alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3


 


BILL OF SALE


 


Seller, ALTRIA CORPORATE SERVICES,
INC. (formerly known as Philip Morris Management Corp.), a New York
corporation, in consideration of Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000.00), receipt
whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby sell, assign, transfer and set over
to Buyer, KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC.,
a Delaware corporation, the personal property described on Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, which personal property
is located on or related to operations at the premises commonly known as Suites
350 and 400 in the Century Building located at 84 N.E. Loop 410, San Antonio,
Texas 78216.


 


Seller hereby represents and warrants to Buyer that said personal property
is free and clear of all liens, charges and encumbrances under or through
Seller, and that Seller has full right, power and authority to sell said
personal property and to make this bill of sale.  All
warranties of quality, fitness, and merchantability are hereby excluded and
said personal property is hereby sold AS IS and WHERE IS.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller has signed and sealed this bill of sale this
24th day of May, 2006.


 


	
   

  	
  ALTRIA CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. (formerly

  known as Philip Morris Management Corp.), a New

  York corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Samuel L. Nickols

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  Samuel L. Nickols

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:
  Senior Director Facilities & Security

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Subscribed and sworn to
  before me

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  this 24th day
  of

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  May, 2006.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Natorsha G. Yates

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Notary
  Public
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,761,236
<SECURITIES>                                   11,574,447
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,644,735
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,980,418
<PP&E>                                         398,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                 108,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,394,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,144,167
<BONDS>                                        4,300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       52,376
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,897,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18,394,162
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,153,416
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15,801,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,351,942
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,474,571
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,877,371
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .36
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15107]



[[Page 31212]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 11546-000 Minnesota]


City of Thief River Falls; Notice of Availability of Final 
Environmental Assessment

June 2, 1998.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the application for an original 
minor license for the proposed Thief River Falls, Municipal Power Dam 
Hydroelectric Project located on the Red Lake River in the City of 
Thief River Falls, Pennington County, Minnesota, and has prepared a 
Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the proposed project.
    Copies of the FEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    For further information, please contact Monte J. TerHaar at (202) 
219-2768.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15107 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Com. v. Corliss11

12/07/2015

630, 631MAL (2015)

11

. Reconsideration Denied January 13, 2016.

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 448
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

ARTICLE 5 FINANCIAL  DATA  SCHEDULE  (FDS) FOR PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 10-Q
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from the March
31, 1998 Form 10-Q, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000067182
<NAME> JOYCE NICHOLS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                     MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                                   738
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          5,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                            2,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       9,392
<PP&E>                                                                49,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        25,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        43,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 12,299
<BONDS>                                                                3,476
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                              659
<COMMON>                                                                 896
<OTHER-SE>                                                            18,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          43,371
<SALES>                                                               13,388<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      13,630<F1>
<CGS>                                                                  8,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          9,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       2,367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        93
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        1,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             529
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      705
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             705
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            .86
<FN>
<F1> SALES AND TOTAL REVENUES INCLUDE $1,351 MILLION OF EXCISE AND
STATE GASOLINE TAXES
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Global Liberty Insurance Co., Appellant, v Therapeutic Physical Therapy, P.C., as Assignee of Bernardo Hidalgo, Respondent.

[49 NYS3d 411]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered October 24, 2016, which denied the petition seeking to vacate the award of a master arbitrator, dated August 12, 2016, to the extent it affirmed a lower arbitrator’s award of no-fault compensation to respondent in the unadjusted amount, of $2,679.39, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition granted to the extent of vacating that portion of the master arbitration award, and the matter remanded to a different arbitrator for arbitration of the fee schedule defense on the merits.

Respondent sought recovery for physical therapy services provided to its assignor before April 1, 2013, and petitioner insurer disclaimed parts of the claim on the ground that it had already reimbursed a different provider for “eight units” for services on some of the same dates. Respondent checked the box on the prescribed disclaimer form indicating that it was relying on a “fee schedule” defense, specifically the “eight unit rule.” The lower arbitrator held that respondent was precluded from asserting its defense because the disclaimer was insufficiently specific in that the other provider was not named. Respondent appealed to the master arbitrator, arguing that it adequately preserved its defense. The master arbitrator, without addressing the issue of preservation, incorrectly found *503that the lower arbitrator had “considered the fee schedule defense” and “determined that [respondent failed to provide evidence as to the other provider.”

The master arbitrator’s award was arbitrary, because it irrationally ignored the controlling law presented on the preservation issue *(Matter of Global Liberty Ins. Co. v Professional Chiropractic Care, P.C.,*139 AD3d 645, 646 [1st Dept 2016]; *see generally Matter of Smith [Firemen’s Ins. Co.],*55 NY2d 224, 232 [1982]) — namely, that an insurer adequately preserves its fee schedule defense “by checking box 18 on the NF-10 denial of claim form to assert that plaintiffs fees [were] not in accordance with the fee schedule” *(Megacure Acupuncture, P.C. v Lancer Ins. Co.,*41 Misc 3d 139[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 51994[U] *3 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *Surgicare Surgical v National Interstate Ins. Co.,*46 Misc 3d 736, 745-746 [Civ Ct, Bronx County 2014], *affd*50 Misc 3d 85 [App Term, 1st Dept 2015]). Accordingly, we remand the matter to the extent indicated.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
#### Jaronczyk, Matter of, v Nassau County Interim Fin. Auth.

2d Dept: 142 AD3d 1020

denied
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Melissa C. England and Another, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Hazard K. Campbell, Sr., and HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as Cotrustees of the Trust by Marjorie Knox Campbell, dated December 29, 1934, Grantor, for the Benefit of Hazard K. Campbell, for the Periods December 29, 1934, to November 5, 1972, and November 5, 1972, to September 24, 2011. Melissa C. England and Another, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Hazard K. Campbell, Sr., et al., Respondents; Gracia E. Campbell et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[51 NYS3d 915]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered May 5, 2015. The order, among other things, granted petitioners’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs and denied respondents’ cross motion to disgorge fees.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying that part of the motion seeking attorneys’ fees and costs, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for a determination of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in accordance with the same memorandum as in *Matter of HSBC Bank USA, N.A.*(Campbell) ([appeal No. 1] 150 AD3d 1661 [2017]).

Present—Centra, J.P., Lindley, Curran and Scudder, JJ.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134306 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134306 COA: 273714 Wayne CC: 99-007414-02 CHARLES MILSTEAD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing ent itlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
# Mask wear makes workplace safer for everyone

/ Published Sept. 18, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Since the beginning of the pandemic, wearing masks or face coverings have been a hot topic of discussion. Regardless of where you stand on the issue, our guidance regarding mask wear while on the Defense Supply Center Columbus is clear.

Department of Defense Guidance on the Use of Cloth Face Coverings directs employees to wear face coverings when on military installations and 6 feet of social distancing cannot be maintained.  This guidance should be followed whether we are inside or outside.

The Occupational Health and Safety Administration stated on their Frequently Asked Questions website in July that face coverings are not a substitute for social distancing measures. This means that social distancing is the most important tool we have to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine put Franklin County under a mandatory mask order July 8 that impacted local businesses. That order was expanded to statewide July 23 to include all 88 Ohio counties.

While DSCC is a federal installation, we generally follow local guidelines where safety is concerned. Wear a face covering when inside any building while you’re at DSCC, the mask should fit snugly covering the nose and mouth, be constructed of two-ply cloth material and not have exhalation vents.

Face coverings are mandatory while outside DSCC, when social distancing of 6 feet spacing cannot be maintained. Exceptions are permitted when eating or drinking, sitting at your desk or work area, or in a room where 6 feet of social distancing is maintained.

I have been asked “Why can’t I take it off when I’m walking down the hallway and no one is around?” If you’re walking around or sitting in a high traffic area, such as a break room, you can’t always guarantee maintaining social distancing because people may be coming around any corner. Your supervisors have implemented work controls to help guarantee social distancing to the maximum extent practicable when you’re sitting in your work area or a conference room.

Why wear a mask or face covering? Dedicated wear has been shown to reduce the spread of the virus, especially from people who are asymptomatic to people who are well. See the illustration below from the World Innovations Forum. Evidence suggests that if both parties are wearing a mask, and one of them an active spreader of COVID-19, the chances of the healthy person contracting the virus is significantly reduced.

Always wear your mask or face covering properly. That means wearing it snugly over your nose and mouth. Your chances of contracting or passing the virus to others goes up dramatically if you don’t wear your mask correctly,

While we are progressing through the Reconstitution, continue to be safe and be smart: Social Distance, Wear a Mask, and Wash Your Hands.
# Supplying America's Military: The DLA Way

/ Published Sept. 1, 2019

                Ron Johns from DLA Europe & Africa’s Regional Synchronization Operations Center ensures customers have necessary supplies for deployments to areas such as Orzysz, Poland, in support of NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence mission.                            190901-D-YE683-001                            Ron Johns from DLA Europe & Africa’s Regional Synchronization Operations Center ensures customers have necessary supplies for deployments to areas such as Orzysz, Poland, in support of NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence mission.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Nutan Chada/Paul CrankVIRIN: 190901-D-YE683-001

Improving warfighter readiness is DLA’s No. 1 priority. National Account Manager teams for the Army, Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force stay in contact with logisticians and planners at the Defense Department-level to help align DLA goals with those of service leaders. DLA customer and warfighter support representatives are also co-located with customers at the tactical level to help solve everyday problems like supply shortages and last-minute requirements. 

The following stories highlight the many ways DLA employees go the extra mile to provide world-class logistics support to America’s men and women in uniform.

**NAM TEAM DIRECTORY**Army NAM Team:571-767-2641 or DSN 392-767-2641

Marine Corps NAM Team:571-767-6198 or DSN 392-767-6198

Navy NAM Team:571-767-1493 or DSN 392-767-1493

Air Force NAM Team:571-767-1222 or DSN 392-767-1222

###### ***For more contact information, visit DLA's Warfighter Support page***
No. 12-7907.

No. 12-8217.

No. 12-8321.

#### Delgado *v.*Illinois. J. C. B. *v.*Pennsylvania State Police. Bouchat *v.*Maryland.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist.;

Super. Ct. Pa.; and

Ct. App. Md. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied. Petitioners are allowed until March 18, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 4.40   | 4.38   | 6.49   | 4.92  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.14   | 7.86   | 10.98  | 5.48   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# San Joaquin’s Unitized Group Rations team provides 65,000 meals in support of COVID-19 

/ Published May 8, 2020
TRACY, Calif., 
Employees at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution San Joaquin, California, have supplied over 65,000 heat-and-serve meals to warfighters and first responders in the coronavirus pandemic.

The Unitized Group Rations team assembles the pre-prepared, shelf-stable meals as tray-pack components in hermetically sealed steam table containers. The group assembles about 21,000 modules totaling over 1 million meals each month.

                Pallets of heat-and-serve Unitized Group Rations are ready for shipment to first responders during the COVID-19 pandemic. (Photo by Annette Silva, DLA Distribution San Joaquin)                            San Joaquin’s Unitized Group Rations team provides 65,000 meals in support of COVID-19                            Pallets of heat-and-serve Unitized Group Rations are ready for shipment to first responders during the COVID-19 pandemic. (Photo by Annette Silva, DLA Distribution San Joaquin)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Annette SilvaVIRIN: 200507-D-LB125-8444

UGRs come in three breakfast and 14 lunch or dinner varieties. Complete with disposable items like cups, trays and trash bags, UGRs contain enough to feed 50 people. Fresh items like bread, milk and fresh produce are provided separately.

Laborer Edward Garcia said he is proud to support service members.

“We as a team have a special mission in providing meals to the warfighter,” Garcia said. “I was a warfighter for nine years in the U.S. Army and take pride in coming to work and doing my part in making sure the warfighters are taken care of.”

The team is adhering to Defense Department guidelines on wearing cloth face coverings, and a third shift has been introduced so employees can maintain 6 feet of distance from one another.

UGR Branch Chief Chris Cingcon commended team members for their unwavering mission support.

“We were impacted by some absences due to the pandemic, and we have continued to be resilient and complete the requirement no matter what obstacles we face,” she said. “Even though there was fear of the unknown, managers, supervisors and employees continued to come together to complete the mission requirements.”