alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-1529V

UNPUBLISHED

ANTHONY SANDERS,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: January 21, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Michael Andrew London, Douglas & London, P.C., New York, NY, for petitioner.

Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On October 3, 2018, Anthony Sanders filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffers from Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) 

as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine that was administered on October 20, 2015. 

Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of 

Special Masters.

On November 18, 2019, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent concedes that Petitioner suffered an onset of 

 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

GBS between three and forty-two days after vaccination with at least six months of 

residual symptoms Id. at 2-3. Respondent further agrees that Petitioner suffered the 

nadir of weakness between 12 hours and 28 days following the onset of symptoms; that 

following the nadir, Petitioner stabilized or improved without significant relapse; and that 

no likely alternative diagnosis could explain Petitioner’s symptoms. Id. at 2-4

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
#### Crispino, Matter of, v Chun

2d Dept: 142 AD3d 1169

denied*
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1812

To amend the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1973, to permit a Senator

to direct that excess funds allocated to the Senator’s personal office

for a fiscal year be returned to the United States Treasury to reduce

the public debt.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 31 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Mr. KEMPTHORNE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

A BILL

To amend the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1973, to

permit a Senator to direct that excess funds allocated

to the Senator’s personal office for a fiscal year be

returned to the United States Treasury to reduce the

public debt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senate Office Savings

5 Act’’ (SOS Act).
2

S 1812 IS

1 SEC. 2. USE OF EXCESS SENATORS’ OFFICE FUNDS TO RE2 DUCE THE PUBLIC DEBT.

3 (a) DIRECTION BY A SENATOR TO RETURN EXCESS

4 FUNDS TO THE TREASURY.—Section 506 of the Supple5 mental Appropriations Act 1973 (2 U.S.C. 58) is amended

6 by adding at the end the following new subsection:

7 ‘‘(k) Not later than 90 days after the close of a fiscal

8 year, a Senator may direct that all or any part of the

9 amount of funds that were appropriated to the Senate for

10 that fiscal year and allocated to the Senator’s personal of11 fice under this section and that remain unexpended and

12 unobligated shall be paid into the sinking fund for retiring

13 and canceling bonds and notes described in section 3112

14 of title 31, United States Code.’’.

15 (b) REDUCTION OF PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT.—Section

16 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by

17 striking the period at the end and inserting ‘‘, less the

18 aggregate amount of funds paid into the fund described

19 in section 3112 at the direction of Senators pursuant to

20 subsection (k) of section 506 of the Supplemental Appro21 priations Act, 1973 (2 U.S.C. 58(k)), since the date of

22 enactment of that subsection.’’.

Æ
#### In the Matter of Douglas Knipple, Appellant, v Mildred Jackson, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 860]

— Peters, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Albany County (Tobin, J), entered July 25, 2002, which, inter alia, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 4, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition.

*1239In December 2001, petitioner, pro se, filed a petition* seeking relief, including the recovery of counsel fees, which had been awarded to respondent by a September 1998 order of Family Court; that order was affirmed on appeal *(Matter of Flanigan v Knipple,*266 AD2d 752 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 759 [2000]). Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition, grounded upon petitioner’s failure to state a cause of action, was granted and Family Court affirmed. This appeal ensued.

Petitioner contends that errors of law were made in prior proceedings pertaining to the applicability of federal and state tax exemption statutes and that had he been properly permitted to claim the parties’ child as a dependent exemption on his federal and state income tax returns, there would have been no basis for the prior order. Recognizing the limited power accorded to the Support Magistrate pursuant to Family Ct Act § 439 and Family Court’s role upon its review of objections to an order issued by the Support Magistrate *(see*Family Ct Act § 439 [e]), we find no reason to disturb the determination rendered.

Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including the claim of bias by the Support Magistrate, have been reviewed and rejected as meritless *(see Matter of Greenier v Breason,*251 AD2d 703, 704 [1998]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

*

 An amended petition was filed April 25, 2002.
498 P.2d 511

#### STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Roger Dale CASEY, Appellant.

No. 1 CA-CR 407.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

June 29, 1972.

*438Gary K. Nelson, Atty. Gen., by John Dickinson, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Roger Dale Casey, in pro. per.

STEVENS, Presiding Judge.

Roger Dale Casey, herein referred to as the defendant, was charged in a criminal complaint with two counts. Count 1 alleged an assault with a deadly weapon, to wit, a knife, upon a named female person, A.R.S. § 13-249 being cited. As charged, this offense carries a permissible sentence of five years to life. Count 2 alleged an open end burglary, A.R.S. §§ 13-301 and 13-302 being cited. The reporter’s transcript of the preliminary hearing establishes both offenses, the burglary being a nighttime burglary which carries a maximum of 15 years. The defendant was bound over for trial on both counts. The same offenses were alleged in a 2-count information filed in the Superior Court.

After initial pleas of not guilty the defendant consented to the filing of an amended information charging the offense of assault with a deadly weapon, A.R.S. § 13-249, subsec. A for which the maximum sentence is 10 years.

The defendant plead guilty to the amended information and was sentenced to not less than 9 and not more than 10 years in the Arizona State Prison, to commence as of the date of his arrest.

He filed a notice of appeal, the record was furnished to him, and the Public Defender was appointed to defend him. The Public Defender filed an ANDERS brief and was granted leave to withdraw. The defendant was granted additional time within which to state reasons for reversal and has failed to take advantage of this opportunity. The State’s brief was served and filed. No reply brief was filed. The Clerk gave notice that the case “ * * * is placed on the calendar of cases for consideration without argument * * Thereafter the Judges conferred.

The reporter’s transcript of the prelim- ' inary hearing, the reporter’s transcript of the proceedings in the Superior Court and" the entire record have been examined for fundamental error pursuant to A.R.S. § 13— 1715. We find no error. We find that each and every right of the defendant has. been fully protected. The defendant was. fully and adequately represented by counsel at all stages of the proceedings.

Affirmed.

CASE and DONOFRIO, JJ-, concur.
# DLA R&D Industry Collider Day fuses industry, ingenuity

/ Published Nov. 30, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Research and Development held its first virtual Industry Collider Day Nov. 18, embracing unique solutions to build important partnerships within the limitations of the ongoing pandemic.

“While planning for our annual industry day, which is usually held in-person at DLA Headquarters, our chief information officer, Dr. George Duchak, challenged us to make it epic,” said Martina Johnson, DLA R&D operations integrator. “We embraced that challenge and partnered with innovative vendors to make it happen.” 

More than 500 attendees from DLA, the Defense Department, other government organizations, industry and academia took advantage of the virtual event to learn about the latest in innovative technologies and DLA initiatives that address national and global challenges. The virtual format allowed for live presentations, informative videos, interactive breakout rooms and awards presentations.

Duchak opened the event by outlining DLA’s goal to be a “global, agile and innovative organization” that faces challenges like supply chain security, maintains a resilient cyber environment and balances organizational efficiency with warfighter readiness.

During a keynote address, DLA Director Navy Vice Adm. Michelle Skubic shared examples of R&D’s success with power sources and ensuring domestically sourced materials. She also described the program’s ability to quickly provide sterilization for N95 masks in response to needs of front-line workers in the COVID-19 response. Skubic emphasized that DLA’s success is reliant on partnerships with academia, the military services and industry.

David Koch, director of DLA R&D, described the agency’s R&D programs, partnerships and the people involved, as well as how they will address DLA’s challenges.

Attendees also heard an update on DLA modernization efforts from DLA Program Executive Officer Adarryl Roberts and received information on how to do business with DLA and opportunities with R&D via the broad agency announcement process.

Program managers for each of DLA’s 13 R&D programs hosted break-out sessions in chat rooms and answered attendees’ questions.

The day concluded with the presentation of 15 Small Business Innovation Research Phase 1 Awards to small businesses from across the U.S. The awards were based on proposals submitted by over 140 candidates and oral presentations to technical evaluation teams. Winners addressed areas including pharmaceutical supply chain vulnerability and novel approaches for detection of and protection from emerging viral pandemics.

“The goal of Industry Collider Day was to create ‘collisions’ between R&D and participants to identify opportunities to collaborate on solutions from across a variety of technical areas,” Koch said. “Thanks to the support of our senior leaders and valued partners, numerous collisions were made, which ultimately is the fusion of industry with the ingenuity of DLA in supporting the warfighter.”

For more information about the event or DLA R&D, contact Logistics.Research@dla.mil.
# L_2010288EN.01001601.xml

| 5.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 288/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 288/16

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 993/2010

of 4 November 2010

granting no export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 619/2008

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 164(2), in conjunction with Article 4, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 2 November 2010. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 2 November 2010.

| (3) | The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 2 November 2010, no export refund shall be granted for the product and destinations referred to in point (c) of Article 1 and in Article 2 respectively of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 5 November 2010.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 November 2010.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 28.6.2008, p. 20.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 325, 11.12.2007, p. 69.

3

---
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Qwest on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: August 6, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/RICHARD C. NOTEBAERTRichard C. Notebaert
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/OREN G. SHAFFEROren G. Shaffer
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer                

---



QuickLinks
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 07, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 07, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0140. MARGO ELIZABETH BYRNE v. ROBERT BYRNE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

20CV00358
# DLA Sexual Assault Prevention and Response office promotes National Denim Day

/ Published April 23, 2019
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
On April 24, millions will don denim to support survivors of sexual assault and raise awareness about all forms of sexual violence. The Defense Logistics Agency SAPR office encourages agency civilians to wear their jeans for a purpose.

The Denim Day campaign was originally triggered after a ruling by the Italian Supreme Court where a rape conviction was overturned because the justices felt that since the victim was wearing tight jeans she must have helped her rapist remove her jeans, thereby implying consent. The following day, the women in the Italian Parliament came to work wearing jeans in solidarity with the victim. The Italian Supreme Court has since overturned their findings, and there is no longer a "denim" defense to the charge of rape.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hubert Felder, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 407]

*486Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Seth L. Marvin, J.), rendered February 9, 2015, as amended February 13, 2015, convicting him, after a nonjury trial, of attempted forcible touching, sexual abuse in the third degree, and two counts of harassment in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of three months, unanimously modified, on the facts, to the extent of vacating the harassment conviction with respect to complainant A.R., and dismissing that count of the information, and otherwise affirmed.

Except as indicated, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility and identification. However, in performing elements-based review regarding the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]), we find that complainant A.R.’s testimony that defendant apparently mistook her for someone else, and “grazed” her arm, from her mid-shoulder to her hand, after which she walked away, did not support an inference that defendant intended to harass, annoy or alarm her *(see*Penal Law § 240.26 [1]; *People v Bracey,*41 NY2d 296, 301 [1977]).

To the extent the record permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). A CPL 710.40 (4) motion to reopen the *Wade*hearing based on trial testimony would have been unavailing, because this testimony would not have materially affected the suppression determination *(see People v Clark,*88 NY2d 552, 555 [1996]), and because the alleged new facts would have been within defendant’s own knowledge and thus could not have satisfied the requirement of reasonable diligence (see *People v Morales,*281 AD2d 182 [1st Dept 2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 922 [2001]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Gische and Webber, JJ.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                  MOBILE AMERICA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  UNAUDITED COMPUTATIONS OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
  QUARTERS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND 1994, NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                 1995 AND 1994

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Quarters Ended                Nine Months Ended
                                                      September 30,                   September 30,      
                                              -----------------------------    --------------------------

                                                   1995            1994            1995          1994    
                                              ------------     ------------    ------------  ------------
<S>                                           <C>              <C>             <C>           <C>
Net Income                                    $  1,529,009     $    104,718    $  4,446,971  $  3,329,057
                                              ============     ============    ============  ============



Common shares outstanding                        6,260,040        6,264,040       6,260,040     6,264,040

Effect of weighting treasury
  stock acquired                                   -               -                -            -

Common and common equivalent
  shares used in computing earnings
  per share                                                                                             
                                             ------------     ------------    ------------  ------------
                                                6,260,040        6,264,040       6,260,040     6,264,040
                                             ============     ============    ============  ============





Earnings per share                           $        .24     $        .02    $        .71  $        .53
                                             ============     ============    ============  ============
</TABLE>
#### Laura Barone, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Vincent Barone, Deceased, Appellant, v Elizabeth Firehouse, LLC, et al., Respondents.

[52 NYS3d 225]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered April 19, 2016, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the wrongful death causes of action as against them, unanimously reversed, on the facts and the law, without costs, and the motions denied.

Defendants failed to establish their prima facie case. Defendants merely pointed out perceived gaps in plaintiff’s case *(see Dabbagh v Newmark Knight Frank Global Mgt. Servs., LLC,*99 AD3d 448, 450 [1st Dept 2012]; *Salgado v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*105 AD3d 417 [1st Dept 2013]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.