alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Arthur Wiscovitch, Appellant, v Lend Lease (U.S.) Construction LMB Inc., Formerly Known as Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[48 NYS3d 590]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered December 9, 2015, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as abandoned, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in dismissing the complaint as abandoned (see CPLR 3215). Plaintiff did not establish a viable excuse for the delay in moving for a default judgment against defendants, nor demonstrate a meritorious cause of action (see *Utak v Commerce Bank*Inc., 88 AD3d 522 [1st Dept 2011]). Any indeterminate extensions of time to answer the complaint ended by March 17, 2014, more than a year before the motion, after plaintiff wrote to defendants asking defendant LIC Site B2 Owner, L.L.C. to answer within two weeks, and informing defendant Lend Lease (U.S.) Construction LMB Inc. that it was in default *(see Zenzillo v Underwriters at Lloyd’s London,*78 AD3d 1540 [4th Dept 2010]). Furthermore, the excerpt of deposition testimony given by plaintiff in another action, which merely reflects that he sustained a work-related injury at a construction site, for which one of the defendants was a general contractor, does not establish a meritorious claim.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Kahn, JJ.
No. 12-8357.

#### Lopez *v.*McDonald, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
APPENDIX B: 

Yellowstone County (part) 2010 SO2 Nonattainment Area Designation 

Documentation

May 27, 2011 Letter from MT Department of Environmental Quality Director, Richard Opper, to 

EPA Regional Administrator, James B. Martin, “Montana State-Wide Sulfur Dioxide SO2 NAAQS 

Designations” and associated Technical Support Document

February 6, 2013 letter from EPA Regional Administrator James B. Martin to Governor Steve 

Bullock and associated Technical Support Document

April 3, 2013 letter from Governor Steve Bullock to Acting Regional Administrator Howard Cantor, 

“Montana Sulfur Dioxide SO2 NAAQS Designations” and associated Technical Support Document

July 25, 2013 Letter from Gina McCarthy to Governor Steve Bullock and associated Technical 

Support Document
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14252]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

May 18, 1998.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 29, 1998 
to be assured of consideration.

Financial Management Service (FMS)

    OMB Number: 1510-0029.
    Form Number: TFS 5118.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Depositor's Application for Payment of Postal Savings 
Certificate.
    Description: This form is prepared when a depositor has lost, 
destroyed, or misplaced his Postal Savings Certificates. This form, 
properly completed and signed, replaces unavailable certificates to 
support application for payment. If original certificates show up, 
document prevents duplicate.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 200.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 50 hours.

Clearance Officer: Jacqueline R. Perry (301) 344-8577, Financial 
Management Service, 3361-L 75th Avenue, Landover, MD 20785
OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-14252 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.6



SECOND AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF THE DESIGNATION, PREFERENCES RIGHTS AND
LIMITATIONS OF SERIES D 6% CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE NONVOTING PARTICIPATING
PREFERRED STOCK OF MICRO-MEDIA SOLUTIONS, INC.

     Micro-Media Solutions, Inc., hereinafter called the "Corporation", a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Utah,

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     That, pursuant to authority conferred upon the Board of Directors by the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, and pursuant to Section
16-10a-602 of the Utah Business Corporation Act, such Board of Directors by the
unanimous written consent of its members dated effective May 1, 1998 adopted a
resolution providing for a second amendment to that certain Certificate of
Designation filed by the Corporation with the Secretary of the State of Utah on
April 21, 1998, and amended by that certain Amendment to Certificate of
Designation adopted by the Corporation as of April 30, 1998 and filed with the
Secretary of the State of Utah on May 14, 1998, to increase the designation of
Series D 6% Cumulative Convertible Non-Voting Participating Preferred Stock,
$10.60 stated value per share, from 258,657 shares to 274,407 shares, which
resolution is as follows:

     RESOLVED, that pursuant to the authority conferred upon the Board of
Directors by the Certificate of Incorporation, the Series D 6% Cumulative
Convertible Non-Voting Participating Preferred Stock, $10.60 stated value per
share ("Series D Preferred Stock"), that was created on April 21, 1998 by that
certain Certificate of the Designation, Preferences, Rights, and Limitations of
Series D 6% Cumulative Convertible Non-Voting Participating Preferred Stock of
the Corporation, as amended, is hereby further amended to increase the number of
shares created from Two Hundred Fifty-Eight Thousand Six Hundred Fifty-Seven
(258,657) shares of Series D Preferred Stock to Two Hundred Seventy-Four
Thousand Four Hundred Seven (274,407) shares of Series D Preferred Stock. The
voting powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other
special rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof
shall remain the same.

1. This resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation
and it was also duly adopted by all of the holders of outstanding shares of
Series D Preferred Stock.

2. The foregoing resolution does not provide for an exchange, reclassification,
or cancellation of issued shares of the Corporation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Micro-Media Solutions, Inc. has caused this certificate
to be signed by Jose Chavez, its President, and attested by Mitchell C.
Kettrick, its Secretary, this 21st day of May, 1998.

MICRO-MEDIA SOLUTIONS, INC. 

By /s/ JOSE CHAVEZ, President

ATTEST: 

By /s/  Mitchell C. Kettrick, Secretary
#### George C. Dinstber III, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v Joseph Fludd et al., Appellants.

[768 NYS2d 633]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated January 7, 2003, which granted the motion of the plaintiff George C. Dinstber III for leave to enter a default judgment, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated April 8, 2003, as, upon granting *671their motion for reargument, adhered to the prior determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated January 7, 2003, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated April 8, 2003, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated April 8, 2003, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.

In order to successfully oppose a motion for leave to enter a default judgment based upon the failure to timely serve an answer, a defendant must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its delay and the existence of a meritorious defense *(see Gurreri v Village of Briarcliff Manor,*249 AD2d 508 [1998]). The defendants in this case failed to satisfy either requirement. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondent’s motion for leave to enter a default judgment.

We further find that, upon reargument, the defendants improperly raised a new issue (see *Foley v Roche,*68 AD2d 558, 568 [1979]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its original determination. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
# New top cop at DSCR 

/ Published June 3, 2019
Richmond, Va, 
Julio Clavell said ever since he was a child growing up in Brooklyn, New York, he’s wanted to go into the law enforcement profession.“One day a NYPD police officer took a couple of minutes to stop and see how I was doing and what I was up to. It was really a profound experience, by him taking the time out of his day to show me he cared, it inspired me to do the same for others,” he said. 

Clavell said his dream became a reality in 2003 when he landed his first law enforcement job, working as a corrections officer within the Virginia prison system. Six years later, Clavell began working as an officer for the Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond police department on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. 

After numerous promotions, including stints as the chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear (CBRNE) program manager and acting chief of police, Clavell was promoted to the DLA Installation Management Richmond chief of police on April 14. 

In his new role, Clavell said his goals for the department are to strive to provide excellent public service, remain engaged with the surrounding community and be the best DLA has to offer. He stated providing great customer service and training to the DLA workforce are top priorities as well. 

“I want to drive progress and usher periods of change by inspiring employees, [and by] earning trust for new ideas,” he said. 

Clavell said he’s more of a democratic type of leader who actively asks for input from his team and considers that feedback before making any decisions.  

“I like to foster high levels of employee engagement and workplace satisfaction. I expect managers and employees to hold themselves accountable whether it’s good or bad,” he said. 

And while he has reached an important milestone in his career, Clavell said it was that chance encounter with that NYPD police officer years ago that still motivates him. 

“I’m proud that I have the opportunity do the same for everyone I see and talk to daily. It is my desire to serve and protect our community,” he said.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SECOND
QUARTER REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000065873
<NAME>                        ALLTEL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>1000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            16,641
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    836,038
<ALLOWANCES>                                      28,944
<INVENTORY>                                      104,041
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,033,510
<PP&E>                                         8,882,866
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,820,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,952,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,003,083
<BONDS>                                        3,677,547
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              4,455
<PREFERRED>                                        9,105
<COMMON>                                         281,750
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,388,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,952,879
<SALES>                                          276,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,837,950
<CGS>                                            263,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,119,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               130,877
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  609,696
<INCOME-TAX>                                     252,866
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              356,830
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     356,371
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.25


</TABLE>
No. 12-7168.

#### Godat *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>  	<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 	9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  	SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END> 	JUNE-30-1997
<CASH>	42,414
<SECURITIES>	176,578
<RECEIVABLES>  	792,160
<ALLOWANCES>	9,501
<INVENTORY>	0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 	0
<PP&E>  	19,102
<DEPRECIATION>	10,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 	1,199,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>  	0
<BONDS>  	273,626
<COMMON> 	293
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>  	0
<PREFERRED> 	21,236
<OTHER-SE>	29,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  	1,199,900
<SALES> 	0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	111,003
<CGS>	0
<TOTAL-COSTS>	84,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 	0
<LOSS-PROVISION>  	3,398
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 	14,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>	8,959
<INCOME-TAX>	3,062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>  	5,897
<DISCONTINUED>	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>  	0
<CHANGES>  	0
<NET-INCOME>	5,821
<EPS-PRIMARY> 	20,951.00
<EPS-DILUTED> 	20,951.00
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2055 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2055

 To amend the Guaranteed Rural Housing Loan Program provisions of the 
                          Housing Act of 1949.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 26 (legislative day, April 11), 1994

  Mr. Wofford introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Guaranteed Rural Housing Loan Program provisions of the 
                          Housing Act of 1949.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guaranteed Rural Housing Fairness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF POOLING REQUIREMENTS FOR GUARANTEED RURAL 
              HOUSING LOAN PROGRAM.

    Section 502(h)(11) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 
1472(h)(11)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(11) Allocation.--The Secretary'' and 
        inserting the following:
            ``(11) Allocation.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) Pooling and reallocation.--The Secretary may 
                not pool or reallocate funds that were allocated for 
                use in any State under this subsection prior to the 
                expiration of the fiscal year next following the fiscal 
                year in which the funds were allocated.''.

                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                               
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to France (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                               
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to France (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 24.48  | 17.34  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Exhibit32.02**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jeffrey R. Miceli,Chief Financial Officer of R. J. O’Brien Fund Management, Inc.. (“RJOFM”),Managing Owner of JWH Global Trust (the “Trust”), certify that (i) the attached10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information containedin the attached Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| By:                                               | /s/ Jeffrey R. Miceli |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Jeffrey R. Miceli                                 |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| R.J. O’Brien Fund Management, Inc.           |
| March 27, 2007                                    |

 

----
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-13-000041721-MAY-201304:15 PM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.,
in my capacity as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.          the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the
Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by
the Report.

| |                                                        |  |                    
| | ------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------
| | /s/ Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                               |  | Dated: May 15, 2006
| |                                                        |  |                    
| | Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                                   |  |                    
| | Executive Vice President
  and Chief Financial Officer |  |                    
| | (principal financial and
accounting officer)           |  |                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp.
and will be retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

18

---
**Exhibit32(b)**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of ALLTELCorporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I, Jeffery R. Gardner, Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/Jeffery R. Gardner                                |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                 |
| Jeffery R. Gardner                                   |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| May 7, 2004                                          |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to ALLTEL Corporation and will be retainedby ALLTEL Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----