alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Grewal v DHL Express (USA), Inc.

1st Dept: 149 AD3d 450

motions denied
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to China (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to China (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 10,484 | 24,007 | 681    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT
32.2




STATEMENT
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Donald
Hillier, Principal Financial Officer of Axion Power International, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:




The
Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December
31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Donald
      HillierDonald
      Hillier, Principal Financial OfficerDated:
      November 6, 2009
#### Cramer, Matter of, v Cramer

4th Dept: 143 AD3d 1264

denied
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**Certification of the Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to18 U.S. C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (the “Company”)on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), JerryWong, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

June 28,2010

 
| /s/ Jerry Wong          |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Jerry Wong              |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
# Volunteering at Bahrain’s animal shelter

/ Published April 14, 2021
ASKAR, Bahrain, 
The Persian donkey’s origins are a mystery. Pale as the color of the Bahrain sand, the donkey has no name but loves apples.

Grooming the beloved donkey, walking dogs and playing with kittens brightens the lives of not only the sheltered animals but also the Defense Logistics Agency Energy Middle East team who volunteer at the Bahrain Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.  

Army Lt. Col. Kristyn Felix is the chief of Supplier Operations for DLA Energy Middle East. She has been volunteering at the BSPCA shelter for two months. SPCAs are a common name for non-profit animal welfare organizations around the world. The local Bahrain shelter is home to a mixture of 40-50 animals that have been surrendered or found in the island kingdom of Bahrain in the Persian Gulf.

“I love animals,” Felix said. “I have a rescue cat at home, Bruno, that I miss, and being with animals on a weekly basis in a way makes up for it.”  

Inspired by Felix’s activities, five of her colleagues also volunteered. Chief of Customer Operations Army Lt. Col. Justin Darnell, Petroleum Operations Officer Army Reserve Maj. Frank Parillo, Petroleum Operations Officers Army Reserve Capt. Demetrios Rocco and Air Force Capt. Michael Tannen, and Quality Assurance Representative Army Sgt. 1st Class Elizabeth Grace.

“I’ve been going to the BSCPA on a weekly basis to be outside and help some lonely animals. I walk 2-3 dogs every time I visit,” Felix said. “It’s a great way to start the weekend.”

Volunteering is a favorite activity of DLA Energy Middle East employees stationed in Bahrain.

“I also strongly believe in helping where I can,” Felix said. “I’ve been doing beach clean ups with a group here for a few months. When that stopped, volunteering at the BSCPA was another great opportunity.”

Each year Bahrain holds an annual donkey race. It's possible the donkey may have been a participant.  

“I don’t know his name but since I’ve been volunteering, he has been there,” Felix said. “I started bringing him apples, which he loves. I just bought some grooming brushes to help with his coat.”  

“I plan on having another volunteer event in May after Ramadan,” Felix said.     

The BSPCA was established in 1979 by a small group of committed and passionate animal lovers. The Society was officially registered by the Bahrain Ministry of Labor as a humane, charitable, non-profit organization dedicated to the welfare of animals. According to the agency’s website, the BSPCA is run by a dedicated group of volunteers and receives no official funding whatsoever. The Society depends on the generosity of the public for its funds as well as monies generated by the Thrift Shop.
No. 09-9871.

#### Donald G. Jones, Petitioner v. The Shaw Group, et al.

562 U.S. 842, 131 S. Ct. 72,

178 L. Ed. 2d 50,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6011.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.2



MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



The undersigned, Susan E. Knight, the Chief Financial Officer of MTS Systems Corporation (the Company), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2006 (the Report).



The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: August 7, 2006



| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  | 

---
Storm drain improvements good for installation, environment
 
  By Environmental Management Division, DLA Installation Management Richmond
  Views of white steam erupting from manhole covers around the installation might remind one of majestic geysers or whales expelling air at the ocean surface; but this warm cloud of condensation serves its own purpose for the infrastructure of Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Over time, any stormwater system will begin to wear and crack. These cracks allow water and other liquids, including externally-sourced liquid, to leave the stormwater system and enter local streams. To minimize the potential for leakage, over the next several months, we will be re-lining and repairing the entire system, said Jimmy Parrish, chief, Environmental Management Division, Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond. When steam escapes from installation storm drains, it is evidence of the curing process that new fiberglass protective liners undergo as they are installed throughout the storm drain network, explained Parrish. “There are more than 23 miles of storm drains and pipes strategically laid out across the installation,” Parrish said. “These drains capture the runoff from any storm event and discharge this runoff into the streams that border the installation.” Parrish said because of the variety of activities that occur on the installation—construction, landscaping, and employee and contractor parking—and the contaminants they may generate, each of the stormwater outfalls to these streams are environmentally regulated. “Our compliance with these regulations is mandated through a permit with Virginia’s Department of Environmental Quality,” he said. “We routinely test and report the quality of the water that enters the streams from our stormwater system to ensure that we do not exceed the limits of our permit.” “These structural improvements should give us the ability to continually meet the high environmental standards that we set for ourselves for many years to come,” he said.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derek Hahn, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 899]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated May 11, 2016, which, after a hearing, designated him a level one sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The defendant is a former United States Navy service member who was found guilty after a court martial of rape in violation of article 120 (a) (2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 USC § 920 [a] [2]). Following a hearing, the County Court determined that the defendant’s military conviction required him to register as a sex offender in New York pursuant to Correction Law § 168-a (2) (d) (i), and designated him a level one sex offender.

As relevant to this appeal, Correction Law § 168-a directs that a person convicted of an offense in a foreign jurisdiction is required to register in New York when the foreign offense contains “all of the essential elements” of a New York offense that is subject to registration (Correction Law § 168-a [2] [d] [i]), or when the subject offense is “a felony in any other jurisdiction for which the offender is required to register as a sex offender in the jurisdiction in which the conviction occurred” (Correction Law § 168-a [2] [d] [ii]; *see Matter of North v Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders of State of N.Y.,*8 NY3d 745, 748-749 [2007]).

On appeal, the defendant’s sole contention is that he was not required to register as a sex offender pursuant to Correction Law § 168-a (2) (d) (ii) because the People failed to establish that he was required to register as a sex offender with the Navy. Although the People correctly concede that the defendant’s military conviction did not require him to register as a sex offender pursuant to Correction Law § 168-a (2) (d) (ii) because the Navy does not maintain a sex offender registry (see *Matter of North v Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders of State of N.Y.,*8 NY3d at 749; *People v Kennedy,*7 NY3d 87 [2006]), in this case the County Court determined that the defendant was required to register as a sex offender pursuant to Correction Law § 168-a (2) (d) (i). As the Court of Appeals has noted, Correction Law § 168-a (2) (d) (i) “remains available” as a basis for requiring military offenders to register if the People can prove that the subject military offense “includes all of the essential elements provided for in the New York statutes *1286described in that subsection” *(People v Kennedy,*7 NY3d at 92). The defendant raises no challenge to the court’s determination that the military offense of which he was convicted includes all of the essential elements of a New York offense for which registration is required. Under these circumstances, the court properly determined that the defendant is required to register as a sex offender in New York.

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Balkin and Barros, JJ., concur.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-20838 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RAMON FLORES, also known as Pablito, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CR-79-2
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appo i n t e d to represent Ramon Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flor e s h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan t p ortions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 21 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-20838 Document: 00511640146 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011No. 10-20838

counsel is excused from further responsibilities he r e i n, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-20838 Document: 00511640146 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
# New commander visits Bragg site

/ Published Sept. 16, 2020
FORT BRAGG, N.C., Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Warfighter first and strong partnership are two tenants of the Defense Logistics Agency strategic plan that were reinforced as the staff at the DLA Disposition Services’ site at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, hosted a new unit commander for a tour. 

Army Col. Fredericka Harris visited the site in August after assuming command of the 406th Army Field Support Brigade during July. Harris and Command Sgt. Maj. Fu H. Pi were briefed on DLA operations at the site and took a tour of the facilities. 

Area Manager Terry Harrington said the visit offered the chance to discuss the “plethora of benefits” the site offers Fort Bragg units to discuss a number of the 406th AFSB’s burgeoning requirements like displaced excess property support and optimizing support to the Logistics Readiness Center at Fort Jackson, South Carolina.                 Army Col. Fredericka Harris, new commander 406th Army Field Support Brigade, left, presents a commander’s coin to Curtis Mitchell, local operations chief, left center, and Terry Harrington, right center, area manager, during an August visit by Harris and Command Sgt. Maj. Fu H. Pi, far right, to the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services site at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.                            Receiving coins                            Army Col. Fredericka Harris, new commander 406th Army Field Support Brigade, left, presents a commander’s coin to Curtis Mitchell, local operations chief, left center, and Terry Harrington, right center, area manager, during an August visit by Harris and Command Sgt. Maj. Fu H. Pi, far right, to the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services site at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Assarine ChearsVIRIN: 200831-D-D0441-002

“She was primarily alluding to greater support by the local disposal services representative, support that would involve robust instruction and guidance,” Harrington said. 

Harrington said such robust support can alleviate issues during the disposal process and offer ways to expedite the process.

“Prior to COVID, we held a Disposition 101 class at our facility every Friday at 9 a.m.,” Harrington said.” “We plan to do the same at Fort Jackson once this pandemic subsides.”
#### Illinois National Insurance Company, Respondent, v Robert Schumann et al., Appellants.

[63 NYS3d 234]—

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered September 15, 2016, in favor of plaintiff, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered September 30, 2016, which, among other things, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and granted plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment on its claim for $64,000 against defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly determined that defendants owed plaintiff the balance of its Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 lien and that defendants had failed to prove an accord and satisfaction of the lien, as there was no bona fide dispute concerning the amount due and owing *(Marine Midland Bank v Scallen,*161 AD2d 103, 105 [1st Dept 1990]).

In any event, and as a separate rationale for the result, the motion court providently exercised its discretion in sanctioning defendants for noncompliance with the court’s discovery orders (CPLR 3126) so that accord and satisfaction was unavailable to defendants as an affirmative defense.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Andrias, Gische, Kern and Singh, JJ.
#### Orchard Hotel, LLC, Respondent, v Flintlock Construction Service LLC, Appellant, and Brooklyn Federal Savings Bank et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[57 NYS3d 395]

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered May 19, 2014, which denied as moot plaintiff’s and defendants Brooklyn Federal Savings Bank and State Bank of Texas’s motions to dismiss defendant Flintlock Construction Service LLC’s amended answer, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, and the matter remitted for a determination of the motions on the merits. Order, same court and Justice, entered December 27, 2016, which denied Flintlock’s motion to lift the stay of the action, unanimously modified, on the facts, to lift the stay so as to allow Flintlock to prosecute those claims asserted in the amended answer filed August 28, 2013 that remain pending and for a determination on its motion for an order of attachment, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In the December 2016 order, the court acknowledged that its May 2014 orders denying as moot the motions to dismiss the relevant claims in Flintlock’s 2013 amended answer were in error because the court failed to consider the sufficiency of those claims, mistakenly considering the allegations in a 2012 proposed amended answer. The court also found that as a result of those erroneous orders, pending a determination of this appeal, Flintlock did not possess valid causes of action allowing for the lifting of the stay and consideration of its motion for an order of attachment, and the court noted that Flintlock’s sole remedy might lie in application for relief to this Court.

*555In light of the above, we reverse the May 2014 orders, lift the stay, and remit the matter to the court for a substantive determination on the merits of the motions to dismiss the 2013 amended answer and Flintlock’s motion for an order of attachment *(see e.g. Bucci v Village of Port Chester,*22 NY2d 195, 204 [1968]).

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Richter, Feinman, Webber and Kahn, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,143,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,052,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,847,356
<INVENTORY>                                  1,675,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,489,599
<PP&E>                                       7,204,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                 972,521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,315,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,171,899
<BONDS>                                     27,361,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       387,679
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,605,994)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,315,484
<SALES>                                     72,071,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            72,071,956
<CGS>                                       67,607,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,638,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,236,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,410,445)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,414,445)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)


</TABLE>
================================================================================

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Terra Systems, Inc., on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark Faerber, a
consultant performing certain services for the Company commonly performed by a
Chief Financial Officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date: April 14, 2008


/s/ Mark Faerber
------------------------------------------
Mark Faerber
Consultant performing certain services for the Company
commonly performed by a Chief Financial Officer
















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------