alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Junior Enlisted Logisticians Expand Knowledge at Workshop

/ Published July 28, 2019
KAISERSLAUTERN, Germany, 
For the first time, junior enlisted logisticians from across Europe came together April 22 for a one-week transportation knowledge management workshop at Kleber Kaserne, Kaiserslautern.Soldiers from 21st Theater Sustainment Command, 16th Sustainment Brigade, Surface Deployment and Distribution Command and 7th Mission Support Command, learned and practiced with multiple digital tracking and information systems currently used in U.S. Army Europe sustainment operations, like setting the European theater.Setting the theater involves tracking and moving thousands of pieces of a deploying unit’s equipment set from the United States, into Europe, then through Europe to their final destinations.“With the systems that we’re on and accessing, in a timely manner service members can capture the equipment that comes into U.S. Army Europe,” said Chief Warrant Officer 3 Thomas Fernandez, Plans and Operations Officer, 39th Movement Control Battalion.“They can capture the equipment and start the distribution process much faster by coordinating with the unit, dragging their data off the systems instead of waiting for information to be fed [to them],” Fernandez said. “Being able to see the equipment long before it arrives definitely helps the Joint Logistics Enterprise.”Often times, junior logisticians are at the tip of the sustainment operations spear. The training expands their knowledge and mission readiness.“A lot of the units, we have junior Soldiers that come here right out of AIT. That confidence – that knowledge, where you know your role – it creates a common understanding of what you are supposed to do,” Fernandez added.Small Movement Control Teams are at the forefront of receiving the equipment. Systems like the Distributional Retrograde Adaptive Planning and Execution Management, or DRAM, Single Mobility System and National Radio Frequency-In-Transit Visibility server expand the capabilities of logisticians at the ports.“You hear about these things, but you don’t use them,” said Sgt. Brandon Peterson, a junior logistician with 1181st Deployment Distribution Support Team, 598th Transportation Brigade. “So, once we get that hands-on experience it helps us with our job. As long as you know how to use these systems, you can fall into a position easily.”“It gives you a broader view of your job as a logistician,” he added.The workshop helped synchronize use of the multiple digital equipment tracking platforms used by U.S. Army Europe logisticians. Organizers hope to continue workshops like this to build readiness and increase efficiency in sustainment operations.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 21st Theater Sustainment Command website.*
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| \s\ James H. Moore      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James H. Moore          |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| May 14, 2010       |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MinesManagement, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Buchanan Capital Markets, LLC, Formerly Known as Marcum Buchanan Associates, LLC, Appellant, v Joanne DeLucca et al., Defendants, and Michael Callahan, Respondent.

[51 NYS3d 417]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered July 29, 2016, which granted defendant Michael Callahan’s motion to stay arbitration demanded by plaintiff pursuant to CPLR 7503 (c), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant Callahan entered into an employment agreement with Marcum Buchanan Associates, LLC (Marcum), which *437contained noncompete and arbitration clauses, and which provided that Callahan’s services “are special, unique and of extraordinary character” and that the parties had “a special confidential relationship.” Such personal services contracts generally are not freely assignable *(see Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc.,*6 NY3d 471, 482 [2006], *cert dismissed*548 US 940 [2006]; *Eisner Computer Solutions v Gluckstern,*293 AD2d 289 [1st Dept 2002]). While covenants not to compete in employment contracts may be assignable without the parties’ consent *(id.),*that depends on the parties’ intent *(see Archer Worldwide v Mansbach,*289 AD2d 349 [2d Dept 2001]). Plaintiff Buchanan Capital Markets, LLC (Buchanan), as the proponent of arbitration, “has the burden of demonstrating that the parties agreed to arbitrate the dispute at issue” *(Eiseman Levine Lehrhaupt & Kakoyiannis, P.C. v Torino Jewelers, Ltd.,*44 AD3d 581, 583 [1st Dept 2007]), and has failed to provide evidence that the parties intended Callahan’s agreement with Marcum “to be assignable when it was originally executed” *(Archer Worldwide*at 349).

Moreover, the evidence does not support Buchanan’s contention that there was no assignment, but merely a change of name after Vincent Buchanan purchased Marcum. Vincent Buchanan himself averred that there was an assignment of “assets, rights, and liabilities” from Marcum to Buchanan, and his affidavit fails to establish that Buchanan continued as the same company after the purchase.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00512

- CR

Robert Lee CRIDER , Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B17583

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION.

SIGNED September 25, 2019.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice
2017-1206.

#### In re D.F.

Coshocton App. Nos. 2016CA0015 and 2016CA0016, 2017-Ohio-7307. On motion for stay of appellate decision. Motion granted.

O’Donnell and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.
#### Couri v Siebert

App Div, 1st Dept: 2017 NY Slip Op 70566(U)

denied
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Louisiana--State Offshore Natural Gas Dry Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Louisiana--State Offshore Natural Gas Dry Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 68,145 |        | 58,077 | 48,945 | 42,477 | 30,579 | 22,349 | 22,164
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 17,136 | 9,585  | 5,730  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended November 7,
2010, (the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: December 22, 2010/s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer 20
2017-1534.

#### Dixon v. State.

In Habeas Corpus. On petitioner’s motion to submit evidence. Motion denied as moot.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
   2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
Rule 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: July 9, 2008
    /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. HignettSenior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary 16
# Survey results shape agency culture

/ Published Oct. 1, 2020

Expanded work-life programs, enhanced career development opportunities and improved agency-wide communication are a few of the impacts on Energy employees from the previous Defense Logistics Agency Culture/Climate Survey.

Since 2003, the Denison survey has assessed the culture of the DLA workforce. Beginning Oct. 9, employees will once again have the opportunity to participate and help shape the agency’s future.

“I’ve seen many positive impacts from the DLA culture and climate survey,” said Chad Carter, DLA Energy Operations Center Watch Officer. “I’m a big fan, especially how DLA responds. They are looking to improve just like we all are.”

Carter, a 13-year DLA Energy employee, and several other DLA employees volunteered to share their thoughts in a series of videos on why they believe all of team DLA should take the survey.

**

John L. Phinisey III is a 12-year DLA Energy employee and previously held the deputy director position for both DLA Energy Europe & Africa and DLA Energy Americas West. He was selected for the DLA Executive Development Program and is currently a student at the Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security & Resource Strategy.

He said the ability to give feedback is a gift.

“The survey gives us a direct voice on how we feel about our organization and its culture,” he said. “As an empowered employee who is vested in the success of this organization, I believe it’s my duty to provide leadership with feedback when possible.”

The survey is confidential and administered by a private survey contractor. The contractor provides a report of results for all of DLA and for groups in the various organizational codes and activities, including DLA Energy.

“The survey takes only 30-45 minutes to complete,” said DLA Energy Culture Climate Champion Drake Utley. “Supervisors are instructed to allow employees time to complete the survey during the workday.”

Employees have options to write-in open-ended responses throughout the survey. These comments are provided to senior leaders in an Excel spreadsheet, with the comment, the “code/theme” that it was categorized into, and the large Major Subordinate Command or J code, but not individual work units. To protect employees’ privacy, demographic information or work unit identifiers are not provided with the survey results.

“It’s important that we all take time to provide feedback on how we feel about our organization and help define tangible objects for change,” Phinisey added.

Employees will receive the survey link in their email beginning Oct. 9 and have until Nov. 13 to complete it. Let your voice be heard to help make DLA an even better place to work!
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2017

To prohibit regulations that classify, enhance, or diminish the privileges

and immunities of an Indian tribe relative to other federally recognized

Indian tribes, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 14 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. INOUYE) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To prohibit regulations that classify, enhance, or diminish

the privileges and immunities of an Indian tribe relative

to other federally recognized Indian tribes, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 16 of the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C.

4 476) is amended by adding at the end the following new

5 subsections:

6 ‘‘(f) PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF INDIAN

7 TRIBES; PROHIBITION ON NEW REGULATIONS.—Depart8 ments or agencies of the United States shall not promul-
2

•S 2017 IS

1 gate any regulation or make any decision or determination

2 pursuant to the Act of June 18, 1934, as amended or any

3 other Act of Congress with respect to a federally recog4 nized Indian tribe that classifies, enhances, or diminishes

5 the privileges and immunities available to the Indian tribe

6 relative to other federally recognized tribes by virtue of

7 their status as Indian tribes.

8 ‘‘(g) PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF INDIAN

9 TRIBES; EXISTING REGULATIONS.—Any regulation or ad10 ministrative decision or determination of a department or

11 agency of the United States that is in existence or effect

12 on the date of enactment of this Act and that classifies,

13 enhances, or diminishes the privileges and immunities

14 available to a federally recognized Indian tribe relative to

15 the privileges and immunities available to other federally

16 recognized tribes by virtue of their status as Indian tribes

17 shall have no force or effect.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28382-28383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13784]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6102-2]


Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Petition for Exemption--Class I Hazardous Waste 
Injection; Great Lakes Chemical Corporation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final decision on injection well no migration 
petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that an exemption to the land disposal 
restrictions under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments to the 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act has been granted to Great Lakes 
Chemical Corporation (GLCC), for two Class I injection wells located at 
El Dorado, Arkansas. As required by 40 CFR part 148, the company has 
adequately demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Environmental 
Protection Agency by petition and supporting documentation that, to a 
reasonable degree of certainty, there will be no migration of hazardous 
constituents from the injection zone for as long as the waste remains 
hazardous. This final decision allows the underground injection by 
GLCC, of the specific restricted hazardous wastes identified in the 
exemption, into two Class I hazardous waste injection wells (WDW-5 and 
WDW-6) at the El Dorado, Arkansas facility, until July 1, 2005, unless 
EPA moves to terminate the exemption under provisions of 40 CFR 148.24. 
As required by 40 CFR 148.22(b) and 124.10, a public notice was issued 
March 6, 1998. The public comment period closed on April 20, 1998. No 
comments were received. This decision constitutes final Agency action 
and there is no Administrative appeal.

DATES: This action is effective as of May 13, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition and all pertinent information 
relating thereto

[[Page 28383]]

are on file at the following location: Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region 6, Water Quality Protection Division, Source Water Protection 
Branch (6WQ-SG) 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/
UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-7165.
Oscar Ramirez, Jr.,
Acting Director, Water Quality Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 98-13784 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EXHIBIT 99.2

             Statement Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the
             Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      The undersigned, George E. Young, III, is the Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Falmouth Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").
This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

      A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
            (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

      B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
            covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the
Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the
Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It
is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

December 19, 2002                      /s/ George E. Young, III
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       George E. Young, III
                                       Senior Vice President and Chief
                                       Financial Officer

<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
THIRD QUARTER REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0000065873
<NAME>                    ALLTEL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                     50,049
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                             775,440
<ALLOWANCES>                               30,605
<INVENTORY>                                81,860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,002,881
<PP&E>                                  7,799,756
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,292,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          8,926,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,099,449
<BONDS>                                 3,566,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       5,018
<PREFERRED>                                 9,125
<COMMON>                                  274,429
<OTHER-SE>                              2,714,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            8,926,844
<SALES>                                   395,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        3,820,615
<CGS>                                     380,962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           3,234,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          307,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        199,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           711,361
<INCOME-TAX>                              337,648
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       373,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              373,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                1.35
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The
undersigned, Susan E. Knight, the Chief Financial Officer of MTS Systems
Corporation (the Company), has executed this Certification in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010 (the
Report).

The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: May 6,
2010

| |                                             | 
| | ------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ SUSAN E.
 KNIGHT                        | 
| | Susan E.
 Knight                            | 
| | Vice
 President and Chief Financial Officer | 

---