alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Distribution 2021 Earth Week message

/ Published April 22, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Installation Management Susquehanna Environmental Management Division has put together an environmental sustainability awareness campaign consisting of several emails to be shared throughout the week to celebrate Earth Day’s 51st anniversary on April 22, 2021. We did not plan for any gatherings this week due to the ongoing pandemic, however there are many virtual / social distance type events available this week for personal / family participation. Remember to treat every day as Earth Day; everyone plays a role and we all can make a difference.

**Tips for around work:**
      - All dock doors should remain closed during the heating season unless actively in use (the heating season is typically October 15th- April 15th).
      - Dock doors for humidity controlled facilities should remain closed year round.
      - Be sure and use the proper recycle bins provided in each break area.
      - Problems with space temperature should be reported to the service order desk (68-72F for heating and 72-76F for cooling in office areas, 55-65F for heating in warehouse or repair facilities).
      - Water leaks or running toilets should be reported to the service order desk.
      - Only storm water should go into storm water drains.
      - Use LED or Fluorescent lighting and ensure lights are off when spaces are unoccupied.

**Tips for around the home:**
      - Clean equipment filters reduce operating costs for furnaces and air conditioning units.
      - Have a heating or air conditioning system tune up prior to the beginning of each season for peak efficiency.
      - Set space temperatures back during periods when your home is unoccupied or while you sleep (5F higher during the cooling season and 5F lower during the heating season).
      - Identify any water leaks and repair.
      - Where available, recycle per your local township guidelines. Most townships offer locations for recycling if it is not included with your trash service.
      - Use LED or Fluorescent lighting and ensure lights are off when spaces are unoccupied.

Conserve Today! Our Installation Energy Manager, works to reduce environmental impact from energy and water conservation efforts throughout the year. Please keep the attached conservation saving measures in mind as we strive for mission success.
No. 09-1142.

#### FIA Card Services, N.A., Petitioner v. John C. Gorman.

562 U.S. 828, 131 S. Ct. 71,

178 L. Ed. 2d 23,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6551.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

*24Same case below, 584 F.3d 1147.
#### Fishoff Family Foundation et al., Plaintiffs, and Mark Appel, Respondent, v Jacob Frydman et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[50 NYS3d 346]

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered October 22, 2015, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants’ motion for sanctions, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Insofar as relevant here, to be liable for sanctions, a party or attorney must knowingly submit or sign pleadings or papers containing materially false statements of fact (Rules of Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 130-1 *et seq.).*Whether to impose sanctions, even in such a case, is left to the discretion of the court *(see e.g. Weisburst v Dreifus,*89 AD3d 536 [1st Dept 2011]). Here, plaintiffs stated that they relied on prior counsel for the allegations raised in the complaint after counsel’s investigation. Given that many of the facts in the complaint were a matter of public record, and that defendants never deposed prior counsel or otherwise established that he lacked a good faith basis for the allegations, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                             TILDEN ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


All of the Company's subsidiaries are wholly-owned.

Tilden Associates, Inc. Subsidiaries                         Incorporated In

B.K. 163rd St., Inc. .........................................   Florida
B.K. 8 Street, Inc. ..........................................   Florida
B.K. Oakland, Inc. ...........................................   Florida
B.K. Pines, Inc. .............................................   Florida
B.K. University, Inc. ........................................   Florida
B.W.B., Inc. .................................................   Florida
B.W.S., Inc. B.W.B., Inc. ....................................   Florida
B.W.O.A., Inc. B.W.B., Inc. ..................................   Florida
B.W. of Palm Beach, Inc. B.W.B., Inc. ........................   Florida
TBW Dixie, Inc. ..............................................   Florida
Tilden 126-14 Merrick Blvd., Inc. ............................   New York
Tilden ABS, Inc. .............................................   New York
Tilden Brakeshop, Inc. .......................................   New York
Tilden Brakeworld, Inc. ......................................   New York
Tilden Broward, Inc. .........................................   Florida
Tilden Dutch Realty, Inc. ....................................   New York
Tilden Equipment Corp. .......................................   New York
Tilden Florida Realty, Inc. ..................................   Florida
Tilden Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. ..................................   Florida
Tilden Hempstead, Inc. .......................................   New York
Tilden Massapequa, Inc. ......................................   New York
Tilden NH Realty, Inc. ....................................... New Hampshire
Tilden Port Chester, Inc. ....................................   New York
Tilden Realty Corp. ..........................................   New York
Tilden Realty FLA, Inc. ......................................   Florida
Tilden Realty Georgia, Inc. ..................................   Georgia
Tilden Realty TX, Inc. .......................................    Texas
Tilden Smithtown, Inc. .......................................   New York
No. 09-10870.

#### Ernest Miller, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 854, 131 S. Ct. 115,

178 L. Ed. 2d 71,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6108.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
159 A.3d 885

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROHAN GRANVILLE, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 1, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
.. ;.. -

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

The State ofConnecticut and

Middletown Power LLC

)

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement and Order 8182A

Modification No.3

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Middletown Power

LLC (Respondent) having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and

Order 8182A and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual agreement, further modify

said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

I. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-174-22(d)(l) through 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies (Regulations) are hereby

replaced with May 1,2010.

2. Any references to October Ist with respect to the date by which the Respondents shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits (DERCS) and/or allowances

for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009.

3. Any references to May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs, shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31,

2010.

4. All references to September I, 2008 with respect to the submission of Future

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009.

5. No later than May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order 8182A and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent shall

comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-174-22(d)(I) and 22a-174-22(d)(2)(A) of

the Regulations.

6. All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order 8182A, as modified,

shall remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street • Hartford. CT On 106 - 5127

http://www.cI.gov/dcp

All Equal Opporllllliry Employer
...... - .

•

Middletown Power LLC 2 Trading Agreement and Order 8182A

Modification No.3

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

Middletown Power LLC

Date

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order.

Ga 0

Director

Engineering and Enforcement Division

Bureau of Air Management

Title: '? \ a..,,-\- t1"'-V' c.. j '-\r

Date: 'i-I~-o"

Signature: &",,:1f......ili,""""'u:t2.L='-=~---­

Name: -\:)cw:,J ~. S'xS f?<.h..tc..l-!
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Vermont Natural Gas % of Total Vehicle Fuel Deliveries   (Percent)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Vermont Natural Gas % of Total Vehicle Fuel Deliveries   (Percent)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0.01  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.01   | 0.01   | --     | 0.01   | 0.01   | 0.00   | 0.00   | 0.00   | 0.00   | 0.00  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.00   | 0.01   | 0.01   | 0.01   | 0.01   | 0.01   | 0.01   | --     | --     | 0.04  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.04   | 0.06   | 0.05   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Com. v. Foley11

03/29/2016

444 WAL (2015)

11

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 97
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chi Yuan Hwang, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 323]

*246Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Stack-house, J.), rendered November 7, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of five years probation, with a $1,000 fine on each count and restitution to be determined separately, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in its *Molineux (People v Molineux,*168 NY 264 [1901]) rulings. All of the evidence at issue was relevant to defendant’s motive and intent, as well as tending to dispel the notion that there was an innocent explanation for his conduct, and the potential for prejudice did not outweigh the probative value of this evidence *(see e.g. People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233 [1987]; *People v Marrin,*205 NY 275 [1912]; *People v Torres,*237 AD2d 650 [1997]). Moreover, any prejudice was minimized by the court’s appropriate limiting instructions.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The elements of falsity and fraudulent intent could be readily inferred from the evidence.

Even assuming arguendo that the court should have instructed the jury that certain witnesses were accomplices as a matter of law, rather than submitting the issue of accomplice status to the jury as a question of fact, there was ample corroborating evidence tending to connect defendant to the crime *(see People v Besser,*96 NY2d 136 [2001]; *People v McAndris,*300 AD2d 1 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 630 [2003]), and any error in this regard would be harmless *(see People v Adams,*185 AD2d 680 [1992], *lv denied*80 NY2d 926 [1992]).

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Sullivan, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                                  5

<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                       1,862,000
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               27,476,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 1,856,000
<INVENTORY>                                                 27,922,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            59,322,000
<PP&E>                                                      79,970,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (33,588,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             127,618,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       30,453,000
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                (22,851,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               127,618,000
<SALES>                                                    151,087,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           151,087,000
<CGS>                                                      106,431,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              106,431,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            34,517,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          12,354,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (2,510,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   880,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (3,390,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (3,390,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (7.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (7.03)




</TABLE>
164 A.3d 399

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT E. COLES, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 16, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
No. 09-10807.

#### Cecil Howard, aka Alonzo Whitehead, Petitioner v. Washington State Prison, et al.

562 U.S. 852, 131 S. Ct. 111,

178 L. Ed. 2d 68,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6142,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2



AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF THE DESIGNATION, PREFERENCES RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS
OF SERIES B, 5 PERCENT, CUMULATIVE, CONVERTIBLE, NON-VOTING, PREFERRED STOCK OF
MICRO-MEDIA SOLUTIONS, INC.

     Micro-Media Solutions, Inc., hereinafter called the "Corporation," a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Utah,

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     That, pursuant to authority conferred upon the Board of Directors by the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, and pursuant to Section
16-10a-602 of the Utah Business Corporation Act, such Board of Directors by the
unanimous written consent of its members dated effective September 21, 1998
adopted a resolution providing for an amendment to that certain Certificate of
Designation filed by the Corporation with the Secretary of the State of Utah on
November 12, 1997, to increase the designation of Series B 5 Percent Cumulative
Convertible Non-Voting, Preferred Stock, $5.30 stated value per share, from
420,000 shares to 490,000 shares, which resolution is as follows:

     RESOLVED, that pursuant to the authority conferred upon the Board of
Directors by the Certificate of Incorporation, the Series B 5 Percent Cumulative
Convertible Non-Voting Preferred Stock, $5.30 stated value per share, ("Series B
Preferred Stock"), that was created on November 12, 1997, by that certain
Certificate of the Designation, Preferences, Rights, and Limitations of Series B
5 Percent Cumulative Convertible Non-Voting Preferred Stock of the Corporation
is hereby amended to increase the number of shares created from Four Hundred
Twenty Thousand (420,000) shares of Series B Preferred Stock to Four Hundred
Twenty Thousand (490,000) shares of Series B Preferred Stock. The voting powers,
preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special rights, and
the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof shall remain the same.

1. This resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation
and it was also duly adopted by all of the holders of outstanding shares of
Series B Preferred Stock.

2. The foregoing resolution does not provide for an exchange, reclassification,
or cancellation of issued shares of the Corporation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Micro-Media Solutions, Inc. has caused this certificate
to be signed by Jose Chavez, its President, and attested by Mitchell C.
Kettrick, its Secretary, this 13th day of October, 1998.

MICRO-MEDIA SOLUTIONS, INC. By /s/ JOSE CHAVEZ, President

ATTEST: By: /s/ MITCHELL C. KETTRICK, Secretary
# New video showcases deployable DLA Distribution teams

/ Published Aug. 20, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
A new Defense Logistics Agency video showcases DLA Distribution’s deployable teams, called DDXX. The teams are prepared to set up mobile warehouses anywhere in the world on short notice to put material ranging from repair parts to construction equipment as close to warfighters as possible and reduce customer wait time. The result: increased readiness.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis White, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 275]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Miriam Best, J.), rendered January 21, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Richter, Feinman, Webber and Kahn, JJ.
No. 09-11527.

#### Ardeana Ellis, Petitioner v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline.

562 U.S. 823, 131 S. Ct. 384,

178 L. Ed. 2d 19,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6313.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 25, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 363 Fed. Appx. 481.
#### Com. v. Rudd.

06/29/2016

69 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 601
No. 12-7088.

#### Anaya, aka Anaya-Granillo *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.