alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DSCC celebrates 100-year anniversary of women’s right to vote

/ Published July 29, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Federal Community Office of Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Federal Women’s Program observes Women’s Equality Day. This year’s theme is “Women’s Right to Vote.” August 26 marks the anniversary of the Women’s Suffrage Movement’s greatest victory – women achieving full voting rights following the ratification of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution 100 years ago.

The women’s suffragist movement was successful because a group of women – and men – came together to promote change and challenged the nation to live up to its founding principles. They demanded that rules written by men, for men, be reformed. Changing the Constitution was a lengthy and difficult struggle.  Activists lectured, wrote, marched, lobbied and protested in an effort to achieve full equality with men.

In 1848, the first women’s rights convention was held in Seneca Falls, New York, led by Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton.

By March of 1920, 35 states had approved the amendment, one state shy of the two-thirds needed to pass.  The vote came down to Tennessee.  Tennessee was divided 48–48 on the bill.  The tie was broken by representative Harry Burn, the youngest member of the House, who had been wearing a red anti-suffrage rose.  He changed his vote after he received a letter from his mother urging him to “be a good boy” and vote for women’s rights.  On August 26, 1920, Tennessee became the 36th state to vote “yay,” ratifying the 19th Amendment into law. 

In 1971, Congress passed legislation to officially recognize August 26 of each year as Women’s Equality Day.  As we celebrate Women’s Equality Day together, let us remember, the legacy of brave women who served, and continue to serve, our nation and the Department of Defense, further inspiring us to strive for liberty and equality for all Americans. 

For additional DEOMI products and Facts of the Day please visit their website at: www.deomi.org  If you would like more information or are interested in joining the EEO Federal Women’s Program committee please contact the Chair, Deonna Coleman by email: Deonna.Coleman@dla.mil or Coordinator, Jessica Bradhurst Jessica.Bradhurst@dla.mil.
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1667 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1667
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                                 An Act


 
 To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 
                                  1993

                             by six months.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

    Section 3(a) of the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 1993 
(Public Law 103-125) is amended by striking ``January 1'' and inserting 
in lieu thereof ``July 1''.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Price of Port Huron, MI Liquefied Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Price of Port Huron, MI Liquefied Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | --     | 9.48   | 10.16  | 9.66   | --     | --     | --     | --    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EX-34 (c)

(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers Center
300 Madison Avenue
New York NY 10017
Telephone (646) 471 3000
Facsimile (813) 286 6000

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholder of Chase Home Finance LLC:


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria, that Chase Home Finance LLC (the "Company") complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
"Reporting Period"), for asset-backed securities transactions backed by prime
residential mortgages serviced on the Real Estate ("RE") servicing system where
the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the Reporting Period
(the "Platform"), excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(i),
1122(d)(4)(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2006 for the asset-backed securities transactions backed by prime
residential mortgages serviced on the real estate ("RE") servicing system where
the related asset-backed securities were outstanding during the Reporting Period
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 26, 2007
# Lead-acid a positive for the environment

/ Published Nov. 2, 2020
Richmond, Va., 
Batteries aren’t exactly great for the environment, but recycling is. Employees from Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Richmond, DLA Installation Management Richmond and DLA Disposition Services Richmond, Virginia turned a negative into a positive Oct. 28 when they decided to return over 1,500 lead-acid batteries back to the manufacturer.

Jimmy Parrish, chief of the Environmental Management Division, DLA Installation Management Richmond, said because of their lead-acid content, 33 pallets of batteries were stored in DLA Distribution’s hazardous warehouse on Defense Supply Center Richmond. They were for potential future use in High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled vehicles and Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles.

“They are very similar to normal car batteries,” said Parrish. “All of the batteries are unused; however, they are very close to approaching their shelf life expiration, which means the warfighter cannot use them after that date.”

Josh Molnar, safety and occupational health specialist contractor for DLA Distribution, and Environmental Protection Specialists Charles Willard, DLA Distribution Richmond, and Terrence Taylor, DLA Installation Management Richmond, are credited with the idea of returning the batteries to the manufacturer, vice normal disposal.

East Penn Manufacturing, the original manufacturer of the batteries, will return them to their 520-acre single-site battery manufacturing complex in Berks County, Pennsylvania. The lead and acid will then be recycled and used in new batteries.

“By recycling the batteries, ultimate disposal is avoided, and the manufacturing of new parts [the lead] is minimized, which benefits the environment big time.” Taylor said.

“Disposal costs exceed $13,000, so recycling the batteries in lieu of ultimate disposal not only protects the environment – it’s also a positive on cost-saving measures.” Willard said.

The process of returning items to the manufacturer has been used before, and in this case, being able to beat the shelf life was critical, as the batteries’ internal contents are still usable.

Parrish said regarding inventory, matching available supplies to demand will always be a challenge.

“On one end of the spectrum, you would like to minimize costs by avoiding excessive purchases,” he said. “However, what is most important is that the part [battery] is there when the warfighter needs it.”

As with any two sides, it’s a balancing act.
#### Com. v. Klinger 26

02/17/2016

688 MAL (2015)

26

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 458
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE MAUREEN A. HOWARD

______________________ 

2014-1137

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 

11/209,266.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

ROBERT R. AXENFELD, O’Kelly Ernst & Bielli, LLC, of 

Wilmington, Delaware, argued for appellant. 

MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, 

Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were 

NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and FRANCES M. LYNCH, 

Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was JEREMIAH HELM, 

Associate Solicitor.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 

 PER CURIAM (TARANTO, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
December 21 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building

– ground floor

Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Reference: FAA Exemption No. 10959, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0656

The Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) is the world leader in recreational aviation. With an international membership of more than 190,000 people in over 100 nations, EAA brings together pilots, aircraft builders, owners, and aviation enthusiasts who are dedicated to sharing the Spirit of Aviation by promoting the continued growth of aviation, the preservation of its history and a commitment to its future.

The conditions and rea sons regarding public interest and safety, presented in the original petition dated June 17, 2011 and recognized as Exemption No. 10959, remain unchanged. EAA requests FAA Exemption No. 10959 be renewed for a 2

- year period.

For questions concerning this renewal, please contact the undersigned at 920

- 426

- 6103.

Respectfully,

Mackenzie Dickson Government Advocacy Specialist

P.O. Box 3086 Oshkosh, WI 54903

- 3086 | Tel 920.426.4800 | Fax 920.426.6560 | www.EAA.org
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Norway (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Norway (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug   | Sep   | Oct   | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | ---
|2013                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 2,709 | 2,918 |       |     |    
|2015                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |       |       | 5,992 |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1213595
<SECURITIES>                                    393853
<RECEIVABLES>                                    72694
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    2030337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4582861
<PP&E>                                         5949890
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1985726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9577746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1287429
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        825649
<OTHER-SE>                                     3683603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9577746
<SALES>                                        7953746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7953746
<CGS>                                          6102948
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7815860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 58895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               75822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  78991
<INCOME-TAX>                                     77822
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of
Microvision, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)     the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:May 7, 2009 | By: /s/ Alexander Y. Tokman   Alexander Y. Tokman 
 Chief Executive Officer
|---------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit 31-16
**FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATION**
I, David E. Meador, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 of MichiganConsolidated Gas Company; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b.  (Intentionally omitted)  c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR   Date: May 10, 2005     David E. Meador    Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer of    Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
# Sun Tzu, woodwind quintets and a Texas high school band

/ Published May 23, 2019
Alvarado, Texas, 
The Texas State Agency for Surplus Property acquires a variety of property from DLA Disposition Services and recently passed the 1,000 item mark - for items not often associated with the military.

They were musical instruments, high quality instruments that are used by all the military service bands that are turned into DLA Disposition Services when time and wear dictates their replacement.   DLA of course looks for new eligible owners.

While most people think about military equipment, musical instruments may not be on the top of the list.

But they are not new to military units.

In his book “The Art of War,” Sun Tzu wrote of the importance of drums and gongs to relay orders on the battle field. “The Art of War” is still on reading list for members of the military. Sun Tzu wrote his thoughts down in the 5th century BC.

High tech has replaced drums and gongs as a means of communication on the battle field, but the role of the musical instrument and the military musician has evolved.

The U.S. Army Band Woodwind Quintet is one of the Army’s premiere chamber ensembles. The quintet is frequently called upon in support of high-level military and civilian events at the White House, the U.S. Capitol, the Pentagon, and other locations around Washington, DC.

Along with other military bands they also perform at colleges and universities, as well as elementary and secondary schools.  The bands are said to have established themselves as a strong proponents of educational outreach.

But educational outreach does not end with performances or band members serving as guest teachers for young musicians.

Some of the instruments they once used are returning to class rooms thanks to DLA Disposition Services.

Patrick Dietz is the band director at the high school in Alvarado, Texas. His music program recently acquired 31 instruments through the program.

“We have a lot of smart kids and these horns have really allowed them to experience success that an entry level instrument would not allow for them to have,” Dietz said.  He says he has seen them grow as student musicians.