alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Aviation public affairs chief speaks to retired government workers

/ Published Feb. 19, 2020
RICHMOND, VA, 
Amy Clement, chief, Public Affairs Office, Command Support Directorate, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, was the featured speaker during the Midlothian Chapter 2265 of the National Federation of Retired Federal Employees monthly meeting held at the Hopewell United Methodist Fellowship Hall in Chesterfield, Virginia, Feb. 12.

Clement discussed the history of Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, as well as the current missions of its tenant activities on the installation. Several members of the chapter retired from the organization when it was under different names.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                             382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   382
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              970
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,600
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,629
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,493)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,493)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
No. 09-8375.

#### Peter J. Schultz, Petitioner v. Francis Halpin, et al.

562 U.S. 841, 131 S. Ct. 64,

178 L. Ed. 2d 48,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5767,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.

Same case below, 234 Ill. 2d 381, 334 Ill. Dec. 610, 917 N.E.2d 436.
#### In the Matter of Dominick V. Sommella, Jr., Respondent, v Mark Kimble, Appellant.

[55 NYS3d 147]

Appeals from (1) an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Orange County (Christine P. Krahulik, J.), entered April 29, 2016, and (2) an order of protection of the same court entered February 9, 2016. The order of fact-finding and disposition, after a hearing, granted the family offense petition against the appellant, and directed him to comply with the conditions specified in the order of protection for a period of one year. The order of protection directed the appellant, inter alia, to stay away from the petitioner until and including February 9, 2017.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition and the order of protection are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Initially, although the order of protection issued by the Family Court in connection with the family offense petition expired by its own terms on February 9, 2017, the appeal from the order of protection has not been rendered academic “ ‘given the totality of the enduring legal and reputational consequences of the contested order of protection’ ” *(Matter of Pierre v Dal,*142 AD3d 1021, 1022 [2016], quoting *Matter of Veronica P. v Radcliff A.,*24 NY3d 668, 673 [2015]; *see Matter of Crenshaw v Thorpe-Crenshaw,*146 AD3d 951, 951-952 [2017]; *Matter of Niyazova v Shimunov,*134 AD3d 1122, 1122 [2015]).

In this family offense proceeding, the Family Court conducted a fact-finding hearing on February 9, 2016, after which it issued the order of protection against the appellant. Thereafter, the court issued an order of fact-finding and disposition entered *1019April 29, 2016. Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the testimony proffered at the fact-finding hearing established, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that he committed the family offense of harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [3]; *see Matter of Molina v Hart,*143 AD3d 723, 723 [2016]; *Matter of Kiani v Kiani,*134 AD3d 1036, 1037 [2015]).

Accordingly, the Family Court properly issued an order of protection and granted the petition.

Chambers, J.P., Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
No. 09-11199.

#### John Tyler, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 867, 131 S. Ct. 157,

178 L. Ed. 2d 94,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6756.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.

Same case below, 975 A.2d 848.
164 A.3d 408

#### WILLIAM HALPERN, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON, IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL CHASE, IN HIS PROFESSIONAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND [JAIME] OLIVEIRA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

March 23, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.
# Cassandra Glos is awarded the Jerri L Taylor Award for Individual Outstanding Contributions

/ Published Aug. 25, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Cassandra Glos, office manager for the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Office of Strategic Plans, consistently sought out ways to learn and take on new duties, in addition to her normal position description, and implemented changes that would enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of DLA Distribution.

Due to Glos’ constant and seamless efforts at maintaining the administrative functions for Strategic Plans personnel, the team has maintained all the required training for their roles, and has never found themselves short on resources to accomplish the mission.

In addition to her normal duties, Glos voluntarily assisted the continuity of operations program manager as she completed all the certification requirements to be a Federal Emergency Management Agency Level 1 planner. Her decision to do this made her an invaluable asset in the 2019 annual update of three different continuity plans. Extending beyond her local reach she assisted all 17 distribution centers within the continental United States with updating their continuity plans.

As manager of the classified storage and communications security programs for Strategic Plans, she converted a conference room to a secure, open storage facility. From beginning to the current maintenance of the storage space, Glos has taken the lead in planning, coordination and training of all the necessary personnel. The effective reach of this initiative has allowed Strategic Plans to more efficiently and effectively conduct their work.

Glos has voluntarily stepped up to assume even more responsibility and take on training to ensure that vulnerabilities in the operational chain are mitigated. Glos’ work ethic and tireless devotion to DLA Distribution has set her apart from her peers as she has, and continues to, exemplify the warfighter first mantra of DLA.
#### Murphy v. Pennsylvania State Police 8

11/03/2015

233 WAL (2015)

8

. Reconsideration Denied December 7, 2015.

Denied
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 98N-0285]


Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of 
21 New Drug Applications and 62 Abbreviated New Drug Applications; 
Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a 
document that appeared in the Federal Register of May 12, 1998 (62 FR 
26191). The document announced the withdrawal of approval of 21 new 
drug applications (NDA's) and 62 abbreviated new drug applications 
(ANDA's). The document was published with an error in the 
identification of NDA for Pipanol Powder and Tablets (trihyphenidyl) 
held by Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This document corrects that error.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 11, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Olivia A. Pritzlaff, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research (HFD-7), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.
    In FR Doc. 98-12613, appearing on page 26191 in the Federal 
Register of Tuesday, May 12, 1998, the following correction is made:
    On page 26191, in the table, in the first column, the first entry 
``NDA 4-496'' is corrected to read ``NDA 7-796''.

    Dated: June 3, 1998.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 98-15338 Filed 6-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
159 A.3d 888

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES WHEATLEY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 1, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE00552

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
No. 09-10858.

#### Christopher Lee Outley, Petitioner v. Glenn N. James.

562 U.S. 854, 131 S. Ct. 115,

178 L. Ed. 2d 70,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6137.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 368 Fed. Appx. 851.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MinesManagement, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
| \s\  James H. Moore     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James H. Moore          |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| August 8, 2007     |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MinesManagement, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
# Former information director earns spot in DLA Hall of Fame

/ Published June 22, 2021
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
*Editor’s note: This is the last of nine stories featuring 2020 DLA Hall of Fame inductees. A video highlighting inductees’ contributions to the agency will be broadcast on DLA’s Facebook page June 23.*

Susan L. Van Meter saw many technology transformations in her 41 years of federal service. Her accomplishments, visions and skills in the field earned her a position in the 2020 Defense Logistics Agency Hall of Fame.

Beginning her career as a clerk typist in 1977, Van Meter went on to serve as DLA Land and Maritime’s information operations director, managing human resources applications and overseeing the transition from the Standard Automated Materiel Management System to the Enterprise Business System.

“Susan’s attention to detail and gift for procedural excellence made her an often sought-after commodity in DLA Information Operations,” the directorate’s deputy director, Karyn Runstrom, wrote in the nomination. “Many of the processes and procedures that she developed were adopted for use throughout the entire J6.”

Van Meter became the lead for Business Systems Modernization sustainment in 2004. All of DLA’s business lines were migrated into BSM and kept running 24/7 under her management.

In 2006, Ms. VanMeter became the director of information operations for DLA Land and Maritime, where she led laptop/desktop support, the local area network, human resources systems and printing services. She was also responsible for the major subordinate command’s first successful Continuity of Operations failover, an IT term used to describe the protection of computer systems from failure by having standby equipment take over if the main system fails.

“Susan is recognized as a great individual and professional” throughout DLA’s IT workforce, Runstrom said. “She was a great leader and example for her staff, spending countless hours personally training and mentoring employees so that they could reach their greatest potential.”

Van Meter retired in 2018.*Editor's note: View VanMeter's segment of the 2020 DLA Hall of Fame ceremony video from June 23:*
No. 09-11559.

#### Crandall Postell, Petitioner v. Bank of Central Florida, et al.

562 U.S. 888, 131 S. Ct. 221,

178 L. Ed. 2d 133,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6945,

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District, denied.

Same case below, 12 So. 3d 762.
EX-10.1






AMENDMENT NO. 3




UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD. SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN




This AMENDMENT No. 3 (the “Amendment”) dated 31 March 2006 amends the terms and conditions of
the United America Indemnity, Ltd. Share Incentive Plan dated 5 September 2003, as amended (the
“Plan”).



WHEREAS, the Directors of United America Indemnity, Ltd., an exempted company incorporated
with limited liability under the law of the Cayman Islands, desire to effect the revisions to the
Plan set forth herein effective the date hereof.



NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:



1. As defined in Section 1 of the Plan, the “Plan” shall mean the United America Indemnity,
Ltd. Share Incentive Plan.



2. The first sentence of the second paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended by
deleting the word “cancelled” and inserting in its place the phrase “forfeited to the Company.”



3. The following shall be added to the various “Performance Criteria” listed in Appendix A of
the Plan as a new subclause (xii):



“achievement of certain targets with respect to the Company’s book value, assets or
liabilities”
# DLA Audit Task Force Director Visits DLA Distribution

/ Published April 24, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Navy Rear Adm. Deborah Haven, director of the Defense Logistics Agency Audit Task Force visited DLA Distribution headquarters April 18 to emphasize how mission critical the audit efforts are to DLA in a town hall meeting themed “building connections.” 

“This is all about the readiness cycle, time and resources and support to the warfighter,” said Haven. “All eyes are on DLA; this audit process is briefed regularly at the highest levels of our government.”

Haven briefed the packed auditorium on some of the history of the audit, where the process is today and where it is going.

Haven said that in 2010 Congress mandated that the Department of Defense have all of its financial statements validated and be audit ready by the end of fiscal year 2017. In 2017 through 2018, DLA received a disclaimer of opinion for its financial statements—meaning there were issue areas that had to be addressed.

“Approximately 75 percent of the issue areas are lack of internal controls, accounting procedures, oversight and lack of documentation,” said Haven. “DLA Distribution is critical because you hold the largest inventory.”

Haven emphasized that this is a process that is meant to make the organization better and that the audit team needs everyone’s support with timely responses to help achieve a clean audit opinion.

“It’s important for us to continue to progress,” said Ms. Denise Kanelos, DLA Distribution audit readiness site lead. “If there is property that is not in a ready for issue status when the warfighter needs it, that’s a problem. It would be no different than if you went to the bank for your money and the bank lost it.”

DLA Distribution Deputy Commander, Ms. Twila C. Gonzales, SES, took the opportunity to address the hundreds of employees in the auditorium to emphasize the importance they all play in the audit process.

“What you all do in some way, shape or form connects to the audit,” said Gonzales. “Everyone is a part of the audit. Auditing improves efficiency and helps support the warfighter and that’s what we are here to do.”
,IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

ENRIQUE MAYMI, 

 

Defendant BelowAppellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Plaintiff BelowAppellee.

§ 

§ No. 40, 2017 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID 87001255DI 

§ 

§

 Submitted: March 30, 2017 

 Decided: May 1, 2017 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices. 

ORDER

 This 1st day of May 2017, upon consideration of the appellant’s opening 

brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record below, it appears to the Court 

that: 

 (1) The appellant, Enrique Maymi, filed this appeal from the Superior 

Court’s denial of his second motion for postconviction relief. The State has filed a 

motion to affirm the judgment below on the ground that it is manifest on the face 

of Maymi’s opening brief that his appeal is without merit. We agree and affirm. 

 (2) In December 1987, a Superior Court jury convicted Maymi and his 

codefendant, Carmelo Claudio, of Murder in the First Degree. The Superior Court 

sentenced Maymi to life imprisonment. This Court upheld his conviction and 
2

sentence on direct appeal.1

 In 2007, Maymi filed his first motion for 

postconviction relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61. The Superior Court 

appointed counsel to represent Maymi, and appointed counsel filed an amended 

motion for postconviction relief in March 2008. The Superior Court denied his 

motion.2 This Court affirmed on appeal.3 

 (3) Maymi filed his second Rule 61 motion in May 2016. The Superior 

Court referred Maymi’s motion to a commissioner, who issued a report on October 

3, 2016, recommending that Maymi’s motion be denied as both untimely and 

repetitive. On December 21, 2016, after conducting a de novo review, a judge of 

the Superior Court adopted the commissioner’s report and recommendation and 

denied Maymi’s motion. This appeal followed. 

 (4) After careful consideration of the opening brief and the State’s motion 

to affirm, it is clear that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of, 

and for the reasons assigned by, the Superior Court in its well-reasoned decision 

dated December 21, 2016. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that 

Maymi’s second motion for postconviction relief was untimely and repetitive and 

that Maymi had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles. Maymi’s contention 

 

1 Claudio v. State, 585 A.2d 1278 (Del. 1991). 

2

State v. Claudio, 2008 WL 853799 (Del. Super. Apr. 1, 2008). 

3 Claudio v. State, 958 A.2d 846 (Del. 2008). 
3

that he was entitled to the appointment of counsel to pursue his second motion 

under Rule 61 is simply incorrect.4

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

 Justice 

 

4 Gibbs v. State, 2015 WL 3843378 (Del. June 18, 2015).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramell Drayton, Appellant.

[61 NYS3d 477]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Miriam Best, J.), rendered July 11, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Richter, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 00-50446

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL JON HANNEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-00-CR-9-ALL-SS

January 8, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Jon Hanneman appeals from his conviction of making false statements to a firearms

dealer and unlawful receipt and possession of a firearm while subject to a restraining order against

committing family violence. Hanneman co nt ends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) violates the Second-2-

Amendment and the Commerce Clause. Section 922(g)(8) does not violate the Second Amendment,

United States v. Emerson

,

___F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Oct. 16, 2001), 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22386,

*146, nor does it violate the Commerce Clause. U nited States v. Pierson

, 139 F.3d 501, 503-04 (5th

Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED.
May 5, 2014

CAAP-13-0000972

#### State v. Hernandez

Affirmed