alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2025

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel INTREPID.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 19 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

INTREPID.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 for the vessel INTREPID, United States official number

9 508185.

Æ
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Price of Buffalo, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports from Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Price of Buffalo, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports from Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan  | Feb  | Mar | Apr  | May  | Jun  | Jul  | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ---- | --- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----
|2023                                                                                                                              |      |      |     |      |      | 1.97 | 1.81 |     |     |     |     | 2.05
|2024                                                                                                                              | 2.65 | 2.68 |     | 2.21 | 1.40 |      |      |     |     |     |     |     
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2017-0140.

#### Fed. Natl. Mtge. Assn. v. Jervis.

Licking App. No. 16-CA-73. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal. The records of this court indicate that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due February 10, 2017, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.
2017-0113.

#### State v. Conley.

Marion App. No. 9-16-10, 2016-Ohio-8408.
# Troop Support, federal partners prepare for hurricane season

/ Published June 5, 2019
PHILADELPHIA, 
The organization that provides food, water, medicine and other supplies when a natural disaster strikes continued finding ways to improve its readiness during a simulated exercise May 28-29 in Philadelphia.

During the tabletop exercise, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support tested its ability to support multiple natural disaster relief efforts, coordinate with government partners and industry to meet requirements and, new this year, execute evacuation contingency plans.

“This is a collective training event so that we can validate our ability to respond to disasters in the U.S. at the advent of hurricane season,” Army Brig. Gen. Mark Simerly, DLA Troop Support Commander, said to the exercise participants. “The National Weather Service expects two to four major hurricanes this season, so we’re expecting a more active season than we did last year.”

In the exercise scenario, DLA Troop Support was providing support to active wildfires in the Southwest when a hurricane made landfall on the mid-Atlantic coast and required an evacuation of their Philadelphia headquarters to a contingency location.

Dorothy O’Connell, a DLA Troop Support J3/5 customer support liaison, said the exercise was unique because it was the first time it demonstrated DLA Troop Support’s command and control during the evacuation, while also continuing dual relief efforts to the different partners with separate requirements.

“This year we are positioned to really test ourselves,” O’Connell said. “This is the first time we exercised two different scenarios that Troop Support would regularly provide support to and incorporated the Continuity of Operations Planning aspect.”

The participants included representatives and liaison officers from:
      - DLA headquarters and major subordinate commands
      - Army Logistics
      - Federal Emergency Management Agency
      - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
      - U.S. Northern Command and U.S. Southern Command

Their presence provided realistic expectations of requirements, identified gaps in resources and clarified roles and responsibilities, which helped make the exercise effective, according to O’Connell.

“The fact that we’re all in one room, the cross talk is valuable and saves a lot of time,” she said. “Just sharing information and sharing items across from each other saves hours.”

In recent years, Troop Support had a large role in supporting humanitarian assistance and disaster relief efforts, such as assisting the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Hurricane Florence mission and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildland Fire Protection Program.

Although it was just an exercise, the realistic scenarios helped strengthen the partnerships between the agencies in responding to natural disasters. 

“We want to make sure you all are familiar with your role, more familiar with the things you don’t know and more familiar with yourself,” Simerly said. “So when that first storm strikes, we’re postured to step in and respond for our nation.”
#### In the Matter of Darryl Moore, Petitioner, v Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[52 NYS3d 239]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Garry, Egan Jr. and Rose, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Glenn M. Dobbs  Glenn M. Dobbs Chief Executive Officer Date:  November 10, 2006    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.                      1
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 29963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14584]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[FRL-6105-3]


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for 
Source Categories: National Emission Standards for Primary Copper 
Smelters: Proposed Rule--Extension of Public Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is extending the public comment period on the Notice 
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for hazardous air pollutants emissions 
from primary copper smelters, which was published in the Federal 
Register on April 20, 1998 (63 FR 19582). The purpose of this document 
is to extend the end of the comment period from June 19, 1998 to July 
20, 1998, in order to provide commenters adequate time to review the 
NPRM and extensive supporting materials.

DATES: The EPA will accept comments on the NPRM until July 20, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted (in duplicate) to: Air and 
Radiation Docket and Information Center (6102), Attention: Docket No. 
A-96-22, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW, 
Washington, DC 20460. The EPA requests that a separate copy also be 
sent to the contact person listed below (Mr. Eugene Crumpler). The 
docket may be inspected at the above address between 8:00 a.m. and 5:30 
p.m. on weekdays. A reasonable fee may be charged for copying.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning the NPRM, 
contact Mr. Eugene Crumpler, Metals Group, Emission Standards Division 
(MD-13), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, 
NC 27711, telephone number (919) 541-0881; electronic mail address 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ccafbeb9a1bca0a9bee2aba9a2a98ca9bcade2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="127160677f627e77603c75777c77527762733c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 28, 1998.
Richard D. Wilson,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-14584 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CONSENT OF AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 dated September 12, 2000 ("Biacore Stock Option Plan
2000"), Form S-8 dated June 28, 2001 ("Biacore Stock Option Plan 2001") and
Form S-8 dated September 6, 2002 ("Biacore Stock Option Plan 2002") of Biacore
International AB (publ) of our report dated March 26, 2003 relating to the
financial statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

Stockholm, Sweden
June 16, 2003

Sten Hakansson
Authorized Public Accountant
PricewaterhouseCoopers AB
# L_2011168EN.01000701.xml

| 28.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 168/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 168/7

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 10 June 2011

appointing a member of the Court of Auditors

(2011/373/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal by the Swedish Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | Mr Lars HEIKENSTEN, member of the Court of Auditors, has resigned with effect from 15 May 2011. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Mr Lars HEIKENSTEN, member of the Court of Auditors, has resigned with effect from 15 May 2011.

| (2) | Mr Lars HEIKENSTEN should therefore be replaced for the remainder of his term of office, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Mr Lars HEIKENSTEN should therefore be replaced for the remainder of his term of office,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr H. G. WESSBERG is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the remainder of the term of office of Mr Lars HEIKENSTEN, which runs until 29 February 2012.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 10 June 2011.

For the Council

The President

FELLEGI T.

---

(1)  Opinion of 7 June 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

---
No. 12-8282.

#### Nivens *v.*Maryland.

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Cer-tiorari denied.
161 A.3d 763

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-MOVANT, v. AHARON ATWOOD AND SHALOM MIZRAHI, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

March 9, 2017

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the appellant may serve and file a supplemental brief on or before May 8, 2017, and respondents may serve and file a supplemental brief forty-five (45) days after the filing of appellant’s supplemental submission, or, if appellant declines to file such a submission, on or before June 22, 2017.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 30162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14624]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

36 CFR Part 13


Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska; Commercial Fishing Regulations 
and Environmental Assessment

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule and environmental assessment, extension of public 
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces that the public 
comment period for the proposed rule concerning commercial fishing at 
Glacier Bay National Park and the associated environmental assessment 
(EA) is being extended 169 days to November 15, 1998. The proposed rule 
was published on April 16, 1997 (62 FR 18547). This is the third 
extension of the public comment period on the proposed rule.
    The proposed rule, intended to provide a framework for enhanced 
review and comment by all interested parties, would implement fair 
measures to ensure protection of the values and purposes of Glacier Bay 
NP, including the preservation, enjoyment, and scientific value of the 
park's unique marine ecosystem. In general, the proposed rule would 
prohibit all commercial fishing in Glacier Bay proper but provide 
certain limited exemptions over a 15 year phase-out period, and 
authorize established commercial fishing in the park's marine waters 
outside Glacier Bay proper subject to reexamination at the end of 15 
years.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule and EA will be accepted through 
November 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed rule and EA should be submitted to: 
Superintendent, Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, P.O. Box 140, 
Gustavus, Alaska 99826.
    Copies of the environmental assessment and an executive summary are 
available by writing Glen Yankus, National Park Service, Alaska Support 
Office, 2525 Gambell St., Anchorage, AK 99503-2838. A copy of the 
Executive Summary for the EA will be available on the park's web site 
at
http://www.nps.gov/glba in the management issues section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Glen Yankus, National Park Service, 
Alaska Support Office, (907) 257-2645.

    Dated: May 28, 1998.
Chris Andress,
Chief, Ranger Activities Division.
[FR Doc. 98-14624 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
#### Com. v. Frey12

04/18/2016

028 MAL (2016)

12

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27
The following scheduled contains summarized financial information extracted
from the Questar Gas Company Statements of Income and Balance Sheet for the
period ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,368
<PP&E>                                       1,054,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                 445,829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 686,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,579
<BONDS>                                        225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,974
<OTHER-SE>                                     232,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   686,317
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               328,246
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  264,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,218
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,722
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,496
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,496
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
2017-0583.

#### State v. Herring.

Cuyahoga App. No. 104441, 2017-Ohio-743. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

O’Neill and DeWine, JJ., dissent.
#### In the Matter of Marat Fronshtein, Appellant, v Rick D. Chandler et al., Respondents.

[55 NYS3d 196]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Kathryn E. Freed, J.), entered on or about August 5, 2016, which denied the petition seeking to invalidate respondents’ August 11, 2015, denial of petitioner’s application for a master electrician’s license and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*553Contrary to petitioner’s argument, this article 78 proceeding did not involve a question of substantial evidence. The investigatory hearings before the Master Electrician Licensing Board are not “hearings pursuant to law” within the meaning of CPLR 7804 (g) (see *Matter of Solomon v Department of Bldgs. of City of N.Y.,*46 AD3d 370, 371 [1st Dept 2007], *lv denied*10 NY3d 712 [2008]; *Nassau Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v Facilities Dev. Corp.,*131 AD2d 171, 174 [3d Dept 1987]).

Respondents’ denial of petitioner’s application, on the ground that he lacked good moral character, was not arbitrary and capricious, had a rational basis, and was not an abuse of discretion (see *Matter of Peckham v Calogero,*12 NY3d 424, 431 [2009]). Based on his testimony that he performed “low voltage work” while he was self-employed, respondents rationally concluded that petitioner engaged in unlicensed electrical work, in violation of the New York City Electrical Code (Administrative Code of City of NY § 27-3004). Although the statute recognizes an exception for “low voltage work” performed under a certification issued to a “low voltage installer” (Administrative Code § 27-3017 [a] [2]), petitioner did not possess a low voltage certification. Respondents’ finding that petitioner performed unlicensed electrical work constitutes a rational basis for its determination that petitioner therefore lacked good moral character *(see Matter of Cambridge v Commissioner of N.Y. City Dept. of Bldgs.,*14 AD3d 373, 375-377 [1st Dept 2005]).

Petitioner’s reliance on Administrative Code § 27-3018 (b) is misplaced. The fact that certain low voltage work does not require a permit to be filed with the Department of Buildings does not mean that unlicensed individuals may perform low voltage work.

Petitioner’s due process arguments are unavailing. Petitioner did not have a due process right to a hearing regarding his initial application for a license *(see Matter of Rasole v Department of Citywide Admin. Servs.,*83 AD3d 509 [1st Dept 2011]). Because the July 16, 2015 meeting was not a hearing, respondents were not required to notify petitioner and afford him an opportunity to be heard.

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
No. 12-8284.

#### Alexander *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7610.

#### Davis *v.*Clark et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis [ante,*p. 1141] denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.