alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1703 Referred in House (RFH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1703

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 1994

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To expand the boundaries of the Piscataway National Park, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Piscataway National Park Expansion 
Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF PARK.

    (a) The boundaries of Piscataway Park in Maryland are hereby 
revised to reflect the addition of approximately 163 acres of lands as 
generally depicted on the map entitled ``Proposed Boundary Map--
Piscataway Park'', numbered 838-80137, and dated November 17, 1993.
    (b) The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire lands 
and interests therein within the areas added to the park pursuant to 
subsection (a) by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated 
funds, or exchange.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary 
to carry out this Act.

            Passed the Senate June 16 (legislative day, June 7), 1994.

            Attest:

                                                MARTHA S. POPE,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  August 25, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Mark  King,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Mark King
-------------------
Mark King, President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|California Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|California Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 2,146,211 | 2,309,883 | 2,339,521
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,508,797 | 2,464,565 | 2,273,193 | 2,269,405 | 2,406,889 | 2,248,256 | 2,315,721 | 2,395,674 | 2,405,266 | 2,328,504
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,273,128 | 2,153,186 | 2,403,494 | 2,415,571 | 2,339,392 | 2,301,217 | 2,172,889 | 2,116,902 | 2,137,920 | 2,145,776
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,084,467 | 2,101,312 | 2,056,267 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
2017-0450.

#### Simmons v. Miller.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. On S.CtPrac.R. 12.04 determination, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14817]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ES98-10-001]


California Power Exchange Corporation; Notice of Application

May 29, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 8, 1998, California Power Exchange 
Corporation (PX), filed an amendment application, under Section 204 of 
the Federal Power Act. The amendment seeks authorization to issue up to 
$300 million of long-term debt, instead of short-term debt, and PX also 
seeks to change the authorization period of issuance to December 31, 
2001. PX also requests a waiver of the Commission's competitive bid or 
negotiated placement requirements, under 18 CFR 34.2, Placement of 
Securities.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
and protests should be filed on or before June 12, 1998. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14817 Filed 6-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6698

RAY EDWARD WELLS, a/k/a Ray Anthony Wells,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LARRY W. POWERS; MEDICAL STAFF,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-04-178-8-CMC)

Submitted: October 18, 2005 Decided: October 20, 2005

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ray Edward Wells, Appellant Pro Se. James Howarth Ritchie, Jr.,

Scott F. Talley, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the

court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266

(1988).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ray Edward Wells seeks to appeal the district court’s

order granting summary judgment to defendants. We dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was

not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s judgment was entered on the docket

on February 23, 2005. The notice of appeal was filed on May 5,

2005.*

 Because Wells failed to file a timely notice of appeal or

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we

dismiss the appeal. We deny Wells’ motions to expedite and for

appointment of counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
- 3 -

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Edgard Espinoza, Appellant, v Fowler-Daley Owners, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[60 NYS3d 807]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered August 19, 2016, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on liability without prejudice to renew after the determination of outstanding discovery motions and the completion of discovery, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

There is no reason to entertain this appeal because, after the outstanding discovery was completed, the motion court granted plaintiff’s motion to renew his summary judgment motion, which had been denied without prejudice to renew. No appeal lies from an order or judgment that has been superseded by a subsequent order or judgment, as the initial order or judgment has become academic *(see Makastchian v Oxford Health Plans,*270 AD2d 25 [1st Dept 2000]; *Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v Town of Tonawanda Assessor,*219 AD2d 883 [4th Dept 1995]; *see also*10 Carmody-Wait 2d § 70:31 at 50-51). Here, deciding the motion on the merits renders the question raised on this appeal (whether the motion court correctly determined that plaintiff’s motion was premature) entirely academic (see *406
      *e.g. Interboro Mut. Indent. Ins. Co. v Gatterdum,*163 AD2d 788 [3d Dept 1990] [where trial court grants a motion to reargue, the original order is superseded and appeal rendered academic]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Kapnick, Kern and Moulton, JJ.
#### Com. v. Morales 24

12/29/2015

615 MAL (2015)

24

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 452
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|Price of El Paso, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|Price of El Paso, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 7.87   | 6.26   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate a contract proposal.
    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date of Meeting: May 21, 1998 (Telephone Conference).
    Time: 10:00 a.m.
    Place of Meeting: Willco Building, Suite 400, 6000 Executive 
Boulevard, Rockville, MD.
    Contact Person: Sean O'Rourke, 6000 Executive Boulevard, Suite 
409, Rockville, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-2861.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in Sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; and 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: May 20, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-14136 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 10.1


Summary
of Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements*


Each director of IAC who is not
an employee of IAC or any of its businesses receives an annual retainer of
$45,000 and the chairpersons of the Audit and Compensation and Human Resources
Committees each receive an additional annual retainer of $15,000. Members of the
Audit and Compensation and Human Resources Committees (including the
chairpersons) receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000 and $5,000,
respectively.


IAC also reimburses non-employee
directors for all reasonable expenses incurred by these directors as a result
of attendance at IAC Board and Committee meetings. In addition, non-employee
directors receive a grant of 7,500 restricted stock units (or such lesser
number of restricted stock units with a dollar value of $250,000) upon their
initial election to office and annually thereafter on the date of IAC’s annual
meeting of stockholders at which the director is re-elected. These restricted
stock units vest in three equal annual installments commencing on the first
anniversary of the grant date.


Under IAC’s Deferred Compensation
Plan for Non-Employee Directors, non-employee directors may defer all or a
portion of their annual retainer(s). Eligible directors who defer their retainer(s)
can elect to have such deferred amounts applied to the purchase of share units,
representing the number of shares of IAC Common Stock that could have been
purchased on the relevant date, or credited to a cash fund. If any dividends
are paid on IAC Common Stock, dividend equivalents will be credited on the
share units. The cash fund will be credited with deemed interest at an annual
rate equal to the weighted average prime lending rate of JPMorgan Chase Bank.


Upon termination, a director will
receive (1) with respect to share units, such number of shares of IAC
Common Stock as the share units represent and (2) with respect to the cash
fund, a cash payment. Payments upon termination will be made in either one lump
sum or up to five installments, as previously elected by the eligible director
at the time of the related deferral election.


 






*                                         The non-employee director compensation
arrangements described above, which arrangements were approved by the
Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the IAC Board of Directors on May 17,
2006, will become effective on July 1, 2006.
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Laredo, TX Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Laredo, TX Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |        |        |        | 0      | 7,405  | 80,094
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 104,255 | 102,058 | 113,451 | 131,546 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
2016-1372.

#### Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc.

Cuyahoga App. No. 103377, 2016-Ohio-3175..Discretionary appeal accepted on proposition of law No. I.

Kennedy and French, JJ., would also accept the cause on proposition of law No. II.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23

              Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Unisource Worldwide, Inc. of our report dated October 21, 1997, included in
the 1997 Annual Report to the Shareholders of Unisource Worldwide, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Unisource
Worldwide, Inc. listed in item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements on Form S-4 and Form S-8 of Unisource Worldwide, Inc. and in the
related Prospectuses of our report dated October 21, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Unisource Worldwide, Inc. incorporated by
reference in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30,
1997, filed with Securities and Exchange Commission.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
REGISTRATION
NUMBER             FILING DATE               DESCRIPTION
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>             <C>                <C>
333-17141       December 2, 1996   Unisource Worldwide, Inc.
                                   Stock Option Plan
 
333-17949       December 16, 1996  Unisource Worldwide, Inc.
                                   Directors' Stock Option Plan
 
333-17947       December 16, 1996  Unisource Worldwide, Inc.
                                   Partners' Stock Purchase Plan
 
333-17951       December 16, 1996  Unisource Worldwide, Inc.
                                   Retirement Savings Plan
 
333-17953       December 16, 1996  Unisource Worldwide, Inc.
                                   Stock Award Plan
 
333-25897       April 25, 1997     Unisource Worldwide, Inc.
                                   5,000,000 Shares of Common Stock
</TABLE>

                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 15, 1997
                                        
                                      52