alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-548-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

May 22, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 14, 1998, as amended May 20, 1998, Koch 
Gateway Pipeline Company (Koch Gateway), Post Office Box 1478, Houston, 
Texas 77251-1478, filed in Docket No. CP98-548-000, a request pursuant 
to Sections 157.205 and 157.216(b) for authorization to abandon by sale 
a lateral line located in East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, under 
Koch Gateway's blanket certificate issued in docket No. CP82-430-000 
pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request which is on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Koch Gateway proposes to abandon by sale to Mid Louisiana Gas 
Transmission (Midla Transmission) a lateral transmission line 
designated as Index 270-80. This lateral line includes approximately 8 
miles of 12-inch pipeline and 2 miles of 6-inch pipeline.
    Koch Gateway states that it serves only one local distribution 
customer, Entex, Inc. It is stated that Koch Gateway and Midla 
Transmission have reached agreement with Entex for continuing service 
to the Entex delivery point.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14203 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 09-1360.

#### Totes-Isotoner Corporation, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 830, 131 S. Ct. 92,

178 L. Ed. 2d 28,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6431.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 594 F.3d 1346.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.9.3

                                AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                     TO THE
                         SOFTWARE OEM LICENSE AGREEMENT
                              NO. SOLA-97SYNP1223

This Amendment is entered into as of 29 December, 2001 ("Effective Date") by and
between Cadence Design Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation having a principal
place of business at 555 River Oaks Parkway, San Jose, CA 95134, Cadence Design
Systems (Ireland) Limited, a corporation organized and existing under the laws
of Ireland and having a place of business at Block U, East Point Business Park,
Dublin 3, Ireland (collectively "Cadence") and Synplicity, Inc., having a place
of business at 935 Stewart Drive, Sunnyvale, California 94085 ("Synplicity").

Effective 23 December 1997, Cadence and Synplicity entered into a Software OEM
License Agreement ("Agreement"). The Agreement includes amendments dated 01
August 1998 and 17 December 1999.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, this
Agreement is amended as follows:

1.  Section 11.1 is revised to read as follows:

The term of this Agreement shall be for a period commencing upon the Effective
Date and ending February 15, 2002 ("Term"). The Term may be extended for
additional one (1) year increments upon written agreement of the parties.

Except as specified above, the Agreement remains in full force and effect
according to its terms. This Amendment No. 3, together with the Agreement,
constitutes the entire agreement among the parties with respect to its subject
matter.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment through the
signatures of their duly authorized representatives as set forth below:

CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.               CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS (IRELAND) LTD.

By:    /s/ Michael J. Williams             By:   /s/ R. L. Smith McKeithen
      ---------------------------------          -------------------------------

Name:  Michael J. Williams                 Name: R. L. Smith McKeithen
      ---------------------------------          -------------------------------

Title: Associate General Counsel           Title: Director
      ---------------------------------          -------------------------------

Date:  2-1-02                                     1/25/02
      ---------------------------------          -------------------------------


SYNPLICITY, INC.

By:    /s/ Douglas S. Miller
      ---------------------------------

Name:  Douglas S. Miller
      ---------------------------------

Title: Chief Financial Officer
      ---------------------------------

Date:  11JAN2002
      ---------------------------------

                                       1
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Morgans Foods, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: July 13, 2009
    /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. HignettSenior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary
No. 09-11152.

#### Bruce Lamont Smith, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 864, 131 S. Ct. 148,

178 L. Ed. 2d 89,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6689.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Muriel F. Siebert, in my capacity as Chairwoman and President of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the
Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by
the Report.

| |                                                        |                       
| | ------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------
| | /s/ Muriel F. Siebert                                  | Dated: August 14, 2009
| |                                                        |                       
| | Muriel F. Siebert                                      |                       
| | Chairwoman and President (principal executive officer) |                       

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be
retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

19

---
Description of Change to Cash Retainer of Non-employee Directors



 Exhibit 10.1 
 On January 24, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase of the forty-four thousand dollar ($44,000) annual cash retainer paid to non-employee directors by six thousand dollars
($6,000).
#### Com. v. Mickeals

04/11/2016

689 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 499
#### Com. v. Prophete

08/16/2016

171 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 210
2016-1648.

#### Fisher v. Doe.

Hamilton App. No. C-160226, 2016-Ohio-7383.

French and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Fischer, J., not participating.
No. 09-11303.

#### Michael Don Watkins, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 873, 131 S. Ct. 175,

178 L. Ed. 2d 105,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6750.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
*September 5,*2017

2017-Ohio-7446.]

2017-1213.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Tinch.

On August 31, 2017, relator filed a motion for immediate interim remedial suspension pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(19). Respondent shall file a response, if any, to relator’s motion by 5:00 p.m. on September 7, 2017.
No. 09-11555.

#### John F. Mosley, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 887, 131 S. Ct. 219,

178 L. Ed. 2d 132,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6906,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

Same case below, 46 So. 3d 510.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6530

FRANK ERVIN ALTIZER, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALAN KATZ; MARY E. SHEA, Esquire; PAMELA A.

SARGENT; T. P. KAGEY; BUCHANAN COUNTY CIRCUIT

COURT; UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-241-R)

Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Altizer v. Katz, No. CA-96-241-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 8, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Golden v Pavlov-Shapiro

4th Dept: 138 AD3d 1406

denied
2017-0003.

#### Worthington City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2016-414. On appellant’s motion for oral argument. Motion granted.
# Olmstead assumes command of DLA Distribution Red River, Texas

/ Published June 21, 2019
RED RIVER, Texas, 
In a change of command ceremony June 20, Army Lt. Col. Seth M. Olmstead assumed command of DLA Distribution Red River, Texas.

“Lt. Col Olmstead is a gifted leader and the right person to continue the strong leadership that Red River has been lucky to have,” said Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones, commanding officer, DLA Distribution. “He has had some great experiences and a variety of key assignments to prepare him for this challenge.”

Olmstead is from Murfreesboro, Tennessee, and he enlisted in the U.S. Army in 1996 as an infantryman. After completing the Green to Gold program, he received his commission as a second lieutenant into the Ordnance Corps from Middle Tennessee State University Reserve Officer Training Corps May 2003. He holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Aerospace and a Master of Arts in Higher Education Administration from the University of Louisville.

His previous operational tours include one tour in Egypt in support of Multinational Force and Observers, two tours in Iraq with 3rd Infantry Division, and one tour in Afghanistan with 101st Airborne Division.

Olmstead is a graduate of the Ordnance Officer Basic Course, Logistics Captain’s Career Course, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Army Master Educator Course, Airborne School and Air Assault School.

“It is an honor to be selected to command this organization,” said Olmstead. “I look forward to this important mission and working with all of you who are so dedicated to its accomplishment.”
# DLA Distribution Commanding General delivers Thanksgiving Day remarks

/ Published Nov. 24, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
This year marks the 400th anniversary of the Plymouth colonists’ celebration of a harrowing but fruitful first year in America thanks to the aid of the Wampanoag and Pawtuxet tribes, and 158 years since, in the midst of a Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln declared the last Thursday of November "as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise" following a significant Union victory at Gettysburg.

While the blessings we celebrate each Thanksgiving may vary throughout the years, there is a common thread that allows us to continue to gather with our families and friends; that thread is freedom.

As we celebrate the holiday with our own traditions and customs, I ask that you keep our men and women serving around the world defending our Nation and way of life in your hearts and prayers. Remember both the bonds that tie us together and the sacrifices our warfighters make to defend our way of life.

Thank you for the dedication and resiliency you demonstrate each day. Mr. Knight and I extend our warmest Thanksgiving wishes to you and your loved ones and ask you to continue to be cautious and follow CDC and local COVID guidelines for gatherings.
Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test 

Archives 

paper records will be retained for at 

a 


least three years after which time the Sponsor will be contacted for a decision as to the final 

disposition of the materials. All study materials returned to the Sponsor or destroyed wiU first be 

copied and the copy will be retained in a minimum of 10 years. 

Unused dosing solutions were disposed of admimstratIon to the test system and all 

residual test substance will be disposed of following finalization of the report. 

Deviations 

No known deviations from the protocol or assay~method SOPs occurred during the conduct 

of this study. 

15 

Page 61 of 133
# 2022 DLA Hall of Fame inductees announced

/ Published June 23, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic has announced inductees into the 2022 DLA Hall of Fame.

“The DLA Hall of Fame recognizes former DLA civilian and military team members who made significant and lasting contributions to this agency and its mission and represent the core DLA values and ideals we strive to uphold today,” she said in a memo to DLA senior leaders.

Inductees are:
      - Edward “Ted” Case, former DLA vice director,
      - Benjamin “Gil” Perkins, former director of DLA Aviation’s Office of Counsel,
      - Janet Price, former director of procurement process support for DLA Aviation,
      - Kathryn Fantasia, former director of DLA Energy’s Direct Delivery Fuels Directorate,
      - Janet Hoffheins, former administrator of DLA Human Resources Services, and
      - Keith Ford, former deputy director of DLA Troop Support’s clothing and textiles supply chain.

Barring COVID-19 restriction, the new members will be inducted Aug. 17 at 1:30 p.m. in the McNamara Headquarters Complex at Fort Belvoir, Va. Information on previous inductees is available at the DLA Hall of Fame webpage.
Exhibit No. 32.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the report of Questar Gas Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ronald W. Jibson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and S. E. Parks, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR GAS COMPANY    November 7, 2008 /s/Ronald W. Jibson Ronald W. Jibson President and Chief Executive Officer    November 7, 2008 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-11158.

#### Eugene Johnny Williams, Petitioner v. North Carolina.

562 U.S. 864, 131 S. Ct. 149,

178 L. Ed. 2d 90,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6797.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.

Same case below, 363 N.C. 689, 686 S.E.2d 493.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                Compu-DAWN, Inc.
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


                                                                                   For the Year Ended
                                                                                      December 31,
                                                                                 1998            1997
                                                                                 ----            ----

NET INCOME (LOSS):
<S>                                                                           <C>              <C>
          Continuing operations                                               $    22,544       $(1,499,349)
          Discontinued operations                                              (2,806,096)       (2,937,396)
                                                                              ------------       -----------

                                                                              $(2,783,552)    $  (4,436,745)
                                                                              ===========        ==========

BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:

          Continuing operations                                                   $  0.01       $    (0.66)
          Discontinued operations                                                   (0.96)           (1.29)
                                                                                   -------           ------
                                                                                  $ (0.95)      $    (1.95)
                                                                                   =======        =========

DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:

          Continuing operations                                                   $  0.01        $   (0.66)
          Discontinued operations                                                   (0.74)           (1.29)
                                                                                  --------        ---------
                                                                                  $ (0.73)       $   (1.95)
                                                                                 =========        =========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF BASIC COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING                             2,937,724         2,270,047
                                                                                =========        ==========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF DILUTED COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING                           3,814,259        2,270,047
                                                                                =========        ==========



</TABLE>



                                                        - Exhibit 11 -
<PAGE>
No. 09-10650.

#### Ivy Anderson and David Johnson, Petitioners v. City of Davis, California, et al.

562 U.S. 848, 131 S. Ct. 95,

178 L. Ed. 2d 60,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5924.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 851.
No. 12-7727.

#### Voth *v.*Stanton, Sheriff, Multnomah County, Oregon.

Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied.
#### Michael Decker, Appellant, v Veronica Capellini, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 572]

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated October 30, 2002, as, upon renewal, granted the *571defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint which previously had been denied in an order of the same court dated September 10, 2002.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, upon renewal, the determination denying the motion for summary judgment in the order dated September 10, 2002, is adhered to, and the complaint is reinstated.

The plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed against residential property owned by the defendant. Upon renewal, the Supreme Court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The court determined that the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether an agreement existed between the parties for the services and materials allegedly provided. However, the plaintiffs verified lien and verified statement in support of his lien were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact, inter alia, as to whether the services and materials allegedly provided were provided with the consent of, or at the request of, the defendant *(see*Lien Law § 3; *Zimmerman v Carlson,*293 AD2d 744 [2002]; *Valsen Constr. Corp. v Long Is. Racquet & Health Club,*228 AD2d 668 [1996]; *Care Sys. v Laramee,*155 AD2d 770 [1989]; *see also Goldman v City of New York,*287 AD2d 482 [2001]). The Supreme Court therefore erred when, upon renewal, it granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jayquan Ward, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 394]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered February 5, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Acosta, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.