alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00242]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL -9919-94-OEI]

Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) responses to Agency Clearance Requests, in compliance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.). An agency may not 
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations are listed 
in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Courtney Kerwin (202) 566-1669, or 
email at kerwin.courtney@epa.gov and please refer to the appropriate 
EPA Information Collection Request (ICR) Number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Responses to Agency Clearance Requests

OMB Approvals

    EPA ICR Number 2380.02; Renewable Fuels Standard Program (RFS2-
Supplemental) (Renewal); 40 CFR part 80, and 40 CFR 80.1450(b)(1) and 
80.1450(b)(2) ; was approved on 10/20/2014; OMB Number 2060-0637; 
expires on 10/31/2017; Approved with change.
    EPA ICR Number 2333.03; Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS2) (Renewal); 
40 CFR part 80, subpart M; was approved on 10/20/2014; OMB Number 2060-
0640; expires on 10/31/2017; Approved with change.
    EPA ICR Number 2060.07; Cooling Water Intake Structures at Existing 
Facilities (Final Rule); 40 CFR parts 122 and 125; was approved on 10/
15/2014; OMB Number 2040-0257; expires on 10/31/2017; Approved with 
change.

Comment Filed

    EPA ICR Number 1907.08; Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements 
Regarding the Sulfur Content of Motor Vehicle Gasoline Under the Tier 2 
Rule (40 CFR part 80, subpart H) (Proposed Rule for Tier 3)); in 40 CFR 
part 80, subpart O; and 40 CFR 80.210; 80.270; 80.330; 80.340; 80.370; 
80.380; 80.400; and 80.415. OMB filed comment on 10/28/2014.

Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collections Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-00242 Filed 1-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### Jay’s Distribs., Inc., Matter of, v Boone

3d Dept: 148 AD3d 1237

denied
# Employee Reflection: Carolyn Emerick

/ Published April 16, 2022

                Environmental Protection Specialist Carolyn Emerick, of DLA Disposition Services Fairbanks, Alaska.                            220404-D-D0441-601                            Environmental Protection Specialist Carolyn Emerick, of DLA Disposition Services Fairbanks, Alaska.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Courtesy photoVIRIN: 220404-D-D0441-601

**Describe your job.**

I am an environmental protection specialist and a Contracting Officer’s Representative. I assist generators in the area for hazardous waste/material removals by monitoring contractor performance and compliance paperwork.

**How long as a fed?**

45 years.

**How long with DLA Disposition Services?**

28 years.

**What was your first job(s)?**

Babysitting and clerk typist for the Federal Aviation Administration.

**Any memorable times with DLA?**

Lots of memories since I first started. From being a secretary to my final position, it has been a series of lots of system changes and from being a part of a full-functioning site to a field office.

**What’s satisfying about the job?**

Keeping hazardous waste and materials moving in a timely manner out of this area. With the system changing, it’s been challenging to make sure it’s done in a timely and compliant manner.

**Any good advice you’ve received?**

Leaders – get out from behind your desk and check on your people. This and teamwork is how to keep the property moving in a timely and safe manner.

**Where do you see yourself in five years?**

Retired.
Exhibit 15.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-13784 and 333-139512) pertaining to employees’ stock option plans of Elbit Systems Ltd. of our reports dated March 13, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Elbit Systems Ltd. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Elbit Systems Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011.




By:
/s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & KasiererKost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer

A member of Ernst & Young Global




Tel-Aviv, Israel, March 13, 2012
No. 09-1178.

#### Jeremy Smith, Petitioner v. Florida.

562 U.S. 828, 131 S. Ct. 72,

178 L. Ed. 2d 24,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6201.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, denied.

Same case below, 22 So. 3d 544.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-4253

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus IGNACIO PINEDA-BERMUDEZ, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-00-360) Submitted: December 12, 2001 Decided: December 20, 2001 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David B. Freedman, WHITE & CRUMPLER, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Benjamin H. White, Jr., United States Attorney, Steven H. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ignacio Pineda-Bermudez appeals his conviction and sentence following his unconditional guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) (West 1999). Because Pineda-Bermudez waived his right to challenge pre-trial suppression issues when he failed to enter a conditional plea pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a)(2), we affirm. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a)(2); United States v. Willis , 992 F.2d 489, 490 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 226 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 226

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain cash 
  rentals of farmland will not cause recapture of special estate tax 
                               valuation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 27 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

 Mr. Daschle (for himself, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Conrad, and Mrs. Kassebaum) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain cash 
  rentals of farmland will not cause recapture of special estate tax 
                               valuation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CASH RENTALS OF FARMLAND NOT TO CAUSE RECAPTURE OF 
              SPECIAL ESTATE TAX VALUATION.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 2032A of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to tax treatment of dispositions and 
failures to use for qualified use) is amended by adding at the end 
thereof the following new paragraph:
            ``(8) Certain cash rental not to cause recapture.--For 
        purposes of this subsection, a qualified heir shall not be 
        treated as failing to use property in a qualified use solely 
        because such heir rents such property on a net cash basis to a 
        member of the decedent's family, but only if, during the period 
        of the lease, such member of the decedent's family uses such 
        property in a qualified use.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to rentals occurring after December 31, 1976.

                                 <all>
```
[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. DeMarco, 2016-Ohio-5916.]

TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION v. DEMARCO. 

[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. DeMarco, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5916.] 

(No. 2014-1738—Submitted September 16, 2016—Decided September 22, 2016.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Robert Paul DeMarco, Attorney 

Registration No. 0031530, last known address in Solon, Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 5, 2015, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from 

the practice of law for a period of one year, with six months stayed on condition, 

finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the 

provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). 

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Toledo Bar Assn. v. DeMarco, 144 Ohio St.3d 

248, 2015-Ohio-4549, 41 N.E.3d 1237. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,

FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 

________________________
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED
                               PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference,  in the  Registration
Statement  No.  333-  18667 on  Amendment  No. 1 to Form SB-2 on Form  S-3,  the
Registration  Statement No. 333- 39327 on Form S-8, the  Registration  Statement
No. 333-65303 on Form S-3, the Registration Statement No. 333-82137 on Form S-8,
and the  Registration  Statement No.  333-30330 on Form S-8, of our report dated
February 25, 1999 on the  Consolidated  Financial  Statement  for the year ended
December  31,  1998  which  appears  in the  annual  report  on Form  10-KSB  of
MyTurn.com, Inc. (f/k/a Compu-DAWN, Inc.) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                              /s/ Lazar Levine & Felix, LLP
                                              -----------------------------
                                              LAZAR LEVINE & FELIX LLP


New York, New York
April 13, 2000


<PAGE>
#### L.C. v. S.C. 5

10/06/2015

499 EAL (2015)

5

. Reconsideration Denied November 9, 2015.

Denied

No. 1802 EDA 2015
#### Jodi Volponi-Hotton, Respondent, v Mark Hotton, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 836]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Blydenburgh, J.), dated April 16, 2003, which granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to direct him to pay the transfer taxes in connection with the transfer of the marital residence to the plaintiff.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that the disposition of marital property, both the amount and the method, is generally left to the sound discretion of the trial court *(see Kiprilova v Kiprilov,*255 AD2d 362, 363 [1998]; *Filax v Filax,*176 AD2d 1194, 1195 [1991]), and “its distribution of the parties’ marital property should not be disturbed unless it can be shown that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in so doing” *(Oster v Goldberg,*226 AD2d 515 [1996]).

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the defendant to pay the transfer taxes in connection with the transfer of the marital residence to the plaintiff. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.
# DLA Distribution announces quarterly award winners

/ Published March 19, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Distribution Deputy Commander Twila Gonzales, Senior Executive Service, has announced the organization’s first quarter, fiscal year 2019 Employee/Team of the Quarter, Military of the Quarter, Mission Impact, and Strategic Goals winners.                             

**Receiving the Employee of the Quarter Award were:**

Carl Alexander, DLA Distribution Norfolk, Virginia

Lauren Mularski, DLA Distribution Puget Sound, Washington

Dustin McCall, DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Arwyn Geronimo, DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan

Gordon Breeden, DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas

Karoline Grimm, DLA Distribution Europe

Nancy Yoachum, DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Nicole Nelson, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California

Geronemo Abelar, DLA Distribution Norfolk, Virginia

Natalie Lee-Haynes, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California

**Receiving the Team of the Quarter Award:**

Building 510 Tornado Recovery Team, DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

**Receiving Military of the Quarter were:**

Company Grade Officer of the Quarter:  Lieutenant Arthur Stone, Jr., USN, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania

Senior Non-Commissioned Officer of the Quarter:  Sergeant First Class Monica Sotobenavides, USA, DLA Distribution Richmond, Virginia

Junior Non-Commissioned Officer of the Quarter:  Logistics Specialist First Class Sanjay Taylor, USN, DLA Distribution Sigonella, Italy

**Receiving the Mission Impact award were:**

Mission Group Performance Management Team, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California (Warfighter First Category)

Inventory Team, DLA Distribution Tobyhanna, Pennsylvania (Strong Partnerships Category)

Bradford Sims, DLA Distribution J9 (Global Posture Category)

Emergency Operations Support Center, DLA Distribution Norfolk, Virginia (Always Accountable Category)

“Congratulations to all of these outstanding employees.  Your exceptional performance and dedication to excellence make you more than deserving of these awards,” said Gonzales.
No. 09-1448.

#### Mark Cocchiola, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 834, 131 S. Ct. 138,

178 L. Ed. 2d 35,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6168.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 358 Fed. Appx. 376.
# Positive practices emphasized during Child Abuse Prevention Month

/ Published April 2, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
April is Child Abuse Prevention Month and serves as an annual observation to raise awareness of child abuse and prevention.  The statistics about child abuse are stark – in 2018, approximately 678,000 children in the U.S. were found to be victims of child abuse or neglect.

This April, our approach to promoting awareness of child abuse prevention is so very different. Typically, we publish statistics, hold a parade, plant pinwheels, erect banners of children playing and laughing, and reach out to our community with information tables.  Those activities are not possible in our current environment but that doesn’t mean there aren’t opportunities to raise awareness about preventing child abuse.

If you have children, you’re probably reading this from your home, trying to balance teleworking, wrangling your children and wondering who gave your child the annoying noisy toy that seems to NEVER run out of batteries! All of us are going to be pushed to our limits in the coming days as we adjust to this new normal, and it is particularly challenging to children.  So, how about some ways to reduce stress and focus on activities and positive practices that you can do at home?

• Set a schedule and then be flexible!  Remember your old schedule was based on a very different lifestyle. We’re not moving as much, we’re eating differently and we don’t have our usual social interactions. Build your new schedule around these new factors.

• Find resources!  MWR has developed several resource webpages during this new “normal.” The CDC Story Time webpage features videos of CDC teachers and staff reading and singing.  The Virtual Family Resource webpage has links to counseling and crisis resources, education, virtual trips, story times and zoos. 

• Most importantly, reach out and keep connected.  We might be social distancing but we can keep connected!
#### Gorman v. Aria Health

11/17/2015

356 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 1047
1 The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-3805

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Harold Thomas Victor, Jr., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 30, 2004 Filed: September 2, 2004

___________ Before WOLLMAN, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Harold Victor (Victor) pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2), and 924(e). The district court 1 sentenced him as an armed career criminal to the statutory minimum of 180 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Victor’s counsel moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the denial of motions to suppress evidence and statements, and Victor’s sentence.-2- As part of his plea agreement, Victor explicitly waived his right to pursue any pretrial issues he raised or could have raised, his right to appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 any lawful sentence not exceeding 210 months imprisonment, and his right to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Because the record demonstrates Victor’s plea and plea agreement were voluntary and he understood he was waiving his appellate rights, his sentence is consistent with the plea agreement, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the appeal waiver, we enforce the waiver and dismiss this appeal. SeeUnited States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-91 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). We have reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Price of Port Huron, MI Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Price of Port Huron, MI Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 3.10   | 3.53   | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned hereby appoints J. Peter Ricketts as his agent and
attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form
10-K relating to the year ending September 29, 2000, and any amendments thereto,
required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Ameritrade
Holding Corporation.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the 13th day of December, 2000.



/s/ Gene L. Finn
----------------------
Gene L. Finn, Director
From: Bodner, Paul [ mailto:Paul.Bodner@ct.gov ]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 1:02 PM
To: Simcox, Alison
Cc: Farrell, Paul Subject: RE: OWF statute

Hi Alison,

DEEP would like to withdraw the statute (CGS 22a

- 174k) from consideration for the PM2.5 SIP. DEEP is actively trying to get the statute revised for multiple reasons, including:

1) To include mandatory emission limits based on EPA’s voluntary Hydronic Heaters Program (currently the statute addresses only setback distance, stack height and oper ating practices);

2) There is a flaw in the statute that could result in a period of time when OWF’s are unregulated.

In CGS 22a

- 174k(b), the statute specifies “ No person shall, from July 8, 2005, to the effective date of regulations promulgated by the U nited States Environmental Protection Agency to regulate outdoor wood

- burning furnaces, construct, install, establish, modify, operate or use an
outdoor wood

- burning furnace, unless ... ”. When EPA issues a regulation there will likely be a lag period betwe en the date the EPA regulation becomes effective and the date that EPA’s required emission limits must be implemented

. During this period, neither the CT statute nor the EPA emission limits would apply.

It is also worth noting that withdrawal of the statute from the SIP approval will not change any of the emission estimates presented in the PM2.5 Maintenance Plan, since no emission benefit was calculated
for the statute.

Hopefully this provides enough in formation to move forward with the redesignation without including the OWF statute in the SIP approval.

Thanks.
Paul



### Paul Bodner Planning & Standards Division Bureau of Air Management Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection 79 Elm S treet, Hartford, CT 06106

- 5127 P: 860

- 424

- 3383 | F: 860

- 706

- 5339 | E: paul.bodner@ct.gov
#### Burda v. Burda1

06/30/2015

271 MAL (2015)

1

. Reconsideration Denied August 13, 2015.

Denied

Pa.Super., 116 A.3d 687