alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fuels management flight validates mission readiness through fuel receipt test

/ Published Jan. 30, 2020
RAF MILDENHALL, England, 
The 100th Logistics Readiness Squadron fuels management flight verified alternative fuel receipt capabilities Jan. 27, 2020, at RAF Mildenhall, England.The operation was performed to verify that mission readiness could be maintained in the event the pipeline normally used to receive fuel was compromised.“It’s a different method of receiving fuel from off base,” said Staff Sgt. Manuel Cienfuegos, 100th LRS noncommissioned officer in charge of fuels laboratory. “We typically receive it through a pipeline, but we’re testing our ability to receive the fuel via alternate means.”Whether it is delivered by pipeline or truck, the fuel received, known as Jet Propellant 8, serves an essential role in the mission. In addition to the JP-8 being used in aircraft on base, it will eventually make its way into the tanks of allied and partner nation aircraft across Europe and Africa.“Not only is our fuel affecting our home station aircraft, you know the C-130s, the CV-22s, the KC-135s,” Cienfuegos said. “We’re a tanker wing, so it’s also affecting everything the KC-135s touch in the USAFE-AFAFRICA theatre.”As part of the test, the fuel is first routed into a holding tank where fuels management Airmen perform flash point, conductivity and other measurements to ensure the fuel is clean, after which it is transferred to more permanent storage.“Whenever we receive new fuel or even do maintenance on our systems, we perform quality assurance checks on all of our facilities, our equipment and receipts, which are the shipments of fuel,” Cienfuegos said. “We do that to make sure it’s all in regulation and it’s clean fuel we’re distributing to our aircraft and ground vehicles.”By demonstrating their ability to receive fuel, regardless of the method, the 100th LRS fuels management flight contributes to ensuring the Bloody Hundredth is capable of delivering aerial refueling capability at a moment’s notice throughout Europe and Africa.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Royal Air Force Mildenhall website.*
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2155

To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal share of the cost

of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Mr. HATFIELD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To authorize the appropriation of funds for the Federal

share of the cost of the construction of a Forest Ecosystem Research Laboratory at Oregon State University

in Corvallis, Oregon, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Forest Ecosystem Re5 search Laboratory Authorization Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. FOREST ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the availability of

8 funds appropriated under subsection (c), the Secretary of
2

•S 2155 IS

1 Agriculture, acting through the Cooperative State Re2 search Service, shall provide the Federal share of the cost

3 of planning and constructing a Forest Ecosystem Re4 search Laboratory at Oregon State University in Corvallis,

5 Oregon.

6 (b) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share provided

7 under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.

8 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

9 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section

10 $10,000,000, to remain available until expended.

Æ
#### Com. v. Reymoseo

03/23/2016

684 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 493
# “Get Out Challenge” keeps employees active, connected

/ Published May 28, 2020
RICHMOND, VA, 
Virtual workouts, picking strawberries, mountain walks and volunteering at a local food bank are activities McKesia Hester said took place during the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Strategic Acquisition Programs Directorate’s "Get Out Challenge."

Hester, a contracting specialist within the directorate’s Strategic Contracting Division III, said the directorate’s culture climate group came up with the concept as a means to get the employees collectively involved, connected, motivated and active during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

You may recall, this is the same group that had their favorite recipes complied into a virtual cookbook.

"This was an effort challenging those in the directorate to get outside, relieve stress and promote both mental and physical health wellness with the hopes this would become a part of our daily lifestyles," she said.

The challenge, which implemented the social pillar of DLA’s resiliency model during COVID-19, was broken up into two increments, Apr. 20 - May 1 and May 4 - 15. Members were encouraged to share photos and a short synopsis of their adventures. Forty people provided two photos each during the challenge.

Hester said she found time to stay fit by working out with her personal trainer virtually, while Contract Specialist Kenya Allamby said she went strawberry picking at a farm in Richmond.

"I am always up for a challenge. Whenever I hear the word challenge, I get motivated! Because I am doing activities by myself or with family, which can get boring, this activity gave me resilience to keep moving and helped me feel connected to team members," Allamby said.

Management Assistant Heather Groff said she used her challenge time to spruce up the flowerbed in front of her house. She also teleworked in the fresh air when the weather permitted. 

"I thought this would be a great idea. It allowed us to see what our co-workers are doing, maybe learn something about them, get some great ideas or just share good fun," Groff said.

Randy Dortch, deputy director for the Strategic Acquisition Programs Directorate, said he couldn’t be prouder of how his people are remaining resilient during these trying times. 

"I’m excited at the resiliency of the workforce to maintain and enhance culture in a virtual environment," he said.
*February 9, 2018*

2018-Ohio-504.]

2017-1744.

#### Hisle v. Yates.

In Procedendo. On relator’s application for dismissal. Application granted. Cause dismissed.
#### Carmack v. W.C.A.B. (PJ Dick, Inc./Trumbull Corp.)

08/16/2016

144 WAL (2016)

Denied
#### A.C., an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Naminata C., et al., Appellants, v Festus F. Ajisogun, Respondent.

[60 NYS3d 816]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson *416Jr., J.), entered July 7, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

“A driver in an area where children are playing need not exercise ‘extreme care or caution,’ although [he] must exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise under the circumstances” *(DeJesus v Alba,*63 AD3d 460, 463 [1st Dept 2009], *affd*14 NY3d 860 [2010]). Here, defendant established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by producing evidence that he was not speeding, driving only about 5-10 miles per hour, and that the infant plaintiff ran out from between two parked cars into the side of his vehicle *(see Fatumata B. v Pioneer Transp. Corp.,*118 AD3d 486, 486 [1st Dept 2014]; *DeJesus,*63 AD3d at 463; *Yahya v Kahan,*136 AD3d 644, 645 [2d Dept 2016]).

No issues of fact exist as to whether defendant’s speed was excessive under the circumstances *(see DeJesus,*63 AD3d at 464; *Fatumata B.,*118 AD3d at 487). Contrary to plaintiffs’ argument, *Ferrer v Harris*(55 NY2d 285 [1982]) does not stand for the broad proposition that a driver’s negligence is always a question of fact when the driver was aware that children were possibly present. Plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant ought to have seen the infant plaintiff before the impact. Accordingly, the point of impact was not a material issue of fact warranting denial of summary judgment *(see Hinkle v Trejo,*89 AD3d 631 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*19 NY3d 807 [2012]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
#### Com. v. Motter

11/02/2015

205 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 387
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7206
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES HUTSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-130-F, CA-96-274-F) Submitted: September 30, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996 Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Hutson, Appellant Pro Se. John Eric Evenson, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles Hutson appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hutson , Nos. CR-94-130-F; CA-96-274-F (E.D.N.C. July 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appellant`s motion for remand is denied.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan’s Foods, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of November 4, 2007, based on such evaluation; and   c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):   a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: December 19, 2007 /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir   Leonard R. Stein-Sapir,   Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer  
16
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricardo Rivas, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 867]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LoPresto, J.), imposed January 14, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

We agree with the defendant that the purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid *(see People v Guarchaj,*122 AD3d 878 [2014]; *People v Pelaez,*100 AD3d 803 [2012]).

However, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People*
      *548
      *v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Settles, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 816]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered May 29, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea after a suitable inquiry at which defendant received a sufficient opportunity to present his contentions *(see People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The court properly relied on its recollection of the plea proceedings and correctly rejected defendant’s claim that the voluntariness of his plea was impaired by the medication he was taking *(see People v Alexander,*97 NY2d 482 [2002]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
### Fw: USGS Data From Forest Service Uses ::: parts per trillion level.......Fw: POCIS pesticide sampling Jack Faulk to: Jordan Page, Virginia Garelick, Jennifer Chan, Allison Wiedeman, Marietta Echeverria 10/16/2009 04:04 PM
fyi... Jack

Water Permits Division US Environmental Protection Agency EPA East (4203M) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Telephone (202) 564-0768 Fax (202) 564-6431 ----- Forwarded by Jack Faulk/DC/USEPA/US on 10/16/2009 04:01 PM -----

From: Teung.F.Chin@aphis.usda.gov To: Jack Faulk/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Harold.Coble@ars.usda.gov, Benjamin.Smallwood@usda.gov, glenn.carpenter@wdc.usda.gov, Alan.V.Tasker@aphis.usda.gov, Linda.Abbott@usda.gov, Robert.M.Baca@aphis.usda.gov, sotoole@aphis.usda.gov, Charles.L.Brown@aphis.usda.gov, Samantha.B.Floyd@aphis.usda.gov, Stephanie.H.Stephens@usda.gov, Arnet Jones/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sally.Schneider@ars.usda.gov, Daniel.Strickman@ARS.USDA.GOV Date: 10/02/2009 03:57 PM Subject: USGS Data From Forest Service Uses::: parts per trillion level.......Fw: POCIS pesticide sampling

Jack: I am forwarding a USGS memo on a study assessing a new analytical approach to assess herbicide risk to bull trout. Table 11 lists the observed herbicide concentrations in the test stream following applications in five national forests in 2007 and 2008. The observed concentrations were at very low levels, even parts per trillion, as a result of the IPM-approach emplyed by the Forest Service. The new analytical method closely matched those of coventional analytical techniques. Teung

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or comments. Best regards,Teun g

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Teung F. Chin, Ph.D. Acting Director Office of Pest Management Policy Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture LOCATED AT: 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. Room 3871 - South Bldg. Mail Stop 0315 Washington DC, 20250-0315 Phone (202) 720-5375 Fax (202) 720-3191 Teung.F.Chin@usda.gov http://www.ars.usda.gov/opmp

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

----- Forwarded by Teung F Chin/MD/APHIS/USDA on 10/02/2009 03:42 PM ----- "scovell@fs.fed.us" <scovell@fs.fed.us>

10/01/2009 12:19 PM To "Teung.F.Chin@aphis.usda.gov" <Teung.F.Chin@aphis.usda.gov> cc Subject POCIS pesticide sampling

Teung: Attached for forwarding to EPA, as you see fit, is USGS paper which includes some sample results of POCIS pesticide sampling:

See, especially, Table 11.
V/R Steve

Stephen A. Covell, A.I.C.P. Biological Scientist / Program Manager USFS Pesticides and State and Private Forestry Invasive Plants USDA / Forest Service / Forest Health Protection RPC-7 1601 North Kent Street Arlington, VA 22209 Tel: 703-605-5342 FAX: 703-605-5353e-mail: scovell @ fs.fed.us

web site: www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth
*June 2, 2017*

2017-Ohio-4089.]

2015-1074.

#### State ex rel. Ohio Presbyterian Retirement Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 14AP-624, 2015-Ohio-2122. On the motion of amici curiae Ohio Association for Justice and Ohio Association of Claimants’ Counsel to participate in oral argument scheduled for June 7, 2017. Motion granted. Amici curiae shall share the time allotted to appellees.
# What the holidays mean to me: Margaret "Rose" Waller

/ Published Dec. 23, 2020
RICHMOND, VA, 
*During the month of December, DLA Aviation Public Affairs will be running a special series of stories titled “What the holidays mean to me.” The purpose is to spotlight members of the DLA Aviation workforce during the holidays.*

**Name:** Margaret "Rose" Waller

**Organization:** DLA Aviation at Warner Robins, Georgia

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?** I’m a customer support specialist. I help provide support to the Air Force C-130 Hercules production depot maintenance line. I monitor parts status and urgency of assets needed for maintenance. I also prepare and submit emergency buy packages, breach of stock, lateral support and mission impaired capability awaiting parts [requests] in support of the warfighter.

**What do the holidays mean to you?**Holidays mean love to me. This is the time of year we show love for family and friends and to celebrate the birth of Jesus one to another.

**What are your fondest holiday memories?** I come from a military family, so my fondest memories were when each of my four siblings and myself took leave and went home for Christmas with our families. It was like a huge slumber party.  

**What is your favorite holiday tradition?**Christmas morning bingo. We stayed in our pajamas all morning, cooked a lot of food and played bingo.

**Name your favorite holiday song and why it’s your favorite.**My favorite holiday song is Mariah Carey’s “All I want for Christmas is You.” The words tell it all. I don’t want a lot for Christmas. I just want you. Since we were all military, we just wanted to be together at this festive time of year.
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Price of Sasabe, AZ Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Price of Sasabe, AZ Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | --     | 4.62   | 2.73   | 2.44   | 2.70   | 2.07   | 1.13  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.33   | 5.95   | 5.53   | 3.32   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

May 18, 2010 

via email and regulations.gov 

Esta Rosenberg 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc. for an exemption 

 under 49 U.S.C. § 40109 (Minneapolis/St. Paul-Mexico City) 

 Docket DOT-OST-2010-0133 

 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, Delta urges that 

the application be granted as soon as possible. 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: Jeff Gaynes 

Brian Hedberg 

 Thuy Cooper 

 Mike Orr, Airline Info