alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Tyler Y., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 529]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County, (Stewart H. Weinstein, J.), entered on or about February 4, 2016, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the third degree, and placed him on probation for 12 months, unanimously reversed, as an exercise of discretion in the interest of justice, without costs, the delinquency finding and dispositional order vacated, and the matter remanded to Family Court with the direction to order an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal nunc pro tunc to February 4, 2016.

Although we find appellant’s challenges to the sufficiency and weight of the evidence unavailing, we conclude that an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal would have been *442the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection *(see Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947 [1984]), and we exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction accordingly.

Concur— Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
No. 12-7328.

#### Polidore *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|No chart available.                                             
|No chart available.                                             
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Missouri Natural Gas International Receipts (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Cassandro, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 299]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered July 29, 2014, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of scheme to defraud in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of IV3 to 4 years, and restitution in the amount of $5,870,168, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s arguments concerning the jury charge on first-degree grand larceny are moot, since he was acquitted of that charge *(see People v Moore,*35 AD3d 291 [1st Dept 2006], *lv denied*8 NY3d 988 [2007]). Defendant’s assertion that the alleged deficiency in the larceny, charge may have affected the scheme to defraud conviction is unavailing. His arguments concerning the jury charge on scheme to defraud are unpre-served, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the court was not required to give the “moral certainty” charge set forth in Penal Law § 155.05 (2) (d), because scheme to defraud has no such special burden of proof *(see People v Burks,*195 AD2d 1014 [4th Dept 1993], *lv denied*82 NY2d 804 [1993]).

Defendant’s arguments concerning the prosecutor’s cross-examination and summation are unpreserved *(see People v Heide,*84 NY2d 943, 944 [1994]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal *(see People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133 [1st Dept 1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 976 [1998]; *People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114 [1st Dept 1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 884 [1993]). Moreover, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt (see *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

Defendant’s challenges to the court’s restitution order as to five of the victims are also unpreserved (see *People v Horne,*97 NY2d 404, 414 n 3 [2002]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we perceive no basis for reducing the amount of restitution.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Feinman, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
No. 09-10937.

#### Gerald F. Warren, Petitioner v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

562 U.S. 823, 131 S. Ct. 383,

178 L. Ed. 2d 18,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6561.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 25, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 360 Fed. Appx. 136.
# DLA Distribution Tobyhanna, Pennsylvania, employee Justine Gragilla is awarded the DLA Distribution Administrative Support Performance of the Year Award

/ Published Aug. 12, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
For outstanding excellence on a continual basis, Justine Gragilla, secretary , Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Tobyhanna, Pennsylvania, has been awarded the DLA Distribution Administrative Support Performance of the Year Award.

Managing the day to day activities of 178 personnel, including command staff, she maintains a constant level of professionalism, enthusiasm and attention to detail. Gragilla constantly maintained internal schedules and the coordination of activities, including validating all information entered into the employee activity guide and labor entry system.

Gragilla maintained outstanding timekeeping and financial records for 178 employees. She provided support and situational awareness for key events at DDTP including the change of command, Thanksgiving luncheons, distinguished visitors and workshops. She is a role model in customer service, responding to all customer requests whether internal or external with swift and accurate information.

Gragilla’s knowledge within the Wholesale Division has positively influenced DDTP’s reputation with on-base and off-base customers, quickly and efficiently answering difficult questions regarding received material, on-hand balances and shipment tracking information. Additionally, she shifted her functions to perform packing, packaging, preservation and marking at various times including end-of-year closeout.

Gragilla’s actions are a great reflection upon herself and an example of dedication to always placing the warfighter first.
Exhibit 13.2




Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 USC §1350,


as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of TTI Team Telecom International Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tali Cohen-Tueg, certify, pursuant to 18 USC §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: March 24, 2010

/s/ Tali Cohen-TuegTali Cohen-Tueg

Chief Financial Officer
#### Jay H., Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[51 NYS3d 868]

—Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from orders of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered on or about April 7, 2015, and on or about October 14, 2015, and said appeals having been withdrawn before argument by counsel for the respective parties; and upon the stipulation of the parties hereto dated April 13, 2017, it is unanimously ordered that said appeals be and the same are hereby withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid stipulation.

Concur—Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.
#### Com. v. Piccolo

12/01/2015

534 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1123
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
NewSouth  Bancorp,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.  333-49759)  of our report  dated
November  5, 1998 on our  audits of the  consolidated  financial  statements  of
NewSouth  Bancorp,  Inc. as of September 30, 1998 and 1997,  and for each of the
three  years in the period  ended  September  30,  1998,  which  report has been
incorporated by reference in NewSouth Bancorp, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Raleigh, North Carolina
December 23, 1998
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14816]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-164-002]

Wyoming Interstate Company; Notice of Tariff Compliance Filing

May 29, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 26, 1998, Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd. 
(WIC), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, Sub Second Revised Sheet No. 16B, Substitute 
First Revised Sheet No. 17A; and for its Second Revised Volume No. 2 
tariff Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 25, Substitute Second Revised 
Sheet No. 26, Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 39 and Substitute 
First Revised Sheet No. 64G to be effective May 1, 1998.
    WIC states the tariff sheets are filed in compliance with the order 
issued April 30, 1998 in Docket No. RP98-164-000, as well as Section 
154.203 of the Commission's Regulations.
    WIC further states that copies of this compliance filing have been 
served on WIC's jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14816 Filed 6-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### In the Matter of Johnathan Johnson, Petitioner, v Carmen R. Velasquez, Respondent.

[52 NYS3d 909]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, Carmen R. Velasquez, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to determine the petitioner’s motion in an action entitled *Johnson v R & G Gen. Constr. Co.,*pending in that court under Index No. 20061/12, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied as academic and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The instant proceeding has been rendered academic in light of the determination of the subject motion in an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 29, 2016.

Balkin, J.P., Roman, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Price of Portal, ND Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Price of Portal, ND Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | --     | 10.18  | 7.41   | 8.05   | 8.86   | 9.43  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Knows Gun Jr. v. Big Horn County

OP 17-0199

04/25/17

Denied

Original Proceeding Habeas Corpus
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

**Certification of the ChiefFinancial Officer Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jerry Wong, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

June28, 2007
|        | /s/ Jerry Wong          |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Jerry Wong              |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Biomass Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Biomass Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 543    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of D.G., K.G., H.M.G., 

Children

No. 06-15-00025-CV

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 

1 of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

2014-0872-CCL1). Opinion delivered by 

Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and 

Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellants have adequately indicated their inability to pay costs of 

appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 28, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
1491()'I:l"PI



# ---

" 

# -- " 11-,:1. -/0 

## ••..•....••.•.. ~ 

# ,- L 

# - I 

# "l/l.I/~ -........

# ..""';' 

## 7&,-I:I,b 

# - --(:Gr"", J 

### DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Port 39 tJ



# 2-010- ;30D [Docket No. FAA·20u.*,,-u; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM"()69-AD] 

### Federal Aviation Administraqon

R1N ZI2().AA64 

### Airworthiness Dlnctlves; BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Model I 

### BAe 146 Airplanes. and Model Avro 146-RJ Airplanes AGENCY, Federal Aviotion Administration (FAAi. DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

### (NPRM)l SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

### airworth1ess directive (AD) fOT the produc 

# I listed above that would supersede an existing AD.

# liS proposed AD results from mandatory 

### continuing airworthiness 

### information (MeAl) originated by 811 aviation authority of another country to Mentify and correct

# Lunsafe condition 00 an aviation 

### product. The MeAl 

### describes the unsafe condition

# L:

, ' , During the period 

### 2001q002, skin cracking ,was found adjacent to the butt 

### joint forward of frame 1~ •••. The cracks emanated from chemically-etched pockets on the internal sqrface of the skin ..•.•.• [Clracking in multiple adja.cent bays" •.• ~u1d compromise the structural integrity ofthe fuselage 

### in the event that the multiple cracks joined into a single crack. • • • I 

### During 200S. a further report was received at BAE Systems ofa 13.78 inchcrackinan AVROJ46-RJthat~ 514flightcycles (FC) short of the next 4 OOO-FCrepetitive inspection iDterval. 

# .... I· ... The proposed AD would requir

# 1 actions tbat are injnded to address the unsafe conditi described in the MeAl.

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (&-39) 0FflCIAl ALE COPY
#### Tyrone Jones, Respondent, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

[67 NYS3d 200]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered February 17, 2017, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff was injured when he slipped and fell on ice. Defendant submitted evidence, including the testimony of its supervisor of caretakers that the sidewalks abutting its building were free of ice and snow when he arrived at the building on the date of plaintiffs accident.

In opposition, plaintiff raised triable issues of fact as to whether a hazardous icy condition existed and whether defendant had notice of that condition. Plaintiff’s climatological expert opined, after reviewing relevant climatological reports, that snow had ceased falling two days before plaintiff’s accident, but snow and ice would have remained on the ground in untreated areas on the morning of his accident, thus giving defendant sufficient time to discover and remedy the hazardous ice condition *(see Massey v Newburgh W. Realty, Inc.,*84 AD3d 564 [1st Dept 2011]). Plaintiff also testified that before he fell he saw ice covering part of the sidewalk. He described the ice that he saw after his fall as “[b]rownish” and “dirty,” thereby raising issues as to whether the icy condition had been on the sidewalk long enough to clear it before the accident *(see Perez v New York City Hous. Auth.,*114 AD3d 586 [1st Dept 2014]; *Wright v Emigrant Sav. Bank,*112 AD3d 401 [1st Dept 2013]). Furthermore, contrary to defendant’s contentions, plaintiff identified the cause of his fall, since he testified that he saw ice on the ground when he looked sideways, when he fell, face down, onto it *(see Lakins v 171 E. 205th St. Corp.,*118 AD3d *427451 [1st Dept 2014]).

Concur—Richter, J.R, Tom, Kapnick, Kern and Moulton, JJ.
2016-1214.

#### State v. Mundt.

Noble App. No. 13 NO 0406, 2016-Ohio-4802.