alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12-2**
CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 and 15d-14
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Michael Siu, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December31, 2004 of Tramford International Limited (the “Registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial informationincluded in this annual report fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;  4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior tothe filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and  (c) presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures basedon our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe Registrant’s internal controls; and
 

 

 6. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factorsthat could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.   Date: June 30, 2005           /s/ Michael Siu    Name: Michael Siu     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


CERTICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Tilden Associates, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Robert
Baskind, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert Baskind
-----------------------
Robert Baskind,
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2005
# Hall of Fame inductee helped expand mission, provide humanitarian support

/ Published June 24, 2019
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
A career that helped modernize the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution mission and provide years of support to humanitarian aid earned Patrick McCormick a position in the 2019 DLA Hall of Fame.Beginning a civilian career as a warehouse worker led McCormick to DLA, where he rose to the role of director of DLA Distribution Operations. Along the way, he took on leadership of 25 distribution centers and helped establish the organization’s mapping mission and first distribution center outside the continental United States, according to his nomination packet.The one center was just the first. The Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, location would eventually be joined by locations spearheaded by McCormick’s teams in Italy, Guam, Kuwait, Southwest Asia, Korea Afghanistan, Bahrain and Djibouti.His work during Operation Enduring Freedom helped ensure an increased and uninterrupted flow of supplies, all with a 17% decrease in costs. Efforts also went toward establishing an electronic total asset visibility method to make automated tracking systems more efficient, as well as starting an inventory integrity improvement program to reduce inventory record adjustments.Later in his career, McCormick’s most remarkable accomplishments revolved around supporting humanitarian assistance, according to the packet. Hurricanes Gustav, Hanna, Ike and Sandy required coordination and delivery of relief supplies. Operation United Assistance had the team arrange for, store and receive materials used for Ebola treatment units in Liberia and Senegal.“He was a true measure of professionalism daily and under intense pressure during contingency operations in the [U.S. Central Command area of responsibility], natural disasters and the Ebola crisis,” former DLA Distribution Commander Army Brig. Gen. Richard Dix said in the packet. “He made a lasting contribution and left a tremendous legacy within DLA that will be difficult to duplicate.”*Read more about the DLA Hall of Fame and previous inductees on the DLA Hall of Fame website.*
# L_2011199DE.01007601.xml

| 2.8.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 199/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 199/76

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses 2011/184/EU der Kommission vom 24. März 2011 über die Zuteilung von Mengen geregelter Stoffe, deren Einfuhr oder Herstellung für die Verwendung zu Labor- und Analysezwecken in der Union 2011 gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1005/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über Stoffe, die zum Abbau der Ozonschicht führen, zugelassen wird

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 79 vom 25. März 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 79 vom 25. März 2011

Seite 14, Erwägungsgrund 1 Satz 2:

anstatt:

„Die Kommission hat festzulegen, welche Mengen geregelter Stoffe außer Fluorchlorkohlenwasserstoffen für wesentliche Labor- und Analysezwecke verwendet werden dürfen und welche Unternehmen sie verwenden dürfen.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Kommission hat festzulegen, welche Mengen geregelter Stoffe außer teilhalogenierten Fluorchlorkohlenwasserstoffen für wesentliche Labor- und Analysezwecke verwendet werden dürfen und welche Unternehmen sie verwenden dürfen.“

Seite 14, Erwägungsgrund 3 Satz 2:

anstatt:

„Da diese Mengen Fluorchlorkohlenwasserstoffe umfassen, die für Labor- oder Analysezwecke lizenziert sind, sollten Herstellung und Einfuhr von Fluorchlorkohlenwasserstoffen für solche Zwecke auch unter diesen Beschluss fallen.“

muss es heißen:

„Da diese Mengen teilhalogenierte Fluorchlorkohlenwasserstoffe umfassen, die für Labor- oder Analysezwecke lizenziert sind, sollten Herstellung und Einfuhr von teilhalogenierten Fluorchlorkohlenwasserstoffen für solche Zwecke auch unter diesen Beschluss fallen.“

---
160 A.3d 698

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHRISTOPHER J. MASON, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Alaska Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Alaska Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 5      | 5      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 
  7.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
of China Technology Development Group Corporation (the Registrant);
 8.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;
 9.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this annual report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;
 10.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the Registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;
 (b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date);
and
 (c)
    
    presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 11.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
data and have identified for the Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and
 (b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Registrants internal controls; and
 12.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether
or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.
  /s/ Alan LiName:
    Alan LiTitle:
    Executive Director and Co-Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP95-112-022]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

January 15, 1998.
    Take notice that on January 9, 1998, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, the 
following tariff sheets, with an effective date of January 1, 1998:

Fifth Revised Volume No. 1
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 26
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 26A
Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 26B

Original Volume No. 2
Thirty-Fourth Revised Sheet No. 5

    Tennessee states that this filing is in compliance with the 
Stipulation and Agreement approved by the Commission in its October 30, 
1996 Order on Contested Settlement in the above-referenced docket. 
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, 77 FERC para. 61,083 (1996), reh'g 
denied, 78 FERC para. 61,069 (1997). Tennessee requests waiver of the 
Commission's thirty-day notice requirement to allow an effective date 
of January 1, 1998 for the tariff sheets. Tennessee submits that good 
cause exists for the waiver because: (1) The proposed tariff sheets 
represent a reduction in customers' existing rates; (2) all of 
Tennessee's customers were informed of the rates since such rates were 
set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement; and (3) the Commission 
previously approved implementation of the rates, effective January 1, 
1998, in its orders approving the Stipulation and Agreement.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in Determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
this proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1448 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Israel (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Israel (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 3,270  | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 15,834 | 8,906  | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2015-0313.

#### Moskowitz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2014-1160. Reported at 150 Ohio St.3d 69, 2017-Ohio-4002, 78 N.E.3d 870. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
#### Linda DiStefano, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v Nabisco, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[767 NYS2d 891]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for emotional distress, the plaintiff Linda DiStefano, as guardian of John C. DiStefano II, appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner,. J.), entered October 8, 2002, as, upon an order of the same court dated August 21, 2002, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted by her on behalf of the infant plaintiff.

*485Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

New York recognizes claims to recover damages for emotional distress *(see Ferrara v Galluchio,*5 NY2d 16, 21 [1958]). However, a plaintiff must produce evidence which is sufficient to guarantee the genuineness of the claim *(see Johnson v State of New York,*37 NY2d 378, 383-384 [1975]). To maintain a cause of action to recover damages for emotional distress following exposure to a toxic substance, a plaintiff must establish both that he or she was in fact exposed to a disease-causing agent and that there is a “rational basis” for his or her fear of contracting a disease *(see Prato v Vigliotta,*253 AD2d 746, 748 [1998]; *Abusio v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.,*238 AD2d 454 [1997]; *Wolff v A-One Oil,*216 AD2d 291, 292 [1995]). This Court has construed “rational basis” to mean “the clinically-demonstrable presence of a toxin in the plaintiffs body, or some other indication of a toxin-induced disease” *(Prato v Vigliotta, supra*at 748; *see e.g. Abusio v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., supra).*

In opposition to the defendants’ prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, although the plaintiff established that the infant plaintiff was exposed to volatile organic compounds (hereinafter VOC), she presented neither clinical evidence of some physical manifestation of VOC contamination *(see Prato v Vigliotta, supra),*nor evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to establish a triable issue of fact regarding some other indication of a toxin-induced disease *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Accordingly, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether there was a “rational basis” for the infant plaintiff’s fear of developing a disease.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donnell Genyard, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 422]

Application by the appellant dated July 5, 2016, for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 31, 2011 *(People v Genyard,*84 AD3d 1398 [2011]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 17, 2007.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*
      *761463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Dillon, J.P., Sgroi, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 15

- 00016

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 76th District Court Titus County, Texas Trial Court No. 37,692

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R Appellant Father appeals from the termination of his parental rights to S.S. The clerk’s record in this accelerated appeal was filed February 27, 2015, and the reporter’s record was filed March 31, 2015, making Father’s brief due April 20, 2015. Having received neither Father’s brief nor a motion to extend the dead line for filing that brief, our clerk’s office contacted counsel via email and voicemail, advising that Father’s brief was late and that a motion for extension of time in which to file such brief had not been filed. Counsel did not respond to these messag es, has not filed a brief, and has not filed a motion for extension of time in which to file a brief. This is an appeal from the termination of Father’s parental rights to S.S., which, by statute, is accelerated. See T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN . § 109.002(a) (We st 2014). Further, under Rule 6.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration, we are required, “so far as reasonably possible, [to] ensure that the appeal is brought to final disposition” within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed. See T EX
. R. J UD
. A DMIN
. 6.2 , reprinted in T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. tit. 2, subtit. F app. (West 2013) . After weighing these considerations, we feel compelled to order the brief filed. By this order, we set the final deadline for filing appellant’s brief as May 11, 2015, which gives counsel twenty

- one days from the original due date to complete the brief. Should appellant fail to file a brief on or before May 11, 2015 , this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT Date: April 2 8 , 2015