alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID SCOTT HARRISON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

J. SHAFFER; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 17409

D.C. No. 3:18

- cv

- 04454

- CRB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 20, 2021 * *

Before: McKEOWN, CALLAHAN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner David Scott Harrison appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due

process violations arising out of his parole hearing . We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de nov o a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 3 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 17409

Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Kwan v. SanMedica Int ’ l , 854 F.3d

1088, 1093 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Harrison ’s action because Harrison

failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible due process claim. See

Swarthout v. Cooke , 562 U.S. 216, 220 (2011) (a federal due process claim in the

parole context requires only that prisoner be provided with an opportunity t o be

heard and a statement of the reasons why parole was denied).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Harrison’s motion

for reconsideration because Harriso n failed to demonstrate any basis for relief. See

Sch. Dist. No. 1J Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc. , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262

- 63 (9th

Cir. 1993) (setting forth grounds for reconsideration)

.

Harrison’s request for appointment of counsel and trial by jury , s et forth in

the opening brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED

.
No. 12-8373.

#### Gonzalez *v.*Jacquez, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28006-28007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications 
System (1196).
    Date and Time: June 8-9, 1998; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 530, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Persons: Dr. Kishan Baheti, Program, Director, Knowledge 
Modeling and Computational Intelligence (KMCI), Division of 
Electrical and Communications Systems, National Science Foundations, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 675, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 
(703) 306-1339.
    Purpose: To provide advice and recommendations concerning 
proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate research proposals in the 
Knowledge Modeling and Computational Intelligence program as part of 
the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical and information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are within exemptions 4 and 6 of 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c) (4) and (6) the Government in the Sunshine Act.


[[Page 28007]]


    Dated: May 18, 1998.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-13630 Filed 5-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  February 25, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patrick Cefalu, CFO of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



 /s/ Patrick Cefalu
-----------------------------
Patrick Cefalu, CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99(1)
                                                                    Page 1 of 1
                                CTG RESOURCES, INC.
                            Annual Report on Form 10-K
                                   Exhibit Index

                       Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 1998

                                                                  Document
         Item                     Description                    Description
     ------------                 -----------                   ------------

       99(1)      Exhibit Index                                    Ex-99.1

      10(55)      Asset Purchase Agreement by and among The        Ex-10.55
                  Hartford Steam Company, CCF-1, Inc. and
                  Kenetech Facilities Management, Inc.

      10(56)      Assignment and Consent by and among The          Ex-10.56
                  Hartford Steam Company, CCF-1, Inc. and
                  The Connecticut Light and Power Company

      10(61)      Reimbursement Agreement (Including               Ex-10.61
                  Irrevocable Letter of Credit) between The
                  Energy Network, Inc. and Fleet National
                  Bank

      10(63)      Note Purchase Agreement between The Energy       Ex-10.63
                  Network, Inc. and Metropolitan Life
                  Insurance Company
      10(73)      First Amendment to the Forward Equity            Ex-10.73
                  Purchase Agreement between CTG Resources,
                  Inc. and The Energy Network, Inc.

      11          Computation of Consolidated Primary and          Ex-11
                  Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share

      21          Subsidiaries of the Registrant                   Ex-21

      23          Consent of Independent Public Accountants        Ex-23

      24          Power of Attorney                                Ex-24

      27          Financial Data Schedule                          Ex-27

     99(2)        Requirements of Form 11-K for the CTG            Ex-99.2
                  Resources Inc. Employee Savings Plan

     99(3)        Requirements of Form 11-K for the CTG            Ex-99.3
                  Resources Inc. Union Employee Savings Plan
No. 12-7922.

#### Comfort *v.*Lee, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       5,351,639
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,273,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,042,536
<PP&E>                                       3,431,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,598,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,573,107
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,503
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,107,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,598,358
<SALES>                                     15,559,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,559,810
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,567,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (429,254)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,421,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,361,820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,059,977
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,059,977
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2002, of ANR Pipeline Company (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Greg G.
Gruber, Chief Financial Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                          /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Greg G. Gruber
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                          August 13, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-18-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-09-1997
<CASH>                                       2,673,000
<SECURITIES>                                   126,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    311,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,402,000
<PP&E>                                      26,550,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,391,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,604,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,649,000
<BONDS>                                     12,888,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,037,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,604,000
<SALES>                                      9,034,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,034,000
<CGS>                                        5,304,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,804,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             312,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (143,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (143,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (143,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.01

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

|NAME                                                    |  | STATE OR JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        |  |                                                       
|GLOBEtrotter   Software, Inc.                           |  | California                                            
|Macrovision   UK Limited                                |  | United   Kingdom                                      
|Macrovision   Europe Limited                            |  | United   Kingdom                                      
|Macrovision   Europe Holding Company Limited            |  | United   Kingdom                                      
|Globetrotter   Europe Limited                           |  | United   Kingdom                                      
|Macrovision   Japan and Asia KK                         |  | Japan                                                 
|Macrovision   Israel, Ltd.                              |  | Israel                                                
|Macrovision   Service Corporation                       |  | Delaware                                              
|Macrovision   (Barbados), Ltd.                          |  | California                                            
|Macrovision   International Holding Limited Partnership |  | Cayman   Islands                                      
|Macrovision   Licensing & Holding B.V.                  |  | Netherlands                                           
|Deterrence   Acquisition Ltd.                           |  | UK
No. 12-7776.

#### Johnson *v.*Varga, Warden.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
* AnthonyJ. Principi has been appointed to serve as Secretary of Veterans Affairs

and is substituted as appellee under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2).



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2237

___________ Rita Graham, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. Anthony J. Principi, * Secretary of * Veterans Affairs; Veterans * [UNPUBLISHED] Administration, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 4, 2001 Filed: May 10, 2001

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Rita Graham appeals the district court's adverse grant of judgment as a matter of law in Graham's employment discriminationlawsuit. Having reviewed the parties' briefs, the pretrial record, and a transcript of the district court's ruling--the only-2-

transcript furnished on appeal--we find no grounds for reversal of the challenged ruling onGraham's claims of race discrimination and retaliation. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2) (appellant has duty to order transcript); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters and Joiners , 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (appellant's failure to provide complete transcript makes it impossible to review evidence presented at trial), cert. denied , 484 U.S. 1071 (1988). We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Argentina (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Argentina (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6.54   | W      | 18.00  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2369

In Re: SEAN LAMONT DUDLEY, a/k/a John D. Brown,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:97-cr-00001-RLV-1)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean Lamont Dudley, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sean Lamont Dudley has petitioned this court for a 

writ of mandamus. In his petition, Dudley asks this court to

order the district court to establish that it had authority to 

accept his guilty plea under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(3) 

(requiring a district court to determine whether there is a 

factual basis for a guilty plea). To obtain mandamus relief, a 

petitioner must show that:

(1) he has a clear and indisputable right to the 

relief sought; (2) the responding party has a clear 

duty to do the specific act requested; (3) the act 

requested is an official act or duty; (4) there are no 

other adequate means to attain the relief he desires; 

and (5) the issuance of the writ will effect right and 

justice in the circumstances.

In re Braxton, 258 F.3d 250, 261 (4th Cir. 2001) (internal 

quotation marks and citation omitted). We have considered 

Dudley’s petition and conclude that Dudley is not entitled to 

mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny Dudley’s motion for leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>
                                       
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Electronic Processing, Inc.
501 Kansas Avenue
Kansas City, Kansas 66105


   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
of Electronic Processing, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-30847) for the 
registration of 270,000 shares of its common stock and options to acquire 
common stock, of our reports dated February 8, 1999, on our audits of the 
financial statements of Electronic Processing, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 
and 1997, and for each of the years then ended, which reports are included in 
the Company's 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, filed with the Securities 
and Exchange Commission.

                                           BAIRD, KURTZ & DOBSON

Kansas City, Missouri
March 25, 1999
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                               HEALTH GRADES, INC

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


         I, Kerry R. Hicks, Chief Executive Officer of Health Grades, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my
knowledge:

         (1) The Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year-ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/  KERRY R. HICKS
-----------------------------------
Kerry R. Hicks
President and CEO

Date: April 11, 2003
#### Fed. Nat’l. Mortgage v. Chapman

DA 16-0566

06/27/17

2017 MT 160N

Affirmed

Dist. 18 (Gallatin)
#### Freedman v. W.C.A.B. (Starr Restuarant)

08/31/2016

152 EAL (2016)

Denied
Section 114 Request

Start-up/Shutdowns/Malfunctions 

2009

I. HOURS DOWNTIME

 Nitric Acid Plant Tail Gas Stack

HRS

DATE CAUSE DOWN

1/8/2009 Steam Leak Forces an Emergency Shutdown in 8

the Nitric Acid Plant 

3/10/2009 Routine Gauze Change 8.25

5/18/2009 Nitric Acid Plant Outage Due to Power Dip 7.5

6/11/2009 Routine Gauze Change 14

9/14/2009 Bi-Annual Maintenance Turnaround 482

-10/2/2010

TOTAL 519.75

 Hours of Operation = 8760 hr/yr - 519.75 hrs down = 8240

2008

I. HOURS DOWNTIME

 Nitric Acid Plant Tail Gas Stack

HRS

DATE CAUSE DOWN

1/3-5/2008 Leak in the Nitric Acid Converter Basket Forces an 55.83

Emergency Shutdown in the Nitric Acid Plant

3/3/2008 Routine Gauze Change 12

6/3/2008 Routine Gauze Change 12

9/9-10/2008 Routine Gauze Change 23

9/29-30/2008 Leak from RV-700 Forces an Emergency Shutdown 9

in the Nitric Acid Plant 

12/9/2008 Routine Gauze Change 18

TOTAL 129.83

 Hours of Operation = 8784 hr/yr - 129.83 hrs down = 8654
2007

I. HOURS DOWNTIME

 Nitric Acid Plant Tail Gas Stack

HRS

DATE CAUSE DOWN

3/8/2007 Routine Gauze Change 11.6

6/2/2007 Bi-Annual Maintenance Turnaround 431.5

9/20/2007 Routine Gauze Change 15.5

10/10/2007 Coked Reformer Catalyst Forces a Plant Wide 251

Emergency Shutdown

TOTAL 709.6

 Hours of Operation = 8760 hr/yr - 709.6 hrs down = 8050