alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Defense Supplier Conference returns to Columbus, Ohio

/ Published April 7, 2022
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
After a four-year hiatus, Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime and the National Defense Industry Association brought the DLA Land and Maritime Supplier Conference and Exhibition back to downtown Columbus, Ohio, April 6-7. More than 800 defense industry representatives packed a ballroom in the Greater Columbus Convention Center for first day speakers, including Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment Steven Morani, DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic, and DLA Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Adm. Kristen Fabry.

Fabry welcomed attendees, saying, “It is imperative that we take these opportunities to get together and to work toward common goals with a uniform understanding of the challenges ahead.”

Gov. DeWine delivered a pro-military message to the audience. “Ohio truly cherishes its military installations,” he said. “We work very hard to make Ohio one of the most military-friendly states in the nation. That is our goal.”

Organizers hold the conference every two years but cancelled the event in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This year’s event is being held completely in person with no virtual participation.

Skubic’s remarks reflected her concern for the health of the defense industrial base. 

“One of DLA’s most important strategic lines of effort involves strengthening defense industries, creating more resilient supply chains, and encouraging domestic capabilities for key industry sectors,” she said.

Collaborative breakouts occurred throughout the conference on a range of topics including additive manufacturing, microchips, future requirements, contracting and supply chain security. 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment Steven Morani also spoke on the first day of the conference. His remarks focused on the Department’s efforts to strengthen the health of the Defense Industrial Base, as well as a review of the Logistics and Materiel Readiness Strategic Plan.

More than 60 exhibitors staffed booths displaying their products with a backdrop of several enormous up-armored military vehicles. In all, more than 200 defense industry companies were represented among attendees. 

The DLA Land and Maritime Supplier Conference and Exhibition continued through April 7 with keynote speeches from Marine Maj. Gen. David Maxwell, Vice Director for the Joint Staff; Army Maj. Gen. Mark Simerly, commanding general of the U.S. Combined Arms Support Command; and Navy Vice Adm. William Galinis, commander for Naval Sea Systems Command.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eli Auslander, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 871]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered July 15, 2016, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly determined that probable cause existed for the issuance of the search warrants at issue. Although defendant challenges the proof of the reliability of the registered confidential informant, the warrant affidavit satisfied the requirement of a “minimum, reasonable showing that the informant was reliable” *(People v Griminger,*71 NY2d 635, 639 [1988]). The affiant, who was entitled to rely on information from fellow officers where applicable, provided specific information about how the informant had assisted the police in several ways that tended to demonstrate his ongoing reliability. The affiant had also met the informant personally, and had verified some of the information he provided.

Defendant’s request for a hearing under *People v Darden*(34 NY2d 177 [1974]) did not encompass a request for a summary report of the hearing. Since defendant never asked for such a report, its absence provides no basis for reversal *(see People v Clark,*54 NY2d 941, 943 [1981]; *People v Lowen,*100 AD2d 518, 519 [2d Dept 1984], *lv denied*62 NY2d 808 [1984]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Mines Management, Inc., a Idaho Corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Mines Management, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mines Management, Inc.



Date:  November 29, 2004

/s/ James H. Moore

________________________________

James H. Moore

Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40242 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HECTOR DIAZ-ZANOLETTI, also known as Hector Diaz, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-680-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hector DiazZanoletti raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Murillo-Lopez , 444 F.3d 337, 344-45 (5th Cir. 2006), which held that a California conviction for burglary of an inhabited dwelling house was equivalent to burglary of a dwelling and therefore was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, and by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),No. 06-40242 -2- which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# Employee Reflection: Kelly Camacho

/ Published Feb. 28, 2022
San Diego, California, 
                DLA Disposition Services West Region Environmental Protection Specialist Kelly Camacho.                            220115-D-D0441-7655                            DLA Disposition Services West Region Environmental Protection Specialist Kelly Camacho.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Courtesy photoVIRIN: 220115-D-D0441-7655**Describe your job:**

I monitor environmental compliance data and liaison with Battle Creek headquarters and West Region Environmental Operations to West sites. I also manage and coordinate scrap tire removals for the West tire sales contract.

**How long have you worked for the federal government, including military service?**

32 years.

**How long have you worked for DLA Disposition Services?**

28 years.

**Any good memories from your time with DLA?**

Being able to move around to different sites and working with people from all over the U.S and other countries when deployed. When we were in the office in San Diego, working together to complete our duties. Discussing disposal operations with other coworkers all in the same room.   

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction?**

Helping current environmentalists with clarification on issues with environmental data and regulations so we remain complaint.

**Any good advice you’ve received?**

Think before you speak.

**Where do you see yourself five years from now?**

Retired, starting my day with yoga or a walk outside, preferably at the beach. Not doing anything specific but doing whatever the day may bring and taking care of my mother.

**What was your first job?**

Working in a family-owned Italian restaurant as a hostess. Loved the food.

**Do you have a hero?**

My dad, Emeil Griffith.

______________________________________________________________________

DLA Disposition Services is celebrating its 50th Anniversary by reflecting on its mission, culture, and workforce. This series is highlighting leadership and employees throughout the agency, across the globe. Visit the historical page to learn more about the MSC and its history.
Science & Technology Foundations 

of Sustainability 

NACEPT Meeting

14 November 2011

• Sustainability Methods & Tools Guide
Green Book Framework

Level 1: Agency-Wide Process

Focus of the Guide

Sustainability Assessment & 

Management Process
S&T Sustainability Team

• Develop a science-based guide for 

practitioners

• First draft prepared by a team under the 

auspices of the Science and Technology Policy 

Council (STPC) led by ORD

• Team will engage thought leaders across EPA 

for input 

• Report will incorporate relevant examples 

from EPA programs and other sources

• Report will have external peer review
Sustainability Analytics: A Guide to Scientific Methods 

and Tools for Sustainability Assessment & Management 

Executive Summary 

PART A. The Need for a Scientific Approach to Sustainability

1. Background and Purpose 

2. Defining the Three Pillars of Sustainability

3. Urgency and Vision 

4. Role of Science & Technology in Advancing Sustainability 

PART B. Methodology Guidance for Practitioners

5. The Green Book Framework for Sustainability at EPA

6. Sustainability Assessment & Management Process

7. Overview of Sustainability Methods and Tools 

8. Sustainability Indicators and Metrics

9. Applying Sustainability Tools and Methods at EPA

Case studies

throughout
Sustainability Assessment Toolkit

• Assessment tools: quantify specific outcomes

– Risk assessment

– Life cycle assessment

– Environmental footprint analysis

– Ecosystem service valuation

– Inherency analysis

• Decision support tools: integrate multiple outcomes

– Cost-benefit analysis

– Eco-efficiency analysis

– Environmental justice

– Future scenario analysis

– Resilience analysis

– Integrated assessment models

– Sustainability impact assessment

Trade-off and

Synergy Analysis

Assessment

of Outcomes
Agency Engagement

• Case studies (many Programs and Regions)

- Leveraging and utilizing the Committee on Environment, 

Natural Resources, and Sustainability (CENRS) mapping 

exercise, EMC inventory, and ad hoc Science and Technology 

Policy Council (STPC) Sustainability Workgroup report

• Environmental Justice (EJ tools)

• Children’s Health 

• Agency risk assessment experts (NexGen)

• National Center for Environmental Economics (cost benefit 

analyses)

• LCA@EPA group (led by OSWER and ORD)

• Other federal agencies (CENRS ISTS and NAS Linkages study)
EPA Sustainability Science and Technology

EPA Internal Research

Science and 

Technology Policy 

Council (STPC)

Committee on 

Environment, Natural 

Resources and 

Sustainability (CENRS)

Sustainability 

Analytics

EPA External Research
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chad Piersig, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 222]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa Jackson, J.), rendered October 27, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Feinman and Gesmer, JJ.
# Fillmore Army Health Clinic vaccinates employees

/ Published May 21, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Fillmore U.S. Army Health Clinic staff at Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna, provided over 3,500 Moderna Covid-19 vaccines to over 1,600 installation employees assigned to New Cumberland and Naval Support Activity Mechanicsburg tenant organizations Jan. 7 – May 7.

Many of the employees receiving vaccines have continued to report to work on-site at the installation in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania. The vaccines were administered at a vaccine pod at the Defense Logistics Agency Morale, Welfare and Recreation Susquehanna’s fitness center. 

Vaccine pod support was provided through participating agencies including Letterkenny Occupational Health Clinic; DLA firefighters/emergency medical technicians; DLA Public Safety; Morale Welfare and Recreation; DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania; Fort Indiantown Gap and Dunham U.S. Army Health Clinic who provided both military and civilian employees for the large vaccination effort.

The vaccines were made possible through coordination between officials at DLA Distribution Headquarters and the Dunham Clinic at the U.S. Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 98-50094 Summary Calendar

_____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARTHA ELENA DE LA ROSA-VALENZUELA, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas USDC No. P-97-CR-151-1

_________________________________________________________________ December 31, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Martha Elena De La Rosa-Valenzuela appeals from the district
court’s denial of her motion to suppress the marijuana seized from h er vehicle. She argues that a Border Patrol agent’s tapping of her vehicle’s gas tank constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment and that such search was illegal because it was without
consent or probable cause. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. S ee United States v. Muniz-Melchor , 894 F. 2 d 1430, 1435-37 (5th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is2 A F F I R M E D.
|                                                                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                                      
|Price of Brownsville, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                                      
|Price of Brownsville, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 2.48  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-4017

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Camille Touche

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of South Dakota - Aberdeen

____________

 Submitted: April 13, 2017

Filed: June 12, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before RILEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Camille Touche brings this appeal after the district court1

 revoked her

supervised release on a federal sentence that she was serving, and imposed a

1

The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the

District of South Dakota.
revocation sentence of 11 months in prison and no additional supervised release. 

Twice before, the district court had revoked Touche’s supervised release, and imposed

revocation sentences and additional supervised release, for violations of her release

conditions. For reversal, Touche argues that her revocation sentence is illegal under

18 U.S.C. § 3583, because the cumulative total of her revocation prison terms exceeds

by one month the term of supervised release that was originally imposed, or that is

authorized for the underlying offense under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b). We affirm.

Touche’s argument fails. Under the law applicable to her offense, which she

committed in 2007, revocation sentences are not aggregated in determining statutory

limits. See United States v. Lewis, 519 F.3d 822, 824-25 (8th Cir. 2008) (former

§ 3583(e)(3) requirement to aggregate revocation prison sentences changed with April

30, 2003 addition of phrase “on any such revocation”; where original offense of

conviction was committed thereafter, plain language of § 3583(e)(3) permits

sentencing without considering or aggregating prison terms for prior revocations).2

Touche argues that Lewis was wrongly decided, but the decision is binding unless

overruled by the court en banc. See United States v. Lovelace, 565 F.3d 1080, 1085

(8th Cir. 2009). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw.

______________________________

2

Only when a court imposes both a revocation sentence and additional

supervised release do prior revocation prison terms limit the permissible sentence. 

See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h); United States v. Zoran, 682 F.3d 1060, 1063-64 (8th Cir.

2012). 

-2-
No. 09-11057.

#### Joe Thomas Bell, Petitioner v. District Court of Oklahoma, Oklahoma County, et al.

562 U.S. 860, 131 S. Ct. 135,

178 L. Ed. 2d 82,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6267.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma denied.
#### Com. v. Dinello 5

05/04/2016

37 MAL (2016)

5

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 661
No. 09-11241.

#### Don Boyd, Petitioner v. City of Columbia, South Carolina, et al.

562 U.S. 869, 131 S. Ct. 167,

178 L. Ed. 2d 98,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7024.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Davis Mata, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 641]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), rendered August 13, 2015, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, assault in the third degree, and false per-sonation, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of robbery in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt, including the element of larcenous intent *(see People v Knox,*137 AD3d 1330, 1331 [2016]; *Matter of Merriel B.,*9 AD3d 256 [2004]; *Matter of Eliazar G.,*4 AD3d 157 [2004]). Likewise, the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of assault in the third degree beyond a reasonable doubt, including the element that the complainant suffered a physical injury within the meaning of Penal Law §§ 120.00 and 10.00 (9) *(see Matter of Ashley M.,*35 AD3d 612 [2006]). Moreover, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt as to those crimes was not against the weight of the evidence.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court’s questioning of witnesses deprived him of a fair trial and due process is unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Charleston,*56 NY2d 886, 888 [1982]) and, in any event, without merit *(see People v Melendez,*31 AD3d 186 [2006]; *People v Walker,*182 AD2d 731 [1992]).

Leventhal, J.P., Hall, Hinds-Radix and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
No. 10M33.

#### Dennis C. Reed, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 820, 131 S. Ct. 377,

178 L. Ed. 2d 13,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6277.

October 4, 2010.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner granted.

*14Same case below, 605 Pa. 431, 990 A.2d 1158.
# Daylight saving time: Spring ahead this Sunday

/ Published March 11, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Daylight saving time returns this Sunday at 2 a.m. when most Americans set their clocks forward at 3 a.m.

The United States adopted daylight saving time when the Uniform Time Act of 1966 standardized time zones and daylight saving practices across the United States. 

The act allowed states to pass laws exempting themselves. The only states that don’t observe daylight saving time are Hawaii and most of Arizona. It’s also not observed by these U.S. territories: American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management fire officials use this time to remind employees to change batteries in smoke detectors and other home safety devices.

The National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code requires that a working smoke detector be installed in and outside every room used for sleeping, as well as on every level of the home including the basement. Homes that use wood or natural gas for fuel should also have a least one carbon monoxide detector.
#### Mooney v. Ashcraft

DA 16-0602

06/09/17

2017 MT 139N

Reversed

Dist. 10 (Judith Basin)