alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DSCC activities support Domestic Violence Awareness Month

/ Published Sept. 30, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
October has been National Domestic Violence Awareness Month since 1981. The observance serves to educate communities, individuals, couples and families about the Family Advocacy Program services and other community resources that can help prevent domestic violence, raise awareness of community responsibility, and inform the community of the many ways to report domestic abuse.

Over the years the definition of domestic violence has evolved to include not just individuals who are married or living together, but also former spouses, those who share a child in common, or a current or former intimate partner with whom the abuser shares or has shared a common domicile.  Because of the change in individuals who are included in this expanded definition, domestic violence is also often referred to as intimate partner abuse.

During the current COVID-19 health emergency, domestic violence has become both more acute and more hidden.  In the current environment, many victims have more stress in their lives and fewer choices when considering leaving an abusive relationship.  As social contacts have been reduced, there are fewer opportunities for domestic violence victims to reach out for help, but there are things we can all do to provide assistance.  If you think someone you know is being abused, stay connected, check on them and educate yourself on available resources.  Only a victim can decide to leave a relationship but as a community we can provide the information and support they need to leave. Visit the Defense Supply Center Columbus MWR Domestic Violence webpage more information on resources.

The awareness events the DSCC Family Advocacy Program is sponsoring this October are predominately virtual, but you can still participate while on the installation. 

You can show solidarity with domestic violence victims by visiting Hope Garden located on the north side of Mission Park and placing a stone on the Domestic Violence Awareness Pedestal.  If you are looking for information on domestic violence, visit the Domestic Violence Prevention Information Door  in Building 20, Pod B Room 145N. 

If you aren’t physically on DSCC in October, you can still show your support by visiting the DSCC MWR Domestic Violence Prevention webpage to get more information on Domestic Violence or the Standing Witnesses, or participate virtually in our “Wear Purple Day” on October 22 by sending DSCC MWR a picture of yourself wearing purple for posting on the DSCC MWR Facebook page.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 30, 2014

NO. 03-12-00669-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Marcus Tyler Scheffield, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the order entered by the district court suppressing appellee’s statements to 

the New Braunfels Police Department. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, 

the Court holds that there was reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court reverses the 

district court’s order and remands the case for further proceedings. Because appellee is indigent 

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
No. 09-10655.

#### Kurby Decker, Petitioner v. Chequita Dunbar, et al.

562 U.S. 848, 131 S. Ct. 96,

178 L. Ed. 2d 60,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6001,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 509.
# Disposition Services Central director wraps up tour of duty

/ Published June 16, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich, 
                Lt. Col. Jason Logan's family welcomes him home from serving as Disposition Services Central Director.                            Disposition Services Central director wraps up tour of duty                            Lt. Col. Jason Logan's family welcomes him home from serving as Disposition Services Central Director.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Jason ShambergerVIRIN: 210616-D-D0441-100Army Lt. Col. Jason Logan has served as the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Director of Central region for the past year. Witnessing firsthand the DLA milestones achieved within the area, Logan’s tour of duty ending coincides with a monumental event within the region.

“The biggest change to Central is the Afghanistan mission going away,” said Logan. “We went from four locations when I first got on the ground, and a civilian and military mix of personnel that was in country supporting that mission [to withdrawing from the country].”

Throughout his time serving as director of the region, Logan had the opportunity to work with a diverse workforce to include civilians, military reservists, active-duty military from the Air Force, Army and Navy. The team’s various backgrounds served as an aid to help get the job done each and every day.  

“When all of these pieces come together, it can pose a challenge to accomplish the mission,” Logan said, “But in this case, everyone has come together for the good of the organization and overcome the challenges.”

For Logan, looking back on his time in Central will remind him of the many positive experiences and lessons learned.

“This assignment has been an incredible learning experience for me professionally,” said Logan, “I am immensely thankful for the many relationships I have made over the last year with incredibly smart, caring and committed team members.”

Logan and his family are relocating to Ft. Eustis as he joins the Futures Integration Directorate in Futures Command to take on his next challenge.
# FILE

JUN 2 8 2016

N ci_ IC LI DEMAN T IKt M eI= ( MM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, F/KJA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWALT, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST2006-0A7 MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-0A7, A/K/A BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, F/K/A BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006- 0A7, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-0A7, Appellant,
vs. TRP FUND IV, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Respondent. No. 69879



### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court order granting a motion for summary judgment in a quiet tide action. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that the claims asserted in its third-party complaint against Isaac and Linda Szlamkowicz remain pending in the district court. Appellant does not dispute that these claims remain pending in the district court. Instead, appellant asserts that the district court entered an order to statistically close this case and that order constitutes a final judgment in this matter, after which it timely filed a notice of appeal.

Respondent filed a third-party complaint against Isaac and Linda Szlamkowicz in the district court on September 28, 2015, and

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A i ■ a179. 

## L o - 2.0 110Pickering 

# 7 , J.

Saitta 

### J. served them with copies of the complaint. No district court order appears to resolve the third-party complaint. Accordingly, the claims against Isaac and Linda Szlamkowicz remain pending in the district court such that the order granting the motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment appealable pursuant to NEAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV, Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000) (a final judgment is one that resolves all claims and issues against all parties and leaves nothing for the district court's future determination except for post-judgment issues); see also Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984) (this court may only consider appeals that are authorized by statute or court rule). And appellant's argument that the order statistically closing the case is a final adjudication of the case lacks merit. Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 37, 301 P.3d 850 (2013). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal,' and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 2



# Alt J. Hardesty

'Appellant may file a notice of appeal from any appealable order entered by the district court.

2 Given this order, we take no action on the parties' stipulation to stay the briefing schedule.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 19474 c(tig° 2 

# MAVIEMB11.1111111.11111cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Lansford W. Levitt, Settlement Judge Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas The Wright Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A 

### e
Exhibit
      10.23

    


    


    PROMISSORY
      NOTE

    


    
      	
              $297,830.00

            	
              December
                31, 2005

            


    

    


    


    For
      value
      received, Trinity3 Corporation promises to pay Steven
      D. Hargreaves
      or order
***two-hundred-ninety-seven-thousand-eight-hundred-thirty
      and 00/100***
      dollars,
      in lawful money of the United States of America, payable in one installment,
      together with -0- interest per annum. The payment is to be upon demand. If
      the
      said installment is not so paid, the whole of said principal sum and interest
      is
      to become immediately due and collectible at the option of the holder of this
      note. And in case suit action is instituted to collect this note or any portion
      thereof, the Company promises to pay such additional sum as the Court may
      adjudge reasonable as attorney’s fees in said suit of action. This note
      supersedes all other notes.

    


    Due:
      on
      demand

    


    At:
      Orange County, CA

    Dated:
      December 31, 2005

     

    
      	 	 	/s/
              Steven D.
              Hargreaves
	 	
              
Steven
              D. Hargreaves
	 	
              President,
                CFO and
                Director

              Trinity3
                Corporation

            


    

     

    
       

      
        	 	 	/s/
                Shannon T.
                Squyres
	 	
                
Shannon
                T. Squyres
	 	
                CEO
                  and Director

                Trinity3
                  Corporation

              


      

       

       

      
        	 	 	/s/
                Jeffrey S.
                Willmann
	 	
                
Jeffrey
                S. Willmann
	 	
                Director

                Trinity3
                  Corporation
#### Aurea Colon, Respondent, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 237]

*407Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered September 15, 2016, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that she suffered injuries when the elevator in a building owned by defendant fell from the 20th to the 11th floor. While defendant demonstrated a lack of actual or constructive notice of an elevator defect that would cause such a malfunction *(see Meza v 509 Owners LLC,*82 AD3d 426, 427 [1st Dept 2011]), it is not entitled to dismissal of the action because plaintiff can rely on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to prove negligence *(see Ezzard v One E. Riv. Place Realty Co., LLC,*129 AD3d 159, 162-163 [1st Dept 2015]; *Stewart v World El. Co., Inc.,*84 AD3d 491 [1st Dept 2011]).

Plaintiff submitted evidence to support each of the elements of res ipsa loquitur, namely “(1) that the occurrence would not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence, (2) that the injury was caused by an agent or instrumentality within the exclusive control of defendant, and (3) that no act or negligence on the plaintiff’s part contributed to the happening of the event” *(Miller v Schindler El. Corp.,*308 AD2d 312, 313 [1st Dept 2003]; *see also Rodriguez v Serge Els. Co.,*99 NY2d 587 [2003]). The testimony of plaintiff, together with that of a witness who was in the elevator with her when the elevator allegedly dropped, is sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether the elevator did in fact drop suddenly *(see Stewart v World El. Co., Inc.,*84 AD3d 491 [1st Dept 2011]). A free-fall or sudden drop of an elevator does not ordinarily happen in the absence of negligence *(id.).*We reject, as we have previously, defendant’s argument that it lacked exclusive control of the elevator because a passenger in the elevator activated the emergency stop button and jumped to try to stop the free fall once the elevator suddenly dropped *(see Miller*at 314). Although it is not necessary to consider the affidavit of plaintiff’s expert witness, we note that plaintiff’s testimony is also supported by the opinion of her expert, who explained how the accident could have occurred as plaintiff described. The expert affidavit is properly part of the appellate record since it was submitted by defendant and expressly incorporated by plaintiff into her opposition papers.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3122-3123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, January 26, 1998.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

Supplementary Information: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded

[[Page 3123]]

announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled 
for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at <a href="http://
www.bog.frb.fed.us">http://
www.bog.frb.fed.us</a> for an electronic announcement that not only lists 
applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about 
the meeting.

    Dated: January 16, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-1547 Filed 1-16-98; 3:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### In the Matter of Brandi Simmons, Petitioner, v Judith Lieb et al., Respondents.

[64 NYS3d 534]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
# Team Hill Frontlines: Jennifer Child

/ Published June 16, 2020

*Editor's Note: The “Team Hill Frontlines" series is a recurring feature that puts the spotlight on some of the civilian and military Airmen on the "frontlines" supporting our mission, people and families during the COVID-19 crisis.*Jennifer Child works for the Defense Logistics Agency as a material handler in the Storage and Distribution Division, where she supports the F-16 and A-10 weapon systems, as well as the C-130 cargo plane. Her responsibilities are receiving and in-checking, sorting, fulfilling material requisition orders and delivering parts to the various maintenance shops within her buildings. She is from Las Vegas, Nevada, and her hobbies include camping, four wheeling, crafts and hanging out with friends and family.Jennifer’s experience working on the COVID-19 frontlines:"I have taken extreme caution in keeping extra good housekeeping in my area. I have been cleaning and sanitizing everything when first coming in for the day, when others come into my area, as well as before I leave for the day. I wear a face mask when six feet social distancing cannot be maintained, and limit interactions by communicating mostly through email, IM, and phone calls whenever possible.Jennifer, Team Hill thanks you for your service! We appreciate you!*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Hill Air Force Base website.*
No. 09-9863.

#### Paul Eugene Robinson, Petitioner v. California.

562 U.S. 842, 131 S. Ct. 72,

178 L. Ed. 2d 49,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5874.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.

*50Same case below, 47 Cal. 4th 1104, 104 Cal. Rptr. 3d 727, 224 P.3d 55.
164 A.3d 400

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DONALD BOYD, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 16, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
2017-0313.

#### State v. Armengau.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-355, 2017-Ohio-197.
#### Tullytown Borough v. Armstrong.

09/06/2016

121 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 129 A.3d 619
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darrell B. Lee, Chief Financial Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MOCON, Inc.

 

 

Date:  May 13, 2011

 
| /s/   Darrell B. Lee      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Darrell   B. Lee          |
| Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
No. 12-319.

#### Jenkins *v.*Bryant et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,307
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      114
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          4,934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,281
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,024)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,789
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,073
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    514
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                514
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       514
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16


</TABLE>
(4910-13-PI



### ~" 

# "-:J~-0 if.ifii:i:-

# r 

# -- C-~
(DOl), AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofT ransporLalion and Model MYSTERE-F ALCON SOand MYSTERE-F ALCON 900 Airplanes, and FALCON 900EX Airplan•• ACTION: Final ruh:. 2Q.ES. and 20-F5 AiIplanes; Model FALCON 2000 and FALCON 2000EX Airplanes;



### ~" SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe producls list above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAn FANJET FALCON. FAN JET FALCON SERIES C. D. E, F. and GAI",lanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON 200 Allplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON 2O-CS.20-DS,

originated by an aviation authority ofanother- country to identify and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT AVlAiTION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes; KIN 2UO-AA64 (Docket No. FAA-2009-0864; DInctoratc Ideudner 2008-NM-202-AD; Amendmen 

## 1054'-1 

# ;1"-05 39-**"*; AD201~*"-**1 Federal AviatioD AdmInistration DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 14

## em Part 39



# ~.,- During maintenance onone aircraft. 

### itwas discovered that the overpressure capsules were broken onboth pressurization valves. Failure ••• ,. ofthepressurization control regulating valve (overpressure capsule) will affect the aircraft's overpressure protection· •.•. 

# • • • 

## • • 

## • • FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6-8!i1) OfFICIAL FILE coP'" ~ U_S,GO\IEANPoEHT PR<NTrNGOfF'CE·-'1I9'I -~"

### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSpbRTATION

ROIJTIN(;W"IlOI.



### Federal Aviation Administration


## 8c"A £6- AVlOns 

### Marcel Dassault-Breguet (A:rvm/BA)) 

### Model Falcon 10

### Airplanes; Model Fan. 

# TLC;'G/J Airworthiness Directives; DassauJt-Aviation (Type Certificate Previously Held by 

## iIG-T.R. INITIAI">'SlG 

### 14CFR Part 39 

# 'nz--.l..',...y Iwr~ 

### IDocket No. FAA-2009-0864; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-202-AD; Amendmel O~'NCi·~.~{ 0 [(0-1< 

# ,8 IN ~I.s·j; 

# .! RIN 2120-AA64

DATc. 

### Falcon Airplanes; Model Mystere-Falcon 200 Airplanes; Model Mystere-Falcon lO-C5 /-L (-1-CJ!O ROUTING SYM1«JL lO-DS, 

### 20-E5, and 20-F5 Ailvlanes; Model Falcon 2000 and Falcon 2000EX Airplanes LjIV.f"\ - 

# -qand Model Mystere-Falcoll 50 and 900, and Falcon 900EX Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation AdministratJOll (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). 

### ACTION: Final rule. INlTIALS"'G 

### (...~ IMn: 

### J

# 103/(•
INITIALSi51G SUMJ\1ARY: 

### We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products lis( Xf','NG'YMBOL 

# -'1tJ'''' - I

### 0 

# I above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) 'rNLT[A'_"'S1G 

### originated by all aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAT 

### describes the unsafe condition as: During maintenance on one aircraft, itwas discovered that the overpressure capsules were broken on both pressurization valves. Failure oftlle pressunzation control regulating valve (overpressure capsule) will affect the aircraft's overPressure protection. 

## * '"* * 

## * 

# , * 

# , ,