alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MONARCH
CEMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         5305230
<SECURITIES>                                  12673132
<RECEIVABLES>                                 13036127
<ALLOWANCES>                                    524000
<INVENTORY>                                   14740057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              45802425
<PP&E>                                       104729698
<DEPRECIATION>                                76778071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                80393644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7601103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      10509660
<OTHER-SE>                                    49892526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  80393644
<SALES>                                       43577622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              43577622
<CGS>                                         35566412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 35566412
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4983105
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1800000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3183105
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3183105
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
        

</TABLE>
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Price of Portal, ND Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Price of Portal, ND Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 1.36  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.19   | 4.00   | 5.50   | 1.92   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# Virtual inspections providing “eyes on” support to the Navy fleet

/ Published Sept. 23, 2020
RICHMOND, VA, 
Months of preparation, training and planning goes into readying Navy vessels for overseas deployments. The slightest delays can alter their schedules.

Navy maintenance and readiness are responsible for maintaining and repairing these ships before deployment and Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Engineering Directorate’s Industrial Plant Equipment Services Division writes the contracts and performs quality assurance inspections to ensure the needed equipment is available for repairs.

One such piece of equipment is a pipe bending machine, capable of bending pipe up to 6 inches in diameter. Different types of fluids and gases flow throughout the ship when these pipes are installed.

The IPE Division recently awarded a contract to a Tacoma, Washington based metal fabricator to replace the pipe bending machines at the Mid-Atlantic Regional Maintenance Center in Norfolk, Virginia and the Southeast Regional Maintenance Center in Mayport, FL in early 2021 and at the Fleet Readiness Center Southwest in San Diego.

Jim Boler, an IPE quality assurance specialist supervisor, said the contract quality assurance provision requires the machines be inspected before they can be shipped to the customer.

“This is to help ensure that the machine meets the requirements of the contract and it’s much easier to correct any deficiencies at the manufacturer’s facility,” he said.

Due to travel restrictions put in place by the Department of Defense due to the coronavirus pandemic, Boler said the normal IPE process of conducting in-person inspections were not possible and contract completion was in jeopardy.

To accomplish the mission and keep the acquisition process flowing smoothly and without delay, Boler said they decided to implement a virtual inspection procedure allowing the manufacturer to submit photos, videos and reports as evidence of contract compliance. The alternative to virtual inspections was to simply stop the procurement of the pipe bending machines until travel restrictions were lifted. An option David Theriot, Industrial Plant Equipment Services Division chief, said they were not willing to accept.

Theriot said conducting virtual inspections is not a new concept for IPE. They have used video and pictures in the past when they weren’t able to travel.

While providing machine tools to the customers in a timely manner was one of the main driving forces behind the virtual inspections concept, Theriot said they didn’t want to be the reason for a delay in the process.

He said until travel restrictions are lifted, they will continue providing support to the warfighters utilizing virtual inspections.

“We have to adjust and change to meet today’s challenges,” Theriot said.
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT



Gideon Johannes van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat. P.O. Box 20
Potchefstroom South Africa 2520



US Securities and Exchange Commission

Re Anooraq Resources Corporation Form on 20F for the Fiscal
year ended December 31, 2005

I, Gideon Johannes van der Heever, Pr. Sci Nat., hereby certify
that I have read the disclosure in connection with the Boikgantsho Joint Venture
Property contained in the subject 20F and hereby consent to the reference to
myself as a named expert in the written disclosure in the Form 20F of Anooraq
Resources Corporation.

Dated this 26 day of June, 2006.

*/s/ Deon van der Heever*

|Deon van der Heever,
      Pr.Sci.Nat.
|--------------------------------------

---
#### Com. v. Olmeda

10/29/2015

221 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 390
No. 09-1067.

#### Laurie D. McFadin, dba Two Bar West, et al., Petitioners v. Lynn Gerber, dba Foxy Roxy’s, dba Eternal Perspective Handbags, et al.

562 U.S. 827, 131 S. Ct. 68,

178 L. Ed. 2d 23,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6565.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 587 F.3d 753.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 220 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 220

  To reimburse municipalities for tax liens which had been placed on 
                          forfeited property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 27 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

 Mr. Smith (for himself and Mr. Graham) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reimburse municipalities for tax liens which had been placed on 
                          forfeited property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASSET FORFEITURE.

    (a) Section 524 of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (c)(1)(H) to be subsection 
        (c)(1)(I); and
            (2) by inserting a new subsection (c)(1)(H) as follows:
                    ``(H) the payment of State and local property taxes 
                on forfeited real property that accrued between the 
                date of the violation giving rise to the forfeiture and 
                the date of the forfeiture order; and''.
    (b) The provisions of this section shall apply to all claims 
pending at the time of or commenced subsequent to the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
160 A.3d 712

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ARTAJ M. NORTHROP, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15094]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-5-32-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

June 2, 1998.
    Take notice that, on May 29, 1998, Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
(CIG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, Eighth Revised Sheet No. 11A reflecting a decrease in its 
fuel reimbursement percentage for Lost, Unaccounted-For and Other Fuel 
Gas from 0.79% to 0.70% effective July 1, 1998.
    CIG states that copies of this filing have been served on CIG's 
jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15094 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Sanford shares warfighter support strategies at International Military Helicopter Symposium
 
  By Natalie Skelton, DLA Aviation Public Affairs
  Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. David Sanford shared updates on DLA Aviation’s aircraft sustainment mission with a transatlantic audience during a United Kingdom-based International Helicopter Summit Feb. 16. The summit offers an opportunity to share and exchange ideas on sustainment with industry joint allied partners and other nations. In his virtual presentation, Sanford addressed several developments  across DLA, such as the ongoing acquisition and supply chain management modernization strategy. He said modernization efforts are key to strengthening DLA’s industry partnerships with original equipment manufacturers. “The global logistics environment is rapidly evolving and increasingly interconnected,” Sanford said. “DLA must work closely with industry partners to modernize and streamline our acquisition and end-to-end supply chains to deliver increased readiness and maintain our competitive advantage.” Sanford added that strong supplier partnerships enable DLA to continue building a diverse, resilient and agile industrial base to reduce supply chain risk “and drive the best value for our customers.” “We all are experiencing sustainment challenges with aging platforms, and even newer weapons systems,” Sanford said. Sanford discussed the agency’s strategy for improving material readiness through industry collaboration, shortening the logistics “kill chain” and the role of logistics in helping deter conflict; or, if unable, being prepared to rapidly support combat operations as well as humanitarian efforts.
No. 09-1371.

#### James B. Thompson, Petitioner v. Erik K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

562 U.S. 831, 131 S. Ct. 101,

178 L. Ed. 2d 29,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6457.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

Same case below, 334 Fed. Appx. 325.
Asia Properties, Inc.


USA:     114  W.  Magnolia  St,  Suite  400-115,  Bellingham,  WA  98225
          Telephone:  (360)  392-2841  Fax:  (604)  535-8456

Homepage:     www.asiaprop.com
              ----------------

Symbol:     ASPZ

          AGREEMENT  BETWEEN  KCSA  WORLDWIDE  AND  ASIA  PROPERTIES,  INC.


It  is  noted  that  Asia Properties, Inc. has had an outstanding bill with KCSA
since  late  1999  for  $25,  659 that has gone unpaid.  KCSA has agreed to take
58,000 shares of restricted stock in Asia Properties, Inc. in settlement of this
bill.

The  two  firms  further  agree  as  follows:

1.     That  Asia Properties, Inc. may redeem the 58,000 shares within 12 months
of  this  date  by  paying  in  cash  $25,  659  to  KCSA.
2.     That if the shares have not been redeemed by Asia Properties, Inc. within
12  months,  that  the  company  will  register  the  58,000 shares in it's next
registration  statement  and  cause  them  to  become  free  trading.



For and on the behalf of Asia Properties, Inc.     For and on the behalf of KCSA


Daniel  S.  Mckinney                         Dan  Stepanek
President                                    Managing  Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ALICIA WOODFORD, individually, and on 

behalf of others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

YAZAM INC., d/b/a EMPOWER,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 22-03665 (BAH)

Judge Beryl A. Howell

ORDER

Upon consideration of defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 20, plaintiff’s Motion to 

Certify Class, ECF No. 19, the legal memoranda in support and in opposition, and the entire record 

herein, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby 

ORDERED that defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 20, is GRANTED; it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class, ECF No. 19, is DENIED as moot; it 

is further

ORDERED that plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, ECF No. 17, is dismissed; and it is 

further 

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

Date: November 21, 2023

_______________________________ 

BERYL A. HOWELL 

United States District Judge
#### In the Matter of Nataylia C.B. and Another, Infants. Onondaga County Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent; Christopher B., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[51 NYS3d 915]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Michael L. Hanuszczak, J.), entered September 28, 2016. The order settled the record on appeal.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Matter of Nataylia C.B. (Christopher B.)*([appeal No. 1] 150 AD3d 1657 [2017]).

Present— Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Curran and Scudder, JJ.
Exhibit 12.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eytan Bar, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mer Telemanagement
Solutions Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) [Paragraph omitted
pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] (c) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006

/s/Eytan Bar*
-------------
Eytan Bar
Chief Executive Officer

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,502
<PP&E>                                          17,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,199
<BONDS>                                          6,405
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,140
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,283)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,827
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,141
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                       471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       788
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>