alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 31220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-15163]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 2, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill III, Assistant 
Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. Peoples Bancorporation, Inc., Easley, South Carolina; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Bank of Anderson, National 
Association, Anderson, South Carolina (in organization).
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. SNB Bancshares, Inc., Macon, Georgia; to merge with Crossroads 
Bancshares, Inc., Perry, Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Crossroads Bank of Georgia, Perry, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 3, 1998.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-15163 Filed 6-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### Robert Grigorian, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Karina Grigorian, et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[52 NYS3d 678]

*1086In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jimenez-Salta, J.), dated December 18, 2015, which granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Robert Grigorian (hereinafter the infant plaintiff) allegedly was injured when he slipped and fell off a snow mound. On the day of the accident, the infant plaintiff was released from school at 3:00 p.m., and went home. At 5:00 p.m. he went back to school to pick up his younger sister, who was in an after-school program. School officials released the infant plaintiff’s sister to him, and they began to walk home. As they were walking, they passed a snow mound, which was located between the infant plaintiff’s school and his sister’s school on a street that was closed to traffic and used, in part, as a parking lot for teachers. The infant plaintiff’s sister climbed up the mound, and the infant plaintiff climbed up the mound to retrieve her. As he was doing so, he slipped and fell, injuring himself.

Thereafter, the infant plaintiff, by his mother and natural guardian, the plaintiff Karina Grigorian, and his mother, individually, commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries against the City of New York, the New York City Department of Education, the Board of Education of the City of New York, and the New York City Sanitation Department. The defendants moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Supreme Court granted that branch of the defendants’ motion, and the plaintiffs appeal.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. They demonstrated, prima facie, that the infant plaintiff, as well as his sister, had passed out of the orbit of the authority of their respective schools at the time of the accident, and their schools no longer had custody and control over either of them at the time of the subject accident *(see Pratt v Robinson,*39 NY2d 554, 560 [1976]). The defendants also demonstrated, prima facie, that they maintained the area where the accident occurred in a reasonably safe condition, and that the snow mound did not constitute a dangerous condition. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The plaintiffs’ remaining contention is without merit.

*1087Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Leventhal, J.P., Hinds-Radix, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
#### C.L.A., In re Interest of

10/22/2015

366 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 1053
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATON FROM THE FORM 10-QSB FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED March 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,381
<PP&E>                                           3,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           369
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,813
<SALES>                                          2,419
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,419
<CGS>                                            1,739
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    138
<INCOME-TAX>                                        55
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 83
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        83
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Combined Arts Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Panel, Opera Section (Creation & Presentation 
Category) to the National Council on the Arts will be held on June 29-
30, 1998. The panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. on June 29 and 
from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on June 30, in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks 
Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20506. A portion of 
this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. on June 30, will be open to 
the public for a policy discussion on field needs, Leadership/
Millennium initiatives, and guidelines.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 
on June 29, and from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on June 30, are for the 
purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on 
applications for financial assistance under the National Foundation on 
the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including 
information give in confidence to the agency by grant applicants. In 
accordance with the determination of the Chairman of May 14, 1998, 
these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection 
(c)(4)(6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and, if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal 
employee in attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of Accessibility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-
TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, 
National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-
5691.

    Dated: May 28, 1998.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 98-14701 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
#### Marriage of McKittrick

DA 16-0426

06/20/17

2017 MT 151N

Affirmed

Dist. 13 (Yellowstone)
*June 21, 2017*

2017-Ohio-4418.]

*14292013-2026.

#### In re Rev. of Alternative Energy Rider Contained in Tariffs of Ohio Edison Co.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 11-5201-EL-RDR. On request for clarification and guidance regarding the court’s notice of oral argument. Request stricken as untimely. The parties shall determine how to share the time allotted to each side.
No. 09-9541.

#### In re Hubert Warren, Petitioner.

562 U.S. 822, 131 S. Ct. 380,

178 L. Ed. 2d 16,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6470.

October 4, 2010.

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.
No. 10M22.

#### Alec Redfearn, Sr., Petitioner v. City of Satellite Beach, Florida.

562 U.S. 819, 131 S. Ct. 376,

178 L. Ed. 2d 12,

2010 U.S. LEXIS 6391.

October 4, 2010.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.

Same case below, 33 So. 3d 36.
No. 12-8865.

#### Jingles v. United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Dear Brian, 

Jim Lucas <jim.lucas@marshallelectronics.net> 

Sunday, July 29, 2012 2:23 PM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

customer.relations@flygreatlakes.com 

Docket: DOT -OST -2004-19916 

: 17 ., j ·~ 

Regarding Docket: DOT -OST -2004-19916. 

D c::o J .,j 

. ~·'' ~ 0"' ... l'l'lttP 

I would like to cast my vote for keeping Great Lakes Airlines as the provider of air service for the Visalia municipal 

airport. Last year I flew Great Lakes about 50 times and would have flowh more except for business scheduling issues. I 

work in Los Angeles and live in Visalia. My office is less than two miles from LAX in the aerospace area of El Segundo. ·It 

would be of no use to me if an airline flies between Visalia to Burbank and therefore I would not utilize the service. I also 

have great misgivings about flying in a single engine aircraft. 

Thank you for you consideration. 

Jim Lucas 

Product Manager, Broadcast Multimedia Division 

Marshall Electronics Inc. 

1910 E. Maple Ave 

EISegundo,CA.90245 

(}) 800-800-6608 ext. 1221- Toll Free 

(}) 001-310-333-0606 ext. 1221-lnternationa/ 

~ 310.333.0688 FAX 

(}) 424-225-0878 Cell 

(1) http://www.marshall-usa.com 

&J Jim.Lucas@Marshallelectronics.net 

1
#### In the Matter of Luisa Fuel, Respondent, v Carlos Chaca, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 886]

Appeals from (1) an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kangs County (Dean T. Kusakabe, J.), dated March 29, 2016, and (2) an order of protection of that court also dated March 29, 2016. The order of fact-finding and disposition, after a hearing, granted the family offense petition against the appellant. The order of protection directed the appellant to refrain from certain conduct with respect to the petitioner until and including March 28, 2018.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition and the order of protection are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*1232The petitioner commenced this family offense proceeding seeking an order of protection against the appellant, who is her former spouse. Following a fact-finding hearing, the Family Court determined that the appellant had committed the family offenses of attempted assault in the third degree, harassment in the second degree, and menacing in the third degree. After a dispositional hearing, the court issued a final order of protection directing the appellant to refrain from certain conduct with respect to the petitioner until and including March 28, 2018.

“ Tn a family offense proceeding, the petitioner has the burden of establishing, by a fair preponderance of the evidence, that the charged conduct was committed as alleged in the petition’ ” *(Matter of Bah v Bah,*112 AD3d 921, 921-922 [2013], quoting *Matter of Cassie v Cassie,*109 AD3d 337, 340 [2013], quoting Family Ct Act § 832). “The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the Family Court, and its determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses are entitled to great weight on appeal” *(Matter of Nusbaum v Nusbaum,*59 AD3d 725, 725 [2009] [citations and internal quotation marks omitted]).

Here, a fair preponderance of the credible evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing supports a finding that the appellant committed the family offenses of attempted assault in the third degree, harassment in the second degree, and menacing in the third degree, warranting the issuance of an order of protection against him (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.00 [1]; 120.15, 240.26 [1]; *see Matter of Maiorino v Maiorino,*107 AD3d 717 [2013]; *Matter of Panico v Panico,*100 AD3d 907, 908 [2012]; *Matter of Akter v Patwary,*80 AD3d 759 [2011]). Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Family Court did not improperly rely upon allegations not charged in the petition (see *Matter of Charrat v Jeanty,*146 AD3d 947, 948 [2017]; *cf. Matter of Kiani v Kiani,*134 AD3d 1036, 1038 [2015]; *Matter of Bessent v Bessent,*113 AD3d 847, 848 [2014]; *Matter of Czop v Czop,*21 AD3d 958, 959 [2005]).

Mastro, J.P., Hall, Austin and Barros, JJ., concur.
#### Hernandez v. W.C.A.B. (Giorgio Foods, Inc.)60

03/08/2016

722 MAL (2015)

60

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied
October 15, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KIMBERLY WOODFORK , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00927

- CV V.

BANK OF AMERICA , Appellee

__ ______________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, BANK OF AMERICA , signed September 24, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order th e judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, KIMBERLY WOODFORK
, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit
15.15



CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No. 333-194519) and in the Registration
Statement on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-172122) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-117509,
No. 333-130852, No. 333-136684 and No. 333-152820) filed by Elbit Imaging Ltd. of our auditors report dated November 9, 2017,
relating to the financial statements of Insightec Ltd. as of December 31, 2016, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
Elbit Imaging Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2016.



|/s/
    Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.         | 
|--------------------------------------------- | 
|Brightman
    Almagor Zohar & Co.             | 
|Certified
    Public Accountants              | 
|A
    member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu | 
|                                              | 
|Tel-Aviv,
    Israel                          | 
|November
    9, 2017                          |
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Price of El Paso, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Price of El Paso, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 7.87   | 6.26   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of MOCON, Inc. on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darrell B. Lee, ChiefFinancial Officer of MOCON, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of MOCON, Inc.

 
| Date:  May 17, 2010 |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
| /s/  Darrell B. Lee      |   |
| Darrell  B. Lee          |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 
10-Q OF MOBILE AMERICA CORPORATION DATED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        35,131,321
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       48,690,505
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         48,432,008
<EQUITIES>                                   1,887,265
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              98,259,465
<CASH>                                       5,455,070
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              35,793
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      (2,331,248)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             153,387,448
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             38,871,121
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         38,390,183
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             12,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       191,110
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,864,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               153,387,448
<PREMIUMS>                                  22,552,522
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          2,961,869
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              22,509
<OTHER-INCOME>                               4,935,016
<BENEFITS>                                  16,806,019
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,172,521
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         7,204,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,289,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,636,888
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,652,381
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,652,381
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              20,040,739
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         19,933,294
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                           (3,127,283)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           7,195,299
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            12,069,651
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             17,581,800
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      3,127,283
        

</TABLE>
#### People v Kaff

2d Dept: 149 AD3d 783

denied