alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. .'1350

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. '1350,I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Pierre Foods, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 3,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /S/ NORBERT E.  WOODHAMS |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Norbert E.  Woodhams     |
| October 18,  2005   |

 

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. '1350,I, the undersigned Principal Financial Officer of Pierre Foods, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarter ended September 3, 2005 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /S/ JOSEPH W.  MEYERS  |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Joseph W. Meyers       |
| October 18,  2005 |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2290 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2290

 To repeal the increase in withholding from supplemental wage payments 
          included in the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 15 (legislative day, July 11), 1994

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the increase in withholding from supplemental wage payments 
          included in the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF INCREASED WITHHOLDING ON SUPPLEMENTAL WAGE 
              PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 13273 of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 
1993 (Public Law 103-66) is repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to payments made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 09-9705.

#### Lorenzo Stevens, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 842, 131 S. Ct. 70,

178 L. Ed. 2d 49,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5850.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

Same case below, 47 Cal. 4th 625, 101 Cal. Rptr. 3d 14, 218 P.3d 272.
# Energy partners in FEMA Readiness Drill

/ Published Nov. 12, 2019
FORT BUCHANAN, Puerto Rico, 
Preparing for the next presidential disaster declarations, Defense Logistics Agency Energy and the Federal Emergency Management Agency held a readiness drill at Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico, Sept. 11.  

“The purpose of the drill was to demonstrate our ability to support delivery of ground fuel products to designated locations,” said DLA Energy Contracting Officer Georgia Dotson. “These drills are carefully planned to ensure the capability is tested and evaluated in all FEMA regions covering all fifty U.S. states and territories.”

FEMA selects the location and timing of up to two readiness drills per year. This joint exercise scenario kicked off on Sept. 9 with simulated flooding created by a hurricane striking Puerto Rico. The scenario called for a four to eight inches of rain accumulation across the island, impacting river levels and creating flash floods and mudslides.

A formal interagency agreement for logistical support between DLA and FEMA is reviewed annually. As the executive agent for Class III products, petroleum, oil and lubricants, DLA Energy provides support to FEMA through its multipurpose fuel contingency contract with a designated fuel contractor.

“These readiness drills are extremely beneficial because they provide an opportunity for the key players to get together to practice,” Dotson explained. “So, if and when we are called upon, we are ready and at the top of our game.” 

DLA Energy’s role included activation of the FEMA contingency fuel contract, ordering fuel trucks and 2,000 gallons of diesel fuel from the designated contingency contractor responsible for Puerto Rico, and providing representatives to evaluate contractor performance.Brian Hill, a DLA Energy Americas East quality assurance representative, advised exercise participants during the drill.

“My role was to provide fuel support guidance to the FEMA Region II personnel who were on hand to evaluate the contingency contractor perform tank truck-to-tank wagon resupply and multiple retail operations,” Hill said. “The readiness exercise allows both FEMA and DLA Energy the opportunity to evaluate the contractor and answer/clarify any uncertainties in contract requirements.”

Over the last year, there were 94 disaster declarations according to FEMA’s disaster declaration website. A disaster declaration occurs when a regional area’s senior public official,   (mayor, county judge or governor), issues a formal statement that a disaster or emergency situation exceeds their response capabilities. 

“This exercise required a lot of planning and coordination between DLA Energy and FEMA officials, and reinforced the importance of good communication between the DLA Energy Direct Delivery Fuels division and the contingency contractors,” Dotson said. “It provided a great opportunity to train newly assigned personnel in customer operations for future disasters and contingency operations.”
# Admiral visits Wright-Patt clinic to thank Airmen

/ Published Oct. 8, 2021
WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Ohio , 
Rear Adm. Kristen Fabry visited Wright-Patterson Medical Center on Oct. 1 to thank the 88th Medical Group Airmen who provided active duty and civilians at Defense Supply Center Columbus with the COVID-19 vaccine earlier this year.

The Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime commander was shown the COVID and flu vaccine point-of-dispensing operations in the Medical Center’s auditorium and met with most of the 11 Airmen who made up the team that went to Columbus.

“I was on travel when you guys came down there,” Fabry said. “So I wanted to make sure to come out and thank you today for everything you all have done and continue to do. The journey continues on this.

“It really speaks to your team’s agility and willingness to step in and support and help out your sister installation over there in Columbus. So thank you again for taking care of our patients and all of our civil service and military folks. I can’t thank you enough for that and being willing to team with us because you certainly had enough work here.”

After meeting with the Airmen, Fabry recounted the situation she was facing at the time.

“It’s hard to imagine now, but way back in February and March, we were trying to figure out how to get vaccines out to our folks,” she said.  

She was concerned for her first responders, a fire department and police force, as well as engineers who were working in a base lab and could not telework.

The admiral said she was also aware Wright-Patt was 70 miles away and the vaccine needed to be kept cold.

“This team was so willing to work with us and figure out a way to say yes,” Fabry said. “I can’t thank this team enough for looking at all the complexities of that and still saying, ‘We can do this, we can make it happen.’”

Col. Christian Lyons, 88th MDG commander, voiced pride in his Airmen.

“I think it is a testament to our mighty medics, the fact that we’re able to extend our reach and provide trusted care outside the walls of our Medical Center,” he said. “We have extended our reach to protect our community and our population by projecting our medical force to when and where any portions of the (Defense Department) and our executive branch partners need our assistance. And I’m very proud of the team for that.”
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Laino, Appellant.

[55 NYS3d 664]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (DiDomenico, J.), rendered June 28, 2016, convicting him of attempted assault in the third degree and harassment in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence supporting his convictions was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]; *People v Santos,*86 NY2d 869, 870 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d *622342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the fact-finder’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe their demeanor *(see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, without merit.

Rivera, J.P., Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
164 A.3d 401

#### TATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AND TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN, PLAINTIFF-CROSS-RESPONDENTS, AND COUNTY OF HUNTERDON, PLAINTIFF-CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. QUAKER VALLEY FARMS, LLC AND DAVID DEN HOLLANDER, DEFENDANTS-CROSS-PETITIONERS.

March 16, 2017

ON CROSS PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A cross-petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the cross-petition for certification is granted.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

[COMPANY LETTERHEAD]


                              CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
                                    ADDENDUM


         This Amendment (this "Amendment") to Consultant Agreement dated May 21,
2001 is made this 30th day of December 2002 between eResearchTechnology, Inc.
("Company") and Joel Morganroth ("Executive").

         Company and Executive are parties to a certain Consultant Agreement
dated May 21, 2001 (the "Agreement"). Company and Executive now desire to amend
a certain provision of the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment, to become
effective on January 1, 2003.

         Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, Company and Executive, each intending to be legally
bound hereby, agree as follows:

1. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         1.1 Section 3. a) is hereby amended and restated to read in its
entirety as follows:

             Base fees shall be $228,000/year payable in twelve equal
             installments of $19,000 by the 15th of each month. Consultant will
             be eligible for incentive compensation to be determined by the
             Board of Directors.

2. Miscellaneous

         2.1 All references to the Agreement in any documents and instruments
executed by the parties in connection with the Agreement shall be deemed to
refer to the Agreement as the same has been amended through the date hereof, and
as the same may be amended in the future.

         2.2 This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and
each such counterpart shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts
shall constitute but one and the same agreement.

         2.3 The Agreement and this Amendment may be modified or amended by the
parties hereto only by a written agreement executed by both parties.

         2.4 Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions
of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified
and confirmed in every aspect.

         2.5 This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the internal laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, without regard to
conflicts of laws principles.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to be
executed on the date first written above.


By:  /s/ Joel Morganroth       By:  /s/ Bruce Johnson
     ---------------------          --------------------------------------------
     Joel Morganroth                Bruce Johnson
                                    Title:  Sr. Vice President & Chief Financial
                                               Officer
#### In the Matter of Craig L., Jr., an Infant. Herkimer County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Craig L., Sr., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 770]

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Herkimer County (LaRaia, J.), entered November 8, 2001, which revoked the suspended judgment granted August 16, 2000 and terminated the parental rights of respondent Craig, L., Sr.

*1462It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order revoking a six-month suspended judgment and terminating his parental rights, respondent father contends that Family Court erred in admitting evidence on matters occurring after the expiration of the suspended judgment. We disagree. “A hearing on a petition alleging the violation of a suspended judgment is part of the dispositional phase of a permanent neglect proceeding” *(Matter of Saboor C.,*303 AD2d 1022, 1023 [2003]), and thus the best interests of the child must be considered *(see*Family Ct Act § 631). Therefore, evidence bearing upon both the alleged violation and the best interests of the child is admissible at the hearing *(see Matter of Amber*AA., 301 AD2d 694, 696-697 [2003]). We conclude that the preponderance of the evidence at the hearing supports the determination that respondent violated the terms and conditions of the suspended judgment before it expired *(see Matter of Gerald M.,*112 AD2d 6 [1985]). We further conclude that the evidence, when considered in light of respondent’s conduct after the expiration of the suspended judgment, supports the determination that the termination of respondent’s parental rights is in the child’s best interests. Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
164 A.3d 405

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DARYL O. BURGESS (A/K/A JAMES LANE), DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 23, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
DLA Distribution Korea employee instrumental in handling installation COVID-19 response
 
  By Matthew Mahoney, DLA Distribution Public Affairs
  At the epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak in Korea, employees at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, Korea, have been working tirelessly and with dedicated effort to meet the operational needs of U.S.warfighters, all while adhering firmly to the measures and precautions needed to contain and fight back the outbreak that was spiking rapidly in Korea. Notably among those employees and acknowledged by DLA Distribution Korea Commander Army Lt. Col. James M. McGee. “[I] want to acknowledge the exceptional work of our SOH [safety and occupational health] professional, Ms. Pak, Hyo Chi, who has worked tirelessly, including well into the night beyond normal work hours, to send updates on the COVID-19 cases across the peninsula,” said McGee. Korea, as a nation, has made an example of mitigation and infection rates regarding COVID-19. Through the efforts of individuals like Pak, DDDK is currently maintaining an infection rate of zero. An exemplary achievement made possible through exemplary effort. “Since the COVID-19 outbreak began in South Korea, Ms. Pak has worked tirelessly, including well into the night beyond normal work hours, to send updates on the COVID-19 cases across the peninsula,” said McGee. Pak was instrumental in her efforts of keeping everyone informed by gathering information from official resources and disseminating out to everyone in both Korean and in English. “While Ms. Hyo Chi Pak is a Korean national, she attended Washington State University and graduated in 2014 with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing degree and is fluent in English,” said McGee. “She began working for United States Forces Korea in 2016 as an occupational health technician at Camp Walker before joining the DLA Distribution team as the safety occupational health professional in June 2018.” A true safety professional, Pak’s diligent efforts had a positive impact, not only for the installation, but for the surrounding communities as well.
# L_2010278EN.01000901.xml

| 22.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 278/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 278/9

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 946/2010

of 21 October 2010

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 22 October 2010.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 October 2010.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 77,1 |
| MK | 80,4 |
| XS | 73,2 |
| ZZ | 76,9 |
| 0707 00 05 | MK | 87,5 |
| TR | 155,0 |
| ZZ | 121,3 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 140,0 |
| ZZ | 140,0 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 72,5 |
| CL | 46,3 |
| IL | 91,2 |
| TR | 90,3 |
| ZA | 64,8 |
| ZZ | 73,0 |
| 0806 10 10 | BR | 211,4 |
| TR | 140,6 |
| US | 155,2 |
| ZA | 64,2 |
| ZZ | 142,9 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 76,6 |
| BR | 59,6 |
| CL | 85,0 |
| CN | 64,2 |
| NZ | 94,5 |
| US | 82,6 |
| ZA | 93,1 |
| ZZ | 79,4 |
| 0808 20 50 | CN | 72,2 |
| ZA | 88,6 |
| ZZ | 80,4 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

77,1

MK

80,4

XS

73,2

ZZ

76,9

0707 00 05

MK

87,5

TR

155,0

ZZ

121,3

0709 90 70

TR

140,0

ZZ

140,0

0805 50 10

AR

72,5

CL

46,3

IL

91,2

TR

90,3

ZA

64,8

ZZ

73,0

0806 10 10

BR

211,4

TR

140,6

US

155,2

ZA

64,2

ZZ

142,9

0808 10 80

AR

76,6

BR

59,6

CL

85,0

CN

64,2

NZ

94,5

US

82,6

ZA

93,1

ZZ

79,4

0808 20 50

CN

72,2

ZA

88,6

ZZ

80,4

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
Date August 17, 2015

Petitioner

Name Joel Williams

Unmanned Aircraft System s

The petitioner plans to operate a UAS, including a Tarot FY650
, DJI Phantom
, DJI Inspire 1
, T BS Discovery Pro or similar
, which is comprise d of an unmanned aircraft (UA ) and a transportable ground station. These UAs, also referred to as quad

- copters have a maximum gross weight of 5 pounds, and are equipped with four rotors that are driven by electric motors powered by batteries. They will be outfi tted with small cameras (GoPro or similar). They will have a maximum ai rspeed o f 30 knots and will be operated over various areas around San Francisco Bay to enhance academic community awareness ; create 3

- dimensional scans of architectural project sites ; and capture video footage of projects in construction and after com pletion

.

Petitioner will only operate in reasonably safe environments that are strictly controlled, are away from power lines, elevated lights, airports a nd actively populated areas; and only after conduct ing preflight inspections and protocols, during which safety carries primary importance.

The petitioner states that given the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by him, an exemption from 14 CFR part 21, Subpart H (Airworthiness Certificates) and § 91.203 (a) and (b) (Certifications required), subject to certain conditions and limitations, is warranted and meets the requirements for an equivalent level of safety under 14 CFR part 11 and Section 333 of P.L. 112

- 95 (Section 333).

Petitioner requests an exemption from § 45.23 Marking of the aircraft because his UA will not have a cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which to mark certain word s or phrases. Further, he states that two

inch lettering is difficult to place on such a small aircraft with dimensions smaller than the minimal lettering requirement.

The petitioner states that an exemption from §§ 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2) and 91.417(a ) and (b) Maintenance inspections may be required and should be granted since they only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. However, the petitioner states as a safety precaution he will perform a preflight inspection of his UAS before each flight as outlined in his operating documents.
#### Pebble Hill Bldg. Corp. v Madelik

2d Dept: 143 AD3d 684

denied