur ri ngop ini on

sh a ll r e a d: “ Ac c or din g ly , I c on c ur in judgme nt of the cour

t, subject to the small reser vation noted in footnote 14, su pra .”

L ou i s H . P oll ak, J Dated: Ma

y 18, 2005