alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 6.66   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14465]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Security for the Protection of the Public Financial 
Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for Death or Injury to 
Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages; Notice of Issuance of 
Certificate (Casualty)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility to Meet Liability Incurred for 
Death or Injury to Passengers or Other Persons on Voyages pursuant to 
the provisions of Section 2, Public Law 89-777 (46 U.S.C. Sec. 817(d)) 
and the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing regulations at 46 
C.F.R. Part 540, as amended:

Cape Canaveral Cruise Line, Inc., International Shipping Partners, Inc. 
and The Kosmas Shipping Group, Inc., 7099 North Atlantic Avenue, Cape 
Canaveral, FL 32920
Vessel: Dolphin IV
Glacier Bay Park Concessions, Inc. (d/b/a Glacier Bay Tours and 
Cruises), Glacier Bay Marine Services, Inc., Goldbelt Enterprises, Inc. 
and Goldbelt, Inc., 520 Pike Street, Suite 1400, Seattle, WA 98101
Vessel: Wilderness Discoverer
Manhattan Cruises, LLC, Star Cruise Management Limited, and SuperStar 
Capricorn Limited, 444 Madison Avenue, Suite 401, New York, NY 10022
Vessel: Superstar Capricorn
New Commodore Cruise Lines Limited, Sea-Comm, Ltd. and Azure 
Investments, Inc., 4000 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 385 South, Hollywood, FL 
33021
Vessel: Universe Explorer
Princess Cruises, Inc., Princess Cruise Lines, Inc., The Peninsular and 
Oriental Steam Navigation Company and Fairline Shipping International 
Corporation, 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 1800, Los Angeles, CA 
90067
Vessel: Grand Princess
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., Airtours plc and Tranquility Leasing 
Ltd., 1050 Caribbean Way, Miami, FL 33132-2096
Vessel: Song of America
Society Expeditions, Inc., Society Expeditions GmbH, Discoverer 
Reederei GmbH and World Discoverer Shipping Corp., 2001 Western Avenue, 
Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98121
Vessel: World Discoverer
Special Expeditions, Inc., Wilderness Cruises, Inc. and SPEX Sea Bird 
Ltd., 720 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10019
Vessel: Sea Bird
Special Expeditions, Inc. Wilderness Cruises, Inc. and SPEX Sea Lion 
Ltd., 720 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10019
Vessel: Sea Lion
Thomson Holidays Limited and Topaz International Shipping, Inc., 
Greater London House, Hampstead Road, London NW1 7SD, England
Vessel: The Topaz
Windjammer Barefoot Cruises, Ltd., International Maritime Resources, 
Inc., and Windjammer Inc. 1759 Bay Road Miami, FL 33139-1413
Vessel: Legacy
    Dated: May 27, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14465 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration

[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 98-17; Exemption Application No. D-
10412]


Grant of Individual Exemption for the Metropolitan Life Insurance 
Company (MetLife)

AGENCY: Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, Department of 
Labor.

ACTION: Notice of technical correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On April 22, 1998, the Department published in the Federal Register 
at 63 FR 19955, a notice granting an individual exemption (the Grant 
Notice) which would permit, effective April 1, 1997, (1) the purchase 
or retention by an employee benefit plan (the Plan); and (2) the sale 
or continuation by MetLife or an affiliate, of a synthetic guaranteed 
investment contract entered into between the Plan and MetLife under 
which MetLife guarantees certain amounts.
    With respect to the information contained in the Grant Notice, the 
Department notes that there are several typographical errors in the 
paragraph captioned EFFECTIVE DATE: which appears in the second column 
of the Grant Notice on page 19956. As currently drafted, the paragraph 
states that ``If granted, this exemption is effective as of April 1, 
1996.'' Because the operative language of the Grant Notice states that 
the effective date of the exemption is April 1, 1997, the Department 
believes the captioned paragraph should be revised accordingly as 
follows:

EFFECTIVE DATE: This exemption is effective as of April 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jan D. Broady of the Department, 
telephone (202) 219-8881. (This is not a toll-free number.)

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 18th of May, 1998.
Ivan L. Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations, Pension and Welfare Benefits 
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 98-13745 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906
    OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  Date: May 7, 2009
  /s/  BRIAN
    T. MOYNIHAN
  Brian T. Moynihan
 Chief Executive Officer
Kruger, Brett (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Dan Thomas <dthomas@japanvp.com> 

Monday, August 20, 2012 11:08 AM 

Rosenberg, Esta (OST); Kruger, Brett (OST) . 

Docket DOT -OST-2010-0018 DL Request to Shift Service Ha~ci1 te!Vkel fr.o(),:bTW to 

SEA 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Kruger, 

I am writing in response to the recent notification issued by the DOT regarding the Motion of Delta Airlines in 

in the matter of 2010 U.S.-Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding. 

By way of background, I am a frequent traveler between the United States and Japan having flown over 2 

million actual miles on Delta and its predecessor NW A and over 1 million miles on United Airlines. I currently 

reside in Seattle. I am not in any way affiliated with any of the carriers. I would like to make the following 

points with respect to this proceeding. 

1) Ultimately the goal of this proceeding is to benefit the public and therefore I believe it is important that the 

DOT give adequate consideration to the opinions of the actual flying public. Heretofore, I believe 

communication to and opinions received by the DOT have been predominantly from the carriers. 

2) Air traffic between Japan and the U.S. has been dominated by a small number of carriers, which has resulted 

in disproportionately higher fares than on other routes. This has been exacerbated by the mergers of DLI NWA 

and UA/CO. Allowing additional carriers to operate between Japan and the U.S. would help to ameliorate this 

problem and should be considered by the DOT. 

3) DL has already been given the opportunity to operate additional flights between the U.S. and Japan and has 

failed to do so on a consistent basis. 

4) Since its merger with NW A, DL has de-emphasized the importance of its Japanese operations and its 

commitment to Japan bound passengers. A cursory review of various social media sites will show that there is 

extreme dissatisfaction with DL among frequent international flyers. 

5) The Japan-Seattle market is adequately served. NH has recently added an additional flight between NRT and 

SEA. 

6) It should be obvious that DL's intention if they get this route is either a) to cancel its existing to NRT -SEA 

route or it's NRT -PDX route. If DL is awarded this route, it should only be with a pre-condition that they not 

suspend or cancel any existing routes between Japan and SEA or PDX for a period of 5 years. 

7) In making it's decision, the DOT should give primary emphasis to a) increasing on competition on routes 

already served where there is limited competition (e.g. BOS, DTW, MSP), b) providing service to cities not 

currently served, or c) allowing carriers not currently serving the Japan market to do so. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Dan Thomas 

1
No. 12-8313.

#### Leuchtmann *v.*Russell, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                                                   
|No chart available.                                                                                   
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Corpus Christi,TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Pakistan (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2019                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     | W   |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | W   | W   |     |     |    
|2021                                                                                                                              | W   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### In the Matter of County of Nassau, Appellant, v Civil Service Employees Association, Respondent.

[52 NYS3d 880]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award dated September 4, 2014, in which the Civil Service Employees Association cross-petitioned to confirm the award, the County of Nassau appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Iannacci, J.), entered March 23, 2015, which, in effect, denied the petition and granted the cross petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited (see *Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc.,*6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006]; *A&L Vil. Mkt., Inc. v 344 Vil., Inc.,*140 AD3d 804, 805 [2016]; *Matter of Vintage Flooring & Tile, Inc. v DCM of NY, LLC,*123 AD3d 731, 732 [2014]). An arbitration award may be vacated if it violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation of the arbitrator’s power *(see Matter of Falzone [New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.],*15 NY3d 530, 534 [2010]; *Matter of Board of Educ. of Arlington Cent. School Dist. v Arlington Teachers Assn.,*78 NY2d 33, 37 [1991]; *Matter of Pinkesz v Wertzberger,*139 AD3d 1071, 1072 [2016]; *Matter of Slocum v Madariaga,*123 AD3d 1046 [2014]; *Matter of Braver v Silberman,*90 AD3d 654, 656 [2011]). In addition, pursuant to CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (i), an arbitration award may be vacated if the court finds that the rights of a party were prejudiced by “corruption, fraud or misconduct in procuring the award.” The petitioner must prove by clear and convincing evidence that vacatur is appropriate under one or more of these grounds *(see Matter of Kirchhoff-Consigli Constr. Mgt., LLC v Mechtronics Corp.,*144 AD3d 682, 683 [2016]; *Matter of Quality Bldg. Constr., LLC v Jagiello Constr. Corp.,*125 AD3d 973, 973-974 [2015]).

Here, the County of Nassau failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the arbitration award should be vacated on the ground that it was irrational *(see Matter of Fagan v Village of Harriman,*140 AD3d 868, 868 [2016]; *Matter of Reddy v Schaffer,*123 AD3d 935, 937 [2014] ). Additionally, the County failed to establish that the arbitrator engaged in misconduct (see *Dedvukaj v Parlato,*136 AD3d 733, 734 [2016]; *Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v GEICO [Govt. Empls. Ins. Co.],*100 AD3d 878, 879 [2012]) or that the award violated public policy (see *Matter of County of Nassau v Sheriff's Officers Assn.,*294 AD2d 31 [2002]). Accordingly, the Supreme *1231Court properly, in effect, denied the petition to vacate the arbitration award, and granted the cross petition to confirm the arbitration award.

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Balkin and Barros, JJ., concur.
San Joaquin’s Urrea named one of DLA’s Top Ten Personnel
 
  By  Annette Silva, DLA Distribution San Joaquin Public Affairs
  Guillermo Urrea, distribution process worker at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution San Joaquin, California, Consolidation & Containerization Point, was recognized as one of DLA’s Top Ten Personnel at the 52nd Annual Employee Recognition Program ceremony Dec. 6 held at the Andrew T. McNamara Complex, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. “Mr. Urrea was our top processor out of 19 processors in CCP’s small parcel operation and his efforts were key to the distribution center’s highly demanding and complex missions,” said Specialized Mission Division Chief Darren McFall. Urrea is a key player in the CCP operation. His stellar processing allowed the CCP to expertly process more than 600,000 lines of materiel over the year, on more than 5,000 seavans and nearly 1,400 air pallets in support of more than 4,000 Department of Defense Account Activity Codes, 12 Break Bulk Points, and four Theater Consolidation and Shipping Points located throughout the United States Indo-Pacific Command theater of operations. He helped the CCP to efficiently manage air, sea and land routes ultimately increasing cargo movement, cube utilization and production performance in the effort to bring the best value to the warfighters. Safety is always in the forefront. Urrea contributed to the newly installed and ergonomically designed workstations. He helped to test the stations to ensure they would reduce the need for employees to twist, turn, bend or stoop while handling materiel. He is a seasoned processor and one that is continually relied on during external audits to help showcase CCP’s processes and demonstrates the strong commitment to audit readiness. During the 2018 Ernst & Young audit, he performed his checks to perfection and was highlighted as a top performer by the team. CCP leadership created a workload production matrix to accurately capture employees’ processing and production times, lines per hour totals, and both efficiency and effectiveness ratings to recognize exceptional employees. Urrea outperformed all processors and was the first of 14 deserving employees to receive this incentive. He personally processed 19,893 lines against the requirement of 15.588, achieving a remarkable efficiency rating of 129%, 39% above average. Further, Urrea is a team player. With his extensive subject matter expertise and the ability to work will with others, he fostered relationships with all CCP supervisors and employees and was regularly relied upon to help resolve issues with challenging materiel. Additionally, he helped new supervisors and employees learn the technical part of the job resulting in proper accountability and identification of all materiel received. “Mr. Urrea is a remarkable and multi-faceted employee and truly epitomized the qualities and values behind the premise of this prestigious award. He is the finest example of DLA’s workforce,” concluded McFall.
#### Com. v. Wunder

10/14/2015

365 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 435
#### Atlas New York Limited Liability Company, Doing Business as Atlas Real Estate New York, Respondent, v Michael Eisenberg et al., Appellants.

[52 NYS3d 630]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered September 27, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the cause of action for breach of contract pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (3) and (7), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, which lacked a real estate brokerage license in its own name, had the capacity to commence this action to recover for unpaid brokerage services pursuant to brokerage agreements “made for its benefit in its assumed name” *(see Mail & Express Co., Inc. v Parker Axles,*Inc., 204 App Div 327, 329 [1st Dept 1923]; Real Property Law § 442-d). The record supports the motion court’s finding that plaintiff, whose principal was a licensed real estate broker, properly applied for a real estate license to conduct its real estate brokerage business under the assumed name, which it also properly registered with the New York State Department of State. We take judicial notice that the Department of State authorizes a real estate brokerage limited liability company to do business under an assumed name, as can be seen on the Real Estate Broker Application form available from the Division of Licensing Services *(see*https://www.dos.ny.gov/forms/licensing/0036-a-f.pdf at 11).

The compensation terms in the brokerage agreements, which include stated commission percentages in relation to rental amounts agreed to, are sufficiently definite to convey “what was promised” *(see Kenneth D. Laub & Co. v Bear Stearns Cos.,*262 AD2d 36, 36 [1st Dept 1999] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *Abrams Realty Corp. v Elo,*279 AD2d 261 [1st Dept 2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 715 [2001]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Richter, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-18-0000552

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

 LANCE KAMUELA GOMES, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

LIHU#E DIVISION

(5DCW-18-0000309)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Chan and Hiraoka, JJ.)

Upon review of the record in CAAP-18-0000552, it

appears this court lacks appellate jurisdiction. DefendantAppellant Lance Kamuela Gomes filed a Notice of Appeal on

July 13, 2018, from 5DCW-18-0000309. "[I]n order to appeal a

criminal matter in the district court, the appealing party must

appeal from a written judgment or order that has been filed with

the clerk of the court pursuant to [Hawai#i Rules of Appellate

Procedure] Rule 4(b)(3)." State v. Bohannon, 102 Hawai#i 228,

236, 74 P.3d 980, 988 (2003) (emphasis omitted). The record on

appeal does not contain an appealable final judgment or order. 

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000552

07-AUG-2020

08:57 AM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Therefore, the appeal is premature and this court lacks appellate

jurisdiction over the appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 7, 2020.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

2
#### Brian J. Boreanaz et al., Appellants, v Susan Facer-kreidler et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[769 NYS2d 762]

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Lane, J.), entered October 24, 2002, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew with respect to defendants’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Boreanaz v Facer-Kreidler*(2 AD3d 1481 [2003]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner and Kehoe, JJ.
No. 12-7256.

#### Morse *v.*Crews, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.