alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Environmental cleanup updates discussed at virtual quarterly public meeting 

/ Published July 23, 2020
RICHMOND, VA, 
Community members virtually attended the Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond’s Environmental Cleanup Program quarterly Restoration Advisory Board meeting July 13. Due to COVID-19, this is the first time the RAB has met since Oct. 21.

DLA established a RAB for Defense Supply Center Richmond in January 2002 to provide a forum for the community involvement in DSCR’s Environmental Cleanup Program. 

David Hufford, environmental engineer with the installation’s Environmental Office, opened the meeting by giving an update to several ongoing projects, including DSCR groundwater sampling, as well as updates on cleanup efforts at various locations on the installation. He also touched on the five-year review that’s ongoing and gave an update on the pending Community Involvement Plan.

James Spencer from the engineering firm Architecture, Engineering, Consulting, Operations, and Maintenance gave an update on Operable Unit 6, one of multiple sites monitored for contaminates by Hufford’s office. This update included remedial actions completed to date and planned remedy optimization activities. 

As an advisory board, the RAB makes suggestions, recommendations, and comments on issues concerning investigations and remediation activities. It is made up of local citizens, DLA representatives, business groups and personnel from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineering, the Environmental Protection Agency, Virginia’s Department of Environmental Quality and Chesterfield County. The RAB is co-chaired by a DSCR representative and a community representative.

The next RAB is scheduled for October 19.
Kansas City Southern Railway
Co. and s



# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

December 18, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00354

- CV

Luz CHAVEZ , Individually, and as Representative of th e Estates of Rudolph Chavez, Sr. (Deceased) and Rudolph Chavez, Jr. (Deceased), and as Next Friend of Joel Chavez, a minor; Darlene Chavez; Allen Chavez; Francisco Chavez; and Celia Chavez, Appellant s

v.

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO . and Jose Juarez, Appellee s

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2007

- CVE

- 000347

- D4 Honorable Oscar J Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellees’ Objections to and Motion to Strike Documents Submitted with Appellants’
Brief are CARRIED WITH THIS APPEAL.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 18th day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14781]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request

May 26, 1998.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 6, 1998 to 
be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0137.
    Form Number: IRS Form 2032.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Contract Coverage Under Title II of the Social Security Act.
    Description: American employers can enter into an agreement to 
extend social security coverage to U.S. citizens and resident aliens 
abroad by foreign affiliates.
    Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for-
profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 160.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:

Recordkeeping--2 hrs., 9 min.
Learning about the law or the form--24 min.
Preparing and sending the form to the IRS--27 min.

    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 480 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-14781 Filed 6-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Com. v. Johnson

08/23/2016

158 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 199
#### Board of Directors of Windsor Owners Corp., Respondent, v Elaine Platt, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 293]

*646Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jennifer G. Schecter, J.), entered on or about May 17, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff’s motion to hold defendant in civil contempt for violation of a permanent injunction order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This appeal is based on admitted disclosures of attorney/ client communications by defendant Platt — a former board member of plaintiff Board of Directors of Windsor Owners Corp. (Board) — to a cooperative shareholder and Platt’s violation of a permanent injunction order that specifically enjoined her from making such disclosures.

The vast majority of defendant’s arguments on appeal are an impermissible collateral attack on the underlying permanent injunction order, from which she did not appeal. The validity of an order underlying a contempt proceeding may not be attacked except on the ground that the court entering it was without jurisdiction to do so or that the order had been stayed *(see e.g. Gottlieb v Gottlieb,*137 AD3d 614, 618 [1st Dept 2016]; *Seril v Belnord Tenants Assn.,*139 AD2d 401, 401 [1st Dept 1988]). Accordingly, defendant’s arguments designed to collaterally attack the preliminary injunction order will not be entertained.

Defendant’s contentions that she should not be held in contempt for violating the permanent injunction order also fail. There is no legitimate defense to defendant’s violation of the literal terms of the permanent injunction order, which she fully admits. Judiciary Law § 753 does not require a showing of wilfulness or monetary harm as a precondition to a finding of civil contempt *(see also El-Dehdan v El-Dehdan,*26 NY3d 19, 34-36 [2015]). Indeed, in *El-Dehdan,*the Court of Appeals specifically stated that the Court had “not imposed a wilfulness requirement” for a civil contempt finding *(id.*at 34).

Platt’s arguments based on a lack of harm to the Board also fail. Civil contempt is established, regardless of the contemnor’s motive, when “disobedience of the court’s order 'defeats, impairs, impedes, or prejudices the rights or remedies of a party’ ” *(El-Dehdan,*26 NY3d at 35). The motion court determined that plaintiff showed that it suffered potential harm from Platt’s disclosures and that Platt’s disclosures to Mazzocchi had strengthened his lawsuits against the Board and caused the Board to incur additional legal fees in defending against them.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.

*647Motion to strike reply brief denied as moot.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 55479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Sunshine Act Meetings

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Time And Place: Monday, September 29, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. The meeting 
will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1125, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20571.

Open Agenda Items: Item No. 1: PEFCO Secured Notes Resolutions for FY 
2015.

Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public observation 
for Item No. 1 only.

Further Information: Members of the public who wish to attend the 
meeting should call Joyce Stone, Office of the Secretariat, 811 Vermont 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3336 by close of business 
Tuesday, September 23, 2013.

Lloyd Ellis,
Program Specialist, Office of the General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-22108 Filed 9-12-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Chibatto, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 682]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered September 8, 2014, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent felony offender, to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the persistent felony offender adjudication and sentence, and sentencing defendant, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, and otherwise affirmed.

While the court did not comply with the protocols for handling a jury note laid out in *People v O’Rama (78*NY2d 270, 276 [1991]), the on-the-record statements of the court and parties make clear that there had been an off-the-record conference regarding the note, and those on-the-record statements indicate that the court had apprised the parties of the entire contents of the note during the off-the-record conference *(see People v Walston,*23 NY3d 986, 989 [2014]). Accordingly, defendant’s claim that the court violated the *O’Rama*procedures required preservation under the circumstances, and we decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that defendant was not prejudiced by the lack of full compliance with the *O’Rama*procedures.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it gave the jury an unrequested supplemental instruction after deliberations had begun, and defendant has not shown any prejudice *(see People v Echevarria,*136 AD3d 589 [1st Dept 2016], *lv denied*27 NY3d 1131 [2016]). The instruction, which the court had inadvertently omitted, was legally correct, and the court avoided any prejudice by advising the jury to draw no inference from the fact that the instruction was being delivered belatedly.

We find that sentencing defendant as a persistent felony offender was an improvident exercise of discretion.

Concur— Acosta, J.R, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
#### Ross DiMaggio, Respondent, v Skanska USA Building, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Park Avenue Building & Roofing Supplies, Inc., Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 345]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered October 9, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the branch of defendant Park Avenue Building & Roofing Supplies, Inc.’s (Park Avenue) motion for summary judgment that sought dismissal of the common-law negligence claim and the common-law indemnification and contribution cross claims against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Park Avenue dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it.

Plaintiff, employed by a nonparty, testified that he fell after he picked up a pipe, stepped to his right, and slipped on a muddy, softball-sized, chopped-up piece of concrete. Plaintiff never testified that he could not use lifting equipment available to him because of the way the pipes had been stacked. Accordingly, the connection between Park Avenue’s alleged negligence in placing the pipes and plaintiff’s injury is too attenuated to conclude that Park Avenue’s malfeasance proximately caused the accident *(see Escalet v New York City Hous. Auth.,*56 AD3d 257, 258 [1st Dept 2008]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tony McQueen, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 873]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Donnelly, J.), imposed June 2, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid *(see People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]; *People v Black,*144 AD3d 935 [2016]; *People v Brown,*122 AD3d 133, 138-141 [2014]), and thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Hall, Austin, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.
NO. 12-15-00138-CR

ON APPEAL FROM THE 123rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SHELBY COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. 2014-CR-19231

JUAN MERINO §

§

IN THE 12TH COURT OF APPEALS

§ OF

vs. §

§

STATE OF TEXAS § TYLER, TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Juan Merino, Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, 

and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file appellant's brief, pursuant 

to Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and for good cause shows 

the following:

1. This case is on appeal from the 123rd District Court of Shelby County, 

Texas.

2. The case below was styled the STATE OF TEXAS vs. Juan Merino, 

and numbered 2014-CR-19231. Appellant was convicted of Aggravated Sexual 

Assault. 

4. Appellant was assessed a sentence of Sixty (60) years in Texas 

Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division on April 16, 2015. 

5. Notice of appeal was given on April 23, 2015. 

6. The clerk's record was filed on June 3, 2015 and a supplemental clerk’s 

record was filed on June 29, 2015; the reporter's record was filed on July 14, 2015 

and the reporter’s exhibits were filed on July 15, 2015. 

ACCEPTED

12-15-00138-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

8/12/2015 2:57:04 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 8/12/2015 2:57:04 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
7. The appellate brief was presently due on August 13, 2015.

8. Appellant requests an extension of time of thirty (30) days from the 

current due date.

9. No extensions to file the brief have been received in this cause.

10. Defendant is currently incarcerated.

11. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause for the requested

extension:

Counsel currently has ten separate briefs due in the 12th Court of Appeals and 

the 9th Court of Appeals, which include four due in to the this court in the month of 

August. Due to the time required to review records of each appeal, counsel is 

requesting an extension of thirty days.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this 

Court grant this Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief, and for such other 

and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

Respectfully submitted:

 /s/John D. Reeves

____________________

John D. Reeves

Attorney at Law

1007 Grant

Lufkin, Texas 75901

Phone (936) 632-160

Fax: (936) 632-1640

tessabellus@yahoo.com

SBOT # 16723000

Counsel for Appellant
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. 10.1 (5), certify that I, the undersigned conferred 

with opposing counsel who is not opposed to an extension.

/s/John D. Reeves

___________________________

John D. Reeves

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellant’s 

Motion to Extend Time to file Appellant’s Brief on this 12th day of August, 2015 

forwarded to State’s Attorney, Kenneth B. Florence, Shelby County, by electronic 

service at shelbyda@sbcglobal.net.

/s/John D. Reeves

__________________________

John D. Reeves

Attorney for Appellant, 

Juan Merino
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Maine Acadian Culture Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (PL 92-463) that the Maine Acadian Culture Preservation 
Commission will meet on Friday, June 12, 1998. The meeting will convene 
at 7:00 PM at the University of Maine, Cyr Hall, Room 205, on Pleasant 
Street, Fort Kent, Aroostook County, Maine.
    The Maine Acadian Culture Preservation Commission was appointed by 
the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Maine Acadian Culture 
Preservation Act (PL 101-543). The purpose of the Commission is to 
advise the National Park Service with respect to the implementation of 
an interpretive program of Acadian culture in the state of Maine, and 
the proceedings of a joint meeting with the Maine Acadian Heritage 
Council. The agenda for this meeting is as follows:
    1. Review of April 10, 1998 summary report.
    2. Speaker: Maurice Basque of Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada on 
``New Research Directions on Acadian Culture''.
    3. Report of the National Park Service Project Staff.
    4. Opportunity for public comment.
    5. Proposed agenda, place, and date of the next Commission Meeting.
    The meeting is open to the public. Further information concerning 
Commission meetings may be obtained from the Superintendent, Acadia 
National Park. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations 
to the Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be 
made at least seven days prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, 
Acadia National Park, P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, ME 04609-0177; 
telephone (207) 288-5472.

    Dated: May 27, 1998.
Len Bobinchock,
Acting Superintendent, Acadia National Park.
[FR Doc. 98-15127 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
# 2019 Shred Day success

/ Published May 28, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
                Shred Day                            The Defense Supply Center Columbus Environmental Division collaborated with Morale, Welfare and Recreation to save 27 cubic yards of paper from entering the local landfill May 15. Shred Day was open to all DSCC associates for personal shredding and employees recycled 13,165 pounds of paper, which is equivalent to 6.5 tons. Additionally, nine cubic yards of cardboard were recycled from environmentally conscious donors. The contract with a qualified shredding company that ensured personal identifiable information security allowed employees to securely dispose of documents with personal information while also ensuring the paper is recycled.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Dana ThornburyVIRIN: 190524-D-HV615-500The Defense Supply Center Columbus Environmental Division collaborated with Morale, Welfare and Recreation to save 27 cubic yards of paper from entering the local landfill May 15.

Shred Day was open to all DSCC associates for personal shredding and employees recycled 13,165 pounds of paper, which is equivalent to 6.5 tons. 

Additionally, nine cubic yards of cardboard were recycled from environmentally conscious donors. 

The contract with a qualified shredding company that ensured personal identifiable information security allowed employees to securely dispose of documents with personal information while also ensuring the paper is recycled.
#### Yukon Shoulars, Appellant, v St. Barnabas Hospital, Respondent. (And Other Actions.)

[50 NYS3d 276]

Appeals from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered March 17, 2015, which granted defendant’s motions for summary judgment dismissing the medical malpractice claims of plaintiffs Shoulars, Ancrum, Kennedy, Sterlin, and Rice, and from order, same court and Justice, entered April 2, 2015, which granted defendant’s motions for summary judgment dismissing the civil rights claims of all plaintiffs, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the rules of practice of this Court makes meaningful review of the orders appealed from impossible and leaves us no option but to dismiss these consolidated appeals. As far as we can discern from the notices of appeal in plaintiffs’ appendix, the appendix should contain 11 orders and two transcripts. However, there are only two orders, as indicated above *(see*22 NYCRR 600.10 [c] [2] [i]). Moreover, while the April 2, 2015 order incorporates by refer*578ence the transcript of the oral argument on defendants’ motions, the complete transcript is not contained in the appendix; the portion of the argument in which the court set forth its rulings is not included. Nor does plaintiffs’ appendix contain the pleadings or medical records in connection with defendant’s motions, which sought summary dismissal of medical malpractice claims (22 NYCRR 600.10 [c] [2] [ii]; *see also*CPLR 5528 [a] [5]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14613]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Delaware and Lehigh Navigation Canal National Heritage Corridor 
Commission Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware and 
Lehigh Navigation Canal National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice 
of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463).

MEETING DATE AND TIME: Friday, June 12, 1998; 1:30-4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Wilkes University, Darte Center of the Performing Arts, 
Corners of South River and South Streets, Wilkes-Barre, PA 18766.
    The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the 
Management Action Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh Canal National 
Heritage Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was 
established to assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its 
political subdivisions in planning and implementing an integrated 
strategy for protecting and promoting cultural, historic and natural 
resources. The Commission reports to the Secretary of the Interior and 
to Congress.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Delaware and Lehigh Navigation Canal 
National Heritage Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 
100-692, November 18, 1988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Executive Director, Delaware and 
Lehigh Navigation Canal National Heritage Corridor Commission, 10 E. 
Church Street, Room A-1208, Bethlehem, PA 18018, (610) 861-9345.

    Dated: May 26, 1998.
Gerald R. Bastoni,
Executive Director, Delaware and Lehigh Navigation Canal NHC 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-14613 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
```
No. 12-8121.

#### Bell *v.*Jones et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.