alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jose Delgado, Respondent, v 5008 Broadway Associates, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[50 NYS3d 282]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered on or about January 20, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of defendant 5008 Broadway Associates, LLC (5008 Broadway) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly found that 5008 Broadway failed to meet its prima facie burden of showing that it bore no liability for plaintiff’s fall over a defect in the area of the public sidewalk abutting its property *(see*Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-210). The photographic and testimonial evidence submitted failed to clarify whether the defect lay entirely within the pedestrian ramp, which is the City’s responsibility, or on the sidewalk flag, which is 5008 Broadway’s responsibility *(see Puello v Georges Units, LLC,*146 AD3d 561 [1st Dept 2017]; *Gary v 101 Owners Corp.,*89 AD3d 627 [1st Dept 2011]). The evidence also did not eliminate the possibility that 5008 Broadway’s failure to maintain the sidewalk proximately *584caused plaintiff’s injuries by leaving a tripping hazard between the sidewalk and the pedestrian ramp *(see Sangaray v West Riv. Assoc., LLC,*26 NY3d 793, 799-800 [2016]).

Concur— Acosta, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
# Employee helps pay Prince William County families’ school lunch debt

/ Published July 13, 2020
MANASSAS, Va., 
Debbie Roulier works toward the Defense Logistics Agency Information Operations mission every day, but volunteering for a nonprofit organization that pays off school lunch debt for families in Prince William County, Virginia, is just as important to her.Roulier became interested in the cause in June 2017 after seeing a news story about the organization’s founder, Adelle Settle, a Prince William County mother campaigning to pay off lunch debt. Roulier connected with Settle on Facebook and now serves as a board member and social media coordinator for the organization, which raised $25,000 to pay off lunch debt for 285 families by the end of that summer.“As the mother of two children, now older, I feel incredibly fortunate my husband and I were able to afford the basic necessities for them,” Roulier said. “Paying for something like a school lunch is something that most of us take for granted, but I know others struggle to do that.”Roulier spread word about the campaign by reaching out to media outlets in the Washington, D.C., area. The campaign was featured on two TV stations, a local radio station and in two local newspapers.“Just because a child’s family struggles to pay for breakfast or lunch, the child should not be denied something that is basic to their well-being and health,” Roulier said.Roulier manage the organization’s social media presence on Twitter and Instagram, routinely updating them with debt totals and names of schools whose families’ debts are paid off by community donors.The organization temporarily stopped fundraising in March when schools closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In May, members received an updated spreadsheet showing lunch debt balances totaled $380,000, $60,000 higher than the original debt in November.“I was stunned by the news and so sad,” Roulier said.Organization members began fundraising again, determined to help families who were struggling.“We have an incredibly talented and generous group of volunteers on the board. Times are tough for everyone, but I know we’ll do all we can to help as many schools as possible,” Roulier said, adding that she’s proud to be part of the effort.The organization paid off lunch debt for families of 24 schools June 29 when it presented a check for $45,601 to Prince William County Schools Food and Nutrition Services. Members have helped pay off about $145,000 of lunch debt since 2017. They also worked with Virginia House Delegate Danica Roem to introduce state legislation that took effect July 1 to ban lunch shaming, the singling out of students with past-due lunch bills.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2373

LINDA G. MORRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA03-2856-RDB)

Submitted: May 31, 2005 Decided: June 20, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Allen F.

Loucks, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Linda G. Morris appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her employment

discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Morris v. Secretary, HHS, No. CA-03-2856-

RDB (D. Md. Sept. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2011276EN.01004601.xml

| 21.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 276/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 276/46

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2011/697/CFSP

of 20 October 2011

amending Decision 2011/621/CFSP extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative to the African Union

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28, Article 31(2) and Article 33 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 6 December 2007, the Council adopted Joint Action 2007/805/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Koen VERVAEKE as European Union Special Representative (EUSR) to the African Union (AU). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 6 December 2007, the Council adopted Joint Action 2007/805/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Koen VERVAEKE as European Union Special Representative (EUSR) to the African Union (AU).

| (2) | On 21 September 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/621/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 30 June 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 21 September 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/621/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 30 June 2012.

| (3) | A new EUSR to the AU should be appointed for the period from 1 November 2011 until 30 June 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

A new EUSR to the AU should be appointed for the period from 1 November 2011 until 30 June 2012.

| (4) | Decision 2011/621/CFSP should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2011/621/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 1 of Decision 2011/621/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘Article 1

European Union Special Representative

1.   The mandate of Mr Koen VERVAEKE as EUSR to the AU is hereby extended until 31 October 2011.

2.   Mr Gary QUINCE is hereby appointed as EUSR to the AU for the period from 1 November 2011 until 30 June 2012.

3.   The mandate of the EUSR may be terminated earlier, if the Council so decides, on a proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR).’.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 20 October 2011.

For the Council

The President

M. SAWICKI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 323, 8.12.2007, p. 45.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 243, 21.9.2011, p. 19.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14399]



[[Page 29388]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS


Amendment of Visa Requirements for Certain Cotton and Man-Made 
Fiber Textile Products Produced or Manufactured in Guatemala

May 27, 1998.
AGENCY: Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA).

ACTION: Issuing a directive to the Commissioner of Customs amending 
visa requirements.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roy Unger, International Trade 
Specialist, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, (202) 482-4212.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Authority: Section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 1956, as 
amended (7 U.S.C. 1854); Executive Order 11651 of March 3, 1972, as 
amended.

    Effective on May 31, 1998, textile products in Categories 342/642, 
produced or manufactured in Guatemala and exported on or after May 31, 
1998, will no longer require a visa. In addition, products in 
Categories 342/642 will no longer be subject to the Special Access 
Program.
    A description of the textile and apparel categories in terms of HTS 
numbers is available in the CORRELATION: Textile and Apparel Categories 
with the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (see Federal 
Register notice 62 FR 66057, published on December 17, 1997). Also see 
55 FR 3079, published on January 30, 1990.
Troy H. Cribb,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.

Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements
May 27, 1998.

Commissioner of Customs,
Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC 20229.

    Dear Commissioner: This directive amends, but does not cancel, 
the directive issued to you on January 24, 1990, as amended, by the 
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements. 
That directive directs you to prohibit entry of certain cotton and 
man-made fiber textile products, produced or manufactured in 
Guatemala which were not properly visaed by the Government of 
Guatemala.
    Effective on May 31, 1998, you are directed to no longer require 
a visa for shipments of textile products in Categories 342/642 which 
are produced or manufactured in Guatemala and exported on or after 
May 31, 1998. In addition, products in Categories 342/642 will no 
longer be subject to the Special Access Program.
    The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements has 
determined that these actions fall within the foreign affairs 
exception of the rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1).
    Sincerely,
Troy H. Cribb,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. 98-14399 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-F
#### In the Matter of Michael Kunz, M.D., Respondent, v Shahadoth C., Appellant.

[56 NYS3d 461]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Ruth Feinman, J.), entered June 16, 2016, which granted the petition and authorized petitioner to involuntarily administer medical treatment to respondent for up to six months, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

By its own terms, the order which respondent seeks to challenge expired on December 16, 2016. Furthermore, it is undisputed that, in November 2016, respondent was transferred to another medical facility, and petitioner no longer has any direct stake in respondent’s medical treatment. Accordingly, the order is moot, and, under the circumstances presented, the exception to the mootness doctrine is inapplicable *(see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]).

Concur—Friedman, J.R, Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

The Decision and Order of this Court entered herein on March 28, 2017 (148 AD3d 600 [2017]) is hereby recalled and vacated *(see*2017 NY Slip Op 72494[U] [2017] [decided simultaneously herewith]).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2442

LA’TILA D. ABBOTT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARKETSTAR CORP.,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

PHILLIPE AQUILINA; MARKETING WERKS; CYNTHIA SNOOT; ROSALIN 

H. HALL-SMITH; EEOC,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:13-cv-00143-HEH-MHL)

Submitted: March 25, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

La’Tila D. Abbott, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Eugene Blue, RAY, 

QUINNEY & NEBEKER, PC, Salt Lake City, Utah; Tillman J. 

Breckenridge, REED SMITH, LLP, Washington, DC; Betty S. W. 

Graumlich, Robert Miltz Luck, III, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, 
2

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

La’Tila D. Abbott appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Abbott v. Marketstar Corp., No. 3:13-cv-00143-HEH-MHL 

(E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2013). We deny Abbott’s pending petitions for 

mandamus, for a jury trial, and to enjoin a non-party from 

filing documents in this appeal, and her pending motion to 

suppress, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
# DLA Energy tests command, control with COOP exercise

/ Published April 22, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
In response to the coronavirus pandemic, Defense Logistics Agency Energy activated a Continuity of Operations plan to test command and control operations April 15. 

The COOP plan, as directed by Federal Continuity Directive 1, requires DLA Energy to train and exercise contingency operations in preparation for a catastrophic event that prevents employees from using the McNamara Headquarters Complex at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. It enables essential employees to relocate at a predetermined location to perform mission essential functions or to remotely support the mission through telework. 

DLA Energy Deputy Commander Eric W. Smith and three other employees participated in the one-day exercise using phone, video teleconferencing and email to conduct daily business. 

Equipped with communications and critical information systems, DLA Energy’s COOP location gives Energy employees a functional workspace with computers, network drops and desks to perform essential functions for up to 30 days. 

“Using this site enables DLA Energy to practice and maintain our command and control functions in case of an incident,” said DLA Energy Customer Operations Director Air Force Col. James McClellan. “We have a commander with a global mission who needs to make sound and timely decisions, successfully execute decisions and have unity of effort over this complex environment.”

Rick Vanschoor, DLA Energy’s COOP manager, maintains the roster of emergency essential employees who are on 24-hour notice to activate during COOP operations.

“In March, a positive case of COVID-19 shut down the DLA Troop Support Headquarters for 10 days to clean and disinfect office spaces,” Vanschoor said. ”Our leadership made the decision to activate our COOP for ‘split operations’ on April 1st to be fully prepared to take on fulltime operations in the event Headquarters DLA shuts down.”

Events such as hurricanes and floods can trigger COOP activation. In September 2018, DLA Energy employees activated its COOP plan when Hurricane Florence, a Category 4 hurricane, made landfall and caused severe damage near the southeastern coast of North Carolina. DLA Energy Task Force Americas managed fuel support to the Federal Emergency Management Agency from its temporary site.

All DLA activities are required to prepare and test their COOP plans every two years.
No. 12-8114.

#### Duncan *v.*Texas.

Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Certiorari denied.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00198-CV

Maria MEDINA,

Appellant

v.

Randall Howard BENDELE and Benke Septic Systems,

Appellees

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 06-08-25,379-CV

Honorable Mickey R. Pennington, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 1, 2008

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, the motion is granted

and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f). Costs of the appeal are taxed

against the parties who incurred them.

PER CURIAM
#### Com. v. Ritchey

12/01/2015

294 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1135
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 7.61   | 7.12  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6.59   | 8.06   | 11.03  | 7.21   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2016-1671.

#### Simons v. Buldas.

Lucas App. No. L-15-1316, 2016-Ohio-7111.
<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1



     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Morgan's Foods, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
                  period ended November 9, 2003, (the "Report"), which this
                  certification accompanies, fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




                                               /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Leonard R. Stein-Sapir,
                                               Chairman of the Board and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
December 23, 2003



                                       17
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiariesof Euramax International, Inc.**
| Company                                   | ** ** | ** **                               | ** ** | **Beneficial Owner** |
|-------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------|
| Amerimax UK, Inc.                    |       | Euramax International  Holdings Limited  |
| Amerimax Fabricated  Products, Inc.  |       | Euramax  International, Inc.        |
| Amerimax Home  Products, Inc.        |       | Amerimax  Fabricated Products, Inc. |
| Amerimax Diversified  Products, Inc. |       | Amerimax Fabricated Products, Inc.  |
| Amerimax Building  Products, Inc.    |       | Amerimax Fabricated Products, Inc.  |
| Amerimax Richmond  Company, Inc.     |       | Amerimax Fabricated Products, Inc.  |
| Amerimax Finance  Company, Inc.      |       | Amerimax Fabricated Products, Inc.  |
| Berger Bros Company                       |       | Berger Financial Corp.                   |
| Berger  Holdings, Ltd.                    |       | Amerimax Fabricated Products, Inc.  |
| Fabral  Holdings, Inc.               |       | Amerimax Fabricated Products, Inc.  |
| Fabral, Inc.                         |       | Fabral Holdings, Inc.               |
| Euramax European  Holdings Limited        |       | Euramax International Limited            |
| Euramax Europe Limited                    |       | Euramax European Holdings Limited        |
| Euramax Holdings Limited                  |       | Euramax Europe Limited                   |
| Euramax Coated Products  Limited          |       | Euramax Holdings Limited                 |
| Ellbee Limited                            |       | Euramax Holdings Limited                 |
| Euramax International  Holdings B.V.      |       | Euramax International, Inc.         |
| Euramax European  Holdings B.V.           |       | Euramax Continental Limited              |
| Euramax Netherlands B.V.                  |       | Euramax European Holdings B.V.           |
| Euramax Europe B.V.                       |       | Euramax Netherlands B.V.                 |
| Euramax Coated Products B.V.              |       | Euramax Europe B.V.                      |
| Euramax Industries S.A.                   |       | Euramax European Holdings B.V./          |
|                                      |       | Euramax International Limited            |
| Euramax Continental Limited               |       | Euramax International Limited            |
| Euramax International  Limited            |       | Euramax International Holdings Limited   |
| Euramax  International Holdings Limited   |       | Euramax International, Inc.         |

 

1

----