alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Land and Maritime Deputy Commander addresses leadership development skills

/ Published March 23, 2020
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
More than 50 leadership minded Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime associates gathered in the Building 20 Buckeye/Cardinal rooms March 11 to hear Land and Maritime Deputy Commander Kenneth Watson share some of his insights and key principles in becoming a successful leader.

The event was sponsored by Land and Maritime’s Leader Development Council and is a continuation of their efforts to promote leadership development among aspiring associates.

Throughout his presentation, Watson shared some personal experiences and lessons learned earlier in his civil service career. He addressed the importance of knowledge building and emphasized the significance of change management. Watson said the world has changed and will continue to change, there’s no going back, but effective leaders embrace the future.

Kim Donhauser, management analyst for Land and Maritime’s Procurement Process Support Directorate, attended the breakfast and said it gave her some new options to ponder as she progresses in her career. “Mr. Watson’s presentation reinforced for me that hard work and sacrifice are key to having a varied and successful career,” she said.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Alicea, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 876]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Morris, J., at plea; E. Hart, J., at sentence), rendered May 10, 2016, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Rivera, J.P., Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 15.3




Annex A – integrant part of the letter of consent issued by SC Colliers International SRL on November 26, 2013, Bucharest, Romania




CONSENT




We hereby consent to the reference to our valuation of the Radisson Blu Hotel and Centre Ville Apart Hotel in Bucharest, Romania, as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Elbit Imaging Ltd. and to the incorporation by reference of this Annual Report in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-172122) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509, No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd.




This consent is not to be construed as an admission that we are an expert or that we are a person whose consent is required to be filed under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





/s/ Colliers International


Colliers International





Bucharest, Romania


November 26, 2013
**Exhibit32(a)**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of ALLTELCorporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I, Scott T. Ford, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Scott T. Ford                     |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Scott T. Ford                         |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| May 7, 2004                           |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to ALLTEL Corporation and will be retainedby ALLTEL Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT LUIS M OR

ANT C ORDER O , Petitioner - Appe lla nt, v. M IC HAEL L. B ENOV, R

e sponde nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-16442

D.C . No. 1:11-c v-00243-LJO M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Lawre nc e J. O’ Ne ill, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2014 ** B e fore : C LIFTON, B EA, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Fe de ra l prisone r Luis M orant C orde ro a ppe a l s pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt de ny i ng his 28 U.S.C . § 2241 ha be a s pe tition. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo a distric t c o urt’ s de nia l of a se c tion 2241 ha

be a s pe tition, se eRe

y nolds v . Thomas , 603 F.3d 1144, 1148 (9th C ir. 2010), abrogated on othe r grounds by Se tse r v . Unite d State

s , 132 S. C t. 1463 

# FIL ED MAY22 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).(2012), a

nd we a ffirm . C orde ro argue s tha

t he is e ntitle d to c re dit towa rd his fe de ra l se nte nc e for the tim e spe nt in c u s tody

be twe e n April 30, 2004 a nd July 29, 2005. W e disa gre e . The sta te re ta ine d prim ary jurisdic tion ove r C orde ro from the tim e he wa s a

rre ste d in April 2004 until he

wa s pa role d in M ay

2006, inc luding thetim e he spe nt in fe de ra l c u stody

pursua nt to a writ of ha

b e a s c orpus a d

prose q ue ndum , se eTay lor v
. Re no , 164 F.3d 440, 445 (9th C ir. 1998), a nd his fe de ra l se nte nc e did not c om m e n c e until M ay

22, 2006, when he wa s re c e ive d in fe de ra l c u stody . Se e 18 U.S.C . § 3585(a); Tay lor , 164 F.3d a t 445. Heis not entitle d to fe de ra l c re dit for the p e riod prior to July

29, 2005, be c a

use the re c ord re fle c t s tha t the sta te c re dite d this time towa

rd his sta te se nte n c e . Se e 18 U.S.C . § 3585(b); Alle n v . C rabtre e , 153 F.3d 1030, 1033 (9th C ir. 1998) (se c tion 3585(b) disa llows double c re diting for tim e se rve d). C orde ro a lso c onte nds tha t the B ure a

u of Prisons (“ B OP” ) a

b use d its disc re tion by

de ny ing his re que st for nunc pro tunc de signa tion of the sta

te fa c ility whe re he se rve d his sta

te se nte nc e . The re c ord re fle c ts tha t the B OP c onside re d the sta tutory fa c tors a n d did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing C orde ro’ s re que st. Se e 18 U.S.C . § 3621(b); Re

y nolds , 603 F.3d a

t 1151-52. Se tse r v . Unite d State s , 132 S. C t. 1463 (2012), doe s not re quire a diffe re nt re sult. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 6 4 4 2 2
Exhibit 32.1
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lottery & Wagering Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dallas R. Dempster, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                       S/ Dallas R. Dempster
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       October 14, 2003
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 8, 2011



### Before

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK

, Chief Judge

W ILLIAM J. B AUER

, Circuit Judge

A NN C LAIRE W ILLIAMS

, Circuit Judge



### No

. 10

- 3728

M AURICE C OBIGE

, personally and as special representative of the estate of Patricia Cobige

, Plaintiff

- Appellee

,

v.

C ITY OF C HICAGO

, I LLINOIS

, et al

. , Defendants

- Appellants

. Appeal from the United

States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois

, Eastern Division.

No. 06 C 3807 Amy J. St. Eve

, Judge

.

Order

Plaintiff

- appellee filed a petition for rehearing on July 26, 2011

, and

defendants

- appellants file d a petition for rehearing on August 9, 2011 . All of the judges on the panel have voted to deny rehearing. The petition s for rehearing are

therefore DENIED.

The opinion of this court issued on July 12, 2011, is amended as follows:

Page 2 line 22 is amended by adding “with respect to compensatory damages” after the word “officers”.No. 10

- 3728 Page 2

Page 3 lines 4 to 6 are amended by deleting the sentence that begins

“The state

- law claim...”.

Page 9 is amended by replacing the final two paragraphs with this language:

The district court should take care to avoid recurrence of a problem that cropped up in the first trial. The jury’s verdict is ambiguous. It awarded $3 million in compensatory damages on one count of the complaint and $2 million on another. It is possible that the jury meant these to be added, as the judge did, for a total of $5 million, but it is also possible that the jury meant them to be alternative awards, with only the greater to be enforced. The verdict form used in this case was not as opaque as the one in Thomas v. Cook County Sheriff’s Department , 604 F.3d

293, 310

– 14 (7th Cir. 2010), but it was far from ideal and should be improved for the next trial. Thomas offers some help for that endeavor. It would be inappropriate to vacate just the wrongful

- death award, while leaving the awards on other theories untouched. The jury may have seen a relation among the amounts it awarded for compensatory damages under different theories of liability and adjusted one in light of the others. If any of them must be retried, all must be retried.

The judgment is affirmed to the extent it establishes the police officers’ liability and the amount of punitive damages but is vacated to the extent that it assesses the amount of compensatory damages. The case

is re manded for a new trial limited to compensatory damages.
# Troop Support volunteers visit patients at local veteran medical center

/ Published Feb. 14, 2019
PHILADELPHIA, 
Listening to war stories, cracking friendly jokes and reminiscing about times in the military was part of the scene at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Philadelphia.

Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support military personnel volunteered at the medical center to thank veteran patients for their service and help raise their spirits in support of National Salute to Veteran Patients Week Feb. 11.

“Supporting our veterans during ‘National Salute to Veteran Patients Week’ and specifically by visiting our local VA facility in Philadelphia was a wonderful opportunity to extend our gratitude for service to our country,” Navy Capt. Gerald Raia, Construction and Equipment director, said. “We could physically see their excitement as we walked around. Each time I spoke with a veteran, I could feel their own gratitude for us spending time with them...that in itself is very gratifying.”

Each year during the week of Feb. 14, the VA invites the community to recognize the more than 9 million U.S. military veterans who are cared for every day in the VA medical system. National Salute to Veteran Patients Week also raises awareness about each medical center’s role and its volunteer opportunities, according to the VA website.

The volunteers met some of the medical center’s leadership to learn about their services and capabilities before walking the halls of the medical center and passing out Valentine’s Day and thank you cards to the patients.

“The visitation to the CMCVAMC was beneficial for some of the veterans, as well as myself,” Army Sgt. First Class Jerod Cotton, a Clothing and Textile customer account specialist, said. “Many of the veterans encouraged me to retire from the service, because some of the veterans that did not complete their 20 years regret not doing so. Before arriving to the CMCVAMC, I was uniformed about how much the VA center has to offer veterans.” 

Some of the volunteers even witnessed how their presence reignited a friendly rivalry between the services. 

“Upon meeting the veterans, it was amazing to see how quickly we were able to transcend decades of time and life experiences and start speaking as old friends due to our shared military service,” Air Force Capt. Roy Cruz, Industrial Hardware Operations Cell director, said. “One of my Navy colleagues and I had the opportunity to meet and speak with a Marine veteran, and within 30 seconds they were going back and forth about Navy and Marine Corps rivalries and [they] were both serving up the typical clichés about how easy the Air Force has it. It was great!”

Some of the volunteers believed the visit had a mutual impact.
 “It was heart-warming talking to the VA staff that spends time every day working with the vets and helping them enjoy everyday life,” Raia said. “Listening to the patients’ stories not only give us an appreciation for what they experienced, but gives veterans another venue to meet with a younger generation of active duty [service members] and hear our experiences.”
#### People v Dilillo

2d Dept: 143 AD3d 960

denied*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamel Fluker, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 345]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered May 15, 2002, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19-20 [1995]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245, 250 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of assault in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt *(see*Penal Law 120.05 [2]). The defendant participated in an attack with several accomplices. He restrained the victim while his accomplices, armed with blades, slashed her head, inflicting a 13-inch scalp laceration requiring 25 staples, and cut her face and lip, which required sutures. The defendant also cut the victim above the right buttock with a sharp object. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Altman, Smith and Crane, JJ., concur.
# DLA Rapid Deployment Team supports ARNORTH units mobilizing to combat COVID-19

/ Published April 3, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
A Defense Logistics Agency Rapid Deployment Team is supporting U.S. Army North in its role as the Joint Forces Land Component Commander as it determines requirements for medical and logistics support units mobilizing to assist in the Defense Department’s response to the nationwide spread of COVID-19.As ARNORTH’s 377th Sustainment Command determines the needs of three expeditionary sustainment commands preparing to establish field locations in hot spots throughout the country, the 13-member team is relaying those demands to DLA’s COVID-19 Task Force for coordination across the agency’s supply chains.Personal protective equipment tops ARNORTH’s list of needs, but requests for information have also included the location and quantities of other items like fuel and meals, said Navy Capt. Timothy Bellott, RDT Blue commander. Units continue to use standard systems such as the online FedMall to place orders.“But we’re making sure prioritization is given for limited DOD supplies and units’ needs are getting the right level of attention,” he said.RDTs are designed to deploy on short notice to assist military and federal agencies during emergencies and contingencies. Members, who are from various supply chains and have a range of specialties from contracting to information technology, normally relocate with the task force in charge to support a geographically confined incident such as a hurricane or earthquake. But due to the rapid spread of the coronavirus and danger of being infected while traveling, individuals are working from their home locations in Virginia, California, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Alabama.“Listening to the ongoing discussions and seeing the growth in the JFLCC’s plans as they mobilize units has given us the unique opportunity to provide information from a DLA standpoint and capture some of the requirements early on,” Bellott said.One of only two team members authorized to travel so far; he is driving to Texas this weekend where he will embed with ARNORTH at Fort Sam Houston.ARNORTH requested the RDT’s assistance through the end of May.
# DLA Distribution Sigonella, Italy, Military Personnel Conduct COMREL Event at Historical Church in Presa

/ Published July 26, 2019
PRESA, Italy, 
DLA Distribution Sigonella, Italy, military personnel conducted a community relations event at the Chiesa Maria Ss. delle Grazie Church. Built in 1846 and enlarged in 1873, the Chiesa Maria is a historical church located in a small village called Presa in Piedimonte Etneo—a town nestled below Mt. Etna between the mountains and the sea.

DDSI personnel teamed up with The Green Jacket Club to clean and organize the church in preparation of the Church’s annual Patron Saint Festival. The local festival is held every August to show respect to the Saint that protects the city. According to DLA Distribution Sigonella, Italy Navy Cdr. Vincent V. Erno, “DLA Distribution Sigonella, Italy, has the pleasure of being located in the heart of the Mediterranean Sea on the historically-rich island of Sicily. It is only fitting that we give back to this beautiful area by helping to maintain the historical community buildings.”

Community relations events inform the public about the local military, and help maintain a viable and visible relationship with the communities throughout the area. Its goal is to promote volunteerism and community service between military personnel and local communities.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.26

                                FOURTH AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

      The Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby
amended, effective October 10, 2000, in the following respects:

            Section 7.06 is amended to read as follows:

            7.06  Form of Payment. All vested benefits under the Plan shall be
                  ---------------
                  paid in cash or NNS common stock. Payment in NNS common stock
                  shall be made only if the Participant has previously deferred
                  the cash equivalent value of earned performance shares under
                  Section 5.07. The number of shares of common stock so issued
                  shall not exceed the equivalent number of shares initially
                  deferred. Payments shall be made as soon as practicable after
                  the end of the deferral period or, if earlier, the date
                  specified in Section 7.02, 7.03, 7.04 or 7.05, as applicable.
                  To the extent required by law, all payments shall be subject
                  to withholding of Federal, state and local taxes.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is hereby executed this _____ day of
October 2000.

                                    NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.


                                    By: _______________________________
                                          Vice President


ATTEST:______________________
#### BGC Notes, LLC v Gordon

1st Dept: 142 AD3d 435

denied
2017-1398.

#### State ex rel. Cordell v. Paden.

In Mandamus.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14130]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 11, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, Canada; to acquire New Security 
First Network Bank, Miami, Florida, and Atlanta, Georgia, through its 
subsidiaries, RBC Holdings (USA) Inc., and RBC Holdings (Delaware) 
Inc., and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant 
to Sec.  225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 22, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-14130 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F