alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Annual Report of Macrovision
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 20043 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), William A. Krepick certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), that to the best of his knowledge:




(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and




(b) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto
signed this Certification as of March 31, 2005.




/s/ WILLIAM A.
KREPICKWilliam A. KrepickChief Executive Officer


---
# Bidetti awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal

/ Published June 18, 2019
CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas, 
Army Lt. Col. Daniel J. Bidetti, was awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal June 18. Bidetti commanded Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas, from June 2017 through June 2019.

“As commander of DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Dan led a remarkable effort to improve our performance in support of our customers and DLA Distribution expectations,” said Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones, commander, DLA Distribution. “His team conducted routine self-analysis and shared knowledge across the workforce establishing well defined goals as we tracked our progress.”

According to his award citation, his emphasis on workforce development greatly enabled professional and organizational growth, creating a pathway to future success. Having received top tier climate survey results, he displayed excellence in every endeavor. 

Bidetti’s next assignment will take him to Fort Hood, Texas, where he will serve with the 1st Armored Division.

Bidetti was born in Bronxville, New York, and graduated from Norwich University with a Bachelor of Arts in mechanical engineering. Some of his previous assignments took him to the 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood; the 173rd Airborne Brigade, Vicenza, Italy; the Joint Readiness Training Center, Fort Polk, Louisiana; the 4th Infantry Division at Fort Carson, Colorado. He also served in Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq three times.

“I am honored by this award and more importantly by my time in command here at Corpus Christi,” said Bidetti. “My family and I look forward to our next assignment back with the 1st Cavalry Division but we will truly miss the people in this organization and those in the community here.”
Exhibit
4.2


 


Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors


True
Energy Inc.


We consent to the use of our audit report dated March 17, 2006 on the on
the consolidated balance sheets of True Energy Trust as at December 31, 2005
and 2004 and the consolidated statements of earnings and deficit and cash flows
for the years then ended incorporated by reference herein.


We consent to the use of our audit report dated May 24, 2006 on the on
the balance sheet of True Oil & Gas Ltd. as at May 23, 2006 ended included
herein.


We consent to the use of our audit report dated March 22, 2005 on the on
the consolidated balance sheets of TKE Energy Trust as at December 31,
2004 and 2003 and the consolidated statements of earnings and accumulated
earnings and cash flows for the years then ended incorporated by reference
herein.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Calgary, Canada


May
24, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Muriel F. Siebert, in
my capacity as Chairwoman and President of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.          the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the
Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by
the Report.

| |                                                          |  |                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
| | /s/ Muriel F. Siebert                                    |  | Dated: May 15, 2006
| |                                                          |  |                    
| | Muriel F. Siebert                                        |  |                    
| | Chairwoman and President
  (principal executive officer) |  |                    

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Siebert
Financial Corp. and will be retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

17

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Tom W. Olofson, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Epiq Systems, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 1, 2010

/s/ TOM
W. OLOFSON
Tom W. Olofson Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
#### Sarah Perris, Appellant, v Malachy J. Maguire, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[49 NYS3d 688]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered November 4, 2015, dismissing the complaint against defendant, pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered October 8, 2015, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the complaint reinstated. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered October 6, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the branch of plaintiff’s motion that sought renewal of defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been denied, due to conflicting accounts of the accident presented in his own moving papers. Defendant’s deposition testimony about the damage to his vehicle supported a reasonable inference of a side impact to his vehicle, instead of a rear-end collision caused by a motorcycle on which plaintiff was a passenger. Because defendant relied upon the presumption of negligence in a rear-end collision, and because issues of fact exist as to whether a rear-end collision had occurred, he failed to meet his prima facie burden of establishing his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]).

Given the foregoing determination, we need not consider the parties’ remaining arguments.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.
<PAGE>

                  GENWORTH LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
                    WAIVER OF SURRENDER CHARGE ENDORSEMENT

This endorsement is effective on the Contract Date. It amends the Contract
Value Benefits section by adding the following:

Waiver of Surrender Charge in the Event of Terminal Illness

We will waive the surrender charge for surrender of one or more withdrawals if:

      .   any Annuitant has been diagnosed with a terminal illness by a
          licensed physician; and

      .   which a licensed physician certifies is expected to result in death
          within 12 months of the certification; and

      .   the diagnosis was made at least one year after the Contract Date; and

      .   the surrender or withdrawal occurs after diagnosis; and

      .   we receive satisfactory proof that the Annuitant has a terminal
          illness.

Satisfactory proof will include a properly completed claim form and a written
statement from a licensed physician. The licensed physician must be someone
other than you, the Annuitant, or an Annuitant(s)'s relative. We reserve the
right to obtain a second medical opinion at our expense.

For Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company,

                             /s/ Pamela S. Schutz
                           -------------------------
                                   President

                                      1
No. 12-8742.

#### Jones *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# Air Force, DLA strengthen collaborative efforts

/ Published Nov. 7, 2019
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency and Air Force leaders discussed readiness and synchronization during the annual Air Force/DLA Day at the McNamara Headquarters Complex Nov. 6.

DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams said DLA can’t support the military services without regular collaboration. Service days are designed to address tough issues that DLA can help customers resolve and shouldn’t be looked at as just mutual admiration sessions, he added.

The event began with a tour of DLA’s new Agency Synchronization Operations Center, which Air Force Lt. Gen. Warren Berry, deputy chief of staff for logistics, engineering and force protection, called educational.

The first briefing focused on a review of the ASOC’s mission and capabilities and how the DLA Readiness Dashboard will continue capturing Air Force readiness rates.

Berry said he values the relationship his service has with DLA and having a forum to address vital issues such as demand planning, funding issues and product support for the F-35 joint strike fighter increases the value of that partnership.

The event closed with a review of takeaways and outstanding tasks.

Berry reiterated that the annual service days are only as valuable as the attendees make them, and the event allowed DLA and the Air Force a chance to inform, educate and collaborate as an enterprise.
exv4w1



 









	

VOL

CUSIP 928645 10 0
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF     VOLCANO CORPORATION
THE STATE OF DELAWARE     SEE REVERSE FOR
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

THIS CERTIFIES THAT

BY     COUNTERSIGNED
is the owner of     AMERICAN
AND
STOCK
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF THE PAR VALUE OF $0.001 PER SHARE OF
VOLCANO CORPORATION     (NEW transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.     REGISTERED: This Certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.     YORK, WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.     TRANSFER
N.Y.)
Dated:     o
C (r)     TRUST
n (o)     (p)(o)
a R(P)(O)(R)(A)(r)
c C (O)(T)E (a)
l SEAL (t)
o     (i)o     AND V JAN. 12, n     AUTHORIZED     TRANSFER COMPANY
2000
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND SECRETARY     (D)EL AWA(R)(E)     PRESIDENT AND CEO     OFFICER     REGISTRAR AGENT










 








	
The Corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests a statement of the designations, powers, preferences and relative participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof of the Corporation and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such request may be made to the Corporation or the Transfer Agent.

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM  as tenants in common     UNIF GIFT MIN ACT
Custodian
TEN ENT  as tenants by the entireties     (Cust)                                      (Minor)
JT TEN  as joint tenants with right of     under Uniform Gifts to Minors survivorship and not as tenants Act                 in common     (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)

shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE
CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

Signature(s) Guaranteed:

THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Caccavale, Appellant.

[58 NYS3d 135]—

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Minihan, J.), rendered January 11, 2016, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was charged with, inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees after the police discovered a gun and bullets stored in a blue bag above the kitchen cabinets in his residence, pursuant to a search warrant. During the plea proceeding, the defendant freely admitted his guilt. Thereafter, while the defendant and his brother were in jail, his brother allegedly claimed that the gun was his and the defendant did not know that the brother had stored the gun in the defendant’s apartment. The brother claimed that he had purchased the gun from an individual who had stolen it from somebody in Poughkeepsie.

The defendant moved for leave to withdraw his plea of guilty, claiming actual innocence. In support, he submitted his brother’s handwritten statement about the brother’s alleged actions. The County Court denied the defendant’s motion, and the defendant appeals.

The defendant’s contentions concerning the voluntariness of his plea of guilty survive the waiver of his right to appeal *(see People v May,*138 AD3d 1146 [2016]).

A claim of actual innocence, made after a plea of guilty, warrants a hearing if there is a sufficient showing of possible merit to warrant a fuller exploration by the court *(see People v Tiger,*149 AD3d 86, 110 [2017]). Here, the brother’s conclusory assertions that the gun was his and that he had hidden it in the defendant’s apartment without the defendant’s knowledge — made *538after the defendant freely admitted his guilt — were insufficient to warrant a hearing with respect to the defendant’s claim of actual innocence. It appears that the defendant only asserted a denial of his guilt after it was apparent that his brother was willing to take responsibility for him. Accordingly, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea of guilty *(see People v Smith,*148 AD3d 939 [2017]; *People v Rodriguez,*142 AD3d 1189 [2016]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Leventhal, J.P., Hall, Hinds-Radix and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

FRANK ZAMPOGNA, Respondent

v.

LAW ENFORCEMENT HEALTH BENEFITS, INC., Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 17 EAL 2014
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 9th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED on the following issues as stated by Petitioner: a. Whether Courts may disregard the vital function of co rporate self-governance by second-guessing the decisions of corporate directors and failing to provide the required deferen ce to their decision simply because the court may not agree with the decision? b. Whether a court may simply usurp the role of corporat e directors by negating the presumption of good-faith to the decision s of directors required by law by simply asserting, without requiring any proof thereof, a conflict of interest by the directors? c. Whether funds, whose original source was a public enti ty, retain

their public character once the public entity distribute s those funds to a private corporation in satisfaction of an obligati on, and after the private corporation had retained those funds as corporat e assets, and after that corporation utilized the corporate assets for a corporate purpose?
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Sunshine Act Meeting

Board Voting Conference
TIME & DATE: 1:00 p.m., Monday, June 8, 1998.

PLACE: Hearing Room, Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. 20423.

STATUS: The Board will meet to discuss among themselves the agenda item 
listed below. Although the conference is open for public observation, 
no public participation is permitted.

MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED: Finance Docket No. 33388, CSX Corporation And 
CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Corporation And Norfolk 
Southern Railway Company--Control And Operating Leases/Agreements--
Conrail Inc. And Consolidated Rail Corporation.

CONTACT PERSONS FOR MORE INFORMATION: Dennis Watson, Office of 
Congressional and Public Services, Telephone: (202) 565-1594, TDD: 
(202) 565-1695.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14469 Filed 5-27-98; 3:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3356-3357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,328; TA-W-33,328A; TA-W-33,328B]


Stride Rite Corporation, Hamilton, Missouri, Tipton, Missouri, 
and Lexington, Massachusetts; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 27, 1997, applicable to 
all workers of Stride Rite Corporation located in Hamilton and Tipton, 
Missouri. The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 2, 
1997 (62 FR 24135).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of children's shoes. New information received by the 
company shows that

[[Page 3357]]

worker separations have occurred at the Lexington, Massachusetts 
location of Stride Rite Corporation. The Lexington, Massachusetts 
facility is the corporate headquarters office and provides production 
planning services for children's shoes at Stride Rite Corporation.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Stride Rite Corporation who were adversely affected by 
increased imports of children's shoes. Accordingly, the Department is 
amending the certification to cover the workers of Stride Rite 
Corporation, Lexington, Massachusetts.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33,328 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Stride Rite Corporation, Hamilton, Missouri (TA-
W-33,328), Tipton, Missouri (TA-W-33,328A) and Lexington, 
Massachusetts (TA-W-33,328B) engaged in the production of children's 
shoes who became totally or partially separated from employment on 
or after February 24, 1996 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington D.C. this 14th day of January, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-1469 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M