alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                               
|                                                                                                            
|Price of Jackman, ME Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                            
|Price of Jackman, ME Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 7.00   | 7.00  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6.26   | 6.02   | 7.79   | 6.93   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Kondaur Capital Corp. v. Matsuyoshi

CAAP-12-0000867

03/07/2014

Vacated and Remanded
162 A.3d 286

#### IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN ALBERT GLEASON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 045961992)

June 9, 2017

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed with the Court a petition pursuant to *Rule*1:20-3(g) (4) and *Rule*1:20-11, seeking the immediate temporary suspension from practice of MARTIN *328ALBERT GLEASON of BOUND BROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992;

And on May 4, 2017, the Court having ordered respondent to comply with all outstanding requests from the Office of Attorney Ethics within thirty days or be temporarily suspended from practice without further notice;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics having reported to the Court, that respondent has failed to comply with the Court’s Order;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and MARTIN ALBERT GLEASON is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, pending his compliance with the Office of Attorney Ethics in its investigation, and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that MARTIN ALBERT GLEASON be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by MARTIN ALBERT GLEASON pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement expect on application to this Court for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20d dealing with suspended attorneys.
#### Wejs v Heinbockel

2d Dept: 142 AD3d 990

denied
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-12146

____________________

HDI GLOBAL SPECIALTY SE, 

f.k.a. International Insurance Company

of Hannover SE,

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee,

versus

PF HOLDINGS LLC, et al., 

Defendants-Counter Plaintiffs-Third 

Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA,

Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

USCA11 Case: 22-12146 Document: 63-1 Date Filed: 09/20/2023 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-12146

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 4:20-cv-00103-CDL

____________________

Before WILSON, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal arises out of an insurance coverage dispute over 

a $54 million arbitration award rendered against insureds PF 

Holdings LLC and Schoolhouse Road Estates, Inc. After insurer 

HDI Global Specialty SE sought declaratory judgment against 

indemnification, PF Holdings and Schoolhouse brought 

counterclaims against HDI Global and a third-party claim against 

excess insurer National Union Fire Insurance Company requesting 

indemnification. The district court granted summary judgment in 

favor of HDI Global and National Union. PF Holdings and 

Schoolhouse then brought this appeal.

After careful review of the record and briefs, and with the 

benefit of helpful oral argument from all parties, we AFFIRM on 

the basis of the district court’s well-reasoned and thorough 

opinion.

AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 22-12146 Document: 63-1 Date Filed: 09/20/2023 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
      99.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Highway Holdings Limited (the "Company")
      on
      Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roland Kohl, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
      best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      June 28, 2005




/s/
      Roland W. Kohl





Roland
      W.
      Kohl


Chief
      Executive Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-93,993-01

EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER CHAVEZ ALVARADO, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W-366-84445-2021-HC IN THE 366TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of violation of bond/protective order two or more times within

twelve months and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his guiltyplea was involuntary because counsel

was ineffective and because the prosecutor coerced him into pleading guilty. The trial court

recommends dismissing Applicant’s application for non-compliance because he listed his TRN

number as the cause number. We disagree. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Brady v. United States,
2

397 U.S. 742 (1970); Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985). In these circumstances, additional facts

are needed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In

developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial

court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him

at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial

court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether

Applicant’s plea was involuntary. The trial court shall make specific findings as to whether trial

counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s

alleged deficient performance. The trial court shall also make specific findings as to whether the

prosecutor induced Applicant’s guilty plea with improper threats. The trial court may make any

other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety

days from the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the

trial court’s findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other

things, affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts

from hearings and depositions. See TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be

requested by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 7, 2022

Do not publish
#### In the Matter of Armando Colon, Appellant, v Donald Venettozzi, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 751]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Hartman, J.), entered March 4, 2016 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of possessing a weapon. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, and this appeal ensued. The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been returned to petitioner’s inmate account. In view of the foregoing, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and this appeal is now moot *(see Matter of Lashway v Fischer,*112 AD3d 1172, 1172 [2013]; *Matter of Rosales v Prack,*98 AD3d 766, 766 [2012]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Lynch, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
*September 20,*2017

2017-Ohio-7711.]

2017-1316.

#### State ex rel. Grayem v. Bd. of Building Appeals.

In Prohibition. Respondent shall file a responsive pleading pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, September 25, 2017. If respondent files a responsive motion, relator’s response to the motion shall be filed no later than 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 28, 2017.

No requests or stipulations for extension of time to file a responsive pleading shall be permitted, and the clerk of court shall refuse to file any requests or stipulations for extension of time to file a responsive pleading.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,972
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,058
<INVENTORY>                                     28,974
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,253
<PP&E>                                          82,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,679
<BONDS>                                        131,418
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,127
<SALES>                                        197,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,000
<CGS>                                          150,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  177,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                       547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,783)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
13.1



CERTIFICATION
PERSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. & 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Royal Standard Minerals Inc., certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge and belief, the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016, which accompanies this certification,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Royal Standard Minerals Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.
The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|Dated:
    June 20, 2017                  | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|                                          | 
|/s/
    Lonnie Kirsh                      | 
|Lonnie
    Kirsh                          | 
|President
    and Chief Executive Officer |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Xue Fang Zhou, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 291]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered June 26, 2015, said appeal having been *606argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not exces-' sive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Tennessee Heat Content of Natural Gas Deliveries to Consumers  (BTU per Cubic Foot)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Tennessee Heat Content of Natural Gas Deliveries to Consumers  (BTU per Cubic Foot)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,038  | 1,037  | 1,028 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,023  | 1,014  | 1,014  | 1,019  | 1,027  | 1,029  | 1,030  | 1,031  | 1,031  | 1,030 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,031  | 1,031  | 1,029  | 1,025  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-8106.

#### Diaz *v.*McEwen, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-8567.

#### Leach *v.*Bickell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
2017-1680.

#### State v. Lawson.

Hamilton App. No. C-160430. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., not participating.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Morgans Foods, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: December 23, 2009
    /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. HignettSenior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from consolidated
financial statements found on the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, September 30,
1999, and is qualified in Its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                      645
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            14,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 90
<INVENTORY>                                              23,107
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         42,596
<PP&E>                                                   16,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                            7,071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           52,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    13,502
<BONDS>                                                  14,457
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                    106
<OTHER-SE>                                               24,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             52,997
<SALES>                                                  52,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         52,813
<CGS>                                                    36,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            36,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             (3)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           3,891
<INCOME-TAX>                                              1,426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       2,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                              2,465
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.23



</TABLE>