alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.22.1

                                  ADDENDUM 3
                                  ----------
                                      TO
                                      --
                             DISTRIBUTOR AGREEMENT
                             ---------------------
                 BETWEEN SYNPLICITY, INC. AND WYLE ELECTRONICS
                 ---------------------------------------------


     This Addendum No. 3 to the Distributor Agreement dated April 1, 1999 is
made by and between Synplicity, Inc., having its principal place of business at
935 Stewart Drive, Sunnyvale, California 94086 and Wyle Electronics, having its
principal place of business at 15370 Barranca Parkway, Irvine, California 92618.



 .  Exhibit A, Schedule 4 (b) Renewal Procedure, shall be deleted in its entirety
   and replaced with the following:

   (b)  Renewal Procedure: This Agreement shall renew automatically for
        additional 12 month terms unless either party notifies the other of its
        intent to terminate 60 days prior to the expiration of the then current
        term.

Except as amended herewith, all other paragraphs of the Synplicity, Inc.
Distributor Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. In the event of
any conflict between the Distributor Agreement and this Addendum 3, the
provisions of this Addendum 3 shall prevail.

The parties hereto have executed this Addendum with an effective date of
November 1, 2000.

SYNPLICITY, INC.                        WYLE ELECTRONICS

/s/ Douglas S. Miller                   /s/ Richard F. Timmins
-----------------------------------     -----------------------------------
Signature                               Signature

Douglas S. Miller                       Richard F. Timmins
-----------------------------------     -----------------------------------
Printed Name                            Printed Name

Vice President Finance, CFO             Sr. V.P. Engineering
-----------------------------------     -----------------------------------
Title                                   Title

      11/9/00                                  11/11/00
-----------------------------------     -----------------------------------
Date                                    Date
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the First Intermediate Account of Melissa C. England and Another, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Hazard K. Campbell, Sr., and HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as Cotrustees of the Trust by Marjorie K.C. Klopp, dated October 11, 1961, Grantor, for the Benefit of the Issue of Gracia M. Campbell, Formerly Known as Gracia C. Flickinger, for the Period October 11, 1961, to May 9, 2012. Melissa C. England and Another, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Hazard K. Campbell, Sr., et al., Respondents; Gracia E. Campbell et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 3.)

[51 NYS3d 916]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered May 5, 2015. The order, among other things, granted petitioners’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs and denied respondents’ cross motion to disgorge fees.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying that part of the motion seeking attorneys’ fees and costs, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for a determination of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in accordance with the same memorandum as in *Matter of HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (Campbell)*([appeal No. 1] 150 AD3d 1661 [2017]).

Present—Centra, J.P., Lindley, Curran and Scudder, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.B CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2005, of ANR Pipeline Company (the Company) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg G.
Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify (i)
that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Greg G. GruberGreg G. GruberSenior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)May 11, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ANR Pipeline Company and will be retained by ANR Pipeline Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Bibbus v. W.C.A.B. (Wood Co.)

10/07/2015

514 MAL (2015)

Denied
#### RJW Enterprises, Inc., a Division of Primalyn Enterprises, Inc., Respondent, v P.J. Simao et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[51 NYS3d 920]

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered February 12, 2015. The order, among other things, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties, and filed in the Monroe County Clerk’s Office on April 26, 2017,

It is hereby ordered that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Present—Centra, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Curran and Scudder, JJ.
No. 12-8803 (12A820).

#### Blue *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institu*1190tions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-8338.

#### Schmitt *v.*Morgan, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Troop Support Women’s History Month program celebrates ‘visionaries’

/ Published March 15, 2019
PHILADELPHIA, 
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employees celebrated Women’s History Month with a live musical performance and interactive presentation during an annual observance program held March 13 in Philadelphia. 

The Women’s History Month program theme was “Visionary Women: Champions of Peace and Nonviolence.”

Liz Fletcher Brown, a dancer, awarding winning author and thought leader in the field of personal transformation served as the keynote speaker, captivating the audience through her unique storytelling and words of wisdom. 

“Visionary women, they are champions of peace and nonviolence,” Brown said. “They know that they are connected to their core and the depths of their being. That’s the key to their resilience. That’s what gives them the ability to overcome obstacles, and to be able to face defeat over and over again...never giving up.”

At several different times during her 20-minute presentation, Brown posed conversation prompts to the audience. This included audience members telling the person sitting next to them about a women who’s influenced their life, and to share their personal sense of purpose as a few words on a t-shirt. 

“Mine would probably be something like, ‘live with full wattage,’” Brown said with a chuckle. “I don’t believe in holding back.”

After a very lively, at times comical, and interactive presentation, she concluded her message on a serious note, referencing this year’s theme.

“Visionary women know what really matters most to them,” Brown said. “They know what is worth taking a stand for and in some cases what is worth risking their life for.”

Keeping with DLA Troop Support tradition, the program culminated with an award ceremony.

“Long before the formal recognition was established, women have been making their mark on this country and continue to do so today,” Army Brig. Gen. Mark Simerly, DLA Troop Support commander said. “Today, we’ll honor some of our colleagues for blazing a trail for others to follow as exemplary models of public service and government leadership.”

The ‘Woman of the Year’ awardees in their respective categories were:

◾Non-supervisory GS-9 and below: Gina Breleur, Troop Support Europe and Africa 

◾Non-supervisory GS-11 and above: Jennifer Hamby, Audit Readiness

◾Supervisor/Manager of the Year: (TIE) Shevaughn Jorsling, Construction and Equipment and Army Lt. Col. Latrina Lee, J3/5
#### Matter of G.S. & A.S., YINC

DA 16-0483

04/11/17

2017 MT 85N

Affirmed

Dist. 13 (Yellowstone)
# HDI workforce celebrates Native American Heritage Month

/ Published Nov. 27, 2019
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
The Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center’s Native American Heritage Month program was canceled this year due to guest speaker illness.

Helen Goertler, from the Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Office at the federal center, was one of the planners for the program.

                Native American Heritage Month                            DOD's 2019 Native American Heritage Month poster            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: DODVIRIN: 100926-D-D0441-505She said President George H.W. Bush designated the month of November as “National American Indian Heritage Month” in 1990.

“However, Native Americans and others had been celebrating this month for many decades before its official declaration,” Goertler said. “During this time, we celebrate diverse cultures, traditions, and histories, and acknowledge the important accomplishments of Native American people."

Goertler said that this year’s program would have focused on the tradition of military service among Native Americans.

“They have the highest record of service per capita than any other ethnic group, and have a higher rate of female service members,” Goertler said. “Native Americans have fought in every war in the United States since the American Revolution. Today, there are 31,000 Native Americans serving on active duty in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere in the world.

” She added that the goal of the program is to provide a platform for native people to share their culture, traditions, music, crafts, dance, ways and concepts of life.

DLA recognizes National Native American Heritage Month each November by providing employees with Native American history, rights, culture and contemporary issues to better assist them in their jobs and for overall awareness.
No. 12-8676.

#### Charles *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of Brianna C., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Raidri C., Appellant; Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[53 NYS3d 538]

Order of fact-finding, Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about June 21, 2016, which determined, after a hearing, that respondent mother had neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Family Court’s finding that the mother neglected the child was supported by a preponderance of the evidence, as the mother misused drugs and alcohol and refused to participate in any rehabilitation program during the relevant period *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]). The mother’s admissions to hospital staff that she smoked marijuana on the weekends, would drink five to six alcohol beverages a day on a regular basis, would “black out” from drinking, would become violent and aggressive when intoxicated to the point of physically attacking other people, and attempted suicide while intoxicated, constituted prima facie evidence of neglect pursuant to Family Court Act § 1046 (a) (iii). The mother failed to rebut the statutory presumption of neglect by presenting proof that she was voluntarily and regularly participating in a recognized rehabilitation program *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [iii]; *Matter of Keoni Daquan A. [Brandon W.*—April *A.],*91 AD3d 414, 415 [1st Dept 2012]). Given the statutory presumption, the agency was not required to establish the child’s impairment or risk of impairment (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; *Keoni Daquan A.,*91 AD3d at 415).

Even in the absence of the application of the presumption, the evidence established that the child was at imminent risk of harm as a result of the mother’s untreated mental illness (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; *Matter of Noah Jeremiah J. [Kimberly J.],*81 AD3d 37 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur—Friedman, J.R, Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
#### 123 Cutting Co., Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v Topcove Associates, Inc., et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Positive Influence Fashion, Inc., Plaintiff, and Topcove Associates, Inc., Appellant, v City of New York, Defendant, and Consolidated Edison Company et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.) (And Another Action.)

[770 NYS2d 365]

In related negligence actions to recover for damage to property, Topcove Associates, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated April 12, 2002, entered in Action No. 2 which, upon an order of the same court dated January 18, 2002, granting those branches of the separate motions of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., sued herein as Consolidated Edison Company, and Ward Mechanical Corp., inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in Action No. 2 insofar as asserted by Topcove Associates, Inc., against them, is in favor of those defendants and against it in that action.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the separate motions of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., sued herein as Consolidated Edison Company and Ward Mechanical Corp., defendants in Action No. 2, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in that action insofar as asserted by the appellant Topcove Associates, Inc., against them based on lack of capacity to sue. When the appellant filed for bankruptcy pursuant to chapter 11 of the 1978 *607United States Bankruptcy Code (11 USC) in or about September 2000, more than five years after it commenced Action No. 2, it failed to list that action as an asset in its bankruptcy petition. “[I]t is well settled that a debtor’s failure to list a legal claim as an asset in his or her bankruptcy proceeding causes the claim to remain the property of the bankruptcy estate and precludes the debtor from pursuing the claim on his or her own behalf” *(Strokes Elec. & Plumbing v Dye,*240 AD2d 919, 920 [1997]; *see Dynamics Corp. of Am. v Marine Midland Bank-N.Y.,*69 NY2d 191, 196-197 [1987]; *Matter of First Montauk Sec. Corp. v Chiulli,*245 AD2d 507 [1997]). We note that this rule applies to chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings *(see Hart Sys. v Arvee Sys.,*244 AD2d 527 [1997]; *Cafferty v Thompson,*223 AD2d 99 [1996]), as well as to chapter 7 proceedings *(see Strokes Elec. & Plumbing v Dye, supra).*

The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Smith, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alex Yemenidjian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



February 20, 2004



/s/    ALEX
YEMENIDJIANAlex YemenidjianChief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Katia West, Appellant.

[53 NYS3d 375]

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J.), rendered August 17, 2015, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Berry, J.), upon a finding that she violated a condition thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of criminal mischief in the second degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the motion of John R. Lewis for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the appellant’s new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Philip H. Schnabel, Esq., 33 Schnabel Lane, Chester, New York 10918, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant’s new assigned counsel; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this *773Court dated January 21, 2016, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings) and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

While we are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by assigned counsel, upon our independent review of the record, we conclude that there are nonfrivolous issues in this case, including, but not necessarily limited to, whether the purported waiver of the defendant’s right to appeal was valid *(see People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; *People v Brown,*122 AD3d 133 [2014]), and, if such waiver is found to be invalid, whether the sentence imposed was excessive *(see generally People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted *(see People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633, 638 [2001]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]).

Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Sgroi, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Price of Fort Lauderdale, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Barbados (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Price of Fort Lauderdale, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Barbados (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 10.40  | 10.39  | 10.39 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 10.39  | 10.39  | 10.40  | 10.39  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Com. v. Neighbor’s First Federal Credit Union Check in Amount of $76,389.27

08/16/2016

226 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 141 A.3d 602
*April 24, 2017*

2017-Ohio-1501.]

2016-0623.

#### Schultheiss v. Heinrich Ents., Inc.

Washington App. No. 15CA20, 2016-Ohio-121. On appellee’s motion to dismiss. Motion denied.
#### In the Matter of Michael A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[54 NYS3d 281]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Passidomo, J.), entered on or about April 25, 2016, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon his admission that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and placed him with the Administration for Children’s Services’ Close to Home program for a period of 18 months, minus 7 days spent in predispositional detention, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant was required to preserve his contention that the court violated Family Court Act § 353.3 (5) by not providing a sufficient record for its denial of full credit for the time he spent in detention *(see generally Matter of Markim Q.,*7 NY3d 405 [2006]), and we decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. Appellant’s claim is analogous to an adult defendant’s claim that a substantively lawful sentence was imposed by way of a defective procedure, and such claims require preservation *(People v Samms,*95 NY2d 52, 58 [2000]). As an alternative holding, we find that, at the dispositional hearing, the court provided a sufficient basis for the denial of credit, and it properly supplemented its oral determination through a subsequent written order.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.