alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas Novembe r 29, 2017 No. 04 - 17 - 00366 - CR & 04 - 17 - 00367 - CR Roger Trudell DAVIS , Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015CR3461 & 2015CR6145 Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The clerk’s records and reporter’s records have been filed in both Appeal No s . 04 - 17 - 00366 - CR and 04 - 17 - 00367 - CR. The C ourt has examined the records and is of the opinion that, in the interest of efficient administration, they should be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument . We, therefore, ORDER Appeal Nos. 04 - 17 - 00366 - CR and 04 - 17 - 00367 - CR consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument on appeal. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is request ed and granted, the entire case must be argued as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a single appeal. The C ourt will dispose of the appeals with the same judgment, opinion, and mandate. This order does not extend the briefing schedule.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of November, 2017 .

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of Rosandre Burgher, Petitioner, v William J. Bratton et al., Respondents.

[62 NYS3d 803]—

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated July 23, 2015, which terminated petitioner’s employment as a New York City police officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Lucy Billings, J.], entered May 17, 2016), dismissed, without costs.

The determination finding petitioner guilty of three specifications is supported by substantial evidence *(see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human*Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180-181 [1978]), and there exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations of the Hearing Officer *(see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]). Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the Hearing Officer gave preclusive effect to the minor’s conviction for filing a false instrument *(see Matter of State of N.Y. Off. of Mental Health [New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn., Inc.],*46 AD3d 1269, 1271 [3d Dept 2007], *lv dismissed*10 NY3d 826 [2008]), but based her determination on statements of the minor that were not a subject of the false instrument and were corroborated by documents and her assessment of petitioner’s credibility.

The penalty of termination does not shock our sense of fair*418ness in light of the seriousness of the charges and respondents’ responsibility to account “to the public for the integrity of the Department” *(Matter of Hopper v Kelly,*106 AD3d 530, 530 [1st Dept 2013]; *see Matter of Gonzalez v Kelly,*114 AD3d 591 [1st Dept 2014]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Oing and Singh, JJ.
# DLA Europe & Africa runs, walks for Army's 245th birthday

/ Published June 16, 2020
KAISERSLAUTERN, Germany, 
While they couldn't run together as a group due to COVID-19, members of the Defense Logistics Agency Europe & Africa team ran or walked 2.45  their own to celebrate the Army's 245th birthday. 

The Army celebrated 245 years of protecting and defending the United States on June 14. The runners and walkers, from multiple DLA Europe & Africa elements, logged their 2.45 miles over the weekend leading up to the Army birthday.
EXHIBIT
13.1





Certification of the Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), T.C. Leung, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





January
23, 2009





/s/
      T.C.
      LeungT.C.
      LeungChief
      Executive Officer
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20132 Summary Calendar

__________________ GLORIA TREVINO TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. MC-H-95-0004
- - - - - - - - - - November 20, 1995 Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gloria Trevino Turner appeals the district court's order denying her application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Because Turner's affidavit and financial information indicate that she is not able to meet the costs of this litigation without undue hardship, the decision denying IFP is REVERSED. See Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. , 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948);No. 95-20132 -2- Flowers v. Turbine Support Division , 507 F.2d 1242, 1244-46 (5th Cir. 1975). As no transcript is necessary for the proper disposition of this appeal, Turner's request for a transcript at Government expense is DENIED. See Harvey v. Andrist , 754 F.2d 569, 571 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 471 U.S. 1126 (1985). REVERSED AND REMANDED.
# Utah students benefit from Computers for Learning

/ Published Feb. 13, 2019
HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah, 
A recent effort to put computers in front of Utah students started when DLA Disposition Services Director Mike Cannon sent out an email to his workforce. 

In the email, Cannon explained that portions of the military would soon upgrade their computers so there would be an influx of computers being turned in by the services. 

After reading Cannon’s email, Property Disposal Specialist Jared Grimshaw at Hill Air Force Base, Utah, learned his team would soon receive more than 40,000 computers. 

“I jumped on Google, grabbed the contact info for the schools and started cold calling,” Grimshaw said. 

He called more than 30 public and private schools in his surrounding area to tell them about Computers for Learning and he said Layton Christian Academy showed interest. 

Layton Christian Academy has 150 students from pre-school through 12th grade. The school was looking to update a computer lab.

While getting the school registered into the program, Grimshaw learned that the school had been involved in the program in the past but the person who had been registered for the school had retired and the school’s registration had lapsed. 

Grimshaw then worked with Jose Aguero, DLA’s computers for learning program manager to help Chris Crowder, an assistant administrator at the academy, to get the school back in to the program.

The timing could not have been better for the academy. They had updated two of their three computers labs and wanted to get the third one done. One bump along the way occurred when the academy picked up their first batch of computers only to discover technical problems that prevented their use. 

The school tried again and this time the computers were clear of any issues before they were turned in to DLA, allowing the school to put them to work educating students. 

Crowder said the academy received 60 working laptops from Hill. They needed new hard drives and to replace some missing power cords. 

Crowder said that earlier they upgraded two of the school’s three computer labs at a cost of $56,000.Crowder said that thanks to the laptops from DLA it cost just $2,500 to get the third computer lab up to date. 

“The new administration worked diligently with myself and the CFL office at (Battle Creek) to gain access,” Grimshaw said, “with a few bumps and bruises along the way, but victorious in the end.”
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1850 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1850

   To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-(4-chloro-2-methyl phenoxy) 
                            propionic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 10 (legislative day, January 25), 1994

 Mr. Danforth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-(4-chloro-2-methyl phenoxy) 
                            propionic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 2-(4-CHLORO-2-METHYL 
              PHENOXY) PROPIONIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
    

       ``  9902.31.12   2-(4-chloro-2-methyl phenoxy)            No change      No change      On or before     
                         propionic acid (CAS No. 93-                                            12/31/96        
                         65-2) (provided for in                                                                 
                         subheading 2918.90.10)......  Free                                                     
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
### RECEIVED - 6fJJt 

## AIR "LANNING SEC, 

## 09 JAN 20 

# ttl 5= 25 

# State 

# ofNew Mexico Officeof the Governor Bill Richardson Governor January 13, 2009 MayorRichard Greene Regional Administrator (6-A) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, 

### IX 75202-2733 

# ==0)=**O~o::a**

## r:5'~?" 

# . , 

# .,. .. 

# '.i 

# i p 

# f**-<"~I** .. 

### .n 

### +: •**.~**



## - ";:: 

### : :

• to .' -. f '

# ~!~~~ ?" 

# P :"'J D /it1. 

### ::: •. g2! '/' 

# . .. : 

# .

" 

### : 

# . . : 

# . .. .. = : : : :- 

### .. 

# . .. 

## .. ... 

### : : : : 

### ::. • • .. *. ""'. 

## : :: 

### : :: 

### : 

# . : 

## .. ::' 

# . : : :

DearMayor Greene: By this letter, New Mexico is resubmitting its 40 CFR 51.309 state implementationplan (SIP), which we originally submitted on December 31, 2003. Specifically, we are resubmitting sections A and Band D through L, includingappendices associated with these sections, which we believe satisfY the requirements under 40 CFR 51.309(d)(I) through (3) and (5) through (12). We do not believe those portions ofthe SIP previously submitted require revision. Otherportions ofthe SIP are currently undergoing revision due to revisions to the Regional Haze Rule at 40 CFR 51.309(d)(4), and we willsubmit these portions ofthe SIP under separate cover in 2009. New Mexico will also submit a SIP revision pursuant to 40 CFR 51.309(g) for Class I areas not within the Colorado Plateau in 2009. Ifyou have any questions regarding the New Mexico Eduction DepqrtInent's efforts with respect to the Regional Haze State Implementation Plan, please feel free to contact Mary Uhl, Chief, Air Quality Bureau, EnvironmentDepartment at (505) 476-4301 orbye-mail at mary.uhl@state.nm.us. Sincerely,

Bill Richardson Gnvemor ofNew Mexico BR/mr

cc: Ron Curry,Secretary, NMED JimNorton, Director, NMED Environmental Protection Division Mary Ubi, Chief, NMED Air Quality Bureau

State Capitol • Room 400 • SantaFe, NewMexico 87501 • 505-476-2200 • www.governor.state.nm.us
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2023                                                                                                                              | 40.24 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Exhibit 32.2




Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(b) and section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








I, Bryn Harman, Chief Financial Officer of HuntMountain Resources Ltd., certify that:








1.           This quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HuntMountain Resources Ltd. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HuntMountain Resources Ltd.









Date: August 19, 2009BRYN HARMANBryn Harman, CFA, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          17,313
<SECURITIES>                                   353,425
<RECEIVABLES>                                  427,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,432
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          45,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,198,374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        208,202
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              287
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,899
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,198,374
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,462
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,491
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,990)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (739)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,251)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,251)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (27,688)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (27,688)


</TABLE>
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, AT A, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGAN IZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Barry Bannister 6/24114 No response. 

A4A Bob Ireland 6/24114 No response. 

Other/Additional Information:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Aquila, Inc.**

**Chief Accounting Officer**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

|   | I, Beth A. Armstrong, certify that: |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

 

|   | 1. | Aquila, Inc.’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2007 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aquila, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: August 2, 2007

 

|   | /s/ Beth A. Armstrong |
|--------|-----------------------|

|   | Beth A. Armstrong |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | Senior Vice President and |
|--------|---------------------------|

Chief Accounting Officer 

Aquila, Inc.
**Exhibit 99(a)**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of ALLTELCorporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, Scott T. Ford, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Scott T. Ford                     |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Scott T. Ford                         |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| May 14, 2003                          |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to ALLTEL Corporation and will be retained by ALLTEL Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----