alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Barstow site lead honored for 1st quarter performance

/ Published Feb. 25, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Property Disposal Specialist Heath Buswell was recently named Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Employee of the Quarter for his contributions at the start of fiscal 2021.

                Property Disposal Specialist Heath Buswell serves as site lead at DLA Disposition Services at Barstow, California. He was selected as Employee of the Quarter for the 1st quarter of fiscal 2021.                            Property Disposal Specialist Heath Buswell                            Property Disposal Specialist Heath Buswell serves as site lead at DLA Disposition Services at Barstow, California. He was selected as Employee of the Quarter for the 1st quarter of fiscal 2021.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA courtesy photoVIRIN: 210219-D-D0441-4321Buswell has been with the agency for the past five years and is currently stationed in California, where he serves as DLA Disposition Services Barstow’s site lead. He previously worked at Camp Pendleton as a material examiner and identifier.

“I really enjoy supporting the warfighter,” Buswell said. “I get the opportunity to mentor team members, interact with leadership at all levels, and I get to go out to train and see our customers. I consider it one of the most rewarding things I can do in continuing my service.”

Buswell’s supervisor, Christopher Camacho, cited his professional attitude and extraordinary customer service ability as reasons he deserved recognition.

“He has gone above and beyond when assisting customers with turn ins and excelled in developing an effective cost savings plan to dispose of body armor, components, and [demilitarization]-required textiles,” Camacho wrote.

Buswell was also cited for decreasing aged property, exceeding deadlines, and filling in for the area manager when needed.

“Mr. Buswell’s hard work and dedication is the driving force behind the success of DLA Disposition Services Barstow,” Camacho wrote.

For his part, Buswell said his site is on the right path and its personnel are learning and growing as a team.

“I work with some amazing and professional people,” Buswell said. “I think the organization is great and I am looking forward to being a team member until it is time for me to retire for good.”
1Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-31016

ANDERSON 2000 INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff-Appellant

VERSUS

NATIONAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, 

doing business as Nebraska Boiler Company,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Middle District of Louisiana

(96-CV-146-A)

June 5, 1998

Before DUHÉ, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
Exhibit
15.11



CONSENT



We
hereby consent to the reference to our valuation of options granted by Elbit Imaging Ltd. during the year ended December 31, 2014,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging Ltd., and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report
in the Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-194519) and in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (Registration
No. 333-172122) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and
No. 333-152820) of Elbit Imaging Ltd.



This
consent is not to be construed as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to be filed
under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



|/s/
    BDO Ziv Haft Consulting and Management Ltd. | 
|--------------------------------------------------- | 
|BDO
    Ziv Haft Consulting and Management Ltd.     | 
|                                                    | 
|Tel-Aviv,
    Israel                                | 
|November
    9, 2017                                |
#### In the Matter of George Nash, Appellant, v Nassau County et al., Respondents.

[52 NYS3d 670]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Acting Commissioner of the Nassau County Police Department, dated July 24, 2015, which denied the petitioner’s application to reinstate his pistol permit and continued its revocation, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), dated December 14, 2015, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

*1121Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner’s pistol permit was suspended and subsequently revoked after a domestic incident involving the petitioner and his wife. After the petitioner was acquitted of criminal charges arising from the incident, he sought reinstatement of his permit and the return of his firearms. The Deputy Commanding Officer of the Nassau County Police Department’s Pistol Licensing Section determined that the petitioner’s permit should be revoked. Following an administrative appeal, that determination was upheld by the Acting Commissioner. The petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, contending that the determination denying his application to reinstate his pistol permit, and continuing its revocation, was arbitrary and capricious. The Supreme Court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. The petitioner appeals.

The Acting Commissioner, as the licensing officer *(see*Penal Law § 265.00 [10]), is vested with broad discretion in determining whether to issue or revoke a license to possess firearms (see Penal Law § 400.00 [11]). Our power to review the Acting Commissioner’s determination upholding the denial of the petitioner’s application to reinstate his pistol permit, and continuing its revocation, is limited to determining whether the Acting Commissioner’s determination was arbitrary and capricious or was instead supported by a rational basis in the record (see *Matter of Martino v Nassau County Police Dept.,*66 AD3d 781, 781-782 [2009]; *Matter of Moreno v Cacace,*61 AD3d 977, 978 [2009]; *Matter of Simmons v New York City Police Dept. License Div.,*35 AD3d 748, 749 [2006]; *Matter of Papaioannou v Kelly,*14 AD3d 459, 460 [2005]). Here, as the Supreme Court properly found, the record before the Acting Commissioner provided a rational basis for his determination upholding the denial of the petitioner’s application to reinstate the permit, and continuing its revocation (see *Matter of Martino v Nassau County Police Dept.,*66 AD3d at 782). Accordingly, the Supreme Court’s order and judgment denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding should be affirmed.

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Balkin and Barros, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15101]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-229-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

June 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 29, 1998, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing its Annual 
Take-or-Pay Reconciliation Filing pursuant to Section 37 of the General 
Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 
1. More specifically, Williston Basin filed the following tariff sheet:

Second Revised Volume No. 1
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 321

    Williston Basin has requested that the Commission accept this 
filing to become effective July 1, 1998.
    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheet is being filed 
to reflect recalculated fixed monthly surcharge to be effective during 
the period July 1, 1998 through September 30, 1998 pursuant to the 
procedures contained in Section 37 of the General Terms and Conditions 
of Williston Basin's FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15101 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.10

Letter Agreement

This Agreement dated June 20, 2000 is entered into by and between EPIQ Systems, Inc., hereinafter called "Borrower", and Gold Bank, of Leawood,
Kansas, or its successors or assigns, hereinafter called "Lender".

Whereas
Lender has approved a $2,500,000 Guidance Line of Credit to Borrower for equipment purchases. The terms of this financing are as follows:

Borrower
will submit to Lender invoices representing the purchased equipment submitted for financing.

Lender
will prepare a Promissory Note in an amount equal to the purchase price of the equipment.

The
Promissory Note will call for equal monthly payments of principal and interest in an amount sufficient to fully repay debt over 36 months.

The
Promissory Note will be secured by the specific equipment purchased which will be described on a Security Agreement and a UCC-1 Financing Statement.

Promissory
Note will bear and interest rate equal to the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of the date of the Promissory Note, and will remain fixed at that rate to the Notes'
maturity date.

Lender
will finance individual equipment purchases, or groupings of equipment purchases on individual Promissory Notes each conforming the terms described above, up to a maximum
financing of $2,500,000 at any given time.

This
Agreement will expire on June 20, 2001, at which time we will review for renewal.

|Lender:                      |  | Borrower:         
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------
|Gold Bank                    |  | EPIQ Systems, Inc.
|                             |  | /s/TOM W. OLOFSON 
|Julie L. Hook,Vice President |  | Tom W. Olofson,CEO

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.1


                              POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned hereby appoints Robert T. Slezak as his agent and
attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form
10-K relating to the year ending September 25, 1998, and any amendments
thereto, required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
Ameritrade Holding Corporation.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the 24th day of November, 1998.





/s/ Gene L. Finn
----------------
Gene L. Finn, Director
# Property disposal team to get new deputy

/ Published June 24, 2022
BATTLE CREEK, Mich. , 
U.S. Army Col. Andre L. Toussaint has been selected as the next Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services deputy director.

“                U.S. Army Col. Andre L. Toussaint has been selected as the next Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services deputy director.                            DLA Disposition Services Incoming Deputy Director                            U.S. Army Col. Andre L. Toussaint has been selected as the next Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services deputy director.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Kelly BurellVIRIN: 220624-D-D0441-400"I look forward to working with Col. Toussaint; his expertise and years of experience is added value to our leadership team,” said DLA Disposition Services Director Mike Cannon. “As for Col. Taylor, I applaud her exemplary performance during her tenure at DLA Disposition Services and I wish her luck at her new assignment.”

A San Diego, California, native, Toussaint received his commission through the Reserve Officers Training Corps as a Distinguished Military Graduate and entered active duty as a second lieutenant in the Transportation Corps in 1999.

He holds a Master of Science degree in logistics management from Florida Institute of Technology, as well as a Bachelor of Arts degree in English and foreign languages from Norfolk State University, where he graduated with honors.

Toussaint is currently attending Joint Advanced Warfighting School, Joint Forces Staff College, National Defense University in Norfolk, Virginia. 

Some of his most recent assignments include positions as Commander, 837th Transportation Battalion at Pier 8 in Busan, South Korea; and Deputy Commander, 7th Transportation Brigade, Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia.

His personal awards include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal (with three oak leaf clusters), Army Commendation Medal with 2 Oak Leaf Clusters, Joint Service Achievement Medal, and Army Achievement Medal (with two oak leaf clusters).

Toussaint is married to Lakisha Toussaint, and they have two daughters.

Col. Fran Taylor will continue her career at the U.S. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania.
# Medical provides support to veteran Warfighters 

/ Published June 17, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
A global pandemic that has the majority of employees working from home didn’t stop the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support from welcoming two new customers in May. 

The Medical Customer Operations Collective (Whole of Government) division recently on boarded the Armed Forces Retirement Homes in response to a high-visibility request that came down from the Office of the Assistant of the Secretary of Defense Health Affairs.

The AFRH is the nation's only federally-run retirement home for retired enlisted members and their families, housing more than 1,000 veterans in their two campuses in Washington D.C. and Gulfport, Miss.

Yvonne Poplawski, Medical Collective/Foreign Military Sales division chief, said her team was able to bring AFRH into the Troop Support fold in record time.

“Our team was able to get them up and running in lightning speed, providing them with a [Department of Defense Activity Address Code], generating trading partner agreements and training them in our Medical/Surgical Prime Vendor web ordering system, as well as FedMall,” she said. “From the time we got the call to when they made their first order was under six weeks.”

AFRH’s initial orders were for personal protective equipment such as nitrite gloves, medical gowns and masks, but future orders may expand to a wide range of medical supplies and beyond.

“Through the training we provided in our medical ordering systems and FedMall, we expect orders to increase in the future,” said Peter Skillings, Medical Collective/Foreign Military Sales supervisor. “We not only brought aboard a new medical customer, we brought on a new DLA customer able to buy throughout the organization.”

FedMall is a government e-commerce acquisition platform used by the U.S. military services as well as federal, state and authorized local governmental agencies.

Trang Phan, tailored vendor logistics specialist, led the training to bring AFRH up to speed with the DLA ordering process, and was impressed with the quick learning of the AFRH staff. 

“They were able to pick everything up and moved from the training to putting in orders very quickly,” said Phan.

Poplawski expressed pride in the medical team and the work they accomplished in support of AFRH.

“I just want to give kudos to the team,” she said. “They were able to efficiently and professionally bring the AFRH aboard, and it’s an honor that DLA will be able to help support some of our nation’s veterans during the golden years of their lives.”
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7404

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

NORRIS JUANDRON BROWN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:13-cr-00843-RBH-2)

Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norris Juandron Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker 

Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Norris Juandron Brown appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence 

reduction. We generally review an order granting or denying a 

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for abuse of discretion. See United 

States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004). We review

de novo, however, a district court’s determination of the scope 

of its authority under § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Dunphy, 

551 F.3d 247, 250 (4th Cir. 2009). Here, because Brown was 

sentenced as a career offender, Amendment 782 to the Sentencing 

Guidelines, which reduced the offense levels applicable to drug 

offenses, did not have the effect of lowering his applicable 

Guidelines range. We therefore affirm the district court’s 

order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

DATE: December 28, 2018

CASE OF: SUZANNE HARVEY, ETC. V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY

DOCKET NO.: SC17-85 OPINION FILED: September 20, 2018

ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS

THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION HAS BEEN MADE IN THE ABOVE 

OPINION:

On p. 2, first full paragraph, line 6, the word “insurers” was changed to “insureds.”

SIGNED: OPINION CLERK

The corrected hard copy will follow.
#### Com. v. Tevis 30

04/04/2016

436 WAL (2015)

30

. Justice DONOHUE and Justice WECHT did not participate in the consider* ation or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 92
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Helen Barbato, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 642]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obús, J.), rendered May 28, 2015, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order.

*587Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Acosta, P.J., Richter, Feinman, Webber and Kahn, JJ.
Order entered January 23, 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 23
- 00056
- CV
IN RE MARCOS GONZALEZ , Relator
O riginal Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Cour t

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 21
- 09623

O RDER Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel This original proceeding challenges a December 7, 2022 “Order on Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Compel Production of Defendant Marco Gonzalez’ s Medic al Records ” signed in the 192nd District Court, Dallas County, Texas by the Honorable Kristina Williams, whose term expired on December 31, 2022. Also before the Court is relator’s January 19, 2023 “ Motion for Temporary Relief Pending Mandamus. ” Relator’s motion for temporary relief is DENIED

. Rule 7.2(b) requires this Court to abate this proceeding to allow the successor judge to reconsider the challenged order. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 7.2(b) (“Ifthe case is an original proceeding under Rule 52, the court mus t abate the

proceeding to allow the successor to reconsider the original party ’ s decision.”). Accordingly, we ABATE this original proceeding pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b). This case is removed from the Court’s active docket
until f urther order of this Court to allow the successor judge to reconsider the December 7, 2022 ruling of the former judge of the 192nd District Court . We further ORDER the parties to file a status report with this Court within TEN DAYS of any ruling by the suc cessor judge required by rule 7.2(b).

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.3

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statement of Elbit Systems Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No.
333-9354) pertaining to the employees stock option plan of our report dated February 15,
2006, with respect to the financial statements of Tadiran Electronic Systems Ltd. included
in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.
Brightman Almagor & Co.
A member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

June 22, 2006