alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Installation Management Richmond aces yearly environmental management audit

/ Published May 20, 2021
Richmond, Va, 
In 2005, Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia’s Environmental Management System was first registered to the international environmental management standard, ISO 14001. This standard specifies the requirements for an effective EMS. It provides the framework that an organization can follow, rather than establishing environmental performance requirements. 

An EMS allows the installation to care for the environment and prevent any negative impacts from daily work activities. To become registered to ISO 14001, an installation must pass a rigorous and detailed yearly audit that examines not only the location’s conformance with the standard’s numerous elements, but also its compliance with applicable internal and external environmental policies and regulations. 

DSCR’s implementation of the ISO 14001 was in response to Executive Order 13148. The EO mandates that environmental management considerations must become a fundamental and integral component of federal government policies, operations, planning and management. It also instructs all applicable federal facilities to develop and implement a formalize environmental management system.

Every year, DSCR’s EMS must undergo an external review and every three years, the entire system must be completely recertified. This year, the audit occurred May 5-7 and for the 16th consecutive year, DLA Installation Management Richmond successfully passed.  

Jimmy Parrish, chief, Environmental Management Division, DLA Installation Management Richmond, said passing an ISO 14001 recertification audit is especially tough. The impartial auditor looks through three years of historic data. More than 15 of our employees, including our senior management, were asked to explain and demonstrate their adherence to the ISO 14001 standard. Several hundred pages of written policy and regulations were closely scrutinized.

“A successful environmental management system is the epitome of teamwork. To pass these audits, all of DLA Installation Management Richmond, and our external partners, DLA Aviation’s Public Affairs Office and Richmond’s Defense Contract Management Office, pulled together to demonstrate what each organization was doing to protect the environment,” said Parrish.
2017-0218.

#### Wolfe v. Accountancy Bd.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-453, 2016-Ohio-8542.
---

---

# Exhibit 15.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852 and No. 333-136684 and
No. 333-152820 on Form S-8 of our reports dated June 25 ,2009 relating to (1) the
consolidated financial statements of Elbit Imaging Ltd. ( the company) which
report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to
claims that have been filed against Group companies and for some of those claims petitions
have been filed for certification as class actions, and (2) the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, (which
report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting because of a material weakness) appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008.

|/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.Certified Public AccountantsA member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tel-Aviv, IsraelJune
25, 2009



---

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7857

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TONYA LUTISSUE MCNEIL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CR-96-194-FO, CA-01-535-5-F)

Submitted: July 17, 2002 Decided: August 1, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tonya Lutissue McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. John Howarth Bennett,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We note that the district court did not have the benefit of

our recent decision in Hill v. Braxton, 277 F.3d 701, 707 (4th Cir.

2002) (holding that a district court must give a petitioner notice

and an opportunity to respond before dismissing his claims as

untimely under the AEDPA), in rendering its decision. We therefore

express no opinion as to the timeliness of McNeil’s motion, but

affirm on the district court’s alternative finding that McNeil is

not substantively entitled to relief under Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466 (2000).

2

PER CURIAM:

Tonya Lutissue McNeil seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the

reasoning of the district court.* See United States v. McNeil, Nos.

CR-96-194-FO; CA-01-535-5-F (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 5, 2001; entered

Sept. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2070 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2070

      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the 
deductibility of business meal expenses for individuals who are subject 
                    to Federal hours of limitation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 4 (legislative day, May 2), 1994

   Mr. Kohl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the 
deductibility of business meal expenses for individuals who are subject 
                    to Federal hours of limitation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED DEDUCTIBILITY OF BUSINESS MEAL EXPENSES FOR 
              INDIVIDUALS SUBJECT TO FEDERAL HOURS OF SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Section 274(n) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to only 50 percent of meal and entertainment expenses 
allowed as deduction) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(3) Special rule for individuals subject to federal hours 
        of service.--In the case of any expenses for food or beverages 
        consumed by an individual during, or incident to, the period of 
        duty subject to the hours of service limitations of the 
        Department of Transportation, paragraph (1) shall be applied by 
        substituting `80 percent' for `50 percent'.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994.

                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Malik Turner, Appellant, v New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development et al., Respondents.

[52 NYS3d 335]

*548Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered June 23, 2015, which denied the petition seeking to annul the determination of respondent, The New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), dated August 11, 2014, which found that petitioner was not entitled to succeed to the tenancy of his deceased grandmother’s Mitchell-Lama apartment, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

“The determination that petitioner did not sustain his burden of establishing his entitlement to succession rights to his [grandmother’s] apartment was not affected by an error of law, and was not irrational, unreasonable, or arbitrary and capricious” *(Matter of Pietropolo v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev.,*39 AD3d 406, 406 [1st Dept 2007]; CPLR 7803 [3]).

Petitioner rested his succession claim on the fact that he was included on the 2011 and 2012 income affidavits for the subject premises as proof that he resided there, and attempted to explain the lack of documentation during the co-residency period as a result of his *“young age*and status as a college student.” However, petitioner’s inclusion on the income affidavits “[does] not, in and of itself, establish his entitlement to succession rights as a matter of law” *(Matter of Pietropolo,*39 AD3d at 406-407).

Petitioner further relied on the “student exception” to the primary residency requirement, which provides that the relevant time period to establish residency is not interrupted by any period during which the family member seeking succession rights temporarily relocates because he is enrolled as a full-time student *and*that he reside in the subject apartment as his primary residence for at least two years immediately before enrolling as a full-time student (28 RCNY 3-02 [p] [5] [ii]). However, he enrolled at Morehouse College in the fall of 2011, and failed to establish that he primarily resided in the subject premises for the two years prior to starting college in 2011.

Petitioner also failed to submit any documents to establish proof of residency which were dated during the two years prior to the death of Lorraine Simmons, i.e., March 4, 2014, or that he was a full-time student at Morehouse College during that period. Petitioner did not submit his transcript until after the hearing officer issued her August 11, 2014 decision; however, even considering the transcript, discrepancies such as the *549absence of classes for the spring 2012 semester, and the fact that petitioner graduated from a high school in New Jersey made the provision of additional information supporting his primary residency all the more relevant.

Petitioner was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing (28 RCNY 3-02 [p] [8] [ii]; *see Matter of Pietropolo,*39 AD3d at 407; *Matter of Cadman Plaza N. v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev.,*290 AD2d 344, 345 [1st Dept 2002]).

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14347]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-106-001]


K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Filing of Revised 
Reconciliation Report

May 26, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 20, 1998, K N Interstate Gas Transmission 
Co. (KNI), tendered for filing its revised reconciliation report in the 
above captioned docket with respect to Section 35 (Crediting of 
Imbalance Revenue) of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1-
B.
    KNI states that the reconciliation report presents the revised 
results of KNI's imbalance revenue crediting requirement and displays 
the proposed disposition of revised amounts to be refunded for the 
reporting period of October 1, 1996, through September 30, 1997, in 
accordance with the Commission's April 21, 1998 order in this 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before June 2, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14347 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

I, Cui Xinzheng, certify that:

(1)  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of APT Satellite Holdings
Limited;

(2)  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

(3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects of the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

(4)  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
         to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
         period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about
         the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of
         the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such
         evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
         over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
         the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
         likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
         financial reporting; and

(5)  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.

Date: June 28, 2004

/s/ Cui Xinzheng
______________________
Cui Xinzheng
Director and Vice President
No. 12-749.

#### Frederick *v.*Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13962]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION NOTICE


Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC); Public Meeting

SUMMARY: This notice announces the XVI public meeting of the BECC Board 
of Directors on Wednesday, June 24, 1998, from 10:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m. in 
Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico, at the Universidad Autonoma de Coahuila, 
located on Blvd. Venustiano Carranza y Gonzalez Lobo.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M.R. Ybarra, Secretary, United States 
Section, International Boundary and Water Commission, telephone: (915) 
832-4105; or Angeles Villarreal, Public Participation Officer, Border 
Environment Cooperation Commission, P.O. Box 221648, El Paso, Texas 
79913, telephone: (011-52-16) 25-91-60; fax: (011-52-16) 25-26-99; e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#741611171734171b1711125a1b0613"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bddfd8dedefdded2ded8db93d2cfda">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Section, International Boundary and 
Water Commission, on behalf of the Border Environment Cooperation 
Commission (BECC), cordially invites the public to attend the XVI 
Public Meeting of the Board of Directors on Wednesday, June 24, 1998, 
from 10:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m., at the Universidad Autonoma de Coahuila, 
located on Blvd. Venustiano Carranza y Gonzalez Lobo in Saltillo, 
Coahuila, Mexico. Proposed Agenda, 10:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m.

1. Approval of Agenda (Action)
2. Approval of Minutes of Meeting of March 30, 1998 (Action)
3. General Manager's Report (Information)
4. Review of Projects for Certification (Action)
    * Calexico, CA
    * Lower Valley, TX
    * Donna, TX
    * Public Comments
5. Approval of Technical Assistance Grants (Action)
6. Update on Technical Assistance Program (Information)
7. Other Matters (Information)
    * Report on Sustainable Development Committee
8. General Public Comments

    Anyone interested in submitting written comments to the Board of 
Directors on any agenda item should send them to the BECC 15 days prior 
to the public meeting. Anyone interested in making a brief statement to 
the Board may do so during the public meeting.

    Dated: May 20, 1998.
M.R. Ybarra,
Secretary, U.S. IBWC.
[FR Doc. 98-13962 Filed 5-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1420]



[[Page 3342]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Proclaiming Certain Lands as Reservation for the Cow Creek Band 
of Umpqua Tribe of Indians in Oregon

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of reservation proclamation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs proclaimed 
approximately 4.07 acres as an addition to the reservation of the Cow 
Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians on December 19, 1997. This notice 
is published in the exercise of authority delegated by the Secretary of 
the Interior to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs by 209 DM 8.1.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry E. Scrivner, Bureau of Indian 
Affairs, Division of Real Estate Services, MS-4510/MIB/-Code 220, 1849 
C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240, telephone (202) 208-7737.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proclamation was issued according to the 
Act of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 986; 25 U.S.C. 467), for the tract of 
land described below. The land was proclaimed to be an addition to and 
part of the reservation of the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of 
Indians for the exclusive use of Indians on that reservation who are 
entitled to reside at the Cow Creek Reservation by enrollment or tribal 
membership.

Reservation of the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians

Douglas County, Oregon

    The following described real property is located in the Northwest 
quarter of Section 27, Township 30 South, Range 5 West, W.M., Douglas 
County, Oregon.
    Beginning at a \5/8\'' iron rod located on the easterly right of 
way of County Road Number 1 (also known as Old Pacific Highway Number 
99), said \5/8\'' iron rod bears North 30 deg.34'51'' West 335.30 feet 
from the Southwest corner of the Long Subdivision to the City of 
Canyonville (See Volume 6, Page 63, Douglas County Surveyor's Office); 
thence along said Easterly right of way of said County Road Number 1, 
North 30 deg.34'51'' West 750.62 feet to a \5/8\'' iron rod; thence 
leaving said Easterly right of way and running North 87 deg.50'25'' 
East 275.35 feet to a \3/4\'' iron pipe; thence North 87 deg.58'12'' 
East 150.92 feet to a \5/8\'' iron rod; thence South 3 deg.47'25'' East 
246.10 feet to a \5/8\'' iron rod; thence South 8 deg.49'22'' East 
421.37 feet to a \5/8\'' iron rod; thence due West 125.00 feet to the 
point of beginning. Containing 4.07 acres, more or less.
    Title to the land described above is conveyed subject to any valid 
existing easements for public roads and highways, for public utilities 
and for railroads and pipelines and any other right-of-way or 
reservation of record.

    Dated: December 19, 1997.
Kevin Gover,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-1420 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 1, 2009 

p0325 

Order 

 

April 1, 2009 

137708 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137708 

 COA: 288032 

Macomb CC: 07-004766-FC 

MICHAEL RALPH GEORGE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 3, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted. 

KELLY, C.J., and CAVANAGH and HATHAWAY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.
ACCEPTED 03-14-00679-CR 4878652 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/14/2015 11:36:35 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK


### IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS EX PARTE • 

### NO. 03-14-00679-CR LESLIE PARKER JONES MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW, Keith S. Hampton and Leslie Parker Jones, and files this his Motion to Dismiss Appeal, pursuant to Rule·42.2 ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate**Pro~edure,** and in support thereof, would show the Court the following: 

### I. Leslie Parker Jones was found guilty ofaggravated assault in Cause No. DD1-DC-08-303025 on January 22, 2009. He was sentenced to ten years of community supervision. On October 24, 2014, Appellant filed his notice ofappeal from writproceedings conducted pursuantto Article 11.072 ofthe Code ofCriminal Procedure. II. After a careful review ofhis appeal, Appellant and his counsel move to dismiss the appeal.**------~ ~-**  - -- ------

### III. This Motionto Dismiss Appeal is filed in duplicate and pursuantto Rule 42.2, the duplicate should be sent to the Travis County District Clerk. Respectfully submitted,

,-. / I , ) /(\ !

- ..,! /**~~ }**  l 

### & J KEITH S. HAMPTON Attorney at Law 1103 Nueces Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 476-8484 (o) (512) 762-6170 (c) (512) 477-3580 (±) keithshampton@gmail.com SBN# 08873230

" SLIE PARKER JONES, Appellant •

By affixing my signature above, I, KEITH S. HAMPTON, hereby certify that a true copy ofMotion to Dismiss Appeal has been delivered to the Travis County District Attorney's Office on this day, April13, 2015.

- -- - - - -- - - ----------