alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




Axion
      Power International, Inc.


3601
      Clover Lane


NewCastle,
      PA 16105




We
      consent to the inclusion of the financial statements of Axion Power
      International, Inc. and our report dated April 3, 2008, with respect to the
      consolidated financial statements and schedules of Axion Power International,
      Inc included in its Annual Report (Form 10KSB) for the years ended December
      31,
      2007 and 2006, and for the period for the date of inception (September 18,
      2003)
      through December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.









Rochester,
      New York


April
      3, 2008
---

---

Exhibit 12.3

Certification of
Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a),as adopted pursuant
to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

I, Shimon Yitzhaki,
certify that:

| | 1. | I
have reviewed this Amendment no. 2 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Elbit
                    Imaging Ltd.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Based
on my knowledge, this Amendment no. 2 to the annual report does not
                    contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact                     necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which                     such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by                     this report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 17, 2008

| |  | By: /s/ Shimon Yitzhaki
Shimon Yitzhaki, President
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### Justyce HH., Matter of (Andrew II.)

3d Dept: 151 AD3d 1129 (Proceeding No. 2)

denied
# Women’s History Month Spotlight: Chaletta McCoy

/ Published March 16, 2020
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
*Editor’s note: The Defense Logistics Agency recognizes March as Women’s History Month. In honor of women’s contributions to the agency’s global mission, DLA is highlighting female employees who work day in and day out to provide logistics support to America’s warfighters.*

**My name is:** Chaletta McCoy

**I am:** Staff director for the DLA Human Resources Human Capital Program Development Team

**Describe your job in a sentence:** I direct the development of human capital strategies and initiatives such as strategic workforce planning and organizational culture by providing program guidance, oversight and evaluation through coordination with management, HR specialists and various internal and external DLA customers.

**How long have you worked at DLA?** 26 years.

**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?** The career development opportunities available to the DLA workforce, such as rotational programs, executive development programs, build your roadmap to success leadership forum, and in-person and online training. I have participated in many of these and they have greatly assisted in getting me to where I am now. Also, as a staff director, I have had several enterprise rotational program assignees from across the DLA enterprise work in my office over the years. It’s a great opportunity for the assignees to get exposure to other work experiences and build connections. 

**What are your best memories of working here?** The DLA Human Resources Thanksgiving luncheons at the Headquarters over the years. It’s not just about the food, but the camaraderie that is cultivated within our directorate. During the Thanksgiving luncheons, our senior leaders serve food to the workforce. It’s a way of showing our thanks for the continued great work our employees perform year after year. 

**How do you make a difference?** Helping others in their career development by being a mentor, informally and formally. The development of others is important to me. I am blessed to have had mentors throughout my career who took the time to listen to me, and shared their knowledge and experiences with me. Everyone needs an advocate.

**What does Women’s History Month mean to you?** A time of remembering the sacrifices and contributions of so many women throughout history. I am appreciative of their sacrifices that have provided many opportunities for women throughout the world.
2017-0304.

#### State ex rel. Bucher v. Stephens.

Butler App. No. CA2017-02-024. On appellant’s application for dismissal. Application granted. Cause dismissed.
#### Elsayed v Edrees

2d Dept: 141 AD3d 503

denied
Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 registration numbers 333-57881, 333-41477 and 333-57879) pertaining to
the Amended and Restated 1992 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1996 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, and the 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan, respectively, of EPIX
Medical, Inc. of our report dated February 3, 1999, with respect to the
financial statements of EPIX Medical, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 1999
No. 09-11407.

#### Walter Babb, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 878, 131 S. Ct. 193,

178 L. Ed. 2d 116,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6714.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 503.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13809]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

Statement of Organization, Functions and Delegations of Authority

    Part F, of the Statement of Organization, Functions, and 
Delegations of Authority of the Department of Health and Human 
Services, Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), 49 FR 34247, 
dated September 6, 1984, is amended to include the following delegation 
of authority from the Secretary to the Administrator, HCFA, for the 
Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986.
     Section F.30., Delegations of Authority is amended by 
adding the following paragraph:
    TT. The authorities vested in the Secretary by the Stevenson-Wydler 
Technology Innovation Act of 1980, as amended by the Federal Technology 
Transfer Act of 1986, the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 and subsequent amendments.
    This delegation shall be exercised under the Department's existing 
delegation of authority and policy on regulations. In addition, I 
hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the HCFA Administrator or 
other HCFA officials which, in effect, involved the exercise of this 
authority prior to the effective date of this delegation.
    This delegation is effective immediately.

    Dated: May 15, 1998.
Donna E. Shalala,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 98-13809 Filed 5-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-M
```
1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-3915

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Walter Lee Anderson, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 13, 2004 Filed: February 18, 2005

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Walter Lee Anderson appeals the revocation of his federal supervised release and subsequent resentencing by the District Court 1 after testing positive for cocaine. Anderson's counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), identifying six issues that "might arguably support" Anderson's appeal. Id. at 744.-2- Having conducted an independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we conclude there are no nonfrivolous issues. We therefore affirm the judgment of the District Court and grant counsel's motion to withdraw.

______________________________
No. 09-11565.

#### Rickey Sabedra, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 804, 131 S. Ct. 222,

178 L. Ed. 2d 6,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7825.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).
# Eglin staff puts fallen Osprey to rest

/ Published March 3, 2020
Hurlburt Field, Florida, 
Defense Logistics Agency employees at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, processed the wreckage from a 2012 aircraft mishap through a different disposal route than many other airframes.

An Air Force Special Operations Command release stated, a CV-22 Osprey, assigned to the 1st Special Operations Wing, Hurlburt Field, Florida, was flying in a two-ship formation when it crashed at approximately 6:45 p.m. during a routine training mission north of Navarre, Florida, on the Eglin Range. All five aircrew members sustained various degrees of injuries when the tilt-rotor aircraft crashed, but none of the injuries were reported as life-threatening.

The disposal for wreckage used to investigate the mishap was processed by the DLA Disposition Services staff at Eglin, whose field site is located close to Hurlburt Field. Airframes usually go through a demilitarization process involving cutting it into pieces. Tim Stark, DLA Disposition Services’ lead environmental protection specialist for the area, said that due to the hazardous materials in the Osprey, utilizing DLA’s hazardous waste contract was a better way to dispose of the burned aircraft.

“CV-22 coating has been tested and was shown to contain chromated primers,” Stark said.

Besides the chromium involved, Stark said the customer’s expertise also led the cadmium code to be applied to the waste, as it is typical of many engines and components from aircraft. Six containers of wreckage were picked up by the hazardous waste disposal contractor arranged by DLA Disposition Services so that all contents could be macroencapsulated within a one-piece structural unit, typically a concrete shell. The shell is both filled and sealed with a solid material before the unit is placed in a permitted landfill. 

Stark and another contracting officer representative, Kylee Turley, were on hand to oversee the loading of the containers onto the trucks. 

“We had previously put eyes on the contents during a visit in December,” Stark said.

DLA Disposition Services manages the disposal of hazardous property for Defense Department activities. Hazardous wastes are handled through a worldwide network of HW management and disposal contracts.  Please visit the Hazardous Waste page of the DLA Disposition Services website for more information on DLA Disposition Services’ role in handling hazardous wastes and materials.
#### League of Women Voters of Westchester et al., Appellants, v County of Westchester et al., Respondents.

[630 NYS2d 768]

—In an action for a judgment declaring, *inter alia,*Local Laws, 1993, No. 12 of the County of Westchester unconstitutional, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.), entered August 9, 1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the entry of an appropriate judgment declaring that Local Laws, 1993, No. 12 of the County of Westchester is constitutional and does not violate Municipal Home Rule Law § 10 (1) (a) (13) (a).

Local Laws, 1993, No. 12 of the County of Westchester, which amended subsection (2) of section 107.31 of the Laws of Westchester County, generally provides for the reapportionment of the legislative districts of the Westchester County Legislature. The Supreme Court held that the redistricting plan does not *731violate Municipal Home Rule Law § 10 (1) (a) (13) (a) "because that section is inapplicable to the redistricting plans of Westchester County as a matter of law”. We agree. Westchester County operates under a charter form of government and its reapportionment plans are adopted pursuant to its charter, not Municipal Home Rule Law § 10 (1) (a) (13) (a). Since the County Board of Legislators of the County of Westchester did not adopt a plan of reapportionment pursuant to Municipal Home Rule Law § 10 (1) (a) (13) (a), it is not controlling here *(see, Mehiel v County Bd. of Legislators,*175 AD2d 109, 110; *see also, Suffolk County Democratic Comm. v Gaffney,*196 AD2d 799, 800; *Matter of Angell v Tompkins County Bd. of Representatives,*90 AD2d 896, 897; 1981 Opns Atty Gen 81-105, at 255).

We have considered the plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit *(see, Matter of Brooklyn Hgts. Assn. v Macchiarola,*82 NY2d 101, 106; *Matter of Schneider v Rockefeller,*31 NY2d 420; *Bay Ridge Community Council v Carey,*103 AD2d 280, *affd*66 NY2d 657). Sullivan, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.
# San Diego’s Palamara selected as DLA Security Civilian of the Year

/ Published Dec. 21, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Marcus Palamara, former security officer at Defense Logistics Agency San Diego, California, was named the Security Civilian of the Year.

Palamara worked as the anti-terrorism officer for two sites, he worked tirelessly with the Emergency Operation Center at Naval Base San Diego, Naval Air Station North Island and regional partners. On a monthly basis, he role played emergency situations with multiple tenant commands from the two bases. His actions ensured increased security readiness and standards were met for over 15,000 employees at both bases.

“Mr. Palamara brought to San Diego Distribution the technical expertise of 28 years as a Master at Arms,” stated Gregory Levardo, Palamara’s supervisor.. “He sincerely put his heart into ensuring our agency received the best product from his effort and is by far the most proactive and most intrusive security officer.”

Palamara departed DLA Distribution San Diego in September and is currently working as the physical security supervisor for Naval Weapons Station Seal Branch, California.
No. 09-11393.

#### James O’Neal-Sloane, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 877, 131 S. Ct. 190,

178 L. Ed. 2d 114,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7132.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 298.
#### Miriam Negrete, Appellant, v Emilio Hernandez et al., Respondents.

[768 NYS2d 231]

*512In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Peck, J.), dated February 14, 2003, as granted the separate motions of the defendant Emilio Hernandez and the defendants Geraldo R. Juarez and Eduarda Alves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and as denied her cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant Emilio Hernandez.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs to the plaintiff payable by the defendant Emilio Hernandez, the motions are denied, the cross motion is granted, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the defendant Emilio Hernandez.

The defendant Emilio Hernandez and the defendants Geraldo R. Juarez and Eduarda Alves separately moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them contending that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). They met their initial burden of establishing entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). However, in opposition to the motions, the plaintiff submitted the affirmation and affirmed medical report of an orthopedic surgeon who stated that he had read the plaintiff’s magnetic resonance imaging films and agreed that they revealed bulging cervical discs at multiple levels, and that “[w]ith both disc and nerve involvement, exhibits a painful functional restriction of motion by more than 15% with spasm and guarding.” The medical expert further concluded that the cervical injuries were related to the subject motor vehicle accident and should be considered permanent. The plaintiffs evidence raised a triable issue of fact as to the existence of a serious injury, *513which is for the jury to determine *(see Puma v\Player,*233 AD2d 308 [1996]).

The record contains undisputed evidence that the collision was proximately caused by the defendant Hernandez’s failure to stop his motor vehicle at a stop sign before entering the subject intersection, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1172. Therefore, the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability against that defendant should have been granted. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of ChiefFinancial Officer**

** **

I,Joseph W. Meyers, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pierre Foods, Inc.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)           all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 
|                           | /S/ JOSEPH W. MEYERS |   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| Joseph W. Meyers               |
| *Chief  Financial Officer*     |
| (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

Date:October 16, 2007

 

37

----
No. 12-6753.

#### Dodakian *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 09-11028.

#### Michael Eugene Riley, Petitioner v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

562 U.S. 859, 131 S. Ct. 133,

178 L. Ed. 2d 80,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6049.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 12.1

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
EPIQ SYSTEMS, INC.
(In Thousands, except for Ratio)

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005EarningsNet income (loss)

$
14,595

$
13,836

$
6,929

$
35,131

$
(3,842
)Income tax expense (benefit)


12,266


10,507


4,066


22,834


(2,400
)Fixed charges


4,023


3,505


13,882


15,349


7,676Earnings available for fixed charges


30,884


27,848


24,877


73,314


1,434Fixed ChargesInterest expense*


1,160


1,331


10,980


12,023


5,662Amortization of deferred loan charges


314


426


993


1,445


1,147Estimated interest expense in leases


2,549


1,748


1,909


1,881


867Total fixed charges

$
4,023

$
3,505

$
13,882

$
15,349

$
7,676Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


7.7


7.9


1.8


4.8


0.2


*Interest
included in fixed charges includes only interest on third party indebtedness and, accordingly, we have excluded accrued interest expense related to
uncertain tax positions.


For
the year ended December 31, 2005, our earnings to fixed charges ratio was less than one to one coverage. The amount of such deficiency was $6,242.

---



QuickLinks