alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to India (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to India (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb   | Mar | Apr  | May  | Jun | Jul  | Aug  | Sep  | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ----- | --- | ---- | ---- | --- | ---- | ---- | ---- | --- | --- | ---
|2023                                                                                                                              |     | 16.19 |     |      |      |     | 8.09 | 7.14 | 7.31 |     |     |    
|2024                                                                                                                              |     |       |     | 6.62 | 7.34 |     |      |      |      |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Peg Bandwidth, LLC, Appellant, v Optical Communications, Respondent.

[56 NYS3d 66]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered November 4, 2015, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment or a default judgment, and granted defendant’s motion for an extension of time to answer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*626While plaintiff satisfied the requirements of CPLR 3215 (f) for a default judgment, we decline to disturb the motion court’s exercise of its broad discretion in finding that defendant’s excuse for its delay in answering the complaint, i.e., law office failure, was reasonable *(see e.g. Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v Braun,*120 AD3d 1128 [1st Dept 2014]). In addition, the delay was relatively short, plaintiff failed to demonstrate prejudice, and there is a strong preference that matters be decided on the merits *(see Gantt v North Shore-LIJ Health Sys.,*140 AD3d 418 [1st Dept 2016]).

On its motion for summary judgment, plaintiff failed to tender sufficient evidence to eliminate material issues of fact *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Issues of fact as to whether plaintiff properly terminated the agreement pursuant to its terms arise from the face of the agreement and the affidavit by plaintiff’s vice chairman. Moreover, there are issues of fact as to which party breached the agreement, and there has been no discovery yet *(see*CPLR 3212 [f]).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
exv4w3



 








Exhibit 4.3




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the Registration Statement
(Form F-8) (File No. 333-129218), as amended on
December 15, 2005, January 20, 2006, February 28,
2006 and May 31, 2006 (the “Amended Registration
Statement”), pertaining to Inco Limited’s offer dated
October 24, 2005 to
purchase all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Falconbridge Limited (formerly Noranda
Inc.) (the “Company”) and the incorporation by reference in the Amended Registration Statement of our
auditors’ report dated  February 7, 2006 (except as to
Note 23 which is as of March 16, 2006) relating to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company
as at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated statements of income and retained
earnings (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
	Toronto, Canada,
	 	 
	May 29, 2006

	 	Chartered Accountants
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Malta (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Malta (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | W      | 8.87   | 8.23   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
JAMES CLAYTON ADAMS III,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1114

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 12, 2017. 

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jan Shackelford, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2003, of ANR Pipeline Company (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Greg G.
Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify
(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                          /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Greg G. Gruber
                                          Senior Vice President,
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)

                                          May 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ANR Pipeline Company and will be retained by ANR Pipeline Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 193 (Thursday, October 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 60741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24504]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8052]

Convening of an Accountability Review Board To Examine the 
Circumstances Surrounding the Deaths of Personnel Assigned in Support 
of the U.S. Government Mission to Libya in Benghazi, Libya on September 
11, 2012

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 301 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and 
Antiterrorism Act of 1986, as amended (22 U.S.C. 4831 et seq.), 
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has determined that the 
recent deaths of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, Information 
Management Officer Sean Smith, and security personnel Glen Doherty and 
Tyrone Woods in Benghazi, Libya involved loss of life at or related to 
a U.S. mission abroad. Therefore, Secretary Clinton has convened an 
Accountability Review Board, as required by that statute, to examine 
the facts and circumstances of the attacks and to report findings and 
recommendations as it deems appropriate, in keeping with its mandate. 
The Secretary has appointed Thomas Pickering, a retired U.S. 
ambassador, as Chair of the Board. He will be assisted by Admiral 
Michael G. Mullen, Ms. Catherine Bertini, Mr. Richard J. Shinnick, and 
Mr. Hugh J. Turner III. They bring to their deliberations distinguished 
backgrounds in government service. If you are contacted for an 
interview by the Board, please give them your full and prompt 
cooperation.
    The Board will submit its conclusions and recommendations to 
Secretary Clinton within 60 days of its first meeting, unless the Chair 
determines a need for additional time. Within the timeframe required by 
statute following receipt of the report, the Department will report to 
Congress on all recommendations made by the Board and any actions 
undertaken in response to those recommendations.
    Anyone with information relevant to the Board's examination of 
these incidents should contact the Board promptly at (202) 647-6246 or 
send a fax to the Board at (202) 647-6640.

    Dated: October 1, 2012.
Patrick F. Kennedy,
Under Secretary of State for Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-24504 Filed 10-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-35-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-K/A of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 (the Report), I, Kendra A. Borrego, Chief Financial Officer of IMPAC Medical
Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |     |  |                        
|---------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|October 29, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ KENDRA A. BORREGO  
|                 |  |     |  | Kendra A. Borrego      
|                 |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### People v Figueroa

4th Dept: 141 AD3d 1112

denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                            1,830
<SECURITIES>                     22,009
<RECEIVABLES>                   158,637
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                      85,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                278,427
<PP&E>                          376,139
<DEPRECIATION>                  188,906
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  553,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           201,076
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                         56,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                      169,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    553,382
<SALES>                         318,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                318,404
<CGS>                           127,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   127,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                121,349
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                5,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  65,416
<INCOME-TAX>                     15,373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              50,043
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     50,043
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                      1.12
        

</TABLE>
Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Rule 116

116

- 1 RULE 116 EMISSIONS STATEMENT AND CERTIFICATION

(Adopted 02/23/2010 )

A. Upon the request of the Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO) and as directed by the APCO, the owner or operator of any source operation which emits or may emit oxides of nitrogen or reactive organic gas shall provide the APCO with a
written statement, in s uch form as the APCO prescribes, showing actual emissions of oxides of nitrogen and reactive organic gas from that source. At a

minimum the emission statement shall contain as described in the ARB's Emission Inventory Guidelines http://www.arb.ca.gov/ei/drei/create/guidance.htm

. The statement shall contain emissions for the time period specified by the APCO. The statement shall also contain a certification by a responsible official of the

comp any that the information contained in the statement is accurate to the best knowledge of the individual certifying the statement. The first statement will cover 2009 emissions and shall be submitted to the district by December 2010.

Statements shall be sub mitted annually thereafter.

B. T he APCO may waive this requirement to any class or category of stationary sources which emit less than 25 tons per year of oxides of nitrogen or reactive organic gas if the district provides the Air Resources Board with an emission inventory of sources emitting greater than 10 tons per year of nitrogen oxides or reactive organic gas based on the use of emission factors acceptable to the Air

Resources Board.

C. All official documents submitted to the Air Pollution Control Distr ict (APCD) shall contain a certification signed and dated by a responsible official of the company.

This certification must attest that the information contained in the submitted documents is accurate to the best knowledge of the individual certifying the submission. The requirements of this Section apply to, but are not limited to, the emissions statements required in Section A of this rule.
No. 11-10983.

#### Hill *v.*Walsh, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### JOHN D. FLINT v. JOHN B. ELLISON & SONS.1

November 6, 1908.

Nos. 15,882—(75).

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $301.41. The case was tried before Waite, J., who directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $278.60. Ftom an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a fiew trial, defendant appealed.

Affirmed.

*•Benton, Molyneaug; & Morley,*for appellant.

*;George B. EecmwrJ,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 118 N. W. 1118.

*537PER CURIAM.

Action to recover commission upon the amount of goods sold by respondent. By agreement respondent was to receive $000 per annum, or about seven per cent, upon the amount of goods sold up to $13,000, and three per cent, upon any excess of such amount, and the real point ip controversy is whether, in arriving at the amount of the commission which should be paid on goods delivered in the spring of 1907, but on orders taken in 1906, the spring deliveries should be considered as a part of the excess of $13,000, or as a new maximum for 1907. The trial court was of opinion that the commissions were based upon the actual delivery of goods each year, and that orders delivered after the close of the fiscal year made up the first part of a new maximum sum of $13,000, and that seven per cent, should be allowed on the amount delivered in the spring of 1907. We have considered the pleadings and stipulation, and carefully read the record, and, while the question is involved in considerable confusion, we are of opinion that the evidence sustains the 'conclusions of the trial court.

Affirmed.
#### Rafaela Fontecchio, Respondent, v Bronx 656 Food Corp. et al., Appellants, and John Catsimatidis et al., Respondents.

[56 NYS3d 86]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered on or about July 28, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants Bronx 656 Food Corp. and Fine Fare Supermarket’s (together, Fine Fare) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The lease between Fine Fare and the owner of the shopping center does not explicitly state that Fine Fare was responsible for maintaining the parking lot in which plaintiff alleges she was injured after stepping into a hole. However, it does make Fine Fare responsible for “appurtenances” to the demised premises (see *Second on Second Café, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc.,*66 AD3d 255, 267 [1st Dept 2009]). On this record, an issue of fact exists as to whether the parking lot was an “appurtenance.”

Concur—Renwick, J.R, Richter, Feinman, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Brazil (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Brazil (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8.66   | 7.80   | 10.34  | 5.84   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2016-1735.

#### State v. Simes.

Cuyahoga App. No. 103672, 2016-Ohio-7300.

French, J., dissents.