alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Leaders virtually examine DLA Energy organizational strategy

/ Published Sept. 14, 2020

Communicating virtually from the four corners of the globe, Defense Logistics Agency Energy directors, commanders, and deputies participated in a Commander’s Strategic Offsite Sept. 8-9.

DLA Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Jimmy Canlas and Deputy Commander Eric Smith used Microsoft Teams to collaborate in real time to relook the DLA Energy organizational strategy.

“Our offsite focused on three deliverables: approve a new mission statement, a new vision statement, and relook our organizational strategy,” Canlas said. “We needed to examine our mission and vision since they haven’t changed since at least 2008.” 

DLA Vice Director Mike Scott provided opening remarks and insight, shaping many of the discussions over the next two days. 

“Our goal was to ensure our statements reflect the National Defense Strategy and that they resonate internally with the Energy team as well as our external customers,” Canlas said.  

DLA Energy deputy directors facilitated each of the three teams managing the conversation and driving goals. DLA Finance Energy Deputy Director Joe Wilburn, DLA Energy Strategic Policy & Programs Deputy Director Cindy Smith and DLA Energy Americas Deputy Director Jason Exum helped keep the three teams working independently and on track to formulate the final product.

Technology helped bridge the interpersonal communication gap despite time zones and remote locations. A virtual social hour on the first day offered leaders a chance to chat openly and get to know one another since many never get a chance to meet in person. 

Efforts over the two-day offsite produced new mission and vision statements and a list of deliverables due over the next 60 days. 

The new mission statement is to enable mission readiness by providing globally resilient energy solutions to the Warfighter and Whole of Government. The new vision statement is to be the trusted leader in innovative energy solutions aligned with the speed of change.

“Our new DLA Energy mission and vision statement captures our aspiration to earn and retain the trust of our customers,” Canlas said. “The ink is still drying, but we are calling this a huge win for our team as we were able to capture where we want to go in the future.”
No. 12-8292.

No. 12-8869.

#### In re Bhat; and In re Burress.

Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements File Nos. 333-52953, 333-83823, 333-82775, 333-35950, 333-60903 and 333-88142 ofMetro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. included in this Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

April 2, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vance I. Jackson, Appellant.

[55 NYS3d 338]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), rendered February 8, 2011, convicting him of burglary in the first degree (four counts), robbery in the first degree (three counts), assault in the first degree (three counts), assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and *1026imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to the police. The defendant’s statements, which were made at the police precinct, were spontaneous and not the result of interrogation or its functional equivalent. A detective merely introduced himself, an act that was not reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response *(see People v Rivers,*56 NY2d 476, 480 [1982]; *People v Ziegler,*78 AD3d 545 [2010]; *People v Jefferson,*71 AD3d 694 [2010]).

At the trial, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in qualifying an individual as an expert in the field of “primer examiner gunshot residue analysis” based on her academic training and experience *(see People v Battease,*124 AD2d 807, 809 [1986]; *People v Donaldson,*107 AD2d 758, 759 [1985]). The court also providently exercised its discretion in giving an expanded readback of the testimony of a police detective in order to provide a complete response to the jury’s inquiry (s*ee People v Malloy,*55 NY2d 296 [1982]; *People v Grant,*127 AD3d 990, 990-991 [2015]; *People v Garcia,*56 AD3d 271, 272 [2008]; *People v Perez,*15 AD3d 284 [2005]; *People v Gil,*258 AD2d 595, 596 [1999]).

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by certain statements made by the prosecutor during summation is without merit. The prosecutor’s statements, for the most part, constituted fair comment on the evidence and the inferences to be drawn therefrom *(see People v Fuhrtz,*115 AD3d 760 [2014]; *People v Birot,*99 AD3d 933 [2012]; *People v McHarris,*297 AD2d 824, 825 [2002]), or were fair response to defense counsel’s comments during summation *(see People v Adamo,*309 AD2d 808, 810 [2003]; *People v Clark,*222 AD2d 446, 447 [1995]), and any improper statements were not so flagrant or pervasive as to deny the defendant a fair trial *(see People v Almonte,*23 AD3d 392, 394 [2005]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, 85-86 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Dillon, J.P., Roman, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 20.02  | 9.19   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# New commander serves as face of DLA support to EUCOM, AFRICOM 

/ Published June 27, 2019
KAISERSLAUTERN, Germany, 
The new commander of Defense Logistics Agency Europe & Africa will serve as the entry point for DLA’s warfighter support to U.S. European Command and U.S. Africa Command. 

“You are it ... the single commander and the single DLA face to those customers,” Air Force Maj. Gen. Allan Day, DLA Logistics Operations director, told Army Col. Krista Hoffman during a change of command ceremony June 26 in Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Hoffman took command from Army Col. Theodore Shinkle and will support customers with “the power of DLA’s nine supply chains,” Day said.

DLA Europe & Africa’s support covers 55.8 million square miles and 104 nations, and includes food, fuel, repair parts, construction materials and medical supplies, as well as distribution and disposition services. 

The regional command’s more than 700 service members, civilian employees and local nationals have “earned not only a reputation for on-time delivery of goods and services, but also for being a ready and responsive mission enabler,” Day said.

Shinkle said DLA Europe & Africa works with combatant commands to “achieve readiness effects together.”

“It’s been an absolute privilege to share in that mission,” said Shinkle, who will go to Army Materiel Command in Huntsville, Alabama. “I take great pride by simply being associated with what this workforce has done.”

Hoffman previously served as deputy commander for the DLA regional command serving U.S. CENTCOM & SOCOM. She also commanded DLA Distribution Europe in Germesheim, Germany, from 2014-2016. 

She noted how much DLA Europe & Africa has evolved since her last DLA assignment in Germany. 

“It’s really something to see how far this organization has progressed,” she said, “not just in relevance but also in criticality in meeting current mission requirements and setting the EUCOM and AFRICOM theaters for future missions.”
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                                                   
|No chart available.                                                                                   
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     | W   |     |     |     |     | W   |    
|2024                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | W   |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Decided January 5, 2017

#### Broomfield, Matter of, v Evans

2d Dept: 140 AD3d 748

denied
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 21

- 00059

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 2004

- 14056

Style: Dornice Hart

v Ciandra Jackson

Date motion filed * : November 9, 2021

Type of motion: Motion for Rehearing En Banc

Party filing motion: App ellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Co urt will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

_____________________________________

Judge's signature : /s / Sherry Radack

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower , Countiss, Rivas

- Molloy,

and Guerra , and Farris

.

Date: December 9, 2021
# DLA Troop Support bids farewell to two retiring civilians

/ Published Nov. 25, 2019
Philadelphia, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support bid farewell to two civilian employees during a retirement ceremony Nov. 25 in Philadelphia.

Sheila Taylor, from the Military Personnel office, retired after 36 years of service. Carolyn Dempsey, who worked in the Subsistence supply chain, retired after serving 31 years.

DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Gavin Lawrence presided over the ceremony and congratulated the new retirees on their combined 67 years of service to the federal government.

“This is a historic day,” Lawrence said. “Not only because this is the first official ceremony we’re doing in the Command conference room in [the brand new] Building 45, but it’s also historic because we have been given the great fortune and honor of recognizing and saying farewell to two outstanding Americans that have served with the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support over a number of years.”

Lawrence presented Taylor and Dempsey with certificates of retirement, DLA Troop Support mementos, and Commander’s coins.

Taylor began her career in 1983 at the Defense Personnel Support Center, starting as a payroll clerk. She retired as a management assistant in the Military Personnel office. During her time with Troop Support, one of Taylor’s biggest accomplishments was changing the way the agency purchased paper products through small businesses.

“There’s so many people that have had an impact on my want and need to do the best job possible,” Taylor said. “You have played a role in my life, and it has changed for the better. I will always remember all of you.”

Dempsey worked in the private sector for 13 years before joining DLA Troop Support in January 1988 as an analyst in the Subsistence supply chain. She has been a food technologist in the supply chain for the last 30 years. One of her career highlights was consistently providing solutions to challenging food-based questions and issues.

“Thank you to everyone who has been there with me over the years: those that I just got to know, [and] those that are gone,” Dempsey said.
*June 7, 2017*

2017-Ohio-4159.]

2016-1394.

#### Johnson v. Shaker Hts. Mun. Court.

In Mandamus. This case is returned to the regular docket under S.Ct.Prac.R. 19.01. Respondent shall file a response to the complaint within 21 days.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Furnished Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Schumann, Senior Vice PresidentFinance and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/    Eric Schumann                      
|------------------------------------------
|Name:    Eric Schumann                    
|Title:      Senior Vice PresidentFinance 
|Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer
|Date:      August 14, 2003                



A signed original of this statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. and will be retained by Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 10, 2006
    
    /s/ DAVID E. MEADORDavid E. Meador
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Price of Corpus Christi,TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Netherlands (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Price of Corpus Christi,TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Netherlands (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 4.07  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4.87   | 6.85   | 16.21  | 6.68   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Com. v. Mattern30

02/02/2016

841 MAL (2015)

30

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 69
#### Semen Gorokhovskiy, Appellant, v NYU Hospitals Center, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 646]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings *967County (Silber, J.), dated April 21, 2016, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

The plaintiff, in his capacity as a delivery person for nonparty FDR Services Corporation, allegedly was injured while trying to push a four-wheeled bin of floor mats up a ramp in the loading dock area of NYU Langone Medical Center in Manhattan. The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries against the defendant, the alleged owner of the premises at the time of the subject accident. The plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that the ramp was improperly sloped—i.e., it was too steep, high, and long, and “unnecessarily exposed [him] to forces greater and longer in duration than what are customary for ramps used for deliveries.” The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Supreme Court granted the motion. We reverse.

In a premises liability case, a defendant property owner, or a party in possession or control of real property, wbo moves for summary judgment has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing that it neither created the alleged defective condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence *(see Kyte v Mid-Hudson Wendico,*131 AD3d 452, 453 [2015]; *Pampalone v FBE Van Dam, LLC,*123 AD3d 988 [2014]; *Dhu v New York City Hous. Auth.,*119 AD3d 728 [2014]; *Kruger v Donzelli Realty Corp.,*111 AD3d 897, 898 [2013]; *Bravo v 564 Seneca Ave. Corp.,*83 AD3d 633, 634 [2011]; *see also Monastiriotis v Monastiriotis,*141 AD3d 510 [2016]). “[W]hether a dangerous or defective condition exists on the property of another so as to create liability depends on the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case and is generally a question of fact for the jury” *(Trincere v County of Suffolk,*90 NY2d 976, 977 [1997] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Nagin v K.E.M. Enters., Inc.,*111 AD3d 901 [2013]).

Here, the defendant failed to demonstrate, prima facie, that the subject ramp was compliant with the 2008 New York City Building Code (Administrative Code of City of NY, tit 28, ch 7) §§ BC 1010.2 and 1010.4, and was not a dangerous condition on the date of the subject accident. Furthermore, the defendant failed to demonstrate, prima facie, that it did not have notice of the alleged condition, or that the alleged condition was open and obvious and not inherently dangerous. Since the defendant failed to demonstrate its prima facie entitlement to judgment *968as a matter of law, we need not consider the plaintiff’s opposition papers *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Leventhal, J.P., Hall, Hinds-Radix and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.