alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of American Independent Insurance Co., Appellant, v Nova Acupuncture, P.C., et al., Respondents.

Submitted January *9,*2017;

decided March 28, 2017

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
No. 09-11535.

#### Ron Waterman, Petitioner v. Washington.

562 U.S. 886, 131 S. Ct. 217,

178 L. Ed. 2d 130,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6901.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1, denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Preston Golden, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 313]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered June 4, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of seven years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s arguments concerning his motion to suppress are indistinguishable from arguments this Court rejected on a codefendant’s appeal *(People v Norman,*304 AD2d 405 [2003]), and there is no reason to reach a different result herein. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Ellerin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000065666
<NAME> MICHIGAN RIVET CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          83,893
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,053,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,580,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,562,290
<PP&E>                                      26,950,388
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,844,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,716,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,475,040
<BONDS>                                      1,904,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       638,525
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,643,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,716,437
<SALES>                                     23,148,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,148,846
<CGS>                                       19,585,704
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,585,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,772,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             132,853
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,658,019
<INCOME-TAX>                                   563,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,095,019
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,095,019
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.71


</TABLE>
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Price of Freeport, TX Natural Gas LNG Imports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Price of Freeport, TX Natural Gas LNG Imports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun   | Jul   | Aug | Sep   | Oct   | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | --- | ----- | ----- | --- | ---
|2014                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     | 12.95 | 14.71 |     |       |       |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|2015                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |       |       |     |       | 15.12 |     |    
|2018                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |       |       |     | 11.92 |       |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Com. v. Afshar

12/07/2015

276 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1132
DoT- os r:- :J. 003 - 1'17 U3 


Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: Gloria Trombly [TromG@twcny.rr.com] 


Sent: Tue~day, February 16, 2010 8:30 PM 


Td:'·' .. Dayany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) 


Subject: Plattsburgh, N.Y. airport 


.". '.{""~,~:::_ .i h 

ASa'taxpayer of Clinton County, New York I object to the change in air carriers being made in Plattsburgh. Cape Air has 

a good record and does npt fly at full capacity. There is no need to use a larger plane with more expensive rates. I think 

there was trickery done to get it passed and should not be allowed to change . 

... 

1
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 128952 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, ZANTEL MARKETING AGENCY, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 128952 COA: 248313 Wayne CC: 00-019274-CK WHITESELL CORPOR ATION, f/k/a WHITESELL MANUFA CTURING, and WHITESELL OF MICHIGAN, INC., Defendants-Appellees,

and

WILLIAM WHITAKER and STAMPTECH OF MICHIGAN, INC., Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 29, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
# DLA Land and Maritime Timeline of the Past 60 Years

/ Published Oct. 20, 2021
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime based at the Defense Supply Center Columbus has a long history of support to our nation’s forces. The installation was dedicated in 1918 to expedite shipments of supplies to troops serving with the Allied Expeditionary Force in France during World War I and on January 1, 1963, the installation was assigned to the Defense Supply Agency (now the Defense Logistics Agency) and combined with the Defense Construction Supply Center. Although the installation name has changed many times throughout the years, the mission remains the same — to support American’s Armed Forces and her allies. See the timeline for some of the Central Ohio logistics center's key moments in the early days of the agency.
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Price of Kenai, AK Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to China (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Price of Kenai, AK Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to China (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | --     | 10.61  | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 09-11215.

#### Guy E. Smith, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 867, 131 S. Ct. 161,

178 L. Ed. 2d 96,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6888.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, denied.

Same case below, 26 So. 3d 597.
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|U.S. Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|U.S. Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 396,950 | 396,092
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 364,228 | 363,521 | 367,108 | 453,054 | 452,044 | 452,287 | 452,467 | 413,475 | 404,646 | 403,810
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 403,747 | 403,747 | 402,407 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
# Reservists put their training to work

/ Published Sept. 2, 2020
WARNER ROBINS, Georgia, 
Reservists spent mid-July putting their training requirements to work meeting Defense Logistics Agency needs.

Members of Disposition Service Units 2 and 5 reported to the DLA Disposition Services at Warner Robins, Georgia, to process property turned in at the site and prepare for future operations when they might support DLA in a disaster or contingency operation. Area Manager Mike Kelly said the 11 soldiers, sailors and airmen of the two DSUs concentrated on performing kind, count and condition reviews of 2,293 turn-in documents identifying property worth an estimated $18.3 million. Additionally, materials for 1,480 orders were picked, packaged and staged for shipment.

“The augmentation that this team provided helped to clear the way for additional mission essential workload,” Kelly said. “We are expecting a second round of support from our warfighters in the months to come and are excited to have them back on the ground with us.” 

Reservists were also trained on the reutilization, transfer and donation process, the role of the disposal service representative, and handling special equipment during the two-week timeframe.

Army Sgt. 1st Class Raphael Berrios, DSU-2’s senior enlisted leader, said he knows the value of the experience for reservists and DLA since he works for DLA Disposition Services as the site manager at Fort Benning, Georgia, when not serving in Army Reserve. Berrios said the training was effective because of the hands-on experience with a large operation and supporting different tasks.

“Some had the opportunity to go out with a DSR, visit local customers and assist them in the turn in of items,” Berrios said.

Additional training was also provided in the Digital DSR website, which Berrios said his comrades use to demonstrate to future customers who sometimes need help to make an appointment, complete necessary paperwork and understand the certifications required to turn in items. He said the site also shows where to find the regulations and the points of contact for the different services that DLA provides.

Reservists assisted real customers with real needs who were picking up items that had been requisitioned for reuse. Others that were licensed on operated material handling equipment, like forklifts, prepared items for shipment from Warner Robins.

“Overall, the mission was a success, and it gave the service members the opportunity to engage and experience the DLA mission outside of their usual support on the weekends,” Berrios said.

Berrios said he feels the training using real operations prepares reservists so well for the DLA mission when deploying overseas that it should be an additional requirement of the service member’s training once that member has been identified for deployment.

“Using reservists to help with the backlog at our sites just makes sense,” Berrios said. “The sites get free help and the reservists receive additional job training so they are more effective when they deploy.”
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies to my knowledgethat the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification isprovided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or “filed” for anypurpose whatsoever.     Date: August 14, 2007 Name: /s/ Russell Van Zandt         Russell Van Zandt
Exhibit 99.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Robert L. Demorest, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, the Quarterly
Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of MOCON, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to MOCON, Inc. and will be retained by MOCON,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                  By: /s/ Robert L. Demorest
                                      ---------------------------
                                  Name:   Robert L. Demorest
                                  Title:  Chief Executive Officer


I, Dane D. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, the Quarterly
Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of MOCON, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to MOCON, Inc. and will be retained by MOCON,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                  By: /s/ Dane D. Anderson
                                      ---------------------------
                                  Name:   Dane D. Anderson
                                  Title:  Chief Financial Officer
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 13, 2014 518391 

________________________________

In the Matter of BURNELL A.

McLEOD, 

Petitioner, 

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner

of Corrections and Community 

Supervision, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 16, 2014

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________

Burnell A. McLeod, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of respondent which found petitioner

guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was observed attempting to stab another inmate

with a shank during a melee in the prison yard and, as a result,

was charged in a misbehavior report with disobeying a direct

order, fighting, creating a disturbance, possession of a weapon

and violent conduct. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing,

petitioner was found guilty of all charges. However, on

administrative appeal the charges of disobeying a direct order

and fighting were dismissed. Thereafter, petitioner commenced

this CPLR article 78 proceeding. 
-2- 518391 

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the

misbehavior report, testimony at the hearing from correction

officers who witnessed the event and documentary evidence

submitted at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support

the determination of guilt (see Matter of Hill v Fischer, 69 AD3d

1103, 1103 [2010]; Matter of Williams v Goord, 23 AD3d 972, 973

[2005]). Any alleged inconsistencies in the testimony or

evidence created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to

resolve (see Matter of Key v Fischer, 72 AD3d 1365, 1366 [2010]). 

We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions,

including his claim of hearing officer bias, and find them to be

without merit. 

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ.,

concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1
   
  THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906
 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
   
   Dated:  May 10, 2011
  /s/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
 Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
 President and Chairman of the Board