alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Air Force Col. Patrick R. Launey is awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal for service with DLA Distribution

/ Published June 29, 2020
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
In recognition of efforts done while serving with Defense Logistics Agency Distribution from June 2019, to June 2020, Air Force Col. Patrick R Launey has been awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal.

Launey's keen insight, personal initiative and brilliant innovative mindset helped power DLA Distribution's command of global reach, sustaining warfighter posture, readiness and lethality through a distribution network of 24 distribution centers and 34 other locations spanning 20 states and eight nations across geographic combatant commands.

                In recognition of efforts done while serving with Defense Logistics Agency Distribution from June 2019, to June 2020, Air Force Col. Patrick R Launey has been awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal.                            Air Force Col. Patrick R. Launey is awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal for service with DLA Distribution                            In recognition of efforts done while serving with Defense Logistics Agency Distribution from June 2019, to June 2020, Air Force Col. Patrick R Launey has been awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DLA DIstribution Public AffairsVIRIN: 200629-D-D0441-0001

Launey enabled operational execution of a workforce of approximately 7,400 civilian employees, 321 active and reserve military personnel and 1,600 contractors that together managed 2.5 million stock items worth $105 billion, while ensuring premiere customer service to 249,000 customers across 135 countries.

Launey oversaw the DLA Distribution scheduled truck program, maintaining 136 truck lanes, with 249 separate customer organizations, all at 98 different installations across the Defense Department network. Through these efforts DLA Distribution was able to save the American taxpayer $33.4 million through 2019 and $14.3 million in just the first six months of 2020.

During the initial and ongoing COVID-19 fight, Launey would oversee the efforts to ensure that personal protective equipment as well as meals were delivered across 24 distribution centers, all during a time of uncertainty and ever changing conditions across the entire logistics landscape.

DLA Distribution thanks Launey for his efforts and accomplishments. Launey’s performance has raised the bar for all at DLA Distribution.
#### Sonyia Lucious, Respondent, v Rutland Nursing Home of Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 792]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated May 3, 2002, which granted the plaintiffs motion to “restore” the action to active status.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendants’ contention, CPLR 3404 does not apply to this pre-note of issue case *(see Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv.,*282 AD2d 190 [2001]). Furthermore, there was no 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216, nor was there an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion to “restore” the action to active status *(see Torres v Nu-Way Mach. Corp. Co.,*296 AD2d 545 [2002]; *Johnson v Brooklyn Hosp. Ctr.,*295 AD2d 567 [2002]; *Farley v Danaher Corp.,*295 AD2d 559 [2002]). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.
No. 12-8535.

#### Marmolejo *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals.

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/30/2015 4:45:59 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
No. 12-8596.

#### Pineda-Sanchez *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Champlain, NY Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Champlain, NY Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0      | 63     | 26     | 197    | 38     | 30     | 10    
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 61     | 56     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Numbers
333-40633, 333-40631 and 333-77573 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement
Numbers 333-87999, 333-59968 and 333-69154 on Form S-3 of Ameritrade Holding
Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports dated October 23, 2001 (December 12,
2001, as to Note 6), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameritrade
Holding Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended September 28, 2001.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
December 18, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000068622
<NAME>                        U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         289
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                    144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,229
<PP&E>                                      33,447
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,881
<BONDS>                                      4,931
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     8,017
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,617)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,124
<SALES>                                      2,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,669
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,944
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                607
<INCOME-TAX>                                   233
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            374
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   374
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 24, 2013

NO. 03-11-00335-CV

John H. Thomas, M.D., Appellant

v.

Graham Mortgage Corporation and Chris Norris, Substitute Trustee, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING—OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being considered, 

because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment EXCEPT for 

the portions of the trial court’s judgment with respect to the Bank’s claims for a deficiency judgment 

and for attorney’s fees: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the opinion and 

judgment dated April 4, 2013, are withdrawn, and this opinion and judgment are substituted in their 

places; and that the portions of the trial court’s judgment with respect to the Bank’s claims for a 

deficiency judgment and for attorney’s fees are reversed, and that those portions of the cause are

remanded for further proceedings. However, we affirm the remainder of the trial court’s summary 

judgment. It is FURTHER ordered that each party shall pay the costs of the appeal incurred by that 

party, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
2
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION                              
|-------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350         
|AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)       
|OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Queen Mining Co.
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 31, 2007 | By:                             | /s/ H. Lutz Klingmann
|--------------------- | ------------------------------- | ---------------------
|                      |                                
|                      | H. Lutz Klingmann              
|                      | Principal Executive Officer and
|                      | Principal Financial Officer    

---
CAAP-11-0000132

#### State v. Ahina

Reversed
#### Merinda MM., Matter of (Carl MM.)

3d Dept: 143 AD3d 1095

denied
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 17, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Karen L. Grandstrand, Vice 
President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, P.O. Box 291, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. United Community Bancshares, Eagan, Minnesota; to engage de novo 
through its subsidiary, United Trust Company, N.A., Eagan, Minnesota, 
in non-depository trust company activities, pursuant to Sec.  
225.28(b)(5) of Regulation Y.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. CBOT Financial Corporation, New Waverly, Texas, and CBOT 
Financial Corporation of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware; to engage de 
novo through their subsidiary, CBOT Mortgage, Conroe, Texas (dba 
Citizens Mortgage), in brokering loans, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(1) 
of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 28, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-14577 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
No. 12-7738.

#### Swoboda *v.*Judicial Clerkship of the Supreme Court of Missouri et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# DLA senior leaders meet with industry partners during SEPRT 

/ Published May 22, 2019
Richmond, Va, 
The annual Senior Executive Partnership Roundtable was held at the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, May 9. The SEPRT gathers senior executives from the agency’s strategic supplier alliances to meet with the Defense Logistics Agency leadership and military customer senior leaders to discuss general issues affecting DLA Aviation suppliers.

DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry hosted the roundtable event and welcomed attendees, which included DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams; Air Force Brig. Gen. Christopher Hill, commander, Oklahoma City Air Logistics Complex, Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma; and Seth Burke, deputy program executive officer for Tactical Aircraft Programs, Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, Maryland.

Industry partners from all sixteen of Aviation’s strategic supplier alliances also attended the one-day event.

Hurry said the SEPRT is a great opportunity to share information, look for new ways to innovate, improve on processes already in place and set some targets to help ensure support to the warfighter is more efficient and effective.

Our best strength comes from the partnerships, relationships, and innovation that comes from the amazing team in this room, she said.

The SEPRT agenda for the day included discussions on providing support in an aging aircraft world, reviewing the results of a first-time ever supplier survey, Aviation customer perspectives, and an Aviation business overview that also addressed tactical challenges.

Another area of discussion was the progression towards meeting the Secretary of Defense’s goal of having 80% mission capable rates for the F-16, F/A-18, F-22, and F-35 weapon systems. Through the great partnerships between the services, DLA Aviation and industry, mission capable rates have increased across all of these platforms since February.  However, there’s still room for improvement across all parties to bridge the gap to meet the overall MC80 goal.

Hurry also talked about how overall Aviation supply chain material availability increased two percentage points from April 2018 to April 2019, going from 86.70% to 88.70%, while the number of backorders during this same timeframe decreased to 147,858, down from 149,081.

Hurry said while these numbers speak to the hard work and dedication put forth by DLA Aviation and industry, she acknowledged there is still much work to done.  

“I’m going to ask for your help. We need your innovations. We need all the great ideas from all of your teams out there to help us drive readiness,” she said.
# Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month: Howard G. DeMotta

/ Published May 14, 2019

*Editor’s note: The Defense Logistics Agency recognizes May as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month. In honor of their contributions to the agency’s global mission, DLA is highlighting Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders who work day in and day out to provide logistics support to America’s warfighters.*

**My name is:** Howard G. DeMotta

**I am:** A management support officer

**Describe your job in a sentence:** I provide support to the men and women assigned to DLA Indo-Pacific.

**How long have you worked at DLA?** I started my journey with DLA in 2010 as a business analyst.

**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?** The excitement of coming to work each day and working with a diverse group of professionals, especially my fellow Business Management Office colleagues.

**What are your best memories of working here?** Taking part in our annual DLA Indo-Pacific Ohana (family in Hawaiian) Picnic and witnessing the diversity and culture of the various people assigned to our organization.

**How do you make a difference?** Doing my best each day and by seeking ways to make a difference to allow our customer-facing personnel to be able to meet the demands of supporting the warfighter.

**What is one thing you’d like others to know about your heritage?** My home state is Hawaii. Before the annexation of Hawaii by the United States in 1898 and Hawaii becoming the 50th state in 1959, native Hawaiians had a well-established culture and long history of self-governance through its traditional Hawaiian monarchy. Through time, Hawaii witnessed the influx of various ethnics groups (Europeans and Asians) to support the growing agricultural industry. To this day, Hawaii remains one of the most ethnically diverse places in the world. I am proud of my Hawaiian, Chinese and Portuguese heritage along with growing up in Hawaii.

**Why is it important to you that we celebrate Asian Pacific Islander’s Heritage Month?** I am honored by the history of my Asian American and Pacific Islander ancestors and the sacrifices and suffering they went through in the building of our great nation. As such, it is equally important that we, as a nation of immigrants, continue to acknowledge and build the awareness of the significance of the contributions, culture, traditions and history of Asian American and Pacific Islanders in the United States.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tilden Associates, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Marvin
E. Kramer, Vice-President of Law and Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ MARVIN E. KRAMER
------------------------
Marvin E. Kramer
Vice-President of Law and Finance
April 14, 2004


                                       43