alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Yossi Brikman, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on Form  20-F  of Mer  Telemanagement
Solutions LTD.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and other financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods  presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period  in  which  this  annual  report  is being  prepared;

b)  evaluated  the effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures as of a date  within  90 days  prior  to the  filing  date of this
annual  report  (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation  Date;

5. The  registrant's  other  certifying officers  and I have  disclosed,  based
on our most  recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in internal  controls;  and

b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant  role in the  registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal
controls  subsequent  to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any
corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant   deficiencies  and  material
weaknesses.

Date:  June 25,  2003

/s/ Yossi Brikman*
------------------
Yossi Brikman
-------------
Chief Financial Officer

* The originally  executed copy of this  Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
**EXHIBIT 21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN DENTAL PARTNERS, INC.**

PDHC, Ltd., a Minnesota corporation 

Texas Dental Partners, LP, a Texas limited partnership 

Texas Dental Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

American Dental Partners of Wisconsin, LLC, aDelaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Louisiana, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Pennsylvania, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

Apple Park Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

American Dental Partners ofOhio, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Innovative Practice Concepts, Inc., an Arizona corporation 

American Dental Professional Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Virginia, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Maryland, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Alabama, LLC, aDelaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Oklahoma, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of North Carolina, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of California, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

ADP of NewYork, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partners of Tennessee, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Voss Dental Lab Inc., a New York corporation 

American Dental Partners of Michigan, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

American Dental Partnersof Missouri, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Bioenvision, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher B. Wood,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.
|   /s/ Christopher  B. Wood  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher B.  Wood                  |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                                  |
| September 12,  2007                   |

 

----
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2273

To reduce Government spending by $100,000,000,000 each fiscal year until

a balanced Federal budget is achieved.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees

on the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one

Committee reports, the other Committee has thirty days to report or be

discharged

A BILL

To reduce Government spending by $100,000,000,000 each

fiscal year until a balanced Federal budget is achieved.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE.

4 Effective beginning with fiscal year 1995, the Con5 gress shall reduce Government spending by

6 $100,000,000,000 each fiscal year until a balanced Fed7 eral budget is achieved.
2

•S 2273 RIS

1 SEC. 2. BUDGET OUTLAY REDUCTIONS PERMANENT.

2 All obligational authority reduced pursuant to this

3 Act shall be done in a manner that shall make such reduc4 tions permanent.

5 SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS.

6 (a) SEQUESTER.—

7 (1) If the full amount of savings required by

8 this Act have not been achieved in a session of Con9 gress, the Director of the Office of Management and

10 Budget shall notify Congress within 10 calendar

11 days after the end of the session of Congress of the

12 amount of savings that has not been achieved as re13 quired by this Act.

14 (2) Within 15 calendar days after the Congress

15 adjourns and on the same day as any sequestration

16 under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit

17 Control Act of 1985, there shall be a sequestration

18 of the amount of additional required savings that

19 has not been achieved as required by this Act. The

20 sequestration shall be achieved by sequestering one21 half the amount pursuant to section 251 of the Bal22 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of

23 1985 and one-half the amount pursuant to section

24 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit

25 Control Act of 1985.
3

•S 2273 RIS

1 (b) PAYGO SCORECARD.—No reductions in direct

2 spending pursuant to this Act shall be treated as a net

3 deficit decrease for purposes of section 252 of the Bal4 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.

5 (c) DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.—When

6 OMB submits a sequestration report under section 254(g)

7 or (h) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit

8 Control Act of 1985, OMB shall include downward adjust9 ments to discretionary spending limits (in new budget au10 thority and outlays) for the budget year and each outyear

11 to take full account of all reductions in discretionary

12 spending pursuant to this Act for that fiscal year.

13 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

14 As used in this Act, the terms ‘‘budget outlay’’, ‘‘out15 lay’’, ‘‘new budget authority’’, ‘‘direct spending’’, and

16 ‘‘OMB’’ have the meanings given to such terms by section

17 250(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit

18 Control Act of 1985.

Æ
# Harris takes command of DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California

/ Published Aug. 19, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
U.S. Marine Corps Col. Tiffany N. Harris took command of DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California during a ceremony held Aug. 16."Harris is a gifted leader and the right person to continue the strong and outstanding leadership that we have had at San Joaquin,” said Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones, commanding officer, DLA Distribution. “Tiffany has served in a variety of command and staff assignments.”Harris most recently served as the assistant chief of staff (G-3) for the 3D Marine Logistics Group in Okinawa, Japan. She has held multiple staff and command positions from the company to battalion level over her career since she was commissioned through the Platoon Leader Combined Class in 1995.Notably after her battalion command, she was selected as the Academic Year 2016 Marine Corps Fellow to the U.S. Agency for International Development.  Harris had multiple overseas assignments to include two deployments to Iraq and one to Afghanistan. Harris’ personal decorations include the Joint Meritorious Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal (5th Award), Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal (3rd Award).Born in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Harris has B.A in Psychology from Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2255 Referral Instructions Senate (RIS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2255

 To amend the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 to establish a new budget 
 point of order against any amendment, bill, or conference report that 
directs increased revenues from additional taxation of Social Security 
    or Railroad Retirement benefits to a fund other than the Social 
 Security trust fund or the Social Security Equivalent Benefit Account.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 30 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

  Mr. Gorton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the 
 Committees on the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions 
that if one committee reports, the other committee have thirty days to 
                        report or be discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 to establish a new budget 
 point of order against any amendment, bill, or conference report that 
directs increased revenues from additional taxation of Social Security 
    or Railroad Retirement benefits to a fund other than the Social 
 Security trust fund or the Social Security Equivalent Benefit Account.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Trust Fund 
Protection Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. POINT OF ORDER.

    Subtitle C of the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 is amended by 
adding at the end thereof the following:

``SEC. 13307. REVENUES FROM SOCIAL SECURITY TAXATION.

    ``(a) Point of Order.--It shall not be in order in either the House 
of Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill, joint 
resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report that--
            ``(1) would increase the aggregate tax liability on Social 
        Security benefits and does not deposit the revenue resulting 
        from such increase in the trust funds under title II of the 
        Social Security Act; or
            ``(2) would increase the aggregate tax liability of 
        Railroad Retirement Tier I benefits and does not deposit the 
        revenue resulting from such increase in the Social Security 
        Equivalent Benefit Account.
    ``(b) Supermajority.--This section may be waived or suspended in 
the Senate or the House of Representatives only by the affirmative vote 
of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative 
vote of three-fifths of the Members shall be required in the Senate or 
the House of Representatives to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the 
chair on a point of order raised under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Rutledge, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 673]—

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Neil Ross, J.), rendered May 3, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessels to South Korea (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessels to South Korea (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | -------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |        |        | 10,166 | 130,185 | 252,223 | 270,025
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 316,227 | 453,483 | 292,732 | 275,779 |        |        |        |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
to my knowledge that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or
"filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


Date:  November 14, 2002            Name:  /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton
                                           ---------------------
                                           Sheldon C. Fenton
                                    Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anibal Perez-Ramirez, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 673]

Appeal by *1152the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), rendered November 17, 2015, convicting him of assault in the first degree, attempted assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree (two counts), assault in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and menacing in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officials after he was advised of his *Miranda*rights *(see Miranda v Arizona,*384 US 436 [1966]; *cf. People v Williams,*62 NY2d 285, 289-290 [1984]; *People v Santos,*112 AD3d 757, 758 [2013]).

The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Carncross,*14 NY3d 319, 324-325 [2010]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the sentence imposed by the Supreme Court improperly penalized him for exercising his right to a jury trial, because he did not set forth the issue on the record at the time of sentencing *(see People v Hurley,*75 NY2d 887, 888 [1990]; *People v Busano,*141 AD3d 538, 542 [2016]). In any event, the fact that the sentence imposed after trial was greater than the sentence offered during plea negotiations does not, standing alone, establish that the defendant was punished for exercising his right to a trial *(see People v Pena,*50 NY2d 400, *1153411 [1980]; *People v Busano,*141 AD3d at 542). The sentence imposed, was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Balkin and Barros, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Price of Everett, MA Natural Gas LNG Imports From France (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Price of Everett, MA Natural Gas LNG Imports From France (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 8.35   | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 09-1411.

#### Daniel E. Stoltzfus, et ux., Petitioners v. PSR Kirkwood LLC, et al.

562 U.S. 832, 131 S. Ct. 118,

178 L. Ed. 2d 32,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6258.

October 4, 2010.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office, denied.