alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      987
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,458
<PP&E>                                           2,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,636
<BONDS>                                          1,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,981
<SALES>                                          2,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,896
<CGS>                                            2,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  36
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     68
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 43
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        43
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent Turturro, Appellant.

[59 NYS3d 308]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered December 11, 2014, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submit*423ting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Moskowitz and Gesmer, JJ.
Alamo Aircraft Supply, Inc., Alamo Aircraft, Ltd.,



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

June 6, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00057

- CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

, Appellant

v.

ALAMO AIRCRAFT SUPPLY, INC ., Alamo Aircraft, Ltd., Wulfe Rentals, Ltd., and Lobo GC, Ltd., Appellee s
From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 08223 Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellees filed their brief on May 21, 2014. Appellant City of San Antonio’s reply brief is due on June 10, 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6( c). On June 6, 2014, Appellant filed a motion for a fifteen

- day extension of time to file the reply brief.
Appellant ’ s motion is GRANTED

. A ppellant ’ s reply brief must be filed not later than June 25 , 201 4

. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE THE REPLY BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha ve hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Price of Doral, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Bahamas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Price of Doral, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Bahamas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 10.40  | 10.39  | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7963.

#### Morozova *v.*Callow.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-02-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-18-1996
<CASH>                                       3,334,000
<SECURITIES>                                   242,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    370,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,117,000
<PP&E>                                      25,585,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,011,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,650,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,327,000
<BONDS>                                     11,068,000
<COMMON>                                       178,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,077,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,650,000
<SALES>                                      9,554,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,554,000
<CGS>                                        5,542,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,272,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (20,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             273,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
2017-0170.

#### Krohn v. Krohn.

Wood App. No. WD-16-010, 2016-Ohio-8379.
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 6.92   | 5.05  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.02   | 7.01   | --     | 7.56   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2016-1633.

#### State v. Hayes.

Montgomery App. No. 26379, 2016-Ohio-7241.

O’Donnell, J., dissents and would accept the cause on proposition of law No. I.
#### Rearick v. Elderton State Bank

08/30/2016

74 WAL (2016)

Denied
#### Com. v. Johnson

09/21/2015

255 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1123
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6349

HARRY JAMES FOWLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FORREST A. FERRELL, Judge; BEVERLY T. BEAL,

Superior Court Judge; ROGER HUTCHINS; STEVE

REED, Major; LIEUTENANT HARTSO; ANN BECK,

Sergeant; CLARA PARSONS, Matron,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-97-4-MU)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry James Fowler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fowler

v. Ferrell, No. CA-97-4-MU (W.D.N.C., Feb. 12, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for leave to amend his complaint and dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

136 A.3d 978-983

#### Bank of America, N.A. v. Darby

04/06/2016

954 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 85
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     I, Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Morgan’sFoods, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:
 (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended May 22,2005, (the “Report”), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated:  July 6, 2005 /s/ Leonard R. Stein-Sapir   Leonard R. Stein-Sapir, Chairman of the Board and   Chief Executive Officer  
19
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6223
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EMMANUEL IKECHUKWU ANUDU, a/k/a Cletis, a/k/a Claytus, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-305-HAR) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 31, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emmanuel Ikechukwu Anudu, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e) motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Anudu , No. CR-91-305-HAR (D. Md. Nov. 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          79,734
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,154
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                61,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    289,217
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        601,475
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,044,499
<DEPOSITS>                                     833,569
<SHORT-TERM>                                   146,146
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,792
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,323
<COMMON>                                         7,734
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,044,499
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 44,709
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,856
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   868
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                63,433
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              21,499
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,262
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           36,171
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,670
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (112)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 19,080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,421
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,045
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.51
<LOANS-NON>                                        955
<LOANS-PAST>                                        22
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,921
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      595
<RECOVERIES>                                        28
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,024
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,024
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted March 26, 2009 ∗

Decided April 8, 2009

Before

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK

, Chief Judge

J OHN L. C OFFEY

, Circuit Judge

D IANE P. W OOD

, Circuit Judge



### No. 08

- 4099

U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA

, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

J OHN A. R ADERMACHER

, Defendant

- Appellant

. Appeal from the United

States District Court for the

Western District of Wisconsin.

No. 05

- CR

- 39

- C

- 01
Barbara B. Crabb, Chief Judge

.

Order

L ast fall we vacated Radermacher’ s sentence and remanded for resentencing in light of Kimbrough v. United States , 128 S

. Ct. 558 (2007). The district court then sentenced

Radermacher to 300 months in prison, 60 months below his g uideline range of 360 months to life. (That range reflects the amendments to the cocaine guidelines made in 2007.) The sentence before the remand had been 360 months. Despite this substantial reduction, Radermacher has appealed again. His lawyer has filed an Anders brie f, and

Rad ermacher has declined the court’ s invitation to respond. See Circuit Rule 51(b).

∗ This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f). NONPRECE DENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 08

- 4099 Page 2

After consulting with Radermacher, counsel represents that his client does not wish to withdraw his guilty plea. So the only potential appellate issues concern

sent encing. And as there was no contest in the distr ict court to the district judge’ s calculation of the g uidelines range, argument would be limited to a contention that the judge did not understand the extent of her discretion after United States v. Booker , 5 43 U.S. 220 (2005), or otherwise imposed a sentence unreasonable in light of the statutory criteria. Because the sentence is below a properly determined range, it is presumed reasonable on appeal, see Rita v. United States , 551 U.S. 338 (2007). And the pri or remand under Kimbrough ensured that the sentence reflected the full extent of judicial

discretion.

Thus there is no non

- frivolous iss ue for appeal. We grant counsel’ s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss the appeal as frivolous.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **1 52**  **9**

OLIVER R. COLEMAN , Plaintiff

– Appell ant ,

v.

PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES , Defendant

– Appe llee

.

Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Chief District Judge. ( 8:09

- cv
- 002 13

- DKC )

Submitted : January 19, 2011 Decided: February 2 , 2011

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY , Circuit Judge s , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Oliver R. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. J ulia Doyle Bernhardt, Assistant Attorney General, Bradley Neitzel, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Oliver R. Coleman appeals the district court ’s order dismissing this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for

failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted . We
have revie wed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Coleman v. Prince George’s County Dep ’ t of Soc. Servs. ,
No. 8:09

- cv
- 00213

- DKC (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2010) . We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 12-8286.

#### Davis *v.*Hudson Refinery et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**The following is a list of all of the Company’s significant subsidiaries, their jurisdiction ofincorporation and the names under which they do business, if different from their name.         **Any other name under which****Company** **Jurisdiction** **they do business**Jing Tai Industrial Investment Co.Ltd. Hong Kong N/A Jingle Technology Co. Ltd. BVI N/A BHL Networks Technology Co. Ltd. Cayman Island N/A Beijing BHL Networks TechnologyCo. Ltd. China N/A China Natures Technology Inc. BVI N/A Zhejiang University (Hangzhou)Innoessen Bio-technology Inc. China N/A Anji Science Bio-Product Inc. China N/A Shenzhen Innoessen Bio-Tech Inc. China N/A Jian’ou Yingshi Food Technology Ltd China N/A