alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Military Housing Demolition underway at Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna
 
  By Lt. Col. Ed Shank, DLA Distribution Public Affairs
  The world was a much different place when military housing was constructed at the New Cumberland Army Depot in the 1950s. Conserving material goods throughout World War II, most Americans (and military families in particular) were accustomed to smaller houses  built with materials much less efficient than those used in modern construction. By the end of the 20th century the rising costs of maintaining the 140 housing units – coupled with the declining occupancy rate of military families – drove the government’s decision to close down base housing and demolish most of the structures. “Although the homes were newly renovated on the inside,” said Robert Montefour, site director for DLA Installation Management – Susquehanna, “not much was done on the outside for aesthetics. New families coming in would pause when looking at the outside 1950s-era looks.” By 2017, the occupancy rate of the homes had dropped to less than 33 percent with military families choosing to use their Base Allowance for Housing (or BAH, amounting to $1,440 to $2,600 per month based on rank) to buy or rent homes in the local area. “One of the most commonly noted benefits from families was the flexibility of selecting the schools their children would attend,” said Montefour. “There are endless home styles, neighborhoods and numerous other amenities available around the Pennsylvania state capitol area of Harrisburg.” After lengthy discussions with U.S. Army and Department of Defense personnel, in 2016 the decision was made to permanently close base housing at New Cumberland by Oct. 31, 2018. Families that occupied the units were either moved at the government’s expense or finished their tour and sent to another base within that timeframe. “We were faced with the choice of either putting substantial funds into the facility to modernize (along with a VERY strong family recruitment effort) or to divest of the mission,” said Montefour. “In the interest of being good stewards of both tax dollars and our military families, DoD chose to close the housing.” Once houses were no longer occupied, demolition of the structures began shortly thereafter. By early 2020, 120 of the original 140 units are expected to be leveled, eliminating the government’s $1 million yearly expense. According to Montefour, the remaining structures are planned to be repurposed as office space to support various military missions including the Family Advocacy Program, military recruitment, conference rooms and modern telework spaces.
Commentary: Employee Assistance Program is here to help
 By Drew Henderson
  These are strange times we find ourselves in. As the world grapples with coronavirus, it’s an especially stressful time for all and many of us are asking questions about what’s next. The Employee Assistance Program is a structured approach for helping employees and their families identify and resolve personal problems and concerns that may affect job performance.




EAP Sign Post
        EAP Program
            The Employee Assistance Program is a structured approach for helping employees and their families identify and resolve personal problems and concerns that may affect job performance.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Kristin Molinaro
                    
                    VIRIN: 200327-D-PB358-001I’ve had several people ask me, “Is it time to panic?” My answer is “NO!!” Panic involves action driven by emotion (primarily fear) and that is never a good thing.  It is critically important that we stay calm and evaluate what actions are the best in this emotional time. When things are extremely stressful, we, as humans, have a tendency to turn legitimate concern into illegitimate worry.  It’s important to understand the difference.  We ought to be concerned because this virus is real – a real pandemic that is affecting people over a large part of the world.  We ought to be concerned about social distancing; we ought to be concerned about our friends and loved ones; where we go, what we touch, washing our hands – responsible concern. Worry, on the other hand, is when the situation is controlling you and you have lost all control over the situation and how you respond to the situation.  Worry is concern gone haywire!  It tells you that you can’t sleep – that your heart should pound – that you should sweat.  Don’t go there!  Ask yourself “What can I do to regain control?  How can I reach out to my friends and my family?” Think about those questions.  Remember what worked for you in past challenging times.  Write some ideas down.  If you struggle with finding answers, don’t be afraid to ask someone for help.  Ask friends or family.  Ask a pastor or priest.  Ask your Employee Assistance Program representative.  But remember not to panic. Your EAP is available at 614-692-2000 or drew.henderson@dla.mil. (Writer’s Note: Part of this blog was inspired by an excellent message from Pastor Tony Evans.)
EX-10.3

                                            December 31, 2000


Tilden Associates, Inc.
1325 Franklin Avenue, Suite 165
Garden City, New York 11530

To Whom It May Concern:

               This is to memorialize that the undersigned, an employee of
Tilden Associates, Inc., as for the year 2000 approved, and accordingly has been
paid a reduced amount of compensation by reason of the financial condition of
the corporation. As such, I have deferred compensation in the sum of $34,952.47
for the year.

               It has been specifically agreed that when and if the corporation
shall have sufficient earnings and cash flow, in the opinion of management, said
deferred amount shall be repaid to me. Management shall determine priorities in
the use of available funds and as an employee there decision shall be binding on
me with out recourse.

               Payment may be made in installments if need be and I waive the
accrual or payment of interest on the deferred amount.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            ROBERT BASKIND

THE FOREGOING IS AGREED UPON:

TILDEN ASSOCIATES, INC.


By:
   -----------------------------------------

                                       1
#### Citibank v. Slagter

DA 16-0571

05/02/17

2017 MT 103N

Affirmed

Dist. 21 (Ravalli)
# The Preservation, Packaging, Packing and Marking team of DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas has earned the Frances L. Scranton Packaging Achievement Award 

/ Published Sept. 30, 2020
NEW CUMEBRLAND, Pa., 
The Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas Preservation, Packaging, Packing and Marking team was awarded the DLA Frances L. Scranton Packaging Achievement Award.

Through their dedication, attention to detail, and safety driven methods the team processed more than 67,000 projects to protect aviation assets valued at over $3.5 billion. Even as the size and weight of some of the materials required material handling equipment, all the projects were handled without incident.

In addition to packaging materials, the team de-packaged more than 16,000 assets valued at more than $1.2 billion. All completed incident free.

Working in conjunction with the Corpus Christi Army Depot the PPP&M team conducted new initiatives for the preservation and de-packing of rotary wing components at the point of production. While this effort required extensive training of team members in use of proper equipment and techniques, it also allowed CCAD workers to shift their efforts and focus towards returning assets from repairable condition to serviceable condition. The T-700 engine line at CCAD saw time reduction of 21 days after leveraging the core competency of DDCT’s PPP&M team.

As a result of their efforts warfighter readiness was increased and program costs were reduced.

The PPP&M team of DDCT continued their point of production efforts with CCAD by packaging all rotary wing main and tail blades to avoid the movement of bare items. The team would handle over 4,500 items and ensure these assets valued at more than $719 million were safely protected and handled without incident. It also saved an estimated 500 hours in labor.

Taking a proactive step towards ensuring warfighter support the PPP&M team at DDCT aggressively expanded their inventory of service packaging materials. This ensured the safe and timely delivery of assets to customers and reduced the overall discrepancy reports significantly. Their initiative to aggressively address packaging materials lead to the creation of custom in house built reusable materials that saved tax payers over $168,000.

The PPP&M team of DDCT demonstrated outstanding initiative, strong dedication to supporting the warfighter, and created outstanding customer relationships. Their efforts in earning this award are a great credit upon themselves and reflect highly on DLA.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14986]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,637B]


Universal-Rundle Corporation, Corporate Headquarters, New Castle, 
PA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on 
April 28, 1998, applicable to workers of Universal-Rundle Corporation 
located in New Castle, Pennsylvania. The notice will be published soon 
in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Review of the 
certification shows that the Department incorrectly identified the 
worker certification to read ``all workers of Universal-Rundel, New 
Castle, Pennsylvania.'' The company reports that worker separations 
occurred at ``Corporate Headquarters'', New Castle, Pennsylvania.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification 
determination to limit the certification coverage to the corporate 
headquarters, in New Castle, Pennsylvania. The workers are engaged in 
employment related to china sanitary fixtures (sinks and toilets).
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Universal-Rundle Corporation who were affected by increased 
imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33,637 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Universal-Rundle Corporation, Corporate 
Headquarters, New Castle, Pennsylvania (TA-W-33,637B) who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 20, 
1996 through October 31, 1999, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 15th day of May 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-14986 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### In the Matter of Natayya P., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 396]

— In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Richmond County (Porzio, J.), dated March 13, 2003, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated February 6, 2003, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, adjudged her to be a juvenile delinquent and placed her on probation for a period of 18 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated February 6, 2003.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see Matter of Frank C.,*283 AD2d 643, 643-644 [2001]; *cf. People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the determination made in the fact-finding order. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the finder of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(cf. People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(cf.*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the Family Court’s findings were not against the weight of the evidence *(see Matter of Andrew Michael S.,*100 AD2d 851 [1984]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
2017-0137.

#### State v. Xu.

Delaware App. No. 15 CAA 11 0094, 2016-Ohio-8238.
#### Herman v. Russo51

03/09/2016

618 MAL (2015)

51

. Justice EAKIN and WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1139
# DLA Distribution Acting Director Independence Day Message

/ Published July 3, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Teammates,

From 1776 until the present day, July 4th, the birth of American Independence has traditionally been celebrated as with events ranging from parades, concerts and fireworks to more casual family gatherings and barbecues. In light of the current COVID Crisis however, as we approach this 4th of July, it is important not to misplace our enthusiasm nor forget the risks associated with the long weekend.

I ask that you remain vigilant as we continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic. As worldwide cases reach over 10 million, and the United States reports over 2.5 million cases, I want to remind you all that we haven’t seen the end of this coronavirus. Please take care of yourself and your families. When you’re out in public, social distance to the greatest extent possible, wear a face covering when required or recommended, and make it a routine to thoroughly wash your hands.

I know things are starting to open up across the country and we’ve all been cooped up. But if you choose to gather with family and friends to celebrate our Nation’s independence this weekend, please do your part to make sure we don’t see a spike in COVID-related cases over the next several weeks by reviewing the CDC guidelines for social gatherings. Because COVID-19 virus circulation varies in communities, these considerations are meant to supplement state, local, or territorial, health and safety laws, rules, and regulations. Also, remember to exercise caution with fireworks, pool safety and please don’t drink and drive.

And finally, I ask that you remember to keep the deployed Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, Airmen and their families in mind as you celebrate our freedom they continue to defend.

I am proud of you and can’t thank you enough for all you do — have a safe and healthy Independence Day weekend!
No. 09-1375.

#### Wilbanks Securities, Inc., Petitioner v. Donald R. McFarland.

562 U.S. 831, 131 S. Ct. 102,

178 L. Ed. 2d 29,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6169.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Second Division, denied.

Same case below, 231 P.3d 714.
#### Fran Lewis, Appellant, v Kenneth H. Treitel, DDS, et al., Respondents.

[66 NYS3d 135]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered October 11, 2016, which granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to the extent of dismissing the complaint as time-barred as it relates to treatment rendered by them prior to November 23, 2011, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record establishes that treatment prior to November 23, 2011, the period beyond the 2V2-year statute of limitations *(see*CPLR 214-a), consisted of isolated and discrete dental procedures, not for the condition complained of, a cyst in plaintiff’s jaw. Accordingly, the continuous treatment doctrine does not apply to the treatment of these teeth *(see Galecki v Omnicare Dental,*121 AD3d 594 [1st Dept 2014]; *Marrone v Klein,*33 AD3d 546 [1st Dept 2006]). That defendants may have negligently failed to diagnose the condition does not toll the statute, since the failure to establish a course of treatment is not, in and of itself, a course of treatment for the purposes of tolling the statute *(Nykorchuck v Henriques,*78 NY2d 255, 259 [1991]; *Trebach v Brown,*250 AD2d 449 [1st Dept 1998]). While the doctrine would apply if defendants had been treating plaintiff for the underlying symptoms of the cyst, albeit incorrectly, plaintiff failed to adduce evidence that defendants treated her for symptoms ultimately traced to her cyst *(compare Chestnut v Bobb-McKoy,*94 AD3d 659 [1st Dept 2012]).

We have considered the parties’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Kahn and Singh, JJ.
No. 09-9955.

#### Christopher Smith, Petitioner v. Pennsylvania.

562 U.S. 842, 131 S. Ct. 77,

178 L. Ed. 2d 50,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5789.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, denied.

Same case below, 604 Pa. 126, 985 A.2d 886.
# Congressman Turner visits Defense Supply Center Columbus

/ Published Aug. 23, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Adm. John Palmer, along with Defense Finance and Accounting Services - Columbus Director Pamela Franceschi hosted Rep. Michael R. Turner during an installation visit Aug. 23 at the Defense Supply Center Columbus. Turner represents the 10th Congressional District of Ohio made up of Montgomery, Greene, and Fayette Counties.

During his visit Turner was provided with an in-depth briefing explaining the financial services support that DFAS-Columbus provides to their stakeholders, and an overview of DLA Land and Maritime and DSCC operations. 

Before departing for the day, Turner was provided a tour of the installation that focused on the strategic importance of DSCC tenant organizations, their functions and their substantial contributions to the nation’s armed forces mission and readiness efforts.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11 -- COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                         FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                2000          1999          1998         1997
                                             ----------    ----------    ----------    ---------
<S>                                        <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>
BASIC & FULLY DILUTED
         Net income (loss)                   $  504,000    $  475,000    $ (113,000)   $ (602,000)

         Average shares outstanding           1,488,764     1,309,966     1,265,000     1,051,329

         Net income (loss) per share:
            Basic                            $     0.34    $     0.36    $    (0.09)   $    (0.57)
            Diluted                          $     0.34    $     0.36    $    (0.09)   $    (0.57)


</TABLE>












                                       46
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,993-01

EX P ARTE CHRISTO P HER CHAVEZ ALVAR ADO, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W-366-84445-2021- HC IN THE 366T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted o f v i olation of bond/protective order two or more times within twelve months and sentenc ed to two y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appea l his conviction. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk f

orwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends, among other things, that his g uilty plea was involuntary beca use counsel

was ineffe ctive and beca use the prosec u t o r coer ced him into pleading g uilty

. The trial court

rec ommends dismiss ing Applicant’s application for non-complianc e beca use he listed his TRN number a s the ca

use number. We disag ree . Applicant has alleg ed fac ts tha t, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Brady v. United States ,2

397 U.S. 742 (1970); Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 (1985). I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts

are neede d. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant ’s cl ai m s . I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court el ec t s t o h o l d a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make supplemental finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s plea was involuntary

. The trial court shall make specific fi n d i ng s as to whether trial counsel’s perf

ormanc e was defic ient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleg ed defic ient perf

ormanc e. The trial court sh al l also make specific finding s as to whether the prosec utor induced Applicant’s g uilty plea with improper threa ts. The t ri al co u rt may make any other finding s and conc lusions that it deems a ppropriate in response to Applica nt’s claims. The trial court shall make supplemental finding s of fac t and conclusions of law within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff

idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s , an d transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4 ). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by

the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: September

7, 2022 Do not publish