alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Saunders, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 229]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered July 9, 2013, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, assault in the second degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see *People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see *People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The County Court did not err in precluding a recording of a *1032phone call made by a police sergeant at the crime scene, as it did not meet the criteria to be admissible as a present sense impression. It was not a spontaneous description of events made substantially contemporaneously with the observations (see *People v Jones,*28 NY3d 1037, 1039 [2016]; *People v Brown,*80 NY2d 729, 734 [1993]; *People v Ross,*237 AD2d 467 [1997]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Balkin, J.P., Cohen, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
#### Com. v. Dupriest

03/30/2016

664 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 481
# DLA Distribution Donald P. Brown award for operational cost effectiveness is awarded to Steven Pawlicki

/ Published May 20, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Steven Pawlicki, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Anniston, Alabama, equipment specialist, received the DLA Distribution Donald P. Brown award for operational cost effectiveness. Pawlicki’s straightforward thinking and aggressiveness led him to develop a program to monitor daily balances of millions of dollars’ worth of packing supplies and material stored in the organization’s consolidated supply room. These essential stored supplies are always crucial to have readily available to correctly ship critical replacement parts and weapons globally to support the warfighter mission.

The self-developed program by Pawlicki is utilized as a comparative tool of supplies on-hand with the actual balances reflected in the Distribution Standard System. The program also provides the means to track maximum quantities that can be stored for assigned stock numbers in each allocated designated location. This readily available information provides guidance with reordering and maintaining reorder points for over 200 individual stocked items. The ability to correctly monitor reorder points saves the organizations millions of dollars annually by reducing the costs associated with last minute supply requests and increases the speed by which material can reach the warfighter in the field.

Pawlicki established a local historical program that tracks both material release orders along with dates associated with packaging supply requests to the item managers and the date of actual arrival. This historical database provides an average procurement time as to when DDAA can expect delivery of requested critical material.

Both databases provide imperative statistics to make critical decisions that have a long-term effect on the support that is provided to the warfighter by DDAA.
#### State v. Kaawa

CAAP-12-0000670

02/25/2014

Affirmed
exv4w2



 








Exhibit 4.2









 





	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
	 
	 	 	Chartered Accountants
	 
	 	 	PO Box 82
	 
	 	 	Royal Trust Tower, Suite 3000
	 
	 	 	Toronto Dominion Centre
	 
	 	 	Toronto, Ontario
	 
	 	 	Canada M5K 1G8
	 
	 	 	Telephone +1 416 863 1133
	 
	 	 	Facsimile +1 416 365 8215






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We hereby consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the Registration
Statement on Form F-8 (File No. 333-129218) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, as amended on December 15, 2005, January 20,
2006, February 28, 2006 and on or about
May 29, 2006, to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 28, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the financial statement
schedule of Inco Limited as at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2005 and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as at December 31, 2005 which appears on page 143 of Inco Limited’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




Chartered Accountants




Toronto, Ontario

May 29, 2006




PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the other
member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and
independent legal entity.
#### People v Guardiola

1st Dept: 143 AD3d 519

denied*
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to France (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to France (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 4.38  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.23   | 6.74   | 13.95  | 7.05   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Junior G. Fils-Aime, Appellant, v Paolo C. Colombo, Defendant, and Jasvir Singh et al., Respondents.

[58 NYS3d 131]—

*494In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silber, J.), dated August 25, 2016, which granted the separate motions of the defendant Jasvir Singh and the defendants Sandra P. Roye and Elrac, LLC, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, and the separate motions of the defendant Jasvir Singh and the defendants Sandra P. Roye and Elrac, LLC, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them are denied.

In support of their separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them, the defendant Jasvir Singh and the defendants Sandra P. Roye and Elrac, LLC (hereinafter collectively the defendants), failed to meet their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car*Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants’ submissions failed to eliminate triable issues of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury under the 90/180-day category of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Che Hong Kim v Kossoff,*90 AD3d 969 [2011]; *Rouach v Betts,*71 AD3d 977 [2010]). Since the defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden, it is unnecessary to determine whether the papers submitted by the plaintiff in opposition were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see *Che Hong Kim v Kossoff,*90 AD3d at 969).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.

Balkin, J.P., Miller, Duffy, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
# C_2010099EN.01000301.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5820 — HPS/DKPS/SC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 99/02

On 9 April 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5820. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5820. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Order entered March 11, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00424-CR

JOHNELLE RENEE HALL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 10

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA17-13792-L

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 5, 2019 third motion for extension of time to file 

his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s tendered brief filed as of the date of 

this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### Nelson Sanchez, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 280]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered May 4, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion to set aside the jury’s verdict as against the weight of the evidence and direct that a new trial be held on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, and the motion denied.

In this action for personal injuries, plaintiff alleges that he fell while descending a covered and unlit exterior subway staircase owned by defendant. The jury found that defendant was negligent in its maintenance of the lighting on the staircase, that defendant’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff’s injuries, and that plaintiff was not negligent.

The trial court erred in setting aside as against the weight of the evidence the jury’s finding that plaintiff was not negligent *(see Jones v New York-Presbyterian Hosp.,*150 AD3d 412 [1st Dept 2017]; *Soler v Jersey Boring & Drilling Co., Inc.,*143 AD3d 421 [1st Dept 2016]; *see also*CPLR 4404 [a]). Although plaintiff conceded that he descended an unlighted staircase, the jury could reasonably have concluded that his decision to *565do so was not negligent, as plaintiff testified that he used the same staircase every night while coming home from work, and had in fact done so without incident on previous evenings when the lights were inoperative.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar   | Apr | May   | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep  | Oct | Nov | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | -----
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     | 27.61 |     | 22.12 |     |     |     | 7.62 |     |     | 11.91
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Yemen (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Yemen (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 5,977  | 2,979  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2016-1659.

#### In re Resignation of Feighan.

It is ordered by this court, sua sponte, that Joseph English Feighan III, Attorney Registration No. 0066256, last known business address in Lakewood, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of December 2, 2016, to wit, failure to surrender his attorney-registration card, failure to surrender his certificate of admission, and failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before January 3, 2017.
#### In the Matter of Anthony Carty, Petitioner, v Martin H. Brownstein, Respondent.

[630 NYS2d 930]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the production of the minutes of the proceedings during jury selection on an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 29, 1992.

Motion by the respondent to dismiss the proceeding.

Upon the petition and the papers filed in support of the proceeding and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motion, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted without prejudice to the petitioner’s making a motion to enlarge the judgment roll to include the minutes of the proceedings during jury selection; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LARRY PERKINS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3306

[ February 1, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Paul L. Backman

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06

- 007365 CF10A

.

Larry Perkins, Moore Haven, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, D AMOORGIAN and C IKLIN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code





Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Joseph Esposito, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the
undersigned's knowledge:

     The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31,
     2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 15, 2004                                   Joseph Esposito
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Joseph Esposito,
                                                  President and Chief Executive
                                                  Officer