alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 9:17 AM

To: 'sean@swift.aero'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for Additional Information: SWIFT Aero (Docket No. FAA-2015-3278)

August 17, 2015 

Dear Mr. Brown: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-3278). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by 

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and 

remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the 

requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by August 31, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 10.90  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29750-29751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing in the National Register were received by the National Park 
Service before May 23, 1998. Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR Part 
60 written comments concerning the significance of these properties 
under the National Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded to 
the National Register, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW, NC400, 
Washington, DC 20240. Written comments should be submitted by June 16, 
1998.
Carol D. Shull,
Keeper of the National Register.

California

San Diego County, Fleming, Guy and Margaret, House, 12279 Torrey Pines 
Park Rd., San Diego, 98000700

[[Page 29751]]

Torrey Pines Lodge, 12201 Torrey Pines Park Rd., San Diego, 98000699

Georgia

McDuffie County, Wrightsboro Historic District, Wrightsboro Rd., E. of 
Ridge Rd., Wrightsboro, 98000701

Louisiana

Plaquemines Parish, Woodland Plantation, 21997 LA 23, West Pointe a la 
Hache, 98000702

New Jersey

Gloucester County, Richardson Avenue School, Richardson Ave., 
Swedesboro Borough, 98000703
Monmouth County Sandy Hook Archeological Site, Gateway National 
Recreation Area, Address Restricted, Highlands vicinity, 98000704

New York

Saratoga County, Clifton Park Hotel, Old NY 146 and US 9, Clifton Park 
and Halfmoon, 98000705

North Carolina

Mecklenburg County, Blakeney, James A., House (Mecklenburg County MPS), 
Address Restricted, Providence vicinity, 98000706
Watauga County, Cove Creek High School, 207 Dale Adams Rd., Sugar 
Grove, 98000707

Wisconsin

Dane County, Cambridge Public School and High School, 103 South St., 
Cambridge, 98000708

[FR Doc. 98-14440 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
# Exit Interview with Land and Maritime Chief of Staff

/ Published June 19, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime will complete a changeover this month in its Chief of Staff position, a critical leadership component in ensuring successful daily operations. Outgoing Chief of Staff U.S. Air Force Col. Janette D. Ketchum is transitioning to her next command challenge as the pace of military moves picks up amid the COVID-19 environment.

Ketchum shared some experiences prior to her permanent change of station (see below):

**What were your thoughts when you heard about your DLA assignment and your thoughts/feelings after you arrived?**I was excited about my assignment to DLA Land and Maritime here in Columbus.  I’ve learned quite a lot about DLA and the fourth estate and I’m amazed with the scope of our mission and the caliber of our people...their dedication is admirable – they take “Warfighter First” to heart.

**Did you achieve most of your objectives and what was/were your most identifying achievement(s)?**As a team, we’ve accomplished quite a bit. We’ve worked to improve processes related to the recruiting, onboarding, training, managing, supervising, leading, caring for and developing of our workforce.  Recently, the COVID pandemic has presented us with a new set of challenges, which we have overcome.  The health and safety of personnel across DSCC while they perform their mission remains the top priority.

**Did you glean anything new to take to your next assignment?**I’m grateful for the great people I’ve met and worked with, as well as the deeper knowledge I’ve gained regarding the fourth estate writ large, DLA and its mission and the civilian personnel system. Most importantly, I’ve gained a broader perspective on leadership...Land and Maritime’s most senior leaders are second-to-none and I’m grateful and proud to have been a part of the Command Deck team!

**Next challenge?**I’m headed off to Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, DoD’s only tri-Service joint base to be the 87th Wing’s Mission Support Group Commander.
EXHIBIT 23



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLPHartford, Connecticut

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Statement No.
333-29515) concerning its Employee Savings Plan, Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Statement No. 333-29521) concerning its Union Employee Savings Plan and its Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration Statement No.33-38087-99)
concerning its Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan.

S/ Arthur Andersen LLP                 (ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP)

Hartford, Connecticut
December 10, 1999
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned,  Anthony J. Miceli, Chief Financial
Officer of United Capital Corp.,  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify,  with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report") that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

                           By: /s/ Anthony J. Miceli
                               ------------------------------
                               Anthony J. Miceli
                               Chief Financial Officer
                               May 12, 2004
```
# L_2011296EN.01005801.xml

| 15.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 296/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 296/58

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 9 November 2011

amending its Rules of Procedure

(2011/737/EU, Euratom)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 249 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Commission Decision 2010/138/EU, Euratom, of 24 February 2010 amending its Rules of Procedure (1),

Having regard to the Decision of the President of the Commission C(2011)8000 of 27 October 2011,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 12 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission, a new point 5 shall be added, worded as follows:

“5.   Any Member of the Commission wishing to suspend a written procedure in the field of coordination and surveillance of the economic and budgetary policies of the Member States, in particular of the euro area, shall send a reasoned request to that effect to the President, explicitly indicating the aspects of the draft decision to which it relates, based on an impartial and objective assessment of the timing, structure, reasoning or result of the proposed decision.

If the President considers that the reasons given are not well-founded, and if the request for suspension is maintained, he or she may refuse to allow the suspension and may decide that the written procedure shall continue; in that case, the Secretary-General shall ask the other Members of the Commission for their position to ensure that the quorum laid down in Article 250 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has been met. The President may also include the item on the agenda of the next Commission meeting with a view to its adoption.”

Article 2

In Article 23 of the Rules of Procedure of the Commission, a new point 5a shall be added, worded as follows:

“5a.   The Directorate-General responsible for economic and financial affairs must be consulted on all initiatives relating to or having a potential impact on growth, competitiveness or economic stability in the European Union or in the euro area.”

Article 3

This Decision shall take effect on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 November 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 55, 5.3.2010, p. 60.

1

---
No. 12-6799.

#### Ford *v.*McKesson (three judgments).

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-8841.

#### H. O. S. *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
161 A.3d 761

#### DOMENICK CATRAMBONE, PETITIONER-MOVANT, v. BALLY’S PARK PLACE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT SECOND INJURY FUND, INTERVENOR.

March 9, 2017

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for counsel fees is granted, in part, and counsel fees are awarded in the amount of $6,250.00; and costs are awarded in the amount of $117.75.
Exhibit 12.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Marcelo Canales Clariond, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Grupo Imsa, S.A. de C.V.



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: June 30, 2004



|       |  |                             
|------ |  | ----------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Marcelo Canales Clariond
|Name:  |  | Marcelo Canales Clariond    
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0001048 20-JUN-2013 10:00 AM
15


EXHIBIT 32.1











|                   |                                                          |  |  | 
|------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|                   |                                                          | 
|Date: May 14, 2009 | /s/ Joel Faden                                           | 
|                   | Joel Faden, Joel Faden & Company, Inc.                   | 
|                   | Chief Financial Individual
Providing accounting services | 
|                  




|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|* |  | The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash transactions and do not
include transactions that would be recorded in financial statements presented on the accrual basis
of accounting. The Trust is required to distribute all funds received after payment of expenses.
Accordingly, the Trust has not prepared any statements of financial condition or cash flows.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2073 Referred in House (RFH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2073

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 18, 1994

      Referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the United States courthouse that is scheduled to be 
constructed in Concord, New Hampshire, as the ``Warren B. Rudman United 
              States Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WARREN B. RUDMAN UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse that (as of the date of enactment of 
this Act) is scheduled to be constructed in Concord, New Hampshire, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Warren B. Rudman United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record, map, or other 
paper of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Warren B. Rudman United 
States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate August 17 (legislative day, August 11), 
      1994.

            Attest:

                                                MARTHA S. POPE,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Thompson v. Com.; Thompson, In re

08/10/2016

183 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 134 A.3d 172
2017-0325.

#### State ex rel. Williams v. Fifth Dist. Court of Appeals.

In Procedendo. On complaint in procedendo of Agatha Martin Williams. On S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 determination, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 252 ) ll-K - (I ) -6 5 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57AM

Sheet 252 of 325P. 2 

# A \ Pl A~(A II-K-(I)-6 5
CAPITA L AND OPERATING COST S O F PARTICULAT E CONTROL S O N COAL AN D OIL-FIRE D INDUSTRIAL BOILERS . PEDC o Environmental , Inc . Augus t 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-6 5
#### Beverly Hemmings, Appellant, v Leatrice Sutton, as Administratrix of the Estate of Percy Sutton, Deceased, Respondent.

[55 NYS3d 232]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry R. Ostrager, J.), entered December 17, 2015, dismissing with prejudice the complaint seeking to enforce a promissory note, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about September 30, 2015, which, after a bench trial, directed that judgment be entered in favor of defendant, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The trial court properly concluded that the note plaintiff sought to enforce was void due to a lack of consideration *(see*
      *458UCC 3-408; *Samet v Binson,*122 AD3d 710, 711 [2d Dept 2014]). Plaintiff testified that the note was given in exchange for past economic, technological, and financial assistance, but failed to submit any documentary evidence of such work. The trial court found the claim to be not credible, and that finding is entitled to deference on appeal *(see Matter of Metropolitan Transp. Auth.,*86 AD3d 314, 320 [1st Dept 2011]; *see also New Media Holding Co. L.L.C. v Kagalovsky,*118 AD3d 68, 78 [1st Dept 2014]).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Richter, Feinman, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Janet Lister , Appellant

No. 06

- 21

- 00115

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 188th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 50688

- A ). Memorandum Opinion d elivered by Justice Stevens

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice van Cleef participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opi nion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the clerk ’s bill of costs and the judgment of

convi ction by striking the assessment of attorney fees in the amount o f $ 2 ,465 .00

. As modified, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Janet Lister , has adequately indicated h er inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.
RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2022 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk