alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      9

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        5,375,856
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        4,034,076
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                      0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  59,350,399
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                  0
<LOANS>                                     212,053,930
<ALLOWANCE>                                   3,297,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              292,305,471
<DEPOSITS>                                  234,617,995
<SHORT-TERM>                                  1,318,340
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           7,606,103
<LONG-TERM>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     48,719,393
<OTHER-SE>                                       43,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              292,305,471
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              19,261,766
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             3,867,259
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             23,129,025
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            9,379,641
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            9,979,063
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        13,149,962
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   120,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              257,145
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              10,254,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               5,648,859
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    5,648,859
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  5,648,859
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .91
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.69
<LOANS-NON>                                     567,345
<LOANS-PAST>                                          0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                      0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 176,087
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              3,364,588
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   265,384
<RECOVERIES>                                     78,052
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             3,297,256
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          3,297,256
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                               0


</TABLE>
# Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month Spotlight: Khoa Nguyen

/ Published May 17, 2019

May is Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month – a celebration of Asians and Pacific Islanders in the United States and a way to pay tribute to the generations who have enriched America’s history and are instrumental in its future success. In this series of stories, we honor Asian or Pacific Islander Defense Logistics Agency Energy employees. 

**My name is:**  Khoa Nguyen

**I am:**Administrative Support Assistant for the DLA Energy South-West Pacific team, and I am Vietnamese.

**Describe your job in a sentence:** I perform office support related duties including personnel actions, correspondence, filing, copying and travel review. 

**How long have you worked at DLA Energy?** Five years.

**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA Energy?** The Pacific team is thoroughly professional and supportive.

**What are your best memories of working here?** I enjoy the challenges associated with learning and understanding DLA policies and procedures to ensure full and correct administrative support is provided to the DLA Energy South-West Pacific team.

**How do you make a difference?** As administrative support, I assist team personnel in filing travel requests and vouchers, submitting Aircraft and Personnel Automated Clearance System requests, and performing collateral duties in the areas of safety, key control, office management and physical security.

**What is the one thing you’d like others to know about your heritage?** As an Asian, I take my job seriously and do my best to ensure my co-workers and chain of command appreciate my efforts and that my performance always reflects positively of Asian Americans overall.

**Why is it important to you that we celebrate Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month?** Celebrating Asian and Pacific Islander heritage shows an appreciation of our various ethnicities, an understanding of our shared history, and recognition of our similarities despite our diverse cultures.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7938

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ORLANDOUS L. MAYE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-99-104, CA-01-1507-AM) Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Orlandous L. Maye, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Joseph Krysa, David Hackney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We note that, although Maye states that he raised a claim of error under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), in his petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court after the dismissal of his first § 2255 motion, he has not made an Apprendi claim in this proceeding. 2 PER CURIAM: Orlandous Maye seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. * United States v. Maye , Nos. CR-99-104; CA-01-1507-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
164 A.3d 401

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LAMONT BOYD, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

March 16, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of ALLTELCorporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, Scott T. Ford, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Scott T. Ford                     |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Scott T. Ford                         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| November 5, 2004                      |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to ALLTEL Corporation and will be retained by ALLTEL Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Aquila, Inc.**

**Chief Accounting Officer**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

|   | I, Beth A. Armstrong, certify that: |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

 

|   | 1. | Aquila, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2008 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aquila, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: May 7, 2008

 

|   | /s/ Beth A. Armstrong |
|--------|-----------------------|

|   | Beth A. Armstrong |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | Senior Vice President and |
|--------|---------------------------|

Chief Accounting Officer 

Aquila, Inc.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PR ECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Anthony C. Odom, Appellant,

v.

Alan Wilson, in his official capacity as Attorney General
of the State of South Carolin a, J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., Barry Barnett, and Christina T. Adams, in their official capacities as South Carolina Circuit Solicitors, Respondents.

Appellate Case No. 2012-210914

Appeal from Spartanburg County J. Derham Cole, Ci rcuit Court Judge

Mem orandum Opinion No. 2013-MO-022 Heard June 6, 2013 – Filed July 17, 2013

AFFIRMED

Tina L. M. Young, of Aiken, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Deputy Attorney General J. Emory Smith, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondents.PER CURIAM: Anthony Odom sued Attorn ey General Alan Wilson and
all sixteen South Carolina solicitors in their official capacities seeking inter alia injunctive and declaratory relief to prevent the State fro m prosecuting him on charges of solicitation of a minor in Ocon ee County. The circuit court dismissed the case, finding it lacked jurisdiction to enjoin an ongoing criminal prosecution. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Herron v. Century BMW , 395 S.C. 461, 465, 719 S.E.2d 640, 642 (2012) ("Issue preservation rules are designed to give the trial court a fair opportunity to rule on the issues, and thus provide us with a plat form for meaningful appellate review."); I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant , 338 S.C. 406, 422, 526 S.E.2d 716, 724 (2000) ("If the losing party has raised an i ssue in the lower court, but the court fails to rule upon it, the party must file a mo tion to alter or amend the judgment in order to preserve the issue for appellate review.").

AFFIRMED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY , KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ.,

concur.
# Annual summit fosters acquisition excellence

/ Published June 26, 2019
Lorton, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency Acquisition hosted its annual Fifth Estate Chief Contracting Officer Summit and senior procurement executive visit for DLA’s acquisition workforce in Lorton, Virginia, June 25-26. 

The forum focuses on advancing acquisition oversight and support with continuous process improvements throughout the Fifth Estate community, which implements procurement systems, policies and regulations.  

DLA Acquisition Deputy Director Roxanne Banks oversees DLA’s Fifth Estate organizations. They are: DLA Contracting Support Office, DLA Distribution, DLA Disposition Services, DLA Strategic Materials and the Joint Contingency Acquisition Support Office.

Only 5% of DLA’s acquisitions involve service contracts, Banks said, but they are no less important than other contracts. 

“We have two components to our operations in DLA. We have the material side, which is all our supply buys...,” she said. “And we have our internal operating costs, which are a part and a component of what feeds into our cost recovery rate. Service acquisition contracts feed into that.”

Banks stressed the importance of keeping operating costs down and following audit practices. She also mentioned the success of industry management courses at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Virginia, and the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Before introducing guest speaker Robert Clarke from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for acquisition, Banks reviewed the roles and accomplishments of the Fifth Estate organizations. 

“What you do individually from an organizational standpoint is nothing to sneeze at. It’s just amazing what we’re all able to accomplish,” she said.
1

From:

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 8:58 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Protect our Water from Jet Fuel

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

I am horrified to think that this agreement aggravates the chances that I, my neighbors, and my fellow Hawaii 

residents will be exposed to toxic water leaking from Navy storage tanks in Red Hill. 

Twenty-five years is far. far too long to wait before acting to save our most precious resource. If the leaks 

cannot be fixed within a year at most, then the tanks must be emptied. 

It would be only fair to extend the public comment period on the negotiated agreement between the U.S. Navy, 

Environmental Protection Agency, and Hawaii Department of Health be extended to allow the public to 

understand and weigh-in on this important issue. 

Please continue to keep me informed in this decision-making process. 

Thank you.
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 3,666  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Fw: USGS Data From Forest Service Uses ::: parts per trillion level.......Fw: 

POCIS pesticide sampling

Jack Faulk to: Jordan Page, Virginia Garelick, Jennifer Chan, 

Allison Wiedeman, Marietta Echeverria 10/16/2009 04:04 PM

fyi...

Jack

Water Permits Division

US Environmental Protection Agency

EPA East (4203M)

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Telephone (202) 564-0768

Fax (202) 564-6431

----- Forwarded by Jack Faulk/DC/USEPA/US on 10/16/2009 04:01 PM -----

From: Teung.F.Chin@aphis.usda.gov

To: Jack Faulk/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Harold.Coble@ars.usda.gov, Benjamin.Smallwood@usda.gov, glenn.carpenter@wdc.usda.gov, 

Alan.V.Tasker@aphis.usda.gov, Linda.Abbott@usda.gov, Robert.M.Baca@aphis.usda.gov, 

sotoole@aphis.usda.gov, Charles.L.Brown@aphis.usda.gov, Samantha.B.Floyd@aphis.usda.gov, 

Stephanie.H.Stephens@usda.gov, Arnet Jones/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Sally.Schneider@ars.usda.gov, Daniel.Strickman@ARS.USDA.GOV

Date: 10/02/2009 03:57 PM

Subject: USGS Data From Forest Service Uses::: parts per trillion level.......Fw: POCIS pesticide sampling

Jack:

I am forwarding a USGS memo on a study assessing a new analytical approach to assess herbicide risk 

to bull trout. Table 11 lists the observed herbicide concentrations in the test stream following 

applications in five national forests in 2007 and 2008. The observed concentrations were at very low 

levels, even parts per trillion, as a result of the IPM-approach emplyed by the Forest Service. The new 

analytical method closely matched those of coventional analytical techniques.

Teung

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or comments.

Best regards,
Teung

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Teung F. Chin, Ph.D.

Acting Director 

Office of Pest Management Policy

Agricultural Research Service

United States Department of Agriculture

LOCATED AT: 

1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Room 3871 - South Bldg. Mail Stop 0315

Washington DC, 20250-0315

Phone (202) 720-5375 Fax (202) 720-3191

Teung.F.Chin@usda.gov

http://www.ars.usda.gov/opmp

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

----- Forwarded by Teung F Chin/MD/APHIS/USDA on 10/02/2009 03:42 PM -----

"scovell@fs.fed.us" <scovell@fs.fed.us>

10/01/2009 12:19 PM

To "Teung.F.Chin@aphis.usda.gov" <Teung.F.Chin@aphis.usda.gov>

cc

Subject POCIS pesticide sampling

Teung:

Attached for forwarding to EPA, as you see fit, is USGS paper which includes some sample results of 

POCIS pesticide sampling:

See, especially, Table 11.

V/R

Steve

Stephen A. Covell, A.I.C.P.

Biological Scientist / Program Manager

USFS Pesticides and

State and Private Forestry Invasive Plants 

USDA / Forest Service / Forest Health Protection

RPC-7

1601 North Kent Street

Arlington, VA 22209

Tel: 703-605-5342

FAX: 703-605-5353
e-mail: scovell@fs.fed.us

web site: www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edwin Mendez, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 55]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered January 29, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the voluntariness of his plea do not fall within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement *(see People v Conceicao,*26 NY3d 375, 381-382 [2015]), and we decline to review these unpreserved claims in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits.

The court sufficiently advised defendant of his rights under *Boykin v Alabama*(395 US 238 [1969]), notwithstanding that it omitted the word “jury” from its reference to the right to a trial *(see People v Williams,*137 AD3d 706 [1st Dept 2016], *lv denied*27 NY3d 1141 [2016]).

In addition, under the circumstances of this case, the court was not required to inquire into the existence of a possible agency defense. In the course of making an application for a more lenient sentence, defense counsel stated, “What we have here is a user, offering or doing a favor to another user, potentially, if the People’s case is true in this case.” Counsel’s statement was merely speculation about what the People’s proof might show at trial rather than a statement for which “[defendant] was . . . the source of the information” *(see People v Moye,*11 AD3d 212, 212 [1st Dept 2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 766 [2005]). Accordingly, we find that this was not a situation “where the defendant’s recitation of the facts . . . clearly casts significant doubt upon the defendant’s guilt or otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea” *(People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]; *see also People v Mox,*20 NY3d 936, 938 [2012], quoting *People v Serrano,*15 NY2d 304, 308 [1965] *556[“the requisite elements should appear from the defendant’s own (factual) recital”]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.