alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ironshore Indemnity, Inc., as Subrogee of The Related Companies, L.P., Appellant, v W&W Glass, LLC, et al., Respondents. The Related Companies, L.P., et al., Nonparty Respondents.

[58 NYS3d 10]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered May 25, 2016, dismissing the action, pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered February 11, 2016, which granted the motion of nonparty respondents (Related Companies) to quash subpoenas, intervene in this action, and dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The motion court properly permitted the intervention of the Related Companies, as they have a strong interest in this litigation, given that plaintiff purports to sue as their subrogee *(Yuppie Puppy Pet Prods., Inc. v Street Smart Realty, LLC,*77 AD3d 197, 201 [1st Dept 2010]). Plaintiff did not preserve its argument that the Related Companies’ motion was defective for failing to submit a proposed pleading, and we decline to review it *(Ronen v Cohen,*126 AD3d 487, 487 [1st Dept 2015]). Were we to review it, we would find it unavailing (see *id.,*citing *Ryder v Travelers Ins. Co.,*37 AD2d 797, 797 [4th Dept 1971]).

The motion court correctly dismissed the complaint, because plaintiff has no subrogation rights. Notwithstanding 1⁄8 cut-*512rent claims, plaintiff Ironshore did not accept the Related Companies as an additional insured, as it never made any payment in the underlying personal injury action on its behalf *(see generally Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v CNA*Ins. Cos., 99 AD2d 310, 312 [1st Dept 1984]). Neither did Ironshore pay the Related Companies’ defense costs in that action.

Plaintiffs subrogation claims for common-law indemnification, contribution, and equitable contribution are barred by Workers’ Compensation Law § 11. Plaintiff did not allege a “grave injury” under that statute, nor did it present a bill of particulars or any other pleading that could evince a “grave injury” within the meaning of the statute *(Picaso v 345 E. 73 Owners Corp.,*101 AD3d 511, 512 [1st Dept 2012]; *see Aramburu v Midtown W. B, LLC,*126 AD3d 498, 501 [1st Dept 2015]).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Richter, Andrias, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of PreAxia Health Care Payment Systems Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ron Lizee, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  September 8, 2009
By: Ron Lizee


Name: Ron Lizee


Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1476]



[[Page 3353]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,487; TA-W-33,487A; TA-W-33,487B; TA-W-33,487C; NAFTA 01649; 
NAFTA 01649A; NAFTA 01649B; NAFTA 01649C]


Medite Corporation; Corporate Office, Medford Oregon; MDF Plant, 
Medford, Oregon; Veneer Division, Rogue River, Oregon; Forestry 
Division, Medford, Oregon; and Corporate Office, Medford Oregon; MDF 
Plant, Medford Oregon; Veneer Division, Rogue River, Oregon; Forestry 
Division, Medford, Oregon; Notice of Negative Determination on 
Reconsideration

    On September 22, 1997, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The petitioner presented new 
evidence that the collection of information regarding company sales and 
imports was incomplete for the time period relevant to the 
investigation. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
September 30, 1997 (62 FR 51156).
    The Department initially denied TAA to workers of Medite 
Corporation because the ``contributed importantly'' group eligibility 
requirement of Section 222(3) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, was 
not met. The workers at the subject firm were engaged in employment 
related to the production of lumber products.
    On reconsideration, the Department requested that Medite 
Corporation provide additional customers for the various Medite 
facilities included in the petition. A survey of the major customers of 
Medite Corporation revealed that imports did not contribute importantly 
to the worker separations. All but one of the customers survey revealed 
that they are still purchasing domestic lumber products. The one 
customer that indicated some product was being produced outside the 
U.S. had declining imports during the relevant time period.

Conclusion

    After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative 
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance 
for workers and former workers of Medite Corporation in Medford and 
Rogue River, Oregon.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of December 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-1476 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
# DLA Susquehanna Child Development Center tours firehouse during National Fire Prevention Week

/ Published Oct. 30, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
From Oct. 8-10, 1871, fire ripped through urban Chicago, killing approximately 300 people and leaving thousands homeless. Forty years later, on the anniversary of what became known as the Great Chicago Fire, the Fire Marshals Association North America sponsored the first National Fire Prevention Day as a way of educating the general public about practices and procedures involving fire hazards. Today the second week of October is federally recognized as Fire Prevention Week throughout the United States and Canada.

It has become customary for most fire departments to visit public schools during Fire Prevention Week in order to acquaint children with the dangers of fire. For the Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Susquehanna Fire Department, the closest thing to a school is the on-base Child Development Center, a day care and prekindergarten facility. So, 25 pre-K students were treated to a tour of the firehouse Oct. 10.

“Yesterday we were in the classroom,” says Johnathan Olewine, inspector with the DLA Installation Management Susquehanna Fire Department. “Today it was a tour of the fire station so the children could see the fire apparatus and, since we live here, they also got to see our living quarters and where we make our food and that kind of stuff.”

As a father with children of his own, Olewine knows how difficult it can be to hold the attention of children so young, however years of experience has taught him what works and what doesn’t.

“They’re not very attentive, so we try to just cover the basics,” says Olewine. “The firehose is good because they can get their hands on it and help us put it together and spray the nozzle. I usually try to open all the compartments (on the truck) and I try to get a firefighter to dress out in full turn-out gear with  a self-contained breathing apparatus so that they understand and know what they look like and know that they’re not scary, they’re actually there to help if they are in a fire.”

In addition to the yearly pre-K tour, Olewine says the department also visits the child care facility itself along with other high-profile buildings, handing out educational information and answering questions of children and adults alike.

Tomorrow we’re going to take a firetruck and Sparky the Fire Dog over to the preschool children so that they get to see a firetruck,” he says. “I enjoy doing this – it’s great. For the next three weeks when I see these children they’re going to say, ‘Hey you! You’re the fire guy!’ So it’s real fun and it’s exciting to see that they actually remember everything you teach them, at least for a while.”

Video:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-61-003]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 28, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 22, 1998, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to be effective June 
1, 1998:

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 2700

    Koch states that it is submitting this revised tariff sheet to 
implement modifications that are in accordance with the Commission's 
Order issued April 22, 1998, 83 FERC para. 61,067, rejecting Tariff 
Sheet No. 5200 and ordering a modification to Sheet No. 2700.
    Koch states that copies of this filing have been served upon each 
party contained in the official service list as compiled by the 
Secretary in the above captioned proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14635 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
2017-0097.

#### Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Taylor.

Summit App. No. 28069, 2016-Ohio-7090.
# Matthews receives DSSM for achievements as commander, DLA Distribution Norfolk, Virginia

/ Published April 26, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Navy Capt. Andrew Matthews has been awarded the Defense Superior Service Medal for his numerous accomplishments while serving as commander, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Norfolk, Virginia, from June 2017 to April 2019. 

According to Navy RDML Kevin M. Jones, Commander, DLA Distribution, “Captain Andy Matthews provided tremendous leadership while in command at DLA Distribution Norfolk, Virginia. During this period, as throughout his career, Andy has exhibited the highest level of professionalism, leadership, and dedication to accomplishing his mission. He is an extraordinarily gifted leader and visionary change agent who is most deserving of the special recognition afforded by the Defense Superior Service Medal.”  

Matthews’ performance as commander of one of DLA Distribution's most complex and regionally diverse centers has been unconditionally superlative. Under Matthews’ leadership, workload through the materiel processing center increased by 20 percent and processing time decreased by over half—resulting in enhanced material visibility and readiness to the fleet. Matthews spearheaded a redesign of material flow at the container consolidation points greatly improving the effectiveness of inbound and outbound container support to all theaters and combatant commands. In addition, these process improvements resulted in an 80 percent decrease in containerized materiel receipt to ship processing times, surpassing all historically recorded metrics and delivering significant logistics response time reductions for all services and foreign military customers. 

Andy’s team met many short suspense requirements in support of operational deployments of marine expeditionary units.  In conjunction with deployments aboard navy amphibious ships, the units needed specialized equipment and landing force material loaded shortly before departure in order to support expeditionary missions and real-world contingency operations. His uniquely talented pier operations ensured all equipment and materiel was safely loaded aboard the ships. Regardless of timeframe and work hours, the team achieved the loads on time, every time, ensuring no operational impact to the marines’ missions in the Eastern Mediterranean, southwest Asia and North Atlantic regions.  

Andy’s team also provided critical pier-side support for ships tasked with hurricane relief operations in the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico in 2017 and North Carolina in 2018. 

The trust and credibility he has earned from the shipyard and NAVSEA leadership has enabled the development of standardized processes and initiatives that will help promote audit readiness to this industrial support mission. Matthews’ performance during his tour of duty has been superior and has set the standard for the defense logistics agency. Matthews leaves DLA Distribution Norfolk, Virginia, with a legacy of innovation, improvement and dedication to quality. His visionary and inspired leadership throughout a time of critical need clearly sets him apart from his peers.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-1


               MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Twelve Months Ended         Six Months Ended     Six Months Ended
                                              -------------------         ----------------     ----------------
                                                  June 30, 2001           June 30, 2001          June 30, 2000
                                                  -------------           -------------          -------------
<S>                                           <C>                         <C>                  <C>
EARNINGS AS DEFINED (1)
Pre-tax income (loss) .................               $ 19,097               ($36,161)               $108,263
Fixed charges .........................                 60,764                 28,685                  30,809
                                                      --------               --------                --------
  Earnings as defined .................               $ 79,861               ($ 7,476)               $139,072
                                                      ========               ========                ========

FIXED CHARGES AS DEFINED (1)
Interest expensed .....................               $ 57,668               $ 27,218                $ 29,253
Interest capitalized ..................                    666                    224                     369
Amortization of debt discounts, premium
  and expense .........................                  1,187                    627                     560
Interest implicit in rentals (2) ......                  1,243                    616                     627
                                                      --------               --------                --------
  Fixed charges as defined ............               $ 60,764               $ 28,685                $ 30,809
                                                      ========               ========                ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges ....                   1.31                                           4.51
                                                      ========                                       ========
Coverage Deficiency ...................                                      $ 36,161
                                                                             ========
</TABLE>


Notes:
-----

(1)      Earnings and fixed charges are defined and computed in accordance with
         Item 503 of Regulation S-K.

(2)      This amount is estimated to be a reasonable approximation of the
         interest portion of rentals.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan’s Foods, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of August 12, 2007, based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: September 26, 2007 /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir        Leonard R. Stein-Sapir,        Chairman of the Board and      ChiefExecutive Officer  
15
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14478]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics; Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of 
Health and Human Services announces the following advisory committee 
meeting.

    Name: National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS).
    Times and Dates: 9:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m., June 16, 1998; 8:00 a.m.-
5:00 p.m., June 17, 1998.
    Place: Conference Room 505A, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20201.
    Status: Open.
    Purpose: The meeting will focus on a variety of health data 
policy and privacy issues. Department officials will brief the 
Committee on recent activities of the HHS Data Council and the 
status of HHS activities in implementing the administrative 
simplification provisions of P.L. 104-191, the Health Insurance 
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). The Committee 
will review its current organization and work plans. In addition, 
the Committee will discuss the quality of HEDIS data, possible 
comments on the report of the President's Commission on Quality and 
Consumer Protection, recommendations for HIPAA claims attachment 
standards, and possible comments on the HIPAA Notices of Proposed 
Rulemaking for the adoption of data standards. The Committee also 
will be briefed on plans for Healthy People 2010, National Health 
Objectives for the Nation, and the results of a CPRI Terminology 
Conference. Subcommittee breakout sessions are planned. All topics 
are tentative and subject to change. Please check the NCVHS website, 
where a detailed agenda will be posted prior to the meeting.
    Contact Person For More Information: Substantive information as 
well as summaries of NCVHS meetings and a roster of committee 
members may be obtained by visiting the NCVHS website (<a href="http://
aspe.os.dhhs.gov/ncvhs">http://
aspe.os.dhhs.gov/ncvhs</a>) or by calling James Scanlon, NCVHS Executive 
Staff Director, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and 
Evaluation, DHHS, Room 440-D. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence 
Avenue S.W., Washington, D.C. 20201, telephone (202) 690-7100, or 
Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive Secretary, NCVHS, NCHS, CDC, Room 
1100, Presidential Building, 6525 Belcrest Road, Hyattsville, 
Maryland 20782, telephone 301/436-7050.

    Note: In the interest of security, the Department has instituted 
stringent procedures for entrance to the Hubert H. Humphrey Building 
by non-government employees. Thus, individuals without a government 
identification card may need to have the guard call for an escort to 
the meeting room.

    Dated: May 26, 1998.
James Scanlon,
Director, Division of Data Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-14478 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-04-M