alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# National Hispanic Heritage Month Spotlight: Manuel Arceo

/ Published Oct. 3, 2022
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
In honor of National Hispanic Heritage Month, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution spotlights Manuel Arceo, a supervisory supply systems analyst at DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California.

The Defense Department pays tribute to the generations of Hispanic and Latino Americans who have enriched the nation’s history and who continue to be pivotal to the success of the country. Hispanics and Latinos include all Americans who can trace their ancestry back to Spain, Mexico, the Caribbean and Central and South America.

Arceo believes that it is extremely important to recognize National Hispanic Heritage Month because it spotlights the achievements and contributions all Hispanic Americans have made throughout history.

“National Hispanic Heritage Month means a lot to me because it brings to light the achievements and contributions of all Hispanic Americans that have come before me, to include those in my family, that made it possible for me to become the person I am today,” he said. “It allows them to be celebrated as such.”

One thing unique about Arceo’s heritage is how his great grandparents immigrated here from Mexico.

“Both sets of my great grandparents immigrated to the United States from Mexico. And with that, they brought with them their tradition of family first and mentality of hard work. Both my wife and I raised three children and now have three beautiful granddaughters, who I love spending time with. Without my great grandparents passing down their tradition of family first and the mentality of hard work, I would not be where I am today.”

While it is important to Arceo for DLA to recognize this month, it is also important to him that the DLA Distribution workforce recognizes why we are celebrating this month to begin with.

“It is very important to me that National Hispanic Heritage Month is recognized because it highlights the accomplishments of Hispanic Americans within DLA as well,” he said. “My takeaway would be to recognize those who came before you year-round. Not just in the month set aside. Their contributions and achievements are something that paved the way for all of us to become the person we are today.”
#### New York Marine and General Insurance Company, Appellant, v Jorgensen & Company et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[57 NYS3d 150]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered April 4, 2016 which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant Jorgensen & Company’s motion to dismiss the claims for an injunction and the subrogation claims and to compel arbitration of the remaining claims against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court correctly determined that the claims asserted against defendant Jorgensen, which plaintiff describes as essentially alleging “fraud and intentionally dishonest conduct,” *638are subject to arbitration pursuant to the broad arbitration clause in the parties’ Program Management Agreement *(see e.g. Szabados v Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of N.Y.,*174 AD2d 342 [1st Dept 1991]). The complaint does not allege fraud in the inducement of the arbitration clause or fraud permeating the entire agreement *(see Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats],*61 NY2d 299, 307-308 [1984]).

The court also correctly dismissed the disgorgement claim as subsumed within claims to be resolved by the arbitrator, and the claims for injunctive relief and subrogation are without merit.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Webber, Gesmer and Kern, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Grazyna S.-G., Appellant, v Evelina G., Respondent.

[48 NYS3d 586]

Order and judgment (one paper), Family Court, New York County (Pamela Scheininger, Ref.), entered on or about May 20, 2015, which, upon petitioner daughter’s default, granted respondent mother’s motion to dismiss the petition seeking an order of protection against respondent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to the Referee’s conclusion, petitioner did not default; petitioner testified at the fact-finding hearing and her attorney appeared on May 20, 2015 and objected to the dismissal of the petition *(see Schlain v Women’s Radiology,*305 AD2d 173, 174 [1st Dept 2003]). In any event, petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case that respondent’s actions constituted the family offenses of harassment in the second degree or disorderly conduct *(see Matter of Kirsten G. v Melvin G.,*143 AD3d 614, 614 [1st Dept 2016]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Kahn, JJ.
# Local art contest showcases veteran creations

/ Published Aug. 20, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Veteran created artwork was on full display within the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center as part of an annual art show. The artwork consisted of entries into the National Veterans Creative Arts Festival and ranged from paintings and photos to sculptures and quilt work. 

The festival in its present format began in 1989, designed to showcase the artistic achievements of veterans from around the country. It features five artistic divisions including the art exhibit which has 51 categories.

                Veteran Art Show                            Congressman Peter Meijer, U.S. House of Representatives, Michigan 3rd District and Michael Cannon, the director of the Defense Logistics Agency observe National Veterans Creative Arts Festival entries on display within the Hart-Doyle-Inouye Federal Center.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 210817-D-OS362-037“This is an annual event, and this is the first year partnering with [Morale Welfare and Recreation],” said Pamela Dickinson, the local coordinator for the National Creative Arts Festival. “This was a great opportunity to get some more exposure, and also to include the patrons here at the Federal Center who don’t know about this competition.”

Due to the prior year’s quarantining and limitations on the amount of people within the building the participation in the show was more limited than in the past. But the newfound partnership between the U.S Department of Veterans Affairs and MWR was still considered a success in promoting the local art show in Battle Creek.

“Getting the word out that there are art shows that can show what you’ve been through and your journey, said Amanda Gentis, Battle Creek’s MWR event planner as discussed the goal of the program. “We had a pretty good turnout. I think it was a really good outcome and I really loved [the artwork]. I helped judge a few of the pieces and you really fall in love with the meaning behind some of these pieces.”

It’s the meaning behind these pieces of art that allows everyone who sees the artwork a glimpse into the lives of the veterans who created them.

“To hear their stories, it’s amazing,” Dickinson said. “We are just honored to be able to display their work and that someone is interested in hearing their stories.”

Participants that earn first place in the local competitions, move on to the national competition. Those who make it to the finals engage in a week of activities including listening to speakers and participating in different therapeutic events.
---

---

# Exhibit 15.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852 and No. 333-136684 on
Form S-8 of our reports dated June 30 ,2008 relating to (1) the consolidated financial
statements of Elbit Imaging Ltd. ( the company) which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to claims that have
been filed against Group companies and for some of those claims petitions have been filed
for certification as class actions, and (2) the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.Brightman Almagor & Co.
Certified Public Accountants
A member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Tel-Aviv, Israel
June 30, 2008



---

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
      (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
      the undersigned officers of CommercePlanet, Inc., a Utah corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
      Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-KSB”)
      of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
                March 1, 2007/s/
                Michael HillMichael
                Hill*Chief
                Executive Officer*Date:
                March 1, 2007/s/
                David FoucarDavid
                Foucar*Chief
                Financial Officer*
# DLA conducts spill prevention exercise at Kirtland AFB

/ Published June 30, 2021
KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE, N.M., 
The Defense Logistics Agency partnered with Kirtland’s environmental professionals to host its annual spill prevention exercise. This training is open to all base personnel that are either a part of a spill response team or handle spills reports, petroleum, oils, and lubricants on a regular basis. The training covered operation and maintenance of equipment; discharge procedure protocols; applicable pollution control laws; rules and regulations; general facility operations; spill prevention plan and ended with a Bulk Fuels Facility walk through and spill demonstration.Large containers of water were brought to the BFF and used to simulate spills demonstrating to the exercise participants what a 5 gallon, 30 gallon, and 55 gallon spill looks like as it absorbs into the dirt. A check on learning was conducted ensuring trainees knew what to do in the event of a spill.The advantages of an effective spill prevention exercise is that it equips response personnel with the knowledge and skills to prevent, mitigate and act in the event of a spill, and decreases the likelihood of hazardous leaks and contamination of water.This requirement can generally be met through the KAFB SPCC Plan & Spill Prevention Training available on TEACH.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Kirtland Air Force Base website.*
# DLA 60th Anniversary Shout Out: Navy CAPT Justin Lewis, DLA Distribution Norfolk

/ Published Sept. 24, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
00:14VIDEO  | 00:14 |DLA 60th Anniversary Shout Out: Navy CAPT Justin Lewis, DLA Distribution Norfolk

DLA 60th Anniversary Shout Out: Navy CAPT Justin Lewis, DLA Distribution Norfolk, sends a shout out to DLA for the 60th Anniversary.
Exhibit 10.1


    
      

      

    

    

      FOURTH
        AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT

      


      


      THIS
        FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is entered into as of
        May
        31, 2006 by and between UTAH MEDICAL PRODUCTS, a Utah corporation ("Borrower"),
        and U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("Bank").

      


      Recitals

      


      A.
        Borrower and Bank have entered into that certain Loan Agreement (the
“Agreement”) dated as of July 3, 2002 and related documents (as amended by a
        First Amendment thereto, a Second Amendment thereto, and a Third Amendment
        thereto) pursuant to which Bank has agreed to extend certain credit to Borrower
        in accordance with its terms. Capitalized terms shall have the meanings given
        by
        the Agreement unless otherwise defined.

      


      B.
        Borrower and Bank wish to extend the Loan termination date under the Agreement
        and the maturity date under the Note to May 31, 2008.

      


      Agreement

      


      NOW,
        THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained herein, and each intending
        to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:

      


      1.
        The
        Agreement and the other Loan Documents are hereby amended to provide that
        the
        Loan termination date (and the maturity date under the Note) shall be extended
        to May 31, 2008.

      


      2.
        Borrower hereby acknowledges the continued validity and enforceability of
        the
        Loan Documents, as amended hereby, and acknowledges that Borrower has no
        defense, claim or counterclaim with respect to its Obligations under the
        Loan
        Documents. 

      


      3.
        All
        other terms of the Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall remain valid
        and
        enforceable as modified hereby.

      


      4.
        This
        Amendment may be executed in counterparts.

      


      IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as
        of the
        day and year first above written.

      


      
        	
                UTAH
                  MEDICAL PRODUCTS

              	
                U.
                  S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

              
	 	 
	 	 
	
                By: 
                  /s/ Kevin L.
                  Cornwell                          
                  

              	
                By:
                  /s/ David P.
                  Williams                                 
                  

              
	 	 
	
                Its: 
                  CEO                                                   
                  

              	
                Its:
                   Vice
                  President
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Elizabeth A. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/  Elizabeth A. Murphy

Elizabeth A. Murphy
Chief Financial Officer
May 8, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and will be retained by
Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 09-10530.

#### Brian Darnell Edwards, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 845, 131 S. Ct. 87,

178 L. Ed. 2d 55,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5991.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Harrington West Financial
Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigneds best knowledge and belief:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 12th day of November 2003.

| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | Harrington West Financial Group, Inc.
| |  |                                      
| |  | /s/ Craig J. Cerny                   
| |  |                                      
| |  | Craig J. Cerny                       
| |  | Chief Executive Officer              
| |  |                                      
| |  | /s/ Sean Callow                      
| |  |                                      
| |  | Sean Callow                          
| |  | Chief Financial Officer              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicholas W. Weidow, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 236]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Cawley, J.), rendered April 23, 2014, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

In 2011, defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of rape in the third degree. He was sentenced to 10 years of probation. In 2014, defendant was charged with violating the terms of his probation as a result of being unsuccessfully discharged from his drug treatment program. Thereafter, County Court resentenced defendant to IV2 years in prison followed by 10 years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the imposition of the maximum period of postrelease supervision was harsh and excessive. We disagree. Given the nature of the underlying crime and the inability of defendant to abide by the terms of his probation, we find no abuse of discretion by County Court nor the existence of any extraordinary circumstances that would warrant a reduction of the period of postrelease supervi*1489sion in the interest of justice *(see People v Colon,*136 AD3d 471, 472 [2016], *lvs denied*27 NY3d 904, 1067 [2016]; *People v Watson,*115 AD3d 1016, 1017 [2014], *lv denied*24 NY3d 965 [2014]).

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
---

|CERTIFICATION                                
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip Kotze, Chief Executive Officer of Anooraq Resources
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| | By:    | /s/ P. Kotze           
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Philip Kotze           
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | July 9, 2009           

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMEN TAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200

Dallas Texas 75202 - 2733

December 23, 2010

Open Letter to Permit Holders and Interested Members of the Public:

I am writing to notify you of the actions the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking to ensure that as of January 2, 2011, businesses in Texas will be able to obtain, in a timely way, federal air construction and ope rating permits meeting the Clean Air Act’s requirements for greenhouse gases. Companie s who have a PSD permit pending now at the

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), expect to be filing one in the near future, or might be major sources of greenhouse gases should contact EPA to discuss their potential obligation to obtain a PSD permit for GHG emis sions. GHG permitting in Texas will be handled directly by EPA beginning on January 2, 2011.

As you know, the Clean Air Act allows states to implement certain elements of the federal Clean Air Act, one of which is the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program for major sources of federally regulated air pollutants. TCEQ has implemented an EPA-approved PSD program since 1992. As a direct result of the Supreme

Court’s Massachusetts vs EPA decision, beginning on January 2, 2011, greenhouse gases will become newly regulated air po llutants under the Clean Air Act. On December 10, 2010, the D.C. Circuit Court confirmed that EPA's greenhouse ga s regulations shall remain in effect and enforceable pending completion of any future judicial reviews. Therefore, it is incumbent on EPA to take action now to ensure that permitti ng authorities have the ability to issue, and covered sources the ability to obtain, the n ecessary greenhouse gas permits beginning on that date. Specifically, the Act requires that sources emitting greenhous e gases over certain quantities must obtain a PSD preconstruction permit for their emissions of those pollutants. EPA has been in communication with state and local air permitti ng agencies, including the TCEQ, over the past year to ensure that they will be in a position to issue PSD permits for greenhouse gasses or, if not, a federal plan is in place so as to avoid de lays for businesses wishing to build new or expand existing sources.

Earlier this month, EPA issued a final rule with a determination that the permitting programs for 13 states, including Te xas, are not adequate because they do not apply PSD to greenhouse gas emissions, 75 Fed. Reg. 77698 (Dec. 13, 2010). In that final rule, EPA also included a “SIP call” requiring these state agen cies to revise their PSD state implementation plans (SIPs) to include greenhouse gases. However, state officials in Texa s have made clear, in

letters to EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, statements in the me dia, and in legal challenges to EPA’s greenhouse gas rules, (inclu ding the recent challenge to the SIP Call rule) that they have