alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31462-31463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15324]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6109-6]


Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board, Meeting Date and Agenda

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will convene an open 
meeting of the Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board (ELAB) on July 
1, 1998, from 1:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. This meeting will be held at the 
Omni San Antonio Hotel, 9821 Colonnade Boulevard, San Antonio, Texas 
78230.
    The agenda will include discussion on the summary of meeting rules, 
a discussion of the proposed changes to NELAC standards, a report on 
the resolution of the GLP issue, a discussion of the proposed charter, 
membership and products of Third Party Assessors Working Group, and a 
report on EPA issues.
    The public is encouraged to attend. Time will be allotted for 
public comment. Written comments are encouraged and should be directed 
to Ms. Elizabeth Dutrow; Designated Federal Officer; USEPA; NCERQA (MC-
8724R); Washington, DC 20460. If questions arise, please contact Ms. 
Dutrow by telephone at 202/564-9061, facsimile at 202/565-2441, or e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5733222325382079323b3e2d363532233f173227363a363e3b7932273679303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9efaebeaecf1e9b0fbf2f7e4fffcfbeaf6defbeefff3fff7f2b0fbeeffb0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 31463]]


    Dated: May 29, 1998.
Thomas E. Dixon,
Acting Director, Quality Assurance Division.
[FR Doc. 98-15324 Filed 6-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# DLA Land and Maritime supports COVID-19 efforts

/ Published April 21, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
As the Department of Defense increases its support to the nation’s COVID-19 virus pandemic, organizations within DOD ranks are coordinating their efforts to press the fight against the virus’ spread. The Defense Logistics Agency’s logistics support capabilities are demonstrating a growing response capacity as the Agency provides an expanding range of assistance through its worldwide supply chain operations.

DLA Land and Maritime has purposed its Maritime supply chain to furnish vital support to recently deployed U.S. Navy ships USNS Comfort and USNS Mercy. Maritime’s operating focus is to ensure the sustained delivery of maintenance parts remains reliable and flowing during both ships’ operations. Achieving that surety demands logisticians meticulously track each ship’s high priority repair parts for availability and delivery.

Maritime has been working closely with Navy customer account service representatives supporting the activities of deployed and forward deployed surface ships and submarines. Though the ships were dispatched to opposite regions of the country to more aggressively support the nation’s COVID-19 response, DLA is scaling up its logistics support since their deployment and is sustaining an operational material availability of 98 percent for the USNS Comfort, while keeping material availability for the USNS Mercy at 97 percent.

Maintenance parts not immediately on hand must be backordered for later delivery and having fewer on backorder reflects more efficient operations. There are currently 38 parts on backorder supporting USNS Comfort operations and 10 parts on backorder status for the USNS Mercy.

DLA Land and Maritime Customer Operations Director U.S. Navy Capt. David Lockney said planning and coordination with vendors is crucial during this emergency and the elevated communication is essential to DLA meeting the nation’s evolving assistance requirements.

“Our logistics supply chains have been operating at maximum capacity during this crisis to ensure all of the Navy’s ships and submarines are prepared and fully mission capable,” said DLA Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Adm. John Palmer. “All DLA COVID-19 efforts, which include Land and Maritime, are being coordinated in an Agency-wide strategy to augment FEMA’s national COVID-19 response.” 

DLA is contributing to the COVID-19 response while still fulfilling its primary military support mission. Adapting their operations to achieve both objectives is an example of the Agency’s capabilities as a premier logistics support operation that is dedicated to both national defense and humanitarian crisis response.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14571]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33587]


City of Rochelle, Illinois; Notice of Exemption; Commencement of 
Rail Common Carrier Operations

    The City of Rochelle, IL (the City), a noncarrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to commence 
operations over 2.06 miles of track located within the limits of 
Rochelle, IL.<SUP>1</SUP> The City states that its projected revenues 
will not exceed those of a Class III railroad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The line was not further described in the notice filed by 
the City, but a map included with the filing indicates that it 
begins at a switch near the intersection of Caron Road and Creston 
Road and ends in a stub east of Gredco Drive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The effective date of the exemption was May 5, 1998 (7 days after 
the exemption was filed).<SUP>2</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Under 49 CFR 1150.32(b), a notice of exemption becomes 
effective 7 days after filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any 
time.<SUP>3</SUP> The filing of a petition to revoke will not 
automatically stay the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ By petition filed on May 1, 1998, the Rochelle Railroad 
Company requests that the Board reject and or revoke this exemption. 
That petition will be addressed in a decision to be issued by the 
Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33587, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on counsel for the City: John W. Robinson, 9616 Old Spring Road, 
Kensington, MD 20895.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: May 27, 1998.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14571 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
#### Wygant v. General Elec. Co.

12/01/2015

228-230 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 113 A.3d 310
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended May 23,
2010, (the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Diaz, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 602]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered November 22, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of 41⁄2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record *(see People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Williams, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the
accompanying annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) of NovAtel Inc., I, Jonathan Ladd,
President and Chief Executive Officer, of NovAtel Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|1. |  | such Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | the information contained in such Report fairly represents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NovAtel Inc.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 17, 2006




Jonathan W. LaddPresident and Chief Executive Officer


---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Sellers, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 378]

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Perone, J.), both rendered October *65518, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 00-01418, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 01-00276, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant argues that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to a conflict of interest. However, the record reveals that the defense counsel advised the defendant and the Supreme Court of the potential conflict, the Supreme Court conducted an inquiry on the record and ascertained that the defendant understood the potential risks of continued representation by counsel, and the defendant chose to continue such representation *(see People v Lombardo,*61 NY2d 97 [1984]; *People v Gomberg,*38 NY2d 307 [1975]; *People v Roberts,*251 AD2d 431, 432 [1998]). Ritter, J.p., Florio, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                         THE MONARCH CEMENT COMPANY
                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                SECTION 906
                                  OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Monarch Cement Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Monarch Cement Company and will be retained by The
Monarch Cement Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  August 11, 2004

                                         /S/ Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                        Walter H. Wulf, Jr.
                                        President and
                                        Chairman of the Board
496 P.2d 141

#### William G. O’CONNOR, Appellant, v. The HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY, a Washington, D. C. corporation, Appellee.

No. 1 CA-CIV 1594.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

May 2, 1972.

Langerman, Begam & Lewis, P. A., by Jack Levine, Phoenix, for appellant.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel, State Compensation Fund, by Cecil A. Edwards, Jr., Phoenix, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an employee of appellee, allegedly suffered an industrial injury while so employed, and he filed a workmen’s ■compensation claim. Becoming dissatisfied with the workmen’s compensation proceedings, he filed this lawsuit in the superior court, alleging that appellee Breached a contractual duty to abide by workmen’s compensation laws and rules, seeking $100,000 in general damages.

Appellee filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim upon' which relief could be granted. The court granted the motion, hence this appeal. On the basis of Industrial Commission of Arizona v. Parise, 13 Ariz.App. 522, 478 P.2d 137 (1970), we affirm.

NOTE: This cause was decided by the Judges of Division Two as authorized by A.R.S. § 12-120, subsec. E.
#### In the Matter of Jahsib Headley, Petitioner, v Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 459]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with smuggling, violating visiting room procedures and disobeying a direct order. The charges stemmed from a correction officer who observed petitioner in the bathroom trying to place a white ball of tissue in his rectum and, when ordered to turn the object over, flush it down the toilet. Petitioner then dropped on the ground and refused orders to stand up. Thereafter, petitioner’s cell was searched and a second misbehavior report was issued charging petitioner with possessing an altered item, possessing an item in an unauthorized area, possessing contraband, possessing flammable material and possessing an altered electrical device. At a combined tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty to all of the charges in the second misbehavior report and was found guilty of violating visiting room procedures and disobeying a direct order, but not guilty of smuggling. Petitioner’s administrative appeal was unsuccessful, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Initially, we note that any challenge to the sufficiency of the *1514evidence supporting the determination with respect to the charges in the second misbehavior report are precluded by petitioner’s pleas of guilty to each of those charges *(see Matter of Donerlson v Annucci,*147 AD3d 1142, 1142 [2017]). Turning to the first misbehavior report, the misbehavior report, supporting documentation and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Darrett v Annucci,*140 AD3d 1419, 1420 [2016]; *Matter of Matthews v Goord,*47 AD3d 1043, 1043 [2008]). Any inconsistencies in the correction officer’s testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Ashley v Annucci,*145 AD3d 1238, 1239 [2016], *lv denied*29 NY3d 905 [2017]; *Matter of Aguirre v Fischer,*111 AD3d 1219, 1220 [2013]). Furthermore, we are unpersuaded by petitioner’s assertion that the dismissal of the smuggling charge is inconsistent with a finding that petitioner violated visiting room procedures and disobeyed a direct order. Finally, we do not find the penalty imposed to be “so shocking to one’s sense of fairness as to be excessive” *(Matter o fLegeros v Annucci,*147 AD3d 1175, 1176 [2017]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including that the second misbehavior report should have been designated a tier II violation and that the Hearing Officer should have been disqualified from presiding over the hearing, were not raised at the hearing and, therefore, are unpreserved for our review.

Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29746-29747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14317]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AZ-050-98-1430-01; AZA 29964-AZA 29989]


Arizona: Notice of Reality Action; Competitive Sale of Public 
Land in Quartzsite, La Paz County, AZ

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Extension of notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following land in La Paz County, Arizona, has been found 
suitable for disposal under sections 203 and 209 of the Federal Land 
Policy and Management Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2750, 43 U.S.C. 1713). The 
extension will allow additional time to complete the sale.

Gila and Salt River Meridian, Arizona

T. 4 N., R. 19 W.,
    Sec. 22, NE\1/4\SE\1/4\, E\1/2\E\1/2\NW\1/4\SE\1/4\;
    Sec. 23, N\1/2\SW\1/4\, S\1/2\NE\1/4\SW\1/4\SW\1/4\, NW\1/
4\SW\1/4\SW\1/4\, N\1/2\SE\1/4\SW\1/4\, SW\1/4\SE\1/4\SW\1/4\;
    Sec. 29, N\1/2\NE\1/4\NE\1/4\, NW\1/4\NE\1/4\, N\1/2\NW\1/4\.

    Aggregating 315.00 acres, more or less.


[[Page 29747]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Page 67342 of Vol. 61, No. 246 of the 
Federal Register published December 20, 1996, the Yuma Field Office 
published a notice for this public land sale. This notice segregated 
the subject public land from appropriation under the public land laws, 
including the mining laws, pending disposition of the action or 270 
days from the date of publication of the notice in the Federal 
Register. An Extension of the Notice for segregation was published in 
the Federal Register on September 23, 1997 (62 FR 49701).
    Upon publication of this notice in the Federal Register, that 
segregation will be extended pending disposition of the action or for 
another 270 day period, whichever occurs first.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debbie DeBock, Realty Specialist, 
Yuman Field Office, 2555 East Gila Ridge Road, Yuma, AZ 85365, (520) 
317-3208.

    Dated: May 21, 1998.
Gail Acheson,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-14317 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-M
Vets resource event held virtually
 By Jeff Landenberger
  The Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center recently held a virtual veteran’s resource fair in observance of Veterans Day. With most workers from the Battle Creek, Michigan, landmark working from home, this year’s Veterans Day program was conducted online Nov. 10. DLA Disposition Services Director Michael Cannon gave welcoming remarks to start the program. “It’s hard not to think about veterans when you work in this giant building,” Cannon said. Cannon said during WWII and the Korean War the federal center was called Percy Jones Army Hospital, where injured servicemembers came for difficult surgeries and convalescence. He explained how, today, the building is named after three WW patients who all went on to serve in the U.S. Senate. **All the presentors including, Melissa Engle with Tribe Talk, spoke from remote loactions during the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center recently held a virtual veteran’s resource fair.




Melissa Engle looks into the camera as she talks
        Tribes Talk
            All the presentors including, Melissa Engle with Tribe Talk, spoke from remote loactions during the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center recently held a virtual veteran’s resource fair.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Dana Thornbury
                    
                    VIRIN: 201110-D-HV615-100**Cannon noted that only 7% of the U.S. population can claim the title of veteran. “The fact about veterans I am most proud of is that 64% of DLA Disposition Services -this DOD agency that supports our warfighter around the world every day – are veterans.” Cannon said. “That means I am surrounded by greatness every day.” To prepare for the event, the area Morale, Welfare and Recreation office reached out and partnered with 19 groups or organizations that presented on a wide range of topics and resources for veterans, including Project Healing Water, Honor Flights, Guardian Angels, medical service dogs and Heroes to Hives, to name a few. The event featured retired Air Force Col. Frank Walker as keynote speaker. Walker shared a message about “service after service.” He retired as the DLA Enterprise Support site director in Battle Creek and served 40 years in the Michigan Air National Guard. Walker’s remarks are available for viewing at https://youtu.be/gtV4E2whg78
#### Bovis Lend Lease (LMB), Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Arch Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 117]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered on or about July 22, 2016, which to the extent appealed from and appealable as limited by the briefs, denied third-party defendant Arch Insurance Company’s cross motion to renew its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, renewal granted and, upon renewal, Arch’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint granted, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered January 25, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the parties’ motions for summary judgment as to the second and third third-party claims for indemnification and breach of the parties’ Companion Agreement, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

The facts of this case are set forth in our decisions upon prior appeals in this matter *(Bovis Lend Lease [LMB] Inc. v Lower Manhattan Dev. Corp.,*143 AD3d 597 [1st Dept 2016]; *Bovis Lend Lease [LMB], Inc. v Lower Manhattan Dev. Corp,*108 AD3d 135 [1st Dept 2013]).

Under paragraph 4 of the parties’ Companion Agreement, Bovis was required to obtain Arch’s consent to the settlement of the claims and counterclaims asserted by and against Bovis and Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC), in order to seek indemnification from Arch. Bovis’s contractual remedy in the event of Arch’s refusal to consent to a settlement, whether or not such refusal was reasonable, was to be indemnified by Arch “for all damages suffered in excess of the result that [Bovis] would have obtained if the settlement had been accepted.” By entering, contrary to the plain terms of the Companion Agreement, into a settlement with LMDC to which Arch had refused to consent, Bovis breached the Companion Agreement and forfeited its right to the contractual remedy for Arch’s refusal to consent to a settlement acceptable to Bovis, *433whether or not Arch withheld its consent in good faith. Accordingly, Arch is entitled to summary judgment dismissing Bovis’s third-party claim against it.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Maz-zarelli, Moskowitz, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.