alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Jacksonville’s Gist recognized at annual DLA award ceremony

/ Published Feb. 5, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., Kevin Gist, a motor vehicle operator at DLA Distribution Jacksonville at Gulfport, Mississippi, was recognized as one of DLA’s 10 Outstanding Personnel of the Year award at the 51st annual employee recognition ceremony Dec. 13 for his innovative load planning. 
Gist serves in transportation load planning, physical loading using Material Handling Equipment (MHE), and local deliveries.  He also routinely assists with re-warehousing, packing operations, Preservation, Packaging, Packing, and Marking, and receiving.  

According to DLA Distribution Jacksonville, Florida, director Charles Crumb, Gist’s top priority is always customer service.  “It could be a local customer, or a unit deployed overseas--Mr. Gist always prioritizes getting the shipment moving.  He has pride in his work and does whatever it takes to get the material in the hands of the customer.  His dedication and diligence enabled the enterprise to provide unparalleled support to the Warfighter not only in the Southeast region, but all over the globe.”

One of Gist’s most significant achievements is innovative load planning.  At Naval Construction Battalion Gulfport, Mississippi, a number of various sizes and unconventionally shaped construction materials are moved together.  

For example, electrical concrete pull boxes weighing over 2,000 pounds each, several bundles of tapered 26 foot light poles, tri-walls with electrical equipment, and bundles of PVC pipe were all load planned perfectly for shipment overseas. All of these items would be considered very difficult to move together because of the odd shapes and weights of the individual items.  

Gist expertly planned the shipments for the least amount of vehicles and safe loading, and then proceeded to operate the MHE as planned for a successful outcome, resulting in the construction materials arriving on time in Rota, Spain.

Gist also provided valuable input into workflow processes and warehouse layout resulting in a 10 percent reduction in shipment processing time. He identified the MHE flow from the staging area for local delivery to the loading dock. This resulted in a change of the staging area to make a shorter and safer distance for the MHE to travel.  

“Mr. Gist has always dedicated himself to the mission and the Warfighters and is regularly commended by the customers, reflecting tremendous credit upon the whole organization.  He consistently performs in an exemplary manner and focuses on superior customer service and selflessly contributes to the team.  His creative thinking and consideration of factors from beginning to end, and excellent MHE skills with no safety mishaps, makes him an outstanding employee and a great asset for DLA Distribution,” said Crumb.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgans Foods, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: July 9, 2008
    /s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-SapirChairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer 15
#### Rui Qin Chen Juan et al., Appellants, v 213 West 28 LLC, Respondent.

[53 NYS3d 28]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo S. Hagler, J.), entered on or about July 19, 2016, which, among other things, denied plaintiffs’* motion for a *Yellowstone*injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly denied the tenant plaintiffs’ motion for a *Yellowstone*injunction because the sole source of support for the motion was the English language affidavit of the non-English-speaking Rui Qin Chen Juan, which is inadmissible for want of a translator’s affidavit, as is required by CPLR 2102 (b) and rule 14 (a) of the New York County Supreme Court, Civil Branch, Rules of Justices. Thus, plaintiffs have provided no factual support for the motion.

Even were we to consider the affidavit, defendant’s argu*540ments fall on the merits. Plaintiffs were clearly in default regarding provisions in the lease requiring insurance coverage. Most significantly, they failed to obtain continuous insurance coverage for the entire lease term *(see Graubard Mollen Horowitz Pomeranz & Shapiro v 600 Third Ave. Assoc.,*93 NY2d 508, 514 [1999]). It is undisputed that there were two gaps in insurance coverage. The failure to obtain insurance is a material breach that may not be cured by the purchase of prospective insurance, as such insurance “does not protect defendant [owner] against the unknown universe of any claims arising during the period of no insurance coverage” *(Kyung Sik Kim v Idylwood, N.Y., LLC,*66 AD3d 528, 529 [1st Dept 2009]; *accord 117-119 Leasing Corp. v Reliable Wool Stock, LLC,*139 AD3d 420, 421 [1st Dept 2016]). Nor was defendant obligated to exercise its option of securing insurance on plaintiffs’ behalf *(see Jackson 37 Co., LLC v Laumat, LLC,*31 AD3d 609, 610 [2d Dept 2006]).

Plaintiffs cannot complain that they were not granted an ev-identiary hearing, since no such hearing was ever requested. In any event, plaintiffs have not shown that any additional evidence could change the result.

We have considered the parties’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/07/2011 09:27 AM 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on NESHAPS from Coal- and Oil-Fired 

Electric Utility Steam Generating Units; and Greenhouse Gas NSPS for 

Electric Generating Units Rules 

Hi, 

Attached are the handouts from yesterday’s meeting. Please let me know 

if you have any questions. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on NESHAPS from Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric 

Utility Steam Generating Units; and Greenhouse Gas NSPS for Electric 

Generating Units Rules 

When: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern 

Time (US & Canada). 

Where: Room 10103 NEOB 

 

 

This meeting was requested by Rae Cronmiller, NRECA.
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | --     | 13.45  | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | 4.73  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4.76   | W      | 13.83  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
497 P.2d 844

#### The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. James Edward CHRISHON, Appellant.

No. 1 CA-CR 338.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

June 8, 1972.

Rehearing Denied July 5, 1972.

*338Gary K. Nelson, The Atty. Gen., by Mary Z. Chandler, Asst Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.

Ross P. Lee, Public Defender, by Anne Kappes, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, for appellant.

EUBANK, Judge.

This is another Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969) appeal, which claims that appellant’s change of plea from “not guilty” to “guilty” was invalid because the trial court failed to advise the defendant of the elements of the charge against him prior to accepting the change of plea. No other claim of error is made.

The same claim was made and rejected in Division Two of this Court in State v. Moreno, 16 Ariz.App. 191, 492 P.2d 440 (1972). We adopt the reasoning in Moreno and hold that the trial court need not advise the appellant of the elements of the crime that he is charged with. It is enough if the record shows that the trial court established a sufficient “factual basis” of the defendant’s guilt. Our review of the record here shows that he was arrested while in the act of moving some of the stolen tires by pickup truck and that he admitted that he was guilty of the attempted burglary of the tire company building located at 1810 East Washington in the city of Phoenix.

It is our opinion that the record contains an ample “factual basis” to comply with Boykin. *See*North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); State v. Hooper, 107 Ariz. 327, 487 P.2d 394 (1971); State v. Sullivan, 107 Ariz. 98, 482 P.2d 861 (1971).

Judgment is affirmed.

HAIRE, Chief Judge, Division 1, and GERALD J. STRICK, Superior Court Judge, concur.

NOTE: Judge EINO M. JACOBSON having requested that he be relieved from consideration of this matter, Judge GERALD J. STRICK was called to sit in his stead and participate in the determination of this decision.
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     I, Kenneth L. Hignett, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andSecretary of Morgan’s Foods, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(3) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the periodended November 7, 2004 (the “Report”), which this certificationaccompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.   Dated: December 22, 2004 /s/ Kenneth L. Hignett   Kenneth L. Hignett, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
22
# Former Marine remembers, pays tribute to those far from home during the holidays

/ Published Dec. 23, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Paul Smith knows firsthand what it’s like to be away from family and friends during the holidays. As a retired Marine Corps officer and current Defense Logistics Agency civilian employee, Smith has deployed to combat zones both in and out of uniform. 

“It’s always hard to be away for Christmas,” Smith says. “When I was deployed to Iraq back in 2003 my mother sent me a small Christmas tree. Nobody else there had one, so everybody always gathered around my pod just to see the tree. We’d sing Christmas carols and try to make the best of our situation. Since then I’ve tried to show my support the best way I could.”

As an equipment program manager with DLA Distribution Current Operations, Smith decided this year’s tribute to those deployed in harm’s way would be in the form a patriotic display in the third-floor lobby of the organization’s New Cumberland headquarters. There he and his co-workers created a display that includes an artificial holiday tree, miniature flags representing all military service branches and lights to set the whole thing off.

“I came up with the concept of having a red, white and blue celebration of Christmas,” he says. “If you look under the Christmas tree we have all the boots of everybody that deployed in J3. We have the Army, the Navy, Air Force and Marines to include a pair of my boots when I was in Iraq in 1990. DLA is about warfighter first and being able to do something for the troops is very important to me.”

Smith says that, while many Americans spend well-deserved time at home with their families during the holiday season, it’s important to remember that there are still thousands of service members not able to do so.

“One of our contractors has a husband deployed to Iraq right now,” Smith says. “She was able to put a couple ornaments on the tree as a tribute to her husband, then sent a photo to him so he and his co-workers know that we’re thinking about them. It’s not a lot, but it’s our way of saying your DLA family is thinking about you.”

To watch a video of this story, click here: https://dvidshub.net/r/lpumlk
# Employee makes hundreds of cloth facemasks for coworkers

/ Published July 30, 2020
RICHMOND, Va., 
While adjusting to telework and the new virtual workplace during the ongoing pandemic, one member of Defense Logistics Agency Aviation found a way to help others.

Charlotte Bell, an American Sign Language interpreter and equal employment opportunity specialist, made facemasks for coworkers while off duty. Recognizing that masks would become a mainstay in preventing virus spread, she believed disposable masks might soon be hard to come by.

“That's when I started researching making a cloth mask that could be laundered and reused to save money. Making them for the workforce just kind of evolved out of the friendships I've made here at DLA,” she said.

Bell has been sewing since childhood.

“When I was nine, my mom taught me how to make a pillowcase and how to hem,” she said, adding that she learned to use a sewing machine as she grew older.

Bell began making masks for friends and loved ones who didn’t have crafting skills or a sewing machine. She ultimately made about 500 masks, delivering them by mail and what she refers to as “drive and drops.”

“I delivered them by mailing them out or by driving to the individual locations and dropping them off,” she said. “It was fun seeing where everyone lived. I enjoyed getting out and seeing all of the smiling faces.”

DLA Aviation Deputy Commander Charlie Lilli rewarded Bell’s kindness by presenting her with a commemorative coin when she returned to the office. While many have thanked her, Bell said she was happy to help others.

“It’s nice to know you can help others even if it's not on a big scale or with a huge event. The smallest gesture of kindness can make a difference in someone’s life and perhaps help them when they need it most,” she said, adding that she was taught to be kind to others.

“My momma, who recently passed away – not from COVID-19 – would be proud,” Bell said.
#### Com. v. Handlovic

03/23/2016

928 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 485
# Subsistence, USDA partnership sets new high for schools receiving fresh produce 

/ Published Oct. 22, 2019
PHILADELPHIA, 
When the Department of Defense Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program started in 1995, school districts in only eight states signed on with the partnership effort. By the end of fiscal 2019, the DOD Fresh program has grown to include districts nationwide, reaching record numbers of participants at the start of this school year.The number of schools participating in the DOD Fresh program increased from 21,000 to 45,000 since the 2017 school year, said Patricia Scott, Subsistence Garrison Feeding Division chief said.The program, a U.S. Department of Agriculture and Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support partnership effort supporting the USDA’s National School Lunch program, provides weekly deliveries of nutritious fresh fruits and vegetables to school children.“Last week alone we supported 20,000 deliveries ... our historic high for one week,” she said.Joseph Hauser, Subsistence Produce and Market Fresh division chief, said his contracting team has a unique role in supporting the partnership which has outpaced orders for military support.“When my team seeks vendors for an area, they solicit requirements for troops eating in [military] dining facilities as well as the schools,” he said. “The school program has grown so much that the dollar value and the number of contracts is higher than it is for troops.”Thanks to the DOD Fresh program, each week children in 11,000 school districts across the country receive fresh fruits and vegetables.“Partnering with the USDA to provide a variety of fresh produce to school-aged children through the DoD Fresh Program not only demonstrates DLA Troop Support’s commitment to provide quality food to the warfighter but extends to their children in schools across the country,” Army Brig. Gen. Gavin Lawrence, DLA Troop Support commander, said. “We are so grateful to support this effort and the great work that USDA is doing through this initiative.”Kathleen Staley, USDA Program Integrity and Monitoring Branch chief, said the program has continued to grow as the schools’ demand for fresh fruits and vegetables increase.“In 1995, when schools in the National School Lunch Program began to order and receive fresh produce [through DOD Fresh], the schools received produce worth $3.2 million,” she said. “In school year 2018-2019, over 45,000 schools in 48 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and Guam ordered and received produce worth $272 million.”Scott said that a significant portion of the program’s growth is attributable to word-of-mouth recommendations between school districts in regard to the value, timeliness and support provided by Subsistence and their USDA partners.Alice Bennett, the director of nutrition services for the Sayre area school district in Northeast Pennsylvania, loves the DOD Fresh program.“While we appreciate all the government commodities we are offered,” Bennett said. “The DOD items are those items we really choose to focus on in our lunch program.”
The a pplication was filed by

Michae l J oseph Ke arns pur porting to act as Arnold Garza’s 1 next friend. Nothing in the r ecor d prese nted author i z es Kearns to ac t as Garza’s next friend. See Saldarriaga v. Saldarriaga , 121 S.W .3d 493, 498-99 (Tex
. App.—Austin 2003, no pet.) (“I t is lega l err or to conc lude from r

ule 44 that an attorney

may step in as next friend for

a g rown woma

n in the mid dle of a laws uit wi tho ut a fo rm a l a dju dic atio n of inc a pa c ity
. . . . We f

ind it i nc on g ru ou s th at a next friend would have the same rig hts as a guardia n but not be bound by

t h e s am e p ro ce du re f

or appointment.”). Howeve r, habeas petiti ons may be pre sented by someone other

than the applica

nt on the applicant’s behalf

. See Te x. Cod e Cr im. Pr oc . Ann. art . 1 1. 12 , 1 1. 13 (We st 2 00 5) . We no te that this Court has held that, although a n individual can sig n and pre sent the petiti o n s ee k i n gthe fre edom of a

nother, he would need the ai d o f an at t orney to appea r in court on be half of a

nother. Drew v. Unauthorized Prac tice of Law Committ ee , 970 S.W .2d 152, 156 (Tex. App.—Austin 1998, pet. denied)
. 

### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03- 10 -00 154 -CR

In re Ar nold Gar za

ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N
A r n o ld G ar za ha s f

ile d a n o ri g ina l App licati on fo r Wr it o f H a be a s Co rp us in t

his 1 Court. He seeks relief from an order of commi tment arising out of a criminal case. This Court does
no th av e th e p o w e r

t o c o n s i d e r

o r i g i n a l a

p p l i c at i o n s f

o r w r i t s o f h a b e a s c o r p u s i nc r i m i n a l c a s e s. SeeTe x. Cod e Cr im. Pr oc . A nn . a rt 11 .0 5 ( Wes t 20 05 ); see also Tex. Const. art. V, § 5(c) (cour t of criminal appe als shall have t h e p o we r to issue the writ of habe as cor pus). This Court’s orig inal jur isd ic tio n to issu e a wr it of ha be a s cor pu s is lim ite d to thos e c a se s in wh ic h a pe rs on ’s lib e rt

y is restra ined bec au s e the per son has violated an or der, judg ment, or dec ree enter ed in a c ivil case.2

SeeTe x. Go v’ t Co de Ann. § 2 2. 22 1( d) (We st 2 00 4) ; Do ds on v . S tate , 98 8 S.W .2d 833, 835 (T e x. Ap p. —S an Ant onio 1 99 9, no pe t.) ; Ex parte Hawk ins , 885 S.W .2d 586, 588 (T e x. Ap p. —E l Pa so 19 94 , o ri g . p ro c e e din g ); Nor ris v . S tate , 630 S.W .2d 362, 3 64 (Tex. App.—Houston [1s t Dist.] 1982, no writ). B eca use Ga rza’s application a

rises from an orde r enter ed in a c riminal case , not a civil case , we have no jurisdiction to consider it.

This Application for Writ of Habe as Corpus is dismis sed for want of jurisdiction.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Mar ch 26, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh