alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, August 19, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00558-CV

____________

FRANKLIN MARLON JEROME AKA FRANKLIN M. JEROME, Appellant

V.

OSCAR VALLE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14-DCV-213767

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 18, 2016. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Elizabeth Wittu, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
#### Com. v. Berrios

10/27/2015

391 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1137
# Analyst values personal, professional growth at DLA

/ Published Sept. 30, 2019
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
Many Defense Logistics Agency employees might consider audit work daunting, but Business Process Analyst Haleema Rehman finds the work rewarding and even fun, thanks to the many agencywide benefits and the people she works with.

Rehman has worked for DLA since 2006, first in DLA Energy, and then for DLA Logistics Operations. She was then tapped to be part of DLA’s Audit Task Force.

She returned to DLA Logistics Operations as part of a team working the Distribution Standard System to Enterprise Business System variance cleanup. Her duties include data validation, workload prioritization, dissemination, monitoring and providing senior leaders with status briefings.

“We collaborate and coordinate communication and actions among key stakeholders such as the major subordinate commands, DLA Finance and DLA Distribution,” Rehman said.

While with the ATF, Rehman said she was excited to help the agency work toward audit advancement and valued the chance to partner with the team.

She believes her educational background and being a part of DLA Energy’s Audit Readiness team has helped her transition her skills to her current position.

“This is something I care deeply about because it helps DLA be transparent and shows that DLA is accountable for the taxpayers’ dollars – we know how the money is being spent,” she said. “It’s greater than just being able to track finances for the agency, it impacts all taxpayers.”

Personal growth and career enhancement are among Rehman’s favorite things about working for DLA. She’s taken advantage of the DLA Executive Development Program and the Harvard Kennedy School Senior Executive Fellows Program as well as the agency’s rotation program with the full support of her managers.

Rehman appreciates the benefits DLA offers its employees like the Fitness Center and Toastmasters.

“You’re not here just as an employee. You can work on your physical health and attend different workshops for your emotional health,” she said.

She added that Toastmasters has developed her public speaking, leadership and mentorship skills.

“Another great thing about DLA is that senior leadership is so accessible to us. You just ask for meetings and people meet with you,” she said. “It’s why I’ve been here so long – the agency believes in its people.”

In her spare time, Rehman enjoys Islamic art and Arabic calligraphy. She also has a passion for mentoring Muslim youth to grow in confidence and faith.

“I realize that oftentimes they just need someone to listen to them,” she said. “I like to be that person who can listen.”

Rehman’s hobbies include yoga, enjoying nature and reading. She also serves on the board of a nonprofit faith-based organization and organizes art nights to provide a space for women to feel empowered.
Exhibit 10.2(b)

Schedule of Secured Convertible Notes (refinancings after October 31, 2005)
issued by NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind during the three months ended
March 31, 2006



                                                                   Conversion
      Issue Date           Due Date             Principal           Price (a)
      ----------           --------             ---------          -----------
       01/12/06            07/12/06           $ 31,637,249           $0.0100
       02/07/06            08/07/06             15,653,600           $0.0100
       02/13/06            08/13/06             27,034,868           $0.0100
       03/10/06            09/10/06              1,465,413           $0.0100

                                             ----------------
                                              $ 75,791,130
                                             ================

     (a)  Note conversion price will be the greater of: (i) the lowest last sale
          price of NCT's common stock during the two-day period comprised of the
          date of the  note and the  preceding  date;  or (ii) the par  value of
          NCT's common stock on the date the  conversion  notice is delivered to
          NCT.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Aquila, Inc.**

**Chief Executive Officer**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 
|   | I, Richard C. Green, certify that: |
|--------|------------------------------------|

 
|   | 1. | Aquila, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2006 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | 2. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aquila, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: August 2, 2006

 
|   | /s/ Richard C. Green |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | Richard C. Green     |  
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 

Aquila, Inc.

 

 

 

  |
2017-0049.

#### State ex rel. Young v. Butler Cty. Personnel Office.

Franklin App. No. 15AP-1035, 2016-0hio-8341. On appellant’s application for dismissal. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.
# New Commander at DLA Energy Okinawa

/ Published June 27, 2019

The reverberating beat of traditional Okinawan drums marked the transition of leadership during the Defense Logistics Agency Energy Okinawa change of command ceremony at Camp Shields, Okinawa, June 21.

Air Force Lt. Col. Jarrett Weiblen relinquished command of the only Defense Fuel Support Point in the Indo-Pacific region to the new commander, Air Force Maj. Tracy Gilmore. The DLA Indo-PacificCommander Navy Capt. Kristin Acquavella presided over the leadership transition.

The Indo-Pacific region is DLA Energy’s largest geographical fuel region. It maintains constant supervision over product inventory, provides theater contingency and exercise support, monitors product quality throughout the region and coordinates unique alternative fuels and renewable energy requirements.

During his tour, Weiblen spearheaded the modernization of DLA Energy Okinawa’s ocean tanker receipt capabilities with an initial cost avoidance of $12 million greatly reducing the supply chain risk to Kadena Air Base and the U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Futenma. He was responsible for managing a $2 million annual operating budget and bulk petroleum operation which consists of six fuel terminals, 78 miles of pipeline, two offshore discharge facilities, and 21 tanks with 53 million gallons of storage capacity.

Reflecting on his command tour, Weiblen said that one of his biggest accomplishments was integrating personnel and sustaining operational effectiveness of the Warfighter.

“We championed improved communication and greater integration between DLA Energy’s culture and our Okinawan workforce which had transitioned from the 505th Army Quartermaster Battalion,” Weiblen said.

Weiblen’s next assignment is United States Force Korea Camp Humphreys as the Branch Chief, International Agreements, in the J4.

Gilmore is a recent graduate of the Air Command and Staff College at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama.  Prior to that assignment, she was the Deputy Director for the Commander’s Action Group at the Special Operations Command Pacific at Camp H.M. Smith, Hawaii.

“I am excited to be a part of the DLA-Energy Okinawa team, and I look forward to helping provide our customers with energy solutions in the most effective and efficient manner,” Gilmore said.
2017-1718.

#### White v. Eppinger.

In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
(logo) Long Beach Mortgage
                                             Company

January 12, 1997

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, Long Beach Mortgage  Company has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  UNIFORM  SINGLE  ATTESTATION
PROGRAM  FOR  MORTGAGE  BANKERS.  As of and for this  same  period,  Long  Beach
Mortgage  Company  had in effect a fidelity  bond in the amount of $ 10,000,000
and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $3,500,000.


/s/ Patricia L. Wayman                       /s/ Sheridan Brooks
Patricia Wayman                              Sheridan Brooks
President                                    Controller
Servicing Division





1068 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD, ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92868 (714) 543-5262      (logo)
                                                                   Equal Housing
                                                                       LENDER
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1992

To amend chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, to provide for results

based regulations, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 25 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. ROTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To amend chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, to provide

for results based regulations, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Results Based Regula5 tions Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. RESULTS BASED REGULATIONS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 5 of title 5, United

8 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 559 the

9 following new section:
2

•S 1992 IS

1 ‘‘§ 560. Results based regulations

2 ‘‘(a) For purposes of this section the term ‘regula3 tion’ means any rule for which the agency publishes a gen4 eral notice of proposed rulemaking under section 553(b)

5 or any other law.

6 ‘‘(b) To the greatest extent practicable, each agency

7 shall include in the general notice of proposed rulemaking

8 relating to a regulation—

9 ‘‘(1) a statement of—

10 ‘‘(A) the overall outcomes and results to be

11 achieved by the regulation;

12 ‘‘(B) methods to quantify such outcomes

13 and results;

14 ‘‘(C) possible alternative methods to

15 achieve such outcomes and results; and

16 ‘‘(D) a process for waiving in whole or part

17 such regulation if an alternative is subsequently

18 proposed under which the agency determines

19 the waiver applicant, and others covered by

20 such waiver, would have no less of an impact on

21 the achievement of those outcomes and results

22 than would occur without such waiver; and

23 ‘‘(2) a solicitation for comments by persons af24 fected by the regulation on the methods and proc25 esses described under paragraph (1) (B), (C), and

26 (D).
3

•S 1992 IS

1 ‘‘(c) An agency action taken under this section shall

2 not be subject to review by a court of the United States.’’.

3 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

4 The table of sections for chapter 5 of title 5, United States

5 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

6 section 559 the following new item:

‘‘560. Results based regulations.’’.

7 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect

9 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Peter A. Blake, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 417]

*1036Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 6, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a police officer by the New York City Police Department from 1991 to 2002. He was placed on dismissal probation status for one year as the result of an incident in 1999, when, during his off-duty hours, he drove his motor vehicle through three red lights and then failed to comply with a police officer’s order to pull over. While still on dismissal probationary status, claimant, in his capacity as the landlord of a multi-unit building, removed the door, appliances and fixtures from an apartment while it was still leased to a tenant. After the police were called by the tenant, claimant refused a police supervisor’s order to replace the door on the apartment so that the tenant would be able to secure her possessions.* Claimant was thereafter discharged from his position as a police officer, based upon his refusal to comply with the orders of on-duty police personnel.

Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that claimant lost his employment under disqualifying circumstances. An employee’s refusal to comply with a reasonable order may constitute disqualifying misconduct (see *Matter of Shabazz-Allah [College of New Rochelle—Sweeney],*247 AD2d 749, 750 [1998]), particularly when the claimant has already been placed on probationary status for similar conduct, as was the case in this matter *(see Matter of Godinez [Commissioner of Labor],*276 AD2d 1012 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 701 [2001]). Claimant’s contrary version of the events precipitating his dismissal raised issues of credibility for resolution by the Board *(see Matter of Jackson [Commissioner of Labor],*275 AD2d 826 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 769 [2000]). The remaining contentions at issue herein have been reviewed and found to be unpersuasive.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

*

 Claimant was arrested for unlawful eviction but the criminal charge was subsequently dismissed.
#### B.D. Estate Planning Corp., Respondent, v Marcy Trachtenberg, as Trustee of the Ellis Limquee Family Insurance Trust, Defendant, and Carolyn Limquee, Appellant.

[53 NYS3d 26]

Orders, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered October 28, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant Carolyn Limquee’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against her on the ground of the affirmative defense of recovery of fruits of the crimes barred, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment dismissing defendant’s affirmative defense of bribery and corruption, and granted plaintiff’s motion to confirm a referee’s report and hold defendant in civil contempt, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary dismissal of the complaint as against defendant Limquee is not mandated by the doctrine of law of the case. In a prior appeal, this Court granted defendant leave to amend her answer to plead the affirmative defense of recovery of fruits of crimes barred, finding that the record indicated that the insurance policy at issue “may have been part of the scheme to defraud that resulted in the criminal conviction of plaintiff’s principal” *(B.D. Estate Planning Corp. v Trachtenberg,*134 AD3d 650, 651 [1st Dept 2015]). In her motion for summary judgment, defendant failed to establish prima facie that the insurance policy at issue actually was part of the scheme to defraud. The materials she submitted from the federal criminal sentencing proceedings against plaintiff’s principal demonstrate that the federal government neither charged plaintiff’s principal with fraud in procuring the subject policy nor presented any proof of such fraud at trial, and defendant submitted no other evidence of such fraud. Since, contrary to defendant’s contention, the issue whether the subject policy was *551procured by fraud was not litigated in the federal action, it is not barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel (see *Kaufman v Eli Lilly & Co.,*65 NY2d 449, 455 [1985]).

We perceive no basis for disturbing the motion court’s finding of civil contempt (see *El-Dehdan v El-Dehdan,*26 NY3d 19, 29 [2015]). The record demonstrates that defendant knowingly disobeyed a court order directing her not to invade the corpus of the trust during the pendency of this action.

The court correctly dismissed defendant’s unsupported defense of bribery and corruption.

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.
# Vehicles offer final service as rescue trainers

/ Published Aug. 10, 2020
KHANDAHAR, Afghanistan, 
Defense Logistics Agency employees at Kandahar, Afghanistan, combined their roles of supporting the warfighter and ensuring the proper disposal of excess equipment to host recent field training for a local Air Force unit.

Marcus Wierman, site chief for DLA Disposition Services at Kandahar, said his team gave airmen from the 48th Rescue Squadron access to the facility July 31 to practice the cutting skills used for extractions during rescues by using the site’s excess vehicles.

“They used vehicles we would have cut up anyway,” Wierman said. “It was good training.”

Since the training occurred after normal working hours at the yard, Wierman said the airmen also had the chance to practice using their night vision equipment.

Material that is not needed by another unit and unserviceable is often offered by DLA Disposition Services sites for warfighters to use as aids to enhance training by adding variety and realism before the items involved are disposed of as scrap material. According to an Air Force website, the mission of the squadron includes training and equipping pararescuemen, combat rescue officers and supporting personnel ... to provide combat and humanitarian search, rescue and medical assistance in all environments.
499 P.2d 731

#### STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Jim W. TIDWELL, Appellant.

No. 1 CA-CR 384.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

Aug. 1, 1972.

Gary K. Nelson, Atty. Gen., by William P. Dixon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.

Jim W. Tidwell, in pro. per.

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellant, Jim W. Tidwell, represented by appointed counsel, plead guilty to obtaining money or property by bogus check in violation of A.R.S. § 13-311, a felony. He was sentenced to the state prison for a term of not less than four nor more than five years.

Appellant, *in propria persona,*has perfected an appeal to this court and the sole question on appeal is whether the sentence was excessive under the circumstances.

The record on appeal contained no evidence whatsoever of the basis for the imposition of sentence, thus making it impossible to properly evaluate the sentence. The record was ordered supplemented and a copy of the pre-sentence report was forwarded.

The record discloses that defendant has a history of bad check violations dating from 1955 to the present in a number of different states. Where a sentence is within the permissible statutory limits, it will not be modified or reduced on appeal unless it clearly appears excessive under the circumstances. State v. Leon, 104 Ariz. 297, 451 P.2d 878 (1969); State v. Bible, 104 Ariz. 346, 452 P.2d 700 (1969); State v. Fierro, 101 Ariz. 118, 416 P.2d 551 (1966).

In the case at bench, the court imposed a sentence within the statutory limits provided by A.R.S. § 13-311, and in light of the defendant’s history of bad check convictions there is no showing that the sentence was excessive nor that the trial court abused its discretion.

The judgment is affirmed.

KRUCKER, C. J, and HOWARD, J., concur.

NOTE: This cause was decided by the Judges of Division Two as authorized by A.R.S. § 12-120, subsec. E.
. 

### . Dote! June 17.

**201~**



### -- **~~ttenMaterials?Yes!Nu ,_**  **· ----------**  **:}{0~** "Q-;LL



### ~ t - · . 

### -~- **~--{;** \.- {)1\.



### ~v{ \ Name Organization Phon Number L ..

**--~- --~--~**  **~- ------~----~** 

**' uvnA•~**  

## E t · 2oL 

### )6?

**7c ~** 



### ~P 

# A: ___ __ __ _ __ **-- ~k~**  **~i-{-,-CZ0~q** 

### . eP 4 I 0( ()d - 3 .) - 9 (_ !

**{a _J**  $S?2 LJ

**~S"** 7; Db
#### Qualiayah J., Matter of (Taneka J.)

1st Dept: 149 AD3d 495

denied
#### People v Leeson

4th Dept: 148 AD3d 1677

denied*
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request

May 28, 1998.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 6, 1998 to 
be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: New.
    Form Number: None.
    Type of Review: New collection.
    Title: Simplified Tax and Wage Reporting System (STAWRS): Tax and 
Wage Reporting Survey.
    Description: This is a generical clearance for a level of customer 
interest survey and focus group interviews to reduce employer tax 
burden to be conducted over the next year.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 20 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other (one time only).
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 335 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-14782 Filed 6-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P