alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summarized financial information extracted
from the Questar Gas Company Statements of Income and Balance Sheets for
the period ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,233
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,539
<PP&E>                                         900,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                 365,909
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 622,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,774
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,974
<OTHER-SE>                                     206,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   622,801
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               266,176
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  209,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,333
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,333
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# L_2011146EN.01002101.xml

| 1.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 146/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 146/21

---

Declaration by the Republic of Poland on Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union

In accordance with Article 28(2), the Republic of Poland hereby declares that, in cases where the final judgment is issued within 3 years following the date of entry into force, the Republic of Poland will, as an issuing and an executing State, continue to apply the legal instruments on the transfer of sentenced persons applicable prior to entry into force of the Framework Decision.

---
No. 12-8310.

#### Fox *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
# DLA Distribution Commanding Officer's Veterans Day message

/ Published Nov. 8, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
As Veterans Day approaches, I hope you’re all able to connect in some way with the brave service members of our present and past. We can all better value the freedoms we have because of the men and women who serve and have served in defense of our nation. There are currently nearly 20 million veterans living among us, in every state and territory. And, nearly 40% of the DLA Distribution workforce are veterans. So if you look to your left and right at work, you’ll likely see a veteran working alongside you. 

Since “service” is the theme of Veterans Day 2019, I’d like to highlight one of the many veterans who contribute to DLA Distribution every day. Retired Navy Petty Officer 1st Class, Walter Floyd is 72 years-old and has spent the last decade working as a distribution process worker at DLA Distribution Albany, Georgia. Walt works in the warehouse section, completing picks, stows and re-warehousing actions. His service didn’t stop when his uniform came off and his time in active duty ended. Like many veterans who work for DLA and other organizations throughout the world, Walt took the lessons he learned and the experiences he gained in his 20 years of faithful service to our country and continues to serve our nation. 

Ms. Gonzales and I would like to extend our gratitude to all the veterans currently working for DLA Distribution, as well as the wives, husbands, mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, cousins and other relatives of veterans. And thank you to those who give back to your communities as well—working to make improvements and giving back every day.

In addition, we extend a thank you to the entire DLA Distribution Team for your work to keep our Warfighters well supplied. I am proud to be part of this great team that works tirelessly every day to support the many men and women, both military and civilian, deployed worldwide...there are none better!

Please relax and enjoy the upcoming holiday, remember to thank a veteran for their service and keep safety in mind in everything you do. You’re a valuable member of the Distribution team!

HOOYAH Distribution!

Kevin JonesRDML, SC, USN
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Robert L. Demorest, certify that:

 

1.      I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MOCON, Inc.;

 

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.      The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)      Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)      Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)      All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  November 14, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Robert L. Demorest                |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert L. Demorest                    |   |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |   |
|                                       |        |  |

 

----
http://www.dji.com/product/phantom - 3/download
#### Jonathan Bloostein et al., Plaintiffs, v Morrison Cohen LLP et al., Defendants. Morrison Cohen LLP et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v Stonebridge Capital, LLC, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendant. (And a Fourth-Party Action.)

[66 NYS3d 120]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered July 12, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted third-party defendant Stone-bridge Capital, LLC’s motion to dismiss the claim for contribution as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants/third-party plaintiffs are not entitled to contribution, because plaintiffs (investors) seek to recover for purely economic loss resulting from a breach of contract *(Board of Educ. of Hudson City School Dist. v Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw*
      *433
      *& Folley,*71 NY2d 21 [1987]; *Children’s Corner Learning Ctr. v A. Miranda Contr. Corp.,*64 AD3d 318, 324 [1st Dept 2009]).

The allegations that third-party defendant Stonebridge, a financial servicer, signed transaction documents without reviewing them or alerting other parties to a last-minute change fall squarely within the scope of Stonebridge’s contractual duties to assist investors in the execution of the transaction. The third-party complaint fails to allege that Stonebridge owed a duty of reasonable care to the investors independent of their agreement *(see Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v Levine, Levine & Meyrowitz, CPAs, P.C.,*66 AD3d 514 [1st Dept 2009]; *see also New York Univ. v Continental Ins. Co.,*87 NY2d 308, 319-320 [1995]).

Nor did Stonebridge’s role as a financial services provider give rise to an extra-contractual duty of care *(Starr v Fuoco Group LLP,*137 AD3d 634 [1st Dept 2016], *lv dismissed*28 NY3d 1083 [2016]). Further, the investors expressly acknowledged in their agreement with Stonebridge that, with respect to its work structuring the subject transaction, it was not a fiduciary, and they were not relying on it for legal, tax, or accounting advice.

We have considered third-party plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Richter, J.R, Tom, Kapnick, Kern and Moulton, JJ.
2017-0052.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Niehaus.

Sua sponte, Daniel Alan Niehaus, Attorney Registration No. 0078682, last known business address in Independence, Kentucky, found in contempt for failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before March 13, 2017.
From: Mohan Nagavedu [mnagavedu@aqmd.gov]

Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 4:31 PM

To: Adams, Lucy H.

Cc: Mulrine.Phil@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Chrome Source Test Reports

‐ 2 of 3

Attachments: Decore Plating_2001.pdf; Domar Precision_1995.pdf; EME Inc_2000.pdf;

Hightower Plating_1997.pdf; Markland Manufacturing Inc_2005.pdf;

Maxima_2007 and 2008.pdf; Microplate_1999.pdf; Moog_2002.pdf; Product

Engineering_1999.pdf; Sigma Plating_2002.pdf

Hi Lucy / Phil

Please see attached the scanned summaries and evaluation reports from the list you provided.

Due to the size I am sending in separate e

‐ mails

. Also, we are working on compiling more current

reports for source tests at the same facilities.

Thanks,

Complied by Eric Padilla

===========================================

P. Eric Padilla

Air Quality Engineer

SCAQMD, Source Test Engineering

21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765

(909)396

‐ 2265

(909)396

‐ 2099 Fax

epadilla@aqmd.gov

===========================================
# Scholarships available for students of Defense Logistics Agency employees

/ Published April 10, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
The DLA Foundation is offering scholarships to students who have a close family connection to a current or past civilian or military Defense Logistics Agency employee.Scholarship applications are being accepted now. The application period will close April 20 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. Award announcements will occur by early June.Up to 30 scholarships of $1,500 each will be awarded. Merit and financial need are the main criteria upon which applications will be judged.Criteria for applicants includes a close family connection as a child, stepchild, grandchild, niece or nephew of a current or former DLA military or civilian employee. Applicants must be U.S. citizens and high school seniors or college students who will attend an undergraduate school or trade/technical school as a full-time student in academic year 2020-2021 (12 semester hours). Appointees to military service academies are not eligible. Students must have at least a minimum 3.0 grade point average and high school seniors must have a minimum SAT score of 1000 or ACT score of 20. The Free Application for Federal Student Aid Student Aid Report will be used to determine financial need. The maximum expected family contribution in the FASFA that will be considered is 15,000.The DLA Foundation scholarships are made possible through the foundation’s fundraising activities, such as a golf outing normally held in September, a beer tasting, normally held in December; and through other donations to the foundation.In addition to scholarships from the Foundation’s general fund, there are two sponsored scholarships:
      - A $2,500 scholarship will be awarded through the Major General Charles R. Henry Scholarship to a current or former DLA military wounded warrior or his/her spouse, child, or grandchild.
      - A $2,000 scholarship will be awarded through a donor-funded scholarship in honor of Mr. Frank Lotts for a child, stepchild, grandchild, niece, or nephew of a current or former DLA military or civilian employee who is pursuing a degree in Science, Technology, Engineering, or Math (STEM).

Application forms and documents are available at the DLA Foundation website. Detailed guidance for applicants is available (Employees may need to access the directions on a non-DLA computer).The DLA Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization not affiliated with the Department of Defense.
```

[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14485]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-553-000]

Midcoast Interstate Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

May 27, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 14, 1998, as supplemented on May 22, 1998, 
Midcoast Interstate Transmission, Inc. (MIT), 3230 Second Street, 
Muscle Shoals, Alabama 35661, filed a prior notice request with the 
Commission in Docket No. CP98-553-000 pursuant to section 157.205 of 
the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for 
authorization to install and operate a new delivery point and 
appurtenant facilities in Morgan County, Alabama, under MIT's blanket 
certificates issued in Docket No. CP85-359-000 pursuant to Section 7 of 
the NGA, all as more fully set forth in the request which is open to 
the public for inspection.
    MIT proposes to install and operate a new delivery point under a 
transportation agreement with Bailey-PVS Oxides (Decatur), L.L.C. 
(Bailey). MIT states that it would install two hot taps on its mainline 
transmission system in Morgan County approximately 250 feet of 2-inch 
diameter pipe from the hot taps to the delivery point, a sales meter, 
and a regulator station. MIT states that it would construct the 
proposed delivery point facilities at a cost of $93,063 in order to 
deliver approximately 1,000 dekatherm equivalents of natural gas per 
day to Bailey pursuant to Rate Schedule IT of MIT's FERC Gas Tariff. 
MIT also states that Bailey has contracted for firm transportation 
service with MIT via the proposed delivery point once the looping 
facilities that MIT has requested approval for in Docket No. CP98-247-
000 are authorized and operational. MIT further states that the 
addition of the proposed delivery point is not prohibited by its FERC 
Gas Tariff and that addition of the delivery point would not have any 
adverse impact on a daily or annual basis upon MIT's existing 
customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14485 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
No. 12-7832.

#### Williams *v.*City of Natchitoches, Louisiana, et al.

Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
2016-1632.

#### Locigno v. 425 W. Bagley, Inc.

Cuyahoga App. No. 103379, 2016-Ohio-5924.

O’Donnell, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.
No. 12-8849.

#### Weatherspoon v. United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
---

---

Exhibit 10.11

CONSENT OF
  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-6992, 333-10724,
No. 333-13708 and No. 333-101979) of our report dated, February 17, 2004 (except Note 16 for which
the date is March 17, 2004) with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TTI Team Telecom
International Ltd. included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

|Tel-Aviv, Israel
March 30, 2004 |  | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
KOST FORER         GABBAY & KASIERER A         Member of Ernst & Young Global
|------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1

---

---
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 26, 2011

Mr. Carlos Escobar

Escobar Law Firm, PLLC

2415 North 10th Street

McAllen, TX 78501

Mr. Michael D. Conner

Hirsch & Westheimer , P.C.

700 Louisiana, Suite 2550

Houston, TX 77002-2728

RE:Case Number:  10-0659

Court of Appeals Number:  13-08-00612-CV

Trial Court Number:  CL-04-2142-B

Style:JERRY L. BARTH

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinion at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/082611.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@txcourts.gov or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 10-0659Page 1**
EVR Timeline (updated June 

Dotted box: time between start of 4-year clock and operative dateStart of solid bar: date required for new or modified facilities (operative End of solid bar: date required for existing facilities (installed before staNot required for dispensers installed before April 2003 

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 

April Sep

Jul Jan April April Sep JanMar Sep 

Mar

ORVR (>2.0 mil gal/yr)

ORVR (>1.0 mil gal/yr)

ORVR (<1.0 mil gal/yr)

Phase II EVR Standards & S

Liquid Retention - 10

Nozzle Spitting

Spillage

Dripless Nozzle

ISD (>1.8 millio

IS

Unihose Dispen

Phase I EVR System

Liquid Retention - 350 ml
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 94 (Friday, May 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12966]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS), Subcontracting Policies and Procedures--DFARS Part 
244; OMB Number 0704-0253.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 90.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 90.
    Average Burden per Response: 16 hours.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,400.
    Needs and Uses: The collection of this information is considered by 
the administrative contracting officer before making a decision on 
granting, withholding, or withdrawing purchasing system approval at the 
conclusion of a contractor purchasing system review. Withdrawal of 
purchasing system approval would necessitate Government consent to 
individual subcontracts in accordance with section 44.102 of the 
Federal Acquisition Regulation. The information collection includes the 
requirements of DFARS 244.305-70, which requires the administrative 
contracting officer, at the completion of the in-plant portion of the 
contractor purchasing system review, to request the contractor to 
submit within 15 days, its plan for correcting deficiencies or making 
improvements to its purchasing system.
    Affected Public: Business or Other For-Profit; Not-For-Profit 
Institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Peter N. Weiss.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Weiss at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: May 11, 1998.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-12966 Filed 5-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M