alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

ANOORA RESOURCES CORPORATION

|List of Subsidiaries as at 1 July 2009                           | Country Of
      Incorporation
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------
|                                                                 |                               
|Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Of Anooraq Resources
      Corporation |                               
|N1C Resources Incorporation                                      | Cayman Islands                
|Anooraq Minera Mexicana                                          | Mexico                        
|                                                                 |                               
|Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Of N1C Resources                       |                               
|N2C Resources Incorporation                                      | Cayman Islands                
|                                                                 |                               
|Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Of N2C Resources                       |                               
|Plateau Resources (Pty) Ltd                                      | Republic of South Africa      
|                                                                 |                               
|51% Owned by Plateau Resources (Pty) Ltd                         |                               
|Richtrau No 179 (Pty) Ltd ("Holdco")                             | Republic of South Africa      
|                                                                 |                               
|100% Owned by Richtrau No 179 (Pty) Ltd                          |                               
|Boikgantsho Platinum Mine (Pty) Ltd                              | Republic of South Africa      
|Kwanda Platinum Mine(Pty) Ltd                                    | Republic of South Africa      
|Ga-Phasha Platinum Mine (Pty) Ltd                                | Republic of South Africa      
|Richtrau No 177 (Pty) Ltd ("Opco")                               | Republic of South Africa      
|Lebowa Platinum Mines Ltd                                        | Republic of South Africa      

---
#### Frantz, Matter of, v Venettozzi

3d Dept: 146 AD3d 1254

granted
No. 09-10741.

#### Reginald S. Lewis, Petitioner v. Jeffrey A. Beard, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 851, 131 S. Ct. 105,

178 L. Ed. 2d 64,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6138.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 581 F.3d 92.
---

---

# Exhibit 15.10

# LETTER OF CONSENT

We hereby consent to the reference to
our studies relating to the valuation of an embedded derivative included in a loan
agreement as of December 31, 2008 dated March 2009 and as of December 31, 2007 and 2006
dated March 2008 prepared for Elbit Imaging Ltd. (the Company), in the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 and to the
incorporation by reference of this Annual Report in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852 and No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820)
filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd, as required by the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission.

This consent is not to be construed
as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to
be filed with the Annual Report under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.

| |  | Very truly yours,/s/ 
BDO Ziv Haft Consulting & Management Ltd.
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

June 25, 2009 
Tel Aviv, Israel



---

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Olmeda, Appellant.

[62 NYS3d 805]—

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obús, J.), rendered September 8, 2014, as amended September 30, 2014, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of arson in the second degree and burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, in which it accepted the victim’s testimony and rejected defendant’s.

We perceive no reason for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Tom, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Oing and Singh, JJ.
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

October 7, 1994.

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 2073) entitled ‘‘An Act to designate the United States courthouse that

is scheduled to be constructed in Concord, New Hampshire,

as the ‘Warren B. Rudman United States Courthouse’, and

for other purposes’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENTS:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1 SECTION 1. WARREN B. RUDMAN UNITED STATES COURT2 HOUSE.

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse to

4 be constructed in Concord, New Hampshire, shall be known

5 and designated as the ‘‘Warren B. Rudman United States

6 Courthouse’’.

7 (b) LEGAL REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law,

8 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the

9 United States to the United States courthouse referred to

10 in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the

11 ‘‘Warren B. Rudman United States Courthouse’’.

12 SEC. 2. JAMIE L. WHITTEN FEDERAL BUILDING.

13 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at

14 the northeast corner of the intersection of 14th Street and

15 Independence Avenue, Southwest, in Washington, District
2

S 2073 EAH

1 of Columbia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jamie

2 L. Whitten Federal Building.’’

3 (b) LEGAL REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law,

4 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the

5 United States to the Federal building referred to in sub6 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jamie

7 L. Whitten Federal Building’’.

8 SEC. 3. WILLIAM H. NATCHER FEDERAL BUILDING AND

9 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

10 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United

11 States courthouse located at 242 East Main Street in Bowl12 ing Green, Kentucky, shall be known and designated as the

13 ‘‘William H. Natcher Federal Building and United States

14 Courthouse’’.

15 (b) LEGAL REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law,

16 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the

17 United States to the Federal building and United States

18 courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to

19 be a reference to the ‘‘William H. Natcher Federal Building

20 and United States Courthouse’’.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘An Act to designate

the Warren B. Rudman United States Courthouse, the

Jamie L. Whitten Federal Building, and the William H.
3

S 2073 EAH

Natcher Federal Building and United States Courthouse.’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2073

AMENDMENTS
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mediacom Capital Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Rocco B. Commisso, Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 11, 2003
    
    BY:
    
    /S/ ROCCO B. COMMISSORocco B. Commisso
Chief Executive OfficerBY:
    
    /S/ MARK E. STEPHANMark E. Stephan
Chief Financial Officer
No. 09-1560.

#### Franklin Duran, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 840, 131 S. Ct. 210,

178 L. Ed. 2d 46,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5942.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Same case below, 596 F.3d 1283.
No. 09-9786.

#### Mark Gesse, Petitioner v. George Neotti, Warden.

562 U.S. 842, 131 S. Ct. 71,

178 L. Ed. 2d 49,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5968.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 343 Fed. Appx. 283.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED
                               PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference,  in the  Registration
Statement  #333-65303 on Form S-3 and the Registration  Statement  #333-39327 on
Form S-8, of our report  dated  February 25, 1999 (except as to Note 14 which is
dated  March 4, 1999)  which  appears  on page F-2 of the annual  report on Form
10-KSB of Compu-DAWN, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                  /s/ Lazar Levine & Felix LLP
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                    LAZAR LEVINE & FELIX LLP

New York, New York
March 26, 1999


<PAGE>
161 A.3d 762

#### KIEWANDA SHABAZZ-HENRY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. CITY OF NEWARK AND GERARD PIACENZA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

March 9, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.
Exhibit 31.2

302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Debra P. Roe, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Monarch Cement
    Company;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
    of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
    the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
    statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
    by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material
    respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
    flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
    report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
    defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
    and have:

    a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
        supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
        registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
        to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
        in which this report is being prepared;

    b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
        the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
        the end of the period covered by this report based on such
        evaluation;

    c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred during the
        registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
        or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
        internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
    to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
    board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
        or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        control over financial information.


Date: August 14, 2003

                                         /s/ Debra P. Roe, CPA
                                         Debra P. Roe
                                         Chief Financial Officer and
                                         Assistant Secretary-Treasurer
No. 12-7418.

#### McCullough *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1642 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1642

  To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel PRINCESS 
                           XANADU OF MONACO.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 8 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

   Mr. Mack introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel PRINCESS 
                           XANADU OF MONACO.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel 
PRINCESS XANADU OF MONACO, United States official number 660847.

                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

InfoCure Corporation
Atlanta, Georgia

We hereby consent, as independent public accountants, to the inclusion in this 
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of our report dated February 19, 1999, on the 
financial statements of InfoCure Corporation (and to all references to our Firm)
and to the incorporation by reference of such report (and all references to our 
Firm) in InfoCure Corporation's Registration Statements as follows: Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-48829) Registration Statement on 
Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-71109 and Registration Statement on Form S-3 
(Registration Statement No. 333-       to be subsequently filed).

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
February 26, 1999
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Humphrey Udeh, Appellant.

[53 NYS3d 710]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ingram, J.), rendered July 20, 2015, convicting him of grand larceny in the first degree, scheme to defraud in the first degree, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, and health care fraud in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction of grand larceny in the first degree and scheme to defraud in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484, 491-492 [2008]). In any event, viewing it in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of the crimes of grand larceny in the first degree and scheme to defraud in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *{see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the opportunity of the finder of fact to view the witnesses, hear testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt as to the counts of grand larceny in the first degree and scheme to defraud in the first degree was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633, 646 [2006]).

*901The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Chambers, J.P., Sgroi, Duffy and Barros, JJ., concur.
#### Com. v. Neppach

12/02/2015

256 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1123
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2004

AN ACT

To extend until July 1, 1998, the exemption from

tain institutions of higher education.ineligibility based on a high default rate for cer-
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2004

AN ACT

To extend until July 1, 1998, the exemption from ineligibility

based on a high default rate for certain institutions

of higher education.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

4 The matter preceding clause (i) of section

5 435(a)(2)(C) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20

6 U.S.C. 1085(a)(2)(C)) is amended by striking ‘‘July 1,

7 1994’’ and inserting ‘‘July 1, 1998’’.

Passed the Senate March 25 (legislative day, February 22), 1994.

Attest:

Secretary.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2218

To provide authorization of appropriations for the Federal Emergency Food

and Shelter Program for fiscal years 1995 and 1996.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 21 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. GLENN (for himself and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To provide authorization of appropriations for the Federal

Emergency Food and Shelter Program for fiscal years

1995 and 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

4 Section 322 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

5 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11352) is amended to read as

6 follows:

7 ‘‘SEC. 322. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

8 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out

9 this title $187,560,000 for each of fiscal years 1995 and

10 1996.’’.
2

•S 2218 IS

Æ
# 2022 DLA Hall of Fame inductee: Keith Ford

/ Published Aug. 11, 2022
Fort Belvoir, VA, 
*Editor’s Note: This is one of six stories featuring 2022 DLA Hall of Fame inductees. A ceremony highlighting their contributions to the agency will be held Aug. 17 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex.*

A “Renaissance man” for Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support is a member of the 2022 DLA Hall of Fame.

Keith Ford, the former deputy director of the clothing and textiles supply chain, began his federal career in 1981 as a GS-5 contract specialist in the Subsistence Directorate with the Defense Personnel Support Center.

“Keith Ford is truly a Renaissance man when it comes to DLA Troop Support, as he possesses expert knowledge of contracting, finance, innovative logistics and customer support. This vast array of knowledge allowed him to examine and understand problems from multiple perspectives and develop world class solutions for warfighter support,” according to his nomination.

Throughout his career, Ford was as a leader in acquisition processes and worked toward improving customer support. He supervised the rollout of a prime vendor program in subsistence 20 years ago that’s still used today.

He served as comptroller from 2002 to 2008, overseeing the major subordinate command’s wartime requirements during operations Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Ford also helped lead the rollout of the Enterprise Business System at DLA Troop Support and was instrumental in incorporating it into DLA’s financial operations. 

As the deputy director of clothing and textiles, a position he held from 2008 to his retirement in 2016, Ford led a staff of more than 300 people through various uniform and equipment changes. His team developed contracts to support the development of protective equipment for deployed troops.

“Beyond knowledge and the solutions, Keith possessed the leadership skills to implement ideas and concepts. He did not back down from making tough decisions and could always be counted on to provide the personnel under him the support needed to implement solutions,” according to his nomination.

During his 35-year tenure at DLA Troop Support, Ford received the DLA Distinguished Career Service Award, DLA Exceptional Civilian Service Award and the DLA Silver Letter.
#### Com. v. Harvey

08/18/2016

138 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 195
No. 12-8636.

#### Stevens *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.