[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31616-31617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15443]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 98-SW-04-AD; Amendment 39-10583; AD 98-12-29]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Lucas Air Equipment Electric Hoists

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
applicable to Lucas Air Equipment electric hoists (hoists) installed 
on, but not limited to, all models of Eurocopter France SA-360 and SA-
365 helicopters that requires visually inspecting the cable for damage 
before the next hoist operation, blanking (plugging) the electronic 
control box upper vent, and performing an end-of-travel procedure 
before each hoist operation. This amendment is prompted by several 
incidents of cable failures caused by dynamic overload on the winding-
up limit due to uncontrolled excessive speed of the cable, which is 
normally regulated by the automatic speed-reducing mechanism or the 
operator. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent 
breaking of the cable, which could become entangled with a main rotor 
or tail rotor blade, and result in damage or separation of a rotor 
blade, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 15, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Carroll Wright, Aerospace 
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Rotorcraft Standards Staff, 2601 
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137, phone (817) 222-5120, fax (817) 
222-5961.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
directive (AD) that is applicable to Lucas Air Equipment hoists 
installed on, but not limited to, all models of Eurocopter France SA-
360 and SA-365 helicopters was published in the Federal Register on 
April 10, 1998 (63 FR 17738). That action proposed to require visually 
inspecting the cable for damage before the next hoist operation, 
plugging the electronic control box upper vent, and performing an end-
of-travel procedure before each hoist operation.
    Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
in the making of this amendment. No

[[Page 31617]]

comments were received on the proposal or the FAA's determination of 
the cost to the public. The FAA has determined that air safety and the 
public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for 
an editorial change in the ``Applicability'' section of the AD where 
the word ``and'' has been changed to ``or.'' The FAA has determined 
that this change will neither increase the economic burden on an 
operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
    The FAA estimates that 1 helicopter of U.S. registry will be 
affected by this proposed AD, that it will take approximately 2 work 
hours per helicopter to accomplish the proposed actions, and that the 
average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will cost 
approximately $775. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of 
the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $895 to replace the hoist 
and electronic control box.
    The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
from the Rules Docket at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, 
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 
76137.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. Adoption of 
the Amendment.

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec. 39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
to read as follows:

AD 98-12-29  Lucas Air Equipment: Amendment 39-10583. Docket No. 98-
SW-04-AD.

    Applicability: Electric hoists, part numbers (P/N) 76375-030, 
76375-130, 76378, or 76378-100, equipped with electronic control 
boxes, P/N 61148-001, 002, or 006, installed on, but not limited to 
all models of Eurocopter France SA-360 and SA-365 helicopters, 
certificated in any category.

    Note 1: This AD applies to each electric hoist (hoist) equipped 
with an electronic control box (control box) identified in the 
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
requirements of this AD. For hoists that have been modified, 
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
provided in paragraph (e) to request approval from the FAA. This 
approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
eliminates the unsafe condition, or different actions necessary to 
address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request 
should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
remove any hoist or control box from the applicability of this AD.

    Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
previously.
    To prevent breaking of the cable, which could become entangled 
with a main rotor or tail rotor blade, and result in damage or 
separation of a rotor blade, and subsequent loss of control of the 
helicopter, accomplish the following:
    (a) Before the next hoist operation, visually inspect the cable 
for damage in accordance with the applicable maintenance manual, and 
blank (plug) the electronic control box upper vent with a potting 
compound. If the control box has only one vent, install it with the 
vent hole in the lowest position.
    (b) Apply red paint to the hoist cable starting at 0.8 meter (m) 
and extending to the 3m point (31.5 inches to 118 inches) from the 
upper plate of the hook assembly.

    Note 2: Lucas Air Equipment Service Telex 61148-25-CW-01, 
Revision 01, dated April 26, 1994, pertains to the subject of this 
AD.

    (c) Thereafter, before each hoist operation, perform the end-of-
travel procedure as follows:
    (1) With approximately 3m of cable remaining before the hook 
assembly reaches the up-limit switch operating lever (upper end of 
red-painted cable), reduce the cable speed to approximately one-
third of the normal speed with the control knob. Release the control 
knob to the neutral position to stop the hook at a distance 
approximately 0.8m from the hoist up-limit switch operating lever 
(lower end of red-painted cable). Continue controlling the cable 
speed by exclusive use of the control on the pendant, making short 
and repetitive inputs until the hook reaches a position with 5 to 10 
centimeters (2 to 4 inches) between the upper plate of the hook 
assembly and the up-limit switch operating lever. After stopping the 
cable at that point, place the hook against the up-limit switch 
operating lever. The procedure required by this paragraph may be 
accomplished by an owner/operator (pilot) holding at least a private 
pilot certificate, and must be entered into the aircraft records 
showing compliance with this paragraph in accordance with sections 
43.11 and 91.417(a)(2)(v) of the Federal Aviation Regulations.
    (2) If the hook comes fully home at an uncontrolled speed, or 
the hoist exhibits uncontrolled speed variation or absence of 
automatic speed reduction, remove the hoist assembly (hoist and 
control box) and replace it with an airworthy hoist assembly before 
any further hoist operation.
    (d) Installation of an electronic control box, P/N 61148-016 or 
P/N 61148-012, as applicable, with installation of a hoist, P/N 
76375-060, 76375-160, 76378-060, or 76378-160, is a terminating 
action for the requirements of this AD.
    (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used if approved by the Manager, Rotorcraft Standards Staff, 
Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests 
through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or 
comment and then send it to the Manager, Rotorcraft Standards Staff.

    Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
obtained from the Rotorcraft Standards Staff.

    (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter to a location where 
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    (g) This amendment becomes effective on July 15, 1998.

    Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Direction 
Generale De L'Aviation Civile (France) AD 94-116(AB)R1, dated May 
21, 1997.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 3, 1998.
Larry M. Kelly,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 98-15443 Filed 6-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U