alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 2, 2002

Before

Hon. HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., Circuit Judge

Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

No. 01-1952

IN RE: ABBOTT LABORATORIES

DERIVATIVE SHAREHOLDER

LITIGATION

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District

of Illinois, Eastern Division

No. 99-C-7246

James B. Moran, 

Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion of this court issued on June 6, 2002, is hereby withdrawn. A revised opinion

will be issued at a later date.
*January 24, 2018*

2018-Ohio-242.]

2018-0037.

#### Clean Energy Future, L.L.C. v. Clean Energy Future-Lordstown, L.L.C.

Trumbull App. No. 2017-T-0110, 2017-0hio-9350. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Andrew C. Phelan. Motion granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days.
Exhibit 15.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the inclusion in this annual
report on Form 20-F of (i) our report dated May 25, 2016 relating to the statements of financial position of Royal Standards Minerals
Inc. as of January 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders' deficiency
and cash flows for the years then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information and
(ii) our report dated May 22, 2015 relating to the consolidated statements of financial position of Royal Standards Minerals Inc.
as of January 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, changes in
shareholders' deficiency and cash flows for the years then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory
information.



Signed:







Mississauga, Ontario



June 14, 2016
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY

Air Quality Program

January 8, 2008

TO: Jay J. Manning, Director

Department of Ecology

FROM: Sarah Rees, Section Manager

Program Develpoment Section

THROUGH: Stu Clark, Program Manager

Air Quality Program

SUBJECT: State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal; Puget Sound 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance 

Plan (the Plan)

I am requesting your approval to submit the Plan to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for 

approval as a revision to the Washington SIP. A briefing paper about the Plan is attached for your 

information along with a transmittal letter and adoption order for your signature. We would be happy to 

supply a copy of the Plan upon request.

Please return the signed documents to the Air Quality Program for assembly of the submittal package 

for EPA. If you have further questions about this submittal request, please contact Doug Schneider at 

407-6874. Thank you. 

Attachments
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of J. I. T. and J. A. T. , children

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00988

- CV

Trial court case number: 2011

- 53185

Trial court: 311th District Court

To assist the Court in analyzing the issues raised in this appeal and to allow fuller use of the oral argument process, the parties are ORDERED to provide the following

additional information to the Court no later than Tuesday, May 29 , 2018 at 5:00 p.m. T o the extent a letter brief is fully responsive , that format is permissible. Otherwise, please provide copies of documents responsive to this request.

The Department of Family and Protective Services is ordered to inform the C ourt whether the Department h as any written policies that are publicly available that discuss,

address or mention any of the following issues : (1) whether family reunification as a permanency goal has primacy over other permanency options, (2) whether parents must

be informed if the D epartment is taking the position that completion of services will be considered unsatisfactory if a parent fails to cooperat e in the investigat ion, (3) whether the Department should inform a parent if the permanency goal changes from family

reunification t o a different goal, and (4) any stated position on the interplay between “honest” disclosure in termination proceeding s and services completion and Fifth Amendment implications in any pending criminal matter. If any such written policies exist, the Depart ment is ordered to provide them to the Court and notify the Court whether it objects to the C ourt taking judicial notice of such policies by Tuesday

, May 29, 2018 at 5:00 p.m.

P.M. is ordered to inform the Court by Tuesday

, May 29, 2018 at 5:00 p.m.

whethe r there was a plea agreement in her criminal matter and to provide a copy of the agreement, if one exists . The parties are ordered to inform the Court at oral argument if they have any objection to this Court taking judicial notice of such agreement , if it exists

.It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

_______________________________________

 Acting for the Court

Date: May 25, 2018
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 Exhibit 24.1(a)

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------


     The undersigned certifies that he is a Director of Unisource Worldwide,
Inc. ("Unisource").

     The undersigned hereby appoints each of Hugh G. Moulton and Thomas A.
Decker as his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, to
execute, on his behalf the foregoing Report on Form 10-K, and any and all
amendments thereto, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC"), and to do all such other acts and execute all such other documents
which said attorney may deem neessary or desirable.

     Dated this 17th day of December, 1997


                                           /s/ Paul J. Darling, III
                                         ----------------------------
                                                    Director



                                      53
No. 12-7819.

#### Peyton *v.*Holloway, Warden.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
164 A.3d 395

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMIE WALLACE, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 16, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
#### In the Matter of Serenity Victoria M. and Others, Infants. Allison B., Appellant; Cardinal McCloskey Community Services, Respondent.

[51 NYS3d 886]

Appeal from orders, Family Court, Bronx County (Valerie Pels, J.), entered on or about July 31, 2015 and August 6, 2015, which, upon respondent mother’s default, determined that she suffers from mental illness as defined in Social Services Law § 384-b, terminated her parental rights to the subject children and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency for the purpose of adoption, unanimously dismissed, without costs. Order, same court and Judge, entered on or about December 1, 2015, which denied the mother’s motion to vacate her default, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The termination orders were entered upon the mother’s default, and therefore are not appealable *(see*CPLR 5511; *see also Matter of Natalie Maria D. [Miguel D.],*73 AD3d 536, 536 [1st Dept 2010]).

Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the mother’s motion to vacate her default *(see Matter of Noah Martin Benjamin L. [Frajon B.],*139 AD3d 593, 593 [1st Dept 2016]), since she failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her absences from the proceedings despite numerous adjournments *(see Matter of Lenea’jah F. [Makeba T.S.],*105 AD3d 514, 514-515 [1st Dept 2013]). Since the mother failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her default, this Court need not reach the issue of whether she presented a meritorious defense *(see id.*at 514). In any event, she failed to demonstrate a meritorious defense, since she did not refute the expert medical evidence establishing that, because of her mental illness, she was presently and for the foreseeable future unable to provide proper and adequate care for the subject children *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]).

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
<PAGE>

                  GENWORTH LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
                      OPTIONAL DEATH PROCEEDS ENDORSEMENT

This endorsement is effective on the Contract Date. It amends the Death
Provisions section by deleting the Amount Payable When Death Occurs Before
Annuity Commencement Date provision and adding the following:

Amount Payable When Death Occurs Before Annuity Commencement Date

Amount Payable upon the Death of an Owner or Joint Owner Who Is Not Also an
Annuitant: The amount payable is the Contract Value on the first Valuation Day
that we have received Proof of Death.

Death Benefit provisions upon the Death of an Annuitant or Joint Annuitant: The
amount payable (the "Death Benefit") is the greater of (a) and (b), where:

     (a) is Purchase Payments adjusted as stated below for any withdrawals and
         premium tax; and

     (b) is the Contract Value on the first Valuation Day that we have received
         Proof of Death.

Withdrawals reduce the Death Benefit proportionally by the same percentage that
the withdrawal, including any surrender charges and premium taxes, reduces the
Contract Value.

For Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company,

                             /s/ Pamela S. Schutz
                           -------------------------
                                   President

                                      1
*June 14, 2017*

2017-Ohio-4268.]

2015-1332.

#### Accel, Inc. v. Testa.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2012-2840. On appellee/eross-appellant’s motion to set date and time for oral argument. Motion denied as moot.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2115

To amend the Federal Power Act to remove the jurisdiction of the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission to license projects on fresh waters in

the State of Hawaii.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 13 (legislative day, MAY 2), 1994

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Federal Power Act to remove the jurisdiction

of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to license

projects on fresh waters in the State of Hawaii.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROJECTS ON FRESH WATERS IN THE STATE

4 OF HAWAII.

5 (a) GENERAL LICENSING AUTHORITY.—Section 4(e)

6 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 797(e)) is amended

7 by striking ‘‘several States, or upon’’ and inserting ‘‘sev8 eral States (except fresh waters in the State of Hawaii),

9 or upon’’.
2

S 2115 IS

1 (b) MANDATORY LICENSING AUTHORITY.—Section

2 23(b) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 817(b)) is

3 amended by striking ‘‘United States, or upon’’ and insert4 ing ‘‘United States (except fresh waters in the State of

5 Hawaii), or upon’’.

Æ
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Price of Blaine, WA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Price of Blaine, WA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 7.11   | 8.22   | 6.87   | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.52   | 6.62   | 8.47   | 8.36   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# DLA, VA enter partnership to improve veteran care

/ Published Aug. 13, 2019
Washington, D.C., 
Improving veteran care by centralizing the procurement of medical supplies is the goal of an interagency agreement between the Defense Logistics Agency and Department of Veterans Affairs signed at the VA Headquarters in Washington, D.C., Aug. 12.DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams and VA Secretary Robert Wilkie formalized the partnership, which is expected to help reduce costs of pharmaceutical national contracts, radiology and imaging contracts, and electronic cataloging.“In the 21st century, an ad hoc supply chain is not sufficient,” Wilkie said. “It does not do justice to those we are sworn to serve. This is part of not only comprehensive reform of this institution, but it also cements our relationship with the Department of Defense.”The partnership gives the VA access to DLA Troop Support’s worldwide procurement system for medical and surgical items, cleaning supplies and equipment, construction materials and equipment, and other supplies, according to a VA release. A centralized ordering system will also reduce risk, fraud, waste and abuse when ordering these materials.“On behalf of the Department of Defense, we are proud to be a value-add to VA on behalf of America’s veterans,” Williams said. “Leveraging economies of scale, like the ones outlined in this agreement, help us reduce costs for the military services and other government partners like VA.”The agreement is part of DLA’s Whole of Government portfolio, which provides supplies and services to non-DoD agencies, added Dan Strausbaugh, deputy division chief of DLA’s Whole of Government Support Division.“We’re always reaching out for more business to better streamline certain processes and make the taxpayer’s burden on the federal government less,” he added.
(May 23, 2017)

#### Heriberto Pratts et al., Appellants, v Bruno A. Campolo et al., Defendants, and City of New York, Respondent.

[55 NYS3d 192]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), entered August 11, 2015, which granted defendant City of New York’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*550Plaintiffs are co-guardians of David Pratts, who suffered serious injuries, including brain damage, when his motorcycle collided with a car driven by defendant Bruno A. Campolo. Plaintiffs contend that the City negligently created visual obstructions, including a green fence and City vehicles parked in a no-parking zone, that prevented Campolo from seeing Pratts.

The theory of liability premised on illegally parked City vehicles is not properly considered, because it was not asserted in the notice of claim. The notice premised liability solely on the City’s non-enforcement of parking restrictions, which did not alert the City of the need to investigate its own employees’ parking practices (see *Monmasterio v New York City Hous. Auth.,*39 AD3d 354, 356 [1st Dept 2007]; *accord Frankel v New York City Tr. Auth.,*134 AD3d 440, 440-441 [1st Dept 2015]; General Municipal Law § 50-e [6]).

The record contains conflicting testimony as to whether the installation of the green fence enclosing a parking lot and/or storage area on the corner made it more difficult for drivers to see oncoming traffic and thus constituted a breach of the City’s nondelegable duty to maintain its roads in reasonably safe condition (see *Stiuso v City of New York,*87 NY2d 889, 890-891 [1995]; *Parada v City of New York,*205 AD2d 427 [1st Dept 1994]). However, the record demonstrates conclusively that the alleged obstruction did not proximately cause the accident. Campolo testified that he stopped his car several times before turning, pulling forward far enough to get a clear view of oncoming traffic so that his vision was not obstructed when he made the left-hand turn. Even though the record contains an affidavit from a witness stating that Campolo only came to a brief stop before turning, and testimony from another witness that Campolo did not stop at all, neither statement serves to rebut Campolo’s testimony that his vision was not obstructed when he made the turn. His failure to see Pratts was therefore entirely unrelated to the City’s alleged negligence *(compare Parada,*205 AD2d at 428-429 [finding issues of fact whether “(i)nadequate sight distance caused by obstructing trees” caused car accident; driver testified that moments before impact “all I could see was those trees”]).

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Tom, Kapnick, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.02**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the Annual Report of Macrovision Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James Budge certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), that to the best of his knowledge: 

(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and 

(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as of February 28, 2007.
Docket Number FAA-2013-0548
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alfredo Lopez-Suazo, Appellant.

[64 NYS3d 521]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy L. Kahn, J.), rendered March 7, 2014, as amended April 18, 2014, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, and sentencing him to a term of one to three years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s summation are unpreserved, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal. To the extent there were isolated improprieties, they were not so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial, and any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt *(see People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1st Dept 1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 884 [1993]).

Concur— Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
# DLA Foundation scholarships awarded

/ Published June 9, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The DLA Foundation awarded 19 scholarships to students with close family connections to current or past civilian or military Defense Logistics Agency employees. Scholarships of $1,500 each are awarded annually based on merit and financial need.

The 2020 scholarship recipients and the organization and location of their DLA family members are:
      - Josias Apiou - DLA Headquarters; Columbus, Ohio
      - Jozie Brajkovich - DLA Distribution; New Cumberland, Pennsylvania
      - Timothy Bui - DLA Troop Support; Philadelphia
      - MarShae Cooksey-Webster - DLA Aviation; Midwest City, Oklahoma
      - Logan Currin - DLA Distribution; Tracy, California
      - Taylor Davis - DLA Aviation; Richmond, Virginia
      - Kelly Dearman - DLA Headquarters; Richmond, Virginia
      - Lisa Dube - DLA Disposition Services; Battle Creek, Michigan
      - Justin Edwards - DLA Indo-Pacific; Anchorage, Alaska
      - Lauren McNear - DLA Headquarters; Fort Belvoir, Virginia
      - Dominique Pelayo - DLA Distribution; New Cumberland
      - Alyssa Reed - DLA Aviation; Richmond, Virginia
      - Rooney Carter - DLA Troop Support; Philadelphia
      - Tristan Sanders - DLA Land and Maritime; Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
      - Ana Scharberg - DLA Troop Support; Philadelphia
      - Emily Seay - DLA Energy; Lorton, Virginia
      - Sean Shacklock - DLA Distribution; New Cumberland, Pennsylvania
      - Asiauana Spikes - DLA Headquarters; Robins Air Force Base, Georgia
      - Shawn Sullivan Jr. - DLA Headquarters; Fort Drum, New York

Thomas Gabel, family member of a DLA Distribution employee in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, received the DLA Foundation Scholarship in Honor of Frank Lotts, a former DLA Senior Executive Service member who inspired many throughout the agency and his community. He died in November 2007. The Frank Lotts scholarship is awarded to a student who’s pursuing a science, technology, engineering and math degree. The $2,000 scholarship is provided through an anonymous donation.  

Children, stepchildren, grandchildren, nieces or nephews of current or former DLA military or civilian employees are eligible for scholarships. The DLA Foundation accomplishes fundraising for scholarships by hosting various events throughout the year, and through personal contributions and Combined Federal Campaign donations.

The DLA Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization not affiliated with the Department of Defense.