alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP98-8-003; and RP96-199-010]


Mississippi River Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

January 15, 1998.
    Take notice that on January 13, 1998, Mississippi River 
Transmission Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed below.

Substitute Twenty-Sixth Revised Sheet No. 5
Substitute Twenty-Sixth Revised Sheet No. 6
Substitute Twenty-Seventh Revised Sheet No. 5
Substitute Twenty-Seventh Revised Sheet No. 6
Substitute Twenty-Eighth Revised Sheet No. 5
Substitute Twenty-Eighth Revised Sheet No. 6

    MRT states that the purpose of the instant filing is to correct an 
administrative oversight in the Gas Supply Realignment Costs (GSRC) 
charge on Authorized Overrun Service (AOS) for Rate Schedules FTS and 
SCT.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1442 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Hobbins v North Star Orthopedics, PLLC

2d Dept: 148 AD3d 784

denied
#### Jianfeng Jiang, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Xue Chao Wei, Defendant, and New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 278]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered on or about January 29, 2016, which granted defendant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation’s (HHC) motion to dismiss all claims against it based on conduct prior to May 8, 2012, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff alleges that defendants were negligent in failing to timely diagnose a cancerous wound on his left leg. The motion court properly granted HHC’s motion to dismiss the claims based on conduct occurring prior to May 8, 2012, since plaintiff failed to file a timely notice of claim, in violation of General Municipal Law § 50-e (1) (a).

Plaintiff was discharged from an HHC hospital in November 2010 and did not return to an HHC hospital for treatment to his leg until May 8, 2012. During that stay, he received the cancer diagnosis. The notice of claim was filed shortly after plaintiff’s discharge from the hospital in October 2012, more than 90 days after the claim’s accrual in November 2010 *(see Allende v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*90 NY2d 333, 337 [1997]).

*556We reject plaintiff’s contention that both the November and May visits were part of a continuous course of treatment such that the statutory period for filing a notice of claim was tolled (see CPLR 214-a; *Allende,*90 NY2d at 337-338). Although it is clear that HHC anticipated further treatment by HHC at the time of discharge in 2010, it is likewise clear that plaintiff did not (see *Young v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*91 NY2d 291, 296, 297 [1998]; *Zelig v Urken,*28 AD3d 318, 318 [1st Dept 2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 708 [2006]), given his failure to show up for follow-up appointments (see *Batiste v Brooklyn Hosp. Ctr.,*255 AD2d 474, 475 [2d Dept 1998]; *Bellmund v Beth Israel Hosp.,*131 AD2d 796, 797-798 [2d Dept 1987]) and his exclusive reliance on codefendant Xue Chao Wei (an acupuncturist who plaintiff believed to be a licensed physician) for treatment during the interim period (see *Sposato v Di Giacinto,*247 AD2d 267, 267 [1st Dept 1998]; *Alverio v New York Eye & Ear Infirmary,*123 AD2d 568, 569-570 [1st Dept 1986]; *Devadas v Niksarli,*120 AD3d 1000, 1007 [1st Dept 2014]). Plaintiff’s actions indicated an intention to discontinue his relationship with HHC; his return visit must therefore be deemed a “renewal, rather than a continuation, of the physician-patient relationship” *(O’Donnell v Siegel,*49 AD3d 415, 417 [1st Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Acosta, P.J., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.
#### RMB Properties, Appellant, v American Realty Capital III, LLC, et al., Respondents.

[48 NYS3d 604]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jennifer G. Schecter, J.),’entered August 31, 2016, and said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties; and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed for the reasons stated by Schecter, J., without costs and disbursements (2016 NY Slip Op 51874[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2016]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1.  CERTIFICATION  I, Ronald W. Jibson, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report of Questar Gas Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2008;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. [intentionally omitted];  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    November 6, 2008 /s/Ronald W. Jibson Ronald W. Jibson President and Chief Executive Officer
Comments on Avenal Supplemental Statement of Basis - signed version

Paul Cort to: Shirley Rivera, R9AirPermits 04/12/2011 03:02 PM

1 attachment

Comments on Avenal Supplemental SOB.pdf
J8 Inventory Finance Workshop--An End to End partnership to pass audit
 
  By Jessica Gratkowski, DLA Distribution supply management specialist
  Defense Logistics Agency employees representing DLA Distribution, DLA headquarters J3 and J8, DLA Troop Support, DLA Land and Maritime and DLA Aviation met in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, Nov. 5-8 to kick off one of many inventory finance workshops. The goal, during this workshop and future sessions, is to map out all of DLA’s complex processes. The workshops are a result of the independent public accountant’s notice of findings and recommendations. A key discussion during the first session focused on how DLA Distribution operations impact DLA’s finances. Co-leads Ms. Karen Opie-Toler, DLA headquarters J8 and Ms. Denise Parker-Kanelos, DLA Distribution, guided the team through various operational and financial topics. Throughout the kick-off discussions, the DLA partners stressed a unified viewpoint that is critical to the success of audit. During transition into the new inventory system, warehouse management system, DLA must ensure strong information technology general controls are put into place and ‘unauditable’ and antiquated processes are not implemented. In addition to the challenges with implementing a new inventory system, DLA’s intricate business includes many different systems, transactions, codes and reports, making it difficult to map end-to-end processes. To help J8 visualize what happens within a distribution center, the group completed a walkthrough of DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, to get a firsthand look at core receiving, warehousing, inventory and transportation processes—functions which many of the DLA headquarters J8 finance personnel have never seen. Distribution lead a deep dive on its extensive end-to-end process mapping, outlining the “hand-offs” when operations, systems and finances collide. The team will work to identify the various key transactions and interfaces from the different systems and the posting logic and General Ledger accounts from DLA’s financial system, Enterprise Business System. In order to ensure end-to-end processes are documented properly, teams will be tracing test transactions through various systems in the upcoming J8 Inventory Finance Workshop sessions. Throughout the week, DLA headquarters J8 and the Supply Centers briefed several financial reports used to manage DLA’s accounting. J8 outlined the challenges and successes found in reconciling inventory balances in DLA Distribution’s current inventory system, Distribution Standard System and EBS. The inventory reconciliation work has identified many areas needing improvement. One major area identified is in transit materiel—items destined for a distribution center, shipped from a commercial vendor or from another distribution center. The teams will be working together over the next year to tackle the audit challenges identified in order to meet the future goal of a good audit result, called an “unmodified” opinion. The next J8 inventory finance workshop is scheduled to take place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, at DLA Troop Support, Nov. 18-20.
# Webinar teaches small-business owners how to contract with DLA

/ Published Sept. 10, 2019
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
The Defense Logistics Agency did $15 billion worth of contracts with small businesses in fiscal 2018 as it procured spare parts, food, fuel, uniforms, medical supplies, construction material and more for military and federal customers. Small-business owners who are new to federal procurement can learn how to partner with DLA through a monthly webinar that outlines contracting opportunities with various supply chains.

The webinar, created by the DLA Office of Small Business Programs, includes details on DLA’s mission, each DLA major subordinate command and what they buy, as well as an outline of Procurement Technical Assistance Centers that provide services ranging from guidance on the bidding process to tips for using federal procurement systems.

The free, one-hour session is designed to help Small Business Development Centers, clients of the Counselors to America’s Small Businesses Association, PTAC counselors and clients, and the small business community. 

Sessions are available at 2 p.m. on the following dates:
      - Sept. 18 
      - Oct. 9 
      - Nov. 13 
      - Dec. 11
      - Jan. 15
      - Feb. 12
      - March 11
      - April 8
      - May 13
      - June 10
      - July 8
      - Aug. 12

Webinars are held using Adobe Connect and can be accessed at the DLA Small Business Calendar. More information on the DLA Small Business Program is available at www.dla.mil/SmallBusiness.
#### MP Cool Invs. Ltd. v Forkosh

1st Dept: 142 AD3d 286

denied
|  | 1.            | Effective      as of December 31, 2007, the Exclusive Provider Option Plan is terminated      to all new Participants and all existing Participants and all such      references to the Exclusive Provider Option Plan shall be struck from the      Comprehensive Plan of GroupInsurance. |
|--|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (a)   | Alltel Corporation      Exclusive Provider OptionPlan |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)   | Alltel      Health Maintenance OrganizationsPlan; |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------|

| (c)   | Alltel      Corporation Preferred Provider Organization  Plan; |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|

| (d)   | Alltel      Corporation Prescription Drug Plan; |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------|

| (e)   | Alltel      Corporation Dental Care Plan; |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------|

| (f)   | Alltel      Corporation Supplemental Life InsurancePlan; |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------|

| (g)   | Alltel      Corporation Supplemental AD&DPlan; |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------|

| (h)   | Alltel      Corporation Basic Life and AD&D Insurance  Plan; |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (i)   | Alltel      Corporation Income Advantage BenefitPlan; |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| (j)   | Alltel      Corporation Dependent Care Plan; |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------|

| (k)   | Alltel      Corporation Medical ReimbursementPlan; |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------|

| (l)   | Alltel      Corporation Vision Care Plan; |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------|

| (m)   | Alltel      Corporation Group Accident Plan; |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------|

| (n)   | Special      Insurance Plan for Former Allied Telephone Profit Sharing      Participants; |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| (o)   | Alltel      Indemnity Plan; |
|-----------------|-----------------------------|

| (p)   | Alltel      Prior Insurance Plan; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------|

| (q)   | Any      other plans included as a constituent plan to the Comprehensive Plan of      Group Insurance from time to time |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DCB Financial Corp (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey Benton,
President and CEO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jeffrey Benton

Jeffrey Benton
President and CEO,
March 31, 2003
#### Angela Murray-Caines, Appellant, v William L. Caines, Respondent.

[53 NYS3d 533]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Doris M. Gonzalez, J.), entered on or about February 24, 2016, which, after a hearing, among other things, dismissed plaintiff wife’s petition seeking an order of protection; and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about September 26, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff’s CPLR 4404 (b) motion to set aside the prior order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Family Court properly determined that the allegations *488in the petition are not supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 832; *Matter of Everett C. v Oneida P.,*61 AD3d 489 [1st Dept 2009]). The court stated that it had reached its determination following completion of the hearing and upon consideration of both parties’ testimony *(cf. Matter of Janice M. v Terrance J.,*96 AD3d 482 [1st Dept 2012] [consideration of the petitioner’s credibility was improper on a motion to dismiss the petition for failure to prove a prima facie case]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determination that plaintiff’s testimony was not credible *(see Matter of Everett C. v Oneida P.,*61 AD3d 489 [2009]), particularly given the evidence of plaintiff’s motive to have defendant barred from the marital residence.

The Family Court properly granted defendant’s prehearing application to limit plaintiff’s proof to the allegations in the petition *(see Matter of Czop v Czop,*21 AD3d 958, 959 [2d Dept 2005]; *see also Matter of Salazar v Melendez,*97 AD3d 754 [2d Dept 2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 852 [2012]).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
DLA Fire and EMS professionals educate employees on fire safety
 
  By DLA Installation Management Richmond, Fire and Emergency Services
  Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond’s Fire and Emergency Services is teaming up with the National Fire Protection Association to promote this year’s Fire Prevention Week campaign. This year’s theme is “Not Every Hero Wears a Cape. Plan and Practice Your Escape!” NFPA statistics show that in 2017, U.S. fire departments responded to 357,000 home structure fires. These fires caused 2,630 fire deaths and 10,600 fire injuries. On average, seven people died in home fires per day during 2012 to 2016. “These numbers show that home fires continue to pose a significant threat to safety,” said Lorraine Carli, NFPA’s vice president of Outreach and Advocacy in this year’s FPW press release. “In a typical home fire, you may have as little as one to two minutes to escape safely from the time the smoke alarm sounds. Escape planning and practice can help you make the most of the time you have, giving everyone enough time to get out.” While NFPA is focused on home fire safety, these messages can apply to virtually any location.  The installation’s Fire and EMS professionals are working to educate everyone about the small but important actions they can take to keep themselves and those around them safe during emergencies. “DLA personnel should maintain a high degree of situational awareness to remain safe at work and home,” said Rick Ferrell, assistant fire chief, Fire and Emergency Services, DLA Installation Management Richmond. “No matter where you are, look for available exits. If the alarm system sounds, take it seriously and exit the building immediately.” DLA Installation Management Richmond’s F&EMS personnel are hosting a series of events in support of this year’s campaign. Some events including showcasing displays and conducting walk-throughs of installation areas by Sparky, the fire dog, who will provide valuable informational handouts on fire safety. Other scheduled events are as follows: Oct. 10 - 9:30 - 11 a.m. Betty Ackermann-Cobb Child Development Center visit at Bldg 100
Oct. 11 - 8:30 – 11 a.m. walk throughs at DLA Distribution Richmond and DLA Aviation Mapping Division To find out more about installation programs and activities, please contact the DLA Installation Management Richmond, Fire & EMS’ Fire Prevention Office at (804)279-6782 or email us at dscr.fireprevention@dla.mil.  For more information about Fire Prevention Week and home escape planning, visit www.fpw.org.
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Monthly Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Monthly                                                    
|View History: Monthly                                                    
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2024                                                                                                                              | 2,602 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Com. v. Reives.

06/28/2016

76 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d588