alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1933

To repeal the Medicare and Medicaid Coverage Data Bank, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. MCCAIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To repeal the Medicare and Medicaid Coverage Data Bank,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MEDICARE AND MEDICAID COV4 ERAGE DATA BANK.

5 (a) REPEAL.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 13581 of the Omni7 bus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 is hereby

8 repealed.

9 (2) APPLICATION OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY

10 ACT.—The Social Security Act shall be applied and
2

•S 1933 IS

1 administered as if section 13581 of the Omnibus

2 Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (and the amend3 ments made by such section) had not been enacted.

4 (b) STUDY AND REPORT.—

5 (1) STUDY.—The Secretary of Health and

6 Human Services (hereafter in this subsection re7 ferred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall conduct a study

8 on how to achieve the objectives of the data bank de9 scribed in section 1144 of the Social Security Act

10 (as in effect on the day before the date of the enact11 ment of this Act) in the most cost-effective manner,

12 taking into account—

13 (A) the administrative burden of such data

14 bank on private sector entities and govern15 ments,

16 (B) the possible duplicative reporting re17 quirements of the Health Care Financing Ad18 ministration in effect on such date of enact19 ment, and

20 (C) the legal ability of such entities and

21 governments to acquire the required informa22 tion.

23 (2) REPORT.—The Secretary shall report to the

24 Congress on the results of the study described in
3

•S 1933 IS

1 paragraph (1) by not later than 180 days after the

2 enactment of this Act.

Æ
2016-1123.

#### State ex rel. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.

In Mandamus. Sua sponte, an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.06: parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file a brief within 10 days after the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Kent State University shall file, under seal, copies of the unredacted documents at issue in this case at the time of the filing of the evidence.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
# Asian American, Pacific Islander heritage celebrated in May

/ Published May 18, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Each year, during the month of May, we celebrate and honor the contributions that Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders have made and the part they have played in the history of this country.  This year’s theme is “Honoring the Past, Securing the Future!” The theme pays tribute to the Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders and Native Hawaiians who answered the call of selfless service by participating in the defense of our nation.  This year’s theme coincides with the 75th Anniversary of World War II.

Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime’s poster honors First Sergeant Thomas Harimoto from the 442nd Regimental Combat Team. During World War II, the 442nd was composed of Japanese-American citizens or “Nisei.”  During the war, they fought in eight major campaigns throughout Europe. Their motto “Go for Broke!” was not just mere words as these soldiers displayed unmatched courage and resolve during the war. They were one of the most decorated regiments, earning more than 18,000 individual decorations and eight Presidential Unit Citations.  These soldiers fought and served bravely and they knew they were fighting for the future.

We encourage all DLA Land and Maritime associates to celebrate Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month by “honoring the past” of the 442nd Regimental Combat Team’s extraordinary accomplishments.     

For more information on Asian American and Pacific Islander contributions visit https://history.army.mil/html/topics/apam/index.html and https://asianpacificheritage.gov/

Read the Presidential Proclamation here.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1734

MICHAEL D. WILKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JUDGE HENDERSON; WOODROW P. LIPSCOMB, Attorney; WILLIAM SUGG, Judge; CHARLES MCCORMICK,

Judge; JUDICIAL INQUIRY AND REVIEW COMMISSION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-899)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael D. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Anton Joseph Stelly, William

S. Smithers, Jr., THOMPSON, SMITHERS, NEWMAN & WADE, Richmond,

Virginia; Richard Cullen, Gregory E. Lucyk, Claude Alexander Allen,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Lipscomb, Sugg, McCormick, and

Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission. We dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction because the order did not dispose of all the

defendants in the action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ.

P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In re Disqualification of Patton. The City of Cleveland *v.*Coleman.

2017-Ohio-2839.]

(No. 17-AP-008

Decided February 16, 2017.)

O’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} Defendant, Kathy Coleman, has filed an affidavit with the clerk of this court under R.C. 2701.03 and 2701.031 seeking to disqualify Judge Charles L. Patton from presiding over any further proceedings in the above-captioned case.

(¶ 2} Ms. Coleman, however, filed her affidavit on February 15, 2017—only two days before the next scheduled hearing in the case. Under R.C. 2701.03(B), an affidavit of disqualification must be filed “not less than seven calendar days before the day on which the next hearing in the proceeding is scheduled.” This statutory deadline may be set aside “only when compliance with the provision is impossible,” such as when the alleged bias or prejudice occurs fewer than seven days before the hearing date or the case is scheduled or assigned to a judge within seven days of the next hearing. *In re Disqualification of Leskovyansky,*88 Ohio St.3d 1210, 723 N.E.2d 1099 (1999).

{¶ 3} Ms. Coleman avers that she attempted to file her affidavit on February 10—which would have made it timely—but was told by a court employee to send in another affidavit because her initial affidavit “did not say sworn to.”1 She claims that she thereafter filed the present affidavit, which indicates that she swore to the allegations before a notary.

{¶ 4} Ms. Coleman has not established that it was impossible for her to comply with the statutory seven-day filing requirement. Rather, the record indicates that she attempted to file a deficient affidavit on February 10 and therefore *1253submitted a second (and corrected) affidavit on February 15. Ms. Coleman’s failure to initially comply with the requirements of R.C. 2701.03, however, does not excuse her from the statutory deadline. Accordingly, her affidavit of disqualification is dismissed as untimely.

1

. R.C. 2701.03(A) requires that a party seeking to disqualify a judge file an “affidavit” with the clerk of this court. Under Ohio law, an affidavit is a “ ‘written declaration under oath.’ ” *In re Disqualification of Donnelly,*134 Ohio St.3d 1221, 2011-Ohio-7080, 982 N.E.2d 713, ¶ 2, quoting R.C. 2319.02. “A paper purporting to be an affidavit, but not to have been sworn to before an officer, is not an affidavit.” *In re Disqualification of Pokorny,*74 Ohio St.3d 1238, 657 N.E.2d 1345 (1992).
Petition for Exemption

Scott Vigneault Birds Eye View Aerial Video and Photography 166 Gile Road Nottingham, NH 03290

I, Scott Vigneault , hereby submit this petition for exemption under Section 333; FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112

- 95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333. I request this exemption in order to operate my UAV/UAS, DJI Inspire 1 Professional Quadcopter Aircraft, in order to provide services for profit to include aerial photography, aerial cinematography, aerial filming and photography for real estate, construction firms, agricultural modeling, crop monitoring operations, aerial mapping, special events to include b ut not limited to weddings, private or public parties/events, business advertising, promotional events, geological surveying, and environmental studies.

I have completed Drone Dart Training and have attached my certificate of completion. The ability to provide these services to other local businesses and individuals in my community will benefit them by opening up opportunities they otherwise did not have before. Traditional methods of aerial photography/videography are simply not viable options for the ave rage consumer as they are costly and involve greater risks to everyone involved; i.e. the use of larger aircraft carrying humans and flammable fuel. By utilizing the UAV/UAS the same results can be achieved with much safer conditions.

Prior to each fligh t/operation of the UAV/UAS, I will conduct a Pre

- Flight Safety Inspection. All flights will be performed areas cleared for flight using www.skyvector.com to make sure we are in authorized airspace. Flights will not take place over densely populated areas o r private property without the owners permission. The UAV/UAS will only be operated within visual line of sight and will not be flown near airports or above 400 feet. Any and all repairs will be performed only by the manufacturers authorized repair facilities/ providers. The FAA can be confident that operations of this UAV/UAS will achieve at least the equivalent or greater level of safety.

The requests of this petition are similar to those of Brian Punch

, Mr. Jase W. Robak, Mr. Todd Thomas Drone Pics , Brandon Drivon, and Mr. Mike Lloyd Lloyd & Associates, all of whom have received Section 333 exemptions for comparable aircraft for similar operations.

The specific sections of 14 C.F.R from which I am seeking exemption are as follows: 14 C.F.R. Part 21 ; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. 61.101(e)(4), & (5); 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. 61.133 (a); 14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) & (c); 14 C.F.R 91.7(a) 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2); 14C.F.R. 91.109(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.119; 14 C.F.R. 91.121; 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. 91 .203(a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1);14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2};

14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b).

Please find the included User Manual, Quick Start Guide, Safety Guide, and Intelligent Flight Battery Safety Guide.

I truly thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, Scott Vigneault Founder Birds Eye View Aerial Video and Photography
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Euramax International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Scott Vansant,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ R. SCOTT VANSANT                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| R. Scott Vansant                        |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer and Secretary* |   |
| March 31, 2005                     |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           AUG-2-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                FEB-1-1997
<CASH>                                            5048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2261
<ALLOWANCES>                                        29
<INVENTORY>                                       2640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10892
<PP&E>                                            7769
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   15933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5346
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3775
<OTHER-SE>                                        4656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10892
<SALES>                                           7525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7525
<CGS>                                             4200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3532)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3532)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
# Alabama disposal pro honored

/ Published March 17, 2020
Battle Creek, Mich., 
Property Disposal Specialist Chris Pearson is the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services category three Employee of the Quarter for the start of fiscal 2020.

Pearson grew up in Alabama, where he spent his formative years in the town of Pelham. He said that after graduating high school, he majored in marketing at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and graduated in 1989 with a bachelor’s of science in business. After college, he spent nearly two decades in retail store management, before coming to work for DLA Distribution Anniston in 2006 as an inventory technician. A year later, he moved over to DLA Disposition Services, where he remains to this day.

“I oversee scrap operations, the two [commercial venture] contracts and many other duties,” Pearson said. “My years of customer service experience have served me well. I try to go the extra mile to be friendly and help our customers and generators as much as possible and be good stewards of government property and funds.”

Pearson has gone to Kuwait twice for the agency and was a plankowner at the disposition site at Camp Leatherneck in Afghanistan.

“It is such a privilege to work for DLA Disposition Services,” Pearson said. “I have wonderful co-workers, we act as a team. When someone is out, we fill the gap, because the show must go on.”

Pearson’s award nomination cited his efforts during a process change period that “would have put a high temperature alloy metal into a scrap commodity code that would have only paid the government [two] cents per pound, when historically this commodity would bring $4 [plus] per pound. With Chris's keen attention to detail ... Chris kept the government from losing approximately $1 [million] annually. Chris is the ultimate team player who consistently performs assigned duties in a proficient and timely manner.”

“I am very proud to have been nominated and was floored when told I was chosen for first place,” Pearson said, who also tipped his cap to three “wonderful” daughters, two grandchildren, two dogs and a "pretty evil” cat.
M14004 Modeling using Experimental Data Page 1 of 8



### CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVEDM14004 Modeling using Experimental Data Page 2 of 8



### CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVEDM14004 Modeling using Experimental Data Page 3 of 8



### CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVEDM14004 Modeling using Experimental Data Page 4 of 8



### CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVEDM14004 Modeling using Experimental Data Page 5 of 8



### CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVEDM14004 Modeling using Experimental Data Page 6 of 8



### CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVEDM14004 Modeling using Experimental Data Page 7 of 8



### CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVEDM14004 Modeling using Experimental Data Page 8 of 8



### CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
*January 24, 2018*

2018-Ohio-257.]

*14882016-1783.

#### State v. Bates.

Hamilton C.P. No. B1501811. On appellant’s motion for leave to amend brief. Motion granted. Appellant shall file an amended brief within 20 days. Appellee’s brief is due within 20 days of the filing of appellant’s amended brief.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Mylaysia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Mylaysia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov   | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ---
|2019                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 3,698 |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|2020                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0  
|2022                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0  
|2023                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0  
|2024                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |       |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Kentucky Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Kentucky Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1,336  | 1,873  | 2,155  | 2,279  | 2,402  | 2,112  | 1,718 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,492  | 1,730  | 2,105  | 2,573  | 2,162  | 1,945  | 1,744  | 1,816  | 1,777  | 1,615 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,075  | 1,980  | 3,442  | 2,278  | 2,044  | 2,879  | 3,524  | 2,676  | 3,914  | 4,862 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,626  | 5,925  | 6,095  | 6,095  | 4,801  | 6,175  | 5,515  | 5,213  | 5,142  | 4,673 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,376  | 4,522  | 5,131  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024