alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rachel A. Ortiz, Respondent, v Thomas M. Boyce, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[768 NYS2d 892]

— Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Notaro, J.), entered February 13, 2003, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting the motion in part, dismissing the claim under the significant disfigurement category of serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), denying the cross motion in part and vacating the determinations that defendant’s negligence was the sole proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries and that plaintiff sustained a serious injury under the permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function or system, permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member, significant limitation of use of a body function or system and significant disfigurement categories of serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *McCabe v Boyce*(2 AD3d 1375 [2003]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Chile (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Chile (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | --     | 13.91  | --     | --     | --     | --     | 5.30   | 5.43   | 4.10   | 4.50  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.17   | 6.85   | 9.55   | 5.58   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Texas Petroleum Land Management, LLC, * From the 118th District Court

Robert Ralph Riggs, of Howard County,

Elizabeth Ann Riggs Lawrence, and Trial Court No. 52811

Jeane Hancock Riggs Weller,

Vs. No. 11-19-00341-CV * February 17, 2022

Dorothy Kalmbach McMillan, * Opinion by Williams, J. 

Kathryn McMillan Taylor, (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Austin Trust Company, and Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

Nancy M. Higgs,

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal are taxed against Texas Petroleum Land Management, LLC, 

Robert Ralph Riggs, Elizabeth Ann Riggs Lawrence, and Jeane Hancock Riggs 

Weller.
# Top logistic officials from the Republic of Korea visit DLA Distribution San Diego 

/ Published Oct. 30, 2019
SAN DIEGO, Calif., 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution San Diego, California, hosted Republic of South Korea Army Maj. Gen. San Ho Lee and members of his staff from Combined Forces Command Korea for a briefing and tour Sept. 19. 

The purpose of the visit was for the coalition partners to become familiar with DLA Distribution San Diego operations while touring the United States as part of the Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore exercise.

“Thank you for inviting us to DLA Distribution Center San Diego,” said Maj. Gen. Lee. “When I see American repair parts coming into ROK, I will smile knowing they are coming from DLA San Diego!”

Navy Capt. Jerome R. White, commander of DLA Distribution San Diego, said he understands the importance of such visits between the United States and its allies.

“As one of many distribution centers in the DLA Distribution network,” White said, “DLA Distribution San Diego’s support for coalition operations in the Combined Forces Command AOR represents the agility and redundancy of DLA’s logistics network. We are honored to provide members from the Combined Forces Command Korea Staff a tour of our facility. It will go a long way in building partnerships and fostering relationships.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MOBILE AMERICA CORP. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        28,298,269
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       37,288,250
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         37,605,051
<EQUITIES>                                   1,946,419
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              80,636,372
<CASH>                                         811,970
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             157,748
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      (3,045,804)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,810,592
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             24,094,485
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         31,476,478
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             10,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       191,110
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,604,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               120,810,592
<PREMIUMS>                                  19,497,196
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          2,349,159
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (30,299)
<OTHER-INCOME>                               4,638,510
<BENEFITS>                                  12,768,376
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  2,021,976
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         8,309,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,354,816
<INCOME-TAX>                                   998,047
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,356,769
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,356,769
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              15,905,704
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         11,475,024
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            1,278,351
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           5,375,244
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            12,915,285
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             10,368,546
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      1,278,351
        

</TABLE>
#### Com. v. Campbell

10/27/2015

206 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1142
2017-0331.

#### State ex rel. Rogers v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

In Mandamus. On relator’s motion for in camera review of records at issue. Motion granted in part. Respondent shall submit the unedited videos responsive to relator’s request to the court under seal for in camera inspection. Request to make videos available to relator’s counsel denied. On relator’s motion to expedite or in the alternative to set a schedule. Motion denied. Sua sponte, alternative writ granted. The following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 12.05. The parties shah file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

O’Donnell, J., dissents and would deny all motions and dismiss the cause.
#### Dhar, Matter of, v Commissioner, N.Y. City (NYC) Dept. of Transp.

1st Dept: 146 AD3d 573

denied
# Welch assumes command for DLA Energy Europe and Africa

/ Published July 1, 2019

In a time-honored tradition, Defense Logistics Agency Energy Europe and Africa Commander Army Lt. Col. Dennis Williams transferred his authority and responsibility to Army Lt. Col. Donna Welch during a change of command ceremony at Vogelweh’ s Community Armstrong’s Club, in Kaiserslautern, Germany, June 24. 

DLA Europe and Africa Commander Army Col. Theodore Shinkle presided over the ceremony and presented Williams with the Defense Meritorious Service Medal. For the past two years, Williams was responsible for the management of 64 million barrels of fuel at a value of $1.3 billion spanning two continents. He ensured the Warfighters had the fuel needed for over 60 exercises in United States European and African Commands. 

“Thank you team!” Williams said. “This organization has supported every service component at every echelon and every tenant unit and organization here in the EUCOM and AFRICOM area of responsibility. I am thankful to have served with them.”

Welch joins DLA Energy from the Office of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency-Defense where she served as the Army Readiness branch chief since August 2017. She assisted in leading a team of professionals providing crisis and contingency geospatial intelligence in support of the Joint Chiefs, Combatant Commands, and the Office of the Secretary of Defense. 

“I’m truly honored and humbled to lead such a great organization, alongside consummate professional who take their mission and support to the Warfighter seriously,” Welch said.
CAAP-11-0000646

#### Woodfall v. Seitz

Affirmed and Remanded
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF AMERIPATH, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of AmeriPath, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph A. Sonnier, M.D.,
President of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Joseph A. Sonnier, M.D.Joseph A. Sonnier, M.D.PresidentAmeriPath, Inc.March 19, 2004
QJ:nugrcss nf life lftnitcb $tates 

maslfillgfoltl 1!1@ 20515 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary ofTransportation 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Secretary Foxx, 

July 15, 2013 !b 

As members of Montana's Congressional delegation, we write in support of our Essential Air Service 

(EAS) communities in Montana. As you know, the Department of Transportation recently issued a 

ruling that the EAS subsidy per passenger for Lewistown and Miles City exceed the amount allowed 

under law. Efficient use of taxpayer dollars is crucial, and we understand Lewistown and Miles City are 

working on a proposal that would ensure more effective use of federal funds compared to the most 

recent contract 

On July 2, both Lewistown and Miles City submitted Petitions for Reconsideration seeking an extension 

of EAS service and appropriate guidance from DOT. We stand with the communities and call on DOT 

to rule in their favor. We believe the communities should be given an opportunity to ensure that EAS 

services can be provided in a way that is consistent with subsidy cap requirements. 

As a recently confirmed Cabinet official, we welcome your leadership on this matter and other 

transportation matters that are important to Montana. As you know, Montana is a state with great 

geographical challenges and many rural communities with unique transportation needs. The EAS 

program was established so rural communities could remain in the mainstream after Congress 

deregulated the airline industry in 1978. Montana jobs rely on EAS. It's a vital program to support our 

small businesses and our thriving tourism industry. We urge you to listen to the communities of 

Lewistov.'ll and Miles City and ask that you weigh their considerations quickly while keeping the lines 

of communication open. 

We call on your office to do everything it can to ensure that Montana's EAS communities can continue 

to rely on the safety and security that comes with access to air travel. Thank you for your attention to 

this matter. 

Steve Daines 

Member of Congress 

--

miNTED ON RE:::YCLED ?APE~
# L_2010269EN.01002301.xml

| 13.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 269/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 269/23

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 918/2010

of 12 October 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Kiełbasa lisiecka (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Kiełbasa lisiecka’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Kiełbasa lisiecka’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 October 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 28, 4.2.2010, p. 26.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

POLAND

Kiełbasa lisiecka (PGI)

---
2017-1532.

#### Treft v. Hancock Cty. Common Pleas Court.

In Mandamus. On respondents’ motions to dismiss. Motions granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Guinevere Habersham, Appellant.

[60 NYS3d 814]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant *410from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered October 28, 2015, as amended February 3, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
# Utah materials examiner honored

/ Published March 19, 2020
Battle Creek, Mich., 
Materials Examiner and Identifier Jerald Dewolf is the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services category one Employee of the Quarter for the start of fiscal 2020.

Dewolf said he grew up in Utah, graduating from Valley High School in Riverton in 2006. He enlisted in the Air Force in 2008 and specialized in ground fuels for six years, deploying twice and serving in Illinois, Germany, and at Utah’s Hill Air Force Base. He was discharged as a senior airman and came to work for DLA Disposition Services at Hill, where he grew into a site leadership role.

“I love my job, being able to help teach our people how to achieve their goals and learn their jobs to the best of their ability,” Dewolf said. “I would not have been able to get where I have if it was not for the amazing team we have here at Hill. We strive to be the best and will continue to work toward that goal.”

Dewolf’s award nomination said “his loyalty to DLA is a model for aspiring wage-grade employees. ... [His] selfless volunteerism to maximize production every Saturday contributed to 9,242 receipt documents during November.” His “benchmark efforts” were also cited for helping Hill achieve full mission production capability at 10 work stations during a headquarters tiger team assistance visit, helping maximize the site’s consolidated receipt production capability.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Leonard R.
Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Morgans Foods, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended May 22, 2011, (the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: July 6, 2011



/s/ Leonard R. Stein-SapirLeonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer




19
#### Com. v. Mullin

09/23/2015

469 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 1066
Rule 3170 Clean Air Act Fee Assessment, Fee Year 20XX

Facility: XYZ Widget Manufacturing, Inc.Facility Address:Facility Number: Z-222Facility Major for NOx?: Yes, fee applicableFacility Major for VOC?: No, fee not applicable

CEU CEU NOx 

Permit Number Equipment Description A. Fee Year B. Baseline for NOx? Credit ($) D. Fee Year E. Baselin

Z-222-1-3 Natural Gas Fired Boiler 20 22.5 no NA NA NA Z-222-2-0 Widget Stamper 5 5 yes $8,500 NA NA Z-222-5-3 Aluminum Crucible 8 7 no NA NA NA 

Total Facility Emissions (tons): 33 34.5 NA NA

Emissions subject to fee: 5.4 NA

Total Facility Fees/(Credits): $45,900 ($8,500) NA 

$37,400

Notes: 1) Fees (and credits) are based on the calculations specified in Rule 3170:

Fee= (Fee Year emissions - (80% of Baseline Emissions)) x Fee Rate

2) Fee Rate for 20XX is $8500/ton ($5000/ton in 1990 dollars, adjusted for federal CPI)3) CEU = Clean Emissions Unit4) NA = Not Applicable

NOx Emissions (tons/yr) VOC Emissions (tons/y

Total Facility Fees (NOx fees plus VOC fees minus credits):

Attachment I - Sample Fee Calculation Worksheet
Exhibit 10.1


 


Summary of Plan Terms for 2006 Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan


 


The Advent
Software 2006 Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan (“the Plan”) is designed to
motivate and reward the Executive Team for short-term achievement of key
bookings, revenue and operating profit milestones during the 2006 fiscal year.
A summary of the terms follows:


 


•      The
Plan is applicable to the President and CEO and executive-level direct reports
of the CEO (the “Executives”)


 


•      The
individual plans establish various target amounts, performance measures and
goals of the cash bonuses awarded under the Plan for each Executive.


 


•      Target
amounts range from a total per individual of $54,367 to $250,100.


 


•      Plan
targets are based on bookings, recognized revenue, operating profit and
individual executive performance relative to goals.


 


•      The
Plan is an annual plan and is effective for the fiscal year end of 2006 and any
bonuses earned will be paid in the first quarter of 2007.


 


•      The
Plan may be renewed at the election of the Company for future periods.