alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Land and Maritime Commander recognizes Ohio Army National Guard’s COVID-19 vaccination contributions

/ Published July 12, 2021
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Adm. Kristen Fabry recognized 11 Ohio Army National Guard members for their support to the Defense Supply Center Columbus’ recently concluded vaccination effort during a June 29 appreciation event. The OHARNG also provided the medical facility and staff required to administer the vaccine. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and DLA partnered in the effort.

Volunteers from DLA and DSCC tenant organization workforces assisted with some of the administrative functions needed to support the vaccination effort.

The group volunteered their services after DLA leadership reached out for assistance to help address emerging challenges with providing additional COVID-19 vaccination opportunities for their workforce. While assisting DSCC members of the group were also traveling around Ohio to deliver vaccinations to their other units, sometimes under austere conditions.

As public vaccine demand increased, DSCC associates were confronted with the challenging task of navigating available public vaccination options for those deciding to receive them. The DSCC vaccination site opened March 30, 2021 and completed its final day of operations May 25. Moderna and Pfizer vaccinations were held weekly in the Building 11 auditorium, ultimately vaccinating 1,148 members of the workforce. Fabry commended them for lending their professionalism and expertise to help meet the needs of the entire DSCC workforce.

Fabry joked with the guard members during the event that she couldn’t give them extra days off or pay raises, but she did want to present each of them with commander’s coins as a personal acknowledgement of her appreciation.

Fabry shared some of the internal discussions that led to how DLA and DSCC reached the decision to solicit support. “We really want to thank you for saying yes to our overture for assistance – you certainly had your hands full taking care of your own folks during this pandemic,” Fabry said.

Fabry continued to praise the volunteers for going above and beyond to make sure the DSCC military and civilian workforces were inoculated. She said that workforce’s mission is critical and everyone on the installation has a huge role in supporting our nation’s warfighter.

After the final coin presentation, Fabry mingled with team members while exchanging more personal and professional information about families and assignments before gathering for the group photo.

She bragged on the Building 20 cafeteria and extended an open invitation to drop by and sample the fare, referring to it as some of the best on DSCC.
No. 09-1549.

#### Amr Mohsen, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 840, 131 S. Ct. 200,

178 L. Ed. 2d 45,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5926.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 587 F.3d 1028.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Genesis
Worldwide Inc. and subsidiaries condensed financial statements, September
30, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,446
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,103
<INVENTORY>                                     23,093
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,566
<PP&E>                                          51,957
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,099
<BONDS>                                         15,562
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         14
<COMMON>                                         9,495
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,657
<SALES>                                         88,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,480
<CGS>                                           69,085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    49
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    944
<INCOME-TAX>                                       661
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                283
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       283
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
2017-1344.

#### Brewer v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections.

In Mandamus. On motion for leave to file motion for judgment on the pleadings instanter. Motion granted. Relator may file a response within ten days. On request for court to dismiss answer of respondent. Request denied. On relator’s motion for leave to amend the caption of the complaint. Motion granted.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
**Exhibit 32**

 

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I,the Corporate Trustee of Mesabi Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Mesabi Trust on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended July 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of MesabiTrust.

 

 
| /s/  Kenneth R. Ring                      |   | September 3,  2010 |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| Kenneth  R. Ring *                        |   |                    |
| Vice  President                           |   |                    |
| Deutsche  Bank National Trust Company     |   |                    |
| For  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas |   |                    |

 

----

*There are no principal executive officers or principal financial officers ofthe registrant.

 

1

----
|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                             
|                                                                                                          
|Price of Jacksonville, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                          
|Price of Jacksonville, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                          

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov   | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | W   |     |     |       | W  
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 10.79 |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Edward L. Berman et al., Appellants, v Holland & Knight, LLP, Respondent.

[66 NYS3d 458]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered June 17, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motion as to the first cause of action (actual fraud), and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court properly dismissed the second cause of action (constructive fraud) as time-barred. “[T]he two-year discovery provision [of CPLR 213 (8)] . . . does not apply to constructive fraud” (Monaco v *New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*213 AD2d 167, 168 [1st Dept 1995], *lv dismissed in part and denied in part*86 NY2d 882 [1995]). The alleged fraud occurred, at the latest, on January 22, 2004, but plaintiffs did not sue until July 13, 2015.

*430The two-year discovery provision *does*apply to actual fraud (first cause of action). “[T]he issue of when a plaintiff, acting with reasonable diligence, could have discovered an alleged fraud . . . involves a mixed question of law and fact, and, where it does not conclusively appear that a plaintiff had knowledge of facts from which the alleged fraud might be reasonably inferred, the cause of action should not be disposed of summarily on statute of limitations grounds. Instead, the question is one for the trier-of-fact” *(Saphir Intl., SA v UBS PaineWebber Inc.,*25 AD3d 315, 315-316 [1st Dept 2006] [internal quotation marks omitted]). One cannot say, as a matter of law, that the Internal Revenue Service’s July 2007 deficiency notice, which mentioned only nonparty Derivium, placed plaintiffs on inquiry notice of defendant’s alleged fraud *(see id.*at 316). Plaintiffs plausibly allege that, until defendant produced its file on January 8, 2015, in response to a motion to compel in Tax Court, they had no inkling of its purported fraud *(see CSAM Capital, Inc. v Lauder,*67 AD3d 149, 157 [1st Dept 2009]). Unlike the subprime crisis in *Aozora Bank, Ltd. v Deutsche Bank Sec. Inc.*(137 AD3d 685 [1st Dept 2016] [cited by defendant]), Derivium’s fraud was not common knowledge.

It is true that plaintiffs sued Derivium’s clearing broker-dealers in March 2010 *(see Berman v Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc.,*2011 WL 1002683, 2011 US Dist LEXIS 27867 [SD NY, Mar. 14, 2011, No. 10 Civ 5866 (PKC)], *affd*455 Fed Appx 92 [2d Cir 2012]). However, plaintiffs would have had far more reason to suspect Derivium’s brokers than their own attorneys. Plaintiffs were entitled to place “ultimate trust and confidence” in defendant, who represented them *(Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP,*129 AD3d 59, 72 [1st Dept 2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the actual fraud claim is not a malpractice claim in disguise *{see id.*at 68-69).

The complaint adequately alleges scienter *(see Houbigant, Inc. v Deloitte & Touche,*303 AD2d 92, 98 [1st Dept 2003]).

Concur—-Richter, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Andrias, Kern and Singh, JJ.
No. 10-5586.

#### Frank C. Johnson, Jr., Petitioner v. John H. Wilbur, et al.

562 U.S. 807, 131 S. Ct. 323,

178 L. Ed. 2d 9,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7833.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 375 Fed. Appx. 960.
|                                  |   | State or Other |   |       |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|------------|--------|
|                                  |   | Jurisdiction of     |   | Percentage |   |
|                                  |   | Incorporation            |   | Ownership  |   |
| Parent                                |   |                     |   |       |   |
|                                  |   |                     |   |       |   |
| First      South Bancorp, Inc.        |   | Virginia                 |   |       |   |
|                                  |   |                     |   |       |   |
| Subsidiary                            |   |                     |   |       |   |
|                                  |   |                     |   |       |   |
| First      South Bank                 |   | North      Carolina      |   |       | 100    | % |
|                                  |   |                     |   |       |   |   |
| First      South Preferred Trust I    |   | Delaware                 |   |       | 100    | % |
|                                  |   |                     |   |       |   |   |
| Subsidiaries of First South      Bank |   |                     |   |       |   |   |
|                                  |   |                     |   |       |   |   |
| First      South Investments, Inc.    |   | North      Carolina      |   |       | 100    | % |
|                                  |   |                     |   |       |   |   |
| First      South Leasing, LLC         |   | North      Carolina      |   |       | 100    | % |

----
#### Feister v. W.C.A.B. (Mellinger Transp., Inc.); Mellinger Transp., Inc., In re

11/16/2015

434, 475 MAL (2015)

Denied
# DLA Energy honors Women’s History Month

/ Published April 19, 2022
FORT BELVOIR, Va. , 
Recognizing the many contributions made by women, Defense Logistics Agency Energy acquisition workforce virtually hosted the 2nd annual Acquisition Workforce Women’s History Month Program March 28.

This year’s theme was “women providing healing, promoting hope.”

“There are so many notable names, in so many sectors, that come to mind when thinking about the achievements as well as the struggles of women in our nation,” said DLA Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Jimmy Canlas in his opening remarks. “But lesser-known people who have been giants in the community and workforce deserve recognition and remembrance.” 

Over 160 DLA employees participated in the ZoomGov Webinar event. 

The keynote speaker was Fox DC News Anchor Tisha Lewis. Lewis described how women are often silent workers and make the mistake of thinking that others know what they are doing. Lewis advised the audience to “speak up.” 

Canlas said that a cross-section of some of DLA Energy’s female minds and brightest talents were assembled as part of the program to share their stories and tell us all how they manage work, home, and self-health.

Gabby Earhardt, the Supplier Operations director, and DLA Energy’s most senior woman, encouraged the acquisition workforce “to continue the fight for general inequality because it doesn’t magically disappear.” She challenged the group to “take deliberate action and demand change if we expect things to be different.”

“All of us, men and women, must join in if we are to attain equal opportunities,” Earhardt said. 

The acquisition workforce event organizer Ditu Kasuyi described the event as “unstoppable.”

“As an Energy team, we are truly unstoppable when we put all our unique talents and skills together,” Kasuyi said in an email to the event’s participants. “I am excited that we were able to come together to reflect on the courage of women from past generations, celebrate our current women leaders and challenge each other to keep working towards a workforce that provides equal opportunity for every member of the team.”  

DLA Energy routinely recognizes monthly observances through employee spotlights, webinars, virtual meetings, and newsletters.  Read about the two DLA Energy employees who were honored this year during Women’s History Month for their accomplishments: Aybike Arslan and Jill Chouinard.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONSREQUIRED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350,I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Pierre Foods, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 2, 2007 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
| /S/ NORBERT E. WOODHAMS |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Norbert E. Woodhams     |   |   |
| July 17, 2007           |   |   |

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350,I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Pierre Foods, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarter ended June 2, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /S/ JOSEPH W. MEYERS |   |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------|
| Joseph W. Meyers     |   |   |
| July 17, 2007        |   |   |

 

 

34

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lloyd McFadden, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 290]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Shari R. Michels, J.), rendered May 28, 2015, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that his plea was coerced by a remark made by the court during the plea proceeding is concededly unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made. The remark at issue was essentially an accurate, noncoercive statement that if defendant did not go through with the contemplated plea to sexual abuse under a superior court information, the People were free to obtain an indictment charging a crime carrying a potential sentence of 25 years *(see e.g. People v Tabares,*52 AD3d 437 [1st Dept 2008], *lv denied*11 NY3d 835 [2008]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
No. 09-11266.

#### James Arthur Battle, Petitioner v. Debra Holly, et al.

562 U.S. 871, 131 S. Ct. 170,

178 L. Ed. 2d 101,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6962.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 824.
No. 09-11506.

#### Sergio Perez-Ochoa, aka Daniel Perez-Soto, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 884, 131 S. Ct. 211,

178 L. Ed. 2d 127,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6819.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 960.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP92-236-014]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of 
Reconciliation Filing

June 3, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 29, 1998, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston) filed a corrected Rate Schedule IT-1 
Revenue Crediting Reconciliation Filing and Nomination Variance Charge 
Credits Report. Upon review of its original April 24, 1988 filing, 
Williston discovered errors on the following sheets: Appendix B, 
Schedule 1, Page 1 of 3; Appendix B, Schedule 1, Page 2 of 3; Appendix 
B, Schedule 3, Pages 1 through 7 of 7, Appendix C, Schedule 1, Page 1 
of 3; Appendix C, Schedule 1, Page 2 of 3; and, Appendix C, Schedule 3, 
Pages 1 and 2 Page 2 of the Transmittal Letter.
    Williston requests that the Commission replace the Transmittal 
Letter and the above-listed filed on April 24, 1998, with the enclosed 
Transmittal Letter and the following sheets: Appendix B, Schedule 1, 
Page 1 of 3; Appendix B, Schedule 1, Page 2 of 3; Appendix B, Schedule 
3, Pages 1 through 6 of 6; Appendix C, Schedule 1, Page 1 of 3; 
Appendix C, Schedule 1, Page 2 of 3; and Appendix C, Schedule, 3, Pages 
1 and 2 of 2.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before June 10, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15219 Filed 6-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M