alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         138,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  766,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (73,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     20,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               876,600
<PP&E>                                       8,652,300
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,778,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,212,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          754,300
<BONDS>                                        994,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,721,800
<OTHER-SE>                                    (163,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,212,500
<SALES>                                              0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,616,100
<CGS>                                                0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,848,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (9,400)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                714,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                   262,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            452,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   452,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>WE HAVE NOT STATED SECURITIES SEPARATELY IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT MATERIAL. WE HAVE INCLUDED THEM IN THE "CASH" TAG.
<F2>NET SALES OF TANGIBLE PRODUCTS IS NOT MORE THAN 10% OF TOTAL OPERATING
REVENUES. WE THEREFORE HAVE NOT STATED THESE SALES SEPARATELY IN THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PER REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B).  WE HAVE INCLUDED 
THESE SALES IN THE "TOTAL REVENUES" TAG.
<F3>WE HAVE INCLUDED COST OF TANGIBLE GOODS SOLD IN COST OF SERVICE AND
PRODUCTS IN OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE "TOTAL COST" TAG, PER
REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B).
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### BBCN Bank, Formerly Known as Nara Bank, Respondent-Appellant, v 12th Avenue Restaurant Group Inc et al., Defendants, and Robert N. Swetnick, Appellant-Respondent.

[55 NYS3d 225]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered February 16, 2016, which denied defendant Robert N. Swetnick’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him, and denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the third and tenth causes of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant Swetnick’s motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

On appeal, plaintiff concedes that it seeks to hold Swetnick liable for aiding and abetting a fraudulent conveyance, not for aiding and abetting fraud generally. The cause of action for aiding and abetting a fraudulent conveyance also should have been dismissed, because there is no cause of action for aiding *624and abetting a fraudulent conveyance against a person, such as Swetnick in this case, who is alleged merely to have assisted in effecting the transfer, in a professional capacity, and who is not alleged to have been a transferee of the assets or to have benefited from the transaction *(see Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v Porco,*75 NY2d 840, 842 [1990]; *Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. v 8an Capital Partners Master Fund, L.P.,*132 AD3d 402, 402 [1st Dept 2015]; *Estate of Shefner v Beraudiere,*127 AD3d 442 [2015]; *Cahen-Vorburger v Vorburger,*41 AD3d 281, 282 [1st Dept 2007]; *Gallant v Kanterman,*198 AD2d 76, 80 [1st Dept 1993]; *see also Roselink Invs., L.L.C. v Shenkman,*386 F Supp 2d 209, 226-227 [SD NY 2004]; *Geren v Quantum Chem. Corp.,*832 F Supp 728, 736 [SD NY 1993], *affd*99 F3d 401 [2d Cir 1995]; *In re Parker,*399 BR 577, 580-581 [ED NY 2009]). Since the substantive claim against Swetnick fails as a matter of law, the tenth cause of action, for attorney’s fees pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law § 276-a, must also be dismissed as against him.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
#### Hartline v. Public School Employees' Retirement Bd.

10/14/2015

138 MAL (2015)

Denied
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00128-CR

Ryan Alexander Mulder, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. CR2017-718, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E

A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by 

a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies 

of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate 

record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to 

the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). 

Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.

Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court

to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written 

verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on 

or before September 23, 2019. See id. at 321.
2

It is ordered on September 11, 2019.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Kenneth L. Hignett, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan’s Foods, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of May 21, 2006, based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: July 12, 2006 /s/ Kenneth L. Hignett   Kenneth L. Hignett,   Senior Vice President,
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: 5 / 14 /1 5 TO: C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: Allen Fawcett , EPA SUBJECT: 5 /1 3 /1 5 , NRDC Meeting Regarding Proposed C lean Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on 5 /1 3 /1 5 to discuss the treatment of biomass in the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014
. **ATTENDEES** Sarah Dunham, OAR EPA Paul Gunning, OAR EPA Allen Fawcett , O AR EPA Sara Ohrel, OAR EPA Jefferson Cole, OAR EPA Nathanael Green, NRDC Sami Yassa, NRDC Sasha Stashwick, NRDC Ben Longstreth, NRDC Debbie Hammel, NRDC
#### Com. v. McLaughlin 25

04/13/2016

12 EAL (2016)

25

. Justice DONOHUE and Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 651
Fall Back: Change your clocks, batteries during daylight saving time
 
  By Eric Crognale, Fire Inspector, DLA Installation Management Richmond
  Daylight saving time is Nov. 1. As you move your clocks back an hour, don’t forget to change the batteries in your smoke detectors and other home safety devices. Having a working smoke detector can mean the difference between life and death. The death rate is twice as high for home fires where the smoke detectors are either absent or not working, according to a 2019 report by National Fire Protection Association researcher Marty Ahrens.
 
A smoke detector cannot operate without working batteries, so this daylight saving time is an excellent opportunity to remind yourself to replace the batteries in your smoke detectors at home. In addition, you should test them at least once per month so you know if batteries need to be replaced. The National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code (NFPA 72) requires that a working smoke detector be installed in every room used for sleeping and outside every sleeping area, as well as on every level of the home including the basement. Install new smoke detectors either on the ceiling, or on a wall within 12 inches (30cm) of the ceiling. Understand that smoke rises to the highest point of the ceiling and then builds downward. The lower your smoke detectors, the longer it will take for the smoke to reach the sensor to activate the alarm. If you have any appliances in your home that use wood or natural gas for fuel, you should have at least one carbon monoxide (CO) detector. Like the smoke detectors, you should also change the batteries in your CO detector at least once per year. Let daylight saving time serve as a reminder that when you change your clocks, also change your batteries in your smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. A few minutes could save your life.
2017-0205.

#### In re Application of Dayton Power & Light Co.

Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 12-426-EL-SSO, 12-427-EL-ATA, 12-428-EL-AAM, 12-429-EL-WVR, and 12-672-EL-RDR. On application for dismissal filed by appellant Ohio Energy Group. Application granted. The other appeals in this cause remain pending.
No. 12-7441.

#### McCoy *v.*Pace et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### Com. v. Jones

08/23/2016

92 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 187
EXHIBIT 32.02


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005,  as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Venerando J.
Indelicato,  Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

May 16, 2005

                                           /s/ Venerando J. Indelicato
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Venerando J. Indelicato
                                           Principal Financial Officer





                                       21
#### Pierre v. MP Cloverly Partners, LP

03/23/2016

592 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 64
2017-1176.

#### Rock v. Collins.

In Mandamus. On respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed. On relator’s motion to consolidate cases. Motion denied as moot.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2 **CERTIFICATIONS**I, Kenneth L. Hignett, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan’s Foods, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the “Evaluation Date”); andc) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whetheror not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.        Date: December 21, 2005     /s/ Kenneth L. Hignett        Kenneth L. Hignett,        Senior Vice President,     Chief Financial Officer & Secretary  
16
Adjustments to the South Carolina State Implementation Plan 

The adjustments to the South Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) include updates to the South 

Carolina 8-Hour Ozone Attainment Demonstration for the Portion of York County, South Carolina within 

the Rock Hill-Fort Mill Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization and Appendix O, 

which addresses Reasonable Further Progress (RFP). Both were originally submitted to the EPA on 

August 31, 2007, and resubmitted November 13, 2009.

Attainment Demonstration 

The nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions and NOx motor vehicle emissions budget (MVEB) that appear 

in Tables VII-1 and VII-2 on page 81 of the attainment demonstration narrative and in Tables F.3-4 and 

F.3-5, on page 11 of Appendix F.3, have been updated. The Mobile6.2 files shown beginning on page 13 

of Appendix F.3 were also updated. 

Volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, a VOC budget, and text updates reflecting the addition 

of the VOC budget have been added to the attainment demonstration narrative and Appendix F.3. These 

updates can be found on page 81 of the attainment demonstration narrative and pages 7 and 10-11 of 

Appendix F.3. 

Appendix O: Reasonable Further Progress

 Appendix O has been amended with the addition of Section V, RFP 2008 volatile organic compound 

(VOC) MVEB.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2112 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2112

   To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 to 
  postpone until 1997 the base closure process otherwise scheduled to 
                           commence in 1995.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 12 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

  Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Lott, Mr. Inouye, and Mrs. Boxer) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 to 
  postpone until 1997 the base closure process otherwise scheduled to 
                           commence in 1995.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POSTPONEMENT OF COMMENCEMENT OF 1995 ROUND OF BASE CLOSURE 
              PROCESS.

    The Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of 
title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended--
            (1) in section 2902--
                    (A) by striking out clause (iii) of subsection 
                (c)(1)(B) and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
            ``(iii) by no later than January 3, 1997, in the case of 
        members of the Commission whose terms will expire at the end of 
        the first session of the 105th Congress.'';
                    (B) by striking out ``1995'' in subsection 
                (c)(1)(C) and inserting in lieu thereof ``1997'';
                    (C) by striking out ``1995'' in subsection (e)(1) 
                and inserting in lieu thereof ``1997''; and
                    (D) by striking out ``December 31, 1995'' in 
                subsection (L) and inserting in lieu thereof ``December 
                31, 1997'';
            (2) in section 2903--
                    (A) by striking out ``1996'' in subsection (a)(1) 
                and inserting in lieu thereof ``1998''; and
                    (B) by striking out ``March 1, 1995,'' in 
                subsection (c)(1) and inserting in lieu thereof ``March 
                1, 1997,''; and
            (3) in section 2909(a), by striking out ``December 31, 
        1995,'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``December 31, 1997,''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          733178
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   900229
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    2049755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4537402
<PP&E>                                         6574779
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2869390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9550548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1439125
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        825649
<OTHER-SE>                                     3940402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9550548
<SALES>                                       10829329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              10829329
<CGS>                                          8393103
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 10618476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                133126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               79567
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  77727
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (20019)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     97746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>