alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Champlain, NY Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Champlain, NY Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0      | 63     | 26     | 197    | 38     | 30     | 10    
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 61     | 56     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2017-0128.

#### State v. Moody.

Montgomery App. No. 26926, 2016-Ohio-8366.
# Employees enjoy fluffy pancakes and fellowship for holidays

/ Published Dec. 11, 2019
Battle Creek, Michigan, 
Defense Logistics Agency employees in the Breakfast Capital of the World gathered Dec. 10 for their annual Holiday Pancake Breakfast.

DLA Disposition Services Director Mike Cannon partnered with Chief of Staff Peter Foreman to cook and serve the pancakes while Operations Director Arthur Welsh handed out the sausage links. When asked the secret to a perfect pancake, Cannon said “have Pete make them.” Foreman said his secret ingredient is “practice,” but others say he uses carbonated water to make them fluffy.

Karin DeGraw, the first employee served, confirmed Foreman’s pancakes were “fluffy and round” as she explained why she steered toward his batch. DeGraw said part of the advantage of being the first was “getting my choice between the chefs and all the best items.”

This was DeGraw’s first time attending the holiday breakfast. She said it was “absolutely great” and plans to return next year.

Among the tasty foods employees could choose to go with their pancakes were the cookies and pies from the bake off.  Among the selections was a platter of “Big Mac & Fries” that were sandwich cookies made to look like the famous burgers paired with pretzels that looked like French fries. Jodi Ward earned second place for her not-so-fast food.  First place went to Angie Wilbur for her chocolate peanut butter macaroons and Kayla DesVoignes’ “Gingerdoodles” took third place.

Like most Christmas meals there was pecan pie, but the awards for the cook off went to other kinds. First place went to Rachael Sosa for her peanut butter pie, Janine DesVoignes’ coconut cream pie was second and Kayla DesVoignes’ key lime pie was third.

The first place award for “Most Elegant” wreath went to Adrianne Gelletich and second place was awarded to April Stark.

Awards for the “Most Creative” wreath went to the Contracting Directorate staff, who took first place, and Lisa Petch took second place for her entry honoring those who are deployed. The first place wreath had features like a tire to give it the right shape, ornaments that reflected aspects of contracting, and the lyrics to holiday carol written by the staff, “The Twelve Months of the Fiscal Year.”

Cannon said he liked how staff used a tire to note recent challenges in tire recycling and how the carol lyrics have phrases like “11 drums of hazardous waste” instead of “11 lords a leaping.”

Before wrapping up the event, Cannon thanked everyone for coming and enjoying time together. He also encouraged them to enjoy time with family during the holidays and “be safe.”
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1817

To amend subchapter II of chapter 73 of title 10, United States Code,

to prevent cost-of-living increases in the survivor annuity contributions

of uniformed services retirees from becoming effective before related

cost-of-living increases in retired pay become payable.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 2 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Mr. ROBB introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend subchapter II of chapter 73 of title 10, United

States Code, to prevent cost-of-living increases in the

survivor annuity contributions of uniformed services retirees from becoming effective before related cost-of-living

increases in retired pay become payable.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1817 IS

1 SECTION 1. COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES IN SBP CONTRIBU2 TIONS TO BE EFFECTIVE CONCURRENTLY

3 WITH PAYMENT OF RELATED RETIRED PAY

4 COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES.

5 (a) SURVIVOR BENEFIT PLAN.—Section 1452(h) of

6 title 10, United States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(h)’’; and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 section:

10 ‘‘(2)(A) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), when the

11 initial payment of an increase in retired pay under section

12 1401a of this title (or any other provision of law) to a

13 person is later than the effective date of that increase by

14 reason of the application of subsection (b)(2)(B) of such

15 section, then the amount of the reduction in the person’s

16 retired pay shall be effective on the date of that initial

17 payment of the increase in retired pay rather than the ef18 fective date of the increase in retired pay.

19 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) may not be construed as de20 laying, for purposes of determining the amount of a

21 monthly annuity under section 1451 of this title, the effec22 tive date of an increase in a base amount under subsection

23 (h) of such section from the effective date of an increase

24 in retired pay under section 1401a of this title to the date

25 on which the initial payment of that increase in retired
3

•S 1817 IS

1 pay is made in accordance with subsection (b)(2)(B) of

2 such section 1401a.’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall take effect with respect to retired pay

5 payable for months beginning on or after the date of the

6 enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### George Fernet et al., Appellants, v Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Respondent.

[629 NYS2d 860]

—White, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Plumadore, J.), entered May 10, 1994 in Saratoga County, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Plaintiffs commenced this personal injury action to recover damages and derivative losses they allegedly incurred as the result of a work-related injury plaintiff George Fernet sustained when he fell from a platform that was about eight feet above the floor of the building in which he was working that was owned by defendant. Following some discovery, plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment on their Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Supreme Court denied the motion, prompting this appeal.

We affirm. We have recently reaffirmed our adherence to the rule that where, as here, scaffolding is less than 20 feet from the ground or floor and there is no evidence that it was defective or otherwise failed to perform its function of elevating the workers and their materials, the issue of whether safety rails or other protective devices were necessary to provide proper protection is generally a question of fact *(see, Beesimer v Albany Ave./ Rte. 9 Realty,*216 AD2d 853; *see also, Blair v Rosen-Michaels, Inc.,*146 AD2d 863, 865). This case is not an exception to this rule since plaintiffs presented no evidence on the necessity for safety rails or other devices or whether the absence of such devices was the proximate cause of Fernet’s *880injury. The case of *Wright v State of New York*(66 NY2d 452) upon which plaintiffs rely is inapposite, for the holding therein is predicated upon affirmed findings that the absence of a guardrail or other safety device resulted in the denial of proper safety protection to the claimant and that such absence was the proximate cause of his injury *(supra,*at 461).

We further note that because plaintiffs did not make a prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment, defendant was under no obligation to come forward with evidentiary proof creating a triable issue of fact *(see, Christiana v Joyce Intl.,*198 AD2d 690, 691).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
*January 31, 2018*

2018-Ohio-365.]

2017-0684.

#### Satterfield v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104211, 2017-Ohio-928. Cause accepted on proposition of law Nos. I and III.

Kennedy, French, and DeWine, JJ., would accept the cause on all propositions of law.

Fischer, J., would accept the cause on proposition of law No. I only.

O’Connor, C.J., dissents.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
**Exhibit
      32(b)**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of ALLTEL Corporation (the
      Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
      I, Sharilyn S. Gasaway, Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer
      of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;


and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of


operations
      of the Company.








/s/
      Sharilyn S. Gasaway


Sharilyn
      S. Gasaway


Executive
      Vice President - Chief Financial Officer


May
      9,
      2006



































A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      ALLTEL Corporation and will be retained by ALLTEL Corporation and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### Igor Bykov et al., Respondents, v Sylvia Brody, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[51 NYS3d 900]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Sylvia Brody appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (King, J.), dated March 17, 2016, as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

*809Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The evidence that the defendant Sylvia Brody (hereinafter the defendant) submitted in support of her summary judgment motion, which included her own affidavit and the affidavit of her husband, Joseph Brody, as well as the transcript of the deposition of the plaintiff Igor Bykov, was insufficient to establish her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. “Resolving questions of credibility, determining the accuracy of witnesses, and reconciling the testimony of witnesses are for the trier of fact” *(Kahan v Spira,*88 AD3d 964, 966 [2011]; *see Lewanoni v Liotine,*125 AD3d 941 [2015]).

In light of the defendant’s failure to meet her prima facie burden, her motion was properly denied without consideration of the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ opposition papers *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Balkin, J.P., Cohen, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.
*May 12, 2017*

2017-Ohio-2777.]

2016-1608.

#### Cole SN Canton Ohio, L.L.C. v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2015-2046. On joint motion to remand the appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals in order to implement a settlement. Cause remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to take further action as appropriate.
# L_2011276EN.01006201.xml

| 21.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 276/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 276/62

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION

of 20 October 2011

amending Implementing Decision 2011/303/EU as regards the date of application

(notified under document C(2011) 7373)

(Only the Dutch text is authentic)

(2011/700/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 43(m), in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Commission Implementing Decision 2011/303/EU (2) the use of new methods for grading pig carcasses in the Netherlands was authorised. That Decision is to apply from 3 October 2011. On 9 September 2011 the competent authorities of the Netherlands informed the Commission about practical problems in several slaughterhouses with the timely implementation of the new methods and asked to postpone the application until 2 January 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Commission Implementing Decision 2011/303/EU (2) the use of new methods for grading pig carcasses in the Netherlands was authorised. That Decision is to apply from 3 October 2011. On 9 September 2011 the competent authorities of the Netherlands informed the Commission about practical problems in several slaughterhouses with the timely implementation of the new methods and asked to postpone the application until 2 January 2012.

| (2) | Implementing Decision 2011/303/EU should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Implementing Decision 2011/303/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 4 of Implementing Decision 2011/303/EU, ‘3 October 2011’ is replaced by ‘2 January 2012’.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Done at Brussels, 20 October 2011.

For the Commission

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 136, 24.5.2011, p. 95.

2

---
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michelle Fox, on Behalf of Samy Martinez-Jacquez, Appellant, v Joseph Ponte, Respondent.

[53 NYS3d 544]

Appeal from judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), entered on or about September 8, 2016, denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 70, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

This challenge to a bail court’s refusal, on the ground of insufficient collateral, to approve a bail bond is moot because the bail court has entered a subsequent order that increased the amount of bail, and rendered the prior bond inapplicable. We do not find that an exception to the mootness doctrine should apply *(see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Furthermore, because the existence of the superseding order would make it impossible to grant petitioner immediate release, habeas corpus relief would not be available *(see People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent,*50 NY2d 901 [1980]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY INCLUDED IN ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           180,075
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      18,286
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 213,094
<CASH>                                           3,578
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               4,935
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 446,617
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                358,744
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              5,794
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            5,395
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 32,675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   446,617
<PREMIUMS>                                      97,321
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             12,770
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 687
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  33,995
<BENEFITS>                                      65,152
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            60,675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,692
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,717
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,975
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1,250)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (1,485)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,240
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 257,935
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             69,014
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               (3,862)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              14,131
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                60,265
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                248,691
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                         18,233
        

</TABLE>
#### Webber v Webber

4th Dept: 145 AD3d 1499

denied
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 10363 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
EMILIO GARZA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CR

- 261

- 1

Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing his guilty plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, Emilio Garza raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143 (5th Cir. 2013). In Alcantar , 733 F.3d at 145

- 46, we rejected the argument that Nat ’ l Fe d ’ n of Indep

. Bus

. v. Sebelius , 567 U.S. 519 (2012), affected our prior jurisprudence rejecting challenges to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extensio n of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 7, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-10363 Document: 00515302023 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/07/2020
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30243-30244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Request for Nominations of Candidates to Serve on the National 
Vaccine Advisory Committee, Department of Health and Human Services

    The Public Health Service (PHS) is soliciting nominations for 
possible membership on the National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC). 
This committee studies and recommends ways to encourage the 
availability of an adequate supply of safe and effective vaccination 
products in the States; recommends research priorities and other 
measures the Director of the National Vaccine Program should take to 
enhance the safety and efficacy of vaccines; advises the Director of 
the Program in the implementation of sections 2102, 2103, and 2104, of 
the PHS Act; and identifies annually, for the Director of the Program, 
the most

[[Page 30244]]

important areas of government and non-government cooperation that 
should be considered in implementing sections 2102, 2103, and 2104, of 
the PHS Act.
    Nominations are being sought for individuals engaged in vaccine 
research or the manufacture of vaccines or who are physicians, members 
of parent organizations concerned with immunizations, or 
representatives of state or local health agencies or public health 
organizations. Federal employees will not be considered for membership. 
Members may be invited to serve a four-year term.
    Close attention will be given to minority and female 
representation; therefore nominations from these groups are encouraged.
    The following information is requested: name, affiliation, address, 
telephone number, and a current curriculum vitae. Nominations should be 
sent, in writing, and postmarked by June 30, 1998, to: Felecia D. 
Pearson, Committee Management Specialist, NVAC, National Vaccine 
Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 
Clifton Road, NE, M/S D50, Atlanta, Georgia 30333. Telephone and 
facsimile submission cannot be accepted.

    Dated: May 27, 1998.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 98-14670 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P