alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# OSHA Safe + Sound Safety Campaign

/ Published Aug. 1, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Safety and Occupational Health Division will host the OSHA Safe + Sound Safety Campaign, an interactive, informational fair, Aug. 14 from 11a.m. -1p.m. in the Operations Center Buckeye and Cardinal rooms at the Defense Supply Center Columbus.

The annual event is held to raise awareness and understanding of the value of safety and health programs as part of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s nationwide campaign.

“DLA Shows commitment to safety through our Voluntary Protection Program ‘Star Safety’ and Occupational Health Management system which focuses on employee safety and occupational health training, encouragement of hazard identification, reporting and management,” said Land and Maritime Safety and Occupational Health Program manager Leslie Fox. “We recognize safety is everyone’s responsibility.”

Local safety organizations will be conducting interactive activities to include impaired vision simulators for driving, yard games and balance test and providing free educational items designed to engage associates and promote safety awareness.

“We’re excited to have several DSCC safety organizations participating in the 2019 Safe and Sound Safety Campaign,” Fox said.

“This year’s event includes multiple DSCC safety organizations: the Fire Department will be onsite to discuss fire prevention and are scheduled to conduct a fire extinguisher demonstration; Security Operations will discuss Emergency Action Plans and Disaster Preparedness and the Safety and Occupational Health Division will be providing general ladder safety tips and information on conducting a proper Job Hazard Analysis. Before departing the event, associates are encouraged to visit with our ergonomist who will be on site to share proper office chair adjustments and conduct ergonomic exercise demonstrations and we challenge associates to take part in a CPR contest being conducted by a licensed CPR & AED trainer,” she added.

The 2019 guest safety organizations and activities scheduled for the event are:
      - American Red Cross:  Providing information on swim, tornado and fire safety as well as disaster preparedness.
      - Franklin County Safe Communities:  Will have a distracted and impaired driving simulator, allowing associates to participate in motor skill games while wearing Impairment Goggles. Additionally there’ll be information available on car seat and traffic safety. 
      - Grainger:  Providing information on electrical safety for the layman.
      - The Walking Company:  Will be available to discuss comfortable dress, athletic and orthotic shoes.
      - Mount Carmel Hospital Falls and Balance Program:  Providing information on fall prevention and a balance plate machine.
      - Ohio Department of Natural Resources Watercrafts Division:  An ODNR Ranger Officer will be onsite to answer questions on boating safety and provided life jackets for associates to try on.
      - Wright Patterson, 88th Air Base Wing, Public Health, Medical Center-Food Safety:  Providing information on how to prepare food and prevent food borne illnesses.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan’s Foods, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the “Evaluation Date”); andc) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whetheror not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.     Date: September 28, 2005 /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir       Leonard R. Stein-Sapir    Chairman of the Board,    Chief Executive Officer
16
#### Andrew Sasson et al., Respondents, v TLG Acquisition LLC et al., Appellants.

[51 NYS3d 869]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. *460Rakower, J.), entered on July 6, 2016, in favor of plaintiffs, affirmed, without costs. Appeals from orders, same court and Justice, entered February 29 and March 10, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and awarded plaintiffs attorneys’s fees, dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The issue of the definition of the disputed term was expressly decided adversely to defendants by this Court in the prior appeal (127 AD3d 480 [1st Dept 2015]), and there is no basis for re-examination of this Court’s prior decision, which is law of the case. Therefore, in granting summary judgment to plaintiffs, the motion court correctly determined that it was bound by this Court’s prior decision *(see e.g. Arkin Kaplan Rice LLP v Kaplan,*138 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2016]).

The court properly awarded attorneys’ fees to plaintiffs pursuant to the terms of the parties’ transactional documents, and we perceive no basis to disturb the court’s calculations of interest due to plaintiffs.

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Feinman, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.

Friedman, J.R, and Richter, J.,

concur in a separate memorandum by Richter, J., as follows: In the prior appeal, I joined the concurring opinion which concluded that because the provision in question is reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation, its meaning may not properly be determined as a matter of law (127 AD3d 480, 484 [1st Dept 2015]). Although I continue to believe the disputed term is ambiguous, I recognize that that issue was expressly decided adversely to defendants, and thus is law of the case warranting summary judgment in plaintiffs’ favor.
2017-1205.

#### In re C.D.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-784. Motion for stay and motion to consolidate denied.

O’Neill, J., dissents and would accept the cause and grant the motion for stay and the motion to consolidate.
#### Com. v. Creach

04/04/2016

6 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 656
No. 09-10764.

#### Ellis Carlyle Davis, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 851, 131 S. Ct. 107,

178 L. Ed. 2d 66,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6015,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit      32**

**Section      1350 Certification of Periodic Report**

**By      the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1.   | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ALLETE for the quarterly period                ended                September 30, 2007, (Report) fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);                and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                ALLETE. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
2017-0232.

#### State v. Smith.

Hamilton App. No. C-150691.

Fischer and DeWine, jj., not participating.
#### Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Anderson

1st Dept: 133 AD3d 540

denied
# America’s Army: When We are Needed, We are There

/ Published June 15, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Let us all join in a moment of reflection and celebration in honor of the U.S. Army’s 245th Birthday, which was celebrated on Sunday, June 14.  The U.S. Army was officially created on June 14, 1775, over a year prior to the Declaration of Independence, when Congress approved the raising of six companies of riflemen to enlist in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia until the end of the Revolutionary War.  The Army has grown in size and capability since its humble beginnings in the nation’s struggle for independence against Great Britain and is now the largest branch of the U.S. military. 

This year the Army’s Birthday was themed, “America’s Army: When We are Needed, We are There.”  This message is very appropriate and encompassing of the Army in our current environment and throughout the nation’s history.  It serves as a reminder of the Soldiers currently stationed throughout the world and those Soldiers that were ‘there’ before them.  The theme is also a good reminder of the diversity of support the Army provides to so many needs, which can range from an infantry squad closing width and destroying an enemy, to a Security Forces Assistance Brigade being a force multiplier through training, to logistics trains, to one of the many Army Corps of Engineers projects throughout the United States or an Army Medical Brigade supporting the COVID-19 Response.  The U.S. Army also has a long history of providing domestic support to the homeland through the U.S. Army National Guard.  Time and time again the Army has responded to the nations ‘needs’ and Soldiers are ‘there’ whether it be the beaches of Normandy, the mountains of Afghanistan, or a New York City hospital. 

Please thank a Soldier and know the proud men and women of the U.S. Army continue to provide peace and security for all of us.
#### William O., Matter of, v John A.

3d Dept: 148 AD3d 1258

denied
# Riverview Golf Course Unveils Monument in Honor of 60th Anniversary 

/ Published June 27, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
The Riverview Golf Course at Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna celebrated its 60th unveiling ceremony Saturday, June 15. The Morale Welfare Recreation Office hosted a four-person scramble to unveil its new monument, which is a plaque to acknowledge the Riverview Golf Course’s 60 years of success. Col. James M. Callis, commander, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, and former MWR Division Chief Tom Zerbe, unveiled the plaque, which reads, “In remembrance of beloved members, patrons, and employees no longer with us.”The Cedar Cliff Color Guard opened the ceremony with a presentation of colors, followed by the playing of the national anthem. Donald Raider, a member of the Cumberland County Honor Guard, played taps. Col. Callis gave his remarks on how Riverview Golf Course has not only impacted the installation, but impacted the community as well.“So while this course is small in comparison to many military courses, it’s been a part of the installation’s history. For the past 60 years, the golf-season at the Riverview Golf Course has featured a wide-variety of themed scrambles and tournaments, leagues and clinics, corporate golf outing opportunities to installation employees and the surrounding communities,” he says. “Thank you all again for coming out today to recognize this 60th Anniversary milestone on the installation...good luck to our golfers...and enjoy your day!”The Riverview Golf Course is located on the Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna installation. It was originally constructed in 1959 by Royce Hewitt. Since its opening, the Riverside Golf Course has undergone many changes over the years. However, it is a perfect course for novices, as well as challenging enough for the most seasoned golfer. The golf course is along the stunning coast of the Susquehanna River, offering a beautiful view of the surrounding countryside. The course is open to the entire community, not just military and government personnel. However, non-military/government patrons are required to complete a security screening process for access.The tournament consisted of teams of four. All participants consisted of both military personnel and civilians. All golf participants received a 60th Year Anniversary Celebration commemorative item for participating. First, second, and third placed teams received additional awards.
No. 12-7439.

#### LaFleur *v.*Texas.

Ct. App. Tex., 9th Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### Com. v. Homan

12/16/2015

532 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1129
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Millipore Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, Martin D. Madaus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kathleen B.
Allen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ MARTIN D. MADAUS *                    
|Martin D. Madaus                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer     
|May 9, 2007                               
|                                          
|/s/ KATHLEEN B. ALLEN *                   
|Kathleen B. Allen                         
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|May 9, 2007                               

---

|* | - A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Millipore Corporation and will be retained by Millipore Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

A pplication of : RECURRENT TRAINING CENTER, INC.

FAA Order No. 2011

- 12

Docket No. CP10GL0010

FDMS No. FAA

- 2010

- 0973 1

Served: November 22, 2011

ORDER DISMISSING AP PEAL

AND REMANDING MATTER TO

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 2

Applicant Recurrent Training Center (“Recurrent”) appealed from the written

initial decision by Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin, holding that the

FAA’s position in the underlying civil p enalty action 3 was substantially justified, and

denying Recurrent’s application under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 5 U.S.C.

§ 504. In its reply brief, the FAA conceded, after “in

- depth review,” that it was not

substantially justified in proceed ing with the underlying civil penalty action.

(Complainant’s Reply Brief at 4.) The FAA argued further that the EAJA award sought

by Recurrent was excessive and requested that the Administrator resolve the issues

regarding the amount of legal and agent f ees and other expenses that should be awarded

1 Generally, materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials filed in security cases) are also available for viewing at http://www.regulations.gov . 14 C.F.R. § 13.21 0(e)(1).

2 The Administrator’s civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the rules of practice, and other information, are available on the Internet at the following address: www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol _adjudication/AGC400/Civil _Penalty/

. See 14 C.F.R. § 13.210(e)(2). In addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions . Finally, the decisions are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw (FTRAN

- FAA database). For additional information, see the

Web site.

3 FAA Docket No. CP09GL0008; FDMS No. FAA

- 2009

- 0971.2

to Recurrent

. However, neither the ALJ in his initial decision nor Recurrent in its appeal

brief addressed any issue other than whether the FAA’s position in the underlying

litigation was substantially justifi ed. Hence, Recurrent’s appeal is dismissed

, and this

matter is remanded to the ALJ for further proceedings as necessary to resolve the

remaining issues regarding the proper award under the EAJA

. 4

[Original signed by J. Randolph Babbitt]

J. RAN DOLPH BABBITT

ADMINISTRATOR

Federal Aviation Administration

4 In light of this order, there is no need to rule upon Recurrent’s request to file an additional brief, which was opposed by Complainant.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-114-008]


Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

June 3, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 1, 1998, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to become effective 
June 1, 1998:

Third Revised Sheet No. 232A
Second Revised Sheet No. 232B

    Equitrans states that this filing is made in compliance with Order 
No. 587. Equitrans states that the Commission previously granted them a 
one year extension of time, until June 1, 1998, to meet the imbalance 
reporting requirements established by GISB on its gathering system. 
Since the Commission's order, Equitrans has installed certain 
facilities and made certain enhancements to its gas management system 
which enable it to provide imbalance reports to all customers by the 
ninth business day after the close of the month.
    Equitrans states that it is currently fully complying with GISB 
standards on imbalance reporting, and has been since late 1997. This 
filing is intended solely to revise Section 12(a)(i) of its General 
Terms and Conditions, to provide that imbalance reports to all 
customers will be provided by the ninth business day following the 
close of the month, consistent with GISB standards and Equitrans' 
current practice.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15220 Filed 6-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Investment Retrievers, Inc., Respondent, v Ernest L. Fox, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 662]

In an action, in effect, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mayer, J.), dated September 17, 2014, as denied that branch of his cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The essential elements of a cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract are the existence of a contract, the plaintiff’s performance pursuant to the contract, the defendant’s breach of its contractual obligations, and damages resulting from the breach (see *Gawrych v Astoria Fed. Sav. & Loan,*148 AD3d 681 [2017]; *Meyer v North Shore-Long Is. Jewish Health Sys., Inc.,*137 AD3d 878, 879 [2016]; *Carione v Hickey,*133 AD3d 811 [2015]). Here, in support of that branch of his cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that he did not enter into a “lease agreement” on an “Auto Finance line account” with the plaintiff’s predecessor, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as alleged in the complaint (see *Brandeis Sch., Inc. v Yakobowicz,*130 AD3d 850, 851 [2015]; *Moezinia v Ashkenazi,*105 AD3d 920, 921 [2013]). However, in opposition, the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact, inter alia, as to whether the defendant' *1091entered into an agreement and breached that agreement by failing to repay a debt due and owing in the sum of $86,271.68 *(see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.

Rivera, J.R, Austin, Miller and Barros, JJ., concur.