alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH COMPOSITE AUTOMOBILE RESEARCH, LTD.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         246,163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    243,096
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               490,054
<PP&E>                                       1,276,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                 201,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,595,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          582,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,886,404
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,595,515
<SALES>                                        160,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,000
<CGS>                                          192,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,494,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,524,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,525,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,525,406)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.39)
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-8278.

#### Jameson *v.*Beard, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per*curiam).
From: Deering, Teena M [mailto:TDeering@semprautilities.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 4:39 PM

To: Schoenberger, Richard (FAA); Rampulla, Thomas (FAA)

Cc: Cormier, Dallas; Asaro, Christine

Subject: Amendment approval for SDG&E 

Richard and Tom,

We received our amendment approval today for our IE MkII Gen 3’s. This means we no longer need to go 

through the 8130 process.

I appreciate all of your help and patience with us as we pursued both avenues for us to get in the air.

Thank you! Keep up all of the hard work you guys have been great!

Teena

Teena Deering

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Program Lead 

(619) 829-4739

TDeering@semprautilities.com
# Bagram staff remembers fallen comrade

/ Published June 8, 2020
BAGRAM, Afghanistan, 
Defense Logistics Agency personnel in Afghanistan took time to remember a colleague lost in a rocket attack five years ago.

Krissie Davis was deployed from regular duties at DLA Disposition Services’ site at Anniston, Alabama, when rockets struck the vehicle that was taking her to breakfast June 8, 2015, at Bagram’s dining facility. It was her second voluntary deployment.

DLA Disposition Services Director Mike Cannon sent a message to the workforce describing Davis as “a beloved teammate” as he shared information on the brief ceremony to remember Davis. Accompanying the message were pictures and highlights from the anniversary event held by the memorial display at Bagram that honor’s Davis’ sacrifice provided by Army Lt. Col. Ryan Mendenhall, officer-in-charge for DLA Disposition Services in Afghanistan.

“One picture is of us flying the flag on Memorial Day in her honor,” Mendenhall said. “Another ... is of me telling the team this morning on what happened this day five years ago along with reading the certificate. I also said a prayer with the team on her behalf and all those who paid the ultimate sacrifice.”

The flag and certificate from the memorials will be sent to the Anniston team to honor Davis. Other memorials of Davis include the dedication for a memorial plaque at DLA Disposition Services in Battle Creek, Michigan, and her 2016 induction into the DLA Hall of Fame. 

Davis gave three-decades of federal service that included jobs with the Bureau of Prisons and Department of the Army. Her DLA service began in 1993. Her first volunteer deployment came in 2010 when she offered to deploy in support of disposal operations at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, and Manas Air Base, Kyrgyzstan.

 In his message to the workforce, Cannon asked everyone to take time today to remember Davis and “reflect on the sacrifices of all who deploy for us.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE THIRD
QUARTER REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000065873
<NAME>                        ALLTEL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            36,999
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    939,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                      37,301
<INVENTORY>                                      112,558
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,170,939
<PP&E>                                         9,985,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,404,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                10,570,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,179,350
<BONDS>                                        3,812,688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              4,409
<PREFERRED>                                        9,102
<COMMON>                                         313,930
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,688,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  10,570,358
<SALES>                                          451,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,705,508
<CGS>                                            432,258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,570,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  90,520
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               209,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  955,237
<INCOME-TAX>                                     405,075
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              550,162
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     550,162
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.74





</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15350]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2836]


United States International Telecommunications Advisory 
Committee; Radiocommunication Sector; Study Group 4--Fixed Satellite 
Service; Meeting Notice

    The Department of State announces that the United States 
International Telecommunications Advisory Committee (ITAC), 
Radiocommunication Sector Study Group 4--Fixed Satellite Service will 
meet on June 11, 1998 from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., in Room 5951 at the 
Department of State, 2201 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20520.
    Study Group 4 studies and develops recommendations concerning 
systems and networks for fixed satellites and inter-satellite links in 
the fixed satellite service including associated tracking, telemetry 
and telecommand functions. This meeting will review Study Group 4 
international activities and began preparations for the October meeting 
of Study Group 4.
    Members of the General Public may attend these meetings and join in 
the discussions, subject to the instructions of the Chairman, David 
Weinreich.

    Note: If you wish to attend please send a fax to 202-647-7407 
not later than 24 hours before the scheduled meeting. On this fax, 
please include subject meeting, your name, social security number, 
and date of birth. One of the following valid photo ID's will be 
required for admittance: U.S. driver's license with your picture on 
it, U.S. passport, U.S. Government ID (company ID's are no longer 
accepted by Diplomatic Security). Enter from the ``C'' Street Main 
Lobby.

    Dated: May 28, 1998.
John T. Gilsenan,
Chairman, U.S. ITAC for ITU-Radiocommunication Sector.
[FR Doc. 98-15350 Filed 6-4-98; 3:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
May 9, 2014

CAAP-13-0003337

#### CD, In re

Affirmed
#### Larell Fowler et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[67 NYS3d 171]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered May 27, 2016, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution, and under 42 USC § 1983, and part of plaintiffs’ exces*513sive force and assault and battery claims, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no dispute that the vehicle being operated by plaintiff Fowler had illegal tint to its windows, making the initial stop legal *(see People v Robinson,*103 AD3d 421 [1st Dept 2013], *lv denied*20 NY3d 1103 [2013]). The odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle, in and of itself, provided probable cause to arrest plaintiffs and search the vehicle *(id.).*Moreover, the officers’ observations of a marijuana cigarette in plain view provided independent probable cause to search the vehicle *(see People v Cruz,*7 AD3d 335 [1st Dept 2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 671 [2004]). Plaintiffs’ denials are unsupported by the record, which contains the voucher paperwork for the marijuana cigarette located in the vehicle, as well as substantial amounts of other contraband located in false bottom soda cans *(see Shields v City of New York,*141 AD3d 421, 422 [1st Dept 2016]; *Cheeks v City of New York,*123 AD3d 532, 546 [1st Dept 2014]). Defendants’ showing of probable cause defeats plaintiffs’ claims of false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution *(see Martinez v City of Schenectady,*97 NY2d 78 [2001]; *Singer v Fulton County Sheriff,*63 F3d 110, 118 [2d Cir 1995], *cert denied*517 US 1189 [1996]), as well as the claims alleging assault and battery relating to the handcuffing of plaintiffs *(see Ostrander v State of New York,*289 AD2d 463 [2d Dept 2001]).

The motion court also properly dismissed plaintiffs’ claims pursuant to 42 USC § 1983. Plaintiffs’ allegations of individual participation in every action attributed to the group do not “allege particular facts indicating that each of the individual defendants [were] personally involved in the deprivation of . . . plaintiffs’ constitutional rights” *(Shelton v New York State Liq. Auth.,*61 AD3d 1145, 1148 [3d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks, emphasis and brackets omitted]). In particular, plaintiffs’ allegations of joint and several liability are legally insufficient, as there is no vicarious liability between individual police officers in a section 1983 claim *(see Smith v Michigan,*256 F Supp 2d 704, 712 [ED Mich 2003]; *see also Higgins v City of New York,*144 AD3d 511, 515 [1st Dept 2016]).

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Kahn, Gesmer, Kern and Moulton, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Technology Development Group
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements and other financial information
included in this annual report fairly present in all material respects the consolidated
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the company and have:(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Omitted pursuant to the guidance of Releases Nos. 33-8238 (May 27, 2003), 33-8392
(February 24, 2004), 33-8545 (March 2, 2005) and 33-8760 (December 15, 2006);(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal
control over financial reporting; and5.
    
    The companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):(a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the companys internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/ Kang Li

Name: Kang LiTitle:  Acting Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary
# DLA 60th Anniversary Shout Out: Brig. Gen. Keith D. Reventlow, USMC, Commander, DLA Distribution

/ Published Sept. 20, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
00:10VIDEO  | 00:10 |DLA 60th Anniversary Shout Out: BG Keith D. Reventlow, USMC, Commander, DLA Distribution

BG Keith D. Reventlow, USMC, Commander, DLA Distribution, sends a shout out to DLA for the 60th Anniversary.
# New nationwide DOD surplus personal property sales contracts tentatively awarded

/ Published March 10, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Two Defense Department Surplus Term Sale contracts were tentatively awarded during a live bid opening held at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center in Battle Creek, Michigan, March 4.

The contracts cover all surplus personal property approved for public release by the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services throughout the continental U.S. and its territories Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. According to Lead Sales Contracting Officer Erica Nowicki, the contracts could return an estimated $38 million annually to DLA Disposition Services, based on historical pre-pandemic data averages. The contract length is set for an initial two-year term, followed by three optional extension periods of one year each.

Property includes all eligible rolling and non-rolling stock, excluding hazardous material and scrap. The contract stipulates that the contract holder will pay the government a percentage of the Original Acquisition Cost for each item they receive. Iron Planet submitted bids for the minimum bid value and were announced as the Apparent High Bidder for both Defense Department Surplus Term Sale contracts.

Nowicki said the agency released a request for information to gauge industry receptiveness in June of 2020, followed by a pre-solicitation notice in November. The Request for Technical Proposals and draft Invitations for Bid were published Jan. 6. Interested firms had 30 days to respond with their technical proposals. Three responses were received per sale; however, a single qualified firm submitted a final bid for each contract. 

The event was DLA Disposition Services’ first dial-in and web-based live bid opening stream, versus its typical in-person contract award events. Just eight minutes after Commercial Public Sales Branch Chief Wayne Hayward raised the gavel to mark the official start of the auction, an apparent high bid was announced and the auction concluded.

“The intent was accomplished,” Nowicki said of the web-streamed auction. “Leadership and industry were able to observe from remote locations and we were able to adhere to pandemic restrictions and considerations.”

Nowicki said she expected the results to be posted to the command’s sales web page upon final award of the contracts. Screenings and vetting during the pre-award process vary in duration, but she estimated that the new Surplus Term Sales contracts could be awarded and implemented by June 2021.
# Iwakuni Marines train on repurposed fuselage

/ Published Aug. 18, 2021
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
A firefighting team in Japan recently wrung every remaining ounce of possible use out of a C2A Greyhound fuselage turned over to Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services as scrap early this year.  

The Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting, or ARFF team, requisitioned the airplane fuselage from DLA’s property disposal site in Iwakuni in March. According to Gunnery Sgt. Ben Warshaw, the senior non-commissioned officer for the firefighting team, the Greyhound suffered from an in-air mishap and crashed in the ocean. After salvage and an investigation period, the plane was partially cut up and handed over to DLA for ultimate disposal. Warshaw said reusing the aircraft for training was his idea.

"Over the years, ARFF has received aircraft at different duty stations that are still whole but no longer air worthy,” Warshaw said. “We can run drills on those aircraft but are unable to cut them up. We would always scrap cars to cut up as they are easier to acquire and dispose of. The use of this aircraft allows Marines to get real training and problem solve the scenario. I am not aware of another duty station that has same abilities that we have here. Most stateside places work with aircraft salvage yards to get this kind of training.”

Warshaw said there are real differences in preparing for a real-world emergency on a trainer versus preparing on the real thing.

“Our aircraft trainer that we have here to conduct live fire training also has a cut-in point,” he said. “Those points have steel cutout sheets that get replaced. They work, but they cut easier than it would be to cut on a real aircraft.”

The various training events with the Greyhound began in March. Warshaw said the training events began with simple lessons like tool familiarization and gaining confidence in cutting through the structure. As more and more of the structure was cut, the final drill involves simulation of a salvage and recovery operation ending at DLA’s scrap lot. 

DLA Disposition Services Iwakuni Site Manager Tracy Kyle called it a “win-win.” The agency regularly works with its military customers to repurpose unusable equipment as realistic training equipment for first responders, shipping containers for simulated cities and villages, and targets for warfighters to practice on at sea, in the air and on land.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Feliciano, Appellant.

[55 NYS3d 200]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Tandra L. Dawson, J.), rendered May 12, 2015, as amended June 15, 2015, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated family offense and criminal contempt in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of one to three years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the order of protection and remanding the matter for a new determination of the duration of the order, and otherwise affirmed.

The indictment, which charged defendant with aggravated family offense under Penal Law § 240.75 (1) and criminal contempt in the second degree under Penal Law § 215.50 (3), was not jurisdictionally defective. The indictment gave defendant fair notice of the charges against him *(see generally People v Cohen,*52 NY2d 584, 586 [1981]), including that the aggravated family offense charge was based on defendant’s commission of second-degree criminal contempt.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

As the People concede, the expiration date of the order of protection is erroneous because it was calculated without tak*580ing jail time credit into account *(see People v Jackson,*121 AD3d 434 [1st Dept 2014]).

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische and Kahn, JJ.