alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32(a)**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of ALLTELCorporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, Scott T. Ford, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Scott T. Ford                     |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Scott T. Ford                         |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| August 6, 2004                   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to ALLTEL Corporation and will be retainedby ALLTEL Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            268,008
<SECURITIES>                                       12,135
<RECEIVABLES>                                     145,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                       30,000
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  532,654
<PP&E>                                         12,678,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,662,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  3,002,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             987,222
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           25,039
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,082,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    3,002,367
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,065,552
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,168,787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (102,081)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (102,081)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (102,081)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        


</TABLE>
No. 12-570.

#### Regents of the University of California et al. *v.*Caldera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
2017-0177.

#### Lucas v. Marshall.

In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J.¡ and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Michael Craig Martin II, an Attorney.

[52 NYS3d 240]

*1536Per Curiam.

Michael Craig Martin II was admitted to practice by this Court in 2011 and lists a business address in Seattle, Washington with the Office of Court Administration. Martin now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons *(see*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department advises that it does not oppose Martin’s application.

Upon reading the affidavit of Martin sworn to January 16, 2017, and upon reading the correspondence in response by the Chief Attorney for the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined that Martin is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant his application and accept his resignation.

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Garry, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that Michael Craig Martin IPs application for permission to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further ordered that Michael Craig Martin II’s name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court *(see generally*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]); and it is further ordered that, effective immediately, Michael Craig Martin II is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Martin is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further ordered that Michael Craig Martin II shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Millipore Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended July 4, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, Martin D. Madaus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Charles F. Wagner, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/    MARTIN D. MADAUS*                  
|Martin D. Madaus                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer     
|                                          
|August 12, 2009                           
|                                          
|/s/    CHARLES F. WAGNER, JR.*            
|Charles F. Wagner, Jr.                    
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                          
|August 12, 2009                           



|* | - A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Millipore Corporation and will be retained by Millipore Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

             STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Santo P. Pasqualucci, is the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Falmouth Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by
the Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

      B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the
Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the
Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It
is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date:  April 5, 2004                      /s/ Santo P. Pasqualucci
                                          ------------------------
                                          Santo P. Pasqualucci

<PAGE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bonta Smith, Appellant.

[53 NYS3d 528]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J. at suppression hearing; Daniel P. Fitzgerald, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered February 20, 2015, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

*459Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Richter, Feinman, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
# DLA, DoD IT professionals share business system practices, efficiencies 

/ Published June 14, 2019
Chantilly, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency senior leaders hosted colleagues from the services and various Department of Defense agencies at the Cross Service Program Executive Officer Summit in Chantilly, Virginia, in May.

The summit assembles PEOs who work with defense business systems and information-technology related capabilities to share experiences and seek efficiencies as DoD continues to refine its business systems.Representatives were from the Air Force PEO Business and Enterprise Systems; Air Force PEO Command, Control, Communications, Intelligence and Networks; Navy PEO Enterprise Information Systems; Army PEO Enterprise Information Systems; U.S. Transportation Command PEO and Defense Information Systems Agency PEO.DLA Acting Program Executive Officer Ken Fielding opened the discussion by welcoming attendees and reiterating the importance of sharing current efforts. He reminded everyone that the intent was for actionable discussion and dialogue to assist in making DoD’s business system enterprise more efficient.

“Engaging with our colleagues from the services and agencies in a collaborative environment allows us to better support the warfighter,” Fielding said. “While our day-to-day focus is to support our respective service and agency missions, dedicating time to share capabilities and discuss solutions to common challenges is a big win for the department.”

Conversation and presentations focused on streamlining user experience of DoD business systems. Topics included robotics process automation; the Microsoft Office 365 Flow 3 pilot; moving enterprise resource planning systems to cloud environments; and efforts to align functional and acquisition communities with tools such as capability roadmaps. DLA also demonstrated the DLA Service Readiness Dashboard to show ways other organizations could benefit from a similar capability.
No. 12-8285.

#### Craig *v.*Craig.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Table 1: Carbon sequestered by LULUCF sinks as reported in the Inventory (Tg CO2 Eq.)1

, ranked in order of magnitude.

Forest Land Remaining Forest Land has been further broken up into forest and harvested wood carbon pools.

IPCC Source Category LULUCF Sink 2008

*1990–2008

Average

Forest Land Remaining Forest Land

(Carbon Stock Changes)

Total Forest Sector C Stock Change (791.9) (688.0)

Forest (703.9) (576.7)

Aboveground Biomass (397.2) (373.5)

Soil Organic Carbon (145.9) (68.0)

Belowground Biomass (78.8) (74.1)

Litter (55.9) (35.8)

Dead Wood   (26.2) (25.3)

Harvested Wood (88.0) (111.2)

SWDS (63.6) (63.7)

Products in Use (24.4) (47.6)

Settlements Remaining Settlements C Stock Changes in Urban Trees (93.9) (75.5)

Cropland Remaining Cropland Soil C Stock Changes for Mineral Soils (45.7) (51.5)

Land Converted to Grassland   Soil C Stock Changes for Mineral Soils (25.1) (24.0)

Grassland Remaining Grassland Soil C Stock Changes in Mineral Soils (12.4) (23.3)

Other   Changes in Yard Trimming and Food Scrap C

Stocks in Landfills (9.5) (13.6)

Gross Sequestration from LULUCF Sinks (978.5) (875.9)

* The U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventories submitted to the UNFCCC provide annual estimates from 1990.

Table 2: Emissions from LULUCF sources as reported in the Inventory (Tg CO2 Eq.), ranked in order of magnitude.

IPCC Source Category LULUCF Source 2008 *1990–2008

Average

Cropland Remaining Cropland Soil C Stock Changes in Organic Soils 27.7 27.6

Forest Land Remaining Forest Land Non‐CO2 Emissions from Forest Fires 21.7 15.7

Land Converted to Cropland Soil C Stock Changes for Mineral and Organic

Soils 5.9 2.8

Cropland Remaining Cropland Liming of Agricultural Soils 3.8 4.4

Cropland Remaining Cropland Urea Fertilization 3.8 3.1

Grassland Remaining Grassland Soil C Stock Changes in Organic Soils 3.7 3.7

Settlements Remaining Settlements Direct N2O Fluxes from Settlement Soils 1.6 1.2

Wetlands Remaining Wetlands CO2 and N2O Emissions from Peatlands

Remaining Peatlands 0.9 1.0

Land Converted to Grassland Soil C Stock Changes in Organic Soils 0.9 0.8

Forest Land Remaining Forest Land Direct N2O Emissions from Forest Soils 0.4 0.3

Gross Emissions from LULUCF Sources 70.4 60.6

* The U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventories submitted to the UNFCCC provide annual estimates from 1990.

 1 The Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 –2008 (April 2010) and the archive of previous inventories

are available online from the Environmental Protection Agency Inventory Report Web site, located at

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/usinventoryreport.html.
No. 12-8610.

#### Gregory *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# DLA leaders highlight research, development efforts at Defense Manufacturing Conference

/ Published Dec. 6, 2019
Phoenix, Arizona, 
Leaders from government, industry and academia met in Arizona this week for the four-day Defense Manufacturing Conference, based on the theme “Defense Manufacturing Focused on Warfighter Dominance.”

The event opened in Phoenix on Monday with a highlight of manufacturing technology innovation efforts that support the defense industrial base.

DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams spoke Tuesday about the agency’s research and development efforts and how they support the national defense strategy. From improvements in battery technology used by troops in the field to the DLA Service Readiness Dashboard, which tracks how well the agency is supporting key weapons systems, Williams was enthusiastic.

“If there’s one concept to take away today, it’s that DLA and DLA R&D are all about improving the lives and capabilities of our warfighters,” he said.

David Koch, DLA’s research and development chief said the event allowed attendees to share ideas, learn about new technologies and focus on important topics impacting the Defense Department’s manufacturing capability.

“The conference provides DLA an opportunity to showcase many of our R&D projects while also facilitating collaboration with industry, academia and the military services on their focus areas and new capabilities,” he added.

Several DLA leaders participated in panel discussions on innovation, manufacturing technology and other topics.

Air Force Maj. Gen. Allan Day, DLA’s executive director of operations, moderated a panel on innovative technologies and manufacturing outlook. George Duchak, DLA’s chief information officer, joined the general in discussing how emerging capabilities must be capitalized on to improve the industrial base.

In a second panel, DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. David Sanford focused on security implications in supply-chain processes. He was joined by Adarryl Roberts, DLA’s program executive officer, and Air Force Col. Scott Ritzel, DLA’s chief risk officer.

In closing comments, Williams said, “As we’re about to enter the third decade of the 21st century, we can look back and see what a long way we’ve come. Years ago, we could only dream of the amazing technologies and innovations we have today, but I would caution against resting on our laurels.”

The director highlighted the DLA Strategic Plan and its “Leading Change” supplement.

“We believe you can either let change happen to you,” he said, “or you can lead change.”
#### Fedie R. Redd, Appellant, v Village of Freeport, Respondent.

[53 NYS3d 692]

Appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roy S. Mahon, J.), entered March 10, 2015, and June 25, 2015, respectively. The order entered March 10, 2015, *781granted the defendant’s motion for leave to amend its answer to add the affirmative defense of collateral estoppel. The order entered June 25, 2015, granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint as barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Under CPLR 3025 (b), a party may amend a pleading “at any time” by leave of the court (CPLR 3025 [b]), even after trial *(see Kimso Apts., LLC v Gandhi,*24 NY3d 403, 411 [2014]). Leave to amend “shall be freely given upon such terms as may be just including the granting of costs and continuances” (CPLR 3025 [b]). Generally, courts should grant leave to amend when (1) there has been no “prejudice or surprise resulting directly from the delay in seeking leave,” and (2) the proposed amendment is neither palpably insufficient nor patently devoid of merit *(Lucido v Mancuso,*49 AD3d 220, 222 [2008]; *see Katz v Castlepoint Ins. Co.,*121 AD3d 948, 950 [2014]). The party opposing the application has the burden of establishing prejudice *(see Kimso Apts., LLC v Gandhi,*24 NY3d at 411), which requires a showing that the party “has been hindered in the preparation of [its] case or has been prevented from taking some measure in support of [its] position” *(Loomis v Civetta Corinno Constr. Corp.,*54 NY2d 18, 23 [1981]; *see Kimso Apts., LLC v Gandhi,*24 NY3d at 411). Here, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant leave to amend its answer to assert the affirmative defense of collateral estoppel. The plaintiff did not demonstrate that she was prejudiced or unfairly surprised by the delay. Moreover, the proposed amendment was neither palpably insufficient nor patently devoid of merit *(see Lucido v Mancuso,*49 AD3d at 222).

After granting the defendant leave to amend its answer, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by collateral estoppel *(see Matter of Guimarales [New York City Bd. of Educ.—Roberts],*68 NY2d 989, 991 [1986]; *Abrahams v Commonwealth Land Tit. Ins. Co.,*120 AD3d 1165, 1166 [2014]; *Matter of Samuels [New York City Tr. Auth.—Commissioner of Labor],*118 AD3d 1206, 1207 [2014]; *Nachum v Ezagui,*83 AD3d 1017, 1018 [2011]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contention is not properly before this Court.

Balkin, J.R, Austin, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
# Army recruits receive American-made athletic footwear at basic training for first time

/ Published Oct. 4, 2019
PHILADEPHIA, 
A new fiscal year marked the initial issue of American-made athletic footwear to new Army recruits at Ft. Benning, Georgia Oct. 1, thanks to Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support.

Approximately 134 recruits received the shoes, along with other uniform items part of the organizational clothing and individual equipment kit. Recruits at Ft. Leonard Wood, Missouri also received athletic footwear this week, with recruits at Ft. Jackson, South Carolina and Ft. Sill, Oklahoma to receive the new shoes starting Oct. 7.

During the issuance process recruits are fitted for size, and provided items are scanned with radio-frequency identification technology. This system allows DLA Troop Support’s Clothing and Textiles supply chain to receive accurate inventory information directly from the recruit center’s issue line, customer relationship management supervisor Monique Williams explained.

“The inventory is decremented and a demand signal is created for our planning teams, which prompts the auto-stock transport order to automatically replenish inventory at the recruit training center,” Williams said.  

C&T will outfit nearly 19,000 new soldiers at all four RTCs with athletic footwear by the end of the year.

DLA has been working with its industry and service partners for years gearing up for the roll-out, and overall athletic footwear program. Air Force recruits at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas were the first to receive athletic footwear in January.