alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10M31.

#### Donald G. Jackman, Jr., Petitioner v. Department of Justice, et al.

562 U.S. 819, 131 S. Ct. 377,

178 L. Ed. 2d 13,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6321.

October 4, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Mays, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 267]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa Jackson, J.), rendered November 20, 2014, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States
Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Qwest
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: October 28, 2009

By:

/s/ EDWARD A. MUELLER Edward A. Mueller Chief Executive OfficerDated: October 28, 2009

By:

/s/ JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER Joseph J. Euteneuer Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FORM 10-QSB FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             227
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        874
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,179
<PP&E>                                           3,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,024
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           369
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,058
<SALES>                                          2,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,293
<CGS>                                            1,617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (2)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     36
<INCOME-TAX>                                        11
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 25
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        25
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      18,472,719
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     231,840,783
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,461,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 46,143,134
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      62,767,464
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        63,074,004
<LOANS>                                    191,345,824
<ALLOWANCE>                                (2,114,684)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             344,045,616
<DEPOSITS>                                 306,291,600
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,691,788
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,636,514
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,425,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             344,045,616
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             18,801,501
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,517,031
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               657,987
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            24,976,519
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,424,859
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,424,859
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       16,551,660
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   30,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             13,204,904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,820,967
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   6,820,967
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,204,967
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.95
<LOANS-NON>                                    790,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    31,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               737,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,702,076
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                (723,692)
<RECOVERIES>                                   106,300
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,114,634
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,239,520
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION





I, Richard C. Adkerson, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2003





/s/ Richard C. Adkerson

Richard C. Adkerson

Co-Chairman of the Board, President

and Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARMANDO HERNANDEZ VILLALBA, AKA Amando Hernandez,

Petitioner,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 15

- 73711 Agency No. A205

- 714

- 205

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 1 7 , 2022 * *
Before: CANBY , TASHIMA, and NGUYEN , Circuit Judges. Armando Hernandez Villalba, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judges’ decision denying his application for withholding of
removal and relief und er the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) , and denying

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 73711

his request for administrative closure

. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C § 1252.
We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Hernandez
Villalba did not establish nexus between the harm he fears in Mexico and a protected ground. S

ee Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) ( “A n [ applicant’s ] desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or
random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground

. ”)

. Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denia l of CAT relief because Hernandez Villalba failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico.
See Aden v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009)

. We reject as unsupported by the record Hernandez Villalba ’s contentions
that the agency ignored arguments or otherwise erred in analyzing his withholding
of removal and CAT claims. In his opening brief, Hernandez Villalba does not raise , and has therefore
waived , any challenge to the agency’s denial of administrative closure

. See Lopez

Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).
To the extent Hernandez Villalba separately requests remand to seek3 15

- 73711

prosecutorial discretion, the request is den ied

. See Morales de Soto v. Lynch , 824 F.3d 822, 82 8

- 2 9 (9th Cir. 2016) ( declining to remand for petitioner to seek prosecutorial discretion).
H ernandez Villalba’s request, raised at Docket Entry No. 32, for remand or termination of proceedings, is denied. See Karingithi v. Whitaker , 913 F.3d 1158,
1160

- 62 (9th Cir. 2019) (rejecting contention that lack of hearing information in notice to appear deprived immigration court of jurisdiction)

. The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the
mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED
.
#### State of Florida, ex rel J. W. Gillespie, et al., *Relators,*vs. Marion F. Mobley, and other officials of Okeechobee County, *Respondents.*

144 So. 839.

En Banc.

Order entered November 21, 1932.

*Vocelle & Mitchell*and *H. A. Lasseter*for Relators;'

*R. E. Hamrick,*fo'r Respondents.

In this case the Court holds that the allegations of the alternative writ are sufficient in law to require the re*281spondents to answer the same. Therefore the motion to' quash the alternative writ will be denied, with leave to answer same within fifteen days.

If issues of fact are found to have been properly raised by such answer, that will require the taking of testimony and proof with respect thereto, respondents will be permitted to assert objections suggested by their motion to quash, which is to the effect that such issues of fact can and should be more conveniently and economically tried in the Circuit Court, and that therefore the proceeding here should be dismissed without prejudice to the right to proceed in the Circuit Court.

Motion to quash alternative writ denied with leave to make further return within fifteen days.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
# When in Doubt, DS it Out

/ Published July 24, 2020
MCCONNELL AIR FORCE BASE, Kan. , 
As outdated office furniture and equipment reaches the end of its life cycle, 22nd Logistics Readiness Squadron flight services center uses the disposition services to maximize supplies that can be repurposed.The disposition services process plays a critical role in allowing the Department of Defense to continuously supply its assets from recycled equipment.“Most people have the interpretation that everything goes to a Defense Logistics Agency site to be scrapped,” said David Rollings, 22nd LRS flight services center lead supervisor. “Some things go up for auction and are reutilized to the max extent possible.”Disposition Services helps Team McConnell reallocate resources by delivering equipment to a DLA site at Fort Riley, Kansas. Rollings said that funds acquired from auctions and scrapings are dispersed back into DoD agencies and their operational budgets.Last year the 22nd LRS flight services center repurposed $2.5 million in assets back into the DoD’s operational budget.The flight services center is available Monday through Friday 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. They process equipment every Thursday from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. To schedule an appointment, contact the 22nd LRS flight services center at 759-4896.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the McConnell Air Force Base website.*
www.house.gov/green 

# Congressman Gene Green 29th District ofTexas
DC Office: 2470 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 205I 5 (202) 225-1688 tel (202) 225-9903 fax District Offices: 256 N. Sam Houston Pkwy. E. Suite 29 Houston, TX 77060 (28I) 999-5879 tel (281) 999-5716fax I I 8 II 1-10 East Suite 430 Houston, TX 77029 (713) 330-0761 tel (713) 330-0807fax


### Congressman Gene Green's Statementfor the Record EPAPublic Hearing- Refinery SectorRisk August5, 2014

My name is Gene Green and I represent Galena Park and the larger 291h Congressional district in the U.S. House ofRepresentatives.
I wantto startout today by expressing my disappointment. I have represented this area since I was electedto the Texas State Senate in 1985 and I now proudly represent it in the United State Congress. I am concerned because theEnvironmental Protection Agency setthis public hearingbut I received only six days' notice.

The Risk and Technology review ofthe refinery sector and the New Source Performance Standards have significant impacts on my constituents. The industries I represent and our constituents who live near or work in these plants may be adversely impacted by this proposed rule. It is myjob to ensure their voices are heard and rather than contacting our offices and ensuring we are provided ample notice, the EPA paired this hearing with anEnvironmental Justice Training Workshop and failed to provide adequate notification.

Theproposedrule would significantly change the current requirements for refinery emissionsrules by further lowering limits, ending Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) exemptions, and for the first time introducing fenceline monitoring. Many ofourrefineries currentlyinternallymonitorthese fencelines.

The industries in our district have invested billions ofdollars to meet the requirements set forth in Refinery MACT 1 and MACT 2. For almost a decade, the refinery industry has workedto loweremissions with tangible results. Both the Bush and the ObamaAdministrations recognized that the public is adequately protected under the previous rules. The EPA has openly acknowledged that stricter requirements are not necessary, however due to recent consent decrees, the EPA is being forced to act where little or no action may be needed.

The fenceline communities, the refineries, the other key stakeholders are in regular communication to discuss the environmental impacts associated with the operation ofthese facilities. The EPA asserts that monitoring won'treach levels that would necessitate corrective action, so why is the Agency spending taxpayer dollars to engage in anotherrulemaking with littlejustifiableresults.

This package seems duplicative. The Agency recognizes the new rules impose regulations that already exist under previous initiatives. Unfortunately, it would seem all this rule does is limit the operational flexibility these refiners possess and duplicate the amount ofreportingrequirements.

I would request EPA reconsider the imposition ofthis package and refocus their efforts on more effective environmentalrules.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

p0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

138130

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138130 COA: 279545 Wayne CC: 07-006677-01 MICHAEL JAMES MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 4, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# National Preparedness Month reminds everyone of the importance to maintain readiness

/ Published Sept. 16, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
September is National Preparedness Month, a time to highlight the actions we can all take to maintain a level of readiness in our home and personal lives for a wide variety of situations.

In the midst of the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic, the primary mission of the Defense Logistics Agency remains Warfighter Always. As every employee at DLA Distribution strives to place the warfighter first in actions and daily work, the level of readiness and lethality of our nation’s warfighter is maintained at a constant level. The DLA Distribution workforce can only provide that level of support if everyone on the team is prepared and ready to face challenges that may arise wherever they are.

“Our installation has been rigorously following [Centers for Disease Control] CDC guidelines for sanitizing and maintaining safety of our workforce through the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Wayne Rhodes, Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna installation emergency manager.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, all DLA employees should follow the CDC guidelines at the workplace and outside of it. “Masks and hand-washing remain as the best front-line defense to fight the spread,” said Rhodes. Staying home when sick or exposed is also imperative to reduce exposure to others.

Guidance regarding masks dictates that any mask must cover the mouth and the nose; one way breathing valves are not effective as they do not capture water droplets from the breath; and face shields alone are ineffective at stopping the spread of the virus.

DLA Distribution and the Veterans Health Administration are already working together to be stocked and ready for a potential fall outbreak of COVID-19. Just as these government agencies poise themselves in preparation, so too can the workforce be prepared to safe guard the health of themselves, their families and their communities.

In addition to the pandemic, there are other hazards you should prepare for. “Thinking about our hazards and having a plan for them is a key part of any level of preparation,” said Rhodes, highlighting the need to develop a strategy of readiness which reflects the immediate and probable scenarios in any given region.A level of preparation against hurricanes will be different from a plan regarding wildfires. A winter weather plan is good for those in northern climates, but not as applicable to those in Texas.

Locally to DLA Distribution headquarters in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, we should consider severe thunderstorms, major floods, winter storms as well as manmade threats like hazardous materials and criminal activity.

The four basic steps to starting a readiness plan include:1. Put a plan together by discussing the questions below with your family, friends or household to start your emergency plan.2. Consider specific needs in your household.3. Fill out a Family Emergency Plan4. Practice your plan with your family/household

Those interested in more information on preparedness should go to Ready.gov.
Exhibit 15.6




CONSENT




We hereby consent to the reference to our “Valuation of Interest Rate Swap Transaction in Respect of Polish Debentures of Plaza Centers N.V.” as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging Ltd. and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-172122) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd.




This consent is not to be construed as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to be filed under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





/s/ Financial Immunities Ltd.


Financial Immunities Ltd.





Rehovot, Israel


November 26, 2013