alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Alonzo R., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Stephanie R., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 283]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sarah P. Cooper, J.), entered on or about April 8, 2016, to the extent it brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about April 8, 2016, which found that respondent mother had neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the fact-finding order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition.

A preponderance of the evidence shows that the mother neglected the child by permitting the child to live in the home of a person she had never met and whose full name and address were unknown to her; failing to provide that person with documentation necessary for the child to receive dental treatment; failing to provide the child with financial support; and failing to act after learning that the child was homeless for several months *(see*Family Ct Act §§ 1012 [f] [i] [A], [B]; 1046 [b] [i]; *Matter of Kimberly F. [Maria F.],*146 AD3d 562 [1st Dept 2017], *lv denied*29 NY3d 902 [2017]; *Matter of Joelle T. [Laconia W.],*140 AD3d 513, 513-514 [1st Dept 2016]). The mother’s conduct and the testimony of the caseworkers demonstrated her clear intention to abdicate her parental responsibilities, despite her claims of illness and poverty *(see Kimberly F.,*146 AD3d at 563; *Joelle T.,*140 AD3d at 514).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.
# 8th CES repairs Kunsan’s runway in record time

/ Published May 2, 2019
KUNSAN AIR BASE, Republic of Korea, 
Members of the 8th Civil Engineer Squadron, also known as the Legendary Red Devils, rapidly repaired a rupture on Kunsan Air Base’s active runway in record time from May 1 to May 2, 2019.At approximately 9 a.m. on May 1st, a rupture was discovered on Kunsan’s runway and Col. John Bosone, 8th Fighter Wing commander, immediately suspended all military and civilian flying operations to ensure the safety and security of people and assets. He also directed an investigation into the cause of the rupture.“This is a pretty non-standard occurrence,” said Maj Alyson Busch, 8th CES operations flight commander. “We had to take our time and figure out the fastest and safest course of action not only for the U.S. Air Force, but also our Korean partners and civilian airframes and personnel.”An engineering assessment is normally a lengthy process that includes a contract repair. Since this rupture affected an active runway, the 8th CES used Rapid Airfield Damage Repair (RADR) techniques to replace the pavement immediately.“RADR is a new capability for the Air Force and the 8th CES has been training on it constantly,” said Busch. “After evaluating the cause, we determined this was the best option to repair the runway in a timely manner.”A thorough analysis determined the rupture was seven feet by eight feet on the surface and four feet deep and caused by water erosion over the years.“This was important to fix because it is a safety hazard,” said Airman 1st Class Curtis Carroll, 8th CES pavement and construction journeyman. “Planes come and land all the time and we wouldn’t want an incident where if an aircraft lands, it just caves in completely.”In a matter of hours, a 30-member team comprised of Airmen from the 8th CES and 8th Logistics Readiness Squadron worked through the night to repair the rupture through excavation, compacting and placing rapid-set concrete.The rapid-set concrete cured in a few hours. It typically takes 7 to 28 days for concrete to dry through the traditional repair method; however, RADR techniques expedited the process and enabled the runway to open in record time.“The quick repair of the runway was the first use of RADR on a primary runway outside an active combat zone, and this capability has now proven incredibly important in both wartime and peacetime,” said Lt Col John Conner, 8th Civil Engineer Squadron Commander. “The Red Devil Engineers proved once again why they are legendary for readiness, expertise, and work ethic.”*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Kunsan Air Base website.*
# How to find out about changes in DSCR operating status during inclement weather, other emergencies

/ Published Aug. 17, 2020
Richmond, Va. , 
When Hurricane Isaias was forecasted to bring heavy rain and damaging winds to the metro Richmond area Aug. 4, Defense Supply Center Richmond leadership made the decision to close center to everyone except those deemed essential in anticipation of the storm.

How did you find out the center was closed?

There are several ways center employees can find out about changes in the installation’s operating status during inclement weather and other emergencies. If there are any changes in operating status during inclement weather (i.e. delayed openings, closures), the home page of the DLA Aviation public website will display a change in operating status. Employees can also call the DSCR Information/Hazardous Weather Hotline at (804) 279-3599.

Richmond area television stations (WTVR 6, WRIC 8 and WWBT 12) also run installation delays or closure announcements both on-air and on their webpages.

Employees can be notified of changes in DSCR operating status on their mobile or home numbers, text or personal email by signing up for the AtHoc computer-based emergency notification system (available for common-access card holders who are current DLA employees). To make sure personal information is up-to-date, log into AtHoc, which can be found on each employees’ desktop applications or by clicking on the “show hidden icons” bar on the bottom of your computer screen. Once AtHoc opens, click on “Access Self Service” to review and/or update email addresses and contact numbers.

An Emergency Notification Guide outlines all the methods listed above to remain aware of changes to the installation’s operational status.
#### D.A.C. v. J.E.H.

08/17/2016

237 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 602
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED


2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


1.            Section 3 of the Iron Mountain Incorporated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”) is amended by deleting the number “3,352,543” and inserting therefor “8,352,543.” 


 


2.            Except as hereinabove amended, the provisions of the 2002 Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”) of NovAtel Inc., I,Werner Gartner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, ofNovAtel Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  such Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in such Report fairly represents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of NovAtel Inc.

 

 
| May 26, 2004 |                                                 | /s/ WERNER GARTNER |   |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
| Date         | Werner Gartner                                       |
|         | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
WRP gives agency 64 chances to hire college students, recent grads
 
  By Beth Reece
              DLA Troop Support Analytical Product Test Center DLA Aviation         DLA Troop Support Pacific DLA Disposition Services
# Keeping up with the conditions: 726th EABS Vehicle Maintenance

/ Published Nov. 15, 2019
CAMP LEMONNIER, Djibouti , 
Whether it is a tanker truck fueling aircraft or a forklift transporting cargo, vehicles are a key component to any Air Force mission. In East Africa, harsh weather conditions, rugged terrain and consistent use takes a toll on these vehicles, and when issues arise, it is time to call the mechanics.The 726th Expeditionary Air Base Squadron Vehicle Maintenance mechanics service and repair more than 140 Air Force vehicles in the Horn of Africa area of responsibility.Just two Airmen and three contractors sustain a fleet of passenger vehicles, forklifts, ambulances, cranes and many other types of equipment.The 726th EABS Vehicle Maintenance’s primary shop is located at Camp Lemonnier, but they maintain vehicles in multiple locations including Chabelley Airfield located roughly 30 minutes away.At the airfield, the team services critical assets such as fuel trucks and emergency vehicles that could slow or stop the mission if a breakdown occurs.“Right now we’re sitting at around 90 percent for mission critical vehicles,” said Tech. Sgt. James Hopper, 726th EABS Vehicle Maintenance flight chief deployed from the 7th Logistics Readiness Squadron at Dyess Air Force Base, Texas. “We’ve really worked hard to get the fleet where it needs to be, and we still have plenty of time to do some more work. I would love to get it up to 100 percent.”Hopper’s right-hand Airman, Staff Sgt. Jared Agey deployed as the 726th EABS Vehicle Maintenance NCO in-charge from the 27th Special Operations Logistics Readiness Squadron at Cannon AFB, New Mexico.As a general purpose mechanic at his home station, Agey had never worked on some of the vehicles he does while deployed. Equipment like the R11 refueling truck and the P19 Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting vehicle typically require a specialty mechanic because of the complex systems onboard.“Learning about those vehicles has been the best part of the job,” said Agey. “I really like the trouble-shooting aspect. We diagnose our problem, find the root cause and then figure out how to fix it.”While these Airmen have proved they are capable of keeping these vehicles rolling, the need for more manpower has been noticed, and during the next deployment rotation the two Airmen mechanic positions will increase to six.“It’s going to be great,” said Hopper. “More personnel will mean two mechanics can be at Chabelley at all times, which will significantly cut down on response time for emergency maintenance.”More Airmen in the shop will also allow the mechanics to focus more on preventive rather than reactionary maintenance, reducing the amount of potential breakages.Entrusted with the maintenance of a fleet worth 15 million dollars and improving the capability rate of critical equipment to more than 90 percent, the 726th EABS Vehicle Maintenance shop proves their ability to keep the mission rolling, despite the grueling conditions the vehicles under their care are exposed to every day.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 435th Air Expeditionary Wing website.*
# Engaging with industry

/ Published Aug. 14, 2019

Networking with industry representatives was the highlight of the second annual Defense Logistics Agency Industry Day at the McNamara Headquarter Complex, July 31.

The Industry Day event’s theme was “Taking it to the Next Level: Partnering with Industry to Improve Warfighter Readiness.”

DLA Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Albert Miller hosted two breakout sessions to talk about DLA Energy opportunities and encourage industry feedback about doing business with DLA Energy. Eleven companies representing the oil and gas, renewable energy, and utility services sectors attended the breakout sessions.

“We want to maintain an innovative edge through industry engagement,” Miller said. “There are over $12 billion business opportunities in DLA Energy. In fiscal year 2018, we purchased more than $10.1 billion in energy services and commodities of which $6.7 billion was eligible for small businesses.”

Representatives from DLA Energy Supplier Operations Directorate, Small Business Programs, Quality Technical Directorate, Supply Chain Management, Business Process Support, and the Procurement Policy Support Directorate participated in each breakout session.

Director of Supplier Operations Gabby Earhardt explained that the breakout sessions and networking sessions were a result of feedback from the DLA Energy 2019 Worldwide Energy Conference. Industry suppliers called for more interaction and information. 

“The three focus areas derived from supplier feedback were ease in bidding, timely resolution and pre- and post-award effectiveness,” Earhardt said. “This is our way to make doing business easier.”

Energy industry representatives were appreciative of the opportunities to interact with DLA Energy personnel.

“This event offered the opportunity to meet new faces and it’s been very helpful,” said Wallace Stephens, president and chief executive officer of SteedPetro, a U.S. veteran own business. “There’s a genuine effort to include industry in the collaborative process of sourcing goods and services and in partnering from the private sector and small businesses in particular.”

DLA Energy is exploring new ways to further partnering with industry. A DLA Energy Supplier Advocacy Council is being discussed as well as the development of a supplier action plan to address top pre- and post-award issues.

“The McNamara DLA complex is a magnificent venue for industry events like this,” said Richard Grossman, president of government services for TRC. “We’re looking for information on utility privatization and upcoming business opportunities. Today’s event has been outstanding.”

For more information about doing business with DLA Energy, visit the DLA Energy webpage.
Attachment J:

Partner Annual Assessment Form –

Comments
#### Com. v. Mbewe

04/12/2016

20 WAL (2016)

Denied
159 A.3d 891

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-CROSS-PETITIONER, v. LORI A. HUMMEL, DEFENDANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT.

February 1, 2017

ON CROSS PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A cross-petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the cross-petition for certification is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the appellant may serve and file a supplemental brief on or before April 3, 2017, and respondent may serve and file a supplemental brief forty-five (45) days after the filing of appellant’s supplemental submission, or, if appellant declines to file such a submission, on or before May 18, 2017.
#### Bobbie Thompson, Appellant, v District Council 37 et al., Respondents.

[63 NYS3d 674]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered on or about June 3, 2016, which granted defendants’ CPLR 3211 motion to dismiss the, in effect, hybrid complaint and CPLR article 78 petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*470As the latest adverse action alleged by plaintiff occurred on September 17, 2012, when defendant union informed her that it would not arbitrate her termination, and plaintiff did not commence this action until September 10, 2015, all of her claims against defendant New York City Department of Education (DOE), sued herein as “Board of Education,” are time-barred, either under the four-month limitations period governing claims under CPLR article 78 *(see*CPLR 217 [1]; *Matter of Lipton v New York City Bd. of Educ.,*284 AD2d 140, 140-141 [1st Dept 2001]) or the one-year limitations period applicable to other claims against DOE *(see*Education Law § 3813 [2-b]; *Matter of Amorosi v South Colonie Ind. Cent. School Dist.,*9 NY3d 367, 369 [2007]).

Plaintiff’s claims against the union for breach of the duty of fair representation are likewise untimely under the applicable four-month limitations period *(see*CPLR 217 [2] [a]; *Cruz v United Fedn. of Teachers,*128 AD3d 526, 526-527 [1st Dept 2015]). All of her discrimination claims against the union relating to events alleged to have occurred prior to September 10, 2012 are untimely under the governing three-year limitations periods (see CPLR 214 [2]; Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-502 [d]; *Santiago-Mendez v City of New York,*136 AD3d 428, 428 [1st Dept 2016]). Plaintiff’s facially timely claim that the union discriminated against her by refusing to arbitrate her termination fails to state a cause of action, as plaintiff has failed to allege any facts which could support an inference of bias (see *Llanos v City of New York,*129 AD3d 620, 620 [1st Dept 2015]; *Askin v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y.,*110 AD3d 621, 622 [1st Dept 2013]).

Plaintiff’s remaining contentions, including her constitutional claims and her claims under Civil Service Law § 75, are unpreserved and without merit.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Maz-zarelli, Kahn and Moulton, JJ.
#### TufAmerica, Inc., Respondent, v EMI Unart Catalog, Inc., Appellant.

[63 NYS3d 236]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo S. Hagler, J.), entered September 12, 2016, which, to the extent appealed *435from, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to five of the seven named songs, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant music publisher failed to establish prima facie that plaintiff music publisher did not own the exclusive administration rights to certain songs by George Patterson, a musician and composer, who died in 2003 *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). It was not plaintiff’s burden on defendant’s motion to prove that it owned those rights *(id.).*Defendant failed to demonstrate either the invalidity of a 2001 agreement by which Patterson allegedly transferred the rights to plaintiff or the validity of a 1973 agreement by which, allegedly, defendant’s predecessor in interest, Kama Sutra Music Inc., acquired those rights from Patterson.

The motion court denied defendant’s motion on the ground that defendant did not show a clear chain of title from Kama Sutra to itself to the rights conveyed through the 1973 agreement. Defendant contends that its own chain of title is irrelevant because in any event rights conveyed to Kama Sutra in 1973 could not have been conveyed to plaintiff in 2001. However, defendant did not show that those rights were still intact and held by some entity other than itself in 2001. Thus, defendant failed to establish that it, or anyone, was in possession of those rights at the time the 2001 agreement was entered into or is in possession of those rights at present.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Andrias, Gische, Kern and Singh, JJ.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

Each of the following  directors and officers of Merrill Lynch & Co.,  Inc., the
general  partner of Merrill  Lynch  Preferred  Funding  I, L.P.,  Merrill  Lynch
Preferred Funding II, L.P.,  Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.,  Merrill
Lynch Preferred  Funding IV, L.P.,  Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P., and
Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding VI, L.P. (the  "Partnerships"),  appoints Thomas
H.   Patrick,   John  C.   Stomber   and  Mark  B.   Goldfus   individually   as
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution,  to sign and file
Annual  Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  December 29,  2000,  and
amendments to the forms, on behalf of each of the Partnerships,  with full power
and authority to perform any appropriate or necessary act in connection with the
filing of the forms.

This  Power  of  Attorney  has  been  signed  by the  following  persons  in the
capacities indicated on the 28th day of March, 2001.




     Signature                                       Title



      /s/ David H. Komansky                  Chairman of the Board and Chief
--------------------------------------
         (David H. Komansky)                 Executive Officer



      /s/ Thomas H. Patrick                  Executive Vice President and Chief
--------------------------------------       Financial Officer (Principal
         (Thomas H. Patrick)                 Financial Officer)



      /s/ Ahmass L. Fakahany                 Senior Vice President and
--------------------------------------       Controller (Principal Accounting
         (Ahmass L. Fakahany)                Officer)



     /s/  W.H. Clark                         Director
--------------------------------------
         (W.H. Clark)



     /s/  Jill K. Conway                     Director
--------------------------------------
         (Jill K. Conway)



     /s/  Stephen L. Hammerman               Director
--------------------------------------
         (Stephen L. Hammerman)



     /s/  George B. Harvey                   Director
--------------------------------------
         (George B. Harvey)



     /s/  William R. Hoover                  Director
--------------------------------------
         (William R. Hoover)



     /s/  Robert P. Luciano                  Director
--------------------------------------
         (Robert P. Luciano)



     /s/  David K. Newbigging                Director
--------------------------------------
         (David K. Newbigging)



     /s/  Aulana L. Peters                   Director
--------------------------------------
         (Aulana L. Peters)



     /s/  John J. Phelan, Jr.                Director
--------------------------------------
         (John J. Phelan, Jr.)



     /s/  John L. Steffens                   Director
--------------------------------------
         (John L. Steffens)
# NATO partner tours DLA Energy petroleum lab

/ Published Oct. 23, 2019
RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany, 
Representatives from the Netherlands Ministry of Defense visited Defense Logistics Agency Energy Europe & Africa’s Petroleum Laboratory to learn about its fuel testing capabilities, Oct. 15. 

Netherlands Army Lt. Col. Marc Verwer, commander of Fuel, Lubricants and Chemicals Department, along with Willem Zijderveld and Nicolaas van der Veen, managers of the Technical Center of Expertise for Fuels and Petroleum, Oil and Lubricant Products, toured the Rhine Ordnance Barracks facility in Germany to gain a better understanding of how aviation and ground fuels are tested for quality and purity. 

As one of five DLA Energy labs worldwide, the facility receives approximately 2,000 fuel samples each year including routine quality surveillance, investigations of possible contamination as well as testing for secured fuels. 

“The Royal Netherlands visit was a great opportunity to not only continue building face-to-face bonds with one of our key partners in the region but to learn alongside them,” said Sam J. Fedele, DLA Energy Europe & Africa logistics management specialist. 

Chemist Elena Van Meter explained that the Dutch military uses commercial contracted laboratories to test their fuel samples and often experience delays when samples are lost and specialized testing equipment is not readily available. 

“The visit brought to light ideas about how we can bridge gaps and overcome challenges they face,” Van Meter said. 

Fedele, a member of the DLA Energy International Agreements team, said the visit helps the two agencies work toward mutually beneficial goals. 

“The visit helps reinforce our cooperative efforts as we work towards a new implementing arrangement to document fuel transactions and find ways to mutually support one another through the use of Acquisition Cross Servicing Agreements,” Fedele said. 

The Netherlands is one of 8 NATO countries who have established fuel exchange agreements with DLA Energy. In August, they participated in the 15th annual Fuel Exchange Forum in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.

“Knowing the needs and capabilities of our partners, customers and allies is a valuable thing,” said DLA Energy Europe & Africa chemist Dr. Elmar Mohrhardt. “By showing our Netherlands partners the capabilities of our lab we get better in our job.”