alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Cameron, LA LNG Imports (Price) from Egypt (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Cameron, LA LNG Imports (Price) from Egypt (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan  | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2011                                                                                                                              | 9.08 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# In Their Own Words David Olenick, DLA Distribution

/ Published Nov. 19, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
These days we take direct deposit of our paychecks for granted. Listen to David Olenick, DLA Distribution, tell the interesting story on how he was part of the team that brought the innovative concept of direct deposit to DLA. To see the full interview and for more information about DLA's history visit: https://www.dla.mil/About-DLA/History/60th-Anniversary/

20:18VIDEO  | 20:18 |In Their Own Words David Olenick, DLA Distribution, DLA 60th Anniversary Interview
No. 12-8598.

#### Gray *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 09-10704.

#### Terence Bruce Richards, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

562 U.S. 850, 131 S. Ct. 99,

178 L. Ed. 2d 63,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6040.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
No. 10-5743.

#### Derrick Brown, Petitioner v. Ricardo E. Chavez, Warden.

562 U.S. 807, 131 S. Ct. 341,

178 L. Ed. 2d 9,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7693.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 22, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Charles Q. Chandler IV, Wichita, Kansas, and David T. Chandler, 
Pratt, Kansas, trustees of the David T. Chandler Trust No. 2, the Paul 
T. Chandler Trust No. 2, the George T. Chandler Jr. Trust No. 2, the 
George T. Chandler III Trust No. 2, the Barbara Ann Chandler Trust No. 
2, the Travis Chandler Jordan Trust No. 2, and the William Chandler 
Trust No. 2; to acquire voting shares of First Pratt Bankshares, Inc., 
Pratt, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First 
National Bank in Pratt, Pratt, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 2, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15026 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2130 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2130

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust the death benefit 
   limits for certain policies purchased to cover payment of burial 
      expenses or in connection with prearranged funeral expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 18 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

 Mr. Dole (for himself and Mr. Breaux) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust the death benefit 
   limits for certain policies purchased to cover payment of burial 
      expenses or in connection with prearranged funeral expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF DEATH BENEFIT LIMITS FOR CERTAIN POLICIES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (C)(i) of section 7702(e)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limited increases in death 
benefit permitted) is amended by striking ``$5,000'' and inserting 
``$7,000'' and by striking ``$25,000'' and inserting ``$34,000''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustments.--Section 7702(e) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (relating to computational rules) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Inflation adjustment to death benefit limits for 
        years after 1995.--In the case of any taxable year beginning in 
        a calendar year after 1995, each dollar amount contained in 
        paragraph (2)(C)(i) shall be increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, by substituting `calendar year 
                1994' for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                thereof.''
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 72(e)(10)(B) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``$25,000'' and inserting 
``$34,000''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to contracts entered into on and after January 1, 1995.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Gary Meyers, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that

|Date: March 14, 2008 |  | By:    | /s/GARY MEYERS                                                               
|-------------------- |  | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | Name:  | Gary Meyers                                                                  
|                     |  | Title: | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

I,
John J. Hanlon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that

|Date: March 14, 2008 |  | By:    | /s/JOHN J. HANLON                                                                             
|-------------------- |  | ------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | Name:  | John J. Hanlon                                                                                
|                     |  | Title: | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Synplicity, Inc., and will be retained by Synplicity, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Michigan Heritage Bancorp (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Richard Zamojski, Chief Executive Officers of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. /s/Richard ZamojskiRichard ZamojskiChief Executive OfficerMarch 8, 2004
 58
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2250

___________________________

Juan Gustavo Torres-Perez

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

 ____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

 ____________

 Submitted: May 7, 2019

Filed: June 27, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before ERICKSON, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Mexican citizen Juan Gustavo Torres-Perez petitions for review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decision of an

immigration judge denying asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

Convention Against Torture. After careful consideration of the petition, we find no

basis for reversal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1) (asylum eligibility requirements);
Garcia-Milian v. Lynch, 825 F.3d 943, 945 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review). 

Accordingly, the petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Demorest,Chief Executive Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of MOCON, Inc.

 

 

Date:  November 13, 2009

 
| /s/ Robert L. Demorest  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Robert L. Demorest      |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                 SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN DENTAL PARTNERS, INC.


PDHC, Ltd., a Minnesota corporation
Texas Dental Partners, Inc., a Texas corporation
Northpark Dental Group, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation
American Dental Partners of Georgia, Inc., a Georgia corporation
American Dental Partners of Louisiana, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of Pennsylvania, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
American Dental Partners of Wisconsin, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Apple Park Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Orthocare, Ltd., a Minnesota corporation
Oral Healthcare Corporation, a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of Ohio, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Innovative Practice Concepts, Inc., an Arizona corporation
American Dental Professional Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of Virginia, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of Maryland, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of Alabama, Inc., an Alabama corporation
American Dental Partners of California, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of Oklahoma, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of North Carolina, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of New York, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Dental Partners of Indiana, Inc., a Delaware corporation
National Dental Alliance, Inc., a Delaware corporation
National Financial Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation

                                      55
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40547

Summary Calendar

 __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STEWART ROLAND NUZZI,

 DefendantAppellant.

------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

-------------------------------------------------------

November 13, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stewart Roland Nuzzi appeals a jury conviction for using or carrying a firearm in relation to

a drug-trafficking offense; he contends that the evidence was insufficient.

The record contains sufficient evidence that, when viewed in the light most favorable to the

verdict, would allow a rational jury to conclude beyond a reasonable that Nuzzi carried a firearm in

relation to the drug-trafficking offense. See United States v. Lopez, 74 F.3d 575, 577 (5th Cir.
 

1996). The evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom support a finding that Nuzzimoved

or transported two handguns and placed them within arm’s length or easy reach of where he was

when police arrested him for possession with intent to distribute illegal drugs. See United States v.

Wainuskis, 138 F.3d 183, 186-87 & n.12 (5th Cir. 1998). The evidence also established that the

“carrying” of the firearms facilitated or had the potential to facilitate the drug-trafficking offense.

United States v. Ceballos-Torres, 218 F.3d 409, 415 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v. Tolliver, 116

F.3d 120, 126 (5th Cir. 1997). The judgment is AFFIRMED.

Nuzzi has moved, pro se, for substitution of counsel and for an extension of time in which to

file a supplemental brief. The counsel that Nuzzi asserts he was in the process of retaining has not

made an appearance, and the case had already been fully briefed when Nuzzi filed his pro se motion.

Consequently, the motion is DENIED as untimely. Cf. United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902

(5th Cir. 1998).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
No. 09-1381.

#### Carolyn Mitchell, Petitioner v. Anchorage Police Department, et al.

562 U.S. 831, 131 S. Ct. 103,

178 L. Ed. 2d 30,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6226.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 344 Fed. Appx. 413.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1557]



[[Page 3579]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the notice of the February 6 
meeting of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication 
Disorders Communication Disorders Review Committee which was published 
on January 14, 1998, 63 FR 2252.
    The meeting was announced as a meeting of the Communication 
Disorders Review Committee. The meeting is actually a meeting of the 
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders 
Special Emphasis Panel.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.173 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders)

    Dated: January 15, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-1557 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Tirey v. State MSP

OP 17-0188

04/18/17

Denied

Original Proceeding Habeas Corpus
# 380th POL’s million-gallon duties

/ Published Sept. 15, 2021
AL DHAFRA AIR BASE, United Arab Emirates, 
When it comes to providing direct support to the aircraft of Al Dhafra Air Base, including the E-3 Sentry, KC-10 Extender, and RQ-4 Global Hawk, the various types of fuel required play a key part in the mission. Fortunately, ADAB has some of the most talented Airmen in the world handling that fuel.

The 380th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadron Fuels Flight, also known as Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants flight, or POL, provides, stores, tests and distributes fuel in operation of the Department of Defense’s largest tactical fuel site.

“Since our rotation began in April, we’ve handled the storage and oversight of over 86-million gallons of fuel,” said U.S. Air Force Senior Airman Giovanni Saquilan, 380th POL fuels storage technician. “The fuel comes from an off-base provider, but we store, test, secure, and make sure it’s accessible when needed.”

Saquilan, the two-time Fuels Technician of the Month for ADAB, was responsible for training four new fuels personnel on the local operating procedures since each base differs slightly in fuels management.

At ADAB, the fuels bulk storage section maintains a Type III Hydrant System with two “Bubba” tanks, 27 210-thousand gallon fuel bladders, and a number of other 50-thousand gallon bladders. The Bubba tanks are the primary storage systems while the bladders are used to maintain a fuel reserve.

“There are miles of underground pipes leading from the Bubbas out to the flightline,” said U.S. Air Force Master Sgt. Tyrone McDougal, 380th POL noncommissioned officer in charge of fuels facilities. “From there, it’s over to the distribution side of the house.”

The POL distributions section is no slouch when it comes to pumping out enormous numbers, with six Airmen able to proudly proclaim they’ve personally pushed millions of gallons of fuel to aircraft.

The POL Runner of the Month for August and Airman with the most completed fuel service requests in this deployment rotation, U.S. Air Force Airman 1st Class Nasir Lewis, 380th POL distributions operator, says, “The pace of the mission and the number of different types of aircraft here at ADAB make the job challenging.”

“This is a 24-hour mission so we grind day and night, but it all feels worth it knowing the impact we have throughout the area of responsibility when fueling the aircraft for missions,” he continued.

Knowing how critical their operations are, the POL Airmen consistently operate in high gear to stay mission ready.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Air Forces Central website.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joel Herrera, Appellant.

[58 NYS3d 319]

*602Judgment, New York County (Carol Berkman, J. at suppression hearing; A. Kirke Bartley, Jr., J. at first part of trial; Jill Konviser, J. at second part of trial and sentencing), rendered June 26, 2012, convicting defendant of manslaughter in the first degree and gang assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress statements and physical evidence. The totality of the chain of information known to the police *(see generally People v Shulman,*6 NY3d 1, 26 [2005]), notably including defendant’s false explanation for, and attempt to conceal, his bloody condition, provided probable cause for his arrest, notwithstanding the inability of two witnesses to identify him at the scene. Defendant’s statements were voluntary under all the circumstances, and the police did not use any tactics designed to overbear defendant’s will *(see Arizona v Fulminante,*499 US 279, 288 [1991]; *People v Anderson,*42 NY2d 35, 41 [1977]).

Defendant did not preserve his claim that he invoked his right of silence, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that when viewed in context, the comments cited by defendant did not constitute unequivocal invocations of the right to remain silent or requests that the interview be terminated *(see People v Cole,*59 AD3d 302 [1st Dept 2009], *lv denied*12 NY3d 924 [2009]).

The court presiding over the latter portions of the trial (when the first justice became unavailable) providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s mistrial motion made after the prosecutor asked about defendant’s gang nickname. Defendant never answered the question, which was immediately stricken from the record, and the court’s instructions were sufficient to avoid any prejudice *(see People v McCaa,*16 AD3d 139 [1st Dept 2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 765 [2005]). The record does not establish that the prosecutor’s question was a deliberate violation of a *Sandoval*ruling. Defendant’s other argument about the prosecutor’s cross-examination is unavailing.

Defendant’s general objections failed to preserve his challenges to portions of an expert’s testimony and to a related portion of the prosecutor’s summation, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that defendant opened the door to the challenged matters.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur—*603Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.