alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Loucopoulos, Plaintiff, v 482 Mill Road Associates, Inc., Respondent, Fred Werner, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[767 NYS2d 793]

— In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Fred Werner appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), entered August 7, 2002, as, after a nonjury trial, determined that Francis D. Pope, Francis D. Pope, Jr., and Daniel S. Pope assumed ownership and control of the defendant 482 Mill Road Associates, Inc., in November 1999.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The determination of a court after a nonjury trial should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is clear that its conclusion could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Ouziel v Baram,*305 AD2d 564 [2003]). The evidence adduced at trial supported the Supreme Court’s determination that Francis D. Pope, Francis D. Pope, Jr., and Daniel S. Pope assumed ownership and control of the defendant 482 Mill Road Associates, Inc., in November 1999.

Since the defendant 482 Mill Road Associates, Inc., withdrew its appeal from the judgment, its contention that the Supreme *412Court improperly excluded certain evidence at the trial is not properly before this Court *(see Lisanti v Belling,*269 AD2d 501 [2000]). McGinity, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.
No. 09-11409.

#### Larry Stanley Traugott, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 878, 131 S. Ct. 193,

178 L. Ed. 2d 116,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6775.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 925.
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/25 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
# DLA Energy rocket propellant fuels NASA rover to Red Planet

/ Published Feb. 23, 2021

Fueled by Defense Logistics Agency Energy-supplied liquid oxygen and rocket propellant, NASA’s rover Perseverance safely touched down on Mars on Feb. 18 after a seven-month, 292-million-mile journey.

Using thrusters fired with DLA Energy hydrazine, the $2.7 billion rover landed in an ancient lake bed called Jezero Crater. The Perseverance is on a two-year mission to find evidence of past life on Mars.

“DLA Energy hydrazine has always been used by NASA for its missions to Mars,” said DLA Energy Aerospace Energy Director of Customer Operations Steve Nichols. “The hydrazine propelled the spacecraft in its cruise stage from Earth to Mars and small thrusters were used to adjust the vehicle’s course. Most of the hydrazine is used to fire bigger thrusters to control entry, descent, and landing on the Martian surface.”  

Landing the one-ton, SUV-size Perseverance was ground breaking. According to NASA, only about 40% of the missions ever sent to Mars – by any space agency – have been successful. 

Traveling nearly 12,500 miles per hour during its seven-minute descent through the Martian atmosphere, pre-programed commands from its onboard computer guided the aircraft safely to its rugged landing zone.

“Perseverance is different because of new entry, descent and landing technologies, such as Terrain-Relative Navigation,” Nichols said. “This sophisticated navigation system allows the rover to detect and avoid hazardous terrain by diverting around it during its descent through the Martian atmosphere using thrusters fired with DLA Energy hydrazine.”

According to NASA, the Mars 2020 Perseverance rover is the agency’s ninth mission to land on the Red Planet.

“NASA continues to broaden its knowledge of the universe, and DLA Energy helps it do that,” said DLA Energy Aerospace Energy Director of Supplier Operations Doug Smith. “We supported the spacecraft that flew past Pluto (New Horizons), the Parker Solar Probe that got the closest to the sun and have actually supported landing on Mars not so long ago with the Insight spacecraft as well as studying the origin of the universe with OSIRIS-REx.”  

In July, the Perseverance left earth on a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket filled with 26,000 gallons of RP-1 along with 300 pounds of high purity hydrazine for the upper stage booster and 1,000 pounds of high purity hydrazine for the spacecraft, Nichols said.  

As the Department of Defense Integrated Materiel Manager for space and space-related products since 2001, DLA Energy provides 28 different product sources for a variety of Department of Defense, federal, commercial and research missions.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 

Dallas Texas 75202 - 2733

December 23, 2010 

Open Letter to Permit Holders and Interested Members of the Public: 

I am writing to notify you of the actions the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) is taking to ensure that as of January 2, 2011, businesses in Texas will be able to obtain, in 

a timely way, federal air construction and operating permits meeting the Clean Air Act’s 

requirements for greenhouse gases. Companies who have a PSD permit pending now at the 

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), expect to be filing one in the near future, 

or might be major sources of greenhouse gases should contact EPA to discuss their potential 

obligation to obtain a PSD permit for GHG emissions. GHG permitting in Texas will be handled 

directly by EPA beginning on January 2, 2011. 

As you know, the Clean Air Act allows states to implement certain elements of the 

federal Clean Air Act, one of which is the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 

permitting program for major sources of federally regulated air pollutants. TCEQ has 

implemented an EPA-approved PSD program since 1992. As a direct result of the Supreme 

Court’s Massachusetts vs EPA decision, beginning on January 2, 2011, greenhouse gases will 

become newly regulated air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. On December 10, 2010, the D.C. 

Circuit Court confirmed that EPA's greenhouse gas regulations shall remain in effect and 

enforceable pending completion of any future judicial reviews. Therefore, it is incumbent on 

EPA to take action now to ensure that permitting authorities have the ability to issue, and 

covered sources the ability to obtain, the necessary greenhouse gas permits beginning on that 

date. Specifically, the Act requires that sources emitting greenhouse gases over certain quantities 

must obtain a PSD preconstruction permit for their emissions of those pollutants. EPA has been 

in communication with state and local air permitting agencies, including the TCEQ, over the past 

year to ensure that they will be in a position to issue PSD permits for greenhouse gasses or, if 

not, a federal plan is in place so as to avoid delays for businesses wishing to build new or expand 

existing sources. 

Earlier this month, EPA issued a final rule with a determination that the permitting 

programs for 13 states, including Texas, are not adequate because they do not apply PSD to 

greenhouse gas emissions, 75 Fed. Reg. 77698 (Dec. 13, 2010). In that final rule, EPA also 

included a “SIP call” requiring these state agencies to revise their PSD state implementation 

plans (SIPs) to include greenhouse gases. However, state officials in Texas have made clear, in 

letters to EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, statements in the media, and in legal challenges to 

EPA’s greenhouse gas rules, (including the recent challenge to the SIP Call rule) that they have
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Ex Parte: Nijinski Tywon Murphy

No. 06

- 13

- 00198

- CR Original Habeas Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice

Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the petition for writ of habeas

corpus should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the petition.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 11, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, II I

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14753]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-AGL-61]


Modification of Class D Airspace; Minot AFB, ND; and Class E 
Airspace; Minot, ND; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects one error in the legal description of a 
final rule that was published in the Federal Register on March 23, 1998 
(63 FR 13778), Airspace Docket No. 97-AGL-61. The final rule modified 
Class D Airspace at Minot AFB, ND, and modified Class E Airspace at 
Minot, ND.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 9091 UTC, June 18, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle M. Behm, Air Traffic 
Division, Airspace Branch, AGL-520, Federal Aviation Administration, 
2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018, telephone: (847) 294-
7477.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    Federal Register Document 98-7405, Airspace Docket No. 97-AGL-61, 
published on March 23, 1998 (63 FR 13778) rule modified Class D 
Airspace at Minot AFB, ND, and modified Class E Airspace at Minot, ND. 
One error was discovered in the legal description for the Class E 
airspace for Minot, ND. This action corrects that error.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the legal 
description for the Class E airspace Minot, ND, as published in the 
Federal Register March 23, 1998 (63 FR 13778), (FR Doc. 98-7405), is 
corrected as follows:

PART 71--[CORRECTED]


Sec. 71.7  [Corrected]

AGL ND E5  Minot, ND  [Corrected]

    On page 13779, in the Class E airspace designation for Minot, 
ND, incorporated by reference in Sec. 71.1, in column 2, line 11 
from top of column, the phrase ``Deering TACAN 292 deg. radial'' to 
read ``Deering TACAN 312 degree radial''.

    Issued in Des Plaines, IL on May 20, 1998.
Maureen Woods,
Manager, Air Traffic Division, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 98-14753 Filed 6-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# DLA Troop Support celebrates newest civilian retiree

/ Published Aug. 31, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support said goodbye to a long-time civilian employee during a retirement ceremony August 27 in Philadelphia.

Lisa Vicoli from Information Operations (J6) retired after 42 years of federal service.

DLA Troop Support Deputy Commander Richard Ellis presided over the ceremony and wished Vicoli well in her retirement. 

“It is a privilege to have this opportunity to celebrate a civilian who has given so much of herself in support of our warfighters serving around the world,” Ellis said.

Ellis acknowledged Vicoli’s family members in attendance, including her daughter Leigh Ann, who works in the Construction and Equipment supply chain; her sister Genevieve, who retired from Industrial Hardware in 2015; and her brother-in-law Richard, who retired from Subsistence in 2011.

“I guess we can really refer to Troop Support as a family business,” he said.

Ellis presented Vicoli with a certificate of retirement, DLA Troop Support mementos and a commander’s coin. A certificate of appreciation was presented to her husband, Leonard.

Vicoli started working for the Internal Revenue Service shortly after graduating from high school. Leaving to attend college full-time, she returned to work at the former Defense Industrial Supply Center, which evolved into DLA Troop Support. She retired as an IT specialist in DLA Information Operations. Her career highlights include being a pioneer for the telework program, serving as one of its first participants in 2003. She also was involved in teaching software programs throughout the years and moving applications over to the cloud.

“I’ve worked with and for many, many outstanding business associates and friends over the years,” Vicoli said. “I always found DLA to be a very great organization to work for, [they] supported me with work and family balance.”
No. 09-11269.

#### Antoine L. Wilson, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 871, 131 S. Ct. 170,

178 L. Ed. 2d 101,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6572.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15533]



[[Page 31973]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-239-000]


Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Tariff Filing

June 5, 1998.
    Take notice that on June 1, 1998, Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C. 
(Destin) tendered for filing certain modifications to its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, to become effective on July 1, 1998.
    Destin states that the purpose of the filing is to incorporate 
modifications and clarifications resulting from negotiations with 
shippers seeking transportation services on the Destin Pipeline, as 
more particularly described in Destin's June 1, 1998 filing and 
Appendix B thereto. Destin requests that its proposed Tariff changes be 
made effective July 1, 1998, which is Destin's projected in-service 
date for the part of its pipeline system extending from the Main Pass 
260 Platform to Destin's interconnection with Florida Gas Transmission 
Corp.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15533 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO****SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**
I, Howard G. Phanstiel, certify that:
1.     I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of PacifiCare HealthSystems, Inc.;
2.     Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
3.     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;
4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
          a)     designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;
          b)     evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based on such evaluation; and
          c)     disclosed in thisannual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal year that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a)     all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial datainformation; and
          b)     any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 4, 2004 By: /s/ HOWARD G. PHANSTIEL      Howard G. Phanstiel     *Chairman of the Board* *and Chief Executive Officer* (Principal Executive Officer)
# DLA to launch second supplier survey

/ Published Nov. 6, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency will release a survey Nov. 12 to collect supplier feedback and drive internal change. The agency sent out the first Supplier Survey in September 2018 asking representatives from more than 7,000 companies to evaluate their experience conducting business with DLA.

In this year’s survey introduction, DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic said supplier feedback will help the agency refine processes, improve responsiveness and strengthen relationships.

“This year, the DLA Supplier Survey is especially significant because of the COVID-19 pandemic,” the admiral wrote. “There has never been a more important time for DLA to understand the needs and challenges of our industry partners than right now.”

DLA Ombudsman Tim Stark said suppliers will have until late January 2021 to complete the survey.

“We target suppliers who have done $50,000 or more in business with DLA over the previous two years,” he said. “Within the survey is demographic information about the companies: whether they’re small or large, manufacturers or distributors, and what particular supply chain within DLA they do business with.”

Stark said the agency uses the data to develop action plans based on specific focus areas identified by suppliers.

“It's important for us to understand our areas of strengths and potential weaknesses, and how our supplier base views us as a partner; whether we communicate in a timely fashion, if we are effective throughout the acquisition process and if we demonstrate sufficient knowledge of their company and industry,” he said.

The survey is part of the agency’s industry engagement effort outlined in the 2018 DLA Industry Engagement Plan and supports the strong partnerships tenet in DLA’s Strategic Plan. Stark said the 2018 survey resulted in over 3,000 responses and DLA Acquisition leaders are hoping for a greater response this year.

“We’re highly encouraging all who receive a survey to respond and let us know how we’re doing,” Stark said.

Industry representatives can get more information about the survey by contacting the DLA Industry Engagement Office at IndustryEngagement@dla.mil.
#### Louis Blangiardo, Plaintiff, v Debbie Blangiardo, Appellant. L. David Toupin, Nonparty Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 788]-

*382In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Sgroi, J.), dated March 21, 2001, as granted the motion of the Law Guardian to direct her to pay her share of his legal fee in the sum of $4,257.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there was no evidence that the Law Guardian was prejudiced against her *(see Carballeira v Shumway,*273 AD2d 753 [2000]). The Law Guardian acted properly by advocating a position that he believed to be in the children’s best interests, and is entitled to fair and reasonable compensation for the period he was appointed to represent the children *(see Haynes v Haynes,*83 NY2d 954 [1994]; *Carballeira v Shumway, supra).*

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., McGinity, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.
No. 12-7164.

#### Flores *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# Annual tornado drill held on Defense Supply Center Richmond

/ Published March 14, 2022
RICHMOND, Va., 
Every year, Virginia’s tornado season peaks during the spring and summer seasons. It’s a time when the commonwealth is susceptible to severe thunderstorms which can produce short-lived, but very destructive tornados.

As part of Virginia Severe Weather Awareness Week 2022, which took place March 7-11, annual tornado response drills take place throughout the commonwealth. Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, tested the mass warning notification system, Giant Voice, with a "seek shelter" message March 8.

William Bullock Sr., the installation emergency manager for DLA Installation Management Richmond said "seek shelter" means to immediately look for or seek a protected place to stay until the emergency has subsided and is used for weather-type events.

He said it’s essential to understand that "seek shelter" is synonymous with tornado season.

During a tornado, flying debris is one of the greatest dangers, and it is best to avoid any room with windows that debris could potentially break. The best location to "seek shelter" is an enclosed, windowless area in the center of a building or the sturdiest part of a building. Interior stairwells are alternate places to shelter.