alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1.     | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Exchange Act; and                                                                  |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | 2.     | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Banco      Santander-Chile. |

|   |   | By:    | /s/ Oscar von Chrismar |                         |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------|------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Name:                  | Oscar      von Chrismar      |   |
|   |   |   |                   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |

|   |   | By:    | /s/ Guillermo Sabater |                         |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------|------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Name:                 | Guillermo      Sabater       |   |
|   |   |   |                  | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
#### Com. v. McElroy 24

04/13/2016

12 MAL (2016)

24

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 661
#### George, Matter of, v Neville

2d Dept: 143 AD3d 711

denied
Comments regarding the 

Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay 

(AMA)

John M. Brausch, Ph.D.

BASF Corporation

US EPA Science Advisory Panel Meeting – Tier 1

May 21-23, 2013
∗ Maintaining test concentrations most difficult performance 

criterion

∗ 7 of 18 studies did not maintain appropriate test concentrations

∗ Increased flows generally improved performance

∗ No guidance on incorporating difficult materials in feed

∗ Use of solvents presented additional issues

∗ Synchrony among tadpoles leading to tadpoles > Stage 60

∗ Occurred in 16 of 18 reviewed studies (4 with > 20% of control 

tadpoles)

∗ Reduced feed and increased flow generally helped

Difficulties with Performance Criteria
∗ Dose setting was very difficult

∗ Guidance indicates 1/3 of LC50 (maximum tolerated 

concentration)

∗ 12 of 18 studies non-thyroid dependent effect (Snoutvent length, body weight) 

∗ Lack of historical data on amphibians

∗ Necessitated a 96h Lc50 study to estimate high dose

∗ Prolonged range-finders were sometime necessary

∗ 1/10 of LC50 could be more appropriate

Complications of Dose Setting
∗ Most animal intense study requiring 8,000 – 16,000 

tadpoles

∗ Only 320 tadpoles needed for definitive study

∗ Cost of study is approx. $100,000

∗ Labor intensive and great degree of specialty needed

∗ 21 day study with minimum 4 day range finding study

Animal Usage, Cost, Time
∗ 12 of 16 thyroid studies (male/female pubertal, AMA) 

demonstrated thyroid activity

∗ 7 of 16 demonstrated thyroid activity in AMA

∗ Only 1 instance where AMA suggested thyroid activity 

that was not observed in pubertal rat assays

∗ Supported by Pickford et al. (2010)

∗ 5 pubertal studies observed activity when AMA did not

Detecting Thyroid Activity in the AMA
∗ Histopathology was most sensitive endpoint and 

specific for thyroid activity

∗ But, current decision tree only indicates needed for 

thyroid antagonists

∗ Only assay that examines developing thyroid

∗ Examines effects in an ecological receptor

∗ Incorporates multiple routes of exposure

∗ Could be important for compounds that get metabolized

∗ Ex. Gill uptake bypasses first-pass metabolism

Strengths of AMA
∗ Thyroid histopathology

∗ Stage matched thyroids

∗ Normalized Hind Limb Length

∗ Statistical analysis of NF Stage > 60 tadpoles

∗ Large amount of tissue remodeling/apoptosis

∗ Spinal curvature

∗ Appeared in 15 of 18 reviewed studies

∗ Diet is at least partially responsible

Limitations of AMA
∗ Staged-fixed design vs. time-fixed design

∗ Similar to proposed LAGDA

∗ 8d amphibian assay proposed by Tietge et al. (2010)

∗ Focuses primarily on biochemical endpoints

∗ 14d metamorphosis assay

∗ Initial EPA recommendation

Alternatives to AMA
∗ AMA did not significantly add to battery

∗ Rat pubertal identified 6 of 7 compounds that indicated 

thyroid activity in AMA 

∗ AMA not more sensitive than rat assays

∗ Definitive assessment cannot be made until all data is available

∗ Modifications of the study design could increase utility

∗ Eliminate growth issues, statistical issues, increase power for 

histology, greater sensitivity, etc.

Overall Conclusions
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joshua Rodriguez, Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 670]—

Judgment, *452Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered May 6, 2015, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-1088 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-005-AD

Helicopter Model: Robinson Helicopter Company Model R44 and R44 II Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 165 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended prevent the failure of the emergency floats to inflate 

during an emergency landing.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $850 to $955

Labor per Helicopter

(2.5 x $85/work-hour for 

the replacement)

$213

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $1,063 to $1,168

Total US Fleet Cost $175,395 to $192,720

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Venessa Stiger
LICENSE FOR THE RIGHT TO USE ENTRAILS

                          1  1  4  5  4
   ----------                                            ---------------
     SERIES                  NUMBER                       LICENSE  TYPE

is granted to "ZAURAL-NEFTEGAS LTD" in the person of

Director General ZHURAVLEV OLEG VENEDIKTOVICH with the purpose of

geological exploration of the PRIVOLNY ENTRAILS PARCEL with the object of

prospecting and estimation hydrocarbon deposits.

The parcel is located on the territory of MAKUSHINSK DISTRICT, KURGAN

PROVINCE.  Description of the parcel boundaries, its co-ordinates, toponymic

plans, profiles and other documents are given in APPENDICES ## 1, 2.

The right to use the ground parcel has been granted by ADMINISTRATION OF

MAKUSHINSK DISTRICT, letter dated 17.01.03 35.

The copies of the documents and the description of the parcel boundaries are

given in APPENDIX # 3

The parcel has a status of geological allocation.

The date of the license term is February 28, 2008

<PAGE>

THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE ESSENTIAL PARTS OF  THE LICENSE:

1.License agreement on the terms of the use of the Privolny parcel ,

Kurgan Province - 8 pp.

2. The layout of the Privolny parcel, geographic co-ordinates

of the critical points added - 1 p.

3. Makushinsk District Administration letter dated 17.01.03 35 - 1 p.

4. Kurgan Administration letter dated 16.12.02 01-1-655 - 1 p.

5. The Russian Ministry of Natural Resources Decree to grant the right of use

the Privolny parcel, Kurgan Province - 1 p.

6. The certificate of governmental registration of "Zaural-Neftegas Ltd" - 1 p.


Authorized  representative                          Authorized representative
of the Russian Ministry of                          of the Russian public
Natural Resources                                   authority of Federal Subject


 /s/ Sadovnik P.V.       Sadovnik P.V.
-----------------


                                Company executive
                                be granted the license


                               /s/ Zhuravlev O.V.       Zhuravlev O.V.
                                --------------

<PAGE>
No. 12-8878.

#### Pratt *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Free fitness program lasts through year’s end
 By Jeff Landenberger
  The Battle Creek Morale, Welfare and Recreation office is providing free employee access to Wellbeats, an online fitness provider that delivers on-demand classes, challenges, and fitness assessments to its subscribers anytime, anywhere. Martha Kerns, MWR fitness facility manager at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center, said Wellbeats offers more than 600 classes appropriate for all - from beginners to more advanced users. The classes include workouts for people with no access to fitness equipment. **MWR offers a free fitness option through the end of the year through Wellbeats an online fitness provider.




Image of flyer showing what Wellbeats offers in online fitness.
        Wellbeats
            MWR offers a free fitness option through the end of the year through Wellbeats an online fitness provider.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: MWR
                    
                    VIRIN: 200317-O-AA987-017**“Wellbeats has numerous videos, from one minute to 60 minutes, that I encourage you take advantage of,” said Robin Nichols, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 1626. “I have downloaded the app and each hour I turn on a one- to five-minute video to stretch, do deep breathing and de-stress. It is making a difference.” Kerns said while the program is currently free for DLA employees, they must first receive an access code to use Wellbeats from their local MWR where they are stationed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jess Deverow, Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 230]

Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered February 14, 2014, *551convicting him of robbery in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence, and (2) a resentence of the same court, imposed March 20, 2015. The appeal from the judgment brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the resentence is dismissed as academic.

Following a nonjury trial, the defendant was convicted of robbery in the third degree in connection with an incident in which he rode in an apartment building elevator with the complainant for nine floors, exited the elevator with the complainant, and then accosted the complainant in a deserted hallway, punching him in the face and stealing his jewelry.

At a suppression hearing, a police detective testified that the complainant confirmed that he and his attacker were depicted in a still photograph taken from a surveillance video of part of the underlying incident. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification evidence based on this testimony, as the complainant’s confirmation was not the product of an unduly suggestive police identification procedure. Rather, the complainant was merely ratifying the events he had personally experienced as depicted in the photo *(see People v Gee,*99 NY2d 158 [2002]; *People v Lara,*130 AD3d 463 [2015]; *People v Justice,*127 AD3d 786 [2015]; *Matter of Dashawn R.,*120 AD3d 1250 [2014]; *People v Cascio,*79 AD3d 1809 [2010]).

Similarly, the defendant’s contention that the trial testimony of the detective constituted improper inferential bolstering of the complainant’s identification of the defendant in violation of *People v Trowbridge*(305 NY 471 [1953]) is without merit *(see People v Jarvis,*127 AD3d 992 [2015]; *People v Brown,*120 AD3d 710 [2014]; *People v Totesau,*112 AD3d 977 [2013]; *People v Lassiter,*74 AD3d 1094 [2010]; *People v Moore,*159 AD2d 521 [1990]).

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the rights to present a defense and to confront an adverse witness by the trial court’s curtailment of his cross-examination regarding the complainant’s description of the assailant is unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Von Thaden,*108 AD3d 733 [2013]; *People v Valdez-Cruz,*99 AD3d 738 [2012]; *People v Haddock,*79 AD3d 1148 [2010]), and we decline to reach that contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

*552The defendant’s contentions regarding his March 20, 2015, resentence have been rendered academic by reason of his subsequent resentencing on August 23, 2016. Accordingly, we must dismiss the appeal from the March 20, 2015, resentence as academic.

Mastro, J.P., Sgroi, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.
#### East Ramapo Central School District, Appellant, v New York Schools Insurance Reciprocal, Respondent.

[51 NYS3d 427]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Stephen A. Bucaria, J.), entered February 5, 2014.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action (see *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the companion appeal and cross appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; *East Ramapo Cent. Sch. Dist. v New York Schs. Ins. Reciprocal,*150 AD3d 683 [2d Dept 2017] [decided herewith]).

Leventhal, J.P., Maltese, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicholas Moorman, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 9]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. Conviser, J. at hearing; Arlene D. Goldberg, J. at jury trial and sentencing), rendered December 11, 2014, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony, to a term of seven years, unanimously affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence. When, in a drug-prone area, an officer saw defendant holding a palm-sized plastic bag that the officer recognized from his experience as a possible container for drugs, and when, after the officer merely approached, defendant exhibited a startled expression and appeared to be hiding the bag, the officer had, at least, a founded suspicion of criminal activity warranting a common-law inquiry *(see People v Loretta,*107 AD3d 541 [1st Dept 2013], *lv denied*22 NY3d 1157 [2014]). The officer did not explicitly or implicitly demand that defendant surrender the bag, but only asked what was in it, leading defendant to open his hand and reveal the presence of drugs *(see People v*Carrasquillo, 54 NY2d 248, 253 [1981]; see *also People v Bora,*83 NY2d 531, 532-535 [1994]).

The hearing court, which suppressed defendant’s brief and limited statement made at the scene of the arrest as the product of a custodial interrogation, properly denied suppression of defendant’s subsequent statement given at the police station made after *Miranda*warnings following a pronounced break of at least four hours, as well as his subsequent statement made at the District Attorney’s office. Based on the totality of the relevant factors, we find that the statements were sufficiently attenuated from the suppressed statement *(see People v White,*10 NY3d 286, 291 [2008], *cert denied*555 US 897 [2008]; *People v Paulman,*5 NY3d 122, 130-131 [2005]).

Concur — Friedman, J.R, Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|No chart available.                                                                                  
|No chart available.                                                                                  
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Argentina (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     | W   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 105 / Tuesday, June 2, 1998 / Presidential Documents 30097

Executive Order 13087 of May 28, 1998

Further Amendment to Executive Order 11478, Equal

Employment Opportunity in the Federal Government

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the

laws of the United States, and in order to provide for a uniform policy

for the Federal Government to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 11478, as amended,

is further amended as follows:

Section 1. The first sentence of section 1 is amended by substituting ‘‘age,

or sexual orientation’’ for ‘‘or age’’.

Sec. 2. The second sentence of section 1 is amended by striking the period

[FR Doc. 98–14689

and adding at the end of the sentence ‘‘, to the extent permitted by law.’’.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

May 28, 1998.

œ–

Filed 6–1–98; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Gregory, Appellant.

[48 NYS3d 605]

Judgments, *590Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Condon, J.), rendered July 11, 2013, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.7

       The undersigned hereby appoints J. Peter Ricketts as his agent and
attorney-in-fact for the purpose of executing and filing all reports on Form
10-K relating to the year ending September 24, 1999, and any amendments
thereto, required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
Ameritrade Holding Corporation.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney
as of the 17th day of November, 1999.




/s/ Robert T. Slezak
--------------------
Robert T. Slezak, Director