alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Aviation spotlights Christina Ann Treviño during Hispanic Heritage Month

/ Published Sept. 28, 2020
RICHMOND, Va., 
Hispanic Heritage Month is celebrated across the nation every year from Sept. 15 to Oct. 15. The 2020 theme is “Hispanics: Be Proud of Your Past and Embrace the Future.”  Defense Logistics Agency Aviation is proud to feature Christina Ann Treviño.

**I am:** A supply specialist in the Inventory Management Division of DLA Aviation’s Planning Process Directorate.

**Describe your job:** In a nutshell, I respond to distribution and supply centers, and customers worldwide that have questions or problems relating to items managed by Defense Logistics Agency.

**How long have you worked at DLA Aviation?** I have been working for DLA Aviation since November 27, 2017. This upcoming November will bring my total time to three years.

**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?** My favorite thing about working here at DLA is that I get to work with people from all different walks of life from the warfighter to individuals from all over the world.

**The theme for this month's observance is "Hispanics: Be Proud of Your Past and Embrace the Future." In your words, briefly explain what this means to you?** This year’s theme makes me think back to growing up and the hardships I had to endure with regards to being Hispanic, let alone being a white Hispanic. I had to deal with inside racism; however, I didn’t let this get me off course. My experiences taught me that my heritage and who I am physically (or genetically) doesn't define me. My limitations are mine and mine alone. Ultimately, I feel that having to deal with these issues as a child only helped to make me into the person I am today and for that I am forever grateful.

**Tell us something unique about your heritage or country of origin.** My family is from Coahuila, Mexico. Something most people don’t know about Coahuila is that it is the world’s largest silver producer and the place where the majority of Mexico’s gold is produced.

**What is one thing you'd like others to know about your heritage?** I don’t know how it was in other households, but in our home, it was a must that a prayer was said before every meal.

**Why is it important to you that we celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month?** I feel that it is important for us to celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month in order to recognize those individuals who paved the way and made it possible for us to live the lives that we live today.
# DLA helps Army keep aircraft sanitized during COVID-19 

/ Published May 6, 2020
RICHMOND, VA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation is providing disinfectants to keep the Army’s fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft sanitized during the COVID-19 outbreak.

DLA Aviation employees are working with the Army’s Aviation and Missile Command at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, as well as National Guard and Army Reserve aviation offices to gauge customers’ needs for disinfectant. Approximately 300 of the 500 orders received have shipped so far and about 200 orders are on contract for direct shipment from the vendor, said Army Col. Buddy Hopkins, chief of the Customer Operations Directorate’s Army Customer Facing Division. 

Aircraft such as the C-12 Huron and UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters are being flown in support of state COVID-19 missions, mostly transporting state leaders and medical supplies, he said. The Army’s flight training school at Fort Rucker, Alabama, is also receiving disinfectant so aircraft can be cleaned after each flight to minimize risks of virus spread.

Calla 1452 was the only bio-hazard disinfectant authorized for use on Army aircraft when Hopkins’ team began researching products, but demand quickly outpaced the manufacturer’s ability to keep up, he said. Instead, Hopkins’ team provided approved alternatives like isopropyl and ethyl alcohol while searching for additional sources.

"There are many disinfectants on the market, but not all are allowable for use on aircraft as they can cause corrosion to critical aircraft components," he said. 

Working with the DLA Aviation Supplier Operations’ Original Equipment Manufacturing Directorate, the team identified ZEP Aviation RTU Disinfectant as an additional option. It has been assigned a national stock number and added to an existing contract. 

Chief Warrant Officer 3 José Sanchez worked with the Army's Utility Helicopter Project Office to get temporary approval for the product as well as nine other disinfectants awaiting evaluation by the Army’s Engineering Support Activity.
• (4910-13-P)
14CFR ParI 39 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration



# 00'/0 [Docket No. FAA-2010-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-142-AD} 

### '" 2_Z"3-'0 RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthio.ess Directives; EADS CASA (Type Certificate Previously Held by 

## ,,,,-12.

~ ;:. 2-'5'//(/ OI.lTm<l SVMBOL



# • • • • • • • listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This proposed AD results from product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: authority of another country toidentify and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation

Fuel Airworthiness Limitations arising from the required systems safety analysis are items that have been shown tohave failure mode(s) associated with an 'unsafe condition' 

## ***. These are identified inFailure Conditions forwhich anunacceptable probability ofignition risk could exist if specific tasks and/or practices are not performed in accordance with the corrective actions(s) developed by the TC [type certificate] holder. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

Prompted by [an) accident 

## *

## ** the FAA published SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88) 

## ***. Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.) Model CN-235, CN-235-100, CN-235·200, and CN·235-300 Airplanes, and Model C-295 Airplanes ~ 

# '3/3/10 -OIJI1I"GSn<aoL ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). 

## /'rNIJ..

# -1 

# .~ SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew allworthiness directive (AD) for the productsC-(~ .n 

## ~",/,o
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50788

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAVIER GALINDO-CABALLERO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:19-CR-82-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Javier Galindo-Caballero appeals the 54-month sentence imposed 

following conviction based on his guilty plea of illegal reentry after having been 

previously removed. He argues that his sentence was imposed under an 

unconstitutional statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). Specifically, he contends that in 

order to trigger a sentencing enhancement under Section 1326(b), the fact of a 

prior conviction must be alleged in the indictment and proven to a jury; 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 2, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-50788 Document: 00515369463 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/02/2020
No. 19-50788

2

therefore, he asserts that Section 1326(b) is unconstitutional. He correctly 

concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United 

States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he makes the argument to preserve it for 

further possible review. See United States v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th 

Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625–26 (5th Cir. 

2007).

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance 

and, alternatively, seeks an extension of time to file its brief. Because the issue 

is foreclosed, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. 

v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to 

file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-50788 Document: 00515369463 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/02/2020
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30507-30508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 2, 1998.
    Time: 1:30 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: W. Gregory Zimmerman, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; Telephone: 301 443-1340.

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 2, 1998.
    Time: 11 a.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: W. Gregory Zimmerman, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; Telephone: 301 443-1340.

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 8, 1998.
    Time: 1:30 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: W. Gregory Zimmerman, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; Telephone: 301 443-1340.

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 23, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: Chevy Chase Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: W. Gregory Zimmerman, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; Telephone: 301 443-1340.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)


[[Page 30508]]


    Dated: May 27, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 98-14764 Filed 6-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tilden Associates, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Robert
Baskind, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ ROBERT BASKIND
------------------------
Robert Baskind,
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
April 14, 2004


                                       42
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7395

KENNETH WAYNE CROWDER, 

 Petitioner – Appellant, 

 v. 

KEITH L. DAVIS, Warden, Deerfield Correctional Center, 

 Respondent – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:09-cv-00321-LO-TRJ) 

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 18, 2009 

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Kenneth Wayne Crowder, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Kenneth Wayne Crowder seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Crowder has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
2016-1627.

#### Flynn v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-29, 2016-Ohio-5903.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

French, J., not participating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-QSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              243
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,600
<OTHER-SE>                                    (46,169)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,674
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,547
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,547)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
No. 12-8301.

#### Lewis *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASIDNGTON,DC

National Business Aircraft Association, Krueger Aviation, Inc., Harrison Ford, Justice Aviation, Kim Davidson Aviation, Inc., Aero Film, Youri Bujko, James Ross, Paramount Citrus LLC and Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association Complainants


### v. City of Santa Monica, California Respondent

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME Docket No
. 16-14-04

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above

referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 

### 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by which the**Director~s** 

### Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to October 15, 2015. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fa i r and complete determination in this case.

Randall S. Fiertz Director, Airport Compliance

and Management Analysis

## ~ed· 'J.. ( 2ol') 

### Date

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 

# J,.(



# ~r 2015, 

### I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice of Extension of Time to October 15, 2015, for FAA Docket 16-14-04 addressed to: 

### Counsel for Complainant Richard K. S imon, Esq. 1700 Decker School lane Malibu, CA 90265 rsimon3@verizon.net 

### Counsel for Respondent Rick Cole City Manager City of Santa Monica 1685 Main Street, Room 209 Santa Monica, CA 9040 I manager@s mgov .net Marsha Moutrie, City Attorney Josep h Lawrence, Assistant City Attorney Via U.S
. Mail

Via U.S. Mail

Lance Gams, Deputy City Attorney Ivan Campbell, Deputy City Attorney City of Santa Monica 1685 Main Street, Room 31 0 Santa Monica, CA 90401 marsha.mo utrie @s mgov .net jose 

### ph .Iawrence@sm gov. net lance. gams@sm gov .net ivan.campbell @s mgov .net Ste lios Makrides , Airport Manager City of Santa Monica A irport Administration Building 3223 Donald Douglas Loop South Santa Monica , CA 90405 s teli os. makri des@s mgo v .net Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airports Compliance Division, AC0

- 100



# r!kA~

Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance

and Management Analysis
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20132 

Summary Calendar

__________________

GLORIA TREVINO TURNER,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. MC-H-95-0004

- - - - - - - - - -

November 20, 1995

Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gloria Trevino Turner appeals the district court's order

denying her application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). 

Because Turner's affidavit and financial information indicate

that she is not able to meet the costs of this litigation without

undue hardship, the decision denying IFP is REVERSED. See Adkins

v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948);
No. 95-20132

-2-

Flowers v. Turbine Support Division, 507 F.2d 1242, 1244-46 (5th

Cir. 1975). 

As no transcript is necessary for the proper disposition of

this appeal, Turner's request for a transcript at Government

expense is DENIED. See Harvey v. Andrist, 754 F.2d 569, 571 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1126 (1985).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jason Garcia, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 633]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Moore, J.), rendered March 16, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Richter, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricky Kornegay, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 268]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juan M. Merchan, J.) rendered January 3, 2013, as amended February 21 and July 18, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of stalking in the first and third degrees and forcible touching, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of two years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence established all the necessary elements, including the requisite course of conduct, which in this case included conduct not involving physical contact *(see People v Noka,*51 AD3d 468 [1st Dept 2008], *lv denied*11 NY3d 739 [2008]), and the People did not have to prove more than one act of forcible touching.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.