alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Ryan V. Daniels, Appellant, v Konnie Kelly Daniels, Respondent.

[51 NYS3d 896]

*851Appeal by the father from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Colleen Fondulis, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated March 11, 2016. The order dismissed the father’s petitions to modify two orders of custody and visitation regarding the parties’ two minor children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, codified in article 5-A of the Domestic Relations Law (hereinafter UCCJEA), a court in this State that has made an initial custody determination has exclusive continuing jurisdiction over that determination until it finds, as is relevant here, that the child does not have a “significant connection” with New York, and “substantial evidence is no longer available in this state concerning the child’s care, protection, training, and personal relationships” (Domestic Relations Law § 76-a [1] [a]; *see Matter of Wnorowska v*Wnorowski, 76 AD3d 714 [2010]).

Here, the Family Court properly determined that it should relinquish jurisdiction where the subject children, who have lived with the mother in Colorado since October 2014, do not have a significant connection with New York, and substantial evidence is no longer available in this State concerning the children’s care, protection, training, and personal relationships *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 76-a [1] [a]; *Matter of Miller v Shaw,*123 AD3d 1131, 1132 [2014]; *Matter of Mojica v Denson,*120 AD3d 691, 692 [2014]).

Chambers, J.P., Roman, Miller and Connolly, JJ., concur.
CAAP-11-0000713

#### Blau v. AIG Hawaii Ins. Co.

Affirmed
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3568

_____________________________

RODERICK C. HALLMON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

January 8, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.
2016-1753.

#### ARCP LS S. Euclid, OH, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2015-1852. On joint motion to remand the appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals in order to implement a settlement. Cause remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to take further action as appropriate.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,933]


University Technical Services, Incorporated, Canton, New York; 
Amended Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Negative Determination Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on November 17, 
1997, applicable to all workers of University Technical Services, 
Incorporated, San Diego, California. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on December 10, 1997 (62 FR 65100).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
negative determination for workers of the subject firm. New findings 
show that the Department incorrectly identified the subject firm 
location. The investigation conducted for the subject firm was 
conducted on behalf of workers engaged in providing operations and 
maintenance services for electricity generation located in Canton, New 
York. San Diego, California is the Administrative Services office of 
the subject firm and is not the subject of the investigation. The 
Department is amending the negative determination to correctly identify 
the city and state to read Canton, New York.

Conclusion

    After careful review, I determine that all workers of University 
Technical Services, Incorporated, Canton, New York are denied 
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 222 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 23rd day of December 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-1478 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
2017-0394.

#### State v. Fishel.

Stark App. No. 2016 CA 00037.
DLA Distribution Expeditionary on the ground at Maxwell Air Force Base in support of FEMA
 
  By Dawn Bonsell, DLA Distribution Public Affairs
  The Defense Logistics Agency Expeditionary team arrived at Maxwell Air Force Base, Montgomery, Alabama, over the weekend to help establish the Incident Staging Base for U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency’s preparation efforts for Hurricane Dorian– a Category 3 storm. Upon arrival, the DDXX team provided a phenomenal demonstration of swift teamwork and operational integration on the ground with FEMA personnel.
 
DLA is closely aligned with U.S. Northern Command, as Department of Defense synchronizer, FEMA and the potentially impacted states as Hurricane Dorian approaches. The storm’s center was located about 135 miles southeast of Jacksonville, Florida, Wednesday morning, according to the National Hurricane Center. 
ISB Maxwell is currently operating seven days per week with a total number of 46 personnel (FEMA-22, DLA-24) on ground in support of trailer transfer operations, information technology communications, FEMA commodity visibility, staging area management, security, and property accountability.  The 24-person DDXX team, led by Army MAJ. Edward Strzalkowski, commander, deployed to Maxwell AFB to provide support to FEMA’s wide range of services, supplies, and disaster relief efforts with logistics expertise as well as equipment including the mobile command trailer, a yard truck and forklifts. DDXX has received over 600 trucks bearing over 500,000 shelf stable meals to be distributed to communities in Hurricane Dorian’s path. This expeditionary distribution capability gives FEMA significant responsiveness and flexibility to flow critical relief supplies, to include food, water, fuel, and generators, to the impacted areas.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS OFCEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I, TomW. Olofson, Chief Executive Officer of EPIQ Systems, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, UnitedStates Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge, (1) the annual report on Form 10-Kof the Company to which this Exhibit is attached (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/ TOM  W. OLOFSON        |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Tom W. Olofson             |
| Dated: March 1,  2005 |

 

I,Elizabeth M. Braham, Chief Financial Officer of EPIQ Systems, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, UnitedStates Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge, (1) the annual report on Form 10-Kof the Company to which this Exhibit is attached (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
| /s/ ELIZABETH  M. BRAHAM   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Elizabeth M. Braham        |
| Dated: March 1,  2005 |

 

----
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|Price Liquefied Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas Exports Price to Egypt (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Price Liquefied Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas Exports Price to Egypt (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 6.46   | 4.93   | 3.27   | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[UTU-75891]


Utah; Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

June 1, 1998.
    In accordance with Title IV of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty 
Management Act (Pub. L. 97-451), a petition for reinstatement of oil 
and gas lease UTU-75891 for lands in Grand County, Utah, was timely 
filed and required rentals accruing from January 1, 1998, the date of 
termination, have been paid.
    The lessee has agreed to new lease terms for rentals and royalties 
at rates of $5 per acre and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The $500 
administrative fee has been paid and the lessee has reimbursed the 
Bureau of Land Management for the cost of publishing this notice.
    Having met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as 
set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 
(30 U.S.C. 188), the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease UTU-75891, effective January 1, 1998, subject to the 
original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and 
royalty rates cited above.
Robert Lopez,
Group Leader, Minerals Adjudication Group.
[FR Doc. 98-14953 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL S. YELLEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-16344

D.C. No. 1:14-cv-00134-JMSBMK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

J. Michael Seabright, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 16, 2016**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Michael S. Yellen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action alleging violations of 

federal constitutional law and international law arising from the 1893 overthrow of 

the Hawaiian monarchy and Hawaii’s subsequent annexation by the United States. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 24 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-16344 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Pakootas v. 

Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd., 646 F.3d 1214, 1218 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Yellen’s action because his claims

presented non-justiciable political questions over which the district court lacked 

subject matter jurisdiction. See Corrie v. Caterpillar, Inc., 503 F.3d 974, 980 (9th 

Cir. 2007) (holding that “the presence of a political question deprives a court of 

subject matter jurisdiction” and explaining that a non-justiciable political question 

is found when there is “a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the 

issue to a coordinate political department” (citation and internal quotation marks 

omitted)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing without leave to 

amend. See McQuillion v. Schwarzenegger, 369 F.3d 1091, 1099 (9th Cir. 2004) 

(finding “[t]he district court did not err in denying leave to amend because 

amendment would have been futile”).

In light of our disposition, we do not address the merits of Yellen’s claims.

We reject as without merit Yellen’s contention that he was entitled to 

discovery. 
3 14-16344 

Yellen’s expedited motion for injunctive relief and/or permanent injunction, 

filed on July 15, 2016, is denied.

AFFIRMED.
2017-0713.

#### Woods Cove III, L.L.C. v. Spy.

Cuyahoga App. No. 105599. Appellant’s motion for leave to proceed denied as moot.
#### David Hayes et al., Appellants, v Douglas Byington et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[769 NYS2d 765]

— Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Ontario County (Doran, J.), entered October 7, 2002, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to set aside part of a verdict and for a new trial on damages only.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens,*155 AD2d 435 [1989]; *see also*CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Thailand (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Thailand (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 6.42  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 8.49   | 7.98   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 6
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 6
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 6
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 6
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 23, 2015

No. 04-14-00246-CR

Destyn David FREDERICK,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-09-00041-CRL

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is deemed filed as of April 20, 2015.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of George Washington Bridge Bus Station Development Venture, LLC, Respondent, v Associated Specialty Contracting, Inc., Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 321]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered on or about August 8, 2016, which granted the petition to discharge respondent’s mechanic’s lien on the subject property, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court correctly granted the petition to discharge the mechanic’s lien filed by respondent. It is well-settled that a private mechanic’s lien may not attach to privately-leased, but *526publicly-owned, land *(see Matter of Paerdegat Boat & Racquet Club v Zarrelli,*57 NY2d 966, 968 [1982], *revg on concurring in part, dissenting in part op of Hopkins, J.,*83 AD2d 444, 452 [2d Dept 1981]; *Avon Elec. Supplies v Voltaic Elec. Co.,*203 AD2d 404, 405 [2d Dept 1994]; *T.N.T. Coatings v County of Nassau,*114 AD2d 1027, 1028 [2d Dept 1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 608 [1986]). Since the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Port Authority), the owner of the subject property, is a “public corporation” within the contemplation of the Lien Law, the George Washington Bridge Bus Station constituted a “public improvement” within the meaning of the Lien Law, despite petitioner’s private leasehold interest in the property (Lien Law § 2 [8]; General Construction Law § 66 [1], [4]; *see Matter of World Trade Ctr. Bombing Litig.,*93 NY2d 1, 10 [1999]; *Matter of Carland Constr. Co. v Infilco Degremont,*152 AD2d 694, 695 [2d Dept 1989]).

Respondent’s reliance on the exception to the general rule, provided by Lien Law § 2 (7), is misplaced, inasmuch as that section applies only to property owned by Industrial Development Agencies, which the Port Authority is not *(see Davidson Pipe Supply Co. v Wyoming County Indus. Dev. Agency,*85 NY2d 281, 287 [1995]; *Matter of PMNC v Brothers Insulation Co.,*266 AD2d 293, 294 [2d Dept 1999]).

We have considered respondent’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
# L_2011325DE.01006302.xml

| 8.12.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 325/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 325/63

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses 2011/791/EU des Rates vom 8. November 2011 zur Änderung des Beschlusses 2011/734/EU gerichtet an Griechenland zwecks Ausweitung und Intensivierung der haushaltspolitischen Überwachung und zur Inverzugsetzung Griechenlands mit der Maßgabe, die zur Beendigung des übermäßigen Defizits als notwendig erachteten Maßnahmen zu treffen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 320 vom 3. Dezember 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 320 vom 3. Dezember 2011

Seite 31, Unterschrift:

anstatt:

„Für den Rat

Der Präsident

J. VINCENT-ROSTOWSKI“

muss es heißen:

„Für den Rat

Der Präsident

W. PAWLAK“.

---
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOl'!t) 

# E**~**

# VE D FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATioNf-:t · . • ill OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

### FEB 09 2015

WASHINGTON, D.C.**------------------------------------~H~F~P~,R~I~N~GDOCKET** In the Matter ofLaurel Avionics Company 2013EA030023

## ~ 

# Q 

# !

# 5 - Ud 0**~** Judge Not Assigned

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.204(b), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully requested to be forwarded as follows:: Zachary M. Berman Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 

### 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 Telephone: 718 553-3258 Facsimile: 718 995-5699 Respectfully submitted, Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. Regional Counsel

By:

# }J~ Zach M. Berman Attorney Dated:

# L-/ ""> { (

# ~CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that on this day copies ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance were placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail

- Return Receipt Requested addressed as follows:

John V. Sabel Aviation Advisors, LLC 2515 Minton Drive Moon Township, PA 15108

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014**~IF** FILING BYFEDERAL EXPRESS Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 600 Independence Avenue, SW Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430

- t, 

### 2015 Date:

______ _ is ooks Paralegal Specialist Office ofRegional Counsel 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434

2
No. 12-8656.

#### Lumpkins *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.