alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eliexer Reyes, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 289]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J. at plea; Robert Stolz, J. at re-plea and sentencing), rendered December 18, 2014, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is *600granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Gesmer, JJ.
Exhibit 10.2


                              AMEN PROPERTIES, INC.
                         303 W. Wall Street, Suite 2300
                              Midland, Texas 79701


                                  May 19, 2006



Priority Power Management I, L.L.C.
303 West Wall Street, Suite 2300
Midland, Texas 79701

Priority Power Management Dallas, LLC
303 West Wall Street, Suite 2300
Midland, Texas 79701

Re:      Securities Purchase Agreement by and among the Partners of Priority
         Power Management, Ltd. and PPM Dallas, Ltd., as Sellers, and Amen
         Properties, Inc. and NEMA Properties, LLC, as Buyers, dated as of May
         18, 2006 (the "Agreement")

Gentlemen:

         Pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Agreement, Amen Properties, Inc. and
NEMA Properties, LLC, as Buyers under the Agreement, hereby notify you, as the
General Partners, that the Buyers have exercised their right to extend the
Closing Date under the Agreement from May 19, 2006 to May 25, 2006, subject to
the Buyers' right to further extend the Closing Date pursuant to the terms of
the Agreement. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
meanings assigned thereto in the Agreement.

         Please acknowledge your receipt of this notice and the extension of the
Closing Date set forth herein by executing this letter where indicated below and
promptly returning the same to Amen Properties, Inc.

                      Very truly yours,

                      AMEN PROPERTIES, INC.


                      By:
                         --------------------------------------------------
                      Name:
                           ------------------------------------------------
                      Title:
                            -----------------------------------------------

                      NEMA PROPERTIES, LLC


                      By:
                         --------------------------------------------------
                      Name:
                           ------------------------------------------------
                      Title:
                            -----------------------------------------------

                    [Additional Signatures on Following Page]


<PAGE>
Priority Power Management I, L.L.C.
Priority Power Management Dallas, LLC
May 19, 2006
Page 2









ACKNOWLEDGED, CONFIRMED AND AGREED as of the date set forth above:

PRIORITY POWER MANAGEMENT I, L.L.C.


By:
   --------------------------------------------------
Name:
     ------------------------------------------------
Title:
      -----------------------------------------------


PRIORITY POWER MANAGEMENT DALLAS, LLC


By:
   --------------------------------------------------
Name:
     ------------------------------------------------
Title:
      -----------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          56,566
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,544
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (154)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,453
<PP&E>                                           2,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (684)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,143
<SALES>                                         88,981
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,981
<CGS>                                           77,723
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,472)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,472)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,472)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.16)


</TABLE>
Leading	Edge	Technologies
618	South	Main	St. Winnebago,	Mn	56098 info@dronesforag.com (507)	893

- 4545

February 17 ,	2015

U. S.	Department	of	Transportation Docket	Management	System 1200	New	Jersey	Ave	S.E. Washington,	D.C.	20590

Re: Docket FAA

- 2015

- 1053 ; Third Amendment	to	Exemption	No.	11797 Request	by	Leading	Edge	Technologies	for	inclusion	of	additional	aircraft

Dear	Sir	or	Madam:

In	 this	 petition	 for amendment	 to	Exemption	No.	 11797

, Leading	Edge	Technologies seeks	 to operate	two	additional	types	o f	UASs	for	the	purposes of	aerial	data	collection,	flight	operations training,	 and	 engineering	 development .	 These	 UASs	 are: (1)	 the DJI	 Inspire and	 (2)	 the DJI
Phantom	3

. Both	aircraft	have	been	accepted	as	airworthy	under	numerous	previous	FAA	Section 333	exemptions.

Leading	 Edge	 Technologies will	 comply	 with	 all	 of	 the	 conditions	 and	 limita tions	 imposed	 in Exemption	11797, except	in	reference	to	condition/limitation	1,	which	will	include	the	vehicles
above. The	list	of	"operating	documents"	will	also	need	to	be	revised to	include	the DJI	Inspire
and	Phantom	3 User	Manual s.	These	manuals	are	submitted	with	this	Amendment	Pe t ition for your	consideration. Other	 than	 these	 revisions,	 there	will	be	no	change	in	 the	conditions	and reasons	relative	to	public	safety	that	were	the	basis	for	th e	initial	grant	of	exemption.

Because	the	requested	ame ndment	would	not	set	any	precedent	or	otherwise	raise	any	novel issue,	and	because	Leading	Edge	Technologies	seeks	 to	begin	 these	operations	without	delay, Leading	Edge	Technologies	respectfully	requests	the	FAA	to	determine	that	good	cause	exists	to dispe nse	with	publication	of	the	summary	of	this	petition	in	the	Federal	Register	and	grant	the requested	amendment	expeditiously	by	summary	means.

Respectfully	submitted,

Orlando	Saez

CEO

– Leading	Edge	Technologies
EX-10.1



 




Exhibit 10.1






May 18, 2006




Mr. Barry A. Posner

Executive Vice President and

General Counsel

BioScrip Inc.

100 Clearbrook Road

Elmsford, New York 10523




     Re: Employment Agreement



Dear Barry:




     Reference is made to the Employment Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1999, by and between MIM
Corporation (now known as BioScrip Inc.), a Delaware corporation, and yourself (as amended to date,
the “Employment Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meaning
ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement.



     This will confirm our agreement that notwithstanding (i) the expiration of the term of your
Employment Agreement on March 31, 2006 and (ii) your agreement to waive the payment of any
severance pending the negotiation of a new employment or severance agreement following the
expiration of the term of your Employment Agreement, you shall continue to have the right to
receive the termination benefits set forth in Section 5.2(b) of Employment Agreement in the event
that the Company does not enter into a new employment or severance agreement with you on or before
June 30, 2006, except that the period during which you shall be entitled to receive continuation of
your Annual Salary as set forth in Section 5(b)(ii) shall be for a period of one (1) year from June
30, 2006.



     Kindly signify your agreement to the foregoing by signing below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	BIOSCRIP INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Richard H. Friedman
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Richard H. Friedman, Exec. Chmn.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	May 18, 2006
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Barry A. Posner
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

Barry A. Posner
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David Turiel, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Banco Santander-Chile; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules *13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)*) for the company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
No. 12-364.

#### Donohue *v.*Donohue.

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Cer-tiorari denied.
159 A.3d 882

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MAHESHKUM M. PATEL (A/K/A MAHESHKUMAR PATEL, MAHESHKUM MANUBHAI PATEL, MAHESHKUMAR MANUBHAI PATEL, MAHESHKUM PATEL, MAHESH KUMAR, MANUBHAI PATEL, MAHESHKUMAR M. PATEL, M.M. PATEL, AND MAHESHKUHAR MANUBHAI-PATEL), DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 1, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
No. 09-10553.

#### Scott D. Johnson, Petitioner v. David A. Varano, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

562 U.S. 802, 131 S. Ct. 89,

178 L. Ed. 2d 3,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 7832.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
# L_2011324EN.01003701.xml

| 7.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 324/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 324/37

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 1 December 2011

on the approval of the volume of coin issuance in 2012

(ECB/2011/21)

(2011/816/EU)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 128(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Central Bank (ECB) has the exclusive right from 1 January 1999 to approve the volume of coins issued by the Member States whose currency is the euro. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Central Bank (ECB) has the exclusive right from 1 January 1999 to approve the volume of coins issued by the Member States whose currency is the euro.

| (2) | The Member States whose currency is the euro have submitted to the ECB for approval their estimates of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2012, supplemented by explanatory notes on the forecasting methodology, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Member States whose currency is the euro have submitted to the ECB for approval their estimates of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2012, supplemented by explanatory notes on the forecasting methodology,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Approval of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2012

The ECB hereby approves the volume of euro coins to be issued by the Member States whose currency is the euro in 2012 as described in the following table:

| (EUR million) |
| --- |
| | Issuance of coins intended for circulation and issuance of collector coins
  (not intended for circulation) in 2012 |
| Belgium | 196,0 |
| Germany | 668,0 |
| Estonia | 12,7 |
| Ireland | 31,2 |
| Greece | 25,4 |
| Spain | 250,0 |
| France | 310,0 |
| Italy | 128,4 |
| Cyprus | 13,1 |
| Luxembourg | 35,0 |
| Malta | 10,5 |
| Netherlands | 63,8 |
| Austria | 264,0 |
| Portugal | 28,5 |
| Slovenia | 26,0 |
| Slovakia | 32,2 |
| Finland | 60,0 |

(EUR million)

Issuance of coins intended for circulation and issuance of collector coins

(not intended for circulation) in 2012

Belgium

196,0

Germany

668,0

Estonia

12,7

Ireland

31,2

Greece

25,4

Spain

250,0

France

310,0

Italy

128,4

Cyprus

13,1

Luxembourg

35,0

Malta

10,5

Netherlands

63,8

Austria

264,0

Portugal

28,5

Slovenia

26,0

Slovakia

32,2

Finland

60,0

Article 2

Final provision

This Decision is addressed to the Member States whose currency is the euro.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 1 December 2011.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-137254, 333-122579, 333-106110 and 333-47834) pertaining to the Synplicity, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, 2000 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Director Option Plan, 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and certain December 1999Non Plan Option Agreements of Synplicity, Inc., of our reports dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Synplicity, Inc., Synplicity, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Synplicity, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

San Jose,California 

March 15, 2007
#### Com. v. Shlewiet 20

08/17/2016

269 MAL (2016)

20

. Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 213
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Nhancement Technologies Inc. and Subsidiaries

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-52709 and 333-85287) on Form S-3 of Nhancement Technologies Inc.
and Subsidiaries of our report dated December 14, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Nhancement Technologies Inc. and Subsidiaries as
of September 30, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the fiscal year ended September 30,
1999, and the nine months ended September 30, 1998, which report appears in the
September 30, 1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Nhancement Technologies Inc.
and Subsidiaries.

                                                 BDO Seidman, LLP

San Francisco, California
December 29, 1999
Exhibit
32.02




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Thomas
J. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of R.J. O’Brien Fund Management, LLC
(“RJOFM”), Managing Owner of RJO Global Trust (the “Trust”), certify that (i)
the attached annual report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) the information contained in the attached annual report on Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust.




By:
            /s/
      Thomas
      J. AndersonThomas
      J. AndersonChief
      Financial OfficerR.J.
      O’Brien Fund Management, LLCMarch
      31, 2010
---

Exhibit 32.2





MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





The undersigned, Susan E. Knight, the Chief Financial Officer of MTS Systems Corporation (the “Company”), has executed this Certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 1, 2011 (the “Report”).





The undersigned hereby certifies that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: February 3, 2011





/s/ SUSAN E. KNIGHTSusan E. KnightVice President and Chief Financial Officer
# DLA Energy bids farewell to Americas commander

/ Published June 2, 2020
HOUSTON, Texas, 
Defense Logistics Agency Energy bid farewell to DLA Energy Americas Commander Army Col. Kevin Cotman during a virtual relinquishment of command ceremony at the La Branch Federal Building, Houston, Texas, June 1. 

DLA Energy Commander Brig. Gen. Albert Miller presided over the ceremony from DLA Energy headquarters in Fort Belvoir, Virginia, via web real-time communication while employees and colleagues watched online.

“We are operating in a new ‘normal’ environment, but how you improvised and adjusted to this new normal displays the best of qualities of this organization – the ability to be flexible, adapt and execute any mission,” Cotman said. “I’ve witnessed it for two years and it’s always amazing.”

Cotman took command of DLA Energy Americas in July 2018. During his tenure, DLA Energy Americas responded to many natural disasters and an ever-changing operational tempo in a regional area that spans 10 Federal Emergency Management Agency regions, 17 major pipeline distribution systems, seven time zones and more than 400 Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine and Coast Guard installations.

In his speech, Cotman acknowledged his team’s “exceptional” Warfighter support including three hurricanes, the “bomb cyclone” flood in Nebraska, a fire that shutdown of a tank truck facility in California, several large, multiagency exercises, and the current COVID-19 environment.  

“When I took command of Americas, I was honored and humbled to assume command of this special organization with its critical mission and dedicated professionals that support our warfighters and our nation’s needs,” Cotman said. “Without a doubt, I am still humbled and honored for each day I was in command.”  

Miller presented Cotman the Defense Superior Service Medal for his accomplishments in command.

“Colonel Cotman’s superior leadership ensured the delivery of over 2.7 billion gallons of fuel annually through the execution of $3.5 billion in petroleum contracts to the entire Western Hemisphere,” the citation read. “He brilliantly managed 413 fuel locations and over 1,200 customer accounts to support the Warfighter.”

Miller acknowledged how Cotman encourage and inspired people in his remarks. 

“A master of persuasive leadership, he is always the one to calm the water and mentors his people in the direction he wants them to go,” Miller said. “I want to commend Kevin for creating a command environment where every employee had a voice. He ensured that every employee truly felt like they were an integral part of the team.”

Cotman is being assigned to the Pentagon, U.S. Army Deputy Chief Of Staff, G-8.

DLA Energy Americas Deputy Director Jason Exum assumed command until the new commander, Army Col. Raphael Heflin, reports later in June.
2016-1553.

#### NRG Power Midwest, L.P. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2015-874 and 2015-890. On appellant/cross-appellee’s motions to strike. Motions denied.
159 A.3d 882

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES L. RANDALL, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 1, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.