alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-559-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

May 22, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 18, 1998, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, filed in 
Docket No. CP98-559-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, 157.211 
and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.211, and 157.216) for authorization to abandon, 
construct, and operate certain facilities in Bannock County, Idaho 
under Northwest's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-433-000 
pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Northwest specifically proposes to (1) abandon its Idaho Falls 
Meter Station by removal, (2) abandon its Idaho Falls Lateral by sale 
to Intermountain Gas Company (Intermountain), (3) construct and operate 
a relocated and upgraded Idaho Falls Meter Station, and (4) maintain 
the existing Idaho Falls Lateral mainline tap for emergency delivery of 
natural gas to Intermountain.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14202 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from consolidated
financial  statements found on the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, June 30, 1997,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            543
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                       76
<INVENTORY>                                    16,806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               26,554
<PP&E>                                         12,341
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 41,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           9,304
<BONDS>                                        13,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          104
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   41,115
<SALES>                                        22,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               22,234
<CGS>                                          16,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (3)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                614
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   191
<INCOME-TAX>                                       76
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               115
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.01
                                          

</TABLE>
Opinion issued March 10, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00545
- CV

——————————— ALLISON CHANDRA LYNN E LULOFS , Appella nt V. STEVEN ADRIAN GONZALES , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 1 31s t District Court

Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2013
- CI
- 08772

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant , Allison Chandra Lynne Lulofs , ha s failed to timely file a brief.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.6( a ) ( governing time to file brief ), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b)2

(allowing involuntary dismissal of ca se). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

**The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:**

(1) The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date:March 14, 2005 |  | /s/ M. G. DUNCAN       
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | M. G. Duncan           
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer

|Date:March 14, 2005 |  | /s/ DENNIS J. STEVERMER
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | Dennis J. Stevermer    
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6095
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MALCOLM EUGENE GOLSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-01-47; CA-02-774) Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 25, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Malcolm Eugene Golson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Malcolm Eugene Golson appeals the district court’s order and opinion denying his motion to compel the Government to file a motion for a reduction in his sentence due to substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. SeeUnited States v. Golson , Nos. CR-01-47, CA-02-774 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
It's business as usual for Fort Meade's property disposal experts
 
  By Public Affairs
  Members of the Fort Meade property disposal team in Maryland continue to support their region's warfighters despite the many challenges presented by the ongoing pandemic. Get to know some of the DLA Disposition Services at Meade personnel and see the wide variety of work they do daily to ensure a continuous flow of used and excess military equipment along the DOD's reverse logistics chain in the embedded video link. 02:50
    
    

    
    
    
    VIDEO  | 02:50
            |
            Logistics On Location: DLA Disposition Services, Ft Meade, MD (long version)
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Kenai, AK Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Taiwan  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Kenai, AK Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Taiwan  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | --     | 7.49   | --     | --     | --     | --    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 10(a)  
 
 AMENDMENT TO THE
 ALLETE DIRECTOR STOCK PLAN
 
 
 The ALLETE Director Stock Plan (the “Plan”), dated May 9, 1995, as amended, is amended as follows, effective May 1, 2010:
 
 1.       Section V is amended by deleting section B. in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
 
 “B.  Each Director shall receive a Stock Payment for services rendered during the Service Period on the first business day of June or as soon as practicable following that date and such Stock Payment shall be equal in value to $60,000, except that the Stock Payment to the Board Chairman shall be equal in value to $90,000.  The number of shares shall be calculated by dividing the amount of the Stock Payment by the fair market value of a share of Common Stock, which for this purpose means the average New York Stock Exchange closing price for the last 5 days up to and including the date that is 10 calendar days prior to June 1 of the Service Period (or on the first business day thereafter if June 1 is not a business day).  To the extent the Director has not elected to defer some or all of the Stock Payment pursuant to the ALLETE Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Deferral Plan II, the Company shall either issue shares or cause the appropriate number of shares of Common Stock to be purchased in the market and delivered to the Director or, at the Company’s election, to the Director’s Invest Direct account or to the Director’s account in such successor dividend reinvestment plan as the Company may establish.  Fractional shares may be paid in cash.  Directors joining the Board during a Service Period after the first business day in June will receive their Stock Payment, valued using the same general methodology described above, as soon as practicable after the first business day following the effective date of their election or appointment to the Board.”
 
 2.                 In all respects not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of the adoption of this amendment to the Director Stock Plan, the Board of Directors of ALLETE, Inc. has caused this amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative this 20th day April, 2010.
 
 ALLETE, Inc.
 
 
 
 By:  Alan R. Hodnik
 Alan R. Hodnik
 President
 ATTEST:
 
 
 By:  Deborah A. Amberg
 Deborah A. Amberg
 SeniorVice President, General Counsel & Secretary
Docket NO: FAA - 2015 - 8438 Dir ID: 2014 - NM - 032 - AD
EXHIBIT 31(a)
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual
report based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Kevin L. BarnettKevin L. BarnettPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Georgia Natural Gas International Deliveries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Georgia Natural Gas International Deliveries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |         |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 3,400 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 36,277 | 84,442 | 108,437 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# Fire Prevention Week: Plan, practice your escape

/ Published Oct. 7, 2019
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
Fire Prevention Week, Oct. 6-12, is a reminder to review fire safety plans at home and work. This year’s theme, “Not every hero wears a cape,” highlights the small but important actions everyone can take to remain safe.  

According to the National Fire Protection Association, U.S. fire departments responded to 357,000 home fires in 2017. These fires resulted in 2,630 deaths and 10,600 injuries. On average, seven people died in a home fire each day from 2012 to 2016.  

“These numbers show that home fires continue to pose a significant threat to safety,” said Lorraine Carli, NFPA’s vice president of outreach and advocacy. “In a typical home fire, you may have as little as one to two minutes to escape safely from the time the smoke alarm sounds. Escape planning and practice can help you make the most of the time you have, giving everyone enough time to get out.”

DLA safety representatives and fire wardens maintain fire evacuation plans and coordinate fire drills with local fire departments. Employees can improve their safety and survival by following these steps:
      - Know where your team’s evacuation map is. This map should be located near a main entrance to the facility or large room where people gather.
      - Find two ways out of every room. While sitting at your desk look for the exit signs above the doors. Find exits that lead directly outside. If you do not have direct access to the outside, follow exit signs anyway; they will lead you to an exterior exit.
      - Check windows to see if they open. Offices typically don’t have windows that open but some older facilities may. If your windows can be opened from the inside, make it your last way out. Doors are safer.
      - Know where your team’s designated meeting place is. Each office has a map showing a meeting place where employees should go during a fire or other emergency. Assembly at a predetermined spot ensures you are accounted for in the event of an emergency. 
      - Practice your drill with everyone in the office. Ensure everyone participates when the local fire prevention office conducts a drill. As new employees come onboard, make sure they know where to go and what to do in the event of a fire.

Many of these tips also apply to home fire safety. At a minimum, identify and practice two ways out of your home.    

For more information and tools to assist in developing fire safety plans, visit the NFPA’s website at www.NFPA.org and click on the public education tab.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 26, 2016

NO. 03-14-00375-CV

Auspro Enterprises, LP, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Transportation, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on March 17, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the district court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s judgment and 

renders judgment severing Subchapters B and C from the Texas Highway Beautification Act as 

unconstitutional content-based restrictions on speech. The appellee shall pay all costs relating to 

this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
No. 12-7524.

#### Jack *v.*Navy Federal Credit Union.

Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb   | Mar   | Apr  | May  | Jun  | Jul   | Aug  | Sep  | Oct  | Nov   | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ----- | -----
|2022                                                                                                                              | --    | --    | --    | --   | --   | --   | --    | --   | --   | --   | 10.79 | 20.02
|2023                                                                                                                              | 13.46 | 16.33 | 12.06 | 5.71 | 9.85 | 5.80 | 10.22 | 7.21 | 8.47 | 8.32 | 8.38  | 8.14 
|2024                                                                                                                              | 8.34  | 7.73  | 9.32  | 8.02 | 7.30 |      |       |      |      |      |       |      
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024