alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 333-51500, No. 333-67303 and No. 333-48183) of AmeriPath, Inc. of
our report dated March 24, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Pathology Consultants of America, Inc. and subsidiaries (d/b/a/
InformDx) as of December 31, 1999 and for the two year period then ended
included in the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of AmeriPath,
Inc and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2000.



                                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Nashville, Tennessee
August 8, 2001
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

JOSEPH SCHIANO,

Claimant

- Appellant,

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 7101

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 13

- 81, Judge Margaret C. Bartley.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Joseph Schiano moves without opposition to withdraw his appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. Case: 14-7101 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 10/23/2014SCHIANO v. MCDONALD 2

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

s21

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: October 23, 2014 Case: 14-7101 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 10/23/2014
### -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

36 37 38 39 40 

## ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/25 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.95 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■
■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### Anonymous, Appellant, v Anonymous, Respondent.

[66 NYS3d 235]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Deborah A. Kap-lan, J.), entered February 9, 2017, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant wife’s application for a declaratory judgment that she is entitled to retain as her separate property the insurance proceeds issued to replace the loss of her separate property jewelry, and directed plaintiff husband to cooperate so that such proceeds are paid directly to the wife, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly determined that the wife was entitled to the insurance proceeds paid to the parties by joint check, notwithstanding that the claim was filed under a joint insurance policy. The proceeds were indisputably to compensate her for the loss of her separate property, as defined by the parties’ prenuptial agreement. Contrary to the husband’s contention, the wife was not judicially estopped from asserting a separate property claim on the insurance proceeds check based on her position during a prior motion sequence that joint tax refund checks were joint property under the parties’ prenuptial agreement. The judicial estoppel doctrine “precludes a party who assumed a certain position in a prior legal proceeding and who secured a judgment in his or her favor from assuming a contrary position in another action simply because his or her interests have changed” *(Dhamoon v 230 Park S. Apts., Inc.,*48 AD3d 103, 112 [1st Dept 2007]; *see also Maas v Cornell Univ.,*253 AD2d 1, 5 [3d Dept 1999], *affd*94 NY2d 87 [1999]). Judicial estoppel does not apply where, as here, the prior action does not result in a judgment (see *Douglas v Dashevsky,*62 AD3d 937, 938 [2d Dept 2009]). The prior tax refund order only determined that the husband did not demonstrate, as a matter of law, that tax refund checks issued in both parties’ names in connection with jointly filed tax returns were not martial property because the husband had paid the taxes. The court determined that there were issues of fact, and reserved decision on, whether the wife knowingly signed the checks over to the husband, allowing him to deposit the joint tax refunds into his separate account, or he did so without her knowledge.

Regarding the husband’s further argument that the motion *413court abused its discretion by disregarding the “law of the case,” the doctrine has no binding force on appeal *(see Martin v City of Cohoes,*37 NY2d 162, 165 [1975]; *Lipsztein v Donovan,*289 AD2d 51, 52 [1st Dept 2001]). The court properly determined that the wife is entitled to retain the insurance proceeds received for missing jewelry as her separate property because it is in accordance with the intent and reasonable expectations of the parties. The prenuptial agreement expressly provided that any jewelry gifted by the husband to the wife constitutes the wife’s separate property and not marital property *(see e.g. Macy’s Inc. v Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.,*127 AD3d 48, 54 [1st Dept 2015]; *Strong v Dubin,*75 AD3d 66, 68 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur—Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15216]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-567-000]


PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation; Notice of Request 
Under Blanket Authorization

June 3, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 20, 1998, PG&E as Transmission, Northwest 
Corporation (Applicant), 2100 Southwest River Parkway, Portland, 
Oregon, filed in Docket No, CP98-567-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.211) for approval to replace an 
existing meter set and modify regulator equipment at an existing meter 
station in Umatilla, Washington, for delivery of natural gas to Cascade 
Natural Gas Corporation, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas 
Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth in the request which is on file 
with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15216 Filed 6-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                                [GRAPHIC OMITTED]


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors
Elbit Medical Imaging Ltd.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-117509) on Form S-8 of Elbit Medical Imaging Ltd. of our report dated March
30, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Plaza Centers
(Europe) B.V. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report
appears in the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Medical
Imaging Ltd.





KPMG Hungaria Kft.




Budapest, Hungary
March 30, 2005
# DLA director meets Richmond-based employees, praises commitment to mission 

/ Published April 29, 2021
Richmond, Va. , 
                Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. David Sanford escorts DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic in the foyer of the DLA Aviation Operations Center April 16, 2021, while visiting Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. (Photo by Jackie Roberts)                            DLA director meets Richmond-based employees, praises commitment                            Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. David Sanford escorts DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic in the foyer of the DLA Aviation Operations Center April 16, 2021, while visiting Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. (Photo by Jackie Roberts)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Jackie RobertsVIRIN: 210416-D-YB435-1004

DLA Aviation Operations Center

ALOC functions 

                La’Tayna Williams, acting area manager for Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Richmond, left, and Christopher Edgerton, a wage supervisor for DLA Disposition Services Richmond, far right, escort DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic through a warehouse bay April 16, 2021, while explaining their mission at Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. (Photo by Jackie Roberts)            

                DLA director meets Richmond-based employees, praises commitment            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Jackie Roberts

VIRIN: 210416-D-YB435-1002
# 2020 DLA Hall of Fame inductees announced

/ Published July 13, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Former Defense Logistics Agency Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams has announced inductees into the 2020 DLA Hall of Fame.

“The DLA Hall of Fame recognizes former DLA civilian and military team members who made significant and lasting contributions to this agency and its mission, and represent the core DLA values and ideals we strive to uphold today,” Williams wrote in a memo to DLA senior leaders.

Inductees are:
      - Retired Army Lt. Gen. Donald M. Babers, former DLA director;
      - Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Andrew E. Busch, former DLA director;
      - Milton K. Lewis, former acquisition executive, DLA Land and Maritime;
      - Paul Mank, former acting deputy director, DLA Disposition Services;
      - Retired Army Lt. Gen. Raymond Mason, former DLA Troop Support commander;
      - Sandra M. Miller, former staff director, Human Capital Program Development, DLA Human Resources;
      - Tony Poleo, former DLA Finance director;
      - Walter Thomas, former DLA associate general counsel; and
      - Susan L. VanMeter, former portfolio manager, Electronic Business Systems, DLA Information Operations.

Barring COVID-19 restrictions, the honorees will be inducted 10:30 a.m. Sept. 29 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex on Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Information on previous inductees is available at the DLA Hall of Fame webpage.
# DLA Susquehanna Fire Department awarded international accredited status

/ Published Sept. 22, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
The Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Susquehanna Fire Department received accredited agency status with the Commission on Fire Accreditation International for meeting the criteria established through the CFAI’s voluntary self-assessment and accreditation program Aug. 24.

Barry J. Shughart, the DLA Installation Management Susquehanna fire chief, is happy the department received accredited agency status.

“The department’s achievement of accredited agency status demonstrates our commitment to provide the highest quality of service to Defense Logistics Agency, the Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna and our surrounding communities,” he said. “We have also been able to use the CFAI’s process as a proactive mechanism to plan for the future of this department and locate areas where we can improve on the quality of service we provide.”

CFAI is dedicated to assisting the fire and emergency services agencies throughout the world in achieving excellence through self-assessment and accreditation in order to provide continuous quality improvement and the enhancement of service delivery to their communities. The CFAI process is voluntary and provides an agency with an improvement model to assess their service delivery and performance internally and then works with a team of peers from other agencies to evaluate their completed self-assessment.

The DLA Susquehanna fire department is one of more than 250 agencies to achieve internationally accredited agency status with the CFAI and the Center for Public Safety Excellence, Inc.

DLA Susquehanna was initially accredited in 2010 and has since been reaccredited a total of three times. Members have spent countless hours examining past, current and future services, as well as internal performance metrics to compare them to current research and industry best practices.
ROBER TA.B . REICHER T MAVO R 

## ^EF^RTMENTO F AMSPORWIO N ' S / A:;;H TOPERATION S 7 0 0 POPLA R STREE T P.O . BO X 24 7 •ilcON , GEORSr A31202-024 7 OFFIC E O F TH E MAYO R H



## P O DE C I 3 A\0 : 5,kf

c

Decembe r10,201 0 

# b(yr'dsr.uc7-U(D7 i Mr . Dcnni. s DcVaii y Chief, Essentia l Ai rServic e Division , X-5 3 Offic e o fAviatio n Analysi s Departmen t ofTrnn.sportalio n 40 0 Sevent h Street , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Dea rMr . DcVany : Than k yo u fo ryou rinvitatio n t o provid e comment s o n behal f o f ou rcommunit yregaidin g th e Essentia l Ai rServic e proposal s receive d fo rth e Middl e Georgi a Regiona l Airport . I appreciat e th e interes t o fal l applicant s i n servin g ou rcommunity . Th e Maco n Cit yCounci l an d I hav e give n carefu l revie wt o eac h proposal . Ou rsuppor t i s give n t o Gulfstrean i International' s proposa l a s i t appear

s th e bes t equippe d t o successfull yserve passenger s i n thi s regio n whil e als o most responsiv e t o th e HA S progra m requirements . B yalternativel yservin g th e Orland o an d Tamp a Airi>ort s a s hub s i n lie u o f Atlanta , w cconcu r wit h Gulfstrcam' s increase d passenge rprojections . Leisur e an d busines s destination s i n themselves , Orland o an d Tamp a servic e woul d als o allo wtraveler s a n impressiv e choic e o f connection s t o more tha n 11 7 cities , includin g 3 0 international . Gulfslrca m wil l sel l it s flight s throug h majo rtrave l website s an d agencie s an d wil l allo wpassenger s t o boo k

multipl e airlin e leg s unde ra singl e itinerary . Additionall y Gulfstrcam' s interlin e e-tickclin g agreements allo wpassenger s an d baggag e t o seamlessl yconnec t t o al l th e majo rcarriers . Gulfstrea m appear s t o meet al l othe rprogra m requirements , includin g a historyo f successfull yservin g othe rEA S markets . W e have give n heav

yconsideratio n t o th e fac t tha t th e curren t enplanemen t level s ar e exceedin g th e subsid ypcr-passcngc rcap . Whil e Gulfstrcam' s tota l cost ma yb e highe rtha n th e othe roptions , th e relativ e cos t i s manage d b yGulfstrcam' s commitmen t t o not t o excee d th e $20 0 pcr-passcnge rprogra m cap . Pacifi cWing s proposa l appear s t o excee d th e pe rpassenge rca p base d o n it s enplanemen t estimates . Than k yo u fo ryou rtim e an d consideratio n i n thi s selection . Shoul d yo u hav e an yquestions , pleas e d o not hesitat e t o contac t me .

RABR/n s 

# . A Rober t A.B . Reichcr

t Mayo r
No. 09-1446.

#### Kenneth Taggart, Petitioner v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., et al.

562 U.S. 834, 131 S. Ct. 138,

178 L. Ed. 2d 34,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6681.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

*35Same case below, 353 Fed. Appx. 731.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                          16,765
<SECURITIES>                                     4,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (425)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,101
<PP&E>                                          10,864
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,159)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,835
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,377
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,785
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (735)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,280
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,280
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74







</TABLE>
#### Com. v. Wells

08/16/2016

112, 114, 115 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 602
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

Certification of
Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 USC §1350,as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of TTI Team Telecom International Ltd. (the
Company) for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Israel
(Eli) Ofer, certify, pursuant to 18 USC §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |                        
|--------------------- | -----------------------
|
|
|
|
|Dated: March 31, 2008 | /s/ Israel (Eli) Ofer  
|                      | Israel (Eli) Ofer      
|                      | Chief Financial Officer



---

---
#### In the Matter of Melijah NN. and Another, Alleged to be Permanently Neglected Children. Sullivan County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Russell NN., Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 440]

Lynch, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Sullivan County (Meddaugh, J.), entered April 6, 2016, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate the subject children to be permanently neglected.

Respondent is the biological father of two children (born in 2008 and 2009), both of whom have been in foster care since June 2013. In September 2015, petitioner commenced this proceeding alleging that respondent permanently neglected the children due, in part, to his recurring substance abuse issues and incarceration. The father had been incarcerated throughout the period of foster care until he was released on parole in October 2015. At the start of the fact-finding hearing, respondent’s counsel was unable to explain his absence. It then came to light, through the testimony of respondent’s parole officer, that respondent had relapsed and tested positive for cocaine and heroin use on February 10, 2016. Prior to the hearing, the parole officer had advised respondent to turn himself in because there was a warrant outstanding for his arrest. After the fact-finding hearing, Family Court determined that petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that re*1349spondent had permanently neglected the children.1 A disposi-tional hearing was thereafter held and, in May 2016, Family Court terminated respondent’s parental rights and freed the children for adoption. Respondent now appeals from the order of fact-finding only.2

Respondent’s appeal must be dismissed, for no appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order in a permanent neglect proceeding *(see Matter of Alyssa L. [Deborah K.],*93 AD3d 1083, 1084-1085 [2012]). Given respondent’s default at the fact-finding hearing and the apparent lack of merit in his appellate brief, we decline to treat respondent’s notice of appeal as a request for permission to appeal *(see id.).*

McCarthy, J.R, Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

1

. The mother’s parental rights were terminated in November 2014.

2

. There is no indication in the record that respondent appealed from the dispositional order, which would ordinarily bring up for review the finding of permanent neglect (see *Matter of Michael JJ. [Gerald JJ.],*101 AD3d 1288, 1289 n 1 [2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 860 [2013]; *Matter of Arianna I. [Roger I.],*100 AD3d 1281, 1282 n 1 [2012]), except, like here, when the fact-finding order is issued upon default (see *Matter of Adele T. [Kassandra T.],*143 AD3d 1202, 1203 [2016]).