alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MONARCH
CEMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,261,389
<SECURITIES>                                13,699,700
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,424,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                   407,000
<INVENTORY>                                 16,970,188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,399,705
<PP&E>                                     116,179,408
<DEPRECIATION>                              82,982,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,202,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,908,996
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,334,860
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,940,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,202,926
<SALES>                                     82,391,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            82,391,106
<CGS>                                       66,196,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               66,196,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,095,430
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,075,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,020,430
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,020,430
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.69


</TABLE>
2017-1353.

#### State v. Artis.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-160707, C-160727, C-160728, C-160729, and C-160730. Reported at_Ohio St.3d_, 2017-Ohio-8297,_N.E.3d_On appellant’s motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. Appellant’s motion for stay, motion to correct caption, and “motion to not dismiss” denied as moot.

O’Neill and Fischek, JJ., not participating.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-20451

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GODFREY OKE OBIOZOR, a/k/a

Godfrey Oke Obizar,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CV-5670

_________________________________________________________________

December 11, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Godfrey Oke Obiozor appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Obiozor argues that the

government breached the plea agreement; that counsel was

ineffective for failing to object to the PSR, failing to move to

withdraw Obiozor’s plea on the basis of the alleged breach of the
-2-

agreement and failing to appeal the issues of the breached plea

agreement, the denial of acceptance of responsibility, and

Obiozor’s sentence as a supervisor or manager; and that his

sentence is erroneous under the Sentencing Guidelines. He also

argues that the district court erred by dismissing his petition

without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. An evidentiary hearing was not necessary

to resolve Obiozor’s claims. United States v. Bartholomew, 974

F.2d 39, 41 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we AFFIRM for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Obiozor, No. CR-H-91-193 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 5, 1996).

This court has not yet determined whether a certificate of

appealability (“COA”) is required under the circumstances of this

appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. To the extent that a COA is

required, we construe Obiozor’s notice of appeal as an application

for a COA and DENY the motion.

A F F I R M E D.
#### Henney v. Com. Dept. of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing 107

12/29/2015

764 MAL (2015)

107

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied

No. 1217 CD 2015
# Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services starts planning for annual Continuity of Operation Training Exercise

/ Published Aug. 6, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich. , 
Key Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services employees met to discuss the annual Continuity of Operations Training Exercise scheduled for later. 

                Charles Combs met with DLA Disposition Services key employees at HDIFC to discuss the annual Continuity of Operations Exercise.                            COOP Planning                            Charles Combs met with DLA Disposition Services key employees at HDIFC to discuss the annual Continuity of Operations Exercise.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA Disposition ServicesVIRIN: 210714-D-OD896-201During a disaster, federal agencies rely upon continuity planning to preserve the mission essential capabilities of their organizational structure. This enables DLA Disposition Services leadership the ability to communicate with customers, employees and other organizations during the most extreme circumstances.

This year’s COOPEX will focus on the ability to devolve DLA Disposition Services leadership responsibilities to the designated Devolution Emergency Relocation Group – a group that will assume command and test their coordination with the remaining Disposition Services senior leaders to continue to perform the Disposition Services’ mission – through a mock disaster scenario.

Over the past 18 months, the DLA Disposition Services COOPEX plan has been under a complete overhaul since the newly appointed COOP Program Manager Charles Combs assumed responsibilities.

In a recent planning session, Combs sat down with a group of process managers from across the headquarters’ directorates to map out which tasks are mission essential that need to be preserved in a contingency.

“This has been a crawl, walk, run, “ Combs said. “I’m not the expert, you all are the experts and I need you to help lead me into the development of a scenario so that we can give the devolution site all the tools they need to play the role of leadership.”

Initially the exercise was planned as a small, minimally impactful operation. Since the initial planning phase, it has grown in scale to be a more robust and capable action that will more accurately reflect a real-world scenario.

More information and reporting will follow as DLA Disposition Services continues to develop its contingency planning capability.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Douglas John Manifold, Jr., Appellant

No. 06-17-00103-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 196th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 31,102). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Douglas John Manifold, Jr., has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 9, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
No. 09-10718.

#### Craig Emmett Mendenhall, Petitioner v. Texas.

562 U.S. 850, 131 S. Ct. 101,

178 L. Ed. 2d 64,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5925.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                          18 U.S.C. Section 1350
          Certification of the President and Chairman of the Board

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Company.


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The
Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

Dated:  August 14, 2003.


                                           /s/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                          Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                          President and
                                          Chairman of the Board
# DLA Energy deputy commander named new DLA chief of staff

/ Published April 29, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
W. Eric Smith has been selected as the Defense Logistics Agency’s new chief of staff, DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic announced in an April 27 email to senior leaders. 

Smith is currently deputy commander of DLA Energy and oversees planning, direction and execution of worldwide support in petroleum, natural gas, electricity, coal and aerospace energy to military and government agencies as well as foreign governments. 

His previous positions include deputy director for minority programs and business operations in the Department of Energy’s Office of Economic Impact and Diversity, as well as acting associate administrator for emergency operations and deputy associate administrator for emergency management and preparedness at the National Nuclear Security Administration. 

During his seven years at the Department of Homeland Security, Smith implemented a national and interagency all-hazards operations support concept. He also instituted a public and private sector resource planning and operations support capability to respond to catastrophic disasters, national emergencies and special events. 

A former Army logistics management officer, Smith served as executive officer to former DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Robert Dail and staff director for DLA’s Logistics Operations Center in 2006. He became a member of the senior executive service in 2007, when he was selected to join the Federal Emergency Management Agency as the assistant administrator for logistics management leading the transformation of domestic disaster logistics following Hurricane Katrina. 

Smith has master’s degrees in national security strategy from the National War College and in business administration from Saint Ambrose University in addition to a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of Tennessee. 

He is replacing Kristin French, who is now deputy director of DLA Logistics Operations. Skubic said Smith will transition to his new role in the next few weeks.
#### Jose Cerrato et al., Appellants, v Dee Corporation et al., Defendants, and Sharon Hakmon et al., Respondents.

[56 NYS3d 30]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered on or about December 28, 2015, which granted the individual defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the action as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This action alleges negligence in, inter alia, the architectural design and construction of plaintiffs’ new 3-family home. The *523individual defendants established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by submitting documentary evidence, deposition testimony, and affidavits that demonstrated that they acted in a representative capacity as agents of corporate entities that served legitimate business purposes, and that stated that defendants did not contract with plaintiffs purchasers in their personal capacities *(see generally Sound Communications, Inc. v Rack & Roll, Inc.,*88 AD3d 523 [1st Dept 2011]; *Brito v DILP Corp.,*282 AD2d 320 [1st Dept 2001]).

The burden shifted to plaintiffs, who did not demonstrate that defendants dominated the corporate entities they represented by, inter aha, ignoring corporate formalities and engaging in self-dealing in order to perpetuate a fraud or wrong against plaintiffs *(see TIAA Global Invs., LLC v One Astoria Sq. LLC,*127 AD3d 75, 90 [1st Dept 2015]; *Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v Atlantic Yards B2 Owner, LLC,*146 AD3d 1, 12-13 [1st Dept 2016]). The record lacks evidence to suggest that either individual defendant dominated the corporation he represented, thus undermining plaintiffs request to pierce the corporate veil *(see Baby Phat Holding Co., LLC v Kellwood Co.,*123 AD3d 405, 407 [1st Dept 2014]).

Further, insofar as a contractual relationship between the nonparty architectural corporation and plaintiffs was lacking, we find unavailing plaintiffs’ contention that they submitted facts to raise a triable issue that they had a near privity relationship with the individual defendant architect who allegedly self-certified the construction work to the local building department in order to secure a temporary certificate of occupancy. Plaintiffs did not offer evidence as would raise a triable issue that the architect knew or could have known that plaintiffs were involved with the property and were relying upon his alleged certified statements that pertained to the building construction *(see Sykes v RFD Third Ave. 1 Assoc., LLC,*67 AD3d 162, 165-166 [1st Dept 2009], *affd*15 NY3d 370 [2010]; *North Star Contr. Corp. v MTA Capital Constr. Co.,*120 AD3d 1066, 1069-1071 [1st Dept 2014]).

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT NO VE MB ER 3 , 2005 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [D O N OT P UBL ISH] IN TH E U NITE D S TAT ES C OUR T OF AP PE ALS F OR TH E E LE V EN TH C IR C U IT

N o. 05- 1452 4 N on -A rg um en t C ale nd ar

D. C. Docket N o. 04-00494 -CV -FT M-33SPC MIC HAEL F. FAGA

N, Pl ai nt iff s- App el la nt , ve rs us CITY OF MARC O ISLAND, A. W ILLIAM MOSS , in di vi du al ly, ROGER REINKE, in di vi du al ly, Defen da nt s- App el le es .

Ap peal from the Un ited S tates D istrict C ourt fo r th e M id dl e D ist ri ct of F lor id a (N ove m be r 3, 200 5) Be fo re TJ OF LA T, C A RN ES an d P R Y OR , C ir cu it Ju dg es .2

PE R CU RIA M: In this case, the district court, dism issin g appellant’s c laim s, held that ap pe llant’ s a lle ga tio ns f

ai le d to sta te ac la im

und er the F ir st and F ourte en th Am endm ents allegations for the infringem ent of appellant’ s rights of free speec h

an d f re ed om of a sso ci at ion

. A ppe llant n ow appe al s th e co urt’ s r uli ngs. F or

the reasons stated in the dis trict court’ s disp ositiv e order of July 15, 2005, we agree that appellant’s a llegations fail to state a c laim for the infringem ent of either ri ght s—f re e spe ec h or

f re ed om of a sso ci at ion

. AFFIRMED.
No. 12-6508.

#### Hughes *v.*Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2212

To provide guidelines for the membership of committees making recommendations on the rules of procedure appointed by the Judicial Conference,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 20 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. HEFLIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide guidelines for the membership of committees making recommendations on the rules of procedure appointed

by the Judicial Conference, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MEMBERSHIP OF COMMITTEES MAKING REC4 OMMENDATIONS ON RULES OF PROCEDURE.

5 Section 2073(a)(2) of title 28, United States Code,

6 is amended by striking out the second sentence and insert7 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘Each such committee shall have a ma8 jority of members of the practicing bar, and also shall have
2

•S 2212 IS

1 members of the bench (including trial and apellate judges)

2 and academics.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.5


                              POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned hereby appoints Robert T. Slezak as his agent and
attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form
10-K relating to the year ending September 25, 1998, and any amendments
thereto, required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
Ameritrade Holding Corporation.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the 24th day of November, 1998.





/s/ John W. Ward
----------------
John W. Ward, Director
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1519 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1519

         To suspend temporarily the duty on lambdacyhalothrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 5 (legislative day, September 27), 1993

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on lambdacyhalothrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAMBDACYHALOTHRIN.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

      

        ``   9902.31.12  [1a(S*),3a(Z)]-  Free             No change        No change        On or before 12/
                          (<plus-minus>)-                                                     31/96           ''
                          cyano-(3-                                                                            .
                          phenoxyphenyl)-
                          methyl 3-(2-
                          chloro-3,3,3-
                          trifluoro-1-
                          propenyl)-2,2-
                          dimethylcy-
                          clopropanecar-
                          boxylate (CAS
                          No. 91465-08-
                          6) (provided
                          for in
                          subheading
                          2926.90.27)...

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
|                             | State or Other  |   |       |   |
|----------------------------------|-----------------|--------|------------|--------|
|                             | Jurisdiction of |   | Percentage |   |
|                             | Incorporation   |   | Ownership  |   |
| Parent                           |            |   |       |   |
|                             |            |   |       |   |
| First South Bancorp, Inc.        | Virginia        |   |       |   |
|                             |            |   |       |   |
| Subsidiary                       |            |   |       |   |
|                             |            |   |       |   |
| First South Bank                 | North Carolina  |   |       | 100    | % |
|                             |            |   |       |   |   |
| First South Preferred Trust I    | Delaware        |   |       | 100    | % |
|                             |            |   |       |   |   |
| Subsidiaries of First South Bank |            |   |       |   |   |
|                             |            |   |       |   |   |
| First South Investments, Inc.    | North Carolina  |   |       | 100    | % |
|                             |            |   |       |   |   |
| First South Leasing, LLC         | North Carolina  |   |       | 100    | % |

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13742]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3082]


State of Kentucky; Amendment #1

    In accordance with notices from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency dated May 10 and 11, 1998, the above-numbered Declaration is 
hereby amended to include Leslie County in the State of Kentucky as a 
disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms, tornadoes, and 
flooding, and to establish the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning on April 16, 1998 and continuing through May 10, 1998.
    All counties contiguous to the above-name primary county have been 
previously declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is June 28, 1998 and for 
economic injury the termination date is January 29, 1999.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: May 13, 1998.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-13742 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32037-32038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15559]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Docket 37554]


Notice of Order Adjusting the Standard Foreign Fare Level Index

    Section 41509(e) of Title 49 of the United States Code requires 
that the Department, as successor to the Civil Aeronautics Board, 
establish a Standard Foreign Fare Level (SFFL) by adjusting the SFFL 
base periodically by percentage changes in actual operating costs per 
available seat-mile (ASM). Order 80-2-69 established the first interim 
SFFL, and Order 98-04-05 established the currently effective two-month 
SFFL applicable through May 31, 1998.
    In establishing the SFFL for the two-month period beginning June 1, 
1998, we have projected non-fuel costs based on the year ended December 
31, 1997 data, and have determined fuel prices on the basis of the 
latest available experienced monthly fuel cost levels as reported to 
the Department.

[[Page 32038]]

    By Order 98-6-7 fares may be increased by the following adjustment 
factors over the October 1979 level:

Atlantic, 1.3284
Latin America, 1.4838
Pacific, 1.5152

    For further information contact: Keith A. Shangraw (202) 366-2439.

    By the Department of Transportation: dated June 5, 1998.
Charles A. Hunnicutt,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-15559 Filed 6-10-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
No. 12-503.

#### San Geronimo Caribe Project, Inc. *v.*Acevedo-Vila et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.