alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

181) IV-E-54 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:57 PM Sheet 181 of 242 
P.2 

1 . 

Km,' 

fr-xll-Z2 

TZ -<5 -5 V 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

JUN I 6 1988 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting With GM Concerning Refueling Test Procedure 

FROM: 

TO: 

John F. Anderson, Senior Project Manager 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

Dockets A-87-11, A-85-21 

On June 8, 1988, a brief meeting was held with 

representatives of General Motors concerning the upcoming test 

procedure workshop. The attendance list is attached. GM was 

concerned that sufficient time be made available for 

manufacturers to express their concerns about the proposed 

procedure. We explained that we were already planning changes 

to the proposed procedure in response to comments received 

during the comment period. Therefore, it seemed most 

appropriate to describe those changes first, and then provide 

opportunities for input. GM agreed that, given the situation, 

this was probably the best approach. 

Attachment 

0565w 
Meeting with GM 

P.3 

Name 

John Anderson 

Gary Herwick 

Jim Pasek 

Rick Rykowski 

Mark Maher 

Chet France 

Charles Gray 

Peter Hutchins 

Representing 

EPA 

GM 

GM 

EPA 

GM 

EPA 

EPA 

EPA 

Phone 

668-4496 

575-4451 

947-1778 

668-4339 

685-5610 

668-4338 

668-4404 

668-4340
FAA Summary of Stakeholder Engagement

Docket No. FAA-2013-0988

Notice Of Proposed Clarification Of Policy; Request For Comments

On Monday, November 18, 2013, staff from FAA’s Office of Airports and Office of the Chief

Counsel conducted briefings for the following congressional stakeholders regarding the Notice

of Proposed Clarification of Policy on the Airport Revenue Use Policy:

 Senate Appropriations Committee staff

 Senate Aviation Subcommittee staff

 House Appropriations Committee staff

 House Aviation Subcommittee staff

Additionally on November 18th, staff from FAA’s Office of Airports and Office of the Chief

Counsel, and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental Affairs conducted a

teleconference with representatives from the following industry organizations:

 Airlines for America

 American Association of Airport Executives

 National Association of State Aviation Officials

On Wednesday, November 20, 2013, staff from FAA’s Office of Airports and Office of the

Chief Counsel, and the DOT Deputy Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental Affairs

conducted a teleconference with representatives from the following state and local organizations:

 National Governors Association

 US Conference of Mayors

 National Conference of State Legislatures

 National League of Cities

 Council of State Governments

On Thursday, November 21, 2013, staff from FAA’s Office of Airports and Office of the Chief

Counsel conducted a teleconference with representatives from the following industry

organization:

 Airports Council International - North America
No. 12-840.

#### Werth *v.*Curtin, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Agency partners collaborate to clear building

/ Published Oct. 29, 2019
Fort Benning, Georgia, 
Before soldiers at Fort Benning, Georgia, could demolish a building once used by one part of the Defense Logistics Agency, another of its components offered its help to clear the building.Property from the former DLA Document Services site at Fort Benning was turned in to DLA Disposition Services to ensure the proper disposal solution. Property Disposal Specialist Raphael Berrios said Document Management Assistant Ruth Hasselbrock from DLA Document Services reached out after the staff learned they were closing their facility to discuss the turn-in of all of their equipment and to find a new home for one of their employees.“We communicated with DLA Document Services to see what their needs were and came to an agreement,” Berrios said. “DLA Disposition Services had space to host a DLA Document Services employee work in its facility.”The employee, a customer relations specialist/management and program analyst, has been working from the DLA Disposition Services building since earlier this year, before the demolition started. Berrios described how some of DLA Document Services’ equipment such as an electric pallet jack and forklift were received in place and made available for reutilization, transfer and donation requests. Other equipment such as a paper cutting machine and paper drill was shipped to the DLA Disposition Services site at Warner Robins, Georgia. Since DLA Document Services had no material handling equipment to load the equipment onto trucks, base transportation assets were requested to assist with the project.Afterwards, Hasselbrock sent her thanks to her DLA colleagues for their help.“I want to personally thank you for ... your help ... during the closure of our print shop,” Hasselbrock said. “The large items that had been lifeless for year would have been almost impossible to remove without your willingness to help ... You helped make our mission and deadlines a success.”A story by the Fort Benning Public Affairs Office said soldiers from an engineer unit of the Georgia National Guard used the demolition work to get training time on their equipment. The story noted that the collaboration helped the garrison demolish unoccupied buildings at less cost.“It was more cost-effective to take them down, free up the area, create green space for the local area, and possibly provide space for a future building,” said Tim Stone, an installation facilities utilization specialist at Fort Benning.
SHAWN LADARIUS DALE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4311

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 10, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Linda L. Nobles, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, CLARK, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Angelo Slabakis, Respondent, v Walter Schik et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[60 NYS3d 813]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered August 19, 2016, which granted defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss without prejudice and with leave to replead, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion by granting plaintiff leave to replead because one cannot determine, as a matter of law, that he will be unable to allege the requisite elements of the various causes of action *(see e.g. Davis v Scottish Re Group Ltd.,*138 AD3d 230, 236, 238 [1st Dept 2016]).

Plaintiff has since repled his complaint; thus, “the sufficiency of the allegations in the earlier complaint is rendered academic” *(Peters v Peters,*118 AD3d 593, 594 [1st Dept 2014]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
# L_2011159EN.01000101.xml

| 17.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 159/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 159/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 9 March 2011

on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on Scientific and Technological Cooperation

(2011/343/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 186, in conjunction with point (v) of Article 218(6)(a), thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Commission negotiated, on behalf of the Community, an Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on Scientific and Technological Cooperation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Commission negotiated, on behalf of the Community, an Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on Scientific and Technological Cooperation.

| (2) | That Agreement was signed by the representatives of the Parties on 30 November 2009 in Brussels, and has been provisionally applied upon signature pursuant to Article 7(2) of the Agreement, pending its conclusion. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

That Agreement was signed by the representatives of the Parties on 30 November 2009 in Brussels, and has been provisionally applied upon signature pursuant to Article 7(2) of the Agreement, pending its conclusion.

| (3) | As a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has replaced and succeeded the European Community. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has replaced and succeeded the European Community.

| (4) | The Agreement should be concluded on behalf of the Union, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Agreement should be concluded on behalf of the Union,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on Scientific and Technological Cooperation is hereby approved on behalf of the Union (1).

Article 2

The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 7(2) of the Agreement and make the following notification to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan:

‘As a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has replaced and succeeded the European Community and from that date exercises all rights and assumes all obligations of the European Community. Therefore, references to “the European Community” in the text of the Agreement are, where appropriate, to be read as “the European Union”.’

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 9 March 2011.

For the Council

The President

CSÉFALVAY Z.

---

(1)  See page 108 of this Official Journal.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-38-003]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Refund Report

June 2, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 18, 1998, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) filed a report to comply with Ordering Paragraph (E) 
and Appendix E of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's September 
10, 1997, ``Order Denying Petitions for Adjustment and Establishing 
Procedures for the Payment of Refunds'' issued in Public Service Co. of 
Colorado and Cheyenne Light, Fuel and Power Co., Docket Nos. RP97-369-
000, et al.
    Natural states that its May 18 refund report deals with the Kansas 
ad valorem taxes associated with Natural's gas purchases for the period 
of October 3, 1983, through June 28, 1988. Natural states it has 
identified two producers who owe $239.666. Natural has placed all 
producer refund payments in escrow pending the outcome of Natural's 
motion for waiver of the refund flowthrough requirements filed in 
Docket No. RP98-38-000.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before June 9, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-15105 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Dr. Ibrahim Fatiha Chiropractic, P.C.

1st Dept: 147 AD3d 696

denied
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Modernization Transition Committee (MTC)

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND DATE: June 17 and 18, 1998 beginning at 8:00 a.m.

PLACE: This meeting will take place at the Victoria Holiday Inn, 2705 
E. Houston Highway, Victoria, Texas.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public. The time between 8:30 
a.m. and noon on Wednesday, June 17 will be set aside for public 
comments on he proposed certifications of the Victoria Weather Service 
Office. The time from 9:45 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. on Thursday, June 18 will 
be set aside for public comments on the proposed certifications for 
Astoria, Chattanooga, Honolulu, Huntington, and Syracuse. Approximately 
200 seats will be available on a first-come first-served basis each 
day.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: This meeting will include MTC consultation on 
the proposed Consolidation, Automation and Closure Certifications for 
Victoria, Texas, Chattanooga, Tennessee, and Syracuse, New York; MTC 
consultation on the proposed Automation and Closure certifications for 
Astoria, Oregon, Honolulu, Hawaii, and Huntington, West Virginia; and a 
report on the NWS Modernization status.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Nicholas Scheller, National 
Weather Service, Modernization Staff, 1325 East-West Highway, SSMC2, 
Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. Telephone: (301) 713-0454.

    Dated: May 22, 1998.
Nicholas R. Scheller,
Manager, National Implementation Staff.
[FR Doc. 98-14184 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-M
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 99.1
                                  ------------


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     -----------------------------------------------------------------------

         I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Morgan's Foods, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
          May 25, 2003, (the "Report"), which this certification accompanies,
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                              /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and
                              Chief Executive Officer
July 9, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 26, 2023

No. 04-22-00834-CV

IN RE Stephen Patrick BLACK

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On December 12, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering 

the petition, real party in interest’s response, and the record, this court concluded relator did not 

show he was entitled to the relief sought and denied relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on 

January 4, 2023.

On January 17, 2023, relator filed a motion for rehearing requesting this court reconsider 

its January 4, 2023 order. After consideration, relator’s motion for rehearing is DENIED. 

It is so ORDERED on January 26, 2023.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

1

 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CV-15-1805, styled In re: the Commitment of Stephen Patrick Black, 

pending in the 274th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Gary L. Steel presiding.

FILE COPY
# Leadership change at DLA Support Team Kuwait – Distribution’s Rozzell accomplishments lauded

/ Published Jan. 15, 2021
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Navy Cmdr. Mark Rozzell relinquished command of Defense Logistics Agency Support Team-Kuwait to Navy Cmdr. Chris Thompson in a change of command ceremony hosted virtually Dec. 10 by Army Col. Hattie Richardson, regional commander, DLA Central Command and Special Operations Command.

Richardson praised Rozzell in her remarks noting a few of his accomplishments while at the helm. 

“Mark assumed command of DLA Support Team Kuwait in May 2020. Throughout his command, he led a cohesive workforce against a backdrop of constrained budgets, personnel reductions and organizational changes. While there are many significant contributions the team has made in the past six months under Mark’s superlative leadership; but please bear with me as i note the top three:
      - Team-Kuwait reviewed and expedited over 48,000 requisitions for numerous operational commands. This outstanding customer support helped to improve overall material readiness for our warfighters in the region from 83% to 90%. 
      - Mark and his team managed and provided oversight of DLA sustainment contracts totaling more than $1.7 billion which were key in sustaining U.S. and coalition forces in support of multiple combat missions in Iraq and Syria; and
      - Mark led his team’s efforts in providing crucial logistics expertise as the in-theater point of contact for DLA’s initial humanitarian aid sent in response to the explosion at the Port of Beirut in August 2020.

Richardson stated there is no doubt Team-Kuwait’s performance during Rozzell’s tour of duty has been superior and exceeded the DLA standard.

Rozzell will return to DLA Distribution headquarters as the deputy director of future plans.

“As one great leader departs, another arrives to take the helm,” remarked Richardson. She continued, “Only the best officers are selected to serve as joint commanders in DLA support teams. Cmdr. Thompson is a gifted leader and the right person to continue the strong and outstanding leadership at DLA Support Team-Kuwait. Chris comes to us from DLA distribution and he has amazing experiences, and a variety of key assignments to prepare him for this challenge ... I am confident that Team-Kuwait will continue to meet the challenges head-on under your leadership.”

DLA Support Team-Kuwait proudly supports our warfighters, with a team of less than 25 military and civilian professionals, operating in nine countries. They monitor the movement of DLA supply chain across the region to U.S. and coalition forces operating in the Central Command area of operation, with major customer support being to the 1st Theater Sustainment Command and the combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve as well as CENTCOM component commands. The team has successfully supported Operations Inherent Resolve, Spartan Shield and Freedom’s Sentinel, while working through border closings, country restrictions and customs clearances.
<PAGE>
                             (DELOITTE LETTERHEAD)

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
Number 333-117509 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 31, 2005 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Elbit Medical Imaging Ltd. and its
subsidiaries, (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to: (1) the differences between accounting
principles generally accepted in Israel and accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America; (2) the presentation of the "reported
amounts" and "adjusted values"; (3) claims that have been filed against Group
companies and for some of those claims petitions have been filed for
certification as class actions; and (4) the translation of New Israeli Shekel
amounts into U.S. dollar amounts), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-f
of Elbit Medical Imaging Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2004.


BRIGHTMAN ALMAGOR & CO.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
A MEMBER FIRM OF DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU



Tel-Aviv, Israel
June 30, 2005
Second Amendment to the Amgen Supplemental Retirement Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
 AMGEN SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN 
 (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005 
 And As Further Amended By The 
 First Amendment, Also Effective January 1, 2005) 
 Appendix A of the Amgen Supplemental Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2005 and as further amended by the First
Amendment to the Amgen Supplemental Retirement Plan, also effective January 1, 2005 (the “Plan”) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety, effective as of July 1, 2006, as follows: 
 Appendix A 
 Participating Subsidiaries and
Affiliates of Amgen Inc. 
  

	1.	Amgen USA Inc. – January 1, 2002 

  

	2.	Immunex Corporation – January 1, 2003 

  

	3.	Immunex Manufacturing Corporation – January 1, 2003 

  

	4.	Immunex Rhode Island Corporation – January 1, 2003 

  

	5.	Amgen Worldwide Services, Inc. – January 1, 2004 

  

	6.	Amgen San Francisco, LLC – January 1, 2005 

  

	7.	Tularik Pharmaceutical Company – January 1, 2005 

  

	8.	Amgen Fremont Inc. – July 1, 2006 

 To record
this Second Amendment to the Plan as set forth herein, the Company has caused its authorized officer to execute this document this 16th day of May, 2006. 
  

			
	 AMGEN INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Brian McNamee

		
	 Title:
	 	 Senior Vice President, Human Resources
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

142129

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142129 COA: 291790 Genesee CC: 07-021714-FC IVAN LEE PAGE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jonathan Deleon, Appellant.

[48 NYS3d 601]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (James M. Burke, J.), rendered March 11, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.