alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 574-575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration
[DEA Number 170M2]


Task Force on Suspicious Orders Meeting

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Justice.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Suspicious Orders Task Force will be held on February 04-05, 
1998. The panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. both days at San 
Diego California Federal Building, 880 Front Street, San Diego, 
California. All proceedings will be held in the Sixth Floor Auditorium.
    This meeting will be open to the public on a space available basis. 
Any interested person may observe meetings or portions thereof and 
shall be permitted to participate in the discussions at the discretion 
of the meeting chairman and with the approval of the full-time 
Designated Federal Official (DFO) in attendance.
    In addition to presenting limited verbal statements, interested 
parties shall be permitted to file written statements with Task Force 
members. Written statements will be taken at any time during the 
meeting and distributed to the Task Force as soon as feasible. 
Presenters of written statements are requested to provide 25 copies of 
the

[[Page 575]]

statement to expedite distribution to the Task Force members. If the 
presenter does not/can not provide the requested copies, the DFO will 
arrange for the copies and the Task Force will consider the statement 
when the copies are available. Verbal comments may be limited in time 
by the DFO to insure adequate opportunity for testimony by as many 
presenters as possible. Any person wishing to submit agenda items or 
desiring to present formal testimony should contact the DFO at least 
ten (10) days prior to the meeting.

DATES: February 4, 5, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Leser, Program Analyst, Liaison and Policy Section, Office of 
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, Washington, D.C. 
20537, Telephone (202) 307-4026, Facsimile (202) 307-8570.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you need special accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact the Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration, 600 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, Virginia, 
22202, (202) 307-4026 at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.

    Dated: December 30, 1997.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control.
[FR Doc. 98-147 Filed 1-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Belgium (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Belgium (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar   | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct   | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | ---
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |       |     |     |     |     |     |     | 36.47 |     |    
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     | 14.05 |     |     |     |     |     |     |       |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,378 and TA-W-34,378B]


Newel Company, Acme Frame--A/K/A Intercraft; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on April 24, 1998, applicable to 
all workers of Newel Company, Acme Frame--A/K/A Intercraft, Mundelein, 
Illinois. The notice will be published soon in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information received 
by the company shows that worker separations occurred the Harrisburg, 
Arkansas plant from September 1997 until its' closing, January 1998. 
The workers produced wood and metal picture frames.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Newel Company, Acme Frame--A/K/A Intercraft adversely 
affected by increased imports of wood and metal picture frames.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover 
the workers of Newel Company, Acme Frame--A/K/A Intercraft Harrisburg, 
Arkansas.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-34,378 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Newell Company, Acme Frame, A/K/A Intercraft, 
Mundelein, Illinois (TA-W-34,378), and Harrisburg, Arkansas (TA-W-
34,378B) who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after March 5, 1997 through April 24, 2000 are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974.

    Signed at Washington D.C. this 15th day of May 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-14985 Filed 6-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(b) and section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








I, Bryn
Harman, Chief Financial Officer of HuntMountain Resources Ltd., certify
that:








1.           This
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HuntMountain Resources Ltd. fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and





2.           The
information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HuntMountain
Resources Ltd.







Date:
November 14, 2008




/s/
      Bryn Harman, CFABryn
      Harman, Chief Financial Officer
#### Com. v. Chester 6

08/16/2016

168 EAL (2016)

6

. Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 206
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Thomas, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 877]

—An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven L. Barrett, J.), rendered February 19, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Feinman and Kahn, JJ.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1678

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that public ceremonies for the admission of new citizens shall be conducted solely in

English.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. FAIRCLOTH (for himself, Mr. EXON, Mr. DURENBERGER, Mr. SIMPSON,

Mr. GREGG, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. HELMS, Mr. CRAIG, Mr.

THURMOND, and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide

that public ceremonies for the admission of new citizens

shall be conducted solely in English.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENGLISH LANGUAGE REQUIREMENT FOR

4 CEREMONIES FOR ADMISSION OF NEW CITI5 ZENS.

6 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Section 337(d) of the Immigra7 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1448(d)) is amended

8 by adding at the end ‘‘All public ceremonies in which the
2

•S 1678 IS

1 oath of allegiance is administered pursuant to this section

2 shall be conducted solely in the English language.’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall take effect 60 days after the date of

5 enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### In the Matter of Jeremy Daniel Knee, an Attorney.

[54 NYS3d 463]

Per Curiam.

Jeremy Daniel Knee was admitted to practice by this Court in 2012 and lists a business address in Jefferson City, Missouri with the Office of Court Administration. Knee now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons *(see*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department advises that it does not oppose Knee’s application.

Upon reading the affidavit of Knee sworn to November 14, 2016, and upon reading the correspondence in response by the Chief Attorney for the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined that Knee is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant his application and accept his resignation.

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that Jeremy Daniel Knee’s application for permission to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further ordered that Jeremy Daniel Knee’s name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court (see *generally*Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]); and it is further ordered that, effective immediately, Jeremy Daniel Knee is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Knee is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or *1535to hold himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further ordered that Jeremy Daniel Knee shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him.
#### In the Matter of Shamarie S., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 305]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Gayle P. Roberts, J.), entered on or about December 7, 2015, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree and attempted assault in the third degree, unanimously modified, on the facts and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the criminal mischief finding and dismissing that count of the petition, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Except as indicated, the court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. Although the court dismissed some of the charges, as the trier of fact it was entitled to disregard so much of the victim’s testimony that it found was untruthful, and accept so much of it as it found to have been truthful and accurate.

However, we dismiss the criminal mischief charge, based on a theory of recklessness, because there was no evidence that *444the neck chain taken from the victim was damaged in the amount of $250 *(see*Penal Law § 145.00 [3]).

Concur — Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb  | Mar  | Apr | May  | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ---- | ---- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -----
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |      |      |     |      |     |     |     |     |     |     | 11.14
|2023                                                                                                                              | W   | W    | 7.39 | W   | 6.54 |     | W   | W   |     | W   | W   | W    
|2024                                                                                                                              |     | 5.72 |      | W   | 5.07 |     |     |     |     |     |     |      
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED J USTIN LEVON SLADE , A ppellant ,
v. Case No

. 5D 22 -2 718 LT Cas e No s

. 2017 -C F -4 1622 -A 2017

- CF

- 416 23

- A S TATE OF FLORIDA , A ppellee

.

_

_______________________________/ D ecision filed April 11, 2023 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County , Charles G. Crawford , Judge. Justin L evon Slade, Crestview, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

P ER CURIAM. A FFIRMED.
LAMBERT, C.J

. , EISNAUGLE and HARRIS , JJ. , concur.
#### In the Matter of Daniel Dumas, Petitioner, v A. Olcott, as Correction Officer at Woodbourne Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[52 NYS3d 238]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### In the Matter of DC, Appellant, v Selfhelp Community Services, Inc., Respondent.

[55 NYS3d 650]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrea Masley, J.), entered on or about March 3, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, restored the guardianship proceeding to the calendar, reappointed the same court evaluator, and ordered an initial guardianship hearing on the petition, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the order vacated.

There was no basis to restore the proceeding, to reappoint the court evaluator or to schedule a hearing, because there was no request for this relief. Indeed, HRA has determined that DC is no longer eligible for adult protective services because she has “sufficient mental and physical capacity.”

Concur — Friedman, J.R, Renwick, Andrias, Moskowitz and Gesmer, JJ.
# L_2011100EN.01007401.xml

| 14.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 100/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 100/74

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP of 15 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 42 of 16 February 2011
  )

On page 6, Article 3(1):

for:

‘Article 3

1.   Article 2 shall not apply to:

| (a) | the sale, supply, transfer or export of non-lethal military equipment or of equipment which might be used for internal repression, intended solely for humanitarian or protective use, or for institution-building programmes of the UN and the EU, or of materiel intended for EU and UN crisis management operations; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the sale, supply, transfer or export of non-lethal military equipment or of equipment which might be used for internal repression, intended solely for humanitarian or protective use, or for institution-building programmes of the UN and the EU, or of materiel intended for EU and UN crisis management operations;

| (b) | the provision of financing and financial assistance related to such equipment; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the provision of financing and financial assistance related to such equipment;

| (c) | the provision of technical assistance related to such equipment, on condition that any export thereof has been approved in advance by the relevant competent authority.’, |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the provision of technical assistance related to such equipment, on condition that any export thereof has been approved in advance by the relevant competent authority.’,

read:

‘Article 3

1.   Article 2 shall not apply to:

| (a) | the sale, supply, transfer or export of non-lethal military equipment or of equipment which might be used for internal repression, intended solely for humanitarian or protective use, or for institution-building programmes of the UN and the EU, or of materiel intended for EU and UN crisis management operations; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the sale, supply, transfer or export of non-lethal military equipment or of equipment which might be used for internal repression, intended solely for humanitarian or protective use, or for institution-building programmes of the UN and the EU, or of materiel intended for EU and UN crisis management operations;

| (b) | the provision of financing and financial assistance related to such equipment; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the provision of financing and financial assistance related to such equipment;

| (c) | the provision of technical assistance related to such equipment, |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the provision of technical assistance related to such equipment,

on condition that any export thereof has been approved in advance by the relevant competent authority.’.

---
#### Natalia Scarlett et al., Appellants, v James P. McCarthy, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 342]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated February 11, 2003, which, inter alia, granted the defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment entered upon his default in appearing and answering.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To vacate a default, the moving party must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a meritorious cause of action *(see Weekes v Karayianakis,*304 AD2d 561 [2003]; *cf. Antoku v Grace Indus.,*295 AD2d 294 [2002]; *Fuller v Tae Kwon,*259 AD2d 662 [1999]). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse is left to the sound discretion of the court *(see Holt Constr. Corp. v J & R Music World,*294 AD2d 540 [2002]; *Matter of Gambardella v Ortov Light.,*278 AD2d 494 [2000]). Further, public policy favors a determination of controversies on their merits *(see Eastern Resource Serv. v Mountbatten Sur. Co.,*289 AD2d 283, 284 [2001]; *Darrell v Yurchuk,*174 AD2d 557 [1991]).

Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion *624in accepting the defendant’s proffered excuse that his insurance carrier was actively engaged in settlement negotiations with the plaintiff’s counsel, and that the plaintiff’s counsel never mentioned that he would be moving for leave to enter a default judgment *(see Lehrman v Lake Katonah Club,*295 AD2d 322 [2002]; *Swain v Janzen,*121 AD2d 378, 379 [1986]). Additionally, the defendant established the existence of a meritorious defense based upon the circumstances of the accident, which indicate that the plaintiff could be found at least partially at fault in the happening of the accident. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.