alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Max Phillips joins the PaCE program

/ Published Dec. 4, 2019
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
                Max Phillips                            . Max Phillips is assigned to the DLA Pathways to Career Excellence Program as a Property Disposal Specialist with Environmental duties and will be assigned to our Field Site at Eglin AFB following his completion of Phase One.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Jace ArmstrongVIRIN: 191203-D-OS362-006Max Phillips is assigned to the DLA Pathways to Career Excellence Program as a Property Disposal Specialist with Environmental duties and will be assigned to our Field Site at Eglin AFB following his completion of Phase One.

Max originally hails from the state of Texas but found his way north by attending Michigan State University where he acquired two Bachelor of Art Degrees in Political Science/Constitutional Law and the other in Supply Chain Management/Logistics. 

Max brings a wealth of knowledge and experience in retail management and customer service.

In his free time, he generally enjoys being outside doing anything from rock climbing to watersports.
Order entered September 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00643-CV

DENISE EDWARDS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF G.E., MINOR,

Appellant

V.

PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 86th District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 90628.86

ORDER

Because appellant’s brief was filed August 28, 2014, we DENY as moot her motion to 

extend the deadline to December 1, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
# Leadership forum engages, inspires GS-14-level leaders

/ Published May 16, 2019
FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA,
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-174-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

January 14, 1998.
    Take notice that on January 8, 1998, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(Williams), P.O. Box 3288, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101, filed in Docket No. 
CP98-174-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 
157.212) for approval to replace the Kansas Gas & Electric Brock meter 
setting and to reinstall the existing Brock meter setting at the Catt 
regulator site, both in Bourbon County, Kansas, under Williams' blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-479-000, pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth in the request 
which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Williams states that the volumes of natural gas at the Catt site 
are currently measured by KG&E and that the installation of the Brock 
meter setting will eliminate Williams' dependence on KG&E for 
measurement at the site. Williams asserts that the projected volume of 
natural gas delivery at the new Brock setting is expected to increase 
over the next few years, but the delivery volumes at the Catt site will 
remain unchanged. Williams further asserts that this change is not 
prohibited by an existing tariff and that Williams has sufficient 
capacity to accomplish the deliveries specified without detriment or 
disadvantage to Williams' other customers. Williams indicates that the 
total project cost is estimated to be $124,125, which will be paid from 
available funds.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1305 Filed 1-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### In the Matter of Persaius A.-K., Appellant. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Yasin A.-K. et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Taymius A.-K., Appellant. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Yasin A.-K. et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[52 NYS3d 903]

Appeal by the children from an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Kings County (Ann E. O’Shea, J.), dated February 9, 2016. The order of fact-finding, insofar as appealed from, after a fact-finding hearing, found that the father did not abuse or severely abuse the child Persaius and did not derivatively abuse or derivatively severely abuse the child Taymius.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding is modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting the provisions thereof finding that the father did not abuse the child Persaius and did not derivatively abuse the child Taymius, and substituting therefor a provision finding that the father abused the child Persaius and derivatively abused the child Taymius; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner made a prima facie showing that the father abused the child Persaius *(see*Family Ct Act §§ 1012 [e] [i]; 1046 [a] [ii]; *Matter of Philip M.,*82 NY2d 238, 243-244 [1993]). The father, who testified on his own behalf at the fact-finding hearing and blamed his girlfriend for Persaius’s injuries, failed to rebut the inference that he was also responsible for the abuse, in that he failed to protect Persaius from physical danger *(see Matter of Nabel C. [Amanda R.],*134 AD3d 504, 505 [2015]; *Matter of Infinite G.,*11 AD3d 688, 689 [2004]; *Matter of Brandon C.,*247 AD2d 380, 381 [1998]; *Matter of Antoine J.,*185 AD2d 925 [1992]). Moreover, the evidence demonstrated that the father’s judgment and understanding of his parental duties were so defective as to create a substantial risk of harm to the child Taymius *(see*Family Ct Act §§ 1012 [e] [i]; 1046 [a] [ii]; *Matter of Amirah L. [Candice J.],*118 AD3d 795, 796 [2014]). Accordingly, we find that Persaius was abused by the father, and that Taymius was derivatively abused by the father.

*1226However, the Family Court properly found that there was not sufficient evidence to clearly and convincingly establish that the father acted under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life so as to support a finding that he severely abused Persaius and derivatively severely abused Taymius (see Social Services Law § 384-b [8] [a] [i]; Family Ct Act § 1051 [e]; *Matter of Jezekiah R.-A. [Edwin R.-E.],*78 AD3d 1550, 1550-1551 [2010]).

Mastro, J.P., Hall, Austin and Barros, JJ., concur.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 24, 2013

NO. 03

- 11

- 00335

- CV

John H. Thomas, M.D., Appellant

v.

Graham Mortgage Corporation and Chris Norris, Substitute Trustee, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 33RD DISTRICT COURT O F BURNET COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

— OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered,

b ecause it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment EXCEPT for

the portions of the trial court’s judgment with respect to the Bank’s claims for a deficiency judgment

and for attorney’s fees : I T IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the opinion and

judgment dated April 4, 2013 , are withdrawn, and this opinion and judgment are substituted in their

places; and that the portions of the trial court’s judgment with respect to the Bank’s claims for a

deficiency judgment and for attorney’s fees are reversed, and th at those portions of the cause are

remanded for further proceedings. However, we affirm the remainder of the trial court’s summary

judgment. It is FURTHER ordered that each part y shall pay the costs of the appeal incurred by that

party, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified below for observance.2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1906 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1906

   To provide that service connection for disabilities arising from 
 exposure to ionizing radiation or dioxin may be established by direct 
                               evidence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              March 8 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

  Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mr. DeConcini, Mr. Graham, Mr. Akaka, 
 and Mr. Daschle) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
           and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that service connection for disabilities arising from 
 exposure to ionizing radiation or dioxin may be established by direct 
                               evidence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERVICE CONNECTION FOR CERTAIN DISABILITIES RELATING TO 
              EXPOSURE TO IONIZING RADIATION OR DIOXIN.

    Section 5 of the Veterans' Dioxin and Radiation Exposure 
Compensation Standards Act (Public Law 98-542; 98 Stat. 2725; 38 U.S.C. 
1154 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(d) The regulations prescribed under this section may not 
prohibit, or be construed to prohibit, a veteran from establishing 
pursuant to section 1110 of title 38, United States Code, service 
connection for a disease or disability that the veteran claims to be 
the result of the veteran's exposure to ionizing radiation or dioxin 
during a period of service referred to in subsection (a)(1), 
notwithstanding that such regulations do not specify that the disease 
or disability is a radiogenic disease or a disease or disability 
associated with dioxin.''.

                                 <all>
```
No. 12-8136.

#### Jiggetts *v.*New York City Human Resources Administration et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Hockett v City of Ithaca

3d Dept: 149 AD3d 1378

denied
#### In the Matter of Danny Rossi, Appellant, v New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, Respondent. In the Matter of Barbara Morris, Appellant, v New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Respondent.

[49 NYS3d 891]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis), entered May 2, 2016, denying petitioner Morris’s petition to compel respondent New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) to issue Morris a restricted area mobile food cart permit, and granting DOHMH’s cross motion to dismiss the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered May 13, 2016, which denied petitioner Rossi’s petition to compel respondent New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) to provide Rossi written authorization to operate a mobile food vending cart on land under its jurisdiction, and granted DPR’s cross motion to dismiss the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*482Contrary to petitioners’ contentions, requiring them to obtain special vending licenses pursuant to General Business Law § 35-a to vend on property under DPR’s jurisdiction does not divest DOHMH of its powers to regulate mobile food vendors. DOHMH licenses mobile food vendors and food vending carts in New York City. Vendors, including food vendors, seeking to avail themselves of the vending terms available to disabled veterans must comply with the additional licensing requirements applicable to disabled veterans, which in New York City are set forth in General Business Law § 35-a *(see Matter of Rossi v New York City Dept. of Parks & Recreation,*127 AD3d 463 [1st Dept 2015]).

We have considered petitioners’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Andrias, Moskow-itz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
# New fueling system provides improved aircraft re-fueling capabilities to Kunsan's 35th Fighter Squadron

/ Published Oct. 22, 2019

The Far East District Kunsan resident office recently completed a project to construct ten hardened aircraft flow-thru shelters for aircraft refueling and a new JP-8 hydrant fueling system. The system is comprised of two 1.6 million liter fuel tanks, two new pump houses, and a 250 millimeter underground hydrant loop routing the fueling systems to each of the individual aircraft refueling shelters. This $39 million project was completed and accepted by the 8th civil engineer squadron on Aug. 1.While the technical requirements of such a project are quite complex, the concept of the “hot pit” refueling system is simple. It provides aircrafts “quick turn” capability to concurrently load munitions and refuel aircrafts while parked in aircraft shelters. It allows aircrafts to meet the minimum times required to support various air operations throughout the Pacific theater. Kunsan is home to two F-16 squadrons: the 35th Fighter Squadron and the 80th Fighter Squadron. These facilities will be exclusively used by the 35th Fighter Squadron.A project of this size naturally presents a host of challenges to the project delivery team in the field, with all of its main and supporting facilities intricately connected by a series of piping systems, not to mention stringent standards that must be met by facilities that receive and transfer fuel of any kind. The most substantial project milestone, by far, is the commissioning and acceptance testing of the aircraft fueling system, which took place over an approximately five week span, culminating in government witness by the Defense Logistics Agency (project owner). Key to the successful completion is close coordination with the contractor, Defense Logistics Agency, title II service contractor, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mandatory Center of Expertise (MCX), and the Air Force IMSC (installation’s technical representative). Like most projects, a little teamwork goes a long way, but that is especially true on fueling system projects, which tend to require a high degree of inter-agency interaction.The successful completion of this project reflects highly on the close teamwork the Kunsan Resident Office has with the 8th Fighter Wing, known as the Wolf Pack and the fighter squadrons that form the backbone of their operations at Kunsan Air Base. This project will continue to support the Wolf Pack’s mission for many years to come.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the US Army Corps of Engineers Far East District website.*
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**QUAD M SOLUTIONS, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quad M Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |    |                                                                                                                                                |
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |

  

 

| Date: May 20, 2020 | By:    | */s/ Pasquale Dileo*                                                   |   |
|--------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|               | Name:  | Pasquale Dileo                                                         |   |
|               | Title: | Interim Chief Financial Officer                                        |        |
|               |   | (Interim Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |        |
# The Right Talent, Right Now; DLA Land and Maritime hosts National Disability Employment Awareness Month program

/ Published Oct. 31, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Associates at Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime attended the 2019 National Disability Employment Awareness Month program on Oct. 23 in the Operations Center’s Conference Room to gain insight into the world of their coworkers who have disabilities.

The program was hosted by the Defense Federal Community Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity. Associates were invited to take part in a panel discussion comprised of three Land and Maritime associates who shared associates their experiences, their disabilities, and the effects on their lives and careers. The panelists were Hugh Swanson, purchasing agent, Alice Ferguson, purchasing agent, and Paul Allen Gambrell, chief of Disability, Diversity, and Affirmative Employment Division, Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity.

The U.S. Department of Labor announced "The Right Talent, Right Now" as the theme for the 2019 National Disability Employment Awareness Month.

The 2019 theme emphasizes the essential role that people with disabilities play in America's economic success, especially in an era when historically low unemployment and global competition are creating a high demand for skilled talent. The Department's Office of Disability Employment Policy administers NDEAM.

During his introductory remarks, DLA Land and Maritime Acquisition Executive Mark Brown spoke of the meaning of this year’s theme and the importance of ensuring opportunities to employment, education and equal access for all people, regardless of physical abilities. 

“I believe it reflects Land and Maritime’s dedication to creating workforce diversity through our commitment to promote increased employment opportunities for people with disabilities,” Brown said. “In fact, historically Land and Maritime has regularly exceeded national disability hiring benchmarks, achieving 15% during Fiscal Year 2018. And our strategy is to energize our hiring momentum to create even more opportunities.”

Observed annually in October, NDEAM celebrates America’s workers with disabilities both past and present, and emphasizes the importance of inclusive policies and practices to ensure that all Americans who want to work can work, and have access to services and supports to enable them to do so. With continued advances in such supports, including accessible technology, it’s easier than ever before for America’s employers to hire people with disabilities in high-demand jobs.

NDEAM traces its beginnings to 1945, when Congress declared the first week in October "National Employ the Physically Handicapped Week." In 1962, the use of the word physically ceased in order to include individuals with all types of disabilities. In 1988, Congress expanded the week to a month and changed the name to NDEAM. In 2001, the department established ODEP and it assumed responsibility for NDEAM, which includes annual theme selection to facilitate advanced event planning by businesses and community organizations that support the employment of people with disabilities.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. KATHER

YN ELIZAB ETH SHER

M AN, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-30135

D.C . No. 4:13-c r-00065-B M M -5 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M o nta

na B ria n M . M orris, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d August 31, 2015 ** Se attle , W a s hington B e fore : GOODW IN, GOULD, a nd IKUTA, C irc uit Judge s. Kathe ryn Eliz a

be th She rm an a

ppe a ls he r se nte n c e on he r c onvic tion, pursua nt to a guilty ple a , for c onspira c y to submi t fa lse c la im s a ga i nst the Unite d Stat e s in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . § 286. 

# FIL ED SEP 03 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).She rm an’ s attorne y ha s m ove d to withdra w pursua nt to A nde rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), a sse rting tha t the re are no non-frivolous grounds to a ppe a l. She rm an file d a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. The gove rnm e nt file d no a nswe r brie f. B e c a use our indepe nde nt re vie w of the re c ord indic ate s tha t the ple a a gre e m e nt, inc luding thewa ive r of the right to a ppe a l, wa s e nte re d knowingly and volunta rily , U nite d State

s v . Aguilar-Muniz , 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th C ir.1998), we e nforc e the wa ive r, GR

ANT c ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w, a nd DISM ISS the a ppe a l. DISM I SSE D.

2
159 A.3d 886

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. IRONE WATFORD, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 1, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
BENNIE LEONARD MASSEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-2588

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 4, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela Cox, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Mark Graham Hanson, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is brought under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Having reviewed the record on appeal, we find no preserved error in either 
2

Appellant’s judgment or sentence warranting reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. 

However, we note that Anders counsel pointed out a potentially meritorious but 

unpreserved cost sentencing error in the initial Anders brief, but failed to take steps 

to either correct or preserve the error by filing a motion under Florida Rule of 

Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) before this case was perfected and sent to the panel 

for review. Accordingly, while we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence, we do 

so without prejudice to Appellant’s right to seek timely collateral relief. See Ramos 

v. State, 156 So. 3d 591, 592 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (affirming unpreserved sentencing 

error without prejudice to defendant’s right to file appropriate post-conviction 

motion). See also Collando-Pena v. State, 141 So. 3d 229, 230-32 (Fla. 1st DCA 

2014). 

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.