alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Glenn Alan Jarrett, an Attorney.

[52 NYS3d 689]

Per Curiam.

Glenn Alan Jarrett was admitted to practice by this Court in 2003 and lists a business address in South Burlington, Vermont with the Office of Court Administration. Jarrett has applied to this Court, by affidavit sworn to January 31, 2017, for leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons *(see*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney, and Jarrett replies by correspondence with attachments dated May 8, 2017.

Contrary to the position of AGC, we find that the identity of the notary who witnessed Jarrett’s affidavit execution is readily ascertainable within the four corners of the papers submitted in support of the application. With no substantive opposition to the application having been advanced, and having determined that Jarrett is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant the application and accept his resignation.

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Garry, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur.

Ordered that Glenn Alan Jarrett’s application for permission to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further ordered that Glenn Alan Jarrett’s name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court *(see generally*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]); and it is further ordered that, effective immediately, Glenn Alan Jarrett is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Jarrett is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further ordered that Glenn Alan Jarrett shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derrick Hill, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 424]

— Appeal from a judgment of Erie County Court (DiTullio, J.), entered November 28, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Hurlbutt and Kehoe, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3014-3015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1265]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determinations

    Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 FR 
13359, March 29, 1978),

[[Page 3015]]

and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 (50 FR 27393, July 2, 
1985), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the 
exhibit, ``Ancient Gold: The Wealth of the Thracians, Treasures from 
the Republic of Bulgaria'' (See list \1\) imported from abroad for the 
temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign lender. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the listed exhibit objects at Saint Louis Art Museum, 
Saint Louis, MO, from on or about February 5, 1998, to on or about 
April 5, 1998; Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, TX, from on or about May 
3, 1998, to on or about July 19, 1998; California Palace of the Legion 
of Honor, San Francisco, CA, from on or about July 31, 1998, to on or 
about October 25, 1998; New Orleans Museum of Art, New Orleans, LA, 
from on or about October 31, 1998, to on or about January 31, 1999; 
Memphis Brooks Museum of Art, Memphis, TN, from on or about January 17, 
1999, to on or about March 28, 1999; Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, MA, 
from on or about April 2, 1999, to on or about June 7, 1999; The 
Detroit Institute of Arts, Detroit, MI, from on or about June 19, 1999, 
to on or about August 29, 1999, is in the national interest. Public 
Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

    \1\ A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Mr. Paul 
Manning, Assistant General Counsel, at 202/619-5997, and the address 
is Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th Street, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20547-0001

    Dated: January 14, 1998.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-1265 Filed 1-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned executive officers of First South Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



                                       By: /s/ Thomas A. Vann
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Thomas A. Vann
                                           Title: President and Chief Executive
                                                  Officer



                                       By: /s/ William L. Wall
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  William L. Wall
                                           Title: Executive Vice President,
                                                  Chief Financial Officer and
                                                  Secretary

Date: March 11, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Karen Rochez, Appellant.

[55 NYS3d 247]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis J. Boyle, J., at plea, William McGuire, J., at sentencing and resentencing), rendered August 4, 2014, as amended August 5, 2014, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Acosta, P.J., Richter, Feinman, Webber and Kahn, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20

                  [AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]


                                BOARD RESOLUTION
                            November 11, 1997 Meeting
                                 Omaha, Nebraska



WHEREAS, AmeriTrade Holding Corporation (the "Company") maintains AmeriTrade
Holding Corporation 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan");

WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13 of the Plan, the Board of
Directors of the Company has the authority to amend the Plan, subject to certain
restrictions; and

WHEREAS, amendment of the Plan is now considered desirable; and

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that the Plan be, and its hereby is, amended
effective for awards made after the date this resolution is adopted, by
substituting the following for Section 3 of the Plan:

         "3. Participation. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the
Board or the Committee shall determine and designate, from time to time, from
among the employees of the Company who are key executives or managerial
employees those persons who will be granted one or more Awards under the Plan,
and thereby become "Participants" in the Plan. In the discretion of the Board or
the Committee, and subject to the terms of the Plan, a Participant may be
granted any Award permitted under the provisions of the Plan, and more than one
Award may be granted to a Participant. Except as otherwise agreed by the Board
or the Committee and the Participant, or except as otherwise provided in the
Plan, an Award under the Plan shall not affect any previous Award under the Plan
or an award under any other plan maintained by the Company. For purposes of the
Plan, the term "Award" shall mean any award or benefit granted to any
Participant under the Plan."



11/11/97
-----------------------------
Date


                                                   /s/ J. Peter Ricketts
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   J. Peter Ricketts
                                                   Corporate Secretary
EXHIBIT 13 

**Royal Standard Minerals Inc.**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Roland M. Larsen, Chief Executive Officer of Royal Standard Minerals Inc. ("theCompany"), certify that:- the annual report on Form 20F of the Company for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2010    as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

\s\ Roland M. Larsen Roland M. Larsen President & CEO July 27, 2010 

** 
Royal Standard Minerals Inc. 
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, J. Allan Ringler, Director of Royal Standard Minerals Inc. ("theCompany"), certify that:- the annual report on Form 20F of the Company for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2010    as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

\s\ J. Allan Ringler J. Allan Ringler Director and CFO July 27, 2010**
160 A.3d 703

#### JOE WALKER AND JO-ANN WALKER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. QUICK PICK SERVICE, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.
#### Branch Banking and Trust Company, Respondent, v Leonard A. Farber et al., Appellants.

[51 NYS3d 883]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered February 1, 2016, which denied defendants’ motion to renew plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants failed to offer new facts that would have changed the court’s prior determination and to establish reasonable justification for their failure to present such facts on the prior motion (CPLR 2221 [e]; *see Henry v Peguero,*72 AD3d 600 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
San Joaquin’s Hackney Receives the Achievement in Equal Employment Opportunity Top Honor
 
  By Annette Silva, DLA Distribution San Joaquin Public Affairs
  Theodore Hackney, deputy chief of the Specialized Missions Division at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution San Joaquin, California, was awarded the Achievement in Equal Employment Opportunity top honors at the Defense Logistics Agency 52nd Annual Employee Recognition Program ceremony Dec. 6 held at the Andrew T. McNamara Complex, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Hackney demonstrates that he has an acute ability to look beyond the surface, see through emotion and work toward decisions based on merit with best intentions for fair and equitable treatment for all DLA Distribution San Joaquin employees. “Hackney embodies fair and equitable treatment and diversity awareness in his life and in his everyday leadership and management decisions as a senior leader at DLA Distribution San Joaquin,” said DLA Distribution San Joaquin Commander Marine Col. Tiffany Harris. He takes pride in creating awareness through special emphasis events and has been an integral member of the team for the past 15 years. For Black History Month, he regularly moderates and speaks at the events. His contributions created amazing results as the center’s overall 2018 culture increased 141% from 2016. Hackney is a valued mentor and coach. He takes pride in mentoring his employees and has served as a mentor for numerous supervisors, managers and employees seeking advancement. Mentoring consisted of both formal and informal and offered insight into various working areas that had room for growth and helped these individuals see beyond the immediate promotion to understand their growth potential. Further, Hackney is fully aware of San Joaquin’s production environment and the challenge of finding the best candidate for the job. He was well suited to serve on numerous hiring panels. Serving as a panel member, selecting official and panel chair, his extensive experience afforded him the opportunity to train other less experience panel members ensuring the hiring process was always consistent. Hackney goes above and beyond in creating a positive culture at the distribution center. He volunteered to serve as the site’s mediator for numerous mediations. He worked as a facilitator in the Alternate Dispute Resolution process maintaining neutrality by establishing himself as fair with employees, union representatives and managers. Further, he worked in unison with command, J1 Equal Employment Opportunity staff, outside ADR representatives and the legal office. Additionally, he serves as a mediator for tenant organizations on the installation. Hackney not only provides invaluable support to the mission but regularly volunteers in his community. He served as an ambassador in his church and served as a speaker/teacher, moderating men’s conferences and teaching classes. “Mr. Hackney unfailingly demonstrates the highest standards of fair and equitable treatment for our workforce and served as a role model,” said Harris. “He is very deserving of this honor.”
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 98-072]


NASA Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council.

DATES: Wednesday, June 17, 1998, 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.; and Thursday, 
June 18, 1998, 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Room 9H40, 
300 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Anne L. Accola, Code Z, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-
2096.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--ISS Program Status and Assembly Sequence
--ISS Utilization
--Shuttle Upgrades
--Space Transportation Investment Strategy
--Technology Development in the Enterprises
--Commercial Technology Program and SBIR'S/STTR'S
--Radiation-Hardened Electronics
--Committee/TaskForce/Working Group Reports
--Discussion of Findings and Recommendations

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: May 27, 1998.
Matthew M. Crouch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-14597 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Re-Exports to Egypt (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Re-Exports to Egypt (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 16.71  | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian T. Joseph, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 412]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Berkowitz, J., at plea; Quinn, J., at sentence), rendered April 29, 2015, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (seven counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (six counts), and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the motion of Stephen R. Mahler for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the appellant’s new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Judah Maltz, Esq., 125-10 Queens Boulevard, Suite 12, Kew Gardens, NY, 11415, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant’s new assigned counsel; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 4, 2015, the appellant was granted leave *762to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

The brief submitted by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]) is deficient. Although counsel noted that a nonfrivolous issue existed as to whether the defendant’s appeal waiver was invalid, upon our independent review, we find that additional nonfrivolous issues exist. If, as counsel contends, the defendant’s appeal waiver was invalid, there are other nonfrivolous issues including, but not limited to, whether the sentence imposed was excessive. Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted (see *People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633, 638 [2001]; *People v Tissiera,*138 AD3d 1040 [2016]).

Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Sgroi, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.