alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Resource management director reflects on year
 By Jeff Landenberger
  As this interesting and hopefully unique year comes to a close, the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services Resource Management Director Stacey Pilling recently took a few moments to share her reflections on the challenges and victories her team shared in 2020, and what the road ahead might look like. “I think the biggest challenge for Resource Management, probably like everybody else, was dealing with COVID-19,” Pilling said. “How do we deal with COVID and ensure that we are meeting the mission and taking care of our people at the same time?” **Cheryl Cardoza stationed at DLA Disposition Services at Jacksonville, Florida operates Material Handling Equipment support the warfighter. Cardoza took part in the MHE Safety Summit that was shifted to an online event this year due to the pandemic.




A person moves scrap with an MHE
        MHE
            Cheryl Cardoza stationed at DLA Disposition Services at Jacksonville, Florida operates Material Handling Equipment support the warfighter. Cardoza took part in the MHE Safety Summit that was shifted to an online event this year due to the pandemic.

            SHARE IMAGE:

                Download Image
                    Image Details
                    
                    Photo By: Unknown
                    
                    VIRIN: 201013-D-AA987-074**She stressed the necessity of the working team that brought together people not just from DLA Disposition Services, but from across DLA to ensure the appropriate guidance emanating from multiple sources, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was adhered to, and that proper personal protective equipment was made available to field sites and headquarters staff. The pandemic fundamentally changed the way that employees and customers all interacted, which presented the Resource Management team with numerous challenges. DLA Disposition Services’ Disposal Service Directors and Area Managers gather annually at the headquarters in Battle Creek, Michigan, for a leadership summit in October. At the same time, a Material Handling Equipment Safety Summit was due to draw MHE trainers from all over the world. Not this year. “With COVID, we were not able to travel, so we had to have a little out-of-the-box thinking and figure out how we could still conduct our two summits in a virtual environment,” Pilling said. After both summits were conducted virtually, the feedback received from participants was extremely positive, despite the alternative format. Looking forward, Pilling said the directorate is already incorporating lessons learned and crafting new plans. “Every year, we usually hold two ‘DSR Universities’ for our Disposal Service Representatives; it’s a ‘101’ for disposal knowledge,” Pilling said. “We typical bring people [to Battle Creek], but this year we are transitioning our DSR University over to a virtual environment. Our first course is scheduled for the second quarter of 2021.”
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|Price of El Paso, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|Price of El Paso, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb  | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |      |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 7.87
|2023                                                                                                                              |     | 6.26 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<CIK>                            0001027343
<NAME>                           MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING I, L.P.
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-26-1997
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                333,732,796
<RECEIVABLES>                                 6,394,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            340,127,612
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              340,127,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         6,394,816
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                 283,505,200
<COMMON>                                     50,227,596
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                340,127,612
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             25,914,731
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              25,914,731
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          25,914,731
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 25,914,731
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit      21**

**Subsidiaries      of the Registrant**

|                                                |   | **State or Other**  |   |           |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|----------------|--------|
|                                                |   | **Jurisdiction of**      |   | **Percentage** |   |
|                                                |   | **Incorporation**             |   | **Ownership**  |   |
| **Parent**                                          |   |                          |   |           |   |   |
|                                                |   |                          |   |           |   |   |
| First                South Bancorp, Inc.            |   | Virginia                      |   |           |        |   |
|                                                |   |                          |   |           |   |   |
| **Subsidiary**                                      |   |                          |   |           |   |   |
|                                                |   |                          |   |           |   |   |
| First                South Bank                     |   | North                Carolina |   |           | 100    | % |
|                                                |   |                          |   |           |   |   |
| First                South Preferred Trust I        |   | Delaware                      |   |           | 100    | % |
|                                                |   |                          |   |           |   |   |
| **Subsidiaries                of First South Bank** |   |                          |   |           |   |   |
|                                                |   |                          |   |           |   |   |
| First                South Investments, Inc.        |   | North                Carolina |   |           | 100    | % |
|                                                |   |                          |   |           |   |   |
| First                South Leasing, LLC             |   | North                Carolina |   |           | 100    | % |

----
---

Exhibit 15.2

CONSENT OF AUTHOR

The Board of Directors of Royal Standard Minerals Inc.

Reference is made to the technical reports (the Technical
Reports) entitled Proposals to upgrade SouthPit, Deep Dive, Half Moon,
Paperweight, and Hamburger Hill to a measured gold resource, Amended 43-101
Technical Report(September 30th, 2003) and Proposals to
upgrade SouthPit, Deep Dive, Half Moon, Paperweight, and Hamburger Hill to a
measured gold resource, 43-101 Technical Report(August 2003) each of which
the undersigned has prepared for Royal Standard Minerals Inc.

I have reviewed and approved the summaries of and extracts from
the Technical Reports prepared to be filed with the Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2013 of Royal Standard Minerals Inc. and
confirm that the summaries and extracts fairly and accurately represent the
information in the Technical Reports. I hereby consent to the written disclosure
of my name and reference to the Technical Reports in the public filing of the
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2013 of Royal
Standard Minerals Inc. with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

I further consent to the incorporation by reference of such
information into Royal Standard Minerals Inc. registration statements on Forms
S-8 (File Nos. 333-161518 and 333-182345).

Dated: June 11th. 2013

|/s/ Donald G. Strachan               | 
|------------------------------------ | 
|Name: Donald G. Strachan             | 
|Title: Consulting Economic Geologist | 

---
159 A.3d 887

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. J.T.P., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

February 1, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
EX-12
                              RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                          EXHIBIT 12


                                                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST I
                                                                MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING I, L.P.
                                                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                          (dollars in thousands)



                                   FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                    DECEMBER 30, 2005                  DECEMBER 31, 2004                  DECEMBER 26, 2003
                           ---------------------------------    --------------------------------   ---------------------------------
                            MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                              PREFERRED         PREFERRED          PREFERRED        PREFERRED         PREFERRED        PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST I   FUNDING I, L.P.    CAPITAL TRUST I  FUNDING I, L.P.   CAPITAL TRUST I   FUNDING I, L.P.
                           ---------------   ---------------    ---------------  ---------------   ---------------   ---------------

<S>                             <C>                <C>            <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>

Earnings                          $ 21,972          $ 25,682           $ 21,972         $ 25,628          $ 21,972          $ 25,623
                                  ========          ========           ========         ========          ========          ========


Fixed charges                     $      -          $      -           $      -         $      -          $      -          $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution requirements          21,313            21,972             21,313           21,972            21,313            21,972
                                  --------          --------           --------         --------          --------          --------

Total combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements        $ 21,313          $ 21,972           $ 21,313         $ 21,972          $ 21,313          $ 21,972
                                  ========          ========           ========         ========          ========          ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
 fixed charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                         1.03              1.17               1.03             1.17              1.03              1.17



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thang Thanh Nguyen, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 776]

— Motions for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the last paragraph of the memorandum-order entered October 2, 2003 (309 AD2d 1269) is amended by adding the following sentences before the last sentence: “We note that the sentence imposed on count six runs concurrently with the sentences imposed on counts seven and eight and the sentences imposed on counts seven and eight run consecutively to the sentences imposed on counts two, four and five. Thus, defendant’s aggregate sentence is unaffected *(see People v Jeanty,*268 AD2d 675, 680 [2000], *Iv denied*94 NY2d 949 [2000]).” Present—Green, J.P., Pine, Wisner and Hayes, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30032 Summary Calendar

BRIAN K. CHISHOLM, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus C. COLL, Badge # 375, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-976

- - - - - - - - - - August 19, 1997 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Brian K. Chisholm, Louisiana prisoner # 323477, argues that the district court erred in dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 excessive-force claim against the defendant Deputy Coll. Chisholm contends that he established that he was injured by the defendant’s use of excessive force. Chisholm did not file specific objections to the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Therefore, the dismissal of his suit must be reviewed for plainNo. 97-30032 -2- error only. See Douglass v. United Services Auto. Ass’n , 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996)(en banc). Chisholm has not demonstrated that the district court plainly erred in rejecting the verity of Chisholm’s testimony and in determining that Deputy Coll used a reasonable degree of force to control a discipline problem created by Chisholm. Nor has Chisholm demonstrated that the district court plainly erred in determining that Chisholm did not suffer a serious injury as a result of the incident. The district court’s factual findings support its legal conclusion that Deputy Coll did not employ excessive force in violation of Chisholm’s constitutional rights.
See Rankin v. Klevenhagen , 5 F.3d 103, 106 (5th Cir. 1993). Nor has Chisholm shown that the district court plainly erred in its determination that the use of offensive language by the deputy was not sufficient to give rise to a constitutional violation. Mere allegations of verbal abuse and threats by prison officials do not state a claim under § 1983. See Bender v. Brumley , 1 F.3d 271, 274 n.4 (5th Cir. 1993). Chisholm has not demonstrated that the district court committed error, plain or otherwise.
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14066]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Intent to File an Application for a New License

May 21, 1998.
    a. Type of filing: Notice of Intent to File An Application for a 
New License.
    b. Project No.: 5044.
    c. Date filed: April 28, 1998.
    d. Submitted By: Avondale Mills, Inc., current licensee.
    e. Name of Project: Sibley Mill Project.
    f. Location: On the Augusta Canal of the Savannah River, in the 
City of Augusta, Richmond County, Georgia.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Section 15 of the Federal Power Act, 18 CFR 
16.6 of the Commission's regulations.
    h. Effective date of current license: April 1, 1953.
    i. Expiration date of current license: March 31, 2003.
    j. The project consists of: (1) intake works, including four steel 
diversion gates and a 280-foot-long headrace; (2) three generating 
units with a total installed capacity of 2,475 kW located inside the 
Sibley Mill structure; (3) a 350-foot-long, 30-foot-wide, 38-foot-deep 
open tailrace; and (4) appurtenant facilities.
    k. Pursuant to 18 CFR 16.7, information on the project is available 
at: Avondale Mills, Engineering Department, 2 Hickman Street, 
Graniteville, SC 29829, (803) 663-2334.
    l. FERC contact: Tom Dean (202) 219-2778.
    m. Pursuant to CFR 16.9 each application for a new license and any 
competing license applications must be filed with the Commission at 
least 24 months prior to the expiration of the existing license. All 
applications for license for this project must be filed by March 31, 
2001.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14066 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# L_2010139EN.01000301.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 139/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 139/3

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 490/2010 of 3 June 2010 not fixing a minimum selling price in response to the first individual invitation to tender for the sale of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Regulation (EU) No 477/2010

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 138 of 4 June 2010
  )

On page 10, in the title, recital 1 and Article 1:

for:

‘Regulation (EU) No 477/2010’,

read:

‘Regulation (EU) No 447/2010’.

---
#### Gress v. Gress

11/16/2015

548 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 393
# Agency aids NATO disposal needs

/ Published June 17, 2020
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan, 
Defense Logistics Agency personnel in Afghanistan not only support the equipment disposal needs for U.S. forces, but they also answer the call for NATO items.

The DLA Disposition Services team at Kandahar recently began processing 10 trucks for NATO.                Ten NATO bulk fuel carriers received at DLA Disposition Services' Kandahar site await their end.                            Awaiting disposal                            Ten NATO bulk fuel carriers received at DLA Disposition Services' Kandahar site await their end.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Marcus WiermanVIRIN: 200608-D-D0441-111

Paul McCarthy, a property accountability officer and NATO liaison, said the bulk fuel carriers were used by a previous contractor solely for refueling aircraft until Dec 2014. A new contractor initially used them but stopped due to unreliability. McCarthy said the trucks have not been used since 2015.

Marcus Wierman, Kandahar site chief, put his team to work on the destruction of the vehicles.  Before the destruction began the trucks were inspected for proper draining and purging of fuels, lubricants or hazardous materials.

“We found multiple fire extinguisher inside that have been returned back to NATO,” Wierman said.

Kandahar receives NATO furnished equipment regularly. Wierman said material turn-ins have increased as NATO optimizes its equipment on Kandahar and outlying forward operating bases. NATO units are required to turn in material with the same documentation as the U.S. units. Wierman said special Department of Defense Activity Address Codes have been given to countries that have implementing agreements.                 Tanks for ten NATO bulk fuel carriers awaiting destruction at DLA Disposition Services' Kandahar site.                            Tanks awaiting disposal                            Tanks for ten NATO bulk fuel carriers awaiting destruction at DLA Disposition Services' Kandahar site.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Marcus WiermanVIRIN: 200608-D-D0441-002

“These countries pay the U.S. government to dispose of the material,” Wierman said. “These trucks alone weigh 380,000 pounds or 172,591 kilograms, and they pay 45 cents per kilogram-- over $77,000 just for these trucks.”

After the destruction work is completed, the resulting scrap metal will be loaded into containers and sold to local Afghan contractors.
#### Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., Appellant, v Vincent Jackson, Also Known as Vincent R. Jackson, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[48 NYS3d 897]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered April 21, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to renew defendant Vincent Jackson’s prior motion to vacate the default judgment against him, or, alternatively, for vacatur of three of the court’s prior orders, which, among other things, vacated the default judgment, granted a traverse hearing, and dismissed the case, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly denied the motion for leave to renew, because plaintiff failed to offer new facts that would change the court’s prior determination (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]). Nor was vacatur of the court’s prior orders warranted under CPLR 5015 (a).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.