alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Israel (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Israel (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May  | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2018                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | 6.48 |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |      |     |     | W   |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000865

30-JUN-2017

03:56 PM
March 25, 2013

No. 11-708.

No. 11-1343.

#### Ganghua Liu *v.*Pearson Education, Inc., et al. Kumar et al. *v.*Pearson Education, Inc., et al.

C. A. 2d Cir.; and

C. A. 2d Cir. Reported below: 452 Fed. Appx. 11. Cer-tiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of *Kirtsaeng*v. *John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ante,*p. 519.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
### . rHE 

## SJJ\TE ....., ,_.,. . ..

## P.~pa~ent;qfT;r~nsportationand**oif~_LA·.**

# sKA··.**<:~»/'f\TMENTOF** 

## · · · · · · · · Public 

## Facilities· · ·· '·**'"'!·~or)·'"A'J"'O~'** / . ...,; ...**~:~)** ·-"t ... 

### nt i**~~~** 

### ..,. (" ")E"n r,·]·jr' i\ '(\ STATEWIDE AVIATION J )t'**,~.nF\** t.... )l··.f,J GOVERNOR SEAN PA.RNELL July 24, 2012 Mr. Dennis J. DeVany Chief,EAS and Domestic Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 lZ

Re: Essential Air Service at Manley Hot Springs (MLY) and Minto (51Z) 

### DOCKET DOT-OST-2004-17563 Dear Mr. DeVany, P.O. Box 196900 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6900 Main: 907.269.0730

Fax: 907.269.0489

I am writing to express my strong support for the continuation ofthe Essential Air Service (EAS) program in Alaska and to emphasize the crucial access it provides to our remote communities. Manley Hot Springs and Minto depend on scheduled air carrier service for freight, passenger, and mail service for basic necessities, routine health services, and economic welfare. The State ofAlaska continues to assert that the local residents are generallybest positioned to comment on particular schedules or air carriers, andtherefore we think the community should

. provide comments to you on those specitlc areas.

Also I want to inform you that Alaska, DOT&PF is building a new airport at Manley that wil-l have a longer and wider runway, plusit will have Medium Intensity Runway Lights. This new nmway will make aircraft operations safer for the flying public. I expect the new airp01t to be operational beginning in the fall of2013. · I respectfully urge US DOT to support and continue the EAS service at Manley and Minto. Sincerely,
Deputy Commissioner - Aviation

''Get Alaska fvfoving through service andinfhtstructure."
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0603 Directorate ID: 2009-SW-079-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Model 206L, 206L-1, 206L-3, 206L-4 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 783 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect a crack in a tailboom attachment fitting.

Costs:

We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order to comply with this 

AD. At an average labor rate of $85 per hour, inspecting the fitting will require about 1 work 

hour, for a cost per helicopter of $85 and a total cost to U.S. operators of $66,555 per inspection 

cycle. 

We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs or replacements that would 

be required based on the results of the proposed inspection. We have no way of determining the 

number of aircraft that might need these repairs or replacements. Repairing a damaged fitting 

would require about 8 work-hours and required parts would cost about $10, for a cost per 

helicopter of $690. Replacing a fitting which is damaged beyond the allowable repair limits 

would require about 8 work-hours and required parts would cost about $793, for a cost per 

helicopter of $1,473. Replacing a loose rivet would require about 1 work-hour, and required parts 

would cost about $1, for a cost per helicopter of $86.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Sharon Miles
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Report Request ID: 1468593 Report Code: AMP430 Aug. 1, 2016

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: AKMEBUST

State County City Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region

32

32

32

031

031

031

0016

0025

1005

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

CRITERIA 42101

SELECTED OPTIONS

OZONE EVALUATION

MERGE PDF FILES

AGENCY ROLE

Option Type Option Value

SEASONAL-HOURLY

YES

REPORTING

SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Order Column

EPA_REGION

STATE_CODE

MONITOR_TYPE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

PARAMETER_CODE

POC

DATE CRITERIA

2016

Start Date End Date

01 12 2016

Tribal

Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS

Standard Description

CO 1-hour 1971
Aug. 1, 2016

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 1 of 3

MONITORS NOT REPORTING 
Aug. 1, 2016

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 2 of 3

DATE RANGE: 

REGION: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

Nevada MONITOR TYPE: 

Washoe County District Health Department

SLAMS

JAN. 01, 2016 THRU DEC. 31, 2016

SITE ID

CITY

ADDRESS

PARAMETER POC DURATION

METHOD

------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS -------------------------------

NUMBER / PERCENT

32-031-0016

32-031-0025

32-031-1005

42101

42101

42101

Carbon monoxide

Carbon monoxide

Carbon monoxide

1

1

1

1

1

1

Reno

Reno

Sparks

301 A STATE STREET, RENO, NV 89502

684A STATE ROUTE 341, RENO NV 89521

750 4TH ST, SPARKS, NV 89431

593

093

093

725

742

742

 97%

 100%

 100%

682

693

691

 98%

 100%

 99%

607

740

739

 82%

 99%

 99%

2014

2175

2172

 39%

 42%

 42%

MONITORS REPORTING 

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR

STATE:

REP ORG:
Aug. 1, 2016

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 3 of 3

DATE RANGE: 

REGION: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

Nevada

MONITOR TYPE: 

Washoe County District Health Department

SLAMS

JAN. 01, 2016 THRU DEC. 31, 2016

PARAMETER ACTIVE MONITORS # NOT REPORTING # MONITORS > 75% MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS

42101 Carbon monoxide 3 0 0 41.0%

3 0 0 41.0%

3 0 0 41.0%

3 0 0 41.0%

3 0 0 41.0%

3 0 0 41.0%

Washoe County District Health Department

Nevada

REGION SUMMARY: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

REPORT SUMMARY: 

MT SUMMARY: SLAMS

REPORT SUMMARY

STATE:

STATE SUMMARY: 

REP ORG:

RO SUMMARY:
#### Paramount Pictures Corp. v Allianz Risk Transfer AG

1st Dept: 141 AD3d 464

granted
No. 12-8696.

#### Pettus *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ZAAKIR LEE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 230 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of October, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46244

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JOHN IRVIN ODLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: February 12, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Steven J. Hippler, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years with a minimum 

period of confinement of two years for possession of a controlled 

substance, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C. Swinford, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

John Irvin Odle pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance. Idaho Code § 37-

2732(c). The district court sentenced Odle to a unified term of seven years with two years 

determinate. Odle appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an 

excessive sentence and declining to retain jurisdiction or place him on probation.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Odle’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
NO. 12-15-00261-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF

R.B. AND B.B.,

CHILDREN

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 3RD

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. After reviewing the motion, the 

Court is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is 

granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).

Opinion delivered November 30, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 30, 2015

NO. 12-15-00261-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.B. AND B.B., CHILDREN

Appeal from the 3rd District Court 

of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2014C-1210)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
# Director addresses Energy workforce

/ Published Aug. 20, 2019

DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell K. Williams praised the Energy workforce during a town hall event at the McNamara Headquarters Complex at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Aug. 12. 

As he reviewed DLA Energy’s accomplishments and missions, Williams thanked the Energy workforce and acknowledged all that DLA Energy does to contribute to the agency’s number one priority, Warfighter First. He cited DLA Energy’s contributions to the nation’s strategic efforts including propelling rockets in to space, procuring the 90 million barrels of bulk petroleum valued at $7.3 billion annually and managing the fuel infrastructure Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization program. 

“I have been here for two years and the longer I am, the greater my appreciation for this phenomenal team,” Williams said. “I can’t think of another organization with a broader impact not only on DLA but also on the Department of Defense.” 

Six DLA Energy personnel were acknowledged with the Director’s “Ya Done Good!” awards. Williams introduced these awards when he took command in June 2016 in order to recognize individuals who have performed their jobs in an outstanding fashion.  

Senior Procurement Process Support Analyst Donna Black was recognized for her efforts in supporting the Rocky Mountain West Bulk program, valued at nearly $2 billion. She reduced the processing time by 50% to ensure the acquisition lead time stayed on schedule.

Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization Analyst Patricia Beyer was recognized for leading an SRM tiger team to streamline and improve the current service order cradle-to-grave process timeline for reporting deficiencies from 30 days to 7 days. 

Supplier Operations Contract Specialist Shane Banks was recognized for his efforts in the Bulk Petroleum Supply Chain Services contracting business unit. Banks successfully awarded a $227.7 million high-priority Contractor Owned, Contractor Operated Storage Services contract for 1,052,000 barrels of aviation fuel and military grade JP-5 in the San Francisco Bay, California, area.  

Quality Assurance Specialist Mark Mizrahi was recognized for improving a pre-award survey form for the benefit of all DLA military support commands. His efforts represent a DoD-level improvement in acquisition and assists the pre-award survey process. 

Customer Account Specialist Phillip Ray Adams was recognized for managing DLA Energy’s fuel intermediary program that provides time-sensitive fuel support for foreign and commercial aircraft that do not have existing fuel agreements. He coordinated case-by-case fuel support approvals for over 200 missions in 2019 with $1.1 million in sales. 

DLA Energy Middle East Navy Lt. Jonathan Gazaille was recognized for leading 11 civilians and managing the strategic bulk petroleum inventories and international agreements for 14 countries supporting Operations FREEDOM SENTINEL and INHERENT RESOLVE. 

“Thank you for what you do every day,” Williams said.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Argentina (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Argentina (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr  | May   | Jun | Jul  | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | ----- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | W    | W     | W   | W    | W   |     |     |     |    
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |      | 11.06 |     |      |     |     |     |     |    
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | 5.59 | 5.75  | W   | 5.91 |     |     |     |     |    
|2024                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | W    | 5.16  |     |      |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Millipore Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, Martin D. Madaus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Kathleen B. Allen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ MARTIN D. MADAUS *                    
|Martin D. Madaus                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer     
|November 9, 2006                          
|                                          
|/s/ KATHLEEN B. ALLEN *                   
|Kathleen B. Allen                         
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 9, 2006                          



---

|* | - A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Millipore Corporation and will be retained by Millipore Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 12-8268.

#### Loyd *v.*Virginia et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Dear Mr. Justen:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−4788). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, 

lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the 

maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 1/4/16. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267–4549.

Sincerely,

/S/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
**Exhibit
      10(b)**







**AMENDMENT
      TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**




**THIS
      AMENDMENT** (this
“Amendment”), effective as of May 8, 2006, by and between ALLTEL Corporation, a
      Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), and Scott T. Ford (“Executive”),
      amends that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2003, by and
      between the Corporation and Executive (the “Agreement”).




In
      consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and
      other
      good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
      acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows:




1.  Section
      7.3(C) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the final sentence of
      the
      introductory paragraph of Section 7.3(C) and replacing it in its entirety with
      the following:




“Whether
      an act or failure to act by the Executive constitutes “Cause” shall be
      determined subject to the following requirements.”




2.  As
      amended hereby, the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and
      effect.




**IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF** ,
      the
      parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above
      written.











**ALLTEL
              CORPORATION**By:
              /s/ Richard N. Massey**EXECUTIVE**:/s/
              Scott T. FordScott T.
              Ford