alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 09-11526.

#### Warren Chase, Petitioner v. Gary D. Maynard, Secretary, Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, et al.

562 U.S. 886, 131 S. Ct. 215,

178 L. Ed. 2d 129,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6956,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 373 Fed. Appx. 348.
# Upcoming renovations to Defense Logistics Agency facility at NAS Corpus Christi

/ Published Sept. 28, 2021
JACKSONVILLE, Fla., 
Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Southeast awarded a $9.9 million firm-fixed-price task order, Sept. 14, to Walga Ross Group JV from Joplin, Missouri, for renovation of building 1846 at Naval Air Station Corpus Christi, Texas.The building is currently occupied by Defense Logistics Agency Distribution and serves as the command’s main mission operations center.“DLA is investing heavily in our people and modernization of our facilities to provide better, faster and cheaper support to the Warfighter,” said DLA Distribution Corpus Christi Commander Lt. Col. Cody M. Autrey.The work to be performed provides for renovation of the two-level command suite and administrative office area. Also included is the reconfiguration of the two-level office space, and mechanical and fire protection upgrades to the warehouse.Temporary facilities will be provided to support displaced DLA Distribution personnel during the construction.“Public Works Department Corpus Christi is excited for the opportunity to provide construction management and oversight on behalf of a major reimbursable customer;” said Public Works Officer Cmdr. Stephen Lampert. “We look forward to safely executing the delivery of the renovation of building 1846, both on time and on budget.”The project is expected to be completed by January 2023.
No. 09-1259.

#### John Lonberg, Petitioner v. City of Riverside, California.

562 U.S. 829, 131 S. Ct. 78,

178 L. Ed. 2d 26,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6408.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 571 F.3d 846.
No. 09-11452.

#### Cedric Demond Bowman, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 881, 131 S. Ct. 201,

178 L. Ed. 2d 121,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6571.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 487.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM  10-K  FOR THE  FISCAL  YEAR  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                           9,946,621
<SECURITIES>                                                     3,247,296
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   11,690,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      (630,819)
<INVENTORY>                                                      3,005,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                26,852,370
<PP&E>                                                           6,336,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    (553,689)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  39,755,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            5,663,077
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                            81,137
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      32,923,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    39,755,111
<SALES>                                                         27,698,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                27,698,260
<CGS>                                                           12,989,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    8,934,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 1,317,334
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  30,456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  6,291,852
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     2,476,347
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              3,815,505
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     3,815,505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0.50
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31482-31483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research


Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2) announcement is made of the following 
subcommittees scheduled to meet during the month of June 1998:

    Name: Health Care Technology and Decision Sciences.
    Date and Time: June 12, 1998, 1:00 p.m.
    Place: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 2101 East 
Jefferson Street, Suite 400, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Open June 12, 1:00 p.m. to 1:15 p.m.
    Closed for remainder of meeting.

    Name: Health Systems Research.
    Date and Time: June 17, 1998, 8:00 a.m.
    Place: Radisson Barcelo, 2121 P Street, NW, Room TBD, 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Open June 17, 8:00 a.m. to 8:15 a.m.
    Closed for remainder of meeting.

    Name: Health Care Quality and Effectiveness Research.
    Date and Time: June 19, 1998 8:00 a.m.
    Place: Radisson Barcelo, 2121 P Street, NW, Room TBD, 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Open June 19, 8:00 a.m. to 8:15 a.m.
    Closed for remainder of meeting.
    Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Agenda: The open session of the meetings will be devoted to 
business covering administrative matters and reports. During the 
closed sessions, the Subcommittees will be reviewing and discussing 
grant applications dealing with health services research issues. In 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, section 10(d) of 
5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C., 552b(c)(6), the Administrator, 
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, has made a formal 
determination that these latter sessions will be closed because the 
discussions are likely to reveal personal information concerning 
individuals associated with the applications. This information is 
exempt from mandatory disclosure.
    Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, minutes of the 
meetings, or other

[[Page 31483]]

relevant information should contact Ms. Jenny Griffith, Committee 
Management Officer, Office of Scientific Affairs, Agency for Health 
Care Policy and Research, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Suite 400, 
Rockville, Maryland 20852, Telephone (301) 594-1455 x 1036.
    Agenda items for these meetings are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: June 2, 1998.
John M. Eisenberg,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-15270 Filed 6-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             226
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,864
<PP&E>                                          23,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,842
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,901
<SALES>                                        117,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,352
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,877
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,588
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,013
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,013
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78


</TABLE>
# DLA flag makers create first Space Force flag

/ Published May 21, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense leaders presented the Space Force flag to President Donald J. Trump May 15 at the White House in Washington, D.C. The flag was created at the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support flag room in Philadelphia.

The flag represents the newly created armed service, and will hang alongside those of the other military services at the White House.

The Army Institute of Heraldry provided the flag room with drawings for the Space Force flag. 

“These drawings tell us exactly how to make the flag, and we take great pride in the accuracy and precision we use to interpret the flag into embroidery, following each specification, dimension, color and design that they give us,” Linda Farrell, flag room supervisor said. “We try to achieve an embroidered piece of art on every flag that we make so that we convey the symbolism, pride and emotion that the colors represent.”

Digitizer Adam Walstrum worked on the Space Force flag using embroidery machine technology and described elements of the production process.

“It’s such an incredible experience bringing life to these drawings,” Walstrum said. “Digitizing is a really interesting art form because every digitizer is going to treat it differently depending on the different material you’re working on, the design itself and [the machine itself].”

Completing the flag is truly a team effort.

Following Walstrum’s machine embroidery, Farrell completed all the technical hand sewing and fusing. Finishing the flag, Nancy Chhim, seamstress, sewed on the label and fringing.

Gen. John “Jay” Raymond, Commander, U.S. Space Force, visited the flag room in early March to meet the embroidery team and see the flag-making process first-hand.

“It was an honor to personally meet with the talented Troop Support team that made the first U.S. Space Force flag,” Raymond said. “They’re part of history in the making as we continue to establish the heritage of our nation’s newest armed service.”

Raymond signed the Space Force flag on base fabric that would be covered with stitches. He also laid the first batch of stiches for the Space Force emblem by starting the embroidery machine.

“We appreciate you choosing the flag room to make the first Space Force flag,” Farrell told Raymond. “The flag room has a rich history of embroidery, and now the Space Force is going to be the next chapter in our story.”

The flag room is also making flags for the chief of Space Operations, the vice chief of Space Operations, and general officer flags.

Before leaving the flag room, Raymond met each of the embroidery specialists and digitizers and presented them coins of appreciation.

“I learned a lot today, and it was great to meet the team and see them in action,” Raymond said.

While the flag room continues to make Space Force flags, broad commercial availability of flags is still in the works.
No. 09-11445.

#### Timothy Liddell, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 881, 131 S. Ct. 199,

178 L. Ed. 2d 120,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6889.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 474.
# Employee Spotlight: Shawn Platt

/ Published June 23, 2021
RICHOND, Va, 
*Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs. For more information, call (804) 279-3139.*

**Name:** Shawn Platt

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Ogden

**Years of Service:** 15 years

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?**I’m a business process analyst. In this capacity, I work directly with the DLA Aviation Storage and Distribution Division, writing standard operating procedures for their functional processes such as courtesy store storage and accounting, and pick, move and stow of material in the Distribution Standard System. I conduct classroom and virtual training via online conferencing for those processes and also provide guidance and oversight on storage and distribution functional process as well.

**What do you like most about your job?** Only being in my job for a short while after being deployed as an Army reservist, the knowledge I’ve gained and being challenged by the classes we teach and then being able to share that material in a classroom setting are two things I like most about my job.

**What is your fondest memory of working for DLA Aviation?** I really appreciate the times that we have done team-building events where we were able to give back in service towards the community.

**What kind(s) of training and education helps your work performance in your current role?** The preparation and studying of the course materials and learning from the expertise of my co-workers is fantastic. It prepares me to grow and increase my performance in my role.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?** Some of my passions outside of work are spending time with family, hunting, hiking, camping and riding motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles and horses.

**If you had a theme song, what would it be and why?** “Wanted Dead or Alive “by Bon Jovi. Have always loved the song as it is a mirror of my life.

**If you could pick a personal motto, what would it be?** Mt personal motto would be carpe diem, which means seize the day.

**What is/are your favorite book(s), television show(s) or movie(s)?** My favorite books are “The Sigma Force” series by James Rollins. My favorite TV shows are “The Blacklist” and “Yellowstone.” My favorite movies would be “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy and all the Marvel superhero movies.

**What type of music do you most enjoy?** I love a wide variety of music, but my favorite is symphonic rock, which is played mostly in Europe.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-76,617-02

EX PARTE DIEDRIK IVAN CAVIL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 06-10-10374-CR IN THE 284 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per curiam. Keller, P.J., Keasler, J., and Hervey, J. dissent.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a

controlled substance and sentenced to forty-five years’ imprisonment. The Ninth Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction. Cavil v. State, No. 09-08-00049-CR (Tex. App.–Beaumont August 26,

2009).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that he is actually innocent of the crime for which he is

convicted, possession of more than one gram of cocaine. His claim is not a true innocence claim,
2

but rather a claim that he is not eligible for the sentence he received. State v. Wilson, 324 S.W.3d

595, 598 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). 

This case is one of many cases affected by a forensic scientist who was found to have not

follow accepted standards when analyzing evidence. This Court addressed these cases in a recent

published opinion. Ex parte Coty, 418 S.W.3d 597 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). In Coty, this Court

established a two-prong test to determine whether a due process violation occurred in a case handled

by a forensic scientist who has been found to have committed misconduct in a different case. 

The trial court has made findings pursuant to that two-part test and recommends that this

Court grant relief. Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 06-10-10374-CR in the 284th

District Court of Montgomery County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the

Sheriff of Montgomery County. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10

days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: May 7, 2014

Do Not Publish
#### Angel Alvarado, Also Known as Angel Albarado, Appellant, v French Council LLC et al., Respondents.

[50 NYS3d 280]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Kalish, J.), entered February 19, 2016, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*582Plaintiff was injured when, while doing plastering work during the course of a renovation of a residence, he fell approximately six feet from a makeshift scaffold. The record shows that plaintiff’s Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims, which were premised on the theory that plaintiff’s injuries arose from the means and methods of his work, were properly dismissed. Plaintiff testified that his employer instructed him on the tasks that he was to perform, and there is no evidence that defendants exercised any supervision or control over plaintiff’s work *(see Howard v Turner Constr. Co.,*134 AD3d 523, 524-525 [1st Dept 2015]). Furthermore, plaintiff’s Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) claims were not viable in light of the homeowner’s exemptions set forth in the statutes *(see Bartoo v Buell,*87 NY2d 362, 368-369 [1996]; *Farias v Simon,*122 AD3d 466 [1st Dept 2014].

Concur— Acosta, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
45CSR14

PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAJOR MODIFICATION OF MAJOR

STATIONARY SOURCES FOR THE PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT

DETERIORATION OF AIR QUALITY

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS

On June 6, 2014, the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) commenced a thirty day public

comment period and subsequently held a public hearing on July 7, 2014 to accept oral comments

on proposed revisions to legislative rules 45CSR14. Written comments were also accepted through

6:00 PM on Monday, July 7, 2014. No commenter submitted written comments regarding proposed

revisions to rule 45CSR14, and no commenter provided relevant verbal comment.

1
# DLA Energy supports Northern Edge 21 exercise

/ Published May 19, 2021

Defense Logistics Agency Energy Americas North provided fuel solutions for Air Force and Marine Corps units operating at remote Alaskan sites during exercise Northern Edge 21, May 3-17.

NE21 is a U.S. Indo-Pacific Command exercise designed to provide war fighter training, test joint interoperability, and enhance the combat readiness of participating forces while utilizing Alaska's strategic location.

“This is a huge accomplishment to support the exercise of these expeditionary capabilities here in Alaska,” said DLA Energy Americas North Commander Air Force Maj. Marcus McWilliams. “DLA Energy’s contracting team helped put the solicitations together for these unique opportunities and our vendors totally delivered.”  

Deputy Director for DLA Energy Americas North, Julio “Randy” Banez, said the services are experimenting with ways to conduct distributed operations at remote sites far from main operating bases. 

To support the warfighters training, DLA Energy contracted with multiple vendors to provide innovate fuel solutions at two different sites in Alaska. 

In King Salmon, Alaska, the logistics supply chain to deliver fuel stretches 750 miles from the refinery to the airport to military refueling equipment. 

In Cold Bay, Alaska, the DLA Energy contractor used a commercial mobile additive injection system to convert jet fuel in to military standard fuel on site. The fuel was used to support the Marine Corps’ 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit, who is providing the on-ground support to a mix of Marine, Navy, and Air Force aircraft.

Air Force personnel also used the Agile Combat Employment concept to support flying operations using a mobile fuel bladder system at Allen Army Airfield, near Fort Greely, Alaska, Banez said.  

“U.S. defense strategy has made increasing our combat capabilities to defend the Arctic/High North a priority,” said DLA Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Jimmy Canlas. “Like the military units operating during the Northern Edge exercise, DLA Energy also uses the exercise as an opportunity to test our ability to advance combat tactics and expeditionary support processes in the region.”

Canlas participated in pre-exercise planning when he was in Alaska during a command familiarization tour to the Indo-Pacific region, April 25-May 5.

McWilliams said he is eager to see how the partnerships developed during NE21 will grow for executing these types of missions worldwide during future exercises and operational missions.
No. 09-10817.

#### Raymond Alexander Ford, Jr., Petitioner v. Gene M. Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

562 U.S. 853, 131 S. Ct. 111,

178 L. Ed. 2d 68,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5851,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

*69Same case below, 354 Fed. Appx. 760.
No. 12-8452.

#### Brandau *v.*Pastrana, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.