CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Placer County Air Pollution Control District

Rule No(s): 515 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: February 1 9, 20 15

Rule Title(s): Stationary Rail Yard Control Emission Reduction Credits

Date Submitted to ARB: 0 3 / 0 4/20 15

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): October 9, 2008

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: John Finnell Phone Number: (530) 745

- 23 24 E

- mail Address: jfinnell @placer.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

This rule provide s owners or operators of a rail yard a mechanism for quantifyin g, certifying, and banking

emission reductions from installation and use of a control device which reduces emissions from locomotive

engines in rail yards. This amendment added provisions that improved enforceability for issued credits.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMIS SIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach refere nce(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: None

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected:

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) : If ERCs are generated from this rule, emissions would decrease by at least 5% of the ERC value due to this amount going

into the Priority Reserve Bank. Additionally, NOx emissions would be decreased by an additional 10% of the NOx ERC

value due to a provision of the rule to take 10% for public health benefit.CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: NA

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: None

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): None

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): NA

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approx imate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: None

Percent in Nonattainment Area: NA %

Number of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 1 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controll ed by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : Union Pacific Railroad's J.R. Davis Rail Yard in Roseville.

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Li mits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 302 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: Emission Reduction Credits

V. OTHER REQUI REMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 303 Work Practice Standards in Section(s):

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 503 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 503CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts atta inment

Discussion: