alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                              
|No chart available.                                                                              
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Spain (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | W   |     |     |     | W   |     |     |     |    
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     | W   | W   |     | W   |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>                 THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                         EXTRACTED  FROM  ANR  PIPELINE  COMPANY  FORM  10-Q
                         QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                         1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                         TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                   3
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          369
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                             28
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       401
<PP&E>                                               3,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       1,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  257
<BONDS>                                                504
<COMMON>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                             705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         1,768
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       549
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          313
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      47
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        189
<INCOME-TAX>                                            70
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    119
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           119
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
#### State of New York, Matter of, v Patrick L.

2d Dept: 141 AD3d 591

denied*

*

 Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic or denied.
Memorandum

To   United States Department of Energy  

From  Benjamin Longstreth, Natural Resources Defense Council

Date   June 13, 2012

Re   Ex Parte Communication

On Monday, June 11, 2012, representatives of several States and representatives of

several non‐profit energy efficiency organizations met with representatives of the

Department of Energy to discuss the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Energy

Conservation Standards for Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies, Docket No.

EERE‐2008‐BT‐STD‐0005, 77 Fed. Reg. 18478 (March 27, 2012). The efficiency advocates

discussed a number of flaws in the analysis published by the Department of Energy,

including the estimate of costs for more efficient products and the baseline energy use

assumed in the analysis.  

The following individuals were present:

Kathleen Hogan, DOE

John Cymbalsky, DOE   

Jeremy Dommu, DOE

Andrew DeLaski, Appliance Standards Awareness Project

Joanna Mauer, Appliance Standards Awareness Project

David Hungerford, California Energy Commission   

Benjamin Longstreth, Natural Resources Defense Council

Jeff Harris, Alliance to Save Energy

Jennifer Amann, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy

David Terry, National Association of State Energy Officials

Respectfully submitted,  

s/ Benjamin Longstreth

Natural Resources Defense Council
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 12

                 U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, Inc.
               RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (Dollars in Millions)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                         <C>       <C>
                                          Quarter Ended
                                           3/31/97  3/31/96
-------------------------------------------------- --------
Income before income taxes, extra-
  ordinary item and cumulative effect
  of change in accounting principles          $564     $480
Interest expense (net of amounts
  capitalized)                                  96      103
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                15       13
                                          -------- --------
Earnings                                      $675     $596

Interest expense                              $103     $116
Interest factor on rentals (1/3)                15       13
                                          -------- --------
Fixed charges                                 $118     $129

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            5.72     4.62
-------------------------------------------------- --------

</TABLE>
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|No chart available.                                                           
|No chart available.                                                           
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Florida Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
# DLA R&D to host Industry Day

/ Published Oct. 9, 2019
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency Research and Development will host its 4th annual Industry Day for industry and academic partners Nov. 7 from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the McNamara Headquarters Complex. 

DLA R&D representatives will give presentations on agency programs that support emerging capabilities, highlighting strategic focus, strong partnerships, modernization and emerging needs. Topics will include manufacturing technology such as Additive Manufacturing, Battery Network, Subsistence Network and Military Unique Sustainment Technology; logistics research and development such as Strategic Distribution and Disposition, the Energy Readiness Program and Supply Chain Management; and small business innovation programs such as Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer. 

Attendees will have the opportunity to talk to R&D program managers and attend program breakouts following the presentations. 

To attend the event, register at https://dla-research-and-development-industryday2019.eventbrite.com.
DLA Strategic Plan amended, available online
 
  By DLA Public Affairs
  The Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Plan has been amended to maintain relevancy and continuity of the existing plan.
Major changes include the addition of three objectives under the Warfighter Support line of effort and one under Always Accountable, as well as two new categories: Cross-Cutting Efforts and Critical Capabilities.
Warfighter First, in which the agency makes its first priority strengthening service readiness and lethality, now emphasizes goals pertaining to the space enterprise, support to Department of Defense reform initiatives and demand projections.
“Working collaboratively with our service, Whole of Government and industry partners, we will improve projections and reduce demand planning errors to increase service readiness and the buying power for DoD and supported federal agencies,” the amended plan states.
Reducing rates and providing greater transparency to military and WoG partners is the new objective under Always Accountable. It includes improving alignment of DLA financial procurement and operations processes to better capture the total cost of goods and services.
The new focus on Cross-Cutting Efforts poses three objectives: making auditability every employee’s responsibility, gaining efficiencies and maximizing savings through DoD reforms, and strengthening operational resiliency through supply chain security.
Critical Capabilities includes People and Culture objectives as well as Enterprise Enablers, which strengthens the focus on innovation, technology, data management and cybersecurity, four critical capabilities that are essential to the DLA workforce accomplishing strategic and operational objectives.
“We will continue to focus on all four as enablers to help drive the constant transformation required to meet rapidly shifting warfighter needs. With innovation, our technology stays fresh and allows us to grow and exploit our data,” according to the plan.
The amended plan is available for download the DLA Strategic Plan website.
# DLA Installation Management Susquehanna Fire and Emergency Services takes advantage of unique training opportunity

/ Published July 18, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
As good stewards of the taxpayers’ dollars, the Defense Logistics Agency is always looking to fully utilize any and all materials on-hand before asking for more. From the paper used in office printers to propane tanks that fuel warehouse forklifts, DLA personnel are known for making the most of what they’re given.

One example of this “culture of frugality” can be seen in the recent demolition of base housing units at the agency’s Defense Distribution Center, New Cumberland. When the decision was made to divest the installation of its family housing mission, workers began pulling copper, aluminum and all other recyclable materials from the structures.

But one of the more creative ways to garner the last remaining use of the buildings came from the base fire department when they were given permission to set fire to two of the housing units in order to train their personnel.

For a short video clip of the controlled burn training, click here: https://youtu.be/PDdFe_1V6u8

“We’re doing structural burn training, meaning we’re lighting a house on fire and then putting the fire out,” says John Fogg, Recue Company captain with the Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna Fire Department. “It allows them to get the most accurate scenario in real time where everything can be done that they normally do at a house fire without somebody’s life or property being on the line.”

As one of the few full-time (i.e., non-volunteer) fire departments in the New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, area, Fogg and his fellow firefighters often work with local companies, responding to emergencies throughout the Harrisburg area. So, when permission was granted to conduct a controlled burn on base, invitations were made to other units outside the installation. Several civilian departments jumped at the chance.

“Primarily it’s our own guys from Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna Fire and Emergency Services, but then we also brought in some of our mutual-aid fire departments,” Fogg says, who was not surprised by the response. “This training is just as real as it can be without the unknown factor of somebody’s life being in danger.”

While this type of experience may be out of the ordinary, training with other departments is not. Not unlike military training, Fogg says preparation is the key to a successful mission.

“We have 45 total members of our fire department and then on duty every day we have a minimum of 13. So, every day here we’re training approximately 13 of our own guys plus whatever comes in mutual aid.”
*October 31, 2017*

2017-Ohio-8365.]

*14222016-1783.

#### State v. Bates.

Hamilton C.P. No. B1501811. On appellant’s motion to unseal record. Motion denied. Counsel for appellant may come to the Supreme Court of Ohio clerk’s office to review the sealed documents.
No. 12-8662.

#### Lillard *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**ON REHEARING**
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7775** 

JAMES CLAUDE GREER, II , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. Director, VADOC , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Glen E. Conrad , Chief District Judge. ( 7:15

- cv - 00432

- GEC

- RSB )

Submitted : May 5 , 2016 Decided: May 10, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion
.
James Claude Greer, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Claude Greer, II, seeks to appeal the district

co urt’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition . Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the
appe al period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
Because Greer i s incarcerated, the notice of appeal is considered filed on the date it was “deposited in the institution’s internal mailing system
. ” Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); accord Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). In his petition for rehearing * of our original opinion, Greer avers that he timely delivered his notice of appeal to the prison mailroom for filing. The record does not conclusively reveal when Greer delivered the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we rema nd the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine this fact and, having done so, to determine whether the filing was timely

* Because no member of the court has requested a poll, Greer’s petition for en banc rehearing is denied.3 under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1). The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for f urther consideration.

REMANDED
# Army leader shares military perspective, Asian heritage

/ Published May 16, 2019
Fort Belvoir, Virginia,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MSI
HOLDINGS, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999 AS RESTATED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         385,132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  403,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     14,742
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               938,936
<PP&E>                                       2,782,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                 734,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,986,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          766,654
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    681,630
<COMMON>                                     2,265,021
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,638,674)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,986,721
<SALES>                                        449,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               449,143
<CGS>                                          507,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  507,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,410,262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,556
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,517,121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,517,121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,517,121)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Kathleen K. Johnson et al., Appellants, v Union Bank of Switzerland, AG, Respondent.

[51 NYS3d 417]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered on or about August 24, 2016, which denied petitioners’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c) for pre-action disclosure, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered November 29, 2016, which, upon reargument, adhered to the determination on the original motion, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion for pre-action discovery on the ground that, while the motion was pending, petitioners commenced an action, i.e., filed a summons and complaint *(see Matter of Goldstein v New York Daily News,*106 AD2d 323 [1st Dept 1984]). Disclosure may only be obtained under CPLR 3102 (c) “ [b] efore an action is commenced.”

Petitioners also failed to demonstrate that they have a meritorious cause of action and that the information they seek is “material and necessary to the actionable wrong” *(Holzman v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*271 AD2d 346, 347 [1st Dept 2000]). Rather, they seek broad discovery to determine whether they may have a valid cause of action against Union Bank of Switzerland or other possible wrongdoers *(see Bishop v Stevenson Commons Assoc., L.P.,*74 AD3d 640 [1st Dept 2010], *lv denied*16 NY3d 702 [2011]).

Concur— Richter, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.