alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11.
                                MOBIL CORPORATION
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                   (In millions, except for per-share amounts;
                         number of shares in thousands)



                                                           For the Three Months
                                                              Ended March 31,

                                                           --------------------

                                                                1997      1998
                                                            --------   --------


Net Income ...............................................    $  826     $  705
Less: dividends on preferred stock .......................        13         13
                                                              ------     ------
Adjusted net income applicable to common shares ..........    $  813     $  692

                                                              ======     ======
Weighted average number of basic common shares outstanding   788,149    782,117
                                                             =======    =======

Net income per common share ..............................    $ 1.03     $  .88

                                                              ======     ======


Net Income ...............................................    $  826     $  705
Less: additional contribution to ESOP ....................         2          1
Less: Stock Appreciation Rights compensation
        (expense) income .................................        (1)         4
                                                              ------     ------
Adjusted net income applicable to common shares ..........    $  825     $  700

                                                              ======     ======
Weighted average number of basic common shares outstanding   788,149    782,117
Issuable on assumed exercise of stock options ............    10,644     11,373

Assumed conversion of preferred stock ....................    17,502     17,000
                                                             -------    -------
     Total ...............................................   816,296    810,490
                                                             =======    =======

Net income per common share -- assuming dilution .........    $ 1.01     $  .86

                                                              ======     ======








MOBIL                                 - 17 -


<PAGE>
Department of Defense heads of Supply and Logistics visit DLA Distribution  Sigonella, Italy
 
  By Dawn Bonsell, DLA Distribution Public Affairs
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,065]


General Motors Corporation, Delphi Division, Albany, New York; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on December 8, 1997, in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on behalf of workers at Delphi Division of General 
Motors, Albany, Georgia.
    The petitioning group of workers is subject to an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued (TA-W-
34, 060). Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve 
no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 21st day of December, 1997,
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-1475 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
October 15, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KIMBERLY WOODFORK, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00927-CV V.

BANK OF AMERICA, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, BANK OF 

AMERICA, signed September 24, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. 

We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the 

judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, KIMBERLY WOODFORK, to pay all costs incurred in 

this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2024 11 17756

2024 21 480603

2024 31 259551

2024 32 86712

2024 41 317

2024 42 158

2024 43 2105

2024 51 232

2024 52 14344

2024 53 2286

2024 54 3428

2024 61 3047

2024 62 4455
Exhibit 13.1

Section 906 Certification

The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Claudio Melandri, the
Chief Executive Officer, Miguel Mata, the Chief Financial Officer, and Gabriel Montoya, the Financial Controller, of Banco Santander-Chile, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Banco Santander-Chile.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2013



/s/ Claudio MelandriName:

Claudio MelandriTitle:

Chief Executive Officer/s/ Miguel MataName:

Miguel MataTitle:

Chief Financial Officer/s/ Gabriel MontoyaName:

Gabriel MontoyaTitle:

Financial Controller
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.7



THIRD AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF THE DESIGNATION, PREFERENCES RIGHTS AND
LIMITATIONS OF SERIES D 6% CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE NONVOTING PARTICIPATING
PREFERRED STOCK OF MICRO-MEDIA SOLUTIONS, INC.

     Micro-Media Solutions, Inc., hereinafter called the "Corporation", a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Utah,

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     That, pursuant to authority conferred upon the Board of Directors by the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, and pursuant to Section
16-10a-602 of the Utah Business Corporation Act, such Board of Directors by the
unanimous written consent of its members dated effective June 26, 1998 adopted a
resolution providing for a third amendment to that certain Certificate of
Designation filed by the Corporation with the Secretary of the State of Utah on
April 21, 1998, amended by that certain Amendment to Certificate of Designation
adopted by the Corporation as of April 30, 1998 and filed with the Secretary of
the State of Utah on May 14, 1998, and amended by that Second Amendment to
Certificate of Designation adopted by the Corporation as of May 1, 1998 and
filed with the Secretary of State of Utah on May 27, 1998 to increase the
designation of Series D 6% Cumulative Convertible Non-Voting Participating
Preferred Stock, $10.60 stated value per share, from 274,407 shares to 279,657
shares, which resolution is as follows:

     RESOLVED, that pursuant to the authority conferred upon the Board of
Directors by the Certificate of Incorporation, the Series D 6% Cumulative
Convertible Non-Voting Participating Preferred Stock, $10.60 stated value per
share ("Series D Preferred Stock"), that was created on April 21, 1998 by that
certain Certificate of the Designation, Preferences, Rights, and Limitations of
Series D 6% Cumulative Convertible Non-Voting Participating Preferred Stock of
the Corporation, as amended, is hereby further amended to increase the number of
shares created from Two Hundred Seventy-Four Thousand Four Hundred Seven
(274,407) shares of Series D Preferred Stock to Two Hundred Seventy-Nine
Thousand Six Hundred Fifty-Seven (279,657) shares of Series D Preferred Stock.
The voting powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other
special rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof
shall remain the same.

1. This resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation
and it was also duly adopted by all of the holders of outstanding shares of
Series D Preferred Stock.

2. The foregoing resolution does not provide for an exchange, reclassification,
or cancellation of issued shares of the Corporation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Micro-Media Solutions, Inc. has caused this certificate
to be signed by Jose Chavez, its President, and attested by Mitchell C.
Kettrick, its Secretary, this 26th day of June, 1998.


MICRO-MEDIA SOLUTIONS, INC.
By /s/ JOSE CHAVEZ, President

ATTEST:
By /s/ Mitchell C. Kettrick, Secretary
Order entered September 2, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00643

- CV

DENISE EDWARDS, INDI VIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF G.E., MINO R,

Appellant

V.

PROGRESSIVE COUNTY M UTUAL INSURANCE COMP ANY, Appellee

On Appe al from the 86th District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 90628.86



### O RDER

B e cause appellant’s brief was filed August 28, 2014, we DENY as moot her motion to

extend the deadline to December 1, 2014

.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS

JUSTICE
# L_2011188EN.01001901.xml

| 19.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 188/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 188/19

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION 2011/422/CFSP

of 18 July 2011

implementing Decision 2010/603/CFSP on further measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Decision 2010/603/CFSP of 7 October 2010 on further measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) (1), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Decision 2010/603/CFSP the Council adopted measures to freeze all funds and economic resources belonging to the natural persons listed in the Annex thereto, who had been indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Decision 2010/603/CFSP the Council adopted measures to freeze all funds and economic resources belonging to the natural persons listed in the Annex thereto, who had been indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY).

| (2) | Following the transfer of Ratko MLADIC to the custody of the ICTY on 31 May 2011, his name should be removed from the list in the Annex to Decision 2010/603/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the transfer of Ratko MLADIC to the custody of the ICTY on 31 May 2011, his name should be removed from the list in the Annex to Decision 2010/603/CFSP.

| (3) | The list contained in the Annex to Decision 2010/603/CFSP should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The list contained in the Annex to Decision 2010/603/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 2010/603/CFSP shall be replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 18 July 2011.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 265, 8.10.2010, p. 15.

1

---

ANNEX

‘ANNEX

List of persons referred to in Article 1

| | Individual | Reason |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | Name: HADZIC Goran (male)
  Date of birth: 7.9.1958
  Place of birth: Vinkovci, Croatia
  National of Serbia | Indicted by the ICTY and still at large

  Indictment: 4 June 2004


  Case No: IT-04-75’ |

Individual

Reason

1.

Name: HADZIC Goran (male)

Date of birth: 7.9.1958

Place of birth: Vinkovci, Croatia

National of Serbia

Indicted by the ICTY and still at large

Indictment: 4 June 2004

Case No: IT-04-75’

---
#### In the Matter of 18 St. Marks Place Trident LLC, Appellant, v State of New York Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Office of Rent Administration, Respondent.

[50 NYS3d 273]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered August 19, 2016, which denied the CPLR article 78 petition seeking to, among other things, vacate respondent’s determination dated March 14, 2016, which affirmed a rent administrator’s order finding that an apartment owned by petitioner was not eligible for deregulation and awarding the tenant an overcharge, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the petition granted, the rent administrator’s order reversed, the overcharge annulled, and it is declared that the legal regulated rent for the apartment is *575$2,035.13 per month and that the apartment is not subject to rent stabilization.

Respondent’s determination allowing charges for installation of new drywall and flooring, but disallowing expenses related to finishing the new surfaces, was irrational (see *Matter of West Vil. Assoc. v Division of Hous. & Community Renewal,*277 AD2d 111, 112 [1st Dept 2000]). Here, the invoice listed the costs for painting and floor finishing of the entire apartment relative to the installation of the new floors and new walls in an easily discernible manner. The invoice submitted by petitioner reflected a charge of $1,680 for painting 1,750 square feet of interior surfaces. It also showed that 1,200 square feet of new drywall was installed. Thus, 68.57% of the total painting charge, or $1,151.98, was attributable to the new drywall, and that charge should have been allowed.

Similarly, respondent allowed charges for 144 square feet of new, unfinished wood flooring. Since the charge for finishing 675 square feet of wood flooring was $1,809, 21.33% of the total cost was attributable to the new flooring, or $385.92, which should have been allowed.

Thus, the total costs of improving the apartment after the 2008 vacancy should have been $22,733.50, l/40th of which petitioner was allowed to pass on to the tenant *(see*9 NYCRR 2522.4 [a] [4]). Accordingly, based on the formula used by respondent, the legal regulated rent for the apartment is $2,035.13 per month ($1,264.48 for rent prior to the vacancy, plus $202.31 for the vacancy increase, plus $568.34 for improvements), which is above the $2,000 threshold for deregulation *(see*Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 [Administrative Code of City of NY] § 26-504.2 [a]).

Concur — Acosta, J.R, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MOBILE AMERICA CORPORATION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        18,537,484
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       22,041,303
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         21,801,100
<EQUITIES>                                   1,549,337
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              54,033,329
<CASH>                                       1,047,387
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          12,870,475
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                        (909,662)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,516,808
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             30,136,592
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         22,729,860
<POLICY-OTHER>                               3,081,965
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,211,152
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              7,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       191,110
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,308,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               107,516,808
<PREMIUMS>                                  23,033,849
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          2,740,692
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             147,533
<OTHER-INCOME>                               4,063,637
<BENEFITS>                                  22,360,102
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  5,518,173
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        11,848,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (9,740,744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (3,941,422)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,799,322)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,799,322)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.80)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              11,400,127
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         18,986,585
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            3,343,418
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          10,242,897
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            10,462,897
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             13,026,457
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      3,343,418


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Forms S-8
(Nos. 333-9354 and 333-139512) pertaining to the employees stock option plans of Elbit
Systems Ltd. of our report dated March 13, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Elbit Systems Ltd. and
subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2006.

| |                                 
| | --------------------------------
| | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
| | Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer    
| | A member of Ernst & Young Global

Haifa, Israel, June 14, 2007
Charge Questions

AEATF Liquid Pour Study Proposal 

Study Title: “A Study for Measurement of Potential Dermal and Inhalation Exposure During 

Manual Pouring of a Liquid Containing an Antimicrobial” 

If the AEATF liquid pour study proposal is revised as suggested in EPA’s review and if the 

research is performed as described: 

1. Is the research likely to generate scientifically reliable data, useful for assessing the 

exposure of individuals who manually pour liquid antimicrobial products? 

2. Is the research likely to meet the applicable requirements of 40 CFR part 26, subparts K 

and L?
2017-0527.

#### State ex rel. Staats v. State.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
# L_2014054EN.01002301.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 54/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 54/23

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2010/78/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 amending Directives 98/26/EC, 2002/87/EC, 2003/6/EC, 2003/41/EC, 2003/71/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2004/109/EC, 2005/60/EC, 2006/48/EC, 2006/49/EC and 2009/65/EC in respect of the powers of the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 331 of 15 December 2010
  )

On page 133, Article 6, Amendments to Directive 2004/39/EC, point (4), new paragraph 8 to be added to Article 10a,

for:

‘8.   In order to ensure consistent harmonisation of this Article, ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to establish an exhaustive list of information, referred to in paragraph 4 to be included by proposed acquirers in their notification, without prejudice to paragraph 2

...’,

read:

‘8.   In order to ensure consistent harmonisation of this Article, ESMA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to establish an exhaustive list of information, referred to in Article 10b (4) to be included by proposed acquirers in their notification, without prejudice to paragraph 2.

...’.

---
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (3)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended May 24,
2009 (the Report), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(4)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Kenneth L. HignettKenneth L. Hignett, Senior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### John S. Cazeau, Appellant, v Marc Paul et al., Respondents.

[767 NYS2d 895]

*478In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Huttner, J.), dated August 29, 2002, which denied his motion to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the action is restored to the trial calendar.

A case dismissed pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27 may be restored only if the plaintiff can demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious cause of action *(see*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; *Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv.,*282 AD2d 190, 197 [2001]). Such a motion must be made within one year after service of the order or judgment entered upon the default *(see*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). In this case, the plaintiff made a timely motion to restore the action to the trial calendar. In addition, the plaintiff set forth a meritorious cause of action in his affidavit of merit, and the temporary inability of counsel to contact his client constituted a reasonable excuse for the default. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.