alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered July 10, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 00280 - CR MICHAEL BLOOM, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court of Appeals No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MC - R - 0019 - D



### O RDER On July 9, 2014 Michael Bloom filed a “Motion to Stay Mandate and Nullify Void Judgment” in the above cause. The mandate in this cause issued on June 30, 2014. Accordingly, we construe Bloom’s request to stay the manda te as a request to withdraw the mandate. Bloom’s motion is DENIED

. /s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
# Charters reflect partnerships to help supply warfighters

/ Published Oct. 9, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime cemented its partnership with a strategic supplier and renewed the relationship with another in the first week of October. Eaton’s Aerospace Group signed a strategic supplier alliance charter Oct. 3 with the Central Ohio logistics hub at the Defense Supply Center Columbus. The signing marked a transfer in the partnership from Richmond, Virginia-based DLA Aviation to DLA Land and Maritime.

DLA Land and Maritime also renewed its charter with Raytheon Oct. 1, as part of a series of annual renewals with several strategic suppliers over the coming weeks. The charters are designed to foster collaboration in order to provide improved supply chain support to the nation’s warfighters.

“These partnerships are important because they set a firm foundation for continued warfighter support,” said Navy Rear Adm. John Palmer, commander of DLA Land and Maritime.

Building and maintaining strong partnerships is a key focus area of DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell K. Williams’ Industry Engagement Plan.

“Warfighter First is our No. 1 priority and our success in ensuring military service readiness and combatant command lethality would not be possible without strong partnerships with industry,” Williams stated in the program’s release. “This plan focuses on DLA building stronger industry partnerships that are designed to meet long-term objectives and produce the most cost-effective and innovative solutions for our customers.”

For more information about DLA’s Industry Engagement Plan and doing business with DLA, visit https://www.dla.mil/Info/strategicplan/IndustryEngagementPlan/#WorkingWithDLA
Presidential Documents

27661

Federal Register

Vol. 63, No. 96

Tuesday, May 19, 1998

Title 3—

The President

Notice of May 18, 1998

Continuation of Emergency With Respect to Burma

On May 20, 1997, I issued Executive Order 13047, effective at 12:01 a.m.

eastern daylight time on May 21, 1997, certifying to the Congress under

section 570(b) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related

Programs Appropriations Act, 1997 (Public Law 104–208), that the Government of Burma has committed large-scale repression of the democratic opposition in Burma after September 30, 1996, thereby invoking the prohibition

on new investment in Burma by United States persons, contained in that

section. I also declared a national emergency to deal with the threat posed

to the national security and foreign policy of the United States by the

actions and policies of the Government of Burma, invoking the authority,

inter alia, of the International emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C.

1701-1706).

The national emergency declared on May 20, 1997, must continue beyond

May 20, 1998, as long as the Government of Burma continues its policies

of committing large-scale repression of the democratic opposition in Burma.

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies

Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect

to Burma. This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmit-

[FR Doc. 98–13590

ted to the Congress.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

May 18, 1998.

œ–

Filed 5–18–98; 12:05 pm]

Billing code 3195–01–P
#### In the Matter of Roberto O., an Infant. Lakeysha H., Appellant; Children’s Aid Society, Respondent.

[53 NYS3d 831]

Appeal from order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper), Family Court, Bronx County (Sarah R Cooper, J.), entered on or about July 22, 2016, which, upon respondent mother’s failure to appear, found, among other things, that she had permanently neglected the subject child, terminated her parental rights, and freed the child for adoption, unanimously dismissed, without costs, and assigned counsel’s motion to withdraw granted.

Assigned counsel has advised this Court that after examination of the record, he has determined that respondent’s case presents no viable issues, as no appeal lies from an order entered on default *(see Matter of Lukes Jacob R. [Cynthia R.],*148 AD3d 420, 421 [1st Dept 2017]). Counsel seeks an order allowing him to withdraw. The brief accompanying the motion recites the underlying facts and highlights pertinent portions of the record. Counsel has provided respondent with a copy of the brief and informed her of her right to raise points in a pro se supplemental brief, which she failed to submit. We have reviewed the record and agree with assigned counsel that there are no viable arguments to be raised on appeal *(see Matter of Weems v Administration for Children’s Servs.,*73 AD3d 617 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Richter, Feinman and Webber, JJ.
•C—’_____MARYLANDDEPARTMENTOFTHEENVIRONMENTDE1800WashingtonBoulevard•BaltimoreMD21230lvi410-537-3000•1-800-633-6101MartinO’MalleyShariT.WilsonGovernorSecretaryRECEIVEDAnthonyG.BrownRobertM.Summers,Ph.D.LieutenantGovernorJUL262010DeputySecretaryEPA.REGIONIllOPFICEOFREGIONALADMINISTRATORJuly21,2010Mr.ShawnM.GarvinUSEPAREGION31650ArchStreetMailCode:3RAOOPhiladelphia,PA19103-2029DearMr.Garvin,TheMarylandDepartmentoftheEnvironment(MDE)isformallysubmittingtheattachedletterthataddressestheCleanAirActSection110(a)(2)elementsforthe2006revisionstothePM2.5NAAQS.TheMDEisalsoprovidingdocumentationshowingthatathirtydaycommentperiodwasofferedontheCAA110(a)(2)letterandnocommentswerereceived.IfImaybeoffurtherassistance,pleasecontactmeorMrs.DianeFranks,ProgramManager,AirQualityPlanningProgramat410-537-3250orbyemailatdfranks@mde.state.md.us.Sincerely,RECEIVEDJUL272010George(Tad)AburnDivisionDirector(3APOO)DirectorAirandRadiationManagementAdministrationCC:DianeFranks,ProgramManager,AirQualityPlanningProgramBrianHug,DeputyProgramManager,AirQualityPlanningProgramRecycledPaperwww.mde.state.md.usTTYUsers1-800-735-2258ViaMarylandRelayService
#### Towe Farms v. Corbett

DA 16-0601

05/30/17

2017 MT 131N

Affirmed

Dist. 16 (Custer)
2016-1639.

#### State v. Goins.

Cuyahoga App. No. 103874, 2016-Ohio-5930.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-1587SD

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of South Dakota.

*

Eugene P. Kent, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: October 20, 1997 

Filed: October 30, 1997

_____________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Eugene P. Kent appeals his conviction for mail fraud and the sentence imposed

by the district court. Kent raises several contentions related to the sufficiency of the

evidence to support the jury's verdict, the district court's denial of Kent's motion for

new trial, and the district court's loss calculations and refusal to depart downward under

the sentencing guidelines. Because the appeal involves a straightforward application

of settled principles of law, a discussion of the issues will serve no useful purpose. We

thus affirm Kent's conviction and sentence without an extended opinion. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
2017-0198.

#### State v. Murphy.

Cuyahoga App. No. 102284. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief financial officer of
Microvision, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)     the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:August 4, 2006 | By: /s/ Jeff T. Wilson   Jeff T. Wilson
 Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------

---
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 20-F/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 o
    
    REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 OR
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from          to
 OR
 o
    
    SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR SECTION 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Commission file number 1-14542
 ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE
CORPORATION LIMITED
  Bermuda   7/Fl. B, No. 132, Sec. 3
Min-Sheng East Road
Taipei, 105, Taiwan
Republic of China
  13,830,769 Common Shares
 o þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o o
  Large accelerated filer o
    
    Accelerated filer o
    
    Non-accelerated filer þ
    
    Smaller reporting company o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 þ o o
 o o
 o þ




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE
CORPORATION LIMITEDDate: June 15, 2010
    /s/ Yuan Chun TangYuan Chun TangChief Executive Officer
#### Mumma, In re Estate of

08/18/2016

823, 981, 982 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 1205
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSOF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I, Tom W. Olofson, ChiefExecutive Officer of EPIQ Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifypursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code,and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge, (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of theCompany to which this Exhibit is attached (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| /s/ TOM  W. OLOFSON      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Tom W. Olofson           |
| Dated:March 8, 2006 |

 

I, Elizabeth M. Braham, Chief Financial Officer ofEPIQ Systems, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350,of chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code, and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, (1) theannual report on Form 10-K of the Company to which this Exhibit isattached (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ ELIZABETH  M. BRAHAM |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Elizabeth M. Braham      |
| Dated:March 8, 2006 |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1929 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1929

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
   coastwise trade for each of the vessels SHAMROCK V and ENDEAVOUR.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 15 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
   coastwise trade for each of the vessels SHAMROCK V and ENDEAVOUR.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 U.S.C. App. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for each of--
            (1) the vessel SHAMROCK V (United States official number 
        900936); and
            (2) the vessel ENDEAVOUR (United States official number 
        947869).

                                 <all>
```
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________
NO

. 09

- 1 6

- 00 136

- C V



### ____________________

RICHARD F. BUNCH III AND MICHELLE BUNCH , ET AL, Appellant s

V.

THE WOODLANDS LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LP, ET AL , Appellee s

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No

. 12

- 02

- 01950

- CV

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellant s , Richard F. Bunch III and Michelle Bunch , filed a motion to

sever that portion of the trial court’s judgment in favor of HVJ Associates, Inc., set

aside the severed portion, and remand the severed portion of the case to the trial

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. No ne of

th e part ies filed an objection to the appellants’ motion to sever, set aside, and2 remand. A severable portion of the appeal may be disposed of by agreement of the

parties if it will not prejudice the remaining parties. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(b ).

We grant the motion, sever the Bunches’ appeal of the trial court’s summary

judgment dismissing with prejudice the Bunches’ claims against HVJ Associates,

Inc., vacate without regard to the merits the trial court’s judgment dismissing the

Bunches’ claims a gainst HVJ Associates, Inc., and remand that part of the case to

the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(d).

We direct the Clerk of the Court to change the style of the appeal to Richa rd

F. Bunch III and Michelle Bunch , et al. v. The Woodlands Land Development

Company, LP

.

APPEAL SEVERED; VACATED AND REMA N DED

.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on September 28, 2016 Opinion Delivered September 29, 2016

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
164 A.3d 390

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. O.C.Q., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 16, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
#### Com. v. Hicks16

04/13/2016

10 EAL (2016)

16

. Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 654
#### DeCelles v. Kirkegard

OP 17-0210

04/18/17

Denied

Original Proceeding Habeas Corpus
**Exhibit 21.1**

**EPIQ SYSTEMS, INC.**

**Listof Subsidiaries**
| **Subsidiary**                         | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | ** **                                 | **State of Organization** | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Doing Business As** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------|------------|------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------|------------|------------|------------|-----------------------|------------|
| EPIQ Systems Acquisition, Inc.(1) |       | New York   |       |                                       |
| Bankruptcy  Services LLC(2)            |       | New  York  |       | Bankruptcy  Services                       |
| P-D Holding  Corp.(1)                  |       | Oregon     |       |                                       |
| Poorman-Douglas Company(3)             |       | Oregon     |       | Poorman Douglas  Huntington Legal Services |

----

(1)          100% owned by EPIQSystems, Inc.

(2)          100% owned by EPIQSystems Acquisition, Inc.

(3)          100% owned by P-D HoldingCorp.

----
P.1 

OAR Box 1875 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

5) ll-E-23 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/1/2008 11:12:44 AM Sheet 5 of 86 
P.2 

.. —— 7T"£ ;> V'"1 i ; in'1 

JACA Corp. 

oed« 

» f -

A-90-19 

ll-E-23 

550 Pinetown Rd. 

-";•'-" • • Ft. Washington, PA 19034 

—- " 215/643-5466 Fax: 215/643-2772 

Telephone Log 

Date: March 15. 1991 

Time: 

Project No.: 007219 

Project Name: HON 

Person Contacted/Title: nnng iimipy, Rpprp^pntativp 

Phone Number: (201) 776-7888 Fax: 

Company 

Representing: Mannsville Chemical Products Corporation 

JACA Representative: Andre K. Jenkins 

Discussion: I wanted to obtain average realized price information for polvcarbonate-qrade Bisphenol-A. I was told by Mr. Lumley that most polycarbonate-grade BPA 

is consumed captively. Thus, i t is difficul t to determine an average realized price.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 84619 IN THE MAITER OF THE RESIGNATION OF PETER J. SMITH, BAR NO. 820. 

# FILE

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR RESIGNATION This is a joint petition by the State Bar of Nevada and attorney Peter J. Smith for his resignation from the Nevada bar.

SCR 98(5) provides that Nevada attorneys who are not actively practicing law in this state may resign from the state bar if certain conditions are met. The petition includes statements from state bar staff confirming that no disciplinary, fee dispute arbitration, or client security fund matters are pending against Smith; and that he is current on all membership fee payments and other financial commitments relating to his practice of law in this state. See SCR 98(5)(a)(1)-(2).

Bar counsel has recommended that the resignation be approved, and the Board of Governors has approved the application for resignation. See SCR 98(5)(a)(2). Smith acknowledges that his resignation is irrevocable and that the state bar retains continuing jurisdiction with respect to matters involving a past member's conduct prior to resignation.
See SCR 98(5)(c)-(d). Finally, Smith has submitted an affidavit of compliance with SCR 115. SeeSCR 98(5)(e).



## rx. iSoirThe petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5).

Accordingly, we approve attorney Peter J. Smith's resignation. SCR 98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted.

It is so ORDERED.

cc: Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Peter J. Smith Executive Director Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court

2
Exhibit 32.01

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Macrovision Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Alfred J. Amoroso certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), that to the best of his knowledge:

(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and

(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as of February 28, 2008.



/s/    ALFRED J.
AMOROSOAlfred J. Amoroso Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14893]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
* * * * *
FEDERAL REGISTER NUMBER: 98-14223.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATE & TIME: Thursday, June 4, 1998, 10 a.m., 
meeting open to the public.
    THIS MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELLED.
* * * * *
DATE & TIME: Tuesday, June 9, 1998 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and 
Title 26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.
* * * * *
DATE & TIME: Thursday, June 11, 1998 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW, Washington, DC (ninth floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Electronic Filing for Presidential 
Committees.
    Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
Marjorie W. Emmons,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-14893 Filed 6-1-98; 3:04 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
160 A.3d 1281

#### IN THE MATTER OF PETER A. ALLEGRA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 000051980)

June 2, 2017

ORDER

This matter have been duly presented pursuant to *Rule*1:20— 10(b), following a granting of a motion for discipline by consent in DRB 17-053 of PETER A. ALLEGRA of HAZLET, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated *RPC*1.7(a)(2)(engaging in a conflict of interest) and *RPC*1.8(a)(entering into a prohibited business transaction with a client);

And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct violated *RPC*1.7(a)(2) and *RPC*1.8(a), and that said conduct warrants a reprimand or lesser discipline;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct and having granted the motion for discipline by consent in District Docket No. XIV-2014-0097E;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with *Rule*1:20—16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PETER A. ALLEGRA of HAZLET is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*228ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in *Rule*1:20-17.