alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1

                             TILDEN ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


     All of the Company's subsidiaries are wholly-owned.

     Tilden Associates, Inc. Subsidiaries                      Incorporated In

     B.K. 163rd St., Inc. .......................................   Florida
     B.K. 8 Street, Inc. ........................................   Florida
     B.K. Oakland, Inc. .........................................   Florida
     B.K. Pines, Inc. ...........................................   Florida
     B.K. University, Inc. ......................................   Florida
     B.W.B., Inc. ...............................................   Florida
     B.W.S., Inc. B.W.B., Inc. ..................................   Florida
     B.W.O.A., Inc. B.W.B., Inc. ................................   Florida
     B.W. of Palm Beach, Inc. B.W.B., Inc. ......................   Florida
     Garden City Beverage Marketing Corp.........................   New York
     TBW Dixie, Inc. ............................................   Florida
     Tilden 126-14 Merrick Blvd., Inc. ..........................   New York
     Tilden ABS, Inc. ...........................................   New York
     Tilden Brakeshop, Inc. .....................................   New York
     Tilden Brakeworld, Inc. ....................................   New York
     Tilden Broward, Inc. .......................................   Florida
     Tilden Dutch Realty, Inc. ..................................   New York
     Tilden Equipment Corp. .....................................   New York
     Tilden Florida Realty, Inc. ................................   Florida
     Tilden Ft. Lauderdale, Inc. ................................   Florida
     Tilden Hempstead, Inc. .....................................   New York
     Tilden Massapequa, Inc. ....................................   New York
     Tilden NH Realty, Inc. ..................................... New Hampshire
     Tilden Port Chester, Inc. ..................................   New York
     Tilden Realty Corp. ........................................   New York
     Tilden Realty FLA, Inc. ....................................   Florida
     Tilden Realty Georgia, Inc. ................................   Georgia
     Tilden Realty TX, Inc. .....................................    Texas
     Tilden Smithtown, Inc. .....................................   New York
No. 12-7637.

#### David *v.*Byars, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.12 
 Director Compensation (as of May 31, 2006) 
 Each director of the Company receives a per meeting fee of $3,000 for each board meeting attended. The Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid $4,000 per meeting for each Audit committee meeting attended during the year and each committee
member receives $1,000 per meeting attended. The Chairman of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee is paid $2,000 per Compensation Committee meeting attended and members of the Committee is paid $1,000 per meeting attended.
All directors’ fees were paid in shares of common stock based on the market price of the stock on the date of grant by the board. 
 The members of the
Board of Directors are also eligible for reimbursement for their expenses incurred in attending Board meetings in accordance with Company policy. 
 Each
director of the Company also receives stock option grants under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (which shall be referred to as the “Directors’ Plan”). Option grants under the Directors’ Plan are non-discretionary. Each
non-employee director is granted 50,000 stock options on the date he or she joins the Board of Directors. The exercise price of options granted under the Directors’ Plan is 100% of the fair market value of the common stock subject to the option
on the date of the option grant. The standard terms of the plan call for vesting in equal installments over three years and expiring in five years.
Air Force Seeks Industry Insight on Energy-as-a-Service Concept
 
  By Allison Finder
  solicitation number SP0600-19-R-0803 ,             Massachusetts Military Asset and Security Strategy Task Force     here   solicitation number SP0600-19-R-0803    Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Air Force Installation Energy website.
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to India (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to India (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 6.64  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6.07   | 7.40   | 9.96   | 5.92   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Com. v. Moulis

03/23/2016

463 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 110
No. 12-761.

#### POM Wonderful LLC *v.*Coca-Cola Co.

C. A. 9th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### Brown v State of New York

4th Dept: 144 AD3d 1535

granted
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RODERICK HAMILTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2024-0720

July 19, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Frederick P. Mercurio, Judge.

Roderick Hamilton, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessels to Greece (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessels to Greece (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 7.62   | 5.90  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.86   | 7.61   | 14.52  | 5.84   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Graham, Matter of, v Rawley

2d Dept: 143 AD3d 816

denied
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 67 (Thursday, April 8, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17852-17853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-7803]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0405; Airspace Docket No. 09-ASW-17]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Altus, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects the final rule published in the Federal 
Register December 29, 2009, amending Class E airspace in the Altus, OK 
area. The geographic coordinates were incorrect for the Altus 
Localizer. This action corrects that error.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC April 8, 2010. The Director of the 
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center, 
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest 
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History

    On December 29, 2009, the FAA published in the Federal Register a 
final rule amending Class E airspace in the Altus, OK area (74 FR 
68666, Docket No. FAA-2009-0405). Subsequent to publication, an error 
was discovered in the geographic coordinates for the Altus AFB ILS 
Runway 17R Localizer. This action corrects the coordinates. Class E 
airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005, of FAA Order 
7400.9T signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which 
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1.
    In rule FR Doc. E9-30283 published on December 29, 2009, (74 FR 
68666) make the following correction:
    On page 68667, in the first column, under Altus AFB ILS Runway 17R 
Localizer, remove ``Lat. 34[deg]43[min]15[sec] N., long 
99[deg]16[min]26[sec] W.'' and insert ``Lat. 34[deg]38[min]31[sec] N., 
long 99[deg]16[min]26[sec] W.''

[[Page 17853]]

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 29, 2010.
Walter L. Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2010-7803 Filed 4-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
No. 12-8341.

#### Morton *v.*Government of the Virgin Islands.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5

<CIK>                           0000068622
<NAME>                          U S WEST Communications, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                   66
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,765
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                             217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      2,336
<PP&E>                               37,972
<DEPRECIATION>                       21,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       20,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 5,862
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                              8,135
<OTHER-SE>                           (3,632)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         20,360
<SALES>                               2,951
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      2,951
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      2,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         683
<INCOME-TAX>                            258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     425
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                            425
<EPS-BASIC>                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0





</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 02-21200

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 

 Plaintiff - Appellee 

 

 v. 

 

ARTHUR ANDERSEN, LLP 

 

 Defendant - Appellant 

 

 ---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas, Houston

---------------------

Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion for remand to

the United States District Court for the Southern District of

Houston so the government may move to dismiss the indictment

 is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s unopposed motion to 

vacate the order of October 27, 2005, pending disposition of the 

appellee's motion to remand is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s unopposed motion to

issue a revised supplemental briefing schedule that would begin

from the date denying the governments motion for remand giving

the appellant adequate time to submit a supplemental brief 

is DENIED as moot.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 5, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
# Mission-Ready Expeditionary, payload flexible and the most versatile UAS in its class.

Search and Rescue Disaster Response Force Protection Combined Arms Target Following Battle Damage Assessment Pattern of Life Border Security Asset Protection Wildlife Monitoring Agricultural Assessment Communications Relay Networked Operations Anti-Piracy Fire Fighting

## Mark 4 Launcher Trailer mounted, pneumatically actuated, expeditionary



## ICOMC2 Small-footprint command and control



## SkyHook ® No nets, runway-independent recovery system



# One aircraft, infinite possibilities We designed Integrator to be a modular, flexible and multi-mission capable solution for both land and maritime operations. The aircraft’s six payload spaces can be customized with cameras, communication capabilities and other advanced mission-specific technologies to suit your operational needs. And because no nets or runways are required, your footprint stays small, no matter how big your mission. 

# Integrator TM 

## Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS)

16 ft / 4.8 m 8.2 ft / 2.5 mIntegrator is a registered trademark of Insitu. Information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Some technologies may not be available in all areas. Copyright © Insitu, 2015. All rights reserved. CENTER OF GRAVITY BAY NOSE BAY

HARDPOINT WING AND WINGLET BAYS

PR080315 

## Dimensions Length: 8.2 ft / 2.5 m Wingspan: 16 ft / 4.9 m 

## Weights Empty structure weight: 80 lb / 36.28 kg Max takeoff weight: 135 lb / 61.2 kg Max payload weight: 40 lb / 18 kg


## Performance

Endurance: 24+ hours Ceiling: >19,500 ft / 5,944 m Service ceiling: 15,000 ft / 4,572 m Max horizontal speed: 90+ knots / 46.3 m/s Cruise speed: 55 knots / 28.3 m/s Engine: EFI using JP-5/JP-8 fuel 

## Payload Integration On-board power: 350 W for payload On-board connectivity: Ether net (TCP/IP) 

## Baseline Sensor Package

› El ectro-optic imager

› M id-wave infrared imager

› I R marker

› L aser rangefinderInsitu Inc. 118 East Columbia River Way Bingen, WA 98605 USA

+1.509.493.8600 insitu.com contactus@insitu.com 

### Decision-making superiority delivered
EXHIBIT 8.1
  Any other name under which they doCompany
    
    Jurisdiction
    
    businessBHL Solar Technology Company Limited
(BHLHK)
    
    Hong Kong
    
    N/AChina Green Industry Group Limited
(Green Industry)
    
    BVI
    
    N/AChina Green Holdings Limited (Green
Holdings)
    
    BVI
    
    N/ASinofield Group Limited (Sinofield)
    
    BVI
    
    N/ASouthwick International Limited
(Southwick)
    
    BVI
    
    N/ATrenda International Limited
(Trenda)
    
    BVI
    
    N/AShenzhen Helios New Energy
Technology Limited (Shenzhen Helios
Energy)
    
    China
    
    N/AChina Merchants Zhangzhou
Development Zone Trendar Solar Tech
Ltd. (Zhangzhou Trendar Tech)
    
    China
    
    N/AChina Merchants Zhangzhou
Development Zone Trenda Solar Ltd.
(Zhangzhou Trenda)
    
    China
    
    N/AChina Green Investment Group Limited
(Green Investment)
    
    BVI
    
    N/AFaster Assets Limited (Faster
Assets)
    
    BVI
    
    N/AChina Merchants Zhangzhou
Development Zone Broad Shine Solar
Technology Limited (Broad Shine)
    
    China
    
    N/A
#### People v Bell

1st Dept: 149 AD3d 666

denied*
# New ‘Home Team’ video highlights DLA employees continuing agency mission amid COVID-19

/ Published May 11, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The Defense Logistics Agency is providing ongoing support to the national COVID-19 response while continuing to support warfighters and whole-of-government agencies.

This new video highlights employees’ hard work and dedication.

00:29VIDEO  | 00:29 |The Home Team

----
```

[Federal Register: October 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 199)]
[Notices]               
[Page 63516-63517]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15oc10-139]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

 
Institute of Museum and Library Services; Sunshine Act Meeting of 
the National Museum and Library Services Board

AGENCY: Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), NFAH.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the agenda of the forthcoming meeting 
of the National Museum and Library Services Board. This notice also 
describes the function of the Board. Notice of the meeting is required 
under the Sunshine in Government Act.

Time and Date: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 from 9:30 a.m. until 12:30 
p.m.

Agenda: Twenty-First Meeting of the National Museum and Library Service 
Board.

I. Welcome
II. Approval of Minutes
III. Financial Update
IV. Legislative Update
V. Board Program
VI. Board Updates
VII. Adjourn
(Open to the Public)

Place: The meeting will be held in the Board Room at the Institute of 
Museum and Library Services. 1800 M Street, NW., 9th Floor, Washington, 
DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4676.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Lyons, Director of Special 
Events and Board Liaison, Institute of Museum and Library Services, 
1800 M Street, NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 
653-4676 or e-mail: elyons@imls.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Museum and Library Services 
Board is established under the Museum and Library Services Act, 20 
U.S.C. 9101 et seq. The Board advises the Director of the Institute on 
general policies with respect to the duties, powers, and authority of 
the Institute of Museum and Library Services, related to museum and 
library services.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact: Institute of Museum and Library Services, 1800 M Street, NW., 
9th Fl.,

[[Page 63517]]

Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: (202) 653-4676; TDD (202) 653-4614 at 
least seven (7) days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: October 7, 2010.
Nancy E. Weiss,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-26005 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7036-01-M
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00632-CR

Style: Israel Castillo

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: February 25, 2014

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file reporter’s record

Party filing motion: Court reporter

Document to be filed: Reporter’s record

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: October 30, 2013

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: February 14, 2014

Date Requested: March 25, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 No further extensions of time will be granted

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

The record was originally due on October 30, 2013. On January 28, 2014, we

granted the reporter’s request for extension and informed the reporter that no

further extensions would be granted. Accordingly, the motion is denied. If the

record is not filed within 10 days of the date of this order, we may require

the court reporter to appear and show cause why the record has not been filed.

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 4, 2014