alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30496-30497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14838]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the Secretary, Assistant Secretary for Planning and 
Evaluation, Notice Inviting Applications for the New Award for Fiscal 
Year 1998, Correction

AGENCY: The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and 
Evaluation (ASPE), Office of the Secretary (OS).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register of May 21, 1998, The Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) published a 
Notice Inviting Applications for Grants to determine the status of 
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients after they 
leave the TANF caseload, eligible families who are diverted before 
being enrolled, or eligible families who fail to enroll. The document 
contained an ambiguous description of Eligible Applicants.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Snow, 202-690-6888.

[[Page 30497]]

Correction

    In the Federal Register issue of May 21, 1998, in FR Doc. 98-13473, 
on page 27975, in the first column, correct the first sentence of the 
``Eligible Applicants'' section to read:
    Given the nature of the research involved, competition is open only 
to State agencies that administer TANF programs and to counties with 
populations greater than 500,000 that administer TANF programs.

    Dated: May 28, 1998.
Margaret A. Hamburg,
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 98-14838 Filed 6-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4151-04-P
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
The schedule contains summarized financial information extracted from the
Questar Gas Company Statements of Income and Balance Sheet for the period
ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such unaudited financial statements.
[/LEGEND]
[MULTIPLIER] 1,000
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-2000
[CASH]                                               0
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                   94,086
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                     10,689
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               107,308
[PP&E]                                       1,023,075
[DEPRECIATION]                                 430,474
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 719,235
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          136,164
[BONDS]                                        225,000
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                        22,974
[OTHER-SE]                                     255,259
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   719,235
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               200,520
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                  148,601
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                13,170
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               5,177
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 34,001
[INCOME-TAX]                                    13,286
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                             20,715
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    20,715
[EPS-BASIC]                                          0
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
No. 12-8073.

#### Baptiste *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-6912.

#### Bruederle *v.*Metropolitan Government of Louisville and Jefferson County, Kentucky, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oluwatosin Olatujoye, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 117]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obús, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered May 13, 2014, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1928

To require the availability of adequate waste emplacement capacity for the

future licensing of construction and operation of nuclear utilization facilities, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. WELLSTONE (for himself, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr.

METZENBAUM) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To require the availability of adequate waste emplacement

capacity for the future licensing of construction and operation of nuclear utilization facilities, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Second Generation Nu5 clear Waste Act’’.
2

•S 1928 IS

1 SEC. 2. PERMIT AND LICENSING REQUIREMENTS.

2 Section 185 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42

3 U.S.C. 2235) is amended by adding at the end the follow4 ing new subsection:

5 ‘‘(c)(1) Notwithstanding any other law, no construc6 tion permit or combined construction and operating li7 cense shall be issued for a utilization facility used for the

8 generation of electricity for commercial sale until such

9 time as—

10 ‘‘(A) there is a facility licensed by the Federal

11 Government for the permanent emplacement of

12 spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste

13 from the utilization facility; and

14 ‘‘(B) there is an adequate volume of capacity

15 within the emplacement facility to accept all of the

16 spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste

17 that will be generated by the utilization facility dur18 ing the reasonably foreseeable operational lifetime of

19 the utilization facility.

20 ‘‘(2) At no time shall the total volume of spent fuel

21 and high-level radioactive waste generated, or reasonably

22 expected to be generated, by all utilization facilities used

23 for the generation of electricity for commercial sale receiv24 ing construction permits or combined licenses after the

25 date of enactment of this subsection, exceed the total vol26 ume of capacity available in facilities licensed by the Fed-
3

•S 1928 IS

1 eral Government for the permanent emplacement of spent

2 nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste.’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Henry Abraham, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 228]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), rendered May 15, 2014, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his challenge to the hearing court’s suppression determination *(see People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; *People v Sanchez,*122 AD3d 778, 778-779 [2014]; *People v Kidd,*100 AD3d 779, 779 [2012]), and his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive *(see People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 9 [1989]).

Rivera, J.P., Hall, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.
No. 12-870.

#### Cook, Individually and as Administrator for the Estate of Cook, et al. *v.*Howard et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nelson Villanueva, Appellant.

[66 NYS3d 115]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered September 8, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Gesmer and Oing, JJ.
No. 12-1048.

#### Dellas *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Royal
Standard Minerals Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief,
the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012, which
accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Royal Standard Minerals Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The
foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The
undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing
certification except as required by law.

Dated effective: May 31, 2012

/s/ Ike
MakrimichalosIke Makrimichalos Chief Financial Officer

---
164 A.3d 402

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, COUNTY OF HUNTERDON, PLAINTIFFS, AND TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. QUAKER VALLEY FARMS, LLC AND DAVID DEN HOLLANDER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

March 16, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted.
164 A.3d 394

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. ALLEN ALEXANDER (A/K/A KARON KEENAN), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

March 16, 2017

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:

A petition for certification of the judgment in [ A-XXXXXX-XX ] having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the appellant may serve and file a supplemental brief on or before May 16, 2017, and respondent may serve and file a supplemental brief forty-five (45) days after the filing of appellant’s supplemental submission, or, if appellant declines to file such a submission, on or before June 30, 2017.
Oklahoma Regional Haze SIP submitted to EPA February 17, 2010

Available in Regulations.gov docket EPA - R06 - OAR - 2010 - 0190

 OK011.0002 Oklahoma Regional Haze SIP, submitted to EPA February 17, 2010 (OK - 34). 130 pages 2.4 MB r3b
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2373
LINDA G. MORRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA03-2856-RDB) Submitted: May 31, 2005 Decided: June 20, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Allen F. Loucks, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Linda G. Morris appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Morris v. Secretary, HHS , No. CA-03-2856- RDB (D. Md. Sept. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Com. v. Easter

03/23/2016

701 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 481
# L_2012311DE.01001801.xml

| 10.11.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 311/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 311/18

---

Berichtigung des Durchführungsbeschlusses 2011/874/EU der Kommission vom 15. Dezember 2011 zur Festlegung der Liste der Drittländer und Gebiete, aus denen die Einfuhr von Hunden, Katzen und Frettchen und die Verbringung von mehr als fünf Hunden, Katzen oder Frettchen zu anderen als Handelszwecken in die Union zulässig sind, sowie zur Festlegung der Bescheinigungsmuster für die Einfuhr dieser Tiere und für deren Verbringung zu anderen als Handelszwecken in die Union

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 343 vom 23. Dezember 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 343 vom 23. Dezember 2011

Seite 71, Anhang I Abschnitt „Bemerkungen“ Buchstabe e:

anstatt:

„Die Bescheinigung gilt zehn Tage ab dem Tag der Ausstellung durch die amtliche Tierärztin/den amtlichen Tierarzt; bei einer Verbringung von mehr als fünf Hunden, Katzen oder Frettchen zu anderen als Handelszwecken in die Union gilt die Bescheinigung insgesamt vier Monate ab dem Tag der Ausstellung oder, wenn dieser Zeitpunkt früher liegt, bis zum Ende der Gültigkeit der Tollwutimpfung.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Bescheinigung gilt zehn Tage ab dem Tag der Ausstellung durch die amtliche Tierärztin/den amtlichen Tierarzt; mit Ausnahme einer Verbringung von mehr als fünf Hunden, Katzen oder Frettchen zu anderen als Handelszwecken in die Union; in diesem Fall gilt die Bescheinigung für den Fall weiterer Verbringungen innerhalb der Union insgesamt vier Monate ab dem Tag der Ausstellung oder bis zum Ende der Gültigkeit der Tollwutimpfung, je nachdem welcher Zeitpunkt früher liegt.“

---
Exhibit 10.5(b)

       Schedule of 12% Secured Convertible Notes issued by NCT Group, Inc.
       to Carole Salkind during the three months ended March 31, 2006


                                                                    Conversion
       Issue Date           Due Date             Principal           Price (a)
       ----------           --------             ---------           ---------
        02/13/06            08/13/06            $ 652,655             $0.0100
                                              ---------------
                                                $ 652,655
                                              ===============


     (a)  Note conversion price will be the greater of: (i) the lowest last sale
          price of NCT's common stock during the two-day period comprised of the
          date of the  note and the  preceding  date;  or (ii) the par  value of
          NCT's common stock on the date the  conversion  notice is delivered to
          NCT.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-406-000]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

May 27, 1998.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on Tuesday, June 9, 1998, at 10:00 a.m., at the 
offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE, Washington, DC 20426, for the purpose of exploring the possible 
settlement of the above-referenced docket.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervener status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, please contact William J. Collins at 
(202) 208-0248.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14483 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. E UG E NI O H AR OS - GI R ON , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 50563 D. C . No . 3 : 1 1 - c r - 0 1 0 9 7 - L AB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L a rryA . B urns , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r13, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T R O T T , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E ug eni o H ar os-G i ron app ea l s f rom the 60 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f o llo w in g h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rc o n s p ir a c yto im p o rt m a r iju a n a , in vi ol a t i on of

21 U . S . C . §§ 952, 960, 963; a nd i m port a t i on of m a r i j ua naa nd a i di ng 

# FI LED NO V 19 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50563 2 a nd abe tt i ng, i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U . S . C . §§ 952, 960, a nd 18 U . S . C . § 2. W e ha ve ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f irm . H ar os-G i ron con t ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d b y denyi ng hi m re l i ef u n d e rth e s a f

e tyv a lv e p r o v is io n o f

th e G u id e lin e s . See U .S .S .G . § 5 C 1 .2 . T h is cont ent i on fa i l s. T he re cord supp ort s the di stri ctcourt ’ s det erm i nat i on that H a r os - G i r on a c t e d a s am a na ge rors upe rvi s ordur i ng the c om m i s s i on of the o f f e n s e . See U . S . S . G . § 3 B 1. 1(b); U ni te d States v . E

gge , 2 2 3 F .3 d1 1 2 8 , 1 1 3 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2000) . B e c aus e H a r os - G i r on’ s a ggr a va t i ng r ol e i n the of f e ns e pr e c l ude s the ap p lic a tio n o f

s a f e tyv a lv e r e lie f

, th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t e rr . See U. S . S . G. § 5 C 1 .2 ( a ) ( 4 ) . AF F I RME D.
2017-0443.

#### State ex rel. Peterson v. Carr.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
# DLA to raise awareness of insider threats, security through September

/ Published Sept. 2, 2020
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
During September, the Defense Logistics Agency joins other federal agencies in raising employees’ awareness of violence and cyberattacks from their co-workers as part of Insider Threat Awareness Month, which also focuses on security this year.  

DLA Chief of Staff Kristin French is encouraging senior leaders and supervisors to promote good security practices and insider threat awareness among their staffs with a focus on five weekly themes: 
      - Week one – Security awareness
      - Week two – How to report concerning behavior
      - Week three – Controlled unclassified information policy
      - Week four – Preventing inadvertent disclosures 
      - Week five – Resiliency

DLA’s Insider Threat Program is managed by DLA Intelligence and is designed to reduce risks to DLA information, people, facilities and mission. Insider threats include espionage, unauthorized disclosure, workplace violence, sabotage, fraud, security violations and actions that unintentionally increase vulnerabilities.

One way to counter insider threats is through good security practices, especially as more employees telework. Poor operations security practices recently prompted the Secretary of Defense to require new mandatory training reinforcing employees’ responsibility to protect sensitive, non-public information. 

Cases of espionage, such as the Defense Department linguist charged with transmitting classified information to a foreign national in March, receive widespread media coverage. But the unwitting compromise of information through poor security practices is also detrimental and could allow adversaries to gain advantage over national interests.  

These are some of the ways employees can protect sensitive information:
      - Encrypt email when sending sensitive information. 
      - Review information for sensitivity before posting it on social media or websites.
      - Use passwords to protect information on shared drives.
      - Apply the need-to-know principle to sensitive information.
      - Double check before clicking on links within emails. 
      - Turn off personal digital assistants like Amazon Echo, Google Home or Apple Siri that might be listening to work-related conversations.  
      - Avoid conducting sensitive phone conversations in the vicinity of family and friends.
#### Lei Ke v. Drexel University

08/24/2016

151 EAL (2016)

Denied
Exhibit
13.2



CERTIFICATION
PERSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. & 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Royal Standard Minerals Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and
belief, the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2018, which accompanies this certification, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Royal Standard Minerals Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.
The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|Dated:
    August 8, 2018   | 
|--------------------------- | 
|                            | 
|/s/
    Daniel Crandall     | 
|Daniel
    Crandall         | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer |