alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2155 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 2155

 To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the 
 cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at 
 Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

 Mr. Hatfield introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

                June 29 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the 
 cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at 
 Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory 
Authorization Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. FOREST ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY.

    (a) In General.--Subject to the availability of funds appropriated 
under subsection (c), the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the 
Cooperative State Research Service, shall provide the Federal share of 
the cost of planning and constructing a Forest Ecosystem Research 
Laboratory at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share provided under subsection (a) 
shall be 50 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

                                 <all>
```
May 16, 2014

CAAP-13-0000150

#### State v. Ogan

Reversed
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,Darrell B. Lee, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MOCON, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sBoard of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date:  May 21, 2007
| /s/ Darrell B. Lee                            |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Darrell B. Lee                                |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer and Vice President   |   |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
#### Com. v. Leon

09/29/2015

132 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 116 A.3d 703
2017-1315.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Deters.

Sua sponte, Mark Alan Deters, Attorney Registration No. 0085094, last known business address in Bellbrook, Ohio, found in contempt for failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before October 30, 2017.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
EXHIBIT
32.1




STATEMENT
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Thomas
Granville, Principal Executive Officer of Axion Power International, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:





The
Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December
31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Thomas GranvilleThomas
      Granville, Principal Executive
                OfficerDated:
      November 6, 2009
Opinion issued August 6, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00196-CV

———————————

MAGDANNA OVAKIMYAN, Appellant

V.

RICARDO MANUEL CABRERA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2018-65726

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Magdanna Ovakimyan, has neither established indigence nor paid 

or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); TEX.R. APP. P. 37.3(b) 

(allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault). The 
2

Court notified appellant by letter dated June 12, 2020 that this appeal was subject to

dismissal and advised appellant that she must respond by July 13, 2020 to avoid 

dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal). Appellant 

did not respond.

We dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule

requiring payment of fees); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). We 

dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Kelly, and Landau.
159 A.3d 891

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. T.E., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 1, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1509]



[[Page 3308]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent to Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Roxide 
International, Inc., of New Rochelle, New York, an exclusive license to 
Serial No. 08/779,066 filed on January 7, 1997, entitled ``Whitefly 
Trap.'' Notice of Availability was published in the Federal Register on 
August 7, 1997.

DATES: Comments must be received by March 23, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
Room 415, Building 005, BARC-West, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights to 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Roxide International, Inc., 
has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The 
prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply 
with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The 
prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within sixty (60) 
days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research 
Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that 
the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
Richard M. Parry, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-1509 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
No. 12-7751.

#### Hibbler *v.*Benedetti, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# DLA Aviation commander meets with Richmond VA Medical Center leadership, tours facility

/ Published Oct. 24, 2019
RICHMOND, VA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. David Sanford toured the Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Administration Medical Center in Richmond, Virginia, Oct. 21 as part of his initiative to cultivate strong partnerships with local civic, educational, military and veterans organizations. 

During his visit, Sanford received a briefing from director J. Ronald Johnson and other members of the leadership team about the services provided to veterans at the facility. Services at McGuire are available to more than 200,000 veterans coming from 52 cities and counties covering 22,515 miles of central and southern Virginia and parts of northern North Carolina.

After the briefing, Sanford spent about 45 minutes touring various departments, including the Prosthetic Treatment Center and Spinal Cord Injury and Disorder Department.
**Exhibit10(o)(4)**

 

AMENDMENT NO. 3

TO

ALLTEL CORPORATION 401(k)PLAN

(January 1, 2001Restatement)

 

WHEREAS, ALLTEL Corporation (the "Company")maintains the ALLTEL Corporation 401(k) Plan, as amended and restated effectiveJanuary 1, 2001, and subsequently further amended, (the "Plan"); and

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires further to amend thePlan;

 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Companyhereby amends the Plan in the respects hereinafter set forth:

 

1.                                      Effective coincident with the Closing within the meaning of the StockPurchase Agreement by and between ALLTEL Corporation and Fidelity NationalFinancial, Inc. dated as of January 28, 2003 (the "SP Agreement"), Section 1.14of the Plan is amended to provide as follows:

 

1.14                          Employer

 

ALLTEL Corporation and any other member of theControlled Group that has adopted the Plan pursuant to Section 3.01 or anycorresponding predecessor provision of the Plan.

 

2.                                      Effective as of March 31, 2003, Section 1.34 of the Plan is amended toprovide as follows:

 

1.34                          Settlement Date

 

The date on which a Participant's interest underthe Plan becomes distributable in accordance with Article XIV and Article XVfollowing his termination of service.  Beginning March 31, 2003, aParticipant's interest under the Plan becomes distributable in accordance withArticle XIV and Article XV following his termination of service, his "severancefrom employment" within the meaning of Section 401(k)(2)(B)(i)(l) of the Code,or both.  Beginning March 31, 2003, the immediately preceding sentenceshall apply to a Participant who had a "severance from employment" within themeaning of Section 401(k)(2)(B)(i)(l) of the Code, but not a termination ofservice, prior to April 1, 2003.

 

 

----
#### In the Matter of Sutton S., Appellant. Nassau County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Abigail E.S., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Tucker S., Appellant. Nassau County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Abigail E.S., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Briggs S., Appellant. Nassau County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Abigail E.S., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 3.) In the Matter of Sophia S., Appellant. Nassau County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Abigail E.S., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 4.)

[58 NYS3d 532]

Appeal by the subject children from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Robin M. Kent, J.), dated March 2, 2016. The order, without a hearing, granted the petition of the Nassau County Department of Social Services, inter alia, to vacate a prior order of protection of that court dated June 30, 2015, against the mother and in favor of the children.

Ordered that the order dated March 2, 2016, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In this Family Court Act article 10 proceeding, the petitioner, the Nassau County Department of Social Services, filed a petition on November 16, 2015, inter alia, to vacate a prior order of protection against the mother and in favor of the subject children. The children, through their attorney, opposed the petition. The Family Court, without a hearing, granted the petition and vacated the order of protection.

Pursuant to Family Court Act § 1061, the court may modify an order issued during the course of a proceeding under article 10 for “good cause shown” (Family Ct Act § 1061; *see Matter of Bernalysa K. [Richard S.],*118 AD3d 885, 885 [2014]; *Matter of Kevin M.H. [Kevin H.],*102 AD3d 690, 691 [2013]). “As with an initial order, the modified order ‘must reflect a resolution consistent with the best interests of the children after consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, and must be supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record’ ” *(Matter of Kenneth QQ. [Jodi QQ.],*77 AD3d 1223, 1224 [2010], quoting *Matter of Elijah Q.,*36 AD3d 974, 976 [2007]). The court has discretion in determining whether a hearing is necessary upon a motion to vacate an existing dispositional order *(see*Family Ct Act § 1064; *Matter of Allison C. [Angel C.],*130 AD3d 1026*609[2015]; *Matter of Carrie F. v David PP.,*34 AD3d 1108, 1109 [2006]). Where the court possesses information sufficient to afford a comprehensive, independent review, a hearing is not required *(see Matter of Allison C. [Angel C.],*130 AD3d 1026 [2015]; *Matter of Carrie F. v David PP.,*34 AD3d at 1109). Here, the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the petition without a hearing. Moreover, the record supports the court’s determination that the petitioner established good cause to vacate the order of protection against the mother.

Balkin, J.P., Austin, Roman and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
No. 09-11146.

#### Jesus Alvarez-Ramos, Petitioner v. United States.

562 U.S. 864, 131 S. Ct. 147,

178 L. Ed. 2d 88,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6701.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 369 Fed. Appx. 835.
No. 07-14-00430-CR

In re Hector Madrid, Relator Original Proceeding

 

January 6, 2015

 

§

§

§

§

§

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of this Court dated January 6, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby

dismissed.

o O o

FILE COPY
Opinion issued October 11, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00413-CV

———————————

KENNETH HANNA JUNIOR, Appellant

V.

GONZALEZ WALL SYSTEMS AND 

SHAHMORADI & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 10th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 14-CV-1315

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Kenneth Hanna Junior and appellee Gonzalez Wall Systems have 

filed an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal. No opinion has issued in this appeal. 

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.
CAAP-11-0001075

#### State v. Mano

Affirmed
# Four DLA employees graduate from service college

/ Published June 22, 2021
District of Columbia, 
After a challenging 10-month academic year, four new national security leaders returned to Defense Logistics Agency upon graduating from Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security & Resource Strategy June 10.  

DLA Energy’s Rachel Dunlap, Khalid Hamidi, and John Phinisey and DLA Logistics Operations’ Peter Battaglia each earned a Master of Science in National Resource Strategy during the program.

“DLA champions an environment that encourages employees to reach their full potential,” said DLA Energy Acting Deputy Commander Patricia Wilkins. “Our employees are our greatest resource and with that in mind, we're committed to developing high-performing employees who are capable of meeting future mission challenges.”

Every year, DLA sends rising senior leaders to the Eisenhower School as part of the Executive Development Program. The purpose of the EDP is to develop DLA’s current and future leaders, prepare them to effectively navigate and manage leadership challenges, and develop leadership competencies critical to maintaining supply chain excellence.

The program is very selective, and participants must first be nominated by their respective commands before being interviewed and nominated by the DLA Executive Resource Board that consists of the DLA Vice Director and agency Senior Executive Service members.

“John, Khalid, Rachel and Peter are defined by those rare qualities sought in Eisenhower School graduates,” said Steve Dubernas, DLA Faculty Chair at the Eisenhower School. “They're scholars-practitioners ready to lead in the future National Security environment.”  

Dubernas is a full-time DLA employee on a three-year detail and was the DLA student's primary faculty advisor. He serves as the lead for the Global Agility Industry Study and teaches courses at NDU.

In addition to the traditional required Industry Studies course work, students participated in specific concentrations and courses of study designed to provide an in-depth understanding of a particular field or community. Phinisey focused on the Organic Industrial Base, Hamidi participated in the Financial Management Concentration and Dunlap participated in the Senior Acquisition Course. Battaglia participated in the Biotechnology Industry Study to learn more about harnessing cellular and biomolecular processes to develop technologies and products.  

“I was honored to have the opportunity to participate in this exceptional program and to meet and learn from high caliber professionals,” Dunlap said. “I'm excited to bring back the new knowledge and experiences to DLA.”

National Defense University’s mission is to educate joint Warfighters in critical thinking and the creative application of military power to inform national strategy and globally integrated operations.
..-K^PORTATIO M • -htC^^ERATiON S SERVE D AUGUST15 , 201 1 .r; i ,M G I S P 2 : 1 8

U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
INTH EMATTERO F M & RHELICOPTERS , LL C FA ADOCKE T No
. CPlOSOOOl 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S No
. FAA-2010-121 1
ORDE R SEALIN G PORTIO N O F TH E DOCKE T Sectio n 13.22 6 o fth e Rule s o fPractic e i n FA ACivi l Penalt yActions , 1 4 C.F.R

. §13,226 , permit s m e t o witlihol d record s fro m publi cdisclosur e i fI determin e tha t "disclosur e woul d b e detrimenta l t o aviatio n safety , disclosur e woul d no t b e i n th e publi cinterest , o rtha t th e informatio n i s no t otherwis e require d t o b e mad e availabl e t o th e public. " Thi s matte rinvolve s a pleadin g whos e disclosure , I find , woul d no t b e i n th e publi cinterest

. Further , th e informatio n therei n i s no t otherwis e require d t o b e mad e availabl e t o th e public

. WHEREFORE , i t b e an d i s hereb yORDERE D a s follows : 1

. Respondent' s ""Memorandu m o fLawSupportin g Dismissa l o f Citation, " date d May20 , 2011 , b e an d i s hereb ySEALE D an d shal l b e remove d fro m th e publi cportio n o fth e docke t an d remove d fro m "Regulations.gov " unti l furthe rorder ; an dTh e docke t cler k shal l sea l tha t portio n o f th e docke t an d inser t a pag e statin g "Confidentia l - No t fo rPubli cDisclosure"

.

lichardC
. Goodwi

n Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachmen

t - Servic e Lis tFA ADocke t No
. CPlOSOOOl 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) REVISE D SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ^

ON ECOP Y Michae l Selig , MD , FACC , CFI-H , Respondent' s Representativ e 281 6 Orefiel dRoa d Allentown , P A1810 4 TEL : 610-360-395 3 FAX : Charle s Raley , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Enforcemen t

Division/AGC-30 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 TEL : 202-267-335 7 FAX : 202-267-510 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i nperso no r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio nAdministration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.