alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Career logistician emphasizes importance of DLA mission to joint military audience
 
  By Lt. Col. Ed Shank, USAR, Defense Logistics Agency Public Affairs
  To remain relevant and effective as the last remaining superpower it is essential for members of the U.S. military to remain as informed as possible on technology, processes and world events as they evolve. For that reason, reserve soldiers and sailors assigned to Defense Logistics Agency Distribution’s headquarters spent their January drill attending a joint training course.  According to Donnie Thompson, DLA Distribution J9 chief of deployments and training and course instructor, the importance of frequent training cannot be over emphasized.  “Every individual here either has deployed or will have the opportunity to deploy on behalf of DLA,” said Thompson to a class of more than 20 Army and Navy reservists. “The warfighter relies on logistics for food, weapons systems, fuel, medical supplies and more. As America’s combat logistics agency, DLA is responsible for making sure that soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines can focus on his or her job and not have to worry about where the supplies are coming from.”  As a retired Navy logistics specialist, Thompson has deployed both in uniform and out and is keenly aware of how unexpected issues can create havoc, requiring a logistician to react quickly using any and all resources available.  “A part can be manufactured in the United States without taking into consideration the climate differences between the U.S. and, say, Iraq or Afghanistan,” Thompson says recalling a specific issue the Army faced with mesh covers designed to filter dust and debris from radar equipment on helicopters in Iraq.  “The manual said the covers should be swapped out every 60 days. But they didn’t take into account the increased level of dust they would encounter in the desert, so maintenance was swapping the mesh every three or four days,” he said. “Before long, they ran out of filters, so soldiers started washing them by hand, but it wasn’t working and we ended up losing a couple aircraft because they didn’t have enough warning they were being fired upon.”  Eventually the problem was fixed, but the story serves as an example of how lives can be directly affected by the individuals in the class being good at their jobs.  Even holiday meals require a huge amount of planning, Thompson says, highlighting the fact that, in 2019 alone, DLA facilitated the shipping of more than 66,000 pounds of turkey, 80,000 pounds of beef, 44,000 pounds of ham and 44,000 pounds of shrimp.  “It’s almost mind-boggling if you think about it,” said Thompson. “Just imagine how far in advance you have to start planning something like that in order to get all of that food to several locations all on time. But we did it! In fact, we’ve been doing it since the Global War on Terror began more than 19 years ago. It’s what DLA does...and we’re really good at our job.”
164 A.3d 401

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RASHAUN BARKLEY, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 16, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David E. Freeman, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 344]

Appeal by the de*649fendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered April 4, 2002, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the County Court improperly resentenced him on his violation of probation because it failed to obtain an updated presentence report *(see People v Segar,*295 AD2d 628 [2002]; *People v Pierre-Paul,*289 AD2d 262 [2001]; *People v Viruet,*288 AD2d 407 [2001]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Compu-DAWN, Inc.
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE



                                                           For the Year Ended
                                                               December 31,
                                                            1997         1996
                                                        -----------   ---------

NET (LOSS)                                              $(4,436,745)  $(570,769)
                                                         ==========    ========


WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:
      Common shares outstanding                           1,556,587    1,219,700
      Assumed conversion of cheap options and warrants      713,460      459,213
                                                         ----------    ---------

                                                          2,270,047    1,678,913
                                                          =========    =========

BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE                       $(1.95)      $(.34)
                                                             ======        =====








                                 - Exhibit 11 -
TO: Docket EPA-R09-OAR-2010-1078: EPA Action on Revision to South Coast Portion 

of the California State Implementation Plan; CPV Sentinel Energy Project AB 1318 

Tracking System

FROM: Ann Lyons, Laura Yannayon

DATE: October 2, 2012

RE: Telephone Conference with South Coast Air Quality Management District 

Representatives

Participants: 

Barbara Baird, Lauren Nevitt: South Coast Air Quality Management District

Laura Yannayon, Ann Lyons: EPA Region 9

EPA requested the telephone conference. The purpose of the telephone conference was for EPA 

to ask the South Coast Air Quality Management District for additional information regarding 

some of the offset transactions in the AB 1318 Tracking System.
#### Nicola Cleasby et al., Respondents, v Suchitra S. Acharya, M.D., et al., Appellants.

[56 NYS3d 280]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered May 27, 2016, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint or, alternatively, to preclude plaintiffs’ expert opinion or to direct a *Frye*hearing on plaintiffs’ theories of causation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As an initial matter, plaintiffs’ expert affirmation does not comply with CPLR 2106 (a), because the expert failed to state that he or she is licensed to practice medicine in the State of New York. This defect should have been corrected by submission of a compliant affirmation, but the affirmation raises a triable issue of fact, and plaintiffs may correct the defect before the motion court.

Defendants established prima facie that they did not depart from good and accepted medical practice through affidavits by three medical experts opining that the post-stroke treatment of the infant plaintiff with an anticoagulant for three months and then aspirin, after his condition had apparently improved, was good and accepted medical care.

In opposition, plaintiffs raised triable issues of fact as to whether there was a departure and whether such departure caused the infant’s injuries. Plaintiffs’ expert opined that defendants departed from accepted practice by discontinuing the anticoagulation therapy and treating the infant with aspirin when the radiology scans showed a moderate- to high-grade stenosis of the cerebral artery associated with his initial stroke. The expert opined that defendants also departed from accepted practice by discontinuing the anticoagulants before confirming the infant’s lipoprotein (a) levels, which are associated with a high risk of stroke. The expert opined further that these departures were a substantial factor in causing the infant’s second stroke and consequent disabilities *(see Malone v Kim,*96 AD3d 477, 477 [1st Dept 2012]).

Contrary to defendants’ contention, plaintiffs’ expert’s opinion is not based on novel theories subject to preclusion under *Frye v United States*(293 F 1013 [DC Cir 1923]), and does not warrant a preliminary Frye-type hearing. Plaintiffs’ expert opined that defendants discontinued the anticoagula*606tion therapy prematurely, which contributed to the infant’s second stroke. Following the second stroke, anticoagulants were resumed, and the infant remained on them. In light of the record support for anticoagulation as the preferred treatment for this patient, there is nothing novel about the theory that post-stroke anticoagulation therapy was correct or was superior to aspirin in this instance *(see Marsh v Smyth, 12*AD3d 307, 311-112 [1st Dept 2004, Saxe, J., concurring]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Richter, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  August 27, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Connie Wood,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Connie Wood
------------------------------
Connie Wood, President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 09-1511.

#### Mary Catherine Reilly Fintan, Petitioner v. Kristin Morris, et al.

562 U.S. 837, 131 S. Ct. 165,

178 L. Ed. 2d 41,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 5769.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied.

Same case below, 125 Nev. 1072, 281 P.3d 1212.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


Wesley Jessen VisionCare, Inc.
Listing of Subsidiaries
December 31, 1999

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Jurisdiction of Incorporation
                                                 -----------------------------
<S>                                              <C>
Wesley Jessen Corporation                        Delaware
Wesley Jessen (Puerto Rico), Inc.                Delaware
PBH, Inc.                                        Delaware
PBH International, Inc.                          Delaware
Barnes-Hind International, Inc.                  Delaware
Wesley Jessen Argentina SA                       Argentina
Wesley Jessen Pty, LTD.                          Australia
PBH N.V.                                         Belgium
Wesley Jessen do Brazil Ltda                     Brazil
Wesley Jessen (Canada), Inc.                     Canada
Wesley Jessen (France), S.A.                     France
Wesley Jessen GmbH                               Germany
Wesley Jessen S.p.A.                             Italy
Wesley Jessen (Japan) Y.K.                       Japan
Wesley Jessen K.K.                               Japan
Wesley Jessen (Hong Kong) Ltd                    Hong Kong
W Jessen Mexico SRL                              Mexico
Wesley Jessen Nederland B.V.                     Netherlands
Wesley Jessen PTE LTD                            Singapore
Wesley Jessen S.A.                               Spain
Barnes Hind Spain, S.A.                          Spain
Wesley Jessen Limited                            (U.K.) England
WJ/PBH (Services) Limited                        (U.K.) England
PBH Diffrative Lenses Limited                    (U.K.) England
</TABLE>
# Guam exercise providing hands-on field training

/ Published June 22, 2021
NAVAL STATION GUAM, 
The main point of Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services’ two-week Contingency Operations Readiness Exercise on the Pacific Island of Guam is the maintenance and growth of expeditionary civilian and reserve servicemember skills.

                Petty Officer 1st Class Alac Williams and Petty Officer 1st Class Marci Pollard, both part of Disposal Support Unit 1 out of Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington, listen as Property Disposal Specialist Edward Forbes leads material handling equipment refresher training during a two-week Contingency Operations Readiness Exercise in Guam.                            210616-D-YU183-060                            Petty Officer 1st Class Alac Williams and Petty Officer 1st Class Marci Pollard, both part of Disposal Support Unit 1 out of Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington, listen as Property Disposal Specialist Edward Forbes leads material handling equipment refresher training during a two-week Contingency Operations Readiness Exercise in Guam.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Jeff LandenbergerVIRIN: 210616-D-YU183-060Among those skills, proper and safe operation of material handling equipment is a priority for all property disposal sites across the command. Members of the COREX team are receiving good opportunities for refresher training on that equipment in a hot, sticky, and tropical environment.  

Property Disposal Specialist Edward Forbes is supporting the exercise as the MHE license-issuing officer on-site in Guam. He assisted the COREX crew with refresher training on some of the equipment included in the prepositioned Expeditionary Site System kit.

Two exercise participants who took the equipment refresher both operate as part of Disposal Support Unit 1 out of Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington. Both Petty Officer 1st Class Alac Williams and Petty Officer 1st Class Marci Pollard said the extra instruction was worth their time.

“Refresher training is always helpful to maintain the proper knowledge and skill base to be safe out there and not be complacent,” Pollard said.

Williams added, “If I deploy or go to another site, I will have the qualifications to operate the MHEs there,” Williams said.

The training consisted of both classroom and hands-on operations of equipment.

“It’s a great pleasure to work with the sailors out here during this exercise and we are glad to give them support,” Forbes said.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MOBILE AMERICA CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        25,607,186
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       27,229,463
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         27,578,821
<EQUITIES>                                   1,472,056
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              73,341,347
<CASH>                                         956,488
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             180,230
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      (2,079,490)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             115,998,057
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             27,647,857
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         30,864,881
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              9,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       191,110
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,989,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               115,998,057
<PREMIUMS>                                   8,432,645
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          1,001,581
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              (8,091)
<OTHER-INCOME>                               1,887,655
<BENEFITS>                                   7,554,837
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   (239,260)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         3,307,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                690,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                   156,011
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            534,395
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   534,395
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              11,400,131
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          5,665,000
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            1,878,000
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           1,178,000
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             5,865,000
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             11,899,033
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      1,878,000
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Freeman, Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 809]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph Fabrizio, J.), entered on or about August 3, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level three predicate sex offender pursuant to the Sex Of*424fender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see *People v Gillotti,*23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, or were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying crime and defendant’s criminal history.

Concur— Friedman, J.R, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick, Kern and Singh, JJ.
2016-1786.

#### State v. Moore.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104082, 2016-Ohio-7226.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Port Huron, MI Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Port Huron, MI Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 2.33   | 3.15   | 3.02   | 2.45  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# DLA Troop Support honors National Native American Heritage Month

/ Published Nov. 20, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support marked National Native American Heritage Month with a guest speaker during a virtual event held 19 November in Philadelphia. 

“Events like today allow us to appreciate different perspectives, backgrounds and talents. Recognizing the importance of diversity and inclusion and appreciating other points of view, ultimately results in a stronger workplace,” said Robert Ratner, DLA Troop Support Chief of Staff.

Native American Heritage Month began as an effort to gain a day of recognition for the significant contributions the first Americans made to the U.S., according to the National American Indian Heritage Month website. The movement gained momentum in 1915 when a number of states marked day of observance. In 1986, President Ronald Reagan proclaimed the first American Indian Week, then in 1990, President George H.W. Bush designated November as National American Indian Heritage Month. 

Ratner introduced guest speaker Johnson Taylor the Piscataway Nation, who performed several traditional tribal dances. 

“This month is Native American Heritage month,” Taylor said before performing a dance that honored Native American veterans. “Last week we honored our veterans. Many songs are composed across Native American County for our warriors. Many tribes honor their warriors that went and fought for this land, this country. Many warriors paid the supreme sacrifice and never came home.”

The regalia he and several others wore while performing resemble what their tribal ancestors wore and serve the same purpose, he said.

“Today, we still have our ceremonies,” Taylor said about the traditions that are passed down to each generation. “Today, we still dance in this arena, around this big drum. These teachings we have, all the dances...we think of other people when they are sick and they’re not feeling too good.”