alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      10(j)(16)**

----

**ARTICLE      XXVI**

**TRANSFER      OF BENEFITS WITH RESPECT TO ALLTEL HOLDING CORP. (WIRELINE)      SPINOFF**

|   | 26.02 | Transfer                of Assets and Liabilities |
|--------|-------|---------------------------------------------------|

|   | 26.03 | Cessation                of Participation |
|--------|-------|-------------------------------------------|

----

|   | 26.04 | Vested                Interest of Transfer                Individuals |
|--------|-------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 26.05 | Plan                Continuing |
|--------|-------|--------------------------------|

|   | 26.06 | Overriding                Provisions |
|--------|-------|--------------------------------------|

----

| A.   | Section 1.07                is modified by adding to the definition thereof the                following: |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| B.   | Section 1.14                is modified by adding to the definition thereof the                following: |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| C.   | Section 1.37(d)(1)                is modified as follows: |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| D.   | Section 1.37(f)                is modified as follows: |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|

| E.   | Section 1.37(g)                is modified as follows: |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
# L_2011105EN.01007902.xml

| 21.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 105/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 105/79

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2011/106/CFSP of 15 February 2011 on adapting and extending the period of application of the measures in Decision 2002/148/EC concluding consultations with Zimbabwe under Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 43 of 17 February 2011
  )

In the contents on the cover page and on page 31, title of the Decision:

for:

‘Council Decision 2011/106/CFSP of 15 February 2011 ...’,

read:

‘Council Decision 2011/106/EU of 15 February 2011 ...’.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Noel Torres, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 265]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Ward, J.), rendered January 25, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
# Women’s History Month Spotlight: Deborah Youngblood

/ Published March 2, 2020
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
*Editor’s note: The Defense Logistics Agency recognizes March as Women’s History Month. In honor of women’s contributions to the agency’s global mission, DLA is highlighting female employees who work day in and day out to provide logistics support to America’s warfighters.*

**My name is:** Deborah Youngblood

**I am:** A traffic management specialist for DLA Headquarters

**Describe your job in a sentence:** I serve as a DLA Distribution customer liaison for transportation operations, solutions and opportunities, providing transportation planning, guidance, and advice to internal counterparts and external customers including distribution depots, supply centers, vendors, and military and Foreign Military Sales customers.

**How long have you worked at DLA?** I’ve been with the transportation team at DLA Headquarters for over five years, but I started my career in 2008 as a distribution process worker at DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania. I’ve held various positions throughout my career, all of which enabled me to build a network and strengthen my skills and knowledge relating to all aspects of distribution.  

**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?** I enjoy the daily satisfaction of knowing I come to work to supply our customers and service members with what they need to complete their own missions and assignments. I also value the relationships I’ve built and continue to build throughout my career. I’ve been fortunate to work with strong leaders and dynamic teams, all of whom remain focused on doing what’s best for the agency and those we support.

**What are your best memories of working here?**The camaraderie among the teams I’ve been part of and the outcomes of the work performed. I have worked several projects, including supporting the Federal Emergency Management Agency in areas that were affected by natural disasters, where we’ve had to maintain focus and work under highly stressful circumstances. It’s those times that I find most memorable as I reflect on the bonds, strength and coordination among those teams and how it all aided in successful projects. 

**How do you make a difference?** Customer service is my No. 1 priority. I take pride in the fact that I work hard, remain calm and use my expertise during intense situations while assisting customers who are often up against tight timelines. I believe in going the extra mile and I often take on extra assignments. I help ensure my colleagues are trained and have the tools they need to fulfill their roles.

**What does Women’s History Month mean to you?** I view Women’s History Month as an opportunity to reflect on women who have been leaders, who had a drive to effect change in society and have achieved success for the greater good.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rory Dolan, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 655]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), rendered January 5, 1994, convicting him of criminal trespass in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, “[t]he motion court properly declined to suppress the identification evidence. Since, in their seated positions, [the] defendant and the fillers appeared to possess roughly similar heights and weights, and since they were otherwise sufficiently similar in appearance, the lineup was not unduly suggestive” *(People v Brock,*293 AD2d 294 [2002]). In any event, the evidence supported a finding that the witnesses had an independent source for the in-court identification of the defendant *(see People v Bouchereau,*255 AD2d 389 [1998]).

The trial court properly denied the defendant’s speedy trial motion pursuant to CPL 30.30. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the People’s motion to direct him to participate in a lineup and for exemplars was not an accusatory instrument that commenced this criminal action *(see*CPL 1.20 [1], [17]; *People v Giusti,*176 Misc 2d 377 [1998]). The trial court also properly denied the defendant’s speedy trial motion on constitutional grounds. The extent of the delay was only about 10 months, for which the People showed good cause; the nature of *745the underlying charges, which included rape, burglary, and sexual assault, was severe, even though a mistrial was ultimately declared as to these crimes; the defendant was already in prison for unrelated charges; and there was no indication that the defense had been impaired by reason of the delay *(see People v Hayes,*307 AD2d 548 [2003]; *People v Beyah,*302 AD2d 981 [2003]; *People v Mitchell,*301 AD2d 451 [2003]; *People v Jones,*267 AD2d 250 [1999]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are not preserved for appellate review, without merit, or constitute harmless error in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]). Krausman, J.P., McGinity, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
# Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Norfolk celebrates employees with special luncheon

/ Published Oct. 29, 2019
NORFOLK, Va., 
To kick off the new fiscal year, Navy Capt. Thomas Neville, III, commander, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Norfolk, Virginia, held a luncheon in honor of the employees Oct. 1.

Under a nearly perfect fall day sky with warm temperatures, DDNV employees enjoyed hotdogs, chips and beverages together while Kyle Gray, DDNV employee, entertained the crowd with a varied music selection prompting people to get up and dance. 

“Our employee appreciation luncheon brings everyone together, it builds morale and fosters esprit de corps. What better way to start off the fiscal year than to emphasize the role of the TEAM (Together Everyone Achieves More) in support of the Warfighter,” said Neville.
# DLA Troop Support provides 96,000 meals and 1,400 cases of bottled water to Hurricane Dorian relief efforts 

/ Published Sept. 12, 2019
PHILADELPHIA, 
As the threat of Hurricane Dorian became imminent, the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Subsistence supply chain began ensuring meals-ready-to-eat, bottled water and fresh fruits and vegetables were available to those directly impacted by the storm, starting August 29.Subsistence has provided nearly 96,000 MREs to various Department of Defense customers, and 1 million commercial shelf stable meals to the Federal Emergency Management Agency at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama and Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Kaushal Desai, Subsistence Individual Rations chief, said.Within the first 24 hours of support, Subsistence also worked with vendors to deliver more than half of the 1,400 cases of bottled water requested by the customer, Lauren Ginsberg, Subsistence supply chain garrison feeding branch chief, said.“We provided Subsistence prime vendor support in terms of moving deliveries forward ahead of the anticipated storm, as well as an additional 1,400 cases of bottled water for troops at Fort Bragg,” Ginsberg said. “We provided 246 cases of Gatorade to Marine recruits evacuated from Parris Island to Albany, Ga.”Since the initial customer requests for hurricane relief support, Subsistence has worked diligently with vendors to expedite orders without impacting normal business operations, Desai said.“We work closely with our depot counterparts to make sure expedited transportation is arranged quickly for these deliveries,” Desai said. “Most of the support was provided within 24 to 48 hours from start to finish.”To date, Subsistence has provided over $5 million worth of product to Hurricane Dorian relief efforts, he said.“In Subsistence, we think nothing is impossible. We provide support across the globe on a daily basis,” Desai said. “We are ready to support the warfighter as well as any other [customer], any day, any time.”
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5899 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5899

**Commission Decision of 02/07/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5899 - WARBURG PINCUS / SILVER LAKE / INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 02.07.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/9914/9915

C(2010) 4722

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5899 - WARBURG PINCUS / SILVER LAKE / INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION Notification of 31.05.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 151, 10.06.2010, p.8

1. On 31.05.2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Silver Lake Partners III, L.P. controlled by Silver Lake Group L.L.C. ("Silver Lake", United States of America) and Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P. and Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P., together controlled by Warburg Pincus & Co. ("Warburg Pincus", United States of America), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking Interactive Data Corporation (United States of America) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Silver Lake: global investment funds focused on technology, technology-enabled and related growth industries;

- for Warburg Pincus: global private equity;

- for Interactive Data Corporation: provision of financial data, analytics and related solutions.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission,

(signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
No. 12-8075.

#### Anderson *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7144.

#### Muthukumar *v.*University of Texas at Dallas.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
2017-1119.

#### Specialty Executives, Inc. v. KDH Defense Sys., Inc.

Morrow App. No. 16CA0012, 2017-Ohio-4399. On motion to stay. Motion granted. Execution of judgment and disbursement of bond are stayed pending the court’s disposition of this appeal.

O’Connor, C.J., and French and DeWine, JJ., dissent.
#### Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P., Appellant, v Lyndon Forde, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 878]—

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Joseph C. Pastoressa, J.), dated August 20, 2014. The order denied the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 2308 (a), in effect, for the issuance of a warrant of arrest to bring the defendant before the Supreme Court, upon his alleged failure to comply with a postjudgment judicial subpoena duces tecum dated October 23, 2013, and an order of contempt of that court dated March 6, 2014.

Ordered that the order dated August 20, 2014, is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 2308 (a), in effect, for the issuance of a warrant of arrest to bring the defendant before the Supreme Court, upon his alleged failure to comply with a postjudgment judicial subpoena duces tecum dated October 23, 2013, and an order of contempt of that court dated March 6, 2014 *(see Rackowicz v Feldman,*22 AD3d 553, 553-554 [2005]). CPLR 2308 (a) sets forth the penalties applicable to the disobedience of a judicial subpoena. The available penalties include the issuance of “a warrant directing a sheriff to bring the witness into court” (CPLR 2308 [a]). Here, the court declined to issue such a warrant, finding that the plaintiff could avail itself of “all other remedies pursuant to the CPLR to collect” a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. We find no basis in the record to disturb that determination.

Rivera, J.P., Sgroi, Miller and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of Mestek, Inc. (the “Company”), that, to his knowledge: 

 

 (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: May 15, 2006

 

/s/ John E. Reed                                                                            

John E. Reed

Chief Executive Officer 

 

/s/ Stephen M. Shea                                                                      

Stephen M. Shea

Chief Financial Officer 

 

This certification is not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### Com. v. Riley

09/06/2016

164 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1026
#### Com. v. Srock

08/10/2016

175 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 586
# Marines converge on Defense Supply Center Richmond for three-day course 

/ Published Nov. 5, 2019
RICHMOND, VA, 
Close to 45 Marines, sailors and Department of Defense civilians from around the country and as far away as Japan, converged on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, for the Defense Logistics Agency Marine Aviation Wholesale Resident Course Oct. 28-30. This is the second year the course was held in Richmond.

Personnel working within the United States Marine Corps Customer Facing Division, Customer Operations Directorate and other divisions and directorates within Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, lectured on a number of topics including national stock number management, material and demand planning, pre-and post-awards and weapons systems program management.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            BD
<CIK>                                        0000065596
<NAME>                          SIEBERT FINANCIAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                          USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1998 
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1 
<CASH>                                        4,523,375 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   890,047 
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                   0 
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                 0 
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                          11,049,141 
<PP&E>                                          563,538 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               23,025,649 
<SHORT-TERM>                                          0 
<PAYABLES>                                    6,083,486 
<REPOS-SOLD>                                          0 
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                   0 
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                            2,091,406 
<LONG-TERM>                                   3,000,000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0 
<PREFERRED>                                           0 
<COMMON>                                        209,964 
<OTHER-SE>                                   11,640,793 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 23,025,649 
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               767,441 
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            317,892 
<COMMISSIONS>                                 9,301,346 
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                 2,965,726 
<FEE-REVENUE>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              192,664 
<COMPENSATION>                                4,652,625 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               3,645,684 
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    3,645,684 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0 
<CHANGES>                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  2,168,684 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .10 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .10 
                                                        
                                          

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
        23.1
  [DELOITTE
        TOUCHE TOHMATSU LETTERHEAD]
 
 
 CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
        333-13320, No. 333-10312, and No. 333-132736 of Highway Holdings Limited on
        Form S-8 of our report relating to the consolidated financial statements
        of
        Highway Holdings Limited dated June 28 2008, appearing in the Annual Report
        on
        Form 20-F of Highway Holdings Limited for the year ended March 31,
        2008.
 
 
 /s/
        Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
 
 Hong
        Kong
 June
        28,
        2008
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-20341

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RANDALL COREY BORDEN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CR-253-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Randall Corey Borden has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Borden has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-20341 Document: 00513884114 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
No. 16-20341

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-20341 Document: 00513884114 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017