alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1992 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1992

   To amend chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, to provide for 
           results based regulations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 25 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

   Mr. Roth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, to provide for 
           results based regulations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Results Based Regulations Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. RESULTS BASED REGULATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 559 the following new section:
``Sec. 560. Results based regulations
    ``(a) For purposes of this section the term `regulation' means any 
rule for which the agency publishes a general notice of proposed 
rulemaking under section 553(b) or any other law.
    ``(b) To the greatest extent practicable, each agency shall include 
in the general notice of proposed rulemaking relating to a regulation--
            ``(1) a statement of--
                    ``(A) the overall outcomes and results to be 
                achieved by the regulation;
                    ``(B) methods to quantify such outcomes and 
                results;
                    ``(C) possible alternative methods to achieve such 
                outcomes and results; and
                    ``(D) a process for waiving in whole or part such 
                regulation if an alternative is subsequently proposed 
                under which the agency determines the waiver applicant, 
                and others covered by such waiver, would have no less 
                of an impact on the achievement of those outcomes and 
                results than would occur without such waiver; and
            ``(2) a solicitation for comments by persons affected by 
        the regulation on the methods and processes described under 
        paragraph (1) (B), (C), and (D).
    ``(c) An agency action taken under this section shall not be 
subject to review by a court of the United States.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 559 the following new item:

``560. Results based regulations.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 60 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
No. 12-8260.

#### Perdomo *v.*Hedgpeth, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Order filed, September 24, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00631-CV

____________

E.L. & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant

V.

JORGE H. PABON, RUTH PABON, WILLIAMS SOLIS, AND RUTHIE'S 

5022, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-30394

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 24, 2015. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Michelle Tucker, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-30404

____________

Alex Wilkins, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Michael Liberto, Deputy; Matthew Severns, Deputy, 

Defendants—Appellants.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:20-CV-2728

______________________________

Before King, Jones, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The panel has carefully considered this appeal in light of the oral 

argument, briefs, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we 

are constrained to agree with the district court that genuine issues of material 

fact exist, precluding our appellate review on interlocutory appeal. See 

Edwards v. Oliver, 31 F.4th 925 (5th Cir. 2022). APPEAL DISMISSED.

_____________________

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion 

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set 

forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 13, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-30404 Document: 00516711725 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/13/2023
# Marines celebrate 244 years of persistence

/ Published Nov. 6, 2019
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
A musical prelude from the U.S. Marine Corps Drum and Bugle Corps set a celebratory stage for the Marine Corps’ 244th birthday ceremony at the McNamara Headquarters Complex Nov. 5.

On November 10, 1775, a corps of Marines was created by a Second Continental Congress resolution.

“On November 10, we all stop what we’re doing no matter where we might be throughout the globe and reflect on this occasion,” said guest speaker Brig. Gen. Arthur Pasagian, commander, Marine Corps Systems Command.

Wearing the Marine Corps uniform every day is a privilege, he said.

“It symbolizes what all of us invest in the service, our families and our great nation,” he continued. “Being here with all the distinguished Marines and fellow service members from all of our joint services is really an awesome opportunity to reflect on our birthday.”

The general said it was particularly fitting to celebrate in the headquarters building for the Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Defense Contract Audit Agency and Defense Technical Information Center, adding that when Marines are called ashore to sustain operations, it’s no minor challenge.

“The things that come out of this building and through the network of defense logistics throughout this nation are really important, things like fuel and water that make a Marine air-ground task force so incredibly lethal,” he said. “Allowing those Marines to persist ashore is something that you contribute to. Your commitment to this nation and to the Marine Corps allows that to perpetuate.”

The general said training and equipping service members is a solemn, common mission.

“It’s something that’s big, and we owe it to all of our successors,” he said.

Pasagian closed by quoting the Marine Corps ethos.

“Being a Marine is a state of mind. It is an experience some have likened more to a calling than a profession. Being a Marine is not a job, not a paycheck; it is not an occupational specialty. It is not male or female, majority, minority, nor is it a rank insignia,” he said. “Rather, being a Marine comes from the eagle, globe and anchor that is tattooed on the soul of every one of us who wears the Marine Corps uniform.”

The celebration included a ceremonial cake-cutting by the oldest and youngest Marines present.
|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                               
|                                                                                                            
|Price of Liquefied Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas Exports Price to Singapore  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                            
|Price of Liquefied Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas Exports Price to Singapore  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 5.63   | 4.72  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.53   | 6.77   | 10.53  | 6.33   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# Memorial Day: Remember, Honor 

/ Published May 23, 2019
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
Memorial Day weekend is the unofficial three-day weekend that kicks off the summer season. It’s also the weekend when Americans honor the men and women who died while serving in the armed services. 

Across the nation, people will visit cemeteries, attend memorial tributes and participate in parades as a way of honoring and remembering those service members’ sacrifices. Read Defense Logistics Agency Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell K. Williams’ blog, which shares his thoughts on the remembrance of the 75th anniversary of D-Day.

Employees can read more in the Director's CAC-enabled blog.
#### Edgardo H. Linares, Appellant, v Napolean V. Suarez et al., Respondents.

[51 NYS3d 429]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCormack, J.), dated January 12, 2015, which granted the defendants’ motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action asserted in the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action asserted in the complaint is denied.

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injuries to the cervical and lumbar regions of the plaintiff’s spine did not constitute serious injuries under either the permanent consequential limitation of use or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Staff v Yshua,*59 AD3d 614 [2009]).

In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether he sustained serious injuries to the cervical and lumbar regions of his spine under the permanent conse*714quential limitation of use and significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants’ motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action asserted in the complaint.

Rivera, J.P., Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
No. 12-808.

#### Bouchard Transportation *v.*Messier.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A127
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1643 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1643

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel MATCH MAKER.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 8 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

   Mr. Mack introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel MATCH MAKER.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel 
MATCH MAKER, United States official number 908725.

                                 <all>
```
#### Ezriel Weinberger et al., Respondents, v Judlau Contracting, Inc., Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 338]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gammer, J.), dated December 5, 2002, which denied its motion to vacate a judgment of the same court entered January 3, 2002, upon its default in answering.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A party seeking to vacate a judgment entered upon its default in answering must make a showing of a justifiable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see *Hazen v Bottiglieri,*286 AD2d 708 [2001]; *Miles v Blue Label Trucking,*232 AD2d 382 [1996]). The only excuse offered by the defendant for its failure to timely serve an answer was delay caused by the defendant’s insurance carrier, which was insufficient (see *Hazen v Bottiglieri, supra; Miles v Blue Label Trucking, supra).*In addition, the defendant failed to demonstrate that it had a meritorious defense.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, since the default, the application for a default judgment, and inquest on damages all took place within the space of one year, the plaintiff was not obligated to provide it with separate notice of the inquest *(see*CPLR 3215 [g]; *Stoltz v Playquest Theater Co.,*257 AD2d 758 [1999]). We note also that although the defendant was served with a copy of the order granting the default judgment and setting the matter down for an inquest, the defendant failed to take any action for over a year and a half.

The defendant’s contention that the damage award was excessive is not properly before this Court since it was not raised at the trial level *(see Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Kolodny,*269 AD2d 564 [2000]), and we decline to reach it in the exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1498

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to release restrictions imposed

in connection with the conveyance of certain lands to the city of Rolla,

Missouri.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 27), 1993

Mr. DANFORTH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to release restrictions imposed in connection with the conveyance of

certain lands to the city of Rolla, Missouri.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rolla Airport Improve5 ment Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO GRANT RELEASES.

7 Notwithstanding section 16 of the Federal Airport

8 Act (as in effect on December 30, 1957), the Secretary

9 of Transportation is authorized, subject to the provisions
2

S 1498 IS

1 of section 4 of the Act of October 1, 1949 (50 App. U.S.C.

2 1622c), and the provisions of section 3 of this Act, to

3 grant releases from any of the terms, conditions, reserva4 tions, and restrictions contained in the deed of conveyance

5 dated December 30, 1957, or any other deed of convey6 ance dated after such date and before the date of enact7 ment of this Act, under which the United States conveyed

8 certain property to the city of Rolla, Missouri, for airport

9 purposes.

10 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS.

11 Any release granted under section 2 of this Act shall

12 be subject to the following conditions:

13 (1) The city of Rolla, Missouri, shall agree that,

14 in conveying any interest in the property which the

15 United States conveyed to the city by a deed de16 scribed in section 2, the city will receive an amount

17 for such interest which is equal to the fair market

18 value (as determined pursuant to regulations issued

19 by the Secretary of Transportation).

20 (2) Any such amount so received by the city

21 shall be used by the city for the development, im22 provement, operation, or maintenance of a public

23 airport.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Hoolae Paoa, Chief Executive Officer of Mid-State Raceway, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 10, 2004

/s/ Hoolae Paoa
Hoolae Paoa
Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 12, 2015

No. 04-15-00147-CV

CITY OF LAREDO, Texas,

Appellant

v.

Julian Jacobo REYNA,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CVQ-000557 D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellee’s brief in this accelerated appeal was due May 4, 2015. The brief has not been 

filed. 

We order appellee to file his brief by May 15, 2015. If the brief is not filed by the date 

ordered, we will order the case submitted without an appellee’s brief.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 220 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# DSCR employees “pedal for prevention” during Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month

/ Published April 12, 2019
Richmond, Va., 
Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, employees came out April 10 to “pedal for prevention” in support of Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month.

Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program planned the event in collaboration with the U.S. Army Reserve 80th Training Command - The Army School System and the Virginia National Guard to sponsor the free cycling class which was held in the DSCR Fitness Center Blue Room.  The class will be held again between 11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. on April 17 and April 24.

“It is a great way to burn calories all while supporting a great cause,” said Katrina Leverette, sexual assault response coordinator, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation. “Participating in this awareness event also adds 1,000 extra points to your SAAPM Virtual Fitness Challenge score.”

Leverette said Spirit Week is just around the corner, April 22-26.  

“Show your spirit, get together with fellow co-workers and meet me each day in the DSCR Center Restaurant for photos at 11:30 a.m.,” she said.

April 22 - Organization Day - Anyone who is affiliated with a community service organization can wear their agency or organization paraphernalia that day (i.e. motorcycle clubs, fraternities, sororities, etc.)

April 23 - Teal Tuesday - Wear something teal, whether it is a shirt, pants, tie, scarf, hat, etc. Show your support every Tuesday in April and you may win a prize.

April 24 - Denim Day - Wear your denim to work to show support for sexual assault survivors.

April 25 - Jersey or favorite team day.

April 26 – Sport day – Annual 5K Run/Walk (hot link to registration form) will take place at 9 a.m. on the DSCR fitness trail at the gazebo at the bottom of the hill. DLA Aviation commander has authorized administrative leave to all aviation employees who wanted to participate.

For more information or questions, contact Leverette at Katrina.Leverette@dla.mil or 804-279-1163
Exhibit
32.02




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Helen
D. McCarthy, Chief Financial Officer of R.J. O’Brien Fund Management, LLC.
(“RJOFM”), Managing Owner of JWH Global Trust (the “Trust”), certify that (i)
the attached annual report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) the information contained in the attached annual report on Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust.




By:
            /s/
      Helen D. McCarthyHelen
      D. McCarthySenior
      Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerR.J.
      O’Brien Fund Management, LLCMarch
      20, 2008
2017-1250.

#### State ex rel. Wynn v. Richards.

In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. On petitioner’s motion to expedite. Motion denied as moot.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.