alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         PACIFICARE HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                                STATE OF INCORPORATION
------------------                                                ----------------------
<S>                                                               <C>
Antero Health Plans, Inc.                                         Colorado
FHP Reinsurance Limited                                           Bermuda
Harris Methodist Health Insurance Company, Inc.                   Texas
Harris Methodist Texas Health Plan, Inc. dba Harris Methodist
Health Plan                                                       Texas
Health Maintenance Life, Inc.                                     Guam
PacifiCare Behavioral Health of California, Inc.                  Delaware
PacifiCare Behavioral Health, Inc.                                Delaware
PacifiCare Credentialing, Inc.                                    California
PacifiCare Dental                                                 California
PacifiCare Dental of Colorado, Inc.                               Colorado
PacifiCare eHoldings, Inc.                                        California
PacifiCare Health Plan Administrators, Inc.                       Indiana
PacifiCare International Limited                                  Ireland
PacifiCare Life and Health Insurance Company                      Indiana
PacifiCare Life Assurance Company                                 Colorado
PacifiCare Life Insurance Company                                 Arizona
PacifiCare of Arizona, Inc.                                       Arizona
PacifiCare of California                                          California
PacifiCare of Colorado, Inc.                                      Colorado
PacifiCare of Nevada, Inc.                                        Nevada
PacifiCare of New Jersey, Inc.                                    New Jersey
PacifiCare of Ohio, Inc.                                          Ohio
PacifiCare of Oklahoma, Inc.                                      Oklahoma
PacifiCare of Oregon, Inc.                                        Oregon
PacifiCare of Texas, Inc.                                         Texas
PacifiCare of Washington, Inc.                                    Washington
PacifiCare Pharmacy Centers, Inc. dba Prescription Solutions      California
PacifiCare Ventures, Inc.                                         California
Secure Horizons USA, Inc.                                         California
SeniorCo, Inc.                                                    Delaware
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1566]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Alan T. Waterman Award Committee; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Alan T. Waterman Award Committee (#1172).
    Date and Time: Monday, February 9, 1998; 8 a.m.-3 p.m.
    Place: Room 370, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Mrs. Susan E. Fannoney, Executive Secretary, 
Room 1220, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703/306-1096.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations in the 
selection of the Alan T. Waterman Award recipient.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The nominations being reviewed include 
information of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute 
unwarranted invasions of personal privacy. These matters are exempt 
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 20, 1998.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-1566 Filed 1-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8) of PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses
pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan for Officers and Key Employees, the
1996 Non-Officer Directors Stock Option Plan of PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.,
the 1997 Premium Priced Stock Option Plan, the Amendment and Restatement of the
PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. Savings and Profit-Sharing Plan, the 2000
Employee Plan and the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and in the Registration
Statement (Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 number 333-74812) of PacifiCare Health
Systems, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated January 31, 2002
(except for Note 10, as to which the date is March 12, 2002) with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of PacifiCare Health Systems,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2001.



Irvine, California
March 15, 2002
No. 09-11367.

#### John Burton, Petitioner v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.

562 U.S. 876, 131 S. Ct. 391,

178 L. Ed. 2d 111,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6809.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
# A fond farewell: Commander celebrates time at DLA, says goodbye to Philly workforce

/ Published May 18, 2021
PHILADELPHIA, 
Army Brig. Gen. Gavin Lawrence said goodbye to the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support during a relinquishment of command ceremony in his honor May 14 in Philadelphia.

The ceremony marked Lawrence’s transition from DLA Troop Support after serving nearly two years and guiding the organization through the challenges of a pandemic while providing more than $19 billion per year in support to the warfighter and nation while improving the culture of the team.

“It was just awesome to see [the Troop Support workforce] in action, and humbling to be a part of it during this brief period that I’ve had the good fortune to command this organization,” Lawrence said.

Lawrence returned to his hometown of Philadelphia in June 2019 as the commander, having grown up less than 15 minutes away in Roslyn, Pennsylvania and serving as the aide-de-camp to the commander previously in his Army career.

Less than nine months later, the world changed due to COVID-19. Lawrence’s pace in transforming global logistics from his role as the DLA Troop Support Commander accomplished:
      - $19.1 billion in fiscal 2020 warfighter support,
      - $13 billion in Small Business contracts,
      - More than $1 billion in COVID-19 relief for the nation,
      - Realignment of Class IX hardware items and workforce, and
      - 10% increase in positive organizational climate and culture feedback.

“When the nation responds to crisis and requires contingency support, among the first to receive the call is DLA, and by proxy, DLA Troop Support,” Lawrence said.

DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic presided over the ceremony, thanking Lawrence for these accomplishments and wishing him well.

“Your leadership of DLA Troop Support over these two years has been masterful. On behalf of DLA, I want to thank you for a job well done,” Skubic said.

Lawrence was humbled by the thanks, passing it on to his DLA Troop Support team in acknowledgement of their “on time, on target” support of the warfighter and nation.  

“When I am asked, I tell everyone: Troop Support is what Troop Support does best,” Lawrence said. “As I give up the reins today I leave confident that you are ready, and you are postured, to continue to answer the [nation’s] call ... to provide the highest level of support to the warfighter.”

Lawrence’s next assignment will be the Deputy Chief of Staff for logistics with the U.S. Army Forces Command at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Deputy Commander Richard Ellis will assume the authority of command for DLA Troop Support until the new, yet-to-be-named, military commander arrives.
Exhibit 15.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820 on Form S-8 filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd.(the "Company") and in the Shelf Prospectus filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd. with the Israeli Securities Authority and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange on July 21, 2009,of our reports dated May 9, 2010 relating to (1) the consolidated financial statements of the Company which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to claims that have been filed against Group companies and for some of which petitions have been filed for certification as class actions; and (2) the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 /s/ Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.
 Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.
 Certified Public Accountants
 A member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
 
 Tel-Aviv, Israel
 May 9, 2010
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43350

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DENISE E. CLARK,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 308

Filed: January 6, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey, District Judge. 

Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed. 

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Denise E. Clark pled guilty to grand theft. I.C. §§ 18-2403(1), 18-2407(1)(b). The 

district court sentenced Clark to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of 

confinement of one year. The district court suspended the sentence and placed Clark on 

probation.

Clark thereafter admitted to violating the terms of her probation. The district court 

revoked probation but placed Clark back on probation with the requirement that she complete the 

drug court program. Clark was discharged from drug court and admitted to again violating the 

terms of her probation. The district court revoked probation, ordered execution of her previously 
2

suspended sentence, but retained jurisdiction. After Clark completed her rider, the district court 

relinquished jurisdiction. Clark moved for a reduction of her sentenced pursuant to I.C.R 35, 

which the district court denied. Clark appeals, claiming that the district court erred by refusing 

to grant probation.

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to 

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district 

court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood, 102 

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee, 117 Idaho 203, 205-06, 786 P.2d 594, 596-

97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the 

information before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold that Clark has 

failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdiction.

Clark argues that all of the relevant goals of sentencing could have been accomplished 

with probation. As noted above, however, the district court found that probation was not an 

appropriate course of action in Clark’s case. 

The order of the district court relinquishing jurisdiction is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Robert L. Demorest, certify that:

 

1.      I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MOCON, Inc.; 

 

2.                   Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.                   Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.                   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a)                  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b)                 Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

 

c)                  Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a)                  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

 

b)                 Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  May 16, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Robert L. Demorest                |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert L. Demorest                    |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

----
The Effects of Ultra-Low Sulfur 


Gasoline on Emissions from Tier 2 


Vehicles in the In-Use Fleet 


Final Report
 

Appendix F
 

Sensitivity Analysis of Influential Vehicles
 

Assessment and Standards Division 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

NOTICE 

This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or 

positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data that 

are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of technical developments. 

EPA-420-R-14-002 

March 2014 
             

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix F. Sensitivity Analysis of Influential Vehicles

Percent Reduction in Emissions from 28 ppm to 5 ppm Fuel Sulfur on In-Use Tier 2 Vehicles 

Pollutant Bag Final Model 

(p-value) 

Model with Influential Vehicles Removed 

(p-value) 

NOx Bag 1 7.1% (0.0216) 7.4% (0.0125) 

Bag 2 51.9% (< 0.0001) 52.1% (<0.0001)

 Bag 3 47.8% (< 0.0001) 40.3% (<0.0001) 

FTP Composite 14.1% (0.0008) 12.2% (0.0008) 

Bag1-Bag3 – a

 – a 

THC Bag 1 9.2% (0.0002) 8.2% (0.0002) 

Bag 2 43.3% (< 0.0001) 40.0% (<0.0001) 

Bag 3 40.2% (< 0.0001) 39.7% (<0.0001) 

FTP Composite 15.3% (< 0.0001) 12.5% (<0.0001) 

Bag1-Bag3 5.9% (0.0074) 6.3% (0.0006) 

CO Bag 1 6.7% (0.0131) 5.7% (0.0013) 

 Bag 2 – a

 – a 

Bag 3 15.9% (0.0003) 19.7% (<0.0001) 

FTP Composite 9.5% (< 0.0001) 7.9% (0.0006) 

Bag1-Bag3 – a

 – a 

NMHC Bag 1 8.1% (0.0017) 7.4% (<0.0001) 

Bag 2 42.7% (0.0003) 50.0% (<0.0001) 

Bag 3 54.7% (< 0.0001) 41.6% (<0.0001) 

FTP Composite 12.4% (< 0.0001) – b

 Bag1-Bag3 – b – b 

CH4 Bag 1 16.6% (< 0.0001) 14.5% (<0.0001) 

Bag 2 51.8% (< 0.0001) 47.4% (<0.0001) 

Bag 3 29.2% (< 0.0001) 31.0% (<0.0001) 

FTP Composite 29.3% (< 0.0001) 25.7% (<0.0001)

 Bag1-Bag3 – b

 – b 

PM Bag 1 – a – a

 Bag 2 – a – a

 Bag 3 – a – a

 FTP Composite – a – a

 Bag1-Bag3 – a – a 

a Sulfur level not significant at α = 0.10. b Inconclusive because the mixed model did not converge.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         162,693
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,063,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         718,524   
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,120,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      3,151,024
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          696,776
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,011,899
<OTHER-SE>                                    (895,415)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,120,272
<SALES>                                      4,389,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,542,563
<CGS>                                        4,140,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,622,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             154,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 71,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             71,389
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        


</TABLE>
# L_2011317EN.01003301.xml

| 30.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 317/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 317/33

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION

of 23 October 2011

appointing a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank

(2011/775/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 283(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 11.2 thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the Council of the European Union (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (3),

Whereas:

| (1) | By letter dated 27 September 2011 the President of the European Central Bank, Mr Jean-Claude TRICHET, announced the decision of Mr Jürgen STARK to resign from his position on the Executive Board prior to the end of his term of office on 31 May 2014, and his willingness to remain in function until the date on which his successor takes up his responsibilities. It is therefore necessary to appoint a new member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By letter dated 27 September 2011 the President of the European Central Bank, Mr Jean-Claude TRICHET, announced the decision of Mr Jürgen STARK to resign from his position on the Executive Board prior to the end of his term of office on 31 May 2014, and his willingness to remain in function until the date on which his successor takes up his responsibilities. It is therefore necessary to appoint a new member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank.

| (2) | The European Council wishes to appoint Mr Jörg ASMUSSEN who, in its view, fulfils all the requirements set out in Article 283(2) of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The European Council wishes to appoint Mr Jörg ASMUSSEN who, in its view, fulfils all the requirements set out in Article 283(2) of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Jörg ASMUSSEN is hereby appointed a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank for a term of office of 8 years as from 1 January 2012.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 23 October 2011.

For the European Council

The President

H. VAN ROMPUY

---

(1)  
  OJ L 265, 11.10.2011, p. 29.

1

(2)  Opinion delivered on 13 October 2011.

2

(3)  Opinion delivered on 6 October 2011 (OJ C 301, 12.10.2011, p. 2).

3

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31824-31825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 06/06-0315]


First United Venture Capital Corporation; Notice of Issuance of a 
Small Business Investment Company License

    On August 27, 1997, an application was filed by First United 
Venture Capital Corporation, at 1400 West Main Street, Durant, Oklahoma 
74701, with the Small Business Administration (SBA) pursuant to Section 
107.300 of the Regulations governing small business investment 
companies (13 CFR 107.300 (1997)) for a license to operate as a small 
business investment company.
    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 301(c) of the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, after having 
considered the application and all other pertinent information, SBA 
issued License No. 06/06-0315 on May 22, 1998, First United Venture 
Capital Corporation to operate as a small business investment company.


[[Page 31825]]


(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)

    Dated: May 22, 1998.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 98-15354 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P