alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[LOGO] NAC

                           ISO 9001 Registered Company

April 22, 1998

Allison Engine Company
2355 South Tibbs Avenue, Speed Code P41
Indianapolis, Indiana 46241


Attention:    Mr. Mark S. McCormick

Subject:      Allison T56/501D/501K Authorized Maintenance Center Agreement

Dear Mark:

The current AMC Agreement has been extended until April 30, 1998. Section
EIGHTH: TERM in that agreement provides for three-year renewal periods at a
renewal fee of $1.00 (USD) at the time of renewal.

Please find enclosed our Check No. 114183 in the amount of $1.00 (USD) for the
next three-year period. Please forward any documentation necessary as per the
referenced section for our final signature.


Sincerely,


/s/ Leroy Johnson
Leroy Johnson

Vice President, Industrial Program

Enclosure

National Airmotive Corporation o 7200 Earhart Road, Oakland, California
94621-4504 o Tel 510.562.7426
2017-1277.

#### Martens v. Findlay.

Hancock App. No. 5-17-20. On amended motion for stay pending appeal and for expedited ruling. Motion denied.
# Daylight saving time: Fall back this Sunday

/ Published Oct. 29, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Daylight saving time ends this Sunday at 2 a.m. when most Americans rewind their clocks.Daylight saving time begins the second Sunday in March and ends the first Sunday in November, when clocks are adjusted one hour back to standard time.The United States adopted daylight saving time when the Uniform Time Act of 1966 standardized time zones and daylight saving practices across the United States. The act allowed states to pass laws exempting themselves. The only states that don’t observe daylight saving time are Hawaii and most of Arizona. It’s also not observed by these U.S. territories: American Somoa, Guam, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management fire officials use this time to remind employees to change batteries in smoke detectors and other home safety devices.The National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code requires that a working smoke detector be installed in and outside every room used for sleeping, as well as on every level of the home including the basement. Homes that use wood or natural gas for fuel should also have a least one carbon monoxide detector.
# Army, DLA officials strengthen collaboration

/ Published Nov. 25, 2019
Arlington, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency and Army leaders discussed readiness and mutual support during Army/DLA Day at the Pentagon Nov. 22.

Army Lt. Gen. Duane Gamble, the service’s deputy chief of staff for logistics, and Lisha Adams, executive deputy to the Army Materiel Command commanding general, lauded DLA’s value and “exquisite” support to the Army. 

DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams said DLA’s purpose is to support the Army and neither entity can effectively perform independent of the other. Service days are designed to address issues and set up a strategic framework for DLA to resolve problems.

Williams encouraged a candid, professional discussion among all leaders to address subjects Army officials wanted to address during the session.

Briefing topics included major weapons systems and increased material availability; how the DLA Readiness Dashboard will continue capturing Army readiness drivers; cost transparency; demand planning; suspended stock and stock positioning; DLA major subordinate command updates and improvements in soldiers’ gear such as athletic footwear and hot weather combat uniforms.

The event closed with a review of takeaways and outstanding tasks.
Exhibit 15.5

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of Elbit Systems Ltd. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-13784 and 333-139512) of our report dated January 15, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of
Microwave Networks Solutions, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and the related statement of operations and retained earnings and cash flows for each of the two years in the two year period ended December 31, 2007, which report is included in
the Annual Report of Elbit Systems Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.



|    |  |                                                      
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Hoberman, Miller, Goldstein & Lesser, CPAs, P.C.
|    |  | Hoberman, Miller, Goldstein & Lesser, CPAs, P.C.    

New York, New York

March 7, 2010
160 A.3d 705

#### US BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR GSAMP TRUST 2005-AHL2, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-AHL2, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MARCELLUS GALLIMORE, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER, AND PRUDENCE MOON AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-Q03388-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.
#### Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Respondent, v George L. Sanchez, Appellant.

[48 NYS3d 578]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J-), entered January 15, 2015, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly found the affidavit submitted in support of plaintiff’s motion sufficient for prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Contrary to defendant’s contention, it was not necessary for the affiant to possess firsthand knowledge of the mechanics of the shortfall requirement in the parties’ short sale agreement, as her affidavit was not submitted to explain the transaction. The motion court correctly found the short sale agreement unambiguous and not *483deceptive *(see Sanif Inc. v Iannotti,*119 AD2d 654 [2d Dept 1986]), and properly rejected defendant’s defenses as conclusory and unsubstantiated in finding that they failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Gische and Webber, JJ.
# September orientation introduces 50 new associates

/ Published Oct. 15, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
September 23 was the first day of the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime New Employee Orientation for 50 new employees but this orientation was different than previous months. Participants were able to log in via WebRTC and use their webcams to see presenters and fellow employees instead of logging in to watch the PowerPoint presentations. This adjustment made the two-day orientation more interactive.    

DLA Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Adm. Kristen Fabry welcomed the new employees and provided insight on DLA Land and Maritime. She also highlighted our warfighter support mission and why DLA is a great place to work.  

After Fabry answered questions from the audience the NEO continued with presentations from 19 Land and Maritime organizations. New employees were given all the information, tools and networking opportunities needed to hit the ground running in their new job, whether on base or virtually. 

DLA Land and Maritime Director of Operations Griff Warren kicked off the NEO by welcoming the group of 22 Columbus and 28 Detachment new employees. This was the largest NEO class in the past four years. Those in attendance represented management and program assistants, quality assurance specialists, general attorney, police officers, purchasing agents, just to name a few. Detachments with new employees included Aberdeen, Mechanicsburg, Norfolk, Portsmouth and Puget Sound.  

Virtual meetings continue to be the norm, not only for onboarding but for all meetings. COVID-19 has challenged DLA Land and Maritime operations and the People and Culture Office continues to contribute toward Land and Maritime successfully meeting challenges. Transitioning from the Defense Collaboration System to WebRTC for a more personal orientation is just one of the many actions taken to make a good process even better.   

Please welcome to Columbus Jessica Clark, Tamarlin Stephens, Paul Leluika, Julie Philips, John Rigney, Walter Chrysler, Gary Freed, Benjamin Maxim, Casey McNamara, Brian Miller, Chasen Neff, Tamarin Osbone, Christopher Reynolds, Nehemiah Sconiers, Mary Janine Sheaffer, Karen Sherrill, Brian Silverman, Hunter Steele, and Aaron Wellman. For the Aberdeen detachment, welcome Victor Maslak and Terrance Thrweatt. For the Mechanicsburg detachment, welcome Trevor Monn, Diane Mordecai, Michael Caldwell and Nicholas Peters. For the Norfolk shipyard, welcome Richard Cromwell, Emily Harris, Franziska Ives, Melba Jackson, Louis Jones, Devin Lasalle, Julia Smith, Shelia Thomas, Joeanna Truitt, LaKeisha Violenusellis and Felicia Weathers. For the Portsmouth shipyard, welcome James Walker and for the Puget Sound shipyard, welcome Hakeem Manning and Cheryl Eposito.

The next NEO will be virtual and held Oct. 28 - 29.  All new employees to DLA Land and Maritime are required to attend in accordance with the agency procedure and at the request of the DLA Land and Maritime commander.  

Tenants of the Defense Supply Center Columbus Installation are welcome to attend. Please contact the Program Manager Dawn Sutton for an invite.
Exhibit 32.2

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  August 28, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patrick Cefalu, CFO of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


 /s/ Patrick Cefalu
-----------------------------
Patrick Cefalu, CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)
No. 12-8799.

#### Robins *v.*United States.

C. A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied.
#### Caroline Musiaro, Appellant, v Clarkstown Medical Associates, P.C., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[768 NYS2d 665]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death based upon medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (O’Rourke, J.), entered October 15, 2002, as granted the motion of the defendants Clarkstown Medical Associates, EC., Howard Feldfogel, Lisa A. Ferrara, and John Joseph Fitzpatrick for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To prevail on a cause of action to recover damages for medical malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that a health care provider deviated from accepted medical practice and that the deviation proximately caused the injuries sued upon *(see DiMitri v Monsouri,*302 AD2d 420, 421 [2003]; *Rodney v North Shore Univ. Hosp.,*286 AD2d 382, 383 [2001]; *Holbrook v United Hosp. Med. Ctr.,*248 AD2d 358, 359 [1998]).

The theory of the plaintiff’s case is that if the plaintiff’s decedent had taken a stress test, that “would have begun the diagnostic process, which . . . would have included an angiogram and treatment by a cardiac interventionalist” which would have saved his life.

It is undisputed that two months before his death, the respondents referred the plaintiffs decedent to a cardiologist who advised him to take a stress test. The plaintiffs decedent decided that he “would like to wait.” There is no evidence in the record that the respondents did anything to delay the recommended stress test *(see Cocomello v Columbia Presbyt. Med.*
      *699
      *Ctr.,*120 AD2d 357, 358 [1986]). Indeed, the evidence indicates that the respondents urged the plaintiffs decedent to follow the advice of the cardiologist.

The undisputed facts established that the respondents were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The conclusory allegations of the plaintiffs expert and the other evidence in the record failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to how the appellants deviated from accepted medical standards *(see DiMitri v Monsouri, supra; Barich v Dobozin,*287 AD2d 426 [2001]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondents’ motion for summary judgment.

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the respondents’ remaining contention. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to El Salvador (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to El Salvador (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
## FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

DATE: December 28, 2018

CASE OF: SUZANNE HARVEY, ETC. V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY

DOCKET NO.: SC 17

- 8 5 OPINION FILED: Sept ember 20 , 2018

ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS

THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION HAS BEEN MADE IN THE ABOVE

OPINION:

On p. 2, first full paragraph, line 6, the word “insurers” was changed to “insureds.”

SIGNED: OPINION CLERK

The corrected hard copy will follow.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Annual Report of China Technology Development Group Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,Alan Li and Kang Li, theChief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of our knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, theconsolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certificationis being furnished and not deemed filed.June 28, 2007   /s/ Alan Li Alan Li  Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer     /s/ Kang Li Kang Li  Acting Chief Financial Officer and Secretary  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
*December 12, 2017*

2017-Ohio-8953.]

2001-0253.

#### State v. Bryan.

Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR393660. On appellee’s motion to set an execution date. Motion granted. Quisi Bryan’s sentence shall be carried into execution by the warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the deputy warden on Wednesday, October 26, 2022, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Share Agreement



 Exhibit 10.7 
 QUICKSILVER RESOURCES INC. 
 RESTRICTED SHARE AWARD AGREEMENT 
  

	
	 Director:                                     
                                        
           

	 Number of Restricted
Shares:                                       
         

	 Date of
Grant:                                       
                                     
 


 1. Under the terms and conditions of the Quicksilver Resources Inc. 2006 Equity Plan (the
“Plan”), a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, Quicksilver Resources Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), grants to the individual whose name is set forth above (the
“Director”) the number of restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), set forth above (the “Restricted Shares”). Terms not defined in this Agreement have the
meanings set forth in the Plan. 
 2. The Restricted Shares may not be transferred, sold, pledged, exchanged, assigned or otherwise
encumbered or disposed of by the Director, except to the Company, until the Restricted Shares become vested in accordance with the schedule set forth below. Any purported transfer, encumbrance or other disposition of the Restricted Shares before
they become vested will be null and void, and the other party to any such purported transaction will not obtain any rights to or interest in the Restricted Shares. 
 The Restricted Shares will become fully vested on the first anniversary of the Date of Grant, provided that the Director has remained a member of the Board through such first anniversary. If the Director ceases to be
a member of the Board prior to the first anniversary of the Date of Grant, the nonvested Restricted Shares will be forfeited immediately. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of a Change in Control while the Director is a member of the Board,
any nonvested Restricted Shares will automatically become 100% vested. 
 3. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Director will have all
of the rights of a stockholder with respect to the Restricted Shares, including the right to vote such shares and receive any dividends that may be paid thereon; provided, however, that any additional shares of Common Stock or other securities that
the Director may become entitled to receive pursuant to a stock dividend, stock split, combination of shares, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, separation or reorganization or any other change in the capital structure of the Company will be
subject to the same restrictions as the Restricted Shares. 
 4. The Director hereby accepts and agrees to be bound by all the terms and
conditions of the Plan and this Agreement. Any amendment to the Plan will be deemed to be an amendment to this Agreement to the extent that the Plan amendment is applicable hereto; provided, however, that no amendment will adversely affect the
rights of the Director under this Agreement without the Director’s consent. 
 ACCEPTED: 
  
  

	
	  

	 Signature of Director
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                   SUBSIDIARIES OF EURAMAX INTERNATIONAL PLC
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMPANY                                                   BENEFICIAL OWNER
--------------------------------------------------------  --------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>
 
Amerimax Holdings, Inc.                                   Euramax International plc
 
Amerimax Fabricated Products, Inc.                        Amerimax Holdings, Inc.
 
Amerimax Home Products, Inc.                              Amerimax Holdings, Inc.
 
Amerimax Building Products, Inc.                          Amerimax Holdings, Inc.
 
Amerimax Coated Products, Inc.                            Amerimax Building Products, Inc.
 
Amerimax Laminated Products, Inc.                         Amerimax Building Products, Inc.
 
Fabral Holdings, Inc.                                     Amerimax Fabricated Products, Inc.
 
Fabral, Inc.                                              Fabral Holdings, Inc.
 
Euramax European Holdings plc                             Euramax International plc
 
Euramax Europe Limited                                    Euramax European Holdings plc
 
Euramax Holdings Limited                                  Euramax Europe Limited
 
Euramax Coated Products Limited                           Euramax Holdings Limited
 
Ellbee Limited                                            Euramax Holdings Limited
 
Euramax European Holdings B.V.                            Euramax International plc
 
Euramax Netherlands B.V.                                  Euramax European Holdings B.V.
 
Euramax Europe B.V.                                       Euramax Netherlands B.V.
 
Euramax Coated Products B.V.                              Euramax Europe B.V.
 
Euramax European Holdings S.A.                            Euramax International plc/
                                                          Euramax European Holdings B.V.
 
Euramax Industries S.A.                                   Euramax European Holdings S.A.
 
Euramax Coated Products S.A.                              Euramax Industries S.A.
</TABLE>
 
                                       84