alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Distribution’s Glos presented commander’s coin

/ Published April 17, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Future Plan’s Cassie Glos received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution Commanding Officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition event Feb. 26.

Glos seamlessly takes care of all support programs allowing the rest of the staff to concentrate on their specific tasks and duties. 

She handles the enabling programs ensuring the directorate’s successful operation to its full capacity — the government purchase card, security, pay and travel, communications security and classified storage. 

Recently, Glos was responsible for a successful and compliant inspection which is indicative of her focus on all of her programs, as well as all of the employee training that goes into ensuring Future Plan’s is compliant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000065759           
<NAME>                        MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         52,810
<SECURITIES>                                   1,565,258
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,783,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                   95,495
<INVENTORY>                                    3,211,479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,885,046
<PP&E>                                         6,110,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,791,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,204,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,152,148
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7,052,585
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,204,734
<SALES>                                        2,836,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,836,104
<CGS>                                          2,193,830
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,193,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               543,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                99,057
<INCOME-TAX>                                   35,554
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            63,503
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   63,503
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02
        


</TABLE>
#### Com. v. Stockton

08/17/2016

160 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 200
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Iowa Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Iowa Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 87,350 | 87,414
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 90,613 | 91,113 | 90,313 | 90,313 | 90,313 | 90,313 | 90,313 | 90,313 | 90,313 | 90,313
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 90,313 | 90,313 | 90,313 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Exhibit 23.1**

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-30847,333-57952, 333-101233 and 333-107111 of EPIQ Systems, Inc.on Form S-8, and in Registration Statement No. 333-101232of EPIQ Systems, Inc. on Form S-3, of our report dated February 25,2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of EPIQ Systems, Inc.for the year ended December 31, 2003.

**DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP**

**KansasCity, MissouriMarch 9, 2004**

----
2017-0460.

#### Lake Cty. Bar Assn. Unauthorized Practice of Law Commt. v. Pavlish.

On relator’s motion to show cause. Respondent, John Pavlish, ordered to show cause by filing a written response with the clerk of this court within ten days why respondent should not be held in contempt.
Regulatory Evaluation 

~~?~ 

Docket No. FAA-cilcJt-5"-~ 

;J 

Directorate Identifier: ~ c;:?o/5 z:-~A"..J...) 

A de/the 1rork hours. parts cost. and n11111her (?f U.S. registered products to the! whle he loll'. When 1·ou are 

.finished. click 011 the "l })(/ate Fields .. hwton to alllollllltica!zrj(/1 in the tolo!s. 

Update Fields ., 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Replacement I 11.00 86 

The known number of products in compliance: :\umber 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $8,256 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) \\'amml~ 

O n-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Inspection 

7 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? 

YES* 0 NO I2Sl 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* 0 NO I2Sl 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. @ 

YES 0 NO I2Sl 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* 0 NO I2Sl 

*Explanation: 

8
Filed 2/4/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2008 ND 16

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Cody G. Carlsen, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20070126

Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gerald H. Rustad, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Nicole E. Foster, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, N.D. 58802-2047, for plaintiff and appellee.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, 402 First Street NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554-3118, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Carlsen

No. 20070126

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Cody G. Carlsen appeals from a district court judgment following a jury verdict finding him guilty of reckless endangerment under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, a class C felony.  Carlsen argues the district court erred in its responses to two of the jury’s questions while the jury was in deliberations.  He also argues there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended August
17, 2008, (the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marcus King, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 854]—

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (AJvin Yearwood, J., at speedy trial motion; Judith Lieb, J., at jury trial and sentencing), rendered January 11, 2012, as amended October *41329, 2015, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts) and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s speedy trial motion. Defendant did not meet his burden of demonstrating that the People’s unequivocal statement of readiness, which is “presumed truthful and accurate,” was illusory *(People v Brown,*28 NY3d 392, 405 [2016]; *see also People v Sibblies,*22 NY3d 1174, 1180 [2014]). The record'support^’ the reasonable inference that, even if the People intended 3⁄4> strengthen their case by way of DNA evidence, but failed to make a timely motion for DNA testing, they had always been prepared to proceed to trial by relying solely on eyewitness testimony *(see People v Gnesin,*127 AD3d 652 [1st Dept 2015], *lv denied*29 NY3d 948 [2017]; *People v Wright,*50 AD3d 429, 430 [1st Dept 2008], *lv denied*10 NY3d 966 [2008]).

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in admitting into evidence a photograph of defendant taken about a month prior to the crime to corroborate the witnesses’ identification of defendant as the assailant, in that it depicted him wearing his hair in braids *(see e.g. People v King,*276 AD2d 319, 320 [1st Dept 2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 736 [2001]). There was nothing in the carefully redacted photograph that prejudiced defendant by suggesting that he had prior interactions with the law. The parties’ stipulation satisfied any authentication requirement.

The court also providently exercised its discretion by admitting evidence about the unsuccessful attempts by police to locate defendant, after the shooting, at his place of residence and other areas he was known to frequent. This evidence could be interpreted as supporting a possible inference of consciousness of guilt, and any ambiguity as to whether the evidence warranted such an inference presented a factual issue for the jury *(see People v Yazum,*13 NY2d 302, 304 [1963]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Tom, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli and Gische, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROSA SERRANO,

 Appellant,

v.

PELLICANO BUSINESS PARK, LLC,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00290-CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2012DCV06341)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction. 

See TEX.CIV.PRAC.&REM.CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(4). On September 15, 2016, the trial court 

entered a final judgment, and Appellant has filed a notice of appeal from that judgment (cause 

number 08-16-00291-CV). It is well established that if the trial court renders final judgment while 

an appeal from an order granting or denying a temporary injunction is pending, the interlocutory 

appeal is rendered moot. Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Group, P.A., 802 S.W.2d 235, 236 

(Tex. 1991). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX.R.APP.P.

42.3(a).

March 14, 2017

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
#### McGarry v. Philly Rock Corp. 31

03/30/2016

846 MAL (2015)

31

. Justice DONOHUE and WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 97
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13318]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 3, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Paul Kaboth, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. FirstMerit Corporation, Akron, Ohio; to acquire Security First 
Corp., Mayfield Heights, Ohio, and thereby indirectly acquire Security 
Federal Savings & Loan Association of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, and 
First Federal Security Bank of Kent, Kent, Ohio, and thereby engage in 
permissible savings and loan activities, pursuant to Sec.  
225.28(b)(4)(ii) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 14, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-13318 Filed 5-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard C. Notebaert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Qwest Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: August 1, 2007                 
|                                     
|/s/    RICHARD C.
NOTEBAERT          
|Richard C. Notebaert                 
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|No chart available.                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                                
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|District of Columbia Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries to District of Columbia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|No chart available.                                             
|No chart available.                                             
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Virginia Natural Gas International Receipts (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024