alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2054 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2054

To amend the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 to remove the 7 percent 
       interest rate limitation on certain Rural Electrification 
             Administration loans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 26 (legislative day, April 11), 1994

   Mr. Leahy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 to remove the 7 percent 
       interest rate limitation on certain Rural Electrification 
             Administration loans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF MAXIMUM INTEREST RATE LIMITATION ON FFB LOAN 
              REFINANCING.

    Section 306C of such Act (7 U.S.C. 936c) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ``, except that such 
        rate shall not be greater than 7 percent per year, subject to 
        subsection (d)''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (d).

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2345654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    49948
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    2804166
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6174678
<PP&E>                                         6602133
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3251946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                10914309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2271844
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        825649
<OTHER-SE>                                     4704818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  10914309
<SALES>                                       16245886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              16245886
<CGS>                                         12113238
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 14774561
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 75203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               62265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1396122
<INCOME-TAX>                                    550278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    845844
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02


</TABLE>
#### Com. v. Hill

04/12/2016

550 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 105
# L_2010182EN.01000301.xml

| 16.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 182/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 182/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 623/2010

of 15 July 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Farro di Monteleone di Spoleto (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Farro di Monteleone di Spoleto’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Farro di Monteleone di Spoleto’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 271, 12.11.2009, p. 24.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Farro di Monteleone di Spoleto (PDO)

---
# Marine Corps turns 245

/ Published Nov. 10, 2020
RICHMOND, VA, 
On this day, in 1775, the Second Continental Congress, meeting in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, passed a resolution establishing the Marine Corps to augment naval forces in the Revolutionary War. The recruiting headquarters was set up in the Tun Tavern on Water Street in Philadelphia, which is considered to be the birthplace of the Marines.

Years later, in 1883, Semper Fidelis, the Latin phrase meaning "always faithful,” would become the official of the Corps. Semper Fi embodies the promise to always remain faithful, no matter what.

In celebration of 245-years of faithful service, Marines assigned to Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Customer Operations Directorate’s United States Marine Corp Customer Facing Division held a cake cutting ceremony in the Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Nov. 10.

Capt. Sheena Grady served as master of ceremony for the event, which kicked off with a video that incorporated a message from the Commandant of the Marine Corps Gen. David Berger with personal stories of bravery from those Marines who served in World War II, Vietnam and Afghanistan.

Col. Larry Herring, chief of the USMC Customer Facing Division, gave a short, heartfelt speech about the importance of celebrating the birthday of the Corps.

“It is an opportunity for us as Marine’s to reflect back on our heritage and of those who came before us and the legacy and the foundation they laid for us,” he said.

Chicnee Brown, senior executive assistant within DLA Aviation’s Office of the Commander, was one of many who attended the ceremony. She retired from the Corps in 2012 after 15-years of service.

She said the Marine Corps birthday is special to her not just because it’s a tradition to celebrate the birth of her beloved Corps, but because of the values and ethos it stands for.

“The Marine Corps has taught me that despite racial inequality, civil unrest, and political differences, the few who earned the title of Marine past, present, and future, we are all brothers and sisters. I continue to live my life as a non-active duty Marine by our core values of honor, courage and commitment,” she said.
#### Com. v. Samuels

06/13/2016

78 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1037
Amendment 2 to Development, Commercialization and Supply License Agreement



 Exhibit 10.41 
  
                                 November 22, 2004 
  
 BY FACSIMILE AND EXPRESS MAIL 
 CONFIDENTIAL 
 Peter A. Lankau 
 President 
 Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. 
 100 Painters Drive 
 Chadds Ford, PA 19317 
  
 Re: Amendment 2 to Development, Commercialization and Supply License
Agreement 
  
 Dear Peter: 
  
 Reference is made to the Development, Commercialization and Supply License Agreement between
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Endo”) and DURECT Corporation (“DURECT”) effective November 8, 2002, as amended effective January 28, 2004 (“Agreement”). Effective on the date written above, Endo and DURECT hereby agree to
amend the Agreement as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment to Section 4.6(a). Section 4.6(a) of the Agreement shall be amended to replace each instance of “January 1, 2005” with “January 1, 2006”.


  

	 	2.	Amendment to Section 4.6(c). Section 4.6(c) of the Agreement shall be amended to replace each instance of “January 1, 2005” with “January 1, 2006”.


  

	 	3.	Amendment to Section 13.3(e). Section 13.3(e) of the Agreement shall be amended to replace “January 1, 2005” with “January 1, 2006” and “January 31,
2005” with “January 31, 2006”. 

  
 Except as set
forth above, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain the same. Please sign below to indicate Endo’s agreement to the foregoing. 
  

	
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 /s/ James E. Brown


	 James E. Brown

	 President and CEO



  

			
	 AGREED TO BY ENDO:

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Peter A. Lankau


	 	 	 Peter A. Lankau

	 	 	 President


  
 Date: Nov. 22, 2004
No. 09-10558.

#### Rafael Bankston, Petitioner v. Martin Veal, Warden.

562 U.S. 846, 131 S. Ct. 89,

178 L. Ed. 2d 56,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5855.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
================================================================================


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Annual Report of Terra  Systems,  Inc., on Form
10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2004, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Clayton Timothy,  CEO of
the Company, certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date: March 30, 2006


/s/ Clayton Timothy
------------------------------------------
Clayton Timothy
CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)

















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# L_2011143EN.01003801.xml

| 31.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 143/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 143/38

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

of 27 May 2011

establishing, pursuant to Directive 2006/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, a symbol for information to the public on bathing water classification and any bathing prohibition or advice against bathing

(2011/321/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Directive 2006/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC (1), and in particular point (a) of Article 15(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 12(1)(a) of Directive 2006/7/EC provides for an obligation to inform the public on the current bathing water classification and any bathing prohibition or advice against bathing by means of a clear and simple sign or symbol. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 12(1)(a) of Directive 2006/7/EC provides for an obligation to inform the public on the current bathing water classification and any bathing prohibition or advice against bathing by means of a clear and simple sign or symbol.

| (2) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 16(1) of Directive 2006/7/EC, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 16(1) of Directive 2006/7/EC,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the purpose of actively disseminating and promptly making available the information on bathing water classification and on any bathing prohibition or advice against bathing referred to in Article 12(1)(a) of Directive 2006/7/EC, the following symbols are hereby established:

| 1. | Symbols for informing on bathing prohibition or advice against bathing are set out in Part 1 of the Annex to this Decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Symbols for informing on bathing prohibition or advice against bathing are set out in Part 1 of the Annex to this Decision.

| 2. | Symbols for informing on bathing water classification are set out in Part 2 of the Annex to this Decision. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Symbols for informing on bathing water classification are set out in Part 2 of the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the first day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 May 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 64, 4.3.2006, p. 37.

1

---

ANNEX

PART 1

Symbols for informing on bathing prohibition or advice against bathing

PART 2

Symbols for informing on bathing water classification

---
#### Chouteau County v. Sayers

DA 16-0677

04/25/17

2017 MT 94N

Affirmed

Dist. 12 (Chouteau)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Williams, Appellant.

[48 NYS3d 606]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert E. Torres, J.), rendered August 6, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
Exhibit  32.1


                        CERTIFICATIONS  UNDER  SECTION  906


    Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and  (b)  of  section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the  undersigned  officers  of NeWave, Inc., a Utah corporation (the "Company"),
does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

    The  Annual  Report for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-KSB")
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-KSB  fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

    Dated:  April  13,  2004

                           /s/  Michael  Hill
                           --------------------
                           Michael  Hill,  Chief  Executive  Officer


    Dated:  April  13,  2004
                           /s/  Barrett  Evans
                           -----------------
                           Barrett  Evans,  Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer
# L_2011335EN.01007801.xml

| 17.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 335/78 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 335/78

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2011/845/CFSP

of 16 December 2011

concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 and Article 31(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 17 November 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/694/CFSP concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians (1), which provided for an extension of the validity of their national permits for entry into, and stay in, the territory of the Member States referred to in Common Position 2002/400/CFSP of 21 May 2002 concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians (2) for a further period of 12 months. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 17 November 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/694/CFSP concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians (1), which provided for an extension of the validity of their national permits for entry into, and stay in, the territory of the Member States referred to in Common Position 2002/400/CFSP of 21 May 2002 concerning the temporary reception by Member States of the European Union of certain Palestinians (2) for a further period of 12 months.

| (2) | On the basis of an evaluation of the application of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP, the Council considers it appropriate that the validity of those permits be extended for a further period of 12 months, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of an evaluation of the application of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP, the Council considers it appropriate that the validity of those permits be extended for a further period of 12 months,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Member States referred to in Article 2 of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP shall extend the validity of the national permits for entry and stay granted pursuant to Article 3 of that Common Position for a further period of 12 months.

Article 2

The Council shall evaluate the application of Common Position 2002/400/CFSP within six months of the adoption of this Decision.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2011.

For the Council

The President

T. NALEWAJK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 303, 19.11.2010, p. 13.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 138, 28.5.2002, p. 33.

2

---
#### Hertz Vehicles, LLC, Respondent, v Dariel Cepeda et al., Defendants, and Innovative Health Chiropractic, P.C., Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 529]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered on or about March 8, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant Innovative Health Chiropractic, P.C.’s request for attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed.

*441Defendant Innovative argues that, as the assignee of the rights of the no-fault claimants in the underlying automobile accident to whom it provided medical treatment, it successfully defended itself in this declaratory judgment action and thus should recover attorneys’ fees just as an insured may recover attorneys’ fees upon successfully defending itself against an action brought by its insurer for a judgment declaring that the insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify it *(see U.S. Underwriters Ins. Co. v City Club Hotel, LLC,*3 NY3d 592, 597-598 [2004], citing *Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co., 47*NY2d 12, 21-22 [1979]). This argument is unavailing.

The insured in the circumstances described above may recover attorneys’ fees because “an insurer’s duty to defend an insured extends to the defense of any action arising out of the occurrence, including a defense against an insurer’s declaratory judgment action” *(U.S. Underwriters,*3 NY3d at 597-598).

There is no such duty in this case, as Innovative is not an insured to which Hertz owes a duty to defend. Although Innovative was assigned the claimants’ rights for reimbursement of no-fault benefits, the claimants were only passengers in the insured vehicle at the time of the accident, and were not parties to whom Hertz owed a duty to defend *(Fiduciary Ins. Co. of Am. v Medical Diagnostic Servs., P.C.,*150 AD3d 498 [1st Dept 2017], citing *U.S. Underwriters,*3 NY3d at 597-598).

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

 

**                                                THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY                                                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                                                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                                                      SECTION 906                                                                           OF THE                                                    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the"Company") onForm 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30,2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the datehereof(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the dateindicatedbelow, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuanttoSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to The MonarchCement Company and will be retained by The MonarchCement Company and furnishedto the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

Dated:  November 8, 2007

|   |   |  /s/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.                 Walter H. Wulf, Jr.    President and     Chairman of the Board 
                                                   

 

 

  |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 10M1.

#### Dale G. Wills, Petitioner v. Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

562 U.S. 819, 131 S. Ct. 372,

178 L. Ed. 2d 9,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6666.

October 4, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00385-CV

Ruth Ann Beck, Appellant

v.

Gary G. Beck, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. FM007412, HONORABLE W. JEANNE MEURER, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Ruth Ann Beck has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal. This Court 

previously dismissed the appeal of Gary G. Beck on his motion. 

The appeal is dismissed in whole on motion of appellant. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

 

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before: Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed on Appellant=s Motion

Filed: October 3, 2002

Do Not Publish
#### Leoni v. Leoni

10/14/2015

397-400 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 385
#### Highway Supt. Assn. of Rockland, Inc., Matter of, v Town of Clarkstown

2d Dept: 150 AD3d 731

denied