alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DLA’s mission evolves with DoD needs
 
  By Colin Williams, DLA Historian
  The Defense Logistics Agency has grown in scope and responsibility since its founding in 1961. While need and proven capabilities have driven DLA to expand overseas, assume retail operations and serve as one of the nation’s go-to agencies in responses to natural disasters, not every mission the agency has acquired over its 58 years of existence remains with it. One of the most significant missions initially undertaken by the agency was the Defense Traffic Management Service. DTMS came to the Defense Supply Agency in 1962 from the Army. Charged with moving service members traveling within the continental United States in groups of 25 or more, it also transported freight in quantities of at least 10,000 pounds by ground or 1,000 pounds by air. While usually employed for training purposes, DTMS helped the nation respond to the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962, one year after DSA’s founding. Because DTMS was land-centric, the Pentagon returned it to the Army in 1964. During its short stay in DSA, DTMS became responsible for moving household goods of service members moving to new duty stations. Also during its time with DSA, DTMS began using computers to calculate shipping costs rather than computing them by hand. Even more fundamental to DLA operations was Contract Administration Services. Formed under DLA in 1964 as a separate entity with its own regional offices and two-star commander, CAS added approximately 20,000 workers to the agency. CAS had such a different mission from the rest of DLA that DoD separated it completely in 1990. It is now the Defense Contract Management Agency at Fort Lee, Virginia. A smaller but still significant change to DLA was the Defense Document Center. Formed as the Air Documents Research Center during World War II, this organization translated and analyzed captured German documents. It underwent several mission and name changes before landing with DSA in 1963. Cut from the agency in 1991, it became the Defense Technical Information Center, an independent field activity collocated with DLA at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Other transfers out of DLA were less significant. At various times, the agency gave the Government Services Administration control of federal supply classes. Over the years, however, DLA acquired more items from federal entities than it lost. Like DTMS, the Defense Automotive Supply Center came to DSA from the Army. Near the end of his command, Army Lt. Gen. Andrew T. McNamara shuttered the Detroit-based center and returned it to the Army, eliminating half of its missions and folding the rest into Defense Supply Center Columbus, now DLA Land and Maritime. DLA’s historical relationships show how important it is to DoD and the nation. While some missions have come and gone from the agency, DLA gained three or four new missions for each one it lost. It has become the largest of the Department of Defense’s 20 agencies and eight field activities, and is the nation’s only combat logistics agency.
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Michigan Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Michigan Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 3.91   | 4.01   | 3.81   | 3.91   | 2.86   | 2.59   | 2.96  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2.91   | 3.05   | 3.15   | 2.98   | 2.91   | 3.21   | 2.89   | 2.20   | 2.12   | 2.08  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2.10   | 2.16   | 2.19   | 2.30   | 2.37   | 2.28   | 2.23   | 2.14   | 2.09   | 2.06  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.88   | 1.89   | 1.97   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7587.

#### Concepcion *v.*Grounds, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2015016EN.01006601.xml

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 16/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 16/66

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1105/2010 of 29 November 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters originating in the People's Republic of China and terminating the proceeding concerning imports of high tenacity yarn of polyesters originating in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 315 of 1 December 2010
  )

On page 15, Annex, column ‘Company Name’:

for:

‘Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company’

read:

‘Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd’

---
#### Dietl, Matter of, v Board of Elections in the City of N.Y.

1st Dept: 151 AD3d 504

denied
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14053]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 10, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Karen L. Grandstrand, Vice 
President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, P.O. Box 291, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Norwest Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; to acquire 
Southwest Partners, Inc., San Diego, California, and thereby engage in 
mortgage lending activities, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(1) of 
Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 21, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-14053 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Cite as State ex rel. Goldsby v. Donnelly , 2013-Ohio-2921.] 

# Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99863



## STATE, EX REL., PHILLIP GOLDSBY

RELATOR

vs. 

## JUDGE MICHAEL P. DONNELLY

RESPONDENT



### JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED

Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 465360

Order No. 466033

RELEASE DATE: July 1, 2013FOR RELATOR Phillip Goldsby, pro se 13521 Rugby Ave. Cleveland, OH 44110

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 9th Floor, Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, OH 44113TIM McCORMACK, J.: {¶1} On May 3, 2013, the relator, Phillip Goldsby, commenced this procedendo action against the respondent, Judge Michael Donnelly, to compel the judge to issue final, appealable orders for two motions for jail-time credit that he filed on September 19, 2012, and March 22, 2013, in the underlying case, State v. Goldsby , Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-559356. He maintains that he is entitled to 86 days of jail-time credit. {¶2} On May 28, 2013, the respondent moved for summary judgment on the grounds of mootness. The docket of the underlying case shows that on March 5, 2013, the respondent judge resolved the September 19, 2012 motion by granting him 25 days of credit and, on April 5, 2013, resolved the March 22, 2013 motion by granting him a total of 27 days of credit. Moreover, attached to the dispositive motion was a certified copy of a journal entry, file-stamped May 15, 2013, in the underlying case, granting Goldsby a total of 71 days of credit. The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction’s website shows that Goldsby was released from prison on May 22, 2013. Goldsby never filed a response to the motion for summary judgment. Thus, Goldsby has received his requested relief, and this action is moot. State ex rel. Corder v. Wilson , 68 Ohio App.3d 567, 589 N.E.2d 113 (10th Dist.1991). {¶3} Additionally, the relator failed to support his complaint with an affidavit “specifying the details of the claim” as required by Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a). State ex rel. Leon v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 123 Ohio St.3d 124, 2009-Ohio-4688,914 N.E.2d 402; State ex rel. Wilson v. Calabrese , 8th Dist. No. 70077, 1996 Ohio App. LEXIS 6213 (Jan. 18, 1996). {¶4} Accordingly, the court grants the respondent’s motion for summary judgment and denies the writ. Costs assessed against the relator. This court directs the Clerk of the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).

TIM McCORMACK, JUDGE LARRY A. JONES, SR., P.J., and EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR
#### In the Matter of Chafik Hassane, Petitioner, v Chief Clerk of the New York County Supreme Court, Respondent.

[53 NYS3d 537]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
# Prepping for the survey  

/ Published Feb. 11, 2020
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
With just under two months remaining, the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Culture Action Team gathered in Battle Creek, Michigan, in late January to learn the ins and outs of the upcoming DLA culture/climate survey that launches March 17.

The CAT consists of representatives from Disposition Services field sites and headquarters operations. The members are the survey touchpoints and work with their leadership to answer questions. For the majority of the team this is the first time leading employees through the survey. Time was devoted to understanding how to interpret culture wheels and how the Denison Survey was developed.

Disposition Services Director Mike Cannon spent time with the team and highlighted key messages about the survey. He also talked in depth about network adjustments, metrics and changes regarding scrap removal.

Messages about the survey:

• Set aside time to take the survey and hold a team-building event. Your participation is key to the success.• It is confidential. Ten responses are needed to create a wheel and report.• Provide detailed comments. Explain why or how something is good or needs improvement.• Answer the survey based on your duty location as of Dec. 31. Employees who have changed offices or sites since Dec. 31 should base their responses on their December location.• You will not receive a survey if you started with DLA after Dec. 31.

DLA is holding a Survey Workshop Feb. 11 for sub-command Culture Champions and will provide updated materials including the 2020 Communication Plan, FAQs, a confidentiality sheet and posters.

If you have questions, email the DLA Disposition Services Culture Action Team.
# DLA employees share COVID-19 resilience messages

/ Published April 21, 2020
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
Since the coronavirus has resulted in state-mandated stay-at-home orders and widespread telework, Defense Logistics Agency employees are connecting with colleagues through a new video series available on DLA’s Facebook page and the DLA resiliency website.The “COVID-19 Messages of Resilience” series feature 1-2 minute videos of DLA employees throughout the enterprise offering messages of support, hope and resilience. As DLA employees navigate the unprecedented global event, the agency’s resilience model and its four pillars — mental, physical, social and spiritual — can help fortify employees’ work and life balance during periods of uncertainty.

Watch the resilience videos on DLA’s Facebook page or the DLA resiliency website.

DLA employees can submit a resilience message by contacting Nutan Chada at nutan.chada@dla.mil.
FILE 

JUN 2 8 2016 

ci_ IC LI DEMAN N

TIKt M

eI= 

(MM 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, 

F/KJA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS 

TRUSTEE FOR THE 

CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWALT, 

INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 

2006-0A7 MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 

2006-0A7, A/K/A BANK OF NEW YORK 

MELLON, F/K/A BANK OF NEW YORK, 

AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE 

REGISTERED HOLDERS OF 

ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006- 

0A7, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-0A7, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

TRP FUND IV, LLC, A NEVADA 

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, 

Respondent. 

No. 69879 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is an appeal from a district court order granting a motion 

for summary judgment in a quiet tide action. Respondent has filed a 

motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that the 

claims asserted in its third-party complaint against Isaac and Linda 

Szlamkowicz remain pending in the district court. Appellant does not 

dispute that these claims remain pending in the district court. Instead, 

appellant asserts that the district court entered an order to statistically 

close this case and that order constitutes a final judgment in this matter, 

after which it timely filed a notice of appeal. 

Respondent filed a third-party complaint against Isaac and 

Linda Szlamkowicz in the district court on September 28, 2015, and 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A i■a179. Lo- 2.0110 
Pickering 7 , J. 

Saitta 

J. 

served them with copies of the complaint. No district court order appears 

to resolve the third-party complaint. Accordingly, the claims against Isaac 

and Linda Szlamkowicz remain pending in the district court such that the 

order granting the motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment 

appealable pursuant to NEAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV, Corp., 116 Nev. 

424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000) (a final judgment is one that resolves all claims 

and issues against all parties and leaves nothing for the district court's 

future determination except for post-judgment issues); see also Taylor 

Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 

(1984) (this court may only consider appeals that are authorized by statute 

or court rule). And appellant's argument that the order statistically 

closing the case is a final adjudication of the case lacks merit. Brown v. 

MHC Stagecoach, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 37, 301 P.3d 850 (2013). Accordingly, 

we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal,' and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 2 

Alt J. 

Hardesty 

'Appellant may file a notice of appeal from any appealable order 

entered by the district court. 

2Given this order, we take no action on the parties' stipulation to 

stay the briefing schedule. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 19474 c(tig° 

2 

MAVIEMB11.1111111.11111 
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge 

Lansford W. Levitt, Settlement Judge 

Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas 

The Wright Law Group 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

3 

(0) 1947A e
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jaysen Dorsey, Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 818]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jill *417Konviser, J.), rendered September 15, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
DLA Distribution Oklahoma City keeps F-35 parts moving during COVID-19 pandemic
 
  By Jona Morrison, DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Training Coordinator
  Oklahomans have a long history of overcoming adversity, lending a helping hand to neighbors, and maintaining hope and resiliency in trying times. It’s what they proudly refer to as the “Oklahoma Standard.” The F-35 team at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, is demonstrating those standards by continuing to transfer in 50,000 part numbers from Pratt & Whitney, an effort scheduled to be completed by the end of fiscal 2020. Despite disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, the team has actually increased weekly transfers, said Cornell Greene, a DDOO project manager. “The steps employees are taking to ensure this mission-essential contract continues unabated include wearing gloves, masks, practicing good hygiene, social distancing, and true ingenuity and creativity with their DIY [do it yourself] face coverings,” she said. Employees from the DDOO Maintenance Department enhanced safety measures by designing, building and installing Plexiglas barriers in high-traffic work areas such as truck docks and the Transportation Assistant Office. “We have over-the-road truck drivers coming in and out of there all day picking up loads to take to other bases. They have to come into the Transportation Assistant Office to sign bills of lading, and we also have customers coming in all day from all over the base to bring material in to be shipped out,” said Transportation Officer Jabari Giles. DDOO has also minimized risks by stopping face-to-face meetings and expanding the use of Skype and email, as well as adjusting employee’s shifts and break times. And movement among the organization’s 60-plus buildings has been minimized. DLA Distribution Oklahoma City Director John Northrup praised employees for their dedication and work ethic. “As I speak with folks across the distribution center, we discuss the oath of office that we took as public servants – servants of the people,” he said, adding that his team takes pride in supporting warfighters. “Despite being scared and uncertain of the future, DDOO employees continue to report daily since the onset of COVID-19,” Northrup added. “They are willingly and collectively standing tall across multiple functions in support of warfighters all over the world. I am humbled and proud to be part of this fine team.”
# L_2011132EN.01000501.xml

| 19.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 132/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 132/5

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 May 2011

on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam on certain aspects of air services

(2011/285/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 100(2) in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 5 June 2003, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with an agreement at Union level. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 5 June 2003, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with an agreement at Union level.

| (2) | On behalf of the Union, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam on certain aspects of air services in accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Decision of 5 June 2003. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On behalf of the Union, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam on certain aspects of air services in accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Decision of 5 June 2003.

| (3) | The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its possible conclusion at a later date. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement was signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its possible conclusion at a later date.

| (4) | The Agreement should be approved accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Agreement should be approved accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam on certain aspects of air services (1) is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to make the notification provided for in Article 7(1) of the Agreement.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 12 May 2011.

For the Council

The President

PINTÉR S.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 288, 5.11.2010, p. 2.

1

---