alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1995 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1995

    To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize migrant, 
 community and homeless health center programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 25 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr. Metzenbaum, Ms. Mikulski, 
Mr. Wofford, Mr. Bingaman, and Mr. Pell) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize migrant, 
 community and homeless health center programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Centers Reauthorization Act 
of 1994''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN HEALTH CENTER PROGRAMS.

    (a) Migrant Health Centers.--Section 329(h)(2)(A) of the Public 
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254b(h)(2)(A)) is amended by striking 
``1994'' and inserting ``1995''.
    (b) Community Health Centers.--Section 330(g) of such Act (42 
U.S.C. 254c(g)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``1994'' and inserting 
        ``1995''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ``1994'' and inserting 
        ``1995''.
    (c) Homeless Health Services.--Section 340(q)(1) of such Act (42 
U.S.C. 256(q)(1)) is amended by striking ``1994'' and inserting 
``1995''.
    (d) Public Housing Health Services.--Section 340A(p)(1) of such Act 
(42 U.S.C. 256a(p)(1)) is amended by striking ``and 1993'' and 
inserting ``through 1995''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending May 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Mark
King, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


  /s/ Mark King
------------------------------------
Mark King, President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 09-1513.

#### Lynn Duvall, Petitioner v. Missouri Department of Social Services, et al.

562 U.S. 838, 131 S. Ct. 165,

178 L. Ed. 2d 41,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5931.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District, denied.

Same case below, 304 S.W.3d 198.
No. 12-335.

#### Sanchez, on Behalf of Minor Child D. R.-S., et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

March 30 , 201 6

In Reply AIR

- 3

Refer To: SAC 84

- 02

Jess Brown

Environmental Manager

Collins Pine Company

29100 SW Town Center Loop W, Suite 300

Wilsonville, OR 97070

- 9315

Subject: Proposed PSD Permit Modification for Collins Pine Facility in Chester, California

Dear Mr. Brown :

This letter and the enclosed materials are in response to your application for a Clean Air Act Prevention

of Significant Deterioration (PSD) air quality permit to construct and operate a new dry electrostatic

precipitator (ESP) to control particulate matter emissions at the Collins Pine facility in Chester,

California. The dry ES P control equipment replaces a wet ESP system.

We have reviewed your application, and supporting materials, based on the criteria in the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) PSD regulations at 40 CFR 52.21. Enclosed are the proposed

PSD permit modification

, Ambient Air Quality Impact Report (AAQIR), and public notice. The public

notice announces the commencement of the public comment period for the proposed permit. The

public notice was published in the Chester Progressive Newspaper on We d nesd ay, March 30 , 201 6

.

If you have any questions, you may contact me at (415) 972

- 3974 or rios.gerardo@epa.gov , or Manny

Aquitania at (415) 972

- 3977 or aquitania.manny@epa.gov

.

Sincerely,

Gerardo C. Rios

Chief, Permits Office

Enclosurescc: 

### Joe Fish, Northern Sierra AQMD

Chris Verderber, Collins Pine Company

Steve Hill , Sierra Research

Robert Fletcher, CARB
No. 09-1519.

#### United States ex rel. Robert Pritsker, Petitioner v. Sodexho, Inc., et al.

562 U.S. 838, 131 S. Ct. 179,

178 L. Ed. 2d 42,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6038.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 364 Fed. Appx. 787.
No. 09-10032.

#### Nina Shahin, Petitioner v. Pamela A. Darling, et al.

562 U.S. 822, 131 S. Ct. 381,

178 L. Ed. 2d 16,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6538.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
No. 09-10948.

#### Montgomery Blair Sibley, Petitioner v. Estate of Harper Sibley, Jr.

562 U.S. 803, 131 S. Ct. 123,

178 L. Ed. 2d 5,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7718.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Florida, Third District, dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 36 So. 3d 108.
#### People v Brown

1st Dept: 149 AD3d 411

denied*
Finding ability beyond disabilities in the workforce
 
  By Natalie Skelton, DLA Aviation Public Affairs
  The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and other legislative actions before it, have helped individuals with disabilities make great strides in being considered as equals alongside their professional peers. Despite these changes in the law, changes in thinking among employers remains a challenge. Jennifer McDonough, a faculty member at Virginia Commonwealth University, spoke Oct. 30 in the Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, about overcoming this challenge at a presentation capping Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s month-long recognition of National Disability Employment Awareness Month. The event was hosted by the Command Programs Office, Command Support Directorate, in observance of NDEAM. McDonough’s work includes helping individuals find employment and determining accommodation needs. She asked the audience, “As a business owner or manager, you may be thinking, ‘Why should I hire people with disabilities?’” Among the many reasons, she said, are that more than 56 million people with disabilities live and work in the U.S. — that’s one in five who identify as having some form of disability. “This means it is highly likely you already employ individuals with disabilities,” she said. McDonough, who also serves as the director of training at VCU Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, also dispelled many myths associated with employing individuals with disabilities: - Sick days: Employees with disabilities take no more sick days or leave days than employees without disabilities.
- Performance: Employees with disabilities are consistently rated as having average or above average performance in a variety of fields, including in quality and quantity of work, flexibility to demands, attendance and safety.
- Accommodation: Fewer than half of surveyed employees with disabilities require special accommodation.
- Cost: Of the workers who do require some form of accommodation, that accommodation incurred a one-time cost just 36% of the time, and that cost was on average just $500. Only 3% of workers required ongoing costs related to accommodation. “Hiring individuals with disabilities makes business sense,” McDonough said. Representatives within DLA Aviation directorates attended the event and participated in a question and answer session at the end. At the event’s conclusion, DLA Aviation Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Manager Deborah Winston presented McDonough with a certificate of appreciation signed by Charlie Lilli, deputy commander, DLA Aviation. About NDEAM
National Disability Employment Awareness Month predates the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act. The awareness event began in 1945 when Congress declared the first week in October “National Employ the Physically Handicapped Week.” It was the return of service members with disabilities from World War II that prompted growing public interest in the workplace contributions of people with disabilities.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31232-31233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15071]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following

[[Page 31233]]

meeting of the Humanities Panel will be held at the Old Post Office, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy E. Weiss, Advisory Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Humanities, Washington, D.C. 20506; telephone (202) 
606-8322. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on 
this matter may be obtained by contacting the Endowment's TDD on (202) 
606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed meeting are for the purpose of 
panel review, discussion, evaluation and recommendation on applications 
for financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and 
the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including discussion of 
information given in confidence to the agency by the grant applicants. 
Because the proposed meeting will consider information that is likely 
to disclose trade secrets and commercial or financial information 
obtained from a person and privileged or confidential and/or 
information of a personal nature the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, pursuant 
to authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to 
Close Advisory Committee meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have 
determined that these meetings will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsections (c)(4), and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States 
Code.
    1. Date: June 29, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Room: 415.
    Program: This meeting will review applications for History Museums, 
Historical Societies & Historic Sites, submitted to the Division of 
Challenge Grants for projects at the May 1, 1998 deadline.
Nancy E. Weiss,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-15071 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2003, of ANR Pipeline Company (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Greg G. Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Greg G. Gruber
                                           Senior Vice President, Chief
                                           Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)

                                           November 10, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ANR Pipeline Company and will be retained by ANR Pipeline Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### In the Matter of William R. Exum, Petitioner, v Jonathan Lippman, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 870]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Deputy Chief Administrative Judge, dated December 14, 2001, which adopted the recommendation of a judicial hearing officer, made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of certain disciplinary charges and terminating him from his employment as a data entry clerk.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

There is substantial evidence in the hearing record to support the finding that the petitioner committed acts of misconduct, including excessive late arrivals to work, failure to perform his duties as a data entry clerk in a competent manner, and possession of marijuana *(see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176 [1978]; *Miller v Sise,*120 AD2d 653 [1986]). Further, given the fact that the petitioner received many written and oral warnings, including informal counseling sessions, the dismissal of the petitioner from his employment was not disproportionate to his misconduct *(see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 232-235 [1974]; *Matter of Hussey v Incorporated Vil. of Farmingdale,*251 AD2d 579, 580 [1998]). In addition, there is nothing to reasonably suggest that the disciplinary proceeding was motivated by bias *(see Matter of Rothenberg v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*237 AD2d 447, 448 [1997]).

*446The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Florio, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

AUG 20, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-11059

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00263-CR-001

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

PERCY MCCLINTON SNOW, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(August 20, 2007)

Before BLACK, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Dennis J. Knizley, appointed counsel for Percy Ellis Snow in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Snow’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                                        
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Montana Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Salt Caverns Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Intelligence Agency, Science and Technology Advisory 
Board Closed Panel Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of 
Public Law 92-463, As amended by Section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice 
is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Science and Technology 
Advisory board has been scheduled as follows:

DATES: 3-4 June 1998 (800am to 1600pm).

ADDRESSES: The Missile & Space Intelligence Center, Redstone-Arsenal, 
AL 35898-5500.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maj. Michael W. Lamb, USAF, Executive 
Secretary, DIA Science and Technology Advisory Board, Washington, D.C. 
20340-1328 (202) 231-4930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(l), 
Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed to the public. 
The Board will receive briefings on and discuss several current 
critical intelligence issues and advised the Director, DIA, on related 
scientific and technical matters.

    Dated: May 27, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-14697 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001026743
<NAME> EURAMAX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,934
<INVENTORY>                                     82,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,242
<PP&E>                                         150,323
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 399,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,672
<BONDS>                                        135,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   399,659
<SALES>                                        596,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               596,759
<CGS>                                          479,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  479,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                72,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   355
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,576
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,017
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,559
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,559
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>