alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.2



 







Exhibit
10.2







CA, Inc.

Restricted Stock Unit Certificate




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

Name of Participant

	 	 

EmplID
	 	 






	 	 	 
	Grant Number

	 	RU****
	Total Number of Restricted Stock Unit Awards Granted

	 	**0 **
	Grant Date
	 	 
	Stock Price on Grant Date

	 	 $





This Certificate confirms the grant under the CA, Inc. 2002 Incentive Plan, as amended and
restated effective as of May 20, 2005 (the “Plan”), to the above-named participant of the amount
of Restricted Stock Units set forth above. This Certificate does not constitute ownership of any
shares of Common Stock of CA, Inc. (the “Company”) or confer any rights associated with the
ownership of shares, except as expressly set forth herein. This grant is subject in all respects
to the applicable terms of the Plan, which are incorporated by reference in this Certificate.



This award will vest [INSERT VESTING SCHEDULE] on [INSERT VESTING DATE(S)]. No shares of Common
stock shall be issued to the participant prior to the date on which the Restricted Stock Units
vest, and shall be forfeited by the participant upon the participant’s Termination of Employment,
as defined in the Plan, prior to vesting for any reason other than death or Disability, as defined
in the Plan. All shares of restricted stock units will immediately vest upon the participant’s
death or Disability or upon a Change in Control of the Company.



Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, this Restricted Stock Units grant shall be subject to the
applicable terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement entered into by and between CA, Inc.
and the Optionee, dated as of [_________], which are incorporated herein by reference.



The Company may, in its discretion, satisfy any statutory tax withholding obligations that arise
in connection with the Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to this award by (i) withholding
shares of Common Stock that would otherwise be available for delivery upon the vesting of such
Restricted Stock Units having a Fair Market Value, as defined in the Plan, on the date the shares
first become taxable equal to the minimum statutory withholding obligation with respect to such
taxable shares and/or (ii) requiring that a participant pay to the Company, by cash, certified
check, bank draft or money order, an amount sufficient to satisfy any such statutory tax
withholding obligations.




	 	 	 	 	 
	By
**Exhibit 32.02**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the Annual Report of Macrovision Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James Budge certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), that to the best of his knowledge: 

(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and 

(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as of March 2, 2006.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31808-31809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Renew Collections: Comment Request

SUMMARY: U.S. agency for International Development (USAID) is making 
efforts to reduce the paperwork burden. USAID invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on the following continuing information collections, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are requested concerning: (1) 
Whether the continuing collections of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether 
information shall have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the 
burden estimates; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and

[[Page 31809]]

clarity of the information collected, and (4) ways to minimize the 
burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.
    Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 60 days of this 
notification.

ADDRESSES INFORMATION TO: Beverly Johnson, Bureau for Management, 
Office of Administrative Services, Information and Records Division, 
U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C. 20523, 202-
712-1365 or via e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dab8b0b5b2b4a9b5b49aafa9bbb3bef4bdb5ac"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a78707572746975745a6f697b737e347d756c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Number: OMB 0412-0546.
    Form Number: AID 1550-12.
    Title: Request for Shipment of Commodities for Foreign 
Distribution. (Foreign Government)
    Type of Submission: Renew.
    Purpose: A USAID Title III form is needed by which the specific 
needs of the recipient country can be communicated to U.S. Department 
of Agriculture by USAID. The form will be used to request food 
commodities for approved P.L. 480 Title III country programs overseas 
and to furnish procurement instruction and other pertinent information 
necessary to ship these commodities to destination ports.
    Annual reporting Burden:
    Respondents: 13.
    Total annual responses: 55.
    Total annual hours requested: 60.

    Dated: June 3, 1998.
Willette L. Smith,
Chief, Information and Records Division, Bureau for Management, Office 
of Administrative Services.
[FR Doc. 98-15436 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/d07b1474/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Disposition Services honors the victims of September 11th 

/ Published Sept. 13, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
The events of September 11th, 2001 are likely to stand out in the minds of everyone who is old enough to remember that tragic day. In Battle Creek, Michigan, employees at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center paid homage to the victims of those terrorist attacks that took place 20 years ago.

                Disposition Services honors the victims of September 11th                            Michael Cannon, Director of DLA Disposition Services speaks to employees at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center as they paid homage to victims of those terrorist attacks that took place 20 years ago.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 091021-D-AU600-202“20 years after that infamous day I ask us to do three things,” said Mike Cannon, the director of Disposition Services. “Remember, honor and educate. It’s our duty as Americans, as Department of Defense employees and as Defense Logistics Agency teammates to do all of these especially on this significant anniversary.”

The Morale, Welfare and Recreation office organized outdoor events for the day to allow for as much participation as possible.

“We wanted to focus on the 20th anniversary,” said the Battle Creek MWR Business Manager Steven Gales, ”So we scheduled an outdoor event giving people the opportunity to reflect on their remembrance of the event. We followed that up by partnering with our fitness center to do a 5K run/walk. Participation was really good for the run and some people are actually doing it virtually as well.”

For those present, it was an opportunity to show appreciation for all who served and those still serving to defend our nation.

When asked what prompted him to participate in the day’s events, Andrew P. Van Koevering, of Disposition Services command support team responded by saying, “Motivation to continue to honor those lost and those that continue to live today that served. Anything that I can do to reflect that gratitude, I will do.”

                Andrew Van Koevering and Doug Mulvaney, both of DLA Disposition Services, take part in the Run to Remember 5K on September 10, 2021.                            Disposition Services honors the victims of September 11th                            Andrew Van Koevering and Doug Mulvaney, both of DLA Disposition Services, take part in the Run to Remember 5K on September 10, 2021.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 091021-D-AU600-201
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 12-1886 KRISTO RUCI, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

**ERRATA SHEET**  The opinion of this Court issued on December 23, 2013, should be amended as follows: On page 5, line 10, delete "on" and replace with "in".
2005-2284.

#### State v. Bonnell.

Cuyahoga App. No. 223820. On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. 11.06. Application denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2004 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2004

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To extend until July 1, 1998, the exemption from ineligibility based on 
   a high default rate for certain institutions of higher education.
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2004

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To extend until July 1, 1998, the exemption from ineligibility based on 
   a high default rate for certain institutions of higher education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    The matter preceding clause (i) of section 435(a)(2)(C) of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1085(a)(2)(C)) is amended by 
striking ``July 1, 1994'' and inserting ``July 1, 1998''.

            Passed the Senate March 25 (legislative day, February 22), 
      1994.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
# The Sleepy Tank

/ Published Jan. 14, 2021
OMAHA, Nebraska, 
*Defense Logistics Agency Energy worked with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District to demolish a fuel tank damaged by the unprecedented and historical March 2019 flooding in the Missouri and Platte River basins.*

*The following story is written by **Gregory Etter**, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Fueling Systems Mandatory Center of Expertise program manager. It was published in the January 2021 issue of the USACE Fueling Systems POL-MCX newsletter.*

----

Tank 11 was a small aboveground fuel storage tank constructed in 1958 at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, and held 210,000 gallons of jet fuel. Around 2015 the tank was cleaned, decommissioned, and sat waiting to be demolished.

Then in the Spring of 2019 unprecedented, unregulated levels of runoff across the Midwest infiltrated portions of Offutt AFB including its fueling storage and distribution system where the waters lifted Tank 11 off its foundation and tipped it onto its side. The Offutt community came to refer to it as “Sleepy Tank” because of the way it rested on the containment wall.

In October 2020 the USACE POL-MCX completed the demolition of the “Sleepy Tank” under a commercial services contract with A-Zone Environmental. Mr. Adam Little, POL-MCX Project Manager, noted that the demolition of Tank 11 went very smoothly.

“It’s not often we demolish a tank with such a wild story,” Little said. “DLA-Energy and Air Force were terrific partners, and our team really knocked it out of the park. Having a tank that was already decommissioned and vapor free really sped things up.”

Demolition of the “Sleepy Tank” occurred after USACE POL-MCX had completed time-critical repair actions on the Offutt AFB fueling system in response to the 2019 floods. On June 11, 2020 all repairs were completed and the fueling system was turned over to Offutt AFB. You can read more about this project in the July 2020 POL-MCX newsletter.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended August
16, 2009, (the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
Certificate of Trust of BNY Capital IX



 Exhibit 4.15 
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF 
 BNY CAPITAL IX 
 This Certificate of Trust of BNY Capital IX
(the “Trust”), is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act, 12 Del. C. §§ 3801 et seq. (the “Act”). 
 1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is BNY Capital IX. 
 2. Delaware Trustee. The name and the business address of the trustee of the Trust having its principal place of business in the State of
Delaware is Chase Bank USA, National Association, 500 Stanton Christiana Rd, 3/OPS 4, Newark, Delaware 19713, Attention: Worldwide Securities Services. 
 3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned being the trustees of the Trust, have duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act. 
 CHASE BANK USA, NATIONAL 
 ASSOCIATION, not in its individual capacity, but 
 solely as Delaware Trustee 
  

					
	 By:
	 	/s/ Diane P. Ledger    	  	  
	 Name: 
	 	 Diane P. Ledger
	  	
	 Title:
	 	 Assistant Vice President
	  	
	
	/s/ Thomas J. Mastro
	Thomas J. Mastro, as Regular Trustee
	
	/s/ John A. Park
	John A. Park, III, as Regular Trustee
2016-1036.

#### Clark v. Adult Parole Auth.

Belmont App. No. 16 BE 0006, 2016-Ohio-3383. Reported at 151 Ohio St.3d 622, 2017-Ohio-8391, 90 N.E.3d 909. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
#### William P. Curran, Appellant-Respondent, v Debra Curran, Respondent-Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 852]—

*392In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), entered July 2, 2002, as, after a nonjury trial, ordered him to pay child support in the sum of $356.18 per week based on imputed income of $76,000 per year, and failed to deduct from that imputed income the amount he was obligated to pay in support of his child born out of wedlock, failed to grant him a distributive award, and granted the defendant wife’s application for an attorney’s fee, and the defendant wife cross-appeals from the same judgment.

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned *(see*22 NYCRR 670.8 [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In determining a party’s child support obligation, a court need not rely upon the party’s own account of his or her finances, but may impute income based upon the party’s past income or demonstrated earning potential *(see Rocanello v Rocanello,*254 AD2d 269 [1998]). The plaintiff failed to provide evidentiary support, other than his own testimony, that he could not find employment commensurate with his prior income of $76,109, or that he was no longer able to engage in work equivalent to his former employment as a result of a disability *(see generally Mitgang v Mitgang,*284 AD2d 510, 511 [2001]; *Matter of Dallin v Dallin,*250 AD2d 847, 848 [1998]).

When calculating the basic child support obligation pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b) (b) (5), a court must deduct various items from a parent’s income, including child support that is “actually paid pursuant to court order or written agreement” for a child not the subject of the pending action (Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [5] [vii] [D]). However, in this case, there was no evidence that the plaintiff actually paid child support to the custodial parent of his child born out of wedlock pursuant to an order of support which was obtained with his consent two months prior to the trial in this action.

*393The plaintiffs contention that the defendant’s application for an attorney’s fee was untimely is unpreserved for appellate review, and in any event, is without merit.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Mc-Ginity, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.
#### Proskauer Rose LLP, Respondent, v Asia Electronics Holding Co., Inc., Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 771]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J), entered September 25, 2002, which, in an action to recover a legal fee, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant’s motion to amend its answer so as to assert, inter alia, counterclaims for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The proposed counterclaims for legal malpractice were correctly rejected as time-barred since defendant moved to amend more than three years after the alleged acts of malpractice (CPLR 214 [6]; *see McCoy v Feinman,*99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]). Supreme Court correctly rejected defendant’s allegations of breach of fiduciary duty as duplicative of the malpractice claim. We have considered and rejected defendant’s arguments that the relation-back and continuous representation doctrines save this action. Concur—Rosenberger, J.P., Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 31950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15492]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 1616


Proposed Technical Changes; Standard for the Flammability of 
Children's Sleepwear: Sizes 7 Through 14; Correction

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Proposed technical changes; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a table in a proposed rule published in 
the Federal Register of May 21, 1998, regarding technical changes to 
the flammability standard for children's sleepwear. The table showing 
the distance from the shoulder for upper arm measurement for sizes 7 
through 14 inadvertently omitted some fractions. This correction 
provides the complete and correct table. Due to the minor nature of 
this correction the Commission does not intend to extend the comment 
period for the proposed rule. However, if a commenter believes that 
additional time is necessary to comment due to the error, he/she may 
request an extension.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Neily, Project Manager, 
Directorate for Engineering Sciences, Consumer Product Safety 
Commission, Washington, D.C. 20207; telephone (301) 504-0508, extension 
1293.

Correction

    In proposed rule FR Doc. 98-13026, beginning on page 27877 in the 
issue of May 21, 1998, make the following correction. On page 27884, 
correct the table that follows Diagram 1 to read as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Distance from shoulder (G) to (H) for Upper Arm Measurement for Sizes 7 through 14               
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      7              8              9            10            11            12            13            14     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11.4 cm......       11.7 cm       11.9 cm       12.5 cm       12.8 cm        13.1cm        13.7cm        14.2cm 
4\1/2\''.....      4\5/8\''      4\3/4\''      4\7/8\''           5''      5\1/8\''      5\3/8\''      5\5/8\'' 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: June 4, 1998.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-15492 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 27, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00766-CV 

PHASE 2 OF THE BAILEY GROUP, Appellant 

V. 

GARY LEE HERMAN, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-03150-D 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

Appellant’s brief in this case has not been filed. By letter dated October 23, 

2023, we informed appellant that as a corporation, it must be represented by counsel. 

Appellant obtained counsel as directed and by order dated December 13, 2023, we 

struck the brief signed by appellant’s agent and ordered counsel to file appellant’s 

brief on or before January 12, 2024. 

By postcard dated February 8, 2024, we informed appellant its brief was 

overdue and directed the brief to be filed within ten days. We cautioned appellant 

that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. 
 –2– 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed its brief or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c). 

 

230766F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

PHASE 2 OF THE BAILEY 

GROUP, Appellant 

No. 05-23-00766-CV V. 

GARY LEE HERMAN, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-03150-

D. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Molberg and 

Goldstein participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered February 27, 2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hugo Melgurrero, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 271]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J. at plea; Eduardo Padro, J. at sentencing), rendered June 18, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.