alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011086EN.01007201.xml

| 1.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 86/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 86/72

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2011/203/CFSP

of 31 March 2011

amending Decision 2010/445/CFSP extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the crisis in Georgia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28, Article 31(2) and Article 33 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 25 September 2008, the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/760/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Pierre MOREL European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the crisis in Georgia until 28 February 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 25 September 2008, the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/760/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Pierre MOREL European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the crisis in Georgia until 28 February 2009.

| (2) | On 11 August 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/445/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 31 August 2011. The financial reference amount provided for to cover the expenditure relating to the mandate of the EUSR until that date was set at EUR 700 000. The financial reference amount should be increased to EUR 1 004 000 in order to allow for additional operational needs. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 11 August 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/445/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 31 August 2011. The financial reference amount provided for to cover the expenditure relating to the mandate of the EUSR until that date was set at EUR 700 000. The financial reference amount should be increased to EUR 1 004 000 in order to allow for additional operational needs.

| (3) | Decision 2010/445/CFSP should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2010/445/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 5 of Decision 2010/445/CFSP, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure relating to the mandate of the EUSR during the period from 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011 shall be EUR 1 004 000.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply from 1 March 2011.

Done at Brussels, 31 March 2011.

For the Council

The President

VÖLNER P.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 259, 27.9.2008, p. 16.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 211, 12.8.2010, p. 33.

2

---
# DLA medical logistics team provides personal protective equipment to new COVID hotspots 

/ Published July 20, 2020
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency is providing much needed personal protective equipment and test supplies to state and local hotspots as COVID-19 cases continue rising in the U.S.

The DLA Troop Support medical team worked with DLA Distribution during the July 4 holiday to fulfill multiple requests for items used at test sites in Texas, Florida and Louisiana. Employees volunteered to process, pack and ship the goods through the three-day holiday weekend.

“DLA never sleeps; we never take a day off,” said Kevin Echelberger, medical resolution specialist supervisor.

The Office of the Surgeon General requested over a million pairs of gloves, testing supplies and hand sanitizer just before the holiday. Thomas Heleniak, a tailored vendor logistic specialist on the medical team, processed the orders as workers at DLA Distribution Susquehanna packed the items. The gloves began arriving at Health and Human Services offices in all three states the following Monday.

“I believe the process went very well,” Heleniak said. “The key was communication. From the surgeon general’s office, to DLA Troop Support, to DLA Distribution.”

Another 480,000 gloves were delivered to HHS offices in Arizona through a separate request. And a July 6 Defense Health Agency request for over 6,000 test swabs and 6,000 viral transport mediums was met within two days.

The work continued the following week when DLA Troop Support received a same-day requirement to replace recalled hand sanitizer at the Louisiana Surge COVID-19 testing site. Working with DLA Distribution, the medical team expedited an overnight shipment of 86,400 bottles of hand sanitizer that was received July 11.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

EDWARD H. ARNOLD AND JEANNE D.

ARNOLD

 v.

CHERNERY MANAGEMENT, INC.; ROY

E. HAHN; LARRY J. AUSTIN; HARRIS

MYCFO, INC.; PHIL GROVES; ART

SHAW; FRANK TIRELLI; STARS

HOLDING COMPANY, INC. F/K/A

MYCFO, INC.; HOULIHAN CAPITAL,

LLC; HOULIHAN CAPITAL HOLDINGS,

INC. F/K/A HOULIHAN VALUATION

ADVISORS, INC.; COGENT CAPITAL

F/K/A HOULIHAN VALUATION

ADVISORS, INC.; LEBOEUF LAMB

GREENE & MACRAE LLP N/K/A DEWEY

& LEBOEUF, LLP; GRAHAM R. TAYLOR;

SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP

N/K/A SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP; R.J. RUBLE;

GRANT THORNTON LLP; HILLWOOD

INVESTMENT FUND LLC; THOMSON

INVESTMENT FUND LLC; AND EPPING

INVESTMENT FUND LLC

PETITION OF: HARRIS MYCFO, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 422 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Exhibit 99.1

Independent Accountants' Report

Board of Directors
Electronic Processing, Inc.
Kansas City, Kansas

We
have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Electronic Processing, Inc. as of December 31, 1999, and the related statements of income, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audits.

We
conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In
our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Electronic Processing, Inc. as of
December 31, 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

|/s/BAIRD, KURTZ & DOBSON                |  | 
|--------------------------------------- |  | 
|Kansas City, Missouri
February 25, 2000 |  | 

---
Exhibit 10.18 (a)



AMENDMENT TO THE


FRONTIER AIRLINES 2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN


March 30, 2006


          1. Plan Sponsor: Frontier
Airlines, Inc.,
a Colorado Corporation.


          2.
Amendment of Plan: The
following Amendment to the Frontier Airlines 2004 Equity Incentive Plan is
hereby adopted, effective as provided in Paragraph 3:


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
A. 

	
Section 2(j)
is amended by replacing the existing Section 2(j) with the following new
Section 2(j): 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
(j)

	
“Share”
  means a share of the common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Frontier
  Airlines Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, or the number and kind of
  shares of stock or other securities which will be substituted or adjusted or
  such shares as provided in Section 11.





          3.
Effective Date: The Effective
Date of this Amendment will be the date that Frontier Airlines Holdings, Inc.
common stock is first publicly traded.


          4.
Terms and Conditions of Plan: Except for the above Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Plan are
unamended and remain in full force and effect.


          5.
Execution: The Plan Sponsor
has executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
FRONTIER
  AIRLINES, INC.

  Plan
  Sponsor


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
By:

	
 


	
 

	
 

	



	
 

	
 

	
Paul H. Tate

  Senior Vice President and

  Chief Financial Officer
# New deal is moving out the metal

/ Published Oct. 2, 2020
CAMP ARIFJAN, Kuwait, 
Large piles of scrap metal in Kuwait will be whittled down under a new contract the Defense Logistics Agency arranged with a local company.

Almost one millions pounds was transported from the DLA Disposition Services site at Camp Arifjan in early September during the first week of removals. By the end of the second week the overall total reached 2.2 million pounds. As the staff prepared for the move, Area Manager Juan Green said he knew everyone was going to be moving quickly just to get it started.

“It is actually getting very busy,” Green said. “We are receiving between 12 and 18 trucks to load scrap into and still working the customer property turn in process; reutilization, transfer and donation requests, conducting training and preforming demilitarization on controlled items.”

The deal allows for up to 15 million pounds of scrap material to be removed from Arifjan. The arrangement is patterned after the way scrap material is collected at military sites in the United States. In fact, Carlos Torres, Public Sales Division chief for DLA Disposition Services’ Acquisition directorate, described the Kuwait scrap operations as “pretty routine.”
Exhibit 32.2

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  February 24, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patrick Cefalu, CFO of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Patrick Cefalu
----------------------
Patrick Cefalu, CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)
2016-1658.

#### Kitson v. Gordon Pood Serv.

Medina App. No. 15CA0078-M, 2016-Ohio-7079.
#### TDD Irrevocable Trust v J & A Saporta Realty Corp.

2d Dept: 139 AD3d 706, 708

denied
2016-1883.

#### Chase Home Fin., L.L.C. v. Gau.

Ashtabula App. No. 2016-A-0048, 2016-Ohio-7646. Reported at 160 Ohio St.3d 1409, 2017-Ohio-6964, 78 N.E.3d 909. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1215-DR]


Tennessee; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Tennessee, (FEMA-1215-DR), dated April 20, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 26, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Tennessee, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of April 20, 1998:

    Hamblen County for Individual Assistance.
    Polk and Wilson Counties for Public Assistance (already 
designated for Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-14994 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### Steven Grover, Respondent, v 291 Marion Realty Co. et al., Appellants.

[51 NYS3d 881]

*478Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.), entered May 12, 2016, which, in this action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff slipped and fell down the stairs in defendants’ building, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff testified that following his fall, his shorts were wet; there was a mop bucket at the bottom of the stairs; and a mop was being used to prop open a door. His neighbor, who was with him at the time of the fall, offered similar, consistent testimony and added that the second-floor landing was wet at the time of the fall. Under the circumstances presented, the motion court properly concluded that triable issues of fact exist as to whether defendants created or had constructive notice of the hazardous condition that caused plaintiff’s fall (see *e.g. Velez v New York City Hous. Auth.,*91 AD3d 422 [1st Dept 2012]; *Healy v ARP Cable,*299 AD2d 152, 154-155 [1st Dept 2002]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 8, 2005
    
    
    
    /s/ DAVID E. MEADORDavid E. MeadorExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer ofMichigan Consolidated Gas Company
160 A.3d 695

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF J.H., A JUVENILE. (J.H.-PETITIONER)

February 13, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Kenneth L. Hignett, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary ofMorgan’s Foods, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: (3) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended August 14,2005 (the “Report”), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: September 28, 2005    /s/ Kenneth L. Hignett     Kenneth L. Hignett, Senior Vice President,
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00244

- CV

EMIL KINCEY AND LEON A

BROWN APPELLANTS

V.

DTRE, LLC APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDG MENT

------------

On November 19, 2010 , we notified appellant s that their brief had not been

filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

unles s appellant s or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.

Because appellant s' brief has not bee n filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a) (1) , 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant s shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DE LIVERED: December 30 , 2010
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 99-50440

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

MARIA DEL ROSARIO PORRAS-RODRIGUEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(P-99-CR-7-ALL)

May 5, 2000

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed essentially for

the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough order of March

17, 1999.

AFFIRMED.
Page 1

C: \ Users \ cstallings \ Documents \ Exemption No 11914 Amendment req uest.doc 19 October 2015

Administrator

Federal Aviation Administration

Re: Exemption No. 11914 Reg ulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1373

Dear Sir or Madam:

Please accept this as formal petition to amend McKim & Creed Inc.’s (hereinafter petitioner or operator) se ction 333 exemption number 11914 to add the following sUAS:

• DJI Inspire 1

• DJI Phantom 3

• DJI Phantom 2

• DJI S1000

• 3DR Solo

• 3DR X8

- M

• 3DR IRIS

• SensF ly ebee

• SensF ly exom

• P recisionH awk HawkEye Lancaster

• Trimble UX5

• Swift Radioplane Lynx M

The FAA previously det ermined the airworthiness of the DJI Inspire 1 in Exemption No. 11295 (RoboFlight Systems LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI Phantom 2 in Exemption No. 11260 (First Flight Photography, LLC). The FAA previously

determined the a irworthiness of the DJI Phantom 3 in Exemption No. 12997 (New England Studio LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI S1000 in Exemption No. 11881 (Empire Unmanned LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the

3DR Sol o in Exemption No. 11832 ( AUV, LLC). The FAA has previously determined the

airworthiness of the 3DR X8

- M in Exemption No. 12084 (Robert B. Dreer). The FAA previously

determined the airworthiness of the 3DR IRI S in Exemption No. 1 2368 (Dark Technologies, LLC). ( The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the Sensfly ebee in Exemption No. 11263 (SensFly Ltd.). Th e FAA Previously determined the airworthiness of the SensFly exom in Exemption No. 11263A (SensFly Ltd.) The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the

PrecisionHawk HawkEye Lancaster in Exemption No. 11273 (AIG PC Global Services, Inc.). The FAA p reviously determined the airworthiness of the Trimble UX5 in Exemption No. 11110Page 2

C: \ Users \ cstallings \ Documents \ Exemption No 11914 Amendment req uest.doc (Trimble navigation LTD.). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the Swift Radioplane Lynx M in Exemption No. 11432A (Compass Data, Inc.).

All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of our current FAA Exemption No. 11914. Since the requested amendment to McKim & Creeds exemption would not set any precedent or raise any novel issue, and because petitioner seeks to begin these

op erations without delay, McKim & Creed respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good

cause exists to grant the requested amendment expeditiously by summary means.

Based on the foregoing, Petitioner hereby requests that the FAA grant this petition and provide such further relief as deemed appropriate for the operations proposed herein.

Please let me know if you require additional information in support of this petit ion.

Sincerely,

Mr. Timothy Cawood, PLS

Senior Vice President

McKim & Creed Inc. 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 500 Raleigh, NC 27606
**Exhibit 23.01**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors of 

Macrovision Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-134478, 333-101071, 333-110271, 333-49404, 333-49390, 333-60499, and 333-23213) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-148209, 333-138596, 333-95337, 333-93477, and 333-55757) on Form S-3 of MacrovisionCorporation of our reports dated February 26, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Macrovision Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income,stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in theDecember 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Macrovision Corporation. 

Our audit report on the consolidated financial statementsdated February 26, 2008, refers to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes*, on January 1, 2007, and the adoption of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standard No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*, on January 1, 2006. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Mountain View, California 

February 28, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                   ERESEARCHTECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bruce Johnson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 10, 2006                           Bruce Johnson
                                            -------------------------
                                            Bruce Johnson,
                                            Executive Vice President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer


This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.